Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution No. 23-129 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program to mitigate flooding in Zones 1 and 2Sponsored by: Interim City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 23-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA- LOCKA, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A HAZZARD MITIGATION GRANT APPLICATION FROM THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA REGION IV) HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM FOR TWO MILLION FOUR HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,410,000.00) (WITH A CITY MATCH OF EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($800,000.00) TO MITIGATE FLOODING ISSUES IN ZONES #1 AND #2 WITHIN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Interim City Manager of the City of Opa-Locka believes it is in the best interest of the City of Opa-Locka ("City") to submit a Hazzard Mitigation Grant application from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA Region IV) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", for Two Million, Four Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($2,410,000.00) (with a City match of Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000.00); and WHEREAS, a successful application will result in the City receiving Two Million, Four Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($2,410,000.00) in fiscal year 2024 to further address the City's flooding issues. The City match of Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000.00) would be sourced from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds; and WHEREAS, if received, the grant would be used to improve drainage in the southwest quadrant of the City (Zones #1 and #2 as indicated in Attachment "B", attached hereto); and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it in the best interest of the City and its residents to execute and submit the grant application, as described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA- LOCKA, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference. SECTION 2. The City Commission of the City of Opa-Locka, Florida, hereby authorizes the execution and submission of a Hazzard Mitigation Grant application from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA Region IV) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", for Two Million, Four Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($2,410,000.00) (with a City match of Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000.00). SECTION 3. Sections of this Resolution may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of typographical errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager, following review by the City Attorney and without need of public hearing, by filing a corrected copy of same with the City. Resolution No. 23-129 SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect upon the adoption and is subject to the approval of the Governor or Governor's Designee. PASSED and ADOPTED this 13th day of Septembe 21123. John H. Tay S r Jr., Mayor TEST: Joa a Flores, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Bur ette Norris -Weeks, P.A. Moved by: Commissioner Bass Seconded by: Commissioner Williams VOTE: 5-0 Commissioner Bass YES Commissioner Kelley YES Commissioner Williams YES Vice Mayor Ervin YES Mayor Taylor YES 2 City of Opa-locka Agenda Cover Memo City Manager: Darvin Williams CM Signature: G `C `C Commission Meeting Date: 9.13.2023 Item Type: (EnterX in box) Resolution Ordinance Other X Fiscal Impact: (EnterX in box) Yes No Ordinance Reading. (EnterX in box) 1st Reading 2nd Reading X Public Hearing: (EnterX in box) Yes No Yes No ) X X Funding Source: Account# : (Enter Fund & Dept) Ex: NA Advertising Requirement: (EnterX in box) Yes1 No Contract/P.O. Required: (EnterX in box) Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid#: X Strategic Plan Related (EnterX in box) Yes No Strategic Plan Priority Enhance Organizational Bus. & Economic Dev Public Safety Quality of Education Qual. of Life & City Image Communication Area: • Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy: (list the specific objective/strategy this item will address) X � I• � • Sponsor Name City Manager Department: City Manager Short Title: Hazzard Mitigation Grant Application Staff Summary: Staff believes it is in the best interest of the City to submit a Hazzard Mitigation Grant application for $2.41 million dollars (City match of $0.80 million). If received the grant would be used to improve drainage in the southwest quadrant of the City. (Zones #1 and #2 as indicated in the attachment). Financial Impact - A successful application will result in the City receiving $2.41 million dollars in FY 24 to further address the City's flooding issues. The City match of $0.8 million would be sourced from ARPA funds. Proposed Action: Staff recommends that the City Commission authorize the Interim City Manager to sign a Hazzard Mitigation Grant application for $2.41 million to mitigate flooding issues in Zones #1 and #2. Attachment: 1. Zones #1 & #2 1 1 Langley Rd WC( f��� NW,•1 15'ISt�Ste .- ,•_, r1.. .. N --- -( 44 .,..t., ,, ,.. ... ..,,„,,,if .4f�" .r -f I ff.� ..NW .1N11h St=2 , O�P�fig \ ADS °/ ,, . s 1:115:1---,22- .„..—'-' '''' '-7=2,,1 —tKgSIM stlltyv f' �� 1Ac o 04►''` ,,✓` f 1.,,,1P' G F• --.- • =ARABIiAv e.. ..0 \�^"'` n w 'NNW -199th StL^ "1� ., J� ^ ftr.. i j g t /. 7.'.4�J47SULTANAv e.:... �' a r�' S g\G,•'..— . /. ... D F4�,I1 r{ 1� , gE \`A A - ,. it j % Ilxr` JANN' Avo ; -�+.: jr". �'�5�, � t 2 \►18\ /7 �� /�/ ,,F o`Str... -A, SNAR A,f Av°t:7--SJw +- o 6p ���.'1'i'C^ SL=tDUNADA vetr-.a `7�w',La 4 S •. A�'O. 41 �r.•tye' yy 0 4l .5 �'.�7+•' D ,,,_ ,=JSESANE zfal 0.'i` a 69� i Dcre y o GO %� s i '' Je 3�' 4�:qV 11,7 4.7 �,- ,SHARA2AD:Blsd QvP .n �, a 1., . IY� QA 9\��A9in; .•'/`\�P`� �✓.=�., .143rd s1L�:�( 2 \�. `.`a� �`/ .4 I� q �� it 11 �I �`` ^�•• BURLINGTON et� 9� .�� .'T� '9t NW:141st 8t bC__ jj�. �� C,2 ), Af p '' ao ,\ytr% i.+_3NW -149th'S I z ° 1i SIGN ' Cp° w,� NW 139th Std^1m uE: � I �Z .�:�..+ 9 I 9 TIC NWx935th 1_1.1 dam AJt1 A t AS zg_.. . 33Cr' FNW.158th 3tA-ri-:...Z '•' l ✓� r 1;21_2A0 5 C • 20 G o YOR St � •`3�' ° r, y •y ll UI • ^1 � iJ ...i_. 1 1 rD p AJait WEST Dr ...1` ."`�a."• `i Yo-y9UPER1OR St= Cam•_'• ' j..• Dom.,. NW 136tht� y r > ^. ATLANTIC Ave 3 Ter '�'� •ss L OC KAiBI vd /,.;�`E NW 143rd T or ... yofsLisUloR St {LFi� •. ?� ATIANTIC • -s4 -s _. ��s �$Nw,�33st o An Nw.133 d Sidi, N 1 I� ` °4I.�~ 1 ,1,a NW .134tib 51= aNW Bard Sl' P. = . . S 1 NW.132nd.Ter a 4 !==t:NWand :1 4Stk u I`4(1 :. .• 3 S � .- . NW 13,st St w { ,��1 , I% i ( t (� LIT` Stt4 1) Y: •::i III 4. w�-•�",?� 21h's` �u..v. Prat=r :•.�' f_.�i s e• �< 5 3 a R D NW 129Th Sl ••--NW 127th t = y _ ._ n i �..�... q= .5NW,1271h St rom_ I •1u• City of Opa-locka Right of Way Map y RW Opa Locka City_Limits 1 w 1 Zone 1 2 Roads Drainage y.. City of Opa-locka Cairo Lane / NW 1271" St. Roadway Improvement Project HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM FEMA-4673-DR-FL HURRICANE IAN FloridaDisaster.oRG e„a�+ DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FEMA FEMA- -DR-FL Support Documents ❑ Conforms w/ State 409 Plan ❑ In Declared Area ❑ Statewide THIS SECTION FOR STATE USE ONLY ❑ Standard HMGP ❑ 5% Initiative Application ❑ Application Complete ❑ Initial Submission or ❑ Re- Submission Eligible Applicant ❑ State or Local Government ❑ Private Non -Profit (Tax ID Received) ❑ Recognized Indian Tribe or Tribal Organization Community NFIP Status: (Check all that apply) LMS Ranking: ❑ Participating Community ID#: County: El In Good Standing ❑ Non -Participating ❑ CRS State Application ID: Project Type(s) ❑ Wind ❑ Flood ❑ Other: This application is for all Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA Region IV) Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) proposals. Complete ALL sections and provide the documents requested. If you require technical assistance, contact the Florida Division of Emergency Management at DEM_HazardMitigationGrantProgram@em.myflorida.com. Section I — Applicant A. Applicant Instruction: Complete all sections that correspond with the type of proposed project Application Sections I -IV: Environmental Review: Maintenance Agreement: Flood Control — Drainage Improvement Worksheet: Generator Worksheet: Tornado Safe Room Worksheet: Hurricane Safe Room Worksheet: Wind Retrofit Worksheet: Wildfire Worksheet: Drought Worksheet: Utility Mitigation Worksheet Request for Public Assistance Form: Acquisition Forms: Application Completeness Guidance / Checklist : All Applicants must complete these sections All Applicants must complete these sections Any Applications involving public property, public ownership, or management of property Acquisition, Elevation, Dry Flood Proofing, Drainage Improvements, Flood Control Measures, Floodplain and Stream Restoration, and Flood Diversion — one worksheet per structure Permanent, portable generators, and permanent emergency standby pumps New Safe Room, Retrofit of existing structure, Community Safe Room, Residential Safe Room New Safe Room, Retrofit of existing structure Wind Retrofit projects only — one worksheet per structure Defensible Space, Hazardous Fuels Reduction, Ignition Resistant Construction, other Aquifers, other Upgrades to sewer systems, upgrading electrical components for a utility, undergrounding electrical systems, etc. FEMA Form 90-49 (Request for Public Assistance): All applicants must complete, if applicable. If project type is Acquisition, these forms must be completed. (Only one of the two Notice of Voluntary Interest forms is necessary.) Model Statement of Assurances for Property Acquisition Projects Declaration and Release Notice of Voluntary Interest (Town Hall Version) Notice of Voluntary Interest (Single Site Version) Statement of Voluntary Participation FEMA Model Deed Restriction Language All applicants are recommended to complete this checklist and utilize the guidance for completing the application. 1 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) DocuSign Envelope ID: B1A010EE-BBB9-4CC9-A104-080991A98D49 B. Applicant Information: FEMA-4673-DR-FL DISASTER NAME: Hurricane Ian Title of Project: Zone 1 & 2 Roads Drainage 1. Applicant (Organization): Citv of Opa-locka 2. Applicant Type: ® State or Local Government ❑ Native American Tribe ❑ Private Non -Profit 0 Special District 3. County: Miami -Dade 4. State Legislative Senate District(s): 34; State Legislative House District(s): 109 ; Congressional House District(s): 24 5. Federal Tax I.D. Number: 596000394 6. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS): 083111823 7. Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Code*: 025-51650 (*if your FIPS code is not known, see guidance) 8. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Identification Number. 120657 (this number can be obtained from the FIRM map for your area) 9. Point of Contact: (Applicant staff serving as the coordinator of project) 0Ms. ❑Mr. First Name: Adelina Last Name: Gross Title: Capital Improvement Manager Address: 780 Fisherman Street City: Opa-locka Telephone: 305-953-2821 Email: agross@opalockafl.gov State: FL Zip Code: 33054 10. Application Prepared by: ❑Ms. ®Mr. First Name: Robert Title: Budget Administrator Address: 780 Fisherman Street Last Name: Anathan City: Opa-locka Telephone: 305-953-2868 Email: ranathan@opalockafl.gov Organization: City of Opa-locka State: FL Zip Code: 33054 11. Authorized Applicant Agent (proof of authorization authority required) ❑Ms. ®Mr. First Name: Darvin Last Name: Williams Title: Interim City Manager Address: 780 Fisherman Street City: Opa-locka Telephone: 305-953-2821 Email: dwilliams@opalockafl.gov lao—S.swil by. State: FL Zip Code: 33054 Signature: Date: 8/27/2023 V wiin wi(),iawts �C48C07C1E8CE492... 12. Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Compliance a. All proposed projects must be included in the county's Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Project List, and on file with FDEM's Mitigation Bureau Planning Unit. Does your jurisdiction have a current FEMA Approved Mitigation Plan and this project is listed? 0 Yes 0 No b. Attached is a letter of endorsement for this project from the county's LMS Coordinator. 0 Yes 0 No Ensure the LMS endorsement letter contains both the Total Estimated Projects Cost (Section IV. D.), along with the Estimated Federal Share (Section IV. 1.1.) allocated to this project. c. The LMS project list and endorsement letter both have an estimated cost column and Federal Share amount that is within $500.00 between the two. 0 Yes 0 No 13. Has this project been submitted under a previous disaster event? 0 No ❑ Yes, provide the disaster number and project number (as applicable): 2 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) Section II — Project Description A. Hazards to be Mitigated / Level of Protection 1. Select the type of hazards the proposed project will mitigate: • Flood ❑ Wind ❑ Storm surge ❑ Wildfire ❑ Other (list): 2. Identify the type of proposed project: ❑ Elevation and retrofitting of residential or non-residential structure D Acquisition and Relocation ❑ Acquisition and Demolition ❑ Wind retrofit ® Drainage project that reduces localized flooding ❑ Generator 0 Other (explain) 3. List the total number of persons that will be protected by the proposed project (include immediate population affected by the project only): 1320 4. List how many acres of "Total Impacted Area" is to be protected by the proposed project (include immediate area affected by the project only): 1.8 5. Fill in the level of protection and the magnitude of event the proposed project will mitigate. (e.g. 23 structures protected against the 100 -year storm event (1% chance) 335 structure(s) protected against the 100 -year storm event (10, 25, 50, 100, or 500 year storm event) structure(s) protected against mile per hour (mph) winds 6. Check all item(s) the project may impact: ❑ Wetlands ❑ Floodplain ❑ Historic Resources ® Vegetation Removal ® Health & Safety r4 Water Quality O Coastal Zone ❑ Fisheries 0 Public Controversy O Other ❑ Previously Undisturbed Soil ❑ Toxic or Hazardous Substances O Threatened & Endangered Species O Potential for Cumulative Impacts 7. Engineered projects: If your project has been already designed and engineering information is available, attach to your application ALL calculations, H&H study and design plans (e.g. Drainage Improvement, Erosion Control, or other special project types). ® No ❑ Yes If so, see Attachment #(s) B. Project Description, Scope of Work, and Protection Provided (Must be Completed in Detail) Describe, in detail, the existing problem, the proposed project, and the scope of work. Explain how the proposed project will solve the problem(s) and provide the level(s) of protection described in Part A. Also, if available, attach a vendor's estimate and/or a contractor's bid for the scope of work. Ensure that each proposed project is mitigation and not maintenance. 3 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) 1. Describe the existing problems: The City of Opa-locka was incorporated in 1926 and is located within the northwestern area of Miami -Dade County within a geographic area of 4.2 square miles. The City has a mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial zones in addition to a general aviation airport. Similar to the rest of South Florida, the City continues to witness a growth in population, and it is anticipated that with the redevelopment initiatives the City has introduced, there will be significant growth within the next ten -to -twenty-year time frame. It is, therefore, incumbent on the City to ensure that its infrastructure meets the current and projected needs of not only an increase in residents but also the growing threat of flooding from changing conditions in the climate. One of the most significant challenges for the community is effective stormwater management, and as a result, the reduction of flooding in the City of Opa-locka has been a focus of the Mayor and Commissioners for many years. As conditions in the region continue to produce frequent and more severe storms, there is an immediate need to address this problem. The City has completed several major planning initiatives to address these issues and identify the most impactful course of action to protect, first and foremost, public safety and property but also further the economic redevelopment of the community. Opa-locka, over the years, has suffered from significant flooding costing millions of dollars in damage to residents and businesses. Opa-locka's existing stormwater system consists of several facilities that were built independently rather than as part of an integrated stormwater network. Even though the City has drainage canals, the sewers and drains were not designed to convey stormwater runoff into them. The project area is in extremely poor condition and is in need of rehabilitation. The project is located in a low-lying area within the City and does not have an existing working drainage system. These streets experience significant flooding when there is a rain event. The flood water remains stationary for a long period of time due to the waterlogged soil and a lack of drainage or adequate drainage system. The pondinq is a potential health hazard as the stagnant water attracts mosquitoes and possible contamination from sanitary sewer system(s) in close proximity. The roadwork will re -engineer and upgrade the water, sewer, and electrical infrastructure that service the area. The primary stormwater management system for the City of Opa-locka consists of canals, swales, digressional areas, and exfiltration trenches. Very few of the Roadway drainage systems are connected to the canals. The City has Opa locka Canal, Burlington Street Canal, Spur -1 Canal, and NW 127th Street Canal for ultimate discharge into C-8 and C-7 canals. The canals are not optimally used, and most of the City streets have no drainage or a very inadequate drainage system. The City experiences flooding problems for most of the rain events, even with a one-year frequency. The Roadways within commercial areas are very prone to frequent flooding problems due to the absence of any functional drainage system. The Roadway crowns get inundated even at very short duration, low -frequency rain events, and the businesses are impacted. In the case of a three-year, 24 -hour frequency rain event, Cairo Lane and NW 127th Street lost functionality completely for a few days as the runoff had no way to exit or exfiltrate except evaporation. The prolonged, frequent flooding condition damages Roadway surfaces and creates traffic circulation problems. The City has spent approximately $530,000 or $75,000 per year since 2014 on repairing the Roadway corridor. This cost does not include in-house work by City personnel. In addition to experiences of existing flooding, the need for the proposed project was identified by the development of the City-wide Stormwater Master Plan completed in 2022. The stormwater master plan initiative comprised an organized approach to identify problem areas and implement targeted infrastructure improvements and best management practices to alleviate flooding conditions. The plan identified the stormwater improvements in the project area as an immediate need. 4 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) 2. Describe the type(s) of protection that the proposed project will provide: The project will be designed to provide flood protection from 100 -year storm events. The stormwater elements being improved and/or constructed include drainage pipes, catch basins, treatment structures, and an outfall embankment. A new force main along Cairo Road will connect to the larger CIP force main. All these components of the project will enhance the conveyance of stormwater into the City's larger system and move the water out of the streets and away from residences, businesses, and schools. The development of resilient infrastructure within the project area will lead to the following outcomes: 1. Provide new and effective drainage facilities where none exist in the community. 2. Develop resilient stormwater infrastructure to meet the increased threat of flooding from 5 -year, 10 -year, 25 -year, and 100 -near storm events. 3. Protect residents, schools, and businesses from the impacts of flooding, including property damage, transportation disruption, and personal safety. 4. Further the City Stormwater Master Plan with the implementation of priority projects. 5. Foster economic redevelopment by providing resilient critical infrastructure. Once complete, the project will provide flood protection for not only the Roadway but four schools, one church, 40 residences, and 290 businesses. The project will also enhance the protection of critical infrastructure such as lift stations, utilities, and communication lines. In addition to protecting property, the reduction in flooding will ensure access to the area for effective emergency response from fire and police personnel as well as post -disaster recovery from City and County personnel. Similar to the proposed mitigation project, most stormwater projects are initiated based on immediate need. Communities in South Florida are faced with the challenge of developing critical infrastructure that provides protection today while planning for increased rainfall events and sea -level rise amid a growing population. As with most municipalities in Miami -Dade County, resiliency planning has become a priority with all types of infrastructure. Public projects such as stormwater improvements must provide protection from the level of severe weather that will impact the region a decade from now. Through effective planning with tools such as the Stormwater Master Plan, infrastructure projects can be constructed to benefit the community beyond the primary goal of flood protection. Resilient facilities are cost-effective by spending public funding on proiects that will have long lives, thus reducing the cost of having to improve or replace in the near future to meet changing conditions. The proposed project will meet both the immediate goals and long-term obiectives for the community's resiliency effort. 5 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) 3. Scope of Work (describe in detail what you are planning to do): The project is located along Cairo Lane between NW 127th Street and NW 135th Street; NW 127th Street between Cairo Lane and NW 32nd Ave; and Alexandria Drive. The project seeks to address drainage issues and poor roadway conditions in the area, with additional improvements to the sewer and water systems. A summary of the scope of work for the mitigation project is provided below. • The stormwater improvement proposes the installation of HDPE corrugated drainage pipes ranging in size between 15 -inch to 24 -inch, the installation of four (4) stormwater catch basins, the repairing of damaged existing catch basin, and the installation of inner components of the stormwater treatment structure. The project also includes the installation of rip -rap at the stormwater outfall embankment and the installation of a manatee grate for the outfall. • The roadway improvements include the installation of new concrete pavement along Cairo Lane and 127th Street, with pavement restoration at the intersection of Cairo Lane and 135th Street and new median installation at the intersection of 127th Street and 32nd Avenue. The project also includes new pavement markings and signage. • The project includes the installation of approximately 145 LF of a 3 -inch HDPE force main along Cairo Lane with the interconnection to an existing 16 -inch CIP force main at the intersection of Cairo Lane and 135th Street and the installation of force main service connections. The project would involve the installation of adjusting rim elevation of sewer existing valves to meet the proposed grade. The project also proposes the installation of two (2) fire hydrant assemblies for the existing water system, repairing or replacing any damaged fire hydrants, and repairing or replacing any damaged water meters. The project also includes adjustment of the rim elevation of existing water valves and water meter boxes to meet the proposed grade. A detailed scope of work, cost estimate, and site layout are included as attachments to the application. In addition to the construction activities, funding from the HMGP is being requested for final design and permitting. The City is requesting funding in the amount of $2,410,489. This amount represents 75% of the total project cost. The remaining 25%, 803,497, will be provided by the City. The scope of work for the project includes having consultants complete design and permitting. However, the cost of construction for the stormwater infrastructure will represent the largest percentage of the requested funding. A construction contractor will be engaged through a competitive bid process. The total time needed to complete the scope of work is 24 months. 4. Describe any other on -going or proposed projects in the area that may impact, positively or negatively, the proposed HMGP Project: There are currently no ongoing or proposed projects in the area that may impact the proposed HMGP project. 6 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) Section III — Project Location (Fully describe the location of the proposed project.) A. Site 1. Describe the physical location of this project, including street numbers (or neighborhoods) and project site zip code(s). Provide precise longitude and latitude coordinates for the site utilizing a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit or the equivalent: Site Location: City of Opa-Iocka, FL Address(es): GPS coordinates (decimal degree format): 25.8933071, -80.2577659 Project Zip Code(s): 33054 2. Titleholder: City of Opa-Iocka ROW 3. Is the project site seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL)? ['Yes ® No 4. Provide the number of each structure type (listed below) in the project area that will be affected by the project. Include all structures in project area. ® Residential property: 40 ❑ Public buildings: ® Businesses/commercial property: 290 ® Schools/hospitals/houses of worship: 5 ❑ Other: B. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Showing Project Site 1. ►1 Attach one (1) copy of the FIRM map, a copy of the panel information from the FIRM, and, if available, the Floodway Map. FIRM maps are required for this application (if published for your area). Also, all attached maps must have the project site and structures clearly marked on the map. FIRMs are typically available from your local floodplain administrator who may be located in a planning, zoning, or engineering office. Maps can also be ordered from the Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616. For more information about FIRMs, contact your local agencies or visit the FIRM site on the FEMA Web - page at https://msc.fema.gov/portal. 2. Using the FIRM, determine the flood zone(s) of the project site (Check all zones in the project area) (See FIRM legend for flood zone explanations) (A Zone must be identified) ❑ VE or V 1-30 ❑ AE or A 1-30 AO or AH ❑ A (no base flood elevation given) ❑ B or X (shaded) ❑ C or X (unshaded) ❑ Floodway ❑ ❑ Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CBRA) Zone (Federal regulations strictly limit Federal funding for projects in this Zone; coordinate with your state agency before submitting an application for a CBRA Zone project). 3. ❑ If the FIRM Map for your area is not published, attach a copy of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) for your area, with the project site and structures clearly marked on the map. 4. ❑ Attach a copy of a Model Acknowledgement of Conditions for Mitigation in Special Flood Hazard Area C. Maps with Project Site and Photographs 1. ® Attach a copy of a city or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) with the project site and structures marked on the map. 2. ® Attach a USGS 1:24,000 TOPO map with project site clearly marked on the map. 3. ❑ For acquisition or elevation projects, include copy of Parcel Map (Tax Map, Property Identification Map, etc.) showing each property to be acquired or elevated. Include the Tax ID numbers for each parcel, and Parcel information — including year built and foundation. 4. ® Attach photographs (at a minimum 4 photographs) for each project site per application. The photographs should be representative of the project area, including any relevant streams, creeks, rivers, etc. and drainage areas that affect the project site or will be affected by the project, and labeled. For each structure, include the following angles: front, back and both sides. 7 27P-22-.007 F.A.G FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) Section IV — Budget/Costs In order to assist applicants with filling out the following Budget section, we have provided the following instructions for your convenience. For this section, we ask that you provide details of all the estimated costs of the project, as it is used for the benefit -costs analysis as well as for the feasibility and effectiveness review. For the cost sections relating to Materials, Labor, and Fees, it is important to note, • Lump sums without supporting documentation showing a breakdown of those costs are not acceptable. For those items that will not fit in the spaces provided, attach the appropriate documentation to your application. • Identify your match sources in sections B and I. • Sub -Total cells will auto sum the costs in their respective columns. • Do not factor management costs into parts A -C. If management costs are being requested, see part G. • Contingency Costs need to be justified and reported as a separate line item in part E of this section. From left to right in that part, enter the desired percentage (maximum 5% of Material/Labor), the amount the percentage is to be applied to, and the resulting amount. PLEASE NOTE- These cells will not auto -calculate across the row, but the final cell will be calculated into the Final Project Cost below it. Take care that everything is calculated correctly. • Pre -Award Costs: costs must be identified as a separate line item, AND a completed HMGP Pre -Award Cost Request Form MUST be submitted with this application, detailing the items/cost and requested start date. • Mark all In -kind (donated) services with (**); In-house (employee) services with (***), per each line item. • All funding sources (In -kind, In-house, Global Match, and Other Agencies) must be identified (below) AND identified on the Funding Sources - Section IV I. For project management costs, in compliance with Disaster Relief and Recovery Act of 2018 (DRRA) and the subsequent FEMA Interim Policy #104-11-1, the Florida Division of Emergency Management has included a section for applicants to request, or refuse, project management funds that are available to them. Under this new policy, HMGP projects awarded under disasters declared on or after August 1, 2017, are eligible for project management costs up to 5 percent of their total project costs. Applicants choosing to apply for this funding must detail the specific administrative costs in Part G of this section. These costs must be eligible administrative costs, conforming to the requirements set in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E. Applicants must ensure that their administrative costs are reasonable, allowable, allocable, and necessary for the performance of the federal award. The State will allot these management costs on a project -by -project basis per the amount requested by the sub -recipient, up to 5 percent of the total project cost. A sub -recipient may request less than this, but no higher. These management costs will be considered a separate pool of funding, and WILL NOT affect a project's benefit -cost analysis. Management costs will be reimbursed per reimbursement request, and no more than 5 percent of any given reimbursement request amount. All management costs reimbursements will be contingent upon adequate documentation from the sub -recipient. Management costs will be reimbursed at 100 percent of the amount of management costs requested, so far as they are adequately documented and are no more than 5 percent of the request. Any unused management costs at closeout following the final payment will be de -obligated. If the final total project cost results in an under -run, management costs will be reduced accordingly. Applicants must make the determination to request or refuse management costs at the time of formal application submittal. The State will accept the initial determination from the applicant. There will be no recourse from the State for applicants wishing to change their initial determination after the application has been formally submitted. 8 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) A. Materials Item Unit Quantity Cost per Unit Cost Drainage Structures/Pipe $888,780.00 $888,780.00 Asphat Concrete $133,759.00 $133,759.00 Limerock Base Material $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Curb and Gutter $80,000.00 $80,000.00 Concrete $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Turf $6,111.00 $6,111.00 Signs/marking $5,667.00 $5,667.00 Sub -Total $1,414,317.00 B. Labor Include equipment costs. Indicate all "soft" or in -kind matches (**). Description Hours Rate Cost Drainage Structures/Pipe 1 $592,520.00 $592,520.00 Asphat Concrete 1 $89,173.00 $89,173.00 Limerock Base Material 1 $264,000.00 $264,000.00 Curb and Gutter 1 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 Concrete Install 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Turf 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Utlitiies Relocation 1 $28,801.00 $28,801.00 Environmental Conditions 1 $238,384.00 $238,384.00 ROW Restoration 1 $19,067.00 $19,067.00 Install Signs/Markings 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Sub -Total $1,421,945.00 C. Fees Paid Include any other costs associated with the project. Description of Task Hours Rate Cost *Pre -Award Engineering $327,724.00 $327,724.00 Permits 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Sub -Total $377,724.00 D. Total Estimated Project Cost E. Contingency Costs (maximum 5% of Material/Labor) 0.00% $0.00 $3,213,986.0 0 F. Final Project Cost $3,213,986.0 Note: To be eligible for HMGP Pre -Award costs — the costs must be identified as a separate line item in the estimate above, AND a completed HMGP Pre -Award Cost Request Form MUST be submitted with this application, detailing the items/cost requesting. Mark all In -kind (donated) services with (**); In-house (employee) services with (***), per each line item. 9 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) All funding sources (In -kind, In-house, Global Match, and Other Agencies) must be identified (above) AND identified on the Funding Sources - Section IV 1. G. Project Management Costs Based on the amount of total project cost being requested in Part D (above), your project is eligible for up to an additional 5% of that amount for project management costs. Indicate below whether or not you would like to request these funds and follow the directions for your selected choice. Total Estimated Management Costs Available (5% of Total Project Costs) $160,699.30 Note: This number will be generated automatically after Part I is completed ❑ YES, I would like to requests these funds (Fill out the itemized table below, then continue to Part I)* • NO, I do not wish to request these funds. (continue to Part I)* Description Hours Rate Cost H. Total Estimated Management Costs Requested $0.00 *Note: By selecting either "yes" or "no" the applicant is acknowledging that they understand what is being offered to them as it is described in this application. 10 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar) The maximum FEMA share for HMGP projects is 75%. The other 25% can be made up of State and Local funds as well as in -kind services. HMGP funds may be packaged with other Federal funds, but other Federal funds (except for Federal funds that lose their Federal identity at the State level, such as CDBG, and certain tribal funds) may not be used for the Non - Federal share of the costs. 1. Estimated Federal Share 2. Non -Federal Shares 3. Estimated Local Shares 4. 5. 6. $2,410,489.00 75 % of Total (Maximum 75%) $803,497.00 25 % of Total (Cash) % of Total (In -Kind**) % of Total (In -House***) % of Total (Global Match 7. Other Agency Share % of Total (Identify Non -Federal Agency and availability date) 8. Total Funding sources from above $3,213,986.00 100.00% Total (Equals 100%) ❑**Identify proposed eligible activities directly related to project to be considered for In -Kind services in Section IV.C. Fees ❑***Identify proposed eligible activities directly related to project to be considered for In -House services in Section IV.C. Fees Separate project applications must be submitted for each Global Match project. Global Match Project Number and Title: 9. Total Estimated Management Costs Requested Available $160,699.30 5% of Total (Max Allowed) J. Project Milestones/Schedule of Work List the major milestones in this project by providing an estimated time -line for the critical activities not to exceed a period of 3 years (36 -months) of performance. (e.g. Contracting, Designing, Engineering, Permitting, Inspections, closeout, etc.) Milestone(s) Number of Months to Complete FDEM/City Agreement Execution 1 Bid for Design 1 Design 5 Permit 2 Bid Construction 2 Construction 12 Inspection 1 Total 24 Months 11 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) Section V. Environmental Review and Historic Preservation Compliance (NOTE: This application cannot be processed if this section is not completed.) Because the HMGP is a federally funded program, all projects are required to undergo an environmental and historic preservation review as part of the grant application process. Moreover, all projects must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated Federal, State, Tribal, and Local statutes to obtain funding. NO WORK can be done prior to the NEPA review process. If work is done on your proposed project before the NEPA review is completed, it will NOT be eligible for Federal funding. A. The following information is required for the Environmental and Historic Preservation review: All projects must have adequate documentation to determine if the proposed project complies with NEPA and associated statutes. The State Environmental Staff provide comprehensive NEPA technical assistance for Applicants, with their consent, to complete the NEPA review. The type and quantity of NEPA documents required to make this determination varies depending upon the project's size, location, and complexity. However, at a minimum, provide the applicable documentation from this section to facilitate the NEPA compliance process. 1. ® Detailed project description, scope of work, and budget/costs (Section II and Section IV of this application). 2. ® Project area maps (Section III, part B & C of this application). 3. ❑ Project area/structure photographs (Section III, part C of this application). 4. IL Preliminary project plans. 5. ® Project alternatives description and impacts (Section V of the application). 6. ® Complete the applicable project worksheets. Documentation showing dates of construction are required for all structures. 7. ® Environmental Justice — Provide any applicable information or documentation regarding low income or minority populations in the project area. See Section V.B of this application for details. 8. ® Provide any applicable information or documentation referenced on the Information and Documentation Requirements by Project Type below. B. Executive Order 12898; Environmental Justice for Low Income and Minority Population: 1. Are there low income or minority populations in the project area or adjacent to the project area? ❑ No ® Yes; describe any disproportionate and adverse effects to these populations: The Project Site is located in a Miami -Dade County US Census tract 12086000503 that has been designated as Disadvantaged by the Justice40 Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) in 7 categories of Energy, Health, Housing, Legacy Pollution, Transportation, Water and wastewater, and Workforce Development. The project Site is located in Block Group 3 of Miami -Dade Census tract 5.03 and is reported by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to have a Low - to Moderate -Income (LMI) level of 100%. The project will not have a negative impact on these populations. The construction of new drainage facilities will only improve their quality of life. 2. ® To help evaluate the impact of the project, explain below or attach any other information that describes the population, or portion of the population, that would be either disproportionately or adversely affected. Include specific efforts to address the adverse impacts in your proposal narrative and budget. HUD documentation of income and need as well as Environmental Justice Documentation is attached. 12 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) C. Tribal Consultation (Information Required) Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings on historic properties. The NHPA requires that agencies must complete this process prior to the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking. A Tribal Consultation is required for any project disturbing ground or moving soil, including but not limited to: drainage projects; demolition; construction; elevation; communication towers; tree removal; utility improvements. 1. Describe the current and future use of the project location. A land use map may be provided in lieu of a written description. The project site is currently City -owned ROW. The use will not be changed in the future. 2. Provide information on any known site work or historic uses for project location. There are no previous uses other than the current use. ® Attach a copy of a city or county scale map (large enough to show the entire project area) with the horizontal limits (feet) and vertical depths (square feet) of all anticipated ground disturbance of 3 inches or more. D. Alternative Actions (Information Required) The NEPA process requires that at least two alternative actions be considered that address the same problem/issue as the proposed project. In this section, list two feasible alternative projects to mitigate the hazards faced in the project area. One alternative is the "No Action Alternative". 1. No Action Alternative Discuss the impacts on the project area if no action is taken. The "no action" alternative would lead to continued flooding in the project area with existing drainage vulnerabilities increasing the already existing risks to people and property. The impacts of flood waters would result in significant property damage costs, personal safety issues, and economic disruptions. 2. Other Feasible Alternative Describe a feasible alternative project that would be the next best solution if the primary alternative is not accomplished. This could be an entirely different mitigation method or a significant modification to the design of the current proposed project. Include a Scope of Work, engineering details (if applicable), estimated budget and the impacts of this alternative. Complete all of parts a -e (below). a. Project Description for the Alternative Describe, in detail, the alternative project, and explain how the alternative project will solve the problem(s) and/or provide protection from the hazard(s). Also, provide pros and cons for this alternative and a reason for why it was not selected. One alternative to the proposed HMGP is to only complete the improvements to the main drainage pipes running throughout the area. The increase in the capacity of these pipes would result in greater drainage for the roadway and surrounding businesses. However, if the ability of the water being emptied into the larger conveyance system is not developed, then the overall capacity of the system will limit the impact of the new piping to the north. This alternative would be less costly and take less time to complete but would only represent a partial mitigation of the drainage issues. b. Project Location of the Alternative (describe briefly, if different from proposed project) The alternative project will take place at the same location and area as the HMGP project. ❑ Attach a map or diagram showing the alternative site in relation to the proposed project site (if different from proposed project) 13 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) c. Scope of Work for Alternative Project The scope of work would consist of the following: Design Permitting General Conditions Bond Drainage Structures w/ baffles (Curb Inlets) Drainage Structures (MAS) 24 -inch Solid Pipe 18 -inch Solid Pipe The estimated cost for the alternative project is approximately $482,500, including design and permitting. The total time needed to complete the project would be 18 months. d. Impacts of Alternative Project Discuss the impact of this alternative on the project area. Include comments on these issues as appropriate: Environmental Justice, Endangered Species, Wetlands, Hydrology (Upstream and Downstream Surface Water Impacts), Floodplain/Floodway, Historic Preservation and Hazardous Materials. The alternative project would not significantly impact with ground disturbance any residents or surrounding facilities as the work would be done in the ROW and underground. Transportation access would need to be maintained as work was completed to ensure access for all those traveling in and out of the areas. There are also no significant environmental, cultural, or historical resources that would be impacted. e. Estimated Budget/Costs for Alternative Project In this section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the alternative project (round figures to the nearest dollar). A lump sum budget is acceptable. Materials: $505,000.00 Labor: $710,000.00 Fees: $135,000.00 Total Estimated Project Cost: $1,350,000.00 14 27P-22-.007 F.A.0 FDEM Form No. HMGP Application (01-2020) (Eff. 01-2020) HMGP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Information and Documentation Requirements by Project Type Retrofits to Existing Facilities/Structures Elevations Acquisitions with Demolition 1 Dates of Construction ✓ Ground disturbance map for projects with 3 inches or more of ground disturbance 1 Structure photographs Drainage Improvements 1 Engineering plans/drawings ✓ Permit or Exemption letter to address any modifications to water bodies and wetlands o Department of Environmental Protection o Water Management District o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ✓ Ground disturbance map for projects with 3 inches or more of ground disturbance. 1 Concurrence from U.S. Fish and Wildlife addressing any impacts to wildlife, particularly endangered and threatened species and their habitats. ✓ If the project is in a coastal area, attach a letter from the National Marine Fisheries Service addressing impacts to marine resources. ✓ Concurrence from Natural Resource Conservation Service if project is located outside city limits and may impact prime or unique farmland. ✓ Concurrence from your Local Floodplain Manager — if project is located in a floodplain. Note: This is a general guideline for most projects. However, there will be exceptions. Consult with state environmental staff on project types not listed. 15 DocuSign Envelope ID: B1A010EE-BBB9-4CC9-A104-080991A98D49 Section VI — Maintenance Agreement All applicants whose proposed project involves the retrofit or modification of existing public property or whose proposed project would result in the public ownership or management of property, structures, or facilities, must first sign the following agreement prior to submitting the application to FEMA. (NOTE: Not applicable to projects solely related to residential or private property.) The City of Opa-locka , State of Florida, hereby agrees that if it receives any Federal aid as a result of the attached project application, it will accept responsibility, at its own expense if necessary, for the routine maintenance of any real property, structures, or facilities acquired or constructed as a result of such Federal aid. Routine maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, such responsibilities as keeping vacant land clear of debris, garbage, and vermin; keeping stream channels, culverts, and storm drains clear of obstructions and debris; and keeping detention ponds free of debris, trees, and woody growth. The purpose of this agreement is to make clear the Sub -recipient's maintenance responsibilities following project award and to show the Sub -recipient's acceptance of these responsibilities. It does not replace, supersede, or add to any other maintenance responsibilities imposed by Federal law or regulation and which are in force on the date of project award. Signed by Darvin Williams (printed or typed name of signing official) Interim City Manager (title) the duly authorized representative This 27th (day)of August (month), 2023 (year). oocusienea b,: Signature* (a'ouitA.Out ,s *Note: The above signature must be by an individual with legal signing authority for the respective local government or county (e.g., the Chairperson, Board of County Commissioners or the County Manager, etc.) 16 HMGP Application Completeness Guidance/Checklist This guidance/checklist contains an explanation, example and/or reference for information requested in the application. Use this list to assure your application is complete and includes the required information for HMGP projects. The appropriate documentation must also be attached. It is important to note that this list is similar to the form that will be used during the application sufficiency review by the HMGP staff. Project Title: Zone 1 & 2 Roads Drainage Applicant: City of Opa-locka Application Information Explanation of Information Required Section 1 Iicant Information FEMA -DR-FL Type in the four digit number FEMA assigned to the disaster that this application is being submitted under. (Example: 4337, 4283) DISASTER NAME Type in the Disaster name. (Example: Hurricane Irma, Tropical Storm Fay) Title of Project The project title should include: 1) Name of Applicant, 2) Name of Project, 3) Type of Project. (Example: City of Tallahassee, City Hall Building, Wind Retrofit) 1. Applicant Name of organization applying. Must be an eligible applicant. 2. Applicant Type State or local government, recognized Native American tribe, or private non-profit organization. If private non-profit, attach documentation showing legal status as a 501(C). (Example: IRS letter, Tax Exempt Certificate) 3. County Indicate county in which the project is located. 4. State Legislative and Congressional District(s) Specify the appropriate State Senate, House and Congressional District code for the project site. For multiple sites, list codes for each site. http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/sections/representatives/myrepresentative.aspx 5. Federal Tax I.D. Number List the Federal Employer's Identification Number (FEIN), also known as Federal Tax Identification number, 9 -digit code. May be obtained from your finance/accounting department. 6. DUNS Number Include Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in appropriate location on application. Typically, this number can be obtain through your finance department. If not, use the link below to look up your entity. If none, exists you can use the same link to request one. https://www.dnb.com/duns-number.html 7. FIPS Code List the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Code. May be obtained from your finance/accounting/grants department. If none, submit FEMA Form 90-49. See state website under the relevant disaster (https://floridad isaster.org/dem/mitigation/hazard-mitigation-grant-program/) 8. NFIP ID Number List the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) number. You must be a participating NFIP member to be eligible for HMGP funding. Make sure that the number is the same as the panel number on the FIRM provided with the application. 9. Point of Contact Provide all pertinent information for the point of contact. This person serves as the coordinator of the project. If this information changes once the application is submitted, please contact the HMGP staff immediately. 10. Application Prepared By Provide the preparer information. May be different from the point of contact (line 9) and/or the applicant's agent (line 11). I 11. Authorized Applicant Agent An authorized agent must sign the application. An authorized agent is the chief elected official of a local govemment who has signature authority, so for a county it would be the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and for a municipality it would be the Mayor (the exact title sometimes varies). Any local govemment may delegate this authority to a subordinate official (like a City or County Manager) by resolution of the governing body (the Board of County Commissioners or Board of City Commissioners). If a local government delegates signature authority, a copy of the 17 resolution by the governing body authorizing the signature authority for the individual signing must be provided." For Private Non -Profit: A member of its Board of Directors or whoever has authority to authorize funding for such a project. If this task is delegated down, a copy of a resolution confirming this must be provided. 12. LMS Compliance a) LMS Project List: All proposed projects must be included in the county's Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Project List and must be on file with FDEM's Mitigation Bureau Planning Unit. b) LMS Endorsement Letter: All proposed projects must include an endorsement letter from the county's Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator. You may use 1 letter as long as it includes every proposed project. c) Estimated Costs & Application Costs: The LMS Project List must include an Estimated Cost column and each HMGP project application must be within $500.00 of that Project List's estimated cost. Also ensure that the Federal Cost Share indicated on the LMS Coordinator's Endorsement Letter exactly matches the Federal Cost Share indicated within the application. Ensure the LMS endorsement letter contains both the Total Estimated Projects Cost (Section IV. D.), along with the Estimated Federal Share (Section IV. 1.1.) allocated to this project. A letter of endorsement for the project and its priority number from the Local Mitigation Strategy Project List must be included. Refer to Sample LMS Letter. Applications without a letter of endorsement will not be processed. (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) 13. Previous If the project has been previously submitted under another disaster, provide the Submittal disaster number, the project number, and the title of the project. Section 11- Project Description A. Hazards to be Mitigated/Level of Protection 1. Type of Hazards Type of Hazards the Proposed Project will Mitigate: Identify the hazard(s) that the proposed project will mitigate. More than one hazard may be selected. 2. Identify the Type of Project Identify the Type of Proposed Project: Describe the mitigation project being proposed. (Example: drainage, wind retrofit, generator etc.) a 3. Number of Explain how many people will be protected by or benefit from the proposed project. Persons Protected (Example: A drainage project improving a residential area of 23 homes, with an average household of 2 people = 46 people) 4. Total Impacted Explain how many acres will be impacted from the proposed project: Area Drainage/Berm/Pond/Culverts/Flood hazard projects: combination of the area to be protected and ground disturbance must not exceed 25 acres. 5. Level of Protection Specify the level of protection and magnitude of the event the proposed project will mitigate. Attach support documentation that verifies the stated level of protection. I (Example: In a wind retrofit project, it will be the design wind speed to comply with the Florida Building Code requirements. In a drainage project, it will be the implemented design level, e.g. a 25 -year FDOT design standard for culvert.) 6. Project Impact Identify all the items the project may impact or are within the project area. 7. Engineered Projects (e.g. Drainage) Include available engineering calculations, studies, and designs for the proposed project showing results from applied Recurrence Interval scenarios before and after mitigation. (Number of structures, building replacement value, depth of the water, structural damages, content damages, displacement, road closures, etc.) a B. Project Description, Scope of Work, and Protection Provided (Must be Completed in Detail) 1. Existing Problem Describe the existing problem, location, source of the hazard, and the history and extent of the damage. Include newspaper articles, insurance documentation, photographs, etc. If this project is eligible for PA (406) mitigation activities, describe the 406 activities. 2. Type of Protection Determine how the funding will solve the existing problem and provide protection. 18 3. Scope of Work: What the Project Proposes to Do: Determine the work to be done. The scope of work must meet eligibility based on HMGP regulations and guidance. Explain how the proposed problem will be solved. (NOTE: The proposed project must be a mitigation action, not maintenance.) Does the proposed project solve a problem independently or constitute a functional part of a solution where there is assurance that the project as a whole will be completed (44 CFR 206.434(c][4])? Does the proposed project address a problem that has been repetitive or that poses a significant risk to public health and safety if left unresolved (44 CFR 206.434[c](5](i])? I Projects that merely identify or analyze hazards or problems are not eligible. 4. On -Going or Determine if other projects, zoning changes, etc. are planned (particularly in the Proposed same watershed if flooding is being addressed) that may negatively or positively Projects in the impact the proposed project. If there is a drainage project or downstream issue Area elsewhere, it may eliminate the current flooding issue, erasing the need for the proposed project. Response applies to drainage and acquisition projects. N/A is appropriate in wind retrofit shutter projects only. If this project is also being considered under the Public Assistance Program (406), describe in detail the 406 mitigation activities and/or services. Do not include project costs associated with this HMGP application. Section 111- Project Location A. Site 1. Physical Location List the physical location of the project site(s) including the street number(s), zip code(s) and GPS coordinates (latitude/longitude, in decimal degrees). The physical address must correspond with the address locations specified on maps submitted with the application. AL 2. Titleholder Provide the titleholder's name. 3. Project Seaward of the CCCL? Determine if the project site is located seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. https://floridadep.gov/water/coastal-construction-control-line VI 4. Number and Types of Structures Affected Specify the number and type of properties affected by the project. (Example: Drainage project that affects 100 homes, 15 businesses and 2 schools.) What does the project protect? Should have a number next to the box that is checked. (See Section II, Item A.5 — detail of these totals) B. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Showing Project Site 1. Copies of FIRM Attach a copy (or copies) of the FIRM and clearly identify the project site. The FIRM Panel number must be included. To obtain a FIRM map, go to https://msc.fema.gov/portal. See instructions on How to make a FIRMette. 2. Flood Zone Determination Specify the flood zone(s) of the project site(s). If project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area. Amount of coverage must be equal to or greater than the amount of Federal mitigation funding obligated to the project. 3. Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) Not required if a copy of the FIRM is attached. 4. Model Acknowledgement of Conditions form The Model Acknowledgement of Conditions for Mitigation in Special Flood Hazard Area form is required for those structures receiving federal funds that will also remain in the special flood hazard area by the close of the project. This form is required at application. It can be found on FEMA's website at https://www.fema.gov/media- library/assets/documents/15677 D. C. Maps with Project Site and Photographs 1. City/County Map with Project Site The project site and staging location (if applicable) should be clearly marked on a legible City/County map. The map should be large enough to show the project site. More than one map may be required. Ak 2. USGS TOPO with Project Site The project site should be clearly marked on a legible USGS 1:24,000 TOPO map. To obtain a TOPO map, go to https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/ M 3. Parcel/Tax Map A Parcel, Tax or Property Identification map is required only for acquisition and elevation projects. The location of the structure must be clearly identified. 4. Site Photographs At least four photographs are required that clearly identify the project site. The photos must be representative of the project area, including any relevant streams, 19 creeks, rivers, etc., and drainage areas that affect the project site or will be affected by the project. The front, back and both side angles are required for each structure. For acquisition and elevation projects, a photo taken away from the structure (in front toward the street, and in back toward backyard) to show the area along with photographs of specific elements of the structure affected by the project (windows for shutters or window replacements) should also be provided. Label photographs appropriately. In addition, CDs may be submitted. Section IV - Budget/Costs Make sure all calculations are correct. Provide a breakdown of materials, labor and fees for the proposed project. Support documentation must be attached, i.e. vendor's quote, professional estimate (from engineer, architect, local building official, etc.). The proposed budget line items should represent allowable costs associated with the scope of work. Contingency Cost should be included as a line item in the budget section, and justified — Maximum allowed is 5%, and is required to complete this section; it will be used for the Benefit -Cost Analysis (BCA). Costs should be accurate, complete and reasonable compared to industry standards. Make sure the total cost is correct on the entire application. A. Materials List materials and their associated costs. Provide breakdown. B. Labor Provide a breakdown of description, hours, rate, and cost or lump sum labor cost. Can use in -kind contribution as part of the 25% match. (Attach support documentation for in -kind, in-house to detail wages and salaries charged for any contribution. No overtime wages can be used to satisfy match contributions). C. Fees Paid Provide a breakdown of associated fees i.e., consultants, studies, engineering, permits, and project management. Maintenance is not an allowable cost under HMGP. Pre -award costs may be requested (See Pre -award Costs guidance). D. Total Estimated Project Cost This number includes all project costs without contingency costs included. Make sure all calculations are correct. E. Contingency Cost Per FEMA's HMA Guidance (Section VI Part D.3.4), a contingency cost is, "an allowance in the total cost estimate to cover situations that cannot be fully defined at the time the cost estimate is prepared but that will likely result in additional eligible costs. Allowances for major project scope changes, unforeseen risks, or extraordinary events may not be included as contingency costs." The applicant may request up to 5% of material/labor costs. As with other line items, the applicant must justify these contingency costs based on the nature of the project at application. If an applicant wants to include contingency costs, they will need to enter the percentage that they require as well as what amount they want that percentage to be applied to. Type the resulting calculation in the final cell on the right. These cells will NOT auto -calculate. Be sure that they are calculated correctly. F. Final Project Cost This number includes any contingency costs that were requested. The final BCA will use this number in its final calculation. G. Project Management Costs After reading the guidance provided on pg. 5, select either YES or NO to indicate your need for management costs for this project. If YES, provide a breakdown of description, hours, rate and costs for requested management costs. If NO, continue to Part I. H. Total Estimated Management Costs Requested This will auto complete based on what is entered into the cost cells above. Your request must not exceed 5 percent of the total project cost available for this project. I. Funding Sources (round figures to the nearest dollar) The proposed sources of non-federal matching funds must meet eligibility requirements. (Except as provided by Federal statute, a cost -sharing or matching requirement may not be met by costs borne by another Federal grant.) 2 CFR Part 200.306. 1. Estimated Federal Share The estimated Federal share is generally 75%. If the Federal share is not 75%, assure actual amount is entered. It could be 50.1234% or 35.1234%, etc. of the total dollar amount of project depending on county LMS allocation and priority. This figure cannot exceed 75%. 2. Non -Federal Share May include all 3 sources, i.e. cash, in -kind and global match, as long as the total is a minimum of 25%. Match cannot be derived from a federal agency except Federal funds that lose their federal identity (e.g., CDBG funding and certain tribal funding). 20 3. Cash Cash- Local funding will be utilized for the non-federal share. Enter amount of cash and percentage of total that amount represents. 4. Total In -Kind May use materials, personnel, equipment, and supplies owned, controlled and operated from within governing jurisdiction as an in -kind match. Third party in -kind contributions would be volunteer services, employee services from other organizations furnished free of charge, donated supplies, and loaned equipment or space. The value placed on these resources must be at a fair market value and must be documented. If in -kind is claimed from outside the applicant jurisdiction, it must be cash only. ** Identify proposed eligible activities in Section IV B. and C. as a separate line with In -kind written as a part of the description. 5. Total In-house Sub -Recipient employees, equipment, etc. — internal services (must utilize the Personnel Activity Report or the Equipment Activity Report for the Request for Reimbursement) 6. Total Project Project (global) match must 1) meet all the eligibility requirements of HMGP; and 2) (Global) Match begin after FEMA's approval of the match project. A separate HMGP application must be submitted for global match projects. Indicate which project(s) will be matched. The global match is not required to be an identical project. Projects submitted as global match for another project must meet the same period of performance time constraints as the HMGP. 7. Other Agency Identify Non -Federal Agency and availability date; provide the documentation from Share the agency. (e.g., CDBG funding, and certain tribal funding) 8. Total Funding Total must represent (100%) of the total estimated project cost. Ensure that percentages match corresponding cost -shares and the total matches the Budget (in Section IV. F. - Total Estimated Project Cost). 9. Your requested amount must be equal to or less than 5 percent of the total project cost J. Project Milestones/Schedule of Work 1. Milestones (Schedule) Identify the major milestones in the proposed project and provide an estimated time- line (e.g. Designing, Engineering — 3 months, Permitting — 6 months, Procurement — 30 days, Installation — 6 months, Contracting — 1 month, Delays, Project Implementation, Inspections, Closeout, etc.) for the critical activities not to exceed a period of 3 years (36 -months) for performance. Milestones should not be grouped together but listed individually. Allot for the appropriate amount of time for final inspection and closeout (about 3 months). El Section V - Environmental Review & Historic Preservation Compliance No work can begin prior to the completion of the environmental (NEPA) review. In order for the Environmental staff to conduct the NEPA review, all sections listed below must be completed. 1. Description, SOW & Budget Detailed Project Description, Scope of Work & Budget/Costs. Complete Sections II & IV of the application. I 2. Area Maps Project area Maps - Attach a copy of the maps and clearly mark the project site, and place the specific project structure(s) on map(s). Complete Section III, part B & C of the application. 3. Project Area/Structure Photographs Complete Section III part C of the application. 4. Preliminary Project Plans For shutters see the scope of work and for drainage & elevation see engineering drawings. I 5. Project Alternatives Complete Section V part D. of this application. 6. Project Worksheets Dates of construction are required for all structures. See worksheets. I 7. Environmental Justice Documentation See Section V.B for applicable information. 1 8. Information/ Documentation Provide any of the required documentation as listed at the end of Section V in the Information and Documentation Requirements by Project Type that may have already been obtained. 21 Requirements by Project Type B. Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice for Low Income and Minority Population 1. Disproportionate Effects Determine if there are populations in either the project zip code or city that are characterized as having a minority background or living below the poverty level. If yes, complete the rest of Section V, part B. Describe any disproportionate effects that these populations would experience if the project were completed. Nr 2. Population Affected Describe the population affected by this project and the portion of the population adversely impacted. Attach any documentation and list the attachments here. C. Information re ' uired for Tribal Consultation Documentation for Tribal Consultation For all projects with any ground disturbing activities of 3 inches or more, complete Section V part C. D. Alternative Actions 1. No Action Alternative Discuss the impacts on the project area if no action is taken. A 2. Other Feasible Alternative Action This is a FEMA and FDEM requirement for any Application Review. A narrative discussion of at least three project alternatives (from No Action to the most effective, practical solution) and their impacts, both beneficial and detrimental is required. It is expected that the jurisdiction has completed sufficient analysis to determine the proposed project can be constructed as submitted and it supports the goals and objectives of the FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan. Has the proposed project been determined to be the most practical, effective and environmentally sound alternative after consideration of a range of options? (44 CFR 206.434[c][5][iii]) a a. Project Description It is very important and a requirement that an Alternative project is submitted. NEPA requires that at least three alternatives must be presented to mitigate the problem. In addition to the proposed action and no action, one other feasible alternative must be provided. Describe the surrounding environment. Include information regarding both natural (Le., fish, wildlife, streams, soils, plant life) and built (i.e., public services, utilities, land/shoreline use, population density) environments. Describe how the alternative project will solve the problem and provide protection from the hazard. Provide enough detail to describe the project for the evaluation panel to decide the best course of action for the state. Include any appropriate diagrams, sketch maps, amount of materials and equipment, dimensions of project, amount of time required to complete, etc. Total cost is required. Detailed line items are not required. Just enter a total amount. b. Project Location of the Alternative c. Scope of Work — Alternative Project d. Impacts of the Alternative Project e. Estimated Budget/Costs for the Alternative Project Materials, Labor, and Fees Paid Total Estimated Project Costs Total cost is required. Vendor quote is not required. A lump sum budget may be submitted as justification to why this alternative was not chosen. Section VI — Maintenance A. reement Maintenance Agreement Complete, sign and date the maintenance agreement. The maintenance agreement must be signed by an individual with signature authority, preferably the authorized agent. Other Required Documentation Go to www.floridadisaster.org/dem/mitigation/hazard-mitigation-grant-program/ for additional documents 1. Maps All maps must be included with the application. 2. FFATA Form During contracting with the state, complete, sign and date the FFATA Project File Form. Instructions are provided for your convenience in the document provided. This is not required at the time of application submittal. 22 3. SFHA Acknowledgement of Conditions Required for all projects in the Special Flood Hazard Area. Read and sign the SFHA Acknowledgement of Conditions document. This form must be notarized, signed by the local jurisdiction and the property owner. 4. Pre -award Cost Form If pre -award costs are being requested with your project, be sure to identify all pre - award costs in the application budget per instructions. The pre -award cost form must be completed and submitted with your application. 5. Request for Public Assistance Form Applicable if no FIPS number is assigned to applicant/recipient. 6. Model Statement of Assurances for Property Acquisition Projects For Acquisition projects only. 7. Declaration and Release For Acquisition projects only. Must be signed by all persons whose names are on the property deed. 8. Notice of Voluntary Interest For Acquisition projects only. Two forms are available for your convenience. Use the form that is most appropriate to your situation. Must be signed by all persons whose names are on the property deed. 9. Statement of Voluntary Participation for Acquisition of Property for Purpose of Open Space For Acquisition projects only. Must be signed by all persons whose names are on the property deed. 10. Worksheets The appropriate worksheet(s) must be completed and submitted with the application. a. Flood Control — Drainage Improvement b. Generator c. Tornado Safe Room d. Hurricane Safe Room e. Wind Retrofit f. Wildfire g. Drought *Submit 1 original (signed) and 1 full copy of the entire application and backup documentation. Include a full copy of the submittal and all documentation on CD or thumb drive. 23 Attachment Index Use the following template to list any supporting documentation that is included on the CD or flashdrive. Clearly and concisely label each attachment on this form to correspond with the file name on the CD or flashdrive. In the first column list which section and item (from the HMGP application) the attachment refers to. Example: Section 2, Item 1. If any required documentation is not included on the CD or flashdrive, the application will be considered incomplete and will not be considered for possible funding. Section # & Item Attached Document Name 1 1 B-12 Miami -Dade County LMS - HMGP - Hurrican Ian Support Letter 8-11-23 2 I I I A-1 Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange Location Map Opa-locka 3 I II A-2 Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange Site Control Opa-locka 4 111 B-1 Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange FIRM Map Opa-locka 5 III C-2 Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange USGS Map Opa-locka 6 I II C-4 Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange Photographs Opa-locka 7 IV Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange Budget Workbook Opa-locka 8 V7 Zone 1 and 2 Roads Drainange Disadvantaged Map Opa-locka 9 V 1 HMGP Opinion of Cost - Zone 1-2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 24 Q Application Successfully Submitted IMPORTANT NOTE: Documents attached within the application will not be visible within the application document for signature. Please be sure prior to uploading the required documents into the application that they are valid and approved. For questions or assistance concerning the HMGP application, state HMGP staff can be reached through the following methods. Phone: (850) 815-4524 Email: DEM Hazard Mitigation You may also refer to the HMGP Application Checklist for additional guidance. HMGP APPLICATION Application Number Application Status PID-142465 Submitted Application Created Date Application Due Date 8/21/2023, 3:47 PM 8/30/2023 MyFlorida.com Contact Us Open Government FDEM Long Range Program Plan Employment © 2023 FDEM 1 All rights reserved. City of Opa-locka Agenda Cover Memo City Manager: Darvin Williams CM Signature: Commission Meeting Date: Item Type: (EnterX in box) Resolution Ordinance Other X Fiscal Impact: (EnterX in box) Yes No Ordinance Reading. (EnterXinbox) 1st Reading 2nd Reading X Public Hearing: (Enter X in box) Yes No Yes No X X Funding Source: Account# : (Enter Fund & Dept) Ex: NA Advertising Requirement: (EnterX in box) Yes No Contract/P.O. Required: (EnterX in box) Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid#: X Strategic Plan Related (EnterX in box) Yes No Strategic Plan Priority Enhance Organizational Bus. & Economic Dev Public Safety Quality of Education Qual. of Life & City Image Communication Area: • Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy: (list the specific objective/strategy this item will address) X • MI � IN Sponsor Name Commissioner Williams Department: City Commission Short Title: Hazzard Mitigation Grant Application Staff Summary: Staff believes it is in the best interest of the City to submit a Hazzard Mitigation Grant application for $2.41 million dollars (City match of $0.80 million). If received the grant would be used to improve drainage in the southwest quadrant of the City. (Zones #1 and #2 as indicated in the attachment). Financial Impact - A successful application will result in the City receiving $2.41 million dollars in FY 24 to further address the City's flooding issues. The City match of $0.8 million would be sourced from ARPA funds. Proposed Action: Staff recommends that the City Commission authorize the Interim City Manager to sign a Hazzard Mitigation Grant application for $2.41 million to mitigate flooding issues in Zones #1 and #2. Attachment: 1. Zones #1 & #2 MIAMIDADE COUNT Y August 11, 2023 Mrs. Laura Dhuwe, State Hazard Mitigation Officer Florida Division of Emergency Management 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Department of Emergency Management Local Mitigation Strategy 9300 NW 41 St Miami, FL 33178 Email: eocna,miamidade.gov Phone: 305-468-5427 Fax: 305-468-5401 Re: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) FEMA 4673 -DR -FL, Hurricane Ian LMS Project Priority List and Support Letter Dear Mrs. Dhuwe, The Miami -Dade County Local Mitigation Strategy Working (LMS) working group approved and supports the mitigation projects listed in the enclosure "Prioritized Project List for FEMA 4673 - DR -FL, Hurricane lan". These projects align with our LMS goals and objectives, and with the State's mitigation goals and objectives (in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations 44§ 201.6). Furthermore, the LMS partners submitting projects, are continuing participants in the Miami -Dade County LMS working group. The projects in question are all listed in our LMS project list. The Miami -Dade County LMS working group therefore presents the projects below to be considered for funding. For further information or inquiry, please contact me at (305) 468-5427 or robin.yanca.miamidade.gov Sincerely, 7r. 3 Robin Yang, LMS Chair Miami -Dade County LMS Enclosure: Prioritized Project List for FEMA 4673 -DR -FL, Hurricane Ian Prioritized Project List for FEMA 4673 -DR -FL, Hurricane Ian Funding Priority Pr oject Titl e Applica nt Goal/Objective Implemented Estimated Tot al Pr oj ect C ost Estimated Federal Sh are 1 Citywide Lift & Pump Station Backup Pumps City of Florida City Goal 2 $330,500.00 $247,875.00 2 City of Miami Fire Training Center City of Miami Goal 6 $3,062,879 .29 $2,297,159.47 3 Matheson Hammock Mangrove Trail Miami -Dad e C ounty Parks, R ecreation and Opens Spaces Department Goal 1 $4,994,890.00 $2,500,000.00 4 Emergency Shelter Generator R eplacement Mactown Goal 6 $548,002.00 $411,001 .50 5 Miami -Dade Fire Rescue Stations 03, 54, 55, & 56 G ener ator Installm ents Miami -Dad e C ounty Fire Rescue D epartment Goal 2 $571,400 .00 $428,550.00 6 Ge nerator Re pla ce me nt for Water Treatment F acility N orth Miami Beach Goal 6 $1,000,000.00 $750,000.00 7 Roof, Wind and Enclo sure Protection M ount Sinai M edical Cent er Goal 2 $3,000,000 .00 $2,250,000.00 8 Stormwater Drainage and Roadway Improvements to NE 191 Street Syst em City of Av entura Goal 1 $6,500,000 .00 $5,200,000.00 9 Stormwater Piimn Statio n 1 P. 7 mime ren lare ment and iinnracles We st Miami Canal 7 .4571 non 00 S49R 950 00 10 Zone 1 & 2 Roads Drainage City of Opa-locka Go al 1 $3,213,986.00 $2,410,489.00 11 Generator Installation at Critical Facilities Miami Shores Goal 6 $750,000 .00 $562,500 .00 12 PD/City Hall Hardening Village of Virginia Gardens Goal 1 $1,100,000.00 $825,000 .00 13 Youth Center Emergency Generator City of Coral Gables Goal 6 $350,000 .00 $262,500 .00 14 Citywide Lift & Pump Station Bac kup Generators City of Florida City Goal 2 $280,236 .84 $210,177.63 15 Flood Gates/Doors Mount Sinai Medical Center Goal 2 $300,000 .00 $225,000.00 16 Miami -Dade Fire Rescue Statio ns 03, 38, & 46 Hardening Project Including Roof Miami -Dade County Fire Rescue Department Goal 2 $1,773,756.00 $1,330,317 .00 17 City of M iami Fire Statio n #5 City of Miami Go al 6 $500,000.00 $375,000 .00 18 Emergency Power G enerato r for Po lice & Emergency Operations Center City of Aventura Goal 2 $550,000 .00 $412,500.00 19 Coral Gables Country Club Emergency Generator City of Coral Gables Goal 6 $800,000 .00 $600,000.00 20 City Critical Facilities Backup Generators Citywide City of Florida City Go al 2 $707,425 .28 $530,568.96 21 Miami -Dade Fire Rescue Stations 34, 36, 53, & 56 Hardening Project Miami -Dade County Fire Rescue Department Goal 2 $2,522,700 .00 $1,892,025 .00 22 City of Miami Fire Statio n #7 City of M iami Go al 6 $810,000.00 $607,500.00 23 Continuation of Citywide Flood Drainage - Phase 3 City of Florida City Goal 2 $2,861,414 .16 $2,146,060 .62 24 Friedland Manor Pump Stations & Dry Re tention Pond Restora tion City of Florida City Go al 2 $1,383,031 .18 $1,037,273.39 25 Kendall Campus, bldg 7000 Miami Dade College Goal 3 $258,073.20 $193,554.90 26 City of Miami Springs: Erosion Control and Stabilization of Drainage City of M iami Springs Goal 3 $1,281,383 .00 $961,037.00 27 Citywide Flo od/Dra inage Mitigation Improvements at Loca tions of Known Floo ding City of Miami Go al 2 $1,000,000.00 $750,000 .00 Fu nding Priority Project Title Applica nt Goal/Objective Implem ented Estimated T otal Project C ost Estimated Federal Share 28 Construct Pump Station in K-8 Stormwater Basin Village of Key Biscayne Goal 2 $10,766,232.00 $8,074,674.00 29 Viz caya Structures Envelope Restoration & Wind Storm Protection Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust, Inc. G oal 2 $3,900,000.00 $2,925,000.00 30 EOC Generator and Enclosure University of Miami Goal 6 $972,705.00 $729,528.75 31 130-1 nw 99TH Terrace Corrid or T own of Medley Goal 3 $2,034,000.00 $1,526,025.00 32 MDC-West Administrative Bldg Miami Dade College Goal 3 $5,714,494 .80 $4,285,871.10 33 Vizcaya Drainage Improv ement -East side of estate Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust, Inc . Goal 2 $1,800,000.00 $1,350,000.00 34 Homestead Campus Bldg B Miami Dade College Goal 3 $749,609.70 $562,207 .28 35 Vizcaya M useum and Gardens Seawalls Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust, Inc. Goal 2 $1,250,000 .00 $937,500 .00 36 Se condary Ba ckup Gene rato r City of Homestead Police D ep artment Goal 6 $449,844.00 $224,922.00 37 Emergency By -Pass Pump Sanita ry/Sto rm City of Coral Gables Goal 6 $200,000 .00 $150,000 .00 38 Zone 3, 4 & 5 Roads Drainage City of Opa-lo cka Goal 1 $21,577,269.00 $16,182,952 .00 Pay Item Number Sub Basin FDOT Pay Item No -OPC-N-1-2 Roadway & Stormwater Infrastructur e D escripti on Construction Unit Costs August 2023 Adj usted Unit Price (Pri ority Quantity 1 A) C ost SW -001 0425 1361 Drainage Structures w/ baffles (Curb Inlets) EA $5,000.00 40 $200,000 SW -002 0425 2 41 Drainage Structures (MAS) EA $5,000 .00 13 $65,000 SW -003 430174124 430174118 24 -inch Solid Pipe LF $150.00 0 $0 SW -004 18 -inch Solid Pipe LF $125 .00 1100 $137,500 SW -005 0443 70 4 24 -inches di ameter Exfiltrati on Tr ench es (Fr ench Drains) (6' Width, 15.00 ft deep )(@75% c orridor length) LF $186.00 5800 $1,078,800 SW -006 0334 1 53 Furnish and Place 2 -inch Asphalt Concrete Pavement TN $190 .00 1173 $222,933 SW -007 0334 1 53 Furnish and Place 3 -inch Asphalt Concrete Pavement TN $200.00 0 $0 SW -008 285706 Furnish and Place 8 -inch Limerock Base Material SY $40.00 10933 $437,333 SW -009 285711 Furnish and Place 12 -inch Limerock Base Material SY $48.00 0 $0 SW -010 0160 4 Compaction/Stabilizatio n of 12 -inch Subgrade SY $5.00 5333 $26,667 SW -011 0327 70 Mill 1 -inch Asphalt Concrete SY $3.00 0 $0 SW -012 0520 2 4 Furinsh and Install Type D Curb LF $23 .00 0 $0 SW -013 0520 3 Furinsh and Install Valley Gutter (3') LF $30.00 0 $0 SW -014 0520 1 10 Fumish and Install Type F Curb and Gutter LF $25 .00 8000 $200,000 SW -015 0522 2 Concrete Sidewalk 6 -inch (with Wiremesh) SY $30 .00 5333 $160,000 SW -016 0570 1 2 Performance Turf (includes top soil, watering) SY $2.50 4444 $11,111 SW -017 N/A Pavement Marking/Signage SY $1.00 10667 $10,667 GC -001 N/A Mobilization / Demobiliza tion LS 5 .00% 1 $95,336 GC -002 N/A Insurance & Ge neral Conditio ns LS 2.50% 1 $47,668 GC -003 N/A Maintenance of Traffic LS 2.75% 1 $52,435 GC -004 N/A SWPPP LS 0.50% 1 $9,534 GC -005 N/A Allowance for Unforeseen Utilities Relocation LS 1. 50% 1 $28,801 GC 006 N/A Allowance for Unforeseen Environmental Conditions LS 1. 25% 1 $238,384 GC -007 N/A Allowance for Other ROW Improvement LS 1.00% 1 $19,067 GC -008 N/A Permits LS 0.30% 1 $5,720 Subtotal $3,046,956 5% Contigency (Planning, A dministrative, Design & Construction Contigency Costs) $152,348 TO TA L $3,199,304 $3,200,000 Prepared by: EIOpir EA C Consulting, Inc. Section IV. Budget/Costs I D# _-_-R (_) This section, provide details of all the estimated costs of the project. As this information is used for the Benefit -Cost Analysis, reasonable cost estimates are essential. Pre -Award Costs, Project Management, and any Contingency (maximum 5%) need to be reported as separate line items. All cost estimates rounded to the nearest dollar. A. Materials: Any Material utilized to complete project (include acquistion of property) Item Unit Qtv Cost / Unit Cost Drainage Structures/Pipe 1 $888,780.00 $888,780.00 Asphalt Concrete 1 $133,759.00 $133,759.00 Limerock Base Material 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Curb and Gutter 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 Concrete 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Turf 1 $6,111.00 $6,111.00 Signs/Marking 1 $5,667.00 $5,667.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 8/31/2023; Reviewed and Approved by PM: Submitted/Approved by SR: B. Labor: Include equipment costs. Please indicate all "soft", In-house(***), or In -kind matches -donated (**). Description of Task Qtv Rate Cost Phase I - $0.00 Phase I - $0.00 Phase I - $0.00 Phase I - $0.00 Phase I ONLY- Sub -total $0.00 Drainage Structures/Pipe 1 $592,520.00 $592,520.00 Asphalt Concrete 1 $89,173.00 $89,173.00 Limerock Base Material 1 $264,000.00 $264,000.00 Curb and Gutter 1 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 Concrete Install 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Turf 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Utilities Relocation 1 $28,801.00 $28,801.00 Environmental Conditions 1 $238,384.00 $238,384.00 ROW Restoration 1 $19,067.00 $19,067.00 Install Signs/Markings 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Non -Phased or Phase 11- Sub -total $1,421,945.00 Sub -Total $1,421,945.00 C. Fees Paid Include any other costs associated with the project. Description of Task Qt Rate Cost Phase I - Pre -Award with start date of J / $0.00 Phase I - Professional Engineering Services $0.00 Phase I - $0.00 Phase 1- $0.00 Phase I - $0.00 Phase 1 - $0.00 Phase I - $0.00 Phase 1 ONLY- Sub -total $0.00 Non -Phased - Pre -Award with start date of / / $0.00 Engineering 1 $327,724.00 $327,724.00 Permits 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 8/31/2023; Reviewed and Approved by PM: Submitted/Approved by SR: $o.00 $o.00 $o,00 $o.00 $o.00 $o.00 $o.00 $o.00 $o.00 Non -Phased or Phase 11- Sub -total $377,724.00 Sub -Total $377,724.00 D. Sub -Total Estimated Project Cost $3,213,986.00 E. Contingency Costs (max 5%) Phase I Contingency Costs (max 5%) Non -Phased or Phase II Total Contingency Costs (maximum 5%) F. 0.000% 0.000% $0.00 $3,213,986.00 $3,213,986.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Note: Backup source documentation is required to support costs Final Estimated Project Costs $3,213,986.00 Phase I Subtotal Non -Phased or Phase 11 Subtotal $0.00 $3,213,986.00 $3,213,986.00 Comments: Federal Project Cost Federal Share Percentage Requesting (per LMS) 74.999984443% Sub -Recipient Federal Amount Endorsed by LMS $ 2,410,489.00 FEMA Approval 00/00/00 8/31/2023; Reviewed and Approved by PM: Submitted/Approved by SR: CITY OF OPA LOCKA FLORIDA "EPA EJScreen EPA. Environment, Justice smiling an. Mapping Tool IWI,OP U) A Pisan al Wo,ddp M4.1 Wdo County,Fbddnbet 13086006503ftTwbOon: 7,548 Hashh Housing Log, nolkaion Puhlie Mousing 88 rustic unRA ILPAina omewnsegad camm�at s� 1 9alRt1'4i7 1 7anNialo I Li.-,\3c�kti�a e m. iTie 0 ! �7a1 l Fi f8C�f6v`.'kl9 c fti2s�.. flmalaxtm �Ffll�'�,iFi I The Project Site is located in a Miami -Dade County US Census tract 12086000503 that has been designated as Disadvantage by the Justice40 Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) in 7 categories of Energy, Health, Housing, Legacy Pollution, Transportation, Water and wastewater, and Workforce Development. !I Low- and Moderate -Income Area Data, based on 2011-2015 ACS Source Stusab Countyname State County Tract Blckgrp Low Lowmod Lmmi Lowmoduniv Lowmod pct uclowmod ucLowmad_p MOE_Lowmod MOE_ucLowm 2015AC5 geoname Block Group 3, Census Tract 5.03, Miami -Dade County, Florida FL Miami -Dade County 12 86 503 3 1120 1190 1190 1190 100 +/-49.83 The project Site is located in Block Group 3 of Miami -Dade Census tract 5.03 and is reported by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to have a Low to Moderate Income (LMI) level of 100%. booty,.g oaM.p.µ b0o&.md Wapa3 600Z'II tl38N31d3S 03SIAMId Vd 1611039600 a3ewnN dWW AIMYI (in0AV .Va 1. 141104 x37.11dyn 335, IE01 i0 614 13NVd SV33V 0 31V t0d30J Ni O NV VO R1013 'A1N003 3Q tl0"I1NVIIN dtlW 31621 30NYthISNI 00011 wain 0 -ma z.sp1 -0 0 0 6Z61. • .MIPoon.Mod.w oon. au 03 Pom.ua 'mum wom mom Pomo: LT.4 13, (SMo)5y3uv031a0& anM tnu o 5"3x.(s,�,p,3��s�t,l�3-4tt3(ttl45r,5y� � S SW 000 1iN 31410 T 3x0 x Sv3ne♦ yMa00ei _ x u.vaNnw 0i1.33ren s S /3ay OWEV3 000, x0335 ow mt. 0N6031 mn.0 0 3X54 9. 73Ntl d SNP' IA PVe �Inw�me(la u, ?. .ge eY� Quemla nuee7 ume a ':Fl i Po mi q Nu nm oo ode dm New umdm do poi l0 dow.niu.m up,0i.mul dn.wood Am Nda.o. oNp n vwudm pqum pno w pMndnu"wmme an aw +mn P pmaemmm—7 d ews, coma.. w (MPv�non wnnu 0l. .u p 0. P. m 11 P. Am 5 a>unns( il d °w n ..nn n .0 o nnuou 4 MO °nYud p. ndw u. on Pc uolo.nul wx�m Poo (. V OA mmd Vl u0 uxv c oo, ury� .u.p40,m 11.3 w wnm . d• Poo Pol on,. mw mmu env mi uM 0 ON m.14 O. n0 n1 Q m Zwnmpemo>a I° a�w 1'47 w ▪ b mum, I4 Ip ul "p nuns .,1211,'„ uo �°M°p°,<"I nauunn um' sa le ul na. um on Intl,/ non la ki n, 4114 0•09 14••0414 P wp.e m uolnn mri.ml ,ppu•n uppro u>mo uoe.mp yam n nm ,Lou) ate.,Onss Anon o nnuu Omunt un Po,On O PPO .O. 1. 04• N .11 01 poomajw M M. op amxl sexu as n;a °u�:�vw;o N&P Tim a� u�p ,.I ,m,.(m q . gtll3 ° mop. 1.1011 pw.w. m op im . qa nns mw4 .amen �p °p..eue.h:�dpnn �olvNai N°i 1041 p ovu :17;:r= mo q pm px p 0g4 1 0msul N . .m unw v opp nJo °�(ax OAON1 emfJa p°w°I n° .0 pap, awwo .0 nu cumsx b0 p wmpuq mO°.pm dn..NI w umup .wpu .p 10013 11 .0 0 l uomOvuewa NWI °mw NOv oe nM��&„. won (S U) b se uum w noun annomwm u son s ;nu= G''" uuown' pan nw+uew r0°owlu.� T:rto 732 ol 910. 0, • mp. bnlmrveau tr 1oI"= rutuo7 m i 1 opOn =701!p pu °mo SN3Sl 01 5310N MITIGATION Flood Control - Drainage Improvement Worksheet For preliminary Benefit Cost Analysis conducted by the State Mitigation Technical Team Applies for the following mitigation activities: FLOOD CONTROL — DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT (FLOOD RISK REDUCTION) projects which include drainage improvements, roadway/bridge elevation, flood protection measures for utility systems, floodplain and stream restoration, flood diversion, flood diversion and storage measures, and non -localized flood risk. For assistance, contact the State of Florida Mitigation Technical Unit. IMPORTANT: This worksheet is required as part of your application. The State of Florida Mitigation Technical Unit will conduct a Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) for your project and the following information is needed to evaluate cost effectiveness. Once a preliminary BCA is completed, the reviewer will contact you to collect support documentation. NOTE: A complete worksheet will expedite the Technical Review. Requirements To complete a successful project application, a minimum amount of technical information is required for review. Data collected in this worksheet will provide reviewers with preliminary information necessary to evaluate project eligibility, feasibility, and cost effectiveness. Carefully review and confirm that you are aware of the following information. All flood risk reduction projects must dearly define the level of protection the project provides and shall be designed in strict compliance with Federal, State and Local applicable Rules and Regulations. It is recommended that the sub -applicant consult a professional engineer to assist in preparing the application, as many of the documentation requirements are technical in nature. An engineer will be required for design and implementation. Initial funds may be obtained to produce detailed designs of the project (Phase 1) for further FEMA review and approval prior to construction (Phase 2). Proposed flood risk reduction projects must be for the purpose of increasing risk reduction capabilities of the existing structures and cannot constitute only repairs. Additionally, they must demonstrate that the project will not have negative impacts upstream or downstream of the project area. Localized flood risk reduction projects may not constitute a section of a larger flood control system. I confirm that l have reviewed the requirements listed above (signature): hy. 4-0.14. EC5929C4FFB9414... For additional resources, please refer to FEMA Technical Review Job Aid for Flood Risk Reduction projects. Section 1 - Project General Information Project Name: City of Opa-locka Zones 1 and 2 Drainage and Roadway Improvements Sub -Applicant: City of Opa-locka Section 11 - Project Cost Information A Mitigation Project Cost: $3,213,986 A Worksheet completed by: Name: Adelina Gross Title: Capital Improvement Manager Phone: 305-953-2821 Email: agross@opalockafl.gov A Annual Maintenance Cost: $8,500 Page 1 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control — Drainage Worksheet Section III - Project Specific Information 0 Project location: Cairo Lane, Opa-locka, FL N 25.8933071, W -80.2577659 Type of mitigation measures you are proposing for this project: (Select all that apply) A E Drainage Improvements 0 ✓❑ Flood Protection Measures for (Stormwater Management) Utility Systems A ❑ Roadway/Bridge Elevation A ❑ Other (provide a brief description): A Are you proposing a Phased or Non - Phased flood control project? A Does the proposed project include land purchasing? A ❑ Flood Diversion and Storage Measures A ❑ Floodplain and Stream Restoration A ❑ Non -Localized Flood Risk Reduction ❑ Phased Project ❑ Non -Phased Project ✓❑ No ❑ Yes (provide brief explanation): Section IV - Historical Damage Information A flood control project is expected to reduce floods risks to several facilities, including buildings, roads, and utilities. The following sub- sections provide guidance to better identify the benefits (avoided losses) that are expected with the implementation of the proposed project, using information from past flooding events. 1. Roadway/Bridges Loss of Function WiII the proposed project mitigate the loss of service due to past flood events at a roadway or bridge? ❑✓ Yes, complete Table 1 below. E No, continue to Sub -section 2 - Historical Damage Information Table 1. The table below allows for listing the road(s) and/or bridge(s) that have been impacted by flood events. Please complete the information requested on each column using the best available information. If additional structures need to be listed, please attached a document with the information requested below. 0 Road/Bridge Location Cairo Lane A Storm Name A Date of Flood Event 0 Estimated One - 0 Additional 0 Additional Reroute Way Traffic Trips Miles for per Day Time Reroute (hrs./days) 0 Road/Bridge Closure Duration (hrs./days) Page 2 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control — Drainage Worksheet Section IV — Historical Damage Information (continued) 2. Building Damages Will the proposed project reduced physical ❑ Yes, complete Table 2 below. damages and/or displacement costs to residential and/or non-residential buildings? ❑ No, continue to Sub -section 3 - Historical Damage Information Table 2. The table below allows for listing the location of residential and/or nonresidential building(s) that have experienced flood damages in the past and are expected to benefit from the proposed project. Please complete the information requested on each column using the best available information. If additional structures need to be listed, please attached a document with the information requested below. 0 Properly Location (address) A Storm Name A Date of Flood Event A Flood Depth Above Finished Floor (ft.) A Documented Losses ($) A If people trapped, how long? (hrs.) Page 3 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control — Drainage Worksheet Section IV - Historical Damage Information (continued) 3. Avoided Emergency Management Costs Has the City incurred on any expenses attending the emergencies during past events that would be avoided with the implementation of the proposed project? ❑ Yes, complete Table 3 below. ❑ No, continue to Sub -section 4 - Loss of Critical Function Table 3. The table below allows for identifying expenses incurred by the sub -applicant attending emergencies related to the flood risks being mitigated. Please complete the information requested on each column using the best available information. If additional structures need to be listed, please attached a document with the information requested below. A Emergency 0 Date of Location Flood Event 4. Loss of Critical Function Will the proposed project reduce the loss of function of a critical facility? 0 Emergency Expense Description ° Cost of Emergency Expense ($) ❑ Yes, complete the Tables 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5, as applicable. ❑ No, continue to Section V - Professional Expected Damages Please complete the tables below, as applicable. If additional facilities are impacted, please attach a separate table with the complete list of structures with the responses to the columns below Table 4.1 Fire Station A Property Location (Address) A Date of Flood Event *EMS: Emergency Medical Services OProperty Location °Date of (Address) flood event ° Population served by the Station Does the Station provide EMS*? -Select- -Select- 0 Address of the nearest fire station Table 4.2 Police Station ° Population served by the Station How many police officers work or report to this police station? Address of the 0 Loss Of nearest fire station Service/Function with EMS* Duration (hrs./days) ° How many police 0 Loss Of officers have a Service/Function designated office space Duration at this police station? (hrs./days) Page 4 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control — Drainage Worksheet Section IV - Historical Damage Information (continued) °Property Location 0 Date of (Address) flood event ° Property Location (Address) ° Date of flood event Table 4.3 Hospital 0 How many Provide the address of the people are being nearest hospital capable of served by this providing the same type of hospital? service: Table 4,4 Utility 0 Type of Utility - Select - - Select - - Select - A How many people are being served by the nearest hospital capable of providing the same type of service? ° Number of customers directly served by the utility system: Table 4.5 Other Critical Facility Type ° Property Location 0 Date of flood Provide a brief explanation on why it is considered a (Address) event critical facility ° Facility Annual Operational Budget ° Loss Of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days) ° Loss Of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days) ° Loss Of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days) Page 5 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control — Drainage Worksheet Section V - Professional Expected Damage Information ° Complete the tables below if a preliminary or final H&H study is available. Using your H&H results, please provide before and after mitigation data based on the modeled scenarios: 0 Professional Expected Damages BEFORE Mitigation 0 Estimated 0 Estimated 0 Recurrence Structural Content 0 Displacement Interval Damage Damage Cost ($) ($) ($) 0 Property Location (address) °Property Location (address) A Professional Expected Damages AFTER Mitigation 0 Estimated 0 Estimated °Recurrence Structural Content 0 Displacement Interval Damage Damage Cost ($) ($) ($) A Road Closures (hrs.) A Road Closures (hrs.) Page 6 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control — Drainage Worksheet Section VI — Additional Information Please use this page to expand on the information provided above or to include any additional information relevant to the proposed mitigation project. Cairo Lane Between NW 135 Street and NW 127 Street Canal Drainage & Roadway Improvements: Cairo Lane is located between NW 135th Street and NW 127th Street Canal. It is one of the most important Roads in the city as it serves a lot of businesses. It has no working drainage system and the road surface is damaged and now functions like a dirt road. Due to the non-existence of any drainage system and damaged roadway surface the stormwater runoff from Cairo Lane impacts the surface water quality of NW 127th Street Canal. The stormwater runoff from the south portion of Cairo Lane gets into the canal without any kind of pre-treatment. The Cairo Lane Drainage and Roadway Improvements project consist in completing the construction a drainage system to divert runoff from rain as well as the complete reconstruction of approximately 0.55 miles of roadway with sidewalks and relocation/ construction of utilities. The installation of the drainage system will utilize collection inlets and French drains to mitigate current flooding and reduce past damages to vehicles and businesses. The roadway has to be designed for heavy traffic loads. Page 7 of 7 Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency Management MITIGATION Flood Control - Drainage Improvement Worksheet FLOOD CONTROL - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS Refer to the instructions below to complete the Flood Control — data. Section I - Project General Information Project Name: Enter the name of the project title. The title should be short but descriptive (e.g., City of Orlando, Basin 3 Floodgate, Drainage). Sub -Applicant: Enter your organization's legal name. Worksheet completed by: Enter name, title, phone number, and email of the person completing this Worksheet. This person must have the knowledge and/or the resources to accurately answer all questions and provide supporting documentation, as needed. Information may come from multiple creditable sources. Section II - Project Cost Information Mitigation Project Cost: Enter the total cost of the project. A lump sum on this worksheet is acceptable for preliminary BCA, but a detailed breakdown attached to your application is required. Annual Maintenance Cost: Enter the cost associated with maintaining the effectiveness of the components installed as part of the proposed mitigation project. Section III - Project Specific Information Project Location: Provide a clear delineation of areas disturbed to construct the project, including potential off -site areas such as spoils disposal locations. For multiple locations, please provide information on Section VIII of this worksheet. Type of mitigation proposed: A flood control project can include a combination of multiple mitigation activities. From the options provided, please check all the mitigation actions that apply to your project. • Drainage Improvements (Stormwater Management): Stormwater management is defined as efforts to reduce the impact of increased runoff that results from new development in a watershed. Stormwater management projects include the construction, installation or modification of culverts, drainage pipes, pumping stations, floodgates, bioswales, detention and retention basins, and other stormwater management facilities. • Roadway/Bridge Elevation: Mitigation measures to provide flood protection and stabilization measures for roads and bridges. • Flood Protection Measures for Utility Systems: Mitigation actions to provide flood protection for water and sanitary sewer systems or other utility systems. Drainage Improvement Mitigation Worksheet using the best available • Flood Diversion and Storage Measures: Flood diversion and storage projects are climate resilient mitigation actions. These projects involve diverting floodwaters from a stream, river or other body of water into a wetland, floodplain, canal, pipe, or other conduit (e.g., tunnels, wells) and storing them in aboveground reservoirs, floodplains, wetlands, green infrastructure elements or other storage facilities that allow for a controlled release to reduce the peak flows and velocities to mitigate flooding. • Floodplain and Stream Restoration: These projects restore and enhance the floodplain, stream channel and riparian ecosystem's natural function. They provide baseflow recharge, water supply augmentation, floodwater storage, terrestrial and aquatic wildlife habitat by restoring the site's soil, hydrology and vegetation conditions that mimic the pre -development, or pre -alteration natural channel/floodplain connectivity. Floodplain and stream restoration projects typically encompass the restoration of the stream's active channel and streambanks, as well as the adjacent floodplain and riparian zones. • Non -Localized Flood Risk Reduction: Non -localized flood risk reduction measures are those actions or projects that lessen the frequency or severity of flooding and decrease predicted flood damage within an area that is hydraulically linked or connected to a drainage basin that is regional in scale. These projects reduce flood hazards in areas larger than those of localized flood risk reduction projects and may include but are not limited to: The construction, demolition or rehabilitation of dams and weirs. Construction or modification of dikes, levees, floodwalls, seawalls, groins, jetties, breakwaters and stabilized sand dunes. Large-scale channelization of a waterway. • Other: There are additional types of flood mitigation projects that do not fall under the categories listed on this section. Please describe the proposed mitigation project. Are you proposing a Phased or Non -Phased flood control project? Please check the type of project that applies to your application. • Phased Proiect: Allow for development of a Hydrology and Hydraulic (H&H) study to ensure feasibility and effectiveness. Phased projects may include but are not limited to surveying, engineering, design, plans preparation, permitting and bidding for the proposed project, for Phase II approval. No construction activities for this project have been approved. • Non -Phased: Non -phased projects must be fully designed and compliant with EHP requirements. Does the proposed project include land purchasing? Please specify if your project includes the purchasing of any Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency MITIGATION Flood Control - Drainage Improvement Worksheet property/land necessary to complete the project (e.g., purchasing of a lot to build a new pond) and provide a brief explanation. Section IV - Historical Damage Information 1. ROADWAY/BRIDGES LOSS OF FUNCTION: Road/Bridge Location: Please enter the address of the road/bridge that will benefit from this project. Storm Name: Enter the name given to the natural hazard event when damage occurred. Date of Flood Event: Enter the date of the historical flood event. Estimated One -Way Traffic Trips per Day: Enter the total number of one-way daily trips. Daily one-way traffic trips can be estimated by roadside counters and tolls, or by estimates from State, county, parish, borough, township, or other local departments of transportation or public works agencies, or highway engineers. Estimates of daily one-way traffic trips can be obtained in writing from the relevant entity or person competent to determine the traffic count. The estimates should be dated and signed, be provided on the letterhead of the estimating official, and include the assumptions used in determining the estimated number of trips. Additional Reroute Time to Avoid Flooded Area (hrs./days): Enter the estimated time, in hours or days, for taking a reroute to avoid the flooded area. Documentation sources could be online mapping services or from estimates from State, county, parish, borough, township, or other local departments of transportation or public works agencies, or highway engineers. For road or bridge losses that do not have an available detour, the number of daily trips is still based on the number of one-way trips, but the Additional Time per One -Way Trip should be 12 hours Documentation should show clearly that not detour is available. Number of Additional Miles for Reroute: Enter the number of additional miles when taking a reroute. Additional miles may be obtained using online mapping services, scaling the distance on a highway map, or by driving the detour route and using the vehicle odometer. Speed limit data can be obtained by a field visit. Both distance and speed limit data can be provided in writing from county, parish, borough, township, or other local departments of transportation and public works agencies, or highway engineers. The estimate should be dated and signed and be provided on the letterhead of the estimating official. Road/Bridge Closure Duration (hrs./days): If the bridge/roadway has experienced closures in the past due to flooding events, enter the time, in hours or days, the roadway/bridge was closed. 2. BUILDING DAMAGES Property Location: Enter the location of the residential or non-residential building for the associated damages being provided. Storm Name: Enter the name given to the natural hazard event when damage occurred. Date of Flood Event: Enter the date of historical flood event. Flood Depth Above Finish Floor (feet): Provide an estimate of the flood depth above the Finish Floor. This information can be obtained from claims, damage assessment, high water marks, photos, etc. Documented Losses ($): Enter the estimated cost, in dollars, of the losses documented for the property due to the flooding event. The losses can include physical damages to the structure, content damages and/or the displacement cost experienced by the residents. Damage costs may be documented with Insurance claims, receipts from repair of flood damages, FEMA Public Assistance Worksheets, photos, property owner affidavit or other relevant source. If people trapped, how long (hrs.)? Provide the duration, in hours, the residents were trapped due to the flooding event. 3. AVOIDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COSTS Emergency Location: Provide the location (address) where the emergency management costs were incurred. Date of Event: Enter the date of historical flood event. Emergency Expense Description: Describe any additional expenses incurred by the City or County while attending the emergency during the historic damage event. Documented expenses may include but are not limited to renting portable generators, chillers, sewage truck rental to clean up spills, overtime paid to personnel to attend the emergency, etc. Expense Cost ($): Enter the total cost of the additional expenses incurred by the County or City. 4. LOSS OF CRITICAL FUNCTION: A flood control project is expected to reduce floods risks to several facilities, including buildings, roads, and utilities. The following sub- sections provide guidance to better identify the benefits (avoided losses) that are expected with the implementation of the proposed project. 4.1. FIRE STATION Property Location: Provide the location of the critical facility for the associated damages being provided. How many people are served by the Fire Station? Enter the number of people served by the fire station. If only one fire station serves the entire population of a community, that number may be used. For larger communities with multiple fire stations, only the population directly served by the station being mitigated can be used. Documentation for the service population can come from the fire station, local planning office, or other creditable source. Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency MITIGATION Flood Control - Drainage Improvement Worksheet Does the fire station provide Emergency Medical Services (EMS)? Select "Yes" if the fire station provides EMS or has EMS trained personnel; Otherwise, select "No" Provide the address of the nearest fire station: The nearest fire station would serve as an altemative station to provide fire protection due to loss of function of the fire station being mitigated. Provide the address of the nearest fire station with EMS: The nearest fire station would serve as an alternative station to provide EMS and fire protection due to loss of function of the fire station being mitigated. (If the nearest fire station also provides EMS, please provide same address). Loss of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days): Enter the duration, in hours or days, the critical facility was not able to provide service/function in the past, due to flooding events. 4.2. POLICE STATION How many people are served by this police station? Enter the number of people served by the police station. If only one police station serves the entire population of a community, that number may be used. For larger communities with multiple police stations, only the population directly served by the station being mitigated can be used. Documentation for the service population can come from the police station, local planning office, or other creditable source. How many police officers work or report to this police station? Enter the number of sworn officers that work or report at this location. How many police officers have a designated office space at this police station? Enter the number of police officers that have a designated office space at this police station. It is assumed that police officers with a designated office space would be restricted to perform their regular duties if the police station were shut down due to a disaster. This information is necessary to estimate the loss of function due to the increased crime caused by a reduction of police officers in service. Loss of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days): Enter the duration, in hours or days, the critical facility was not able to provide service/function in the past, due to flooding events. 4.3. HOSPITAL How many people are being served by this hospital? Enter the number of people being served by this hospital. Only the population directly served by the hospital being mitigated can be used. Documentation for the service population can come from the hospital, local planning office, or other creditable source. Provide the address of the nearest hospital capable of providing the same type of service: Identify the nearest hospital capable of providing similar services as the hospital being mitigated. How many people are being served by the nearest hospital capable of providing the same type of service? Enter the number of people served by the nearest hospital capable of providing the same service. Only the population directly served by the alternative hospital can be used. Documentation for the service population can come from the alternative hospital, local planning office, or other creditable source. Loss of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days): Enter the duration, in hours or days, the critical facility was not able to provide service/function in the past, due to flooding events. 4.4. UTILITY Type of utility: From the dropdown menu options, select the type of utility(es) that will be mitigated by the proposed project. • Electrical Power: Potential structures include but are not limited to power generation facilities, transmission (e.g., overhead, and underground transmission), distribution (e.g., overhead, and underground distribution). • Potable Water: Potential structures include but are not limited to source structures, potable water treatment facilities, water storage structures, pumping stations, piping and appurtenances. • Wastewater: Potential structures include but are not limited to gravity sewers, pumping stations, force mains, wastewater treatment facilities. • IT Services / Communications: Potential structures include but are not limited to emergency communication towers, telecommunications, etc. • Other: Describe type of utility to be mitigated. Documentation is required that shows the economic value of the service in terms of dollars per person per day. In these cases, the value of the service is typically determined by the utility company. Number of customers directly served by utility system: Enter the number of the customers (people) directly connected to the location(s) that will be mitigated. The number of customers affected by the loss of service can be obtained from the entity, agency, or company providing the utility service. The documentation should be in the form of a letter from the utility on their letterhead. For multiple locations, specify the number of customers connected to each specific location. Loss of Service/Function Duration (hrs./days): Enter the duration, in hours or days, the critical facility was not able to provide service/function in the past, due to flooding events. 4.5. OTHER Specify Facility Name: Enter the name of the critical facility that will be mitigated. Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency MITIGATION Flood Control - Drainage Improvement Worksheet What is the Annual Operational Budget for this critical facility? Enter the annual budget for the critical facility that is being mitigated. Documentation should include the annual budget for the building that is being mitigated. If the building houses multiple local agencies, the cumulative budget should be used. Altemately, if the annual budget is for an entire school district and one of the buildings is being mitigated, documentation should include how the annual budget was calculated for the single school building. Section V - Professional Expected Damage Information The industry standard analysis of professional expected damages is for a minimum of three (3) flood event scenarios to be modeled and presented. The modeled events must be different recurrences and are project specific, based on the H&H report and the level of protection the project will accomplish. Generally, more modeled scenarios lead to a more thorough understanding of the project and often more benefits that can be applied. Professional Expected Damages BEFORE Mitigation: Before mitigation damages are based on existing conditions at the site. To demonstrate the flood risk, expected damages for certain severity events must be modeled (e.g., 10 -year flood, 50 - year flood. 100 -year flood, etc.) • Recurrence Interval: The recurrence interval (RI) is the frequency of event which is expected to cause flood damages at the project location. • Estimated Structural Damage ($): Dollar value of the estimated structural damages (i.e., the cost to repair or replace the damaged property such as foundation, walls, roof, etc.) expected, using results from the H&H BEFORE mitigation model. Damages estimates can be obtained using industry accepted depth damage functions (DDFs) or other reliable source. • Estimated Content Damage ($): Dollar value of the estimated content damages (i.e., the cost to repair or replace the damaged property such as flooring, HVAC, plumbing, etc.) expected, using results from the BEFORE mitigation H&H model. Damages estimates can be obtained using industry accepted depth damage functions (DDFs) or other reliable source. • Displacement Cost ($): Displacement costs occur when occupants (of residential, commercial, or public buildings) are displaced to temporary quarters while damage is repaired. These costs include rent and other monthly costs, such as furniture rental and utilities, and one-time costs, such as moving and utility hook-up fees. They can also include loss of business income for commercial buildings. • Road Closures (hrs.): If a bridge/roadway is expected to experienced closures in as a result of the BEFORE mitigation H&H model results, enter the time, in hours or days, the roadway/bridge is expected to be closed to unsafe conditions (i.e., floodwaters above road > 6"). Professional Expected Damages AFTER Mitigation: The same scenario flood events as before mitigation should result in reduced damages due to the mitigation project being implemented. The after -mitigation damages should be estimated based on the level of protection provided by the project. For example, for a flood wall that protects 10 structures during the 100 -year flood event, it could be assumed that there would no longer be damages to the structures below the 100 - year level of protection but there may be some minor damages due to overtopping in a 500 -year event. • Recurrence Interval: The recurrence interval (RI) is the frequency of event which is expected to cause flood damages at the project location. This recurrence intervals should match those used for the BEFORE mitigation estimates. • Estimated Structural Damage ($): Dollar value of the estimated structural damages (i.e., the cost to repair or replace the damaged property such as foundation, walls, roof, etc.) expected, using results from the H&H AFTER mitigation model. Damages estimates can be obtained using industry accepted depth damage functions (DDFs) or other reliable source. • Estimated Content Damage ($): Dollar value of the estimated content damages (i.e., the cost to repair or replace the damaged property such as flooring, HVAC, plumbing, etc.) expected, using results from the AFTER -mitigation H&H model. Damages estimates can be obtained using industry accepted depth damage functions (DDFs) or other reliable source. • Displacement Cost ($): Displacement costs occur when occupants (of residential, commercial, or public buildings) are displaced to temporary quarters while damage is repaired. These costs include rent and other monthly costs, such as furniture rental and utilities, and one-time costs, such as moving and utility hook-up fees. They can also include loss of business income for commercial buildings. • Road Closures (hrs.): If a bridge/roadway is expected to experienced closures in as a result of the AFTER mitigation H&H model results, enter the time, in hours or days, the roadway/bridge is expected to be closed to unsafe conditions (i.e., floodwaters above road > 6"). Bureau of Mitigation Florida Division of Emergency 9 CITY OF OPA LOCKA FLORIDA Pembroke Pines - Peu:�al �ai'r L 9 9 mire Courmy Club rail_Oh LAP'S .J Hollywood 9 Hallalaata �ss� Beach Project Site Location h 'weal Lillie River Gladeare.v Norm Miami alien snores El Portal NCINi Bay •Hllaga tzti Bel Harbour sorforae MOM 80000 Project Location Map mtsr i8 II ;4'56 y. City of Opa-Iocka Cairo Lane / NW 127th St. Roadway Improvement Project 11111.ItIilllilil\ Ilfllll ��Il.,ildu,1111111�IIlIIhIIIIICIIIIVI m it,. _ ! NW 127th Street and -Alexandria Drive facing East. CITY OF OPA LOCKA FLORIDA City of Opa-locka Cairo Lane Project These three pictures depict the result of a regular rainy day in the areas of Cairo Lane This picture demonstrates the amount of sediment and contamination from the area businesses that flow into an already contaminated canal which flows into the Biscayne Bay. Y-�_ ' I' ' _1 11 x\'111 \\ J L NW 17th Path any. `: ne1 MN •;. n\, `\\ \�. A. t 1\\ °a\\.\\ -NW 79th'Ave = ° �iP \\ -..\ -- :.-- . NW 20th-.) i 9 I I r° )\• \,.env4luiMN?, \\' if -Ave :I > ii .•..:6,1,:' •• \• \�. \�Nw zlat-C4-\' �I , 0 .I �. 5_;S t2A • \'.,• .. '\_• ,\....\,, NW -22nd A., \\ \\__L_ _ nom :1 :3°Pm MNI \ �1\ ;' '1 =1 f NW22nd PI s I,1 11 I it .� \•,\ v\ ° • _ OF `- I NW 23`rd'Ave I 1° i zi ii 11 ,x, \;\ \\ ? - I 11 Li; Iii iY I I z 1 { ',i I t `\ •,,\ \ W 24th Ava 1I g $4. "1__=Y NW.24th Ava f t 11 l I I �---NW24t ct \ \ 1• 2 i 41 I — 'NW24thct\ t ,i. 11i I i 14 � 1.t ; •NW 26th'Ave.;\ \� , i-NW24 Ave"=..5 1 i ` 1 1 I ++ . NW 25th-Ct-._ N- jenV419LMN776 \ `• II I a -] I • _ I. I .�:, - NW.27th Ave -_ 1- - _,1 --Frontaga'Rtl� �'� •, r- -� �f ,^ � . ‘ LI � �.— p L 1 Z 1.1 i I, Ili1 II II i .d - \\z i P�k3v) .. 1 II az. 14 11 I Ij J,• \•, ° \�� =°r / n(/ I•�.;:Nz8thAva;=1b!1]Ii 1 i Ii ,I.� ti l "\ \\, '\\ �,P..` � , I s� 11ALANDAnst w \\ \ '';",'S ° 11 1 1`'l i 1 li LI t .,1 1 I' 3 1 m \\ \\ �. . ; f l y 1 !j' : I L' 1i ,<Q,• 64a 11 II • \'0-,--:-•-k, s- i 1oh 11 1 1 ii --- Y , t 1 'I I f ,a_ , I -..e.:--- . (\\ \:, P90 �d� }Pae , . W .4,BA°'r-. -- — -NW 3Mh'Av, -_ —..l f" ..1 1 _jANIM st.:'� I x •\.. •\\ e�\ \'s��°90I 11 ems,, p 1; { 1 it' -'"1 O. 1 I II 4 1 L1 3• 1 w. s� �\ \''• • "-,\ `• i <1 11 r; 11 '> °' i I NW ..st L=- -� �:�Y I �, \ . VIZ:_ _ 1""" a 1 4 '. I . I ,� �-\ '.PER I v 1t J. N A Ava r f aty 1 a.. co°AOA° St I `f� \' :%•.:. �,a• A�: z. I w,js � [ 11 1 �d �•, :<, cue j \ � '— I <I « 3 a 1: t L..I j \ .-,• i; y gtNeA . .: \\. ° \;•\ •\ i II 1 1 I, M = -�``. L .I h ..---Pi I )1.�� Il P�o,�- .; •�. \ Aus°n+f-r :-3-NW32nd:Ave,.-'*1 • 1 •I \ \ , 1 ` .1 •51 �\ Mp.N \. s 4-\ r v;Y I I 111 P°RT-_'. :--1°Peb£MN "1'r— i' I I1 Gi •`\ v......2.--11:4- � (" \\ o'N \ \ d' � I I 1• I . z --sa° e° - I I a \ ') )• P`39 .. m\ 1 1.1 i i I • a\`og` ' / rl \\\ SESAME St' II �e \ �� P4a. /3 \ '�.: 1 , I ALEXANDRIA 34th"Ave ,6:...-.--, 11 �'a \\\)Q � � +° fi III \oJ ; \\, I jALEXAM • x .. �r°P3:r �:tIeavNna:-- \' !1,! I 1 I -- i z 5- \ '\:' I I_ 11 I - 1 L- IL -aaL- /e —ear 4u£IMN _: \ L ._::.—euel.al■° . — 1. 1f-- ----- -- -a�d44L£ MN_.. -'-�l 11 t: 11 J I e_ 1111 n I �9V a"r4aae xN �` I -- �� Ii 1, II 1 — _ --/ � t.- - c Irk 1 i i .-_..._ --_ �. re \: Ii 1 = .11 �! il ij i Ill c %: iI 1,I a/` 1 �, a 1 11 .1 .1 t 1 II ,; IIi 1 141 ;T.1i ii , A • 1 "111 711 :;Li co - U 0 J I 1, L:= ...:j env:4194:MN1 ... -- ;� : ; t MN J. . / 11 = y:/ ,.- ---:, -anv of NINA- 1 i 11 x;4181 MN':.. I \I, \:W n\ \\ \\ \\, 1. , '• ' 1 1 I \. % \� \\ ) :I I % 9'r, \\ `\\ --1—, == NW°19th Ave; =i I' •\\ •• \•�,1-=_=.._.; Nw2ah..i; 9 k I.�S )•. \`.ntl4102MN . \ f -Ave it > i1 . y\ �, I • `�\ `\'�\Ord'+��dO = �.\ •r I \1 v : 14=7,111 '•\. 6V\ � _ I" L. NW 22nd Ft 1 § CI ( I I! � -\ E-. -1 r NW 23rd'? I 11. • I � I �� ;n� \'�.\,•• ,\``,.A7-11---------1 I li � I fPil II II � I .I 11 j ' \'•, \''\%. i, ttiA»-.11 N § 1: -Ave. 1 i i 1! 1 1' \ Imo---- --114 ; Y I t1 I t NW 24thct `. 't ' 'y1 o u I!; N :INW 25th-Aves,\ Q tn ! f :j Ij:i 5 ��;` aA tl419. zM`=�� `\ — — JI a NW 27th.Ave.. ._— — — ---Frontage Rd-"-' �I I1 161 i t �`y"� j)?I II N \ I l 11 I:I f 11 '-_ a"d N_ 4;94. M ::\:i // II .i CITY OF OPA LOCKA FLORIDA U.S. DEPARTMENT U.S. GEOLOGICAL GO INTERIOR AL SURVEY vre�i.J�Joy+u�J 10 6 66 67 66 t 20 { 61 Es.m 65 64 65 6) -T916 R400 J$USTopo COUNTRY -1:14 MIAMI'LAKES SCALE 1:04 000 1 ', OPA-LOCKA QUADRANGLE FLORIDA 7.5-AUROIE SERIES T510 R41E ( ^ -1 406641651,1461146 4n4•44sE 644444446, 4fut 0+,4 �.w,..,..�.. D J 35 74 71 )1 64 OPA-LOCKA, FL 3031