Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutVPC 04/04/22 Meeting Packet Town of Brewster Vision Planning Committee 2198 Main St., Brewster, MA 02631 brewplan@brewster-ma.gov (508) 896-3701 MEETING AGENDA Remote Participation Only Monday, April 4, 2022 at 3:30 PM This meeting will be conducted by remote participation pursuant to Governor Baker’s March 2020 orders suspending certain Open Meeting Law provisions and imposing limits on public gatherings. No in-person meeting attendance will be permitted. If the Town is unable to live broadcast this meeting, a record of the proceedings will be provided on the Town website as soon as possible. The meeting may be viewed by: Live broadcast (Brewster Government TV Channel 18), Livestream (livestream.brewster- ma.gov), or Video recording (tv.brewster-ma.gov). Meetings may be joined by: 1. Phone: Call (929) 436-2866 or (301) 715-8592. Zoom Meeting ID: 819 3038 8203 and Passcode 317154 To request to speak: Press *9 and wait to be recognized. 2. Zoom Webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81930388203?pwd=VHEvUURMM1ZFdUJNREJIbEN3SFdOZz09 and enter Passcode 317154 To request to speak: Tap Zoom “Raise Hand” button or type “Chat” comment with your name and address, then wait to be recognized. Vision Planning Committee Hal Minis Chair Sharon Tennstedt Vice Chair Amanda Bebrin Andi Genser Patricia Hess Suzanne Kenney Fran Schofield Paul Wallace Administrative Assistant Ellen Murphy Select Board Liaison Kari Hoffmann Finance Committee Liaison Honey Pivirotto 1. Call to Order 2. Declaration of a Quorum 3. Meeting Participation Statement 4. Review and Approval of March 21, 2022 Minutes 5. Updates on public engagement activities a) Discussion of survey results 6. Status of summary papers 7. Action planning teams and schedule a) Local Economy b) Housing c) Water Resources d) Open Space 8. Communication – review current and future actions 9. Update of LCP roadmap 10. Status report on Tighe and Bond tasks 11. Items for the next meeting agenda 12. Review Action Items from March 21st meeting 13. Next Meeting: Tuesday, April 19th 14. Matters Not Reasonably Anticipated by the Chair 15. Adjournment Date Posted: Date Revised: Received by Town Clerk: 3/31/2022 Page 1 of 2 TOWN OF BREWSTER VISION PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, March 21, 2022, at 3:30PM Virtual Meeting Hal Minis, Chair, convened the Brewster Vision Planning Committee via remote participation with members: Sharon Tennstedt, Amanda Bebrin, Suzanne Kenney, Fran Schofield, Paul Wallace, and Patricia Hess were present. Andi Gesner was absent. A quorum was determined. Also present: Jill Scalise, Kari Hoffmann, Honey Pivirotto, Sharon Rooney and Ellen Murphy. The Chair read the Recording or Taping Notification: This meeting will be conducted by remote participation pursuant to Governor Baker’s March 2020 orders suspending certain Open Meeting Law provisions and imposing limits on public gatherings. No in-person meeting attendance will be permitted. If the Town is unable to live broadcast this meeting, a record of the proceedings will be provided on the Town website as soon as possible. The Town has established specific email addresses for each board and committee so the public can submit comments either before or during the meeting. To submit public comment or questions to the Vision Planning Committee, please email: brewplan@brewster-ma.gov. Review and Approval of March 7th meeting minutes: Suzanne made a motion to approve the March 7th meeting minutes, Amanda seconded the motion, a roll call was taken, and the March 7th meeting minutes were approved unanimously. Brewster Housing Production Plan Update: Jill Scalise Brewster Housing Coordinator provided an update on the Housing Production Plan. Jill informed the Committee that the current approved housing plan, which expires in June is part of the Town’s Local Comprehensive Plan and the process coordinates with the Vision Plan. She indicated that accomplishments such as hiring a Housing Coordinator, creating Municipal Affordable Housing Trust and amending the accessory dwelling bylaw were all strategies originally outlined in the existing Housing Production plan. The plan update will include a needs assessment, goals and implementation strategies, which will be funded by the Community Preservation Act grant. The goal is to have the plan complete by the end of June. The Select Board and the Planning Board are the entities that formally adopt the Housing Production plan. Jill provided the Committee with a brief overview of the schedule and indicated that the update will include data collection, interviews and a housing survey. The 2020 census just released will be incorporated into the housing needs summary. Jill informed the Committee that there is a housing needs survey which will be available until the end of March. Jill encouraged everyone to take the survey. A draft of the needs assessment will be available in April and the Housing Partnership will hold a virtual meeting on Thursday, April 28 to present the findings of the needs assessment as well as provide opportunities for the community to share feedback related to housing needs and potential housing goals and strategies. Jill will share the materials with the Vision Planning Committee. A draft of the Housing Production plan will be shared with the Select Board and Planning Board allowing for feedback and comments. Final adoption by the Select Board and Planning Board will be at a meeting in June. Hal asked if a draft report will be available in May for the Vision Planning Committee. Jill will coordinate a small group meeting with the Housing Building Block team and the Housing consultants. Jill discussed the changes over the past 5 years since that last Housing Production plan was adopted highlighting the dramatic increase in cost of housing, reduction in rental properties and a wider range of income looking for housing. Suzanne asked for a definition of affordable housing. Jill ensured the Committee that the Housing Production plan will address affordable housing and the multiple definitions. Hal suggested the Vision Planning Committee share their results on housing data. Updates of public engagement activities: a)Discussion of survey results: The Committee discussed the survey data focusing on the town center question. 44% of the survey participants thought the town center should be in the Foster Square area. Hal indicated that the comments support several other areas that could be considered as the town center. Fran observed the Foster Square Page 2 of 2 area is the most concentrated area of activities on 6A and it is near the geographic center of town. Hal commented on the survey participants that were opposed to a town center. Sharon also commented on the traffic concern in the area. Suzanne noted that many of the comments were across several of the Building Blocks. Hal pointed out survey participants do not want parking lots but walkable areas. Sharon highlighted themes across the building blocks from the comments provided. She indicated that the comments are very resourceful, and the Building Block teams should pay close attention when analyzing the data. The Committee decided to digest the data and meet with their teams. Sharon indicated there were several comments for all of the Building Blocks. Paul asked for the data in a bar graph format. Sharon will provide before the next meeting. It was decided that the Building Block teams will meet and review the data and then discuss with the Committee. Water Resources, Housing, Local Economy and Open Space will be discussed at the next meeting, the following meeting the focus will be on Climate Mitigation, Coastal Management, Community Infrastructure and Governance. Paul Wallace will join Local Economy and Housing. Hal asked the Committee how the results should be shared with the community. Hal suggested the Committee review and provide a draft of the results. It was also suggested to provide an update to the Select Board. Patricia discussed what was done for the previous survey. She suggested an overview for the general public, and will send what was done for the previous survey. Amanda suggested the Committee be mindful of the message. Kari suggested an executive summary. Status of Summary Papers: The first drafts have been sent out to the Committee. Hal met with Town Administration and is currently waiting on the approach for town staff review. Tighe and Bond is working on the Land Use and existing conditions paper. Fran sent her comments on Climate Mitigation and Coastal Management. Hal suggested once all comments are submitted a final draft will be done. Action Planning teams and schedule Over the next two meetings, as discussed earlier, the Committee will review the 8 Building Blocks. After the meetings the Committee will look at the mapping work that Tighe and Bond has done. This will be the base for action planning teams to draft the priority actions. The timeframe is late April. Sharon Rooney confirmed her team is ready whenever the Committee would like to review the mapping. Hal is hoping to meet in person for this exercise. Communication – review current and future actions: Fran provided an update to the announcement of the survey results which was included in the meeting packet. Hal encouraged everyone to send to the various groups to get the word out. Ellen will send to Town Administration for the website and to the Committee. Other communications discussed were a general overview of the survey results, and a presentation to the Select Board. Update on LCP roadmap and status report on Tighe and Bond tasks: Sharon Rooney stated they were on track for the revised roadmap and the summary papers. Hal will share the Housing summary paper acknowledging the plan will be updated. Sharon Rooney will send a copy to Ellen for distribution. Kari asked if the timeline for the LCP is still on track for the Fall Town Meeting. Hal suggested it may be pushed out to Spring 2023 Town Meeting. Discussion on in-person, hybrid or virtual meeting: The Committee discussed opening up the meetings to in-person. It was decided to do a hybrid approach. Review Action Items from March 7th meeting: Patricia informed the Committee that there were no other outstanding action items. Next Meeting: Monday, April 4th. Matters Not Reasonably Anticipated by the Chair: none Fran made a motion to adjourn the meeting, Sharon second the motion, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 5:05 pm. Powered by BREWSTER'S NEXT STEPS Powered by What is your age group? Answered: 2,301 Skipped: 11 Powered by Are you a .... Answered: 2,293 Skipped: 19 Powered by How long have you lived in Brewster? Answered: 2,299 Skipped: 13 Powered by Do you.... Answered: 2,296 Skipped: 16 Powered by Are you a Brewster business owner or operator? Answered: 2,291 Skipped: 21 Powered by What areas do you think should be part of a Town Center or Centers? Answered: 2,048 Skipped: 264 Powered by How much do you agree with including each of the following features or uses in a Town Center(s)? Answered: 2,020 Skipped: 292 Powered by How much do you agree with including each of the following in a Town Center(s)? Answered: 2,020 Skipped: 292 Powered by In developing a Town Center(s), how important are each of the following controls for preserving the character of Rt 6A? Answered: 2,011 Skipped: 301 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following actions to achieve the Water Resources Goal. Answered: 2,041 Skipped: 271 Powered by How willing are you to do the following to help protect water quality? Answered: 2,038 Skipped: 274 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following actions to achieve the Open Space Goal. Answered: 2,025 Skipped: 287 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following actions or zoning changes to achieve the Housing Goal. Answered: 2,010 Skipped: 302 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following actions to achieve the Coastal Management Goal. Answered: 2,001 Skipped: 311 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following actions to achieve the Local Economy Goal. Answered: 1,987 Skipped: 325 Powered by Would you like to see the business areas along Rt 6A at the Orleans town line expand or stay the same? Answered: 1,877 Skipped: 435 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following actions to achieve the Community Infrastructure Goal. Answered: 1,986 Skipped: 326 Powered by Please tell us how much you agree with each of the following to achieve the Climate Mitigation Goal. Answered: 1,975 Skipped: 337 BREWSTER’S NEXT STEPS SURVEY RESULTS OF FOCUSED CONVERSATIONS RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS AGE n 15-25 1 26-40 5 YEARS OF RESIDENCE n 1-5 3 6-10 0 11-20 1 More than 20 2 RESIDENCE n Full-time 6 OWNERSHIP n Own Home 4 Rent Home 2 BUILDING BLOCK 1: TOWN CHARACTER WHAT DOES A TOWN CENTER LOOK LIKE?  My idea of a town center in Brewster looks like a more densely-developed area around an existing space in town (i.e. around foster square). This would include a greater density of housing, mixed-use retail space, alternative types of housing (not just single-family homes), and a wider array of businesses. Better bikes/sidewalks would be great, but I don’t see much utility in developing these immediately along 6A, as folks don’t generally walk along 6A in Brewster and it is dangerous.  Whatever fits with the historic character of 6a. yes sidewalks  We shouldn't restrict usage or appearance (colors, mailboxes are silly to regulate). 6a already has sidewalks, which is great. The charm of Brewster is that it isn't a visual clone of Chatham (for example). It's okay for things to be quirky/unique looking -- we aren't locked into an aesthetic, we have more personality (that we can show through home/building/business appearance)  Mixed use with lots of housing  Just what we have but keep up sidewalks  All of the above - keep the character of town but help small businesses COMMENTS  Pick up/send mail Buy a TV (or other appliance) Do my taxes Buy groceries Sit on a bench in an open area (not necessarily a park) and drink a coffee Watch people coming and going from their apartments/condos/houses Park my car Go to a doctors appointment Have a nice dinner Ride my bike.  Usage: commercial, like the Sparrow area in Orleans. Pop up commercial: artists, food trucks, between full businesses -- still (taxable) commerce! Should not include big commercial uses -- not another Cumby's  Town center is NOT Underpass Rd (the post office is the only relevant service in that area). We should encourage and make it easy for people to use a town center -- including businesses that want to exist. Dennis Village around Old Bass River Road is a good inspiration/example in terms of walkability and moderate density. Market, restaurants, gas station, shopping, and it's walkable. Some elements of Dennisport share some of these elements, too.  Should include restaurants, cafes, small shops, housing above shops, and services (post office, library, schools)  More business support to create more jobs Location of Town Center(s) n Around Lemon Tree Village 1 Along 6A from Rt 124 to Ellis Landing Rd 1 Underpass Rd 1 6A from Underpass Rd to Ocean Edge 1 Area around Foster Square, Brewster Bookstore and Snowy Owl 3 All of the above 1 No Town Center 0 Other (“From Fire House to Cumby’s”) 1 BUILDING BLOCK 2: WATER RESOURCES WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  I feel that preserving Brewster’s drinking water, as well as other water resources is extremely important. No one wants to move to/live in a town with poor water quality. Also, part of the attraction of Brewster/Cape Cod in general, are our natural water resources. However, a middle-ground needs to be struck between preserving water quality and sustaining healthy, and necessary, housing production.  Conservation is important across the board -- anything polluting the wetlands/water is an issue  If it isn't a top town priority, our water will be irrevocably damaged. It's already being damaged so it needs to be a priority to fix!  We have impaired ponds that need remediation, both for our economy and our quality of lif e  It is important to all our health and the health of the land COMMENTS  The Town should be amenable to IA septic systems to reduce nitrogen load (especially in zone 2 ar ea)  I want my kids to have a safe place to live and although I grew up here, I have to leave because there are no jobs. I hope I can return one day. BUILDING BLOCK 3: OPEN SPACE WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  I feel preserving open space is pretty important, however the Town already has a considerable amount of undeveloped/preserved land (Punkhorn, various beaches, parks, etc.). I think we can spare some land for the needs of housing/business development.  Conservation is important for the character of the town -- let's not add a second Ocean Edge  It was a miss to put in a dog park in a wooded area that had to be clear cut. Open space is important, especially in light of the Sea Camps purchase -- but the field at the bay parcel is a waste. That space should be re-wilded or reforested immediately. The goal should not be to have it remain a large, fertilized, irrigated lawn .  Brewster is known for its conservation of land and protection of wildlife and that's what I like about our town  I'm very excited we bought the Sea Camps and we are preserving the land COMMENTS  Town could work with coop extension (may already do) in order to encourage people to reduce their lawns, which would increase the feel of open space around town Importance of Goal Mean= 3.8 SD=0.37 Importance of Goal Mean= 3.3 SD=0.75 BUILDING BLOCK 4: HOUSING HOUSING CONCERNS FOR PEOPLE IN YOUR AGE GROUP  As for people in my age group, the price to purchase a unit of housing in Brewster is simply out of reach for most .  No one can afford to live here regardless of how much money they mak e  Yes - not enough available year-round rentals. The lack of this market is a bigger issue than homes for sale. Homeownership is important but it's not for everyone. The nature of the CC economy is predicated on a lot of people who aren't good candidates for mortgages/underwriting  yes - people with children aren't able to afford homes of their own  I live above my parents’ garage and I'm in my 30's. We need more affordable housing and rental opportunities  There is not enough rental housing and it's too expensive. WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  Fostering the development of affordable, stable housing for Brewster is critical to ensuring the longevity of our town. I don’t think this requires any qualifying arguments .  We have an ongoing housing crisis. We should be de-incentivizing short term rentals and using the money to fund affordable housing. Short term rentals/investment properties are being bought by people who don't live here, aren't using the homes, and aren't part of the community -- and they're taking the money out of the community instead of using it to help solve the problems they're causing  COVID amplified our existing housing crisis -- there are regularly 0 homes for sale in town under a million dollars  Not enough housing that I can afford  I have to leave the Cape because of the lack of jobs and housing we can afford  We have a horrible housing crisis! ADU's need to be super easy to build/install. Current zoning should change to support that, as well as changing occupancy restrictions (especially when paired with IA septic systems). These changes would allow us to make better use of existing and potential spaces for units. TYPE OF HOUSING THAT WOULD BE BEST FOR PEOPLE WANTING TO LIVE AND WORK IN BREWSTER  I would like to see higher density, development other than single-family houses. As for affordable and subsidized housing developments, my preference is for smaller developments although I know this creates challenges for larger developers who try to capitalize on economies of scale when developing propert y  Higher density is a good idea but will probably be hard to sell to the community. Yes, housing near transit. Cottage communities would better fit the character.  Yes, higher density. Yes, multiple units in larger homes. Yes, housing near transit. Conditional ye s on small houses: concern about density, like in Dennisport, which is an inappropriate use of SF homes (would make more sense to build multi-unit homes/buildings) -- unless we also change the occupancy restrictions for existing footprints of homes  Higher density housing; multiple units in larger houses; small houses; housing near public transportation and businesses (2) COMMENTS  For the kids who grow up here, they leave for college and then can't come back here because there's no year round housing, especially when compared to opportunities in larger cities. /// in new developments (not 40B), Town should require them to not exclusively be 4 bed, 3 bath, $1mill, market-rate homes. Every new development should include multi-unit structures, townhomes, etc at a range of costs.  We also need housing for our seasonal workforce and seniors Importance of Goal Mean= 4.0 SD=0.00 BUILDING BLOCK 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  I feel that coastal management/proper stewardship is important, however this should not eclipse more of the important needs in Brewster (i.e. housing) particularly if we are looking at coastal management from an economic standpoint (for example – lets build more parking lots on beaches so we can have more people spend money on our beaches). Not interested.  If we don't deal with this now, it only gets worse and more expensive. Retreat should be the goal. To support that, the town should not allow bay-front owners variances for seawalls, etc. It's also shortsighted to ignore the bay when talking about levels of nitrogen/nitrates - just because it isn't an enclosed abayement, doesn't mean it isn't impacted. We should be proactive about that water quality before we inevitably have to measure/remediate  Our seashore is what makes Brewster special!  We need to do our part for the next generation.  Because it’s a reason to live here. COMMENTS  Allow IA septic systems throughout town, and see the bay as part of the nitrogen problem, even if it isn't currently a legal requirement (though it very well may be in the future) -- we know where the water goes!  I think we sell too many beach passes to visitors and we overwhelm the areas. This also makes it difficult for residents to use the beach. BUILDING BLOCK 6: LOCAL ECONOMY WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  I would really love to see an expansion of our business sector in Brewster. Let’s face it – it is unreasonable to expect that Google will open a data center here, but some other ‘chain stores’ might do well here, and, with careful oversight, their developments may not be detrimental to our existing businesses or the ‘natural’ look of our landscape. Driving to Hyannis is a pain.  Key to all these community goals is having sustainable employment and having a business -friendly environment.  If we don't have a strong local economy, we don't have anything. Need jobs for people and places for them to live!  The town has a reputation as being business unfriendly, which doesn't do us any favors. That is a trend that is changing now, which is good!  I am a teacher and I know young families are having a hard tim e making ends meet because of lack of economic opportunities.  We need more companies that provide jobs with a career ladder. COMMENTS  RE: above question -- would rather see us fill/occupy the spaces and buildings we already have that are sitting vacant. In general, the town should be amenable to businesses of many kinds Importance of Goal Mean= 3.3 SD=0.75 Importance of Goal Mean= 4.0 SD=0.00 BUILDING BLOCK 7: COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  We need ways to get around -- that's important for desirability and viability. We don't need much growth, but we do need focused development where we prioritize specific areas. Considerations by the town: adopting IA septic systems and tax credits for renting your home year-round.  I think we have to make 6a safer for walkers and bike riders and people waiting for the bus  It's important to have a community that connects with one another especially for young families trying to establish themselves and i support more forms of transportation COMMENTS  I think investments in transportation should be made on the Cape. However I don’t see this as Brewster’s responsibility. Fundamentally, anyone who lives/works on the Cape needs a car. Brewster is not a city. I t hink the Town should continue to make investments in green energy, however.  Sidewalks on Millstone! In areas as developed as Dennisport/Barnstable Village/Lemon Tree shops: add infill housing! Prioritize increasing density in 'center' areas and then cluster infrastructure around those areas. BUILDING BLOCK 8: CLIMATE MITIGATION WHY IS GOAL IMPORTANT?  I think continued investment in climate mitigation is important for Brewster, particularly solar panels, improvements to our waste disposal, recycling, and enforcement of landscaping policies (water bans in the summer) as well as things like banning ‘nips’ etc. However, I do not support the Town’s investment in electric charging stations. I get that this is good, but most people can’t afford electric vehicles, and most vehicles are still traditional gas-burning vehicles. Why should the town subsidize electr ic charging stations? So that people who move here and buy million dollar homes from the Upper East Side have a place to charge their Teslas? No thanks.  Very important -- it's a big concern, given where we live. We shouldn't be making it worse.  Not specific enough of a goal -- too broad. Yes, implement a solar bylaw to protect forested areas. Solar bylaw to panel historic homes should be by right and exempted from Historic commission (more important than aesthetics ). Business Area along 6A at Orleans line n Expand 4 Stay the same 2 Importance of Goal Mean= 2.8 SD=0.90 Importance of Goal Mean= 3.2 SD=0.69 COMMENTS  If it's cost-effective, the town should install solar panels on as many town buildings as possible (schools, town hall). Street lights should convert to rechargeable, solar powered LEDs (which have an easy ROI). In light of our current geopolitical turmoil, and with gas prices skyrocketing, it's more important than ever to divest ourselves of dependence on fossil fuels -- while also being cognizant of 'climate friendly alternatives' on the surface. Lithium batteries (for electric cars) are also hurtful of the environment, and who are we buying t hem from? Makes more sense long-term to invest in structural, large-scale changes.  This goal should be included in the other goals, instead of its own goal. Making Brewster’s Community Vision a Reality In 2017, the town of Brewster started a vision planning process with citizen participation. Guided by the Brewster Vision Advisory Group, a series of two community workshops were held in June and October, where participants defined the issues critical to the town’s future and identified actions going forward. Based on these issues and actions, a town-wide survey was undertaken in January 2018. A total of 1,275 people responded to the survey. Forty percent of the respondents were part-time residents, and thirty-eight percent of respondents have lived in Brewster over 20 years. According to survey respondents, the most important issue is how the town will ensure protection of water resources. This includes prioritizing parcels of land designated for water supply protection, preserving marine watersheds, implementing storm water management and expanding requirements for advanced wastewater treatment. In addition, respondents see the need to expand public education and outreach regarding threats to drinking water. In addition to the concern expressed by respondents to protect our water resources, respondents also highlighted the need to protect the town’s open space. They see the need to use zoning and other regulations as alternatives to land purchases in order to protect open space in environmentally sensitive areas. Respondents also want to make sure the character of Brewster does not significantly change. Reviewing, strengthening and enforcing zoning along Route 6A that ensures historic preservation and building standards is a priority. They also seek to better understand and define “appropriate development.” Respondents see a need for a town Coastal Resource Management Plan and a process to engage citizens before implementing specific actions. It is not surprising that high on the list are services for an “age friendly” community and ways to help seniors age in place, since nearly 58 percent of Brewster’s population is 55 or older. However, there are issues where people want more information. These include understanding more about Brewster’s proposed Municipal Affordable Housing Trust and how to create public/private funding strategies to address housing challenges, how to simplify the permitting process for businesses and home owners, what a Coastal Adaptation Strategy means for public beaches and landings, and how to best create opportunities for volunteers that match people’s skills to the town’s needs. Although some respondents indicated a desire for greater use of advanced wastewater treatment systems, others sought more information on the issue. The Vision Advisory Group will hold two final workshops, Tuesday, May 1 from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. and Wednesday, May 2 from 9:30 - 11:30 a.m., both at the Brewster Baptist Church. Results of the entire survey will be shared at the workshops and a Draft Vision Plan will be presented. Participants will help plan next steps for implementation. They will identify the role of the town in the plan as well as how non-town-affiliated organizations can help to further the plan’s implementation. Most importantly, individual participants will help identify how they can get involved. Brewster’s Vision Plan is not just a written document; it is a framework to guide decisions and identify the actions needed to ensure the community’s vision becomes a reality. The full survey results are on the Town of Brewster website brewster-ma.gov Patricia Hess and Don Keeran are members of the Brewster Vision Advisory Group Actions VPC Meeting March 21 2022 Actions Responsibility Time Review survey data and comments by team and present to whole group: All April 4 and April 19 Send out Bar Graphs of survey comments to All Sharon T April 4 Send 2018 article on survey results to all Patricia April 4 Send communication flyer to Ellen; Ellen will send to all Fran and Ellen April 4 Send 2017 Housing production Plan to Ellen’ Ellen will send to all Sharon R. and Ellen April 4 Next Meeting All April 4