The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About07 July 19, 2004 Technical AdvisoryTIME: DATE: LOCATION: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITT MEETING AGENDA* 10:00 A.M. July 19, 2004 RECORDS 70/ Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Conference Room A, 3`d Floor *By request, agenda and minutes may be available in alternative format; i.e. large print, tape. COMMITTEE MEMBERS John Andoh, PVVTA Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of Blythe Mike Gow, City of Hemet Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert Keith Haan, City of Calimesa Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula George Johnson, County of Riverside Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta Jim Kinley, City of Murrieta Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Cis Leroy, SunLine Transit Wendy Li, Caltrans District 08 Amir Modarressi, City of Indio Habib Motlagh, Cities of Perris, San Jacinto, Canyon Lake Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Kahono Oei, City of Banning Anne Palatino, RTA Dan Patneaude, City of Desert Hot Springs Juan Perez, County of Riverside Amad Qattan, City of Corona Joe Schenk, City of Norco Ken Seumalo, City of Lake Elsinore Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG Allyn Waggle, CVAG Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells John Wilder, City of Beaumont Cathy Bechtel, Director Transportation Planning & Policy Development I1 3, a- RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. TIME: 10:00 A.M. DATE: July 19, 2004 LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Conference Room A, 3rd Floor In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the clerk of the Commission at (909) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SELF -INTRODUCTION 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — June 21, 2004 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (This is for comments on items not listed on the agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5. STATUS OF TUMF CALL FOR PROJECTS 6. STATUS OF SB 821 CALL FOR PROJECTS (Attachment) 7. CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE 8. STIP UPDATE — IMPACT OF STATE BUDGET Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 19, 2004 Page 2 9. PROJECT MILESTONES — JULY UPDATE (Attachment) 10. FTIP UPDATE 11. CETAP UPDATE 12. JULY 14, 2004 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS 13. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS Reminder that the STP Rehab TAC Subcommittee will convene immediately following the July 19 TAC meeting at RCTC. 14. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be August 16, 2004 in Riverside.) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, June 21, 2004 1. Call to Order The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 a.m., at Banning City Hall Civic Center, 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA. 2. Self -Introductions Members Present: Others Present: Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of Blythe Julie Dauer, City of Temecula Ryan Gayler, City of Palm Desert Mike Gow, City of Hemet Keith Haan, City of Calimesa Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula Ned Ibrahim, City of Corona Tim J:onasson, City of LaQuinta Jim Kinley, City of Murrieta Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Amir Modarressi, City of Indio Russ Napier, City of Murrieta Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Kahono Oei, City of Banning Juan Perez, County of Riverside Amad Qattan, City of Corona Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells Shirley Gooding, RCTC Ken Lobeck, RCTC •—" Shirley Medina, RCTC Hazem Mobarek, W. Koo & Associates 3. Approval of Minutes No objections. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting June 21, 2004 Page 2 4. Public Comments There were no public comments. 5. OVERVIEW OF STATE AND FEDERAL FUND PROGRAMS Shirley Medina, RCTC, presented an overview of the federal and state transportation funding program and answered related questions. 6. PROJECT DELIVERY AND OBLIGATION ISSUES Shirley Medina announced the new Caltrans Local Assistance Chief, Wendy Li, who will start her new position in July. There was discussion of various problems the agencies have encountered and Ms. Medina suggested that the TAC members send her an e-mail stating some of the difficulties they have and she will pass the information to Ms. Li. It was suggested that Ms. Li attend the September, 2004 TAC meeting. 7. 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) STATUS UPDATE Ken Lobeck, RCTC, stated that approval of the 2004 RTIP by the federal agencies is scheduled for October, 2004, as long as no issues arise with conformity. 8. SB 821 EVALUATION COMMITTEE MEETING Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells, reminded the TAC that the SB 821 Evaluation Committee Meeting is scheduled for June 30. Shirley Medina provided Jerry Rivera's corrected schedule of presenters and pointed out that there is one change in the schedule (City of Coachella replaced City of Murrieta on the timetable). 9. JUNE 9, 2004 COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS The Commission Connection was provided to the TAC. 10. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Wassil reminded the TAC that the STP Rehab TAC Subcommittee will convene immediately following the July 19 TAC meeting at RCTC offices. He also stated that he will be on vacation during the next TAC meeting, July 19, 2004, and that Tom Boyd, City of Riverside, will chair that meeting. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting June 21, 2004 Page 3 Ms. Medina announced that the 2004 STIP adoption is scheduled for the August CTC meeting and it is anticipated that the CTC will commence allocating projects in August. She further announced that Marilyn Williams, RCTC, sent information to the cities regarding the request for project submittals for TUMF funds and that interested parties should contact Ms. Williams. - Ms. Medina stated that regarding the July Commission meeting, there will be an information item regarding CVA'G's approval of 1) $10M of TUMF funds on the Ramon Road Interchange for right of way mitigation; and 2) TUMF funds will also be placed on the 1-10 and Palm Drive/Gene Autry Interchange to replace TCR funds. She said that the following counties have been approved for the November ballot for sales tax measures/extensions: San Diego, San Bernardino, Ventura, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Solano and Sacramento. 11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 A.M. The next meeting is scheduled for July 19, 2004, 10:00 A.M., Riverside County Transportation Commission office. Respectfully submitted, v,s4t Shirley M ina Program Manager AGENDA ITEM 5 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 5. AGENDA ITEM 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: July 14, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation "Committee As A Whole" Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: FY 2004-05 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendation BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION "COMMITTEE AS A WHOLE" AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 2004-05 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program recommended funding as shown on the attached schedule. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In April, Commission staff notified the cities, the county and local school districts that an estimated $1,026,768 would be available for programming in FY 2004-05 through the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. This program is funded by an allocation of 2% of the total Local Transportation Funds (LTF) apportioned to Riverside County by the State and funds carried -over from prior years. Carryover funds available this year totaled $192,656 from higher estimated revenues and from previously approved projects which either did not expend their full allocation due to lower than estimated actual costs or were subsequently abandoned by the applicants for various reasons. Total available funds for FY 2004-05 are $1,219,424. The SB 821 proposals were due May 28, 2004. The Commission received 46 proposals (2 bicycle projects, 38 sidewalk projects, 6 ADA related retrofit projects) from 18 agencies requesting a total of $3,305,928 (Attachment I). An evaluation committee comprised of three members from the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee and three members from the Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the proposals on June 30, 2004. All of the applicants were invited to the meeting and requested to present their proposals to the committee and answer questions from the members. The proposals were evaluated and ranked based upon the Commission adopted scoring criteria (Attachment II). The committee's recommended funding is shown on Attachment III. Attachments: 1) SB 821 Program Submittals FY 2004-05 2) SB 821 Evaluation Criteria 3) SB 821 FY 2004-05 Recommended Funding (not available at this time) -Attachment RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2004-05 Agency ! Project Banning (8) Nicolet Middle School - George St. & Alessandro Williams St. Sidewalk George St. Sidewalk 20th St. Sidewalk Lions Park Sidewalk Hermos Ave. Sidewalk Nicolet St. Sidewalk Hoffer St. Sidewalk Total Total SB 821 Funds Local Cost Requested Match $67,000 $33,500 i $33,500 $73,000 $36,500 $36,500 $29,000 $14,500 $14,500 $36,000 $18,000 $18,000 $60,000 $30,000 $30,000 ' $22,000 $11,000 $11,000 $110,000 $55,000 $55,000 $90,000 $45,000 $45,000 $487,000 $243,500 $243,500 Blythe (4) S. Solano St. Sidewalk $29,000 $23,200 $5,800 Solano St. Sidewalk $29,150 $23,320 $5,830 Chanslorway Sidewalk $22,600 $20,340 $2,260 N. Carlton Ave. Sidewalk $26.750 $24,075 $2,675 Total $107,500 $90,935 $16,565 Calimesa School Bus Stop Project Coachella De Oro Park Improvement Project Corona Accessibility to North Main Corona Metrolink Commuter Train Station Desert Hot Springs (2) Mesquite Ave. Sidewalk West Drive Sidewalk Total Hemet Charlton & Lincoln Sidewalk & Access Ramp Proj. $160,409 $144,368 $16,041 $52,500 $42,000 $10,500 $182,000 $154,700 $27,300 $51,500 $35,000 $16,500 $47,000 $30,000 $17,000 $98,500 $65,000 $33,500 $112,681 $56,341 $56,340 Attachment 1 RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2004-05 Total SB 821 Funds Local Agency / Project Cost Requested Match Indio (3) Indio Blvd. Sidewalk Improve. - Various Sections $198,000 $180,000 $18,000 Indio Blvd. Sidewalk Improve. - Park St/Civic Ctr. $48,400 $44,000 $4,400 Jefferson St./Dune Palms Road Sidewalk $27,500 $25,000 $2,500 Total $273,900 $249,000 $24,900 Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore Outlet Channel Pedestrian & $694,718 $494,718 $200,000 Bicycle Corridor Project La Quinta (2) Avenue 52 Bicycle Lane Striping Project $20,209 $10,104 $10,105 Westward Ho Dr. Sidewalk Project $50,198 $25,099 $25,099 Total $70,407 $35,203 $35,204 Moreno Valley (2) Ironwood Ave. Sidewalk $110,000 $55,000 $55,000 Access Ramps at Various Locations $80,000 $40,000 $40,000 Total $190,000 $95,000 $95,000 Palm Desert Florida Ave. Sidewalk Project $650,576 $325,388 $325,188 Palm Springs Pedestrian Safety Sidewalk Project $119,400 $79,400 $40,000 Perris Perris Blvd/Mildred Ave Sidewalks & Ramps $120,000 $60,000 $60,000 Attachment RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2004-05 Agency 1 Project Total SB 821 Funds Local Cost Requested Match Riverside (9) Alessandro Blvd. Sidewalk $104,100 $45,804 $58,296 Central Avenue Sidewalk $28,800 $14,400 $14,400 Cortez Street Sidewalk $93,000 $46,500 $46,500 Maude St. Sidewalk $44,500 $22,250 $22,250 Philbin Ave. Sidewalk $81,750 $40,875 $40,875 Horace Street Sidewalk . $94,300 $47,150 $47,150 Victoria Avenue Sidewalk $321,820 $45,055 $276,765 Wheelchair Ramps $69,600 $34,800 $34,800 Vasquez Place Sidewalk $81,396 $40.698 $40,698 Total $919,266 $337,532 $581,734 Riverside County (6) Rider Street Sidewalk Wood Road Sidewalk Center St. Sidewalk Hastings Blvd. Sidewalk Grant St. Sidewalk Clinton St. Sidewalk Total San Jacinto Sidewalk & Ramps Improvement Project Temecula Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk $154,000 $108,000 $46,000 $430,000 $301,000 $129,000 $124,400 $87,080 $37,320 $56,000 $39,000 $17,000 $129,000 $90,000 $39,000 $65,000 $45,500 $19,500 $958,400 $670,580 $287,820 $150,000 $65,000 $85,000 $81,100 $60,825 $20,275 Grand Totals -18 Agencies 46 Projects $5,428,357 $3,269,490 $2.158.$67 Total SB 821 Funds Available $1,219,424 JR: 6/2/04 Rev. 7/1/04 Attachment II RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 EVALUATION CRITERIA FACTOR 1. USE The extent of potential use of a bicycle or pedestrian facility is the most important factor. Emphasis of this factor helps ensure the greatest benefits will be derived from the expenditure of SB 821 funds. Relative usage is to be derived from analysis of trip generators and attractors adjacent to the project. 2. SAFETY Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to correct current safety problems. 3. IMPORTANCE AS A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to attract users who would otherwise use an automobile. 4. MISSING LINK, EXTENSION, OR CONNECTIVITY Points are awarded to projects that link, are extensions of, or potentially connect to existing facilities. 5. MATCHING FUNDS This factor is used to help ensure that there is local funding participation in the project - not just an application for "free" money. One point would be awarded for each 5% of total project cost that is financed by the local agency. 6. POPULATION EQUITY The purpose of this factor is to help ensure that one agency does not receive all the funds. The applicant receives the maximum 10 points if the amount of funds requested does not exceed what the applicant would receive if the funds were allocated by population. Year to year totals are recorded so that an applicant could build up a "credit". (Calculated by RCTC) 7. PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY ENHANCEMENT The purpose of this factor is to enhance the physical accessibility of existing pedestrian projects. Applicant agencies may receive up to 10 "bonus" points for their project proposals which improve the physical access to existing facilities. MAXIMUM POINTS 25 20 20 15 10 10 10 BONUS RCTC: 04/12/1995 R an k Agency 1 Perris 2 Moren o Valley 3 La Quinta 3 San Jacinto 5 H emet 6 Bann ing 7 Desert Hot Sprin gs 8 Co achella 9 Riv erside 10 Riverside 11 Bann ing 12 Desert Hot Springs 13 Riv erside 14 Banning 15 Bann ing 16 Riverside 17 Moreno Valley 18 Temecula 19 Banning 19 Riv erside 21 La Qu inta 22 Palm Springs 23 Bann in g 24 Riverside 25 Blythe RI VERSIDE COUNTY TR ANSPORTATION COMMISSI ON SB 821 BIC YCLE AN D PEDEST RIA N F ACILITIES P ROGRAM FY 2004-05 RECOMME NDED F UNDIN G Project Description Perris Blvd/Mildred Ave Sidewalks/ Ramps Ironwood A ve. Sidewalk Westward Ho Dr, Sidewalk Sidewalk & Ramps Impro ve. Project Charlton/Lincoln Sidewalk/Access Ramps Nicolet Middle School-George/Alessandro West Driv e Sidewalk De Oro Park Improvement Project Victoria Ave. Sidewalk Philbin Ave, Sidewalk 20th Street Sidewalk Mesquite Av e. Sidewalk Horace St, Sidewalk Nicolet St, Sidewalk Williams St. Sidewalk Wheelchair Ramps A ccess Ramps Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk George St. Sidewalk Mau de St. Sidewalk A ve, 52 Bicycle Lane Stripin g Project Pedestrian Safety Sidewalk Project H offer St. Sidewalk Cortez St. Sidewalk N. Carlton Ave. Sidewalk Attachment III Total SB 821 Funds Recommended C ummulati ve Average Costs Req uested Allocatio n Funds Allocated Score $120,000 $60,000 $60,000 $110,000 $55,000 $55,000 $50,198 $25,099 $25,099 $150,000 $65,000 $65,000 $112,681 $56,341 $56,341 $67,000 $33,500 $33,500 $47,000 $30,000 $30,000 $52,500 $42,000 $42,000 $321,820 $45,055 $45,055 $81,750 $40,875 $40,875 $36,000 $18,000 $18,000 $51,500 $35,000 $35,000 $94,300 $47,150 $47,150 $110,000 $55,000 $55,000 $73,000 $36,500 $36,500 $69,600 $34,800 $34,800 $80,000 $40,000 $40,000 $81,100 $60,825 $60,825 $29,000 $14,500 $14,500 $44,500 $22,250 $22,250 $20,209 $10,104 $10,104 $119,400 $79,400 $79,400 $90,000 $45,000 $45,000 $93,000 $46,500 $46,500 $26,750 $24,075 $24,075 $60,000 $115,000 $140,099 $205,099 $261,440 $294,940 $324,940 $366,940 $411,995 $452,870 $470,870 $505,870 $553,020 $608,020 $644,520 $679,320 $719,320 $780,145 $794,645 $816,895 $826,999 $906,399 $951,399 $997,899 $1,021,974 86.6 85.2 84.1 84.1 84,0 83.4 82.6 81.2 80 .8 80 .6 79.8 78.9 78.4 78 .2 78.0 77.8 76.4 75,6 74.0 74.0 71.9 70.8 70.4 70,0 69.7 Rank Aaencv 26 Riv erside County 26 Riverside Coun ty 28 Riverside 29 Blythe 30 Riverside Cou nty 31 Indio 32 Coron a 33 Indio 34 Indio 35 Riverside County, 36 Riverside Cou nty 37 Bann in g 38 Riv erside Coun ty 39 Riv erside 40 Palm Desert 41 Calimesa 42 Bann ing 43 Riv erside 44 Blythe 45 Blythe 46 Lake Elsinore Totals RI VE RSIDE CO UNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BIC YCLE AND PEDEST RIAN FACILITIES PROG RAM FY 2004-05 REC OMMENDED FUNDING Proiect Description Rider St. Sidewalk Gra nt St. Sidewalk Alessa ndro Blvd. Sidewalk Chanslorway Sidewalk Center St. Sidewalk Indio Blvd. Sidewalk - Vario us Locations Access. to N. Main Metrolink Statio n Indio Blv d. Sidewalk - Park St./Civic Ctr . Jefferson St./Dune Palms Road Sidewalk Hastings Blvd. Sidewalk Wood Road Sidewalk Lions Park Sidewalk Clinton St. Sidewalk Cen tral A ve. Sidewalk Florida Ave. Sidewalk School Bus Stop Project Hermosa A ve. Sidewalk Vasquez Place Sidewalk S. Solano St. Sidewalk Solan o St, Sidewalk Lake Elsinore Outlet Channel Pedestrian & Bicycle Corridor Project Total SB 821 Fu nds Costs Requested $154,000 $108,000 $129,000 $90,000 $104,100 $45,804 $22,600 $20,340 $124,400 $87,080 $198,000 $180,000 $182,000 $154,700 $48,400 $44,000 $27,500 $25,000 $56,000 $39,000 $430,000 $301,000 $60,000 $30,000 $65,000 $45,500 $28,800 $14,400 $650,576 $325,388 $160,409 $144,368 $22,000 $11,000 $81,396 $40,698 $29,000 $23,200 $29,150 $23,320 $694,718 $494,718 Attachment III Recommended Cummulative Average Allocation Fu nds Allocated Score $108,000 $1,129,974 69,5 $89,450 $1,219,424 69.5 $0 $1,219,424 68.6 $0 $1,219,424 68.5 $0 $1,219,424 67.9 $0 $1,219,424 67.2 $0 $1,219,424 66 .9 $0 $1,219,424 66.2 $0 $1,219,424 66 .0 $0 $1,219,424 65.9 $0 $1,219,424 65.5 $0 $1,219,424 64.6 $0 $1,219,424 62.9 $0 $1,219,424 62.8 $0 $1,219,424 62.6 $0 $1,219,424 61.5 $0 $1,219,424 60.0 $0 $1,219,424 57.8 $0 $1,219,424 55.3 $0 $1,219,424 50,3 $1,219,424 32.3 $5.428,357 $3,2.69,490 $1,219.424 AGENDA ITEM 7 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 7. AGENDA ITEM 8 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 8. AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 19, 2004 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Ken Lobeck, Staff Analyst THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel Director, Transportation Planning and Policy Development SUBJECT: CMAQ, DEMOT21, STP, STIP, and TEA funded Project Milestone Reports — July 2004 Required Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to receive notification of the July 2004 Project Milestone Reports Required Update for CMAQ, DEMOT21, STP, STIP, and TEA funded projects. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Requests for updated project milestone reports for unobligated CMAQ, DEMO, STP, STIP, and TEA funded projects will be sent out about July 15th. Although obligation updates have been accomplished for some of the projects recently, this is the first full update since February 2004. The report format has been revised slightly to include (1) additional monitoring fields RCTC staff will complete, (2) a modification to the milestone reports that combines multiple federally funded projects (e.g. CMAQ and STPL) into one report, and (3) updated STIP/RTIP programming years along with recent obligation estimates provided to RCTC. Please review the program years and phase schedules dates in addition to any other needed corrections. Project lead agencies will still only provide (1) updated project schedules (for PAED, PS&E, R/W, and Construction), (2) the estimated obligation date, and (3) the percent complete for applicable phases. Reports continue to be formatted as an Excel file without field protection (locked fields). Updated reports need to be returned to RCTC no later than July 30, 2004. The updated milestone reports will provide a clearer picture of the projects that plan to obligate their funds prior to the August deadline and beyond. AGENDA ITEM 10 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 10. AGENDA ITEM 11 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. AGENDA ITEM 12 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 12. Transportation Air Quality Fundamental (Transportation Air Quality 101) INSTRUCTORS: 24 Date: Oct 13-14, 2004 Place: Caltrans Dist 8 Local Assistance (Mervyn's Bldg.) Rooms 103 A&B Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., PE, Phone: 410-962-2177; Fax: 410-962-3419; Tianjia.Tang@FHWA.DOT.GOV 10 South Howard St.,Suite 4000, FHWA-RC, Baltimore, MD 21201 LENGTH OF COURSE: 2 Days PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT HOURS: 16 Hours COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course provides a comprehensive scientific principle, law/regulation, and current practices on transportation air quality. Its breadth -and -depth coverage will benefit both policy makers and technical practitioners. Twelve chapters as outlined in the course content below give not only a complete picture of air quality, but also the detailed step-by-step real world project/program practices. The material can be also used as reference and guide for practicing professional. Over 100 exercises with answers are provided to enhance participant's understanding of the material. COURSE CONTENT: 1.Atmospheric Physics: Atmosphere layer, composition, measurement unit, temperature, pressure, volume, PVT relationship, and gas solubility issues. 2.Atmospheric Chemistry: Formula, reaction, molecular weight, toxic exposure, VOC and NOx driven ozone issues. 3.Meteorology: energy transfer, wind, mixing, humidity, cloud/air mass, low/high pressure, fronts, sea/land breeze, inversion, and how these parameters affect air quality. 4.Emission/Pollutant: VOC, CO, 502, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, ozone, green house gas, emission classification, sources, and definitions 5.History: Federal Air Quality Legislation as Related to Transportation Program/Plan/Project Development 6.Legal Obligation: NAAQS, air monitoring, nonattainment designation, design value, and boundary line determination (8 -hr ozone and PM2.5) 7.Legal Obligation: State -Implementation Plan (SIP), objective, content, responsibility, and lead agency (8 -hr ozone and PM2.5). 8.Legal Obligation: Transportation Conformity, objective, content, responsibility, and lead agency (8 -hr ozone and PM2.5). 9.Tools Required: Emission factor (EF) modeling, objective, issues, and responsible party. 10.Tools Required: Program level TDF/VMT estimation and modeling. 11.Tools Required: Project level concentration modeling and methodology. 12.Cangestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Proaram (CMAQ): Objective, criteria, process, and agency responsibility. COST: The course is free for all State and local government agencies and private consultants actively working on public projects. US DOT, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, RESOURCE CENTER AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL SERVICE TEAM TEAM LEADER — BOB O'LOUGHLIN Rob ert.O' Lo ughlin@FHWA.D OT. GO V PHONE: 415-744-3823 FAX: 415-744-2620 2004 STIP STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS - COUNTY SHARES Does Not Include STIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing) ($1,000's) 35 0 4105 9 c l .,. S. Riverside Project Totals by Fiscal Year Project Totals by Com onent Agency Rte PPNO Project Voted Total Prior FY 051 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 RANIConst E & P PS&E R/w Sup C on Sup Caltrans 10 7D Ramon Rd interch improvements (02S-72) 3.7281 3,728 0 01 0 0 0(' 797 0 547 2,157 227 0 Caltrans 79 660 Hunter Rd-Domemgoni Pkwy, widen (02S-58) 3,988 3,988 0 0' 0 0 01 1.527' 0 1.000 1.012 449 0 Caltrans 215 1210 HO V,TCL, El Cerrito- Rt 60/91 (028-102)' (RIP) Sep -031 15,162 13,911 0 01 1,251 0 01 01 0 0 6,685 1,997 6,480 RCTC cash ??? AB 3090 reimburse (Rt 60/91/215)(02S-102)(RIP, 85%) 26,625 0 0 01 26,625 0 O1 0; 26,625 0 0 0 0 Caltrans I debt 121D IGARVEE debt (Rt 215, El Cerrito- Rt 60/91)(RIP, 85% 1 Dec -031 111,484 0 21,043 22,6111 22,610 22,610 22.6101 01111,484 0 0 0 0 Indio loc OM Indio 81, Jackson-Rt 111, rehab (delete 9-03) lapse 3251 325 0 0 0 0 01 01 325 0 _ 0 0 0 Riverside Co roc 1103 Van Buren BI, median, turnouts (delete 9-03) lapse 1,323, 1.323 0 01 0 0 0i 01 1,323 0 0 0 0 I Prior Commitments (No t Part of Target) 1 162,635 23.275 21.043 22.611 50.486 22.610 22.610L 2.324! 139.757 1.5471 9 .854 2.673 6.480 I 1 Indio loc OM !Indio Bl. Jackson-Rt 111. rehab (delete 9-03) lapsel -325 0 0 0 0 0 -325 01 -325 0 0 0, 0 Riverside Co loc 1103 IVan Buren BI. median, tumouts (delete 9-03) lapse -1,323 0 0 01 0 0 -1,323 0i -1,323 0 0 0 0 Caltrans ! 10 7D IRamon Rd interch improvements (02S-72 18,538 0 0 18,538 0 0 01 01 16,144 0 0 0 01 2,394 0 Caltrans 60 ® IHOV lanes. Rt 15 -Valley Way (RTIP) 1 3.261 01 0 0 01 0' 3 .261 0 01 'Caltrans 91 (Green River IC, aux Ins to Rt 71 (RIP (TCR #64 025-72 -� 0 0 0 0 3.889 01 01 3.889 0 0 0 0 RCTC _ cash 1109 1AB 3090 reimbursement (03-04 PPM)(02S-124) 16611 0 0 331 83 50 01 01 166 01 0 0 0 Coachella gsep 1002 !Dillon Rd. UPRR grade separation 4,55911 0 0 0 0 0 4.5591 0' 4.559 0 0 0 0 Cathederal City log 1001 IRamon Rd. Date Palm -east limit. improvements 1.385 0 0 1 1.3851 0 01 01 1.385 0 _ 0 _ 0 0 Coachella loc 9992 IDillon Rd. Rt 86-Rt 10. widen 2,117 0 0 0 0 2.117 0 0 2.117 0 0 0 0 -6 Hot Springs loc OL (Pierson BI, rehab pavement 627 0 0 6271 0 0 01 01 592 01 35 Oi 0 Moreno Valley loc 1005 IPerrls Blvd improvements 3,184 0 0 3,184 0 0 01 0 3.1841 01 0 01 0 Moreno Valley loc 9993 Reche Vista Dr realignment. signals 1.967 0 0 1.967 0 0 01 0 1.967 0 0 01 0 Murrieta loc 9991 IRt 15 Calif Oaks/Kalmia interchange improvs 7.366 0 0 2.224 5.142 0 0 2.224 5.142 0 0 01 0 Riverside 1 loc 9994 Van Buren BI, Jackson St -Santa A na River, widen 3,4651 0 0 0 3,465 0 01 0 3;465 0 0 0 0 Riverside Co loc 1101 IMiles Av, Clinton St. wide n 2,040 0 0 2,040 0 0 01 0 2,040 0 0 0 0 RCTC tdm 9801 IRideshare program 1,220 0 0 400 300 400 120! 0 1,220 0 0 0 0 RCTC 9803 IPlanning. programming. and monitoring 2.228 0 170 953 105 500 500 0 2,228 0 0 0 0 Blythe loc 96E Ilntake Blvd. Hobsonway-14th, widen, signal NEW I 1,0311 0 0 50 53 928 0 0 928 50 53 0 0 Blythe loc 5K ILovekin Bl. Rt 10 -14th, rehab/reconstruct NEW 8441 0 0 30 54 760 0 0 760 30 54 0 0 - RCTC loc 92A IRt 91, Mary St-Rt 60/215, HOV lanes, design NEW 13,070 0 0 0 13.070 0 0 0 0 0 13,070 0 0 Riverside Co loc 7G IRt 10 Indian Av interchange, widen OC, ramps NEW 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 Caltrans 101 7G (Indian Av interchange, widen OC, ramps NEW 13,112 0 0 0 0 13.112 0 0 11.520 0 0 0 1,592 Caltrans 101 53A Rt 10 Jefferson St interchange, wide n OC NEW 10,560 01 01 0 0 10,5601 0 0 8.840 0 0 0 1 ,720 Riverside Co loc 1105 De Frain Bl. Hobsonway-6th Av, reconstruct NEW 810 0 0 0 0 810! 0 0 810 0 01 0 0 Total Proposed Again st Reprogramming Target 95.791 0 3,431 30.046 25,657 33,126 3,531 . 4,224 72,569! 80 13,2121 0 5,706 Cumulative 3.431 33.477 59,134 92,260 95.791 Reprogramin Target, Fund Estimate 95,091 1 3.538 34,225 28,9531 28,375 0 Cumulativ e 3,538 37,763 66,716 95,0911 95,091 Total Belo w (Ov er) Reprogramming Target 107 4.286 7,582 2.831 (700) TE-Ellable Prolects RCTC 1 res 1 TE reserve 14,648 01 01 0 9,513 2,542 2,593! 0 14,648 0 0 0 0 California Transporta tion Commission Page 44 of 86 7/15/2004