HomeMy Public PortalAbout02 February 21,1998 Special Committee( cti5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SPECIAL COMMITTEE MEETING
8:00 a.m.
Saturday, February 21, 1998
University Village, Chancellor's Conference Room
1201 University Avenue, Room#207, Riverside
AGENDA
1. Call to Order.
2. Public Comments.
3. Presentations of Proposals.
A. Coachella Valley Association of Governments.
1. Portion of SB 45 funds to be distributed by formula.
2. Portion of SB 45 funds to be set aside for discretionary projects and programmed
by RCTC.
3. Proposal regarding extension of Measure A.
B. Western Riverside Council of Governments.
1. Portion of SB 45 funds to be distributed by formula.
2. Portion of SB 45 to be set aside for discretionary projects and programmed by
RCTC.
3. Proposal regarding extension of Measure A.
C. Private Agencies
1. Portion of SB 45 funds to be distributed by formula.
2. Portion of SB 45 funds to be set aside for discretionary projects and programmed
by RCTC.
3. Proposal regarding extension of Measure A.
4. Discussion of proposals and determine recommendation(s) to the Riverside County Transportation
Commission.
5. Adjournment.
PRIVATE SECTOR PROPOSAL SPLIT FOR SB 45 FUNDS
Return to source (RIP only), the following based on Measure A language:
Example: West 72.23% = 96.087 million, Coachella 26.39% = 35.106 million,
Palo Verde 1.38% = 1.836 million.
Fifteen percent of total funds of each area to be transferred by each area to a
discretionary fund to be allocated to special projects based on safety, economics
and congestion priorities, exclusive of rail. The fifteen percent recommendation
is based on changing the distribution of transit portion of funds from the SB 45
funds to return to source also.
The discretionary dollars would be allocated by RCTC based on the recommendation
of a committee representative of the various areas and political subdivisions of
Riverside County.
For this year only, $4.214 million of past RIP funds which were spent on Highway
86, would be deducted from the Coachella Valley share and retained by RCTC for
Western County use.
Committee members: Gary Albaugh
Garry Grant
Ed Kibbey
Bob Krieger
Larry Markham
Clayton Record
Dan Silver
Joan Sparkman
Mike Sterns
John Yasment
WRCOG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Special Meeting of February 19, 1998
ACTIONS from the Special Executive Committee Meeting:
The WRCOG Executive Committee supports the development and implementation of a
"daughter of Measure A" as soon as it is feasible to pass such a measure.
The WRCOG Proposal on the STIP funding formula is that:
— The formula chosen must be consistent with the provisions of Measure A;
— 10% of STIP funds would be made available as a discretionary funding pool which
would be allocated to non -Measure A projects on a competitive basis County -wide.
Transit funding is not part of the charge of the Special Committee and should not be part
of this discussion or any resulting funding formula.
Implications and application:
The implementation of this formula would make some $14.7 million dollars available to
projects, county -wide, in this current STIP cycle ("1998 STIP"). These funds could not
be expended on Measure A named projects. Over the life of the Measure, some $40
million would become available for non -Measure projects.
CVAG
• Cathedral City • Indian Wells • Palm Desert
• Coachella • Indio • Palm Springs
• Desert Hot Springs • La Quinta • Rancho Mirage
• County of Riverside
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
February 21, 1998
The Coachella Valley Association of Governments proposes the following compromise:
1. RIP Funds be allocated by Return to Source per Measure A ballot language which
means 72.23% for the west, 26.39% for the Coachella Valley, 1.38% for the Palo
Verde Valley. [The Desert will not protest the proposed use of IIP funds, all of which are
programed in west County. The ballot "Return to Source" formula, as opposed to the
formula passed by RCTC in December, drops the desert share of the RIP funds from
29.4% to 27.78%.]
2. Ten percent (10%) of each of the three regional RIP shares will go into a
discretionary pot for RCTC distribution based on safety or congestion priorities. In
doing so, it is recognized that Highway 86 was declared Riverside County's highest
priority for safety at the time of Measure A passage, hence the Highway 86 allocation
is considered consistent with the safety consideration and there is no "debt" to be
paid.
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200 • Palm Desert, CA 92260 • (760) 346-1127 • FAX (760) 340-5949
SPECIAL COMMITTEE MEETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1998
UCR CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
SIGN IN SHEET
NAME
ORGANIZATION
PHONE NO
lo t`i y0K�. S
� c- -
1�Y 314
2)ic-k k
( I Li
fZ) 0 -e f"- (c -r-
43 4-6,_ 0(,.. iv
Uk---/Y ai%
QW Z* ,,% i
a 2 (r°
1/4
,,Z
Cgc L (-714-6(::,
PaA fi1✓fir
f�Z—'
2.0
1--4 iiir6
.m.7-
& Fr? _
77
0°11>l =i a
72e./
411 ,4.74
ay og "Iry
9/3-3 cse
7-Fe,_-7W,,,Iht,t, f
4' m U
115 3iDo
6;AL rs
v (.
v
.01.1:44,4e,_-
M q�1 4-
► ,- i:-., X r,
St/5'401
6..s ---ti -2.e,/ )
CI z7;-o�
Q o/
f
(4- s�',�-�(-,a,�►�e
kik,g46, vl,e-)
1'
/CPS ceCw"22
L'( u
A Ot-s4 3
2.73- (030
fl
,NA.
cc 0R--- av-„,r,. cA
736- 22-c f -
c41 Pr% -4..A.. -A �c
�s`tI -9yv
4H/&i47?A/
nn ��
kil ZeoVc1; r ..'FI ,z.P,Er4,
74/17;//:33:-
;:i9c- �UC/`
.:1--
( tit -k / Yr+tF
Lift.tKitas,-i-
7`13--9e0/
yV-r--1 4
s" 07303
,
kir-e.A
------ --/- friA-04 I A
n'.2.- 155/
'c - t:› W 1.761
‘V- Uc,,
1.15 -)°Wt
i,tivP
- ,,✓P c, 6
3Y10 0-13
SPECIAL COMMITTEE MEETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1998
UCR CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
SIGN IN SHEET
NAME
ORGANIZATION
PHONE NO
. ��144=1-1.av ""
j t AP--- J
?.yS =-t Od--c)
- Liter
3%/- q092
C *64-11,14
ViffiPef7
l
_
elf f- 4.0
ineyedioAN Magiumz 62o4)
(80e4 --‘,16=a
/(5 2---1)
hilli
R cm
C•A ri.\ i
r� N
C S A_ . � I
(57 - g?/ 9'-
J r,-.�
/4w St
G�✓L C 6(-
7? -7- 1 f
61
/tt17
g$4Vf14 ISA)
7.15' I OM
V
elf.r « ;aLco>
Sc eerk CI p4
71 L. -1;v/
.6,—_5-4. N
0 v / --/4.z_._
nt a ✓/ ---