Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12 December 8, 2004 Commission• TIME: • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA 9:00 a.m. RECORDS DATE: Wednesday, December 8, 2004 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside Commissioners Chairman: Roy Wilson 1st Vice Chairman: Robin Lowe 2nd Vice Chairman: James A. Venable Bob Buster, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside James A. Venable, County of Riverside Roy Wilson, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Art Welch / John Machisic, City of Banning Roger Berg / Jeff Fox, City of Beaumont Robert Crain / George Thomas, City of Blythe Shenna Moqeet / John Chlebnik / Jon Winningham, City of Calimesa Mary Craton, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Paul Marchand, City of Cathedral City Juan M. DeLara / Richard Macknicki, City of Coachella Jeff Miller / Jeff Bennett, City of Corona Matt Weyuker / Henry "Hank" Hohenstein, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin Lowe / Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet Percy L. Byrd / Robert A. Bernheimer / Mary Roche, City of Indian Wells Michael H. Wilson / Gene Gilbert, City of Indio Terry Henderson / Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Frank West / Charles White, City of Moreno Valley Kelly Seyarto / Jack van Haaster, City of Murrieta Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco Dick Kelly / Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert Ronald Oden / Ginny Foat, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris Ron Meepos / Harvey Gerber, City of Rancho Mirage Ameal Moore / Steve Adams, City of Riverside Chris Buydos / Jim Conner, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Anne Mayer, Director, Caltrans District 8 Eric Haley, Executive Director Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Comments are welcomed by the Commission. /f you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission. • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, December 8, 2004 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Public Comment Section is for items not listed on the agenda. Comments relating to an item listed on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed.) 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - November 10, 2004 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 2 6. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6A. PROPOSED 2005 COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULE Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt the proposed 2005 Commission and Committee meeting schedule. Page 1 6B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-020, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING THE APPENDIX OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974" Page 4 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 04-020, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending the Appendix of the Conflict of Interest Code Pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974". 6C. FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 COMMISSION AUDIT RESULTS Page 10 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2003-2004: 1) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report; 2) Local Transportation Fund Audited Financial Statements; 3) State Transit Assistance Fund Audited Financial Statements; 4) Compliance Report; 5) Audit Results Report; 6) Agreed -Upon Procedures Report related to the Commuter Assistance Program incentives; and, 7) Agreed -Upon Procedures Report related to the Appropriation Limit Calculation. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 3 • • 6D. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-019, "DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM PROCEEDS OF INDEBTEDNESS" Page 99 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 04-019, "Declaration of Official Intent of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from Proceeds of Indebtedness". 6E. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page 102 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the period ended September 30, 2004. 6F. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the month ended October 31, 2004. Page 111 6G. FOLLOW-UP ON STIP/STPL FUND TRADE FOR STATE ROUTE 79 WIDENING PROJECT FROM HUNTER ROAD TO DOMENIGONI PARKWAY Page 113 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve trading $3.55 million of delayed State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds with federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for the SR 79 widening project as a follow-up to the January 2004 Commission action. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 4 6H. APPROVE AGREEMENT NO. 05-31-527, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE STATE ROUTE 91 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-1152, BETWEEN CALTRANS AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO PREPARE PROJECT APPROVAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 HOV LANE PROJECT FROM ADAMS STREET TO 60/91/215 INTERCHANGE Page 114 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-31-527, Amendment No. 1 to the SR 91 Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1152, to increase the Caltrans oversight costs by $234,000, which will be funded from the current Traffic Congestion Relief allocation; and, 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • 61. CITY OF RIVERSIDE REQUEST TO REPROGRAM REGIONAL • IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS Page 116 Overview This item if for the Commission to approve the City of Riverside's request to reprogram State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds from the Van Buren widening project (Jackson Street to the Santa Ana River) to the State Route 91 Van Buren Interchange. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 5 • • • 6J. CITY OF RIVERSIDE REQUEST TO REPROGRAM TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES FUNDS Overview This item is for the Commission to: 6K. Page 117 1) Approve the reprogramming of $277,000 of Transportation Enhancement Activities funds from the University Streetscape project to the Victoria Restoration project; 2) Deprogram the remaining $225,000 of TEA funds from the University Streetscape project to allow the city to move forward with the project using local funds; and, 3) Allow the City of Riverside to trade the remaining $225,000 with another Commission approved federal project by January 30, 2005. TUMF REGIONAL ARTERIAL PRIORITY PROJECT RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY OF MORENO VALLEY Page 119 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Reche Vista/Reche Canyon realignment and widening project submitted by the City of Moreno Valley as eligible for TUMF Regional funding pursuant to the Commission's call for projects; and, 2) Program $409,000 in TUMF Regional funds for Project Development (PA&ED) work and incorporate the project into the five-year TUMF Regional Arterial Program for the period FY 2005 to FY 2009. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 6 6L. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 05-31-524, WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (CHP) FOR CONSTRUCTION ZONE ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (COZEEP) SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HOV) LANES ON STATE ROUTE 60 IN MORENO VALLEY Page 121 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-31-524 with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) services during construction of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on State Route 60 in Moreno Valley, for a not to exceed contract amount of $100,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 6M. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 05-31-525, AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-042, WITH BERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/ INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE STATE ROUTE 60 HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HOV) MEDIAN WIDENING PROJECT IN MORENO VALLEY Page 123 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-31-525, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 02-31-042, with Berg & Associates, Inc. to provide additional Construction Management/Inspection Services for the construction of the State Route 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) median widening project in Moreno Valley, for a not to exceed contract amount of $500,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 7 • • 6N. PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDITS: FISCAL YEARS 2000-2001 THROUGH 2002-2003 Page 126 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the progress report on implementing recommendations from RCTC's Triennial Performance Audit conducted for FYs 2000-2001 through 2002-2003. 60. FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 TRANSIT OPERATORS' REPORT Page 129 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the FY 2003-04 Transit Operators' Report. 6P. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Page 134 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Operational Evaluation Recommendation Summary which will be presented to the SunLine Transit Agency's Board at its December 1, 2004 meeting. 6Q. AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Page 141 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the FY 2004-05 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the County of Riverside. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 8 6R. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 05-33-526, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT NO. 04-33-009, WITH EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS, INC. TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES FOR THE PERRIS MULTI -MODAL STATION Page 209 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-33-526, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 04-33-009, with Epic Land Solutions, Inc. to provide additional Right -of -Way Services for the Perris Multi - Modal Station Project in Perris, for a not to exceed contract amount of $30,175; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 6S. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 213 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 6T. 2004 BEACH TRAIN PROGRAM SUMMARY Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2004 Beach Train Program Summary as an information item. Page 230 • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 9 7. AB 3090 REIMBURSEMENT / STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) AMENDMENT FOR STATE ROUTE 60 WIDENING PROJECT FROM VALLEY WAY TO INTERSTATE 15 Page 245 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Commit $13.046 million of local Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds as a loan to replace $3.261 million of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds and $9.785 million of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds for the SR 60 widening project; 2) Enter into Agreement No. 05-31-528, an AB 3090 agreement, with Caltrans and designate the SR 60/1-215 East Junction direct connector as a replacement for the SR 60 widening project by programming $13.046 million ($3.261 million RIP and $9.785 million IIP) in FY 2007-08; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and, 4) Commit future RIP funds, with interest, on designated interchanges on the TUMF network as repayment of the $13.046 million TUMF loan. 8. PRESENTATION ON WAYSIDE HORN DEMONSTRATION IN RIVERSIDE Page 248 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file presentation on the City of Riverside's Wayside Horn Demonstration Project. 9. ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Overview This item is for: Page 249 1) The Commission to elect the officers of the Commission — Chair, Vice Chair, and Second Vice Chair; 2) The Cities of Riverside, Corona, and Moreno Valley to select their representative to the Executive Committee; and, 3) The Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, San Jacinto, and Temecula to select their representative to the Executive Committee. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda December 8, 2004 Page 10 10. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 11. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. 12. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 13. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, January 12, 2005, Board Room, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • • • • AGENDA ITEM 4 • Minutes • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION • • • MINUTES Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chairman Roy Wilson at 9:02 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley Roger Berg Daryl Busch Bob Buster Chris Buydos Percy Byrd John Chlebnik Juan DeLara Frank Hall Terry Henderson Hank Hohenstein Dick Kelly Robin Lowe Bob Magee Paul Marchand Anne Mayer Jeff Miller Ameal Moore Ronald Oden Ron Roberts Kelly Seyarto Jim Venable Jack Wamsley Art Welch Frank West Michael H. Wilson Roy Wilson Robert Crain Ron Meepos John F. Tavaglione* *Commissioner John Tavaglione assigned his proxy vote to Commissioner Marion Ashley. A letter has been filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests from the public to speak. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S/C (Hohenstein/Ashley) to approve of the November 10, 2004 minutes as submitted. Abstain: Chlebnik 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Kelly Seyarto requested Agenda Item 6N, "Authorization for Development and Release of a Request for Proposal for a Western Riverside County Rail Feasibility Study" be pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion. M/S/C (Henderson/Hohenstein) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 6A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended September 30, 2004. 6B. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT Receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the month ended September 30, 2004. 6C. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 3 6D. RESOLUTION NO. 04-018, "EMPLOYER PICKUP RESOLUTION PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SERVICE CREDIT PURCHASES (CONTRIBUTION CODE 14)" Adopt Resolution No. 04-018, "Employer Pickup Resolution Pre -Tax Payroll Deduction Plan for Service Credit Purchases (Contribution Code 14)", to allow an option for its employees to purchase additional service credits using pre-tax dollars. There is no employer contribution towards employee purchasing additional service credits. 6E. PROJECT STATUS REPORT OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDED PROJECTS Receive and file the Project Status Report of Federal and State funded projects. 6F. TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES FUNDS SIX-MONTH EXTENSION REQUEST Receive and file the Transportation Enhancement Activities Funds Six - Month Extension Request. 6G. AWARD AGREEMENT NO. 05-33-519 (AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-2128) TO STV INCORPORATED FOR SERVICES RELATED TO THE NEW START APPLICATION FOR THE PERRIS VALLEY LINE PROJECT 1) Award Agreement No. 05-33-519 (Amendment No. 9 to Agreement No. RO-2128) to STV Incorporated for additional scope of work related to the final environmental assessment, rerun of SCAG's transit model, update of the New Start application, and BNSF coordination for the Perris Valley Line project for an additional base amount of $548,430; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Allocate an additional $500,000 of STA funds and increase the FY 2004-05 Rail Capital budget to accommodate the allocation; and, 4) Amend the FY 2004-05 Commuter Rail Short Range Transit Plan to reflect these changes. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 4 6H. APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. M-24-006 FOR THE FUNDING AND JOINT DEVELOPMENT OF STATE HIGHWAY 111 IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. M-24-006 for the funding reimbursement of State Highway 111 improvements within the City of La Quinta; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the memorandum of understanding on behalf of the Commission. 61. AMENDMENT TO THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TO PURCHASE ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT Approve an amendment to the Riverside Transit Agency's FY 2004-05 Short Range Transit Plan to purchase Advanced Traveler Information System Equipment at a cost of $72,81 5 in Section 5309 funds. 6J. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION • RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Receive and file the Operational Evaluation Recommendation Summary, which was approved by SunLine Transit Agency's Board at its October 27, 2004 meeting. 6K. MEASURE "A" SPECIALIZED TRANSIT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 AND FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 CALL FOR PROJECTS - CITY OF CALIMESA AND CARE CONNEXXUS 1) Allocate $30,000 to the City of Calimesa and $65,000 to Care Connexxus, Inc., in Measure "A" Specialized Transit funds available in western Riverside County; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute Agreement No. 05-26-521 for City of Calimesa and Agreement No. 05-26-522 for Care Connexxus, Inc., on behalf of the Commission. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 5 • 6L. APPROVE THE FUND TRANSFER AGREEMENT NO. 05-45-520 BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE OPERATION OF A FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1) Approve the Fund Transfer Agreement No. 05-45-520 between the State of California Department of Transportation and the Riverside County Transportation Commission for the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol program in the amount of $1,071,368 in State funding for FY 2004-05; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 6M. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. • • 60. SURPLUS OF PERRIS WYE PROPERTY 1) Declare the property identified as the Perris Wye Property, a portion of APN 313-271-018, as surplus, as shown on the attached parcel map; and, 2) Authorize staff to initiate the sixty (60) day public agency notification period and if no interest is expressed, authorize the Executive Director to offer the parcels for sale. 7. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND TRANSPORTATION MEASURES UPDATE John Standiford, Director of Public Information, updated the Commission on the results of the transportation measures on the ballot for November 2nd, noting that the counties of Costra Costa, Marin, Sacramento, San Bernardino, and Mateo passed their transportation measures and the results for counties of San Diego and Sonoma have not been determined. He also provided an update on the approval of the Federal Tax Reform Act that addresses ethanol taxation, the Federal Appropriations Bill, the reauthorization of TEA -21, and the State budget crisis including the suspension of Proposition 42 and the efforts of the business community and transportation agencies to prevent its continued suspension. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 6 Eric Haley, Executive Director, added that Proposition 42 is a local government issue because 40% of the funds are allocated to road maintenance. Due to the passage of a number of transportation measures, the debate to lower the 2/3rds voter threshold is anticipated to be put aside. Commissioner Bob Buster requested updated data on the factors considered in determining the overall score and priority group for the Commission's grade separation priority list. Also, he requested staff to communicate with the City of Riverside to ensure estimation of rail noise and delays are congruent with their planning efforts. In addition, he requested a report on the stationary horn demonstration program by the City of Riverside. John Standiford noted that the Federal government is finalizing regulations for the use of quiet zones. M/S/C (Marchand/Henderson) to receive and file the update on State and Federal Legislation and the results of the transportation measures on the ballot for November 2"d as an information item. 8. PRESENTATION — TUMF REVENUE PROJECTIONS David Taussig, President of David Taussig and Associates, provided an overview of the process to develop the western Riverside County TUMF revenue projections. Mike Reynolds, the Concord Group, presented the demand analysis including the methodology for forecasting future demand and growth factors. David Taussig reviewed the following areas: • Projected Development by TUMF Zone • Growth Scenarios • Projected Gross Revenues and Building Permit Issuance Summaries • Exempt Development Percentages • Projected Net Revenues Commissioner Bob Buster requested a report of exemption by jurisdiction and expressed belief that jurisdictions should not be able to use TUMF or Measure "A" funds to make-up for exemptions granted. He also suggested a system of accountability to monitor and review exemptions. • w Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 7 • • • David Taussig confirmed that the full report includes a report of exemptions by jurisdiction. In response to Commissioner Roger Berg's concern for the accuracy of the data, David Taussig responded that data was based on written documentation was received from each jurisdiction and was not changed to produce the report. Commissioner Robin Lowe requested a copy of the full report and concurred with Commissioner Buster's comments to analyze the impact of exemptions. Commissioner Paul Marchand asked that, in the future, Commissioners be provided a full version of reports. Chairman Wilson requested that staff provide a copy of the full report to Commissioners desiring one. M/S/C (Marchand/DeLara) to receive and file the western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Revenue Projections and presentation prepared by David Taussig and Associates, Inc. No: Berg, Chlebnik, Wamsley, Welch Abstain: Buydos 9. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 6N. AUTHORIZATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND RELEASE OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR A WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY In response to Commissioner Kelly Seyarto's request for clarification regarding the study's relation to southwestern Riverside County, Eric Haley indicated that there is a strong constituency and interest to extend rail service to the Pass area, Coachella Valley, and the Temecula-Murrieta area. The study will provide data and costs for those areas. M/S/C (Seyarto/Lowe) to authorize the development and release of a Request for Proposal for the purpose of performing a Western Riverside County Commuter Rail Feasibility Study. M Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 8 10. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Eric Haley announced: • Focus on the Future: Self -Help Counties Coalition will be held in La Quinta on November 14th -16th • California Transportation Commissions meetings will be held at the Riverside County Administrative Center December 8th and 9th • Will Kempton was appointed by the Governor as Caltrans' next Director. B. Commissioner Jack Wamsley announced that this is his last attendance representing Canyon Lake as he chose not to bid for reelection. 11. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Negotiating Parties: RCTC — Executive Director or Designee Property Owners — See List Below Item APN Owner 1 347-1 10-072 347-110-073 Rachel Schwenn 2 347-110-033 Norma Federow 347-1 10-057 3 347-110-059 347-110-070 Nicolas and Kathryn Abood 347-1 10-077 4 347-110-011 Robert Hildom 5 347-110-010 Eleanor Armstong and Barbara Page 6 347-1 10-030 James and Michael Duffy 347-110-016 347-110-018 7 347-110-023 Adel Abusamra 347-1 10-029 347-110-031 8 347-110-063 347-110-065 Adel Abusamra • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes November 10, 2004 Page 9 There were no announcements from Closed Session. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 a.m. in memory of the Riverside County residents that have lost their lives in the war in Iraq and Commissioner Shenna Moqeet's daughter. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, December 8, 2004, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Board Room, Riverside, California, 92501. Respectfully submitted, Naty Kopenhaver Clerk of the Commission • • AGENDA ITEM 6A • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed 2005 Commission and Committee Meeting Schedule STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt the proposed 2005 Commission and Committee meeting schedule. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Riverside County Transportation Commission has previously adopted the 2nd Wednesday of each month for its full Commission and Executive Committee meetings, the 4th Monday of each month for the Plans/Programs Committee and Budget/Implementation Committee meetings, and the 3rd Monday of each month for the Transit policy Committee. The County of Riverside's Board Chambers will continue to accommodate the Commission and Committee meetings, with the exception of the Transit Policy Committee. The Transit Policy Committee meetings, because of the size of its membership not requiring a large meeting room, will meet in the Commission's Conference Room "A". The December 26th Committee meetings and the February 21st Transit Policy Committee are proposed to be cancelled because of holidays. In addition, the Committees' November 28th may be cancelled if there are not substantive agenda items. In past years, the November and December Committee meetings were cancelled because of holidays and in order for staff to have sufficient time to prepare, mail, and post the agenda items for the full Commission meetings. In those cases when Committee meetings are cancelled, all of the agenda items are directly submitted to the full Commission for action. As in the past, the Commission/Committees may call for special meetings when a need arises. Attachment: Proposed 2005 Commission and Committees Meeting Schedule Agenda Item 6A VERSIDE COUNTY TRANR'ORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSED 2005 MEETING SCHEDULE Meeting Date (Wednesday) C ommissi on L ocation Exec utive Committee Location January 12 9:00 a.m. Board Room 8:00 a.m . RCTC Conf Rm A February 9 9:00 a.m. Board Room 8:00 a.m. RCTC Conf Rm A March 9 9:00 a .m . Board Room 8:00 a .m . RCTC Conf Rm A April 13 9:00 a .m. Board Room 8:00 a.m. RCTC Conf Rm A May 11 9:00 a .m . Board Room 8:00 a .m. ROTC Conf Rm A June 8 9:00 a .m. Board Room 8:00 a .m. RCTC Conf Rm A July 13 9:00 a.m . Board Room 8:00 a .m . RCTC Conf Rm A August 10 9:00 a. m. Board Room 8:00 a.m . RCTC Conf Rm A September 14 9:00 a.m. Board Room 8:00 a .m . RCTC Conf Rm A October 12 9:00 a.m. Board Room 8:00 a.m. RCTC Conf Rm A Nov ember 9 9:00 a.m. Board Room 8:00 a .m. RCTC Conf Rm A December 14 9:00 a. m. Board Room 8:00 a .m . RCTC Conf Rm A The Commission and the Executive Committee meetings are held on the 2nd Wednesday of each month. 2 PROPOSED 2005 MEETING SCHEDULE M eeting Date (Monday) Plans & Programs' Budget & Implementation' Location Meeting Date (Wednesday) Transit P olicy Committee3 Location Jan uary 24 12 Noon 10:00 a .m . Board Room January 17 1:00 p .m. RCTC Conf "A February 28 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. Board Room February 21* 1:00 Proposed to be Cancelled - Holiday p.m. March 28 12 Noon 10:00 a .m . Board Room March 21 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf "A" April 25 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. Board Room April 18 1:00 p .m . RCTC Conf "A" M ay 23 12 Noon 10:00 a .m . Board Room May 16 1:00 p .m. RCTC Conf "A" June 27 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. Board Room June 20 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf " A" July 25 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. Board Room July 18 1:00 p.m . RCTC Conf "A" August 22 12 Noon 10:00 a.m . Board Room August 15 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf "A" September 26 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. Board Room Septemb er 19 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf "A" October 24 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. Board Room October 17 1:00 p.m . RCTC Conf "A" November 282 12 Noon 10:00 a. m. Board Room November 21 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf "A" December 26* 12 Noon Proposed to be Cancelled RCTC Holiday December 19 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf "A" 'The meetings of the Plans & Pro grams Co mmittee and Budget & Implementation C ommitt ees' meetings are held on the 4th Monday of each month. 2The November 28`" Committee meetings may be cancelled if there are no substantive agenda items and in order to meet the mailout and posting requirements of the full Commission meeting agenda. 3 The Transit Policy Committee meetings are currently scheduled to be held the 3rd Monday of each month . Howe ver, Committee meetings may be changed to meet on either a bi-monthly or quarterly basis, depending on need. *This date is an RCTC holiday. • • • 7o/05 REVISION TO ATTACHMENT AGENDA ITEM 6A AGENDA ITEM NO. 6A AMENDED (See January 17th for Transit Policy Committee) PROPOSED 2005 MEETING SCHEDULE Meeting Date (Mo nday) January 24 February 28 March 28 April 25 May 23 June 27 July 25 Plans & Programs' 12 Noon 12 Noon 12 Noon 12 Noon 12 Noon 12 Noon 12 Noon Budget & Implementati on' 10:00 a .m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a .m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m . 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. L ocation Board Room Board Room Board Room Board Room Board Room Board Room Board Room August 22 September 26 October 24 November 282 December 26* 12 Noon 12 No on 12 Noon 12 Noo n 12 Noon 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a. m. 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Proposed to be Cancelled Board Room Board Room Board Room Board Room RCTC Holiday Meeting Date (Wednesday) January 17* February 21* March 21 April 18 May 16 June 20 July 18 Transit P olicy Committee3 1:00 p .m. 1:00 p .m. 1:00 p.m. 1:00 p .m . 1:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. Location Proposed to be Cancelled - Holiday Proposed to be Cancelled - Holiday RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf "A" August 15 September 19 October 17 November 21 December 19 1:00 p .m . 1:00 p.m. 1:00 p .m. 1:00 p.m . 1:00 p.m. RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf " A" RCTC Conf "A" RCTC Conf "A" 'The meetings of the Plans & Programs Co mmittee and Budget & Implementation Committees' are held on the 4th Monday of each mo nth. 2The November 28th Committee meetings may be cancelled if there are no substantive agenda items and in order to meet the mailout and posting requirements of the full Commissio n meeting agenda. 3 The Transit Policy Committee meetings are currently scheduled to be held the 3rd Monday of each month. However, Committee meetings may be changed to meet on either a bi-monthly or quarterly basis, depending on need . *This date is an RCTC holiday. Therefore, meeting scheduled on this date is cancelled or rescheduled . AGENDA ITEM 6B • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 04-020, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending the Appendix of the Conflict of Interest Code Pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974" STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 04-020, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending the Appendix of the Conflict of Interest Code Pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As required, the Riverside County Transportation Commission performs a biennial review of its Conflict of Interest Code. For this year, there is a need to amend the Appendix because of title changes of positions, additional positions to be designated in the Code, and the designation of disclosure categories for the position. Basically, the amended Appendix shows the list of positions who manage public investments, and positions to be governed under conflict of interest code and their respective disclosure categories as shown in Exhibit B. As required, the notice for amendment was posted under the Legal Notice Section in the newspaper. After the Commission has adopted the Amended Appendix, it will be submitted to the County of Riverside's Board of Supervisors for approval as they are the code - reviewing body for the Commission. In order to meet the requirements of the Conflict of Interest Code pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974, staff recommends that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 04-020 to make the appropriate changes to its Code. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 04-020 2) Amended Appendix Agenda Item 6B • • RESOLUTION NO. 04-020 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING THE APPENDIX OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974 WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California enacted the Political Reform Act of 1974, Government Code Section 81000 et seq (the "Act"), which contains provisions relating to conflicts of interest which potentially affect all officers, employees, and consultants of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") and requires all public agencies to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code; and WHEREAS, the Commission adopted a Conflict of Interest Code (the "Code") which was amended on December 13, 2000, in compliance with the Act; and WHEREAS, subsequent changed circumstances within the Commission have made it advisable and necessary pursuant to sections 87306 and 87307 of the Act to amend and update the Appendix of the Commission's Code; and WHEREAS, the potential penalties for violation of the provisions of the Act are substantial and may include criminal and civil liability, as well as equitable relief which could result in the Commission being restrained or prevented from acting in cases where the provisions of the Act may have been violated; and WHEREAS, notice of time and place of a public meeting on, and of consideration by the Commission of, the proposed amended Appendix was provided each affected designated employee and publicly posted for review and offices of the Commission; and WHEREAS, a public meeting was held upon the proposed amended Appendix at a regular meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission on December 8, 2004, at which all present were given an opportunity to be heard on the proposed amended Appendix. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to hereby adopt the proposed the amended Appendix of the Conflict of Interest Code, a copy of which is attached hereto and shall be on file with the Director of Administrative Services and available to the public for inspection and copying; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said amended Appendix shall be submitted to the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors for approval and said Appendix shall become effective 30 days after the Board of Supervisors approves the proposed amended Appendix as submitted. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of December 2004. Roy Wilson, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • 6 • • • L ISL TIVE VE ION (SHOWS CHANGES MADE) APPENDIX CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Amended December 8. 2004)3 EXHIBIT "A" OFFICIALS WHO MANAGE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS Commission Officials who manage public investments, as defined by 2 Cal. Code of Regs. § 18701(b), are NOT subject to the Commission's Code, but are subject to the disclosure requirements of the Act. (Government Code Section 87200 et seq.) [Regs. § 18730(b)(3)] These positions are listed here for informational purposes only. It has been determined that the positions listed below are officials who manage public investments4: Members of the Board of the Commission and their Alternates Executive Director Deputy Executive Director Chief Financial Officer Financial Consultants 5 3 Titles updated as of December 2002. 4 Individuals holding one of the above -listed positions may contact the FPPC for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The FPPC makes the7final determination whether a position is covered by § 87200. DESIGNATED POSITIONS GOVERNED BY THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES' DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES TITLE OR FUNCTION ASSIGNED Accounting Manager g Administrative Analyst 5 Director of Administrative Services 4, 5 Director of Regional Program & Public Affairs 6, 7 Director of Transportation Planning & Policy 2, 3, 6, 7 General Counsel 1, 2 Program Manager (ALL) 6, 7 Property Agent 3, 6 Rail Department Manager 1, 2 Director of Public Information 6 Consultants Consultants shall be included in the list of Designated Employees and shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in this Code subject to the following limitation: The Executive Director may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that are limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this Section. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of dis losure requirements. The Executive Director's determination is a public record and shall be 4tained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. • • • • EXHIBIT "B" DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of investments, business entities, sources of income, or real property which the Designated Employee must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she is assigned. Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income fr-e®„ --b-a iness .mss, that are located in do business in, or own real property within the jurisdiction of the Commission, sincsc or own business or owned real property within the jurisdiction of the Commis ion within the past two (2) years. Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the jurisdiction of the Commission. Category 3: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the Commission, plan to csion within the next year, Category 4: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that are banking, savings and loan, or other financial institutions. Category 5: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Commission. Category 6: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Designated Employee's Department. • 9 REVISION TO ATTACHMENT AGENDA ITEM 6B a EXHIBIT "B" DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES The disclosure categories listed below identify the types of investments, business entities, sources of income, or real property which the Designated Employee must disclose for each disclosure category to which he or she is assigned. Category 1: All investments and business positions in business entities, and sources of income from, business entities, that are located in. do business in . or own real property within the jurisdiction of the Commission, plan to do business or own real property within the jurisdiction of the Commission within the next ygar, or have done two (2) years. Category 2: All interests in real property which is located in whole or in part within, or not more than two (2) miles outside, the jurisdiction of the Commission. Category 3: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the Commission, plan to past two (2) years. Category 4: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that are banking, savings and loan, or other financial institutions. Category 5: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Commission. Category 6: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Designated Employee's Department. Category 7: All investments and business positions in, and sources of income from, business entities subject to the regulatory, permit, or licensing authority of the Designated Employee's Department, will be subject to such authority within the noxt yoar, or havo boon subjoct to such authority within tho past two (2) y ar; . AGENDA ITEM 6C • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Commission Audit Results AUDIT AD HOC COMMITTEE* AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2003-2004: 1) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report; 2) Local Transportation Fund Audited Financial Statements; 3) State Transit Assistance Fund Audited Financial Statements; 4) Compliance Report; 5) Audit Results Report; 6) Agreed -Upon Procedures Report related to the Commuter Assistance Program incentives; and, 7) Agreed -Upon Procedures Report related to the Appropriation Limit Calculation. *This item is scheduled to be reviewed by the Audit Ad Hoc Committee on December 1St If there is a variance in the above recommendations, this item will be requested to be pulled from the Consent Calendar. This is forwarded to the Commission prior to the review of the Committee to meet the mail out and posting requirements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In April 2003, McGladrey & Pullen LLP was selected to perform an audit of the Commission's basic financial statements included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), the Local Transportation Fund, the State Transit Assistance Fund, and federal awards. Additionally, it was requested to perform agreed -upon procedures related to the annual Appropriations Limit Calculation and the Commuter Assistance Program incentives. The audits and agreed -upon procedures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 have been completed, and all reports have been issued by McGladrey & Pullen. Agenda Item 6C 10 The Commission's CAFR consists of three sections: introductory, financial, and statistical. While the introductory and statistical sections were not audited by McGladrey & Pullen, the financial section was audited by McGladrey & Pullen. The Commission received an unqualified opinion on its basic financial statements from McGladrey & Pullen, which is the highest form of assurance. The audit report also includes an explanatory paragraph related to the change in classification of the Local Transportation Fund from a fiduciary fund to a governmental fund, because some of the assets in the fund could be used for the Commission's commuter rail program. Limited procedures were performed related to the required supplementary information, including Management's Discussion and Analysis; such information was not audited. The other supplementary information was subject to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and, in the opinion of the auditors, it is fairly stated in relation to the basic financial statements. The basic financial statements reflect the new reporting model as required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements —and Management's Discussion and Analysis —for State and Local Governments. The new reporting model was implemented in Fiscal Year 2001-2002; this is the third consecutive year under the new reporting model. The basic financial statements include government -wide financial statements and fund financial statements. Additionally, Management's Discussion and Analysis is required and provides a narrative overview and analysis of the Commission's financial activities for the fiscal year. Financial highlights include net assets of $215,606,433 at June 30, 2004, representing an increase of $72,594,229 from the prior year, and governmental funds fund balances of $245,374,366 at June 30, 2004, representing an increase of $52,184,203 from the prior year. The audit reports related to the separately issued financial statements of the Local Transportation Fund and the State Transit Assistance Fund also reflect unqualified opinions from McGladrey & Pullen. These financial statements are required to be issued separately under the Transportation Development Act; however, they are also included in the fund financial statements in the CAFR. These reports noted no matters considered to be a material weakness in internal control and no instances of noncompliance. The Compliance Report, often referred to as the Single Audit Report, includes the reports on compliance and internal control over financial reporting and over federal awards. These reports noted no matters considered to be material weaknesses in internal control and no instances of noncompliance. • • • Agenda Item 6C 11 • • • A management letter which usually includes recommendations for improvements and operational efficiencies related to internal control and other matters noted during the audit was not issued, as McGladrey & Pullen did not have any recommendations. The Appropriations Limit Calculation and Commuter Assistance Program reports are based on specific procedures agreed to by the Commission and other agencies. The auditors noted no exceptions or findings related to the procedures performed. Professional auditing standards require the auditors to communicate to the audit committee, or an equivalent group, to ensure that it is provided with additional information regarding the scope and results of the audit that may assist the group in overseeing management's financial reporting and disclosure process. Such required communications will be discussed with the Committee in a presentation by McGladrey & Pullen. Attachments: 1) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for FY 2003-04 2) Local Transportation Fund Financial and Compliance Report for FY 2003-04 3) State Transit Assistance Fund Financial Report for FY 2003-04 4) Compliance Report for FY 2003-04 5) Agreed -Upon Procedures Report on Appropriations Limit Calculation for FY 2003-04 6) Agreed -Upon Procedures Report on Commuter Assistance Program Incentives for FY 2003-04 7) Communications to the Audit Ad Hoc Committee Agenda Item 6C 12 Riverside County, CA • • • Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 Submitted by: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County, CA 14 • Contents Introductory Section Letter of Transmittal i Organizational Chart xi List of Principal Officials xii Certificate of Achievement xiii Financial Section • • Independent Auditor's Report 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3 Basic Financial Statements Government -wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Assets 13 Statement of Activities 14 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet —Governmental Funds 15 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets 16 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances —Governmental Funds 17 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 18 Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets 19 Notes to the Financial Statements 20 Required Supplementary Information Budgetary Comparison Schedules General Fund and Major Special Revenue Funds 37 Notes to Required Supplementary Information 38 Other Supplementary Information Nonmajor Governmental Funds 39 Combining Balance Sheet 40 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 41 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances —Budget and Actual: Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 42 Capital Projects and Debt Service Funds 43 Schedule of Expenditures for Local Streets and Roads by Geographic Area — All Special Revenue Funds 44 Schedule of Expenditures for Transit and Specialized Transportation by Geographic Area — All Special Revenue Funds 45 Schedule of Changes in Assets and Liabilities —Local Projects Agency Fund 46 Contents, Continued • Statistical Section Government -wide Revenues by Function 47 Government -wide Expenses by Function 48 Government -wide Net (Expenses) Revenues by Function 49 Government -wide Net Assets 50 General Revenues by Source 51 General Government Expenditures by Function 52 General Government Expenditures by Authorized Source 53 Governmental Funds —Fund Balances 54 Sales Tax Revenues by Program and Geographic Area —General and Special Revenue Funds 55 Taxable Sales and Population by City 56 Sources of County of Riverside Taxable Sales by Business Type 57 Computation of Legal Debt Margin 58 Ratio of General Bonded Debt Service Expenditures to Total General Governmental Expenditures 59 Miscellaneous Statistical Information 60 16 • • • "%*icy y. -a 17 S Y McGladrey& Pullen Certified Public Accountants • Independent Auditor's Report Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the Commission) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Commission's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. • • In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Commission as of June 30, 2004, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As discussed in Note 1 to the basic financial statements, the Commission determined that the Local Transportation Fund should be classified as a governmental fund instead of a fiduciary fund, as reported in the June 30, 2003 basic financial statements, because some of the assets in the fund could be used for the Commission's commuter rail program. As a result of the reclassification, the beginning balance of net assets for governmental activities in the statement of activities, and the fund balance for the governmental funds in the fund financial statements, increased $34,295,645. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated October 13, 2004 on our consideration of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The Management's Discussion and Analysis and budgetary comparison information, as listed in the table of contents, are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 1 18 McGladrey & Pullen Certified Public Accountants Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and other schedules, listed in the table of contents as other supplementary information, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying introductory and statistical sections, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. This information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. 4ee,e‘e04,7//1-6.eee..e__, Riverside, California October 13, 2004 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 219 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Management's Discussion and Analysis Year Ended June 30, 2004 As management of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), we offer readers of the Commission's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the Commission's financial activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. We encourage readers to consider the information on financial performance presented here in conjunction with the transmittal letter on pages i-x and the Commission's financial statements which begin on page 13. Financial Highlights • Total net assets of the Commission were $215,606,433 and consisted of invested capital assets, net of related debt, of $104,716,712; restricted net assets of $232,719,198; and unrestricted net asset (deficit) of ($121,829,477). • The unrestricted net asset (deficit) represents liabilities in excess of assets. This results primarily from the recording of the debt issued for Measure A highway, local street and road, and regional arterial projects for which title vests with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) or local jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Commission does not have sufficient current resources on hand to cover current and long-term liabilities; however, future Measure A sales taxes are pledged to cover Measure A debt service payments when made. • Net assets increased $72,594,229 during fiscal 2004. The increase was primarily attributable to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $35,615,226 attributable to the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) and regional arterials programs and a 14% increase in Measure A sales tax revenues. Subsequent to the renewal of Measure A in November 2002, the County of Riverside (County) and the 14 cities in the Western County established a transportation development fee to mitigate the congestion impacts of new development in Western Riverside County. The Commission will receive $400 million in TUMF funding for new CETAP corridors and regional arterial projects. • Total capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, were $130,157,718 at June 30, 2004, representing an increase of $1,800,394, or 1%, from June 30, 2003. The increase in capital assets was primarily related to the purchase of land for the Riverside Downtown commuter rail station parking expansion and the final completion of construction on the Pedley station platform extension, Pedley station closed-circuit television system (CCTV), North Corona Main station, La Sierra and West Corona station overcrossings, and La Sierra station carport structure. • The Commission's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $245,374,366, an increase of $52,184,203 compared to fiscal 2003. Approximately 63% of the governmental fund balances represent amounts available for the Measure A program, including debt service. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the Commission's basic financial statements, which are comprised of three components consisting of government -wide financial statements, fund financial statements, and notes to the financial statements. This report also contains required supplementary information and other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements. Government -wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the Commission's finances, in a manner similar to a private -sector business. The statement of net assets presents information on all of the Commission's assets and liabilities, with the difference between assets and liabilities reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in net assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the Commission is improving or deteriorating. The statement of activities presents information showing how the Commission's net assets changed during the fiscal year. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. The government -wide financial statements report the functions of the Commission that are principally supported by sales taxes and intergovernmental revenues, or governmental activities. The governmental activities of the Commission include general government, the Measure A program, CETAP, regional arterials, commuter rail, transit and specialized transportation services, planning and programming, and motorist services. Measure A program services are divided within the three regions of the County, namely Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. The government -wide financial statements include only the Commission, and its blended component unit. The government -wide financial statements can be found on pages 13-14 of this report. Fund Financial Statements A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. Fund accounting is used to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance - related legal requirements. All of the Commission's funds can be divided into two categories: governmental funds and fiduciary funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements; however, governmental fund financial statements focus on near -term inflows and outflows of spendable resources and on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financing requirements. Since the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. As a result, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near -term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and related statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The Commission maintains 11 individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the related statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances for the Commission's major governmental funds comprised of the General fund; Measure A Western County, Measure A Coachella Valley, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, and Local Transportation Fund Special Revenue funds; Measure A Western County Capital Projects fund; and Debt Service fund. Data from the other four governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements in the other supplementary information section. • • • 421 • • • The Commission adopts an annual appropriated budget for the General fund, all Special Revenue funds, and the Debt Service fund. Budgetary comparison schedules have been provided for the General fund and major Special Revenue funds as required supplementary information and for the nonmajor Special Revenue funds and the Debt Service fund as other supplementary information to demonstrate compliance with these budgets. The governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 15-18 of this report. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the Commission. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government -wide financial statements, as the resources of those funds are not available to the Commission to support the Commission's own programs. The fiduciary funds are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. The fiduciary fund financial statements can be found on page 19 of this report. Notes to the Financial Statements The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found on pages 20-36 of this report. Other Information Other information is in addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. This report also presents certain required supplementary information concerning the Commission's budgetary results for the General fund and major Special Revenue funds with appropriated budgets. Required supplementary information can be found on pages 37-38 of this report. The combining statements referred to earlier relating to nonmajor governmental funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information. Other supplementary information includes budgetary results for the nonmajor Special Revenue funds, Measure A Western County Capital Projects fund, and the Debt Service fund as well as schedules of expenditures for local streets and roads and for transit and specialized transportation by geographic area and source for all Special Revenue funds. This other supplementary information can be found on pages 39-46 of this report. Government -wide Financial Analysis As noted previously, net assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. At June 30, 2004, the Commission's assets exceeded liabilities by $215,606,433, a $72,594,229 increase from June 30, 2003. Our analysis below focuses on the net assets and changes in net assets of the Commission's governmental activities. Net Assets Approximately 49%, compared to 69% in 2003, of the Commission's net assets reflect its investment in capital assets (i.e., construction in progress; land and improvements; rail operating easement; rail stations; and office furniture, equipment, and automobiles), less any related debt used to acquire those assets, primarily related to rail, that is still outstanding. The Commission uses these capital assets to provide transportation and commuter rail transit services to the residents and business community of the County. The increase of $6,269,558 in net assets invested in capital assets, net of related debt, from governmental activities resulted primarily from the reduction in the related debt. The most significant portion of the Commission's net assets represents resources subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. Restricted net assets from governmental activities represented approximately 108% and 132% of the total net assets at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Restricted net assets from governmental activities increased $43,510,502 primarily as a result of the implementation of the TUMF program. 5 22 Unrestricted net assets represent the portion of net assets that can be used to finance day-to-day operations without constraints established by debt covenants, enabling legislation, or other legal requirements. Unrestricted net assets from governmental activities changed from a $144,643,646 deficit at June 30, 2003 to a $121,829,477 deficit at June 30, 2004. This deficit results primarily from the impact of recording of the Commission's long-term debt issued for Measure A highway, local street and road, and regional arterial projects. While a significant portion of the debt has been incurred to build these projects which are capital assets, upon completion these projects are transferred to Caltrans or the local jurisdiction. Accordingly, these projects are not assets of the Commission that offset the long- term debt in the statement of net assets. The following is condensed financial data related to net assets at June 30, 2004 and June 30, Net Assets June 30, 2004 2003: June 30, 2003 Current and other assets Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation Total assets Long-term obligations Other liabilities Total liabilities Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted Unrestricted Total net assets Changes in Net Assets $ 266,667,558 130,157,718 $ 210,514,553 128,357,324 396,825,276 157,088,200 24,130,643 181,218,843 338,871,877 177,769,681 18,089,992 195,859,673 104,716,712 232,719,198 (121,829,477) $ 215,606,433 98,447,154 189,208,696 (144,643,646) $ 143,012,204 The Commission's total program and general revenues were $257,116,803, while the total cost of all programs was $184,522,574. Total revenues increased by 24%, and the total cost of all programs increased by 9%. Approximately 35% of the costs of the Commission's programs was paid by those who directly benefited from the programs or by other governments that subsidized certain programs with grants and contributions. Sales taxes ultimately financed a significant portion of the programs' net costs. Governmental activities increased the Commission's net assets by $72,594,229, and condensed financial data related to the change in net assets is presented in the table below. Key elements of this increase are as follows: • Operating grants and contributions increased as a result of the implementation of the TUMF program and collection of related fees and increased federal and state reimbursements for major highway projects; • Capital grants and contributions decreased due to the completion of significant commuter rail capital projects in FY 2002/03; • Measure A sales tax revenues increased $14,782,295, or 14%, due to a strong local economy affected by increased population and jobs as well as available and affordable housing; • Investment earnings decreased 41% as a result of one of the lowest interest rate environments during the last 40 years; • Other miscellaneous revenue decreased as other funding for completed rail capital construction projects was earned in FY 2002/03; • Commuter rail expenses increased $1,476,882 during the year as a result of increased depreciation expense related to completed rail station construction projects and an increase in the Commission's Metrolink operating subsidy; • • • 6 23 • • • • Highway expenses increased $5,644,247 due primarily to increased Western County highway landscape management costs and Coachella Valley highway construction; • Local streets and roads expenses increased $5,085,940 as such payments to local jurisdictions are directly affected by the increase in sales taxes; • Regional arterial expenses increased $5,568,279 primarily as a result of a long-term contract with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments for reimbursement of completed regional arterial projects; • Transit and specialized transportation expenses decreased $4,025,061 due to significant reductions in Western County bus and commuter rail State Transit Assistance expenses offset by the implementation of the taxi demonstration program in Western County; and • Interest expense increased $1,354,339 primarily as a result of a probable arbitrage rebate liability based on an initial calculation. The arbitrage rebate liability was due to a significantly higher investment yield over bond yield and to a delay in the commencement of project construction caused by various federal and state agency issues and utility relocations. Changes in Net Assets Year Ended June 30, 2004 June 30, 2003 Revenues Program revenues: Charges for services $ 1,170,773 $ 1,561,265 Operating grants and contributions 61,412,882 7,673,857 Capital grants and contributions 1,183,922 22,781,709 General revenues: Measure A sales taxes 120,564,890 105,782,595 Transportation Development Act sales taxes 69,133,102 62,041,015 Unrestricted investment earnings 3,115,232 5,245,445 Other miscellaneous revenue 536,002 2,282,882 Total revenues 257,116,803 207,368,768 Expenses General government 3,909,942 4,945,108 Bicycles and pedestrians 927,138 1,072,776 CETAP 608,882 - Commuter assistance 2,959,732 2,318,033 Commuter rail 8,702,803 7,225,981 Highways 35,456,330 29,812,083 Local streets and roads 46,208,968 41,123,028 Motorist assistance 1,978,380 1,843,017 Planning and programming 4,287,696 4,583,124 Property management 338,353 154,582 Regional arterials 13,996,300 8,428,021 Transit and specialized transportation 53,411,921 57,436,982 Interest expense 11,736,129 10,381,790 Total expenses 184,522,574 169,324,525 Increase in net assets 72,594,229 38,044,243 Net assets at beginning of year 143,012,204 104,967,961 Net assets at end of year $ 215,606,433 $ 143,012,204 7 24 The following graph depicts program expenses and related program revenues for the Commission's governmental activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004: $60,000,000 $55,000,000 $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000, 000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- a- �aac ,PQ a6e ,a� a,5 Oz' acie _\ae eo` \5 °o ye came z5� G� \5�a ��6 r4 a�° •\Ka �c e� �e�`a °�a�� +�aa 0` \ 2 Qua aSQe as 5- ,aa ¢7 Expenditures ■ Revenues The graph below presents the program and general revenues by source for the Commission's governmental activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004: Other Charges for Unrestricted miscellaneous services investment revenue 0% earnings 0% Operating grants 1% and contributions 24% Transportation Development Act Capital grants sales taxes and contributions 27% 0% Measure A sales taxes 48% • • • 8 25 • • • Financial Analysis of the Commission's Funds As of June 30, 2004, the Commission's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $245,374,366, an increase of $52,184,203 compared to 2003. Approximately 2%, or $5,580,189, of this total amount constitutes unreserved fund balance which is available for spending at the Commission's discretion. Approximately 73% of the unreserved fund balance has been designated for bicycle and pedestrian projects and for motorist assistance. The remainder of the fund balance is reserved to indicate that it is not available for new spending because of the following commitments: $1,178,538 in Transportation Development Act funds that have been allocated to cities within the County for bicycle and pedestrian projects; • $17,240,284 for new CETAP corridors in Western County; • $9,810,774 for commuter assistance activities such as the ridesharing program, the park -and -ride program, and several other incentives for commuters to use alternative modes of transportation; • $23,511,038 for commuter rail projects including the Perris Valley Line extension which is expected to be completed in 2008; • $23,833,712 related to debt service that is to be paid over the next five years; • $51,461,164 for highway projects to be completed over the remainder of the initial Measure A; • $31,324,000 in advances to the State of California to ensure the timely commencement of a major interchange project managed by Caltrans; • $8,221,499 in loans receivable from cities for funds that were loaned to the cities to enable them to construct and maintain roads and to be repaid from their future Measure A local streets and roads funding; • $11,497,887 in accounts receivable from the State Board of Equalization for the FY 2003/04 Local Transportation Fund sales tax clean up allocation; • $193,900 for local streets and roads programs that are returned to the cities within the County for maintenance of their roads and local arterials; • $290,574 in the General fund that are available for planning and programming of the Local Transportation Fund program; • $6,325,870 in prepaid amounts for transit allocations and other expenditures; • $2,149,123 in property management funds that were generated from highway and rail properties that will be used for those programs; • $3,495,526 for regional arterials in the Coachella Valley and $17,199,663 for regional arterials in Western County; • $5,783,346 for specialized transportation projects funded through the end of Measure A which expires in 2009; and • $26,277,279 in Transportation Development Act funds available to the commuter rail and bus transit operators in the County. The following table presents the changes in fund balances for the governmental funds for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003: Year Ended June 30 Fund Balances General fund 2004 2003 % Change $ 7,352,174 $ 5,757,792 28% Special Revenue major funds: Measure A Western County 115,098,845 87,281,322 32% Measure A Coachella Valley 7,253,630 7,428,955 (2)% Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 34,439,947 N/A Local Transportation Fund 42,593,252 34,295,645 24% 9 26 Year Ended June 30 Fund Balances 2004 2003 % Change Measure A Western County Capital Projects fund 2,208,202 15,928,766 (86)% Debt Service fund 30,253,999 37,624,807 (20)% Nonmajor governmental funds 6,174,317 4,872,876 27% Key elements for the changes in fund balances are as follows: • The 28% increase in the General fund can be attributed to decreased activity for CETAP corridor studies; • The 32% increase in the Measure A Western County Special Revenue fund can be attributed to increased sales taxes and decreased activity in commuter rail as a result of the completion of construction at rail stations; • The 2% decrease in the Measure A Coachella Valley Special Revenue fund can be attributed to the use of existing reserves in the regional arterials program for ongoing and completed projects in the Coachella Valley; • The increase in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Special Revenue fund can be attributed to the implementation of the TUMF program in Western County; • The 86% decrease in the Measure A Western County Capital Projects fund can be attributed to the use of the bond proceeds to fund the ongoing work on the State Route (SR) 74 project; • The 20% decrease in the Debt Service fund can be attributed to a reduction in transfers from other funds for debt service payments; and • The 27% increase in the nonmajor governmental funds can be attributed to decreased claim activity in the State Transit Assistance Special Revenue fund. General Fund Budgetary Highlights Differences between the original budget and the final amended budget for the General fund resulted in a $902,547 increase in appropriations and were related to the following changes: • $116,601 in miscellaneous increases for various administration activities; • $204,500 in increases allocated to the commuter rail program for increased costs in security guards and utility costs at the Commission's commuter rail stations; • $541,014 in increases allocated to planning and programming services for encumbered and unbudgeted construction costs related to the Smart Call Box system and costs related to the CETAP studies; • $237,238 in increases allocated to property management activities related to securing support services to assist with a property inventory database, identifying unauthorized encroachments, and providing on -call advisory services related to appraisals and special projects; • $165,400 in decreases to intergovernmental distributions related to uses in other areas as needed by planning and programming services after intergovernmental distributions had been claimed by other governmental agencies; and • $26,647 in a decrease to depreciation expense which was erroneously included in the original budget. Budget increases were budgeted from available fund balance and new revenues. During the year, revenues exceeded budgetary estimates and expenditures were less than budgetary estimates, thus eliminating the need to draw upon existing fund balance. • • • 1027 • • • Capital Assets and Debt Administration Capital Assets As of June 30, 2004, the Commission had $130,157,718, net of accumulated depreciation, invested in a broad range of capital assets including construction in progress; land and land improvements; rail operating easements and stations; and office furniture, equipment, and automobiles. The total increase in the Commission's total capital assets, net for FY 2003/04 was 1%. The table below is a comparative summary of the Commission's capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation: Capital Assets, net of accumulated depreciation June 30, 2004 June 30, 2003 Land and land improvements Construction in progress Rail operating easements Rail stations Office furniture, equipment, and automobiles Total Major capital asset additions during 2004 included: $ 61,890,111 484,842 19,885,730 47,613,608 283,427 $ 130,157,718 $ 61,191,129 16,520,236 19,885,730 30,285,875 474,354 $ 128,357,324 • Purchase of land for the Riverside Downtown station parking expansion; and • Completion of North Main Corona station, La Sierra station parking expansion and solar energy -producing carport, and the Pedley station platform and CCTV. During 2004, the Commission sold four parcels of land totaling $2,322,583. More detailed information about the Commission's capital assets is presented in Note 4 to the financial statements. Debt Administration As of June 30, 2004, the Commission had $151,535,000 in outstanding sales tax revenue bonds compared to $177,352,519 at June 30, 2003. The Commission maintains an overall "AA" rating from Standard & Poor's and an "Aa2" rating from Moody's. The sales tax revenue bonds are among the highest rated transportation bonds in the nation. The current debt limitation for the Commission is $525,000,000, which is significantly in excess of the Commission's outstanding general obligation debt. Additional information on the Commission's long-term debt can be found in Note 6 to the financial statements. Economic Factors and Other Factors During its January Commission meeting, the Commission adopted guiding principles that were to be used in the preparation of the FY 2003/04 Budget. These principles have been incorporated in goals of the Commission and will be updated annually in response to the ever-changing social, political and economic environment. The principles are a business planning tool designed to assist the Commission in implementing its strategic goals and objectives and lays the foundation for future financial planning for the annual budget process. The Commission adopted the FY 2004/05 annual budget on June 9, 2004. This $178,266,200 balanced budget includes $10,806,800 for the completion of the North Main Corona station, preliminary engineering and initiation of right of way for the FTA New Starts Perris Valley Line and preliminary engineering of the Perris multimodal facility; $4,106,000 for preliminary engineering on the Mid -Valley Parkway; and $29,980,000 for the SR -60 high occupancy vehicle lanes and SR -74 design engineering and construction. 1128 Although the local economy along with the rest of the nation have felt the impact of the 2002 recession, leading economic indicators indicate that Riverside County will not contract, but will experience a slight increase from last year. Home sales, the building of new homes, the population growth, and the continued creation of new jobs in the area are reasons the County's economic indicators demonstrate a positive trend. Locally, job growth and taxable sales are forecasted to increase. These factors were considered in preparing the Commission's budget for the 2005 fiscal year. There are obvious variables in terms of project financing available from federal and state funds. While the federal transportation omnibus legislation and related funding commonly known as TEA21 expired in 2003, it has been extended through June 30, 2005 by Congress. Federal reauthorization for additional transportation funding in the future has not been approved and is not expected until after the November 2004 national elections. There is continuing uncertainty related to the fiscal condition of the State of California and the impact on transportation. In August 2004, the California Transportation Commission suspended the State Transportation Improvement Program funding until at least December 2004. This action affects several significant projects in Riverside County which may be delayed for an indeterminable period. Contacting the Commission's Management This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Commission's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances and to show the Commission's accountability for the money it receives. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional information should be addressed to the Chief Financial Officer, Finance Department at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, P.O. Box 12008, Riverside, California 92502-2208. • • • 1229 • • • Basic Financial Statements 30 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Statement of Net Assets June 30, 2004 Governmental Activities Assets Cash and investments $ 140,068,122 Receivables: Accounts 46,497,836 Advances to other governments 31,324,000 Loans 8,221,499 Interest 364,770 Due from other governments 8,031,253 Prepaid expenses 6,325,870 Restricted investments held by trustee 25,834,208 Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation 130,157,718 Total assets 396,825,276 Liabilities Accounts payable 21,141,664 Accrued interest 690,461 Other liabilities 151,528 Arbitrage liability 2,146,990 Long-term liabilities: Due within one year 28,379,481 Due in more than one year 128,708,719 Total liabilities 181,218,843 Net assets Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 104,716,712 Restricted for: Bicycles and pedestrians 1,684,710 CETAP 17,240,284 Commuter assistance 10,102,909 Commuter rail 23,548,417 Debt service 30,253,999 Highways 82,401,222 Local streets and roads 193,900 Planning and programming 290,932 Property management 2,149,123 Regional arterials 15,595,189 Transit and specialized transportation 49,258,513 Unrestricted (deficit) (121,829,477) Total net assets $ 215,606,433 See notes to financial statements Riverside County Transportation Commission Statement of Activities Year Ended June 30, 2004 Functions/Programs Expenses Primary Government Governmental Activities: General government $ Bicycles and pedestrians CETAP Commuter assistance Commuter rail Highways Local streets and roads Motorist assistance Planning and programming Property management Regional arterials Transit and specialized transportation 53,411,921 Interest expense 11,736,129 Total governmental activities $ 184,522,574 See notes to financial statements Charges for Services 3,909,942 $ 927,138 608,882 2,959,732 573,864 8,702,803 146,349 35,456,330 46,208,968 - 1,978,380 29,924 4,287,696 16,365 338,353 395,305 13,996,300 Program Revenues Operating Capital Grants Grants and and Contributions Contributions 8,966 $ - $ 17,807,613 1,161,405 177,553 17,811,805 2,325,663 1,422,165 17,807,613 2,899,065 $ 1,170,773 $ 61,412,882 $ 1,183,922 1,183,922 General Revenues: Measure A sales taxes Transportation Development Act sales taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Other miscellaneous revenue Total general revenues Change in net assets Net assets at beginning of year Net assets at end of year Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Assets Governmental Activites $ (3,900,976) (927,138) 17,198,731 (1,224,463) (7,194,979) (17,644,525) (46,208,968) 377,207 (2,849,166) 56,952 3,811,313 (50,512,856) (11,736,129) (120,754,997) 120,564,890 69,133,102 3,115,232 536,002 193,349,226 72,594,229 143,012,204 $ 215,606,433 1432 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission • Balance Sheet -Governmental Funds • June 30, 2004 Major Funds General Assets Cash and investments $ Receivables: Accounts Advances to other govemments Loans Interest Due from other funds Due from other governments Advances to other funds Prepaid expenditures Restricted investments held by trustee Total assets $ Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities: Accounts payable Due to other funds Advances from other funds Other liabilities Total liabilities Fund balances: Reserved for: Bicycles and pedestrians CETAP Commuter assistance Commuter rail Debt service Highways Loans and accounts receivable Local streets and roads Planning and programm ing Prepaid am ounts Property m anagem ent Regional arterials Transit and specialized transportation Unreserved: Designated for bicycles and pedestrians Designated for motorist assistance Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances $ See notes to financial statements Measure A Western County Special Revenue Measure A Coachella Valley Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Local Transportation Fund 8,153,212 $ 69,607,580 $ 4,323,187 $ 27,238,292 $ 25,322,320 $ 675,710 26,514,969 6,073,390 11,497,887 31,324,000 1,801,212 - 20,198 176,338 10,859 233,314 355,601 - 575,000 343,120 265,650 - 27 9,425,554 $ 130,620,350 $ 10,407,463 $ 35,337,953 $ 68,408 73,045 8,031,253 1,770,051 $ 14,749,055 $ 192,229 162,243 575,000 111,100 35,207 2,073,380 15,521,505 3,038,206 290,574 343,120 2,149,123 1,531,151 7,352,174 9,425,554 9,810,774 20,472,832 46,341,191 33,125,212 88,015 265,650 4,995,171 115,098,845 $ 130,620,350 $ 3,147,670 $ 5,463 700 3,153,833 2,911,771 58,158 3,495,526 788,175 7,253,630 10,407,463 $ 5,700,000 42,593,252 $ 889,470 $ $ 7,594 942 898,006 17,240,284 17,199,663 34,439,97 35,337,953 $ 1,178,538 Measure A Western County Capital Projects 1,336 2,206,866 2,208,202 $ 2,208,202 11,497,887 5,700,000 23,710,655 506,172 42,593,252 42,593,252 $ 2,208,202 2,208,202 $ Nonmajor Debt Governmental Service Funds Total - $ 202,036 $ 5,221,495 $ 140,068,122 1,735,880 46,497,836 - 31,324,000 6,420,287 - 8,221,499 4,361 10,225 364,770 - 588,915 - 8,031,253 - 575,000 - 17,100 6,325,870 23,627,315 - 25,834,208 30,253,999 $ 6,984,700 $ 267,831,473 $ 585,418 $ 21,141,664 221,386 588,915 575,000 3,579 151,528 810,383 22,457,107 1,178,538 17,240,284 9,810,774 23,511,038 23,833,712 23,833,712 51,461,164 6,420,287 - 51,043,386 47,727 193,900 290,574 17,100 6,325,870 2,149,123 20,695,189 2,566,624 32,060,625 506,172 3,542,866 3,542,866 1,531,151 30,253,99 6,174,317 245,37,366 30,253,999 $ 6,984,700 $ 267,831,473 33 Ri County Transportation Commission • Statement of Revenues, Expenditd Changes in Fund Balances -Governmental Funds • Year Ended June 4 Mjilts Revenues Sales taxes $ Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Intergovernmental Interest Vehicle registration user fees Other Total revenues Expenditures Current: Administration: Salaries and benefits General legal services Professional services Office lease Other Total administration Programs: Bicycles and pedestrians CETAP Comm uter assistance Comm uter rail Highways Local streets and roads Motorist assistance Planning and programming Property management Regional arterials Transit and specialized transportation Total programs Debt service: Principal Interest Total debt service Intergovernmental distributions Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year $ See notes to financial statements Measure A Western General County 10,306,968 $ 87,178,802 $ 1,625,006 20,730,996 43,464 780,386 696,238 1,886,725 12,671,676 110,576,909 1,092,648 78,644 779,912 282,823 536,934 2,770,961 4,900,437 1,881,902 338,353 205,759 7,326,451 25,495 4,361 29,856 750,183 7,614 10,885,065 1,786,611 (192,229) (192,229 1,594,382 5,757,792 7,352,174 $ 2,943,963 8,116,270 30,800,268 34,670,390 1,271,955 77,802,846 Special Revenue Measure A Coachella Valley 29,777,618 $ 33,140 1,430,048 31,240,806 2,333,480 10,424,566 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 35,615,226 83,106 Local Transportation Fund $ 58,421,527 $ Measure A Western County Capital Projects 180,741 551,908 35,698,332 58,602,268 551,908 608,882 8,246,797 649,503 3,022,381 24,027,224 77,802,846 24,027,224 32,774,063 7,213,582 14,464,701 (19,421,241 (4,956,540 (7,388,907) (7,388,907) 27,817,523 (175,325) 87,281,322 7,428,955 115,098,845 $ 7,253,630 $ 768,657 768,657 927,138 1,655,611 46,953,255 1,258,385 49,536,004 1,258,385 50,304,661 34,439,947 8,297,607 Debt Service $ -$ 1,381,475 (38,988) 1,342,48T 26,290,000 9,187,217 35,477,217 Nonmajor Governmental Funds Total 4,013,077 $ 189,697,992 35,615,226 920,532 23,276,534 61,012 3,115,232 1,435,098 1,435,098 2,698 3,976,721 6,432,417 257,116,803 51,742 3,911 27,211 14,354 27,121 124,339 1,114,012 1,978,380 1,958,571 5,050,963 1,293 221 1,514 386 35,477,217 5,177,202 551,908 (34,134,730) 1,255,215 (14,272,472) (14,272,472) 34,439,947 8,297,607 (13,720,564) 34,295,645 15,928,766 34,439,947 $ 42,593,252 $ 2,208,202 $ 26,763,922 26,763,922 (7,370,808) 37,624,807 30,253,999 $ 294,526 (248,300) 46,226 1,301,441 4,872,876 6,174,317 $ 1,144,390 82,555 807,123 297,177 1,332,712 3,663,957 927,138 608,882 2,943,963 13,016,707 33,133,748 46,208,968 1,978,380 3,537,513 338,353 8,896,300 53,411,921 165,001,873 26,316,788 9,191,799 35,508,587 750,183 8,000 204,932,600 52,184,203 41,523,149 (41,523,149) 52,184,203 193,190,163 245,374,366 35 Riverside County Transportation Commission Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets June 30, 2004 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net assets (page 13) are different because: Total fund balances —Governmental funds (page 15) Capital assets, less related accumulated depreciation, used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported in the funds. Interest payable on bonds outstanding is not due and payable in the current period and therefore is not reported in the funds. Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds. Those liabilities consist of: $ 245,374,366 130,157,718 (690,461) Compensated absences (370,118) Capital lease obligation (83,082) Contract payable (5,100,000) Arbitrage rebate liability (2,146,990) Bonds payable (151,535,000) Net adjustment (159,235,190) Net assets of governmental activities (page 13) $ 215,606,433 See notes to financial statements 1634 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Year Ended June 30, 2004 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities (page 14) are different because: Net change in fund balances —Total governmental funds (page 17) $ 52,184,203 Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However in the statement of activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. The adjustment combines the net changes of the following amounts: Capital outlay 6,334,982 Depreciation expense (2,212,005) Sale of capital assets (2,322,583) Net adjustments 1,800,394 The issuance of long-term debt (e.g., bonds) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets. The adjustment combines the net changes of the following amounts: Principal payments -sales tax revenue bonds 26,316,788 Accreted interest on bonds (472,481) Change in accrued interest 75,141 Regional arterial expense related to contract payable (5,100,000) Net adjustments 20,819,448 Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. The adjustment combines the net changes of the following amounts: Compensated absences (62,826) Arbitrage liability (2,146,990) Net adjustments (2,209,816) Change in net assets of governmental activities (page 14) $ 72,594,229 See notes to financial statements Riverside County Transportation Commission Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets June 30, 2004 Local Projects Agency Fund Assets Interest receivable $ 776 Restricted investments held by trustee 1,996,246 Total assets $ 1,997,022 Liabilities Due to other governments $ 1,997,022 See notes to financial statements 1937 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting entity: The Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) was formed in 1976 under Division 12 (commencing with Section 130000) of the California Public Utilities Code. The Commission is a special district governed by a 30 -member board of commissioners (Board) consisting of one representative from each city in the county, all five county supervisors, and a nonvoting state representative. The Commission provides short-range transportation planning and programming for Riverside County, which includes the administration of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance (STA) programs created under the Transportation Development Act (TDA) by the State of California (State). The LTF is administered by the Commission on behalf of the County of Riverside (County). The purpose of this program is to allocate funds for public transportation needs, local streets and roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and multimodal transportation terminals. The STA program allocates funds for public transportation purposes to those geographic areas with special public transportation needs, which cannot be met otherwise. On November 8, 1988, the Commission was empowered by the voters of the County, under Ordinance No. 88-1 (Measure A), to collect a one-half of one percent sales tax for the purpose of improving the transportation system of the County. Measure A was enacted, in part, pursuant to the provisions of Division 25 (commencing with Section 240000) of the California Public Utilities Code and Section 7252.22 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. On November 12, 2002 Riverside County's voters approved a 30 -year renewal of Measure A under Ordinance No. 02-001. The voter action ensures the replacement of the current Measure A program when it expires in 2009 with a new 30 year program that will continue funding improvements until March 2039. In connection with the new Measure A program, the County and cities in the Western County area implemented a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program to fund a regional arterial system to handle the traffic demands in the Western County area as a result of future development. Under the new Measure A program, the Commission shall receive the first $400 million of TUMF revenues to fund the regional arterial projects and new Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) corridors included in the new Measure A Transportation Improvement Plan. As a result of the commencement of the TUMF program prior to the new Measure A program, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Commission and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), administrator of the TUMF program, was executed regarding the allocation of TUMF revenues until the new Measure A program is effective in 2009. Under the MOU, the Commission is to receive 48.1 % of the TUMF revenues after a set -aside for WRCOG administration costs, and the balance is allocated to local arterial projects (48.1%) administered by WRCOG and public transit (3.8%). As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), the basic financial statements include all funds of the Commission including those of the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a component unit, for which the Commission is considered financially accountable. SAFE was created under Chapter 14 (commencing with Section 2550) of Division 3 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Sections 2421.5 and 9250.1 of the Vehicle Code. SAFE receives monies from fees levied on registered vehicles to be used to imple- ment and maintain an emergency motorist aid system, as specified, on portions of the California Freeway and Expressway System in the County. The governing body of SAFE is substantially identical to that of the Commission and is responsible for approval of SAFE's budget. SAFE is presented as a special revenue fund. Separate financial statements are not issued for SAFE. There are many other governmental agencies, including the County of Riverside, providing services within the area served by the Commission. These other governmental agencies have independently elected governing boards and consequently are not under the direction of the Commission. Financial information for these agencies is not included in the accompanying financial statements. 20 38 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued Basis of presentation: The Commission's basic financial statements consist of government -wide financial statements, including a statement of net assets and a statement of activities, and fund financial statements which provide a more detailed level of financial information. Government -wide statements: The statement of net assets and the statement of activities report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the Commission. For the most part, the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. These statements report governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues. The Commission does not have any business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on charges and fees for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the program expenses of a given function are offset by program revenues. Program expenses include direct expenses, which are clearly identifiable with a specific function, and allocated indirect expenses. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function. Taxes and other internally dedicated resources, which are properly not included among program revenues, are reported instead as general revenues. Fund financial statements: The fund financial statements provide information about the Commission's funds, includ- ing its fiduciary funds, though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. Separate finan- cial statements are provided for governmental and fiduciary funds. The emphasis of fund financial statements is on major governmental funds, each displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental funds are aggregated and reported as nonmajor funds. The Commission reports the following major governmental funds: General Fund: The General Fund is the general operating fund of the Commission and accounts for financial resources not required to be accounted for in another fund. Measure A Western County Special Revenue Fund: This fund accounts for the revenues from sales taxes, which are restricted to expenditures for Western County programs and activities. Measure A Coachella Valley Special Revenue Fund: This fund accounts for the revenues from sales taxes, which are restricted to expenditures for Coachella Valley programs and activities. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund: This special revenue fund accounts for TUMF revenues, which are restricted to expenditures for Western County regional arterial and CETAP projects. Local Transportation Fund: This special revenue fund accounts for the one -quarter percent of the state sales tax collected within the County under TDA for planning and programming, bicycle and pedestrian projects, and transit operations. In prior years, this fund was accounted for as a private -purpose trust fund; however, it was determined that some of the resources accumulated were available to the Commission for its commuter rail operations and, therefore, could be used to support the Commission's own programs. Accordingly, the Local Transportation Fund was classified from a fiduciary fund to a governmental fund in fiscal 2004. Measure A Western County Capital Projects Fund: This fund records bond proceeds from sales tax revenue bonds and use of these proceeds for Western County highway and commuter rail projects. 2139 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued Debt Service Fund: This fund accounts for the resources accumulated and payments made for principal and interest on the sales tax revenue bonds. Additionally, the Commission reports the following fund type: Local Projects Agency Fund: This fiduciary fund accounts for proceeds from a subordinate debt issue for var- ious cities' local street and road projects. Measurement focus and basis of accounting: The government -wide and the fiduciary fund financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the Commission considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 180 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred; however, principal and interest expenditures on long-term debt and compensated absences of governmental funds are recorded only when payment is due. Those revenues susceptible to accrual include sales taxes collected and held by the State at year-end on behalf of the Commission, TUMF, intergovernmental revenues, interest revenue, and vehicle registration user fees. In applying the susceptible -to -accrual concept to intergovernmental revenues, there are essentially two types of revenues. In one, moneys must be expended on the specific purpose or project before any amounts will be paid to the Commission; therefore, revenues are recognized based upon expenditures incurred. In the other, moneys are virtually unrestricted and are usually revocable only for failure to comply with prescribed compliance requirements. These resources are reflected as revenues at the time of receipt or earlier if the susceptible -to -accrual criteria are met. Cash and investments: The Commission maintains cash and investments in accordance with an investment policy adopted initially by the Board on September 13, 1995, and most recently amended March 10, 2004. The investment policy complies with, or is more restrictive than, applicable state statutes. Investments of bond proceeds as permitted by the applicable bond documents are maintained by U.S. Bank as custodial bank, and the earnings for each bond issue are accounted for separately. Cash from other Commission revenue sources is commingled for investment purposes, with investment earnings allocated to the different accounts based on average monthly dollar account balances. The Commission's investment policy authorizes investments in U.S. Treasury notes and bonds, federal agency notes, repurchase agreements, corporate bonds, commercial paper, banker's acceptances, money market mutual funds, the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund (RCPIF), the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), and certificates of deposit. Other investments permitted by the California Government Code (Code) are permitted but only with prior Board authorization, except for securities that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity that are ineligible. LAIF is regulated by Code Section 16429 and is under the management of the State Treasurer with oversight provided by the Local Agency Investment Advisory Board. Oversight of the RCPIF is Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued conducted by the County Treasury Oversight Committee. All investments, except for those related to bond reserve funds, are subject to a maximum maturity of five years unless specific direction to exceed the limit is given by the Board. Local Transportation Fund moneys are legally required to be deposited in the RCPIF. The RCPIF and the LAIF are carried at fair value based on the value of each participating dollar as provided by the RCPIF and LAIF, respectively. The fair value of the Commission's position in the RCPIF and LAIF is the same as the value of the pool shares. Investments in U.S. government and agency securities are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. Money market mutual funds are carried at fair value based on each fund's share price. Bank balances are secured by the pledging of a pool of eligible securities to collateralize the Commission's deposits with the bank in accordance with the Code. Accounts receivable: Accounts receivable consist primarily of Measure A and LTF sales tax revenues from the State Board of Equalization on all taxable sales within the County of Riverside, California through June 30, 2004. Interfund transactions: During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds involving goods provided or services rendered. There are also transfers of revenues from funds authorized to receive the revenue to funds authorized to expend it. Outstanding interfund balances are reported as due from/to other funds; internal financing balances are reported as advances to/from other funds. Restricted investments held by trustee: Restricted investments held by trustee represent unexpended bond proceeds, interest earnings thereon, and reserve amounts of sales tax revenue bonds. Under the related bond resolutions and indentures, any remaining bond proceeds are restricted for the use of future construction improvements to the respective projects, for debt service, or for reserve requirements in accordance with applicable debt covenants. Capital assets: Capital assets consisting of land and land improvements; construction in progress; rail station easements; rail stations; and office furniture, equipment, and vehicles are reported in governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the Commission as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $5,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of three years. Such assets are recorded at historical costs or estimated historical costs if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair value at the date of donation. Highway construction and certain purchases of right-of-way property, for which title vests with Caltrans, are included in highway program expenditures. Infrastructure consisting primarily of highway construction and right-of-way acquisition is not recorded as a capital asset because the Commission does not have title to such assets or rights - of -way. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend the life of the asset are not capitalized. Rail stations, furniture and equipment, and vehicles of the primary government are depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives: 2341 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued Asset Type Useful Life Rail stations 10 to 30 years Office furniture and equipment 3 to 5 years Vehicles 5 years Compensated absences: Vacation leave in governmental funds that is due and payable at year-end is reported as an expenditure and a liability of the General fund. Sick leave is recorded as an expenditure in the General fund when taken by the employee. Employees with continuous five years of service have the option of being paid for sick leave accumulated in excess of 240 hours at a rate of 50% (i.e., one hour's pay for every two hours in excess of 240). Any sick leave in excess of 240 hours is accrued at fiscal year end, and a liability is reported in the government -wide financial statements. Sick leave that is due and payable at year-end is reported as an expenditure and a fund liability of the General fund. Risk management: The Commission is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, or destruction of assets; and errors or omissions. The Commission protects itself against such losses by a balanced program of risk retention, risk transfers, and the purchase of commercial insurance. Loss exposures retained by the Commission are treated as normal expenditures and include any loss contingency not covered by the Commission's purchased insurance policies. Construction projects and rail properties are protected through a combination of commercial insurance, insurance required of Commission consultants, and a self-insurance fund established by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA). Settled claims have not exceeded insurance coverage in any of the past three fiscal years. Fund equity: In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report reservations of fund balance for amounts that are not available for appropriation or are legally restricted by outside parties for use for a specific purpose. Designations of fund balance represent tentative management plans and are subject to change. Net assets: In the government -wide financial statements, net assets represent the difference between assets and liabilities and are classified into three categories: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balances of any borrowings used for the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets and excludes unspent debt proceeds. Restricted net assets represent the net assets that are not accessible for general use because their use is sub- ject to restrictions enforceable by third parties. Unrestricted net assets represent those net assets that are available for general use. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the Commission's policy to use restricted resources first and then unrestricted resources, as they are needed. Administration expenditures: The Commission's staff and resources are used in the performance of its responsibilities relating to the activities of the Commission and its component unit. Accordingly, the Commission allocates salaries and benefits to each applicable fund on the basis of actual hours spent by activity, and other indirect overhead is allocated based on management's budgetary estimates. Administrative salaries and benefits of $865,272 allocated to Measure A were less than 1% of revenues as required by law. 2442 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued Classifications: As previously noted, in fiscal 2004 the Commission determined that the Local Transportation Fund should be classified as a governmental fund instead of a fiduciary fund because some of the assets in the fund could be used for the Commission's commuter rail program. As a result of this reclassification, the beginning balance of net assets for governmental activities in the statement of activities and of fund balance for the governmental funds in the fund financial statements increased $34,295,645. Implementation of new accounting principles: The Commission adopted Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 40, Deposit and Investment Risk Disclosures —an amendment of GASB Statement No. 3. This statement modifies disclosure requirements for deposits and investments to address common deposit and investment risks related to credit risk, concentration risk, interest rate risk, and foreign currency risk. Accordingly, certain footnote disclosures have been revised to conform to the provisions of GASB Statement No. 40. Additionally, the Commission adopted Statement No. 44, Economic Condition Reporting: The Statistical Section, which amends portions of previous guidance related to the preparation of a statistical section when presented as a required part of a comprehensive annual financial report. Note 2. Cash and Investments Cash and investments at June 30, 2004 consist of the following: Unrestricted Restricted Cash and investments in bank Petty cash RCPIF LAIF Investments with fiscal agents or custodians Total cash and investments $ Cash Investments Total Investments 57,293 $ 3,914,354 $ 3,971,647 $ 1,018 — 1,018 — 133,129,775 133,129,775 2,965,682 2,965,682 Total $ 3,971,647 1,018 133,129,775 2,965,682 27,830,454 27,830,454 $ 58,311 $140,009,811 $140,068,122 $ 27,830,454 $ 167,898,576 As of June 30, 2004, the Commission had the following investments: Investment RCPIF LAIF U. S. Treasury notes Federal Home Loan Association RCPIF Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association First American Treasury mutual fund Milestone mutual fund Total investments Maturities 314 days average 196 days average November 30, 2004 November 15, 2005 March 29, 2006 March 17, 2006 90 days average 90 days average Fair Value $131,137,605 2,965,682 15,792,598 1,987,500 1,992,170 1,926,854 9,985,701 2,052,155 $ 167,840,265 Custodial credit risk: Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in 2543 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 2. Cash and Investments, Continued the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker -dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The Commission's investment policy requires that a third party bank trust department hold all securities owned by the Commission. All trades are settled on a delivery versus payment basis through the Commission's safekeeping agent. The Commission has deposits with a bank balance of $375,000 with a financial institution; bank balances over $375,000 are swept daily into a money market account. Of the bank balance, $100,000 is federally insured and the balance is collateralized in accordance with the Code; however, the collateralized securities are not held in the name of the Commission. Interest rate risk: The Commission's investment policy follows the Code as it relates to limits on investment maturities as a means of managing exposure to fair value losses arising from increasing interest rates. Credit risk: As of June 30, 2004, the Commission's investment in the RCPIF was rated —MR1 by Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), AAA by Fitch Ratings (Fitch), and V+1 by Standard & Poor's (S&P). The investments in Federal Home Loan Association, Federal National Mortgage Association, First American Treasury mutual fund, and Milestone mutual fund were rated AAA by both Moody's and Fitch. LAIF is not rated. Concentration of credit risk: The Commission places a limit of 10% on the amount of investment holdings with any one non -governmental issuer. More than 5 percent of the Commission's investments are in the RCPIF, U.S. Treasury notes, and First American Treasury mutual fund. These investments are 78%, 9%, and 6%, respectively, of the Commission's investments. The investments in the Measure A Western County Capital Projects fund are unexpended bond proceeds invested in the First American Treasury mutual fund for project funds as required by the bond agreements. The investments in the Debt Service fund are sinking fund payments and reserve funds invested in First American Treasury and Milestone mutual funds and U.S. Treasury notes for interest and principal as required by the bond agreements. The investments in the Local Projects Agency Fund are unexpended bond proceeds invested in the First American Treasury mutual fund for project funds for various cities as required by the bond agreements. Note 3. Receivables Advances to other governments: On November 3, 2003, the Commission entered into a cooperative agreement with the State to provide for improvements to State highways within the County. Per the terms of this agreement, the Commission advanced the State $31,324,000 of Measure A funds in accordance with Assembly Bill 3090 and provided an additional $2,591,000 in Commission matching share requirements through Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality and Regional Surface Transportation Program funds to finance a portion of the total eligible improvement construction costs related to a major interchange project. The State has no responsibility to reimburse the Commission for the advance of $31,324,000 until such time an annual legislative appropriation occurs, a State Budget Authority exists to fund those eligible improvement reimbursements, the California Transportation Commission allocates funds to the improvements, and the Commission has satisfied any and all other necessary requirements. Based on information collected by the Commission regarding the State's fiscal condition, the Commission expects to receive reimbursement from the State in fiscal 2007. Loans: Under the Commission's financing guidelines for local jurisdictions, the Commission has entered into Advance Funding Agreements with a number of local cities. The cities have pledged their future share of Measure A local streets and roads revenues in accordance with repayment amounts specified in each city's agreement. All loans are due on or before June 30, 2009. Outstanding advances to all cities, reflected as loans receivables at June 30, 2004, are summarized below: Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 3. Receivables, Continued City of Canyon Lake City of Corona City of Lake Elsinore City of Norco City of Perris City of San Jacinto City of Temecula Total loans receivable Note 4. Capital Assets Capital assets activity for the year ended June 30, 2004 was as follows: Governmental activities Capital assets not being depreciated: Land and land improvements Construction in progress Rail operating easements Total capital assets not being depreciated Capital assets being depreciated: Rail stations Office furniture, equipment and automobiles Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Rail stations Office furniture, equipment and automobiles Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net Governmental activities capital assets, net Beginning Balance $ 734,538 2,308,081 173,525 1,020,275 923,620 631,750 2,429,710 $ 8,221,499 Additions/ Retirements/ Ending Transfers Transfers Balance $ 61,191,129 $ 16,520,236 19,885,730 3,021,565 $ (2,322,583) $ 61,890,111 321,268 (16,356,662) 484,842 — 19,885,730 3,342,833 (18,679,245) 82,260,683 97,597,095 40,876,409 681,562 41,557,971 19,340,811 8,000 19,348,811 — 60,217,220 689,562 — 60,906,782 (10,590,534) (2,013,078) (207,208) (198,927) (10,797,742) (2,212,005) 30,760,229 17,136,806 $128,357,324 $ 20,479,639 $ (18,679,245) $ 130,157,718 — (12,603,612) — (406,135) — (13,009,747) — 47,897,035 Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the Commission's governmental activities during the year ended June 30, 2004 as follows: General government Commuter rail Commuter assistance Total depreciation expense Note 5. Interfund Transactions $ 183,158 2,013,078 15,769 $ 2,212,005 Due from/to Other Funds: The composition of balances related to due from other funds and due to other funds at June 30, 2004 is as follows: 2745 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 5. Interfund Transactions, Continued Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount Explanation General fund Measure A Western County $ Special Revenue fund General fund Measure A Coachella Valley Special Revenue fund General fund TUMF Special Revenue fund General fund Nonmajor Governmental funds Measure A Western County General fund 192,229 Reimbursement to Measure A for Special Revenue fund various rail projects Measure A Western County Nonmajor Governmental 163,372 Reimbursement to Measure A for Special Revenue fund fund various rail projects 162,243 Reimbursement for fringe benefits 5,463 Reimbursement for fringe benefits 7,594 Reimbursement for fringe benefits 58,014 Reimbursement for fringe benefits Total due from/to other funds $ 588,915 Advances to/from Other Funds: In March 2004, the Measure A Western County Special Revenue fund's commuter assistance program advanced $275,000 to the Measure A Western County Special Revenue fund's highway program to fund a local match for a highway project. The advance is payable on July 1, 2009. In April 2003, the Measure A Western County Special Revenue fund's highway program advanced $300,000 to the Measure A Western County local streets and roads program to fund repairs and improvements to a local road. The advance is payable on July 1, 2006. Interfund Transfers: During 2004, interfund transfers were as follows: Transfers Out General fund Measure A Western County Special Revenue fund Transfers In Measure A Western County $ Special Revenue Fund Debt Service fund Measure A Western County Nonmajor Governmental fund Special Revenue fund Measure A Coachella Valley Debt Service fund Special Revenue fund Measure A Western County Measure A Western County Capital Projects fund Special Revenue fund Nonmajor Governmental fund Nonmajor Governmental fund Total transfers Amount 192,229 Explanation Reimbursement of LTF funded rail projects 19,375,015 Debt service related to highways and commuter rail for Western County 46,226 Matching contribution for freeway service patrol operations 7,388,907 Debt service related to highways and regional arterials for Coachella Valley 14,272,472 Reimbursements for State Route 74 project costs 248,300 Call box program augmentation of freeway service patrol operations $ 41,523,149 2846 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 6. Long-term Obligations The following is a summary of the changes in long-term obligations for the year ended June 30, 2004: Bonds payable Capital lease obligation Contract payable Compensated absences Total long-term obligations Balance July 1, 2003 $ 177,352,519 $ 109,870 307,292 $ 177,769,681 $ Additions/ Balance Accretion Reductions June 30, 2004 472,481 $ (26,290,000) $151,535,000 (26,788) 83,082 6,100,000 (1,000,000) 5,100,000 255,463 (192,637) 370,118 6,827,944 $ (27,509,425) $157,088,200 Due Within One Year $ 27,200,000 28,073 1,000,000 151,408 $ 28,379,481 Bonds payable: Under the provisions of Measure A, as amended by Ordinance No. 92-1 (Measure AA), the Commission has the authority to issue bonds subject to a bond debt limitation of $525,000,000. The following is a summary of bonds issued and secured by Measure A revenues: 2000 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A: In July 2000, the Commission issued serial bonds in the principal amount of $35,825,000 to fund various major highway projects. Net proceeds amounted to $35,934,149, inclusive of premium of $109,148 and net of accrued interest. The bonds mature in annual installments of $2,975,000 to $4,785,000 on various dates through June 1, 2009 with interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 5.25%. The Commission posted a surety bond in lieu of cash reserve in the amount of $3,582,500. 1997 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A: In August 1997, the Commission issued serial bonds in the principal amount of $47,910,000 to retire outstanding commercial paper notes of $41,200,000 and to fund various major highway projects. Net proceeds amounted to $48,055,659, inclusive of premium of $263,196 and net of accrued interest. The bonds mature in annual installments of $2,490,000 to $5,115,000 on various dates through June 1, 2009 with interest rates ranging from 3.7% to 5.25%. The Commission posted a surety bond in lieu of cash reserve in the amount of $4,791,000. Portions of the bonds are subject to early redemption, at the option of the Commission beginning June 1, 2007. 1997 Junior Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series B: In August 1997, the Commission issued subordinated serial bonds in the principal amount of $13,245,000 to retire outstanding commercial paper notes of $2,800,000 and to fund various local streets and roads projects. Net proceeds amounted to $13,223,717, inclusive of premium of $11,016 and net of accrued interest. The bonds mature in annual installments of $745,000 to $1,405,000 on various dates through June 1, 2009 with interest rates ranging from 3.75% to 5.0%. The Commission posted a surety bond in lieu of cash reserve in the amount of $1,324,500. Portions of the bonds are subject to early redemption, at the option of the Commission beginning June 1, 2007. 1996 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A: In January 1996, the Commission issued serial bonds in the principal amount of $61,765,000 to refund a portion of the 1991 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A. Net proceeds amounted to $66,252,576, inclusive of premium of $4,487,576 and net of accrued interest. The bonds mature in annual installments of $45,000 to $10,030,000 on various dates through June 1, 2009 with interest rates ranging from 3.75% to 6.0%. The required reserve amount is $4,485,000. The proceeds from the refunding bonds and a forward float contract provided by a major bank were placed in an irrevocable escrow fund consisting of United States Treasury obligations. At June 30, 2004, there were no refunded sales tax bonds outstanding. 2947 $ Amount Outstanding • 21,835,000 III 23,335,500 6,394,500 44,805,000 • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 6. Long-term Obligations, Continued 1993 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A: In January 1993, the Commission issued serial bonds in the principal amount of $136,610,000 to finance certain highway and rail projects and Coachella Valley regional arterial projects. Net proceeds after original discount amounted to $135,448,305. The bonds mature in annual installments and require sinking fund payments of $5,910,000 to $12,295,000 on various dates through June 1, 2009 with interest rates ranging from 4.625% to 6.0%. The required reserve amount is $14,150,796. Total bonds payable Annual debt service requirements to maturity for bonds payable are as follows: Years Ending June 30 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total debt service Principal Amount Outstanding 55,165,000 $ 151,535,000 Interest Total $ 27,200,000 28,640,000 30,200,000 31,865,000 33,630,000 $ 151,535,000 $ 25,855,173 $ 177,390,173 $ 8,285,530 6,843,220 5,274,945 3,608,120 1,843,358 $ 35,485,530 35,483,220 35,474,945 35,473,120 35,473,358 Commercial paper notes payable: The Commission has authorized the issuance of commercial paper notes in an amount not to exceed $100,000,000 for the primary purpose of financing costs of certain highway and commuter rail projects. As of June 30, 2004, the Commission had no outstanding commercial paper notes. Capital lease obligation: The Commission has entered into a lease agreement for financing the acquisition of office equipment. This lease agreement qualifies as a capital lease for accounting purposes and, therefore, has been recorded at the present value of its future minimum lease payments. The office equipment value of $139,243 is recorded as a capital asset in the governmental activities. Total future minimum lease obligations and the net present value of these minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2004 are as follows: Years Ending June 30 2005 2006 2007 Total minimum lease payments Less amount representing interest Present value of minimum lease payments Total $ 31,371 31,371 26,142 88,884 (5,802) $ 83,082 Contract payable: In December 2003, the Commission entered into an agreement with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and the city of Rancho Mirage to reimburse CVAG $6,100,000 from Measure A Coachella Valley highway moneys for costs paid to the city of Rancho Mirage related to a completed state highway project. Under the agreement, the Commission will pay CVAG over a six -year period. As of June 30, 2004, the annual contract payments are as follows: Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 6. Long-term Obligations, Continued Years Ending June 30 Total 2005 $ 1,000,000 2006 1,000,000 2007 1,000,000 2008 1,000,000 2009 1,100, 000 Total contract payments $ 5,100,000 Arbitrage Rebate: The Tax Reform Act of 1986 instituted certain arbitrage restrictions with respect to the issuance of tax-exempt bonds after August 31, 1986. In general, arbitrage regulations deal with the investment of all tax- exempt bond proceeds at an interest yield greater than the interest yield paid to bondholders. Failure to follow the arbitrage regulations could result in all interest paid to bondholders retroactively rendered taxable. In accordance with the arbitrage regulations, if excess earnings were calculated, 90% of the amount calculated would be due to the Internal Revenue Service at the end of each five-year period. The remaining 10% would be recorded as a liability and paid after all bonds had been redeemed. During the current year, the Commission performed calculations of excess investment earnings on various bond financings. A liability of $2,146,990 resulted from one of the calculations for the various issues. Note 7. Reserved and Designated Fund Balances Measure A: Measure A sales tax revenues are allocated to the three defined geographic areas of Riverside County, consisting of Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley in proportion to the funds generated within those areas. Revenues must then be allocated to the programs of the geographic areas according to percentages as defined by Measure A and are legally restricted for applicable program expenditures. Bond proceeds are allocated to the geographic areas based on the estimated uses. Accordingly, the related fund balances are reserved as follows: Highways, commuter rail, and accounts and loans receivable: Funds for state highways are to be used for project costs including engineering, right-of-way acquisitions, and construction. Such funds are intended to supplement existing federal and state resources. Commuter rail projects anticipate the use of existing rail lines, and funds are used for costs related to planning, capital improvements, right-of-way purchase, and/or use rights agreements. Amounts advanced to the State and to certain cities under funding agreements are reflected in fund balance as reserved for advances to other governments and loans receivable, respectively. Debt service: Certain bond proceeds have been used to make required sinking fund payments in the Debt Service fund as required by the bond agreements. Amounts held by the trustee equal to the maximum annual debt service are recorded in the Debt Service fund. Local streets and roads: Funds are expended by local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. The County and local cities are required to supplement those expenditures with other previously dedicated revenue sources to maintain road improvements. Monies are disbursed to the jurisdictions which comply with the requirement to maintain the same level of funding for streets and roads as existed just prior to the passage of Measure A and which annually submit a five-year capital improvement plan. Regional arterials: Funds for regional arterials are used to implement the planned regional arterial system, as defined by CVAG, in the Coachella Valley. Funds are matched by Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee revenues generated in the Coachella Valley. 3149 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 7. Reserved and Designated Fund Balances, Continued Commuter assistance and specialized transportation: Funds for specialized transportation are used to promote and subsidize commuter assistance programs such as ridesharing and telecommuting and to guarantee reduced transit fares, expand existing transit services, and implement new transit services for seniors and persons with disabilities. Additionally, CVAG has elected to use a portion of the Coachella Valley local streets and roads funds to provide additional funding for bus replacement or other transit programs that will improve air quality. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee: TUMF revenues of $400 million to be received by the Commission are to be used for new CETAP corridors and the regional arterial system in Western County and are reserved as follows: CETAP: Funds for the development of new transportation corridors are used to provide congestion relief and mobility within the County and between the County and its neighboring Orange and San Bernardino counties. Funds will be matched by revenues of $370 million generated from the new Measure A approved in 2002 that becomes effective in 2009. Regional arterials: Funds for regional arterials are used to implement the planned regional arterial system, as defined in the new Measure A, in the Western County. Funds will be matched by revenues of $300 million generated from the new Measure A. Transportation Development Act: Reserves for the Local Transportation Fund represent the unclaimed apportionments related to claims for transit programs, the unexpired allocations available for bicycle and pedestrian projects, prepaid transit allocations, and earned but not received revenues. Expired allocations of $506,172 related to bicycle and pedestrian projects are unreserved and designated. Reserves for the State Transit Assistance represent the unclaimed apportionments related to claims for transit. The TDA reserves at June 30, 2004 are as follows: • Local Transportation State Transit Fund Assistance Total Accounts receivable $ 11,497,887 $ — $ 11,497,887 Prepaid amounts $ 5,700,000 $ $ 5,700,000 Bicycle and pedestrian projects $ 1,178,538 $ $ 1,178,538 Western County: Bus transit: City of Banning $ 161,442 $ 14,687 $ 176,129 City of Beaumont 140,320 1,293 141,613 City of Corona 77,000 2,896 79,896 City of Riverside — 4,068 4,068 Riverside Transit Agency 3,525,197 521,770 4,046,967 Apportioned and unallocated 3,794,531 717,996 4,512,527 Commuter rail: Riverside County Transportation Commission 250,000 — 250,000 Apportioned and unallocated 10,067,152 575,446 10,642,598 Total Western County 18,015,642 1,838,156 19,853,798 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 7. Reserved and Designated Fund Balances, Continued Local Transportation State Transit Fund Assistance Total Coachella Valley: SunLine Transit Agency — 528,307 528,307 Apportioned and unallocated 143,558 156,865 300,423 Total Coachella Valley 143,558 685,172 828,730 Palo Verde Valley: Bus Transit: Transit 61,122 — 61,122 Apportioned and unallocated — 43,296 43,296 Total Palo Verde Valley 61,122 43,296 104,418 Unapportioned carryover 5,490,333 — 5,490,333 Total transit and specialized transportation $ 23,710,655 $ 2,566,624 $ 26,277,279 Commuter rail: Reserves represent TDA monies in the General fund to be used for commuter rail operations. Planning and programming: Reserves represent TDA monies in the General fund to be used for planning and programming services. Property management: Reserves represent highway and rail lease monies to be used for the management of Commission properties. Prepaid amounts: Reserves represent amounts related to prepaid expenditures that are not available for appropriation. Motorist assistance: The Commission has designated unexpended funds in the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies and Freeway Service Patrol Special Revenue funds to assist motorists on County roads. Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies Operating lease: The Commission has entered into an operating lease agreement for office facilities. The term of the lease is for a period of ten years expiring on October 30, 2012 and may be extended for two additional five-year terms. Rental expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 were $296,989. The total minimum rental commitment at June 30, 2004 is due as follows: Year Ending June 30 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010-2013 Total minimum rental commitment Amount $ 302,038 307,172 312,394 317,708 323,106 946,005 $ 2,508,423 3351 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies, Continued Forward delivery agreement: The Commission has entered into a forward delivery agreement with a German bank, which requires the bank to deliver and the Commission to purchase U.S. Treasury obligations beginning in 2001 and maturing in 2009. The payments will be made from the Commission's cash or securities held in the 1993 and 1996 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Debt Service fund. The purpose for this agreement is to assure the Commission that the Debt Reserve fund's yield is no less than the required bond yield. Agreements to acquire real property: Measure A has entered into other agreements in the ordinary course of business with companies and other governmental agencies for the acquisition of real property and equipment as well as the engineering and construction of certain highway and commuter rail projects. Litigation: Certain claims involving disputed construction costs have arisen in the ordinary course of business. Additionally, the Commission is a defendant in lawsuits. Although the outcome of these matters is not presently determinable, management does not expect that the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse impact on the financial condition of the Commission. Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund: The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the Sunline Transit Agency (STA), (collectively, the Agencies), major transit providers for the County of Riverside, obtained available lease financing for bus acquisitions through the proceeds from certificates of participation issued by the California Transit Finance Corporation (Corporation) for each agency. Local Transportation Funds and State Transit Assistance Funds, to the extent of the Agencies' eligible share, along with other federal and state funds were pledged as support for the Agencies' lease payments to the Corporation. For the year ended June 30, 2004, there was no Local Transportation Fund revenue expended for lease payments; however, State Transit Assistance Fund revenue of $320,000 and $100,200 were expended for lease payments by RTA and STA, respectively. Note 9. Joint Venture The Commission is one of five members of the SCRRA, a joint powers authority created in June 1992. The SCRRA's board consists of one member from the Ventura County Transportation Commission; two each from the Orange County Transportation Authority, the San Bernardino Associated Governments, and the Commission; and four members from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The SCRRA is responsible for implementing and operating a regional commuter rail system (Metrolink) in five southern California counties. As a member of SCRRA, the Commission makes capital and operating contributions for its pro rata share of rail lines servicing the County. The Commission expended $3,172,294 during 2004 for its share of Metrolink capital and operating costs. As of June 30, 2004, cumulative capital contributions were $25,715,943. Other funds for rail service are contributed to the SCRRA by the State from state rail bonds on behalf of the Commission. Separate financial statements are prepared by and available from the SCRRA, which is located at 700 N. Flower Street, 26th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017. Note 10. Employees' Pension Plans Public Employees' Retirement System Plan description and funding policy: The Commission contributes to the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) of the State of California (System), an agent multiple -employer public employee retirement system that acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities in the State. Copies of PERS' 34 52 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 10. Employees' Pension Plans, Continued annual financial report may be obtained from its executive office located at 400 P Street, Sacramento, California 95814. All permanent Commission employees are eligible to participate in the System. Employees attaining the age of 55 with five years of credited California service (service) are eligible for normal retirement and are entitled to a monthly benefit of 2.7% of their final compensation for each year of service. Final compensation is defined as the highest annual salary earned. Retirement may begin at age 50 with a reduced benefit rate. The Commission's PERS plan also provides death and retirement disability benefits. The plan also credits employees for unused sick leave. Upon separation from the plan prior to retirement, members' accumulated contributions are refundable with interest credited through the date of separation. The Commission pays the employees' required contribution of 8% of regular earnings. New employees hired after November 28, 2002 are responsible for 1% of the 8% required contribution. The Commission is required to contribute the remaining amounts necessary to fund the benefits of its members, using the actuarially determined rate, which was 14.472% in 2004. Annual pension cost: For 2004 the Commission's annual pension cost of $407,677 was equal to the Commission's required and actual contributions. The required contribution was determined as a part of the June 30, 2003 actuarial valuation using the entry age normal actuarial cost method. The actuarial assumptions included (a) 8.25% investment rate of return, (b) projected annual salary increases that vary by duration of service, (c) the total inflation in future years at an assumed rate of 3.5%, (d) an assumption of a 3.75% across the board cost -of -living adjustment, and (e) merit increases that vary by length of service. The actuarial value of the PERS assets was determined using techniques that smooth the effects of short-term volatility in the market value of investments over a three-year period (smoothed market value). The PERS unfunded actuarial accrued liability is being amortized as a level percentage of payroll method over a closed 30 -year period. Three-year trend information for PERS: Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2004 2003 2002 Required supplementary information: Actuarial Valuation Date June 30, 2002 June 30, 2001 June 30, 2000 Annual Pension Percentage of Net Pension Cost (APC) APC Contributed Obligation $ 407,677 100% $ 178,873 100% 89,076 100% (B) Entry Age (C) (A) Actuarial Excess of Actuarial Accrued Assets Asset Liability Over AAL Value (AAL) (A) -(B) $ 4,750,376 $ 5,536,620 $ (786,244) 4,861,370 4,910,828 (49,458) 4,601,892 3,753,057 848,835 (D) Funded Ratio (A)/(B) 85.8% 99.0 122.6 (F) Excess Percentage (E) of Covered Covered Payroll Payroll (C)/(E) $ 1,634,320 (48.1)% 1,645,655 (3.0) 1,481,195 57.3 3553 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2004 Note 10. Employees' Pension Plans, Continued 401(a) plan: The Commission offers its employees a 401(a) defined contribution plan referred to as the Money Purchase Plan & Trust (Plan), which covers all permanent full-time employees. Employees are fully vested in the Plan after five years. The Plan, which is administered by the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), requires the Commission to make a contribution of 7.5% of the employees' earnings for the Plan year. Fiduciary responsibility and reporting of the Plan assets rests with ICMA. The Commission has the authority to amend the contribution requirements. Total payroll for covered employees for the current year was approximately $1,511,700. The Commission's contributions to the Plan were approximately $75,400 for the year ended June 30, 2004. Note 11. Postretirement Health Care Per Resolution of the Board, the Commission provides postretirement health benefits for eligible retirees and their dependents at retirement. For employees hired prior to July 12, 2000, retirees must have no less than five years of System service. For employees hired on or after July 12, 2000, retirees must have a total of 10 years of System service and no less than five years of Commission service. Currently, five retirees meet these eligibility requirements and are receiving benefits. The Commission contributes $551 per month toward premiums for retiree health insurance that is coordinated with Medicare and other benefits provided by federal and state law, when available, to the extent it reduces the cost of insurance premiums. Expenditures for post -retirement health care benefits are funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. Expenditures of $31,428 were incurred for post -retirement health care costs for the year ended June 30, 2004. The GASB recently issued Statement No. 45 to address the accounting and disclosure treatment for this type of plan. Effective with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, the Commission will be required to recognize post -retirement health care costs on an accrual basis over a period approximating the employees' years of service and to provide information about actuarial accrued liabilities associated with these benefits and whether and to what extent progress is being made in funding the plan. Note 12. Measure A Conformance Requirements Measure A requires that the sales taxes collected may only be used for transportation purposes including administration and the construction, capital acquisition, maintenance, and operation of streets, roads, highways including state highways, and public transit systems and for related purposes. These purposes include expenditures for planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related right-of-way acquisition. Note 13. Pronouncements Issued, Not Yet Effective The GASB has issued several pronouncements prior to June 30, 2004 that have effective dates that may impact future financial presentations. Management has not currently determined what, if any, impact implementation of the following statements may have on the financial statements of the Commission. • GASB Statement No. 42, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Impairment of Capital Assets and Insurance Recoveries. • GASB Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. • This page intentionally left blank. • • 55 • • • Required Supplementary Information 56 • Riverside County Transportation Commission • ScheduleSvenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance- 411 Budget and Actual -General and Major Special Revenue Funds • Year Ended June 30, 2004 Special Revenue General Measure A Western County Measure A Coachella Valley Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Variance with Variance with Variance with Variance with Final Budget Final Budget Final Budget Final Budget Original Final Positive Original Final Positive Original Final Positive Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Revenues Sales taxes $ 9,655,400 $ 9,655,400 $ 10,306,968 $ 651,568 $ 70,751,000 $ 70,751,000 $ 87,178,802 $ 16,427,802 $ 26,040,000 $ 26,040,000 $ 29,777,618 $ 3,737,618 $ $ - $ - $ - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee - - - - - 35,615,226 35,615,226 Intergovernmental 840,404 840,404 1,625,006 784,602 23,763,900 23,763,900 20,730,996 (3,032,904) - - - Interest 54,517 54,517 43,464 (11,053) 465,400 501,900 780,386 278,486 25,200 25,200 33,140 7,940 - 83,106 83,106 Other 459,430 463,052 696,238 233,186 1,757,800 1,757,800 1,886,725 128,925 1,430,000 1,430,000 1,430,048 48 - - Total revenues 11,009,751 11,013,373 12,671,676 1,658,303 96,738,100 96,774,600 110,576,909 13,802,309 27,495,200 27,495,200 31,240,806 3,745,606 - 35,698,332 35,698,332 Expenditures Current: Adm inistration: Salaries and benefits 1,076,661 1,161,474 1,092,648 68,826 General legal services 116,109 113,254 78,644 34,610 Professional services 935,049 994,340 779,912 214,428 Office lease 287,414 287,414 282,823 4,591 Other 904,027 879,379 536,934 342,445 Total administration 3,319,260 3,435,861 2,770,961 664,900 Programs: CETAP - - - - 1,501,500 608,882 892,618 Commuter assistance - - - 3,656,700 3,656,700 2,943,963 712,737 Commuter rat 4,707,600 4,912,100 4,900,437 11,663 7,269,900 11,127,059 8,116,270 3,010,789 - - - - Co Highw ays - 38,719,300 39,037,360 30,800,268 8,237,092 2,788,100 2,788,100 2,333,480 454,620 Local streets and roads - - - 26,827,600 34,669,305 34,670,390 (1,085) 9,114,000 10,422,949 10,424,566 (1,617) Planning and programming 1,384,300 1,925,314 1,881,902 43,412 - - Property management 215,000 452,238 338,353 113,885 - - - - Regionalarterials - - - - - - 7,135,700 8,115,700 8,246,797 (131,097) 1,501,500 649,503 851,997 Transit and specialized transportation 217,100 217,100 205,759 11,341 1,943,900 1,943,900 1,271,955 671,945 2,604,000 3,022,381 3,022,381 Total programs 6,524,000 7,506,752 7,326,451 180,301 78,417,400 90,434,324 77,802,846 12,631,478 21,641,800 24,349,130 24,027,224 321,906 3,003,000 1,258,385 1,744,615 Debt service: Principal - - 25,495 (25,495) Interest 4,759 4,361 (4,361) Total debt service 4,759 29,856 (29,856) Intergovernmental distributions 915,600 750,200 750,183 17 - Capital outlay 33,310 33,310 7,614 25,696 385,000 385,000 385,000 Depreciation 26,647 Total expenditures 10,823,576 11,726,123 10,885,065 841,058 78,802,400 90,819,324 77,802,846 13,016,478 21,641,800 24,349,130 24,027,224 321,906 - 3,003,000 1,258,385 1,744,615 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 186,175 (712,750) 1,786,611 2,499,361 17,935,700 5,955,276 32,774,063 26,818,787 5,853,400 3,146,070 7,213,582 4,067,512 - (3,003,000) 34,439,947 37,442,947 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - - - • 10,937,100 10,900,600 14,464,701 3,564,101 - Transfers out (36,500) - (192,229) (192,229) (27,580,100) (27,580,100) (19,421,241) 8,158,859 (7,898,000) (7,898,000) (7,388,907) 509,093 - Total other financing sources (uses) (36,500) - (192,229) (192,229) (16,643,000) (16,679,500) (4,956,540) 11,722,960 (7,898,000) (7,898,000) (7,388,907) 509,093 - Netchangeinfund balance $ 149,675 $ (712,750) 1,594,382 $ 2,307,132 $1,292,700 $(10,724,224) 27,817,523 $ 38,541,747 $ (2,044,600) $ (4,751,930) (175,325) $ 4,576,605 $ - $ (3,003,000) 34,439,947 $ 37,442,947 Fund balances at beginning of year 5,757,792 87,281,322 7,428,955 Fund balances at end of year $ 7,352,174 $115,098,845 $ 7,253,630 $34,439,947 See notes to required supplementary information 57 Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Required Supplementary Information June 30, 2004 Budgetary Data In February of each year, department heads begin the process of compiling budget data for the upcoming fiscal year. Budget numbers along with supporting documentation are provided to the Chief Financial Officer by March 15. That budget data is compiled and presented to the Executive Director for review and approval and is submitted to the Budget and Implementation Committee at its April meeting. After review by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the proposed budget is scheduled for preliminary review and comment as well as public hearing at the Commission's May meeting. The final budget for the new fiscal year is then adopted by motion of the Board of Commissioners (Board) no later than June 15 of the current year. This appropriated budget covers substantially all Commission expenditures by financial responsibility unit (i.e., General and Measure A special revenue) by fund, except for the Local Transportation Fund, as a budget is not legally required for this fund. The Measure A Special Revenue funds for the three county areas (Western, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley) are adopted as a single budget. All appropriated amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by the Commission. Unexpended appropriations lapse at year-end. All budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. • • As adopted by the Board, expenditure activities of the funds with adopted budgets are controlled at the budgetary unit, which is the financial responsibility level, for each function (i.e., administration, programs, intergovernmental distributions, and capital outlay). These functions provide the legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount). Management has the discretion to transfer the budgeted amounts within the financial responsibility unit according to function. Supplemental budget appropriations were necessary during the year. • • Other Supplementary Information 59 Riverside County Transportation Commission • Special Revenue Funds Nonmajor Governmental Funds Description Measure A Palo Verde Valley: This fund is used to account for the revenues from sales taxes, which are restricted to expenditures for Palo Verde Valley programs and activities. Freeway Service Patrol: This fund is used to record the revenues received for the purpose of implementing a freeway service patrol for motorists. Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies: This fund is used to record the revenues received from Department of Motor Vehicle user registration fees for the purpose of implementing an emergency call box system for motorists. State Transit Assistance: This fund is used to account for revenues from sales taxes on gasoline restricted for transit projects. • • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Combining Balance Sheet-Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2004 Assets Cash and investments Receivables: Accounts Interest Prepaid expenditures Total assets Liabilities and fund balances Liabilities: Accounts payable Due to other funds Other liabilities Total liabilities Measure A Palo Verde Valley Special Revenue Freeway Service Patrol Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Total State Nonmajor Transit Governmental Assistance Funds $ 47,606 $ 449,574 $ 2,733,525 $ 1,990,790 $ 5,221,495 227,212 479,276 292,321 737,071 121 1,014 5,231 3,859 9,713 7,387 - 1,735,880 10,225 17,100 $ 274,939 $ 939,577 $ 3,038,464 $ 2,731,720 $ 6,984,700 $ 227,212 $ 272,519 $ 24,117 1,627 83,963 $ 1,724 $ 33,897 163,372 1,952 585,418 221,386 3,579 227,212 298,263 119,812 Fund balances: Reserved for: Local streets and roads 47,727 Prepaid amounts 9,713 7,387 Transit and specialized transportation Unreserved: Designated for motorist assistance 631,601 Total fund balances 47,727 641,314 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 274,939 $ 939,577 $ 2,911,265 2,918,652 3,038,464 165,096 810,383 47,727 17,100 2,566,624 2,566,624 3,542,866 2,566,624 6,174,317 $ 2,731,720 $ 6,984,700 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances- Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2004 Revenues Sales taxes Intergovernmental Interest Vehicle registration user fees Other Total revenues Expenditures Current: Administration: Salaries and benefits General legal services Professional services Office lease Other Total administration Measure A Palo Verde Valley $ 1,114,012 Special Revenue $ Freeway Service Patrol 890,588 365 2,787 495 Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies $ Total State Nonmajor Transit Governmental Assistance Funds - $ 2,899,065 $ 29,944 - 32,076 25,784 1,435,098 2,203 1,499,321 4,013,077 920,532 61,012 1,435,098 2,698 1,114,377 893,870 27,850 2,105 14,645 7,727 14,614 66,941 23,892 1,806 12,566 6,627 12,507 57,398 2,924,849 6,432,417 51,742 3,911 27,211 14,354 27,121 Programs: Local streets and roads 1,114,012 Motorist assistance Transit and specialized transportation - Total programs 1,114,012 Debt service: Principal Interest Total debt service Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) 1,324,102 1,324,102 696 119 654,278 654,278 597 102 1,958,571 1,958,571 124,339 1,114,012 1,978,380 1,958,571 5,050,963 1,293 221 815 208 699 178 1,514 386 Net change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year $ 1,114,012 365 365 47,362 47,727 1,392,066 (498,196) 294,526 294,526 (203,670) 844,984 $ 641,314 $ 712,553 786,768 (248,300) (248,300) 538,468 2,380,184 2,918,652 1,958,571 5,177,202 966,278 1,255,215 - 294,526 (248,300) 966,278 1,600,346 $ 2,566,624 46,226 1,301,441 4,872,876 $ 6,174,317 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission • Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual-Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds • Year Ended June 30, 2004 Measure A Palo Verde Valley Freeway Service Patrol Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies State Transit Assistance Variance with Variance with Variance with Variance with Final Budget Final Budget Final Budget Final Budget Original Final Positive Original Final Positive Original Final Positive Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Revenues Sales taxes $ 1,058,000 $ 1,058,000 $ 1,114,012 $ 56,012 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,666,100 $ 2,666,100 $ 2,899,065 $ 232,965 Intergovernm ental - 1,128,552 1,128,552 890,588 (237,964) 44 44 29,944 29,900 - Interest 365 365 1,260 1,260 2,787 1,527 40,223 40,223 32,076 (8,147) 5,000 5,000 25,784 20,784 Vehicle registration user fees - - - - - 1,275,000 1,275,000 1,435,098 160,098 - Other - - - - 3,536 1,586 495 (1,091) 3,034 1,361 2,203 842 - - Total revenues 1,058,000 1,058,000 1,114,377 56,377 1,133,348 1,131,398 893,870 (237,528) 1,318,301 1,316,628 1,499,321 182,693 2,671,100 2,671,100 2,924,849 253,749 Expenditures Current: Administration: Salaries and benefits 29,412 28,166 27,850 316 25,227 24,111 23,892 219 General legal services 3,172 3,094 2,105 989 2,719 2,652 1,806 846 Professional services 25,545 24,934 14,645 10,289 21,906 21,383 12,566 8,817 Office lease 7,852 7,852 7,727 125 6,734 6,734 6,627 107 Other - 24,697 23,971 14,614 9,357 21,176 20,598 12,507 8,091 Total administration 90,678 88,017 66,941 21,076 77,762 75,478 57,398 18,080 Iv Programs: Local streets and roads 1,058,000 1,114,012 1,114,012 Motorist assistance - - Transit and specialized transportation Total program s 1,058,000 1,114,012 1,114,012 - 1,398,000 1,668,870 1,324,102 344,768 726,800 716,800 654,278 62,522 - 2,666,000 2,666,000 1,958,571 707,429 - 1,398,000 1,668,870 1,324,102 344,768 726,800 716,800 654,278 62,522 2,666,000 2,666,000 1,958,571 707,429 Debt service: Principal 696 (696) 597 (597) Interest - 130 119 (119) 111 102 (102) - Total debt service 130 815 (815) 111 699 (699) Capital outlay - - - 910 910 208 702 780 780 178 602 - - Totalexpenditures 1,058,000 1,114,012 1,114,012 1,489,718 1,757,797 1,392,066 365,731 805,453 793,058 712,553 80,505 2,666,000 2,666,000 1,958,571 707,429 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (56,012) 365 56,377 (356,370) (626,399) (498,196) 128,203 512,848 523,570 786,768 263,198 5,100 5,100 966,278 961,178 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - - 248,300 248,300 294,526 46,226 - - - - Transfers out - - - (248,300) (248,300) (248,300) Total other financing sources (uses) - 248,300 248,300 294,526 46,226 (248,300) (248,300) (248,300) - - Net change in fund balances 5 5 (56 012). 365 $ 56 377 5 (108 070) $ (378.099) (203,670) 5 174 429 5264 548 $ 275 270 538,468 5 263 198 5 5 100 5 5 100 966,278 $ 961 178 Fund balances at beginning of year 47 362 844. 984 2 380184 1.600.346 Fund balances at end of year $ 47,727 $ 641,314 $ 2,918,652 $ 2,566,624 63 Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances —Budget and Actual —Capital Projects and Debt Service Funds Year Ended June 30, 2004 Revenues Interest Other Total revenues Expenditures Debt service: Principal Interest Total debt service Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 500,000 500,000 Measure A Western County Capital Projects Fund Original Budget Final Budget $ 500,000 $ 500,000 500,000 500,000 Actual 551,908 $ 551,908 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 51,908 $ 51,908 Original Budget 1,561,600 $ 1,561,600 Debt Service Fund Final Budget Actual Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 1,561,600 $ 1,381,475 $ (180,125) - (38,988) (38,988) 1,561,600 1,342,487 (219,113) 22,073,100 26,290,261 26,290,000 13,405,000 9,187,839 9,187,217 35,478,100 35,478,100 35,478,100 35,478,100 261 622 35,477,217 35,477,217 883 883 Other financing sources (uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year (10,900,600) (10,900,600) (10,900,600) (10,900,600) (10,400,600) $ (10,400,600) 551,908 (14,272,472) (14,272,472) (13,720,564) $ 15,928,766 $ 2,208,202 51,908 (3,371,872) (3,371,872) (3,319,964) $ (33,916,500) (33,916,500) 35,478,100 35,478,100 35,478,100 35,478,100 1,561,600 $ 1,561,600 (34,134,730) 26,763,922 26,763,922 (7,370,808) 37,624,807 $ 30,253,999 (218,230) (8,714,178) (8,714,178) $ (8,932,408) • • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Expenditures for Local Streets and Roads by Geographic Area —All Special Revenue Funds Year Ended June 30, 2004 Western County: City of Banning $ 622,218 City of Beaumont 331,128 City of Calimesa 164,921 City of Canyon Lake 213,799 City of Corona 4,124,362 City of Hemet 1,704,855 City of Lake Elsinore 938,752 City of Moreno Valley 3,538,845 City of Murrieta 1,478,848 City of Norco 791,642 City of Perris 1,001,254 City of Riverside 7,822,519 City of San Jacinto 565,223 City of Temecula 2,711,966 Riverside County 8,658,970 Other 1,088 34,670,390 Coachella Valley: City of Cathedral City 1,460,327 City of Coachella 370,311 City of Desert Hot Springs 278,814 City of Indian Wells 190,224 City of Indio 1,193,298 City of Palm Desert 2,260,912 City of Palm Springs 1,584,517 City of Rancho Mirage 745,902 Riverside County 1,432,938 Coachella Valley Association of Governments 905,706 Other 1,617 Palo Verde Valley: City of Blythe Riverside County 10,424,566 892,332 221,680 1,114,012 Total local streets and roads expenditures $ 46,208,968 • Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Changes in Assets and Liabilities —Local Projects Agency Fund Year Ended June 30, 2004 Assets Interest receivable Restricted investments held by trustee Total assets Balance Balance July 1, 2003 Additions Deductions June 30, 2004 $ 1,002 $ 2,000,735 $ 2,001,737 $ 776 $ 9,109 9,885 $ 1,002 $ 776 13,598 1,996,246 14,600 $ 1,997,022 Liabilities Due to other governments $ 2,001,737 $ 8,883 $ 13,598 $ 1,997,022 • • • 4667 • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Expenditures for Transit and Specialized Transportation by Geographic Area and Source -All Special Revenue Funds Year Ended June 30, 2004 Sales Taxes Local State Transportation Transit Measure A Fund Assistance Total Western County: Blindness Support Services, Inc. $ 39,707 $ $ $ 39,707 Care -A -Van 181,500 - 181,500 City of Banning 683,263 27,400 710,663 City of Beaumont 820,000 820,000 City of Corona 1,053,099 48,000 1,101,099 City of Riverside - 1,636,330 23,857 1,660,187 Diversified Partnership Industry 60,950 60,950 Exceed 49,800 49,800 Friends of the Moreno Valley Senior Citizens 29,157 29,157 Inland Aids Project 89,000 89,000 Partnership to Preserve Independent Living for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities 240,000 - 240,000 Riverside County Transportation Commission 5,505,543 477,988 5,983,531 Riverside Transit Agency 472,961 26,371,331 393,921 27,238,213 Volunteer Center of Greater Riverside 83,820 - 83,820 Other 25,060 205,759 330 231,149 1,271,955 36,275,325 971,496 38,518,776 Coachella Valley: SunLine Transit Agency 3,022,381 10,031,979 763,875 13,818,235 Palo Verde Valley: Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 851,710 223,200 1,074,910 Total transit and specialized transportation expenditures $ 4,294,336 $ 47,159,014 $ 1,958,571 $ 53,411,921 • • • • • October 13, 2004 To the Riverside County Transportation Commission Commissioners and Citizens of the County of Riverside: Letter of Transmittal State law requires that the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of financial statements presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by independent certified public accountants. Pursuant to that requirement, we hereby issue the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the Commission for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. • • This report consists of management's representations concerning the finances of the Commission. Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the information presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management of the Commission has established comprehensive internal controls that are designed both to protect the Commission's assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the Commission's financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh its benefits, the Commission's comprehensive framework of internal controls has been designed to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material aspects. The enclosed data presents the financial position and results of operations of the Commission on a government -wide and fund basis. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the Commission's financial activities have been included. The Commission's financial statements have been audited by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the Commission for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, are free of material misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unqualified opinion that the Commission's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent auditor's report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. The independent audit of the financial statements of the Commission was part of a broader, federally mandated Single Audit designed to meet the special needs of federal grantor agencies. The standards governing Single Audit engagements require the independent auditor to report not only on the fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with GovernmentAuditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, but also on the government's internal control and compliance with legal requirements, with a special emphasis on internal control and legal requirements involving the administration of federal awards. These reports are available in the Commission's separately issued Single Audit Report. GAAP requires that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The Commission's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors. i 69 This CAFR is presented in three sections: • Introductory: Including the letter of transmittal, organization chart and information, and financial reporting awards. • Financial: Including the independent auditor's report, the basic financial statements with accompanying notes, required supplementary information including the MD&A, and other supplementary information. • Statistical: Including selected financial data relating to the Commission on a multiple -year basis, as well as demographic information relating to the County of Riverside, California (County), where the Commission provides transportation services. Profile of the Government The Commission was established by state law in 1977 to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within the County. The Commission's mission is to assume a leadership role in improving mobility in Riverside County and to maximize the cost effectiveness of transportation dollars in the County. The governing body is the Board of Commissioners (Board), which consists of all five members of the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's 24 cities, and one non -voting member appointed by the Governor. The Commission is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities, and coordinating activities among the County's various transportation operators and agencies. The Commission also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state, and local funds for highway, transit, rail, non -motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and other transportation activities. The Commission also serves as the tax authority and implementation agency for the voter -approved Measure A Transportation Improvement Program. Measure A was approved by the County's electorate in 1988 and imposes a half -cent sales tax for 20 years to fund a specific program of transportation improvements. In November 2002 Riverside County's voters approved a 30 -year extension of Measure A through 2039. Additionally, the Commission provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that provides call box service for motorists, and the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service to assist motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods. These services are provided at no charge to motorists and are funded through a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations. The Commission is also legally responsible for allocating Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, the major source of funds for transit in the County. The TDA provides two major sources of funding: Local Transportation Funds, which are derived from a one -quarter cent state sales tax, and State Transit Assistance, which is derived from the statewide sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. Finally, the Commission has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the County. As the CMA, the Commission coordinates with local jurisdictions in the establishment of congestion mitigation procedures for the County's roadway system. The Commission accounts for its operations using separate funds to manage and report all financial activities of its many programs and SAFE, which is a legally separate entity for which the Commission is financially accountable. The General fund finances most of the administrative and planning functions of the Commission. Special revenue funds are used to account for many of the Commission's revenue sources restricted by law. A capital projects fund is used to account for capital projects supported by the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds. A debt service fund is used to account for debt service activities related to the Commission's sales tax revenue bonds. • • • ii 70 • • • Annually the Commission develops its staffing, operating, and capital plans for the upcoming fiscal year budget. The budget outlines the expected funding sources and uses of funds that represent the Commission's annual commitment to transportation projects and services, and it presents the projected fund balance for all funds that encompass the Commission. The budget is recorded in the Commission's accounting system, where it is compared with actual performance. Staff ensures that the budget is adopted by the Board prior to the beginning of each fiscal year. During the fiscal year, all budget amendments requiring Board approval are presented to the Board for consideration and adoption. Economic Condition and Outlook Riverside County continues to experience significant growth due to population increase, available and affordable housing, and a wider base in its economic engine. This growth in the County has resulted in the highest levels of sales tax revenues in the Commission's history. In fiscal year (FY) 2003/04, while most of California and the national economy were flat or experienced modest increases in retail sales, sales tax revenues in the County increased approximately 14%. This reflects a good local economy that continues to grow, because the County has continued to draw jobs, residents, and affordable housing away from the Los Angeles area. New housing prices are rising and industrial vacancies continue to decline, as the Inland Empire continues to expand its warehousing and support role to the greater Los Angeles economy. The availability of affordable space for both residents and businesses along with improved access to employment centers in Los Angeles and Orange counties are the primary reasons for expansion. In terms of employment, the County continues to add jobs but at a slower rate than in past years. The retail sector and population -serving sectors of the economy are expected to play major roles in creating thousands of new jobs. Regardless of recent trends, the County faces formidable challenges in terms of improving the educational levels of its residents as well as providing needed infrastructure. The state of California (State) and national economy remain in a slow growth period. The outlook for the County seems to be a moderate growth of sales and jobs, but perhaps not as significant as in prior years. Sales taxes are expected to remain at consistent levels due to the growth in pop- ulation. Commission staff has projected sales taxes revenues to increase 4% in its FY 2004/05 budget. FINANCIAL PLANNING Proactive financial planning is a critical element for the success of the Commission as it builds for the future. Continually revisiting revenues and projecting expenditures ensures that the Commission's expectations are realistic and goals are achievable. Scarce resources can be directed to projects of regional significance or, with additional funding project priorities, can be expanded to address unfunded project requirements or developing needs. The Commission has taken action in prior years to update its projection of Measure A revenues, with the most recent update to this process in 2001. The revised projections from that effort now provide the foundation for updating the Commission's strategic direction. Funding from the State is being used to augment Measure A sales tax revenues to ensure, to the extent possible, completion of the listed projects in the 1988 Measure A Expenditure Plan. The information also provided the foundation of future planning, which became the new expenditure plan for a 30 -year renewal of Measure A. The renewal of Measure A was approved by the County's voters in November 2002, making the County the only county in California to successfully garner two-thirds (2/3) supermajorities for a transportation sales tax two separate times. The new expenditure plan outlines the projects needed to keep up with the growth in the County. The State's budget problems have severely curtailed State spending on transportation. As a result, the Commission has taken a number of creative steps to fund projects and maintain progress. The process of review by the Commission will continue on an annual basis to ensure that steady progress is made toward project completion and that changes in direction made possible by increased revenues or innovative approaches are quickly implemented. iii 71 MAJOR HIGHLIGHTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS Capital Project Delivery and Implementation The Capital Project Development and Delivery Department is responsible for major highway and rail capital projects from initial environmental study through preliminary engineering, final design, right of way acquisition, and construction. This past year was one of significant accomplishments for the Commission as progress was made on a number of major projects. Difficult funding decisions were made on millions of dollars in transportation projects to expand freeways, improve mobility on streets and roads, and improve rail passenger facilities. The Commission's most ambitious transportation project, done in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), brings improvements to the State Route (SR) 60/SR-91/Interstate (1) 215 interchange, which will add direct connectors, truck lanes, soundwalls, and new and widened bridges to improve the efficiency of this interchange. Work began in early 2004 and utilizes a construction process known as "design -sequencing." Design -sequencing is intended to combine many design and construction tasks and will likely shave construction by a number of months and generate cost savings for the overall project. While the reconstruction of the SR-60/SR-91/I-215 interchange is a Measure A project, it will be financed primarily from State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) dollars. Given the State's budget woes and dependence on STIP dollars to balance its General Fund budget, funding for the SR-60/SR-9111-215 interchange became uncertain in early 2003. This uncertainty required the Commission to loan the State Measure A dollars to ensure the timely commencement of construction in January 2004. This advancement of local dollars that will be reimbursed by the STIP is known as an AB 3090 process and was approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in September 2003. This action ensures that the project will stay on schedule with completion expected in 2008. During the next few years, SR -60 will be home to a number of needed improvements. Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) dollars are being used to fund the construction of high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on SR -60 through Moreno Valley. Construction on this $41 million project began in Summer 2003 and will be completed in late 2004 or early 2005. The completion date is now months ahead of schedule and will likely result in additional cost savings. The Commission has also approved the allocation of additional CMAQ dollars to construct an HOV lane and a general purpose lane in each direction on SR -60 between 1-15 and Valley Way in the western edge of the County. This project has already been environmentally cleared and will be ready for construction in early 2005, assuming that State funding is made available by the CTC. SR -74 between Lake Elsinore and Perris is also being improved by the Measure A program. This two-lane road is being widened into a four lane highway with medians, improved drainage, and safety features. The project is being constructed in two phases with construction on the first phase already complete. Construction began on the second phase in early 2004, and completion is expected by late 2005. Another Measure A effort that is benefiting motorists are improvements to SR -111 in the Coachella Valley. Improvements have been completed in a number of cities in the past year including three projects in the City of Palm Desert. As is the case with all arterial improvements in the Coachella Valley, the funding for the project and project development is a cooperative effort between the Commission, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), and affected cities. Rail Development, Operations and Support The Commission is one of five partners in the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), which operates Metrolink commuter rail service in the Southland. Two RCTC Commissioners sit on the SCRRA's 11 -member governing board, and Commission staff serves as liaison through Metrolink's Technical Advisory Committee. The operation of a regional railroad, with five funding partners, is a continual exercise in consensus building. • • • iv 72 • • • The County's participation in commuter rail service began with the passage of Measure A in 1988. The voters of this County were the first in Southern California to specify commuter rail service as a priority transportation improvement project. The subsequent passage of similar measures in adjoining counties and the passage of statewide rail infrastructure bonds in 1990 provided enough capital funding to build the initial system. Now consisting of seven lines, serving origins and destinations in six counties, the system carries an average of 37,000 passengers each weekday. The Commission owns and operates five stations served by Metrolink in the County. The Riverside Line originates in Downtown Riverside and stops at the Commission's Pedley station before proceeding through Ontario, Pomona, Industry, and Montebello to Los Angeles Union Station. Ridership on the Riverside Line increased in the past year to approximately 4,460 daily riders. The Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line originates in nearby San Bernardino with stops in the Downtown Riverside, La Sierra, North Main Corona, and West Corona stations before entering Orange County with stops in Anaheim, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, Irvine, Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo, and San Juan Capistrano. The IEOC line has been described as the first suburb -to -suburb commuter rail service in the nation. Patronage on the line continues to increase resulting in an average daily ridership that exceeds 3,700. Metrolink also offers the 91 Line to provide the commuters another alternative to commute from Riverside to Los Angeles with stops in Riverside County, Orange County and Los Angeles County. Patronage on the line continues to increase resulting in an average daily ridership that exceeds 1,800. The Commission also underwrites a variety of special trains under direct charter from Metrolink known as the Beach Trains. This popular service on weekends during the summer provides transportation to Orange County beaches for thousands of Inland Empire residents throughout the summer. The exposure to the Beach Trains on the weekend has been shown to increase demand and interest in Metrolink's regular weekday service. During the summer of 2004, Beach Trains ridership remained strong, thanks to an effective, cooperative marketing agreement with the Press -Enterprise, the County's local newspaper. Metrolink Capital Projects With the continued growth of patronage, commuter rail's challenges for the future include securing state or federal allocations for more passenger coaches and for additional train storage and maintenance facilities. Yet another challenge is the need to offer Metrolink service to a wider area of the County. In 2004, the Commission released a Draft Environmental Assessment for the expansion of commuter rail service along the San Jacinto Branch Line. Along with the release of the document, the Commission also held a series of public meetings. The meetings encouraged public input into the environmental clearance process and also raised the level of awareness and public support for the project. It is anticipated that this addition to Riverside County's Metrolink service will begin in 2008. As part of the marketing effort, the new line is now referred to as the Perris Valley Line; it will serve new destinations that include the University of California, Riverside; March Air Reserve Base; and the cities of Moreno Valley and Perris. Extending rail service to these areas of the County will require a substantial investment in upgrading the rail corridor to accommodate passenger trains. The expected cost exceeds $179 million, and the Commission will seek federal funding from the Federal Highway Act that should be considered by Congress in 2005. Planning for the Future—CETAP In terms of future progress, the Commission has given its unanimous support to the Riverside County Integrated Project and its transportation component, the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP). As a stakeholder driven planning process, CETAP has benefited from the guidance of a broad spectrum of citizens. The County and the Commission are working together in a first -of -its kind endeavor to provide for new transportation options and land use planning to support the economic growth of the County while providing for preservation of open space and protection for endangered species. v 73 CETAP addresses the impact of future population and economic growth on the existing transportation system by identifying and establishing new transportation corridors and arterial system improvements. The corridor options to be considered will include rail, bus, transit, and highway modes and will be considered through the careful study of future growth patterns. All work will be done in cooperation with federal and state mandated environmental and open space conservation efforts. The Commission's CETAP work will focus on four new transportation corridors. Two of these corridors are located within the County, while the other two would link Riverside County with the neighboring counties of Orange and San Bernardino. The Commission has just completed the Tier 1 environmental work for an internal north/south transportation corridor between Winchester and Temecula. The Commission now can protect right-of-way for the future widening of 1-15 and 1-215 in the South County as well as a future French Valley Parkway connection from Winchester Road to 1-15. The main focus for the Commission in 2004 and 2005 is the advancement of an east -west corridor alternative along Cajalco Road and Ramona Expressway, to traverse south of Lake Mathews. This proposed corridor is the Mid County Parkway, and the Commission is now pursuing a project -level environmental document. This work began in 2004 and requires a great deal of cooperation between the Commission, the County, and resource agencies from the State and federal government. Public input is also a major component of this effort, and a series of public meetings have been held in the project area along with the creation of a website devoted solely to the project and a newsletter. A related project that affects the communities of Hemet and San Jacinto involves the realignment of SR -79. Approval has been granted by federal resource agencies to proceed with the environmental process that will determine an alignment for what will be a more efficient highway with greater capacity. The Measure A extension program approved by voters in 2002 includes funding for the project that is expected to go to construction in 2009. Finally, the Commission has approved funding of a major investment study in cooperation with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and Transportation Corridor Agencies to consider new transportation corridors and alternatives between Riverside and Orange counties. This 18 -month study began in mid -2004 at a cost of $3.3 million and will be completed in 18 months. As part of the effort, the Commission and OCTA have hosted a number of public events in each county and are conducting public outreach programs. Commuter Assistance Program The Commission's Commuter Assistance Program provides a variety of rideshare services both to employers and commuters. Through voluntary participation, commuters and employers receive a direct benefit from their sales tax dollars, and the entire region benefits from reduced traffic congestion and improved air quality as a result of trip elimination or use of alternative means of transportation. The cornerstone of the Commuter Assistance Program continues to be the Advantage Rideshare Program, a short-term incentive project, which offers $2 per day for each day new ridesharers use an alternate mode of transportation in a three-month period. Long-term ridesharers are recognized and rewarded for their continuing commitment to using alternate modes of transportation to and from work through the Club Ride Program. In FY 2003/04, the value of a membership in Club Ride was greatly enhanced by the addition of 300 new merchants to the catalog of available offers. This enhancement brings the total of available merchant discount offers to more than 400. During FY 2003/04, the Commission's rideshare programs reduced the number of single occupant vehicle trips by more than 63,000. The Commission's Commuter Assistance Program works with more than 600 employer worksites throughout the County in providing commuter benefits to employees. All of these benefits are offered at no cost to the employer. • • • Vi 74 • • • Another core activity of the Commission's rideshare activities is the operation of the Commuter Exchange. This is a 40' mobile resource center that participates at various events including employer transportation fairs, community activities, and elementary schools. The Commuter Exchange includes a service called Education on the Road for third and fourth grade classes in Western Riverside County. Education on the Road is a rolling transportation field trip, designed with imaginative, interactive exhibits and activities for all ages. It guides students and teachers through a structured learning experience. Getting students to start thinking early about how to reduce traffic congestion and clean the air before they start driving will payoff with clean air dividends in future years. During FY 2003/04, the Board directed staff to move forward with the steps necessary to create a set of vehicle specifications and procure a new 40' mobile education vehicle to replace the aging existing unit. Recently approved for purchase, this vehicle will be specially constructed on a heavy duty commercial transit bus chassis and utilize state of the art clean air technology. It is expected to be delivered for service in September 2005. The Commission's success in serving commuters and employers within the County continues to be replicated in adjoining San Bernardino County. The San Bernardino Associated Govemments (SANBAG) renewed its contract with the Commission for the eighth year to provide a sister commuter assistance program for its residents. This unique bi-county partnership allows for greater cost efficiency in program delivery and consistency of program application for all participants in the Inland Empire (Riverside and San Bernardino counties). Additional FY 2003/04 accomplishments include expansion of the Inland Empire ridematching database system to include Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange counties. The Commission developed the expansion in partnership with the transportation agencies in those counties to create a five -county regional database. The Commission also designed and implemented a new electronic commuter survey format and process to further support the ridematching database. This new survey tool will allow employers the option to survey their employees electronically which will reduce cost and make the surveying process more attractive to implement at their worksites. Consistent with the addition of value to commuters who rideshare, the Commission also developed and implemented a website, www.Rideshareplus.info, which offers additional services and benefits to Club Ride members. This service also supports the enhanced merchant discount catalog. Finally, the Commission has been active in the procurement of partnering opportunities with Inland Empire media outlets to further promote the benefits of ridesharing. A radio campaign with local station KFRG and an employer ad campaign with the Business Press were all launched during FY 2003/04. Specialized Transit The Commission has maintained a long-term commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its Specialized Transit Program, the Commission has provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators to assist in the provision of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. During FY 2003/04, the nonprofit operators provided approximately 12,700 Measure A trips. Along with support of traditional dial -a -ride services, the Commission supports innovative programs providing transit assistance in hard -to -serve rural areas or for riders having very special transit needs. Two additional programs that receive a significant share of Measure A's transit funding are the Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project (TRIP) and the Transportation Access Program (TAP). The TRIP program reimburses car trips made on behalf of seniors and persons with disabilities. As part of the TAP program, the Commission provides funding to various agencies for subsidized transit tickets that are distributed by social service agencies to clients who are truly needy and require access to medical appointments, job interviews, or other needed services. The Volunteer Center serves more than 43,400 clients through the TAP program. During FY 2003/04, the TRIP Program reimbursed 15,970 car trips and the TAP Program provided more than 50,200 transit tickets. In October 2003 the Commission also instituted a new program to provide reimbursements for taxi trips. This has led to lower costs and better service. Since inception of the taxi reimbursement program, over 21,000 passengers have benefited from the program. vii 75 Motorist Assistance Programs In cooperation with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and Caltrans, the Commission, in its capacity as the SAFE, assists motorists who experience accidents, mechanical breakdowns, or other unforeseen problems by providing access to cellular call boxes along the County's major highways. The Commission's system includes approximately 1,150 call boxes serving more than 650 miles of highways. The call box program is funded by an annual $1 surcharge added to vehicle registrations and generates more than $1.4 million annually for the County. Each call box is a battery -powered, solar -charged roadside terminal containing a microprocessor and cellular telephone. Spacing between call boxes ranges from one -quarter mile in high traffic areas to one mile in remote desert areas of the County. Call boxes in the County are installed on lnterstates 10, 15, and 215; U.S. Route 95; and portions of State Routes 31, 60, 62, 71, 74, 78, 79, 86, 86S, 91, 111, 177, 243, and 371 as well as park and ride lots and commuter rail stations. The phones are programmed to call a private call answer center and the call box operator responds to the call by routing emergency calls to the CHP for appropriate services (i.e. ambulance, tow truck, fire, or police unit) or providing a direct connection to routine service through auto clubs or other private tow and service providers. Call box operators answered approximately 23,700 calls during FY 2003/04. In February 2004, the Board adopted the Five Year Strategic and Financial Plan (5 -Year Plan) for the County's call box program. The 5 -Year Plan recommended five improvements to the call box system including Americans with Disabilities Act enhancements for site accessibility; retrofit of all "B" and "C" sites to meet Caltrans' new design requirements; conversion from analog to digital technology; increased spacing between call boxes to a minimum of 1/2 mile; and, if necessary, installation of 5' X 5' pedestrian pads. In an effort to relieve congestion and reduce pollution, the Commission provides an additional motorist assistance program with the FSP. The FSP program is a special team of 13 tow trucks traveling along selected County freeways during peak commuter hours to assist drivers when their vehicles break down or experience other mechanical problems. The FSP tow trucks patrol portions of SR -91, 1-215, 1-15, and SR -60 from 5:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday with the exception of holidays. The purpose of the FSP is to remove disabled vehicles from the freeway as quickly as possible to help keep freeways moving during rush hour periods. The FSP program provides such services as changing a flat tire, providing one gallon of fuel, taping radiator hoses, or towing the vehicle off the freeway to designated locations where the motorist can make other arrangements for repair. Service provided by the FSP is free of charge to the motorist. The FSP is funded by the Riverside County SAFE and the State. During FY 2003/04, the FSP provided assistance to approximately 32,600 motorists. Another effort augments existing FSP service with additional tow trucks in construction areas as another means of construction -related congestion mitigation. This is currently taking place on SR -60 with service being provided during regular FSP hours and on SR -91 which provides midday service from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Cash Management On June 30, 2004, approximately 79% of the Commission's cash and investments were deposited with the Riverside County Treasurer in the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund. In addition, the Commission had approximately 2% of its cash and investments in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. Unexpended bond funds and debt reserve funds were maintained in money market mutual funds and investments in U.S. government securities held by the trustee. Restricted investments held by the trustee for the Commission's bonds are set aside in accordance with the bond indentures for the purpose of making bond interest and principal payments. e • • viii 76 • • The Commission's investments are in compliance with its investment policy, which is approved annually to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and the foremost investment objective: safeguarding of principal. Quarterly reports are presented to the Board to review compliance with the Commission's investment policy as well as the overall performance of the Commission's investment portfolio. Further details of the Commission's cash and investments at June 30, 2004, are set forth in notes to the financial statements. Debt Administration As of June 30, 2004, the Commission's outstanding debt consisting of sales tax revenue bonds was $151.5 million. Final maturity of the Measure A sales tax revenue bonds is scheduled for 2009, when the current Measure A program expires. Further details of the Commission's long-term debt at June 30, 2004, are included in the notes to the financial statements. Risk Management The Commission protects itself against the adverse consequences of material or financial loss through a balanced program of risk retention, risk transfers, and the purchase of commercial insurance. Loss exposures retained by the Commission are treated as normal operating expenditures include any loss contingency not covered by the Commission's purchased insurance policies. Exposures for which insurance is purchased with various retention or deductible levels include workers' compensation and employer liability, employee benefits, vehicle liability, building contents (property), employee theft and dishonesty, crime, fiduciary, and public official liabilities. Rail properties and construction projects are protected through a combination of commercial insurance purchased by the Commission, insurance required of Commission consultants, and a self-insurance fund established by the SCRRA. Pension and Other Post Employment Benefits The Commission contributes to the Public Employee's Retirement System (PERS) of the State of California, an agent multiple -employer public employee retirement system that acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities in the State. Financial activities for PERS are not included in this document as the Board does not oversee PERS. The Commission also provides post retirement health benefits for certain retirees and their dependents. As of June 30, 2004, there were five retired employees receiving these benefits, which are financed on a pay-as-you-go basis. GAAP will require the Commission to report a liability in the financial statements beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007 in connection with its obligation to provide these benefits. Awards The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Commission for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. This was the 11th straight year the Commission has received this prestigious national award, which recognizes conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR conforming to program standards. Such CAFR must satisfy both GAAP and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current report continues to conform to the Certificate of Achievement programs requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA for consideration for another certificate. Acknowledgments The CAFR each year is a collaborative effort by Commission staff, its independent auditors, and other consultants. The undersigned are grateful to all staff for their willingness to expend the effort necessary to ensure the financial information contained herein is informative and completed within established deadlines. Special thanks must be extended to the Commission's auditors, Finance staff, and the Director of Public Information for the time, effort, and commitment so vital for the final completion of the CAFR. In closing, without the leadership and the support of the Board, preparation of this report would not have been possible. Its prudent management must be credited for the strength of the Commission's fiscal condition, and its vision ensures that the Riverside County Transportation Commission will be on the move planning for and building a better future. Very truly yours, ERIC A. HALEY Executive Director THERESIA TREVINO Chief Financial Officer • • • x 78 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Organizational Chart Board of Com missioners • Transit Policy Committees Plans & Programs • Budget & Implementation • Property Executive Committee Advisory Co mmittees •`Technical Advisory • Citizens Advisory Legal Counsel Executive Management Public Outreach & Services — Public Information & Communications — Media Relations — Commuter Assistance —Call Box Program — Freew ay Serv ice Patrol Administrative Services — Clerk of the Board & Board Relations — Human Resources — Community Affairs —Office & Records Management — Disadvantaged Business Enterprise —Procurement — Staff Development & Communications — Budget & Implementation Committee Support Intergovernmental & Legislative Affairs — Air Quality — Legislative Advocacy — Legislative Analysis Major Capital & Other Progra ms — Highway & Rail Capi al Programs — Rail Operations & Support — Property Management Finance & Management Services —Financial Management —Contract Management — Budget Development Transportation Planning & Programming — State Transportation Improvement Program — Regional Transportation Plan — New Corridor Planning — Congestion Manage ment — Plans & Programs, Technical & Citizens Advisory Committees Support —Transit Planning 79 • • • Name and Position Riverside County Transportation Commission List of Principal Officials As of June 30, 2004 Board of Commissioners Title Agency Roy Wilson Chairman (Commission) County of Riverside, District 4 Robin Lowe 1st Vice Chairman (Commission) City of Hemet James A. Venable 2nd Vice Chairman (Commission) County of Riverside, District 3 Art Welch Member City of Banning Roger Berg Member City of Beaumont Robert Crain Member City of Blythe Shenna Moqeet Member City of Calimesa Jack Wamsley Member City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis Member City of Cathedral City Juan M. DeLara Member City of Coachella Jeff Miller Member City of Corona Matt Weyuker Member City of Desert Hot Springs Percy L. Byrd Member City of Indian Wells Michael H. Wilson Vice Chairman (Plans & Programs Committee) City of Indio Terry Henderson Chairman (Budget & Implementation Committee) City of La Quinta Bob Magee Vice Chairman (Budget & Implementation Committee) City of Lake Elsinore Frank West Member City of Moreno Valley Kelly Seyarto Member City of Murrieta Frank Hall Chairman (Plans & Programs Committee) City of Norco Dick Kelly Member City of Palm Desert Ronald Oden Member City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch Member City of Perris Ron Meepos Member City of Rancho Mirage Ameal Moore Member City of Riverside Chris Buydos Member City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts Member City of Temecula Bob Buster Member County of Riverside, District 1 John F. Tavaglione Member County of Riverside, District 2 Marion Ashley Member County of Riverside, District 5 Anne Mayer Governor's Appointee Caltrans District #8 Management Staff Eric A. Haley, Executive Director Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services John Standiford, Director of Public Information Marilyn Williams, Director of Regional Programs and Public Affairs xii 80 • • • Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to Riverside County Transportation Commission, California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. President 4e040, Executive Director xiii81 • • This page intentionally left blank. 82 • • • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Government -wide Revenues by Function Last Three Fiscal Years Program revenues: Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions General revenues: Taxes Investment earnings Other Total Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2002 (1) $ 11,804,372 4,746,603 102,673,943 5,942,480 6,176,905 2003 2004 $ 1,561,265 10,489,860 21,190,027 113,271,233 4,932,021 2,282,582 $ 1,170,773 61,412,882 1,183,922 189,697,992 3,115,232 536,002 $ 131,344,303 $ 153,726,988 $ 257,116,803 (1) GASB 34 was implemented July 1, 2001. Prior years' information is not available. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Riverside County Transportation Commission Government -wide Expenses by Function Last Three Fiscal Years General government Bicycles and pedestrians CETAP Commuter assistance Commuter rail Highways Local streets and roads Motorist assistance Planning and programming Property management Regional arterials Transit and specialized transportation Interest expense (2) Total Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2002 (1) 2003 2004 $ 5,407,800 $ 2,088,746 14,772,034 27,850,447 36,541,323 2,559,409 5,890,377 145,158 11,720,342 8,680,284 2,318,033 5,659,863 29,812,083 40,256,464 1,843,017 2,978,044 154,582 8,428,021 9,913,504 10,381,790 4,307,544 $ 3,909,942 927,138 608,882 2,959,732 8,702,803 35,456,330 46,208,968 1,978,380 4,287,696 338,353 13,996,300 53,411,921 11,736,129 $ 115,655,920 $ 116,052,945 $ 184,522,574 (1) GASB 34 was implemented July 1, 2001. Prior years' information is not available. (2) Interest expense of $12,242,557 in 2002 was classified within each respective program. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports • • • 48 85 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Government -wide Net (Expenses) Revenues by Function Last Three Fiscal Years General government Bicycles and pedestrians CETAP Commuter assistance Commuter rail Highways Local streets and roads Motorist assistance Planning and programming Property management Regional arterials Transit and specialized transportation Interest expense (2) Total Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2002 (1) 2003 $ (5,400,507) $ (4,303,046) (521,906) (10,977,888) (24,921,874) (36,541,323) (2,559,409) (2,382,857) (145,158) (11,720,342) (3,933,681) $ (99,104,945) $ (1,148,983) 15,938,720 (25,986,246) (40,256,464) 440,518 (1,647,709) 58,729 (8,428,021) (7,097,501) (10,381,790) (82,811,793) $ (120,754,997) 2004 $ (3,900,976) (927,138) 17,198,731 (1,224,463) (7,194,979) (17,644,525) (46,208,968) 377,207 (2,849,166) 56,952 3,811,313 (50,512,856) (11,736,129) (1) GASB 34 was implemented July 1, 2001. Prior years' information is not available. (2) Interest expense of $12,242,557 in 2002 was classified within each respective program. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Fiscal Year Ended June 30 2002 (1) 2003 2004 Riverside County Transportation Commission Government -wide Net Assets Last Three Fiscal Years Governmental Activities Invested in capital assets, net of related debt $ 130,051,343 128,247,454 104,716,712 Restricted $ (44,501,093) 154,913,051 232,719,198 Unrestricted Total $ 5,985,213 $ 91,535,463 (174,443,946) 108,716,559 (121,829,477) 215,606,433 (1) GASB 34 was implemented July 1, 2001. Prior years' information is not available. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports • • • 5087 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission General Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years Other Transportation Fiscal Measure A Sales Uniform Year Sales Tax Taxes (1) Mitigation Fee 1995 $ 50,785,971 $ 28,947,780 $ 1996 55,413,939 32,794,325 1997 57,888,149 33,505,474 1998 63,496,222 36,100,342 1999 70,396,828 39,599,825 2000 81,543,733 45,517,349 2001 93,850,494 52,670,566 2002 95,797,286 53,848,505 2003 105,782,596 59,225,011 2004 120,564,890 69,133,102 35,615,226 Reimbursements $ 12,947,846 8,114,912 5,514,049 9,754,287 5,334,206 6,542,447 5,286,109 11,804,372 26,795,899 23,276,534 Interest Other (2) Total (3) $8,220,527 $ 4,666,051 $105,568,175 7,740,317 5,274,781 109,338,274 6,869,873 5,896,496 109,674,041 5,471,073 6,190,293 121,012,217 4,741,631 6,688,885 126,761,375 5,059,048 7,372,191 146,034,768 10,961,674 7,866,195 170,635,038 5,942,480 10,923,508 178,316,151 5,245,445 8,758,135 205,807,086 3,115,232 5,411,819 257,116,803 (1) The Local Transportation Fund annually allocates sales tax to the General fund for transportation planning activities and administration and commuter rail operations. For 2004 $7,306,968 was allocated for these purposes. The other sales tax revenue amount has not been reduced by the annual allocation. (2) Other revenue includes vehicle registration user fees. State transit grant was included through 2003 and was classified as other sales taxes beginning in 2004. (3) Includes all governmental fund types. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Fiscal Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Riverside County Transportation Commission General Government Expenditures by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Administration $ 2,723,025 2,732,131 2,677,290 2,813,814 2,954,923 3,031,640 3,012,800 3,641,770 4,120,493 3,663,957 Programs $ 94,808,303 106,225,072 105,374,197 104,875,560 87,155,032 98,323,375 113,272,372 129,440,537 175,709,386 165,001,873 (1) Includes all governmental fund types. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Debt $ 23,379,723 25,327,762 25,208,531 74,344,388 30,525,757 30,527,304 35,442,358 35,545,895 35,555,285 35,508,587 Intergovernmental Capital Distributions Outlay $ 377,927 $ 177,527 367,936 144,537 305,095 53,677 309,000 306,660 397,302 113,241 518,609 50,319 632,361 63,502 605,485 561,306 667,234 340,804 750,183 8,000 Total (1) $ 121,466,505 134,797,438 133,618,790 182,649,422 121,146,255 132,451,247 152,423,393 169,794,993 216,393,202 204,932,600 • • • 5289 • • Riverside County Transportation Commission General Government Expenditures by Authorized Source Last Ten Fiscal Years Local State Transportation AB2766 Fiscal Transportation Transit Motorist Uniform Mobile Source Year General (1) Fund Assistance Assistance (2) Measure A Mitigation Fee Reduction Total (3) 1995 $ 5,474,794 $ 25,263,303 $ 1,978,000 $ 1,503,004 $ 87,247,404 $ - $ - $ 121,466,505 1996 7,152,501 27,821,652 1,026,465 1,655,156 96,519,937 621,727 134,797,438 1997 7,674,298 26,134,968 1,269,583 1,862,553 96,180,072 497,316 133,618,790 1998 8,650,986 28,847,714 1,535,401 1,814,989 141,800,332 - 182,649,422 1999 8,858,531 31,584,293 1,515,684 1,806,430 77,381,029 - 288 121,146,255 2000 11,451,808 36,029,016 1,527,661 1,888,858 81,553,904 - 132,451,247 2001 10,868,588 38,672,495 3,529,784 2,211,201 97,141,325 - 152,423,393 2002 13,745,778 45,087,604 4,255,114 2,728,151 103,978,346 169,794,993 2003 11,827,703 51,679,898 5,809,085 2,078,789 144,997,727 - 216,393,202 2004 11,011,304 50,304,661 1,958,571 1,978,380 138,421,299 1,258,385 204,932,600 (1) Includes General and motorist assistance administrative expenditures. (2) Includes Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies and Freeway Service Patrol. (3) Includes all governmental fund types. Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Governmental Funds —Fund Balances Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 General $ 3,523,900 4,287,989 4,596,712 3,859,266 3,934,367 4,119,844 5,591,400 6,480,117 5,757,792 7,352,174 Measure A Western County Special Revenue $ 16,650,151 18,202,760 20,479,011 20,611,011 25,847,423 35,465,719 48,710,889 60,383,031 87,281,322 115,098,845 Measure A Coachella Valley Special Revenue $ 32,341,826 33,386,188 35,589,083 12,869,418 14,113,167 13,083,218 9,279,185 6,070,965 7,428,955 7,253,630 Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports $ Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 34,439,947 Local Transportation Fund $ 5,452,943 $ 4,865,103 7,444,230 9,803,703 12,824,801 16,893,969 25,356,677 33,925,445 34,295,645 42,593,252 Measure A Western County Capital Projects 21,020,929 21,532,220 21,590,742 39,716,130 36,192,064 34,131,796 68,555,031 45,938,904 15,928,766 2,208,202 Debt Service $ 2,567,816 2,748,357 3,092,422 4,811,306 6,907,720 8,219,824 10,727,286 38,179,974 37,624,807 30,253,999 Nonmajor Governmental Total Fund Funds Balances $ 62,978,374 47,782,885 17,673,648 18,587,005 16,053,698 17,542,391 15,382,087 7,613,525 4,872,876 6,174,317 $ 144,535,939 132,805,502 110,465,848 110,257,839 115,873,240 129,456,761 183,602,555 198,591,961 193,190,163 245,374,366 91 • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Table of Sales Tax Revenues by Program and Geographic Area —General and Special Revenue Funds Year Ended June 30, 2004 General Fund Administration $ 3,756,657 Planning and programming 1,550,311 Commuter assistance Highways Commuter rail 5,000,000 Local streets and roads Regional arterials Specialized transportation Transportation Development Act Source: Finance Department Special Revenue Funds Western Coachella County Valley $ - $ 2,166,831 33,608,250 4,466,643 14,567,585 34,669,304 10,422,166 11,911,047 2,166,832 2,977,762 47,323,958 12,977,959 $134,502,760 $ 42,755,577 $ 2,132,687 Palo Verde Valley $ - $ 1,018,675 Total 3,756,657 1,550,311 2,166,831 38,074,893 19,567,585 46,205,482 11,911,047 5,144,594 61,320,592 $ 10,306,968 $ 189,697,992 • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Taxable Sales and Population by City Taxable Sales (1) Population (2) City of Banning $ 183,216 27,200 City of Beaumont 91,447 16,350 City of Blythe 153,498 21,950 City of Calimesa 31,868 7,350 City of Canyon Lake 10,617 10,650 City of Cathedral City 761,564 48,600 City of Coachella 155,831 27,650 City of Corona 2,186,753 141,800 City of Desert Hot Springs 65,974 17,700 City of Hemet 722,899 63,800 City of Indian Wells 57,178 4,430 City of Indio 536,126 59,100 City of La Quinta 372,039 32,500 City of Lake Elsinore 430,117 35,350 City of Moreno Valley 884,758 155,100 City of Murrieta 533,755 77,700 City of Norco 456,408 25,500 City of Palm Desert 1,209,385 44,800 City of Palm Springs 617,260 44,250 City of Perris 376,340 41,300 City of Rancho Mirage 344,016 15,500 City of Riverside 3,660,907 277,000 City of San Jacinto 79,266 26,700 City of Temecula 1,856,973 77,500 Incorporated 15,778,195 1,299,780 Unincorporated 3,720,799 477,000 Countywide $ 19,498,994 1,776,780 California $ 440,950,094 36,144,000 Source: (1) California State Board of Equalization, expressed in thousands, for the calendar ended December 31, 2002 (2) California State Department of Finance as of January 1, 2004 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Sources of County of Riverside Taxable Sales by Business Type Last Ten Calendar Years (In Thousands) 01 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002(1) Apparel stores $ 395,084 $ 406,973 $ 421,007 $ 474,384 $ 488,625 $ 498,753 $ 495,945 $ 538,578 $ 565,295 $ 610,388 General merchandise stores 1,267,249 1,350,233 1,391,979 1,429,338 1,510,995 1,642,636 1,845,651 2,062,738 2,275,736 2,459,046 Specialty stores 604,328 649,285 676,978 790,183 890,940 1,004,203 1,186,231 1,277,359 1,379,979 1,501,106 Food stores 653,556 648,486 657,598 696,627 734,532 758,829 828,641 889,894 930,232 967,171 Package liquor stores 57,368 53,418 53,928 53,700 52,002 48,761 52,951 57,345 56,250 58,459 Eating/drinking 849,961 884,970 919,233 979,535 1,030,655 1,117,921 1,233,274 1,364,808 1,465,467 1,559,215 Hom e furnishing and appliances 267,673 299,746 327,517 337,433 328,893 367,812 447,594 517,578 526,083 594,049 Building m aterials and farm im plements 654,377 708,056 723,896 787,905 907,179 1,073,893 1,017,564 1,210,838 1,339,020 1,427,831 Service stations 739,399 741,435 767,675 836,767 863,522 800,435 983,739 1,196,693 1,223,753 1,249,646 Autom obile, boat, motorcycle and plane 1,227,707 1,388,614 1,495,603 1,617,189 1,700,667 1,963,205 2,161,678 2,814,375 3,134,935 3,553,525 Miscellaneous 493,504 496,395 511,089 560,811 618,792 696,051 1,227,303 1,112,012 1,109,093 1,151,821 Total all other outlets 2,065,069 2,186,922 2,374,115 2,574,989 2,845,569 3,168,355 3,596,374 3,937,231 4,225,712 4,366,737 $ 9,275,275 $ 9,814,533 $ 10,320,618 $ 11,138,861 $ 11,972,371 $ 13,140,854 $ 15,076,945 $ 16,979,449 $ 18,231,555 $ 19,498,994 (1) Represents m ost recent data available Source: State Board of Equalization 94 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Computation of Legal Debt Margin June 30, 2004 Total debt limit authorized under Ordinance 88-1 (Measure A) $ 525,000,000 Amount of debt applicable to debt limit (151,535,000) Legal debt margin $ 373,465,000 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Ratio of General Bonded Debt Service Expenditures to Total General Governmental Expenditures Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Principal 1995 $ 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 10,685,011 $ 11,608,286 12,071,814 59,930,614 17,629,705 18,529,107 22,478,844 24,068,939 25,173,492 26,290,000 Total Debt Interest Service 12,694,712 12,768,332 13,136,717 13,684,563 12,896,052 11,998,197 12,530,366 11,476,956 10,381,793 9,187,217 (1) Includes all governmental fund types Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports $ 23,379,723 $ 24,376,618 25,208,531 73,615,177 30,525,757 30,527,304 35,009,210 35,545,895 35,555,285 35,477,217 Total General Governmental Expenditures (1) 121,466,505 134,797,438 133,618,790 182,649,422 121,146,255 132,451,247 152,423,393 169,794,993 216,393,202 204,932,600 Ratio of Debt Service to General Governmental Expenditures 19.2% 18.1% 18.9% 40.3% 25.2% 23.0% 23.0% 20.9% 16.4% 17.3% • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Miscellaneous Statistical Information June 30, 2004 Date Organized: Form of Government: Number of Commissioners: Number of Employees: County of Operations and Geographical Location: Fiscal Year: Type of Tax Support: Debt rating: Number of Call Boxes in County: Number of Calls Made from Call Boxes: Freeway Service Patrol Vehicles: Number of Vehicles Assisted by Freeway Service Patrol: Commuter Rail Stations: Commuter Rail Service: 1976 County Transportation Commission Board of Commissioners with full-time Executive Director 30 including one non -voting state representative 25 budgeted full-time positions Riverside County, California Riverside County is bordered on the north by San Bernardino County, on the east by the state of Arizona, on the south by San Diego and Imperial Counties and on the west by Orange and Los Angeles Counties. The County encompasses 7,177 square miles and is the fourth largest by area in the state. It stretches 185 miles from the Arizona border to within 20 miles of the Pacific Ocean. July 1 - June 30 1/2% of local sales tax for Measure A 1/4% of statewide sales tax for Local Transportation Fund Sales tax on gasoline allocation for State Transit Assistance AA/Aa2 1,159 of which 1,083 are active 23,713 15 32,564 5 (Riverside Downtown, Pedley, La Sierra, North Main Corona, and West Corona) 12 Trips each weekday on the Riverside County Line 12 Trips each weekday on the Inland Empire — Orange County Line (IEOC) 9 Trips each weekday on the 91 Line Number of Club Ride Members: 1,756 6097 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor • P.O. Box 12008 • Riverside, CA 92502-2208 (951) 787-7141 • Fax (951) 787-7920 www.rctc.org 98 RECORDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 2, 2004 TO: Staff FROM: Jennifer Harmon SUBJECT: Additional Attachment to Agenda Item No. 6C, "Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Commission Audit Results" Attachment pages to the above -noted agenda item were inadvertently left out of the agenda packet. Please insert them following Page 98. Sorry for the inconvenience. Attachment • Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Financial and Compliance Report June 30, 2004 • McGladrey& Pullen Certified Public Accountants McGladrey & Pullen, uP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. • Contents Independent Auditor's Report on the Financial Statements and Supplementary Information 1 Financial Statements Balance sheet 3 Statement of revenues, expenditures and change in fund balance 4 Notes to financial statements 5 • • Supplementary Information Schedule of allocations and disbursements 8 Schedule of unclaimed apportionments (articles 4 and 8) 9 Schedule of unclaimed apportionments (article 3) 10 Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards 11 Schedule of Transportation Development Act Compliance Findings and Questioned Costs 12 Schedule of Transportation Development Act Compliance Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs 13 986 McGladrey & Pullen • • • Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on the Financial Statements and Supplementary Information Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside, as administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Commission's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Local Transportation Fund and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the Commission or the County of Riverside, California, as of June 30, 2004, and the respective changes in its financial position, where applicable, for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside, as administered by the Commission, as of June 30, 2004, and the respective changes in financial position, where applicable, thereof for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Commission determined that the Local Transportation Fund should be classified as a governmental fund instead of a fiduciary fund, as reported in the June 30, 2003 financial statements, because some of the assets in the Local Transportation Fund could be used for the Commission's commuter rail program. As a result of the reclassification, the Local Transportation Fund is presented as a governmental fund. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated October 13, 2004 on our consideration of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 1 98C The Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside has not presented a Management's Discussion and Analysis required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34 that the GASB has determined is necessary to supplement, although not required to be a part of, the financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed in the table of contents as supplementary information are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the financial statements of the Local Transportation Fund. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Riverside, California October 13, 2004 2 • • • 98D • Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Balance Sheet June 30, 2004 Assets Cash and investments with County Treasurer Accounts receivable Interest receivable Prepaid allocations Total assets Fund Balance $ 25,322,320 11,497,887 73,045 5,700,000 $ 42,593,252 Reserved Allocated and unclaimed apportionments $ 18,220,322 Bicycle and pedestrian projects 1,178,538 Prepaid allocations 5,700,000 Transportation program 11,497,887 Unapportioned carryover 5,490,333 Unreserved and designated for bicycles and pedestrians 506,172 Total fund balance $ 42,593,252 II See Notes to Financial Statements. • 3 98E Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Change in Fund Balance Year Ended June 30, 2004 Revenues: Sales taxes $ 58,421,527 Interest 180,741 Total revenues 58,602,268 Expenditures, disbursements to claimants 50,304,661 Excess of revenues over expenditures and change in fund balance 8,297,607 Fund balance: Beginning of year End of year See Notes to Financial Statements. 4 34,295,645 $ 42,593,252 • • • 98F Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Notes to Financial Statements Note 1. Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies The Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), in its capacity as the transportation planning commission for the County of Riverside, California, (County) is responsible for administering funds provided through the Local Transportation Fund (Fund), which was created in accordance with the provisions of the Transportation Development Act of 1972. The significant revenue to the Fund is derived from one-fourth of one percent of the seven and one quarter percent statewide sales tax collected in the County by the State Board of Equalization. The accounting policies of the Commission conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as applicable to governmental units. A summary of the Commission's significant accounting policies is as follows: Presentation: The accompanying financial statements of the Fund are intended to present the financial position and the changes in financial position of only that portion of the governmental activities of the Commission that is attributable to the transactions of the Local Transportation Fund of the Commission. They do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the Commission as of June 30, 2004, and the changes in its financial position, where applicable, for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In prior years, the Fund was accounted for as a private -purpose trust fund; however, it was determined that some of the resources accumulated were available to the Commission for its commuter rail operations and, therefore, could be used to support the Commission's own programs. Accordingly, the Fund was classified from a fiduciary fund to a governmental fund in fiscal 2004. Basis of accounting: The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed in the Fund. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures are recorded when they are expected to be liquidated with expendable available resources, and revenue is recorded when it becomes both measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined, and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Funding: There is a three -step process for obtaining funds from the Fund: apportionment, allocation, and payment. Annually, the Commission determines each area's share of the anticipated Fund. This share is the area apportionment. Once funds are apportioned to a given area, they are typically available only for allocation to claimants in that area. Allocation is the discretionary action by the Commission which designates funds for a specific claimant for a specific purpose. Payment is authorized by disbursement instructions issued by the Commission. Expenditures: Expenditures represent disbursements to the Commission, Southern California Association of Governments, cities, the County, and transit operators that have met the claimant eligibility requirements to receive Fund monies per various Public Utilities Code Sections. All disbursements are to be used for transportation purposes. Disbursements for subsequent year allocations are recorded as prepaid allocations. 5 98G Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements Note 2. Cash and Investments with County Treasurer The funds in the County Treasury are pooled with those of other entities in the County and invested in accordance with the County's investment policy. These pooled funds are carried at fair value. Fair value is based on quoted market prices and/or direct bids, when needed, from government dealers on some variable or floating rate items. Moneys in the Fund are legally required to be deposited in the County Treasury pool. An Investment Oversight Committee has been established by the County, which acts as a regulator of the pool. Note 3. Fund Balance Reserves for the Fund represent the unclaimed apportionments related to claims for transit programs, the unexpired allocations available for bicycle and pedestrian projects, earned but not received revenues for transportation programs, unapportioned carryover, and prepaid transit allocations. Expired allocations related to bicycle and pedestrian projects are unreserved and designated. At June 30, 2004, amounts reserved are allocated as follows: Transit —allocated and unclaimed apportionments reserved for: Western County: Commuter rail: Allocated and unclaimed Apportioned and unallocated Bus transit: City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Corona Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Apportioned and unallocated Total rail and bus transit —Western County Coachella Valley apportioned and unallocated Palo Verde Valley, transit Total rail and bus transit reserved for allocated and unclaimed apportionments $ 250,000 10,067,152 161,442 140,320 77,000 3,525,197 3,794,531 18,015,642 143,558 61,122 $ 18,220,322 Bicycle and pedestrian projects: Reserved for allocated amounts $ 1,178,538 Unreserved and designated for unallocated amounts 506,172 Total bicycle and pedestrian projects $ 1,684,710 Reserved for prepaid allocations Reserved for transportation program Reserved for unapportioned carryover $ 5,700,000 $ 11,497,887 $ 5,490,333 6 98H Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements Note 4. Commitments The RTA and the SunLine Transit Agency (STA) (collectively, the Agencies), major transit providers for the County, obtained available lease financing for bus acquisitions through the proceeds from certificates of participation issued by the California Transit Finance Corporation (Corporation) for each agency. Local transportation funds, to the extent of the Agencies' eligible share, along with other federal and state funds, were pledged as support for the Agencies' lease payments to the Corporation. For the year ended June 30, 2004, there were no Fund amounts expended for lease payments. 7 981 • Supplementary Information • • 98J • • • Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Allocations and Disbursements Year Ended June 30, 2004 SB 821 Article 3 Article 4 Article 8 Article 3 Planning, Program ming and Administrative Totals Allocations Disbursements Allocations Disbursements Allocations Disburse ments Allocations Disbursements Allocations Disbursements Unclai med A mount Expenditures: City of Banning $ 237,000 $ 129,480 $ 792,585 $ 683,263 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,029,585 $ 812,743 $ 216,842 City of Beaumont - - 935,000 820,000 935,000 820,000 115,000 City of Blythe 29,900 29,900 29,900 City of Cathedral City 60,000 - 60,000 60,000 City of Corona 294,782 252,090 1,130,099 1,053,099 1,424,881 1,305,189 119,692 City of Hemet 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 - City of LaQuinta 52,887 - 52,887 - 52,887 City of Moreno Valley 99,945 42,425 99,945 42,425 57,520 City of Murrieta 88,000 88,000 - 88,000 88,000 - CO City of Palm Desert 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 W City of Palm Springs 89,339 16,672 - - - 89,339 16,672 72,667 City of Perris 155,000 70,000 155,000 70,000 85,000 City of Riverside 461,330 193,471 1,636,330 1,636,330 - - - 2,097,660 1,829,801 267,859 City of San Jacinto 127,000 75,000 - - 127,000 75,000 52,000 City of Temecula 100,000 - - - 100,000 100,000 County of Riverside: Auditor/Controller 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Road Department 355,000 - - 355,000 - 355,000 Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 851,710 851,710 - 851,710 851,710 - Comm ission 5,755,543 5,505,543 2,306,968 2,306,968 8,062,511 7,812,511 250,000 Riverside Transit Agency - 26,518,331 26,371,331 - - - 26,518,331 26,371,331 147,000 SCAG - - 105,300 105,300 105,300 105,300 SunLine Transit Agency 10,031,979 10,031,979 - - 10,031,979 10,031,979 Total expenditures 2,260,183 927,138 47,651,577 46,953,255 2,424,268 2,424,268 52,336,028 50,304,661 2,031,367 Prepaid allocations: Riverside Transit Agency 4,300,000 4,300,000 - - 4,300,000 4,300,000 SunLine Transit Agency - 1,400,000 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000 1,400,000 Total prepaid allocations 5,700,000 5,700,000 - 5,700,000 5,700,000 Total $ 2,260,183 $ 927,138 $ 53,351,577 $ 52,653,255 $ - $ $ 2,424,268 $ 2,424,268 $ 58,036,028 $ 56,004,661 $ 2,031,367 8 Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Unclaimed Apportionments (Articles 4 and 8) Year Ended June 30, 2004 Total Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Prior Fiscal Year Unclaimed Amount Unclaimed Amount Unclaimed Interest Apportionment Apportionment Claimed Apportionment Apportionment Claimed Apportionment Allocation June 30, 2004 Transportation: Western County: Rail $ 7,849,407 $ 5,505,543 $ 2,343,864 $ 7,875,686 $ - $ 7,875,686 $ 97,602 $ 10,317,152 Bus 31,397,630 30,196,318 1,201,312 11,099,630 4,667,705 6,431,925 65,253 7,698,490 Coachella Valley 10,716,826 10,031,979 684,847 857,353 1,400,000 (542,647) 1,358 143,558 Palo Verde Valley: Transit 850,061 851,710 (1,649) 15,491 (46,702) 62,193 578 61,122 Local streets and roads 42,950 42,950 Unallocated 3,752 3,752 c9 Total transportation 50,813,924 46,585,550 4,228,374 19,894,862 6,067,705 13,827,157 164,791 18,220,322 co r Administration and planning: Auditor/Controller 12,000 12,000 Commission adm inistration 756,657 756,657 Commission planning 1,550,311 1,550,311 SCAG planning 105,300 105,300 (300) (300) Total administration and planning 2,424,268 2,424,268 (300) (300) Total apportionments $ 53,238,192 $ 49,009,818 $ 4,228,374 $ 19,894,562 $ 6,067,405 $ 13,827,157 $ 164,791 $ 18,220,322 • • • • • • Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Unclaimed Apportionments (Article 3) Year Ended June 30, 2004 Unclaimed Unclaimed Apportionment Interest Apportionment July 1, 2003 Apportionment Disbursement Allocations June 30, 2004 Bicycle and pedestrian projects $ 1,558,889 $ 1,037,019 $ 927,138 $ 15,940 $ 1,684,710 10 98M McGladrey& Pullen • Riverside, California October 13, 2004 Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have audited the financial statements of the Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside, as administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, and have issued our report thereon dated October 13, 2004. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Commission's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Commission's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. This included those provisions of laws and regulations identified in the Transportation Development Act of 1972, as amended, and corresponding regulations of the California Government Code. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the management of the Commission, the Board of Commissioners and the Department of Transportation of the State of California, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. //_ L e —,c) McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 11 98N Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Schedule of Transportation Development Act Compliance Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2004 There are no current year audit findings to report. 12 980 Local Transportation Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Transportation Development Act Compliance Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2004 CF #2003-01—SunLine Transit Agency Conditions: The SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) is an enterprise fund of the SunLine Joint Powers Transportation Agency (SunLine JPA), the primary government. The SunLine JPA is a stand-alone government that was originally formed by the County of Riverside and the cities in the Coachella Valley to provide local and regional transportation services in the Coachella Valley. An audit of SunLine's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 revealed two findings related to TDA funding. The first finding reported that SunLine advanced $751,000 in TDA funding, which is restricted to transit purposes only, to its affiliate, SunLine Services Group (SSG), which did not have sufficient cash flow to repay SunLine in the current period. SunLine pays administrative expenses for allocated salaries and benefits on behalf of SSG. SSG's funding comes primarily from contracts that pay on a reimbursement basis for SSG's services. SSG did not have sufficient cash flows to reimburse SunLine in the current period and, therefore, SunLine reserved $751,000 as a potential bad debt. SunLine proposed to request that its funding agencies allow a transfer of certain transit related equipment from SSG to SunLine to recover a substantial portion of the unpaid receivable. The second finding reported that SunLine secured a loan from a bank for the benefit of its affiliate, SSG. SunLine agreed to provide financing for its affiliate, SSG, in connection with a program to provide CNG vehicles to the taxi industry. SSG purchased 45 CNG taxicabs to sell through a capital lease program to private taxicab operators. SSG did not have sufficient creditworthiness to obtain a bank loan to purchase the cabs. SunLine borrowed the funds on behalf of SSG. Although the finding does not result in questioned costs, the loan encumbers funds restricted for transit use only. Current status: On July 14, 2004, the Commission took action to approve the transfer of assets valued at $1,142,000 from SSG to SunLine in consideration of SSG's outstanding debt to SunLine. Additionally, it approved a one-year progress review of SunLine's operations and a skills assessment of SunLine's employees. The matter regarding SunLine's securing a loan from a bank for the benefit of SSG has not been resolved. Management is assessing the situation. 13 98P • State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Financial and Compliance Report June 30, 2004 McGladrey& Pullen Certified Public Accountants McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 98Q • Contents • • Independent Auditor's Report on the Financial Statements and Supplementary Information 1 Financial Statements Balance sheet 3 Statement of revenues, expenditures and change in fund balance 4 Notes to financial statements 5 Supplementary Information Schedule of allocations and disbursements approved during the year 7 Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards 8 98R McGladrey& Pullen • Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on the Financial Statements and Supplementary Information Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside, as administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Commission's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the State Transit Assistance Fund and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the Commission or the County of Riverside, California, as of June 30, 2004, and the respective changes in its financial position, where applicable, for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside, as administered by the Commission, as of June 30, 2004, and the respective changes in financial position, where applicable, thereof for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated October 13, 2004 on our consideration of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of intemal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside has not presented a Management's Discussion and Analysis required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34 that the GASB has determined is necessary to supplement, although not required to be a part of, the financial statements. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 1 98S Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule of allocations and disbursements approved during the year, listed in the table of contents as supplementary information, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of the State Transit Assistance Fund. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. //,e-eee...c, ee-t- Riverside, California October 13, 2004 • 2 98T State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Balance Sheet June 30, 2004 Assets Cash and investments with County Treasurer $ 1,990,790 State allocation receivable 737,071 Interest receivable 3,859 Total assets $ 2,731,720 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities Accounts payable $ 1,724 Due to other Commission funds 163,372 Total liabilities 165,096 Fund Balance Reserved for allocations available for programming Reserved for unclaimed allocations Total fund balance Total liabilities and fund balance See Notes to Financial Statements. 1,267,159 1,299,465 2,566,624 $ 2,731,720 3 98U State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Change in Fund Balance Year Ended June 30, 2004 Revenues: Sales taxes $ 2,899,065 Interest 25,784 Total revenues 2,924,849 Expenditures, disbursements to claimants 1,958,571 Excess of revenues over expenditures and change in fund balance 966,278 Fund balance Beginning of year End of year See Notes to Financial Statements. 4 1,600,346 $ 2,566,624 98V • • • State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements Note 1. Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies The Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), in its capacity as the transportation planning commission for the County of Riverside, California, (County) is responsible for administering funds provided through the State Transit Assistance Program, which was created in 1979 under Chapter 161 (SB 620) of the California statutes to provide a second source of Transportation Development Act funding for the development of transit systems. The funds are derived from fuel sales tax revenue and are budgeted through legislation and appropriated to the State Controller's Office for allocation to local agencies. The accounting policies of the Commission conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as applicable to governmental units. A summary of the Commission's significant accounting policies is as follows: Presentation: The accompanying financial statements of the State Transit Assistance Fund (Fund) are intended to present the financial position and the changes in financial position of only that portion of the governmental activities of the Commission that is attributable to the transactions of the Fund of the Commission. They do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the Commission as of June 30, 2004, and the changes in its financial position, where applicable, for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Basis of accounting: The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed in the Fund. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures are recorded when they are expected to be liquidated with expendable available resources, and revenue is recorded when it becomes both measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined, and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Allocations to local agencies: State transit assistance funds are allocated to the operators within the County. Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99313 allocates funds to regional transportation planning agencies based on the ratio of area population to state population. PUC Section 99314 allocates funds to public operators based on their share of fares and local support to other operators in the state. The allocations must be made in a resolution adopted by the Commission. Cash: It is the Commission's policy to deposit all funds received with the County Tax Collector -Treasurer for investment until the funds are required for disbursement. Interest income is earned while these funds are deposited. Fund balance reservations: The unpaid current allocations represent amounts allocated and due to claimants but not yet paid. Disbursements to claimants: Disbursements to claimants represent funds disbursed to transit operators that have met the eligibility requirements to receive State Transit Assistance Program funds per PUC Sections 99313 to 99314. All disbursements are to be used for transit purposes. 5 98W State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission Notes to Financial Statements Note 2. Cash and Investments The funds in the County Treasury are pooled with those of other entities in the County and invested in accordance with the County's investment policy. These pooled funds are carried at fair value. Fair value is based on quoted market prices and/or direct bids, when needed, from government dealers on some variable or floating rate items. The Commission is a voluntary participant in the pool. An Investment Oversight Committee has been established by the County, which acts as a regulator of the pool. Note 3. Fund Balance Reserved fund balance for the Fund represents the unclaimed apportionment related to claims for transit. At June 30, 2004, amounts reserved are as follows: Reserved for allocations available for programming: Western County: City of Banning $ 14,687 City of Beaumont 1,293 City of Corona 2,896 City of Riverside 4,068 Commuter rail 412,074 Bus transit 717,996 Coachella Valley 70,849 Palo Verde Valley 43,296 1,267,159 Reserved for unclaimed allocations: Western County: Commuter rail 163,372 Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) 521,770 Coachella Valley: SunLine Transit Agency (STA) 614,323 1,299,465 Total fund balance $ 2,566,624 Note 4. Commitments The RTA and the STA (collectively, the Agencies), major transit providers for the County, obtained available lease financing for bus acquisitions through the proceeds from certificates of participation issued by the California Transit Finance Corporation (Corporation) for each agency. State transit assistance funds, to the extent of the Agencies' eligible share, along with other federal and state funds were pledged as support for the Agencies' lease payments to the Corporation. For the year ended June 30, 2004, Fund revenues of $320,000 and $100,200 were expended for lease payments by RTA and STA, respectively. 6 98X • Supplementary Information • 98Y State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside as Administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Schedule of Allocations and Disbursements Approved During the Year Year Ended June 30, 2004 California Code of Regulations Amount Amount Section No. Recipient Allocated Disbursed Reference Western County: City of Banning $ 27,400 $ 27,400 6731 City of Corona 48,000 48,000 6731 City of Riverside 28,190 23,857 6731 Riverside Transit Agency 872,000 393,921 6730 Commission Commuter Rail Program 314,616 477,988 6730 Total Western County 1,290,206 971,166 SunLine Transit Agency 963,875 763,875 6730 Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 223,200 223,200 6730 Other - 330 $ 2,477,281 $ 1,958,571 7 98Z McGladrey& Pullen • Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have audited the financial statements of the State Transit Assistance Fund of the County of Riverside, as administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, and have issued our report thereon dated October 13, 2004. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Commission's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Commission's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. This included those provisions of laws and regulations identified in the Transportation Development Act of 1972, as amended, and corresponding regulations of the California Government Code. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management of the Commission, the Board of Commissioners and the Department of Transportation of the State of California, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. /"A-eeez.e._ Riverside, California October 13, 2004 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 8 98AA • Riverside County Transportation Commission Compliance Reports June 30, 2004 • McGladrey& Pullen Certified Public Accountants • McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 98BB • Contents Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 1 Note to schedule of expenditures of federal awards 2 Independent Auditor's Report on: Internal control over financial reporting and on compliance and other matters based on an audit of financial statements performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards Compliance with requirements applicable to each major program and on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards 3 4 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 6 Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings 8 Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2004 Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Program Title U.S. Department of Transportation: Highway Research, Planning and Construction Program Pass -through State Department of Transportation: Pedley Station Security Enhancement Pedley Station Platform Extension SR 60 from 1215 to Redlands HOV Lanes Callbox Traffic Monitor Cajalco/Ramona Corridor Pass -through San Bernardino Associated Governments: Rideshare Programs Regional Ridematching Pass -through Southern California Association of Governments: Cajalco/Ramona Corridor Pass -through Orange County Transportation Authority: Regional Ridematching Pass -through Ventura County Transportation Commission: Regional Ridematching Federal Transit Administration, Formula Grants: Direct program: N. Main Corona and La Sierra Parking Expansion Pass -through Riverside Transit Agency: Perris Multimodal Total expenditures of federal awards * Denotes major program See Note to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 20.205* 20.205 * 20.205 * 20.205 * 20.205 * 20.205* 20.205* 20.205 * 20.205 * 20.205 * Pass -through Entity Identifying Number/ Grant Number CML-6054 (024) STPL-6054 (022) CMLN-6054 (016) RPSTPL-6054 (018) CETAP03-6054(037) 01-41-003 03-41-003 04-65-046 03-41-074 03-41-075 20.507 CA -90-Y182-00 20.500 M23-001 Federal Expenditures $ 177,443 162,350 15,475,198 660,610 500,000 871,097 25,906 175,966 161,963 102,439 18,312,972 182,616 92,296 274,912 $ 18,587,884 1 98DD Riverside County Transportation Commission Note to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal award programs of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission). The Schedule includes federal awards received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards passed through other agencies. The Commission's reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the Commission's basic financial statements. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Commission, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position of the Commission. The accompanying Schedule is presented on the modified -accrual basis of accounting. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. 2 98EE McGladrey& Pullen • Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated October 13, 2004. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Commission's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Commission's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended for the information of the Board of Commissioners, management, federal awarding agencies and pass -through entities, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. Riverside, California October 13, 2004 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 3 98FF McGladrey& Pullen • Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California Compliance We have audited the compliance of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2004. The Commission's major federal program is identified in the summary of the independent auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to its major federal program is the responsibility of the Commission's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Commission's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non - Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Commission's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on the Commission's compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the Commission complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2004. Internal Control over Compliance The management of the Commission is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Commission's internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM Intemational, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 4 98GG Our consideration of the internal control over compliance would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that noncompliance with applicable requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants caused by error or fraud that would be material in relation to a major federal program being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over compliance and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Commission as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated October 13, 2004. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by U.S. OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations, and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. This report is intended for the information of the Commission's management, Board of Commissioners, federal awarding agencies and pass -through entities, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. /,ogee G e---/' Riverside, California October 13, 2004 5 • 98HH Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2004 I. Summary of Independent Auditor's Results Financial Statements Type of auditor's report issued: Unqualified Internal control over financial reporting: • Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No • Reportable condition(s) identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None Reported Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Yes X No Federal Awards Internal control over major program: • Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No • Reportable condition(s) identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None Reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major programs: Unqualified • Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Section 510(a) of OMB Circular A-133? Yes X No Identification of major program: CFDA Number Name of Federal Program Amount Expended 20.205 Highway Research, Planning and Construction Program Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type B programs: $ 557,636 Auditee qualified as low -risk auditee? X Yes No $ 18,312,972 Riverside County Transportation Commission Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2004 II. Findings Related to the Financial Statement Audit as Required to be Reported in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards A. Reportable Conditions None reported. B. Compliance Findings None reported. III. Findings and Questioned Costs for Federal Awards A. Reportable Condition None reported. B. Compliance Findings None reported. 7 98JJ Riverside County Transportation Commission • • Summary Schedule of Prior Year Audit Findings Year Ended June 30, 2004 There were no audit findings reported for the year ended June 30, 2003. 8 98KK McGladrey& Pullen • • • Certified Public Accountants Independent Accountant's Report on Applying Agreed -upon Procedures Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California We have performed the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying Appropriations Limit Calculation of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) for the year ended June 30, 2004. These procedures, which were agreed to by the Commission and the League of California Cities (as presented in the publication entitled Agreed -upon Procedures Applied to the Appropriations Limitation Prescribed by Article XIII-B of the California Constitution), were performed solely to assist the Commission in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. The Commission's management is responsible for the Appropriations Limit Calculation. This agreed -upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in this report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. The procedures performed and our findings were as follows: 1. We obtained the completed internal calculations and compared the limit and annual adjustment factors included in those calculations to the limit and annual adjustment factors that were adopted by a resolution of the Board of Commissioners. We also compared the population and inflation options included in the aforementioned calculations to those that were selected by a recorded vote of the Board of Commissioners. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit Calculation, we added line A, last year's limit, to line E, total adjustments, and compared the resulting amount to line F, this year's limit. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 3. We compared the current year information presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit Calculation to the supporting calculations described in item 1 above. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 4. We compared the prior year Appropriations Limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit Calculation to the prior year Appropriations Limit adopted by the Board of Commissioners during the prior year. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. We were not engaged to and did not conduct an examination, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Appropriations Limit Calculation of the Commission. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. No procedures have been performed with respect to the determination of the appropriation limit for the base year, as defined by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 1 98LL This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Commissioners and management of the Commission and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited. /,,e-eeez.e_, Riverside, California October 13, 2004 2 • 98MM Riverside County Transportation Commission • Appropriations Limit Calculation Year Ended June 30, 2004 Amount Source A. Last Year's Limit $ 203,148,540 • • B. Adjustment Factors: 1. Population change 2. Per capita change Total adjustment [(B.1. x B.2.) -1.0] C. Annual Adjustment D. Other Adjustments: 1. Lost responsibility (-) 2. Transfer to private (-) 3. Transfer to fees (-) 4. Assumed responsibility (+) Subtotal E. Total Adjustments 1.0365 1.0074 0.0442 State Finance State Finance 8,973,090 (BxA) 8,973,090 (C+D) F. This Year's Limit $ 212,121,630 (A+E) 3 98NN McGladrey& Pullen • • • Certified Public Accountants Independent Accountant's Report on Applying Agreed -upon Procedures Board of Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission and Board of Directors Inland Transportation Services Riverside, California We have performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) and Inland Transportation Services (ITS), solely to assist the specified parties with respect to the purchase of gift certificates or coupon incentives and the payment of incentives related to the Commuter Assistance Program (Program) administered by ITS for the year ended June 30, 2004. This agreed - upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in this report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. As background information for this engagement to perform agreed -upon procedures, we were provided with: Resolution No. 03-025, Resolution of the Commission Amending Guidelines for the Administration of the Measure A Funded Commuter Incentive Projects as part of its Program, and Agreement No. 04-41-020, Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement for Development and Management of Commuter Assistance between ITS and the Commission, entered into as of July 1, 2003. In addition, we received an explanation of the ITS registration process with the employer and employee from the program manager of ITS. The procedures and related findings are as follows: 1. We obtained a list of all disbursements recorded by the Commission to vendors for the purchase of gift certificates or coupon incentives for the year ended June 30, 2004 and judgmentally selected a sample of 10 disbursements for selected testing (see Exhibit 1). Our procedures and findings related to Exhibit 1 are as follows: a. We agreed the amount recorded as disbursed by the Commission to canceled checks or warrants, without exception. b. We agreed the amount recorded as disbursed to ITS to check requests, without exception. c. We agreed the amount recorded and the payee to the log of requested gift certificates maintained by ITS, without exception. 2. We obtained the rideshare payment reports that list recorded disbursements made to recipients by ITS for the year ended June 30, 2004 and judgmentally selected a sample of 10 items for selected testing (see Exhibit 2). Our selected testing and findings related to Exhibit 2 were as follows: a. We obtained the employer information form and statement of participation (SOP) for the employer, indicating their participation with ITS as a participant. No exceptions were noted. b. We obtained the employee enrollment form, indicating the employee is registered with ITS as a participant. No exceptions were noted. McGladrey & Pullen, Lo. is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 1 9800 c. We agreed ITS' disbursement to the employee claim form, noting proper approval of the claim, without exception. d. We recalculated the number of days the employee participated in each rideshare mode and the incentive earned for each rideshare mode and agreed those totals to the amounts listed on the monthly incentive claim form, without exception. e. We agreed the daily amount of reimbursement per mode of transportation to the amount approved in the SOP, without exception. f. We agreed the recorded disbursement amount per the incentive payment report to the employer transmittal letter, without exception. 3. We compared ITS' total gift certificate inventory balance as of June 30, 2004, from gift certificate inventory schedules provided by ITS, to the actual gift certificates maintained by ITS by judgmentally selecting certain gift certificates for recounting. The gift certificate inventory balance per the inventory schedules as of June 30, 2004 is $57,480. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. We were not engaged to, and did not, conduct an examination, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the specified elements, accounts or items thereof. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Commissioners and management of Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Board of Directors and management of Inland Transportation Services, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. Riverside, California October 13, 2004 • • • 2 98PP Exhibit 1 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission and Inland Transportation Services (Contractor) Schedule of Selected Purchases of Gift Certificates and Coupons by the Contractor Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 Project # Vendor Voucher Date Amount Payment Voucher # P2101 Home Depot 02/12/04 $ 2,500 25969 P2101 Galleria 12/23/03 5,000 25455 P2101 Stater Bros' 09/09/03 3,000 24375 P2102 Home Depot 02/12/04 2,500 25969 P2102 Stater Bros' 03/18/04 10,000 26294 P2110 Ontario Mills 12/23/03 5,000 25480 P2110 Stater Bros' 09/09/03 3,000 24354 P2111 Stater Bros' 12/23/03 10,000 25468 P2111 Stater Bros' 06/03/04 12,000 27022 P2111 Ontario Mills 03/18/04 15,000 26300 3 98QQ Exhibit 2 Riverside County Transportation Commission and Inland Transportation Services (Contractor) Schedule of Selected Employee Incentive Payments Made by the Contractor Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 Employee Initials Employer Name M.P P.B. J.Y. T.P. R. P. S.S. A.P. D.N. V.S. R.A Shea —Kenny JV County of San Bernardino ESRI—New York Street Citi Cards The Boeing Company K & N Engineering Rutan & Tucker, LLP Harbor -UCLA Medical Center Watson Pharmaceuticals Starcrest Products of California, Inc. Incentive Type Home Depot Ontario Mills Ontario Mills Ontario Mills Home Depot Stater Bros' Galleria Galleria Galleria Stater Bros' Commute Mode Carpool Carpool Public Bus Carpool Carpool Carpool Commuter Rail Vanpool Carpool Carpool Disbursement Date Amount 02/26/04 $ 114 06/17/04 136 11/21/03 152 09/23/03 112 08/14/03 126 05/25/04 128 12/04/03 112 05/20/04 128 01/19/04 134 10/07/03 148 4 98RR McGladrey & Pullen • Certified Public Accountants November 22, 2004 To the Audit Ad Hoc Committee of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California This letter is intended to inform the Audit Ad Hoc Committee about significant matters related to the conduct of the annual audit so it can appropriately discharge its oversight responsibility and that we comply with our professional responsibilities to the Audit Ad Hoc Committee. The following summarizes various matters which must be communicated to you under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. The Auditor's Responsibility under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States of America Our audit of the financial statements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) for the year ended June 30, 2004 was conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; the provisions of the Single Audit Act, OMB Circular A-133 and OMB's Compliance Supplement; the Transportation Development Act of 1972, as amended; and corresponding regulations of the California Government Code. Those standards, circulars, regulations and the supplement require we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error, fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of assets. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Accordingly, the audit was designed to obtain reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance about the financial statements. We believe our audit accomplished that objective. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also performed tests of controls and compliance with laws and regulations that contribute to the evidence supporting our opinion on the financial statements. However, these tests do not provide a basis for opinion on the Commission's internal control or compliance with laws and regulations. Management Judgments and Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the preparation of financial statements and are based upon management's current judgment. The process used by management encompasses its knowledge and experience about past and current events and certain assumptions about future events. Management has informed us that it used all the relevant facts available at the time to make the best judgments about accounting estimates, and we considered this information in the scope of our audit. Estimates significant to the financial statements include the valuation of vacant land acquired and the useful lives of capital assets. The Audit Ad Hoc Committee may wish to monitor throughout the year the process used to compute and record these accounting estimates. Audit Adjustments There was one audit reclassification made to the original trial balance presented to us to begin our audit. The reclassification was to reduce prepaid assets and accounts payable. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. 98SS Riverside County Transportation Commission November 22, 2004 Page 2 Uncorrected Misstatements We also considered the effect of two uncorrected misstatements noted from the prior year recorded in the current year, which were discussed with management in the prior year and were determined by management to be immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the opinion units of the financial statements. These adjustments were made to the current year financial statements and their effect on the current year financial statements are summarized in the accompanying schedule. Accounting Policies and Alternative Treatments Management and the Audit Ad Hoc Committee have the ultimate responsibility for the appropriateness of the accounting policies used by the Commission. Following is a description of significant accounting policies or their application which were either initially selected or changed during the year: The Commission has changed the availability criteria from 90 days to 180 days for the recognition of revenue in the governmental funds. This change was made to be consistent with the manner in which the Commission budgets revenues for the fiscal year. This change had no material effect on the financial statements. During the fiscal year, the Commission determined that the Local Transportation Fund (the Fund) should be classified as a governmental fund instead of as a fiduciary fund because some of the assets in the Fund were available to the Commission for its commuter rail operations and, therefore, could be used to support the Commission's own program. As a result of the reclassification, the beginning balance of net assets for governmental activities in the statement of activities and of the fund balance for the govemmental funds in the Fund's financial statements increased by $34,295,645. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 40, Deposit and Investment Risk Disclosures, issued in March 2003, was early adopted by the Commission. This Statement establishes and modifies disclosure requirements related to investment risks related to credit risk, concentration of credit risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. As an element of interest rate risk, this Statement requires certain disclosures of investments that have fair values that are highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. This Statement also establishes and modifies disclosure requirements for deposit risks. Accordingly, certain footnote disclosures have been revised to conform to the provisions of the Statement. GASB Statement No. 44, Economic Condition Reporting: The Statistical Section, issued in May 2004, was also adopted by the Commission. This Statement amends portions of previous guidance related to the preparation of the statistical section presented as part of the comprehensive annual financial report. Accordingly, the statistical section has been revised to conform to the provisions of this Statement. In addition, the GASB has issued certain new pronouncements, which follow, that will/may impact the Commission's accounting policies in the future: GASB Statement No. 42, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Impairment of Capital Assets and for Insurance Recoveries, will be effective for the Commission beginning with its year ending June 30, 2005. This Statement requires governments to report the effects of capital asset impairment in their financial statements when it occurs and requires all governments to account for insurance recoveries in the same manner. GASB Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, will be effective for the Commission beginning with its year ending June 30, 2008. This Statement establishes standards for the measurement, recognition and display of OPEB expense/expenditures and related liabilities (assets), note disclosures and, if applicable, required supplementary information in the financial reports of state and local governmental employers. 98TT • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission November 22, 2004 Page 3 The Commission's management has not yet determined the effect these Statements will have on the Commission's financial statements. We did not identify any significant or unusual transactions or significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements We are not aware of any other documents that contain the audited basic financial statements. If such documents were to be published, we would have a responsibility to determine that such financial information was not materially inconsistent with the audited statements of the Commission. Disagreements with Management We encountered no disagreements with management over the application of significant accounting principles, the basis for management's judgments on any significant matters, the scope of the audit or significant disclosures to be included in the financial statements. Consultations with Other Accountants We are not aware of any consultations management had with other accountants about accounting or auditing matters. Major Issues Discussed with Management Prior to Retention No major issues were discussed with management prior to our retention to perform the aforementioned audit. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We did not encounter any difficulties in dealing with management related to the performance of the audit. Closing We will be pleased to respond to any questions you have about the foregoing. We appreciate the opportunity to continue to be of service to the Riverside County Transportation Commission. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Audit Ad Hoc Committee, Board of Commissioners and management, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. Riverside, California i Riverside County Transportation Commission Summarized Schedule of Uncorrected Misstatements June 30, 2004 Effect —Increase (Decrease) Description Assets Liabilities Equity Revenue Expenses Carryover Impact from Previous Years Reversing • Understatement of prepaid insurance $ $ $ 190,000 $ - $ 190,000 • Understatement of retention payable - (81,428) - (81,428) Current year income effect Total $ $ - 108,572 $ - $ 108,572 (108,572) $ - 98VV AGENDA ITEM 6D • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 04-019, "Dec/aration of Official Intent of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from Proceeds of Indebtedness" STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 04-019, "Declaration of Official Intent of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from Proceeds of Indebtedness". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: One of the finance goals included in the Fiscal Year 2004-2005 budget is the establishment of a new commercial paper program "to provide advance funding for projects included in the expenditure plan of the approved Measure "A" renewal of 2002." A presentation of a preliminary financing plan was made at the May 7, 2004 Commissioners' Workshop. Based on the current financing plan, the commercial paper program is expected to be established by the end of February 2005. However, some project expenditures related to the new Measure "A" Transportation Improvement Plan may be incurred prior to the issuance of commercial paper. These project expenditures, if any, may be reimbursed from the proceeds of commercial paper subject to the Commission's adoption of a resolution for such reimbursement. Staff is requesting the adoption of this resolution in order to comply with Treasury Regulations. Attachment: Resolution No. 04-019 Agenda Item 6D 99 RESOLUTION NO. 04-019 DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM PROCEEDS OF INDEBTEDNESS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Issuer") intends to acquire, construct, improve certain transportation improvements and facilities as part of the Issuer's Transportation Improvement Plan, and acquire other land in connection with its governmental purposes (collectively, the "Project"); WHEREAS, the Issuer expects to pay certain expenditures (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") in connection with the Project prior to the issuance of indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project on a long-term basis; • WHEREAS, the Issuer reasonably expects that debt obligations in an amount not expected to exceed $200,000,000 will be issued and that certain of the proceeds of such debt obligations will be used to reimburse the Reimbursement Expenditures; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Issuer declares: Section 1. The Issuer finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. This declaration is made solely for purposes of establishing compliance with the requirements of Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations. This declaration does not bind the Issuer to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project. Section 3. The Issuer hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of indebtedness to reimburse itself for Reimbursement Expenditures. 100 • Section 4. This declaration shall take effect from and after its adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission at its meeting on December 8, 2004. Roy Wilson, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission 101 AGENDA ITEM 6E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISS/ON DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the period ended September 30, 2004. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law and Commission policy. Attachment: Quarterly Investment Reports — September 30, 2004 Agenda Item 6E 102 • • • Investment Portfolio Report Period Ending: September 2004 OPERATING FUNDS RATING PAR PURCHASE MATURITY YIELD TO PURCHASE MARKET UNREALIZED MOODYS/FITCH/S&P VALUE DATE DATE MARKET PRICE VALUE GAIN (LOSS) City Nation $ 30,967 A3/BBB+ Cash with i 117,655,334 Aaa-MR1/AAAN+1 Local Ager 2,981,107 Not Rated Agency/Treasury Securities: FNMA 2,020,500 AAA/AAA 2,000,000 03/29/04 03/29/06 2.05 % 2,000,000 2,020,500 20,500 Money Mar 56,482 56,482 1.00% 56,482 56,482 Federal Ho 1,993,760 AAA/AAA 2,000,000 11/12/03 11/15/05 2 .29% 1,993,716 1,993,760 44 FNM A Not( 1,936,604 AAA/AAA 1,950,000 03/17/04 03/17/06 2 .08 % 1,951,066 1,936,604 (14,463) Sub-To ta 126,674,753 $ 6,006,482 $ 6,001,264 $ 6,007,345 $ 6,082 FUNDS HELD IN TRUST Cash w ith County: Local Tran: 27,992,774 Aaa-MR1/AAAN+1 Sub-To ta 27,992,774 INVESTMENT WITH CITIES (1) Maturity Date City of Can 300,000 06/01/09 4.75% City of Lak, 69,930 11/01/04 6.00% Sub-Tota 369,930 COM MISSION BOND PROJECT FUNDS/DEBT RESERVE Milestone f AAA/AAA First Ameri 16,875,557 AAA/AAA U.S. Tress 15,776,672 AAA/AAA First Ameri 983,941 AAA/AAA Sub-Tota 33,636,170 TOTAL $ 188,673,627 15,776,672 SUMMARIZED INVESTMENT TYPE Banks $ 30,967 Cash with County 145,648,107 LAIF 2,981,107 Mutual Funds: First America n Treasury - Trust 17,859,498 Milestone Sub - Total Mutua l Funds 17,859,498 Federal Agency Notes 6,007,345 U. S. Treasury Notes 15,776,672 Investme nt Agreements 369,930 TOTAL 188,673,627 09/01/04 (1) Investment with citie s is reported as a loan receivable for financial reporting purposes . 11/30/04 2. 00% 15,924,819 15,776,672 (148,147) 103 • • • Statement of Compliance All of the above investments and any investment decisions made for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy as adopted on March 10, 2004. The Commission has adequate cash flows for six months of operations. Signed by• Chief Financial Officer September 2004 County Administrative Center Investment Objectives • . . • Safety of Principal Liquidity Public Trust Maximum Rate of Return Portfolio Statistics We. Treasurer's Commentary "Greenspan Strikes" As expected the Fed Funds rate was increased by 25 basis points to 1.75%, which marks the third increase this year. At this juncture, it appears that the Fed will continue its measured pace. We expect another 25 basis point move in November 10th. We also continue to watch the price of oil and it appears to be approaching the 50 dollar a barrel mark once again. The multiple hurri- canes in Florida and the Gulf States have caused shutdowns on oil rigs and refineries, which will not help to bring the price of oil down anytime soon. Benchmark (definition) 1. A standard by which something can be measured or judged. 2. A quantitative gauge in the securities market. 3. The security or index off of which another security's interest rate is based. In our continuing efforts to bring value and reduce fees to our depositors and participants we will be changing our benchmark from the iMoneyNet, Inc, The Money Fund Report/ All Taxable Average to the Treasurer's Institu- tional Money Market Index (TIMMI), which is a composite average from three of the largest investment banking firms. This new benchmark should provide a better mark for us to judge and improve our performance. Our goal for startup is November 2004. Stay tuned for further updates. oe_ a..e.o_e_ Paul McDonnell Treasurer -Tax Collector Durable Goods Orders -for September 24th -0.5% actual vs. -0.3%survey Gross Domestic Product (GDP) -for Sep- tember 29th 3.2% actual vs. 3.0% survey Consumer Confidence— Index -for Septem- ber 28th 96.8 actual vs. 99.5 survey Factory Orders -for March September 2nd 1.5% actual vs. 1.1% survey Unemployment Rate- for September 3rd 5.4% actual vs. 5.5% survey At month's end, the Fed Funds rate was at 1.75%, with a balanced bias. The 2 -year T -Note was yielding 2.6% (down 16 bps.) while the 30 -year T - Bond was yielding 4.88% (down 28 bps.) For August, the Pool had an increase of 10 bps. in average monthly yield. The Pool yield should continue to benefit in yield as matur- ing shorter term securities are rein- vested after the FOMC's expected action on November 10th. September August July June May April Nbnth-End Book Value Nbnth-End Nbrket Value* Paper Gain or (Loss) Percent of Paper Gain or Loss Yield Based Upon Book Value Weighted Average Maturity (Yrs) Nbdified Duration earket values does not include accrued interest 2,829,228,108 ' $ 2,823,994,551 (5,233,556) -0.18% 1.79 0.69 0.49 2,861,002,666 ? $ 2,857,725,021 ' $ (3,277,645); $ -0.11%j 1.691 0.71 0.491 2,697,941,850 ' $ 2,611,034,734 $ 2,689,592,662 $ 2,688,886,776 $ 2,599,728,360 $ 2,680,314,959 $ (9,055,074) $ (11,306,374) $ (9,277,703) $ -0.43%, -0.34% -0.34%- 1.61 0.79 7 0.6 ; 1.54 0.86 0.77: 1.45 0.89 3,037,624,588 3,032,729,233 (4,895356)1 -0.16% 1.38 ......... .. 0.791 0.64 0.79 THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: Aaa/MR1 BY MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICES AAA/V1+ BY FITCH RATINGS 105 Portfolio Characteristics SECTOR Federal Agency Cash Equivalent & M M F Commercial Paper Negotiable CD's M edium Term Notes M unicipal Bonds Certificates of Deposit Local Agency Obligation Total Market Value 1,649,259,609 337,900,000 749,062,104 50,000,000 19,893,200 6,079,638 10,000,000 1,800,000 2,823,994,551 30 days or Less 30-90Days 90 Days - 1Year 1- 2 Years 2 - 3 Years Over 3 Years Total 1,257,854,263.05 393,117,505.56 237,245,758.34 682,551,533.75 24 Month Gross Yield Trends CREDIT QUALITY Federal Agency AAA A-1/ P-lorbetter N/R Total M arket Value 1,649,259,609 25, 972, 838 1,135, 962,104 12, 800, 000 2,823,994,551 • Market Data 9/30/04 8/30/04 Diff. 3 M 1.700 1.557 0.123 6 M 1.986 1.790 0.196 2 Y 2.605 2.456 0.149 5 Y 3.371 3.376 -0.001 10Y 4.119 4.176 -0.056 30 Y 4.892 4.98 -0.088 3M0 6M0 2YR 5YR 10 Y 30YR• *The Money Fund reportTM /All Tax- able Average is compiled and re- ported by iMoneyNet, Inc. (formerly IBC Financial Data, Inc.) iMoney- Net, Inc. is a leading provider of independent analyses and informa- tion to the financial services indus- try, with a particular area of focus in money market mutual funds. The All- Taxable Index tracks the yield of over 500 taxable money market funds across several categories i.e. Treasury, Government, and Prime and reports the average yield those funds on a monthly basis. For more information on the iMoneyNet, Inc. Index see www.ibcdata.com/index.html Page 2 106 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund September 30, 2004 31339X2L7 3133 4 31339XRJ5 3133X ? 3133X5PV4 3133X5HK7 31339YMA7 M�End Portfolio Holdings Report CUSIP PAR DESCRIPTION COUPON MATURITY BOOK VALUE' PRICE M. VALUE* GAIN/LOSS YLD MAT' M Dur.4 Avg Life 2 CPD - COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 7'l708EK[ *now "PF,1.7 TE 93114EK48 50,000,000 WAL MART STORES INC Al -I -/P1 9026CK61 45920DK85 50,000,000 IBM CORP Al/P1 641050‹ tar "; c :�A 1`orgo #t: it 17307JKD3 50,000,000 CITI GRP GLB MKTS Al +/P1 10.901<t: AIKOMA9101 0556C2KF9 50,000,000 BMW US CAPITAL AI/P1 tIWPITtr 000,000 KOCH IND Al AOCH GE CAPITAL Al 50000AKS6 36959HKU0 00137EKV6 50,000,000 50,000,000 AIG FUNDING INC Al /P1 89233GLJ3 50,000,000 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 750,000,000 FCDN - FARM CRED DISCOUNT NOTES 40,000,000 FFCB - FED FARM CREDIT BANK 31331TEY3 313310589 '.31 3 31331TQS3 3133<. 3128X2Z65 3133.11` 31331T3C3 31331T4F5 31331 W6 5,000,000 FED 0.01*,000 5,000,000 FED '1'5,000,000,=� '"1;004 i3,; Ait DRRRRtor.r BANK ,6 ; 10,000,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc3Mo 20,8403 MCREbrrBANK.a: . 10,000,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc !90. .<.RI�D<. 4T BANK, z..- 20,000,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK2 1/4YrNc3 lo cod'" :BANK YtN01 FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc6Mo ift4'1;6ANK2YrNc1Yr FARM CREDIT BANK2YrNc6Mo-CFFC SANKS.6YiNc e. 5,000,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 1.75Yr '6,601€ 00O 5,110,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc6Mo OA C, 5,000,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 2YrNc 10.000,000 "FE4104i { `4T'BANK2.5Y:1y'* " 5,000,000 FED FARM CREDIT BANK3YrNc6Mo 165,510,000 FHLB - FED HOME LOAN BANK HOME LOAN BANK13MoNc3Mo WOAttIBANK 1YrN, FED HOME LOAN BANK1.25YrNc3Mo ST(1E'LOAN HANK1"'( A3 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK18MoNc3Mo 44.0.. OME LOAN BANK 2°%�, ,',f' 3133X7CM4 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 1.5YrNc6Mo1 r�3 ti P2 i 6131,4Vtli3M ""LOANsAN[02: $ " '%aWi,,. 3133X5WD6 31339YFL1 3133X3ET6 3133X7XM'E 3133X3DS9 31 OM" 3133X6RS7 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK1.75YrNc6Mo tt{i00 )=ET3?i ` a 3133X3TA1 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc3Mo .1. 06 FED 140„ 3133X5J74 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc3Mo '.•x�� 000 FED:4M 3133X5ZF5 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 2YrNc1Yr1X . Emit 3133X6S49 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc3Mo1x 3133X22Y0 5,050,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc6MoStep 17,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc3Mo 1 &E 'Om BANK2.25Y, 20,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc3Mo �. ._ PEO ti0M14EL 'agf• ' ,. 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.25YrNc3Mo OU€S 000 ;1= 1k1 K. ' 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.25YrNc3Mo1 . 14,000.000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc1Mo 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK1.75YrNc6Mo 's o -id sat /,�'„.A.t itt4E LOAN BANK2"aR,,",,,•" 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc1Yr 71i LY21OM i3OAN BANK.'T:/:v w , 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 31339YR61 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3133X3C92 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 2 5YrNc6MoS 3133X8200. A4E LOAN 13ANK2.ZSY, 313 6 5.000,000 _FED HOME LOAN BANK2.25YrNc3Mo Itt HOME LOA3N*14.. 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.5YrNc3Mo 3YrNc3MoSte ... 1 OfIaQ;lFi i'}745M L4109W , .< *f3 ,�Y"6. 1.72 1.76 1.75 1.72 1.74 169 1 76 10/28/2004 1.74 1.75 0,778 --r .. . ;,,g :.:,='4sssD '>•., 49,976,111 49,976,111 '111W6.972 49,9948, 48, 667 ? ,9 10/29/2004 49,922,222 1112? 1*Miri ,10t3Ut 1.76 11/18/2004 49,872889 749,062,104 1.58 1.76 1 90 39,508,333 10/4/2004 101St 10/8/2004 '#0/8/2R€t4 10/13/2004 49,948,667 *1614/2004. Yomm. 10/15/2004 49,958,681 99.92 49,958,681 ...01 .• ',.,.. 4?" . .. �:.. .. ;=;.n�a• �Y 10/26/2004 24,966,167 99.86 24,966,167 WiftWral 99.86 r*1. 49,926,667 99 85 49,926,667 16: . 'M O, '. ' 99.84 49,922,222 9975 49,872,889 749,062,104 99.95 49,976,111 y. ,. 49,976,111 V2005ey y ' ., & ad04 08:7.2. 7/8/2005 10,000,000 9947 9,946,875 (53,125) ;7120/2005 ^: " ss.47" 44601::AT? :.a00) 9/22/2005 9,999,400 99 44 9,943,750 (55,650) ;4119/2005 0/24/2005 9,508,333 2.00 _:.. 1/23/2006 2.00 3/29/2006 2.60 5/19/2006 3.(1� 3.20 2.60 3.02 11/21/2006 8/9/2006 Wes'' 9/7/2006 3/1/2005 6/30/2005 NOV 2005•' 1.70 9/16/2005 2.58 12/9/2005 1/19/2006 2.16 1/27/2006 2.00 2/13/2006 21171200fi ;1/ 2.26 2/17/2006 2/22/2i?66.�. 2.35 2/27/2006 2.00 4/13/2006 ? ia 4/24/2008° 2.15 4/26/2006 5/19/2006 5/25/2006 6/12/2006 6/30/2006 6/30/2006 7/14/2006 7/28/2006 2 38 7/28/2006 7/28/2006 7/28/2006 20.000,000 93.84 2" . ~ xu- g` 99 47 19,893,750 966 5,000,000 99 31 4,965,625 (106,250) 44..:i irP (34,375) 2. 0.08 1.76 0.13 0.13 1.72 0.05 1.29 0 21 98,81 5,000,000 99.09 4,954,650 45,350 2.00 ..365 -Va ..: Wvt66` (7,813) 2.60 5,000,000 6.600;0()(1 5,110,000 5,00(10 a�1i 4,996,700 99.84 4,992,188 00.28 5,124,372 '9914. e.>..r 99.53 „ 98M 5,000,000 100.09 165,506,100 1fl13Qp.0 ;;` 5,000,000 99.81 111;000;4t)t 9.84. 4,998,438 99.34 9929 5,000,000 99.34 9953 100.03 5,000,000 5,000,000 99.03 5,000,000 99.50 4,990,550 99 25 5,000,000 99 59 'UMW 99.69' 5,000,000 99.66 4,982,813 (17,188) •w 0969" .;3�,, ;i,???; M i: 5,004,688 164,696,109 4,990,625 4,967,188 .,rte,'",.' 4,967,188 5,001,563 4,951,563 4,975,000 4,962,500 4,979,688 14,372 3.20 (3,126}) ai3-' (20,138 2.63 t1c ' : •:147 3.02 4,688 (809,991) 2.12 1.29 0.36 1 90 OtZr TRW 0.77 0.98 1.06 1.31 A6 1.86 (9,375) 1.47 0 42 0.42 (31,250) 1.37 (32,813) 1.70 (*RUT12 1,563 2.58 0.19 ,(BZ (48,438) (s (25,000 (28,050 20,313 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,046,844 17,000,000 20,000,000 4,991,406 5,000,000 99.06 4,953,125 (46,875) . 9910 ` ,.r`'',,„ „ ' /: Je*W" 99.22 4,960,938 (39,063) :'98.66 ..:' M ' ua:. (.34.1 99.72 4,985,938 (14,063) 2.50 1.60 D9' ,:�':- , rr� .... W."s .� 6 �°88, . .. `" .-':''8,194: . .3.05:,1::,ga"3d-," : .x00 99.97 5,048,422 1,578 2.81 0.15 104,(?( ,. ,'M`L999.950; a 3.00'(`" } 5' 0.96 0.96 1.19 1.75 1.28 1.30 691: 13:906V1~.41 2.16 1.31 1.32 2 09 1.36 2.26 1.36 99.44 16,904,375 :<6,431,400 '- 98.91 19,781,250 (218,750) 75 `-= :r: 8B,r, .. . (312 98.78 4,939,063 (52,344) Mac : 15 98.69 4,934,375 (65,625) 14,000,000 99.16 10,000,000 99.59 "10 r :`,,"", .6v9.. 2.35 rt713' ' 2.00 (95,625) 2,38 1.67 2.11 1.72 1.75 2.11 1.72 1.75 1.63 1.37 1.38 1.41 1.53 1.57 1.65 1.70 2.01 1.76 1.79 13,881,875 (118,125) 2.30 1.79 1.82 (Wait, AMU 9,959,375 (40,625) 2.37 1.79 1.82 ��10,�0„„0y0�,0.0y0.".1.9,2k 100.06 10,006,250 6,250 2.76 0.08 1.82 :/7„1 08580 .99 y} ; ,063; ,.,. x.a ::� ' . :! \�. .° 9: ; 4.976,563 (23438) 2.51 1.78 182 .9;##46.070. = ostwool ,,_ ,.,. / r . 9 943 750 51 563 2.52 1.83 1.86 5,000,000 99.53 9.996,07,x' ;::'$06. 8/11/2006 9,995,313 99.44 (51,563) 8/'(4/2006: 128 06 .°,9§ 4d _)(1932.. , Page 11167 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund September 30, 2004 Month End Portfolio Holdings Report CUSIP PAR DESCRIPTION COUPON MATURITY BOOK VALUE' PRICE M. VALUE* GAIN/LOSS YLD MAT M Dur.4 Avg. Life 3133X88N1 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 2YrNc3Mo 3.01 033 VANCISIM400464.01100_,WWIESPIEltatWO. 3133X8L75 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2YrNc1Mo 3.00 3133X5MA3 10 000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.5YrNc6Mo1X 2.11 3133X5SM1 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.5YrNc9Mo 2 15 , it M A it40 k3 r �_� 4x00 3133X5WCB 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2 5YrNc3Mo '4(3„UPPA3 ti ON :BI1NivtetfiWALAM 3133X1 U70 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc3MoStep 3133X7ZK3 5,450,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.25YrNc3Mo ,SMOOMMI, ,'„0,041016 3133X6VM5 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2 1010.01"": AritatiVW7 VW_ 3133X5CQ9 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK2.75YrNc6Mo 2.42 2.25 3.40 5YrNc6Mo1x 3.00 3133X4CS8 5,805,000 FED HOME LOAN E3 3133X4HY0 8,215,000 BANK3YrNc6MoStep FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc3MoStep 1( }VYNc3M0 p`°;"°,> ' 2.42 9/7/2006 5,000,000 9/28/2006 5,000,000 9/29/2006 10,000,000 WV 10/20/2006 5,000,000 10/27/2006 11/13/2006 11/17/2006 11/22/2006 1/5/2007 100.09 100.06 5,004,688 5,003,125 98 53 9,853,125 98.47 98 53 4,926,563 100-00' `;..;'' ,yte ."`'€�s"' 5,000,000 99.07 4,953,375 9,995,313 5,000,000 98.84 100 00 10,000,000 5,450,000 100.16 5,458,516 100 09 5,004,688 9,884,375 10,000,000 2.25 3/9/2007 5,804,093 9963 5,783,231 2..50 ;' 0)W';`1' 4 , , A00 " 100.03 ... 4 2 00 3/16/2007 8,215,000 99 75 8,194,463 2,00 : , , 3130J f f ` XYJ 93•94 3133X5TLZ 5,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc3Step 2.00 4/27/2007 5,000,000 99.53 4,976,563 (23,438) � .t `:' �'Tr � , 414134$1-001" "• ¢A Caa : . 3133X62Z8 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK 3YrNc3MoSt 4,688 3.01 0. 9 3,125 3.00 0.08 146875) 2.11_._ 1.97 1.94 1.99 200 (73,438 2 15 2.01 2 05 (46,625) 2.42 2.02 2 07 4,688 3.08 0.12 2.12 8,516 3.39 0.13 2.13 144. 4,688 3.00 0.14 2.14 3133X6H25 10,000,000 FED HOME LOAN BANK3YrNc1Mo (115,625) 2.42 2.19 226 (20,862) 2 26 1 42 2 44 i"A�/'pCAVOC. ';3;38 - O.A4'...'`'�,'T• (20,538) 2.98 046 2.46 q :08 1.48: 23 438 2.82 0 57 2.57 - a•�tj .9 '�'t;% .<,< �5 i� ':1� ;,wT;:;..� �5:01.'Or(i''%5%f-„' 2.25 r, 4/30/2007 9,998,438 9978 9,978,125 (20,313 3.07 0.58 2.58 i1 fir;Nfintor ,i.,,--.1.1;',','40,0401111111160k0. 10009375 3.21 5/11/2007 10,000,000 100.03 10,003,125 3,125 3.21 003 261 x',ry1+'�,rC�',�ot r3.a1T'r.: "5/140.0''W : 'Y ''140, •� 9:804.26k01221iMIGESEVI.l+w" ;. ... (1.05` ' "216,-V 585,650,000 585,597,037 582,534,841 (3,062,196) 2.43 1.79 FHLC - FHLB - MORTG. CERT. 41111011#4;7 1 AUfTG,"C.ERT:2i( �' 'M '� : Y1 OE}$ 3128X28W4 5,000,000 FHLB - MORTG CERT 2YrNc6Mo1X 11/28/2005 "+ a REV RTG-CERi.0.1, 3133X5ZA9 5,000,000 FHLB - MORTG CERT 1 75YrNc9M1 3128X2ZV0 6,275,000 FHLB - MORTG CERT.2YrNc3Mo 3128X3AX1 3128X3GT4 3128X3WJ8 3128X2264 1I : 400,004 FH473,» : 10,�0.0e.x0�,000 FHLB - MORTG CERT.2YrNc6Mo 5,000,000 FHLB - 2.25 2.02 1/27/2006 2 2.11 3/15/2006 2.22 4/27/2006 MORTG CERT.2YrNc3Mo 3.00 5,000,000 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.2YrNc6Mo-CFFC 10,000,000 FHLB - MORTG. CERT3YrNc1Yr1xSt 11§A00 30„FHL134 C..,,.. .. 3128X22F1 10,000,000 FHLB - MORTG. CERT.3YrNc1Yr IIIMONIANS ISOMCAMMIMM 3128X3AY9 5.000,000 FHLB - MORTG. CERT. 3YrNc3Mo 111,275,000 FHLD - FED HOME LOAN DISCOUNT 35,000,000 FNMA - FED NAT MORTG ASSOC. '31136F5Via''' •i t +'./4. 41 '- ..,, 3136E3748 20,000,610 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC2 YrNc3MoSt 2 13 4133X2$93 ' 10,00x;00 ? (0•AMTaki Pt8t f , , 7 7 QIY61, 3136F4MG6 10,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2.25YrNc1Y 2.00 1/27/2006 7,066000 " ,A. , TMOY) ''"71 4,1150; 4:s; : 6/2/2006 9/29/2006 ��507 2.00 3/2/2007 ArAIIIMISINDO, 7 2.49 4/5/2007 issamai 3.00 4/30/2007 3136F45N0 3136F5HR5 31'.34` -$.15 3136F5HQ7 313636E:S4 3136F5PX1 31W4(N2 3136F5E09 3136'3U53 3136E3789 0136F6k10,„ 3136F5JT9 '3136F000;-. 10,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC. 2.5YrNc 2.02 2/6/2006 FEO 1,,AT O0 0 ' ")�... °.'1a'• m '.- 4,775 000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2YrNc6Mo 2.17 2/17/2006 FEO.NAT .4.. ` , ' 040 ' 2,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC 2YrNc3Mo-RCTC 2 05 3/29/2006 -0i .41�,.'+2'(`SNC3DAC1 ASIONELVI05 5,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2YrNc1YrSt 1 40 3/29/2006 )i •%1,-O 0.•=-41Yf8M03�,j••,�'.AIMMIN.. r " 2fio 3/3012000,1 5,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2YrNc1X 4,55,(3, t-visoata�„"I t t: „: .48 . 4/21)301 10,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2.25YrNc1Y 10,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC. 3YrNc6Mo 5,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2.5YrNc1Yr 5,4000438 Nh a�YY <et 91 9120710. '' s- z „12.730 3,0A. 0.50 3136F5LV1 5,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2.5YrNc6Mo 31391 . ':0 ;;- 5,0000a- faiNATIOMMOSINfitirOis 3136F5D57 5,000,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.2.5YrNc1Yr t8,,, T 0PNAT" 3136F5VY4 6,500,000 FED NAT MORTG ASSOC.3YrNc3MoSt 189,125,000 FNMD - FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 313306,753 dning7S, T t tOT% 313588263 313580M36 313396M8 3135881992 ; I + i'3T NME33 313588073 40,000,000 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 313588R50 ., ' raf45, ' " 313396R62 15,000,000 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 2.10 4/19/2006 213 6/15/2006 "`U%%' 2 Iii rav, : TC2412009`;' 2.25 7/28/2006 984 99.79 5,000,000 5,000,000 99.31 6,273,118 99.30 10,000,000 99.36 5,000,000 100.01 5,000,000 100.17 10,000,000 99.83 10,000 000 98 98 5,000,000 ✓ 99.85 111,273,118 34,963,211 4,989,300 10,700 4,965,625 (34,375) -04,$63)' 6,231,012 (42,105) s9 ,3, Th71 (21,700) 9,936,200 (63,800) %:•.;z kiicQ,.',_ 5,000,450 450 3.00 0.01 5,008,450 8,450 3.00 0 50 9,983,100 (16,900) 2.88 0.42 242 9,898,300. (101,700)_... 2.49 2.43 2.51 4,992,250 110,824,918 34,963,211 (7,750) IN 2.48 2.58 (448,200) ' 9,974;875 " (23f25j'M" 99.84 19,968,750 (31,250) 1 71 0.83 0.83 9,906,250 99.34 9,934,375 28,125 2 43 1.30 1.32 2.55 1.72 1.86 0.03 9,995,313 99.34 9,934,375 (60,938) 204 1.34 1.35 ' 5,000,000 .: 1,1 KO. ' 1s /.. 4,773,508 99.50 4,751,125 22,383) 2 19 1.36 1 38 VI 3fl .. ..,, : 1:41,;. 99.19 1,983,750 (16,250) 205 1.48 1.49 �... ... 2,9756725, (24;375) 2.0 , 4,978,125 (21,875) 219 5 7100,503. - 2;21)`'; 4,987,500 (12,500) 9,890,625:' .:.(109,375) 9,906,250 (92,188) 9.9§A50:, (37,540) 9,959,375 (40,625) § iii 0(14729100 6:2 3.00 0.21 9/29/2006 5,000,000 98.56 4,928,125 (71,875) 2 07 1 97 2 25 2.30 2 02 1.13 1 14 1 26 1 31 1:161 1 16 1: 1 32 2.15 1.37 213 144 145 2.;�r.:;;;1% 1.54 .. •. v��'���;'��r 2.22 154 157 40,000,000 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 0 NSO1 Vt711NTAOTE .. 10,000,000 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 2.13 10/5/2006 5,000,000 98.69 4,934,375 (65,625) 2.13 196 - . ,, .... qa ;.;1 a :"A'A.:.,. • ,_..ash 2.25 12/15/2006 4,998,438 100 03 5,001,563 3,125 3.88 ;`, VMZ ,' I9 t •- - 99:00 2.38 5/10/2007 6,498.984 100 00 189,016,833 6.500.000 188,228,406 4 45,881,95$ 1.72 10/6/2004 39,973,244 99.93 39,973,244 '4 ( ('aZIM.. '72 1UT2f. ;-; 2rx •w...c 39,935.022 99.36 9,936,100 1.07 11/1/2004 !AINIKEWINIMIKZ7- tit 1.76 11/24/2004 39,876,800 99.69 1„Allnefvr,S'1i7 :79 . 11/3012004'°''t f 1.07 12/1/2004 14,882,300 99.22 39,876,800 14,882,300 1,016 (788,427) 3 45 2.30 1,52 1 72 1.72 1 10 1.82 1.79 1.07 0.70 0 11 2 10 2.45 2.13 1 69 1.71 2.35 0:31' - ;t V 2 33 0 82 1 82 2 00 2.00 201 2-11 2.21 H 261 1.56 0 02 0 02 0:07 stt) 009 009 0.11 0 15 0 17 'W17 Page 2;168 Treasurers Pooled lnvestment Fund September 30, 2004 M�End Portfolio Holdings Report CUSIP PAR DESCRIPTION COUPON MATURITY BOOK VALUE' PRICE M. VALUE* GAIN/LOSS YLD MAT' M Dur.4 0.15 313589AU7 40,000,000 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 386,000,000 HOME LOAN MORG CORP DI ,34,Wittg CO 35,000 000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORG CORP DI .) ORGCORk 313397AE1 25.000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORG CORP DI 145,000,000 LAO - LOCAL AGENCY OBLIGATIONS 865,000 US DISTRICT COURT RIVCO CTFS 1,800,000 MMF- MONEY MARKET FUND 1,000,000 MTNO - MED TERM NOTES GMT- 36962GF82 10,000,000 GE CAPITAL GROUP 20,000,000 MUNI - MUNICIPAL BONDS 2.00 1/30/2006 10.000.000 99.15 20,000,000 76886PAV5 1,545.000 RCC GO BONDS 20048 AA-/Aa3 6,045,000 NCD - NEGOTIABLE CD 50,000,000 REPO- REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 136,900,000 MERRILL LYNCH 336,900,000 TCD - TIME DEPOSITS TOTAL 'Th and yield of shun -ten, money marker securniea are based on purchased price 'Avers is the number of years until principal is remrrcd al maturity, weighted by market value. 'host Agency Obligations have variable rata coupons, spread to the Pool 'Modified Duration. The percentage price change of security fora given change in yield. The higher the modified duration of a security. the higher its risk. 10,000,000 2,833,305,000 511111M, • 2.23 3.63 6/15/2020 8/1/2007 384,171,316 34,749,517 99.28 24,763,292 99.05 144,332,475 865 000 100.00 1,800,000 1,000,000 1.550,871 100.57 6,097,581 50,000,000 get 1.85 -� 10/1/2004 136,900,000 100.00 336,900,000 10,000,000 2,829,228,108 39,615,000 "d4; 7 $7q• 384,171,316 34 749,517 24,763,292 144,332,475 865.000 1,800,000 1,000,000 9 914 800 19,893,200 1,553,853 6,079,638 50,000,000 136,900.000 336,900,000 10,000,000 1.55 (85.200) (106,800) 2.23 2.23 1.46 2.00 1.32 2.12 2,982 3.49 2.71 2,823,994,551 (17,943) 3.10 1.77 1.85 0.00 1.85 1.6 0.15 15.72 11.60 0.08 1.33 2.83 2.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 (5,233,556) 1.95 0.49 0.69 Page 3;1(69 Summary of Authorized Investments • The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in FULL COMPLIANCE with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy. The County's Investment Policy is more restrictive than the California Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. California Government Code LOCAL AGENCY BONDS CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY DEBT BILLS OF EXCHANGE CERTIFICATE & TIME DEPOSITS REVERSE REPOS 0 TES CaITRUST SHORT TERM FUND Maximum Maturity 5 YEARS 5 YEARS SECURED BANK DEPOSITS LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS Count Investment Polic Authorized % Limit I Quality S&P/ Maximum Matur- I Authorized % Quality S&P/ Moody's I ity Limit Moody's NO LIMIT NO LIMIT YEARS' NO WIT 270 DAYS 40% 11 AYS 40% 5 YEARS 92 DAYS 5 YEARS N/A 5 YEARS N/A 30% 20% N/A NO LIMIT NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 3 YEARS 15%/ $15OMM 180 DAYS 30% A1/P1 270 D�% :. 40% N/A 1 YEAR 60 DAYS 'YEA1 25% MAX A/A2/A 2.5% INVESTMENT GRADE 0.06% Al/P1/F1 A3fP1/F1 Al/P1/F1 10% MAX N/A • 20°% MAX AA/ 1% DAILY LIQUIDITY 1 YEAR 3 YEARS 2% 0% MAX Board Approved 0.00% Actual Rixeiside Pcitfelio'S 0.22% 0.00% 2.12% 0.00% 0.00% 1 No more than 30% of this category may be invested with any one commercial bank 2 Mutual Funds maturity may be interpreted as weighted average maturity not exceeding 90 days 3 Or must have an investment advisor with not less than 5 years experience and with assets under management of $500,000,000. Projected Cash Flow The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. Based upon projected cash receipts and matu- rating investments, there are sufficient Funds to meet future cash flow disbursements over the next 12 months. Monthly Month Receipts Monthly Disbmts Difference Required Mat. Invest Balance Actual Inv. Maturities Avail. To Invest> 1Yr. 10/2004 66.3 11/2004 'PR6 667.3 (78.7) 78.6 0 305.0 01/2005 524.1 938.1 (414.0) 29.0 0 75.0 03/ 5 7713 699.1 72.2 73 5.0 05/2005 520.4 699.9 (179.5) 22 10.0 07/2005 626.6 625.2 14 2 58.8 7.4 09/2005 3810 487.9 (106.9) 102.0 0 15.0 Totals 7,595.1 8,449.9 (854.8) 788.6 12 3% 1,892.7 2,034.4 67.05% 72.07% THIS COMPLEtE.S THE REPORT REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOV T CODE 53646 Page 3 AGENDA ITEM 6F • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Accounting Manager Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Interfund Loan Activity Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Interfund Loan Activity Report for the month ended October 31, 2004. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 14, 2004, the Commission approved the Interfund Loan Policy and adopted Resolution No. 04-009 "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Authorize Interfund Loans". The Commission requested that interfund loan activity be reported on a monthly basis. The attached report details all interfund loan activity through October 31, 2004. The total outstanding interfund loan amounts as of October 31, 2004 are $575,000. Attachment: Interfund Loan Activity Report Agenda Item 6F 111 • Ri verside County Loan Activitio mmission • Intertund Loan Activit� For period ended Octob er 31, 2004 Amount Maturity Date of Loan of Loan Date Lending Fund April 2, 2003 $ 300,000 July 1, 2006 Measure A - WC Highway (222) Measure A - WC LSR (227) Date Commissioned Borrowing Fund Purpose of Loan Approv ed Advance to make repairs and improvements to Railroad Canyon Road March 12, 2003 M arch 4, 2004 275,000 July 1, 2009 Measure A - WC Commuter Measure A - WC Highway (222) Additional local match for the SR71 December 10, 2003 Assistance (226) Widening/Animal Crossing Project Total $ 575,000 112 V,\USERS\AGENDA\2004\12 December\Cisneros- Interfund Loan Activity Rpt .xls AGENDA ITEM 6G • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Follow-up on STIP/STPL Fund Trade for State Route 79 Widening Project from Hunter Road to Domenigoni Parkway STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve trading $3.55 million of delayed State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds with federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds for the SR 79 widening project as a follow-up to the January 2004 Commission action. • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • In January 2004, the Commission approved trading delayed State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding with federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. The projects targeted for the trade were projects programmed in the STIP in fiscal years 2002-03 through 2004-05. These projects were then deleted from the STIP and reprogrammed with STP funds. This action allowed these projects, including the SR 79 widening project from Hunter Road to Domenigoni Parkway, to move forward rather than continue being delayed in the STIP. Prior to trading funds on the SR 79 project, Caltrans was the lead agency and had begun working on project development activities (environmental and preliminary engineering). At the January 2004 Commission meeting, it was unknown how much Caltrans had expended on project development work, and therefore, only the unallocated construction phase received approval for the trade of STP funds. At last month's California Transportation Commission (CTC) meeting, a technical adjustment was made to the STIP to credit our county share with the unexpended amount for project development work on SR 79. The unexpended amount was $3.55 million. Therefore, staff requests that the Commission approve $3.55 million of additional STP funds for the SR 79 project. The $3.55 million credit to our STIP county share will be available for programming in the 2006 STIP at the discretion of the Commission. Agenda Item 6G 113 AGENDA ITEM 6H • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Approve Agreement No. 05-31-527, Amendment No. 1 to the State Route 91 Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1152, Between Caltrans and the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Prepare Project Approval and Environmental Documents for the State Route 91 HOV Lane Project from Adams Street to 60/91/215 Interchange STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-31-527, Amendment No. 1 to the SR 91 Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1 152, to increase the Caltrans oversight costs by $234,000, which will be funded from the current Traffic Congestion Relief allocation; and, 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The SR 91 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane project from Mary Street to the 60/91/215 Interchange was allocated $3.7 million of Traffic Congestion Relief (TCR) funds. The SR 91 Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1152 between Caltrans and the Commission allows Caltrans to charge up to $370,000 (or 10 percent of the project allocation) for project oversight responsibilities. The 10 percent is an arbitrary estimate that was established by legislation; however, project oversight activities can be as low as 5 percent and up to 35 percent or higher depending on the scope and requirements of each project. In addition to the oversight responsibilities for the SR 91 HOV project, Caltrans incurred expenses preparing a Value Analysis (VA) and Right -of -Way (R/W) Data Sheet in the amount of $87,000 and $32,000 respectively. These activities totaling $119,000 are beyond the typical oversight services. Agenda Item 6H 114 Caltrans expenditures to date for the 91 HOV project total $454,000. It is estimated that oversight activities over the next five months will be $150,000 bringing the total cost to $604,000. A summary of the oversight expenditures is as follows: Oversight Expenditures to date $454,000 Projected Expenditures (next 5 months) $150,000 Total Oversight, VA and R/W $604,000 Less 10% Approved Oversight ($370,000) Additional Funds Needed $234,000 Staff recommends Agreement No. 05-31-527 to increase the oversight expenditures by $234,000 to: 1) cover the additional funds needed for the Value Analysis and Right -of -Way data sheet preparation; and 2) increase the 10 percent ceiling for oversight services. Given that the environmental document for the SR 91 HOV project is expected to be cleared by Spring 2005, sufficient funds are available from the TCR allocation to cover the $234,000 increase. Throughout the duration of the environmental phase, staff will be working closely with Caltrans on monitoring the oversight expenditures. • • Agenda Item 6H 115 AGENDA ITEM 61 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Technical Advisory Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: City of Riverside Request to Reprogram Regional Improvement Program Funds TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item if for the Commission to approve the City of Riverside's request to reprogram State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds from the Van Buren widening project (Jackson Street to the Santa Ana River) to the State Route 91 Van Buren Interchange. III BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • At its November 14, 2001 meeting, the Commission approved $3.465 million of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds for the Van Buren Boulevard widening project from Jackson Street to the Santa Ana River. These funds are currently programmed in the 2004 STIP in FY 2006-07. The City of Riverside is accelerating the project with 100% local funds. Therefore, the city is requesting to reprogram the RIP funds to another high priority project, the SR 91 and Van Buren Interchange improvement project, in the same fiscal year (FY 2006-07). RCTC staff supports the city's request based on the following: 1) There is no capacity in the STIP to request an advance allocation; 2) The city has committed to advance the Van Buren widening project with local funds; and 3) the SR 91 Van Buren Interchange project is regionally significant and is identified in the Measure "A" Strategic Plan. This item was presented to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) on November 15, 2004. The TAC unanimously supported the City of Riverside's request. Upon approval of this item, staff will proceed with an amendment to the STIP and Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG) Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). Agenda Item 61 116 AGENDA ITEM 6J • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Technical Advisory Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: City of Riverside Request to Reprogram Transportation Enhancement Activities Funds TECH/CAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the reprogramming of $277,000 of Transportation Enhancement Activities funds from the University Streetscape project to the Victoria Restoration project; 2) Deprogram the remaining $225,000 of TEA funds from the University Streetscape project to allow the city to move forward with the project using local funds; and, 3) Allow the City of Riverside to trade the remaining $225,000 with another Commission approved federal project by January 30, 2005. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Riverside is requesting the reprogramming of $277,000 Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) funds from the University Streetscape project to the Victoria Restoration project. These two projects were approved by the Commission in 1999. The Victoria Restoration project was allocated $511,571 and is ready to be obligated. The University Streetscape project was allocated $501,571 and is scheduled for obligation in November 2005. After reviewing the University Streetscape project with Caltrans, it was determined that the project would face many obstacles (e.g. historical and right-of-way issues) resulting in a significant delay to the current schedule and cost increase. Therefore, the city decided to commit local funding on the University Streetscape project, which will allow the city to implement the project in a much timelier and cost efficient manner. Agenda Item 6J 117 The city is requesting that $277,000 of the $501,571 approved for the University Streetscape project be reprogrammed to the Victoria Restoration project. The city has also requested that they be provided the opportunity to trade the remaining $225,000 from the University Streetscape to another Commission approved federal project. Staff is supportive of giving the city until January 30, 2005 to identify a project trade. If the city cannot identify a project trade, then RCTC staff will reprogram the funds to other eligible active projects so that funds are obligated in a timely fashion. RCTC staff supports the City of Riverside's request, especially because of the urgent need to obligate $1 .5 million of 3 year -old TEA funds in the next six months or risk losing funds under AB 1012. In addition, TEA projects that are not obligated by June 2005 will be required to be amended into the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The STIP would impose additional time restrictions that currently do not exist, which will heighten the risk of losing funds when timelines are not met. Lastly, the City of Riverside's commitment to funding the University Streetscape project with local funds will provide a quicker delivery of this enhancement project. This item was presented to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) on November 15, 2004. The TAC unanimously supported the City of Riverside's request. • Agenda Item 6J 118 AGENDA ITEM 6K • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Eric Haley, Executive Director THROUGH: Western County Members of the Technical Advisory Committee Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Marilyn Williams, Director of Regional Programs and Public Affairs SUBJECT: TUMF Regional Arterial Priority Project Recommendation for City of Moreno Valley WESTERN COUNTY MEMBERS OF THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Reche Vista/Reche Canyon realignment and widening project submitted by the City of Moreno Valley as eligible for TUMF Regional funding pursuant to the Commission's call for projects; and, 2) Program $409,000 in TUMF Regional funds for Project Development (PA&ED) work and incorporate the project into the five-year TUMF Regional Arterial Program for the period FY 2005 to FY 2009. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission took action at its September 8, 2004 meeting to establish a five-year Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial Program for the period FY 2005 to FY 2009. The action approved a total of 23 projects as eligible to receive funding under the Program and allocated $71 .3 million in TUMF Regional funds as follows: a) b) c) d) e) $08.7 M - Project Development (PA&ED) $09.5 M - Design (PS&E) $19.0 M - Right of Way $09.1 M - Construction FY '05 thru 09 FY '05 thru 09 FY '05 thru 06 FY '05 thru 06 $25.0 M - Mid County Parkway & SR 79 Realignment Projects The 23 funded projects were submitted pursuant to a Call for Projects issued in June by the Commission as the first step in creating a five-year TUMF Regional Arterial Program for Western Riverside County. A total of 29 projects from 12 agencies were original received in response to the Call for Projects. As noted in the Agenda Item 6K 119 September agenda item three projects were deemed ineligible for funding as they were not on the list of High Priority Regional Arterials approved by the Commission and one project was withdrawn. In addition, staff indicated that two projects would be brought back to the Commission for funding consideration in the future. This agenda item seeks approval of funding for one of those two projects in the amount of $409,000 for Moreno Valley's Reche Vista/Reche Canyon realignment and widening project (Tracking #27). While the city's project is eligible to receive a maximum total TUMF amount of $13.68 million through construction of the project, only funding for Phase I - Project Approvals and Environmental Document (PA&ED) work is being recommended at this time. The recommendation is consistent with the city's proposed project schedule and funding request. Approval of the city's project will allow Commission staff to proceed with programming the project in SCAG's Regional Transportation Improvement Program. • Agenda Item 6K 120 AGENDA ITEM 6L • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement No. 05-31-524, with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) Services During Construction of the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes on State Route 60 in Moreno Valley STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-31-524 with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) services during construction of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on State Route 60 in Moreno Valley, for a not to exceed contract amount of $100,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV median widening project extends from the East Junction of the SR 60 with Interstate 215 (1-215) to Redlands Boulevard in Moreno Valley. The project includes the construction of one (1) HOV lane, in each direction, in the median of SR 60, between Pigeon Pass Road and Redlands Boulevard. This median widening requires the construction of a median bridge at Pigeon Pass Road and Heacock Street and the reconstruction of the Perris Boulevard Undercrossing. Additionally, noise barriers will be constructed at various locations along the right-of-way. To assist in construction safety for the project, the Commission approved Agreement Nos. 03-31-039 for $50,000 and 04-31-056 for $150,000, in January 2003 and May 2004, respectively, with the CHP for COZEEP services, for a total of $200,000. Under these agreements, the CHP has been providing traffic enforcement services during construction. These services include, but are not Agenda Item 6L 121 limited to: providing traffic breaks; providing traffic control services for lane and/or highway closures; providing stationary traffic enforcement patrols upstream of the work area; and providing circulating traffic enforcement patrols. In June 2003, the Commission approved Agreement No. 03-31-052 with SEMA Construction for the construction of the SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV project. The Commission also approved a contingency of $2,380,951 for the project, of which approximately $250,000 was estimated for the CHP to provide COZEEP services. The first day of construction of the SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV project was August 25, 2003. The project is currently scheduled to be complete and open to traffic in early January 2005. Because the CHP limits the monetary amount, $50,000 maximum, and duration, one (1) year maximum, of their standard COZEEP contracts, staff was required to submit multiple SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV project COZEEP contracts to the Commission for its approval. Staff has been tracking the COZEEP use throughout the construction of this project and has noticed that the use of the CHP provided COZEEP services has been greater than that estimated at the beginning of the project. The major reasons for this increased use of COZEEP services are due to the minimal number of existing traffic lanes on SR 60, two (2) in each direction, and the resulting traffic congestion that continues throughout the day and into the evening. Because of these factors, any construction activities that require the closure of a lane must be done at night and requires the use of the COZEEP services. Therefore, the amount of night construction work and use of COZEEP services has exceeded that estimate. At this time, staff has estimated that an additional $100,000 in COZEEP services will be required to complete the project. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2004-05 Amount: $100,000 Source of Funds: Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) and Measure ' A Budget Ad ustment: N GLA No.: 222-31-81301 P 3000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \)//fe,vei:dvi tau Date: 12/8/2004 • • • Agenda Item 6L 122 • AGENDA ITEM 6M • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement No. 05-31-525, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 02-31-042, with Berg & Associates, Inc. to provide additional Construction Management/Inspection Services for the State Route 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Median Widening Project in Moreno Valley STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-31-525, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 02-31-042, with Berg & Associates, Inc. to provide additional Construction Management/Inspection Services for the construction of the State Route 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) median widening project in Moreno Valley, for a not to exceed contract amount of $500,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV median widening project extends from the East Junction of the SR 60/Interstate 215 (1-215) Interchange to SR 60 and Redlands Boulevard in Moreno Valley. The project includes the construction of one (1) HOV lane, in each direction, in the median of SR 60, between Pigeon Pass Road and Redlands Boulevard. This median widening requires the construction of two new median bridges at Pigeon Pass Road and Heacock Street and the reconstruction of the Perris Boulevard Undercrossing. Additionally, noise barriers and landscaping will be constructed at various locations along the right of way. In February 2002, the Commission awarded Agreement No. 02-31-042 to Berg & Associates, Inc. to provide Construction Management/Inspection Services for the construction of the SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV median widening project, for a base Agenda Item 6M 123 work amount of $3,01 1,440 and a contingency amount of $300,000, for a total • contract not to exceed amount of $3,31 1,440. In June 2003, the Commission awarded Agreement No. 03-31-052 to SEMA Construction, Inc. for construction of the SR 60 Moreno Valley HOV median widening project, for the low bid amount of $23,919,049. SEMA was given a Notice to Proceed on August 18, 2003 with the first day of construction starting on August 25, 2003. The Agreement required that SEMA complete construction, excluding plant establishment, within one (1) year after start of construction. This accelerated schedule was to minimize the amount of time and inconvenience to motorists dealing with the concurrent construction activities associated with the construction of this project and the SR 60/SR 91/1-215 Interchange project. To meet the contract schedule requirements, SEMA has consistently worked overtime, multiple shifts, and some Saturdays and Sundays. To support the construction effort, the Berg & Associates Construction Management and Inspection Team has also had to work overtime, multiple shifts, and some Saturdays and Sundays. This additional shift work was not included in Berg & Associates original contract scope of work and respective cost estimate in the subject contract. For the past year, staff has been tracking the progress of construction and also tracking the costs associated with the Berg & Associates/RCTC Construction Management/Inspection Services Contract. In September 2004, the Commission awarded Agreement No. 05-31-511, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 02-31-042, to Berg & Associates, Inc. to provide the additional Construction Management/Inspection Services, outlined above, for the construction of the SR 60 HOV median widening project in Moreno Valley, for a not to exceed contract amount of $510,000. This brought the combined contact value to $3,521,440 ($3,011,440 + $510,000) with $200,000 remaining in contingency. At the time that staff estimated the costs associated with Amendment No. 1, the construction schedule indicated that major construction activities would be complete by the end of October 2004, and that all construction activities would be complete by the end of November 2004, excluding the one (1) year plant establishment period. But, because of several unforeseen issues, including weather and material delays, the major construction activities will not be completed until the end of December 2004, allowing the HOV lanes to be opened to the public by early January 2005. Staff has estimated that the two (2) additional months of Construction Management Services plus the one (1) year of Plant Establishment Monitoring Services will cost approximately $500,000. • • Agenda Item 6M 124 • • With this agenda item, staff is recommending that the Commission approve Agreement No. 05-31-525, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 02-31-042, to Berg & Associates, Inc., to provide additional Construction Management/Inspection Services for the Construction of the SR 60 HOV Median Widening Project in Moreno Valley, for a not to exceed contract amount of $500,000. This will bring the combined contact value to $4,021,440 ($3,011,440 + $510,000 + $500,000) with $200,000 remaining in contingency. Staff recommends that the Chairman be authorized, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement and approve the expenditure of the remaining contingency funds. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 2004-05 Amount: $500,000 Source of Funds: Congestion (CMAQ) Mitigation and Air Quality Measure "A" Budget Adjustment: Y GLA No.: 222-31-81302 P 3000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14 Date: 12/8/2004 Agenda Item 6M 125 AGENDA ITEM 6N • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Progress Report for the Triennial Performance Audits: 2000-2001 through 2002-2003 Fiscal Years STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the progress report on implementing recommendations from RCTC's Triennial Performance Audit conducted for FYs 2000-2001 through 2002-2003. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In accordance with Public Utilities Code 99246, the Commission is required to designate an entity other than itself to conduct a performance audit of its activities and the activities of each transit operator to whom Transportation Development Act funds are allocated. The audits are required to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness and economy of the Commission and the public transit operators and must be conducted in accordance with the guidelines set by the State Comptroller General's Office. Bauer & Associates was the consulting firm selected to conduct the audits. Their findings and recommendations were presented and approved at the Commission's July 14, 2004 meeting. At that time, staff was directed to provide an update on the progress RCTC staff has made on implementing the RCTC audit recommendations. The following is provided as a progress report on the eight recommendations made by Bauer & Associates: • RECOMMENDATION 1: Create a Vision of Transit Service for Riverside County At the May 6, 2004, Commissioners' Workshop in Palm Desert, a ten member Transit Policy Committee (TPC) was created to: 1) guide the preparation of a transit vision; 2) monitor transit implementation; 3) review performance of operators; and 4) bring a regional perspective to transit. Agenda Item 6N 126 • RECOMMENDATION 2: Establish a Transit Subcommittee to Provide Policy • Direction See response to Recommendation No. 1 above. RECOMMENDATION 3: Strengthen Analytical Capabilities to Oversee Operator Performance The Commission receives quarterly operating statistics from the transit operators including operating costs, farebox recovery and ridership. Data is reviewed, a trend analysis performed and the outcome is reported semi- annually to the Commission. However, without pre -established productivity levels there are no benchmarks to compare the available performance data against. Commission staff has met with transit agency representatives to review the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP), which was adopted by the Commission in 1999. Overall consensus from the transit operators was that the PIP is still a valid tool requiring only a few minor adjustments. An overview of the proposed changes will be presented to the TPC; it is anticipated that for FY 2004-05, quarterly operating statistical reports will include PIP data. RECOMMENDATION 4: Clarify the Definition of Revenues to Calculate the • Farebox Ratio Staff developed a Fare Box Recovery Policy, approved at the October 13, 2004 Commission meeting, to clarify the rules and regulations regarding fare box ratios, defining allowable revenues to calculate fare box recovery ratios and summarizing when certain exclusions expire. The Policy has been distributed to the transit operators and the Commission's audit firm. RECOMMENDATION 5: Track the Status of New Transit Services Introduced by the Operators The TDA requires that within 90 days after the end of the first year of implementation of new services, the operator submit a report on the extension of public transportation services, including the area served, the revenues generated and the cost to provide the extended services. A status report will be provided on ridership and operating costs during FY 2004-05 as part of the quarterly operating report. • Agenda Item 6N 127 • • • RECOMMENDATION 6: Request Operators to Submit State Controller Report, Federal National Transit Database, and Federal Triennial Review Report to RCTC Since the beginning of FY 2004-05, transit operators are submitting the required reports. RECOMMENDATION 7: Develop a schedule for the operators to submit annual financial audits and state controller reports RCTC contracts with an audit firm to conduct the annual financial audits of the operators, except for the Riverside Transit Agency. The operators are aware that the annual audits are due by December 31 each year and that the State Controller Reports are due as per State Controller instructions. In order to ensure that the audits and related State Controller Reports are completed and submitted in a timely fashion, an audit plan was prepared for subsequent audit periods commencing with the Fiscal Year 2003-04 audits. The audit plan consisted of a schedule, generally required information for the audit, auditor responsibilities, operator responsibilities and Commission responsibilities and was distributed to the operators at the beginning of FY 2004-05. RECOMMENDATION 8: Develop Flagging System for Notification of Next Employee Appraisal As noted in a previous report to the Commission, supervisors and staff are notified electronically. Notification to the supervisors and staff start as early as six months before the performance appraisal is due and monthly, thereafter. A status report is presented at the management staff meetings. In addition to the notices and reminders, supervisors are reminded on the affects of late performance appraisal on the staff member's benefits. There have been improvements but it is understood that the Administrative Services must continually remind the supervisors and staff to complete their portion of the appraisal process. Agenda Item 6N 128 AGENDA ITEM 60 -101 05 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF ITEM NO. 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Transit Operators' Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and . file the FY 2003-04 Transit Operators' Report. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Under Public Utility Code Section 99244, the Commission must annually identify, analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements, which could lower the cost of transit operations. Part of that process includes the review of ridership data from the public operators. The attached report represents county -wide public transportation ridership, operating and financial information for FY 2003-04 for the eight public operators. A Transit Operator Performance Improvement Program (PIP) was adopted by the Commission and includes the following eight performance indicators: 1) Operating Cost per Revenue Hour - should increase no more than CPI; 2) Farebox Recovery Ratio — per RCTC policy and PUC requirements; 3) Subsidy per Passenger — should increase no more than CPI; 4) Subsidy per Passenger Mile — should increase no more than CPI; 5) Subsidy per Revenue Hour — should increase no more than CPI; 6) Subsidy per Revenue Mile — should increase no more than CPI; 7) Passengers per Revenue Hour - percentage increase consistent with population growth or national average, whichever is greater; and 8) Passengers per Revenue Mile - percentage increase consistent with population growth or national average, whichever is greater. The first two performance indicators: Operating Cost per Revenue Hour and Farebox Recovery Ratio are mandatory per the Public Utilities Code. For FY 2003-04, transit operators have prepared their SRTP's to meet a minimum of three of the remaining six performance indicators. Once the FY 2003-04 financial audits are completed, staff will provide a report on farebox performance which is a State mandate under the Transportation Development Act. Agenda Item 60 129 r As outlined in the PIP, ridership reports are presented to the Commission a minimum of twice a year. Attachment 1 provides data and performance statistics for all eight of the public operators for the period July 1 through June 30, 2004. It should be noted that not all of the operators are tracking all of the performance indicators since, per the PIP, operators have the option of selecting three of the six indicators to track performance. Items not tracked are indicated with an "--"; items that don't apply or where information was not available are indicated as "Not Available" or "Not Applicable". The following table provides summary data on ridership and operating costs per operator: FY 2003-2004 Summary of Ridership and Operating Costs July 1, 2003 — June 30, 2004 Operator Fixed Route Unlinked Passenger Trips Fixed Route Operating Costs per Hour Paratransit Unlinked Passenger Trips Paratransit Operating Costs per Hour Banning 212,634 $70.46 10,130 $36.79 Beaumont 81,520 $41.55 32,163 $45.03 Corona 142,062 $42.12 68,138 $42.89 Commuter Rail 2,458,920 Not Available* Not Applicable Not Applicable Riverside Special Services Not Applicable Not Applicable 157,828 $46.68 PVVTA 28,415 $42.78 11,170 $82.26 RTA 7,362,203 $65.18 226,661 $49.25 SunLine 3,455,798 $91.50 105,967 $58.99 Total/Average 13,741,552 (total trips) $58.93 (average cost) 612,057 (total trips) $51.70 (average cost) The total number of public transportation trips provided by fixed route (bus and rail) and paratransit for FY 2003-04 was 14,353,609. Of those trips, 13,741,552 (96%) were fixed route and 612,057 (4%) were paratransit trips. Operating cost per revenue hour for fixed route service (excludes the cost of commuter rail*) averaged $58.93 per hour. Operating costs ranged from a low of $41.55 (City of Beaumont) to a high of $91.50 (SunLine Transit Agency). Operating cost per revenue hour for paratransit services averaged $51.70. Costs ranged from a low of $36.79 (City of Banning) to a high of $82.26 (Palo Verde Valley). Agenda Item 60 130 *Operating costs per revenue hour information is not available for the Commuter Rail program. Expenses incurred by Commuter Rail are driven by "train miles" or "hours of service" by the train crews not by vehicle hours. During the first two quarters, the operating cost per train mile was $39.90. Attachment: Data and Performance Statistics Agenda Item 60 131 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT FY 2003-2004 FIXED ROUTE - JULY 1 - JUNE 30, 2004 Data Elements - System Wide Total City of Banning Transit City of Beaumont Transit City of Corona Transit Commuter Rail - Riverside Line Commuter Rail - IEOC Line Commuter Rail - 91 Line Palo Verde Valley Transit Riverside Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency Total • All Providers Unlinked Passenger Trips Passenger Miles 212,634 81,520 142,062 1,116,820 913,528 428,572 28,415 7,362,203 3,455,798 13,741,552 Total Actual Vehicles -- -- 470,464 40,749,715 30,412,712 15,353,108 175,884 42,237,579 27,114,347 156,513,809 Revenue Hours Total Actual Vehicle Revenue 10,574 10,396 16,177 19,857 17,728 -- 9,192 471,324 149,540 704,788 Miles Total Actual Vehicle 152,711 136,198 197,050 180,856 200,483 141,713 161,093 7,325,942 2,189,697 10,685,743 Mlles Collisions 157,231 136,827 211,585 -- -- -- 179,220 8,329,237 2,249,453 11,263,553 Total Revenue Vehicle 0 3 0 -- -- -- 2 4 1 10 System Failures Total Valid Passenger 61 6 19 -- -- -- 37 794 175 1,092 Complaints Total Revenue Vehicle Trips 16 11 2 -• -- -- 30 671 344 1,074 Scheduled Total Actual On Revenue 93,026 -- 34,555 -- -- -- 14,095 390,367 155,687 687,730 -Tim e Vehicle Trips Total Operating Expenses 33,946 -- 34,200 13,945 366,471 149,901 598,463 Total Passenger Fare Revenues $745,008 $431,997 $681,357 $11,062,000 $7,807,000 $1,999,500 $393,200 $30,722,972 $13,683,279 $67,526,313 Net Operating Expenses $91,447 $28,509 $99,484 $5,658,195 $4,419,529 $2,027,006 $32,404 $5,364,352 $2,547,630 $20,268,556 (Subsidies) $653 561 $403,488 $581,873 $5,403,805 $3,387,471 $27 506 $360,796 $25,358 620 $11 135,649 $47 257 757 Performance Statistics -System Wide �s " a .. y 4. 'IL.,f'01‘5i-. , ;> ';Y' ! , : ', r r Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Fare Recovery $70.46 $41.55 $42. 12 $557.08 $440. 38 $174.19 $42,78 $65 .18 $91.50° box Ratio Subsidy 12.27% 6.60% 14.60% 51.15% 56.61% 101.38% 8.24% 17.46 % 18.62% per Passenger Subsidy $3.07 $4.95 . $4.10 $5,29 3.92% $0 .57 $12.70 $3 .44 $3.22 per Passenger Mile Subsidy -- -- $1.24 $0.14 $0.11 $0.02 $2.05 $0 .60 $0.41 per Revenue Hour Subsidy $61. 81 $38.81 $35.97 -• -- -- $39.25 $53.80 $74.47 per Revenue Mile Passengers $4. 28 $2.96 $2.95 $29. 88 $16.90 $1.63 $2.24 $3.46 $5.09 , t per Revenue Hour Passengers 20.11 7.84 8.78 3.09 15.62 23,11 per Revenue Miles RevenueCollisions 1. 39 113,386 0.60 45,399 0.72 197,050 5.86 4.56 2.87 0.18 1.00 1.58 On-Time Between Com plaints 98.97% -- 92.00% -- 90.00% -- 0 .88 80,547 98.9% 1,831,486 93.9% 2,189,697 96.28% r T per 1,000 Passengers Total 0. 00008 0.00013 0.00001 -- -- •- 0.00106 0.09114 0.00010 Miles Between Road calls 2,578 22,805 11,136 -- -- -- 4,844 10,490 12,854 132 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM ISSION TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT FY 2003-2004 ADA/PARATRANSIT - JULY 1 - JUNE 30, 2004 Data Elements - System Wide Total City of Banning Transit City of Beaumont Transit ' _City of Corona Transit City of Riverside Specialized Transit Palo Verde Valley Transit Riverside Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency Total - All Providers Unlinked Passenger Trips 10,130 32,163 68,138 157,828 11,170 226,661 105,967 612,057 Passenger Miles -- -- 345,673 642,845 53,146 2,273,410 1,673,824 4,988,898 Total Actual Vehicles Revenue Hours 2,347 7,473 14,730 38,788 3,904 127,176 48,111 242,529 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 43,290 92,202 224,455 642,845 48,193 2,333,851 845,391 4,230,227 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 45,931 96,679 243,516 669,859 53,439 2,333,851 968,621 4,411,896 Collisions 0 0 0 4 3 2 0 9 Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures 7 7 17 18 20 115 38 222 Total Valid Passenger Complaints 3 4 6 0 27 111 286 437 Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled 9,616 -- 68,138 166,122 12,258 222,289 98,369 576,792 Total Actual On -Time Revenue Vehicle Trips 9,422 -- 63,494 157,797 11,542 207,384 89,439 539,078 Total Operating Expenses $86,343 $336,514 $631,830 $1,810,464 $321,133 $6,264,023 $2,837,974 $12,288,281 Total Passenger Fare Revenues $6,483 $30,666 $85,599 $185,332 $24,248 $593,422 $221,067 $1,146,817 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $79,860 $305,848 $546,231 $1,625,132 $296,885 $5,670,601 $2,616,907 $11,141,464 Performance Statistics - System Wide Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $36. 79 $45. 03 $42.89 $46.68 $82.26 $49.25 $58.99 Farebox Recovery Ratio 7.51% 9.11% 13. 55% 10.24% 7.55% 9 .47% 7.79% Subsidy per Passenger $7. 88 $9.51 $8.02 $10.30 $26.58 $25.02 $24.70 ti Subsidy per Passenger Mile -- -- $1.58 $2 .53 $5.59 $2.49 $1.56 Subsidy per Revenue Hour $34. 03 $40. 93 $37.08 $41.90 $76,05 $44.59 $54,39 tar Subsidy per Revenue Mile $1.84 $3. 32 $2.43 $2.53 $6.16 $2.43 $3.10 Passengers per Revenue Hour 4. 32 4.30 4.63 4.07 2.86 1.78 2.20'y, Passengers per Revenue Miles 0.23 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.23 0.10 0.13 Revenue Miles Between Collisions 43,290 92,202 224,455 160,711 -- 1,166,926 845,391 Trips On -Time 98.0% -- 93.2% 95 .0% 94 .2 % 93 .3 % 90.9%�„ Complaints per 1,000 Passengers 0.00030 0.00012 0.00009 0.00000 0.00242 0.48972 0 Total Miles Between Road calls 34,482 13,811 14,324 37,214 -- 20,294 25,490 �3 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Transit Operators' Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the FY 2003-04 Transit Operators' Report. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Under Public Utility Code Section 99244, the Commission must annually identify, analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements, which could lower the cost of transit operations. Part of that process includes the review of ridership data from the public operators. The attached report represents county -wide public transportation ridership, operating and financial information for FY 2003-04 for the eight public operators. A Transit Operator Performance Improvement Program (PIP) was adopted by the Commission and includes the following eight performance indicators: 1) Operating Cost per Revenue Hour - should increase no more than CPI; 2) Farebox Recovery Ratio — per RCTC policy and PUC requirements; 3) Subsidy per Passenger — should increase no more than CPI; 4) Subsidy per Passenger Mile — should increase no more than CPI; 5) Subsidy per Revenue Hour — should increase no more than CPI; 6) Subsidy per Revenue Mile — should increase no more than CPI; 7) Passengers per Revenue Hour - percentage increase consistent with population growth or national average, whichever is greater; and 8) Passengers per Revenue Mile - percentage increase consistent with population growth or national average, whichever is greater. The first two performance indicators: Operating Cost per Revenue Hour and Farebox Recovery Ratio are mandatory per the Public Utilities Code. For FY 2003-04, transit operators have prepared their SRTP's to meet a minimum of three of the remaining six performance indicators. Once the FY 2003-04 financial audits are completed, staff will provide a report on farebox performance which is a State mandate under the Transportation Development Act. Agenda Item 60 129 As outlined in the PIP, ridership reports are presented to the Commission a minimum of twice a year. Attachment 1 provides data and performance statistics for all eight of the public operators for the period July 1 through June 30, 2004. It should be noted that not all of the operators are tracking all of the performance indicators since, per the PIP, operators have the option of selecting three of the six indicators to track performance. Items not tracked are indicated with an "--"; items that don't apply or where information was not available are indicated as "Not Available" or "Not Applicable". The following table provides summary data on ridership and operating costs per operator: FY 2003-2004 Summary of Ridership and Operating Costs July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004 Operator Fixed Route Unlinked Passenger Trips Fixed Route Operating Costs per Hour Paratransit Unlinked Passenger Trips Paratransit Operating Costs per Hour Banning 212,634 $70.46 10,130 $36.79 Beaumont 81,520 $41.55 32,163 $45.03 Corona 142,062 $42.12 68,138 $42.89 Commuter Rail 2,458,920 Not Available* Not Applicable Not Applicable Riverside Special Services Not Applicable Not Applicable 157,828 $46.68 PVVTA 28,415 $42.78 11,170 $82.26 RTA 7,362,203 $65.18 226,661 $49.25 SunLine 3,455,798 $91.50 105,967 $58.99 Total/Average 13,741,552 (total trips) $58.93 (average cost) 612,057 (total trips) $51.70 (average cost) The total number of public transportation trips provided by fixed route (bus and rail) and paratransit for FY 2003-04 was 14,353,609. Of those trips, 13,741,552 (96%) were fixed route and 612,057 (4%) were paratransit trips. Operating cost per revenue hour for fixed route service (excludes the cost of commuter rail*) averaged $58.93 per hour. Operating costs ranged from a low of $41.55 (City of Beaumont) to a high of $91.50 (SunLine Transit Agency). Operating cost per revenue hour for paratransit services averaged 851.70. Costs ranged from a low of $36.79 (City of Banning) to a high of $82.26 (Palo Verde Valley). • • • Agenda Item 60 130 • • • *Operating costs per revenue hour information is not available for the Commuter Rail program. Expenses incurred by Commuter Rail are driven by "train miles" or "hours of service" by the train crews not by vehicle hours. During the first two quarters, the operating cost per train mile was $39.90. Attachment: Data and Performance Statistics Agenda Item 60 131 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COM MISSION TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT • • FY 2003-2004 FIXED ROUTE - JULY 1 - JUNE 30, 2004 Data Elements - System Wide Total City of Banning Transit City of Beaumont Transit City of C orona Transit Commuter Rail - Riverside Line Commuter Rail - IEOC Line Commuter Rail - 91 Line Palo V erde Valley Transit Riverside Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency Total - All Providers Unlinked Passenger Trips 212,634 81,520 142,062 1,116,820 913,528 428,572 28,415 7,362,203 3,455,798 13,741,552 Passenger Miles -- -- 470,464 40,749,715 30,412,712 15,353,108 175,884 42,237,579 27,114,347 156,513,809 Total Actual Vehicles Revenue Hours 10,574 10,396 16,177 19,857 17,728 -- 9,192 471,324 149,540 704,788 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 152,711 136,198 197,050 180,856 200,483 141,713 161,093 7,325,942 2,189,697 10,685,743 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 157,231 136,827 211,585 -- -- -- 179,220 8,329,237 2,249,453 11,263,553 Collisions 0 3 0 -- -- -- 2 4 1 10 Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures 61 6 19 -- -- -- 37 794 175 1,092 Total Valid Passe nger Complaints 16 11 2 -- -- -- 30 671 344 1,074 Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled 93,026 -- 34,555 -- -- -- 14,095 390,367 155,687 687,730 Total Actua l On -Time Reve nue Vehicle Trips 33,946 -- 34,200 -- -- -- 13,945 366,471 149,901 598,463 Total O perating Expenses $745,008 $431,997 $681,357 $11,062,000 $7,807,000 $1,999,500 $393,200 $30,722,972 $13,683,279 $67,526,313 Total Passenger Fare Re venues $91,447 $28,509 $99,484 $5,658,195 $4,419,529 $2,027,006 $32,404 $5,364,352 $2,547,630 $20,268,556 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $653,561 $403,488 $581,873 $5,403,805 $3,387471 -$27,506 $360,796 $25,358,620 $11,135,649 $47,257,757 Performance Statistics - System Wide y �f� �I., ., m,< � \ ' ` `\\\,; ,,��� \ .. l ., .. .... . .... ..,, �\ .,, . It.,, ._ , '<� . �. , ,, � ., x � \� Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $70.46 $41.55 $42.12 $557 .08 $440 .38 $174.19 $42 .78 $65.18 $91 .50' Fare box Recovery Ratio 12. 27% 6.60% 14.60% 51 .15% 56.61% 101.38 % 8.24% 17.46 % 18 .62 % „, r Subsidy per Passenger $3.07 $4.95 $4.10 $5.29 3.92% $0 .57 $12 .70 $3 .44 $3.22 Subsidy per Passenger Mile -- -- $1.24 $0.14 $0.11 $0.02 $2 .05 $0.60 50.41 , f„ Subsidy per Re venue Hour $61.81 $38.81 $35.97 -- -- -- $39.25 $53 .80 $74.47 z, Subsidy per Revenue Mile $4.28 $2.96 $2.95 $29.88 $16.90 $1 .63 $2.24 $3 .46 $5.09 Passengers pe r Revenue Hour 20.11 7.84 8.78 -- -- -- 3 .09 15.62 23 .11 Passengers per Revenue Miles 1.39 0.60 0.72 5.86 4 .56 2.87 0 .18 1.00 1.58 Rev enue Miles Between Collisions 113,386 45,399 197,050 -- -- -- 80,547 1,831,486 2,189,697 % Trips On -Time -- -- 98. 97% 92.00 % 90 .00 % 0.88 98.9% 93 .9% 96.28% Complaints per 1,000 Passengers 0.00008 0. 00013 0.00001 -- -- -- 0.00106 0 .09114 0.00010 Total Miles Betwee n Road calls 2,578 22,805 11,136 -- -- -- 4,844 10,490 12,854 132 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT FY 2003-2004 ADA/PARATRANSIT - JULY 1 - JUNE 30, 2004 Data Elements - System Wide Total Unlinked Passenger Trips Passenger Miles Total Actual Vehicles Revenue Hours Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles Total Actual Vehicle M iles Collisions Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures Total Valid Passenger Complaints Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled Total Actual On -Time Revenue Vehicle Trips Total Operating Expenses Total Passenger Fare Revenues Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) Performance Statistics - System Wide Operating Cost Pe r Revenue Hour Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy per Passenger Subsidy per Passenger Mile Subsidy per Revenue Hour Subsidy per Revenue Mile Passenge rs per Reve nue Hour Passengers per Revenue Miles Revenue Miles Between Collisions % Trips On -Time Complaints per 1,000 Passengers Total Miles Between Road calls City of Banning Transit 10,130 2,347 43,290 45,931 0 7 3 9,616 9,422 $86, 343 $6,483 $79,860 City of Beaumont Transit 32,163 7,473 92,202 96,679 0 7 4 $336,514 $30,666 $305,848 City of Corona Transit 68,138 345,673 14,730 224,455 243,516 0 17 6 68,138 63,494 $631,830 $85,599 $546,231 yo -iversi•e Specialized Transit 157,828 642,845 38,788 642,845 669,859 4 18 0 166,122 157,797 $1,810,464 $185,332 $1,625,132 Palo Verde Valley Transit 11,170 53,146 3,904 48,193 53,439 3 20 27 12,258 11,542 $321,133 $24,248 $296,885 Riverside Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency Total - All Providers 226,661 2,273,410 127,176 2,333,851 2,333,851 2 115 111 222,289 207,384 $6,264,023 $593,422 $5,670,601 105,967 612,057 1,673,824 4,988,898 48,111 242,529 845,391 4,230,227 968,621 4,411,896 0 9 38 222 286 437 98,369 576,792 89,439 539,078 $2,837,974 $12,288,281 $221,067 $1,146,817 $2,616,907 $11,141,464 $36.79 7.51% $7.88 $34. 03 $1.84 4. 32 0.23 43,290 98.0% 0.00030 34,482 $45.03 9.11% $9.51 $40.93 $3.32 4.30 0.35 92,202 0. 00012 13,811 $42.89 13 .55% $8.02 $1.58 $37 .08 $2.43 4 .63 0 .30 224,455 93.2% 0. 00009 14,324 $46.68 10.24% $10.30 $2 .53 $41 .90 $2.53 4 .07 0.25 160,711 95.0% 0.00000 37,214 $82.26 7.55% $26.58 $5.59 $76 .05 $6.16 2 .86 0 .23 94.2 % 0.00242 $49 .25 9 .47% $25.02 $2 .49 $44.59 $2.43 1.78 0.10 1,166, 926 93.3% 0 .48972 20,294 $58.99 7 .79% $24.70 $1 .56 $54.39 $3.10 2.20 0.13 845,391 90 .9% 0 25,490 • •3 • AGENDA ITEM 6P • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: SunLine Transit Agency Operational Evaluation Recommendation Summary STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Operational Evaluation Recommendation Summary which will be presented to the SunLine Transit Agency's Board at its December 1, 2004 meeting. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the Commission's June 11, 2003 meeting, the Commission directed staff to have an independent, internal audit conducted of SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) and SunLine Services Group (SSG). In response, Macias Consulting Group, Inc. (Macias) was hired to perform an operational evaluation of SunLine and SSG. The evaluation report prepared by Macias highlighted five areas and brought forth a total of 52 recommendations for SunLine to implement as the agency corrects previous problems and moves into the future. In response to the recommendations, SunLine prepared the attached matrix which details the 52 recommendations, identifies the corrective action and provides a timeline for resolution. It is anticipated that updates to this report will be presented to the Commission on a monthly basis. Attachment: Operational Evaluation Recommendation Summary Report Agenda Item 6P 134 • SUNLINE TRAIT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2004 COMPLETED ITEMS The fo llowing items have been completed and closed: • RECOMMENDATION CORRECTION DATE TO BOARD AS APPROPRIATE TI ME FRA ME DATE ACCOMP. 3 CFO provide training on ethical issues Ethics policy was adopted April 2004 by board action; training will continue with new HR director . AA Completed April 2004 (policy) 4 CFO maintain finance files that are not available to all staff Files have been moved to secure area, properly labeled as restricted. Additionally fireproof file cabinets have been purchased. AA Completed April 2004 5 CFO establish segregation of duties for AP processing New procedures have been implemented. Mar 04 Completed Mar 04 6 CFO provide for recording receipt (immediate), entering and payment of invoices by AP New procedures have been implemented. AA Completed Apr 04 7 CFO process employee reimbursements at specific times and maintain and no. separately New procedures have been implemented . AA Completed Apr 04 8 CFO implement new petty cash procedures, i. e. , imprest, petty cash vouchers and reconciliation New policy and procedures in place and being followed. Jan 04 Completed Jan 28, 2004 10 CFO provide for IT examination to improve payroll process Work with Payroll to examine process & make recommendations. AA July, Aug 04 Completed August 2004 11 CFO implement policy regarding late timecards not be paid until following pay period Directors ensure timecards received by payroll on time; policy is in place and being followed. AA Completed Feb 2004 12 CFO implement shredding of unsold bus pass stock after reconciliation Procedures have been revised and desk policy is in place. AA Completed Feb 2004 13 GM to establish MOUs between transit and SSG for other services Agreements between SSG and SunLine have been established June 04 June 04 April 28, 2004 19 GM to require monthly financial and update info on projects and provide same to Board Completed Oct 2003 135 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2004 RECOM MENDATION CORRECTION DATE TO BOARD AS APPROPRIATE TIME FRA ME DATE ACCOMP . 21 GM to require Board approval for hiring consultants AA Completed Sept 2003 23 GM to ensure completion of inventory of contracts and grants Inventory of contracts and grants is completed and will be maintained AA Mar 04 Completed Mar 2004 24 CFO establish procedures for maintenance of contracts and grants AA Feb- Mar 04 Completed Apr 2004 25 GM to establish procedures in contract and grant proposal development Grant management policy on Board agenda August 4, 2004 AA July 04 Aug 4, 2004 26 Grants Mgr and SSG Exec Dir to conduct reconciliations at project closeout for each grant Process has been established, and as each project closes, reconciliation will be done. Monthly reconciliation and review being done now with CFO . AA Completed Apr 2004 27 CFO to develop methodology to determine indirect cost allocations Project completed as part of NREL audit, and overhead rates established. AA Completed Mar 2004 30 CFO to plan for Finance staff training in project cost accounting Appropriate training is budgeted in 05 budget AA July 04 Completed early Sept 04 31 GM to create a separate Purchasing, Contract and Grant Management Department Procedures in place for separation of duties; determined that separate Department not efficient for organization; under supervision of CFO and Dir. Of Maintenance. AA Completed Mar 2004 32 GM (or Business Admin Officer) to centralize all purchasing Purchasing centralized under Director of Maintenance supervision AA Completed Mar 2004 33 Purchasing management process to require annual physical inventories Use current software to provide greater detail of fixed assets vs. equipment inventory. Annual inventory taken June, 2004. Regular monthly physical inventories now being taken. AA June 04 Completed 6/30/04 34 GM to establish IT policies and procedures with emphasis on security, including HR's involvement regarding departing employees IT audit completed, IT policies adopted by Board 6/04 Jun 04 Jun 04 Completed 6/23/04 • 06 • • SUNLINE TROT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECE MBER 2004 • RECOMMENDATION CORRECTION DATE TO BOARD AS APPROPRIATE TIME FR AME DATE ACCOMP. 35 GM to implement updating employee authorization to the core system IT audit completed, IT policies adopted by Board 6/04 Jun 04 Jun 04 Completed 7/04 36 GM to cancel RFP to purchase computers with Windows 98 operating system Order proceeds; Windows 98 necessary to operate current software . Management declined recomendation December 03 37 GM to ensure changes to the shared key for the VPM tunnel Process completed Completed Dec 03 38 GM to ensure that IT establishes a net work administration account IT audit completed; this has been accomplished AA June 04 Completed 7/04 39 GM to ensure that Novell's NLM be enabled Completed AA June 04 July 2004 40 GM to establish control policies and procedures for entering changes into system Policies adopted 6/23/04 and in place AA June 04 July 2004 41 GM to remove GM assistants' access to server room 12/23/03 42 GM to prohibit network administrator from tracking user passwords Instructions for corrections issued by Acting GM 1/16/04 44 CFO to utilize the table -logging feature to capture change to tables affecting financial transactions IT system changes now control levels of access for table changes, and revisions are tracked by software. AA Sept 04 Completed July & Aug 2004 45 CFO to utilize financial system to control funds to prevent commitments that exceed balances Fleet -Net system now contains '05 budget numbers, which monitors spending levels by account. AA Sept 04 Completed Auc 2004 46 CFO to utilize feature to record accrued liabilities upon receipt of invoices All liabilities are entered upon receipt of inventory in order to track a ccrued liabilities. AA June 04 Completed April 2004 47 GM to ensure Finance managers allowed access to system statistics and reports generated All directors and managers are allowed access to system reports as appropriate, based upon IT audit and new policies AA Fall 04 Completed August 04 48 CFO to establish a budget process system, to include a budget committee, 3 years of prior comparisons, estimates to actuals, etc. New GM and CFO have established process for FY 2005 June & July 04 Completed Jul 2004 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION SUM MARY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECE MBER 2004 RECOMMENDATION CORRECTION DATE TO BOARD AS APPROPRIATE TIME FRAME DATE ACCOMP. 49 GM, CFO & Directors to address forecasted budget projections of a $1.5M deficit. See Note No . 1 Feb 04 Not applicable 50 CFO to implement corrective action to address SunLine and SSG fiscal concerns Staff report to Board on April 28, 2004; RCTC approved asset transfer 7/14/04 May 04 May 04 Completed 7/14/04 51 CFO to develop formal debt management policies to establish permissible debt levels Line of credit cancelled at bank; no other new debt allowed Not applicable 52 CFO to create aging payable reports to forecast cash flow and to communicate status to Board Cash flow forecasts, projections, and accounts payable status reviewed at least weekly AA Completed Mar 04 NOTES: No. 1 (Recommendation 49): No 2. (IT recommendations): The $1.5M number was a computer -generated projected number based on auditor's software and prior 3 - year financial history. Changes already adopted for current year have reduced expenditures dramatically . Pending final year end closing, SunLine completed FY 2004 within budget. The Board authorized an IT audit, which was completed in May and June, 2004. New IT policies were adopted 6/23/04, and are in place. New network software and hardware has been ordered, and major system re -structuring is under way. Fleet -Net, the Agency's operations software, is testing a new version of its software, and from their promotional literature, it promises to have significant improvements. Staff will evaluate the new software in FY 2005. In the meantime, additional Fleet -Net training is budgeted in FY 2005. Staff is also evaluating the Agency's other important software resources, including GFI and Trapeze, for possible improved use or needed upgrades. This is an expensive upgrade, and is being evaluated for feasibility in current year or following year. • *8 • • SUNLINE TROT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION SU MMARY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECE MBER 2004 ONGOING ITEMS • RECOMMENDATION CORRECTION DATE TO BOARD AS APPROPRIATE TI ME FRA ME DATE ACCO MP . 1 CFO de velop finance department policies and procedures manual All policies and procedures are being reviewed, and a number of them have been revised by Board adoption. As Appropriate Began Feb 04 & ongoing Ongoing 2 CFO hold periodic meetings and provide staff training A number of training issues have been identified, and appropriate training costs will be included in the 2005 Budget . Other issues are currently being trained on a case by case basis. As Appropriate (AA) Mar -April 04 Training is ongoing 9 Board to periodically require an independent evaluation of internal controls Macias group will re-evaluate SunLine in one year, per RCTC action 7/14/04 Fall 2005 Summer 2005 Planned return 1/05 20 GM to provide agency initiatives and activities to staff In progress Aug 04 Ongoing 22 HR Director to administer annual ethics training; policy included in employee handbook To be included in new employee handbook, see #14 above. Some training already taking place AA Apr 04 In progress 28 GM to implement project management module in core financial management system Establishment of project mgmt module has begun July 04 Ongoing, begun July/04 139 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY OPERATIONAL EVALUATION RECOM MENDATION SUMMARY REPORT F OR THE MONTH OF DECE MBER 2004 OPEN ITEMS RECOM MENDATION CORRECTION DATE TO BOARD AS APPROPRIATE TI ME FRAME DATE ACCO MP . 14 HR Director update and distribute employee handbook In process AA Summer 2005 In process with new HR Director 15 HR Director to develop job descriptions for all positions In process AA June 04 16 HR Director to conduct job position audits Dept. directors and HR to audit job positions with employee annual reviews. AA Jun 04 17 HR Director provide employee compensation plan and annual review of salaries In process May 04 May 04 18 HR Director identify training needs of staff Directors to identify their department training requirements and work with HR to implement in 05 budget May 04 May 04 29 HR Director plan for staff involved with contracts and grants to have training on regulations See #18 above AA June 04 • sto • AGENDA ITEM 6Q RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the County of Riverside STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the FY 2004-05 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the County of Riverside. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of local streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive its Measure "A" disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. The Measure "A" Plan for the County of Riverside was approved by the Commission at its July 14, 2004 meeting. Any revisions to the adopted plan must be returned to the Commission for approval. The County of Riverside has submitted a revised plan for FY 2004-05 to include projects which were incorporated into the County's FY 2004-05 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 19, 2004. Attachment: County of Riverside Revised FY 2004-05 Measure "A" Plan Agenda Item 6Q 141 69679 JR • COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department October 28, 2004 Eric Haley, Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 S. Lemon St., Third floor Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Attn.: Mr. Jerry Rivera Dear Mr. Haley: George A. Johnson, P.E. Director of Transportation 1-TE©EIFY9 - u OCT 26 2004 TRANSPORTATION RIVERSIDE COMMISSION On October 19, 2004, the Board of Supervisors approved the FY 2004/2005 County of Riverside Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Attached is an updated five year program of projects for the County's portion of Measure "A" funds as incorporated into the recently approved TIP. This five year program supersedes the previous report approved by the RCTC on July 14, 2004. If there are any questions concerning this program, please contact Mr. Juan Perez, Deputy Director of Transportation, at (909) 955-2057. Sincerely, George'A. Johnson Director of Transportation RKN: attachment cc: Juan Perez Scott Barber/Russ Kennedy Roy Null (transmittal only) 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor • Riversid C lifornia 92501 • (909) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 • Riverside, California 2-1090 • FAX (909) 955-3198 X.29.19 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • Page 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) Supv.Dist EW (ft)/PW (ft) 04th St St Hwy 111 .54 (mi) Recon AC paved road Dale Killer Rd 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 4 05th St Lincoln St .48 (mi) Recon AC paved road Dale Killer Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 05th St Ramona Expy .37 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.37 mi 21 (ft)/ 21 (ft) 5 06th St Lincoln St .16 (mi) Recon AC paved road Coahuitta St 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 12th St North Dr .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wren Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 5 16th Ave Attantic Ave .23 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply to end 16 (ft)/ 16 (ft) 5 20th Ave Intake Blvd 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply 1.00 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other 195 195 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmentat C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 9 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 185 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 144 144 62 62 D E R C 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 137 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 61 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 46 46 50 Total 301 other Total 302 other Total 50 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 43 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 47 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 55 190 190 D E R C 2 1 12 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 187 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist 20th St Avalon St .39 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.39 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 2 20th St Rubidoux Blvd .13 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Avalon St 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 2 22nd Ave SH 78 1.02 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 1.02 mi 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 24th Ave Buck Blvd 1.50 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road SH 78 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 35th St Arora St .11 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wallace St 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 36th St Valley Wy .16 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Skylane Dr 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 300 other Total 300 other Total 302 other 132 132 62 62 73 Total 302 other Total 73 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 1 08/09 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 129 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 59 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 265 265 D E R C 2 1 0 262 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 other Total 300 other Total 45th St Opal St .34 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.34 mi 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 2 300 other Total 42 42 66 66 172 172 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 63 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 159 144 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist 46th St Riverview Dr SE'ly 800' .15 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Reconst and Widen AC Paved Road 2 51st Ave Jackson St .99 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Van Buren St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 4 51st St Beach St .62 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Felspar St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 52nd Ave Monroe St .72 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly side Indio C.L. 13 (ft)/ 13 (ft) 4 58th Ave Jackson St 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Van Buren St 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 4 301 other Total 301 other Total 61st St Felspar St East End .12 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 2 64th Ave Pierce St .83 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily SH 111 0.52 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 142 142 174 174 125 125 75 75 198 198 27 27 159 159 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 0 0 35 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 1 105 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 171 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 2 0 122 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 195 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 21 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 156 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.D1st 71st Ave Colfax St Hayes .50 (mi) (ft)/ 26 (ft) Pave dirt road to meet AQMD Reg.s 4 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 72nd Ave Fillmore St .50 (mi) (ft)/ 26 (ft) Pave dirt road to meet AOMD Reg.s 4 Acacia Ave Columbia St 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Meridian St 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 3 Acorn Ln Sylvan Wy .31 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road SW'ty 0.31 mi 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 301 other Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmentat C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 08/09 143 143 143 143 292 Total 300 other Total 292 74 74 Ainsworth Pl Amorose St .13 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.13 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 300 other Total Albatross Way Vander Veer Rd .24 (mi) Resurface AC paved road 72nd Ave 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 Alberta Ave Swingle Ave .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wly 0.15 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 4 301 other Total 301 other Total 25 25 24 24 48 48 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 2 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 141 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 0 0 E 2 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 141 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 289 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 00 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 21 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 10 E 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 37 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 • • • 146 111/1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Alpine Way Palm Oasis Ave .20 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ty Overture 0.05 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 5 Alvarado St Machado St .77 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Grand Ave 41 (ft)/ 41 (ft) 1 Amado Ln Orange St .17 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Cameron Ln 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Amber Ln 3 Diamond Dr Ply Diamond Dr 0.07mi .07 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Amberton Dr Waite St .10 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ply 0.10 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 1 Amberwood Ct Woodcrest Dr .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.08 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Amorose St Grand Ave .74 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ply & W'ly 0.74 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 67 67 156 156 30 30 24 24 22 22 19 19 120 120 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 t 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 2 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 64 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 2 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 153 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 E 1 R 0 C 27 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 19 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 16 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 119 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Andra Cir 4 301 Forest Dr N'ly 0.02 mi .02 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road other Total Antonia Pt 2 300 La Rue St Ply 0.10 mi .10 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 9 9 31 31 Apela Dr 3 300 Idyllmont Rd Wily Idyllmont 0.60 mi .60 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other 96 Total Arnold Ln 1 300 Palomar St Charles St .28 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total Asa Wy 2 300 Ave Juan Bautista Ely & Wly .17 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total Atlantic Ave 5 301 Dillon Rd 16th Ave .49 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total Audelo St 1 300 Alvarado St N'ly 0.07 mi .07 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 96 47 47 53 53 93 93 15 15 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 8 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 28 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 93 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 44 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 49 D 2 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 R 25 0 0 0 C 65 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 14 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 148 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Ave De Palma Pinto St .33 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Golden West Ave 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Total 2 300 125 Ave Juan Bautista Limonite Ave Riverview Dr .50 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 125 2 300 96 Ave Juan Bautista Ave De Palma .31 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 45th St 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) other Total 96 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmentat C = Construction 04/05 ( 05/06 106/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 9 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 116 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 86 2 300 134 Ave San Timoteo Orchard St .86 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Avenida Miravilla 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) other Total 134 5 300 166 Avenida Bravura De Portola Rd .95 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.95 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) other Total 166 3 300 218 Avenida Miravilla Vineland St 1.50 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ave San Timoteo 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) other Total 218 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 124 D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 163 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 215 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 300 128 Avenida Ortega Chaparral Dr .48 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road W'ly 0.48 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) other Total 128 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 125 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 300 93 other Total 93 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 90 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Avenida Sonrisa Ave Miravilla .30 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Avenida Valencia Ave Juan Bautista .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 5 Ave San Timoteo 21 (ft)/ 21 (ft) 2 W'ty End 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Azurite St 61st St "Ply 0.24 mi .24 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 2 Bahrman Rd SH 371 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Mitchell Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Bain St San Sevain Wy .25 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Union St 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) 2 Balsam Ln Ridgeview Terr .07 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Nly End 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 28 28 53 53 77 77 127 127 65 100 165 34 34 Barton St Nandina Ave .51 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Mariposa Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 300 other Total 146 146 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 25 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 49 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 124 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R c 35 2 0 2 0 0 0 26 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 143 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 150 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUND Fiscal years 2005-2009 • Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) Bataan St 48th Ave .16 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Beatrice Dr La Canada Dr .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Beaumont Ave Orchard St .22 (mi) Resurf RMS paved roac Beazley Ln Lawson Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Bellegrave Ave Mission Blvd .28 (mi) Grind and Resurf 0.12 Bicknell Ln Marian View Dr .07 (mi) Resurf RMS paved roac Big Springs Ranch Rd Thornton Ave .35 (mi) Resurf AC paved road ORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM Page 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Supv.Dist EW (ft)/PW (ft) 4 N'ly 0.16 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 2 Rodeo Dr 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 5 Oak Glen Rd 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) 1 Wily 0.14 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Avon St 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) ' AC 2 3 South Circle Dr 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 3 S'ly 0.35 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 41 41 57 57 34 34 51 51 34 34 11 11 133 133 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 38 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 54 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 33 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 28 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 2 1 0 8 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 2 1 0 130 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Bluff St River Rd Stage Coach Dr .95 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) Resurf AC paved road and coordinate with the City of Norco for project funding. 2 Bold Ruler Ln 2 Dapple Ln Wily Dapple Ln 0.23 mi .23 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Bold Ruler Ln Wily Dapple Ln 0.23 mi .31 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.31 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 Box Canyon Rd SW SheepHole Oasis 2mi 4.03 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Garfield Rd 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) 4 Box Canyon Rd Sly Shavers Well .18mi 4.10 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road SW SheepHole Oasis 2mi 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) 4 Brookside Ave Nancy Ave Beaumont Ave .80 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Verify limits of proposed annexation. 5 Brookstone Ln Toft Dr .19 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Cobblestone Ln 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 431 379 810 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 1 08/09 D 5 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 49 0 0 0 0 C 377 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 32 32 119 119 484 484 737 737 117 117 35 35 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 31 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 118 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 481 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 734 0 0 01 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 8 1 0 108 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 32 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • Page 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Brownstown Dr Orcabessa Dr Ewarton Rd .16 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 Butternut Ln Ridgeview Terrace .06 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.06 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Cabazon Ave Dillon Rd .03 (mi) Recon AC paved road Indio C.L. 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) 4 Cajalco Rd La Sierra Ave 3.00 (mi) Recon AC paved road Lake Mathews Dr 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Cajalco Rd La Sierra Ave 2.70 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Temescal Canyon Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 Cajalco Rd E'ty La Sierra 1 mi Ply La Sierra 2 mi .31 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Guard rail at three locations 1 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Calle De Las Flores Clearwater Wy .31 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Snow View Dr 17 (ft)/ 17 (ft) 5 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 64 64 31 31 22 22 527 1780 2307 1700 1700 62 135 197 51 51 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 107/08 ( 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 5 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 59 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 132 10 0 3 0 0 0 382 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 180 20 0 0 0 0 0 1500 D E R C 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 48 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Cameron Ln Amado Ln .05 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.05 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 1 300 13 Camino Larado Dr Avenida Ortega .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.25 mi 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) other Total 13 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 10 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 3 300 52 Camino Montura Union St .09 (mi) Resurf AC paved road NE'ly 0.09 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) other Total 52 2 300 35 Campbell St Granite Hill Dr .43 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.43 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) other Total 35 2 300 157 Cashew St Como St .51 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wesley St 39 (ft)/ 39 (ft) other Total 157 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 49 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 34 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 154 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 300 86 Cecil St Ella Ave .12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly 0.12 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) other Total 86 4 301 36 Cedar St 53rd St .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 51st St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) other Total 36 D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 83 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 33 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 300 52 other Total 52 D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 49 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 154 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Cherry Ave Brookside Ave Cherry Valley Blvd 1.14 (mi) 39 (ft)/ 39 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Width varies from 32' to 39'. Cherry Cove Calle De Las Flores .14 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Chevy Chase Rd Ridgemoor Rd .19 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Carmel Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Chickory Dr Seven Springs Wy .46 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Scottsdale Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Citrus Ave Webster Ave .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.21 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Clark St Cajalco Rd 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Martin St 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Clearview PI 45th St .15 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Agate St 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Fund Source Total 5 300 other Total 5 301 other Total 3 300 other Total 1 300 other Total 1 300 other Total 1 300 other Total 2 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 187 187 47 47 75 75 77 77 63 63 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 2 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 184 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 44 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 74 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 76 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 60 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 296 296 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 296 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 21 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Clearwater Way 5 Calle De Las Flores S'ly Palm Oasis 0.05mi .16 (mi) 17 (ft)/ 17 (ft) Resurf RMS pave road Cleveland St SH 111 .30 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'Ly 0.30 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 4 Clinton Keith Rd N'ly Avenida La Cresta .57 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Install metal beam guardrail 1 Clinton St Miles Ave S'ly to C.L. .25 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf W 1/2 road & research widening 4 Coachella Valley Area various roads 6.00 (mi) Resurf (ft)/ (ft) 4 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total Cobblestone Ln Rockridge Rd .16 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Brookstone Ln 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 Colt St Prairie Wy .17 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.17 mi 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) 1 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 29 29 54 54 102 102 345 345 1050 850 1900 29 29 17 17 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 0 = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 1 08/09 D 0 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 26 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 53 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 0 0 0 E 2 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 100 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 35 2 0 0 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 650 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 400 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 26 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 156 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Concordia Ranch Rd Temescal Cyn Rd .75 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ply 0.75 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 1 Copper Queen Ln El Mineral Rd .78 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Piedras Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Coral St 5 Calle De Las Flores S'ly Palm Oasis 0.05mi .19 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Cordova Dr Chaparral Dr .35 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Via De Oro 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 3 300 other Total Cornell St Crest Dr .45 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.45 mi 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) 3 Cornell St SH 74 Crest Dr 1.60 (mi) 39 (ft)/ 39 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Width varies from 33' to 39'. 3 Corregidor Ave Van Buren St .24 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Bataan St 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 246 246 136 136 62 62 72 72 110 Total 300 other Total 301 other 110 619 619 72 Total 72 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 1 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 243 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 135 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 59 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 69 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 109 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 2 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 616 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 69 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Corydon St Grand Ave Mission Tr 1.56 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon AC paved road 1/2 in the City of Lake Elsinore. Pursue coop w/City. Add left turn Lane at Union Street. 1 Country Hills Ln Orchard View Ln Praed St .14 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 1 Cramer St Alpine Wy Range View Dr .14 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Width varies from 34' to 63'. 5 Crestview Dr Marian View Dr .78 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road SW'ly 0.78 mi 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 3 Croham Hurst Ct Prestwick Rd .02 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.02 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 Crop Rd Sussex Rd .16 (mi) Resurf AC paved road SW'ly 0.16 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Crystal Springs Dr Calle De Las Flores .15 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 520 341 861 25 25 58 58 113 113 13 13 34 34 50 50 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 13 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 507 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 22 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 2 0 55 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 110 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 31 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2 E 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 47 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 • • • 158 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Dapple Ln Thorobred Ln .18 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Galena St 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 2 Dartmouth St Mayberry Ave .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Acacia Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 3 Date Palm Ave Elm St .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Clinton St 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 26 De Frain Blvd I-10 06th Ave 3.75 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC road in select areas & Const turn lanes at Hobson Way. Partly in the City of Blythe. Additional funds are needed. 4 De Frain Blvd 24th Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 22nd Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 De La Lama St Alvarado St .06 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ty 0.06 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 De La Vista Vista De Oro NW'ly Riverview 0.05mi .13 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 2 302 other Total 302 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 26 68 68 63 63 88 810 898 138 138 14 14 37 37 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 108/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 60 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 39 2 0 3 0 0 0 44 D 0 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 135 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 13 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 36 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist De La Vista Pacific Ave .19 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.19 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 De Luz Rd Rancho California Rd 2.17 (mi) Recon AC paved road Carancho Rd 22 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 1 Del Monte Dr Annandale Rd .68 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ridgemoor Rd 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 3 Delgado Wy Parado Del Sol Dr .20 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.20 mi 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 3 Descanso Dr Cornell St .17 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.17 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 3 Desertaire Dr Parkside Dr .44 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.44 mi 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) 4 Dexter Ave Crane St Lake Elsinore C.L. .34 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Funds shown are for the County's 1/2 of road. Coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore to 5 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 57 57 816 816 237 237 43 43 45 Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 45 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 0 = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 56 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 81 0 E 0 0 0 3 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 2 730 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 0 234 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 40 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 63 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 62 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 42 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 39 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • e 160 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 19 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Diamond Dr Garnet Ln .15 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Emerald Ln 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 3 Double Tree Dr Jeffery Pine Rd .15 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Silver Fir Dr 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 3 Downey St Limonite Ave .11 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 61st St 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 Dutton St Noble St .97 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Bellflower Ave 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 5 Eagle Mountain Rd N'ly I-10 3.31 mi 3.53 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly 1-10 6.84 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 4 Edgehill Dr 36th St .08 (mi) Recon AC paved road S'ly 0.08 mi 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) 2 El Mineral Rd 1 El Toro Rd Wty Vanderbilt 0.19 mi .91 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Width varies from 29' to 40'. Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 44 44 41 Total 300 other Total 41 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 1 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 43 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 34 104 104 607 607 42 42 153 153 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 38 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 31 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 101 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 604 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley IO w K U 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 152 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist El Nido Rd Piedras Rd .44 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly 0.44 mi 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 El Rivino Blvd Rubidoux Blvd Agua Mansa Rd 1.20 (mi) 13 (ft)/ 13 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Co-op with County of San Bernardino 2 El Sobrante Rd Mockingbird Canyon Rd .13 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 44 (ft) Const Left Turn Lane on eastbound El Sobrante Rd. Recon existing pavement 1 Ella Ave Calhoun St .50 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Jackson St 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 4 Emerald Ln 3 E Newport Rd Sly E Newport Rd .12mi .12 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Equestrian Ln Sussex Rd .09 (mi) Resurf AC paved road SW'ly 0.09 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Estrada Dr 2 S'ly Via Curva 0.02 mi N'ly End .16 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 85 85 400 395 795 277 93 370 42 42 39 39 21 21 65 65 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 84 0 300 Measure A/Western D 23 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 377 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 277 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 18 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 60 • • 162 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Estrada Dr 2 45th St S'ly Via Curva 0.02 mi .14 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Fund Source Total 300 other Total Ethanac Rd Goetz Rd Burnett Rd 1.75 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Recon road and add continuous left turn lane 3 300 other Total Ewarton Rd Brownstown Dr Lima Hall Rd .00 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 Exmoor Ct 3 Glen Oaks Dr Ply Glen Oaks 0.02 mi .02 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Falling Water Wy Seven Springs Wy .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.12 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Felspar St Jurupa Rd .97 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Mission Blvd 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) 2 Filly Ln Bold Ruler Ln .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply 0.25 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 58 58 656 808 1464 43 43 12 12 22 22 567 567 300 other Total 35 35 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 54 D E R C 44 0 0 612 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 3 0 0 40 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 564 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 34 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 22 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fleming St Granite Hill Dr .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road ?Ply 0.21 mi 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total Florine Ave SE'ly 34th St 0.02 mi .16 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road SE'ly 34th St 0.18 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 2 300 other Total Forest Dr Pacific Ave .19 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily End 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 4 301 other Total Forest Hill Dr Crestview Dr .12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.12 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 300 other Total Fox Glen Rd Mockingbird Cyn Rd .33 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Sussex Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Foxgrove Rd Waverly Dr .20 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Del Monte Dr 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 300 other Total 300 other Total Fred Waring Dr Jefferson St Adams St 1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road Coordinate with City of La Ouinta for S'ly half of road. 4 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 41 41 35 35 84 84 18 18 60 60 63 63 305 305 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 38 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 32 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 6 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 78 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 15 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 57 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 282 • • • 164 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Front Hall Rd 42nd Ave N'ly 0.12 mi .12 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 Galbreth Dr Kimdale Dr .17 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Kalsman Dr 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 5 Garber Dr 5 Kimdale Dr Nly Kimdale Dr 0.09 mi .09 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Garfield Ave Spring St Center St .24 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Widen and Resurf RMS paved road 5 Garnet Ln 3 E Newport Rd Sly E Newport Rd .18mi .18 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Gentian Ave Prairie Wy .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.12 mi 43 (ft)/ 43 (ft) 1 Gila Wy Colt St .24 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Hermosa St 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 53 53 23 23 15 15 53 53 55 55 62 62 42 42 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 49 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 50 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 59 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 41 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 24 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Gilman Springs Rd NW'ly Jack Rabbit Tr SE'Ly Bridge St 1.80 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Reconst and widen AC Paved Road Built with project A2-0433 in Supv. Dist 3. 5 Gilman Springs Rd SE'ly Bridge St 1.50 (mi) Reconst AC Paved Rd SH 79 (Sanderson Rd) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 5 Gilman Springs Rd Sh 79 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Const right turn lanes Design done by RCTC. Combine with County project A70348 for construction. 5 Glen Oaks Dr Foxgrove Rd .44 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Del Monte Dr 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 Glenoaks Rd Rancho California Rd 2.76 (mi) Recon AC paved road E'ty 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 Gold Strike Cir El Mineral Rd .07 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'Ly 0.07 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Golden Star Ave Washington St 1.04 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Riverside C.L. 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 5 5 2809 2809 212 100 312 133 133 1308 1308 16 16 70 70 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 5 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 E 4 0 0 R 15 0 0 C 2790 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 212 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 132 0 0 0 0 D 15 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 1293 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 • • • 166 S RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 25 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Golden West Ave Ave Juan Bau. 1.23 (mi) Recon AC paved road Huntsman St 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 2 Golondrina St Machado St .18 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.18 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Grand Ave Corydon St Pasadena 2.75 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 1 Grandview Ave Patty St .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.21 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 2 Grant Ave SH 74 .17 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Palm Ave 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 3 Grant St SH 111 .77 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 70th Ave 0.32 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Grant St Hammond Rd 66th Ave 1.51 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Width varies from 23' to 25'. 4 Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 712 712 35 35 245 245 49 49 Total 15 15 147 147 289 289 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 108/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 1 0 659 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 32 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 242 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 46 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 12 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 144 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 286 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 26 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Grove St Orange St .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Cherry St 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) 1 Gum Tree Dr Lawson Rd .28 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.28 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Hadley Wy Kimdale Dr .19 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Kalsman Dr 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 5 Halbrent Ave Kimdale Dr .19 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Kalsman Dr 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 5 Hall Ave Hail Ave .10 (mi) Recon RMS paved road 28th St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 2 Harley John Rd Mockingbird Cyn Rd .96 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly Scottsdale 0.1 mi 44 (ft)/ 44 (ft) Harness Rd Sussex Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road SW'ly 0.14 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 28 28 100 100 28 28 28 28 28 28 351 351 30 30 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 1 08/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 25 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 97 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 25 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 348 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 27 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 168 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 27 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Hastings Blvd Lindsay St .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.15 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 Helen Ave Clinton Ave .40 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wly 0.4 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 4 Hemet Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf AC paved roads (ft)/ (ft) 3 Hermosa St Gila Wy .13 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Prairie Wy 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 High Country Cir Olive St .22 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Western Crest Dr 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 Highgrove Area various streets .00 (mi) Resurf AC paved road (ft)/ (ft) 5 Hill St Mitchell Rd 1.03 (mi) Const RMS paved road N'ly 1.03 mi 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 60 60 101 101 2200 1450 3650 23 23 45 45 2270 1000 3270 340 340 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 108/09 0 E R C 2 0 57 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 90 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 400 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 1000 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nAmol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 200 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 600 200 270 1000 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 337 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Hogan Dr Par Dr .25 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Olympia Wy 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) 3 Holly Dr Purple Sage Dr .11 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Sterling Ave 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 5 Hunt Rd Knabe Rd .32 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Lawson Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 Jameson Dr SH 243 .51 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Pine Crest Ave 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Jennie St Patty St .17 (mi) Resurf AC paved road NE'ly 0.17 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Jennifer Dr Como St .32 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Walnut St 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 Joel Dr La Canada Dr .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Rodeo Dr 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 85 85 40 40 92 92 112 112 49 49 106 106 47 47 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 1 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 84 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 37 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 89 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 109 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 46 00 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 103 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 44 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 170 111/1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 29 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Johnson Rd Marantha Dr .03 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly 0.03 mi 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 Johnson St 82nd Ave .52 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 81st Ave 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 Johnston Ave Soboba St .76 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.76 mi 21 (ft)/ 21 (ft) 3 Juniper Flats Rd Stagecoach Rd 2.16 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Juniper Springs Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 5 Kalsman Dr Rushmore Ave .39 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Kimdale Dr 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 5 Kelton Ct Kalsman Dr .06 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.06 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 5 Kimdale Dr Rushmore Ave .54 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.54 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 5 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 13 13 101 101 128 128 407 407 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 10 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 56 56 12 12 300 other Total 74 74 D E R C 2 0 125 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 404 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 55 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 11 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 73 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 30 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist King Ave Van Buren Blvd Krameria Ave .16 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Recon AC paved road Coordinate with traffic signal project B20471 Van Buren & King 1 Knabe Rd Hunt Rd .35 (mi) Widen road to 4 lanes Gardenia Dr 26 (ft)/ 60 (ft) 1 Krameria Ave Gamble Wy .13 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.13 mi 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) 1 La Canada Dr La Rue St .05 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Muriel Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 La Canada Dr La Rue St .30 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily Joel Dr 0.03 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 66 66 300 other 75 170 Total 300 other Total 300 other 245 40 40 25 Total 300 other 25 53 Total 53 La Reta Wy Kenneth St .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.08 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 La Rue St Canal St .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Paramount Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 300 other Total 300 other Total 32 32 80 80 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 66 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 10 0 0 0 0 C 65 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 39 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 22 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 50 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 77 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 172 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 31 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist La Rue St Mustang Ln .26 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Canal St 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total La Sierra Ave El Sobrante Rd Cleveland Ave 1.90 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 64 (ft) Widen to 4 lane Mtn. Arterial Hwy Agreement with Victoria Grove,LLC. 1 La Vida Dr Calle De Las Flores .18 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Ladera Vista Dr Chaparral Dr .16 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply 0.16 mi 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 3 Lakeview Ave Kelsey Pl .12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Studio Pl 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Lamar Ct Prairie Wy .06 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.06 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Lasso Ct Corral St S'ly Corral 0.05 mi .05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 2 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total tuna Source Amount x $1000 70 70 435 4516 4951 59 59 36 36 24 24 14 14 14 14 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 67 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 17 30 0 388 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 56 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 33 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 21 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 13 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 5 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 8 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 32 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Laurel Dr La Canada Dr .23 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Paramount Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 Lawson Rd Temescal Cyn Rd .74 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Hunt Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 Legend Ln Pachea Tr .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Thornton Ave 39 (ft)/ 39 (ft) 3 Lemon Ave Webster Ave .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.21 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Lemon Grove Ave Estrada Dr Golden West Ave .08 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 2 Lemon St Loquat St .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road I-15 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Leon Rd 5 S'y Quail Hollow .07mi N'ly Oak Valley .08 mi .30 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Fund Source Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 88 Total 300 other Total 300 other 88 211 211 56 Total 300 other Total 56 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 85 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 208 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 53 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 63 63 300 other Total 300 other 32 32 73 Total 73 300 other 42 Total 42 D E R C 2 1 0 60 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 30 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 72 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 39 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e • • 174 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 33 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Leyte Ave Van Buren St .16 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Ply 0.16 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 4 Limonite Ave/Riverview Dr Morton Ave Mission Blvd 4.10 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road 2 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Linda Vista Ln Waite St .10 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.10 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 1 Lindsay St Granite Hill Dr .33 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly 0.33 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 2 Lingayan Ave Van Buren St .24 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Bataan St 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 4 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 52 52 15 58 73 22 Total 300 other Total 22 32 32 301 other Total 79 79 Lois Ln Krameria Ave .13 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.13 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 Los Ranchos Cir Via De Oro 1.01 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Chaparral Dr 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 300 other Total 300 other Total 18 18 207 207 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 08/09 D E R C 2 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 19 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 29 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inwcec.0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 18 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 204 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 34 10/20/2004 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 08/09 Lucero Dr 3 Los Ranchos Cir ?Ply 0.16 mi .16 (mi) 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 14 D E R C 2 1 0 11 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 14 Luna Dr 3 Cordova Dr Wily 0.13 mi .13 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 28 D E R C 2 1 0 25 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 28 Luzon St 4 Manila Ave 48th Ave .24 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Recon RMS paved road 301 other 74 D E R C 301 2 1 0 71 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 74 Machado St 1 Grand Ave N'ly Alvarado 0.04 mi .56 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 286 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 2 1 0 283 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 286 Macheka Dr 5 Mirileste Dr Penasco Cir .08 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 31 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 1 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 31 Magdalene Ct 1 Golondrina St S'ly 0.15 mi .15 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 27 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 2 1 0 24 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 27 Manila Ave 4 Van Buren St Ply 0.16 mi .16 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) Recon RMS paved road 301 other 47 D E R C 301 2 1 0 44 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 47 • • • 176 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 35 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comment$) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Manor Dr 34th St .30 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 36th St 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 2 Maple Tree Ln Windtree Ave .07 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.07 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Marantha Dr Pine Crest Ave .13 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.13 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 3 Mare Cir Filly Ln .03 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.03 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 2 Marion Ridge Dr Rocky Point Rd 1.02 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 1.02 mi 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 3 Martin St Ramona Expy Ramona Expy .71 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Width varies from 17' to 34'. 5 Mary Ellen Dr La Canada Dr .27 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Paramount Dr 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 runa Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 77 77 17 17 21 21 8 8 203 203 44 44 47 47 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 j 08/09 D E R C 2 1 0 74 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 14 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 18 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 200 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 43 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 44 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 36 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist' Meridian St SH 74 .96 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Little Lake St 41 (ft)/ 41 (ft) 3 Might Cir Bold Ruler Ln .05 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'Ly 0.05 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 2 Miners Rd Piedras Rd .31 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Copper Queen Ln 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Mira Loma Area various roads 8.00 (mi) Resurf AC paved road (ft)/ (ft) 2 Mirileste Dr Menifee Rd .29 (mi) Resurf AC paved road SW'ly 0.29 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 5 Mission Tr/ Corydon St Lemon St S'ly Mission Tr .08 mi .12 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Const storm drain CDBG funds are federal funds. 1 Mitchell Rd Regal Btue Tr .82 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply Nill St 0.17 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 3 rued Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 418 418 12 12 56 56 400 400 105 105 301 233 534 51 51 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 415 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 100 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 104 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 301 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 178 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 37 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Mockingbird Cyn Rd El Sobrante Rd 2.09 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Section Line 34:27 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 1 Mockingbird Cyn Rd Section Line 34:27 1.30 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Van Buren Blvd 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 Moneaque Rd 4 Orcabessa Dr Nly Orcabessa Dr .06mi .06 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road Monroe St 4 S'ly 58th Ave 0.56 mi Sly Airport Blvd .39mi 1.18 (mi) 13 (ft)/ 13 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Monroe St 53rd Ave .49 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 52nd Ave 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 4 Monroe St 4 54th St Nly Airport Blvd .42mi .57 (mi) 13 (ft)/ 13 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Monterey Ave Varner Rd .60 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ramon Rd 50 (ft)/ 50 (ft) 4 runs Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x 31000 190 190 137 137 26 26 121 121 35 35 22 22 7 487 494 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 31000 0 = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 107/08 ( 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 187 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 24 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 21 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 5 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 2 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 38 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Monty Ct Grand Ave .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.08 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 1 300 17 Muriel Dr La Canada Dr .16 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Paramount Dr 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) other Total 17 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 16 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2 300 46 Nancy Dr Dillon Rd .33 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly to end 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) other Total 46 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 43 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 301 66 other Total 66 Neighbours Blvd 34th Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 32nd Ave 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 4 302 89 other Total 89 New Chicago Ave 3 300 205 Alto Dr Acacia Ave .13 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon surface and widen road other Noble St Brookside Ave 1.01 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Orchard St 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Total 205 5 300 146 North Orange St C.L. Riverside N'ly 0.08 mi .08 (mi) 14 (ft)/ 14 (ft) Resurf E 1/2 RMS paved road Coordinate w/ City of Riverside for W 1/2. other Total 146 5 300 15 other Total 15 D 2 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 R 13 0 0 0 C 50 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 88 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 21 2 0 182 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 145 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 12 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • Page 39 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist North Orange St Chase Rd S'ly 0.04 mi .04 (mi) 14 (ft)/ 14 (ft) Resurf E 1/2 RMS paved road Coordinate w/ City of Riverside for W 1/2. 5 Norwood Dr Acorn Ln .09 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly & S'ly 0.09 mi 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 3 Nuevo Rd Menifee Rd .75 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Rosary Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Oak Valley Dr Leon Rd .20 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Old Elsinore Rd S'ly Rider 0.85 mi 2.32 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 10% if project is in SD#1. Juniper Flats Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) San Jacinto Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 5 5 011a Rd Pachea Tr .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ply 0.08 mi 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 Orange St Waite St .25 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Lemon St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 11 11 300 other Total 300 other 25 25 201 Total 300 other Total 300 other Total. 300 other Total 300 other Total 201 28 28 133 538 671 33 33 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 1 08/09 D E R c 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 24 0 0 0 0 D E R c 2 1 0 198 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R c 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 25 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 10 0 5 0 0 E 0 0 2 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 116 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 30 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 48 48 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 45 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Orange View Cir Orchard View Ln N'ly 0.06 mi .06 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 1 Orcabessa Dr Brownstown Dr Front Hall Rd .24 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 Orchard St Walnut St .18 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly 0.18 mi 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 1 Orchard View In La Sierra Ave Praed St .69 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 1 Oreana Way Calle De Las Flores .20 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Overture Dr Palm Oasis Ave .57 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road SH 111 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 5 Pablo St Via Santana .04 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.04 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 5 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 13 13 106 106 37 37 127 127 65 65 183 183 20 20 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D E R C 2 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 8 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 98 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley mximvl 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 1 0 124 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 62 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 182 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 41 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Pachea Tr 3 300 Girard St S'ly 0.81 mi .81 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total Pacific Ave 4 301 Forest Dr Riverlane Dr .07 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road other Total Pageant PI 3 300 Pachea Tr Ply 0.08 mi .08 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total Palm Ave 3 300 Lincoln Ave Fairview Ave .50 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total Palm Oasis Ave 5 301 Overture Dr E"ly Parkmead 0.04 mi .53 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total Palm Oasis Ave 5 301 Clearwater Wy Overture Dr .38 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total Palo Verde Area 4 302 various roads .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 260 260 27 27 33 33 33 33 165 165 115 115 260 800 1060 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 257 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 25 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 30 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 30 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 162 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 112 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 210 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 42 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Par Dr Thornhill Dr .19 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Olympia Wy 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 3 Parado Del Sol Dr Delgado Wy .87 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Villa Balboa Dr 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 3 Parado Del Sol Dr Villa Balboa Dr .87 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Chaparral Dr 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 3 Paramount Dr Rodeo Dr .20 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.20 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Parkside Dr SH 111 1.74 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Desertaire Dr 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 Paseo Grande Via Del Rio Hummingbird Ln .44 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Recon segments from Pine Crest Dr to N'ly of Via Santiago 2 Pasito St Mirileste Dr .08 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly 0.08 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 5 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 71 71 471 471 238 238 67 67 120 120 464 100 564 36 36 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 1 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 70 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 468 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 1 0 235 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 64 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 119 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 464 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 184 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 43 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Patrick Ct Grand Ave .05 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.05 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 1 Pats Point Dr Lawson Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.14 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 Patty St Riverview Dr .11 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Jennie St 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total. 300 other Total Pauba Rd SH79 Los Caballos 1.26 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon RMS paved road 3 Pedley Area various roads 7.00 (mi) Resurf AC paved roads (ft)/ (ft) 2 Penasco Cir Porter St .28 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.28 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 5 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Petersfield Rd Orcabessa Nly 0rcabessa Dr .06mi .06 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 12 12 55 55 33 33 319 319 400 400 101 101 25 25 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 ( 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 52 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 30 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 316 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 100 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 2 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 23 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 44 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Pick Pl Van Buren Blvd .45 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Sally In 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Piedras Rd El Mineral Rd .85 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Santa Rosa Mine Rd 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 Pine Cove Rd SH 243 .44 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road W'ly 0.44 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Pine Crest Ave 3 SH 243 Riverside Cnty Playgrn .30 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Pinto St 45th St Ave Michaelinda .08 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 2 Pinto St Ave Valencia .07 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Sty 0.07 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 2 Placer Hills Ct El Mineral Rd .07 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.07 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 58 58 167 167 97 97 76 76 35 35 25 25 17 17 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 58 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 164 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 73 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 32 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 23 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 • • • 186 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 45 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Poinsetta Pl 51st St .09 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Jurupa Rd 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total Poplar Ln Ridgeview Terr .05 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Nly End 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Porter Ave Calle Del Corral .11 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Sunset View Dr 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Porter St San Jacinto Ave Central Ave .70 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Width varies from 20' to 27'. 5 300 other Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 24 24 31 31 29 Total 300 other Total Praed St Dufferin Ave .52 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Brightridge Ln 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 Prairie Wy Colt St .37 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Gentian Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 Prestwick Rd Waverly Dr .31 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Annandale Rd 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 300 other Total 300 other Total 29 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 1 08/09 D E R C 2 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 0 0 0 0 155 155 113 113 46 46 300 other Total 95 95 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 152 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 110 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 45 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 94 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 46 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Princo St Alvarado St .07 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.07 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Puerto Vallarta Wy 3 San Quintin Ave Sly San Quintin 0.05mi .05 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Purple Sage Dr Palm Oasis Ave .12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Overture Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Pyrite St Jurupa Rd Mission Blvd .61 (mi) 50 (ft)/ 50 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Width varies from 29' to 50'. 2 Quarter Horse Rd Mockingbird Cyn Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road SW'ly 0.14 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Ramon Rd San Miguelito Dr 3.40 (mi) Recon AC paved road 1000 Palms Cyn Rd 24 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 4 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 16 16 21 21 42 42 453 453 28 28 13 1510 1523 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 107/08 108/09 n = m C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 20 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 39 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 450 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 25 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ramon Rd Varner Rd I-10 EB ramps .31 (mi) 42 (ft)/ 42 (ft) Recon portions of pavement with concrete 4 301 other Total 697 536 1233 D E R C 11 10 0 676 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 47 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Rancho California Rd De Luz Rd Temecula C.L. 3.39 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Recon AC paved road and install raised centerline markers. 1 Range View Dr 5 NW'ly Overture 0.07 mi SE'ly Overture 0.04 mi .11 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Fund Source Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 129 1700 Rannells Blvd 28th Ave .60 (mi) Recon RMS paved road 26th Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 Rannells Blvd 26th Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 24th Ave 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) 4 Rebecca St Jennie St .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road NW'ly 0.15 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Reche Canyon Rd Woodson Rd Whittier St .25 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Drainage improvements at various locations 5 Rica Dr Los Ranchos Cir .20 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road N'ly 0.20 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 302 other Total 302 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other 1829 34 34 42 42 69 69 45 Total 45 144 144 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right o Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = onstruction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 125 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 31 D E R C 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 42 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 20 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 123 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 1 0 14 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 48 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Rider St Clark St .53 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Brown St 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total Ridge Crest Village View Dr .04 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.04 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 300 other Total River Rd Bridge Santa Ana River .12 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Bridge Replacement RCTD is working to secure the local matching funds needed for R/W and construction. 2 Riverlane Dr Clinton St .22 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Sitverwood Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 4 Robyn Ct Grand Ave .03 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.03 mi 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 1 Rodeo Dr Muriel Dr .33 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.33 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 Rosa Ave Calhoun St .44 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Rue Marande 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 4 300 other Total 301 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 38 38 11 11 422 20156 20578 94 Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 94 10 10 126 126 69 69 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 35 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 8 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 32 95 0 0 0 E 295 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 87 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 123 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 190 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 49 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Supv.Dist EW (ft)/PW (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 Description x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition (Comments) E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 Rose Quartz Dr 1 300 29 D 0 0 0 0 0 El Nido Rd SW'ly 0.15 mi E 0 0 0 1 0 .15 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 0 28 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 29 Round Table Cir 2 300 12 D 0 0 0 0 0 Bold Ruler Ln Ply 0.05 mi E 0 0 1 0 0 .05 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 11 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 12 Rue Chateau 4 301 15 D 2 0 0 0 0 Rue Marne Rue Montigny E 1 0 0 0 0 .12 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 12 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 15 Rue Marande 4 301 18 D 2 0 0 0 0 Rue Paray N'ly 0.14 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .14 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 15 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 18 Rue Marlene 4 301 9 D 2 0 0 0 0 Rue Chateau N'ly 0.03 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .03 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 6 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 9 Rue Marne 4 301 36 D 2 0 0 0 0 Rue Paray Ella Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .10 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 33 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 36 Rue Montigny 4 301 11 D 2 0 0 0 0 Rue Chateau Ella Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .07 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 8 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Rue Paray Jackson St .22 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Rue Marande 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Ruthann Dr La Canada Dr .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Rodeo Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) SR 60 Interchanges 6 locations .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Maintenance of landscaping SR60 at: Van Buren, Etiwanda, Mission/Country Village, Pedley, Pyrite and Rubidoux. Sagewood Dr Stoneridge Dr .10 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ply & Wily 0.10 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Saint Andrews Dr Thornhill Dr .20 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Olympia Wy 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Saint Annes Bay Dr Orcabessa Dr Ewarton Rd .16 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road Sally Ann Cir Filly Ln .03 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.03 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Fund Source Total 4 301 other Total 2 300 other Total 2 300 other Total 1 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 4 301 other Total 2 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 68 68 60 60 2000 2000 23 23 69 69 62 62 8 8 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 65 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 57 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 500 500 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 500 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 20 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 5 0 0 57 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 7 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 IDRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 51 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Sally Ln Van Buren Blvd .34 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Pick Pl 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 1 Samantha Pl La Rue St .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Jennie St 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) 2 San Quintin Ave 3 Murrieta Rd Ely Murrieta Rd 0.32mi .32 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road San Sevaine Channel/Van Buren Blvd 2 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Road improvements associated with construction of the Flood Control Project of San Sevaine Channel Stage 7. San Sevaine Way Mission Blvd 1.15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Etiwanda Ave 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) 2 San Timoteo Canyon Rd Redlands Blvd 5.30 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Beaumont C.L. 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 5 San Timoteo Cyn Rd Live Oak Cyn Rd .23 (mi) Recon AC paved road S.B. County Line 24 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 5 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 48 48 53 53 115 115 3 3 141 560 701 687 687 41 150 191 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental. C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 i 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 50 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 45 2 0 2 0 0 0 92 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 684 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 3 0 0 0 E 0 2 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 36 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 52 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Santa Rosalia Dr 3 Newport Rd S'ly Newport Rd 0.09mi .09 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Fund Source Total 300 other Total Saunders Meadow Rd 3 SH 243 (South) Club House Dr (North) 1.78 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Scheelite St 61st St .24 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 59th St 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 2 Scottsdale Dr Sussex Rd .05 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly 0.05 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Sea Breeze Dr Via Mirage .56 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Desertaire Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Seven Springs Wy Washington St .48 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly 0.48 mi 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 1 Shetland In Thorobred Ln .13 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Bold Ruler Ln 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 37 37 172 172 85 85 14 14 107 107 88 88 20 20 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = EnviornmentaL C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 1 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 36 0 0 300 Measure A/Western IG W K U 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 106 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 194 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • Page 53 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Sierra Dr Overture Dr .09 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly Overture 0.09 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Fund Source Total 301 other Total Silverwood Dr Fred Waring Dr Riverlane Dr .09 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 Simpson Rd Briggs Rd 3.00 (mi) Recon AC paved road Rte 79 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 Singingbird Ln Stallion Crest Rd .19 (mi) Resurf AC paved road E'ly 0.19 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Sky View Ave Palm Oasis Ave .07 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Overture Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Skylane Dr 34th St .27 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 36th St 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 2 Skylinks Dr Estrada Dr Golden West Ave .07 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 2 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 32 32 37 37 21 99 120 36 36 25 25 56 56 28 28 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornnental C = Construction 04/05 j 05/06 106/07 107/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 29 D 0 0 0 0 3 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 34 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 22 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 53 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 26 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 54 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Snow View Dr S'ly Palm Oasis .04 mi N'ly Palm Oasis 0.03mi .07 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Note: Portions of this road is not in the county maintained system. 5 Sol Vista Dr 3 San Quintin Ave Sly San Quintin 0.02mi .02 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf AC paved road South Broadway 15th Ave Blythe CL .40 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Resurface 0.1', 38' A/C W/ petromat 4 South Broadway Seeley Ave .50 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 15th Ave 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 4 South Main Divide Rd SH 74 4.61 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Hacienda Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 1 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 302 other Total 302 other Total 300 other Total Stagecoach Rd Juniper Flats Rd 1.69 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 1.69 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 5 Stallion Crest Rd Harley John Rd .29 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Seven Springs Wy 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 53 53 11 11 85 85 45 45 293 293 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 108/09 D 0 0 0 0 2 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 50 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 10 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 75 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 290 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 110 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 107 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 196 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 55 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Stanton St Hastings Blvd .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.15 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 Fund Source Total 300 other Total State St Ontario Ave Shadow Valley Dr .67 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Verify whether City of Corona wishes to participate on their small segment. 2 Sterling Ave 5 'Ply Palm Oasis 0.02mi S'ly Palm Oasis 0.20mi .22 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Stetson Ave Dartmouth St Stanford St .25 (mi) 42 (ft)/ 56 (ft) Widen & recon existing pvmnt. Add left turn lane Fronting Hemet High School Modify Stanford/Stetson signal 3 Stobbs Wy Opal St .33 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Mission Blvd 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 Stoneridge Dr Stoney Creek Dr .28 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Canyon View Dr 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 1 Stoneridge Dr Sagewood Ct r .29 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Stoney Creek Dr 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 61 61 91 91 68 68 497 497 102 102 30 30 56 56 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 107/08 108/09 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 58 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 88 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 65 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 497 0 2 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 99 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 30 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 53 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 56 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Stoney Creek Dr Canyon View Dr .20 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Stoneridge Dr 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Sugar Ln Ridgeview Terrace .04 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly 0.04 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 Sun City Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf AC paved roads (ft)/ (ft) 3 Sun City Blvd McCall Blvd .50 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Chambers Ave 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) 3 Sun City Median Improvements Segment 4 & 5 Sun City Blvd .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Place Stamped Concrete on Sun City Blvd 3 Sun City Median Improvements Segments 6, 7 & 8 Cherry Hills Blvd .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Place Stamped Concrete on Cherry Hills Blvd 3 Sun Swept St Alvarado Ave .02 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.02 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 4 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 39 39 29 29 1300 1050 2350 232 232 190 190 244 244 12 12 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 ( 06/07 07/08 { 08/09 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 36 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 29 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 900 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 22 0 209 0 0 0 0 D E R C 16 1 0 173 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 20 0 223 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 198 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 57 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Sunnyslope Ln Palm Oasis Ave .08 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Holly Dr 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 5 Sussex Rd Fox Glen Rd .59 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Fox Glen Rd (loop) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Swingle Ave Miles Ave .20 (mi) Resurface Paved Road N'ly Miles Ave 0.2 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 4 Sylvan Wy Pine Cove Rd .62 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road W'ly 0.62 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Tanglewood Dr Ridgemoor Rd .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Sun City Blvd 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 Tava Ln Suttles Dr .24 (mi) Resurf AC paved road King Ave 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 1 Taylor Dr Vineland St .25 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Orchard St 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 5 Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 301 other 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 08/09 28 Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 28 106 106 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 25 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 103 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 36 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 33 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 140 45 45 36 36 29 29 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 139 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 36 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 26 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 58 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Thorobred Ln Pedtey Rd Wily 0.26 mi .26 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Width varies from 29' to 34'. 2 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd Ramon Rd/Washington St Dillon Rd 5.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen and Resurf RMS paved road 4 Toft Dr Grand Ave .38 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.38 mi 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Tracy Cir Forest Dr N'ly 0.02 mi .02 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 4 Trisha Way Krameria Ave .13 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily 0.13 mi 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 1 Tyler St 48th Ave N'ly 0.25 mi .25 (mi) 11 (ft)/ 11 (ft) Recon AC paved road Costs reflect only Co. side 4 Union St Bain St .56 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Bellegrave Ave 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 2 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 65 65 767 767 71 71 9 9 17 17 45 45 300 other Total 58 58 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 ( 08/09 I. W 2' U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 2 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 764 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 68 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 D E R C 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 1 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 200 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 59 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Valley Wy/ Armstrong Rd SR 60 Sierra Ave .90 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 76 (ft) Reconst and widen to 4 lanes RCTD is working to secure the funds needed for R/W and construction. 2 Van Buren Blvd West of Regency Ranch .50 (mi) Const concrete V ditch Wily 0.5 mi (ft)/ (ft) 1 Van Buren Blvd Washington St Orange Terrace Pkwy 3.50 (mi) 76 (ft)/ 76 (ft) Const raised median, signals & Bus turn -outs from Mockingbird Cyn Rd to Wood St. Signals at Smith Bros and at Woodcrest Plaza. Modify 1 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Van Dell Rd 20th St .22 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 25th St 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 2 Varner Rd Ramon Rd .70 (mi) Recon AC paved road Ply Harry Oliver Tr 44 (ft)/ 44 (ft) 4 Verano Dr Parado Del Sol Dr .29 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.29 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Via Calorin Via Curve .04 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wly 0.04 mi 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 2 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 45 5356 5401 105 105 115 223 56 56 11 670 681 79 79 14 14 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmentat C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 07/08 1 08/09 D E R C 15 6 19 3 0 0 0 2 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 5 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 100 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R c 10 1 0 212 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 53 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 8 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 76 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 60 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Via Curva Estrada Dr .22 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Asa Wy 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 Via De Los Arboles Chaparral Dr .33 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply 0.33 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Via De Oro De Portola Rd .53 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Chaparral Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Via Eldorado Chaparral Dr .09 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Ply 0.09 mi 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 Via Florencia Golden West Ave .19 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wly 0.19 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 2 Via Josefa Via Santiago Frontage Rd .05 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Recon AC paved road Coordinate with City of Corona for a portion of the street. Only county costs are shown. 2 Via Mirage Parkside Dr .12 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly 0.12 mi 19 (ft)/ 19 (ft) 4 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 96 96 88 88 103 103 25 25 81 81 26 26 20 20 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 7 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 89 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 85 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 1 0 100 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 22 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 75 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 202 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 61 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Via Ocotillo Parkside Dr .32 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Sea Breeze Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 Via Santana Mirileste Dr .35 (mi) Resurf AC paved road N'ly & S'ly 0.35 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 5 Via Verbena Parkside Dr .16 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Sea Breeze Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 Victorian Ln Grape St .26 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Woodcreek Ln 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Villa Balboa Dr Parado Del Sol Dr .16 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Wily 0.16 mi 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 3 Villa Vista Ave Estrada Dr Golden West Ave .11 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 2 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 61 61 132 132 301 other Total 32 32 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 other Total 300 other 50 50 35 Total 300 other Total Village View Dr Forest Hill Dr .19 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly & Wily 0.19 mi 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 3 300 other Total 35 43 43 26 26 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 47 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 32 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 3 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 40 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 23 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 62 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Villela Ct Ave De Palma .04 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ty End 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) 2 Vineland St Edgar Canyon Channel .01 (mi) Construct box culvert 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 5 Vista De Oro Riverview Dr .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road De La Vista 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) 2 Vista De Oro Pacific Ave .16 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road E'ly 0.16 mi 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 Wade St Rue Paray .08 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ty 0.08 mi 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 4 Wagon Rim Ct Almond St .12 (mi) Resurf AC paved road W'ly 0.12 mi 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Wallace St 34th St .91 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Hall Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 2 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 15 15 403 403 38 38 52 52 31 31 26 26 218 218 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 106/07 ( 07/08 08/09 D 0 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 14 300 Measure A/Western D 0 52 0 0 0 E 0 20 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 331 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 2 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 23 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 215 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 204 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • • Page 63 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Washington St 1000 Palms Cyn Rd 1.60 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Pushawalla Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 4 Washington St Harley John Rd .53 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Markham St 64 (ft)/ 64 (ft) 1 Watkins Dr I-215 .17 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Riverside C.L. 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 5 Waverly Dr Ridgemoor Rd .16 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly 0.16 mi 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 3 Wellman Rd Terwilliger Rd 1.00 (mi) Recon RMS paved road Kirby Rd 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) 3 Western View Dr Leon Rd .18 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Juniper Flats Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 5 Whittier Ave San Jacinto St Soboba St 2.27 (mi) 45 (ft)/ 45 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Width varies from 20' to 48'. 1/4 mile segment resurfaced in 01/02. 3 Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total - 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 250 604 854 155 155 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmentat C = Construction 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 1 08/09 D E R C 0 0 0 0 110 5 0 2 0 0 0 133 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 152 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 60 60 297 297 22 22 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 54 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 294 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 19 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1096 1096 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1093 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 64 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Willow Tree Ln Windtree Ave .14 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Woodcreek Ln 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Willowbrook Rd W'ly SH 74 .21 (mi) Recon RMS paved road E'ly SH 74 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 3 Windtree Ave Grape St .54 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Woodcreek Ln 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 1 Woodbridge Ln Rutile St W'ly end .25 (mi) 13 (ft)/ 13 (ft) Resurf 1/2 street in coordination w/ development TR 28808-1 Young Homes. 2 Woodcreek Ln Windtree Ave .34 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Windtree Ave 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) 1 Woodcrest Dr Canyon View Dr .16 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Stoneridge Dr 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 1 Wren Dr Delta Dr .14 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road 12th St 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) 5 Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 30 30 31 31 97 97 46 46 64 64 32 32 33 Total 33 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 07/08 108/09 1c, W C U 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 28 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 94 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 61 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 29 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R c 2 0 30 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 206 •RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 65 10/20/2004 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Wrightwood Dr Acorn Ln .14 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road S'ly & Wily 0.14 mi 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Zane Wy Kimdale Dr .15 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Kalsman Dr 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) z* Future Projects District 1 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds wilt be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. z* Future Projects District 3 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. z* Future Projects District 4 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. z* Future Projects District 5 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. Fund Source Total 3 300 other Total 5 300 other Total 1 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 4 301 other Total 5 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 41 41 23 23 1510 806 2316 1700 1805 3505 350 4220 4570 2625 2221 4846 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 1 07/08 08/09 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 40 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 600 300 Measure A/Western 170 0 0 500 70 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 400 100 0 0 800 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 400 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 350 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 500 400 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 750 0 0 0 975 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2005-2009 Page 66 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 10/20/2004 Fund Source Source Nme Fiscal Year (Amt x $1000) Fund Source Total Expenditure 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 (Amt x $1000) 300 Measure A/Western 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 302 Measure A/Palo Verde * Grand Totals * 15237 10668 9551 9145 10119 54720 3573 2249 2383 1428 1691 11324 494 364 232 254 1344 19304 12917 12298 10805 12064 67388 • • • 208 AGENDA ITEM 6R • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement No. 05-33-526, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 04-33-009, with Epic Land Solutions, Inc. to Provide Additional Right -of -Way Services for the Perris Multi -Modal Station STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 05-33-526, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 04-33-009, with Epic Land Solutions, Inc. to provide additional Right -of -Way Services for the Perris Multi -Modal Station Project in Perris, for a not to exceed contract amount of $30,175; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its October 8, 2003 meeting, the Commission approved Agreement No. 04-33-009 with Epic Land Solutions for Phase 1 right of way services for the Perris Valley Line Project in the amount of $312,774. In February 2004, staff executed Additional Work Authorization No. 1, pursuant to the agreement, in the amount of $31,162 for right-of-way services to support preliminary engineering of the Perris Multimodal Station. This additional work authorization provided for assistance with community outreach activities, assessment of lease assignment issues, and identification of unauthorized encroachments on the right-of-way. Authorization of the additional work increased the contract value to $343,936 ($312,774 + $31,162). In September, the City of Perris approved a master concept plan for the Perris Multimodal Station. The master plan outlines development of the station in phases. The first phase is anticipated to be completed in 2006 with a bus transfer facility for the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). The environmental document for Phase 1 is currently underway. At this time, staff needs to resolve title issues related to the 1993 acquisition of the parcels for the station, complete a FTA level appraisal Agenda Item 6R 209 of the parcels for the bus transfer facility, perform a license and easement review, and address access easements for adjacent businesses along 'D' Street in Perris. The proposed amendment with Epic Land Solutions for the Perris Multi -Modal Station Project will include all necessary labor to complete this work for an amount not to exceed $30,175. Approval of this amendment will increase the total contract value to $374,111. Phase 1 of the Perris Multimodal Station Project is funded in part by Riverside Transit Agency through a federal bus earmark. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2004-05 Amount: $30,125.00 Source of Funds: RTA/FTA $24,100 STA - $6,025 Budget Ad ustment: N GLA No.: 222-33-65520 P 3800 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Ue,i,i,ie.44.e,u Date: 11/17/2004 Attachment: Request from Epic Land Solutions w/ Fee Estimate Dated 11/17/2004 • • • Agenda Item 6R 210 • • • Epic Land Solutions, Inc. 24050 Madison Street, Suite 205 Torrance, CA 90505 Voice: 310-378-1178 Fax: 310-378-0558 November 17, 2004 Stephanie Wiggins Rail Department Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502 RE: Agreement No. 04-33-009; Right of Way Services for the Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Project, Additional Work Authorization No. 1 Dear Stephanie: As per our discussion, Epic Land Solutions, Inc. has completed the scope of work for the Perris Multi -Modal Facility outlined in the above referenced agreement for which the estimated cost of services was $31,162. Included in the scope of services was: • Community Outreach Activities • FRAMCO Property Vacation (Lease Assignment Issue Only) • Unauthorized Encroachment Identification We are hereby requesting a contract amendment to for the next phase of services to include: • Resolution of Title Issues • Perris Station Phase 1 Appraisal • Perris Station Access Easements for Adjacent Businesses • Licenses and Easement Review • On -call Support Services Our estimate for these services is contained in the attached worksheet and totals $30,175.21. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions about this request. Best Regards, Holly Rockwell President www.epicland.com RIGHT OF WAY SOLUTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD 211 • • FEE SCHEDULE • PERRIS VALLEY MULTI -MODAL Area Company Name Level Hours Rate Fee Estimate Expenses Expense Amount SubTotal 5% Mark-up Total GRAND TOTAL J4. Resolution of Title Issues Epic H. Rockwell Relationship Mgr 5 $ 149 .88 $ 749 .40 $749.40 $749.40 Epic M. Kaiser Encroach Mgr 24 $ 119.90 $ 2,877.60 Mileage $37.50 $2,915.10 $2,915.10 $3,664 .50 J6. Appraisal Epic H. Rockwell Relationship Mgr 5 $ 149 .88 $ 749.40 $749.40 $749.40 JWA J. Wiley ROW Mgr 5 $ 175.00 $ 875.00 $875 .00 $43 .75 $918 .75 JWA M. Murray Acquisition Mgr 40 $ 100 .00 $ 4,000.00 Mileage $56.25 $4,056 .25 $202 .81 $4,259 .06 Appraiser $ 6,000 .00 $6,000.00 $300 .00 $6,300.00 $12,227 .21 J7. Access Easemen ts Epic H. Rockwell Relationship Mgr 5 $ 149.88 $ 749 .40 Mileage $75.00 $824 .40 $824.40 Epic M. Kaiser Encroach Mgr 16 $ 119.90 $ 1,918 .40 Mileage $37 .50 $1,955.90 $1,955 .90 $2,780.30 J8. Tenant Review Epic H. Rockwell Relationship Mgr 10 $ 149. 88 $ 1,498.80 Mileage $75.00 $1,573 .80 $1,573 .80 Epic M. Kaiser Encroach Mgr 55 $ 119.90 $ 6,594.50 Mileage $150.00 $6,744.50 $6,744.50 $8,318.30 J9. On -call Epic H. Rockwell Relationship Mgr 5 $ 149. 88 $ 749.40 $749.40 $749.40 Epic M. Kaiser Encroach Mgr 20 $ 119.90 $ 2,398.00 Mileage $37.50 $2,435.50 $2,435.50 $3,184 .90 190 $ 29,159. 90 $ 468 .75 $ 29,628 .65 $ 546 .56 $ 30,175.21 $ 30,175.21 212 AGENDA ITEM 6S • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Sheldon Peterson, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Commuter Rail Program Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Riverside Line Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of October averaged 4,575 which is down 254 (-5%) from the month of September. The line has averaged an overall increase of 5% from a year ago October 2003. October on -time performance averaged 85% inbound (-1 % from September) and 82% outbound (-7% from September). There were 40 delays greater than 5 minutes during the month of September, an 8 point increase from the month of September. Union Pacific dispatching continues to be the primary cause of delays; Metrolink staff is working directly with the railroad to try to improve performance. The following were the primary causes: Agenda Item 6S 213 Inland Empire -Orange County Line Passenger trips on Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line for the month of October averaged 3,647, a change of 92 more riders or an increase of 3% from the month of September. The line has averaged a decrease of 3% from a year ago October 2003. This slight decrease could be attributed to the poor on - time performance, with peak period performance for the line averaging 91%. October on -time performance averaged 90% inbound (-1 % from September) and 93% outbound (+6% from September). There were 22 delays greater than five minutes during the month of September, a 5 point decrease from the month of September. The primary causes were: 91 Line *Vandalism & Other Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of October averaged 1,893, down 81 riders or a decrease of 4%, from the month of September. The line has averaged an increase of 14% from a year ago October 2003. October on -time performance averaged 90% inbound (-3% from September) and 94% outbound (+5% from September). There were 14 delays greater than five minutes during the month of September, down 4 from September. The primary causes were: ause *Freight Train, Amtrak Train, & Other • • • Agenda Item 6S 214 • • • Metrolink Operating Contractor Changes On November 12th, 2004, the SCRRA Board approved staff's recommendation to award the Operating Contract for engineers and conductors to Connex Railroad LLC. Connex was the highest ranked proposer for both technical and cost criteria. The new contractor will begin July 1, 2005 and is a five year contract with one five year option. Metrolink's current operating contractor, Amtrak, was ruled non- responsive to the request for proposal due to written exceptions taken on liability issues. Metrolink staff expects a smooth transition and hopes that a majority of the current crews will accept positions with the new operator. Metrolink Holiday Train Passenger Service Metrolink operated the Thanksgiving Day train service for the 2"d year on selected routes. This year there were two routes operating from Riverside. The first provided six roundtrip trains to Orange County and second had one roundtrip to Los Angeles via San Bernardino. The New Years Day service will run from Riverside on the San Bernardino Line into Los Angeles with connections to Pasadena via the Gold Line. Metrolink Holiday Toy Express The Metrolink Holiday Toy Express Train made its rounds through Riverside County on Sunday, November 21st the train was at Riverside - Downtown from 5:15 p.m., La Sierra at 6:05 p.m., and North Main Corona at 6:55 p.m. The train visited the Pedley Station at 5:20 p.m. on Saturday, November 27th. There was a 30 minute presentation and show with Santa and his elves during the event. The annual Spark of Love toy drive was held in conjunction with the train stops with a great turn out. This year we encouraged additional attendance by having larger events with music, entertainment, or other activities. We held a school toy drive contest during the event with local elementary schools in the Riverside, Alvord, Corona Norco, and Jurupa unified school districts. All classes with over 10 donations were entered into a drawing to win a school trip on Metrolink's weekday service. The winning schools will be notified shortly. Attachment: Metrolink Performance Summaries - October 2004 Agenda Item 6S 215 • • METROLINK PERFORMANCE SUMMARIES October 2004 .(e. M ETROLINK • 40,000 38,000 — 35,803 36,000 — 34,000 32,000 30,000 28,000 26,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 Oct -03 Nov -03 Dec -03 METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY P ASSENGER TRIPS Jan -04 Feb -04 Mar -04 Apr -04 May -04 ECM Iday Adj—40—Unadj Avg 37,751 k\zs.\\\\:\:\ Jun -04 Jut -04 Aug -04 Sep -04 Oct -04 217 100. 0% PERCENT PASSENGERS ON -TI ME vs TRAINS ON -TIME * 95.0% — 90. 0% 85.0% — 80.0% O ct 03 Nov Dec * Within 5 -Minute s Of Sche dule Includes Wee ke nd Service Ja n Feb M ar Apr May 0 Passenger OTP% D Train OTP% I Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 04 • 1 8 • • • • METROLINK ON -TIME PERFOR MANCE Weekday Trains (Latest 13 Months) Oct 03 Nov 03 Dec 03 Jan 04 Feb 04 Mar 04 Apr 04 May 04 Jun 04 Jul 04 Aug 04 Sep 04 Oct 04 % Arriving Within 5 -Minutes Of Sche duled Time I 219 4 • % of Train Delays By Resp onsibility October 2004 TRK-Contractor 2% SIG -Contractor 8% SCRRA 12% Inc ludes Wee ke nd Service UPRR 14% Passenger 4% Vandalism 3% Other 17% Mechanical 20 % Law-Enf 0% BNSF 14 % Improv (SCRRA) OP Agree 4% 2% TRK-Contractor 1% SIG -Con tractor 7% SCRRA 12% Passenger 5% O ther aw-Enf 14% In cludes We ekend Service % of Train Delays By Responsibility 12 Month Peri od Ending October 2004 UPRR 11% Vandalism 4% Mechanical 11 % 0% OP Agree Improv (SCRRA) 2% 5% BNSF 28% 020 • 5 • • PERFORMANCE CHARTS - B ACK-UP • 1 eIMETROLINK 221 Oct 03 • METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED • Vert Cou ura . my Antelope Valley Nov 03 Dec 03 Jan 04 Feb 04 Mar 04 A pr 04 Ma 04 Jun 04 Jul 04 Au_ 04 Sep 04 Oct 04 4,295 4,568 3,516 4,001 4,095 4,153 4,107 3,970 3,868 3,829 3,822 3,954 5,583 5,466 5,230 5,665 5,990 5,885 6,262 6,180 6,258 6,384 6,327 6,370 4,143 6,540 San [Bernardino:; 9,965 10,007 9,983 10,690 10,630 10,978 11,046 11,213 11,013 10,674 10,456 10,913 e Orange .popmyi 639 649 549 581 588 612 599 645 645 615 613 632 4,337 4,317 4,321 4,639 4,655 4,745 4,639 4,745 4,629 4,606 4,676 4,829 5,557 5,641 5,031 5,482 5,845 5,876 5,959 5,966 5,876 5,900 5,943 5,755 11,221 644 4,575 5,973 3,764 1,663 3,858 3,467 3,701 3,812 3,804 3,713 3,696 3,619 3,427 3,468 3,555 3,647 1,717 1,630 1,640 1,784 1,753 1,774 1,783 1,862 1,802 1,781 1,974 1,893 TOTAL. SYSTEM 35,803 36,223 33,727 36,399 37,399 37,806 38,099 38,198 37,770 37,237 37,086 37,982 38,636 ifs Prig) o -1% 1% -7% 8% 3% 1% 1% 0% -1 % -1% 0% 2% 2% Change Oct 04 vs Sep 04 5% 3% 3% 2% - -5% 4% 3% -4 % 2% % Change Oct 04 vs Oct 03 -4% 17% 13% 1% 5% 7% -3% 14 % 8% 222 Oct -03 AVERAGE D AILY METROLINK MONTHLY PASSHOLDERS ON AMTR AK THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW 1,038 265 256 111 60 39 1,149 325 295 16% 30% 120 4% Nov -03 (4) 1,054 228 157 130 50 60 1,183 278 217 3% -15 % -26% 119 Dec -03 (5) 947 156 179 104 23 29 1,051 179 209 -11% -36% -4% 110 Jan -04 (6) 1,060 189 135 110 27 20 1,170 216 155 11% 21 % -26% 107 Feb 04 1,117 360 201 119 55 28 1,236 415 229 6% 92% 48 % 99 Mar 04 1,113 242 228 128 51 44 1,241 293 272 0% -29% 19 % 94 Apr 04 1,132 186 225 133 48 48 1,265 234 273 2% -20% 0% 116 M ay 04 (7) 1,123 278 265 120 34 35 1,243 312 300 -2% 33% 10% 104 Jun 04 Jul 04 (8) 1,112 1,110 269 247 220 230 119 128 47 37 26 26 1,231 1,238 316 284 246 256 -1% 1% 1% -10% -18% 4% 90 118 A ug 04 Sep -04 (9) 1,110 1,106 244 210 275 199 128 135 86 21 34 25 1,238 1,241 330 231 309 224 0% 0% 16 % -30 % 21% -28% 99 93 Oct -04 (10) 1,222 255 237 137 43 19 1,359 298 256 10% 29 % 14% 85 !o change Oct 04 vs Sep 04 10% 21% 19% 1% 105% -24% 10% 29 % 14% Change Oct 04 vs Oct 03 18% -4% -7% 23% -28% -51% (1) Prior to Rail 2 Rail, Amtrak Step-Up/No Step -Up program was o nly go od on Amtrak weekday trains. (2) Rail 2 Rail program s ta rted Se ptembe r 1, 2002. (3) Missing data has been adjusted by using the lowest ride rship coun t for the respective train, day of week and month. (4) Average of first 3 weeks of month only as black -out in place for the Thanksgiving week (5) A verage excludin g 122 5 (6) Ave rage ex cluding January 1 (7) Average excluding May 31 (8) Average excluding July 5 (9) A verage excluding Labor Day (10) Ave rage excluding Columbus Day • 3 -9 % -29 % p ert summ-Rail /9/2004 • • 40,000 38,000 36,000 METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY P ASSENGER TRIPS - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED INCEPTION TO DATE 34,000 32,000 30,000 28,000 26,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 18,000 16,000 X, 14,000 - 12,000 -- 10,000 - 8,000 0 FY 04/05 X X "`:• IFY 03/04 .�.,. FY 02/03 .FY 01/02 *FY 00/01 FY 99/00 FY 98/99 FY 97/98 X_- -----�--x FY 96/97 FY 95/96 X xFY 94/95 224 a Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Oct -03 Nov No te: Sept Includes LA Cou nty Fa ir Riders Dec San Bernardino Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -04 Avg Daily Riders San Bernardino Line Sunday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips 3500 3000- 2500 2000 1500 1000 500- 0 Oct -03 Nov No te: Sunday Service Began 06/25/00` Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -04 • 1112 5 • 1l1 Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000- 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0-----. Oct -03 Nov • Antelope Valley Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -04 226 11 METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SUM MARY Percentage of Trains Arri ving Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time LATEST 13 MONTHS Root?:: Vetura County i.n `; Out Antelope'Val(ey :: In Out ;' Sari m-6*to . .. In :. Du€ Burbank Tur ns Ip Out : R,tverside tn . :< Oiut Orange County in C ttt ' 'It3�cIRd .mpIOC 7 Sc I�ia ' 14 .44:a,Total In ...: 00.1k::,In Systetx : Out Total Oct 03 95% 97% 96% 97 % 95% 94% 100 % 97 % 93% 96 % 93% 95% 89% 90 % 95% 90% 95 % 95% 95% Nov 03 100% 97% 96% 96% 94 % 92% 97% 98% 92 % 96% 93 % 89 % 85% 90% 95% 84 % 94 % 93% 94% Dec 03 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 99 % 100 % 98% 98 % 93 % 91% 90% 95% 96% 95 % 89% 97% 96% 96% Jan 04 99% 96% 97% 95% 96% 96 % 100 % 99 % 98 % 91% 90 % 97 % 91% 98% 90% 91 % 96% 96% 96 % Feb 04 99% 98% 97% 90% 96% 96 % 98% 100 % 93 % 95 % 91 % 95% 93% 86% 93% 91% 95 % 94% 95% Mar 04 100% 98% 97% 95% 97% 97% 99% 99 % 95% 89% 95% 96 % 88 % 86 % 97 % 95 % 96 % 95% 96 % Apr 04 98% 97% 96% 96% 96% 95% 100% 99% 89% 86% 96% 94 % 92 % 86 % 89 % 90% 95% 94 % 95 % May 04 99% 97% 98% 98% 99% 98% 100% 100 % 98% 95 % 96% 97% 95% 93 % 96% 98% 98 % 97% 97% Jun 04 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 93% 100% 100% 92 % 91% 95% 94% 97 % 94 % 97 % 99 % 96% 95% 96% Jul 04 100% 98% 96% 92% 90% 89% 100% 100% 96% 95% 94% 97 % 90% 86 % 94 % 91% 94% 93% 94% Aug 04 99% 99% 98% 93% 91% 90% 97% 99% 93% 92% 91% 91% 95% 89% 92% 94% 94 % 93% 94% Sep 04 99% 98% 98% 95% 94% 91% 98% 100% 86% 89% 89 % 91% 91% 87% 93 % 89 % 94% 93% 93% Oct04 99% 98% 95% 93% 94% 89% 98% 98% 85% 82% 91 % 94% 90% 93% 90 % 94% 93% 92% 93% Pe ak Period Trains Arriving Within 5 Minute s of Sche duled Time Oct 04 MEN Route A VL:Rotate SNB Route: BUR Turns - RJV :Route .: ::OC::Roifte tni EmptOC Route;: 9 -LA: :. Tot: tlbt Tot outbd et Syst' Peak Perio d Trains 99% 98% 97% 87% 92% 84% 100% 98% 86% 81% 91% 94 % 87% 95 % 98% 91% 93% 90% . 92% No adjustme nts ha ve been made for relievable delays. Terminated trains are considered OT if they were on -time at point of termination. Annulled trains are not included in the on -time calculatio n. • 1027 • 12 • • CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS October 2004 PRIM ARY CAUSE OF TRAIN DELAYS GREATER THAN 5 MINUTES CAUSE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC INL/OC 91 -LA TOTAL % of TOT Signals/Detectors 1 1 9 0 3 2 1 0 17 8% Slow Orders/MOW 1 2 6 0 3 2 1 1 16 7% Track/Switch 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 1% Dispatching 1 0 0 1 24 13 9 6 54 25 % Mechanical 0 11 14 4 5 4 4 2 44 20% Freight Train 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0% Amtrak Train 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 2% M etrolink Meet/Turn 0 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% Vandalism 0 1 5 0 0 1 1 0 8 4% Passenger(s) 0 6 3 0 0 1 0 0 10 5% SCRRA Hold Policy 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1% Other 1 0 23 0 5 6 6 2 43 20% TOTAL 7 30 69 5 40 31 22 14 218 100 % Saturday SNB 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 7 0 1 7 0 23 • Saturday AVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 Sunday SNB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 14228 0405CAUS FREQUENCY OF TR AIN DEL AYS BY DURATION October 2004 MINUTES LATE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC IE1OC RIVIFUL TOT AL % of TOT NO DELAY 389 365 572 221 171 304 189 168 2379 78.2% 1 MIN - 5 MIN 23 109 146 24 35 60 41 6 444 14.6 % 6MIN -10 MIN 5 15 26 3 13 14 7 5 88 2.9% 11 MIN -20 MIN 2 12 24 1 12 10 11 6 78 2.6 % 21 MIN - 30 MIN 0 2 7 1 8 3 1 0 22 0 .7% GREATER THAN 30 M IN 0 1 12 0 7 4 3 3 30 1 .0% ANNULLED 1 0 9 2 6 4 0 1 23 0.8 % TOTAL TRAINS OPTD 419 504 787 250 246 395 252 188 3041 100 % TRAINS DELAYED >0 min 30 139 215 29 75 91 63 20 662 21.8 % TRAINS DELAYED > 5 min 7 30 69 5 40 31 22 14 218 7 .2 % • 09 14 s 0405FREQ AGENDA ITEM 6T • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Sheldon Peterson, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2004 Beach Train Program Summary STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2004 Beach Train Program Summary as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Developed and administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) in 1996, the Beach Train is a popular program designed to maximize opportunities for public use of the commuter rail system in Riverside County. The seasonal trains, operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink), operate on various weekends between the months of June and October, and provide transportation from the inland communities in Riverside and San Bernardino counties to the beach communities of San Juan Capistrano, San Clemente, and Oceanside. 2004 Beach Train Season The 9th season of the Beach Trains carried 11,618 passengers over 20 days. This number was down slightly from last year. Total patronage over the last eight years exceeds 89,218 passengers (over 178,436 one-way trips). Beach Train Ridership (1996-2004) 140007 12000 10000-7 80001 6000 4000 2000 0 �°,cb6 �°,c1 �°'�� ��� OO° OON O°ti OOn' O°D" *2nd Train 1st Train Agenda Item 6T 230 Key to the success of the Beach Train Program is the successful marketing sponsorship with the Press -Enterprise newspaper and PE.com. The sponsorship provides free ads in the Press Enterprise, Business Press, and La Prensa newspapers, a website, on-line ads, voice automated information line, on-line ticket sales, and corporate sponsors. One of the issues impacting the decrease in ridership this year was the loss of a major sponsor who bought 1,400 tickets in 2003 and the lack of a shuttle at the San Clemente Pier. Another key element is our partnership with our local ticket outlets: Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley, and San Bernardino Parks and Recreation Departments, and the Rialto City Clerk's Office. Because the Beach Trains are a charter service, tickets must be purchased in advance and cannot be purchased at the Station from the ticket vending machines. The donated staff time and marketing efforts by the ticket outlets provide valuable support in increasing ticket sales. The Metrolink train crew, deputies, and Beach Train Attendants (RCTC Casual Employees) work as a team to ensure a safe, comfortable, train ride. This year our promotional efforts included a special KFROG fishing trip. The 2004 season was faced with many challenges that affected ridership. The first obstacle was that the San Clemente Chamber of Commerce decided not to fund the local shuttle from the pier up the hill to the shopping district in town. Based on more than a hundred of passenger complaints received on this issue, the lack of a shuttle discouraged many riders from taking multiple trips on the Beach Train. Another challenge was the partnership with OCTA, designed to generate additional ticket sales by allowing stops in Orange County. The additional stops generated about 100 new Orange County riders. In addition, the advertised events at the Orange County stops were not supported with any transportation and resulted in significant dissatisfaction to the riders who wanted to try out the Orange County events. The overall budget for the program is $278,000, however thanks to passenger fares and the sponsorship of the Press -Enterprise and other vendors, RCTC has recouped all but $55,286. Not all costs for the 2004 season are confirmed as yet, but it appears that the season will result in a subsidy of approximately $2.37 per trip. The Beach Train provides valuable exposure of public transit for people who might not otherwise take the train! In fact, a survey of Beach Train riders found that 62 percent of those taking the Beach Train had never ridden Metrolink until they rode the Beach Train. The Beach Train also serves as a demonstration for regular weekend service on the IEOC Line. During the next few months, staff will pursue discussions with funding partners OCTA and SANBAG to establish regular weekend service on the IEOC Line. Attachment: 2004 Beach Train Season Overview • • • Agenda Item 6T 231 2004 Beach Train Season Overview Highlights The 2004 Beach Train season concluded Sunday, October 3rd. The season provided 20 train dates this year and sold 10,431 tickets for $134,017 in sales. This was down from the previous year, primarily due to the loss of Singh Chevrolet as a sponsor who purchased 1,400 tickets in 2003. If you remove the Singh Chevrolet group purchase, ticket sales were down 295 tickets or 2.75%, yet up $2,942 or 2.24% in sales revenue with a higher average ticket price of $12.85. The 2004 Beach Train season was filled with many innovative ideas and accomplishments. One was the KFROG Beach Train Fishing Trip contest, where for a week Scott & Bo of the morning show were promoting the Beach Train and giving away tickets for a Beach Train Fishing Trip. On August 1st, the KFROG group of 40+ rode the train to San Juan Capistrano and then transferred them to Dana Point for their fishing excursion which all went smoothly. There was a KVCR Promotion with on -air advertising for the Beach Train and a ticket giveaway. The online ticket sales on the updated web site take off and more than triple last year's sales. New Beach Train flyers and tote bags were distributed. Also new flyers were distributed to cross promote weekday Metrolink service and Project Wipeout that provides beach safety information. The October 3rd San Clemente Chowder Festival was the largest ridership day of the year with 1,030 paid tickets. The 2004 season was faced with many challenges that effected ridership. The first obstacle was that the San Clemente Chamber of Commerce decided not to fund the local shuttle from the pier up the hill to the shopping district in town. Based on more than a hundred of passenger complaints received on this issue, the lack of a shuttle discouraged many riders from taking multiple trips on the Beach Train. Another challenge was the partnership with OCTA, designed to generate additional ticket sales by allowing stops in Orange County. The additional stops generated about 100 new Orange County riders. In addition, the advertised events at the Orange County stops were not supported with any transportation and resulted in significant dissatisfaction to the riders who wanted to try out the Orange County events. RCTC had the opportunity to work with returning partners in 2004 that included The Press -Enterprise, PE.com and a new sponsor Grease Monkey. Sponsors who elected not to return this season were Singh Chevrolet, the San Clemente Chamber of Commerce, and the Pepsi Bottling Group. We will work in the off season to try to reinstate these sponsorships. Partnerships with The Press Enterprise and PE.com allowed for the continuance of the NewsLink information line and hosting/maintenance of www.TakeTheBeachTrain.com. NewsLink resulted in over 3,121 calls, and 349 direct connects to the RCTC Beach Train information line. The web site had 528,860 impressions (the number of times a page is downloaded). 232 Once again, partnerships were maintained with Ticket Outlets: Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley and San Bernardino Parks and Recreation Departments, Rialto City Clerk's Office, Amtrak, and the online service through the Beach Train web site. This ticket distribution network continues to provide convenience and options for our passengers. Beach Train activities offered on -board drawings that included Gift Certificates to Knott's Berry Farm, the Thorton Winery, the Mission Inn, and Angels Train/Baseball tickets. Additionally, a drawing of completed surveys was conducted each train day for free Metrolink 4 -Trip Tickets. Also special events were scheduled at Beach Train destinations that included the San Clemente Ocean & Chowder Festivals, Arts & Crafts Fair, and Harbor Days in Oceanside. Train Sales Overview Listed below are sales resulting from the 2004 season. Table 1. Sales from May 1 - October 3, 2004 Does not include Promotional Tickets) RCTC Mail Order* Amtrak Corona 621 $22,990.00 $1,540.00 $8,161.50 $9,211.00 Moreno Valley Rialto 678 1,836 $24,137.50 Riverside 2,028 $26,718.50 San Bernardino 2,267 211 $29,741.50 Online Sales 861 Total 10,431 • Singh 10,431 8.25% < . 00% $11,517.00 $134,017.00 252 656 752 2,039 2,375 2,296 230 12,126 $134,017.00 10,726 $37,962.50 $4,032.00 $8,457.50 $10,044.50 $26,384.50 $30,940.00 $29,651.50 $3,203.00 $150,675.50 $131,075.50 * Includes Twenty Two (22) Season Passes (or 440 Tickets) Train Dates The top five selling train dates for 2004 were: Table 2. Top 5 Train Dates by Number of Tickets Sold 3 -Oct -04 1,070 17 -Jul -04 18 -Jul -04 14 -Aug -04 24 -Jul -04 1,021 866 790 798 ckets old 1,030 1,004 815 753 742 40 Chowder Festival (SC) 17 51 37 56 Ocean Festival (SC) Ocean Festival (SC) Antique Car Show Santa Ana (No one departed at that stop) Drawing — Angels Train Tickets • • 233 • • Season Pass Twenty -Two (22) season passes have been sold; there were two (2) child passes and twenty (20) adult tickets for total sales of $3200. This represents an increase of 49% over last year (15 season passes at $2150). Train Sales by Date & Outlet See table below for information on total number of tickets sold per outlet plus promotional tickets. Trains Dates Pass Sales Outlet Subtotal Promo Total Mail Order Amtrak Corona Moreno Valley Rialto Riverside San Bernardino Online Sales 26 -Jun -04 22 29 15 8 49 49 51 2 225 145 370 27 -Jun -04 22 20 40 19 11 54 34 5 205 51 256 10 -Jul -04 22 90 23 57 43 108 131 26 500 49 549 11 -Jul -04 22 21 14 20 34 19 7 21 158 49 207 17 -Jul -04 22 191 9 47 50 200 241 175 69 1,004 17 1,021 18 -Jul -04 22 230 49 38 150 126 149 51 815 51 866 24 -Jul -04 22 126 38 50 36 150 138 148 34 742 56 798 25 -Jul -04 22 51 4 21 20 29 60 46 30 283 70 353 31 -Jul -04 22 49 6 35 50 122 142 150 19 595 54 649 1 -Aug -04 22 82 31 38 82 63 131 41 490 45 535 7 -Aug -04 22 67 46 43 103 126 122 50 579 75 654 8 -Aug -04 22 77 9 50 50 64 130 150 34 586 59 645 14 -Aug -04 22 55 50 35 194 114 163 120 753 37 790 15 -Aug -04 22 72 2 20 25 90 87 81 24 423 53 476 21 -Aug -04 22 86 6 15 48 104 56 175 17 529 66 595 22 -Aug -04 22 40 1 25 12 46 66 47 14 273 104 377 18 -Sep -04 22 129 12 28 76 177 116 86 646 61 707 25 -Sep -04 22 29 10 30 45 25 93 40 294 51 345 2 -Oct -04 22 36 18 21 38 61 79 26 301 54 355 3 -Oct -04 22 163 22 50 50 206 186 219 112 1,030 40 1,070 Total 440 1,643 97 621 678 1,836 2,028 2,267 821 10,431 1,187 11,618 From the data contained above, the average total Beach Train boarding per date was 592, which is 60% of capacity. Preliminary estimates show a subsidy per trip of $2.37. PE.com Update Banner Ad for TakeTheBeachTrain.com Report Period May 1 — October 3 Prior Impressions Clicks Year Variance 528,860 1,249 611 204% 234 Newslink Update The Newslink information line (222-7000) generated the following activity: Newslink Season to Date May 1 - October 3 2004 Take The Beach Train Newslink Call count 5/1-10/3/04 Calls In Access Time Direct Connect 2325 Main Menu 1662 1462.9 186 2326 Train Dates 396 955.6 50 2327 Departure 250 443 22 2328 Destination 116 120.9 15 2329 Prices 321 478 44 2330 Purchase 214 531.2 17 Subtotal 2959 3991.6 334 2310 Spanish Menu 27 10.2 2 2311 Spanish Dates 8 5.9 0 2312 Spanish Dep. 4 2.7 0 2313 Spanish Dest. 3 1.5 0 2314 Spanish Prices 4 2.3 0 2315 Spanish Purch. 4 1.4 2 Subtotal 50 24 4 Metrolink 112 51.2 11 2004 Totals 3121 4066.8 349 2003 Totals 4701 5077.6 667 % Change -34% -20% -48% • • 235 • • Beach Train Drawings On -board Beach Train drawings resulted in the following winners/prizes: June 26 July 10 July 24 July 31 August 7 - Angels Baseball Train Tickets John White of Riverside Sunday Brunch for 2 at Thornton Winery Viki Whallon of Upland d Angels Baseball Train Tickets John Lockwood of Apple Valley Knott's Berry Farm Gift Certificate Patricia Yarber of Compton Angels Baseball Train Tickets Larry Voll of Riverside September 25- Mission Inn Gift Certificate Cherlye Eller of Romoland Drawings for Metrolink 4 -Trip tickets were also conducted for Beach Train passengers who filled out surveys on the return trip home. The lucky winners were: June 26 - Idamay Bradshaw of Riverside & Gloria Cervantes of Rialto June 27 — Margaret Green of Highland & Lisa Mesa of Riverside July 10 — Mike Keith of Colton & Esperanza Ibanez or Riverside July 11 — Donna Woody of Moreno Valley & Suzie Mariedth of Sun City July 17 — Pamela Harris of Upland & M Adams of Corona July 18 — Cassie Nefwani of Moreno Valley & Kelli Mendez or Highland July 24 — Julia Luna of Upland & Mia Hardin of Hesperia July 25 — Joan Hunsaker of Riverside & Ed Hayden of Riverside July 31 — Yolanda Harris of Redlands & Toni Ditty of San Bernardino Aug 1 — Noelle Kreider of Highland & Dianne Mugg of Alta Loma Aug 7— Evelyn Brummel of Los Angles & Linda Brothers of Moreno Valley Aug 8 — Sue Wolf of Riverside & Kimberly Cain of Riverside Aug 14 — Cindy Blackenstock of Upland & Bob Dew of Highland Aug 15 - Linda Taylor of Colton & F.N. Maxwell of Corona Aug 21 - Pamela Johnson of Moreno Valley & Daniell Wilhoite of SNB Aug 22 — Evan Green of Redlands & Richard Lauri or Rialto Sep 18 — Teri Stock of Ontario & F.A. Edwards of Redlands Sep 25 — Eric Benitez of Beaumont & Marianna Fowles of Highland Oct 2 - Karen Nagy or San Bernardino & Mary Sculler of Yucaipa Oct 3 - Barbara Guerro of Riverside & Evan Green of Redlands 236 Beach Train Surveys Beach Train surveys were distributed on the return trip of all train dates. Provided below is a summary of survey responses received. 26 -Jun -04 27 -Jun -04 10 -Jul -04 11 -Jul -04 17 -Jul -04 18 -Jul -04 24 -Jul -04 25 -Jul -04 31 -Jul -04 1 -Aug -04 7 -Au • -04 8 -Aug -04 14 -Au -04 Onboard Drawing for Angels' Train Baseball Tickets Farmers Market (SC) Drawing — Sunday Brunch for 2 at Thornton Winery in Temecula Farmers Market (SC) Ocean Festival (SC) Ocean Festival (SC) Onboard Drawing for Angels' Train Baseball Tickets Farmers Market (SC) Onboard Drawing for Knott's Berry Farm Tickets Arts and Crafts Fair (SC) Onboard Drawing for Angels' Train Baseball Tickets 15 -Aug -04 21 -Aug -04 22 -Aug -04 18 -Sep -04 25 -Sep -04 2 -Oct -04 3 -Oct -04 Fiesta Street Festival (SC) Antique Car Show (SA) Farmers Market (SC) World Bodysurfing Championships (0) World Bodysurfing Championships (0) Oceanside Harbor Days (0) Onboard Drawing for Mission Inn Restaurant Gift Certificate Craft Fair (LN) Seafest & Chowder Festival (SC) 370 549 798 649 654 138 186 117 247 273 178 173 133 37% 39% 34% 57% 22% 27% 30% 20% 25% 476 595 377 707 345 188 199 156 220 167 39% 33% 41% 31% 48% 38% 18% O — Oceanside SC - San Clemente Surveys are distributed on the return portion of the trip and collected by the attendants. This year we surveyed 30% of the riders which is sufficient to give us a good representation of trends and opinions of the overall ridership. Also for the first time, our clerk was able to quickly enter all the surveys into the system so we could provide feedback directly to the staff prior to the next beach train run. Questions from Beach Train surveys continue to provide RCTC with vital information to improve the overall Beach Train experience. Provided below is a summary of the results obtained from survey data. • • • 237 • 1. How did you hear about the Beach Train? 2004 Newspaper Web Site Employer/Co-Worker Family/Friends Metrolink Station Park & Rec/City Clerk Repeat Customer Other 15% 13% 26% Newspa pers Web Site Employer/Coworker Friends/Family Metrolink/Stations Park & Rec/City Clerk Repeat Customer Other Prior Year Responses to this question changed slightly from the previous season. There was a slight increase in the effectiveness of the newspaper ads and web site. Still word of mouth between family and friends is the bulk of our responses. 2. How many times have you ridden the Beach Train? 2004 20% 8% 5+ 4 3 16% 2 47% 1 19% 7% 5+ 4 Prior Year 17% 8% 3 2 49% 1 The Beach Train continues to attract new customers. The comparison between 2004 and 2003 seasons shows little change. There is almost an even split between first-time riders and those who have been on the beach train at least once before. It is impressive the loyalty of those who have been on the train 5 or more times. 238 3. Where did you spend the majority of your time today? 2004 68% 18% Oceanside San Clemente 14% San Juan Capistrano 22% Oceanside Prior Year 71% San Clemente 6% <, .,; 1 San Juan Capistrano The data contained above is consistent with 2003. There was an increase (+8%) of customers who selected San Juan Capistrano as their Beach Train destination. This is most likely attributed to lack of a shuttle in San Clemente and more people choosing San Juan Capistrano as an alternative shopping destination. 4. On a scale of 1-5 with 5 being "best", how do you rate the combination of beach and other tourist activities today? Don't Know 2% One «1% Two _, 3% Three Four Five 2004 14% 32% Prior Year Don't Know 2% One Two Three Four Five 1% 2% .':112% 30% • Favorable responses were relatively unchanged from 2003 (from 82% to 80%) indicating that customers enjoy Beach Train activities. The largest complaint was the lack of the San Clemente shuttle that could have influenced this statistic. • 239 • • • 5. On your trip today, please indicate your primary activity. 25% Both 2004 24% Touring/Shopping 51% Beach 26% Both Prior Year 23% Beach Touring/Shopping 51% Based on customer response received, the primary purpose for riding the Beach Train is to go the beach. The number of people who prefer to do both dropped by 1%. 6. In addition to the purchase of Beach Train tickets, please indicate your total expenditures at the beach today. Out of 3,500 surveys, 3,457 (99%) responded to this question. 2004 San Clemente 73% Avg/Day $8,793' Oceanside 14% - Avg/Day $1,651 San Juan Capistrano ------ 14% Avg/Day $1,649 Prior Year San Clanton 73% Avg/Day $7,620 Oceanside 19% - Avg/Day $1,954 San Juan Capistrano 8% Avg/Day $809 The above data represents 1/3 or 30% of the total projected Beach Train customer base. From this analysis, further projections were made on potential revenue generated per Beach Train destination representing total projected customers (see table below San Clemente Oceanside San Juan Capistrano Totals 401 107 84 592 $ 75.09 $ 52.84 $ 67.33 $65.09 $30,112 $5,654 $5,655 240 7. Prior to taking the Beach Train, had you used Metrolink services? 2004 Prior Year This response has changed a little from last season, with 4% more riders never traveling on a Metrolink train. Now almost 2/3 of the Beach Train responders were first-time Metrolink riders. This information further indicates that this special charter service continues to be an effective marketing tool for attracting new Metrolink riders from a different target market (recreational vs. weekday commuter). Beach Train Rider Profile Ethnicity Out of 3,500 surveys, 2,962 (85%) provided the following responses: 2004 African American Asian American Caucasian Hispanic/Latino Native American Other 3% Prior Year Africa n American Asian American Caucasian Hispanic/Latino 2% Native b 2% American 8% Other 01 4% For marketing purposes, rider profile information can be quite helpful in determining who your existing customers are. It also provides data to assist in the development of advertisements that will appeal to a broader target market. From the data collected in 2003 and 2004, the market for the Beach Train is basically unchanged. • 241 • • • Age Range Out of 3,500 surveys, 2,916 (83%) provided the following responses: 2004 Under 18 f ; °"'`I 4% 18-30 31-45 46-60 60+ 10% Prior Year Under 18 `' 5% 18-30 z ,1 10% 31-45 46-60 24% 60+ Molhhok 21% As with Ethnicity, this category is basically unchanged from last year. Once again, the most prevalent group is between the ages of 31-60 representing 62% in 2004 and 64% in 2003 of the total population. The data further indicates a 3% increase in the 60+ age group. The reduction in the under 18 category could be a result of Beach Train staff targeting adults when dispensing surveys for completion. Household Income Out of 3,500 surveys, 2,634 (75%) provided the following responses: $25,000-$15,000 $35,000-$26,000 $45,000-$36,000 $55,000-$46,000 $65,000-$56,000 $75,000-$66,000 Over $75,000 2004 9% 9% 13% 12% 16% 18% $25,000-$15,000 $35,000-$26,000 $45,000-$36,000 $55,000-$46,000 $65,000-$56,000 $75,000-$66,000 Over $75,000 Prior Year Again, the data reveals basically no change from last season relating to the Beach Train target market's range of household income. 242 County of Residence Out of 3,801 surveys, 3,434 (90%) provided the following responses: 2004 Orange 1% Other 0% Prior Year Other 4% The Beach Train may be viewed as a charter service for Riverside County residents; however, the data contained above states otherwise. From the sample population, San Bernardino County residents slightly outnumber Riverside County residents. In addition the 2004 data shows that the additional Orange County stops generated only 1 % of the ridership. Survey Comments Out of 3,500 surveys completed, 2,015 contained comments. Comments were divided into three major categories: Praise (Positive Feedback), Desired Enhancements (Suggestions), and Complaints. Within these categories, information was divided into subcategories. Provided below is a summary of survey comments. Praise — 67% of Total General Onboard Train Boarding Destination This category represents Praises (positive feedback) received from the sample population. It was further divided into five subcategories: general, staff, onboard train, boarding, and destination. General comments are broader than most at 73% of total, followed by 21% relating to staff. This category is a good indicator that people appreciate this special service we provide. See Appendix A for actual survey comments in this category. • 243 • • • Enhancements - 10% of Total General i=1 7% Onboard Train Schedule Boarding 6% Destination Assigned Seats 7)3% 3% Ticketing ' ` 3% More Cars 1% Staff 3 1% 12% 24% Complaints — 23% of Total Schedule General Onboard Train Boarding Destination Staff Ticketing 14% 3% 8% 25% 7% Enhancements (or suggestions) are comments received from the population providing alternatives to existing operational procedures. This category was divided into many subcategories in order to allow for a broader view on what Beach Train customers want or what changes/revisions they would like to see relating to not only operations, but ticketing, boarding, etc., affecting the overall Beach Train experience. This area provides new ideas for future improvements. See Appendix A for actual survey comments in this category. Not every trip is perfect and it is important for us to get feedback to improve the service. From this information, operations and other functions of the Beach Train are changed or modified to address as many concerns as possible. This year a majority of the complaints were about the destination. This primarily deals with the fact that for the first time there was no San Clemente Shuttle service with over 160 complaints. In addition all of the people who went to the Laguna Niguel Craft Fair complained about transportation and that there was not enough to do. The onboard train complaints ranged from the public address system not working well, to lack of toilet paper, to issues with seating assignments. See Appendix A for actual survey comments in this category. AGENDA ITEM 7 � i5 i,.. REVISION TO AGENDA ITEM 7 Additions noted by Bold Italics Deletions noted by Strikethrough RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: AB 3090 Reimbursement / State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Amendment for State Route 60 Widening Project from Valley Way to Interstate 15 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Commit $13.046 million of local Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds as a loan to replace $3.261 million of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds and $9.785 million of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds for the SR 60 widening project; 2) Enter into Agreement No. 05-31-528, an AB 3090 agreement, with Caltrans and designate the SR 60/1-215 East Junction direct connector as a replacement for the SR 60 widening project by programming $13.046 million ($3.261 million RIP and $9.785 million IIP) in FY 2007-08; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement, on behalf of the Commission; and, 4) Commit future RIP funds with interest (e.g. Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), or commercial paper) on designated interchanges on the TUMF network as repayment of the $13.046 million TUMF loan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The continued suspension of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) allocations is causing a serious issue with the SR 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) and Mixed Flow widening project from Valley Way to Interstate 15. Of immediate concern is the approaching expiration date of the environmental document, which is June 2005. Over the past year, staff has turned to the board to salvage funds on the SR 60 HOV project brought on by the state budget crisis. In early 2002, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) suspended Traffic Congestion Relief (TCR) allocations, leaving $21 million of TCR funds unavailable for SR 60 project. In October 2003, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) approved $21 million of federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program funds to replace the suspended TCR funds. Then in July 2004, RCTC approved up to $5 million of additional CMAQ funds to cover recent increases in project construction costs. In August 2004, staff and Caltrans submitted a STIP allocation request for $3.261 million of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds and $9.785 million of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds. The request was denied due to lack of available STIP funds. With the uncertainty of allocations being granted for the next several months, we are again reviewing funding options to avoid additional delays and keep the environmental document from expiring. Therefore, staff proposes to loan $13.046 million of local Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds to replace the RIP and IIP funds and to allow the project to move to construction in Summer 2005. Repayment of the TUMF loan will be in the form of a commitment of future RIP funding including interest (e.g. Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), or commercial paper) on designated interchanges on the TUMF network. This action, if approved, would be processed through an AB 3090 STIP Amendment, which allows agencies that advance STIP projects with local funds to reprogram the STIP funds to another project or receive a cash reimbursement. Since the likelihood of receiving a cash reimbursement is extremely low given the current financial climate, our only option is to put the funds on another "replacement" project. In this case, we would propose that the $13.046 million RIP and IIP funds be reprogrammed on the SR 60/1-215 East Junction connector project. As you may recall, a similar action was approved at our May 7, 2004 Commission retreat for the SR 91/Green River interchange improvement project. In order to avoid a two-year delay, the Commission approved a $13.4 million loan from the TUMF program with repayment (including interest) in the form of a commitment of future Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds to be programmed on "federalized" TUMF projects, such as the Mid -County Parkway or the Route 79 realignment project. The Commission also approved reprogramming the $13.4 million of IIP funds from the SR 91/Green River Interchange to the SR 60/1-215 East Junction connector project. This approved action will be processed through an AB 3090 STIP amendment once the SR 91/Green River project receives environmental clearance. Agenda Item 7 Today's action, if approved, combined with the May 2004 action would result in allowing the SR 60 widening and SR 91/Green River interchange projects to continue as scheduled by replacing the delayed STIP funds with local TUMF funds. These two actions also result in approximately $26 million of STIP funds for the SR 60/1-215 East Junction project ($13 million from SR 60 HOV and $13 million from the SR 91/Green River Interchange), and a commitment to repay the TUMF loan by programming future STP and STIP funds on TUMF network projects. Agenda Item 7 PROJECT FUNDI NG REVISIO NS RESULTI NG IN EARLY DELIVERY OF HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS SR 60 Widening Original Approved Funding fo r Con struction: (000's) r SR 91/Green River IC Original Appro ved Funding for C onstruction: (000's) 60/215 E Jct Connector Appro ved Funding: (000's) HP (from Green River) $ 13,400 TCR $ 21,000 TCR $ 590 Total $ 13,400 RIP $ 3,261 RIP $ 3,889 HP $ 9,785 IIP $ 13,400 12/08/04 Proposed Re vised Funding: Total $ 34,046 DEMO $ 4,364 HP (from Green River) $ 13,400 Total $ 22,243 RIP (fr om SR 60) $ 3,261 7/11/04 - RCTC Revised Funding: HP (from SR 60 $ 9,785 *CM AQ $ 25,000 5/07/04 - RCTC Re vised Funding: Total $ 26,446 RIP $ 3,261 TCR $ 590 HP $ 9,785 RIP $ 3,889 Note: Full funding for the 60/215 E Jct connector To tal $ 38,046 TUMF Loan $ 13,400 is dependent upon the preferred alternative . DEMO $ 4,364 Total cost of the alternatives range from $25 - *includes recent $4M const. cost increase Total $ 22,243 45M. 12/08/04 - Pro po sed Rev ised Fu nding: CMAQ $ 25,000 TUMF Loan $ 13,046 Total $ 38,046 Summary: Su mmary: Summary: • In October 2003 RCTC approved replacing • In May 2004 RCTC approved replacing IIP • The May 2004 RCTC action provided IIP funding $21 M of suspended TCR funds w CMAQ funds. funds with TUMF funds. for the 60/215 E Jct connector project . • In July 2004 RCTC approved an add'I $4M of CMAQ to cover increased construction costs. • In December 2004 staff recommends replacing • The Dec . 2004 RCTC recommendation provides for additional funding that will allow design w ork and construction funds to be programmed in the RIP and HP funds with TUM F funds. 2006 STIP cycle. Benefit: Benefit: Benefit: • If the December action is approve d, this will • Allows project to proceed with construction in • No Toss of IIP funds to Riverside C ounty allow the project to proceed with construction FY 2005/06 rather than be delayed until • Significant Commitment to 60/215 E Jct prior to the expiration of the environmental FY 2007/08. • Project necessary to transition 215 Corridor docume nt in June 2005. • Repayment will go to M eas "A" TUMF projects. • Per RCTC direction, repayment of TUMF funds will go to M id Co. Pkwy & SR79 realignment. project with SR 60 (thru Moreno Valley) grlir a/trans SOUND WALL STATE ROUTE 60 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY AT GLEN AVON NEAR RIVERSIDE FROM ROUTE 15/ 60 SEPARATION TO VALLEY WAY UNDERCROSSING 3.0 3. 6 LANE NO. 3 3,6 3.6 LANE r LANE NO. 2 NO. 1 MF "A " LINE SHLDR SHLDR 3 .0 1 : 1 3.0 i 10.7 & VARIES MATCH EXIST 230 mm PCC 120 mm LCB - 45 mm COLD PLANE AC PAVEMENT 45 mm COLD PLANE AC PAVEMENT_ 45 mm AC (TYPE A) 45 mm AC (TYPE A) 0 .8 HOV w MF 3.3 ICI 3.3 10.7 & VARIES MATCH EXIST 1 3.6 3 .6 3.0 LANE LANE 1 LANE NO . 1 NO. 2 NO. 3 ROUTE 60 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION SOUND WALL Rir rrs/rir 0014/11.1' Transportation Gtinmisiinn • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: AB 3090 Reimbursement / State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Amendment for State Route 60 Widening Project from Valley Way to Interstate 15 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Commit $13.046 million of local Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds as a loan to replace $3.261 million of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds and $9.785 million of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds for the SR 60 widening project; 2) Enter into Agreement No. 05-31-528, an AB 3090 agreement, with Caltrans and designate the SR 60/1-215 East Junction direct connector as a replacement for the SR 60 widening project by programming $13.046 million ($3.261 million RIP and $9.785 million IIP) in FY 2007-08; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement, on behalf of the Commission; and, 4) Commit future RIP funds (with interest) on designated interchanges on the TUMF network as repayment of the $13.046 million TUMF loan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The continued suspension of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) allocations is causing a serious issue with the SR 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) and Mixed Flow widening project from Valley Way to Interstate 15. Of immediate concern is the approaching expiration date of the environmental document, which is June 2005. Over the past year, staff has turned to the board to salvage funds on the SR 60 HOV project brought on by the state budget crisis. In early 2002, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) suspended Traffic Congestion Relief (TCR) Agenda Item 7 245 allocations, leaving $21 million of TCR funds unavailable for SR 60 project. In October 2003, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) approved $21 million of federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program funds to replace the suspended TCR funds. Then in July 2004, RCTC approved up to $5 million of additional CMAQ funds to cover recent increases in project construction costs. In August 2004, staff and Caltrans submitted a STIP allocation request for $3.261 million of Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds and $9.785 million of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds. The request was denied due to lack of available STIP funds. With the uncertainty of allocations being granted for the next several months, we are again reviewing funding options to avoid additional delays and keep the environmental document from expiring. Therefore, staff proposes to loan $13.046 million of local Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds to replace the RIP and IIP funds and to allow the project to move to construction in Summer 2005. Repayment of the TUMF loan will be in the form of a commitment of future RIP funding (including interest) on designated interchanges on the TUMF network. This action, if approved, would be processed through an AB 3090 STIP Amendment, which allows agencies that advance STIP projects with local funds to reprogram the STIP funds to another project or receive a cash reimbursement. Since the likelihood of receiving a cash reimbursement is extremely low given the current financial climate, our only option is to put the funds on another "replacement" project. In this case, we would propose that the $13.046 million RIP and HP funds be reprogrammed on the SR 60/1-215 East Junction connector project. As you may recall, a similar action was approved at our May 7, 2004 Commission retreat for the SR 91/Green River interchange improvement project. In order to avoid a two-year delay, the Commission approved a $13.4 million loan from the TUMF program with repayment (including interest) in the form of a commitment of future Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds to be programmed on "federalized" TUMF projects, such as the Mid -County Parkway or the Route 79 realignment project. The Commission also approved reprogramming the $13.4 million of HP funds from the SR 91/Green River Interchange to the SR 60/1-215 East Junction connector project. This approved action will be processed through an AB 3090 STIP amendment once the SR 91/Green River project receives environmental clearance. Today's action, if approved, combined with the May 2004 action would result in allowing the SR 60 widening and SR 91/Green River interchange projects to continue as scheduled by replacing the delayed STIP funds with local TUMF funds. • • • Agenda Item 7 246 • • • These two actions also result in approximately $26 million of STIP funds for the SR 60/1-215 East Junction project ($13 million from SR 60 HOV and $13 million from the SR 91 /Green River Interchange), and a commitment to repay the TUMF loan by programming future STP and STIP funds on TUMF network projects. Agenda Item 7 247 • AGENDA ITEM 8 • PRESENTATION • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Rail Department Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Presentation on Wayside Horn Demonstration in Riverside STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file presentation on the City of Riverside's Wayside Horn Demonstration Project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Safety is the primary concern at locations where railroad tracks intersect at grade with local streets. The Federal Railroad Administration requires the sounding of a train whistle/horn as a safety measure at each at -grade crossing. In fact, whistles are sounded in a long, long, short, long pattern starting 1/4 mile from all public highway/rail at grade crossings. As train traffic from the ports continues to increase, noise from train whistles continues to be a significant quality of life issue for communities. Federal, state, and local governments are working on new regulations and technology to mitigate noise from train whistles while maintaining safety. One such measure is the use of Wayside Horns designed to change the direction of the train horn. A presentation will be made by Tom Boyd, Deputy Public Works Director on the Wayside Horn Demonstration Project currently underway in the City of Riverside. Agenda Item 8 248 AGENDA ITEM 9 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: December 8, 2004 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Election of Officers and Selection of Representatives Executive Committee to the STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for: 1) The Commission to elect the officers of the Commission — Chair, Vice Chair, and Second Vice Chair; 2) The Cities of Riverside, Corona, and Moreno Valley to select their representative to the Executive Committee; and, 3) The Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, San Jacinto, and Temecula to select their representative to the Executive Committee. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Election of Officers In accordance to the Administrative Code, the Commission must annually hold an election of officers. The officers of the Commission shall consist of the Chair, Vice Chair, and Second Vice Chair. The Chair, the Vice Chair, and the Second Vice Chair shall annually alternate between a regular member of the Commission representing a city and a regular member of the Commission who is a member of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. During the year that the Chair is a regular member of the Commission representing a city, the Vice Chair shall be a regular member of the Commission who is a member of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and the Second Vice Chair shall be a regular member of the Commission representing a city. During the time in which the Chair is a regular Commission member who is a member of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Vice Chair shall be a regular member of the Commission representing a city, and the Second Vice Chair shall be a regular member of the Commission who is a member of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. The Vice Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence of the Chair and the Second Vice Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence of the Chair Agenda Item 9 249 and the Vice Chair. When so acting, the Second Vice Chair shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the Chair. For 2005, the Chair and the Second Vice Chair shall be a regular member of the Commission representing a city. This year, the officers are Roy Wilson (Chair), Robin Lowe (Vice Chair), and Jim Venable (Second Vice Chair). Election of Representative to the Executive Committee The membership of the Executive Committee shall be as follows: 1) The Chair of the Commission; 2) The Vice Chair of the Commission; 3) The Second Vice Chair of the Commission; 4) Past Chair of the Commission; 5) A regular member of the Commission representing one of the following cities: Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley; 6) A regular member of the Commission representing one of the following cities: Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, San Jacinto, and Temecula; 7) A regular member of the Commission representing the following cities: Blythe, Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage; and, 8) Three members of the Commission who are members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Such members shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. With the exception of the Chair, Vice Chair, and the Second Vice Chair, the term of the Executive Committee members shall be two years. For January 2005, two groups of cities will need to appoint their representative to the Executive Committee: 1) Riverside, Corona and Moreno Valley; and, 2) Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, San Jacinto, and Temecula. The current members — Frank West and Chris Buydos may be reappointed for another two year term. For city representatives, the term may not be more than 2 two-year terms, unless they were elected as officers. This is in accordance to the provision, under Section H3(b) of the Commission's Administrative Code. • • • Agenda Item 9 250 76105 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSION MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET December 8, 2004 NAME AGENCY E-MAIL ADDRESS c,.-- L -/C, . L / s rn ic)- l6 ��y�,o d� c_7C ���47 c--- .(.1(__ 9,—. 6-4'ee (‘ 1%79.1;7 61Y -e---- _ 'Gc`v/4 1?2c I maec4/a " // : //// / 4t , —c_e__ Na _v ,-/ ke 117/5y Ovr. 0 1 1 O r r-' `e,. ( 0'1 l., `-5 a,/S Z P'S%L' / 1`� [t�J e, ' 477(4)/t/.../-7, / %//4 �J 6- ,,27-1 / / �%? O � L n l if? e i" 1i. t ve i s e .[�a� J2i (Gkt f /4,--/ y9-eS,_ -- 7`� 711i `/€€ ON - /C-400. r 7�a v 2., 1 , vi , ` `y e c ri 9,Arts—� -, s/G- r -7-c d�1 \ 5. . y L-4 l. d. _ � U , % - '7 l-1 (1-3D p�\i: 41i/5 17 U t17 G� l -y % e1— PiS P A) S&� /1Z7k1Ug- . l/V L 2) ( 8 e2'14 (C�6-s}- 13 6 (L. L- c7.7- rte.. V iA, -� C ' \I\C \�� L_( "i -mi l 1 \ \:- _, c1 I'L O%�%A�PcNiG01ra7 L- T.va, C--1 �' jiPin 1�-it.Ya./ Coo h.e.46. �j�iz.lat e0q(c,�� co, !4/rL- / bt�1 QW i i tC 7 tZ -n \`/`c--_v(%L ((,, P'� ---Pti- RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL December 8, 2004 Present Absent ;;e,_./ c1R ` AJ P County of Riverside, District County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District III County of Riverside, District IV County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8