Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
04 22 2021 Agenda with back-up
April 16, 2021 CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: B OA RD MEMBER: ALTERNATE MEMBER: REGU LAR MEETING AND R EVIEW AND PLA NNING THUR SD AY , APRIL 22, COMM ISSION CHA MBER S FLORID A. I. II. IV . V. Thoma s Smith Malcolm Murphy Robert Dockerty S. Curtiss Roa ch Jorgette Smith Amanda Jones P UBLIC HEARIN G BEING HELD BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF 2021 AT 8:30 A.M ., IN T HE OF THE TOWN H ALL, 100 SEA A GENDA BY THE A RCHITECTURAL ST REAM, FLORIDA ON WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR . ROAD, GULF ST RE AM, Call to Orde r. Roll Call. Minute s of the R egular Mee ting and Public Hearing of 3-25-21. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items . Announcements. A. M eeting Dates 1. Re gular Meeting & Public Hearing a. April 22, 2021 at 8:30 A.M . b. M ay 27, 2021 at 8:30 A.M. c. June 24, 2021 at 8:30 A.M. d. July 22, 2021 at 8:30 A.M . e. No August M eeting VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. B. C. De claration of Ex-Parte Communication Administe r O aths Applications for Developme nt Approval 1. An applic ation submitted by D onald Day of Delray Awning LLC, Agent for Gulf Stream Golf Club, the owners of property located at 2401 N. Oce an Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally desc ribed as 14 Tracts of land, lying and being in the County of Palm Beach and the State Of a. Florida. Level 2 Architectural/Site Plan Review to per mit the installation of a 100ft. long by 26 ft. wide fabric patio awning over the front terrace of the club for outdoor dining. T he color and de sign of the awning will match those that are loc ated around other areas of the building. 2. An applic ation submitted by Willia m Wietsma, Age nt for Joanne F. Hayes , the owner of property located at 1060 N. O cean Blvd. , Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as the East 54 ft. of the West 262.5 ft. of Lot 14A and the East 54 ft. of the W est 262. 5 ft. of Lot 15A, Block D, Revised Plat of Block D and Block E, Palm Beach Sh ore Acres (Oc ean Boulevard Es tates) toge the r with an eas ement for ingress and egress over the South 15 ft. of the N orth 40 ft. of Lot 15A . a. Demolition Permit to remove struc tures on the property to prepare for new c onstruc tio n. b. Variance to per mit construction of a new dwelling on the same footprint, using the existing building setbacks of the exis ting building setbacks of the existing building, which are the same as the existing neighboring struc tures. AGEND A CONTINU ED c. Level 3 A rchitec tural/Site Plan R eview to permit the co nstruction of a 2,647 s q. ft. Gulf Stream Bermuda, single story dwelling, the finished floor elevation of whic h will be inc reas ed to 9. 53 NAV D (an increase of 1.5 ft.) to match that of the neighboring dwellings, and an attac hed garage. 3. Continued from the Public Hearing held on 2-25-21. An application submitted by Schulke, Bittl e & Stoddard, LLC, as Agent for the owners Stephen & Helen Benjamin, 1200 N. Ocean Blvd. and Thomas & Bettin a Smith, 1122 N. Oc ean Blvd. , which are legally d es cribed as Parcel 1: Golf Course Addition Lt 9 and Pa rcel 2: Golf Cours e A dd Lt 7 (LESS Ely 294.12 FT .) & Lot 8 (Les s WLY32.14 FT.) & 9-46-43, SLY 211.12 FT. of NLY 240 .12 FT. of ELY 112. 49 FT. of NE 1/4 LYG S of & ADJ TO TR R PB115P173 & W of & ADJ TO PB10P75 (LESS NLY 179.72 FT. of W LY 31.50 FT.) & NLY 29 FT. of ELY 720.49 FT. of NE 1/4 LY G S of & A DJ TO PB36 P110 & TR R PN B115P173 & W of & ADJ to PB 10P75. LEV EL III ARCHITEC TURAL/SITE PLAN REVI EW & DEMO PER MIT a. Construction of a new bulkhead landward of existing bulkhead. b. Construction of do cks & a boatlift. c. Const ruction of sit e walls to retain existing Grad es. An appli cation submitt ed by Chris Cab ezas, Landscap e Ar chite ct, as agent for, Stephen & Helen Benjamin, own ers of property locat ed at 1200 N. O cean Blvd ., Gulf Stream, Florida 33483, legally described as Parcel 1: Golf Cour se Addition Lt 9 and Parcel 2: Golf Cours e Add Lt 7 (LESS Ely 294 .12 FT.) & Lot 8 (Les s WLY32.14 FT.) & 9-46-43, SLY 211 .12 FT . of NL Y 240.12 FT. of ELY 112.49 FT. of NE 1/4 LYG S of & A DJ TO TR R PB115P173 & W of & ADJ TO PB10P75 (LESS NLY 179.72 FT . of WL Y 31.50 FT.) & NLY 29 FT . of ELY 720.49 FT . of NE 1/4 LYG S of & ADJ TO PB36 P110 & TR R PNB115P173 & W of & ADJ to PB10P75 for the following: a. Land clearing permit to remove 4 t re es in poor condition and install 2 native tr ees and 11 nativ e palms . b. Level II Archit ectural/Site Plan Review to p ermit land scaping improv em ents as per detailed drawing. VII. Item s by Staff . VIII. Item s by Board Member s. IX. Public. X. Adjournment. SHO ULD A NY INTE RESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISIO N MADE BY THE A RCHI TECT URAL REVIEW AN D P LANNING BOARD WITH RESPECT TO AN Y MA TTER CONSIDE RED AT THIS MEETING, SAI D PART Y WILL NEED A RECORD OF T HE PR OCEEDIN GS, AND FOR SUCH PU RPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBA TIM REC ORD OF THE P ROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHIC H RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPO N WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED . 286.0105, F.S.S. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, MARCH 25, 2021 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR. COMMISSION CHAMBERS OF THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Smith called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. II. ROLL CALL Town Clerk Taylor swore in Bob Dockerty, Jorgette Smith and Amanda Jones for another three-year term. Present and Participating: Also Present & Participating: Thomas Smith Malcolm Murphy Bob Dockerty Jorgette Smith Amanda Jones Gregory Dunham Edward Nazzaro Rita Taylor Absent w/notice: Curtiss Roach Chairman Vice Chairman Board Member Board Member Alternate Board Town Manager Staff Attorney Town Clerk Board Member Member III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 2-25-21. Vice Chairman Murphy made a motion to accept the minutes of February 25, 2021 with changes noted on pages 9 and 10 changing Vice Mayor Murphy to Vice Chairman Murphy. Board Member Dockerty seconded the motion with all voting AYE at roll call. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items. There were none. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. April 22, 2021 at 8:30 A.M. b. May 27, 2021 at 8:30 A.M. c. June 24, 2021 at 8:30 A.M. d. July 22, 2021 at 8:30 A.M. e. No August Meeting Chairman Smith called attention to these dates and stated he would not be present for the May meeting. Amanda Jones stated she would not be available for the May meeting. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Declaration of Ex-Parte Communication Board Member Dockerty stated he went to the Lemon Hill site and walked the property with Town Manager Dunham. B. Administer Oaths Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3,25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. Town Clerk Taylor swore in Mark Marsh, Dustin Mizell, Tom Barton, Tom Murphy, Stephen Benjamin, Kent Robbins, Bill Stoddard, Chris Cabezas, Arthur Tiedeman, John Gundlach, Joe Morris, Jennifer Morris, William Martin, C. Applications for Development Approval 1. An application submitted by Mark Marsh of Bridges, Marsh & Associates, as Agent for Mr. & Mrs. Christopher Ruth, the owners of property located at 3212 Gulf Stream Road, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as the north 75 feet of lot 24 and the south 50 feet of lot 25, at page 27 of the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida. a. Special Exception to permit additions to a single- family dwelling with existing nonconforming setbacks. b. Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit the addition of a 2 -car garage, a guest suite, loggia, and a minor addition to the west side of the master bedroom. Mr. Mark Marsh, Architect, called the house a colonial cottage in style and very traditional in its architectural statement. Mr. Marsh stated there had been renovations done but wanted to add some things that were normal for today's standards such as a two -car garage, a guest suite, family room, etc. He added they were coming before the board for a special exception of a non -conforming setback. Mr. Marsh pointed out that the house was skewed on the lot so that meant to him that the lot lines probably did not exist when the house was built, and it may have been a larger lot that had been subdivided. Mr. Marsh made a presentation presenting the two -car garage, an extension adding a family room and guest suite and a small expansion to the master bedroom. He explained some landscaping that would be done with two columns added to the front of the lot and a loggia and pergola in the back. Mr. Marsh stated they would be making the lot level as well and that the vegetation was well -established so they would be upgrading and supplementing wherever needed. Vice Chairman Murphy asked if there had been any comments from the neighbors to which Town Clerk Taylor answered there had been none. Board Member Smith asked what the landscaping was going to be next to the fireplace to which Mr. Marsh stated it was going to be a clusia hedge and two Japanese blueberry trees. Vice Chairman Murphy made a motion to recommend approval of a Special Exception to permit additions to a single-family dwelling with existing nonconforming setbacks. Board Member Dockerty seconded the motion with all voting AYE at roll call. Vice Chairman Murphy made a motion to recommend approval of a Level III Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit the addition of a two -car garage, a guest suite, and a minor addition to the west side of the master bedroom based on a finding that the construction of a two -car garage, a guest suite, and a minor addition to the west side of 2 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. the master bedroom meets the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. Board Member Dockerty seconded the motion with all voting AYE at roll call. 2. An application submitted by Mark Marsh of Bridges, Marsh and Associates as Agent for Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Maroni, the owners of property located at 330 Banyan Road, Gulf Stream, Florida which is legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, Polo Fields, Plat No. 1 according to the plat thereof and for Palm Beach County, Florida. a. Level 2 Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit a 59 square foot addition on the west side of the existing dwelling and the construction of a 482 sq. ft. pool cabana at the east end of the existing pool, replacing the existing awning. Mr. Mark Marsh, Architect, made a presentation seeking a 59 square foot addition on the west side of the existing dwelling and the construction of a 428 square foot pool cabana and stated it met all the setbacks and they were using all matching materials to what was already there. Mr. Dustin Mizell, Landscape Artist, explained the landscaping that would just be mirroring what was already present as well as upgrading with new vegetation along the wall because what was presently there was not growing. Vice Chairman Murphy asked if there had been any comments from neighbors to which Town Clerk Taylor answered there had been no comments. Vice Chairman Murphy made a motion to approve a Level II Architectural/Site Plan Review to construct a 59 square foot addition on the west side of the existing dwelling and the construction of a 428 square foot pool cabana at the east end of the existing pool, replacing the existing awning, based on a finding that the 59 square foot addition and the pool cabana meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following condition: 1. Any minor modification in the approved landscaping shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications to the approved landscape plan shall be submitted to the ARPB for review and approval before any commencement of work. Alternate Board Member Jones seconded the motion with all voting AYE at roll call. 3. Continued from the Public Hearing held on 2-25-21. An application submitted by Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC, as Agent for the owners Stephen & Helen Benjamin, 1200 N. Ocean Blvd. and Thomas & Bettina Smith, 1122 N. Ocean Blvd., which are legally described as Parcel 1: Golf Course Addition Lt 9 and Parcel 2: Golf Course Add Lt 7 (LESS Ely 294.12 FT.) & Lot 8 (Less WLY32.14 FT.) & 9-46-43, SLY 211.12 FT. of NLY 240.12 FT. 3 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing .Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. of ELY 112.49 FT. of NE 1/4 LYG S of & ADJ TO TR R PB115P173 & W of & ADJ TO PB10P75 (LESS NLY 179.72 FT. of WLY 31.50 FT.) & NLY 29 FT. of ELY 720.49 FT. of NE 1/4 LYG S of & ADJ TO PB36 P110 & TR R PNB115P173 & W of & ADJ to PB10P75. LEVEL III ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW & DEMO PERMIT a. Construction of a new bulkhead landward of existing bulkhead. b. Construction of docks & a boatlift. c. Construction of site walls to retain existing grades. Chairman Smith recused himself and Vice Chairman Murphy took charge of the meeting. Mr. William Stoddard, agent for Mr. and Mrs. Benjamin and Mr. and Mrs. Smith, stated there were several members of the team present to answer any questions raised at the prior meeting. Mr. Chris Cabezas, Landscape Architect, handed the Board Members a print-out of the landscaping stating it was a conceptual plan showing where they were going to beef up the landscaping on the northwest side to screen the views where the expanded waterfront is going. He added it would totally mask the views using a heavy canopy of trees, as well as large and small shrubs. Mr. Cabezas stated the hand- out also showed the rendering on the southern border. Vice Chairman Murphy referred to the minutes stating they needed to address the items the board asked them to address at the last meeting and asked if anyone would like to make comments. Mr. Tom Barton, a Gulf Stream resident, residing at 9 Driftwood Landing, stated his property was on the canal adjacent to the Benjamin property and just in front of the Smith property. He added that he was more affected by this project than anyone and the reason he did not speak at the last meeting was because he and Mr. Benjamin were trying to work out an arrangement of issues in dispute. After things did not work out, he engaged Tom Murphy to represent him, he said, and added that they had met with Mr. Benjamin and his lawyer on short notice from Mr. Benjamin. Vice Chairman Murphy asked if these issues were directly related to the items discussed at the last meeting to which Mr. Barton stated they were directly relevant to the entire construction process as it was right on his property line. Mr. Tom Murphy, Lawyer, representing Mr. Barton, as well as Mr. Terlizzi, who lives on the Intracoastal Waterway Canal in Driftwood Landing, stated that the parties were very close to a resolution. Mr. Murphy stated that Mr. Barton's seawall ends at approximately 40 feet east of the new proposed seawall going from west to east being constructed on the south side of the canal by Mr. Benjamin. He added that the legal description of Mr. Benjamin's property said, in part, that his property goes to the face of the bulwark and he was not acceding to the fact that Mr. Barton's land adjoins that 50 feet gave up his ???? rights. Mr. Murphy stated they were not going to litigate that but instead were going to go by 4 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. easements (of which there are five), with Mr. Benjamin offering a perpetual easement with respect to any encroachment by that 40 feet of the existing seawall because of the work that is done below the water and also the cap of the wall. They both share the seawall and came to terms that only adults can walk on the wall. There was a lot of discussion about the seawall on the Benjamin, Barton, and Smith properties and who would repair what and Mr. Murphy stated there was a clause written into the easement involving the new 50 feet that Mr. Benjamin would be able to park boats there for 23 hours temporarily and no more than 48 hours in any 30 -day period. Mr. Kent Robbins, Attorney for Mr. Benjamin, stated Mr. Murphy gave a good representation and that they worked well together. He stated everything would be resolved before the Commission Meeting and the ARPB could make mention of that in their recommendation. Board Member Smith wanted to know if all the points had been answered for the other neighbors that were concerned. Mr. Murphy added that when Mr. Benjamin finished the project the canal would need to be dredged, which was another issue that they were not there to discuss. Vice Chairman Murphy stated that the ARPB could make a conditional recommendation to the Commission, but they also had a responsibility to the neighbors other than Mr. Barton. Vice Chairman Murphy went back to the points mentioned in the minutes and asked if there were any comments regarding the landscaping. Mrs. Jennifer Morris, Gulf Stream resident living at 24 Hidden Harbour, stated there had been a lot of questions at the last meeting regarding construction damage to the road, the canopy, what kind of equipment, etc. and wanted to know if those were going to be answered. Vice Chairman Murphy wanted to know if the landscaping definition had met her concern to which Mrs. Morris answered she had not seen an elevation, just an aerial, and she believed that was secondary to the construction. Board Member Smith asked the landscape artist to expound on what the "large and small shrubs" entailed. Mr. Cabezas stated it was a variety of native trees for a canopy layer six feet and up and large shrubs three to six feet and then a bottom cover of 24" of a full screening with very little views inside. Board Member Smith asked about the species to which Mr. Cabezas stated they could use green buttonwood, black ironwood, silver buttonwood and that there were many choices, but they had not got to those details yet. Vice Chairman Murphy stated that a landscape plan had been requested and they would like to see one with an elevation, with detailed and itemized trees that was expected by the Town of Gulf Stream. Vice Chairman Murphy moved on to another point from the previous minutes regarding the canopy entrance and asked for comments. Mr. Arthur Tiedeman, contractor, explained that they would have a forty -to - fifty -pound excavator on a standard lowboy, was 12-13 feet tall and should not have any issues hitting the main part of the canopy and if there were any low-lying branches, he would trim them as needed. He added they would have one or two of those depending on availability and would also have a loader to load the material into the standard, tri- 5 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. axle dump trucks. Mr. Tiedeman stated that logistically this was the only option to haul out the materials because if they did it by barge, they would have to dig deeper than the canal could support. He added there would be a temporary fence and gate for access to prevent the least amount of impact on the road. Vice Chairman Murphy reiterated that at the last meeting it was brought up that there was a $5,000 damage bond, but if more were needed, the Town could challenge and ask for more. Board Member Dockerty asked what the approximate height on the lowboy was to which Mr. Tiedeman answered 12'6" to 13'. Board Member Dockerty asked what the height of the waste management truck was to which Mr. Tiedeman stated it was the same as the lowboy. Mrs. Morris pointed out on the landscape drawing that the access point they were discussing was going to be right through one of the trees they had stated they were not going to touch at the last meeting. There was a lot of commotion with residents in the audience so Vice Chairman Murphy asked if they could please speak one at a time and he stated this brought up another point from the minutes of the last meeting regarding no removal of aged trees. Mr. Tiedeman stated that an actual photo of the site rather than the drawing would be better show exactly where the access was going. Mr. Cabezas stated they had located an area where there would be space that would not affect any of the existing trees. Mrs. Morris disagreed and stated this was the exact opposite of what they said they were not going to do and wanted to review the minutes from the last meeting. She added that at the last meeting they had been told the machines would back in and cut through the outbuilding and the trees and now the access point shown by the pink line on the drawing showed the access right where the large trees are located. Mr. John Gundlach, Property Manager at Lemon Hill, stated what they were seeing was an arbitrary drawing and the access point was much further away from the trees and he tried to explain different coloring on the drawing and what each color meant. Mr. Morris suggested the ARPB take a visit to the site after they had marked out where they wanted to come in and then decide if they were going to need to move the trees. Vice Chairman Murphy agreed and reiterated that if this were to move forward, they would need a detailed landscape plan because the drawing they were given was unacceptable and hard to follow and, on a landscape plan, the specific access point would be shown. Mr. Morris stated he preferred that they come in on the east driveway, except for the excavator. Mr. Robbins stated that Mr. Benjamin agreed that they would provide detailed plans to staff before the Commission Meeting, as well as to the neighbors, that would clearly define the landscaping as well the driveway showing they would preserve the aged trees. Mr. William Martin, resident as 12 S. Hidden Harbour Drive, stated that he had issue with Mr. Tiedeman saying he would trim the tree as needed and did not like him being the judge of what should be taken down or trimmed. Mr. Tiedeman answered by saying he did not see anything that would cause issue or needed trimmed and stated he should 6 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. not be the one who makes that decision and apologized for making the statement earlier. Vice Chairman Murphy once again went through the checklist from the prior meeting minutes to make sure they had covered all points: • The canopy • The removal of aged trees • Road damage and any major damage above and beyond the $5,000 damage bond, the Town could get back from the applicant. Town Manager Dunham suggested that, as was done with the A1A project, they film the road and the rights of way to have a record of what it looked like before the work was done. Vice Chairman Murphy agreed that it seemed reasonable to have a before and after. At this point Board Member Dockerty stated he was not comfortable with the conceptual drawing presented and even though he thought this could work he was not comfortable with moving it forward to the Commission as presented. • Mrs. Touhey's Deed and two subdivisions - Mrs. Morris stated she was sent a copy of the deed and it was not clear, but she just knew after speaking with her that was her intention and she personally believed this violated her wishes, but legally it may not. Mr. Robbins stated that the covenant limited the size of the residence and permanent structures to 15,000 square feet and could not be subdivided. He added that Mr. Benjamin knew the restrictions and accepted them when he bought the property and all he is doing is enhancing his residential use and respecting the historical structure. Mr. Robbins stated they understood the concerns of the neighbors, they respected those concerns and would address those concerns. Town Manager Dunham reminded everyone of the timeline of the Commission Meeting and when documents needed to be received by the Town. Vice Chairman Murphy stated they could either move forward in sending the application to the Commission with conditions or have this application come back before the ARPB in more detail and with conditions they are requesting to see instead of sending it to the Commission without all the information, which is the job of the ARPB. Board Member Dockerty stated he would be willing to convene again so as not to hold up the Commission, but he could not vote on what was presented. Vice Chairman Murphy asked if that were possible to which Assistant Town Attorney Nazzaro stated it could be done but he did not know if was truly possible given the time frame before the next Commission Meeting. Vice Chairman Murphy stated along with the detailed landscape plan they would also like to see an elevation plan. Board Member Smith stated she would like to see it from every angle as well. Mr. Tiedeman stated he would get with Mr. Cabezas to work on dimensions, but he would still like to see them using the west side as he did not think Mr. Benjamin's driveway could handle the traffic that would incur. Mr. Morris disagreed and stated that he was a developer and understood what was 7 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing ,Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. going on. Mr. Tiedeman suggested they meet at the site and look at it together. Vice Chairman Murphy asked if the parties involved could get the information to the staff in time and then asked what the deadline was for that information getting in. Town Manager Dunham stated the information would need to be in by Monday, March 29. Discussion was had if the ARPB had a quorum to meet on Tuesday or Wednesday, March 30 or 31. A lot of commotion went on once again in the audience and Vice Chairman had to call the meeting back to order and have everyone return to their respective seats. Mr. Barton reminded everyone from experience that the Benjamin's were not good respecters of time and from his perspective he would like to see all the details on Friday, March 26, so he had time to look at the details and not be rushed. Mr. Barton stated that he understood the road damage and trees issues, but he was going to be looking at a quarry and open pit that was basically going to be digging and excavating on his property, his borderline, with dirt, debris, and dust everywhere. He added that Mr. Robbins had told him they would have someone there every day to clean up, but he wanted to ask the contractor excavating if he could assure him that his pool was not going to have to be drained, that all the debris and dust was not going to get on his new white patio and change the color or that he was not going to have to wash his windows every day. Mr. Tiedeman stated they could put a temporary fence up with a green privacy screen. Mr. Barton asked how high that went up to which Mr. Tiedeman answered eight feet. Mr. Tiedeman added that they were not going to be creating fine, fine dust and they would be digging in water so it would be coming out wet and they also could hose down the dig site as they worked to keep the dust to a minimum. Mr. Barton stated he would like to see something in writing in the event they did not do what they say they are going to do. Vice Chairman Murphy stated that was something that needed to be discussed between their lawyers. Mr. Barton stated there were five easements with a lot of legalese going over everything, but this issue was not on any of those documents. Mr. Robbins stated they would include more language and an additional letter would be written to include these issues Mr. Barton brought up. Vice Chairman Murphy stated they needed to work things out amongst themselves because it was the responsibility of the ARPB to make sure the neighbors were happy with things moving forward. Mr. Murphy reminded everyone that in the Town of Gulf Stream, the staff did not allow contractors to abuse the neighbor's rights and privileges. Mr. Martin expressed his angst regarding the bird sanctuary and what detrimental effects this project was going to have on it and wanted to know who was going to be looking after the wildlife. He reiterated his feelings from the prior meeting that this project just did not fit in with the neighborhood. Mr. Martin brought up the idea of the possibility of Mr. Morris buying an adjacent property, building a marina, and putting his 90 ft. yacht on the canal. He added he was disappointed that the Town had let the Lemon Hill project get as far as it had gotten in being considered. 8 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. Mr. Morris stated he would like to see drawings showing where the water was going to go during construction because they did not want it to go in the bird sanctuary. Vice Chairman Murphy asked if there was anything that would require the Department of Environmental Protections to get involved. Town Manager Dunham stated they would have to put up silt fencing to which Mr. Tiedeman stated they would put that around the stockpile and the edge of the property where it meets the bird sanctuary. Mr. Tiedeman added that it would be going through the Department of Environmental Protections as well as the Army Corps prior to the project beginning. Town Manager Dunham stated the silk fencing would need to be maintained daily. Board Member Smith asked when the DEP and Army Corp would be getting involved to which Mr. Stoddard answered they had already had discussions with them for an exemption permit for the construction of the bulkhead, a retention permit for the docks and a general permit for removal of the existing bulkhead. He added they were on board, but they were waiting until everything was approved by the Town before submitting the paperwork. Mr. Stoddard stated they could secure those permits in 45-60 days. Mr. Murphy questioned Mr. Stoddard and stated he thought they had already received approval from the DEP and Army Corps because that would be needed before submitting an application to the Town. Mr. Stoddard agreed that no construction could begin before the DEP and Army Corps permits were in hand, but the bird sanctuary would be through the Town. Mr. Robbins stated that the bird sanctuary had not been maintained since the 80s. He added it was fenced in, overrun by iguanas, raccoons and foxes and there were many exotic plants that were not appropriate for the sanctuary. Mr. Robbins stated there had been no investment by any government for maintaining that site and Mr. Benjamin had even asked what could be done. Mr. Robbins stated there needed to be an inventory of all the trees and the plants and he was not sure if the government had the money that it takes to do that, but it was definitely in disrepair. He suggested that the Commission needed to investigate this situation with the bird sanctuary and that Mr. Benjamin would like to be part of the solution because one of the reasons he purchased the property was because it was next to the bird sanctuary. Mr. Robbins stated the water would not be an issue on the bird sanctuary because there was a screening process. Mrs. Morris stated there were still too many unanswered questions and she wanted to make certain that the road, up to a certain point, was going to be repaved after the project was complete. She stated that she and her husband wanted an engineering proposal in writing that would get done. Mrs. Morris understood that the bird sanctuary had been deeded to the Town and she was not sure what Mr. Benjamin's rights were in cleaning it up. She added that she believed this project to be completely out of character for Gulf Stream and sets a bad precedent. Mrs. Morris brought up what Mr. Martin had stated earlier that if they eventually bought the property next to them what would stop them from digging up a boat basin since they have a larger boat than Mr. Benjamin. 9 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3.25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. Mrs. Morris stated that she understood Mr. Benjamin's seawall was going to stay in place as they dig behind it and that it would be holding back the water and soil of the canal, but she stated that his seawall was in poor shape and wondered what would happen if it collapsed during construction since it was also connected to Mr. Barton's seawall as well as the bird sanctuary. She wanted to know if Mr. Benjamin and Mr. Smith would be financially liable for the repairs if that happened. Mrs. Morris was also worried about the septic system and the drainage that would be coming to the north side. She was concerned that Mr. Benjamin may decide to get an even bigger boat and then they would have to look at that as well as she had heard that there was now a third boat in the picture. Mrs. Morris asked if it was true that you could not dock another boat alongside your boat to which the board members answered that was correct. She also wanted to know if the 30 X 50 carve -out for Mr. Smith was physically needed for Mr. Benjamin to maneuver his boat into the 100 X 100 boat basin. Mr. Benjamin stated it would be helpful. Mrs. Morris then asked about the dredging of the canal and how many homeowners it took to approve the dredging. Assistant Town Attorney Nazzaro stated the Town had tabled that since it was not part of this application but would look into it. Mrs. Morris spoke about the garbage cans and boat trailer that she had mentioned in the prior meeting and the issues that they had with Mr. Benjamin and how it was against Code as well as issues with her mailbox, etc. She stated the trailer had now been covered by camouflage, but that she could still see it. Vice Chairman Murphy stated those issues did not really have anything to do with the application at hand. Mr. Robbins then got up and stated this project was not complicated and there is no prohibition to do that and under Florida law or the property rights under the Florida Constitution they had a right to go forward with reasonable regulations by the ARPB. He stated they would get the additional information including landscape plans to staff by 2:00 on Monday, March 29. Vice Chairman Murphy stated that the application as presented and with the feedback given at the meeting that the package needed to be considered as a whole instead of trying to piece things from different meetings all together. He understood that from a logistical point the construction may not be difficult, but the interest and concerns from the neighbors had to be considered. Assistant Town Attorney Nazzaro stated that getting the information by 2:00, then the Town Manager having to review it, make a recommendation and then circulate to all the board members in time for a Tuesday meeting. Vice Chairman Murphy stated that trying to rush things led to the possibility of overseeing something and not fulfilling their responsibility as a board. Mrs. Morris responded to Mr. Robbins by stating this project was a big deal and nothing had ever been done like this in Gulf Stream and she did not want them to be setting a precedent and reiterated everything she had said earlier in the meeting. Mr. Morris stated that since the external permits had not been received there was no need to rush this 10 Minutes of ARPB Meeting & Public Hearing Held 3-25-2021 @ 8:30 A.M. application. Mr. Barton asked if this application was delayed or did not move forward what was going to happen to the existing compromised seawall to which Mr. Tiedeman stated they had done what they needed to do to keep it from falling short of building a new wall and thought it would stand the test of another year. Mr. Barton answered that everyone would see once the King Tides came in. Board Member Dockerty made a motion to defer the application to the next ARPB Meeting on April 22, 2021. Board Member Smith seconded the motion with all voting AYE at roll call. Mr. Benjamin stated that he thought everyone had the wrong idea and they were only trying to improve the neighborhood and property values. He added out of the ten canals in Gulf Stream, theirs was the smallest and they were just trying to increase their area a bit and stated his next-door neighbor, Mr. Smith, was in full support and they were working the issues out with Mr. Barton that he felt would be resolved within a couple of days. Mr. Benjamin apologized to the Morris's regarding the garbage can and boat trailer and stated he hated to see the application get delayed for another month. He added that they were affected by Mr. Barton's project and never complained. Mr. Benjamin stated the strip along the bird sanctuary was not a right-of- way, but deeded property and they had no intention of going into the bird sanctuary. He added that other neighbors may have gone into the sanctuary and done some trimming of their own and he thought something should be done about the bird sanctuary suggesting collaborating and making a charitable donation to improve things for everyone. Vice Chairman Murphy stated even with deferring another month, there was still time to do the project during the off-season and he handed the meeting back to Chairman Smith. VII. Items by Staff. There were none. VIII. Items by Board Members. There were none. IX. Public. There was none. X. Adjournment. Chairman Smith adjourned the meeting at 10:43 A.M. Renee Basel Assistant Town Clerk 11 T own of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA APPLIC ATION FOR DEVELOP MENT APPROVAL This fo rm is to be used for all development review applicati ons to be he ard by the Town of Gulf Str eam Architectural Review and Planning Board, B oard of Adjustment and/or Town Commission . To c omplet e th e fo rm properly, plea se revie w the accompanying. T own of G ulf Stream I nstruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay Its consideration.. ARPB File # 2.., - ,3 PART II. GENERAL INFOR MATION To be completed by all applicants. A. Project Information I. A.1. Project/O wner Name: Gulf Stream Gold Club I.A. 2. Project Address: 2401 N Ocean Blvd. Gulfstream, FL 33483 I. A.3. Project Property Legal Descriptio n: 3-46-43, GOV LT 3 (LESS NLY 1415 .27 FT LYG E OF OCE AN BLVD & 4-46-43 E 3/4 OF SE 1/4 LYG E OF ICW A/K/A GULFSTREAM GOLF CO URSE I.A.4. Proje ct Description (desc ribe in deta il, in clu ding # of s to ries, etc.) Install one fabric patio awning for fron t terrace of club for din in g. Size: 100' length X 26' projection I.A. 5. Square Footage of New Structu re or Addition: 2,600 Arc hite ctural style: Standard Slope shed style I. A.6. Chec k all that apply: ✓ Architectural/Site Plan Revie w North O ce an Bouleva rd O ve rla y (comple te section B) Demolition of Structure s (comple te section C) Land Clearing (complete s ec tion D) Special Exception (co mplete section E) Variance (complete section G) No n-reside ntial use s (complete Section F) I. A. 7. Propo sed F.F.E: B. Owner In formatio n I. B.1. Owner Address: Gu lf Steam Go lf Clu b 1.6.2. Owne r Phone Number: 561-27 0392 Fax: I.B.3. Owner Signature : C. A gen t Information I. C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: Donald C Day - Delray Awning LLC I.C. 2. Agent Addre ss: 80 N Con gress Ave. Delray Beach. EL 33445 I_C.3. Age nt Phone Number (0 ) 561-276-5381 Cell Fax NIA Type of Foundation: I.C. 4. A gen t Signa ture: C' Official Use Only Pre -A pp Date : ARPB Da te: App Date: Re commendation: Corn Date: TC Date: Decision: mow, Application for Development Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Page 2 Septembe r 2004 J Town of Gulf Stream PROJECT DESCRIPTION ��� PART III. AND JUSTIFIC ATION 4P� To be complet ed by all applic ants after pre -application conference with T own Staff. Plea be cfin, fJ g ut sheets only when necess ary and be sure to i nclude the appr opri /1 co pNe brief. Attach additional !//fsfr que stio n number f or e ach response. eio, T' A. Proje ct Description a nd Justification III.A. 1. In what zoning district is th e project site located? III.A.2. Is the pro ject compatible with the intent of the zoning district ? Explain: III.A.3. Is the pro ject consistent wi the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of th e Compre hensiv e Plan? No Explain: NI A III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? III.A.5. How are the following utilities being prov ide d to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage b. Sanitary Sewer c. Potable water . t� 1 d. Irriga tio n Water e. Ele ctricity f. Telephone g. Gas h. Cable Television III.A. 6. If the project involve s the erection of one or mo re structures, please de scribe how the structures are consistent with the crite ria in Section 66-144 of the Town of Gulf Stre am Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) PART IV. A DDITIONAL INFORMATION Sectio n A is to be completed by all a pplicants after pre -a pplica tion co nference with Town staff. Answe ring "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completio n of additional Sections as indicated. A. Addition al Appro vals /Requ irements IV.A. 1. Do es the project involve laond area(If within fifty fection et (50') f this the A1A (Northe coO cean . Bo ulevard) right-of-way? Yes IV. A. 2. Do es the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? Ye s g) (If "Yes", Section C of this part must be co mplete d.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing area rthe effilling of n portion o lion of as n exiNiiong vacant lot or mo re than fifty percent (50%) of the landscape (If "Ye s", Se ction D of this part must be complete d.) IV. A. 4. Does the project requ ire appro val of a Spe cial Exception? Yes No (If "Yes", Section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A. 5. Is the proct,at variance with any regulations containe d in the Zoning Co de? Yes (If " Yes", Se ction G of this pa rt must be comple ted.) Application for Development Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Page 3 Septembe r 2004 TOWN OF GULF ST REAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 21-13 Address: 2401 North Ocean Blvd. Propo sed Improvement: Approval Requested: Gross Lo t size : N/A Proposed Total Floor Area: N/A Zo ning District: OR Finished Floo r: N/A Owner: Gulf Stream Golf Club Agent: Donald C. Day, Delray Awning LLC To permit the installati on of a 100 ft. long by 26 ft. wide fabric p ati o awning over the fr ont terrace of the club for outdoor dining . The color and design of the awning will match those awnings that are l ocated ar ound other areas of the building . Level II Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit the installati on of a 100 ft. l ong by 26 ft. wide fabric patio awning over the fr ont terrace of the club for outd oor dining. The color and design of the awning will match tho se awnings that are l ocated around other areas of the building. Effective Lo t Area: N/A Allo wable: N/A Height: N/ A Eave Height: N/A Issues Co nsidered During Review: Sectio n 66-144 Standards: Regarding Level II architectura l/site plan review Section 70-70 (2): Floo r a rea calculatio ns under awnings Sectio n 70-102: Shutters and awnings Mo tions: Mo tion to a pprove a Level II Architectural/Site Pla n based on a finding that the installatio n of a 100 ft. lo ng by 26 ft. wide fa bric patio awning over the fro nt terrace of the club for o utdoo r dining that matches the co lo r and de sign of those awnings that are located around o ther area s of the building meets the minimum intent of the Design Ma nua l a nd applica ble revie w standards. AR PB Date: A pril 22, 2021 Action - Level II Architectural/Site Plan Review aims ila as O! A /N ON M l 00 !1 /1 1 �, 'I,) , .,� f, 1 1 , d t iii fi` / `/J / , Er' i iI/r !�l l' 1 y �,1/;/ r PI' I i I` i%/r/ri1 r . } /,/rP iI /t r"i/.1PI, r /1 1//1/1i 7I s / rrj l/ -t %/ /' //l if /1/q/fr // ///f f,,; f lit '7 /l 7 / •) '///,//// , /1 '/ f/ I/I /' a f / / j / J 1 /°' /Yl r' 1/ !1 '/,., / 'f ) ir ..- ." " 1 5 I P A L M " A L A I " I F 5 1 0 9 1 1 1 5 P R A M 1 1 a O I C A - H F A O 9 V T H F E W A L L N F L ' R F T U N N E L A L V F A S 4 7 . 6 P < Y G O V E R N M E N T L O T 3 P , 4 D O O R I I I I ���� g I n A G O V E R N M E N T L O T 3 U 7 B 4 o A 0 5 5 7 3 0 6 7 4 2 5 . 4 5 ' N 8 9 , 6 , 0 8 0 1 4 9 4 M A R E L L r q �� L E E . 4 0 9 , I I I I 1 1 R - 7 7 2 7 0 7 . 7 1 . 9 7 9 7 6 7 1 9 6 - - - - - 5 0 U M L I F E S E C T I O N 3 , T O R T I 9 i 4 6 5 0 0 1 7 7 R A N S E 4 3 E A S T + B 9 + 9 . 0 ' 6 + 3 9 + 2 7 + 2 I ' A l + 4 . 0 + 4 . / + 2 0 4 1 + + 2 3 ( ' I I I + 2 2 I I L E G E N D : C O N C = C O N C R E T E W . M . = W A T E R M E T E R F H = F I R E H Y D R A N T L P = L I G H T P O L E + 1 2 . 9 3 = E L E V A T I O N B A S E D O N N O R T H A M E R I C A N V E R T I C A L D A T L M 1 9 8 8 . S O U R C E P A L M B E A C H C O U N T Y B E A C H M A R K " G - 3 1 5 " T P = C O N C T R A N S F O R M E R P A D A . S C = A U T O S P R I N K L E R C O N N E C T I O N G T M H = G R E A S E T R A P M A N H O L E S S M H = S A N T A R Y S E W E R M A N H O L E C O . = S A N T A R Y S E W E R C L E A N O U T F L O O D Z O N E S X C O M A X N T Y P A N 1 N O 1 2 5 1 0 9 0 9 8 1 S U F F I X . ' F M A P D A T E 1 0 / 0 5 / 1 7 A E ( E L 0 ) C O M M U M T Y P A N E L N O . . 1 2 0 1 9 2 0 9 8 1 S U F F I X . F M A P D A T E 1 0 / 0 5 / 1 7 = W A L L 7 8 4 0 6 0 4 5 = F L O R I D A S T A T E P L A N E C O O R D I N A T E 9 6 5 3 1 _ 9 , 0 3 D A T U M = N A D 8 3 ( 9 9 0 A D 'U S T A E N T ) Z O N E = F L O R I D A E A S T Z O N E D I S T A N C E B A S E D O N U S F O O T A L L D I S T A N C E S H O W N A R E G R O U N D D E S C R I P T I O N . A S - B U L T S U R V E Y O F A P O R T I O N O F T I E G U L F S T R E A M G O L F C L U B C L U B H O U S E B E I N G I N G O V E R M E N T L O T 3 , S E C T I O N 3 T O W N S H P 4 6 5 0 0 T H , R A N G E 4 3 E A S T , P A L M B E A C H C O U N T Y , F L O R I D A . M A P O F A S - B U I L T S U R V E Y O W N E R : G O L F S I / S N A M G O L F C L U B A D D R E S S - 2 4 0 1 N O R T H O C E A N B L V D . G L ( F S T R E A M { F L C , D A 3 3 4 8 3 I F E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T E N S S U R V E Y W A S M A D E O R D E R M Y R E S P O N S B L E C H A R G E A N ) M E E T S T H E S T A N D A R D S O F P R A C T I C E A S S E T F O R T H B Y T H E F L O R I D A B O A R D O F P R O F E S S I O N A L S U R V E Y O R S A M R A P P E R S I N C H A P T E R 5 4 - 7 7 , F L O R I D A A 0 M ' M S T R A R V E C O L E , P U R S U A N T T O S E C T I O N 4 7 2 0 2 7 , F L O R I D A S T A T U T E S P A U L D . E N G L E w T v A L w u T R T a o u T T Y A L 4 A ' " ' " D A A N O S U R V E Y O R & M A P P E R # 5 7 0 8 L K E c " ' s A t i r a r s o A r o u A P F A O ' B R I E N , S U I T E R & O ' B R I E N , I N C . L A N D S U R V E Y O R S C E R T I F I C A T E O F A U T H O R I Z A T I O N 1 L 6 3 5 3 S U R V E Y O R A N D M A P P E R I N R E S P O N S I B L E C H A R G E : P A U L D . E N G L E 9 5 5 N . W . 1 7 T H A V E N U E . S U I T E K - 1 . D E L R A Y B E A C H , F L O R I D A 3 3 4 4 5 ( 5 6 1 0 2 7 6 - 4 5 0 1 7 3 2 - 3 2 7 9 F A X 2 7 6 - 2 3 9 0 0 , 1 O F S I R Y E Y , 0 , 7 0 E 2 8 2 0 7 8 f F 1 D 9 0 i M ' P A 0 2 8 2 5 S C D 2 E F N O : 9 1 - 8 4 t h C H " PROPOSED PROJECT IS LOCATED CN THE EAST SIDE CF AIA M GULF STREAM, FL. VICINITY MAP NOTES: I. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGSI 2. FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSION51 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT IF ANY PESCRIPANCY W/ DRAWNGS. (SEE GENERAL NOTES) 4. ALL AREA CALCULATIONS ARE APPROX. GENERAL NOTES: L IT IS THE INTENT OF THE ARCHITECT THAT THIS WORK BE 6NCOHFORIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS of THE BUILDING AUTHORITIES HAVIH^.s JURISDICTION OVER THIS TYPE OF CONSTRICTION AND OCCUPANCY. ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL DO THEIR WORK IN CCIFOR NONCE WITH ALL AR LIr-F" P CODES AND REGULATICNS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO COTTIE/ACING U1ORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS TO THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLYLOCATE AND BUILD INTO THE WORK ALL INSERTS, ANCHORS, ANGLES, PLATES, OPENINGS, SLEEVES, HANGERS, SLAB DEPRESSIONS AND PITCHES AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO ATTACH AND ACCOIMIODATE OTHER WORK 4. ALL DETAILS AND SECTIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO BE TYPICAL AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO APPLY TO ANY SIMILAR SITUATION ELSE LI ERE IN THE WORK PVYPPT W4ERE A DIFFERENT DETAIL IS 84-103111 5. THESE DOCUMENTS, AS NSTRPIENTS OF SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY NOT BE USED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT EXPRESSED PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE ARCHITECT. DESCRIPTION: AS -BUILT SURVEY OF A PORTION OF THE GULF STREAM GOLF CLUB CLUBHOUSE BEING IN &OVERNI"ENT LOT 3, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM POOCH COUNTY, FLORIDA UM FHI SITE CALCULATIONS TOTAL EXISTING GROIND FLOOR AREA UNDER ROOF 15,E54 Sip TOTAL EXISTING SECOND FLOOR AREA UNDER ROOF 13020 SAP EXISTING SECOND FLOOR OPEN TERRACE 2803 S/F TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA UNDER ROOF 2804 S/F VALVE ANOE ELY NOM COMM_ CotlTntCTO4 CONTROL LRE AA RECORDED N PLAT NOOK ITc PAGE MRA Re NOT LOCATED DV Tee Y EXISTING SITE PLAN WOOD DOOR Proposed Fabric Patio Awnitg CORAL [ATONE 401.41EAST —WYA2 TO LOCATE OVER IMRIC TANG CCMPULPEAD C4P d LAME4>r DRAEREID M PARED AT OTEM CAOCrTD Lo OVER OLD AErnc TANK WTM PUT PER NIANTELANCE WORKER C.C, Clef, BJW MY. MAO BSITVIDES MD ROM K0o6A MCA, FLOOR DRAM. ETC. row KAANENANCE YORKER In m RECE N APR 08 20 Town of Gulf Stre' 1,F 0; N Estl 0Y nl O FI z Y B z 4 a' 0 m U z Architect, Planner and Designer W�W AA -26002044 1045 East Atlantic Ave. Suite 303 Delray Beach, Florida 33483 TEL: 561-276-6011 FAX: 581-276-6129 ISSUED FOR DJLD6G FERMI BIDS PERMIT 4)es CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TIRE GULF 1 STREAM GOLF g CLUB 6 ADDITION / RENOVATION B) U LL z Q a 2401 N. OCEAN BLVD. GULF STREAM, FL. Q 1�1 CUBIT APPROVAL yIC k EXISTING SITE PLAN 01- (FOR REFER) 4 REVISIONS 11116 DRAM .Itlg FOR G.R OTRA101, 171116 DM CAM 166DC RRBRAI FEOHI Mb 011141 iMNMY PROW Iam FILE NUMBER 313A100E DRAWING TIRE DATE DRAWN BY 04.02.18 GE/MJ JOB NUMBER 20180313 DRAWING NUMBER A1.00E C:\Users\frankb\Engineering Express\Production - Documents\Clients\Delray Awning_2020 EngExp Border Master Template.dwg 01/20/2021 - 4:35pm DUOMDDII© h .a Posts 3" pipe f 14 ©At'n/aM®---/-A 1 0' SIDE VIEW �U U ROO AWNONQ FOR 1 11'-0" valance PIPE DESIGNATIONS 1/2" DIAM 3/4" DIAM 1" DIAM 1-1/4" DIAM 1-1/2" DIAM WALL THICK 0.109" 0.113" 0.133" 0.140" 0.145" OUTSIDE DIAM 0.840" 1.050" 1.315" 1.660" 1.900" INSIDE DIAM 0.622" 0.824" 1.049" 1.380" 1.610" ANCHOR SCHEDULE Awning Framework to be Attached To Existing Building Per. Structural Engineers Specifications GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SEVENTH EDITION (2020) AND ASCE 7-16 (MRH=15', EXP='C', Vult*=115MPH (3 SEC GUST), RISK CATEGORY I, 1.5:12 MIN. SLOPE, PITCHED/GABLE ROOF. THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE USED = 25 PSF. [*Vasa MAY BE CALCULATED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONVERSION: Vasd=Vult*I0.61 AS PERMITTED BY CODE, FABRIC COVERING SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN SUSTAINED WINDS REACH 75mph (90mph 3 -SECOND GUST). THE AWNING OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF THESE CONDITIONS BY THE PERMIT HOLDER. NO WARRANTY,EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. 2. FRAMES WITHOUT COVERING HAVE BEEN DESIGNED BY RATIONAL ANALYSIS TO WITHSTAND Vult=170mph (3 -SECOND GUST) WINDS IN EXPOSURES 'C' & 'D'. 3. ALL PIPE SHALL BE ASA SCHEDULE 40 OR GATORSHIELD 14 GAGE GALVANIZED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 5oksi YIELD & 55ksi TENSILE STRENGTH. 4. ALL WELDS SHALL COMPLY WITH A.W.S. CODE, CURRENT EDITION. ALL WELDS SHALL BE FULL LENGTH WITH 3/16" FILLET (U.N.O.), COVERED WITH ALUM PAINT. 5. FABRIC COVERING SHALL BE EXTERIOR, NON-METALLIC, NON -CORROSIVE, & WATER RESISTANT. FABRIC SELECTION IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS CERTIFICATION. 6. THE EXISTING HOST STRUCTURE MUST BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE LOADED SYSTEM AS VERIFIED BY THE PERMIT HOLDER. NO WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. 7. ENGINEERING EXPRESS HAS NOT VISITED THIS JOBSITE. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS BASED ON CONTRACTOR -SUPPLIED DATA & MEASUREMENTS. ENGINEERING EXPRESS SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE IN ANY WAY FOR ERRONEOUS OR INACCURATE DATA OR MEASUREMENTS. DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO ILLUSTRATE DESIGN FORCES AND OTHER DESIGN CRITERIA. THEY MAY VARY SLIGHTLY, BUT MUST REMAIN WITHIN THE LIMITATIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN. WORK SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEERING EXPRESS SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO RE-EVALUATE OUR WORK UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY INACCURATE INFORMATION PRIOR TO MODIFICATION OF EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS AND FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. . ENGINEER SEAL AFFIXED HERETO VALIDATES STRUCTURAL DESIGN AS SHOWN ONLY. USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR, et. al. INDEMNIFIES & SAVES HARMLESS THIS ENGINEER FOR ALL COST & DAMAGES INCLUDING LEGAL FEES & APPELLATE FEES RESULTING FROM MATERIAL FABRICATION, SYSTEM ERECTION, & CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES BEYOND THAT WHICH IS CALLED FOR BY LOCAL, STATE, & FEDERAL CODES & FROM DEVIATIONS OF THIS PLAN. . EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN, NO ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATIONS OR AFFIRMATIONS ARE INTENDED. FRANK BENNARDO, PE# 0046549 CAS 1120/2021 ALID FOR 1 PERMIT ONLY U.N.O DIGITAL SEAL NOTICE: IF THIS DOCUMENT IS DIGITALLY SIGNED, THIS SHEET IS PART OF A DIGITALLY SIGNED FILE. IT SHALL REMAIN IN DIGITAL FORMAT, SHALL BE VERIFIED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS, & PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED. PRINTED DOCUMENT NOTICE: IF THIS DOCUMENT IS PRINTED & DOES NOTCONTAIN AN ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE & SEAL, THIS DOCUMENT IS VOID & NOT VALID FOR USE. PHOTOCOPIES ARE NOT PERMITTED FOR USE. w I- 0 U 0 cc a w m z O U 0 z a co COPYRIGHT ENGINEERING SCALE: NTS UNLESS NOTED OF Town of Gulf Stre am T OWN OF GULF STRE AM, FL ORID A APPLIC ATI ON F OR DEVEL OPMENT APPR OV AL This fo rm is to be use d for all dev el opment r eview applic ation s to be he ard by the Town of G ulf Stream Architectural Revie w and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment and/or T own Commission. To c omplete th e form properly, please revie w the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction M anual for Applicati on for De ve lopment R ev iew Form. Failure to complet e this form prop erly will d elay its consid erati on. A RPB File # % / '2 -- PART ll. GENER AL INF ORMATI ON To be completed by all applicants. A. Project Information I_A .1. Projec t/Owner Name : 0D4 T. 344E5 \p by %. o�� Q i C vj1 ` 7 L. 3 3 I.A.2. Proje ct Addre ss: I.A. 3. Project Pro pe rty Legal Description: Thai", n `J ^V-ko?-5... � ¶2.. \---. IC3W-5 , V t e. LT -�p, .. 25t r LT (S A 0.4.55 to 20`8 .5 PY W. l$1.5"FTC'gr'ID �, il�-'(i I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc. ) ,$.'(3VILD b� tk2la5l c -Z DP SCi4-\Tz N-PG. Q2A1Si. Cpl TO MAln-1 Prz.VeM amv-x ► 1 V) PA) el 1) T1 -0d1)1 P C7, UPOAZ'E ... t.b TO 1.0 1. • I. A.5. Square Footage of Ne w Structure or Addition: S7 Architec tural style: &VL 5� �'Brzlz- NO I. A.6. Check all that apply: A rchitectural/Site Pla n Re viewNQrth Oce an Bouleva rd Ove rlay (comp/e se ction B) Demo litio n of Structures (co mplete s ectio ) Land Clearing (co plete sectio n D)/ Special Exception (complete sectio n E) Va riance (complete sectio n Gon-residential uses (complete Section F) I.A. 7. Proposed F. F. E: LD3 1'140 Type of Foundatio n: STWAL,N. Owner Information 1. 6. 1. Owner Address: 1.6.2. O wner Phone Number: 94 • 2rl(o' St) -2,-,(e Fax: 1.113. Owner Signa ture. C. Agent Information I.C.1. Age nt Name and Firm Name: 3 U70 . • Z "��► -- , i )1 a. 40 'BMA Q-M191� �-- I. C. 2. Agent Address: 1 334-6 i## 3 Cell 414•4t•Q>j21kFax Gbl-z51" I. C.3. Age nt Phone Number (o)6171:1 14.40349b-r n 30.‘c, (.&1)L.Ps 1 N\ 't . f (, )LL S AS 1L :33453 I:C.4. Agent Signature: Official Use Only Pre -App Date: ARPB Da te : App Date: Recommendation: Co m Date: TC Date: Decision: A pplicatio n for De ve lo pment Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Page 2 September 2004 T own of Gulf Stream P ART III. PR OJECT DESCRIPTI ON AND JUSTIFICATI ON To ic atio n e nce be Attach additi onal sheets only ftwhe n necelss ary and be sure with n be compl et ed by all applic ants sure to i nclude th eappr opri ateand complet e brie f. que stion number for e ach re spons e. A. Project Descriptio n a nd Justificatio n III. A. 1. In what zoning district is the project site located? (2+4) III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district ? e No rs l3 l �.fil�a i 1 (� ' 7 t�- 20 .. Svc. t Dian) ., Explain: �" � _ t� g l2. Pz . `� �tl(v1�O62.� � Cv �0�� SCR4GZ' (ifznDp 1 A SON r8114A eOtt.�, III.A.3. Is the pro ject co nsistent 'th the Futur e Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the C omprehensive Plan? es No Explain:TURPS— NZ), uS$- III. A. 4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? 0(0. LOT III.A. 5. How are the following utilities be ing provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage GIP _5 5� � b. Sanitary Sewer Gth�0�1 c. Potable wate r rDtO,0 of4 ent.n.v S t d. Irrigation Wa ter 4. OP. GOL-C e. Electricity f. Te lephone —O 4T g. G as PiN h. Cable Telev ision LAMa►" ase III. A.6. If the tent w ihthees cr terra inerection Section 66-144 ofmore the Towns of Gulf Stre am describe Code. (Attach additional consistent with sheet if ne cessa ry. ) 4-M14)"t PA RT IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMA TION Section A is to be completed by a ll applicants after pre -applicatio n confere nc e with Town sta ff. Answe ring "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Addition al Approvals/Requirements IV. A.1. Do es the project involve I d area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right-of-way? Yes No (If "Yes" , Section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structure s? No (If " Yes", Section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or the filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50% ) of the landscape area of a developed lot? Yes No (If "Y es" , Section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.4. Doe s the project require approval of a Special Exception? Ye s (If "Yes", Sectio n E of this part must be complete d. ) IV.A.5. Is the project at variance with a ny regulations contained in the Zoning Code? •s No (If "Yes", Section G of this part must be completed. ) Application fo r De ve lo pment Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 3 Septembe r 2004 Town of Gulf Stream B oje cts Requiri ng North Ocean B oulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. Wha .gnificant landscape features or architectural features ar e to be disturbed or added and to wh at extent? IV.B.2. Describe the need and tification for the disturbance/addition: IV. B.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroor seriously impair visual relationships am ong buildings, landscape features and open space, or int • • uce inc omp atibl e lands cape feat ures or pl ant mat erial that destroys or impairs significant views or vistwithin the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: IV.B. 4. How is the design co nsistent with the Al A Landscape Enhancement • oject? IV.B. 5. What mitigatio n is pro posed so that the disturbance/addition has the least impact • •ssible to the visual and ae sthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Ov erlay District: C. Proje cts Re quirin g a Demolition Permit IV. C.1. When are the existing structure s to be demolished? 'L}Z- ,� IV. C.2. When are the propo sed structure s to be construc te d? I M . VilN-) t--� ,U IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demo lished? p1 D. Projects Re qu iring a La nd Clearing Permit IV. D.1. Describe those vegeta tive materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: �11 IV. D.2. Describe the n eed and justification for the removal/relocation: Tt7 I l LL L.,oT' 42- T \i WIVE, IV. D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation�_tto be mitigated: ' 11-2-13C-2\91-11-. VEiKccukz -- IV.D. 4. How are the remaining and relocate d vege tative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV. D.5. What replace ment materials are proposed? cF1>-.130a-D Applicatio n for De velopment Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Pa ge 4 Septembe r 2004 T own of Gulf Stream Projects Requiring Special Exceptions IV. E. 1 Is the pr opos ed use a permitted Special E xception use? Yes No C ode Secti on: IV.E. 2. Ho is th e use desig ned, lo cated and prop os ed to be op erated so that the public health, saf ety, we lfa r- and morals will be protected? IV.E. 3. Will the use cause sub .ntial injury to th e value of other property in the neighb orhood where it is to be locate d? Yes No Explain: IV.E.4. How will the use be compatible with adjoin' • • development and the character of the District where it is to be located? IV.E. 5. What landscaping and scre ening are provided? IV_E.6. Does the use conform with all applicable re gulations governing the District wh e in it is to be l ocated? Yes No Explain: No n -Residential Projec ts of Greater than 2 Units IV.F.1. co mmo n area facilities are to be pro vided, desc ribe the m and how the y are to be ma intaine d: IV.F. 2. If recre ation facilities are to • - provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding Properties. IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provide d and their . ensions: Loa ding Spa ce s: Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spac es: Handicapped Pa rking Space s: Driveways/Aisles: Applica tio n for Dev elopme nt Approval, Fo rm ADA.32000 Page 5 September 2004 Town of Gulf Stre am (6) Will granting the variance pe rmit any prohibited use to be e stablished or re-established: Yes No (7) Is the re quested varia nce consiste nt with es goa ls, policie s, and obje ctives of the future Land Use Map . of the adopted Co mprehensive Plan? No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general de trimentaland to the public we lfa re? g CIr .v Smite 1� (9 v1,-F.S G. Proje cts R equiring a Varian ce (code Section 66-150 through 157)G"i't0--) 6 4. IV.G.1. Fr om what specific Z oning C ode regulation �1� Il on isvariance �ce requested? , 1f `0`9C-P FA -25) 'Lc -DV 5F3 (,7 -2-t 1 s P. 0% .71" 2-3` iz&.DTz- WR-n l2L � lD ` Ga z `� Kr -NA M� K IV .G .2. What does the Zoni ng C od e r equir e f or this sp ecific sit e? 3D4r-TC WiZQ IV. G.3. What is proposed? s� tS TI,�-X- 1444 IV. G.4. y� at is the total variance requested1 l 11 .5a.1•1 311/- r-6$An'" IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Section 66-154, must be addressed: (Attach additional sheet if necessa ry. ) (1) What specific conditio ns and circumstances lother a nds, stru ctur es, xist which are peculiar buildings ngs structure, thetrsam ebuilding ning involve d and which a re no t pp distric t? rr __ v 1 (�/A,�� (\� T-'► fq �12J`"'�"� V`'' 1 a"� �u fwiirip wl s..10N90)--a'-x-' :�,�SI� 42,i. -'1) IN (2) Did the special conditions and c ircumsta nces result from the actions of the applicant? Yes No (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Code to other lands,c�buildings, or structures in the sa me zoning district? Yes 1' '��� Expla in:��4ybnfl `�- 7> iSI LDLL.L - J J t6�'l )- 2,c-- s 1 -1-r C b") (4) How would wooulld a lite ra l in,154 te rpre tatio n of the provisions of�mZe zoning distant unde r nce de prive the applicant of the rights co mmo nly enjo yed by o the r properties in the ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? - (5) Is the Variance requeste :the minimum varianc e that make s possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure? No .�,� 1 Explain:i % 1?-+M4Sit.. 1 �L,DI-7' TO cJA � L2A an ce and n ot No be injurious to the are a invo lved or otherwise �� Explain: J� � � � � 1'a _i t U . 1 -1447 -t\ -P0131.61 S 111 V2-217. POCEPPat-r b.911- 4- ri -. 73-'1£ •.,)- 114- Pre- ei-ii-Ax4)7 Application for Development Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Se ptembe r 2004 Page 6 n of Gulf Stream H. Proje cts q uiri ng Rezo ni ng IV.H.1. What is th- uture L and Us e designation of the pr oject sit e? r IV.H.2. If the project in volv es a Re zonin., oning Code t ext change, Fut ur e Land Use Map change, Co mprehensive Plan text chang e, or : c ombination thereof, pleas e describe the need and justificatio n for the r equest. PART V. OPTION AL INFORMATI ON This en tire Part is optional for all applicants. Applicants are encouraged, but n ot required, to provide any a dditio na l relevant in fo rma tio n regarding the project that was n ot covered elsewher e on this form or on any of the o ther ma terials submitted with the application. Prig4M,Isio. D- Tv 193_. 2SIALAT1.6110 L uOZc912_190t5D d\ ),)p- o*F S [drz> Tb p: --rte t3`{ e ---%L' 1 L WI AV-11901. Applica tio n for Development Approva l, Form A DA.32000 Page 7 Septembe r 2004 TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 21-12 Address: 1060 No rth Ocean Blvd. Propo sed Improve ment: Own er: Joanne F. Hayes Agent: William Wietsma The applicant is seeking a Variance to permit construction of a new dwelling using the same footprint and setbacks as the existing building, which are the same setbacks as the existing neighboring structures. Approvals requested: Dem olition Permit to remove structures on the property to prepare f or new construction. Gross Lo t size: 6,200 sq. ft. Propo sed To tal Floor A rea: 2,647 sq. ft. Zoning District: RM-W Finished Floo r: +9.53 Variance to permit c onstruction of a new dwelling using the same footprint and setbacks of th e existing building, which are the same setbacks as the existing neighboring structures. Level III Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a 2,647 sq. ft . Gulf Stream Bermuda, single story dwelling, the finished floor elevation of which will be increased to 9.53 NAVD (an increase of 1.5 ft.) to match that of the neighbo ring dwellings, and an attached garage . Effective Lot Are a: 5,400 sq. ft. Allowable: N/A Height: 20 ft. Eav e Height: 10' 6" Issues Considered During Rev iew: Section 66-144 Standards: Regarding level 11 and level 111 architectural/site plan review Sectio n 66-150 Variances, et seq. Section 70-4 How to use this Manual Section 71-4 Site development regulations Discussion: The applicant is seeking relief from town code Section 71-4 which requires a minimum 15' side setback in the multi -family west zoning district. The structures on either side of the applicant's existing house are built at higher finished floor elevations. The applicant's intent is to build a new house utilizing the current side setbacks but at the same elevatio n as the structures on either side of his house. The applicant is requesting an 8' 1" variance from the 15 -foot requirement set forth above, placing the proposed structure 6' 11" from the property line, which is consistent with the existing house. Architectural Re view and Planning Board ARPB File #21-12 ARPB April 22, 2021 Page 2 The Gulf Stream Code sets forth procedures and standards for the ARPB and the Town Commission to review and approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications for variances. Variances are deviations from the terms of this Code that would not be c ontrary to the public interest when owing to special circumstances or conditi ons, or when the literal enforcement of the provisions of this Code wo uld result in undue and unnecessary hardship. When making a recommendation on this application for a variance, the ARPB must find that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. 2. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant . 3. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code to o ther lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. 4. Literal interpretation of the prov isions of this Code would deprive the applicant of rights c ommonly enjoyed by o ther pro perties in the same zo ning district under the terms of this Code and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. 5. The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure. 6. Granting the variance would not permit to be established or re-established any use prohibited in that zoning district. 7. Granting the variance is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies and future land use map of the adopted comprehensive plan. 8. Granting the v ariance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Code and that such variance will not be injurious to the area inv olv ed or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. These are the criteria the applicant is required to address. The ARPB shall hear, review and consider this application for a variance and reco mmend o ne of the following actions to the Town Co mmission: 1. Grant the application in full. 2. Deny the application in full. 3. Grant the application in part. 4. Grant a mo dification of the application in such form as the Town Commission deems proper and consistent with the variance standards. 5. Establish such conditions as the To wn Commission deems necessary to ensure co nformance with the variance standards. 6. Return the application to a recommending review autho rity or applicant with spe cific instructions as to additional info rmation, evidence, or testimony desired in order to make a de cisio n consistent with the variance standards. 7. Continue the consideration of the application to a time certain. Mo tions: Mo tio n to recommend approval/de nial of a variance from the provisions in Section 71-4 to allow an 8'1" modification to the side setbacks. Motio n to recommend approval/denial to permit the construction of a 2,647 sq. ft. Gulf Stream Bermuda, single story dwelling, the finished flo or elev atio n of which will be increased to 9. 53 NAVD (an increase of 1.5 ft.) to match that of the neighbo ring dwellings, and an attached garage. Architectural Review and Planning B oard ARPB File #21-12 ARPB April 22, 2021 ARPB Date: April 22, 2021 Action — Variance: Level 111 Architectural/Site Plan Review: Town Commission Date: May 14, 2021 Action — Variance: Level 111 Architectural/Site Plan Review: Page 3 B_V3aarh Tara L. 1N hittakt er 1120 Gulf Ocean Boulevard Gulf Stream, FL 33483 Dear members of the Architectural Review and Planning Board, I would like to express my opinion about the demolition and construction of a new Bermuda style home to be located at 1060 North Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, FL. Unfortunately, there was never any architectural style to the 4 houses built on the land from A1A to 1120 North Ocean Blvd. Basically track houses with with exterior cement walls which were made to look like brick. I think it would be a vast improvement to the neighborhood to demolish the house and build a new home, as per the plans on file with the town. I hope you will grant them a variance and feel it will enhance the area and give each one some individuality. Sincerely eak)boLA-0(- OJ,k)or---cx_b.t Barbara Whittaker April 9, 2021 Renee Basel From: AJ Lewis <ajlewismusc@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 5:32 PM To: Gregory Dunham Cc: Mike Hayes Subject: 1060 N Ocean [NOTICE: This message originated outside of the Town of Gulfstream -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Mr. Dunham - I wanted to express support for the proposed plans being reviewed at ARB 4/22 for 1060 N Ocean Blvd (next door to our home at 1040 N Ocean). I think it is a well designed plan which is in keeping with our neighborhood and town. I do not have any objections or concerns. Best, AJ Lewis 1 Renee Basel From: SUZANNE LEVIT <suzannelevit@me.com> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 9:42 PM To: Gregory Dunham Subject: 1060 north ocean boulevard [NOTICE: This message originated outside of the Town of Gulfstream -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] I am writing in support of the Hayes' construction plans at 1060 NOB. I am the next door neighbor at 1080 NOB and think the design is beautiful and am in full support of the variance they are seeking. Sincerely, Suzanne Devitt Levit 415-218-4298 (cell) Sent from my iPhone 1 ANNWiN 0111~ 'rsv�r GULF STREAM BUNGALOW CITY OF GULF STREAM , FL WILLIAM WIETSMA ARCHITECT PAPA Maps 3/11/2021 DOROTHYJACKS CFA,AAS Palm Beach County Property Appraiser We Value What You Value View Property Record Owners HAYES JOANNE F PAPA Home '> Property Detail Location 1060 N OCEAN BLVD Municipality GULF STREAM Parcel No. 20434609040040382 Subdivision PALM BEACH SHORE ACRES REV PL BLKS D & E Book 21603 Page 1369 Sale Date MAR -2007 3126 GULFSTREAM RD Mailing Address DELRAY BEACH FL 33483 7312 Use Type 0100 - SINGLE FAMILY Total Square Feet 2600 Sales Information Sales Date MAR -2007 JUL-2000 SEP-1999 JUL-1999 JUL-1994 12 557500 375000 10 350000 100 Appraisals Tax Year Price 2020 Beach County I https://maps.co.palm-beach.fl.us/cwgis/papa.html?gvalue=20434609040040382 54. 00' CO NCAVE PATV 68 N ENCLOSED P ATIO(L TIO �waD) Br a 1 STORY RESIDENCE FLOOR 60404 i�7. 0 A N 54. 00' LEGEND: E = CENTERLINE WAL = WATER AFTER PIA = FEE HYDRANT CV. = GATE VALVE 5 5441= SANIT ARY SEWER Awl -AXE C OE=CONCRETE A/C = C ON CRETE A/C PAD +805 = ELEVATI ON BA SED ON NORT H AM ERICAN VERTICAL DA7LM 1988 SOURC E L -PET D RS FETWYYUC ' FLOOD ZONE X COM MUNITY PAT E_ M7. 125X19 MAP MAD .: 12099C098F EFFECTIVE DATE OCTOBER 5 2017 NOT E ALL BCLNDARY LEES AND AA/GU AR Dd£N SVA D AVE PLAT AND SLRVEY ]NESS STATED OTIERWLSE ALL AN£A5OY5 SH OWN FE RE ON AVE BASED ON RE STADARD US FOOT. THS SURVEY HAS ACREVE13 A ANMLM LEVEL OF CLOS URE CF !FO OT RI V,,000 FEET AS RECYE0EO FOR C OMERCTAL/NDl TISK Pl i'FE RTY CLOSIFIE WAS AC HIEVED BASED ON A RED UNDANCY OF MEASUREMENTS F OR VERTICAL, HOFEZ OSTAL AND ANGULAR DA EASClSS NO SUBSURFAC E SEA RCH WAS AWE FOR WIRES OR U DE RG ROCAD FOO7ER5 DESCRIPTION TIE EAST 54 FEET OF RE WEST 262.5 F EET OF LOT 14A AND RE EAST 54 FEET OF RE WEST 262.5 FEET OF RE NORT H 25 FEET OF LOT 15A BLOCK a IEVISED FLAT CF BLOCK D AND BLOCK C PALM BEAC H S HOE ACR ES (OC EAN BOULEVARD E STATES AC CORDIN G TO TI E PLAT T HEREOF, AS RECO RD ED IV H AT B OO K 7, PACE 35 OF TI E PUBLIC RECORDS OF PAL M BEAC H C CUJTY, FLCRDA TO GETFER WIT H AN EAS U.ENT FO R IN GRESS AI D EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF RE NORTH 40 FE ET OF LOT 1SA . MAP OF AS —BUILT SURVEY SITE ADDRES S m60 N OCEA N 8LVD . GULF STREAM FLORIDA 33483 PARCEL LD. NO.: 20-43-46-09-04-004-0382 I WREST CERTIFY THAT INS 5L RVEY WAS WOE V EE R MI RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND MEETS TI E STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE ROOA BOAR) OF PROFESSIO NAL 5125EY065 AND MAPPERS N CHAPTER 51-T7. FLORIN ADHOKTRATIVE COY, HRSVA NT TO 5ECTON A72.02T. FL UR DA STATUTES PAUL D. E NGLE aAexrDiT AMLsr AM S UR VEYO R & MA PPE R #5708 MEWS, amLTOR ANB VIPPL C O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC . LAND SURVEYORS CE RTIFICATE OF A UTHORIZATIO N 78357 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE : PAIL 0. ENGLE 955 NW . 17TH AVENUE SLATE X -L DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33445 (561) 276-4501 732-3279 FAX 276-2390 DATEOF SAW MARCH 147 2021 RLO Row PAS. 0322 26 55SF f=XY ORDER Nn 20-49416 KITCHEN ID' -3' X 23'-2' REF II 1U OB TRAY ENGINEERED TOP POIVER i r 1 e� ELECTRC P PS ELECRIC WATER NEATER GARAGE HALLWAY 3 1 �\ t1 Yr Y '( 1 sI 1 sir p --- - - /' NIS MASTER \� HIS CLOSET I I 111-6' X 11-9. L___J OFFICE 12'-0" X W'-9' MILT N CLOSET TUBE %TIG HT NER CLOSET I9'-8' X 1'-9' STUCCO COIGNS OSLO AT FR ONT BUILDING CORERS, TIP. STOOTN STUCCO FINISH, BODY COLOR BNITE, TIP. RAISED STUCCO BAND, NT APPROX ECOAL5 TOP CF 01DOL SILL, COLOR UNITE, TIP, STEEL GAR AGE DOO F5 SITU 'AlEK' PVC TRIM IN 51FBLATED LOJVEFED PATTER, COLOR UNITE 1MP. ILE DR B ELOW DESK ON CASTERS FILE DR BELOA ROLL -COON PIIA4TOM TD CHIMNEY CAP COLOR-THRU FLAT CONC RETE TILE ROOF WIN MITERED HIPS AN D RDGES, COLOR UNITE , TOP . TO. TIE BEAM DECORATIVE CTPFESS O2TLCOKE RS , WTN PANT FINISH COLOR UNITE, TIP. RAISED STUCCO BA ND, COLOR U NITE. T OP. FRONT ENTRY GABLE NIPACT RESISTANT MA GNT IRON GLAZED DOERS W 014 SIDE LIIES, EV CLEAR LO -E GLASS, FRAME COLOR BLACK. TOP. PROJECT D ATA LEGAL D ESC RIPTI ON THE EAST 54 FRET a THE WEST 2625 FEET AS LOt 144 AND THE EAST 54 FEET CP TI E LEST 1615 FEET OF TIE NORM B FEET CF LOT 5A. BLWC D. REVISED PLAT R BLOCK D AND BLOCK E PAW 0E404 51050 ACRES IOCEAN ECULEVARD ESTATES/ , ACCOIAEG TO LIE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECC DFD N PLAT EOM 1 PAGE 36 . OF TI E FUBLK REC0R05 OF PA LM REACH COMP, FLORDA TO-ETIER WIN AN EAEEt91T FOR MEE%009 EGRESS OAR 11E EON 5 FEET [PIE 50540 FEET a L OT SA PA RCEL CO NTROL NUMBER 20- 43- 46-09-04-00d-0382 I-IWI CIPALTTY BOL A RATON FL OOD ZONE X GROSS LOT AREA 5, 400.0 S P. GOVER NING CODE O CCU PAN CY CLASSIFICATION 2020 FB C: RESIDENTIAL GR OU P R-3 (RESIDENTIAL) BUILDING SIZE TABULATION AREAS A/C LOGGI A SUM IC RCNEy GARA GE, ENTRY OVE RALL PRO POSED SIZE 1,984E S F. 6622 5F. 2641 .0 SF. (G ROSS SQUARE FEET) FLOO R A REA DIAGRAM (NOT TO SC ALE) (G^P A.F: 3633 5F . MIRED ENTRY: 4504 SF. REA R ELEVATION / DECORATIVE ALU M SHUTTER UV PO LDER -COAT FINISH COLOR BLACK. TYP. ALUTF UI CASEFENT. DECORATIVE OR FIXED, LLWDGW WTN CLEAR LO.E IMPACT RESISTANT SLAM, AND ELAM POIXER COAT FINISH, TTP. Cll . i I G.U. I L.r MAIN ELEC 050 00 ELECTRICAL METER SYMBOL LEGE ND j ENCLOSED (A/ C) ENCLO SED (NON -A/ C) CO VERED (NOR -A/C) HAYES RESIDENCE 0 >M W z 0 0� W zi �� V drown 5y: d esig ned 5y: WW . dote: 03/10/2021 pr oject GA®01 Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment and/or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File #•••1— I �� PART 11 GENERAL INFORMATION To be completed by all applicants. A. Project Information I.A.1. Project/Owner Name:ParCel 1: Thomas Smith 1122 N Ocean Blvd I.A.2. Project Address: Gulfstream F 3948-7 Parcel 2: Stephen Benjamin 1200 N Ocean Blvd I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: Parcel 1: GOLF COURSE ADDITION LT 9 Parcel 2. GOLF COURSE ADD LT 7 (LESS ELY 294.12 FT)e. LT 8 (LESS WLY 302.14 F7)8. 9-46-43, SLY 211.12 FT OF NLY 240.12 FT OF ELY 112.49 FT OF NE 1/4 LYG S OF & ADJ TO TR R P8115P173 & W OF & ADJ TO P810675 (LESS NLY 179.72 FT OF WLY 31.50 FT) & NLY 29 FT OF ELY 720.49 FT OF NE 1/4 LYG S OF 8 ADJ TO PB36P110 & TR R PB115P173 & W OF & ADJ TO PB10P75 I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.) Construction of new bulkhead landward of existing bulkhead. Construction of docks. boatlift and sitewalls to retain existing grades. I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: N/A Architectural style: N/A I.A.6. Check all that apply: Architectural/Site Plan Review North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) Demolition of Structures (complete section C) Land Clearing (complete section D) Special Exception (complete section E) Variance (complete section G) Non-residential uses (complete Section F) I.A.7. Proposed F.F.E: Type of Foundation: B. Owner Information I.B.1. Owner Address: Parcel 1: Thomas Smith 1122 N Ocean Blvd Gulfstream, FL 33483-7230 Phone: 561-276-7468 Parcel 2: Stephen Benjamin 1200 N Ocean Blvd Gulfstream, FL 33483-7230 Phone: 252-617-1129 1.6.2. Owner Phone Number: I.B.3. Owner Signature: C. Agent Information I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: Schulke, Kittle & Stoddard, LLC I.C.2. Agent Address: 1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 201 Vero Reach Fl 42060 772-770-9622 fl !1 Ce11772-473-8818 I.C.3. Agent Phone Number (0) I.C.4. Agent Signature: UVilk-), Fax: Fax 772-770-9496 Official Use Only Pre -App Date: ARPB Date: Recommendation: TC Date: App Date: Com Date: Decision: Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 September 2004 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre -application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? RS -0 III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district ? 1172.No Explain: III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? QM No Explain: III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? Existing III.A.5. How are the following utilities being provided to the property? N/A - Existing a. Stormwater Drainage b. Sanitary Sewer c. Potable water d. Irrigation Water e. Electricity f. Telephone g. Gas h. Cable Television III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66-144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) N/A PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre -application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals/Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right-of-way? Yes ®o (If "Yes", Section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? es No (If "Yes", Section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or the filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50%) of the landscape area of a developed lot? Yes No (If "Yes", Section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.4. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? Yes ®° (If "Yes", Section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? Yes ®° (If "Yes", Section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 3 September 2004 Town of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit N/A IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance/addition: IV.B.3. Will the disturbance/addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the A1A Landscape Enhancement Project? IV.B.5. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance/addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? May 2021 IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? May to July 2021 IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? N/A D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit N/A IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal/relocation: IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 September 2004 TOWN OF GULF STRE AM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 21-5 Address: 1200 NOB & 1122 NOB Proposed Improvement: Appro va ls Requested: Level III Architectural/Site Plan: Gro ss Lot size: N/A Proposed Total Floor Area: N/A Owners: St ephen & Helen Benjamin and Thomas & Bettin a Smith Agent: Schulke, Bittle & St oddard, LLC The applicant is seeking a Level III Architectural/Site Plan Review & a Demoliti on Permit to c onstruct the following: A. The c onstruction of a new bulkhe ad landw ard of the existing bulkhead. B. The c onstruction of d ocks and a boatlift . C. The c onstruction of new site w alls to ret ain existing grades . A Level III Architectural/Site Plan Review & D emo lition Permit to construct the f oll owing: A. The construction of a new bulkhead landw ard of the existing bulkhead. B. The co nstructio n of docks and a bo atlift. C. The construction of ne w site walls to retain existing grades. Effective Lot Are a: N/A Allo wable: N/ A Zoning District: RS -Ocean West District Height: N/ A Finished Floor: N/ A Eave Height: N/ A Issues Considered During Re vie w: Section 66-144 Standards: Rega rding Level III architectura l/ site plan review Sectio n 66-369: Do cks NOTES: 1. This application seeks to increase the submerged lands fo r each pro perty, resulting in a remodeled waterfront footprint and new canal access for 1122 North Ocean Boule vard. 2. In response to comments ma de by the public at the last ARPB meeting, the a pplicant has submitted documents with more detail and renderings that reflect the new, proposed landsca ping. Mo tion: Mo tio n to reco mmend appro val of a D emolition Permit and a Leve l III Architectural/Site Pla n based on a finding that the co nstruction of a new bulkhead la ndward of the ex isting bulkhea d, the co nstructio n of two docks and a boatlift a nd the construction of new site walls to retain A rchitectural Review and Planning Bo ard ARPB File #21-5 ARPB: March 25, 2021 Page 2 existing grades meets the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. ARPB Date: February 25, 2021 Actio n - Postponed to the March 25, 2021 A RPB meeting AR PB Date: March 25, 2021 Action - Postponed to the A pri122, 2021 A RPB meeting ARPB Date: April 22, 2021 Actio n - PAGE 1 Or 1 N SCALE:1,30' 4.94 sn ea 4001/2' 450 1.1 Tree ID Common Name Scientific Name DBH Ht (Ft) Spread (Ft) Condition (%) Observations 1 Royal Poinciana Delonixregia 9 18 20 60 Poor Structure; Uneven Crown 2 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 12 20 10 70 3 Strangler Fig Ficus aurea 111 66 64 50 Poor structure; Decay -branches 4 Japanese Fern Tre, Filicium decipiens 5 11 10 60 5 Japanese Fern Tre, Filicium decipiens 5 11 10 60 6 Japanese Fern Tre Fificium decipiens 5 11 10 60 7 Japanese Fern Trei Filicium decipiens 5 11 10 60 8 African Tulip Tree spathodea campanulata 15 20 18 60 Wound in stem 9 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 10 25 10 70 10 Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto 12 25 10 70 11 Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto 12 20 10 70 12 Frangipani Plumeria sp. 10 20 20 60 Poor location; Poor structure 13 Council Tree Ficus altissima 54 45 35 35 Heading cuts; Uneven crown 14 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 12 35 12 60 15 Mastic Sideroxylonfoetidissimur 28 30 21 45 16 Pigeon Plum Coccoloba diversifolia 9 30 15 65 17 Sabal Palm Saba! palmetto 12 12 10 70 18 Tropical Almond Terminalia catappa 40 50 50 35 Lean; Poor strucure 19 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 10 26 10 65 20 Tropical Almond Terminalia catappa 50 65 50 45 Poor structure 21 Saba! Palm Sabalpalmetto 13 22 12 70 22 Montgomery Palm Veitchia montgomeryanc 8 28 12 45 23 Christmas Palm Adonidia merrillii 6 30 12 65 24 Tropical Almond Terminalia catappa 40 40 15 25 Storm damage; Decay in stern 25 Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto 12 6 10 65 26 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 11 28 12 65 27 Sabal Palm Sobalpalmetto 13 10 12 70 28 Tropical Almond Terminalia catappa 60 50 50 45 Lean; Storm damage 29 Indian Laurel Ficus nitida 40 40 30 40 30 Weeping Fig Ficus benjamina 24 40 30 40 Decay in stem 31 Gumbo Limbo Bursera simarubo 8 24 12 45 32 Pigeon Plum Coccoloba diversifolia 8 20 10 60 33 Strangler Fig Ficus aurea 34 25 20 55 34 Mastic Sideroxylonfoetidissimur 12 25 20 40 Decay in stern 35 Mastic Sideroxylonfoetidissimur 14 25 15 40 Poor structure 36 Indian Laurel Ficus nitida 16 25 15 40 Lean 37 Indian Laurel Ficus nitida 12 35 15 45 38 Satin Leaf Chrysophylium oliviforme 14 35 20 50 Multiple stems (3) 39 Satin Leaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme 10 30 20 35 Multiple stems (2); Storm damage 40 Satin Leaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme 14 35 20 30 Rengenerated stump 41 Mastic Sideroxylonfoetidissimur 8 40 20 60 42 Chinese Fan Palm Livistonia chinensis 24 8 18 70 Multiple stems (3) 43 Council Tree Ficus altissimo 115 40 15 60 Dead Branches >2 inches 44 Thatch Palm Thrinax radiata 5 22 6 70 45 Thatch Palm Thrinax radiata 7 30 8 70 46 Thatch Palm Thrinax radiata 5 18 6 65 47 Thatch Palm Thrinaxradiata 4 22 6 60 48 Thatch Palm Thrinax radiata 4 12 6 70 49 Thatch Palm Thrinax radiata 5 25 6 65 50 Kopsia Ochrosiaelliptica 15 18 16 40 51 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 11 20 12 70 52 Saba! Palm Sabalpalmetto 12 12 12 65 53 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 12 20 12 70 54 Senegal Date Palm Phoenix reclinata 8 20 15 70 55 Coconut Palm Cocosnucfera 9 20 15 60 56 Senegal Date Palm Phoenix reclinata 18 12 20 50 57 Coconut Palm Cocosnucifero 8 25 20 65 58 Strangler Fig Ficus aurea 73 35 40 40 Heading cuts; Wound on stem 59 Coconut Palm Cocosnucifero 8 30 20 70 A FORT 30 ON OF 5ECT TOW NSA �Y SJRVY ON 9. TOWN5I-'irj 43 50UTI1, RANGE 43 OF GULF5TREAM, FLORIDA UMW= 0r 1010.1, 465 RA.74043E 0201 0D50 0.,,, O nom O 0 210.W ° 19 ro rumIll 4003. 1 26 O O 2, O 21 mRNATU2t flats. 9 O. 130 J. 0 141.12 e 00 n A5T Mt TAM 510119 135.00 9ITA 13.2.42 16!71 31.42 0.00 CI 3150 N2.3.1859`. 061.2 1122 5055133W 4 ID 4.57 1633' 1].74' 934 639 HIDDEN HARBOUR DRIVE ui wweAY 24 O. 090 50 Mckly Al TER-\ MOON Of YL10X9 nIM@Ie 465 RAXR 432 2.050 01% 70/90/ o '307 4.50 76 0 71 93 0 1.30 0 ° 300 X743' 114.10 0 ]3 20.90 NRIION a o<] 72 0 maulcrl X6.]9 00 99 s-� 7153X4 3.11' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DEiCPJPOON:PARCEL A (FEE SIMPIETTHAT PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 46 50URI, RANGE 43 EAST, TOWN OF GULF 51REAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 8E162 A 2ART OF LOTS 7 AND B, GOLF COURSE ADD11ON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF A5 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR 10. PAGE 75 OF THE PUBLIC RECORD5 OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA AND APART OF SAID SECTION 9, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCE AT 112 NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOLD TOT 7, GOLF COURSE ADDITION; THENCE MST (ASSUMED) ALONG THE NORM LINE OF SAID LOT 7,294,12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE MST, ALONG SAID NORM UNE, 326.13 FEET TO 1112 NORTHWEST CORNER Of SAID LOT 7; THENCE CONTINUE WEST, ALONG THE WESTERLY PROIONGAION OF111E SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 7, 720.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH, 29.00 FEE TO A POINT IN THE 5001118E OF 30 FOOT ROAD EASEMENT A5 RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 1094, PAGE 189, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH 200N10, FLORIDA; THENCE EAST, ALONG TH2 50UT11 UNE OF SAID ROAD EASEMENT, 608.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 135.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13'2202'; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG1115 ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF ROAD EASEMENT, 31.50 FEET; THENCE 500TH, 179.72 FEET; THENCE WEST, 25.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH, 33.58 FEET TO THE NORTH FACE OF A CONCRETE BULKHEAD; THENCE 501111189'5041 ' EAST, ALONG THE SAID NORTH FACE OF SAID CONCRETE BULKHEAD AND THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, 8 2.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE OUST UNE Of SAID LOT 8, GOLF COURSE ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH 5'51'39' WEST, ALONG SAO WEST UNE, 11.22 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 5ND LOT 8; THENCE FA5T, ALONG THE SOUTH UNE STUD LOT 8.45 MEASURED 41086111E5ND SOUTH UNE OF LOTB;TIENCE NORTH 10°41'17' 5457, 254.44 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF B 812442NG.5N2 LAND LYING AND SITUATE IN 111E TOVM OF GULF 5162414, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINS 114,682 SQUARE FEET AND/OR 2.63ACRES, MORE OF 1I55.PAR6EL (EASEMENT)85 EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, AND FOR MAINTENANCE, CREATED 8Y THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT DEED RECORDED ON APRIL 23, 1986, IN OFFLOAL RECORDS 500K 4856, PAGE 147, OVER ON AND ACROSS TIE POLLO461NG DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY:THAT PART OF LOT 7, GOLF COURSE ADDITION, TOW! OF GULF STREAM, PALM 82401 COUNTY, FLORIDA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF A5 RECORDED IN PLAT 10, PAGE 75. Of THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM 624016OUN111, FLOR1DA DESCRIBED A5 FIX10WS:C0MMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER 02 SAID LOT 7; THENCE WEST (ASSUMED), ALONG THE NORTH UNE Of SAID LOT 7, 254.12 FEET TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING ; THENCE CONTINUE MST, ALONG SAID NORM UNE, 40.00 FEET; THENCE SOWN 1041'1 T WEST, 40.00 PYET; TH8CEEA5T25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°41'55'545T, 45.25 FEET TOP -12541D POINT OF BEGINNING .5ND LAND LHNG AND SITUATE IN THE TOVM OF GUIFSTREAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND COONS 1,278 SQUARE FEET AND,OR 0,03ACRES, MORE Of 1E55. PROPERLY ADDRESS: 1200 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD GULF STREAM, FL 33483 INVOICE NUMBER: 103025-5E DATE OF FIELD WORK: 08119/2020 CERTIFIED TO STEVE BENJAMIN FLOOD ZONE: FLOOD MAP: 120990 PANEL: 0981 SUFFIX: 2 PANEL DATE: 1005/2017 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION 0R DEPTH: WA NAVD 1988 COIAMUNITY NUMBER: 125109 BENO/M8RK:2315 E0EVATI0N:20.20 TNISHED FLOOR ELEVATION: 18.15 NAVD 1988 DOM. .159,9u 55'574 '1 r2215.5f 7.02 13.02 12.00 2050 20.20 012 eP 1.50 1572 7 O. 12 ID 0 555450 20.50 11.50 coon mic - 2340 858150,6 40 0.50 0 43.50 16.30 s$o r: 8 X6024081200 -1 36 30 ruww 42.03 X1192 3 0 51 000 a 49 11.2 0 35 15. 0 050 1039 0060 XM21 of 2 X1016 ?OM Of 7Ara,•A• 74541,X6 rOXlm Irz. PAW,,. 3e W Xa WO rJ n 0020 71.61' 10.16 X 1'g 40 y11.02 SDA 5,1015.50 �.>C 8 odg 612 1203' aQ w °G1 y 62 2.m 201 a.m WIN CAP /5633 7a4noaor LOY7 Nrn..1013r, wawNou: w I. 5. NOT KUM, 1155 302.14' COMM of MLA f TREE ID COMMON NAME 60 Pink Tab Tabebuia heterophylla 13 15 15 35 Heading cuts; codominant stem 61 Paradise Tree Simaroubo g/auco 26 25 33 45 Storm damage 62 Sea Grape Coccoloba uvifero 50 35 24 25 63 Sea Grape Coccoloba uvifera 27 30 15 35 Heading cuts 64 Weeping Fig Ficus benjomina 56 25 30 45 Heading cuts 65 Foxtail Palm Wodyetiobifurcota 9 27 18 70 66 Foxtail Palm Wodyetia bifurcata 9 30 18 70 67 Weeping Fig Ficus benjominu 54 35 40 45 Heading cuts 68 Weeping Fig Ficusbenjomino 70 30 30 35 Heading cuts 69 Screw Pine Pondanus util/s 66 15 24 40 70 Star Fruit Averrhoa carambola 12 18 15 45 71 Council Tree Ficus altissima 115 50 60 50 Wounds on stems 72 Indian Laurel Ficus nitida 46 40 20 40 Decay in stem 73 Council Tree Ficus altissima 99 30 45 35 Decay in stem 74 Mango Mangifera indica 6 11 8 60 75 Sabal Palm Sabot palmetto 14 35 12 70 76 Tropical Almond Terminalia catappa 25 45 30 40 Low live crown ratio; Storm damage 77 Indian Laurel Ficus nitida 60 55 60 50 0ne sided crown; Conflict with seawall 78 Council Tree Ficus altissima 77 50 45 40 Excessive sprouts; Heading cuts; Poor taper 79 Coconut Palm Cocos nucifera 10 20 20 70 80 Coconut Palm Cocos nucifera 9 20 20 70 81 Christmas Palm Adonidia merrillii 14 10 15 60 Multiple stems(3) 82 Christmas Palm Adonidia merrillii 10 10 15 70 Multiple sterns (2) 83 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 14 20 10 70 84 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 11 20 10 70 85 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 10 20 10 65 86 Sabal Palm Sabalpalmetto 8 20 10 65 87 Tulipwood Harpulliapendula 21 25 15 15 Lean; Decay in stem 88 Thatch Palm Thrinaxradioto 6 6 9 60 89 Thatch Palm Thrinaxradiata 6 24 12 70 90 Solitiare Palm Ptychosperma elegans 7 30 12 60 Multiple stems (2) 91 Solitiare Palm Ptychosperma elegans 4 18 9 65 92 Solitiare Palm Ptychosperma elegans 7 12 9 65 Multiple stems (2) 93 Mastic Sideroxylonfoetidissimur 22 35 30 45 Lean 94 Wild Lime Zonihoxylumfagaro 8 20 18 60 95 Satin Leaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme 7 25 12 25 50ENITFIC NAME LOT, 001 HT (F¶ SPREAD (FN CONDITON(9N OB5ERVAl10N5 5012,.X50 AmE551. BEARING REFERENCE: We 02 u1T1X[aw20A3 xmmmw.A5l xsuu tlraXxnaCA.C6mPON u3MAxwsaaAx Ix78e1®TIBEIO eAPID•A•NOE Xf 0510102 LOT PLA77E0 EASEMENTS, NOTABLE OR ADVERSE CONDITIONS (UNPLATTED EASEMENTS ALSOLISTED IF PROVIDED BY CLIENT): !F APPLI^.ABLE, RECIPIENTS OF THIS SIURVE7 SHOULD REVIEW THE FOSIT/ON OF A4'1' FENCE LINES SHOWN HEREON ANO THEIR 001.2 10135710 711 THE BOUNDARY LINE IMPORTANT NOTE: O EcE. 11.116. rXa•AXXn GOP -111E IMwerylrlen W0 by rtNe SrwAN0104 D. me mcFrol OF TME 481 E. Hillsboro Blvd. Ste 100-A .. Deerfie d Be* FL 33441 x14340 7544830 R,,_ 0809868.46 w4o,�6 ro °":f1n'°°i'e«;•' Office: (561)367.3587 Fax: (561) 465.3145 0/548 3: AP. Res. ExExlnaNa.XXEIaAAw4aTEolA994X4EAXo ,.....,Is„H1einc4,,,,e„rvXm O r4 FENCE 0.2' OUT 4.08 FENCE 0 3' OUT 1- 1 k X 1 1 1 82 81 1 PROPERTY CORNER FALLS 1 IN WATER PROPERTY CORNER FALLS* IN WATER 4.15'0 I WALL e ' N UNE 4.25'5 1 — CORNER NOT ACCESSIBLE 0 x 4.00' 77 4.80' U E 78 76 CORNER NOT ' ACCESSIBLE d 141.10 140.04' 0.82' 7.02' x RNER NOT ACCE55IBLE 7 8.65 175 / \ X 17.50' 13,02' 16.30' "W-" MAX. NOTE: BARRIER TO BE CONTINUOUS AROUND THE TREE OR GROUP OF TREES. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF TREES TO REMAIN. IN NO CASE SHALL THE FENCE BE INSTALLED LESS THAN TEN FEET FROM THE TRUNK - 5- — — — TREE OR PALM TREE" PALM PROTECTION BARRIERS TO EXTEND BEYOND TIEORIPLINE OR TO TIE 'CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OFALL TREES/PALMS TO BE PROTECTED WENS WHERE NECESSARY TO PROTECT TREE CANOPY ROOTS. RED RIBBON TIED TO TOP OF FENCE, MIN. 5' OC. INGROLND METAL POSTS ATS• SPACING, OR OF 2X4'POSTS AITH THREEEOLULLY SPACED 2X4' RAILS NINA MINMUM OF 4' HT SAFETY BARRIER FENCE. 6-X 6' X6' 1MRE MESH ATTACHED TO EACH POST OTREE PROTECTION DETAIL ELEVATION SCALE: N.TS. 0, 74.61' 64 1 1 .55' 00 0.60' I i 1 CORNER NOT ACCESSIBLE ° x i I 16 7 / I 32' SCALE'. 1116' = 1T 0" TREE DISPOSITION (See Tree Inventory List on Survey for all other trees and palms existing to remain) Tree Number Common Name Botanical Name DBH (Inches) Height (FT) Canopy (FT) Disposition Condition 19 Sabal Palmetto Sabal Palm 10" 26' 10' Relocate 65% 75 Sabal Palmetto Sabal Palm 14" 35' 12' Relocate 70% 76 Tropical Almond Terminalia catalpa 25" 45' 30' Remove 40% 77 Indian Laurel Ficus natida 60" 55' 60' Remove 50% 78 Council Tree Ficus altissima 7T' 50' 45' Remove 40% 81 Adonidia menillii Christmas Palm 14" 10' 15' Relocate 60% 82 Adonidia merrillii Christmas Palm 10" 10' 15' Relocate 70% PLANT SYMBOLS EXISTING TO REMAIN EXISTING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TO BE RELOCATED TREES 0 PALMS \ I / —•— /1\ U AQiZ V 20 WP. Mx?, U20 CO a LO U5 REVISIONS'. Na Dole .salpton SEAL: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Cnnstep. CSAans REGISTRATION!. RIASE.67347 SHEET TITLE: TREE DISPOSITION Scala. 1/16T = 1 • - 0" Drawn By: CC Checked By: CC Date: 04/1442021 SHEET NUMBER: LR-1 80 NE 5TH AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 561 596 6771 1 chriscabezas@gmail. com w wwc h ri s ca bez a s l a n d s ca pe. co m 0 TR 0 n _ w rl 20 w 0 a FENCE 0.2' OUT 4.OB' PROPERTY CORNER FALLS N WATER PROPERTY CORNER FALLS. IN WATER WALL ON LINE CORNER NOT z ACCESSIBLE 1 0 SITE LOCATION MAP CER 1 SPA RELO #75 i MFR 4.15'X OD MFR X 4.00' �i. 140.04' 141 I FR OPEN LAWN AREA WATERFRONT EXPANSION AREA (SEE ENGINEERING PLANS) 4.50 O 4.25'x 0 -. -_ CORNER NOT I ACCESSIBLE d RNER NOT C CESSIBLS 6.52 X 7.02' EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN X TRA CNU CNU CNU 2 PLANT SCHEDULE OPEN LAWN AREA RRE RRE . RRE 17.50' RRE RRE BSI TREES OTY Scientific Name Common Name Specs Native Tongrhtit Notes BS1 2 Bursas s maruba Gumbo Limbo 16' HT Min.. 4 CAL Min. v ♦ Standard COD 6 000:omba Oivers4053 Pigeon Rum 12' HT v 4 51an0ar0 CER 1 000004,005 erectu0 Greer Buttonwood 12' HT V a Standard MFR 4 Myrcpentaes tragiens Snnpson's Stopper 8-10 HT. MA -trunk v Mull,Trure PALMS OTT Scientific Name Common Name Spew Native TOk am Notes CNU 3 Cares nocifera Coconut Palm 'Green Malayan' 20' CT v WM Character RRE 6 Roystonea rages Royal Palen 15'GW Lfin. N 4 SPA 5 Sabel Palmetto Sabel Palm 15-25' HT. 12' 01314 Mm. a V Vaned 8 jtts SR 14 Serena repents Gnerea' Silver Saw Palmetto 15 Galon, Full v 4 TRA 4 Thnnan raoiata Ronda Thatch Palm D5' CT v V 020. I i 74 6C 0.60' SPA SPA SPA I SPA SPA BSI CORNER NOT I x I I NOTE. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS IN WORKING ORuER55 50 0 8' 10 32' AND SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO PROPERLY WATER ANY NEW PLANTINGS WITH 100% COVERAGE. SCALE. 1/167=1.-0' RELOCATED PALMS OTY Scientific Name Common Name Specs Native Drought Tolerant Notes AMP/4 2 Adonidie merriliir Christmas Palm See Tree Disposition Sheet J SPA## 2 Sabel Palmetto 5aba1 Palm See Tree Deposition Sheet v V SHRUBS CITY Scientific Name Common Name Specs Native Drought Tolerant Notes AG 450 Arachis glabrata Perennial Peanut 1 Gallon, Full 12' O.C. Al 5 Alcanlarea Impanel. Same 7 Gallon, Full J AO 9 Alcantarea odoraia Same 7 Gallon, Full 4 CC 25 Capparls cynophallophora Jamaican Caper 15 Gallon. 4-5' HT Full to Bottom CH 40 Chrysobalanus taco 'Horizontal' Horizontal' Cocoplum 7 Galleon. Full 4 J 30" 0 C CG 120 Clusia guttffera Small Leaf Clusa 15 Gallon, 5-6' HT r 30" O.C. EL 250 6,0000, 11110,01 s Golden Beach Creeper 1 Gallon NO 155 Nephrolepis obliterate Kimberly Queen Fern 3 Galleon. Full J 24'0.C. PN 28 Psychotria nervosa Wild Coffee 7 Gallon. 2-3' HT 1 a Full to 80110111 0 PLANT SYMBOLS EXISTING EXISTING TREE ,. EXISTING PALM PROPOSED' TREE PROPOSED F/' SHRUBS PALM SHRUB 1 ACCENT PLANT r REVISIONS. Ha [Me Oesenp. SEALDSCAPE AecaneCT Christopher Le bens REGISTRATION NO 1i, 6667347 SHEET TITLE. LANDSCAPE PLAN XXX Sale. 1/16"=1'-D' Drawn By: CC Checked By: CC Date, 04114/2021 SHEET NUMBER. LP -1 L 1 1 b S e a r e a s 51 1 1 11111111111 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 r- (7); m m r m O z z m W c r 2 m D 0 m m z 0 O N 0 m z 0) m n m m z SNOIlIONOO ONIlSIX'D z O 2 m r O O CD PRO JECT: 1200 NO RTH OCEAN BLVD. GULF STREAM, FL 33483 LANDSCAPE PERMIT DRAWINGS CLIENT: STEPHEN BENJAMIN CHRIS CABEZAS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. 80 NE 5TH AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 561.596.6771 1 chriscabezas@gmail. com w ww.ch riscabezasla ndscape. co m vS GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS 3" MULCH ( NO RED) 4" CONTINUOUS SOIL SAUCER RIM SPECIFIED PLANTING MIXTURE EXISTING SOIL OR APPROVED BACKFILL 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP TOE NAIL BRACES TO BATTENS DO NOT NAIL BATTENS TO PALM 5 P.T. WOOD BATTENS @2"x4"x16" STEEL BANDS 3 BRACES @ 4" x 4" FOR ROYAL AND CHARACTER PALMS. 3 BRACES @ 2" x 4" FOR SMALL PALMS. 3 STAKES @ 2" x 4" x 24" - TOP OF STAKE 6" ABOVE GRADE 2" x 4" STAKES PAD BURIED 3" BELOW GRADE. MOUND AND COMPACT SOIL NO LESS THAN 12", ADJUST HEIGHT TO PLACE TOP OF ROOT BALL EVEN WITH GRADE, (REFER TO GRADING PLAN). OPALM PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL SCALE: N/A LOCATE PLANTS WITH EQUAL SPACING OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING LEGEND. PAVING, CURB, BUILDING, HEADER OR OTHER FIXED EDGE SHOWING PLANTING AREA LIMIT. ON CENTER SPACING SHRUB SPACING °PLANT & SHRUB SPACING DETAIL SCALE N/A NOTE: SECURE BATTENS WITH 2-3/4" HI CARBON STEEL BANDS TO HOLD BATTENS IN PLACE DURING PLANTING PROCESS. DO NOT NAIL BATTENS TO PALM. THE HEIGHT OF BATTENS SHALL BE LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE HEIGHT OF THE PALM FOR ADEQUATE BRACING. TRIANGULAR PLANT SPACING CHART FOR GROUNDCOVERS AND PERENNIALS ROW A 18" 0.C. 24" 0.C. 36" 0.C. 15" 0.C. 21" 0.C. 31" O.C. GROUNDCOVER 8 PERENNIAL SPACING 3" MULCH (NO RED) 4" CONTINUOUS SOIL SAUCER RIM SPECIFIED PLANTING MIXTURE EXISTING SOIL OR APPROVED BACKFILL NOTE: GUY-WRE TO HAVE PROTECTIVE RUBBER SLEEVE WHEN IN CONTACT WTH PLANT MATERIAL. LOCATE BLACK GUY -WIRE ABOVE FIRST BRANCH ADJUSTABLE SLIP KNOT SAFETY BLACK GUYING LINE -FASTING TO STAKE 3 STAKES @2"x4"x24" TOP OF STAKE 6" ABOVE GRADE MOUND AND COMPACT SOIL NO LESS THAN 12", ADJUST HEIGHT TO PLACE TOP OF ROOT BALL EVEN WTH GRADE OUNDERSTORY TREE PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL SCALE N/A °SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE N/A LOOSEN 8 SCORE BOUND ROOTS REMOVE POT AND RECYCLE 3" MULCH (NO RED) 3" CONTINUOUS SOIL SAUCER RIM EXISTING SOIL OR APPROVED BACKFILL SPECIFIED PLANTING MIXTURE MOUND AND COMPACT SOIL NO LESS THAN 6", ADJUST HEIGHT TO PLACE TOP OF ROOT BALL EVEN WTH GRADE 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BECOME 17. FAMILIAR WITH THE SCOPE OF WORK AS WELL AS THE SITE, DIGGING CONDITIONS, AND ANY OBSTACLES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHOULD VERIFY ALL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF MATERIAL SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. 3. PLANT LIST SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANTING PLAN IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES. 19. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SYMBOLS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE CONSIDERED DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOULD BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD BY LANDSCAPE 20. CONTRACTOR TO AVOID ALL UTILITIES AND ALL OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. ALL EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL TO REMAIN, SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY PLANT MATERIAL SCARRED OR DESTROYED DESIGNATED TO REMAIN MUST BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE WITH SIMILAR SPECIES SIZE AND QUALITY. 18. ALL TREES AND ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE TOPPED WITH 3" MIN. "GRADE A" ORGANIC MULCH (MELALEUCA IS PREFERRED), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. (CYPRESS MULCH AND RED MULCH SHALL NOT BE USED). 5. ALL SIZES SPECIFIED FOR PLANT MATERIAL 21. ON THE PLAN AND PLANT LIST SHALL BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH HEIGHT AND SPREAD. 7. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. . 8. ALL TREES, PALMS, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS FROM DATE OF Fl NAL ACCEPTANCE. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES PRIOR TO DIGGING. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, THE REMOVAL OF ALL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND FOREIGN MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL. 11. SITE PREPARATION SHOULD INCLUDE THE ERADICATION AND REMOVAL OF ANY WEEDS OR GRASS, REMOVAL AND CLEAN UP OF ANY DEAD MATERIAL AND ROUGH AND FINISH GRADING PER SPECS AND OR LANDSCAPE PLANS. 12. FOR PLANT MATERIAL DESIGNATED TO BE REMOVED, THE ENTIRE ROOT SYSTEM SHALL BE DUG AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 13. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHOULD RECEIVE AN 80/20 MIX FILL SOIL. SAND USED IN PLANTING SOIL MIX SHALL BE SILICA SAND. 14 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS SET FORTH IN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 'GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS" SECOND EDITION FEB. 1998 INCLUDING REVISIONS AND WHICH MEET OR EXCEED THE SIZES INDICATED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE AND DETAILS. 15. ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED IN AGOOD WORKMANLIKE MANNER. NO NAIL STAKING PERMITTED. (REFER TO BRACING NOTES AND PLANTING DETAILS) 16 AFTER REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING TREES AND PALMS, ALL REMAINING HOLES SHALL BE BACK FILLED AROUND AND UNDER ROOT BALL. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE 2" CALIPER AT D.B.H. MINIMUM FORA 12' HEIGHT TREE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL 1 GALLON MATERIAL SHALL HAVE 12" SPREAD MINIMUM, ALL 3 GALLON MATERIAL TO HAVE 18-24" SPREAD MINIMUM. ALL PLANTING AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF WORK SHALL RECEIVE 100% COVERAGE BY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM (DRIP PREFERRED) UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNER. SEE IRRIGATION PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS. 22. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. IRRIGATION TIME CLOCK TO BE HARD WIRED ON COMPLETION - RESPONSIBILITY OF IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAND WATER OR ARRANGE FOR WATERING DURING PLANTING UNTIL IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS 100% OPERABLE. THIS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 23 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE CONTRACTORS. 24 THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE JOB SITE CLEAN AND FREE FROM ACCUMULATION OF WASTE MATERIAL, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH. 25. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LOCAL CODES. 26. THESE DRAWINGS, DOCUMENTS, AND ALL CONTENTS ARE THE PROPERTY OF CHRIS CABEZAS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED USE OR PRODUCTION, IN PART OR WHOLE, FOR ANY PURPOSE IS UNLAWFUL AND PROHIBITED EXCEPT BY EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT. 27 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY PERMITS OR APPROVALS FROM THE FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRED FOR THE WORK INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT AND ON THESE DRAWINGS. 28. NOTIFY THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS, I.E., COMPACTED SOIL/ SUBGRADE, POOR DRAINAGE, UNCONSOLIDATED SOIL, EROSION, UTILITY CONFLICTS, EXCESSIVE SUN OR SHADE, ETC., PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. 29. ALL PLANTS, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER. v / Z co — co C'7 J Q Q N C LL Z J p/'�� ,^ I .. L V Q I.. W/'� . co W Z o- Q 4 W 0 � Q oZZ oCV� Z Z LLJ H W Z W 0 REVISIONS SEAL: REGISTRAIION NO RIA 8667317 SHEET TITLE'. PLANTING DETAILS + SPECIFICATIONS Sole: N/A Orawn By: CC Checked By: CC Data: 04/14/2021 SHEET NUMBER: LP -3 hAKbOUKDFNE EASTERI1 ENTRY PRIMARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRY INTO PROPERTY TREE PROTECTION FENCE -. (TYPICAL) r WESTERN ENTRY FENCE 0 - n.3' OUT r1 11 1 TEMPORARY FEIVC E - PRIVACY SCREEN PROPERTY CORNER FALLS, N WATER FENCE 0.2' OUT 4.08' PROPERTY CORNER FALLS 1 IN WATER WALL ON UNE 1 �-1_..141.18 SILT FENCE STOCKPILE AND LAY -DOWN AREA SILT FENCE --1x4.00' 4.15'1 4.25'x 4.80' z 0 0 CORNER NOT ACCESSIBLE 4 CORNER NOT z ACCESSIBLE ,,, & " TEMPORARY FENCE + - PRIVACY SCREEN 7 f / CRNERNOT ACCESSIBLE 6.82' X 7.02' SILT FENCE 8 7 L- J TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE + GATE (DIAGRAMMATICALLY DRAWN TO SHOW INTENT) CONSTRUCTION PATH WITH SEDIMENT CONTROL IN LAWN AREA (DIAGRAMMATICALLY DRAWN TO SHOW INTENT) (- 7 LJ 13.02' r-i PARKING AREA L -J I— 7 L! I— 7 12.80' L J TREE PROTECTION FENCE x (TYPICAL) 6.30' 7 7 L_ 32 0.50 CONSTRUCTION PATH FROM EAST ENTRY_ 64 55 6C 0.60' i e i i CORM'. HOT 1CCESSIBLE i d 1 0 8' 18 32' N SCALE: 1110= 1'-0. 0 0 .0 I. E /� (J)U z E I.1.1 co rm en mE S D E Q co U " Z — Z = L Q w U _ N LL1 4 ¢ j Po C%) CC ,m�U Us coon z Z w Z k— w w a_ W U n REVISIONS: No De. eeawm SEAL REGISTRATION NO RLA MAAS SHEET TITLE: CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT PLAN Scale. 1/1'=1'-0' Drawn By: CC Checked By: CC Dale: 04/14/2021 SHEET NUMBER - CP-1 SITE MAP 7200 N Ocean 84d. Delray Beach FL 33483 Gait;!rean) Both ep & 'teams Club m EXISTING BULKHEAD TO BE REMOVED SEWALL 12 PORI./ OF SILT. 0 TOYMOO. 405 PCL 4.3 E OVED) PROPOSED 3 FT WIDE BULKHEAD 1 01 4I DECK HE GUT 5.82 •S' f.: N6: PROM :.B.QAT.tIFC .. 77' DIA COUNCIL e COHIROL ONE; TREE TO 8E I REMOVED Yti MEAN HIGH WATERs0.32' MVO MEAN LOW WATER—(—)2.IT FOAM xAp 25 DIA TROPICAL I ALMOND TO BE REMOVED 60" DIA INDIAN LAUREL TO BE REMOVED 38.89' 7.43 x4$ POMO., OF LOT 7 (89 686 4ANNAN Re FO. PO 75. POCK) RAKE TOP OF WALL TO 8.82 I BE ♦= 4804E GRADE GOLF 1.0111 COURSE MOM, (Pa MA PO 74 POMO 13.50 North GRAPHIC SCALE ▪ 0 le 10 311 (a M) 1 ImG — 20 2L HIDDEN HARBOUR DRIVE MAW, ROAM, TWO NOR, AWN 1100R ULM MOO MO ▪ RA (seA PO,. OF 7� 7 ) (PC 0. PPCC 7s ) DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Des storm event I. instantaneous sMrm over erMrs site Volume of retention ee=0 x1 hr pn o-m InNneM, N1 Iml. Runoff Coefficient C. TO (Mpenrwus) C=02 (pervious) BASIN AN Impervious= 9611 sf Pervious=0 sl Volume =1(9,811 x011.01+10408211 x 11 p4l2lz inml x (1 nrl = m_ Stage 5.33 leinVD 5.25 NAV° Area 140 Volume(Tq Inc otal 1,016 0 8,809 922 822 ToNIVolum e provided IN0007(515+18441.213 of> 801 rf BASIN N2 Impervious= 17388 Pemous=OM volume= 6176s0(1.0)>(u s610.2)1=niNnnl z'inm)+ 11 nr)= 1a_ Shoe 4.25 NAVD 5.00 NAVID Area (s)) vans lx) Inc, Total 1296 922 922 Toter volume prow,. 43 do retention= 1514f> 145 of DRAINAGE BASINS 18 18 1 1 31'114 W Z Q Y J J 13 - CO U 0 O LJ 0 O 0 0_ Z o< CG 0 0 PROPOSED DOCK PLAN BENJAMIN RESIDENCE U K Z O � N O iLBEIDEJISERIDCSACS ❑ ASEPH W SM. PEA NO 47003 E1.n0N1 B BMA FfA N4 ATWA O WWAM P. 5100010 fl. REG. 140. 57605 DATE: SHEET C1 PROJECT N0. f 18-079 Q' Q' Q' P R O P O S E D D O C K P L A N F O R : B E N J A M I N R E S I D E N C E 1 2 0 0 N O C E A N B L V D G U L F S T R E A M , F L C R O S S S E C T I O N S S C H U L K E , B I T T L E & S T O D D A R D , L . L . C . C I V I L & S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R I N G " L A N D P L A N N I N G " E N V I R O N M E N T A L P E R M I T T I N G C E R T I F I C A T I O N O F A U T H O R I Z A T I O N N O . : 0 1 0 0 8 6 6 8 1 7 1 7 I N D I A N R I V E R B L V D , S U I T E 2 0 1 V E R O B E A C H , F L O R I D A 3 2 9 6 0 T E L 7 7 2 / 7 7 0 - 9 6 2 2 F A X 7 7 2 / 7 7 0 - 9 4 9 6 E M A I L I n f o @ s b s e n g i n e e r s . c o m O R A M N C 1 8 0 7 9 - S I Z E M A R K P O K O T e g o n u C R M a C O P Y O R t a F O R 0 9 1 Y R ' R O A M D A T E D E S I G N E D W . P . S . D R A W A . A . C . C H E C K E D S C A L E W . P . S . A S N O T E D D A T E 1 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 1 LEMON HILL WATERFRONT RENOVATION Presentation by The Law Offices of Kent Harrison Robbins on behalf of Stephen & Helen Benjamin, the owners of the property located at 1200 N. Ocean Boulevard, Gulf Stream, Florida known as Lemon Hill . April 22, 2021 1 OVERVIEW OF PROJECT 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS SEAWALL 7 SOLUTION TRULINE SEAWALL 11 Truline u-chcl_ C onc r et+ fill Sleet rebar vinyl el f orm Truline Hybrid System Reinforced Concrete + Vinyl Protection Note: Concept Drawing (dimensions and rebar to be calculated) 12 TRULINE CROSS SECTION 0 TOP OF DUSTING WALL �n sSNS HELD ANCHOR (08 ' DEAD HAN - TBDI — 25 ' ABS JET EIL TER VEEP HOLE E 8' SPACING APPROX. MLW EXISTING GRADE P ROPOSED DREDGE DEPTH -- 18' TRULINE WALL V/ 1 811 EACH /// CAVITY FILLED V TTH CONCRETE /- 811 m SECTION AA TOP FAKTINC. WAI HCIOP C At -i SPACING 1.5 LON G CAP DETAIL z 4.;. A 13 14 - 13 12 11 10 - • 0-- 7 0 4 3 2- 0- -1 - -2 -3- -4 - -0- HAW EXISTING GR ADE PROPOSED 3.82 M.H.W.. 0. 32' MAY M.LW .L PROPOSED B^JixwEAD (97 OTHERS) 14 13 12 94. 8 CO MPOS(IE DECKING 10 - 11 7 - e PT ER*J•40 4 3 2 0 FOR DOCK M.H.AL. 0.32' NAW 1 7 RA (E TOP OF WALL TO BE 4"- 4900E GRADE EX137010 1 IQL vAR�Es \ SP AD02 307 1 S-- u.LW.L. (-)2.17' NAY -2 -3 -4 FIBERGLASS — - -0 PRJNOS RAY PROPOSED 90.7HEAD (9r OTHERS) GGRADEESED • PROPOSED REG0IING W ALL (BY OTHERS) 14 13 14 - 11F- 10 0�- 0- 7;- e- 9.- EXISTING GRADE 11 WRF ROOK EAWM1 n 38 P RO POSED / GRADE M .N.W .L 0.32' NAYD .7. M..W.. (-)2.17' NAY - PROPOSED MAX READ (BY O1NERS) 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS BENJAMIN SITE 15 ri d. V4, Y:.. e3YL - 0 N z Q J EL rn n :i 4. ii eP;9�J lB.J. .. 161UN 1115113.N. PROPOSED BULKHEAD AND DOCK PLAN SCHULKE. BITTLE & STODDARD L.L.C. 7 444, ., ,.7 rte c+ __ . . . _ ., � .w h, 1741" .V.V. SITE PLAN - CLOSE OF VIEW PROPOSED BULKHEAD -� EXISTING BULKHEAD 1 AMY NOT DIME IONS AND LAYOUT ARE ri6il itio t4iler C AMINrid AI bAilil AT11 +L1'_ N z (t) I- ILI < 1. 0 J W LZ o.rrer 61.E.66 c - '!4 I W21$40 171.4.1 • iw MINIMAL PROFILE BOAT LIFT 28 D 6 7 2/0, ---- 12'-0" HYBRID PL ATFORM 3' WIDE X 12' L ONG 20K ELEVATOR LIFT PILE PLACEMENT DIAGRAM ACKNOWLEDGED BY: DATE: 14-- 1 I'-6" 7 10 ALLOWED IN THIS DIRECTI ON ONLY (1Tx 10'x .88"/ .5") 6061-T6 AA I -BEAM 3 CONTRACTOR 10 SECURE TO BULKHEAD PER LOCAL BUILDING C ODES. nw"n am°$e Door°YO° "oo'g1=111>;T en'13su1Oa"w=49.1°':mw'T ' °�'a"�'v.no L174'"=. .m /ONE r10. 6T C7¢ ENG 6 LS REA SION 4 D ATE trtr000 6 UM Pr 1110113 ,ama.0 3 Me 000 rc .u .wr 00000 4,0t rt. ro0 maw W '! JILc BOATIIFTS 201(90 DEGREE PLATFORM 01.n vo ne nn n;,00. w. 0 c B A 29 1>F TAIL }rq'w t''2 4 Airn+ SAR 0.ELaw T.V. el f LATERAL TOMNG BLOCK I"G hP It `-C�f 3/4 �x l�� AWf^. BAQ Awo +. PIST TO T1 . 1 -ten M. BA L'.) r uP.N!r1G 13Loe..FC; �: x I.'12' i 6AP,I b� — I k4:.5 PEckhNIGl 1 BOA T SU r1K (TY P 3hK PIS To 4 `,T(1.o14.t. FRo r�"r I_DG L` ,s of PiS TOt4 ANC1r4 ST D 20 ` Pts To M P .N cNoR at/4" 20k ELEVATOR LIFT - RIGGING & FRAMING PLAN Tel el Oii% C; qE D s 1 N ,W "• 6E0R6E J. LEVERETT FLORIDA .E.38336 S-1' Rev 0 - 0610112019 30 The Cable Handling Unit will sit on t.op of your bulkhead. It will1 ' long x J5 ta1ix 12 wde j• NORTH ELEVATIONS HIDDEN HARBOR DRIVE WEST ENTRANCE 32 Hidden Harbor Drive / West Entrance ' — f =a .. - CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND TURNING RADIUS 36 raf SCIiULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD , L.L. C. as a SWCAA% L`P RDeea wo Norr AC tmO cr e.Vt4 ssemw wn-s x .10 .0sca xOe n. w •ar. eevs�n iuuw:.,e JCL. 1.0 u w JCL. nru n CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TRAVEL ROUTES VERO TEL ?fl n7oaw KM . 0 m terra a� ar.p•bung .. / 0 z 0 I- 0 D H Ct Q (/) a_ 0 0 1.17 L. -d3 Z 7 L r-- )4,2 z pA c/:_ n8 >72 -0z m -0a M —I T cj Dw / 11 1 / / / _4( __�- / � o 0N Lr+ M6014.1.10 ,*):M1.1.1019. Vble WW,Oala.0a .1k «, u,ur.0 .,b:c0 Ali faurn If � A � / f1,l , /- -_ r-1 , � , /%/ I I 1 / ' / I I"� � I / / 3, r 1 L-JE 4; /i / I / / I' /f' -! I / / L 1, L ww NeLsi u Zj7 -dO CO e — ._ ._ 1.1.1(yb 3 ,41YMI1 SN0,- WItJ]WT#f 4 LLN]]tl 311N' ] 1 117aw n yrnl71,aeenu rJJ k_u1. bNWYuui10] 31N ,w> 6O tW. YUq. .1NJu1141.1.Wai .�.ra>�c,.ewlanl, f" 1. — II I I1: , 1 e h Ii L- J s eal _.° - \NS,;). 910J L 1S �D -3 vt liSyl .31%W:1 . a: 111, CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN 43 Constru cti on Pl an Layout, Fenc es + Paths TEM PORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE • GATE (DIAGRAMMATICALLY i DRAWN TO SHOW INTENT- WESTERN ENTRY TREE PROTECTION —L FENCE (TYPICALt TEMPORARY FEN CE A PRIVAC Y SCRE EN TEMPORARY FEN CE & PR IYA CY SCREEN Co nstructio n Layo ut Plan Propo se d Loca tion s a nd Layou t ! PARKING! AREA I , L --J I-- TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYPICAL) CONSTRUCTION PATH WITH SEDIMENT CONTROL IN LA WN AREA 1DAAGRAMMATICALLY DRAWN TO , SHOW INTENT) s.. 1 EASTERN ENTRY PRIMARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRY INTO PROPERTY ' CONSTRUCTION PATH WITH SEDIMENT CONTROL 1 1 LEGEND TE myTTRATIr FE NCE . SCREEN STO 4( TO BE �----- LONST R CTg N YEN14E NM PAOTECTION FENCE SHRUBS CONTROL • CONSTRUCTION POLLUTION CONTROL 45 SEDIMENT CONTR OL 0 LO W a_ <(1) Oz (0< a -J za- Q J / NO 30 CER L1F=C9D MFR COD AME REIO 011 SPAREIOO75 e e **0 0>V1GM.5014S4. E EN O d 04,16.4.4 41 �ys-r M • 1 1r lk rig` >~. fz ' 111.114#1 rt, 1 11.1 a SITE LOCATION MAP 0 350( • A� 00 104EO4s 1 AMEREL0*82 to COO f • 1551 MO MS MO P.M W 00101 6 w *ow* *en 4* *0 0. fE41Us*t 9ES4LETE1 0,000 Pt , 00,3 A MT W V( RAN* .4 V 00,0 %COM,. 4 (L) PLNIT SYMBOLS � ,. Q LP -1 51 ASAP ISO RED! CCON INNTR AAA SANCTA R. MECPTP HA W. OTTW • 1 SLAERS O K RLA T OE DO w Ns MM.. O N SPT TKj O ME N. S1T14 PAM MACES0r. 1•TM1SPISM CKAAPRE R Moos T RAYSO T.E TM S MALL ASKS E5/.5 OT. P 1 N'. TRIM SPAT E' MOVE G RAPE ..' STME5WI ER.Y NAM ER ASE KU COAPKI l.ORIA TORO TOP. PVT BALL GR ASNG KME H MACE REAP TO .PALM PLANTIN G A ND STAKING DETAIL SCA LE ERA LOCATE RAN TS WT. NON SWIG. K 1F0MT. PLANTING1EO(b L FAYRS CUR B PR INK KNER M OTHER ROEOWOE M PANG Pk wTMRARATVA PO K SMC N: °PLAN T 8 SHRUB SPACING DETAIL LANE ANA AD O S.M./IKON Tom CART ON B1EI BOOST HOLDS,/ Tft s5 107 5% D UNG PLANING PROCESS CO NOT .1.4 BAIRNS T ALL Y PIE 0 FRNR CI BART. TmLL L BE LOCATED N 41...1 MILE NINSHTM E PE MAC. TO R N.EOE r5AH1i1M RM NGMARPLA NT SA,L . DORI TOR SR0.N WILRR A ND RBNA4.5 POP AK OC xoc 'ADC It. BC /E TC aRaNDCaERa KM.. SPAC. T RA CH POMP, E COMMO DE 5 01 S YFIP RIM AnTINT STIR SOL M YP RO.TO MOM. SON CAPP ART 10 WE PROTECT. CANER REEVE ♦NEAR CC/ PAT MTN SLAM DUTRA. LOCATE RAC K C UTE NRE MAST AlE 51 .2.001 S ARreLACT C W NG TM. S OP S r ARM MACE M OUND AND COMRLCI SCA NOT E%TMµ T T. AD/ UV RO OT TEAS AT Or 2 UNDERSTOR Y TREE PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL SCALE ERA 9 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL .SCA LE PIA •0 652•14 SC OTT YANO Rro1$ RE MD E NIT MD RECTO NIAACP D 40 r COInNDI A ALA SAULERMN 0,411 04 SC AM APPROVED MO TU S PECKED PAPNTK ARTTtRE EONS NO CORM` SOIL K AAA AT .TENT TO RACE TM br ROHM. Efts KM SPAM .2 FOR PLAINT M ATERI AL DESIG NATED TO BE RE MOVED. THE MIRE ROOT SYSTE M ST ALL BE D UG AND R EMOVED FRO M DE SITE PREFERRED. UNLES S OTHE R/ AST CTD RIER EO BY SEE I RRIGA TION FAOOT.OAL SPECnCAPO N5 TT LANDSC APE CONT RACT OR TO C OORDIN ATE NSTNlAl14M Or R0EATKN SY0TEMWIM IMPOKN ON TO HA CONTRACTOR tT 0.004xN TD RE RD WI RE D Cal a N-REscMeerLm Cr WIT EC A7IONCMNT RACI OR L ANDS CAPE00 NA CONTRACTOR ERAA ND PA TE R OR AR RAN. TO R WATERRG O URET0 RA NMOUN DL ARTEATIO N SYSTE M 15 TOM OPERABLE MS 1STHE SPONMMIm OT I RE tMORO,. CONIMC TLR I Oft R ANT MARIAN SNMII BF ROIRM 1 NO NOR BETTER AS 5ETFO RTHNT.F R OM DA DEP ARTMENT M AOIDAT0IE GRA DES AND STA DAIRDS FO R 1MSERv PLANTS . SECOND E DITIO M TES MN RNCLUMG REAEgNS AND PA RORT EEI M OR EE OM SE SAS S NOUIED IN TIE M ARTI NO S CHED ULE.° DETAILS (Kt T REES SHALL BE STALED N A 0000 INCR MAN0ME MAKER NO ME STOKI NG PE AMTTED (REFER TO BR AD. NOTES MO IL AWNS DE N. SI H ATTR RENDS. OR REL OCAT1 N M A ENWRAP TREESA°P4W 41 RE MARK. HOES SHAL L TIC SAC K FILLED AROO°A ND DPDTR ROOT BALL NM. 111000.0E 410159IM0 0 PE0 NPJT°M LANDSCAPE CONTR ACTOR 4ALL 00041 E 77 ALL EY ETE°PLAD MATEEM1 TO REMAI N FA MILIAR WI TH PE S COPE O PO RK . ft SHALL PENKTFGTED RSDURR+ D01 WELL IS THE S. POMO CONODFA TCO v01RPH ASES ASES PIA A R ANI MOMS OBSTA CLES P RIOR TO MATER./1SC ARRED OR DEST ROYED PRIAM MG A DO DESIGNATE D TO RE MAIN MATS RE PAKEDAT T HE CONT RACTORS UNDSCAPE CONDUCTOR MOULD EX PENSE WIT H SEMAR SPECKS SEE AND KR RV ALL E STOWED CtM NTI RES O OUN ITV MATE RIAL SHOW N. THE L ANDSCAPE AR CHITECTS DRAN+.9 P RI OR TO HI A LL TREES MOM. El METM O O EM TO BE SSRMTTA. AM TO PPED W IT. Y NM'GRAPE A' ORM/ft MAC. HSTM.0110 EOCATT RYfERRE P UNLESS RANT L OT SIML T APE PRE CEMLICF OII RIMISE T°1E0IC YPRESSPAIL. OVER RANTING RA N IN C ASE O NO RE D MAC . S.WL NOT EC USE D( DECAEPAKK5 19 T REES SHALL HAVE T GN P. AT KT RANI MATE R. TERSYMBOLS S HOT. 1DBNRAUO HO MV.ATO R A rT KAT T REE LANDSCA PE ...ft 9146 BE COGWERE0 U NLESS NOTED OT .ERWASE DK .RA5MM TC A ND 410600 S N INK R EED Br LANDSCAPE BO ALL I CALL OSAME RNL SHALL...A IT CONTR ACTOR TO O VOI D ALL UT ENE9 A ND S PREAD ANNAAU M ALL JO EL. NAI ., ALL OT .E ROBS RRICTIOS TO NAVE III SP SPREAD MIMS. ALL SEES S PEC KED MN R ANT MATE RIAL BI AIL. RAM SAS AREAS W,11M11T E 1 0.1T5 ON T HE PINT ANO R ANI LI STSPALI RE O WORN SNARL RECEIVE IOU . COV£ RAOE CON4°ERE O NNW.1 ire AUT OMATIC NR KATIM SYSTEM MP ALL RANT MATER. MUST Ma, OR EX CEED THE SIC KED LTRM AY REQ UI REME NTS TOR SOYA HEI GHT AN D SPRE AD NL MATEM4 S HA D. BE SUBJECT TO AV ARw AIn Ar THE O INSTALL ATION AL L T REES . PNYB SH MAISAN D MK.. (pHCI /ERS ALL BE MRAHTEEO FORA RC S A.A01T 9 F ROTH M. Or FINAL. A CCE PTANCE L ANDSCAPE U TRACT OR WALL LOCH. MEP SEW/ MI RIERDROUOLDID ES OR STRUCTURES P ROT, TO DDONO 73 I ANCOU S0F. CONTRACTOR SHILL A LEASUPE CONT RACTOR S HALL C OMMIATE IRS YI DIU TAM ALE OTHER COONMMTE PATH PRE GENERA ARMO R.. COTRACTMS CONTR ACTOR. PR REMO.. O4L SLAM.07 00 COTAT RI.CT!OR DESR6A O S L ANDSCAPE OMM ACI OR SHALL, TOPEKA MATE RIAL PAK. TO All T ATES.EE P TTE J OB SITE CLEW A° N4IAL I ANON O ANY RANT ...AL TREF S ROMK.GUAM AT OM O W AS. F AWN. . TS HOLD. 0EATE RE MOVAL O ANY 25 LA NDS CA PE RAN NMI N NMI Let ST ALLE D PHDS OA ORA55. RE MOM A ND CLEW COLPLP NCE MtH ALL LOC.& C OPES UPC* ANY LEND MATERIAL A ND ROI AR. ANTI EN OH MINI NG PER SPFCSAw OR KT 11.ESE D SAVAHGS. D OCUME NTS AR4L LANDSCAPE PLANS ARTS ARE TA E P ROPERR OF CHE SS P:DA T•S LA*GSCA5EA0CNITECTU RE NC NT MGRS TAE RESERVED N 1OI EED L SE OR PRODUCTI ON N PA RT OR ANGLE TO R ANY RIBOSE A ANLANFA AND PR OHIBITE D EXCEPT By EX PRESS W RITTEN CONSENT KL RANTI NG A REAS S HOUL D RECENE Mr PL ANTI NG SC R. WA BE SEIM SOO THE CONTR ACTO R S RE0PO NS RLE FOR 0BINNANG ANY MAWS OR ARIROMS TRIM ME FEDER4. STATE OR LOCAL . D OV ERK AENT REOURE D R. TM W ORK I NC LUDE D N.MS CONITACI AD ON THESE ORANIKS NOM. 1.E TIPPER AND TATGSCAPE ARCHITECT MANN UPPMESEE N CONDITIONS IE CO MPACTED SOT. ADIAI AGE UNCON SOLIDATED RAW 016510 Tr CDd0.CTS E5CE55AE SUN OR SWAM EI C P RIOR TO PROCEEDS . WITH LADSCAM RATALLAt° N ALL PLANTS. MATER AIS MD WOR XTAMBHP ARE S UIVECT TO TIE APPROV AL O T. IA .CAPE ARO RIECT AD TANNER S1000 'DEM0 • S PECNC AATD NS s. cs r Pr EC rm. mIsl. LP -2 52 O /1 \19 78 76 X 75 / • • O / tt,EEMiOTECDON DE,Nt TREE DISPO SITION PUNT SY MBOLS Mt" N us 10 E, mrN t- J X u�, ND X r SFYMD N0 \I/ Z% -s(1) % " I 0 Z < Q I^ V Ce z3. oU 2 N a 0 t p wZZ Q zW 08 J uN Okff DNOVOCO LR-1 53 TREE ASSESSMENT FROM ARBORIST 54 THE F .A.BARTLE'1"I' .TEE EXPERT COMPANY 1190 C. MAIN STREET, P.0 BOX 306?, STAMFORD. CT 06905-006' April 09, 2021 Stev en Benjamin 1200 North Ocean Boulevard Gulf Stream, Florida 33483 RE: A ssessment of trees situated near the seawall Mr. Benjamin, I have performed a visual assessment of a selected trees situated at 1200 North Oce an Boulevard in Gulf Stream, Florida. This report is being written per your request. My assignment is to assess the condition of the subje ct trees and the impacts of proposed co nstructio n near the trees, My assessment is limited to the condition of the trees as observed on April 5. 2021. The purpose of this report is intended as a tool to allo w the tree owner or manager to make an educated tree management decision. My assessment was performed from the gr ound. I did not climb an y trees or use any ae rial lift equipment. No tree risk assessmen t was performed as this was outside the scope of the assignment. The property is a historic residence that is situ ated on approximately two an d a half acres on the barrier islan d in South Florida The main residence and the out buildings arc situated towards the east end of the property. There is an expansive lawn and a deep water canal on the west end of the prope rty. The owne r world like to co nstruct a new seawall, as the existing seawa ll is in disrepair. There is a handful of existing trees situated near this are a. A tree survey was prepared for this property in June 2020. All trees and palms on this site have an aluminum tree tag affixed to the trunks. Each tag has a unique number. Tree n umbers on this repo rt reflect the numbers on thc tree tags. A total of three trees were assessed. My observ ation s and reco mmendations are expressed below. Tree# 76 Tree # 76 is a tropica l almon d (Terminafia carappo) with a diameter at breast height of 25 inches. 1 have assigned this tree a condition rating of 40%. This tree is in poor condition. The tree has a lo w live crown ratio and there is storm damage present in the crown. This species is considered to be an inv asive exotic species. These types of plants are harmful to the ecosystem of the region because they spread naturally and displace o ur desirable native species. ', IF\r!i 11 151.1 I.1kI. \1511: 1 1'(Itl .!i I1 tl • M. 1.1141 ii1 ',K11 ,S • I". h,ir1It It inln Lemo n Hill Tree Assessment Page 2 of 4 Jonatha n S. Frank Tree# 77 is an Indi an laur el (Fi cus nhlda) that m easures 60 itches diameter at breast height. 1 ha ve assig ned this tree a 50% c ondition rating, This tree is in fair condition. The tree is situated on the southwest prop erty c omer. This tree poses a conflict with the s eawall, both ab ove gr ound a nd below ground. Tree ro ots c an be observed growing al ong the seawall and there is concern that this will cause damage (See Appendix A- Ph oto 1). Dada 'tree 78 is known as a c ouncil tree (Ficus afrissima). This tree measures 77 i nches diameter at breast height. 1 have assigned a conditio n rating of 40% for this tree . This tree is in poor conditi on. There are old topping cuts found in the crown from eith er previo us storm damage or improper pruning . There are excessi ve sprouts f ound withi n th e crown . These sprouts are very weakly attached. There is also decay present in the branches as well as the mot flare tSee Photo 2). The two fig trees are in poor condition. Th e tropical almo nd is an undesirable species. It seems that if the owner were to remove the subject trees and replant with new trees, thc new trees wo uld be in better c ondition that the existing trees. If the owner is to remove the subject trees, I rec ommend planting a quantity of new trees that would replac e the square f ootage of the canopy of the removed tre es. Fecl free to let me kn ow if you have any questi ons. I l ook forward to he aring from you. Thank s, S. Frank ASCA Registered Consulti ng Arborist #618 IS A Board Certified Master Arborist #FL-5250BT The F.A . Bartlett Tree Expert Company 560 NE 42nd A venue Oakland Park . Florida 33334 SrIF\TIFIr TRr.r CARE \I\I:1. 155' 1300 414 1111 • FAX f!041 F44 5555 • a• com 55 Lemo n Hill Tree Assessment Page 3 of4 APPENDIX A- PH OTOS Jonathan S. Frank +IC NT IF If TRFT r. .IRF IV0' i:11S, i!4 IISI • FAN 1;041 tit IISDN • • •w M13,1r 11 coo Cabbage Palm Assessme nt Pace 1 or 4 I,rnalhan ti 11,m4 AFITATIUIF TREE ARE SITE I00' 'Uil 4?S ilil • FAN S:Di, Sii ORSIR • ., harllril .nn 56 >- ww LIJ > Et Lt I-- D (1) aPrweq,rM' lry Me fir ..t etrttmla ta P re, t Ysbt M tar 01, LANDTE� .. _.__No. e. .v ft 11,11 Ob nf1,34f nifix M'1 ✓Lt PR 58 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PERMIT 59 APPLICATION SCHULKE, BITTLE & STOD DARD. L L C App for an In dividu al or Concept ual Permit 1 mrsc age no-repiy@dep.state.ftus <no -repy@d ep.srate.fl.us > To: wstodderd@sbsengmeers can Cc: SED_Pen nrttln gadep state.fl. us DEP Logs April 12. 2021 William Stoddard <wstodclard§absengmeers.com > FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Env ironmental Prot ection Bo b Martina Cente r 26)O Blau Slone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Re ceipt fo r Submissio n M on. Apr 12. 2021 at 4:27 PM R on DeS antis Gvicerno Jeanette N unez Lt . Go vernor Noah Val enstei n Sec-etar� William Stoddard Lemon Hill 1200 N Ocean Blvd Delray Beach, FL 33483 7232 This is to acknowledge that your Application for an Individual or Conceptual Environmental Reso urce Permit in accordance with Part IV of Chapter 373. F.S.. and Chapter 62.330 F.A.C. was receive d on April 12, 2021. Yo u HAVE waived, in accordance with subsection 62-330. 090(8), F. A. C.. the agency action deadlines in section 5.5 3 of Vo lume 1 in the e vent your pro tect also requires a State 404 Program autho riz ation (o the r than an exemption) unde r Chapter 62.331, F.A. C., and reque st that the a gen cy actio ns for the ERP end Sta te 404 Pro gram au thorizations be issued at the same time. In accordance with Chapters 253 an d 258 (as applicable). F.S., and Chapters 18-21, 18-20 and 18-18 (as applicable), FA.C., activities on state-o wned submerge d lan ds also must be a uthorize d by the Bo ard of Trustee s of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (BOT). The Staff will use the information provided in this submittal to determine if an additional au thorization to perform works on these lands is required. Projects within waters of the United State s may also require federal autho rizatio n from the US Army C orps of Engineers (Corps). Staff will revi ew your application and determine whether your pr oject qualifies for fed eral authorizati on under Florid a's Stat e Programmatic Gener al Permit (SPGP). If your proj ect does not q ualify for SPGP, yo u are responsible for separately applying to the Corps for any required federal authorizati on using the appropriate federal appli cati on form . More informati on abo ut fed er al permitting can be f ound onli ne in th e Jacksonville District Regulatory Division Sourcebook. The Department will not s end a c opy of yo ur applicatio n to the Corps. Your project may also r equire other state, federal and/or local authorizations. You are responsible for obtaining all nec essary approvals prior to beginning y our project. Staff will notify you of any required information or fees n ecessary to complete your applicatio n. If yo u chose to include electronic c opies of any required documents. please submit those as s oon as possible, to the address listed below . Processing of your application may be delayed until these doc uments are received . Please include your applicati on number with all submittals. The DEP District Office for your project is: S outheast District 3301 Gun Club R oad, Mac 7210-1 West Palm Beach FL 33406 (561) 681-6600 Pl ease contact the district o ffic e f or any questions regarding yo ur project. Recejpiinfso natian Application S X0402072-001 Amma n Paid 5250.00; 'N Cu stomer Service Surv ey 2 attachment s 53ablec198b42a8bc7716691d3775.pdt 18x n ona me 50K 60 CORRESPONDENCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SCHULKE, BITnE 8 STODDAnD, 1 1 C RE: 1200 N Ocean Blvd Gulfstream William Stodd ard <wstodd ard(Osbse nglneers .com> F agan, Dezar ae <Dezar ae.Fagan gftoridad ep.gov> Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 4:37 PM T o: William Stoddard <wstoddard©sbsengineers .c om > G ood afternoon William. After reviewi ng th e project over with my supervisor the first three activities listed would qualify for an exemption and a p ermit would not be required fr om the Departm ent The f ourth activity however wo uld trigg er a permit as the proposed a ctivity do es not meet the I ntent of the exemption with new surface w aters being created. This activity would requir e an individual permit . however if no resour ces are proposed to be impacted 1 believe it would be a very simply permit process. Please let me kn ow if you ha ve additi onal que stions. Dezarae' Fr om: William Stoddard <wstoddard @sbse ngmeers.c om> S ent: Thursday, De cember 10. 2020 223 PM To: F agan, D ez arae ‹D ez ara e.Fagan©Fl orida DEPgov> Subje ct 1200 N Ocean Blvd Gutfstream I have a rather unique project in the Town of Gulfstream that I would like to ask y our opini on on if a FOEP/ACOE permit is r equired. If s o, could we submit for an exemption or gen eral permit . The subject prop erty is located al 1200 N Ocean Blvd . y ou need to access the site from Hidd en Harbo ur Drive. The tot is located at the e nd of a manmade canal which has a concrete bulkhead. The property own er wo uld like to h ave more water frontage to allow for mo oring of his boats In order to achieve the frontage we are proposing 10 1. Install a bulkhead in the existing upl ands, landward of the existing bulkhe ad . 2. Excavat e fin m aterial betwe en existing bulkhead a nd new b ulkh ead 3 Install dock and Ilfl along new bulkhead 4. Remove existing bulkhead Since the activity will be occurring la ndward of the current MHWi. this w ould not be within the jurisdiction of the FDEP or ACOE. Once the old bulkhead is removed and the water ext ends to the new bulkhead. the n the s ubmerged prop erty would become a wetland and require permitting for any activities in the future. Plea se confirm if you are in a greement th at this actmty would be exempt r if we do n eed a permit what proces s wo uld you recomme nd Tha nk you 61 MEASURING CLEARANCE HIDDEN HARBOR DRIVE 62 Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STRE AM, FLORIDA APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This fo rm is to be used fo r all development review applicati ons to be h eard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment and/or Town C ommission . To c omplete the fo rm prope rly, plea se rev iew the accompanying T ow n of Gulf Str eam Instr ucti on Manu al for Applicati on for Dev elopment Review Form. Failure to complet e this form prop erly will delay its consideratio n. ARPB File # 1 I - PART II. GENERAL INFOR MATION To be completed by all applicants. A. Pro ject Information I. A.1. Pro ject/Owner Name : 57f P/rfA + fffLt%N 31;4,1A/111 4 I.A.2. Project Address: /zoo n/. vc,MA i $'-dp 6-s(LF Sl£AM , Pc 33`/S a� I.A. 3. Proje ct Property Legal De scription: vzF c°w44F it -P. LT 7 (Lb -f5. ELY 2-941.12- fr) t LT $(Les; wcY 3oz. 1Y) f l'1 —117 z SLY 21/,n,Fr of NLi 2ya . flff of ELY 1/Z i9 fr oF AJ 1/y- I-615 oF r 49) r° TZ R Polis?17 J + 141 oft AP/ r• IBto P7S G= U Y31.s trr t NA Y z1 r E�-Y �W -fie+ 5' uF J t/4 1.Y4 s I. A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, in cluding # of stories, etc. ) .ry pa ., Pito ti; , c ,_ 913 „s P 1a3 < rc Yea ?� s 2.63 kere lo � / Sinf4 7 i'/y , 2- hoe,re / eg nq/ 4' Ceti"' t4 / h 4'h C o 151-4 — pr ode e l- ea 5-; )�t 0,c• kee fe r+. 1- n e w I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: A//4 Architectural style: N1,4 I. A. 6. Check a ll that apply: / Architectural/Site Plan Revie w North O cean Bo ulevard O verlay (comple te section 8) Demolition of Structures (co mplete section C) ✓Land Clearing (complete section D) Special Exception (co mple te se ction E) Varian ce (co mplete se ction G) Non-residential uses (co mplete Section F) I.A.7. Pro posed F.F.E: B. Owner Information I.B.1. Owner Address: /' Zoo N• ocf-Mv 73L vv -u cf 57N—F//in , Ft ? ) 1.6.2. Owner Phone Number: a-SQ. 61 ? — 112_9 Fax: I-10 1 - 2_2 .3 -ill `lO #Y ef- / / e /.K ae/ / °^ S 1. 6.3. Owner Signature : C. Agent Info rmation I.C. 1. Agent Name and Firm Name: G/tita5 c, f6 rz-is / efais cgBG3-'S 144/Ot -'v ' N%4 - Type of Foundation: N1/49 I.C.2. Agent A ddress: by 7fii o7y Azr'/-, FL ?3Y 83 I. C.3. Agent Phone Numbe r (0 ) OA- I. C. 4. Agent Signature: Cell 6600 S U 67'2 ( Fax Official Use Only Pre -App Da te: A RPB Da te: App Date: Recommendation: Com Date: TC Date: Decision: J Application for Development Appro val, Form ADA.32000 Se pte mbe r 2004 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applica nts after pre - applicatio n confere nce with Town St aff . Please be concise but brief. Attach additi onal sheets only when necess ary and be sure to include the appropriate and compl ete qu estion nu mber for each resp onse. A. Project Descriptio n and Justifi cati on III. A. 1. In what zoning district is the proj ect sit e located? KS -0 III.A. 2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district ? Explain: Pis7n/(i e /i/4 577 c, rni C 1. K 06 /r/ vnt ,tF5 / w -1/ '/y fl t Or/ 6 ,Z1 P«0 /'i Tr/ f %trA -z. r/i`Y Iv/I 1' ' 5 r riaaE.c .i. v c TytEff III. A. 3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and g oals, objectives and policies of th e Compre he nsive Plan? es No Explain: Mo c. otNp tt !E e emvi-z 5 fh't.e O/t+'Po9'1 'P III.A. 4. How are ingress and egress to the prope rty to be provided? /1/ADEN /MX. fa O/t. III.A.5. How are the following utilitie s being provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage b. Sanitary Sewer c. Potable water d. Irrigatio n Water e. Electricity f. Telephone g. Gas h. Cable Television III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or mo re structures, please describe ho w the structures are co nsistent with the criteria in Section 66-144 of the Town of Gulf Stre am Code. (Attach additional shee t if necessary. ) N/A AV A PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORM ATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre -applicatio n con ference with Town staff. An swering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Addition al Appro vals/Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land are a within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right-of-way? Yes (If "Yes", Section B of this part must be complete d.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? Yes No (If " Yes", Se ction C of this part must be completed. ) IV. A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or the filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50%) of the landscape area of a deve loped lot? Yes o (If "Yes", Section D of this part must be comple ted.) IV.A.4. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? Yes No (If "Y es", Section E of this part must be co mple te d.) IV. A. 5. Is the projectat v ariance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? Yes No (If "Yes", Section G of this part must be completed.) Applicatio n for Development Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Page 3 Se ptember 2004 Town of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay P ermit IV. B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV. B.2. De scribe the need and justificati on for the disturb anc e/addition: IV.B.3. Will the disturba nce /addition destroy or seriously impair vis ual relationships among buildings, landscape features and ope n space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean B oulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: IV.B.4. How is the design consiste nt with the Al A La ndscape Enhancem ent Project? IV.B.5. What mitigation is propo sed so that the disturbance/addition has the least impact possibl e to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: C. Pro jects Requiring a Demolitio n Permit IV.C. 1. When a re the existing structures to be demolished? IV.C.2. Whe n are the proposed structures to be constru cted? IV.C. 3. What is the la ndmark status of the structures to be demolishe d? D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North O cean Boulevard Overlay District: rote 4. 772‘05 A -71-t fit -t e 5 O.P FiP PE. it a o V4l . rb"V //91/A 1-0" CoND/T/o'J /1. 4TiN6t R," if-rof/4cr f F /N 70.. e,ND/new . IV. D. 2. Describe the need and justification for the removal/relocation: 5f O• ,4-13.9vE. IV. D. 3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: -rt. (i) Nor/v, Tof fs, /1ND aft' EN /) NA' flvE "'Win s dite /sos6P IV.D. 4. How are the remaining and relocated ve getative mate rials to be pro tected and pre served during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? 1-r7?Z £v 7Hi v 10 {T of 770 %hiF s' p .s* c v O ft a/� 11/9- - it 7?z /f4-7Ec n o.✓ , i✓c ,E IV. D. 5. What replacement materials are proposed? (2. ) 6//"i 8o cI ni 6o Tn1ff 7/1' 6t) , CS) 5,4 -AA -l. MI M5 /is-2_f/T) t (6) /tvr•r Z P.42 Ms ( /s/ w) . Application for Development Approval, Form ADA. 32000 Page 4 September 2004 TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 21-6 Address: 1200 North Ocean Boulev ard Pro posed Improvement: Appro vals Requeste d: Gro ss Lot siz e: N/A Pro posed Total Floor Area: N/A Owner: St ephen and H elen Benjamin Agent: Chris Cab ezas, Landscape Architect The applicant is seeking a Land Clearing Permit to rem ove 4 trees in p oor condition and other landscaping materials. Additionally, the applic ant is seeking a Level II Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit l andscaping impr ovements that includes the installation of 2 native trees and 11 native palms as per the det ailed drawing. A. Land Clearing P ermit to rem ove 4 trees that are in poor condition with the installati on of 2 native trees and 11 native palms as replacement trees. B. Le vel II Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit landscaping improvements as per the detailed drawing. Effective Lo t Area: N/A Allowable: N/ A Zoning District: RS -Ocea n West D istrict Height: N/ A Finished Flo or: N/A Ea ve Height: N/A Issues Co nsidered During R eview: Sectio n 66-141:Applicability: A rchitectural/Site Plan Review -Levels 1, 2 and 3 Section 66-144 Sta nda rds: Rega rding Level II architectura l/ site plan re view Sectio n 66-396 thro ugh 66-402: Landscaping Section 70-146 through Section 151: General landscape standards Section 70-187 Table of district standards Motions: Motion to Appro ve a La nd Clearing Permit based on a finding that the Land Clearing Permit to remo ve 4 tree s in poor condition and to install 2 native trees a nd 11 native palms as re placement trees meets the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable revie w standards. Motion to Appro ve a Level II Architectural/Site Plan Review to permit landscaping improvements as per the detailed drawing based on a finding that the landsca ping impro vements meet the minimum intent of the D esign Manual and applicable review standards with the follo wing conditio n: 1. A ny mino r modifica tions to the appro ved landsca ping shall be submitted to the To wn Mana ger for review and approva l and any major mo difications sha ll be brought ba ck to the ARPB for review a nd approval before commencement of landscaping. A rchitectural Review and Pla nning Bo ard ARPB File #21-6 A RPB April 22, 2021 Page 2 ARPB Da te: Februa ry 25, 2021 Action - La nd Clearing Permit: Postpo ned to March 25, 2021 Level II Architectura l/Site Plan Revie w: Postponed to March 25, 2021 ARPB Da te: March 25, 2021 Action - Land Clea ring Permit: Po stpo ned to April 22, 2021 Level II Architectura l/Site Plan Review: Po stpo ned to April 22, 2021 ARPB Date: A pril 22, 2021 A ction - Land Clearing Permit: Level II A rchitectural/Site Plan Review: