Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 12, 2003 Commission• • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:00 a.m. DATE: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside Commissioners Chairman: Ron Roberts 1st Vice Chairman: Roy Wilson Vice Chairman: Robin Lowe Bob Buster, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside James A. Venable, County of Riverside Roy Wilson, County of Riverside Marion Ashley, County of Riverside Art Welch / Sue Palmer / Bill Jenkins, City of Banning Placido L. Valdivia / Roger Berg, City of Beaumont Robert Crain 1 George Thomas, City of Blythe Gregory Schook / John Chlebnik, City of Calimesa Jack Wamsley / Mary Craton, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Paul Marchand, City of Cathedral City Juan M. DeLara / Richard Macnicki, City of Coachella Jeff Miller 1 Jeff Bennett, City of Corona Greg Ruppert / Matt Weyuker, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin Lowe / Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet Percy L. Byrd / Robert A. Bernheimer, City of Indian Wells Mike Wilson / Gene Gilbert, City of Indio Terry Henderson 1 Don Adolph, City of La Quinta Robert L. Schiffner / Thomas Buckley, City of Lake Elsinore Frank West / Bonnie Flickinger, City of Moreno Valley Jack F. van Haaster 1 Warnie Enochs, City of Murrieta Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco Dick Kelly / Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert William G. Kleindienst / Chris Mills, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris G. Dana Hobart / Ron Meepos, City of Rancho Mirage Ameal Moore / Joy Defenbaugh, City of Riverside Chris Buydos / Jim Conner, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Anne Mayer, Director, Caltrans District #8 Eric Haley, Executive Director Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please 4... ,pte:d ::d submit :a Ta ti.; on Cara' C:. tha 1st of the Ifl,34.0d • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.retc.org AGENDA * Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 12, 2003 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lernon Street, First Floor, Riverside In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Commission at (909) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1 . CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 41/ 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5A. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-020, "'RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE REALTY IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, THAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE WIDENING, REALIGNMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 74, BETWEEN DEXTER AVE., IN LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, TO 7TH STREET, IN PERRIS, CALIFORNIA (PROJECT SEGMENTS 1 & 2) " Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 2 1) Conduct a public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report:: i. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain. v. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-020, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS: 349-060- 015, 349-342-011, 349-342-005, 349-342-004, 349-341-001, 345- 220-065, 345-220-032, 345-220-034, 345-200-005, 345-160-048, 345-150-006, 345-150-007, 345-150-004, 345-150-012, 345-150- 001, 345-070-010, 345-070-020, 345-070-011, 345-060-040, 345- 060-041, 345-060-049, 345-060-046, 345-060-045, 345-100-001, 345-050-016, 345-090-007, 345-090-010, 345-090-011, 345-080- 047, 342-210-036, 342-210-021, 342-210-033, 342-210-031, 342- 210-039, 342-210-024, 342-120-013, 342-210-028, 342-120-041, 342-200-035, 342-200-034, 342-130-002, 342-150-010, 342-140- 008, 342-100-047, 342-100-024, 342-100-023, 342-100-044, 342- 052-002 & 342-092-027 & 342-052-023, 342-052-006, 342-052- 007, 342-052-008, 342-052-010, 342-052-017, 342-051-009 thru 012, 342-051-017, 342-064-008, 342-064-007, 342-064-008 & 009, 342-061-006, 342-062-003, 342-071-003, 342-072-003, 342- 071-005 342-071-006, 342-072-010, 342-040-030, 342-072-022 & 023, 326-250-026, 326-240-024, 326-240-031, 326-240- 023,326-240-021, 342-071-007, 326-234-002, 342-072-011, 342- 072-024 (Project Parcel Nos. 13573-1, 13625-1, 13631-1, 13632-1, 13637-1 ,13639-1, 13644-1, -2, 13648-1, 13662-1, 13665-1, Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 3 13667-1, 13668-1, 13670-1, 13676-1, 13677-1, 13682-1, 13690- 1, -2, 13692-1, 13696-1, 13697-1, -2, 13700-1, 13704-1, 13705-1, 13706-1, 13709-1, 13713-1, 13716-1, -2, 13721-1, -2, 13726-1, 13751-1, -2, 13754-1, -2, 13756-1, -2, 13757-1, -2, -3, 13759-1, - 2, 13761-1, 13770-1, -2, 13771-1, -2, -3, 13773-1, -2, 13776-1, - 2, 13777-1, -2, -3, 13778-1, -2, 13795-1, 13797-1, 13809-1, -2, 13810-1, -2, 13811-1, -2, 13812-1, -2, -3, 13816-1, 13820-1, 13821-1, 13822-1, 13824-1, 13833-1, -2, 13834-1, 13839-1, 13845-1, 13846-1, 13849-1, 13855-1, 13863-1, 13866-1, -2, 13867-1, 13868-1, -2, 13876-1, -2, 13878-1, 13879-1, -2, 13889- 1, 13896-1, 13897-1, 13898-1, 13901-1, 13906-1, -2, 18971-1, 19752-1, -2, and 19753-1, -2), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Widening, Realignment, and Improvement of State Route 74, Between Dexter Avenue, in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Project Segments 1 & 2)." 5B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-021, "RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE REALTY IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ►N RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, THAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF GREENWALD AVENUE AT THE MEADOWBROOK AVENUE INTERSECTION WITH STATE ROUTE 74 - Page 238 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 4 v. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No, 03-021, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS: 349-124- 004, 349-124-003, 349-124-021, 349-124-001, 349-124-005 349- 342-013, 349-342-011, (Project Parcel Nos. 90002-1, 90003-1, 90004-1,-2, 90005-1, 90001-1, 90006-1, 90008-1, -2), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Realignment of Greenwald Avenue at the Meadowbrook Avenue Intersection with State Route 74." 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending January 31, 2003. Page 277 7B. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT O vervie w This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending December 31, 2002. Page 281 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 5 7C. CITY OF CANYON LAKE LOAN Page 294 Overview This item is for the Commission to grant the City of Canyon Lake an advance of Measure "A" - Local Streets and Roads Funds. 7D. FEDERAL FUNDING OBLIGATION BALANCES O vervie w This item is for the Commission to: Page 317 1) Approve moving unexpended CMAQ Funds to the State Route 60 HOV Project from the East Interstate 215 Junction to Redlands Boulevard; and, 2) Receive and file a report on the status of federal funding obligation balances. 7E. CITY OF PERRIS CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY SUBSTITUTION REQUEST Page 319 O vervie w This item is for the Commission to approve the City of Perris request to substitute the State Route 74 and Redlands Signal Project with a "Round About" Project at the same location and transfer the unobligated CMAQ Funds from the signal project to the round about project. 7F. FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS ALLOCATION FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE PALO VERDE VALLEY APPORTIONMENT AREA Page 320 Overview This item is for the Commission to allocate the FY 2002-03 Local Transportation Funds for Local Streets and Roads purposes in the Palo Verde Valley Apportionment Area. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 6 7G. AMENDMENTS TO FISCAL YEAR 2003 MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITIES OF CORONA, LAKE ELSINORE, AND PALM DESERT Page 322 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the amendments to the FY 2003 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the Cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore, and Palm Desert, as submitted. 7H. AGREEMENT NO. 03-33-055 FOR ADDITIONAL ON -CALL MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF MEASURE "A" CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Page 335 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-33-055 (Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. RO-9832) with Ninyo & Moore to provide additional on -ca material testing services in support of Measure "A" projects scheduled for construction for the remainder of this fiscal year, for an additional base amount of $86,000.00, and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 71. MEASURE "A" FUNDED SPECIALIZED TRANSIT PROGRAMS Page 342 Overview This item is for the Commission to authorize RCTC staff to seek and/or develop additional Measure "A" Funded Specialized Transit Programs. 7J. AGREEMENT NO. 03-33-038 FOR RIVERSIDE -LA SIERRA METROLINK STATION PHASE II PARKING LOT EXPANSION O vervie w This item is for the Commission to: Page 346 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 7 13 Award Agreement No. 03-33-038 for the construction of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase 11 Parking Lot Expansion Project to Riverside Construction Co. for the amount of $1,199,850 plus a contingency amount of $150,150 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed contract authorization of $1,350,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 71<. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 352 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 71. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Page 370 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. 8. RESULTS OF THE MANAGEMENT AUDIT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIALISTS, INC. Page 372 O vervie w This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file the Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. TS1); and, 2) Recommend that no Measure "A" Specialized Transit Funding be allocated to TSI in FY 2004. 9. PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 BUDGET Page 385 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the proposed Commission's Policy Goats and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Budget. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 8 10. SB 321 EXTENSION STREAMLINING Page 392 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt the policy regarding project extensions for the Commission's SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. 11. INITIATION OF THE CEQA PROCESS ON THE MORENO VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CETAP CORRIDOR O vervie w This item is for the Commission to: Page 395 1) Endorse the release of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the preservation of right-of-way for potential new north -south transportation facilities linking Riverside/Moreno Valley with the East Valley of San Bernardino County; and, 2) Reduce the identified budget for work on this corridor from $2,010,450 to $1,187,000. 12. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 13. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT O vervie w This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. 14. CLOSED SESSION ITEM - Adjourn to RCTC Conference Room "A" O vervie w A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) Names of Parties: "No on A -No LA", San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v RCTC, County of Riverside, and County Board of Supervisots, Eric Haley Case Number: RCV384012 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda March 12, 2003 Page 9 • B. Conference with. Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) Significant Exposure to Litigation to Subdivision(b) Number of Potential Cases: 1 15. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 9, 2003, Board Room, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • ?u 13Li rnm e nfs y4 (-4/v d'o r I AM WRITING IN REPLY TO YOUR LETTER POST MARKED JANUARY 14, 2003. IN THAT LETTER YOU STATED THAT I WAS ADVISED ON November 22ND THAT THE OFFER TO PURCHASE MY PROPERTY WAS RECINDED AND THAT MS PARKS HAD NO PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF MY PROPOSED DEC. 8711 MEETING WITH FELLOW PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE ATTORNYS I INVITED TO ADVISE US OF OUR RIGHTS. YOU HAVE BEEN MISSINFORMED. I WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT TO YOU A SHORTENED CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS. WE CALLED MS PARKS ON OCTORBER 12TH TO REQUEST THE APPEAL TO COMMENCE.. IF YOU REMEMBER, YOU MAILED A LETTER TO ME STATING YOUR OFFICE WOULD BE PROCEEDING WITH A HEARING TO LATER THAN OCTORBER AND THAT WE COULD HAVE OUR ATTORNY PRESENT. YOU MAY ALSO KNOW THAT WE NEVER GOT THAT HEARING. I CALLED MS PARKS ON NOV 12TH TO REQUESTED TO MEET WITH HER BECAUSE WE WANTED A COPY OF THE APPRAISEL PREFORMED BY SYDNEY HAWRAN OF DONOHUE . WHICH I HAD BEEN DENIED EARLIER BY PAM BAIRD. MS PARKS AND MY HUSBAND GOT INTO A HEATED DISCUSSIION. DURING WHICH MS PARKS THREATENED; "IF YOU FEEL THAT WAY ABOUT IT WE WILL BUILD THE HIGHWAY AND JUST LEAVE YOU THERE." MY HUSBAND REPLIED; "SURE, YOU ARE RIVERSIDE COUNTY, YOU CAN MAKE UP THE RULES AS YOU GO ALONG!" WE THEN GOT UP AND LEFT HER OFFICE. SHE CAME AFTER US AND SAID "ARE YOU SO ANGRY THAT YOU CAN'T SAY GOOD-BYE?" WE SAID GOOD- BYE AND LEFT. BELIEVE ME SIR; THAT CONVERSATION WAS A THREAT NOT AN ADVISEMENT. WE WERE NOT ADVISED OF THE REVERSAL UNTIL THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 22ND 2003. THERE IS ANOTHER MATTER I WOULD LIKE TO ADVISE YOU OF. MS PARKS BLATENTLY TRYS TO AVOID SPEAKING TO ME. WHEN WE WERE ADVISED OF THE MEETING WITH MR SUGITA; A YOUNG LADY CALLED MY HOME. SHE ASKED TO SPEAK TO MR JOHNSON. I TOLD HER MY HUSBAND WAS NOT HOME. I THEN HEARD HER WHISPER TO SOMEONE IN THE BACKGROUND. SHE CAME BACK TO THE PHONE AND TOLD ME THAT THE MEETING WAS BEING HEALD. I TOLD HER THAT LEAGGLY; THE POPERTY IS IN MY NAME ONLY. WHY WAS SHE ASKING TO SPEAK TO MY HUSBAND? SHE SAID THAT THAT WAS WHAT SHE WAS TOLD TO DO. A MEETING ON JANUARY 8TH THAT WAS HEALD BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; MY NEIGHBOR THE IMMEDIATE NORTH AND IMMEDIATE SOUTH BOTH GOT A LETTER ADVISING OF THE MEETING AND ADVISING ALSO THAT UNLESS THEY RESPONDED TO THAT LETTER THEY COULD NOT BE HEARD BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. I DID NOT GET THAT LETTER. I CALLED MS KOPENHAVER TO FIND OUT WHY AND WAS TOLD MY NAME WAS LEFT OFF HER LIST PROVIDED BY MS PARKS. SIR I COULD GO ON WITH INSTANCES THAT SHOW MS PARKS HAS A PREJUDICE AGAINST ME. THEY ARE ALL DOCUMENTED AND I WILL PROVIDE THEM IF YOU REQUEST. anuary 2, 2003 Ms. Parks, We have received your letter of December 17, 2002 rescinding Riverside Counties offer for our whole property but your effort to cover up your motives are ridiculous. You are trying to use our letter of August 13, 2002 against us when we have explained to you and Mr. Sugita in multiple meetings since September, 2002 that we do not wish to stay on this property with the highway being widened so close to the house. It is very clear to us that none of this has taken place until you were notified by one of the property owners on Highway 74 that we were organizing the property owners and having a meeting on December 6`1', 2002 with attorneys because of the unfair offers you were making the property owners for their properties. This is clearly retribution for our part in the effort to fight Riverside County. It was my understanding that amendments #1 and #7 of the United States Bill of Rights protected me from retribution from any government employee. Everyone we have dealt with associated to this project is well aware that we do not wish to stay on this property in close proximity to the highway . It is equally clear that you are not dealing with us in good faith. Everyone knows also, that the noise and fumes will make life unbearable. Sincerely, Ianthe M. Roberson Bentley �- Johnson Property Owner Cc: Hideo Sugita Kendall McVey Martz Easter Mike Sylvester Pamela Baird Kathy Wooley PUBLIC Detach a nd s ubmit to Clerk of th e Board SUBJECT OF COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO(S) AND SUBJECT(S): NAME: —LA-311', 3—C I-% DATE: l � -- 63 A DDRESS: L 3(, ! c 1}uy +7 L/ TEL. NO: 6 .i ? - S REPRESENTING: BUSINESS ADDRESS: fiCTC 7/99 TEL. NO: Detach and s ubmit to Clerk of the Board PUBLIC SUBJECT OF COMMENTS: / PUBLIC COMMENTS: I'Y'1 / Y1Erj.1 no) AGENDA ITEM NO(S) AND SUBJECT(S): NAME: ILard ?)Ia vta 1.4W DATE: a/ l -/+ ADDRESS: , ,1-7.qQ -pkold -7L/ TEL. NO: gocii &5-7-49'70 REPRESENTING: Se / - BUSINESS A DDRESS: ,Sarruz Q.bokk TEL. NO: RCTC 7/99 Detach and submit to Clerk of the Board PUBLIC COMMENTS: A GENDA ITEM NO( AND SUBJECT(S): NAME: ADDRESS: SUBJECT OF PUBLI C REPRESENTING: BUSINESS TS: DATE: 5/4270n1 TEL. NO: r z (.96 ADDRESS: teNaa CZ, } c,Z ATEL . NO: RCTC 7/99 Detach a nd submit to Clerk of the Board PUBLIC SUBJECT OF COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO(S) AND SUBJECT(S): NAME: �/� ADDRESS: 7d WAI *95 / `"' TEL. NO ,199/,%e'%-' W,4 REPRESENTING: BUSINESS ADDRESS: RCTC 7/99 DATE: //Zf 11) TEL. NO: • AGENDA ITEM 4 Minutes • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1 CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chairman Ron Roberts at 9.05 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Marion Ashley Daryl Busch Bob Buster Chris Buydos Percy L. Byrd Juan DeLara Frank Hall Terry Henderson Dick Kelly Robin Lowe Anne Mayer Jeff Miller Ameal Moore Gregory S. Pettis Ron Roberts Robert L. Schiffner Gregory V. Schook John F. Tavaglione Placido Valdivia Jack van Haaster Jim Venable Jack Wams'ley Art Welch Frank West Commissioners Absent Robert Crain G. Dana Hobart William G. KCleindienst Greg Ruppert Michael H. Wilson Riverside County Transportation Con1mission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS JoAnn McAnlis, expressed her concern regarding the lack of communication with the communities potentially affected by the CETAP alternatives. 4, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 8, 2003 M!S!C (Lowe/Miller) to approve the January 8. 2003 minutes as submitted. 5, ADDITIONS/REVISIONS Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Commission, noted there were no additions or revisions to the agenda. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Lowe/Miller) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 6A. MID -YEAR REVENUE PROJECTIONS Ivan Chand, Chief Information Officer, briefly reviewed the Mid -Year Revenue Projections, indicating that revenues have exceeded projections, approximately 13% higher for the first six months than the same time last year. Therefore, staff recommends increasing the current year revenue projections by 2.5%. 1) Approve the Mid -Year Revenue Projections; and, 2) Approve the Planning Budget Adjustment to reflect the Local Transportation Funds (LTF) Planning Revenue and Expenditures. 68. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND PROJECTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 Approve the projections of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) apportionment for the Coachella Valley, Palo Verde Valley, and Western Riverside County Areas. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 3 6C. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Approve the following budget adjustments: 1) $55,000 increase for Administrative Legal Services; 2) $197,851 increase for Administrative Election Fees; 3) $1,000,000 increase for STA Distributions; and, 4) $100,000 increase for Rail Station and Legal Fees. 6D, CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending December 31, 2002. 6E. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the quarter ending December 31, 2002. 6F. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the months of October, November, and December 2002. 6G. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Adopt the following bill positions and associated policy position: Support if Amended - SCA 2 (Torlakson, D -Antioch) as introduced 1212/02; Support - ACA 7 (Dutra, D -Fremont) as introduced 1/14/03; Policy Position Support - ability of counties to enact or reenact local option transportation sales taxes by 55% majority vote; and, 2j Receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. 6H. SECTION 5311 AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS Receive and file information on Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance Funds. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 4 61. FISCAL YEAR 2003 AMENDMENT TO COMMUTER RAIL'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN - FLEXING OF STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5307 FUNDS AND REVISION TO THE PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA PARKING STRUCTURE 1) Authorize the flexing of State Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP Funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 Program; 2) Include the North Main Corona. Parking Structure in the Program of Projects for the Riverside - San Bernardino Urbanized Area as well as the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan; and, 3) Amend the Fiscal Year 2003 Short Range Transit Plan for the Commuter Rail Program to reflect the change in funding sources. 6J. FISCAL YEAR 2002 TRANSIT OPERATORS' REPORT Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2002 Transit Operators' Report, 6K. CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE/SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE 11111 Approve the attached membership roster for the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee (CAC/SSTAC). 6L. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION AND SCOPE OF PROJECT CHANGE FOR THE CITY OF CORONA 1) Grant the City of Corona a change in the scope of project for their Chase Drive/El Cerrito Bikeway project and an extension to June 30, 2003, to complete the project; and, 2) Grant the City of Corona an extension to June 30, 2003, to complete the Bus Stop Accessibility project, 6M. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 5 6N, RESOLUTION NO. 03-019, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH POLICY RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING OPERATIONS AT COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS" Approve Resolution No. 03-019, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Authorizing the Executive Director to Establish Policy Rules and Regulations Regarding Operations at Commuter Rail Stations". 60. HIGHWAY AND COMMUTER RAIL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Highway and Commuter Rail Construction Program Update as an information item. 6P. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-063 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CCTV SECURITY SYSTEM AT THE RIVERSIDE -LA SIERRA AND WEST CORONA METROLINK STATIONS Approve an increase to the contract contingency amount of Agreement No. 02-33-063 with Lynch Communication, Inc., by $30,000, from $40,100 to $70,100, to cover the costs for additional unforeseen work associated with the construction of the CCTV Security System at the Riverside -La Sierra and West Corona Metrolink Stations and connection to the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station, 6Q. AGREEMENT NO. 03-33-035 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A CCTV SECURITY SYSTEM AT THE EXISTING PEDLEY METROLINK COMMUTER RAIL STATION 1) Award Agreement No. 03-33-035 to New Age Communications for the construction of a CCTV Security System at the existing Pedley Metrolink Commuter Rail Station, with a data link to the monitoring facilities at the existing Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Commuter Rail Station for the amount of $199,800.98 plus a contingency amount of $40,199.02 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total contract amount of $240,000.00; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 6 6R. AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-054 WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONSTRUCT RIGHT TURN LANES ON GILMAN SPRINGS ROAD TO STATE ROUTE 79 1) Approve entering into Shared Funding Agreement No. 03-31-054 with the County of Riverside for the construction of right turn lanes on Gilman Springs Road to SR 79 for $ 100,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 65. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR SURVEY AND MATERIAL TESTING ON - CALL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF FUTURE MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY AND COMMUTER RAIL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1) Authorize staff to prepare and advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP), for consultant services to provide Survey and Material Testing On -Call Services in support of future Measure "A" Highway and Commuter Rail Construction Projects; 2) Form a selection committee, comprised of staff representatives from RCTC, County of Riverside, City of Riverside, City of Moreno Valley, City of Perris, and Caltrans, to review,evaluate, and rank all RFPs received; and, 3) Negotiate contracts with the top ranked consultant(s) and return to the Commission with contract recommendations. 6T. AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROUTE 60 HOV PROJECT IN MORENO VALLEY 1) Approve entering into a Project Construction Program Supplement to obligate CMAQ funding for construction of the SR 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the City of Moreno Valley; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Supplement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize staff to advertise bids for construction of the SR 60 HOV lanes within the City of Moreno Valley, contingent upon finalization of the Project Construction Program Supplement and receipt of the Authorization to Proceed with Construction from the Caltrans Office of Local Assistance; and, 4) Bring back to the Commission the results of the bidding for contract award to the lowest, responsive bidder. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 7 7. REPORT ON STATE BUDGET DISCUSSIONS AND IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS D.J. Smith, Commission's State Lobbyist, reported on the status of the State Budget and its impacts on transportation, highlighting the following: • The State Budget Subcommittees did not pass the Governor's recommendation to suspend Proposition 42. • Status of Transportation Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Funds and possibility of State concessions to occur. • Outline of ACA 11 which will appear on the March 2004 statewide ballot. This amendment would commit a percentage of the General Fund to pay for state and local infrastructure projects. • Voter opinion research conducted in January showed support of ACA 11 and opposition to the suspension of Proposition 42 and the lowering of the voter threshold for measure programs. • Truck weight fee collection in California was changed to be in conformance with the Federal Government resulting in a net loss of $140 million per year to the State Highway Account, • The removal of MTBE for gasoline will result in less Proposition 42 monies. for a $50 to $100 million per year impact. Eric Haley, Executive Director, indicated that discussions have been initiated with Caltrans to keep the Measure "A" program and project development moving forward. He also noted that the STIP Projects Priority Ad Hoc Committee will convene and return a recommendation to the Commission. 8. CETAP INTERNAL CORRIDORS RECOMMENDATIONS Steve DeBaun, Commission's Legal Counsel, reminded the Commissioners of the possible conflict of interest specific to ownership of property along any of the designated routes for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development, presented the CETAP Advisory Committee and staff recommendation for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. She also briefly reviewed the Federal Agencies Proposal and the draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). If the Commission agrees to consider the Federal Agencies Proposal, staff recommends that an Ad Hoc Committee or the Executive Committee be charged with providing direction to staff on the fin& elements of the MOU, Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page Mary Ann Rondinella, Federal Highway Administration, on behalf of the Federal Agencies, expressed strong support of the CETAP effort and appreciation for the RCTC and Caltrans District 8 staffs for their leadership throughout the process. She also expressed gratitude to the RCTC consultant team for their remarkable efforts in gathering the environmental and transportation data. She then provided a summary of the Federal Agencies Proposal. It is intended to accomplish four objectives: 1) ensure that one alternative can be selected for each corridor; 2) eliminate the need to revisit a range of alternatives in the future; 3) address the specific information needs to allow the Federal Agencies to support the selection of a single alternative for each corridor; and 4) provide timely resolution of issues, supported by a commitment from senior managers of ail the Federal Agencies. Commissioner Robin Lowe expressed her appreciation to the CETAP Advisory Comrnittee for their efforts in this process and strongly noted that the Commission extended to the public more ',public hearing than stated in the law and went beyond what was necessary to satisfy RCTC's commitment to the public. This allowed all regions to express their opinions and concerns. She also extended appreciation to the public for their efforts in presenting well thought out regional solutions, to the RCTC staff and Steve Smith for their excellent work effort, and the Building Industry Association (BIA) for their support of this process. At this time, Chairman Roberts opened public comments for this item. A. Peter Reynolds, Victoria Grove resident, expressed his opposition to the northern Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore (HCLE) route stating i!t was an illogical choice. He also expressed concern that the potential alternative was not disclosed to homebuyers. Commissioner Bob Buster explained that property owners have not been notified because the staff recommendation was for the southern HOLE route. After the staff recommendation was made, the Cities of Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley, and Perris made an endorsement for the northern HCLE route. He assured the public that there will be public hearings in the affected areas and a complete evaluation of ail the alternatives will be done. B. Peter Herzog, representing the Coalition for Better Transportation, expressed support for the staff recommendation noting it supports community and transportation needs. He also urged the removal of • • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 9 Diane Dunhoff, representing Winchester 1 -tills property owners, requested the remove Alternatives 7a and 7b from any further consideration and expressed support for the hybrid alternative. D. Leer Pearce, representing the Coalition for Better Transportation, expressed appreciation to the CETAP Advisor Committee and the Commission for their efforts and presented support from over 700 property owners. E. William Holzwarth, representing Warming -ton Land Co., expressed belief that Alternative 7b negatively impacts the future development of land along Scott Road. It has negatively impacted property rights and values in the affected area. He also stated that he believes any further public record of Alternative 7b as a potential alternative will continue to adversely affect the area. He requested clarification of the CETAP Advisory Committee recommendation as to the status of Alternatives 7a and 7b. He recommended that a conclusory provision be added to the final EIR to remove Alternatives 7a and 7b as potential future alternatives. Cathy Becthel responded that the hybrid alternative is recommended as the preferred alternative. Alternatives 7a and 7b are no longer identified as preferred alternatives but witi be included in the final environmental document. F Art Cassel, Lake Mathews property owners, expressed his concern that the RCIP and CETAP efforts have lost their vision to be regional solutions. He believes jobs need to be brought to the County instead of providing the means for Riverside County resident to travel to other counties to work and neither RCIP or CETAP address this need. G. Barbara BoxoId, Victoria Grove resident, concurred with the previous speaker's comments and expressed her strong opposition to the northern HCLE route. Stephen Never, Victoria Grove resident, expressed his opposition to the northern HCLE route. Wayne Rodman, Cajalco area resident, expressed his opposition to the northern HCLE route and requested better communication to the affected area. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 10 Kerry Cole, Victoria Grove resident, expressed his opposition to the northern HCLE route and concern that the potential northern HCLE route was not disclosed to homebuyers. K. Jeff Gaudio, Victoria Grove resident, expressed his opposition to the northern HCLE route and his disappointment that this potential route was not disclosed to homebuyers. He also summarized a news article regarding the HCLE alternatives and their potential impacts. L. Scott Reedus, Victoria Grove resident, expressed his opposition to the northern HCLE route and the adverse environmental impact this route would cause, He also stated his belief that the objective should be to build businesses and bring jobs to Riverside County. Tony Shouga, Victoria Grove resident and local business owner, expressed his opposition to western portion of the northern HCLE route and believes the route should continue along Cajalco Road. He also expressed his concern for the adverse environmental impact this route would cause. Chairman Roberts requested Commissioner Lowe, as the CETAP Advisory Chairperson, to provide clarification in light of the comments regarding the HCLE routes. Commissioner Lowe expressed her concurrence with the comments made. She clarified that the northern HCLE route through El Sobrante/Victoria Grove was brought forward by the Federal Agencies, not by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, as an alternative to study. She assured the public that their comments will be considered and staff has not made a recommendation nor has the Commission voted on any routes for the HCLE corridor. N. Borre Winckel, representing the Riverside Chapter of the BIA, stated his belief that the RCIP is a unique document in the way it is integrating land uses and that a county cannot develop in isolation. He expressed the BIA's support for the hybrid alternative, comparing it to the El Toro "Y", a dynamic and job -rich geographic area in Orange County, representing a great development opportunity for Riverside County. There being no further requests to speak on this item, Chairman Roberts closed the public comments. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 11 Commissioner Jim Venable updated the Commission on the status of the widening of ©omenigoni Parkway and Scott Road, indicating that these improvements will adequately connect SR 79 to 1-215. Therefore, he requested clarification as to why Alternatives 7a and 7b are being carried into the Tier 11 document due to the adverse affect on financing for the developers. Cathy Bechtel clarified that if the Commission selects the hybrid alternative as the preferred alternative, it will be the alternative requested for a record of decision. Alternatives 7a and 7b would be removed at that point noting however that the analysis of all the alternatives will be part of the final environmental document. The CETAP Advisory Committee expressed an importance to still consider and study how traffic flow between SR 79 and I-215 with the plans improvements to ensure connectivity between them, excluding Alternatives 7a and 7b. Commissioner Lowe added that the CETAP Advisory Committee did not include Alternatives 7a and 7b in their recommendation and do not intend to continue studying Alternatives 7a and 7b in the Tier 11 process. Commissioner John Tavaglione indicated that communication has been received from Caltrans that Alternatives 7a and 7b are not feasible alternatives and, as a public document, can be made available to developers and lenders, if necessary. Commissioner Buster expressed his concern that moving forward with a recommendation will foreclose options for east -west connector, the future corridor into Orange County, and land use. He believes that each corridor has a substantial transportation impact on the other corridors. Cathy Bechtel responded that at the inception of CETAP, while interrelationships needed to be looked at, the decision was made that each corridor had independent utility. Commissioner Tavaglione expressed his belief that CETAP process is a step process and is moving in the right direction. Commissioner Jack van Haaster requested clarification if, with the approval of the hybrid alternative, there is no longer a need for a north -south corridor. If another corridor is still needed, will that future corridor be part of the existing MSHCP commitment so it will be environmentally covered by the existing effort. Cathy Bechtel responded that staff believes an eastern bypass is still needed but becomes apparent through the CETAP process that it will not occur at this point. However, staff will encourage studies continue to look for additional traffic relief opportunities. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 12 Hideo Sugita said that while partnerships with neighboring county are improving in regards -to bi-county corridors, he believes that decisions that can be made at this point on inter -county corridors should not be delayed. Charles Landry, RC1P Consultant Project Manager, Jacobs Engineering, explained that all CETAP corridors are covered under the MSHCP regardless of what corridor is selected. All arterials in the General Plan are also covered activities under MSHCP. If a route 4s upgraded to a freeway level capacity then there would need to be an amendment to the MSHCP Commissioner Percy Byrd expressed his concern and disappointment for the CETAP process that his believes has not resulted an optimal transportation pattern for the County. Commissioner Daryl Busch expressed his concern that while he supports the hybrid alternative, he believes that the issue has not been fully addressed, causing greater traffic congestion on the 1-215 north of Newport Road. Eric Haley responded that the work on the hybrid alternative will be coordinated with the existing Measure "A" commitments to widen the 1-215 north to Eucalyptus Avenue. Commissioner Ameal Moore stated his support for the hybrid alternative as well as the northern HCLE corridor. In response to Commissioners Venable and Schiffner's request to clearly state the Commission's intent for Alternatives 7a and 7b, Chairman Roberts stated that it is the Commission intent to eliminate Alternatives 7a and 7b from further consideration. Commissioner van Haaster requested an additional to the motion to state that the Commission will commit to the process to identify an additional North -South route. He then accepted Commissioner Lowe's recommendation for making a separate motion for direction to staff to address this issue. M/S/C (Miller/R. Wilson) to: 1) Receive and file the Summary of Comments received on the CETAP Draft EIS/EIRs; 2) Consider the proposal from the Federal Agencies to expeditiously work together towards agreement on a single alternative for each internal CETAP corridor;; 3) Authorize the Chair, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute a Memorandum of Understanding which will outline the funding, • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 13 schedule, data and analyses commitments made between the Federal Agencies, Caltrans, the County, and RCTC; 4) Approve an extended schedule and additional work on the Hemet to CoronalLake Elsinore Corridor; and, 5) Consider selection of the hybrid alternative as the Preferred Alternative for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor, pending final consensus from the Federal Agencies, with the consideration of a connection between State Route 79 and 1-215 in Tier 2 or as part of the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore Corridor study. Nay: Buydos, Byrd MIS/C (Lowe/van Haaster) to direct staff to return to the Commission with discussion of a plan to address the North -South Corridor traffic congestion and future planning. 9. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 10. PRESENTATION - STATE ROUTE 91 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS John Standiford, Director of Public Information, briefly reviewed Orange County Transportation Authority's successful acquisition of the SR 91 Toll Lanes and the potential for Caltrans to now make necessary improvements along this corridor. Chairman Roberts provided a brief report on the first meeting of the Route 91 Advisory Committee. He noted the Committee took action to continue studying the impact of lifting the HOV fee for an additional 60 days due to the possible traffic congestion impact and toll fee increase. Bill Mosby, Caltrans District 8, reviewed the alternatives analysis Gary Slater, Caltrans District 12, reviewed the causes of congestion and resulting delays on SR 91 as well as proposed project as follows: • Add two auxiliary lanes to eastbound SR 91 from SR 241 to SR 71 • Add one HOW in both directions between 1-15 and SR 241 • Add HOV connectors at the 1-15/SR 91 interchange and the SR 91/ SR 241 interchange • Add a freeway to freeway branch connector from SR 91 to SR 71 • Add barrier separated collector distributor or auxiliary lanes from SR 241 to SR 71 • Add one general purpose lane from t-15 to SR 90 Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 14 • Add two auxiliary lanes from SR 71 to SR 241 • Restripe beginning of 2nd HOV lane from Green River to SR 71 to add a lane using existing pavement • Extend westbound SR 91 auxiliary lane at Coal Canyon interchange to the County line. • Construct truck bypass lane at SR 91/SR 55 interchange Park and Ride and Rail Alternatives • In westbound direction, provide part-time HOV usage during non -peak hours from Orange County line to Mary Street in the City of Riverside Anne Mayer indicated full alternative analysis document is available with substantial detail and discussion of the alternatives. 11. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Chairman Roberts noted that the Commissioner Retreat will be he'd on March 21' at the Temecula Creek lnn B. Eric Haley provided a brief update on the recent meetings regarding the State Budget.. 12. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) 1) Names of Parties: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company, Metrolink, RCTC, et al Arbitration No: 72Y 199 108 03 mdsi 2) Names of Parties: "No on 'A', No LA", San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v RCTC, County of Riverside, County Board of Supervisors, and Eric Haley E1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) Significant exposure to litigation to subdivision (b) Number of Potential Cases: 1 • • • • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes February 12, 2003 Page 15 Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54946.8 Negotiating Parties: Property Owner: Riverside County Transportation Commission Buyer: California Department of Transportation Assessor Parcel Numbers: 209-020-046, 209-020-026, 209-020-022, 209-070-014, 206-151-029, 206-151-036, 209-060-022, 209-060-026, 206-132-029, 206-132-030, 210-180-015, 210-180-018, 210.180-031, 210-180-032, 210-180-133, 210-140-066 There were no announcements on the Closed Session items. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting adjourned at 12:35 p.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, March 1 2, 2003, at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Board Room, Riverside, California, 92501. Respectfully submitted, Naty Kopenhaver Clerk of the Board • AGENDA ITEM 5A • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 03-020, "Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, by Eminent Domain, That is Necessary for the Widening, Realignment and Improvement of State Route 74, Between Approximately Dexter Ave., in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Project Segments 1 & 2)" STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity; 2 Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240,410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain. v. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and,. 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-020, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside 1 County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS: 349-060- 015, 349-342-011, 349-342-005, 349-342-004, 349-341-001, 345- 220-065, 345-220-032, 345-220-034, 345-200-005, 345-160-048, 345-150-006, 345-150-007, 345-150-004, 345-150-012, 345-150- 001, 345-070-010, 345-070-020, 345-070-011, 345-060-040, 345- 060-041, 345-060-049, 345-060-046, 345-060-045, 345-100-001, 345-050-016, 345-090-007, 345-090-010, 345-090-011, 345-080- 047, 342-210-036, 342-210-021, 342-210-033, 342-210-031, 342- 210-039, 342-210-024, 342-120-013, 342-210-028, 342-120-041, 342-200-035, 342-200-034, 342-130-002, 342-150-010, 342-140- 008, 342-100-047, 342-100-024, 342-100-023, 342-100-044, 342- 052-002 & 342-092-027 & 342-052-023, 342-052-006, 342-052- 007, 342-052-008, 342-052-010, 342-052-017, 342-051-009 thru 012, 342-051-017, 342-064-008, 342-064-007, 342-064-008 & 009, 342-061-006, 342-062-003, 342-071-003, 342-072-003, 342- 071-005, 342-071-006, 342-072-010, 342-040-030 342-072-022 & 023, 326-250-026, 326-240-024, 326-240-031, 326-240-023, 326-240-021, 342-071-007, 326-234-002, 342-072-011, 342-072- 024 (Project Parcel Nos. 13573-1, 13625-1, 13631-1, 13632-1, 13637-1 ,13639-1, 13644-1, -2, 13648-1, 13662-1, 13665-1, 136674, 13668-1, 13670-1, 136764, 13677-1, 13682-1, 13690-1, -2, 13692-1, 13696-1, 13697-1, -2, 13700-1, 13704-1, 13705-1, 13706-1, 13709-1, 13713-1, 13716-1, -2, 13721-1, -2, 13726-1, 13751-1, -2, 13754-1, -2, 13756-1, -2, 13757-1, -2, -3, 13759-1, - 2, 13761-1, 13770-1, -2, 13771-1, -2, -3, 13773-1, -2, 13776-1, -2, 13777-1, -2, -3, 13778-1, -2, 13795-1, 13797-1, 13809-1, -2, 13810-1, -2, 13811-1, -2, 13812-1, -2, -3, 13816-1, 13820-1, 13821-1, 13822-1, 13824-1, 13833-1, -2, 13834-1, 13839-1, 13845-1, 13846-1, 13849-1, 13855-1, 13863-1, 13866-1, -2, 13867-1, 13868-1, -2, 13876-1, -2, 13878-1, 13879-1, -2, 13889- 1, 13896-1, 13897-1, 13898-1, 13901-1, 13906-1, -2, 18971-1, 19752-1, -2, and 19753-1, -2), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Widening, Realignment, and Improvement of State Route 74, Between Approximately Dexter Avenue, in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Project Segments 7 & 2)." BACKGROUND: The State Route 74 Realignment project is a Measure "A" project from Dexter Avenue in the City of Lake Elsinore to 7"' Street in the City of Perris. The project will be constructed in two segments. Segment 1 is from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to approximately 1640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road. Segment 2 is from approximately 1640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road to 71h Street in Perris. • 2 • • • The County of Riverside Real Property Department is acting as right-of-way acquisition agent for the Commission in the acquisition of the parcels. Offers of just compensation to purchase the parcels described in RON 03-020 were prepared and initially presented to the property owners of record by letters between April 24, 2002 and January 10, 2003. The offers have not been accepted to date, however negotiations are ongoing and will continue. The holding of the hearing or the Commission's approval of a resolution of necessity does not preclude the continuation of negotiations with the property owners. It may be necessary to acquire some or all of the parcels described in Exhibit "A" by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is the approval of a resolution of necessity. Prior to approving a resolution of necessity (RON), the Commission must give each person whose property is to be acquired, and whose name and address appears on the last equalized County Tax Assessor's roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on: Whether the public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. Whether the proposed project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; Whether the acquisition of the real property is necessary for the project; 4. Whether portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain; and 5. Whether the required offers to acquire the real property have been made. Note: The fair market value of the property is not an issue at the hearing, The notice must be mailed by first class mail and state the intent of the Commission to consider the approval of the resolution, the right of each person to appear and be heard on these issues, and that the failure to file a written request to appear will result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission must then hold a hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed may appear and be heard. The required notice was mailed to the property owners, identified in Exhibit "A" of RON 03-020, on February 25, 2003. DISCUSSION: The following addresses the findings that are required for approval of the resolution of necessity: ) THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE PROPOSED PROJECT State Route 74 between Lake Elsinore and Perris is an older highway, which does not meet current design standards. Many of the horizontal and vertical curves along this route do not meet passing and stopping sight distance standards. Safe passing distances through this 8.5 mile section are limited to 9 locations, constituting approximately one-half of the length. Left turns to private driveways and cross streets causes queuing of traffic in one direction until opposing traffic has passed. Shoulders are substandard and mostly unpaved, varying in width from 2 feet to 10 feet. The angle of intersection of the majority of the cross streets does not meet Caltrans or County standards. With increased traffic volumes over the past several years, safety has become a primary concern along this section of State Route 74. According to Caltrans records, over the last ten years there have been 39 fatalities and 716 injuries. A significant amount of public support for this project has been evident at RCTC Commission meetings and has resulted in the acceleration of the implementation of the SR 74 widening project from 1-15 in Lake Elsinore to 7ih Street in Perris. As a result of this public input, at the September 8, 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission established an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Commissioners Gene Bourbonnais, Al Landers, Tom Mullen, and Kevin Pape to expedite improvement to SR 74. The Committee met on September 17, 1999 and reviewed project status for both the Measure "A" State Route 74 improvement project and the various Caltrans SHOPP (State Highway Operations and Protection Program) projects. The meeting was also attended by members of the public that are interested in accelerating improvements to this segment of SR 74. • 4 • • • After consideration of the information presented, the Committee members were unanimous in their desire to recommend to the Commission that it assist Caltrans with delivering the remainder of the Caltrans SHOPP projects combined with the Measure "A" improvement project within the limits of 1-15 and 7th Street on SR 74 with the intent of accelerating the construction of all improvements.. At its October 13, 1999 meeting, the SR 74 project was accelerated via approval of Agenda Item No. 9. (2) THE PROJECT IS PLANNED OR LOCATED IN A MANNER THAT WILL BE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH THE GREATEST PUBLIC GOOD AND THE LEAST PRIVATE INJURY The roadway realignment follows the existing alignment as much as practical. New realignment was necessary to meet current design standards. The project has been designed in such a manner as to create the optimum benefit to the existing community while requiring the least amount of property take. (3) THE ACQUISITION ❑F THE PARCELS ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT The acquisition of parcels identified in RON 03-020 is required in order to provide the wider road and to conform to current horizontal and vertical design standards. Consideration was also provided to limiting the impact on adjacent properties. (4) PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY MAY BE ACQUIRED BY EMINENT DOMAIN AS REMNANTS The list of parcels that include uneconomic remnants is attached as Page 1 of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-020. The legal descriptions of the real property that the Commission is seeking to acquire are attached to the proposed Resolution of Necessity as Exhibit "A". For the parcels identified in Exhibit "B" of RON 03-020, a substantial portion of the property is being acquired because it is necessary for the widening and re -alignment of Highway 74. The remainders of those parcel's are being acquired on the grounds that they are remnant parcels. Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410 authorizes a public agency to acquire a remnant parcel, even though it is not necessary for the proposed project, and subsection (a) of Section 1240.410 defines a "remnant" as a "remainder or portion thereof that will be left in such size, shape, or condition as to be of little market value." 5 At the time the parcels described in the proposed Resolution of Necessity were appraised by the Commission's appraisers, Robert S. Perdue and Sydney H. Hawran, Mr, Perdue and Ms.. Hawran concluded that those remainder parcels were remnants, as defined in Section 1240.410. In order to distinguish what property the Commission is acquiring based on public use and necessity and what portion is an uneconomic remnant, two metes and bounds descriptions are provided. Page 1 of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-020 identifies the parcels that include uneconomic remnants. The rest of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-020 provides the legal descriptions of the portions of those parcels identified on page 1 of Exhibit "B" that the Commission is acquiring for public use and necessity and the widening and re -alignment of State Route 74 (the project). Exhibit "A" to RON 03-020 provides the complete description of all of the parcels to be acquired, including the uneconomic remnants. Commission staff has not obtained a separate metes and bounds legal description of the uneconomic remnants. The remnants would constitute those portions of the parcels identified on page 1 of Exhibit "B" that are not described in the legal descriptions that follow in Exhibit "B" (5) THE OFFERS OF JUST COMPENSATION HAVE BEEN MADE Appraisals were prepared by Robert Shea Perdue & Associates and ❑onahue & Company to establish the fair market value of the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty that ROTC is seeking to acquire. The Commission reviewed the results of the original appraisals at the October 29, 2001, January 28, 2002, May 8, 2002, July 10, 2002, and April 10, 2002 Commission meetings. The Commission directed staff to transmit the approved offers of just compensation to the property owners. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty as established by the approved appraisals and as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible for the property cited above, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty through eminent domain to ensure that access and the necessary property rights will be available to meet the critical time frames associated with the development of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no new fiscal impact from this action. The Commission approved the current budget for the subject State Route 74 Widening Project at the May 8. 2002 Commission meeting. • 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Commission: (1) Received a Negative Declaration/Finding of No Significance (ND/F0NSl), which was approved by Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on July 25, 1994; and, (2) Prepared an Environmental Re-evaluation, because of the passage of time, which determined that a Supplemental ND/FONSI was not required and was approved by Caltrans and FHWA on October 20, 2000 and updated in June 2002, to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environment& Policy Act (NEPA). NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The notice of this public hearing was mailed on February 25, 2003 (more than 15 days prior to meeting) to each property owner of record. Attachments:. 1, Table 1 "Highway 74 Condemnation Parcels" March 12, 2003 2. Project Map 3. Resolution of Necessity No. 03-020 • • STATE ROUTE 74 CONDEMNATION PARCELS MARCH 12, 2003 CPN APN's GRANTOR ACTIVITY 13573-1 349-060-015 M-Sefan Tinsley FEE 13625-1 349-342-011 James Kirk Harns FEE 13631-1 349-342-005 Dao Anh Hoa FEE 13632-1 349-342-004 Dao Anh Hoa FEE 13637-1 349-341-001 Luz Pantoja, et_ al. FEE 13639-1 345-220-065 Jose Luis Espinoza, et. ux. FEE 13644-1, -2 345-220-032 Jose Garcia, et. ux. FEE + TCE 13648-1 345-220-034 Jose Garcia, et. ux. FEE 13662-1 345-200-005 Kenneth Paul James FEE 13665-1 345-160-048 M. V. Duffy JameslGritton FEE 13667-1 345-150-006 Deirdre Gough, Trustee FEE 13668-1 345-150-007 Hampton Deslonde, et. ux. FEE 13670-1 345-150-004 Kenneth Paul James FEE 13676-1 345-150-012 Roberto Esparza Sanches, et. al FEE 13677-1 345-150-001 Ironclad, L.L.C. FEE 13682-1 345-070-010 Ironclad, L.L.C. FEE 13690-1, -2 345-070-020 1 Prime Corners L.P. FEE + TCE 13692-1 345-070-011 Sylvette J. Bankston FEE 13696-1 345-060-040 Arebelle Allison Full FEE 13697-1, -2 345-060-041 Arebelle Allison FEE + TCE 13700-1 345-060-049 Eleanor J. Smith FEE 13704-1 345-060-046 Manuel Ortiz, et. ux. FEE 13705-1 345-060-045 Robert Ramos, et. ux. FEE 13706-1 345-100-001 Bessie Ann Watkins FEE 13709-1 345-050-016 Della Robinson FEE 13713-1 345-090-007 Will Fenner, et.al. FEE 13716-1, -2 - 345-090-010 Lila A. Ashley FEE + TCE 13721-1, -2 345-090-011 Lila A. Ashley FEE + TCE 13726-1 345-080-047 John Silas, et. ux. FEE 13751-1, -2 342-210-036 Robert Loucel Aguilar FEE + TCE 13754-1, -2 342-210-021 Ronald R. Block, et. ux. FEE + TCE 13756-1, 2 342-210-033 Hideaka Nakamura, Trustee FEE + TCE 13757-1, -2, -3 342-210-031 Alfonso Siordia, et. ux. FEE + TCE 13759-1, -2 342-210-039 Christopher N. Towner FEE + TCE 13761-1 342-210-024 Arthuro J. GaJvan FEE 13770-1, -2 342-120-013 Raychel W. Bragg, et. al. FEE + TCE 13771-1, 2, 3 - 342-210-028 Norma D. Ryder, et. al. Full FEE 13773-1, -2 342-120-041 Cleo & Betty L. Owen FEE + TCE 13776-1, -2 342-200-035 Louis Lee Haywood, et. FEE + TCE 13777-1, -2, -3 342-200-034 Jerry Austin, et. ux and Joe Bird° et. ux FEE + TCE 13778-1, -2 342-130-002 Alexander Paul, et. ux. FEE + TCE 13795-1 342-150-010 Willie k Jones FEE 13797-1 342-140-008 Raul C. Gonzales FEE 13809-1, -2 342-100-047 Dennis K. Woodland, et. ux 1 FEE + TCE 13810-1, -2 342-100-024 Loren B. Joplin FEE + TCE 13811-1, -2 342-100-023 Loren B. Joplin FEE + TCE 13812-1, -2, -3 342-100-044 William & Lawrence Daigle FEE + TCE 8 • • 13816-1 342-052-002 342-092-027 342-052-023 Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church FEE 13820-1 342-052-006 _ Antonio M. Ayala, et. ux. FEE 13821-1 342-052-007 Salvador Gonzalez FEE 13822-1 342-052-008 Antonio M. Ayala, et. ux. FEE 13824-1 342-052-010 Jeffery Harris FEE 13833-1, -2 342-052-017 Robert L. Harden, Jr. FEE + TCE 13834-1 342-051-009 thru 012 Manh Van Luonq & Ngat Thi Le FEE 13839-1 342-051-017 Roberto Fernandez, et. al. FEE 13845-1 342-064-008 342-064-009 Alberto Perez FEE 13846-1 342-064-007 Beatrice Brown FEE 13849-1 342-061-006 Rafael Vasquez, et. al FEE 13855-1 342-062-003 Alejandro Munoz, et. ux. FEE 13863-1 342-071-003 Clyde Pope FEE 13866-1, -2 342-072-003 Jose L. Villalobos, et. ux. FEE + TCE 13867-1 342-071-005 Clyde Pope FEE 13868-1, -2 342-071-006 Josie S. Lopez FEE +TCE 13876-1, -2 342-072-010 Earl Jones, Trustee FEE + TCE 13878-1 342-040-030 Ral h Talie , et. al, Full FEE 13879-1, -2 342-072-022 342-072-023 Richard Atencio, et. al. 1 FEE + TCE 13889-1 326-250-026 Joe L. & Veria L. Williams FEE 13896-1 326-240-024 Ethel May Hatcher FEE 13897-1 326-240-031 lanthe M. Roberson Bentley -Johnson FEE 13898-1 326-240-023 Dorothy Hall FEE 13901-1 326-240-021 Leopoldina Molina FEE 13906-1, -2 342-071-007 _ Valerie F. Ross FEE + TCE 18971-1 326-234-002 - Henry Combs, Trustee FEE 19752-1, -2 342-072-011 Elijah Lewis FEE + TCE 19753-1, -2 342-072-024 Steven Atencio, et. al. FEE + TCE 9 • PROJECT MAP • 10 • INOE% OF SHEETS RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY (MARCH 12, 2003 S • STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATION PROJECT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY NEAR PERRIS FROM 0 .5 KM EAST OF WASSON CANYON ROAD TO 7TH STREET Tv 44 a71C44WI7• a by S7 9n944 0 Plen a 011ra a .4, 70 y, 1499 5R 74 PARCELS - RESOLUTION OP NECESSITY _. 110 3904 !1!x'04 - - 911441790 1$11.1 Mt -1440911 •34a re, 11.144 2 13413.1 .1.142-011 4... aim I.. 3 13431-I 3.11 -114-901 gee 1.1 Ilal 3412.1 4 4. 3.2 404 0m 4 34 Its. 1 xx31. 1 3w.v.,-0.1 to.01++ 41.. 4 441. • _ 13434 tl 14 1.44 .443 .la. 4494 41011114. i4'. -. 1 -01441-1,4 141-220431 4a.. L.41., .1. w 5 !3411-r 714.270 -411 x.. L>. IC n. 4 I Sant• 1 141. 1901141 teens ., F41µ 434.. 4 13143.1 3s1 -110-w1 EL 3. 00,3 4111401440• . 1 § 134 41.1 HS. k20 4,0% Wirer. 49.44. Tr... 11 13{{1-1 041. 119-144 1 1.41..4. .• 1.. 13 . 131144. 1 444-1*o-04 . 441.1, Fan 414 17 3, ,, ,: 34 14.1 344.160.013 a m.... 2. 311. 3414x4. 11. el J 13 13031.4 141- IS24:01 a .1m. L. S. C- 3.3.010-9, 0 Ir9.4 l,t, L.L.C. t 2 13410.1,1 341.474 -420 711.. . 1v+r. LT. i0 43411.1 341. 079. 011 441 114 4. a.wnv1 F6 13414..1 341-444-014 4140.11. 4113. 01 34 21 13441. 1,1 311.040-411 44' 01115 4 11180n 44X40.1 314.040.044 Ele ..r 4, 011.0 23 _ 41. 044 .444 a..„01 trr . ,a _13704.1 43101., 047-040.4.1 A... ll .. •• let. 14 _ 13304-1 )4 4•.04. .041 1..e ls 4m ea .,. 00 00 - 44 1310 1-e 743-940. 911 0.1,1411X.. 04 2< 11111.4 3. 3.050.107 Ent /r4.... .... .. 1 e4v 74 PARCELS - RL504.UTICN OE NECESSITY 7911 144 14114.1. 2 3144190.04 14111. 1.2 444 4-4 11 LI le L 4aprr2 112119.1 144 -p4 -pr 13111.1.1 143.11644 11114.1 144;10.441 13114.1 041. 110-411 43151.1.3, 1 141.310401 4311.1.1 311-410 11114.1 ,1 12-3,0.0 4 13114. 1. -3 442-111. 114 arysa1 4. 449 4. e t. 41. 13111.1,2,3 344.413404 13411.1, •3 742.430.0 11 Cl. i le ft/ L. 9 ... 43414.1. .4 042-10 4.413 4414 1.4 030411, 44. 11114.1,2,7 NT -100.6-3! .4.•r, 1.04141, e l. ,0 45 4 40 11r . 41. 01 1317441, -3 413-130.002 AF.. .144. P4u1. 47, .4. 14 11 4en, 2lt... 415..e. 44.404 444111 4 _11 C 6140 / .4 4 44.... *4 114.rd 77,.114 1134,4. 11.r p1., 44. un prlsl44rr arm., 2. 947..4 43 N2-144.410 41111. L J.T . 13147.1 044 ..440- 441 13011.1. •4 314-.100.941 04 .., 1♦ 4. 4.1®6 1. 01. . 4. N. 13414-4, -2 144.100. 004 Lar en 4, Je er 1n 411111-1, -2 140-130.031 13112-1,2.3 444-144-341 1" l141� r Lo-n.r 11. 0..p 1. 13.14-1 14202.4 04 3239- 413-012-631 412-052-001 13411. 1 142-0 51.411 .1 .1 C. den.1 14 4 14 Le e. 4. ...11.4 11 02 14 142.431.044 344-102-410 A EFE9-11.. .rl. 05..31 11.14 90.13.1..1.± 44 14r.r1 Ct.r.1 . w 4 r4 1t 4,. w. 10 1,. e ge 10 40. ,1. , M .4.1t. IL A,0 *., et. ut LCCATEON WP 5R 74 PARCELS - RESOLUTION OP NECESSITY Iq 3741 ON CRANT{3R 43 13431.1 .1 142-04.1-01! 11.err t- ..111 . 'I •. H 1/434.1 111.001.094 04'4 412 ....., awl ('4* 1 44 .1 In 14 1/434.1 3.1-411-011 .01.4 4 11.^m ..lw4, e4 . 41 - IA 11112-I 044.044. 904 .100r5 •O-. , 41 131 44-1 444.411-4 41 1102. 4. .1-0., IA 11444-1 3414311-0121 114 4014 44.+1. •. . 4 4. 144/1.1 104 412-Dc1 ..14.41r. 44..4 44. .. 4. 414. - 4a 13043.1 341--411-001 _ 111 94 /M. - - - it 11144 -1,4 311. 411.001 4. . r. . L. 4111*1 00 0, 0 •• 42 -y.2-444-001 CI 4e1 44 04 43 _13047-1 114441 ,3 14.011.4 04 Jae 1e 1. l am e M 1)474-1,4 042.012-414 EFr1 5we , 1, 1,4741 44 13414.1 x3.040 .010 4.140 Tel:sy, 44. 49. N 14414-1,1 M2 -042-w 1 4.23 41-01 .14 4*e.mta. 44, . 43 93445.4 *4.1.0 .441 ..e 1.. 1 1411 4 C. 411110* iA 11444.1 124.14 0.044 Ethel /•17 Neter.r. N 11047-1 1k4 .440.4.31 i. e. 0. 014.1 '... /1194.4314-0 414 11 134..•I 311.24 0-421 Dere rry 0 4!1. . 4 4 11101-1 U. -T.4 -W; .-0..1410 ..11114 11 41204.9.1 444-441.04 VW.. 14 7. 4.. . !1 14411.1 311.414.001 11..-7 4N04, 7 +... 0 11 14351-I.2 341.411.40 1111., 41+4. 11 15111-1, 2 311.472-411 11... 14 43-00 re . ... et. • sE aTO 0199 4ep 44411 0414 RIYERS I07 COUNTY T RANS07RI A71ON CC 1115S1o11 2047 L411O44 ST, 340 FLOOR 27*$u 41I t)E, 92501 57 ENGI N7ER1140 1.311 441.147A.N14 AVE 141I FE 141 1719MILLE , 74 42012 C onTro ct N o. RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY NO. 03-020 "A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DECLARING THAT THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE REALTY IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APNS 349-060-015, 349-342-011, 349-342-005, 349-342-004, 349-341- 001, 345-220-065, 345-220-032, 345-220-034, 345-200-005, 345- 160-048, 345-150-006, 345-150-007, 345-150-004, 345-150-012, 345-150-001, 345-070-010, 345-070-020, 345-070-011, 345-060- 040, 345-060-041, 345-060-049, 345-060-046, 345-060-045, 345- 100-001, 345-050-016, 345-090-007, 345-090-010, 345-090-011, 345-080-047, 342-210-036, 342-210-021, 342-210-033, 342-210- 031, 342-210-039, 342-210-024, 342-120-013, 342-210-028, 342- 120-041, 342-200-035, 342-200-034, 342-130-002, 342-150-010, 342-140-008, 342-100-047, 342-100-024, 342-100-023, 342-100- 044, 342-052-002, 342-092-027, 342-052-023, 342-052-006, 342- 052-007, 342-052-008, 342-052-010, 342-052-017, 342-051-009, 10, 11 & 12, 342-051-017, 342-064-008 & 09, 342-064-007, 342- 061-006, 342-062-003, 342-071-003, 342-072-003, 342-071-005, 342-071-006, 342-072-010, 342-040-030, 342-072-022 & 023, 326-250-026, 326-240-024, 326-240-031, 326-240-023, 326-240- 021, 342-071-007, 326-234-002, 342-072-011, 342-072-024 (PROJECT PARCEL NOS. 13573-1, 13625-1, 13631-1, 13632-1, 13637-1 ,13639-1, 13644-1, 13644-2, 13648-1, 13662-1, 13665-1. 13667-1, 13668-1, 13670-1, 13676-1, 13677-1, 13682-1, 13690-1, 13690-2, 13692-1, 13696-1, 13697-1, 13697-2, 13700-1, 13704-1, 13705-1, 13706-1, 13709-1, 13713-1, 13716-1, 13716-2, 13721-1, 13721-2, 13726-1, 13751-1, 13751-2, 13754-1, 13754-2, 13756-1, 13756-2, 13757-1, 13757-2, 13757-3, 13759-1, 13759-2, 13761-1, 13770-1, 13770-2, 13771-1, 13771-2, 13771-3, 13773-1, 13773-2, 13776-1, 13776-2, 13777-1, 13777-2, 13777-3, 13778-1, 13778-2, 13795-1, 13797-1, 13809-1, 13809-2, 13810-1, 13810-2, 13811-1, 13811-2, 13812-1, 13812-2, 13812-3, 13816-1, 13820-1, 13821-1, 13822-1, 13824-1, 13833-1, 13833-2, 13834-1, 13839-1, 13845-1, 13846-1, 13849-1, 13855-1, 13863-1, 13866-1, 13866-2, 13867-1, 13868-1, 13868-2, 13876-1, 13876-2, 13878-1, 13879-1, 13879-2, 13889-1, 13896-1, 13897-1, 13898-1, 13901-1, 13906-1, 13906-2, 18971-1, 19752-1, 19752-2, 19753-1 AND 19753-2), BY EMINENT DOMAIN IS NECESSARY FOR THE WIDENING, REALIGNMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 74, BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY DEXTER AVE., IN LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, TO 7th STREET, IN PERRIS, CALIFORNIA (PROJECT SEGMENTS 1 & 2)" • • • 12 • • • WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the .realty in certain real property, located in Lake Elsinore and Perris, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 349-060-01 5, 349- 342-011, 349-342-005, 349-342-004, 349-341-001, 345-220-065, 345-220- 032, 345-220-034, 345-200-005, 345-160-048, 345-150-006, 345-150-007, 345-150-004, 345-150-012, 345-150-001, 345-070-010, 345-070-020, 345- 070-011, 345-060-040, 345-060-041, 345-060-049, 345-060-046, 345-060- 045, 345-100-001, 345-050-016, 345-090-007, 345-090-010, 345-090-01 1, 345-080-047, 342-210-036, 342-210-021, 342-210-033, 342-210-031, 342- 210-039, 342-210-024, 342-120-013, 342-210-028, 342-120-041, 342-200- 035, 342-200-034, 342-130-002, 342-150-010, 342-140-008, 342-100-047, 342-100-024, 342-100-023, 342-100-044, 342-052-002, 342-092-027, 342- 052-023, 342-052-006, 342-052-007, 342-052-008, 342-052-010, 342-052- 017, 342-051-009, 10, 11 & 12, 342-051-017, 342-064-008 & 09, 342-064- 007, 342-061-006, 342-062-003, 342-071-003, 342-072-003, 342-071-005, 342-071-006, 342-072-010, 342-040-030, 342-072-022 & 023, 326-250-026, 326-240-024, 326-240-031, 326-240-023, 326-240-021, 342-071-007, 326- 234-002, 342-072-011, 342-072-024 (Project Parcel Nos. 1 3573-1, 13625-1, 13631-1, 13632-1, 13637-1 ,13639-1, 13644-1, 13644-2, 13648-1, 13662-1, 13665-1, 13667-1, 13668-1, 13670-1, 13676-1, 13677-1, 13682-1, 13690-1, 13690-2, 13692-1, 13696-1, 13697-1, 13697-2, 13700-1, 13704-1, 13705-1, 13706-1, 13709-1, 13713-1, 13716-1, 13716-2, 13721-1, 13721-2, 13726-1, 13751-1, 13751-2, 13754-1, 13754-2, 13756-1, 13756-2, 13757-1, 13757-2, 13757-3, 13759-1, 13759-2, 13761-1, 13770-1, 13770-2, 13771-1, 13771-2, 13771-3, 13773-1, 13773-2, 13776-1, 13776-2, 13777-1, 13777-2, 13777-3, 13778-1, 13778-2, 13795-1, 13797-1, 13809-1, 13809-2, 13810-1, 13810-2, 1 381 1-1 , 13811-2, 13812-1, 13812-2, 13812-3, 13816-1, 13820-1, 13821-1, 13822-1, 13824-1, 13833-1, 13833-2, 13834-1, 13839-1, 13845-1, 13846-1, 13849-1, 13855-1, 13863-1, 13866-1, 13866-2, 13867-1, 13868-1, 13868-2, 13876-1, 13876-2, 13878-1, 13879-1, 13879-2, 13889-1, 13896-1, 13897-1, 13898-1, 13901-1, 13906-1, 13906-2, 18971-1, 19752-1, 19752-2, 19753-1 and 19753-2), for purposes of the widening, realignment, and improvement of State Route 74, between approximately Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7`' Street, in Perris, California (Project Segments 1 & 2), pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 9:00 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address 13 appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission and each person whose property is to be acquired by eminent domain was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission is specifically authorized, by section 1240.410 of the California code of Civil Procedure, to acquire remnant parcels by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now approve a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for which the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty are to be acquired is for of the widening, realignment, and improvement of State Route 74, between approximately Dexter Ave., in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7"' Street, in Perris, California (Project Segments 1 & 2), pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 13©220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire by eminent domain property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal descriptions, plats and description of the real property and improvements to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; • • • 14 • • (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) Portions of the property described in Exhibit "A" are necessary for the proposed project, and those portions are described in Exhibit Bp.; (d) The remainders of the parcels described in Exhibit "A," after separating out those portions described in Exhibit "B," are remnant parcels as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410; and (e) Pursuant to section 1245.230(c)(4) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, that either the offers required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code have been made to the owners or owners of record, or the offers have not been made because the owners cannot be located with reasonable diligence. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably interfering with Existing Public Use's).. Some or all of the real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights -of -way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights -of -way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the real property being acquired that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. 15 Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the herein above described real property and improvements in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property and improvements at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property and improvements that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property and improvements. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation of the project for which the real property and improvements are being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 121'day of March, 2003 Ron Roberts, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • 16 • • • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATS OF REAL PROPERTY SEEKING TO ACQUIRE 17 • • Definitions of Legal Rights to be Acquired "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, refers to complete or absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement," refers to the right of plaintiff, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project as referred to in the complaint, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Prior to termination of this easement, property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, nor shall property owners plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of plaintiff. Plaintiff shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time as plaintiff determines in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation to property owners. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under, or over this easement without obtaining the prior written consent of plaintiff_ The duration of the rights under this easement shall not be for less than twenty four (24) months from the commencement of construction on the applicable parcel and not more than thirty (30) months of the date possession of the applicable parcel as authorized by court order. RVf J l 5KAR\611131 EXHIBIT A PAGE_._ EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, shown on a Record of Survey on file in Book 17, Page 13 of Records of Survey on file in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the center quarter section line with the southeasterly line of State Highway No. 395 (30.00 feet half -width) [9.144 meters] as shown on said Record of Survey, also known as State Highway 74, said point being the northeasterly corner of land described in a Document in favor of Leona Jackson, recorded February 10, 1984, as Instrument No. 28246 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said southeasterly line being the northwesterly line of said land, said southeasterly line also being a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 882.292 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 250 44' 20" East; thence southwesterly along said curve and said southeasterly and northwesterly line through a central angle of 02° 12' 26" an arc length of 33.987 meters to the northwesterly corner of said land, said northwesterly corner being (he northeasterly corner of land conveyed to Pat Gilboy as described in a Grant Deed recorded March 2, 1980, as Instrument No. 40860 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southerly along the westerly line of said land described in a Document in favor of Leona Jackson, also being the easterly line of said land conveyed to Pat Gilboy, South 000 12' 52" East, 3.768 meters; thence North 67° 06' 12" East, 33.443 meters to a point on said center quarter section line, said line also being the easterly line of said land described in a Document in favor of Leona Jackson, said point being distant southerly thereon, South 000 48' 24" West, 4.923 meters from said first mentioned point of intersection; thence northerly along said center quarter section line and said last mention easterly line, North 000 46' 24" East, 4.923 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 130.0 square meters. TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010548 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-32.2-13573 (13573-1) This real property description has beer. prepar me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Prole iona Land Surve Signature Date: KI, L.S. 4430 LICE EX I TIRES $130101 //, /&)L` s 2 • • • PARCEL 25 R,S4 24/77 P RCEL 26 Associated Engineers, kic. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARio, CA 9c76,1 TEL (99091 98o-1982 FAX* no% 911-98,1 COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 6100'48'24"E 4.923 n SHEET I OF G SCALD 1'5'00 CENTER I% SECTION LINE SEC, 21 135T3 PLY LINE INST, NO. 28246, O.R. RECOROEL1 FEEL 10,1984 RrSJ J7/J3 E'LY LINE UST. NO. 40860, 0.R. RECORDED MAR. 3,19130 1Y1 Y LINE INST. NO. 28246, 0.R. RECORDED FEES. 10, 1984 SOO' 12'52'S 3.768 an Plain Nu 13574-4 SOUTARE FEET. 1.399 cili140C ifcr+rnt. l t fl E 1/2. SE 1/4. SW 14, SEC. 21, T.5S., RAW., S.B.M. Re y 16/0 1 THE BEARINGS AND INSTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. 101E 6. IAIJLTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010548 TO OBTAIN GROIJNO LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13573-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 23 as shown an the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 23, said corner being on'the easterly line of Greenwald Avenue, formerly known as Brown Street, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said map; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 23, South 89° 23' 20" East, 10.471 meters; thence South 200 08' 36" West, 31.845 meters to paint on said easterly line of Greenwald Avenue, said easterly line being the westerly line of said Lot 23; thence northerly along said easterly and westerly line, North 00° 56' 48" East, 30.013 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 157.1 square meters (1691 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Greenwald Avenue). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply all distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-33.6-13625 (13625-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signat Date ls' 5.4430 CENSE EXPIRES 9/30/01 µ:l9 APP 1G OEED \i3 7S.x CAS 4 *Y SCALE( 11500 AlEADOWBRODK AVE DISTRICT / J PUB RIMY coR 1---- LOT 23 Stiff 4, stkfm 001 1n w ac, m Q Y wf wm oo mm - 1 Associated Engineers, ho. 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9FT64 TEL. (909) 940-1982 FAXi 190919.1E-0891 COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST r 1 LOT J1 ,/ LOT 4g 1 1 1 f 1 1 E L7 r LOT 23 - PROGRESSIVE SUaJJ VJSJcN ME3 I6/56 LOT 24 PARCEL Ho 13625-I SWAM FEETi 1691 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1953. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13625-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION UN RAW IfF'TrRC. Ic7J EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lots 5, 6 and 7 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in 3ook 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwesterly corner of Lot 4 as shown on said map, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Route 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said map; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lots 4 and 5, South 20° 39' 38" West, 42.210 meters to a point of intersection with the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 52 as shown on said map, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence easterly along said westerly prolongation, South 89° 24' 46" East, 14.277 meters; thence South 20° 08' 36" West, 42.030 meters to point on the westerly prolongation of the southerly line of said Lot 52, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89°24'27" East, 14.680 meters from a point of intersection with said southeasterly line of State Route 74; thence westerly along said last mentioned westerly prolongation, North .890 24' 27" West, 14.680 meters to said last mentioned point of intersection; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lots 5, 6 and 7, North 20" 39' 38" East, 42.165 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 573.4 square meters (6172 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-33.8-13631 (13631-1) This real property • escriptio has been • repar- irb e, or under my direction, in conformance w` t ' e Prof an ry - • s Signature Date: r� 4` , • I31OR I, L.S. 4430 LICE EXPIRES 9/30/01 ‘/1(E 4/1 f� % NO.4430 Exp. 09/30/0 6 04A99,—WOPPOPADEB,5+sx.3c-Doe SCALES Is 500 LOT 176 Associated sneer+, Inc. 335 EAST SFELBY STREET ONTARIO: CA 91764 TEL- MOM 980-1952 FAXi (9095 4V-0591 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST / c / LOT 52 / LOT 6 PROGRSSIVE / / S UAIJ 1 V 1 S] DN / ma J6/56 r 1 LOT 53 OLONGATION OF WLY LINE LOT 52 • TY PROLONGATION OF S'LY LPL LOT 52 LOT 51 PARCEL No i 1363H =ABE FEET' 6172 THE BEARINGS AND DM -TAKES SHOWN ARE BAS ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF I9$ ZONE 6. IAJLTFLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L000f TO OBTAWI GROUI4 LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 1362*1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lots 4 and 5 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 4, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Route 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said map; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 4, South 89°23'56" East, 18.586 meters; thence South 62°12'31" West, 6.632 meters; thence South 20°08'36" West, 38.723 meters to point on the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 52 as shown on said map, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89°24'46" East, 14.277 meters from the point of intersection with said southeasterly line of State Route 74; thence westerly along said westerly prolongation, North 89°24'46" West, 14.277 meters to said point of intersection; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lots 4 and 5, North 20'39'38" East, 42.210 meters to said POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 565.4 square meters (6086 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distance& 08-R1V-74-33.9-13632 (13632-1) This real property description has been prepared by • e, or under my direction, in conformance with Professio Land urveyo Signature Date: IMtgl i, L.S. 4430 ES 9/30/01 NO. 4430 Exp. 09/30/01 8 µ=V992]aV+M�'INGNPEX YA13612_ G[ SCALE( 1.500 LOT 176 N89'24'469T Kin o9 33 589'23'S6"E 1H.586 m P08 H14'LY COR OF LOT 4 LOT 6 1 I / 1 J Lik Associated Engineers„ Inc. 33I EAST SNEL9Y STREET OHTARIO,CA 9(161 TEL. (909) 9604982 FAX, (9091941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 562' 6.632 m 1 1 / / / 1 1 / / LOT 52 PARCEL Ho: 13632-1 SQUARE DTI 60116 LEGAL DESC-1I-PT I ON LOT 2 N'LY I1& LOT 4 LOT 53 PROGRESS I V.E SU.In l VI S I ON MB ! 6./56 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASES ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE' SYSTEM .OF 1963. ZONE 6. UTATU'LY :DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES.. PARCPJ.. 13632.1 SKETCH TO --ACCOMPANY • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 176 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 176, said corner being the point of intersection of the northerly line of Section 22, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian with the northwesterly line of State Route 74, formerly County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said map; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot 176, South 20°39'38" West, 74.676 meters to the northeasterly corner of Parcel 1, as described in a Deed to Meadowbrook Investment Company Inc., recorded duly 15, 1953, in Book 1491, Page 289 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Parcel 1, North 39°36'46" West, 14.242 meters; thence North 20°18'47" East, 52.999 meters; thence North 19°41'33" East, 9.912 meters to a point on said northerly line, said northerly line being the northerly line of said Lot 176; thence easterly along said northerly line, South 89° 26' 36" East, 13.691 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 864.5 square meters (9305 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 48-RIV-74-34.1-13637 (13637-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, +r under my direction, in conformance with 1 ie Professional Land Surveyors A Signature Date: Sh ; '_ _ 44307 XPIRES 9/30/01 D/ 10 SHEET 1 OF 1 Y* s5.0 15 T5S; R4Vh SBM SCALE' 1'1000 6 15 589'26'36"E 13.691m N'LY LINE LOT 176 & N'LY LINE SECTION 22 -. 21 22 1419'41'33"E 9.912 m LOT 176 PROGRESS I VE siBriJV1s1oN MAP MB 16/56 NE'LY LINE PCL 1 PER DEED TO MEADOWBRDOK INVESTMENT CO. PER BK.1491/289 D.R., REC.. 7-15-53 PARCEL 1 N39 36'46"W 14.242 m NE'LY COR. PARCEL I L, 3311 EAST SIELSY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEE, 19491 980-1982 FAX1 19091 941-0891 Associated Engineers, Inc. 415tRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KLOPOST 74 33.6/34.0 AREA PARCEL 110.1 SOUARE FEET: SOUARE WIERS. 43637-I 9305 664.5 P09 (NE'LY CDR LOT 176) ct- THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13637-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 4 and Lot "D" as shown on Parcel Map No. 14958 situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 79, Page 51 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeasterly corner of said Lot "D", saidcomer being the point of intersection of the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters!, with the centerline of Mazie Avenue, said centerline being the southerly line of said Lot "D", said centerline also being the southerly line of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, all as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along said centerline and said southerly line, North 89"26'36" West, 7200 meters; thence North 19°41'34' East, 52.085 meters; thence North 20°09'04" East, 39.741 meters to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 4, said point being distant westerly thereon, North 89°29'49" West, 8.515 meters from the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence easterly along said northerly line, South 8929'49" East, B.515 meters to said northeasterly corner, said corner being on said northwesterly line of State Highway 74; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Parcel 4 and Lot "D" South 20°39'38" West, 92.277 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 689.0 square meters (7416 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Mazie Avenue). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.0-13639 (13639-1) This real property description has been pre )a-fe y me, or under my direction, in conformance the Pjpfesonai Laid Su J Act. Signal Date: M:1941 1, L.S. 4430 NSE EXPIRES 9/30/01 12 *7 PARCEL 3 SIN COR F SEC 15 PARCEL 2 EXIST MAZIE AVENUE PARCEL 1 N'L Y LINE OF PCt 4 PARCEL 4 LOT C kik 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. 19091 980-1912 FAX (9091 941-0891 Associated Engineers, Inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE NIL OPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 it F inn 7 1 P06 SE'LY COR OF LOT "Cr r3a , .30 .1 LDT2 f AREA PARCEL Na,: 13639-1 SOME FEET: 1416 SUUARE METERS: F>RG_C1 PAFU EL 1 • PARCEL 2 L O T 55 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR& 13639-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL OESCR I PT I ON • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map No. 6013, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fined in Book 14, Page 72 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters], as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 1, North 89° 27' 11" West, 9.211 meters; thence North 24° 09' 43" East, 60.637 meters; thence North 28° 42' 38" East, 14.058 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 1, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 57° 36' 24" West, 3.041 meters from the northeasterly comer of said Parcel 1; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 57° 36' 24" East, 3.041 meters to said northeasterly corner, said corner being on said northwesterly line of State Highway 74; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Parcel 1, South 20° 39' 38" West, 70.658 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 452.0 square meters (4865 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.2-13644 (13644-1) This real property description h... be , pre re /by me, or under my direction, in conformance wit Prof I L Su -y .Act. Signature Date: J ' .r r • ! S `, L . 4430 ICE ' EXPIRES 9/0101 19.,99T%SWMPINGWEE 1)34+3.000 '14 FARDEL 1 FM 6 6013 PM8 14//2 SIT LINE OF PCL !MB IA/72 N99'271"1Y 9.2tlm FARC5 PM 1 958 P -19/51 kik Associated Engineers, Inc. AREA PARC 13644-1 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY I,00OI0335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. 19091 960-r382 FAX: !9091 94I-0691 DISTRICT COUNTY RDUTE IULOPOST 06 RIVERSIDE T4 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.1 13644-1 SQUARE Fair 4865 SQUARE METERS: 452.0 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL' DESCR I FAT I ON 76V3644-IAgn E m E • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map No. 6013, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 14, Page 72 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being on the northwesterly nine of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15240 meters], as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 1, North 89u 27' 11" West, 9.211 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said southerly line, North 89° 27' 11" West, 19.161 meters; thence North 20° 35' 35" East, 6.117 meters; thence South 70" 50' 26" East, 18.006 meters to the TRIPE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 55.1 square meters (593 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.2-13644 (13644-2) This real property description has been prepare e, or under my direction, in conformance wi the Profession, Land, rvey+ Signatur Date: LIC E EXPIRES 9/3Q/0i 430 16 • 4C Y i SCALE:MW "pa.s 6.jrJs . S'LY LIKE OF PCL 1 PFIB 14/72� ‘ Ye PARCEL 1 PM 6013 PM. 1-4/72 TO. zs s4a TPOB N69.2T11"W 19.161 PARCEL 1 FM 14952 PME 79/51 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. 19091 960-1992 FAX, (909) 941-0691 DISTRIL T Oe COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KILOPOST 74 33.6/40.2 POC 5E1 -Y COR OF PO_ 1 PMB 14/72 AREA PARCEL N04 SQUARE FEET' SQUARE METERS: 13644-2 593 55.1 1307 / THE HEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. 2.144 / 1 PuL 4- PARCEL7 13844-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 2 as shown on Parcel Map No. 6013, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 14, Page 72 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters], as shown on said Parcel Map; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 2, North 57° 36' 24" West, a distance of 3.041 meters; thence North 28° 42' 38" East, 8.988 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 2, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 570 24' 13" West, 1.757 meters from the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 57° 24' 13" East, 1,757 meters to said northeasterly corner, said corner being on said northwesterly line of State Highway 74; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2, South 20° 39' 38" West, 9.154 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 21.5 square meters (231 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1963, Zone 6. Mul'tip'ly distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.2-13648 (13648-1) This real property description has been prepared or under my direction, in conformance with _ e Professional nd Su eyar Signature Date: r1 :r. • s o • �• • {_icens 4 Aires 9130101 I+:L99i 361MAPPN WEErnl S i670.CM]C 18 ( NO, 4+330 Ln ExP' 09/30/01 015 SWIT LINE pF PCL 2 PM 6013 rJV]E 14/72 PAF OEI 1 PM 14958 FM8 79/51 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. (9091 990-1987 FAX' (909) 941-0691 COUNTY cwo5NSrw ROUTE ,c oposr T■ 53.6/40.2 PARCEL No.: SQUARE FEET: SQUARE METERS: SECTION 1E$ NE'LY. LINE OF PCL 457' 36'24" ri 104r 13648-1 231 21.5 NE'Lr Con OF PCL 2 POB SE'LT coo OF PCL 2 THE BEAR#IGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED OM THE. CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBT AM GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCH: 13648-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION nin\�k 17�G•a.IA • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: • BEGINNING at the Northwesterly corner of Lot B, of Parcel Map No. 21632, filed in Book 141, Pages 79 through 81 inclusive of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said corner being the southwesterly corner of land described in a Trust Transfer Deed to M.V. Duffy ,James (Trustee) recorded May 19, 1992, as Instrument 180824 of Official Records, in said Office of said County Recorder, said southwesterly corner being a point on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74 (60.000 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map, said southeasterly line being a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 882.294 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 61° 28' 27" East; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of 03° 39' 43" an arc length of 56.392 meters to the northwesterly corner of said land described in said Trust Transfer Deed, said corner being the southwesterly corner of Lot C of said Parcel Map; thence easterly along the southerly line of said Lot C and Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map, said southerly line being the northerly line of said land described in said Trust Transfer Deed, South 89° 55' 16" East, 7.827 meters; thence South 22° 54' 26" West, 54.692 meters to a point on the southerly line of said land described in said Trust Transfer Deed, said southerly line being the northerly line of said Lot B and Parcel 4 of said Parcel Map, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89° 55' 09" East, 11.868 meters from said first mentioned southwesterly corner; thence westerly along said last mentioned southerly line, North 89° 55' 09" West, 11.868 rneters to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 479.5 square meters (5,161 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-35.1-13662 (13662-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under conformance with he Professional and Surveyors i* ct. f Signature 44 L1C E EXPIRES 9130161 Date: m direction, in M; wI mv.i.appahvADEEDS11166.1.0Cv: {r T POB NW COR OF LOT "9" f / //A SE'LY LINE OF STATE RTE T4''y / / / / / NOTE: .ems X576'+: LLE OF PCL 3 PDri NW I/1 SEC l5; T5S} 4Wk SSM N m9I R9.55 A•g LL] C.0 a Lij EL al 0 0 -4-- 6.09Em (209 StV LINE OF LAND DEEDED TO IM.V. DUFFY JAMS iTRUSTEE) AS MIST. NO. 180824 0-R„ REC.. MAY 19, 1992 N•LY LINE OE` PCL 4 PARCEL 4 PM 21 3J. PM9 J41/79-31 LOTS "0" AND "C' ARE PR10R RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATIONS PER Pµ 21632, PA1O 141/79-91. SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY Associated Engineer's, Inc. 330 EAST SHELOY STREET OI4TARIO. CA 91161 TEL. 190919140-1982 FAx 19091941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST AREA PARCEL No.: SOUAIIE FEET: 13662-I SIG! 0 18288m 160.1 71. 9J44m 1 9.144m (3D'I aa•1 1 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBTAIN GRODU I EVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13662-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lot 20, Lot H and southerly Half of Lot D, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, per Map filed in Book 11, Page 60 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60 feet wide) [18.288 meters], formerly known as County Highway with the centerline of Eugene Street, Lot D, (40.00 feet wide) [12.192 meters) said centerline being the northerly line of said southerly half of Lot D as shown on said map; thence easterly along said centerline, North 89° 12' 57" East, 6.964 meters; thence South 22° 44' 05" West, 6.648 meters to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 20, said northerly line being the southerly line of said Lot 0; thence South 21° 57' 21" West, 49.781 meters to a point on the westerly line of said Lot 20, said westerly line being the easterly line of Robert Street, Lot H, (20.00 feet wide) [6.096 meters] as shown an said map; thence continuing South 21° 57' 23" West, 16.370 meters to a point on the centerline of said Robert Street, said centerline being the westerly line of said Lot H; thence northerly along said last mentioned centerline, and said westerly line, North 00" 05' 36" East, 16.509 meters to a paint on the northwesterly line of said Lot 1-1, said northwesterly line being said southeasterly line of State Highway 74; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly and southeasterly line, North 21° 45' 46" East, 54.785 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing, approximately 397.6 square meters (4,280 square feet). TOGE f HER with tee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74, Eugene Street and Robert Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California" Coordinate System of 1983, Zane 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-35.3-13665 (13665 - This real property description has been prepared mp, or under my direction, in conformance with Professi nal end Sj. eyor Date: 22 1S 144175if-W91:WN1[EED5\11665,Can( SCALE: I 60 �E as oka z r ¢' ' 0 ti ' su I [tJ I I v1 1- 0 w m ku \ cc tt Associated Engineers. Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. 009) 980-1962 FAX$ 19091 S41-0891 nptT yet rntr.JtY nMuTC KR 11 1' OJ 0- 0 1-- 0 r cr ti� oo 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 • N'LY LINE OF THE SLY HALF OF LOT 0 yE EUGENE STREET 522'44'05"W 6.648 m LOT El NIT LINE LOT 20 SLY LINE LOT 0 • GOOD HOPE ACRES S M2 J1/60 AREA PARCEL No.: 13665-1 SQUARE FEET: 4.280 LOT 20 THE BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0" ' 331 TO OBTAIN GROU21,13 LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13665-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • Fee Being those portions of Lot 19 and the Northerly Half Lot "D" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 60 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 19, said northwesterly corner being the southwesterly corner of Parcel Map No. 19343, filed in Book 119, Page 87 of Parcel Maps in the Office of said County Recorder, said northwesterly corner also being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 Feet wide) 118.288 meters], formerly known as County Highway as shown on said map; thence southerly along said southeasterly line of said State Highway 74, and the northwesterly line of said Lot 19, South 21° 45' 46" West, 60.954 meters to the southwesterly corner of land granted to Hampton P. and Carotene Delonde, recorded October 30, 1970, as Instrument 109651 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said southwesterly corner being the northwesterly corner of land granted to Gary D. and Deborah L. Rantz, recorded April 4, 1989 as Instrument 104933 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, South 21° 451 46" West, 48.322 meters to a point of intersection with the centerline of Eugene Street, Lot D (40.00 feet wide) [12.192 meters], as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres, said centerline being the southerly line of said Northerly Half of Lot 0; thence easterly along said centerline and said southerly line, North 89° 12' 57" East, 6.964 meters; thence North 22° 44' 05" East, 48.672 meters to a point on the northerly line of said land granted to Hampton P. and Carotene Delonde, said northerly line being the southerly line of said land granted to Gary D. and Deborah L. Rentz; thence westerly along said northerly and southerly line, South 89° 12' 57" West, 7.858 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 330.8 square meters (3,561 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Eugene Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances, 08-RIV-74-35.4-13667 (13667-1) This real property description has b en firepared�,-� conformance with Profe - •nal!n; eyorf ct. Signature: xpir- 1 � � 1 Date: m 43 27 or under my direction, in NL O r 4 SCALE. It1000 SHEET I OF T7 IMP FESTUS CIRCLE wt S'LY LINE OF P.M. I9343 MAP OF GOOD HO.RE ABRES BOOK II, PAGE 60 O S'I_Y LINE HAMPTON P. & CAROLENE OELONDE PER 1NST.1096510.R. REC. 10-30-T0. 5 2' " w 2 -7.85889'1 m57 (25.761`1 • ' N'LY LINE GARY 0. & DEBORAH L. RANTZ PER INST. 104933 O.R. REC. 4-4-89. \.TPOB EUGENE STREET LDT STY LINE OF N'LY HALF OF LOT D N89'(2'5TE 6.964 m (22848'0 LO- 20 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9{T64 Ta.. (9091 980--1962 1 AX, (9091 941-0691 AREA WWI COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSIDE 74 ILLOPOST 31.6/40,2 PARCEL NO4 13661-1 SOUARE FEETI 3.561 SQUAW METERS~ 330.8 PARCEL 13667-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION in+R ICCT-1.Hnn • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 19 as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 60 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 19, said northwesterly corner being the southwesterly corner of Lot A of Parcel Map No. 19343, filed in Book 119, Page 87 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said northwesterly corner also being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], formerly known as County Highway as shown on said map; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 19 and the southerly line of said Parcel Map, North 89' 08' 47" East, 14.814 meters; thence South 57° 09' 51" West, 9.440 meters; thence South 22° 44' 05" West, 55.952 meter to a point on the southerly line of land granted to Hampton P. and Carolene Delonde, recorded October 30, 1970, as Instrument 109651 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder, said southerly line being the northerly line of land granted to Gary D. and Deborah L. Rentz, recorded April 4, 1989, as Instrument 104933 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder, said point being distant easterly thereon, North 89° 12' 57" East, 7.858 meters from the southwesterly corner of said land granted to Hampton P. and Carotene Delonde; thence westerly along said southerly and northerly line, South 89° 12' 57" West, 7,858 meters to said last 'mentioned southwesterly corner, said southwesterly corner being on said southeasterly line of State Highway 74; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot 19, North 21° 45' 46" East, 60.954 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 488.7 square meters (5,260 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-35.5-13668 (13668-1) This real property description has been prepared by rr►e, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional L.. nd Surveyors Signature: Date: 4430 NO. 4430 xp. 0913,0/01 26 • W NIY COR 0 LOT 19 Illik Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY S1REET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. 19091 9B0-1982. F ASfi 53091 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 50 5r C)343 M1B 1191E31 1Y'LY LINE OF PM 19343 0 .11 S'LY LINE OF PM 19343 N"LY LINE OF LOT 19 LOT 19 TODD HOPE I C E8 MB 1 1 J J S'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO HAMPTON P. AND CAROLENE DELONDE A5 INST. NO. 1096510.8.. REC TO -30-1970 N"LT LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO GARY D. AND DEBORAH L. RANTZ AS INST. NO. 1049]3 0.R.. REC 4-o4-1989 AREA PARCEL No.: 13668-I SNARE FEET; 5260 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM.OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13668-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION cnnAoc uclroc. .+ n , EXHIBIT "A" • • • Fee Being aportion of Lot 4, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 60 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows:: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 4, said southeasterly corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], formerly known as County Highway as shown on said map, said corner also being a point on a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 591.283 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 67° 07' 40" West; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 4, said northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 06° 26' 43" an arc length of 66.514 meters to the southeasterly corner of land described in a Grant Deed to the Southern California Edison Company, recorded December 4, 1968, as Instrument 117945 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Grant Deed to the Southern California Edison Company, North 81° 20' 48" West 14.594 meters; thence South 29° 04' 43" West, 12.891 meters; thence South 26° 34' 56" West, 56.776 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 4 said point being distant westerly thereon, South 89` 31' 01" West, 16.858 meters from said southeasterly corner of said Lot; thence easterly along said southerly line, North 89° 31' 01" East, 16.858 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 957.9 square meters (10,311 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74.35.6-13670 (13670-1) This real proper- descr.tio d by me, or under my direction, in conformance +it 'h "�■'e on..,, ! , :urv: Fors Ac Date: M:1`fltlWMApP9 4 \1300.M( 28 SHEET I OF I SCALE: II BOO H 03 0 LOT MAP Or GOOD HOPE ACRES ax, 1 1 ; PC, 80 S'LY LINE OF LAND TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. INST. 111945 O.R., REC. 12-04-68 LOT 4 5"LY LINE LOT 4 LOT 5 Associated Engineers, Inc. c [I367O3 ca N89' 31'or'E 16.858 m .0 4° 2 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 917614 TEL. (9091 990-1992 FAX (9091 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 09 RIVERSIDE 74 KILOP0 S T 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL No.r 13670-1 SOLIARE FEET: 10.311 SQUARE METERS: 957.9 PAR DEL I PJMJ 19343 P.JLB, 119/2/ Q IMP FESTUS CIRCLE THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13670-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 6, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California„ filed in Book 11, Page 60 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as foliows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 6, said southwesterly corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18,288 meters]; formerly known as County Highway as shown on said map; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 6 and said southeasterly line, North 40° 48' 64" East, 66,611 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1755.380 meters; thence continuing along said northwesterly and southeasterly tine and along said curve through a central angle of 01° 16' 01" an are length of 38.815 meters; thence South 36° 51' 09" West, 100.105 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 6, said point being distant easterly thereon, North 89° 14' 06" East, 8,675 meters from said southwesterly corner; thence westerly along said southerly line, South 89° 14' 06" West, 8.675 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 326,7 square meters (3,517 square feet)_ • TOGETHER with foe Interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used In the above description are based en the californ$A Coordinate System of 1988, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08 -RI V-74.35.8-13676 (13676-1) This real property description has been prepare• .y e, or under my direction, In conformance dI a Prof -ior Date: 3Q UV Woe 567641 LnT 7 Assoelsted Engineers, !no. AREATa. CIO C-r952 Rini IiO i sda-ontC10% 75 f1W Ri7S-I WW1' cowsr7 ROUTE Kt.QPCSY SOK f Tr 3517 Lgm THE ECAlFORNIIA COO DISTANCES SYSTEOF I o►4g C MULTIPLY UIs r s BY r,OOOIO3 i T4 OBTAIN ROUN 1 DIST� PAR[ 18676-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY Fru nrc!'_R l PT I ON • • • • EXHIBIT "A„ Fee Being a portion of Lot 1, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 60 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 1, said northeasterly corner being the point of intersection of the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters), formerly known as County Highway, with the southerly line of Eimer Street (20.00 feet half width) [6.096 meters as shown on said map, said corner also being a point on a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1737.092 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 50° 45' 20" East; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line, the southeasterly line of said Lot 1 and said curve through a central angle of 01° 34' 15", an arc length of 47.624 meters; thence continuing southwesterly along said northwesterly and southeasterly line, South 40° 48' 54" West, 15.234 meters to the southeasterly corner of land granted to Gerald Fields, recorded June 24, 1975, as Instrument 74520 of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder, said southeasterly corner being the northeasterly corner of land granted to Jorge Garcia, Et Ux., recorded October 19, 1979, as Instrument 222419 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along the southerly line of said land granted to Gerald Fields, and the northerly line of said land granted to Jorge Garcia, Et. Ux., South 89° 11' 27"West, 26.196 meters; thence North 37° 09' 33" East, 4.172 meters; thence North 380 47' 21" West, 40.670 meters to the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 40.856 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 38" 00' 22" East; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 38° 48' 55" an arc length of 27.678 meters to a point on a line that is parallel with and 3.048 meters southerly measured at right angles from said first mentioned southerly line and the northerly of said Lot 1; thence westerly along saki parallel line, South 89° 11' 27" West, 8.214 meters; thence at right angles, North 00° 48' 33" West, 3.048 meters to a point on said first mentioned southerly line and said northerly line of Lot 1; thence easterly along said first mentioned southerly Tine and said northerly line of Lot 1, North 89° 11' 27" East, 123.742 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 2,992.6 square meters (32,212 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Elmer Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-35.9-13677 (13677-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act_ Signature: Date: s L. Elliott, L`S' 6334 Expires 12/31/02 S -22 --off w-A=9i as +PPING\ tcsk13n.ECC 32 N89' IM2T n S4' 0'. R 40 656m L=27.678m LOT 1 LOT 2 SC71 ON I o 4 41 ti, 0 h r5S y R4W; Sem Q4 mot` ��, t EXIST ELMER STREET —_,,, 61. rl Of 010' ocai Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 950-1982 FAIr 1909) 941-0891 SA0' 40'54"'K 15.234m S89' tl'27"'M 26.196m 4' AREA 015 TR1C T 08 COUNTY ROUTE RIVERSIDE 74 KILOPOST 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.e 13677-{ SQUARE FEETt 32,212 SQUARE 1IETERSI 2,992.6 6.096m (20 1 POB NE'LY COR OF LOT 1 SE COR OF LAND GRANTED TO GERALD FIELDS AS INST. NO. 74520 O.R.. REC. 6-24-1975 LOT 6 NE COR OF LAND GRANTED N. TO JORGE GARCIA. ET UX., AS INST. NO. 222419 0.R.. REC. 10-19-1979 ,\O \\ jifPCD LOT 7 • • THE BEARINGS MID DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBTAfN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13677-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCR I PT I ON- • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded July 7, 1915, in Book 406, Page 273 of Deeds in the Office of the County Recorder of said County with the southerly line of said Section 10, said State Highway 74 and said southerly line being shown on Parcel Map No. 9921, filed in Book 49, Pages 24 and 25 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being distant westerly thereon South 89° 11' 27" West, 525.305 meters from the southeasterly comer of said Section 10, said point also being a point on a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1755.380 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 51° 30' 48" East; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Michael Rodolakis et.al., recorded June 27,1995, as instrument 207109 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder and said curve through a central angle cf 01° 31' 15" an arc length of 46.598 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; a radial line through said point bears South 53° 02' 03" East; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 21' 46" an arc length of 11.116 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, North 36° 36' 11" East, 153.470 meters to the most northerly corner of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Michael Rodolakis et.al., said northerly corner being the northwesterly corner of land granted to Michael J. and Marion E. Erickson, recorded June 5, 1985, as ''instrument 120425 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southerly along the easterly line of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Michael Rodolakis etal., and the westerly line of said land granted to Michael J. and Marion E. Erickson, South 00° 09' 27" West, 33.404 meters; thence North 52° 08' 27" West, 15.999 meters; thence South 37° 51' 48" West, 5.616 meters; thence South 370 46' 03" West, 116.382 meters; thence South 41° 33' 20" West, 16.153 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 590.3 square meters (6,354 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Elmer Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R IV -74-35.0-13682 (13682-1) This real prope . .escription h. been prepar7, by e, or under my direction, in conformance he P ss I La rve, .rs eiiar Signat SCALE: 1: 1000 A=00.21.46': R=IT55.3B0 m L=U.116 in �oF yh TPOB F'1 INW'LY LINE OF LAND TO MICHAEL ROOM. Ms, ET AL PER MIST. 207109 lll0R. REC. 6-27-95 SHEET 1 OF 1 N52.08.2T" lY 15.999 m $37' 51'481V W 5.616 m E'LY LINE OF LAND TO MICHAEL R000LAKIS, ET AL PER FIST. 207109 0.R., REC. 6-27-95 & M'LY LINE OF LAND TO MICHAEL .L & MARION E. ERICICSON PER 1145T. 20425 O.R., REC. 6-S-85 SE 114 SED 10 ThSIR4W S'M PM 9921 PMfl 49124:25 STREET 589' 1`27°"W 525.305 m. MAP OF' GOOD HOPE ACRES OC SE S'LYTI LINE SEC d0 d ma 11/60 THE BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED SE9L..Y' 'TIE STATE HWY 74 ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY STANCES SHOWN BY I. 3U TO OBTAIN GROUN"LEVEL DISTANCES. SECTION 15 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91761 TEL. !9091 980-F9B2 FAX (909! 941-0891 PAC No,: 13682-1 fl none AREA SOU ARE FEET: 6354 PARCEL 13682-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY I nmi rIPCr.RIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the North Half of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the North Half of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, said land described as Parcels 1 and 2 of a Grant Deed to Prime Corners, L.P., recorded June 26, 1991 as Instrument 215453 of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of Parcel Map No. 16475, filed in Book 103, Page 15 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said southwesterly corner being on the northerly line of said North Half, said northerly line being the northerly line of said land granted to Prirne Corners, L.P.; thence westerly along said northerly line, South 89° 35' 37" West, 6.895 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 370 59' 42" West, 36.609 meters; thence South 07° 47' 09" East, 7.111 meters; thence South 37° 16' 32" West, 8.000 meters; thence South 82° 16' 15" West, 8.485 meters; thence South 36° 04' 12" West, 77.045 meters; thence South 38° 39' 51" West, 20.763 meters to a point on the westerly line of said land granted to Prime Corners L.P., said westerly line being the easterly line of land granted to Ronnie L. and Linda L. Reedy, recorded April 18, 1980, as Instrument 74639 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along said westerly and easterly fine, North 00° 09' 14" East, 16.168 meters to the point of intersection with the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded June 8, 1915, in Book 406, Page 247 of Deeds in said Office of the County, Recorder; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, North 36° 36' 11" East, 131.564 meters to a point on said northerly line; thence easterly along said northerly line, North 89° 35' 37" East, 14.669 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 1544.0 square meters (16,619 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.3-13690 (13690-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land,Survevr�# Signature Cam' Date: 36 Y a cx 4 z *49 I a4b wZ z . aid J - 1. "! -4 r0 J Z W J 4 14 Q- N'LY LIKE N112, 1412., E12 5E114. 5E1/4, SEE. 10, T5S. ROY. 5f3M 4' TPOB SO7'47'-0 71 ti N1/2r ili1/2; E1/ter SL114y SE1ll4y SEC, la; T5S y R4W y sam M'LT LINE OF LAND GRAKTEO TO PRIME CORNERS L.P., AS INST. t10. 26453 0.R. REC. 6-26-91 Li, 3311 EAST 51ELDY STREET OHTARO. CA 91764 TEL. t9091 950-l96Z FAX11709! 941-0591 Associated Engineers, inc. AREA V> W rtrt l�. .i} 0 LCl t4 R/W 5B9' 35.37-w s.695m poc sti-Li CPR PM 16475. P116 103/15 SECTION 10 S SE)111 • • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUN4 VEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13690-1 PARCEL Hoe 136Ro-I SKETCH. TO ACCOMPANY 5a21AFlf FEET: 16619 Ff.A1 PC.C'F7 I PT I flirt • • • EXH B1arTy "A„ e ov Construction Easement Being a portion of the North. Half of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the North Half of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, said land described as Parcels 1 and 2 of a Grant Deed to Prime Corners, LP., recorded June 26, 1991 as Instrument 215453 of Official Records in the Office of the County recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of Parcel Map No. 16475, filed in Book 103, Page 15 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said southwesterly corner being on the northerly line of said North Half, said northerly line being the northerly line of said land granted to Prime Corners, L.P.; thence westerly along said northerly line, South 89° 35' 37" West, 6.895 meters; thence South 37° 59' 42" West, 36.609 meters; thence South 07° 47' 09" East, 7.111 meters; thence South 370 16' 32" West, 8.000 meters; thence South 82° 16' 15" West, 8.485 meters; thence South 36° 04' 12" West, 77.045 meters; thence South 38° 39' 51" West, 7.356 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 380 39' 51" West, 13.407 meters to a point on the westerly line of said land granted to Prime Corners LP., said westerly line being the easterly line of land granted to Donnie L. and Linda L. Reedy, recorded April 18, 1980, as Instrument 74639 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southerly along saki westerly and easterly line, South 00° 09' 14" West, 22.484 meters; thence North 38° 39' 51" East, 31.001 meters; thence North 51° 20'_ 09" West, 14.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 310.9 square meters (3,346 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.3-13690 (13690-2) This real property description has been prepared b rne, or under my direction, in conformance wit hthae Proofession I Lan d urveyifs Date: 38 4:t99i 14.tM4`Pxi O®.+illf90-i'DOl 0 c re� Cm ow / �.s 4f b Li -v' J y 4 O dW Z w-4 tiii, 5311 EAST 51ELOY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. 19091 980-1952 F AXi 11 091 941-0891 WLY LINE P1f2, N1/2, [112 SEIr1, 5E1/4. SEC. 10, 155, RIW, SBW 4 4 507"11'09"E ° N1/2y X11/2y E1/2 y 3E3/4; SE 1 /4; SE G, 1 G} T $; RI -W y SEM 54.356m ^N TPOB _ N51' 20'094 I4.000m TCE N'LT LINE OF LAND GRANTEE) TO PRIME CORNERS L.P_ A5 INST. N0. 215453 O.R. REC. 6-26-51 Assodated Engineers, k1c.. DISTRICT COUNT ROUTE PARCEL No.: 13690-2 SOUAIIE FEET: 3346 EAST LINE Nr/2. WI/2 • 569' ]5']T" w G.895m POC 51P Lx COR PM 164 TS. PIJB 103115 •rq� G NN .ti U rh hi(0W --.'N O WTI C)r SED ION 1 D _5S; R 41i'J y S M1 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE ,BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY O1STANCES SHOWN BY L0000'630 TO OBTAIN GROU AI s WEE. DISTANCES. PARCEL 13690-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an Official Plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of Parcel Map No. 16475, filed in Book 103, Page 15 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of saki County, said southwesterly corner being the southeasterly corner of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 10; thence westerly along the southerly line of said South Half, South 89° 35' 37" West, 44.466 meters to a point on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded June 8, 1915, in Book 406, Page 247 of Deeds in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being the northeasterly comer of land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Sylvia J. Spears, recorded June 25,1997, as Instrument 222956 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence southwesterly along saki northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Sylvia J. Spears, South 36° 36' 11" West, 36.573 meters to the southeasterly comer of said land described in a Quitclaim geed to Sylvia J. Spears, said southeasterly comer being the northeasterly corner of land granted to Jose F. Maciel, recorded March 21, 1991, as instrument 093034 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence westerly along the southerly line of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Sylvia J. Spears, and the northerly line of said land granted to Jose F. Maciel, North 86° 52' 59" West, 21.628 meters; thence North 06° 59' 38" West, 1.018 meters; thence North 38° 00' 22" East,' 8.000 meters, thence North 81° 34' 19" East, 8.334 meters; thence North 33° 53' 03" East, 23.521 meters to a point on the northerly line of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Sylvia J. Spears, said northerly line being the southerly line of land granted to Howard and Pinkie Pickens, recorded on April 18, 1980, as instrument 74639 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said northerly line also being said southerly line of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 10, said point being distant westerly thereon from said first mentioned northeasterly corner, South 89° 35' 37" West, 17.244 meters; thence easterly along said last mentioned northerly and southerly lines, North 89° 35' 37" East, 17.244 meters to the TRUE POINT OFBEGINNING; Containing approximately 528.9 square meters (5,693 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property 4h and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.3-13692 (13692-1) 40 M:%99118VM1K'NNG EEDS11169'L.DOC • This rear prope conformance as b -en prey i y rne, or under my direction, in nal 41 • rs:11,9913PV 1HGX[EOS\1369Zax SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE: 11IOOO TPOB NE'LY C0ft LAND TO SYLVIA J. SPEARS. INST. 2229`x6 0.R. REC. 06-25-97 N'LY 'LINE OF LAH7 TO SLYVIA J. SPEARS. HST. 222956 OA REC. 06-25-97 AN0 S'LY UNE OF LAND TO HOWARD & PINKIE PICKENS,. HST. 74639 0.R. REC. 04-16-60 SLY LIE OF SOUTH V2 OF SW V4. NE V4. SE V SECTION 10 NEI"347rE 18.334 m N30•0022"E e.000 m 5'I.Y LINE OF LANG TO SLYVIA J. SPEARS, HST. 222955 OJt, REC. 06-25-97 AND N'LY UNE OF LAND TO JOSE F. I.IACIEL INST. 093034 0.R.. REC. 03 -2i -9I Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SNEL6Y STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. 19091 940-19$2 FA30 19091 94I-0891 DISTRICT nn COUNTY RWPCOF ROUTE 7+1 KILOPOS T POC 5W'LY COR PM 16475 K. 103, PG. 15 SE 1/4 ; sr 1/4 y G. C, JO 7.,5S, r RAC; S,S,l'y9� AREA PARCEL Nos SQUARE SET, SQUARE METERSu 13692-1 5,693 5?R.9 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY OISTANCES SHOWN BY L00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13692-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL OESCRIPTION • e Exhibit "A" Fee Uneconomic Remnant THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 16475, IN THE CITY OF PERRIS AS SHOWN IN BOOK 103, PAGE 15 OF PARCEL MAPS, OF SAID COUNTY. APN 345-060-040 CTPN 13696-1 43 • 345-06 (-3 arr ?P it ch it AC. 2f SO a1 32 rf !4 Sr rc . 11 psre 2LO kC k2w rrd� Ix; 06 ASPS n 7 /r+' 1•'.5 i 03 1 1/11 11,11 ! f!1 31 -AS 3+6 35 Z0, 21 a"f f1 2! 11 0 SS 4 0.44 4c sr 41 4! _ 21 rr; TPA. f}711 rV 15+A6 1 23±4 C 0 1.25'A C. 1.23ndC. 2. 5r At. PM 10 3115 Parcel Map Na. 16475 APA IL ,1972 • N //2 5E1/ 4 SEC. 10 l5 S, R.4 W 0 15414C: 0 4. 78MAC. 4.78110. 0 r. 0433; sr ors, rrdr=f1! r.04 s. os GL.O PLAY. Pro Prow! ro L; 1o Yrs CU.RY.F11 t1 AS . ?3,'p @ LOG As.t a.99As.• 3.23±40 Ie ^ -.s ea 4.95 AC. 4. 78JC 002 Act 2.©r Ac.+ 26641a, • �lA ! .t ,'44 As& ,g e4 Ar . L.1r P►,.+ SO 8 .4 a I3Aa! ASSESSO RS MAP 9K3415PG.06 RIV ERSIDE c JNrr, CALIF. • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 1 lying Southeasterly of State Highway 74, as shown on Parcel Map 16475, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 103, Page 15 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being on the southerly line of land granted to Lee C. Cooley, recorded April 20, 1970, as Instrument 36500 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along the northerly line of said Parcel 1 and said southerly line, South 89° 41'52" West, 31.983 meters to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 873.950 meters, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, a radial line through said point bears South 56° 511 05" East; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 03° 02' 48" an arc length of 46.466 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, said southwesterly line being the comer cut-off for Parcel 1; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 25° 08' 22" West, 7.914 meters to the most westerly point on said corner cut-off, said point being on the southeasterly line of said Lot A; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line, South 19° 45' 30" West, 21.264 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot A, said point being on a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 45.717 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 19" 45' 40" West; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 07° 50' 40" an arc length of 6.259 meters to a point on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, forrierly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded May 28, 1915, in Book 406, Page 240 of Deeds in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, North 36° 36' 11" East, 56.713 meters to a point on said northerly and southerly line; thence easterly along said northerly and southerly line, North 89° 14' 52" East, 14.383 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 628.7 square meters (6,767 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Pearls Path). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by"1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.5-13697 (13697-1) This real property description has been pre red b -, or under my direction, in conformance wit a Profess' al L Date: SHEET 1 OF • SCALED 111000 SE'LY LINE STATE HIGHWAY 74 PER OK.406.PG-240 OF DEEDS 4,07.50' 40" R-45.71.7 m L'6.259 m e 4 AN I SE'LY LINE STATE HIGHWAY 74 PER 8K.406. PG.240 OF OEMS re - "1 + TPOB 99.4r5 SSs. 31.96 k'{.Y LINE PCL I SLY LIE OF LAND TO LEE C. COOLEY PER HST. 36500 0R. REC. 4-20-70 PQC {NE`LY co* PCL I1 PA. GE► MAP PAID a J6475 ?MG 103/15 emu" FOR. PARCEL ------- SE'LY LINE LOT "A' N25 '08'22"14 7.914 m •45'40-INR.1 SW'LY LINE PCI_ I EXIST 4 PEARLS PATH 7.620 n 125'1 PARCEL 3 Associated Enneers, inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9#764 TEL. 1909) 9801962 FAX,' 1909) 941-0891 asTRscT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE MONIST 74 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL NO. SQUARE FEIN S0UAR£ S' 13697-1 6.767 628,7 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 4 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALEF0RNCA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR 13697-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 1 Tying Southeasterly of State Highway 74, as shown on Parcel Map 16475, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 103, Page 15 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeasterly comer of said Parcel 1, said comer being on the southerly line of land granted to Lee C. Cooley, recorded April 20, 1970, as Instrument 36500 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence westerly along the northerly line of said Parcel 1 and said southerly line, South 89° 41' 5T West, 31.983 meters to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 873.950 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 56° 51' 05' East; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 03° 02' 48° an arc length of 46.466 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, said southwesterly line being the corner cut-off for Parcel 1, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 25° 08' 22° East, 5.478 meters to the most easterly point on said comer cut-off; thence easterly along said the southerly line of said Parcel 1, North 89° 37' 00' East, 1.472 meters; thence North 36° 29' 43" East, 2.180 meters; thence North 53° 49' 58° West, 6.000 meters to a point said non -tangent curve, a radial line through said point bears South 53° 49' 58" East; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 00° 01' 41" an arc length of 0.426 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 11.5 square meters (124 square feet) The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, which first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.6-13697 (13697-2) This real property description has b conformance with ofessi• Signature: Date: pre • - • + by e r under my direction, in Su 47 IlWi.XV,AoPt/NSOCUZ113677+2Ad: SHEET 1 OF I Y SCALD 111000 44) 411 CAI 44' �f TPOB sw'LY LINE PCL I Associated Engineers, Inc. 33k EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 T0.. (9091 980-1982 FAX' 1909} 941-0891 17iS TF71C T COUNTY ROUTE p1.C.SNSF 7A KLOPOST Ri c/[F1 a a TPOB elf POR. PARC p `4—sE LY LIE LOT "A' SEE DETAL BELOW rE 7.620 ■ C2517 SlY LFNE OF LAW TO LEE C. COOLEY PER }1ST. 36500 OR. REC. 4-20-70 PoC CNE'LY C0R PCL 11 589'41'52"1 51.983m sss. N'_Y LRE PCL I PARCEL 1 lAP NO . 16-4/5 � PMEI 103/ 15 EL It EXIST PEA RLS PATH 7.524 m 1'157 PARCEL 3 00'01'41" R-673.950 M SW49' 58"C °1 s., s PARCEL I S'LY LINE PCL 1 N89'37'00"E 1.472 m I EXIST PEARLS PATH DETAIL N.T.S. AREA PARCEL No.I 13697-2 SQUARE FEET' 124 SQUARE %TER& iL5 PAIWIL 2 PARCEL 4 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00009630 TO DBTAJN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13697-2. SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, excepting therefrom the portion lying southeasterly of the northwesterly line of that portion conveyed to the County of Riverside, for highway purposes recorded May 26, 1915, in Book 406, Page 240 of Deeds in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said South Half, said northwest corner being shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 75, Page 9 of Records of Survey in said Office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along the northerly line of said South Half, the northerly line of land described in a Deed to Alan K. Smith, et. al, recorded July 11, 1967, as Instrument 59768 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, and the southerly line of land described in a Deed to Robert L. Lozano and Jesse McFadden, recorded May 12, 1998, as Instrument 186906 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, North 89° 52' 42" East, 121.778 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northerly and southerly line, North 89° 52' 42" East, 31.487 meters to a point on said northwesterly line; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line, South 25° 58' 23" West, 38.170 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 864.009 meters; thence continuing southwesterly along said northwesterly line and along said curve through a central angle of 05° 02' 52" an arc length of 76.120 meters to a point on the southerly line of said South half, said southerly line being the southerly line of said land described in Deed to Alan K. Smith, said southerly line also being the northerly line of Iand described in a Grant deed to Lee C. Cooley, recorded April 20, 1970, as Instrument 36500 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along said last mentioned southerly and northerly line, South 89° 47' 31" West, 22.032 meters; thence North 28° 28' 30" East, 1.325 meters; thence North 17° 28' 22" " East, 24.468 meters; thence North 30° 41' 03" East, 33.752 meters to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 833.019 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 67° 10' 29" East; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 03° 30' 52" an arc length of 51.098 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 2780.5 square meters (29,929 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. This real pro+ ri desc conformanc e P, Signature Date: #Y.199116WAPPt E°:11 08-RIV-7436.7-13700 (1 r under my direction, in NO, 4400 /Up.0 49 • TPOB R.S, ,�3O N89'52'42"E 112/,7T8m N'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO ALAN K.51.11TH, ET. AL.. AS INST. NO. 59168 Obi.. REC. T-4-11967 POC NM CPR 51/2. NE1/4. NEI/4, S€1/4. SEC 10 T55. R411. SBN S`LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO ALAN K. WITH, EL AL.. AS INST. NO. 59768 O.R., REC. 1-1-1957 N28' 28'30.E 1.325m N'LY ICE Of LAND GRANTED TO 1,EE C. COOLEY AS INST. NO. 76500 O.R., REC. 4-20-1970 ti\ Associated Engineers, ino. 331 EAST 5NELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. [9091 780-1982 FAX. (9091 941-0891 flSTR1r.T cot YNTY anrlTr rh nano Y m a 41. 1489 ' 52'42' 31.487m Ra► NJ/2; S 1/4; NE J /- y SE 1 /4 SSG JON JO T5S y R241; S M1 AREA PARCEL NO.: 13700-1 SOUARE FEET: 29929 • THE BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE 5YSTEM DF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY U16,TANCES SHOWN BY 1.000 TO OBTAIN GROUND EL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13700-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY 1 ( 1 nFCrPIPT If1N • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the South Half of the North 150 feet [45.720 meters] of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, excepting therefrom of that portion deeded to the County of Riverside, for highway purposes (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] recorded May 26, 1915, in Book 406, Page 240 of Deeds in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said South Half, said northeast corner being on the northwesterly line of said portion deeded to the County of Riverside, said portion being shown as State Highway 74 (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 68, Page 80 of Records of Survey in said Office of the County Recorder, said corner also being on a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 340.212 meters, a radial line through said point bears, South 77° 23' 56" East; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 030 58' 43" an arc length of 23.625 meters to a point on the southerly line of said North 150 feet [45.720 meters], said southerly line being the southerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Manual D. and Carolyn Ortiz, recorded March 5, 1999, as Instrument 090465 of Official Records in saidOffice of the County Recorder; thence westerly along said southerly line and the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Robert L. Lozano and Jesse McFadden, recorded May 12, 1998, as Instrument 186906 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, South 89° 58' 59" West, 36.083 meters to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 833.019 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 740 40' 29" East; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 01° 37' 27" an arc length of 23.613 meters to a point on the northerly of said South Half, said northerly line being the northerly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Manual D. and Carolyn Ortiz, said northerly line also being the southerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Robert G. and Lorena R. Ramos, recorded September 30, 1999, as Instrument 435799 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along said last mentioned northerly and southerly line, North 89° 58' 59" East, 36.116 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 827,0 square meters (8,902 square feet), TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 51 1u557L1 PORT €514443MHMPIIWOF o', 1 1704 MC • 08-RIV-74-36.8-13704 (13704-1) This real property description has been prepare y:y n e, or under my direction, in conformance wit Profess utrve Signature Date: IMBIO ^ KI, L.S. 4430 XPIA S 9!30101 52 • • e.Rno. i l xn. m` SHEET 1 OF 1 • • • SCALE+ f 1000 CENTER QUARTER SECTION L11E 1 S'LY LINE OF GRANT DEED TO ROBERT G. & LORENA R. RAMOS PER INST.435194 O.R. REC. SEPT. 30.1999 RS ----511 68/20 N'LY LIE OE GRANT 0 TO ROBERT L.LOZAHA & JESSE UcFADDE13 PER 1NST.186906 0.R. REC. MAY 12.1998 c— N'LY LIFE OF DEED TO NA}RJAL 0. & CAROLYN ORTR PER MT. 090465 OI1. REC. }/AR. 5. t999 6d71. 37'21" R=633.019rn Le23.6C3m U2+ S`LY LIE OF DEED TO MANUAL D. A CAROLYN ORTIZ PER F15T.090465 0.R. REC. AFAR. 5. 1999 1489 52'42"E 121.T Tarn NE J/4; SE 1/4; SEB 1O T5S; R4W SAM F'M 9921 FMB 49/24;25 r N89.58`591: 1 MP MARGARTH ST R/W R/W 'EXIST MARGARTH ST J .'58 6 3'5843" R3 m L 23.625m SEC J1 T5s; RAW W SBM j THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM or I9B3. ZONE 6. MIJLTIPL 1STANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROLII�LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 336 EAST 5I -ELY STREFT ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL (9091 9804962 FAXs 1909) 941-0691 AREA PARCEL No..1 13104-1 CA? 'Aar [VC T. CIO P1'1 I. PARCEL 13704-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY • • EXHIBIT "A„ Fee Being a portion of the North Half of the North 150 feet [45.720 meters] of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, excepting therefrom that portion Deeded to the County of Riverside, for highway purposes (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], recorded May 26, 1915, in Book 406, Page 240 of Deeds in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said North Half, said southeast corner being on the northwesterly line of said portion Deeded to the County of Riverside, said portion being shown as State Highway 74 (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 68, Page 80 of Records of Survey in said Office of the County Recorder, said corner also being on a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 340.212 meters, a radial line through said point bears, South 77° 23' 56" East; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 03° 55' 04" an arc length of 23.263 meters to a point on the northerly line of said North 150 feet [45.720 meters], said northerly line being the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Robert G. and Lorena Ramirez Ramos, recorded September 30, 1999, as Instrument 435799 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said northerly line also being the center quarter section line for said Section 10; thence westerly along said northerly line, South 89° 58' 59" West, 36.019 feet; thence South 10° 52' 39" West, 23.276 meters to a point on the southerly line of said North Half, said southerly line being the southerly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Robert G. and Lorena Ramirez Ramos, said southerly line also being the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Manual D. andCarolyn Ortiz, recorded March 5, 1999, as Instrument 090465 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along said last mentioned northerly and southerly line, North 89° 58' 59" East, 36.116 meters - to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 827.5 square meters (8,907 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). - The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 54 08-RIV-74-36.B-13705 (13705-1) This real prep • descript ark has t -en .:' f'by me, or under my direction, in conformance Signat LIC Date: OHN IMIBIOIRSKI, L. SE EXPIRES 9130/01 55 • • • WIL550W.E1 91369614APPIAGPEED3113 XS DX SCALED IrWOO N'LY LIME OF GRANT DEED TO ROBERT G. A LORENA R. RAMOS PER INST.Ie6906 O.R. REC. IIAY IZ, t99® FMS 68/80 S'LY LANE OF GRANT DEED TO ROBERT G. i LORENA R. RAMOS PER HST. 106906 O R REC. MAY tZ. 6998 CENTER OUARTER SECTION LINE t SECTION IC S89'S8 9"16 36 019m 0, N'LY LINE OF DEED TO MANUAL 0. & CAROLYH ORTiZ PER NW. 90465 O.R. REC. WAR. 5, I999 NOV SB'S9'E 36.16m POB N HALF Ltd Ct N89`52'4Z`E I2LTTarn NE 114; SE J/4; SEC 10 T5S y R4W; Sf M PM 9921 PM 4/24;25 /// Associated En veers, inc. 3311 EAST S$E1.8Y STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL (9091 98OJ1982 *AXt 1909144E-0891 COUNTY RIVERS OE ROUTE KLOPOST 14 316/40.2 AREA PARCEL ficia 5Oi11ARE FEET' SQUARE II4 TFRSr 13705-1 890T 827.5 `'gym L30.). JO' R444 007 l� 5 75./9 c_ SHEET I OF IMP MARGARTH ST „--R/W 11 R/W EXIST MARGARTH ST h 3`S5'04" R-340.2I2m L -23.263m sEe 11 T5S R4W &BM THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR F: 13705-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the North Half of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California,, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, excepting therefrom the East 1,059 feet [322/88 meters] thereon, also excepting therefrom that certain 20 feet [6.096 meters] strip along the North and West Lines, reserved for road purposes as described in a Trust Transfer Deed to Bessie Ann Watkins, recorded August 24, 1993, as Instrument 329896 of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows_ Commencing at the West Quarter Corner of said Section as shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 104, Page 39 of Records of Survey in said Office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along the center quarter section line and the centerline of Margarth Street (20.00 feet half width) [6.096 meters] as shown on said Record of Survey, North 89° 43' 3T East, 3.486 meters to a point on the easterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Record of Survey, said point being on a curve concave westerly having a radius of 358.500 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 81° 45' 58" East; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 000 59' 11" an arc length of 6.172 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Margarth Street, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, a radial line through said point bears South 80° 46' 47 East; thence continuing southerly along said easterly line and said curve through a central angle of 01° 16' 15" an arc length of 7.951 meters; thence North 76° 29' 46" East, 34.196 meters to a point on said southerly line of Margarth Street; thence westerly along said southerly line, South 89° 43' 37" West, 31.891 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 124.7 square meters (1,342 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Margarth Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.8-13706 (13706-1) This real property description has been prepay b conformance with Prolesiona and rve .•+< '4 Signature Date: IMBIO L.S. 4430 LIC• EXPIRES 8/30/01 me, or under my direction, in 57 .1:Y997. 3dv4Wil* €E➢S}1Tit1G.E O SHEET 1 OF I • LOT JJ BLOCK C SCALEt IiSOO w Cld IMP MARGARTH ST MAP OP GOOD HOF'E ACRES ADDITION NO.. 2 MB 12/4-6 POC wI/ coo BK 104/39 RS A.00 59V' R=358,50 -Om 1_ .172m TPOB AEI'i615" R=358.500m. L•T.95im SE I/4; } SEC O r55; R4W; ISBM I 1489' 43`3T"E 3.486 689'43`37" w 31.891m X07 cr cl ct- to u) Associated Engineers, Inc. 33I1 EAST S1EL8Y STREET ONTARIO, CA 9(164 TEL.. (9091 480-1962 FARM (9091 941-089t DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 441 AREA PARCEL Hos 13706-I SQUARE FFET1 1342 PM 6262 PMP 22/-'9 MITER oUARTER SECTION LUE SECTION R R/W EXIST MARGARTH ST 5'LY LRE MARC ARFH ST NW 1/4; SW 1/4; SEO 11 15Sy f 4Wy SIAM THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BYL0000SE TO OBTAIN GR LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13706-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Managernent, as said land being described in a Quitclaim Deed to Della B. Robinson, recorded June 4, 1996, as Instrument 207254 of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom the easterly 50 feet (15.240 meters) thereof conveyed to the County of Riverside for road purposes, recorded September 20, 1949, in Book 1109, Page 276 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Comrnencing at the northeasterly corner of said land, said corner being on the westerly line of Theda Street (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters] as the centerline of said Theda Street is shown as the east line of said section on Parcel Map No. 6338, filed in Book 17, Page 49 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, thence southerly along said westerly line, South 00° 13' 03" West, 7.913 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said westerly line, South 00° 13' 03" West, 38.038 meters to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 14.399 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 12° 25' 03" West; thence northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 107° 49' 53" an arc length of 27.099 meters; thence North 30° 14' 56" East, 15.544 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 29.698 meters; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 07° 07' 04" an arc length of 3.689 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 273.7 square meters (2,946 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Theda Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.9-13709 (13709-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Signature Date: I, L.S. 4430 EXPIRES 9/30/01 59 N:1551iirocip r 13705.000 w'LT LINE OF T1iEMA STREET i w'LY LINE OF 50` OF LAM TO CO. OF RiV. FOR ROAD PURPOSES PER BR 1109f2TG O.R.. REC. 9-20-49 POC NE'LY COR OF LAND TO BELLA B. ROOiNSON PER EST. 20T254 0.R.. REC. 6-4-95 SCALEI 11500 TPOB Gp31'0104" R=29.698 m L=3.6B9 m SE 114; NE 114 SEC71 oN 1 D 755; f 4W f SEW Associated Engineers, Inc 33R EAST SIELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9[T54 TEL. (909) 980-1992 FAX. (9$9) 941-0991 r.Ctdr+ rnfnfTv q'fff1Ty- nancT 6.240 m a 1 - AREA PARCEL No.e 137094 SQUARE FEET, 2446 SHEET 1 OF 1 944 Ai J! f &AO _U Q c3, try 1, THE BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED if ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 6983. ZONE G. MILTIPMplsTANcEp SHOWN BY 1.00 ' 30 TO OBTAIN GR I LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13709-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCR1PT1ON • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the southerly 95 feet [28.956 meters] of Lot 12, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, said land being described in a Grant Deed to Will Fenner et. al., recorded August 11, 1953, as Instrument 39394 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows_ BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot 12, said corner being on the easterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres, said corner being the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 427.501 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 89° 30' 30" West; thence northerly along said easterly line, the westerly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 03° 53' 00" an arc length of 28.975 meters to the northwesterly corner of said southerly 95 feet (28.956 meters]; thence easterly along the northerly line of said southerly 95 feet [28.956 meters], said northerly line being the southerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Salvador and Olga Madrigal, recorded October 11, 1989, as instrument 351282 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, South 89" 30' 46" East, 18.155 meters; thence South 10° 44' 31" West, 29.423 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89° 30' 47" East, 13.900 meters from said southwesterly corner; thence westerly along said last mentioned southerly line, North 89° 30' 47" West, 13.900 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 468.8 square meters (5,046 square feet). TOGETHER with tee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances, 08-RIV-74-37.0-13713 (13713-1) This real property description has been prepared by me or under my direction, in. conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor A Signature; Dater A Exp`'' s 9/30/01 RSKI, L.S. 4430 61 E[)511371]-I.c« 15.240 m (50'1 9.14 (30'1 SCALES It500 0 CC cJ 1 i i 9.141 m (7D� -1 6 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9IT64 TEL. (9091 990-1962 FAX, (909) 941-0991 nrrtRIrT CM NT'', ROUTF 14I CPOST EU 589'30'46"E 18.55 in AREA PARCEL Hoa SOUARE FEETI 13T13-1 5046 SHEET 1 OF 1 L01 12 • S'LY LINE. OF LAM TO SALVADOR A OLGA MADRIGAL PER HST. 351292 0.., REC. I0 -I-59 ALE= 771 rC MAP 0 1000 HOP ADJ E9 i\n0i-r1 dN NO , 2 1\4 1214 Ll 11 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1993, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY IJgTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0000' • 30 TO OBTAIN GROU 11* VEL DISTANCES.. PARCH.. 1371,3-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCR.1PT1ON • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 14, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fled in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive)of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot 14, said comer being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide)[18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 14° 25' 58" East., 62.980 meters to the northwesterly comer of said Lot, thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot, North 89° 39' 30" East, 27.482 meters; thence South 16° 41' 55" West, 63.723 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot, said point being distant easterly thereon, North 89" 43' 24" East, 24.870 meters from said southwesterly comer,, thence westerly along said southerly line, South 89° 43' 24° West, 24.870 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 1594.7 square meters (17,165 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37,1-13716 (13716-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 63— PDR. LOT 9 rr SCALE. 11900 PDR. LoT 10 SW'LY COR LOT 14 Associated Engineers, Inc. 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAX* 19091 941-0691 1- 1489"39`30"E 27.482 9`43.24''W 24.BTOm LOT a DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST tra PARCEL No., 13716-1 MARE FEET, 17165 a SHEET OF 1 a 10 0) 10 rill LOT 15 N'LY LINE LOT 14 SILT Lk1E LOT 15 LOT 14 N'LY LINE PARCEL 1 SILY LOC LOT 14 LOT 13 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1903. ZONE G. MULTIPLY ppsT Sif0V!I BY 1,000' •30 TO OBTAIN CROUN I.E ISTAN - PARCEL- 13716-1_ ___ SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRI-PTION EXHIBIT "A„ Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 14, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive,,of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 14, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters) as shown on said Map of Good 1 -lope Acres; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly tine and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 14° 25' 58" East, 62.980 meters to the northwesterly corner of said Lot; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot, North 89° 39' 30" East, 27.482 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northerly line, North 89D 39' 30" East, 16.892 meters; thence South 18° 21' 43" West, 15.523 meters; thence North 73°18' 05" West, 15.700 meters; thence North 16° 41' 55"East, 10.566 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 207.1 square meters (2,229 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08 -RI V-74-37.1-13716 (13716-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act Date: 65 Yd 7, I I'/..f IT;•, SCALE. PDR, LDT 9 1 FOR LOT 10 SpopT CDR LOT 14 Associated Engineers, inc. NO 39.30•E 21.482 S99'43'24"71 2+LOT0m LOT B 1311 EAST Si-IELOY STREET ONrAR10, CA 9176! TEL. (909) 930-r982 r Axt 19091 911-0691 1 SHEET 1 OF 1 L DT 15 H'LY LIE LOT 14 STY LIE LOT 15 LOT 14 Fi^LY LIE PARCEL 1 59.Y LIFE LOT 14 10' LOT 13 THE BEARINGS ANA DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE fi. MULTIPLY OpI�STANCES SHOWN BY 1.00 TO OBTAIN OROUN6b.EVEL DISTANCES. PARCa HoJ 13116-( SOCfl.f'S FELTF 11165 PARCEL 13716-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY PT I rim 0 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 15, Block "0" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 15, said corner being on the southeasterly tine of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide)[18,288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 14" 25' 58" East, 62.868 meters to the northwesterly corner of said Lot; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot, North 89° 41' 33" East, 32,109 meters; thence South 18° 26' 01" West, 64.186 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot, said point being distant easterly thereon, North 89" 39' 30" East, 27.483 meters from said southwesterly corner; thence westerly along said southerly line, South 89° 39' 30" West, 27.483 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • Containing approximately 1811.2 square meters (19,496 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1,00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.2-13721 (13721-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 67 V`.'•3 1734 Ft APPLNGVEEDi\137i1.D C SCALE= r lc. EXIST THEDA ST I' 800 LOT 8 POR, LOT 9 FOR. LOT J Q ?Z: et 1- OQi .44 V /r A � A f' T 047 r r f / 1' NB3' 41'33"E 32.109m Cj3T21-i) 582'39'301V 27.463m P08 5/PLY CDR LOT 15 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 FAST SHELBY STREET ONTARt0. CA 91764 TEL. 19091 990-1982 FAX' [9091 941-0891 TTIICT COUNTY ROUTE tt °POST SHEET I OF 1 • M't,Y LINE LOT 15 S'LY U E LOT 16 LOT 15 • LOT 14 AREA PARCEL Nos I3T21-1 SQUARE FEET: 19496 N1Y LIKE LOT 14 S1r LIE LOT 5 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUNe s EVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13721-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 15, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2; situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 15, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence easterly along the southerly line of said lot, North 89° 39' 30" East, 27A83 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said southerly line, North 89° 39' 30" East, 16.892 meters; thence North 18° 21' 43" East, 0.484 meters; thence North 73°18' 05" West, 16.000 meters; thence South 18° 26' 01 West, 5.437 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 47.4 square meters (510 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.2-13721 (13721-2) This real property description has been prepared by tree, or under my direction,, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 69 M:1941371Fwr 1 nG4DE ED5113 771 .7. W C SCALE" 1"800 LOT 8 Associated EnGineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY' STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. TSOS1 9130-1982 FAXt (9091 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ouTE XL POST TCE 3121-� SHEET 1 OF 1 • Lol J6 WLY LIFE LOT 15 S'LY L1E LOT 16 ii13' 18'05" W 16.000m Lc7 14 AREA PARCEL No4 13721-2 SQUARE FEET: 510 LOT 15 NB' 2Y43'1E 0.484m �ii LY U € LOT 14 • S'LY ME LOT IS THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. ANLTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUN EVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13721-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee CTPN 13726-1 LOT 17 IN BLOCK "C" OF GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO. 2 AS SHOWN BY MAPS ON FILE IN BOOK 12, PAGES 4, 5 AND 6 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND DEEDED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DOCUMENT RECORDED MARCH 17, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 49851, OFFICIAL RECORDS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK C, GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO. 2, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 12 OF MAPS, PAGES 4 THROUGH 6 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17 SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF EXISTING STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 74, 60,00 FEET WIDE, SHOWN AS "COUNTY HIGHWAY" ON SAID MAP; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 36° 21' 28" EAST 53.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 36° 38' 58" WEST 62.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60° 30' 13" WEST 82.27 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1650 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE FROM A TANGENT BEARING SOUTH 30° 09' 37" WEST THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 150 52' 23", A DISTANCE OF 457.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14° 17' 14" WEST 91.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 16; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 890 43' 47" WEST 20.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID EXISTING SATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 74; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 14° 04' 04" EAST 298.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 686.78 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 35° 25' 46", A DISTANCE OF 424.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (345-080-047) 71 • 16A-45 345 -08 Cite a/ry 4/re 4176 0/41 IAi 1f3 444 aF 1 ! 4 J. Jr !tit If It. 31 BRA, Oar -014 3 2 ar.rse .-e+-erxEUCALYPTUS r .tti ss+.4a ,eLvzr.3 .t-43 44, sr 45,37! 44, n. 4r, sX 6r .d ir t R.5 36/60 M8. 12/4-6 GOOD HOP E ACRES ADD . NO2 em. 5 5/48 Pa rcel Map 9477 PM 14/58 " 6033 fit WI 4 APR& 134n 1. 75 *AG. 16 20 rrt.rs 19t • FOR. NW 1/4 SEC !t, T53. , R. 4W A VE. LD4 Td' PM a4/s4 L.L. r. !r# 16 MAPES : se t. R o' R GAO Ma.. e t r.+.. q ,. . tir✓+l. eti) @ 1 O.f>7 IY �, Rix edit rr' j� j �C�+' E61sAG• n rr rr a 1.63wL 22 Aso' 1� e4mac h .rf.+.r+ /�' �} Y.5' •rrj.c 21 lis.t a' sal t+' 16 +.ar "ic . 24 r 4R! 3 i' ti Ai" rff t4ro:, 1 Fe, •. 8 316. 4e , 4-4 1 Ibr1 �j�j [163 ,r.., or prr v 77 4-14 ,1 + BL R. 11. ,,r+ ` 6+ 1 1.63.'AG 27 r. rile telkG @ .ran' t, 4 76 w k 25 v s is lJ ti 121 + .mac 1 s.ernt• l+f r + 1221fC . c. . zB 20' r `1.,� 1 n i1t . Tt t 1off .p a: ltl. re' .9 OS rJ' l..0 ,4" • 0 .4 ASSESSO R'S MAP 83 45 R. C. OS RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF , eG • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 2, as shown on Parcel Map 11505, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fried in Book 56, Pages 30 and 31 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 2, said corner being the northwesterly corner of Lot 17, Block B of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 2, and the northeasterly tine of said Lot 17, South 594 05' 55" East, 146.901 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southeasterly along said southwesterly and northeasterly line, South 59° 05' 55" East, 10.801 meters to the southwesterly corner of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded December 9, 1982 as Instrument 212814 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, North 40° 36' 47" East, 22.659 meters; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Grant Deed to the State of California, North 05° 15' 59" West, 6.094 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line, North 50° 08' 05" West, 4.891 meters; thence South 43° 22" 18" West, 28.693 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 266.8 square meters (2,872 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described properly in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08 -RV -74-37.8-13751 (13751-1) This real property description has been prepared by rne, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: Date: 73 199132N APPINS'`..OEED9a3757.ECC SHEET 1 OF 1 ALI< D DDDD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 2 MO 12/4-6 LO1 f a 0 SCALE: Ir50O PRA PM NO, 11505 ra �-y J RA 5 3o -3 I y` R 1 'i s DO a �O. E { i7. 0 POC o SW CDR PARCEL 2 PARCEL 2 s5-3. Zrr(r - 40e -a 04AQ 4 (O •Spry rl r,64 LOT 17 82 TPOB iL mac Associated Engineers, Inc. 33A EAST SFEL$Y STREET ONTARIO. CA 91T64 TEL. t9091 490--I9 B2 FAX: 1501 941-Q891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KR.OPOST OS RIVERSnnE 11 33.6/40.2 PARCEL 1 AREA. PARCEL. No 13751-1 SOUARE FEET' 2.872 SQUARE METERS' 266.5 1 1 r 14 • it az- a THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE fi. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY400009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR+ L 13751-1 410 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 2, as shown on Parcel Map 11505, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 56, Pages 30 and 31 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly comer of said Parcel 2, said comer being the northwesterly corner of Lot 17, Block B of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 2, and the northeasterly line of said Lot 17, South 59° 05' 55" East, 146.901 meters; thence North 43" 22' 18' East, 5.231 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 43" 22' 18" East, 10.000 meters; thence North 46" 37' 42" West, 25.000 meters; thence South 43" 22' 18" West, 10.000 meters; thence South 46" 37' 42" East, 25.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 250.0 square meters (2,691 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first orciirs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.5-13751 (13751-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: Date: 01:469173 r NGV-E cuzxia.DOC 75 i r ► THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF I9B3. ZONE 6.. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 36, Block "B", as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most easterly corner of Lot 36, as shown said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 36, North 58° 29' 06" West, 102.296 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 88° 34' 44" West, 11.954 meters; thence South 48' 01' 19" West, 23.553 meters to a point on the southeasterly dine of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] formerly known as County Highway, as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres, said point also being the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 165.702 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 70° 41' 15" West; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and along said curve, through a central angle of 10° 08' 51", an arc length of 29.347 meters to the most northerly corner of said Lot 36; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line of Lot 36, South 58° 29' 06" East, 20.362 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 217.2 square meters (2,338 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.8-13754 (13754-1) This real property description has b -en prepared by with the Professio Land Srvey A Date: H.I99136µuPP W [lC»5113751. o9C or under my direction, in conformance 77 SHEET i OF 1 * 141 -J d c�s LOT 19 PARCEL 1 PM 11505; FMB 56130-31 007 4( yak,i(// IL 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL 19091 980-1982 FAX 19091 941-0891 Associated Engineers, Inc. G=l0'08'sr' Rr165.702m L=29.347 m 5 SEE DETAIL 588'34'44"W L954 m TPOB LOT 36 (44 LOT 35 q- 10). •Yar.t- • LOT 35 P©C MOST PLY COR LOT 36, BLOCK "6" GOOD ;HOPE ACRES ADD 1 T J ON NO. 2; SLO C1< 'B' ma 1214 - THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE B. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 316/40,2 PARCEL Nos 13754-1 SQUARE FEET: 2338 SQUARE'ETERS: 217.2 PARCH 13754-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A„ Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 36, Block "B" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most easterly corner of Lot 36, as shown said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 36, North 58° 29' 06" West, 102.296 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 88° 34' 44" IlVest, 5.517 meters; thence South 58° 28' 52" East, 12.180 meters; thence North 310 30' 46" East, 3.000 meters to a point on said northeasterly line of said Lot 36; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line, North 580 29' 06" West, 7.550 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 29.6 square meters (319 square feet). The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances_ 08-RIV-74-37.8-13754 (13754.2) This real property description has been prepared b e or under nay direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Sury ors ct. Date: 419413 EVMAPPIN 175q-2.DOC 79 7 SHEET 1 OF 1 L01 19 PARR L PM 11505 PMD 56130-3 / 1 / \ / \ / ti / / TPOB Lai' 35 T.550 m SCALES 11500 • POC MOST E'LY 4tz COR LOT 36. �o qtr aLOC ""B° N3I'30'46"E LOT 36 3m" GOOD HOPE ADREs ADD. T 1 DN No, 2 y DLo cK ° D ME 1214-6 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COOROINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. klik 3311 EAST SFELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. 4909) 980-962 FAX: 1909) 941-0891 Associated Engineers, inc. DISTRICT 06 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KILOPOST 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.a SQUARE FEET: SQUARE METERS: 13754-2 319 29.6 PAR 13754-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 19, Block "B", as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Deed to Hideaki Nakamura as Trustee, recorded May 18, 1990, as Instrument 183865 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded December 22, 1982, as Instrument 221124 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, also excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded April 19, 1973, as Instrument 50140 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 19, said corner being on the southerly line of Betty Street (30.00 feet half width) [9.144 meters] as described in said Deed to the County of Riverside; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 39° 43' 21" East 325.723 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly line, South 39° 43' 21" East, 7.801 meters to the most northerly corner of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded November 16, 1982, as Instrument 198484 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said last mentioned most northerly corner being on a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 624.841 meters, a radial line through said corner bears North 41° 1T 09" West; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said land granted to the State of California and said curve through a central angle of 020 48' 48" an arc length of 30.681 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said land granted to Hideaki Nakamura, said southwesterly line being the northeasterly tine of land described in a Deed to Alexander Garcia and Maria D. Garcia, recorded September 9, 1997, as Instrument 327782 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line and said last mentioned northeasterly line, North 41° 51' 45" West, 11.691 meters; thence South 89° 13' 20" East, 6.340 meters; thence North 46° 18' 00" East, 26.316 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 238.2 square meters (2,564 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-23.6-13756 (13756-1) This real properly •-scription has a een prepare by conformance wit t Profe •n , `a urve Signature: Date: e or under my direction„ in Expi 0 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE' 11500 LOT c_ EXIST BETTY STREET L E. 6 r rt 0E. N a 4b _ i° - D+ m - - -- _ S'LY LINE OF BETTY STREET PER - _ - �` INST. N0. 50140 0.R.. REC. 4-19-1973 I I I —,_ POC � `Ik,‘ N'LY COR LOT 19 s. BLOCK "B', PER 701_ MAP OF GOOD HOPE ACRES, c?, -, ADDITION NO. 2. MB 12/4-6 LOT 20 NE'LY LINE OF LOT 19 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADD 1 T 1 ON NO, 2; BLOCK MB 12/4-b NE'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO ALEXANDER GARCIA & 1.440 D. GARCIA AS INST. NO. 321182 REC. 9-9-199T TPOB SW'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO HIDEAKI NAKAMURA AS INST. NO. 183865 0.R.. �ra� REC. 5-16-1990 't r? i Associated Engineers, inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91154 Ta.. (9091 960-1982 FAX/ (9091 94F-0891 r r B AREA PARCEL Ho.1 13156-1 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST SQUARE FEET' 2.564 • N'LY COR OF LAND GRANTED 10 STATE OF CALIF. AS INST. NO.198484 0,R.. REC. II -16-1982 NW'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO STATE OF CALIF. AS INST. NO.198484 D.R., REC. M-16-1982 i • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L000024/0 TO OBTAIN GROIINO. VEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13756-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Being a portion of Lot 19, Block "B", as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Deed to Hideaki Nakamura as Trustee, recorded May 18, 1990, as Instrument 183865 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Deed to the State of California, recorded December 22, 1982, as instrument 221124 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, also excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded April 19, 1973, as Instrument 50140 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 19, said corner being on the southerly line of Betty Street (30.00 feet half width) [9.144 meters] as described in said Deed to the County of Riverside; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 39'143' 21" East 325.723 meters; thence South 46° 18' 00" West, 14.978 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 46° 18' 00" West, 11.338 meters; thence North 89° 13' 20" West, 6.340 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said land granted to Hideaki Nakamura, said southwesterly tine being the northeasterly line of land described in a Deed to Alexander Garcia and Maria D. Garcia, recorded September 9, 1997, as Instrument 327782 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line and said last mentioned northeasterly line, North 41° 51' 45" West, 21.569 meters; thence North 46° 18' 00" East, 16.004 meters; thence South 41° 51' 45" East, 26.013 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 405.8 square meters (4,368 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.9-13756 (13756-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Lan. Surveyors Act. Signature: y Date: •�h"I * ' I R . . 4430 Expires 9 0/01 11:159i11APOR 11 Wr 6-4C0C Or e CD LICI O w 0 [V EXIST BETTY STREET A E Y 61 a SHEET 1 OF 1 • S'LY UNE OF BETTY STREET PER — - INST. NO. 50140 O.R., REC. 4-19-1973 f" OC N'LY COR LOT 19 • BLOCK "13', PER NE'LY LINE OF LOT 19 v. I.IAP OF G000 HOPE ACRES, s3. ADDITION NO. 2, MB 12/4-6 SW'LY LINE OF GOOD HOPE ACRES LAND GRANTED u TO HIDEAKI NAKAMURA ADD J 7 1 ON NO , 2; DLCGJ a A5 INST. NO.183865 O.R., MEI J2/4-6 REC. 5-18-1990 LOT 19 TPO/3 /q\,o NE'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO ALEXANDER GARCIA & MADIA D. GARCIA AS INST. 110. 327182 O.R., REC. 9-9-1991 Associated Engineers,, Inc. 5311 EAST SHELBY STREET NT CA 91164 TEL (9091 950-1982 FAX!' (9091 941-0891 1 LOT 20 / r AREA PARCEL Naa 13756-2 SOME FEETi 4,368 / • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY ANNCES SHOWN BY LOO 0 TO OBTAIN GROUND) DISTANCES. PARCEL 13756-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY 1 FGA1 DFSeR I PT 1 ON .-.0 RATA c‘iteSe{ • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 20, Block B as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2 situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 20; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 20, South 39° 43' 20" East, 325.723 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 39° 43' 20" East, 7.801 meters to the most westerly corner of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded November 12, 1982, as Instrument 196322 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said corner being the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 624.841 meters, a radial line through said corner bears North 41' 17' 09" West; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said, land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California and along said curve through a central angle of 01' 57' 33" an arc length of 21.367 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said northwesterly line, North 50° 40' 24" East, 43.591 rneters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 20; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line, North 39° 23' 22" West, 9.759 meters; thence South 07° 00' 36" West, 5.423 meters: thence South 52' 00' 24" West, 61.090 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 444.1 square meters (4.780 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.0-13757 (13757-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the rofessio al La • Su - ors Signature: Date: WASSCOASPCniM99138V4APPIP us, un,,on 85 BETTY STREET SCALE' I: 1000 Ilk 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (9091 9Bo-1482 FAXe (M) 941-0B91 0(STRICT 0B Associated Engineers, Inc. COUNTY RIYERSIOE ROUTE RLOPOST 14 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.. 13757-1 SQUARE FEET: 4,780 SQUARE METERS: 444J SHEET 1 OF 1 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN 6Y 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13757-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 20, Block B as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2 situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows - Commencing at the most westerly comer of said Lot 20, thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 20, South 39° 43' 20" East, 325.723 meters; thence North 52° 00' 24" East, 19.057 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 52' 00' 24" East, 15.000 meters; thence North 37° 59' 36" West, 22.000 meters; thence South 52° 00' 24" West, 15.000 meters; thence South 37° 59' 36" East, 22.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 330.0 square meters (3,552 square feet). The easement herein granted shall became effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based an the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.0-13757 (13757-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors A Date: 87 VASSOCI 'EYa149L18VSAPPINGVDEW5413757.2,CD(1C #Y 1 SCALED WOOD BETTY STREET war , LOT 21 'tiQ, tit DLDCK 9 GOOD HOPE' ACR'E'S ADDITION NJD , 2 ma 12/4=6 LOT 20 POC LOT 19 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91761 TEL. 1909) 980-1902 FAX[ (49I 941-0891 DISTRICT CIA COUNTY ROUTE KIL0P0ST wvcctTC 7a aa.f./df5 7 (o A4 AREA PARC£L Noj 13757-2 SQUARE FEEL: 3.552 MOIRE 1A:TFRSe 330- i 7 q s SHEET 1 OF I LOT 22 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR t: 13757-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Y EXHIBIT "A" • • • Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 20, Block B as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2 situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 20; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 20, South 39° 43' 20" East, 325.723 meters; thence North 52° 00' 24" East, 55.114 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 52° 00' 24" East, 5.976 meters; thence North 07° 00' 36" East, 5.423 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 20; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line, North 390 23' 22" West, 9.168 meters; thence South 52° 00' 23" West, 9.586 meters; thence South 37 59' 3T East, 13.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 119.2 square meters (1,283 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V--74-38,0-13757 (13757-3) This real properly description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors t. Date: M:199t34V.LVPTM X13757-3. DOC 89 ';re LOT 21 \� > Loci B GOOD HOPE ACRE'S ADDITION NO, 2 1 MS 12/4-6 SHEET 1 OF C BETTY STREET SCALE' I Poc LOT 19 LOT 20 416 7, AtecIL / kik 338 EAST SIILBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. 5989) 96019B2 FAX, WI} 941-0x91 Associated Engineers, Inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSIDE 74 IUL0P0ST 334/40.2 AREA PARCEL Noa 13757-3 MIME FEET' 1,283 50UARE AETER& 119.2 T 22 THE HEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE G. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13757-3 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 34, Block B as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting thet'efrom the westerly 133.00 feet [40.538 meters], measured along the northerly line of said Lot 34, as described in a Grant Deed to Richard M. and Linda O'Grattis, recorded April 13, 1977, as Instrument 62421 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 34; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 34, North 390 20' 00" West, 176.553 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing northwesterly along said northeasterly line North 39° 20' 00" West, 13.202 meters to the southeasterly corner of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded June 17, 1983, as Instrument 120585 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence southwesterly along the southeasterly line of said land described in a Grant. Deed to the State of California, South 50° 40' 25" West, 24.381 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said land described in a Deed to Richard M. and Linda O'Grattis; thence southeasterly along said last mentioned northeasterly line, South 40° 57' 00" East, 7.840 meters; thence North 48° 54' 53" East, 14.022 meters; thence North 83° 13' 09" East, 10.812 meters; thence North 49° 30' 37" East, 1.032 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 215.3 square meters (2,317 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground 'level distances. 08-R1V-74-38.0-13759 (13759-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: Date: I :io- 1, L . 4430 /30/01 .Avef,c714:9,/ 91 LOT 32. SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE! I!f000 BLK S GOOD HOP ACRES ADDITION N0. 2 M9 12/46 1_OT 35 CMADELA1NE ST) MAPES ROAD Associated ated Engineers„ inc. 3311 EAST SFEU.13Y STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL (9O91980-1982 FAX! 19091141-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST PM. No.4 13159-1 SOIJARE FEET. 2.341 LOT 33 POc ELY ICOR LOT 34 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHo 11 BY 1.00002 TO TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13759-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION eNliare •+"Kale. • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 34, Block B as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6,inclusive,of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom the westerly 133.0 feet [40.538 meters], measured along the northerly line of said Lot 34, as described in a Grant Deed to Richard M. and Linda O'Grattis, recorded April 13, 1977, as Instrument 62421 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 34; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 34, North 39° 20' 00" West, 165.652 ureters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly line, North 39° 20' 00" West, 10.901 meters; thence South 49° 30' 37" West, 1.032 meters; thence South 83° 13' 09" West, 10.812 meters; thence South 48° 54' 53" West, 3.855 meters; thence South 41° 05' 07" East, 17.000 meters; thence North 48° 54' 53" East, 13.485 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 199.6 square meters (2,148 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-38.0-13759 (13759-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Signature: Date: /30/01 93 MA9713eVIAPPING 57,0x5?-ZoaC Ol5TWCT LOT 35 LOT 36 MAPES ROAD 1 Associated Engineers, Inc. COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST LOT 32 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALED 111000 BLK a GDDD HOP ACRES ADDITION No, 2 M8 12/4-6 (MADELAINE ST) PARCEL Nni 13759-2 SOUARE FEETt 2,148 C1 I1O tL1rD . IGQ G Et.Y tx LOT 34 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL. DISTANCES. PARCEL 13759.2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • • Fee Being a portion of Lot 21, Block "B", as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded April 19, 1973 as Instrument No. 50139 of Official Records, in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 21, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] formerly known as County Highway as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 21 and said northwesterly line, North 50° 37' 31" East, 45.669 meters to the most southerly corner of said grant to the County of Riverside; thence northwesterly along the southeasterly line of said grant to the County of Riverside, North 39° 18' 54" West, 38.248 meters; thence South 43° 08' 11" West, 25.134 meters; thence South 07° 39' 52" East, 20.127 meters; thence South 52° 00' 32" West, 8.000 meters, thence South 07° 00' 36" West, 3.063 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 21, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 39° 23' 22" West, 15.930 meters from said most southerly corner; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 39° 23' 22" East, 15.930 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 1,372.1 square meters (14,769 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Betty Road). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6 Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.0-13761 (13761-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyo s Act, Signatu Lice Date: 14190118VOPPINGWEEDS-111761.DOC n Imbiorski, L.S. 4430 expires 099/30/05 95 PARCEL 1 ' PM 11505$ PM$3 56/30- J LOT 21 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION' No. 2; sLocKme me J2/4-6 sw1Y LI LOT 21 C LOT 21 LOT 20 ilik 331 EAST s€L$T STREET °wavy.tt< 14T64 T1i..OOP 1IO-4 2 FAXL Mil 446-0641 Associatad Enulneera, Inc„. 9rSTNCT 04 [rxr+rY RIVERS -OE ROUTE Tt640sT 14 33.ir•r0,z LOT 22 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 2k BLt3CK Icy MB J 2/4--6 AREA PARCEL Wu 01761-1 LO.MAE rTIT, 14,76.3 SCOW METERS; I7T2.1 StT Cal. OF MT. E10. 5049 EIEC. 4 -11 -*T77 {rr 8 THE REARMS AND DISTANCES SEIOPON ARE BASED ON THE CAL FOFP A COORDINATE STST .t OF M/3, ZONE 6„, IJJ..TPtY MINCES SHOWN BY 400002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DWANC S. mica tweti SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • • Fee Being a portion of Lot 25, Block "B" as shown on the Map of Goad Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of sad County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 25, said point being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, North 39° 19' 52" West, 15.636 meters; thence South 579 23' 18" West, 6.458 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 884.442 meters; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 03° 32' 58", an arc length of 54.790 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot„ said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 390 19' 05" West, 21.160 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot 25; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 390 19' 05" East, 21.160 meters to said most southerly comer, said most southerly corner being on said northwesterly line of State Highway 74; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 25 and said northwesterly line, North 50° 37' 31" East, 60.995 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 1143.1 square meters (12,304 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.3-13770 (13770-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: M 991381MAFPUvf,IDE +Unaccc 97 1 ocx Al GOOD HOPE ACRES AMM ON NO, 2 MA 12I4 - LOT 25 SCALE: 1:500 LOT 24 116, 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9IT64 TEL.1909) 980-1982 FAX! 19091 941-0891 Associated Engineers, Inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOROST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/402 C 454 AREA PARCEL HO.: !3770-I SOUARE FEET: 12.304 SOLIARE METERS: 1.143.1 LOT 2e 09. WO - SHEET 1 OF 1 zl LOT 29 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1993. ZONE G. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL, 13770-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 qC Ec we, WI 2 e+ - - 6r • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 25, Block "B" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2. situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 25, said point being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, North 39° 19' 52" West, 15.636 meters; thence South 57° 23' 18" West, 6.458 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 884.442 meters; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 01° 04' 22", an arc length of 16.559 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, a radial line through said point bears North 33° 41' 05" West; thence continuing along said curve through a central angle of 01° 02' 11" an arc length of 16.000 meters; thence radial to said curve, North 34'' 43' 16" West, 13.147 meters; thence North 56° 18' 56" East, 16.237 meters; thence South 33" 41' 04" East, 13.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 210.3 square meters (2,264 square feet). The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-IRIV-74-38.3-13770 (13770-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature Date: M 99138{rwcPINKA EEDS)13770-Loa[ mbiroski, S. 4430 pires 09130105 99 SCALE. I:500 MS' .1 2y, a} ` 6 LOT 25 LDT 24 ICE Associated Engineers, inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 990-1992 FAX: (909) 94I-0991 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSIDE 74 KILOP0ST 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.: 13770-2 SQUARE FEET: 2,264 SQUARE METERS: 210.3 LOT 26 ti SHEET 1 OF 1 ELY COR LOT 25 LOT 29 c THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ",a ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. g. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR( 13770-2 41/1 n SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 28 and 29, Block `B", as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 29, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 29, South 39° 20' 37" East, 6.096 meters to a point of intersection with the southeasterly line of a Declaration of Dedication for public road purposes, recorded July 21, 1964, as Instrument 89310 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence northeasterly along said last mentioned southeasterly line, North 500 37' 30" East, 60.943 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 28, said point being the beginning of a curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 566.903 meters; thence northeasterly along said last mentioned southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of 06° 12' 17", an arc length of 61.392 meters to the most westerly comer of a Declaration of Dedication for public road purposes, recorded September 8, 1976, as Instrument 134163 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southeasterly along the westerly line of said last mentioned Declaration of Dedication, South 60° 48' 34" East, 12.355 meters to an angle point in said westerly line; thence southerly along said westerly line, South 00" 24' 07" West, 21.391 meters; thence South 56" 17' 59" West, 7.147 meters; thence North 78° 51' 22" West, 15.921 meters; thence South 57" 49' 3T' West, 96.574 meters to a point on said first mentioned southwesterly line, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 39° 20' 37" East, 12.256 meters from said most westerly corner of Lot 29; thence northwesterly along said first mentioned southwesterly line, North 39° 20' 37" West, 6.160 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing approximately 1,843.7 square meters (19,845 square feet), TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State E-tighway 74 and Marie Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.3-13771 (13771-1) This real property description ha me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professi I La Signature: Date: M:l!Y313ERWiPPING+IOEFA511]]7=. DOC foHN �g�-G� 3 NO. 4430 Exp. 09/30/05 101 DISTRICT 08 SCALE: 1:1000 LOT 25 1� "F3" GOOD ;-JDPE ACRES ADD 71 ON ND, 2 MB 12/4-i; LOT 30 LOT 2e Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAXt (909) 941-0891 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 74 KILOPOST 33.6/40.2 • • \ \ L0T 29 AREA PARCEL No.: 13171-1 SOUARE FEET; 19,845 SOUARE METERS: 1.843.7 LOT 27 4 yy6 �1�1 � LOT 28 7-3(5 in 5241 SHEET 1 OF 1 1— . w w m 1_ 1, _w Sr m 5;: L 6.096 m (209 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 5. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCE'S. PARCa 13771-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being that portion of Lot 29, Buck 'IT as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No_ 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Bock 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 29, said corner being on the southeasterly fine of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters; as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 29, South 390 20' 37" East, 12.256 meters; thence North 57" 49' 37" East, 5.829 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 57° 49' 37" East, 13.000 meters; thence South 32° 10' 23" East, 20.000 meters; thence South 57° 49' 37" West, 13.000 meters; thence North 32" 10' 23" West, 20.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 260.0 square meters (2,799 square feet). The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.3-13771 (13771-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. M;1,q,I JT,MAPPINCi {DEEDS‘17]A3-2COC 103 SHEET 1 OF 1 { *Y 6 SCALE: I:I 0 L©T 25 ELK "E" GOOD ADP ' r1G. Es ADDJTJON No. ma 1 /4- LDT 3o LDT 26 Associated Engineers inc. 338 EAST SHELBYSTREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL 19091 980-1982 FAX': 19091 941-0891 D4S TR1CT Ir8 COUNTY ROUTE ICILOP05T i1IVER5i0E 74 33.6140.2 LOT 29 Z t c AREA PARCEL 14o4 SQUARE FEET' SQUARE METERS: 13771-2 2,799 260.0 \ LOT 27 LOT 28 \ 7.315 m (24`r \ 1- vJ <41 L THE HEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 100002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEE1 13771-2 t ti - t SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY ha LEGAL DESCRIPTION 03' €M EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being those portions of Lots 28 and 29, Block "B" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 29, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 29, South 390 20' 37" East, 12.256 meters; thence North 57" 49' 37" East, 51.456 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 57" 49' 37" East, 20.000 meters; thence South 32" 10' 23" East, 12.000 meters; thence South 57° 49' 37" West, 20.000 meters; thence North 32° 10' 23" West, 12.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 240.0 square meters (2,583 square feet). The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. O8-RIV-74-38.3-13771 (13771-3) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. t Signature. Date: n, 991JB4ra1P41NGIDEFp5\13771-]1i4]C N0.4430 Exp. 09130105 105 SCALE. 1; t000 LOT 25 kik 33U EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 990-19B2 FAXe 19091 94I-0691 LOT 30 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OE 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. DISTRICT OR COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KLOPOST 74 33.6/40.2 0 0 LOT 25 AREA PARCEL No.: SQUARE FEET: SQUARE I1ETERS: 13771-3 2,583 240.0 LOT 27 44 4°A; LOT 28 • 7.315 in (2t') 6.096 m 120'1 ra SHEET 1 OF 1 PARC 613771-3 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 4, as shown on Parcel Map 10607, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 57, Page 51 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 4, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map, said corner being the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 597.383 meters, a radial line through said corner bears North 33° 53' 25" West; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line, the southeasterly line of said Parcel and said curve through a central angle of 00° 55' 18" an arc length of 9.610 meters; thence North 77° 24' 51" West, 12.110 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Parcel, said southwesterly line being the northeasterly line of Lot 26, Block B as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, Inclusive of Maps in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly and northeasterly line, South 25° 35' 16" East, 8.796 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 41.7 square meters (449 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property In and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Marie Street). The bearings and .distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.3-13773 (13773-1) This real property description has been prepared b e, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Survey Date: 107 PCL- 4 PM 10607; PM9 51151 SIY'LY LINE OFPa4 0 I NE"LY CiNE OF LOT 26. BLOCK B. COOT? HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO.2 MB 12/4-6 LOT 26 SLOGW< E GOOD HOPE ACRES AUDITION NO. 2 ME 12/4-6 1 Associated Engineers, inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91?64 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAxr (904r 941-0891 O6STRICT COMITY ROUTE XLOPOST OR RIYERSOE YA 33.6mo' SE'LY LONE OF PCL 4 �A,=00.55.118" R=597.383m L=9.610m f"- S'LY COR OF PCL 4, PM 10607. MD 57/51 I w1 -- I 1- 13.411m 14.096,T (44') , ,( 1- W I 120') CC Q 19 XI cal! • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 0983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00402470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL No. 13773-1 SQUARE FEET: 449 SOUARE METERS! 417 PARCEL 13773-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 4, as shown on Parcel Map 10607, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 57, Page 51 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 4, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map, said comer being the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 597.383 meters, a radial line through said corner bears North 33° 53' 25" West; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line, the southeasterly line of said Parcel and said curve through a central angle of 01 ° 16' 53" an arc length of 13.361 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, a radial line through said point bears North 32° 36' 32" West, thence continuing northeasterly along said northwesterly and southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 57 33" an arc length of 10.000 meters; thence North 32° 36' 42" West, 6.296 meters; thence South 57° 23' 18" West, 10.000 meters; thence South 32° 36' 42" East, 6.212 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 62.4 square meters (672 square feet).. The easementheroin granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.3-13773 (13773-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Ac WISZCIACPCFB-61191 ura wE£0surrn-x c 109 NE'LY LINE OF LOT 26. BLOCK 6, GOOD HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO.2 MB 12/4-6 LOT 26 MOCK H GOOD HOPE ACRES ADD1TJON NO 2 MD 1214--6 P D . 4 PM 1060/; FM0 51/51 WO LINE OF PCL 4 532; 36'42' N32'36' Ilk Associated Engineers, Inc.. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTAI110, CA 91764 TEL. 190913/0-1982 FAX* 14091141-0691 01STIOCT c0UNTT ROUTE 16LOPOST 08 MYERS OE 14 33.6/40.2 5^44 Le01' 16'53" R=597.383m s ' L-13.36Im TPOB aq s'LY COR OF PCL 4, PM 10607. PMB 57/51 2 13.411m 6.096m 7P-1-4120'1 u.I �I 6.096m 16.096m (20') • LI' THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL Noa 13713-2 SQUARE FEEL 672 MARE METERS: 62.4 PAneriL 13773-2 0 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 22, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 22, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 15° 43' 54" East, 21.231 meters; thence North 48° 27' 32° East, 15.173 meters; thence North 57°° 23' 18" East, 29.648 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 27° 43' 48" East, 14.430 meters from the most northerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly Tine, North 27° 43' 48" West, 14.430 meters to said most northerly corner, said corner being on southeasterly line of State Highway 74, said most northerly corner also being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 591.287 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 280 30' 35" East; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 01° 15' 3T an arc length of 13.005 meters; thence continuing along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, South 62° 45' 02" West, 26.858 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 696.6 square meters (7,498 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1'V-74-38.4-13776 (13776-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional La . Surveyors A Date: 111 t. SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE' 111000 —15-16.096m 101-4 (20'? LLI LtJ CC F-- L+J CC 6.096m (201 W LT COR LOT 22 GOOD HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO.1, 14.13.11/87 PIL IXSTRICT 08 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL (9091 990-1982 EAX4 1909) 941-0891 COUNTY RFYERSIOE ROUTE KLOPOST T4 33.6/40.2 • LOT 3 • LOT 21 GOOD HOPE ACRES A0.01 T ] ON NO I MS 11187 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL Nos SQUARE EEL SQUARE NETERSI 13TT6-I 7,498 696.6 PARCEL 13776-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 22, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 22, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 15° 43' 54" East, 21.231 meters; thence North 48° 27' 32" East, 3..02E meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 48° 27' 32" East, 12.147 meters; thence South 32° 36' 42" East, 15.000 meters; thence South 57° 23' 18" West, 12.000 meters; thence North 32° 36' 42" West, 13.115 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 168.7 square meters (1,816 square feel). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-38.4-13776 (13776-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: Date: 'I' k99 [s6WL,PPIK CCU/SW-176 zoos 113 • LOT 3 .--.r-r 6.096m 120'1 6.096m am �Iv 1209 y1Y'LY COR LOT 22 GOOD HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO. 1, ma. N/87 LOT 1 LOT 23 LOT 2 N,c0 6' s4, LOT 22 Associate! Engineers, Inc. 33tt EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 960-1982 FAX, (909) 913-0691 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KL0P0ST O6 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 Fn g. Ai \1 ti'.4e,‘ 0 LOT 21 GOOD HOPE AcREe ADD J T J DN NO J J ma 11/87 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON • THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL No.1 13776-2 SOME FEEL 1.816 SOIJARE METERS! 168.7 P 13776-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCR1PTION • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 21, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in theunincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Joe Eddie Birdo, et.al., recorded February 16, 1996, as Instrument 57928 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 21, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18,288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 27° 43' 48" East, 14.430 meters; thence North 57° 23' 18" East, 36.408 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Joe Eddie Birdo, et. al., said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Louis J. Mercado, recorded August 23, 1984, as Instrument 184671 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly and southwesterly line, North 370 18' 53" West, 12,964 meters to a point on said southeasterly line, said point being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 591.287 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 31' 49' 09" East; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 03° 18' 34" an arc length of 34.153 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 476.7 square meters (5,120 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.5-13777 (13777-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 115 $4A991796NIAPPIH4,WEEDS 0777.000 SHEET 1 OE • a a w 4 Vl —�I 6.036m 6.096m PI. -} LOT 1 I' fX r PQS MNLY COR LOT 21 GOOD HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO.!. M.B. II/87 LOT 23 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAX (9091 941-0891 ORSTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 334/40.2 LOT 2 LOT 22 NO LOT 3 ec \,j' 4w-- �.Ni 6qti 4115 05/0 ss ` Ell LOT 21 '90 (Pe G+ � 4y• DDan HOPE NO, ADDITION /N —Ora 1 ma 1 1 J CJ J THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL No. SOUAf( F'EETI SQUARE I1 TE St (3777-I 5,120 475.7 PARCEL 13777-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 21, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Joe Eddie Bird°, et.al., recorded February 16, 1996, as Instrument 57928 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 21, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters) as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 27° 43' 48" East, 14.430 meters; thence North 570 23' 18" East, 3.246 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 57° 23' 18" East, 10.000 meters; thence South 32° 36' 42" East, 6.000 meters; thence South 57° 23' 18" West, 10.000 meters; thence North 32° 36' 42" West, 6.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 60.0 square meters (646 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RI11-74-38.5-13777 (13777-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, r under my direction, in conformance with t e Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 1\ASSOCOPEVvJIvsl tAllnh u>ElEDsuxm-11CC 117 SHEET 1 OE 1 6.096m (20l PUC WIT COR LOT 21 GOOD HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO.1. M.B. II/67 LOT LOT 23 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY I.000024TO TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SFELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. 19099 9804992 FAX' (909) 941-0891 04S TRIO T 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KLOPOST 74 33.6/40.2 TPOB LOT 2 tarit VC LOT 22 AREA PARCQ No.e SQUARE FEET. SQUARE METERS. 13777-2 646 SO.O LOT 3 \ -03TTT=_Z• tT LOT 21 f. CDDD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO4 1 MJ J J / 87 PARCEL 13777-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 21, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Joe Eddie Birdo, et.al., recorded February 16, 1996, as Instrument 57928 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 21, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.'288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 27° 43' 48" East, 14.430 meters; thence North 57° 23' 18" East, 27.997 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 57° 23' 18" East, 8.411 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Joe Eddie Bird°, et. al., said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Louis J. Mercado, recorded August 23, 1984, as Instrument 184671 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence southeasterly along said northeasterly and southwesterly line, South 370 18' 53" East, 6.020 meters; thence South 57° 23' 18" West, 8.905 meters; thence North 32° 36' 42" West. 6.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 51.9 square meters (559 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California " Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIU-74-38.5-13777 (13777-3) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyo. Act. Date: M:15.9116V4APFINGNOGEDSLUT77-3 GO: 119 SHEET 1 OF 1 • 0 0 0 J { 6.096m 420'1 6 (20').096m ► F� POC W'LY COR LOT 21 GOOD HOPE ACRES. ADDITION NO.1. A#.H.11/81 LOT 1 LOT 23 Associated Engineers. Inc. 3310 EAST SF€L$Y STREET QNTAR10, CA 90764 TEL. 0909) 980-1982 FAX 1909) 941-0091 DISTRICT 00 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KL0P0ST 74 33_g/40.2 LOT 2 LOT 42 LOT 3 Ri.5.vos .p-rie ? -35 LOT 21 a c \ R.S. 61/31111 R1Y. 00. LOT 20 DDDD HOP ADf ES ADDITION NOa 1 J � J J/ T7 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL No.0 5QUARE FEET SQUARE I TfRSs 13771-3 559 51.9 PARCEL 13777-3 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 2, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California,, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office' of the County Recorder of said County,. as described in a Grant Deed to Gwinn B. and Nellie R. Girard, recorded April 26, 1976, as Instrument 55235 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] formerly known as County Highway, as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, North 36° 20' 35" West, 10.837 meters; thence North 57° 23' 18" East, 22.913 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Gwinn 8_ and Nellie R. Girard, said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Julia Saidana„ recorded September 21, 1967, as Instrument 83146 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southeasterly along said last mentioned northeasterly and southwesterly line, South 36° 19' 44" East, 11.180 meters to the most easterly corner of said land described in a Grant Deed to Gwinn B. and Nellie R Girard, said corner being on said northwesterly line of State Highway 74, said corner also being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 572.999 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 32° 54' 08" East; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line, the southeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Gwinn B. and Nellie R. Girard and said curve through a central angle of 02° 17' 37" an arc length of 22.937 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 253.4 square meters (2,728 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RiV-74-38.4-13778 (13778-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature - Date IV 659C1,EFcF1LE519v13G1 t AABEI \1377S.VJC rr %17 121 *Y SCALE: 1.500 GOOD HOPE ACRE'S ADDITION NO J l MS II/91 LOT 2 C Associated Engineers, Inc. ]ail EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91754 TEL, (9091 980-1482 FAX. (9091 941-089i O6TRICT COUNTY ROUTE AILOROST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.5/40,2 LOT 21 AREA PARCEL NO.a 13718-1 SQUARE FEET. 2,728 SQUARE METERS. 253.4 LD7 3 -0Q 5' -0A c SHEET 1 OF I lej LOT 20 \ \ \ THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARC. E2 13778-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 2, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Gwinn B. and Nellie R. Girard, recorded April 26, 1976, as Instrument 55235 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] formerly known as County Highway, as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly fine of said Lot 2, North 36° 20' 35" West, 10.837 meters; thence North 57° 23' 18" East, 9.452 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 57° 23' 18" East, 10.000 meters; thence North 32° 36' 42" West, 10.000 meters; thence South 57° 23' 18" West, 10.000 meters; thence South 32° 36' 42" East, 10.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 100.0 square meters (1,076 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.4-13778 (13778-2) • This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction,, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors ct. Date: MA991JHIfUP9ING1 A1177h6L00 123 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALES I) 500 GOOD J-JDF No. Ann! J !' ON N©a J JS 1i/a7 LOT 2 ��`S fQ Sc"‘ O tAb TQa LOT 21 LOT 3 ti THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CAUFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1483. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN 8Y L00002470 TO OBTAIN MOUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AssocIsted Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. MOM 980-1982 FAX. 4909) 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL Na.r 13778-2 SOUARE FEET' 4076 SOUARE METES' 100.0 PAN . 13778-2 0 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 0 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 14, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder 01 said County, as described in Quitclaim Deeds to Willie A. Jones, recorded November 13, 1980, as Instruments 212165 and 212166 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) (18.288 meters] formerly known as County Highway, as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 36° 19' 05" East, 14.672 meters; thence South 47° 34' 30" West, 61.388 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 36° 19' 42" East, 21.093 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 36° 19' 42" West, 21.093 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line, said corner also being on a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 1737.104 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 36° 53' 28" West; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 00° 32' 39" an arc length of 16.494 meters; thence continuing along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, North 53° 39' 10" East, 44.550 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 1093.6 square meters (11,771 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System 01 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R IV -74-38.9-13795 (13795-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor,Act Date: H:W113fAIWPING OEE01i377i.0°C 125 *T SCALED I r 800 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1903, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002410 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. J t° SHEET 1 OF 1 4, to. ( GOOD HOPE E ACRES ADDJ D fJ DN ND, J J J IR7 Ip kik Associated Engineers, Inc. AREA 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARRI. CA 91764 PARCEL 13795'1 TEL.. (909) 900-1902 FAX4 (9091 941-0091 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST SQUARE Ti 11,171 00 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/ 40.2 SQUARE WETERSI 1,093.6 PARCH 13795-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 9, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Yoko Reed, recorded April 4, 1990, as Instrument 121892 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot, said point being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60,00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, North 36° 16' 38" West, 9.966 meters; thence South 47° 35' 02" West, 31.336 meters; thence South 48° 51' 36" West, 3.912 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said and described in a Grant Deed to Yoko Reed, said southwesterly line being the northeasterly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Lucio and Loida M. Cruz, recorded August 1, 1984, as Instrument 167184 in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 36° 16' 38" West, 6.326 meters from the most southerly corner of said land described in a Grant Deed to Yoko Reed; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line and said last mentioned northeasterly line, South 360 16' 38" East, 6.326 meters to said most southerly corner, said comer being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot, North 53° 39' 10" East, 35.055 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 284.2 square meters (3,059 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RlV-74-38.9-13797 (13797-1) This real property d-: ription has •'-en prepare + •y = e, or under my direction, in conformance with e •role "n and eyy. A Signature: Date: S rir N IMBIS'' T, L.S. 430 Expir f301a1 127 LOT 9 NE"LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO LUCIO & LOIDA M. CRUZ AS INST. N0. 167184 O.R. REC. 8-01-1984 E q_ EXIST MOUNTAIN AVENUE �A — G0E HOPE 0 OPr ACRES S ADDITION NO J I furl 11/9/ NE'!Y LINE OF LOT 9 SWIT LINE OF LANO GRANTED TO YOKO REED AS INST NO. 121892 Q.R., REC. 4-04-1990 , •, SW'LY LINE OF LOT 9 • • LOT 8 ti S'LY COR OF LAND GRANTED TO TOKO REED THE BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED AS INST. NO. 121892 O.R,. ON TIE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 19 REC. 4-04-1990 ZONE 6. MULTIPLng TANCES SHOWN BY 1.0 TO OBTAIN GROUND —LEVEL DISTANCES. LOT 10 IMP MOUNTAIN -f AVENUE Po E'LY COR OF LOT GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO.1 MB 11/87 LOT 14 LOT 13 ktiii. 131 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 94TE4 M.. 49091 9104212 F AI4 19091 241-0891 Associated Engineers, inc. AREA PARCEL No.1 1379T -I SOME FEET; 3059 PARCEL 13797-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY !VIVO nrcrP I PT I ON 01 TlvCT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 5, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom a portion thereof, as described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded March 1, 1977, as instrument 34223 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly fine of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 36° 20' 26" East, 6.096 meters to the most northerly corner of Parcel 3 as described in said Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, said corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly line, South 36° 20' 26" East, 3.139 meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 30.481 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 36° 19' 41" East, 9.006 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 36° 19' 41" West, 2.910 meters to the most southerly corner of said Parcel 3 described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Parcel 3 described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, North 53° 39' 10" East, 30.480 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 92.2 square meters (992 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.3-13809 (13809-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor BIORSKI, L.S, 4430 Date: 129 THE BEATINGS ANO OLSTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE G. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEE DISTANCES. EXHIBIT "A" • Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 5, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom a portion thereof, as described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded March 1, 1977, as Instrument 34223 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Comrnendng at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said comer being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 36° 20' 26" East, 9.235 meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 6.502 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 54° 05' 03" West, 10.000 meters; thence South 35° 54' 57" East, 2.000 meters; thence North 54° 05' 03" East, 10.000 meters; thence North 35° 54' 57" West, 2.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 20.0 square meters (215 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-39.3-13809 (13809-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Survey() Date: WSSOCiroodgmeenNWARPniCIDEMIAV-LVOC 131 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALD Ie500 v" Associated Engineers, inc. 3311 EAST SIEL5Y STREET ONTARIO, CA 91754 TEL (90919!((-1492 FAXi (9091,41-0431 01STRhCT Oa COtMTY IaVERSLIE ROUTE T4 KEOPOST 33.5/40,2 Afo r PARCEL No: SOUARE PMT: S UARE NETS 5e 13809-2 20.0 3 4421 stain tart, fa A 091 Qv THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002410 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR( = 13809-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Inq\DIata113BDJ • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 6, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 360 20' 46" East, 9.465 meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 30.480 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 36° 20' 26" East, 9.235 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 36 20' 26" West, 9.235 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 53° 39' 10" East, 30.479 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 284.9 square meters (3,067 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances, 08-RWV-74-39.3-13810 (13810-1) This real property description has been prepared by rne, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 133 Y ca ass un W —4 cJ POB 314 NTT COR OF LOT 6 • 4 LOT 7 w1Y COR OF LOT 6 v 9.1 LOT 5 SWLY LINE OF LOT 6 kik. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 41764 TEL. 19091 980-1982 FA'nn 1909) 941-0891 Associated Engineers, inc. racTOrrT rMN�ITv CflITC - WUflpf[T SOUARE FEET: 3067. 43� LOT b NE'LY LINE OF LOT 6 D0JJ HOPE ACRES AJJITJON NO, 3 M8 12/3 `c) • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUNI VEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13810--1 PARCEL HOa I38I0-I SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY I FGAI IIFSCP IPT I ON EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 6, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 36° 20' 46" East, 9.465 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly line, South 36° 20' 46" East, 2.000 meters; thence South 54^ 05' 03" West, 8.000 meters; thence North 350 54' 57" West, 2.000 meters; thence North 54° 05' 03" East, 7.985 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 16,0 square meters (172 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-39.3-13810 (13810-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signatu Date: 135 *r IrLY COR OF LOF 6 7 i c:Pc2 .Or LOT 5 `Ne r/ s c".:( 81‘40.. � 7 SIY•LY LINE OF LOT 6 itk, Associated Engineers, ktic. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91TE4 TEL -43091950 -MR FAx1490911U-0691 OISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE NILOPOST LOT 6 N`LY COR OF LOT 6 Cr) NE'LY LINE OF LOT 6 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO 3 141JS J 2/3 AREA PARCEL No.1 13810-2 SQUARE FEET; 172 [IWIAQC IiCTCOf. IC A • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. pAA 13810-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • Being a portion of Lot 7, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 36° 20' 46" East, 9.465 meters; thence North 54° 05" 03" East, 15.185 meters; thence South 81° 28' 20" East, 9180 meters; thence South 350 54' 57" East, 18.179 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 67.380 meters; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 37° 31' 32" an arc length of 44.130 meters to a point on the westerly line of Sophie Street, (20.00 feet wide) [6.096 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northerly along said westerly line and the easterly line of said Lot, North 01° 36' 35" East, 95.794 meters to the most northerly corner of said lot, said corner being the point of intersection of said southeasterly line with said westerly line, said corner also being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1755.392 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 37° 30' 32" East; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 01° 09' 42" an arc length of 35.594 meters; thence continuing along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, South 53° 39' 10" West, 30.631 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 1549.1 square rneters (16,674 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Sophie Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.3-13811 (13811-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors t. Signatur Date: lt;jgq 118'J1+%'PINGI SL1381 LOX 137 SCALE. 11800 r LOT ID LOT 5 LOT 9 LOT 6 MOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION ND. 3 M.O. 12/36 ki Associated Engineers, Inc. 331) EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91T64 TEL.1909) 980-1982 FAX, 19091941-0991 DISTRICT OS COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KILOPOST 74 33.6/10.2 AREA PARCEL No., SQUARE FEETi SQUARE'ETERS' I38a-I I6,6T4 $,549.1 SHEET 1 OF 1 II'LY LINE SOPHIE STREET E'LY LITE LOT T w 6.09601 m • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED DN THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARS 13811-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 7, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, South 36° 20' 46" East, 9.465 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said southwesterly line, South 36° 20' 46" East, 2.000 meters; thence North 54° 05' 03" East, 2.000 meters; thence North 35° 54' 57" West, 2.000 meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 2.015 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 4.0 square meters (43 square feet), The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs_ The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.3-13811 (13811-2) This real property description has been prepared b me, or under my direction, in conformance with the rofessional Land Surveyors Date: 139 M.19913E MAPPUC OEEbS;13 @ 11-d, DOC SCALEr 11800 LOT 10 LOT 5 LOT 9 X54 i \\7°4>c<% LOT 6 2DDD HOPE ACRES ADDJ 7J DN ND J 3 mJa, 12/36 Li, 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. 19091 980-1982 FAKt (9091 941-0691 Associated Engineers, inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL No 1388-2 SQUARE FEETr 43 'SQUARE METERS: 4.0 w 0 0 T� C:0 6.096 rn (209 SHEET 1 OF 1 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13811-2 a SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 11, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California,, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, North 36° 17' 26" West, 15.210 meters; thence North 54° 05' 03" East, 56.671 meters; thence North 53° 36' 50" East, 4.259 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 36° 16' 55" West, 14.786 meters from the most easterly corner of said Lot; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 36° 16' 55" East, 14.786 meters to said most easterly corner, said most easterly corner being on said northwesterly line; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot, South 53° 39' 10" West, 60.927 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 912.8 square meters (9,825 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.2-13812 (13812-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 141 O LOT 10 6 LOT 1 1 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 3 M8 12/36 SW'LY LINE OF LOT II LOT 12 4I v. if 330 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91774 T. (9091 9804992 'AX. (9Q9! 941-0491 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE IOLOPOST rru rvrrnr.r.r 1 . .a c .,lrt rates �F 43. Is r SMART' UFTFRCt all a NETT LINE OF LOT 11 E'LY COR OF LOT 1I f �f 7 i f€ V s1� f' ,`a ik , 'dc.,. 7 7 LOT 5 I OT 4 1110 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE S. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. 13812-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 11, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters) as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, North 360 17' 26" West, 15.210 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 36° 17' 26" West, 4.000 meters; thence North 54° 05' 03" East, 16.026 meters; thence South 35" 54' 57" East, 4.000 meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 16.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 64.1 square meters (690 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.2-13812 (13812-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signatur KI, L.S. 4430 Exp Date: N:Raur ut e]asx-ame NO.4430 * E_xp. Mom $7 143 GOOD HOPE ACRES AUDITION NO, 3 MEI 12/36 571 I Y LINE or LOT A PoC 5'LY COR OF LOT II Associated Engneera, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9(764 tom. 89051 !10-1962 FAX/ (9O9I 941-OOSI COUNTY r.urb c.nc ROUTE 1GL0POST 7/ w7 a ••n - NEIY LINE W LOT II PARCEL NOa 13812-2 SOUARE FEET: 690 Sf11ARF LFTrRS, 44 E'L T C0R OF LOT II THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1-00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. 13812-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 11, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288meters) as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, North 36° 17' 26" West, 15.210 meters; thence North 54° 05' 03" East, 46.671 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 54° 05' 03" East, 10.000 meters; thence North 35° 54' 57" West, 4.000 meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 10.000 meters; thence South 35° 54' 57" East, 4.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 40.0 square meters (431 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.2-13812 (13812-3) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: N IMB1OFt KI, L.S. 4430 pire?130/01 Date: Fs19ss30oPPI G10=5"x3au-a00C S .•y t/ifefogi- t; 1 c ao 145 LOT 10 LOT11 GOOD HOPE AMES ADDITION NO, 3 M8 12/36 SN'LY LIE OF LOT 4 LOT 12 kik Associated Engineers, Inc., 33p EAST S}ELOY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91754 i0.. (9O9I 9130-i9e2 FAX! (90,11941-0g91 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE ICILOPOST S3S-54'57"E 4,000m .65 1E'L T LINE OF LOT 11 crn i4GC WIC PC. n Q4 MY COR OF LOT 11 400 / / ¢14 LOT 5 LOT 4 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6, MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002410 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAFkk :3812-a7 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • • Being a portion of the North 30.00 feet [9.144 meters] of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and a portion of the West Half of the West Half of the West Half of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, as said Section is shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, and those portions of Lots 107 and 108 as shown on Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, all as described in a Grant Deed to Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church, recorded June 18, 1997, as Instrument 213294 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 107, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], formerly known as County Highway as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 107, South 42° 40' 52" East, 11.237 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 25.979 meters; thence South 52° 58' 15" West, 30.955 meters to a point on the easterly fine of Sophie Street, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], formerly known as Frederick Street as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, said easterly line also being the westerly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church; thence northerly along said easterly and westerly line, North 01° 36' 35" East, 14.250 /meters to a point of intersection with said southeasterly line, said southeasterly line being the northwesterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church, said point of intersection being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1755.377 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 38° 24' 33" East; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 010 31' 52" an arc length of 46.908 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 593.5 square meters (6,388 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Sophie Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances.. 08-RIV-74-39.4-13816 (13816-1) This real property description -.s been pr— .re' by me, or under my direction, in conformance wit Proms.'. al La Lr ,.rev., s Act. Signature: c; ohn I m bi+ rski, L.S. 4430 es 9/30/01 Date: N:1491387MAKIMGi 5113!16.000 SHEET 1 OF 1 r SCALD 1111000 w'LY 3O TO COUNTY OF RNER510E PER BK.1927/R49 OA. REC.6-14-56 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1903. ZONE 6. MULTPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO 0BTAI1 GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91164 TEL, (9091 9B0-1982 FAxt (9091 941-0891 DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 11 KILOPOST 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL 110.8 13816-1 SOUARE FEETo 6.388 SQUARE "ETFRS, 593.5 PARCH 13816-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "�l' °' Fee Being a portion of Lot 103, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.285 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 41' 14" East, 11.388 meters; thence South 490 12' 32" West, 15.213 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 41' 21" East, 11.152 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 41° 21" West, 11.152 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line, said most westerly comer also being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1755.377 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 41° 25° 46" East; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lot and along said curve through a central angle of 00° 29' 47" an arc length of 15.208 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 171.2 square meters (1,843 square feet). TOGETHER with tee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.5-13820 (13820-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional l,and Surveyors 149 SCALE' IH1000 120 1209 STREET (FREDERICK W T 11) 9.144 m 1301 ` \ \ 6 \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 5 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ • 4 \\ \\0.` .• 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ IN \ 3 \ \ :L...- \ \ \ d \ \ I'M \ \ yry: 1., 2 \\ \\ Fy \\ \ Qo� 0 SHEET 1 OF 1 R J 111EZ TRACT 9 s LID A Ic a4 16/9 Ap` \ a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1013 Ilk 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9)764 TEL. (9091940-1982 FAX' 14091911-0691 Associated Engineers, Inc. \ \ 4 106 \ 101 AREA 104 105 f 103 102 101 10 99 R 1 NE HART ' s 8L V,C . TRACT 16/9 PARCEL P10.. 13820-1 SQUARE FEET' 1843 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE ktOROST D8 RIVEASIDE T4 33.6/40.2 SOUSE ) TEi1Si 111.2 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY OISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002410 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13820-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • Date: EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 102, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [1.8.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 41' 03" East, 11.755 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 15.215 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 41' 14" East, 11.388 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 41' 14" West, 11,388 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line, said most westerly comer also being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1755.377 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 41° 55' 33" East; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lot and along said curve through a central angle of 00° 29' 47" an arc length of 15.208 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 175.8 square meters (1,892 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6, Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.5-13821 (13821-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional and Surveyors • ct. �J • T F I, " .S. 4430 Ex s 9/30/0 nv c4+man+ a esc9ii cweaas»a 151 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE' IeI000 (20'1 9J44 m • 130'1 \ • R J N4ART ' S R S VD J TRACT CT 9 \\ 1' aa, 16/9 \ \\ 2 \ ♦\ • \ \ \ \ \ 7 \ N \• \• \ \ •• \ \ \ \ \ •\ \ \ 5 \ \ \ \ \• \ • \ \ \ •4 •\ \ I \ \ • \ \• \ 3 \ \ • \ \ \ 2 \\ \• \ *b \ \ \ 1 \\ \ \ t • \ \ \ lob \ Joe Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9176.4 TEL. (9091980-1962 FAX, 1909) 941-0891 DISTRICT G0(l11TY ROUTE ALMOST O8 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 \ \ AREA 104 105 103 102 10 100 99 R J NEHART' S BLVD. TRACT .0, 16/9 PARCEL N0a 13621-1 SOUK FEET' 1.892 SQUARE AFTERS! 175.8 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR .. 13821-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "At' Fee Being a portion of Lot 101, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 39' 44" East, 12.189 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 15,241 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 41' 03" East, 11.755 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 41' 03" West, 11.755 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.238 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 182.4 square meters (1,963 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). • • The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-39.5-13822 (13822-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: Date. M:1991�i 1,11922-0CC 1, L.S. 4430 153 SCALE: 1:1040 1 ij4 \ \ \y ��„ R 1 NF Ar' T` S BL VD s TRAM' �\ \ M.8., 16/ rw \ \ a \ \ \ .0 \ \ \ w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w I \\\ \\ \\ 6 \\ •\ \ i W + \ \ \ 1c \ \ \ to I \ \\ 5 \\ \ \• \ \ r w \ \\ 4 \\ \\ d . \\ \\ \ \ (.41 3a' \\ \\ • •\ L4 f Ea ( \ \ \ \ \ \ N. � N. \ -4 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91T64 TEL. ISD91980-1982 F A& I909I 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 R1NBHAF T'S BLVDJ TRACT MP 16/9 PARCEL NO.I 13822-1 WARE FEET' 1.963 SQUARE METERS: 182.4 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CAUFORN1A COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 600002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL INSTANCES. PAR06d. 13822-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • Fee Being a portion of Lot 99, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 99, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 37' 05" East, 13.056 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 15.240 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 38' 24" East, 12.623 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 38' 24" West, 12.623 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.238 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 195.6 square meters (2,105 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.5-13824 (13824-1) This real prope,ty description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conforrnance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. N:199116WP'PVI WEED9,3767-WC 155 MOST N'LY C0R LOT 99 Associated Engineers, Inc. OISTIRICT COUITY ROUTE KLOPOST Oe RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 \ • \ 96 \ \ \ • • SCALEs I i 500 • • 1 � i 619 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARC& 13824-1 SKETC, TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 91, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 31' 51" East, 16.527 meters; thence South 490 12' 32" West, 15.244 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant thereon, South 42° 31' 56" East, 16.094 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 31' 56" West, 16.094 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.238 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 248.5 square meters (2,675 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.7}13833 (13833-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. l.H,vb Signature; es mbiors i, . . 4430 Expire • *130101 Date: HA9917SO4APFINGjC E'DS1133330eX NO. 4410 09/30/01 157 Y SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALER 11800 4.1 \ \ \ \ • • \ THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91T64 TEL. OM 980-1982 FAX, 19097 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSIDE T1 KILOPOST 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL No. 13833-1 SOUARE FEETR 2.675 SCOPE NETERSR 248.5 PAFAtt 13833-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 91, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 31' 51" East, 16.527 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly line, South 42° 31' 51" East, 6.003 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 7.182 meters; thence North 40° 47' 28" West, 6.000 meters; thence North 49° 12' 32" East, 7.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 42.6 square meters (459 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R IV -74-39.7-13833 (13833-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in confon-nance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act Date: ,4:,49, 1 1 3-z DOC 159 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE' 11800 ! ! kik 33i1 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9t1&1 TEL. 19091980-1982 EAX1 (9091 94I-0891 Associated Engineers, Inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE T4 33.6/40.2 AREA PARCEL Noj 13833-2 SOIIARE FEET1 459 SOUARE METERSs 42.6 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13833-2 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 10 through 14 inclusive, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fined in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in Parcel A, Grant Deed to Manh Van Luong, et. ux,, recorded July 13, 1998, as Instrument 287147, of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 10, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lots, North 47° 34' 40" East, 61.555 meters to the most easterly corner of said land described in a Grant Deed to Manh Van Luong, et. ux., said easterly corner being the most southerly corner of land described in an Interspousal Transfer Grant Deed to Larry Payne, recorded August 25, 1998, as Instrument 356399 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Manh Van Luong, et. ux. and the southwesterly line of said land described in an Interspousal Transfer Grant Deed to Larry Payne, North 42° 38' 18" West, 14.957 meters; thence South 47° 08' 09" West, 61.564 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 10, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 42° 40' 20" West, 14.483 meters from said most southerly corner of Lot 10; thence southeasterly along said last mentioned southwesterly line, South 42° 40' 20" East, 14.483 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 906.2 square meters (9,753 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.6-13834 (13834-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: 1 Date: SHEET I OF r 6.9 .. f \f / 143) r r ' j' \ \ ", \''. , > \ SW'LY LINE H ., 1 '\oF LOT la \ fi a, \ \ afi'4+F Cis\ N N'• l" \ `, r,.% (690 • , , pot 0 . ( * 0 -1 N. ,F • , . ,\ •*\ ,, O lb + ��5 L • • , , 4 `♦ . G\ \ • \ Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA SITG4 TE .19O91 960-1952 FA14 t9O9194 -099[ A"\ OISTRICT COUNT ROUTE KLOPOST x.47.4117 , 0 AFlEA PARCEL HIM 13834-1 SQUARE FEETs 9,753 S/MIIiP urTray, WIG.? SCALE= I; 800 khan. 13834-1 • • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0000247' TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • • Fee Being those portions of Lots 16 and 17, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 17, said comer being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 17, North 42° 36' 17" West, 13.971 meters; thence South 49° 51' 50" West, 30.505 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 16, said point being distant thereon, North 42° 37' 18" West, 15.188 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot 16; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 42° 37' 18" East, 15.188 meters to said most southerly corner, said most southerly comer being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lots, North 47° 34' 40" East, 30.473 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 444.3 square meters (4,782 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RiV-74-39.7-13839 (13839-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors t. Signature: Date: 010 L . 4430 Fxpir "9130/0 64-‘4913104APPING,,DEEOS113819.COC 163 SHEET 1 OF 1 • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • •• •• • • • • t • • \1 • • 3 4 • • • • • • kk Associated Engineers, Inc. 33R EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL, t9081 980-1982 FAX: 19091 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSIDE 74 IOLOP0ST 33.6/40.2 N • \• o �• ti z• •• • • `\ `\ e, • • • AREA PARCEL FAA 13839-1 S0UARE F11ET1 4,782 SQUARE *TER51 444.3 SCALD 11800 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13839-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 84 and 85, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows= BEGINNING at the most northerly comer of said Lot 84, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 84, South 42° 31' 17" East, 14.499 meters; thence South 45° 48' 18" West, 30.487 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 85, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 31' 27" East, 15.443 meters from the most westerly corner of said Lot 85; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 31' 27" West, 15.443 meters to said most westerly comer, said most westerly corner being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lots, North 47° 34' 40" East, 30.475 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 456.2 square meters (4,910 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to Ole above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74), The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.8-13845 (13845-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: 1 Date: vossoo.choNs9 imoopptsulocuyskili45 floc 165 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE: 11500 q Illk Associated Englneers. Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. i90919eo-$9B2 FAX.19091 941-089i DISTRICT OR COUNTY RIVERSK C ROUTE ALOPOST 14 33.6/40.2 K \ } 0 to T <4\ THE BEARING'S AND OISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL No.: 13845-1 SOUARE FEET: 4.910 SOUK METERS: 4562 Paqpg. 1aaa5-1 411 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • • Being a portion of Lot 83, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters; as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 31' 12" East, 14.028 meters; thence South 45° 48' 18" West, 15.244 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 31' 17" East, 14.499 meters from the most westerly comer of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly Tine, North 42° 31' 17" West, 14.499 meters to said most westerly comer, said most westerly comer being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.238 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 217.3 square meters (2,339 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.8-13846 (13846-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Profession Land Surve Date: 167 SHEET 1 OF 1 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY °(STANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. li Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET OIRTAR10. CA 91764 TEL. (9091990-1952 FA74 (909191-0691 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST OA RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL L No.l 13646-1 S01JARE FETs 2.339 SQUARE IIETI ASI 217.3 PaaW 13848-1 • SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" • • Fee Being those portions of Lots 24 and 25, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 25, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 25, North 42° 32' 13" West, 13.219 meters; thence South 48° 23' 22" West, 10.370 meters; thence South 45° 43' 59" West, 20.117 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 24, said point being distant thereon, North 42° 33' 14" West, 12.718 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot 24; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 42° 33' 14" East, 12.718 meters to said most southerly corner, said most southerly corner being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lots, North 47° 34' 40" East, 30.473 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 400.0 square meters (4,306 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39,8-13849 (13849-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 169 LOT 25 \ I* LY LINE OF LOT 2S �r-� R1NEli-LA T°S ouI F- YARD . AC 1 NI , I .6/=) LOT 24 SW'LY LINE OF LOT 24 LOT 23 • AF S'LY COR OF LOT 24 litik 33N EAST slimy STREET 0.flARIO, CA 91164 TEL. (9091 980-1902 FAXf I909I 94I-0091 Associated Engineers. inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 1ft.OPOST OS RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/402 c4 4 1 LOT 26 AREA PALL No.: 13649-1 SOUAflE FEET: 4306 SOUARE METERS: 400.0 t J� THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00002470 TD OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PA CEL 13849-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 32, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fled in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) 08.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly fine of said Lot, North 42° 29' 34" West, 7.984 meters; thence South 55° 02' 15" West, 15.375 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant thereon, North 42° 29' 56" West, 9.980 meters from the most southerly comer of said Lott thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 42° 29' 56" East, 9.980 meters to said most southerly comer, said most southerly comer being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15241 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 136.9 square meters (1,474 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.9-13855 (13855-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act • 171 SHEET 1 OF 1 • 16, R 1 NEHAf T ' S BOULEVARD T ACI mAgJ 16/9 Associated Vie, Inc. 330 EAST REM SWEET Of#TARiOs CA I Ts4 TEL (902)900.0202 n.x 11041141.0111 PMGEL Ilo.i 13655-t OISTIOCT COMFY ROUTE SLOPOST SUM FEU I4T4 LOT 34 THE REARMS AND OISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 19$3, ZOKE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 4000024TO TO OBTAIN CR ' + O'ISTAHCFS, PARCEL 13855-1 41° — SKETCH T91 A , r ANY LEGAL DESC 4 ` : tON EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • That portion of Lot 41 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract in the County of Riverside, State of California as shown on Map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the East corner of said Lot, said corner being a point on a non -tangent curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 300.316 meters, a radial line to said point bears North 28°24'20" West; thence North 32°41'45" West, 1.601 meters along the Northeasterly line of said Lot; thence South 52°48'28" West, 12.018 meters to the Southeasterly line of said Lot and said non -tangent curve, a radial line bears North 30°41'44" West; thence Northeasterly 12.002 meters along said Southeasterly line and non -tangent curve through a central angle of 2°17'24" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74-25.0-13863 (13863-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date 61?~ (—J t L CEHSEO LARD SURVEYOR DAYE APPROVED EXIST. R/W RB= N30* 41'44"W TO ELSINORE r . `f \JAI SECTION 1 5.52° 4$'28"W 12.018m - N32' 41'45"W 1.601m PERRIS RB= x'28 °242014/ EX:sr. R/W STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DES iRIPTION SCALE I:200 • EXHIBIT „A" Fee • That portion of Lot 63 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on Map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the West corner of said Lot, said corner being on a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly having a radius of 882.300 meters, a radial line to said corner bears South 28°28'24" East, said non -tangent curve also being the Northwesterly line of said Lot; thence Northeasterly 15.275 meters along said curve through a central angle of 00°59'31 to the North corner of said Lot, a radial line to said corner bears South 29°27'55" East; thence South 32°40'01" East 21.022 meters along the Northeasterly line of said Lot; thence South 55°02'37" West 12.507 meters; thence South 10°©2'36" West 4.040 meters to the Southwesterly line of said Lot; thence North 32°40'42" West 25.475 meters along said line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74-25.0-13866 (13866-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. e Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date -3 (' T)HOYAs J. Q*1I1 H Exp 09-L0-04 No. __ 6s3] LICENSED LAND MIRY YON "rJ" a DATE APPROVED if J� To ELSINQRE .,.0.J1, SECTION I EXIST. R/w EXIST. RTE. 74 RB- S28° 28"24",5 EXIST. R%W LOT 65 P.Q.B. E Ckr c‘f a LL -1 V LOT 64 M.B. 1 /9 TO PERRIS R=882.300m LS-QQ *59131" L=15.274m 13866-1 555 ° 02'37"W 12.501m LOT 63 R8= 529 ` 27`55"E LOT 62 LOT 61 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1:400 EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement That portion of Lot 63 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on. Map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of County recorder of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING on the West corner of said Lot; thence South 32°40'42" East 25.475 meters along the Southwesterly line of said lot to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 32°40'42" East 2.000 meters along said line; thence North 57°19'19" East 15.237 meters to the Northeasterly line of said Lot; thence North 32°40'01" West 5.465 meters along said line; thence South 55°02'37" West 12.507 meters; thence South 10°02'36" West 4.040 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate system of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. 08-Riv-74-25.0-13866 (13866-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date le -- (--4V TINOws J. MARIAN LICENSED LAND SURVEvOR DATE APPROVED EXIST. R E T Lil or" o Lc; Tel c\, N 1/1 S32° 40'42"E 2.000m 13866-2 S1O ° 02'36"W 4.040m N32 ° 40'01"W 5.165m .z N51 °19'19"E 15.237m TO PERRIS STATE OF CALIFORNIA USINE SS. TRANSPORTATION ANO HOUSING AGENCY OEPARTAAENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE I:400 • EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • That portion of Lot 43 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on Map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as -follows: BEGINNING at the South corner of said Lot, said corner being on a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly having. a radius of 864.012 meters, a radial line to said corner bears South 28°23'07" East, said non -tangent curve also being the Southeasterly line of said Lot; thence North 32°42'48" West 8.554 meters along the Southwesterly line of said Lot; thence North 14°57'11" East 2.066 meters; thence North 59°57'10" East 8.000 meters; - - thence South 75°02'53" East 8.486 meters to the Northeasterly line of said Lot; -- . thence South 32°42'17" East 4.318 meters along said line to the East corner of said Lot, said corner being on said non - tangent curve, a radial line to said corner bears South 29°23'52" East; thence Southwesterly 15.268 meters along said curve through a central angle of 01°0(7'45" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-R.iv-74-25.0-13867 (13867-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date "6. 31— :7 LAkp '4,51 SGT -.." fu04as .1_ DATUM Exp. 09.79^oa NO 6A3] or C LS{ENSED LAND SIIRVEYCR ©ATE APPROVED M.B. 16/9 LOT 42 N14* 57'11"E 2.066m N32 ° 42'48"W 8.554m EXIST, R/W P.Q.B. _ T. EXIST. RTE. 74 TQ ELJINI, RE l , 'f Ji SECTION 1 LOT 43 N59 ° 57`10"E 8.000m L=15.268m x-01"00'45" R -864.012m o"ST. IL POST KC 08 RJV. 74 25.0 LOT 44 13867-- 575 0 02'53"E 8.486n LOT 45 om S32042'17' E --4.318m RB 529 '23'52"E RBA 528 *23'07"E EXIST. R/W TO PERMS" STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIDN SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DE1WR1PTI0N • SCALE 1:400 • EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • That portion of Lot 44 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on Map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the West corner of said Lot, said corner being on a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly having a radius of 864.012 meters, a radial line to said corner bears South 29°23'52" East, said non -tangent curve also being the Southeasterly line of said Lot; thence North 32°42'17" West 4.318 meters along the Southwesterly line of said Lot; thence North 59°57'08" East 15.236 meters to the Northeasterly line of said Lot; thence South 32°40'57" East 4.357 meters along said line to the East corner of said Lot, said corner being on said non - tangent curve, a radial line to said corner bears South 30°24'29" East; thence Southwesterly 15.235 meters along said curve through a central angle of 10°00'37" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74-25.0-13868 (13868-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Date �3!'c� Professional Land Surveyor UCENSEO LAND SURVEYOR -3r-vr DATE APPROVED ,� J LOT 42 LOT 43 N32" 42'17"W 4.318m SECTION I LOT 44 N59" 57'08"E 15.236m alas 11 1 LOT 45 S32 40'57"E 4.357m LOT 46 A=01° 00'37" EXIST, R/W _ _ RB_ S29 '23152"E R=864.012m RB= S30' 24'29"E TO ELSINORE - EXIST. R/W TO PERRIS STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DES IPTION SCALE 1:400 • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement That portion of Lot 44 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on Map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING at the East corner of said Lot; thence North 32°40'57" West 4.357 meters along the Northeasterly line of said Lot to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 59°57'08" West 2.230 meters; thence North 30°02'52" West 5.000 meters; thence North 59°57'08" East 2.000 meters to the Northeasterly line of said Lot; thence South 32°40'57" East 5.005 meters along said line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. The rights acquired herein terminate upon completion of construction. 08-Riv-71-25.0-13868 (13868-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date -or LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR DATE APPROVED J J S LOT 42 ---5r .-p LOT 43 iQ ELS/NQRE SECTION I LOT 44 N30° 02'52"VW 5.000m P.O.B. EXIST. R/W LOT 46 LOT 45 N59 ° 57'08"E 2.000m 40'57"E 5.005m ,N3.2 ° 40"57"W 4.357m X15 1 • R/W ♦--- P.O.C. IMP. RTE. 74 TO PERRI.S STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUS NESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESORPTION SCALE 1:400 • EXHIBIT "A" Fee That portion of Lot 56 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the North corner of said lot; said corner being on a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 882.300 meters, a radial line to said corner bears South 36°23'58" East, said non -tangent curve also being the Northwesterly line of said lot; thence South 32°34'43" East 30.861 meters along the Northeasterly line of said lot; thence South 48°21'09" West 3.866 meters; thence North 86'38'50" West 14.089 meters to the Southwesterly line of said lot; thence North 32°34'54" West 22.318 meters along said line to the West corner of said lot, said corner being on said non -tangent curve, a radial line to said corner bears South 35°24'32" East; thence Northeasterly 15.254 meters along said curve through a central angle of 00°59'26" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv--74-25.1--13876 (13876-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date 7-421—'9/ • DATE APPROVED TO ELSINORE EXIST. R/W LOT 58 EXIST. R/W EXIST. RTE. 74 N86* 38'50"01 14.089m -- LOT 57 R-882.3OOm d=QO 59'26" L IS.254m LOT 56 M.B. 16/9 w E LOco 0 Ta PERRIS RB- S36* 23'58"E P.O.B. 3.866m 548 24'©9"W STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTAT+ON AN0 ROUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL EKES .°IPTION • SCALE I: 400 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement That portion of Lot 56 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: COMMENCING at the West corner of said lot; thence South 32°34'54" East 22.318 meters along the Southwesterly line of said lot to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 32°34'54" East 25.747 meters along said line; thence North 59°48'07" East 3.994 meters; thence North 32°34'54 West 23.021 meters; thence North 86°38'50" West 4.928 meters to the PAINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. 08-Riv-74-25.1-13876 (13876-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Dale -v3-0/ T IOULi J. DATUM E xp. 07.30-0A Na ISen LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OATS APPROVED J r Li S l a f 1' \j\J Li , iv] SECTION I EXIST. R/0/ TCl FERRIS EXIST. R/W LOT 56 M.B. 16/9 N86 ° 38'50 W '1. 28m rE Lf r - LOT 57 �'l�; 7/.)- r\i N59° 48'07"E 3.994m rn N C`J LOT 55 LOT 54 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DES'IPTION SCALE 1:400 • • • EXHIBIT "A„ Fee That portion of the North 82.1 feet (25.024 meters) of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 1, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying Westerly of the State Highway being 60.00 feet (18.288 meters) wide per Deed to the County of Riverside recorded on January 23, 1915 in Book 406, Page 75 of Deeds in the office of the County Recorder of said county, lying Easterly of the following described line: COMMENCING at the North quarter corner of said Section 1; thence North 89°31'15" West 248.156 meters along the North line of said Section 1 to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said line also being the centerline of Ellis Avenue as shown on Rinehart's Boulevard Tract filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county; thence South 00°28'45" West 9.144 meters to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 90.860 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears North 00°28'45" East; thence Easterly 54.382 meters along said curve through a central angle of 34°17'34" to the South line of said North 82.1 feet (25.024 meters), a radial line to said point bears North 34°46'19" East. Together with underlying fee interest if any, contiguous to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way "Ellis Avenue". Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74-25.1-13878 (13078-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. ----?" Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date 4? -03 ,c7 D LARD SURVErOIR 9--�3 -al 1!L P.D.C. GSr, CQIRIYP MITE POST WE 08 RWY. N COR. SEC.I 74 SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 82.I FEET SECTION I, T5S, R4W RB-N34 ° 46'19"E STATE of CAL.SrORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESeRIPTION SCALE 1:500 25.1e R.D. 4 5/75 • EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • Those portions of Lots 53 and 54 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by the map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of ,said County; described as follows: BEGINNING at the westerly corner of said Lot 54; thence North 53°00'24" East 29.509 meters along the Northwesterly line of said Lots 53 and 54 to the beginning of a tangezn curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 882.300 meters; thence Northeasterly 1.168 meters along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 53 and said curve through a central angle of 00°04'33" to the North corner of said Lot 63; thence along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 53 South 32°30'01" East, 14.661 meters; thence leaving said Northeasterly line South 43°44'09" West, 31.454 meters to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 54; thence along said Southwesterly line of said Lot 54 North 32°35'08" West, 19.740 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings used in the above description are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances shown are grid distances. Multiply all distances shown by 1.00009320 to obtain ground level distances. 08-Riv-74-25.I-13879 (13879-1) This real pro rty description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land „Sur yors cL S igrat Date Prof J MICHAEL W. LOFY Exp.9-20-2004 (4o. 5471 EXIST. RTE. 74 TO ELSINORE LOT 55 Signet Date 01/21/DS f, 5 S, R, 4 �i L SECTION 1 LOT 54 STATE OF CAL}FORNIA BUSINESS,TRARSPORTATIOR AND ROUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION n- r1 I Ja1�a EXIST. R/W RB-S37 ° 04`09"E LOT 53 GIST. cOUNTr ROUFE POST II2LE 08 RIV. 74 25.1 R=882.300 A =00 ° 04'33" L=1.168m (3.832') LOT 52 SKETCH Q, ACCOMPAN A LEGAL [S�ESCRIPT I SCALE 1;400 • • EXHIBIT "A" Temporary Construction Easement That portion of Lots 52,53,54,and 55 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract in the County of Riverside, State of California as shown by the map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: COMMENCING at the North corner of said Lot 52; thence South 32°32'57" East 13.603 meters along Northeasterly line of said Lot 52; thence South 48°30'18" West 15.342 meters; thence South 43°44'09" West 15.723 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 43°44'09" West 15.731 meters; thence South 32°35'08" East 23.411 meters; thence North 50°49'28" East 15.365 meters; thence North 32°32'18" West 25.368 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. 08-Riv-74-25.1- 13879 (13879-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Date Professional Land Surveyor aS J. ON Ems,9%`- LS 6833 LAND TIMAS ,L flATIW1 Eap A9-3,3-04 No. €031 OF CAk��f LICENSEE! LAND SURVEYOR CIL— 421 OATE APPNOVEO EXIST. R/W TO ELSINORE LOT 55 SECTION EXIST. H 1 t. EXIST. R/W LOT 53 LOT 51 a! 5a3° �`A a9rnw__ Sa3° ,�qiO 1 \5.1 3 15 .� 31m ; 13879-2 ._• N50° 49'28"E 15.385m P.J.B. E C`1 rr) rY7 a IA z Y cos! 1w -E as RJV. 74 25.1 f--) �ID.J�'J� -s TO PEF?RIS LOT 52 B° 3©'18' • 5.342m P.Q.G. R/W STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1 400 EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • • That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 12427, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on the map recorded in Book 77, Page 53 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING on the Southwest corner of said parcel, said corner being on a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 190.101 meters, a radial line to said corner bears South 48°13'21" East; thence Northeasterly 12.888 meters along said non -tangent curve through a central angle of 3°53'03"; thence North 37°53'36" East 16.411 meters along the Westerly line of said parcel to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 597.434 meters; thence Northeasterly 10.972 meters along said non -tangent curve through a central angle of 1°03'08" to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 57°51'04" East 11.036 meters to the beginning of a non - tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 608.434 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears South 53°14'38" East; thence Northeasterly 64.649 meters along said non -tangent curve through a central angle of 6°05'17"; thence North 59°42'15" West 11.000 meters to the Westerly line of said parcel and the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 597.434 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears South 59°19'30" East; thence Southwesterly 64.295 meters along said non -tangent curve through a central angle of 6°09'58" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Together with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009320 to obtain ground level distances 08-Riv74-25.5 13889 (13889-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, inconformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date 7 - 29-- v2 -r ff J TO ELS!NORrE R.190.101m d e03. 53' 03" L=12.B88 ; 7 SATE APPROVED SECTION 36 156 RB-559' 19' 30"E R8=553. 09' 32"E pOB R=808.4 34 6,49mp=g' 05' 17 R,N RS -553' 14' 36'E COT. COUNTY POLITE POST Ulf 00 RMV. N59� 42,,',101,15"11 51 PARCEL PARCEL MAP NO.12427 -57 P.M.B. 77/53 74 25.5 -AD STATE OF GALIFQRNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1:1000 • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, according to the Official Plat thereof, in the County of Riverside, State of California, of the land conveyed by Decree of Distribution to Ethel May Hatcher recorded on October 20, 1978 as Instrument No. 221867 in Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said county, lying Easterly of the following described line: BEGINNING at a point on the North line of said Southeast quarter distant North 89°35'37" West 118.060 meters from the East quarter corner of said Section 36, said corner marked by a 1 &I inch Iron Pipe; thence South 29'°45'05" West 155.275 meters; thence South 27°56'26" West 73.901 meters to the Northerly line of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 19127 as shown by the map filed in Book 125, Pages 52 and 53 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, said point also being North 89°34'27" West 9.010 meters from the Northeast corner of said Parcel 3. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74-25.6-13896 (13896-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date '—�G -'/ LAIC Sta,l•eki tuft ANYloyEll f , 4 S f' ff VII a n r1 �, 11 J P.O.9. INSTRUMENT NO. 221867, OCTOBER 20, 1978 PARCEL 3 F.M. NO, 1 J 1 ?7 P.M.B. 125/52-53 aa% M„.50 5b.6ZS 3 t!I 1 9.01P0m NB5° 34'27.. ,m1 ,at RM. 74 25.6 E + COR. SEC. 36 FND. I NO TAG SECTION 36 0 -12 0 33 NE CORNER PARCEL 3 STATE OF CAI.AFOR,4,A BUSINESS. TRAN57'DR TAT,DN ANQ '<USING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF 7RANSPPDRTATIAN SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTIO1N SCALE 1:1000 • • • • • • Exhibit "A" Fee That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, according to the Official Plat thereof, in the County of Riverside, State of California, of the land conveyed in a Judgement of Final Distribution (Case No. 28772) to Ianthe Williams Roberson Et Al recorded on September 20, 1971 as Instrument No. 106393 in Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of said land, said Southwest corner being the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 282.053 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears North 68°46'56" West; thence Northerly 49.435 meters along said curve through a central angle of 10°02'32"; thence North 31°15'35" East, 23.424 meters along the Westerly line of said land to the Northwest corner of said land; thence South 89°18'19" East, 14.167 meters along the Northerly line of said land; thence South 26°37'18" West, 34.345 meters; thence South 41°42'22" West, 8.739 meters; thence South 15°04'00" West, 11.354 meters; thence South 26°37'18" West, 17.968 meters to the Southerly line of said land; thence North 89°34'27" West, 15.943 meters along said Southerly line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings used in the above description are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances shown are grid distances. Multiply all distances shown by 1.00010238 to obtain ground level distances. 084Riv-74-25.6-13897 (13897-1) This re -al property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surve ors . -t Signal Professional Lard Sury Date 6?09I03 MICHAEL W. LOFY Nome 5471 Number 9-30.2004 Exp. Date r�CFCAL EXIST. RTE. 74 R -282.053m Lr-49-435m -- AA1010232" N89' 34.27"Yi --15.943m :526. 37'18"18 Professional Lund eyor SECTION 36 515- p4'00" r; -.- 8,739 11.354 INSTRUMENT NO. 106393. SEPTEMBER 20.1971 EXIST. R/Yi TO PERRIS STATE OF EXIST. R/w CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1:500 203T EXHIBIT "A" Fee • That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, according to the Official Plat thereof, in the County of Riverside, State of California, of the land described in a Deed to Thomas H. Hall Et 3x recorded on January 30, 1981 as Instrument No. 17507 in Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said county, lying Easterly of the following described line: BEGINNING at a point on the North line of said Southeast quarter distant North 89°35'37" West 118.060 meters from the East quarter corner of said Section 36, said corner being marked by a 1 ' inch Iron Pipe; thence South 29645'05" West 155.275 meters; thence South 27°56'26" West 73.901 meters to the Northerly line of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 19127 as shown by map filed in Book 125, Pages 52 and 53 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, said point being North 89°34'27" West 9.010 meters from the Northeast corner of said parcel. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08--Riv-74-25.7. 13898 (13898-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date ? ' 7 --v fl J ERR SURVEYOR DOE am991.99 „ ] 3 r-1 r 1 P.O.$. INSTRUMENT NO. 17507. JANUARY 30.1981 PARCEL 3 M NCL 19121 P.M.U.I 5/52-53 RIY. 71 1 P 14E ?5.7 E I COR. SEC. 36 V` SECTION 36 OR OR w 0 0 3 9.010m NESS' 34'21"W 09 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS.. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENC, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCR ION SCALE 1:1000 • • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee That portion of the North half of the North half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 4 South, Range 4 West, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, according to the Official Plat thereof, in the County of Riverside, State of California, of the land described in Deed to Leopoldina Molina recorded on May 1, 1995 as Instrument No. 136031 in Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of said land, said corner being on the Northwesterly line of State Highway Route 74, formerly a county road being 60.00 feet (18.288 meters) wide as described in a Deed to said county recorded on August 5, 1915 in Book 406, Page 325 of Deeds in the office of the County Recorder of said county; thence North 89°35'02" West 14.826 meters along the Southerly line of said land; thence North 29°45'05" East 48.028 meters to the Northerly line of said land; thence South 89°35'26" East 16.300 meters along said line to the Northeast corner of said land, said corner being on the Northwesterly line of said Highway; thence South 31°15'35" West 48.769 meters along said Northwesterly line of said Highway to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74-25.7--13901 (13901_1) - This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date 9 -g7 -v LAND fG4 n,uuAS t. OADMAI EYp M' O,o! No. cnv OF CAL LICENSED LANG SURVEYOR 9-07-p) OAYE APPROVED �1 J J J \J1\J J SECT I CAN 36 INSTRUMENT NO. 136031 MAY 1, 1995 N29 45'05"E 48.028m ST. COINT Jtr Corr rduE 06 Env. 74 25.7 rl S R/W "v' L as %-9Q �39Ot l GIs P.O.B. TO ELSINORE EXIST. R/W S31* 15'35"W 48.769m ----- R.D. 406/325 EXIST. R/W EXIST. RTE. 74 TO PERRIS STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH Tp ACCOMPANY A LEGAL' DES RIPTION • SCALE 1:400 EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • That portion of Lot 45 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows. BEGINNING at the South corner of said lot, said corner being on a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 864.012 meters, a radial line to said corner bears South 30°24'29" East; thence North 32°40'57" West 4.357 meters along the Southwesterly line of said lot; thence North 59°57'08" East 15.252 meters to the Northeasterly line of said lot; thence South 32°40'01" East 4.126 meters along said line to the East corner of said lot and the beginning of said non -tangent curve, a radial line to said corner bears South 31°25'08" East; thence Southwesterly 15.243 meters along said non -tangent curve through a central angle of 01°00'39" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08- iv -74-25.0-13906 (13906-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date ?— 0 7- a/ 4040. LS 6833 AND 04, MOW*S J. OX MAX Np. 6a7! LICE 0 LANG SURVEYOR DATE APPROVED 0 CAL LOT 42 r' r -ti \, LOT 43 R/W EXIST. R/W SECTION I 13906-1 LOT 44 N32 ° 40'57"W 4.357m P.Q.B. wsi. cgwr+ ROWE POST ma -t Oa RIV. 74 25.0 r r7 ')J1 LOT 45 N59 ° 57'08"4 I5.252m R8= S30° 24'29"E R=864.012m �' SEXIST. RTE. 74 d=o1 ° 00'39„ L. =15. _- --_ -_. 243m TQ ELS1N'QR� EXIST. R/W RB= S31° 25`08"E LOT 4E S32 ° 40'01" .-.F 4.126m TO PERRIS • STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESSpIPTI0N SCALE 4:400 • • • EXHIBIT "A" TemporaryConstruction Easement That portion of Lot 45 of Rinehart's Boulevard Tract in the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: COMMENCING at the South corner of said lot; thence North 32°40'57" West 4.357 meters along the Southwesterly line of said lot to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 32°40'57" West 5.005 meters along said line; thence North 59°57'OS" East 6.000 meters; thence South 30°02'52" East 5.000 meters; thence South 59°57'08" West 5.770 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction. 08-Riv-74-25.0-13906 (13906-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Professional Land Surveyor Date 9— F%7 -c r‘ ri iVi LOT 42 LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR 9- 07-0/ DATE APPROVED J \ J J 2 J J LOT 43 R/W EXIST, R/W SECTION I LOT 44 N32° 40'57"W 5.005m . N32* 40'57°"W 4.357m -._-- q.4 EXIST RTE. 74 T(] E�.SfN'l]RE EXIST. R/W • A LOT 45 N59° 57'08"E --: 6.000m a P.O.B. LOT 46 S30° 02'52"E 5.000m S59 ° 57'0$"W :—: 5.770m TO PERRIS STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DES,`1PTION SCALE I: 400 • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee That portion of Block "V" of Perris Heights Estates in the City of Perris, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by the map on file in. Book 14, Pages 72,73,and 74 in the office of the County Recorder of said county, lying Southerly and Easterly of the land described in a Deed to the State of California recorded an March 15, 1954 in Book 1564, Page 542 of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest terminus of that certain course described in said Deed as "North 60°40'00" East, 50.13 feet", a radial line to said terminus bears South 62°32'15" East; thence North 61°09'20" East 16.142 meters along said course to the Northeast terminus of said course; thence South 23°08'24" West 11.962 meters to the centerline of Seventh Street; thence North 89°35'37" West 11.104 meters along said centerline to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 193.421 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears South 61°29'11' East; thence Northeasterly 3.548 meters along said curve and Easterly line of said Deed through a central angle of 1°03'04" to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Coordinates and bearings are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances and stationing are grid distances. Multiply distances by 1.00009320 to obtain ground distances. 08-Riv-74--25.8-18971 (18971-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date 10--- /7 -'% LAUD 7XOYAS .I ATWN Exp- Os -70-4 No C*!77 fire OF E T. COJT PST 0 RIV. 74 25.8 10ENSED LAND SURVEYOR DATE APPROVED TO ELSINORE 2,•-/ Ra193.421m A-01* 03'04" L=3.548m —=_= -- RB- 561° 29'11"E R13= 562 °32115"E CL EXIST. RTE. 74 N89° 35'37"W 11.104m ---.: P.O.B. (N60 ° 40'00"E 50.13' PER O.R. 1564/542) N61° 09'20"E ---_716.142m O.R. 1564/542 TO PERRIS EXIST. R/W 11.962m 523° 08'24"W PTN. OF BLOCK V PERRIS HEIGHTS ESTATES M.B. 14/72--74 STATE or CALIFORNIA BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESC DTION SCALE 1:400 • • Exhibit "A" Fee That portion of Lot 55 of Rinehart's Blvd. Tract, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: BEGINNING at the West corner of said Lot 55, said corner being the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 882.300 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears South 36°23'57" East; thence Northeasterly 9.153 meters along the Northwesterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 00°35'40"; thence North 53°00'24" East, 6.100 meters to the North corner of said Lot; thence along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 55 South 32°35'08" East, 19.740 meters; thence leaving said Northeasterly line South 11°15'02" West, 16.074 meters; thence South 48°21'09" West, 4.134 meters to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 55; thence North 32°34'43" West, 30.861 meters along last said line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings used in the above description are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances shown are grid distances. Multiply all distances shown by L00009320 to obtain ground level distances. 08-Riv-7425.1-19752 (19752-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surma prs Act, Sign Professional Date z) % zyb MICHAEL W. LOFY Mune 5471 Number 9-30-2004 �? _ Esp. Date Signa Date OV2o105 SECTION 1 CE EXIST. RTE. 74 TO ELSINORE LOT 57 P.O.B. LOT 56 DIST. 08 R=882.300 a -00 0 35'40" Lz9.153m (30.03') J� LOT 55 A I 1 I A I 4.134m (13.56') S48 ° 21'09"W 11 EXIST. R/W 00 E (:)QLo 1 re es.] LOT 54 COUNTY RIV. ROUTE 74 LOT 53 STATE OF CALIFORNIA RUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND ROUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POST MILE 25.1 SKETCH TR12ACCOMPAN A LEGAL DESCR I PT [ON SCALE i:4O0 TempOraryl Construction Easement MICHAEL W. LOFY Exo., 9-20-2004 No. 5471 LOT 57 EXIST. R/W z LOT 56 4.134m (13.5E') S48 ° 21'09"W 9752-2 F TCE N57° 25'©71'E 15.217m (49.92') LOT 55 COUNTY EXIST. RTE, 74 --,� LOT 54 LOT 53 STATE Of CALIFORNIA EuSINESS,TRANSPORTATION ANO HOUSING AOEY.CY OEP 3OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH O ACCOMPANY A LEGAL (DESCRIPTION SCALE 1:400 POST MILE 25.1 • • • Exhibit "A" Fee That portion of Lot 52 of Rinehart's Blvd. Tract, in the City of Perris, County of Riverside, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: BEGINNING at the West corner of said Lot 52, said corner being the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 882.300 meters, a radial line to said beginning bears South 37°04'09" East; thence Northeasterly 15.201 meters along the Northwesterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 00°59'14" to the North corner of said Lot; thence along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 52 South 32932'57" East, 13.603 meters; thence leaving said Northeasterly line South 48°30'18" West., 15.342 meters to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 52; thence North 32°30'01" West, 14.661 meters along last said line to the PINT OF BEGINNING. Coordinates and bearings used in the above description are on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Distances shown are grid distances. Multiply all distances shown by 1.00009320 to obtain ground level distances. 08-Riv-74-25.1-19753 (19753-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land ,rs Act. Professional Date U1/ -,1/e IF 5 S r -4 1L1L, SECTION 1 CE EXIST. RTE. 74 TO ELSINORE EXIST. R/W P.O.B. RB=537 ° 04'09"E LOT 54 R=882.3©0m =00 5914" L-15.20Im (49.87') LOT 53 S48 ° 3` ©gyp„33 15.342 cowry RSV. TO PERRIS ROUTE 74 EXIST. R/W S32 ° 32'57"E 603m (44.63') LOT 52 LOT 51 LOT 50 POST PILE 25.1 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMS[ HESS, TRANSPCRTAT LON AMtl MO(S[NC AGENCY CEPA- g TRANSPORTA 9' ION SKETCH rill ACCOMPANO A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1:400 Construction Easement 11 5 S, R, , R SECTION 1 EXIST. R/W EXIST. RTE. 74 TO ELSINORE LOT 54 E cDow rfl (NJ LOT 53 548° 301'18"1411 15.342 ' (50.3j TCE -s4B° 30'18"' 5.34`m 60.361 ) LOT 52 rip!,,dc k TO PERRIS EXIST. R/W LOT 51 I LOT 50 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATIoN AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SKETCH -5c6,ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1:400 • • EXHIBIT "B" HIGHWAY 74 CONDEMNATION PARCELS January 12, 2003 UNECONOMIC REMNANT PARCELS PORTION REOUIRED FOR PROJECT CPN APN OWNER ACTIVITY 13696-1 345-060-040 Arebelle Allison Fee • EXHIBIT "B" • LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATS OF UNECONOMIC REMNANTS SEEKING TO ACQUIRE 218 SHEET 1 OF 1 • • SCALE: 1:500 H'LY LINE PM 16475, PING 103/$5 ELY LINE OF LAND TO EHRIQUE GOMEZ INST. 505525 O.R. REC. 11-17.1999 W'LY LINE PM 16475, - . PMB 103/15 POB 5'LY LINE OF LAND TO LEE C. COOLEY INST. 36500 O.R.. REC. 4-20-1970 t. LOT//A ti // x / ,14. / V/ ClAr / f V lik 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAX, (9091 941-0891 Assodated Engineers, Inc. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 NE COR OF POR PCL 1 '0 / 9S / 1/ 2 AREA PARCEL No.s 13696-1 50UARE FEET' 2.281 50UARE METERS: 2119 S'LY COR POR PCL. I PARCEL 3 dry 4 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THECALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PAR 13696-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION > XHIEIT "B" Fee Being a part of that portion of Parcel 1, lying Northwesterly of State Highway 74, as shown on Parcel Map 16475, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 103, Page 15 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said portion of Parcel 1, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters], as described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded February 23, 1972, as Instrument 23247 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said portion of said Parcel 1, and said northwesterly line, North 36° 36' 11" East, 39.031 meters to the northeasterly corner of said portion of Parcel 1, said northeasterly corner being a point on the southerly line of land granted to Lee C. Cooley, recorded April 20, 1970, as Instrument 36500 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along the northerly line of said Parcel Map and said southerly fine, South 89° 40' 20" West; 8.060 meters; thence South 37° 21' 21" West, 25.000 meters to a point on the westerly line of said Parcel Map, said westerly line being the easterly line of '.and described in a Deed to Enrique Gomez, recorded November 17, 1999 as Instrument 505525 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 00° 13' 04" East, 11.415 meters from said most southerly corner; thence southerly along said westerly and easterly line, South 00' 13' 04" West, 11.415 meters to said POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 211.9 square meters (2,281 square Feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-36.5-13696 (13696-1) This real property description has been prepared t' r or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Ly'• Su mayors Date: • • • M19,11)1AMAF,INAOEEE' 1364!DX • AGENDA ITEM 5B • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 03-021, 'Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, by Eminent Domain, That is Necessary for the Realignment of Greenwald Avenue at the Meadowbrook Avenue Intersection With State Route 74" STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 11 Conduct a public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity. 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii . The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain. v. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-021, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS: 349-124- 238 004, 349-124-003, 349-124-021, 349-124-001, 349-124-005, 349- 342-013, 349-342-011, (Project Parcel Nos, 90002-1, 90003-1, 90004-1,-2, 90005-1, 90001-1, 90006-1, 90008-7, -2), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Realignment of Greenwald Avenue at the Meadowbrook Avenue Intersection with State Route 74" BACKGROUND: The project would realign Greenwald Avenue at the Meadowbrook/Greenwald Avenue intersection with State Route 74 (SR 74). The intersection is located in southern Riverside County, east of the City of Lake Elsinore, west of the City of Perris, and south of River Road along SR 74. Greenwald Avenue currently intersects SR 74 at an angle of approximately 45 degrees. The purpose of this project is to improve the safety of the Meadowbrook/Greenwald Avenue intersection with SR 74 by realigning Greenwald Avenue to intersect with SR 74 at a 90 degree angle. This will improve the sight distance at the intersection for vehicles traveling east on both SR 74 and Greenwald Avenue that wish to turn from one roadway to the other. This Project wilt be constructed in conjunction with the State Route 74 Realignment Measure "A" Project The County of Riverside Real Property Department is acting as right-of-way acquisition agent for the Commission in the acquisition of the named parcels. Offers of just compensation to purchase the parcels described in RON 03-021 were prepared and initially presented to the property owners of record by letters on or before July 19, 2002. The offers have either not been accepted to date or the escrow has not closed on the named parcels. Negotiations are ongoing and will continue with the property owners who have not settled. The holding of the hearing or the Commission's approval of a resolution of necessity does not preclude the negotiations. It may be necessary to acquire some or all of the parcels described in Exhibit "A" by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is the approval of a resolution of necessity. Prior to approving a resolution of necessity (RON), the Commission must give each person whose property is to be acquired, and whose name and address appears on the bast equalized County Tax Assessor's roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on: Whether the public interest and necessity require the proposed project; • • 239 • • • 2. Whether the proposed project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; Whether the acquisition of the real property is necessary for the project; Whether portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain; and 5. Whether the required offers to acquire the real property have been made. Note: The fair market value of the property is not an issue at the hearing. The notice must be mailed by first class mail and state the intent of the Commission to consider the approval of the resolution, the right of each person to appear and be heard on these issues, and that the failure to file a written request to appear will result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission must then hold a hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed may appear and be heard. The required notice was mailed to the property owners, identified in Exhibit "A" of RON 03-021, on February 21, 2003. DISCUSSION: The following addresses the findings that are required for approval of the resolution of necessity; (1 ) THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE PROPOSED PROJECT The existing Greenwald Avenue intersects existing State Route 74 at a highly skewed angle. Current Ca►trans design standards require streets intersecting the state highway to be at approximately 90 degrees for safety and operation reasons. State Route 74 will not be realigned in the vicinity of the Greenwald Avenue. Therefore, Greenwald Avenue must be realigned to intersect State Route 74 at approximately 90 degrees to comply with Caltrans design standards. 240 At the September 13, 2000 Commission meeting, ROTC committed to be the lead agency for the Greenwald Avenue realignment project at its connection to State Route 74, fund the additional cost of the project, and complete the project no later than two years after the completion of the State Route 74 widening project near the subject intersection. (2) THE PROJECT IS PLANNED OR LOCATED IN A MANNER THAT WILL BE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH THE GREATEST PUBLIC GOOD AND THE LEAST PRIVATE INJURY The SR 74 roadway realignment follows the existing alignment as much as practical. Changes to the SR 74 horizontal and vertical alignment at some locations were necessary to meet current Caltrans design standards. The SR 74 project was designed in such a manner as to create the optimum benefit to the existing community through which it passes while requiring the least amount of property take. One of the significant improvements of the SR 74 project is the realignment of the local intersections such as Greenwald Ave. to improve sight distance for motorists entering and leaving SR 74. The connection of Greenwald Ave to SR 74 was realigned on a radius that ends in a 90 degree connection to SR 74. The proposed Greenwald realignment is acceptable to both the County of Riverside and Caltrans. The environmental document explored several alternatives that studied other solutions to address the problems resulting from the current skewed connection. Both the public and County of Riverside preferred the alternative being proposed. (3) THE ACQUISITION OF THE PARCELS ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT The acquisition of parcels identified in RON 03-021 is required in order to meet current Caltrans design standards and is a condition for the approval of the SR 74 realignment project. The project can not be completed without the acquisition of the named parcels. (4) PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY MAY BE ACQUIRED BY EMINENT DOMAIN AS REMNANTS The list of parcels that include uneconomic remnants is attached as Page 1 of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-021. The legal descriptions of the real property that the Commission is seeking to acquire are attached to the proposed Resolution of Necessity as Exhibit "A". For the parcels identified in Exhibit "B" of RON 03-021 a substantial portion of the property is being acquired because it is necessary for the re -alignment of Greenwald Avenue with • 241 • • lb) • Highway 74. The remainders of those parcels are being acquired on the grounds that they are remnant parcels. Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410 authorizes a public agency to acquire a remnant parcel, even though it is not necessary for the proposed project, and subsection (a) of Section 1240.410 defines a "remnant" as a "remainder or portion thereof that will be left in such size, shape, or condition as to be of little market value." At the time the parcels described in the proposed Resolution of Necessity were appraised by the Commission's appraisers, Robert S. Perdue & Associates, Mr. Perdue concluded that those remainder parcels were remnants, as defined in Section 1240.410. In order to distinguish what property the Commission is acquiring based on public use and necessity and what portion is an uneconomic remnant, two metes and bounds descriptions are provided. Page 1 of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-021 identifies the parcels that include uneconomic remnants. The rest of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-021 provides the legal descriptions of the portions of those parcels identified on page 1 of Exhibit "B" that the Commission is acquiring for public use and necessity and the re -alignment of Greenwald Avenue with State Route 74 (the project) . Exhibit "A" to RON 03-021 provides the complete description of all of the parcels to be acquired, including the uneconomic remnants. Commission staff has not obtained a separate metes and bounds legal description of the uneconomic remnants. The remnants would constitute those portions of the parcels identified on page 1 of Exhibit "B" that are not described in the legal descriptions that follow in Exhibit "B". THE OFFERS OF JUST COMPENSATION HAVE BEEN MADE Appraisals were prepared by Robert Shea Perdue & Associates to establish the fair market value of the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty that RCTC is seeking to acquire. The Commission reviewed the results of the original appraisals at the July 10, 2003 Commission meetings. The Commission directed staff to transmit the approved offers of just compensation to the property owners. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty as established by the approved appraisals and as required by Section 7267,2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible for the property cited above, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty through eminent domain to ensure that access and 242 the necessary property rights will be available to meet the critical time frames associated with the development of this important project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no new fiscal impact from this action. The Commission approved the current budget for the Greenwald Realignment project in conjunction with the. SR 74 realignment project at the May 8, 2002 Commission meeting, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Commission approved Resolution No. 02-009, a Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting a Negative Declaration for the Greenwald Realignment Project from SR 74 to Wallace Avenue on February 9, 2002 to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA}. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The notice of this public hearing was mailed on February 21, 2003 (more than 15 days prior to meeting) to each property owner of record. Attachments. 1. Table 1 "Greenwald Avenue Realignment Parcels" March 12, 2003 2. Project Map 3, Resolution of Necessity No. 03-021 • • 243 • • • GREENWALD AVENUE REALIGNMENT CONDEMNATION PARCEL MARCH 12, 2003 PARCEL APN OWNER ACTIVITY 90002-1 349-124-004 Rosa Valdivia Fee 90003-1 349-124-003 Larry & Julie Roberts Fee 90004-1, -2 349-124-021 Verizon California, Inc. _ Fee 90005-1 349-124-001 La Verne M. Biniasz, et.al. Fee 90001-1 349-124-005 Edwin Borsheim Gallagher Fee 90006-1 349-342-013 _ Ironclad, LLC Fee 90008-1, -2 349-342-011 James Kirk Harns Fee, TCE 244 • PROJECT MAP 245 • • • RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY (M ARCH 13, 20023 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSP ORTATION COMMISSI ON STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPA RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY NEAR PERRIS FROM 0.6 KM EA ST OF WASSON CANYON ROAD TO 7TH STREET tO be Auo17ISn nt etl 6y$t[ndor0 Alcoa dot e0 July, 1999 ff \ C i{$ ,..,;c3. ^ f9 C[ELL J` F&kiR �Le„ SR 74 PARCELS - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY NQ CPN APN GRANTO R CCMAENT 2 13610.1 349-080.021 CAROLYN I ACNAl4ET,AL._ 3 13611-1. 2 349-080-036 JUAN NARTINE2,ET,Ux. 4 13612-1 349-080-046 MD AR CO. ET. UX. 5 13614-1,2 349090-053 LINDY LEE LONG, ET.AL. 6 13613-1.2 349-090-014 WILLIAM PAYNE,ET. UX. 7 13817.1 349-090-058 DORSEY L.FURR,ET. AL. E 13618.1 349.090-059 HENRY A. LIHDEI,[JTN, ET. UX. 9 13649.1 349-080-009 ALEJANDRO J. 2LIRITA 10 13620-1 349.080-047 RAYN E GATES,ET.UX, 1 13620-1,2,3 349-080-002 LYNN 691 TTp9.ET. .AL. IZ 13622.1 344-080-003 LYN N ORITTON,ET,AL, 13 13624-1 349.080.001 LYNN CRITTON,ET.AL, 8 81, rILrAL.1' CI'_ TO M_ 1.-1U N W Now*, r I..,H... .,., .. .....W..r... , .0 M.. �.. RIVERSIDE CO ONTY TR ANSPORTATIO N CR&L1S5I0N 3560 UNIYERSITY AVE S UITE 100 518080IOE, CA 92501 SC ENCIREERIRC • ,+1311 SAL1t8RlIA AYL lurtt , 0. rleTprv,4.LE,C A973$2 • Cont ro ct No, 1 06-464111 • RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY NO. 03-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DECLARING THAT THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE REALTY IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APNS 349-124-001, 349-124-003, 349-124-004, 349-124-005, 349-124- 021, 349-342-011 & 349-342-013 (PROJECT PARCEL NOS. 90001- 1, 90002-1, 90003-1, 90004-1, 90004-2, 90005-1, 90006-1, 90008-1 & 90008-2), BY EMINENT DOMAIN IS NECESSARY FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF GREENWALD AVENUE AT THE IMEADOWBROOK AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 74 INTERSECTION WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the 'Commission") proposes to acquire fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty in certain reap property, located in Perris, California, more particularly described as Assessor Parcel Nos. 349-124-001, 349-124-003, 349- 124-004, 349-124-005, 349-124-021, 349-342-011 & 349-342-013 (Project Parcel Nos. 90001-1, 90002-1, 90003-1, 90004-1, 90004-2, 90005-1, 90006-1, 90008-1 & 90008.2), for purposes of the realignment of Greenwald Avenue at the Meadowbrook Avenue and State Route 74 intersection, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 9:00 a.m., at the County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers, at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission and each person whose property is to be acquired by eminent domain was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission is specifically authorized, by section 1240,410 of the California code of Civil Procedure, to acquire remnant parcels by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now approve a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; 247 NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2, Public Use. The public use for which the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty are to be acquired is for the realignment of Greenwald Avenue at the Meadowbrook Avenue and State Route 74 intersection, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire by eminent domain property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal descriptions, plats and description of the real property and improvements to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identi- fication. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following; (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) Portions of the property described in Exhibit "A" are necessary for the proposed project, and those portions are described in Exhibit „B,,; (d) The remainders of the parcels described in Exhibit "A," after separating out those portions described in Exhibit "B," are remnant parcels as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410; and (e) Pursuant to section 1245.230(c}(4) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, that either the offers required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code have been made to the owners or owners of record, or the offers have not been made because the owners cannot be located with reasonable diligence. • 248 Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use(s). Some or all of the real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights -of -way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights -of -way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. in the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. • • Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the real property being acquired that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property and improvements in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property and improvements at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property and improvements that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action or other proceedings or transactions required to acquire the subject real property and improvements. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation of the project for which the real property and improvements are being acquired. 249 Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12°' day of March, 2003. Ron Roberts, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • 250 • EXHIBIT "A" • • Legal Descriptions and Plats of Real Property Seeking to Acquire 251 Definitions of Legal Rights to be Acquired "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, refers to complete or absolute ownership of the property "Temporary construction easement," refers to the right of plaintiff, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project as referred to in the complaint, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights Prior to termination of this easement, property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, nor shall property owners plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of plaintiff Plaintiff shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time as plaintiff determines in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation to property owners No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under, or over this easement without obtaining the prior written consent of plaintiff The duration of the rights under this easement shall not be for less than twenty four (24) months from the commencement of construction on the applicable parcel and not more than thirty (30) months of the date possession of the applicable parcel as authorized by court order RV LUT11.A R4,1 1 138 EX IE;TAz PAGE_L_. • Sheet 1 of 2 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 29 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated on the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fled in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows BEGINNING at the intersection of the southerly line of the north one-half of said Lot 29 and the westerly line of said Lot 29, thence South 89°36'2.2" East, 2 843 meters (9 33 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 82 356 meters (270 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 73°57'24' West, thence southerly along said curve an arc length of 20 090 meters (65 91 feet), through a central angle of 13°58'37" to a point on the southerly lone of said Lot 29, thence North 89°36'22" West, 0 016 meters (0 05 feet) along said southerly line to the southwest corner of said Lot 29, thence North 00'56'48" East, 19 813 meters (65 00 feet) along said westerly line of Lot 29 to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 20 1 square meters (216 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (Greenwald Avenue) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property This real property .escrrptron has with the Profes o.ai L Date " 1971111 GREeWILLntlru+h{'1QFi01 1 DOC pared by 5ie, under my direction, on conformance EXH1Bri PAGEA_ Q GREENWALD AVENUE NO0 ° 56'48"E 0.016m N00 ° 56'48"E (0.05')' . 19.8!3m (65.(0') POB EXHIBIT"A" SHEET 2 OF 2 • m N X (7) 0 0 N87' 56'01"W (R) 4UIm (299.90') (2701.20 L ,2C•09Crn (65, 91') 90.57') 4/. N73 ° 57'24"W (RV LA 2 90001-1 :.--- 0 cn c., in co E rn rn •17- C\.1 Er-) E in m ro PROGRESS l CIE co z SUEID I VISION MAP LOT 1' , e, I /56 NO0 ° 56'42"E ! 19.813m I- (65.00') --\, IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNFA Associated Engineers, Inc 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91T54 TO— (909) 966-1982 FAXi (9191 94§-0994 DISTRICT COLINtY ROIJ E I(1LOPOST AREA PARCEL. No.i 90001-1 SGUARI NT! 216 CrtfIAOe Lr1tt,t. 7n 1 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 5. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1,000111335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 90001-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY F x 1 �1- REScilA Pr_TT O",N Sheet 1 of 2 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the north one-haif of Lot 29 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps. in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows BEGINNING at the intersection of the southerly line of said north one-half of Lot 29 and the westerly line of said Lot 29, thence South 89"36,22" East, 2 643 meters (9 33 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 82 356 meters (270 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 73°57'24" West, thence northeasterly along said curve an arc length of 21 612 meters (70 91 feet), through a central angle of 15°02'08" to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 29, thence North 89°36'22" West, 11 129 meters (36 51 feet) along said northerly line to the northwest corner of said Lot 29, thence South 00'°56'48" West, 19 813 meters (65 00 feet) along said westerly line of Lot 29 to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 128 2 square meters (1,380 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, rf any, appurtenant to the above -described property I and to the adjoining public way (Greenwald Avenue) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property. This real prope with the Prof « eX14l�H I,Y! M11 i •. 1 ared by :� , + under my direction, in conformance EXHTiT A55 PAGE 4 Q GREENWALD POB AVENUE EXIST R/1 SCALE: 1:500 P,QDRESS l VE SUODI Vl Sl ON MAP MJ 16/56 2.843m (9.33,) IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT Associated Engineers, Inc Spat EAST SHELN SWEET OW rr RIG Ca~ 91164 TEL [9991960 13N:` rix+003194h-0101 r&JrIT* ROUTE TIi9T°OSI Et N73' 57'24"W 0 cJ 0 m N89' 36'22"W LOT N00 a 56'48`IE EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 NOO' 5G'48"E 19.813m /, (65.00') -- 0.9 th a -6002- I---- I!) Lri 0 E w Cci co 29 r a cr▪ l cJ 0 N8936'22"W 0,1 NO0'256`42"E 19.813rn (+85.04`) AREA PARCEL N.o c 90002-1 5112 EE'' 1,380 4 ti? N58' 55'16"W 447 • THE BEARINGS AND OISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASEL ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF I'9B'_ TO OBE. TAIN GROUND LETIPLY VEL CES 0 STASHONCES.BT I.00OIO PARCEL 90002-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY FXHits3NLES 6€ ._ • • • EXHIBIT "A'° 9000.3- 1 Fee Bung all of Lot 28 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed In Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County This real proper .escripti has enprepared b e, or under my direction, in conformance with the Prof: sis al I. Signatu e expires 9/30/05 Date askrafENNyu Ak-g vmex> > crx KI, S .143 l5 Q (.P 0 NO 4430 Ir' Exp 09/30/05 EX1--11 B T2 PAGE , • 349-12 • 'I AAr1 10to ae l W• 114 it cE novae TR A 6518 bad 399 �'�1 7i0 24 .0,• . 1'. - p @ 45 4 i .1t (25- "I� 0.9644 • liii 3 ® 45 42 0 70 0 , CJ 41 S1 V 0 b 52 0 . 0 33 35 0 . 0 JO • 34 (a 37 } '. . 43 11 s F 1 16 • 7Pd r4 rr 4[4 +,0 l/rr I7 lf rr n ▪ 14{ 47 n 40 • / ra Vlhr 4u 1a4 . 44 rr - .4•4+44•4 11 re • f1a,s-4w 14 1111,14c4.1.:04 00... Ms -M 11 • +44-71 4 1 • fted i1laa4 14 +f ro pr-ri gr a PO • /A IN 1 P n • 51/2 h114/1/4 SEC 22,T 55,5' 4W Jae 66 5.!_J Z. .14 4-4.•` 95 •1 •,y l 6r e J f41a Ct e4 6D 0 7 R} 69 C) 0 at ,yy I4 7 tY 0 ® & 121 JA- 71 0 0 SC - - 7? V 1 .J 44 e '9 s. re• 73 ® Ze3 S4 q r4 09 tiC 77 • l, ra F7 CI JM Y 5/ / ,. 76 i a a k • .a 1:V r las ,1 06 0 . as "� J125 , 1070 2 : ® 124 S "so /LR 0 0 12.1 119 0 8 132 110 CI 121 22 Is C /4 120 14 V • ® 119 III V Ile /I4 ® 11 117 • 1/5 L;1 R V 1/6 e J4•• J4a rre E f11r n rl__ /46 ' _I L`.v./ /65 x/444 0 144 A i 147 0 i 4 J14 144 0 + 8. 163 149 0 0 162 4• 1 130 0 123 „r« 151 0 V 149 - - J{114• Ii2 07 ti.++ 159 aa • ISI 0 0 /J6 111 4 1 154 }. .J r 0 +57 �I • J,4 � ti 'SS a • €J 15a Z Jai, l4 l, r 17_ r • M B 16/56 PROGRE SS/Vi- 5U60/VISION JUN E, 1 972 011 0 W,5 72/44 DEC 0 7 2000 ASSESSORS 4/A P 94 349PG17 RIVERSI DE C OUNTY, C4 .LI F Sheet 1 of 2 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 27 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows COMMECING at southwest corner of said Lot 27, thence South 89°36'22" East, 4 267 meters (14 00 feet) along said southerly line of said Lot 27 to a point on a line that is parallel and distant 4 267 meters (14 00 feet) easterly from the westerly line of said Lot 27, said point also being on the easterly fine of an easement granted to the County of Riverside in a deed recorded March 15, 1985 as Instrument No 53486, Official Records of said Riverside County, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing South 89°36'22" East, 15 362 meters (50 40 feet) along said southerly 'dine of Lot 27, thence North 34°40'07" West, 26 378 meters (86 54 feet) to a point on said easterly line of the easement to the County of Riverside, thence South 00°56'48' West, 21 592 meters (70 84 feet) to POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 165 8 square meters (1,785 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the ad;oining public way (Greenwald Avenue) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described properly This real property scription has en pr - pared by with the Prates, Signature Date L S 4430 xpires 9/30/05 under my direction, in conformance SdN N 1M� 4c -c? NO 4430 Exp 09/30/05 EXH1BiT q PAGE__5L_ 01 CO z POC TPOE Q GREENWALD N00" 56'48"E AVENUE NO0 ° 56'48"rE -- 39.626m 0!30.01'9 2-1.592m 18.0344- (70.84!) _ - - (59.17') eNj `0 CM A24° 9 6/ 07 07 fj $,6,, 30 E 03, Q ,, al Q PROGR.ESS I V SURD I Vl S J ON MAP M,8, 16./56 E O • NO0 ` 56'42"E 39.626m (130.01') IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Associated Engineers, Inc „n�x.l 5rrrz� s orrtPI0 ICI r9O91 SC," 00, r r, ,9f5Sr 94i G'•'r (Ural , 1,fe)11- ,I ROAD EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, RECORED 3/15/85, AS INST. NO. 53486, O.R. 1-, EXIST R/W 1-1-- 4.267m (14.00'1 SCALE: 1:500 Rrit AREA PC CEL i1..: 90004-1 Sou,.t rrzt, 1,785 • .'I ' ,. r,r. • (R) EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 SENOLA AVENUE ---- THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES CES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6 MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 100010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES PARCEL 90004-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DCSCRIPT10N EXH1PIT A PAGE q • Sheet 1 of 2 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 27 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said Lot 27, thence South 89°36'22" East, 50 405 meters (165 37 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing South 89"36'22" East, 19 602 meters (64 31 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 100 644 meters (330 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears South 70°36'55" East, said curve hereinafter referred to as Curve "A", thence southwesterly along said curve an arc length of 42 619 meters (139 82 feet), through a central angle of 24°15'46, thence Course "8" South 43°38'52" West, 4 683 meters (15 36 feet) to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 27, thence North 89°36'22" West, 25 110 meters (82 38 feet) along said southerly line of Lot 27 to a point on a line that is parallel and distant 18 288 meters (60 00 feet) northwesterly from said Course "B", thence North 43°38'52" East, 21 889 meters (71 81 Feet) along said parallel line to the beginning of a curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 82 356 meters (270 20 feet), said curve being concentric with and distant 18 288 meters (60 00 feet) northwesterly from said Curve "A°, thence northeasterly along said curve, an arc length of 28 490 meters (93 47 feet), through a central angle of 19°49'14" to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 893 5 square meters (9,618 square feet) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone V1 Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property This real property description has been pr pared b +r under my direction, in conformance with the Profes I La ors Signature Date expires 9130105 EXHdBT_ PAGE I( E:' r— C LOa NO0 ° 56'48"E �Y NO0 ° 56148"E — 39.626m (130.01') A' 2I.592m 18..034m \4--- (70.84') (59.17')4 1 W nn LL7 1 E 0 r tv co E U 0 N tip 01 co z 0.578m (1.90') LOT 27 PROGRESS J VE SUBJ J VI SI ON MAP 1'1,S, 16/56 NO0 ° 56'12"E 39.626m (l30.0E') IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Associated Engineers, Inc 141, 1_, .1 ''Iau'i SII,Lc 0"TAPI( ;a �r�r I�r 'a71} 9150-i1B'' r9?is 941 -OP'' Fr':1F1f-1 a+IL+`i' j", Q GREENWALD AVENUE --, ROAD EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, RECORED 3/15/85, AS INST. NO. 53486, O.R. 01 01 4V E 0 01 E rn EXIST R/W 4.267m (14.00') PGC SCALE:.1:500 TPOB AREA PARCEL NO i S0tiAft$ FEET, soileg6 TEDsa 9000E-2 9.1618 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 SENOLA AVENUE [4i • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6 MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1 0001033' TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES PARCEL 90004-2 0 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY EXH ". • • Exhibit "A" Fee Uneconomic Remnant THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,. AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS LOT 26 OF PROGRESSIVE TRACT AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 16 PAGE 56 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APN 349-124-001 CTPN 90005-1 EXHIBITA,3 PAGE 10 0 m 349- /2 iv , r f rr /. /p/ ar rl ,r a l rc MO. /V i1 Fsd 0 33 l7p sy OS r-4 KNf. 1C It V.& f6a'1M'L'',e H Jre-rr J., fie riahl It vre fa -7r al 33 ,e s re. t rr r • TRA 65C I CI 4r 4 r Ar POP 28 0 ra- lac. ef J! �EJ 0 j7 57/2 NW 1/4 SEC 22,r 55, R 4W J r eu VrAP 66 0 I u J %'rc r.9 54 `a - - Z $7 �,V R 69 0 3!I 7i MT 9t 7a V 0 r Jr .' AO' t, 0 0 Id J/J AA 77 Q t:J 7s iel l a- 14 �+ l91 ' f 4 ♦ TT 1 447 .r 11 73 0 k, 1(�f 76 �e8 .f+/.i 415 16/56 PROGRESSIVE SU5DI V/SI©N JUNE, 1972 L'CC s' 77 Y arr .i s a, •sw AO9 ,yyJ, ti larz � C� U.4e ; AN 0 0 1.7.1 { x09 0 0 a NO 0 0 IV , �`/ ' e2 V 1 Ml { Ili a AFA tent *. 1 ! d7 ti A. ,/(�� N3 0 qa tJ Adi "-AA._ i, .4•4. i D ol s n372/60 DEC 0 7 2000 ASSESSOR SkAP &K J 4P PG 7Z PI P IRS/UE CUUNTY, CALIF • • 6� Exhibit "A" Fee THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS LOT 25 OF PROGRESSIVE SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 16 PAGE 56 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APN 349-342-013 CTPN 90006-1 • EXHIBIT PAGE 14 ��jj 734, —II 349- 34 T R A. 6519 •c r ti:Zb c."0-1 h1 a 16/ 5+5 AS'O rR F5S,VF SU BDIVISION ! 'CM = .14. a' 1 FOR NW 1/4 SEC.22, T_3S,R.4W j r I ®I , I t ' 1 1 , k 1 4 Lae • I r r I � , � e � f Py 24 •I ! 3 .S T M e - u ..rr . ar-LA 'Pn A rl 414 .1P L 0/ n 4SSZ5SCIO+ Y+1P JX 349 PG 3•I RIYeR5Idf tDUVTYM CALI F • Sheet 1 of 2 • • • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 23 as snown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, fled in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows COMMENCING at the northwest comer of said Lot 23, thence South 89°23'20" East, 10 471 meters (34 35 feet) along the northerly line of said Lot 23, thence South 20°08'36" West, 31 845 meters (104 48 feet) to point on the westerly line of said Lot 23, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 00°56'48" West, 9 779 meters (32 08 feet) to the southwest corner of said Lot 23, thence South 89°27'29" East, 19 184 meters (62 94 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 104 911 meters (344 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 26°08'22" East, thence northwesterly along said curve an arc length of 14 562 meters (47 78 feet), through a central angle of 07°59'10", thence North 25°09'20" West, 9 492 meters (31 14 feet) to a point on a line that is distant North 20°08'35" Fast, 4 390 meters (14 40 feet) from the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 20908'35" West, 4 390 meters (14 40 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 96 2 square meters (1.035 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (Greenwald Avenue) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property This real property ■ _ cription has .-en pr red b : - .r under my direction, in conformance with the Profes • fI Lan. ry +'*rs 1 �l Signature M i iY y Lice fj:-' expires 9/30/05 Date ' lwf j r aMY+lLGA 1 MSC 430 EXHIBIT_ &7 PAGE. GREENWALD AVENUE 1.0 PRDCRESS J VE SURD1 V1SI DN M A P ,a, 36/56 SCALE: 1:500 N89* 27`29"W TPOB 9.779m (32.08') ter (13 rn cv E co r- N00 ° 56'481"E 39.792m (130.55') - 30.013m (98.47') 8q °8- �' 360 S Q2 0 N, u(.?„7574.,57,./ T !p `` + 98 J Teyrii 4 - N00' 32'31"E 5.000m E �- a (16.40') o cn n a'Tti ` NOO ° 32'31"E 5.000m (16.40') LOT 23 N00 55'1©"W 39.681m (130.19') IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SJ.L6T STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL (909/ 98[)-1962 FA%i 54091 94l-0641 DISTRICT OB COLN TT RIVERSIDE ROUTE KJLOPOST 74 33.65 AREA PARCEL No.' SQUARE FEETI SQUAR>L €AS I 90006-I 1.035 96.2 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 3 Pac N N89 ° 23'20"W j 10.471m ,- (34.35`] LO CJ rE- r- 00 0 000 N89' 23'20"W r • THE BEARINGS AND OISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM CF 1903, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN 8Y 1.0001©335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 90008-1 0 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY GAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT PAIDP Sheet 1 of 2 • • EXHIBIT "]A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 23 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows COMMENCING at the southwest corner of said Lot 23, thence South 89°27'290 East, 21 180 meters (69 49 feet) along the southerly line of said Lot 23 to the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence North 00°32'31" East, 5 000 meters (16 40 feet), thence South 89'27'29" East, 16 000 meters (52 49 feet), thence South 00°32'31' West, 5 000 meters (16 40 feet) to a point on said southerly line of Lot 23, thence North 89°27'29" West, 16 000 meters (52 49 feet) along said southerly fine to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 80 0 square meters (861 square feet) The rights acquired herein shall terminate upon completion of construction The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property This real property description has • en pre.ared by ,• - .r under my direction, in conformance with the Profe : o. al Lan e ors A Signature Lice Date expires 9/30/05 M 11! flf 1- Vecas1 -2'L�IC S 430 EXHiB;T 1 PAGEE GREENWALD SR SHEET 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT"A" AVENUE PnC 9.779m (32.08') N00.56'48"E 3 r,r - 39.792m (130.55') - 30.013m (98.47') 4 ° . cL- E OD tID PROGRESS] VE SU5IDJ V1SI DN MAP 11,e, i6/56 SCALE: I:a00 N89° 27'29"W 4.390m (14.4x) \` N89* 23`20"W `y 10.471m (34.35') 72.184m (236.82') Apb, �SfBq� ,, a 01 9 1,9 - - •'›(!? (3', r - N00 ° 32`31"E �' 5.000m Ez-c° (16.40') 0O1c*J Q C C.J uoInP ! CO z NO0 ° 32'31"E 5.000m (I6.40') TCE 0008 LOT 23 NO0 ° 55'!0"W 39.681m (130.19') IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA w Cv IE r--- 00 CO N89`23'20" THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORPiPA COORDINATE SYSTEPA OF 1993. ZONE 6. PAEILTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY/00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc, 330 EMT SFOLBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEl.. (0) 980-f3B2 FAX1 C909184rol% AREA INS COtQ4TY RCUTE EILOPOST 08 RIVER sax 74 33.65 PARCEL Nos 90008-2 SG1JA FEET: 861 `O11 7iC&TERSi 60.0 PARCEL 90008-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY E X H glr`17# DEsWE — • • • EXHIBIT "B" GREENWALD AVENUE REALIGNMENT CONDEMNATION PARCEL MARCH 12, 2003 UNECONOMIC REMNANT PARCEL PORTION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT PARCEL APN _ OWNER ACTIVITY 90005-1 349-124-001 La Verne M. Biniasz, et.al. Fee 90006-1 349-342-013 Ironclad„ LLC Fee 271 • • EXHIBIT .8" Legal Descriptions and Plats of Uneconomic Remnants Seeking to Acquire 272 Sheet 1 of 2 Exhibit "B" • • Fee Being a portion of Lot 26 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows COMMENCING at the southwest corner of said Lot 26, thence South 89°36'22" East, 50 405 meters (165 37 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing South 89°36'2.2" East, 19 602 meters (64 31 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 100 644 meters (330 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears South 70°36'55" East, said curve hereinafter referred to as Curve "A", thence northeasterly along said curve an arc length of 21 455 meters (70 39 feet), through a central angle of 12°12'50", thence North 53°39'14" East, 21 149 meters (63 39 feet) to the northeast corner of said Lot 26, thence North 89°36'22" West, 50 777 meters (166 59 feet) along the northerly line of said Lot 26, thence South 48°43'48" East, 20 229 meters (66 37 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 82 356 meters (270 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears South 80°54'05" East, said curve being concentric with and distant 18 288 meters (60 00 feet) northwesterly from said Curve "A", thence southwesterly along said curve, an arc length of 21 170 meters (69 46 feet), through a central angle of 14°43'42" to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 837 8 square meters (9,018 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (Senola Avenue) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property This real property d- caption has b -en prepared by e, .r under my direction, in conformance with the Profess Date tl19913%.GREEPAN .Dhi EX -1B Ta_ FADE 273 NO0 ° 56'48"E GREENWALD AVENUE��`•, C.A1111_11L Q SHEET 2 OF 2 ROAD EASEMENT TO THE P © C COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, RECORED 3/15/85, AS INST. NO. 53486, O.R. N70* 36'55"W (F) PROGRESSIVE: Suen1 V 1 S l o M f l M' . 8 J J6/56 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Associated Engineers, Inc 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL r909i 980-1982 FAA 59091 941-0891 STRICT 08 COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST RIVERSIDE 74 33 65 NOO ° 56'48"E - 33.527m (110.00'} NO0* 56'42"E 33.527m (110.00') -_ THE BEARINGS APO DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0001031 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL No.' 90005-1 SWAM FEET1 9.016 SOOARE MEtE S: B3T.B 274 z w G1< 00 01 J aT (N C► z EW N.V) a c (41 T cJ N to E 1- 0 Ln PARCEL 90005-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPAAD EXH`th?#L+'ES gE1 Exhibit "B" Fee • • • Being a portion of Lot 25 as shown an the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated terntory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows COMMENCING at the northwest comer of said Lot 25, thence South 89°29'11" East, 29 602 meters (97 12 feet) along the northerly line of said Lot 25 to the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing South 89°29'11" East, 61 785 meters (202 71 feet) along said northerly line to the northeast corner of said Lot 25, thence South 00'55'10" West, 35 636 meters (116 92 feet) to the southeast corner of said Lot 25, thence North 89°36'22" West, 57 998 meters (190 28 feet) along the southerly tine of said Lot 25, thence North 44°50'33" East, 17 607 meters (57 76 feet) to the beginning of a non -tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 78 089 meters (256 20 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 66°29'53" East, thence northwesterly along said curve an arc length of 28 211 meters (92 56 feet), through a central angle of 20°41'57" to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 1,871 9 square meters (20,149 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (Senate Avenue) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone VI Multiply distances shown by 1 00010335 to obtain ground level distances See Sheet 2 for a plat depicting the above -described property This real property desenphon has x•een pr- cared , or under my direction, in conformance with the Pri fesc. • I Lance`' ryJors " Signature Date fE* r= Lice 1 . - expires 9130105 .4 V$91s ybY HL,.Qmh'c.xrI me LS EXHtBl 1 °--' PAGE.. _ 275 GREENWALD NOW ° 56'48"E AVENUE , r m E 0 .ccr al coI 16) 0 z IMP. GREENWALD AVENUE oD 0 0' O, in Lfl NOO 56'118"E 35.826m (117.54') —1 POC 4/5717. 90006-1 0,1 Ln CO NOO ° 55'10"E 35.636m (116.92') IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1943 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY I.000IO33 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Exhibit "B" SHEET 2 OF 2 • PROGRESS] VE SUthI VISION MAP Mif.. 16/56 SCALEtk500 A•., =.oc &11ed En&s&r8, Eno. 331 EAST SUtL.6Y STREET ONTARIO. CA 9864 TEL. (9O9) 9$0-1982 FAx, i9O9) 441-0891 i)ISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE RULOPOST O8 RIVE $1)E 14 39.65 AREA PARC L ot0.1 90006-1 SOUAR$ FEET+ 20149 SQUARE tea 4B7L9 SKETCH TO ACCOMPA• E" H1TE L8DESCNI! • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, BechtelProject Manager Louie Martin, Bechtel Project Controls Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Contracts Cost and Schedule Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending January 31, 2003. BACKGROUND INFORMATION; The attached material depicts the current cost and schedule status on contracts reported by projects, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending January 31, 2003. Attachment: Monthly Report - January 2003 277 RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY/RAIL PROJECTS BUD GET REP ORT BY ROUTE COM MISSION C ONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES PR OJECT AUTHORIZED CO MMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 01/31/03 TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE ROUTE 60 PROJECTS Fin al Design/ROW HOV 601215 to Redlands Blvd. 57.700,000 56,838,641 88 8% 5780,683 55.374,763 78.6 % (2042)(3000) SUBTOTAL ROUTE 60 57,700,000 56,838,641 88.8% 5780,663 55,374,763 78.6% ROUTE 74 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ/ROW (R02041 9954,9966, $69,847,655 529,514,368 42 .3% 54,049.530 519,555,012 66.3 % (R02142) (R0 2141) (2140) (3001) (3009) SUBTO TAL ROUTE 74 569,847,655 529,514,368 42.3% 54,049,530 519,555,012 66,3 % ROUTE 79 PROJECTS En gineering/Environ,/RO W (3003) 52,894,497 ' 52,793,935 96.5% 545,710 5955,577 34.2% Realignment study & Right turn Panes (R09961) SUBTOTAL: ROUTE 79 52,$94 ,497 52,793,935 96.5% 545,710 5955,577 34,g% ROUTE 86 PROJECTS Avenue 58 to Avenue 66 (Segment 2) J 520,253,000 519,500.000 96.3 % Project Complete 518,060.000 92.6% J 533,860,000 533,760000 99.7 % Project C ompl ete 531,013,510 91.9% 13 SUBTOTAL ROUTE 86 554,113,000 553,260.000 50 $49,073,510 92.1% ROUTE 91 PROJECTS SoundwalllAux lane design, RO W and construction 511. 902,100 510,374,324 87.2% 53,481 59,527,668 91.8% (R09101,9337,9847,9861,9848,9832,9969,2043) (2058) (2144) (2136) (3600, 3602) Van Buren Blvd. Frwy Hook Ramp (R03008) 52.954,000 52,954,000 100.0% 50 52,109,519 71.4% Mary Street to 7th Street HOV design & RDW(3005) 51,274,430 51.062,025 83.3% 573,005 5411,804 38 .8% Sndwall Landscaping (R09933,9946.2059.3601) 51.603.450 51,603,450 100.0% 50 5852,213 53.1% SUBTOTAL RO UTE 91 $77,733,9813 515, 993,799 90.2% $76,486 :: 512,901,204 80.7% ROUTE 111 PROJECTS (R09219. 9227,9234,9523,9525,9530,9637,9540) 516,946,856 515,530,856 91,6% SO $14,945.485 96.2°. 3410,9635,9743,9849-9851,9857.9629 (3400-3405) SUBTOTAL ROUTE 111 516,946856 515,630,866 91.6% $0 544;845,4815:- : 96.2% 0 Page 1 of 3 • RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE COMMISSION CONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES PROJECT AUTHORIZED C OMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTFI. MONTH ENDED E XPENDITU RES TO -DATE AGAINST DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 01(31/03 TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE cp 1-215 PROJECTS Preliminary Engrg/Enwiron. (R09008, 9018) 56,726,504 55,878,173 87 .4 % $5,704,897 97 1°4. SUBTOTAL 1-215 $6,726,504 55,878,173 87,4 % 50 55.704,897 97 .1% INTERCHANGE IMPROV. PROGRAM Yuma IC Landscaping (R09926.9946) 5440,000 5400.000 90.9% 50 $312,519 78.1% SUBTOTAL INTERCHANGE $440,000 5400,000 90.9% 50 5312,519 78,1% PROJECT & CONSTR. MGMT SERV. (Agree ment (02-31-081)) 52,138,641 52,027,483 94 ,8% $171,925 5969 .122 47.8% SUBTO TAL BECHTEL $2,138;641 $2,027,483 94.8% 5969,122 47,8% PROGRAM PLAN & SERVICES Torth/South Corridor study (R09936) 525. 000 $25 .000 100.0% 50 50 0.096 SUBTOTAL PROGRAM PLAN &SVGS- 525,000 $26;000 10010 °/u 50 $0 0 .0% PARK-N-RIDEtINCENT. PROGRAM (RO 9859) (2101-2117) (9813) (2146) (9917) 2126 52,323,177 $2,323,177 100 .0% 529,394 51.377,332 59.3% 2127,2138,2139 SUBTOTAL PARK -N -RIDE 52,323,177 52,323;177 100 .0% 529,394 $1,377,332 59,3% COMMUTER RAIL Studies/Enginee ring(Constructlon 519,654,407 518,654,070 94.9% 51,951.891 518 .268 ,970 97.9% (RO 9731,9832,9833.9956,2028) 2031,2027,2120 R02029,2128, 3800 - 3811,3813, 3814) Station/Site Acg1OP Costs/Maint. Costs (0000,2026,2056.4000-4007,4198,4199.4009.3812 513,900,329 513, 900,329 100.0% 5916.950 59 ,255,535 66.6 % SUBTOTAL C OMMUTER RAIL $33,554, 736 532,554,399 97,0% $2,868,841 527,524,505 84.5% TOTALS $214,444,046 5167,139,831 77.9% 58,022,569 5138,693,926 83,0% Page 2of3 • • • • RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY/LOCAL STREETS & ROARS PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY PROJECT EXPENDITURE FOR T OTAL OUTSTANDING % L OAN BALANCE P ROJECT APPROVED MONTH ENDED MEASURE "A" LOAN OUTSTANDING TO -DATE A GAINST DESCRIPTION COMMIT MENT 01/31/03 ADVANCES BALANCE COMMIT MENT APPROVED COMMIT. CITY OF CANYON LAKE Railroad Canyon Rd Improvem ents 51,600 .000 51,600,000 $655,718 50 41.0% SUBTOTAL CANYO N LAKE LOAN 51,600,000 $0 I 51,600,000 5655,71$ 0 41.0% CITY OF CORONA Smith, Maple & Lincoln Interchanges & (1) $5,212,623 $5,212,623 $2,837,526 50 54.4% Sto rm drainage structure SUBTOTAL CITY OF. CORONA $5#212,623 $0 55,212,623 52,837,526 50 : 54,4 % CITY OF PERRIS Local streets & road improvements 51,936,419 51.936,419 1 51,154,005 50 59 .6 % CITY OF SAN JACINTO ,,J ocal streets & road improvements n 51,324,500 51.324,500 5789,333 $0 59.6% ) CITY OF TEM ECULA Local streets & road Improvements 55,094,027 $5.094,027 53,035,776 50 59.6% CITY OF NORCO Yuma VC & Local streets and road Imprmts 52,139,067 52,139,067 51,274,773 50 59.6% CITY OF LAKE ELSINO RE Local streets & road Improvements 51,500,000 51,500.000 5732,171 50 48.8% CITY OF HEMET Lo cal streets & roads improvements 5730,000 5730,000 S0 50 0.0% TOTALS. $18,806,636 50 518,806,636 $9,747,13. ...' - . $Q 51.8% NOTE: (1) Loan against interchange improvement programs. All values are for total Project/Contract and not related to fiscal year budgets. Slalas as of 1J31fd13 Page 3 of 3 • AGENDA ITEM 7B • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending December 31, 2002. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law and Commission policy. The County's Investment Report for the month ending December 31, 2002 is also attached for review. Attachments: 1 ti Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2002 2) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ending December 31, 2002 281 fnvestrnen ortfolia R eport Period Ending December 3t 2002 OPERATING FUNDS • RATING PAR PURCHASE MATURITY YIELD 70 PURCHASE MARKET UNREALIZED MOO DYS/S&P/FITCH VALUE - DATE DATE MARKET PRICE VALUE GAIN (L OSS) City National Bank 113,299 A3/BBB+ Cash with Coun ty Treasurer 53,568,559 AAA-MR1/AAA/-S1IAAAV1+ Local Agency In vestment Fund 15,158„385 AAA/AAA Agency/Treasury Securities: FHLBCB 3,540,000 AAA/AAA 3,540,000 12/19102 12J19105 3.15 % 3,540.000 3,548,850 8,850 FHLBCB 215,000 AAA/AAA 215,000 12/23/02 12./23/05 3 .00% 215,000 217,083 2,083 M oney Market Mu tu al Funds - CNI Charter FOS 135,218 AAA/ AAA 135,218 12/01/02 12/31/02 1 .19% 135,218 135,218 0 Fe d Home Ln Ban ks Global No tes 3,916,843 AAA/AAA 3.845,000 09/06/01 04/15/03 4.16% 3.018,543 3,948,334 31 ,691 Fe d Home Ln Banks Dlscount Notes 1,951,200 AAA/AAA 2,000,000 06/14/99 07/19/03 6,29% 1,981,200 2,048,125 86,925 Sub -Total 78,608,305 9,735,218 FUNDS HELD IN TRUST Cash wan County - CO N Local Tra nsportation Fund 23,396,169 AAA-M R1/AAA/-81/AAAV1+ Sub -Total 23.396,169 INVESTMENT WITH CITIES City of Lake Elsinore Sub -Total Prinppal 763,581 COMMISSION BOND PROJECT FUND /DEBT RESERVE 763,581 Maturity Data % 11/01/04 6.0% Milestone Funds 9,661,632 AAA/AAA First American Treasury 44,229,129 AAAJAAA U.S. Treasury .Notes 15,926,000 AAAJAA.A First American Treasur y - Held in Trust 2,003. 911 AAA//AAA Sub -Total 71,850,672 TOTAL S174,518.726 9,768,061 9.897,511 SUMMARIZED INVESTMENT TYPE 129,550 Banks 113,299 Cash wilh C ounty 76,964,728 1 .AIF 15,158,385 Mutual Funds: First American Treasury -Trust 2,003,611 Chit Charter FOS 135,219 Milestone 9,691,832 Sub -T otal Mutual Funds 11,830,781 F ederal Agency Notes 9,5332,843 U.S. Tr easury Notes 60,155,129 Inv estment Agreements 783,581 TOTAL 3174,615,726 County of Riverside Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund Compliance Analysis and Investment Report December 31, 2002 Paul McDonnell - TreasurerlTax Collector Donald R. Kent - Assistant Treasurer Jon Christensen - Chief Deputy Treasurer Last speaking, has lowest numbers bad Below At bps) yield, present Treasurer's Commentary "Sugarplums or a Lump of Coal?" month we speculated about what the holiday season would leave in our Christmas stockings, a sugarplum or a lump of coal? Well, generally it appears we were left a 'sugarplum'. We have had much to worry about in 2002, but with all of the problems we have had the economy proved to be quite resilient. Inflation has yet to rear its ugly head (excluding the run up in your local home prices). Interest rates are at their level since Ike was President, thus allowing consumers to spend more of their hard earned money. This has helped keep unemployment lower than in past recessions. Coupled with no further terrorist attacks, and no wars too date (Iraq, North Korea) has made for a not so year. Now we can wait to see if we truly have a Happy New Year in 2003. are reported economic indicators of importance: Reported in December 50 Durable Goods Orders — for Dec 241h -1.4% actual vs. 0.8% survey Factory Orders — for Dec 4th 1.5% actual vs. 1.7% survey Gross Domestic Product (GDP) —for Dec 20th 3rd Quarter -f 4.0% actual vs. 4.0% survey Unemployment Rate — for Dec 6th 6.0% actual vs. 5.8% survey Consumer Confidence- Index —for Dec 31st 80.3% actual vs. 86.0% survey FOMC Rate decision — for Dec 10th Unchanged at 1.25% Next decision Due 01/29...1.25% actual vs. 1.25% survey month's end, the Fed Funds rate was left unchanged at 1.25% from 1.25%, with a neutral bias. The 2 -year T -Note was yielding 1.6% (down while the 30 -year T -Bond was yielding 478% (down 32 bp.). For December, the Pool yield had a decrease of 15 bps. In average monthly At this juncture, we will continue to stay the course and maintain a short-term outlook until attractive opportunities to lock in longer -term rates themselves. -7Y fL G �.1r..s.+..E. Paul McDonnell Treasurer -Tax Collector Month -End Book Value Month -End Market Value' Paper Gain or (Loss) Percent of Paper Gain or Loss Yield Based Upon Book Value" Weighted Average Maturity (Years) Effective Duration $ 2,290,497,288 $ 2,294,052,129 $ 3,554,841 0.15% 1.88% 0.52 0.40 Markel value does not include accrued interest Beginning in April. the reported yield will be based upon the monthly average to mare accurately reflect the portfolio's performance relative to the Benchmark. All figures have been re -stated to reflect this change in yield. PORTFOLIO STATISTICS DECEMBER NOVEMBER $ 1,800,393,928 $ 1,804,127,696 $ 3,733,768 0.21% 2.02% 0.62 0.28 OCTOBER $ 1,890,297,511 $ 1,895,923,144 $ 5,625,632 0.30% 2.06% 0.44 0.21 SEPTEMBER $ 1,992,987,128 $ 1,998,590,336 $ 5,603,208 0.28% 201% 0.36 0.23 AUGUST $ 2,080,403,747 $ 2,086,306,033 $ 5,902,286 0.28% 201% 0.32 0.23 JULY $ 2,133,341,180 $ 2,138,786,340 $ 5,445,161 0.25% 2.01% 0.27 0.22 THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATED: AAAIMRI BY MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICES AAA/V1+ BY FITCIH IBCA County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 4th Floor - Capital Markets Riverside, CA 92502-2205 www.countytreasurer.org (909) 958-33908 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund - Portfolio Characteristics December 31, 2002 Maturity Market Value 30 Days or Less l ,050,010,419.44 30 - 90 Days 398,321,394.45 90 Days - 1 Year 311,766,364.95 - 2 Years 494,988,950.00 2 - 3 Years 38,055,000.00 Over 3 Years 910,000-00 Total: S2,294,052,I28.84 Quality Market Value Federal Agency 1,553,343,647.82 AAA 300,000,000,00 A-1 and/or P -1 430,777,541.67 N1it 9,930,939.35 •' Total: 2,294,052,128.84 Sector Market Value Federal Agency 1,553,343,647.82 Cash Equiv. & MMF's 551,000,000.00 Commercial Paper 179,777,541.67 Certificates of Deposit 5,000,000.00 Local Agency Obligations 4.930.93935 Total: 2,294,052,128.84 • fndudes Repro •• CalLale,iJizad. Time Deposits & Local Agency Obligations U.S. Treasury Yield Curve December 2002 Yid d Champs 6.30% 0.20% LICe Sill te18611 o10% 0.00% 'ft.ZiiifCr.ME=517kVTIMMWMEZIVE?LZI1Z --Mf. An Aim MIMICIM-FINI MT EWiTh ISO B111 MI, ET .M.21. Fa NI -0206 -0.30% -0 40'6/'a 11•'v=72 OU ..as'a.Mal, t Egg • E717 MI 'L 1 � lc'i+ Leilirmai z '-, qt r Sfj 1 Vii! t7 ryiff is r 1az 1 s--. `! i -o50% oeagaMMI 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 15Y 20Y 30Y Yield Curve Data 11/30/02 12/31/02 Change 3 Month 1.21% 1.19% -0.02% 6 Month 1.27% L20% -0.07% 1 Year 1.52% 1.20% -0.32% 2 Year 2.05% 1.60% -0-45% 3 Year 2.55% 2.03% -0.52% 5 Year 3.26% 2.73% -0.53% 7 Year 3.90% 3.39% -0.51% 10 Year 4.20% 3.85% -0.35% 15Year 4.96% 4.65% -0.31% 20 Year 5.25% 4.96% -0.29% 30 Year 5.03% 4.7S% -0.25% 284 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund - Portfolio Holdings Report December 31, 2002 11110 t Para! Government Agency 313311.1/C 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 1 730 01102/03 9,990.075.00 98 969 0,3116.07500 - 1.793 0.00 0.01 313111VC 15.03,(00,09 FED FARM CREDIT DANK 1,730 01/02+03 15,000,000.00 100.000 55,000,000,00 1,730 0.00 001 31331LVH 25,000,000.00 FED FARM CMO17 847414 1.070 01/02/03 25,0005000.00 100,000 75009000.00 1.670 000 0.01 ,113312/17/ 25,000,000 00 FEO FARM LY7ELIT BANK 1.070 01,20210.3 25,000.000.00 100.000 5000,000.00 1,670 0.00 0.01 31331LVH 25,000.00000 FED FARM CREDIT DANK 1670 0162/83 25,005000.00 15.0000 25,000,03,3 1,670 0.00 001 31358000 50,009200 t>3 FEDERAL 647191Tr.3 ASSN 0000 01102/[13 49,964,444.44 99.929 40.984,444 44 1.299 0.00 0.01 31356844 40,000.00400 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 0.000 0110870%3 39.97060000 99327 39,975.600,00 - 1200 007 0.02 513588AK 5,000,00000 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 0.000 01/1003 4,905,000.00 98.100 4,906,000,00 2.340 0.04 0,03 3135@80[ 25.000.000.00 FNMA 013000F4T NOTES 0.000 01/1063 24,525,00000 99.100 24,525600.00 - 2345 0,04 063 31330060 50000,000.00 FEDERAL 14811_61 AIM CORD 0.000 0920,03 49,950055,56 99.900 49,950,05556 1241 0.07 008 91338.48E 25000,000.00 FEDERAL HM LN MTG CORP 0.000 01/29103 21,901,50000 99 846 24,501,500.00 - 1280 0.09 0,08 31545888 25,000,00000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 0.000 01.729/03 24,954,59000 99.2349 24,981 50000 1,260 0.09 910 3136880F 50.000,00000 FEDERAL NATLL4TG ASSN 0.30 01(107513 40.913.509.44 (9027 49.913,569.4 - 1299 0,09 000 41358060 50,000,.000.00 FEDERAL NAT. MTG ASSN 0000 01131/03 49,912.808.80 99.026 49,912,888.09 - 1300 0.09 0418 3135608G 50,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 0,000 01/31/90 49,012.006:89 99.026 49,01288680 - 1.300 0.09 0.00 31331LVK 5,000.000.00 FED F8890 E 8E01T BANK 0,400 020(303 5,1100,000.00 100.000 5,009000,00 - 1.800 0,50 009 33131LVE 10,000,000.00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 0:900 0210343 1000000900 190.000 10,00080010 - 1.730 0.10 0.00 3I331LVE 15.000,000.02 FED FARM CREDIT 077475 1.730 02/03/73 15,000,000,00 100.000 15,000.00000 1.730 0.10 005 31331 LVF. 25009.000.00 FED FORM CREDIT BANK 1.600 0210203 25.600,000.60 100.000 25,000.000.00 - 1600 0.10 0.05 /0397261 20,000,005.00 5411 IF MAE OISC7OUNT NOTE 5.000 02/04103 10,509,600.00 97.813 19.562,600.00 2,510 0.11 0.10 8030728. 30000000.00 5ALLIE MAE C45COUNT NOTE 0.000 02/04233 29471200,00 96.074 29,42220900 2.446 0.11 0..10 N3508EP 32,000,000.00 FHMA171SC0(JN1040755 0.000 026760 91,286400 00 97.770 31.206,40000 - 2.502 0.11 070 113580814 50.000,000,00 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 0.000 0211403 48.684,500.00 87.729 48.86450000 - 2652 0.03 0.12 11331LVM 40000,000,00 FEDERAL FAFBA CREDIT BANK 0.005 03/03/03 49000,000.00 100,000 40,000,000.00 - 1270 0.10 017 31 A589C1 25,000,00900 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 0000 0367/53 24,444,250.00 97.777 24,444,250.00 - 2455 0.19 0.18 31331LVJ 10,0007000 00 FED FARM CREDIT BANK 1.070 01/71/53 10,000,000.0 709.110 39011900 00 71000.00 1,67e 0,26 0.25 11731LVJ 15,000,000.00 FED FARM CREO1T BANK 7.070 97/11703 15,000091.00 100.110 15,018500 613 15,500.00 7.670 0.26 0.25 351360M770 25,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 0KS 290 04123/03 25,000,0(150(3 100.500 25,125,000.00 125,910.00 3900 0.32 0.31 313396ET 10,549090,00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORD CORP 01 0,000 04/24103 19,194352,00 99.804 15,062X2300 377,073.60 2.375 0.32 0.31 50330000 72,009000.13 555)51374 HI7ME LOA! 600740 CORP DI 0000 04115103 21 496,620.00 99590 21,909,000.00 411,18090 2.391 0.33 0.32 11331LVL 10,000,000,00 FED FARM CRELHT BANK 0.000 05/01103 10000,000,00 100.100 10.010.00000 1000090 1.550 0.34 0.31 1I331LVL 16,000,000.00 FED FARM CRF_DIT BANK 1.550 05911703 15,000,000. 00 109.100 15,015.000.00 15,000.00 1.550 0.34 0.33 3I33MNGL 10.000,000 00 FEDERAL NOME LN SKS 2.600 05121/03 19000,000.00 100.525 10.052.000.00 52,000.00 2600 940 0.39 Jl33MNGL 15,1100,30.00 FEDERAL HOME LN DKS 0,000 0512170.4 15,000,005.00 150.525 15,070.000.00 78.000,05 2.500 0.40 0.30 7133MPAX 23,000,00000 FEDER.AI. HOME LH 1395 2.405 077(7707 22,000,000.00 138.635 23,144,00500 144000.00 2.400 0.50 0.52 3133MPAY 30000000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN &C5 2.490 07/87/01 30.000,00751..3 100.030 39789,000.00 169,800,0 2.400 0.50 052 3133MP17 50,050.009.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 815 2240 07775/33 50,000.000..50 100,500 50250,000.00 250,000.00 2.240 0,58 0.54 Illi133MS7[9 1(,03,000.00 FEDERAL 14[760230EMS 2000 17774703 90000800.3 100.100 100700,000.00 10,000.00 7,009 0.57 0.87 1136ac.v 10,03.30.00 FEDERALHCIME W &CS 2,005 11/14709 19000,00009 700.000 10,010,005.00 70,000.00 2000 5.57 0.87 130440119 100110326.50 FFDEiW. HOME 2/71 Eats 7.000 11/14/43 10,000,000,00 500.13 10010.00000 10,03,00 230 0.57 0,87 31336037170 I1],000;000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 6755 2.020 11/1461 10,091,050 00 13.040 192040300 4,03.00 2020 0.57 0.87 3133MTA5 20,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS 2.000 1121/53 20.000.050,00 100340 20.040,000,00 48,00909 2.001 0.55 Ogg 3133M07H 0,550,00000 FEDERAL HOME LN PKS 2540 01730/04 8,550,400,00 100.190 8,558,550,00 6,550.3 2.540 0,70 7.08 313596040 5,000,00080 FEDERAL NAT. 6050 ASSN 2.300 02/12/04 5,001,562,50 100-710 5035.500 (10 3,937.50 2,379 5,82 112 3105514WW 10.000,000170 FEDERAL NAIL MYG Assn 2,100 02/12/00 10,000,00000 180.110 10,011,00000 11,000.00 2.300 0,82 1.12 21336820 70000000,00 FEDEWIL 11060E LN 9755 2.280 50/17/00 19000,00000 100,260 10.026,00000 26,00921 2..2617 0,97 117 /159360229 30.000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IJ48KS 2290 54/79704 30,000.000.00 100270 30.091.00080 51,00000 2.200 1,12 127 31338150P 20800000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN13145 2.110 0413494 20,000,000,33 113,135 20.025,000.00 25,000.00 2.110 1.10 1.33 313360TA6 25,000.000.00 6ED8RAL HOME LN 1389 2160 05720724 75,000,000,00 100140 25,035,000.00 35,00,00 2,350 1.24 1.39 31336036075 5,950,50000 FEDERAL HOME LN 8755 230 0664/04 5,000.00000 100.125 5,036,250.00 6,25900 2000 12B 1.43 3133Mi6475 29.00080020 FEDERAL HOME LN 9756 2000 06/0464 20.050000 00 100.125 20,025,000,00 26.000.00 7.000 1.21 1.43 313361023 30,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN 8758 1.900 0911746 .30000.000.00 700.270 30,081,000 00 81,000.00 1.906 1.31 1,46 3153IUCS 35,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LNBKS 7.060 00/23/724 25,000.200.00 100370 25,092,53,00 92,50.00 2.060 1-31 1,41 3133085/0 26800.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LAI BKS 2.500 10729/04 26,900,000.00 100135 26.032.50000 32,50009 2.500 1.23 1,83 ) 133MSAC 27,000,000.30 FEDERAL HOME L0I BIOS 2,500 11075704 27,000,00000 100420 27,113,40500 113,400.00 7.53 1.28 1,66 9133MT89 22,000,005.00 FEOFIULL HOME LN 81[5 2.045 11719004 22,000,000.00 100.215 22.046,290.00 48200,00 2645 1.29 1,99 31336FTMX 30,000,000.3 FEDERAL NOME LN BKS 7.350 11723/04 30,050000.00 100.430 39,125,000.00 120000.00 2350 1.30 7.90 0128709/9 20.000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 60772 CORP 2.600 11/25704 25,03,000.00 100.100 20070000.00 38,00.00 2.500 1.31 1.91 1733617MS 35009,000:00 FEDERAL HOME W EMS 2400 11(28104 35,000800.00 100:170 35,0.59,500,00 50,500,00 2.400 1.31 1.91 Iv 9354147 30,000,000 05 FEDERAL HOME LN 8KS 2250 12/1344 30,000,000.00 105390 30,117000m 717000.00 2250 1.35 1,95 3/3314094 30,500,000.010 FEDERAL HOME 114 MS 2500 1271704 30807,09100 100610 30,183,000.05 183.00000 9.590 1.36 1.96 3133MUF4 30,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME W BK5 2520 1211744 30,000,00000 1000580 30,174,00080 174,00000 2-520 1.36 1.06 3133MUKR 5,000,000,00 FEDERAL Hoo94 LN 8755 2305 72127/04 5,000,000.3 10629.1 5814,65000 74,050 A0 2.385 1.33 1.99 31136051134 50,00000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SCS 2.305 12/27/01 50,000,500.00 100.201 50,140,509,00 140,500.00 7.385 1.30 1,99 373892190 6,00083.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MFG CORD 3,250 1170765 683.00000 101.565 6.034,609.00 940100,00 3.250 2.25 2.85 3108F2RC 14,000800.00 FEDERAL NOME W MT CORP 3.350 1170765 14,000,000.00 101,585 14,221200.00 221,200.170 3.250 2.25 2135 2-133MTA2 15.000 00(990 FEDERAL HOME 174 57(5 3500 1171465 15.000 000.00 15.2011 15,529.00000 39 00000 3.53 2.21 L75L 6014-70041 1,555.190,000.00 1,549,788,096.72 1,553.343.847 52 3,554$11.10 2.040 0.58 0.74 A6quisilhn current Current Market [041000 Maturity Cool Value We Accr tnt G4nfLoss Y10 Mal1 EIr. Our..' Ave, L1re' Cash Equivalent & Morley Market Funds 92852085 1,005,000.00 A761 GOVT 8 AGENCY PORI-FOLK; 8000 01/01/03 1000,000,3 100.000 1.000.00000 - 1.325 0.00 0.00 25903.000,00 MERRJLL LYNCH 8 CO INC 0000 01102,03 250,000.000.00 160.03 750000,000,50 - 1230 0.00 009 266,000.03.06 600HGAN STANLEY DEAN 5.00 51,03/03 300.000.000,597, 10093 904 000,000 0q. - 1.330 653 pi 5/0-10'-' 551800000.00 551000.000 00 551.060,000 00 1.255 0.00 0-91 • 285 Continued [In ITwrro Pape 1 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund - Portfolio Holdings Report December 31, 2002 A9gU4sillpn Cement Currant . Market ' CUS1F P2r(t1 is{Yor Coupon MalUdIM COsi Price Value wro Asyr Ink Gain/Lone Y55 Mal' EUL Dun_' Ave- 1.456 Collateralized Time Deposits 5,000,090.00 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 0.000 04114103 5.000.000.00 500,000 5,000000.90 - 2038 qj9 Sub-Tniai 5000.000.00 5,000,00020 5.000.000..00 2.020 029 0.20 Commercial Paper 3027X195 50,000,000.90 EXXON PROJ 98iVMTCOR 11000 010603 49,997,561.15 99,975 49,90'7301.11 1.300 9.01 002 369fi6MHM 50,000,000.00 CE14£RALELCTRIC CO 0000 811211.03 49,906,763.89 99.814 49,900.763.$6 1.373 0,00 0.06 90202ONN 30,093.90000 U05 FINANCE 0EL481ARE 0609 01(2303 29,967,750.00 99.093 9,957,750.00 - 1291 0,05 096 1667TML5 50,000,000.00 CHEVRON USA 0,000 01(21113 49,915,686.67 99.831 49,915,466.67 1,322 0.00 0.08 5u6 -Triad 190,000,000.00 Average weighted days 104 commercial paper = 19.9 179,777541.67 179,777,541.37 - 139 5.05 0.05 Local Agency Obligations' VAULT 1,32093995 EGA 0100 0.970 O8r.M003. 1,320,939.35 100.000 1,3'10,939.'.15 - 2.300 051 0.50 VAULT 2,700,800.00 MARCH JPRA GAM 2300 0501105 4700,000.00 100.000 7,700,000,00 - 2.300 1.6 2 5A2 VAULT _ 910,50020 U.S. DISTRICT COURT- Pry CTF 2.300 0611520 910,000,90 1041.000 910,000110 - 2.lin0 L,e9 17.47 Sub -Top' 4,530,039,35 4,930,93335 4,930,931535 2.300 2.14 4,69 0nnd-Tetafs 2,295120,839.35 2,790,497,287.74 2.294,052,130 ai 3,'554,841,10 1.003 0040 0_62 The market naive and yield of short -ern away nunret 5acur0kn are based a0 pt.4,asn pica. £ifecaxe Owatiern !s a ei3ptiletientadcalbutaiien 9Wt reemesiiii pone someway, %ewe !akng Mid car 2,a08ion ax Knelt. Ayafage life h Pe manber0lyeara until principal is oeNsred ✓N malurNy, Weigbled by market clue, I Lineal Agm y OE/Vatican have variable rate enupo,o , Spread le Ole Pool eA lied being mailed Wore maturity_ 286 • raga 2 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND TREASURER'S POLICY • The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is governed by both State Law and County Policy. The County Treasurers Statement of Investment Policy is more restrictive than the California Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. As of this month end, the County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in compliance with this more restrictive policy. Although we have been diligent in the prepartion of this report, we have relied upon numerous pricing and analytical sources including Bloomberg Market Database and Capital Management Sciences, Inc. Bond LOrlistiX LLC 213.612.2200 SUMMARY OF AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Califamea Government Code County Investment Polley Cal. Govt. Investment Category Maximum Authorized % Quality Maximum Authorized % Coda Malud Limit S&P/Moodvs Maturity Limit Actual quality Riverside Sl£P/Moad1s/Fitch Portfolio % 53601(a) LOCAL AGY BONDS 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 15% / $150mm 1 A/A2IA 0.000% 53601(b) U. S. TREASURY 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 5 YEARS 100% N/A 0.00% 53601(d) CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY DEBT 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 2.5% Investment Grade 0.21% 53601(e) FEDERAL AGENCIES 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 5 YEARS 100% N/A 67.714E 53601(0 BILLS OF EXCHANGE 270 DAYS 4041" 180 DAYS 304E At/P1IF1 0.00% 53601(g) COMM. PAPER 2T0 DAYS 401% At/P1 270 DAYS 40% At/Pt/F1 7.84% 53601(h) CERTIFICATE & TIME DEPOSITS 5YEARS 30% - 1 YEAR 25%rnax Al/Pi/F1 0.00% 53601(1) REPOS 1 YEAR NO LIMIT 45 DAYS 40%/25% term max Al/Pi/F1 10.94% 53601(i) REVERSE REPOS 92 DAYS 20% _ 60 !DAYS 10% max N/A 0.009E 536016) MED. TERM NOTES 5 YEARS 30% A 2 YEARS 209E max AA/Aa2IAA 0.00% 53601(k) MUTUAL FUNDS 90 DAYS2 20% AARIAaa' IMMEDIATE 20% AAA by 2 of 3 Rating Agencies 13.06% 53601(m) SECURED DEPOSITS (BANK DEPOSITS) 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 1 YEAR 2% max 0.22% 53601(n) MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH SECURITY 5YEARS 23% AA -SECURITY A - ISSUER NIA NIA 0.0096 18429 (1,2,3) LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS N/A NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 0% max 0,00% ' No more than 30% of this category may be invested wart any one commercial bank s 100.00% Mutual Funds ma ly may baInterpret ed 35 weighted average malurty not exceeding 90 days. 3 Or must have an lnveslmertAdvisor wllb nol less than 5 years expecience and with assets under management dl9r500,000,000. 287 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund December 31, 2002 PROJECTION OF FUTURE CASH FLOW The Pooled Investment Fund cash Clow requirements are based upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. The Treasurer states that based upon projected cash receipts and maturing investments there are sufficient fluids to meet future cash flaw disbursement requirements over the next 12 months. MONTH MONTHLY MONTHLY REQUIRED ACTUAL INV. AVAIL. TO RECEIPTS DISBMNTS DIFFERENCE MAT. INVEST BALANCE MATURITIES INVEST>I YR. 01/03 172.7 01/2003 416.2 699.2 -283.0 1103 0.0 02/2003 450.0 551.6 -101.6 101.6 0.0 03/2003 513.6 427.9 85.7 0.0 85.7 04/2003 878.4 554.2 324.2 0.0 409.9 05/2003 401.4 714.9 -313.5 0.0 96.4 06/2003 395.7 671.8 -276.1 179.7 0.0 07/2003 426.3 442.1 -15.8 15.8 0.0 08/2003 408.4 511.3 -102.9 102.9 0.0 09/2003 353.8 499.0 -145.2 145.2 0.0 10/2003 472.7 579.9 -107.2 107.2 0.0 11/2003 450.0 488.4 -38.4 38.4 0.0 12/2003 994.4 601.0 393.4 0.0 393.4 Totals: 6,160.9 6741.3 -580.4 801.10 34.98% 1199.7 184.1 64.4 95.6 35.0 1.3 103.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 1743.1 1488.9 76.12% 65.02% 24 Month Gross Yield Trends The yield history represents gross yields; administrative costs have not been deducted. Actual earnings on fund balances will he credited by the Auditor - Controller based upon County Treasurer calculations, Portfolio yield generally lags current trends in short-term interest rates_ Yields fluctuate with changing rnarkets and past performance is not an indication of future results. Gross Yield Trends 7.00 6.50 6.00 5.50 - - . 5.00 4.50 - 4,00 3.50 _ 3.00 - - 2.50 -- 2.00 1.50 1 F 1 l i t II I I I I I Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jury- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec - 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 , 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 -is- PORTFOLIO MEW -it-ALL TAXABLE AVERAGE 24 Month Yield Spread (Pool Yield vs. All Taxable Average) 0.50 - 0.40- - -- 0.30- _ - 0.20 - 0.10 - 0.00 -0.16 -0.20 -0.30 -- - - -,j Average Spread - 0.12% 1 - - -0.40 - -- -0.50 " Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec - 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 " The Money Fund Report"/ All Taxable Average Is compiled and reported by iMoneyNet, Inc. (formerly IBC Financial Data, Inc.) iMoneyNet, Inc. is a leading provider of independent analyses and information to the financial services industry, with a particular area of focus in money market mutual funds. The All -Taxable Index tracks the yield of aver 500 taxable money market funds across several categories, i.e. Treasury. Government, and Prime, and reports the average yield of those funds ill monthly basis. For more information on the iMoneyNet, Inc. Index secwww.ibcdata.comlindex.html 288 Investment Portfolio Information For RIVERSIDE CO UNTY TRANSP ORT ATION COMM. Portfolio # 74760100 prECEMED JAN 14,2002 1\3 CO Cfl CO NTENTS 1. Account Summary 2. Detail of Sec urities Held 3, Fair Market Values & Analytics 4. Security Transactions & Interest 5. Cash Transactions 6. Current Month Gains & Losses 7. Cash/MoneyFund Balances For The Month Ending D ecember 31, 2002 TRANSPORTATIONE IVAN M. CHAND, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM. P.Q. BOX 12008 RIVERSIDE CA 92502-2208 PFM * One Keystone Plaza * North Front & Market Streets, Suite 300 * Harrisbu rg, PA 17101-2044 * (717)232-2723 For more information, please contact your client manager:NANCY JONES (415)982-5544 JONESN@publiefin.com 1 Detail of Securities Held: (Ex cluding Cash/MoneyF und) P FM 74760100 RIV ERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORT!TION COMM. MONTH EN DED: December 31, 200 SECURITY TYPE DESCRIPTION S &P MATURITY PURCH ASE ORI GINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET CUSIP RATING PAR C OUPON DATE DATE C OST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE FED AGY BOND/NOTE FHLMC GLOBA L REFERENCE NOTES 3134 A2 KZ0 AAA 2,000,000 5.750 07/15/03 06/14/99 1,961,200.00 6.29 53,027.78 1,994,327 .82 2,048,125 .0 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 3133M5QB9 AAA 3,845,000 5.125 09/15/03 09/06/01 3,916,643.15 4.16 58,022 .12 3,870,614.89 3,948,334.3 TOTAL SECUR ITIES N 03 0 5,845,000 5,877,843.15 4,87 111,049.90 5,864,942.71 5,996,45 9,3 55,845,000 55,877,843,15 4.87% 5111,049.90 55,864,942 .71 55,996,459.3: • Security Transactions & I nterest: MO NTH ENDED: TRA DE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SE CURITY DESCRIPTION No transactions d uring the month. TOTAL SECURITY TRA NSA CTIONS N co S&P M ATURITY PRINCIPA L ACCRUED CUSIP R ATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL Realized Gains and Losses: MONTH E NDED; TRA DE SETTL DATE DA TE TRAN TYPE S ALE METHOD SECU RITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES (0 fV No tra nsactions duri ng the month. CUSIP PRINCIPAL RE ALIZED REALIZE]] PAR VALUE COUPON PR OCEEDS G!(L) COST GI(L) BOO K • • • • • • N aYure cti It estrticsnt C]ther 1 qua [Operating Funds 4544 _ tlonn i= rnjr.,ct 761 Trust Funds 16% 6�t f4etarve 24 % LAIF E4.7. Portion. Irtverstrruant Type. Feddtal Agency fg.t.ss 64 Mutual Fkun 744. Invostrnent Aig raernvntu 35% Statement of Compliance All of the above investments and any investment decisions made for the quarter ending December 31, 2002 were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy as adopted on April 11, 2001. The Commission has adequate cash flows for six months of operations. Signed by Chief Financial Officer 293 • AGENDA ITEM 7C • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: City of Canyon Lake Loan BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to grant the City of Canyon Lake an advance of Measure "A" - Local Streets and Roads Funds. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 9, 2002, the City of Canyon Lake (City) submitted a request for an advance to make repairs and improvements to Railroad Canyon Road. This advance is to provide maintenance as the road is beginning to show signs of deterioration. Due to the small amount, staff has prepared the loan agreement to advance the funds to the City from current reserves. The advance of $ 300,000 will be repaid after the City has repaid its prior loan. During that period that the City is paying for their prior loan, the City will pay the Commission interest only, Staff has negotiated with the City, a 4.5% percent interest rate on the advance. Staff will withhold the advance payment prior to the remittance of the local streets and roads funds to the City. Staff is also requesting a budget adjustment. The budget adjustment will provide sufficient expenditure authority to make the advance to the City. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $300,000 Source of Funds: Western County Highway Reserves Budget Adjustment: Y GLA No.: 227-71-86104 Fiscal Procedures Approved: L__ + Date: 02113103 Attachments: 1) City of Canyon Lake Loan Agreement and Loan Amortization Schedule 2) Letter from City of Canyon Lake 294 • • • CITY OF CANYON LAKE xecutive Director Eric Maley Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 658599 DECE11VIEn MAY 15 20D2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION We appreciated your recent visit to Canyon Lake to discuss the Measure A Extension proposal language with our RCTC representative Bill Trembly and myself We are pleased to tell you that as a result of your explanation and further discussions with the Council, the City has taken a position of being in full support of placing the Measure A extension on the ballot. At the time of your visit we also briefly discussed the 1993 Measure A loan to the City which enabled the City to fund the full improvements on Railroad Canyon. Road and bring the two lane roadway up to a fully developed 4 lane arterial street during the mid - 90's. 1 had asked for a financial review of our amortization schedule at that time to see how the cash flows from Measure A were affecting our overall payment schedule. Ivan Chand, your Chief Financial Officer was kind enough to send me a follow up letter on March 19th, indicating that in reviewing this he had also discovered that our loan amortization had been incorrectly stated and we were to receive a reduction in our loan balance of $244,375. Frank Kessler Mayor John Zaitz Mayor Pro Tem John Grardinelli Council Member Alfred W. Trembly Council Member Jack Wamsley Council Member Mr. Chand's letter also indicated that our loan would be completely paid by FY 2006- 2007 and then the City would be entitled to additional Measure A Funds until the end of the program in fiscal year 2008. Recently we received an estimated amortization schedule from RCTC as part of the request for an updated five-year improvement plan. This schedule shows that the City will be entitled to approximately $1,184,000 during the period fiscal year 2002-2003 through 2006-2007. After subtracting our current balance due on our loan of $895,000, this would leave approximately a $290;000 to $300,000 due the City in the latter couple of years in Measure A's life I also had our own accounting firm run some extrapolations on Measure A out to the end of the program and their figures show the same balance of approximately $290,000 to $300,000 coming to the City. 295 31516 Railroad Canyon Road, Canyon Lake, CA 92557 • 9091244-2955 • FAX 9091746-2022 - EMAIL: cnyntake(pe.net I would appreciate a meeting with yourself and your finance officer, Mr. Chand in the near future to discuss the possibility of an advancement of these funds at some time sooner than the 2006-2007 years. Perhaps this advancement could take the form of an extension of our current loan, leaving the cash flow as is or some other form of advance loan agreement. As 1 mentioned to you during our meeting, Railroad Canyon Road was improved during the mid -90's and is beginning to show signs of deferred maintenance i.e., major patch repairs, overlays, etc. Unfortunately the City, having pledged most of its gas tax resources as long term debt to construct the road, does not have sufficient funds available to conduct the maintenance program that is needed to protect the major investment in the roadway. If there is someway we could receive our remaining Measure A funding in advance, we could apply this to an aggressive maintenance program which would keep the road in good condition until the Measure A extension and Proposition 42 funds become available. We will contact your office in the near future and see if we can arrange a meeting schedule. We appreciate your continued support as always in working with these issues. Sincerely, /C1,1-e-ipz Del Powers City Manager • • • 296 - -- Gen er al i nputs - Loan Amount 300,00{ - interest rate 4..750°% RCTC PV rate 5.000% LOAN CALCULATOR RE SU LTS Date Principal interest Total Payment Present Value ii Total in terest $48,687,506 211/2003 $0.00[ `,. 1 °,39t °�'' r'. 'i _li5r'.. [-x4 "' = t� s. � T € �► 4 t ?: ' R+ Total Principal $308,000.00 3/1/2003 51,187.50 $1,187 .50 51,182 .57* Tota l Payments $348,687,50 4/1/2003 $1,187.50 51,187 .50 $1,177,67 PV of Total Payments $297,648.92 5/1/2003 $1,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,172.78 6/1/2003 $1,187.50 51,187,50 51,167.911' 7/1/2003 $1,187.50 51,187.50 $1,163.07 8/1/2003 $1,187 .50 5i,187.50 51,158.241 9/1/2003 51,187 .50 51,187.50 $1,153 .43; 10/1/2003 51,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,148.65 11/1/2003 $1,187.50' $1,187.50 $1,143.88 12/1/2003 51,187.501 $1,187,50 $1,139.14 1/1/2004 51,187.50 $1,187,50 $1,134.41 2/1/2004 51,187 .50 $1,187.50 $1,129.70 3/1/2004 51,187.50 $1,187 .50 51,125 .01" 4/1/2004 $1,187.50 51,187.50 $1,120.35 5/1/2004 51,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,115 .70 6/1/2004 51,187,50 51,187.50 51,111.07 ti . -.% 17c 7/1/2004 $1,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,106.46 8/1/2004 51,187.50 51,187.50 51,101.87' J 9/1/2004 51,187.50 51,187.50 $1,097.30 f 1L2 [ r RI , -' «-, , .,,' • ,�, '�,.+ 1 P .. .9 9 S1i i 10/1/2004 $1,187.50 51,187,50 51,092 .74 11/1/2004 51,187 .50 51,187.50 51,088.21 -- 12/1/2004 _ 51,187.50 51,187.50 51,083.69 1/1/2005 51,1187.50 $1,187.50 51,079.20��: - 211/2005 51,187.50 $1,187 .50 51,074.72 3/1/2005 51,187,50 $1,187.50 $1,070,26 4/1/2005 51,187,50 51,187 <50 $1,065 .82 5/1/2005 51,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,061.39 8/1/2005 51,187.50 51,187,50' $1,056.991 711/2005 51,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,052 .60 8/1/2005 $1,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,048.24 9/1/2005 51,187.50 51,187.50 $1,043.89 10/1/2005 $1,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,039.56 1 11/1/2005- $1,187,5(] $1,187 .50 .g `l $i,035.z4 12/1/2005 $1,187.50 51,187.50 $1,030.95 1/1/2006 00• 3/112006 51,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,187.50 $1,187 .50 $1,026.67,:�, $1,187.50 51,187.50 $1, 022.4 1, 51,018,17 d 4/1/2006 $1,187.50 51,187.50 51,013 .94�Ql 5/1/2006 51,187. 50 51,187.50 51 ,009.73 _ 6/1/2006 51,187. 50 51,187.5£} $1,005 .55�1` . 7/1/2006 $300,000.00 51,187.50 5301,187. 50 $253,979 .76 Total 3300,000. 00 $48,887. 50 5348,687.50 5297,648.92 - • Page 1 of 1 Amortization Table for 5306000.00 borrowed on Jul 28, 2006 Month Year 8 2006 9 2906 10 2006 11 2006 12 2006 1 2007 2 2007 3 2007 4 2007 5 2007 6 2007 7 2007 Payment (5) 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 Principal Paid (5) 8528.04 8561.79 8595.68 8629.71 8663.87 8698.16 6732.59 8767.16 6801.06 8836.70 8871.68 ' 8906.80 Interest Paid (5) 1187.50 1153.74 1119.85 1085.83 1051.67 1017.37 982.94 948.38 913.67 878.83 843.86 808.74 Total Interest (S) 1187.50 2341.24 3461.10 4546.92 5598.59 6615.97 7598.91 0547.29 9460.96 10339.80 11183.65 11992.39 Balance (5) 291471.96 282910.17 274314.49 265684.78 257020.91 2483222.75 239590.15 23082299 222021.13 213184.43 204312.75 195405.95 Month Year 8 2007 . 9 2007 10 2007 11 2007 12 2007 1 2008 2 2000 3 2008 4 2008 5 2008 6 2008 7 2008 Payment (5) 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 Principal Paid (5) 8942.06 8977.45 9012.99 9048.66 9084.48 9120.44 9156.54 9192.79 9229.17 9265.71 9302.38 9339.21 Interest Paid (5) 773.48 738.09 702.55 666.87 631.06 595.10 559.00 522.75 486.36 449.83 413.15 376.33 Total Interest (5) 12765.87 13503.96 14206.51 14873.36 15504.44 16099.54 16658.53 17181.28 17667.65 18117.48 18530.63 18906.96 Balance (5) 186463.89 177486.44 168473A5 159424.79 150340.31 141219.87 132063.33 122870.54 113641.37 104375.66 95073.28 85734.07 Month Year 8 2008 9 2008 10 2008 11 2008 12 2008 1 2009 2 2009 3 2009 4 2009 Payment (S) 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9715,54 Principal Paid (5) 9376,17 9413.29 9450.55 9487.96 9525.51 9563.22 9601.0'7 9639.08 9677.23 Interest Paid (5) 339.36 302.25 264.99 227.58 190.02 152.32 114.46 76.46 38.31 Total Interest (5) 19246.32 19540.50 19813.56 20041.14 20231.17 20383.49 20497.95 20574.41 20612.72 Balance (51 76357.90 66944.61 57494.07 48006.11 38480.60 28917.38 19316.31 .1. 9677.23 - 0.00 • • 298 http://www.bankrate.comlbrm/mortgage-calculator. asp?unroundedPayment =9715.53 693 ... 12/12/2002 • • • Agreement No. 03-19-053 AGREEMENT FOR ADVANCE OF MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FUNDS 1. Parties and Date. This Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , 2003, by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") and the City of Canyon Lake ("City") located in the County of Riverside, State of California: 2. Recitals. 2.1 RCTC is a county transportation commission created and existing pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Sections 130053 and 130053.5. 2.2 The City is a municipality with local streets and roads requiring maintenance, development and rehabilitation. 2.3 RCTC has enacted and the voters of Riverside County ("County") have approved Measure "A" which authorizes RCTC to impose a retail transaction and use tax of one-half percent (.5%) throughout the County of Riverside for up to twenty years. This tax is popularly known as a 'A cent sales tax. 2.4 The Transportation Improvement Plan ("Plan") implementing Measure "A" provides that such funds are to be used for transportation purposes in the County and further provides that forty percent (40%) of Measure "A" funds are to be distributed to the cities in the Western County area for local street and road improvements ("Local Streets and Roads Funding") in amounts based on both proportionate population and contribution to Measure "A" revenue. 2.5 The proceeds of the retail transaction and use tax ("Measure "A" Funds") are collected by the California Board of Equalization pursuant to a contract between RCTC and the Board of Equalization, and paid to RCTC monthly. 2.6 The City has requested and RCTC has agreed that RCTC will advance to the City certain amounts which the City and RCTC anticipate RCTC would otherwise collect and allocate to the City as its share of Local Streets and Roads Funding, as allocated pursuant to the formula set forth in the Plan. 2.7 The funds shall be used to finance a portion of the cost of improvements to the streets more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto ("Project"). 2.8 The City agrees that it will repay to RCTC the advance and costs associated therewith described herein from Local Streets and Roads Funding. R VPLI1B1WIPV545601 299 3. Terms. 3.1 Advance of Measure "A" Funds. A. Amount of Advance. RCTC hereby agrees to make the Advance to the City on or before February 1, 2003 (the "Funding Date"), on the terms and conditions set forth herein, in the principal amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) (the "Advance"). B. Interest. The Advance shall accrue interest payable by the City at a rate of 4.75% per annum. C. Repayment of Advance. The City shall repay the Advance to RCTC as set forth hereunder in monthly installments no later than on the first day of each calendar month, according to the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "B". The repayment schedule for the Advance has been established so that City shall only be required to make interest payments on the Advance from the Funding Date until July 1, 2006. From August 1, 2006 the repayment schedule will require City to make principal and interest payments on the Advance so that the Advance is repaid prior to April 1, 2009. D. Payment of Interest. Interest shall be paid by the City to RCTC at the interest rate specified in Section 3.1(B) above in arrears on the unpaid portion of the Advance as specified in Section 3.1(C) above. E. Prepayment. Because the Advance is, or may be, made with the proceeds oftax exempt debt, prepayment of the Advance may be made by the City only with RCTC's prior written consent. 3.2 Repayment. A. Authorization to Apply Local Streets and Roads Funding to Payments; Pledge of Additional Security. For so long as any obligation of the City under this Agreement remains outstanding, the City hereby instructs RCTC to apply the City's portion of any Local Streets and Roads Funding which would otherwise be distributed to the City under Measure "A" to pay any due but unpaid obligations of the City to RCTC under this Agreement. RCTC in its sole discretion may require the pledge of additional security if Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Funding is insufficient to meet the repayment schedule established by RCTC under Section 3.1(C), above. B. Application of Local. Share. RCTC shall calculate the Local Streets and Roads Funding which would otherwise be allocated to the City under Measure "A" within thirty (30) days of receipt by RCTC of such funds from the Board of Equalization, and shall apply such amount against any amounts due from the City and not yet paid to RCTC under this Agreement. C. Remaining Balance Payable. RCTC shall notify the City of the calculation and application of funds made under Section 3,2(B) above, and any amounts then due to RCTC from the City, within thirty (30) days of RCTC's calculation and application of such RVPUB#WJP15456Q 1 • 300 • • • amounts. RCTC's calculations shall be final, absent clerical or mathematical error. The City shall pay to RCTC any balance due within fifteen (15) days of receipt of such notice from RCTC of such amount. 3.3 Conditions of the Advance. The obligation of RCTC to make the Advance shall be subject to the condition precedent that RCTC shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to RCTC, all of the following: A. Duly executed copies of this Agreement and such other documents as RCTC may request in order to fully effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. B. The written opinion ofthe General Counsel of the City, addressed to RCTC, that this Agreement and the other documents contemplated herein have been duly authorized and do not require the further consent or approval of any body, board or commission or other authority; are the valid, binding and legally enforceable obligations of the City in accordance with their respective terms; are not in contravention of or conflict with any law or regulation; will not conflict with any other agreements ofthe City, nor constitute an event of default on any obligations ofthe City to RCTC, on any existing public debt issuance ofthe City, or under any other agreements of the City; and the Project identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is a qualified use of Local Streets and Roads Funding under Measure "A." C. Such documents and certificates regarding the existence, authority and power ofthe City to execute this Agreement and any related documents as RCTC deems reasonably necessary. 3.4 City's Representations and Warranties. The City hereby makes the following representations and warranties which shall be deemed to be continuing representations and warranties so long as the Advances remains outstanding: A. Agreement Authorized. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and any and all related documents (collectively „Advance Documents") are duly authorized and do not require the further consent or approval of any body, board or commission or other authority. B. No Default. The City is not in default, nor is it aware of any events that, with the passage of time or the giving of notice, would constitute an event of default on any obligation of the City to RCTC or on any existing public debt issuance of the City. C_ No Conflict. The execution, delivery and performance ofthe Advance Documents does not contravene or conflict with any constitutional provision, law, statute, regulation, or any agrcetnent, indenture or undertaking to which the City is a party or by which it or the Measure "A" Funds may be bound or affected, and does not and will not cause any lien, charge or other encumbrance to be created or imposed upon the Measure "A" Funds by reason thereof For purposes of this Agreement, City represents that it is a party to that certain "Agreement Between Riverside County Transportation Commission and City of Canyon Lake for Advance of Measure "A" RVPUB\WJP\64S6O -3- 301 Funds to be Used for Transportation Improvements", dated January 13, 1993 ("1993 Agreement"). Pursuant to the 1993 Agreement, City obtained an advance of $1,600,000 from RCTC against City's Measure "A" allocation for specific transportation improvements, further reference being had therein. As of the date of this Agreement, City owes approximately $895,000 to RCTC under the 1993 Agreement. In order to finance both the Advance and the repayment of funds advanced under the 1993 Agreement, the parties intend for City to repay only interest on the Advance until July, 2006 as provided in Section 3.1(C) above, at which time it is anticipated by the parties that City will fully repay its obligations under the 1993 Agreement. The parties intend that this financing mechanism will eliminate any potential conflict between City's obligations under both this Agreement and the 1993 Agreement. D. Solvency. The City is solvent. E. No Violation of ROTC Measure "A" Advance Policies. The City is not in violation of the policies of RCTC for recipients of Measure "A" funds, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B." F. Litigation. There is no litigation or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting the City and relating to the Advance, or the Advance Documents, or the transactions contemplated herein or thereby. G. Financial Condition. All financial statements and data submitted in writing by the City to RCTC in connection with the request for Advance are true and correct, and said statements truly represent the financial condition of the City as of the date thereof and the results of the operations of the City for the period covered thereby and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles on a basis consistently maintained, and that since such date there have been no materially adverse changes in the ordinary course of business. The City has no knowledge of any liabilities, contingent or otherwise, at such date not reflected in said statements, and the City has not entered into any special commitments or substantial contracts which are not reflected in said statements other than in the ordinary and normal course of business, which may have a materially adverse effect upon its financial condition or operations as now conducted. 3.5 City's Affirmative Covenants_ The City agrees that so long as the Advance is outstanding, it will, unless RCTC shall otherwise consent in writing: A_ Use of Advance. Use the Advance only for purpose and Project identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. In addition, the City recognizes that under Measure "A" the purpose of Local Streets and Roads Funding is to assist with the maintenance, development, and rehabilitation of the existing the City and County road system in Western Riverside County, and the City agrees that the Advance shall only be used in a manner consistent with the portions of Measure "A" related to Western County Local Streets and Road Funding. B. Tax Covenants. Comply with all applicable restrictions and requirements of Internal Revenue Code §§ 103 and 141 through 150, as amended, including any R Jii\WW \6 01 -4- • • • 302 • • • written instructions from RCTC arising from requirements or covenants contained in any nonarbitrage certificate relating to any RCTC Bonds. C. Records and Reports. Maintain a standard and modem system of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles on a basis consistently maintained and furnish RCTC bi-annual audited financial statements and such other information relating to the affairs of the City or the uses of the Advance as RCTC reasonably may request from time to time. D. Inspection. Permit, at any reasonable time, upon reasonable notice, qualified personnel designated by RCTC in writing, to inspect any projects funded by the Advance and any records maintained in connection therewith. RCTC shall have no duty to make any such inspection and shall not incur any liability or obligation by reason of making or not making any such inspection. E. Notice of Default. Promptly notify RCTC in writing ofthe occurrence of any Event of Default hereunder or of any event which would become an Event of Default hereunder upon giving of notice, lapse of time, or both. 3.6 City's Negative Covenants. The City will not, so long as the Advance remains outstanding, without RCTC's prior written consent create, incur, assume or permit to exist any mortgage, deed of trust, security interest (whether possessory or nonpossessory) or other lien upon or on the City's Local Share of Measure "A" Funds other than liens in favor of RCTC. 3.7 Rights and Remedies. A. RCTC shall at all times have the rights and remedies of a secured party under the California Commercial Code ("Code") in addition to the rights and remedies provided herein or in any other agreement or document executed by the City. B. The rights and remedies of RCTC under this Agreement shall not be exhausted by the exercise of any of the rights or remedies of RCTC pursuant to this Agreement or any other agreement between the City and RCTC or any action, proceeding or any number of successive actions or proceedings, unless and until all of the sums owing RCTC by the City shall be fully paid, performed and discharged. All rights and remedies afforded to RCTC pursuant hereto or under any other agreement at any time in effect between the City and RCTC (whether or not there are other parties in addition to the City and RCTC) shall be separate and cumulative and in addition to any and all rights or remedies available at law, in equity or otherwise, and no one of such rights or remedies, whether exercised or not, shall be deemed to be in exclusion of any other right or remedy available and shall in no way limit or prejudice any other right or remedy. The exercise of any one of such rights or remedies shall not be deemed a waiver of, or an election not to exercise, any other right or remedy. RVPUBI W IPIb456D 1 -5- 303 18 Events of Default. The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall, at RCTC's option, constitute an event of default (each an "Event of Default") and the City shall provide RCTC with immediate notice thereof. A. Any warranty, representation, statement, report or certificate made or delivered to RCTC by the City or any of the City's officers, employees or agents now or hereafter is incorrect, false, untrue or misleading in any material respect; or B. The City shall fail to pay, perform or comply with, or otherwise shall breach, any obligation, warranty, term or condition in this Agreement, any agreement delivered pur- suant hereto or any other agreement whether now or hereafter existing between the City and RCTC; or C. There shall occur any of the following: dissolution, termination of existence or insolvency of the City; the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency law by or against the City; entry of a court order which enjoins, restrains or in any way prevents the City from paying any sums owed by the City to RCTC. 3.9 Further Assurances. The parties shall at all times hereafter execute, acknowledge, deliver, and perform all financing statements, documents and acts and further assurances as are reasonably necessary to fulfill their obligations hereunder and to effect the transactions contemplated herein. 3.10 Indemnification. The City shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend RCTC from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses, including interest, penalties, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, incurred or suffered, which arise, result from, or relate to its breach of or failure to perform any of its agreements, covenants, obligations, representations, or warranties contained herein. Such indemnity shall survive the termination or discharge of this Agreement. 3.11 Use of Advance. The City shall use the Advance only for the purpose of offsetting the City's costs incurred for the Project. 3.12 Miscellaneous. A No Waiver_ No waiver of any Event of Default or breach by the City hereunder shall be implied from any omission by RCTC to take action on account of such Event of Default of breach, and no express waiver shall affect any default other than the default specified in the waiver and the waiver shall be operative only for the time and to the extent therein stated. Waivers of a breach or any covenant, term, or condition contained herein shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same covenant, term or condition. The consent or approval by RCTC to or of any act by the City requiring further consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the consent or approval to or of any subsequent similar act. k VP[If31 WJFVi4560 2 _6_ • 304 • • • 13 No Third Parties Benefitted. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of ROTC and the City and no third person, other than a permitted assignee or successor hereunder, shall have any right of action under this Agreement. C. Notices. All notices or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be considered as properly given if mailed by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by express courier delivery or personal delivery to the addressee. Notice mailed by U.S. mail shall be effective only if and when received at the addressee's address. For purposes of notice, the addresses of the parties shall be as follows: RCTC: CITY: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, California 92501 Attn: Executive Director CITY OF CANYON LAKE 31516 Railroad Canyon Road Canyon Lake, CA 92587 Attn: City Manager Each party shall have the right to change its address for notice hereunder to any other location by the giving of notice to the other party in the manner set forth above. D. Applicable Law. This Agreement and all documents provided for herein shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of California. E. Time. Time is of the essence in this Agreement, and each and every provision hereof in which time is an element. F. Amendment and Waiver. This Agreement and each provision hereof may be amended, changed, waived, discharged or terminated only by an instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto. G Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any action arising out of this Agreement shall be entitled to its actual attorney's fees and other related expenses actually incurred. H Severability. The invalidity and unenforceability of any one or more provisions of this Agreement will in no way affect any other provision. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instruunent. f{VNU i1WJP\645601 -7- 305 J. Headings. The various headings used in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement or any provision hereof. K Further Assurances. At any time or from time to time upon the request of ROTC, the City will execute and deliver such further documents and do other acts and things as RCTC may reasonably request in order to effect fully the purposes of this Agreement, and any other Advance Documents and to provide for the payment of the Advances and interest thereon in accordance with the terms of this Agreement_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITY OF CANYON LAKE By: By: Ron Roberts, Chair Mayor REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: Eric Haley, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP, Counsel Riverside County Transportation Commission R VPUBIW ]P16455Q I -8- City Clerk • 306 Exhibit List Exhibit A Description of Project Exhibit B Repayment Schedule Exhibit C Commission Policies RVPUBIWIP 645601 -9- 307 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT CITY OF CANYON LAKE MEASURE "A" LOAN PROJECT: The Project consists of making repairs, improvements and expansions to major local streets and roads within the City of Canyon Lake. RVPUB\WJP 64S6DI [INSERT SPECIFICS HERE] 308 • • • • RVPUBIWJPl64560i EXHIBIT "B" REPAYMENT SCHEDULE [See attached] 309 General I Loan Amount +0,000 Interest rate 4,750% PV rate 5.000% • RESULTS Total Interest 548,687,50 Tota l PrIncip;V 5300,000.00 Total Paymen ts 3348,687,50 PV of Total Payments 3297,648.92 RCTC [LOAN CALCULATOR f Date 2J112 03 3/1/2003 4/1/2003 5/1/2003 6/1/2003 7/1/2003 8/1/2003 9/112003 10/1/2003 3/1/2004 4/1/2004 5/1/2004 6/1/2004 7/1/2004 8/1/2004 9/1/2004 10/1 /2004 11 /1/2004 51,187.50 12/1/2004 31,167,50 Princlpal Interest Total Payme nt Present Valrte .",. ^ Y S, 50 00'� �, t l'i t 187.50 31,187 .50 51,182 57 +1'.Ifr'�' ti 1 31,187.50 31,187,50 51,177.671;1 51,187,50 31,187 .50 31,172.781T 1, 51,187 .50 $1,187 .50 51,167 .91 1{ Et'1�34'L 31,187 ,50 51,187,50 31,163,074 51,187,50 51,187.50 31,158.24[[ ii` 1,187.50 31,187.50 31.153,4ifo 51,187.50 51,187.50 31,187 ,50 51,187, 50 31,187.50 51,187,50 31,187 .50 51,187,50 $1,148.65 51.143,88 FT i 51,139,14 rap t1 1,134.41 51,187.50 51,187,50 31,129.70 31,187.50 51,187,50 51,125.011 51,187,50 51,187.50 $1,120.35 1,187 .50 $1 ,187.50 1,187,50 51,187.50 51,115 .70j; 51,111.07 31,106 .46 51,101.$7;; 51,187.50 51,187,50 187,50 31,187 .50 31,157.50 31,167.50 31 187.50 51,187.50 1/1/2005 2/1/2005 3/1/2005 4/1/2005 5/1/2005 6/1/2005 7/1/2005 8/1/2005 9/1/2005 10/1/2005 11/1/2005 12/1/2005 1/1/2006 2/1/2006 3/1 /2006 4)1/2006 5)1/2006' 6/1/2005 7/1/2006 Total 51,187,50 1,187.50 51,187.50 51,187.50 51,187.50 51,187.50 $1,187,50 51,187.50 31187,50 51,187,50 P! 1,097.30 1,092 .74 51,187.50 $1,088 .2 31,187,50 31,063 .69 51,187 .50 51,079,20;1:,; 51,187 .50 51,074.72 9:. 51,187.50 $1,070.264. . ,187.50 51,065.82.1 51,081 ,39 51.055.99 $1,052.600;, 51 048,24 1,187.. 31,187 .50 31,187.50 31,187.50 5300,000 00,000.00 1,187.50 51,187,50 51,187.50 51,187.50 51,187, 50 51,167. 50 31,187. 50 51,187.50 31,187. 50 31,187.50 1,187,50 51,187,50 51,187.50 1,187.50 '8 i f+lij" 51,043 89 31,039,56 31,035.24 ;1.1 51;030 ,95 026 .67', 'r 51.022, 4 548,687 50 31,187.50 31,157.50 31,187.50 31,187,50 ,187.50 1.018.17,c!, 31,013 .941., 51,009,73't, 51,005.55 Gil 5301,187.50 5253,979.76 5348,687,504 5297,648.92 .r, • Page 1 of 1 Month Year Payment (9) 8 9 2006 2006 971554 Principal Paid {S} 8528 04, lnletest Paid (SI 1187.50 Arnarlization Tat>'fe 10 11 106 7006 5100009. o ban -Dyed on ,M 28.2006 1? 1 2 22906 2007 2007 3 2007 9715,54 9715.54 9715 54 971551 9715.54 9715 54 9715.54 5561.79 1153.74 8.595.68 8629.71 8653.87 869516 8732.59 1119.55 1085.53 1051.67 To tat Interest (5) 118750 234124 13afance($) 291471.96 282910.17 Month Ytar 8 9 2007 2007 Payment (5) 9115.54 Principal Paid (j) 8942.96 Interest Paid (5) 773 48 9715.54 8977.45 738.09 1017.37 952.94 3461.10 4546.92 5598.59 6615.97 1598.91 274314.49 265684.78 10 I 15 007 2007 9715.54 9715.54 901299 9048.66 702.55 666 57 5767.16 948.38 4 2007 9715.54 8801.86 913.67 5 6 7 2007 2007 2007 9715.54 971554 9715.54 883610 5871 878.53 843.86 5906.50 808.14 257020.91 24832275 239590.15 12 1 2 2007 2008 2008, 8547.29 9460.96 10339.80 11183.65 1199'-39 230822.99 222071.13 21318443 204312.75 19440595 3 4 2008 2008 5 6 2008 2008 7 2038 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9084.48 J 912044 9156.54 631.06 Tote Interest. (9) 12765 57 11593.96 14206 51 14873.18 15504.44 1 'Balance (9) Month Year Payment (5) Principal Paid (5) Interest Paid (5) 186463.R9 177486.44 8 9 2008 2008 9715.54 9715.54 595.10 559.00 9715.54 9715.54 9192.79 522.75 9715 54 9715.54 4 9229.17 9265.71 9302 38 486.36 449 83 413.15 9715.54 j 933921 376.33 54 168473.45 159424 79 150340.31 141219.81 10 2008 9715. 9376.17 9413;9 9450.55 339.36 30225 264 99 Tote /Merest (5) 1924E 32 19548.59 0al'ance {S} 76357 90 66944.61 19513.56 57494.07 11 12 2008 2008 9715.54 971554 9487.96 9525 51 227.58 100.02 20041.14 20231.17 2009 16658.53 17181.25 132063.33 122670.54 2 3 2009 2009 17667.65 113641 37 18117 48 104375.66 18530.63 18906.95 9507325 85734.07 2009 9115.54 9563.22 152.32 20.383.49 9715.54 9715.54 9715.54 9601.07 9639.08 114.46 76.46 9677.23 38.31 20497.95 20574.41 20612.72 48006.11 ' 38480.60 28917.38 19316.31 9677.23 0.00 • • 311 Ilttp:/r11`r,\`1.t hankrate.ci1511`bt-i11r171COi01ci,?-C:1!Ctih(nr • • • RVPUBIWJP16456D1 EXHIBIT "C" COMMISSION POLICIES [see attached] 312 GUIDELINES FOR MEASURE A RECIPIENTS PINANCING PROGRAM • With the successful passage in November 1992 of Measure AA the Commission's bonding limitation was increased from $300 million to $525 million. One of the reasons voters were asked to increase the limit was to allow the Commission to serve as the vehicle for local jurisdictions to bond against their Measure A streets and roads revenue stream. To that end, staff has developed policies which will guide the Commission when providing bond revenues for local jurisdictions. • • All jurisdictions which receive Measure A local streets and roads monies are eligible to apply for the program. It is the Commission's intent that a number of requests frorn local jurisdictions will be combined into one debt issue. This will prove to be more efficient for the Commission to administer and probably more advantageous to the borrower(i.e.., lower rate of interest). The intent of this is clearly to maximize economies of scale. To accomplish this, local jurisdictions are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time, once notified of timing and scheduling for the bond issuance, prior to start of project so that delays will not occur as a result of the Commission's need to process all requests. Any jurisdiction either not willing or unable to participate in the combined issuance but still desiring to bond through the Commission, may be subjected to higher administrative fees, issuance costs and interest rates. Any jurisdiction wishing to access this program must meet the following criteria: Section 1. Credit Criteria 1.1 All currently. issued general obligation debt must be rated investment grade by Moody's and Standard & Poors. Any jurisdiction which has not issued public debt should be in financial condition such that if debt were issued it would be rated investment grade. The Commission encourages all non rated jurisdictions to obtain a shadow rating from Moody's and/or Standard & Poors.(See provision 2.4) 1.2 The jurisdiction (1) has not commenced a voluntary case under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similiar law now or hereafter in effect,(2) admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, (3) is the subject of a decree or order for relief entered by a court of competent jurisdiction in an involuntary case under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similiar law now or hereafter in effect, (4) has not made an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or (5) has not consented to the appointment of a receiver of itself. 313 1.3 The jurisdiction must not be in violation of any Measure A policies as established by the Commission for recipients of Measure A funds. 1.4 The jurisdiction may not be in default on any other obligations to the Commission or on any general obligation debt, certificates of participation, or debt supported by special revenues. This is not meant to include financings such as assessment district, redevelopment, or housing bonds. Section 2. Terms and Conditions 2.1 Duration of the loan will be determined by the Commission at its sole discretion. In no event will any term be longer than June 1, 2009. 2.2 Interest rate will be the best rate the Commission can obtain in the market which will be the true interest cost (TIC) for the bond issuance. 2.3 Debt will be issued on a basis subordinate to the Commission's senior debt. 2.4 A debt coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1 based on the lower of the last two year's revenues will be required, unless the jurisdiction is not rated investment grade and chooses not to obtain a shadow rating, then the coverage ratio requirement will be 2 to 1. 2.5 The Commission will withhold payment from Measure A streets and roads allocations on a monthly basis. Any month in which a jurisdiction's revenues do not meet the payment obligation, the jurisdiction will be required to remit the difference within 15 days of notice from the Commission. Failure to make timely payment may result in project funds being withheld. In the event project funds are exhausted, a pledge of additional revenues may be required. 2.6 If it is deemed to be feasible and warranted, and subject to bond counsel review, jurisdictions may capitalize interest during the construction period(up to a maximum of two years. 2.7 Prepayment of the obligation will be subject to the terms and conditions of the bond documents, approval of bond counsel, and shall be at no cost to other jurisdictions or the Commission. 2..8 Borrowed funds must be used for eligible projects as set forth in the agreement between the Commission and the jurisdiction. Eligible projects may include construction, repair, and maintenance of streets and roads. The Commission along with its bond counsel will determine if the projects meet this criteria. 314 • • • • • • 2.9 A debt reserve fund may be required and each jurisdiction's proceeds from the bond sale will be reduced by its proportionate share of the reserve fund. In the event of early payment by a borrower(if approved by the Commission), debt reserve fund amounts may not be released if deemed not advisable by the Commission after consultation with its financial advisors, municipal bond insurers(it insurance is obtained), the rating agencies, and bond counsel. 2.10 Jurisdictions shall be required to enter into one or more agreements including a loan agreement with the Commission upon such terms and conditions required by the Commission. Section 3. General Provisions 3.1 Though it is not the desire of the Commission to be involved in the administration of the project, review by the Commission's bond counsel will be necessary to ensure that any project will not jeopardize the tax exempt status of the bonds issued. This review will be ongoing in the event jurisdictions later substitute other projects. Agency agreements may be executed with each jurisdiction that will clearly define roles and responsibilities. 3.2 An application tee for RCTC administrative costs may be charged to all jurisdictions desiring to participate in the issue. Ongoing administrative costs will be periodically billed to all participants. All costs of issuance including but not limited to accounting, financial, legal, and bank fees, will be proportionately shared among the participants(i.e., approved applicants) and shall be at no cost to RCTC. Any jurisdiction, which subsequent to application approval elects not to participate will be fully responsible tor their proportionate share of costs incurred to the point of withdrawal. 3.3 Incremental costs incurred as a result of an action or lack thereof by any jurisdiction will be charged to that jurisdiction and not be borne by the pool_ 3.4 Market timing, structure of the issue, selection of trustee, bond counsel, underwriters, and financial advisors will be at the sole discretion of the Commission. 3.5 Proceeds from bond sales will be held by a trustee. The Commission will process all requests for release of funds and forward to the trustee on behalf of the jurisdiction. 3.6 Federal tax law generally requires that the pool participants be identified at the time of issuance of the bonds. The pool participants must be available to work with bond counsel with regard to the legal considerations, including the federal tax law requirements. Tax law 315 1 requirements will continue after the loans are made and the pool participants will have ongoing compliance responsibilities in connection with which tax covenants and certificates will be obtained from each participant. Coordination of each participant's needs and timing of those needs will be essential in order to determine the availability of exceptions to the arbitrage rebate requirement_ 3.7 The Commission reserves the right to approve exceptions to these policy guidelines on a case by case basis, to discontinue the program at any time, or to add or revise conditions or requirements. 316 • AGENDA ITEM 7D • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Federal Funding Obligation Balances BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Con-nmission to: 1 j Approve moving unexpended CMAQ Funds to the State Route 60 HOV Project from the East Interstate 215 Junction to Redlands Boulevard; and, 2) Receive and file a report on the status of federal funding obligation balances. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Caltrans has embarked on an effort to review the status of projects that have been obligated but have not been expended. This is an effort to reduce the amount of obligational authority that Caltrans continues to carryover every budget year. There is also a push to urge lead agencies to follow through with closing out projects. With the State's budget meltdown, this is likely an attempt to find funds that will not be used and thus assists in filling the budget gap. Caltrans distributed a list that identified projects that were obligated but funds were not expended. They indicated that funds not expended by June 30, 2003, will not be carried over into next year's budget unless agencies requested the funds be re -appropriated to FY 2003-04. Agencies have the option to deobligate projects provided that they reprogram the funds by June 30, 2003. In Riverside County, many of these projects were closed out and the lead agencies have submitted the required paperwork. Two RCTC CMAQ projects were obligated but have not been expended; the CMP Deficiency Plan and San Jacinto Branchline Rail Crossing Project. The 2001 CMP Update identified a segment that was at level of service "E". Therefore, staff anticipated a deficiency plan would need to be prepared. The rail crossing project was completed under a separate federal obligation and therefore we need to de -obligate these funds. In order to maintain these funds for this fiscal year, staff is proposing moving unexpended funds to the SR 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Project from the East I-215 Junction to Redlands Boulevard. • • • 318 • AGENDA ITEM 7E • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: City of Perris Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Substitution Request BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the City of Perris request to substitute the State Route 74 and Redlands Signal Project with a "Round About" Project at the same location and transfer the unobligated CMAQ Funds from the signal project to the round about project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The RCTC substitution policy requires all project changes/modifications to project scopes and/or funding to be presented to the Commission for approval. In 1999, the RCTC board approved the State Route 74/Redlands Signal Project for Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ} Funding in the amount of $234,000. Over the past years, the City of Perris has been working with Caltrans on this project. Caltrans had concerns about the functionality of the intersection with the installation of a signal. Caltrans determined that the signal would not work and has taken the lead to design a "Round About", like those that exist in England and many other countries. The City has agreed to the round about project and is requesting that the $195,493 of unobligated CMAQ Funds be applied to this project. The total cost of the project is $750,000 with Caltrans funding the balance. The Technical Advisory Committee reviewed this request and supported it unanimously. 319 • AGENDA ITEM 7F • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Local Transportation Funds Allocation for Local Streets and Roads for the Palo Verde Valley Apportionment Area BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to allocate the FY 2002-03 Local Transportation Funds for Local Streets and Roads purposes in the Palo Verde Valley Apportionment Area. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The estimated FY 2002-03 apportionment of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for the Palo Verde Valley Area is $792,908. In addition, $98,985 in unallocated funds were carried -over from FY 2001-02, increasing the total funds available to the area to $891,893. The Commission approved the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) Short Range Transit Plan on June 10, 2002, allocating $325,611 to PVVTA. Therefore, a balance of $566,282 is available for local streets and roads purposes in the Palo Verde Valley Area. The Palo Verde Valley Apportionment Area is the only area in the County in which LTF Funds are still allocated for streets and roads purposes. The attached table shows the allocations for the City of Blythe and the County of Riverside based upon a formula previously approved by the Commission. Population figures are from the State Department of Finance E-5 report dated January 1, 2002 for FY 2002-03, and have been adjusted to credit the prison population (3,600) at Chuckawala to the County. Attachment: Allocation of LTF Funds for Local Streets and Roads Schedule 320 • ALLOCATION OF LTF FUNDS FOR STREETS AND ROADS PALO VERDE VALLEY AREA FY 2002-03 AVAILABLE TOTAL LESS FOR STREETS AGENCY POPULATION PERCENTAGE SHARE PVVTA AND ROADS Blythe 17,622 64.88% $578,680 $162,806 $415,874 Riverside Co. 9538 35.12% $313,213 $162,805 $150,408 TOTAL 27,160 100.©% $891,893 $325,611 $566,282 NOTE: Population for City of Blythe excludes prison population of 3,600 for Chuckawala as of 1/1102, which is included in County population. Prison population obtained from State Dept. of Finance, Demographics Division. Approved by RCTC: JR: 02/13/03 • 321 • AGENDA ITEM 7G • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Prograrn Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendments to Fiscal Year 2003 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the Cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore, and Palm Desert BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the amendments to the FY 2003 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the Cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore, and Palm Desert, as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive their Measure "A" disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. The Measure "A" Plans for the Cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore, and Palm Desert were approved by the Commission at its July 10, 2002 meeting. Any revisions to the adopted plan must be returned to the Commission for approval. The following revisions are being requested: a) The City of Corona has submitted a revised plan to increase funding to the Magnolia/I-15 Interchange Improvement Project and decreasing funding to the Lincoln Avenue Traffic Congestion Relief and Major Pavement Rehabilitation Projects for FY 2003. b) The City of Lake Elsinore has submitted a revised plan to add one project, Greenwald Avenue Rehabilitation project, to their FY 2003 Five -Year Plan. 322 c) The City of Palm Desert has submitted a revised plan for FY 2003 to increase funding to the Fred Waring Widening Project and delete the Indian Springs Mobile Home Park Project. Attachments: 1) City of Corona Revised FY 2003 Measure "A" Plan 2) City of Lake Elsinore Revised FY 2003 Measure "A" Plan 3) City of Palm Desert Revised FY 2003 Measure "A" Plan • • • 323 • OFFICE OF: (909) 736-2480 (909) 736-2496 (FAX) -fohnt©ci.coronla.ca.us January 31, 2003 �r CSC H�IC FEB 0 6 2003 TY TRANSPORTATION J DEN COMMISSION RKS DEPARTM E N PW-0004-03 0E 3156 815 WEST SIXTH STREET, P.Q. BOX 940, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92878-0940 CORONA CITY HALL - ONLINE, ALL THE TIME httpJMwww.discovercoronacorn) Mr. Eric Haley Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Haley: Attached is a request for revision of the City of Corona's FY 2002/03 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan budget. Requested is a budget change of $650,000, to be realigned from the Lincoln Avenue Traffic Congestion Relief, continuing appropriations project, and $1 million from. Major Pavement Rehabilitation to the Magnolia /1-15 Interchange Improvement project. The realignment is required to fund design and project management of the Magnolia/l-15 Interchange Improvement project. The City is able to backfill the Lincoln Avenue Traffic Congestion Relief project with Developer Impact Fee funds that are specifically for Street and Traffic Signals capital projects. Additionally, when the FY 2002/03 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan budget was submitted to RCTC, the SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian or Caltrans Bicycle Transportation Account Program money was not included. The City is tracking these grants to other City obtained grants and has included this in the "New Appropriations Total Cost" column for transportation/pedestrian related projects, as shown on the attachment. We will use Gas Tax and/or Measure A funding as the local match commitment. We have added them accordingly. If you have any questions, please contact Reza Zoighadr, Sr. Civil Engineer at (909) 736-2441, or Barbara Thierjung, Budget Manager at (909) 736-2314. HN N LICATA, P: E. Public Works Director„ JNUKB/irt Enclosures 324 • Agency: Prepared By: Phone No ,: Date: City of Corona Reta Z olghadr (909) 739.2441 X800 Revistonr December 18, 2002 • RIVERSID E COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSI ON MEASURE "A " LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002/03 - 20061'07 Page 1 of 5 Fiscal Year 2002 .2003 ITEM NO. 1 Rev 2 3 4 Rev 5 6 Rev 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PROJECT NAME I LxMITS Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets - AB 2928 Title o nly • Pavement Rehabilitation f or Local Streets Bedford Canyo n Realignment Third Street Improvement and ROW Acquisiti ons Majo r Pav ement Rehabilitation - inc AB 438 A rterial Widening Magnolia!! -15 Interchange Improvements Citywide GIS Application Freeway Bridges/Smith Aven ue Storm Drain Harrison Street Widening Joy Street Railroad Crossing Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Green River Ro ad Widening City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) No. M ain St, Rehab Modifications at SR 91 - CMAQ FY 99/00 Chase Drive Bikeways - SB 821 FY 01/02 Bus Stop Accessibility - SB 821 FY 02/03 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Accessibility - SB 821 FY 01/02 - Bicycle Facilities Raiiroad1Parkridge - BTA CMAQ do SB 821 Represents Grant Dollar Po rtion Only that is in Fund 227 Local Tran sportation Fun d • under Total Cost Column PROJ EC T (Category) TYPE Roads, Bridges and . Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Fr eeways R oads, Bridges and Freeways Building , Systems, and Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Operational Budget Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways FY 201)2.2003 NEW APPROPRIATIO NS TOT AL COST $ 641,536 600,000 200,000 1,166,784 Total Revised Total $ Estimated Measure A Entitlements: * May included use of prior Fund Balance 466,784 150,000 500; 1,500,000 7,816 532,648 100,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 116,216 165,862 64,125 116,600 I01,600 177,480 MEASURE A ENTITLEMENTS Est. FY 2402-2003 446-57000 $ 5.390,667 641,536 100,000 200,000 576,784 150,000 50008 1,076,784 7,816 532,648 100,000 100,000 150,000 60,000 116,216 3,235,000 3,075,000 # Remaining $ • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATJON COM MISSIO N MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUN DS PROGRAM CURRENT YEAR 2001/02 Agency; City of Carona darepee ed By: Rez a 2adghadr Phon e No. ; (999) 739.2441 Dote, Au 14, 2002 Revision: December 18, 2002 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME /LIMITS PROJECT (Category) TYPE FY 3001101 APPROPRIATIO NS TOTAL COST HXP6Wf1TURES CM 5132/02 ENC UMRRANCSS C7 D 5/31/02 CONT1N176 •D APPROPRIATIONS FOR FY 2002/02 1 M agnolia Ave Railroad Grossing Roads. Bridges and Fteewaya S 171,884 5 8,370 5 - 5 163,514 2 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Roads, Bridges and Freeways 553,223 10.581 12,219 530.423 3 Resurfacing and Pavement M aintenance Roads. Bridges and Freeways 82,406 20,916 . 61.490 4 Miscellane ous Street Drainage System Drai nage 313,940 1.90,494 113.823 9,623 5 Yuma Avenue Interchange Roads, Bridges and Freeways 52,808 52,80'7 • 1 6 Bedfor d Canyon Realignment Roads. Badges and Freeways 50.000 23,3114 • 26,696 7 Lincoln Avenue Traffic Congestion Relief Roads, Bridges and Freeways 1,337,608 12.115 128,668 1,176.826 8 Pavement Rehabilitation for Loam Sne ers Roads, Bridges and Freeways 876,641 780,216 23,188 73,238 9 Rimpau/Magnolia Intersection Upgrade Signals and Lighting 93,000 - - 95,000 10 Ternescal Canyon Road Realignment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 25,000 - 25,000 11 Third Street Improvements and RO W Acquisitions Roads, Bridges and Freeways 227,569 21,534 • 196,014 12 M ajo r Pavement Rehabilitation Roads. Bridges and Freeways 1,068.516 429,981 102,465 -m ac r 69 13 A rterial Widening Roads, Badges and Freeways 274,105 137.109 - 136,996 14 Po mona Road Pavement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 599 • - 399 15 M agnolia/1•13 Interchange Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 200 .307 22.313 15.549 161,""5 lb Cityw ide GIS Application Buildin g, Systems, an d Facilities 75,335 13,64-4 - 61,691 17 M ajor Storm Drain My ra D rainage 10.000 14,088 I8 M aste r Drainage Line 7A Drainage 60,000 60.000 • - 19 Pomona Road Storm Drain Drainage 2.630 - 2,629 1 20 Freeway Bridges/Smith Avenue Storm Drain Roads, Bridget and Freeways 532,648 * Loan paid during yearend activities . 532.648 21 Striping Rehabilitatio n Roads, Bridges and Freeways 50,253 43,396 6,859 22 Root Pruning, Sidewalk, Curb en d Gutter Replacement Ro ads, Bridges and Free ways 41,239 9,929 - 31,310 23 HOV Ram ps - Serfas Club Roads. Bridges and Freeways 158,285 940 3.986 113,359 24 Chase D rive Improvements Ro ads, Bridges and Freeways 8,240 ' 1,209 • 1,031 25 HOV Ramps - Lincoln Roads. Bridges and Freeways 96.856 • 4,641 92,215 26 110 V Ramps - McKinley Roads, Bridges and Freew ays 123,468 1 3.986 12ir48>• - 27 hio. M ain Si Rehabilitation M odifications at SR 9I Ro ads, Bridges and Freeways 2,153,537 358, 644 1 ,504,981 2.89,912 28 Main Street Ste ms Corridor Roads, Bridges and Fre eways 621,488 615,638 - 5,650 29 Local Street Widening/Curbs/Gutters Roads, Bridges and Freeways 111,839 5,613 25,555 80,671 30 Overlook Sw eet Roads. Badges and Freeways - 14,889 - - 44,889 - Fiscal Year 2001 .2002 • • Reduced by 5650K S 546,826 Reduced by 534,138 -► S 501,93I Increased by 5650K 5 812,445 increased by 534,138 S 324,050 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATIO N COMMISSION MEASURE 'A "LOCAL FUNDSFRO GRAM CURRENT YEAR 2001102 Agency City ofCuron u Prepared By: Rez a 241g/a& Pho ne N o, (909) 739-X441 Dale: Ja me 14, 2002 Revision: December 28, 2 ITEM NO. 31 32 33 34 5 36 37 PR OJECT NAME /1111, TS Comp Traffic imp Ned Program I-15 Freeway Rumps M odification Advanced Traffic M anagement System Cwt / Gutter 1 Sidewalk Replacement M ein Stre et La ndscape at SR 91 Chase Street 'improvements Cos[ Allocation (O verhead) FY 1001102 APPROPRIATIONS PROJECT (Catego j TYPE T OTAL COST Signals and Lighting Roads, Bridges and Freeways Signals and Lighting Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges a nd Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Operational Budget 25.200 145,257 230,000 65,397 489,569 85,926 711886 EXPENDITU RES LTD 5131/02 55,786 47,811 65,029 11,423 3,675 70.896 ENCUMBRANCES CT D3i3II11S 89,471 4,441 10.430 19.000 Flsasl Year 2001.3003 CONTINUED APPRO PRIATIONS FOR FY 2002193 25,200. 227,748 368 466,816 64,251 Total $ 10,554 .650 S 3,093,583 S 2,065,033 $ 5,406,033 Profectr that acre show n "rtrlked oar" arelmay bein g redirected in the next fiscai ye ar's capital pr otects . L oss re -directed projects (424,175) Total estimat ed to ca rry forward $ 4,981,859 J January 24, 2003 /7 Q{2n Efiii2OTE 063033 O� ) E "o TDRmmE D[ EhE [R1t14/kd &adiC.LUJl2 •• Ms. Cathy Bechtel Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Measure "A" Project: Greenwald Avenue Paving Dear Ms. Bechtel: EC's JAN 29700 ONNIN On January 7, 2003 we sent you the attached letter requesting that the cost to pave this road be programed in Measure "A" Funds. Attached for you information is alive -year Measure "A" Local Funds Program for the City of Lake Elsinore_ Greenwald Avenue paving is project number 9 on our local funds program, budgeted for $145,000.00. Please contact me at (909) 674-3124 extension 242 should additional information or clarification of the attachments be needed. Sincerely, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Ray O'Donnell City Engineer C. Dick Watenpaugh-City Manager Bob Brady -Community Development Director Bob Boone -Administrative Services Director Dave Sapp -Community Services Director Attachments • 130 Spud Saran �SErEEE, LakE ELg-inal E, 67.741 +� 3 TJ (' 4%' 9 9 4 ��ir.7 '� 8-E� xDlZ c.= �9°4,� �7�¢-3724 �ax: (7 07) 674_2392 ly ZakE EflinOTE «cAl17YriE tfe cnmsrrui c�E€�.cl�itcm January 7, 2003 Ms. Cathy Bechtel Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Measure A Project: Crreenwald Avenue Paving Dear Ms, Bechtel: Riverside County Department of Transportation and the City of Lake Elsinore co- sponsored the paving of Greenwald Avenue. Project construction is complete. The City's share of the project is $145,000 of Measure A Funds, The City, hereby request that $145,000 to be programmed in Measure A Funds five year expenditure plan, Please contact me at (909) 674-3124 extension 242 should additional information or clarification of the attachments be needed. Sincerely, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE If W Ray O'Donnell City Engineer Attachment c. City Manager Community Development Director Administrative Services Director Community Services Director • • 130 (n JEZEEf, ak£ ErsinotE. C .ji 9253 2i JE/44.E_ (909 674-3724 Jax' (9©9} 674-2392 ITEM NO. 2 3 4 Eto Q 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 • Agency : City of Lake Elsinore Prepared by : Ray O'Donnell Phone No. : (909) 674-3124 x 242 Note A!1 figures in thousands ($000s) • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CO MMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003-2007 • Page of 2 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE 02103 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 03/04 TOTAL. MEAS. A COST FUNDS 04/05 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 05/06 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 06/07 TOTAL MEAS . A COST FUNDS TRANSFER TO GENERA L FUND MISCELLANEOUS STREET RESTORATION: VARIOUS LOCATIONS CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT VARIOUS LOCATIONS TRANSFER 80 80 80 80 100 100 80 80 80 80 80 80 STREET RESTORATION SLURRY SEAL 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 SAN JACINTO RIVER MITIGATION FOR LAKESHORE DR. BRIDG E MAIN ST/SULPHUR ST DECONTAMINATION 1-151 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT STUDY REPORT,DESIGN, CONSTRIUCT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 15 2 15 5 REMOVE CONTAMINATION 150 3 f-15 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 2.000 20 2,000 20 10,000 10 10,000 10 FIRE STATION M CVICKER PARK NEW BUILDING & ACCESS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER STREET REHABILITATION 1,870 445 COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS (CPA) BETWEEN CENTRAL AVE. & ENTERPRISE WAY 32 3 GREENWALD AVE. - WITHIN CITY LIMITS 145 145 OUTFLOW CHANNEL - PHASE I FROM LAKE 70 GRAHAM AVE. PEDISTRIAN WALKWAY 755 5 TRAFFIC SIGNA LS - COLLIER AVE. AT CENTRAL AVE & RIVERSIDE DR. 5710 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 650 3 OUTLET CHANNEL PHASE 11 IMPROVEMENTS GRAHAM AVE. TO HEALD AVE. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY 482 2 CORYDON ST.- UNION ST. TO MISSION TRAIL STREET REHABILITATION 275 2 DIAMOND DR. a, CASINO DR. REPLACE DETECTOR LOOPS LOOP DETECTORS 7 5 Page 2 of 2 Note; Alt figures 1n thousands ($000's) ITEM NO. . PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE 02/03 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 03/04 T OTAL ME AS. A COST FUNDS 04/05 TOT AL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 05/06 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 06/07 TOTAL MEAS, A COST FUNDS 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Go Ca MACHADO ST - STREET REHABILITATION LINCOLN ST. TO ALVARADO ST. STREET REHABILITATI ON _ 300 5 LAKESHORE DR. - STREET REHABILITATION LAKE ST. TO MACHADO ST. STREET REHABILITATION 410 20 LAKESHORE DR. - STREET REHABILITATION MACHADO ST, TO WISCONSIN ST. STREET REHABILITATION 190 20 GUNNERSON ST. - LAKESHORE DR. TD RIVERSIDE DRIVE STREET REHABILITATION 400 30 LAKESHORE DR. TERRA COTTA TO DRYDEN ST. STREET WIDENING PAVEMENT WIDENING 325 20 450 30 LAKESHORE DR: JERNIGAN ST TO 200' EAST OF MACHADO ST - STREET WIDENING STREET WIDENING 480 30 SUMNER AVE:: MAIN ST TO CHANEY ST PAVEMENT REHABILITATION/OVERLAY STREET REHABILITATION 75 20 500 30 TOTALS: 3,999 885 2,947 340 3,090 360 11,210 350 11,280 350 MEASURE A CURRENT YEAR ALLOCATION MEASURE A PRIOR YEA R CARRY-OVER • • 365 520 350 355 365 370 • • • January 9, 2003 CITY Of ll[S[RT 73-510 ,FRED WARING DRIVE PAL M DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL:.760 3346-061I FAX: 760 341-7098 inroLapalrn_desert_org- Mr. Jerry Rivera Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3580 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 062901 pECE111/Eiro JAN 217 i TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: Revision - City of Palm Desert's Capital Improvement Program (Measure "A") Fiscal Year 2003 Dear Jerry, This correspondence is to bring to your attention, for your review and consideration, a revision of Measure "A" documents previously submitted, Due to resistance by homeowners in the area, we are abandoning plans for the right hand turn pocket at Indian Springs Mobile Home Park. The City of Palm Desert is requesting that the unexpended funds of $150,000.00 be transferred from the Indian Springs project to the Fred Waring widening project, which is also an approved Measure "A" project. This transfer of funds will not change the net amount of funds programmed for the City of Palm Desert, and it will help to shore up the Fred Waring widening project against unexpected additional costs. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused, and as always,, we appreciate the cooperation and coordination that RCTC has shown the City of Palm Desert. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Si Michael Errante Engineering Manager ME/rg cc: Carlos L. Ortega, City Manager Homer L. Croy, Assistant City Manager for Development Services Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer J. Luis Espinoza, Finance Operations Manager Mark Greenwood, Engineering Manager Joseph S. Gaugush, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 332 „C.a„3.,,011 • RIVERSIDE COUNT ti' TRANSi RTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002 — 2003 Agency: City of P alm Desert Prepared by: Joseph S. Gaugush, P.E . Phon e No. : 760/346-0611 ext. 566 Date: June 13, 2002 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST $000'S MEASURE A FUNDS $000'S 1. Palm Desert High School Access on Cook Roadway & signal 1,236 1,236 Street 2. Portola Avenue/Dinah Shore Extension Roadway widening 1,600 1,600 3. FA , ‘M/4 Roadway widening 150 150 Portoia Interchange at 1-10 Feasibility Study and ROW 2,000 2,000 5, Magnesia Falls Drive Bridge/Street Improvements from Monterey Avenue to De ep Canyon Road fridge construction, street widening, and traffic signal modifications (additional funding due to expanding of sco pe of project — see prior year summary for funding carryover) 1,000 1,000 6. Westbound Dinah Shore from Miriam Way to Street improvements 385 385 Key Largo Avenue 7, Mo nterey Avenue between Hovley Lane West and Country Club Driv e Median island construction 65 65 8. Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/COD Intersection improvements 66 66 9. San Pablo Avenue at Highway 111 Intersection im. rovements 66 66 • lI1O/03 • G, ILPuOWorks,,Ryrm Gayle rlWord Files\RCTC Funds Program Form - FY 62 .03 yr 1.0 0c - ad RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ME ASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002 — 2003 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by. Joseph S. Gaugush, P.E. Pho ne No,: 760/346-0611 ext. 566 Date: June 13, 2002 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1, Palm Desert High School Access on Cook Street Roadway & signal 1,236 1,236 2, Portia Avenue/Dinah Shore Extension Roadway widening 1,600 1,600 3.iitr'(ffgrr• Turn Pocket 150 150 l' . Portola Interchange at 1-10 Feasibility Study and ROW 2,000 2,000 5. Magnesia Falls Drive Bridge/Street Improvements from Monterey Avenue to Deep Canyon Road Bridge construction, street widening, and traffic signal , modifications (additional funding due to expanding of scope of project — see prior year summary for funding carryover) 1,000 1,000 6. Westbound Dinah Shore from Miriam Way to Street improvements 385 385 Key Largo Avenue 7. Monterey Avenue between Hovley Lane West and Country Club Drive Median island construction 65 65 8. Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/CCD Intersection improvements 66 66 9, San Pablo Avenue at Highway 111 _ Intersection improvements 66 66 • • 1!10103. G:IPubWorks' Rya 1 Gay,er\W ord FIIOsIRCTC Funas Pr ogram Form - FY 02 .03 yr 1.d. AGENDA ITEM 7H • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget & Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-33-055 for Additional On -Call Material Testing BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-33-055 (Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. RO-9832) with Ninyo & Moore to provide additional on -call material testing services in support of Measure "A" projects scheduled for construction for the remainder of this fiscal year, for an additional base amount of $ 86,000.00; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the October 8, 1997 meeting, the Commission awarded Agreement No. RO-9832 to Ninyo & Moore to provide on -call material testing services for Measure "A" Construction Projects. The following table is a summary of Ninyo & Moore's contract actions to date: Date Description Base Work Changes Extra Work Status Total Contract Not to Exceed 11/24/97 Original Agreement - On Call Material Testing for FY (97/98) $119,700 $23,940 $143,640 06/17/98 Extra Work(EW) #1 Additional Testing for SW #35 $4,000 ($4,000) $143,640 07/08/98 Amendment #1 - On Call Material Testing for FY (98/99) $91,760 $0 $235,400 11/12/98 Amendment #/2 - Porphyry Spur $ Environmental Site Assessment 245 $O $244,645 01/12/99 EW #2 - West Corona Repairs $4,000 ($4,0001 $244,645 335 Date Description Base Work Changes Extra Work Status Total Contract Not to Exceed 04/01/99 EW #3 - SS Platform Ped Xing Roof $427 ($427) $244,645 04/02/99 EW #4 - Additional Testing for Phase! Soundwalls $15,000 ($15,000} $244,645 07/14/99 Amendment #3 On Call Material Testing for FY (99/00) $77,185 $22,815 $344,645 07/12/00 Amendment #4 - On Call Material Testing for FY (00/01) and FY 101/02) $122,752 $0 $467,398 10/15/01 EW #5 - Additional Testing Sound Wall #36 $20,719 (520,719) $467,398 06/12/02 Addendum #5 On Call Material Testing for FY {02/03) $177,100 $17,710 $662,208 CURRENT CONTRACT STATUS $64'1,889 $20,319 $662,208 TOTAL INVOICED TO DATE $633,864 FUNDS REMAINING $8,025 820,319 $28,344 Because of unforeseen circumstances, associated with the construction of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station, and additional material testing services required to support construction of the Riverside -Downtown and Riverside-LaSierra Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Projects, Ninyo & Moore was required to provide services in excess of what was estimated and budgeted. The following is a summary of Ninyo & Moore's cost to date, estimated cost to complete, original budget, and requested additional budget, for RCTC construction projects this year to date: Project Name Cost to Date Estimated Cost to Complete Original Budget Requested Additional Funning - Rt 74 lnitial Grading $2,058.48 $ 3,283.52 $21,342.00 ($16,000.00) N. Main Corona $146,410.42 $36,389.58 599,200.00 $83,600.00 La Sierra Phase! $29,421.65 $5,078.35 $21,000.00 $13,500.00 La Sierra Phase 11 0.00 $28,500.00 $28,500.00 0.00 Downtown Riverside $12,526,21 $5,973.79 $13,600.00 $4,90.0.00 Pedley 0.00 $14,800.00 $14,800.00 0.00 $ 94,025.00 $ 86,000.00_ BUDGET REMAINING $8,025.00 BUDGET REQUEST $86,000.00 Staff has reviewed Ninyo & Moore's scope of work and cost of services for the additional work and is in concurrence. The proposed scope of work and cost estimates received from Ninyo and Moore are attached for your review. The existing $20,319 of extra work contingency will remain in place for future on call contingencies. 336 • • • Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $86,000.00 Source of Funds: STA LTF, and Measure "A" Budget Adjustment: Y GLA No.: 221-33-81120 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 02/18/03 Attachment: Proposed Scope Work and Cost Estimates from Ninyo & Moore • 337 pithy" ours • Georechrilcal and Environmental Sciences Consultants February 14, 2003 Project Nos. 203941 001 204089001 204224001 Mr. Karl Sauer Riverside County Transportation Commission P. 0. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502 Subject: Budget Summary and Projection Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Services Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Sauer: • In accordance with your request, we have prepared this budget summary for our construction materials testing and inspection services being performed for the Riverside County Transporta- tion Commission (RCTC). This summary, detailed in the attached Table 1, includes a description of Contract Authorizations, Project Budgets, Cost Accumulated, Estimated Fee to Complete Cur- rent Projects, and Requested Budget Adjustments to complete the projects currently under construction, as well as projects that are anticipated to begin this fiscal year. As documented in the referenced letters, some of the projects currently under construction have had increased materials testing and inspection costs due to additional requested scope of work. The additional work was requested as a result of unanticipated environmental conditions encoun- tered during construction, additional testing and engineering services, and special deputy inspection services that were not originally included in our authorized scope of services. Based on our recent discussions with representatives from RCTC, we understand that our re- maining services for projects currently under construction this fiscal year will include soil and base testing, field inspection for concrete and welding, field sampling, non-destructive field test- ing, and laboratory testing, including placement of the lightweight concrete. Our estimated cost for these services will be approximately $86,000 (eighty-six thousand dollars) more than our cur - 475 Goddard - Suire 200 • Irvine, California 926 8 Phone (949) 753-7070 • Fax (9449) 753-707 Phoenix • Irvine • San Diego Las Angeles • .Oakland • Las Vegas • Salt Lake City • Ontario Riverside County Transportation Commission February 14, 2003 Budget Summary and Projection Various Project Nos. rent authorized budget. A detailed breakdown of these costs per project is included in Table 1. We understand that RCTC is in the process of providing a contract amendment for our requested increase in budget. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service on this project. If you have any ques- tions regarding this letter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, NINYO & MOORE Kurt S. Yoshii, P.E. Senior Project Engineer RWMfICSYICAPIJVJmll Attachments: References Table 1 — Budget Summary and Projection Distribution: (2) Addressee 3Q4I-i IC 2 Jalal Vakili, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Engineer 339 *nriasr/oere • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission February 14, 2003 Budget Summary and Projection Various Project Nos. REFERENCES Ninyo & Moore, 2003, Extra Work Request, La Sierra Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Phase 1, Riverside, California: Project No. 204224001, dated January 21. Ninyo & Moore, 2002, Breakdown of Services and Budget Estimate, North Main Corona Com- muter Rail Station, Corona, California: Project No. 203941001, dated December 24. Riverside County Transportation Commission, 2002, Amendment No. 5 (02-33-077) to Agree- ment (R0-9832) with Ninyo & Moore for Construction Materials Testing, dated July 25. Ninyo & Moore, 2002, Extra Work Request, Environmental Consulting Services, North Main Corona Commuter Rail Station, Corona, California: Project No. 203941001, dated No- vember 27. Ninyo & Moore, 2002, Transfer of Budget Allocation for Geotcchnical and Materials Testing Services Route 74 Initial Grading (Highway 74), Lake Elsinore, California and North Main Commuter Rail Station, Corona, California: Project No. 203941001, dated Novem- ber 27_ Ninyo & Moore, 2002, Construction Materials Testing and Inspection Services North Main Co- rona Commuter Rail Station Corona, California, Project No. 203941001, dated November 7. ;941.114 340 lying°&Apure 3 Table 1 RCTC On -Cal! Materials Testing Services Budget Summary and Projection Contract Summary Contract Document Original Agreement RO-9832 Extra Work No. 1 Amendment No. 1 Amendment No, 2 Extra Work No. 2 Extra Work No. 3 Extra Work No. 4 Amendment No. 3 Amendment No. 4 Extra Work No. 5 Amendment No. 5 Totals: Project Billing Summary Protect Name Rt. 91 Sound Wail # 35 Metrolink Station Rt. 91 Phase 1 Sound Wails Pigeon Pass Park & Ride West Corona Pavement Repair Porphyry `"Y" - West Corona Overcrossing La Sierra Overcrossing SR -91 Phase 2 Sound Wall No. 98 SR -91 Sound Wall Nos. 635A & 8 1-10 and Apache Trails SR -91 S.W. Nos. 110, 121 & 161 SR -91 S.W. No. 36 SR 74 Initial Grading North Main Corona Metrolink Station La Sierra Station Parking Lot Expansion - Phase 1 Downtown Riverside Station Parking Lot Expansion Pedley Station Parking Lot Expansion Totals: 200212003 Project Budget Projection Project Name SR 74 Initial Grading North Main Corona Metrolink Station La Sierra Station Parking Lot Expansion - Phase 1 La Sierra Station Parking Lot Expansion - Phase 2 Downtown Riverside Station Parking Lot Expansion Pedley Station Parking Lot Expansion Change in Date: Authorization Extra Work 11/24/1997 5119,699.53 523,940.00 6/17/98 54,000.00 ($4,000.00) 7/8/1998 591,760.88 50.00 11/12/1998 59,245.15 $0.00 1/12/1999 $4,000.00 (54,000.00) 411/1999 5427.00 (5427.00) 4/2/1999 515,000.00 (515,000.00) 7/14/1999 577,185 00 522,815.00 8/1/2000 $122,752.00 50.00 10/16/2001 $20,719,00 50.00 7/25/2002 5177,100.00 517,710.00 5641,888.56 $41,038.00 Cost Accumulated Budget Difference 523,781.65 $23,781.65 50.00 5109,955.15 5109,955.15 50.00 557,840_03 557,840.03 50.00 $16,500.51 516,500.51 50.00 57,052.63 57,052.63 50.00 $9,224.61 59,224.61 50.00 $44,635.74 $44,635.74 50.00 546,922.16 546,922.16 50.00 516,333.02 $16,333.02 50.00 531,360.50 531,369.50 50.00 510,472.81 510,472.81 50.00 557,757.82 557,757.82 50.00 $11,601.61 511,601.61 50.00 $2,058.48 521,342.00 19,283.52 $146,410.42 599,200.00 (47,210.42) $29,421.65 521,000.00 (8,421.65) $12,526.21 513,600.00 1,073.79 50.00 514.800.00 14,800.00 5633,864.00 5613,389.24 (20,474.76) 2002/2003 Currently Authorized Budget: Billed to Date: February 14, 2003 Currently Authorized $119,699.53 5123,699.53 5215,460.41 5224,705.56 5228,705.56 5229.132.56 $244,132.56 5321,317.56 5444,069.56 $464,788.56 5641.888.56 $641,888.56 $633,864.00 2002/2003 Budget Remaining: $8,024.56 TotalEstimated Fee: Current Budget Remaining: Estimated Fee to Complete 53,283.52 536,389.58 55,078.35 528,500.00 55,973.79 $14,800.00 $94,025.24 -58,024.56 Total 2002/2003 Requested Budget Amendment: $86,000.681 Requested Budget Adjustment (516,000.00) 583,600.00 513,500.00 50.00 54,900.00 50.00 586,000.00 • Not to Exceed 5143,639.53 5143.639.53 5235,400.41 $244,645.56 5244,645.56 5244,645.56 $244,645.56 5344.645.56 5467,397.56 $488,11 6.56 5659.598.56 5659,598.56 341 /Vivo Mture • • 39-�-1 b'n' • AGENDA ITEM 71 • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA T1ON COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Measure "A" Funded Specialized Transit Programs STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to authorize RCTC staff to seek and/or develop additions! Measure "A" Funded Specialized Transit Programs. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission has had a long-time commitment to meeting the special transit needs of seniors and persons with disabilities through its specialized transit grant program. In addition to traditional public dial -a -ride services, the Commission has granted funds to non-profit agencies to provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas for inter -community travel, and for riders having very special transit needs. While these programs have been successful over the years in providing improved transit access for western county riders, there are still residents that encounter difficulties in scheduling rides. The Commission currently provides Measure "A" Specialized Transit funds to seven non-profit agencies throughout western Riverside County. Attachment 1 provides an historical overview of Measure "A" grant recipients since the program's inception in FY 1990. As indicated on the attachment, allocation of Measure "A" Specialized Transit funds has been declining since its high-water mark of $2,560,817 in FY 1998. As indicated by the 2000 census, Riverside County's population is continuing to grow. The Largest growth in population, with specialized transit needs, are seniors and the disabled as both segments of the population rely on alternate forms of transportation. Public transit provides needed mobility to access life -maintenance trip purposes (healthcare, groceries, etc.) as well as life -enriching trip purposes (church, social engagements, etc.). Western Riverside County has, in response to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), maintained an historical transit commitment through the Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) local dial -a -ride system as well as ADA-only intercity dial -a -ride services, However, with the aging population, more and more seniors are becoming ADA certified which is placing a strain on an already burdened system. 342 As a result, RTA finds itself in an uncomfortable position of having to frequently cancel paratransit trips scheduled by the senior population to accommodate the mandates of the ADA. Both Commission and RTA staffs have been working together to enhance the transportation options for western Riverside County residents. Following are some ideas that Commission and RTA staff have been discussing: 1) Taxicab and wheelchair -accessible minivans utilized as a supplemental support to RTA's existing dial -a -ride services. To test the feasibility of taxi services, RTA recently scheduled 10 -trips with Yellow Cab and 9 trips with AAA Inland Empire Cab companies. Attachment 2 provides detailed information on the trips provided by the two cab companies. While only a limited number of trips were. provided via taxi services, it is important to note that RTA experienced no senior -citizen travel/trip denials during that time frame; 2) Senior shuttles operated by Senior Centers and/or City operated Parks and Recreation Departments; and 3) Contracted "fee for services" in which compensation is directly related to the provision of specific services. If approved to continue researching the above items as potentia) enhancements to existing transportation services, staff will bring forth proposed transportation programs for further consideration by the Plans and Programs Committee. Attachments: 1) Historical Listing of Measure "A„ Recipients 2) RTA's Interoffice Memo • 343 • • ACtacnment 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Historical Listing of Measure "A" Specialized Transit Program Western Riverside County Area AG ENCY FISCAL YE AP - DOLLAR AMOUNT APPROVED SERVICE AREA 69-90 1 90.41 91-92 92-93 93.94 - 94-95 -524 95-96 96-97 97-98 100 _ 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 TOTAL 524,100 Ability Counts tozona♦'Rfversrde Anza Valley Se niors i.nza 532.740 532,740 585,500 592 323.092 5266,445 Blindness Support Rttver5ide City _ 535,503 542,014 .8.73 5a '- 945.163 5157.149 Care-A-VanTransil System We stern CouruyArea 530 .428 581,073 583,900 597-000 3116.000 0100.000 5100,000 5132.509 313 a 3; 5165 000 51,050,144 City of Banning City a! nning _ 525.000 511.244' 812.151 573,085 545.000 _ 550,000 5112.329 0107,181 Cit of Bea umont City or -Bea umont _ ... City _ _ r _ ity ono Cdrone-Norco Family YWCA 'City of Corona 524,000 527,000 515.840 $15 .825 595,385 598.157 _ 585 120 541 .000 539,000 514.813 - 5- 5441 .327 $35 .348 of Norco Parks ana Rec. Family 340 000 .5; 540 .700 Service Assonalion of Western Riverside Coun ty Friends Jump, Mira Lo ma, rediey. Rubldoun Areas ... . 657 575.500 5100,000 5109.740 5100,000 5125,000 5125.000 5114 621 572.500 5920 ,172 of Moreno V&Fley Senior Center Cily of Moreno Valley 51 .1 557 1 523,250 - 536 .500. 526.000 - - 526,000 527.300 527.300 528 ,500 528,500 522.157 - -- 5258,507 Housing Autnonty of Riverside Jurupa Area 57 .500 57 .500 Intend A105 Project Western ounty Area - 539„000 549,433 562,082 362.062 502 000 562,000 587 445 587.449 588,000 5509,455 Menitee Valle y Medical Center Sou thweste rn County Area S16 875 - _ 515.800 Mt San Jadinlo Alliance Aannershlp San Jacinto Area 5025 - - -- 5925 Io Preserve Independent Living Western County Area 543 408 543.409 5152 .000 5171 .050 5260.854 5300,000 5240,000 5240.000 5240,000 5240,000 . 5240 000 - 52 ,170,731 Rente d & Senior Volunteers' P am 'Dept Western County Area - ^ 57.985 57.985 k ale County C unity Action Rive rside Western County Area - 56 .948 - - - 56,948 (-aunty Housing A uthority (Eddie Dee Smith Se nior Center) - - 07 500 57.500 515.000 Riverside County Office of EducaUdn Riverside Western Coun ty Are a 55,130 - 53,480 53,480 53.930 53.480 519 .050 County Service Area 143 •Piverside MunieterTemecu ia 524,550 - 524,550 5270 748 General Hospital Western County re, 570.518 ' 570.1121 _ 540.990 "' 550,100 516,598 522.250 Riverside Special Sena City of Riverside 5-23.696 315.295 519.000 322, 880 580,612 546,000 524,804 522,200 551.000 526.000 5331 487 -3,170.574 Riverside Transit Agency Western County Area 043,911 511.950 5490.893 5363,450 5293.519 51,335,851 5381.0012 5254,5700 Riverside Transit AgencylRCTC Riverside - - Western Cou nty Are a - I 320,000 520 .000 County Transportation Commission Rive rside/Re dley - 510,000 - - 516,000 rranspo rtatwn SpeciatistsfMed4rans Volunteer So uthwestern County Area 570,120 520.320 520,320 540,250 5100. 915 595400 5142.000 5142 .000 5204,700 5150000 5150,000 5228,500 3238,,500 3140,088 51,681,113 Center of Grealer Riverside Transportation Information System 522.850 558,551 5129 980 392.070 51,245,063 380,356 31,253,365 580.365 52,560,817 3.80 000'. 380 .000 580.000 580000 881 120 3875 .303 _-----t, TOTAL 556,274 5150.454 5155,183 5323,595 5393,973 51,319,711 51,333,141 51,054,020 51,019,285 $962,326 5842,655 12,688,971 High-wat er monk - Measure "A" Specialized Transit funded programs 2127720032.08 PM Spec19tlred Tonsil OVervie W of Recipient% Attachment • • Riversid Transit Agency Interoffice Memo Tuesday, February 18, 2003 TO: Tanya Love FROM: Grant Bradshaw SUBJECT: Taxicab replacement of paratransit services During the past month, we utilized local taxicab services to augment paratransit services with the followin, results: Yellow Cab Six trips taken on 01/30/03 and four trips taken on 02/06/03. Included local trips in Moreno Valley. from Moreno Valley to the City of Perris. from the Tyler Galleria to Moreno Valley, and from Banning to Hemet. Total Trips: 10 Total Amount: $214.58 AAA Inland Empire Cab Five trips taken on 01/30/03 and four trips taken on 02/06/03. Included local Jurupa/Mira Loma and Riverside to Mira Loma trips. Those trips booked in February included Murrieta to 1-lemet, local Hemet. and Sun City to Murrieta trips. Total Trips: 9 Total Amount: $238.50 The nineteen (19) trips cost $453.08. These costs are very closely "in -line" or below those which would normally have been experienced had the RTA directly provided these rides. The reservations included persons with disabilities traveling in wheelchairs and using walkers or other assistive devices. During the dates we used the taxicabs, we had no senior -citizen travel/trip denials. Also, boarding and alighting times were monitored closely -- no customers were picked -up or dropped outside of their "window" times (the RTA closely observes a thirty -minute window). In addition, customer comments during our follow-up to all trips indicated that the service was very well received. Customers who normally travel together (for example, from their homes to the senior center for lunch) were able to travel together during their taxicab travels. I will provide specific travel lists and itemized costs for each trip at your request. Please let me know if I can supply additional information or if you have comments or concerns. Thank you. 345 AGENDA ITEM 7J • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM. Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager Robert Wunderlich, Bechtel Resident Engineer THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-33-038 for Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase II Parking Lot Expansion BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-33-038 for the construction of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase II Parking Lot Expansion Project to Riverside Construction Co. for the amount of $1,199,850 plus a contingency amount of $150,150 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed contract authorization of $1,350,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its May 9, 2001 meeting, the Commission approved the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee to address policy issues identified in the draft Station Management Plan submitted separately to the Commission at that same meeting. One of the main findings of the draft Station Management Plan was that by 2010, four out of the five, existing and proposed, Metrolink stations are forecasted to have parking deficits. In conjunction with direction from both the Commission and the newly formed Ad Hoc Committee, RCTC has completed negotiations and is in final escrow for the purchase of additional right of way for the expansion of the existing Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Commuter Rail Station. 346 At its November 14, 2001 meeting, the Commission approved the selection of and authorized the Chairman to enter into Agreement No. 02-33-029 with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. (ER), to provide engineering, environmental and design services for development and implementation of a Parking Lot Expansion Plan for the existing Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station. At its May 8, 2002 meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise for bids to construct Phase 1 of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion which included the Photovoltaic Carport Structures Project. At its September 11, 2002 meeting, the Commission awarded Agreement No. 02-51-089 to Riverside Construction, Inc., for the construction of Phase I of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project. The Phase I Project is scheduled to complete construction by the end of March 2003. The Phase I Project will add an additional 225 parking spaces to the existing 350 parking spaces, for a total of approximately 575 parking spaces. At its July 10, 2002 meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise for bids to construct Phase 11 of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project. The Phase II Project will add an additional 425 parking spaces to the 575 parking spaces that will be available at the completion of the Phase I Project, for a total of approximately 1,000 parking spaces. It is anticipated that construction of the Phase II Project will start at the beginning of May 2003, and will be complete in October of 2003. The project was advertised starting on December 4, 2002 with the bid opening on February 6, 2003. Twelve (12) bids were received and opened on February 6, 2003 at 10:00 a.m. A summary of the bids received are shown in Table A: TABLE A Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase 11 Parking Lot Expansion Bid Summary Firm (In order from Low bid to High bid) Bid Amount Amount Over Low Bid Engineers Estimate $1,257,574.50 NIA Riverside Construction Co. Riverside, CA $1,199,550.00 $0.00 2 E.A. Mendoza, Inc. Irvine, CA $1,311,100.00 $111,250.00 3 Griffith Company Santa Ana, CA $1,328,519.20 $128,669.20 • • 347 TABLE A Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase II Parking Lot Expansion Bid Summary Firm (In order from Low bid to High bid) Bid Amount Amount Over Low Bid 4 Vance Corporation Rialto, CA $1,329,123.60 $129,273.60 5 R.J. Noble Company Orange, CA $1,390,893.70 $191,043.70 6 Betts Construction Temecula, CA $1,439,611.95 $239,761.95 7 Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Corona, CA $1,445,548.00 $245,698.00 8 Laird Construction Co., Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA $1,461,146.00 $261,296.00 Tyner Paving Co. Los Angeles, CA $1,539,977.60 _ $ 340,127.60 10 Sean Malek Engineering & Construction Perris, CA $1,541,935.00 8342,085.00 11 Adams/Mallory Const. Co., Inc. Placentia, CA $1,550,211.30 $350,361.30 12 Metro Builders & Engineers Group Ltd. Newport Beach, CA $1,849,214.98 $649,364.98 The bids were reviewed by Legal Counsel and staff, and all concurred that the Riverside Construction Co. low bid was the lowest responsive bid received for the project. A summary of the review of the three (3) lowest bids received and the responsiveness of the bids are detailed in Table B: TABLE B Checklist Item Riverside Construction Co. E.A. Mendoza, inc. Griffith Company 1 Bid Letter Yes Yes Yes 2 Schedule of Prices - Bid Amount (math check) - Bid Item Comparison - w/Eng's Est - w/other Bidders - Unbalanced Bid Items Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 348 3 Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes 4 List of Subcontractors - Prime Performs > 50% Work Yes Yes Yes 5 Bidder Information Forms - Reference Check Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8 Non -Collusion Affidavit Yes Yes Yes 7 Evidence of Insurance Yes Yes Yes Table C summarizes the costs associated with the construction of the Riverside - La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase 11 Parking Lot Expansion for the three (3) lowest bids received: TABLE C (Itemized breakdown of the lowest three (3) bids) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO. E.A. MENDOZA, INC. GRIFFITH M COPANY 1 MOBILIZATION $52,681.00 $10,000.00 $68,000,00 2 CLEAN-UP $10,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,000.00 3 CONSTRUCTION WATER $3,600.00 $2,000.00 $2,200.00 4 DEMOLITION AND REMOVALS $27,000.00 $247,016.00 $65,000.00 5 SITE CLEARING AND GRUBBING $10,000.00 $80,000.00 $10,000.00 6 SAFETY AND SHORING $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 7 IMPORTED BORROW $151,800.00 $82,800.00 $213,900.00 8 REMOVE AND RECOMPACT $30,130.00 $19,650.00 $34,453.00 9 EROSION CONTROL $7,800.00 $2,000.00 $3,500.00 10 CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE $109,438.00 $93,804.00 $95,367.40 11 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT $151,495.00 $125,630.00 $144,105.00 12 PCC CURB $36,157.00 i $34,254.00 $67,746.80 13 PCC CURB AND GUTTER $2.9,547.00 $32,830.00 $50,558.20 14 PCC GUTTER 1 $4,472.00 $4,816.00 $3,508.80 15 PCC CROSS GUTTER/SPANDREL $10,748.00 $10,748.00 $12,897.60 16 PCC SIDEWALK $33,852.00 $33,852.00 $40,622.40 • • 349 • • TABLE C (Itemized breakdown of the lowest three (3) bids) ITEM NO ITEM DESCRIPTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO. E.A. MENDOZA, INC. GRIFFITH COMPANY 17 PAVEMENT STRIPING, MARKING & SIGNAGE $6,570.00 $5,000.00 $6,500.00 18 30 INCH RCP, 1500D $23,310.00 $16,650.00 $23,310.00 19 24 INCH RCP, 15000 $20,460.00 $14,300.00 $16,500.00 20 18 INCH RCP, 1500D $26,125.00 $13,750.00 $17,050.00 21 24 INCH PCC FLARED INLET $2,400.00 $3,000.00 $2,340.00 22 CATCH BASIN, W=7' $3,525.00 $4,000.00 $3,300.00 23 CATCH BASIN, W=4', WITH KRISTAR FILTER $12,400.00 $12,000.00 $15,600.00 24 PARKWAY DRAIN, 8=24" $1,565.00 $1,500.00 $3,700.00 25 CONCRETE COLLAR $2,940.00 $2,400.00 $1,560.00 26 MANHOLE JM $2,840.00 $4,000.00 $3,700.00 27 JUNCTION STRUCTURE "C" $870.00 $1,500.00 $1,100.00 28 PCC HEADWALL/RELOCATE TRASH RACK $4,400.00 $20,000.00 $4,300.00 29 IRRIGATION SPRINKLER SYSTEM $91,800.00 $150,000.00 $92,000.00 30 LANDSCAPING $156,280.00 $125,000.00 $158,000.00 31 ' LANDSCAPE, 90 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD $5,4fl0.00 $2,400.00 $2,000.00 32 BASIC ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS $50,305.00 $30,000.00 $39,000.00 33 STREET LIGHT (INDIANA AVE., INCLUDES CONDUIT & PULLBOXES) $32,285.00 838,500.00 $31,900.00 34 RELOCATE LIGHTING FIXTURE, SINGLE, & EXISTING POLE, RELAMP AND REBALLAST, NEW FOUNDATION $6,900.00 $9,000.00 $6,750.00 35 RELOCATE LIGHTING FIXTURE, DOUBLE, & EXISTING POLE, RELAMP AND REBALLAST, NEW FOUNDATION $23,450.00 $4,000.00 $23,240.00 36 LIGHTING FIXTURE, DOUBLE, POLE & NEW FOUNDATION $25,425.00 $27,500.40 $25,500.00 37 REBALLAST AND RELAMP EXISTING DOUBLE FIXTURE IN PLACE $3,494.00 $600.40 $3,060.00 350 TABLE C (itemized breakdown of the lowest three (3) bids) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO. E.A. MENDOZA, INC. GRIFFITH COMPANY 38 LIGHTING FIXTURE, DOUBLE, MOUNT ON EXISTING POLE AND RELOCATE, NEW FOUNDATION $15,200.00 $12,400.00 $15,200.00 39 REBALLAST AND RELAMP TWO EXISTING SINGLE FIXTURES AND MOUNT AS DOUBLE FIXTURE ON EXISTING POLE AND RELOCATE, NEW FOUNDATION $5,500.00 $11,200.00 $6,400.00 40 REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION $4,590.00 $5,400.00 $9,450.00 GRAND TOTAL $1,199,850.00 $1,311.100.00 $1,328,519.20 From staff's and Legal Counsel's review of the bids received, staff is recommending that the Commission award Agreement No. 03-33-038 for the construction of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase 11 Parking Lot Expansion project to Riverside Construction Co. for the amount of $1,199,850.00 plus a contingency amount of $150,150.00 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total contract authorization of $1,350,000.00. The standard RCTC construction contract will be used, pursuant to Legal Counsel review. Financial information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $1,350,000 Source of Funds: Measure "A" funds Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 221-33-81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: f Date: 02118103 Attachment: Agreement No. 03-33-038 • • 351 AGENDA ITEM 7K • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Karen Leland, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Commuter Rail Program Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Riverside Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of January averaged 4,393, a 9% increase from the month of December. The Line has averaged an overall decrease of 4% from a year ago January 2002. January on -time performance averaged 93% inbound (-4% from December) and 97% outbound (unchanged from December). Inland Empire -Orange County Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line for the month of January averaged 2,997, a 10% increase from the month of December. The line has averaged an overall increase of 2% from a year ago January 2002. January on -time performance averaged 90% inbound (unchanged from December) and 89% outbound (-4% from December). 91 Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of January averaged 1,596, a 1% decrease from the month of December. 352 January on -time performance averaged 92% inbound (-1% from December) and 98% outbound (+2% from December). Rideshare 2 Rails (R2R) Program Ridcsha re HAILS Rideshare Incentives: As of January 31', enrollment was at 187 {Riverside -Downtown 61, Pedley 15, La Sierra 44, and West Corona 61, North Main Corona 6), freeing up 94 spaces for new riders. RTA Express Bus Shuttle: Ridership for the month of December averaged 16 one- way trips per day, basically unchanged from the month of December. Station Activities North Main Corona Station - "Welcome to Our Neighborhood" Demonstration Project: Six local businesses have agreed to offer discounts to Metrolink passengers who board at the station. In exchange, these businesses have been supplied with train schedules at their locations and are designated as Station Community Partners. A coupon booklet containing discounts are currently being distributed. Staff will report back on the results of the project. In addition, during the month of February, the Fender Museum of Music and the Arts is partnering with ROTC to provide free admissions for Metrolink ticket holders to the Museurn, a Jazz concert, and a chance to enter into a drawing to win a free fender guitar. RCTC Metrolink Station Daily Activities: Daily activities are recorded by station security guards. Attached is summary data covering January 2003. Attachments: 1) Metrolink Performance Summaries (January 2003) 2) RCTC Metrolink Stations Daily Activity Report (January 2003) • • 353 • MLETG OUNK PERFORMANCE NC SUMMARIES J fl 2003 o0o • • ETROLINK 354 MLTROUNK V/ZZ/Z/g.76 a • 3 • 356 95 0% 4 96% 97% 96°5 METROLINK ON -TIME PERFORMANCE Weekday Trains (Latest 13 Months) 05% 9t5% 94% S1 :- 93% Jan 02 Feb 02 Mar 02 Ap 02 May 02 Jun 02 Ju 02 Aug 02 096 Amvtng Within &Minutes Of Scheduled Time I — —p 'l Oct 02 Nov 02 Dec 02 Jan 03 OT-l3MoNew 357 % of Train Delays By Responsibility January 2003 brawn wertmw Sauce �S TRK-[gnu"" UPRR Vandalus 3CRRRtii.Ca"2 sY 2% 9y, 3% Mechanical Br1SF ,t*.\‘'N Odle 35' OF -Agree Law -Ent imams d5C TRK•Contractor 1% SIG-COntraelOr ex SGRRA 1S% Passcngp 2!0 news Wed.no semen % of Train Delays By Responsibility 12 Month Period Ending January 2003 UPRR Vandalism 4% COP e L4w- 22% 2% Mocharuw[ 12% kDrou (SCRRA4 8% 5 358 • PERFORMANCE CHARTS - BACKUP 1I 11METROLINK • 6 • 359 I 4WIL.I .%.J4I11r\ rArLrk.rk, IfIFCCINIJA L f rioacr1 ucrE 1 tura, THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED ROUTE => Ventura County Antelope Valley San 'Bernardino Burbank Turns Riverside Orange, County, Ent Ernpl OC Riv/Fulll LA TOTAL. SYSTEM % Change Vs Prior Mo Jan 02 3,566 4.813 10,086 480 4,596 5,865 2,930 107 32,443 7% Feb 02 3,612 5,031 10,235 464 4,635 5.882 3,010 109 32,978 2% Mar 02 3,650 5,135 10.082 518 4,615 5,931 3,033 133 33,097 0% ,Apr 02 3441 4913 10124 507 4524 5848 2791 109 32257 -3%n May 02 3,565 5,597 10,039 525 4,288 5,794 2,916 847 33,571 4% Jun 02 3,781_ 5.694 10,286 533 4,202 5,651 2.982 1,165 34,294 2% Jul 02 3,664 5,840 9,817 510 4,159 5,519 2,958 3.092 1,292 1,378 33,759 33,485 -2%r, -1% Aug 02 3,506 5,694 9,688 524 4,047 5,556 Sep 02 3.689 5.495 10,141 531 4,222 5,432 3,053 1,546 34,109 2% 0cl02 3.770 5,704 10,328 541 , 4,380 5,465 3,140 1,584 34,912 2% Nov 02 3,759 6,011 10,411 532 4,444 5,372 3,139 1,492 35,160 1% I Dec 02 3,402 5,437 9,516 497 4,031 4.802 2,730 1,617 J 32,032 33,708 -9% 5% Jan 03 3.673 5,253 10,112 536 4,393 5,148 2,997 1,596 hangs 3 vs Dec 02 % Change Jan 03 vs Jan 02 • 8% -3% 6% 8% 9% 7% 10% 5% 3% 9% 0% 12% 7 360 -4% -12% 2% 1392% 4% 361 3000 Pd 2500--10 ./ ?534 2000- 53D- •( 1000 - San Bernardino Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Jan 02 reh Mat Apr flAY Jan 1d A Sep afe Sept Includes I- A Cowry Fn RRus 2915 nal WKendNerr • San Bernardino Line Sunday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips 362 Antelope Valley Line Saturday Service Average Dally Passenger Tnps Avg Daily Riders 3500 3600 2500 2000 1500 1000 Jan 02 Fen Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Oec Jan -0 Hot a Sapl 1adu,J a LA County Fair Fadersl Riverside Line Saturday Service Average Dady Passenger Tnps Avg Deily Riders 3500 3060'- 2500 2000 7500 1000 500 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0 Nav 0eo Jan -03 FHYr9 Sarnce ae99 ..t a 24 2aO - aauna Ddmnanued Jmntuy 19 20021 tQ 0301WIandnew • 363 • METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SUMMARY Percentage of Trains Arriving Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time LATEST 13 MONTHS Route =r VenturaCounty to Out Antelope Valley In Out San Bernardino. Ir1 Out Burbank Turns In Out Riversi a In out Grange Cburity' to Out . Inlaid Em /DG S4 No . RN/Fa/LA ' in Out Total System . In COOL Totaf . Jan 02 98% 99% 99% 100% 97% 96% 100% 99% 91% 85% 9745 94% 92% 95% 73% 9896 96% 96% 96%. Feb 02 98% 100% 97% 97% 97%- 97°% 99% 90% 95% 8176 919E 97% 90% 98% 85% 95% 95% 96% 96% Mar02 100% 99% 9795 94% 97% 97�r 99% 100%. 92% 94% 96% 96% 95% 954E BB% 98% 97% 96% 97% r Apr02 99% 10095 97% 93% 98% 95% 100% 99% 94% 98% 91% 96% 9756 94% 95% 95% 95% 96% 95% May 07 99% 97% 98% 98% 97% 96% 100% 98% 96% 92%. 89% 879E 87% 92% 87% 83% 95% 94% 94% Jun 02 99% 96% 96% 9996 98% 96% 99% 97% 951 97% 93% 96% 94% 90% 95% 90% 97% 96% 96% Jul 02 99% 99% 98% 95% 9876 99% 100% 99%. 9991 96% 91% 95% 93% 90% 92% 92% 97% 961/4 9076 Aug'02 100% 975 9996 96% 9646 91% 10076 99°% 9795 95% 6946 9196 92% 90% 91% 90% 96°6 94% 95% 5ep02 98% 99% 95% 94% 94% 91% 981 86% 9695 98% 65%r 92% 94% 84% 59% 92% 94% 93% 94% Oct 02 99% 9855 99% 99% 99% 95% 98% 95% 95% 95% 92% 95% 9396 93% 9295 95% 951 95% 96% Nov 02 99% 97% 98% 97% 94% 64% 1013% 99% 97% 9896 68% 89% 97% 95% 8645 94% 5475 93% 94% Dec 07 98% 971 96% 9796 97% 91% 99% 100%. 97% 97% 9696 97% 9056 9395 93% 96% 969E 95% 96% Jan 03 99% 98% B9% 89% 95% 85% 97% 97% 93% 97%. 94% 9796 90% 80% 92% 98% 94% 93% 93% Peak Psrlod Tams Arriving Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time run 93 VEN Ro Wu AVL Roure SW Route SUR Turns RIVF,oule OC'Rouhe. tat Empf]GRuite . RrvWFut/tA TotSotld Toe Qulbd Tor Syst emit. panW Trans 96% 981 92% 67% 95% 90% 98% 96% 94% 96% 9046 98% - 861 66% 89% 9875 93% 93% 93% No adjustments nave been made 10r relievable delays feminated trains are considered OT d they were on -time al point or lerminat,on An. d grains are not included in the on -tune calculehun • 11 0i 13MOHrm 364 CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS JANUARY 2003 PRIMARY CAUSE OF TRAIN DELAYS GREATER THAN 5 MINUTES CAUSE: YEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC 1NL10C RIFIL TOTAL °fin of TOT Signals/Detectors 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 5 2% Slow Orders/MOW 2 21 41 1 0 1 0 0 66 32'% Track/Switch 1 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 10 5°Jo Dispatching 0 0 3 0 3 5 3 2 16 S% Mechanical 0 3 1 0 1 1 2 0 6 4% Freight Train 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Amtrak Train 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1% Metrolink Meet/Turn 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1% Vandalism 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 2% Passenger(s) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0° SCRRA Hold Policy 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0" Other 3 27 16 5 4 7 22 6 90 44° TOTAL 6 58 66 7 13 19 27 9 205 100% 12 Saturday SNB 0 5 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Saturday AVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunday SNB 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0301GAUS • 365 FREQUENCY lCY OF TRAM DELAY BY DU F-: 'TgO I JANUARY 2003 ,MINUTES LATE: MEN 44111!- SNB BUR R1V OC 6EiOC RIIV«UL TOTAL % of TOT NO DELAY 403 418 334 225 236 359 224 168 2367 78.7% 1 MIN - 5 MIN 29 53 258 9 14 40 14 19 436 14.5% 6 MIN - 10 MIN 2 13 36 4 5 8 7 0 75 2.5% 11 MIN - 20 MIN 3 8 18 2 3 6 12 4 56 1.9% 21 M!N-30 MIN 0 13 4 0 1 1 3 2 24 0.8% GREATER THAN 30 MIN 1 24 8 1 4 4 5 3 50 1 7%! I ANNULLED 3 4 2 1 1 6 0 2 19 0.6% TOTAL TRAINS OPTD 438 529 658 241 263 418 265 196 3008 100%` TRAINS DELAYED >0 min 35 111 324 16 27 59 41 28 641 TRAINS DELAYED > 5 mi 6 58 66 7 13 19 27 9 205 6.8% 1;f 366 030IFREC Daily A ctivityl Report l;,il. 1si rF1'4cr ilk! r rllrf title r►111 Pjiilf M1 fl AlHir.“1/Pf 1 - Standard Procedures 1A -ROTC Staff on Site 1B - Customer Assistance 1C - Ambassador on Site 2 - Criminal Incidents 2A - Burglary 1 Theft / Vandalism 20 - Criminal Behavior 3 - Crisis Situations 3A - Medical / Fire Emergencies 4 - Maintenance/Repairs 4A - Lights 49 - TVM / Validator Machine 45 - TVM / Validator Machine 4C - Elevator 40 - Station Cleaning 40 - Station Cleaning 4E - Landscaping 4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 4G - Pepsi Vending 4H - Other 5 - Miscellaneous 5A - Miscellaneous Activity 6 - Parked Overnight - 6A - Parked Overnight T - Overflow - 7A - Veh In Overflow 9 - Empty Spaces • 9A - Empty Spaces 91 -RV'? Vehicles • 91A - R2R Vehicles flletr(IhnA S'trrlrullti Generaled from 1/UO3 to 1/31/03 fln•er%tde Pedley La Sierra W Corona N Coronet Total 1 0 0 0 4 5 33 31 31 30 31 156 29 1 5 5 13 53 Total 63 32 3e 35 48 214 Total 1 0 t 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 Total 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 14 5 3 4 7 33 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 8 8 8 1 39 12 8 5 12 D 37 1 9 2 4 1 17 1 0 0 I 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 3 Total 46 32 20 30 9 137 8 8 12 3 12 43 Tot.tl 8 9 12 3 12 43 22 3 0 6 5 44 Total 22 3 8 6 5 44 0 0 51 0 0 51 Total Total 0 51 0 0 51 61 0 0 298 0 359 61 0 0 298 0 359 7 1 6 2 3 19 Tnt.il 1 fi 2 3 19 * Value r+ averaged over the elate: until, flays Thursday February 20 2003 367 • • • Daily Activity Report • • • Ith• il�Ifr C(fi1 f 5 92 - Vehicles Parked • 92A - Vehicles Parked Metroltnit Stations Generated front 111/03 to 1/31/03 Rever.tde Pedler La Sierra W Corona N Corona Total 0 0 0 319 319 Tntal Q n D Q 319 319 * I{afuc e1 averaged over the data LNIrr dins T1arsda , rebrutra 20 2003 368 Trimpour.i. 't inrrwJrif r Riverside - Downtown Activity Detail Report Generated front 1/1/©3 to 1/31/03 Date Time Acatvity Log # Description Activity Type Activity Subtype 3`1 Vehicles 112012003 10 35am 66143 3 vehicles vandalized 2 • Criminal Incidents 2A - Burglary / Theft I Vendee 0 1/24/2003 2 1¢prn 66262 Man sutienng allergic reaction 3 - Cnsrs Srluabores 3A - Medical / Fire Emergence 0 1/24/2003 5 32pm 66263 'Woman fell off barn step, minor injury 3 - Crisis Srtuat<nns 3A - Medical / Fire Emergener 0 La Sierra Date Time Activity Log # Description Activltjr Tipe Activlry Subtype # Vehicles 1/20/2003 4 40pm 66149 Vehicle break-in 2 - Cnmpnal Incidents 2A - Burglary r Thefl 1 Vandalr 0 West Corona Date Tinte Activity Log # Description Activity Type Activity Serbtyn 2. Criminal Incidents 20 - Criminal Behavior 1/2912003 10 05am 56394 Corona Pa escort man, no arrest Thursday, February 20, 117113 # Vehicles 0 Page ! of 1 • • • 369 • AGENDA ITEM 7L • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: FROM: Riverside County Transportation Commission Budget and Implementation Committee Darren Kettle, Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update ►BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. EA CI(GRO UND INFORMATION: State Update Since the last meeting of the Commission that included a discussion of the Governor's proposed mid -year reductions for the 2002-03 Fiscal Year and the proposed 2003-04 Fiscal Year State Budget that has a total impact of $1.8 billion directly affecting transportation, the Legislature has acted on the Governor's proposals with general support for transportation and local government. The Senate and Assembly have rejected the Governor's request to suspend Proposition 42 in the current year and have deferred action on the major proposal to suspend the sales tax on gasoline transfer in FY 2003-04 and instead only took action on those items that were necessary for current year budget savings. Those items included: • Conversion of the proposed forgiveness of the scheduled General Fund repayment of $500 million to the Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) to a loan basis, with terms to extend out to 2006; • Restructured the Governor's proposed elimination of $90 million that had been scheduled in the current year for local streets and roads by applying $90 million from the action taken in the prior item to this purpose and passing on the remaining $10 million to the General Fund in the form of a loan; • Approved other minor actions, including a reversion of $5 million, transfer of $5.2 million in aeronautics funding to the General Fund, and adjusting by $15 million the amount Caltrans is obligated to pay for the general costs of state government. 370 Both regional and local transportation interests consider these actions by the Legislature as a relative short-term victory in that the majority of the Proposition 42 revenues and the TCRP have received a temporary stay of execution, at least until the Legislature's action on the 2003-04 State Budget. However, the caveat to this victory is that the actions referenced above were "double -joined" with legislation to raise Vehicle License Fees (VLF) to 1998 levels. The Governor has clearly stated his intent to veto the VLF measure, thus placing the actions related to Proposition 42 and the TCRP in legislative limbo. Federal Update Congress finalized the Federal 2002-03 Fiscal Year Budget and specifically the Omnibus Appropriations Act on Thursday, February 13, 2003. At the time of preparation of this item, the Conference Report for the Omnibus Appropriations Act was not yet available. However, one significant highlight of the act included setting the highway funding at $31 .8 billion, which is the identical amount of 2002 Federal Budget and over $4 billion higher than the Transportation Appropriations Bill reported out of the House back in December. The Administration's proposal for the reauthorization of TEA 21 has not yet been released, and what has become more disconcerting to transportation advocates is that the Administration has still not committed to a release date, leading many to contemplate seriously the notion that a reauthorization of TEA 21 may not occur until next year. However, the President's proposed 2004 Fiscal Year Transportation Budget does not show any growth in transportation funding over and above the standard growth included in TEA 21. This means that the Administration's proposal likely does not include any new revenues such as gas tax increases or user fees, which is inconsistent with proposals coming from House Transportation and infrastructure Committee Chairman Don Young (R -Alaska) who has publicly announced support for 2 cent per gallon per year for five years, increasing the total gas tax by 10 cents. • 371 • AGENDA ITEM 8 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Results of the Management Audit Specialists, Inc. of Transportation S TAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file the Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. (TSI); and, 2) Recommend that no Measure "A" Specialized Transit Funding be allocated to TSI in FY 2004. • • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In October 2002, the Commission directed staff to have a management audit of TSI conducted to resolve several issues including funding, match requirements, service areas and service levels. TSI has been the recipient of Measure "A" Specialized Transit Grant Funds for a number of years. However, during the last round of funding, several concerns were raised about TSI's service levels and productivity. Roy Glauthier of Transportation Planning and Policy was retained to conduct the management audit. The intent of the audit was to 1) conduct an analysis of system -wide operating and financial performance; 2) make recommendations to improve efficiency and effectiveness; and 3) assist the Commission in deciding whether to allocate Measure "A" Specialized Transit Funding in FY 2004. The following highlights the audit findings: 1) Revenues Versus Expenses: The basic issue for TSI is that current expenses exceed current revenues. During FY 2002, TSI's expenses have exceeded revenues by $135,526. Between July and the end of November 2002, TSI has incurred additional operating losses of $134,358, and, if projected straight-line through June 30, 2003, these losses will total over $479,000 for the past 18 months. To cover these operating losses, TSI has been using reserve funds. As of October 2002, TSI had 372 unrestricted reserves of approximately $238,000. If operating losses continue at the current rate of $33,400 per month, it is projected that TSI will exhaust its reserve funds in April 2003. 2) Operating Costs Exceeding Invoiced Revenues: TSI has a total of six significant service contracts plus several other minor contracts that produce only incidental revenues. However, many of these contracts operate at a loss. Following are two examples: inland Regional Center (IRC). According to TSI's records, services provided during July through September, 2002 cost approximately $166,048, however, the invoiced amount to IRC was $107,497 for this same period, representing a loss of $58,551; and b) Riverside Transit Agency (IOTA). Services operated in FY 2002 (through December 31, 2001) produced revenues totaling $535,813. However, according to the financial statements, the costs to operate the service was $556,976 resulting in a loss of $21,162. TSI's management has taken recent actions to eliminate services which were deemed to be unproductive or being operated at a loss (operating costs exceeding invoiced revenues). However, such efforts, while eliminating some operating costs, did little to reduce fixed costs, and simultaneously reduced revenues. In January 2003, TSI proposed a rate increase to IRC of 15 to 18% to address the issue of costs exceeding IRC reimbursement. Due to budget constraints at the State level, however, it does not appear that IRC will be able to increase their rates of reimbursement. IRC has verbally indicated that they may be able to assist TSI with the increased costs of vehicle insurance and workers' compensation insurance. 3) Funding: With the exception of Measure "A" Grant Funding from RCTC, TSI exists on "fee for service" contracts, in which compensation is directly related to the provision of specific services_ Over the past 18 months, several major service contracts were not renewed with TS1 as a result • • • 373 • • of competitive public bidding. Since January 1, 2002, TSI hasceased operation of contracted transportation services which produced total annual revenues of almost $947,000 or 54% of its revenue. For the past 25 years, Local Transportation Funds were provided to TSI to cover trips that RTA was unable to provide due to either: a) The request for travel was out of RTA's service area; or b) The passenger, due to a medical condition, needed a higher level of service than RTA was able to provide.. That funding source was terminated at the end of FY 2002 due to RTA's expanded service area. 4) Additional Revenue/Strategic Initiatives: During the past 12 months, there have been only small contracts added by TSI with little impact on the revenue gap. In addition, no strategic initiatives have been undertaken to define the mission and business of TSI in a manner which would return the organization to financial health. 5) Staffing/Administrative Overhead: Based on discussions with staff and observation of the operations and administration of TSI, the auditor was left with the impression of an organization and staff which is managing to keep daily services on the road, but which has little depth of understanding of how to address the operational and organizational issues they face. Additionally, they have little time to undertake solutions to deal with the issues. Staff appear to be carrying out their jobs to the best of theft abilities and performing adequately, but it is not clear that they have received training needed to properly use the software they have available to them nor do they have a fundamental understanding of their jobs to address issues which are outside of normal parameters. 6) Development of Business Opportunities: To be successful, most non-profit organizations must continually develop business opportunities and pursue grant funding and government contracts. However, none of TSI's primary staff have experience with the management of private, non-profit corporations, the development of grant or funding applications, or fund 374 development, These are essential skills in paid staff positions, and to some extent, the experience of the board. The Management Audit was mailed to TSI's Executive Director and Board on January 23, 2003. Both consultant staff and Commission staff attended TSI's board meeting on February 1 1 , 2003 to provide an overview of the audit results and answer questions. At the time that this agenda item was written, TSI had not prepared a written response to the Management Audit. The Management Audit presents 39 recommendations for the improvement of TSI's administration, operations and reporting. The above issues and findings were extracted from the audit report as staff deemed them to be most critical in assisting the Commission in making future funding recommendations. Given the current business environment at TSI, staff is not recommending Measure "A" Specialized Transit Funding in FY 2004. Attachment: Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc, • • 375 AANSPORTRTION SPECIALISTS, INC. February 2i, 2003 63320 LOCEOWE a FEB 2 4 2003 Tanya Love, Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mrs. Love: RIVERSDECQUNTY TRANSPORTAT ON COM SSION' On behalf of President Norton Younglove and the Board of Directors 1 am providing the following clarifications, comments and responses to recommendations contained in the Riverside County Transportation Commission's draft Management Audit Report of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page i, Audit Findings, Organization: The statement that "There is no long-range plan....nor has there been any recognition of the need for a short-range business development plan" is a mischaracterization of what has occurred. While at present there is no formally adopted long-range plan, TS1's focus since May of 2002 has been centered on short-range issues and concerns including efforts to retain and or regain funding sources, the search for new and alternative funding, identifying operational issues, controlling costs and realigning services in response to cut backs. The short-range business plan has been one of survival while maintaining and redefining services. Page i, Audit Findings, Funding: Comment: Two major contracts were not renewed as the result of competitive bidding. Both were with RTA. Page ii, Audit Findings, Services & Programs: Comment: The statement "operations have declined in passengers and operating performance over the past eighteen months" may offer a misleading characterization of the present situation. Historical ridership data appears to have been overstated in some cases making valid comparisons difficult at best. Comparisons of other operating data (hours, miles) may also be skewed due to differences in data definitions and understanding of what was to be reported (revenue versus total miles and hours). Ridership has clearly decreased as TSI ceased reporting Inland Regional Center clients as part of the South County project. Ridership has also declined as the result of reductions in service hours in response to funding cutbacks. Formerly Mediirans Services 6458 Industrial Avenue • Riverside, CA 92504 (909) 358-9175 • Fax (909) j r -9178 • TDD (909) 358-9176 T.25.02.09 • Scheduling and dispatch "techniques" are in large part dictated and limited by the software program (Scooter) currently used by TSI. Staff skills are more than adequate to the task. Page ii, Recommendations, Item 4. Revisit Services Oualifvinz For Local Transportation Funding: Comment: TSI does not expect funding "upon request" and has in fact offered the outline of a plan that would serve legitimate needs and support the goals of improved regional mobility related to the transportation of subscription clients (IRC, adult day care, etc) currently using RTA services. We believe this concept has considerable merit and warrants further exploration. Page 1, OVERVIEW OF TSI MAMAGEMENT AUDIT, ORIGINS OF THIS AUDIT: Comment: Second bullet point; a significant portion of the financial losses experienced subsequent to July 1, 2002.were the direct result of TSI's good faith efforts to continue providing service to South County residents while discussions took place concerning LTF funding. TSI continued to meet service requests but did not receive any further funding support. Page 2, SECTION 1: ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW RECOMMNEDATION: Correct Agent For Service with California Secretary of State by filing a revised Form SO -100, Statement By domestic Nonprofit Corporation. Response: Completed. RECOMMENDATION: Delete all references to "Meditrans" name on informational materials to cease the use of this name and to eliminate client confusion. Response: Recommendation will be incorporated in all future activities. RECOMMENDATION: Review and revise Bylaws to reflect current Articles of Incorporation and administrative practices. Response: Bylaws will be reviewed and revised as recommended. RECOMMENDATION: Amend Bylaws to institute specific terms for Directors and Officers. Response: Bylaws will be reviewed and revised as appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: Consider placing a limit on terms of officers to encourage new leadership. Response: Bylaws will be reviewed and revised as appropriate. • • 77 • RECOMMENDATION: Create a Corporate Binder to organize and safe guard important corporate documents. Response: Important Corporate documents are currently locked in a fire -retardant safe. Page 5, Governance: RECOMMENDATION: Aggressively recruit and elect new Directors to the TSI Board and Consider increasing the number of directors to spread governance responsibilities.. Response: Process is of recruiting new members currently in progress. RECOMMENDATION: • Establish a rgular day and time for Board Meeting and publish a meeting calendar at the start of each fiscal year. Response: A Board Meeting Calendar will be established as recommended. • ▪ Amend the Bylaws to require an Annual Meeting. Specify that elections will take place at this meeting. Response: Historically, TSI does in fact conduct an Annual Meeting at which new members are installed and officers elected. The Board will consider amending the Bylaws as recommended to formalize the process. RECOMMENDATION: • Develop and institute a monthly Board Report to keep Directors and Officers current on organizational performance, administration and potential issues. Response: Development of such a report was in progress prior to the audit and will be a standard portion of the Board agenda. • Institute an annual report summarizing the TSI mission. programs, finances and performance. Response: Recommendation will be implemented as suggested. RECOMMENDATION: • Ensure that Board Minutes and attached documentation are maintained and safeguarded in a Minute Binder. Response Minutes and attached documentation are maintained in individual files, one for each meeting, and filed chronologically. Consideration will be given to use of Minute Binders. S78 • Ensure that Minutes are drafted immediately following Board Meetings to facilitate greatest accuracy_ Response: Board Meetings are now recorded and minutes are typed as soon as possible to maximize accuracy. • Require signing of Minutes by Corporation Secretary/Treasurer. Response. Historically this has been the practice, however consistency has been lacking. The recommendation will implemented as suggested. Page 8, Long -Range or Strategic Planning RECOMMENDATION: • Develop a basic Strategic Plan for TSI, including input from funding agencies and community agencies and partners: • Ensure that this Plan begins with clarifying the organization's purpose and mission: • Share this Strategic Plan with TSI staff, funding agencies and community agencies. Response: A strategic planning process will be implemented as recommended. Page 8, Organization and Staffing, Organization Comment: Staffing was not reduced further as the result of the loss of the RTA contract on January I, 2002. However, prior to that date a decision was made not to fill the positions of Training Manger, Contract Supervisor, Accounting Manager and Administrative Assistant. The Operations Manager's position was also not filled after her resignation in April of 2002. Effective February 21, 2003 TSI Operations Supervisor position will be vacant and left unfilled until service levels are expanded. As recently noted by RCTC's auditor on this project, administrative staffing levels are now at point that little if any benefit could be achieved with further reductions. The general introduction of the Job Descriptions for the Dispatch Supervisor and Operations Supervisor are nearly identical. However the details under Qualifications and Duties & Responsibilities are very different. The Organizational Chart reflects the size of the organization and the necessity of overlapping responsibilities. Communications amongst staff are such that little if any confusion exists to lines of authority and job requirements. RECOMMENDATION: • Revise organization chart to clarify lines of authority. • Revise Job Descriptions to more correctly describe their respective task and responsibilities. 379 • Response: See Comments above. TS! will endeavor to further clarify the organizational chart and Job Descriptions. Page 9, Figure 1 Transportation specialists, Inc.., Organizational Chart Correction. The Executive Directors name is spelled "Viler" Page 10, Staffing Comment: Characterizing TSI staff as having "no depth of understanding of how to address the operational and organizational issues" is unfair and untrue. Time on site simply did not allow for such analysis and it is difficult to understand how this conclusion could be reached given the limited depth of this audit. While the TSI staff will benefit from continued training they are more than capable of dealing with the operational and organizational issues that routinely confront the organization. Prior to the hiring of a new Executive Director, existing staff played a only limited role in many administrative activities and had little insight or say into operational issues. Loss key personnel in FY 2002 left little in the way of formal processes and documentation requiring a great deal to assumption and guesswork of the remaining staff. It should also be noted that while the current Executive Director has limited background in the management of private, nonprofit organizations he has significant experience (30 years) in operations, the management of public "nonprofits", management and development of contracted services as well as funding, capital and special projects grants preparation. RECOMMENDATION: ■ Identify training opportunities, which would enable existing staff to gain needed knowledge to improve performance in their existing positions. • When opportunities arise in seeking new staff or new Directors seek individuals with experience in the management ofprivate nonprofit corporations and specialized areas of expertise such as grant writing and fund development. • Review and revise staff lob descriptions to add needed functional areas and job tasks with commensurate requirements for experience and education. Response: TSI will incorporate recommendations as suggested. Page 12, Contract Review Correction: Third paragraph "$2730 per VSH-1 for the Friends of Moreno Valley". Page 17, Paster Donations Versus Fares RECOMMENDATION: • Consider limiting use of 0 on A senior subsidy to the Jurupa Senior Shuttle and instituting passenger fares on the InterLINK services to increase passenger revenues. 5 380 Response: The Office on Aging Title Ill contract requires that funding be applied to several "target area groups" (TAGS) throughout western Riverside County. TSI will explore potential of focusing subsidies to a specific TAG with the Office on Aging. • Increase marketing of 3urupa Shuttle and the community fixed route features of this program to increase efficiency and ridershi . Response: TS1 will incorporate recommendations as suggested. Page 21, Jurupa Valley Senior Shuttle Comment: The .lurupa Valley Senior Shuttle is a route deviation by design and provides curb -to -curb service to minimize the distances seniors must carry groceries. Service design assisted greatly by input from local seniors, the senior center and district Supervisors Office. Page 22, Operational Data, Operating Data Comments: It should be noted TS1 staff was first to raise concerns regarding the availability, consistency and accuracy of operating data. Data problems stem primarily from the version of the scheduling database, Scooter, which is outdated and poorly supported. Financial constraints prevent TSI from updating the software at this time. Staff efforts are focused on improving the accuracy of the data and generating a useful composite format. Individual route summaries are routinely run by the fifth working day of the following month, however, data must then been reviewed against manifests and corrected, a very time consuming effort. Note: TS1 experienced a major computer system crash and data loss (August and September 2002) when Scooter representatives attempted a remote upgrade of the scheduling software. This required staff to reenter data or manually compile reports, which resulted in a domino effect for October and November data. RECOMMENDATION: • Ensure preparation of monthly operating data on a timely basis following the close of each month: • Organize and maintain computer records for easy access; • Maintain paver report copies in binder files by year; • Archive operating data and records for com feted fiscal ears awa from active work areas. Response: Implementation of these recommendations are in progress. 381 • RECOMMENDATION: • Redesign driver manifests to provide additional space for data entry and for recording events which take the vehicle out of service place the into another route or switch vehicles in the middle of a service run. Response: Redesign of manifests is software driven and will be implemented as time and budget allow. However adjustments are being made and drivers are being trained during monthly meetings regarding the recording of data on existing manifests. • Train drivers on importance of accurate data recording to reduce the incidence of illegible entries and incomplete record keeping Response: Recommended activity has been ongoing since May 2002. • Record computations on manifests and forms during reconciliation and data entry to facilitate double-checking computations and easy audit of data process. Response: Data is managed as recommended. RECOMMENDATION: • Utilize proper definitions of Vehicle Service Hours and Miles: • Verify and recomputed, if needed, Vehicle Service Hours and Miles at least back to July 2002 using correct data definitions for Vehicle Service Hours and Miles. Response: TS1 will incorporate recommendations as suggested. RECOMMENDATION: • Establish a single set of operating data records for use whenever reporting is required. • Ensure that amended reports are submitted to all monitoring agencies when corrections are made to data. • Conduct further investigation into cash deposit records to determine actual donation amounts for audited months. Response: TS1 will incorporate recommendations as suggested. Page 26, Donation 1 -candling Procedures Comment: The impression that TSI drivers open donation envelopes and consolidate the donations is erroneous. Drivers return the sealed envelopes to TSI offices opening and counting under dual control custody. Previously South County drivers at remote park out locations were permitted to open an envelope to purchase oil to an "emergency" situation. RECOMMENDATION: Ensure that donation envelopes are sealed when collected by the drivers and remain sealed until counted under 2 -person control in the TSI offices. 7 382 Response: TSI drivers are instructed to accept only sealed donation envelopes are not permitted to open donations. Donations are counted under 2 -person control at the TSI offices. Page 29, South LooD/1ntrLlNK Service Comment: The second paragraph of this section indicates that the productivity of South County services suffered a marked decline from FY 00/01 to FY 01102, possibly as a result of changes in TSI scheduling staff. The current staff has proven more than capable of effectively scheduling and managing the volume of service being requested and we believe it unlikely that a transition to new personnel contributed to the prolonged decline in ridership and productivity. We feel very strongly that the declines experienced during the period in question were a product of competition for labor (drivers) and resources as TSI attempted to balance the management of its own "core" services with that of the much larger and more complicated services operated for RTA under contract. Staff present during this period has noted that there were seldom enough drivers available and resources were frequently pulled from South County and IRC operations to cover RTA contract obligations. Financial statements and records of overtime hours from this time period support this observation. IRC routes were often doubled up creating extremely long ride times and buses and drivers were pulled from South Loop and InterLINI( service to cover RTA trips while TSI trips were cancelled or relegated to longer wait and travel times. The net results were alienated passenger, declining productivity and a loss in total ridership numbers. This problem was exacerbated by an absence of marketing efforts. As noted elsewhere in these responses there are clear indications that at least some of the reported ridership statistics were overstated during these earlier periods. The reporting of more accurate ridership as opposed to overstated figures may have also contributed to the apparent decline or turn around in productivity An additional contributing factor may be also that TSI inadvertently began reporting total miles and hours rather "revenue" or service miles and hours as noted in the audit report. While as yet unclear as to the precise time frame that this change took place it appears that it may have started at about the time TSI began experience staff turn over in early FY 01/02. Page 34, Overall TSI Performance RECOMMENDATION: • Ensure proper data definitions are adhered to for all transportation services operated bv. TS1; Response: TSI will ensure that proper and consistent data definitions are applied to all services. • Develo and im lement a ro ram of o erational im rovements to shore u current transportation services. 8 • • 383 • Response: TSI constantly reviews services and operating methods in an effort to identify and implement opportunities for improvement. If you have any questions regarding these comments, clarification and responses please do hesitate to contact me at your convenience. • • Stephen C. 01ler Executive Director cc: Norton Younglove, President Board of Directors 9 384 ATTACHMENT 1 ADDITION TO AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 Management Audit. Report on Transportation Specialists, Inc. Conducted For The Riverside County Transportation Commission By Roy E. Glauthier. Transportation Planning & Policy Costa Mesa, California January 2003 Management Audit Report Table of Contents Page No. Executive Summary Overview .. 1 Origin Of This Audit 1 Conduct of Audit 1 Section 1: Organizational Overview 2 Corporate Organization 2 Review of Articles or incorporation and Bylaws 2 Governance 5 Long -Range or Strategic Planning 8 Organization and Staffing 8 The Bottom Line: Organization 11 Section 2: Funding Source Review 12 Overview 12 Contract Review . _ 12 Funding Source Review 14 The Bottom Line: Funding 18 Section 3: Analysis of Services and Programs 19 Overview 19 Review of Transportation Services 19 Operational Data 22 Review of Service Performance 28 The Bottom Line: Services & Programs . . . 34 Section 4: Audit Analysis and Findings . . . . 35 Overview 35 Revenues Versus Expenses 35 Management Response To Operating Losses 37 Project Expenses Versus Billings 38 What Do These Analyses Tell Us? 41 How About Quick Fixes? Measure A and LTF 42 What's Needed To keep TS! Afloat? 42 Section 5: Audit Recommendations 44 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Recreating And Reinvigorating TSI . . . 44 Operational and Administrative Recommendations . . . 46 Management Audit Report Table of Contents - Continued Pam Fi ores 9 1 TSI Organization Chart 39 2 TSI Historical Productivity Tables 13 1 Summary of Transportation Specialist Contracts 2 Operating Fund Sources By Year 13 15 3 Summary of TSl Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2520 4 Results of Data Review 5 Comparison of ROTC Measure A and RTA LTF Reports 27 6 Perform 30-317 Performance Measures _ 7 Financial Analysis: Annual Expense & Revenue Totals 336 8 Financial Analysis: Allocation of Expenses . . . . . . 9 Financial Analysis: Cost Allocation Model . Appendices A Operating Data, July 1998 Through September 2002 Management Audit Report Executive Summary Origin of this Audit Based on the results of its own staff investigations and discussions with T Sl management, this Management Audit was made a condition of funding by the Riverside County Transportation Commission in its FY02/03 allocation of Measure A funds to Transportation Specialists. The intent of this audit was to conduct a thorough analysis of systemwide operating and financial performance and to make recommendations to improve effectiveness, efficiency and/or compliance with Commission and other requirements, Audit Findings Organization Although Transportation Specialists has a solid reputation as a transportation provider based on past performance, immediate attention to needed to its mission in the transportation arena and its current direction as an organization. There is no long-range plan for the organization's future nor has there been any recognition of the need for a short-range business development plan to respond to the loss of more than half its contract revenues during the 2001/02 year. Present leadership of the organization needs to be expanded through an aggressive recruitment of new Directors, however, this will only be successful in conjunction with a rededicated purpose to this organization. Improved communications to the Board in terms of reporting content and timeliness will serve to more effectively involve the Board in a more immediate and consistent manner in the organization's operations and will give the Directors a better basis for establishing policy and direction. Funding With the exception of Measure A grant support from ROTC, Transportation Specialists exists presently on "fee for service" contracts, in which compensation is directly related to the provision of specific services. Over the past 18 months, several major service contracts were not renewed with TSI as a result of competitive public bidding, which reduced total annual revenues by 54% from their high-water mark in FY00/01. Further, this same period saw termination of Local Transportation funding from the Riverside Transit Agency, eliminating a general subsidy for the transportation provided by TSI in the South County and Jurupa Valley. During the past 12 months, there have been only small contracts added by TSI, with little impact on this revenue gap. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page i Services & Programs Transportation Specialists operations have declined in passengers and operating performance over the past 18 months. Actions are needed to improve scheduling and dispatch techniques, to increase demand for services and to increase the opportunities for delivery of increased trips with the same resources. These actions can result in improved performance of existing services and protection of these contracts, preventing further loss of service contracts and revenues. Overall Findings • Since January 1, 2002, TSI has ceased operation of contracted transportation services which produced total annual revenues of almost $947,000 during FY00/01 out of a total organizational budget of $1.73M; • Beginning early in FY01/02, TSI incurred monthly operating losses which, through June 30, 2002, totaled $135,526. From July 1 through November 30, 2002, these losses have amounted to an additional $134,358; and • Based on reported unrestricted reserves of about $238,000 as of October 2002, TSI would exhaust its reserve funds in April 2003 if operating losses continued at the rate of November 2002; and • If corrective actions are not taken by July 1, 2003, TSI will cease to be financially viable and consideration must be given to dissolving the organization. Recommendations This audit report presents five over-riding recommendations aimed at addressing the crucial financial issues facing Transportation Specialists. Quite briefly, these are: 1. Redefine TSI's Focus and Business Model — TS1 needs to decide where it will focus its efforts — with particular attention to transportation needs which are not well -served by public transit or by for-profit providers and on services which government will support; 2. Reestablish TSI's Corporate Leadership — the TSI Board needs to be expanded and to take a stronger, more active role in defining the organization's direction and helping to develop the plans for achieving its goals; 3. Develop Strategic Partnerships For Corporate Direction & Service Provision — TSI should involve its funding agencies and service clients in the development of the organization's strategic direction and delivery of services; 4. Revisit Services Qualifying For Local Transportation Funding — Reinstatement of LTF represents one of the few sources of funding which can be realized in the very short-term. However, TSI cannot expect RTA or RCTC to simply provide funding upon request, TSI must present legitimate service needs and effective plans for providing responsive services in order to gain funding support; and Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page i i 5. Find What Works, Then Expand It — TSV"s most successful present service might be the Jurupa Senior Shuttle: this service suffers reportedly from lack of passenger capacity and is supported by RCTC and RTA as it effectively meets trip needs which otherwise would fall on the Jurupa Dial -A -Ride. The Jurupa Shuttle might constitute a mod& to be applied elsewhere in the county as TSI develops new services and programs. The audit report also presents 39 recommendations for the improvement of TSI administration, operations and reporting. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page i ll OVERVIEW OF TSI MANAGEMENT AUDIT ORIGIN OF THIS AUDIT Based on the results of its own staff investigations and discussions with TSI management, this Management Audit was made a condition of funding by the Riverside County Transportation Commission in its FY02/03 allocation of Measure A funds to Transportation Specialists. The intent of this audit was to conduct a thorough analysis of systemwide operating and financial performance and to make recommendations to improve effectiveness, efficiency and/or compliance with Commission and other requirements. The context of this Management Audit, however, presents a much more immediate set of concerns than indicated by the above project description: • Since January 1, 2002, TSI has ceased operation of contracted transportation services which produced total annual revenues of almost $947,000 during FY00/01 out of a total organizational budget of $1.73M; and • Beginning early in FY01/02, TSI incurred monthly operating losses which, through June 30, 2002, totaled $135,526. From July 1 through November 30, 2002, these losses have amounted to an additional $134,358. CONDUCT OF AUDIT This management audit has been done with the assistance of TSI management and staff and in consultation with staff of the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The consultant has met a number of times with the TSI Executive Director, Steve 01ler, as well as with the President of the TSI Board, Norton Younglove and, by telephone, Director Jean Koenig. Additionally, we have met with TSI's accountant, Stephen Bishop. This audit is based on these interviews plus operating and financial records obtained from TSI and ROTC, limited observation of TSI administrative and operations activities, and review of financial and operating source records where available and appropriate. It should be noted that gaps appear in some of the historical data where records were not available. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 1 SECTION 1: ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW Corporate Organization Originally incorporated as Meditrans Services on May 22, 1973, under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, this California Corporation changed its name on January 20, 1998 to Transportation Specialists, Inc. According to the California Secretary of State's office, Transportation Specialists, Inc. is an active corporation, meaning that all annual filings with the State are current. The next biennial filing to the State will be a Statement By Domestic Nonprofit Corporation [50-100], which will be due by the end of May 2003. A review of the Corporate information available through the Secretary of State's website [www.ss.ca.gov] did find that the Agent for Service of Process for Transportation Specialists is still listed as the former Executive Director, Judylynn Gries. This agent should be changed at the earliest convenience, which can be done by submitting an amended Statement By Domestic Nonprofit Corporation. [A copy of this form has already been provided to TSI for submission of this change.] Recommendation: Correct Agent For Service with California Secretary of State by filing a revised form SO -100, Statement By Domestic Nonprofit Corporation. Review of Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws Articles of Incorporation Articles of Incorporation generally follow a standard format, which is seen in the Articles for this organization. A comment is warranted regarding the statement of purpose of the organization as it appears in these Articles, particularly as one outcome of this management audit may be a revisiting of the corporation's mission and activities. When incorporated in 1973, the Second Article stated that the purpose of Meditrans "...is to provide free transportation to and from health care and health related service facilities to those in need thereof and who are unable to furnish their own transportation." Obviously, this purpose statement limited Meditrans in the type of transportation services it could operate and prohibited the charging of any passenger fare for Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 2 those services. At some point, the Articles were revised to remove these restrictions on Meditrans' activities, by restating this Second Article to read: "The purpose for which this corporation is formed are (sic): (a) The specific and primary purpose is to provide transportation related services to those in need." While this revision was dearly aimed at allowing Meditrans to provide a range of transportation services, there is no documentation in the corporate records that these revised Articles of Incorporation were ever filed with the Secretary of State. In any event, the Articles were amended on January 20, 1998, for the principal purpose of changing the name of the organization from Meditrans to "Transportation Specialists, inc." thus removing the "medical" connotation of the Meditrans name. Along with effecting this name change, the January 1998 Amended Articles of Incorporation significantly shortened the Articles from those of 1973, removing, for example, any reference to the number of directors the corporation should have. More important, however, might be that these 1998 Amended Articles further restated the purpose of the organization to be: "The specific purpose for which the Corporation is organized is limited to providing transportation related services to those in need." [underline added] It might be noted that, although the organization's name was changed in 1998 to Transportation Specialists, the organization keeps the old "Meditrans" name alive by including it on the face of many of its information materials ["Formerly Meditrans"], This practice should be stopped as it simply adds to confusion over the organization's present name and continues the use of a name over which TSI has no ownership or control. Recommendation: Delete all reference to "Meditrans" name on information materials to cease the use of this name and to eliminate client confusion. Corporate Bylaws The Bylaws of any corporation provide the internal organization and rules by which decisions will be made. They are adopted and may be amended in this case by the vote or written consent of a majority of the directors of the corporation. Bylaws dated 1978 and 1988 were located in the corporate files of TSI. No changes have apparently been made to these Bylaws since 1988, however, it Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 3 might be suggested that these Bylaws need to be reviewed and revised to correct the address for the corporation which is listed at "2060 University Avenue," to reconcile the Bylaws with the current Articles of Incorporation and to correct a number of other outdated or confusing sections. Recommendation Review and revise Bylaws to reflect current Articles of Incorporation and_ administrative practices. Several issues should be noted in the Bylaws related to the number and tenure of directors and officers of the corporation. First, regarding the number of directors, the Bylaws specify the number of Directors for the corporation as `'. .. nine initially, but that number may be increased to not exceeding twenty-one upon the vote of two-thirds of the Directors then in office."[Article 3.01] There is no indication that the number of directors has ever been increased from nine, however, it is clear that nine is the minimum number of directors the organization should have at any time. Related to this, the Bylaws do not contain any specific tenure or term for directors or officers, in either case, directors or officers shall serve from the time they are elected until the next annual election of directors or officers or until their successors are elected, This language produces a situation in which qualified individuals may not wish to stand as directors or officers as it appears they would be taking on a commitment with no end -date. With the personal and business commitments most individuals face and the number of opportunities which exist for volunteer participation, it may be unreasonable to expect individuals to agree to such an open-ended commitment. Recommendation: Amend Bylaws to institute specific terms for Directors and Officers. There may also be value to placing a specific term of office on the corporation's officers, possibly including a limit in the number of consecutive terms, so as to encourage a periodic change in leadership without requiring any individual to commit to an unlimited term of office. This is not an action to be taken lightly, however, since term limits can also preclude the continuation of committed leadership. Recommendation: Consider placing a limit on terms of officers to encourage new leadership.. Finally, Article 3.09 requires that "Directors who fail to attend three Board meetings in a row without giving prior notice will be automatically dropped from Board membership." This clause will be addressed below. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 4 Maintenance and Protection of Corporate Records Our review of the Corporate records found that the Articles of Incorporation, Amended Articles and Bylaws are presently maintained in a file folder with no particular organization. Certified originals and multiple photocopies are mixed together and there is no protection of these important corporate records. We would suggest that a Corporate Binder be created with separate sections for the Articles, Bylaws and Biennial Filings, that these documents be filed in reverse chronological order [most current version on top] and that this binder be appropriately safeguarded. Recommendation: Create a Corporate Binder to organize and safeguard important Corporate Documents. Governance The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws specify how a corporation is to be organized and administered, "Governance" considers how this actually takes place, Directors Transportation Specialists presently has nine members on its Board of Directors, which corresponds to the minimum number specified in its Bylaws. According to the Minutes of the Board Meetings, however, at least two members have attended no meetings in the past year and four directors have missed at least 3 or more meetings in a row during this period [although we cannot determine if they gave prior notice of these absences]. Pursuant to Article 3.09 cited above, it appears that some of the present TSI Directors might be subject to being dropped from the Board for attendance. In fact, dropping any of the present Board would exacerbate an apparent problem in obtaining a quorum at meetings of the Board — at least 3 meetings had to continued during the past year for lack of a 4 -Director quorum. The appearance is that TSI needs new and more Directors on its Board to spread the responsibilities of establishing policy and setting direction for the organization and to bring new perspectives and ideas to the Board process. At present, for example, management has indicated that the Board does not use any committees since there are so few active Directors. This requires that all active Directors be involved in all aspects of the organization's direction, rather than dividing these responsibilities among the group. While the identification and recruitment of new Directors is the responsibility of the Nominating Committee — which appears to be inactive -- in reality, it must be Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 5 the responsibility of all members of this Board due to its relatively small size. It might be noted that the Nominating Committees in many organizations include individuals who are not presently officers or Board members, and this might be considered by TSI as a means of broadening involvement in the governance of the corporation, particularly by agencies or individuals who choose not to take a position on the Board. Recommendation: Aggressively recruit and elect new Directors to the TS! Board and consider increasing the number of Directors to spread governance responsibilities. Meetings The Bylaws specify that the Board will meet at least four times a year at a time and place specified by the President. Management has indicated that these Board Meetings are usually held on a Wednesday in the middle of the month, however there is no set schedule for meetings — e.g. the 2nd Wednesday of each month. Interestingly, the 1988 Bylaws do not require an Annual Meeting of the Board nor do they specify when election of Directors or Officers will take place. To facilitate meeting planning and for the convenience of Directors and Officers, it is recommended that Board meetings be set on a regular schedule and a meeting calendar be published at the start of each fiscal year. We would also recommend that the Bylaws be amended to require an annual meeting of the Board, specify when this will be held and that election of Directors and Officers will take place at this meeting. Recommendations: • Establish a regular day and time for Board Meetings and publish a meeting calendar at the start of each fiscal year. • Amend the Bylaws to require an Annual Meeting. Specify that elections will take place at this meeting. Board Oversight of Corporation On a regular basis, the Board should meet to review the operations and administration of the corporation in order to establish direction, set policy and take action on necessary corporate business. To enable the Board to have the proper information and understanding to conduct their business, it is necessary that the Directors and Officers receive regular reports of the organization's performance, administrative activities, financial status and such. Importantly, these regular reports also become part of the corporate records and documentation. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 6 In our review of TSI's corporate records and meeting documentation, we have found a prepared "Executive Director's Report" dated June 5, 2002, and another informal report to the Board from the Executive Director and have been told that the Board is provided with the monthly financial reports. So that Directors and Officers become familiar with TS1's operations and activities and remain updated even if they cannot attend a meeting or a meeting must be cancelled, a monthly Board Report needs to be developed and distributed monthly to the Board, whether or not a meeting will be held. This monthly report need not be lengthy or exhaustive, but needs to provide Directors and Officers with an overview of TSI's performance and finances and should provide a summary of administrative, management, staffing, equipment or facility issues. This report should also identify any future planning issues that the Board will need to address. Equally important for a nonprofit organization that is established for charitable purposes is that its reports and policies be set up and maintained in a manner which will attract and keep donors and sponsor organizations. Recommendations: • Develop and institute a monthly Board Report to keep Directors and Officers current on organizational performance, administration and potential issues. • Institute an annual report summarizing the TSI's mission, programs, finances and performance. Meeting Minutes and Documentation Our review of documentation found that a binder exists with copies of Meeting Minutes from July 2001 through June 2002 — that is, for FY 01/02 , but that staff has not continued this practice of collecting Board Meeting documentation into a binder for the current year. In addition, as of our review on December 6, the minutes of the November 12 meeting had not been dratted, a delay which increases the difficulty of developing accurate minutes. Lastly, our review found that the Minutes of the TSl Board are not being signed by the Corporate Secretary/Treasurer, which should be required in accord with Robert Rules of Order and to ensure that the Secretary/Treasurer is approving the minutes once they are prepared by staff. Recommendations: • Ensure that Board Minutes and attached documentation are maintained and safeguarded in a Minute Binder; • Ensure that Minutes are drafted immediately following Board Meetings to facilitate greatest accuracy; • Require signing of Minutes by Corporate Secretary/Treasurer. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc, Page 7 Long -Range or Strategic Planning Only one document has been identified which attempts to define a long-term or strategic direction for TSI, this being a Strategic Plan developed as a result of a two-day planning workshop on March 31 and April 1, 2000. The participants in this workshop, other than the two facilitators, were 5 Directors and the 3 primary staff of TS1 at that time. Unfortunately, of these eight individuals, only 3 of the Directors remain on the Board and all 3 staff have left the organization. From discussions with two members of the TSI Board, we learned that only a few recommendations made in this April 2000 Strategic Plan were implemented and that the Plan has been largely forgotten and has not been shared with Directors joining the TSI Board after that time. While it is difficult to determine the impetus for the planning effort which produced this April 2000 Plan and some of the visions in this plan may not apply today, this Plan should be used as the starting point for a definition of TSI's mission and objectives through development of a practical and achievable strategic plan. Without the direction and assignment of responsibilities which are found in such a plan, this organization will continue to address day-to-day issues with no sense of long-term direction and there will be little shared sense of purpose among the staff and 'leadership. Recommendations: • Develop a basic Strategic Plan for TSI, including input from funding agencies and community agencies and partners; • Ensure that this Plan begins with clarifying the organization's purpose and mission; • Share this Strategic Plan with TSI staff, funding agencies and community agencies_ Organization and Staffing Organization The TSI organization, as depicted in Figure 1, TSI Organization Chart, is relatively straightforward, as would be expected with a fleet of only 20 vehicles. It might be noted, though, that the number of vehicles being operated was reduced by half - from a total of approximately 35 - effective January 1, 2002, yet there were no reductions in administrative and management staff. In considering the organizational chart for TS1, it may be noticed that both the Transportation Supervisor and the Dispatch Supervisor are shown as having supervisory responsibility for the Route Drivers. This situation is also seen in the Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 8 Figure 1 Transportation Specialists, Inc, Organizational Chart BOARD OF DIRECTORS Norton Youngk ve President ACCOUNTING/HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATOR Deena Barrett EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Stephen C. alert CLERK/DRIVER Cindy Churchill i TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISOR Mikel Baker DISPATCH SUPERVISOR Susie Kong 1 MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR FM Station ROUTE DRIVERS Staff of 20 Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 9 job descriptions for these two positions, in that both positions have exactly the same description, with the exception of their respective job title: "Under the supervision of the Executive Director, the [job title] will be responsible for supervision of daily operational activities, routes, drivers and vehicles." It is true that these two job positions must exercise joint control over service delivery, yet the responsibilities of these positions are quite different and are not properly reflected in their position descriptions. Additionally, failure to clearly define the responsibilities of these positions can and is very likely to contribute to conflict in the performance of these jobs as well as confusion among the driving staff_ Both the organizational structure and these job descriptions need to be revised to clarify tasks, responsibilities and lines of authority. Recommendations: • Revise organizational chart to clarify lines of authority. • Revise Job Descriptions for the Transportation Supervisor and Dispatch Supervisor to more correctly describe their respective tasks and responsibilities. Staffing From discussions with staff and observation of the operations and administration of TSI, one is left with the impression of an organization and staff which is managing to keep daily services on the road, but which has no depth of understanding of how to address the operational and organizational issues they face and, perhaps more importantly, have little time to undertake solutions to these issues_ The administrative and operating staff appear to be carrying out their jobs to the best of their abilities and performing adequately, yet it is not clear that they have received the training needed to properly use the software they have available to them or to have a fundamental understanding of their jobs to address issues which are outside of normal parameters, In an organization which must develop business opportunities and pursue grant funding and government contracts, it should be noted that none of the primary staff have experience with the management of private, non-profit corporations, the development of grant or funding applications, or fund development. These skills are needed both in the paid staff and, to some extent, in the skills and experience of the Board. Review of the Job Descriptions of the three primary staff, in addition to identifying the large degree of overlap between the Transportation Supervisor and the Dispatch Supervisor discussed above, also raised questions about whether additional functional areas and tasks need to be added and whether the Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 10 qualification requirements are appropriate for the respective positions. The requirement of an undergraduate degree for the Accounting/Human Resources Administrator seems appropriate given the level of technical expertise expected in this position, however, demonstrated work experience might be allowed as an alternative to the formal degree. We would also question that "basic computer literacy" is sufficient for either of the Supervisor positions. Recommendations: • Identify training opportunities which would enable existing staff to gain needed knowledge to improve performance in their existing positions. • When opportunities arise in seeking new staff or new Directors, seek individuals with experience in the management of private, nonprofit corporations and specialized areas of expertise such as grant writing and fund development. • Review and revise staff job descriptions to add needed functional areas and job tasks with commensurate requirements for experience and education. THE BOTTOM LINE: ORGANIZATION Although Transportation Specialists has a solid reputation as a transportation provider based on past performance, immediate attention to needed to its mission in the transportation arena and its current direction as an organization. There is no long-range plan for the organization's future nor has there been any recognition of the need for a short-range business development plan to respond to the loss of more than half its contract revenues during the 2001/02 year. Present leadership of the organization needs to be expanded through an aggressive recruitment of new Directors, however, this will only be successful in conjunction with a rededicated purpose to this organization. Improved communications to the Board in terms of reporting content and timeliness will serve to more effectively involve the Board in a more immediate and consistent manner in the organization's operations and will give the Directors a better basis for establishing policy and direction. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 11 SECTION 2: FUNDING SOURCE REVIEW Overview The purpose of this element of the TSI management audit is to develop an understanding of the historic and current funding of Transportation Specialists with a particular focus on changes in the patterns of that funding in the last two years. A secondary focus of this examination of funding is the identification of any restrictions or requirements which are associated with these fund sources and their impacts on TSI. Contract Review TSI presently has a total of 6 service contracts of any significant size, as summarized in Table ',Summary of Transportation Specialist Contracts, plus several other minor contracts that produce only incidental revenues. In November 2002, these contracts produced monthly operating revenues totaling_ $62,805 and their estimated annual revenue value for FY2003 is about $771,949. Most of TSI's contracts are "fee for service" and directly correspond to the funding agency, as will be obvious by the similarity of Table 1 to the service summary table which appears in the next section of this report [see Table 3, Summary of TSI Services, page 20]. The exceptions to this "fee for service" are the Jurupa Shuttle and Inter'LINK services, which are funded through a combination of Measure A grant monies from RCTC, Older Americans Act Title I I I funding, donations and, prior to the FY02.03 year, SB 325 Local Transportation Funds received through the Riverside Transit Agency. All of these existing contracts are single -year contracts although some are long- standing contracts that have been repeatedly renewed for successive one-year periods. As shown in Table 1, the rates of compensation vary significantly among these contracts, ranging from a high of $34.50 per vehicle service hour (VSH) for the newest contract with Active Adult Day Health Care Center to $24.50 per VSH for the Friends of Moreno Valley contract and the Inland Regional Center agreement on a per -passenger, per month formula. In the past year, TSI has concluded several service contracts with the Riverside Transit Agency which, combined, produced significant revenues for TSI. During FY01/02, these services operated only through December 31, 2001, and produced revenues totaling $535,813. Interestingly, according to the June 2001 Financials, these RTA projects had costs during that same period of $556,976, resulting in a loss for these RTA projects during that year of <$21,162>. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 12 Table 1 Summary of Transportation Specialist Contracts Contracting Organization Inland Valley Regional Center County of Riverside, Office on Aging Riverside County Transportation Commission Friends of Moreno Valley Active Adult Day Health Care Center Service Description Daily transport of developmentally disabled clients to/from workshops Curb• to-curb transport of targeted seniors who are handicapped, minorities, low income or age 75 and above. Multipurpose Senior Services Program (M SSP), provision of specific trips on request of OoA Measure A gra nt in support of InterLlNK and Jurupa Shuttle services to seniors, disabled and needy. Operation of advance reservation demand - responsive service for seniors and disabled residents of Moreno Valley Contract Term 7/1/02 — 6/30/03 7/1/02 — 6/30/03 7/1/02 — 6/30/03 7/1/02 — 6/30/03 7/1/02 — 6/30/03 ADHC transport to centers 10/22/02 — in San Jacinto and Hemet; 6/30/03 1 vehicle per weekday Annual Value $30,206 $56,655 [maximum value] $140,088 $36,000 [thru 6/30/03] November 2002 Revenue $35,824 .60 $9,527.28 $262.00 Payment Basis $9,750 Monthly per client payment based on distance from residence to workshop $24.50 per VSH or $4.50 per trip on existing TSI services Quarterly payment released upon receipt of prior quarter's report $4,246.50 $3,105 $27.50 per VSH $34.50 per VSH Funding Source Review Over the past 18 months, Transportation Specialists has seen a significant reduction in its contracted levels of service and, correspondingly, in its operating budget and revenues. As noted above, these reductions were due to several contracts with the Riverside Transit Agency which were not renewed with TSI. Table 2, Operating Fund Sources By Year, clearly shows this funding decline, from total operating revenues of $1,741,663 in FYOO/01 when the RTA services were operated for the entire year, to $1,367,741 in FY01 /02 when most of the RTA services were operated only through December 31, 2001, to estimated revenues of under $770,000 in the current year, FY02/03, with only a very small operation for RTA ending in September 2002. As shown in Table 2, TSI's sources of funding can be divided into three categories: Fee For Service Contracts, Grants and Subsidies, and Donations and Local Revenues. Fee For Service Contracts Fee For Service Contracts are those in which T Sl is compensated for providing specific transportation services — for example, provision of daily trips to IRC clients, operation of the MoVan, or transport of an MSSP client for the Office on Aging. The contracts for these services specify a particular trip or service to be provided and the unit of compensation for those services. As can be seen in Table 2, the revenues from this category have been declining in dollar amount and as a percentage of TSI funding over the past two years. Clearly, the eliminated RTA services constitute a serious loss of contract business to TSI, eliminating almost $946,716 in annual revenues during FY01 /02, or 54% of that year's total revenues. At the same time, there has been almost no development of new business to replace this lost business. The sole new contract of any size being the contract with the Active Adult Day Health Care Center, which just became effective in November 2002 and has not yet shown up in TSI's revenue figures. It is expected that this contract will produce revenues of about $36,000 through June 2003. Grants and Subsidies As contrasted to Fee For Service Contracts, grants and subsidies are provided by the sponsoring agencies to underwrite the cost of providing certain services or service to particular client groups without paying the full cost of such services or exercising close control over the manner in which such services are operated. Transportation Specialists has received revenues from three very different grant and subsidy programs: Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, r/rne. Page 14 Table 2 Operating Fund Sources By Year LFY 02/03 Th ru 11/30 Amount Funding Source 'Fee For Service Contracts Inland Regional Center Contract RTA Jurupa Intercity RTA Jur, AH,Z2 Friends of Moreno Walley Charter Se rvices RTA, Anza-Idyli'wiid OoA - MSSP OO A- Escort Service ED Smith Sr C enter 'Grants and Subsidies RCTC Measure A RTA LTF Office on Aging Newslink P ercent $176,718 55.24 % $19,749 $12,679 $3,581 $1,414 6.17% 3.96°% 1.12% 0 .44% 'Do nations & Internal Rev Donations - Passengers interest Donations - Corporate Other Income Total Fiscal Year Funding Projected Annual Funding $214,141 $71,750 $26,476 $98,226 $2,463 $1,916 $184 $2,969 $7,532 $319,898 $767,755 66.94% FY 01/02 Amount Percent 22.43% 8.28% 30. 71% 0,77% 0,60% 0.06% 0.93% 2.35% FY00/01 $423,728 31.47% $271,380 20.15% $250,078 18.57% $41,212 3.06% $12,735 0.95 % $14,355 1.07% $4,962 0 .37% $1,799 0.13 % $1,020,249 $186,000 $84,000 $30,785 $300,785 $8,835 $8,742 $4,779 $3,150 $25,506 $1,346,541 75.77% Amount Percent 13.81% 6.24% 2 .29% 22.'34% $374,259 $434,721 $499,744 $42,926 $5,909 $12,251 $2,295 $1.9,977 21 .49% 24.96% 28.69% 2.46% 0.34% 0.70% 0.13% 1.15% $1,392,082 79 .93% $179,000 $84,000 $36,678 10.28% 4.82% 2.11 % 0.66% 0. 65% 0.35% 0,23%. 1.89% $299,678 17,21% $13,224 $17,749 $4,437 $14,493 $49,903 1,741,663 0.76% 1.02% 0 .25% 0 .83%' 2.87% FY99/00 Not Available FY98/99 Amount Percent $340,227 $275,570 $261,757 $43,378 $2,349 27.07% 21 .92% 20.82©% 3.45% 0 .19% 0.00% 0.00 % 0 .00% $923,281 73 .45% $150,000 $84,000 $44,800 $11,800 $278,800 $9,201 $14,680 $12,180 L $7,046 11.93% 6 .68% 3,56%1 22.18 % 0.73% 1 .17% 0 .97% 0.56% $43,107 3 .43% $1,256,987 Riverside County, Office on Aging; This program has provides TSI with a per -passenger subsidy of $4.80 for each senior passenger transported on TSI's services, up to a total of 6,293 trips under the current agreement. The program is designed to serve specific Target Area Groups, which are defined as individuals age 60 and older who are handicapped, who are minorities of color, have incomes below the poverty level or live alone, and all those who are age 75 and above. For eligible clients, this program provides advance -reservation, curb -to -curb transportation using TSI's InterL1NK, Jurupa Shuttle, and, through October 2002, the South Loop services. RCTC Measure A Specialized Transportation Funding: Measure A funding has long been provided to TSI through the Commission's competitive call for projects to underwrite a portion of the cost of operating the InterLlNK, South Loop and Jurupa Senior Shuttle services. Measure A funding requires a 50% "match" of other funding and specific monthly reporting of operating and financial data on the sponsored services. For FY02/03, these funds have been provided on a contingent basis without a matching requirement, the contingencies being the conduct of this management audit to identify remedies for TSI continuing deficit financial position and a review by staff of service levels to eliminate projected operating deficits. Local Transportation Funds: Eliminated at the end of FY01/02, LTF funds had been received by TSI for about 25 years as partial sponsorship of transportation services which the Riverside Transit Agency was unable to provide due to service area restrictions or the level of personalized service required by the specific passenger. During FY02/03 budget development in Spring 2002, it appears that questions were raised at both ROTC and RTA as to whether this funding was not, in fact, sponsoring services which duplicated RTA public transit services. The finding was made that expansion of RTA services made continued sponsorship of TSI services unnecessary, leading to the elimination of this subsidy. Donations & Internal Revenues This category of revenues, amounting to only 2 to 3% of TSI revenues over the past few years, includes all passenger donations and miscellaneous revenues. The Interest revenue category, which has been the largest of these sources in most years, will be among the lowest during the current year as budget reserves have been consumed in current expenses. Comments on Fund Source Requirements Before leaving the issue of current TSI fund sources, some comment is warranted on two issues raised by requirements associated with this funding, these issues Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 16 being the prohibition of charging fares on programs using Older Americans Act funds and the issue of "match" in Measure A funds. Passenger Donations Versus Fares: In all of the TSI programs, "donations" are suggested rather than requiring the payment of a fare by each passenger. For the InterLINK service and trips on MoVan outside the city limits, the suggested donation is $2 per trip; the Jurupa Senior Shuttle has a suggested donation of $1 per trip; and MoVan local trips have a suggested donation of $0.26. There are two equally -valid reasons for the adoption of a donation system by TSI rather than requiring payment of fares by each passenger. First, the use of donations may be perceived by the primarily senior and disabled clientele as a more "friendly" policy than requiring payment of a set fare by each boarding passenger. Second, the claiming of the Office on Aging senior subsidy for each senior passenger on each of the TSI services carries with it an Older Americans Act prohibition against denying service to seniors if they are unable to pay for those services. On the flip side, donations usually result in lower per passenger revenues, as evidenced by the per passenger donation rates seen in Table 6 [see pp. 30-31] of $0.78 for the lnterLiNK service and $0.41 for the Jurupa Shuttle, compared to suggested donations of $2.00 and $1.00, respectively. Presently, the Office on Aging subsidizes up to 6,293 trips on TSi services at a subsidy of $4.50 per trip -- which is clearly higher than any passenger fare that could be reasonably collected. According to the November 2002 financials, 87% of the available funding from this source has already been recognized in the first 5 months of the budget year, suggesting that this fund source will be exhausted before the end of December. In light of the limited funding from this source, consideration might be given to targeted the Office on Aging senior subsidy only on the Jurupa Shuttle and instituting a required passenger fare on the Inter -LINK service, so as to achieve an overall increase in passenger revenues. While the Jurupa Shuttle does not presently transport sufficient passenger to exhaust the Office on Aging subsidy funds, ridership on this service could be developed with increased marketing and use of the community fixed -route nature of this service. Recommendations: • Consider limiting use of OoA senior subsidy to Jurupa Senior Shuttle and instituting_passenger fares on the Inter -LINK services to increase -passenger revenues_ • Increase marketing of Jurupa Senior Shuttle and emphasis of community fixed route features of this program to increase efficiency and ridership. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 17 Measure A "Match" Requirement. The Measure A Specialized Transit Program has an administrative requirement that each applicant for grant funds demonstrate an equal amount of funding from other sources. This is referred to as a "50% match" requirement. in past applications for Measure A funding, TS'I has met the 50% match requirement through use of LTF funding from RTA , the Office on Aging senior subsidy, charter contract revenues, and passenger and corporate donations. In some cases, these estimated revenues were higher than the levels that were actually achieved. With elimination of LTF funding from the TSI budget, this organization was left without revenue sources other than fee for service contracts with which to achieve the 50% match on Measure A. In the current year, for example, it can be projected that TSI will realize about $48,000 in potential matching revenue from the Office on Aging subsidy and from "Donations" and internal revenue sources. To this might be added the charter services revenues, as has been done in prior years, but this begs clarification of exactly what "match" is supposed to represent. if match is supposed to represent unreserved revenues which will be used to fund the same services as Measure A, then charter revenues are not match since one would expect that they represent reimbursement of costs incurred in providing a specific transportation service for another entity — i.e. a fee for service. This situation presents a clear dilemma in TSI's future funding picture. THE BOTTOM LINE: FUNDING With the exception of Measure A grant support from ROTC, Transportation Specialists exists presently on "fee for service" contracts, in which compensation is directly related to the provision of specific services. Over the past 18 months, several major service contracts were not renewed with TSI as a result of competitive public bidding, which reduced total annual revenues by 54% from their high-water mark in FY00/01. Further, this same period saw termination of Local Transportation funding from the Riverside Transit Agency, eliminating a general subsidy for the transportation provided by TSI in the South County and Jurupa Valley. During the past 12 months, there have been only small contracts added by TSI, with little impact on this revenue gap. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 18 SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF SERVICES AND PROGRAMS Overview Transportation Specialists, as the name indicates, exists entirely to provide transportation services "to those in need," to quote its Articles of Incorporation. This section reviews the transportation services operated by TSI, analyzes TSI's operating data, and then examines how these services are provided within the T'S1 organization. Review of Transportation Services Primary Services At the end of 2002, TSI operates 5 transportation services on a regular basis and provides several incidental services on an occasional, as -requested basis. The primary services are summarized in Table 3, Summary of TSI Services and are, briefly, as follows: Inland Counties Regional Center (IRC): Utilizing 8 vehicles each weekday, this program transports developmentally disabled individuals to and from their homes or residences and sheltered workshop programs. These trips are handled as subscription trips and caregivers are supposed to call and cancel the day's trip when the client is sick or not being transported for some reason. This program has quite strict requirements for on -time pick- ups and drop-offs [95% within +1- 20 minutes of the designated time], average ride time [may not exceed 75 minutes], maximum ride time [90 minutes] and custodianship of the clients. Payment is based on the distance from their home to the program site and paid as a monthly rate for a round trip each weekday. InterLINK: Operated using 3 vehicles each weekday, the InterL1NK service provides inter -city transportation throughout the southwestern area of Riverside County to seniors age 60 and above and individuals who have permanent disabilities. Trips may be made for any purpose, however, staff attempts to give priority for medical trips. Individuals must pre -register prior to using the service with the TSI office. Once registered, passengers must reserve a ride at least 24 hours ahead of the travel day and may call up to 2 weeks ahead. The day prior to a requested trip, the TSI scheduler will call the passenger to confirm the trip time. In practice, individuals are told to call at least 2 days ahead to improve their chances of getting their desired trip and there is often limited chance of getting a trip between the Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, inc. Page 19 Table 3 Summary of TSI Services Service Funding Sources' , Des Option of 4erVIce Clientele Peak Vehicles VSH per Month * VSM per Month * Inland Regional Center Inland Regional Center Daily transport of developmentally disabled clients to/from workshops Development ally Disabled Clients 8 1003 17979 InterLJNK RCTC Measure A OoA Title III Donations Interest Charter/Contract Advance reservation inter -area service throughout southwestern Riverside County Seniors [60+ ] Disabled 3 395 10846 Jurupa Senior Shuttle Same as lnterLlNK Advance reservation hourly shuttle service to grocery stores and nutrition sites within the Jurupa Valley, Seniors [60+] Disabled 1 108 1535 Mo Van Friends of Moreno Valley — Advance reservation, curb• to-curb transportation to medical appointments, sho pping and personal errands within the City of Moreno Valley and within a 35 mile radius. Seniors [60+] Disabled 1 149 2586 Active Adult Day Health Care Center Active Adult Day Health Care Center Transportation of ADHC clients to/from homes and centers in San Jacinto and Hemet. Vehicle alternates days between 2 centers. ADHC clients 1 90 na *Vehicle Service Hours and Miles are based on average July -September 2002 statistics with the exception of Inland Regional Center, where these data are based on July 2001•June 2002. hours of 6:30 to 9:00 am and 2:00 to 5:30 pm, as these periods are generally booked in advance by regular passengers. Jurupa Valley Senior Shuttle: Using a single vehicle in service each weekday from 9:00 am to about 2:30 pm, the Jurupa Shuttle is available to seniors 60 years of age and above and area residents with permanent disabilities who are unable to utilize alternative transportation. Trips are provided on this service to grocery stores and area nutrition sites. As with the InterLINK service, individuals wishing to ride on the Jurupa Shuttle must phone in a trip request a day ahead and up to 2 weeks prior. Again, to improve one's chances of getting a trip, staff recommend calling at least 2 days ahead. As suggested by the name "shuttle," this service operates on an hourly basis like a community fixed route, yet, in practice, has limited capacity and functions like an advance reservation service following a loosely -defined route. Friends of Moreno Valley Senior Center, "Mo-Van": Mo-Van is a single - vehicle, advance -reservation service operating anywhere within the City of Moreno Valley and within a 35 -mile radius. Trips are provided to individuals who are disabled or age 60 and above for medical appointments, shopping, and personal errands. TSI operates the Mo-Van under contract to the Friends of Moreno Valley Senior Center and bills the Friends on a per -vehicle service hour basis. TSI is responsible for supervision of the service, scheduling and dispatching trip requests, providing a trained and qualified driver and arranging for vehicle maintenance. The Friends set the policies for this program, arrange for its funding and provide the Mo-Van vehicle. Active Adult Day Health Care Center: The newest service to be operated by TSI, the contract for this program was signed in November 2002 and service initiated in late October. This program transports clients on Tuesdays and Thursdays from the Palm Desert area to the Active Adult facility in San Jacinto and, on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, from Moreno Valley to the Active Adult facility. Each of these services is a reservation -type transportation program, offering service on advance reservations of from one -day to long-term subscriptions for the Inland Regional Center clients. Each of these services requires the attention of the TSI scheduling staff to process trip requests into vehicle manifests for each day's service and the transmission of these prepared manifests to the assigned drivers on the day prior to each service day. Following the service day, staff time is required to reconcile the drivers manifests with the computer scheduling record and to enter data on the actual services provided. This data processing can be quite time-consuming due to the Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 21 variability of service conditions and contract requirements to collect and prepare operational reporting on the level and quality of services provided. Incidental Services In addition to the primary services discussed above, incidental services are provided to the following organizations and agencies: Riverside County Housing Agency: Radnet Management:: Group outings about once/wk. Billed at $30.00/VSH. Maximum annual contract value = $2,000. Sponsorship of client trips to an associated medical imaging center. TSI received a donation of $4.50 per one-way trip. This contract saw very little service and expired on 12/31/02. Co. of Riverside, Agency on Aging: Multipurpose Senior Services Program [MSSP], provides specific trips on request from Office on Aging_ Billed to 0oA at rate of $24.50/VSH. Maximum annual value $40,000. These incidental services do not provide services every day and cannot be relied upon from a service planning perspective to require a predictable level of equipment or staffing and do not result in a predictable level of monthly revenue. They should be viewed as additional sources of revenue when the staffing and equipment are available to meet their requests. Operational Data Operating Data For each of the primary services operated by TSI, operating data is collected on a daily basis, tabulated monthly and recorded in TSI databases. For each service, this data generally includes: one-way passenger trips by passenger type, vehicle service hours, vehicle service miles and passenger donations. This operating data for TSI's primary four services — InterLlNK/South Loop Service, Jurupa Shuttle, Friends of Moreno Valley and the Inland Regional Center -- are shown in Appendix A, Operating Data, to this report for the period July 1998 through September 2002. This operating data is reported by Transportation Specialists to its principal funding agencies, the Riverside County Transportation Commission and, through Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc, Page 22 June 2002, the Riverside Transit Agency. Reporting to ROTC is done on a quarterly basis and to RTA was done monthly. Collection of this operating data highlighted several significant problems with data management at TSi and raised questions concerning data and reporting accuracy, which will be addressed below. Simply from the standpoint of data management and retention, we encountered significant problems in assembling a complete set of TSl reports for the previous four years, There is no single set of hard copy reports and computer copies of these reports are mislabeled, disorganized and incomplete. Additionally, operating data is not prepared on a timely basis coincident with the close of each month, as is evidenced by the absence of operating data for October, November or December 2002. This data must be assembled on a timely basis both to support management and to permit correction of errors before significant time has passed. Lastly, in searching for missing documentation, donation records from 2 years ago, which should be properly archived, were found taking up needed working space. Recommendations: • Ensure preparation of monthly operating data on a timely basis_ following the close of each month; • Organize and maintain computer records for easy access; • Maintain paper report copies in binders or files by year; • Archive operating data and records for completed fiscal years away from active work areas. Accuracy of Reported Data To assess the accuracy of operational data being reported by TSI, four routes and months were selected at random for the period July 2002 through September 2002. The selected routes and months were: Route 35, South Loop Route 46, InterUnk Jurupa Shuttle Route 41, lnterLink July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 September 2002 For each selected route and month, the driver manifests were obtained and reviewed to independently calculate the following operational data: Vehicle Service Hours Total Miles Operated Deadhead Miles Total Passengers, No -Shows and Cancellations Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 23 Table 4, Results of Data Review, shows the results of this audit. While the recomputed statistics differ somewhat from those calculated by TSI by minor amounts in most of the data categories, the differences are not significant and there is no particular pattern to the differences identified. These differences are not surprising and may, in fact, by debatable given the fact that the original entries are often difficult to read and some have been corrected so as to be almost illegible. These problems could be reduced by redesigning the driver manifest sheets to provide additional room for data entry, however, this may not be practical since these forms are generated by the Scooter scheduling software. Other solutions include emphasizing the importance to driving staff of their manifests and recording calculations on the manifests when performing the data entry. Recommendations: • Redesign driver manifests to provide additional space for data entry and for recording events which take the vehicle out of service, place the vehicle into another route or switch vehicles in the middle of service run. • Train drivers on importance of accurate data recording to reduce the incidence of illegible entries and incomplete record keeping. • Record computations on manifests and forms during reconciliation and data entry to facilitate double-checking computations_ and easy audit of data process. Comparison of Internal Records to Submitted Reports As a next step in the audit process, TSI's internal records were compared to the data reported to ROTC under the Measure A program and to RTA related to the receipt of LTF funds. Review of the RCTC Measure A reports identified a significant problem in that, at least for the most recent reporting period, the submitted Measure A Transit Operators Quarterly Report does not follow the specified definitions for Vehicle Service Hour and Vehicle Service Mile. As seen the Jurupa statistics in Table 4 for miles, TSI is reporting total miles to RCTC as "Vehicle Service Miles." Further, TSI is reporting driver pay hours as "Vehicle Service Hours," in that the computation does not include only the time from vehicle arrival at the first passenger pick-up and end at the location of the last passenger drop-off, excluding meal breaks, service breaks and mechanical breakdowns. These definitions were adopted by RCTC in 1999 and all Measure A recipients were trained on proper reporting pursuant to these definitions. If Vehicle Service Miles and Hours were calculated and reported correctly, this would significantly reduce TSI's reported service levels by approximately 15%. Ironically, this correction in data reporting would increase TSI's productivity in Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 24 Table 4 TSI Management Audit Results of Data Review South Loo , July 2002 TS' Rep ort Audit TSI Rep ort A udit 394 399 84 86 Total Passengers84 99 204.5 205 .3 Tota l Vehicle Hours 2896 2968 5790 5760 Total Miles 591 606 633 640 Deadhead Miles 591 5150 Vehicle Service Miles 2305 2290 InterLINK Route 41, Sep 2002 Jurupa Shuttle, Sep 2002 Rep orted to TSI Repo rt Audit TS! Rep ort Audit RCTC 83 84 333 328 333 Total Passengers 83 10'1 .2 108.7 Total Vehicle Hours 71.4 74'.2 To tal Miles 02 255 1907 1996 1502 15 502 Deadhead M iles 407 455 1247 1253 1502 Vehicie Servic e Miles 1500 1541 1nt erLINK R oute 46, Aug 2002 terms of passengers per Vehicle Service Hour since the number of passengers transported would be divided by a smaller number of hours. Recommendations: • Utilize rp er definitions of Vehicle Service Hours and Miles; • Verify and recompute, if needed, Vehicle Service Hours and Miles at least back to July 2002 using the correct data definitions for Vehicle Service Hours and Miles. Comparison of the statistics reported to RCTC and RTA for the same services in a random selection of 6 months during FY0C101 and FY01102 identified another problem in that the statistics contained in these reports did not agree in many periods, sometimes by major differences. As shown in Table 5, comparison of Data Reported to RCTC and RTA, the statistics reported to the two agencies in some periods were identical while, in others, the differences were significant. Review of the operating records with TSI staff suggests that much of the discrepancy in operating data may arise from submission of monthly totals generated by the computer scheduling software without reviewing this data first for completeness or errors. Review of TSl donation records, however, shed no light on the reasons for these differences and, in fact, failed to support either of the reported donation figures in five months examined. Further investigation should be conducted into cash deposit records to verify cash donation figures. To prevent occurrence of problems of this type, it is important that a program establish a single set of data files and that these be relied upon as the source for all reports submitted by that agency. Recommendations: • Establish a single set of operating data records for use whenever reporting is required. • Ensure that amended reports are submitted to all monitoring agencies when corrections are made to data. • Conduct further investigation into cash deposit records to determine actual donation amounts for audited months. Donation Handling Procedures in the course of reviewing the donation records to determine the reasons for the discrepancy discussed above, TSi staff were interviewed regarding the procedures used to accept donations, the handling of donations once received, and the processing and recording of donation revenues. Each driver on the Jurupa and lnterL'I'NK services receives a supply of preprinted donation envelopes. An envelope is handed to each passenger when they board the bus and the driver collects these envelopes when the passenger deboards. During or at the end of their shift, drivers open the donation envelopes and Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 26 Table 5 TSI Management A udit Comparison of RCTC Measure A and RTA LTF Reports Jan -02 Aug -01 tun -02 May -02 ROTC RTA Ir+terLlfdK Ser vices RCTC RTA ROT C RTA RCTC RTA 1301 1301 764 599 651 916 1188 Toted Passengers. 561 736 745 741 900 618 618 Total Vehicle Hours 494 851 17948 21480 13509 13507 618 11938 19286 17704 13884 567 1659 564 655 Vehicle Service Miles 990 557 Fares/Do nations 411 991 Sep -00 Sample 6 Month Totals Feb-01 RCTC RTA RCTC RTA RCTC RTA Difference °r6 Difference 0.93 1302 1259 1660 1644 6339 6807 (468) 0.88 Total Pa ssengers 556 556 799 799 3944 4469 (525) Taal Vehicle Hours(7,058) 0.94 102102 109160 Vehicle Service Miles 16777 16777 24228 24226 4318 (1,119) 0 .79 Fares/Donations 1059 848 727 Jan -02 Aug -01 Jun -02 May -02 RCTC RTA Jurupa Shuttle RCTC RTA RCTC RTA RC TC RTA 288 259 343 351 351 Total Vehicle Hours 89 286 284 309 67 106 1061 Total Passengers 84 109 121 107 1077 1077 2 1326 135 1174 1288 1212 1142 231 326 Vehicle Service M iles 75 95 75 123 123 Fares/Donations 118 Feb -01 Sep -00 Sample 6 Mo nth Totals RCTC RTA RCTC RTA Difference % Difference RCTC RTA 1871 1872 (1) 1.00 332 332 305 303 33 1,06 To tal Passengers 81 85 85 577 544 Total Vehicle Hours 81 1350 1795 1795 7934 7978 (44) 0 .99 1350 84 1.99 Vehicle Ser vice M iles 235 235 1070 986 Fares/Donations 268 268 consolidate the donations into a single envelope, on which they record the route, driver name and date. The consolidated donations and completed manifests for each InterLUNK route are returned to the TSI offices by the part-time clerk/driver, where the donations envelopes are placed in a locked cabinet. The Jurupa driver turns in his/her completed manifest and donations daily when they return to the office at the end of their shift. About once a week, the consolidated donation envelopes are removed from the locked cabinet and counted by two members of the TSI staff. The count is recorded and provided to the Accounting/Human Resources Administrator, who enters this data into the accounting records. Immediate changes are needed to this donation process to eliminate the opportunity for mishandling of funds and to protect the confidentiality of passengers' donations. Donation envelopes should be sealed by the passenger before being returned to the driver and should be turned in by each driver in their individual sealed condition, instead of being opened and consolidated by the drivers. By opening the envelopes, drivers expose themselves to possible suspicion should there be any claim of missing donations. Additionally, with the low ridership numbers in some of these services, it would be logical that drivers would have a good knowledge of which passenger turned in which envelope, allowing the drivers to know the amounts donated by their passengers, thus compromising the confidentiality of this donation process. It is also understood that, upon occasion, drivers have had to use donation cash to purchase oil for vehicles when this was needed between maintenance servicing. This practice should also be ceased immediately as it could lead to loss of control over donation revenues and gives a wrong impression of the TSI organization and its administrative procedures if this were to be observed and reported by others. Recommendation: Ensure that donation envelopes are sealed when collected by the drivers and remain sealed until counted under 2 -person control in the TSI offices. Review of Service Performance While the operating performance ofTSI's transportation services could be measured on a variety of measures, four specific measures are most important for the purposes of this management audit: Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Service Hour: Generally referred to as "service productivity," this is a measure of scheduling efficiency and is affected by the volume of trip demand, the size of the service area and various service policies. Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Service Mile: This is also a measure of system efficiency and provides an indication of demand density and travel Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc_ Page 28 distances. Vehicle Service Miles per Vehicle Service Hour: This measure shows average vehicle speed for each service, which indicates the frequency of passenger stops and average trip distances. This measure, obviously, is affected by the traffic congestion within the service area as well as the use of freeways. Donations Per Passenger: This measure simply indicates the average donation "yield" on each service, which can be useful in deciding between the institution of fares versus donations and in developing programs to increase passenger donations. These four measures have been computed for each of the four principal TSI services, and the results appear in Table 6, Performance Measures. To focus particularly on the most important measure, Passengers Per Vehicle Service Hour [`"Productivity"], this measure has been graphed in Figure 2, TSI Historical Productivity. The results for each service and for the overall TSI system are discussed below. South Loop/InterLINK Service These statistics actually reflect the combined operations of two specific services: the InterLINK service described earlier in this report and the South Loop service which ceased operation on November 1, 2002, and provided fixed -route deviation service from the South County area to remote destinations in Riverside and as far as the VA and Loma Linda medical facilities. At an average productivity of 1.32 passengers per vehicle hour in 01/02 and 1.50 for the first three months of this year, this service is highly personalized, serves a large service area and carries few riders on fairly long trips. Over the past two years, this service has actually shown as marked decrease in productivity of just over 40%, from 2.2 passengers per hour in the 00/01 year. This decrease can be seen in Figure 2, particularly in the second half of the FY01/02 year. Although this project was not able to delve into the detail of each service's ridership, this decline coincides with changes in the scheduling staff at TSI and also suggests that there are few new passengers being served by the InterLINK service and limited opportunities for achieving shared -rides. Among the other measures, the speed measure — Vehicle Service Miles per Hour — is interesting in that this service averaged over 27 miles per hour in the July — September 2002 period. This suggests both few passenger stops associated with low ridership and possibly that this service is operating on freeways for long- distance trips. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, inc. Page 29 Table 6 Transportation Specialists, inc_ Performance Measures South Loopllutert,IHK Service Jurup. Shuttle PaisAiSH PassNSM VSMfV`H DCmvPass Piss/VS..H Pas( VSM VSMVVSH DormPass 02/03 Sept 1.55 0.06 27.3 $0.82 3.06 0.22 13.8 $0.41 Aug 1.50 0.05 28.0 $0.88 2.95 0.20 14.4 $0.41 July 1.45 0.05 27.1 $0.65 2.90 0.20 14.4 $0.41 rota1 62/03 1.50 0:05 27.5 50.78 297 021 142 30.41 01/02 June 1.14 0.05 24.2 30,73 3.21 024 13.2 $0.41 May 0.81 0.03 24.1 51.65 2.83 0.25 11.1 40.31 Apr 0.80 0.03 24.9 51.37 267 0.26 10.2 30.35 Mar 0.63 0.03 18.9 50.59 2.70 0.22 12.3 50.26 Feb 0.97 0.05 19.5 $0.68 1.97 0.17 11.8 $0.46 Jan 1.24 0.05 24.2 $0.62 2.69 0.27 10.1 $0.43 Dec 1.97 0.08 26.2 $1.37 3,46 0.24 14.3 50.43 Nov 2.16 0.08 26.4 50.59 3.82 0.30 128 $0.63 Oct 1.79 0.07 25.0 50.57 4.19 0.29 14,4 $0.63 Sept 1.43 0.10 14.5 $0.74 297 0.21 13.9 $0.70 Aug 2.11 0.10 21.9 30.43 3.31 0.26 12.5 50.66 July 1.69 0.08 22.3 50.58 3.33 0.29 11.5 $0.73 rota101/02 1.32 0.06 22.2 50.77 3.05 0.25 122 50.51 00/01 June 2.62 0.09 29.3 $0.58 3.24 0.26 12.4 $0.58 May 2.02 0.08 262 $0.41 3.45 0.27 12.8 50.66 Apr 1.61 0.06 27.4 50.64 3.71 0.22 17.1 $0.75 Mar 2.29 0.07 32.6 30.72 3.68 0.20 18.5 $0.75 Feb 2.34 0.08 30.2 50.81 4.10 0.25 16.7 $0.81 Jan 1.75 0.05 33.4 $0.69 3.79 0.23 16.7 50.58 Dec 2.26 0.07 329 50.85 3.00 0.18 16.3 30.62 Nov 2.82 0.06 49.3 $0.61 3.11 0.23 13.3 50.83 Oct 2.34 0.06 41.7 50.51 3.21 0.20 16.1 $0.73 Sept 2.08 0.07 30.3 50.44 3.59 0.17 21.1 $0.77 Aug 2.85 0.08 36.2 50.39 3.24 0.17 18.8 $0.81 July _ 1.78 0.07 27.4 30.60 2.66 0.18 14.4 50.70 rotal 00/01 2 0.07 328 50.59 3.40 0.21 16.1 $0.71 99/00 June 2.28 0.09 24.7 50.45 May 1.59 0.07 22.8 50.61 Apr 1.93 0.08 242 5021 Mar 255 0.14 18.1 50.52 Feb 218 0.08 28.2 50.66 Jan 1.98 0,07 26.7 $0.83 Dec 2.28 0.11 20.6 $0.61 Nov 2.11 0.09 22.6 50.74 Oct 2.09 0.07 29.0 50.75 Sept 2.02 0.08 24.8 31.12 Aug 2.20 0.09 24.8 50.72 July 2.08 _ 0.09 22.8 50.65 rotaf 99/00 2.11 0.09 24.0 50.65 98199 .June 1,90 0,08 25.2 50.71 May 2.31 0.10 24.0 $0.97 Apr 2.36 0.10 24.8 30.88 Mar 2.60 0,10 26.5 50.91 Feb 2.20 0.09 23.6 50.46 Jan 2.32 0.09 25.7 50.86 Dec 2.03 0.08 25.6 50.70 Nov 2.27 0.08 28.5 $0.52 Oct 1.99 0.07 28.2 50.55 Sept 1.96 0.06 31.7 50.29 Aug 155 0.05 31.6 $0.91 July 1.57 0.05 30.5 50.78 fatal 98199 2.06 0.07 27.9 $0.666 Page 30 Table 6 - Continued Transportation Specialists, Inc. Performance Measures Friend* of Moreno Valley Inland Valley Regional Center Pasa+VSH PastNSAU VSWJSH CnnPass Pa3'.SNSH PassIVS41 VSMNZH 02/03 Sept 237 0.11 21.1 50.30 3.58 0.17 20.5 Aug 220 0.13 16.9 50.35 3.44 0.17 20.7 July 1.74 0,12 14.9 70.55 3.32 0.16 20.2 Total 02/03 2.09 0.12 17.4 50.39 3.44 0.17 20.5 01/02 June 2.14 0.11 19.3 40.88 6.47 0.33 19.6 May 2.36 0.12 20.4 50.66 4.23 0.34 12.3 Apr 1.74 0.10 17.6 30.78 4.45 0.34 13.2 Mar 1.82 0.16 11.2 40.80 4.70 0.34 13.7 Feb 1.92 0.13 15.0 50.62 5.88 0.30 19.6 Jan 1.88 0.10 18.6 40.68 5.56 0.28 19.9 Dec 1.75 0.14 12.1 40.96 5.70 0.23 25.1 Nov 2.16 0.11 19.4 70.63 5.05 0.25 19.3 Oct 2.39 0.16 14.9 50.67 4.29 0.22 19.4 Sept 1.98 0.23 8.7 40.83 5.86 0.25 23.7 Aug 2 ?7 0.25 8.9 50.64 5.27 0.30 17.9 July 2.29 0.16 14.2 50.67 5.06 0.26 19.1 Total01102 2.04 0.14 14.8 50.73 5.11 0.29 17.9 00101 June 2,31 0.13 18.3 50.53 4.78 0.25 19.0 May 212 0.15 14.4 50.81 4.76 0.31 15.3 Apr 2.15 0.15 14.6 50.84 5.11 0,27 19.0 Mar 2.30 0.14 16.9 50.69 5.24 0.24 21.5 Feb 1.95 0.11 17.4 30.83 4.74 0.26 18.6 Jan 2.14 0.09 24.5 513,84 4.75 0,25 18.7 Dec 211 0.10 20.6 40.73 4.45 0.25 17.5 Nov 2.38 0,11 21.5 40.25 4.99 0.20 24.8 Oct 2.59 0.12 21.3 50.48 5.37 0.27 19,7 Sept 2.66 0.12 21.6 30.77 5.41 0,26 20.4 Aug 2.44 0.15 16.7 40.58 6.36 0.33 19.4 July 213 0.12 18.0 50.77 5.34 0.26 20.7 Total 00/01 2.27 0.12 18.8 50.67 5.49 0.26 21.0 99/00 June 217 0.15 14.9 $0.66 5.18 0.24 21.8 May 2.17 0.12 17.6 70.65 4.84 0.27 17.7 Apr 2.48 0.16 15.9 50.80 5.66 0.26 21.5 Mar 2.95 0.20 15.0 50.46 6.37 0.32 19.7 Feb 2.61 0.10 25.1 40.51 6.25 0.33 19.1 Jan 1.88 0.10 16.3 50.90 5,77 0.29 20.2 Dec 1.77 0.09 19.4 70.82 6.37 0.33 19.6 Nov 2.10 0.11 18.8 50.84 6.17 0.32 19.1 Oct 216 0.11 19.8 80.72 6.96 0.34 20,5 Sept 2.14 0.11 18.7 40.60 6.68 0.34 19.7 Aug 2.73 0.13 212 50.45 5.49 0.32 16.9 July 2.16 0.11 19.8 50.66 5.91 0.34 17.5 Total 99/00 228 0.12 18.7 40.65 5.94 0.31 19.3 98199 June 2.84 0.12 23.0 50.58 6.18 0.30 20.3 May 2.87 0.12 24.8 $0.42 5.66 0..28 19.9 Apr 1.94 0.09 22.1 50.69 5.73 0.31 18.5 Mar 2.25 0.11 20.6 30.45 6.47 0.33 19.4 Feb 1.87 0.10 19.7 40.55 7.28 0.36 20.4 Jan 1.84 0.09 20.9 50.46 7.31 0.35 20.6 Dec 1.88 0.10 19.0 40.36 Nov 2.01 0.10 20.4 70.45 Oct 2.04 0.10 19.5 50.45 Sept 1.86 0.13 13.9 40.35 Aug 2.72 0.13 21.0 40.33 July 2.74 0.13 21.9 50.37 total 98/99 2.22 0.11 20.3 40,45 6.38 0.86 7 4 Page 31 Figure 2 TS! Historical Prod uctivity PassengersNSH 8 7- 6 4 3 1- I-, ..1 ....1 11 I 1 1. 1. 1 1 v 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 I I r Y 1 I 1 ... 1' _ N .. 7_, _.1_:..1_.._.1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 11_I_'I_ L -1 _II _I_LIJ 'I 1! 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -IW h t -! -1 1 r t-1 r fi-1 -1-I- l- 1 -I I. 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { I 1 I I I 1 I I I b 1 { b 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .I 11 I 1 X 1 I i I I 1 1 I p 1 I 1 b I I 1 1 I I 111111 I I 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1- 1 1 I 1 I 1 I .1'Y 1 1 I I 4' I I I 1 1 I I 1 Y I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 g 1 1 1 i 1 1 Y I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Y 1 1 I 1 M 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1. I 1 1 i I 1 Y I 1 1 1 1 1 1 + -1 -N- I- 1- .I' -1 - I- a- 4 -1 -1- I• - 4- -1 -1-'h ✓" -+ -1. -. 1. 1-- 4 -I .-.1- 1- 4- -1 -1 - I- 1- 4 -1 -1-- 1- 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y i 1 1 1 1: 1 Y 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 1 I I ' 1 ! 1 I 1 I 1 ..1. 1 1 1 1 1. Y I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I. 1 .1 I.' I I L I 1 I 11 Y 1 V I I 1 I Y I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 4: 1 I •i 1 1. 1 1 11 1. I Y I If 1 I I 1 I I 1{ 1 1111111111111 J I I Y l I I 1 Y• 1 I I —I —r r1-I-1-rI —-1-r i-1-1-r7—I-1—r `I-1`IrI I— 1 I l { I I. I- I -1 f, i k I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 2 $ ' J F L _. I I- L L -I L JI, L .1 - ... -..i -1 1 L 1 _Iw 1 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 1 I l l I I V i 1 1 I I I I I M 1' I 1 1 I• 1 Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'I I. I- Y i t E. 1 I 1 ,:I I 11 1 I IY 1 1 1 1 1 -Y 1- .I ! I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I l 1 I I l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I I t .4 1 1 1 1 Y I-1 l I 1 T1-I-I-i1--'I-r T7,-1-r r-i"1`1`r 7-1-k-r:r:.`l-1 t"r-1"1-1—f T7--r"r-1-I-'l- r1-1-i-r 77-17rT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 'l 1 1• 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 _1 l l 1 'Y I 'P I 1 1 I Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Y 1 I- I I 1 1 1 1 1 1I 1 I I 11 I l Y 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Y 1 111.1 t '1' ! 1 1 1 I 1 Y 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ^>u I I Y 4 1 Y Y I ` 1 1 E- l" I III I 1 1 1 I 1 I I ^,CFO (yy 1 I� 1 [. 1 1 ! [f 11 1 1 1 1 1 I pp 1 1 f 1 } I,,�7 P [ P 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 7 1 1 1 1 1 [Ji O Q7 cU �' C CS /-� N 8.1:11 0 0 - C N 8 M onths 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I I M I I 1 1 1 1 1 1111 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 111-111111- -1 - I- I- f - I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 l 1 1 I I P Y 1 1. 1 I I I l Y 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 4 -4 —1— 1- J. - • I 1 1 i 4 Y 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I u 1 II 1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 1 1 III I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 I 1I I I I I 1 Y N Y I 1 1 I I 1. 1 1 I I 1 1 rt/Li I (� O u 4- 1 1 1 1 Y I I -I—I— r --q t < Y I CO 1 IW 0 < CI --*-- JLl I L J f unapa sir" EMV Jurupa Shuttle After hitting a peak productivity of almost 4.2 passengers per hour in October 2001, this service saw a serious decline in productivity until February 2002 and has been slowly recovering since then. At an average productivity of around 3 passengers per hour, this service performs better than either the InterLINK or Friends services, but achieves a lower productivity than should be expected from a targeted shuttle service with a limited service area. Development of group -trip policies and emphasis of shared -ride scheduling should be able to push productivities into the range of 5 passengers per hour. The Miles per Passenger measure for the Jurupa Shuttle reflects the smaller service area, shorter average trip lengths and higher productivity of this service. Interestingly, the average passenger donation seen in this service has declined significantly from $0.71 in FYOO/01 to $0.41 in the first three months of FY02/03 — a decline of 42%. Friends of Moreno Valley This service shows fairly consistent ridership over the period examined, ranging from almost 2.3 passengers per hour to just over 2.0 passengers per hour for the past 15 months. Similarly, the Miles per Passenger and service speed measures have been pretty consistent for this service. This service, like the Jurupa shuttle, has seen a decline in its average donation yield, from an average of $0.73 during FY01/02 to only $0.39 for the first three months of FY02/03. Inland Regional Center TSI`s major service, IRC accounts for fully 80% of TSI's total passenger trips and almost 69% of the total vehicle service hours operated. This service, though, like the InterLINK and, to a lesser extent, the Jurupa Shuttle, has seen declining productivities from historic levels, most recently achieving an average productivity of 3.44 passengers per hour for July - September 2002 as compared to 5.11 in FY01 /02 and 5.49 in FYOO/01. If one considers the monthly productivities graphed in Figure 2, however, one is struck by the variability of these numbers month to month. The operating statistics shown in Appendix A, if anything, are even more confusing, with huge increases in vehicle service hours operated in March, April and May 2002 without a comparable increase in miles operated, and increases of 70% in hours and alrnost 75% in miles operated from June 2002 to July 2002, at the same time as passenger trips declined 13%. While staff indicates that there have been some significant service increases in the IRC services in South County with initiation of runs 301/302 and 401/402 in Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 33 January 2002, these statistics remain highly questionable. Overall TSI Performance Taken together, these performance statistics portray a set of transportation services which are declining in the total passenger trips being provided and are expending more resources — vehicle service hours and miles — to transport a smaller number of passengers. The productivity levels which are being achieved and their decline as compared to prior years suggests decreased demand for trips and possibly the adoption of scheduling practices which do not encourage or permit adequate levels of shared -riding. It is also possible, though not able to be verified under this project, that these services have become increasingly dedicated to the provision of subscription trips to a relatively small group of regular riders, which locks the services into repetitive, low productivity runs and steadily eliminates the opportunity for new riders and the creation of shared -rides. improvements to scheduling practices through updated software and training of staff, increased marketing of TSI's transportation services, periodic revision and renegotiation of subscription trips and consideration of service policies which ensure adequate opportunities for new passengers and shorter, higher frequency trips might all be considered for improvement of TSI's current operations. Such improvements might have a marginal impact on TSI's overall financial situation, but could prevent the loss of additional services and contracts, which would worsen the present situation. Recommendations: • Ensure that proper data definitions are adhered to for all transportation services operated by TSI; • Develop and implement a program of operational improvements to shore up current transportation services. THE BOTTOM LINE: SERVICES & PROGRAMS Transportation Specialists operations have declined in passengers and operating performance over the past 18 months. Actions are needed to improve scheduling and dispatch techniques, to increase demand for services and to increase the opportunities for delivery of increased trips with the same resources. These actions can result in improved performance of existing services and protection of these contracts, preventing further loss of service contracts and revenues. Management Audit of Transportation Special sts, Page 34 SECTION 4: AUDIT ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Overview The previous three sections of this audit report have addressed the TSI organization, its contracts and funding, and the transportation services it provides. This section draws together information from these three areas to highlight the basic problems facing this organization and to begin to identify avenues and directions for addressing and resolving these issue. Revenues Versus Expenses The current basic issue for Transportation Specialists is that current expenses exceed current revenues. This is not a new development, however, as it appears that TSI's financials have been in a deficit position since at least February 2002. During the current year, July through November 2002, TSI's expenses have exceeded revenues by $134,358, after adjusting for depreciation costs. As seen in Table 7, Annual Expense & Revenue Totals, and depicted in the graph at the bottom of that table, these operating losses began during FY01/02, which coincides with the loss of the RTA service contracts. Between FY01/02 and the end of November 2002, TSI's operating losses have totaled approximately $291,000, and, if projected straight-line through June 30, 2003, these losses would total over $479,000. The obvious question is how long TSI can sustain such losses? The answer to this lies in the organization's unrestricted reserve funds, which are difficult to discern from the organization's audited financials.' In the course of this audit, we have been told that TSI had unrestricted reserves of about $238,000 as of October 2002. If this were the case and TSI's operating losses continued at the rate of November 2002 — which saw an operating loss of about $33,400 — TSI would exhaust its reserve funds in April 2003. As we are not qualified to address accounting issues, it is recommended that a formal opinion be sought regarding the balance of remaining unrestricted reserves as of December 31, 2002, so that the TSI Board has accurate information on which to base its decisions. Recommendation: Obtain accounting opinion on remaining financial reserves as of 12/31/02 to guide Board decision making. 'As of 1/13/03, the audited financials for June 30, 2002, are reportedly not yet completed and have not been available to this audit. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 35 Table 7 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Financial Analysis: Annual Exp & Rev Totals Total Admin Admin OH Fiscal Period Total Expenses Expenses Total Revenues Net Gain/Loss Percentage FY 96197 $627,114 $133,298 21.26% FY 97198 $905,350 $148,293 1638% FY98/99 $1,082,990 $157,830 $1,256987 $173,997 14.57% FY 99/00 $1,393,524 $175,110 12.57% FY 00/01 $1,732,277 $188,201 $1,741,663 $9,386 10.86% FY 01102 $1,503,267 $157,814 $1,346,541 ($156,726) 10.50% FY 02103 [1] $1,090,214 $155,590 $767,755 ($322,459) 14.27% Note: All revenue figures are less capital revenues. All expense figures are less depreciation costs. [1] Annual figures are straight-line projections based on 5 month figures. Dollars 1800000 1600000 1400000 — 1',u. u — 030000 800000 600000 4000 0 ca 0) ER } Fiscal Years Costand RevenueIr.eadfi --sr 8 -dotal Expenses — II—Total Adrnin en # T al Revenues Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 36 Management Response To Operating Losses In the face of such losses, it is reasonable to question management's actions to minimize such losses and to develop new sources of revenue. Response to these losses was most likely delayed and not as focused as it could have been since these losses became most apparent during a period of management transition between TSI's long-time Executive Director and a new Interim Director as well as during a complete change -over of TSI's primary administrative staff. The former Executive Director left in February 2002 and the current Executive Director began on an interim basis in early April 2002 and assumed the Executive Director position formally on April 19. We have attempted to determine whether fixed costs and administrative expenses have been appropriately reduced in response to the declining revenues over the past 18 months. Table 7 includes the administrative expenses of TSI for the current period and the past 6 years. These figures show that administrative costs increased only moderately during TSI's revenue growth in fiscal years 98/99, 99/00 and 00/01 and have declined slightly since. A review of TSI's administrative costs has identified no unnecessary expense items which could be reduced to effect a significant reduction in administrative expenses. Management has also taken actions recently to eliminate services which were deemed to be unproductive or being operated at a loss [operating costs exceeding invoiced revenues]. The South Loop service, for example, ceased service at the end of October 2002 and some Inland Regional Center clients were dropped December 31, 2002. Such efforts, while eliminating some operating costs, do little to reduce fixed costs and simultaneously reduce revenues. Finally, in the face of these significant revenue reductions and operating losses, only minimal efforts have been made to develop new service contracts or to improve the reimbursement terms of the few existing contracts. TSI management recently met with the Inland Regional Center to request an increase in the rates being paid for those services and it is yet unknown whether an increase will be granted [and the increase may not actually be sufficient to cover TSI's real costs of providing these services — see below]. Management has focused significant attention on achieving the reinstatement of Local Transportation Funding [LTF] from RTA and succeeded in obtaining Measure A funding from the RCTC without a match requirement for this FY02/03 year. However, no new funding sources have been developed and no strategic initiatives have been undertaken to define the mission and business of TSI in a manner which would return this organization to financial health. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 37 Project Expenses Versus Billings Another way to look at the issue of continuing operating losses is to question whether it is costing TSI more to provide its transportation services than it is charging its contracted agencies on a total program basis and specifically for each contracted service. In general, the obvious answer to this question is "of course," however, this should not the case for "fee for service" contracts such as those operated for the Inland Regional Center and Friends of Moreno Valley. To estimate what it is actually costing TSI to provide each of these services, a "three -variable model" can be applied to TSI's operating and financial data. This model allocates actual operating and administrative costs between the categories of fixed costs, hourly costs and "wheel" or mileage -based costs and then divides these costs proportionally to the individual services on the basis, respectively, of Peak Vehicles, Vehicle Service Hours and Vehicle Service Miles. Table 8, Financial Analysis: Allocation of Expenses, shows the allocation of TSI's Operating and Administrative Expenses for the period July through September 2002 to the three Expense Classes used in the three variable model:2 The total costs by Expense Class are than carried over to Table 9, Financial Analysis: Cost Allocation Model, where the per unit cost factors are determined on the basis of the total peak vehicles, Vehicle Service Hours and Vehicle Service Miles operated in the same July — September period. In the bottom half of Table 9, the vehicles, hours and miles incurred in operating each of the four primary TSI services are used by the model to estimate the actual costs of each of these services. For the Inland Regional Center service, for example, the model estimates that the actual operating and administrative cost of this service to TSI was $183,©84, TSI's financials for this same period calculated this same cost at $166,048, or $17,036 less than the model, and IRC was actually invoiced $107,497 for service during these three months. According to the model's estimates, the IRC service cost Transportation Specialists over $75,000 more to provide than they were able to invoice IRC for these services. It should also be noted that the cost model resulted in a cost per Vehicle Service Hour of $42.71 for this IRC service, as compared to the $33.84 TSI believes this service to cost per hour. For the other three services, the model estimates that the Friends of Moreno Valley service costs TSI slightly more to administer and operate than TSI receives in reimbursement — $19,582 versus $16,012, and found that TSI's financials resulted in about the same total cost for the Jurupa Shuttle and actually a slightly higher total cost for the InterLINK service. Note that Depreciation costs are not included, as these are non -cash transactions. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc, Page 38 Table 8 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Financial Analysis: Allocation of Expenses Expense Classes Total Cost Short -Term Operating Operating Expense Category Thru 9130102 Fixed Hourly Mileage 'Operating Expenses Salaries & Wagcs Drivers $89,245 $89,245 Taxes on Payroll- Oper $11,607 $11,607 Worker's Comp- Operating $7,905 $7,905 oil & Fuel $32,791 $32,791 Vehicle Insurance $43,971 $43,971 Vehicle Licenzes $680 $680 Vehicle Maintenance $28,257 $28,257 Drivers Uniforms $1,498 $1,498 Radios $2,561 $2,561 Insurance- Health $6,657 $6,657 Operations - Other Expenses $325 $325 Recruitment[Training $300 $300 Advertising $612 $612 Insurance - Life Ops $539 $539 Operations- Drug Testing $361 $361 Operations- Miileege $128 $128 Facility Maint & Repairs $0 $0 Security $84 $84 Salaries & Wages- Dispatch $8,252 $8,252 Uriiities $1,262 $1,262 Administratve Expenses Salary- Executive Director Salary - Administrative Fringe Benefits Accounting Insurance- Life Admin Worker's Comp- Admin General Insurance insurance - Medical Taxes & Licerr= Office Equipment/Rental/Maint Office Expense Payroll Processing Fees Janitorial Xerox Taxes on Payroll- Admin Telephone Untilities $15,077 $15,077 $10,895 $10,895 $4,230 $4,230 $1,250 $1,250 $526 $526 $123 $123 $765 $765 $1,428 $1,428 $0 $0 $1,006 $1,006 $1,385 $1,385 $771 $771 $300 $300 $'144 $444 $2,096 $2,096 $755 $755 $96 $96 $278,182 $90,030 $126,976 $61,176 Page 39 Table 9 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Financial Analysis: Cost Allocation Model Total Allocated Cost Total TSI Operations July - Sep 2002 Total Vehicles in Peak Operation Allocated Cost Per Peak Vehicle Total Vehicle Service Hours Operated Allocated Cost Per Vehicle Service Hour Total Vehicle Service Miles Operated Allocated Cost Per Vehicle Service Mile Short -Term Fixed $90,030 13 $6,925.38 Operating Hourly $126,976 6242.3 $20.34 inland Valley Regional Center I nterL1 N K Operating Mileage $61,176 132715 $0.46 Jurupa Senior Shuttle Friends of Moreno Valley Operating Data Through 9130/02 Peak Vehicles Total VSH Total VSM Allocated Costs Peak Vehicles VSH VSM Subtotal Allocated Cost Per Vehicle Service Hour 8 4287 87813 $55,403 $87,203 $40,478 $183,084 $42.71 3 1185.3 32539 $20, 776 $24,110 $14,999 $59,886 $50.52 1 323.6 4604 $6,925 $6,582 $2,122 $15,630 $48.30 1 446.4 7759 $6,925 $9,080 $3,577 $19,582 $43.87 Project Cost Per TSI Financials Total Project Revenues Per Financials $166,048 $66,893 $107,497 $15,855 $16,012 $12,003 Cost Variance Between. Financials and Model Variance Between Cost per Financials and Revenues Variance Between Cost per Model and Revenues ($17,036) $7,007 ($58,551) ($75,587) $225 ($3,570) ($4,009) ($7,579) Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 40 The model show that the IRC services, far from paying their costs, are being heavily subsidized by the other TSI services and funding sources, to the tune of $75,587 from July through September 2002. The mod& also found that operation of the Friends of Moreno Valley service also cost TSI more than it was compensated, by an amount of about $7,579. During this same period, TSI incurred an operating loss of just over $86,000. On their face, these results appear to suggest that elimination of the IRC service, since it was operated at a loss of $75,000 during a period when TSI incurred a total operating loss of $86,000, could bring the organization close to a break - ever position. This impression is misleading in that, at least in the short-term, the fixed costs of facility, administration and management that are presently allocated to the Inland Regional Center service would remain, requiring the remaining projects to support increasing shares of these costs. As noted earlier, TSI management has proposed a rate increase of 15 - 18% to Inland Regional Center and has yet to receive a response. While the model's calculations suggest that this level of increase would still not bring the IRC compensation to a break-even position, the results would be a significant improvement to the current situation and might permit continuance of the IRC service in conjunction with other actions to enhance revenues. Three comments about this three -variable model and its results. First, the model is based on rough cost figures and does involve some assumptions in the allocation of costs between Expense Classes, however, the results will not materially change without major movement of costs between categories. Second, these estimated costs are increased somewhat by the reductions which have occurred in TSI services, which causes these costs to be spread across a smaller program of services, Lastly, we have not considered other sources of revenue which might apply against these services, such as Office on Aging subsidies. What Do These Analyses Tell Us? These analyses give us the following parameters to TSI's present situation: • According to the available records, TSI has operated for at more than a year with monthly operating losses, which have been covered from reserves. During this period, little has been done to identify and make the fundamental changes in mission, organization and funding needed to remedy this situation. • Substantial new revenues need to be identified and begin to be felt in TSI's accounts possibly as soon as April 2003 to prevent deficit operations which cannot be covered from funding reserves; • There are no further service or administrative cost reductions which are apparent which could bring TSI to a break-even financial position Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 41 and leave the organization in a position to continue effective operations nor would additional service cuts have any significant impact on the losses being incurred; and • The rates of reimbursement for the transportation services which TSI continues to operate should be thoroughly reviewed, together with associated subsidies, to ensure that fee -for -service contracts bear their appropriate share of total costs. How About Quick Fixes? Measure A and LTF Given the need noted immediately above for quick infusion of revenues into TSI, the only realistic sources are increased Measure A grant funds from RCTC and reinstatement of Local Transportation Funds from RTA. In the current FY02/03 year, Measure A funding has been approved totaling $140,088 versus $186,000 in Measure A during FY01/02. And LTF funding amounted to $84,000 in FY01/02 but was discontinued in FY02/03. With the exception of an "out of the blue" philanthropist, these are the only realistic sources of immediate funding within the next 5 months — new services, for example, would require at least that period to be initiated and cash flow might require another 60 to 90 days. To secure either increased Measure A funds or reinstated LTF, Transportation Specialists would have to present a service plan to RCTC and RTA which promised to immediately deliver transportation services deemed essential to these agencies: provision of guaranteed ADA over -flow, on -call or subscription trips, immediate expansion of Jurupa Shuttle services or possibly some other transportation service targeting seniors in a manner which is importantly different from RTA services. This would have to be a convincing presentation of TSI capabilities to deliver such services with a rapid implementation schedule. Further, with respect to Measure A funds, ROTC would need to be willing to provide these funds without the usual 50 percent match, since TSl has little general funding to identify as match. What's Needed To Keep TSI Afloat? This is a difficult number to project. Through November, ROTC had provided a total of $71,750 in Measure A funding to TSI, yet the financials still showed an operating loss of $134,358. In November, TSI's operating loss [net of depreciation costs] was $33,436. At this rate, TSI could incur additional losses of almost $190,000 from December 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. For planning purposes, let's make two assumptions: 1. TSI's reserves will cover operating losses through April 2003; and Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 42 2. Interim support for TSI is needed only through June 30, 2003, when the current funding year ends and new programs can be initiated. if TSI's losses were to continue at a rate of $33,436 through the end of June, their loss exposure for May and June would total about $67,000. There are several actions TSI can take immediately to reduce costs or increase revenues: • Leave Transportation Supervisor Position Vacant: Savings = $13,000. It is our understanding that the current Supervisor has recently resigned. Rather than immediately filling this position, leave the position vacant until TSI's direction and future are more defined, If left vacant through the end of June, this would result in a cost savings of just over $13,000 [salary plus taxes, WC and health insurance]. • Follow -Up on IRC Compensation Request: Increase Revenues $31,500. TSI management has requested an increase of 15 - 18% in the rates of reimbursement paid by IRC. If instituted February 1, a 5 - month increase in the IRC rates of 18% would produce $31,500 in added IRC revenues. • Institute Passenger Donation Campaign: Increased Revenues = $3,000. In its Measure A grant application for the current year, TSI projected passenger donation receipts of $1,284 per month. Through November, actual passenger donations have averaged only $492 per month. While making sure not to be heavy-handed, TSI might consider reformatting its donation approach so that passengers understand how important these donations are in support of the services. There are certainly other cost savings and revenue actions which can be taken, yet these three actions alone could produce savings and revenue increases totaling $47,500, which would reduce the projected operating loss for May -June from $67,000 to $19,500. With a minimal amount of financial support, then, Transportation Specialists can be supported through the end of the current fiscal year. The real question is whether the organization is committed and nimble enough to redefine its mission and develop and implement a new business model within the next 5 months. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 43 SECTION 5: AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW The preceding pages have presented and suggested a number of recommended actions, some to clean up administrative procedures and correctly report operating statistics, others to set new direction for this organization and address the critical financial situation. Since there is an obvious priority to addressing this financial situation and ensuring TSI's survival, this section will present those recommendations first, followed by a recap of the other administrative and operational recommendations presented throughout this audit report. It should be restated that timing is of the essence in responding to the challenges which face Transportation Specialists. Fund reserves are almost depleted and there are few options for new funding without a clear direction and provision of transportation services which can at least pay their own cost. If corrective actions are not taken by July 1, 2003, TSI will cease to be financially viable and consideration must be given to dissolving the organization. RECREATING AND REINVIGORATING TSI 1. Redefine TSI's Focus and Business Model. TSI's mission is presently to provide "...transportation related services to those in need." While that broad mission allows TSI to engage in almost any area of transportation, TSI needs to decide where it will focus its efforts — with particular attention to transportation needs which are not well -served by public transit or by for-profit providers. TSI should make use of this opportunity to redefine the transportation services it seeks to provide rather than simply compete for public transit contracts against private companies with broad resources. A strong consideration needs to be the identification of transportation needs which government is willing to support. Going forward, TSI must cover the full costs of providing its services and cannot donate services or operate at a loss. One major area of transportation which is growing in attention is the provision of services targeted at senior citizens who can no longer drive [or, perhaps, "should no longer drive"] and who do not know how to use public transit, cannot use it for the desired trip, or require more assistance than public transit can provide. These seniors, for example, may be too frail to use regular transit but are not sufficiently disabled to qualify for ADA paratransit services. Providing senior transportation should be one possible focus for the "new" Transportation Specialists. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 44 Other possible target markets might be greater service to clientele requiring highly personalized services — like Inland Regional Center's clients -- or provision of specialized, on -demand services like over -flow or subscription ADA paratranst service. 2. Reestablish TSI's Corporate Leadership. Nonprofit organizations take on the personalities of their volunteer and paid staff. It seems fair to say that TSI, through 2001, was a "staff -directed" organization. That is, it had a committed, strong Executive Director who recommended policies and programs for Board consideration. With a new Executive Director and problems of the current magnitude, we would recommend that the TSI Board needs to be expanded and to take a stronger, more active role in defining the organization's direction and helping to develop the plans for achieving its goals. This is not intended at all as a criticism of current management or leadership — the situations have changed and one person — the Executive Director — cannot be expected to resolve these issues alone. 3. Develop Strategic Partnerships For Corporate Direction & Service Provision. TSI was originally created by a consortium of community organizations who, during the early years, had permanent membership on TSI's Board and a stake in the success of the organization. It is recommended that TSI look back to this model and involve its funding agencies and service clients in the development of the organization's strategic direction and delivery of services. While it might be cumbersome to have a Board of 21 Directors [which would be allowed under TSI's Bylaws] and some agencies might perceive a conflict in sitting as an active Director, other options for participation might be the creation of a Technical Advisory Committee or "Partners Forum" which would meet on a regular basis to review and comment on operating plans and direction. 4. Revisit Services Qualifying For Local Trans ortation Fundin As noted in Section 2, this funding to the TSI program ceased at the end of the FY01/02 year, based on a decision that RTA's expansion of regular transit and ADA paratransit services eliminated the situations in which TSI's InterLlNK and South Loop services were meeting transportation needs unable to be accommodated by RTA. Also noted above, termination of this funding eliminated TSI's largest single source of Measure A matching funds. While expansion of RTA services may, indeed, provide public transit service coverage throughout the unincorporated and remote areas formerly only served by TSI's services, TSI provides the RTA with a resource for the provision of peak - period and overflow ADA paratransit services which may be cost -competitive and more flexible than other RTA resources. TSI's capability to provide quality ADA paratransit services represents the organization's most valuable option to effect a short-term increase in revenues and to justify a resumption of LTF funding. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 45 TSI, for its part, needs to reassess its decision to cease the out -of -county services which were offered under the terminated South Loop service as these were, in fact, services which RTC could not provide. Similarly, TSI needs to evaluate its InterLINK service to focus that service on markets and clients not able to be effectively served by RTA. TSI cannot expect RTA or RCTC to simply provide funding upon request - TSI must present legitimate service needs and effective plans for providing responsive services in order to gain funding support. 5, Find What Works, Then Expand It. TSI's most successful present service might be the Jurupa Senior Shuttle. This service suffers reportedly from lack of passenger capacity. This service is also receives the support of RCTC and RTA as it effectively meets trip needs which otherwise would fall on the Jurupa Dial -A -Ride. Initial review of the Jurupa Shuttle indicates the potential for reformatting the Jurupa Shuttle as a Community Fixed Route to achieve increased ridership and to make this service easier for seniors to use. Although the Jurupa Shuttle operates on an hourly basis and generally follows the same route, this route is not published nor are stops identified in a manner which would allow seniors to use this service without having to make an advance reservation for service with the TSl scheduler. Such changes might require adding a second vehicle or using a vehicle with larger passenger capacity, yet increased service delivery could justify increased funding from RCTC and RTA. As indicated by the heading above, the Jurupa Shuttle might constitute a model to be applied elsewhere in the county. Increasingly, the South County is attracting seniors to its retirement communities. These residents may also represent an emerging market for TSI services. OPERATIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS Organizational Overview Corporate Organization Correct Agent For Service with California Secretary of State by filing a revised form SO.100, Statement By Domestic Nonprofit Corporation. Article of lnco poration & Bylaws Delete all reference to "Meditrans" name on information materials to cease the use of this name and to eliminate client confusion. Review and revise Bylaws to reflect current Articles of incorporation and administrative practices. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 46 Amend Bylaws to institute specific terms for Directors and Officers. Consider placing a limit on terms of officers to encourage new leadership. Create a Corporate Binder to organize and safeguard important Corporate Documents. Governance Aggressively recruit and elect new Directors to the TSI Board and consider increasing the number of Directors to spread governance responsibilities. Establish a regular day and time for Board Meetings and publish a meeting calendar at the start of each fiscal year. Amend the Bylaws to require an Annual Meeting. Specify that elections will take place at this meeting. Develop and institute a monthly Board Report to keep Directors and Officers current on organizational performance, administration and potential issues. Institute an annual report summarizing the TSI's mission, programs, finances and performance. Ensure that Board Minutes and attached documentation are maintained and safeguarded in a Minute Binder. Ensure that Minutes are drafted immediately following Board Meetings to facilitate greatest accuracy. Require signing of Minutes by Corporate Secretary/Treasurer. Long-RariRe or Strategic Planning Develop a basic Strategic Plan for TSI, including input from funding agencies and community agencies and partner. Ensure that this Plan begins with clarifying the organization's purpose and mission. Share this Strategic Plan with TSI staff, funding agencies and community agencies. Organization and Staffin Revise organizational chart to clarify lines of authority. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 47 Revise Job Descriptions for the Transportation Supervisor and Dispatch Supervisor to more correctly describe their respective tasks and responsibilities. Identify training opportunities which would enable existing staff to gain needed knowledge to improve performance in their existing positions. When opportunities arise in seeking new staff or new Directors, seek individuals with experience in the management of private, nonprofit corporations and specialized areas of expertise such as grant writing and fund development. Review and revised staff job descriptions to add needed functional areas and job tasks with commensurate requirements for experience and education. Funding Source Review Consider limiting use of OoA senior subsidy to Jurupa Senior Shuttle and instituting passenger fares on the InterLINK services to increase passenger revenues. Increase marketing of Jurupa Senior Shuttle and emphasis of community fixed route features of this program to increase efficiency and ridership. Analysis of Services And Programs Operational Data Ensure preparation of monthly operating data on a timely basis following the close of each month. Organize and maintain computer records for easy access. Maintain paper report copies in binders or files by year. Archive operating data and records for completed fiscal years away from active work areas. Redesign driver manifests to provide additional space for data entry and for recording events which take the vehicle out of service, place the vehicle into another route or switch vehicles in the middle of service run. Train drivers on importance of accurate data recording to reduce the incidence of illegible entries and incomplete record keeping. Record computations on manifests and forms during reconciliation and data entry to facilitate double-checking computations and easy audit of data process. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc. Page 48 Utilize proper definitions of Vehicle Service Hours and Miles. Verify and recompute, if needed, Vehicle Service Hours and Miles at least back to July 2002 using the correct data definitions for Vehicle Service Hours and Miles. Establish a single set of operating data records for use whenever reporting is required. Ensure that amended reports are submitted to all monitoring agencies when corrections are made to data. Conduct further investigation into cash deposit records to determine actual donation amounts for audited months. Ensure that donation envelopes are sealed when collected by the drivers and remain sealed until counted under 2 -person control in the TSI offices. Review of Service Performance Ensure that proper data definitions are adhered to for all transportation services operated by TSI. Develop and implement a program of operational improvements to shore up current transportation services. Audit Analysis And Findings Obtain accounting opinion on remaining financial reserves as of 12/31/02 to guide Board decision making. Management Audit of Transportation Specialists, Inc, Page 49 Appendix A Transportation Specialists, Inc. Operating Data [Based on RCTC Measure A Reports] South LooplInterLINK Service Jurupa Shuttle P xiod Pass Trips VS Hours VSMiles FareslCnn Pass Trips VS Hours Vatillrs Far oset n 02103 Sept 583 377.3 10305 480 333 108.7 1502 136 Aug 567 378.5 10607 498 309 104.8 1512 126 July 624 429.5 11527 407 _ 319 110.1 1590 130 iota' 02103 1774 1185.3 32539 1385 961 323.6 4604 392 01/02 June 561 494 11938 411 286 89 1174 118 May 599 736 17704 990 309 109 1212 95 Apr 617 767 19116 846 299 112 1142 105 Mar 574 912 17225 338 284 105 1288 75 Feb 904 936 18297 613 199 101 1195 91 Jan 916 741 17948 567 288 107 1077 123 Dec 961 488 12778 1313 265 76.5 1091 113 Nov 1174 544 14371 695 309 80.8 1031 194 Oct 1039 580 14496 593 350 83.5 1205 220 Sept 1105 773 11184 817 282 95 1323 197 Aug 1301 618 13509 564 351 106 1326 231 July 1157 685 15283 669 _ 350 105 1205 256 Total01/02 10908 8274 183849 8416 3572 1169.9 14269 1818 00/01 June 1406 536 15686 817 340 105 1301 197 May 1377 682 17844 564 348 101 1291 231 Apr 1043 647 17749 669 341 92 1571 256 Mar 1418 619 20177 1028 339 92 1698 255 Feb 1302 556 16777 1069 332 81 1350 268 Jan 1056 605 20230 728 318 84 1402 184 Dec 1245 551 18135 1063 240 80 1300 149 Nov 1456 516 25424 885 249 80 1064 207 Oct 1418 605 25230 728 318 99 1592 231 Sept 1660 799 24226 727 305 85 1795 235 Aug 1983 697 2512U 773 318 98 1840 256 July 1010 567 15508 602 229 86 1240 160 Total 00101 16374 7380 242206 9643 3677 1083 17444 2629 99/00 June 1611 708 17476 723 May 1149 723 16460 703 Apr 1348 698 16871 289 Mar 1836 721 13023 963 Feb 1502 689 19407 987 Jan 1251 633 16905 1038 Dec 1388 609 12570 847 Nov 1296 614 13872 955 Oct 1307 625 18103 977 Sept 1263 625 15490 1419 Aug 1449 658 16331 1045 July 1494 717 16366 977 Total 99100 16894 8020 192874 10923 98/99 June 1354 713 17982 963 May 1696 735 17604 1649 Apr 1632 5 2 17154 1428 Mar 1797 692 18344 1633 Feb 1501 681 16076 687 Jan 1589 684 17583 1368 Dec 1347 664 1 ft1C2d 941 NoV 1535 676 19298 797 Oct 1373 691 19501 762 Sept 1235 630 19973 356 Aug 974 630 19908 883 July 1035 660 20124 806 Total 98199 12386 6008 167829 8233 Friends of Moreno Valley Inland Valley Regional Center Period' Fuss Trips VS haute VSMiYes FaresVon i-ass Trots VS. Hrxa3 VSMiies 02103 Sept 304 128.2 2707 92 4935 1380 28351 Aug 346 157 2652 120 4910 1428 29630 July 281 161.2 2400 154 4909 1479 29832 TotaI02103 931 446.4 7759 366 14754 4287 87813 011112 June 281 131.4 2533 247 5633 871 17090 May 311 131.8 2684 205 5759 1362 16777 Apr 300 172.5 3033 234 5759 1293 17062 Mar 310 170 1898 248 5743 1221 16758 Feb 366 191 2873 226 5121 871 17090 Jan 291 155 2888 198 4994 899 17848 Dec 257 146.5 1777 248 4335 760 19076 Nov 308 142.5 2761 194 4977 986 19076 Oat 352 147.5 2191 235 4241 988 19199 Sept 307 155 1346 254 4679 798 18888 Aug 369 166 1472 235 5218 990 17683 July 352 154 2191 235 5081 1005 19199 Total01102 3804 1863.2 27647 2759 61540 12044 215746 00101 June 364 157.5 2888 192 4808 1005 19119 May 350 165 2372 284 4884 1027 15680 Apr 339 158 2308 285 4854 950 18083 Mar 375 163 2751 258 4870 930 20016 Feb 289 148 2570 239 4101 865 16048 Jan 329 154 3769 277 4641 977 18293 Oec 318 150.5 3105 233 4167 936 16399 Nov 359 151 3250 89 4639 930 23102 Oct 428 165 3514 207 5536 1030 20321 Sept 385 145 3132 296 5109 945 19296 Aug 407 166.8 2782 236 6019 946 16386 July 322 151 2712 247 4803 900 18625 Total00/01 4265 1874.8 35153 2843 26106 4751 99730 99/00 June 360 166 2480 236 5057 976 21322 May 347 160 2820 224 5942 1228 21685 Apr 362 146 2321 289 4891 864 18584 Mar 492 167 2512 224 5966 936 18452 Feb 430 165 4148 221 5912 948 18113 Jan 277 147 2685 250 4988 864 17485 Dec 262 148 2876 216 5966 936 18312 Nov 299 142.5 2685 252 5833 946 18113 Oct 349 161.7 3205 253 6707 963 19723 Sept 349 163 3050 210 6433 963 18996 Aug 429 157 3321 192 5800 1056 17867 July 348 161 3187 228 6526 1104 19302 Total99/00 4304 1884.2 35290 2795 70021 11782 227954 98199 June 412 145 3332 241 5863 949 19251 May 408 142 3522 171 5432 960 19086 Apr 277 143 3166 190 5853 1022 18914 Mar 339 151 3107 151 5844 903 17502 Feb 268 143 2814 147 5693 782 15946 Jan 269 148.5 31156 1235 5923 810 16720 Dec 287 153 2909 102 Nov 302 150 3067 135 Oct 327 160 3122 147 Sept 402 216 2997 141 Aug 424 156 3281 138 July 411 150 3286 151 Total96/99 4126 1855.5 37659 1837.5 34608 5426 40034 • AGENDA ITEM 9 • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Policy Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Budget BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the proposed Commission's Policy Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Budget. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The initial step in the budget process is to develop policy goals and objectives for the fiscal year. These goals and objectives are to be consistent with the Commission's overall strategic direction. Last year, one of the Commission's primary goals was to renew Measure "A" to allow the Commission to continue planning for the future of transportation in Riverside County. The citizens approved the Measure in November 2002. This year's goals and objectives prioritize the transition planning and the continued delivery of promises made to the citizens of the County of Riverside. Using the Commission's guiding principles, staff has updated the attached Goals and Objectives for the Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Budget. Attachment: Proposed Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Budget 385 • • • COMMISSION POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following material outlines those adopted policy goals and objectives as well as financial policies that have served as the framework for the work plan presented in the FY 2003-2004 Budget. Mobility The Riverside County Transportation Commission, in cooperation with local, state and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system that promotes efficient mobility both within the county and regionally. Following November's overwhelming passage of Measure "A" RCTC faces a year of transition with significant opportunities and challenges. • Prepare and adopt a transition plan to coordinate the two voter -approved Measure "A" Safes Tax Measures. Complete Tier 1 Environmental Analysis for the two internal CETAP corridors and obtain federal adoption of Records of Decision for both the Winchester to Temecula and Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore CETAP Corridors. • Support the CETAP process to examine and analyze route alternatives for the two intercounty corridors linking Riverside County to Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Actively participate in the OrangelRiverside Bi-County 91 Express Lanes Committee to facilitate near and long-term improvements to State Route 91; enhance intercounty public transit options and foster the development of a new corridor between the two counties. • Foster the effective and early implementation of the TUMF program to jump- start funding of needed transportation projects. • Assure the ongoing effectiveness of the short-range transit plan process and work with the county's eight transit operators to assure efficiency and effectiveness. • Coordinate regional transit connections among commuter rail, buses, and paratransit services to ensure convenient service for passengers. 386 Goods Movement • RCTC will work with federal, state and local governments to facilitate the movement of goods and services, within and through the county, recognizing the vital role mobility plays in the economic health of the county, the state, and the nation. • Work with county transportation commissions, local jurisdictions, and SCAG toward the implementation of a coordinated regional approach to increase rail and highway capacity for goods movement. ■ Seek funding to implement the Commission's approved, high -priority railroad grade separation priority list to mitigate the impact of increased goods movement demands on the transportation system with special emphasis on obtaining. recognition as part of the reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Act. Promote the use of rail corridors (including the Riverside -Perris -Hemet -San Jacinto Line within funding constraints) as an alternative to trucks for the movement of freight within the County and the region. • Support the efficient use of March Air Reserve Base to address regional air freight demand and resulting ground access infrastructure needs ■ Advocate inclusion of goods movement policies and projects for Southern California in the reauthorization of the federal transportation act. Congestion Relief and Safety Improvements Selection of projects and programming of funds by ROTC will be done with a view toward promoting traffic flow, improved safety, and reducing congested traffic corridors. • Work with local jurisdictions and Caltrans to develop mitigation measures and strategies to address congested corridors and areas impacted by construction. • Provide innovative commuter rideshare programs to reduce single occupant vehicle trips and coordinate with other regional rideshare service providers to address inter -county commute trips. • Continue to work with state and federal agencies to program and construct projects in the State Transportation Improvement Program, the Measure "A" Program and other high priority projects. • Work with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol to continue providing a 387 • • • motorist aid system which includes a call box program and freeway service patrol program including temporary services in freeway construction zones. Air Quality RCTC's transportation planning will be designed to achieve clean air standards while fostering economic growth and improving quality of life. ■ Work with the metropolitan planning organization, sub -regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to develop and implement a regional transportation plan that meets conformity guidelines. • Work with the SCAQMD to coordinate our project implementation with its regional air quality goals. ■ Support outreach and educational programs that promote voluntary ridesharing. • Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology. • Encourage the purchase of clean fuel buses by transit operators and the conversion to clean fuels for other transit vehicles. • Promote the reduction of mobile source emissions through proactive participation in various air quality forums. Economic Development Transportation decisions will consider the economic benefits derived from any improvement, and where feasible and practical, will pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development. • Support local agencies in the design and construction of interchanges that are in proximity to regional economic centers and developments_ Foster the development of transportation technology research, education and training efforts of public institutions within Riverside County. • Support local projects, consistent with countywide transportation goals, which enhance business development, local employment and area tourism. 388 Interrodalism and Accessibility Serve county residents, where economically feasible, by developing transportation alternatives that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens. • Work with transit providers and local social service agencies to provide specialized transit service to meet a broad spectrum of socio-economic transit needs. • Implement the Commission's commuter rail short-range transit plan and the SCRRA long-range strategic plan for expansion of the commuter rail system benefiting Riverside County constituents. • Participate in the study of high-speed rail options and support efforts for eventual implementation of a statewide high-speed rail system with emphasis on the pilot project being in Southern California and including the integration of existing rail passenger services. Technological innovation Advocate the development and use of advanced technologies for transportation applications that are affordable and practical. • Encourage the development of a regional smart -card to increase the level of convenience for transit users. • Continue development, in partnership with Caltrans and San Bernardino Associated Governments, of the Inland Empire Transportation Management Center and seek funding for its construction. Public and Agency Communications Provide timely, informative and accurate information to encourage informed public and agency participation in the Commission's decision -making processes. • Promote a close working relationship with news and civic entities to increase interest in, and understanding of, transportation and related issues. • Enhance the provision of public information through various forms of communications (e.g., internet, cable TV, speakers' bureau, print media, etc). • • 389 FINANCIAL POLICIES Operating Budget Policies The Commission will budget no more than one percent of Measure "A" Sales Tax Revenue for administrative salaries and benefits. • Administration costs will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but not to exceed four percent of Measure "A" Sales Tax Revenues (inclusive of the one- percent salary limitation). • Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi -year projects based on best estimates, with the understanding that to the extent actuals vary from those estimates, and the project is ongoing, adjustments will be made on an ongoing basis. • The fiscal capita! budget should be consistent with the strategic plan with deviations appropriately noted, explained, and justified. Revenue Policies • Sales tax revenue projections will be revised bi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data. Staff may adjust annual amounts to reflect the most current economic trends_ • Federal and state matching funds will be used where possible to supplement the use of local funding sources. Debt Management Policies • The Commission will maintain 2x -debt ratio coverage on all senior debt. Debt issuance will be for major capital projects including engineering, construction, and right of way. Operating requirements must be from current ongoing revenues. • Costs of issuance including the standard underwriter's discount will not exceed 2%.. • While it is the intent of the Commission to establish a cash debt reserve for long term bond issuance, obtaining surety bonds can be obtained when beneficial to the Commission. 390 Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies • The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report compliant with GASB 34. • An audit is to be conducted annually on Commission accounting books and records. As long as the Commission has outstanding bonds, an independent accounting firm must conduct the audit. Capital Planning and Programming Policies • Established priorities will be reviewed annually via a series of workshops and/or policy maker retreat. Reserve Policies • The Commission will maintain a cash reserve at least equal to five percent of annual revenues (exclusive of reimbursements/matching funds), Cash Management/Investment Policies Where possible, the Commission well encourage receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts. Balances in the bank operating account will be maintained at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures. Idle funds will be invested per the Commission's established investment policy emphasizing in order of priority: 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) yield. • Cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultants will be completed in an expeditious and timely manner. Human Resources Management • Commission staffing levels will be consistent with the intent of its enabling legislation, which envisioned a small, but effective staff. • Consultants will be used to augment staff efforts as much as possible to support programs or work loads, which do not appear to be of a permanent nature. 391 • AGENDA ITEM 10 • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAIVSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: March 12, 2003 TO: FROM: Riverside County Transportation Commission Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: SUBJECT: Eric Haley, Executive Director SB 821 Extension Streamlining BUDGET AND IMPL EMENTA TION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt the policy regarding project extensions for the Commission's SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. BACKGROUND INFORMA TION: At the October 28, 2002 Budget and Implementation Committee meeting, several questions were raised by Commissioners on the policy to grant extensions to complete projects funded under the Commission's SB 821 program. Some of the issues raised included: 1) What are the current policies on granting extensions? 2) Which agency is the worst offender? 3) How often are extensions granted? 4) Has anyone taken a recent look at revising the policy? 5) What would happen to the funds allocated to a city/county if the funds were taken away? 6) Do we allocate interest to the city/county while the funds are in reserve? The Committee expressed their concerns and felt that the issue of timely completion of projects should be reviewed again. Staff informed the Committee that it would take their concerns to the next Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting to develop a course of action. Staff presented the Commissioners' concerns to the TAC at its November 18, 2002 meeting. The TAC directed staff to develop a recommendation for their consideration to address the numerous SB 821 project extension requests. Staff reviewed the project delivery history of the projects funded under the SB 821 program from FY 1997-98 through FY 2001-02, and presented its findings to the TAC at its meeting on February 10, 2003. The following is a summary of the data by fiscal year and the length of time necessary to complete all of the projects: 392 Total # Claimed in Year Projects 1" yr. 2" yr. 3' yr. 4'' yr. 5"' yr. OfS FY 1997-98 20* 4 11 2 1 1 0 FY 1998-99 21" 6 13 0 0 1 0 FY 1999-00 11 1 6 0 2 2 FY 2000-01 22 4 13 5 0 FY 2001-02 19 6 8 0 -- 5 Totals 93 21 51 7 3 2 7 One project abandoned by City of Norco. One project abandoned by Riverside County. To date, 79% of the projects were claimed within two years of the award and 87% were claimed within three years. It does not appear that any of the outstanding projects are tied to any federal funding. As a reminder, current Commission policy is to require completion or contract award of the project within the fiscal year. There are no prohibitions on the number of requests for time extensions. It was staff's recommendation to adopt a policy that would grant an agency twenty-four (24) months from the time of the allocation to complete the project using local forces or award a construction contract. There would be no time extensions granted unless the project was part of a larger, federally funded project, which had been delayed beyond the agency's control. Projects not completed or awarded within the twenty-four months would be deleted from the program, and the funds would be reprogrammed in the next fiscal year. The TAC members discussed staff's recommendation at length, and although there were some concerns about the potential loss of funds, it was the consensus of the Committee to approve the staff recommendation and forward to the Commission for consideration. As mentioned above, four cities were concerned about the possibility of losing funds. Staff explained that a city could always re -apply for funding during the next cycle. Also, several committee members felt that projects should be ready to go at the time of application, and, if a project could not be completed within two years, it should not tie up current dollars that could be used by other agencies. The Budget and Implementation Committee's recommendation was slightly different. The Committee's recommended policy would also allow projects requiring coordination with another public agency (e.g. Caltrans, water district) that had been delayed beyond the agency's control, the opportunity to receive one twelve-month extension, if necessary. Attachment: SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Recommended Policy • 393 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM Recommended Policy An agency will have twenty-four (24) months from the time of the allocation to complete the project using local forces or award a construction contract. There will be no time extensions granted unless the project is part of a larger, federally funded project, which has been delayed beyond the agency's control. Also, projects requiring coordination with another public agency that had been delayed beyond the agency's control may receive one twelve-month extension, if necessary. Projects not completed or awarded within the twenty-four months will be deleted from the program, and the funds will be reprogrammed in the next fiscal year's SB 821 Program. 394 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE March 1 2, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Moreno Valley -San Bernardino County CETAP Ad Hoc Policy Committee Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Initiation of the CEQA Process on the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County CETAP Corridor MORENO VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CETAP AD HOC POLICY COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION_ This item is for the Commission to: 1) Endorse the release of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the preservation of right-of-way for potential new north -south transportation facilities linking Riverside/Moreno Valley with the East Valley of San Bernardino County; and, 2) Reduce the identified budget for work on this corridor from $2,010,450 to $1,187,000. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In Fall 2000, RCTC initiated a study in conjunction with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) on potential new transportation corridors between Riverside/Moreno Valley and the East Valley of San Bernardino County. A bi-county policy committee vvas established to guide the process. Members include elected representatives of the two counties and the involved cities. The RCTC representatives on this Committee include Commissioners Ashley, Busch, Buster, Moore, and West. The SANBAG representatives include Deirdre Bennett, Colton; Herman Hilkey, Grand Terrace; Bob Ziprick, Loma Linda; Gary George, Redlands; Susan Lien, San Bernardino; Dick Riddell, Yucaipa and Dennis Hansberger, County District 3. The SANBAG Board approved $250,000 for this effort, and the San Bernardino County cities have contributed a proportionate share, based on population, consisting of an additional $250,000. 395 A set of initial transportation corridor "alternatives" was defined in early 2001, and public workshops were held in April 2001 to provide the potentially affected communities with an opportunity for direct input. In December 2001 the Commission identified Alternative 1 as the preferred alternative for this corridor. This alternative would provide a connection between the SR 6011-215 interchange in Box Springs with Barton Road, connecting to 1-10 via existing California Street in San Bernardino County. Ancillary elements of the project would also include the preservation of right-of-way for connections to this core facility from other arterial roadways in the Reche Canyon area, such as Reche Canyon Road, Reche Vista Avenue and Pigeon Pass Road. An additional alignment added since the initial public workshops is a connection between Pigeon Pass Road in Moreno Valley, following Main Street at the County Line, and continuing on Riverside Avenue to Interstate 10, Attachment A to this agenda item describes the various alignments and their features, such as the number of lanes and type of facilities envisioned that will be studied in the EIR. A map of the proposed alignments is included as Attachment B. The action addressed by the EIR would be the preservation of right-of-way for the identified alignments. This would enable the involved cities and the two counties to amend their General Plan Circulation Elements to incorporate the studied alignments without having to prepare their own EIRs. Additional CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation will be required to advance these facilities further. Any discussions with local jurisdictions on the funding of further project development activities, right-of-way acquisition, and construction would also come at a later time, A public outreach effort will be included as part of ERR preparation. The original budget for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor was identified as $2,055,000. This early cost estimate assumed preparation of a federal NEPA document. Since the process has been underway, it was subsequently decided by both Boards that a CEQA document should be pursued for this corridor. The required level of work is substantially less for an EIR and therefore the revised budget for this corridor has dropped to $1,187,000. An action similar to that proposed by this agenda item is anticipated by SANBAG at its March meeting. Attachments: 1) Project Description of the Two -County Corridor Study 2) Map of Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor • 396 'B'w[7X'C]CI'�f'i'Y (l7HHliiiett STtr V • • • Drp(i Project Description PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR THE TWO -COUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY Background of the Two -County Corridor Study Transportation agencies in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties have initiated a major effort to improve transportation between the two counties The Two -County Corridor Study focuses on the area generally bounded by Interstate 10, Interstate 215, and State Route 60 The main purpose of the Two - County Corridor Study is to identify specific transportation solutions that can help improve mobility between State Route 60 and Interstate 10, with the specific intent of reserving right-of-way for the "preferred alternative " Construction -level environmental documentation will be prepared at a later dale The preferred alternative is intended to accommodate transit vehicles as well as passenger cars The effort is berngtointly managed by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) These agencies are serving as joint lead agencies for the Environmental Impact Report fhe Two -County Corridor Study was initiated in Fall, 2000 Two committees were identified to guide the study, one involving a policy group of elected officials and the other a technical group of -engineers and planners to direct the analysis Public meetings were held in Moreno Valley and in San Bernardino County in Apnl 2001 to obtain input f'roni residents, businesses, and other stakeholders in the area Subsequent discussions were held at the technical and policy levels to determine how to proceed from that point on It was determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EER) would be prepared to identify the right-of-way to be preserved Project Description ['lie "project" to be evaluated in the EIR is as follows Preservation of right-of-way for a new transportation corridor that could ultimately connect the SR -60/1- 215 interchange in Box Springs (at the west end of Moreno Valley) with Barton Road, connecting to 1-10 via existing planned California Street This will be referred to as the "core" facility Ancillary elements of the project would include the preservation of right-of-way for connections to this core facility from other arterial roadways in the Reche Canyon area, such as Reche Canyon Road, Reche Vista Ave , and Pigeon Pass Road This EIR covers only the preservation of nght-of-way for the core facility or ancillary elements so that all these alignments may be included in the circulation elements of the appropriate local General Plans Some of the ancillary facilities are already included in local General Plans, but portions of their alignments niay need to be refined to coordinate with the location of the core facility Identification of the alignment on a General Plan does not necessarily mean that there is funding for such a facility, nor does it suggest the sequencing or phasing of facility construction Some of the basic design criteria for the core facility include the following O Facility type - s limited access expressway from [-215 to Barton Road, with intersections or interchanges at 1-215, Pigeon Pass Road, Riche Canyon Road, and Barton Road. and an arterial roadway from Barton Road to I-10, following California Street A four -lane tunnel (two tubes of two lanes each) would be constructed under Box Springs Mountain At -grade intersections may be built at intersecting streets between 1-215 and 1-10 m an early phase, with interchanges constructed 111 a later phase In addition, it is possible that the section from Pigeon Pass Road eastward could be built in an initial phase, with the section from Pigeon Pass Road to 1-215 reserved for a later phase, due to the high cost of the tunnel portion May 13, 2002 397 Page 1 r o-CniJtc1k Draft Project Pe$cnptcan a Number of lanes - four lanes in the limited access expressway section, with additional lanes as needed at intersections or interchanges, in the arterial section along California Street, six lanes with turn lanes sufficient to accommodate projected left and right -turning traffic o Cross-section - In expressway sections, rural -type cross-section (no curbs), consistent with local and/or Caltrans standards, with narrowing in tunnel and mountainous sections to reduce costs and to integrate with the environment, in the arterial section along California Street, comply with cross-section standards of the City of Loma Linda The maximum nght-of-way width required in the expressway section will be approximately 120 feet plus additional width for cut and fill However, a wider potential right-of-way band may be established for preservation in some areas to allow for flexibility in future alignment decisions that best accommodate facility design features and that avoid and minimize potential impacts The widest -right-of-way band would be in the range of 500 feet At the same time, RCTC, SANBAG, and local governments will work with property owners to minimize the band width to the extent feasible so that the actual alignment can be identified as closely as possible at this stage a Design speed - 65 mph desired with 55 mph allowable in areas of difficult topography O Habitat crossings - provide for habitat connectivity at appropriate locations, where feasible o No through trucks allowed o Access - provide no access to the facility in areas where no development is planned In general, any access will be at intersections with other roadways, with no dared access to adjacent properties in areas along the expressway section Access to businesses will be provided along the California Street section Exhibit 1 illustrates the proposed core facility and ancillary elements as a series of "alignment numbers " There are several alignment variations for the core facility between 1-215 and Barton Road These are shown as variations of Alignment 1 - A, B, etc The other alignment numbers represent possible ancillary connections to this core facility The ancillary connections are proposed as controlled access arterials 0 e private dnvcways will be redirected to a possible frontage road and enter at a traffic signal, to the extent possible) The ancillary connections include the following G Pigeon Pass Road - Widen, pave and realign Pigeon Pass Rd to a four -lane arterial at the north end of Moreno Valley Connect to the new core facility at the southeast side of the Riverside County Landfill If the tunnel section of the core facility is not constructed until a later phase, improvements to Pigeon Pass Road southerly toward SR -60 may need to be considered as part of the interim solution o Reche Canyon Road North - Widen Reche Canyon Rd to a four -lane arterial from the core facility to Barton Rd in Colton, realign across from Hunts Lane and continue north on 1-lunts Lane to 1-10 a Reche Vista Dr. - Widen and realign Reche Vista Dr from Pems Boulevard to Reche Canyon Rd The widening would be to a four -lane arterial o Connection from the core alignment northward to Main Street in Higkgrove and Riverside Avenue// -10 in Rialto - This will be referred to as the Riverside Avenue connection It would generally proceed from the core alignment across or around the closed Riverside County landfill, circumvent the Sprang Mountain Ranch development, connect to Main Street in Highgrovc, proceed westerly across 1-215 to Riverside Avenue, and follow Riverside Avenue north to 1-10 A variation of this alignment would include crossing 1-215 at Main Street as stated above, hut connecting to Pepper Avenue at 1-10 rather than Riverside Avenue It should be noted that Interstate 10 and 1-215 also Zink Riverside and San Bernardino Counties in this study area Both of these facilities will require widening in the future These improvement projects will May 13 2002 Page 2 398 410 • • nuo roiriTY rnartrnnt sae my Droll Project Descfipfrou • • • be considered separately from the Two -County Corridor Study The connections being considered in this EIR are needed as a part of the overall improvement program for these growing areas Transportation Issues A high level of interaction exists between the east San Bernardino Valley and Moreno Valley/eastern Riverside for employment, shopping, health care, and recreation The primary crtics within San Bernardino County with which Moreno Valley and Riverside interact are the Cities of San Bernardino, Colton, Grand Terrace, Loma Linda, Redlands, Highland, and Yucaipa •The level of interaction will sigrnficantly increase in the future There are currently five primary highway route choices within this corndor 1) SR 60 to the City of Riverside, then 1-215 to San Bernardino, 2) SR 60 east to Beaumont then West on 1-10 to destinations between San Bernardino and Yucaipa, 3) Pigeon Pass Road to Mt Vernon Ave (only a lightly -traveled dirt road in the northern section), 4) Reche Canyon Road, and 5) Moreno Redlands Boulevard to San Iimoteo Canyon Road The following is a summary listing of transportation issues that exist in the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County corridor The "Existing and Future Conditions" section of the EIR discusses these problems aiid issues in greater detail • Population in this corridor is expected to nearly double over the next 20 years Employment is expected to increase by slightly more than double • Travel options to the west and north are very limited for Moreno Valley residents The most heavily used route is Reche Canyon Road, a two-lane roadway that currently carries approximately 7600 vehicles per day near the county line and 14,000 per day just south of Barton Road The demand on Reche Canyon Road south of Barton Road is expected to increase to approximately 35,000 vehicles per day in year 2020, or 150 percent • Traffic is projected to increase on 1-215 at the County line from 150,000 today to approximately 250,000 in year 2020 This 2020 volume is more traffic than is currently carried on SR -91 at the Riverside/Orange County lane Thus, even with improvements on 1-215, congestion is expected to continue and increase This will make the provision of an additional route between Riverside and San Bernardino Counties even more important than it is today • March Air Reserve Base (ARB) is planned as a major employment area and goods movement hub with a buildout potential for an estimated 38,000 employees This will increase the importance to the Riverside County economy of maintaining mobility for this north -south movement Lorna Linda Hospital and ancillary facilities are expected to undergo a major expansion, adding some 5000 employees in the arca surrounding the hospital San Bernardino International Airport is undergoing an expansion as well, with significant increases in employment expected • Transit service between Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County is indirect and very limited A trip from Moreno Valley to San Bernardino requires a transfer in Riverside to the Inland Empire Connection Project Objectives Specific objectives of the project are to • Improve safely • Reduce commute times between Moreno Valley and San Bernardino County • Relieve existing and future congestion on north -south arterials May /3 2002 Page 3 399 TWQ-001MATY (-rum DAR cri}Dv Draft Project Description • Improve access to employment centers in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties (March ARI3, SBIA, Loma Linda medical complex, etc ) • improve transit opportunities between the counties • Support the vision and land use plans in each county • Protect the environment and community character May 13, 2002 Pal; e 4 • • • 400 1.4 SAW OW Arterial impr oveme nts - .moiul P roposed Rte USCOE Sod mentat on NW - di P ULiriNAPY ORA?? FU N D1UGY$A10M PUPIP0010 t?Att? RI OR Ptet VALLEY Td DA M IIIRAMANT►igY t4-CtytiMTY COARfDW1 0Y171Att. RI 1P ii i3LU 41.1414/14,Iire 6M REAM. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL March 12, 2003 Pr ent )71 PK- a 0 0 71 -171 Absent ,Trj„ County of Riverside, District County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District III County of Riverside, District IV County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8