HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 27, 2003 Plans and ProgramsRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TIOT " - - " "" """ "'
PLANS AND PROGRAMS CON
MEETING AGENDA Records
TIME: 12:00 P.M.
DATE: January 27, 2003
LOCATION: Board Chambers
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside
*** COMMITTEE MEMBERS ***
Daryl Busch/Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris, Chairman
Dick Kelly/Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert, Vice Chairman
Gregory Schook/John Chlebnik, City of Calimesa
Jeff Miller/Jeff Bennett, City of Corona
Greg Ruppert/Matt Weyuker, City of Desert Hot Springs
Robin ReeserLowe/Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet
Percy L. Byrd/Robert Bernheimer, City of Indian Wells
Frank West/Bonnie Flickinger, City of Moreno Valley
Jack van Haaster/Warnie Enochs, City of Murrieta
Frank Hall/Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco
Will Kleindienst/Chris Mills, City of Palm Springs
Bob Buster, County of Riverside, District 1
Roy Wilson, County of Riverside, District IV
Marion Ashley, County of Riverside, District V
0Z2979
*** STAFF ***
Eric Haley, Executive Director
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning & Policy Development
*** AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY ***
State Transportation Improvement Program
Regional Transportation Improvement Program
New Corridors
Intermodal Programs (Transit, Rail, Rideshare)
Air Quality and Clean Fuels
Regional Agencies, Regional Planning
Intelligent Transportation System Planning and Programs
Congestion Management Program
The Committee welcomes comments. If you wish to provide comments to the
Committee, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Board.
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE
www.rctc.org
AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
12:00 p.m.
Monday, January 27, 2003
Board Chambers
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
• 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
•
5. RESOLUTION NO. 03-019 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO
ESTABLISH POLICY RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING OPERATIONS AT
COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS pg. 8
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Recommend approval of Resolution No. 03-019 delegating authority to the
Executive Director to establish policy rules and regulations regarding
operations at commuter rail stations; and
2) Forward to the commission for final action.
6. FY 03 AMENDMENT TO COMMUTER RAIL'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN -
FLEXING OF STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO FTA'S SECTION
5307 FUNDS AND REVISION TO THE PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR THE NORTH
MAIN CORONA PARKING STRUCTURE pg. 10
Plans and Programs Committee Agenda
January 27, 2003
Page 2
•
•
•
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Authorize the flexing of State Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP
funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307 program;
2) Include the North Main Corona Parking Structure in the Program of Projects
for the Riverside — San Bernardino Urbanized area as well as the Regional
Transportation Improvement Plan;
3) Amend the FY 03 Short Range Transit Plan for the Commuter Rail Program to
reflect the change in funding sources; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7. CETAP UPDATE
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive and file the CETAP Update; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
8. FY 02 TRANSIT OPERATORS' REPORT
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive and file the FY 02 Transit Operators' Report; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
9. SECTION 5311 AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Pg. 12
Pg. 14
Pg. 19
1) Receive and file information on Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance
Funds; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
Plans and Programs Committee Agenda
January 27, 2003
Page 3
S10. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
Pg. 22
1) Receive and file Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
11. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
12. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT
Overview
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on
attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission
activities.
• 13. ADJOURNMENT
The next Plans and Programs Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at 12:00
p.m., Monday, February 24, 2003, Board Chambers, County Administrative Center,
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside.
•
MINUTES
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE
Monday, October 28, 2002
MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Plans and Programs Committee was called to order by
Chairman Daryl Busch at 12:00 p.m., in the Conference Room at University
Village, Room 207, 1201 University Avenue, Riverside, California, 92507.
2. ROLL CALL
Members/Alternates Present
Daryl Busch
Bob Buster
Percy Byrd
Frank Hall
Dick Kelly
William Kleindienst
Robin Lowe
Tom Mullen
Janice Rudman
Greg Ruppert
Alfred Trembly
Jack van Haaster
Frank West
Roy Wilson
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no requests from the public to speak.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — August 26, 2002
M/S/C (Lowe/Kelly) to approve the August 26, 2002 minutes as
submitted.
Abstain: Byrd, Kleindienst
Plans and Programs Committee Minutes
October 28, 2002
Page 2
5. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH COACHELLA VALLEY
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Commissioner Jack van Haaster asked if staff envisioned having a similar
memorandum with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG).
Eric Haley, Executive Director, explained that this memorandum governs the
distribution of Measure "A" revenues and WRCOG does not have a direct
role in that Expenditure Plan.
M/S/C (Lowe/Kleindienst) to:
1. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the
Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of
Governments (CVAG) setting forth responsibilities for the
administration of the 2002 Measure "A" Sales Tax Program in
the Coachella Valley; and,
2. Forward to the Commission for final action.
6. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STIP REPROGRAMMING REQUEST
Shirley Medina, . Program Manager, reviewed the County of Riverside's
request to reprogram STIP Funds from the Newport Road Project to the SR
79 Project.
Commissioner Robin Lowe asked how the County proposed to replace the
funds for the Newport Road Project. George Johnson, Director of County of
Riverside Transportation Department, indicated that the County is requesting
that the STIP Funds be removed from the project because with these funds,
Caltrans and the FHWA would require a full EIR/EIS be completed due to the
Indian Cultural Site on the Newport Road Alignment, adding an additional
5 years to the project. He added that by seeking County and local funds,
the project could begin construction in 2004.
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development,
added that the STIP Funds are being moved from one County project to
another County project and this request has been reviewed and
recommended by both the Technical Advisory Committee and staff.
Commissioner Percy Byrd recommended that overcrossings be considered
instead of signaled intersections.
Commissioner Bob Buster asked if an estimate for land area needed to
construct overcrossings or undercrossings could be obtained. He suggested
the Commission recommend to the County that they set aside the necessary
Plans and Programs Committee Minutes
October 28, 2002
Page 3
land. George Johnson responded that the plan is for the project to be an
expressway and the County and the Commission need to look at the CETAP
North -South Corridor to build the level of facility being recommended for
overcrossings and undercrossings.
In response to Commissioner Lowe's inquiry about planned improvements to
Simpson Road, George Johnson indicated that Simpson Road will be
reconstructed and the project is currently out for bid.
M/S/C (Mullen/R. Wilson) to:
1. Approve the County of Riverside's request to reprogram STIP
Funds on Newport Road to SR 79; and,
2. Forward to the Commission for final action.
Nay: Byrd, Lowe, Rudman, Ruppert
7. STATUS OF WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS / SAN
DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INTERSTATE 15 PARTNERSHIP
STUDY
Tim McLarney, representing Godbe Research and Analysis, presented the
results of the 1-15 Interregional Partnership Study. He reviewed the
following:
• Research objectives
• Methodology
• 1-15 Commute Facts
• 1-15 Commuter Employment Facts
• Commuter Satisfaction with Riverside County
• Commuter Interest in Changing Jobs or Moving
Commissioner Buster asked if any transportation improvement
recommendations could be made from this study. Tim McLarney responded
that while he is not a planner or policy maker, there are some near -term
improvements such as a bus route from the Temecula-Murrieta area to North
San Diego County because of the concentration of people commuting
between these areas.
Commissioner Tom Mullen stated his belief that a better education system as
well as a first-rate transportation system will drive higher paying jobs into the
County. He recommended the Executive Director to place an item on a
future agenda calling for a study of high-speed rail from March Air Reserve
Base to the San Diego Ports, moving towards a strategic plan for future
implementation.
Plans and Programs Committee Minutes
October 28, 2002
Page 4
Eric Haley noted that the California High -Speed Rail Commission has the 1-15
Corridor on their map and he would be meeting with representatives from the
California High -Speed Rail Commission and will bring this item for discussion.
M/S/C (Mullen/Lowe) to:
1. Receive and file the Western Riverside Council of Governments /
San Diego Association of Governments Interstate 15
Partnership Study; and,
2. Forward to the Commission for final action.
8. DESIGNATED RECIPIENT OF FEDERAL URBANIZED AREA FORMULA FUNDS
FOR THE INDIO - CATHEDRAL CITY - PALM SPRINGS URBANIZED AREA
AND THE TEMECULA - MURRIETA URBANIZED AREA FOR THE FEDERAL
TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5307 PROGRAM
M/S/C (Ruppert/Mullen) to:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 03-012 recommending to the Governor of
the State of California that the Southern California Association
of Governments (SCAG) be identified as the Designated
Recipient for Federal Transit Administration Funds apportioned
to the newly combined urbanized area of Indio - Cathedral City
- Palm Springs as well as the newly established Temecula -
Murrieta urbanized area;
2. Direct staff to seek written concurrence from the transit
agencies serving these areas; and,
3. Forward to the Commission for final action.
9. FISCAL YEAR 2003 AMENDMENT TO COMMUTER RAIL'S SHORT RANGE
TRANSIT PLAN - ALLOCATION OF STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
M/S/C (R. Wilson/Ruppert) to:
1. Reduce the original $1.8 Million allocation in State Transit
Assistance (STA) Funds for the La Sierra Station Parking
Expansion to $1 Million;
2. Allocate $302,100 in STA Funds for the completion of the
Federal Transit Administration's Alternative Analysis for the San
Jacinto Branch Line;
3. Allocate $100,000 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for rail
station operating and legal expenses;
•
•
•
Plans and Programs Committee Minutes
October 28, 2002
Page 5
4. Amend the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect these
changes; and,
5. Forward to the Commission for final action.
10. WORKSHOP SPONSORSHIP: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR
COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION
M/S/C (Byrd/Hall) to:
1. Approve the sponsorship of a workshop at the Spring 2003
Conference of the California Association for Coordinated
Transportation;
2. Allocate up to $ 1,500 in Measure "A" Specialized
Transportation Funds to cover the cost of sponsoring the
workshop; and,
3. Forward to the Commission for final action.
11. AGREEMENT NO. 03-25-032 WITH THE WESTERN AREA SECURITY
SERVICES AGREEMENT TO INCLUDE GUARD SERVICES FOR THE NORTH
MAIN CORONA STATION
M/S/C (R. Wilson/Trembly) to:
1. Approve Agreement No. 03-25-032 (Amendment No. 1 to RO
No. 2161) with Western Area Security Services in an amount
not to exceed $ 115,000 to include the addition of the North
Main Corona Metrolink Station among the properties they
currently provide security services, pursuant to Legal Counsel
review; and,
2. Forward to the Commission for final action.
12. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE
Commissioner Dick Kelly asked for RTA's level of activity for shuttles
meeting the Metrolink trains. Karen Leland, Staff Analyst, responded that
RTA shuttles are meeting three peak -hour morning trains and four peak -hour
evening trains.
M/S/C (Kelly/Mullen) to:
1. Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an
information item; and,
2. Forward to the Commission for final action.
Plans and Programs Committee Minutes
October 28, 2002
Page 6
13. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF
A. Commissioner Roy Wilson wished staff a successful move into the
new County Administrative Center Annex.
B. Commissioner Frank Hall commended WRCOG, San Diego Council of
Governments, and Orange County Council of Governments on their
communication efforts.
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Plans and Programs
Committee, the meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m. The next meeting is
scheduled for 12:00 p.m., Monday, November 25, 2002, in the Conference
Room, University Village, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside,
California, 92507.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer Harmon
Deputy Clerk of the Board
•
•
•
• AGENDA ITEM 5
•
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2003
TO:
Plans and Programs Committee
FROM:
Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy
Development
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 03-019 authorizing the Executive Director to
Establish Policy Rules and Regulations Regarding Operations at
Commuter Rail Stations
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Recommend approval of Resolution No. 03-019 delegating authority to
the Executive Director to establish policy rules and regulations
regarding operations at commuter rail stations; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In June 1993, the Commission began the operation of two commuter rail stations,
Riverside -Downtown and The Ped/ey Station. In October 1995, two additional
commuter rail stations, La Sierra and West Corona, were opened. The Commission
recently opened its fifth commuter rail station, North Main Corona, in November
2002.
Passenger boardings and alightings at our stations is at an all-time high averaging
2,783 during the month of November 2002. Parking at the new North Main
Corona Station is nearing capacity and parking lot expansion projects at the
Riverside -Downtown and La Sierra Stations are to be completed within the next
few months. The continued success of Metrolink, growth in ridership, and increase
in boardings contribute to the attractiveness of our stations for free speech
activities and food and beverage vendors.
The establishment of formal rules and regulations regarding operations at our rail
stations, in consultation with legal counsel, protects the Commission -owned
properties by reducing exposure to liability. The nature of the rules and regulations
are operational, not programmatic, therefore, the staff recommendation is to
delegate authority to the Executive Director by adoption of Resolution 03-019.
Attachment: Resolution No. 03-019
000001
RESOLUTION NO. 03-019
RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH POLICY RULES AND
REGULATIONS REGARDING OPERATIONS AT COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission owns and
operates commuter rail stations in Riverside County; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission wishes to
delegate to the Executive Director the authority to establish policy rules and
regulations regarding operations at commuter rail stations.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby
resolves as follows:
Section 1. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to establish policy rules
and regulations consistent with current law regarding operations at
commuter rail stations.
Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
adoption.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Chair
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board
Riverside County Transportation Commission
•
•
•
000t]u2
• AGENDA ITEM 6
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2003
TO:
Plans and Programs Committee
FROM:
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy
Development
SUBJECT:
FY 03 Amendment to Commuter Rail's Short Range Transit Plan -
Flexing of State Transportation Improvement funds to FTA's
Section 5307 Funds and Revision to the Program of Projects for
the North Main Corona Parking Structure
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Plans and Programs Committee to:
1) Authorize the flexing of State Transportation Improvement Program
(ITIP funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307
program;
2) Include the North Main Corona Parking Structure in the Program of
Projects for the Riverside - San Bernardino Urbanized area as well as
the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan;
3) Amend the FY 03 Short Range Transit Plan for the Commuter Rail
Program to reflect the change in funding sources; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Commuter Rail program is requesting a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP)
amendment to reflect a change in funding sources from State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP - ITIP funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's
(FTA) Section 5307 program. Originally, the North Main Corona Parking Structure
was approved for $11,000,000 in STIP - ITIP funding. Caltrans recently requested
that the first phase of this funding ($500,000) be transferred to the FTA's Section
5307 program. If approved, the $500,000 will be comprised of $443,000 in FTA
funds with the remaining $57,000 funded by the State. The funding will be used
for the design, engineering and construction of a 1,000 space parking structure at
the Commuter Rail's North Main Corona Station.
ID Attachment: Excel Spreadsheet - FY03 Program of Projects
606003
PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
FTA SECTION 5307
FY 2002-03
URBANIZED AREA:
BUS APPORTIONMENT:
RAIL APPORTIONMENT:
CARRYOVER FUNDS -BUS:
CARRYOVER FUNDS -RAIL:
TRANSFER FUNDS - BUS (CMAQ)
TRANSFER FUNDS -RAIL:
TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -BUS:
TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -RAIL:
RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO
$6,178,364
$4,767,890
$3,189,643
$8,315,721
385,000
$443,000
$9,753,007
$13,526,611
RECIPIENTS:
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
CITY OF CORONA
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
RCTC - COMMUTER RAIL
SUBAREA APPORTIONMENT
$4,385,000
$902,000
$581,000
$4,682,000
PROGRAM OF PROJECTS:
1) CORONA - PURCHASE FOUR REPLACEMENT
DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES - RIV 32145
2) CORONA - PURCHASE THREE EXPANSION VEHICLES
FIXED ROUTE - RIV 010511
3) CORONA - PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - RIV 020604
4) RIVERSIDE - PURCHASE 8 INTERMEDIATE SIZED
SERVICE BUSES FOR DAR (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 32166
5) RIVERSIDE - PURCHASE TWO DIAL -A -RIDE
VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 020605
6) RTA - PURCHASE OFFICE EQUIPMENT - RIV 32221
7) RTA - PURCHASE OF MAINTENANCE SPARE
COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT - RIV 32236
8) RTA - PURCHASE OF BUS STOP AMENITIES AND
SUPPLIES - RIV 32237
9) RTA - PURCHASE 10 DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES
(EXPANSION) - RIV 32666
10) RTA - DEBT FINANCING FOR 57 TRANSIT COACHES
PURCHASED IN 2000 - RIV 000605
11) RTA - IMPROVEMENTS AT RIVERSIDE AND HEMET
FACILITIES - RIV 990722
12) RTA - PURCHASE OF 10 SUPPORT VEHICLES
(EXPANSION) - RIV 990724
13) RTA - PURCHASE OF 10 30 -FOOT BUSES (EXPANSION)
- RIV 020601
14) RTA - PURCHASE 5 SUPPORT VEHICLES
(REPLACEMENT) - RIV 020602
15) RTA - CNG FUELING STATION AT RIV. FACILITY
CMAQ - FLEX FUNDS - RIV 000101
16) RCTC - REHABILITATION AND RENOVATION
OF TRACK IMPROVEMENTS (RCTC's PORTION
- SCRRA PROJECT) - RIV 010514
17) RCTC'S ROLLING STOCK RESERVE - RIV 010214
18) RCTC - North Main Corona Parking Structure
(STIP - ITIP) FLEX FUNDS
TOTAL PROGRAMMED
BALANCE AVAILABLE: BUS:
RAIL:
TL: 6/24/02
0 0 0 0 ( /4, Revised: 1/27/03
TOTAL
AMOUNT
$600,000
$451,000
$30,000
$560,000
$140,000
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$400,000
$2,140,000
$500,000
$220,000
$3,100,000
$100,000
$450,000
$995,000
FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED
SHARE
$498,000
$374,000
$30,000
$465,000
$116,000
$80,000
$80,000
$160,000
$320,000
$1,712,000
$400,000
$176,000
$992,000
$80,000
$385,000
$995,000
$3,244,000 $3,244,000
$500,000
$443,000
$13,830,000 $10,550,000
$3,885,007
$8,844,611
TYPE RECIPIENT
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
C SCAG
•
• AGENDA ITEM 7
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2003
TO:
Plans and Programs Committee
FROM:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy
Development
THROUGH:
Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
CETAP Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive and file the CETAP Update; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Internal Corridors
The last few months have been very busy with work on the CETAP internal corridors.
Per direction received from the Commission, five additional public hearings were held
to receive comments from the public on the alternatives being considered for the
Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore Corridor and the Winchester to Temecula Corridor.
Hearings were held as follows:
Hearing Location Date Number That Signed In
Temecula December 18, 2002 97
Lake Elsinore December 19, 2002 54
Perris January 9, 2003 42
Winchester January 16, 2003 156
Corona January 21, 2003 51
A court reporter was present at all of the meetings to record public testimony. A
summary of all the comments received at these five public hearings, the two public
hearings held in August 2002, and all written comments is currently being prepared.
Due to the tight timeframe between our last hearing and this agenda mailout, the
summary will be presented at the Committee meeting.
Numerous meetings have been held between the Federal Highway Administration and
the Federal Resource Agencies to discuss their comments provided on the CETAP
environmental documents and to determine the magnitude of additional work that may
be required to address their comments. Two key meetings will be held the week
before our Committee meeting to assist in decisions regarding information requirements
for the environmental documents. A verbal report of the meetings will be provided at
the Committee meeting.
000005
As mentioned previously, the County of Riverside Board of Supervisor's has directed
that the Riverside County Integrated Project be completed by July 1, 2003. Therefore,
we are on a tight timeline for decision making for the CETAP internal corridors. On
February 4, 2003 the CETAP Advisory Committee will meet for their regularly
scheduled meeting. Staff will be requesting the Advisory Committee to provide a
recommendation on a preferred alternative for each corridor at this meeting and will
bring it forward to the full Commission on February 12, 2003.
Inter -County Corridors
A meeting of the Moreno Valley -San Bernardino County Corridor Policy Committee is
scheduled for January 30, 2003. A presentation will be made which will review work
completed to date, budget, and a review of next steps for this corridor.
A bi-county committee has been formed per direction in Assembly Bill 1010 to review
issues dealing with OCTA's SR91 Toll Road and a new inter -county corridor between
Riverside and Orange Counties. This committee will have five representatives from
OCTA and five from RCTC. Our representatives will include Commissioners Buster,
Miller, Roberts, Schiffner, and Tavaglione, with Commissioner Moore as an alternate.
While we expect the first few meetings of the AB1010 Committee to focus more on
Toll Road issues, we are optimistic about future work on the CETAP corridor work as
staff from OCTA has expressed interest in moving forward in a joint work effort.
•
OUu7U6
AGENDA ITEM 8
•
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2003
TO:
Plans and Programs Committee
FROM:
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning
Development
and
Policy
SUBJECT:
FY 02 Transit Operators' Report
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive and file the FY 02 Transit Operators' Report; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Under Public Utility Code Section 99244, the Commission must annually identify,
analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements, which could lower
the cost of transit operations. Part of that process includes the review of ridership
data from the public operators. The attached report represents county -wide public
transportation ridership, operating and financial information for FY 02 for the eight
public operators.
Attachment 1 provides data and performance statistics for the public operators for
both fixed route and ADA/paratransit services. A total of 13,240,711 passenger
trips were provided during FY 02 (12,621,111 for fixed route services and
619,600 for ADA/paratransit services). Operating cost per revenue hour for fixed
route services (excludes the cost of commuter rail) ranged from a low of $19.39
(Palo Verde Valley Transit) to a high of $88.20 (SunLine Transit Agency).
Operating cost per revenue hour for ADA/Paratransit services ranged from a low of
$36.70 (City of Corona) to a high of $53.27 (SunLine Transit Agency).
Attachment 2 provides a ridership comparison between FY 01 and FY 02. Overall,
ridership on fixed route increased for the majority of transit operators. However,
during FY 02 SunLine experienced a ridership decrease of 24,322 (3,742,500
passengers during FY 01 compared to 3,718,178 passengers during FY 02).
Ridership on ADA/Paratransit increased for most of the operators, however,
ridership showed a decrease for the following operators:
000007
1) City of Corona (74,582 trips provided during FY 01 compared to
65,887 during FY 02 — a decrease of 8,695); and
2) Riverside Transit Agency (225,583 trips provided during FY 01
compared to 224,280 during FY 02 — a decrease of 1,303).
Attachments: Transit Operator Ridership Report - Annual Actuals
Ridership Comparisons
r
0,0000 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSPORTATION COMMISSION
TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT
A ttachment 1
FY 02 FIXED ROUTE - ANNUAL ACTUALS
Data Elements - System Wide Total
City of Banning
Transit
City of Beaumont
Transit
City of Corona
Transit
Commuter Ra il -
Riverside Line
Co mmuter Rail -
IEOC Line
Commuter Rail -
91 Line
Palo Verde Valley
Transit
Riverside Transit
Agency
Su nLine Transit
Agency
Total - All
Providers
Unlinke d Passenger Trips
235,539
61,857
43,356
1,161,485
732,110
41,940
5,234
6,621,412
3,718,178
12,621,111
Passenger Miles
-
-
--
42,689,140
24,575,155
1,363,815
--
37,313,067
24,995,824
130,937,001
Total Actual Vehicles Revenue Hours
10,720
6,311
12,185
--
0
--
2,428
339,798
146,863
518,305
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
153,695
85,847
89,467
185,130
180,794
26,066
-
5,431,394
2,261,201
8,413,594
Total Actual Vehicle Miles
158,616
-
185,695
-
-
--
30,064
5,994,903
2,345,381
8,714,659
Collisions
0
-
2
-
--
-
--
60
1
63
Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures
37
--
19
--
-
-
--
773
185
1,014
Total Valid Passenger Complaints
18
--
2
-
--
--
--
730
392
1,142
Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled
93,952
-
-
-
-
--
--
336,044
160,859
590,855
Total Actual On-Tirne Revenue Vehicle Trips
73,371
-
-
-
--
--
-
310,050
153,643
537,064
Total Operating Expenses
$655,933
$282,804
$439,184
Not Available
Not Available
$47,071
$23,696,203
$12,952,933
$38,074,128
Total Passenger Fare Revenues
$98,116
$22,578
$29,425
$5,569,016
$3,471,778
$150,117
$13,360
$4,978,895
$2,410,913
$16,744,198
Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies)
$557,817
6260.226
$409,759
Not Available
No t Available
$33,711
$18,717,308
$10,542 ,020
$30,520,841
Performance Statistics -System Wide',"
Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$61.19
$44.81
$36.04
$19.39
$69 .74
$88 .20
Farebox Recovery Ratio
14.96%
7.98%
6.70%
28 .38 %
21 .01%
18.61%
Subsidy per Passenger
$2. 37
$4. 21
$9. 45
$6.44
62.83
$2 .84
Subsidy per Passenger Mlle
-
--
-
$0.50
$0 .42
Subsidy per Revenue Hour
$52.04
$41.23
$33.63
$13 .89
$$3.05
$$1.66
Subsidy per Revenue Mile
$3.63
$3.03
$4.58
$3 .45
$4 .66
Passen gers per Revenue Hour
21.97
9. 80
3.56
2 .16
19.49
25.32
:.
Passengers per Revenue Miles
1.53
0.72
0.48
--
1.22
1.64
Revenue Miles Between Collisions
113,207
--
94,525
--
90,523
2,261,201
% Trips On -Time
78%
--
-
--
92.3%
95.51 %
Complaints per 1,000 Passengers
0. 00008
0.00000
0.00005
0.00000
0.00011
0.00011
Total Miles Betwe en Roa dcalls
4,287
--
4,709
..
--
• •
•312:16 PM
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT
•
FY02 ADA/PARATRA NSIT - A NNUAL ACTUALS
•
Data Elements - System Wide To tal
City of Banning
Transit
City of Beaumont
Transit
City of Corona
Transit
City of Riverside
Specialized
Transit
Palo Verde Valle y
Transit
Riverside Transit
Agency
SunLine Transit
Agency
Total - All
Providers
Unlinked Passenger Trips
9,435
29,847
65,887
156,306
22,103
224,280
111,742
619,600
Passenger M iles
303,664
630,989
-
2,249,528
2,154,466
5,338,647
220,879
Total A ctual Vehicles Revenue Hours
1,986
6,946
15,072
37,954
5,937
107,695
45,289
Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles
32,041
79,114
232,812
630,471
-
1,828,068
799,456
3,601,962
Total Actual Vehicle Miles
34,360
--
260,999
612,633
44,436
1,828,068
895,508
3,676,004
Collisions
0
--
2
4
--
21
1
28
200
Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures
1
-
17
32
-
100
50
Total Valid Passenger Complaints
0
--
11
4
--
140
173
328
Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled
8,820
--
70,718
159,387
--
225,361
91,021
555,307
540,771
Total Actual On -Time Revenue Vehicle Trips
8,631
--
67,433
159,264
-
219,366
86,077
Total Operating Expenses
$78,657
$303,190
$553,203
$1,519,326
$243,600
$4,570,625
$2,412,394
$9,680,995
Total Passenger Fare Revenues
$5,752
$29,940
$79,202
$115,969
$24,576
$163,797
$199,878
$619,114
Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies)
$72,905
$273,250
$474,001
$1,403,357
$219,024
$4,406,828
$2,212,516
$9,061,881
Performance Statistics - System Wide
�
�'
_. .J.
Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour
$39.61
$43.65
$36.70
$40.03 $41 .03
$42.44
$53.27
Farebox Recovery Ratio
7. 31% 9. 87%
14.32%
7.63% 10.09%
3 .58%
8.29 %
Subsidy per Passenger
$7.73 $9. 16
$7.19
$8.98 $9 .91
$19.65
$19.80p
Subsidy per Passenger Mile
$1.56
$2.22 --
$1.96
$1 .03
Subsidy per Revenue Hour
$36. 71 $39.34
$31.45
$36.98 $36.89
$40.92
$48.85
Subsidy per Revenue Mile
$2. 28 $3.45
$2.04
$2.23 --
$2.41
$2.77
Passengers per Revenue Hour
4.75 4. 30
4. 37
4.12 3.72
2.08
2.47.
Passengers per Revenue Miles
0.29 0.38
0.28
0.25 --
0.12
0.14
Revenue M iles Between Collisions
- -
110,444
157,618 --
87,051
799,456
% Trips On -Time
98.0% -
95.4%
99.92 % -
--
94 .57%
+'
Complaints per 1,000 Passengers
0.00000 0.00000
0.00017
0.00003 0.00000
0 .00062
0.00155
Total M iles Between Roadcalls
29,971 --
13,695
19,702 --
--
� ���
1/21/200312:15 PM
5,000,000 -
N
1-
ao - 4,000,000 -
c
N
10
a
d 3,000,000 -
c
2,000,000 -
1,000,000 -
0
•
Attachment 2
FIXED ROUTE (Public Bus): Comparison of FY 01 and FY 02
Banning
Beaumont
Transit Operat ors
•
RTA
Sunline
I7 FY01
® FY02
•
•
•
PARATRANSIT: Comparison - FY 01 and FY 02
250,000
N 200,000 -
sZ
150,000 -
a)
N
ca
100,000 -
a)
Y
C
50,000 -
0
Banning Beaumont Corona Riverside Palo Verde RTA
Transit Operators
SunLine
FY 01
FY02
2
Unlinked Passenger Trips
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000 -
600,000 -
400,000
200,000
0
•
COMMUTER RAIL: Comparison of FY01 and FY 02
Riverside
IEOC
Rail Lines
FY01
■ FY02
• •
•
•
• AGENDA ITEM 9
•
•
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2003
TO:
Plans and Programs Committee
FROM:
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning
Development
and
Policy
SUBJECT:
Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance Funds
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive and file information on Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance
Funds; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION::
Section 5311 Funding
In December, 2002, the Commission was notified by the State of California, Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) that the FY 03 apportionment for Section 5311 funds was
projected to be lower than originally anticipated. Section 5311 funds are federal dollars
available for services in rural areas. The original projection, made in June, 2002, was
$ 538,126; the revised projection is $278,119 (representing a $260,007 decrease in
funds). The following table provides a summary breakdown of Section 5311 funds, the
percentage split provided to the Riverside Transit Agency and SunLine Transit Agency,
together with the funding impact for both agencies:
Caltran's Original Projection - Approved 6/12/02 by Commission Action
County - 100%
RTA - 61.7%
SunLine 38.3%
Federal Funds
Available - FY 03
$538, 126
$332,024
$206,102
Carry Over
$296,635
$183,024
$113,611
Total:
$834,761
$ 515,048
$319,713
Caltran's Revised
Projection
County - 100%
RTA - 61.7%
SunLine 38.3%
Federal Funds
Available - FY 03
$278,119
$171,599
$106,520
Carry Over
$296,635
$183,024
$113,611
Total:
$ 574,754
$ 354,623
$ 220,131
Overall Net Decrease
$160,425
000.015
Both RTA and SunLine have been notified of the decrease in funding. At this time
neither agency has indicated that replacement funding (such as Local
Transportation Funds) are required to continue their anticipated level of operating.
State Transit Assistance Funds
In January, 2002, the Commission was notified by the Controller of the State of
California that State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) for FY 03 was projected to be
$2,906,565 ($2,663,987 discretionary pot and $242,578 for specific operators).
In November, 2002, the Commission was notified that the funds projected had
changed and the new amount would be $2,666,036 ($2,297,867 discretionary pot
and $368,169 for specific operators). Attachment 1 provides detail on the revised
projected STA funds for FY 03 for both Section 99313 funds (discretionary funds)
and Section 99314 funds (operator specific) Attachment 2 provides FY 02 carry
over STA balances together with FY 03 projected funding based on the three
apportionment areas. If projected revenues are received, and all funds allocated are
claimed, western Riverside county bus operators will have a deficit of $73,190 at
year end. It should be noted that revenue from interest may cover the potential
deficit as the total interest received during FY 02 was $427,208 (western
Riverside's portion was $265,860).
Given the State's budget crises together with the potential STA deficit in western
Riverside County, staff is recommending that the flow of STA funds be closely
monitored. Should funds spiral downward; staff will provide an up date to the
Commission and seek direction on whether to decrease funding allocations.
Attachment: STA FY 03 Summary - Revised
000016
•Riverside County Transportation Commission Attachment 1
State Transit Funds - FY 03
99313 Funds
99314 Funds
Ref.
Total
Original Notification
(January, 2002)
$2,663,987
$242,578
1
$2,906,565
Revised Notification
(November, 2002)
$2,297,867
$368,169
2
$2,666,036
Difference:
$366,120
Decrease
$125,591
Increase
$240,529
Agency
Reference 1
Reference 2
Banning
$3,341
$2,550
Beaumont
$1,424
$1,109
Corona
$3,958
$3,501
Riverside
$3,469
$3,095
Riverside Transit
$147,592
$139,940
RCTC - Commuter Rail
--
$110,554
SunLine Transit
$81,414
$106,779
Palo Verde Valley
$1,380
$641
TOTAL:
$242,578
$368,169
Impact on Individual Agencies
$791 decrease
$315 decrease
$457 decrease
$374 decrease
$7,652 decrease
$110,554 increase
$25,365 increase
$739 decrease
99313 Funds Available
Western Riverside
Coachella Valley
Ref.
Palo Verde Valley
$2,297,867
$1,772,575
$486,458
3
$38,834 Revised Projection - November, 2002
v r i rYa
$1,418,060 Bus operators (80%) $1,772,575 x .80%
;_ ,.
$354,515 Rail operator (20%) $1,772,575 x .20%
SUMMARY -
REVISED STA
FUND
PROJECTION
Western Riverside
Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
PUC 99313 Funds
$1,772,575
$486,458
$38,834
PUC 99314 Funds
$260,749
$106,779
$641
Total:
$2,033,324
$593,237
$39,475
Bus - 99313 funds
$1,418,060
Bus - 99314 funds
$150,195
Total:
$1,568,255
Rail - 99313 funds
$354,515
Rail - 99314 funds
$110,554
Total:
$465,069
Reference 3
Population Information Based on Department of Finance Estimates (Retrieved 12/31/01)
Area
Westem
Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
Population Population Percentage
1,240,834 77.14%
340,576 21.17%
27,160 1.69%
1/16/2003
STA FY 03 Summary
Revised Projections
000ii17,v
Attachment 2
Riverside County Transportation Commission
State Transit Funds - FY 03
STA FY 02 Ending Balances (by Apportionment Area)
Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley
Bus Rail Total
$1,722,685 $1,831,071 $721,966 $284,807 $4,560,529
STA FY 03 Apportionment (Revised November, 2002)
Western Riverside
Bus
$1,568,255
'Coachella Valley 'Palo Verde Valley
Rail
$465,0691 $593,2371 $39,475
Total
$2,666,036
TOTAL STA FUNDS AVAILABLE
(Ending balance FY 02 and projected allocations FY 03)
Western
Bus
Riverside
Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley
Rail
$721,966
$593,237
$284,807
$39,475
$1,722,685
$1,568,255
$1,831,071
$465,069
$3,290,940
$2,296,140
$1,315,203
$324,282
LESS ALLOCATIONS
Western
Bus
Riverside
Rail
$1,000,000
$339,858
$302,100
$253,000
Coachella Valley
$651,000
Palo Verde Valley
$98,200
RTA - FY 98, 99 & 00
RTA - FY 02
Banning - FY 02
Corona - FY 02
Beaumont - FY 03
Riv. Spec. Svs. - FY 03
RTA - FY 03
Commuter Rail - FY 02 (1)
Commuter Rail - FY 03
Commuter Rail - FY 03 (2)
Commuter Rail - FY 03 (3)
SunLine - FY 03
Palo Verde - FY 03
$540,068
$1,050,000
$12,494
$568
$9,000
$95,000
$1,657,000
Total Allocations:
$3,364,130
$1,894,958
$651,000
$98,200
Projected Balance of
Funds
1 -$73,1901
$401,1821
$664,203
$226,082
(1) Commuter Rail reduced its STA claim from $1.8 million to $1 million for the San Jacinto Branch
Line. Approved by Commission Action 11/13/02.
(2) Commuter Rail received an additional allocation of $302,100 on 11/13/02 for the completion of
FTA's Alternative Analysis for the San Jacinto Branch Line.
(3) Commuter Rail received an additional allocation of $253,000 on 12/11/02 for real property
services/right of way info for San Jacinto Branch Line.
00001
1/16/2003
STA FY 03 Summary
Revised Projections
•
•
• AGENDA ITEM 10
•
•
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2003
TO:
Plans and Program Committee
FROM:
Karen Leland, Staff Analyst
Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning
Development
and
Policy
SUBJECT:
Commuter Rail Program Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Receive and file Commuter Rail Program Update as an information
item; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Riverside Line
Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of
December averaged 4,013, a 9% decrease from the month of November. The Line
has averaged an overall decrease of 5% from a year ago December 2001.
December on -time performance averaged 97% inbound (no change from
November) and 97% outbound (-1 % from November).
Inland Empire -Orange County Line
Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County
(IEOC) Line for the month of December averaged 2,730, a 13% decrease from the
month of November. The line is unchanged from a year ago December 2001.
December on -time performance averaged 90% inbound (-2% from November) and
93% outbound (-2% from November).
91 Line
Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of
December averaged 1,617, an 8% increase from the month of November.
000019
December on -time performance averaged 93% inbound (+7% from November) and
96% outbound (+ 2% from November).
Rideshare 2 Rails (R2R) Program
RZ;]Reshare
AILS Rideshare Incentives: As of December 31St, enrollment was at 179
��`"' (Riverside -Downtown 57 Pedley 15, La Sierra 42, and West Corona 65),
freeing up 90 spaces for new riders.
Parking lot usage at the North Main Corona station will be assessed to determine
the feasibility of extending Rideshare2Rails Incentives to this location. If station
parking is impacted, approximately a half dozen spaces will be striped for use by
passengers who carpool to the station.
RTA Express Bus Shuttle: Ridership for the month of December averaged 17 one-
way trips per day, a 2% decrease from the month of November that is most likely
due to the December holidays.
Station Activities
North Main Corona Station - "Welcome to Our Neighborhood" Demonstration
Project: As new neighbors to the North Main Corona area, RCTC staff has
designed a station outreach project to businesses immediately surrounding the
station. Six local businesses have agreed to offer discounts to Metrolink
passengers who board at the station. In exchange, these businesses have agreed
to provide train schedules at their locations and are designated as Station
Community Partners. A coupon booklet containing these discounts will be
distributed at the station over the next few weeks. Staff will report back on the
results of the project.
In addition, during the month of February, the Fender Museum of Music and the
Arts is partnering with RCTC to provide free admissions for Metrolink ticket holders
to the Museum, a Jazz concert, and a chance to enter into a drawing to win a free
fender guitar.
RCTC Metro/ink Station Daily Activities: Daily activities are recorded by station
security guards. Attached is summary data covering second quarter 02/03
(October — December 2002).
Attachments:
Metrolink Performance Summaries (December 2002)
RCTC Metrolink Stations Daily Activity Report (October -December 2002)
•
•
0000
METROLFNK PERFORMANCE SUMMARIES
December 2002
11eI METROLINK
• •
METROLINK
A VERA GE WEEKDA Y PASSENGER TRIPS
36,000
34,000 -4-
32,000
30,000
28,000
26,000
24,000
22,000
20,000
32,978
32,443
N.
30,307
Dec -01 Jan -02
33,097
32,257
34,294
33,57
Feb -02
Mar -02
Apr -02
May -02
Jun -02
33,759
Jul -02
® H oliday Adj t Unadj Avg
33,485
Aug -02
34,109
Sep -02
34,912
w\N‘
'\\\\\N
Oct -02
35,170
Nov -02
32 032
Dec -02
• 110
•
METROLINK ON -TIME. PERFORMANCE
Weekday Trains. (Latest 13 M onths)
Dec 01 Jan 02 Feb 02 Mar 02 Ap 02 May 02 Jun. 02 Jul 02 Aug 02 Sep 02 Oct 02 Nov 02 Dec 02
® % Arriving. Within 5 -Minutes. Of Scheduled . Time
% of Train Delays By Resp onsibility
December 2002
Passenger
2%
Other
17%
Includes Weekend Service
TRK-Contractor
SCR-Contra�u�t U6o/ R
7% 2%
OP Agree
2% Law-Enf Improv. (SCRR A)
2% 10 %
Vandalism
2%
Mechanical
18%
TRK-Contractor
1%
SIG -Contractor
9%
Passenger
2%
Includes Weekend Service
% of Train Delays By Responsibility
12 Month. Period . Ending. December 2002
10%
Vandalism Mechanical
0
4% 14%
OP Agree Law-Enf
2% 1°/0
BNSF
32%
•
PERFO RM ANCE CHARTS -BACK-UP
/[(�«)II METROLINK
• •
CD
CD
METROLINK AVER AGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS
THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED
Dec 01
Jan 02
Feb 02
Mar 02
Apr 02
Jun 02
Jul 02
Aug 02
Sep 02
Oct 02
Nov 02
Dec 02
3,144
3,566
3,612
3,650
3441
3,565
3,781
3,664
3,506
3,770
3,759
3,402
4,898
4,813
5,031
5,135
4913
5,597
5,694
5,840
5,694
5,495
5,704
6,011
5,437
9,391
10,086
10,235
10124
9,817
9,688
10,141
10,328
10,411
9,516
452
480
464
518
507
525
533
510
524
531
541
532
497
4,223
4,596
4,615
4524
4,288
4,202
4,159
4,444
4,031
5,369
5,865
5,882
5,931
5848
5,794
5,651
5,519
5,556
5,432
5,465
5,372
4,802
2,733
2,930
3,010
3,033
2791
2,916
2,982
3,092
3,053
3,140
3,139
2,730
97
107
109
109
847
1,165
1,292
1,378
1,492
1,617
30,307
32,443
32,978
33,097
32257
33,571
34,294
33,759
33,485
34,109
34,912
35,160
32,032
Change
Dec 02 vs Nov 02
-9%
-10%
-9%
-7%
-9%
-11%
-13%
8%
-9%
% Change
Dec 02 vs Dec 01
8%
11%
1%
10%
-5%
-11%
0%
1567%
6%
-8%
7%
2%
0%
-3%
4%
2%
-2%
-1%
2%
2%
1%
-9%
•
An u, TnhI
00
cz„
ADR MoNew.xls
Avg Daily Riders
3500
3000
2500-
2000-
1500-
1000-
500-
0�
Dec 01
Jan
Note: Sept Includes L. A. County Fair Riders
Feb
San Bernardino. Line . Saturday Service
Average Daily Passenger Trips
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul Aug Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec -02
Avg Daily Riders
3500
3000-
2500-
2000
1500
1000
500-
Dec 01
Jan
Note: Sunday Service Began 06/25/00`
San. Bernardino . Line Sunday Service
Average Daily Passenger Trips
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02
•
410
n919WK nndN ow
Antelope Valley Line Saturday Service
Average. Daily Passenger Trips
Avg Daily Riders
3500
3000-
2500-
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
Dec 01 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02
No te: Sept In cludes L.A . County Fair Riders1
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500 -
Riv erside Line Saturday Ser vice
Average Daily. Passenger Trips
Dec 01 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Note: Service Began June 24, 2000 - Service Discontinued January 19, 2002
•
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02
•
•
1n
C)
METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SU MMARY
Percentage of Trains Arri ving. Within 5 Minut es of Scheduled. Time
LATEST 13 MONTHS
m, ...3c. .g.a .. .. . ..,,.
t .
.. ,c;,. ., ,.
-,.,
nvy . A• .z . .a a• .. ,.
` "''&.
"k �'1�i
., ,w .., , ..�..
x. '� .:
... nlln tta3., *
.�,,. ..
.w . ad
. r, .. w a
97%
.;.�
... �1%�a .
97%
,_IIMm
100%
§
88% 92%
t,J,.. v
h�. . .. _ ,. ..
97 %
"b'y�
��'_�3
88%
�.. tv5�'.�AM
y � �
.,r ,..z �.( c ._..o. %_
94% 98%
7._a.
k.
.. N =.d4 w
95%
..
95 %
Zr ya; �I , .$
3b rf�%W �
.��'?; , e � ...
96% 96%
. .� .�., p
,.. .
96%
Nov 01
98%
100%
97%
97%
98%
Dec01
98%
99%
98%
99%
98%
97%
98 %
99%
91%
90%
91 %
93%
93%
93%
95 %
92 %
96 %
96%
96%
Jan 02
98%
99%
99%
100%
97%
96%
100%
99%
91%
86%
97%
94%
92%
95 %
73%
98%
96%
96%
96 %
Feb 02
98%
100%
97%
97%
97 %
97 %
99%
98 %
95%
81 %
91 %
97%
90%
98 %
85 %
95 %
95%
96%
96%
Mar02
100%
99%
97%
94%
97%
97 %
99 %
100%
92%
94%
98%
96%
95%
95 %
86%
98 %
97%
96%
97%
Apr02
99%
100%
97%
93%
98%
95%
100%
99 %
94%
98%
91%
96%
97%
94 %
95 %
95 %
96%
96%
96%
May 02
99%
97%
98%
98%
97%
96%
100 %
98 %
96%
92%
89 %
87%
87%
92%
87 %
83%
95 %
94 %
94%
Jun 02
99%
98%
98%
99%
98%
96%
99%
97%
95%
97 %
93 %
96 %
94%
90%
95%
90%
97%
96 %
96%
Jul02
99%
99%
98%
95%
98%
99%
100%
99 %
99%
96%
91%
95 %
93 %
90%
92%
92%
97 %
96 %
96 %
Aug 02
100%
97%
99%
96%
96%
91%
100%
99%
97%
95%
89 %
91%
92 %
90%
91 %
90 %
96%
94%
95 %
Sep 02
98%
99%
95%
94%
94%
91%
98%
98%
96 %
98%
85%
92 %
94%
84%
89 %
92%
94 %
93 %
94%
Oct 02
99%
98%
99%
99%
96%
95%
98%
95%
95%
96%
92 %
96%
93 %
93%
92%
96%
96%
96%
96 %
Nov 02
98%
97%
98%
97%
94%
84%
100%
99%
97%
98 %
88%
89%
92 %
95%
86%
94 %
94%
93%
94 %
Dec 02
98%
97%
98%
97%
97%
91%
99%
100%
97%
97%
96%
97%
90%
93%
93 %
96%
96%
95%
96%
Peak Perio d Trains Arriv ing Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time
i Eau :,
Dec 02
Peak Period Trains
96% 96% 100% 96% 98% 89%
...,. .i�K
98% 100% 97% 97% 95% 98 % 87% 92% 93%
95%
96 % 95% 96%
No adjustments hav e been made for relievable delays.
Terminated trains are considered OT if they were on -time at point of termination.
A nnulled trains are not included in the on -time calculation.
•
11
•
11T 41\Ir./.lw. .,
CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS.
DECEMBER 2002
PRIMARY. CAUSE OF TRAIN. DELAYS. GREATER THAN. 5. MINUTES
CAUSE:
VEN
AVL
SNB
BUR
RIV
OC
INL/OC
R/F/L
TOTAL
% of TOT
Signals/Detectors
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
2
8
7%
Slow Orders/MOW
0
0
13
0
0
1
0
0
14
12%
Track/Switch
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
3%
Dispatching
2
0
2
0
1
8
13
7
33
28%
Mechanical
3
3
8
0
4
3
2
0
23
19 %
Freight Train
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
Amtrak Train
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
6
5%
Metrolink Meet/Turn
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1%
Vandalism
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2%
Passenger(s)
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
4
3%
SCRRA Hold. Policy
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
Other
1
8
10
0
0
0
5
0
24
20%
TOTAL
12
13
37
1
8
15
22
10
118
100%
•
•
Saturday
SNB
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Saturday
AVL
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
3
0
Sunday
SNB
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
•12CAUS
FREQUENCY OF TRAIN DELAYS BY DURATION
DECEMBER 2002
MINUTES LA TE:
VEN
AVL
SNB
BUR
RIV
OC
IE/OC
RIV/FUL
TOTAL
% of TOT
NO DELAY
369
444
338
225
223
344
198
164
2305
80.2%
1 MIN - 5 MIN
38
47
254
3
21
40
32
15
450
15.7%
6MIN -10 M IN
6
5
17
0
2
5
4
4
43
1.5 %
11 MIN - 20 MIN
5
3
15
1
1
7
10
4
46
1.6%
21 MIN - 30 MIN
0
1
3
0
2
1
3
1
11
0 .4%
GREATER THAN 30 MIN
1
4
2
0
3
2
5
1
18
0.6%
ANNULLED
2
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
6
0 .2%
TOTAL TRAINS OPTD
419
504
629
229
252
399
252
189
2873
100 %
TRAINS DELAYED >0 min
50
60
291
4
29
55
54
25
568
19.8%
TRAINS DELAYED > 5 min
12
13
37
1
8
15
22
10
118
4.1%
•
•
•REQ
•
•
Daily Activity Report
Metrolink Stations
Generated from 10/01/02 to 12/31/02
Riverside Pedley La Sierra W. Corona N Corona Total
1 - Standard Procedures
1A - RCTC Staff on Site 2
1B - Customer Assistance 94
1C - Ambassador on Site 105
Total 201
1 1 0 2 6
92 91 93 40 410
4 28 23 18 178
97
120 116 60 594
2 - Criminal Incidents
2D - Criminal Behavior 1 0 0 0 0 1
2E - Grafitti 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 2 0 0 0 0 2
4 - Maintenance/Repairs
4A - Lights 6 0 0 2 3 11
4B - TVM / Validator Machine 24 16 8 12 12 72
4C - Elevator 2 0 6 0 0 8
4D - Station Cleaning 34 31 18 31 1 115
4E - Landscaping 19 20 6 20 0 65
4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 0 1 0 0 0 1
4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 8 25 11 22 3 69
4G - Pepsi Vending 2 0 0 1 0 3
4H - Other 12 1 12 8 1 34
Total 107 94 61 96 20 378
5 - Miscellaneous
5A - Miscellaneous Activity
27
Total 27
6 - Parked Overnight
• 6A - Parked Ovemight 27
Total 27
7 - Overflow
* 7A - Veh. In Overflow
11
64 40 6 148
11
4
64 40 6 148
8 9 5 53
4
0 0
8 9 5 53
64 0 0 64
Total
0 0
8 - Parking Citations
8A - Parking Citations 0
Total 0
9 -Empty Spaces
* 9A - Empty Spaces 61
Total 61
91 - R2R Vehicles
* 91A - R2R Vehicles 6
Total 6
92 - Vehicles Parked
* 92A - Vehicles Parked
0
64 0 0 64
O 0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0 0
O 270 6 337
0
1
0 270 6 337
6 5 0 18
1
O 0
6 5 0 18
O 0 244 244
Total
O 0
0 0 244 244
* Value is averaged over the data entry days Thursday, January 16, 2003
nonov
Riverside - Do wntown
Activity D etail Report
Genera ted from 10/1/02 to 12/31/02
Activity Subtype # Vehicles
D ate Time Activity Log # Descriptio n Activity Type
10/13/2002 64226 Graffiti noted on blue recycle bin front of statio 2 - Criminal Incidents
12/5/2002 10:00am 65232 Indiv. in custody for public intoxication 2 - Criminal Incidents
2E - Grafitti
2D - Criminal Behavior
0
0
Thursda y, Jan uary 16, 2003 Page 1 of 1