Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 27, 2003 Plans and ProgramsRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TIOT " - - " "" """ "' PLANS AND PROGRAMS CON MEETING AGENDA Records TIME: 12:00 P.M. DATE: January 27, 2003 LOCATION: Board Chambers County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside *** COMMITTEE MEMBERS *** Daryl Busch/Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris, Chairman Dick Kelly/Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert, Vice Chairman Gregory Schook/John Chlebnik, City of Calimesa Jeff Miller/Jeff Bennett, City of Corona Greg Ruppert/Matt Weyuker, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin ReeserLowe/Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet Percy L. Byrd/Robert Bernheimer, City of Indian Wells Frank West/Bonnie Flickinger, City of Moreno Valley Jack van Haaster/Warnie Enochs, City of Murrieta Frank Hall/Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco Will Kleindienst/Chris Mills, City of Palm Springs Bob Buster, County of Riverside, District 1 Roy Wilson, County of Riverside, District IV Marion Ashley, County of Riverside, District V 0Z2979 *** STAFF *** Eric Haley, Executive Director Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning & Policy Development *** AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY *** State Transportation Improvement Program Regional Transportation Improvement Program New Corridors Intermodal Programs (Transit, Rail, Rideshare) Air Quality and Clean Fuels Regional Agencies, Regional Planning Intelligent Transportation System Planning and Programs Congestion Management Program The Committee welcomes comments. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Board. • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 12:00 p.m. Monday, January 27, 2003 Board Chambers County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL • 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • 5. RESOLUTION NO. 03-019 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH POLICY RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING OPERATIONS AT COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS pg. 8 Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Recommend approval of Resolution No. 03-019 delegating authority to the Executive Director to establish policy rules and regulations regarding operations at commuter rail stations; and 2) Forward to the commission for final action. 6. FY 03 AMENDMENT TO COMMUTER RAIL'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN - FLEXING OF STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO FTA'S SECTION 5307 FUNDS AND REVISION TO THE PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA PARKING STRUCTURE pg. 10 Plans and Programs Committee Agenda January 27, 2003 Page 2 • • • Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Authorize the flexing of State Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307 program; 2) Include the North Main Corona Parking Structure in the Program of Projects for the Riverside — San Bernardino Urbanized area as well as the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan; 3) Amend the FY 03 Short Range Transit Plan for the Commuter Rail Program to reflect the change in funding sources; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 7. CETAP UPDATE Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the CETAP Update; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 8. FY 02 TRANSIT OPERATORS' REPORT Overview This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the FY 02 Transit Operators' Report; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. SECTION 5311 AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 12 Pg. 14 Pg. 19 1) Receive and file information on Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance Funds; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Plans and Programs Committee Agenda January 27, 2003 Page 3 S10. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Overview This item is for the Committee to: Pg. 22 1) Receive and file Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 12. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. • 13. ADJOURNMENT The next Plans and Programs Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at 12:00 p.m., Monday, February 24, 2003, Board Chambers, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. • MINUTES • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE Monday, October 28, 2002 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Plans and Programs Committee was called to order by Chairman Daryl Busch at 12:00 p.m., in the Conference Room at University Village, Room 207, 1201 University Avenue, Riverside, California, 92507. 2. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Daryl Busch Bob Buster Percy Byrd Frank Hall Dick Kelly William Kleindienst Robin Lowe Tom Mullen Janice Rudman Greg Ruppert Alfred Trembly Jack van Haaster Frank West Roy Wilson 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests from the public to speak. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — August 26, 2002 M/S/C (Lowe/Kelly) to approve the August 26, 2002 minutes as submitted. Abstain: Byrd, Kleindienst Plans and Programs Committee Minutes October 28, 2002 Page 2 5. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Commissioner Jack van Haaster asked if staff envisioned having a similar memorandum with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Eric Haley, Executive Director, explained that this memorandum governs the distribution of Measure "A" revenues and WRCOG does not have a direct role in that Expenditure Plan. M/S/C (Lowe/Kleindienst) to: 1. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) setting forth responsibilities for the administration of the 2002 Measure "A" Sales Tax Program in the Coachella Valley; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 6. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STIP REPROGRAMMING REQUEST Shirley Medina, . Program Manager, reviewed the County of Riverside's request to reprogram STIP Funds from the Newport Road Project to the SR 79 Project. Commissioner Robin Lowe asked how the County proposed to replace the funds for the Newport Road Project. George Johnson, Director of County of Riverside Transportation Department, indicated that the County is requesting that the STIP Funds be removed from the project because with these funds, Caltrans and the FHWA would require a full EIR/EIS be completed due to the Indian Cultural Site on the Newport Road Alignment, adding an additional 5 years to the project. He added that by seeking County and local funds, the project could begin construction in 2004. Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development, added that the STIP Funds are being moved from one County project to another County project and this request has been reviewed and recommended by both the Technical Advisory Committee and staff. Commissioner Percy Byrd recommended that overcrossings be considered instead of signaled intersections. Commissioner Bob Buster asked if an estimate for land area needed to construct overcrossings or undercrossings could be obtained. He suggested the Commission recommend to the County that they set aside the necessary Plans and Programs Committee Minutes October 28, 2002 Page 3 land. George Johnson responded that the plan is for the project to be an expressway and the County and the Commission need to look at the CETAP North -South Corridor to build the level of facility being recommended for overcrossings and undercrossings. In response to Commissioner Lowe's inquiry about planned improvements to Simpson Road, George Johnson indicated that Simpson Road will be reconstructed and the project is currently out for bid. M/S/C (Mullen/R. Wilson) to: 1. Approve the County of Riverside's request to reprogram STIP Funds on Newport Road to SR 79; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. Nay: Byrd, Lowe, Rudman, Ruppert 7. STATUS OF WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS / SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INTERSTATE 15 PARTNERSHIP STUDY Tim McLarney, representing Godbe Research and Analysis, presented the results of the 1-15 Interregional Partnership Study. He reviewed the following: • Research objectives • Methodology • 1-15 Commute Facts • 1-15 Commuter Employment Facts • Commuter Satisfaction with Riverside County • Commuter Interest in Changing Jobs or Moving Commissioner Buster asked if any transportation improvement recommendations could be made from this study. Tim McLarney responded that while he is not a planner or policy maker, there are some near -term improvements such as a bus route from the Temecula-Murrieta area to North San Diego County because of the concentration of people commuting between these areas. Commissioner Tom Mullen stated his belief that a better education system as well as a first-rate transportation system will drive higher paying jobs into the County. He recommended the Executive Director to place an item on a future agenda calling for a study of high-speed rail from March Air Reserve Base to the San Diego Ports, moving towards a strategic plan for future implementation. Plans and Programs Committee Minutes October 28, 2002 Page 4 Eric Haley noted that the California High -Speed Rail Commission has the 1-15 Corridor on their map and he would be meeting with representatives from the California High -Speed Rail Commission and will bring this item for discussion. M/S/C (Mullen/Lowe) to: 1. Receive and file the Western Riverside Council of Governments / San Diego Association of Governments Interstate 15 Partnership Study; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 8. DESIGNATED RECIPIENT OF FEDERAL URBANIZED AREA FORMULA FUNDS FOR THE INDIO - CATHEDRAL CITY - PALM SPRINGS URBANIZED AREA AND THE TEMECULA - MURRIETA URBANIZED AREA FOR THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5307 PROGRAM M/S/C (Ruppert/Mullen) to: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 03-012 recommending to the Governor of the State of California that the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) be identified as the Designated Recipient for Federal Transit Administration Funds apportioned to the newly combined urbanized area of Indio - Cathedral City - Palm Springs as well as the newly established Temecula - Murrieta urbanized area; 2. Direct staff to seek written concurrence from the transit agencies serving these areas; and, 3. Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. FISCAL YEAR 2003 AMENDMENT TO COMMUTER RAIL'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN - ALLOCATION OF STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS M/S/C (R. Wilson/Ruppert) to: 1. Reduce the original $1.8 Million allocation in State Transit Assistance (STA) Funds for the La Sierra Station Parking Expansion to $1 Million; 2. Allocate $302,100 in STA Funds for the completion of the Federal Transit Administration's Alternative Analysis for the San Jacinto Branch Line; 3. Allocate $100,000 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for rail station operating and legal expenses; • • • Plans and Programs Committee Minutes October 28, 2002 Page 5 4. Amend the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect these changes; and, 5. Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. WORKSHOP SPONSORSHIP: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION M/S/C (Byrd/Hall) to: 1. Approve the sponsorship of a workshop at the Spring 2003 Conference of the California Association for Coordinated Transportation; 2. Allocate up to $ 1,500 in Measure "A" Specialized Transportation Funds to cover the cost of sponsoring the workshop; and, 3. Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. AGREEMENT NO. 03-25-032 WITH THE WESTERN AREA SECURITY SERVICES AGREEMENT TO INCLUDE GUARD SERVICES FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA STATION M/S/C (R. Wilson/Trembly) to: 1. Approve Agreement No. 03-25-032 (Amendment No. 1 to RO No. 2161) with Western Area Security Services in an amount not to exceed $ 115,000 to include the addition of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station among the properties they currently provide security services, pursuant to Legal Counsel review; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Commissioner Dick Kelly asked for RTA's level of activity for shuttles meeting the Metrolink trains. Karen Leland, Staff Analyst, responded that RTA shuttles are meeting three peak -hour morning trains and four peak -hour evening trains. M/S/C (Kelly/Mullen) to: 1. Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. Plans and Programs Committee Minutes October 28, 2002 Page 6 13. COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS/STAFF A. Commissioner Roy Wilson wished staff a successful move into the new County Administrative Center Annex. B. Commissioner Frank Hall commended WRCOG, San Diego Council of Governments, and Orange County Council of Governments on their communication efforts. 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Plans and Programs Committee, the meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m. The next meeting is scheduled for 12:00 p.m., Monday, November 25, 2002, in the Conference Room, University Village, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, California, 92507. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Deputy Clerk of the Board • • • • AGENDA ITEM 5 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2003 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development SUBJECT: Resolution No. 03-019 authorizing the Executive Director to Establish Policy Rules and Regulations Regarding Operations at Commuter Rail Stations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Recommend approval of Resolution No. 03-019 delegating authority to the Executive Director to establish policy rules and regulations regarding operations at commuter rail stations; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In June 1993, the Commission began the operation of two commuter rail stations, Riverside -Downtown and The Ped/ey Station. In October 1995, two additional commuter rail stations, La Sierra and West Corona, were opened. The Commission recently opened its fifth commuter rail station, North Main Corona, in November 2002. Passenger boardings and alightings at our stations is at an all-time high averaging 2,783 during the month of November 2002. Parking at the new North Main Corona Station is nearing capacity and parking lot expansion projects at the Riverside -Downtown and La Sierra Stations are to be completed within the next few months. The continued success of Metrolink, growth in ridership, and increase in boardings contribute to the attractiveness of our stations for free speech activities and food and beverage vendors. The establishment of formal rules and regulations regarding operations at our rail stations, in consultation with legal counsel, protects the Commission -owned properties by reducing exposure to liability. The nature of the rules and regulations are operational, not programmatic, therefore, the staff recommendation is to delegate authority to the Executive Director by adoption of Resolution 03-019. Attachment: Resolution No. 03-019 000001 RESOLUTION NO. 03-019 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH POLICY RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING OPERATIONS AT COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission owns and operates commuter rail stations in Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission wishes to delegate to the Executive Director the authority to establish policy rules and regulations regarding operations at commuter rail stations. NOW, THEREFORE, the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to establish policy rules and regulations consistent with current law regarding operations at commuter rail stations. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003 ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • 000t]u2 • AGENDA ITEM 6 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2003 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development SUBJECT: FY 03 Amendment to Commuter Rail's Short Range Transit Plan - Flexing of State Transportation Improvement funds to FTA's Section 5307 Funds and Revision to the Program of Projects for the North Main Corona Parking Structure STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Plans and Programs Committee to: 1) Authorize the flexing of State Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307 program; 2) Include the North Main Corona Parking Structure in the Program of Projects for the Riverside - San Bernardino Urbanized area as well as the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan; 3) Amend the FY 03 Short Range Transit Plan for the Commuter Rail Program to reflect the change in funding sources; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commuter Rail program is requesting a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) amendment to reflect a change in funding sources from State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP - ITIP funds) to the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 program. Originally, the North Main Corona Parking Structure was approved for $11,000,000 in STIP - ITIP funding. Caltrans recently requested that the first phase of this funding ($500,000) be transferred to the FTA's Section 5307 program. If approved, the $500,000 will be comprised of $443,000 in FTA funds with the remaining $57,000 funded by the State. The funding will be used for the design, engineering and construction of a 1,000 space parking structure at the Commuter Rail's North Main Corona Station. ID Attachment: Excel Spreadsheet - FY03 Program of Projects 606003 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2002-03 URBANIZED AREA: BUS APPORTIONMENT: RAIL APPORTIONMENT: CARRYOVER FUNDS -BUS: CARRYOVER FUNDS -RAIL: TRANSFER FUNDS - BUS (CMAQ) TRANSFER FUNDS -RAIL: TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -BUS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -RAIL: RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO $6,178,364 $4,767,890 $3,189,643 $8,315,721 385,000 $443,000 $9,753,007 $13,526,611 RECIPIENTS: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY CITY OF CORONA CITY OF RIVERSIDE RCTC - COMMUTER RAIL SUBAREA APPORTIONMENT $4,385,000 $902,000 $581,000 $4,682,000 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: 1) CORONA - PURCHASE FOUR REPLACEMENT DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES - RIV 32145 2) CORONA - PURCHASE THREE EXPANSION VEHICLES FIXED ROUTE - RIV 010511 3) CORONA - PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - RIV 020604 4) RIVERSIDE - PURCHASE 8 INTERMEDIATE SIZED SERVICE BUSES FOR DAR (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 32166 5) RIVERSIDE - PURCHASE TWO DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 020605 6) RTA - PURCHASE OFFICE EQUIPMENT - RIV 32221 7) RTA - PURCHASE OF MAINTENANCE SPARE COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT - RIV 32236 8) RTA - PURCHASE OF BUS STOP AMENITIES AND SUPPLIES - RIV 32237 9) RTA - PURCHASE 10 DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 32666 10) RTA - DEBT FINANCING FOR 57 TRANSIT COACHES PURCHASED IN 2000 - RIV 000605 11) RTA - IMPROVEMENTS AT RIVERSIDE AND HEMET FACILITIES - RIV 990722 12) RTA - PURCHASE OF 10 SUPPORT VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 990724 13) RTA - PURCHASE OF 10 30 -FOOT BUSES (EXPANSION) - RIV 020601 14) RTA - PURCHASE 5 SUPPORT VEHICLES (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 020602 15) RTA - CNG FUELING STATION AT RIV. FACILITY CMAQ - FLEX FUNDS - RIV 000101 16) RCTC - REHABILITATION AND RENOVATION OF TRACK IMPROVEMENTS (RCTC's PORTION - SCRRA PROJECT) - RIV 010514 17) RCTC'S ROLLING STOCK RESERVE - RIV 010214 18) RCTC - North Main Corona Parking Structure (STIP - ITIP) FLEX FUNDS TOTAL PROGRAMMED BALANCE AVAILABLE: BUS: RAIL: TL: 6/24/02 0 0 0 0 ( /4, Revised: 1/27/03 TOTAL AMOUNT $600,000 $451,000 $30,000 $560,000 $140,000 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $400,000 $2,140,000 $500,000 $220,000 $3,100,000 $100,000 $450,000 $995,000 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE $498,000 $374,000 $30,000 $465,000 $116,000 $80,000 $80,000 $160,000 $320,000 $1,712,000 $400,000 $176,000 $992,000 $80,000 $385,000 $995,000 $3,244,000 $3,244,000 $500,000 $443,000 $13,830,000 $10,550,000 $3,885,007 $8,844,611 TYPE RECIPIENT C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG • • AGENDA ITEM 7 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2003 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: CETAP Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the CETAP Update; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Internal Corridors The last few months have been very busy with work on the CETAP internal corridors. Per direction received from the Commission, five additional public hearings were held to receive comments from the public on the alternatives being considered for the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore Corridor and the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. Hearings were held as follows: Hearing Location Date Number That Signed In Temecula December 18, 2002 97 Lake Elsinore December 19, 2002 54 Perris January 9, 2003 42 Winchester January 16, 2003 156 Corona January 21, 2003 51 A court reporter was present at all of the meetings to record public testimony. A summary of all the comments received at these five public hearings, the two public hearings held in August 2002, and all written comments is currently being prepared. Due to the tight timeframe between our last hearing and this agenda mailout, the summary will be presented at the Committee meeting. Numerous meetings have been held between the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Resource Agencies to discuss their comments provided on the CETAP environmental documents and to determine the magnitude of additional work that may be required to address their comments. Two key meetings will be held the week before our Committee meeting to assist in decisions regarding information requirements for the environmental documents. A verbal report of the meetings will be provided at the Committee meeting. 000005 As mentioned previously, the County of Riverside Board of Supervisor's has directed that the Riverside County Integrated Project be completed by July 1, 2003. Therefore, we are on a tight timeline for decision making for the CETAP internal corridors. On February 4, 2003 the CETAP Advisory Committee will meet for their regularly scheduled meeting. Staff will be requesting the Advisory Committee to provide a recommendation on a preferred alternative for each corridor at this meeting and will bring it forward to the full Commission on February 12, 2003. Inter -County Corridors A meeting of the Moreno Valley -San Bernardino County Corridor Policy Committee is scheduled for January 30, 2003. A presentation will be made which will review work completed to date, budget, and a review of next steps for this corridor. A bi-county committee has been formed per direction in Assembly Bill 1010 to review issues dealing with OCTA's SR91 Toll Road and a new inter -county corridor between Riverside and Orange Counties. This committee will have five representatives from OCTA and five from RCTC. Our representatives will include Commissioners Buster, Miller, Roberts, Schiffner, and Tavaglione, with Commissioner Moore as an alternate. While we expect the first few meetings of the AB1010 Committee to focus more on Toll Road issues, we are optimistic about future work on the CETAP corridor work as staff from OCTA has expressed interest in moving forward in a joint work effort. • OUu7U6 AGENDA ITEM 8 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2003 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning Development and Policy SUBJECT: FY 02 Transit Operators' Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file the FY 02 Transit Operators' Report; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Under Public Utility Code Section 99244, the Commission must annually identify, analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements, which could lower the cost of transit operations. Part of that process includes the review of ridership data from the public operators. The attached report represents county -wide public transportation ridership, operating and financial information for FY 02 for the eight public operators. Attachment 1 provides data and performance statistics for the public operators for both fixed route and ADA/paratransit services. A total of 13,240,711 passenger trips were provided during FY 02 (12,621,111 for fixed route services and 619,600 for ADA/paratransit services). Operating cost per revenue hour for fixed route services (excludes the cost of commuter rail) ranged from a low of $19.39 (Palo Verde Valley Transit) to a high of $88.20 (SunLine Transit Agency). Operating cost per revenue hour for ADA/Paratransit services ranged from a low of $36.70 (City of Corona) to a high of $53.27 (SunLine Transit Agency). Attachment 2 provides a ridership comparison between FY 01 and FY 02. Overall, ridership on fixed route increased for the majority of transit operators. However, during FY 02 SunLine experienced a ridership decrease of 24,322 (3,742,500 passengers during FY 01 compared to 3,718,178 passengers during FY 02). Ridership on ADA/Paratransit increased for most of the operators, however, ridership showed a decrease for the following operators: 000007 1) City of Corona (74,582 trips provided during FY 01 compared to 65,887 during FY 02 — a decrease of 8,695); and 2) Riverside Transit Agency (225,583 trips provided during FY 01 compared to 224,280 during FY 02 — a decrease of 1,303). Attachments: Transit Operator Ridership Report - Annual Actuals Ridership Comparisons r 0,0000 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT A ttachment 1 FY 02 FIXED ROUTE - ANNUAL ACTUALS Data Elements - System Wide Total City of Banning Transit City of Beaumont Transit City of Corona Transit Commuter Ra il - Riverside Line Co mmuter Rail - IEOC Line Commuter Rail - 91 Line Palo Verde Valley Transit Riverside Transit Agency Su nLine Transit Agency Total - All Providers Unlinke d Passenger Trips 235,539 61,857 43,356 1,161,485 732,110 41,940 5,234 6,621,412 3,718,178 12,621,111 Passenger Miles - - -- 42,689,140 24,575,155 1,363,815 -- 37,313,067 24,995,824 130,937,001 Total Actual Vehicles Revenue Hours 10,720 6,311 12,185 -- 0 -- 2,428 339,798 146,863 518,305 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 153,695 85,847 89,467 185,130 180,794 26,066 - 5,431,394 2,261,201 8,413,594 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 158,616 - 185,695 - - -- 30,064 5,994,903 2,345,381 8,714,659 Collisions 0 - 2 - -- - -- 60 1 63 Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures 37 -- 19 -- - - -- 773 185 1,014 Total Valid Passenger Complaints 18 -- 2 - -- -- -- 730 392 1,142 Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled 93,952 - - - - -- -- 336,044 160,859 590,855 Total Actual On-Tirne Revenue Vehicle Trips 73,371 - - - -- -- - 310,050 153,643 537,064 Total Operating Expenses $655,933 $282,804 $439,184 Not Available Not Available $47,071 $23,696,203 $12,952,933 $38,074,128 Total Passenger Fare Revenues $98,116 $22,578 $29,425 $5,569,016 $3,471,778 $150,117 $13,360 $4,978,895 $2,410,913 $16,744,198 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $557,817 6260.226 $409,759 Not Available No t Available $33,711 $18,717,308 $10,542 ,020 $30,520,841 Performance Statistics -System Wide'," Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $61.19 $44.81 $36.04 $19.39 $69 .74 $88 .20 Farebox Recovery Ratio 14.96% 7.98% 6.70% 28 .38 % 21 .01% 18.61% Subsidy per Passenger $2. 37 $4. 21 $9. 45 $6.44 62.83 $2 .84 Subsidy per Passenger Mlle - -- - $0.50 $0 .42 Subsidy per Revenue Hour $52.04 $41.23 $33.63 $13 .89 $$3.05 $$1.66 Subsidy per Revenue Mile $3.63 $3.03 $4.58 $3 .45 $4 .66 Passen gers per Revenue Hour 21.97 9. 80 3.56 2 .16 19.49 25.32 :. Passengers per Revenue Miles 1.53 0.72 0.48 -- 1.22 1.64 Revenue Miles Between Collisions 113,207 -- 94,525 -- 90,523 2,261,201 % Trips On -Time 78% -- - -- 92.3% 95.51 % Complaints per 1,000 Passengers 0. 00008 0.00000 0.00005 0.00000 0.00011 0.00011 Total Miles Betwe en Roa dcalls 4,287 -- 4,709 .. -- • • •312:16 PM • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSIT OPERATOR RIDERSHIP REPORT • FY02 ADA/PARATRA NSIT - A NNUAL ACTUALS • Data Elements - System Wide To tal City of Banning Transit City of Beaumont Transit City of Corona Transit City of Riverside Specialized Transit Palo Verde Valle y Transit Riverside Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency Total - All Providers Unlinked Passenger Trips 9,435 29,847 65,887 156,306 22,103 224,280 111,742 619,600 Passenger M iles 303,664 630,989 - 2,249,528 2,154,466 5,338,647 220,879 Total A ctual Vehicles Revenue Hours 1,986 6,946 15,072 37,954 5,937 107,695 45,289 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 32,041 79,114 232,812 630,471 - 1,828,068 799,456 3,601,962 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 34,360 -- 260,999 612,633 44,436 1,828,068 895,508 3,676,004 Collisions 0 -- 2 4 -- 21 1 28 200 Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures 1 - 17 32 - 100 50 Total Valid Passenger Complaints 0 -- 11 4 -- 140 173 328 Total Revenue Vehicle Trips Scheduled 8,820 -- 70,718 159,387 -- 225,361 91,021 555,307 540,771 Total Actual On -Time Revenue Vehicle Trips 8,631 -- 67,433 159,264 - 219,366 86,077 Total Operating Expenses $78,657 $303,190 $553,203 $1,519,326 $243,600 $4,570,625 $2,412,394 $9,680,995 Total Passenger Fare Revenues $5,752 $29,940 $79,202 $115,969 $24,576 $163,797 $199,878 $619,114 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $72,905 $273,250 $474,001 $1,403,357 $219,024 $4,406,828 $2,212,516 $9,061,881 Performance Statistics - System Wide � �' _. .J. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $39.61 $43.65 $36.70 $40.03 $41 .03 $42.44 $53.27 Farebox Recovery Ratio 7. 31% 9. 87% 14.32% 7.63% 10.09% 3 .58% 8.29 % Subsidy per Passenger $7.73 $9. 16 $7.19 $8.98 $9 .91 $19.65 $19.80p Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.56 $2.22 -- $1.96 $1 .03 Subsidy per Revenue Hour $36. 71 $39.34 $31.45 $36.98 $36.89 $40.92 $48.85 Subsidy per Revenue Mile $2. 28 $3.45 $2.04 $2.23 -- $2.41 $2.77 Passengers per Revenue Hour 4.75 4. 30 4. 37 4.12 3.72 2.08 2.47. Passengers per Revenue Miles 0.29 0.38 0.28 0.25 -- 0.12 0.14 Revenue M iles Between Collisions - - 110,444 157,618 -- 87,051 799,456 % Trips On -Time 98.0% - 95.4% 99.92 % - -- 94 .57% +' Complaints per 1,000 Passengers 0.00000 0.00000 0.00017 0.00003 0.00000 0 .00062 0.00155 Total M iles Between Roadcalls 29,971 -- 13,695 19,702 -- -- � ��� 1/21/200312:15 PM 5,000,000 - N 1- ao - 4,000,000 - c N 10 a d 3,000,000 - c 2,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 0 • Attachment 2 FIXED ROUTE (Public Bus): Comparison of FY 01 and FY 02 Banning Beaumont Transit Operat ors • RTA Sunline I7 FY01 ® FY02 • • • PARATRANSIT: Comparison - FY 01 and FY 02 250,000 N 200,000 - sZ 150,000 - a) N ca 100,000 - a) Y C 50,000 - 0 Banning Beaumont Corona Riverside Palo Verde RTA Transit Operators SunLine FY 01 FY02 2 Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 - 600,000 - 400,000 200,000 0 • COMMUTER RAIL: Comparison of FY01 and FY 02 Riverside IEOC Rail Lines FY01 ■ FY02 • • • • • AGENDA ITEM 9 • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2003 TO: Plans and Programs Committee FROM: Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning Development and Policy SUBJECT: Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance Funds STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file information on Section 5311 and State Transit Assistance Funds; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION:: Section 5311 Funding In December, 2002, the Commission was notified by the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) that the FY 03 apportionment for Section 5311 funds was projected to be lower than originally anticipated. Section 5311 funds are federal dollars available for services in rural areas. The original projection, made in June, 2002, was $ 538,126; the revised projection is $278,119 (representing a $260,007 decrease in funds). The following table provides a summary breakdown of Section 5311 funds, the percentage split provided to the Riverside Transit Agency and SunLine Transit Agency, together with the funding impact for both agencies: Caltran's Original Projection - Approved 6/12/02 by Commission Action County - 100% RTA - 61.7% SunLine 38.3% Federal Funds Available - FY 03 $538, 126 $332,024 $206,102 Carry Over $296,635 $183,024 $113,611 Total: $834,761 $ 515,048 $319,713 Caltran's Revised Projection County - 100% RTA - 61.7% SunLine 38.3% Federal Funds Available - FY 03 $278,119 $171,599 $106,520 Carry Over $296,635 $183,024 $113,611 Total: $ 574,754 $ 354,623 $ 220,131 Overall Net Decrease $160,425 000.015 Both RTA and SunLine have been notified of the decrease in funding. At this time neither agency has indicated that replacement funding (such as Local Transportation Funds) are required to continue their anticipated level of operating. State Transit Assistance Funds In January, 2002, the Commission was notified by the Controller of the State of California that State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) for FY 03 was projected to be $2,906,565 ($2,663,987 discretionary pot and $242,578 for specific operators). In November, 2002, the Commission was notified that the funds projected had changed and the new amount would be $2,666,036 ($2,297,867 discretionary pot and $368,169 for specific operators). Attachment 1 provides detail on the revised projected STA funds for FY 03 for both Section 99313 funds (discretionary funds) and Section 99314 funds (operator specific) Attachment 2 provides FY 02 carry over STA balances together with FY 03 projected funding based on the three apportionment areas. If projected revenues are received, and all funds allocated are claimed, western Riverside county bus operators will have a deficit of $73,190 at year end. It should be noted that revenue from interest may cover the potential deficit as the total interest received during FY 02 was $427,208 (western Riverside's portion was $265,860). Given the State's budget crises together with the potential STA deficit in western Riverside County, staff is recommending that the flow of STA funds be closely monitored. Should funds spiral downward; staff will provide an up date to the Commission and seek direction on whether to decrease funding allocations. Attachment: STA FY 03 Summary - Revised 000016 •Riverside County Transportation Commission Attachment 1 State Transit Funds - FY 03 99313 Funds 99314 Funds Ref. Total Original Notification (January, 2002) $2,663,987 $242,578 1 $2,906,565 Revised Notification (November, 2002) $2,297,867 $368,169 2 $2,666,036 Difference: $366,120 Decrease $125,591 Increase $240,529 Agency Reference 1 Reference 2 Banning $3,341 $2,550 Beaumont $1,424 $1,109 Corona $3,958 $3,501 Riverside $3,469 $3,095 Riverside Transit $147,592 $139,940 RCTC - Commuter Rail -- $110,554 SunLine Transit $81,414 $106,779 Palo Verde Valley $1,380 $641 TOTAL: $242,578 $368,169 Impact on Individual Agencies $791 decrease $315 decrease $457 decrease $374 decrease $7,652 decrease $110,554 increase $25,365 increase $739 decrease 99313 Funds Available Western Riverside Coachella Valley Ref. Palo Verde Valley $2,297,867 $1,772,575 $486,458 3 $38,834 Revised Projection - November, 2002 v r i rYa $1,418,060 Bus operators (80%) $1,772,575 x .80% ;_ ,. $354,515 Rail operator (20%) $1,772,575 x .20% SUMMARY - REVISED STA FUND PROJECTION Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley PUC 99313 Funds $1,772,575 $486,458 $38,834 PUC 99314 Funds $260,749 $106,779 $641 Total: $2,033,324 $593,237 $39,475 Bus - 99313 funds $1,418,060 Bus - 99314 funds $150,195 Total: $1,568,255 Rail - 99313 funds $354,515 Rail - 99314 funds $110,554 Total: $465,069 Reference 3 Population Information Based on Department of Finance Estimates (Retrieved 12/31/01) Area Westem Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Population Population Percentage 1,240,834 77.14% 340,576 21.17% 27,160 1.69% 1/16/2003 STA FY 03 Summary Revised Projections 000ii17,v Attachment 2 Riverside County Transportation Commission State Transit Funds - FY 03 STA FY 02 Ending Balances (by Apportionment Area) Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Bus Rail Total $1,722,685 $1,831,071 $721,966 $284,807 $4,560,529 STA FY 03 Apportionment (Revised November, 2002) Western Riverside Bus $1,568,255 'Coachella Valley 'Palo Verde Valley Rail $465,0691 $593,2371 $39,475 Total $2,666,036 TOTAL STA FUNDS AVAILABLE (Ending balance FY 02 and projected allocations FY 03) Western Bus Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Rail $721,966 $593,237 $284,807 $39,475 $1,722,685 $1,568,255 $1,831,071 $465,069 $3,290,940 $2,296,140 $1,315,203 $324,282 LESS ALLOCATIONS Western Bus Riverside Rail $1,000,000 $339,858 $302,100 $253,000 Coachella Valley $651,000 Palo Verde Valley $98,200 RTA - FY 98, 99 & 00 RTA - FY 02 Banning - FY 02 Corona - FY 02 Beaumont - FY 03 Riv. Spec. Svs. - FY 03 RTA - FY 03 Commuter Rail - FY 02 (1) Commuter Rail - FY 03 Commuter Rail - FY 03 (2) Commuter Rail - FY 03 (3) SunLine - FY 03 Palo Verde - FY 03 $540,068 $1,050,000 $12,494 $568 $9,000 $95,000 $1,657,000 Total Allocations: $3,364,130 $1,894,958 $651,000 $98,200 Projected Balance of Funds 1 -$73,1901 $401,1821 $664,203 $226,082 (1) Commuter Rail reduced its STA claim from $1.8 million to $1 million for the San Jacinto Branch Line. Approved by Commission Action 11/13/02. (2) Commuter Rail received an additional allocation of $302,100 on 11/13/02 for the completion of FTA's Alternative Analysis for the San Jacinto Branch Line. (3) Commuter Rail received an additional allocation of $253,000 on 12/11/02 for real property services/right of way info for San Jacinto Branch Line. 00001 1/16/2003 STA FY 03 Summary Revised Projections • • • AGENDA ITEM 10 • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2003 TO: Plans and Program Committee FROM: Karen Leland, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager THROUGH: Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning Development and Policy SUBJECT: Commuter Rail Program Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Receive and file Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Riverside Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of December averaged 4,013, a 9% decrease from the month of November. The Line has averaged an overall decrease of 5% from a year ago December 2001. December on -time performance averaged 97% inbound (no change from November) and 97% outbound (-1 % from November). Inland Empire -Orange County Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line for the month of December averaged 2,730, a 13% decrease from the month of November. The line is unchanged from a year ago December 2001. December on -time performance averaged 90% inbound (-2% from November) and 93% outbound (-2% from November). 91 Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of December averaged 1,617, an 8% increase from the month of November. 000019 December on -time performance averaged 93% inbound (+7% from November) and 96% outbound (+ 2% from November). Rideshare 2 Rails (R2R) Program RZ;]Reshare AILS Rideshare Incentives: As of December 31St, enrollment was at 179 ��`"' (Riverside -Downtown 57 Pedley 15, La Sierra 42, and West Corona 65), freeing up 90 spaces for new riders. Parking lot usage at the North Main Corona station will be assessed to determine the feasibility of extending Rideshare2Rails Incentives to this location. If station parking is impacted, approximately a half dozen spaces will be striped for use by passengers who carpool to the station. RTA Express Bus Shuttle: Ridership for the month of December averaged 17 one- way trips per day, a 2% decrease from the month of November that is most likely due to the December holidays. Station Activities North Main Corona Station - "Welcome to Our Neighborhood" Demonstration Project: As new neighbors to the North Main Corona area, RCTC staff has designed a station outreach project to businesses immediately surrounding the station. Six local businesses have agreed to offer discounts to Metrolink passengers who board at the station. In exchange, these businesses have agreed to provide train schedules at their locations and are designated as Station Community Partners. A coupon booklet containing these discounts will be distributed at the station over the next few weeks. Staff will report back on the results of the project. In addition, during the month of February, the Fender Museum of Music and the Arts is partnering with RCTC to provide free admissions for Metrolink ticket holders to the Museum, a Jazz concert, and a chance to enter into a drawing to win a free fender guitar. RCTC Metro/ink Station Daily Activities: Daily activities are recorded by station security guards. Attached is summary data covering second quarter 02/03 (October — December 2002). Attachments: Metrolink Performance Summaries (December 2002) RCTC Metrolink Stations Daily Activity Report (October -December 2002) • • 0000 METROLFNK PERFORMANCE SUMMARIES December 2002 11eI METROLINK • • METROLINK A VERA GE WEEKDA Y PASSENGER TRIPS 36,000 34,000 -4- 32,000 30,000 28,000 26,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 32,978 32,443 N. 30,307 Dec -01 Jan -02 33,097 32,257 34,294 33,57 Feb -02 Mar -02 Apr -02 May -02 Jun -02 33,759 Jul -02 ® H oliday Adj t Unadj Avg 33,485 Aug -02 34,109 Sep -02 34,912 w\N‘ '\\\\\N Oct -02 35,170 Nov -02 32 032 Dec -02 • 110 • METROLINK ON -TIME. PERFORMANCE Weekday Trains. (Latest 13 M onths) Dec 01 Jan 02 Feb 02 Mar 02 Ap 02 May 02 Jun. 02 Jul 02 Aug 02 Sep 02 Oct 02 Nov 02 Dec 02 ® % Arriving. Within 5 -Minutes. Of Scheduled . Time % of Train Delays By Resp onsibility December 2002 Passenger 2% Other 17% Includes Weekend Service TRK-Contractor SCR-Contra�u�t U6o/ R 7% 2% OP Agree 2% Law-Enf Improv. (SCRR A) 2% 10 % Vandalism 2% Mechanical 18% TRK-Contractor 1% SIG -Contractor 9% Passenger 2% Includes Weekend Service % of Train Delays By Responsibility 12 Month. Period . Ending. December 2002 10% Vandalism Mechanical 0 4% 14% OP Agree Law-Enf 2% 1°/0 BNSF 32% • PERFO RM ANCE CHARTS -BACK-UP /[(�«)II METROLINK • • CD CD METROLINK AVER AGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED Dec 01 Jan 02 Feb 02 Mar 02 Apr 02 Jun 02 Jul 02 Aug 02 Sep 02 Oct 02 Nov 02 Dec 02 3,144 3,566 3,612 3,650 3441 3,565 3,781 3,664 3,506 3,770 3,759 3,402 4,898 4,813 5,031 5,135 4913 5,597 5,694 5,840 5,694 5,495 5,704 6,011 5,437 9,391 10,086 10,235 10124 9,817 9,688 10,141 10,328 10,411 9,516 452 480 464 518 507 525 533 510 524 531 541 532 497 4,223 4,596 4,615 4524 4,288 4,202 4,159 4,444 4,031 5,369 5,865 5,882 5,931 5848 5,794 5,651 5,519 5,556 5,432 5,465 5,372 4,802 2,733 2,930 3,010 3,033 2791 2,916 2,982 3,092 3,053 3,140 3,139 2,730 97 107 109 109 847 1,165 1,292 1,378 1,492 1,617 30,307 32,443 32,978 33,097 32257 33,571 34,294 33,759 33,485 34,109 34,912 35,160 32,032 Change Dec 02 vs Nov 02 -9% -10% -9% -7% -9% -11% -13% 8% -9% % Change Dec 02 vs Dec 01 8% 11% 1% 10% -5% -11% 0% 1567% 6% -8% 7% 2% 0% -3% 4% 2% -2% -1% 2% 2% 1% -9% • An u, TnhI 00 cz„ ADR MoNew.xls Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000 2500- 2000- 1500- 1000- 500- 0� Dec 01 Jan Note: Sept Includes L. A. County Fair Riders Feb San Bernardino. Line . Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02 Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000- 2500- 2000 1500 1000 500- Dec 01 Jan Note: Sunday Service Began 06/25/00` San. Bernardino . Line Sunday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02 • 410 n919WK nndN ow Antelope Valley Line Saturday Service Average. Daily Passenger Trips Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000- 2500- 2000 - 1500 - 1000 - Dec 01 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02 No te: Sept In cludes L.A . County Fair Riders1 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 - Riv erside Line Saturday Ser vice Average Daily. Passenger Trips Dec 01 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Note: Service Began June 24, 2000 - Service Discontinued January 19, 2002 • Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -02 • • 1n C) METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SU MMARY Percentage of Trains Arri ving. Within 5 Minut es of Scheduled. Time LATEST 13 MONTHS m, ...3c. .g.a .. .. . ..,,. t . .. ,c;,. ., ,. -,., nvy . A• .z . .a a• .. ,. ` "''&. "k �'1�i ., ,w .., , ..�.. x. '� .: ... nlln tta3., * .�,,. .. .w . ad . r, .. w a 97% .;.� ... �1%�a . 97% ,_IIMm 100% § 88% 92% t,J,.. v h�. . .. _ ,. .. 97 % "b'y� ��'_�3 88% �.. tv5�'.�AM y � � .,r ,..z �.( c ._..o. %_ 94% 98% 7._a. k. .. N =.d4 w 95% .. 95 % Zr ya; �I , .$ 3b rf�%W � .��'?; , e � ... 96% 96% . .� .�., p ,.. . 96% Nov 01 98% 100% 97% 97% 98% Dec01 98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 97% 98 % 99% 91% 90% 91 % 93% 93% 93% 95 % 92 % 96 % 96% 96% Jan 02 98% 99% 99% 100% 97% 96% 100% 99% 91% 86% 97% 94% 92% 95 % 73% 98% 96% 96% 96 % Feb 02 98% 100% 97% 97% 97 % 97 % 99% 98 % 95% 81 % 91 % 97% 90% 98 % 85 % 95 % 95% 96% 96% Mar02 100% 99% 97% 94% 97% 97 % 99 % 100% 92% 94% 98% 96% 95% 95 % 86% 98 % 97% 96% 97% Apr02 99% 100% 97% 93% 98% 95% 100% 99 % 94% 98% 91% 96% 97% 94 % 95 % 95 % 96% 96% 96% May 02 99% 97% 98% 98% 97% 96% 100 % 98 % 96% 92% 89 % 87% 87% 92% 87 % 83% 95 % 94 % 94% Jun 02 99% 98% 98% 99% 98% 96% 99% 97% 95% 97 % 93 % 96 % 94% 90% 95% 90% 97% 96 % 96% Jul02 99% 99% 98% 95% 98% 99% 100% 99 % 99% 96% 91% 95 % 93 % 90% 92% 92% 97 % 96 % 96 % Aug 02 100% 97% 99% 96% 96% 91% 100% 99% 97% 95% 89 % 91% 92 % 90% 91 % 90 % 96% 94% 95 % Sep 02 98% 99% 95% 94% 94% 91% 98% 98% 96 % 98% 85% 92 % 94% 84% 89 % 92% 94 % 93 % 94% Oct 02 99% 98% 99% 99% 96% 95% 98% 95% 95% 96% 92 % 96% 93 % 93% 92% 96% 96% 96% 96 % Nov 02 98% 97% 98% 97% 94% 84% 100% 99% 97% 98 % 88% 89% 92 % 95% 86% 94 % 94% 93% 94 % Dec 02 98% 97% 98% 97% 97% 91% 99% 100% 97% 97% 96% 97% 90% 93% 93 % 96% 96% 95% 96% Peak Perio d Trains Arriv ing Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time i Eau :, Dec 02 Peak Period Trains 96% 96% 100% 96% 98% 89% ...,. .i�K 98% 100% 97% 97% 95% 98 % 87% 92% 93% 95% 96 % 95% 96% No adjustments hav e been made for relievable delays. Terminated trains are considered OT if they were on -time at point of termination. A nnulled trains are not included in the on -time calculation. • 11 • 11T 41\Ir./.lw. ., CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS. DECEMBER 2002 PRIMARY. CAUSE OF TRAIN. DELAYS. GREATER THAN. 5. MINUTES CAUSE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC INL/OC R/F/L TOTAL % of TOT Signals/Detectors 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 8 7% Slow Orders/MOW 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 14 12% Track/Switch 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 3% Dispatching 2 0 2 0 1 8 13 7 33 28% Mechanical 3 3 8 0 4 3 2 0 23 19 % Freight Train 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Amtrak Train 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 6 5% Metrolink Meet/Turn 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1% Vandalism 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2% Passenger(s) 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 3% SCRRA Hold. Policy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Other 1 8 10 0 0 0 5 0 24 20% TOTAL 12 13 37 1 8 15 22 10 118 100% • • Saturday SNB 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Saturday AVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 Sunday SNB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 •12CAUS FREQUENCY OF TRAIN DELAYS BY DURATION DECEMBER 2002 MINUTES LA TE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC IE/OC RIV/FUL TOTAL % of TOT NO DELAY 369 444 338 225 223 344 198 164 2305 80.2% 1 MIN - 5 MIN 38 47 254 3 21 40 32 15 450 15.7% 6MIN -10 M IN 6 5 17 0 2 5 4 4 43 1.5 % 11 MIN - 20 MIN 5 3 15 1 1 7 10 4 46 1.6% 21 MIN - 30 MIN 0 1 3 0 2 1 3 1 11 0 .4% GREATER THAN 30 MIN 1 4 2 0 3 2 5 1 18 0.6% ANNULLED 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 6 0 .2% TOTAL TRAINS OPTD 419 504 629 229 252 399 252 189 2873 100 % TRAINS DELAYED >0 min 50 60 291 4 29 55 54 25 568 19.8% TRAINS DELAYED > 5 min 12 13 37 1 8 15 22 10 118 4.1% • • •REQ • • Daily Activity Report Metrolink Stations Generated from 10/01/02 to 12/31/02 Riverside Pedley La Sierra W. Corona N Corona Total 1 - Standard Procedures 1A - RCTC Staff on Site 2 1B - Customer Assistance 94 1C - Ambassador on Site 105 Total 201 1 1 0 2 6 92 91 93 40 410 4 28 23 18 178 97 120 116 60 594 2 - Criminal Incidents 2D - Criminal Behavior 1 0 0 0 0 1 2E - Grafitti 1 0 0 0 0 1 Total 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 - Maintenance/Repairs 4A - Lights 6 0 0 2 3 11 4B - TVM / Validator Machine 24 16 8 12 12 72 4C - Elevator 2 0 6 0 0 8 4D - Station Cleaning 34 31 18 31 1 115 4E - Landscaping 19 20 6 20 0 65 4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 0 1 0 0 0 1 4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 8 25 11 22 3 69 4G - Pepsi Vending 2 0 0 1 0 3 4H - Other 12 1 12 8 1 34 Total 107 94 61 96 20 378 5 - Miscellaneous 5A - Miscellaneous Activity 27 Total 27 6 - Parked Overnight • 6A - Parked Ovemight 27 Total 27 7 - Overflow * 7A - Veh. In Overflow 11 64 40 6 148 11 4 64 40 6 148 8 9 5 53 4 0 0 8 9 5 53 64 0 0 64 Total 0 0 8 - Parking Citations 8A - Parking Citations 0 Total 0 9 -Empty Spaces * 9A - Empty Spaces 61 Total 61 91 - R2R Vehicles * 91A - R2R Vehicles 6 Total 6 92 - Vehicles Parked * 92A - Vehicles Parked 0 64 0 0 64 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 270 6 337 0 1 0 270 6 337 6 5 0 18 1 O 0 6 5 0 18 O 0 244 244 Total O 0 0 0 244 244 * Value is averaged over the data entry days Thursday, January 16, 2003 nonov Riverside - Do wntown Activity D etail Report Genera ted from 10/1/02 to 12/31/02 Activity Subtype # Vehicles D ate Time Activity Log # Descriptio n Activity Type 10/13/2002 64226 Graffiti noted on blue recycle bin front of statio 2 - Criminal Incidents 12/5/2002 10:00am 65232 Indiv. in custody for public intoxication 2 - Criminal Incidents 2E - Grafitti 2D - Criminal Behavior 0 0 Thursda y, Jan uary 16, 2003 Page 1 of 1