HomeMy Public PortalAbout02-06-2006 Village Meeting
VILLAGE OF PLAINFIELD
MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 6, 2006
AT: VILLAGE HALL
PRESENT: J.WALDORF, P.FAY, B.LAMB, W.MANNING, M.COLLINS, J.RACICH, AND
J.DEMENT. ALSO PRESENT WERE: S.JANIK, VILLAGE CLERK; J.HARVEY, ATTORNEY;
C.MINICK, ADMINISTRATOR; S.LARSON, ENGINEER; A.PERSONS, PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR; M.GARRIGAN, VILLAGE PLANNER, V.HASTINGS, GIS COORDINATOR;
J.PROULX, PLANNER; A.DE BONI, COMMUNITY RELATIONS DIRECTOR; M.EITING,
DEPUTY CHIEF OF POLICE; AND M.GIBAS, DEPUTY CLERK.
Mayor Waldorf called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken, all Trustees were
present. Clerk Janik led the pledge to the flag. There were approximately 30 persons in the audience.
PRESIDENTIAL COMMENTS
Mr. Brook McDonald, The Conservation Foundation, presented a plaque to the Mayor and the Board
of Trustees thanking them for their efforts to preserve open space in Kendall County by assisting with
Protect Kendal Now.
Trustee Dement moved to adopt Resolution No. 1484 opposing the surgical center being proposed by
Rush, Provena, and Adventist in Plainfield and request a hearing by the Illinois Health Facilities
Planning Board on the project. Seconded by Trustee Racich. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb,
yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
Trustee Dement moved to adopt Resolution No. 1485 opposing Rush-Copley’s expansion to add 26
beds to their campus and request a hearing by the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board on the
project. Seconded by Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes;
Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
TRUSTEE’S COMMENTS
Trustee Dement stated that the election will be soon and asked for the Clerk to inform everyone of
the campaigning rules and also asked that the Police Department enforce the rules. Trustee Collins
informed everyone that the Joliet Historical Museum, 204 N. Ottawa, will host a pictorial post card
history and collector’s guide to Plainfield on February 19 at 2:00 p.m. The collection is that of Tim
and Michelle Smith from 1906 to 1960. Administrator Minick stated that in response to Trustee
Dement’s request, the staff will put together a report and give an update at the next meeting regarding
the campaigning rules. Trustee Fay stated recently he made some statements regarding our historic
downtown and his position and statements regarding the downtown Plainfield District and its
residents and businesses is just that. It comes out of a sense of concern for the advancement of
MainStreet but not only MainStreet, all the businesses and organizations in the downtown. He is not
trying to meddle in anyone’s affair, he is simply trying to advance a better communication system.
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 2 of 10
PUBLIC COMMENTS on Items Not on the Agenda
No public comments.
BUSINESS MEETING
Clerk Janik asked to amend the Agenda to add at the end an Executive Session for purposes of
personnel, not to reconvene; and to amend the Consent Agenda to remove a payment for Comstock
from the Bills Payable Report in the amount of $287,187.39.
Trustee Fay moved to approve the Amended Agenda. Seconded by Trustee Dement. Vote by roll
call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no.
Motion carried.
Trustee Fay moved to approve the amended consent agenda to Minutes of the Board Meeting of
January 23, 2006; Bills Paid Report and amended Bills Payable Report for February 6, 2006; Letter
of Credit Reductions for Shenandoah Subdivision Units 1 and 2, Arbor Creek Units 1 and 2, and
Eagle Chase Units 1 and 2; Ordinance No. 2533 adopting recapture for costs of roadway
th
improvements to Van Dyke Road south of 127 Street for the Kensington Club/Van Dyke Road
Recapture Agreement; and Ordinance No. 2534 adopting recapture for costs of roadway
thth
improvements to 135 Street generally east of Heggs Road for Prairie Ponds/135 Street Road
Recapture Agreement. Seconded by Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes;
Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
#3 ARBOR CREEK UPDATE
Administrator Minick stated that he met with Mr. Morris Jones, Arbor Creek Drive Resident; Mr.
Stanley Paulauskas, Arbor Creek Drive Resident; Kurt Lindstrom, Hamilton Engineering; and Bob
Ackerly, Krugoff Builders to discuss the issues with regard to the backyard erosion. It was discussed
that the Village would honor a previous agreement with the homeowners to provide the engineering
services to identify the cause of the problem and design a solution to remediate the problem.
Construction of the remediation measures was to be at the homeowners’ expense. Since the
homeowners undertook the work without a permit and without making provisions to sufficiently
stabilize the soil they were using, Mr. Ackerly from Krugoff stated that their position is that this is
the homeowners issue and will not participate in the remediation. The next step is for the
homeowners to come up with the solution that they would like to implement, Hamilton Engineers
will then design the solution, and the homeowners will be responsible to have the improvement
constructed at their own expense. Staff is seeking Board support for the course of action to provide
and fund the engineering services to design the remediation measures and then to remove ourselves
from the process.
Mr. Morris Jones, Arbor Creek Drive resident, stated that he is not happy with the results and asked
for the Board to give him some time to do some more research. There was a fault there before his
house was built and it is quite possible that it came back again. He and his neighbor, Stan
Paulauskas, sit farther back than the other homeowners. When the yard initially started sinking, the
builder brought in dirt. The yard fell again the following year, so he continued doing what the
builder had done previously. He was not trying to make a flat yard. Mr. Stanley Paulauskas, Arbor
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 3 of 10
Creek Drive Resident, stated that his scenario is the same as Mr. Jones. The builder brought dirt to
level out everything; there was a big hole. The following spring it fell down and we brought more
dirt. The dirt was brought in by subcontractors of the developer. It was their truck, their people, their
equipment, we didn’t hire anybody. Mr. Minick asked if the homeowner paid for the dirt. Mr.
Paulauskas replied that he paid the driver a $20 tip. Mr. Minick stated that is contrary to what was
indicated in the meeting. Mr. Bob Akerly, Krugoff, stated that wasn’t what happened in the meeting.
There was something similar to 10-15 loads of dirt brought into that yard by Mr. Paulauskas and Mr.
Jones. Most of the dirt is in Mr. Paulauskas’ yard. The engineering was all done, the complete area
is treed and it was all taken back to grade. We did not haul in and fill in anything other that what was
called for on the grading plan. We have all the documentation and it has been given to the Village,
plus they have their own that this was all a closed issue. They are just looking for somebody to fix
the mess that they created and he (Mr. Akerly) told them that we could not help them and that the
Village went far beyond their duty. The cheapest option for them is to pull the dirt out that was
brought in and the second cheapest option is to build a retaining wall which they do not want to spend
the money on. Mr. Minick stated that Mr. Akerly’s summation is pretty accurate. We’ve looked at
the documentation, we’ve done the investigations and we’ve done the soil borings and the
engineering. It is staff’s recommendation that we honor the previous commitment that we had to
provide the engineering for the remediation measure and then excuse ourselves from the situation.
Trustee Collins asked how many residents are involved. Mr. Minick replied that these are the only
two residents that he is aware of. Mr. Morris Jones stated that he and Mr. Paulauskas probably have
the most problems because they are pushed farther back. Some of his neighbors have had similar
situations. Mr. Jones stated that he closed in March and at that time the developer was not ready to
do the grading. He wants to go through his documents to see if there is documentation of the
condition his yard was left in. Mr. Bob Akerly stated that there were no other homeowners in that
subdivision that have complained about anything. Mr. Morris stated that there was a fault on that
property before he moved in. Something was not done right. He’s been living there for 5 years, and
the property falls every year. Mr. Akerly pointed out that the homeowners have also buried their
downspouts and that is adding to the problem.
Trustee Lamb stated that he read through all of the paperwork and understands the various points of
view. He would like to gather a couple of learnings from this. One, he thinks it is a very professional
investigation, everybody cooperated and talked it through, and got all the facts out. Hindsight
suggests that nobody came out as a winner. The Village has spent money and time to do it, the
homeowners have spend a considerable amount of time and money trying to get things resolved, and
so has the builder. One thing that does come out clearly is that engineering evaluations are very
appropriate.
Trustee Dement asked what is the Village going to do to remediate. Mr. Minick stated that the
homeowners have requested that the drawings be done for a modular block retaining wall. Trustee
Dement asked the homeowners if that was true. Mr. Morris and Mr. Paulauskas both replied yes.
Trustee Dement moved to do the engineering to hopefully alleviate this problem. Trustee Collins
stated that if the Village is going to do the drawings, but the homeowners are not willing to building
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 4 of 10
the retaining walls, aren’t we just throwing money into the wind. Mr. Morris Jones stated that the
problem lies with the builder. Something wasn’t done right and he shouldn’t have to pay. The cost
of the retaining wall was quoted by Hamilton to be approximately $85,000. That’s an awful lot of
money. Mr. Minick stated that the retaining wall figure was based on the fact that we were going to
change the engineering grade significantly and create a usable backyard. Mr. Kurt Lindstrom,
Hamilton Engineers stated that the height of wall would need to be between 8’ to 10’. Mr. Minick
pointed out that a smaller wall can be built and there would be less of a backyard.
Trustee Dement removed his motion.
Trustee Collins stated that he would need a commitment from the homeowners to construct the
improvement before he would support spending money on the engineering. Mr. Lindstrom pointed
out that the Village has already spent about 85% of the total for engineering. It would cost
approximately $7,000 more to generate structural engineering specifications for the project. Trustee
Manning asked what the cost of the geotextile screening solution that was mentioned in the staff
report would be to the homeowners. Mr. Lindstrom replied approximately $20,000.
Trustee Racich stated that staff is seeking support to design remediation and to then remove ourselves
from the process. We need to remove ourselves from the process otherwise we are going to be
establishing a very dangerous precedent by financing every remediation that a homeowner has. We
can work closely with the homeowners and go with the guidelines outlined by the Village
Administrator.
Trustee Racich moved to support the course of action to provide and fund engineering services to
design remediation measures and thereafter remove ourselves from process. Due to lack of a second,
the motion died.
Trustee Lamb stated that if the homeowners do not pursue the construction of the mediation then why
should the Village spend the additional money. If the homeowners agree to leave the Village and the
developer out of it, we can spend the additional money as we have agreed to do for whatever proposal
that they decide to go with. There doesn’t seem to be agreement on the wall so to do additional
design work would not be appropriate. Trustee Lamb stated the he would make that a motion.
Trustee Manning stated that he would second that motion that the homeowners must agree that the
parties can be removed when the homeowners accept the solution.
Trustee Lamb moved to fund the engineering design of the remediation option when the homeowners
decided on an option and to agree that the Village and the Developer will be removed from the
process. Seconded by Trustee Manning. Vote by roll call. Fay, abstain; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes;
Collins, no; Racich, no; Dement, no. 2 yes, 3 no, 1 abstain. Motion failed.
Trustee Fay stated that his reluctance to vote and to say anything to this point as in times past, there
are many factors involved. He would personally like to talk to the engineering firm and perhaps the
residents as well. He thinks that there may be another issue here in what he is perceiving as an
increase of residential property issues before the Board. Trustee Fay asked Mayor Waldorf on his
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 5 of 10
thoughts for a different way of handling the resident foundation issues or some sort of process for
remediation . Mayor Waldorf stated that we can explore other communities that have options above
and beyond ours. Mr. Minick stated that typically government does not participate in remediation
between residents and homeowners. Trustee Fay suggested a remediation team. Trustee Manning
stated that is exactly what the Administrator did when he met with the developer and the citizens; he
remediated what he thought was an agreement. Trustee Fay that he doesn’t feel that he has all the
information he needs to discern or to deliberate. Trustee Collins stated that if the Village
Administrator and staff researched the complaints and find that there is no culpability on behalf of the
Village then we are done and the homeowners can move on. Trustee Lamb stated the investigation
was a first class job and their conclusions were good. The Village was very generous in agreeing to
do the design work. Trustee Dement stated that the Village went more than ½ way on this issue and
he would certainly rather go the extra mile to remediate some issues.
Trustee Racich moved to support the course of action to provide and fund engineering services to
design a remediation measure then to remove ourselves from the process, the Homeowners will have
input on what remediation measure to design. Seconded by Trustee Lamb.
Trustee Dement stated that he could not support spending Village money without a commitment from
the homeowners to construct the remediation. Trustee Dement clarified that if the homeowners
decide not to take any of the solutions offered that nothing will be done.
Vote by roll call. Fay, no; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, no; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 4 yes,
2 no. Motion carried.
Trustee Collins asked to have the Board updated as to the outcome of this issue.
#4 PLAINFIELD ART LEAGUE GRANT
The Plainfield Art League was awarded a grant of $5,000 for 2005 by the Mayor and the Board of
Trustees. The Art League received $2,500 in June of 2005 and is now requesting the balance of the
funding. Mr. Dick Splant of the Art League stated that they will be the art supplier of the new
Edward Medical Facility.
Trustee Dement asked for the staff to review the budget and financial procedures of the Art League.
Trustee Fay moved to award the balance of the grant in the amount of $2,500.00. Seconded by
Trustee Dement. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes;
Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
TH
#5 5 ANNUAL PLAINFIELD IRISH PARADE
Deputy Chief Eiting stated that he does not foresee a problem with the parade.
th
Trustee Fay moved to approve the 5 Annual Irish Parade to be held on Sunday, March 19, at 1:00
p.m. sponsored by the Village Preservation Association of Plainfield. Seconded by Trustee Racich.
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 6 of 10
Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes,
0 no. Motion carried.
#6 MEIJER
Mr. Garrigan stated that the applicant is requesting re-approval of the final plat because the original
mylar of the approved final plat was not recorded within 90 days of the Village Board’s original
approval.
Trustee Dement moved to reapprove the final subdivision plat of the Meijer Plainfield Subdivision.
Seconded by Trustee Fay. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes;
Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
#7 CHATHAM SQUARE
Mr. Garrigan stated that the applicant is seeking final plat approval of the first phase of development
of Chatham Square. The proposed plan is consistent with the Concept Plan contained in the
Annexation Agreement. Staff and the Plan Commission recommend approval.
Trustee Collins moved to approve the Chatham Square Phase I final plat of subdivision, subject to the
3 stipulations listed in the staff report. Seconded by Trustee Dement. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes;
Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
#8 LIBERTY GROVE RECAPTURE
Mr. Garrigan stated that recapture agreement is for the construction of off-site sanitary sewer
improvements in conjunction with the Liberty Grove development. The recapture agreement is
consistent with the standard recapture agreement for the Village.
Trustee Fay moved to direct the Village Attorney to draft an ordinance to adopt recapture for costs of
sanitary sewer improvements in the vicinity of the Liberty Grove Subdivision, as detailed in the
Agreement Authorizing Reimbursement for the Construction of Improvements Beneficial to the
Public. Seconded by Trustee Dement. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes;
Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
#9 LOT 13 IN THE MENARDS OF PLAINFIELD SUBDIVISION
Mr. Garrigan stated that the applicant is requesting site plan review of Lot 13 in the Menards of
Plainfield Subdivision for a proposed multi-tenant retail/office building. The lot is approximately .89
th
acres and is located on 135 Street, immediately east of the Tuffy Muffler building. The Plan
Commission recommends approval.
Trustee Fay questioned if previous issues with the developer have been resolved. Mr. Persons stated
that the developer has rectified the issues. Trustee Collins commented that he liked the architecture.
Trustee Lamb asked if staff was comfortable with the traffic flow and trash enclosure. Mr. Garrigan
stated that staff was comfortable with what is being proposed.
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 7 of 10
Trustee Manning moved to accept the recommendation of the Plan Commission and approve the site
plan for Lot 13 in the Menards of Plainfield Subdivision subject to the 3 stipulations listed in the staff
report. Seconded by Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins,
yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
#10 VILLAGE SANITARY SEWER RECAPTURE AGREEMENTS
Trustee Fay moved to adopt Resolution No.1487, a resolution authorizing reimbursement for the
construction of improvements beneficial to the public for the Route 30 Relief Sewer. Seconded by
Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes;
Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
Trustee Fay moved to adopt Resolution No.1488, a resolution authorizing reimbursement for the
construction of improvements beneficial to the public for the Lockport Area Sanitary Sewer.
Seconded by Trustee Dement. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes;
Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT
No Report.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
No Report.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
Ms. Valerie Hastings, GIS Coordinator, stated that the proposal for GIS Implementation Services for
Patrick Engineering, Inc. are services related to the development and expansion of the Village’s GIS
database to include layer development, training for staff, and quality checks for the planimetric data.
Trustee Manning left the meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Trustee Dement moved to approve the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Development
Agreement between the Village and Patrick Engineering, Inc. for services totaling $26,000.00.
Seconded by Trustee Fay. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, absent; Collins, yes;
Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 5 yes, 0 no, 1 absent. Motion carried.
Star Line Station
Mr. Jon Proulx, Planner, stated that Solomon, Cordwell, Buenz (SCB) was contracted to help the
Village primarily to determine the amount of acreage and general layout of the station site. The work
has included working with the Kellers (landowner) and the Morgan/Harbour (contract purchaser).
Mr. Harbour is willing to work with the Village if there is a common vision for the property and
based on the upcoming expiration of the contract, Mr. Harbour is seeking input from the Board on
support for a general concept.
Trustee Manning returned at 8:15 p.m.
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 8 of 10
Ms. Christine Carlyle, SCB, reviewed three Transit Oriented Development concept plans highlighting
density, commercial, industrial, open space, and parking spaces with the Board for the subject
property.
Trustee Fay stated that in general he supports Transit Oriented Developments. It is too premature to
discuss density and building types. Trustee Fay also added that there must be adequate roadways to
the east and to the north. Trustee Collins expressed some concern regarding the number of parking
spaces. Mr. Proulx pointed out that there is opportunity for parking on the east side, but the concepts
tonight only focus on this property. Trustee Lamb stated that overall mixed use would work very
well and would help to support the downtown area. He likes the idea of buffering the light
industrial. He suspects the density will work and also liked light industrial. Trustee Manning stated
that he supports the multi-use for the area and he has great sympathy for density because the staff has
made a compelling argument that the density is necessary to support our downtown as it expands
west of the river. Trustee Dement asked what kind of truck traffic would be brought to the downtown
because of the light industrial. Mr. Harbour responded that the light industrial is proposed to be at
the north end of the development that would be next to existing light industrial. Mr. Harbour stated
that he can do a great job with the train station and he supports Concept B. Trustee Dement also
commented that the open space seems lacking and that he will be concerned about the architecture
and what the buildings will look like. He wants to see brick buildings. He could support the raised
density with additional amenities such as architecture, open space, and roadways. Trustee Racich
asked for the timeline. Ms. Carlyle responded that the development will be fully phased and it could
be 10 years before the station is active. Mr. Harbour stated that without the train station, the
development does not make sense. He knows it is a long-term project but is hoping that the train
station is less than 10 years away.
PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
Trustee Fay moved to authorize the Village President to execute a contract with the low bidder, P.T.
Ferro Construction, for the construction of Drauden Rod from Indian Boundary Road to IL Route 126
at a total bid amount of $2,473,046.02. Seconded by Trustee Racich. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes;
Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
Trustee Fay moved to authorize the Village President to execute an Engineering Services Agreement
with H.W. Lochner, Inc. for the Phase I Engineering Design of the Plainfield/Naperville Road and
th
127 Street Intersection Improvements and Signalization at a cost not to exceed $202,789.19.
Seconded by Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes;
Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
Trustee Fay moved to authorize the Village President to execute an Engineering Service Agreement
with Hamilton Engineers to administer the 2006 MFT Street Resurfacing Program at a cost of
$72,970.96. Seconded by Trustee Dement. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes;
Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 9 of 10
Trustee Collins questioned why Hazelcrest Drive was not included in the MFT Street Resurfacing
Program. Mr. Persons stated that the Hazelcrest Drive project would be a reconstruction project and
not a resurfacing project.
Trustee Manning moved to waive the bidding and authorize Nikolson Construction to install required
water and sewer improvements north of Springhole Creek at a cost not to exceed $130,000.00.
Seconded by Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes;
Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
POLICE CHIEF’S REPORT
Trustee Fay moved to adopt Ordinance No. 2535 amending the Code of Ordinance regarding Noise
Regulations. Seconded by Trustee Dement. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes;
Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
Trustee Fay asked the staff to look into an ordinance regarding airbrakes.
Trustee Collins moved to approve the purchase of a 2006 Chevrolet Impala from Miles Chevrolet
under the State of Illinois Contract pricing for vehicle replacement. Seconded by Trustee Fay. Vote
by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes; Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0
no. Motion carried.
ATTORNEY’S REPORT
No Report.
Mayor Waldorf reminded everyone of the Plan Commission Meeting on February 7, the Historic
Preservation Commission Meeting on February 9, the Committee of the Whole Workshop on
February 13, and that the Village Offices will be closed in honor of President’s Day on February 20.
Trustee Racich reminded everyone that on February 11 at 10:00a.m. the Chamber of Commerce is
rd
having its 3 Annual Business Fair.
Trustee Fay moved to adjourn to Executive Session for the purposes of Personnel, not to reconvene.
Seconded by Trustee Collins. Vote by roll call. Fay, yes; Lamb, yes; Manning, yes; Collins, yes;
Racich, yes; Dement, yes. 6 yes, 0 no. Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Michelle Gibas, Deputy Clerk
Approved:
Susan Janik, Village Clerk
Village of Plainfield
Meeting Minutes – February 6, 2006
Page 10 of 10