Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout11 November 26, 2001 Budget & Implementation• • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TIME: 2:30 p.m. DATE: Monday, November 26, 2001 RECORDS LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 - Conference Room A Riverside, CA 92501 VIDEO CONF SITE: City of La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico - Section Room ...COMMITTEE MEMBERS... John Hunt, Chair / Jan Wages, City of Banning Phil Stack, Vice Chair / Harvey Gerber, City of Rancho Mirage Placido Valdivia / Roger Berg, City of Beaumont Gregory S. Pettis / Sarah DeGrandi, City of Cathedral City Juan DeLara / Lupe Dominguez, City of Coachella Mike Wilson / Marcos Lopez, City of Indio John Pena / Ron Perkins, City of La Quinta Kevin Pape / Robert Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore Bonnie Flickinger / Frank West, City of Moreno Valley Ameal Moore / Joy Defenbaugh, City of Riverside John Tavaglione, District Two / County of Riverside Jim Venable, District Three / County of Riverside Patrick Williams / Chris Carlson-Buydos / City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula ... STAFF ... Eric Haley, Executive Director Marilyn Williams, Director of Regional Issues and Communications ... AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY... Annual Budget Development and Oversight Countywide Strategic Plan Legislation Measure "A" Implementation and Capital Programs Public Communications and Outreach Programs Competitive Grant Programs: TEA 21-CMAQ & STP, Transportation Enhancement and SB 821 -Bicycle & Pedestrian Property Management SAFE/Freeway Service Patrol and other areas as may be prescribed by the Commission Comments are welcomed by the Committee. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE http://www.rctc.org 3560 University Ave - Riverside, CA 92501 - Conference Room A PARK IN THE PARKING GARAGE ACROSS FROM THE POST OFFICE ON ORANGE STREET MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2001 - 2:30 P.M. AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda City of La Quinta City Hall (Video Conference Location) 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta 92253 - Session Room 1 CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (October 29, 2001) 5. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 5A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORTS- P. 01 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Reports for the month ending October 31, 2001; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee November 26, 2001 Page 2 • • • 5B. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT - P. 05 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30 2001; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6. EXPANSION IN SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT TO CLEAR THE MEASURE "A" SR 79 WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN NEWPORT ROAD AND KELLER AVENUE - P. 17 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval of: 1) The concept that the environmental document will have to cover an expanded scope in order to deliver for construction the Measure "A" State Route 79 (SR 79) widening project between Newport Road and Keller Avenue (the Project); 2) Authorize staff to complete negotiations on acceptable scope of Environmental Document to permit the construction of the Measure Project with both the County of Riverside and Caltrans; 3) Bring back agreements to the Committee for final review and approval that provide a level of surety that the County of Riverside will assist in paying for both the increase in scope of the environmental document and for any construction outside the limits of the original Measure Project; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee November 26, 2001 Page 3 • • • 7. APPROVAL OF SERVICES CONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 02- 31-917 WITH COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REAL PROPERTY SERVICES FOR SR -79 REALIGNMENT PROJECT — P. 24 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Enter into contract No. 02-31-917 for real property services with County of Riverside Facilities Management/Real Estate Division. The contract will be for labor to obtain property right -of -entry for an amount not to exceed $19,800 with a contingency amount of $2,000 for a total not to exceed value of $21,800; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 8. STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT PROJECT AMENDMENT TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONTRACT WITH DMJM + HARRIS — P. 43 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Enter into Agreement No. 02-31-035, Amendment No. 1 to contract RO-2127, with DMJM + Harris to perform Water Quality Monitoring and Sampling for a Base amount of $52,410, and a 14% contingency amount of $7,590 for a total contract amount not to exceed $60,000; Budget and Implementation Committee November 26, 2001 Page 4 • • • 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for fin& action. 9. STATE ROUTE 60 HOV PROJECT DESIGN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS NO. 8-1173 BETWEEN CALTRANS AND RCTC — P. 49 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval of: 1) The attached form of agreement in order to enter into cooperative Agreement No. 8-1173 with Caltrans for the design work of the State Route 60 HOV Project from I-215/SR60 Interchange to Redlands Boulevard; 2) Authorize the Executive director to negotiate the final changes required; 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. 10 AGREEMENT #02-33-036, AMENDMENT #4 TO EXISTING DMJM + HARRIS ENGINEERING DESIGN CONTRACT #RO- 2027, FOR ADDITIONAL RAILROAD FINAL PS&E DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE DOWNTOWN CORONA METROLINK STATION — P. 72 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: Budget and Implementation Committee November 26, 2001 Page 5 1) Enter into Agreement # 02-33-036, Amendment #4 to existing Contract No. RO-2027, for DMJM + HARRIS to provide additional railroad survey Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Design Services for the proposed new Metrolink Commuter Rail Station in Downtown Corona, for an amount not to exceed $44,337. The total value of the original contract, all amendments, this agreement and the contingency shall not exceed $1,289,337; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT — P. 80 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Increase the budget for equipment maintenance costs in the Motorist Assistance Department; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 12. REGIONAL ARTERIAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS — P. 81 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Increase the expenditure budget for the Coachella Valley Regional Arterial Program by $4,800,000; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee November 26, 2001 Page 6 • • 13. FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 AUDIT RESULTS — P. 82 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Receive and file Ernst and Young's Audit reports for Fiscal Year 2000-2001; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSED 2001/2002 STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM - P. 83 Overview This item is to seek Committee approval of: 1) The Proposed 2001/2002 Federal and State Legislative Programs; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 15. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 16. ADJOURNMENT — The next meeting is scheduled at 2:30 p.m. on Monday, January 28, 2002. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DECEMBER COMMITTEE MEETINGS HAVE BEEN CANCELLED. • AGENDA ITE/ti4 MINUTE; • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE Monday, October 29, 2001 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee was called to order by Chairman John Hunt at 2:30 p.m., at the offices of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100, Riverside, California, 92501 and at the video conference location in the City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta 92253. 2. ROLL CALL Members/Alternates Present Chris Carlson-Buydos Sarah DeGrandi* John Hunt Ameal Moore Kevin Pape John Pena* Ron Roberts Phil Stack John Tavaglione Placido Valdivia Frank West Members Absent Juan DeLara Jim Venable Mike Wilson *Attended meeting via video conference 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests from the public to speak. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 27, 2001 M/S/C (Stack/Roberts) to approve the August 27, 2001 minutes as written. • Abstain: DeGrandi Budget and Implementation Committee Meeting October 29, 2001 Page 2 5. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos/Stack) to approve the Consent Calendar. 5A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT 1) Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending September 30, 2001; and, 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 5B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT 1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the months ending July and August 2001; and, 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 5C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ending September 30, 2001; and, 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. 6. STUDY OF CURVE REALIGNMENT ON ROUTE 74 FROM WINCHESTER ROAD TO WARREN ROAD M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1) Authorize the Executive Director to enter into Agreement No. 02-31-028 with Advanced Digital Maps, Inc. to perform aerial mapping services along SR 74 between Winchester Road to Warren Road under a single signature contract for $16,600, and a 20% contingency amount of $3,400 for a total contract amount not to exceed $20,000, pursuant Legal Counsel review; 2) Authorize the Executive Director to approve Task 1, Agreement No. 02-31-027 to the On -Call Engineering Services Contract RO-2061 with SC Engineering for a contract amount of $14,965 with extra work amount of $2,035 for a total not to exceed amount of $17,000, pursuant to Legal Counsel review; and, 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee Meeting October 29, 2001 Page 3 7. ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ALONG THE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FROM RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN STATION TO ROMOLAND Commissioner Frank West asked if the locations to be investigated for the four new stations had been determined. Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director, responded that the approximate locations have been determined pending environmental review. The locations are: 1) the Box Springs area; 2) the Alessandro area; 3) the March ARB joint use area; and, 4) the City of Perris area. Commissioner John Pena asked if a mid -year budget update and review would be presented due to significant dollar items in the agenda that were not budgeted for in this fiscal year and Hideo Sugita responded that a mid- year budget review will be presented to the Committee and the Commission. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1. Award Contract No. 02-33-026 (Amendment No. 5 to Contract No. RO-2128) to STV Inc. to Conduct Environmental Investigations along the San Jacinto Branch Line from Riverside Downtown Station to Romoland for a total amount of $254,320 using a standard contract amendment; 2. Add an additional $40,000 to the existing $62,113 of extra work authorized in previous amendments for a total extra work amount of $102,113; 3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the contract, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission; and, 4. Forward to the Commission for final action. 8. AWARD AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-029 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PARKING LOT EXPANSION PLAN FOR METROLINK STATIONS IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1. Approve the selection process of Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Services to develop and implement a Parking Lot Expansion Plan for the Metrolink Commuter Rail Stations in Riverside County; 2. Authorize the Chairman to enter into Agreement #02-33-029 with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Services for development and implementation of a Parking Lot Expansion Budget and Implementation Committee Meeting October 29, 2001 Page 4 Plan for a Base amount of $196,295.00 with a 20% Extra Work Contingency of $38,705.00 for a total amount of $235,000.00, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission; and, 3. Forward to the Commission for final action. 9. AWARD AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-030 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PASSENGER STATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW DOWNTOWN CORONA METROLINK STATION M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1. Authorize the Chairman to execute Station Agreement No. 02- 33-030 with Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) for construction of passenger station and pedestrian overhead crossing improvements for the proposed new Downtown Corona Metrolink Station, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 10. AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2001-2003 MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF PALM DESERT M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to approve: 1. Amending the FY 01-03 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Palm Desert, as submitted; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 11. FISCAL YEAR 2002-2006 MEASURE "A" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF INDIO M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to approve: 1. The FY 02-06 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Indio, as submitted; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. Budget and Implementation Committee Meeting October 29, 2001 Page 5 • • • 12. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. M21-009 FOR THE OPERATION OF THE FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1. Authorize the Chairman to execute Memorandum of Understanding No. M21-009 between the Riverside County SAFE, the California Department of Transportation, and the California Highway Patrol for the operation of a Freeway Service Patrol program in Riverside County, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 13. AGREEMENT NO. 02-45-032 AMENDING THE FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK AGREEMENT WITH HAMNER TOWING, INC. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to approve: 1. Agreement No. 02-45-032 amending the Freeway Service Patrol Tow Truck Agreement with Hamner Towing, Inc. to add one FSP construction vehicle to Beat No. 4 on SR 91, pursuant to Legal Counsel review; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 14. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 02-45-031 FOR THE OPERATION OF A CONSTRUCTION FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL ON STATE ROUTE 91 M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1. Authorize the Chairman to execute Cooperative Agreement No. 02-45-031 between the State of California Department of Transportation and the Riverside County SAFE, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, for the operation of a Construction Freeway Service Patrol on SR 91; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 15. PLANNING AND CONSERVATION LEAGUE (PCL) - TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF INITIATIVE Marilyn Williams, Director of Regional Issues and Communications, requested that this item be pulled from the agenda. M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to pull this item from the agenda. Budget and Implementation Committee Meeting October 29, 2001 Page 6 16. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE M/S/C (Tavaglione/Carlson-Buydos) to: 1. Receive and file the State and Legislative Update as an information item; and, 2. Forward to the Commission for final action. 17. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR No items were pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. 18. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 2:38 p.m. The next meeting will be at 2:30 p.m., on Monday, November 26, 2001, at the RCTC offices. Respectfully submitted, 411 • Jennifer Harmon Deputy Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM5A W • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Louie Martin, Project Controls Manager Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Contracts Cost and Schedule Reports STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending October 31, 2001; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached material depicts the current costs and schedule status on contracts reported by projects, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date and the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending October 31, 2001. Attachments 000001 PROJECT DESCRIPTI ON ROUTE 60 PROJECTS Final Design HOV 60/215 to Redlands Blvd. (2042) (3000) SIJ87`OTAt ROiI:T :::.::: ROUTE 74 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ/ROW (R02041 9954,9966, (R02142) (R02141) (2140) SUBTOT;At O1JTE ROUTE 79 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ./RO W Realignment study & Right turn lanes (R09961) SUBTOTAL RO 1:TE ROUTE 86 PRO JECTS Avenue 58 to Avenue 66 (Segme nt 2) Avenue 66 to Avenue 82 (Segment 3) * (Caltrans Funded Projects SUB1OtAf?11 R 0 60 •` . . . ROUTE 91 PRO JECTS Soundwall design, ROW and construction (R09101,9337,9847,9861,9848,9832,9969,2043) (2058) (2144) (2136) Van Buren Blvd. Frwy Hook Ramp (R09535) Sndwall landscaping (R09933,9946,9945,2059) sU itatAI, RQ t ROUTE 111 PROJECTS (R09219, 9227,9234,9523,9525,9530,9537,9538) 9540,.96359743,9849-98519857,9629 00004 RoutE 11 t RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAIC PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE CO MMISSION AUTHORIZED ALLOCATION $3,029,862 $12,544,652 644842 $860,000 5680;®00 $20,253,000 $33,860,000 4;11 3,- $11,902,100 $2,300,000 $1,603,450 0;605;35D $16,946,856 6,656: CONTRACTURAL C OMMITMENTS TO DATE $3,009,862 $3,009,862. $12,544,652 $12544;652 $781,818 ?81,518 $19,500,000 $33,760,000 3:360;000 [; $10,374,324 $2,300,000 $998,300 *4,00 $16,946,856 $16;9a6;8st1 Page 1 of 3 % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED ALL OCATION 10/31/01 99 .3% 99.3 % 100.0% 100 .0% 90.9% 01% 96.3% 99 .7 % 87.2% 100 .0% 62.3% ;36:5°% 100. 0% O13. 0!f"o $67,838 $67;835 $529,605 ;605. $92,450 92;4x0 Project Complete $0 $I $20,158 $12,234 $35,084 $15,394 % EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST TO DATE CO MMITMNTS TO DATE $748,353 $748;353 $5,479,126 65,479,126 $353,337 $353;337 $18,060,000 $30,983,253 $8,814,426 $1,797,708 $769,863 10$1697 $11,020,331 11,090;331;: 24 .9% 24 43 .7% 43.7% 45 .2% LZ% 92.6% 91 .8% 85 .0 % 78.2% 77.1% 65:2% 65.0% 650% • RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE CD PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1-215 PROJECTS Preliminary Engrg/Environ. (R09008, 9018) SUtOtAl=21 INTERCHANGE IMPROV. PROGRAM Yuma IC Landscaping (R09926,9946) SUREOt:At INtERCHANC PRO JECT & CONSTR. MGMT SERV. (RO 2100) SUBTOTA1 BECHI PROGRAM PLAN & SERVICES North/South Corridor study (R09936) SUBTOTAL PROGRAM pl S7 PARK-N-RIDEIINCENT. PROGRAM (R0 9859) (2101-2117) (9813) (2146) (9917) SGBTOtA PARK4N RI CO MMUTER RAIL Studies/Engineering (RO 9420,9731,9832,9833,9844,9854,9956,2028) R02031,2027,2120,2029,9937,2128, 3800,3804) Station/Site Acq/OP Costs/M aint. Costs (0000,2026,2056,9929,9845,9953,9957,9932,9972) 000. 44i011111iAt11 ItAll `': COMMISSION CONTRACTURAL % CO MMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES AUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 10/31/01 TO DATE COM MITMNTS TO DATE $6,726,504 $6t26,504 $440,000 a00i0 $2,300,000 $25,000 5,000; $2,100,814 00081* $4,318,070 $13,190,402 pit soyr +J2 4.00110 $5,878,173 35;878;113 $400,000 $2,223,816 2;2 ;818:: $25,000 $2,100,814 $210`0;814 $3,925,518 $13,190,402 Page 2 of 3 87 .4% 90.9% a$ a 96.7% 96:7% 100 .0% 100.0% 000% 90.9 % 100.0% 0:. $0 0. $113,135 $113;':133; $0 $292,604 202,504:.: $44,350 $74,342 511:8`•693: 251;800 $5,704,897 x104;397; $312,519 $366,390 6$,390 $0 $676,986 76,986 $2,737,110 $11,875,959 04,0000 Q80 99101,258 97.1% i.1'1 °Lo 78.1% ;78;1% 16 5% 18 S"! 0 .0% 04l 32.2% '2 2% 69 .7 % 90.0 % 85:4" • 40 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CITY OF CANYON LAKE Railroad Canyon Rd Improvements SiuBtOIAL CANYON LOAM:: CITY OF CORONA Smith, Maple & Linco ln Interchanges & Storm drainage structure SIJStOT4,:gTY OF GORONA CITY OF PERRIS Local streets & ro ad improvements CITY OF SAN JACINTO Local streets & road improvements CITY OF TEMECULA Local streets & road improvements CITY OF NORCO Yuma I/C & Lo cal streets and road Imprmts CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Local stree ts & road improvemen ts CITY OF HEM ET Local streets & roads improvements (1) RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY/LOC 1-REETS & ROADS PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY PROJECT EXPENDITURE FOR TOTAL OUTSTANDING % L OAN BALANCE APPROVED MONTH ENDED MEASURE "A" LOAN OUTSTANDING TO -DATE AGAINST COMMITMENT 10/31/01 ADVANCES BALANCE COMMITMENT APPROVED COMMIT . $1,600,000 0,000 $5,212,623 $1,936,419 $1,324,500 $5,094,027 $2,139,067 $1,500,000 $730,000 so so $o $1,600,000 $5,212,623 $5;2#2;823 $1,936,419 $1,324,500 $5,094,027 $2,139,067 $1,500,000 $730,000 NOTE: (1) Loa n against interchange improvement programs. All values are for total Project/Contract and not related to fiscal ye ar budgets. $1,064,462 St,O64,402 $3,275,594 $3 275,594 $1,346,624 $921,083 $3,542,486 $1,487,550 $1,187,256 $186,960 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Page 3 of 3 66 .5 % S9 50A 62.8% 69.5% 69.5% 69.5 % 69.5% 79 .2% 25.6% 61.9% Status as of. 10/31/01 • • AGENDA ITEPf5B • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISS/ON DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Commission approval to: 1) Receive and file the Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2001; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law and Commission policy. The County's Investment Report for the month ending September 30, 2001 is also attached for review. Attachments 000005 410 Investm ent Poep ort Period Ending Septemb er 30, 2001 OPERA TING FUNDS • RATING PAR PURCH ASE MATURITY YIELD TO PURCHASE MARKET UNREALIZED M OODYS/S&P/FITCH VALUE DATE DATE MARKET PRICE VALUE GAIN (LOSS) Bank of America $40,014 AA1/AA- City Natio nal Bank $481.683 A3/BBB+ Cash with County Treasu rer $61,474,192 AAA- MR1/AAAf-S1/AAAV1+ Finan cial Inv esto rs Tru st (FIT) $5,341,648 AAA/AAA Agency/Treasu ry Securitie s: Fed Ho me Ln Ban ks Glo bal Note s Fed Ho me Ln Ban ks Discou nt Notes Sub -Total FUNDS HELD IN TRUST $3,916,643 AAA/AAA $3,845,000 09/06/01 09/15/03 4.16 % $3,916,643 $3,986,784 $70,141 81,961,200 AAA/AAA $2,000,000 06/14/99 07/15/03 6.29 % $1,961,200 $2,092,500 $131,300 $73,215,380 $5,845,000 Cash with Co unty: Local Transportatio n Fund $21,790,862 AAA-MR1/AAAf-S1/AAAV1+ Sub -To tal $21,790,862 INV ESTMENT WITH CITIES Principal Maturity Date % City of Heme t $248,610 01/01/02 6.5% City of Lake Elsinore $1,216,402 11/01/04 6.0% Sub -To tal $1,465,012 COMM ISSION BOND PROJECT FUNDS/DEBT RESERVE M ilestone Fun ds $9,472,065 AAA/AAA First American Treasury $46,231,537 AA A/AAA U.S. Treasury No tes $15,926,000 AAA/AAA First American Treasury - Held in Trust $2,163,948 AAA/AAA Su b -To tal $73,793,551 TOTAL 8170,264,804 $5,877,843 $6,079,284 $201,441 SU MMARIZED IN VESTMENT TYPE Ba nks Cash with County Mutual F unds: Financial Investors Trust $5,341,648 First American Treas ury - Trust $2,163,948 Milestone $9,472,065 Sub -Total Mutual Funds Federal Agency Notes U.S. Tr easury N otes Investment Agreem ents $521,697 $83,265,054 $16,977,661 $5,877,843 $62,157,537 $1,465,012 TOTAL 8170,264,804 • • Statement of Compliance All of the above investments and any investment decisions made for the quarter ending September 30, 2001 were in full compliance with the Comnussion's investment policy as adopted on April 11, 2001. The Commission has ade uate cash flows for six mo of operations. Signed by Chief Financial • ficer 000007 County of Riverside Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund Compliance Analysis and Investment Report September 30, 2001 Paul McDonnell - Treasurer/Tax Collector Kenneth C. Kirin - Assistant Treasurer Donald R. Kent - Chief Deputy Treasurer Treasurer's Commentary "September 11, 2001..." How different our world has become in just a matter of weeks. September 11th is a date that will be remembered as an event that will change life in America for many years to come. Since our last report, we continue to watch events unfold and evaluate the massive impact the attack has had on our financial markets. The result has been a large sell off and partial rebound in stocks and a flight to quality in U.S. Treasuries. At this juncture, we are approaching lows in interest rates that we have not seen in nearly 40 years. The confluence of events has further deteriorated an already weak U.S. economy with substantial job cuts (particularly in the airline industry) impacting everything from consumer confidence, travel and tourism. The risks of global recession are now becoming reality with market watchers forecasting worldwide GDP growth below that of its 25 year norm. On a brighter note, the U.S. economy is widely forecast to enter a recovery sometime in 2002. Another highly anticipated FED move to cut rates came on September 17th, the first trading day in equities after the attacks. This now brings the total to eight cuts totaling 350 bps. through the end of September. At this juncture, we continue to see a proactive Federal Reserve exercising its power of monetary policy, as well as the potential stimulus package coming from the White House and Congress. It is now likely that we will see a reversal of budget surpluses, and the associated buybacks of U.S. Treasury 0t ecurities, which, over the longer term, should put upward pressure on rates. month's end, the Fed Funds rate 3.00% was (down 50 bps.), the 2 -year T -Note was yielding 2.85% (down 78 bps.), while the 30 year T -Bond was 5.42% (up 5 bps.). For September, the Pool experienced a 37 bps. decrease in the average monthly yield as the effect of FED rate cuts continues to weigh on the market. -ikc. flwr tRe Paul McDonnell Treasurer -Tax Collector i Month -End Book Value Month -End Market Value* Paper Gain or (Loss) Percent of Paper Gain or Loss Yield Based Upon Book Value" Weighted Average Maturity (Years) Effective Duration Market value does not include accrued interest. Beginning in April, the reposed yield will be based upon the monthly average to more accurately reflect the portfolio's performance relative to the Benchmark. All figures have been re -stated to reflect this change in yield. PORTFOLIO STATISTICS SEPTEMBER AUGUST JULY $ 1,761,324,867 $ 1,774,159,038 $1,814,994,829 $ 1,764,560,987 $ 1,776,660,741 $1,817,932,265 $ 3,236,120 $ 2,501,703 $ 2,937,436 0.18% 0.14% 0.16% 3.71% 4.08% 4.18% 0.37 0.43 0.51 0.13 0.15 0.16 JUNE $1,877,915,421 $1,880,062,424 $ 2,147,003 0.11% 4.42% 0.50 0.21 MAY $1,950,957,654 $1,953,730,218 $ 2,772,564 0.14% 4.76% 0.59 0.24 • THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED INVESTMENT FUND IS CURRENTLY RATE. AAA/MR1 BY MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICES AAAN1+ BY FITCH IBCA County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 4th Floor - Capital Markets Riverside, CA 92502-2205 www.countytreasurer.org (909) 955 - 3908 000008 APRIL $ 2,179,261,478 $ 2,181,925,584 $ 2,664,106 0.12% 5.17% 0.62 0.23 IDE at � � 1 4 OCT 2007 SAG Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund - Portfolio Characteristics September 30, 2001 Maturity 30 Days or Less 30 - 90 Days 90 Days - 1 Year 1 - 2 Years 2-3 Years Over 3 Years Total: Market Value 1,133,508,822.22 357,265,209.90 •20,589,252.50 50,093,604.65 202,104,097.50 1,000,000.00 S1,764,560,986.77 10.00% 00.00% W00% 40.00% 3000% »OD% 1000% 84.24% Maturity 20.25% 1.17% 2.84% 11.45% 0.03% 00o% 30 OsYe v Las 30 - II0 Days 00 DM -1 Year 1- 2 Yesn 2 - 3 Then Our 3 Yens uality U.S. Treasury Federal Agency AAA A-1 and/or P-1 N/R Total: Market Value 253,202.50 872,698,695.38 110,989,150.00 774,496,338.89 • 6.123.600.00 •• 1,764,560,986.77 Quality A-1 and/or P-1 43.89% 6.29% N/R Federal Agency 49.48% Sector U.S. Treasury Federal Agency Cash Equiv. & MMF's Commercial Paper Medium Term Notes Negotiable CD's Bankers Acceptances Local Agency Obligations Total: • Includes Repos '• Collateralized Tune Deposits & Local Agency Obligations Market Value 253,202.50 872,698,695.38 603,200,000.00 239,267,116.67 5,089,150.00 25,000,000.00 12,929,222.22 6.123,600.00 S1,764,560,986.77 Sector Medium Term Notes 0.29% Commercial Paper 13.5e% Cash Egun. i MMF's 34.18% Local Agency Oblroabon• 0.35% U.S. Treasury 001% Federal A9•ncy 49 48% U.S. Treasury Yield Curve - September 2001 6.00'/0 5.50% 5.00% -1 4.50% 4 00'/, Y 3.50% 3.00% - 2.50% 4 2.00% 3M 6M IY 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y IOY 15Y 20Y 30Y + 09/01/01 -t- 09/30/01 1.25% 1 1 00'/e 0 75% 0.50% 0.25% 0.00% -0.25% -0.50'/0 -075% -1.00% -1.25% Yield Change ME 3M 6M. IY 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y I5Y 20Y 30Y Yield Curve Data 09/01/01 09/30/01 Change 3 Month 3.36% 2.37% -1.00% 6 Month 3.29% 2.35% -0.94% 1 Year 3.27% 2.48% -0.79% 2 Year 3.63% 2.85% -0.78% 3 Year 4.00% 3.37% -0.63% 5 Year 4.38% 3.80% -0.58% 7 Year 4.73% 4.41% -0.32% 10 Year 4.83% 4.59% -0.24% 15Year 5.41% 5.31% -0.10% 20 Year 5.46% 5.47% 0.01% 30 Year 5.37% 5.42% 0.05% II 000009 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND TREASURER'S POLICY • The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is governed by both State Law and County Policy. The County Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy is more restrictive than the California Government Code. This policy is reviewed annually by the County's Investment Oversight Committee and approved by the County Board of Supervisors. As of this month end, the County Treasure Pooled Investment Fund was in compliance with this more restrictive policy. Although we have been diligent in the prepartion of this report, we have relied upon numerous pricing and analytical sources including Bloomberg Market Database and Capital Management Sciences, Inc. Bond Logistix LLC BONDL0GIST' XLLC ,..wov.r Ion 213.612.2200 SUMMARY OF AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS California Government Code County Investment Policy Cal Govt Investment Category Maximum Authorized % glagt Code Maturity Actual Maximum Authorized % Quality Riverside Limit S&P/MoodVs Maturity Limit S&P/Moodv's/Fitch Portfolio % 53601(a) LOCAL AGY BONDS 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 15% / S150mm A/A2/A 0.000% 53601(b) U S. TREASURY 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 100% N/A 0 01% 53601(d) CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY DEBT 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 2.5% Investment Grade 0.35% 53601(e) FEDERAL AGENCIES 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 100% N/A 49.46% 53601(1) BILLS OF EXCHANGE 270 DAYS 40%' 180 DAYS 30% A1/P1/F1 0.73% 53601(q) COMM PAPER 160 DAYS 40% A1/P1 180 DAYS 40% Al/P1/F1 13.56% 53601(h) CERTIFICATE & TIME DEPOSITS 5YEARS 30% 1 YEAR 25%max A1/P1/F1 1.42% 53601(1) REPOS 1 YEAR NO LIMIT 31 DAYS 30%/15% term max A1/P1/F1 28.18% 53601(i) REVERSE REPOS 92 DAYS 20% 60 DAYS 10% max N/A 0.00% 53601(1) MED. TERM NOTES 5 YEARS 30% A 2 YEARS 20% max AA/Aa2/AA 0.29% 53601(k) MUTUAL FUNDS 90 DAYS 2 20% AAA/Aaa 3 IMMEDIATE 20% / $200mm AAA by 2 of 3 Rating Agencies 6.00% 53601(m) SECURED DEPOSITS (BANK DEPOSITS) 5 YEARS NO LIMIT 1 YEAR 2% max 0.00% 53601(n) MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH SECURITY 5 YEARS 20% AA -SECURITY A. ISSUER N/A N/A 0.00% 16429 (1,2,3) LOCAL. AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS N/A NO LIMIT 3 YEARS 0% max 0.00% o more than 30% of this category may be invested with any one commercial bank ' Mutual Funds maturity may be interpreted as weighted average matunty not exceeding 90 days. Or must have an Investment Advisor with not less tnan 5 years experience and with assets under management of S500,000.000. 100 00% • 000010 September 30, 2001 PROJECTION OF FUTURE CASH FLOW The Pooled Investment Fund cash flow requirements are baud upon a 12 month historical cash flow model. The Treasurer states that based upon projected cash receipts and matunng investments there are sufficient funds to meet future cash flow disbursement requirements over the next 12 months MONTH MONTHLY - MONTHLY REQUIRED ACTUAL INV. AVAIL. TO RECEIPTS DISBMNTS DIFFERENCE MAT. INVEST BALANCE MATURITIES INVEST >1 YR 10/01 42.2 10/2001 395.3 468.5 -73.2 31.0 0.0 1289.3 11/2001 418.7 436.3 -17.6 17.6 0.0 116.7 12/2001 781.2 489.5 291.7 0.0 291.7 84.7 01/2002 411.2 632.5 -221.3 0.0 70.4 7.2 02/2002 509.9 480.2 29.7 0.0 100.1 10.0 03/2002 414.2 433.1 -18.9 0.0 81.2 5.0 04/2002 852.4 514.2 338.2 0.0 419.4 0.0 05/2002 442.5 699.1 -256.6 0.0 162.8 0.0 06/2002 385.7 477.6 -91.9 0.0 70.9 5.0 07/2002 360.8 430.6 -69.8 0.0 1.1 0.0 08/2002 449.6 470.2 -20.6 19.5 0.0 0.0 09/2002 440.5 413.4 27.1 0.0 27.1 0.0 Totals: 5,862.0 5945.2 -83.2 68.10 1517.9 1692.9 3.87% 86.20% 96.13% 24 Month Gross Yield Trends The yield history represents gross yields; administrative costs have not been deducted. Actual eamings on fund balances will be credited by the Auditor - Controller based upon County Treasurer calculations. Portfolio yield generally lags current trends in short-term interest rates. Yields fluctuate with changing markets and past performance is not an indication of future results. • provider of independent analyses and information to the financial services industry. with a particular area of focus in money market mutual funds. The All -Taxable Index tracks the yield of over 500 taxable money market funds across several categories, i.e. Treasury, Government. and Prime, and reports the average yield of those funds on a monthly basis. For more information on the iMoneyNet, Inc. Index see www.ibcdate.conVindex.html Gross Yield Trends 6.75 6.25 5.75 5.25 4.75 4.25 3.75 3.25 Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep - 99 99 99 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 t PORTFOLIO YIELD -6-ALL TAXABLE AVERAGE 24 Month Yield Spread (Pool Yield vs. All Taxable Average) 0.30 0.20 0.10 Average Spread = -7.2 BP 0.00 -0.10 -0.20 -0.30 -0.40 -0.50 Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep - 99 99 99 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 • 000011 September 30, 2001 CUSIP Psrf$ vemment Agency Issuer Acquisition Current Current Market' Caution Mat= Sr4l1 Pries value w/o R&M' kt Gainlloss YW Mat 1 ER• Dur• 2 Ave. Liss 3 3 1LAV 10.000.000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.500 10/0101 10.000,000.00 100.000 1 o.000.000.ao 3.500 0.01 0.00 31331LAV 20.000.000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.500 1001/01 20,000,000.00 100.000 20.000.000.00 3.500 0.01 0.00 313397ML 40.000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DN 0.000 1002/01 39,814.888.89 99.537 39,814.888.89 - 3407 0.01 0.01 313589/AL 50.000.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 0.000 100201 49,705.833.33 99.412 49.705.633.33 3.601 0.01 0.01 313589447 25.000.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 0.000 1039/01 24.972.222.22 99889 24 972222.22 2.002 0.03 0.02 31338514W 30,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SKS DN 0.000 10/12/01 29,922.300.00 99.741 29.922,300.00 3.339 0.04 0.03 31358908 50.000.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 0ISC N 0.000 10/1701 49898.886.89 99.798 49.898.888,89 2.605 0.05 0.06 313589NC 50.000.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC N 0.000 1011801 49.920,277.78 99.841 49920,277.78 - 2.053 0.05 0.05 3133M5YA 10,000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS 5.000 1023/01 19000,000.00 100.156 10.015,600.00 15,600.00 2.691 0.07 0.0e 313385NK 50.000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS DN 0.000 10/2501 49896.083.33 99.792 49.896.083.33 2.565 0.07 0.07 313589NL 50.000.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 014 0.000 10/26/01 49.866.388.89 99733 49,868.388.89 2.807 0.07 0.07 313589NR 50.000.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DN 0.000 1013101 49,884,500.00 99.769 49.864,500.00 2.526 0.09 0.08 31331LAX 40,000,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.520 110101 40.000.000.00 100.000 40,000,000.00 3.500 0.09 0.09 313589PN 41.870,000.00 FEDERAL. NATL MTG ASSN DN 0.000 112101 41.724,559.90 99.653' 41,724.559.90 2.091 0.15 0.14 31364GHV 10,000.000.02 FEDERAL Nn1 L 14T0 ASSN ism 5.270 1113001 10,000.000.00. 10O.3bi 10.038.900.00 38.900.00 2949 0.17 0.17 31331L8A 35.000.000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.350 12/0301 35.000.000.00 100.000 35.00.000.00 3.350 0.17 0.18 31339707 50,000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 014 0.000 122001 49.717,250.00 89.435 49,717.250.00 2.353 023 0.22 313314/2 5,000.000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BANKS 6.625 02/0102 4,979,000.00 101.375 5.068,750.00 89,750.00 2.539 0.34 0.34 3133M7HC 5.000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 8KS 5.240 02/11/02 5.000.000.00 101.000 5,060.000.00 50.000.00 2491 0.37 0.37 3133M8YW 5.00,000.00 FEDERAL HOME 1.1413K5 6.035 06/2102 5,000,000.00 102563 5,128.150.00 128,150.00 2.467 0.71 0.72 31364KZX 5.000,000.00 FEDERAL NAT! MTG ASSN 6.500 120402 5,000.000.00 100.689 5,034,400.00 34.400.00 5.880 0.18 1.18 3133MCKP 2.265.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS 6.500 12/1102 2,265.000.00 100.781 2.262,60965 17.689.65 5.809 0.20 1.20 3133M054, 7,000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 8KS 4.450 0124003 7,000,000.00 100.125 7,006,750.00 8,750.00 4.347 0.07 1.32 313tar,F5 5.000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN 805 4.280 0206/03 5.000,000.00 100.188 5.09,400.00 9,400.00 4.133 0.11 1.35 3133MFTZ 25.000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME 114 BKS 4.410 07/10.03 25,000,000.00 101.500 2.375,000.00 375,000.00 3.532 0.79 1.78 3133MBWN 250.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK5 7.050 06/1403 250,000.00 103.908 259,765.00 9,765.00 4.844 0.86 1.87 31354KZ 1 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 6.550 112103 5,000.000.00 104.406 5.220,300.00 220.300.00 4.374 1.10 2.14 31364KZM 6.750.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 6.550 112103 6,750.000.00 104.406 7,047,403.00 297.406.00 4.374 1.10 2.14 31364KZV 20.000.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 6.750 1203103 20.000,000.00 100.719 29143,800.00 143.800.00 6.386 0.16 2.18 31364KA8 7,500.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MT0 ASSN 6.625 12/11/03 7,500.000.00 100.813 7.860,976.00 60,975.00 6.218 0.20 2.70 31364088 15,500.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL 1470 ASSN 6.510 12/1203 15.509000.00 100.781 15,621.066.00 121,055.00 8.120 0.21 2.20 3133MCPM 8.990.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK5 8.200 122633 0.990,000.00 100.875 9,060.66280 78.662.50 5.773 024 224 3136414F6 10,000.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 6.125 122603 10.000.000.00 100.844 10,084.400.00 84,400.00 5.714 0.24 2.24 31364K4R 10.000.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 5.460 0311204 10.000,000.00 101.313 10.131,300.00 131,300.00 4.886 0.45 2.45 31364K5A 30.000.000.00 FEDERAL. NATL MTG ASSN 5.375 03/1504 30.00.000.00 101.313 39393,900.00 393,900.00 4.803 0.48 2.46 15.000.000.00 FEDERAL. NAIL MTG ASSN 5.400 03/26104 15.000.000.00 100.000 15,000,000.00 5.400 1.06 2.49 11.000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 5.400 03/2604 11,000.000.00 00 100.000 11.000. 0.00 8.400 1.06 2.49 OAF 10.000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MT0 ASSN 5.250 0/26/04 10,000,000.00 101.344 19134,400.00 134,400 00 4.673 0.49 2.49 �OLE 10.000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 5250 052104 10.000.000.00 101.781 10,178,100.00 178.100.00 4.526 0.83 2.64 31292304 15,000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 5.210 052404 15.000,000.00 101277 15,191,660.00 191,550.00 4.690 0.79 265 3136FORP 25.000.000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 5.000 0709104 500000000 101.313 25.326250.00 300250.OQ 4.911 CLIA Z.ZQ Sub -TOW 871,125,000.00 889,567,193.23 672.890.606.38 3,141,50215 3.411 0.22 0.70 Cash Equivalent & Money Market Funds REPO 247.300,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH & CO INC 0.000 10/0101 247.300,000.00 100.000 247,300.000.00 3.200 0.01 0.00 REPO 250.000.000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN 3.200 10.0101 259000.00.00 100.000 250,000,000.00 3.200 0.01 0.00 AIM GAP 105,900.000 OQ AIM GOVT & AGENCY PORTFOLIO 0.000 1013101 105.600.000.0Q 100.000 106900 000 y3. 2.2122 Q. i .22 Sub -Total 803.200,000.00 603,200,000.00 603.200.000.00 3.200 0.02 0.02 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 25000.000.0Q CmBANK 0.000 1121/01 25000.000.3.0 100.000 25.000-000,00 ZAA12 211 Q,j 25.000.000.00 25,000,000.00 25.000.000.00 3.440 0.14 0.14 Bankers Acceptance 13 000 000.00 BANK ONE CORP 0.000 100401 12 929 222 n 99.458 17 22970 2/ 1132 2.21 241 Sub-Totai 13.000.000.00 12.929=2. 12929.22222 3519 0.01 0.01 Medium Term Notes 36962GUP 5 000 000,00 GENT ELEC CAP CORP MTN 7.000 030102 4.998.760.00 101.783 5 0219150.00 90400.00 j,jil 242 242 Sub -TOW 5.000.000.00 4,996750.00 5,089,160.00 90,400.00 2.741 0.42 0.42 Continued on /wens Mac Peps 1 000012 September 30, 2001 CUSIP Par111 Commercial Paper 3022X2X1 50.000.000.00 92344EX3 40,000,000.00 71706EX5 50,000,000.00 53943RX9 50.000.000.00 1730E0XG 50.000 000.09 Sub -Total Issuer EXXON PROJ INVMT COR VERIZON NETWORK FDG PFIZER INC LLOYDS BANK PLC CmCORP Acqu sltlon Current Current Market' Couoon MAIM l Sr2i1 EMI Y1099 w'o Accr 101. GalnlLo.i. =Mail 1 ER• Dur. 2 0.000 10/01/01 0.000 100301 0.000 10/05+01 0.000 1009101 0.000 10//6101 240,000,000.00 Average weighted days for commercial paper • 7.0 Local Agency Obligations' V&6 5,123,600.00 EDA BAN VIUI 1,000,000.00 MARCH JPRA GAN Sub -Tout 6,123,600.00 U.S. Treasury 9128275X 250,000.00 UNITED STATES TREAS NTS Sub -Tout 250,000.00 Grand -Touts 1,763,698,600.00 5.030 060003 0.000 06001/06 49.906.000.00 39,661,200.00 49,655,416.67 49.836.611.11 19606.886.69 239,267,116.67 5,123,600.00 1,000,000.00 6,123,600.00 99.610 99.653 99.711 99.673 99.816 100.000 100.000 6.375 o1Id102 248,964.38 101.261 248,964.38 1,761,324,668.50 49.905.000.00 39.861200.00 49,655,416.67 49,836,611.11 49.606.666.69 239,267,116.67 5,123,800.00 1,000,000.00 6,123,600.00 253.202.500 253,202.50 1,764,560,988.77 The mancet value and oriel of short -loin mon.y market unwraps are besot on purchase pica. 2 Effective Duration a a saphetinted calculation 81M measures price ssnsavrty, *tile Wong rib consideration Me poaubity of seoub0u being called betore maaa*y. 3 Average Life is one number 01 yews until principal b retianed M meanly, weighted by market value. Local Agency OWpabons nave vanabls rate coupons, spread to tin Pool 3.427 0.01 0.00 3.473 0.01 9.01 3.480 0.02 0.01 3.471 0.03 0.02 1152 ➢.�i QQ4 3.46 0.02 0.02 5.025 1.64 1.75 LEI 1 4.41 4.934 1.94 2.08 4,218.12 2.544 Q, 4216.12 2.544 0.34 0.34 3.236.120.27 3.350 0.13 0_36 Page 2 000013 Sponsor and Distributor • Monthly Master Account Statement September 30, 2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 3560 UNIVERSITY PLACE RIVERSIDE CA 92501 ACCOUNT 330072823-00 FINANCIAL INVESTORS TRUST U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET (AM) Fund Performance as of 9/30/01 SEC 7 DAY YIELD 2.82% 7 DAY EFFECTIVE YIELD 2.86% SUBACCOUNT MONTHLY REINVESTED MONTHLY BALANCE TOTAL CREDITS TOTAL DEBITS DIVIDENDS BALANCE OPENING ENDING U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET (AM) 00 RIVERSIDE CNTY TRANS COMMISSIC 5,330,231.64 •otal FIT Funds Investment 5,330,231.64 0.00 0.00 11,416.03 5,341,647.67 5,330,231.64 0.00 0.00 11,416.03 $5,341,647.67 0.00 0.00 11,416.03 $5,341,647.67 GE Investments The Investment Management Arm el GE Investment Advisor 00001/1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 3560 UNIVERSITY PLACE RIVERSIDE CA 92501 Account No.: 330072823-00 4 Account Statement September 30, 2001 HT, CALIFORNIA 370 17TH ST., STE. 3100 DENVER, CO 80202 Rep Name: FIT, CALIFORNIA Statement Period: 9/4/01 to 9/30/01 FINANCIAL INVESTORS TRUST • Fund Performance as of 9/30/01 U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET (AM) SEC 7 DAY YIELD 2.82% 7 DAY EFFECTIVE YIELD 2.86% Fund Summary U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET (AM) 330072823-00 RIVERSIDE CNTY TRANS COMMISSION PRICE PER SHARE SHARES OWNED MARKET VALUE el $1.00 5,341,647.670 $5,341,647.67 Total Market Value $5,341,647.67 Year to Date Earnings Summary DIVIDENDS CAPITAL GAINS TOTAL, U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET (AM) 330072823-00 E CNTY TRANS COMMISSION 64,827.84 $0.00 $164,827.84 Total Eamings $164,827.84 Transaction Summary FIT U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET FUND 330072823-00 RIVERSIDE CNTY TRANS COMMISSION TRADE DATE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION 9/4/01 Beginning Shares Balance EMU SHARES AMOUNT $1.00 5,330,231.640 $5,330,231.64 Ntttsl) S Mutual Funds Services Sponsor and Distributgt 00015 GE Investments • The Investment Management Arm of GE Investment Advisor Page 2 of 2 Account No.: 330072823-00 • FIT U.S. TREASURY MONEY MARKET FUND 330072823-00 RIVERSIDE CNTY TRANS COMMISSION FINANCIAL INVESTORS TRUST Transaction Summary TRADE DATE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION PRICE SHARES AMOUNT 9/28/01 Accrual Income Div Reinvestment $1.00 11,416.030 $11.416.03 Total Shares Owned 5,341,647.670 • N ttsp s Mutual Finds Services Sponsor and Distributor GE Investments The Investment Management Arm of GE Investment Advisor 000016 • AGENDA ITEI16 • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Expansion in Scope of Environmental Document to Clear the Measure "A" SR 79 Widening Project between Newport Road and Keller Avenue STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval of: 1) The concept that the environmental document will have to cover an expanded scope in order to deliver for construction the Measure "A" State Route 79 (SR 79) widening project between Newport Road and Keller Avenue (the Project); 2) Authorize staff to complete negotiations on acceptable scope of Environmental Document to permit the construction of the Measure Project with both the County of Riverside and Caltrans; 3) Bring back agreements to the Committee for final review and approval that provide a level of surety that the County of Riverside will assist in paying for both the increase in scope of the environmental document and for any construction outside the limits of the original Measure Project; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Measure "A" included a project on State Route 79 (SR 79) between the limits of old Newport Road and Keller Avenue near the new Diamond Valley Reservoir. RCTC funded the project by using 100% STIP funding. In 1992 RCTC completed a project report and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) clearance of the measure project. The construction of the project was delayed because of the downturn in Measure funding. The Commission later determined that the Project would be delivered with STIP funding. As a result of the source of funding, Caltrans is now responsible for delivering this Measure "A" project and a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental clearance will be required. Recently, Caltrans initiated the environmental process to determine what studies and limits would be acceptable. 000017 Project limits on the north have increased to Domenigoni Parkway as a result of the construction of the Diamond Valley Reservoir relocating Newport Road. In addition, both the County of Riverside and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have indicated that it will not be adequate to clear just the Measure "A" Project. FHWA has requested the limits of the project be extended to Hunter Road on the South to provide for a more logical terminus of the project. This location is where the County has already improved SR 79 to a six lane facility. The County of Riverside is now projecting significant growth in the area served by SR 79 and is requesting that the environmental document be expanded to address the widening of the road from the proposed four lane highway to a six lane highway. The current right of way would accommodate the Measure "A" Project for much of its length. Increasing the project to six lanes will increase the impacts of the project along its length from the environmental impact point of view and require significant right of way acquisition that would not otherwise have to occur to deliver the Measure Project. The increase in the environmental area of impact could significantly delay the delivery of the Measure Project so that additional environmental concerns can be studied, and concerns mitigated to the satisfaction of the appropriate stakeholders (US Fish & Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers, California Fish & Game, etc.). However, it is not likely that an environmental document that attempted to clear just the Measure Project could now be approved without the concurrence of both the County of Riverside and FHWA. This being the case, staff is recommending that RCTC seek additional funding support from the County of Riverside to compensate the Project for the additional costs of widening the project to six lanes and extending the limits to Hunter Road to meet County of Riverside improvements on SR 79. RCTC approved the 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program Discretionary Funding list of projects at the November 14, 2001 Commission meeting. Included in this list of projects, was $1,323,00 for the Route 79 Measure "A" project between Newport and Keller. This additional funding will cover the estimated increase in cost required to environmentally clear the additional portions of State Route 79. Any additional mitigation costs that will result from expanding the Measure Project are currently unknown. Based on discussions with the County of Riverside, the County would be responsible for any increase in mitigation that would be required to permit the larger highway project. Once the environmental document is approved, the construction projects could be staged such that the Measure Project proceeds, when funding permits, with the remaining portions of the environmentally cleared project following. Alternatively, if County financing is in place, the County of Riverside could pay for any additional construction that occurs coincident with the Measure Project that is outside of the four lane -widening project between Domenigoni and Keller. • • 000018 • • • Attached to this item are letters received from both Caltrans and the County of Riverside with their positions on this issue. Attachments 000019 • • , s TO: irstareWellMSION EP.U, DATE: _II/l�f, o r TIME: IM PAGES: 1 y FROM: +I LOCATION: O ROTC • FAX # ti - R / FAXi : yi n • 9�5-3�9R ,• • LOCAT/ON: MESSAGE. PHONE#: q56--(0740 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department November 13, 2001 Mr. Eric Haley Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, California 92501 Attention: Hideo Sugita RE: State Route 79, Winchester Road Dear Mr. Haley: David E. Barnhart Director of Tronspormrion 057370 AECEIVEL NUV 1 4 2001 s1t of 13Offc P I am writing this letter as a follow up to the Project Development Team meeting that occurred last week at Caltrans. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the scope of work for the SR 79 Measure A project. RCTC and Caltrans have initiated the preliminary engineering .and environmental work for the project. The project identified in Measure A proposes' to Widen SR 79 to four lanes from old Newport Road south to Keller Road. 'There have been significant changes that have transpired since the Measure A project was originally contemplated in 1988, causing the scope of the project to be reconsidered for study in the environmental document. The construction of Domenigoni Parkway, in conjunction with the Diamond Valley Reservoir, has replaced old Newport Road as the primary east -west arterial in the area. Domenigoni Parkway is located about 3A mile farther north than old Newport Road, causing the northerly project limits to be extended to Domenigoni Parkway. SR 79 south of Hunter into the City of Temecula has been constructed to its ultimate six -lane configuration. We believe that it only makes sense to extend the southern limits studied in the environmental document to Hunter Road. We suggest the new boundaries studied should include Domenigoni Parkway on the north and Hunter Road to the south to create logical termini. We understand that both FHWA and Caltrans support the suggested limits for inclusion in the environmental document. The other matter of concern has to do with the width of road that should be studied. While the Measure A project mentioned the need for four lanes, the growth projections show the need to widen SR 79 to six lanes the entire length. The County's current General Plan calls for the ultimate width of SR 79 to be six Llanes. This area of the /County isexperiencingsignificant growth, and the // 4080 Lemon Street, Bch Floor • Ri'aaide, California 92501 - (909) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 - Riverside, California 92 502-1 090 • FAX (909) 955-6721 000020 Eric Haley November 13, 2001 Page 2 indications are that growth will continue. The traffic projections being generated as part of the RCIP also support the need for six lanes. The traffic projections alone support the six -lane improvements. It makes sense to us from a timing standpoint to environmentally clear the full six lanes at this time. Caltrans has indicated that clearing six lanes up front will not add significantly to their study efforts. We realize the SR 79 Measure A project only anticipated the initial need for four lanes from Old Newport Road to Keller Road. However, we believe six lanes will be needed in the very near term from Domenigoni Parkway to Hunter Road. The County has put together a finance team that is looking at ways to fund the construction of the additional improvements, beyond those stated in Measure A. Our goal is to have the finances in place when the project is ready to go to construction. We look forward to working cooperatively with RCTC and Caltrans in an effort to bring these much needed transportation improvements to a reality quickly. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact my office. Sincerely, ‘.,zi avid E. Barnhart Director of Transportation DEB:GAJ cc: Supervisor Jim Venable Richard Lashbrook Safaa Bayati, Caltrans 000021 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA —BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 464 West Fourth Street, 6th Floor SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-6480 fiX(909) 383-6239 (916) 654-4086 • • November 14, 2001 Mr. Hideo D. Sugita Deputy Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Ave. Riverside, California 92501 Dear Mr. Sugita: Flex your power! Be energy efficient! This letter is to restate the conclusions reached at the November 8, 2001 Project Development Team meeting which you attended at the Caltrans District 8 Headquarters Building. At that meeting it was clear that changes in the original concept for SR 79 improvements, as approved by the voters in Measure 'A', must be amended due to changing conditions and regulatory requirements. First, the original termini of the project, from Newport to Keller Avenues cannot meet the "logical termini" requirements of FHWA. This would disallow use of any federal funds on the project to continue as originally planned. The appropriate termini of this project have been identified as extending from Hunter Rd., where the existing 4 -lane improvements from I-15 end, northward to Domenigoni Parkway, where it will eventually connect with the "Hemet Bypass" project. An additional $500,000 will be required to obtain environmental clearance of this additional segment of highway. Second, the Route Concept Report and the County's Master Plan of Streets identifies this segment of Rte 79 as a six -lane facility. To provide a satisfactory level of service for the 20 - year planning window, a six -lane facility will be required. Consequently, it is imperative that we plan and environmentally clear 6 -lane project for this route. Caltrans is in the position to provide all environmental studies, engineering and right-of- way acquisition services required for this project. We commit to full effort in this regard. Riverside County staff is recommending providing full funding for the difference in cost between the Measure 'A' project and the additional cost of constructing a 6 -lane facility and extending the improvements from Newport Rd south to Hunter Rd. The mechanism for payment is an "Improvement Benefit District" which is already in study. The issue will be before the Board shortly and is being fast -tracked. 000022 Mr. Hideo D. Sugita November 14, 2001 Page 2 If the County cannot obtain their share of the funding, the project as originally scoped, 4 - lanes from Keller Rd to Domenigoni Parkway, would be constructed. The other improvements would not be constructed until funding became available. • We hereby request that you bring to your Commission for action, a request that the Riverside County Transportation Commission support this arrangement, which would add previously Commission approved funds to the other funding that has been proposed for this project. This would allow a full 6 -lane project to be constructed to serve this area that would meet logical termini and future planning needs. If you need further information, please contact me at 383-6480. Sincerely, SAFAA BAYATI Project Manager District 8 Cc: GJohnson, Riverside County RDeming, District 6, Environmental GCohoe 000023 • "Caltrans improves mobility across California" • AGENDA ITEM7 • • • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Services Contract Agreement No. 02-31-917 with County of Riverside Real Property Services for SR -79 Realignment Project STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Enter into contract No. 02-31-917 for real property services with County of Riverside Facilities Management/Real Estate Division. The contract will be for labor to obtain property right -of -entry for an amount not to exceed $19,800 with a contingency amount of $2,000 for a total not to exceed value of $21,800; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the October 14, 1998 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved an amount of $425,000 from the SB45 2% planning funds to provide partial match for the $4.5 million of TEA21 Demonstration Project funding. This funding was designated to provide engineering and environmental clearance to realign State Route 79 near the Cities of Hemet and San Jacinto between Ramona Expressway and Domenigoni Parkway. The Cities of Hemet, San Jacinto and the County of Riverside all desire to proceed with the project at the earliest possible time. RCTC is the lead agency for this project. The realignment, over a distance of approximately 15 miles, is necessary to increase capacity, enhance operation, restrict access, and improve safety. The project will require right-of-way acquisition for the new alignment. The estimated total costs for the realignment ranges from $43.41 million to $84.51 million. The higher range estimate includes more grade -separated intersections with major arterial roadways. 000024 At the December 8, 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission approved an award of a preliminary engineering contract to CH2M Hill for $730,212. During the January 10, 2001 Commission meeting, additional funds were approved in order to proceed with the environmental investigations requested by the Resource Agencies in the amount of $109,450 and $40,000 of extra work for a total cost of $149,450. This additional work was necessary in order to determine which alternative alignments provided the least impact to the environmentally sensitive areas in the Hemet and San Jacinto area. As a result of the studies performed to - date and the consultations with the various stakeholders, a new set of alignments was developed to be carried forward. At this time, staff needs to proceed with additional environmental studies that need to be performed in order to determine the final alignment that will be carried forward through the Project Approval/Environmental Document phase of the project. However, the upcoming environmental studies will require temporary entry of parcels along and adjacent to the different realignments currently being studied. In the past, RCTC has contracted with the County of Riverside to obtain the right - of -entry necessary to complete the RCTC highway projects. Staff is recommending that a new agreement be entered into to allow the County to perform the necessary acquisition support services so that right -of -entry can be obtain in time to allow for the environmental investigations to move forward and on schedule. The proposed contract with the County of Riverside will include all necessary labor to obtain right -of -entry of all parcels necessary to perform environmental investigations along the project limits. The attached cost and scope of work for all right -of -entry services to be performed by the County of Riverside is for an amount not to exceed of $19,800 and a contingency amount of $2,000 for a total not -to - exceed value of $21,800. The agreement will be subject to RCTC legal counsel review. Attachment: County of Riverside Cost Estimate Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 2001/02 Amount: $21,800 Source of Funds: TEA 21 Demonstration Project Budget Adjustment: GLA No.: 222 31 81403 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11-15-01 000025 November 14, 2001 • i FACILITIES MANAGEMENT MICHAEL J. SYLVESTER DIRECTOR DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION REAL ESTATE MAINTENANCE CUSTODIAL Gustavo Quintero Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, California 92501 RE: highway 79 Project Dear Mr. (.iuintero: Pursuant ti..) my conversation with Bill Hughes and your subsequent telephone call, we submit the foliowirui proposal for acquiring rights of entry which are needed for the Highway 79 Project. 1. County of Riverside, Department of Facilities Management, Real Estate Division se) vices to acquire Rights of Entry for Biological Assessment Purposes. 15ri+ Total Owners (Right of Entry only) as defined in altak.:hment at 300 hours at $60 per hour $18,000 2. Contingency (10% ±) 1 800 faiirllilted Total Cost: $19,800 This estimate does not include any right of way services for the acquisition of permanent or temporary rights, rights -of -way costs, litigation guarantee costs, appraisal costs, relocation expenses, condemnation fees, costs of title policies or escrow fees. Should yoi i f lave any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (909) 955-9275. erx truly yours, J et M. l'Irks Superviinra Real Property Agent JMP js cc: Bill Hughes Davo Slaughter 3133 MISSION INN AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CA V2507 • (909) 955.4820 • FAX (909) 955-4837 000026 • MIDDLE • APN 11111 SE GMENT NUMBER AREA LAST NAME FIRST NAME NAME C/O 463090007 6S D .4 80929.578 ABATTI JOSEPH S 463090010 6S D.3 62644.488 ABATTI JOSEPH S 465190057 SR A .6 74253 .203 ALLEN BRUCE C/O THE PROVO GROUP 1 465190058 SR A.7 73769 .336 ALLEN BRUCE C/O THE PROVO GROUP 1 465060005 6S D .22 405015.563 AMERICAN MANTEIV CORP 465170007 3SR B.17 40802.090 AN CHEN CHEN 430110016 1NR H.31 91061.063 BAHAN JAMES N C/O PAUL BAHAN 430120013 1NR H.30 355529.906 BAHAN JAMES N C/O PAUL BAHAN 431130013 1NR H .4 89680 .688 BARTEL DALE R 431130025 1NR H.5 168002 .469 BARTEL DALE R 431130012 ETC G.29 79115.727 BARTEL DALE R 465020001 6S D.50 14814 .559 BIDONDO RAY MOND 465020002 6S D.51 11761 .645 BIDONDO RAYMOND 466050015 SR A. 3 464.508 BISSETT ELW OOD G 455110002 6S D.76 442549.531 BOERSMA SA M 455110003 6S D. 75 155647.406 BOERSMA SAM 465100013 MR E. 1 121076.938 B OERSMA FAR MS 465100018 MR E.2 117620.719 BOERSMA FARMS 465020023 6S D. 52 37421.336 BOOKER HENRY C 465040021 6S D.46 96245.734 BORBA DOLEEN 465250028 4SR C.24 10455.844 BROWN D ONALD P 455120062 6S D. 72 20707. 145 BUCHANAN R OBERT R 431020003 3NR 1.11 290550.469 BUENA VIDA FAR MS C/ O ROBERT E OSBORNE 431020004 3NR 1.8 413043. 375 BUENA VIDA FARMS C/O ROBERT E OSBORNE 431020016 3NR 1. 12 97925.258 BUENA VIDA FARMS 458242013 6S D.34 4063.738 BURDETT CHARLES R 465250025 4SR C.21 10219.938 BYARS JIM 465250023 4SR C. 19 10343.262 CANFIELD NORMAN R 431200004 ETC G.25 153623. 203 CHACON JOE M 431200005 ETC G.22 78776.164 CHACON JOE M 465170006 3SR B.16 36764.383 CHANG YOW MING EMI CIO CHIEN HAN LI 455130042 6S D. 61 37529.535 CHAUDHURI KALI P C/O KALI CHAUDHURI 465130016 3SR B.40 149684.125 CHEN LEO 465250024 4SR C.20 17343.516 CHING YVONNE L 465140014 3SR B. 37 49103.539 CHO H JOONG H 0 465140015 3SR B.38 52205.641 CHOH JOO NG H Q 465080005 6S D. 21 81069. 625 CHOI SIN JO 465130005 3SR B. 41 325514. 000 CHOW TSU SHOW C/O TSU SHOW CHOW ZV 465250029 4SR C. 22 10208.191 CHURCH LALA -.I 465020031 MR E.20 164069.813 CIMINO FRED E C/O CHARLES LESTER 465030020 MR E.19 138939. 906 CIM INO FRED E C/O CHARLES LESTER 465140032 3SR B. 34 90091. 656 CITY OF HEMET 1 of 16 APN SEGMENT NUMBER AREA LAST NAME MIDDLE FIRST NAME NAME CIO 455130044 465020032 O 465030021 O 465030027 O 431270014 iV 431270015 co 463170024 463170032 455130033 465030016 465100030 465100032 461200019 461210005 431100023 465260001 465270001 431110006 431110011 431110012 431130014 431020019 431020020 431140004 431130015 465100006 465100038 465110001 465110024 465040005 465170008 MR MR MR MR WRR WRR SR SR MR MR MR MR SR SR 1NR 6S 6S 1NR 1NR 1NR 1NR 3NR 3NR ETC 1NR 4SR 4SR 4SR 4SR 6S 3SR 465170012 3SR 463170031 3SR 463160014 SR 463160015 SR 463160016 SR 463160017 SR 463160018 SR 463160019 SR 431020009 1NR 431100001 1NR 465250039 4SR • E.27 E .21 E.18 E.17 F.20 F.16 A.27 A.29 E.32 E.10 E.5 E. 6 A.8 A. 5 H. 13 D. 16 D.14 H.8 H.6 H.7 H. 3 1. 13 1.10 G.26 H. 2 C. 35 C.34 C. 28 C.38 D.38 B.18 B. 24 B. 4 A. 19 A. 18 A.17 A. 16 A.15 A.14 H.17 H.16 C. 23 8418.063 1062.414 23827 .785 26702 .500 157870.922 198685 .141 15214 .465 2073.188 16712 .328 62390.629 20831 .891 96365.078 494188.406 442507 .125 45486.875 78421.313 80199. 836 76797. 094 80912. 156 87697. 844 83102. 125 328760. 625 328569.375 315808. 813 77288. 711 67689. 211 76489.297 99456.539 37223. 039 41247. 637 39504.313 40038.055 126895. 234 19346.734 11861. 195 7864.113 17776. 031 10146. 473 10177. 711 681800.375 69134. 945 11773.902 CITY OF HE MET CITY OF HEMET CITY OF HE MET CITY OF HE MET CITY OF HE MET CITY OF HE MET CONTINENTAL DEV CORP CONTINENTAL DEV CORP COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE C OUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CR OSSR OADS AT WINCHESTER CROSSROADS AT WINCHESTER CURRY CURTI CURTI DEJONG DEJONG DEJONG DEMLER DEMLER DEMLER DEVRIES DEVUYST DILWORTH DILWORTH DILWORTH DILWORTH DITTRICH DO BBS DOBBS DO MENIGONI DOMENIGONI DOM ENIGONI DO MENIGONI DOMENIGONI DOMENIGONI DO MENIGONI DUNCAN DUNCAN DUNKEL ROBERT A RUTH E RUTH E WILLIE WILLIE WILLIE JOHN E ED MUND EDMUND GARRETT D RICHARD C NELSON S NELSON S NELS ON S NELSON S FRANK A BETTY L LAWRENCE A ROBERT A MARIE ROBERT A MARIE RO BERT A ROBERT A ROBERT A KATHARINE R KATHARINE R Ask TERRY D 6 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDIN DEPART MENT OF BUILDIN DEPARTMENT OF BUILDIN DEPARTMENT OF BUILDIN C/O JOHN D HAAGSMA C/ O JOHN D HAAGSMA CIO LINDA M DEMLER CIO KEVIN DEMLER JAMES W DILW ORTH C/O JAMES DILWORTH C/O KATHRYN SCHMITT MARIE D OMENIGONI MARIE D OMENIGONI MARIE DOMENIGONI MARIE D OMENIGONI MARIE D OMENIGONI MARIE DO MENIGONI C/O SANWA BANK RE W 1 C/O SANWA BANK RE W 1 • APN• SEGM ENT NUMBER AREA 431110013 1NR 431120011 3NR 431120012 3NR 431130021 3NR 455130034 MR 465180016 SR 455120055 WRR 465030011 MR 465030013 MR 465030014 MR 465040016 6S 465170026 3SR 465110020 3SR 465110027 4SR 465110012 4SR 431130032 3NR 465040004 6S 441150006 ETC 465170025 3SR 431110005 1NR 430130016 1NR 430130047 1NR 430130048 1NR 430130043 3NR 441160003 ETC 465150005 4SR 465150013 4SR 465270008 4SR 430100007 3NR 455120013 WRR 455120051 6S 455140054 6S 455140061 6S 455140062 6S 458242014 6S 455130040 6S 455130043 6S 455110010 WRR 455110011 WRR 455110012 WRR 455110013 WRR 455110014 WRR • LAST NAME FIRST NAME NAME CIO MIDDLE H .11 353137.406 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 1 .4 84242 .320 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 1.7 86486.398 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 1 .3 82187.922 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST E .33 69 .781 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST A.9 278019 .563 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST F .1 7649 .281 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST E .8 60527 .285 EGGS WEST E.9 135325 .578 EG GS WEST E.15 79760 .180 EGGS WEST D.37 443564.844 EMERALD ACRES 6. 20 59332 .137 FLORES FLOREAM B. 42 162162.813 FN DEV CO ALPHA C.30 249255 .906 FN DEV CO ALPHA C. 39 136.207 FN PR OJECTS INC 1.1 97283.625 GABRYCH EUGENE D.39 39065. 039 GALLETA JOSEPH L G. 1 821509. 688 GARRETT PAUL B.14 40229.656 GATTI PRODUCTIONS INC H.9 79194.453 GLAVADANOVIC STEVEN H.21 20132.859 GOEDNART JENNIE H. 20 42783.078 GOEDNART JENNIE H. 22 98493.188 GOEDNART JENNIE 1.19 7104.008 GOEDNART JENNIE G.2 63485. 344 GRAVAGE JAMES A C. 1 416835. 250 GREAT PACIFIC DEV CORP C.2 46163.918 GREAT PACIFIC DEV CORP C.9 1343. 133 GREAT PACIFIC DEV CORP 1.17 319551. 875 GUZMAN INV DEV CO F.2 110705.242 HAH LTD D.66 39499. 617 HANICH DARLENE J D. 48 21278. 105 HEARTLAND MSK REALTY VENTURES D.47 29129.035 HEARTLAND MSK REALTY VENTURES D.49 9509. 766 HEARTLAND MSK REALTY VENTURES D.33 3829.590 HERNANDEZ HERIBERTO D. 59 33201. 969 HEXAGONAL PARTNERSHIP D. 60 116404. 266 HEXAGONAL PARTNERSHIP F.9 18505. 504 HIGGINS MILTON S F. 8 23211. 719 HIGGINS MILTON S F. 7 41297. 992 HIGGINS MILTON S F. 5 40985. 484 HIGGINS MILTON S F. 10 77428. 234 HIGGINS MILTON S C/ O LEONARD GROSS C/O LEONARD GROSS C/ O LEONARD GROSS C/O TAHITI GROUP C/O PACIFIC BAY HO MES C/O PARVIN ZABETIAN W C/ O JERRY KREITZ C/O GREAT PACIFIC DEV C/ O GREAT PACIFIC DEV C/O GREAT PACIFIC DEV C/O GIRDHARI PUROHIT C/O GIRDHARI PUROHIT • 3 of 16 APN SEGMENT NUMBER AREA LAST NAME MIDDLE FIRST NAME NAME CIO 455130021 455130022 465320013 431270018 431100022 455120063 431200011 431200012 431200016 431200018 431200020 455130023 455130024 465100010 465150002 465170028 463180027 463180021 465170032 465170033 465170034 465320018 465320017 465030024 455340010 465170003 465150014 465150015 455130002 430130034 430130018 MR MR 6S WRR 1NR 6S ETC WRR WRR WRR WRR MR MR MR 4SR 3SR 3SR SR 3SR 3SR 3SR 6S 6S MR 6S 3SR 6S 6S 6S 1NR 3NR 430130023 3NR 431020007 3NR 431120004 3NR 431120006 3NR 431130030 3NR 465150009 4SR 465110003 4SR 430130051 1NR 441160021 ETC 455120064 6S 465150007 4SR E .31 E.30 D.13 F .14 H.14 D .71 G .24 F.25 F.24 F.19 F.17 E. 29 E. 28 E.3 C. 5 B.19 B.5 A.26 B.25 B.26 B.22 D. 11 D.12 E.7 D.77 B. 11 D.10 D.9 D. 54 H.24 1. 21 1. 18 1. 16 1. 5 1. 6 1. 2 C.8 C.25 H. 27 G. 7 D.70 C. 6 19607.711 21790.629 17575.891 43925 .871 44255.445 19329.586 79676 .992 78184.289 80028.547 86477.680 101772 .250 21791 .320 24603 .121 10027 .934 12591.770 59250.285 22383. 051 29194.785 33246. 270 27404.160 19705. 590 9106.984 7999. 156 129597.695 20134.875 161693.219 51140. 266 23617.242 23062.363 21215.586 375305.781 269853.344 156287. 578 413966.469 323444. 531 336453. 875 41614. 672 122735.656 25075. 895 65336. 191 19306. 836 21243. 578 HOFFER HOFFER HOUK HOUK IPARAGUIRRE JONES JONGS MA JONGSMA JONGSMA JONGSMA JONGS MA KAELIN KAELIN KAELIN KEITH KENNEDY KING KING KNOX KNOX KNOX LEWIS LEWIS LIN LINDNER LIU LIU LIU LUTTRELL MARTIN M ARTIN MARTIN M ARTIN MATSON M ATSON MATSON MATTESON M AUDE M CCLEISH GROUP MCCRUMMEN MCGRATH MEZA KENNETH J KENNETH J JOANN STELLA JOANN JENNIE F W MARY NADINE MARY NADINE WILLIAM W MARY NADINE WILLIAM W THOMAS C C/O GRACE M. KAELIN THOMAS C C/O GRACE M. KAELIN THOMAS C CHARLES G CANDY THEODORE C THEODORE C CHARLES E CHARLES E CHARLES E ENRIQUETA C ROYCE H MAO NAN C/O N ORMAN HUNG MICHAEL J MENH HAU JI MMY Y JIMMY Y CAROLE ANN MR. C/O RUTH MARTIN (DECE MR. C/O RUTH MARTIN (DECE MR. C/O RUTH MARTIN (DECE RUTH A FRANCES FRANCES ROBERT 0 EDWIN H C/ O PATRICIA MATTES ON VERA E ZELDA ROBIN MANUEL 4.6 E D A C/O MICHAEL RECORD • APN • SE GMENT NUMBER AREA 465290016 6S 455130030 MR 455130046 MR 441020002 WRR 455110007 WRR 431030019 1NR 430130046 1NR 431110014 1NR 431130029 1NR 430130044 3NR 465140021 3SR 465140028 3SR 465110028 4SR 465030010 MR 466060035 SR 431140013 WRR 431200022 WRR 455110015 WRR 455120053 WRR 455130012 6S 430130040 1NR 465170014 3SR 465170024 3SR 441030007 ETC 441030003 ETC 441030008 ETC 441030009 ETC 455130006 6S 455130007 6S 465100022 3SR 465110021 3SR 458242021 6S 455340012 6S 465080001 6S 465080002 6S 465080003 6S 465080004 6S 431020013 3NR 441020004 ETC 441020005 ETC 441030005 ETC 441030006 ETC LAST NAME • FIRST NA ME NA ME C/O MIDDLE D .17 E.26 E .24 F .13 F.11 H.19 H .23 H.10 H.1 1.20 B.31 B.32 C.29 E. 16 A.1 F.22 F. 18 F. 6 F.3 D.63 H. 26 B. 13 B.15 G.12 G.9 G. 11 G. 10 D.57 D. 58 B. 44 B. 43 D.36 D.79 D. 26 D.25 D.24 D. 23 1. 9 G.15 G.16 G. 13 G. 14 35894.480 28932 .754 33220 .133 622903 .750 9001 .992 122623 .656 MITCHELL MLIKOTIN MLIKOTIN MONTGOMERY M ONTGOMERY M ORMINO 20046.180 MWD 54698 .016 MWD 124250.250 MWD 56878 .996 MWD 48607 .570 MWD 4740 .078 MWD 9385 .152 MWD 81410.281 MWD 821566.188 MWD 121143.570 MWD 69130. 109 MWD 177184.094 MWD 83682.234 MWD 19106.664 NAKATANI 48815.898 ODDO 75802.578 ONEEORMAN CO INC 42224. 355 ONEFORMAN CO INC 10418. 258 PACIFIC CENTURY HOMES 185622.031 PACIFIC CENTURY HOMES INC 78647.281 PACIFIC CENTURY HOMES INC 56276.566 PACIFIC CENTURY HOMES INC 39527. 449 PADILLA TONY 40665.266 PADILLA TONY 10904. 039 PAGE RANCH 155473.625 PAGE RANCH 3080. 711 PALLIES 18701. 098 PEARSO N 39680.719 PHAM 41568.426 PHAM 40483. 926 PHAM 40258. 828 PHAM 316030.219 165915. 922 163299. 969 81584. 844 68030.500 PINHEIRO FAMILY PLANTENGA PLANTENGA PLANTENG A PLANTENGA RICHARD STEVEN DAN DAN DAN DAN JACOBY JACOBY JACO BY JACO BY CHARLES E ALEX T ALEX T DANIEL DANIEL FRANK M NOBORU PAUL D C/O MARTIN WEINBERG C/O MARTIN WEINBERG MWD MWD MWD C/O FU LEE LI CHING C/O FU LEE LI CHING C/O NEIL D GASC ON R C/O CARLOS PADILLA R C/O CARLOS PADILLA ALLEN C Q Q Q Q • 5 of 16 APN SEG MENT NUMBER AREA MIDDLE L AST NA ME FIRST NAME NA ME CIO 465050016 465050017 465050018 465050019 O 465040018 C) 465040019 CD 465040020 463160020 1.,J 441150014 431100002 465040008 465040009 431020008 455120066 455120067 465040010 465140001 465140002 465140004 465140024 465150008 463170030 465100024 465100031 465140033 465110014 465110019 465110031 465110032 465150018 465150020 6S 6S 6S 6S 6S 6S 6S SR ETC 1NR 6S 6S 1NR 6S 6S 6S 3SR 3SR 3SR 3SR 4SR 3SR 3SR 3SR 3SR 4SR 4SR 4SR 4SR 4SR 4SR 465250037 4SR 465250038 4SR 465270007 4SR 465270009 4SR 463090012 6S 465150019 6S 463170029 SR 463180020 SR 463180022 SR 465180006 SR 465100035 3SR D .27 D .29 D.30 D .31 D.40 D.41 D .42 A.13 G.4 H.15 D.43 D. 44 H.18 D. 73 D. 69 D. 45 B.29 B. 27 B. 28 B.30 C.7 B.3 B.46 B. 45 B.33 C.31 C. 37 C.26 C.32 C.4 C.3 C. 14 C. 15 C. 10 C. 11 D.2 D.7 A. 28 A. 25 A. 21 A. 11 B. 47 82174 .703 81548.328 81145.453 81329.578 53261.074 62106.656 65688 .031 17544.980 388611 .969 120961.234 39294.043 40213.555 426350.813 18721.551 19059.500 40487.883 130911. 172 5419. 586 36169.918 44165. 008 25659.727 14724.465 3395.961 9239.801 10706.406 6709.395 3488. 988 4200.680 4990.316 3410.707 13544. 688 8382.172 16632.832 1792.281 1393.305 19996. 250 61025. 949 6449.371 12380.648 10681. 805 120016. 063 6360. 938 PLATT PLATT PLATT PLATT PLUEGER PLUEGER PLUEGER POKORNY R J OHNS ON PROP RANCHO KASANKA RAST OGI RASTOGI RECORD REED REED RHEINGANS RICKETTS RICKETTS RICKETTS RICKETTS RIETKERK GERTRUDE GERTRUDE GERTRUDE GERTRUDE DONALD DONALD DONALD BESSIE ANIL ANIL RANDOLPH BETTY PAUL DAVID LINDA ARTHUR ARTHUR ARTHUR TONY RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLO OD C ONT RIVERSIDE CO UNTY FLO OD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO D CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO D CO NT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO D CO NT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO D CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO D CO NT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO D CONT RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAN ORTATION COMMISSIO N H H H H N N N L CI O J S YEAGER A 0/0 CLAYTON RECORD J C W S G G G RIVERSIDE C OUNTY FLOO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOG RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOG RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLO G RIVERSIDE C OUNTY FLO O RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLO G RIVERSIDE C OUNTY FLO G RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOO • eon • APN • SE GMENT NU MBER AREA 465100034 4SR 465110029 4SR 465110030 4SR 465250036 4SR 465270006 4SR 463040017 6S 465150017 6S 455130011 •6S 430130052 1NR 465170009 3SR 455120008 6S 455120009 6S 463170028 3SR 465170001 3SR 465170002 3SR 465250022 4SR 441160002 ETC 441160004 ETC 455120052 6S 430110015 1NR 430120012 1NR 465080012 6S 465080013 6S 465080014 6S 465250020 4SR 441160007 ETC 431270017 WRR 431100024 1NR 465170027 3SR 465290009 6S 465170029 3SR 463040020 6S 463180007 3SR 463180025 3SR C) 463180026 3SR O 463180015 SR O 463180018 SR 463180019 SR W 463180023 SR W 458242015 6S 431200003 ETC 455130004 6S LAST NA ME • MIDDLE FIRST NAME NAME CIO C.36 C.27 C.33 C .13 C.12 D .5 D .8 D .64 H .28 B.21 D.68 D.67 B.2 B.9 B.10 C.18 G. 6 G. 3 D. 65 H. 32 H. 29 D. 20 D.18 D. 19 C.16 G. 8 F. 15 H.12 B. 12 D. 15 B.23 D. 6 B. 7 B.6 B.8 A.20 A.24 A. 23 A.22 D.32 G. 23 D. 55 1773 .785 9952.727 10253.914 19126 .195 4089.891 13074.242 19348 .281 18536.172 5016.121 40827.070 17721.848 150961 .391 17901.301 155577.469 156197.781 10505.410 130074.820 49344.848 36765.438 97429. 008 209843.594 17412. 492 10425. 941 11386.965 14884.848 127839.898 23375.570 45154.957 56326. 441 21658.664 57588. 277 58050.758 19331. 047 20257.313 21422. 320 7900. 504 5334. 000 34924.445 57519. 996 5643. 855 315021. 906 3903.352 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSI ON RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSI ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CO MMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION COM MISSION RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATI ON COMMISSION RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSPORTATION COM MISSION R OUG VIRGINIA SAN JACINT O TRAVEL CENTER SCHUG R OBERT SCHWARTZ MARVIN SCHWARTZ MARVIN SCHWEISS KAREN SECURITY TRUST CO SECURITY TRUST CO SEEHOFFER HARRY A SIGNAL HILL FA MILY LTD PARTNERSHIP SIGNAL HILL FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP SPERRY LTD PARTNERSHIP SPYKSMA SPYKSMA STUEBER STUEBER STUEBER SUSS SUTTON SWEANY THO MPSO N THOMPSO N TODD TO RKELSO N TURGEON US HOLDINGS US HOLDINGS US HOLDINGS US HOLDINGS US HOLDINGS US HOLDINGS US HOLDINGS V R DENNIS CONSTRUCTION CO VALDIVIA ELEANOR VALNITECO J OHN A JOHN A BRUNNO BRUNNO J OSEPHINE GLENN MARY F BARBARA JA MES F MARVIN L TIM M MADGE D DENISE L A H 0/0 GEORGE LINDEN BAU H 0/0 GEORGE LINDEN BAU ANN 0/0 JERREL BARTO 0/0 JERREL BARTO BRUNO STUEBER CI O EFFIE THOMPS ON C/ 0 FORECLOSURE • 7 of 16 APN SEGMENT NUMBER AREA LAST NA ME MIDDLE FIRST NAME NAME CI O 455130005 431140007 431140009 431140014 455130003 O 466050009 455130036 431260015 co 465190030 463090013 455120065 455120014 431020006 431020015 463170025 458250012 465020040 430130038 465020030 465100011 441020012 441160001 455130015 465250021 458242012 441020008 441020009 441020011 6S ETC ETC WRR 6S SR MR WRR SR 6S 6S WRR 3NR 3NR 3SR 6S MR 1NR MR MR WRR ETC 6S 4SR 6S ETC ETC ETC D .56 G .28 G.27 F .23 D.53 A.2 E.25 F .21 A.4 D.1 D.74 F. 4 1.15 1.14 B.1 D.28 E.23 H.25 E.22 E. 4 F.12 G. 5 D.62 C.17 D.35 G.18 G. 17 G. 19 4712.617 314321 .688 307575.063 127560.984 14990 .801 8933.406 130778.859 77134 .859 143962 .688 48232 .109 18914.164 125816 .617 634223.313 468889 .438 20623.063 634908.188 98139.844 98983. 867 261131.375 39061. 711 49260.102 72532.469 223732.344 10654.266 4273. 246 19210.973 51700.605 85080.109 VALNITECO INC VANDAM FRANCES VANDERHAM NELL VANDERHAM NELL VANDOORN ROGER VANHORN WAYNE A VERDE INV INC WAITERS REECE & DEBORAH FAMILY TRUST WARD WEIR WELCH WESSELINK WESTRA WESTRA WILL L M M ZENY DOUGLAS RALPH C LEO JAKE JAKE CARL WINCHESTER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP WOLNY GAIL WONG MING CHEUNG WOODS CANYON ASSOC WOODSON WYBENGA YAU YEE YESFO RD ZELENIK ZWART ZWART ZWART J J E HENRY ROBERT MARGARET KENNETH WILLIAM STEPHEN CASE CASE CASE VALNITECO INC C/O ROGER VAN D OORN CIO NANCY Y OUN G CIO JOHN LOVELL K C/O GRACE M KAELIN 0 A JOAN R N A J , 16 • STREEDDRESS 12466 LEWIS 12466 LEWIS 4801 W 96TH ST 4801 W 96TH ST P O BOX 457 27 SUNFLOWER 427 S MARENGO AVE STE 1 427 S MARENGO AVE STE 1 2733 COTTO NWOOD AVE 2733 COTTONWO OD AVE 2733 COTTONWOOD AVE 1325 W CAMINO DEL SUR 1325 W CAMINO DEL SUR 4116 TEE RD 35650 HIDDEN SPRINGS RD 35650 HIDDEN SPRINGS RD 35650 HIDDEN SPRINGS RD 35650 HIDDEN SPRINGS RD 18525 W AVENUE E4 14651 S GROVE AVE 2201 SOUTH A ST CITY STATE ZIP CODE PH ONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS • 22892 MILL CREEK DR 22892 M ILL CREEK DR 25301 CABOT RD STE 105 26180 BERNICE ST P 0 BOX 7273 40265 POPPY DR 710 CAWSTON AVE 710 CAWSTO N AVE 1410 BELHAVEN RD 1225 E LATHAM STE A 18422 E VANTAGE PO INTE DR 3343 N TYLER AVE 4 N 680 WARE WO ODS DR 4 N 680 WARE WOODS DR 751 LOS ALTOS AVE 1701 S SUM MER LAWN WAY PO BOX 1996 P 0 BOX 1996 450 E LATHAM AVE CHINO CHINO OVERLAND PARK OVERLAND PARK WILDOMAR IRVINE PASADENA PASADENA SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO SAN DIMAS SAN DI MAS SARASOTA HEMET HEMET HEMET HEMET LANCASTER CHINO PERRIS LAGUNA HILLS LAGUNA HILLS LAGUNA HILLS HEMET HEMET HEMET SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO SAN MARINO HEMET CA CA KS KS CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA FL CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA ROWLAND HEIGHT CA EL MO NTE CA ST CHARLES TN ST CHARLES TN LO S ALTOS CA HACIENDA HEIGHT CA PALM DESERT PALM DESERT HEMET CA CA CA 91710 91710 66207 913 .648.8083 66207 913.648.8083 92595 92604 91101 91101 92582 92582 92582 91773 91773 33580 92545 92545 92545 92545 93536 91710 92570 0 92653 92653 92653 91545 92546 92544 92582 92582 91108 92543 91748 91731 60175 60175 94022 91745 0 92261• 92261 92543 YES YES 760. 346.8395, OR 760.779.9634 760.346. 8395, OR 760. 779. 9634 9 of 16 STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS 450 E LATHAM AVE HEMET CA 92543 450 E LATHAM AVE HEMET CA 92543 450 E LATHAM AVE HEMET CA 92543 450 E LATHAM AVE HEMET CA 92543 450 E LATHAM AVE HEMET CALIF CA 92543 CD O 450 E LATHAM AVE HEMET CA 92543 p 25060 HANCO CK AVE NO 181 MURRIETA CA 92562 25060 HANCOCK AVE NO 181 MURRIETA CA 92562 W3133 7TH ST RIVERSIDE CA 92501 CD3525 14TH ST RIVERSIDE CA 92501 3525 14TH ST RIVERSIDE CA 92501 3525 14TH ST RIVERSIDE CA 92501 27710 JEFFERSON AVE NO 302 TEMECULA CA 92590 27710 JEFFERSON AVE NO 302 TEMECULA CA 92590 1901 BROOKDALE AVE LA HABRA CA 90631 8176 GRAPEWIN ST CORONA CA 92880 8176 GRAPEWIN ST CORONA CA 92880 18731 SE 432ND ST ENUMCLAW WA 98022 1700 S ELDERBERRY CT ONTARIO CA 91762 1700 S ELDERBERRY CT ONTARIO CA 91762 1455 N WARREN RD SAN JACINTO CA 92582 1455 N WARREN RD SAN JACINTO CA 0 909 .654 .8166 business 1455 N WARREN RD SAN JACINTO CA 92582 909 .654 .8166 business P 0 BOX 559 LAKEVIEW CA 92567 P 0 BO X 250 NUEVO CA 92567 1520 COUNTRY CLUB DR RIVERSIDE CA 92506 2097 BEGO NIA CT HEM ET CA 92545 1520 COUNTRY CLUB DR RIVERSIDE CA 92506 1520 COUNTRY CLUB DR RIVERSIDE CA 92506 27750 S CORNELL HEMET CA 92544 P 0 BOX 1575 ROMOLAND CA 92585 P 0 BOX 1575 ROMOLAND CA 92585 P 0 BOX 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BOX 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BOX 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BOX 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BOX 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BO X 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BOX 45 WINCHESTER CA 92596 P 0 BOX 54136 LOS ANGELES CA 90054 P 0 BOX 54136 LO S ANGELES CA 90054 0 YES 10 of • STREEtDDRESS P 0 B OX 8300 P 0 BOX 8300 P 0 BOX 8300 P 0 BOX 8300 P 0 BO X 8300 P 0 BOX 8300 P 0 BOX 8300 3141 S RIVERSIDE AVE 3141 S RIVERSIDE AVE 3141 S RIVERSIDE AVE P 0 BOX 5441 3686 CEDAR AVE 801 N PARK CENTER STE 235 801 N PARK CENTER STE 235 4041 M ACARTHUR BLV STE 500 2006 HIGHWAY 395 3390 CRYSTAL SPRINGS DR NE 43529 RIDGE PARK DR P 0 BO X 3967 1 S CRAPPIE CORNER DR NO 3 1950 S M OUNTAIN AVE NO 19 1950 S MOUNTAIN AVE NO 19 1950 S MOUNTAIN AVE NO 19 1950 S MOUNTAIN AVE NO 19 4334 N GO LDEN STATE BLVD 5038 BLACKHORSE RD 5038 BLACKHO RSE RD 5038 BLACKHORSE RD 5038 BLACKHORSE RD 4335 N GO LDEN STATE 103 5142 AVENIDA ENCINIS 5142 AVENIDA ENCINIS 5142 AVENIDA ENCINIS 395 N SAN JACINTO ST STE B 395 N SAN JACINTO ST STE B 10426 CASANES AVE 10426 CASANES AVE 10426 CASANES AVE 10426 CASANES AVE 10426 CASANES AVE CITY • STATE ZIP CODE PHONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS PERRIS CA PERRIS CA PERRIS CA PERRIS CA PERRIS CA PERRIS CA PERRIS CA BLOOMINGT ON CA BLOOMINGTON CA BL OOMINGTON CA SAN BERNARDINO CA LYNWOOD CA SANTA ANA CA SANTA ANA CA NEWPORT BEACH CA FALLBROOK CA BAINBRIDGE ISLA WA TEMECULA CA TUSTIN ELWOOD ONTARIO ONTARIO ONTARIO ONTARIO FRESNO CA NE CA CA CA CA CA RANCHO PALO S V CA RANCHO PALOS V CA RANCHO PALOS V CA RANCHO PALO S V CA FRESNO CA CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD HEMET HEMET DOWNEY DOWNEY DOWNEY DOWNEY DOWNEY CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 92572 92572 92572 92572 92572 92572 92572 92316 92316 92316 92412 90262 92705 92705 92660 92028 98110 92590 92681 68937 91762 91762 91762 91762 93722 90275 90275 90275 90275 93722 0 92008 92008 92008 0 92543 92543 90241 562.869.4716 90241 90241 90241 90241 562. 869. 4716 YES YES 11 of 16 STREET ADDRESS CITY ST ATE ZIP CODE PH ONE UNKN OWN ADDRESS 1605 SAN VICENTE BLV 1605 SAN VICENTE BLV 24011 WARREN RD 24011 WARREN RD O 25105 HYATT O 8050 HELLM AN AVE O 8050 HELLM AN AVE 8290 HELLMAN AVE 8050 HELLMAN AVE 00 8290 HELLM AN AVE 42245 OAK CANYON DR 42245 OAK CANYON DR 42245 OAK CANYON DR 28095 WASHINGTON AVE P 0 BOX 956 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 34785 SIMPSON AVE 34785 SIM PSO N AVE 34785 SIMPSON AVE 189 STO CKBRIDGE AVE 509 VIA CODO P 0 BOX 870 200 N 8TH ST 17508 MARENGO DR P 0 BOX 6029 751 HILLSIDE DR 751 HILLSIDE DR 751 HILLSIDE DR 751 HILLSIDE DR 26589 California Ave.(541 N. 26589 California Ave. (541 N. 541 N WARREN RD 26383 CYNTHIA ST 9146 DE ADALANA 920 W RAMO NA EXPWY 4335 N GOLDEN ST NO 103 Warren Warren SANTA M ONICA SANTA MONICA SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO HEMET C OR ONA C ORONA C OR ONA CORONA C OR ONA HEMET HE MET HEMET WINCHESTER WINCHESTER BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY HILLS HEMET HEMET HEMET ALHAM BRA FULLERTON CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA WINCHESTER CA ROGERS AR ROWLAND HEIGHT CA AUBURN CA LONG BEACH CA LO NG BEACH CA LONG BEACH CA LONG BEACH CA A Hemet CA (San Jaci CA A Hemet CA (San Jaci CA SAN JACINTO CA HEMET CA ROSEM EAD CA SAN JACINTO CA FRESNO CA 90402 CALL Andy Layman TO ENTER PROP. 310.395 .3313, KH 310.451.2020 90402 CALL Andy Layman TO ENTER PROP . 310 .395 .3313, KH 310.451.2020 92582 92582 0 YES 92545 92880 92880 92880 92880 92880 92543 92543 92543 92596 92596 90211 90211 92545 92545 92545 0 YES 91801 92835 0 YES 92596 72756 91748 95604 90815 714.680 .4965 90815 714.680.4965 90815 714.680.4965 90815 92545 (92 909. 926.2033 92545 (92 909.926.2033 92582 92544 91770 92582 93722 0 YES 0 YES *16 • • STREET A•ESS CITY STATE ZIP C OD*H ONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS • P O BOX 1975 P O BOX 1975 18101 VON KARMAN SUITE 350 18101 VON KARMAN STE 350 12490 CENTRAL AVE P O BOX 54153 P O BO X 54153 P O BO X 54153 P O BOX 54153 PO BOX 54153 P O BO X 54153 PO BOX 54153 P O BOX 54153 P O BOX 54153 P O BOX 54153 P O BOX 54153 P 0 BO X 54143 P 0 BOX 54143 2005 W 236TH ST 20505 VIA BURGOS 5336 RUNNING FAWN CT 5336 RUNNING FAWN CT 40925 COUNTRY CENTER 110 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR 110 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR 110 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR 110 13551 M AGNOLIA AVE 13551 MAGNO LIA AVE 801 N PARK CENTER STE 235 801 N PARK CENTER STE 235 130 S SAN JACINTO ST 28140 DAKOTA DR 8140 DAKO TA DR 8140 DAKOTA DR 8140 DAKO TA DR X11011 E RIVERSIDE DR G71484 CLYDESDALE CT J1484 CLYDESDALE CT 1484 CLYDESDALE CT 1484 CLYDESDALE CT SANTA MONICA SANTA MONICA IRVINE IRVINE CHINO L OS ANGELES LOS AN GELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES L OS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES TORRANCE YORBA LINDA CUGAMONGA CUCAMONGA TEMECULA TEMECULA TEMECULA TEM ECULA CO RO NA CORONA SANTA ANA SANTA ANA HEMET QUAIL VALLEY QUAIL VALLEY QUAIL VALLEY QUAIL VALLEY ONTARIO HEMET HEMET HEM ET HEMET 0 YES CA 90406 CA 90406 CA 92612 949.474.8200 his law office number CA 92612 CA 91710 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90054 CA 90052 CA 90052 CA 90501 CA 92887 CA 91737 CA 91737 CA 92591 CA 92591 CA 92591 CA 92591 CA 92879 CA 92879 CA 92705 CA 92705 0 YES CA 92543 CA 92587 CA 92587 CA 92587 CA 92587 CA 91761 CA 92543 CA 92543 CA 92543 CA 92543 13 of 16 STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS P 0 BOX 1216 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 P 0 BOX 1216 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 P 0 BOX 1216 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 P 0 BOX 1216 MARYSVILLE CA 95901 3001 MOCKINGBIRD LN HEMET CA 92544 3001 MO CKINGBIRD LN HEMET CA 92544 0 3001 MO CKINGBIRD LN HEMET CA 92544 = 4420 BRIGHTON CT HE MET CA 92544 4.. 1779 E FLORIDA NO A HEMET CA 92544 909 .766.4618 O 5994 SHAKER RIVERSIDE CA 92506 1275 E LATHAM STE A HEMET CA 92543 1275 E LATHAM STE A HEMET CA 92543 920 W RAM ONA EXPRESSWAY SAN JACINT O CA 92582 P 0 BO X 3603 BIG BEAR LAKE CA 92315 P 0 BOX 3603 BIG BEAR LAKE CA 92315 967 SANDERSO N AVE HEMET CA 92545 35125 SIMPSON RD HEMET CA 92545 35125 SIMPSON RD HEM ET CA 92545 35125 SIMPSON RD HEMET CA 92545 35125 SIMPSON RD HEMET CA 92545 1950 S MO UNTAIN AVE 2015 ONTARIO CA 91762 P 0 BO X 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BO X 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 1995 MARKET ST RIVERSIDE CA 92501 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BO X 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BO X 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BO X 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BO X 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 P 0 BO X 1083 RIVERSIDE CA 92502 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 RIVERSIDE CA 92501 • •16 • STREODDRESS 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 3560 UNIVERSITY AVE NO 100 111 PINE BLUFF DR 2070 N SANDERSON AVE 141 VISTA DEL PARQUE 141 VISTA DEL PARQUE 2976 LIVE OAK ST PO BOX 121589 P O BOX 121589 1041 W 18TH ST STE 101A 1041 W 18TH ST STE 101A 9031 SHELLEY DR 2451 RAMO NA EXPY 2451 RAMONA EXY 27400 STUEBER LAND 27400 STUEBER LN 27400 STUEBER LAND 4334 N GOLDEN STATE BL 103 P 0 BOX 720063 3901 W ESPLANADE AVE PO BOX 1063 732 CO RRIDA DR 250 E VILLA RITA DR 1675 PALM BEACH LAKES BL p 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 - 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 O 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 ` 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 291 S LA CIENEGA BL 307 7075 M ISSION G ORGE STE A 36780 ESPLANADE P O BOX 185 CITY RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE BEAVER CREEK SAN JACINTO STATE ZIP OPE PHONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS CA CA CA CA CA CA CA OH CA REDONDO BEACH CA RED ONDO BEACH CA HE MET CA SAN DIEGO CA SAN DIEGO CA COSTA MESA COSTA MESA GARDEN GROVE SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO HEMET HEMET HEMET CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA FRESNO CA PINON HILLS CA HEMET CA HEMET CA COVINA CA LA HABRA CA WEST PALM BEAC FL BEVERLY HILLS CA BEVERLY HILLS CA BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY HILLS SAN DIEG O SAN JACINTO HEMET CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 92501 92501 92501 92501 92501 92501 92501 45440 92582 0 90277 90277 92545 92112 92112 0 92627 92627 92841 92582 909 .228.2482 92582 92545 92545 92545 0 93722 92372 92545 92546 91724 90631 33401 90211 90211 90211 90211 90211 90211 90211 92120 92582 92546 YES YES • 15 of 16 STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PH ONE UNKNOWN ADDRESS BOX 185 13123 E ROSECRANS AVE 13123 E ROSECRANS AVE 42065 PASEO SOMRISA 30093 WINCHESTER RD c) 3434 E BROADWAY BLV 2811 N CASITAS AVE oR 1026 JASMINE CT iJ P 0 BOX 899 1330 RAM ONA BLV 11023 EUCALYPTUS AVE 11023 EUCALYPTUS AVE 25060 HANCO CK AVE NO 181 5403 S SANTE FE AVE 42245 O AK CANYO N DR 2802 N SURREY 355 N LANTANA ST NO 670 725A LOMA VERDE AVE P O BOX 201 P 0 BOX 327 1471 ELECTRA BAY 1471 ELECTRA BAY 1471 ELECTRA BAY HE MET SANTA FE SPRING CA SANTA FE SPRIN G CA TE MECULA CA WINCHESTER TUCS ON ALTADENA VISTA WINCHESTER SAN JACINTO ONTARIO ONTARIO MURRIETA VERNON HEMET ORANGE CAM ARILLO PALO ALTO CERRITOS WINCHESTER LAKE HAVASU CIT AZ LAKE HAVASU CIT AZ LAKE HAVASU CIT AZ CA 92546 0 YES 90670 90670 92591 CA 92596 AZ 85716 CA 91001 CA 92083 CA 92596 0 YES CA 92582 CA 91761 CA 91761 West Investors 530 .284.7790, other 805.693.5178 CA 92562 CA 90058 CA 92544 CA 92667 CA 93010 909 .506 .6556 0 YES 0 YES CA 94303 CA 90701 CA 92596 0 86404 86404 86404 YES • • 16 AGENDA ITEfrI 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Erik Galloway, Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: State Route 74 Realignment Project Amendment to Construction Management Contract with DMJM + Harris STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Enter into Agreement No. 02-31-035, Amendment No. 1 to contract RO-2127, with DMJM + Harris to perform Water Quality Monitoring and Sampling for a Base Amount of $52,410, and a contingency amount of $7,590 for a total contract amount not to exceed $60,000; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The State Route 74 Realignment project is a Measure "A" project from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in the City of Perris (The Project). The Project will be constructed in two segments. Segment 1 is from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to approximately 1,640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road. Segment 2 is from approximately 1,640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road to 7th Street in the City of Perris. Segment 1 will be constructed first. At the September 2000 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved the award of Contract No. RO-2127 to Holmes & Narver Infrastructure, now known as DMJM + Harris, to provide construction management support services for Segment I of State Route 74. In January 2001 the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) adopted Order No. 01-34 to minimize or preclude storm water runoff pollutants from entering the impaired water bodies of Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. The order requires monitoring and sampling of discharge water from the construction site to evaluate whether the project is discharging pollutants into the impaired water bodies. 000043 Therefore during construction of Segment 1 the discharge from the site will need to be monitored and sampled. DMJM + Harris will be on site during the construction of Segment 1. To achieve compliance with the requirements of Order No. 01-34, staff recommends that the existing Construction Management Contract, RO-2127, with DMJM + Harris be expanded to include monitoring, sampling, and reporting of storm water discharge. The total value of the work included in Amendment No. 1 is $52,410 with extra work of $7,590 for a total value of Amendment 1 not to exceed $60,000. Amendment No. 1 will increase the authorized contract value to $1,107,210 with a new contingency balance of $102,790. Attached is DMJM + Harris's Scope of Services and costs estimate. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2001/02 Amount: $ 60,000 Source of Funds: Bond Proceeds GLA No.: 222 31 81302 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Budget Adjustment: N Date: 11-15-01 Attachment 00004 DMJMUHARRIS • • 4, cc- October 31, 2001 Mr. Eric Galloway, P.E., Project Coordinator Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 :iov 0 1 2001 'ECHTELCORF SUBJECT: SAN JACINTO NPDES PERMIT MONITORING AND SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS Dear Mr. Galloway: DMJM+HARRIS proposes to provide monitoring and sampling services for the construction improvements along State Highway 74 in compliance with the San Jacinto NPDES Permit requirements. The Scope of Work for these services is as follows: 1 Develop and submit a Monitoring and Reporting Program for approval by the Executive Officer (RWQCB) and submit a copy to the local agency per SECTION B: MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM of the STORM WATER PERMIT FOR THE SAN JAC INTO WATERSHED. Included in this effort are: A. Develop and submit Draft Plan to RCTC B. Meet with RCTC/Caltrans and SARWQCB to discuss comments and proposed approach C. Incorporate comments and submit Final Draft to SARWQCB for review D. Obtain SARWQCB comments, discuss with RCTC/Caltrans and SARWQCB E. Submit Final Monitoring and Reporting Program 2. Provide Run-on and/or Background Monitoring at locations indurated identified in the Conceptual SWPPP on WPCD drawings number 14 (north of Wasson Canyon Road) and number 15 (near Peach Street). Samples taken as part of this effort and "Discharge Monitoring" below will be analyzed for the following: A. TSS B. Total Inorganic Nitrogen C. Total Phosphorus �N 't_COM COMPANY 000045 Mr. Eric Galloway, P.E., Project Coordinator Riverside County Transportation Commission October 31, 2001 Page 2 of 2 D. Soluble Reactive Phosphorus E. Acute Toxicity/Hazardous Waste Screening F. Fecal Coliform G. Total Col form H. pH 3. Provide Discharge Monitoring at the locations indicate in 2 above. 4. Provide Site Inspections 5. Provide Compliance Certification 6. Provide Post -construction monitoring for one year The Scope of Work described above does not include review of either the Conceptual SWPP Plan or the Contractor's SWPPP. The estimated cost of providing the effort described in the scope of work above is $53,871.00 as shown on the attached spread sheets. Sincerely yours, DMJ HA : ' IS orge Proje ager Attachment 000046 TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF COSTS • Direct Salary Coats $ 10,936 Payroll Additives (Fringe) @ Overhead Costs © Subtotal @ 39.00% $ 4,265 60.60% $ 6,627 99.60% $ 10,892 Total Labor Costs $ 21,828.26 Fixed Fee @ 10.00% $ 2,182.83 Other Direct Costs/Outside Services $ 29,860 Total • • $ 53,871 000047 TABLE 2: HOURLY BREAKDOWN AND OTHER DIRECT COSTS 1. Prepare, submit, review and revise Monitoring and Sampling Program Subtotal 2,3,6. Sample/Test/Analysis per event Prepare for Sampling Collect Samples (5), Store, Prepare for Analysis per event Administration Subtotal Number of Events' Subtotal for all events Lab Analysis of Samples (5) $ 2,380.00 Evaluate Results of Lab Analysis 4 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 4 $ 2,480.00 12 12 48 $29,760.00 lit, ! ` •: ��._. �...... a, ,- ., .. ,, ' , . 17 4. Provide Site Inspections ite inspection 1 • prow• y currently assign -• personne at no additional cost 5. Provide Compliance Certification Subtotal TOTAL ALL TASKS 95 4 192 48 $29,880.00 •Number of Events Pre -Construction Sampling/Monitonng 3 During Construction Samiing/Monitoring (2 Seasons) 6 Post Construction Sampling/Monitoring 3 12 000048 • • TOTAL P.04 AGENDA ITEfrf 9 1 • • RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: State Route 60 HOV Project Design Cooperative Agreements No. 8-1173 Between Caltrans and RCTC STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval of: 1) The attached form of agreement in order to enter into cooperative Agreement No. 8-1 173 with Caltrans for the design work of the State Route 60 HOV Project from I-215/SR60 Interchange to Redlands Boulevard; 2) Authorize the Executive director to negotiate the final changes required; 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute - the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the July 1999 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved the State Route 60 HOV median -widening project. This Measure "A" and CMAQ funded widening project is located between 1-215/SR60 Interchange and Redlands Boulevard in the City of Moreno Valley. At the February 9, 2000, RCTC meeting, the Commission awarded a final design contract value for $2,299,400 for the subject project to Holmes & Narver Infrastructure. At the April 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment #1 for additional bridge design work. In addition, the Commission approved $40,000 of extra work funds. The total value of Amendment #1 approved by the Commission was for $601,460. 000049 At the June 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment #2 to delete some of the bridge work and to add the preparation of PSRs for the Indian Avenue, Nason Street and Moreno Beach Drive bridges for an additional amount of $44,290. At the September 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment #3 for additional lead testing at the new sound wall locations and along the pavement area for a base amount of $84,712. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,029,862. During the last PDT meeting, staff discussed with Caltrans staff the need to complete and finalize the Design Cooperative Agreement for this project. The most recent draft form of the Design Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1 173 for the design work of the State Route 60 HOV Project from I-215/SR60 Interchange to Redlands Boulevard is attached for your information and review as negotiations are continuing between Caltrans and RCTC staff. A separate construction cooperative agreement will be prepared by Caltrans and will be forwarded to the Commission for approval at a future date. Attachment: Draft Design Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1 173 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2001/02 Amount: $ N/A Source of Funds: CMAQ / Measure A GLA No.: 222-31-81102 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Budget Adjustment: N Date: 11-15-01 000050 • • • 08-Riv-60-KP R 19.9/32.7 Add two HOV Lanes and Ramp Re -configurations at SR 60 and Perris Boulevard Interchange 08303 - 463600 District Agreement No. 8-1173 DESIGN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into on , is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE", and RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public entity, referred to herein as "COMMISSION". RECITALS (1) STATE and COMMISSION, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within the City of Riverside County of Riverside. (2) COMMISSION desires State highway improvements consisting of adding one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane in each direction replacement of the Perris Boulevard Undercrossing, Soundwalls at various locations, median widening of existing bridge structures at Pigeon Pass Road and Heacock Street and a Fiber Optic system which will connect the existing ramp metering system, referred to herein as "PROJECT", and is willing to fund one hundred percent (100%) of all capital outlay and staffing costs, except for costs of STATE's oversight of environmental, design and right of way activities. Funding for this PROJECT will be accomplished through the use of congestion mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds and Measure "A" funds, Measure "A" was approved by Riverside county voters in November, 1988. (4) This Agreement supersedes any prior Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) relating to PROJECT. (3) DRAFT, October 25, 2001 1 District Agreement No. 8-1173 (5) Construction of PROJECT will be the subject of a separate future Agreement. (6) The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be developed, designed, and financed. SECTION I COMMISSION AGREES: (1) To fund one hundred percent (100%) of all preliminary and design engineering costs, including, but not limited to, costs incurred for the preparation of contract documents, advertising for bids, and for awarding the construction contract for PROJECT. (2) To have a Supplemental Project Report (SPR), including all necessary environmental documentation (ED), Right of Way maps, and detailed Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) prepared, at no cost to STATE, and to submit each to STATE for STATE's review and concurrence at appropriate stages of development. The SPR, R/W maps and the final plans and specifications for PROJECT shall be signed by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California. (3) To permit STATE to monitor and participate in the selection of personnel who will prepare the SPR, conduct environmental studies and obtain approval for PROJECT, prepare the PS&E, and provide the right of way engineering services, and to permit STATE to oversee the performance of right of way activities. COMMISSION agrees to consider any request by STATE to discontinue the services of any personnel considered by STATE to be unqualified on the basis of credentials, professional expertise, failure to perform in accordance with the scope of work and/or other pertinent criteria. (4) Personnel who prepare the PS&E and right of way maps shall be made available to STATE, at no cost to STATE, through completion of construction of PROJECT to discuss problems which may arise during construction and/or to make design revisions for contract change orders. (5) Not to use funds from STATE for any capital and support costs for PROJECT. afid-te-net PROJECT. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 2 000052 • • • District Agreement No. 8-1173 (6) To make written application to STATE for necessary encroachment permits authorizing entry of COMMISSION onto the STATE highway right of way to perform surveying and other investigative activities required for preparation of the SPR, ED, R/W maps and/or PS&E. (7) (8) To identify and locate all utility facilities within the area of PROJECT as part of the design responsibility for PROJECT. All utility facilities not relocated or removed in advance of construction shall be identified on the PS&E for PROJECT. To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities within the area of PROJECT and to protect or otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with STATE's "Manual on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way." COMMISSION hereby acknowledges receipt of STATE's "Manual on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way." (9) If any existing public and/or private utility facilities conflict with the construction of PROJECT or violate STATE's encroachment policy, COMMISSION shall make all necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their protection, relocation, or removal in accordance with STATE's policy and procedure for those facilities located within the limits of work included in the improvement to the State highway and in accordance with COMMISSION's policy for those facilities which are or will be located outside of the limits of the State highway. The total costs to PROJECT of such protection, relocation, or removal within the present of future State highway right of way shall be determined in accordance with STATE's policies and procedures. (10) To furnish evidence to STATE, in a form acceptable to STATE, that arrangements have been made for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities within the State highway right of way and that such work will be completed prior to the award of the contract to construct PROJECT or as covered in the PS&E for said contract. This evidence shall include a reference to all required State highway encroachment permits. (11) COMMISSION shall require any utility owner and/or its contractor performing the protection of relocation work within the State highway right of way to obtain an encroachment permit from STATE prior to the performance of said work. (12) To acquire and furnish all right of way, if any, outside of the existing State highway right of way and to perform all right of way activities, including all eminent domain activities, if necessary, at no cost to STATE, and in accordance with procedures acceptable to STATE. These activities shall comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, subject to STATE's oversight to insure that the completed work is acceptable for incorporation into the State highway right of way. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 3 0000153 District Agreement No. 8-1173 (13) To utilize the services of a qualified public agency or a qualified consultant, as determined by STATE's District Division Chief of Right of Way, in all matters related to the acquisition of right of way in accordance with STATE's procedures as published in STATE's current Right of Way Manual. Whenever personnel other than personnel of a qualified public agency are utilized, administration of the personnel contract shall be performed by a qualified Right of Way person employed or retained by COMMISSION. (14) To certify legal and physical control of right of way ready for construction and that all right of way parcels were acquired in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, subject to review and concurrence by STATE prior to the advertisement for bids for the contract to construct PROJECT. (15) To deliver to STATE legal title to the right of way, including access rights, free and clear of all encumbrances detrimental to STATE's present and future uses not later than the date of acceptance by STATE of maintenance and operation of the highway facility. Acceptance of said title by STATE is subject to a review of a Policy of Title Insurance in the name of the State of California to be provided and paid for by COMMISSION. (16) To provide, at no cost to STATE, survey and mapping services necessary to perpetuate existing land net and alignment monumentation in accordance with Sections 8771 and 8765 of the Business and Professions Code; and to permanently monument the location of all roadway alignments, realignments, and right of way acquisitions. All of the above are to be shown on a Record of Survey filed with the County Surveyor. COMMISSION shall deliver one copy of any field notes, filed Corner Records, and the Record of Survey required for execution of the above obligation, to STATE's District 08 Survey Branch. (17) To prepare Right of Way Engineering Hard Copies, Right of Way. Appraisal Maps, Record of Surveys, and Right of Way Record Maps in accordance with the State of California right of Way manual, Chapter 6 - Right of Way Engineering, the State of California drafting and Plans Manual, the State of California Surveys manual Chapter 10, applicable State laws, and other pertinent reference materials and examples as provided by STATE. (18) To have all necessary Right of Way Maps and Documents used to acquire right of way by COMMISSION, prepared by or under the direction of a person authorized to practice land surveying in the State of California. Each Right of Way Map and Document shall bear the appropriate professional seal, certificate number, expiration date of registration certification and signature of the licensed person in "Responsible Charge of Work". DRAFT, October 25, 2001 4 000054 • • • District Agreement No. 8-1173 (19) To submit to STATE for review and acceptance all Right of Way Engineering Hard Copies and Right of Way. Appraisal maps with appurtenant back-up and reference data prior to preparation of legal descriptions and acquisition documents. (20) To be responsible, at COMMISSION's expense, for the investigation of potential hazardous material sites within and outside of the existing State highway right of way that would impact PROJECT as part of the responsibility for the ED for PROJECT. If COMMISSION encounters hazardous material or contamination within the existing State highway right of way during said investigation, COMMISSION shall immediately notify STATE and responsible control agencies of such discovery. (21) If COMMISSION desires to have STATE advertise, award and administer the construction contract for PROJECT, COMMISSION shall provide all plans prepared by COMMISSION or COMMISSION's consultant on Micro Release or Microstation SE V05.07.01.14. Windows x 86, _dgn files with media type ISO standard CD Rom format for review and approval. One copy of the data including the Engineer's electronic signature and seal, shall be provided to STATE upon completion of the final PS&E for PROJECT. STATE reserves the right to modify the requirements and STATE shall provide COMMISSION advance notice of any such modifications. Final plans and Special Provisions shall be signed by a Civil engineer registered in the State of California. (22) To obtain, at COMMISSION's expense, all necessary permits and/or agreements from appropriate regulatory agencies. All mitigation, monitoring, and/or remedial action required by said permits shall constitute parts of the cost of PROJECT. (23) All aerial photography and photogrammetric mapping shall conform to STATE's latest standards. (24) A copy of all original survey documents resulting from surveys performed for PROJECT, including original field notes, adjustment calculations, final results, and appropriate intermediate documents, shall be delivered to STATE and shall become property of STATE. For aerial mapping, survey documents to be furnished are three sets of contract prints, with one set showing control, a complete photo index - two prints and a copy of the negative, and the original aerial photography negative. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 5 000055 District Agreement No. 8-1173 SECTION II STATE AGREES: (1) At no cost to COMMISSION, to provide quality assurance activities of all work on PROJECT done by COMMISSION, including, but not limited to, investigation of potential hazardous material sites and all right of way activities undertaken by COMMISSION or its designee, and to provide prompt reviews and approvals, as appropriate, of submittals by COMMISSION, and to cooperate in timely processing of PROJECT. (2) Upon proper application by COMMISSION, to issue, at no cost to COMMISSION, an encroachment permit to COMMISSION authorizing entry onto the State highway right of way to perform survey and other investigative activities required for preparation of the SPR, ED, R/W maps and/or PS&E. If COMMISSION uses consultants rather than its own staff to perform required work, the consultants will also be required to obtain a separate encroachment permit. These permits will be issued at no cost upon proper application by the consultants. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: (1) All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature to STATE for the purposes of fulfilling STATE's obligations herein. (2) The parties hereto will carry out PROJECT in accordance with the Scope of Work, attached and made a part of this Agreement, which outlines the specific responsibilities of the parties hereto. The attached Scope of Work may be modified in writing in the future to reflect changes in the responsibilities of the respective parties. Such modifications shall be concurred with by COMMISSION's Director of Public Works or other official designated by COMMISSION and STATE's District Director for District 08 and become a part of this Agreement after execution of the amending document by the respective officials of the parties. (3) The Supplemental Project Report (SPR) for PROJECT approved on , by this reference, is made an express part of this Agreement. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 6 000056 • • • District Agreement No. 8-1173 (4) The basic design features as defined in Attachment 3 shall comply with those addressed in the approved SPR, unless modified as required for environmental clearance and/or FHWA approval of PROJECT. (5) The design, right of way acquisition, and preparation of environmental documents for PROJECT shall be performed in accordance with STATE's standards and practices current as of the date of performance. Any exceptions to applicable design standards shall first be approved by STATE via the processes outlined in STATE's Highway Design Manual and appropriate memorandums and design bulletins published by STATE. In the event that STATE proposes and/or requires a change in design standards, implementation of new or revised design standards shall be done as part of the work on PROJECT in accordance with STATE's current Highway Design Manual Section 82.5, "Effective Date for Implementing Revisions to Design Standards". STATE shall consult with COMMISSION in a timely manner regarding effect of proposed and/or required changes on PROJECT. (6) COMMISSIO.N's share of all changes in development and construction costs associated with modifications to the basic design features as described above shall be in same proportion as described in this Agreement, unless mutually agreed to the contrary by STATE and COMMISSION in a subsequent amendment to this Agreement. Any hazardous material or contamination of an HM -1 category found within the existing State highway right of way requiring remedy or remedial action, as defined in Division 20, Chapter 6.8 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code, shall be the responsibility of STATE, at STATE expense. For the purpose of this Agreement, hazardous material or contamination of HM -1 category is defined as that level or type of contamination which State or Federal regulatory control agencies having jurisdiction have determined must be remediated by reason of its mere discovery, regardless of whether it is disturbed by PROJECT or not. STATE shall sign the HM -1 manifest and, if STATE determines, in its sole judgment, that STATE's cost for remedy or remedial action is increased due to PROJECT, that additional cost identified by STATE shall be borne by COMMISSION. STATE will exert every effort to fund the remedy or remedial action for which STATE is responsible. In the event STATE is unable to provide funding, COMMISSION will have the option to either delay PROJECT until STATE is able to provide funding or COMMISSION may proceed with the remedy or medial action at COMMISSION expense without any subsequent reimbursement by STATE. (8) The remedy or remedial action with respect to any hazardous material or contamination of an HM -2 category found within the existing State highway right of way shall be the responsibility of COMMISSION, at COMMISSION expense, if COMMISSION decides to proceed with PROJECT. For the purposes of this Agreement, hazardous material or contamination of HM -2 category is defined as that level or type of contamination which said regulatory control agencies would have allowed to remain in place if undisturbed or (7) DRAFT, October 25, 2001 7 000057 District Agreement No. 8-1173 (9) otherwise protected in place should PROJECT not proceed. COMMISSION shall sign any HM -2 storage manifest if PROJECT proceeds and HM -2 material must be removed in lieu of being treated in place. If COMMISSION decides to not proceed with PROJECT, there will be no obligation to either COMMISSION or STATE other than COMMISSION's duty to cover and protect HM -2 material left in place. If hazardous material or contamination of either HM -1 or HM -2 category is found on new right of way to be acquired by COMMISSION for PROJECT, COMMISSION, as between COMMISSION and STATE only, shall be responsible, at COMMISSION expense, for all required remedy or remedial action and/or protection and shall guarantee STATE that said new right of way is clean prior to transfer of title to STATE in accordance with Article (15) of Section I of this Agreement. The generator of the hazardous material or, if none can be identified or found, the present property owner, whether a private entity or a local public agency, or COMMISSION, as a last resort, shall sign the manifest. (10) Locations subject to remedy or remedial action and/or protection include utility relocation work required for PROJECT. Costs for remedy and remedial action and/or protection shall include, but not limited to, the identification, treatment, protection, removal, packaging, transportation, storage, and disposal of such material. (11) The party responsible for funding any hazardous material cleanup shall be responsible for the development of the necessary remedy and/or remedial action plans and designs. Remedial actions proposed by COMMISSION on the State highway right of way shall be pre -approved by State and shall be performed in accordance with STATE's standards and practices and those standards mandated by the Federal and State regulatory agencies. (12) Should any portion of PROJECT be financed with Federal funds or State gas tax funds, all applicable laws, regulations and policies relating to the use of such funds shall apply, notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement. (13) A separate Cooperative Agreement will be required to cover responsibilities and funding for the construction phase of PROJECT. (14) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the development, design, construction, operation or maintenance of State highways and public facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 8 000058 • • • • • District Agreement No. 8-1173 (15) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COMMISSION under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COMMISSION shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COMMISSION under this Agreement. (16) Neither COMMISSION nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless COMMISSION from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. (17) This Agreement may be terminated or provisions contained herein may be altered, changed, or amended by mutual consent of the parties hereto. (18) Except as otherwise provided in Article (17) above, this Agreement shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT, or on December 31, 2007 whichever is earlier in time. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 9 000059 District Agreement No. 8-1173 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JEFF MORALES Director of Transportation By: ANNE E. MAYER District Director APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Attorney, Department of Transportation CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: District Budget Manager CERTIFIED AS TO FINANCIAL TERMS AND POLICIES: Accounting Administrator DRAFT, October 25, 2001 10 000001) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: William G. Kleindienst Chairman REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ERIC HALEY Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Steven C. DeBaum Best, Best and Krieger District Agreement No. 8-1173 SCOPE OF WORK • This Scope of Work outlines the specific areas of responsibility for various project development activities for the proposed High Occupancy (HOV) lanes and replacement of the Perris Boulevard Undercrossing in Riverside County. 1. COMMISSION will provide the necessary environmental compliance for PROJECT. COMMISSION will perform all studies to document and defend the Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) determination. STATE will sign the CE/CE determination sheet. If, during preliminary engineering or preparation of the PS&E, new information is obtained which requires the preparation of an environmental compliance document, this Agreement will be amended to include completion of these additional tasks by COMMISSION. 2. COMMISSION and STATE concur that the proposal is a Category 4A as defined in STATE's Project Development Procedures Manual. • • 3. COMMISSION will submit drafts of environmental technical reports and individual sections of the draft environmental documents to STATE, as they are developed, for review and comment. Traffic counts and projections to be used in the various reports shall be supplied by STATE if available, or by COMMISSION. Existing traffic data shall be furnished by COMMISSION. 4. STATE will review, monitor, and approve all project development reports, studies, and plans, and provide all necessary implementation activities up to, but not including advertising of PROJECT. 5. The existing freeway agreement need not be revised. 6. All phases of the PROJECT, from inception through construction, whether done by COMMISSION or STATE, will be developed in accordance with all policies, procedures, practices, and standards that STATE would normally follow. 7. Detailed steps in the project development process are attached to this Scope of Work. These attachments are intended as a guide to STATE's and COMMISSION's staff. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 11 0000B1 District Agreement No. 8-1173 ATTACHMENT 1 PLANNING PHASE ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBILITY PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE LOCAL AGENCY 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS & DOCUMENT PREPARATION Establish Project Development Team (PDT) X X Approve PDT X Project Category Determination X Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment X Identify Preliminary Alternatives and Costs X Prepare and Submit Environmental Studies and Reports X Review and Approve Environmental Studies and Reports X Prepare and Submit Draft Environmental Document (DED) X Review DED in District X 2. PROJECT GEOMETRICS DEVELOPMENT Prepare Existing Traffic Analysis X Prepare Future Traffic Volumes for Alternatives X Prepare Project Geometrics and Profiles X Prepare Layouts and Estimates for Alternatives X Prepare Operational Analysis for Alternatives X Review and Approve Project Geometrics and Operational Analysis X 3. PROJECT APPROVAL Lead Agency for Environment Compliance Certifies ED in Accordance with its Procedures Prepare Draft Project Report (DPR) Finalize and g bmit Project Report with Certified ED ED for Approval N . Approve Project Report s�Pr DRAFT, October 25, 2001 12 000062 X X X X X District Agreement No. 8-1173 • ATTACHMENT 2 DESIGN PHASE ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBILITY PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE LOCAL AGENCY 1. PRELIMINARY COORDINATION Request 1 - Phase EA Field Review of Site Provide Geometrics Approve Geometrics Obtain Surveys & Aerial Mapping Obtain Copies of Assessor Maps and other R/W Maps Obtain Copies of As-Builts Send Approved Geometrics to Local Agencies for Review Revise Approved Geometrics if Required Approve Final Geometrics Determine Need for Permits from other Agencies Request Permits Initial Hydraulics discussion with District Staff Initial Electrical Design discussion with District Staff Initial Traffic & Signing discussion with District Staff • Initial Landscape Design discussion with District Staff Plan Sheet Format Discussion 2. ENGINEERING STUDIES AND REPORTS Prepare & Submit Materials Report & Typical Section Review and Approve Materials Report & Typical Section Prepare & Submit Landscaping Recommendation Review & Approve Landscaping Recommendation Prepare & Submit Hydraulic Design Studies Review & Approve Hydraulic Design Studies Prepare & Submit Bridge General Plan & Structure Type Selection Review & Approve Bridge General Plan & Structure Type Selection DRAFT, October 25, 2001 • 13 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X 000063 District Agreement No. 8-1173 RESPONSIBILITY PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE LOCAL AGENCY 3. R/W ACQUISITION & UTILITIES (Used when qualified Local Agency is performing R/W activities). Request Utility Verification X Request Preliminary Utility Relocation Plans from Utilities X Prepare R/W Requirements X Prepare R/W and Utility Relocation Cost Estimates X Submit R/W Requirements & Utility Relocation Plans for Review X Review and Comment on R/W Requirements X Longitudinal Encroachment Review X Longitudinal Encroachment Application to District X Approve Longitudinal Encroachment Application X Request Final Utility Relocation Plans X Check Utility Relocation Plans X Submit Utility Relocation Plans for Approval X Approve Utility Relocation Plans X Submit Final R/W Requirements for Review & Approval X Fence and Excess Land Review X R/W Layout Review X Approve R/W Requirements X Obtain Title Reports X Complete Appraisals X Review and Approve Appraisals for Setting Just Compensation X Prepare Acquisition Documents X Acquire R/W X Open escrows and Make Payments X Obtain Resolution of Necessity X Perform Eminent Domain Proceedings X Provide Displacee Relocation Services X Prepare Relocation Payment Valuations X Provide Displacee Relocation Payments X Perform Property Management Activities X Perform R/W Clearance Activities X Prepare and Submit Certification of R/W X Review and Approve Certification of R/W X Transfer R/W to STATE X Approve and Record Title Transfer Documents X Prepare R/W Record Maps X DRAFT, October 25, 2001 0000611 14 • • District Agreement No. 8-1173 RESPONSIBILITY •ROJECT ACTIVITY STATE LOCAL AGENCY 4. PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES Prepare and Submit Preliminary Stage Construction Plans X Review Preliminary Stage Construction Plans X Calculate and Plot Geometrics X Cross -Sections & Earthwork Quantities Calculation X Prepare and Submit BEES Estimate X Put Estimate in BEES X Local Review of Preliminary Drainage Plans and Sanitary Sewer and Adjustment Details X Prepare & Submit Preliminary Drainage Plans X Review Preliminary Drainage Plans X Prepare Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans and Submit for Review X Review Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans X Prepare & Submit Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans 9 jcv$Prt X Review Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans Prepare & Submit Preliminary Electrical Plans � �� X X Review Preliminary Electrical Plans X Prepare & Submit Preliminary Signing Plans X Review Preliminary Signing Plans X Quantity Calculations X Safety Review X X Prepare Specifications X Prepare & Submit Checked Structure Plans X Review & Approve Checked Structure Plans X Prepare Final Contract Plans X Prepare Lane Closure Requirements X Review and Approve Lane Closure Requirements X Prepare & Submit Striping Plan X Review & Approve Striping Plan X Prepare Final Estimate X Prepare & Submit Draft PS&E X Review Draft PS&E X Finalize & Submit PS&E to District X DRAFT, October 25, 2001 15 000065 District Agreement No. 8-1173 ATTACHMENT 3 DEFINITIONS Basic Design Features - A general description of the facility: 1. The project proposal consists of constructing one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction on State Route 60 (SR60) from the East Junction I-215/SR60 to Redlands Boulevard (KP R19.9/32.7) in the City of Moreno Valley. Work will also be required in the communications hub located at the SR60/SR91 /I-215 interchange to connect and test the proposed communication field elements. The project includes soundwalls at various locations throughout the project limits. 2. Existing SR60 corresponds to a design speed of approximately 97 km/h, which is generally controlled by the stopping sight distance along the vertical curves. The posted speed on SR60 is 65 mph (105 km/h). The proposed improvements to SR60 do not involve realignment of the existing horizontal or vertical design. The existing design speed of Perris Boulevard 75 km/h (47 mph). The proposed improvements to Perris Boulevard do not involve realignment of the existing horizontal or vertical design. 3. Existing SR60 within the project limits is an east -west freeway with four mixed - flow lanes (two lanes in each direction). Both the eastbound and westbound roadways consist of two 3.66 -meter wide travel lanes, a 2.44 -meter wide right shoulder and a 1.52 -meter wide left shoulder. There are auxiliary lanes in both the eastbound and westbound direction between the Day Street and Frederick Street/Pigeon Pass Road interchanges. The existing median width varies from 14.02 meters to 14.63 meters and there is temporary railing (Type K) within the median. The existing right of way width is 64 meters throughout most of the project limits with short segments reducing to approximately 54 and 55 meters. The proposed median widening consists of a 1.0 -meter wide HOV buffer, a 3.6 - meter wide HOV lane, and a left shoulder varying in width from 2.9 to 3.2 -meters wide in each direction on SR60. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 16 000066 District Agreement No. 8-1173 • • • There are seven interchanges (four undercrossings and two overcrossings) within the project limits at the following locations: • Day Street Undercrossing (Bridge No. 56-477, KP 21.416) • Pigeon Pass Road Undercrossing (Bridge No. 56-478, KP 23.052) • Heacock Street Undercrossing (Bridge No. 56-420, KP 24.684) • Perris Boulevard Undercrossing (Bridge No. 56-56-421, KP 26.313) • Nason Street Overcrossing (Bridge No. 56-485, KP 29.560) • Moreno Beach Drive Overcrossing (Bridge No. 56-485, KP 30.767) There is an additional overcrossing with no freeway ramps at the following location: • Indian Street Overcrossing (Bridge No. 56-523, KP 25.513) 4. Two HOV lanes (one in each direction) are proposed within the existing median for the entire project limits. Soundwalls are proposed at various locations throughout the project limits adjacent to residential properties. It is proposed to replace the existing Perris Boulevard Undercrossing structure (Bridge Number 56-421, KP 26.31) to accommodate the HOV lanes and the future widening of Perris Boulevard. Median widening of two existing bridge structures is proposed at the Pigeon Pass Road Undercrossing (Bridge Number 56-478, KP 23.05) and the Heacock Street Undercrossing (Bridge Number 56-420, KP 24.68). A Fiber Optics Communication backbone facility is proposed from Pigeon Pass Road to Perris Boulevard (KP 23.05/26.313) It is proposed to connect existing ramp metering systems to the proposed fiber optic communications backbone at the following locations: • Heacock Street Westbound On -Ramp (KP 24.33) • Heacock Street Eastbound On -Ramp (KP 25.09) • Perris Boulevard Westbound On -Ramp (KP 25.98) DRAFT, October 25, 2001 17 000067 District Agreement No. 8-1173 It is proposed to install a new ramp metering system at the following location: • Perris Boulevard Eastbound On -Ramp (KP 26.72) It is proposed to install Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) facilities at the following locations: • Eastbound SR60 KP 21.47 • Eastbound SR60 KP 22.60 • Fnstbound SR60 KP 23.74 • Westbound SR60 KP 24.94 • Eastbound SR60 KP 25.91 It is proposed to install a changeable message sign (CMS) at the following location: • Westbound SR60 KP 24.69 It is proposed to install a traffic operations system cabinet at the following location: • Eastbound SR60 KP 26.36 5. Design exceptions are required for the following nonstandard features: Advisory Standards 1. HDM 204.3 - The following existing profile grade conditions do not meet current standards and are to be maintained. The HDM states "Minimum grades should be 0.5 % in snow country and 0.3 % at other locations . " a) An existing profile grade of 0.26% in the westbound direction between Frederick St/Pigeon Pass Rd. and Heacock St. (sta. 235+66.758 to sta. 240+39.198). b) An existing profile grade of -0.229 % between Frederick St/Pigeon Pass Rd. and Heacock St. (sta. 242+83.028 to sta. 243+28.758). c) An existing profile grade of 0.158% in the westbound direction between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (sta. 280+66.148 to sta. 283+86.188). d) An existing profile grade of 0.120% in the eastbound direction between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (sta. 281+11.868 to sta. 283+86.188). e) An existing profile grade of 0.137% in the eastbound direction between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (sta. 290+56.748 to sta. 292+09.148). DRAFT, October 25, 2001 18 000068 District Agreement No. 8-1173 • • • f) An existing profile grade of -0.200% in the eastbound direction between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (sta. 292+70.108 to sta. 293+31.068). g) An existing profile grade of -0.250% in the westbound direction between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (sta. 293+31.068 sta. 295+52.048). h) An existing profile grade of 0.296% in the eastbound direction between Moreno Beach Dr. and Redlands Blvd. (sta. 309+76.988 to sta. 311 +90.348). i) An existing profile grade of 0.130% in the westbound direction between Moreno Beach Dr. and Redlands Blvd. (sta. 311+59.868 to sta. 313+73.228). 2. HDM 302.2(1) - The following existing vertical curve length conditions do not meet current standards and are to be maintained: a) An existing vertical curve length of 182.88 m in the westbound direction between Frederick St/Pigeon Pass Rd. and Heacock St. (sta. 233+83.878 to sta. 235+66.758). b) An existing vertical curve length of 152.400 m in the eastbound direction between Frederick St/Pigeon Pass Rd. and Heacock St. (sta. 233+99.118 to sta. 235+51.518). c) An existing vertical curve length of 121.92 m between Frederick St/Pigeon Pass Rd. and Heacock St. (sta. 243+43.998 to sta. 244+65.918). d) An existing vertical curve length of 121.92 m between Heacock St. and Indian Ave. (sta. 249+99.318 to sta. 251 +21.238). e) An existing vertical curve length of 121.92 m between Indian Ave. and Perris Blvd. (sta. 258+83.238 to sta. 260+05.158). f) An existing vertical curve length of 121.92 m between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (sta. 266+14.758 to sta. 267+67.158). DRAFT, October 25, 2001 19 000069 District Agreement No. 8-1173 Mandatory Standards 1. HDM 309.2(1)(a) - Propose to maintain vertical clearances of less than 5.1 - meters at the following overcrossing structures: a) Indian Avenue Overcrossing (Bridge No. 56-523) - It is proposed to maintain the existing minimum vertical clearance of 4.744m in the westbound direction and 4.718m in the eastbound direction. b) Nason Street Overcrossing (Bridge No. 56-485) - It is proposed to provide a minimum vertical clearance of 4.798m in the westbound direction and maintain the existing minimum vertical clearance of 4.742m in the eastbound direction. c) Moreno Beach Drive Overcrossing (Bridge No. 56-486) - It is proposed to maintain the existing minimum vertical clearance of 4.959m in the westbound direction and 4.653m in the eastbound direction. 2. HDM 201.1 - Propose to maintain the following existing nonstandard vertical and horizontal stopping sight distance conditions: a) An existing 274.32m crest vertical curve on SR -60 over Frederick St. /Pigeon Pass Rd. UC provides a stopping sight distance of 175m corresponding to a speed of 95 km/h. b) An existing 365.76m crest vertical curve on SR -60 over Heacock St. UC provides a stopping sight distance of 175m corresponding to a speed of 95 km/h. c) An existing 365.76m crest vertical curve on SR -60 over Perris Blvd. UC provides a stopping sight distance of 175m corresponding to a speed of 95 1Qn/h. d) An existing 1066.722m radius horizontal curve on SR -60 east of Perris Blvd. UC provides a stopping sight distance of 200m corresponding to a speed of 103 km/h. e) An existing 152.4m sag vertical curve on SR -60 between Perris Blvd. and Nason St. (from sta. 266+14.758 to sta. 267+67.158) provides a stopping sight distance of 182m corresponding to a speed of 97.3 km/h. f) An existing 121.92m crest vertical curve on eastbound SR60 between Nason St. and Moreno Beach Dr. (from sta. 304+13.108 to sta. 305+35.028) provides a stopping sight distance of 177m corresponding to a speed of 95.7 km/h. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 20 000070 • • • District Agreement No. 8-1173 3. HDM 202.2 - Propose to maintain an existing 1.5 -percent superelevation rate for the 3047.778m radius horizontal curve at the Perris Blvd. UC, from station 260+69.2179 to station 269+20.7625. The standard superelevation rate is 2 -percent for the existing radius. 4. HDM 302.2(1) - Propose the following nonstandard cross slopes at the overcrossing bridge locations as shown in the table below. The cross slopes do not adhere to standard. Location/Bridge # Proposed Cross Scope Standard Cross Slope Indian Ave. OC/Br. No.56- 0523 (Westbound) +2% -2% Moreno Beach Dr. OC/Br. No.56-0486 (Westbound) +2% -2% 5. HDM 305.1(3)(a) - The proposed improvements will result in a nonstandard median width of 6.452 meters. The standard minimum median width is 6.6 meters. DRAFT, October 25, 2001 21 000071 AGENDA /TEI►f 1 0 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement #02-33-036, Amendment #4 to existing DMJM + HARRIS Engineering Design Contract #RO-2027, for additional Railroad Final PS&E Design Services for the Downtown Corona Metrolink Station STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Enter into Agreement # 02-33-036, Amendment #4 to existing Contract No. RO-2027, for DMJM + HARRIS to provide additional railroad survey and Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Design Services, for the proposed new Corona Main Metrolink Commuter Rail Station, for an amount not to exceed $44,337. The total value of the original contract, all amendments, this agreement and the contingency shall not exceed $1,289,337; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the November 10, 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission awarded Contract No. RO-2027 to Daniel, Mann, Johnson, & Mendenhall (DMJM) for Phase I Conceptual Studies for the proposed new Metrolink Station to be located in Downtown Corona near Main Street and Route 91 (the Project). The scope of the Phase I Studies was to encompass all the preliminary activities to develop a master plan for the development of the station, including environmental clearance, and obtain the required approvals for the proposed station site from the City of Corona, the BNSF Railroad, and all other affected agencies. The Contract for these Phase 1 services was for a base amount of $217,909, with an extra work contingency of $27,091, for a total not to exceed value of $245,000. At the December 13, 2000 Commission meeting, the Commission awarded Amendment #1 to Contract No. RO-2027 to (DMJM) for final Plans, Specification & Estimate (PS&E) Design Services for the Project. The Contract for these final PS&E design services was for a base amount of $625,000, with an extra work contingency of $75,000, for a total not to exceed value of $945,000. 000072 In May of 2001, the Executive Director authorized Amendment #2 to Contract No. RO- 2027 to (DMJM) to cover several administrative changes to the Contract, as requested by RCTC legal counsel. This was a no cost change and as such, the amended Contract total remained at a not to exceed value of $945,000. At the July 13, 2001 RCTC meeting, the Commission awarded Amendment #3 to Contract No. RO-2027 to (DMJM) for additional final design services required by RCTC to provide for the design of an expanded station, due to the purchase of an additional 1.5 acres from the City of Corona. Amendment #3 also provided for, an initial Track PS&E package for BNSF for track improvements required for the proposed station. These initial track PS&E design services were not included in DMJM's original scope of work. The Contract for these additional services was for a base amount of $238,100, with an extra work contingency of $61,900, for a total value of $300,000. This action will establish a new total not to exceed contract value of $1,245,000. At the November 14, 2001 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved Cooperative Agreement #02-33-030, with BNSF, which outlined the responsibilities of the parties for the modifications that will be required to the existing BNSF rail facilities, in order to accommodate the construction of the Project. The highlights of the agreement were as follows: 1. RCTC will fund all costs associated with the relocation of the existing Locomotive Storage Facility to the Porphyry "Y" 2. RCTC will fund all costs associated with the relocation of the existing track and the rework of existing grade crossings and signals to accommodate the construction of the proposed new Downtown Corona Metrolink Station. The total estimated costs for all of the required rail improvements to accommodate the proposed new Downtown Corona Metrolink Station is $5,200,000. The above Station Cooperative Agreement required that RCTC provide for rail improvements above that initially estimated. These additional rail improvements were not within DMJM's original scope of services. Staff subsequently requested that DMJM provide a scope of work and cost of services for the additional survey and additional PS&E Design Services. DMJM responded with the attached scope and cost estimate for the additional services. Staff is in concurrence with DMJM's proposed scope of services and the respective costs, for DMJM to provide additional railroad survey and Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Design Services, for a not to exceed amount of $44,337. The total value of the original contract, all amendments, this agreement and the contingency shall not exceed $1,289,337 The current schedule to start operation of a new Metrolink service from Riverside through Fullerton to Los Angeles is set for August 2002. The Corona Main Metrolink Station must be substantially completed by that date to accommodate the projected service start-up. The RCTC model consultant amendment agreement will be used. 000073 • • Attachment: Amendment #4 - Scope and Cost. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 01 / 02 Amount: $44,337 Source of Funds: STA & Sec. 5307 Budget Adjustment: GLA No.: 221 33 81101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11-15-01 000074 • • • IlEsoult Nc �s �C'viSED of SONTIMIN CAU OmU. 99-002-003 November 5, 2001 Mr. Roger Cunliffe-Owen Associate Vice President DMJM+HARRIS 1836A Commercenter Circle San Bernardino, CA 92408-3430 Re: Corona North Main Street Commuter Rail Station Revised Survey Services Estimate Dear Roger: At your request I have prepare the costs associated with the requested additional surveys and mapping to be performed at the Corona -North Main Street Commuter Rail Station. The costs have been revised from my previous letter dated 10/26/01 because of the additional items requested. Task 1 Topographic Surveying At -Grade Rail Crossings and Storm Drain: JOY STREET: Sub Task Fee A.1 Project Management & Coordination $764 Site visit to review site conditions. Provide coordination with the staff team and survey crews. A.2 Document Review and Research $1.024 Perform research of survey records including horizontal and vertical control and street tie information at the City and County as required. Provide one copy of material obtained to DMJM+HARRIS upon completion of work. A.3 Design Surveys $3,115 Perform field surveys on Joy Street to obtain vertical and horizontal location for any physical feature within 200 feet of the centerline of the railroad right of way. This includes both above ground and below ground facilities (with access) where appropriate. A.4 Topographic Base Map $2,777 Prepare a topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format illustrating the results of the field survey. Provide topographic base map at the scale of 1' = 40' on CD or other suitable medium. Sub Total (A.1 — A.4) $7,680 Estimated Reimbursable Expenses $ 150 .828 COMMFRCENTER CIRCLE. SAN BERNARDINO, CAUFORNW 91408.3430 Prrdve (909) 890-1255 - FAx (909) 890-0995 000075, Mr. Roger nmliffe-Owen November 5, 2001 Page 2 Total o 6,t;—)30 SHERIDAN STREET: Due to the superelevation of the tracks through the Sheridan Street crossing the scope of the design survey is increased to include all facilities within 500 feet of the centerline of the railroad right of way. Sub Task B.1 Project Management & Coordination Site visit to review site conditions. Provide coordination with the staff team and survey crews. B.2 Document Review and Research Perform research of survey records including horizontal and vertical control and street tie information at the City and County as required. Provide one copy of material obtained to DMJM+HARRIS upon completion of work. B.3 Design Surveys Perform field surveys on Joy Street to obtain vertical and horizontal location for any physical feature within 500 feet of the centerline of the railroad right of way. This includes both above ground and below ground facilities (with access) where appropriate. B.4 Topographic Base Map Prepare a topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format illustrating the results of the field survey. Provide topographic base map at the scale of 1' z 40' on CD or other suitable medium. Fee $764 $1.024 $3,843 $3.078 Sub Total (B.1 — 8.4) 58,710 Estimated Reimbursable Expenses $ 150 Total $8,860 COTA STREET Sub Task Fee C.1 Project Management & Coordination $764 Site visit to review site conditions. Provide coordination with the staff team and survey crews. C.2 Document Review and Research $1,024 Perform research of survey records including horizontal and vertical control and street tie information at the City and County as required. Provide one copy of material obtained to DMJM+HARRIS upon completion 'of work. C.3 Design Surveys $3,115 Perform field surveys on Joy Street to obtain vertical and horizontal location for any physical feature within 200 feet of the centerline of the railroad right of way. This includes both above 000076 41 • Mr. Roger Cunliff .Owen November 5. 2001 Page 3 • ground and below ground facilities (with access) where appropriate. C.4 Topographic Base Map Prepare a topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format illustrating the results of the field survey. Provide topographic base map at the scale of 1' = 40' on CD or other suitable medium. $2,777 Sub Total (C.1 — C.4) $7,680 Estimated Reimbursable Expenses $ 150 Total 57,830 AERIAL MAPPING: Sub Task D.1 Project Management & Coordination Site visit to review site conditions. Provide coordination with the staff team, survey crews and Inland Aerial Surveys. D.2 Aerial Control and Targets Perform research of survey records including horizontal and vertical control and street tie information at the City and County as required. Provide GPS controlled ground control and set aenal targets. D.3 Aerial Mapping Provide aerial mapping at a scale of 1'=40', with a contour interval of 1 foot, within the existing railroad right of way, from Main Street (where the previous topographic mapping stopped) to 1500 feet west of Cota Street. Aerial mapping shall identify all above surface features within the aerial limits, including any drainage culverts. Provide mapping in MicroStation (.dgn) format including a digital terrain model (DTM) of area to DMJM+HARRIS upon completion of work. Fee $650 $4,061 $3,400 Sub Total (D.1 — D.3) $8,111 Estimated Reimbursable Expenses $ 110 Total 68,221 000077 Mr. Roger Cunlif a -Owen November 5, 2001 Page 4 STORM DRAIN ALIGNMENT: Sub Task Fee E.1 Project Management & Coordination $614 Site visit to review site conditions. Provide coordination with the staff team and survey crews. E.2 Document Review and Research $109 Perform research of survey records including horizontal and vertical control and street tie information at the City as required. E.3 Design Surveys $2.616 Perform field surveys from the southeast comer of Blaine & Blaine (south of Burger IGng) along the toe of slope on the east side of Main Street Survey will also include information for the northeast and southeast comers of Main Street and Harrison Street. This includes both above ground and below ground facilities (with access) where appropriate. E.4 Topographic Base Map $1.976 Prepare a topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format illustrating the results of the field survey. Provide topographic base map at the scale of 1" = 40' on CD or other suitable medium. Sub Total (E.1 — E.4) 35,314 Estimated Reimbursable Expenses Total $5,364 Task 2 SURVEYS WITHIN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY OR SPUR TRACK At Joy Street: Provide topographic survey east of Joy Street within the railroad right of way for a distance of 200 feet from the east right of way of Joy Street. Survey will include drain locations, wall and other physical features. Provide topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format. Provide top of rail survey for three existing tracks from Joy Street to a distance of 1200 feet east of the east right of way of Joy Street Rail stationing will be the same as the previous rail stationing. Provide topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format. Between Cota Street and Main Street: Provide top of rail survey for two existing tracks from 500 feet west of the west right of way of Cote Street to the west side of Main Street Rail stationing will be the same as the previous rail stationing. Provide topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format 000078 • Mr. Roger Cunlit a -Owen November 5, 200I Page 5 • Ganahl Lumber: Provide topographic and top of rail survey for the one spur track that extends into the lumber storage yard on the south side of the main tracks west of the old depot. Limits of survey to be from the existing gate to the lumber facility to the end of track. Provide topographic base map in MicroStation (.dgn) format. Sub Total (Task 2) Estimated Reimbursable Expenses Total $13,972 $ 90 $14,062 The total estimated fee for the above survey services is $62,167.00. Please provide an amendment to our current contract. We can begin work within 3 days of your Notice to Proceed. Sincerely, ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Terrance A. Lane, P.E. Managing Engineer ip ERSC Scope of services for Additional Surveys 110501.doc 000079 AGENDA ITEM 11 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Budget Adjustment STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Increase the budget for equipment maintenance costs in the Motorist Assistance Department; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff is requesting a line item budget increase for equipment maintenance from $901,000 to $1,018,000 for the Motorist Assistance program. The increase is required, in part, because work on the call box upgrade project was not completed and therefore not billed until the current fiscal year. Staff had estimated that one- third of the work would be completed last fiscal year, but only about 20% of the upgrade work had been completed by June 30, 2001. In addition, the estimate for the relocation of call boxes from SR -91 to SR -86S was approximately $10,000 lower than the actual cost. Funds not expended in prior year will be used to pay for this increase. Finanrial lnfnrmatinn In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: 2001-02 Amount: $117,000 Source of Funds: DMV Fees Budget Adjustment: GLA No.: 202-45-73301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11-13-01 000080 AGENDA /TEl►f l 2 • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Regional Arterial Budget Adjustments STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Increase the expenditure budget for the Coachella Valley Regional Arterial Program by $4,800,000; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As part of the Measure calculations, 40% of the revenues received by the Coachella Valley are set aside for the Regional Arterial Program. At the beginning of the year, the cities provide CVAG an estimate of their needs and CVAG then provides that estimate which is included in the CVAG budget. The Commission has completed its FY 2000-01 annual audit and as such is ready to release the regional arterial funds that have been carried over from prior year. The amount requested covers the entire amount available. This increase will allow the cities to be reimbursed for construction projects that they have already completed. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2001/02 Amount: $4,800,000 Source of Funds: Regional Arterial Reserves GLA No. 224/72/86405 $4,800,000 Increase Budget Adjustment: Y Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11/13/01 000081. AGENDA ITEM 13 • • • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Audit Results AUDIT SUB COMMITTEEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval to: 1) Receive and file Ernst and Young's Audit reports for Fiscal Year 2000- 2001; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Ernst & Young, LLP, the Commission's independent auditors, made an oral presentation to the Audit Ad Hoc Committee on November 26, 2001. The Report covered the results of the Commission's Measure A and LTF financial statements. Staff agrees with Ernst and Young's findings and will implement the recommendations. 000082 AGENDA ITE/tI 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 26, 2001 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Darren Kettle, Director of Legislation and Intergovernmental Affairs THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transportation Commission Proposed 2001/2002 State and Federal Legislative Program STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is to seek Committee approval of: 1) The Proposed 2001/2002 Federal and State Legislative Programs; and 2) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached are the Proposed 2001-2002 Federal and State Legislative Programs for adoption. The Programs include carry-over items from prior year's legislative programs and several new initiatives. The Proposed 2001-2002 State Program includes the following new initiatives or modified policy positions: • Sponsor legislation to amend California Eminent Domain Law to more fairly set awards in eminent domain lawsuits. (State Program 4.C) • Support legislation authorizing project sponsor to complete utility relocation in connection with transportation project in the event of default or extended delay by utility. (State Program 4.D) The Federal Program remains unchanged from the version considered by the Commission in January 2001 and maintains a focus on positioning the Commission at the forefront of the initial discussions for the reauthorization of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century. While TEA -21 stretches through the 2002-03 federal fiscal year, transportation policy discussions continue to take place in Washington, D.C., and throughout the country. Staff intends to have a separate TEA -21 reauthorization program for the Commission to consider in early 2002. 00008? • r • Riverside County Transportation Commission Proposed 2001-2002 State Legislative Program OVERALL OBJECTIVES 1. Protect and enhance current funding levels for transportation programs. 2. Support increases in transportation revenues and funding sources that enhance the ability of RCTC to implement their transportation plans. 3. Maximize flexibility in the use of existing transportation revenues. 4. Streamline administrative and regulatory processes. STATE LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 1. Protect and enhance current funding levels for transportation programs. A. Support state budget and California Transportation Commission allocation to fully fund projects for Riverside County included in the State Transportation Improvement Programs and the Strategic Plan. B. Oppose any proposal that could reduce Riverside County's opportunity to receive transportation funds, including diversion of state transportation revenues for other purposes. Fund sources include, but are not limited to, the State Highway Account (SHA), Public Transit Account (PTA), and Transportation Development Act (TDA) and any ballot initiative sources. C. Support full funding regional programming process to provide for regional determination and programming for the use of all current funding sources and to provide total flexibility for all current and future STIP programs. D. Support state policies that assure timely allocation of transportation revenue, including allocations of new funds available to the STIP process as soon as they are available. E. Continue to support AB 2766 vehicle license fee funding in the South Coast Air Basin, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), to the cities and the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Committee (MSRC); support 1 `" 000084 MSRC's independence as a committee. F. Support legislation or the development of . administrative policies to allow a program credit for local funds spent on accelerating STIP projects through right-of- way purchases, or environmental and engineering consultant efforts. G. Sponsor legislation that will allow the state to advance and/or loan funding to local agencies for projects that are funded through sales tax programs but delayed due to cash flow problems. H . Support current local program funding and flexibility of the State's Transportation Demand Management program. I. Support legislation and/or budgetary actions to assure a fair share of State revenues of intercity rail (provided by Amtrak, Metrolink or other operators) funding for Southern California and Riverside County. J. Support legislation that ensures equity of benefit from the investment of State passenger rail funds to all passenger rail lines including commuter rail systems. K. Support legislative efforts to restore the ability of counties to enact or reenact local option transportation sales taxes by a simple majority vote. 2. Support increases in transportation revenues and funding sources that enhance the ability of RCTC to implement their transportation programs and plans. A. Support or seek legislation and administrative financing/programming policies and procedures to assure an identified source of funding and an equitable distribution of the funding for bus and rail services in California. B. Seek legislation to assure that dedicated state intercity rail funding is allocated to the regions administering each portion of the system and assure that funding is distributed on an equitable basis. C. Support or seek legislation to assure a dedicated source of funding, other than the State Highway Account for local street and road maintenance and repairs. D. Seek legislation to increase revenues to support the call box programs in Riverside County. E. Support legislation to provide funding for innovative, intelligent/advanced transportation, goods movement, and air quality programs which relieve congestion, improve air quality and enhance economic development. F. Support legislation creating the Passenger Rail Improvement, Safety and 2 000085 • • • • • • Modernization (PRISM) program so long as funding comes from new sources of revenue. 3. Maximize flexibility in the use of existing transportation revenues. A. Seek a fair share for and Riverside County of any state discretionary funding made available for transportation grants or programs. B. Support legislation to ensure that funding for transit operations is commensurate with existing and new demands placed on public transit by air quality and congestion management programs, Ca1WORKS (welfare to work reform) the American with Disabilities Act, including the use of social service funding sources. C. Support income tax benefits or incentives that encourage use of alternative fuel vehicles and alternative modes of transportation without reducing existing transportation funding levels. D. Monitor and, where appropriate, support studies of market -based pricing measure to relieve traffic congestion, improve air quality or fund transportation alternatives. E. Support legislation to finance cost effective conversion of public transit and paratransit fleets to alternative fuels. 4. Streamline administrative and regulatory processes. A. Support legislation and/or administrative reforms to enhance Caltrans project delivery, such as simultaneous Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and engineering studies, and a reasonable level of contracting out of appropriate activities to the private sector. B. Support legislation to make the process for determining unmet transit needs a biennial action. C. Sponsor legislation to amend California Eminent Domain Law to more fairly set awards in eminent domain lawsuits. D. Support legislation authorizing project sponsor to complete utility relocation in connection with transportation project in the event of default or extended delay by utility. 3 000086 • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Proposed 2001-2002 Federal Legislative Program OVERALL OBJECTIVES 1. Protect and enhance current funding levels for transportation programs. 2. Protect and enhance flexibility in use of transportation revenue. 3. Reduce or eliminate costly and duplicative administrative and regulatory requirements. FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 1. Protect and enhance current funding levels for transportation programs. A. Support efforts to bring transportation appropriations to authorized levels. B. Seek a fair share for Riverside County of any federal funding made available for transportation programs and projects. C. Support legislation to secure adequate budget appropriations for highway, bus, rail, air quality and mobility programs in Riverside County. D. Support continued Federal commitment of funds to support public transit, to assure that California and the western states receive a fair share of the AMTRAK funding resources as compared to the North East Corridor. E. Seek specialized funding for goods movement projects of international and national significance that are beyond the funding ability or responsibility of local and state transportation programs and budgets. F. Seek funding for airport ground access and other airport development needs in Riverside County. 2. Protect and enhance flexibility in use of transportation revenue. A. Support legislation that will modify federal project development requirements for transit projects to make them more consistent with the process employed for highway projects. 1 ;O.QOCg$7 B. Support legislation to exempt commuter rail services operating within existing railroad right-of-way from federal new start and alternative analysis requirements in order to utilize federal funding. C. Support efforts to pursue funds to facilitate timely conversion of public sector fleets to alternative fuels to meet federal fleet conversion mandates. D. Support tax benefits and/or incentives for transportation demand management programs and alternative fuel programs to promote the use of alternate modes of transportation. E. Support increased federal funding for Alameda Corridor improvements in Los Angeles County and Alameda Corridor East improvements in Riverside County and increase opportunities for Riverside County to access these funding sources. Seek continued federal funding of Maritime Administration studies focusing on an "Inland Rail Port" in Riverside County. F. Support legislation that ensures coordination of transportation and social service agency funding (i.e. Departments of Aging, Rehabilitation, and Welfare). G. Support legislative or administrative policies that promote a "regional" approach to airport development and usage of Southern California Logistics, San Bernardino International, and Ontario International airports and the March Joint Use Airport. 3. Reduce or eliminate costly and duplicative administrative and regulatory requirements. A. Support administrative or legislative action to ensure consistency among the Federal congestion management and the State's Congestion Management Program requirements. B. Monitor and, where appropriate, support studies of market -based pricing measures to relieve traffic congestion, improve air quality and/or fund transportation alternatives. C. Seek Federal authorization allowing states, where appropriate to pursue options to privatize various aspects of transportation to increase the efficiencies and effectiveness of their available resources through private sector participation. D. Due to the elimination of Federal transit operating subsidies, support legislation to also eliminate Federal requirements and regulations regarding transit operations. 2 00008'8 • 1 • E. Support legislation and/or administrative reforms to enhance Caltrans project delivery, such as simultaneous Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and engineering studies, and a reasonable level of contracting out of appropriate activities to the private sector. F. Support legislation and/or administrative reforms that result in cost savings to environmental clearance processes for transportation construction projects. G. Continue to streamline federal reporting/monitoring requirements to ensure efficiency and usefulness of data collected and eliminate unnecessary and/or duplicative requirements. 3 000080