Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPCM 2011-04-27DATE: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 MEETING: Planning Commission Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT Board: Staff: Others: 3. Open Forum: FRASER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Commissioners: Chair; Philip Naill, Fran Cook, Veronica Callinan absent, Katie Soles, Vesta Shapiro, Steve Sumrall and Jean Wolter Town Planner, Catherine Trotter; Town Clerk, Lu Berger, Town Manager Jeff Durbin See attached list Chairperson Naill called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. 1. Roll Call: 2. Approval of Agenda: Minutes of March 23, 2011. Commissioner Soles moved, and Commissioner Wolter seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 6 -0. Carol Sidofsky was disappointed the Commissioners approved the minutes. She asked greater detail be included in the minutes. 4. Public Hearing and Possible Action Regarding: a. Byers Peak Ranch Planned Development District Plan Parts of Sections 19 and 20, Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6 PM, County of Grand, State of Colorado, Applicant Byers Peak Properties, LLC. Commissioner Soles moved, and Commissioner Cook seconded the motion to open the continued public hearing on the Byers Peak Ranch Planned Development District Plan Parts of Sections 19 and 20 Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6 PM County of Grand, State of Colorado Applicant Byers Peak Properties, LLC. Motion carried: 6 -0. Proof of publication was provided. TP Trotter briefed the Commission on the history of the Byers Peak Ranch Planned Development District Plan Parts of Sections 19 and 20 Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6 PM County of Grand, State of Colorado Jack Bestall addressed the Commission on the changes made to the plan since the prior Planning Commission meeting on March 23, 2011. Commissioner Sumrall asked where the ponds would drain; Mr. Bestall stated they would drain to Elk Creek. How long would the gravel operation last? Mr. Bestall did not have a specific time frame available. Until a more detailed design is available this question cannot be answered. Commissioner Soles asked where the set back begins for the property. Setbacks begin at the applicant's property line. Building heights in Planning Area One need to be evaluated 45' high; 30' back is too close. What is the percentage of open space for the project? Mr. Bestall, 20 Each planning area will have its own component. Commissioner Wolter questioned the placement of a utility easement on the property. Parkway brought to grade and paved? Mr. Bestall stated as development occurs, yes. Commission Cook asked about the location of the pedestrian trail. Mr. Bestall stated it would be a new trail that would tie to the parkway. Commissioner Shapiro is concerned with the amount of density in the plan. Mr. Bestall stated it is hard to predict based on the economic climate. Letters from the public were read into the record. County Commissioner Newberry County Planner Manguso answered questions regarding existing County zoning and allowed density. Density would be determined by going through the County process, as the applicant is currently doing with the Town of Fraser. Public Comment was taken from: Jane Mather Jay Clough Carol Sidofsky Pat Rupert Laura Barnhart Dennis Finnegan Greg McFadden Dave Hazelrigg Patty Sue "Motor" Coulson Dave Lively Jamie Wolter The Commissioners came up with a list of concerns they would like the applicant to address in more detail prior to the May 25, 2011 meeting. Time parameters of gravel operations and management plan Drainage plans, opening culverts Height restrictions Open Space percentage Setbacks, horizontal vertical Reference the PDD regulations Traffic /roads Trail details Show all existing easements Maintenance facility Commissioner Wolter moved, and Commissioner Shapiro seconded the motion to continue the public hearing on the Byers Peak Ranch Planned Development District Plan Parts of Sections 19 and 20 Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6 PM Page 2 of 3 Page3of3 County of Grand, State of Colorado Applicant Byers Peak Properties, LLC. until the May 25 meeting. Motion carried: 6 -0. 5. Discussion: a. Code Amendments continued until the May 25 meeting. 6. Staff Choice: Planner Special meeting on May 11 7. Planning Commission Choice: Commissioner Soles moved, and Commissioner Shapiro seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 6 -0. Meeting adjourned 9:35 p.m. Lu Berger, Town z w w LL J F- w Z Ce Z z ON co (o Q cn O w U OC Z Z J a 0 N N a1 C E. 0 E NI- N 'x ai 2 -N. E u E Q a 'a m L c c0 m o'aa)= v off .0 c 3 a) 0)c m 1- a d .a+ O a 0 0 a A F; N 1 2•E o y C 0 i 0) t 0) 0 C E tr.. te a) c 2 E c0 CLI O i O u_ a) .r 0 i 3 N N 0 i =oa� ca N 0= f 0 L d 0) t) E O O N L V c.) a) .0 co 4- 'a L N'a 0 c 3 E 0 d O a) d -a.= a) a; d O 0- 0(aa) a. El ca 0 a.0c d a) W O 0 t N N d -w E 3 o 0 a) O 0) d .Y c. C 3 ca t O O C a d ca co) ca 3 a m .y E .0 0 o O 0'3 co O V a) L O u a1 Q 0 a) 0 a) CU i ,Q CL m- F 4 N U .1 Q W z j\ N kLA 0) •V L