Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutP&RAC Minutes 1993 05/01PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 1, 1993 I. ROLL CALL AND CALL TO ORDER. Chair Grote called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Committee members Martens, Killen, and Coyle answered the roll call. Chair declared a quorum present. Also attending was Director Baker and Ron White - Footloose. II. FOOTLOOSE PARK RESERVATIONS - RON WHITE Mr. White distributed the 1993 Footloose venue (attached). Mr. White informed the committee that Footloose was going to be greatly expanded this year and would include a mountain bike race sanctioned by the National Off Road Bicycle Association (Brundage Mountain), a Juice Newton Concert (rodeo grounds), a power boat poker run (Payette Lake), a teen dance (high school), a Motor Cross race (snowmobile track), a roller blade demo, live music in Mill Park on the 13th, 14th, and 15th from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. with a $7.50 entry fee to get into the park, a sand sculpting contest (Legacy Park), a volleyball tournament (Legacy Park and Mill Park), and a softball tournament (Fairway Park). Committee discussed the effect of reserving three of the city's parks at the same time. In addition, committee discussed problems associated with parking, restrooms, adjoining property owners, the moving of sand for the sculpting contest, and the advantages of charging a flat fee vs. % of gross. After reviewing the July 20, 1992 meeting minutes concerning the reservation of Mill Park for the Toys for Tots Battle of the Bands, Killen moved to recommend council issue a special use permit for the reservation of Legacy Park, Mill Park, and Fairway Park on August 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th, 1993 for Footloose after the following conditions have been met: 1. No vehicles will be allowed into Mill Park and permission of the landowner to the East (Manchester) will need to be obtained for park access. 2. All adjacent landowners be contacted in advance of council approval. 3. A written parking plan, alcohol plan, and crowd control plan be approved by Police Chief Parker through a memo to Administrator. 4. A minimum of two (2) portable toilets be provided. 5. Trash will not be evident at any time. 6. Mill Park, Legacy Park and Fairway Park will be returned to their original or better condition. 7. Mr. Gillespie is to be notified prior to Council approval. 8. A fee of $1500.00 and a refundable damage deposit of $750.00 is paid. 9. Booth numbers be limited to seven (7) in Mill Park. Coyle seconded, and the motion carried. III. MINUTES - JANUARY 18, 1993. After discussion, Coyle moved to accept the January 18, 1993 minutes as written, seconded by Martens and the motion carried. IV. STAFF REPORTS A. Recreation Director Director Baker informed the committee that both the motion to have background checks done on volunteer coaches and to adopt the comprehensive plan were approved by council as written. In addition, Director Baker informed the committee that the Recreation Program has received a grant from The American League of Professional Baseball Clubs of $2000.00 to purchase two pitching machines. Committee discussed the need for electricity at Fairway Park to operate the pitching machines and chair with consent of committee directed staff to contact Idaho Power to discover the costs involved. V. NEW BUSINESS A. Fund Raising Subcommittee - Grote & Martens. Committee discussed the memo from the Star News to Mayor Smith (attached). Grote informed the committee the there has been no reply form the Mayor at this time and the Ice Breakup contest has been granted to the Payette Lakes Trail System task force for a fund raiser in 1993. VI. MASTER PLAN A. Mission Statement, Objectives, and Strategies (attached). After discussion Killen moved to recommend council adopt the mission statement, * * * * * objectives, and strategies as written, Martens seconded and the motion carried. B. Draft: site specific recommendations. Chair Grote informed the committee that she had reviewed the minutes including park tours and made a draft list of site specific recommendations (attached), and would like the committee to review these and be ready to complete the list at their next meeting. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Golf cart storage fees - Scott & Baker Director Baker informed the committee that he had contacted Centennial Cart Storage which is run by the City of Nampa and discovered that they charge $225.00 dollars per year to store golf carts. After discussion of last year's golf cart storage fees Coyle moved to recommend council raise 1993 fees to $150.00 per year for inside storage and $100.00 per year for outside covered * * * * * storage, expenses to be paid by lessee, seconded by Martens and the motion carried. B. Waterways Improvement Fund Grants - Coyle. Coyle informed the committee that after talking with the Idaho Parks and Recreation personnel in charge of Waterways Grants that the possibility to receive a grant for swim buoys would be slim at best. After discussion, committee decided not to apply for a grant. C. Park Reservation System - Coyle & Baker Director Baker informed the committee that after reviewing the city's current system and the State Parks system, the biggest issue that needs to be resolved is how the policy is to be enforced. Committee members noted the increase in reservations requests and noted several issues —including enforcement —they thought the reservations policy should resolve: •PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC ACCESS. Committee feels that with the number of events now seeking to control admission to the parks, public access is likely to be threatened in the near future. Guidelines need to be established for each park, perhaps limiting the number of days in the season and the length of time each park can be closed to the public and what kinds of controlled admission uses (fund- raising, for profit, etc.) are appropriate. Some parks, such as Legacy, should never be totally closed to the public. Committee also feels that courtesy signs notifying the public that a park will be closed for an event should be posted at that park's entrances at least 7 days in advance of the event. •RESERVATION ADMINISTRATION. Currently there is no method in place to notify the public that an area has been reserved for a private use, such as a wedding. Committee members are concerned about the friction that has happened in the past when a reservation holder with no official city designation has had to clear the public from the reserved area himself. Committee feels that once a reservations policy is in place, there should be staff to enforce it. A city staffer should be assigned to keep the list of reservations, post signage and clear the public from a reserved area just prior to the event, and inspect the area following the event. •FEE STRUCTURE. Committee members discussed a tiered fee structure that takes into account the nature of the use (profit, non-profit, size of event etc.) and the residence of the user or beneficiary (city versus non -city) •CONDITIONS FOR USE. Committee discussed classifying reserved uses into two categories, characterized by the size of the event and then drafting a list of conditions of use for each. For the large event class, committee recommends using the conditions placed on Footloose (refer to item II on this agenda) as the model for a list of requirements to be modified as needed for each park site. " APPLICATIONS. Committee wants applicants coming before the park board to present a written proposal prior to being listed on the park board's agenda, describing the nature of the event and plans for satisying the conditions for use An application form should be developed to assist the applicant in answering the questions asked most commonly by the park board. Committee discussed where the responsibility would best fall to enforce the reservations policy and noted that enforcement would be best achieved through coordination between the city's public works and recreation departments. Committee member Coyle suggested that the board conduct a public hearing on the reservations policy. Chair Grote said that she didn't think that was necessary, but that a request to the council for funds to advertise committee discussion of the policy prior to recommending it to the council might be in order. Committee also enquired as to where the rental fees for parks go and asked Baker to find out. After discussion, chair with consent of committee asked Director Baker to meet with Administrator Schmidt and Public Works/Parks Director Keating to draft a policy that reflects the committees comments and report back to the committee at its next meeting. D. Donation Needs Catalog - Grote Chair deferred the donation needs catalog to the July meeting, after park site specifics are approved. E. Re -scheduling of research projects - Grote. After discussion committee agreed on the following schedule. March - New Recreation Programs(attached questionnaire) - Coyle & Baker Club McCall Card - Martens, Coyle, & Baker April --- Concessions in parks - Killen & Grote May ---- Fund raising Subcommittee - Grote & Martens June --- Park funding through special taxes - Coyle July ---- Donation needs catalog - Grote F. Bike Path Grant Killen and Grote expressed concern and disappointment that the park board had not been notified about the bike path grant being accepted. Grote asked Baker to find out why city officials didn't feel such notification was important and to get copies of the full grant application to all board members. VIII. PAYETTE LAKES TRAIL SYSTEM REPORT Killen informed the committee that the Ice Breakup contest had been offered to the Payette Lakes Trail System committee and they accepted it as a fund raiser for one year. IX. OTHER BUSINESS A. Ponderosa State Park General Development Plan. Coyle informed the committee that the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation was looking for as many comments on the general development plan as possible, because it will go the state parks board in April. In addition, Coyle gave a broad overview of what is in the general development plan and informed the committee that there are three areas on which that the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation would like to see the City of McCall comment: 1. The amount and types of day uses for Lakeview Village 2. Ingress and egress to Ponderosa Park. 3. The North Beach plan. Grote said that she would solicit comments from committee members and write a letter on behalf of the committee to the State Department of Parks and Recreation. X. NEXT MEETING March 15, 1993 - 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers. VENUE ACTIVITY LEGACY PARK SAND SCULPTURES VOLLEYBALL 3 DAYS - 13TH, 14TH AND I5TH MILL PARK. CONCERTS VOLLEYBALL 4 DAYS - 12TH, 13TH, 14TH AND 15TH BALLFIELDS SOFTBALL 3 DAYS - 13TH, 14TH AND 15TH McCall Dept. of Parks and Recreation Tomi Grote, chair • Members: Dennis Coyle, Kathy Killen, Dean Martens, Malcolm Scott To: Larry Smith, mayor Re: Ice Breakup parks fund raiser Date: February 4, 1993 A few weeks ago, I told you about a fund raising idea for the parks I've had for the last several years. You requested an outline. Several years ago, The Star -News took over the promotion called Ice Breakup when the precursor to the present KMCL closed. Because of the sparse time of year that the contest runs, it appears to reap very little benefit for the merchants who sponsor it. Even though we manage to sell many more sponsorships than the old radio station did, and we do turn a small profit at it, we at The Star -News believe that Ice Breakup would soar as a betting game where it barely gets off the ground as a for - profit promotion. In the middle part of the century, when gambling was legal in Idaho, the McCall Chamber of Com- merce sponsored the contest. I've heard that during those years, the contest was so successful, the Chamber was able to give away a car as a prize —no small potatoes in the fifties. Gambling was later outlawed, and due to lack of profitable interest, the chamber gave up the contest to the local radio station. Ice Breakup is a cherished and colorful community tradition that we have every reason to believe would reignite as a non-profit fund raiser pemussable under the state's lottery laws, similar to the calcuttas sponsored by the men's golf association and the Payette Lakes Ski Club. The business community would be more forthcoming if the money goes to a popular cause: the city's parks, rather than into the coffers of a business. I see the wager period running from Christmas, when the lake is usually frozen and there are a lot of people in town, to March loth, when the barrel would be transported by helicopter to roughly the center of the pool at the south end of Payette Lake's big arm and dropped. The barrel would be rigged with a radio security system of some kind that would trip an alarm at the police dispatch office if it moves a significant distance, signalling that it's afloat or that someone is trying to tamper with it (this security measure will be necessary if and when a lot of prize money becomes involved. Such a trip mechanism is not difficult to do, I'm told). This contest period encompasses our four peak winter tourist periods: the holidays, Martin Luther King Day, Winter Carnival and Presidents' weekend. I believe merchants —especially those who are already set up for the lottery —would be happy to sell Ice Breakup bets, and we could operate a booth staffed by volunteers during Winter Carnival to sell wagers. If the contest receives broad tourist participation, I envision the outcome becoming a newsworthy event in nearby media markets, bringing the added benefit of free publicity to McCall. Here are what I believe are the major points for you to consider: • I suggest the city attorney scope the legal aspects of the contest. Does it fit under lottery laws, what are the liabilities of running such a contest and if an independent contractor is considered, what kind of language should be built in to shield the city from liabilities resulting in the unlikely events of poor management, contest default, etc. I think Ice Breakup clearly fits into the legal description of a game of skill because bettors use past records and current wisdom to place their wagers. " I believe that a promotion of this scope will only get off the ground if the city hires a contractor to institute and manage it. The park committee's master plan has not been approved at this writing, but the draft does call for the creation of a fund-raising subcommittee to the park board. This subcom- mittee would interview contract applicants and make recommendations to the park board who would in turn recommend to the city council. " I suggest that the contract specs guarantee a flat fee to administer the contest and promote it (the bidder can underbid that if he wants), plus a percentage of the total wager with the flat fee sub- tracted. In exchange for being listed as the contest's official sponsor, the Star -News would be willing to cover a set amount of the flat fee to reduce the financial liability to the city. " It is possible that the state lottery commission might be interested in handling the contest, but I don't think the marketing potential is big enough to get their attention. It doesn't ever hurt to ask, however. If you wish, I will be happy to approach a friend of mine on the commission. I would not be willing to waste his time, though, until I sense you and the council have a serious interest in this idea and have invested some considerable discussion about it. There is no question in my mind that if I were the contractor, I could run the contest to my profit and to the city's. Of course I have a conflict of interest that prevents me from bidding, but I want you to know that I believe so much in the potential, I would be a bidder if that conflict didn't exist. Please kick this thing around and if legal counsel sees avenues to get it done, I would be happy to mold this mere exploration of the idea into a concrete proposal for you to consider. My only bottom line is this: if we create it and it's as successful as I think it will be, the proceeds have to be dedicated exclusively to McCall's parks and recreation budget. I will insist on language that restricts the use of the funds to satisfy the park board's wish list for park amenities according to our master plan, not for the taxpayer's fair share for salaries and infrastructure. As with the bed -and -booze tax, if we sell this fund raiser as something to accelerate park development and the public sees its basic park budget leaking into the general fund, this promotion will die just like bed and booze did. I also think that the success of the contest depends on a list being presented to the public throughout the contest of attractive amenities the money will buy . As the pot grows, we can report more and more of the wish list being satisfied. That will stimulate the participation of park lovers who might not normally play the lottery. I will look forward to hearing your opinion of this idea. Respectfully submitted, To. Grote Chair cc. Craig Baker, members: Park & Rec Advisory Committee McCall Dept. of Parks and Recreation li nti Grote, chair • Members: Dennis Coyle, Kathy Killen, Dean Martens, Malcolm Scott To: Park Board Re: Master Plan status 1/18/93 Date: January 22, 1993 I have revised the master plan according to my notes of our discussion at our January 18th meeting. I also drafted the strategies to the last three objectives so that we can discuss them at our February meeting. I'm hopeful that we can move to accept this document at the February meeting. That will conclude the formation of the philosophical platform of our plan and we can move on to setting a site specific action plan which we will then prioritize into a measurable time line. The staff can take over the document at that point and ready a final draft for our approval at our March meeting. Prior to sending the finished draft to the council, I would like to see us open a 30 day comment period in which the draft is mailed to all the interested parties we can think of. At the same time I will commit to write a Viewpoint for The Star -News that summarizes the plan and invites comment on it. At our April meeting, we will take up the comments, notice the meeting by mail to all those who submitted comments and make agreed upon revisions. I look for the final draft to be submitted to the city council sometime in June. It's an ambitious schedule, I know. But I think you all share my desire to get this philosophical road map in place so that we can start using all this good work in our decision -making process. Even though you already passed judgment on the bulk of it, I ask you to re -read the entire document as if you've read it for the first time. I have not rewritten, but substantially revised and rearranged it since our January 18th meeting. I was careful to adhere to my notes on your comments and stay within the spirit of them, but when I completed the last three objectives and viewed the document as a whole, there were still too many reiterations of the same thoughts and a general lack of organiza- tion. I rearranged the objectives into the three main categories of thought that they address, which helped me see the duplications and view each body of thought individually. I think this approach will help you all to channel your thinking into whether or not we've adequately covered an area, rather than whether we've fully described strategies to an objective (which most often caused the duplication). By the way, this heirarchy was blessed by Bud. Our guiding light is a mission statement under which there are objectives and under those there are strategies. Master Plan Draft as of 1/18/93 Mission Statement: The city of McCall will provide a package of park and recreation amenities that contributes to the health and well-being of its citizens by inviting them to adopt an active life style and at the same time attracts visitors to the city. Objectives CONCERNING PARK DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE I. Develop a variety of community park and recreation sites that guarantee a high quality of life consistent with the wishes of the citizens of the City of McCall. II. Develop, maintain, improve and expand accesses and views to guarantee public access to Payette Lake, Payette River and natural assets within the City of McCall. III. Encourage use of park and recreation facilities by providing a trail network which links McCall's park and recreation facilities. IV. Provide safe, accessible, well maintained and efficiently administered park and recreation facili- 26 BELMAN Continued from page 22 There are noticeable improve- ments to the lands under their management. The Hillmans have assisted riparian area recovery by creating alternative water sources for the cows at 72 springs and 18 ponds. Woody vegetation has grown back along streambanks. Wanting more scientific proof of the change, they hired a fish biologist to develop a monitoring program, and, after seven years of gathering data, Mike says it is fun to see the results of their efforts. He admits, though, that some effects, such as sedimentation in the streambeds, is not improving as rapidly as they had hoped. He partially attributes this to low water years that have not provided the flushing action needed to move the sediment. One of the biggest improve- ments the Hillmans have witnessed is in the overall condition of the range. Areas that some range conservationists thought would never recover are now producing desirable forage species. Mike credits these successes to a rigid program of resting and rotating pastures. With this practice, pastures are grazed in the spring one year and in the fall the next, allowing the grass to recover between grazing. It means moving the cows frequently. The Hillmans' way of life provides many opportunties for friendships. Last year nearly 400 hunters visited the Hillman Ranch. Their gracious, open style makes people feel at home, as does their sign at the front gate that welcomes visitors and sober hunters. After a stop at their ranch, many people consider them friends and look forward to their next visit. Mike and Peggy say they can see the change in people after only a short stay. Public perception of grazing and the movement to see cattle off the National Forest has the Hillmans worried. They've shown it is possible to graze cattle without long- term harm to the rangelands and riparian areas. Mike does not consider their land stewardship practices an exception among grazing permittees. He believes the land abusers are the exception, and when the Forest Service tolerates bad practices, it reflects on all grazing permittees. The Forest Service must have the backbone to enforce its own rules and regulations if they want to continue to be good neighbors and partners with people like the Hillmans. pic of Hillman with dogs �1 GIS Continued from page 25 information currently stored in computer data bases, especially timber inventory data, is compatible and can be brought directly into the GIS. The missing link is telling the computer the location of those acres. Some data entry can be accomplished using a digitizer (an electronic sensing devise that is passed over a map to record dis- tances). Digitizing is painstaking work, and its accuracy can be lost with the slightest arm jerk. Another method is an electronic scanner that takes a picture of an area and converts the picture into information the computer can re-create. Getting all the resource layers of informa- tion, such as vegetation, landtypes, roads, for an area the size and complexity of the Payette National Forest is not -151ban easy endeavor. Dave Thom, who works with the roadless area timber sale group, has been conducting a personal cam- paign for GIS on the Payette Forest. Initially, he spent many of his off - work hours researching and experi- menting. So far, with less than ideal conditions, Thom has demonstrated the usefulness of GIS with the Deep/ Copper timber sale analysis and is presently building the data base for the French Creek/Patrick Butte timber sales. Thom's pioneering work has Payette employees excited about GIS, and he's overwhelmed with requests with other projects. tract, which will include a GIS. The objective is to have a network system that will allow global access to the resource information of all national forests. As envisioned, the Chiefs Office in Washington D.C. could access resource information down to the district -ranger level through the linked system. Research, evaluation, and negotiation of such a large contract is a slow process and is leaving forests, like the Payette, in a difficult position. The need for GIS is apparent and immediate. The Payette may find that it can't wait and must move ahead of the na- tional contract and with the hope that the information they gather and the equipment they purchase will be compatible with the national stan- dards and contract. The Forest Service dia recognizes GIS as a ti �'� Lg v valuable land management tool. '01°- �r--„` k k, l.Pe The agency is currently revis- �` o� dco A ing its nationwide computer con- tc' ties. V. Minimize use conflicts in the city's parks. VI. Develop a partnership with private, local, state & federal recreation providers in order to avoid duplication of services. CONCERNING RECREATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE VII. Promote, develop and implement year-round community recreation programs. VIII. Sponsor and administer recreation programs that use role models to encourage responsible behavior by youths. CONCERNING FEES AND FUNDING IX: Recognize that parks and recreation facilities and services are valuable to the citizens of McCall and that profitability is only one consideration in evaluating those programs, facilities and services. THIS IS A RESTATEMENT OF THIS OBJECTIVE TO EXPRESS THE THOUGHT, BUT NOT SOUND SO NEGATIVE. X. Recognize that there is a serious disparity in who pays for parks and recreation services in McCall and who uses parks and recreation in McCall. Attempt to find a way to balance the burden. THIS IS A NEW OBJECTIVE THAT REPRESENTS AN ISSUE I DEEPLY BELIEVE MUST BE RE- SOLVED IN THE NEXT 5 YEARS. CONCERNING PARK DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OBJECTIVE 1: Develop a variety of community park and recreation sites that guarantee a high quality of life consistent with the wishes of the citizens of the City of McCall. Strategies 1. Provide high quality public tennis courts, playfields and trail networks. 2. Expand offerings and facilities in existing park and recreation sites. Areas that need attention include expanded parking, equipment storage, signing, access, playground structures, indoor recre- ation opportunities and restrooms. 3. Prioritize the future development of public park sites. Parks should serve the broadest cross- section of citizen interests possible and serve the needs of significant segments of the population. 4. Commit to future construction that is of commercial standard. Wherever aesthetic considerations are not an overriding factor, park designs should favor low maintenance features and vandal resistant equipment. 5. Annually assess all current sites and determine the following: a. project costs and personnel required to upgrade these sites to a more functional level. Priority should be given to improving existing sites before developing new ones. b. existing park/recreation services, facilities and operational procedures. Adjustments should be made based on changing needs of the community. 6. Encourage the adoption of ordinances that ensure adequate parks, open spaces and bikeways be provided in newly developed areas in the city of McCall to meet the recreational needs of increased populations. 7. Recognize that recreational services or sites often stimulate the local economy enough to help offset operating/administration costs. 8. Support the preservation of natural drainages, wildlife habitat and unique areas within the city when prudent and encourage developers to preserve natural areas rather than relandscaping them, especially in the case of side hills, property borders and irregular land parcels, which are easy to leave natural. OBJECTIVE II. Develop, maintain, improve and expand accesses and views to guarantee public access to Payette Lake, Payette River and natural assets within the City of McCall. Strategies 1. Improve existing facilities on Payette Lake to include: a. Better access from both land and water b. Adequate parking ANNUAL REPORT �fv� f :: F.vl.��ir: i::•�. ----dike most ranching families, the Hillmans are private, independent people. Hillman knew he was giving up some of his families' privacy by accepting the Forest Service Chiefs Annual Out -Service Award for Outstanding Achievement in Range Management to share their suc- cesses. oii Hillman was raised on a ranch in San Diego County. As a husband and father, he found himself unable to meet his family's needs on a ranch hand's salary and was forced to find another occupation. Family ties led him to the oil industry, "To the Hillman family, For extraordinary effort and accomplishment in Coordinated Resource Management, restoring productivity to private, state, and federal lands associated with the Heath -Dukes C&H Allotment, Weiser Ranger District, Payette National Forest." where he made a lucrative income as an oil well servicing contractor based in Bakersfield, California. But his heart was still on the ranch. Each Sunday, Mike and his oldest son would buy a ranch out of the Los Angles Times. Finally, in 1980 his dream became reality, and Mike and his wife, Peggy, moved their family to a ranch in Idaho. There the Hillmans found rangeland suffering from nearly a century of overgrazing. Since that time, many changes have occurred on the former Boyd and Fairchild ranches, now known as the Hillman Family Ranch. The ranch sits about 20 miles west of Cambridge, Idaho, on the rim of Brownlee Reservoir on the Snake River. The Hillmans graze 750 head of cattle on about 9,000 acres of private land, 23,000 acres of National Forest System land, 10,000 acres of State of Idaho land, and 2,000 acres of Bureau of Land Manage- ment land. This checkerboard ownership is managed under a Coordinated Resource Management Plan with an advisory committee of resource managers. How- ever, as Mike says, "We manage it all as if it was our own." In the case of the Hillmans, that means applying a land - management ethic that has to be ad- mired. You would think that working with such a snarl of bureaucracy would be frustrating. But, like many aspects of Mike's life, he'd rather focus on the benefits, which includes the wealth of knowledge he has available to him. Continued on page 26 c. Safety for users d. Site amenities including restrooms, tables, benches, informational signs, landscaping. 2. Encourage the establishment of common rules with other governing agencies to foster a unified approach to waterway development. 3. Provide Payette Lake facilities with designated areas for boaters and swimmers to better balance use and safety. a. Ski docks b. Signing c. Fishing access areas d. Moorage/short term storage e. Public boat launch sites f. Buoyed swimming areas 4. Develop facilities for better use of Payette River. a. Pathways b. View Points c. Fishing access areas 5. Encourage float boating access to Payette River with a put -in near the dam and take-out down river. Include informational signing with safety recommendations. 6. Evaluate the impacts of managing Payette River flows to allow recreational floaters to use the river for an extended season and when prudent, encourage such management. 7. Improve and protect existing park lands along Payette Lake and Payette River and acquire addi- tional public lands on all McCall's waterways by donation, trade, purchase, property or access rights. OBJECTIVE III. Encourage use of park and recreation facilities by providing a trail network which links McCall's park and recreation facilities. Strategies 1. A trail system should serve in getting from point-to-point, park -to- park, for transportation within -- the city, and for ingress to and egress from the city. The system should be a useful link between facilities: private, public and academic. It should link neighborhoods with the commercial core of the city; 2. The design of the trail system should incorporate the use conflict strategies in objective IX. 3. Waterfront shoreline and views should be incorporated, wherever available, into the trail system. 4. Vest pocket parks and natural areas should be incorporated along the trail system. 5. Develop minimum standard (Class 3) bikeways to link areas wherever construction of a 10 foot wide trail is not practical. OBJECTIVE IV: Provide safe, accessible, well maintained and efficiently administered park and recreation facilities. Strategies 1. Analyze the safety and access features of current park designs and make recommendations to city council on prudent improvements. Encourage prompt corrections to those deficiencies. 2. Comply with the provisions of the American Disabilities Act and require that the provisions of the act be incorporated into any new park design. 3. Be reasonably assured that adequate future funding for maintenance will exist prior to expanding park and recreation sites. 4. Require that new facilities be visually appealing, but constructed for low -maintenance and of vandal resistant materials. 5. Require private and civic organizations to seek city government input and assistance prior to petitioning the parks & recreation advisory committee to donate or build public recreation facilities. 6. Require that projects slated for donation: a. Be feasible and desirable to the city. b. Be completed in accordance with a pre -agreed time table. c. Be constructed of commercial/industrial grade materials. d. Be completely operable before acceptance by the city. 7. Improve the monitoring of park maintenance by annually requiring the city staff to prepare a written evaluation of park maintenance programs. The plan should include a detail of tasks, stan- dards, schedules and responsibilities to address deficiencies. The report will be submitted to the committee in April of each year so that the committee can consider the information in it's budget requests relative to park maintenance. 8. Establish a system to encourage and evaluate maintenance suggestions by city employees and citizens. OBJECTIVE V: Minimize use conflicts in the city's parks. Strategies 1. Design parks that a. segregate incompatible recreational uses. b. are sensitive to the existing uses of adjacent land. c. minimize conflicts in modes of transportation, such as bicycles and pedestrians 2. Where conflicting uses must occur together, minimize the impact of the conflict through educa- tion, signing, scheduling of time and site management. 3. Establish and enforce city ordinances that control conflicting uses of recreational sites and facili- ties. 4. Establish and manage some sites that serve a sole purpose or use, when no other solution will work as well. OBJECTIVE VI: Develop a partnership with private, local, state & federal recreation provid- ers in order to avoid duplication of services. Strategies 1. When invited, designate representatives of the park and recreation advisory committee to serve in organizations dedicated to recreational development in the greater McCall recreation area and report the activities of these organizations regularly to the committee. 2. Encourage any organizations involved in recreational development in the greater McCall area to seek the input of the parks and recreation advisory committee and vice -versa. CONCERNING RECREATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OBJECTIVE VII: Promote, develop and implement year-round community recreation pro- grams. Strategies 1. Develop a package of recreational programs that appeals to all age groups and levels of ability. 2. Continually stimulate interest in lifetime sports and recreational activities by appointing a sub- committee of citizen users of the recreation programs to evaluate the recreational program package annually and comment to the committee in June of each year on the following: a. Elimination of or improvements to existing programs based on their popularity. b. Evaluate the volunteer coaching program and recommend improvements. c. Evaluate the appeal of the recreation program package relative to various age groups and levels of ability. d. Keep the recreation program package dynamic by analyzing changing recreational trends. Recommend new programs that the department can afford to sponsor (by eliminating the expense of a less popular program, by attracting new fees, etc.). OBJECTIVE V 1: Sponsor and administer recreation programs that use role models to encourage responsible behavior by youths. Strategies 1. Encourage funding to attract educated and experienced leaders. 2. Comply with the drug -free workplace act. 3. Support facilities and programs that offer youth controlled opportunities to gather and participate in programs that are healthful and encourage social, mental and skill development. CONCERNING FEES AND FUNDING OBJECTIVE IX: Recognize that parks and recreation programs, facilities and services are valuable to the citzens of McCall and that profitability is only one consideration in evaluating those programs, facilities and services. Strategies 1. Fees charged for special services, supervision, set-up or privileges should be determined in con- sideration of the following: a. market value of service or privilege b. restrictions such requests place on the public's use of park facilities c. nature of the use: profit, non-profit, personal, etc. d. value of the use to the quality of life of the citizens of McCall 2. Fees for youth programs or educational sessions should be kept to a reasonable minimum. OBJECTIVE X: Recognize that there is a serious disparity in who pays for parks and recre- ation services in McCall and who uses parks and recreation services in McCall. Attempt to find a way to balance the burden. Strategies: 1. Create a subcommittee chaired by a member of the park board to recommend alternative funding sources: concessions, grants, gifts, special elections, fund raising efforts, etc. This committee would also explore special taxing districts, annexation of properties to city limits, etc. to spread the funding burden of basic park infrastructure expenses over more of the population of the park system's users. 2. Establish a fee structure throughout the park and recreation system that eases this imbalance by offering discounts to city residents and to other significant contributors, etc. as approved by the advisory committee. 3. Examine land dedication ordinances or other techniques for site acquisition and development. McCall Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1993 TOPIC: EXPANDED RECREATION PROGRAMMING RE: BOARD MEMBERS; RESPONSE REQUESTED FOR DISCUSSION AT MARCH MEETING. PURPOSE: ANALYSIS OF CURRENT PROGRAMMING EXPLORE WAYS OF SUPPORTING PROGRAMMING ESTABLISH TARGET GROUP IDENTIFY PROVIDERS IDENTIFY ALTERNATIVES (a) . ANALYSIS OF CURRENT PROGRAMMING 1. Are current programs run efficiently/cost effective? 2. Are tax dollars getting the biggest bang for the buck? 3. Are current programs market driven? 4. Is there any duplication of programs`' 5. Is there broad based support in the community? 6. Should programming be increased ? 7. Are current fees limiting participation by children of low income? (b) . WAYS OF SUPPORTING EXPANSION 1. Out of City impact fee. 2. User fee 3. Partnership with other govt. entities, corporation school and business. 4. General fund / Tax supported. (c). PROGRAM COMPARISON WITH CITIES OF SIMILAR SIZE. QUESTIONS: 1. Is current program cost effective? Need a breakdown of dollars actually spent and numbers of participants. 2. Is money currently being spent used efficiently? 3. What is the decision making process for deciding new programs or for keeping programs? 4. Is there a duplication of programs? 5. What is the level of current community support? 6. Public should be surveyed on what types of programs would be supported. 7. Has a "Free University" been tried in the past? We need to look at more adult programming. 8. Philosophically, what does the board and city want to see as a emphasis. Should a percent of the budget be dedicated to particular target groups? SUGGESTIONS: 1. ESTABLISH A OUT OF CITY IMPACT/USER FEE. 2. RAISE FEES, CREATE A SLIDING SCALE FOR FEE ASSESSMENT. 3. ACTIVELY SEEK PARTNERSHIPS WITH OTHER GOVT. ENTITIES, LOCAL BUSINESS AND CIVIC GROUPS. 4. 5