HomeMy Public PortalAbout09 September 18, 2023 Technical Advisory
MEETING AGENDA
Technical Advisory Committee
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Savat Khamphou, Chair / Kenny Nguyen, City of Corona
John A. Corella, Vice Chair / Armando Baldizzone, Cathedral City
Art Vela / Nate Smith, City of Banning
VACANT / Robert Vestal, City of Beaumont
VACANT, City of Blythe
Michael Thornton / Travis Bradshaw, City of Calimesa
Albert Vergel De Dios / Sean Young, Caltrans District 8
Stuart McKibbin / Mike Borja, City of Canyon Lake
Andrew Simmons / Maritza Martinez, City of Coachella
Jonathan Hoy / Randy Bowman, CVAG
Daniel Porras / Nick Haecker, City of Desert Hot Springs
Jimmy Chung / Yurhi Choi, City of Eastvale
Noah Rau / Nancy Beltran, City of Hemet
Ken Seumalo / Dina Purvis, City of Indian Wells
Timothy T. Wassil / Donn Uyeno, City of Indio
Paul Toor / Octavio Duran, City of Jurupa Valley
Bryan McKinney / Julie Mignogna, City of La Quinta
Remon Habib / Bradley Brophy, City of Lake Elsinore
Nick Fidler / Daniel Padilla, City of Menifee
Melissa Walker / Harold Zamora, City of Moreno Valley
Bob Moehling / Jeff Hitch, City of Murrieta
Chad Blais / Sam Nelson, City of Norco
Martin Alvarez / VACANT, City of Palm Desert
Joel Montalvo / VACANT, City of Palm Springs
K. George Colangeli / Dale Reynolds, PVVTA
John Pourkazemi / VACANT, City of Perris
Ryan Stendell / VACANT, City of Rancho Mirage
Farshid Mohammadi / Gilbert Hernandez, City of Riverside
Mark Lancaster / Mojahed Salama, County of Riverside
Kristin Warsinski / Jennifer Nguyen, RTA
Travis Randel / Stuart McKibbin, City of San Jacinto
Luis Garcia / Harman Singh, SunLine
Patrick Thomas / Amer Attar, City of Temecula
Christopher Tzeng / Cameron Brown, WRCOG
Jason Farag / Cameron Luna, City of Wildomar
STAFF
Jillian Guizado, Planning and Programming Director
Jenny Chan, Planning and Programming Manager
Martha Masters, Planning and Programming Senior Management Analyst
Edward Emery, Planning and Programming Senior Management Analyst
AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY
Subject to the supervision of the Commission, the Committee shall provide technical assistance to the Commission
by reviewing and evaluating the various transportation proposals and alternatives within Riverside County.
The Committee shall review, comment upon, and make recommendations on such matters as are referred to it by
the Commission, including all matters relating to the programming of federal funds apportioned to the Riverside
County and allocated by the Commission.
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Date: September 18, 2023
Locations: Riverside County Transportation Commission
March Field Conference Room
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501
Council Chamber Conference Room
City of Palm Desert
73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
DATE: September 18, 2023
LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission
March Field Conference Room
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92502
TELECONFERENCE SITE: Council Chamber Conference Room
City of Palm Desert
73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the
Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787‐7141 if
special assistance is needed to participate in a public meeting, including accessibility and translation
services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting
time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the
meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 15, 2023
Page 1
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS – This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating
to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.
5. 2024 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING DISTRIBUTION AND
FUND ESTIMATE
Page 9
Overview
This item is to receive and file the 2024 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
funding distribution and fund estimate.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
September 18, 2023
Page 2
6. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS – UPDATE AND DISCUSSION
Page 13
Overview
This item is for the Technical Advisory Committee to:
1) Discuss updates to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for Cycle 7; and
2) Discuss TDA Article 3 (SB 821) bicycle and pedestrian program and provide input for
modifications to the guidelines and evaluation criteria.
7. 2023 AND 2025 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND 2020 REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT UPDATE
Page 17
Overview
This item is to receive and file an update on the 2023 and 2025 Federal Transportation
Improvement Program (FTIP).
8. OBLIGATION DELIVERY PLAN UPDATE – FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 AND FUTURE
Page 20
Overview
This item is to receive and file an update on Riverside County’s Obligation Delivery Plan.
9. CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE
Page 23
Overview
This item is to receive and file an update from Caltrans District 8 Local Assistance.
10. CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS: MAY, JUNE, AND
AUGUST 2023
Page 36
Overview
This item is to receive and file the May, June, and August 2023 California Transportation
Commission (CTC) meeting highlights.
11. RCTC COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS: MAY, JUNE, AND JULY 2023
Page 37
Overview
This item is to receive and file the May, June, and July 2023 Commission meeting highlights.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda
September 18, 2023
Page 3
12. COMMITTEE MEMBER / STAFF REPORT
Overview
This item provides the opportunity for the committee members and staff to report on attended
and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to committee activities.
13. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the TAC is scheduled to be held November 20, 2023, at 10:00 a.m.
MINUTES
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
Monday, May 15, 2023
1.CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) was called to order by Vice Chair Savat Khamphou at 10:01 a.m., in the March
Field Conference Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street,
Third Floor, Riverside, California, 92501.
2.ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Nate Smith, City of Banning
Jeff Hart, City of Beaumont
Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa
Albert Vergel De Dios, Caltrans
Stuart McKibbin, City of Canyon Lake
John Corella, City of Cathedral City
Randy Bowman, Coachella Valley Association of Governments
Savat Khamphou, City of Corona
Noah Rau, City of Hemet
Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells
Donn Uyeno, City of Indio
Octavio Duran, City of Jurupa Valley
Bryan McKinney, City of La Quinta
Remon Habib, City of Lake Elsinore
Nick Fidler, City of Menifee
Melissa Walker, City of Moreno Valley
Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta
John Pourkazemi, City of Perris
Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside
Mojahed Salama, Riverside County
Travis Randel, City of San Jacinto
Luis Garcia, Sunline Transit Agency
Patrick Thomas, City of Temecula
Jason Farag, City of Wildomar
3.APPROVAL OF MINUTES – NOVEMBER 21, 2022
B/C/A (Corella/Mohammadi) to approve the Minutes as submitted. There were no objections
to this motion.
1
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 2
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
5. ELECTION OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE OFFICERS
B/C/A (Mohammadi/Corella) to elect Savat Khamphou as Chair.
B/C/A (Khamphou/Randel) to elect John Corella as Vice Chair.
6. REVISED 2023 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULE
Jillian Guizado, RCTC, provided information on the revised 2023 TAC meeting schedule. Back in
May 2022, an item was brought to the TAC to discuss meeting locations for when meeting in
person would be required. In November 2022, the TAC adopted the 2023 Meeting Schedule,
with most meetings offered in two locations, in Riverside and at the CVAG office.
The slightly revised meeting schedule is being brought back to the TAC to provide a specific
meeting site location for the Coachella Valley. The meetings in the Coachella Valley will be held
in the City of Palm Desert’s Council Chamber Conference Room. There will be further detailed
information on that location before the next meeting in July.
At the July, and subsequent meetings, TAC members will have the option to participate at either
location. Only the two meeting sites will be used for TAC member participation.
Vice Chair Khamphou wanted to know with the meeting being offered in Palm Desert if there
was also an option to join the meeting remotely. Ms. Guizado explained that staff is proposing
that all subsequent 2023 meetings be held both at RCTC and Palm Desert. RCTC staff will attend
at both locations and members will have the option to attend from either.
B/C/A (Randel/Seumalo) to approve the Revised 2023 TAC meeting schedule. There were no
objections to this motion.
7. 2023 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL ARTERIALS CALL FOR PROJECTS FUNDING
RECOMMENDATIONS
Ms. Guizado stated it has been 10 years since RCTC put out a call for projects that included
funding for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) and Measure A Regional Arterial
Projects. Funding is being recommended for 14 Measure A Regional Arterial Projects and six
TUMF Regional Arterial Projects for a combined amount of $134.7 million.
The Measure A expenditure plan approved by voters in 2002 specifies that in Western Riverside
County there are seven categories for Measure A distribution, the fourth category for Regional
Arterial Projects is where the bulk of the funding comes from. Measure A established four
2
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 3
categories in the Coachella Valley, which CVAG manages on behalf of the sub-region and one
category in the Palo Verde Valley which is administered by Blythe and the County of Riverside.
This call for projects was specifically for distribution of Western Riverside County funds and can
only be awarded and spent in that sub-region. In the call for projects, there is $85 million
available in the Measure A Regional Arterials Fund, and $50 million from TUMF Regional
Arterials Fund. Only projects identified on the TUMF backbone network, as opposed to the
TUMF secondary network, are eligible to utilize the RCTC TUMF Regional Arterial Funds.
At the November 21 TAC meeting, the TAC created a sub-committee to work with staff on the
Regional Arterials Call for Projects Guidelines. On January 11, staff convened the
sub-committee which was comprised of eight of the eligible 19 Western County agencies:
Calimesa, Menifee, Banning, County of Riverside, Moreno Valley, Temecula, Murrieta, and
Wildomar.
The call was put out in February and closed on April 5. Twenty-five applications were received
from 15 different agencies, there were four eligible agencies that did not apply. The total
funding requested was $185 million, which was about $50 million oversubscribed. The value of
all the projects submitted was just over $600 million.
Only eight of the project applications received were for projects on the TUMF backbone
network, two of the projects are not being recommended for TUMF funding and tw o more
projects are only being recommended for partial TUMF funding. This is due to the projects
already being at the TUMF maximum share and/or reaching the TUMF maximum share with the
funding recommended. In total, RCTC has $50 million of TUMF Regional Arterial funding
available, and the total recommended amount of funding is $49.8 million.
The Measure A Regional Arterial side is oversubscribed by about $38 million. Fourteen projects
are being recommended to receive Measure A Regional Arterial funds, with the remaining six
projects on the contingency list should any of the funded projects be unable to advance. Only
one project is recommended for partial funding due to reaching the $85 million Measure A
Regional Arterial spending limit. Attachment 1 to the agenda item shows that most of the
projects are being funded for the construction phase and are shovel ready.
Staff’s approach to the funding recommendations falls into three categories. Priority projects
have no concerns with the deliverability of the project both from a schedule and funding
standpoint and should be able to advance. Projects with conditional approval are still being
recommended for full approval but are designated as such for having either a schedule or
funding concern and need to be monitored. Projects on the contingency list were those that
fell below the funding line. If there are projects on either the priority or conditional list that are
not able to advance or secure other funding, the freed up local dollars can be used on the
contingency list projects. RCTC plans on putting this call for projects out every two years,
funding permitting.
3
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 4
The final action for staff’s recommendation is slated for the June 14 Commission meeting.
If approved, awarded agencies will have five months to execute the funding agreement with
RCTC and 24 months to submit the initial invoice. Once staff receives final approval from the
Commission, staff will reach out to all 19 eligible agencies to solicit feedback on the guidelines,
the process, and any other feedback to be able to make improvements on future calls for
projects.
B/C/A (Thornton/Corella) to approve staff funding recommendations and preparation and
execution of funding agreements. There were no objections to this motion.
8. CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE
Albert Vergel De Dios, Caltrans, introduced Elaine Rogers, Caltrans, who provided a
presentation on Caltrans Local Assistance. The FHWA has repealed the 10-year preliminary
engineering rule. Prior to the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (also known as the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act - IIJA), an agency was required to repay Federal reimbursements of
Preliminary Engineering (PE) costs if a project did not advance to right of way acquisition or on-
site construction within 10 years of the initial PE obligation. On November 15, 2021, that rule
was repealed and is no longer in effect. The change was not effective immediately, but on
February 4, 2022, FHWA paused all activities relating to the 10-year PE Rule, including
monitoring projects approaching the 10-year limit and repayment actions until additional
guidance was developed. Guidance was provided on December 9, 2022, to assist FHWA
Division Offices in identifying any Federal-aid projects that have not satisfied the 10-year PE
Rule and require repayment. The FHWA California Division has determined that there are no
Caltrans or local Federal aid projects that are subject to repayment.
There will be an upcoming informational webinar – Build America Buy America. This is a
requirement resulting from the IIJA, and the Build America Buy America (BABA) Act which
requires extension of Buy America preferences on construction materials (non-ferrous metals,
plastic/polymer-based products, glass, optical glass, lumber, or drywall) be permanently
incorporated in Federal-aid projects. This requirement became effective on November 10,
2022. The informational webinar is May 31, 2023, from 9-11 a.m. The webinar is open to all
local agencies and registration is required.
Caltrans Division of Transportation Planning leads Caltrans Letter of Support (LOS) requests
from local and regional agencies for inclusion in their project application packages for
competitive grant programs. The Caltrans Office of Strategic Investment Planning is responsible
for submitting LOS request packages to the Director for various state and federal grant
programs.
Caltrans Division of Local Assistance Office of Project Management Oversight (OPMO) has a new
Project End Date (PED) Extension Tool that has been created for use on local projects.
The intent of this tool is to provide a streamlined process for Local Public Agencies (LPAs) to
request extensions for PEDs on existing projects. This tool will be used to simplify the PED
Extension process for LPAs and allow OPMO to track and monitor project statuses.
4
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 5
Agencies may request a PED extension using this form without completing a Local Assistance
Procedures Manual (LAPM) form 3-A: Project Authorization/Adjustment Request.
The deadline for justification of inactive projects was May 5, 2023. While this deadline has
passed, there are several great resources to be found on the Division of Local Assistance’s
Inactive Projects webpage.
The FHWA Fiscal Year 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Safe Streets and Roads for All
(SS4A) grant is live on Grants.gov and open for applications. The deadline for applications is
Monday, July 10, 2023, by 2:00 p.m. (PT). Late applications will not be accepted.
Caltrans Oversite Information Notice #19-02 has been revised. Changes were made for a
correction to the existing language clarifying that the Division of State Architect (DSA) review is
for state-only funded projects (not SB 1 projects). Language has also been added regarding the
Certified Access Specialist program for state-only funded projects with sidewalks and related
facilities that are not Safe Routes to School projects.
The open comment period for the Local Programs Procedures will close on July 31, 2023.
There have been two policy updates. The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Update has been
finalized though the Prompt Payment Certification Office Bulletin requires edits to the same
exhibits and is currently in the final stages for publication. The Prompt Payment Certification
stakeholder comments have been finalized, and publication should be completed in May.
There have also been two exhibit/form updates. LAPG Exhibit 25-S: Project Delivery Report –
Local Partnership Program has been removed; SB 1 programs utilize CalSMART for reporting.
LAPM 5-A has had the pilot phase completed with minor bug fixes and text edits have been
submitted for final coding.
Jenny Chan, RCTC, asked how much time Caltrans needs to assess requests for letters of
support. Mr. Vergel De Dios stated that Caltrans would need a week or two to complete the
review process, depending on the workload.
Vice Chair Khamphou added that a lot of the new applications for the next 3-4 years under the
Build Back Better policy, need letters of recommendation and having one from Caltrans would
be a plus. Caltrans has also been known to send the letters directly to the federal organizations,
so agencies should stay on top of those requests.
Mr. Vergel De Dios added that Caltrans generally approves all letter requests. There are quite
a few new programs available and some of them are making it easier for agencies to apply.
The SS4A is going to have a quick approval with the District; Headquarters will not be involved
in the process. The state earmarks are simple enough and agencies need only go through an
agreement and FTA transfer.
5
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 6
Since everyone is back to in person meetings, Headquarters is hosting an in-person A&E
meeting, it will be starting in the Northern District and then move to the Southern. The in-
person training will be June 15.
9. CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS: DECEMBER 2022 AND
MARCH 2023
Ms. Guizado stated that even though there have been three CTC meetings since the TAC last
met, there have not been too many worthy items to highlight. The CTC Executive Director,
Mitch Weiss, is no longer with the agency; they are currently operating with an interim director,
Tanisha Taylor. The Commission is now represented by a super majority of non-transportation
advocacy-oriented individuals from around the state. There is still Commissioner Tavagilone
representing the Inland Empire, but when the time comes for his re-appointment or
replacement, RCTC is not optimistic about who it will be.
A lot of time is now spent during CTC meetings talking about equity, air quality, active
transportation, and now commissioners are even raising questions about project descriptions
and approved environmental documents. The promise of SB 1 finally bringing the state to the
table and helping to fund local transportation projects is probably short-lived. As many are
already starting to experience, SB 743’s VMT requirement and the state’s position on
constructing highway improvements, including replacing 60-year-old bridges, is stifling
agencies’ ability to improve our residents’ mobility.
10. RCTC COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS: DECEMBER 2022 AND JANUARY, FEBRUARY,
MARCH, AND MAY 2023
Ms. Guizado noted that the Commission has been busy updating the legislative platform,
revising toll policies, and everything in-between. Measure A and LTF receipts continue to come
in strong, so hopefully that is helping the agencies complete the much-needed work on local
streets and roads. The Commission meetings are now fully in-person in Riverside and the
committee meetings are being held in person with three satellite meeting locations in Riverside,
French Valley, and Palm Desert.
At the Commission’s March meeting, the Active Transportation Program Cycle 6 Metropolitan
Planning Organization list was reviewed and forwarded to the Southern California Association
of Governments. The Commission halted its Riverside-Downtown Metrolink Station platform
expansion project and RCTC and CVAG memorialized a funding agreement to ensure the Eastern
County receives its formula share coming from various places.
The write up for the May Commission items is inaccurate, the correct info rmation will be
provided at the next TAC meeting in July.
The next Commission meeting will be held on June 14 in Riverside.
6
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 7
11. COMMITTEE MEMBER / STAFF REPORT
Edward Emery, RCTC, announced that the SB 821 Call for Projects opened on February 6, with
a program capacity of $6.9 million; each project was capped at $690,000 and each agency at
$1.38 million. Applications were due to RCTC via RIVTrack on April 27. RCTC received 29
applications, requesting roughly $15 million, about $8 million oversubscribed. Evaluation teams
are currently reviewing the applications and will be meeting on May 24 to finalize
recommendations. The recommendations will be going to RCTC committee in June, with formal
adoption in July.
Ms. Chan asked the TAC about earmarks agencies have been receiving for projects and whether
an earmark training would be helpful for TAC members or city staff.
Mr. Vergel De Dios added that state earmarks have guidelines that take time to develop, and
headquarters has created office hours for the earmarks. Every other week there is a meeting
that all agencies can join to discuss the earmarks program, status, and how to receive funding.
Caltrans recently finalized the agreement with FTA for the 2022 Earmarks. No agency in
Riverside received any state earmarks this time. Federal earmarks still must go through the E-76
process.
Ms. Chan stated that from the information that RCTC has received, there is also an earmark
application process. This might be something that agencies are not familiar with, which would
be another reason to provide training for the TAC on the process.
Mr. Vergel De Dios noted that he intended to bring someone from headquarters to a future
meeting, but with an in-person meeting it can be difficult, virtual is easier. If someone from
headquarters cannot attend a future TAC, some of the area coordinators should be able to
present the earmark process.
Nick Fidler, Menifee, stated they would appreciate bringing someone in to discuss the earmark
process. Indian Wells, Moreno Valley, and Murrieta also expressed interest.
Mr. Vergel De Dios stated that this will be an action item for Caltrans and they will work to set
up a future presentation on the earmark process.
John Corella, Cathedral City, thought a training on the earmark process would be very valuable,
because the process is always last minute and haphazard. If there was a better way to get some
advanced warning it would be helpful.
Octavio Duran, Jurupa Valley, noted that the city received funding on a project that was fully
designed and ready. He was unsure when the project goes out to bid whether it still has to
follow the same funding process as other projects. Mr. Vergel De Dios shared that from what
he understands, the project would still have to go through the process of submitting the E -76,
but the process should be smooth once the earmark has been approved.
7
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
May 15, 2023
Page 8
Patrick Thomas, Temecula, stated the city received an earmark for a transportation project that
came from HUD, so it was not processed through FHWA or Caltrans. HUD has been offering a
plethora of trainings on the earmark process.
Mr. Corella wanted to know what the HUD funding covered and what the percentage of
participation was. Mr. Thomas stated that the project was a roundabout and participation was
not a requirement, but the project cost was $1 million, and only $800,000 was requested.
Luis Garcia, Sunline Transit, wanted to request that the training include flexing the funds over.
Sunline Transit received money from FHWA and generally have to flex it back to FTA.
Ms. Guizado had the RCTC Planning and Programming team introduce themselves.
• Jenny Chan, Planning and Programming Manager
• Edward Emery, Senior Management Analyst
• Martha Masters, Senior Management Analyst
Although Chair Hoy could not be here today, he was thanked for his service to the TAC. He will
be presented with a certificate at the next TAC meeting.
15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the
meeting adjourned at approximately 10:51 a.m. The next meeting will be on July 17, 2023, at
10:00 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jillian Guizado
Planning and Programming Director
8
AGENDA ITEM 5
Agenda Item 5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Edward Emery, Senior Management Analyst, Planning and Programming
Jillian Guizado, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT: 2024 State Transportation Improvement Program Funding Distribution and
Fund Estimate
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is to receive and file the 2024 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
funding distribution and fund estimate.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The STIP is a five-year program of projects administered by the California Transportation
Commission (CTC). It is updated every two years outlining the commitment and programming of
transportation funds for the State’s multimodal transportation system, including: highways, rail,
transit, local roads, and bike and pedestrian facilities. In June of every odd year, Caltrans is
required to prepare a draft STIP Fund Estimate (FE) that estimates how much funding will be
available for programming for the next five-year period. The CTC released the draft 2024 STIP FE
at its June 28, 2023, meeting and adopted the final 2024 STIP FE at its August 16, 2023, meeting.
The 2024 STIP will cover Fiscal Years 2024/25 through 2028/29. Each STIP cycle adds on two
years with most of the programming capacity available in the last two years. STIP funds are
allocated into two broad programs – the Regional Improvement Program (RIP) receives
75 percent of the total STIP funds, and the remaining 25 percent is directed to Caltrans for its
Interregional Transportation Improvement Program. The 75 percent RIP funding is further
subdivided by formula into county shares. County shares are available solely for projects
nominated by regional agencies. The 2024 STIP FE also establishes funding levels for the
State Highway Operation and Protection Program, which Caltrans prepares in consultation with
the regions.
STIP Intracounty Formula Distribution
Per the Commission’s STIP intracounty formula distribution approved in 1998 through an MOU
between the Commission, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, and Western Riverside
Council of Governments, STIP funds are allocated to Western County, Coachella Valley, and
Palo Verde Valley based on the most recent fiscal year taxable sales by geographic area used for
Measure A allocations. As seen in Table 1, the geographic area percentages of taxable sales
9
Agenda Item 5
applied to the 2016 through 2024 STIPs demonstrates a growing trend in Western County
compared to Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys:
Table 1. Taxable Sales Share by Riverside County Geographic Area
Geographic Area 2016 STIP 2018 STIP 2020 STIP 2022 STIP 2024 STIP
Western County 75.76% 77.30% 78.12% 78.14% 79.91%
Coachella Valley 23.54% 22.11% 21.45% 21.42% 19.70%
Palo Verde Valley 0.70% 0.59% 0.43% 0.44% 0.39%
Per the STIP intracounty distribution formula, each geographic area will receive funding based on
the above percentages. In addition, state law allows up to five percent of RIP funding for
Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM) activities. The Commission’s typical practice has
been to set aside two percent for PPM activities to fund Project Study Reports, planning, and
staff costs associated with STIP funding, programming, and project administration. PPM funding
is available for Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and Commission activities.
DISCUSSION:
2024 STIP FE
On August 16, 2023, the CTC adopted the final 2024 STIP FE, which identifies county share targets
for each region in the state. Statewide, $2.5 billion of new STIP capacity is available in the 2024
STIP; of this amount, $59,788,000 is identified for Riverside County. The majority of new STIP
capacity is available in the last two years of the 2024 STIP cycle, FYs 2027/28 and 2028/29.
Table 2 reflects how the Riverside County STIP funds should be distributed according to the STIP
intracounty MOU. Staff is proposing to increase the PPM off the top allocation from two percent
to three percent with the one percent increase intended to cover staff time spent advancing the
Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service (CV Rail) project into the Tier 2
environmental phase. The remaining two percent of PPM will be shared between the
Commission and CVAG as detailed in MOU No. 23-66-052-00.
Table 2. 2024 STIP FE – Riverside County Share Target
Total Riverside County Share $ 59,788,000
Less: 3 percent PPM 1,793,640
Less: PVV delta from 2022 Target/Max 68,895
Total New Project Programming 57,925,465
Western County 79.91 percent 46,288,239
Coachella Valley 19.70 percent *11,411,316
Palo Verde Valley 0.39 percent 225,909
*Actual Coachella Valley amount available is $6,778,587
10
Agenda Item 5
In the 2022 STIP, the Commission programmed the delta of its STIP Maximum and Target shares
($15,658,000) on CV Rail. In doing so, Palo Verde Valley did not receive its formula share of the
delta. That amounts are reflected in Table 2 as “PVV delta from 2022 Target/Max.”
2024 STIP Project Selection Process
The Commission is the entity that prepares, approves, and submits the STIP proposal for the
entirety of Riverside County. Each of the three geographics areas of the county have a different
process for selecting projects for inclusion in the STIP.
Western Riverside County
Western Riverside County projects are nominated by Commission staff. Recommendations for
current and new projects for STIP funds will be considered and based on the 2019-29 Measure A
Highway Delivery Plan and other high priority projects approved by the Commission.
Coachella Valley
CVAG nominates its projects and notifies Commission staff for final concurrence and submittal
to the CTC. Staff will review the programming process and timeline with CVAG staff and present
CVAG’s recommended projects to the Commission for inclusion in the 2024 STIP submittal.
As previously noted, in the 2022 STIP, the Commission programmed up to the Maximum STIP
share by programming $15,658,000 for the CV Rail project without considering a proportional
cost share between Riverside County geographic areas. With 64 percent of the Riverside County
CV Rail track mileage share located in the Coachella Valley, the Coachella Valley’s STIP formula
share contribution to CV Rail is $10,021,120. Utilizing its taxable sales share of the $15,658,000
2022 STIP amount programmed on CV Rail, the Coachella Valley was only contributing
$3,388,391; combining this with $6,632,729 of 2024 STIP Coachella Valley share will achieve the
Coachella Valley’s $10,021,120 track mileage share STIP contribution to the CV Rail Tier 2
environmental phase. This leaves $4,778,587 of 2024 STIP funding for CVAG to nominate on a
project. Additionally, as staff reported to the Commission at its May 2022 meeting, in the 2022
STIP, CVAG requested the $2 million previously programmed in the 2020 STIP for the
Interstate 10/Avenue 50 interchange be de-programmed. This request was based on action the
CVAG Executive Committee took at its September 30, 2019, Executive Committee meeting.
The $2 million deprogrammed needs to be added back into the Coachella Valley share during the
2024 STIP cycle, bringing the total Coachella Valley amount of 2024 STIP funding available for
programming to $6,778,587.
Palo Verde Valley
Palo Verde Valley projects are nominated by the city of Blythe (Blythe); however, given the minor
amount of funding typically available and the complexity in processing these funds, the
Commission and Blythe have executed MOUs in past STIP cycles trading Palo Verde Valley STIP
funds with Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds. Blythe is required to include
the STIP traded funds in its Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan.
Upon CTC’s adoption of the 2024 STIP in March 2024, staff will move forward with preparing the
2024 STIP MOU with Blythe.
11
Agenda Item 5
Status of Current 2022 STIP Programming
Table 3 illustrates the current 2022 STIP projects programmed in Riverside County.
Table 3. 2022 STIP – Riverside County (Approved by CTC in March 2022)
Agency Project Phase FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27 Total STIP
RCTC AB 3090 –
71/91 IC
C $19,913,000 $33,189,000 $13,275,000 $66,377,000
RCTC I-10/Highland
Springs IC
C 14,698,000 14,698,000
County Temescal
Canyon Road
C 13,000,000 13,000,000
CVAG I-10/Monroe
IC
C 7,550,000 7,550,000
RCTC/
CVAG
CV Rail E 15,658,000 15,658,000
RCTC/
CVAG
PPM C 696,000 600,000 315,000 200,000 519,000 2,330,000
Totals $696,000 $600,000 $315,000 $23,408,000 $28,217,000 $53,236,000
C = Construction
IC = Interchange
E = Environmental
PPM = Planning, Programming, and Monitoring
Because of the large amount of STIP funding programmed on the State Route 71/91 Interchange
project, STIP funds are being made available over the three-year life of the project as identified
in the table. Projects programmed in FYs 2025/26 and 2026/27 will be reviewed for carryover
into the 2024 STIP.
The 2024 STIP submittal is due to the CTC by December 15, 2023. CTC adoption of the 2024 STIP
is scheduled for March 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the Commission related to the adoption of the 2024 STIP funding
distribution.
12
AGENDA ITEM 6
Agenda Item 6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Edward Emery, Sr. Management Analyst, Planning and Programming
SUBJECT: Active Transportation Programs - Update and Discussion
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Technical Advisory Committee to:
1) Discuss updates to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for Cycle 7; and
2) Discuss TDA Article 3 (SB 821) bicycle and pedestrian program and provide input for
modifications to the guidelines and evaluation criteria.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Active transportation projects in Riverside County are primarily funded through the ATP and the
SB 821 program.
ATP is a highly competitive statewide program that funds bicycle and pedestrian facilities and
programs to enhance or encourage walking and biking. The California Transportation
Commission (CTC) awards 50% of the funds at the statewide competitive level, 10% to small
urban and rural regions, and 40% at the large Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) level.
The ATP evaluation process allows applicants in Riverside County two opportunities for award –
at the statewide level and the large MPO level. As part of the sequential project selection,
projects are first evaluated statewide and those that are not ranked high enough for statewide
funding are automatically provided a second opportunity for funding through the large MPO
share. As the MPO, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is required to
work with county transportation commissions, the CTC, and Caltrans to develop its regional
program recommendations.
SB 821 is a discretionary program administered by the Commission to fund local bicycle and
pedestrian projects. The program is funded through the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), a
¼ percent of the state sales tax. Each year, 2 percent of LTF revenues are set aside for the SB 821
program, and on every odd-numbered year the Commission conducts a competitive call for
projects in which all local agencies within the county can submit applications. Eligible projects
include construction of bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and Americans with Disabilities Act curb ramps,
and the development of bicycle and pedestrian master plans.
13
Agenda Item 6
DISCUSSION:
ATP
On August 16, 2023, the CTC held the ATP Cycle 7 kickoff meeting to provide updates to the
program. An overview of general information shared is provided below in Table 1 – General
Program Updates. A timeline of upcoming workshops and Cycle 7 milestones is provided in
Table 2 – ATP Timeline.
Table 1 – General Program Updates
Statewide Capacity $555.5M
Estimated SCAG Portion $117M
Estimated Riverside County Portion $14M
Application Process Applications will be submitted and evaluated
electronically.
Workshop Format Hybrid format, virtual and in-person options. In-person
options will take place in different regions.
Table 2 – ATP Timeline
CTC holds Central Workshops
(virtual)
August 2023 – February 2024
CTC holds Branch Workshops (in
person)
September 2023 – March 2024
CTC holds Site Visits (virtual) September 2023 – March 2024
CTC Presents Draft Guidelines to
Commission
January 25-26, 2024
CTC adopts ATP Guidelines March 21-22, 2024
CTC releases Call for Projects March 21-22, 2024
CTC Adopts Statewide Component
Project Funding Recommendations
December 5-6, 2024
MPO Component Project Funding
Recommendations Due
April 22, 2025
MPO Component Project Funding
Recommendations Adopted by CTC
June 2025
Staff is seeking feedback from TAC members on the topics listed below that were discussed in
the ATP Cycle 7 kickoff meeting. Discussion is not limited to these topics and can include other
items proposed by TAC members.
• General experience with the ATP application.
• Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) Question and Scoring – Meeting participants opted to
reopen this for discussion. CTC has advised against reopening this topic and stated points
are awarded for projects benefiting DAC’s even if the project is not located in a DAC.
14
Agenda Item 6
• Additional Metrics - New metrics may include injuries, driver yield compliance, reduced
speed, jobs created.
• Cycle 7 Funding Caps - The CTC asked the TAC to weigh in on funding caps for ATP
applications due to an increase in the size of ATP projects over the cycles. Overall, the
group was not in favor of this due to concerns with securing significant funding for ATP
projects. This change may still be proposed.
• Quick Build Projects - CTC indicated not many Quick Build Projects are being submitted.
CTC is proposing a Quick Build Working Group to develop recommendations on
strengthening guidelines and planning an educational workshop for applicants.
SCAG volunteered to support this effort.
SB 821
During the FY 2023/24 SB 821 Call for Projects, staff received constructive feedback from
applicants and evaluators relating to general program policy, questions on the application, and
the scoring metrics.
Staff proposes discussing these concerns with the TAC and making updates to program guidelines
and scoring metrics. This agenda item begins the discussion and final revisions will be brought
back to the TAC in September 2024 for recommendation to forward to the December 2024
Budget and Implementation Committee, if necessary. Staff will also consider other options
proposed by TAC members. A list of preliminary discussion topics is below.
• Destinations Served Question – Discuss updating scoring metric from 2 points per
destination served to 2 points per destination type served. This would encourage projects
linking non-motorized travelers to a diverse set of destinations. Currently, as an example,
a project serving 7 fast food locations would receive the full 14 points.
• Safety Question – Staff received feedback that the safety question is too subjective.
To reduce subjectivity with this question staff proposes separating point awarding
activities into bullet points and adding clarification that consideration may be given to the
number and severity of accidents in the project area.
• Class III Bicycle Lanes – SB 821 funds can only be used to fund projects benefiting bicyclists
and pedestrians. Discuss thoughts on eligibility for Class III bicycle lanes.
Should associated road improvements be eligible given mixed use with vehicles.
• Multimodal Question Equity – Feedback has been received that smaller agencies are
unable to score well on the Multimodal question. Currently, an agency is awarded 1 point
per mode improved by the project. Smaller agencies are less likely to have Park and Ride
lots, Metrolink Stations and other facilities. Discuss options, such as jurisdictions under a
certain population/criterion will receive 2 points per mode rather than one.
• New Project Readiness and/or Past Performance scoring metric – Discuss the addition of
a project readiness and/or past performance scoring metric to encourage projects that
are more shovel ready. Points could be moved from the safety question.
A timeline of upcoming 2025 SB 821 milestones is provided in Table 3 – SB 821 Timeline.
15
Agenda Item 6
Table 3 – SB 821 Timeline
Discussion Initiated with TAC September 18, 2023
Feedback is Received and
Incorporated into Guidelines
September 2023 – August 2024
Final Revisions brought back to the
TAC for approval
September 2024
Recommendations forwarded to
Budget and Implementation
Committee and Commission for
Adoption, if necessary
December 2024/January 2025
Call for Projects Released February 3, 2025
Proposals due to RCTC via RivTrack April 24, 2025
Project Start July 1, 2025
Deadline to Execute MOU October 1, 2025
Project Completion July 1, 2028
16
AGENDA ITEM 7
Agenda Item 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Martha Masters, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT: 2023 and 2025 Federal Transportation Improvement Program and 2020
Regional Transportation Plan Amendment Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is to receive and file an update on the 2023 and 2025 Federal Transportation
Improvement Program (FTIP).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The FTIP is a listing of multi-modal transportation projects proposed over a six-year period for
the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region. The projects include highway
improvements, transit, rail and bus facilities, high occupancy vehicle lanes, active transportation
facilities and activities, signal synchronization, intersection improvements, freeway ramps, and
more. SCAG produces a biennial FTIP update for the region on an odd-year cycle. The FTIP
update is an extensive process that adheres to state and federal requirements under the
Clean Air Act and State Implementation Plan, requiring complete review of individual projects
and cross-checking modeling details to ensure transportation conformity.
DISCUSSION:
2023 FTIP
The 2023 FTIP (#23-00) and Amendments #23-01 through #23-15 have received SCAG/federal
approvals as of September 18th. All approved 2023 FTIP amendments are available on SCAG’s
website: Public Website (ecointeractive.com).
Commission Planning and Programming staff should be notified by agencies of any project
changes so they can be properly incorporated into the FTIP to avoid project delays, especially as
it relates to federal funds that require programming in the FTIP for obligation. The next formal
amendment is due to SCAG on September 19th. The next administrative modification is due to
SCAG on October 10th. The 2023 FTIP Amendment schedule is provided as Attachment 1.
Staff requests that any emergency revisions to FTIP projects be provided as soon as possible to
meet the SCAG deadlines. Agencies can check their most recently submitted FTIP projects by
visiting SCAG’s website: 2023 Proposed Amendments - Southern California Association of
Governments. The 2023 FTIP will expire in December 2024, once the 2025 FTIP is approved.
Therefore, staff urges local agencies’ staff to review their current projects in the 2023 FTIP and
17
Agenda Item 7
submit any revisions to prevent delays in federal obligations required between now and
December 2024.
2025 FTIP
On August 10th, staff emailed the 2025 FTIP Update Memo and FTIP projects via the Commission’s
programming database, RivTrack. Instructions and training videos were part of the FTIP Memo.
The 2025 FTIP is anticipated to be fully approved in December 2024. Updates were due
September 8th. Thank you to all agencies that submitted updates. If your agency has not
submitted updates, please do as soon as possible.
RCTC Planning and Programming staff are available to assist with any questions about on-going
projects that may require updates in the 2023 or 2025 FTIP for federal approvals and/or federal
obligations.
As a general reminder, staff can provide agencies all their project sheets from the FTIP upon
request at any time throughout the year. Non-modeling updates can be submitted to SCAG
approximately monthly. Staff will work with agencies on a case-by-case basis if modeling updates
are needed, however, these changes are recommended to be brought up to staff as soon as
possible as the opportunities to update modeled projects are rare.
2025 FTIP Guidelines
The 2025 FTIP Guidelines provide a framework for federal, state, and regional requirements in
developing the FTIP for the SCAG region. The guidelines are a helpful resource for agencies that
may have questions regarding, for example, what types of projects need to be modeled and what
information is required to model projects. The 2025 FTIP Draft Guidelines are accessible to all
agencies and can be found here: 2025 FTIP Guidelines. Final guidelines will be posted at the
same link once they are adopted. SCAG updates the FTIP guidelines every two years.
Commission staff are always available to assist with questions.
2025 FTIP Additional Questions
Staff has been informed by SCAG that additional performance measure and equity questions will
be coming soon for the 2025 FTIP. A sample question would look like the following: Is the
proposed project located in, adjacent to (within 200 feet), or serving a disadvantaged area (per
SB 535, Climate Economic Justice Screening Tool, or Equitable Transportation Community
Explorer)? SCAG has not finalized these questions, but staff will share more information as soon
as it becomes available.
Attachment: 2023 FTIP Amendment Schedule
18
Due Date
(by Noon)Amendments Administrative Modifications
Tuesday, October 11, 2022 Conformity Amendment #23-03 ***
Tuesday, November 1, 2022
A23-98****- Modeling Amendment -
Will become the 2024 RTP
Consistency Amendment (TBD)
Tuesday, January 3, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-04
Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Amendment #23-05
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-06
Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-07
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 Amendment #23-08
Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-09
Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-10
Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Amendment #23-11
Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-12
Monday, July 3, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-13
Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Amendment #23-14
Tuesday, August 1, 2023
Conformity Amendment #23-26 $
(Consistency Amendment to 2024
RTP)
Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-15
Tuesday, September 12, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-16
Tuesday, September 19, 2023 Amendment #23-17
Tuesday, October 10, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-18
Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-19
Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Amendment #23-20
Tuesday, December 12, 2023 Administrative Modification #23-21
Tuesday, January 9, 2024 Administrative Modification #23-22 $$
Tuesday, January 16, 2024 Amendment #23-23 $$
Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Administrative Modification #23-24 $$
Tuesday, March 12, 2024 Administrative Modification #23-25 $$
Tuesday, March 19, 2024 Amendment #23-27 $$
Updated 5/18/23
*** ‐ Modeling Amendment for 2020 RTP Amendment #3 ‐ Actual FTIP Amendment for programming updates to 23‐99 projects is A23‐03
**** ‐ Modeling Amendment to collect modeling changes for the 2024 RTP FTIP Consistency Amendment (#23‐26)
Amendment #23‐11 will be last opportunity to add new STBG/CMAQ funded projects under the current process.
2023 FTIP AMENDMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION SCHEDULE
$ ‐ Consistency Amendment #23‐26 to 2024 RTP (this amendment includes all projects modeled in A23‐98). Due to SCAG in August in order to release for public review
with 2024 RTP. Numbering it #23‐26 to minimize the work to upload to CTIPs once the 2024 RTP is approved in June 2024.
$$ Amendments submitted during this period should only be emergency type (necessary changes for obligations) as the 2025 FTIP is being
developed.
19
AGENDA ITEM 8
Agenda Item 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Jenny Chan, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT: Obligation Delivery Plan Update – Federal Fiscal Year 2022/23 and Future
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is to receive and file an update on Riverside County’s Obligation Delivery Plan.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), the Commission is responsible for ensuring
that federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant
(STBG) funds apportioned to Riverside County are allocated and obligated in a timely manner to
prevent funds from lapsing. Federal Obligation Authority (OA) for the region is provided on an annual
basis and must be used in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) it is provided. The Commission’s goal is to ensure
that 100 percent of its OA is obligated.
Commission staff work closely with local agencies and the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) to ensure projects on the Obligation Delivery Plan are obligated and delivered. Many of
these projects are from the 2013 Multi-Funding Call for Projects, 2013 Regional Surface Transportation
Program (RSTP, also known as STBG) Call for Projects, Coachella Valley Association of Governments’
2014 CMAQ Call for Projects, various individual funding commitments made by the Commission, and
federal earmarks awarded through Congress. The attached Obligation Delivery Plan provides an
outline of the projects that have CMAQ, STBG, and federal earmarks programmed in FFY 22/23 and
beyond. The information comes from milestone updates received from local agencies, discussions with
project sponsors, and monthly meetings Commission staff has with Caltrans Local Assistance.
It is recommended local agencies begin the federal-aid process as soon as possible, and/or devote the
resources needed to secure federal approvals for obligation, to ensure timely obligation of federal
funds. If a local agency anticipates a delay in obligating these funds this year, Commission staff should
be provided with the new schedule as soon as possible.
Staff is available to assist local agencies with processing Request for Authorization (RFA) submittals and
the overall federal-aid process.
Attachment: Obligation Delivery Plan for FFY 22/23 and Future Years, Including Earmarks
20
Obligation Delivery Plan for FFY 22/23 and Future Years, Including Earmarks
Federal Project Number Project Location/Scope/Description Status
RSTP $ CMAQ $
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC CMLN-6054(103)
In the City of Temecula: Installation of new vehicle detection and
adaptive highway metering systems on I-15 NB from the San Diego
county line to the I-15/I-215 split.$15,200,000 $15,200,000 Delayed to FY 23/24
9 SCAG/RCTC RCTC CMLN-6054(103)
In the City of Temecula: Installation of new vehicle detection and
adaptive highway metering systems on I-15 NB from the San Diego
county line to the I-15/I-215 split.$1,000,000 $1,000,000 Obligated
8 SCAG/RCTC CVAG CML-6164(024)
In eastern Riverside County for CVAG: Regional Signal Synch Phase II
on 18 corridors to include signal upgrades, communication systems,
hardware and software.$21,308,000 $21,308,000 Obligated
8 SCAG/RCTC CVAG ATPL-6164(027)
In eastern Riverside County for CVAG: construct segment 3 of CV Link
phase 1. CV Link is a bicycle, ped and low speed electrical vehicle path
roughly along Whitewater River. $3,567,000 $3,567,000 Obligated
8 SCAG/RCTC CVAG ATPL-6164(028)
In eastern Riverside County for CVAG: construct segment 4 of CV Link
phase 1. CV Link is a bicycle, ped and low speed electrical vehicle path
roughly along Whitewater River. $3,456,000 $3,456,000 Pending
8 SCAG/RCTC CVAG ATPL-6164(029)
In eastern Riverside County for CVAG: construct segment 5 of CV Link
phase 1. CV Link is a bicycle, ped and low speed electrical vehicle path
roughly along Whitewater River. $5,057,000 $5,057,000 Pending
8 SCAG/RCTC Palm Springs BRLO-5282(017)
In Palm Springs: Widen Indian Canyon Dr. from 2 to 6 lanes, from
UPRR overcrossing to Garnet Ave. by replacing existing 2 lane bridge
with six-lane bridge over UP and Amtrak (HBRR#:56C0025).$146,000 $146,000 Pending
8 SCAG/RCTC Rancho Mirage CML-5412(016)
City of Rancho Mirage - construct Free RT, porkchop island, curb and
gutter, relocate signal pole, replace signal loop, remove and relocate
concrete pavement, spandrel, cross gutter, handicap ramp and bus
turnout, install 13,218 L.F.OF 4FT. sand fencing along Ramon Rd. from
Los Alamos Rd. to Bob Hope Dr and along Dinah Shore Dr N/S from
Bob Hope Dr. to Key Largo Ave.$621,000 $621,000 Delayed to FY 23/24
8 SCAG/RCTC SBCTA 15 NEXT Placeholder $14,000,000 $14,000,000 Delayed to FY 23/24
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC 6054(081)I-15 Express Lanes $8,588,526 $8,588,526 Obligated
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC 6054(094)I-15 Southern Extension $6,427,596 $26,757,979 $33,185,575 Obligated
9 SCAG/RCTC RCTC 6054(114)RCTC Vanpool Program $1,851,000 $1,851,000 Obligated
$15,162,121 $92,817,979 $107,980,100
Federal Project Number Project Location/Scope/Description Status
RSTP $ CMAQ $
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC 6054(094)I-15 Southern Extension 12,000,000$ 73,195,000$ 85,195,000$
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC 6054(104) MCP III 109,350,000$ 109,350,000$
8 SCAG/RCTC Calimesa I-10/Cherry Valley Interchange 443,000$ 443,000$
8 SCAG/RCTC Indio I-10/Monroe St Interchange in the city of Indio 26,232,000$ 26,232,000$
Federal Project Number Project Location/Scope/Description Status
Earmark Obligation Expenditure
Amount Deadline Deadline
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC CMLN-6054(103)Interstate 15 Smart Freeway Pilot Project 5,000,000$ 9/30/2025 9/30/2030
8 SCAG/RCTC Menifee Bradley Road Bridge Over Salt Creek 5,000,000$ 9/30/2025 9/30/2030
8 SCAG/RCTC Beaumont Pennsylvania Avenue Widening Project in City of Beaumont 1,500,000$ 9/30/2025 9/30/2030
8 SCAG/RCTC
Riverside
County I-10/Monroe St Interchange in the City of Indio 1,500,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC Murrieta I-215/ Keller Rd Interchange in the City of Murrieta 2,600,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC
Riverside, City
of Third Street grade separation in the City of Riverside.3,000,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC Corona Magnolia Avenue / Temescal Wash Bridge Widening (RIV160405)2,000,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC Corona Ontario Avenue / I15 Multimodal Corridor Enhancement 2,000,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
FFY 22/23
Draft FFY 23/24 & Future
District MPO/RTPA Local Agency
Federal Fund Type
Total Federal
ObligationEnter as: STP 1234(567). If not known, provide
the project FTIP or PPNO number.
Provide location of project: street name, highway, cross-street, etc.; scope of project; and brief
description.
Federal Fund Type
Total Federal
ObligationEnter as: STP 1234(567). If not known, provide
the project FTIP or PPNO number.
Provide location of project: street name, highway, cross-street, etc.; scope of project; and brief
description.District
Enter as: STP 1234(567). If not known, provide
the project FTIP or PPNO number.
Provide location of project: street name, highway, cross-street, etc.; scope of project; and brief
description.
Earmarks
District MPO/RTPA Local Agency
MPO/RTPA Local Agency
21
Obligation Delivery Plan for FFY 22/23 and Future Years, Including Earmarks
8 SCAG/RCTC Menifee
In the city of Menifee - Scott Rd./Bundy Canyon Rd. widening from 2 to
4 lanes from Haun Rd to Sunset Way, relocate existing power poles,
acquire additional right of way, construct drainage improvements 4,000,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC
Desert Hot
Springs
Two new bridges along North Indian Canyon Drive between Pierson
Blvd and HWY 62.2,500,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC
City of Jurupa
Valley Mission Blvd Pavement Rehab 2,300,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC City of Eastvale Pedestrian Bridge over Cucamonga Creek 1,600,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031 Obligated?
8 SCAG/RCTC Lake Elsinore Auto Center Drive Bridge Improvements 2,000,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031
8 SCAG/RCTC RCTC 6054(094)I-15 Southern Extension 3,000,000$ 9/30/2026 9/30/2031 Obligated in FY22/23
22
AGENDA ITEM 9
Agenda Item 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Jenny Chan, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT: Caltrans District 8 Local Assistance Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is to receive and file an update from Caltrans District 8 Local Assistance.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Caltrans' Local Assistance Program oversees more than one billion dollars annually available to over
600 cities, counties, and regional agencies for the purpose of improving their transportation
infrastructure or providing transportation services. This funding comes from various Federal and State
programs specifically designated to assist the transportation needs of local agencies. Annually, over
1,200 new projects are authorized through the Local Assistance Program of which approximately 700
are construction projects.
Caltrans District 8 Local Assistance is responsible for obligating and allocating federal and state funds,
providing guidance on federal and state regulations, and direction on processes and procedures that
are tied to each funding program. Local Assistance is responsible for the current funding programs as
identified in Table 1.
Table 1: Caltrans Local Assistance Funding Program Responsibilities
Federal Programs State Programs
Active Transportation Program (ATP) Active Transportation Program (ATP)
Emergency Relief (ER) Local Partnership Program (LPP) Off-system
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Solutions for Congested Corridors Program
(SCCP) Off-system
Highway Bridge Program (HBP) State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) Off-system
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP)
Off-system
State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) Off-system
Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG)
Attachment 1: Powerpoint presentation slide deck
23
RCTC TAC MTG
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502-2208
Caltrans Local Assistance D8
September 18, 2023
24
Update -
Caltrans Active
Transportation
Program:
Timely Use of
Funds
Calculator
•The Active Transportation Program (ATP) Timely Use of Funds
(TUF) spreadsheet (Calculator) was created as a tool to help
calculate the different deadlines and Time Extensions of Fund
Allocation, Project Development Expenditure/Completion,
Award, and Construction Completion of the different programs.
The TUF calculator is only a guide and does not replace the need
to read and understand the different Program Guidelines.
•Programs Guidelines may be found on the individual program
sites:ATP, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and
Senate Bill 1 (SB1): Local Partnership Programs Competitive
(LPPC), Local Partnership Program Formulaic (LPPF), Solutions for
Congested Corridors Program (SCCP), and Trade Corridor
Enhancement Program (TCEP).
If you have questions regarding TUF Calculator, please contact
a District Local Assistance Engineer in your area.
•ATP Timely Use of Funds (Time Extension)/Delivery Report |
Caltrans
25
Caltrans DLA Implementation Memorandum: 2023 Caltrans
Construction Contract Standards for Local Public Agencies
•California Local Public Agencies (LPAs) using Caltrans
Construction Contract Standards (Standards) for
projects off the State Highway System, regardless of
funding sources, must use the 2023 Standards for
projects receiving approval, allocation, obligation, and
authorization for the construction phase on or after
October 31, 2023.
•LPAs may request District Local Assistance Engineer
(DLAE) approval for up to an additional three (3)
months with reasonable justification.
26
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedure
Manual Update
•A new version of Local Assistance Procedure Manual (LAPM) Form 5-A:
Local Agency Invoice is now available for download here!
A new version of LAPM 5-A (rev 09/2023) has been released. The major change
from the previous version (rev 08/2020) is to the Invoice section where rows
have been added to accommodate projects that have both federal and state
funds.
•For a project with both federal and state funds, an agency will be able to
seek reimbursement for both types in the same column by entering both a
state reimbursement percentage and a federal reimbursement percentage.
Additional rows will be added to separate the federal and state amount that is
reimbursed, as well as help track previous reimbursement amounts and
remaining funds. Other updates include adding a Project End Date, revisions to
the Section 4 Checklist, and minor text edits to the Instructions.
For questions regarding the LAPM 5-A update, contact Local Assistance Office
of Guidance and Oversight.
27
FHWA Office of
Natural
Environment
Metropolitan
Organization
Emissions Measure
•Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Office of
Natural Environment has released a new
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Emissions Measure Target Setting and Reporting
Fact Sheet. The fact sheet is as an easy-to-read flow
chart for MPOs to understand reporting
requirements, the target setting process, and
timeline. FHWA publishes applicability tables for
MPOs who are required to establish targets and
report progress for the performance measures
related to Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement (CMAQ) Program.
For additional information visit the FHWA Air
Quality CMAQ website.
28
Caltrans DLA
Lean Six Sigma
Process
Improvement
Requests Your
Assistance
•The Division of Local Assistance (DLA) has begun a new
Lean Six Sigma project to improve compliance with the Final
Report of Expenditures (FROE) submittal deadlines. The DLA
team is soliciting assistance from local public agencies to
help identify opportunities to facilitate timely submission of
the FROE and make meaningful changes to the process.
The FROE project improvement is in process and runs until
December 2023 and will be accepting volunteers throughout
the lifecycle of the project.
If you are interested in assisting the DLA team or would like
to request more information about this project, please email
Senior Transportation Engineer Cori Marsalek.
•Visit the DLA Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Forms webpage to view more about the FROE Forms.
29
Webinars
from
FHWA &
National
Highway
Institute
30
FHWA Equity
in Roadway
Safety
Webinar
Series
Equity in Roadway Safety Workshop: Strategies for Meaningful Public
Involvement in Roadway Safety Planning
10:00 am – 10:30 am PT – Presentations
-USDOT’s Promising Practices for Meaningful Public Involvement in
Transportation Decision-Making
-Vision Zero Network tools and resources
10:30 am – 12:00 pm PT – Workshop
After the presentations, participants will be able to choose which
workshop to attend.
FHWA invites you to the second technical session of the Equity in
Roadway Safety Webinar Series. Join us on September 20 at 1 pm to
learn about innovative strategies and tools to conduct meaningful public
involvement with members of underserved communities throughout the
safety planning and project development cycle. Register now.
This session will feature presentations on USDOT’s Promising Practices
for Meaningful Public Involvement in Transportation Decision Making,
tools from the Vision Zero Network, and noteworthy strategies from
State, Regional and Local agencies.
31
Webinar: FHWA Basic Nonresidential Relocation
Under the Uniform Act
September 19th – 26th, 2023
• September 19th – 9:00 am – 12:00 pm PT
• September 21st – 9:00 am – 11:30 am PT
• September 26th – 9:00 am – 12:30 pm PT
The Federal Highway Administration’s National Highway Institute (NHI) is now offering Basic
Nonresidential Relocation Under the Uniform Act (FHWA-NHI-141056) training. This course consists of
both Web-based training (WBT) and Web-conference training (WCT). Learners will focus on
understanding the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act) and its
regulation’s sensitivity toward nonresidential displaced persons to ensure they are treated fairly,
consistently, equitably, and do not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of Federal or federally
assisted projects.
Point of Contact:Blair D’Amato, Course Coordinator
Register on the NHI website!
32
National Highway
Institute Upcoming
Virtual Trainings
October 2-17, 2023
Basic Residential Relocation Under the
Uniform Act
Transportation professionals will develop
a deeper appreciation for the Uniform Act
and its implementing regulations to
ensure that persons displaced as a result
of Federal or federally assisted projects do
no suffer disproportionate injuries as a
result, and are treated fairly, consistently,
equitably. Participants will engage in
interesting case studies that prompt
diligent application of the law and
regulations; and enable participants to
advance their knowledge, skills, and
abilities to hone relocation program
expertise for in-practice application
33
National Highway
Institute Upcoming
Virtual Trainings
October 24-26, 2023
Practical Applications in Federal-Aid Highway Program
Appraisals
This course helps improve conformity with appraisal
requirements of the Uniform Act .
•Participants explore examples of problems handled
differently than typical mortgage appraisal assignments.
•The course is broken into three WCT sessions
averaging two hours and 10 minutes each. At the end of
each session, participants will complete a web-based,
multiple-choice assessment to measure achievement of
the learning outcomes. This course has been certified
by the International Distance Education Certification
Center (IDECC).
•If you have questions, please contact NHI
at nhicustomerservice@dot.gov or 877.558.6873.34
Questions?
35
AGENDA ITEM 10
Agenda Item 10
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Jillian Guizado, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT: California Transportation Commission Meeting Highlights: May, June, and
August 2023
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is to receive and file the May, June, and August 2023 California Transportation
Commission (CTC) meeting highlights.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
May 17 – 18, 2023 CTC Meeting (Agenda)
Nothing notable to report.
June 28 – 29, 2023 CTC Meeting (Agenda)
TAB 16 2022 Solutions for Congested Corridors Program Adoption – Program of Projects
TAB 17 2022 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program Adoption – Program of Projects
TAB 18 2022 Local Partnership Competitive Program Adoption – Program of Projects
TAB 19 Adoption of the 2023 Active Transportation Program Metropolitan Planning
Organization Component for Nine of Ten Large Metropolitan Planning
Organizations
TAB 20 Draft 2024 State Transportation Improvement Program and Aeronautics Account
Fund Estimates
August 16 – 17, 2023 CTC Meeting (Agenda)
TAB 17 Adoption of the 2024 State Transportation Improvement Program and
Aeronautics Account Fund Estimates
TAB 20 Senate Bill 1121 State and Local Transportation Needs Assessment
TAB 21 Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment
36
AGENDA ITEM 1 1
Agenda Item 11
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Jillian Guizado, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT: RCTC Commission Meeting Highlights: May, June, and July 2023
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is to receive and file the May, June, and July 2023 Commission meeting highlights.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
May 2023 Commission Meeting (Agenda)
ITEM 7G Amend the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Toll Services Contract with Kapsch
TrafficCom USA Inc. to Implement Dynamic Pricing on the 91 Express Lanes
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Change Order No. 33 to Agreement No. 16-31-043-00 for the
Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project with Kapsch TrafficCom USA Inc. to
implement Dynamic Pricing on the 91 Express Lanes in the amount of
$3,191,086, plus a contingency amount of $223,559, for an additional amount
of $3,414,645;
2) Authorize the Executive Director or Designee to approve contingency work as
may be required for the Project; and
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the change order No. 33 to Agreement No. 16-31-043-00 on behalf of
the Commission.
ITEM 7J Agreement for Completion of Project Approval/Environmental Document for the
State Route 91 Eastbound Corridor Operations Project
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Award Agreement No. 23-31-041-00 with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc.
to provide project approval/environmental document for the State Route 91
Eastbound Corridor Operations Project in the amount of $3,464,514, plus a
contingency amount of $346,451, for a total amount not to exceed
$3,810,965;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
37
Agenda Item 11
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work
up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services.
ITEM 7K Agreement for On-Call Railway Flagging Services for the Riverside County
Transportation Commission’s Highway and Expressway Projects Encroaching in
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Award Agreement No. 23-31-061-00 to RailPros, Inc., to provide on-call
Railway Flagging Services for Riverside County Transportation Commission’s
current and future highway and/or expressway projects or activities of the
Commission within the right of way owned or operated by Burlington
Northern Santa Fe, for a three-year term, and one, two-year option to extend
the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $2,400,000; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement and optional two-year term on behalf of the
Commission.
Item 8 Approval of VanClub Vanpool Program Subsidy Increase and Amendments to
Leasing Vendor Agreements
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve VanClub program vanpool subsidy increase from $400 a month per
vanpool to $600 a month per vanpool, effective July 1, 2023;
2) Approve Agreement No. 21-41-021-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No.
21-41-021-00 with Airport Van Rental to revise the monthly subsidy amount
to $600, effective July 1, 2023, with no change to the term or agreement
amount;
3) Approve Agreement No. 18-41-038-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No.
18-41-038-00 with California Vanpool Authority to revise the monthly subsidy
amount to $600, effective July 1, 2023, with no change to the term or
agreement amount;
4) Approve Agreement No. 18-45-063-04, Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No.
18-45-063-00 with Commute with Enterprise to revise the monthly subsidy
amount to $600, effective July 1, 2023, with no change to the term or
agreement amount; and
5) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission
June 2023 Commission Meeting (Agenda)
ITEM 6 Public Hearing – Proposed Fiscal Year 2023/24 Budget
38
Agenda Item 11
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Receive input on the proposed Fiscal Year 2023/24 Budget;
2) Approve the salary schedule effective July 13, 2023, located in Appendix B of
the proposed FY 2023/24 Budget;
3) Authorize the expenditure of $523,400 of 91 Express Lanes toll revenues
designated as surplus in accordance with the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds
Indenture to fund Commission costs related to the development of
agreements specific to the funding, construction, operations, maintenance,
and use of toll revenues for the future direct, tolled connector linking the
SR-241 toll road to the 91 Express Lanes;
4) Close the public hearing on the proposed FY 2023/24 Budget on June 14, 2023;
and
5) Adopt the proposed FY 2023/24 Budget.
ITEM 7H Fiscal Years 2023/24 – 2027/28 Measure A Five-Year Capital Improvement Plans
for the Local Streets and Roads Program
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve the Fiscal Years 2023/24 – 2027/28 Measure A Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads as submitted by the
participating agencies.
ITEM 11 2023 Western Riverside County Regional Arterials Call for Projects Funding
Recommendations
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve the funding recommendations in Attachment 1 for 2009 Western
Riverside County Measure A Regional Arterial and Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee Regional Arterial Funds;
2) Direct staff to prepare and execute funding agreements with the project
sponsors to outline the project schedule and local funding commitments; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the funding agreements with the
project sponsors, pursuant to legal counsel review.
July 2023 Commission Meeting (Agenda)
ITEM 7 Fiscal Year 2023/24 Transportation Development Act Article 3 (SB 821) Call for
Projects – Project Recommendations
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve the funding recommendations in Attachment 1 for Fiscal Year
2023/24 Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Bicycle and Pedestrian
Facilities (SB 821) program funds;
39
Agenda Item 11
2) Direct staff to prepare and execute memorandums of understanding (MOUs)
with the local agencies to outline the project schedules and local funding
commitments; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the MOUs with the local agencies,
pursuant to legal counsel review.
ITEM 10 Presentation – Freeway Service Patrol 30th Anniversary
40
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
BANNING ART VELA Nate Smith
Director of Public Works
BEAUMONT VACANT
BLYTHE
Deputy Public Works Director
Robert Vestal
Assistant Director of Public)
Works
VACANT VACANT
CALIMESA MICHAEL THORNTON
City Engineer
Travis Bradshaw
CALTRANS ALBERT VERGEL DE DIOS Sean Yeung
Acting District Local Assistance Engineer Acting District Local
Assistance Engineer
CANYON LAKE STUART MCKIBBIN Mike Borja
Contract City Engineer Administrative Services
Manager
CATHEDRAL CITY JOHN A. CORELLA Armando Garcia Baldizzone
Director of Engineering/Public Works City Engineer
COACHELLA ANDREW SIMMONS Maritza Martinez
City Engineer Public Works Director
COACHELLA JONATHAN HOY Randy Bowman
VALLEY Director of Transportation Transportation Program
ASSOCIATION OF Manager
GOVERNMENTS
CORONA SAVAT KHAMPHOU Kenny Nguyen
Acting Public Works Director Senior Engineer
DESERT HOT DANIEL PORRAS Nick Haecker
SPRINGS Public Works Director/City Engineer Public Works Manager
VESiL
r c.1,lo►-t 11401...477%-..1
*-72,6F, DI< , imererl ol� oQt Et€duf Ca. py
�ru4R-T 1' EGG ►I�t1`�
VE5,14 136Auvv1Qn-T-C4 • 6d-‘/
SYA.c trp.c.orn
9/18/2023
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER
ALTERNATE
PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
EASTVALE
JIMMY CHUNG
City Engineer
HEMET NOAH RAU
City Engineer
INDIAN WELLS KEN SEUMALO
Public Works Director
1NDIO TIMOTHY T. WASSIL
Public Works Director
JURUPA VALLEY PAUL TOOR
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
LA QUINTA
BRYAN MC KINNEY
Public Works Director/City Engineer
LAKE ELSINORE REMON HABIB
City Engineer
MENIFEE
NICK FIDLER
Public Works Director
MORENO VALLEY MELISSA WALKER
Public Works Director/City Engineer
MURRIETA
NORCO
BOB MOEHLING
Director of Public works/City Engineer
CHAD BLAIS
Public Works Director
Yurhi Choi
Nancy Beltran
Management Assistant
Dina Purvis
Assistant Engineer
Donn Uyeno
Octavio Duran
Assistant City Manager
Julie Mignogna
Management Analyst
Bradley Brophy
City Traffic Engineer
VACANT
Harold Zamora
Assistant City Engineer
Jeff Hitch
Principal Civil Engineer
Ajoce k Roc(
Sam Nelson
Deputy City Engineer/
Deputy Public Works Director
9/18/2023
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER
ALTERNATE
PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
PALM DESERT
PALM SPRINGS
PALO VERDE
VALLEY TRANSIT
AGENCY
PERRIS
MARTIN ALVAREZ
Public Works Director
VACANT
JOEL MONTALVO VACANT
Assistant Director of Engineering Services
K. GEORGE COLANGELI
Transit General Manager
JOHN POURKAZEMI
Contract City Engineer
RANCHO MIRAGE RYAN STENDELL
Director of Public Works
RIVERSIDE
FARSHID MOHAMMADI
Engineering Manager
RIVERSIDE COUNTY MARK LANCASTER
Director of Transportation
RIVERSIDE
TRANSIT AGENCY
SAN JACINTO
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
TEMECULA
KRISTIN WARSINSKI
Director of Planning
TRAVIS RANDEL
Deputy City Manager, Dev Svcs
LUIS GARCIA
Controller/Deputy CFO
PATRICK THOMAS
Director of Public Works
Dale Reynolds
VACANT
VACANT
Gilbert Hernandez
Public Works Department
Mojahed Salama
Deputy Director of
Transportation
Jennifer Nguyen
Planning and Programming
Specialist
Stuart McKibbin
Contract City Engineer
Harman Singh
Deputy Performance Officer
Amer Attar
Principal Civil Engineer
Fags /�' w Ira htirrm
mfe't•Viwac-,
5AIawict&___6vCo_•d( r
$tf►�GiC� �� W1 c \.TVervdesT ra ,corn
�etc � 4 eer.4 1144 ,6Vvi
701-1T;(-)11., r Olpf°
T,wcCL . 1 W
9/18/2023
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER
ALTERNATE
PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
WESTERN
RIVERSIDE
COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS
WILDOMAR
CHRISTOPHER TZENG
Interim Director of Transportation and
Planning
JASON FARAG
Public Works Director
Altos
Dyne- .r?-Aarit
c34018W4tg
ariM,
a Rito
Cameron Brown
Program Manager
Cameron Luna
Associate Engineer
c%RSON i TTY-+ L'1
11c111SSki Ir✓
cal -6%6464i ocwil yow►ar. a��q
rrxan SSr .- &W.
9/18/2023
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE and EMAIL
BANNING ART VELA Nate Smith
Director of Public Works Deputy Public Works Director
BEAUMONT VACANT Robert Vestal
Assistant Director of Public
Works
BLYTHE VACANT VACANT
CALIMESA MICHAEL THORNTON Travis Bradshaw
City Engineer
CALTRANS ALBERT VERGEL DE DIOS Sean Yeung
Acting District Local Assistance Engineer Acting District Local
Assistance Engineer
CANYON LAKE STUART MCKIBBIN Mike Borja
Contract City Engineer Administrative Services
CATHEDRAL CITY JOHN A. CORELLA
Director of Engineering/Public Works
COACHELLA ANDREW SIMMONS
Manager
Armando Garcia Baldizzone
City Engineer
Maritza Martinez
City Engineer Public Works Director
COACHELLA JONATHAN HOY Randy Bowman
VALLEY Director of Transportation Transportation Program
ASSOCIATION OF Manager
GOVERNMENTS
CORONA SAVAT KHAMPHOU Kenny Nguyen
Acting Public Works Director Senior Engineer
J 4w1 A. CAx L. .A
Afziropecio 6. 1
rlI I �1'f L UJ
DESERT HOT DANIEL PORRAS Nick Haecker
SPRINGS Public Works Director/City Engineer Public Works Manager
(L.4-
9/12/2023
Pa Irt P15e t Loc ►io rn
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER
ALTERNATE
PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
EASTVALE
HEMET
JIMMY CHUNG
City Engineer
NOAH RAU
City Engineer
INDIAN WELLS KEN SEUMALO
Public Works Director
INDIO
TIMOTHY T. WASSIL
Public Works Director
JURUPA VALLEY PAUL TOOR
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
LA QUINTA
BRYAN MC KINNEY
Public Works Director/City Engineer
LAKE ELSINORE REMON HABIB
City Engineer
MENIFEE
NICK FIDLER
Public Works Director
MORENO VALLEY MELISSA WALKER
Public Works Director/City Engineer
MURRIETA
NORCO
Yurhi Choi
Nancy Beltran
Management Assistant
Dina Purvis
Assistant Engineer
Donn Uyeno
Octavio Duran
Assistant City Manager
Julie Mignogna
Management Analyst
Bradley Brophy
City Traffic Engineer
VACANT
Harold Zamora
Assistant City Engineer
BOB MOEHLING
Director of Public works/City Engineer
CHAD BLAIS
Public Works Director
Jeff Hitch
Principal Civil Engineer
Sam Nelson
Deputy City Engineer/
Deputy Public Works Director
5674-M, 4L o
pole kkVf D
X 5 Ewro►4 t od ogeof • re vegtL S . Ca.ti.
etimpto e titailo, 0�
2,),044 e/ &$c)in-/c&a,,'oV
9/12/2023
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER
ALTERNATE
PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
PALM DESERT
MARTIN ALVAREZ
Public Works Director
PALM SPRINGS
PALO VERDE
VALLEY TRANSIT
AGENCY
PERRIS
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE
JOEL MONTALVO
Assistant Director of Engineering Services
K. GEORGE COLANGELI
Transit General Manager
JOHN POURKAZEMI
Contract City Engineer
RYAN STENDELL
Director of Public Works
FARSHID MOHAMMADI
Engineering Manager
RIVERSIDE COUNTY MARK LANCASTER
Director of Transportation
RIVERSIDE
TRANSIT AGENCY
SAN JACINTO
KRISTIN WARSINSKI
Director of Planning
TRAVIS RANDEL
Deputy City Manager, Dev Svcs
SUNLINE TRANSIT LUIS GARCIA
AGENCY Controller/Deputy CFO
TEMECULA
PATRICK THOMAS
Director of Public Works
VACANT
VACANT
Dale Reynolds
VACANT
VACANT
Gilbert Hernandez
Public Works Department
Mojahed Salama
Deputy Director of
Transportation
Jennifer Nguyen
Planning and Programming
Specialist
Stuart McKibbin
Contract City Engineer
Harman Singh
Deputy Performance Officer
Amer Attar
Principal Civil Engineer
>IttiLk 1I Avlocikki,
Pi r‘
J 1/
(90100k6)uolme,
9/12/2023
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 18, 2023
AGENCY
TAC MEMBER
ALTERNATE
PRINT NAME
SIGNATURE and EMAIL
WESTERN
RIVERSIDE
COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS
WILDOMAR
CHRISTOPHER TZENG Cameron Brown
Interim Director of Transportation and Program Manager
Planning
JASON FARAG
Public Works Director
Cameron Luna
Associate Engineer
9/12/2023