The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2021-07-01 EA Scoping Meeting PacketPine Creek Environmental Assessment Scoping Meeting - July 1, 2021 • Introductions • Review and refinement of the draft scope of work o Objectives for work o What is missing? o What is unclear? o What needs revisions? o integration of public comments • Timing and schedule • Communication Protocols o Among the participants o With the public o Contact information • Next Steps Pine Creek Ranch Environmental Assessment Scoping Meeting - July 1, 2021 Name Alt i✓ of - - o bD _ rt1tA 1 ur ora� can 5Irbv,c- - l(u4e ZCu�h l�n ENDwitive. daI& Mi&k-e Gw-evvevcf (10 aryl (o nss u es ge.. Groot* via NA -17.,001A5 ohmrf 3 d -vavt �yT Company/Agency C./ VII a ik4 CCA LL-ArttirkterlaZa i f • ;el. VS E-mail c G. '1C -14F /, , L : u 5 ccOl.:c�.us Phone t-6311 - 3`i % iCvmwLiwi l_Aoff, Zog 4$3 93 Sr. #7(a. u - taakna.i •r,nts' 9.oS- *AV -a/Z ,nvp . rc LiZ3 Ft.c.cALL t? - [�3 u -Szz -(sit-wk Sc,r -5 dnsca[ e osrsfe Su4, oces,c6 708 •371 z337 #RK-4 t1 �lrFn� r rco “o„ecE) ar+-P fbkie. , (2og) - 7b9f Psu-i. 0 ",it Ar.►�fop�.e•et s.L.6n.i4 .,z,i0 .)l.0 • 1 (NM) Std - 1946 6i:-1-11 of -Mc -6d( C�- -�[ �eS ryk .lG�vs��Qrec�rl;�e-° (7A-1) E64 -414fl 06/23/21 Comments related to Resolution 21-25 — Area of Concern 1 6/19/21 15:3D:24 Thomas & Kathryn Kilgore 674 Koski Dr. McCall, ID 83638, P.O. Box 1368, McCall, ID 83638 "We respectfully, request the McCall City Council to adopt Resolution 21-25 at the June 24, 2021 City Council Meeting. As home owners in the Woodlands immediately adjacent to the proposed development, we have several concerns about the development including: traffic, ingress and egress, emergency egress, effects on water pressure for current homeowners, construction traffic and noise, loss of wildlife habitat which includes nesting Piliated Woodpeckers, and wetlands, children walking to and from school, narrowed streets during winter months and no current plans for open space or buffer between existing homes and new homes in the proposed development." 2 6/19/21 17:D3:32 Bob Wilkinson 678 Koski Drive, McCall, 10 83638 "I would like to weigh in on the proposed development in the Woodlands. There are a number of issues surrounding this development that I would like to address. The primary access to and from this new development will be, as proposed, an Woodlands drive. As there is no sidewalk and as there are many children living on the Woodlands Drive this is a major safety concern. Adding a few hundred cars a day to the Woodlands Drive will have a major impact on bath safety and the environment. An environmental impact study would show the relative harm the added traffic would have on the community. In addition, the wildlife would be affected both in the new and the existing areas. When does development and open space collide? Are we to put houses on every plot of land without trying to preserve the natural state of nature that we came hereto enjoy. When is enough enough? Thanks, Bob Wilkinson" i 3 6/21/21 8:10:00 Kristen McCoy 676 Koski Dr McCall, ID "I am writing to support the City staff recommendation to designate the proposed 158 -acre Pine Creek Ranch development as an area of critical concern. I would also like to express my concern with the proposed Pine Creek Rach development as currently planned. Woodlands Drive would be the primary route to the development, though it's not developed for such a drastic increase in traffic. Since there are no sidewalks or pathways, the street is used frequently by children and families to get to/from school. I fully support the City's proposed requirement to conduct an environmental assessment as part of the development application review process. This process would allow the developer to understand the existing environmental resources, and revise the plans to reduce adverse impacts. By doing this research and minimising impacts to the environment, everyone benefits including those within the future development, adjacent neighborhoods, and entire community of McCall. This is a step that the City should absolutely require before approving any development plans for this area. " 4 6/21/21 11:21:42 Phillip and Sandra Brug 628 Woodlands Drive, Pa Box 3367 "We, Phillip and Sandra Brug, residents of The Woodlands at 628 Woodlands Drive, strongly support the designation of Pine Creek Ranch development as an Area of Critical Concern. 06/23/21 Comments related to Resolution 21-25 — Area of Concern Our primary concern is the safety of children and elderly residents on Woodlands Drive. There are no sidewalks an Woodlands Drive. Children and parents walk to and from school, bike, and recreate using the street itself year around. As elderly residents, we use the road for walking, exercise, and access to the Spring Mountain Bike and Pedestrian path. The Pine Creek Ranch development will increase pedestrian traffic as well as vehicle traffic on Woodlands Drive. Woodlands Drive is now at maximum capacity for safety. There is no curbside parking. The street is frequently partially blocked by service and delivery vehicles. The current speed limit of 20 mph is consistently ignored. In winter, the high snow walls limit visibility and force pedestrians and traffic together. The increased residential traffic from the Pine Creek Ranch subdivision, as well as the transportation and infrastructure vehicles used for the development and maintenance of the subdivision, will pose a physical threat to the residents of both The Woodlands and the Pine Creek Ranch. Please vote to designate Pine Creek Subdivision as an Area of Critical Concern. Thank you, Phillip and Sandra Brug" 5 6/21/21 12:33:37 Jeff McCoy 676 Koski Dr "I am writing to support the City staff recommendation to designate the proposed 158 -acre Pine Creek Ranch development as an area of critical concern. I would also like to express my concern with the proposed Pine Creek Ranch development as currently planned. Woodlands Drive would be the primary route to the development, though it's not developed for such a drastic increase in traffic. Since there are no sidewalks or pathways, the street is used frequently by children and families to get to/from school. I fully support the City's proposed requirement to conduct an environmental assessment as part of the development application review process. This process would allow the developer to understand the existing environmental resources, and revise the plans to reduce adverse impacts. By doing this research and minimizing impacts to the environment, everyone benefits including those within the future development, adjacent neighborhoods, and entire community of McCall. This is a step that the City should absolutely require before approving any development plans for this area." 6 6/21/21 16:50:37 Jim & Deb Broich 613 Woodlands St, McCall ID "We support the designation as an ""Area of Critical Concern"" for the following reasons: 1. Traffic. Woodlands is only access point for the neighborhood and increased congestion will create potential safety and noise issues for the residents. Increased traffic will result in degradation of existing road and presents a risk to wildlife in area. 2. A main access paint off Deinhard should be mandatory. 3. Need sidewalks, bike lanes and general widening of road for this to work." 06/23/21 Comments related to Resolution 21-25 — Area of Concern 7 6/21/21 18:03:24 Margie Elliott In support of the Pine Creek Ranch "An Area of Critical Concern" Resolution. My husband and I have lived at 661 Woodlands Drive for 11 years. Gradually during that period the character of the neighborhood has changed from vacation / 2cd homes to permanent residences of working, young families. Our major concern is the sheer volume of additional traffic jeopardizing the safety of children walking to and from the elementary and middle schools, the pool, tennis and volleyball courts and common area, walkers, joggers, folks walking their pets. All of the interactions that make this small part of McCall a comfortable, friendly community to live in. Other issues....The narrowed streets during winter, wildlife, so many concerns. Environmental Assessment for Pine Creek Ranch Objectives: • To fulfill the requirements of MCC 9.7.08 for the completion of an environmental assessment plan by an interdisciplinary team of professionals. • To undertake a comprehensive analysis of the natural and built environment of the Pine Creek Ranch properties and its surroundings that is contained within one document. ▪ To facilitate discussion and coordination among the applicant, public officials and the public through an integrated analysis of the environmental conditions affecting the site. • To identify the environmental opportunities and constraints for development that balances the various and competing interests for private development and the public interest. • To provide the framework for the efficient review and decisions on the land use application for the site. Natural Environment 1. Earth a. General description of the site. Is the site flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, or other? b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck? Specify the classification of agricultural soils and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. d. Are there indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Are there any indication of filling or excavation in the past? f. Could soil loss or erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Are there any significant rock outcroppings or unique features? h. What are the opportunities and constraints for using the existing land conditions to influence the location, intensity, and design of future development on the site? 2. Water a. Surface Water: 1) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the development require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description and purpose. 3) Does the site lie within a FEMA designated floodway or floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 4) What are the opportunities or constraints from surface waters to preserve open space and/or to create natural linkages for pedestrian trail? b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any. 1iPage 3) What overall impacts to the local aquifer system would he anticipated with development? c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other bodies of water? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 3) Would development of the site affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. 4) Describe how stormwater runoff from increased impervious areas created by this project are planned on being mitigated. 3. Plants a. What types of vegetation are found on the site, including deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs, grasses, pasture, wet soil plants, water plants or other? b. Wha: percentage of the site is forested? c. Are there significant stands of trees or large individual trees on the site? Please locate on a site plan. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. e. Is there evidence of any insect or fungus driven vegetation infection or die -off on or adjacent to the property? (I.e. bark beetle infestation, dwarf mistletoe, blister rust etc.) 4. Wildlife a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. What seasonality is expected and was observed for each species? b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? Identify yes or no for each species previously identified and explain. d. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. If yes, identify possible resources for guidance on local management practices e. Describe opportunities for preserving wildlife habitat on the site. 5. Climate a. Identify the current land -based greenhouse gas emissions and/or removals (and/or Net Ecosystem Productivity, NEP). What classifications of land cover are present? What proportion of the property is covered by each land cover type? What is the approximate Ghg Emission/Removal value for each land cover type in Tons Cale/acre. b. What change to land -cover and emissions/removals can be anticipated after development is complete? What is the estimated difference in emissions/removals from the present condition compared to development completion? I.e. change in emissions due to project implementation. c. Based on traffic study information and local fuel efficiency data what would the expected Greenhouse Gas Emissions per unit, per year be following development? How would you design the project to reduce the need for vehicle trips and other emissions generating activities for residents? d. What emissions can be expected (approximately) from the construction process? (operation of machinery, transportation of workers, manufacture and transportation of building materials, efficiency of structures built in project, etc.). 2) Page How can development of the site be designed to take advantage of the natural environment, preserving natural features such as streamside environments, intermittent streams, wetlands, wildlife habitat and vegetation? Built Environment -Community Context 1. Land Use a. What is the historical and existing land use of the property? b. Describe any structures on the site. Will the structures be demolished? c. What are the current uses of adjacent properties? How will the development of this site affect adjacent properties? d. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands, including by historic indigenous populations? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? e. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how? f. What is the current zoning classification of the site? g. What is the current comprehensive plan designation and policy direction for the future of the site? h. What subdivision and PUD regulations apply to the property? 2. Transportation a. Identify the existing street network adjacent to the site, the functional classification and carrying capacity of existing streets. Assess the alternatives for access to the site in terms of capacity, safety, impacts on adjacent properties, direct access, cost, and multimodal potential. Show on a site plan. b. Are there any planned street improvements to the streets that could serve the site? Describe any other that would be necessary to accommodate development of the site. c. Identify the existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and street crossings. This should include informal connections such as "desire paths." Locate on a site plan. d. Describe and show which phase of the project each planned street improvement, pedestrian and bike facility will be constructed in. With a phased plan, also describe how the improvements will be ended in the interim until all phases are constructed. e. Is the site directly served by public transportation? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit route? Describe the frequency and span of any nearby transit routes and significant useful locations accessed. 3. Housing a. What are the existing housing market and trends for the city and region? b. What are the opportunities in development of this site to satisfy market demand? 4. Utilities a. What utilities are planned to serve the site? b. What is the availability and capacity of existing water and sewer services? c. Are there planned improvements or what improvements would be needed to serve the site? L 31 Page 5. Public Safety a. What are the existing service levels and jurisdiction providing service to the site? b. What would be the response time far service? c. Are there any known public safety issues on or near the site? 6. Schools: a. What is the availability of school and capacity to serve the site? b. What is the availability of daycare facilities and capacity to serve the site? 7. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? if so, describe. c. What are recreation opportunities that could be provided by the project? 8. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Native American or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. 9. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy {electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar} will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? b. What kinds of energy conservation features could be included in the design of the development? c. List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. 10. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that exist on the site? b. What are the current sources of light or glare on or adjacent to the site? Could light or glare from the development be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What are the current sources of noise on or adjacent to the site? Could noise from the development be a safety hazard? d. What are the current conditions that make this site prone to wildland fires? What are the considerations that should be made in the design of future site development to mitigate the impacts from wildland fire? What are the existing and planned evacuation strategies for the area in the event of a catastrophic fire event? How can development of this site be adequately served to minimize public costs and impacts on existing development? 41'agc Process Steps 1. Scoping meeting. 2. Revised scope of work. 3. Ten-day public comment on scope of work. 4. ❑raft preparation by consultants 5. One -week draft review and approval by City. 6. Ten-day distribution of environmental assessment and public meeting to discuss the implications of the analysis. 7. Staff recommendations to applicant on development proposal. SIPage