HomeMy Public PortalAboutSonfield_Sheree_ Woodlands_Access Options all pages[2] 20210525't7
-1. • •
f1.
a F r ,
Harr
rrrr � � �' tia�arck
LLB- ■1EM_ T+.1.-
pod "1
LrAtill'"entrig 11
-V7171Yar‘NO
, "krognilir3.!'t\tir
'4 t
. 4 1I irei
goibillAA ting
. , ,
,,,,,
. ---461.- MO 4 k JA
_- ..o...__ _ '
1 4+ 'r +�' -t ilotle t
/14 * e 1
,v,.%:i
is
.
r‘ Ind
riA tA
; .
11 et& IF"m4 •
"t. Nt' 1121111 t
rrcc�cn- a—
School roadways width = 26 feet
Fox Ridge Lane width = 24 feet
Woodlands Dr. width = 23 feet except
Woodlands width at worst curve=22 feet
Pathways Master Plan
School roadway to
corner of 90 acre fence
approx 225 feet
Roadways are 26 feet wide; Corner of 90 acre property line to roadway is 225 feet
Pathways master plan
PINE CREEK RANCH: ACCESS OPTIONS
Option Width Surface/Character Pathways Other Considerations
A School ROW* 26’ Asphalt; Generally straight, flat to
point of extension along southerly
border
Elementary to Middle
separate path exists;
south of roadway along
southern border
planned (per Pathways
Master Plan)
Where roadway leaves southerly border to curve north to
Elementary Parking Lot, fence line of 90 acre parcel is
about 225 feet, see photos attached
B Fox Ridge Lane 24’ Asphalt; Straight, flat, w 1 right turn
None Route would pass approx. 21 driveways
C Woodlands Dr. 23’;
22’@
corner
Asphalt; Curves with sections of
incline greater than Options A,B
None, no space Route would pass approx. 62 driveways on Woodlands
and another approx. 53 driveways on other roads of The
Woodlands; current snow storage at stub roads would be
lost if PCR roads and WHOA roads are connected, see
photos and list of winter safety hazards attached
D Stockton Ct Dirt; county road
None Residents of PCR would not use this access, they would
use other options above that are much more direct and
are paved
E Knights Rd. Asphalt; county road
None Residents of PCR would not use this access, they would
use other options above that are much more direct
* CITY OF MCCALL DOCUMENT REFERENCES:
At the July 14, 1994 City Council meeting, the CUP was approved for the Middle School :
Item 19 e of the CUP dated June 22, 1994: “The Applicant shall contract to dedicate the southernmost 35 feet of the tract to the public for Deinhard Lane at such time a s
Deinhard Lane is proposed to be extended to the east of the subject property, but is n ot precluded thereby from using the same for access road construction; no City snow
plowing of this or any other on -the -site road should be anticipated.”
Item 8 of the CUP dated June 22, 1994: “The southerly property line of this tract would be the cent erline of an easterly extension of Deinhard Lane, should lands to the east and
south be developed in a pattern making the extension of Deinhard desirable . Deinhard at this location would be classified as a collector street, which would require a 70 foot
right-of-way.”
City Council Minutes July 14, 1994, CUP adopted with a few exceptions, including Item VII B 2 (i): “That the condition to provide ROW the extension of Deinhard Lane be modified
to dedicate ROW at such time as Deinhard Lane is proposed to be e xtended.”
From Roadway to 90 acre parcel fence is approx. 225 feet:
Woodlands Drive in Winter
• Roadway is even more narrow in winter
• Sight lines for entry/exiting driveways is very poor
• Numerous “near misses” have been reported at the curve
• Becomes a one-lane road if anyone parks on the street for any length of time
• Big vehicles/toy haulers are especially problematic
• Larger vehicles (eg City plow) and a car cannot pass safely, especially on the curve
• At Spring Mountain, Woodlands can be passable while at the other end it is severely rutted and difficult to maneuver
into/out of driveways and around obstacles (sun is very different at opposite ends)
• The wider the road is plowed, the higher the banks, and the worse the visibility
• Current snow storage locations that are now at the stub roads would be eliminated if The Woodlands roads are
connected to the proposed Pine Creek Ranch, making snow removal and issues even more problematic