HomeMy Public PortalAbout2015.097 (06-16-15)RESOLUTION NO. 2015.097
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE LOS ANGELES GATEWAY REGION INTEGRATED REGIONAL
WATER MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND THE CITIES OF
DOWNEY, LAKEWOOD, LYNWOOD, PARAMOUNT, PICO RIVERA, SIGNAL HILL,
SOUTH GATE, LONG BEACH, AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING TO PREPARE
AND IMPLEMENT A WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND
COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM (CIMP) AS REQUIRED BY
THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, LOS ANGELES REGION,
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM MUNICIPAL
SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM PERMIT ORDER NO R4- 2012 -0175
MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM WATER SYSTEM
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2012, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board transmitted the final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit and waste discharge
requirements for storm water and non -storm water discharges from the MS4 within the
coastal watersheds of Los Angeles County, which was adopted by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) at its
meeting on November 8, 2012; and
WHEAREAS, MS4 Permit requires dischargers to comply with all of the terms,
requirements, and conditions of the MS4 Permit and comply with effluent standards or
prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) for toxic
pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal within the time frame
provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions; and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2013, the City Council approved a Memorandum of
Understanding between the Los Angeles Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water
Management Joint Powers Authority and the Cities of Downey, Lakewood, Long Beach,
Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill, South Gate and the Los Angeles County
Flood Control District for administration and cost sharing to prepare a Watershed
Management Program; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2014, the City Council approved the submittal of the
LLAR's draft WMP and CIMP to the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
(Regional Board); and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2015, the Regional Board approved LLAR's WMP with
conditions; and
WHEREAS, the WMP requires implementation of a wide range of "control
measures," including monitoring; and
WHEREAS, it is more cost effective to share cost to implement the WMP.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Council approves the First Amendment to the
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Los Angeles Gateway Region Integrated
Regional Management Joint Powers Authority and the Cities of Downey, Lakewood,
Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill, South Gate, Long Beach, and the Los
Angeles County Flood Control District attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 2. That the City Council authorizes the City Manager execute the
above mentioned Agreement.
Section 3. That the City Council authorizes the appropriation of $10,789 to
$97,097 from the unappropriated Water Fund each year, according to the cost - sharing
formula included in the above mentioned Agreement, to the Storm Water Division
Account (457).
Section 4. This Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of June, 2015.
ATTEST:
Maria Quinonez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Da�A A. Garcia, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
J. Arnoldo Beltran, City Manager
William E. Stracker, RE Director
Public Works/ City Engineer
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of June, 2015.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ALATORRE, HERNANDEZ, SANTILLAN -BEAS
AND SOLACHE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER CASTRO
ABSTAIN: NONE
aria Quinonez, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and the Clerk of the City Council
of said City, do hereby certify that the above foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
Resolution No. 2015.097 on file in my office and that said Resolution was adopted on
the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this 16th day of June, 2015.
r
i
Maria Quinonez, City Clerk
EHIBIT A
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE LOS ANGELES GATEWAY REGION INTEGRATED REGIONAL
WATER MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND THE CITIES OF DOWNEY,
LAKEWOOD, LYNWOOD, PARAMOUNT, PICO RIVERA, SIGNAL HILL, SOUTH GATE, LONG
BEACH, AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
FOR
ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING TO PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ( "WMP ") and COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING
PROGRAM ( "CIMP ") AS REQUIRED BY THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD,
LOS ANGELES REGION, NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM PERMIT ORDER NO. R4- 2012 -0175
MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM ( "MS4 PERMIT ")
This FIRST AMENDMENT to the memorandum of understanding ( "MOU ") is made
and entered into as of the date of the last signature set forth below, by and between the Los
Angeles Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water Management Joint Powers Authority
( "GWMA "), a California Joint Powers Authority, and the Cities of Downey, Lakewood,
Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill, South Gate, Long Beach ( "Cities "), and the
Los Angeles County Flood Control District ( "LACFCD "):
1. Recitals. This FIRST AMENDMENT is made with the respect to the following
facts and purposes:
A. For the purposes of this First Amendment, the term "Watershed Permittees"
shall mean the Cities of Downey, Lakewood, Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill,
South Gate, Long Beach, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District; and
B. The Watershed Permittees and GWMA are collectively referred to as the
"PARTIES "; and
C. On August 1, 2013, the PARTIES entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding between the Los Angeles Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water
Management Joint Powers Authority and the Cities of Downey, Lakewood, Lynwood,
Paramount, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill, South Gate, Long Beach, and the Los Angeles County
Flood Control District for Administration and Cost Sharing to Prepare a Watershed
Management Program ( "WMP ") and a Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program
( "CIMP "), collectively the "Plans" as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board,
Los Angeles Region, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System Permit, Order No. R4- 2012 -0175 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
System ( "MOU "); and
D. The Watershed Permittees prepared and submitted the Plans to the Regional
Board in compliance with certain elements of the MS4 Permit; and
12664/0004/1834593 -3
EXHIBIT B
Cost Sharing
The Watershed Permittees agree to pay for the cost of preparation and
implementation of the WMP (or EWMP if subsequently designated by the parties)
and the CIMP. The District will pay 10 percent (10 %) of the cost of developing the
WMP (or EWMP) and CIMP. Each remaining Watershed Permittee will pay
according to Table 1. All Watershed Permittees shall pay the 3 percent (3 %) GWMA
administrative costs.
TABLE 1
Cost Sharing Table through submittal of WMP on or before June 28, 2014
WMP /CIMP $657,40_0
TOTAL $677,122
GWMA Administration (3 %) $19,722
LACFCD Allocation (10 %) $67,712
Distributed Cost $609,410
20 percent of
80 percent of
% of
TOTAL
Area
Distributed Cost
Distributed Cost
Agency
(sq mi)
al
Total
proportioned
proportioned
Per
Area
equally
based on area
Agency
g y
Downey
5.54
12.7%
$13,542
$61,777
$75,320
Lakewood
0.08
0.2%
$13,542
$892
$14,435
Long Beach
19.22
44.0%
$13,542
$214,325
$227,867
Lynwood
4.84
11.1%
$13,542
$53,972
$67,514
Paramount
3.12
7.1%
$13,542
$34,792
$48,334
Pico Rivera
2.36
5.4%
$13,542
$26,317
$39,859
Signal Hill
1.21
2.8%
$13,542
$13,493
$27,035
South Gate
7.35
16.8%
$13,542
$81,961
$95,503
Caltrans'
TBD
TBD
$13,542
TBD
$13,542
TOTAL
43.72
1 100%
$108,340
f $487,528
$609,410
;VOTES:
• 1 Caltrans cost sharing will be determined if Caltrans enters into the MOU. Each agency's total will be adjusted
accordingly.
• Unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County are not participants in this MOU.
• Watershed Permittees and the cost share are subject to modifications due to, but not limited to, changes in the
number of participating agencies, refinements in mapping, and changes in boundaries.
Page 23 of 27
12664 - 0001 \1599408v4.doc
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
E. The PARTIES now desire to amend the MOU to: (1) add implementation of
the Plans to the scope and purpose of the MOU; and (2) provide a separate cost -share
formula for the implementation of the Plans, subject to annual budget approval, in
accordance with each PARTY'S cost share allocations set forth in Exhibit "B1" ( "Cost Share
Formula for Preparation of the Plans ") and Exhibit "132" ( "Cost Share Formula for
Implementation of the Plans ") which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
F. The Parties have determined that authorizing GWMA to hire a consultant to
implement the Plans will be beneficial to the Parties; and
G. The Parties desire to collaboratively prepare a Scope of Work and Request
for Proposals to obtain a consultant to assist the Parties with implementation required by
the Plans.
The PARTIES agree that the following provisions of the MOU shall be amended as follows:
2. Section 1 of the MOU entitled "Recitals" is hereby amended by adding thereto
Recitals A -G of Section 1 of this First Amendment, which is set forth in Section 1 of this First
Amendment and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
3. Section 2 of the MOU entitled "Purpose" is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this MOU is to cooperatively support
and undertake preparation of the Plans and any additional services, including but not
limited to implementation of the WMP and the CIMP, except for construction of regional
BMP projects as agreed to by the Watershed Permittees working cooperatively as the
Lower Los Angeles River ( "LLAR ") Watershed Committee and as approved by the GWMA.
For the purposes of this MOU, the term "regional BMP projects" does not include individual
cities' low impact development ( "LID ") projects, including LID or Green Streets projects."
4. Section 3 of the MOU entitled "Cooperation" is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 3. Cooperation. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another to
achieve the purposes of this MOU. The Watershed Permittees shall prepare a final Scope of
Work and Request for Proposals /Qualifications to seek and hire a consultant to assist the
Parties with implementation of the Plans, and GWMA shall assist with soliciting proposals
from consultants to implement the Plans and shall administer said consultants' contracts."
5. Section 6 of the MOU entitled "Term" is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 6. Term. This MOU shall remain and continue in effect until September
30, 2020, unless sooner terminated as provided herein."
6. Section 8 of the MOU entitled "Role of the GWMA" is hereby amended in its entirety
to read as follows:
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
"Section 8. Responsibilities of the Parties.
a) Responsibilities of the GWMA. The GWMA agrees to: (i) solicit proposals for
preparation and implementation of the Plans; (ii) administer the selected
consultants' ( "Consultants ") contracts in accordance with the Scopes of Work
prepared by the Watershed Permittees; and (iii) serve as a conduit for paying
the Consultants, as approved and funded by the Watershed Permittees.
b) Responsibilities of the LLAR Watershed Committee. The LLAR Watershed
Committee agrees to:
i. LACFCD Facilities /Mass Emissions Stations. Obtain any necessary
permits from LACFCD for access to and construction within LACFCD storm
drains, channels, catch basins, and similar properties ( "Facilities "), and
provide written notice 72 hours in advance of entry to LACFCD's Facilities. If
approved by the GWMA, the GWMA may obtain this permit as identified
above.
ii. Supervise Consultants. Supervise the Consultants' preparation and
implementation of the Plans.
iii. Reports. Submit reports to the Regional Board as described in the
Plans and distribute copies of the reports to the Watershed Permittees prior
to submittal to the Regional Board for review and comment. The LLAR
Watershed Committee will provide the Watershed Permittees with an
electronic copy of the draft CIMP Annual Report and completed CIMP Annual
Report within seven (7) business days after receipt from the Consultants. In
addition, the LLAR Watershed Committee will make available to the
Watershed Permittees the data used to prepare the reports. This data will be
available electronically in a Microsoft Excel or equivalent format that
contains the table structure and syntax agreed upon by the LLAR Watershed
Committee.
C) Responsibilities of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District ( "LACFCD ")
LACFCD agrees to:
i. LACFCD Mass Emissions Station (MES) Monitoring. Provide available
monitoring data from the existing Los Angeles River MES, owned and
operated by the LACFCD. Data shall be limited to water column chemistry
and aquatic toxicity.
ii. Access to LACFCD Facilities /Mass Emissions Stations. To grant access
to the LLAR Watershed Committee and /or the GWMA, and its Consultants to
LACFCD Facilities, including LACFCD's Los Angeles River MES, to achieve the
purposes of this MOU, provided the LLAR Watershed Committee and its
CONSULTANT obtain a permit and provide written notice 72 hours in
3
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
advance of entry to LACFCD's Facilities. Access permits will be issued by the
LACFCD at no cost to the Parties and their Consultants. Permits for
construction or installation of structures in LACFCD right of way will incur
fees to cover the cost of review, inspection, etc. by LACFCD.
d) Responsibilities of the Watershed Permittees. The Watershed Permittees
agree to:
Documentation. To make a full -faith effort to cooperate with one
another to achieve the purposes of this MOU by providing all
requested information and documentation in their possession and
available for release to the Consultants that is deemed necessary by
the Parties to implement the Plans.
ii. Access. Each Watershed Permittee will allow reasonable access and
entry to the Parties and their Consultants, on an as needed basis
during the term of this MOU, to each Watershed Permittee's Facilities
to achieve the purposes of this MOU, provided, however, that prior to
entering any of the Watershed Permittee's Facilities, the Consultants
shall obtain a permit and provide written notice 72 hours in advance
of entry from the applicable Watershed Permittee.
iii. Permit. The Watershed Permittees will make a full -faith effort to
work with the Consultants to obtain all necessary permits for
installation of permanent infrastructure or modifications to
stormwater monitoring sites within each Watershed Permittee's
jurisdiction.
7. Section 9 of the MOU entitled "Financial Terms" is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 9. Financial Terms.
a) Each Watershed Permittee shall pay its Proportional Costs as provided in
Exhibit "B1" ( "Cost Share Formula for Preparation of the Plans ") and Exhibit
"B2" ( "Cost Share Formula for Implementation of the Plans ") for Consultants
and any other related expenses to which the Parties may agree in writing.
b) Each Watershed Permittee shall also pay its proportional share of GWMA's
staff time for retaining Consultants and invoicing the Watershed Permittees,
audit expenses and other overhead costs, including reasonable legal fees
( "MOU Costs ") incurred by GWMA in the performance of its duties under this
MOU. GWMA shall add a percentage not to exceed three percent (3 %) to
each invoice submitted to each Watershed Permittee to cover each
Watershed Permittee's share of the MOU Costs. The MOU Costs percentage
shall be set each fiscal year by a vote of the GWMA Board.
4
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
C) GWMA shall submit an invoice to each Watershed Permittee upon selection
of Consultants reflecting each Watershed Permittee's estimated Proportional
Costs of the Consultants' services through the following June 30th. Prior to
releasing payment to Consultants, GWMA shall submit a copy of the
Consultants' invoices to the LLAR Watershed Committee for approval. The
decision regarding whether to pay the invoice shall be communicated to the
GWMA by the Representative.
d) Upon receiving the first and each subsequent invoice, each Watershed
Permittee shall pay its Proportional Costs set forth in that invoice to the
GWMA within forty -five days (45) days of receipt.
e) By March 15th of each year, commencing March 15, 2015, the LLAR
Watershed Committee shall submit to GWMA a recommended budget for the
following fiscal year. GWMA shall consider the recommendation and adopt a
budget by June 301h inclusive of the LLAR Watershed Committee's
recommendation. GWMA will send each Watershed Permittee no later than
June 30th of each year an invoice representing the Watershed Permittee's
Proportional Costs of the adopted budget. GWMA shall not expend funds in
excess of each annual budgeted amount without prior notification to and
approval by the LLAR Watershed Committee.
f) Each Watershed Permittee shall review their recommended Proportional
Costs for the upcoming fiscal year in a timely manner for inclusion in its next
budget cycle or exercise the withdrawal and termination clause as specified
in Section 12.a) of the MOU.
g) A Watershed Permittee will be delinquent if the invoiced payment is within
the budgeted amounts or the amounts authorized by the LLAR Watershed
Committee and such invoiced payment is not received by the GWMA within
forty -five (45) days after the GWMA first sent the invoice. The GWMA will
follow the procedure listed below, or such other procedure that the LLAR
Watershed Committee directs to effectuate payment: 1) verbally contact the
official of the Watershed Permittee with copies to each other Watershed
Permittee to the person and at the address to which notices should be
addressed pursuant to Section 13 of the MOU, and 2) submit a formal letter
from the GWMA Executive Officer to the Watershed Permittee. If payment is
not received within sixty (60) days following the due date, the GWMA may
terminate the MOU unless the City Managers /Administrators of the
Watershed Permittees in good standing inform the GWMA in writing that
their respective Watershed Permittees agree to adjust their Proportional
Cost allocations in accordance with the Cost Share Formulas in Exhibit "131"
( "Cost Share Formula for Preparation of the Plans ") and Exhibit "B2" ( "Cost
Share Formula for Implementation of the Plans "). The terminated Watershed
Permittee shall remain obligated to GWMA for its delinquent payments and
any other obligations incurred prior to the date of termination.
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
h) GWMA shall suspend all work being performed by any Consultants retained
by GWMA if any Watershed Permittee has not paid its invoice within forty
five (45) days after the GWMA first sent the invoice unless the City
Managers/ Administrators of the other Watershed Permittees inform the
GWMA in writing that their respective Watershed Permittees will pay the
delinquent Watershed Permittee's costs once the MOU with the delinquent
Watershed Permittee has been terminated.
i) Any delinquent payments by a Watershed Permittee shall accrue compound
interest at the then- current rate of interest in the Local Agency Investment
Fund, calculated from the first date of delinquency until the payment is made.
j) Funds remaining in the possession of the GWMA at the end of the term of this
MOU, or at the termination of this MOU, whichever occurs earlier, shall be
promptly returned to the then remaining Watershed Permittees in
accordance with the Cost Share Formulas in in Exhibit "B1" ( "Cost Share
Formula for Preparation of the Plans ") and Exhibit "B2" ( "Cost Share
Formula for Implementation of the Plans ").
8. Paragraph a) of Section 12 of the MOU entitled "Termination" is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"a) A Watershed Permittee may withdraw from this MOU for any reason, or no
reason, by giving the other Watershed Permittees thirty (30) days written notice thereof.
The effective withdrawal date shall be the thirtieth (30th) day after GWMA receives the
withdrawing Watershed Permittee's notice to withdraw from the MOU. The withdrawing
Watershed Permittee shall be responsible for its Proportional Costs and proportional MOU
Costs, which the GWMA incurred or to which it became bound through the effective date of
withdrawal. Such MOU Costs shall include the remaining fees of any Consultant retained by
the GWMA through the effective date of withdrawal. Should any Watershed Permittee
withdraw from the MOU, the remaining Watershed Permittees' Proportional Cost
allocation shall be adjusted in accordance with the Cost Share Formulas in Exhibit "B1"
( "Cost Share Formula for Preparation of the Plans ") and Exhibit "132" ( "Cost Share Formula
for Implementation of the Plans "). A withdrawing Watershed Permittee shall remain liable
for any loss, debt, liability otherwise incurred while participating in this MOU.
9. Exhibit "B" ( "Cost Sharing ") of the MOU shall be renamed "Exhibit `B1 "'( "Cost
Sharing Formula for Preparation of the Plans ").
10. A new Exhibit "B2" ( "Cost Sharing Formula for Implementation of the Plans ") is
hereby added to the MOU to read as set forth in Exhibit "B2" to this First Amendment,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
10. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the MOU shall remain in full force and effect.
6
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to
be executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: LOS ANGELES GATEWAY REGION INTEGRATED
REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT JOINT
POWERS AUTHORITY
Chris Cash
GWMA Chair
7
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to
be executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF DOWNEY
Mr. Gilbert A. Livas
City Manager
11111 Brookshire Avenue
Downey, CA 90241
Gilbert A. Livas
City Manager
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Adria M. Jimenez, CMC Yvette M. Abich Garcia
City Clerk City Attorney
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to
be executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF LAKEWOOD
Mr. Howard L. Chambers
City Manager
5050 Clark Avenue
Lakewood, CA 90712
Howard L. Chambers
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jo Mayberry Steve Skolnik
City Clerk City Attorney
9
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be
executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF LONG BEACH
Mr. Patrick H. West
City Manager
333 West Ocean Boulevard, 13th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Patrick H. West
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Poonam Davis Charles Parkin
City Clerk City Attorney
Un
12664/0004/1834593 -3
Deputy City Attorney
10
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be
executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF LYNWOOD
Mr. J. Arnoldo Beltran
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
J. Arnoldo Beltran
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Maria Quinonez David A. Garcia
City Clerk Legal Counsel
11
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be
executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF PICO RIVERA
Mr. Rene Bobadilla, P.E.
City Manager
6615 Passons Boulevard
Pico Rivera, CA 90660
Rene Bobadilla, P.E.
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Anna M. Jerome Arnold M. Alvarez - Glasman
City Clerk City Attorney
12
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be
executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF PARAMOUNT
Linda Benedetti -Leal
City Manager
16400 Paramount Blvd
Paramount, CA 90723
Linda Benedetti -Leal
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lana Chikami John E. Cavanaugh
City Clerk City Attorney
13
12664/0004/1834593 -3
LLAR MOU
05/14/2015
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be
executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Michael S. Flad
City Manager
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Michael S. Flad
City Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Carmen Avalos Raul F. Salinas
City Clerk City Attorney
14
12664/0004/1834593 -3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to
be executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: CITY OF SIGNAL HILL
Mr. Ken Farfsing
City Manager
2175 Cherry Avenue
Signal Hill, CA 90602
Ken Farfsing
City Manager
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Robert Copeland David J. Aleshire
City Clerk - Treasurer City Attorney
Page 15
12664/0004/1834593 -3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this FIRST
AMENDMENT to be executed on their behalf, respectively, as follows:
DATE: LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT
County of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works
Watershed Management Division, 11th Fl.
900 South Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803 -1331
Chief Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark J. Saladino
County Counsel
Deputy
Page 16
12664/0004/1834593 -3
EXHIBIT "132"
Cost Share Formula for Implementation of the Plans
The Watershed Permittees and the LACFCD agree to pay for the cost of
implementation of the WMP and CIMP, following this cost sharing allocation.
Cost Sharing Formula
beginning July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2020.
Page 17
12664/0004/1834593 -3
80% of cost
20% of cost
Agency
Agency
Agency
Agency
Area (sq
proportioned
Proportioned
cost per
cost per
cost per
mi)
based on
equally
$100,000
$500,000
$900,000
area
Downey
5.54
$9,630
$2,375
$12,005
$60,027
$108,048
Lakewood
0.08
$139
$2,375
$2,514
$12,570
$22,627
Long Beach
19.22
$33,411
$2,375
$35,786
$178,929
$322,072
Lynwood
4.84
$8,414
$2,375
$10,789
$53,943
$97,097
Paramount
3.12
$5,424
$2,375
$7,799
$38,993
$70,187
Pico Rivera
2.36
$4,102
$2,375
$6,477
$32,387
$58,297
Signal Hill
1.21
$2,103
$2,375
$4,478
$22,392
$40,305
South Gate
7.35
$12,777
$2,375
$15,152
$75,759
$136,366
Sub -Total
43.72
$76,000
$19,000
$95,000
$475,000
$855,000
LACFCD*
Contribute 5% of total
$5,000
$25,000
$45,000
NOTES:
• Other agencies may participate upon approval of cost sharing agreements by the LLAR Watershed
Committee and GWMA. Future participants shall be assessed a late entry cost as if they had been a
participant from the beginning of the Metals TMDL MOU, as of March 1, 2012, unless otherwise determined
by the LLAR Watershed Committee.
• Watershed Permittees and the cost share are subject to modifications due to, but not limited to, changes in
the number of participating agencies, refinements in mapping, and changes in boundaries.
'LACFC :s annual contribution shall not exceed $100 000 unless othen^:ise amended.
Page 17
12664/0004/1834593 -3
ATTACHMENT A
Water Boards
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
April 28, 2015
Permittees of the Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group'
APPROVAL, WITH CONDITIONS, OF THE LOWER LOS ANGELES RIVER GROUP'S
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (WMP), PURSUANT TO THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) PERMIT (NPDES
PERMIT NO. CAS004001; ORDER NO. R4- 2012 -0175) AND THE CITY OF LONG BEACH
MS4 PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT NO. CAS004003; ORDER NO. R4- 2014 -0024)
Dear Permittees of the Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group:
On November 8, 2012, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles
Region (Los Angeles Water Board or Board) adopted Order No. R4- 2012 -0175, Waste
Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharges within
the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except those Discharges Originating from the
City of Long Beach (hereafter, LA County MS4 Permit). On February 6, 2014, the Board
adopted Order No. R4- 2014 -0024, Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System Discharges from the City of Long Beach (hereafter, Long Beach MS4
Permit). Part VI.0 of the LA County MS4 Permit and Part VII.0 of the Long Beach MS4 Permit
allow Permittees the option to develop either a Watershed Management Program (WMP) or an
Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) to implement permit requirements on a
watershed scale through customized strategies, control measures, and best management
practices (BMPs).
Development of a WMP or EWMP is voluntary and allows a Permittee to address the highest
watershed priorities, including complying with the requirements of Part V.A (Receiving Water
Limitations), Part VI.E and Attachments L through R (Total Maximum Daily Load Provisions),
and by customizing the control measures in Parts III.A (Prohibitions — Non -Storm Water
Discharges) and VI.D (Minimum Control Measures), except the Planning and Land
I Permittees of the Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group include the Los Angeles County Flood
Control District; and the cities of Downey, Lakewood, Long Beach, Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill, and
South Gate. See attached distribution list.
mils!•,' S:.a_FP, CHAIR I SAVV(I UM-P11. tl /CIJbt . "[I
320 West dtn St Su-le 200. Ins AnOetes CA 90013 1 www.Walemaa:ds osangN?s
Lower Los Angeles River - 2 - April 28, 2015
Watershed Management Group
Development Program, of the LA County MS4 Permit.` Pursuant to Part VI.0 4 c of the LA
County MS4 Permit and Part VI I.C.4.c of the Long Beach MS4 Permit, the Permittees of the
Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group (LLAR WMG) jointly submitted a draft
WMP dated June 27, 2014, to the Los Angeles Water Board for review.
Public Review and Comment
On July 3, 2014, the Board provided public notice and a 46 -day period to allow for public review
and comment on the LLAR WMG's draft WMP. A separate notice of availability regarding the
draft WMPs, including the LLAR WMG draft WMP, was directed to State Senators and
Assembly Members within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County. The Board received
two comment letters that had comments on WMPs generally, which were in part applicable to
the LLAR WMG draft WMP. One joint letter was from Natural Resources Defense Council
(NRDC), Heal the Bay, and Los Angeles Waterkeeper, and the other letter was from the
Construction Industry Coalition on Water Quality (CICWQ). On October 9, 2014, the Board held
a workshop at its regularly scheduled Board meeting on the draft WMPs. The Board also held a
public meeting on April 13. 2015 for permittees and interested persons to discuss the revised
draft WMPs with the Executive Officer and staff. During its initial review and its review of the
revised draft WMP, the Los Angeles Water Board considered those comments applicable to the
LLAR WMG's proposed WMP.
Los Angeles Water Board Review
Concurrently with the public review, the Los Angeles Water Board, along with U.S. EPA Region
IX staff, reviewed the draft WMPs. On October 28, 2014, the Los Angeles Water Board sent a
letter to the LLAR WMG detailing the Board's comments on the draft WMP and identifying the
revisions that needed to be addressed prior to the Board's approval of the LLAR WMG's WMP.
The letter directed the LLAR WMG to submit a revised draft WMP addressing the Los Angeles
Water Board's comments. Prior to the LLAR WMG's submittal of the revised draft WMP, Board
staff had a meeting on January 23, 2015 with LLAR WMG representatives and consultants to
discuss the Board's comments and the revisions to the draft WMP, including the supporting
reasonable assurance analysis (RAA), which would address the Board's comments. The LLAR
WMG submitted a revised draft WMP on January 28, 2015 for Los Angeles Water Board review
and approval.
Approval of WMP, with Conditions
The Los Angeles Water Board hereby approves, subject to the following conditions, the LLAR
\A/MG's January 28, 2015 revised draft WMP. The Board may rescind this approval if all of the
2 Equivalent requirements in the Long Beach MS4 Permit are as follows: Part VI.A (Receiving Water Limitations), Part
VIII (Total Maximum Daily Load Provisions), Part IV.B (Prohibitions — Non -Storm Water Discharges), and Part VILD-
VII.M (Minimum Control Measures).
Lower Los Angeles River - 3 - April 28, 2015
Watershed Management Group
following conditions are not met to the satisfaction of the Board within the timeframe provided
below.
1. Revise the Load Reduction Strategy (LRS) schedule for Los Angeles River Estuary as
outlined in Table 3 -8 of the revised draft WMP as follows:
a. Revise "Submit LRS to Regional Board" deadline to April 28, 2017.
b. Revise 'Complete Implementation of LRS" deadline to October 28, 2021.
c. Revise deadlines for the achievement of interim or final dry- weather WQBELs to
October 28, 2024.
d. Revise dates included in the asterisked comment such that, if applicable, a
second phase LRS is submitted by October 28, 2025: second phase LRS
implementation is completed by April 28, 2029, and final WQBELs are achieved
by April 28, 2031.
2. Include the revised LRS schedule for Los Angeles River Estuary (Table 3 -8) in Chapter
5 of the revised draft WMP as part of the LLAR WMG's compliance schedule.
3. Correct Table 3 -2 of the revised draft WMP (pg. 3 -9) so that it shows that the City of
Paramount will implement the new fourth term nonstructural minimum control measures.
Additionally, revise any inapplicable control measures inadvertently listed for LACFCD.
4. Revise Section 5.2 of the revised draft WMP to include a table that lists definitive interim
and final milestone achievement dates and the responsible Permittee(s) for each LID
BMP in the Proposition 84 project. The responsible Permittees within the LLAR WMG
will be responsible for meeting these milestone achievement dates. Currently, the
revised WMP only provides "expected" dates for construction and completion.
5. Correct the units for the cadmium concentrations (i.e. 0.55 mg /L and 0.26 mg /L)
referenced in Section 2.2.5 of the revised draft WMP (pg. 2 -23).
6. Revise Table 5 -1 of the revised draft WMP to state that for control measures listed as
being a "jurisdictional effort," the Permittees that are responsible for completion of each
milestone are identified in Table 3 -11.
7. Revise Table 5 -1 of the revised draft WMP to include the milestones and milestone
completion dates for the following targeted control measures (TCMs) as follows:
a. TCM -PLD -2 (LID Ordinance): Remove the phrase "when practicable" and set a
milestone date for ordinance adoption to 12/28/17 (i.e., end of permit term).
b. TCM -TSS -1 (Exposed Soil Ordinance): Remove the phrase "if practicable" from
the milestone description.
c. TCM -TSS -3 (Private Lot Sweeping Ordinance): Remove the phrase "when
practicable" from the milestone description.
d. TCM -RET -1 (Encourage downspout disconnects): Identify interim milestone(s)
and dates) for milestone achievement and include in table.
8. Remove "Statewide Trash Amendments" from Table 5 -1 of the revised draft WMP, since
the amendments are inapplicable to the Los Angeles River Watershed given the existing
trash TMDL, and change the Chapter 3 ID for "Increased street sweeping frequency or
routes" to TCM- PAA -3.
Lower Los Angeles River - 4 - April 28, 2015
Watershed Management Group
9. In Section 4.3 of the revised draft WMP; include references to Table 3 -2, Table 3 -11,
and any other relevant tables that list BMPs contributing to the 10% pollutant reduction
assumption for non - modeled BMPs.
10. Provide further detail and specificity in Section 3.4.2.2 of the revised draft WMP on what
incentives are being included in TCM - NSWD -1 and whether any incentives are being
offered apart from Metropolitan Water District's rebate program.
11. The City of Long Beach submitted its Statement of Legal Authority to the Los Angeles
Water Board on February 26, 2015. Include this Statement of Legal Authority in the
WMP appendix section containing the other Permittees' legal authority statements.
The LLAR WMG shall submit a final WMP to the Los Angeles Water Board that satisfies all of
the above conditions no later than June 12, 2015.
Determination of Compliance with WMP
Pursuant to Part VI.C.6 of the LA County MS4 Permit and Part VII.C.6 of the Long Beach MS4
Permit, the Permittees of the LLAR WMG shall begin implementation of the approved WMP
immediately. To continue to be afforded the opportunity to implement permit provisions within
the framework of the WMP, Permittees must fully and timely implement all actions per
associated schedules set forth in the approved WMP regardless of any contingencies indicated
in the approved WMP (e.g., funding) unless a modification to the approved WMP, including any
extension of deadlines where allowed, is approved by the Los Angeles Water Board pursuant to
Part VI.C.6.a or Part VI.C.8.a.ii -iii of the LA County MS4 Permit, and/or Part VII.C.6 or Part
VII.C.8.b -c of the Long Beach MS4 Permit. The Los Angeles Water Board will determine the
LLAR Permittees' compliance with the WMP on the basis of the compliance actions and
milestones included in the WMP, including, but not limited to, the following:
• Pollutant Reduction Plan to Attain Interim & Final Limits (Section 5.4)
• Nonstructural Best Management Practices Schedule, including Table 5 -1 Nonstructural
TCM Compliance Schedule (Section 5.1)
• List of Nonstructural Targeted Control Measures, including Table 3 -11 Nonstructural
TCMs (Section 3.4.2)
• Proposition 84 Grant Award LID BMPs (Section 5.2)
• Structural Best Management Practice Schedule (Section 5.3)
• RAA Attachment B Detailed Jurisdictional Compliance Tables
Pursuant to Parts VI-C.3 and VI.E.2.d.i.(4)(a) of the LA County MS4 Permit', the LLAR
Permittees' full and timely compliance with all actions and dates for their achievement in their
approved WMP shall constitute compliance with permit provisions pertaining to applicable
WQBELs/WLAs in Part VI.E and Attachment O of the LA County MS4 Permit.4 Further, per Part
3 Corresponding provisions in the Long Beach MS4 Permit are Parts VII.C.3 and VIII.E.1.d.
4 Corresponding provisions in the Long Beach MS4 Permit are Part VIII (general TMDL provisions) and Parts VIII.K,
VIII.L, VIII.M, VIII.N, and VI11.0 (provisions specific to Los Angeles River Watershed TMDLs)
Lower Los Angeles River - 5 - April 28, 2015
Watershed Management Group
VI.C.2.b of the LA County MS4 Permit and Part VII.C.2.e of the Long Beach MS4 Permit, the
LLAR Permittees' full compliance with all requirements and dates for their achievement in their
approved WMP constitutes compliance with the receiving water limitations provisions of Part
V.A of the LA County MS4 Permit and Part VI.A of the Long Beach MS4 Permit for the specific
waterbody- pollutant combinations addressed by their approved WMP.
If the Permittees in the LLAR WMG fail to meet any requirement or date for its achievement in
the approved WMP, which will be demonstrated through the LLAR WMG's Annual Reports and
program audits (when conducted), the Permittees in the LLAR WMG shall be subject to the
baseline requirements of the LA County MS4 Permit and the Long Beach MS4 Permit, including
demonstrating compliance with applicable receiving water limitations and TMDL -based
WQBELsANLAs through outfall and receiving water monitoring. See Parts VI.C.2.c and
VI.E.2.d.i.(4)(c) of the LA County MS4 Permit, and Parts VII.C.2.f and VIII.E.1.d.iii of the Long
Beach MS4 Permit.
Annual Reporting
The LLAR WMG shall report on achievement of actions and milestones within the reporting
year, as well as progress towards future milestones related to multi -year projects, through their
Annual Report per Attachment E, Part XVIII of the LA County MS4 Permit and Attachment E,
Parts XV to XIX of the Long Beach MS4 Permit. For multi -year efforts, the LLAR WMG shall
include the status of the project, which includes the status with regard to standard project
implementation steps. These steps include, but are not limited to, adopted or potential future
changes to municipal ordinances to implement the project, site selection, environmental review
and permitting, project design, acquisition of grant or loan funding and /or municipal approval of
project funding, contractor selection, construction schedule, start-up, and effectiveness
evaluation (once operational), where applicable. For all stormwater retention /infiltration projects,
including LID due to new /redevelopment, green streets, and regional BMPs, the Permittees in
the LLAR WMG shall report annually on the volume of stormwater retained in the area covered
by the LLAR WMG WMP. The LLAR WMG shall also report annually on runoff reduction, total
suspended solids (TSS) reduction, and pollutant reductions from source control.
The LLAR WMG shall also include in their Annual Report the source(s) of funds used during the
reporting year, and those funds proposed for the coming year, to meet necessary expenditures
related to implementation of the actions identified in its WMP per Part VI.A.3 of the LA County
MS4 Permit and Part VII.A.3 of the Long Beach MS4 Permit. Further, as part of the annual
certification concerning a Permittee's legal authority required by Part VI.A.2.b of the LA County
MS4 Permit and Part VII.A.2.b of the Long Beach MS4 Permit, each Permittee in the LLAR
WMG shall also certify in the Annual Report that each has the necessary legal authority to
implement each of the actions and milestones in the approved WMP as required by Part
VI.C.5.b.iv.(6) of the LA County MS4 Permit and Part VILC.5 vi of the Long Beach MS4 Permit.
If a Permittee does not have legal authority to implement an action or milestone at the time the
Lower Los Angeles River - 6 - April 28, 2015
Watershed Management Group
LLAR WMG submits their Annual Report. the Permittee shall propose a schedule to establish
and maintain such legal authority.
Adaptive Management
The LLAR WMG shall conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its WMP no later than April 28,
2017, and subsequently, every two years thereafter pursuant to the adaptive management
process set forth in Part VI.C.8 of the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit and Part VII.C.8 of the
Long Beach MS4 Permit. As part of this process, the LLAR WMG must evaluate progress
toward achieving:
• Applicable WQBELsNVLAs in Attachment O of the LA County MS4 Permit and Parts
VIIIX, VIII.L, VIII.M, VIII.N, and VIII.O of the Long Beach MS4 Permit according to the
milestones set forth in its WMP;
• Improved water quality in MS4 discharges and receiving waters;
• Stormwater retention milestones; and
• Multi -year efforts that were not completed in the current year and will continue into the
subsequent year(s), among other requirements.
The LLAR WMG's evaluation of the above shall be based on both progress implementing
actions in the WMP and an evaluation of outfall -based monitoring data and receiving water data.
Per Attachment E, Part XVIII.6 of the LA County MS4 Permit and Attachment E, Part XVIII.6 of
the Long Beach MS4 Permit, the LLAR WMG shall implement adaptive management strategies,
including but not limited to:
• Refinement and recalibration of the Reasonable Assurance Analysis (RAA) based on
data specific to the LLAR WMP area that are collected through the LLAR WMG's
Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and other data as appropriate;
• Identifying the most effective control measures, why they are the most effective, and
how other control measures can be optimized based on this understanding;
• Identify the least effective control measures, why they are ineffective, and how the
control measures can be modified or replaced to be more effective;
• Identify significant changes to control measures during the prior year(s) and the
rationale for the changes; and
• Describe all significant changes to control measures anticipated to be made in the next
year(s) and the rationale for each change.
As part of the adaptive management process, any modifications to the WMP, including any
requests for extension of deadlines not associated with TMDL provisions, must be submitted to
the Los Angeles Water Board for review and approval. The Permittees of the LLAR WMG must
implement any modifications to the WMP upon approval by the Los Angeles Water Board or its
Executive Officer, or within 60 days of submittal of modification if the Los Angeles Water Board
or its Executive Officer expresses no objections. Note that the LA County MS4 Permittees'
Report(s) of Waste Discharge (ROWD) are due no later than July 1, 2017 and the City of Long
Beach's ROWD is due no later than September 29, 2018. To align any modifications to the
Lower Los Angeles River - 7 - April 28, 2015
Watershed Management Group
WMP proposed through the adaptive management process with permit reissuance, results of
the first adaptive management cycle should be submitted in conjunction with the Permittees'
ROWD.
The Los Angeles Water Board appreciates the participation and cooperation of the LLAR WMG
in the implementation of the LA County MS4 Permit. If you have any questions, please contact
Chris Lopez at Chris. LopezQwaterboards.ca.gov or by phone at (213) 576 -6674. Alternatively,
you may also contact Ivar Ridgeway, Storm Water Permitting, at
Ivar .Ridgeway�E�waterboards.ca.gov or by phone at (213) 620 -2150.
Sincerely,
Samuel Unger, P.E.
Executive Officer
Enclosure: Mailing Distribution List
Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group
Mailing Distribution List (via email)
Jason Wen
City of Downey
jwen(a�)downeyca.org
Konya Vivanti
City of Lakewood
kvivanti(d,)lakewood city, org
Anthony Arevalo
City of Long Beach
Anthony Arevalo@longbeach.gov
Emilio Murga
City of Lynwood
emurga(a)lvnwood.ca.us
Sarah Ho
City of Paramount
shoo(c paramountcity.com
Gladis Deras
City of Pico Rivera
gderas(a)pi co- rive ra. org
Steve Myrter
City of Signal Hill
smyrter(a�cityofsignalhill.or
Arturo Cervantes
City of South Gate
acervantesa- soaate. ora
Keith Jones
Caltrans
ktones(a�dot.ca.gov
Terri Grant
Los Angeles County Flood Control District
tgrant(@dpw.lacounty.gov
MS4 Discharges within the
Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County
ATTACHMENT B
ORDER NO. R4- 2012 -0175
NPDES NO. CAS004001
ii. When the receiving water body is a river, stream or creek, dry weather
shall be defined as when the flow is less than 20 percent greater than
the base flow or as defined by effective TMDLs within the watershed,
or an alternative criterion as provided for in an approved IMP or CIMP.
c. At a minimum the following parameters shall be monitored during dry
weather conditions, unless a surrogate pollutant has been approved by
the Executive Officer of the Regional Water Board:
i. Flow
ii. Pollutants assigned receiving water limitations derived from TMDL dry
weather WI-As,
iii. Other pollutants identified on the CWA section 303(d) List for the
receiving water or downstream receiving waters,
iv. TSS and hardness, when metals are monitored,
v. Field measurements for monitoring of inland freshwater bodies:
dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and specific conductivity,
vi. Aquatic Toxicity (once per year, during the month with the historically
lowest flows).
d. Additionally, the parameters in Table E -2 shall be monitored in the first
year of monitoring during the critical dry weather event. If a parameter is
not detected at the Method Detection Limit (MDL) for its respective test
method or the result is below the lowest applicable water quality objective,
and is not otherwise identified in subparts c.i.- c.iii. or c.v.- c.vii. above, it
need not be further analyzed. If a parameter is detected exceeding the
lowest applicable water quality objective then the parameter shall be
analyzed for the remainder of the Order during dry weather at the
receiving water monitoring station where it was detected.
Table E -2. Storm Water Monitoring Program's Constituents with
Associated Minimum Levels (MLs)3
CONSTITUENTS,-
MLS
CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS
m /L
Oil and Grease
5
Total Phenols
0.1
Cyanide
0.005
H
0 -14
Temperature
N/A
Dissolved Oxygen
Sensitivity to 5 m /L
BACTERIA (single sample limits
MPN /100mi
Total coliform marine waters
10,000
3 For priority pollutants, MLs published in Appendix 4 of the Policy for Implementation of Toxics Standards for Inland
Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California (SIP) shall be used for all analyses, unless otherwise
specified. Method Detection Levels (MDLs) must be lower than or equal to the ML value, unless otherwise
approved by the Regional Board.
Attachment E — Reporting Program No. CI -6948 E -17
Angeles County
ORDER NO. R4- 2012 -0175
NPDES NO. CAS004001
CONSTITUENTS
MLs
Enterococcus marine waters
104
Fecal coliform marine & fresh waters
400
E. coli fresh waters
235
GENERAL
m /L
Dissolved Phosphorus
0.05
Total Phosphorus
0.05
Turbidity
0.1 NTU
Total Suspended Solids
2
Total Dissolved Solids
2
Volatile Suspended Solids
2
Total Or anic Carbon
1
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
5
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
2
Chemical Oxygen Demand
20 -900
Total Ammonia-Nitrogen
0.1
Total Keldahl Nitrogen
0.1
Nitrate - Nitrite
0.1
Alkalinity
2
Specific Conductance
1 umho /cm
Total Hardness
2
MBAS
0.5
Chloride
2
Fluoride
0.1
Methyl tertiary butyl ether MTBE
1
Perchlorate
4 /L
METALS Dissolved & Total
/L
Aluminum
100
Antimony
0.5
Arsenic
1
Beryllium
0.5
Cadmium
0.25
Chromium total
0.5
Chromium Hexavalent
5
Copper
0.5
Iron
100
Lead
0.5
Mercury
0.5
Nickel
1
Selenium
1
Silver
0.25
Thallium
1
Zinc
1
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACIDS
/L
2- Chloro henol
2
4- Chloro -3 -meth I henol
1
2,4- Dichloro henol
1
2,4- Dimeth I henol
2
2,4- Dinitro henol
5
2-Nitro phenol
10
ACIDS
/L
4-Nitro phenol
5
Attachment E — Reporting Program No. CI -6948
E -18
MS4 Discharges within the
Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County
ORDER NO. R4- 2012 -0175
NPDES NO. CAS004001
CON STITUENTS3g
Pentachloro henol
2
Phenol
1
2,4,6- Trichloro henol
10
BASE /NEUTRAL
/L
Acena hthene
1
Acena hth lene
2
Anthracene
2
Benzidine
5
1,2 Benzanthracene
5
Benzo a rene
2
Benzo ,h,i er lene
5
3,4 Benzoflou rant hene
10
Benzo k flouranthene
2
Bis 2- Chloroethox methane
5
Bis 2- Chloroiso ro I ether
2
Bis 2- Chloroeth I ether
1
Bis 2 - Ethyl hexl phthalate
5
4 -Bromo hen I phenyl ether
5
Butyl benz I phthalate
10
2- Chloroeth I vinyl ether
1
2- Chlorona hthalene
10
4- Chloro hen I phenyl ether
5
Chr sene
5
Dibenzo a,h anthracene
0.1
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
1
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
1
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
1
3,3- Dichlorobenzidine
5
Diethyl phthalate
2
Dimeth I phthalate
2
di -n -But I phthalate
10
2,4- Dinitrotoluene
5
2,6- Dinitrotoluene
5
4,6 Din itro -2 -methyl phenol
5
1,2 -Di hen Ih drazine
1
di -n -Oct I phthalate
10
Fluoranthene
0.05
Fluorene
0.1
Hexachlorobenzene
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
1
Hexachloro -c clo entadiene
5
Hexachloroethane
1
Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene
0.05
Iso horone
1
Naphthalene
0.2
Nitrobenzene
1
N- Nitroso- dimeth I amine
5
N- Nitroso -di hen I amine
1
N-Nitroso-di-n-propyl amine
5
Phenanthrene
0.05
BASE /NEUTRAL
/L
P rene
0.05
Attachment E — Reporting Program No. CI -6948 E -19
MS4 Discharges within the
Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County
ORDER NO. R4- 2012 -0175
NPDES NO. CAS004001
1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene
1
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES
/L
Aldrin
0.005
al ha -BHC
0.01
beta -BHC
0.005
delta -BHC
0.005
gamma-BHC lindane
0.02
alpha-chlordane
0.1
gamma-chlordane
0.1
4,4' -DDD
0.05
4,4' -DDE
0.05
4,4' -DDT
0.01
Dieldrin
0.01
al ha- Endosulfan
0.02
beta - Endosulfan
0.01
Endosulfan sulfate
0.05
Endrin
0.01
Endrin aldehyde
0.01
Heptachlor
0.01
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.01
Toxa hene
0.5
POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
/L
Aroclor -1016
0.5
Aroclor -1221
0.5
Aroclor -1232
0.5
Aroclor -1242
0.5
Aroclor -1248
0.5
Aroclor -1254
0.5
Aroclor -1260
0.5
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES
/L
Atrazine
2
Chlorpyrifos
0.05
C anazine
2
Diazinon
0.01
Malathion
1
Prometr n
2
Simazine
2
HERBICIDES
/L
2,4 -D
10
Glyphosate
5
2,4,5- TP- SILVEX
0.5
VII. OUTFALL BASED MONITORING
A. Storm Drains, Channels and Outfalls Map(s) and /or Database. The IMP
and /or CIMP plan(s) shall include a map(s) and /or database of the MS4 to
include the following information:
1. Surface water bodies within the Permittee(s) jurisdiction
2. Sub - watershed (HUC 12) boundaries
Attachment E — Reporting Program No. CI -6948 E -20