HomeMy Public PortalAbout90-924 ORDINANCE NO. 90-924
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARSON ADOPTING
THE DOMINGUEZ TECHNOLOGY CENTRE SPECIFIC PLAN
(SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2-89) WITH AMENDMENTS AND
CONDITIONS THERETO, AND CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THEREFOR
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON HEREBY ORDAINS
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by the
applicant, Dominguez Properties, with respect to real property
described in Exhibit "A, " attached hereto, requesting the
approval of the Dominguez Technology Centre Specific Plan (Spe-
cific Plan No. 2-89) , pursuant to California Government Code
Sections 65450 through 65457, for the development of a 288-acre
parcel for an industrial, technological and office complex to be
known as the Dominguez Technology Centre.
Section 2 . The property is zoned ML (Manufacturing,
Light) ; ML-D (Manufacturing, Light-Design Overlay District) ; and
CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) . The Project is bordered to the
north and east by industrially zoned property; to the south by RS
(Residential, Single-Family) zoned property. Specific Plan
No. 2-89 will allow for the construction of up to 4 .7 million
square feet of technological, office, commercial' and industrial
buildings. Upon completion of the 4 .7 million square feet, an
additional 10% of gross floor area may be constructed if:
(1) a traffic study is completed and demonstrates that all on
and off-site intersections and freeway on and off-ramps
identified in the Specific Plan are operating at the standards
set by the Public Works Committee and identified in the
Implementation section of the Specific Plan text, and (2) there
is not a significant environmental impact on air quality, traffic
circulation, noise, public services or other areas as determined
by the City Council and identified in the Development Plan
Section of the Specific Plan Text.
Section 3 . An Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was
prepared for the Project by PBR, an environmental consultant.
The EIR was circulated to interested agencies. Comments were
received and responses prepared and incorporated into the
Specific Plan/EIR text. A copy of the EIR is on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
Section 4 . The Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the Specific Plan and EIR on December 12, 1989,
January 9, 1990 and February 13, 1990 at 7: 00 p.m. at City Hall,
Council Chambers, 701 East Carson Street, Carson, California.
Notices of the time, place and purpose of the aforesaid meetings
were duly provided in accordance with California Government Code
Sections 65355 and 65090.
Section 5. Evidence, both written and oral, was duly
presented to and considered by the Planning Commission at the
aforesaid public hearings, including but not limited to staff
reports dated December 12th, Ja° a-' "`h and February 13th, along
with testimony by the applicant and other members of the public.
Section 6. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. 90-1301, recommending that the City Council adopt and certify
the EIR, with certain amendments thereto as contained in Exhib-
it "C, " attached to that Resolution, and recommending approval of
Specific Plan No. 2-89, subject to amendments and conditions
listed in Exhibit "D, " attached to that Resolution.
901108 lem 1680295 (7)
Ord. 90-924 Page 2 of 11
Section 7. The City Council conducted a public hearing
on the Specific Plan and EIR on September 4, 1990 and September
18, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 701 East
Carson Street, Carson, California. A notice of the time, place
and purpose of the aforesaid meetings were duly provided in
accordance with California Government Code Sections 65355 and
65090.
Section 8. Evidence, both written and oral, was duly
presented to and considered by the City Council at the aforesaid
public hearings, including but not limited to staff reports dated
September 4, 1990 and September 18, 1990, along with testimony by
the applicant and other members of the public.
Section 9. The City Council hereby certifies that the
Final EIR has been completed, that the Final EIR was presented to
and reviewed by the City Council and that the City Council con-
sidered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to
approving the Dominguez Technology Centre Specific Plan (Specific
Plan No. 2-89) .
Section 10. With respect to the potential significant
environmental effects identified in the Final EIR, the City
Council finds as follows:
A. Land Use. The Final EIR identifies as a
potential significant environmental effect the land use
compatibility conflicts between the proposed industrial/office
uses and the residential uses south of University Drive and the
University west of the subject property. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
reduce the environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A
100 foot set-back from University Drive and a 25-foot setback
from proposed Central Avenue will be required for all development
on the site. The industrial and commercial areas are to be
developed in a manner architecturally harmonious and compatible
with the adjacent residential and University uses. . Vehicular
access to the site from University Drive either through roads or
by driveways shall not be permitted thereby reducing the
vehicular impact of the development on the adjacent residential
area. Vehicular access to the site from proposed Central Avenue
either through roads or by driveways shall be permitted only
through State of California subdivision processing standards as
described in the California Government Code, Division 2 of Title
7. These mitigation measures are detailed in the Specific Plan
text in the section entitled Site Development Standards.
B. Land Use. The Final EIR identifies as a
potential significant environmental effect the change in the
existing on-site use from agricultural and oil-related facilities
to industrial, office and retail uses. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
reduce the environmental impacts to a level of insignificance.
The Implementation section of the Specific Plan text will provide
the mitigation measures necessary to lessen any adverse
environmental effects involving agricultural and oil related land
uses as they are removed or abandoned.
C. Geology. The Final EIR identifies as a
potsn*4.=1 �i.gnificant environmental effect the ground shaking,
ground subsidence, ground rupture and liquefaction that may occur
because the Project is located within a fault zone. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project and mitigation measures are specified in the EIR section
of the Specific Plan text which reduce the environmental impacts
to a level of insignificance. A certified geologist's report
will be required for the development and its findings
incorporated into a grading plan for the site. (EIR - Mitigation
Measures) . A structural engineer, experienced with earthquake
resistent design shall approve all building plans to determine
901108 lem 1680295 (7) —2—
Ord. 90-924 Page 3 of 11
the adequacy of the structural design of the development.
(EIR - Mitigation Measures) . All buildings shall be required to
comply with structural and seismic safety standards contained in
applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Building Code, as
amended and adopted by the City of Carson. (EIR - Mitigation
Measures) .
D. Hydrology. The Final EIR identifies as a
potential significant environmental effect the conversion of
existing uses to urban uses which will thereby increase the
amount of impervious surfaces and reduce rainfall infiltration
and generate 513 cubic feet of runoff per second based on a 50-
year design storm event. The Final EIR also identifies as a
potential significant environmental effect the further
disruption of a U.S.G.S. "blue-line" stream. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the
project and mitigation measures have been specified in the EIR
section of the Specific Plan text which reduce the environmental
impacts to a level of insignificance. All required drainage
improvements are to be designed and constructed in accordance
with the City and Los Angeles County Flood Control District
standards and shall be reviewed and approved by both the City of
Carson and Los Angeles County Flood Control District. All
tentative parcel maps, and site plans within the specific plan
area are to be accompanied by adequate plans for drainage
improvements prepared by a registered professional engineer. The
City Engineer is to review and approve an erosion, siltation and
dust control plan prior to the issuance of grading permits to
minimize soil transport off-site and to minimize air quality
impacts. All storm drains, grading, water and sewer service
shall be mitigated and conform to the standards conceptually
shown in the Infrastructure and Implementation sections of the
Specific Plan text. The project applicant shall obtain a permit
for alteration of local stream beds from the California
Department of Fish and Game prior to the issuance of a grading
permit for the on-site drainage area in Reyes Ravine.
E. Biology. The Final EIR identifies as a
potential significant environmental effect the removal of
existing vegetation resulting from grading of the site.
Biotic/Habitat surveys completed on August 6, 1989, revealed no
significant adverse impacts to native flora and fauna will result
from project implementation. The complete biological assessment
is included as Appendix 1 of the Specific Plan. No additional
mitigation measures are proposed other than the applicant
obtaining a permit from the California Department of Fish and
Game.
F. Air Ouality - Short-term Impacts. The Final
EIR identifies as a potential significant environmental effect
significant short-term fugitive dust impacts due to earthwork
activity during construction. Mitigation measures have been
specified in the EIR which will reduce the environmental impacts
to a level of insignificance. The project will mitigate this
potential adverse impact by providing efficient construction
scheduling and periodic watering of the construction site to
reduce construction related exhaust emissions and fugitive dust
emissions.
G. Air Ouality - Long-term Imr-7` The Final
EIR identifies as a potential significant environmental effect an
increase in localized emissions due to increased traffic volumes
created by the project. Mitigation Measures have been specified
in the EIR which will reduce the environmental impacts to a level
of insignificance. The project will mitigate this potential
adverse impact by complying with Southern California Air Quality
Management District rules and regulations for industrial,
technology, and office uses. The Community Development Director
shall approve Air Quality Management Plan recommendations which
901108 tern 1680295 (7) —3—
Ord. 90-924 Page 4 of 11
are incorporated into the project and identified in the
Implementation section of the Specific Plan text.
H. Traffic/Circulation. The Final EIR
identifies as a potential significant environmental effect an
increase of 43,700 vehicle trips per day generated by the
Project. This project, combined with cumulative projects, is
anticipated to affect ten (10) on and off-site intersections and
eight (8) on and off-ramps of the SR-91 (Artesia Freeway) .
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project to reduce environmental impacts to a level of
insignificance. Mitigation measures include, but are not limited
to, street widening, signalization, restriping, raised landscape
medians, access to the project site, parking, and a
Transportation Demand Management Program. On and off-site
traffic and circulation mitigation measures are identified in the
EIR and Implementation sections of the Specific Plan text.
The following off-site mitigation measures are
governed by this Section H:
Surface Street Intersections.
1. Central Avenue & Artesia Street (Westbound)
2. Central Avenue & Albertoni Street (Eastbound)
3. Wilmington Avenue & Artesia Street (Westbound)
4. Wilmington Avenue & Albertoni Street (Eastbound)
5. Wilmington Avenue & Del Amo Boulevard
6. University Drive & Avalon Boulevard
7 . Westside of Central Avenue between University
Drive and Victoria Street
Freeway Ramn Connections.
1. Westbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp to Wilmington Avenue
2 . Westbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp from Wilmington
Avenue
3 . Westbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp to Central Avenue
4. Westbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp form Central Avenue
5. Eastbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp to Wilmington Avenue
6. Eastbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp from Wilmington
Avenue
7. Eastbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp to Central Avenue
8. Eastbound 91 Freeway Off Ramp from Central Avenue
Freeway Overcrossing (Bridge Surfaces) .
1. Central Avenue & 91 Freeway
2. Wilmington Avenue & 91 Freeway
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, the
City finds that some of the transportation improvements specified
in this Section which are required to mitigate or avoid the
significant environmental effects of the project require approval
of plans for such improvements by the State of California, the
County of Los Angeles or the City of Compton. Some of the
improvements also may require these agencies to exercise their
power of eminent domain to acquire the property on which the
improvements are to be located. Approval of the measures can
arm ^h^»ia be adopted by these other agencies, but without their
approval, some of the measures cannot be implemented as and when
required. Pursuant to Condition 128 of the Specific Plan,
Developer shall construct, bond for or remain obligated to
complete all such improvements specified herein. In the event
the agency or agencies having jurisdiction over the property on
which the improvement is to be located fail to approve the
improvement and/or fail to obtain possession of the property for
such improvement within the time period specified therein
(hereinafter, the "Delayed Improvement") , then Developer shall
not be required to complete the Delayed Improvement within the
901108 (em 1680295 (7) —4—
Ord. 90-924 Page 5 of 11
time period otherwise specified in the Specific Plan, but
Developer shall instead be obligated to complete the Delayed
Improvement as soon as reasonably practicable and in accordance
with the City's guidelines for such construction, as provided in
a timetable agreed upon by and between the Developer and the
Director of Public Works.
I. Noise. The Final EIR identifies as a poten-
tial significant environmental effect the potential short-term
acoustical impacts caused during project construction on adjacent
land uses. The project will mitigate this potential adverse
impact to a level of insignificance by limiting hours of con-
struction, the utilization of State measures for muffling and
shielding intake and exhaust from equipment and vehicles from
adjacent land uses, and compliance with City regulations, regula-
tions contained in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations
and the Uniform Building Code. The mitigation measures are
identified in the EIR and Implementation sections of the Specific
Plan text.
J. Employment/Housing. The Final EIR identifies
as a potential significant environmental effect an increase of
13, 836 persons in the City's daytime population. The increase in
employment opportunities is viewed by the City as a potential
beneficial impact. No mitigation measures are required. Using
the 1989 California State Employment Development Department
figure the current dwelling unit count estimated in the Carson
Housing Element, a jobs/housing ratio of 1.73 is considered
representative of current City conditions. According to the City
of Los Angeles ' jobs/housing proposed guidelines, a jobs/housing
ratio between 1. 10 and 1.74 is considered relatively balanced.
The 1.73 figure for Carson lies within the balanced category of
the guidelines. The EIR section of the Specific Plan text
identifies the impact and the resulting analysis.
K. Aesthetics. The Final EIR identifies as a
potential significant environmental effect an alteration in the
visual character of the site from existing nursery and oil-
related uses to urbanized industrial/office uses with implementa-
tion of the Project. Changes or alterations have been required
in, or incorporated into the Project which reduce the environ-
mental impacts to a level of insignificance. The visual change
may be apparent to the residents along the southern edge of the
Project as well as to the University student housing along the
western edge of the project. Landscaping and architectural
standards equal to or exceeding Zoning ordinance provisions will
be applied to the project to mitigate any adverse aesthetic
environmental effects.
L. Cultural Resources. The Final EIR identifies
as a potential significant environmental effect the potential
disturbance or destruction of significant archaeological or
historical material on-site. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into the Project which reduce the
environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A qualified
archaeologist and paleontologist shall be retained to assess the
significance of any findings. Appropriate mitigation measures
specific to each findings will be utilized to mitigate any
adverse environmental effects involving cultural resources.
M. Public Services. The Final EIR identifies as
a potential significant environmental effect an increased demand
on services and utilities. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into the Project which reduce the
environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. Mitigation
measures identified in the Implementation section of the Specific
Plan text will comply with existing requirements and provide
consideration and implementation of yet unidentified future need.
Those requirements provide that all water and fire service supply
shall meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Health
901108 lem 1680295 (7) —5—
Ord. 90-924 Page 6 of 11
Department and Fire Department and be constructed to standards
contained in the Water Concept Plan shown on Exhibit 15 of the
Specific Plan. All sewer main and trunk lines are required to
meet the standards of the Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works and Los Angeles County Sanitation District and permitted
uses in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the availability of
sewer service capacity for those uses.
Section 11. With respect to the Dominguez Technology
Centre Specific Plan, the City Council finds:
A. Specific Plan No. 2-89, which is on file in
the office of the City Clerk and is hereby incorporated herein by
reference, will comply with the requirements of California
Government Code Section 65451 in that, as revised to incorporate
the conditions contained in a document on file in the City
Clerk's office entitled "Conditions of Approval of Specific Plan
2-89, " which document is incorporated herein by reference, the
Specific Plan does specify in detail:
1. The distribution, location and extent of
the uses of land, including open space within the area covered by
the Plan;
2. The proposed distribution, location,
extent and intensity of major components of public and private
transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal,
energy and other essential facilities proposed to be located
within the area covered by the Plan and needed to support the
land uses as described in the Plan;
3. Standards and criteria by which develop-
ment will proceed and standards for the conservation, development
and utilization of natural resources;
4. A program of implementation measures
including regulations, programs, public works projects and
financing measures necessary to carry out the Specific Plan; and
5. A statement of the relationship of the
Specific Plan to the General Plan.
B. Specific Plan No. 2-89, as amended by the
conditions imposed permits uses and types of development that are
consistent with the General Plan, which designates the property
for manufacturing and commercial uses.
C. The site is adequate in size, shape,
topography and location so as to accommodate the proposed uses.
The property consists of 288 acres and is presently occupied by
active and abandoned oil wells and commercial flower growers.
D. There will be adequate street access and
traffic capacity for the proposed uses and development. The
subject property will be served by Wilmington Avenue, a fully-
dedicated and partially improved major highway 100 feet in width;
University Drive, a fully-dedicated and partially improved
secondary highway 80 feet in width; Central Avenue, presently
undedicated and unimproved major highway, which will become a 100
foot dedicated and ?_m^rc-c?a major highway by conditions incorpo-
rated herein; and Victoria Street, a fully-dedicated and
partially improved major highway 100 feet in width.
E. The Specific Plan will contain the develop-
ment standards required by the Zoning Ordinance for the provision
of streetlights, undergrounding of all new utilities and similar
infrastructure, and for maintenance of all structures, grounds,
parking facilities, landscaping and hardscape in a neat and
orderly manner at all times.
901108 lean 1680295 (7) —6—
Ord. 90-924 Page 7 of 11
F. The Specific Plan contains provisions requir-
ing the project and the individual structures thereto to undergo
Site Plan and Design Review to assure appropriate placement and
architectural compatibility between adjacent uses.
Section 12. Based upon the aforementioned findings,
the City Council hereby adopts Specific Plan No. 2-89 for the
property described in Exhibit "A, " subject to the amendments and
conditions listed in Exhibit "B, " which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Section 13 . The City Clerk shall certify to the adop-
tion of this Ordinance and shall transmit copies of the same to
the applicant.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7n1h day of LJ,nver,her ,
1990.
hw/w
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
r
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
"Or<2�9 X�rtt�
CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss .
CITY OF CARSON )
I, Helen S. Kawagoe, City Clerk of the City of Carson, California, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is
five; that the foregoing ordinance, being Ordinance No. 90-924 passed first reading on
October 29, 1990, was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of said City at a
regular meeting of said Council , duly and regularly held on the 20th day of November,
1990, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mi.toma, Calas, and DeWitt
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Muise
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: McDonald
417011L. L_
City Clerk, City of Carson, C lifornia
901108 lee 1680295 (7) —7—
EXHIBIT*A" ORD. 90-924 Page R of 11
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE 611.05 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN RANCHO SAN PEDRO,
IN THE CITY OF CARSON, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ALLOTTED TO MARIA DE LOS REYES DOMINGUEZ, BY DECREE
OF PARTITION OF A PORTION OF THE SAID RANCHO, ENTERED IN CASE NO.
3284, SUPERIOR COURT OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ALLOTMENT
WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 19.43 ACRE HOMESTEAD TRACT, ALLOTTED
TO VICTORIA DOMINGUEZ DE CARSON, BY SAID DECREE OF PARTITION WITH
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF VICTORIA STREET. THENCE ALONG SAID LINE WOUTH
88" WEST 114.39 CHAINS TO A POST IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
HIGHLAND TRACT OF 500.00 ACRES OF VICTORIA D. DE CARSON, THENCE
ALONG THE SAME SOUTH 50.18 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 3.14 CHAINS ALONG THE HIGHLAND TRACT OF GUADALUPE
DOMINGUEZ TO A POST; THENCE ALONG THE SAME NORTH 88' EAST TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN A LEASE TO THE HOLLY
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, RECORDED DECEMBER S, 1923, IN BOOK 3013 PAGE
1, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LEASED
LAND, NORTH 08" 30' EAST 1779.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LEASED LAND, NORTH
880 EAST 1224.22 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE 200.00 ACRE TRACT
KNOWN AS THE "HOMESTEAD OF GUADALUPE, SUSANNA AND REYES
DOMINGUEZ", AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED BY THE COMMISSIONERS IN
PARTITION IN SAID CASE NO. 3204; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE
NORTH 08-1/5" EAST TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 19.43 ACRE TRACT
HEREINBEFORE REFERRED TO; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
19.43 ACRE TRACT, NORTH 8-1/4" EAST 3AS CHAINS TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
A. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND:
COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID 611.OS ACRE
TRACT, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH
87" 58' S1" EAST 2370.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE, AS SAID CENTERLINE
IS SHOWN ON COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MAP NO. 8588 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 04. 03' 09' WEST
40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE
NORTH 02. 01' 09" WEST 600.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49" 49' 44" WEST 175.46
FEET; THENCE NORTH 02. 01' 09" WEST 480.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87" Sr
S1" EAST 274.S3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49" 49' 44" EAST 42.04 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 310.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40. 16' 16" AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 217.89 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89" S4' 00" EAST 954.S3 FEET; THENCE NORTH
87" Sr 27" EAST 180.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89" S4' 00" EAST 177.91 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 27.00 FEET, SAID CURVE BEING TANGENT AT ITS
NORTHERLY TERMINUS WITH A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 17.00
FEET WESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE EASTERLY LINE
OF PARCEL S, AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK S3, PAGES 37 AND 38 OF
RECORD OF SURVEY, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90" Sr 09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 44.27 FEET TO SAID
3 NORTHERLY TERMINUS; THENCE NORTH 8S" S6' Si" EAST 17.00 FEET TO SAID
ar
F EASTERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 04' 03' 09'
EAST 820.76 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID LINE WHICH IS NORTH 04. 03' 09' WEST
300.00 FEET FROM THE SAID -SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID 611.05 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE SOUTH 85" 56' $1" WEST 17.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04' 03' 09' EAST
242.37 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 04" 03' 09" WEST 17.00 FEET FROM
A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED
AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, THENCE SOUTH 41• ST
S6" WEST 23.61 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE,
SAID POINT BEING DISTANT ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 87" Sr S1'
WEST 17.00 FEET FROM SAID LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 17.00 FEET
WESTERLY OF SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL S; THENCE ALONG
AFOREMENTIONED PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 87" Sr 51" WEST 1734.60 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION
B. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE
WESTERLY LINE OF.WILMINGTON ROAD. OR WILMINGTON AVENUE.
C. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE 611.OS ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN RANCHO
SAN PEDRO, IN THE CITY OF CARSON, IN THE COUNTY OF.LOS ANGELES,
STATE- OF CALIFORNIA, ALLOTTED TO MARIA DE LOS REYES DOMINGUEZ
BY DECREE OF PARTITION OF A PORTION OF THE SAID RANCHO, ENTERED
IN CASE NO. 3284, SUPERIOR COURT OF SAID COUNTY, BOUNDED ON THE
WEST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 611.05 ACRE TRACT, ON THE EAST
BY THE CENTERLINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE, AS SAID CENTERLINE.IS SHOWN
ON COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MAP NO. 8588, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; ON THE
♦ SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 439.73 FEET NORTHERLY
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID 611.OS
ACRE TRACT, AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE EASTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF
LAND GRANTED TO DOMINGUEZ ESTATE COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED
IN BOOK 0-879, PAGE 987, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
EXHIBIT A
Ord. 90-924 Page 9 of 11
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESOLVED AT THE COUNCIL MEETING
ON OCTOBER 290 1990
FOR THE DOMINGUEZ TECHNOLOGY CENTRE
SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2-89)
42 . Location of Central Avenue. The Developer shall
construct full width street improvements (including curb,
gutter, lighting, street trees and sidewalks) along Central
Avenue (100 feet) from Victoria Avenue to University Drive.
The Developer shall construct a Class-1 bicycle path on the
west side of Central Avenue from Victoria Avenue to
University Drive. If California State University Dominguez
Hills (CSUDH) grants an easement for a portion of Central
Avenue to be located on its property, including the Class-1
bicycle path and sidewalk, then the City will use its best
efforts to assist Developer in securing funds and grants
from CSUDH and the county, state and federal governments to
construct that portion of the improvements which will be on
CSUDH property. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding
sentence, nothing contained herein shall be construed to
require the City to provide other funds or grants to assist
Developer in the construction of the Central Avenue
improvements specified in this condition. Central Avenue,
including the adjacent sidewalks and bike path on the west
side shall be constructed between University Drive and Glenn
Curtiss prior to occupancy of Phase I of the project.
Central Avenue, including the adjacent sidewalks and bike
path on the west side of Central Avenue, shall be con-
structed between Glenn Curtiss and Victoria Avenue prior to
occupancy of Phase II of the project.
80. Exterior Perimeter Streets. The Developer shall
construct full width street improvements (including but not
limited to curb, gutter, lighting, street trees and side-
walks) along exterior streets: Victoria Street (100 feet) ,
Wilmington Avenue (100 feet) , University Drive (84 feet,
until such time that the General Plan is amended to provide
for an 80 foot width) and Central Avenue (100 feet) . Side-
walks shall be provided corner to corner along the entire
perimeter frontage, except for University Drive, to City of
Carson standards. Mitigation measures at Central and
University, Central and Victoria, and University and
Wilmington shall be completed by the applicant as concep-
tually shown in the EIR/Specific Plan, Appendices 2,
Appendix E. 'Conceptual Sketches of Existing and Proposed
Roadway Geometrics' and as required by the Director of
Public Works.
i
86. Driveways. Direct access onto arterials shall be
limited to those driveways required to serve individual lots
as determined by the Director of Public Works at the time of
building permit issuance.
102. Fire Protection Services. Deleted by action of
the City Council on October 29, 1990.
901109 sas A500WP51.KGE (86)
EXHIBIT B-1
Ord. 90-924 Page 10 of 11
110. Private Security. Developer shall provide or
cause to be provided private security acceptable to the
City's Director of Community Development throughout the
Project area commencing upon the inception of construction
of the Project. This condition shall not expire at the
completion of construction but shall continue as long as the
Project site is used as an industrial/office/technology/
commercial site, and shall be binding upon Developer's
successors and assigns.
126. Congestion Management Program. In the event that
(a) a Congestion Management Program (Government Code Section
65088, et seq. , as amended) is adopted by the designated
agency which establishes levels of service standards or
other requirements for street segments, intersections and/or
freeway on or off-ramps within the City, and (b) the desig-
nated agency identifies the City as being in nonconformance
with the Program or the City adopts a deficiency plan pursu-
ant to Government Code Section 65089. 3, which identifies the
Project as a contributing cause to one or more of the defi-
ciencies listed in the Program, then Developer shall at its
option do either of the following: (a) pay a portion of the
cost of correcting the deficiency which portion shall be
determined by multiplying the percentage that the Project is
estimated to contribute to the deficiency by the estimated
cost of correcting the deficiency, or (b) correct its pro-
portionate share of the deficiency. The above-mentioned
cost or share shall be determined by the City Council based
upon its consideration of a traffic study and other
evidence.
127. Additional Mitigation Measures. City may impose
mitigation measures in addition to the measures required as
a condition of approval of the Specific Plan in the event a
state or federal law or regulation is enacted or applied
after the adoption of the Specific Plan which requires, or
makes it reasonably necessary for the City to impose, addi-
tional mitigation measures or requirements on the Project or
Property.
128. Financing of Off-Site Mitigation Measures.
Developer shall carry out or bond for all off-site
improvements identified in paragraph H of Section 10 of
Ordinance No. 90-924 . In the event that the agency or
agencies having jurisdiction over the property on which
the improvement is to be located either (a) fail to
approve construction of the improvements within the
time limits specified in Government Code Sections
65950-52 or (b) fail to obtain possession (pursuant to
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1255.410 or otherwise)
of the property within 120 days of such agency's
approval of construction of the improvement
(hereinafter the "Delayed Improvement") , then Developer
shall bond for 100% of the cost of the Delayed Improve-
ments when notified by the City to do so. Developer
shall not be required to complete the Delayed
Improvement yithi.n the time period otherwise specified
in the Specific Plan, but Developer shall instead be
obligated to complete the Delayed Improvement as soon
as reasonably practicable and in accordance with the
City's guidelines for such construction, as provided in
a timetable agreed upon by and between the Developer
and the Director of Public Works. The amount of the
bond shall be reduced from time to time as a portion or
portions of the improvements are constructed so that
the amount of the bond shall be equal to the estimated
901109 eae A500WP51.KGE (86)
EXHIBIT B-2
Ord. 90-924 Page 11 of 11
cost of the improvements not yet constructed. The
amount of the bond shall be adjusted annually in the
same percentage as changes in the Consumer Price Index,
All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside Statistical Area (1982-84=100) , as published
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The date from which
the change in the index is to be computed shall be the
initial date of the bond. The bond shall remain in
effect until the improvements are constructed or until
January 1, 2006 whichever occurs first.
Notwithstanding the expiration and release of such
bond, Developer's obligation to construct the
improvements shall remain until construction of the
improvements is completed.
The City shall impose a fee on other proposed
development projects in the City in the vicinity of the
improvements which fees shall be determined on the
basis of (a) the total cost of the off-site traffic
improvements and (b) the extent to which such other
development projects will generate additional traffic
volumes which contribute to the need for the off-site
traffic improvements. The cost of any traffic study
required to determine these amounts shall be paid for
by the Developer. The City shall make reasonable good-
faith efforts to assist in obtaining rights-of-way and
other necessary approvals from the appropriate state or
local governments and to enter into one or more agree-
ments with the State of California and other local
governments with jurisdiction over the areas of the
improvements for collection of fees from development
projects located in those jurisdictions in the vicinity
of such improvements which contribute to the need for
the improvements. The City will also use its best
efforts to secure funds and grants from the County,
state and federal government to help pay for the cost
of making the improvements, except that nothing
contained herein shall be construed to require the City
to provide other funds for the cost of the improvements
listed in paragraph H of Section 10 of Ordinance No.
90-924 . Upon Developer's completion of the improve-
ments, any fees derived under such conditions and
agreements shall be paid over to the Developer as
partial reimbursement not to exceed an amount equal to
the percentage which such other development projects
contribute to the need for the off-site traffic
improvement. The Developer's proportionate share of
the cost of the improvements required by this condition
shall be determined by the City Council based upon its
consideration of a traffic study and other evidence.
129. Further Approval of Phase III. Deleted by action
of the City Council on October 29, 1990.
901109 sas A500WP51.KGE (86)
EXHIBIT B-3