Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout08) 7F Award of Consultant Services Agreement Elie Farah Safe Route to School (SR2S), CIP P13-13AGENDA ITEM 75. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: July 16, 2013 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Jose E. Pulido, City Manage- Via: Mark Persico, AICP, C unity Development Director By: Bryan Ariizumi, Public Safety Supervisor SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ELIE FARAH INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S) PROJECT, CIP NO. P13-13 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to: a) Approve a Consultant Services Agreement with Elie Farah, Inc (EFI) to design and engineer a variety of pedestrian and vehicular improvements funded by the State Legislated Safe Routes to School program; and b) Authorize the City Manager to execute the aforementioned Consultant Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $19,655. BACKGROUND: 1. On March 30, 2012, the City submitted an application to California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for funding through the State Legislated Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program, which identified pedestrian and vehicular safety improvements around nine school sites (i.e., Longden Elementary, Oak Avenue Intermediate, Temple City High, Emperor Elementary, First Lutheran, La Rosa Elementary, Cloverly Elementary, Cleminson Elementary, and Longley Way Elementary). 2. On June 29, 2012, Caltrans awarded the City $431,900 of SR2S Cycle 10 project funds. Temple City was one of 139 projects selected out of 333 applications submitted. Award of funds stipulated the completion of projects by December 2016. City Council July 16, 2013 Page 2 of 3 3. On December 13, 2012, the City's engineering consultant, Transtech, prepared and submitted a Request for SR2S Funding Allocation to Caltrans. 4. On January 28, 2013, Caltrans notified the City that necessary funds have been allocated and that any work done on the project after this date would be eligible for reimbursement. 5. On May 30, 2013, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for SR2S, Safe Routes to School Project (State Funded) Project which allowed interested firms to submit a proposal to the City by June 28, 2013 (Attachment "A"). 6. On April 16, 2013, the City published a Notice Inviting Bids in the Pasadena Star News to advertise the City's RFP for the Preparation of PS&E for SR2S, Safe Routes to School Project. 7. On April 16, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-4905, authorizing the City Manager to sign the Administering Agency -State Master Agreement and the Program Supplement Agreement for state funded projects. 8. On June 4, 2013, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14 City Budget, which included an allocation of $431,900 SR2S funds and $52,000 General Funds. The $52,000 is the City's share of the cost to implement the improvements. 9. On June 17, 2013, a Clarification to Questions (Attachment "B") was issued to provide a response to five questions submitted by interested parties. 10. On June 28, 2013, the Community Development Department received a total of six proposals for the preparation of PS&E for SR2S (i.e., Elie Farah, Inc.; JMD; KOA Corporation; PacRim Engineering; Transportation and Energy Solutions, Inc.; and Quantum Quality Consulting, Inc.). 11. On July 1, 2013, the City's Selection Committee (i.e., City Engineer Cayir, Public Safety and Services Manager Sahagun, and Community Preservation Officer Aceves) completed their review of the six proposals received by the City and selected Elie Farah, Inc. Since 2010, City staff has been working with Temple City Unified School District (TCUSD) staff to identify needed pedestrian safety improvements around school sites within Temple City. That year, the City applied for SR2S funding but was not successful. Since then, Temple City has been making progress in improving pedestrian safety by successfully obtaining SR2S funds and adopting a Citywide Traffic Calming City Council July 16, 2013 Page 3 of 3 Master Plan. The improvements identified in the City's SR2S project (i.e., installation of five foot wide sidewalks; speed feedback signs; new •traffic signs and crosswalk striping; wheelchair ramps; solar powered pedestrian actuated lights and crosswalks; and flashing beacon school speed limit signs) have been incorporated into the Traffic Calming Master Plan. The SR2S project is a significant step forward in improving pedestrian safety and it implements important portions of the Traffic Calming Master Plan. Listed below is the proposed schedule for the SR2S project: City Council Award of Design Contract Design Completion Advertise Construction Plans for Contractor Bids Award Construction Contract to a Contractor Start Construction Work Complete Construction Work CONCLUSION: July 16, 2013 October/November 2013 November/December 2013 December/January 2013 January/February 2014 June/July 2014 In order to initiate this project, the City Council is requested to accept the bid for the professional design and engineering services for the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Project submitted by Elie Farah, Inc. in the amount of $19,665 as the lowest, responsive, and responsible bid, and authorize the City Manager to execute a Consultant Services Agreement with Elie Farah, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: On June 4, 2013, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14 City Budget, which included $483,900 in the Capital Improvement Program for this project (P13-13). ATTACHMENTS: A. RFP for Preparation of PS&E for Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Project B. Clarifications to Questions C. Elie Farah, Inc. Proposal D. Agreement between the City of Temple City and Elie Farah, Inc. ATTACHMENT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DELIVERY ADDRESS Community Development Department 9701 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780 Attn: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director PROPOSALS SUBMITTAL 3 copies May 30, 2013 CONTACT INFORMATION FOR INQUIRIES contact via e-mail only, no telephone calls Selim Bouhamidi Project Coordinator selim.bouhamidi C@transtech.orR PROPOSALS DUE June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY May 30, 2013 To interested d consultants: The City Temple City is seeking proposals from qualified consultants to provide engineering services for preparation of PS&E for SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT. Enclosed, is a copy of the Request for Proposals (RFP). Scope of Work Description: Provide engineering services for preparation of PS&E for the project in compliance with the approved funding program scope of work. Pre -Proposal Meeting: None. Questions: For questions regarding this project, please contact via e-mail only: Selim Bouhamidi, Project Coordinator se l i m. bo u h a m i d i C@ t ra n stech. o re Proposal Submittal: Interested consultants can submit their proposals in compliance with the attached RFP requirements as indicated below: Submit your proposal by the following due date: June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm Submit your proposal by delivering 3 copies to: Mark Persico, ACP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 RFP release authorized by: Mark Persico, AICP, Community Development Director PI\W PROCESS\IORRECRD\2019\19013 TCSRZS FurvowG ALWfATION PACKAGE\W IP\RESIGN RFP\RFP PoR SVS LESIGN SERVICES, TEMPLE aLY DOC RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY May 30, 2013 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK The City of TEMPLE CITY is soliciting Proposals (hereinafter referred to as RFP) from qualified consultants to provide engineering design services to prepare PS&E for SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED), IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. The scope of work for the project includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1. The scope of work provided in this RFP shall be used as a guideline; however, it is the consultant's responsibility to provide all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. • Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. • Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create a base map of existing conditions. • Prepare plans and details. • Prepare specifications. Prepare cost estimates. • Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. • Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. • Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: o First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. o City will take 2 weeks for the review. o Final submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review comments. • Provide bi-weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. • Attend 3 project meetings. Final Product: PS&E Bid Package ready for bidding, including 1 wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, MsWord file of Specifications, Excel file of Estimates, pdf file of all other documents. RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Page 1 Note: City will be responsible for Public Outreach & Education, Construction management, Inspection Components of the Project 2. REQUIRED FORMAT FOR PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL Proposals shall not exceed 25 pages in length, and shall include the following information: • Cover Letter: Not to exceed 2 pages (not counted as part of 25 page limit). • Table of Contents (not counted as part of 25 page limit). A. Scope of Work: The Consultant shall include in its proposal a detailed scope of work and understanding of the process to undertake such projects and complete it in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations, standards and requirements. B. Project Staff Qualifications: Provide an organization chart showing the names and responsibilities of key personnel. Provide resumes of key personnel identified in the organization chart. C. References: Provide 3 public agency references for past similar projects. D. Company Qualifications: Provide a summary of your firm's general qualifications and service capabilities. E. Fee. Provide a detailed fee by tasks and staff. 3. QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES For questions regarding this project, please contact via e-mail only: Selim Bouhamidi Project Coordinator selim.bouhamidi antranstech.ore Responses will be posted 10 days prior to the proposal submittal deadline on City's website under the RFPs/RFQs section (htto://www.ci.temDle-citv.ca.us/RFPs%20RFQs/RFQs.asD 4. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL PROTOCOL Submit your proposal by the following due date: June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm Submit your proposal by delivering 3 copies to: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Page 2 City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 Required copies of Proposal: 3 copies S. CONSULTANT SELECTION The City will evaluate the proposals submitted, and select the most qualified consultant for the project. The proposals will be evaluated based upon several factors. These factors include the format, organization, and presentation of the proposal, the qualification and experience of the project staff, and the experience in the processes and procedures of the involved regulations. In evaluating the proposals, the City will consider the following factors: Completeness of the Proposals and compliance with the required format. • Project understanding, scope and approach to develop the project efficiently. • Knowledge in Public Agency Procedures and Requirements. • Experience in similar projects. • Experience and qualifications of the firm and the project team members. • Experience in the funding requirements and process to be followed. • References and performance records on similar assignments. The City will negotiate final scope and fee with the most qualified consultant. 6. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The City of Temple City shall not be liable for any pre -contractual expenses incurred by any proposing firm (proponent) in response to this RFP, nor shall any proponent include such expenses as part of the proposed cost. Pre -contractual expenses include any expense incurred in preparing a proposal and negotiating any terms with the City. 2. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice and to reject any and all proposals submitted without indicating any reasons. Any award of contract for services will be made to the proponent that is best qualified and responsive in the opinion of the City. 3. Proposals may, at the City's option, be rejected if they contain any alterations, additions, conditions or alternatives, are incomplete, or contain erasures or irregularities of any kind. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone the opening of submittals for its own convenience and to reject any and all submittals responding to this Request for Proposals. 4. Consultant must agree to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and assigns from any and all liability or loss resulting from any suits, claims or actions brought against the City which result directly or indirectly from the wrongful or negligent actions of the Consultant in the performance of the contract. RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Page 3 5. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) annual aggregate; and automobile liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per accident. (A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount not less than $2,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits for each of the foregoing.) Where Consultant is required to carry professional liability insurance covering liability arising from any error, omission or negligent act of Consultant, its officers, or employees, Consultant shall procure and maintain such coverage with a limit of liability of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. All such insurance coverages shall be procured from an insurer authorized to do business in California and approved in writing by the City. The City shall be named as an additional insured. In addition, the Consultant and sub- contractors, if any, shall obtain workers' compensation insurance covering all its employees as required by law. Throughout the term of the contract, the Consultant shall deliver to the City satisfactory evidence that the insurance has been renewed and that the required premiums have been paid. 6. Consultant will be required to comply with all existing state and federal labor laws including those applicable to equal opportunity employment provisions. 7. Consultant is required to have in full force and affect all licenses and permits required by all applicable laws. Consultant shall obtain a Temple City Business License during the term of the contract. 8. Consultant shall at all times provide services with the utmost respect to the public. All employees of Consultant shall wear clean clothing in the performance of their duties and equipment shall be cleaned and maintained in a safe operating manner. All equipment shall be subject to inspection by the City at any time. All Consultant personnel shall wear appropriate safety gear at all times while working in Temple City. Consultant shall provide satisfactory warning devices that meet the requirements of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act (Cal -OSHA) for protection of workers when and where required at all times in the performance of this contract. 9. Consultant, its agents, and employees shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of the federal and state governments, the County of Los Angeles, the City of Temple City and all governing bodies having jurisdiction applying to work done under the agreement. 10. The City reserves the right to negotiate special requirements and proposed service levels using the selected proposal as a basis. Compensation for services will be negotiated with the Consultant. 11. Consultant shall not sublet any portion of the agreement with the City without express written permission of the City Manager or his or designated representative. 12. No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons because of the race, color, or religion of such persons and every proposer in violation of this section is subject to all penalties imposed for a violation of Chapter 1 of Part VII, Division 2 of the Labor Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1753 thereof. RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT—TEMPLE CIN RFP, Page 4 13. The City reserves the right to review and approve the qualifications of subcontracting firms or persons. Substitutions that are not approved are considered sufficient grounds for termination of contract. 14. The City, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy or transcribe any pertinent transaction, activity, time and work records, employment records or other records relating to personnel employed by the Consultant. Such material, including all pertinent cost accounting, financial records and proprietary data, will be kept and maintained by the Consultant for a period of at least four years after completion of a Consultant's performance unless the City's written permission is given to dispose of same prior to that time. 15. All responses to this RFP shall become the property of the City of Temple City and will be retained or disposed of accordingly. 16. No amendments, additions, or alternates shall be accepted after the submission deadline. 17. All documents, records, designs, and specifications developed by the Consultant in the course of providing services to the City of Temple City shall be the property of the City. Anything considered to be proprietary should be so designated by the Consultant. 18. Acceptance by the City of any qualification submitted pursuant to this RFP shall not constitute any implied intent to enter into a contract for services. 19. The City reserves the right to issue written notice to all interested parties of any change in the qualification submission schedule should the City determine, in its sole discretion, that such changes are necessary. Attachment 1: Funding Documents Attachment 2: City Standard Contract RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Page 5 i r I REQUEST FOR SR2S FUNDING ALLOCATION To; _Mr, David_Sosa Date_ December 13. 2012 District Local Assistance Engineer Caltrans, Office of Local Assistance. Project No.: 100 S. Main Street, 12`s Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 EA: Construct Sidewalks and curb mums: install (solar nowered) pedestrian activated crosswalks. Sneed feedback signs, flashing beacons. signs, and strining. City of Temple City: Loneden/Oak: Camino Real/Oak: Temple Citv/Lemon: Muscatel/Emperor: Broadway/Noel: La Rosa/Rio Honda: Broadwav/Cloverly: Daleview/Grand and Longley/W000druff. Los Angeles County Dear Mr. Sosa: We request that Caltrans allocate $431,900 of State funding for this SR2S project. Note: The amount of state funds requested should equal, but not exceed, the amount of fiords that were originally programmed for the project. This amount can be found on the SR2S web site at www.dot.ca.eov/ha/LocalPro2rams/saferoutes/sr2s list.htm Proiect Descrintion: Construct sidewalks and curb ramps; install (solar powered) pedestrian activated crosswalks, speed feedback signs, flashing beacons, signs, and striping. Improvements will occur at nine separate schools located at Longden Ave. between Oak Ave. and Temple City Blvd; Primrose Ave. between Wendon St. and Garibaldi Ave.; Warren Way/Live Oak Ave.; Oak Ave. between Emperor Ave. and Camino Real; Broadway/Noel; Cloverly between Broadway and Blackley St.; Daleview Ave. between Grand Ave. and Freer St.; Rosemead Blvd./Emperor Ave.; Pentland St. between Encinitas Ave. and Allesandro Ave.; Fratus. Dr. between La Rosa Dr. and Pentland St. Local Agency Certification: I certify that the information provided is accurate and correct. I understand that if the required information has not been provided, this form will be returned and the funding allocation may be delayed. Please advise us as soon as the fund allocation has been approved. You may direct any questions to Selim Bouhamidi at 760-574-7964. Signature Title: City Engineer Date: 12/13/12 Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer Acceptance: I have reviewed the information submitted on this Request for SR?S Funding Allocation and find it complete and accurate. Signature (Title) Attachments: - Project Application - Finance Letter - Approved Project List Distribution: (1) Original+ I copy to DLAE Date: 1 M 1. es 0 N o c 0 . w u O. J IL O `y � M N m N ' Fp ' O p m W T Q `m ............. ..... p R d U p — e w u 0 v o ' G m r c m n m �n � a e e E v � o c w N N � v W T Q `m c a d U s w u G U N a Q a' Q O r O Q E2 Z Notice of Exemption To: Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk County of: Los Angeles 12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Room 2001 Norwalk, CA. 90650 Appendix E From: (Public Agency): City of Temple City Department of Community Development 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA. 91780 Project Title: Improvements for "Safe Routes to School' Project Applicant: City of Temple City (Address) Project Location - Specific: City of Temple City: Longden/Oak; Camino Real/Oak; Temple City/Lemon; Muscatel/Emperor; Broadway/Noel; La Rosa/Rio Honda; Broadway/Cloverly; Daleview/Grand and Longley/W000druff. Project Location - City: City of Temple City Project Location - County: Los Angeles Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: The City of Temple City will make improvements to existing public and school facilities for the purpose of increased pedestrian and bicycle safety including constructing sidewalks and curb ramps; installing (solar powered) pedestrian activated crosswalks, speed feedback signs, flashing beacons, signs, and striping. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Temple City Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Temple City Exempt Status: (check one): O Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ❑ Statutory Exemptions. State code number: Reasons why project is exempt: There is no discretionary action required for the subject project and no changes in land uses or increases in capacity would occur. All improvements will take place within existing public right-of-way and within each campus. No changes will be made to existing sidewalks or roadways. Lead Agency Ali Cayir, PE Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone/Extension- If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project?. ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature: Date: 12/13/12 Title: City Engineer 0 Signed by Lead Agency ❑ Signed by Applicant Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR: Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. Revised 2011 is o N to � Q LL N Pm � pN M � P w C f5 ai vi NW a K m N U u p O — " In p F - oH- E m E 5E E a w _ - y mig E ',�p`u v tTc om _aL '9 ciN cis o'°- _a`�ci vn�ci a�,m cia os o a> a a Ev�N r a? O m O N N m n U v E 'O LL o y O h o E 2 W W `m 9 a O v E? W r N N N p y E r L N a o f m U E O N � 6NS.iKU Q 4 T J O p V rcj m C N p C ry p P r r c) M N O v O 1 W _ _ — o myc c V) a K K K ll ll K K K K K K W N N N N N N N fn N (n fn m N m Application ID: S112S10-07-Temple City -1 Exhibit A APPLICATION FOR STATE -LEGISLATED SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S) PROGRAM CYCLE 10 APPLICATION SUMMARY This summary page is filled out automatically once the application is completed. IMPORTANT: After the application is finalized, please save this PDF form using the Application ID as the file name. Application ID: (Use this as the file name) Caltrans District: Applicant (Agency): Application No: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 07 Temple City 1 out of 1 SR2S Funds Requested: $431,900.00 Project Description Install five feet wide sidewalks, speed feedback signs, new traffic signs and crosswalk striping, ADA ramps, solar ped actuated lights and crosswalks, and flashing beacon school speed limit signs. Project Location Nine separate schools located at intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff. Page 1 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 STATE -LEGISLATED SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S) PROGRAM APPLICATION ( CYCLE 10) Please read the Safe Routes to School Program Guidelines available on the SR2S web site and pay special attention to Application Form Instructions while preparing this application. An incomplete or altered application format will be disqualified from further review. The agency must save the completed PDF form using the application ID as the file name. Please send the original, one color copy and a copy on CD of the application form and attachments to the DLAE by the due date of Friday, March 30, 2012 (by close of business of or postmarked no later than this date) . Refer to the DLA's web site for the DLAE in your District and the mailing address: htto://www.dot.ca.gov/ho/LocalProerams/dlae.htm. Applicant (Agency): (Temple City County: Caltrans District: I. Applicant Information Los Angeles County 07 Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): ISCAG Address: 19701 Las Tunas Drive City: (Temple City Zip Code: ICA 91780 I (Enter only a 5 -digit number.) Name of Agency Contact Person (Lost, First): 1Ariizumi, Bryan Phone Number: 1(626) 285-2171 Email: Ibariizumi@templecity.us Page 2 of 12 Extension:) December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S70-07-Temple City -1 II. School Information *All schools benefited by this SR2S Project are to be listed School No. 1 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) FiT91- 16 15 10 15 12 I- 16 10 1212 1915 18 I Full School Name: ILongden Elementary School I School Address: 19501 Wendon St, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: ITemple City Unified School District District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr,Temple City, CA 91780 1 Total Student Enrollment 991 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 450 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program0): 3 %%(Enter 0-100) %of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 40 %(Entero -100) (1) Refer to the California Department of Education website: http:/htiv .cde.ca.govldslsl?lmffiilesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 2 County -District -School Code (CDS)(i) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 161 D 12 1219 16 161 Full School Name: IOak Avenue Intermediate School School Address: 16623 Oak Avenue, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: ITemple City Unified School District I District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment 951 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 500 %ofStudents Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 40 % (Enter o-100) • of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 50 % (Enter o-100) (1) Refer to the California Department of Education website: hap://Ufwv.cde.ca.gov/dsl.vlilcwTiilesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 3 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 1 - 119 13 18 16 17 19 Full School Name: ITemple City High School I School Address: 19501 Lemon Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: ITemple City Unified School District District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 1 Total Student Enrollment E71 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 1,000 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program0): 37 %(Enter 0-100) %ofStudents who Currently Walk orBicycle toSchool: 50 % (Enter o-100) (I)Refertothe Califorivia DepartnentofEducatioiux,ebsite: http://venin.cde.ca.gov/dslshlnvlftlescfdc. asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school Page 3 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SKS10-07-Temple City -1 School No. 4 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 10 12 12 19 13 13 Full School Name: IEmperor Elementary School School Address: 16415 Muscatel Ave, San Gabriel, CA 91755 School District: (Temple City Unified School District I District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 1 Total Student Enrollment 665 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 200 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced MealsProgram0): 34 %(Entero -100) %of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 24 %(Entero -100) (1) Refer to the California Department of Education website: http://www.cde.ca.govldslshlciv/frlesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as Croute students would take between hone and school School No. 5 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 19 16 12 12 10 13 Full School Name: IFirst Lutheran School I School Address: 19123 Broadway Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: IPrivate School District Address: 19123 Broadway Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment171 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 20 • of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced MealsProgram(1): 1 %% (Enter o-100) • of Students who CurrentlyWalkor Bicycle to School: 1 %% (Enter o-100) (1) Refer to the California Department ofEducation website: http://l ,tw.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/cw/filesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students world take between hone and school School No. 6 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 10 12 12 19 14 I 1 Full School Name: ILa Rosa Elementary School School Address: 19301 La Rosa Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (Temple City Unified School District District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 1 Total Student Enrollment 582 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 200 %ofStudents Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 39 %(Entero -100) %of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: El%(Enter 0-100) (1) Refer to the California Department ofEducatiou website. htip:/h+ww.cde.ca.gov/d`slsldcw/filesafdc.a.vp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school Page 4 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 School No. 7 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 579-1 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 10 12 12 19 12 15 Full School Name: ICloverly Elementary School School Address: 15476 Cloverly Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: ITemple City Unified School District 1 District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 1 Total Student Enrollment447 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 150 • ofStudents Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 40 % (Enter o-100) • of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 30 % (Enter o-100) (1) Refer to the California Department of Education ivebsite: http://lt�v.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/"r filesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 8 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9- 16 14 15 10 I 1 1- 16 10 I 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 18 Full School Name: ICleminson Elementary School School Address: 15213 N Daleview Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (EI Monte City Elementary School District District Address: 13540 Lexington Ave, EI Monte, CA 91731 1 Total Student Enrollment 399 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 200 • ofStudents Eligible fortheFree and Reduced Meals Program(1): 24 % (Enter o-100) %of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 45 %(Enter 0-100) (I) Refer to the California Depalmeat of Education website: http:II"m.cde.ca.gov/ds/slv/ew/filesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 9 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9- 16 14 12 16 11 I- 1 610 1 11 11 1 1 9 1 1 Full School Name: ILongley Way Elementary School School Address: 12601 Longley Way, Arcadia, CA 91007 School District: 1 Arcadia Unified School District 1 District Address: 1234 Campus Dr, Arcadia, CA 91007 Total Student Enrollment 485 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 50 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 22 %(Enter 0-100) • of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 11 % (Enter o-100) (1) Refer to the California Department of Education website: http:1Av4w.cde. ca.gov/ds/sh/CwTi/esafdc. asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school Page 5 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2Si0-07-Temple City -1 III. Project Information Project Description: Provide a brief description of the proposed project improvements i.e. Construct new sidewalks, curb ramps, and crosswalks; install bicycle racks and lockers (limited to 250 characters). (Install five feet wide sidewalks, speed feedback signs, new traffic signs and crosswalk striping, ADA ramps, solar ped actuated lights and crosswalks, and flashing beacon school speed limit signs. Project Location: Provide a brief description of the general location(s) of the proposed project i.e. The intersection of First St and Second St. (limited to 250 characters). Nine separate schools located at intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff. State Legislative Districts of project location (separate Districts bycommas when thereare multiple): Assembly District: 121, 24, 29 1 Senate District: 144,49 1 Number of project applications being submitted by the applicant (agency): Priority of this application: 11 Note: Priority of this application is required. The application must be ranked and prioritized with the priority number starting from i V V is the highest priority. No two applications may have the same priority number. Also enter'l"if this is the only application from your agency.) Improvement categories included in the proposed project: (check all that apply) ❑Q Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle Facilities Traffic Control Devices ® Traffic Calming and Speed Reduction ® Public Outreach and Education Other (describe below, max 100 characters) Page 6 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2510-07-Temple City -1 IV. Project Cost Estimate Please round all costs to the nearest hundreds. Once all costs are entered, click "Check Cost Estimate" to perform validation. Click it to check again each time when the costs have been revised. In some cases, the review committee may recommend that a project be funded providing certain components are removed from the project scope. Will the applicant proceed with the construction of the project if its scope and cost are reduced? yes SR2S Funds Local/Other Funds (6) Total Cost Preliminary Engineering(2) Environmental I $0 I 1$0 ( I $0 PS&E I $18,000 1$2,000 1$20,000 Right of Way Engineering 1$0 Iso 1$0 Appraisals, Acquisitions 1$0 I $0 I 1$0 & Utilities Construction Engineering & Construction Construction Engineering (3) 1$10,400 I $1,100 1$11,500 Construction (1) 1$385,500 I 1$51,900 I 1$437,400 Public Outreach & Education and Minor Construction Improvements(4) Education, enforcement, and encouragement activities J$18,000 I $2,000 Construction on school grounds I Total Project Cost (5) J$431,900 $57,000 1$20,000 •r1 (1) For construction cost (including contingencies), provide a detailed Engineer's Estimate (use form provided on SR2S web site). (2) Total Cost of Preliminary Engineering may not exceed 25% of the Construction "Total Cost". (3) Total Cost of Construction Engineering may not exceed 15% of the Construction "Total Cost". (4) Total Cost of Public Outreach & Education and Minor Construction Improvements to Public School Grounds may not exceed 10% of the Construction "Total Cost". (5) SR2S funds may not exceed 90% of "Total Cost" or $450,000. (6) Local match (10% or more) to be included by phase of work. Check Cost Estimate Page 7 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SKS10-07-Temple City -1 V. Project Schedule Estimated dates of completion for the major milestones shown below assuming the project is approved for funding on July 1, 2012. Refer to the SR2S Program Delivery Requirements in the Cycle 10 SR2S Guidelines. Please enter durations (in month) and estimated dates of completion will be calculated. Target Project Approval Date: Request Allocation of SR2S Funds: Complete Environmental Document: Obtain Right of Way Clearance: Award Construction Contract: Complete Construction: Project Close-out: Page 8 of 12 Duration (Months) Estimated Date of Completion 07/01/2012 2 I 08/30/2012 2 I 10/29/2012 0 I 10/29/2012 1 I 11/28/2012 3 I 02/27/2013 2 I I 04/28/2013 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -i VI. Evaluation Criteria The applicant's responses to the following questions will be used to evaluate the proposed project. Rating factors RF) and the required statute in the Streets and Highways Code [SH] have been provided for each question. Scores from applicant responses to these questions will be totaled to yield the final score. The scoring rubrics have been posted on the SR2S web site. 1. Public participation and planning process that contributed to the development and selection of this proposed project. Describe how the target school(s) were selected and prioritized among potential SR2S projects in the local community or region. Describe how community priorities were identified and community input was gathered to guide the development of the project included in the proposal, and what measures were taken to ensure that community priorities are reflected in the proposal. Describe how the process secured the support of relevant stakeholders, and involved a public participation process that included a public meeting involving the public, schools, parents, teachers, local agencies, the business community, key professionals and other relevant parties. Cite the stakeholder names and organizations/agencies and describe their participation. (RF 6&7) [SH 2333.5(b)(6)] (Max. Pts 20) (limited to 3,000 characters). In November 2011, the City of Temple City conducted a Citywide Traffic Calming Master Plan workshop. The workshop brought together participants to learn about traffic calming and the traffic calming options in the City's toolbox, and to discuss what areas of the City would benefit most from traffic calming. Areas around schools were identified as very critical to these efforts. At this workshop, the City introduced and promoted Temple City's Safe Routes to School program, which makes walking and bicycling to school safe, easy, and enjoyable for the children of Temple City. The program is built around the nationally recognized model of the 5 E's: Engineering, Encouragement, Education, Enforcement, and Evaluation. Diverse community stakeholders were brought together to gather support for the program and to share concerns, interests and knowledge to make walking and bicycling to school safer and more attractive. The City's Safe Routes to School program is a citywide project targeting the following schools in and around the City: Longden Elementary School, Oak Avenue Intermediate School, Temple City High School, Emperor Elementary School, La Rosa Elementary School, Cloverly Elementary School, Cleminson Elementary School, First Lutheran School and Longley Way Elementary School. The following stakeholders were invited and participated in the workshop: community residents, local business owners, School Principals, PTA representatives, Local Law Enforcement, City Traffic Engineers, local pedestrian, bicycle and safety advocates, local planners, and school crossing guards. The School principals were provided maps of the surrounding schools and were asked to draw the most common routes children take to walk and bike to schools. Participants were invited to talk about concerns they identified including safety, health, traffic congestion, and the alarming decreasing trend in walking and biking to school. Temple City's Safe Routes to School Program will seek solutions to these issues through a combination of strategies including engineering, encouragement, education, and enforcement. Representatives of each school were asked what off site improvements can be made to help increase walking and biking to their schools. These problems and ideas were noted and summarized (see attached School Survey Feedback). Finally, participants discussed the next steps that needed to take place and established a working time line. 2. Identification of current and proposed walking and bicycling routes to school. Did the planning process develop into a school travel plan, safe routes to school plan, or school route plan? If yes, please describe briefly and attach a copy of the plan to this application. If no, please describe any future plans to develop one. (RF 5) [SH 2333.5(b)(5)] (Max Pts 5) (limited to 3,000 characters). The City currently has in place a Bicycle Master Plan which was approved by City Council on March 15, 2011 (see attached Bikeways Map). The Bicycle Plan includes a network of designated class I, II and III bikeways and additional safety improvements which links cyclists to schools, parks, transit hubs, the regional Rio Hondo Bike Trail and other key destinations. The City will also build off the momentum of its citywide Safe Routes to School program and create a future Safe Routes to School Plan. This plan will detail the methods and show the actions that the community and schools will target to increase walking and bicycling to school. The plan will help gather community support by establishing a Safe Routes to School task force, set priorities and publicize the findings generated by the program. The plan will incorporate education, encouragement, engineering and enforcement strategies, build a time schedule for each of these strategies, create a map of the area covered by the plan, and provide a method in which the program will be evaluated. The plan will help maintain the momentum of the program and sustain the program over time while making walking and bicycling to school safer, easier, and more enjoyable. Page 9 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: 5132S10 -07 -Temple City -1 3. Existing Safety Hazards and Demonstrated Needs of the Applicant. Describe each safety risk/hazard that has been encountered at the project location when walking or bicycling to school and the extent and severity of each. Discuss how each item was determined to be a risk/hazard. (e.g. cite data such as accident reports, community observations, surveys, reports, walk or bicycle audits.) (RF 1&4) [SH 2333.5(b)(1)] (Max. Pts 30) (limited to 3,000 characters). General Conditions: Accident data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for years 2007, 2008 and 2009 demonstrate that a clear and apparent danger exists to Temple City pedestrians and bicyclists. 634 accidents occurred in the City during this time span. Of these accidents, 22 involved pedestrians causing injuries to 25 persons, 4 of whom were injured severely. During these three years, another 23 accidents involved bicyclists causing injuries to 22 persons. The following safety hazards exist in the area and are responsible for the dangerous conditions facing students who choose to walk and bike to school: sidewalk gaps, excessive speeds, and improper signage and striping. Sidewalk Gaps: Students are discouraged from walking to school where sidewalks are missing as this creates unsafe conditions for pedestrians exposing them to fast-moving vehicular traffic. Sidewalks provide a safe haven and refuge for pedestrians and help create clearly defined access routes to and from school. Furthermore, pedestrian facilities must be accessible and usable by all pedestrians, especially those with disabilities as well as children. During field assessments, five areas lacking sidewalks were identified as high risk and in need of improvements. These areas are located on identified safe routes to school in the proximity of Longden, Emperor, La Rosa, Cloverly and Cleminson Elementary Schools. There are a total of 3,084 students enrolled at these five schools. Of this total, approximately 34 percent or 1,056 students walk or bike to school. Excessive Speeds: Excessive traffic speeds greatly increase the likelihood of pedestrians being hit and severely injured by motorists. Speed management is a significant priority in creating safe routes for children to walk and bike to school. Reduced speeds allow more opportunity for pedestrians and motorists to properly see and react to one another. On January 12, 2012, a radar speed survey was conducted which determined the 85th percentile speed driven by Temple City drivers. This survey demonstrates that excessive speed is an issue for streets surrounding local schools. Freer Street, which crosses Cleminson E.S., Pentland Street, which fronts La Rosa E.S., Longden Avenue, which fronts Longden E.S. have 85th percentile speeds of 33 mph, 34 mph and, 37 mph respectively. These are far too high and unacceptable relative to the 25 mph posted speed. Improper Signage and Striping: Many of the proposed school locations have signage and striping that is aged and fading or is lacking entirely. The visibility of children walking and biking to school is of the utmost importance. Proper delineation of signage and striping adds to a safe pedestrian friendly environment. Sources: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), field assessments, city recommendations, and school input were utilized to analyze safety hazards encountered at the project locations. 4. Potential of the Proposal for Reducing Child Injuries and Fatalities. Describe how the proposed project addresses each identified safety risk/hazard and how the project will improve bicycle and pedestrian safety and calm traffic. Explain why this proposed project is the best alternative for the situation. (RF 2) [SH 2333.5(b)(2)] (Max. Pts 30) (limited to 3,000 characters). Proposed Improvements: The following proposed improvements answer the demonstrated needs outlined above, and are pivotal in reducing child injuries and fatalities to create safe routes to Temple City schools. The City will install five foot wide sidewalks at various locations. Continuous sidewalks provide people with space to move safely within the public right-of-way that is separated from motor vehicles. By creating a protective buffer space, sidewalks significantly reduce pedestrian collisions with motorists. The City will also install speed feedback signs. These devices measure and display vehicle speed and caution speeding motorists. Due to the flashing lights of the feedback signs, motorists reduce their speeds near a crosswalk or a school. Another improvement consists of installing new traffic signs and crosswalk striping. Highly reflective and visible pedestrian crossing striping and signs increase the visibility of potential hazards to motorists, and thus increase compliance by drivers and ensure the safety of pedestrians. Furthermore, these improvements increase the use of crosswalks by pedestrians. The City also proposes to install ADA curb ramps. ADA ramps provide safe access between the sidewalks and roadway improving mobility for all including people using wheelchairs, strollers, handcarts and other similar devices. Solar Ped actuated lights and crosswalk will be installed as part of the proposal. Highly visible flashing LED lights embedded along the crosswalk provide a dynamic visual cue to motorists that pedestrians are present. Flashing LED lights are especially helpful when weather conditions, darkness, or heavy traffic obscure the crosswalk and traffic speed requires early warning for adequate stopping distance. Finally, the City will install flashing beacon school speed limit signs. These signs create improved visibility and caution motorists of an approaching school or crosswalk. Alternatives Considered: The City has considered but ultimately decided against the following alternatives: Overhead beacons, bulb outs, advanced limit lines and raised crosswalks. Overhead beacons are not needed as traditional signage will be adequate to alert motorists. Ped volumes and existing roadway widths do not support installing bulb outs. Advanced limit lines are not Page 10 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SKS10-07-Temple City -1 ladequate at many intersections where rolling stops and tast cornering are common. Finally, raised crosswalks In this case are not cost-effective and are problematic for emergency vehicles and street sweepers who commonly use these routes. 5. Potential of the Proposal for Encouraging Increased Walking and Bicycling Among Students. Describe how increased walking and bicycling among students will be encouraged and sustained after the project is completed. (e.g. partnership building, policy change, future funding, etc). Identify any specific education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation activities included in this project and attach a non -infrastructure activity worksheet, if applicable, to the application or explain any on-going efforts that support this project. (RF 3) [SH 2333.5(b)(3)] (Max. Pts 10) (limited to 3,000 characters). Infrastructure Improvements: The proposed infrastructure improvements will encourage walking and bicycling among students. School children will be encouraged to walk and ride their bicycles to and from schools when they are provided with continuous sidewalks along the routes. In -pavement flashing lights on the crosswalks will give students a sense of security from potential conflicts with on -coming traffic. The improved signage and high -visibility striping provided at the school locations will also help create a safe haven for students who walk and bike to school. Temple City Safe Routes to School Program: Under Temple City's Safe Routes to School Program, the City will promote walking and biking to school by offering activities and events that are fun, safe and easy. For example, the City will collaborate with schools, parents, local businesses and local police to organize and promote a Walk to School Day event. Other fun activities will be planned such as a Walking School Bus, which invites adults to walk along with a group of children to school. The program will also encourage schools to organize contests between classes to make walking and biking to school fun and competitive. The program will provide funding for crossing guard training to ensure the safety of school children walking to school. 6. Benefit to one or more low-income schools. Describe how the project will benefit low-income school(s) and what portion of the project funds will be directed towards providing this benefit. (RF 7) [SH 2333.5(b)(7)] (Max. Pts 5) (limited to 3,000 characters). All schools located within Temple City will see marked improvements to the safety of students walking and biking to school as a result of the Temple City Safe Routes to School Program. Ranges from 22 %to 40 % of students enrolled at Temple City schools are eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program. In addition, the City invited law -income residents to community workshops, encouraging them to be fully engaged in the planning process of the proposed project. The following attachments are required: A. A general map showing the location of all proposed improvements and their proximity to the school and school routes. Note: The map should clearly identify the route that students take to school. B. A site plan for each improvement location showing existing and proposed conditions. C. Detailed Engineer's Estimate (Use form provided on SR2S web site) D. Applicable'warrants' for projects with traffic control devices as required by California MUTCD (include Worksheet 4K-101 for Rapid Flashing Beacons at School Crossings) E. Non -Infrastructure Activity Worksheet, if applicable Photographs supplementing "A" and "B" above and letters of commitment and support from partners and advocacy groups are highly recommended. Page 11 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2510-07-Temple City -1 VIL Application Signatures Local Agency Official (City Engineer or Public Works Director): The undersigned affirms that the statements contained in the application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge. Signature: Date: Name (Last First): IMasura, Steven M. I Phone: 1(626) 028-5217 Title: I Director of Community Development I Email: lsmasura@templecity.us I School Official: The undersigned affirms that the school(s) benefited by this application is not on a school closure list that has been identified by the School District. Signature: Name (Last, First): 1Kang-Smith, Chelsea Title: ISuperintendent, Temple City U.S.D. Person to Contact for Questions Name (Last, First): (Bryan Ariizumi Title: I Public Safety Officer Date: 1 1 Phone: 1(626)548-5092 I Email: lckangsmith@tcusd.net I Phone: 1(626)285-2171 I Email: lbariizumi@templecity.us I Caltrans District Traffic Operations Office Approval If the SR2S project application proposes improvements on a freeway or state highway that affects the safety or operations of the facility, it is required that the proposed improvements be reviewed by the district traffic operations office and either a letter of support from the traffic operations office be provided or the signature of the traffic personnel be secured below. Signature: 1 Date: Name (Last, First): 1 1 Phone: 1 Title: 1 Email: ( 1 California Highway Patrol Approval If the SR2S project application proposes improvements on a freeway, state highway, or county road having California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement authority, a CHP Officer must must either write a letter of support or sign below to show support of the project Signature: 1 1 Date: Name (Last, First): 1 Phone: 1 Title: 1 1 Email: 1 Local Law Enforcement Agency Approval If the SR2S project application proposes improvements that is outside of CHP enforcement authority, it is recommended that the local law enforcement agency write a letter of support or sign below to show support of the project. Signature: 1 Date: Name (Last First): 1 Phone: 1 Title: 1 1 Email: 1 Page 12 of 12 December, 2011 1. Letters of Support 2. Detailed Engineer's Estimate 3. Non-Infrastructure Activity Worksheet 4. School Survey Feedback 5. Safetrec Pedestrian and Bicycle Collision Map 6. Temple City Bikeways Map 7. Existing Conditions Map 8. Proposed Improvements Map 9. Photo Exhibit 1W4611 INVIJIMA"A"AW146 Temple City Unified School District "A District of High Achieving Schools" March 9, 2012 Kirk Cessna, Office Chief Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation, District 7 100 South Main Street, #12-420 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Hye Jung (Chelsea) Kang -Smith, Ed.D. Superintendent Board of Education Ken Knollenberg Robert S. Ridley Matt W. Smith Kien Tiet Joe Walker RE: Support for the City of Temple City's Safe Routes to School Project: Cycle 10 Program Dear Mr. Cessna: The Temple City Unified School District is concerned about the safety of children in our community. We wish to support the proposed Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Cycle 10 Program Application. This is a much needed program for our City. It is understood that the Safe Routes to School program will require a team of individuals to perform many tasks including an assessment of conditions and needs, designing Temple City's SR2S program, implementing educational and promotional events for our children and parents, and evaluating the outcome of our efforts. I am willing to dedicate our District's resources wherever possible, including staff hours, to the Safe Routes to School program. I look forward to assisting in the Safe Routes to School program to increase the safety of our children, improve the physical and mental health of our children, and to potentially reduce traffic congestion near our schools. Therefore, I am in full support of Temple City's request for grant funding within the Cycle 10 Program. Sincerely, Chelsea Kang -Smith, Ed. D. Superintendent Temple City Unified School District Everybody can be great because anybody can serve. You don't have to make your subject and verb agree to serve. You only need a heartfull of grace, a soul generated by love."- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 970o Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 9i78o - 626-S48-5000 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Engineer's Preliminary Cost Estimate Safe Route to School Cycle 10 Various School Locations Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. No. I Item Description Longde i Elementry School 1 SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (ASSEMBLY C) WITH FLASHING BEACON ON LONGDEN AVE FOR EB AND WB TRAFFIC ZEBRA STRIPING WITH HIGHLY REFLECTIVE YELLOW PAINT AT 2 EXISTING CROSSWALKS AT PRIMROSE/LONGDEN, OAK/LONGDEN,TEMPLE CITY BLVD/LONGDEN AND 3 SCHOOLADVANCE WARNING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY D) ON LONGDEN FOR EB AND WB TRAFFIC 4 SCHOOL ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY A) ON PRIMROSE APPROACHING WENDON FROM SB AND NB DIRECTIONS YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPED XWALK ON WENDON AT PRIMROSE FOR 5 WEST LEG (WL) ONLY (existing 2 -way stop controlled) INSTALL ADA RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES ON NWC AND SWC 6 FOR CROSSWALK WL OF WENDON AND PRIMROSE INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON PRIMROSE BETWEEN WENDON AND 7 FLAHERTY ON WEST SIDE 8 INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON PRIMROSE BETWEEN FLAHERTY AND GARIBALDI ON EAST SIDE I 1 No. I Item Description 10ak Avinue Intermediate School Date 3/23/2012 Job No. 12017 Qty Unit Unit Price I Total Amount 1 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 2900 SF $4.25 $12,325 2 EA $250.00 $5001 2 EA $250.00 $500 290 SF $4.25 $1,233 2 EA $2,900.00 $5,800 280 LF $41.00 $11,480 340 LF $41.00 $13,9401 Total of Section $63,7781 1 Qty 1 Unit 1 Unit Price 1 Total Amountl I Page 1 of 4 INSTALL POST MOUNTED SOLAR PED ACTUATED LIGHTS AND XWALK AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON OAK AVE 1 AT CAMINO REAL. (LED LIT ASSEMBLY B WITH DOWNWARD FACING 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 ARROW AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS — R62E(CA) FOR NB AND SB DIRECTIONS)— Met warrants for installation per Chapter 4N.02 OF THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) 2 INSTALL ADA RAMPS AT XWALK AT OAK AND CAMINO REAL EAST 2 EA $2,900.00 $5,800 AND WEST SIDES 3 STRIPE SLOW SCHOOL XING IN ADVANCE OF UNPROTECTED XWALK 160 SF $3.20 $512 ON OAK APPROACHING CAMINO REAL (NB AND SB DIRECTIONS) 4 PROVIDE ADVANCE SCHOOL SIGNAGE (ASSEMBLY A) FOR XWALK AT 2 EA $250.00 $5001 OAKAND CAMINO REAL (NB AND SB DIRECTIONS) PROVIDE 1 (Rl-6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TO 5 REPLACE NON-STANDARD EXISTING SIGN IN CROSSWALK AT OAK 1 SF $500.00 $500 AND EMPEROR EAST (NORTH LEG) 6 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALK AT OAK AND EMPEROR AT EAST AND 774 SF $4.25 $3,2901 WEST LEG AND NORTH LEGS, OAK AND LEMON 1 Total of Section $30,6021 Page 1 of 4 I No. I Item Description I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amount ITemple City High School INSTALL POST MOUNTED SOLAR PED ACTUATED LIGHTS AND XWALK AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON LEMON AVENUE AT TRELAWNEY AVENUE. (LED LIT ASSEMBLY B WITH 1 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 DOWNWARD FACING ARROW AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS — R62E(CA) FOR EB AND WB DIRECTIONS) — Met warrants for installation per Chapter 4N.02 OF THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) 2 INSTALL ADA RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AT XWALK AT 3 EA $2,900.00 $8,7001 LEMON AND TRELAWNEYAVE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES INSTALL ASSEMBLY C (SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS) ON LEMON 3 2 EA $250.00 $5001 APPROACHING SCHOOL FOR EB AND WB TRAFFIC INSTALL ASSEMBLY C (SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS) ON TEMPLE CITY 4 BOULEVARD BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND LEMON AVENUE FOR 2 EA $250.00 $500 NB AND SB TRAFFIC YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALK AT LEMON AND TEMPLE CITY BLVD, EL 5 CAMINO REAL AND TEMPLE CITY BLVD AND SL OF LEMON AND 1560 SF $4.25 $6,630 TRELAW N EY Total of Section $36,3301 I No. I Item Description 1 Qty 1 Unit 1 Unit Price I Total Amountl (Emperor Elementary School 1 1 1635 SF $4.25 $6,949 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT EMPEROR AND ROSEMEAD BLVD PROVIDE 1 (R1-6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TO 2 1 EA $500.00 $5001 REPLACE NON -STANDARD EXISTING SIGN INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON EMPEROR 150' FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD ON 3 THE SOUTH SIDE AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 100' SOUTH OF 1360 LF $41.00 $55,760 ROSEMEAD BLVD ON THE WESTSIDE Total of Secion $63,2091 No. I Item Description 1 Qty 1 Unit I Unit Price I Total Amountl First Lutheran School 1 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT NOEL AND BROADWAY (NORTH 1 640 SF $4.25 $2,7201 LEG AND EAST LEG) 2 ADA COMPLIANT RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES FOR EXISTING 2 EA $2,900.00 $5,8001 CROSSWALK AT NOEL AND BROADWAY EAST LEG INSTALL SOLAR LED FLASHING SCHOOL XING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY B) 3 WITH DOWNWARD FACING ARROW AT UNPROTECTED CROSSWALK 1 EA $12,500.00 $12,500 AT NOEL AND BROADWAY WITH HIGHLY REFLECTIVE RAISED RPMS ALONG CROSSWALK Total of Section $21,0201 Page 2 of 4 I No. I Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total Amount) I La Rosa Elementary School YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT ALESANDRO AND LA ROSA (NL AND SL), ALESANDRO AT PENTLAND (NL AND WL), FRATUS AND LA 1980 SF $4.25 $8,415 1 ROSA (EL), FRATUS AND KENNERLY (EL) AND PENTLAND AND FRATUS (SL) ADA COMPLIANT RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES FOR EXISTING CROSSWALKS AT ALESANDRO AT PENTLAND (NWC), AT FRATUS AND 5 EA $2,900.00 $14,500 2 KENNERLY (NEC AND SEC) AND FRATUS AND PENTLAND (SWC ANS SEC) INSTALL SCHOOL CROSSING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY B WITH DOWNWARD 3 FACING ARROW) AT UNPROTECTED CROSSWALK AT LA ROSA AND 2 EA $400.00 $800 ALESANDRO (WL) WITH HIGHLY REFLECTIVE RAISED YELLOW RPMS ALONG EXISTING CROSSWALK PROVIDE 1 (RI -6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TO 4 REPLACE NON-STANDARD EXISTING SIGN IN CROSSWALK AT LA ROSA 1 EA $500.00 $500 AND ALESANDRO(NORTH LEG) INSTALL ASSEMBLY C (SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS) ON LA ROSA 5 APPROACHING SCHOOL FOR EB AND WBTRAFFIC AND ON PENTLAND 4 EA $250.00 $1,000 ST BETWEEN ALESANDRO AND FRATUS INSTALL 5' ON N SS TWEEN OOL ND 6PENINIATA AVE, ONLKFRATUS ONN ASST IDES FROM LAHROSAATO 445 LF $41.00 $18,245 I ND Total of Section $43,4601 No. I Item Description I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amountl Cloverl f Elementary School I YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT CLOVERLY AND BROADWAY, 1 CLOVERLY AT DAINES (WL) AND CLOVERLY AT OLIVE AND NL OF 2780 SF $4.25 $11,815 I BLACKLEY AND CLOVERLY INSTALL SOLAR LED SCHOOL SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED FEEDBACK 2 SIGNS ALONG BROADWAY APPROACHING SCHOOL FOR EB AND WB 2 EA $11,000.00 $22,000 DIRECTIONS 3 STRIPE EXISTING UNPROTECTED CROSSWALK AT CLOVERLY AND 270 SF $4.25 $1,148 BLACKLEY YELLOW ZEBRA INSTALL SCHOOL CROSSING (ASSEMBLY B) WITH DOWNWARD 2 EA $500.00 $1,000 4 FACING ARROW AT CLOVERLY AND BLACKELY INSTALL SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS (ASSEMBLY C) ON CLOVERLY 1 EA $400.00 $400 5 FOR NB DIR WITH SLOW SCHOOL LEGENDS INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON CLOVERLY BETWEEN OLIVE AND BLACKLEY 470 LF $41.00 $19,270 6 ON EAST SIDE 7 ADD ADA RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AT NEC OF CLOVERLY 1 EA $2,900.00 $2,900 AND BLACKLEY Total of Section $58,5331, Page 3 of 4 I No. I Item Description IClemin-on Elementary School I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amount 1 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT DALEVIEW AND FREER (WL AND SL), DALEVIEW AND ARROWOOD (WL), DALEVIEW AND GRAND (NL) 2 INSTALL SCHOOL AHEAD (ASSEMBLY D) ON DALEVIEW FOR NB DIRECTION AND ON FREER ST FOR EB AND WB DIRECTIONS 3 INSTALL STOP AND STOP BAR FOR WL AT DALEVIEW AND ARROWOOD 1 4 INSTALL SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 25 (ASSEMBLY C) ON DALEVIEW FOR BOTH NB AND SB DIRECTIONS INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF DALEVIEW BETWEEN GRAND 5 AND FREER, ON THE WEST SIDE OF DALEVIEW BETWEEN SCHOOL AND ARROWOOD AND ARROWOOD TO GRAND AVENUE. I No. I Item Description ILongley Way Elementary School INSTALL POST MOUNTED SOLAR PED ACTUATED LIGHTS AND XWALK AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON LIVE OAK 1 AND WARREN (LED LIT ASSEMBLY B WITH DOWNWARD FACING ARROW AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS — R62E(CA) FOR EB AND WB DIRECTIONS) — Met warrants for installation per Chapter 4L.02 OF THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) 2 INSTALL ADA RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES FOR SOUTHERN EDGE OF CROSSWALK AT LIVE OAK AND WARREN I Page 4 of 4 1160 SF $4.25 $4,930 3 EA $250.00 $750 42 SF $3.00 $1261 2 EA $250.00 $500111 940 LF $41.00 $38,5401 Total of Section $44,8461 I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amount) 1 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 1 EA $2,900.00 $2,900 Total of Section $22,9001 Remits, Bonds, Licenses & Insurance $8,0001 (Public Convenience & Safety $5,0001 ISub-total of Construction $397,6761 110 Percent Contigency 1 $39,7681 ITotal Construction $437,4441 ITOTAL I $437,4441 n 4 co cli cli aN F - c0 o c Z- 0 yj U Yy Y oa U d A n C M M M M O N N N N m e c c c O U n 4 co cli cli aN F - c0 o c Z- 0 yj U Yy Y oa U Ori�cmo mv� Ym )� i Q�ci� - a E - c EmmN rna� o g2E 0 ° n UN 1p N Oa � N NF E - vwwE� Eo n ;c3 3-n _p OymN — � U NFiti NF- Y li in ) jv 7i Nei �'y0 J ppn aUY ZO N U J NFYm �.tiE-O�cY J4J Yy'CoZ Z 1pKQhm F - a o v m� €E tom '°n`amN000 yy -a N o E3 y�e'i, � 5 v¢ E N d m v m 0 9 E u �@ a n v - _ E22 Z N Y'n Z > U v u N F [J md' 3 5 x @1 °' v za mOY Nva 00 W� Js pci p, LL�m Wv yU(�9LLo <ZO amp E im my - Ori�cmo mv� Ym )� i Q�ci� - a E - c E � vwwE� Eo n ;c3 3-n _p OymN — ��W li in vJQi mHo `C QOI�L�QVIQ=a ppn aUY ZO cm l C N r r.+ O O 3 o 1 r o� ° �''u U i I O N N ° o :a a fn o R N � c /te VJ vII- N OL U - 0 L W r a r N C t yTu 0 O o V N - LL Z 0] a O • ■ ■ ■ N Q� O Z O U U'^) I O O a N ^ O m o rli U LL C O C o O C e �i U 6 O N C N O 3 a) U o O U` 3 U� m L - O lV r a--1 ° U) sunsetbk q 1 d y� - U 9� ^' w G � � N m m � m � a <1 a C U P 0 e O O ;J 01 Pa i�ad � e z ffi.. i Y y 90 O W itta Ave o PO i a O wl pva Monte i par�hiar C O F f.. ro O il N d vI I W c �N/ cr. y n Q N �o� WE o0 .o �.--_ Go W� U o - _F O O d N a w �- � m o m o SemPtie��try �o U O CO N U � � o O k7 uanr y CL N CO E� 0 U •'^b 4afuij� � N O O a) �r N N �.--_ Go Y � SemPtie��try 8 O O a) �r N o yo O U O O Q u a Lu n o a v rn L Ep2d m q NO O 6 p U N L N O 00 ® G O N N N UO CD a Q, o�w� o s O «n m Y w w E m c w `w N N Q LU LL O - u W v cc: CL m R V W g4_ 'oo I W rd ++ - F U gig I J W 0] Q z Q N F- N W W� t \ rz :1 V i Cleminson Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT CLEMINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K thru 6" Grade) 399 Students ------------- 2,758 ADT' Ap N - Existing Safe Route to School • • - All -Way Stop Control -Two-Way Stop Control - Signal 0 Accidents Posted 25 mph/ 85? speed 33 m,ah �, j �{ Approx. 40% of students walk ? j1, to/from school using SRTS Ui5rh % is 3� mph routes ith 624 A1JT nm - •i u �A---=_Posted30mph,'yi X1;9 9 &WDTW5`h % speed is 35', e $nph 7 ? 4�)r� 06 feet' 1.66 m Existing Conditions: Freer Street: Farago • Posted speed of 25 mph at Freer St and Daleview Ave to McClintock • 85th Percentile speed is higherthan posted speed at 33 mph Ave on Freer St • 2,758 ADT on Freer St • 1 lane each direction • Parking permitted on both sides • Residential land use Daleview Avenue: Freer • Fronting school site Street to Grand Ave • Heavy street parking on both sides • Parents double park to pickup students • No posted speed limit • No existing school signage • No sidewalks on east side or south of school between school grounds and Grand Avenue • Parents and students are walking in street around parked cars • Principal indicated Daleview to Grand heaviest travel path for parents and students • ADT on Daleview 624 • Residential Land Use Grand Avenue: • Posted 30 mph McClintock to Santa • ADT of 1,949 East of Daleview Anita Ave • No sidewalks on either side • Most traveled route to Cleminson EI • Parking allowed on both sides • Residential land use 3 Year Accident Summary Near Cleminson Elementary School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 1. Daleview/Grand 60'N 08/26/08 25:00 Tu Sideswipe PDO 2. Grand/McClintock 1 09/09/08 13:15 Tu Head -On PDO Factor SB Veh hit parked Veh WB Veh hit EB Veh PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT CLEMINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL f., AHEAD:h. 4V Install SW24-3(CA) For N SCSC Q SPEED $R4-1(CA) LIMIT 25 N E4 IIEH M1fl[ Pfl'u1 rl Install SR4-1(CA) For NB And SB Directions On Daleview Ave DirectionsEB And WB It—IM , k5„•.,�,pk Freer St UVE 1 Cleminison El - Y+ Lr1 9 ® Install SW24-3(CA) For NB Direction On Daleview Ave M• Install STOP and stop bar for EB traffic at Arrowood at Daleview Install Yellow Crosswalks With Diagonal Or Zebra Striping at Existing Stop Controlled Intersections • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' Install 5' Wide Sidewalks Along Daleview Avenue With ADA Ramps At Intersections PHOTO EXHIBIT CLEMINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Sidewalks on the east and west sides of the street are missing double park to pick up their children. Looking south on Daleview Avenue north of Grand Avenue. School children and parents are exposed to motor traffic as they walk on the road due to a lack of sidewalks. Looking north at intersection of Daleview Avenue and Arrowood Street. The intersection lacks crosswalk striping and Stop Legend and Stop Bar. Looking north on Daleview Avenue north of Grand Avenue. The street lacks proper CAMUTCD signs including 25 MPH School Speed Limit and School Ahead Signs. Looking west at intersection of Grand Avenue and Daleview Avenue. The intersection lack$ crosswalk striping. Cloverly Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (4t" thru 6th Grade) 447 Students Wedgle`r'ood St •'• 3y - Existing Safe Route to School - All -Way Stop Control - Two -Way Stop Control - Signal - Accidents ro wyewoad st • Posted 35 mph -25 -goa"" St mph at school N 5,597 ADT • s A�-'•-� - ? Existing Posted School m - 25 mph on Broady as&ne St_ v, NN • forEB and WB - 0 a o 4* r Unprotected Malk (WL) with 'Cl No Signage at \ Malk at (Clove rly/Blackley) Existing Conditions Nad;nA $t - 6-C ►+� ,, Existing Schoo(and Bicycle Signs Nonconforming to CAMUTCD for NB Dir f4 T, "oOarld Of Blackley St m 1 m 3 Broadway: Temple City • Considered a Secondary Arterial Blvd to Cleverly • 1 lane each direction • Residential land use • No Left turns posted for WB traffic along Broadway Cleverly: Broadway to • 1 lane each direction Blackley • Street parking on both sides • Residential Land Use • No posted speed limit • No Sidewalks • School parking and drop off on Cleverly 3 Year Accident Summary Near Cleverly School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. 1 03/07/10 14:35 Su Head -On [NJ EB LT Veh hit WB Broadway/Alessandro Thru Veh 2. Broadway/Temple 1 06/21/09 20:52 Su Rearend PDO EB Veh hit EB Veh City Blvd Speed 3 Year Accident Summary Cont Near Cloverly School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 3. Cloverly/Broadway 170'S 10/08/09 14:55 Th Veh/Bike [NJ EB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Bike (12 yrs) 4. Broadway/Cl overly 13'E 01/31/08 23:10 Th Broadside PDO EB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Veh 5. Cloverly/Daines 60'S 06/03/08 15:00 Tu Hit Object PDO SB Thru Veh hit 0 bj PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Install SR4-1 (CA) Assembly C with AT LED Speed Feedback Signs along CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Broadway approaching School for EB and WB Directions Install S' Sidewalk along Cloverly between Olive and Blackley Install SR4-1(CA) Assembly C -on Cloverly approaching School for NB Direction Install ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes at NEC of Cloverly and Blackley • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelinesfrom CAMUTCD Chapter 7 " Traffic Control for School Areas" PHOTO EXHIBIT CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Broadway Avenue looking west approaching Cloverly Avenue. Location requires Speed Feedback sign due to motorists' excessive � - _ ®§i0T/3992.911r48 Broadway Avenue and Cloverly Avenue intersection looking southeast. The intersection lacks proper striping. Zebra striping is proposed for the crosswalks. 40 MfUTIM112 99IN Cloverly Avenue north of Blackley Street looking south. Sidewalks Blackley Street and Cloverly Avenue intersection. This unprotected are lacking on the west side of the street causing hazardous crosswalk lacks yellow striping and proper signage. Cloverly Avenue north of Olive Street looking north on east side approaching school. Many of the signs are faded and aging in need of replacement. There is no posted speed limit. Cloverly Avenue north of Olive Street looking north on east side approaching school. Many of the signs are faded and aging in need of replacement. Emperor Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (4th thru 6th Grade) 447 Students x m 0 p edgewoad St lil Existing Safe Route to School • • • •� - All -Way Stop Control . - Two -Way Stop Control Signal Accidents ? • 1 � VJed9ewoacl St 'i I Posted 35 mph — 25 •'BaV'st-mphatschool', • 5,597 ADT 1'._�to Y d • Existing Posted School ro 25 mph on Broadwaay jne 5t. `r,. fdrrEB and WB -- U 3 V? t\ Existing Conditions Broadway: Temple City %K fit Blvd to Cloverly 0 •1);�4•"' •, .Ndd9[\E. • Residential land use ems+ s ••••��. y •'• 71 � No Left turns posted for WB traffic along Broadway i i • �_•-•�I • •,� Existing School and • XandOr 14:35 Su Head -On C J �• i3 Bicycle Signs • Q- 2. Broadway/Temple 1 Nonconforming CAMUTCD for NB Dir No Sidewalks St - Unprotected Speed # Buckley *= u N XWalk(WL)with No Signage at WD @ w XWalk at w I (Clove rly/Blackley) °s Existing Conditions Broadway: Temple City • Considered a Secondary Arterial Blvd to Cloverly 0 1 lane each direction • Residential land use Date • No Left turns posted for WB traffic along Broadway Cloverly: Broadway to • 1 lane each direction Blackley • Street parking on both sides 14:35 Su Head -On • Residential Land Use • No posted speed limit 2. Broadway/Temple 1 • No Sidewalks PDO EB Veh hit EB Veh • School parking and drop off on Cloverly 3 Year Accident Summary Near Cloverly School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. 1 03/07/10 14:35 Su Head -On INJ EB LT Veh hit WB Broadway/Alessandro Thru Veh 2. Broadway/Temple 1 06/21/09 20:52 Su Rearend PDO EB Veh hit EB Veh City Blvd Speed 3 Year Accident Summary Cont. Near Cloverly School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 3. Cloverly/Broadway 170'S 10/08/09 14:55 Th Veh/Bike INJ EB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Bike (12 yrs) 4. Broadway/Cloverly 13'E 01/31/08 23:10 Th Broadside PDO EB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Veh 5. Cloverly/Daines 60'S 06/03/08 15:00 To Hit Object PDO SB Thru Veh hit 0 bj PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Install SR4-1(CA) Assembly C with AT LED Speed Feedback Signs along CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Broadway approaching School for EB and WB Directions Install 5' Sidewalk along Cloverly between Olive and Blackley Assembly -on Cloverly approaching School for NB Direction Install ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes at NEC of Cloverly and Blackley • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 'Traffic Control for School Areas' PHOTO EXHIBIT CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Broadway Avenue looking west approaching Cloverly Avenue. Location requires Speed Feedback sign due to motorists' excessive ®6f®U%092 96=4!{ Broadway Avenue and Cl overly Avenue intersection looking southeast. The intersection lacks proper striping. Zebra striping is Cloverly Avenue north of Blackley Street looking south. Sidewalks are lacking on the west side of the street causing hazardous Blackley Street and Cloverly Avenue intersection. This unprotected crosswalk lacks yellow striping and proper signage. Cloverly Avenue north of Olive Street looking north on east side approaching school. Many of the signs are faded and aging in need of replacement. There is no posted speed limit. Cloverly Avenue north of Olive Street looking north an east side approaching school. Many of the signs are faded and aging in need of replacement. First Lutheran School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL Existing Safe Route to School • • • - All -Way Stop Control . - Two -Way Stop Control Signal Accidents Broadway 10,242 AN -g I m _? A.nrf,n Ramal Rri Existing Conditions: 35 mph 50 feet 1 Do m Broadway: Noel to • 2 lanes each direction Encinita Ave • Residential land use • Fast Moving Traffic on Broadway • Sidewalks on both sides 3 Year Accident Summary Near First Lutheran School Location Dist. Date Time Day I! Severity Type 1. Broadway/Encinita 1 01/04/09 Tunas Dr Su Sideswipe PDO 2. Broadway/Encinita 1 02/02/09 15:50 M Broadside INJ 3. Broadway/Loma 10'W 03/17/09 07:35 Tu Backing PDO 4. Broadway/Sultana 19'E 02/21/09 08:00 Sa Sideswipe PDO CL AN11-1 10:55 We Rearend PDO Speed N Unprotected NS 08:05 Existing Advance School Broadside INJ School XWalk Signage — both directions 0 ,C) 7. Broadway/Encinita (EW) with SLOW SCHOOL XING pavement legends {'§� Tu > INJ Broadway 10,242 AN -g I m _? A.nrf,n Ramal Rri Existing Conditions: 35 mph 50 feet 1 Do m Broadway: Noel to • 2 lanes each direction Encinita Ave • Residential land use • Fast Moving Traffic on Broadway • Sidewalks on both sides 3 Year Accident Summary Near First Lutheran School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 1. Broadway/Encinita 1 01/04/09 20:45 Su Sideswipe PDO 2. Broadway/Encinita 1 02/02/09 15:50 M Broadside INJ 3. Broadway/Loma 10'W 03/17/09 07:35 Tu Backing PDO 4. Broadway/Sultana 19'E 02/21/09 08:00 Sa Sideswipe PDO 5. Broadway/Sultana 1 07/23/08 10:55 We Rearend PDO Speed 6. Broadway/Sultana 1 10/06/08 08:05 M Broadside INJ Veh/Bike 7. Broadway/Encinita 1 10/23/07 08:30 Tu Veh/Ped INJ 8. Broadway/Encinita 1 12/13/07 19:10 Th Broadside INJ Factor WB Left hit EB Thru Veh NB Thru Veh hit WB Thru Veh WB Backing hit parked WB Veh WB Parking Veh hit another parked Veh WB Thru Veh hit WB Thru Veh SB Right turn Veh hit WE Bike EB LT Veh hit NB Ped in Xwall< NB Thru Veh hit EB Thru Veh Factor EB Thru Veh hit EB LFT Veh NB RT Veh hit WB Thru Veh SB RT Veh hit EB Thru Veh X Install Solar LED Flashing Assembly B for unprotected Xwalk in East Leg at Broadway and Noel with Yellow Zebra Striped Paintfor North and East legs with Reflective Raised RPM's for Xwalk in rj East leg. Includes ADA Ramps with Truncated loy Domes for NWC, NEC and SEC. Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 9. Broadway/Noel 8'W 04/21/07 12:29 Sa Rearend PDO Speed 10. 1 10/18/07 16:20 Th Wrong IN1 Broadway/Sultana Side 11. 1 12/19/07 15:00 W Wrong INJ Broadway/Sultana Side PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL Factor EB Thru Veh hit EB LFT Veh NB RT Veh hit WB Thru Veh SB RT Veh hit EB Thru Veh X Install Solar LED Flashing Assembly B for unprotected Xwalk in East Leg at Broadway and Noel with Yellow Zebra Striped Paintfor North and East legs with Reflective Raised RPM's for Xwalk in rj East leg. Includes ADA Ramps with Truncated loy Domes for NWC, NEC and SEC. P: T'(ij'ft?flet ail1. i'i Ih.- A -TE --� --� OE ,I RURAL �R} '.II r.i .�, ;. tli .., �,i nr f�i r to r,�•�,1 vLi •- L.I URBAN IUI Fl,sahmq Yellow Beacon dt Sciloul Ciusbklgv SATISFIED YES NO I (Ail Parts Milst Be. Satistwdl) PatcA -I F.EC •E4 lair AND Part (3 5 •._'"ISREC EW IIS AND Part C ., r- .�.� l._n•, .; -t, n IAi�r ., I:.,...i. .:, .`ISFIECEf t C- 1k(!'!!� to)(yldit IfI it `<;%/ill 1 (lt,; i;{`t-•}; T"C�{L� 4!r'r �t I`,' in i r r.;r1LC1,11rt(t"ion {- C(43t,4, ��-y-4tti��t ..��>3t;�ir, (It(�t•r', Ia:ED) tell *:l:ll]ka91:91 LUTHERAN SCHOOL Broadway Avenue east of Noel Drive looking west on north side of Broadway Avenue west of Noel Drive looking east on north side of street. Due to fast moving traffic on Broadway Avenue, this site is street. This street experiences heavy traffic volumes which poses a very prone to accidents. safety risk to students walking from First Lutheran School. Intersection of Broadway Avenue and Noel Drive looking east. The crosswalks lack zebra striping and are not adequately visible for crossing traffic. 09l6Ty�9$91[13 Broadway Avenue east of Noel Drive looking west. The intersection will benefit from a flashing beacon to warn approaching traffic at this unprotected crosswalk. La Rosa Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT LA ROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Kthru3RD Grade) 582 Students Existing Adva nce Ped Xing Sign with SLOW SCHOOL XING on La Rosa for EB Existing Conditions: La Rosa: Allesandro to Fratus Pentland: Allesandro to Fratus Allesandro: La Rosa to Pentland - Existing Safe Route to School • • • - All -Way Stop Control -Two-Way Stop Control - Signal - Accidents _ • Posted 25 mph/ 35`h speed 34 mph ..-ha- '�41 ------y* Po= _= •.-•-• Existing Advance Ped Xing Sign with SLOW SCHOOL RING on 1a�Rpsa for WB -,�• !� - '•� 'i 'i Unprotected - 1, 500ADT fel School XWalk(WL) 85`h %32 mph4 •' No Signage at XWalk (La Rosa/Allesandro S 256, feet o M • 85`h Percentile speed is high at 32 mph in front of school • 1 lane each direction • Heavy Parking on South Side, limited to 10 min on north side • Residential land use • During school pick up parked cars obscure xwalk i With parking street is very narrow • Bus also parks on La Rosa to pick up students • 86h Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school • Parents stack along Pentland to pick up kids in valet line • Street parking on both sides • Residential Land Use • No posted speed limit • No posted speed • Heavy vehicle traffic from parents waiting to pick up kids • Residential parking allowed on east side • 3 min parking zone on west side 0 Smaller buses wait for kids Portable Street Crossing�5ign (Non- Conforma6ce to CA MUTCD) Existing Conditions: La Rosa: Allesandro to Fratus Pentland: Allesandro to Fratus Allesandro: La Rosa to Pentland - Existing Safe Route to School • • • - All -Way Stop Control -Two-Way Stop Control - Signal - Accidents _ • Posted 25 mph/ 35`h speed 34 mph ..-ha- '�41 ------y* Po= _= •.-•-• Existing Advance Ped Xing Sign with SLOW SCHOOL RING on 1a�Rpsa for WB -,�• !� - '•� 'i 'i Unprotected - 1, 500ADT fel School XWalk(WL) 85`h %32 mph4 •' No Signage at XWalk (La Rosa/Allesandro S 256, feet o M • 85`h Percentile speed is high at 32 mph in front of school • 1 lane each direction • Heavy Parking on South Side, limited to 10 min on north side • Residential land use • During school pick up parked cars obscure xwalk i With parking street is very narrow • Bus also parks on La Rosa to pick up students • 86h Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school • Parents stack along Pentland to pick up kids in valet line • Street parking on both sides • Residential Land Use • No posted speed limit • No posted speed • Heavy vehicle traffic from parents waiting to pick up kids • Residential parking allowed on east side • 3 min parking zone on west side 0 Smaller buses wait for kids 3 Year Accident Summary Near La Rosa Elementary School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Pentland/Encinita 69'E 10/24/09 23:25 Sa Hit Obj INJ EB Left Turn hit Obi 2. Pentland/Fratus 196' 04/16/09 08:20 Th Sideswipe PDO EB Thru Veh Hit EB E Thru Veh 3. Pentland/Fratus 1 08/31/08 20:55 Su Rearend PDO WBThru Veh Hit Speed Parked WB Veh 4. Pentland/Encinita 12'E 03/19/08 21:10 We Sideswipe PDO WB RT Veh hit WB Veh SEH40L SPEED LIMIT 25 „sir„y PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT ) approaching Allesandro LA ROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Install 5' Sidewalk along Fratus and Pentland Diagonal Or Zebra Striping at Existing Stop/Signal Controlled Intersections Install SR4-1(CA) Assembly C -on La Rosa approaching Allesandro for WB and at Rio Hondo for EB traffic SPEED SR&I(CA)' U11IT v o Install SR4-1 (CA) Assembly C -on wrHCN Pentland for both c>IrmRra hRE PRESENT approaches to the school - Install ADA Compliant Ramps with Truncated Domes at Alesandro at Pentland (NWC), Fratus at Kennerly (NEC and SEC) and Fratus and Pentland (SWC and SEC) • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7'Traffic Control for School Areas' Assembly B Provide 1111-6 sign to replace non conforming sign SCHOOL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SPEED AT ) LIMIT 25 LA ROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL _ Install 5' Sidewalk along Fratus and Pentland Install SR4-1(CA) Install Yellow Crosswalks With Diagonal Or Zebra Striping at Existing Stop/Signal Controlled Intersections Assembly C -on LaRosa approaching Allesandro'SCHOL ATE for WB and at Rio Hondo _ _ LAW for EB traffic SPEED SR41(CA) LIMIT 0 InstaIISR4-1(CA) Assembly 5 - ` -on Pentland for both cwwxrr+ 1bE XRFB[Ni _ XIINIX I approaches to the school RMW) Install ADA Compliant Ramps with Truncated Domes at Alesandro at Pentland (NWC), Fratus at Kennerly (NEC and SEC) and Fratus and Pentland (SWC and SEC) All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' Assembly B Provide 1111-6 sign to replace non conforming sign Longden Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT LONGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K thru 6th Grade) 991 Students t ♦ I'r`- ` r ,r Xing Guard L r1 T W----- Posted 25 W1 .7,141 ADT speed 371 •t - _ ...a ate, Existing Conditions: Longden Ave: Temple City Blvd to Oak Ave Oak Ave: Longden to Garibaldi Ave Primrose: Longden to Garibaldi Existing Safe Route to School a a a - All -Way Stop Control • Two -Way Stop Control - Signal - Accidents 85th - =LADY GO :7•—_�l� 1-- iI 1 ,11 ,1 Xing Guard -5N1 a 85`h Percentile speed is high at 37 mph near the school a 7,141 ADT on Longden Ave a 1 lane each direction a Parking permitted on north side a 1 school sign for WB dir a Residential land use a During school pick up EB dir is blocked by parents a Very narrow a Heavy pedestrian usage on south side at school pick up a 85`h Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school a Posted 30 mph a Street parking on both sides a Parents and students are walking in street around parked cars a Residential Land Use a No posted speed a Heavy vehicle traffic a No sidewalks on either side a Parents pick up kids on Wendon Street use Primrose as loop a Residential parking allowed on both sides makes narrow streets 0 Residential land use .I rD N n s a a� WGOP - -- ii 11 - w Y i�,642 ADTIl ' ' II i a 85`h Percentile speed is high at 37 mph near the school a 7,141 ADT on Longden Ave a 1 lane each direction a Parking permitted on north side a 1 school sign for WB dir a Residential land use a During school pick up EB dir is blocked by parents a Very narrow a Heavy pedestrian usage on south side at school pick up a 85`h Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school a Posted 30 mph a Street parking on both sides a Parents and students are walking in street around parked cars a Residential Land Use a No posted speed a Heavy vehicle traffic a No sidewalks on either side a Parents pick up kids on Wendon Street use Primrose as loop a Residential parking allowed on both sides makes narrow streets 0 Residential land use 3 Year Accident Summary Near Longden Eleme itary School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Longden/Oak 292' 3/4/10 14:37 Th Veh/Ped INJ WB Veh hit NB ped E (8 yrs old) 2. Oak/Longden 342' 2/26/10 18:22 Fr Sideswipe PDO SB thru Veh hit SB l S thru Veh 3. Garibaldi/Oak 1 11/6/09 07:30 Fr Veh/Bike PDO EB RT Veh hit NB Bike 4. Longden/Temple 1 10/29/09 11:55 Th Speed PDO EB Thru Veh hit EB City Blvd (TCB) Rearend Thru Veh 5. TCB/Longden 1 8/2/09 15:10 Su Broadside PDO WB Thru Veh hit NB Thru Veh 6. TCB/Longden 1 8/23/09 19:34 Su Broadside INJ WB Thru Veh hit NB l Thru Veh 7. Longden/Oak 1 3/26/08 09:00 We Sideswipe PDO EB Thru Veh hit EB , thru Veh 8. Longden/Primrose 242' 2/22/08 08:20 Fr Veh/Ped INJ WB Thru Veh hit Ped W crossing SB (12 yrs old) 9. Longden/Primrose 1 5/13/08 18:30 Tu Speed PDO EB Thru Veh hit EB Rearend Thru Veh 10. 108' 6/16/08 15:20 Mo Broadside PDO NB Thru Veh hit WB Longden/Primrose W thru Veh 11. Longden/TCB 45'W 2/6/08 22:40 We Sideswipe PDO EB thru Veh hit WB Thru Veh 12. 1 1/15/08 12:15 Tu Veh/Ped INJ SB Veh hit EB Ped Primrose/Garibaldi (15 yrs old) 13. 500' 6/21/08 00:52 Sa Hit Obj PDO NB Veh hit parked Primrose/Longden S SB) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT LONGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5W24-3(CA) RHEA Install SW24-3(CA) Assembly D For EB and WB Directions On Longden Ave SW24-1(CA) SCHOOL Install SW24-1(CA) Assembly A For NB and SB Directions On Primrose Ave Install ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes on NWC and SWC of Crosswalk at Wendon and Primrose • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' Assembly C 25 mph Flashing Beacon On Longden Ave for EB and WB 121DIEel y:1711:1III Ate] PLe19V ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Longden Avenue east of Oak Avenue looking east. Cars block the Longden Avenue east of Oak Avenue looking west. The roadway eastbound direction of Longden Avenue as school children are let here is very narrow. There is heavy pedestrian usage on the south out from school. Primrose Avenue at Flaherty Street looking north. There are no sidewalks on either side of the street and the corner requires an ADA ramp to improve accessibility. Primrose Avenue at Wendon Street looking west. Parents pick up kids on Wendon Street and use Primrose Avenue as loop. Residential parking on both sides makes the street narrow. Longlev Wav Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT LONGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K thru 6th Grade) 991 Students t ----- --- Olema St I Xing Guard i i9- ly' I I J � 9 � [Avg II N Existing Conditions: Longden Ave: Temple City Blvd to Oak Ave Oak Ave: Longden to Garibaldi Ave Primrose: Longden to Garibaldi V� -- Posted 25 l5 �y 7,141 ADT speed 371 Existing Safe Route to School • • • '� - All -Way Stop Control - Two -Way Stop Control Signal Accidents &h/ 85,tn =S 10 j4 Xing Guard �' \N' k� o { i' N t•� (1, N t l Amf�tAflrCni • 85th Percentile speed is high at 37 mph near the school • 7,141 ADT on Longden Ave • 1 lane each direction • Parking permitted on north side • 1 school sign for WB dig • Residential land use • During school pick up EB dir is blocked by parents • Very narrow • Heavy pedestrian usage on south side at school pick up • 85" Percentile speed is high at 34 mph nearthe school • Posted 30 mph • Street parking on both sides • Parents and students are walking in street around parked cars • Residential Land Use • No posted speed • Heavy vehicle traffic • No sidewalks on either side • Parents pick up kids on Wendon Street use Primrose as loop • Residential parking allowed on both sides makes narrow streets • Residential land use 3 Year Accident Summary Near Longden Eleme ttary School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Longden/Oak 292' 3/4/10 14:37 Th Veh/Ped INJ WB Veh hit NB ped E (8 yrs old) 2. Oak/Longden 342' 2/26/10 18:22 Fr Sideswipe PDO SB thru Veh hit SB l S thru Veh 3. Garibaldi/Oak 1 11/6/09 07:30 Fr Veh/Bike PDO EB RT Veh hit NB Bike 4. Longden/Temple 1 10/29/09 11:55 Th Speed PDO EB Thru Veh hit EB City Blvd (TCB) Rearend Thru Veh S. TCB/Longden 1 8/2/09 15:10 Su Broadside PDO WB Thru Veh hit NB Thru Veh 6. TCB/Longden I 8/23/09 19:34 Su Broadside INJ WB Thru Veh hit NB Thru Veh 7. Longden/Oak 1 3/26/08 09:00 We Sideswipe PDO EB Thru Veh hit EB 1 thru Veh 8. Longden/Primrose 242' 2/22/08 08:20 Fr Veh/Ped INJ WB Thru Veh hit Ped W crossing SB (12 yrs old) 9. Longden/Primrose 1 5/13/08 18:30 Tu Speed PDO EB Thru Veh hit EB Rearend Thru Veh 10. 108' 6/16/08 15:20 Mo Broadside PDO NB Thru Veh hit WB Longden/Primrose W thru Veh 11. Longden/TCB 45'W 2/6/08 22:40 We Sideswipe PDO EB thru Veh hit WB Thru Veh 12. I 1/15/08 12:15 Tu Veh/Ped INJ SB Veh hit EB Ped Primrose/Garibaldi (15 yrs old) 13. 500' 6/21/08 00:52 Sa Hit Obj PDO NB Veh hit parked Primrose/Longden S SB) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT LONGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5W24-3(CA) AHEAD SW24-1(CA) SCHOOL Install SW24-1(CA) AssemblyA For NB and SB Directions On Primrose Ave Install ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes on NWC and SWC of Crosswalk at Wendon and Primrose • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' Assembly C 25 mph Flashing Beacon On Longden Ave for ES and WB FaWWil (:11.MillI 7L[A 11 AL] ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Longden Avenue east of Oak Avenue looking east. Camblockthe Longden Avenue east of Oak Avenue looking west. The roadway eastbound direction of Longden Avenue as school children are let here is very narrow. There is heavy pedestrian usage on the south out from school. Primrose Avenue at Flaherty Street looking north. There are no sidewalks on either side of the street and the corner requires an ADA ramp to improve accessibility. Primrose Avenue at Wendon Street looking west. Parents pick up kids on Wendon Street and use Primrose Avenue as loop. Residential parking on both sides makes the street narrow. Oak Intermediate School Existing Safe Route to School • • ®' EXISTING CONDITIONS AT OAK - All -Way Stop Control INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL (7th Thru 8th Grade) - Two -Way Stop Control 951 Students - signal - Accidents '? �raen • �Camin� y • Unprotected EW Xwalk (SL) No •, Existing Signage at Xwalk (ped Vehicles wait on Caminoi_ pA_ • a count conducted) Real — both sides to wait . 0 • • • s E to pick up students .• • c m • • • E m no �� d • N c •' O of • a m School EW Xwalk— heavily used — Crossing guard in afternoon •••�••• ,C qe(O a s� m N M Existing Conditions Ave Emperor Ave provides access to Temple City High School Baseball/Soccer ect. fields. Parents/Students park and or walk in to watch the games after school hours — park at Oak School 25D fee Oak Avenue: EI Camino • 85th Percentile speed is high at 33 mph near the school Real to Lemon Avenue a Posted 25 mph approaching school • Posted 30 mph for SB traffic S/0 Emperor • 1,767 ADT on Oak Ave • 1 lane each direction • Parking permitted on both side south of Emperor • No existing Ped Xing Signs at Unprotected Xwalk • Cars are picking up speed traveling NB as they cross Camino Real • Residential land use • No sidewalks north of EI Camino Real CAMUTCD Guidelines for In -Roadway Lights Section 4N.02 The location of the In -Roadway Warning Lights within the lanes should be based on engineering judgtnent. Standard: In -Roadway Warning Lights (IRWLs) shall not be placed on or within the crosswalk markings. If the In -Roadway Warning Lights are activated by a push button, the PUSH BUTTON FOR PEDESTRIAN WARNING LIGHTS, CROSS WITH CAUTION (R62E(CA)) sign shall be used. The following shall be considered when evaluating the need for In -Roadway Warning Lights: a. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled. b. An engineering traffic study to determine if In -Roadway Warning Lights are compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may or may not be, controlled by traffic signals or STOPIYIELD signs. (Existing unprotected xwalk, lights will increase awareness and safety) c. Standard traffic signs for crossings and crosswalk pavement markings are provided. (will be provided as proposed) d. At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period. (met) e. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak -hour pedestrian usage. (met) f. The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 km/h (45 mph) or less. (speed is 33 mph) g. In -Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight distance for the posted speed limit. (met) h. Public education on In -Roadway Warning Lights is conducted for new installations. (will be provided as proposed) 4 Year Accident Summary (2010 Thru 2007) Near Oak Intermediate School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Emperor/Oak 200' 10/23/08 15:10 Th Sideswipe PDO NB U Turn hit EB W Veh 2. Emperor/Oak 1 11/13/07 15:05 Tu Broadside PDO SB LFT hit Parked EB Veh 3. Oak/Emperor 167' 12/19/07 21:30 We Veh/Ped INJ Ped (14 yr) Crossing N EB Oak hit by NB Veh Flashing Yellow II at Schuol CrfI (AH llart� Wist Be 'SntlstfPdl Pact A AN -D Part B AND Part C i i:, l -: - . ,I. ; m ;l-,?- ih Il lr!" 'I, NPC lllo,,: g, kg f F YO �rj I I I - r L PUPAL :r) f I ) -Df URBAN (U) 'ATISFIED YES NO I i:JREC iES S -JISFIET , Ei (4, H 1 A 7 1,5 1- 1 F C E-< PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT OAK INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Children Crossing Sign to Replace Non -Standard Sign for NL at Emperor and Oak TGNHOL ! _ StATE LAW SW24-1(CA) v 4 �o SCHOOL Install SW24-1(CA) Assembly -on Oak between Emperor anti."s1� Camino Real �^�� R1-6 in roadway sign • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' Solar Flashing Assembly B with Downward Facing Arrow along with In - Road XWalk Lights �% 1; [i��i��; B a l l i ����L1:�� INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Oak Avenue south of Emperor Avenue looking north. The posted Oak Avenue at Emperor Avenue looking north. Emperor Avenue speed limit is 25 MPH. The 85 percentile speed is high at 33 MPH. provides access to Temple City High School sports facilities. Parents Oak Avenue at Emperor Avenue looking north. Theschool crosswalk is heavily used. A crossing guard is present in the afternoon. Oak Avenue at Camino Real Drive looking south. There is no existing signage at unprotected crosswalk. A Ped Count at the crosswalk was conducted. signage at unprotected crosswalk. A Ped Count at the crosswalk was conducted. Oak Avenue looking south. Can are picking up speed traveling northbound as they cross Camino Real Drive. Temple Citv High School Existing Safe Route to School • • • 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AT TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL -All-Way Stop Control 0 (gTH Thru 12th Grade) -Two-Way Stop Control 2,012 Students - Signal 0 - Accidents + 19 := '�Clff y`IIl1 '� 1,805 ADT ;�lN•�_- CamSnti b o E lir _i Q N f rte` I ii N W Existing Pavement Legends -'`- US-- -� AD "SCHOOL ZONE" No School Signage onTCBlvd exp eve = o 3dY16p1 _ Y �}•_'--� �, I i f .. �_..16avS'�=' It 1: F • 2,781 ADT i• Unprotected NS Xwalk (EL) No , pT, I13 -- ��•+ -� Existing Signage at Xwalk (ped N �R 4 IIliM .T (-__ count conducted) Advance �1't15r, Assembly D signs and legends existing on Lemon Existing Conditions: Lemon Avenue: Temple • 85th Percentile speed is high at 33 mph near the school City Blvd to Oak Avenue • No Posted 25 mph signs approaching school • 2,781 ADT on Lemon Ave • 1 lane each direction • No Parking 7-5 pm on both sides of Lemon • No existing Ped Xing Signs at Unprotected Xwalk at Trelawney School uses non-compliant in roadway ped signs • Cars are picking up speed traveling WB • Residential land use • Parking lot as well as bus areas access off of Lemon Temple City Boulevard: • Temple City Blvd 2lanes in each direction Lemon Ave to Camino • Adjacent to school only has pavement "School Zone 25 mph" Real no signage 0 Heavy pedestrian route CAMUTCD Guidelines for In -Roadway Lights Section 4N.02 For NS Existing Crosswalk at Lemon and Trelawney The location of the In -Roadway Warning Lights within the lanes should be based on engineering judgment. Standard: In -Roadway Warning Lights (IRWLs) shall not be placed on or within the crosswalk markings. If the In -Roadway Warning Lights are activated by a push button, the PUSH BUTTON FOR PEDESTRIAN WARNING LIGHTS, CROSS WITH CAUTION (R62E(CA)) sign shall be used. The following shall be considered when evaluating the need for In -Roadway Warning Lights: a. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled. (uncontrolled) b. An engineering traffic study to determine if In -Roadway Warning Lights are compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may or may not be, controlled by traffic signals or STOPNIELD signs. (Existing unprotected xwalk, lights will increase awareness and safety) c. Standard traffic signs for crossings and crosswalk pavement markings are provided. (will be provided as proposed) d. At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period. (met) e. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak -hour pedestrian usage. (met) L The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 kmlh (45 mph) or less. (speed is 33 mph) g. In -Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight distance for the posted speed limit. (met) h. Public education on In -Roadway Warning Lights is conducted for new installations. (will be provided as proposed) 4 Year Accident Summary (2010 Thru 2007) Near Temple City High School Location Dist. Date Time Day 1. Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave 2. Temple City Blvd/Lemon 3. Temple City Blvd/Lemon 4. Temple City Blvd/Lemon 5. Lemon/Oak 01/02/10 17:55 Sa 01/21/10 19:35 Th 01/26/10 14:20 Tu Collision Type Speed Rearend Speed Rearend Sideswipe Severity Factor INJ INJ PDO 350' 01/13/10 18:15 We Head-on INJ 102' 10/16/09 08:10 Fr Backing PDO NB Veh hit NB Veh SB Veh hit SB Veh WB Lft Veh hit SB Thru Veh NB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Veh WB Thru Veh hit Veh Backing out of Drwy Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 6. Lemon/Trelawney 1 06/19/09 17:35 Fr Sideswipe PDO WB Veh hit WB Thru Veh 7. Temple City 749' 06/11/09 14:05 Th Head-on PDO NB Veh hit SB Veh Blvd/Lemon N Speed 8. Temple 1 7/26/09 19:23 Su Broadside PDO WB Thru Veh hit SB City/Lemon Thru Veh 9. Oak/Lemon 30' S 04/13/08 03:32 Su Hit Obj PDO SB Veh hit Object 10. Temple City 1 02/09/08 15:40 Sa Sideswipe INJ WB Thru Veh hit SB Blvd/Camino Real Thru Veh 11. Temple City 1 10/02/08 15:05 Th Broadside INJ SB Thru Veh hit NB Blvd/Lemon Left Turn Veh 12. 21' E 05/03/07 08:10 Th Rearend PDO WB Thru Veh hit WB Lemon/Trelawney Speed Thru Veh 13. Temple City 1 05/16/07 13:30 We Broadside INJ SB Thru Veh hit WB Blvd/Camino Real Thru Veh 14. Temple City 309' 05/22/07 18:40 Tu Rearend INJ SB Thru Veh hit SB Blvd/Camino Real S Speed RT Veh 15. Temple City 21'S 01/20/07 11:48 Sa Broadside PDO NB Thru Veh hit WB Blvd/Lemon Thru Veh 16. Temple City 1 05/01/07 16:05 Tu Head -On PDO NB Left Veh hit SB Blvd/Lemon Thru Veh -.TC 7FT )/,TF -q, 3_-,-:77 - ;l lj r 1 H I I RURAL R) URBAN (U) Flashing Yellow Beacon at SC11001 C(0ssiflyb (Ali Parts rAkim Be Sansfied) Part t, MitO REC.z.IREI.'llr�, F11 I: ,,t E I I I I, AND Part B AND Part C SATISFIED YES NO J IVIia , Z,`-ISREC ES I 1-) 7 I- fIt­ i,t - - . , i .ie r, (-I li,-,, " P. , , 'I , It I,n I.':. Il 601- (1 T, I,. � I In i.vll 1p1,nkv*d b'lf Ci4 SA71SREC: 'E' K� Hi :_I S,`I71SHEE 'ES F 11- IF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL Install Yellow Crosswalks With Diagonal Or Zebra Striping at Existing Stop/Signal Controlled Intersections Install SR4-1(CA) Assembly -on Lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak and on Temple City Blvd between Lemon and Camino Real Camino Real Flashing Assembly B for unprotected Xwalk in East Leg at Lemon and Trelawney along with ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes SCHOOL SPEED SR&I(CA) LIMIT 25 I NIHri6MN ANE n14 • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7'Traffic Control for School Areas' 17:Ni[i7*114:f13111Mfg MAIag4 CITY HIGH SCHOOL Looking north at intersection of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Temple City Boulevard south of Camino Real Avenue looking north. Lemon Avenue east ofTrelawney Avenue looking west. Street fronts school and lacks "25 mph" posted signage. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue intersection. Use of non- compliant roadway Ped signs. Lemon Avenue at Oak Avenue intersection looking west. Zebra striping will make crosswalk more visible to motorists. Temple City Boulevard north of Lemon Avenue looking south. This is a heavy pedestrian route located on a busy arterial with high traffic volumes and two lanes in each direction. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Local Assistance 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 RECEIVED TTY 711 (916) 654-3151 Fax (916) 653-7621 JAN 28 " ? January 8, 2012 Mr. Jose Bulido City Manager City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 Attn: Mr. Jose Bulido Dear Mr. Bulido: TEMPLE CITY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE EDMUND G. BROWN Jr. Govemor File: 07-LA-0-TMPC SR2SL-5365(008) Longden/Oak;Camino Real/Oak;Temple City/Lemon; Muscatel/Emperor, Broadway/NoeI;L Your letter dated December 13, 2013 requested an allocation of State funds from the Safe Route to School Program (SR2S) for City of Temple City Safe Route to School project. The State hereby makes the allocation in the amount of $431,900.00 of State funds for all phases of this project effective January 08, 2013. You may now proceed with the project. Any work done after this date will be eligible for reimbursement. This Office will soon send you a Program Supplement Agreement for execution, along with a Master Agreement if one has not been executed. Please do not submit invoices for this project until the agreements are fully executed by both you and the State. The project award information should be submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) immediately after award of the construction contract. An Award Information sheet needs to be included with your first invoice for reimbursement. If you have any questions, please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer. Sincerely, AaIA11-0� f—WINTON EMMETT (ACTING), Chief Office of Project Implementation - South Division of Local Assistance c: DLA AE Project Files (07) DLAE - David Sosa Local Program Accounting Dawn Foster AFD FD o am XZ Qrz 0 0 10 >0 0 C� oz O:jz 40� 1zw 0 �ul 0 z o > 0 on Na WN H 00 > 0L-2. All Ell o ofOro > AFD FD o am XZ Qrz 0 0 10 >0 0 C� oz O:jz 40� 1zw 0 �ul 0 z STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Local Assistance 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 TTY 711 (916) 654-3151 Fax (916) 653-7621 February 5, 2013 Mr. Steve Masura Director of Community Development City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780-2249 Dear Mr. Masura: EDMUND G. BROWN Jr. Governor j: File: 07-LA-0-TMPC SR2SL-5365(008) Longden/Oak:Camino Real/Oak;Temple City/Lemon; Muscatel/Emperor, Broadway/Noel:L Enclosed are two originals for both the Administering Agency -State Master Agreement No. 004075, and the Program Supplement Agreement No. OK62 Rev. 000 . Please sign both originals of these two Agreements and return them to this office, Office of Local Programs - MS1within 90 days from the date of this letter. If the signed Agreements are not received back in this office within 90 days, funds will be disencumbered and/or deobligated. Alterations should not be made to the agreement language or funding. Attach your local agency's certified authorizing resolution that clearly identifies the project and the official authorized to execute the agreement. A fully executed copy of the agreement will be returned to you upon ratification by Caltrans. No invoices for reimbursement can be processed until the agreement is fully executed. A copy of the State approved finance letter, containing the fund encumbrance and reversion date information will be mailed to you with your copies of the executed agreements. Your prompt action is requested. If you have questions, please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer. Sincerely, r WINTON EMMETT (ACTING), Chief Office of Project Implementation - South Division of Local Assistance Enclosures c: OLP AE Project Files (07) DLAE - David Sosa PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. K62 to ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO 004075 Adv Project ID Date: 0713000271 Location: Project Number: E.A. Number: Locode: January 30, 2013 07-LA-0-TMPC SR2SL-5365(008) 5365 This Program Suoplement, effective , hereby adopts and incorporates into the Administering Agency -State Agreement No 00407S for State Funded Projects which was entered into between the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the STATE with an effective date of and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY on (See copy attached). The ADMINISTERING AGENCY further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted below encumbered to this project, Administering Agency accepts and will comply with the Special Covenants and remarks set forth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: Longden/Oak;Camino Real/Oak-,Temple City/Lemon, Muscatel/Emperor,Broadway/Neel;La Rosa/Rio Honda;Broadway/Cloverly,Daleview/Grand and LongleyfWoodruff TYPE OF WORK: Construct sideNalks,curb ramps,insta€l solar powered pedestrian activated crosswalks.speed feedback, Estimated Cost State Funds Matching Funds :STATE $431,900.00 LOCAL $488,900.00 $57.000.001 i CITY OF TEMPLE CITY OTHER STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation $0.00 By Chief, Office of Project Implementation Division of Local Assistance Date.._..._.................... ._- -- .._._.__..... I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: Accounting Officertj tY lI '.z / Date $431.900.00 Program Supplement 00-4075-K62- SERIAL Page 1 of 4 ST�TH CF C-.t4PQkN1A GSPART"F'c]§T OF TRANS�CF^.A'lCtt PROGRAM SUPPLMENT AND CERTIFICATION FORM PSCE !RE'I 01120101 to- STATE, CONTROLtER'S 6FECE ( 4=E=E PREoxs;Ep Claims Audits _— i/31l21i13 3301"C"Street, Rm 404 IHE+CUISIT;0^JN1j!.:S!;R CO\TRACik'.,tabER Sacramento, CA 95016 1 RQS-2660-071300000754.1 =R�m Department of Transportation Encumbrance Document r`N; C,R. LOCALAGUNCY: CITY OF TEMPLE CITY $431,900.00 PROCUREMENT TY PE. Local Assistance CHAPTER STATUTES ITEM YEAR PECIPECT TASK I SURTASK 21 2012 2660-102.042 2012-2013 20.30.010.5i5 2620/0400 TOTAL `PPDJECT N'Ut.4?ER T— 0713000271 AMOUNT $431,900,00 431,900.00 ADA Notil FU: intlrvidvals iVtltt sNv.�ry dLCd4hhas finis UUPurIEN i,c av2lla0IE in H..&0atf:lnimah. vQT inlglmauryo, calf m15, 6.`,4.6 m VTDD !b561-3600 Record, ana rmms f�fai,aycm::n:, 112r!, 5truet. t t<.39. Sacri rento, CA MF14, _ VC# 21265 # 1 SR2SL-5365;008) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS Chapter ; Statutes Item I Year Program SO Category Fund Source 1 AMOUNT i Program Supplement 00 -407S -K62- SERIAL Page 2 of 4 SR2SL-5365(008) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. 2. 1. This Program Supplement Agreement (PSA) is intended for Safe Route to School (SR2S) Program funded with State -only funding. Separate agreements are needed if PROJECT is also funded with any other STATE administered State or Federal funds. 2. The PROJECT will be administered in accordance with the SR2S Program Guidelines, as approved and amended, and the PROJECT Application. 3 This PSA allows reimbursement of eligible PROJECT expenditures to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY for which State funds are allocated. The effective State allocation date establishes eligibility for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to start reimbursable work and seek reimbursement of funds. Any work done prior to the effective allocation date is not eligible for reimbursement from the SR2S funds. 4. The STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that SR2S funds available for reimbursement to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY by the STATE will be limited to the amount allocated and encumbered by the STATE. Any additional funds made available by future allocations will be encumbered on this PROJECT by use of a STATE approved Allocation Letter and Finance Letter, 5. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to encumber the funds under agreement and award the construction contract by June 30th of the fiscal year in which funds are programmed. For projects unable to meet this deadline, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY may request, in writing, a time extension from the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). A one-time extension, for a maximum period of one year, may be granted by the DLAE. Projects unable to meet the new deadline may be dropped from the program. 6. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to provide contract award information to the STATE when submitting first invoice for this PROJECT. Attachment I of this PSA may be used for providing the necessary contract award information. 7. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the 'Report of Expenditures" to the DLAE within six (6) months after the project completion in accordance with Section 17.5 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). 8. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to follow all relevant State laws and requirements including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 3. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current published Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Program Supplement 00 -407S -K62- SERIAL Page 3 of 4 SR2SL-5365(008) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each phase by the execution of this Project Program Supplement Agreement, or by STATE's approval of an applicable Finance Letter. STATE reserves the right to suspend future authorizations/obligations for Federal aid projects, or encumberances for State funded projects, as well as to suspend invoice payments for any on-going or future project by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period. If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit for each phase a written explanation of the absence of PROJECT activity along with target billing date and target billing amount. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Final Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of PROJECT completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Program Supplement 00 -407S -K62- SERIAL Page 4 of 4 MASTER AGREEMENT ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE -FUNDED PROJECTS 07 City of Temple City District Administering Agency Agreement No. 004075 This AGREEMENT, is entered into effective this day of , 20 , by and between the City of Temple City, hereinafter referred to as "ADMINISTERING AGENCY," and the State of California, acting by and through its Department of Transportation (Caltrans), hereinafter referred to as "STATE", and together referred to as "PARTIES" or individually as a "PARTY." RECITALS: 1. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted legislation by which certain State funds are made available for use on local transportation related projects of public entities qualified to act as recipients of these state funds; and 2. WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has applied to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and/or STATE for funding from either the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), or other State -funded programs (herein referred to as STATE FUNDS), as defined in the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG), for use on local authorized transportation related projects as a local administered project(s), hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and 3. WHEREAS, said PROJECT will not receive any federal funds; and 4. WHEREAS, before STATE FUNDS will be made available for PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement to establish terms and conditions applicable to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY when receiving STATE FUNDS for a designated PROJECT facility and to the subsequent operation and maintenance of that completed facility. NOW, THEREFORE, the PARTIES agree as follows: Pagel of 16 ARTICLE 1 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 1. This AGREEMENT shall have no force or effect with respect to any program project unless and until a project -specific Program Supplement to this AGREEMENT for state funded projects, hereinafter referred to as "PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT", has been fully executed by both STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 2. The State approved project -specific allocation letter designate the party responsible for implementing PROJECT, type of work and location of PROJECT. 1 The PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT sets out special covenants as a condition for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to receive STATE FUNDS from/through STATE for designated PROJECT. The PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall also show these STATE FUNDS that have been initially encumbered for PROJECT along with the matching funds to be provided by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and/or others. Execution of PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT by the PARTIES shall cause ADMINISTERING AGENCY to adopt all of the terms of this AGREEMENT as though fully set forth therein in the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. Unless otherwise expressly delegated in a resolution by the governing body of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, and with written concurrence by STATE, the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall be approved and managed by the governing body of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to execute and return each project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT within ninety (90) days of receipt. The PARTIES agree that STATE may suspend future allocations, encumbrances and invoice payments for any on-going or future STATE FUNDED PROJECT performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if any project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is not returned within that ninety (90) day period unless otherwise agreed by STATE in writing. 5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY further agrees, as a condition to the release and payment of STATE FUNDS encumbered for the PROJECT described in each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, to comply with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and all of the agreed-upon Special Covenants or Remarks incorporated within the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, and Cooperative/Contribution Agreement where appropriate, defining and identifying the nature of the specific PROJECT. 6. STATE FUNDS will not participate in any portion of PROJECT work performed in advance of the effective date of the executed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT for said PROJECT. 7. Projects allocated with STATE FUNDS from the STIP will be administered in accordance with the current CTC STIP Guidelines, as adopted or amended and in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) published by STATE. S. Projects allocated with STATE FUNDS not programmed in the STIP will be administered in accordance with the applicable chapter of the LAPG and/or any other instructions published by STATE. 9. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's eligible costs for preliminary engineering work includes all preliminary work directly related to PROJECT up to contract award for construction, including, but not limited to, environmental studies and permits (E&P), preliminary surveys and reports, laboratory work, soil investigations, the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), advertising for bids, awarding of a contract and project development contract administration. Page 2 of 16 10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's eligible costs for construction engineering includes actual inspection and supervision of PROJECT construction work; construction staking; laboratory and field testing; and the preparation and processing of field reports, records, estimates, final reports, and allowable expenses of employees/consultants engaged in such activities. 11. Unless the PARTIES agree otherwise in writing, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's employees or its sub -contractor engineering consultant shall be responsible for all PROJECT engineering work. 12. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not proceed with final design of PROJECT until final environmental approval of PROJECT. Final design entails the design work necessary to complete the PS&E and other work necessary for a construction contract but not required earlier for environmental clearance of that PROJECT. 13. If PROJECT is not on STATE -owned right-of-way, PROJECT shall be constructed in accordance with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) that describes minimum statewide design standards for local agency streets and roads. The design standards for projects off the National Highway System (NNS) allow STATE to accept either the STATE's minimum statewide design standards or the approved geometric design standards of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Additionally, for projects off the NHS, STATE will accept ADMINISTERING AGENCY -approved standard specifications, standard plans, materials sampling and testing quality assurance programs that meet the conditions described in the then current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 14. If PROJECT involves work within or partially within STATE -owned right-of-way, that PROJECT shall also be subject to compliance with the policies, procedures and standards of the STATE Project Development Procedures Manual and Highway Design Manual and where appropriate, an executed cooperative agreement between STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY that outlines the PROJECT responsibilities and respective obligations of the PARTIES. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its' contractors shall each obtain an encroachment permit through STATE prior to commencing any work within STATE rights of way or work which affects STATE facilities. 15. When PROJECT is not on the State Highway System (SHS) but includes work to be performed by a railroad, the contract for such work shall be prepared by ADMINISTERING AGENCY or by STATE, as the PARTIES may hereafter agree. In either event, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall enter into an agreement with the railroad providing for future maintenance of protective devices or other facilities installed under the contract. 16. The Department of General Services, Division of the State Architect, or its designee, shall review the contract PS&E for the construction of buildings, structures, sidewalks, curbs and related facilities for accessibility and usability. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a PROJECT construction contract for these types of improvements until the State Architect has issued written approval stating that the PROJECT plans and specifications comply with the provisions of sections 4450 and 4454 of the California Government Code, if applicable. Further requirements and guidance are provided in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. 17. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall provide or arrange for adequate supervision and inspection of each PROJECT. While consultants may perform supervision and inspection work for PROJECT with a fully qualified and licensed engineer, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall provide a full-time employee to be in responsible charge of each PROJECT. Page 3 of 16 18. Unless otherwise provided in the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall advertise, award, and administer the PROJECT construction contract or contracts. 19. The cost of maintenance, security, or protection performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY or contractor forces during any temporary suspension of PROJECT or at any other time may not be charged to the PROJECT. 20. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit PROJECT -specific award information, using Exhibit 23-A of the LAPD, to STATE's District Local Assistance Engineer, within sixty (60) days after contract award. A copy of Exhibit 23-A shall also be included with the submittal of the first invoice for a construction contract by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to: Department of Transportation, Division of Accounting Local Programs Accounting Branch, MS #33, PO Box 942874, Sacramento, California 94274-0001. 21. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of project completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance Chapters 17 and 19 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 22. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. 23. The Governor and the Legislature of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdictions, have prescribed certain nondiscrimination requirements with respect to contract and other work financed with public funds. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the requirements of the FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDENDUM, attached hereto as Exhibit A and further agrees that any agreement entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY with a third party for performance of work connected with PROJECT shall incorporate Exhibit A (with third party's name replacing ADMINISTERING AGENCY) as parts of such agreement. 24. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall include in all subcontracts awarded when applicable, a clause that requires each subcontractor to comply with California Labor Code requirements that all workers employed on public works aspects of any project (as defined in California Labor Code sections 1720-1815) be paid not less than the general prevailing wage rates predetermined by the Department of Industrial Relations as effective at the date of contract award by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Page 4 of 16 ARTICLE II - RIGHTS OF WAY 1. No contract for the construction of a STATE FUNDED PROJECT shall be awarded until all necessary rights of way have been secured. Prior to the advertising for construction of PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall certify and, upon request, shall furnish STATE with evidence that all necessary rights-of-way are available for construction purposes or will be available by the time of award of the construction contract. 2. The furnishing of rights of way by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as provided for herein includes, and is limited to, the following, unless the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT provides otherwise. (a) Expenditures to purchase all real property required for PROJECT free and clear of liens, conflicting easements, obstructions and encumbrances, after crediting PROJECT with the fair market value of any excess property retained and not disposed of by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. (b) The cost of furnishing of right-of-way as provided for herein includes, in addition to real property required for the PROJECT, title free and clear of obstructions and encumbrances affecting PROJECT and the payment, as required by applicable law, of damages to owners of remainder real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by PROJECT. (c) The cost of relocation payments and services provided to owners and occupants pursuant to Government Code sections 7260-7277 when PROJECT displaces an individual, family, business, farm operation or nonprofit organization. (d) The cost of demolition and/or the sale of all improvements on the right-of-way after credit is recorded for sale proceeds used to offset PROJECT costs. (e) The cost of all unavoidable utility relocation, protection or removal. (f) The cost of all necessary hazardous material and hazardous waste treatment, encapsulation or removal and protective storage for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY accepts responsibility and where the actual generator cannot be identified and recovery made. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability that may result in the event the right-of-way for a PROJECT, including, but not limited to, being clear as certified or if said right-of-way is found to contain hazardous materials requiring treatment or removal to remediate in accordance with Federal and State laws. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall pay, from its own non-matching funds, any costs which arise out of delays to the construction of PROJECT because utility facilities have not been timely removed or relocated, or because rights-of-way were not available to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the orderly prosecution of PROJECT work. Page 5 of 16 ARTICLE III - MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT 1. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, constructed, rehabilitated, or restored by PROJECT for its intended public use until such time as the parties might amend this AGREEMENT to otherwise provide. With the approval of STATE, ADMINISTERING AGENCY or its successors in interest in the PROJECT property may transfer this obligation and responsibility to maintain and operate PROJECT property for that intended public purpose to another public entity. 2. Upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY's acceptance of the completed construction contract or upon contractor being relieved of the responsibility for maintaining and protecting PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be responsible for the maintenance, ownership, liability, and the expense thereof, for PROJECT in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of STATE and if PROJECT falls within the jurisdictional limits of another Agency or Agencies, it is the duty of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to facilitate a separate maintenance agreement(s) between itself and the other jurisdictional Agency or Agencies providing for the operation, maintenance, ownership and liability of PROJECT. Until those agreements are executed, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be responsible for all PROJECT operations, maintenance, ownership and liability in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of STATE. If, within ninety (90) days after receipt of notice from STATE that a PROJECT, or any portion thereof, is not being properly operated and maintained and ADMINISTERING AGENCY has not satisfactorily remedied the conditions complained of, the approval of future STATE FUNDED PROJECTS of ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be withheld until the PROJECT shall have been put in a condition of operation and maintenance satisfactory to STATE. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a PROJECT that has been vacated through due process of law with STATE's concurrence. 3. PROJECT and its facilities shall be maintained by an adequate and well-trained staff of engineers and/or such other professionals and technicians as PROJECT reasonably requires. Said operations and maintenance staff may be employees of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, another unit of government, or a contractor under agreement with ADMINISTERING AGENCY. All maintenance will be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the complete PROJECT improvements. Page 6 of 16 ARTICLE IV - FISCAL PROVISIONS 1. All contractual obligations of STATE are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the CTC. 2. STATE'S financial commitment of STATE FUNDS will occur only upon the execution of this AGREEMENT, the execution of each project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or STATE's approved finance letter. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY may submit signed duplicate invoices in arrears for reimbursement of allowable PROJECT costs on a monthly or quarterly progress basis once the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT has been executed by STATE. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six months commencing after the STATE FUNDS are encumbered on either the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or through a project -specific finance letter approved by STATE. STATE reserves the right to suspend future allocations and invoice payments for any on-going or future STATE FUNDED project performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period 5. Invoices shall be submitted on ADMINISTERING AGENCY letterhead that includes the address of ADMINISTERING AGENCY and shall be formatted in accordance with Chapter 5 of the LAPM. 6. Invoices must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for allowable costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs. 7. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY can only be released by STATE as reimbursements of actual allowable PROJECT costs already incurred and paid for by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 8. An indirect cost allocation plan and related documentation are to be provided to STATE (Caltrans Audits & Investigations) annually for review and approval prior to ADMINISTERING AGENCY seeking reimbursement of indirect cost incurred within each fiscal year being claimed for reimbursement. The indirect cost allocation plan must be prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87 and Chapter 4 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 9. STATE will withhold the greater of either two (2) percent of the total of all STATE FUNDS encumbered for each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or $40,000 until ADMINISTERING AGENCY submits the Final Report of Expenditures for each completed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT PROJECT, 10. The estimated total cost of PROJECT, the amount of STATE FUNDS obligated, and the required matching funds may be adjusted by mutual consent of the PARTIES with an allocation letter and finance letter. STATE FUNDING may be increased to cover PROJECT cost increases only if such additional funds are available and the CTC and/or STATE concurs with that increase in the form of an allocation and finance letter. Page 7 of 16 11. When such additional STATE FUNDS are not available, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that any increases in PROJECT costs must be defrayed with ADMINISTERING AGENCY's own funds. 12. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall use its own non STATE FUNDS to finance the local share of eligible costs and all PROJECT expenditures or contract items ruled ineligible for financing with STATE FUNDS. STATE shall make the final determination of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's cost eligibility for STATE FUNDED financing with respect to claimed PROJECT costs. 13. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse STATE for STATE's share of costs for work performed by STATE at the request of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. STATE's costs shall include overhead assessments in accordance with section 8755.1 of the State Administrative Manual. 14. STATE FUNDS allocated from the STIP are subject to the timely use of funds provisions enacted by Senate Bill 45, approved in 1997, and subsequent STIP Guidelines and State procedures approved by the CTC and STATE. 15. STATE FUNDS encumbered for PROJECT are available for liquidation only for five (5) years from the beginning of the State fiscal year when those funds were appropriated in the State Budget. STATE FUNDS not liquidated within these periods will be reverted unless a Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA) is submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance in accordance with Government Code section 16304. The exact date of fund reversion will be reflected in the STATE signed PROJECT finance letter. 16. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROJECT -related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid to rank and file STATE employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY are in excess of DPA rates, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference, and any overpayments inadvertently paid by STATE shall be reimbursed to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on demand. 17. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments, and 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. 18. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree that (a) Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items and (b) those parties shall comply with federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 GFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Every sub -recipient receiving PROJECT funds as a contractor or sub -contractor under this AGREEMENT shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the provisions set Page 8 of 16 forth in 23 CFR Parts 140, 645 and 646 when contracting with railroad and utility companies. 19. Any PROJECT costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under OMB Circular A-87, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, 23 CFR Parts 140, 645 and 646 or 49 CFR, Part 18, are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE. 20. Upon written demand by STATE, any overpayment to ADMINISTERING AGENCY of amounts invoiced to STATE shall be returned to STATE. 21. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY fail to refund any moneys due STATE as provided herein or should ADMINISTERING AGENCY breach this AGREEMENT by failing to complete PROJECT without adequate justification and approval by STATE, then, within thirty (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed to in writing between the PARTIES hereto, STATE, acting through the State Controller, the State Treasurer, the CTC or any other public entity or agency, may intercept, withhold and demand the transfer of an amount equal to the amount paid by or owed to STATE for each PROJECT, from future apportionments, or any other funds due ADMINISTERING AGENCY from the Highway Users Tax Fund or any other sources of funds, and/or may also withhold approval of future STATE FUNDED projects proposed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 22. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY be declared to be in breach of this AGREEMENT or otherwise in default thereof by STATE, and if ADMINISTERING AGENCY is constituted as a joint powers authority, special district, or any other public entity not directly receiving funds through the State Controller, STATE is authorized to obtain reimbursement from whatever sources of funding are available, including the withholding or transfer of funds, pursuant to Article IV - 21, from those constituent entities comprising a joint powers authority or by bringing of an action against ADMINISTERING AGENCY or its constituent member entities, to recover all funds provided by STATE hereunder. 23. ADMINISTERING AGENCY acknowledges that the signatory party represents the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and further warrants that there is nothing within a Joint Powers Agreement, by which ADMINISTERING AGENCY was created, if any exists, that would restrict or otherwise limit STATE's ability to recover STATE FUNDS improperly spent by ADMINISTERING AGENCY in contravention of the terms of this AGREEMENT. Page 9 of 16 ARTICLE V AUDITS, THIRD PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS 1. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT work and records when determined to be necessary or appropriate and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with STATE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by paragraph three (3) of Article V. 2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The accounting system of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices sent to or paid by STATE. 3. For the purpose of determining compliance with Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance and costs of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code section 8546.7, ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above -referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT and PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire PROJECT period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under any PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a PROJECT for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions and ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of OMB Circular A-133 if it receives a total of $500,000 or more in STATE FUNDS in a single fiscal year. The STATE FUNDS received under PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT are a part of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 20.205, Highway Planning and Research. 5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to include all PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTS adopting the terms of this AGREEMENT in the schedule of projects to be examined in ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S annual audit and in the schedule of projects to be examined under its single audit prepared in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. 6. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a construction contract over $10,000 or other contracts over $25,000 [excluding professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code sections 4525 (d), (e) and (f)j on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed under this AGREEMENT without the prior written approval of STATE. All contracts awarded by ADMINISTERING AGENCY intended or used as local match credit must meet the requirements set forth in this AGREEMENT regarding local match funds. Page 10 of 16 7. Any subcontract entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain all of the provisions of Article IV, FISCAL PROVISIONS, and this ARTICLE V, AUDITS, THIRD -PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS and shall mandate that travel and per diem reimbursements and third -party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as PROJECT costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors. 8. To be eligible for local match credit, ADMINISTERING AGENCY must ensure that local match funds used for a PROJECT meet the fiscal provisions requirements outlined in ARTICLE IV in the same manner that is required of all other PROJECT expenditures. 9. In addition to the above, the pre -award requirements of third -party contractor/consultants with ADMINISTERING AGENCY should be consistent with LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES. Page! 1 of 16 ARTICLE VI - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to use all PROJECT funds reimbursed hereunder only for transportation purposes that are in conformance with Article XIX of the California State Constitution and other California laws. 2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations, and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines and Local Assistance Procedures Manual as published by STATE and incorporated herein, including all subsequent approved revisions thereto applicable to PROJECT unless otherwise designated in the project -specific executed PROJECT SUPPLEMENT. 3. This AGREEMENT is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by the State Legislature or adopted by the CTC that may affect the provisions, terms, or funding of this AGREEMENT in any manner. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the officers and employees of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, when engaged in the performance of this AGREEMENT, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of STATE. 5. Each project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall separately establish the terms and funding limits for each described PROJECT funded under this AGREEMENT and that PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. No STATE FUNDS are obligated against this AGREEMENT. 6. ADMINISTERING AGENCY certifies that neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor its principals are suspended or debarred at the time of the execution of this AGREEMENT, and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will notify STATE immediately in the event a suspension or a debarment occurs after the execution of this AGREEMENT. 7. ADMINISTERING AGENCY warrants, by execution of this AGREEMENT, that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE has the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability, pay only for the value of the PROJECT work actually performed, or in STATE's discretion, to deduct from the price of PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 8. In accordance with Public Contract Code section 10296, ADMINISTERING AGENCY hereby certifies under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against ADMINISTERING AGENCY within the immediate preceding two (2) year period because of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's failure to comply with an order of a federal court that orders ADMINISTERING AGENCY to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. 9. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with STATE that may have an impact upon the outcome of this AGREEMENT or any individual PROJECT encompassed within a PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall also list current contractors who may have a financial interest in the outcome of a PROJECT undertaken pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Page 12 of 16 10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY hereby certifies that it does not now have nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of any PROJECT initiated under this AGREEMENT. 11. ADMINISTERING AGENCY warrants that this AGREEMENT was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks or other unlawful consideration either promised or paid to any STATE employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to terminate this AGREEMENT without liability, to pay only for PROJECT work actually performed, or to deduct from a PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT price or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback, or other unlawful consideration. 12. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the STATE's Contract Officer, who may consider any written or verbal evidence submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. The decision of the Contract Officer, issued in writing, shall be conclusive and binding on the PARTIES on all questions of fact considered and determined by the Contract Officer. 13. Neither the pending of a dispute nor its consideration by the Contract Officer will excuse the ADMINISTERING AGENCY from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT and each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. 14. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction of ADMINISTERING AGENCY arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims and suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this AGREEMENT. 15. Neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this AGREEMENT. 16. In the event of (a) ADMINISTERING AGENCY failing to timely proceed with effective PROJECT work in accordance with the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT; (b) failing to maintain any applicable bonding requirements; and (c) otherwise materially violating the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and/or any PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, STATE reserves the right to terminate funding for that PROJECT upon thirty (30) days' written notice to ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 17. No termination notice shall become effective if, within thirty (30) days after receipt of a Notice of Termination, ADMINISTERING AGENCY either cures the default involved or, if the default is not reasonably susceptible of cure within said thirty (30) day period the ADMINISTERING Page 13 of 16 AGENCY proceeds thereafter to complete that cure in a manner and time line acceptable to STATE. 18. Any such termination shall be accomplished by delivery to ADMINISTERING AGENCY of a Notice of Termination, which notice shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days after receipt, specifying the reason for the termination, the extent to which funding of work under this AGREEMENT and the applicable PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is terminated and the date upon which such termination becomes effective, if beyond thirty (30) days after receipt. During the period before the effective termination date, ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE shall meet to attempt to resolve any dispute. In the event of such termination, STATE may proceed with the PROJECT work in a manner deemed proper by STATE. If STATE terminates funding for PROJECT with ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the reasons stated in paragraph sixteen (16) of ARTICLE VI, STATE shall pay ADMINISTERING AGENCY the sum due ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or STATE -approved finance letter prior to termination, provided, however, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is not in default of the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT or the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and that the cast of any PROJECT completion to STATE shall first be deducted from any sum due ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 19. In the case of inconsistency or conflicts with the terms of this AGREEMENT and that of a project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or Cooperative Agreement, the terms stated in that PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or Cooperative Agreement shall prevail over those in this AGREEMENT. 20. Without the written consent of STATE, this AGREEMENT is not assignable by ADMINISTERING AGENCY either in whole or in part. 21. No alteration or variation of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the PARTIES, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this AGREEMENT by their duly authorized officer. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2 Chief, Office of Project Implementation Division of Local Assistance Date Page 14 of 16 City of Temple City 120 City of Temple City Representative Name & Title (Authorized Governing Body Representative) Date EXHIBIT A - FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDENDUM 1. In the performance of this Agreement, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will not discriminate against any employee for employment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, ancestry or national origin, physical disability, medical condition, marital status, political affiliation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, sexual orientation, color, religion, ancestry, or national origin, physical disability, medical condition, marital status, political affiliation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment; upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees for employment, notices to be provided by STATE setting forth the provisions of this Fair Employment section. 2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractor(s) and all subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, 1290-0 et seq.), and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., Title 2, 7285.0, et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code section 12900(a -f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this AGREEMENT by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Each of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and all subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreements, as appropriate. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all contracts and subcontracts to perform work under this AGREEMENT. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will permit access to the records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data and records by STATE, the State Fair Employment and Housing Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by STATE, for the purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment section of this Agreement. 5. Remedies for Willful Violation: (a) STATE may determine a willful violation of the Fair Employment provision to have occurred upon receipt of a final judgment to that effect from a court in an action to which ADMINISTERING AGENCY was a party, or upon receipt of a written notice from the Fair Employment and Housing Commission that it has investigated and determined that ADMINISTERING AGENCY has violated the Fair Employment Practices Act and had issued an order under Labor Code section 1426 which has become final or has obtained an injunction under Labor Code section 1429. (b) For willful violation of this Fair Employment Provision, STATE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by STATE in securing the goods or services thereunder shall be borne and paid for by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and by the surety under the performance bond, if any, and STATE may deduct from any moneys due Page 15 of 16 or thereafter may become due to ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the difference between the price named in the Agreement and the actual cost thereof to STATE to cure ADMINISTERING AGENCY's breach of this Agreement. Page 16 of 16 Attachment 2: City Standard Contract CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT [With alternative highlighted sections if Agreement includes any work for ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING, and/or CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT services] By and Between THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation and [insert name of consultant herel AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA AND [name ofconsultantl This Agreement for Consultant Services ("Agreement") is entered into as of this day of 2010 by and between the City of TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation ("City") and , a ("Consultant'). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a [here refer to process used, i.e.: request for qualifications / request for proposals / invitation for bids / or other], the performance of the [here specify type of professional service IF one of the following: architectural / landscape architectural / engineering / environmental / land surveying / construction project management] services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a [here refer to type of submittal, i.e.: proposal / quote / bid, etc,] for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Consultant was selected by the City on the basis of Consultant's demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. D. Pursuant to the City of Temple City's Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Consultant Services Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this Agreement. E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT. Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement' of this Agreement, the scope of services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit "A." Should the scope of services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Consultant shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement pursuant to Section 21 of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Consultant to continue performing the scope of services until such services are complete. SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" which is incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to or outside of those set forth in this Agreement or listed in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or City Manager of City. Consultant shall be compensated for any such additional services in the amounts and in the maturer agreed to by the City Council or City Manager. SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. (a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit `B" "Compensation" and made a part of this Agreement. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed dollars ($ ), unless additional compensation is approved in writing by the City Council or City Manager. (b) Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub -category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub -consultant contracts. Sub -consultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit `B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. (c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant's correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE. City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant's work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Consultant's work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Consultant's work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City's acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Consultant's work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, sections 16 and 17, pertaining to indemnification and insurance, respectively. SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Consultant. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warrants related to Standard of Performance and found in Section 9 of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 7. CONSULTANT'S BOOKS AND RECORDS. (a) Consultant shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Consultant's performance of services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. (b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alterative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. (c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City and that such documents and records be maintained by the requesting party. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors -in -interest and authorized representatives. SECTION 8. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. (a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this Section 9, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria are set forth in the Scope of Work that shall also be applicable to Consultants work under this Contract. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warranties related to Standard of Performance shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES. Consultant shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section. SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS It is the understanding of City and Consultant that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, "construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work. [Note: Consult City Attorney if intended scope of ivork DOES include any of Nee foregoing.] SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement. SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et sec., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City. SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. (a) Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant's performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant will, perform non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the scope of work under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered 'voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant , its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Indemnification for Professional Liabilitv. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub -consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liabilitv. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or sub -contractors of Consultant. (c) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -consultant / sub -contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth here is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. (d) Citv's Sole Neeliaence, The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. [Note: Use alternate Section 16 below if Agreement includes any work. for ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING, and/or CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT services] SECTION 16 INDEMNIFICATION (a) Indemnification for Design Activities As provided under Civil Code Section 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims. actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders, judgments, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, (collectively "Claims") to the extent same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub - consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement, with the understanding that in the event Claims are found by the trier of fact to have been caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the City and its contractors and consultants, and Consultant, damages and expenses from both indemnity and duty to defend obligations shall be home by each party in proportion to its negligence. (b) Indemnification for General Services. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's Services other than design services set forth in Civil Code Section 2782.2, Consultant shall to the fullest extent permitted by law indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub -consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (c) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including reasonable attorneys fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or sub -contractors of Consultant. (d) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -consultant / sub -contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. (e) Citv's Sole Neelieence. The provisions of this Section 16 do not apply to Claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. SECTION 17. INSURANCE. Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "C" "Insurance," which is incorporated herein by this reference. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Consultant agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request. SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT. The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant's duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Council. Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this Agreement. City acknowledges, however, that Consultant, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors. SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. SECTION 20, TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. (a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Consultant. In the event such notice is given, Consultant shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City. (c) If either Consultant or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Consultant, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Consultant or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Consultant's possession shall be returned to City. Consultant shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Consultant, prepared as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. SECTION 21. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default under the ternis of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS Consultant shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local govermuents, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes. SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement. SECTION 24. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To City: City of Temple City Attn: City Manager 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 To Consultant: Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represents and warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION. This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative, following approval of this Agreement by the City Council. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make minor amendments to this Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not materially change the Agreement or make a commitment of additional funds of the City. All other changes, modifications, and amendments shall require the prior approval of the City Council. SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. SECTION 28. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. SECTION 29. WAIVER. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any terns, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Los Angeles. SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES. In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other Agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Consultant and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other Agreements, whether oral or written, made by any party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid and binding unless in writing duly executed by the parties or their authorized representatives. SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first -above written. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY By: Jose Pulido, City Manager ATTEST: Mary Flandrick City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM C Eric S. Vail City Attorney Its: Its: NOTE: CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPER'S BUSINESS ENTITY. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On I before me, , personally appeared , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/lier/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signarme(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, personally appeared ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following Services: A. B. C. D. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. B. C. D. III. During performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. B. C. D. IV. The tangible work products and status reports will be delivered to the City pursuant to the following schedule: A. B. C. D. V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. B. C. D. VI. Consultant will utilize the following subcontractors to accomplish the Services: A. B. C. D. VII. AMENDMENT The Scope of Services, including services, work products, and personnel, are subject to change by mutual Agreement. In the absence of mutual Agreement regarding the need to change any aspects of performance, Consultant shall comply with the Scope of Services as indicated above. EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall use the following rates of pay in the performance of the Services: A. hobl [hourly rate] B. riobl rhourly rate] C. Hobl rhourly rate] D. riobl rhourly rate] E. riobl [hourly rate] 1I. Consultant may utilize subcontractors as indicated in this Agreement. The hourly rate for any subcontractor is not to exceed $ per hour without written authorization from the City Manager or his designee. I1I. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours Nvorked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all supplies properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all travel properly charged to the Services. D. Line items for all equipment properly charged to the Services. E. Line items for all materials properly charged to the Services. Line items for all subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $ as provided in Section 4 of this Agreement. EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE A. Insurance Reauirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City Manager or City Counsel, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: 1. Minimum Scone of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. (3) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insurance and covering all persons providing services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (4) Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a "claims made" basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 3 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant's services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 3 -year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. 2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of applicable insurance no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 for each occurrence of bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, and $2,000,000 annual aggregate. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth in Subsections (1) and (2) above. (4) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident. (5) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. B. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions: 1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except atter 30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City. 2. General Liabilitv and Automobile Liabilitv Coveraees. (1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant ; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees. (2) Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant's insurance. (3) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 3. Workers' Conmensation and Emulover's Liabilitv Coveraee. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Consultant. C. Other Reauirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides. 2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. 3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. ATTACHMENT ti L i� A no 0 C�<1rowN� June 17, 2013 CLARIFICATIONS TO QUESTIONS FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY In response to questions received, the following clarifications have been issued: Question 1: Does this RFP fall under City's on-call service contracts, or is this a standalone proposal? Answer 1: This is a standalone proposal, which any qualified consultant can propose on. Question 2: Is Transtech Engineers eligible to propose on the design? Answer 2: No. Transtech Engineers is managing the Project, and will not propose on the design. Question 3: Can we get a copy of Plan Holders? Answer 3: There is no Plan Holders List. This request is not for Notice Inviting Bids for Construction. This request is for Engineering Services Proposals for preparation of plans. There are no plans prepared yet. The plans will be prepared by the selected consultant. Question 4: Will the City be able to provide any existing survey, if so is it digital? What are the limits? Answer 4: No. The City will not provide any survey. The selected consultant is responsible to do field work, reviews and surveys as necessary to prepare a set of construction plans. Question 5: Are the ped activated crosswalks, LED lit signs, speed feedback signs, and flashing beacons to be solar powered, and only solar powered? Answer 5: This would be the preferred approach; however, final design will confirm. Additional: Few pages in project funding application (Attachment 1 of the RFP) were missing. A new Appendix 1 is attached. All other terms and conditions in the RFP shall remain unchanged. Reminder: 3 Copies of Proposals are to be submitted by June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm to: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 For questions regarding this project, please contact via e-mail only: Salim Bouhamidi, Project Coordinator selim.bouhamidiC@transtech.ore CLARIFICATIONS TO QUESTIONS —FOR RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, SR2S PROJECT, TEMPLE CITY Page 1 Attachment 1: Funding Documents Application ID: SKS10-07-Temple City -1 Exhibit A APPLICATION FOR STATE -LEGISLATED SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S) PROGRAM CYCLE 10 APPLICATION SUMMARY This summary page is filled out automatically once the application is completed. IMPORTANT: After the application is finalized, please save this PDF form using the Application ID as the file name. Application ID: (Use this as the file name) Caltrans District: Applicant (Agency): Application No SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 07 Temple City 1 out of 1 SR2S Funds Requested: $431,900.00 Project Description Install five feet wide sidewalks, speed feedback signs, new traffic signs and crosswalk striping, ADA ramps, solar ped actuated lights and crosswalks, and flashing beacon school speed limit signs. Project Location Nine separate schools located at intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff. Page 1 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 STATE -LEGISLATED SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S) PROGRAM APPLICATION ( CYCLE 10) Please read the Safe Routes to School Program Guidelines available on the SR2S web site and pay special attention to Application Form Instructions while preparing this application. An incomplete or altered application format will be disqualified from further review. The agency must save the completed PDF form using the application ID as the file name. Please send the original, one color copy and a copy on CD of the application form and attachments to the DLAE by the due date of Friday, March 30, 2012 (by close of business of or postmarked no later than this date) . Refer to the DLA's web site for the DLAE in your District and the mailing address: httD://www.dotca.eov/ha/LocalPrograms/dlae.htm. Applicant (Agency): (Temple City County: Caltrans District: I. Applicant Information (Los Angeles County 107 Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): ISCAG Address: 19701 Las Tunas Drive City: ITemple City Zip Code: ICA 91780 1 (Enter only a 5 -digit number.) Name of Agency Contact Person (Last, First): lAriizumi, Bryan Phone Number: 1(626) 285-2171 1 Email: lbariizumi@templecity.us Extensional Page 2 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 II. School Information *All schools benefited by this SR2S Project are to be listed School No. 1 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 101 2 12 19 15 18 I Full School Name: ILongden Elementary School I School Address: 19501 Wendon St,Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (Temple City Unified School District I District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment991 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 450 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Progran-0): 36 %(Enter O-100) %of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 40 %(Enter 0-100) (1)Refer to the Calybrnia Department of Education ivebsite: http://",iv.cde.ca.govldslslilcitTiilesgfdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 2 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 I 0 15 12 I - 16 I o 12 121 9 16 16 Full School Name: IOak Avenue Intermediate School School Address: 16623 Oak Avenue, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (Temple City Unified School District I District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment 951 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 500 • of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 40 %(Enter 0-100) % of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 50 %(Enter 0-100) (()Refer to the California Department of Education website: http:/Rvwty.cde. ca.gov/ds/sh/cta/filesafdc. asp (2) School route is defined as route students mould take behveen home and school School No. 3 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) F-1[91 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 119 13 18 16 17 19 I Full School Name: (Temple City High School School Address: 19501 Lemon Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (Temple City Unified School District I District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 I Total Student Enrollment E71 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 1,000 • of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 37 %(Enter 0-100) • of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 50 %(Enter 0-100) (1)Refer to the California Department of Education website: http:/Rvww.cde.ca.goildslshleiiTiilesafdc. asp (2) School route is defined us route students would take behveen home and school Page 3 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 School No. 4 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 10 12 12 19 13 13 Full School Name: IEmperor Elementary School School Address: 16415 Muscatel Ave, San Gabriel, CA 91755 School District: ITemple City Unified School District District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment 665 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 200 • of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 34 °� (Enter 0-100) % of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 24 %(Enter 0-100) (1) Referto the California DepartmentofEducatiotrn,ebsite: http://lii",.cde.ca.gor/dslslr/civ/filesafdc.asp (1) School route is defined as route students would take benveen home and school School No. 5 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) F-151 - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 19 16 12 12 10 13 1 Full School Name: I First Lutheran School I School Address: 19123 Broadway Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: IPrivate School IDistrict Address: 19123 Broadway Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment111 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 20 % of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 10 %(Enter 0-100) % of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 10 %(Enter 0-100) (1) Refer to the California Department of Education website: http://x,aiv.cde.ca.gov/dslslilcivlfilesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 6 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) [1 6] - 16 15 10 15 12 I - 16 10 12 12 19 14 I 1 Full School Name: ILa Rosa Elementary School School Address: 19301 La Rosa Dr,Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (Temple City Unified School District I District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment582 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 200 °/aofStudents Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 39 % (Enter o-100) • of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 32 %(Enter 0-100) (])Refer to the California Department of Education website: http:/Rvrvw.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/civifi1esafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as ante shideats would take benveen home and school Page 4 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: 5132510 -07 -Temple City -1 School No. 7 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 15 10 15 121 - 16 10 12 12 19 12 15 Full School Name: ICloverly Elementary School School Address: 15476 Cloverly Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (Temple City Unified School District District Address: 19700 Las Tunas Dr, Temple City, CA 91780 Total Student Enrollment447 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 150 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 40 %(Enter 0-100) % of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 30 %(Enter 0-100) (1) Refer to the Cal fornia Department of Education website: http-//1rMmecde ea.gov/ds/sWmr/filesafde.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take benween horse and school School No. 8 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) F179 - 16 14 15 10 11 I- 16 10 I 113 11 14 18 Full School Name: ICleminson Elementary School I School Address: 15213 N Daleview Ave, Temple City, CA 91780 School District: (EI Monte City Elementary School District District Address: 13540 Lexington Ave, EI Monte, CA 91731 Total Student Enrollment 399 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 200 %of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program (1): 24 °h (Enter 0-100) %of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 45 %(Enter 0-100) (1)Refer to the California Department of Education website: http.//uiww.cde.ca.gov/ds/sl7lcw/frlesafdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school School No. 9 County -District -School Code (CDS)(1) 1 9 - 16 14 12 16 11- 16 10 11111119 11 Full School Name: ILongley Way Elementary School School Address: 12601 Longley Way, Arcadia, CA 91007 School District: 1Arcadia Unified School District District Address: 1234 Campus Dr, Arcadia, CA 91007 Total Student Enrollment 485 Approximate number of Students living along school route proposed for improvement(2) 50 % of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program(1): 22 %(Enter 0-100) % of Students who Currently Walk or Bicycle to School: 117 %%(Enter 0-100) (1)Refertothe California DepartnreutofEducatiorrrwebsite: http://nitryr.cde.ca.gov/ds/dr/cw/filesgfdc.asp (2) School route is defined as route students would take between home and school Page 5 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2510-07-Temple City -1 III. Project Information Project Description: Provide a brief description of the proposed project improvements i.e. Construct new sidewalks, curb ramps, and crosswalks; install bicycle racks and lockers (limited to 250 characters). Install five feet wide sidewalks, speed feedback signs, new traffic signs and crosswalk striping, ADA ramps, solar ped actuated lights and crosswalks, and flashing beacon school speed limit signs. Project Location: Provide a brief description of the general location(s) of the proposed project i.e. The intersection of First St and Second St. (limited to 250 characters). Nine separate schools located at intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff. State Legislative Districts of project location (separate Districts by commas when there are multiple): Assembly District: 121, 24, 29 Senate District: 144,49 Number of project applications being submitted by the applicant (agency): 1� Priority of this application: 7� Note: Priority of this application is required. The application must be ranked and prioritized with the priority number starting from 1 ("1" is the highest priority. No two applications may have the same priority number. Also enter "1" if this is the only application from your agency.) Improvement categories included in the proposed project: (check all that apply) ❑X Pedestrian Facilities ❑ Bicycle Facilities © Traffic Control Devices ® Traffic Calming and Speed Reduction ® Public Outreach and Education ❑ Other (describe below, max 100 characters) Page 6 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: 5112510 -07 -Temple City -1 IV. Project Cost Estimate Please round all costs to the nearest hundreds. Once all costs are entered, click "Check Cost Estimate" to perform validation. Click it to check again each time when the costs have been revised. In some cases, the review committee may recommend that a project be funded providing certain components are removed from the project scope. Will the applicant proceed with the construction of the project if its scope and cost are reduced? yes SR2S Funds Local/Other Funds(6) Total Cost Preliminary Engineering(2) Environmental 1$0 1 Iso Iso PS&E 1$18,000 1 I $2,000 ( I $20,000 Right of Way Engineering Iso I Iso Iso Appraisals, Acquisitions 1$0 Iso Iso & Utilities Construction Engineering & Construction Construction Engineering(3) I $10,400 I J$1,100 I 1$11,500 Construction (1) 1$385,500 ( J$51,900 I 1$437,400 Public Outreach & Education and Minor Construction Improvements(4) Education, enforcement, and encouragement activities 1$18,000 I I $2,000 I I $20,000 Construction on school grounds Total Project Cost (5) I $431,900 I 1$57,000 I I $488,900 (1) For construction cost (including contingencies), provide a detailed Engineer's Estimate (use form provided on SR2S web site). (2) Total Cost of Preliminary Engineering may not exceed 25% of the Construction "Total Cost". (3) Total Cost of Construction Engineering may not exceed 15% of the Construction "Total Cost". (4) Total Cost of Public Outreach & Education and Minor Construction Improvements to Public School Grounds may not exceed 10% of the Construction "Total Cost". (5) SR2S funds may not exceed 90% of "Total Cost" or $450,000. (6) Local match (10% or more) to be included by phase of work. Check Cost Estimate Page 7 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2510-07-Temple City -i V. Project Schedule Estimated dates of completion for the major milestones shown below assuming the project is approved for funding on July 1, 2012. Refer to the SR2S Program Delivery Requirements in the Cycle 10 SR2S Guidelines. Please enter durations (in month) and estimated dates of completion will be calculated Page 8 of 12 December, 2011 Duration (Months) Estimated Date of Completion Target Project Approval Date: I 07/01/2012 Request Allocation of SR2S Funds: I 2 I ( 08/30/2012 Complete Environmental Document: I 2 I 10/29/2012 Obtain Right of Way Clearance: I 0 I I 10/29/2012 Award Construction Contract: I 1 I 11/28/2012 Complete Construction: I 3 I 02/27/2013 Project Close-out: I 2 I 04/28/2013 Page 8 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 VI. Evaluation Criteria The applicant's responses to the following questions will be used to evaluate the proposed project. Rating factors (RF) and the required statute in the Streets and Highways Code [SH] have been provided for each question. Scores from applicant responses to these questions will be totaled to yield the final score. The scoring rubrics have been posted on the SR2S web site. 1. Public participation and planning process that contributed to the development and selection of this proposed project. Describe how the target school(s) were selected and prioritized among potential SR2S projects in the local community or region. Describe how community priorities were identified and community input was gathered to guide the development of the project included in the proposal, and what measures were taken to ensure that community priorities are reflected in the proposal. Describe how the process secured the support of relevant stakeholders, and involved a public participation process that included a public meeting involving the public, schools, parents, teachers, local agencies, the business community, key professionals and other relevant parties. Cite the stakeholder names and organizations/agencies and describe their participation. (RF 6&7) [SH 2333.5(b)(6)] (Max. Pts 20) (limited to 3,000 characters). In November 2011, the City of Temple City conducted a Citywide Traffic Calming Master Plan workshop. The workshop brought together participants to learn about traffic calming and the traffic calming options in the City's toolbox, and to discuss what areas of the City would benefit most from traffic calming. Areas around schools were identified as very critical to these efforts. At this workshop, the City introduced and promoted Temple City's Safe Routes to School program, which makes walking and bicycling to school safe, easy, and enjoyable for the children of Temple City. The program is built around the nationally recognized model of the 5 E's: Engineering, Encouragement, Education, Enforcement, and Evaluation. Diverse community stakeholders were brought together to gather support for the program and to share concerns, interests and knowledge to make walking and bicycling to school safer and more attractive. The City's Safe Routes to School program is a citywide project targeting the following schools in and around the City: Longden Elementary School, Oak Avenue Intermediate School, Temple City High School, Emperor Elementary School, La Rosa Elementary School, Cloverly Elementary School, Cleminson Elementary School, First Lutheran School and Longley Way Elementary School. The following stakeholders were invited and participated in the workshop: community residents, local business owners, School Principals, PTA representatives, Local Law Enforcement, City Traffic Engineers, local pedestrian, bicycle and safety advocates, local planners, and school crossing guards. The School principals were provided maps of the surrounding schools and were asked to draw the most common routes children take to walk and bike to schools. Participants were invited to talk about concerns they identified including safety, health, traffic congestion, and the alarming decreasing trend in walking and biking to school. Temple City's Safe Routes to School Program will seek solutions to these issues through a combination of strategies including engineering, encouragement, education, and enforcement. Representatives of each school were asked what off site improvements can be made to help increase walking and biking to their schools. These problems and ideas were noted and summarized (see attached School Survey Feedback). Finally, participants discussed the next steps that needed to take place and established a working time line. 2. Identification of current and proposed walking and bicycling routes to school. Did the planning process develop into a school travel plan, safe routes to school plan, or school route plan? If yes, please describe briefly and attach a copy of the plan to this application. If no, please describe any future plans to develop one. (RF 5) [SH 2333.5(b)(5)] (Max Pts 5) (limited to 3,000 characters). The City currently has in place a Bicycle Master Plan which was approved by City Council on March 15, 2011 (see attached Bikeways Map). The Bicycle Plan includes a network of designated class I, II and III bikeways and additional safety improvements which links cyclists to schools, parks, transit hubs, the regional Rio Hondo Bike Trail and other key destinations. The City will also build off the momentum of its citywide Safe Routes to School program and create a future Safe Routes to School Plan. This plan will detail the methods and show the actions that the community and schools will target to increase walking and bicycling to school. The plan will help gather community support by establishing a Safe Routes to School task force, set priorities and publicize the findings generated by the program. The plan will incorporate education, encouragement, engineering and enforcement strategies, build a time schedule for each of these strategies, create a map of the area covered by the plan, and provide a method in which the program will be evaluated. The plan will help maintain the momentum of the program and sustain the program overtime while making walking and bicycling to school safer, easier, and more enjoyable. Page 9 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SKS10-07-Temple City -1 3. Existing Safety Hazards and Demonstrated Needs of the Applicant. Describe each safety risk/bazard that has been encountered at the project location when walking or bicycling to school and the extent and severity of each. Discuss how each item was determined to be a risk/hazard. (e.g. cite data such as accident reports, community observations, surveys, reports, walk or bicycle audits.) (RF 1&4) [SH 2333.5(b)(1)] (Max. Pts 30) (limited to 3,000 characters). General Conditions: Accident data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for years 2007, 2008 and 2009 demonstrate that a clear and apparent danger exists to Temple City pedestrians and bicyclists. 634 accidents occurred in the City during this time span. Of these accidents, 22 involved pedestrians causing injuries to 25 persons, 4 of whom were injured severely. During these three years, another 23 accidents involved bicyclists causing injuries to 22 persons. The following safety hazards exist in the area and are responsible for the dangerous conditions facing students who choose to walk and bike to school: sidewalk gaps, excessive speeds, and improper signage and striping. Sidewalk Gaps: Students are discouraged from walking to school where sidewalks are missing as this creates unsafe conditions for pedestrians exposing them to fast-moving vehicular traffic. Sidewalks provide a safe haven and refuge for pedestrians and help create clearly defined access routes to and from school. Furthermore, pedestrian facilities must be accessible and usable by all pedestrians, especially those with disabilities as well as children. During field assessments, five areas lacking sidewalks were identified as high risk and in need of improvements. These areas are located on identified safe routes to school in the proximity of Longden, Emperor, LaRosa, Cleverly and Cleminson Elementary Schools. There area total of 3,084 students enrolled at these five schools. Of this total, approximately 34 percent or 1,056 students walk or bike to school. Excessive Speeds: Excessive traffic speeds greatly increase the likelihood of pedestrians being hit and severely injured by motorists. Speed management is a significant priority in creating safe routes for children to walk and bike to school. Reduced speeds allow more opportunity for pedestrians and motorists to properly see and react to one another. On January 12, 2012, a radar speed survey was conducted which determined the 85th percentile speed driven by Temple City drivers. This survey demonstrates that excessive speed is an issue for streets surrounding local schools. Freer Street, which crosses Cleminson E.S., Pentland Street, which fronts La Rosa E.S., Longden Avenue, which fronts Longden E.S. have 85th percentile speeds of 33 mph, 34 mph and, 37 mph respectively. These are far too high and unacceptable relative to the 25 mph posted speed. Improper Signage and Striping: Many of the proposed school locations have signage and striping that is aged and fading or is lacking entirely. The visibility of children walking and biking to school is of the utmost importance. Proper delineation of signage and striping adds to a safe pedestrian friendly environment. Sources: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), field assessments, city recommendations, and school input were utilized to analyze safety hazards encountered at the project locations. 4. Potential of the Proposal for Reducing Child Injuries and Fatalities. Describe how the proposed project addresses each identified safety risk/hazard and how the project will improve bicycle and pedestrian safety and calm traffic. Explain why this proposed project is the best alternative for the situation. (RF 2) [SH 2333.5(b)(2)] (Max. Pts 30) (limited to 3,000 characters). Proposed Improvements: The following proposed improvements answer the demonstrated needs outlined above, and are pivotal in reducing child injuries and fatalities to create safe routes to Temple City schools. The City will install five foot wide sidewalks at various locations. Continuous sidewalks provide people with space to move safely within the public right-of-way that is separated from motor vehicles. By creating a protective buffer space, sidewalks significantly reduce pedestrian collisions with motorists. The City will also install speed feedback signs. These devices measure and display vehicle speed and caution speeding motorists. Due to the flashing lights of the feedback signs, motorists reduce their speeds near a crosswalk or a school. Another improvement consists of installing new traffic signs and crosswalk striping. Highly reflective and visible pedestrian crossing striping and signs increase the visibility of potential hazards to motorists, and thus increase compliance by drivers and ensure the safety of pedestrians. Furthermore, these improvements increase the use of crosswalks by pedestrians. The City also proposes to install ADA curb ramps. ADA ramps provide safe access between the sidewalks and roadway improving mobilityfor all including people using wheelchairs, strollers, handcarts and other similar devices. Solar Ped actuated lights and crosswalkwill be installed as part of the proposal. Highly visible flashing LED lights embedded along the crosswalk provide a dynamic visual cue to motorists that pedestrians are present. Flashing LED lights are especially helpful when weather conditions, darkness, or heavy traffic obscure the crosswalk and traffic speed requires early warning for adequate stopping distance. Finally, the City will install flashing beacon school speed limit signs. These signs create improved visibility and caution motorists of an approaching school or crosswalk. Alternatives Considered: The City has considered but ultimately decided against the following alternatives: Overhead beacons, bulb outs, advanced limit lines and raised crosswalks. Overhead beacons are not needed as traditional signage will be adequate to alert motorists. Ped volumes and existing roadway widths do not support installing bulb outs. Advanced limit lines are not Page 10 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 adequate at many Intersections where rolling stops and tast cornering are common. Finally, raised crosswalks in this case are not cost-effective and are problematic for emergency vehicles and street sweepers who commonly use these routes. 5. Potential of the Proposal for Encouraging Increased Walking and Bicycling Among Students. Describe how increased walking and bicycling among students will be encouraged and sustained after the project is completed. (e.g. partnership building, policy change, future funding, etc). Identify any specific education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation activities included in this project and attach anon-! nfrastructu reactivity worksheet, if applicable, to the application or explain any on-going efforts that support this project. (RF 3) [SH 2333.5(b)(3)] (Max. Pts 10) (limited to 3,000 characters). Infrastructure Improvements: The proposed infrastructure improvements will encourage walking and bicycling among students. Schoolchildren will be encouraged to walk and ride their bicycles to and from schools when they are provided with continuous sidewalks along the routes. In -pavement flashing lights on the crosswalks will give students a sense of security from potential conflicts with on -coming traffic. The improved signage and high -visibility striping provided at the school locations will also help create a safe haven for students who walk and bike to school. Temple City Safe Routes to School Program: Under Temple City's Safe Routes to School Program, the City will promote walking and biking to school by offering activities and events that are fun, safe and easy. For example, the City will collaborate with schools, parents, local businesses and local police to organize and promote a Walk to School Day event. Other fun activities will be planned such as a Walking School Bus, which invites adults to walk along with a group of children to school. The program will also encourage schools to organize contests between classes to make walking and biking to school fun and competitive. The program will provide funding for crossing guard training to ensure the safety of schoolchildren walking to school. 6. Benefit to one or more low-income schools. Describe how the project will benefit low-income school(s) and what portion of the project funds will be directed towards providing this benefit. (RF 7) [SH 2333.5(b)(7)] (Max. Pts 5) (limited to 3,000 characters). All schools located within Temple City will see marked improvements to the safety of students walking and biking to school as a result of the Temple City Safe Routes to School Program. Ranges from 22 %to 40 %of students enrolled at Temple City schools are eligible for the Free and Reduced Meals Program. In addition, the City invited low-income residents to community workshops, encouraging them to be fully engaged in the planning process of the proposed project. The following attachments are required: A. A general map showing the location of all proposed improvements and their proximity to the school and school routes. Note: The map should clearly identify the route that students take to school. B. A site plan for each improvement location showing existing and proposed conditions. C. Detailed Engineer's Estimate (Use form provided on SR2S web site) D. Applicable 'warrants'for projects with traffic control devices as required by California MUTCD (include Worksheet 4K-101 for Rapid Flashing Beacons at School Crossings) E. Non -Infrastructure Activity Worksheet, if applicable Photographs supplementing "A" and "B" above and letters of commitment and support from partners and advocacy groups are highly recommended. Page 11 of 12 December, 2011 Application ID: SR2S10-07-Temple City -1 VII. Application Signatures Local Agency Official (City Engineer or Public Works Director): The undersigned affirms that the statements contained in the application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge. Signature: 1 Date: Name (Last, First): 1Masura, Steven M. Phone: 1(626) 028-5217 Title: 1 Director of Community Development ( Email: Ismasura@templecity.us 1 School Official: The undersigned affirms that the school(s) benefited by this application is not on a school closure list that has been identified by the School District. Signature: Name (Last, First): 1Kang-Smith, Chelsea Title: 1 Superintendent, Temple City U.S.D. Person to Contact for Questions Name (Last First): lBryan Ariizumi Title: 1Public Safety Officer Date: 1 Phone: 1(626)548-5092 I 1 Email: Ickangsmith@tcusd.net 1 I Phone: 1(626)285-2171 I IEmail: lbariizumi@templecity.us I Caltrans District Traffic Operations Office Approval If the SR2S project application proposes improvements on a freeway or state highway that affects the safety or operations of the facility, it is required that the proposed improvements be reviewed by the district traffic operations office and either a letter of support from the traffic operations office be provided or the signature of the traffic personnel be secured below. Signature: 1 1 Date: Name (Last, First): ( Phone: 1 1 Title: 1 Email: 1 California Highway Patrol Approval If the SR2S project application proposes improvements on a freeway, state highway, or county road having California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement authority, a CHP Officer must must either write a letter of support or sign below to show support of the project Signature: Date: 1 1 Name (Lost, First): Phone: Title: 1 Email: 1 Local Law Enforcement Agency Approval If the SR2S project application proposes improvements that is outside of CHP enforcement authority, it is recommended that the local law enforcement agency write a letter of support or sign below to show support of the project. Signature: 1 Date: Name (Last First): 1 Phone: 1 Title: 1 Email: 1 Page 12 of 12 December, 2011 1. Letters of Support 2. Detailed Engineer's Estimate 3. Non -Infrastructure Activity Worksheet 4. School Survey Feedback 5. Safetrec Pedestrian and Bicycle Collision Map 6.Temple City Bikeways Map 7. Existing Conditions Map 8. Proposed Improvements Map 9. Photo Exhibit y4111 fill * imuoadmon 61 WimmYW111NIP1*111 W"W'', Temple City Unified School District "A District of High Achieving Schools" March 9, 2012 Kirk Cessna, Office Chief Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation, District 7 100 South Main Street, #12-420 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Hye Jung (Chelsea) Kang -Smith, Ed.D. Superintendent Board of Education Ken Knollenberg Robert S. Ridley Matt W. Smith Kien Tiet Joe Walker RE: Support for the City of Temple City's Safe Routes to School Project: Cycle 10 Program Dear Mr. Cessna: The Temple City Unified School District is concerned about the safety of children in our community. We wish to support the proposed Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Cycle 10 Program Application. This is a much needed program for our City. It is understood that the Safe Routes to School program will require a team of individuals to perform many tasks including an assessment of conditions and needs, designing Temple City's SR2S program, implementing educational and promotional events for our children and parents, and evaluating the outcome of our efforts. I am willing to dedicate our District's resources wherever possible, including staff hours, to the Safe Routes to School program. look forward to assisting in the Safe Routes to School program to increase the safety of our children, improve the physical and mental health of our children, and to potentially reduce traffic congestion near our schools. Therefore, I am in full support of Temple City's request for grant funding within the Cycle 10 Program. Sincerely, i Chelsea Kang -Smith, Ed. D. Superintendent Temple City Unified School District Everybody can be great because anybody can serve. You don't have to make your subject and verb agree to serve. You only need a heart full of grace, a soul generated by love." - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 970o Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA gi78o - 626-S48-5000 I No. I Item Description 10ak Av !nue Intermediate School ( Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amountl I CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Date 3/23/2012 Engineer's Preliminary Cost Estimate Job No. 12017 1 Safe Route to School Cycle 10 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 Various School Locations Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. No. I Item Description Qty Unit I Unit Price I Total Amount Longden Elementry School INSTALL ADA RAMPS AT XWALK AT OAK AND CAMINO REAL EAST 2 EA I $5,800 SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (ASSEMBLY C) WITH FLASHING AND WESTSIDES 1 3 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 $512 BEACON ON LONGDEN AVE FOR EB AND WBTRAFFIC ON OAK APPROACHING CAMINO REAL (NB AND SB DIRECTIONS) ZEBRA STRIPING WITH HIGHLY REFLECTIVE YELLOW PAINT AT PROVIDE ADVANCE SCHOOL SIGNAGE (ASSEMBLY A) FOR XWALK AT 2 EA $250.00 2 EXISTING CROSSWALKS AT PRIMROSE/LONGDEN, 29005F $4.25 $12,325 OAK/LONGDEN,TEMPLE CIN BLVD/LONGDEN AND PROVIDE 1 (RS -6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TO SCHOOL ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY D) ON LONGDEN FOR REPLACE NON-STANDARD EXISTING SIGN IN CROSSWALK AT OAK 1 SF $500.00 3 2 EA $250.00 $500 EB AND WB TRAFFIC YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALK AT OAK AND EMPEROR AT EAST AND 774 SF $4.25 $3,290 SCHOOL ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY A) ON PRIMROSE WEST LEG AND NORTH LEGS, OAK AND LEMON 4 2 EA $250.00 $500 $30,6021 APPROACHING WENDON FROM SB AND NB DIRECTIONS 5 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPED XWALK ON WENDON AT PRIMROSE FOR 290 SF $4.25 $1,233 WEST LEG (WL) ONLY (existing 2 -way stop controlled) INSTALL ADA RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES ON NWC AND SWC 6 2 EA $2,900.00 $5,800 FOR CROSSWALK WL OF WENDON AND PRIMROSE INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON PRIMROSE BETWEEN WENDON AND 7 280 LF $41.00 $11,480 FLAHERTY ON WESTSIDE INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON PRIMROSE BETWEEN FLAHERTY AND 8 340 LF $41.00 $13,940 GARIBALDI ON EASTSIDE Total of Section $63,7781 I No. I Item Description 10ak Av !nue Intermediate School ( Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amountl I Page 1 of 4 INSTALL POST MOUNTED SOLAR PED ACTUATED LIGHTS AND XWALK AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON OAK AVE 1 AT CAMINO REAL. (LED LIT ASSEMBLY B WITH DOWNWARD FACING 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 ARROW AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS — R62E(CA) FOR NB AND SB DIRECTIONS) — Met warrants for installation per Chapter 4N.02 OF THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) 2 INSTALL ADA RAMPS AT XWALK AT OAK AND CAMINO REAL EAST 2 EA $2,900.00 $5,800 AND WESTSIDES 3 STRIPE SLOW SCHOOL XING IN ADVANCE OF UNPROTECTED XWALK 160 SF $3.20 $512 ON OAK APPROACHING CAMINO REAL (NB AND SB DIRECTIONS) 4 PROVIDE ADVANCE SCHOOL SIGNAGE (ASSEMBLY A) FOR XWALK AT 2 EA $250.00 $500 OAK AND CAMINO REAL (NB AND SB DIRECTIONS) PROVIDE 1 (RS -6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TO 5 REPLACE NON-STANDARD EXISTING SIGN IN CROSSWALK AT OAK 1 SF $500.00 $500 AND EMPEROR EAST (NORTH LEG) 6 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALK AT OAK AND EMPEROR AT EAST AND 774 SF $4.25 $3,290 WEST LEG AND NORTH LEGS, OAK AND LEMON Total of Section $30,6021 Page 1 of 4 No. I Item Description ITemple City High School INSTALL POST MOUNTED SOLAR PED ACTUATED LIGHTS AND XWALK AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON LEMON AVENUE AT TRELAWNEY AVENUE. (LED LIT ASSEMBLY B WITH 1 DOWNWARD FACING ARROW AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS - R62E(CA) FOR EB AND WB DIRECTIONS) - Met warrants for installation per Chapter 4N.02 OF THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) INSTALL ADA RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AT XWALK AT 2 LEMON AND TRELAWNEY AVE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES 3 INSTALL ASSEMBLY C (SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS) ON LEMON APPROACHING SCHOOL FOR EB AND WB TRAFFIC INSTALL ASSEMBLY C (SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS) ON TEMPLE CITY 4 BOULEVARD BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND LEMON AVENUE FOR NB AND SB TRAFFIC YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALK AT LEMON AND TEMPLE CITY BLVD, EL 5 CAMINO REAL AND TEMPLE CITY BLVD AND SL OF LEMON ANC TRELAWNEY I No. I Item Description I Emperor Elementary School 1 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT EMPEROR AND ROSEMEAD BLVD 2 PROVIDE 1 (111-6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TC REPLACE NON-STANDARD EXISTING SIGN INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON EMPEROR 150' FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD ON 3 THE SOUTH SIDE AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 100' SOUTH OF ROSEMEAD BLVD ON THE WEST SIDE I 1 No. Item Description 1First Lutheran School 1 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT NOEL AND BROADWAY (NORTF LEG AND EAST LEG) ADA COMPLIANT RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES FOR EXISTINC 2 CROSSWALK AT NOEL AND BROADWAY EAST LEG INSTALL SOLAR LED FLASHING SCHOOL XING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY B 3 WITH DOWNWARD FACING ARROW AT UNPROTECTED CROSSWALP AT NOEL AND BROADWAY WITH HIGHLY REFLECTIVE RAISED RPM! ALONG CROSSWALK Page 2 of 4 I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amountl I 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 3 EA $2,900.00 $8,700 2 EA $250.00 $5001 2 EA $250.00 $500 1560 SF $425 $6,630 Total of Section $36,3301 1 Qty 1 Unit I Unit Price I Total Amountl I 1635 SF $4.25 $6,9491 1 EA $500.00 $5001 1360 LF $41.00 $55,760 Total of Secion $63,209 Qty I Unit 1 Unit Price 1 Total Amountl 640 SF $4.25 $2,7201 2 EA $2,900.00 $5,8001 1 EA $12,500.00 $12,500 Total of Section $21,0201 I No. I Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price I Total Amount I La RoSP Elementary School YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT ALESANDRO AND LA ROSA (NL 1 AND SL), ALESANDRO AT PENTLAND (NL AND WL), FRATUS AND LA 1980 SF $4.25 $8,415 ROSA (EL), FRATUS AND KENNERLY (EL) AND PENTLAND AND FRATUS (SL) ADA COMPLIANT RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES FOR EXISTING CROSSWALKS AT ALESANDRO AT PENTLAND (NWC), AT FRATUS AND 2 5 EA $2,900.00 $14,500 KENNERLY (NEC AND SEC) AND FRATUS AND PENTLAND (SWC ANS SEC) INSTALL SCHOOL CROSSING SIGNS (ASSEMBLY B WITH DOWNWARD 3 FACING ARROW) AT UNPROTECTED CROSSWALK AT LA ROSA AND 2 EA $400.00 $800 ALESANDRO (WL) WITH HIGHLY REFLECTIVE RAISED YELLOW RPMS ALONG EXISTING CROSSWALK PROVIDE 1 (R1-6) IN STREET SCHOOL CHILDREN CROSSING SIGN TO 4 REPLACE NON-STANDARD EXISTING SIGN IN CROSSWALK AT LA ROSA 1 EA $500.00 $500 AND ALESANDRO (NORTH LEG) INSTALL ASSEMBLY C (SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS) ON LA ROSA 5 APPROACHING SCHOOL FOR EB AND WB TRAFFIC AND ON PENTLAND 4 EA $250.00 $1,000 ST BETWEEN ALESANDRO AND FRATUS INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON PENTLAND ON SS BETWEEN SCHOOL AND 6 ENCINITA AVE, ON FRATUS ON EAST SIDE FROM LA ROSA TO 445 LF $41.00 $18,245 PENTLAND Total of Section $43,4601 No. I Item Description I Qty I Unit I Unit Price I Total Amount) Itloverh• Elementary School I YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT CLOVERLY AND BROADWAY, 1 CLOVERLY AT DAINES (WL) AND CLOVERLY AT OLIVE AND NL OF 2780 SF $4.25 $11,815 BLACKLEY AND CLOVERLY INSTALL SOLAR LED SCHOOL SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED FEEDBACK 2 SIGNS ALONG BROADWAY APPROACHING SCHOOL FOR EB AND WE 2 EA $11,000.00 $22,000 DIRECTIONS 3 STRIPE EXISTING UNPROTECTED CROSSWALK AT CLOVERLY AND 270 SF $4.25 $1,1481 BLACKLEY YELLOW ZEBRA 4 INSTALL SCHOOL CROSSING (ASSEMBLY B) WITH DOWNWARD 2 EA $500.00 $1,0001 FACING ARROW AT CLOVERLY AND BLACKELY 5 INSTALL SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT SIGNS (ASSEMBLY C) ON CLOVERLY 1 EA $40000 $400 FOR NB DIR WITH SLOW SCHOOL LEGENDS 6 INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON CLOVERLY BETWEEN OLIVE AND BLACKLEY 470 LF $41.00 $19,270 ON EAST SIDE 7 ADD ADA RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES AT NEC OF CLOVERLY 1 EA $2,900.00 $2,900 AND BLACKLEY Total of Section $58,5331 Page 3 of 4 I No. I Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price I Total Amount ICleminson Elementary School AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON LIVE OAK 1 YELLOW ZEBRA STRIPE XWALKS AT DALEVIEW AND FREER (WL AND 1160 SF $4.25 $4,930 SL), DALEVIEW AND ARROWOOD (WL), DALEVIEW AND GRAND (NL) THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) 2 INSTALL SCHOOL AHEAD (ASSEMBLY D) ON DALEVIEW FOR NB 3 EA $250.00 $750 EDGE OF CROSSWALK AT LIVE OAK AND WARREN DIRECTION AND ON FREER ST FOR EB AND WB DIRECTIONS Total of Section 3 INSTALL STOP AND STOP BAR FOR WL AT DALEVIEW AND 42 SF $3.00 $1261 1 Public Convenience & Safety ARROWOOD Sub -total of Construction $397,6761 INSTALL SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 25 (ASSEMBLY C) ON DALEVIEW FOR $39,7681 Total Construction ( 4 2 EA $250.00 $5001 BOTH NB AND SB DIRECTIONS INSTALL 5' SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF DALEVIEW BETWEEN GRAND 5 AND FREER, ON THE WEST SIDE OF DALEVIEW BETWEEN SCHOOL 940 LF $41.00 $38,540 AND ARROWOOD AND ARROWOOD TO GRAND AVENUE. Total of Section $44,8461 No. Item Description Qty I Unit Unit Price Total Amount Longley Way Elementary School INSTALL POST MOUNTED SOLAR PED ACTUATED LIGHTS AND XWALK AT EXISTING MIDBLOCK UNPROTECTED CROSSSWALK ON LIVE OAK 1 AND WARREN (LED LIT ASSEMBLY B WITH DOWNWARD FACING 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000 ARROW AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS — R62E(CA) FOR EB AND WB DIRECTIONS) — Met warrants for installation per Chapter 4L.02 OF THE CAMUTCD. (Verified with in field ped count) 2 INSTALL ADA RAMPS WITH TRUNCATED DOMES FOR SOUTHERN 1 EA $2,900.00 $2,900 EDGE OF CROSSWALK AT LIVE OAK AND WARREN Total of Section $22,9001 Pemits, Bonds, Licenses & Insurance $8,0001 1 Public Convenience & Safety $5,0001 Sub -total of Construction $397,6761 110 Percent Contigency $39,7681 Total Construction ( $437,4441 1 TOTAL 1 $437,4441 Page 4 of 4 -2: 0R f /{■_ . ) , ®- _cl l�aa a q - - &J \ \ } \\ \ 0R /{■_ _ ) , ®- _cl l�aa a q - - &J ) { _cl \wa \ 7 \ \ . \ \ �\� co \ \/\ 0 s p 6 m a WE �rilNU mPw w'� in YD Zen > ¢m xmxam m d - W - - U uNiHm�IF Y `. Y }d cm3 �90 � N _ m m > N N u E v mm a` w__ � pmi l-Ym�m�'.O r�cY Jin Yuni9 OZ Z wK6�--N � 0 rn 0 0 N O O N U) O O V L W Z vJ O ;^ O U m U U_ m L O m L- 4-1 4--1 U) W n U, W CD F— W cc o 44, n m 0 tM Y43S0tt m m , ..................... 1 i � w ®Q51£�1. 0 4•t 5 s , a Cleminson Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT CLEMINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K thru 6`" Grade) 399 Students }� 1ti, `t \S 2,751 jl) 1 Existing Safe Route to School • • • -All-Way Stop Control - Two -Way Stop Control Signal Accidents 411 Posted 25 mph/ 80, speed 33 nips'— � � 1 Freer Street: Farago • y y � Approx. 40% of students walk to/from school using SRTS 5rh% is 3f,mph OIL. routes ith 624 ACit 1 I • •id fl i, �l iL • �d yh� Posted 30 mph,l, 44 ` 5"h %speed is 3�' m T ,kph Parking permitted on both sides 500 fc t 106 m • Residential land use Existing Conditions: Freer Street: Farago • Posted speed of 25 mph at Freer St and Daleview Ave to McClintock • 85`h Percentile speed is higher than posted speed at 33 mph Ave on Freer St • 2,758 ADT on Freer St • 1 lane each direction • Parking permitted on both sides • Residential land use Daleview Avenue: Freer • Fronting school site Street to Grand Ave • Heavy street parking on both sides • Parents double parkto pick up students • No posted speed limit • No existing school signage • No sidewalks on east side or south of school between school grounds and Grand Avenue • Parents and students are walking in street around parked cars • Principal indicated Daleview to Grand heaviest travel path for parents and students • ADT on Daleview 624 • Residential Land Use Grand Avenue: • Posted 30 mph McClintock to Santa • ADT of 1,949 East of Daleview Anita Ave • No sidewalks on either side • Most traveled route to Cleminson EI • Parking allowed on both sides • Residential land use 3 Year Accident Summary Near Cleminson Elementary School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 1. Daleview/Grand 60'N 08/26/08 25:00 Tu Sideswipe PDO 2. Grand/McClintock 1 09/09/08 13:15 Tu Head -On PDO Factor SB Veh hit parked Veh WB Veh hit EB Veh PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS N -Cl AT CLEMINSON ELEMENTARY SPEED SCHOOL fr Sao-1{CA) "MT 25 ,0114 J } Install SR4-1(CA) For NB And SB Directions On Daleview Ave AHEAD Install SW24-3(CA) For EB And WB Directions On Freer St 0 , i Yid SW24-3(CA) AHEAD o Install SW24-3(CA) For NB Direction On • Daleview Ave G Install STOP and stop bar for EB traffic at Arrowood at Daleview Install 5' Wide Sidewalks Along Install Yellow Crosswalks With Daleview Avenue With ADA Diagonal Or Zebra Striping at Ramps At Intersections Existing Stop Controlled Intersections • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAM UTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' PHOTO EXHIBIT CLEMINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Sidewalks on the east and west sides of the street are missing double park to pick up their children. Looking south on Daleview Avenue north of Grand Avenue. School Looking north at intersection of Daleview Avenue and Arrowood children and parents are exposed to motor traffic as they walk on Street. The intersection lacks crosswalk striping and Stop Legend the road due to a lack of sidewalks. and Stop Bar. Looking north on Daleview Avenue north of Grand Avenue. The street lacks proper CAMUTCD signs including 25 MPH School Speed Limit and School Ahead Signs. Looking west at intersection of Grand Avenue and Daleview Avenue. The intersection lacks crosswalk striping. Cloverly Elementary School Existing Conditions: Broadway: Temple City Blvd to Cloverly Cloverly: Broadway to Blackley 3 Year Accident Summary Near Cloverly School Location Dist. 1. Broadway/Alessandro 2. Broadway/Temple City Blvd Considered a Secondary Arterial 1 lane each direction Residential land use No Left turns posted for WB traffic along Broadway 1 lane each direction Street parking on both sides Residential Land Use No posted speed limit No Sidewalks School parking and drop off on Cloverly Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 03/07/10 14:35 Su Head -On ]NJ 1 06/21/09 20:52 Su Rearend PDO tactor EB LT Veh hit WB Thru Veh EB Veh hit EB Veh - Existing Safe Route to School + + EXISTING CONDITIONS AT All -Way Stop Control CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (4th thru 6" Grade) - Two -Way Stop Control 447 Students Signal - Accidents m Posted35mph-25 � --- a S? I SY,' r eoa',�- mph at school i Wedgewood i + 5,597 ADT --_ _ • - G '_���•-�'+� aExisting Posted School _ • 25 mph on Broadwaav,ine U St= - 4 �� ay, •Band WB - 3 I + i 6R.a • Nad'i Si wa •rz O � Existin Schoo q �- ... • • • • � g I and T m i=� + •} Bicycle Signs '- a A Nonconforming to �q — Unprotected it-'� CAMUTCD for NB Dir D 'Blackley. St' Malk (WL) with N No Si na a at Malk at o _ - y __ (Cloverly/Blackley) _ ---__ _ @ Existing Conditions: Broadway: Temple City Blvd to Cloverly Cloverly: Broadway to Blackley 3 Year Accident Summary Near Cloverly School Location Dist. 1. Broadway/Alessandro 2. Broadway/Temple City Blvd Considered a Secondary Arterial 1 lane each direction Residential land use No Left turns posted for WB traffic along Broadway 1 lane each direction Street parking on both sides Residential Land Use No posted speed limit No Sidewalks School parking and drop off on Cloverly Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 03/07/10 14:35 Su Head -On ]NJ 1 06/21/09 20:52 Su Rearend PDO tactor EB LT Veh hit WB Thru Veh EB Veh hit EB Veh 3 Year Accident Summary Cont Near Cloverly School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 3. Cloverly/Broadway 170'5 10/08/09 14:55 Th Veh/Bike INJ EB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Bike (12 yrs) 4. Broadway/Cloverly 13'E 01/31/08 23:10 Th Broadside PDO EB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Veh S. Cloverly/Daines 60'S 06/03/08 15:00 Tu Hit Object PDO SB Thru Veh hit Obj Install 5' Sidewalk along Cleverly between Olive and Blackley Install SR4-1(CA) Assembly -on Cleverly approaching School for NB Direction ,.I�.gQ'd1i SPEED SR4-1(CA) LIMIT 25G".W cmmnm W MUNI Install ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes at NEC of Cleverly and Blackley • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas" Install SR4-1(CA) Assembly C with LED Speed Feedback Signs along Broadway approaching School for EB and WB Directions Assembly B Assembly C 1. Speed Feedback Sign CALIF mustsay WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT PHOTO EXHIBIT CLOVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Broadway Avenue looking west approaching Cloverly Avenue. Broadway Avenue and Cloverly Avenue intersection looking Location requires Speed Feedback sign due to motorists' excessive southeast. The intersection lacks proper striping. Zebra striping is Cloverly Avenue north of Blackley Street looking south. Sidewalks are lacking on the west side of the street causing hazardous Blackley Street and Cloverly Avenue intersection. This unprotected crosswalk lacks yellow striping and proper signage. Cloverly Avenue north of Olive Street looking north on east side Cloverly Avenue north of Olive Street looking north on east side approaching school. Many of the signs are faded and aging in need approaching school. Many of the signs are faded and aging in need of replacement. There Is no posted speed limit. of replacement. Emperor Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT EMPEROR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K thru 6ch Grade) 665 Students R11 st Existing Safe Route to School All -Way Stop Control Two -Way Stop Control Signal 0 - Accidents _Yaun9aale_-Lan•,-- ii i C: -_ -- cadno [leal • n �� •s•• N � -- 9 7e----CailtLa•Li • Posted 25 mpd - ms- •• w • N b, o ', i Y q • G 1 1 c � • � f!f m • l 3 Year Accident Summary Near Emperor Elementary School Temple City Data On y Location • Time - - Collision 6,426 ADT Longden Ave i Existing Conditions: Type Muscatel Ave: Emperor • 1 lane each direction to Callita St • Residential land use Rosemead/Emperor • Students use Intersection of Muscatel and Emperor to Cross • Heavy parking in front of school 2. • Narrow Th • Sidewalks on Westside only Rosemead/Emperor • Part not in Temple City Emperor Ave: Muscatel • Posted 25 mph to Rosemead Blvd • Street parking on both sides M • Residential Rosemead/Emperor • Parents and students are walking in street around parked CA rs • Only part of South side within Temple City limits 3 Year Accident Summary Near Emperor Elementary School Temple City Data On y Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Type 1. 03/12/10 13:00 Fr Broadside Fatal Rosemead/Emperor 2. 1 08/14/08 17:55 Th Broadside PDO Rosemead/Emperor 3. 1 10/20/08 18:00 M Auto/Ped INJ Rosemead/Emperor Factor EB left turn Veh hit NB Thru Veh WB LFT Veh hit NB Thru Veh WB Thru Veh hit SB Ped in xwalk Install Yellow Crosswalks With '1 1 s, _toControlled . . rsections 0.ErnperyorEla��`�` km Ramps At Intersection 41* ``.. %!S tip "Longden -Ave - - .- PHOTO EXHIBIT EMPEROR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL .iosemead Boulevard south of Emperor Avenue looking north. Rosemead Boulevard is a busy arterial with high traffic volumes. Looking south at intersection of Rosemead Boulevard and Emperor Avenue. Missing sidewalks hamper pedestrian mobility. Emperor Avenue west of Rosemead Boulevard looking west. Looking west at intersection of Emperor Avenue and Muscatel Parents and students walk in street around parked cars. Avenue. The street experiences heavy parking in front of school. First Lutheran School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL Existing Safe Route to School • + - All -Way Stop Control - Two -Way Stop Control Signal Accidents I4 1 F KlatkmanAve i, I Faits—�L I i9 )zi_ Piltl'IYILSt gg — 0akAv =--_ 4'I -Live. Unprotected NS Existing Advance School n`SSchool XWalk Signage - both directions�- u�0 (EW) with SLOW SCHOOL III�4� cc -� XING pavement legends V i j it 1' roadway - •. - - ¢ 11 101242ADT Poste I35mph _-03t1te5r td t e 100 m -_--"Ran�hrvRo>Call ' c't ' Existing Conditions: Broadway: Noel to + 2 lanes each direction Encinita Ave • Residential land use + Fast Moving Traffic on Broadway + Sidewalks on both sides 3 Year Accident Summary Near First Lutheran School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Broadway/Encinita 1 01/04/09 20:45 Su Sideswipe PDO WB Left hit EB Thru Veh 2. Broadway/Encinita 1 02/02/09 15:50 M Broadside INJ NB Thru Veh hit WB Thru Veh 3. Broadway/Loma 10'W 03/17/09 07:35 Tu Backing PDO WB Backing hit parked WB Veh 4. Broadway/Sultana 19'E 02/21/09 08:00 Sa Sideswipe PDO WB Parking Veh hit another parked Veh 5. Broadway/Sultana 1 07/23/08 10:55 We Rearend PDO WB Thru Veh hit WB Speed ThruVeh 6. Broadway/Sultana 1 10/06/08 08:05 M Broadside INJ SB Right turn Veh hit Veh/Bike WB Bike 7. Broadway/Encinita 1 10/23/07 08:30 Tu Veh/Ped INJ EB LT Veh hit NB Ped in Xwalk 8. Broadway/Encinita 1 "12/13/07 19:10 Th Broadside INJ NB Thru Veh hit EB Thru Veh Location Dist. Date 9. Broadway/Noel 8'W 04/21/07 10. 1 10/18/07 Broadway/Sultana 11. 1 12/19/07 Broadway/Sultana PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL Time Day Collision Severity Type 12:29 Sa Rearend PDO Speed 16:20 Th Wrong INJ Side 15:00 W Wrong INJ Side Factor EB Thru Veh hit EB LFT Veh NB RT Veh hit WB Thru Veh SB RT Veh hit EB Thru Veh Install Solar LED Flashing Assembly Bfor unprotected Xwalk in East Leg at Broadway and Noel with Yellow Zebra Striped Paint for North and East legs with Reflective Raised REM's for Xwalk in East leg. Includes ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes for NWC, NEC and SEC. 'L a 11, 1 1!1, RijrAi r,r LA J b4 URSAW W) Flashing Yellow Beacon at School Ciussinqs SATISFIED YES 1— No r-, (AH Pals Mist Hp Sntsfwd) P,,F,, A ES al AND Pat B �LnSFIEC XV16 :r i AND Pan C I .Tl uni "Alm E il W it PHOTO EXHIBIT FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL Broadway Avenue east of Noel Drive looking west on north side of Broadway Avenue west of Noel Drive looking east on north side of street. Due to fast moving traffic on Broadway Avenue, this site is street. This street experiences heavy traffic volumes which poses a very prone to accidents. safety risk to students walking from First Lutheran School. Intersection of Broadway Avenue and Noel Drive looking east. The Broadway Avenue east of Noel Drive looking west. The intersection crosswalks lack zebra striping and are not adequately visible for will benefit from a flashing beacon to warn approaching traffic at crossing traffic. this unprotected crosswalk. La Rosa Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT LA ROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Kthru3RD Grade) 582 Students Existing Advance Ped Xing Sign with SLOW SCHOOLXING on La Rosa for EB MUTCD) Existing Conditions Posted 25 mph/ 85`h speed 34mph _ •a ._ 1,5DOADT j 85`h%32mpN Street �, � ;n (Non- ce to Non-ceto CA 1. La Rosa: Allesandro to Fratus Existing Safe Route to School - All -Way Stop Control 49 - Two -Way Stop Control le Signal 0 - Accidents Existing Advance Ped Xing Sign with SLOW SCHOOL for RING on LaR sa for WB +P Unprotected School Malik (WL) No Signage at XWalk (La Rosa/Allesandro S 2'. test. 5U m 85h Percentile speed is high at 32 mph in front of school 1 lane each direction Heavy Parking on South Side, limited to 10 min on north side Residential land use During school pick up parked cars obscure xwalk With parking street is very narrow Bus also parks on La Rosa to pick up students 85"' Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school Parents stack along Pentland to pick up kids in valet line Street parking on both sides Residential Land Use No posted speed limit No posted speed Heavyvehicle trafficfrom parents waiting to pick up kids Residential parking allowed on east side 3 min parking zone on west side Smaller buses wait for kids Pentland: Allesandro to Fratus Allesandro: La Rosa to Pentland Existing Safe Route to School - All -Way Stop Control 49 - Two -Way Stop Control le Signal 0 - Accidents Existing Advance Ped Xing Sign with SLOW SCHOOL for RING on LaR sa for WB +P Unprotected School Malik (WL) No Signage at XWalk (La Rosa/Allesandro S 2'. test. 5U m 85h Percentile speed is high at 32 mph in front of school 1 lane each direction Heavy Parking on South Side, limited to 10 min on north side Residential land use During school pick up parked cars obscure xwalk With parking street is very narrow Bus also parks on La Rosa to pick up students 85"' Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school Parents stack along Pentland to pick up kids in valet line Street parking on both sides Residential Land Use No posted speed limit No posted speed Heavyvehicle trafficfrom parents waiting to pick up kids Residential parking allowed on east side 3 min parking zone on west side Smaller buses wait for kids 3 Year Accident Summary Near La Rosa Elementary Sc cool Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Pentland/Encinita 69'E 10/24/09 23:25 Sa Hit Obj INJ EB Left Turn hit Obj 2. Pentland/Fratus 196' 04/16/09 08:20 Th Sideswipe PDO EB Thru Veh Hit EB E Thru Veh 3. Pentland/Fratus I 08/31/08 20:55 Su Rearend PDO WB Thru Veh Hit Speed Parked WB Veh 4. Pentland/Encinita 12'E 03/19/08 21:10 We Sideswipe PDO WB RT Veh hit WB Veh sceoai SPEED LIMIT 25 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT 1 approaching Allesandro 5CHOi7L LA ROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Install 5' Sidewalk along Fratus and Pentland Install Yellow Crosswalks With Diagonal Or Zebra Striping. at Existing Stop/Signal Controlled S,23-`,1f'Ql4 ) Intersections 0 Install SR4-1(CA) AssemblyC -on LaRosa. approaching Allesandro 5CHOi7L for WB and at Rio Hondo for EB traffic SPEED 9R4-1{CA) LIMIT To Install SR4-1(cA) }� 5 Assembly -on rx.r /�►r Pentland for bothauuwru AhE Fh_S1111 approaches to the school ---- Install ADA Compliant Ramps with Truncated Domes at Alesandro at Pentland (NWC), Fratus at Kennerly (NEC and SEC) and Fratus and Pentland (SWC and SEC) All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas" Assembly B Provide 1111-6 sign to replace non conforming sign Loneden Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT LONGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (K thru 6`h Grade) 991 Students - Existing Safe Route to School All -Way Stop Control 19 Two -Way Stop Control 10 - Signal - Accidents 1 olema St - - - Posted 25 rgph/ 85`h 111 --� _ 1 l 7,141 ADT speed 37 m 1`r _ Xing Guard ••.I;PC I �1 gderi Xing Guard yLr J/ t�y�iriE �� G O j� -�.O�C t•• n O +`} '.642AD i Ave N I it � i l � i 4 �i. i, cnnra�r �anmBY Existing Conditions: Longden Ave: Temple • 85`h Percentile speed is high at 37 mph nearthe school City Blvd to Oak Ave • 7,141 ADT on Longden Ave • 1 lane each direction • Parking permitted on north side • 1 school sign for WB dir • Residential land use • During school pick up EB dir is blocked by parents • Very narrow • Heavy pedestrian usage on south side at school pick up Oak Ave: Longden to • 85`h Percentile speed is high at 34 mph near the school Garibaldi Ave • Posted 30 mph • Street parking on both sides • Parents and students are walking in street around parked cars • Residential Land Use Primrose: Longden to • No posted speed Garibaldi • Heavy vehicle traffic • No sidewalks on either side • Parents pick up kids on Wendon Street use Primrose as loop • Residential parking allowed on both sides makes narrow streets 0 Residential land use 3 Year Accident Summary Near Longden Eleme ttary School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Type l.Longden/Oak 292' 3/4/10 14:37 Th Veh/Ped INJ 7.Longden/Oak 1 3/26/08 09:00 We Sideswipe PDO B. Longden/Primrose 242' 2/22/08 08:20 Fr Veh/Ped INJ W 9. Longden/Primrose 1 E 18:30 Tu Speed PDO 2. Oak/Longden 342' 2/26/10 18:22 Rearend Fr Sideswipe PDO 6/16/08 15:20 5 Broadside PDO Longden/Primrose W 3. Garibaldi/Oak 1 11/6/09 07:30 11. Longden/TCB Fr Veh/Bike PDO 4. Longden/Temple 1 10/29/09 11:55 1 Th Speed PDO City Blvd (TCB) Primrose/Garibaldi Rearend S. TCB/Longden 1 8/2/09 15:10 00:52 Su Broadside PDO 6. TCB/Longden 1 8/23/09 19:34 Su Broadside INJ 7.Longden/Oak 1 3/26/08 09:00 We Sideswipe PDO B. Longden/Primrose 242' 2/22/08 08:20 Fr Veh/Ped INJ W 9. Longden/Primrose 1 5/13/08 18:30 Tu Speed PDO Rearend 10. 108' 6/16/08 15:20 Mo Broadside PDO Longden/Primrose W 11. Longden/TCB 45'W 2/6/08 22:40 We Sideswipe PDO 12. 1 1/15/08 12:15 Tu Veh/Ped INJ Primrose/Garibaldi 13. 500' 6/21/08 00:52 Sa Hit Obj PDO Primrose/Longden S Factor WB Veh hit NB ped (8 yrs old) SB thru Veh hit SB thru Veh EB RT Veh hit NB Bike EB Thru Veh hit EB Thru Veh WB Thru Veh hit NB Thru Veh WB Thru Veh hit NB Thru Veh EB Thru Veh hit EB thru Veh WB Thru Veh hit Ped crossing SB (12 yrs old) EB Thru Veh hit EB Thru Veh NB Thru Veh hit WB thru Veh EB thru Veh hit WB Thru Veh SB Veh hit EB Ped (15 yrs old) NB Veh hit parked SB Veh PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT LONGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SW24-3(CA) AHEAD ni swza-ticA> Install swza-1ICA -- - Assembly For NB and 20 SB Directions On Primrose Ave Install ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes on NWC Assembly C and SWC of Crosswalk at Wendon and Primrose 25 mph Flashing Beacon On Longden Ave for EB and WB • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 "Traffic Control for School Areas' PHOTO EXHIBIT LOWDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Longden Avenue east of Oak Avenue looking east. Carsblockthe eastbound direction of Longden Avenue as school children are let out from school. here is very narrow. There is heavy pedestrian usage on the south Primrose Avenue at Flaherty Street looking north. There are no sidewalks on either side of the street and the corner requires an ADA ramp to improve accessibility. Primrose Avenue at Wendon Street looking west. Parentspickup kids on Wendon Street and use Primrose Avenue as loop. Residential parking on both sides makes the street narrow. Lonelev Wav Elementary School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT LONGLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Kthru 5'" Grade) 525 Students 779 ADT ,Altos Ave -- —warren Way. ;E6 — } - "-'-'R'asted 25 rgp 00' -- -_-� --i 22,098 ADT Posted 40 mph - Existing Safe Route to School - All -Way Stop Control -Two-Way Stop Control Signal Accidents x 4aYsi 7i z W -Woodruff Ave" —__ W Sandra -Ave- -Las -Tunas --Dr- una_Dr-_ - tasJunas�r _ r--""—"-- �• -�� Existing Advance o +"� • ^' m Ped Xing Sign with - d y SCHOOLXING • v legends -bath dir- a �� - ?e_ -- a Unprotected White School >. Live 6,845 ADT XWalk (EL) s = 85`h %v41 mph, 35 mph posted speed No Sienaae at XWalk (Live Oak prose St and Warren) has a XingGuard w during school hours Existing Conditions: Live Oak: Gilpin Way to • 86' Percentile speed is high at 41 mph - posted speed is 35 Warren Way , mph • 1 lane each direction • Heavy Parking on both sides - Restricts sight Visibility of XWalk • Residential land use • During school pick up parked cars obscure xwalk • No sidewalks on NS of Live Oak CAMUTCD Guidelines for In -Roadway Lights Section 4N.02 For NS Existing Crosswalk at Warren and Live Oak The location of the In -Roadway Warning Lights within the lanes should be based on engineering judgment. Standard: In -Roadway Warning Lights (IRWLs) shall not be placed on or within the crosswalk markings. If the In -Roadway Warning Lights are activated by a push button, the PUSH BUTTON FOR PEDESTRIAN WARNING LIGHTS, CROSS WITH CAUTION (R62E(CA)) sign shall be used. The following shall be considered when evaluating the need for In -Roadway Warning Lights: a. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled. (uncontrolled) b. An engineering traffic study to determine if In -Roadway Warning Lights are compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may or may not be, controlled by traffic signals or STOPNIELD signs. (Existing Unprotected Xwalk, lights will increase awareness and safety) c. Standard traffic signs for crossings and crosswalk pavement markings are provided. (will be provided as proposed) d. At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period. (met) e. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak -hour pedestrian usage. (met) f. The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 kmlh (45 mph) or less. (Speed is 41135 mph) g. In -Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight distance for the posted speed limit. (met) h. Public education on In -Roadway Warning Lights is conducted for new installations. (Will be provided as proposed) .aH.li f il:Ai r0d.1 4 a_on -,1 jrI r,0 t.+ - - 41-2- JCUN'DATE _ �41_C DATE Uj d E PM CHK 1,1 [yak Avg 51 ve. M nu 51. i/YIY rT /1 /Al/A 41en 1u o -U 1:�' �I" Gp[nl Lnmmrnnrnl v.m_l nn maln.�YI: K-vh lUtl mrN U � RURAL (R) in Ml9 ip}area o•r_olatcd uIXPfnwNly UI�+U,W'J e�p.�lalaur... (� URBAN (U) Flashing Yellow Beacon at School crossings SATISFIED YES NO 0 (All Pans Must Be Satisfied) \y ld,k UrIJM REQUIREMENTS Ol 0' nn Paf[A U R11911 �u+.lv V.,.�+., eN41 nn lar. ��II�l l YE3I ND❑IGv�+I ..m#Mr„o PsnH.- e.�.a+y E;ft r I 4” SATISFIED $Irael a AND Part B Gci�lAl:pe.dch 3perJ E"eecs 55 kl"I"35 mv111 SATISFIED YES NO L AND Part C I:Ne+.•ro,l ConwIlnJ Cl uastliy Nau Thel IaG anrA+niawvl' SATISFIED YES Ip NO ❑ 5QmUL%(late-Al—. �- PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT LONGLEY WAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL N Install Solar Ped Actuated Xwalk and Flashing Assembly B for unprotected Xwalk in East Leg at Warren and Live Oak along with ADA ramps with Truncated Domes for South leg of Xwalk i LEI m All proposed improvements are ID ID .4— limited within Temple City Limits _y �► m I➢ m m • All proposed school area improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 `Traffic Control for School Areas" and Chapter 4N —In Roadway Lights l PHOTO EXHIBIT LONGLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Warren Way looking south at Las Tunas Drive. Las Tunas Drive is a Longley Way looking north. Heavy parking on both sides of the heavily traveled arterial with vehicles traveling at a high speed Warren Way looking south at Las Tunas Drive. During school pick Warren Way looking north. The surrounding land use is residential. up, parked cars obscure the crosswalk. Oak Intermediate School - Existing Safe Route to School • • • * EXISTING CONDITIONS AT OAK - All -Way Stop Control INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL (7h Thru 8" Grade) - Two -Way Stop Control 951 Students - Signal - Accidents a> Pr�Q�da�e r' � - i CaT inu —. ••• r y�it 7Y Unprotected EW Xwalk (SL) No Vehicles wait on Camino•� Existing Signage at Xwalk (ped RQay n count conducted) Real — both sides to wait Xnp • • • s E to pick up students .• -C�.�• • '.., c rn RQa� v 1101 Existing Conditions • 'gip Ca a e� m m pve School EW Xwalk — heavily used — Crossing guard in afternoon Emperor Ave provides access to Temple City High School Baseball/Soccer ect. fields. Parents/Students park and or walk in to watch the games after school hours — park at Oak School 250 fee' Oak Avenue: EI Camino • 85" Percentile speed is high at 33 mph near the school Real to Lemon Avenue • Posted 25 mph approaching school • Posted 30 mph for SB traffic S/0 Emperor • 1,767 ADT on Oak Ave • 1 lane each direction • Parking permitted on both side south of Emperor • No existing Ped Xing Signs at Unprotected Xwalk • Cars are picking up speed traveling NB as they cross Camino Real • Residential land use • No sidewalks north of EI Camino Real CAMUTCD Guidelines for In -Roadway Lights Section 4N.02 The location of the hi -Roadway Warning Lights within the lanes should be based on engineering judgment. Standard: In -Roadway Warning Lights (IRWLs) shall not be placed on or within the crosswalk markings. If the In -Roadway Warning Lights are activated by a push button, the PUSH BUTTON FOR PEDESTRIAN WARNING LIGHTS, CROSS WITH CAUTION (R62E(CA)) sign shall be used. The following shall be considered when evaluating the need for In -Roadway Warning Lights: a. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled. b. An engineering traffic study to determine if In -Roadway Warning Lights are compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may or may not be, controlled by traffic signals or STOP/YIELD signs. (Existing unprotected xwalk, lights will increase awareness and safety) c. Standard traffic signs for crossings and crosswalk pavement markings are provided. (will be provided as proposed) d. At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period. (met) e. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak -hour pedestrian usage. (met) f. The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 km/h (45 mph) or less. (speed is 33 mph) g. In -Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight distance for the posted speed limit. (met) h. Public education on In -Roadway Warning Lights is conducted for new installations. (will be provided as proposed) 4 Year Accident Summary (2010 Thru 2007) Near Oak Intermediate School Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 1. Emperor/Oak 200' 10/23/08 15:10 Th Sideswipe PDO NB U Turn hit EB W Veh 2. Emperor/Oak 1 11/13/07 15:05 Tu Broadside PDO 56 LFT hit Parked EB Veh 3. Oak/Emperor 167' 12/19/07 21:30 We Veh/Ped ]NJ Ped (14 yr) Crossing N EB Oak hit by NB Veh Hr .11 5 URBAN (U) Flashing Yellow Beacon at School Mast (All Parts M�t Be Satlltwd) Paf� A A N -D Part 13 mpl AND rt PaC ,rTISFIED YES i— NO F,M��FIEL ES,)� ,�-ATiSREL VES, X- Hl- --1 I$ F I E CE: �J -- f4{ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT OAK INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Provide 1 (111-6) in Street School Children Crossing Sign to Replace Non -Standard Sign for NL at Emperor and Oak r n.- SCHOPL STATE LAW swza-, (CA) V TO Solar Flashing Assembly AssemblyA Install - on Oak Bwith Downward Facing lyA-eror and ArrowalongwithIn- between Emperor Road XWalk Lights Camino Real 111-6 in roadway sign 4.4 a -z • All proposed school area improvements and �� +• • • `L recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 " fraff c Control for School Areas' PHOTO EXHIBIT OAK INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Oak Avenue south of Emperor Avenue looking north. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. The 85 percentile speed is high at 33 MPH. Oak Avenue at Emperor Avenue looking north. EmperorAvenue provides access to Temple City High School sports facilities. Parents and students park and walk in to watch games after school hours. 03/07/2092 53:95 Calc Avenue at Emperor Avenue looking north. Theschool crosswalk is heavily used. A crossing guard is present in the afternoon. Oak Avenue at Camino Real Drive looking south. There is no existing signage at unprotected crosswalk. APed Count at the crosswalk was conducted. signage at unprotected crosswalk, A Ped Count at the crosswalk was conducted. Oak Avenue looking south. Cars are picking up speed traveling northbound as they cross Camino Real Drive. Temple Citv Hieh School EXISTING CONDITIONS AT TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL (9TH Thru 12th Grade) 2,012 Students 14. '411, 1,805 ADT �y J I y� Ca�,D0 ;�tltt .St - AS—.- �� � e • ' Leto ��--�� • 2,781 ADT •� .in d$� �I o • ' •p' Existing Safe Route to School - All -Way Stop Control - Two -Way Stop Control Signal 0 Accidents o cif a a - Existing Pavement Legends D "SCHOOL ZONE" No School Signage on TCBIvd Unprotected NS Xwalk (EL) No � Tist Existing Signage at Xwalk(ped count conducted) Advance n Assembly D signs and legends existing on Lemon Existing Conditions: Lemon Avenue: Temple • 85th Percentile speed is high at 33 mph near the school City Blvd to Oak Avenue • No Posted 25 mph signs approaching school • 2,781 ADT on Lemon Ave • 1 lane each direction • No Parking 7-5 pm on both sides of Lemon • No existing Ped Xing Signs at Unprotected Xwalk at Trelawney School uses non-compliant in roadway ped signs • Cars are picking up speed traveling WB • Residential land use • Parking lot as well as bus areas access off of Lemon Temple City Boulevard: • Temple City Blvd 2 lanes in each direction Lemon Ave to Camino • Adjacent to school only has pavement "School Zone 25 mph" Real no signage 0 Heavy pedestrian route i1 4 Ila ;p F Existing Safe Route to School - All -Way Stop Control - Two -Way Stop Control Signal 0 Accidents o cif a a - Existing Pavement Legends D "SCHOOL ZONE" No School Signage on TCBIvd Unprotected NS Xwalk (EL) No � Tist Existing Signage at Xwalk(ped count conducted) Advance n Assembly D signs and legends existing on Lemon Existing Conditions: Lemon Avenue: Temple • 85th Percentile speed is high at 33 mph near the school City Blvd to Oak Avenue • No Posted 25 mph signs approaching school • 2,781 ADT on Lemon Ave • 1 lane each direction • No Parking 7-5 pm on both sides of Lemon • No existing Ped Xing Signs at Unprotected Xwalk at Trelawney School uses non-compliant in roadway ped signs • Cars are picking up speed traveling WB • Residential land use • Parking lot as well as bus areas access off of Lemon Temple City Boulevard: • Temple City Blvd 2 lanes in each direction Lemon Ave to Camino • Adjacent to school only has pavement "School Zone 25 mph" Real no signage 0 Heavy pedestrian route CAMUTCD Guidelines for In -Roadway Lights Section 4N.02 For NS Existing Crosswalk at Lemon and Trelawney The location of the In -Roadway Warning Lights within the lanes should be based on engineering judgment. Standard: In -Roadway Warning Lights (IRWLs) shall not be placed on or within the crosswalk markings. If the In -Roadway Warning Lights are activated by a push button, the PUSH BUTTON FOR PEDESTRIAN WARNING LIGHTS, CROSS WITH CAUTION (R62E(CA)) sign shall be used. The following shall be considered when evaluating the need for In -Roadway Warning Lights: a. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled. (uncontrolled) b. An engineering traffic study to determine if In -Roadway Warning Lights are compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may or may not be, controlled by traffic signals or STOPIYIELD signs. (Existing unprotected xwalk, lights will increase awareness and safety) c. Standard traffic signs for crossings and crosswalk pavement markings are provided. (will be provided as proposed) d. At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period. (met) e. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak -hour pedestrian usage. (met) f. The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 km/h (45 mph) or less. (speed is 33 mph) g. In -Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight distance for the posted speed limit. (met) h. Public education on In -Roadway Warning Lights is conducted for new installations. (will be provided as proposed) 4 Year Accident Summary (2010 Thru 2007) Near Temple City High School Location Dist.. Date Time Day 1. Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave 2. Temple City Blvd/Lemon 3. Temple City Blvd/Lemon 4. Temple City Blvd/Lemon S. Lemon/Oak 1 01/02/10 1 01/21/10 1 01/26/10 350' 01/13/10 N 102' 10/16/09 17:55 Sa 19:35 Th 14:20 To 18:15 We 08:10 Fr Collision Severity Factor Type Speed INJ NB Veh hit NB Veh Rearend Speed INJ SB Veh hit SB Veh Rearend Sideswipe PDO WB Lft Veh hit SB Thru Veh Head-on INJ NB Thru Veh hit SB Thru Veh Backing PDO WB Thru Veh hit Veh Backing out of Drwy Location Dist. Date Time Day Collision Severity Factor Type 6. Lemon/Trelawney 1 06/19/09 17:35 Fr Sideswipe PDO WB Veh hit WB Thru Veh 7. Temple City 749' 06/11/09 14:05 Th Head-on PDO NB Veh hit SB Veh Blvd/Lemon N Speed 8. Temple 1 7/26/09 19:23 Su Broadside PDO WB Thru Veh hit SB City/Lemon Thru Veh 9. Oak/Lemon 30' S 04/13/08 03:32 Su Hit Obj PDO SB Veh hit Object 10. Temple City 1 02/09/08 15:40 Sa Sideswipe INJ WB Thru Veh hit SB Blvd/Camino Real Thru Veh 11. Temple City 1 10/02/08 15:05 Th Broadside INJ SB Thru Veh hit NB Blvd/Lemon Left Turn Veh 12. 21' E 05/03/07 08:10 Th Rearend PDO WB Thru Veh hit WB Lemon/Trelawney Speed Thru Veh 13. Temple City 1 05/16/07 13:30 We Broadside INJ SB Thru Veh hit WB Blvd/Camino Real Thru Veh 14. Temple City 309' 05/22/07 18:40 Tu Rearend INJ SB Thru Veh hit SB Blvd/Camino Real S Speed RT Veh 15. Temple City 21'S 01/20/07 11:48 Sa Broadside PDO NB Thru Veh hit WB Blvd/Lemon Thru Veh 16. Temple City 1 05/01/07 16:05 To Head -On PDO NB Left Veh hit SB Blvd/Lemon Thru Veh T L I Hvl RURAL ;Rj URBAN (U) Flashing Yellow Beacon at School Crobsillys SATISFIED YES NO 71 (All Paris Nlust Be, Satistle.d) PartA u c,,TISFIEC '�ES�C t 0 E AND Part B 'ES X IJ AND Part C N-, I A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL Install Yellow Crosswalks With Diagonal Or Zebra Striping at Existing Stop/Signal Controlled Intersections Install SR4-1(CA) AssemblyC -on Lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak and on Temple City Blvd between Lemon and Camino Real Camino Real Flashing Assembly B for unprotected Xwalk in East Leg at Lemon and Trelawney along with ADA Ramps with Truncated Domes SCHOOL SPEED SRO(CA) u1111 25 MEN FRED 514T • All proposed school area Improvements and recommendations are based on guidelines from CAMUTCD Chapter 7 'Traffic Control for School Areas" PHOTO EXHIBIT TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL Looking north at intersection of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Temple City Boulevard south of Camino Real Avenue looking north. Lemon Avenue east of Trelawney Avenue looking west. Street fronts school and lacks "25 mph' posted signage. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue intersection. Use of non- compliant roadway Ped signs. Lemon Avenue at Oak Avenue intersection looking west. Zebra striping will make crosswalk more visible to motorists. Temple City Boulevard north of Lemon Avenue looking south. This is a heavy pedestrian route located on a busy arterial with high traffic volumes and two lanes in each direction. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Local Assistance 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 RECEIVED TTY 711 (916)654-3151 Fax (916) 653-7621 .SAN 18 - 1 January 8, 2012 Mr. Jose Bulldo City Manager City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 Attn: Mr. Jose Bulido Dear Mr. Bulldo: TEMPLE CITY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 7 "K cr I f r '16/44, EDMUND G. BROWN Jr. Governor File: 07-IA-0-TMPC SR2SL-5365(008) LongdenlOak;Camino Real/Oak;Temple City/Lemon; Muscatel/Emperor, B roadway/Noel.; L Your letter dated December 13, 2013 requested an allocation of State funds from the Safe Route to School Program (SR2S) for City of Temple City Safe Route to School project. The State hereby makes the allocation in the amount of $431,900.00 of State funds for all phases of this project effective January 08, 2013. You may now proceed with the project. Any work done after this date will be eligible for reimbursement. This Office will soon send you a Program Supplement Agreement for execution, along with a Master Agreement if one has not been executed. Please do not submit invoices for this project until the agreements are fully executed by both you and the State.. The project award information should be submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) immediately after award of the construction contract. An Award Information sheet needs to be included with your first invoice for reimbursement. If you have any questions, please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer. Sincerely, WINTON EMMETT (ACTING), Chief Office of Project Implementation - South Division of Local Assistance c: DLA AE Project Files (D7) DLAE - David Sosa Local Program Accounting Dawn Foster n n 9 -]J o Is, 09: 8 m W a v 6 no I I -]J o 09: 8 m W a no I I q W W^ 9 W p WWF WZ N p I- v E Iz mro R c'o 5 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Local Assistance 1120 N STREET P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 TTY 711 (916) 654-3151 Fax (916) 653-7621 February 5, 2013 Mr. Steve Masura Director of Community Development City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780-2249 Dear Mr. Masura: EDMUND G. BROWN Jr, Governor File: D7-LA-0-TMPC SR2SL-5365(008) LcngdentOak;Camino Real/Oak;Temple City/Lemon; Muscatel/Emperor; Broadway/Noel; L Enclosed are two originals for both the Administering Agency -State Master Agreement No. e0407S, and the Program Supplement Agreement No. OK62 Rev. 000 . Please sign both originals of these two Agreements and return them to this office, Office of Local Programs - MS1within 90 days from the date of this letter. If the signed Agreements are not received back in this office within 90 days, funds will be disencumbered and/or decbligated. Alterations should not be made to the agreement language or funding. Attach your local agency's certified authorizing resolution that clearly identifies the project and the official authorized to execute the agreement. A fully executed copy of the agreement will be returned to you upon ratification by Caltrans. No invoices for reimbursement can be processed until the agreement is fully executed. A copy of the State approved finance letter, containing the fund encumbrance and reversion date information will be mailed to you with your copies of the executed agreements. Your prompt action is requested. If you have questions, please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer. Sincerely, WINTON EMMETT (ACTING), Chief Office of Project Implementation - South Division of Local Assistance Enclosures c: OLP AE Project Files (07) DLAE - David Sosa PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. K62 Adv Project ID Date: January 30, 2013 to 0713000271 Location: 07-LA-0-TMPC ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT Project Number: SR2SL-5365(008) FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO 00407S E.A. Number: Locode: 5365 This Program Supplement, effective , hereby adopts and incorporates into the Administering Agency -State Agreement No. 00407S for State Funded Projects which was ertered into between the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the STATE with an effective date of and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This PROGRAM SUPPLEMEN- is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforemertioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No, approved by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY on (See copy attached). The ADMINISTERING AGENCY further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted belov✓ encumbered to this project, Administering Agency accepts and w II comply with the Special Covenants and remarks set forth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: Longden/Oak; Camino Real/Oak;Temple City/Lemon, Muscatel/Emperor,Broadway/Noel;La Rosa/Rio Honda; Broadway/Cloverly;Daleview/G.-and and Longley/Woodruff TYPE OF WORK: Construct sidewalks,curb ramps.install solar powered pedestrian activated crosswalks,speed feedback. Estimated Cost State Funds Matching Funds STATE $431,900 CO LOCAL OTHER $57.000.00 $0.00 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By Chief, Office of Project Implementation Title Division of Local Assistance Date - -- — --- Date — Attest ---- - ------ --- --------- I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance Accounting Officer'i •� �;_i:�;mE,r�7tL�t-� Date �1- �_._' i=.t__ $431,900.00 Program Supplement DO -4075-K62- SERIAL Page 9 of 4 STA -E OF CAnFOR%IA OEPAR-MENT or TRANSPORTATiOI! PROGRAM SUPPLMENT AND CERTIFICATION FORM PSCF 1REM 01/2010) TO' STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE Claims Autlrts 3301 "C" Street, Rm 404 Sacramento, CA 95816 FROM Department of Transportation S--DJECT Encumbrance Document _ 1PNOORI LOCALAGENC1 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY $431,900,00 PROCUREMENTTYPE Local Assistance DATE PREPARED' PRO IECT NUMBER 1/3112013 0713000271 R DOT [SIT 09 NUMBS R I CONTRACT NUMBER RQS-26 G 0-071300 0 00754.1 CHAPTER STATUTES ITEM YEAR PEC/PECT TASK/SUBTASK 21 2D12 2000-1 D2-042 2012-2013 20.30.01 D.535 2620/0400 AMOUNT $431,900.00 TOTAL 431,900.00 ADA Notil Fo', lIdMduals 1A 52,11, Tz—,1166ee Ns durumeni is arnz�ls In allern.Ae formats FnnnbrmaUon, cx�11515 65� o'410 of TDO (51 E; -0090 p1 .¢ale Rmwos ana Focros n:anzyemaat, 11:0 is Slrer.. fd.. �'SacunenL C^9:Ei9, VC# 21265 It 1 SR2SL-5365(008) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS Chapter Statutes Item Year Program BC ; Category Fund Source AMOUNT Program Supplement 00 -407S -K62- SERIAL Page 2 of 4 V! -LN -V -1I f- SR2SL-5365(008) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. 2. 1. This Program Supplement Agreement (PSA) is intended for Safe Route to School (SR2S) Program funded with State -only funding. Separate agreements are needed if PROJECT is also funded with any other STATE administered State or Federal funds. 2. The PROJECT will he administered in accordance with the SR2S Program Guidelines, as approved and amended, and the PROJECT Application. 3 This PSA allows reimbursement of eligible PROJECT expenditures to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY for which State funds are allocated. The effective State allocation date establishes eligibility for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to start reimbursable work and seek reimbursement of funds. Any work done prior to the effective allocation date is not eligible for reimbursement from the SR2S funds. 4. The STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that SR2S funds available for reimbursement to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY by the STATE will be limited to the amount allocated and encumbered by the STATE. Any additional funds made available by future allocations will be encumbered on this PROJECT by use of a STATE approved Allocation Letter and Finance Letter. 5, The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to encumber the funds under agreement and award the construction contract by June 30th of the fiscal year in which funds are programmed. For projects unable to meet this deadline, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY may request, in writing, a time extension from the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). A one-time extension, for a maximum period of one year, may be granted by the DLAE. Projects unable to meet the new deadline may be dropped from the program. 6. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to provide contract award information to the STATE when submitting first invoice for this PROJECT. Attachment I of this PSA may be used for providing the necessary contract award information. 7. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the "Report of Expenditures" to the DLAE within six (6) months after the project completion in accordance with Section 17.5 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). 8. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to follow all relevant State laws and requirements including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 3. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current published Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Program Supplement DO -4075-K62- SERIAL Page 3 of 4 u! +LH•U- I IVI Y 1 SR2SL-5365(008) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS V I1 JUI GU I a 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each phase by the execution of this Project Program Supplement Agreement, or by STATE's approval of an applicable Finance Letter. STATE reserves the right to suspend future authorizations/obligations for Federal aid projects, or encumberances for State funded projects, as well as to suspend invoice payments for any on-going or future project by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period. If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit for each phase a written explanation of the absence of PROJECT activity along with target billing date and target billing amount. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Final Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of PROJECT completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Program Supplement 00 -4075 -K62 -SERIAL Page 4 of 4 MASTER AGREEMENT ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT FOR STATE -FUNDED PROJECTS 07 City of Temple City District Administering Agency Agreement No. 004075 This AGREEMENT, is entered into effective this day of , 20 , by and between the City of Temple City, hereinafter referred to as "ADMINISTERING AGENCY," and the State of California, acting by and through its Department of Transportation (Caltrans), hereinafter referred to as 'STATE", and together referred to as "PARTIES" or individually as a "PARTY." RECITALS: 1. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted legislation by which certain State funds are made available for use on local transportation related projects of public entities qualified to act as recipients of these state funds; and 2. WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has applied to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and/or STATE for funding from either the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), or other State -funded programs (herein referred to as STATE FUNDS), as defined in the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG), for use on local authorized transportation related projects as a local administered project(s), hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and 3. WHEREAS, said PROJECT will not receive any federal funds; and 4. WHEREAS, before STATE FUNDS will be made available for PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement to establish terms and conditions applicable to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY when receiving STATE FUNDS for a designated PROJECT facility and to the subsequent operation and maintenance of that completed facility. NOW, THEREFORE, the PARTIES agree as follows Page 1 of 16 ARTICLE I - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 1. This AGREEMENT shall have no force or effect with respect to any program project unless and until a project -specific Program Supplement to this AGREEMENT for state funded projects, hereinafter referred to as "PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT", has been fully executed by both STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 2. The State approved project -specific allocation letter designate the party responsible for implementing PROJECT, type of work and location of PROJECT. 3. The PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT sets out special covenants as a condition for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to receive STATE FUNDS from/through STATE for designated PROJECT. The PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall also show these STATE FUNDS that have been initially encumbered for PROJECT along with the matching funds to be provided by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and/or others. Execution of PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT by the PARTIES shall cause ADMINISTERING AGENCY to adopt all of the terms of this AGREEMENT as though fully set forth therein in the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. Unless otherwise expressly delegated in a resolution by the governing body of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, and with written concurrence by STATE, the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall be approved and managed by the governing body of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to execute and return each project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT within ninety (90) days of receipt. The PARTIES agree that STATE may suspend future allocations, encumbrances and invoice payments for any on-going or future STATE FUNDED PROJECT performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if any project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is not returned within that ninety (90) day period unless otherwise agreed by STATE in writing. 5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY further agrees, as a condition to the release and payment of STATE FUNDS encumbered for the PROJECT described in each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, to comply with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and all of the agreed-upon Special Covenants or Remarks incorporated within the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, and Cooperative/Contribution Agreement where appropriate, defining and identifying the nature of the specific PROJECT. 6. STATE FUNDS will not participate in any portion of PROJECT work performed in advance of the effective date of the executed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT for said PROJECT. 7. Projects allocated with STATE FUNDS from the STIP will be administered in accordance with the current CTC STIP Guidelines, as adopted or amended and in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) published by STATE. 8. Projects allocated with STATE FUNDS not programmed in the STIP will be administered in accordance with the applicable chapter of the LAPG and/or any other instructions published by STATE. 9. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's eligible costs for preliminary engineering work includes all preliminary work directly related to PROJECT up to contract award for construction, including, but not limited to, environmental studies and permits (E&P), preliminary surveys and reports, laboratory work, soil investigations, the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), advertising for bids, awarding of a contract and project development contract administration. Page 2 of 16 10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY's eligible costs for construction engineering includes actual inspection and supervision of PROJECT construction work; construction staking; laboratory and field testing; and the preparation and processing of field reports, records, estimates, final reports, and allowable expenses of employees/consultants engaged in such activities. 11. Unless the PARTIES agree otherwise in writing, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's employees or its sub -contractor engineering consultant shall be responsible for all PROJECT engineering work. 12. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not proceed with final design of PROJECT until final environmental approval of PROJECT. Final design entails the design work necessary to complete the PS&E and other work necessary for a construction contract but not required earlier for environmental clearance of that PROJECT. 13. If PROJECT is not on STATE -owned right-of-way, PROJECT shall be constructed in accordance with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) that describes minimum statewide design standards for local agency streets and roads. The design standards for projects off the National Highway System (NHS) allow STATE to accept either the STATE's minimum statewide design standards or the approved geometric design standards of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Additionally, for projects off the NHS, STATE will accept ADMINISTERING AGENCY -approved standard specifications, standard plans, materials sampling and testing quality assurance programs that meet the conditions described in the then current Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 14. If PROJECT involves work within or partially within STATE -owned right-of-way, that PROJECT shall also be subject to compliance with the policies, procedures and standards of the STATE Project Development Procedures Manual and Highway Design Manual and where appropriate, an executed cooperative agreement between STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY that outlines the PROJECT responsibilities and respective obligations of the PARTIES. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its' contractors shall each obtain an encroachment permit through STATE prior to commencing any work within STATE rights of way or work which affects STATE facilities. 15. When PROJECT is not on the State Highway System (SHS) but includes work to be performed by a railroad, the contract for such work shall be prepared by ADMINISTERING AGENCY or by STATE, as the PARTIES may hereafter agree. In either event, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall enter into an agreement with the railroad providing for future maintenance of protective devices or other facilities installed under the contract. 16. The Department of General Services, Division of the State Architect, or its designee, shall review the contract PS&E for the construction of buildings, structures, sidewalks, curbs and related facilities for accessibility and usability. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a PROJECT construction contract for these types of improvements until the State Architect has issued written approval stating that the PROJECT plans and specifications comply with the provisions of sections 4450 and 4454 of the California Government Code, if applicable. Further requirements and guidance are provided in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. 17. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall provide or arrange for adequate supervision and inspection of each PROJECT. While consultants may perform supervision and inspection work for PROJECT with a fully qualified and licensed engineer, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall provide a full-time employee to be in responsible charge of each PROJECT. Page 3 of 16 18. Unless otherwise provided in the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall advertise, award, and administer the PROJECT construction contractor contracts. 19. The cost of maintenance, security, or protection performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY or contractor forces during any temporary suspension of PROJECT or at any other time may not be charged to the PROJECT. 20. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit PROJECT -specific award information, using Exhibit 23-A of the LAPG, to STATE's District Local Assistance Engineer, within sixty (60) days after contract award. A copy of Exhibit 23-A shall also be included with the submittal of the first invoice for a construction contract by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to: Department of Transportation, Division of Accounting Local Programs Accounting Branch, MS #33, PO Box 942874, Sacramento, California 94274-0001. 21. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of project completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance Chapters 17 and 19 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 22. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. 23. The Governor and the Legislature of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdictions, have prescribed certain nondiscrimination requirements with respect to contract and other work financed with public funds. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the requirements of the FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDENDUM, attached hereto as Exhibit A and further agrees that any agreement entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY with a third party for performance of work connected with PROJECT shall incorporate Exhibit A (with third party's name replacing ADMINISTERING AGENCY) as parts of such agreement. 24. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall include in all subcontracts awarded when applicable, a clause that requires each subcontractor to comply with California Labor Code requirements that all workers employed on public works aspects of any project (as defined in California Labor Code sections 1720-1815) be paid not less than the general prevailing wage rates predetermined by the Department of Industrial Relations as effective at the date of contract award by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Page 4 of 16 h_IC79HNIall a00Lei OWN 0Y117SLTGU 1. No contract for the construction of a STATE FUNDED PROJECT shall be awarded until all necessary rights of way have been secured. Prior to the advertising for construction of PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall certify and, upon request, shall furnish STATE with evidence that all necessary rights-of-way are available for construction purposes or will be available by the time of award of the construction contract. 2. The furnishing of rights of way by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as provided for herein includes, and is limited to, the following, unless the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT provides otherwise. (a) Expenditures to purchase all real property required for PROJECT free and clear of liens, conflicting easements, obstructions and encumbrances, after crediting PROJECT with the fair market value of any excess property retained and not disposed of by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. (b) The cost of furnishing of right-of-way as provided for herein includes, in addition to real property required for the PROJECT, title free and clear of obstructions and encumbrances affecting PROJECT and the payment, as required by applicable law, of damages to owners of remainder real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by PROJECT. (c) The cost of relocation payments and services provided to owners and occupants pursuant to Government Code sections 7260-7277 when PROJECT displaces an individual, family, business, farm operation or nonprofit organization. (d) The cost of demolition and/or the sale of all improvements on the right-of-way after credit is recorded for sale proceeds used to offset PROJECT costs. (e) The cost of all unavoidable utility relocation, protection or removal. (f) The cost of all necessary hazardous material and hazardous waste treatment, encapsulation or removal and protective storage for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY accepts responsibility and where the actual generator cannot be identified and recovery made. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability that may result in the event the right-of-way for a PROJECT, including, but not limited to, being clear as certified or if said right-of-way is found to contain hazardous materials requiring treatment or removal to remediate in accordance with Federal and State laws. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall pay, from its own non-matching funds, any costs which arise out of delays to the construction of PROJECT because utility facilities have not been timely removed or relocated, or because rights-of-way were not available to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the orderly prosecution of PROJECT work. Page 5 of 16 ARTICLE III - MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT 1. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, constructed, rehabilitated, or restored by PROJECT for its intended public use until such time as the parties might amend this AGREEMENT to otherwise provide. With the approval of STATE, ADMINISTERING AGENCY or its successors in interest in the PROJECT property may transfer this obligation and responsibility to maintain and operate PROJECT property for that intended public purpose to another public entity. 2. Upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY's acceptance of the completed construction contract or upon contractor being relieved of the responsibility for maintaining and protecting PROJECT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be responsible for the maintenance, ownership, liability, and the expense thereof, for PROJECT in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of STATE and if PROJECT falls within the jurisdictional limits of another Agency or Agencies, it is the duty of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to facilitate a separate maintenance agreement(s) between itself and the other jurisdictional Agency or Agencies providing for the operation, maintenance, ownership and liability of PROJECT. Until those agreements are executed, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be responsible for all PROJECT operations, maintenance, ownership and liability in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of STATE. If, within ninety (90) days after receipt of notice from STATE that a PROJECT, or any portion thereof, is not being properly operated and maintained and ADMINISTERING AGENCY has not satisfactorily remedied the conditions complained of, the approval of future STATE FUNDED PROJECTS of ADMINISTERING AGENCY will be withheld until the PROJECT shall have been put in a condition of operation and maintenance satisfactory to STATE. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a PROJECT that has been vacated through due process of law with STATE's concurrence. 3. PROJECT and its facilities shall be maintained by an adequate and well-trained staff of engineers and/or such other professionals and technicians as PROJECT reasonably requires. Said operations and maintenance staff may be employees of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, another unit of government, or a contractor under agreement with ADMINISTERING AGENCY. All maintenance will be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the complete PROJECT improvements. Page 6 of 16 ARTICLE IV - FISCAL PROVISIONS 1. All contractual obligations of STATE are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the CTC. 2. STATE'S financial commitment of STATE FUNDS will occur only upon the execution of this AGREEMENT, the execution of each project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or STATE's approved finance letter. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY may submit signed duplicate invoices in arrears for reimbursement of allowable PROJECT costs on a monthly or quarterly progress basis once the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT has been executed by STATE. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six months commencing after the STATE FUNDS are encumbered on either the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or through a project -specific finance letter approved by STATE. STATE reserves the right to suspend future allocations and invoice payments for any on-going or future STATE FUNDED project performed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period 5. Invoices shall be submitted on ADMINISTERING AGENCY letterhead that includes the address of ADMINISTERING AGENCY and shall be formatted in accordance with Chapter 5 of the LAPM. S. Invoices must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for allowable costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs. 7. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY can only be released by STATE as reimbursements of actual allowable PROJECT costs already incurred and paid for by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 8. An indirect cost allocation plan and related documentation are to be provided to STATE (Caltrans Audits & Investigations) annually for review and approval prior to ADMINISTERING AGENCY seeking reimbursement of indirect cost incurred within each fiscal year being claimed for reimbursement. The indirect cost allocation plan must be prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87 and Chapter 4 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 9. STATE will withhold the greater of either two (2) percent of the total of all STATE FUNDS encumbered for each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or $40,000 until ADMINISTERING AGENCY submits the Final Report of Expenditures for each completed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT PROJECT. 10. The estimated total cost of PROJECT, the amount of STATE FUNDS obligated, and the required matching funds may be adjusted by mutual consent of the PARTIES with an allocation letter and finance letter. STATE FUNDING may be increased to cover PROJECT cost increases only if such additional funds are available and the CTC and/or STATE concurs with that increase in the form of an allocation and finance letter. Page 7 of 16 11. When such additional STATE FUNDS are not available, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that any increases in PROJECT costs must be defrayed with ADMINISTERING AGENCY's own funds. 12. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall use its own non STATE FUNDS to finance the local share of eligible costs and all PROJECT expenditures or contract items ruled ineligible for financing with STATE FUNDS. STATE shall make the final determination of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's cost eligibility for STATE FUNDED financing with respect to claimed PROJECT costs. 13. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse STATE for STATE's share of costs for work performed by STATE at the request of ADMINISTERING AGENCY. STATE's costs shall include overhead assessments in accordance with section 8755.1 of the State Administrative Manual, 14. STATE FUNDS allocated from the STIP are subject to the timely use of funds provisions enacted by Senate Bill 45, approved in 1997, and subsequent STIP Guidelines and State procedures approved by the CTC and STATE. 15. STATE FUNDS encumbered for PROJECT are available for liquidation only for five (5) years from the beginning of the State fiscal year when those funds were appropriated in the State Budget. STATE FUNDS not liquidated within these periods will be reverted unless a Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA) is submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance in accordance with Government Code section 16304. The exact date of fund reversion will be reflected in the STATE signed PROJECT finance letter. 16. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROJECT -related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid to rank and file STATE employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY are in excess of DPA rates, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference, and any overpayments Inadvertently paid by STATE shall be reimbursed to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on demand. 17. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments, and 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. 18. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree that (a) Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items and (b) those parties shall comply with federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Every sub -recipient receiving PROJECT funds as a contractor or sub -contractor under this AGREEMENT shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the provisions set Page 8 of 16 forth in 23 CFR Parts 140, 645 and 646 when contracting with railroad and utility companies. 19. Any PROJECT costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under OMB Circular A-87, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, 23 CFR Parts 140, 645 and 646 or 49 CFR, Part 18, are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE. 20. Upon written demand by STATE, any overpayment to ADMINISTERING AGENCY of amounts invoiced to STATE shall be returned to STATE. 21. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY fail to refund any moneys due STATE as provided herein or should ADMINISTERING AGENCY breach this AGREEMENT by failing to complete PROJECT without adequate justification and approval by STATE, then, within thirty (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed to in writing between the PARTIES hereto, STATE, acting through the State Controller, the State Treasurer, the CTC or any other public entity or agency, may intercept, withhold and demand the transfer of an amount equal to the amount paid by or owed to STATE for each PROJECT, from future apportionments, or any other funds due ADMINISTERING AGENCY from the Highway Users Tax Fund or any other sources of funds, and/or may also withhold approval of future STATE FUNDED projects proposed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 22. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY be declared to be in breach of this AGREEMENT or otherwise in default thereof by STATE, and if ADMINISTERING AGENCY is constituted as a joint powers authority, special district, or any other public entity not directly receiving funds through the State Controller, STATE is authorized to obtain reimbursement from whatever sources of funding are available, including the withholding or transfer of funds, pursuant to Article IV - 21, from those constituent entities comprising a joint powers authority or by bringing of an action against ADMINISTERING AGENCY or its constituent member entities, to recover all funds provided by STATE hereunder. 23. ADMINISTERING AGENCY acknowledges that the signatory party represents the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and further warrants that there is nothing within a Joint Powers Agreement, by which ADMINISTERING AGENCY was created, if any exists, that would restrict or otherwise limit STATE's ability to recover STATE FUNDS improperly spent by ADMINISTERING AGENCY in contravention of the terms of this AGREEMENT. Page 9 of 16 ARTICLE V AUDITS, THIRD PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS 1. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT work and records when determined to be necessary or appropriate and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with STATE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by paragraph three (3) of Article V. 2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The accounting system of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices sent to or paid by STATE. 3. For the purpose of determining compliance with Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance and casts of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code section 8546.7, ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY's contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above -referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT and PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire PROJECT period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under any PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a PROJECT for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions and ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of OMB Circular A-133 if it receives a total of $500,000 or more in STATE FUNDS in a single fiscal year. The STATE FUNDS received under PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT are a part of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 20.205, Highway Planning and Research. 5. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to include all PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTS adopting the terms of this AGREEMENT in the schedule of projects to be examined in ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S annual audit and in the schedule of projects to be examined under its single audit prepared in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. 6. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a construction contract over $10,000 or other contracts over $25,000 [excluding professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code sections 4525 (d), (e) and (f)] on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed under this AGREEMENT without the prior written approval of STATE. All contracts awarded by ADMINISTERING AGENCY intended or used as local match credit must meet the requirements set forth in this AGREEMENT regarding focal match funds. Page 10 of 16 7. Any subcontract entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain all of the provisions of Article IV, FISCAL PROVISIONS, and this ARTICLE V, AUDITS, THIRD -PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS and shall mandate that travel and per diem reimbursements and third -party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as PROJECT costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors. B. To be eligible for local match credit, ADMINISTERING AGENCY must ensure that local match funds used for a PROJECT meet the fiscal provisions requirements outlined in ARTICLE IV in the same manner that is required of all other PROJECT expenditures. 9. In addition to the above, the pre -award requirements of third -party contractor/consultants with ADMINISTERING AGENCY should be consistent with LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES. Page 11 of 16 ARTICLE VI - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to use all PROJECT funds reimbursed hereunder only for transportation purposes that are in conformance with Article XIX of the California State Constitution and other California laws. 2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations, and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines and Local Assistance Procedures Manual as published by STATE and incorporated herein, including all subsequent approved revisions thereto applicable to PROJECT unless otherwise designated in the project -specific executed PROJECT SUPPLEMENT. 3. This AGREEMENT is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by the State Legislature or adopted by the CTC that may affect the provisions, terms, or funding of this AGREEMENT in any manner. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the officers and employees of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, when engaged in the performance of this AGREEMENT, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of STATE. 5. Each project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT shall separately establish the terms and funding limits for each described PROJECT funded under this AGREEMENT and that PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. No STATE FUNDS are obligated against this AGREEMENT. 6. ADMINISTERING AGENCY certifies that neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor its principals are suspended or debarred at the time of the execution of this AGREEMENT, and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will notify STATE immediately in the event a suspension or a debarment occurs after the execution of this AGREEMENT. 7, ADMINISTERING AGENCY warrants, by execution of this AGREEMENT, that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE has the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability, pay only for the value of the PROJECT work actually performed, or in STATE's discretion, to deduct from the price of PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 8. In accordance with Public Contract Code section 10296, ADMINISTERING AGENCY hereby certifies under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against ADMINISTERING AGENCY within the immediate preceding two (2) year period because of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's failure to comply with an order of a federal court that orders ADMINISTERING AGENCY to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board, 9, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with STATE that may have an impact upon the outcome of this AGREEMENT or any individual PROJECT encompassed within a PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall also list current contractors who may have a financial interest in the outcome of a PROJECT undertaken pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Page 12 of 16 10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY hereby certifies that it does not now have nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of any PROJECT initiated under this AGREEMENT. 11. ADMINISTERING AGENCY warrants that this AGREEMENT was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks or other unlawful consideration either promised or paid to any STATE employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to terminate this AGREEMENT without liability, to pay only for PROJECT work actually performed, or to deduct from a PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT price or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback, or other unlawful consideration. 12. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the STATE's Contract Officer, who may consider any written or verbal evidence submitted by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. The decision of the Contract Officer, issued in writing, shall be conclusive and binding on the PARTIES on all questions of fact considered and determined by the Contract Officer. 13. Neither the pending of a dispute nor its consideration by the Contract Officer will excuse the ADMINISTERING AGENCY from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT and each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT. 14. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction of ADMINISTERING AGENCY arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims and suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this AGREEMENT. 15. Neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including but not limited to, tortuous, contractual, inverse condemnation and other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this AGREEMENT. 16. In the event of (a) ADMINISTERING AGENCY failing to timely proceed with effective PROJECT work in accordance with the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT; (b) failing to maintain any applicable bonding requirements; and (c) otherwise materially violating the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and/or any PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, STATE reserves the right to terminate funding for that PROJECT upon thirty (30) days' written notice to ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 17. No termination notice shall become effective if, within thirty (30) days after receipt of a Notice of Termination, ADMINISTERING AGENCY either cures the default involved or, if the default is not reasonably susceptible of cure within said thirty (30) day period the ADMINISTERING Page 13 of 16 AGENCY proceeds thereafter to complete that cure in a manner and time line acceptable to STATE. 18. Any such termination shall be accomplished by delivery to ADMINISTERING AGENCY of a Notice of Termination, which notice shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days after receipt, specifying the reason for the termination, the extent to which funding of work under this AGREEMENT and the applicable PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is terminated and the date upon which such termination becomes effective, if beyond thirty (30) days after receipt. During the period before the effective termination date, ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE shall meet to attempt to resolve any dispute. In the event of such termination, STATE may proceed with the PROJECT work in a manner deemed proper by STATE. If STATE terminates funding for PROJECT with ADMINISTERING AGENCY for the reasons stated in paragraph sixteen (16) of ARTICLE VI, STATE shall pay ADMINISTERING AGENCY the sum due ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or STATE -approved finance letter prior to termination, provided, however, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is not in default of the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT or the project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and that the cost of any PROJECT completion to STATE shall first be deducted from any sum due ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 19. In the case of inconsistency or conflicts with the terms of this AGREEMENT and that of a project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or Cooperative Agreement, the terms stated in that PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT and/or Cooperative Agreement shall prevail over those in this AGREEMENT. 20. Without the written consent of STATE, this AGREEMENT is not assignable by ADMINISTERING AGENCY either in whole or in part. 21. No alteration or vadation of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the PARTIES, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this AGREEMENT by their duly authorized officer. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION M Chief, Office of Project Implementation Division of Local Assistance Date Page 14 of 16 City of Temple City E City of Temple City Representative Name & Title (Authorized Governing Body Representative) Date EXHIBIT A - FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDENDUM 1. In the performance of this Agreement, ADMINISTERING AGENCY will not discriminate against any employee for employment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, ancestry or national origin, physical disability, medical condition, marital status, political affiliation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, sexual orientation, color, religion, ancestry, or national origin, physical disability, medical condition, marital status, political affiliation, family and medical care leave, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment; upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees for employment, notices to be provided by STATE setting forth the provisions of this Fair Employment section. 2. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractor(s) and all subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, 1290-0 et seq.), and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., Title 2, 7285.0, et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code section 12900(a -f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this AGREEMENT by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Each of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and all subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreements, as appropriate. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all contracts and subcontracts to perform work under this AGREEMENT. 4. ADMINISTERING AGENCY will permit access to the records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data and records by STATE, the State Fair Employment and Housing Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by STATE, for the purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment section of this Agreement. 5. Remedies for Willful Violation: (a) STATE may determine a willful violation of the Fair Employment provision to have occurred upon receipt of a final judgment to that effect from a court in an action to which ADMINISTERING AGENCY was a party, or upon receipt of a written notice from the Fair Employment and Housing Commission that it has investigated and determined that ADMINISTERING AGENCY has violated the Fair Employment Practices Act and had issued an order under Labor Code section 1426 which has become final or has obtained an injunction under Labor Code section 1429. (b) For willful violation of this Fair Employment Provision, STATE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by STATE in securing the goods or services thereunder shall be borne and paid for by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and by the surety under the performance bond, if any, and STATE may deduct from any moneys due Page 15 of 16 or thereafter may become due to ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the difference between the price named in the Agreement and the actual cost thereof to STATE to cure ADMINISTERING AGENCY's breach of this Agreement. Page 16 of 16 PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN Sf`RVICES FOR THE SR2S, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT (STATE FUNDED), 07-LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) AT NINE SEPARATE SCHOOLS IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY [111i- FARAH INC. (EFI) California Certified Small Business Enterprise SBE#1443300 RCE 42080, TR 1926 , LS 8255, QSD/ QSP 21962, REB1095310 CIVIL AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, AND LAND SURVEYING 1593 Liberty Dr, Corona, CA 92881 Tel. (951)-898-0772, Fax (951)-278-4110 email: efarah@eliefarahinc.com Website: Eliefarahinc.com California Certified Small Business #1443340 1593 Liberty Drive, Corona, CA. 92881 Tel. (951.)-898-0772, Fax (951)-278-4110 June 25, 2013 email: Web. I r Mr. Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 Via mail Subject: Proposal for Professional Design Services- SR2S, Safe Routes To School Project (State Funded) Project, 07 -LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) at Nine separate schools located at the intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruffin the City of Temple City Dear Mr. Perisco: Per your request, Elie Farah, Inc. (EFI) is pleased to submit this Proposal for SR2S, Safe Routes To School Project (State Funded) Project, 07 -LA-O-TMPC; SR2SL-5365(008) in the City of Temple City. Please consider the following: .L EFI is a California Certified Small Business Firm (41443340). This provide us with extreme flexibility. We are able to control cost and meet aggressive schedules. 1 The principal is the project manager and the single point of contact. Elie Farah will be the Project Manager/Traffic Engineer/and Civil Engineer. I am personally involved in all aspects of the designireview and management of each project ensuring seamless results. Most projects are designed/reviewed by me. Larger firms tend to assign junior engineers with little oversight. rl_ I am registered as a Civil Engineer and a Traffic Engineer with over twenty five (28) years of experience. This provides me with a perspective not shared by many. I am able to analyze projects from various aspects and recognize and avoid potential conflicts and costly construction problems before they occur. 1 EFI has recently designed Safe Route to school improvement plans for the City of Alhambra, City of Commerce, and City of Rosemead. As a former Consulting City Engineer for various Cities, plan checker, a construction manager/resident 1 of 14 Eire- Far17i r. 1170 engineer, and a design engineer with a diversified background, I am familiar with the many design requirements. I strive to urovide a PS&E Dackaae that is clear, concise, and complete. I insure that final plans are once again checked in the field with the designer prior to finalization. This minimizes change orders and claims during the construction phase ,i_ EFI has delivered many oroiects as Dromised on time and on budget. Please feel free to check our references. EFI will not bid or accept a job unless we have the qualifications and can meet the timeline. 1 EFI has successfully completed many projects on time and on budget. Our list of client Cities includes the City of Torrance, City of Irwindale, City of Alhambra, City of Rosemead, City of Commerce, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Temple City, City of Upland, City of Villa Park, Orange County Public Works, City of Lake Elsinore City of South Pasadena, and City of El Monte. We look forward to having the opportunity to discuss our qualifications and approach in a greater detail. Should you have any questions or need additional information, Please call me at (951) 898-0772. Sincerely, Die Farah. Inn. Elie Farah, MS, PE, TE, LS, QSD/QSP Principal Engineer 2of14 Eife l cra z inc TABLE OF CONTENTS Submec Paqe No. Section Scope of VVork........ ..............--... 04 Section Project Staff Qoa|ihcaUonn--,—~...........~...--.. 05 Section 3 Refonmncos.....~.--.............~..---.........� 11 Section Section Company Qualifications ............................................................. 11 CostProposal ..................................................................... 12 Section Schedule........ ......................... ............................................... 14 EFI will complete projects in an efficient and cost effective manner. In performing services, EFI will follow the following parameters: ✓ The scope of work for the project includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1 of the RFP. ✓ Provide all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. ✓ Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create a base map of existing conditions. Prepare plans and details. ✓ Prepare specifications. ✓ Prepare cost estimates. ✓ Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. ✓ Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. ✓ Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. ✓ Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: o First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. o City will take 2 weeks for the review. o Final submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review comments. ✓ Provide bi-weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. ✓ Attend 3 project meetings. ✓ Final Product: PS&E Bid Package ready forbidding, including 1 wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, MsWord file of Specifications, Excel file of Estimates, pdf file of all other documents. EFI continues monitoring the schedule and the progress of the design. Additional resources will be employed in case of a slip in the project schedule. EFI will complete the design on time & on budget 4of14 Elle Iris EFI Project Manager Elie Farah, PE, G1,::k;iWj1':&9JiUNI�Ml7tl>lli:t:A'&J4Wifl�I�Ig2 ....Civil Engineer/Traffic Engineer QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE EDUCATION MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 1985 University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 1983 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ASSOCIATES OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1981 Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana REGISTRATION REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, CA 4C42080 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, CA #LS8258 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CA TR 41926 QSD/QSP 421962 Mr. Farah is a registered Professional Civil Engineer, and Traffic Engineer with a diversified background and more than 28 years of diverse experience. The following is a partial summary: For the Citv of Alhambra. SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS 5of14 Elle Fav c;f' bye EFI designed 2008/2009 SRT and Alhambra Road Rehabilitation Proiect. This project was based on an SRT application. The two location are Alhambra Rd and 2"d Street and Commonwealth and Curtis. EFI prepared PS&E package for curb bulbouts, ADA ramps, In -pavement lighting, pedestrian activation devices, high visibility striping, lighting, speed feedback signs, and call boxes. -2011 For the Citv of Commerce. Designed the City SRTS improvements. This project was based on an SRTS application. The three locations are for improvements around three elementary schools Bandini Elementary, Rosewood Park Elementary, and Laguna Nueva Elementary. EFI prepared PS&E package for, ADA ramps, In -pavement lighting , pedestrian activation devices, high visibility striping, lighting, speed feedback signs, bulbouts at Atlantic and Jillson and in pavement lighting, and reconstruction of one street leg to remove dip in roadway. -2012 For the Citv of Rosemead. Provides City Engineering services and is presently the contract Citv Eneineer for the Citv of Rosemead. Prepared traffic modification plans for Rosemead and Valley & Rosemead and Mission as well as striping plans to incorporate adding bike lanes. Mission Drive improvement, provided the survey and design for Mission drive to include street and striping plans. Provided Stop Sign Warrant Analysis for Loftus and Bartlett and Angelus & Keim. Provided Traffic Calming measures for Rosemead PI and Earlswood Dr. Provides plan checking assistance for a variety of private development related plans. Traffic Signal Desien For the Citv of Torrance. Prepared Street Improvement, Survev, Traffic Sienal modifications. Strioine, Peer Resort, fact sheet. & TSR for the modification of the intersection at Hawthorn Blvd and Skvoark Dr (Caltrans Jurisdiction). -2011 Provided CMP Level of Service (LOS) analysis for 10 intersections for 2007,2009, 2011, &2013 Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design in the City of Torrance, at Wayne and Del Amo Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Cabrillo & Del Amo, Madrona and Torrance Blvd various location as part of the County of LA Synchronization project. Project Engineer for the design of Flashers at Lomita/Kent, Arlington/Lincoln, Anza Ave @ Narrot St, Citywide safe route to school for the City of Torrance. Project Engineer for design of the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Crenshaw Boulevard and Skypark Avenue (two separate projects) in the City of Torrance. Construction cost $2,000,000 For the Citv of Rancho Cucamonea, Prepared nuene analvsis studv for Haven Ave at the railroad. - 6 of 14 Designed a Oueue Cutter Traffic Sienal at Haven Ave and the railroad, In the City of Moreno Vallev, Designed traffic signal modification, strioin¢, traffic control plans, and Street Li¢htinu on Perris Blvd at Dracaea Ave associated with the development of a Motel 6:- 2008 In the County of Riverside. Designed a Solar Flashin¢ Beacon on Rancho California Road as part of deceleration and acceleration lanes for Wilson Creek Winery in the Temecula area.- 2008 In the City of Carson. Designed Traffic Sienal. Strioine plans, and traffic control plan for the SEC of 220th and Wilmington Ave as part of the Watson Development. 2010 For the City of Alhambra. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design in the City of Alhambra at Fremont and Main, Fremont and Poplar, Fremont and Alhambra, Los Higos and Garfield. Project Principal for Fremont widening project which is funded by State and Federal funds and required complete project and environmental report, including Right -of -Way, Relocation, SHPO, NEPA, SEQA, Noise, Parking, Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies, and being processed through Caltrans and FHWA. Construction cost $6,000,000. Project Principal for Valley Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction project which is funded by State and Federal funds. Construction cost $5,500,000. Project Manager for Valley Boulevard hnprovements (Street, 17 signals, 5 miles of fiberoptic traffic signal communication system, street lighting, striping). Work involved field surveys, identification of existing conditions and conditions which are not safe and/or not in compliance with current standards, documentation of existing conditions with field inventory as well as with pictures, preparation plans on CADD, preparation of detail cost estimates, coordination with various agencies (Caltrans, City of LA, County, MTA). Construction Cost: $5,000,000. Project Manager for Fremont Widening, 710 Interim Surface Transportation Improvements, Fremont NCL to SCL Fiberoptic Traffic Signal Interconnect Projects (Local, State and Federally Funded 3 projects under 1 contract, involving street, traffic signals, 2 miles of fiberoptic traffic signal communication system, street lighting, striping). Work involved field surveys, identification of existing conditions and conditions which are not safe and/or not in compliance with current standards, documentation of existing conditions with field inventory as well as with pictures, preparation plans on CADD, preparation of detail cost estimates, coordination with various agencies (Caltrans, City of LA, County, MTA). Construction Cost: $6,500,000. For the Countv LA traffic & Li¢htinv Division. Project Engineer for the various traffic signal modifications and installation, interconnect and radio corrected time base system installation plans and estimates in conjunction with traffic signal synchronization projects for various arterials in Los Angeles County including Arrow Highway and Huntington Drive/Alosta'i 7of14 Avenue/Foothill Boulevard at over 50 locations. Signal modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal) coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. Project Engineer for the Synchronization projects for Los Angeles County. Assisted in field surveys to assess condition of the existing signal equipment, and in the preparation of traffic signal plans on AutoCAD. The', projects involved over 60 signalized intersections on various arterials in Los Angeles County including SR210 on and off ramps, Citrus Ave., San Dimas Blvd, Foothill Avenue, Mountain Avenue. Signal', modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. Project Engineer for the traffic signal modifications plans and estimates for the County's Hooper Avenue traffic signal synchronization project. Project Engineer for the traffic signal modifications plans and estimates for Los Angeles County Azusa' Avenue traffic signal synchronization project. Project was completed in 2004. Provided Counts to the County of Los Angeles for several locations including peak hour passenger car counts, the truck count by axle for traffic signal synchronization and signal warrants. County of Los Angeles- Azusa', Ave, Gauge Ave, Torrance Blvd, and Western Ave Traffic Signal Projects TSSP- Project manager for County to provide traffic signal system design services. Supervised and designed traffic signal and interconnect plans for approximately 200 locations on various projects in the County of Los Angeles, involving over 10 different jurisdictions. Existing above and underground traffic signal equipment was reviewed to identify the improvements necessary to meet the objectives of the project prior to embarking upon the design phase, thereby avoiding any unnecessary improvements and the associated costs. Radio corrected time base units' (WWV) were installed at each location, and loops, controllers and other equipment were installed to replace' outdated equipment and provide for signal coordination throughout the corridor. Completion of the design component of this project required close coordination with County staff as well as several local jurisdictions. In the LA Countv area, Project Manager for Alameda Corridor Agency East (ACE) Rail Grade Crossing Improvement Project, Jump Start Design Package 1. Work involved traffic signals, signing and striping, roadway realignment and reconstruction, traffic control, and construction phasing as well as related improvements such as storm drain, water, sewer landscaping, underground utilities, etc. Project involved various streets encompassing 6 agencies and 14 locations in Los Angeles County. Construction Cost: $3,000,000. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Imperial and Biola and Francisquito Flashing Beacons Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal modification design at Huntington Dr and Sunnyslope Dr. For the Citv of Commerce, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Garfield Ave and Washington Blvd. Project engineer for various traffic signals upgrades along Washington Blvd and Garfield Ave. For the Citv of Temule Citv, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal modifications for Las Tunas and Sultana. ' I For the Citv of Glendale, Project engineer for the traffic signal modification for Broadway and Verdugo as a part of the Colorado Road 8of14 construction Project and Verdugo interconnect from Glendale Avenue to La Crescenta Avenue. Project Engineer for the 1-5/Colorado off -ramp realignment and reconstruction project in Glendale. Construction cost $1,000,000. City of Glendale- I-5 off ramp at Colorado. Prepared new alignment plan, signal plan, striping plan and traffic control plans. For the Citv of Anaheim. Project engineer for the Interconnect for Gilbert Avenue from Crescent to Broadway. Western Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Ball Road. Santa Ana Canyon Road from Imperial Highway to Solomon Road. Imperial Highway from Big Sky Lane to Avenido Bernardo North. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Weir Canyon and Santa Ana Canyon Road, Lincoln and Brookhmst, Lincoln and Dale, Big Sky Lane and Imperial Highway, Santa Ana Canyon and Solomon Road. Weir Canyon Road and Oak Canyon Road and Oak Canyon Road and Serrano Road. Project Engineer- Street reconstruction for Santa Ana Canyon Road and Tustin Avenue to modify the! intersection from a Four way stop to a fully signalized intersection. The plans encompassed the reconstruction ! of 300 feet of each approach to meet Caltrans Standards. In the City of Pomona, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal modifications for Dudley & Elwood as part of the Pomona Unified School District improvements. For the Citv of Industrv, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal for Albatros and Colima I intersection. For the Citv of Long Beach. Project Manager for Spring Street and 605 Freeway off -ramp realignment and widening project -Long Beach. Construction cost $1,000,000. In the Citv of Encinitas, project engineer for the Encinitas Boulevard from First Street to Village Square Road interconnect. For the Citv of Temecula, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal for Route 79 and La Paz For the Citv of Solana Beach, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Stevens Avenue and Vallev Avenue. In the Citv of San Marcos. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at airport Road and Rancho Sante Fe Road and "C" Street, In the Citv of Oceanside, Street widening of Oceanside Blvd. at El Camino Real For the Citv of Hanford, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal and Street Widening Design at 10th and Lacey, and Lacey and Greenfield, Grangeville and 12th, Route 198 and 12"' Street lighting Design Citv of Alhambra -City-wide Street Lighting System Improvements- prepared street lighting plans, specifications, 9of14 ------ -------- ;`_ r and estimates for lighting improvements as part of the city-wide lighting upgrade and conversion program. The project plans will be integrated with the City's GIS system (Oracle based, central GIS) to create a street lighting master plan. The total project cost is $2,000,000 Design for City of Alhambra area 12, 13, and 14 involving 50 sheets of street lighting plans using GSX. Citv of San Marino -City-wide Street Lighting System Improvements - prepared street lighting plans, specifications, and estimates for lighting improvements as part of the City-wide lighting upgrade and conversion program. Including voltage drop Calculations. The total project cost is $500,000. Citv of Culver Citv-Street Lighting, CDBG Project Prepared roadway lighting plans, specifications, and estimates for lighting improvements at Warner, Steller, Statham, Hayden, and Higuera including a City Parking lot. The project was funded under the CDBG program. The design included preparation of lighting level calculations and determination of iso -foot candles, electrical load calculations, service cabinet design and preparation of complete PS&E for bidding. Assisted the City in the bidding and construction of the project. Project cost approximately Citv of Bellflower performed project management for the federally funded installation of raised pavement markers on all arterial streets including all federal funded paperwork. Citv of West Hollvwood performed project management for the federally funded crosswalk textured pavement and in -pavement lighting on Sunset Boulevard. Plan checking • Performed plan checking for the City of Rosemead, City of Alhambra, City of Bellflower, City of La Habra Heights, City of Commerce, City of San Bernardino, City of Pomona, & City of South Pasadena for street, traffic signal, striping, TIA, & street lighting. Citv Engineering • Provided City Engineering services on a consulting basis for the City of Rosemead (City engineer), City of Alhambra (Assistant City Engineer), City of La Habra Heights (Assistant City engineer), City of Commerce (Acting City Engineer), and City of Pomona (extension of Staff). UL1E MULROONEY, PE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE EDUCATION 1985 California State Polytechnic University Pomona, CA B.S., Civil Engineering. Graduated with Honors REGISTRATION REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, CA #C47642 10 of 14 =ii_' Fofz�h. inc SR2S, Safe Routes To School Project at Nine separate schools located at the intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: TASK DESCRIPTION 90% design review 100% design review Final Design Approval ' Total Final Design IV. SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE Final Specs & Cost estimate ' TOTAL SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE V. UTILITY COORDINATION Underground Utility coordination with the utilities companies for Gas, Water, Sewer, Storm water, Telephone, Cable, Fire TOTAL UTILITY COORDINATION VI. Reimbursables such as printing, shipping, Fees paid to utility companies, etc... -ESTIMATE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEE FOR TASK I thru VI FEE 4 ESTIMATED RATE PER HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION 16 $8500 16 $85.00 12 $85.00 15 $85.00 8 $80.00 OPTIONAL Al. BID & AWARD Assist in answerinq questions from Bidders & City Staff 4 $85.00 Assist in Preparinq Bid Addenda 4 $8500 Review of bids & make recommendations on award of Contract 6 $8500 TOTAL BID & AWARD (Allowance) VIII. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PHASE Attend Pre -Construction Conference 4 $8500 Responding to RFPs (allowance) 8 $85.00 Submittal review (allowance) 12 $85.00 Provide As -Built Drawings 6 $80.00 Total Construction Administrative Phase (Allowance) TOTAL I $1,360.00 $1.360.00 $1,020.00 $6,460.00 I $1.275.00 1 $1,275.00 $640.00 $640.00 $750.00 $19,665.00 $34000 $340.00 $510.00 $1,190.00 $340.00 $68000 $1,02000 $48000 $2,520.00 CLARIFICATIONS & EXCLUSIONS 1.Our proposal does not include utility relocation design plans such as water lines, sewer lines, or storm drain lines 2. Any governmental agency fees, application fees, plan check fees, or any other fees that must be paid to any other parties 13 of 14 SR2S; Safe Routes To School Project at Nine separate schools located at the intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cleverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff in the City of Temple City TASK DESCRIPTION FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: I FEE ESTIMATED RATE PER HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS I LOCATION TOTAL 3. Excludes Construction surveying including horizontal control plan, construction management and inspection (unless optional items are approved and included in contract). 4. On site Hydraulics, retaining walls structural calculations, structural calculations 5. Easements, legal descriptions, LLA, etc... 6. Traffic impact Analysis and Traffic Control Plans 7. Obtaminq siqnatures from other Parties on plans, application forms, clearance documents, or other documents. 8. Major Changes to the layout after the plans is 50% or more complete 9. The cost of any other professional services that may be required such as, but not limited to soils engineer, geologist, landscape architect, architects, and electrical engineer other than what is indicated and /or title report. EFI will meet the schedule of 50 working days as described in the RFP QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) PROGRAM & VALUE ENGINEERING QA/QC is an important process in EFI's project management. This process provide an objective review of the work done by different professional at various milestone in the project development. This check is provided by a senior engineer with experience in the specific project type. We understands that the quality, accuracy and correctness of the products prepared by EFI is our full responsibility. EFI Engineers, Inc. approaches value engineering as a continuous and evolving function throughout the entire preliminary and design phases of the project. Value engineering is treated as an integral part of developing design criteria and ultimate incorporation into the project plans, specifications and estimates. Even during the first site visits, we're always considering alternatives and developing ideas that may be analyzed during the course of the project. This significantly reduces the chance of a major design alternative being identified by a 'value engineering team" after the project is designed, which would cause a tremendous redesign effort and considerable time delays. Staffing and Resources Management EFI has necessary staffing, equipment and resources to undertake project assignments and complete them within required schedule. rraPosatr r sRzs-re.pk Ciry.do, 14 of 14 Eh, Fmra7r, h7c ATTACHMENT D CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT Preparation of PS&E for Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Cycle 10 Project By and Between THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation and ELIE FARAH, INC. RN #4822-7870-4520 vl -1- AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA AND ELIE FARAH, INC. (Preparation of PS&E for SR2S Cycle 10 Project) This Agreement for Consultant Services ("Agreement") is entered into as of this 16th day of July, 2013 by and between the City of TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation ("City") and Elie Farah, Inc., a Corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. City has sought, by request for proposals, the performance of the design and engineering services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Consultant was selected by the City on the basis of Consultant's demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. D. Pursuant to the City of Temple City's Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Consultant Services Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this Agreement. E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT. Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the scope of services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit "A." Should the scope of services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Consultant shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement pursuant to Section 21 of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Consultant to continue performing the scope of services until such services are complete. AIV #3822-7830-4520 v1 - I - SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," which is incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to or outside of those set forth in this Agreement or listed in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or City Manager of City. Consultant shall be compensated for any such additional services in the amounts and in the manner agreed to by the City Council or City Manager. SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. (a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit `B" "Compensation," which is incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed nineteen thousand six hundred sixty five dollars, ($19,665.00), unless additional compensation is approved in writing by the City Council or City Manager. (b) Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub -category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub -consultant contracts. Sub -consultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit `B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. (c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant's correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE. RIV 44822-7830-4520 v1 - 2 - City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant's work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Consultant's work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Consultant's work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City's acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Consultant's work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, sections 16 and 17, pertaining to indemnification and insurance, respectively. SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Consultant. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warrants related to Standard of Performance and found in Section 9 of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 7. CONSULTANT'S BOOKS AND RECORDS. (a) Consultant shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Consultant's performance of services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. (b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. RN #4822-78304520 V1 - 3 - (c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City and that such documents and records be maintained by the requesting party. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors -in -interest and authorized representatives. SECTION 8. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. (a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Consultant , nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this Section 9, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria are set forth in the Scope of Work that shall also be applicable to Consultants work under this Contract. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warranties related to Standard of Performance shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, Rrv#3822J83o-4x20 vi - 4 - drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES. Consultant shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section. SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS It is the understanding of City and Consultant that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, "construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work. SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement. SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et sec., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City. SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. (a) Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant's performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all RN #4822-7830-4520 vi -5- times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant will, perform non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the scope of work under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered 'voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Indemnification by Desien Professional. As provided under Civil Code Section 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its R1V 44822-7830-4520 vl - 6 - officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims. actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders, judgments, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, (collectively "Claims") to the extent same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub - consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement, with the understanding that in the event Claims are found by the trier of fact to have been caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the City and its contractors and consultants, and Consultant, damages and expenses from both indemnity and duty to defend obligations shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence. (b) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -consultant / contract or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. (c) Citv's Sole Neelieence. The provisions of this Section 16 do not apply to Claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. SECTION 17. INSURANCE. Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "C" "Insurance," which is incorporated herein by this reference. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Consultant agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request. SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT. The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant's duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Council. Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including sunmiary termination of this R1V #4822-7830-4520 v1 - 7 - Agreement. City acknowledges, however, that Consultant, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors. SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. (a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Consultant. In the event such notice is given, Consultant shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City. (c) If either Consultant or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Consultant, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Consultant or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Consultant's possession shall be returned to City. Consultant shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Consultant, prepared as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. SECTION 21. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS. Consultant shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. RFV #4822-7830-4520 v1 - 8 - Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes. SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement. SECTION 24. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To City: City of Temple City Attn: City Manager 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 To Consultant: Elie Farah, Inc. 1593 Liberty Drive Corona, CA 92881 Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represents and warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative, following approval of this Agreement by the City Council. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make minor amendments to this Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not materially change the Agreement or make a commitment of additional funds of the City. All other changes, modifications, and amendments shall require the prior approval of the City Council. R1V#4922-7830-4520 v1 -9- SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. SECTION 28. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. SECTION 29. WAIVER. Waiver by any parry to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Los Angeles. SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES. In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other Agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Consultant and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other Agreements, whether oral or written, made by any party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid and binding unless in writing duly executed by the parties or their authorized representatives. SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of RN #4822-78304520 v1 -10- this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement sball be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, this Agreement on the date and year first -above written. F -"MFA Peggy Kuo City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FOR:11 By: l=ric S. Vail City Attorney LIM Its: By: CITY OF TEMPLE CITY By: Its: Jose Pulido, City Manager NOTE: CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURES SHALL, BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE RF,QUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICA13LE TO DEVELOPER'S BUSINESS ENTITY. RTV 44822-7830-4520 v - 11 - CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNONVLEDGM ENT SPATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On _ , before me, , personally appeared , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJ URY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL, ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEES) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ O FHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) RIV #4822-78304520 A DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER TI IAN NAMED ABOVE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On _ _ _ _ _ before me, personally appeared ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is,/are subscribed to the within instrument and aclmowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his'herltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his,hen'their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SIGNA PURI'. OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLES) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ oTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING`: ('NAME OF PERSON(S) ORENTITY(IFS)) RIV -4822-783e-4520 v7 DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIG NER(S) OTHER TUAN NAMED ABOVE 6876 v1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following Services: A. The scope of work for the project includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1 of the RFP. B. Provided all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. C. Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. D. Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create a base map of existing conditions. E. Prepare plans and details F. Prepare specifications. G. Prepare cost estimates. H. Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. 1. Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. J. Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Final Product: PS&E Bid Package ready for bidding, including 1 wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, MsWord file of specifications, Excel file Estimates, pdf file of all other documents. III. During performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Provide bi-weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. RN #4822-7830-4520 v1 A-1 6876 v1 B. Attend 3 project meetings. IV. The tangible work products and status reports will be delivered to the City pursuant to the following schedule: A. Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: • First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. • City will take 2 weeks for the review. • Final submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review continents. V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. Elie Farah, PE, TE Civil Engineer/Traffic Engineer B. Julie Mulrooney, PE Design Engineer VI. AMENDMENT The Scope of Services, including services, work products, and personnel, are subject to change by mutual Agreement. In the absence of mutual Agreement regarding the need to change any aspects of performance, Consultant shall comply with the Scope of Services as indicated above. RN #4822-7830-4520 v1 ON EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall use the following rates of pay in the performance of the Services: SR2S, Safe Routes To School Project at Nine separate schools located at the intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: TASK DESCRIPTION I, Preliminary Project Design & Planning +� Utility and data research Field WorklTopograohic Survey Site Lavout/Site Study Total Preliminary Project Design & Planning IL Preliminary Design In pavement lighting system Sidewalks improvements Striping & signing Cost estimate 50% design review I Total Preliminary Design III. Final Design In pavement lighting system. sidewalk Improvements, Signing & striping RIV #4822-7830-4520 vl B-1 FEE ESTIMATED RATE PER HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL 10 $85.00 $850.00 24 $a5.00 $2,040.00 32 $85.00 $2,720.00 $5,610.00 16 $85.00 $1,360.00 16 $85.00 $1,360.00 16 $85.00 $1,360.00 6 $85.00 $510.00 4 $85.00 $340.00 $4,930.00 32 $85.00 $2,720.00 SR2S, Safe Routes To School Project at Nine separate schools located at the intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff in the City of Temple City Tasks: TASK DESCRIPTION FEE PROPOSAL 90% design review I 100% design review Final Design Approval I Total Final Design IV. SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE Final Specs & Cost estimate I I TOTAL SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE I V. UTILITY COORDINATION Underground Utility coordination with the utilities companies for Gas, Water, Sewer, Storm water, Telephone, Cable, Fire TOTAL UTILITY COORDINATION VI. Reimbursables such as printing, shipping, Fees paid to utility companies, etc... -ESTIMATE I TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEE FOR TASK I thru VI OPTIONAL VII. BID & AWARD Assist in answering questions from Bidders & City Staff Assist in Preparing Bid Addenda Review of bids & make recommendations on award of Contract I TOTAL BID & AWARD (Allowance) Vlll. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PHASE FEE $85.00 $1,275.00 ESTIMATED RATE PER $1,275.00 I HOURS OR HOUR OR 1 $640.001 LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL 16 $85.00 $1,360.00 16 $85.00 $1,360.00 12 $85.00 $1,020.00 $6,460.00 15 $85.00 $1,275.00 $340.00 Respondma to RFI's (allowance) $1,275.00 I 8 $80.00 1 $640.001 12 $85.00 $640.00 Provide As -Built Drawings 6 $750.001 I $480.00 Total Construction Administrative Phase (Allowance) $19,665.001 1 4 $85.00 1 $340.00 4 $85.00 $340.00 6 $85.00 $510.00 1 $1,190.00 1 I Attend Pre -Construction Conference 4 $85-00 $340.00 Respondma to RFI's (allowance) 8 $85.00 $680.00 Submittal review (allowance) 12 $85.00 $1,020.00 Provide As -Built Drawings 6 $80.00 $480.00 Total Construction Administrative Phase (Allowance) $2,520.00 CLARIFICATIONS & EXCLUSIONS 1.Our or000sal does not include utility relocation design plans such as water lines, sewer lines, or storm drain lines 2. Any governmental agency fees, application fees, plan check fees, or any other fees that must be paid to any other parties RIV 44822-7830-4520 vl B-2 SR2S, Safe Routes To School Project at Nine separate schools located at the intersections of Longden and Oak; Camino Real and Oak; Temple City and Lemon; Muscatel and Emperor; Broadway and Noel; La Rosa and Rio Hondo; Broadway and Cloverly; Daleview and Grand; and Longley and Woodruff in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: FEE ESTIMATED RATE PER TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL 3. Excludes Construction surveying including horizontal control plan, construction management and inspection (unless optional items are approved and included in contract). 4. On site Hydraulics, retaining walls structural calculations, structural calculations __ I 5. Easements, legal descriptions, LLA, etc... 6. Traffic impact Analysis and Traffic Control Plans 7. Obtaining signatures from other parties on plans, application forms, clearance documents, or other documents. 8. Major Chanaes to the layout after the plans is 60% or more complete 9- The cost of any other professional services that may be required such as, but not limited to soils engineer, geologist, landscape architect, architects, and electrical engineer other than what Is Indicated and /or title report. II. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all supplies properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all travel properly charged to the Services. D. Line items for all equipment properly charged to the Services. E. Line items for all materials properly charged to the Services. F. Line items for all subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $19,665.00, as provided in Section 4 of this Agreement. RN #4822-7830-3520 vt RA EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE A. Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City Manager or City Counsel, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than ANIL Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: 1. Minimum Scone of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a "claims made" basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 3 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant's services or the tennination of this Agreement. During this additional 3 -year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. 2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of professional liability insurance no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. B. Other Provisions. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except atter 30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City. C. Other Requirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract, certiticates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 1. Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides. 2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. RIV #3822-7830-3520 yr C -I 3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. R1V 44822-7830-4520 vl C'_2