Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2021.06.10 Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTES McCall City Council Regular Meeting McCall City Hall -- Legion Hall VIA TEAMS Virtual June 10, 2021 Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Agenda Consent Agenda Staff Introductions Chamber Department Reports Public Comment Business Agenda Adjournment CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Mayor Giles called the regular meeting of the McCall City Council to order at 5:30 p.m. Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, Council Member Holmes, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all answered roll call. City staff members present were Anette Spickard, City Manager; Bill Nichols, City Attorney; BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk; Kurt Wolf, Parks and Recreation Director; Rick Stein, Airport Manager; Eric McCormick, Golf Course Superintendent; Meg Lojek, Library Director; Traci Malvich, Human Resources Manager; Justin Williams, Police Chief; Nathan Stewart, Public Works Director; Police Officer Jerry Tatum; Police Officer Jack Pape; Police Officer Roger Picard Also, in attendance were Lindsey Harris, McCall Area Chamber of Commerce and Regan Berkley, Idaho Fish & Game Mayor Giles led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVE THE AGENDA Council Member Maciaszek moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a voice vote all members voted aye, and the motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 1 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting Staff recommended approval of the following ACTION ITEMS. All matters which are listed within the consent section of the agenda have been distributed to each member of the McCall City Council for reading and study. Items listed are considered routine by the Council and were enacted with one motion. 1. Payroll Report for period ending May 28, 2021 2. Warrant Register – GL 3. Warrant Register – Vendor 4. Accept the Minutes of the following Committees a. Golf Advisory Committee – March 10, 2021 b. Housing Advisory Committee – July 27, 2020 c. Housing Advisory Committee – August 24, 2020 d. Housing Advisory Committee – September 28, 2020 e. Housing Advisory Committee – October 26, 2020 f. Housing Advisory Committee – November 30, 2020 g. Housing Advisory Committee – December 28, 2020 h. Library Board of Trustees – April 12, 2021 i. Local Option Tax Commission – April 1, 2021 j. Local Option Tax Commission – May 11, 2021 k. Local Option Tax Commission – May 12, 2021 l. Public Art Advisory Committee – April 26, 2021 m. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee – February 3, 2021 n. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee – March 17, 2021 o. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee – April 21, 2021 p. Tree Advisory Committee – April 6, 2021 1. AB 21-159 City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Code: Per McCall City Code Title 4 Chapter 9, the City Council has determined the City Clerk shall be delegated the authority to process and grant or deny all alcoholic beverage license applications, other than certain circumstances involving catering permits, which the City Clerk shall review the application for catering permit for completeness and forward said application to the Police Chief. The Police Chief upon receipt of the application shall make a recommendation to the City Clerk to approve or deny the application. Whenever the City Clerk shall determine that an application for alcoholic beverage license transfer or renewal is complete, the City Clerk shall approve or deny such application. All decisions of the City Clerk shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after such decision. The City Clerk is also responsible for all processing of business, taxi, snow removal, pawnbroker, child daycare licenses, vendor permits, and public event applications. Action: Council to review the License report. 5. AB 21-157 Request to Approve the Chamber of Commerce July 4, 2021, Fireworks Display Permit: The McCall Area Chamber of Commerce is submitting a request for a firework display permit. They have executed an agreement with Garden State Fireworks, Inc. for conducting a firework display over Payette Lake. The attached application has been approved by both the Police Chief and the Fire Chief. Action: Approve the firework display permit for July 4, 2021 and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents. 6. AB 21-161 Request for Local Housing Incentive Program: Reimbursement Request for Thompson Place Condominiums, Units 5 and 6: The Thompson Place Condominiums located on Thompson Street were platted with 12 of the 16 units as deed restricted local MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 2 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting housing. The McCall City Council adopted Resolution 19-02, Local Housing Incentive Program, that created a reimbursement incentive program for projects that meet the criteria of a deed restriction. Attached are units 5 and 6 that have executed the Deed Restriction for the Units with the new owners. Units 9 and 11 of the Thompson Place Condominiums with deed restrictions were previously approved by City Council. The deed restrictions have been reviewed by the City Attorney. Action: Approve the request for reimbursement of the amount of $10,000 each through the Local Housing Incentive Program for Units 5 and 6 of the Thompson Place Condominiums and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Council Member Nielsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Nielsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried. STAFF INTRODUCTIONS AB 21-162 Introduction of New Police Department Staff Police Chief Justin Williams and Lieutenant Dallas Palmer presented the introduction of the three of four new members of the McCall Police Department: Jerry Tatum, from Florida, is a 10-year army veteran whose last position before coming here was a felony probation officer. Jack Pape, also a marine veteran is from Star, Idaho. Both Officer Tatum and Office Pape have completed POST and field training. Roger Picard also from Florida and Marine Corps, was a Sheriff Deputy for 6 years. The department is at full staff for the first time in at least eight years. The Council welcomed the new officers. CHAMBER & DEPARTMENT REPORTS Chamber of Commerce Lindsey Harris of McCall Area Chamber of Commerce gave a brief update to the Council. She shared the Elaine Haas Award recipients have been selected, Board elections are coming up, they th launched the McCall Promise, and she announce the July 4 Guide deadline. Department Reports The Council thanked staff for their thorough reports. Per Council Member Nielsen’s request, Public Works Direct Nathan Stewart gave a brief update on Spring Mountain Blvd and shared the hope is that the paving will be completed before the holiday weekend. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Giles called for public comment at 5:42 p.m. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 3 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting City Clerk BessieJo Wagner provided a summary of the comments received. The comments will be included at the end of the minutes as Attachment 1: Council received 24 comments representing 22 members of the community. 9 Members of the community were in favor of the Ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife, and 13 members expressed they were against the ordinance, however, many of the against comments were against the killing or moving of the deer, not necessarily the prohibition on the feeding of wildlife. No verbal comments were given. Hearing no further comments, Mayor Giles closed the comment period. BUSINESS AGENDA AB 21-163 Request for Council to Review a Draft Ordinance Regarding Prohibiting the Feeding of Wildlife Police Chief Justin Williams presented the review of a Draft Ordinance regarding prohibiting the feeding of wildlife. On May 27, 2021, Council directed staff to continue with preparation of a proposed ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife within the City of McCall. In cooperation with Idaho Fish and Game (IFG), staff has created the included draft ordinance for review and discussion. Chief Williams clarified that the ordinance is strictly an ordinance regarding feeding of wildlife. The City will defer to IFG for what they choose to do with the wildlife. Council Member Holmes expressed concern for the following three statements in the ordinance and gave her reasons: #1 “WHEREAS, the intentional feeding of wildlife can alter natural behavior so far as to endanger public safety and require relocation or euthanasia of habituated animals” Council Member Holmes feels that although this ordinance is primarily for prohibition of feeding wildlife, she wanted to be clear that she is totally against killing the deer. Police Chief Williams clarified that this language will not be in the ordinance as the draft presented was written in a resolution format which is not how an ordinance is written. He agreed that the City is not in the business of relocation and euthanasia of wildlife. #2 5.7.400 B3 – Edible material located in a residence, closed vehicle, fully enclosed storage structure, or in an enclosed trash container, where the owner or person in charge has taken reasonable measures to restrict access by wildlife. Council Member Holmes was also concerned about “the intent to lure” language of 5.7.400 B3 and Police Chief Williams clarified that this is specifically regarding hunting. Council Member Holmes wants that to be called out specifically, so it is clearer for the public. She would also like MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 4 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting some language regarding overloading of trash cans written in with some enforcement piece, so it has teeth to deal with violators. #3 5.7.400 B7 – Persons who are engaged in a lawful trapping activity allowing edible bait with all appropriate licenses and/or permits from Idaho Department of Fish and Game and according to both State of Idaho and City of McCall rules and regulations for such trapping activity; and activities that include lawful recreational trapping of wildlife and lawful trapping of nuisance wildlife by both the public and authorized agents of the State of Idaho, the City of McCall, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services. Council Member Holmes feels this section should be removed completely as it should be a separate conversation. City Attorney Bill Nichols stated that if this section gets removed this could create a political firestorm. Regan Berkley, representative of IFG, stated that the State does not have any regulation regarding trapping, and it is up to cities to make those regulations. Police Chief Williams clarified that this language is there to show that the City does not prohibit lawful fish and game activities that are following the State regulations and guidelines. Council Member Holmes asked that at what point would the City be involved in any trapping and relocation by IFG of which Ms. Berkley shared they would certainly involve the City in those conversations. Ms. Berkley addressed the louse issue and stated the issue in McCall is different from the issue in the City of Riggins as those deer were very infested and the deer in McCall are just beginning to show infestation. She stated that it is difficult to assess from afar, so IFG will have a veterinary on site to evaluate each deer that is captured to determine if there is a lice issue before transport. th Council Member Holmes stated she would like a 4 touch on this item as the Council has not seen the final ordinance yet and she does not want to make a hasty decision. City Attorney Nichols asked Ms. Berkley to clarify the migration patterns. Ms. Berkley explained how the winter feeding stops deer from naturally migrating to lower climes where there is food. City Attorney Nichols then shared he had asked that question of IFG to determine how much time was available before the adoption of the ordinance is required and for education. He stated there is plenty of time to get it right. Council Member Nielsen wanted to know if there is any influence the City has on what operations FG will carry out. City Attorney Nichols asked for clarification of and spoke to what would happen to the deer if the ordinance was passed but not relocated. Ms. Berkley talked about the issues of what would happen if an ordinance were passed and IFG did not trap and relocate the deer. She stated that there is some food available, but it would quickly disappear with the snow and the deer would basically starve and die. She stated that the most humane and responsible thing to do is to trap and relocate them. Police Chief Williams reiterated the dilemma brought up by both the City Attorney and IFG is right on point, and he defers to the wildlife biologist experts to give guidance and make those decisions. He pointed out humans have created this problem of the deer being dependent for food. He feels it is important to work closely with IFG and be supportive to solve this problem. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 5 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting Mayor Giles gave a recap and reminded the Council this ordinance is specifically addressing wildlife feeding. Council Member Nielsen asked for Ms. Berkley’s view of the success of the relocating of deer. She shared success would be trapping and relocating as many as possible with the hope that all trapped would be healthy enough to be relocated to the winter herd. She cannot offer a specific survival rate at this time. Council Member Nielsen also asked if trapping is legal in the City. Police Chief Williams stated that it is legal to trap but hunting is not. Mayor Giles asked to stick to the topic and not start on an off topic. Council Member Maciaszek agrees with staying on topic and appreciated Ms. Berkley’s explanation. City Attorney Nichols asked for a definition of squirrels and Police Chief Williams stated all squirrels. Council Member Callan agrees with item #3 in defining what is prohibited with the trash issues and has some qualms with the euthanasia but agrees with relocating. Police Chief Williams gave more explanation of what #3 is trying to accomplish and overflowing trash is covered in another part of the code. City Attorney Nichols stated it could be worded that an overflowing trash can, not properly covered by a lid, could be determined as not reasonable. Mayor Giles summarized again and asked staff to finalize the draft ordinance for review/adoption at the next Council meeting. He asked that Police Chief Williams and Ms. Berkley be present for that presentation. An audience member asked if wildlife is traumatized by the relocation. Ms. Berkley addressed the question by stating animal welfare is their top priority and they routinely trap and relocate animals and have been doing it for many years. The amount of trauma mostly depends on the animal. AB 21-160 Request Approval of Resolution 21-22 to Surplus and Sell Personal Property – Taser X26 Tasers and accessories Police Chief Justin Williams presented Resolution 21-22 to surplus and sell department personal property – Taser X26 Tasers and accessories. Idaho Code §67-5732A allows the conveyance of surplus personal property to other state and local agencies. Annually City staff identifies several items as surplus property. He has determined that eight (8) Taser X26 Tasers and accessories are no longer of use to the City of McCall, and he would like to sell the X26 Tasers to Accredited Security and receive a credit up to $1,400.00. Staff has determined that it is in the best interest of the Police Department to sell the X26 to the nationally known distributor that possesses the equipment to repurpose rather than destroy them. The Council did not have any questions of staff. Council Member Callan moved to adopt Resolution 21-22 declaring the 8 X26 Tasers and accessories as surplus, authorizing the Police Chief to sell the 8 X26 Tasers and accessories to Accredited Security and sign the sales agreement, and authorize the mayor to sign the Resolution. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 6 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting Member Callan, Council Member Maciaszek, Mayor Giles, Council Member Holmes, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried. AB 21-156 Application for the Idaho Airport Aid Program (IAAP) Airport Manager Rick Stein presented the application for the Idaho Airport Aid Program. The Idaho State Division of Aeronautics is currently accepting applications for the Idaho Airport Aid Program (IAAP). The IAAP will fund projects that did not receive a high National Priority Rating from the Federal Aviation Administration. Such projects may include snow removal equipment, buildings, fencing, and other hard to fund projects. The State has a recommended a funding request limit of $300,000 and plans on funding projects on a 90% State/10% local split. Final grant amounts and financing shares will be announced by the State as all grant applications are received and reviewed. Staff has identified the need to purchase snow removal equipment due to the aging fleet that has succeeded the expected operational use/life cycle. The current snow blower unit is a 31-year-old Rolba 3,000 tons per hour (tph) blower. The Rolba has proven unreliable in the past few years with frequent breakdowns, requiring longer airport closures for snow removal. The new equipment would consist of a front-end loader mounted snow blower unit capable of at least 3000 tons per hour. Based upon similar equipment purchased at other airports, the expected cost is $280,000 - $260,000 in equipment purchases, and $20,000 for administrative costs (specifications, bid package, etc). Council Member Holmes moved to approve the Application for the Idaho Airport Aid Program for new snow removal equipment and authorize the mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Callan seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Holmes, Council Member Callan, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried. AB 21-158 Request to Adopt Resolution 21-23 Intent to Reimburse Authorized Reimbursable Expenditures from the Library Bond Fund City Manager Anette Spickard presented Resolution 21-23 Intent to reimburse authorized reimbursable expenditures from the Library Bond Fund. The McCall City Council adopted Ordinance No. 999 calling for a bond election for the Library Expansion Project on March 11, 2021. The bond election was held May 18, 2021, asking the voters of McCall whether the City should issue general obligation bonds of up to $4,200,000 for the library project. The required two- thirds (2/3) majority of the electors cast votes in favor of issuing the bonds. The City intends to incur and pay for reimbursable expenditures from the Library Bond Fund, and it is the City’s intent to be reimbursed for the expenditures from the bond proceeds. Adopting the resolution of Intent officially declares the City’s intention to be reimbursed for certain authorized expenditures. The resolution was prepared by bond counsel. The Council did not have any questions of staff. Council Member Maciaszek moved to adopt Resolution No. 21-23 Intent to Reimburse Authorized Reimbursable Expenditures from the Library Bond Fund and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Council Member Holmes seconded the motion. In a MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 7 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting roll call vote Council Member Maciaszek, Council Member Holmes, Mayor Giles, Council Member Callan, and Council Member Nielsen all voted aye, and the motion carried. Covid-19 Update and Review of Mask Metrics Status Police Chief Justin Williams presented the Covid-19 update. He reported that the county is still below average and 3 of the 4 metrics are being met. City Manager Anette Spickard gave an update on the focus of the Covid-19 regional taskforce is now focused on education regarding vaccinations and there is a mobile vaccine vehicle going around to different communities. Upcoming Meetings Schedule Discussion Council discussed upcoming meetings. Council Member Nielsen would like an update from the Housing Advisory Committee. ADJOURNMENT Without further business, Mayor Giles adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m. ATTEST. 0 : obert S. Giles, Mayor 1 PAW BessieJo Wagfier, City Verk MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 8 of 8 June 10, 2021 Regular Meeting 06/09/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 1 of 3 1 6/3/21 18:10:26 David Simmonds 506 Sunset St, PO Box 287, McCall ID 83638 For Please prohibit feeding of deer, and work with IDFG to reduce the herds drastically. Overpopulation of deer in our part of town is a serious menace and has had a major financial cost for us. This spring, a deer being chased by a loose dog in the neighborhood darted out of a side street, struck my stopped vehicle at a full run and caused significant damage. In recent years as deer herds in town have increased, we have spent hundreds of dollars on deer repellent to save our trees, shrubs and gardens. But it's always temporary and seems they will soon eat almost everything they can reach, including "deer hardy" plants. Two weeks ago in frustration I spent almost $400 on 7 foot deer netting. Prior to that, we watched deer easily jump over a 5' wire fence around our vegetable garden. Our yard now has some protection but feels and looks a bit like a prison. This has to end. Thank you. 2 6/3/21 20:36:09 Faye Thompson 13828 Shadow Ridge, McCall Against Leave the deer where they are. Increase education about not feeding. Signs about it in areas where it is known they are being fed. Generations of deer are in town. It is an endearing feature here and should be left alone. The mountain lion has been around for many years. 3 6/4/21 12:50:44 Roger gossi 1200 Aspen ridge ln For Deer have been a problem for years. Feeding them isn’t good for deer or McCall. Tourist love to see them like we do but they need to become wild again. Same for all the furry creatures. Birds are just fine. Thanks and have been a resident off and on since 1957. 4 6/7/21 9:08:46 Karen Bouch 704 Reedy Lane, McCall Idaho For Please vote in support of this proposed ordinance. We support McCall Police Dept. and local Fish and Game in the need to curb the cities deer population. We know first had the destruction of personal property that is being done. Please drive by and take a look. The City of McCall, should look to other resort communities in the state. It is one of the only in the state NOT to have an Nuicance ordinance for feeding of wildlife in city limits. Thank you 5 6/7/21 15:07:15 Karen Hornfelt 4014 Fairway Drive Lewiston ID 83501 Against "Just read an article in the Lewiston Tribune that the mayor and city council are discussing the moving of the ""town"" mule deer. The wildlife is one of the reasons why we love visiting McCall every year in the spring and fall. McCall is a mountain town, not an urban city. Do your part in helping to maintain this mountain town and it's four legged inhabitants. Educate people on how not to feed the elk and deer; how not to leave garbage cans open for the bears, fox and raccoons; how not to leave dog and cat food on porches. People choose to move to McCall because of it's beauty and natural setting. It's not the fault of the animals, it's human err. Wildlife have lived there long before humans. If people want to change the beauty of this mountain town, then they probably should just stay in the city. McCall is not an urban city. Do not stress-out and move these deer. The McCall wilderness is their home. Not everyone goes to McCall to eat, drink and be merry. Many go for the serenity and to be with nature. Thank you for your time. " ATTACHMENT 1 06/09/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 2 of 3 6 6/7/21 17:14:31 Sharon Tucker 1022 Evergreen Dr., McCall, ID 83638 For I’ve seen an adult teaching small children to feed deer from the palm of their hands while the buck is rearing to get to the food! Crazy!! 7 6/8/21 12:37:31 Colleen Bright Ross PO Box 510, McCall, ID Against "Dear Council Members, The proposals to move or cull our ""town deer"" makes me very sad. It is a cruel ""solution"" to a falsely-framed ""problem."" Long before McCall existed as a town, the deer were here. So were the predators (cougar and wolves, even no doubt). Then, we built our town. The problem is not the town deer, but the town itself. There is no evidence that I am aware of that our mule deer migrated to lower elevations in the winter. It's a tricky, almost impossible journey from our valley floor to Riggins, Council or the lowest reaches of the North Fork of the Payette River. In all likelihood, our town deer wintered over on our very own valley floor. And what have we done to their wintering grounds: built houses, roads and fences everywhere. This has limited their food supply, made it very difficult for them to move around the valley floor so they can browse and feed without getting caught up in fences, hit by cars or worse. The impulse to feed deer is not a widespread issue: a few people in town feed some of the deer a few months in the depths of winter, when forage is limited or non-existent. There would be much more food for the deer during winter if we hadn't built houses and roads everywhere?! If it is ok to feed songbirds (another population in decline due to human activity), why not deer, we should be asking ourselves? Instead of culling the town deer, we should try to live together more peacefully with them: instead of driving 35 mph on roads posted 20 mph, follow the speed limits. Whether to avoid humans, pets or deer, people should SLOW down while driving in town. The city could and should post more signs reminding motorists that there are pets, wildlife and humans on or next to roadways? Maybe some signs that just say ""watch out for humans and wildlife""?! As for the damage to gardens, and we all love our gardens, people might try putting out deer repellant or deer resistant plants? Cayenne, commercially available repellant sprays, and fences (where permitted) all work very well for keeping deer out of gardens. Become a better, more ""mountain savvy"" gardener. As for the burden on the police department, we have seen plenty of house pets and occasionally bicyclists hit by cars, as well. Do we want to ban them? And then there is the alleged lice/mite/ skin infestation problem: those do exist in town, but they also exist outside town. Lice infestations are not unique to the town deer: they happen to all ""herding"" deer populations. The reason lice, skin and wasting disease spreads in deer populations is precisely because they are herd animals, not because the herd lives in town. The Department of Fish and Game ought to be thinking broadly about making our deer, elk and other browsing herds more healthy everywhere, not just killing town deer to appease a small segment of town dwellers unhappy because they can't leave their gardens unattended at their second homes. Let's try and have some concern for all of god's creatures, not just ourselves?" 06/09/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 3 of 3 8 6/8/21 18:44:19 Eddie and Danielle Gray 705 Reedy lane Against We are against transporting or killing town deer, deer do what deer do, and they have been here far longer than we have. 9 6/9/21 6:31:58 Dean Gard 1600 Lawrence Dr. McCall, ID 83638 Against I oppose the plan to transport or kill any of the town deer. 10 6/9/21 15:28:49 Debra Staup ikaria@mac.com Against I am against rushing this through. I feel enough research hasn't been done. Please refer to the email letter I sent to each council member and to the City Manager. In my letter, I shared the results of some of my research and what other places have done. I believe we need to slow down and consider better options. Eradicating the deer either by trapping and relocating them or killing them is costly and has proven unsuccessful and even inhumane to the deer. Our deer should not be punished for what is a human caused problem. The deer and all our wildlife were here first. We need to look at and implement better options. Again, please refer to my letter and hopefully we can be proactive instead reactive. Thank you. 06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 1 of 6 11 6/9/21 19:47:57 Daniel O'Malley 1535 McCall Avenue Against "Dan O'Malley The city wants to ban the feeding of all wildlife within city limits, with the exception of wild bird feeding. The local deer can sometimes be a problem due to being fed and eating from people's yards and gardens. However, I first visited McCall back in 1999, and have lived here since 2002, and there have always been large numbers of deer within city limits. Why is the city just now choosing to try to resolve a problem that has existed for decades? What is their reasoning behind only allowing wild birds to be fed? If they are going to ban feeding wildlife in city limits, they shouldn't do a half assed job of it, and should ban the feeding of birds as well. I used to feed the birds all the time, but have not done so for several years. This is because of the huge problems wild bird feeding can cause. It not only attracts birds, but it also attracts squirrels, skunks, raccoons, deer, and bears. Will the city propose to eradicate all the wildlife in the future because they sometimes pose problems? How is the city going to enforce the feeding ban when the bird feed attracts wildlife other than birds? Is the city going to enforce/cite people for attracting and feeding bird food to other wildlife, even if it was not intentional? Do any of the F&G people, police, mayor, or city council members feed the birds, and are not including feeding them in the ban for their own purposes? I am not trying to be funny with the photos. They show the aftermath of what can happen when a bear rips down a handmade bird feeder, then climbs a 6 foot fence and tears down two more feeders hung 12 feet up a tree, which attracted even more wildlife." 12 6/9/21 19:52:19 Daniel O'Malley 1535 McCall Avenue Against Continued "I was once known as the ""Mad McCall Bomber"". I designed, built, and experimented with homemade explosives, until I was arrested on 09/02/2011. When I was released on 12/08/2011, I swore to myself that I would never go back down that long dark roadway, towards self destruction. Instead, I took up the camera that I used to express myself many years prior. My subjects were the urban wild animals that lived around me, and that I loved photographing. Unfortunately, back in 2015, I was lied to by Dallas Palmer of the McCall Police Department. He specifically told me that feeding wild animals within city limits was illegal. He emphasized that if I continued to do so, that I would be cited and my probation violated so that I would end up back in jail. He suggested at that time that if I had questions, I should contact Idaho Fish & Game for verification. I did exactly that the next day, and was told that there were no (zero) regulations/ordinances prohibiting the feeding of urban wildlife in the McCall area. I stopped feeding any wildlife at that point, even though I read the entire McCall Civil Code, and also found no mention of the illegality of feeding wildlife within city limits. I was quite pissed off due to being lied to directly by a member of our local police department, and when my Probation Officer, Mike Truxel, told me he would not enforce a probation violation (I had him verify my findings with Idaho F&G and McCall City Code), I knew then and there that Dallas was lying about what he told me. Less than two weeks later, former McCall Police Detective Brian Koch stopped by my house to tell me that he would issue me a citation if I ever fed the wildlife again. He specifically told me that it was in ""the books"" written that it was illegal to feed wildlife, and if I couldn't find where that fact was documented, that ""that's your own fault"". 06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 2 of 6 Just a factual account since April of 2017: I have had several foxes show up at my house in McCall showing signs of mange. I did a lot of research on how to possibly treat these foxes for their mange conditions. I decided to treat these foxes myself for their mange. I ordered medication online, and carefully followed the directions I found online. (http://www.foxwoodwildliferescue.org/2017/01/05/treating-sarcoptic-mange-in-red-foxes/), and through the fox welfare site in England (National Fox Welfare Society). Since 2017, I have been able to successfully treat 9 of 11 foxes that presented themselves to me with varying degrees of mange infestation. If you ban/prohibit the feeding of wildlife within the city of McCall, you will essentially condemn any fox afflicted with mange to a long, unnecessary, and extremely painful death due to mange. Don't tell me that there are other options available, because our local ""animal welfare"" rehabilitation center (Snowdon) is a joke at best. I have contacted them 6 times to come and assist/help afflicted/injured animals, and they have never once helped at all. It also seems that the only help Id F&G want to provide is a quick bullet to the brain for any wild animal they are called out for." 13 6/10/21 7:45:20 Simon Ingham 1658 Timber Circle McCall ID 83638 For Great idea - I highly approve 14 6/10/21 10:48:30 Marilyn Olson P.O. Box 455 (890 Timber Ridge Ct.), McCall, ID, 83638 For I support an ordinance to prohibit feeding of deer (and other wild animals) in the town of McCall. I have lived in McCall for over 40 years and understand that we have lost a lot of deer habitat due to the increase in buildings and development. Riggins had a deer problem and culled their deer herd and were able to feed several low income families. Transplanting deer seems a bad choice, as 50% mortality occurs with excessive cost. Thank you for your time and consideration. 15 6/10/21 11:03:20 Debra and Jim Staup P.O. Box 1221 Against I entered a comment earlier, but Jim and I both felt we needed to strongly clarify we are against the killing and/or trapping and relocating of our town deer. Please refer to my email sent yesterday to all Council Members and to the City Manager. In it are better and more humane options suggested by wildlife experts in other areas/states. We expect the Council to slow down, gather more complete and balanced information, and to look at this matter very carefully before making a decision that could cause unnecessary harm. The deer should not be punished for a human caused problem. Thank you, Debra and Jim Staup 16 6/10/21 11:56:26 Cherise White 1324 Eagle Dr McCall, Idaho 83638 Against Strongly oppose 17 6/10/21 12:01:20 pat collins 1324 eagle dr mccall idaho 83638 Against I am against the removal of the deer from our community, but would like to see people being educated about not feed the wild animals. 18 6/10/21 12:17:17 Jamie Melbo 506 Sunset St McCall, ID For I urge you to adopt this ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife as described in the draft. Wild animals should be respected, observed from a distance, and left alone. Thank you. 06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 3 of 6 19 6/10/21 12:43:27 Dale Allen 914 Chipmunk Lane For "Please add the following Whereas or similiar; Intentional feeding of wildlife causes unnatural aggregations during environmentally stressful times and can led to outbreaks of diseases. I live near Davis and Lick Creek Rd. We are over run with deer in the late summer and fall. We can no longer have any outdoor flowers or plants on our back patio, because deer will mow them down. all foundation plantings around the house have been destroyed. I have easily up to ten deer in my backyard, on my porch and even laying on the concrete floor of the garage. This is all because of winter feeding activities of several individuals on Davis Ave. This ord. is a necessary start but it will be meaningless unless enforced. Also the City must be active in assisting the removal of these deer during early winter when they really gather. This will require resources to clear snow for trapping, providing City properties for trapping and perhaps manpower. This also will likely take several years to be come effective. These town deer will not migrate normally, its been too many generations of staying in town during the winter instead of migrating. If feeding is successfully curtailed the deer's condition will be much reduced, even more damage to citizens landscape plantings will likely occur and there could well be much more deer mortality. thank you" 20 6/10/21 13:25:23 Joe Luff 414 Floyde St. McCall, ID 83638 For This should have been implemented years ago. 21 6/10/21 14:09:50 Mark Dooley 258 Ernesto Against "I know this is a complicated and emotional issues. I would like to remind everyone that people are the ones who moved into the wild lives habitat. We dug and removed their food sources. We eliminated their natural migration routes and now we deem them the problem. I don’t agree with this. Trapping and relocating deer is an exercise is futility and a waste of money. Where do you draw the line for trapping? City limits? Area of impact limits? County limits? What’s to stop the deer on the edge of that limit line to not come over. We learned from the failed wolf introduction decades ago that the wolf doesn’t know to stay where he was put. In regards to a comment in the paper about a majority of the people are feeding deer inappropriate food. I would like a copy of that report. No one polled me to see if I feed the deer. No one asked me what I fed them if I did feed the deer. History proves the deer and elk winter in Donnelly, McCall and New Meadows. The Finnish settlers settled in Donnelly in the winter because the deer and elk where there. New Pearce tribe used the Zims hot springs area because of the hot springs, fish, deer and elk. If Fish and Game is going to address feeding they need to address the big picture. Elk in Donnelly are manipulated and moved by the ranchers that provides the sleigh rides. They have moved that wintering herd from the trees to the fields adjacent 55 by feeding them. Someone will die when hitting an elk on 55 due to their direct efforts to market their business. No one will die hitting a deer at 25mph in front of Albertsons. 06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 4 of 6 I would argue Lardos is feeding the bears with the uncontrolled vent hoods spewing grease onto carpets and causing the direct dependency of the bears to live in the Rio Vista sub. Aggressive bears are dangerous. What will constitute feeding? I feed the birds. Seed falls on the ground and the deer eats the seeds. Do I get a fine? I plant flowers and grow tomatoes. Deer eat those, do I get a fine. I would rather our law enforcement officers enforce the no alcohol ban on the beach during the fourth then write tickets for feeding the bears. A major draw and big part of our quality of life is nature. Our past mayors, city councils and planning and zoning commissioners failed our community by not requiring developers to provide environmental clearance and preservation of migratory routes for wildlife. As a consultant in Boise I did this on every community development I worked on. It’s even required in downtown Bellevue, WA but not McCall. The Cities past short comings managing development should not be passed to the current citizens and the wildlife that are directly affected by those decisions. Thank You Mark Dooley 208-573-4627" 22 6/10/21 14:14:49 Debra and Jim Staup P.O. Box 1221 McCall, Idaho 83638 Against "On May 27, 2021, Council directed staff to continue with preparation of a proposed ordinance prohibiting the feeding of wildlife within the City of McCall." This is quite concerning.. Does the Council want to ban everyone from feeding 'all' wildlife such as birds, humming birds, etc. The language is ambiguous and will cause a firestorm of problems. Clarification is needed. Again, the Council needs to slow down and rethink what is the real objective here. Reactive thinking will not provide a solution to the problem. 23 6/10/21 14:00:54 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive P.O. Box 2755 McCall, ID 83638 Against "Dear City Council, First let me clarify my ""against"" response. Since this ""matter"" came up only in the last week, and since it is not ultimately clear as to what this ""Wildlife Ordinance"" fully entails, here is my clarification statement: 1. I have no problem with there being an ordinance put in place by the City to make it illegal to feed deer and other wildlife within the City limits of McCall. I think that is a good and necessary first step. Therefore, I am in agreement or ""for"" that matter ONLY. 2. What I am FULLY AGAINST however, are the other issue(s) being talked about in the same breath by Regan Berkley, Regional Wildlife Manager with Fish and Game and by local Police Chief Justin Williams to catch/transport/ or euthanize the town deer. Particularly concerning is Ms. Berkley's quote in last weeks Star News: ""There is no effective way to rid the deer of the lice, so infected deer would be humanely killed by Fish and Game to avoid spreading the infestation, she said"". 3. It is very unclear as to which issue we are supposedly making our stance on. JUST the proposed ordinance to make it illegal to feed the deer? OR, several other ordinances regarding trapping, transporting, euthanizing all of the town deer? In speaking with a multitude of friends and 06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 5 of 6 acquaintances this week who live here full time, NOT ONE OF THEM KNEW OF THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE OR THE TALK OF TRAPPING, TRANSPORTING, EUTHANIZING THE TOWN DEER. That is Extremely concerning to me. ***Regarding deer lice: Multiple studies show that lice in deer are not uncommon. These same studies also show that the lice are NOT harmful to humans nor domestic pets, and that the lice rarely kill the deer themselves. ""The exotic lice species described above does not affect humans or domestic animals. Deer in captive settings have been successfully cleared of lice infestations with the use of medication.....Medications exist to treat most conditions causing hair loss in deer... Many cases resolve on their own when the deer are in better condition in spring/summer due to increased food resources or with seasonal environmental changes."""" ~Washington Department of Fish and Game~ ***Regarding the issues of ""traffic hazards"": IF the speed limit in the City of McCall was routinely enforced (20mph and 25mph), and the distracted driving issue was enforced, I think we would find that there would be few car/deer collisions. I spoke by phone this week with the WA State Fish and Game Wildlife Officer, and he stated that ""even at 25mph, most deer survive the collision and do not need to be euthanized"". ***Regarding the attraction of predators: I have been coming to McCall since the early 1960's (summers, winters, weekends, holidays) and have enjoyed McCall with my family at our two cabins (the first in Wagon Wheel Bay off of Warren Wagon Road from 1967 through 1994, and the second in Shady Cove/Pilgrim Cove off of Lick Creek Road from 1994 to 2012. I have been a full time resident of McCall since 2012 and live on the McCall Golf Course. I have never once seen a mountain lion or wolf. I have only seen a coyote in town ONCE (on the golf course) in the past 55+ years. I realize there are ""sightings"" on occasion. Primarily from juvenile mountain lions without a mother, or perhaps a sick/injured lion. The City of Boise has many more sightings than McCall. These are fleeting, and in 55+ years I don't believe there are ""increased"" sightings, but rather an increase in reporting of sightings. Again, these are very rare. I am unaware of ANY documented killings of deer within our City Limits in 55+ years. ***Regarding the ""nuisance"" issue: We live in a beautiful Mountain Resort town where deer have been prevalent for decades and longer. We have taken over their habitat. We have paved over their migration routes and built subdivisions, buildings, parking lots, businesses ON their habitat. Since space is an issue, I will continue with this statement in a 2nd submittal)" 24 6/10/21 14:44:57 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive PO Box 2755 McCall ID 83638 Against "Please see first submittal to this page as of 2:44pm June 10th, 2021. This is the continuation of that statement: ******Regarding the ""nuisance"" issue: We live in a beautiful Mountain Resort town where deer have been prevalent for decades and longer. We have taken over their habitat. We have paved over their migration routes and built subdivisions, buildings, parking lots, businesses ON their habitat. I have 06/10/21 COMMENTS RELATED TO FEEDING WILDLIFE ORDINANCE Page 6 of 6 serious doubts that these town deer have migrated to lower elevations, but would certainly welcome that information. Were the town deer tagged and monitored in the past? Did our town deer simply move to areas outside of our core such as Spring Mountain Ranch? The Woodlands? Lick Creek Meadows during the Winter months and remain unseen. But now that those locations are all paved over with houses, the deer have no other choice but to be ""seen"" in town? It is a blessing and privilege to live amongst the deer and other wildlife here in McCall. It is a primary reason I moved here from Boise. I spent this week talking to Fish and Game Wildlife Officers and Biologists from the States of Washington, Oregon, Utah and Idaho. Our neighboring states have excellent websites and resources to educate the public on ""LIVING WITH WILDLIFE"". Not the ""transport and euthanizing of wildlife"". It was refreshing to hear of and read their education pieces. I am curious what percentage of those complaining to the City of McCall/F & G/The Police Department are complaining about the deer ""eating their gardens, flowers, trees, shrubs""? Why are we accommodating their statements when there are ways to mitigate the deer coming on their property and/or eating their gardens? There are plenty of educational pieces out there. No need to recreate the wheel. ****Finally, I believe that the City has much bigger fish to fry right now: 1. Housing 2. Infrastructure 3. Safe biking paths and sidewalks 4. Making roadways safer 5. Speeding locals and Tourists and Distracted Drivers 6. The huge illegal drug problem Within Our City. Many of the above will harm or kill far more humans than any town deer will. I hope you will not make a knee-jerk reaction to a ""non-issue"" that we can never recover from . Just one cursory look at the history of the wolf in Idaho should tell you that (eradicate to extinction; re- introduce; and now eradicate to 90%+ extinction). This is a very dangerous situation of trying to ""Play God"". I hope our City officials take a BIG step back before it's far to late. Thank you Julie Conrad" 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance 25 6/11/21 11:24:56 Ernest Revello pob 518 McCall ID 83638 For Please prohibit the feeding of wildlife. It is essential for the safety and health of both people and animals. 26 6/13/21 19:29:30 Shelby Edwards sjedward@aol.com Against We love the "city" deer. They are part of the charm of McCall. Euthanizing or relocating the deer is detrimental to our community and we need to live with our wildlife and not eliminate them. 27 6/13/21 20:38:41 Darlene Kohout 917 Fairway Dr 14b Against As a member of this community for 70+ years. I am appalled that you are considering working with F&G to round up our deer with intent to move and KILL them!!! This is our community and does not belong to the TOURISTS. If they are bothered by them then maybe they shouldn't come here! Warning signs to slow down might be the answer. Our Fox populations has dwindled to nothing because of allowance by our state to kill for profit- Furs to other countries still buying pelts. Please consider who pays your salary and ELECTS you!! 28 6/16/21 16:25:06 Larry Hauder 1504 Louisa Ave, McCall, ID For I am in favor of the city taking action to regulate the "town deer herd". I see residents feeding them grain, apples, and hay. I see McCall guests stopping to throw fast food remains out the window for deer to eat, then taking a picture. I have had many many landscape plants and trees destroyed by the herd. I've seen visitors being chased when getting too close to the deer. In the spring, many deer look diseased and physically distressed as they pass through our yard. 29 6/16/21 15:20:05 Emily Hart 702 1st Street McCall, ID 83638 For "I support a city ordinance banning feeding of wildlife (except songbirds) in McCall city limits and impact zone. The deer problem is overwhelming at our house in the winter and spring. Up to 15 deer dwell on our property nearly every single day. The amount of feces is astounding, and the impact to the native shrubs and trees (mountain ash, lilac, currant, aspen, etc.) is significant. The deer continue to visit throughout the summer and fall, using five game trails to transit the property while browsing. I do not garden at home due to their presence, and instead grow vegetables in a plot at the Community Garden, which has a deer fence. I give the deer the widest berth possible when outside, but they have no fear of humans, and I don't trust them around kids. I am frustrated when I see people in my neighborhood leaving out food for them -I have seen quartered heads of iceberg lettuce, Cheerios cereal, and bales of hay. This is unconscionable human behavior. I fully support culling the mule deer population if a diagnosis of exotic lice makes transplanting them to the wild impossible. These deer are sickly (yet somehow hyper-fertile - so many twins and triplets), and it is inhumane to allow them to continue propagating in downtown McCall, which is not their native territory. They either belong in the wild, or they should be humanely dispatched. Thank you. Emily Hart 702 1st Street McCall, ID" ATTACHMENT 1 Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 1 of 60 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance 30 6/19/21 14:26:50 Benita Shaw Giltzow 199 Hazel Place, Donnelly , ID 83615 Against "I do not agree with the current proposal to trap, remove or euthanize the town deer of McCall. They are a part of the culture and fabric of our mountain town. Educate, not Eradicate"". " 31 6/22/21 13:50:56 Mark Dooley 258 Ernesto Against "Will the public be given a chance to review the draft ordinance prior to City Council taking action. Please call at 208-573-4627 or email draft to markdooley67@outlook.com, thanks " 32 6/22/21 16:56:09 Doris Eaton 212 N. 3rd Street, Suite D, McCall ID 83638 Against " ""I do not agree with and am fully against the current proposal to trap, remove or euthanize the town deer of McCall. They are a part of the culture and fabric of our mountain town. Educate, not Eradicate"". Post signs about deer in the city, don’t feed deer signs. There are other things that can be done! This is their home. " 33 6/22/21 21:51:26 Marsha L Bennett 221 Lake St #9 McCall Id 83638 For "I have lived on Lake St for 7 years. The deer are abundant. 3 deer have been killed in front of our residence in the last 5 months. They have eaten a lot of landscape materials down to the ground. A startled deer on more than one occasion has run through our property. If they had encountered a dog or a person this could have unfortunate consequences. We hear screeching brakes and see many near miss collisions. Lake St is very busy. I am concerned that sooner or later a serious accident will occur- a collision or a car veering to miss a deer and hitting a pedestrian or bicyclist. The abundant deer on Lake St are a serious hazard. I would rather see them removed then slaughtered on Lake St. I am very concerned for a serious accident on Lake St due to their presence causing a person’s injury or death. The danger and hazard on Lake St is much different than spotting them on the golf course. Allowing the town deer to stay and the population to grow will have severe consequences." 34 6/23/21 0:35:39 Sandra Borbonus 1746 N. Monterossa Way Eagle Idaho Against The charm of McCall is seeing and admiring nature and most importantly the wildlife! I am completely against forcing out, killing or relocating the deer ������� in McCall! They have more of a right to be there than we do. 35 6/23/21 0:35:03 Valerie Murray 23121 Freezeout Rd. Caldwell, Idaho 83607 Against "The mountains/forest is where deer should be allowed to roam. It is their natural habitat. The building of new buildings including homes and businesses is taking their habitat away. Deer should never be considered a nuisance, especially in McCall, Idaho. McCall is a mountain town. You are taking their habitat away without any consideration there are generations of deer in the area. Transferring them to another area is unfair to the deer and euthanizing them should not even be a consideration. Deer are basically a harmless creature. If residents do not want deer wandering through their yards then build higher fences, or move back to a city where deer seldom roam around. I for one would never take these creatures for granted. They are the innocent bystanders of people who are only complaining to be complaining. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 2 of 60 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance Please vote against this action. The deer do not deserve to be taken out of the only environment they know. Thank you, Valerie Murray" 36 6/23/21 0:34:02 Danielle Custer 411f Deinhard Lane McCall ID83638 Against "No I do not agree with the side proposal of transport, relocating and euthanizing deer by the Fish and Game.I would like the city to take pause and here from citizens, biologists etc. as well as consider other resort towns actions in this matter. I do agree with a city ordinance making it illegal to feed them in city limits." 37 6/23/21 3:46:43 Stephanie Schaff 430 Ringel St. Mccall, Id 83638 Against My husband and I have been full time residents in McCall since 2016. The reason that we love to live here is our proximity to nature and wildlife. These deer are part of what makes McCall so special and it would be a travesty to lose them. 38 6/23/21 6:40:53 Kristie Williams 1102 N. 7th St. Parma, ID. 83660 Against "I am not a resident of McCall, however, my family are regular visitors. One of the things we love about your town is the opportunity to see the wildlife that has made their home there for so many years. I understand and agree that at times, all animals can be a “nuisance”, but so can a lot of people. Just like in many other areas across our beautiful state, with the exceptional growth we have experienced, we are slowly taking over all of the land that belonged to our wildlife. I am against your plan to relocate, trap, euthanize these animals just because they may be a bother to some people. This was their home first and it is our responsibility to learn to live with them and coexist. With that being said, I am not a resident of your beautiful town and I don’t live with the challenges on a daily basis. But, I would ask that you consider my comments as well as the many others you are likely receiving. Thank you for your time. " 39 6/23/21 7:36:47 Karen Scott 277 S Cobblestone Way, Eagle, ID 83616 Against We have been visiting McCall frequently since 2001. Prior to that it had only been once or twice. The first 15 years we would stay at Worldmark. We absolutely loved when the wildlife would grace us with a glimpse. The deer were always big hit! The last few years, when we visit, we stay with friends or family, or at their homes when they are away. Even the thought of "removing ALL deer" from the city is disgusting! These animals have lived there for much longer than we humans! How in the world, as a human, can you even grasp the concept of wiping out hundred of living creatures? Sure, there will be a problem animal or two, from time to time...but for Heavens sake, these are LIVING ANIMALS! Who are you/we, to decide they shouldn't be here anymore? All of this because of what? And, is this the publicity you want for your beautiful mountain town...."they killed all of the deer in the town limits because some people thought they were a nuisance?" Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 3 of 60 6/23/21 Comments related to Wildlife Ordinance 40 6/23/21 7:20:57 Nancy Krahn 906 Ann Street, McCall Against I do not agree with trapping, moving or euthanizing the town herd of deer. People moved into their home not the reverse. I agree that people should be educated about the reasons NOT to feed any of the wildlife in our town but I don’t think that a City Ordinance is the answer. As with so many other rules in McCall there is no one enforcing them so they are meaningless. Please leave the town deer where they are and do a “Don’t Feed the Wildlife” campaign to educate our locals and visitors about how to properly interact with our wild neighbors. 41 6/23/21 7:58:48 Veronique Borbonus 10060 W Roan Meadows dr Boise, ID 83709 Against "The idea that some people believe the deer are a nuisance in McCall is disheartening. When you move to a mountain town/area, you learn to coincide with the animals who have been there before man. The deer are intriguing to watch when we come across them in town on our visits. They come because they feel safe, don’t take that away from them. " Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 4 of 60 Page 1 of 46 A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 11:11 AM First Name: Jenna Last Name: Medina Email Address: j.lantz1997@gmail.com Describe Your Concern: Keep the town deer. A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/23/2021 11:18 PM First Name: Wes Last Name: Atkinson Email Address: wesatkinson.wa@gmail.com Describe Your Concern: I highly oppose the deer eradication in McCall and I believe the feeding of the deer should be a fine. However completely removing the deer is a shame on the city and IDFG. This will be removing a part of McCall that makes it special. I want me kids to enjoy seeing the deer around town. Educate the public on feeding the deer and issue fines for those who do not comply. A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 7:39 AM First Name: Alexa Last Name: Martinez Email Address: alexarbm@gmail.com Address: 7583 w corona dr City: Boise State/Province: ID Zip Code: 83709 Describe Your Concern: Against removal of the deer from McCall. A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 6:19 AM First Name: Sandee Last Name: Vanderpool Email Address: sjvanderpool@msn.com Address: 16068 Mountain View Road City: Mount Vernon State/Province: WA Zip Code: 98274 Describe Your Concern: Save the deer. We visit McCall 2-3 times a year. A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/23/2021 4:11 PM First Name: Cathleen Last Name: Curtiss Email Address: cjcurtiss57@gmail.com Address: 1575 Dragonfly Loop City: McCall Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 5 of 60 Page 2 of 46 State/Province: ID Zip Code: 83638 Describe Your Concern: I am really opposed to trapping, relocating and euthanasia of the local deer. A new submission has been received for Report a Compliment or Service Concern at 06/24/2021 1:46 PM First Name: Mike Last Name: Jorgensen Email Address: m.jorgensen0323@gmail.com Address: 1426 nw 2nd str City: Meridian State/Province: ID Zip Code: 83642 Describe Your Concern: I am against the removal of Deer from the town of McCall or anywhere for that matter!! It’s a mountain town for God sakes 11 6/23/21 16:52:59 Susan Rader 2745 13th St. Clarkston, WA 99403 I would like to submit my objection to removing the town deer. It's a ridiculous and cruel thing you are proposing. I used to live in McCall, the deer are part of the charm. Please be mindfully of the eco system in this beautiful area. Thank you, Susan J. Rader 12 6/23/21 17:01:52 Brenda Jansson 8958 W Candleston ct Boise ID 83709 (lived in McCall for 15 years) Don't you DARE KILL or remove our wildlife!!!!! We love them like we love our pets and our family. They are part of our neighborhoods. How would YOU like it someone threw you out of YOUR home because some asshole (who probably just moved here from another state) wanted you gone??? 14 6/23/21 18:17:50 Ed Orbea 17109 N Wylie Place, Nampa ID The Proposed Wildlife Code Amendment is pure/unadulterated BULL SHIT. Train the people to properly/correctly deal with the deer (including providing food) not the other way around! 15 6/23/21 18:33:23 Debra Matheson 1104 n b st Parma idaho 83660 If you want to live in the forest your in "their" home. 17 6/23/21 20:37:35 Michelle Koenig mnkoenig@gmail.com I am not in favor of relocating the deer. People need to not be feeding them. I have witnessed times where 15+ deer hanging out at the mobile homes behind the Shell station. They are wandering around looking for food. The people there are feeding them. We saw them come outside and put food out. That has to stop. The deer don’t need to be relocated. 18 6/23/21 21:49:46 Julie Thorstad 3430 Estes st. Baker City, Oregon 97814 To remove Town Deer is a travesty for the town members. The deer are a part of this area as much as the mountain streams or trees surrounding McCall. Generations of families come to McCall to experience the wilderness, not just participate in the shopping or skiing activities. Town deer are a part of my home town Baker City and to remove them is like taking away the pine or sage smell after a good rain. It is wrong to remove the deer as this is their home! 23 6/23/21 22:24:57 Catherine Stein 1626 E Lake St, McCall ID This concept of relocating and stopping feeding of our local deer is cruel and something as a City Council Group I would Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 6 of 60 Page 3 of 46 NOT WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH. I have been a property owner since 1976 and have felt the wildlife around town and it’s various neighborhoods totally charming and an important tool of education to our youth. Please table this insane concept and get busy filling the potholes or designating a new stop light location to save lives!!!! 24 6/23/21 23:47:29 Sandra wilkinson 269 Morgan Drive, McCall I am beyond saddened to learn of this Draconian proposal. With all the beauty that McCall has to offer, NOTHING can compare to the joy that we and our family and our five granddaughters have experienced in sharing this beautiful place with the many varieties of wildlife that pass through our yard on a daily basis. It is and always has been the main attraction for us. They were here before we were. We are encroaching on their space! Plans to remove this magnificent wildlife will turn McCall into another run of the mill tiny town with no special character or charm, instead of the lovely respite that it is. Please, please do not do this. 26 6/24/21 5:56:57 Randi Allred 5399 N RED HILLS AVE 83646 My family has been going to McCall for 36 years to visit, work and play. We see these deer every time and would be disgusted that they are removed! We the people are the problem! There has to be a better way and that is to let them be! Relocating will mean more euthanized. For once listen to the people of Idaho. Their are far more invasive problems to address within education in McCall and creating jobs for sustainable city. Choose carefully. 27 6/24/21 7:39:11 Allison Hatzenbuhler 13127 Hawks Bay Raod "We have built a community in woodlands. The animals were here and we infringed into their space and now we want them to leave. They are NOT a nuisance, we need to learn to live amongst them! If you don’t like them eating your flowers, plant something else. Are they in danger when crossing the street? Yes… perhaps we need to reduce the speed limits. We, AS PEOPLE, need to alter OUR behavior to fit in with their lives. We covered their feeding grounds by building more and more houses so what do we expect? They still forage for what they need. I can’t believe that the City of McCall would take the time and expense to do this. Spend that money on, and distribute, deer food with lice medicine in it and solve that part of the problem. Personally, I think speeding is much more of a nuisance and danger to people than all of the deer. Put those funds to hire 3 additional officers to set up and catch speeders!" 28 6/24/21 7:46:45 Rick Hatzenbuhler 13127 Hawks Bay Road Have you ever seen the joy on visiting children’s faces when they see some of our “city herd” walking down the street? Have you heard tourists all suddenly quiet down, point and start taking pictures from the top of SRB or Sushi Place as 4 or 5 deer amble down the street? Have YOU Council members ever slowed down long enough to stop to “smell the roses” and appreciate what these animals do for the ambiance of McCall? We built homes in the middle of Bambi’s forest and now we want to kill Bambi. Pretty soon you will all think the Moose on a moose a island are a danger to us…. Too many fish in the lake are scary to swimmers, let’s kill them all. Look what we have done! Please rethink this. 29 6/24/21 8:19:13 Lori Scott 125 Jughandle Drive McCall ID 83638 Deer are not a nuisance. They are part of our community and should be left alone. People need to be educated and if they don’t appreciate our natural wildlife they should stay away. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 7 of 60 Page 4 of 46 30 6/24/21 8:32:31 Michele Strang 45 Silver Fox Trail, McCall, ID 83638 The deer have been here long before we humans. McCall isn’t McCall without the local deer. Who are these people who are complaining? Please educate and fine people for feeding the deer. PLEASE do not remove or euthanize the deer. That’s heartless, that’s just idiotic! Don’t like the local residents (deer), move! 32 6/24/21 8:53:25 Garianne Mabe 806 E. Maine Ave, Nampa, ID 83686 I love visiting McCall! I often refer to McCall as my "happy place" largely due to the deer we see around town and at our timeshare. I love going to the mountains and experiencing the wildlife! If some of the residents of McCall don't like wildlife in their backyards, perhaps they should move elsewhere. After all, McCall is located in the mountains and the deer and other wildlife were there first! McCall and Idaho wildlife officials should be working for the wildlife, not the people that have encroached on wildlife habitats. I am an Idaho native and love the charm of McCall and the occasional wildlife sightings. I have a sneaking suspicion that those raising concerns about the "town deer" are out-of-staters that have relocated to McCall. Please stop letting them dictate what happens in our little slice of heaven. Another thing for the city council to consider is McCall's economy. I know many people (including myself) will be less likely to visit and spend money in McCall if the deer are relocated or euthanized. I encourage officials to leave the deer and other wildlife alone if they wish to retain the special charm of McCall. 35 6/24/21 10:16:45 Brenda Jansson 8958 W candleston ct boise id Sorry the deer are such a nuisance to you but WE like them here. And just in case you didn't know, WE are encroaching on THEIR land, NOT the other way around. I'm sure the Native Americans felt the same way when they were targeted for being a 'Nuisance'. 37 6/24/21 12:27:37 Patti Rahn 10493 Maymie Road Boise ID 83714 "Oh my goodness!!! Surely, the city and F&G have more important issues to deal with than this!! I hope that enough people show support for this movement and that all that visit McCall will be able to continue enjoying the animals that were their first!! After all, in the big scheme of things, we are actually guests on their land!! " 40 6/24/21 13:46:31 Kim Hannah 981 Old Lebanon Dirt Rd., Hermitage, TN 37076 I am strongly against this. The world is watching. Do the right thing and leave the deer alone. 41 6/24/21 14:06:46 Sally Elliott 1940 Warren Wagon Rd, McCall, Id 83638 "It is unbelievable that the McCall City Council and the Idaho Fish and Game are even discussing controlling the deer or any local wildlife that they have determined to be causing problems in our Community. My husband and I have lived in McCall for 45 years because of the abondance of wildlife and the quality of the environment. The primary threat facing McCall is not from animals, but from the exponentiel increase of people in speeding cars, trucks and ATV's on our roadways. The human activity in McCall and Valley is simply not sustainable. We adamantly oppose the removal or killing of wildlife. Do not blame the wildlife." 43 6/24/21 14:50:52 Joey Pietri 225 Valley Springd Rd. McCall, Ldaho 83638 I vehemently oppose any forced relocaion or euthanization of Deer or any wildlife of McCall . Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 8 of 60 Page 5 of 46 42 6/23/21 8:15:51 Sallie Oberlin POBox 1722, McCall ID Against I find it difficult to believe the City Council would vote to remove one of McCall’s favorite visitor attractions, to say nothing about the smiles seeing our deer elicit from those of us who make McCall our home. Perhaps attention needs to be directed to visitors who see a crosswalk and stroll across without making sure there are no cars. Why not fine those who are seen feeding the deer (and other wildlife), post visible signs addressing fact that feeding wildlife interferes with the natural migration plan and monitor the results before you cause undue friction. 43 6/23/21 9:55:02 Sandie Schaumburg 5614 Lakewood Ave Caldwell, ID 83607 Against "The deer and wildlife is one of the main reasons why I myself, my family and other people go to McCall. We always stop and take pictures of the deer in town. We always camp at Ponderosa and love watching them come through the campsites. We watch for them every morning and every evening. The mommas with their babies are the best. That was their home way before it was anyone was around. Why in the world would we take them from their home and why in the world would anyone ever want to euthanize them???? Seriously??? IF people can't handle the wildlife in the mountains then they don't need to live there or even go up there. Please leave the wildlife alone.. They call the place home." 44 6/23/21 10:10:06 Colleen Ross PO Box 510, McCall, ID Against "I am heartbroken that this proposed ordinance has gotten this far. Apparently, “the powers that be” have already made a decision, but I think it is a bad one and am completely against it. A major reason many of us love living in McCall is our close relationship to nature. Our beautiful lake, Ponderosa Park, the surrounding mountains, and, yes, wildlife, especially the town deer and foxes. Yes, they occasionally complicate things, but if they could speak I am sure they would say we have done the same for them. We live on a very busy street with a blind curve that is posted 20 mph, but the average speed driven is much higher. Many drive more than 30 mph. No thought is given the safety of any person or animal on or adjacent to the street. Last night our peaceful evening was interrupted by a young man driving an SUV who was “forced” to come to a stop because a young fawn and mother deer were crossing the roadway. The young driver yelled out his window, “F*%k you!” I thought there was an altercation going on, but were no other people or cars out there. He was yelling an expletive at the deer. I do not understand that mentality, but we see the aggressive driving, the honking and intentional driving “at speed” to scare the deer and to me it says volumes about our sense of entitlement and our species’ lack of empathy for other life. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 9 of 60 Page 6 of 46 So, instead of getting mad at the deer, foxes and other wildlife in town, let’s try to figure out how to live with them: spend money on better traffic signs, give tickets to our perennial speeders, better educate visitors and residents about how to coexist with wildlife, and generally be grateful for the fact we do have wildlife all around us? That is part of the “magic of McCall,” after all? We cared enough about wildlife and the “wonder of nature” to enact anti-light pollution ordinance; why can’t we learn to live with nature instead of killing or “removing” it from town? We might as well all move back to the suburbs at that point? Since some apparently want to “fast track” this ordinance, the final thing that breaks my heart is that this city council is not giving this issue the public hearing it deserves. This ordinance is not about helping the deer, but about appeasing a small group of people who seem to have a point of view that I do not think makes sense financially, scientifically, or morally. Nor is it workable at a practical level - after the deer are ""removed"", do you think other deer are not going to move back in to town to replace the removed deer? Passing this ordinance without a thorough public hearing with “live” testimony would leave wounds in the community. To me that would be the most heartbreaking thing of all. " 45 6/23/21 10:25:18 Sarah Williams 200 Jacob st. McCall Idaho Against I am against this proposal. This is the saddest thing I’ve heard. Deer are a gem to this community and what makes McCall precious to so many. 46 6/23/21 10:33:19 Ian Williams 317 Mountain Cove Court Against I am completely against this ordinance. We love the deer in our area and it would be a major mistake if the city moved to relocate them. They add to the beauty of McCall. Do not pass this. 47 6/23/21 10:28:01 Lew Ross PO Box 510, McCall, ID Against I agree with the recent editorial in the Star News: this issue deserves a public hearing with live testimony from both sides. Otherwise, this issue will become a permanent controversy, one that divides us rather than unites us. Personally, I enjoy seeing wildlife in town and think the degree of the "problem" is overstated. Like the resident geese in public parks nationwide, my guess is that our town deer are a permanent feature of life in the mountains. Let's be happy we live here and have them. 48 6/23/21 11:09:29 Kristiina Spencer 8016 W Whittaker st Boise Idaho 83714 Against I think this is ridiculous… what other resort town in the US does this?? If you don’t want wildlife on your property then don’t buy in the middle of a Forrest go purchase your property in the concrete jungle of the city… 49 6/23/21 11:38:03 Jeff Martel Jeff@43re.com Against "Jeff Martel, 1020 Cedar Lane, McCall. I am for selective removal of sick or problematic wildlife, but I am against the full removal/euthanize of the “in-town” wildlife without further study. I think taking time and not rushing to a decision is always prudent. " 50 6/23/21 11:38:45 Sherri Pedersen 431 McGinnis St McCall Against I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer in McCall. The will not survive a Winter out there! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 10 of 60 Page 7 of 46 I do not feel the deer are a “nuisance”, only those that are in a hurry and traveling too fast (not 25 mph) and in their way. Also, those dog that are too close to a mama deer and her babies she is only protecting her babies, that is human and animal instinct. 51 6/23/21 13:38:21 Marta Paulson 624 Ruby Street Against I find it absurd to move wildlife from their habitat simply because we have built homes there. We are respectful of the animals near and around our home. They are not a nuisance, but rather a gift of Nature. Leave the animals in Peace. 52 6/23/21 13:57:49 Sarah Curtright 4365 W Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 Against We visit the mountains to see wildlife 53 6/23/21 13:58:49 Tim Curtright 12856 Axel Donnelly, ID 83615 Against We live in the mountains to see/enjoy wildlife 54 6/23/21 13:59:23 Judy Curtright 12856 Axel Rd Donnelly, ID 83615 Against We live in the mountains to see/enjoy wildlife 55 6/23/21 13:57:59 Gail Rankin 675 Fox Ridge Lane For Deer are increasingly problematic in McCall, both on the roads and in our yards. As a physician, I am also very concerned that deer are a vector for ticks and will increase how rapidly we are exposed to Lyme disease and other dangerous infections. Thank you. 56 6/23/21 13:59:48 Cherie Wick 12856 Axel Donnelly Against I love to see the animals when I travel around 57 6/23/21 14:00:21 Connor Wick 12856 Axel Donnelly Against Manage people not animals 58 6/23/21 14:00:11 Bruce Rankin 675 Fox Ridge Lane For There are too many deer in the city doing too much damage. 59 6/23/21 14:00:43 Ashton Wick 12856 Axel Against Deer make me happy 60 6/23/21 14:05:17 Wendy Albright 1075 Shady Lane Loop, McCall, ID Against "My partner built his home in 1989 and since then we have enjoyed the deer and other wildlife in McCall. We have embraced their presence as part of having a home in a rural town. I am very much against removing them and am aghast that this matter has even been brought to the council for any type of consideration. -Wendy Albright" 61 6/23/21 14:09:20 Jessie Farnsworth 1575 West Ryegrass Court Against I am against the relocation or euthanasia of any wildlife in McCall. I visit McCall frequently and love seeing all the wildlife that is present. I am a avid hunter and believe relocation would be to stressful on the animal causing death as well as euthanasia is cruel to do on any animal that is in good health. People moves into the home area of these deer and therefore the deer shouldn't be punished for something that those people decided. The people that live mccall knew what they were moving into before they purchased their home and or businesses. The deer presence is what brings some of the business to mccall as well. So not only is it going to cost money to get rid of the deer in general but you also be loosing money from the tourist who come up just to see the deer. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 11 of 60 Page 8 of 46 62 6/23/21 14:09:11 Sue Schaffner 12961 Ponderosa Dr Donnelly Id Against As a native Idahoan and Donnelly property owner, I vehemently oppose this horrendous idea regarding our native wildlife! The mountains of Idaho belong to all Gods creatures and they certainty are NOT a nuisance. 63 6/23/21 14:16:36 Kim Brandt 10982 W Tioga St, Boise, ID 83709 Against I am adamantly opposed to the trapping, relocating or euthanization of the deer population, and any other native wildlife in the McCall area. 64 6/23/21 11:16:07 James and Debra Staup P.O. Box 1221 McCall, ID Against We, James and Debra Staup, are against any measure that would result in the ultimate removal, relocation, and eradication of our town deer. There are better and more humane ways to live with and manage our deer and other wildlife. The City Council may think what F&G does with our deer has no reflection on them, but it greatly does. The Council can definitely influence a better outcome. A no feeding ordinance is fine as long as it is backed by common sense .. meaning a humane wildlife management plan in place that supports and preserves our town deer here in their habitat. I sent an email to each of you two weeks ago with some realistic solutions other states and communities do. These solutions were from F&G Wildlife Experts. McCall Needs to be Proactive not Reactive. Let's stop this wrongful path and work to create a safe, reasonable, and humane path of preservation for our wildlife. .. James and Debra Staup 65 6/23/21 14:26:36 Brad Bartlett 1610 S Loggers Pond Place Apt. 16 Boise Idaho 83706 Against I am very much against this proposal. My in-laws have owned property off of Samson Trail for over 45 years and the deer have been a great source of enjoyment during that time. My kids grew up watching the deer and other wildlife roam freely around the property. Please reconsider this proposal as I believe it is a bad one. Thank you. 66 6/23/21 14:33:50 Kim French kkfrench69@gmail.com Against Humans are the nuisance to wildlife, not the other way around. McCall is surrounded by forests and lakes. What kind of person wouldn’t expect there to be deer or any other wildlife. I agree the public needs educating on reasons why they should not be feeding the wildlife but relocation and euthanasia are a despicable solution. 67 6/23/21 14:42:07 James French jfrenchjr1969@gmail.com Against Humans are the nuisance to wildlife, not the other way around. McCall is surrounded by forests and lakes. What kind of person wouldn’t expect there to be deer. Educate the public on why they should not feed wildlife. Relocation and euthanasia are both a despicable option. 68 6/23/21 14:51:42 Jeanine Halbesleben 10960 W. Shetland Rd. - Boise, ID 83709 Against I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. They are part of the reason why my family loves McCall so much. 69 6/23/21 14:20:33 Patty Hickman 1603 Davis Ave Against "My husband and my self have lived on this street for 40 years, in that time we have watched the deer migrate on the same route year after year. Once the deer quit leaving in the winter we watched them use the same paths to move around town. I don’t claim to know why this started but I do for a fact know that their staying had nothing to do with people feeding them. So now fast forward years later and we have an abundance of Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 12 of 60 Page 9 of 46 deer in town. Yes deer are getting hit by cars but is that really the deer’s fault? No it is not! If the people driving our city’s roads would drive the speed limit of 25 mph as posted throughout town and pay attention instead of texting or what ever they are doing, they could easily come to a stop and not hit the deer. I have taken the time to do some research on stopping distances at various speeds. 25mph: up to 85 ft to stop, 30mph: 109 ft, 35 mph: 136 ft and 60 mph: 305 feet. So my point is that if the speed limits were enforced in this town the odds of deer getting hit go exponentially down. So that solves problem #1. Mangy looking deer, this is what happens to deer in the winter no matter where they are, it happens to some dogs too! It isn’t because they are sick or infected with some deer disease or from people feeding them, it is their natural hair process. I am not saying there aren’t a few sick ones out there but for the most part our town deer are pretty healthy. It isn’t the fault of the people that are feeding the deer that they are getting hit as relayed to my husband by an uninformed police officer. I can show you pictures from 20-25 years ago that show the deer using the same migratory path and they still are in spite of all the building across the street. I am against eradication of all the deer in this town and in favor of educating people and enforcing the speed limits!!!! I will go so far as to offer any officer to sit I’m my driveway anytime and stop the constant stream of speeding cars on Davis Ave. I would venture a guess that you could pay for an officer hired for this purpose within a very short period of time. Let’s try to work together and it will be a win win for all involved, especially the deer �������! Sincerely Patty Hickman Mccall" 70 6/23/21 15:10:55 Shermayne Young 9931 Hwy 45 Middleton, Id 83644 Neutral I agree to prohibit feeding the wildlife in question, but do NOT agree to removing the animals from the town. 71 6/23/21 14:38:45 Pamela Willett 7350 Gary Lane Boise, Idaho 83714 Against McCall is NOT McCall without the deer! This has NEVER been an issue until our beautiful state has been inundated with transplants! The deer and the other abundant wildlife, are part of what makes McCall such a desirable place to live and visit! If you CHOOSE to live in nature, or recreate, then wildlife will be a part of that environment! This is an OUTRAGEOUS proposal!!! I support respecting wildlife and not feeding them, however, eradicating them from their home is a huge mistake! These are God's creatures, not a "nuisance" as a FEW are stating. The sweet deer are NOT the problem, too many people are!! I am very angry that this is even being considered! I have proudly lived in this gorgeous state for over 45 years and McCall is a place I cherish.....don't destroy the magic by removing one of the very things that makes it this way! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 13 of 60 Page 10 of 46 72 6/23/21 15:53:25 Brian Recher 14005 hogue hollow road. Mccall ID 83638 Against I am 100 percent against this proposal. The local wildlife is a benefit to our community and not a nuisance. We are a nuisance to them 73 6/23/21 16:14:05 Sondra McMindes 3308 Shaggy Mane Against It is fine to ban feeding of the deer. But, PLEASE don't kill or relocate them. The wildlife help make McCall the beautiful town that it is. 74 6/23/21 16:18:38 Zoran Trejos-French 1425 liberty at unit 5 Boise ID 83704 Against Euthanizing and relocating animals that have been native to the area before humans were in unethical and wrong. Idaho is beautiful state, doing this is destroying our home. Teach humans not to feed wildlife, not that it’s okay to kill wildlife when they get in our way. 75 6/23/21 16:35:24 Deborah Smit 507 Hemlock st, unit 72, McCall Against The deer should be left alone. We have taken over their habitat in a very large number of locations. Why should they be the ones to suffer for our greed? Also, McCall prides itself on being a paradise for outdoorsmen and being able to see nature up close is becoming more and more rare. 76 6/23/21 16:31:35 Linda Tunis box 606 McCall Against I am 100 % against the trapping and killing of our town herd. Snowden as well as many wild life services know trapping and relocation in almost a death sentence in itself. the backlash in public opinion, general response to this drastic action I think is very underestimated and will bring much sorrow , and great amounts of anger,hostility and cause more trouble than the deer. 77 6/23/21 16:16:55 Donna Hoffman 850 Shelia Ln,McCall,Id 83638 Against "Please do not remove or euthanize our town deer. It’s a horrific idea. We are living in their habitat. They were here first this is their territory. Humans have decided to live here among the wild animals. So if you don’t like them, then you go live somewhere else. " 78 6/23/21 16:42:35 Jackie Mitchell 300 Mather Rd, McCall ID 83638 For I agree with making the feeding of wildlife illegal, and the removal of town deer if needed. I trust my local fish and game officials and the judgement and decisions they will make. 79 6/23/21 16:49:49 John Riggins 662 Koski Dr., McCall, ID 83638 (PO Box 1925) For I support banning the feeding of game animals, such as deer and elk (those wildlife species managed as game animals by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game), within the curtrent and future city limits of the City of McCall. Said feeding ban not to include songbirds and hummingbirds, or non- game wildlife species, such as squirrels. 80 6/23/21 16:55:32 Melanie Curry 670 Koski McCall, Id 83638 Against I am strongly opposed to this. 81 6/23/21 16:54:53 Marjolein Lolkema 3 Squirrel Ln, Garden Valley, 83622, ID Against I am against the trapping, relocating, and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. This is proposing to just kill all wildlife. First Idaho started with the wolves, now these town deer. Next? McCall Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 14 of 60 Page 11 of 46 better should invest in eco-tourism, instead of killing or locate them in another part of the state (which basically means, killing them too). This is an idiot proposal. Like: complaining about trees because in the fall they lose their leaves and that is sooo inconvenient (and this is also a true story). 82 6/23/21 16:58:41 Brenda Jansson 8958 W Candleston ct Boise ID 83709 ( I lived in McCall for 15 years) Against Don't you DARE KILL or remove our wildlife!!!!! We love them like we love our pets and our family. They are part of our neighborhoods. How would YOU like it someone threw you out of YOUR home because some asshole (who probably just moved here from another state) wanted you gone??? 83 6/23/21 17:12:46 Susan Cottrell 2517 E Ohio Ave Nampa Idaho 83686 Against Wild life is one of the big attractions for enjoying McCall please don't take this away from us. 84 6/23/21 17:21:08 Jennifer Garland 1656 Davis Ave. Against I absolutely oppose the proposal to remove and eliminate the deer or squirrels. We have reunited their natural habit and are increasingly destroying more habit through our greed and narcissistic habits and behaviors. Add climate changes and more and more wildlife will attempt to live in our areas where there is accessible water and food. Most of us that have been visiting or living in the area came here to be able to see, smell, feel and taste the most amazing environment. We are the nuisance, not the wildlife. Educate people on consequences of feeding the deer, create deer friendly zones on endowment lands rather than planting mansions for the rich, and find ways to open paths for the wildlife to traverse the area safely. Y’all can do better, be better. 85 6/23/21 17:26:51 Rod Groff 6316 castle Dr, Boise Idaho Against The beauty of McCall is the coexistence of the wildlife. 86 6/23/21 17:27:07 Eddie and Danielle Gray 705 Reedy lane Against We are wholeheartedly against transporting or euthanizing our town deer. The deer are not a “nuisance” the deer have been here far longer than we have. Please educate don’t eradicate, McCall native lived here 58 years, deer have been in town for generations it is what makes McCall a beautiful quaint town full of wildlife . Eddie and Danielle Gray 87 6/23/21 17:34:45 Jennifer Leavitt 6596 S Jessenia Ave, Boise ID Against I am against the trapping and relocation of wild animals in the City of McCall, ID. The idea is absolutely asinine and ridiculous. Humans have invaded our native wildlife's habitat and need to adapt to their behavior, not the other way around. 88 6/23/21 17:38:39 Patricia Braganza 1201 Roosevelt Avenue, McCall, ID Against To trap and remove the "town herd" is cruel and inhumane. These deer know only this environment and climate. Most will not survive being moved to a totally different environment, plus have to compete against the deer already there. 89 6/23/21 17:42:12 Harlie Burgess P. O. Box 4416 McCall Idaho 83638 Against Against this happening! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 15 of 60 Page 12 of 46 90 6/23/21 17:46:24 Kris Cox 319 W Hunley, Ave Westport, WA 98520 Against As a regular visitor to McCall since 2000, I am against the killing of any wildlife as that is a big reason why I continue to visit the area. If this were to pass I would be taking my travel money and spending it elsewhere for sure. 91 6/23/21 17:45:22 Teia McCormick 7700 S Carpenter Ave. Boise, Idaho 83709 Against If this passes, things will never be the same. Part of the appeal of McCall is the possibility of seeing wildlife. Removing all the deer and possibly uthanizing them is just wrong and heartless. And we as humans are better than that. This can't be allowed! 92 6/23/21 17:52:31 Kara-Jo A. Cone 331 Mather Road Against I disagree with the trapping and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. I disagree with them being a nuisance and love seeing them daily. 93 6/23/21 17:52:34 Margo Flaherty PO Box 515 Donnelly ID 83615 Against I am against trapping removing euthanasia of town wildlife 94 6/23/21 17:54:57 Amber Levanger 236 Rio Vista Blvd Against We love that mccall has local deer. It’s apart of McCall’s charm. We are against this completely. And we live here full time. 95 6/23/21 17:52:01 Chris Chris@draftcard.com Against I have lived in Idaho for 25 years and have purchased my hunting and fishing license and tags every year. To hear the council wanting to get rid of all deer in Town makes no sense. If you lived in New York City maybe but we’re here in Idaho which it seems like with everyone moving here from big cities to escape the concrete jungles it’s a shame that we can’t make room for animals. We keep building more homes eliminating habitat and natural feeding grounds. Funny how watching these out of touch councils and school boards can’t find something better to do then try to turn our great state into the next Portland! 96 6/23/21 17:56:22 Sara Brooks 2730 N Dalton ln Against I do NOT support relocating of wildlife or the euthanization of McCalls deer. They deer were here before us and this is their home as much as ours. We’ve been living with them for as long as the town has been here and they are a part of it. 97 6/23/21 17:56:20 Mary Fain PO Box 1955 McCall Against I do not agree with killing off the deer because they are a nuisance. I love driving in town seeing the deer. Living in the mountains includes wildlife. If you feel something needs to be done please relocate them. I do agree people feeding them is not helping the situation. Please to not make a quick decision just to get rid of them. 98 6/23/21 17:59:45 Rosie Saenz 5733 Abby Dr, Corpus Christi TX 78413 Against Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 16 of 60 Page 13 of 46 This is unfathomable! As a visitor to your beautiful town, I took many pictures of the local deer and think of this as a friendly town to animals. They are wonderful creatures that add to the serenity of your town. To murder them???? What are you thinking??? Shameful. 99 6/23/21 18:05:27 No 12966 Zoon ln, McCall Idaho 83638 Against Vote: No 100 6/23/21 18:07:58 Omega Taylor 1896 W Lake Pointe Ct, Nampa, ID 83651 Against I am against the removal of the deer population in McCall. This is inhumane and will take away from the natural beauty that brings so much character to the area. Would we continue to do this in the future as other wildlife population move into the area? 102 6/23/21 18:15:42 Sandy Williamson McCall, Idaho Against I’m against removing our beautiful town deer. They are truly magnificent to see and watch. They were here first. Leave the deer alone 103 6/23/21 18:16:11 Barbara Minton 1630 Davis Ave #23 Against Although it makes sense to encourage people not to feed wildlife, this should be an educational process not a legal one. Second, I am against moving or euthanizing the town herd of deer. 104 6/23/21 18:17:44 Kristy Payme 600 S Winterberry Ct Nampa, ID 83687 Against We LOVE the wildlife in McCall. It’s one of the things that make it a special place. 105 6/23/21 18:02:35 Sarah Reyes 909 E Jefferson St Boise, ID 83712 Against Our family LOVES the deer and other wildlife in McCall!!! 106 6/23/21 18:20:06 Barbara Harper 156 Pile St, P.O.Box 69, Ramona,Ca 92065 Against My family loves coming to MC Call each year to visit. We always enjoy watching the deer roam around the town. What a sad day when an animal is called a nuisance for just being in it’s own environment. Who really is the nuisance here? 107 6/23/21 18:22:47 Donna Robinson 507 Bluewater Hwy , Surfside Tx 77541 Against My Grandparents owned a cabin in McCall many years ago. We would vacation there in the summer. We loved the natural beauty and enjoyed watching the deer. Please do not kill the deer . They have every right to be there. Thank you for your time . 108 6/23/21 18:17:07 Marvin Lockwood 117 Gavin’s Place, Yankton, South Dakota. 57078 Against I live on the edge of Yankton, South Dakota. We have deer that I feed regularly so I can enjoy the wildlife up close. Fun to see how they evolve through the seasons... Viewing fawns with mom or watching the young bucks grow antlers and eventually grow to majestic bucks. I believe it has been good for my mental health to be closer to all wildlife!! 109 6/23/21 18:25:55 Tami Beus 1412 mill rd Emmett I’d 83617 Against It was their home long before all these people calling them a nuisance were there I think that’s just wrong and cruel let them live there to have their babies and go back where they go Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 17 of 60 Page 14 of 46 110 6/23/21 18:24:27 Brandy Jones 1241 Herrick St McCall Idaho 83638 Against With all due respect, I am pleading with you to NOT take our town deer. These town deer are what made me want to live, work and raise my children here in McCall. These beauties are fascinating and intriguing to watch. I love watching these deer in my yard as well as through my work windows. My children tell family and friends about the deer they live with. This would be so heartbreaking for many McCall residence as well as our town visitors. 111 6/23/21 18:31:23 No feed ordinance 1104 n b st Parma idaho 83660 Against If you want to live in the forest you need to realize you live in "there" home 112 6/23/21 18:27:07 Amanda Brunmeier 11599 cabin creek st Against "I understand the nuisances humans cause by feeding wildlife. I also understand the reality of population growth. Removing the wildlife from McCall or Valley county for that matter would take away from the natural environment of the area!! Spend your fish and game allocated funds more resourcefully. Educate your visitors post signs, fine those should they be caught feeding animals or leaving food accessible while camping in a state-city- county park, visited by wildlife, but don't punish the animals and others who know how to behave as decent humans for the few new comers who don't. I oppose the matter at hand and ask you do not enforce this matter." 113 6/23/21 18:02:47 John Henry Mitchell III 300 Mather Rd McCall, ID 83638 For "#thintheherd! It doesn't take a wildlife biologist to tell you mule deer migrate! They should not be in mccall during the months of dec thru may. Stop selfishly feeding the deer which prevents them from migrating (for your own instant gratification) and Let idfg manage the wildlife so we can Get them the hell out of town, duh!!! Long valley is not winter habitat for mule deer or elk for that matter and if you cant handle that simple fact, move. Stop feeding deer potato chips in the shore lodge parking lot and Go watch them in their natural habitat, anywhere idfg is going to move them, outside of town. " 114 6/23/21 18:27:01 Kori Merlino 494 Cammy Drive Against I do not support this proposal to diminish the population of deer in McCall. The beauty of our wildlife, here in McCall, is one of the reasons we live here as full-time residents. It breaks my heart to think that there is a possibility of ridding this majestic area of such beautiful wildlife. I support the increased education on the effects of domesticating these beautiful animals, make fines steep for feeding them if you must, but DON’T take them away! 115 6/23/21 18:43:00 Judy Pridham 2048 Eastside Way Against I agree enforcing not allowing the feeding of the deer and wildlife (other than songbirds) however I DISAGREE with removing the deer from town. 116 6/23/21 18:39:08 Moriah Riley 11243 W Silver River Loop Against Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 18 of 60 Page 15 of 46 As a gardener I can fully understand the desire to keep wildlife off of my property and away from my prized garden! SO I INSTALLED A FENCE!! Under no circumstances EVER do I feel there is a need to kill a creature of God!! We all serve a purpose on this earth and we all deserve the life God gave us!! I strongly oppose this ordinance! We have absolutely no right to take the life of an animal outside of ordinary circumstances like for the purpose of food. “Nuisance” is simply not a respectable reason to end the life of an innocent animal! I strongly ask you to vote NO on this matter! Thank you 117 6/23/21 18:46:17 Janet Williamson 1225 hwy 26 Against This is a poor substitute for planning for growth. Do your homework! Have the public meetings. 118 6/23/21 18:44:23 Ann Taylor 8971 Bowmont Rd. Nampa Id. 83686 Against The educational part of this ordinance is fine. People should not be feeding the animals. But the costs associated with catching, transporting and releasing large wild animals does not make any sense in this economy. Even more troubling is the moral aspect of euthanizing these animals. It seems odd to move to a mountain town and then be bothered by the mountain animals that drew you to it in the first place. Are they 'inconvenient'? Yes. Educate, don't annihilate. 119 6/23/21 18:59:09 Anna Roy 1664 Warren Wagon Road Against We absolutely love the deer! It is what makes McCall so special! They are very welcome on our property! Please do not kill these beautiful animals to make McCall more like a city. Killing these animals will ruin the mountain life that we all enjoy. McCall is a mountain town and not a city. If one does not enjoy the forest animals, then move away. No one is making you stay! 120 6/23/21 19:02:50 Michelle Streiff 932 Strawberry Lane McCall Idaho Against I do not support moving or killing the deer. I’m okay with an ordinance to prohibit feeding wildlife. 121 6/23/21 19:26:22 Corii Williams Calgary, AB, Canada Against I was just made aware of a few disgruntled individuals in the town of McCall who are wanting to get rid of the local deer because they are a nuisance. We have been visiting McCall on and off for the past 9 years and my American husband longs to call it home one day for the reason of it's untouched beauty. The wildlife makes McCall what it is. Leave them be. Deal with the disgruntled people, not the wildlife. They were there first and should be respected as such. 122 6/23/21 19:17:49 Heather Troughton 231 NW 10th Street, Ontario Oregon 97914 Against PLEASE do not do this. Idaho is where I am from (where I work and grew up) and McCall is a beautiful place. Please do not take away WHAT IS Idaho. Wildlife is so amazing for young children to see, even older people who may have never seen anything like this. Why take them from their home, their land, for us humans to “not be bothered by them”. It’s sad. Just sad. What is happening to McCall? And for Idaho for that matter? If we can’t have/ co-exist with wildlife in the mountains cuz they “annoy” locals (new people moving from out of town), then we are on a very slippery slop... 123 6/23/21 19:36:17 Charlie Glenn 2619 fruitvale rd, Council Id Against HUGE MISTAKE. 124 6/23/21 19:42:33 Katie Gwinn 1022 Violet Way, McCall Idaho 83638 Against Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 19 of 60 Page 16 of 46 Once you start removing the animals you begin a slippery slope of choosing which animal lives. This is their home and they were here first. If residents and visitors are educated not to feed and fined if non- compliance all in McCall will win 125 6/23/21 19:48:57 Mary Beth Resimius 3315 Whitefield Lane #1569, McCall, ID 83638 Against I love our Town deer. 126 6/23/21 19:36:49 Ginger Riggins 662 Koski Dr., PO Box 1925, McCall, ID 83638 For I am for the ban on the feeding of deer in McCall. In past years I have had a summertime neighbor who has routinely fed the deer all summer long. When the couple leaves in the fall the 10-20+ deer sit on their lawn looking for food for days. Then the deer turn to my yard looking for food and destroy my bushes and trees. It's sad to see the deer being fed corn all summer, which I have been told by the Forest Service is unhealthy for the deer. In the fall during the rut the bucks become very aggressive and it is dangeous for me to even be in my own yard. Thank you for your willingness to pass a ban on the feeding of deer in McCall. 127 6/23/21 19:52:24 Britny McCoubrey 10008 W Tanglewood Dr Against Its a privilege to live near wilderness and wildlife. Spending tax money on killing wildlife in a place where it's a perk seems nonsensical to me. And many enjoy the wildlife they get to see. Some moved to McCall abd similar places FOR that privilege. 128 6/23/21 19:43:27 Meg & Steve Glasgow 235 Ernesto Drive, McCall Idaho 83638 Against "We are against the trapping, relocating or euthanizing of town deer. The wildlife in McCall is part of what makes it so special. Instead of destroying these animals, we would prefer to see more effort spent educating residents (and visitors) NOT to feed the animals and HOW to use safe methods to deter animals from gardens." 129 6/23/21 19:55:25 Kim Knuth 16 Bobcat Ct, Garden Valley, Id 83622 Against I am against the trapping, relocating, and euthanizing of the town deer in McCall. My family frequently spends time in and around McCall and we love the wildlife. Please don’t do this. 130 6/23/21 19:53:27 Tanya Masterson 2 Sawtooth Ct Against We used to have deer when we built 19 years ago in Blackhawk when there were only a few cabins. Now with so many homes we very seldom see any. I so look forward to seeing them in town. I love when I have to stop because a car is in front of me letting deer cross the highway and the kids in the car ahead are pointing and enjoying our wildlife. Please don’t do away with them. They are a part of McCalls uniqueness. Enough has already changed. 131 6/23/21 19:49:43 SUZANNE COFFEY 2112 W Neilscott Dr. Nampa, ID. 83651 Against "I have no problem with the Education section. I do have a problem with relocating or euthanization of any of the deer from inside the City limits or anywhere near the City of McCall. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 20 of 60 Page 17 of 46 My sister and brother-in-law owned the mortuary there since I was in my early teens. I practically grew up there on the weekends. At the age of 60 I still get excited to see the deer grazing in town. I can't even fathom that your taking this into consideration!!!! So many mornings I would wake up to deer in the front yard or back, that was Mountain living!! Its part of nature that was there first. Those complaining can move - and if its the guy buying the mortuary out (lol), I will gladly go knock him into next week. Got use to the school being there, but was floored when the subdivision went in. Again, Im floored that has even been brought up for discussion. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE do not vote for approval for relocating or Euthanizing the Deer out of McCall City limits. Respectfully, Suzanne Coffey" 132 6/23/21 19:58:28 Sue Switzer 224 Moonridge Dr. PO Box 4164 McCall Idaho 83638 Against The McCall "herd" has been an asset for the tourist and local community. While they are considered at times to be a nuisance, I believe most of us who live here love seeing them. There are other mountain towns who have adjusted to deer, moose, bear etc. in there towns and have accommodated them. Not relocated them. People need to be educated on how to help the deer, and how to cohabitate with them. This is their area, we have taken over their habitat. Where is the compassion for our wildlife?? 133 6/23/21 20:11:14 Christi kenley 13775 Clearview road mccall Idaho 83638 Against The fact that people are even considering such a disgusting measure is despicable. We live in the mountains. We live in deer country. Don't like it? Leave. 134 6/23/21 20:10:56 Lisa Loera-Rhinehart 300 Washington St # 214 McCall ( also P.O. Box 597 83619) Against I feel it is wrong to just move or euthanize an animal because it may visit a certain property regularly. Certainly we have to share the land with those born on it. We have a few deer that regularly visit our condo property. They’re not hurting anything. They’re not destructive like some of the human visitors can be. It’s ridiculous to try to take the wildlife out of a mountainous, forested area. Especially just to keep a few humans more comfortable. Thank You for your time on this. 135 6/23/21 20:17:09 Elena Weza 481 155th ave se Bellevue Wa 98007 Against We vacation in McCall every year and one of the things we look forward to is the deer around our timeshare. I am totally against removing them from the area. They are part of the magic of McCall. 136 6/23/21 20:17:08 Kristi Christensen 906 conifer St McCall Idaho 83638 Against We love the deer visiting our yard. Our guests always get so excited to see deer so close. Such a treat. We've moved in on the deer. They were here before us and we should respect that. 137 6/23/21 20:19:56 Molly Lewellen 2245 SW 1st Ave, Fruitland Against Keep MCCall Idaho! People that move here can learn what it’s about or leave, 138 6/23/21 20:22:59 Martha subia 820 w homedale rd Against What is our world coming to? To disregard and eliminate the nature, which by the way existed before being populated by Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 21 of 60 Page 18 of 46 humans, is a disgrace and I can’t believe the city of McCall would propose such a measure. The wildlife is one of the prize possessions of McCall. Let them be. 139 6/23/21 20:23:34 Trishanne Beckner 24689 Warren Wagon Rd Against Unfortunately the “some” people more than likely are transplants and do not understand these deer have been coming into town long before they ever thought of living in McCall. And here we are bending to the “some” people. You live in a mountain community, what did you expect. Next the city will be plowing driveways because it snows too much. Leave the deer. If you don’t like it sell. 140 6/23/21 20:26:35 Heather Hamann 409 W 1st St Fruitland, Id Against I know I do not live in McCall but I visit frequently and it would be so sad to remove animals from the home that they have had as well. Part of being in the mountains is being a part of the mountains. And part of that is living with animals and with beauty and the disturbance that it comes with. 141 6/23/21 20:28:25 Debra WINN 540 Linder Ave. Kuna, ID 83634 Against I am 100% totally against this!!! 142 6/23/21 20:35:53 Michelle koenig mnkoenig@gmail.com Against The public need to be educated to not be feeding these wild animals. 143 6/23/21 20:35:57 Teresa Lynch 805 Agate St McCall Idaho 83638 Against I am against the order to thin out the local herd of deer in mccall by any means! 144 6/23/21 20:37:20 Garth Lynch 805 Agate St McCall Idaho 83638 Against "I am against the order to thin out the herd of deer in mccall" 145 6/23/21 20:37:26 Alana Duke 117 E Butterfield St Weiser Idaho 83672 Against This is wrong 146 6/23/21 20:36:20 Ron Mattox 13650 S. Coquille St. Nampa, Idaho 83651 Against We visit the City of McCall two or three times a year. We especially enjoy the deer and we would hate to see them captured, relocated, or destroyed. The deer are a big hit with everyone. Thanks 147 6/23/21 20:34:34 Sheri Petersen 626 Blue Water Circle, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against My family has been coming to McCall for over 40 years and we have been home owners since 2009 and WE CARE DEEPLY about the deer and wildlife in McCall! We strongly oppose removing deer in McCall. This is a very bad idea! I do not know anyone that wants the deer removed. It is the mountains.....let the deer be free. Warmly, Sheri Petersen 148 6/23/21 20:50:48 Hanna Lynch 805 Agate St McCall Idaho 83638 Against I am against this proposal to thin out the herd of deer in mccall. 149 6/23/21 20:52:27 Bethany Allie 12209 W Foxhaven St, Star ID 83669 Against Our family vacations in McCall and Ponderosa State Park multiple times a year. I believe it is a terrible mistake to remove the deer from McCall. They are a large part of why we visit. They don’t bother us and we don’t bother them. We don’t feed them either. We enjoy watching them. We just visited Glacier National Park and I said to my family how much I prefer Ponderosa due to all the deer. Please leave the deer alone! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 22 of 60 Page 19 of 46 150 6/23/21 20:59:42 Ginny Ackley 250 Cold Creek Court McCall Against Enough is Enough. Don ‘t you have better things to do than to waste time and money on this. This is part of the charm of McCall and brings tourists back time after time to drive into town and “I spy the lake” or seeing the deer. 151 6/23/21 20:56:03 Jan Journey 12912 195th Ave Ct E Bonney Lake Wa 98391 Against We visit Mccall every year and look forward to seeing the deer �������. They are part of the Mccall experience. Please leave let them continue to explore the territory that was once theirs. 152 6/23/21 21:05:36 Frank Journey 12912 195th Ave Ct E Bonney Lake Wa Against It seems certain organizations are attempting to create job security in transporting wildlife. Let nature work as intended; after all, they were roaming the area before the development of what is known as McCall, Idaho. 153 6/23/21 21:14:02 Julio Vega 505 post oak lane Burleson, Texas Against "Please do not disturb the wildlife in McCall. I have been vacationing there for years. One of the great things about McCall is the wildlife. Teaching my grandchildren and seeing the excitement in their eyes when they see the animals, is priceless. Please don't take that away. " 154 6/23/21 21:23:23 Pat Farrell 14118 Tricia St. Against Leave the wildlife alone. It's their home too! 155 6/23/21 21:24:40 ReNae Bradfield 705 Broken Rein Rd, P.O. Box 841, McCall Against I am against removal or destruction of the town deer. They bring joy to myself and my 92 year old mother. I am not against penalizing those people who feed them. Please leave them alone and keep McCall “wild”. 156 6/23/21 21:25:01 Beverly wise 11428 west Hiawatha dr., Boise ID 83709 Against Absolutely against any trapping, removing, rehoming or euthanasia of any deer in or around McCall. This would be a horrible thing to do for all and should be a crime to even consider it. Ive lived in the country in Oregon, Washington, and Colorado where deer, elk, bear, cats, raccoons etc were all a part of the joy of living in the country and on acreage. They should stay. It’s their home too and they matter. 157 6/23/21 21:30:06 Melinda Thomson(Carey) 18 Chisholm Place Wyndham Vale Victoria Australia Against As a former resident of McCall what made it special was the beauty of the wildlife and nature. 158 6/23/21 21:16:04 Steve Baker 2156 E. Hyper Dr. Meridian Idaho Against "I can not believe the City of McCall wants to kill the deer and other wildlife. We are owners in Hearthstone and some of our favorite memories and highlights of our stay is seeing deer and other wildlife in the area. Family and friends that stay with us absolutely love seeing these beautiful animals. If you allow the killing of this wildlife it kills what make McCall unique and so special. Please allow these beautiful animals to live and be a part of what makes McCall stand out above other tourist areas. Thank you for your consideration. Steve Baker" Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 23 of 60 Page 20 of 46 159 6/23/21 21:16:35 Connie Ickes 1915 Bear Basin Road, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against I am very much against the current June 24th, 2021 proposal to trap, move, and potentially euthanize the town herd of deer. There has got to be a more humane way to deal with this issue!! I urge our community to work together to come up with a plan that includes a vision for the future of wildlife in our community that our children and grandchildren can be proud of. This is something that can not be undone. Please think it through carefully. 160 6/23/21 21:43:11 Kriss Steuart 628 E Woodbury meridian idaho Against Humans should be smart enough to abide with wildlife. Too bad it appears they are not. 161 6/23/21 21:44:18 Christi Smith 1855 Jones Road, Weiser, ID. 83672 Against I was born in Idaho 63 years ago and have never lived anywhere else. Growing up, I spent a lot of time in McCall and always have throughout my lifetime. Removing deer from the city of McCall is a REALLY stupid idea. Seriously, don’t you have bigger things to worry about?!? 162 6/23/21 21:45:54 Tarra owings 1369 nw 4th ave Ontario Oregon 97914 Against The town is a beautiful place and it is known for its nature and wildlife to trap and get rid of the town deer would ruin a huge part of the towns appeal. If they are considered a nuicence then I feel you are living in the wrong area. Leave the deer bee and co-excist with them 163 6/23/21 21:49:49 Amy Klingler Against the matter Against "I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. I understand culling out the sick and infected. We live in the mountains, in their backyard and it's quite unique having them around and sharing the ecosystem with them. It’s about educating not eradicating." 164 6/23/21 21:54:39 Brenda Hill 1418 Us Hwy 95 Weiser I’d 83672 Against We come several times a year to enjoy nature and wildlife in your area. We used to have a mountain home and love this area. I can’t tell you how happy it makes me to see deer wander the streets and hang out in the trees. We’re familiar with the nuisances animals can be, but the joy outweighs the hassle in most cases. We’re in their home, not them in ours. We need to respect that. 165 6/23/21 21:31:11 Dan O'Malley 1535 McCall Ave. McCall, Idaho 83638 Against "I am against the proposed wildlife ordinance. I feel that given the opportunity and proper education, locals and visitors alike can be educated regarding the harm that can be done when wildlife and people interact in negative ways. The deer have been present within city limits (and surrounding areas) nearly year-round for decades. I live in a neighborhood of the city where there are several large wooded areas. This weekend alone, I counted no fewer than 32 individuals and groups of people travelling on our street, who stopped either to view or photograph the few deer that were present and grazing on grass near the street. It was obvious that the deer were not seen as a nuisance, and rather as a type of attraction. Several of the people I saw over the weekend returned two and three times to the area to view/photograph the deer. I have witnessed these same actions by visitors and locals alike, continually throughout the year, for the 11 years I have lived in my home. I have also witnessed five negative encounters between people with their dogs and the local deer. In every instance, the deer appeared to be attempting to protect themselves or their young because an irresponsible dog owner allowed their dog(s) off leash on a public Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 24 of 60 Page 21 of 46 street/area illegally, and the dog(s) either chased after, or physically attacked the deer. In two of those instances, the dog involved was owned by an acting city council member at the time (Laura Scott). I believe that education and not eradication is the answer to this proposal, and I do believe that education will potentially be cheaper financially, with much fewer wildlife lives lost due to eradication efforts." 166 6/23/21 21:57:57 Paula Mannlein 2385 E Amity Rd Meridian ID 83642 Against Wildlife here long before people. People should be happy that they are around. Maybe remove people from wildlife habitats. Which is pretty much everywhere. 167 6/23/21 22:01:32 Shannon Riggs 8097 Waterleaf Ave Nampa ID 83687 Against I’m against harming the deer/wildlife in McCall. 168 6/23/21 21:59:00 Sherry McTigue 1437 E Lewis, Boise, ID 83712 Against "As a decades-long McCall visitor, and former resident and business owner, I emphatically oppose the proposed Wildlife Ordinance. This is unnecessary, ill-conceived and reprehensible. McCall without wildlife is like Boise without the Greenbelt. What next - drain the lake because mosquitoes are there? Please, please deny this proposal. It would be an incalculable loss to the McCall so many, many people love and cherish. " 169 6/23/21 22:11:51 Heather Potts 1017 Cee Way Loop, McCall Against I am against, if it leads to IFG removing and/or euthanizing town deer. It bothers me that Wildlife Management would allow this to happen, they are suppose to protect these animals. 170 6/23/21 22:14:27 Patty Stanbrough 753 W Tropical Dr Nampa, ID Against We just spent the weekend in McCall and had a wonderful time. Our favorite part of our visit we to see a couple of wild deer. 171 6/23/21 22:16:50 Pamela Frazer 19493 Red Eagle Way. Caldwell Idaho 83605 Against Please reject this!! The beauty and wildlife are why we come to the beautiful outdoors in McCall. There is absolutely no reason people and deer can’t live together!!! 172 6/23/21 22:20:50 Jamey McInally End of the Road Against "against this happening" a "nuisance" Really are your flowers more important then the wildlife? 173 6/23/21 22:19:35 Jan Beckwith 5378 Elk Ridge Dr, Eugene, OR 97402 Against As a long time resident of Idaho, and frequent visitor to McCall, I wish to voice my concern for any actions that might lead to removal of the wildlife in and around McCall. The wildlife are an asset to the community and belong on the land. Is there any other way to prevent artificial (people actively) feeding? 174 6/23/21 22:24:50 Stan Kalinovskiy 114 East Lake St McCall ID 83638 Against I have a 3 yr old son we love to see the freindly deer walk thru our yard to ponderosa lake every year and its really fun for the kids and adults. That's ridiculous to remove them. Strongly disagree with the proposed Stance on the matter. what is this... never been in issue and all of a sudden some people move in and want to change McCall to there liking and its a nuisance? go live somewhere else like the city were you wont see deer! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 25 of 60 Page 22 of 46 175 6/23/21 22:30:08 Dona Jeka 12604 W Murchison, Boise. Id Against Keep the deer! They are part of the appeal of McCall 176 6/23/21 22:35:26 Sara Lee 8517 HWY 95, Payette, ID 83661 Against Please let the town deer stay town deer. 177 6/23/21 22:34:54 Christine Cruickshank 311 Burns Rd, McCall ID 83638 Against Leave the deer alone. It’s part of the charm of McCall and it would be a travesty to harm them. 178 6/23/21 22:43:30 Chris Joyal P.O. Box 672 New Meadows Idaho 83654 Against I am against this 179 6/23/21 22:56:54 Barbara Langdon 302 Mather Rd #A22 Against No! I love those deer. It’s one of the highlights of being in McCall. Please do not euthanize them. 180 6/23/21 23:13:45 Susan Evans 201 Rio Vista Blvd. McCall, ID 83638 Against Wildlife is critical to the health and happiness of life in McCall. Let them remain and be loved! 181 6/23/21 23:16:03 Jennifer Stickles Boise ID 83709 Against Not for this 182 6/23/21 23:19:34 Teresa Wilson 216 Angus Lane. Donnelly, ID Against We are in their territory. Let them stay. 183 6/23/21 23:19:56 Marilyn Buchholz 208 Rosemont, San Gabriel, CA Against What a cruel and outrageous proposal. These animals have just as much right to live and to live in their current home. You should be ashamed of yourselves. 184 6/23/21 23:25:54 David Atkinson 13395 W. Paint St. Boise ID 83713 Against I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall 185 6/23/21 23:27:17 Michelle Arguello 1918 Cambridge St Caldwell idaho Against No wildlife should be killed because they are a nuacence. That is so wrong!! They have a right to life. They are beautiful living creatures and should stay that way. 186 6/23/21 23:28:09 Regan Flanagan 635 Ruby St McCall Idaho 83638Against I am highly against the trapping, relocating, and euthanization of the deer in McCall. 187 6/23/21 23:06:33 Deborah Wetherell 3550 KP Cove Mccall, ID 83616 Against The McCall City Council needs to table the wildlife ordinance and tell Fish and Game to back off. The residents of McCall need to be included in any discussion/solution regarding the resident wildlife. Furthermore, in my opinion, McCall has more urgent needs/problems to address. (affordable housing; overburdened infrastructure; growth management coupled with zoning requirements). Leave the deer alone. Tell Fish and Game to move on. McCall will manage its own resident wildlife. Let's not make national news as the lovely little Idaho mountain town that wiped out its deer population overnight. Idaho has enough of an image problem right now . . Thank you. 188 6/23/21 23:37:31 Candace Sherwin 4879 W Mystic Cove Way Boise ID 83714 Against I am against the trapping, relocating and eutanization of the McCall town deer. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 26 of 60 Page 23 of 46 189 6/23/21 23:53:38 Michelle Campbell 2304 NE 16th St. Fruitland, ID 83619 Against Please don’t remove the wildlife from the city of McCall. It is part of what makes McCall so great. 190 6/23/21 23:54:34 Joseph S Wasula 391 Silver City Drive, Boise Against I am against this stupid ordinance. Maybe we should eradicate all the people who are nuisances! There are far less of them than there are of our favorite, quiet, beautiful critters. Go ahead and pass your do not feed the animals ordinance BUT do NOT let fish and game take this measure as a call to eradicate and eliminate the animals of our beautiful state! 191 6/24/21 0:13:56 Vickie Riss 11 Wakerrobin McCall ID Against STRONGLY against. This is a horrific measure & degrading to this town. 192 6/24/21 0:16:11 Karen Roben 8045 Chancellor Drive Colorado Springs, Co 80920 Against There is no reason to euthanize. I lived in Boise at a time. I am in Colorado now, we have deer, squirrels and rabbits and I would fight the same thing if the city ever proposes such an ordinance. 193 6/24/21 0:42:55 Michele Moncure 41741 Switzerland Dr Against I am absolutely against removing the town deer. 194 6/24/21 0:05:36 Becky Thomas 570 Shelia Lane McCall Against "Before any decision can be made I feel the community needs to see concrete data on why these deer have become a “nuisance” now. You have some people on the community all fired up thinking FG is going to kill ALL of the town deer including Ponderosa Park! I hope this is not true. I think data needs to be collected, shared then a decision revisited? Maybe you have already collected data and I just have not seen it? 1. Has there been a count taken on “city deer” over the last 10 years? Has their population really increased or are they being pushed into concentrated areas because of our growth and all of the lots being filled in by housing? 2. How many out of the total population are diseased? Is it 2 or 200? 3. How many man made feeding stations are there around the city? Thank you for your time. :)" 195 6/24/21 2:16:06 Jett Newell 70 Atkin Lane Cascade, Idaho 83611 Against "Relocating" town deer is expensive in a time when local workers cannot even find housing, and this is what you are choosing to concentrate on? Ridiculous. I am against this proposal. 196 6/24/21 2:13:40 Donna Trout 2379 North World Cup Way Eagle Idaho 83616 Against I am against the trapping, relocation & euthanization of the McCall Idaho deer. 197 6/24/21 3:28:24 Jennifer Poncia Ragsdale 1010 Bitterroot Dr. McCall, ID. 83616 Against "Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I am absolutely against the trapping, euthanizing, relocating or any other such measure which could possibly bring harm to our town deer. I truly believe there is a different way, a better way. I can not imagine looking out my kitchen window and Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 27 of 60 Page 24 of 46 not seeing the mamas, babies and bucks we have seen for 12 years now. I’m honestly in shock that this is even on the table. Sincerely, Jenn R. " 198 6/24/21 5:26:18 Kathy Dillon 412 S Voyage Ave Caldwell ID 83605 Against I am completely against moving and especially euthanizing these beautiful animals who have done nothing wrong. Why would you want to change what brings beauty and uniqueness in to your wonderful city of McCall. 199 6/24/21 5:32:49 Erin Roland 10502 Galloway rd Middleton Id 83644 Against I have lived in Idaho my whole life. I travel to McCall to see the wildlife. If it’s taken away why would I come see McCall or bring revenue? Do not get rid of the wildlife. That is the reason I go to the mountains. 200 6/24/21 5:45:52 100 percent against this 1075 club rd Against Completely against 201 6/24/21 6:03:44 Rich Wright 233 Ernesto, McCall Against I do not support euthanizing city deer. 202 6/24/21 6:04:19 Dwight Peterson 233 Ernesto Dr, McCall, ID 83638 Against This is barbaric. The deer in McCall are one of the things that make McCall such a beautiful place. They provide excitement whenever they come along to say high, and to kill them all is just wrong. I do feel that there should be a law against feeding them, as that is when they could become troublesome. In my years in McCall I have never felt that the deer are a problem on my property, so I absolutely DO NOT SUPPORT this!!! These gentle creatures shouldn’t have to pay the ultimate price for living their life. 203 6/24/21 6:00:58 Katie Hudson 423 Colorado street Against "Against euthanization. Instead, measures need to be taken to enforce people to stop feeding the deer, this is attracting large amounts to locations in town where they normally wouldn't feel comfortable coming. It's all about balance, there are more humans in McCall these days, meaning more traffic and more accidents are prone to happen. An accident involving a deer in town is highly unlikely to be their fault or caused by them, the speed limits need to be followed and overall awareness of the wildlife we share our home with. Yes, I hate that the deer eating my plants but this is their home just as much as mine. Like already stated, we have created this problem by feeding and attracting them. It is unnatural and if we set rules to stop it, they will likely venture out to find food and shelter. It is easy to coexist, let's put in the effort. Control the tourist's actions that are affecting our community. Stop feeding the town deer and slow down! Another thought, stop development! Put a cap on development because natural areas are being cleared out forcing animals/wildlife from their homes...." 204 6/24/21 6:14:05 Ilene Stittsworth 4043 N Buckboard Way. Boise Idaho Against Wildlife was in your area first. It is their home. Due to excessive building and infringement on THEIR territory you should be the nuisance. Leave them alone. Overbuilding overselling land greed. That about sums it up. It used to be beautiful to drive to McCall. Not anymore wall to wall traffic and housing from Boise to McCall. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 28 of 60 Page 25 of 46 205 6/24/21 6:17:56 Doug Huntley 13764 Clear View Ct. Against "I'm 74, live in Lake Fork, but am tied to a downtown business. I've been living close to or visiting McCall my whole life and can't believe how bad the decisions are that are being made to change McCall the last several years. The issue to eliminate deer from the town is absolutely not in the best interest of anyone who enjoys the local area. Total against this!" 206 6/24/21 6:40:20 Robert West 10227 W. Twisted Vine Drive, Star, ID 83669 Against We visit McCall often to visit relatives and enjoy nature and wildlife. Removing deer from McCall would be a horrendous mistake and they truly are NOT a nuisance. Please do not pass this measure. 207 6/24/21 6:45:22 Jennifer Smith 304 McBride Unit# 102 Against "I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. Thank you in advance for taking the time to consider my stance as a long time resident of McCall. Jennifer Smith 208.315.5571" 208 6/24/21 6:54:27 Mary Tucker 447 Allen McCall ID 83638 Against We all need to slow down and enjoy the wild life. I agree that education is needed how we can live together. But…. They were here first! 209 6/24/21 6:50:42 Leila Kerschensteiner 953 N Etheridge Pl Boise Idaho 83704 Against I'm a native Idahoan, and I am shocked and horrified that this would even come up as a suggestion for the city of McCall. Stop this travesty now! Seeing deer within the city limits of McCall is not a nuisance. It's called nature at it's finest and most beautiful form! It's what makes McCall, McCall! You must not pass this ordinance. It will be a sad day for McCall and the state of Idaho if you do. 210 6/24/21 6:57:21 James Boley 53 Jughandle Drive, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against I am against the Fish & Game proposal to relocate and/or euthanize the town deer population. It goes against the very nature of our community and why I chose to live in McCall. 211 6/24/21 7:03:54 Mary Stevens 9434 Grasty Gold Mine Road Against Every time humans mess with the balance of nature (lots of coyote because we got rid of wolves) there are always bad results. Discourage people from feeding but leave things alone. We are in their territory, we need to learn to live with them... 212 6/24/21 7:07:39 Rocky Paulson 624 Ruby St McCall ID 83638 Against "Leave them alone. KTVB, KBOI well being out to you!" 213 6/24/21 7:10:44 Lorraine Hunter 954 Settlement Ave Middleton ID 83644 Against Leave the wildlife alone!! They're a huge part of McCall's charm. Bad idea to remove them... 214 6/24/21 7:15:19 Crystal Deelstra 2832 E Tiber Dr Against This is not what Idaho represents. 215 6/24/21 6:49:35 Kelli Day 409 N Samson Trl McCall Idaho Against Please do not get rid of the town deer! I know they can be a nuisance at times but it is something so unique and Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 29 of 60 Page 26 of 46 special about McCall. I have visitors all the time talking about how cool they are and even myself and my family love them as full time McCall residents. Just yesterday I was out for a run and thought to myself how special and lucky I am to live in a place that I can regularly pass wildlife on my morning run. The day before that they came up and were "playing" with our cat which was so fun to watch. Our 1 and 3 year old love seeing them out our windows when they're walking through our yard. 216 6/24/21 7:24:53 Cathy Thayer 5060 Highway 72 New Plymouth I'd 83655 Against we visit in McCall frequently one of the things we love are seeing the deer by removing killing them,You remove some of the ambience of visiting there. Don't commercialize it anymore than you already have. 217 6/24/21 7:25:45 Kayla Riggs McCall Idaho 83638 Against I am against the proposed plan of trapping, transporting, and/ or the killing of the McCall town deer. 218 6/24/21 7:22:22 Gina Thruston 109 E. Kerby, Cascade, ID Against I am totally against this proposal! It's one thing to prohibit feeding in the city limits but it's a sad shame that you would want to remove the animals or "KILL" the animals to lesson the nuisance to the city. For the majority of the people who visit McCall or live in McCall and surrounding areas, they do so because of nature and the wildlife and love to see them upon their visits to your city of which I'm sure they spend plenty of money doing so. You are taking away a learning experience for the children as well as not many children have a chance to experience the joy of seeing an animal such as this. I've seen many, many, many pictures from visitors, residents of your City and mine posting the joy of seeing these animals and how excited their family was that they could experience this during their visit. This is part of living in the Mountains, people have a choice, if they don't like what comes with Mountain living then either don't visit or sell your home and move to the City! 219 6/24/21 7:31:03 Jo anne Busch 2205E. Linden #42, Caldwell, ID 83605 Against "I agree with the people who want this deer to live, she has visited for short period over many years abd causes no or minimal problems. I do not approve of removing all the deer in McCall." 220 6/24/21 7:35:47 Aemilia Harper 2720 Tanglewood Pl, Nampa ID 83687 Against Removing the deer that live near McCall and come into town would be inhumane at BEST. Please consider letting them stay and live their lives uninterrupted by your need to make McCall a resort town, instead of the small mountain getaway town it currently is. 221 6/24/21 7:39:43 Joani Labrousse 13816 Shadow Rdg, McCall, ID 83638 Against We need our wildLIFE in McCall. 222 6/24/21 7:42:08 Patrick Cusick 7207 W Swift Ln, Boise, ID 83704 Against Encroaching on deer habitat has caused this problem, along with human-caused climate change. Culling deer isn't the answer. Managing growth and carbon emissions is. 223 6/24/21 7:45:56 Carin Gholson 4701 Collister Against Relocate or euthanize the deer??? HORRIBLE idea!!! I'm VERY much against this!!! We have overtaken their habitat! Let them be!!! 224 6/24/21 7:48:39 Ann M. Cowher 10332 Utahna Rd. Boise, Id. 83714 Against I only wish I was as lucky on a daily basis to see Gods creatures roaming free. And to think mama feels secure Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 30 of 60 Page 27 of 46 enough to have her babies there is fantastic in itself. Leave alone what God has created and the way He takes care of them. 225 6/24/21 7:55:18 Penny owens 1237 6th ave s payette id Against Do not harm our beautiful wildlife 226 6/24/21 7:57:10 Melissa Courtright 2602 College ave caldwell idaho 83605 Against I am against this happening, leave the wildlife alone to wander and come in town, we come to McCall to see the wildlife absolutely love seeing the deer especially. If people dont like it they can go move to the city with no wildlife. 227 6/24/21 7:52:45 John Fawcett 1340 Ridgeway Lane, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against "I love seeing the deer and they are definitely a tourist attraction and a vital part of our ecosystem. When our family and friends visit they love taking pictures of the deer, foxes, raccoons and squirrels! We fortunately live in the wilderness. Home for all of us! Why would anyone want to kill them? I have been coming to McCall since About 1950, I am a hunter, and the deer were living here way before any of us. We have and can coexist. In the future as wild animals wander in will you kill them too? Who started this insane idea? Vote no. Sincerely The Fawcett Family!" 228 6/24/21 8:06:33 Jeremy Courtright 2602 college ave caldwell idaho Against I am very against this proposal to get deer and other wildlife out of town leave them alone, its nature, mccall is in the middle of nature, stop trying to control the local wildlife. 229 6/24/21 8:08:23 Annette Charles 305 east lake street Neutral I think relocation is ok if it can be done with minimal harm to the deer. Not a fan of euthanizing them. 230 6/24/21 8:11:27 Christopher Culler 53 chase drive McCall, Idaho 83638 Against You’re all insane if you think euthanizing deer because they make their way into town is ok!! Where does it stop!? How far would you go!? We’re in the mountains!!! Deer will always be in town! That is part of why people fall in love with this place!! Quit being so ridiculous!!! 231 6/24/21 8:15:54 Wendy McClellin Mccwen@gmail.com Against I am against this ordinance 232 6/24/21 8:16:13 Dreena tabor 2962 w. Mark Dr. Sarasota Florida 34232 Against The animals were here first and they are precious. We need to protect them, not destroy them. The world would not be worth living in if the only life was human. 233 6/24/21 8:14:37 Arthur Alyanakian 1035 Monte Vista Ave. Los Banos, Ca. 93635 Against "Please consider the deer as a positive tourism attraction that enhances your community. Find a considerate solution to any problems. Thank you." 234 6/24/21 8:26:02 Julie Warwick 107 South 13th Ave, Caldwell, ID 83605 Against The new wildlife law you are considering would severely impact the way folks experience McCall and nature. I go to McCall and the surrounding areas often and one of the highlights of our trips is always seeing nature, and most especially deer, living in harmony with people. McCall is a wild and beautiful place and Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 31 of 60 Page 28 of 46 the deer add to the attraction. Please don't pass this law to trap, relocate and/or euthanize the deer that are just trying to live where they always have. 235 6/24/21 8:23:23 Tessi Lindley 2609 Northside Road Homedale Idaho 83628 Against I live near the Owyhee Mountains (not next to, but near) and we also get deer in our yard occasionally. We cannot relocate or eliminate all the deer every time they go into someones yard, not here, in McCall, or anywhere else.. This stands true for other animals as well. I would think people would have learned from past experience that when you remove a part of a food chain it can have far more serious consequences later (any one remember the "bunny bashing" caused by the coyotes population being almost eliminated in various places?) If they (the animals) are a danger or pose a health risk, then that is a difference scenario. If people don't want other animals in their yard they need to put up appropriate fences to keep them out. 236 6/24/21 8:22:31 Lisa Schneider 2946 Syringa Dr. New Meadows Idaho 83654 Against We have been coming to this area for years before moving here 5 yrs. Ago. The wildlife is a major part of its charm. I have no problem with the rule of not feeling the wildlife but killing the deer or removing them because they don't behave the way certain folks think is appropriate seems very harsh. Humans and wildlife have coexisted forever and adaptations from both sides are often made. Is that such a bad thing? We love our deer and McCall would not be the same without them. So sad to see our area go the way of large population areas where every inconvenience of nature is removed. 237 6/24/21 8:22:07 Mark Dooley 258 Ernesto McCall, ID. 83638 Against "In reading the proposed ordinance and the reference to people having garbage and other to ""lure, attract and entice"" wildlife. Grease is garbage and I would like to see grease added to the list of items to attract wildlife, in this case bears. Common practice to use grease to ""bait bears"" during hunting season and any person or business who has an abundance of grease disposed of outside their property should be fined until the situation is remedied. This is specifically related to Lardos. They are the only commercial kitchen in town with such a nasty mess behind their building, not even sure it meets city or health code. This results in the direct correlation of the bear population in Rio Vista. Fish and Game had to kill an aggressive bear in Rio Vista 2 -3 years ago. That is much more dangerous to people and pets than the deer are and I would like to see that problem addressed in this ordinance. I don't agree with the term ""Habituated.......... Otherwise living within city limits - outside their normally wild habitat"". Our city was built within their habitat. McCall failed the wildlife through the years by allowing developments to take place without providing for habitat preservation and preservation of natural migration patterns. The result of the City failing to develop in an appropriate manner to work with and preserve nature is to blame the wildlife. I worked for the Government for 15 years in the planning, annexation and development side and know this has already been decided. You wont change or remove the definition for Habituated I hope you will address the real issue with Lardos and the grease leading to the direct attraction of bears living in my neighborhood. Thank you Mark Dooley " Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 32 of 60 Page 29 of 46 238 6/24/21 8:40:09 Kelly Paananen 2021 N. 16th St. Boise Id 83702 Against How do you even consider them "city deer" when McCall is in the Forest? 239 6/24/21 8:39:20 Ann Pruitt 1521 Shadowbrook Drive Keller, texas 76248 Against It makes me SICK that I have to take a minute to save the life of a mama deer that is harming NO ONE. If any of you are GREATER THAN THE GOD WHO CREATED HER and gave her the RIGHT TO LIFE-- then YOU take the life of that deer and YOU take the consequences! God said "Wo unto him that wasteth flesh and hath no need"--- If we can't have compassion on the helpless in our society, then we are all doomed. Save the deer and MOVE ON to something that REALLY MATTERS in your community! 240 6/24/21 8:41:19 Deborah Moreno 829 W Riverstone Ct, Nampa, ID 83686 Against Against the removal of wildlife in town. It is one of the reasons we enjoy going to the lake and spending time in the area. 241 6/24/21 8:43:28 Val Olsen 792 Amy Court Boulder City, NV Against The deer are part of McCall's charm. We expect to see them in the mountain communities. Expect tourism to go down. Its not always about the residents. 242 6/24/21 8:39:47 Kristy Enbysk 904 N. Imperial Way, Boise, Idaho 83704 Against I am completely against this!!! As an Idahoan, the fact that we have wildlife so close to us is simply a blessing!! For decades, our family has loved seeing these gorgeous creatures outside our windows and love being able to observe their gentle nature. Whoever decided that this proposal was a good idea needs to move away to somewhere else where everything is concrete and developments!! Shame on you, City of McCall and Idaho Fish and Game for entertaining this absurd notion!!! You should be embarrassed and apologize to the people who live here and visit, bringing $$ to McCall. We come to enjoy Idaho and all it has to offer…… including the deer that our grandkids get to watch when we’re there. 243 6/24/21 8:51:17 Mike Sorensen 905 Pennfield Place, Caldwell, Idaho Against Stop this NOW! This is a ridiculous proposal and should have been shut down before it ever even started. The deer in McCall as a big part of what visitors and folks that live in McCall LOVE about being there. McCall has the perfect blend of everything, including the deer. The person who proposed this should be removed from office - clearly they don’t have the citizens and visitors that bring money into the city. Boo! 244 6/24/21 8:57:09 Stacey Hansen 308 S 230 W Jerome ID 83338 Against I oppose, this is such a heartless ordinance. 245 6/24/21 8:59:46 Margo Wyman 1607 Brooklawn, McCall, Idaho Against This is the wrong thing to do. Most visiting McCall live the wildlife. We have had a "mama" and her fawns in our back yard for many, many years and they are not a nuisance, to the contrary, they add to the uniqueness of McCall. Don't change our town....it is a HUGE mistake. 246 6/24/21 9:04:07 Robin Gerblick 2010 University Lane Pondersosa Park Against " I, and many, many others in McCall are NOT in favor of this ridiculous ordinance. We are against this proposal for obvious reasons: Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 33 of 60 Page 30 of 46 1. The research from neighboring States (WA, UT, OR, MT, WY) Fish and Game departments have shown that less than 50% of the deer survive such a ""relocation"" program, and that the cost is $600 to $900 PER DEER (in 2014 dollars). 2. We live here for a reason. For the wilderness, which is rapidly disappearing before our eyes. For the wildLIFE. For the absolute privilege and blessing it is to live Among the Wildlife (deer, bear, fox, coyotes, cougars, moose, squirrels, ground squirrels, Ravens, Steller's Jays). They all have their own unique behavior and language...it is an incredible blessing to witness daily from my home here inside the Park. But if the City of McCall and Fish and Game have their way, they will ALL be gone next year. All. It is a drastic, draconian measure we will never be able to recover from. Can you even imagine coming to McCall, in the Mountains of the Great State of Idaho and NEVER seeing a live, wild deer again? Ever? Even in Ponderosa STATE PARK? What a true travesty that would be that our children, grandchildren and visitors were never able to see a wild deer here in our beautiful town. Once fully eradicated, we cannot come back. ""Removal"" of the ""town deer"" that are *such* a ""nuisance"" may ""sound nice"", but what they are talking about is the trapping, transport OR killing of ALL of McCall's ""town deer'. No matter that they live in Ponderosa State Park. No matter that they do the ""right thing"" and migrate to lower climes at times and come back. No matter what their age. No matter if they separate Mama from her young. You get the picture. It's a travesty and Draconian measure at best. " 247 6/24/21 9:09:51 Brittney Jones 6670 S Santa Ana Ave, Boise ID, 83709 Against I am against the proposed wildlife ordinance for many reasons. As an Idaho native I think it is a shame that we build a town in the middle of a forrest and expect wildlife to conform to our demands. They were there first. McCall is known for its wildlife which is one of the reasons why the town is a state treasure. Please don’t pass the ordinance. 248 6/24/21 9:10:03 Mindy Miller 404 Virginia blvd Against I agree we need to stop feeding the wildlife but do not agree to get rid of them. These animals have been a part of our community for generations and are part of what makes McCall so special. 249 6/24/21 9:09:13 Helen Timothy 2450 Old Sharlie Lane, McCall, Idaho 83638 Against Wildlife makes McCall unique and that is why we love having our cabin there. If the deer population was diseased then I could understand it but there is no evidence to that fact. I guess you could consider bears a nuisance too but there is no proposal to relocate or euthanize them. 250 6/24/21 9:18:33 Ryan North 249 Moonridge Dr, McCall, ID 83638 Against "I am against trapping, relocating or otherwise removing deer. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 34 of 60 Page 31 of 46 If AB-168 were limited to making feeding of wildlife illegal then that would have been an entirely different matter. As it stands, AB-168 reached too far. " 251 6/24/21 9:21:38 Deanna Thomas 4405 West Saint Andrews Boise Against Save the wildlife!! 252 6/24/21 9:14:18 Mary Kolbet 10383 W Cory St. Boise. Id Against "I have been coming to McCall for over 60 years and have seen it grow from the small mountain town with small cabins and friendly people to a small town with oversized houses and out of staters who just aren’t as friendly it seems. Anyway, enough of that. Please, please don’t pass all of this ordinance. I don’t mind the no feeding but please don’t pass the rest of it. The deer, elk, and other wildlife were there long before us humans. If those who find it a nuisance don’t like the deer on their property let them be moved. Please please please don’t pass this. I love seeing the wildlife when I come to McCall. " 253 6/24/21 9:23:00 Makeesha boyum 115 s ivy St nampa id 83686 Against If wildlife is a nuisance then people should not be visiting a wildlife get away, taking innocent animals and relocating them to die to benefit rich yuppies who are moving to our beautiful state and taking away what we love about it is not ok. And those who proposed this bill with no regard that half of the relocated wildlife would probably die should be ashamed of themselves. Keep idaho beautiful and keep idaho wild. 254 6/24/21 9:34:39 RyAnn Mager 18947 Middleton Rd Nampa Idaho 83687 Against I am against this wildlife ordinance I think it will be detrimental to the natural wildlife in and around McCall 255 6/24/21 9:36:20 Tyler Mager 18947 Middleton Rd Nampa Idaho 83687 Against I am against this wildlife ordinance 256 6/24/21 9:35:08 Ron and Joni Korthals 90 Ridgeview Road, Donnelly, ID Against Not allowing wildlife in McCall would be a travesty and just one more reason for people to detest out-of-state newcomers. If we wanted to live in a barren wildlife-less place, we can move to the big city! Don't mess with what we have! 257 6/24/21 9:25:17 Pamela Eskelin Reichel 7905 152nd St. Ct. East, Puyallup, WA 98375 Against I am AGAINST the local Fish and Game's agenda/proposal to trap, remove, euthanize ALL of the town deer in McCall, due to them being a "Nuisance". This is a terrible idea! I spent many summers and winters as a child visiting McCall and was outraged to even hear of such an awful idea! The wildlife are there to be enjoyed and protected. Shame on you for even thinking of such a horrific plan! Fish and Game promotes their "Project Wild" program to children which encourages the appreciation of wildlife, something you should consider! The deer have not invaded and are a nuisance, people are!! 258 6/24/21 9:45:39 Malee Thomas 19114 Galloway rd Caldwell I'd. 83607 Against You are living in their home . Most people love being close to nature it brings tourists and if you choose to live Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 35 of 60 Page 32 of 46 there it is part of the beauty. The tax payers should not be funding relocation when we moved into their homes. 259 6/24/21 9:51:01 Wendy Loomis 16 Usher Drive Against I'm against this! 260 6/24/21 9:49:56 Paul Thomas 19114 Galloway rd Caldwell Is. 83607 Against Not something we should be doing to justify a job. Other things are in desperate need of supervision not deer in town, who are a tourist draw card 261 6/24/21 9:47:37 Lisa Durning 22753 Zephyr Ct Caldwell, ID 83607 Against I am against removing wildlife from McCall city limits. People that are moving into this area need to coexist with local wildlife. This is their home, and the mountains around McCall have been their home for longer than the existing homes. My husband and I also own property in Cascade, as well as in Caldwell. We bought our property in Valley County knowing full well we would be sharing it with all of the local wildlife. That means we accept the positive aspects of seeing and enjoying wildlife, along with their natural behaviors, which might not always be positive. It’s not right to eradicate wildlife just because they are a “nuisance”. 262 6/24/21 9:59:18 Helen Powers 1503 Roosevelt Ave., McCall, ID. 83638 Against Deer were here first, we are just borrowing the space, feed them if you want or not, not your place to decide who stays and who goes, you are only here for a period of time. 263 6/24/21 9:59:48 Chris Reichert 908 Specht Ave CALDWELL idaho 83605 Against Wildlife have been in and around McCall for YEARS and NOW you want to mess up the natural order of the animals for what?!?!?! They're habitat was crowded into in order for McCall to even be built in the mountains, but you didn't see them throwing a fit and organizing meetings to have humans removed from their area!!! Dont over take nature if you dont want nature to be in your backyard!!!! 100000% AGAINST THIS IDIOTIC MOVEMENT!!!!!!!!!!! 264 6/24/21 10:05:01 Angela Shoecraft 2341 Hill rd Boise, ID 83702 Against The reason people escape to the mountains it to be with wildlife and now they want to kill them because they are an inconvenience? I am against the trapping, relocating and euthanizing of the town deer of McCall. 265 6/24/21 10:15:35 Kendall Northcutt 423 Floyde St McCall ID 83638 Against The deer are a magical part of McCall!! It is human error, not the fault of the deer. Please, please, please do not euthanize. 266 6/24/21 10:14:23 Brenda Jansson 8958 W Candleston ct boise idaho Against Sorry the deer are such a nuisance to you but WE like them here. And just in case you didn't know, WE are encroaching on THEIR land, NOT the other way around. I'm sure the Native Americans felt the same way when they were targeted for being a 'Nuisance'. 267 6/24/21 9:58:47 Destiny Platt 12685 Hereford Rd, Donnelly, ID 83615 Against I am in agreement with not feeding the wildlife. However I am completely against relocating or euthanizing wildlife under the guise of being a nuisance in their own habitat. People who choose to move to the mountains should fully expect interactions with local wildlife. If they are unhappy with this then they can Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 36 of 60 Page 33 of 46 move to a more populated city that is further away from wildlife. Alaska does not euthanize or relocate their local wildlife simply for being around humans and within city limits. McCall shouldn't either. 268 6/24/21 10:16:24 Kim Mitchell 12650 wild rose lane Nampa id 83686 Against With all new housing, wildlife are being weeded out as it is. Totally against 269 6/24/21 10:22:19 Zoe Metcalf 11515 w Silverview st boise Idaho Against Please do not remove wildlife 270 6/24/21 10:21:28 Karen Hancock 1209 E Dewey Ave Nampa, ID 83686 Against I am incredibly against this happening. Wildlife should be preserved, not eradicated for being a “nuisance.” 271 6/24/21 10:09:13 Madison Hamilton 949 E Travel Ln, Kuna Idaho Against “Animals should NOT require our permission to live on earth. Animals were given the right to be here long before we arrived”. - Anthony Douglas Williams 272 6/24/21 10:31:19 Karen and James Bouden 5895 Ensign Ave. Against We are against the removal of town deer!!! This is their home! People are the ones that need to make adjustments to our lives to help them!!! Removing, separating families , or killing them is cruel!!! It is the same thing as removal of people SHAME SHAME SHAME on those thinking of doing this! I was born in Idaho and it is unique and beautiful Which includes getting to see our wildlife and enjoy it! 273 6/24/21 10:34:36 LaDessa Foster 12681 Hereford Against "I have been coming to our family property in Valley County since the mid 1960s. As humans we have encroached on wildlife habitats. Leave the deer alone. The are not predatory and cause no harm to humans. There is no reason to euthanize them! They are part of living in the Idaho mountains. Families living in McCall and Valley County for generations love seeing them. I have observed the joy in others seeing them for the first or hundredth time. Thank you!" 274 6/24/21 10:41:02 Darla Weekes 5815 Oak St Nampa ID Against My family vacations up there every year! One of the most enjoyable experiences for the adults and our kids is to watch the deer... I cannot understand why anyone would think this is okay! If you don't like nature then you should move to the city!!! Please don't do this!!! 275 6/24/21 10:48:47 Leila Farley 902 N. Imperial Way, Boise, Idaho 83704 Against What a horrible thing to consider. Stop this nonsense! The deer are one of the amenities that make McCall special. Let’s eradicate the people that came up with this stupid idea! 276 6/24/21 10:55:33 Christy Schill-Newbold 601 East Ash Street Caldwell Idaho Against Against removing the natural wildlife from McCall. One of the most beautiful experiences in our State is being near wildlife especially the deer. 277 6/24/21 11:00:10 Cathy Jasperson P O Box 412, McCall, ID Against I DO NOT want this ordinance. There are ways to coexist with these beautiful creatures. 278 6/24/21 10:53:03 karen Bouden 5895 Ensign Ave. Garden City Idaho 83714 Against I wrote a comment earlier But I forgot to include my city in my address section. And want to be sure you include it and read it. This is a cruel proposal! taking wildlife from their homes that they have Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 37 of 60 Page 34 of 46 lived in for ever. to relocate them to an area they are not familiar with and to separate families or kill them. Reminds me of the removal of jews!!! We are living in their home! People are the ones that need to make adjustments to live with the deer. I was born here. We need to keep Idaho unique and beautiful with all of its wildlife! McCall has been my playground for all of my life! I do not want to see it without Deer!!! 279 6/24/21 10:59:33 Scott Thibodeau 626 Syringa a Dr Against My in-laws. And. I own a vacation home in McCall this will be my wife and I retirement home we love McCall for the wild life. Including the deer this matter will change the mountain feel of McCall 280 6/24/21 11:02:27 Lannie Davis 9850 W. Westview Against "I am against this this happening. " 281 6/24/21 10:59:15 Shannon Ochoa 14183 Hancock Rd. McCall Against We’ve been here for 20 years. We enjoy the wildlife. We never complained about the deer and we never hear any complaints. Tourists enjoy seeing the wildlife. 282 6/24/21 11:03:53 Lynn Wayne 2068 John Alden Against Seeing the deer and wildlife around our homes is an important part of the McCall experience. PLEASE do NOT remove and kill these beautiful deer! 283 6/24/21 10:44:25 Jenny Fawcett 1340 Ridgeway Lane Against The deer in town have been here for a long time and they will continue to come into town - feeding the wildlife or not. We live in their habitat. Education is important. Killing/transporting is an outlandish/cruel idea. Someone has taken a very myopic view of what “they” think should be done with the deer. Is this job justification for F&G? Nothing better to do? I am nearing 70 and I have seen a lot of foolish things “accomplished” by F&G. Many years ago someone with F&G had the brilliant idea to introduce mackinaw into Payette Lake. We no longer can catch silver sides or trout to levels in the past. Re-introduction of a specific species of wolf? Really? Unless you are out in areas where you can see the damage to elk herds from wolves one will not understand. There are other towns and cities that have taken a much more realistic approach to dealing with the wildlife in their human inhabited areas. Learn from them before you make such a harsh decision that will have long term effects on our way of life here. Spray some deer fence on your flowers - don’t kill the deer. 284 6/24/21 11:09:10 Vicky Perez 13496 S Hall Topock, AZ 86436 Against As former owner of property next to the Park I never had any problems with the deer!! As for drivers thats another story!! Slow down, view the wildlfe!!!! 285 6/24/21 11:11:36 Cathy Mosman 155 E Lake Fork Rd#1941 McCall ID 8363 For I support the proposal. 286 6/24/21 11:16:00 Julie Warwick 107 South 13th Avenue, Caldwell, ID 83605 Against I understand that a yes vote on the not feeding wild animals will also result in Fish and Game beginning the gathering and relocation or euthanization of animals. This is completely unacceptable! Obviously this was the animals home first! We visit McCall often and part of the reason is that we can see so many different beautiful animals in such close proximity to town. It would be unconscionable to Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 38 of 60 Page 35 of 46 remove them from their homes. Please do not pass the ordinance regarding the feeding of wild animals. Thank you. 287 6/24/21 11:10:50 Sara Powell Floyd St Against "I can not believe that you would just euthanize an animal for being in city limits when McCall was and is in a forest area… these animals natural habitats for years. How many cities do you know that currently do this. Seems very inhuman and a lazy way to “fix” this problem. Perhaps they need relocated further into the forest rather than just put down. This is no different than moving next to an established ball park or golf course and complaint about the balls coming in their yard or the noise of cheering fans. None of this seems like a good solution the animals, but rather your easy fix. I hope you reconsider this option and perhaps look for a different solution than just euthanasia. " 288 6/24/21 11:15:37 Benita and Alan Giltzow 199 Hazel Place Donnelly, Idaho 83615 Against We are against the eradication of town deer and any other animals by the City Council and Fish and Game! Are dogs and cats next? 289 6/24/21 11:24:36 Lisa Wood PO Box 1836, McCall ID 83638 Against Please leave our town deer alone. We can co exist with education. I oppose any use of taxpayers $$ to be used in any way eradicate the town deer. 290 6/24/21 11:25:12 Ashlea Gray 22 Timberline Drive Donnelly ID 83615 Against My name is Ashlea Gray and I’m a 3rd generation McCall native. I am against the trapping, relocating, and euthanizing of the town deer. If this goes throw it would be a devastation to the animals and the people alike. 291 6/24/21 11:12:29 Linda Estes 1508 W Colorado Ct Nampa ID 83686 Against People travel to McCall not only for the lake and it beauty but to have a chance for a first hand experience of enjoying the wildlife as well. How many children would not have this opportunity?? Councilmen and women would you deprive you grandchildren of this opportunity? I think not!! My husband and I are not boaters however when we travel up north and see a deer it becomes a successful trip. 292 6/24/21 11:29:31 Barbara Brown 1533 Warren Wagon Rd Against Against this proposal 293 6/24/21 10:56:24 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive McCall, ID 83638 PO Box 2755 McCall, ID 83638 Against "I voted NO last week and again this week regarding the ""No-Feed"" Ordinance. After attending the city council meeting in person on June 10th I am vehemently opposed to this ordinance being voted on and/or passed at today's meeting or in the future. The City has NOT been transparent with the apparent Fact that a ""Yes"" Vote on the No-Feed Ordinance is a Death Sentence For All Deer In and Around McCall. Regardless of whether the deer are in town, in Ponderosa State Park, in Bear Basin, on Brundage Mountain, in Jug Mountain Ranch, in Blackhawk on the River, in RiverRanch, no matter if the deer do the ""right thing"" and migrate in/out, up or down from McCall. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 39 of 60 Page 36 of 46 What you DID NOT TELL THE PUBLIC is that a ""Yes"" Vote will start a horrific Train Reaction giving local Fish and Game the ""Go-Ahead"" to immediately start the process to eradicate all town deer. This is a irreprehensible, uneducated and short-sided decision that You UNILATERALLY are making For ALL OF US, that will not only affect those of us who live here and call McCall home but those generations to come. Including 2nd homeowners, visitors and tourists. The First step MUST BE for the City Council to TABLE the no-feed ordinance and tell Fish and Game to STAND DOWN. There are so many more pressing problems and issues in McCall that need the attention of our City ""Leaders"". The deer by far, are LAST on the list. Who is so strongly spear-heading this and WHY? And why so suddenly? Follow the POWER OR THE MONEY and you will typically always find out. Fish and Game? Local Police? Local City Manager? Local City Mayor? Which of them grew up here? Which have spent their childhood years into adult years here enjoying all McCall has to offer and the sheer beauty and magic and PRIVILEGE of living among the deer and other wildlife? Are they really OK with forever altering the beauty and magic of McCall? For EVERYONE? To what end? Who are they playing to? I highly doubt any of them will want to brag to their children, grandchildren and future generations that ""THEY WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING ALL OF THE TOWN DEER"". Is THAT the legacy they want to leave? Blood on their hands? And WHY? Do our City Council Members, City Manager and City Mayor Actually even KNOW that if they pass the no-feed ordinance that Fish and Game will immediately begin the eradication process (euthanization of ALL TOWN DEER)?? Are they actually OK with that? If they DON'T Know Or Understand This, then WE need to ask, demand that they ALL STAND DOWN. McCall has ALWAYS been a sanctuary for humans and wildlife alike. Please do not “City-fi” and pave over and alter forever the last vestiges of this beautiful MOUNTAIN town. We LIVE in the mountains for the wilderness experience. We live here because we CAN co-exist with the deer and other wildlife. We live here because is NOT Boise or any other large concrete city. We are going down a very horrid path we can never return from. Once it’s gone, once the deer are gone, this magic, this beauty is GONE FOREVER. I urge you to DO THE RIGHT THING. Table this ordinance AND vote, and step back to re-evaluate what you are doing. We NEED to preserve McCall. The deer BELONG TO ALL OF US." 294 6/24/21 11:34:16 Cindy Boyce 1531 McCall Ave. McCall, Idaho 83638 For Please stop feeding the animals. Please DO NOT relocate them. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 40 of 60 Page 37 of 46 295 6/24/21 11:28:41 Kelcey Gentry 711 N 6th St Parma, Idaho 83660 Against For years my family have visited McCall multiple times a year, with family having cabins in different area's around the lake. We come up to be able to enjoy the mountains and watching the deer and fox in our yard! Our favorite memories include waking up in the morning to the baby deer and baby fox wondering in the yard, with momma not to far. As we watch them they always come right up next to the window, as if saying "Good Morning". If our wildlife is removed, we will no longer be able to share this amazing experience with our next generations, it will no longer be an experience we get to have every year, and a big reason we come back to McCall year after year. 296 6/24/21 11:37:58 Niky Hoffman 138 N 17th St wheeling we 26003 Against The absurdity of this should be evident. All life is precious, all of it. 297 6/24/21 11:39:30 Jennifer Thornfeldt 960 Conifer St, McCall, ID 83638 Neutral For the feeding ban. AGAINST killing them or relocating them 298 6/24/21 11:41:38 Tuck Miller PO Box 2002 McCall Idaho Against "Not Natural, Not Sustainable. The McCall Mayor got it right when he said the situation with deer in McCall is not natural and not sustainable. The endless crush of humanity that is destroying wildlife habitat is absolutely not sustainable and is not natural. McCall and Valley County have joined headlong in the destruction of wildlife habitat with development, activities and roads that are destroying wildlife habitat at an unsustainable rate. We have a problem with humans not deer. Human development has essentially destroyed all the deer, elk, and antelope wintering habitat in the Treasure Valley. That crush of uncontrolled humanity is now creeping up the hill in Dry Creek and Avimor and Highways 55 and 95 have become Kill Zones for deer, elk, and any other wildlife that wanders onto the roadways. The deer and elk migration corridors are threatened by the continued development of every river corridor in our area and now planned developments, mines and roads will take the rest. The Police Chief mentions the problem of dead and maimed deer in a town with a 25 mph speed limit. Again, it is not deer that are the problem but the crush of reckless drivers in an armada of vehicles. Oh yes, and dogs at large. Both of these are enforcement issues. As I sit here, watching vehicles running down Lick Creek Road at 50 mph, I wonder where the enforcement is. Gigantic, energy inefficient homes and endless development not only destroys habitat locally and displaces wildlife but is the root of habitat loss on a global scale. More dams and coal mines for electricity have destroyed the rivers of the West and we have lost salmon and so many of the native fish of the West. These river corridors are now just killing fields for migratory wildlife and gurgle with methylmercury and carp so we can build more houses and more developments. We have extirpated Sockeye and Chinook Salmon from Payette River and our Lake. Bighorn Sheep and Antelope are long gone around McCall, Columbia Sharptail Grouse, Sage Grouse, Monarch Butterflies, native Trout, Mountain Quail, Mountain Goats, Grizzly Bears, Pronghorn Antelope—all hang by a thread. We cannot count on the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Department to make wise choices here. They have been nothing but a Holding Company for Extermination over the years and are politically Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 41 of 60 Page 38 of 46 neutered by the State government. One need only review the recent wolf actions by the Fish and Game Department and the State to understand how castrated they are in dealing in wildlife issues. There has been a 68% loss of wildlife worldwide since 1970. Migratory fish species have declined 72% since 1970. Deal with that Idaho Department of Fish and Game and stop nibbling around the edges and dumping hatchery fish and non-native species into our environment. This is not sustainable and it is not natural. In a hundred and fifty years, we have lost so many local, iconic species to human development. Now, we think we have a problem with deer in McCall. We have a problem with humans and their greedy tendencies. They are not natural and they are not sustainable—the Mayor is absolutely correct. We need to do a better job managing ourselves, not deer. Tuck Miller McCall, Idaho" 299 6/24/21 11:39:21 Ardis Hewitt 7062 E Los Carneros Drive Boise Against As a former resident for a decade in McCall I’m gobsmacked to learn of this proposal to dispose of the city deer that wander about the community. Are you kidding?? Do not let a minority of anti-wildlife and conservation new residents and homeowners mess with part of the charm and wildlife of McCall. 300 6/24/21 11:32:40 Meredith Carlson 2119 W Bannock St Boise ID, 83702 Against As a born and raised Idahoan and frequent visitor to the area, I am greatly against the removal/destruction of our “nuisance” town deer. Being able to live close to and see the wonderful nature that Idaho has to offer is why we live here. 301 6/24/21 11:45:24 Christine Reino 129 Stibnite #7, McCall, ID 83638 Against Another solution should be sought. 302 6/24/21 11:47:32 Lynne Lawless 635 Samson Trail McCall Idaho 83638 Against I think that it would be more harmful to move the deer. There are other options we can take one being signage about not feeding the wildlife and educating the public rather than moving the deer. I think it would be detrimental to McCall. 303 6/24/21 11:54:13 Pamela Weathers 16865 Bryant Ave., Dos Palos, CA 93620 Against The wildlife is one of the main reasons we maintain a family vacation home in Idaho. Nuisance is one who does damage, intimidates or threatens. To some... anything is a nuisance. The wildlife was here first...and is one of the most attractive things about Idaho. If wildlife is a nuisance perhaps as ps you've chosen the wrong place to live. 304 6/24/21 12:01:56 Joan Whitacre 3300 Whitefield Ln, McCall, ID 83638 Against I am against the proposed wildlife ordinance resulting in any interference, intervention, or control of the wildlife population in the City of McCall. I also consider Ponderosa Park and other State or Federal properties beyond the authority of the City Council of McCall regarding this ordinance. 305 6/24/21 11:39:56 Katie Lynn Strode 814 Carico CRT. For "I grew up here in McCall and the deer have never been so noticeable invasive as they are now and are clearly a Nuisance at restaurant parking lots, and in town blocking the roads a lot of the time. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 42 of 60 Page 39 of 46 Folks also need to stop feeding them. The deer need to be thinned out or gone. They have no natural thinning process in town and have no Predators from what I have seen. Most mommas have twins so the amount of deer is over loading the city and are getting out of control of eating folks landscape in their yards. They have chased my dog and attracted it at my front door. They have attracted my neighbors dog on the leash when she walked down the street. They will eventually make their way back but for now they are definitely a Nuisance. " 306 6/24/21 12:05:39 Shelly Miiller 3286 S. Norfolk, Boise, Id 83706 Against This seems extreme. How about putting signs up and educating people. It’s not like they are killing peoples dogs and cats or farmers sheep! 307 6/24/21 12:12:22 Shirley duffy 1100 Burnett 358. Nampa,Idaho Against I like to drive to McCall to see some of the wildlife. It's always a surprise to see deer in people's yards or even in tjown.To take this away from humans is insane. These animals have been here long before us and to disrupt the would be cruel. That is my opion 308 6/24/21 12:20:15 Denise McNamee 5171 s Yarrow Ave Boise ID 83716 Against "Wildlife is a draw for tourism in McCall. This is a very drastic and sad proposal - totally against " 309 6/24/21 11:57:49 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive McCall, ID 83638 PO Box 2755 McCall ID 83638 Against "We must educate, not eradicate when it comes to McCall town deer I attended the June 10, 2021, McCall City Council meeting in person to listen and learn more about two “proposals” the City of McCall is currently considering regarding our town deer. The first proposal is putting an ordinance in place making it illegal to feed deer and all wildlife in McCall with the exception of song birds. The second “proposal” of much more concern due to its draconian measures, is giving Idaho Fish and Game the go-ahead to trap, relocate or euthanize all of our town deer. This will happen if our city council votes on and passes the “illegal to feed wildlife” ordinance. This will also happen without any public hearing or without any public input by our full-time and part- time residents, taxpayers and visitors/tourists. Unless you speak up now. I am OK with an ordinance to not feed the deer and wildlife in McCall. I am not OK with the notion of trapping, transporting and/or euthanizing all of the town deer simply due to them being a “nuisance.” Just yesterday, Mama Deer (who has been giving birth to her fawns in my side yard for 11 consecutive years) and her day-old twins scampered across the fairway on the McCall Golf Course where I am a full- time resident. Golfers, one visiting from Arizona, stopped their play and excitedly exclaimed “Aww, look! Baby fawns! Quick, get a photo”! I simply cannot imagine a McCall without “town deer.” I’ve been Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 43 of 60 Page 40 of 46 enjoying McCall for 58 years with my family and friends at our family cabins over the years, and there have always been town deer. Can you imagine being a visitor to Ponderosa State Park in the great state of Idaho and never being able to witness the majestic beauty of a wild deer? They are a part of the fabric of McCall. May as well remove the expensive signage they put throughout the park letting visitors know of the wildlife they are “likely to see” in the park. Or tell them as they enter the park, “Sorry, but to see a wild deer, you will have to go to a big-city zoo.” What a travesty it would be if our children, grandchildren and visitors were never to see a wild deer or fawn in McCall ever again. What in the world are our city officials thinking? And all due to the deer being a “nuisance?” After doing considerable research by talking with Fish and Game wildlife biologists, wildlife officers, and wildlife conflict specialists in Idaho as well as our neighboring states of Washington, Utah, and Oregon, we have much to learn. Each had come to the same conclusion, that trapping and relocating deer, known as “translocation,” did not work due to two primary reasons: 1. Over 50% die during or shortly after the transport, and 2. The exorbitant cost ($600 to $900 per deer). If we allow this to happen in McCall, who will be paying for that? Certainly not Idaho Fish and Game? Certainly not the City of McCall? The taxpayers? One wildlife officer said to me “Fish and Game shouldn’t be getting involved at all.” He also said that the “deer belong to all of us” and that one governmental agency should not be allowed to take that from the local residents and visitors. There are other alternatives that we can consider first before we got down a slippery slope that we can never recover from: 1. If traffic issues are “the most common problem” with our deer, would it not be much more cost effective to actually enforce the speed limit? 2. In the 58 years I have been spending time in McCall and now living here full-time for 12 years, I have not once seen a mountain lion. Have there always been occasional sightings during the winter or spring months? Of course. Towns and cities from neighboring states simply post a general warning about sightings, or capture and re-release the lion vs. eradicating an entire herd of deer. 3. Of course deer sometimes become aggressive toward people and dogs, most often in the spring when they are caring for newborn fawn. Again, why not educate the public on how to live with" 310 6/24/21 12:29:41 Jon Umbdenstock 203 n. Heigho New Meadows, 83654 Against The wildlife is what makes our area special. 311 6/24/21 12:30:53 Julie Conrad 1423 Eagle Drive McCall, ID 83638 PO Box 2755 McCall, ID 83638 Against "(Continued from previous comment submission). 3. Of course deer sometimes become aggressive toward people and dogs, most often in the spring when they are caring for newborn fawn. All mammals and wildlife are highly protective of their young. Again, why not educate the public on how to live with wildlife as our neighboring states do as well as enforce city off-leash dog laws? 4. The exotic lice species in deer described by F&G does not affect humans or domestic animals. Deer in captive settings have been successfully cleared of lice infestations with the use of medication. Many cases resolve on their own when the deer are in better condition in spring/summer due to increased food resources or with seasonal environmental changes Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 44 of 60 Page 41 of 46 5. Why not put the no-feed ordinance in place then use a fraction of the funds it would take to trap and move, and put that toward a massive education campaign for locals and visitors alike? Why are we allowing a handful of people to decide the fate of one of the most endearing traits of McCall by eradicating the local town deer? The deer do indeed belong to All of us. The city has many more pressing problems that it ought to be working on. I urge our city leaders and city officials to take a big step back before it’s too late, before we can never recover from a very poor decision. Educate, not eradicate. (Julie Conrad lives in McCall.)" 312 6/24/21 12:32:26 Joanne Conrad 2569E Whitebud Court Meridian, Idaho Against One of the main reasons I travel to McCall is to see the deer. Please don’t remove them as then there will be no reason to go to McCall. 313 6/24/21 12:33:57 Haley Paulsen 24549 Fern Lane Wilder, ID 83676 Against I grew up in McCall - it is a second home for me and I am COMPLETELY AGAINST this! Please leave the deer alone, they are doing no harm! 314 6/24/21 12:32:52 Sandra Stern sandystern208@gmail.com Against My family has been long time property owners, visitors and residents in Valley County and the McCall area. I am against the trapping, relocating, and/or euthanizing of the town deer in the City of McCall. Please remember McCall and people are impeding on the deers natural habitat not the other way around. McCall is a resort town and a mountain community with many new “city” residents and vacationers that do not understand wildlife and are fearful of them or feed them. We as a community need to do a better job through partnerships with Fish and Game and City of McCall’s resources to educate about the deer and other wildlife not eliminate their presence. The deer herds are a beautiful attraction not a distraction. Please do not eliminate the charm of our beloved mountain escape by making it void of the treasures our Idaho mountain communities offer. 315 6/24/21 12:28:05 Marilyn Olson 890 Timber Ridge Ct, McCall, Idaho, 83638 For I support educating the public with a wildlife ordinance against feeding wildlife in the city of McCall. I am against the current proposal to trap and remove the town deer. I think education would be a good place to start and possibly putting more police presence along Davis Street where several deer have been killed due to excessive speed by drivers. Thank you for your time and consideration. 316 6/24/21 12:33:48 Ashlyn Bideganeta 522 E Washakie street Meridian Idaho 83646 Against "Hi there, I would like to very seriously vote no on this proposed plan for the deer and wildlife in the city of McCall. As an Idaho native and someone who’s spent many many summers in the city of McCall, I can say 1st hand that the deer within the city of McCall pose no unnatural threat to campgrounds or public lands when humans act responsibly. Deer live in the mountains and the mountains were there before the town. As they say in Costa Rica, “don’t be a victim” which in this case, means use your brain when it comes to wildlife. Drivers, pedestrians, and all people should take personally responsibility for themselves and their safety around McCall wildlife, specifically deer in this case. Please to not violate the home we so joyfully share with these deer and please do not harm, move or alter the beautiful wildlife, including the deer. in McCall. We do not want restrictions placed on our Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 45 of 60 Page 42 of 46 interactions with these animals, rather the freedom to use common sense and continue to enjoy the land we share. Thank you and sincerely, Ashlyn Bideganeta " 317 6/24/21 12:38:55 Michelle Sanders 1500 S. Harmon Rd. Fallon, NV 89406 Against DO NOT KILL THE DEER!!!! THEY ARE A PART OF THE BEAUTY OF MCCALL !!! I VISIT MCALL OFTEN AND THE FIRST THING MY ENTIRE FAMILY LOOK FOR IS THE BEAUTIFUL DEER. AND FOR THE ONES THAT ARE COMPLAINING, THEY NEED TO LEAVE THE AREA!!! # ALL WILDLIFE LIVES MATTER 318 6/24/21 12:44:16 Ina Harts 2333 W Palouse St Against "Wildlife needs to always be preserved, the real nuisance is the public who don't want them to be in their natural surroundings. When visiting McCall and other areas it brings us joy to see deer, elk etc. To take that away then what is the point of coming to McCall!" 319 6/24/21 12:51:14 Keynan Fanslow 13206 S Pine River Way Nampa 83686 Against Do not want to see deer removed from the city! 320 6/24/21 12:50:59 AnnMarie Halverson 1112 Alpine St, McCall, ID 83638 For I have lived here for 8 years, and over the last three years the town deer problem has gotten out of control. It is very obvious (and I am no wildlife expert) that the deer population is not healthy. The fact that people are feeding the deer is only adding to the problem, and it is frustrating that these folks do not see it as a problem. An excessive deer population does not belong in town, especially with the increase in tourism and traffic. The deer are becoming a nuisance and the population needs to be controlled. I am in favor of ticketing people who are found to be feeding the deer. 321 6/24/21 12:59:26 Barbara A Lutz 5208 E Homedale Rd Caldwell idaho 83607 Against It is just a shame that you would go so far as kill or remove all the deer or wildlife from the city limits of McCall. You go to the mountains to be with nature see things you cant see in the city animals are part of that We are taking their land they are just trying to enjoy what was theirs. If the people who dont like animal should just stay in the city where they do not have to put up with them. Please understand this is the animals land we have taken over it is not their fault why punish them!!!! the people of mccall live there because they love the mountains, the lake and the wildlife... Thank you for listening 322 6/24/21 13:02:57 Renee Baird 13723 Hockberger Ranch Road, Caldwell, ID 83607 Against My daughter is in real estate in McCall and we visit there often, Myself, my family and clients that I have sent her way, all appreciate and love seeing the deer in McCall… it brings a special charm to your town that should never go away, don’t lose one of McCalls biggest asset and charm they bring to all those who visit and live there. Don’t give into the politics of growing and pushing out the animals that are such a joy to see. 323 6/24/21 12:58:33 Laura Kirk 623 Syringa Dr Mccall ID For It should be illegal feed all of the wildlife. Just as you cannot do this in state and federal parks. It’s not healthy or sustainable. It attracts more animals than the habitat can support and creates a nuisance. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 46 of 60 Page 43 of 46 324 6/24/21 13:13:51 Deanne Seiler P.O. Box 3225, McCall Against It’s so sad what you want to do. I support NOT killing or moving the deer. Please listen to the impassioned pleas of those who care. Thank you 325 6/24/21 13:16:25 Cathy Buffington 3049 S Terri Way Against I am adamantly against the euthanasia of wildlife, specifically deer, in the City of McCall. The wildLIFE, among many other things, is what makes the town so wonderful! 326 6/24/21 13:20:42 Diane Sanders 653 Woodlands Dr Against I love our town deer, but stop feeding them. 327 6/24/21 12:48:51 Emily Hart 702 1st Street McCall, ID 83638 For "Last night, I was sitting in my yard with a friend, and the most adorable tiny fawn leapt out of the tall grass, practically into our laps. I, too, am completely charmed by occasions like this, and I love animals. However, I re-iterate everything I said in my previous comment about the town deer. In reference to this week's Opinion in today's Star-News by Julie Conrad, I dispute her claim that ""there have always been town deer."" I have lived in McCall for 45 years, and this is simply not true. Seeing a deer in town was an anomaly, and there most certainly was not a pack of 15 living in my yard all winter. This situation will only get worse. Research the deer situation in Ashland, Oregon, and get a glimpse of what our future may be if we don't act now. " 328 6/24/21 13:29:35 Amy Kohler Daveamykohler@gmail.com Against Keep the animals in their homes! 329 6/24/21 13:29:31 Karissa Tatom 4498 E Thomas Mill Drive Nampa, ID 83686 Against Euthanizing the town’s deer is a terrible idea. They are a huge part of the appeal of McCall. 330 6/24/21 13:30:19 Denice Ruse-Sullivan 2921 n 36th st Boise Idaho 83703 Against I am totally against this, the animals were here 1st , leave them alone! 331 6/24/21 13:36:12 Suzette Driscoll 1664 S Sportsman Way Meridian Idaho 83642 Against " The City has NOT been transparent with the apparent Fact that a ""Yes"" Vote on the No-Feed Ordinance is a Death Sentence For All Deer In and Around McCall. Regardless of whether the deer are in town, in Ponderosa State Park, in Bear Basin, on Brundage Mountain, in Jug Mountain Ranch, in Blackhawk on the River, in RiverRanch, no matter if the deer do the ""right thing"" and migrate in/out, up or down from McCall. A ""Yes"" Vote will start a horrific Train Reaction giving local Fish and Game the ""Go-Ahead"" to immediately start the process to eradicate all town deer. This is a irreprehensible, uneducated and short-sided decision. The First step MUST BE for the City Council to TABLE the no-feed ordinance and tell Fish and Game to STAND DOWN. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 47 of 60 Page 44 of 46 McCall has ALWAYS been a sanctuary for humans and wildlife alike. Please do not “City-fi” and pave over and alter forever the last vestiges of this beautiful MOUNTAIN town. Once it’s gone, once the deer are gone, this magic, this beauty is GONE FOREVER. I urge you to VOTE NO today and make the City step back and re-evaluate what they are considering BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE. We NEED to preserve McCall. The deer BELONG TO ALL OF US." 332 6/24/21 13:54:02 Shannon Reeves 20 Timberline Dr Against I am against this decision. 333 6/24/21 13:53:40 melswfstage@ sbcglobal.net Melinda Pereira Against Save the deer and other wildlife in McCall, Idaho. 334 6/24/21 13:48:51 Teresa Daily 22912 Cirrus View Court, Caldwell, ID Against McCall is situated in the mountains which is the original habitat of wildlife. As we grow we continue to encroach on their habitat and we are now sharing our spaces. How can we terminate innocent animals because we humans are in their space, if we're going to live in their environment then we need to be prepared to share the space. If you don't want to share the space then you should go somewhere else, the animals were here first. 335 6/24/21 13:58:29 Dianne Ryan 601 River Street, McCall, Idaho Against Please don't harm the deer... We need to drive slower, and be more tolerant. Thank you. 336 6/24/21 13:51:31 Heidi Baumgartner heidijbb@yahoo.com Against "As an Idaho Native it is absolutely amazing that we are even having to make a stance against issues like this. The McCall area is a place I have always chose to go to for the nature and beauty and along with that comes the wildlife. This is their home and was their home before the PEOPLE from all over (mostly those coming from outside of Idaho) moved in and are now pushing for things like the eradication of the deer. And let me say, this is only the beginning. Leave them alone! We should be pushing to save them not get rid of them. This is IDAHO- let's remind each other of that. Start doing things like this you will only continue to make people angry, and that is one more thing we DON'T need right now. Have a heart and do the right thing. HB" 337 6/24/21 14:10:05 Hali James 146 Trail Loop Dr #201 Paducah, Kentucky Against I am against the relocating of deer and other wildlife that grace beautiful McCall Idaho. Listen to the voice of the people. 338 6/24/21 14:06:03 Jim and Debra Staup P.O. Box 1221 McCall, ID 83638 Against So much of this is wrong.. Time to TABLE the Decision !!! There are more humane options. If you pass the ordinance, you know the Council will take a lot of heat regardless of what you may think. This issue has not been well thought out; the consequences will bite our community badly. Take the time to do this correctly and humanely. This is a human caused issue; the deer shouldn't be harmed or killed because of us. Once again, TABLE this decision!!! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 48 of 60 Page 45 of 46 339 6/24/21 14:16:48 Tracy Hunter 4026 N Newland Loop, Lehi, Utah 84043 Against Deer do not need to be relocated. THEY WERE HERE BEFORE US. WE INVADED THEIR HOME, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. The deer belong in the forests, McCall, and we the people are the visitors! 340 6/24/21 14:28:22 Kaitlin Parsons 325 Valley Springs Road Apt D-206 Against The wildlife in McCall is one of the best parts of living here. Destroying that would be a huge disservice to the community 341 6/24/21 14:27:41 Jennifer Wahlquist 129 Sue Dr McCall, ID For I am for the relocation and management of the local wildlife under the supervision and direction of Idaho’s Fish and Game. 342 6/24/21 14:31:21 Kay Ernst P O Box 117 Vale OR 97918 Against For 18 years our family worked at Camp Pittenger for family work week ends. It was always a treat to see the wildlife in and around McCall. It was THEIR home before we moved in! I don't get to McCall as often now, but when I do, I expect to see the wildlife. I think it is terrible what is being planned to happen to these beautiful creatures of God. Please reconsider and allow them for future generations to enjoy. Thank you 343 6/24/21 14:30:25 Julie Hellerman 212 n 3rd #4 Against I enjoy our town deer and do not feel they are a nuisance . They bring a peace and beauty to our town. Most people enjoy the moments our wildlife brings toMcCall, with wilderness comes wildlife. Please preserve what our community enjoys. Thank you for all you do for our community. 344 6/24/21 14:34:08 Thomas Sowers 261 Buckcamp Rd, McCall ID Against Please let the deer do what they do. There is no reason for further regulation. The deer are not hurting anyone, if you hit one with your car you were probably driving too fast, texting, or intoxicated. If people are feeding them, that should be their business. Spend your time reading the Constitution of the United States. Liberty and Freedom. 345 6/24/21 14:29:07 Nikki Nakan Nikki Nakano I live in town and am a full-time employee of the golf course . I truly feel the deer are a fabric of the McCall environment and do feel they are a true asset, not a nuisance to our environment. Against I love our town deer. With wilderness comes wildlife! Please preserve what all enjoy . Thanks for all that you do for our town! 346 6/24/21 14:36:25 Heather ODonnell 8480 W. Cory Court, Boise, ID 83704 Against Are you people crazy? Leave the wildlife alone. Move if they are a nuisance to you. 347 6/24/21 14:35:43 Nadina Zarkowski 709 Bridle Path Way, McCall, ID 83638 For I support what ever measures it takes to control and decrease the town deer population. I also support the ordinance that forbids the feeding of wildlife. 348 6/24/21 14:38:50 Heather ODonnell 8480 W. Cory Court, Boise ID 83704 Against Are you people crazy? Leave the wildlife alone. Move if they are a nuisance to you. 349 6/24/21 14:46:07 Lori Crogh 13147 Hill House Loop, Box 634 Donnelly ID 83615 Against We live in these mountains to enjoy the beauty and the beasts. To take away one, will leave the other without it's mate. For who are we to decide what is beauty and what is beast? Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 49 of 60 Page 46 of 46 350 6/24/21 14:37:33 Ashlee Enbysk 6701 Ashland dr Boise ID 83709 Against This is a terrible idea 351 6/24/21 14:50:36 Melissa Dibbe 25153 Shirley Ln Middleton, ID 83644 Against Our family visit McCall multiple times a year and our favorite part is seeing all the new wildlife, especially the deer. There are many reasons this is wrong but please dont do this. What makes this town so beautiful is the natural elements. One year we ate at sushi and the deer were 20 feet away grazing. Or we love when they come up to our cabin to say hi and sleep under the trees at night allowing us to wake up to them just being there. Those memories are a part of the McCall Charm. Don't let anyone take that away. Thank you! 352 6/24/21 14:55:45 Aldana Kay Enbysk 6701 Ashland Dr Boise id 83709 Against Crazy! Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 50 of 60 To the City Manager, the Mayor, the City Council, and the other public representatives attending tonight, I appreciate the opportunity to have my comment read by all of you for tonight‘s meeting. Though this is an issue about wildlife management within the city limits, it would seem there is more to it than that. I believe it is imperative for the community and those who represent it to communicate respectfully with one another to ensure that all members feel heard, seen, and understood. There is a lot to be learned from our mix of educational and experiential backgrounds. Context really is everything. Over the years growing up here I have witnessed the relationship between public officials and our community erode and repair itself many times. Hopefully, this will be a productive and thoughtful process during which trust in our public entities will be encouraged as opposed to a night in which a band aid is slapped on the issue and the relationship further eroded. We live in a rural, mountain community no matter how much it may feel otherwise this time of year. Wildlife in our community is inevitable. All of the wildlife issues we are experiencing currently and in the future have not been branded appropriately, these are human issues, not wildlife ones. We have altered the routes, the food supply, and more for these animals and we need to take accountability for our actions. This may include actions such as engagement and education for locals and tourists alike, citing individuals and businesses for feeding wildlife, citing people for not driving responsibly (too fast or impeding traffic to take a photo). I understand all of this would take resources that may be hard to come by, but education and prevention prove to be more impactful and cost effective in the long run (I say this an economist by training). Not all of us in this community are cevidologists or have a degree in the study of cervids, let alone biology, but I would hope we all are people who enjoy and respect nature. I also believe people want to do good, so it rests on the shoulders of those at the table tonight to provide the opportunity for our community members to learn how to be better. This is not an isolated incident or issue, we do not need to reinvent the wheel. The precedent has already been set and the burden of proof well established by communities and other Fish & Game districts across the continent. If communities like ours all over North America can co-exist then so can we. I implore the council to either establish a community action committee or to table the issue for another time. There are plenty of issues at the forefront and as the deer haven’t gone anywhere for over a hundred years, they can probably wait a few more weeks. Always, Angela Staup Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 51 of 60 Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 52 of 60 From:Anette Spickard To:BessieJo Wagner; Justin Williams Subject:Fwd: Town Deer Letter Date:Thursday, June 24, 2021 1:30:19 PM From: Debra Staup <ikaria@icloud.com> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021, 1:15 PM To: Anette Spickard Subject: Town Deer Letter CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. June 24, 2021 To the City Manager and City Council, I am not able to attend the meeting tonight due to a previous obligation. Yet, I still feel the need to followup on my stance regarding the deer in town. I hope you took the time to read my letter I sent for the last meeting. Before I go any further, I need to express my disappointment in the Police Chief's unprofessional comment about 'Armchair biologists'. It was an uncalled for remark directed at those of us who wrote and or expressed our concerns. Whereas, I may not have a specific degree in biology, I am well educated, a long time resident, a taxpayer, and a voter who took the time to respectfully write a letter to the Council about my concerns. Before I wrote my letter, I researched what other states do with their local deer. Every site I went to was a State Fish and Game site and their Wildlife Management Plan. I found out a lot of information; some of which I felt would be worth considering for our area. I believe if I am going to write my opposition about something, I should also offer up other ideas, options, solutions, or plans. Taking the time to research other strategies from legitimate Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 53 of 60 resources, other 'experts' in the field, and sites are exactly what any person or entity should do before making an important decision. I was not impressed by his comment; this was a public meeting. Remarks and comments should be kept respectful regardless of where we stand on an issue. Back to the subject at hand. I am not going to rewrite my whole letter again as I am hoping you read it when I had sent it a couple of weeks ago. I realize the Council and City Manager are in a difficult position regarding our town deer. I respect your hard work at trying to find the best solution without inflaming the public. I have heard if you do pass a no feeding ordinance, then our F&G will start the process of trapping, removing/relocating, or killing the deer this winter regardless of what others think or want. It troubles me to hear this as I still feel, according to my research, that we should try other options before going this route. I know you say what F&G does has nothing to do with you. I get what you are trying to say, yet I believe the backlash will still come your way. This issue and decision are causing anger in the community. I have no idea what you will decide tonight. I would like to believe rational and reasonable thinking will prevail. I suggest this decision be tabled to give everyone a chance time to navigate this situation better. While it is tabled, we could still move ahead in educating the public about the 'dos and don'ts' etc. regarding the deer/wildlife. A community/council advisory committee could be formed to help guide the process along. I believe if we slow down, look at the successes of other communities, open our minds to making a plan where common ground can be found, we may come out of this with a win for the community and the deer. It is certainly worth a try in my opinion. Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 54 of 60 Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Debra Staup Retired Educator Sent from my iPad Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 55 of 60 Page 1 of 5 BEND, OREGON: Wildlife / Deer: Wildlife in the state of Oregon falls under the control of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (this includes skunks and raccoons). The Bend Police Department will respond to emergency wildlife calls that pose a danger to the public. Some examples of this would be motor vehicle accidents involving a deer that is unable to walk or a deer entangled in fencing. The Department does not respond to injured deer that are able to stand and walk. Unfortunately, deer walking with broken or missing legs are common in the city limits due to deer having encounters with traffic. During the spring, it is common to find unattended new born fawns inside the city limits. It is common for female deer to leave the newborn fawns for up to 24hrs unattended while the female deer feeds. It is important to leave the fawn where you find it, and do not move or handle the fawn. Female deer are very protective of fawns, and have been known to attack people and/or dogs when they feel their fawn is threatened. If the fawn is located in a dangerous place such as the middle of a street, or the front door of a business, please contact the Bend Police Department or the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife for further assistance at 541-693-6911. ODFW Living with Wildlife (state.or.us) Animal Control | City of Bend (bendoregon.gov) ODFW Living with Wildlife - Deer and Elk (state.or.us) Don't_Feed_Deer_and_elk.pdf (state.or.us) ODFW does feed deer and elk at several wildlife areas during the winter, to keep them off adjacent agricultural lands where they damage crops. These feeding programs are long-term commitments that require significant financial and staffing resources. Feeding starts early in the season so deer and elk’s digestive systems do not have to quickly readjust to new food types, and continues every day, no matter what, until forage conditions improve. Feeding areas are located away from human-populated areas to decrease conflicts. ODFW also conducts disease testing at some feeding sites Elk_Damage_Flyer.pdf (state.or.us) deerelkfences.pdf (state.or.us) STATE OF WASHINGTON: Living with wildlife | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 56 of 60 Page 2 of 5 What the DWR does (utah.gov) Ungulate feeding brochure (3).pdf Winter wildlife feeding | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Fact Sheet 09: Urban Mule Deer Issues – WAFWA https://wafwa.org/wpdm-package/fact-sheet-9-urban-mule-deer- issues/?ind=1598462089993&filename=MDWG Fact Sheet 9 Urban Issues.pdf&wpdmdl=5609&refresh=60c13ca683d611623276710 Fact Sheet 02: Understanding Mule Deer and Winter Feeding – WAFWA https://wafwa.org/wpdm-package/fact-sheet-2-winter- feeding/?ind=1598461089273&filename=1598461088wpdm_MDWG Fact Sheet 2 Winter Feeding.pdf&wpdmdl=5599&refresh=60c13ccb209771623276747 mdwg-32_historical_and_current_md_abundance_web.pdf (utah.gov) Ungulate feeding brochure (3).pdf FROM TOM MOATS AND BIOLOGIST ERIC: Also find attached a new brochure that we’ve developed to try to stem deer feeding. Not sure if this is “officially” endorsed yet and I don’t think any are printed .. .but I think it’s really good so feel free to borrow from it. As to why eradication isn’t good I guess I’d just say that this isn’t a good choice because plenty of people no doubt really like the deer and they “belong” to everybody. Of course outside of urban settings they play important simultaneous ecosystem roles of herbivore and prey. Maybe another straightforward reason in opposition to eradication is that it would be expensive and its very likely that deer would just move back into the places that they were removed from. For some more background . . . .some cities have implemented capture and remove programs. These tend to be expensive, not particularly effective and the relocated deer don’t tend to have a great survival rate. Thayne worked for a while on a project like this in Utah. Hope this helps, Eric Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 57 of 60 Page 3 of 5 STATE OF UTAH: SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources has made the decision to discontinue the translocation of urban deer (removing deer from urban areas and relocating them to rangelands). 50% SURVIVAL RATES FOR RELOCATED DEER A recent DWR study tracked the deer that were removed from urban areas and relocated. It found that about half of the deer did not survive after being relocated. After weighing the benefits and risks associated with the non-lethal removal option, the DWR has made the decision to discontinue the translocation part of the urban deer program. Research also showed that the translocation efforts didn't significantly change public feedback regarding conflicts with urban deer. DWR discontinues translocation in urban deer program (utah.gov) What the DWR does (utah.gov) Fact Sheet 2: Understanding Mule Deer And Winter Feeding (utah.gov) In some situations, it may be necessary to feed deer to sustain a base population (WAFWA 2003). If necessary, winter feeding of mule deer in Utah will be guided by the winter feeding policy (UDWR 2011b). In 2017, the Division founded the Utah Wildlife Migration Initiative to document, preserve, and enhance wildlife movement throughout Utah. This initiative uses state-of-the-art GPS tracking technology to monitor the movements of species in near real-time. Information generated by tracking collars is used to define critical habitats for species, including migration corridors. Currently, the Migration Initiative is putting a large focus on documenting mule deer movements. For example, in 2019 there were over 900 mule deer with GPS tracking collars in 15 wildlife management units throughout the state (Figure 7). GPS tracking information allows the Division to precisely define migration corridors for mule deer (Figure 8). The Division uses the information to work with partners to place wildlife crossings on roads, which preserves wildlife movement and reduces deer-vehicle collisions. The information is also used to work with landowners and municipalities to preserve open space for deer and other wildlife to move across the landscape. Additionally, the information is used to target habitat treatment locations and evaluate the success of habitat improvements Utah Mule Deer Statewide Management Plan, 2019–24 Unit deer management plants (utah.gov) Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 58 of 60 Page 4 of 5 Is supplemental winter feeding ever warranted? A DWR conservation officer pours food into a trough as part of an emergency feeding situation in northern Utah. Yes, there are sometimes specific emergency situations when supplemental feeding is beneficial. For example, deer herds in critical wintering areas that are caught in unusually deep and long-lasting snow might benefit from winter feeding. When the DWR considers supplemental feeding, biologists carefully analyze whether the benefits will outweigh the disadvantages. If a decision is made by the agency to proceed, resources are allocated, special food mixtures are determined and the feeding takes place in an organized, targeted and strategic way that maximizes the benefits to the deer while minimizing the possible adverse consequences. DWR biologists strongly advise against private individuals and organizations feeding deer. Well-intentioned private feeding endeavors almost always create more problems than they solve. Instead of helping, this kind of feeding can result in higher deer mortality rates and long-term adverse consequences for the herd. It can be tough on a caring public to avoid the quick fix that deer feeding can offer. People must understand that deer are wild animals and not livestock. Despite the best intentions, winter feeding is usually a last resort and not in the best interest of deer. Minimizing browsing damage by deer (utah.gov) Minimizing browsing damage by deer (utah.gov) Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 59 of 60 Page 5 of 5 Search results (utah.gov) DWR discontinues translocation in urban deer program (utah.gov) What the DWR does (utah.gov) mdwg-32_historical_and_current_md_abundance_web.pdf (utah.gov) DWR discontinues translocation in urban deer program (utah.gov) Wildlife Feeding Ordinance Comments Page 60 of 60