Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutSelect Board Meeting Packet - 12.05.22Select Board David Whitney Chair Edward Chatelain Vice Chair Kari Hoffmann Clerk Mary Chaffee Cynthia Bingham Town Administrator Peter Lombardi Assistant Town Administrator Donna Kalinick Project Manager Conor Kenny Executive Assistant Erika Mawn Town of Brewster Select Board 2198 Main St., Brewster, MA 02631 townadmin@brewster-ma.gov (508) 896-3701 SELECT BOARD MEETING AGENDA Remote Participation Only December 5, 2022 at 5:00 PM Pursuant to Chapter 107 of the Acts of 2022, this meeting will be conducted in person and via remote means, in accordance with applicable law. This means that members of the public body may access this meeting in person, or via virtual means. In person attendance will be at the meeting location listed above, and it is possible that any or all members of the public body may attend remotely. No in -person attendance of members of the public will be permitted, and public participation in any public hearing conducted during this meeting shall be by remote means only. Members of the public who wish to access the meeting may do so in the following manner: Phone: Call (312) 626 6799 or (301) 715-8592. Webinar ID:890 9291 0526 Passcode: 509224 To request to speak: Press *9 and wait to be recognized. ZoomWebinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j /89092910526?pwd=WHM2V3hrVklhSTIoWWhVU09kanUzOT09 Passcode: 509224 To request to speak: Tap Zoom "Raise Hand", then wait to be recognized. When required by law or allowed by the Chair, persons wishing to provide public comment or otherwise participate in the meeting, may do so by accessing the meeting remotely, as noted above. Additionally, the meeting will be broadcast live, in real time, via Live broadcast (Brewster Government TV Channel 18), Livestream (Iivestream.brewster- ma.gov), or Video recording (tv.brewster-ma.gov). 1. Call to Order 2. Declaration of a Quorum 3. Meeting Participation Statement 4. - Recording Statement 5. Executive Session • Review & Vote on Executive Session Minutes • To discuss strategy with respect to litigation as an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the Town, Bott vs. Brewster 6:00 PM: Anticipated Start Time of Open Session 6. Public Announcements and Comment: Members of the public may address the Select Board on matters not on the meeting's agenda for a maximum 3-5 minutes at the Chair's discretion. Under the Open Meeting Law, the Select Board is unable to reply but may add items presented to a future agenda. 7. Select Board Announcements and Liaison Reports 8. Town Administrator's Report 9. Consent Agenda a. Meeting Minutes: November 7 and November 14, 2022 b. Execute Warrant for January 10, 2023 Special Town Election c. Request from Zoning Board of Appeals to Hold a Meeting on January 10th d. Request for Facility Use: Brewster Conservation Trust e. Request from Verizon for Equipment Modification to Facility at Cell Tower Site: 1657 Main Street f. Committee Appointment: Cultural Council, Jan Crocker g. Request to Utilize Town Equipment: Homeless for Holidays (Brewster Fire/Rescue Association) h. One Day Liquor License Applications: Cape Rep Theatre 10. 6:15pm Public Hearing - Renew Annual Liquor Licenses: Apt Cape Cod, Brewster Fish House, Brewster Pizza House, Island Blue Crab Food & Spirits, Laurino's Cape Cod Village, Stone L'Oven Pizza, Woodshed, Ack Gioia, Freeman's Grill, Linx Tavern, Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center, Brewster Post #9917 VFW, Chillingsworth, Old Sea Pines Inn, Spinnaker, Brewster Farms Quick Pic, Brewster Village Marketplace, Brewster Wines & Spirits, Winslow Spirits & Things, Luke's Super Liquors, Millstone Liquors, Ferretti's Market, Ocean Edge Resorts 11. Discuss and Vote to Renew Annual Common Victualler, Innholder, Lodging House, New and/or Used Car Dealers, Hawker Peddler & Livery Licenses .34 EIDEfl Bq6 9 �i n Select Board David Whitney Chair Edward Chatelain Vice Chair Kari Hoffmann Clerk Mary Chaffee Cynthia Bingham Town Administrator Peter Lombardi Assistant Town Administrator Donna Kalinick Project Manager Conor Kenny Executive Assistant Erika Mawn 12. Presentation and Discussion on Nauset Regional High School Project & Upcoming Special Elections (Joint Meeting with Finance Committee) - Brooke Clenchy, Nauset Superintendent & Chris Easley, Nauset Regional School Committee Chair 13. Update on Stony Brook Elementary School HVAC Feasibility Study and Discuss Potential Next Steps 14. Discuss and Vote on Updated Memorandum of Understanding Between Cape Light Compact and Town of Brewster Regarding Energy Manager Position - Select Board FY23-24 Strategic Plan Goal CA -1 15. Discuss and Vote to Disband Energy Committee & Create New Energy & Climate Action Committee - Select Board FY23-24 Strategic Plan Goal CA -1 16. Debrief on Fall 2022 Special Town Meeting and Discuss Potential Next Steps for Vision Planning Committee and Drummer Boy Park Phase I Design 17. s 18. Matters Not Reasonably Anticipated by the Chair 19. Questions from the Media 20. Next Meetings: December 12 (Joint with Finance Committee), December 19, 2022, January 9, January 11 (Joint with Finance Committee re. 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan) and January 23, 2023 21. Adjournment Date Posted: 12/01/2022 Date Revised: Received by Town Clerk: '72 DEr _ 3421,11 BREWSTER TOki}i CLERK CHARLES D. BAKER Governor KARYN E. POLITO Lt. Governor The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel: (617) 727-7775 TTY Tel: (617) 727-6618 Fax: (617) 727-4764 www.mass.gov/eopss TERRENCE M. REIDY Secretary September 29, 2022 Capt. Anthony Dalmau Brewster Fire Department 1671 Main St. Brewster, MA 02631 Dear Capt. Dalmau: Your outstanding performance as a member of the Brewster Fire Department has been brought to the attention of the Firefighter of the Year Heroic Awards Committee by your superiors. I am pleased to express my thanks for your selfless service. The Committee commends the outstanding conduct that led to your nomination for a prestigious “Firefighter of the Year” award. Although it is not possible to include each nominee in the annual ceremony, we thank you for your invaluable work on behalf of the residents of Brewster Fire Department and the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Your work shows that you are an exceptional and devoted member of the fire safety community. Sincerely, Terrence M. Reidy Secretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security CHARLES D. BAKER Governor KARYN E. POLITO Lt. Governor The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel: (617) 727-7775 TTY Tel: (617) 727-6618 Fax: (617) 727-4764 www.mass.gov/eopss TERRENCE M. REIDY Secretary September 29, 2022 Chief Robert Moran Brewster Fire Department 1671 Main St. Brewster, MA 02631 Dear Chief Robert Moran: Your outstanding performance as a member of the Brewster Fire Department has been brought to the attention of the Firefighter of the Year Heroic Awards Committee by your superiors. I am pleased to express my thanks for your selfless service. The Committee commends the outstanding conduct that led to your nomination for a prestigious “Firefighter of the Year” award. Although it is not possible to include each nominee in the annual ceremony, we thank you for your invaluable work on behalf of the residents of Brewster Fire Department and the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Your work shows that you are an exceptional and devoted member of the fire safety community. Sincerely, Terrence M. Reidy Secretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security CHARLES D. BAKER Governor KARYN E. POLITO Lt. Governor The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel: (617) 727-7775 TTY Tel: (617) 727-6618 Fax: (617) 727-4764 www.mass.gov/eopss TERRENCE M. REIDY Secretary September 29, 2022 Capt. Daniel Kimball Brewster Fire Department 1671 Main St. Brewster, MA 02631 Dear Capt. Kimball: Your outstanding performance as a member of the Brewster Fire Department has been brought to the attention of the Firefighter of the Year Heroic Awards Committee by your superiors. I am pleased to express my thanks for your selfless service. The Committee commends the outstanding conduct that led to your nomination for a prestigious “Firefighter of the Year” award. Although it is not possible to include each nominee in the annual cere mony, we thank you for your invaluable work on behalf of the residents of Brewster Fire Department and the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Your work shows that you are an exceptional and devoted member of the fire safety community. Sincerely, Terrence M. Reidy Secretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security CHARLES D. BAKER Governor KARYN E. POLITO Lt. Governor The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel: (617) 727-7775 TTY Tel: (617) 727-6618 Fax: (617) 727-4764 www.mass.gov/eopss TERRENCE M. REIDY Secretary September 29, 2022 Capt. Chad Foakes Brewster Fire Department 1671 Main St. Brewster, MA 02631 Dear Capt. Foakes: Your outstanding performance as a member of the Brewster Fire Department has been brought to the attention of the Firefighter of the Year Heroic Awards Committee by your sup eriors. I am pleased to express my thanks for your selfless service. The Committee commends the outstanding conduct that led to your nomination for a prestigious “Firefighter of the Year” award. Although it is not possible to include each nominee in th e annual ceremony, we thank you for your invaluable work on behalf of the residents of Brewster Fire Department and the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Your work shows that you are an exceptional and devoted member of the fire safety community. Sincerely, Terrence M. Reidy Secretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security CHARLES D. BAKER Governor KARYN E. POLITO Lt. Governor The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel: (617) 727-7775 TTY Tel: (617) 727-6618 Fax: (617) 727-4764 www.mass.gov/eopss TERRENCE M. REIDY Secretary September 29, 2022 FF Matthew Levasseur Brewster Fire Department 1671 Main St. Brewster, MA 02631 Dear FF Levasseur: Your outstanding performance as a member of the Brewster Fire Department has been brought to the attention of the Firefighter of the Year Heroic Awards Committee by your superiors. I am pleased to express my thanks for your selfless service. The Committee commends the outstanding conduct that led to your nomination for a prestigious “Firefighter of the Year” award. Although it is not possible to include each nominee in the annual ceremony, we thank you for your invaluable work on behalf of the residents of Brewster Fire Department and the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Your work shows that you are an exceptional and devoted member of the fire safety community. Sincerely, Terrence M. Reidy Secretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security CHARLES D. BAKER Governor KARYN E. POLITO Lt. Governor The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel: (617) 727-7775 TTY Tel: (617) 727-6618 Fax: (617) 727-4764 www.mass.gov/eopss TERRENCE M. REIDY Secretary September 29, 2022 FF Matthew Morthland Brewster Fire Department 1671 Main St. Brewster, MA 02631 Dear FF Morthland: Your outstanding performance as a member of the Brewster Fire Department has been brought to the attention of the Firefighter of the Year Heroic Awards Com mittee by your superiors. I am pleased to express my thanks for your selfless service. The Committee commends the outstanding conduct that led to your nomination for a prestigious “Firefighter of the Year” award. Although it is not possible to include each nominee in the annual ceremony, we thank you for your invaluable work on behalf of the residents of Brewster Fire Department and the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Your work shows that you are an exceptional and devoted member of the fire safety community. Sincerely, Terrence M. Reidy Secretary, Executive Office of Public Safety and Security November 15, 2022 Dear Mr. Peter Lombardi, Congratulations! I am pleased to notify you that the Town of Brewster has been awarded a Sustainable Materials Recovery Program grant in the amount of $10,800. I want to thank you for your commitment to reducing waste and increasing recycling for the benefit of our communities and the environment. Enclosed you will find further instructions from the Department of Environmental Protection on next steps. Please feel free to contact Janine Bishop at Janine.Bishop@mass.gov if you have any questions. Governor Charles D. Baker Lt. Governor Karyn E. Polito Charles D. Baker Governor Karyn E. Polito Lieutenant Governor Bethany A. Card Secretary Martin Suuberg Commissioner This information is available in alternate format. Contact Glynis Bugg at 617-348-4040. TTY# MassRelay Service 1-800-439-2370 MassDEP Website: www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper November 15, 2022 Mr. Peter Lombardi Town Administrator Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 Dear Mr. Lombardi, Congratulations! It is my pleasure to inform you that the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) has awarded the Town of Brewster Recycling Dividends Program funds under the Sustainable Materials Recovery Program. The Town of Brewster has earned 18 points and will receive $10,800. The Sustainable Materials Recovery Program (SMRP) was created under 310 CMR 19.300-303 and the Green Communities Act, which directs a portion of the proceeds from the sale of Waste Energy Certificates to recycling programs approved by MassDEP. We are awarding over $4.2 million in SMRP funding to 270 municipalities and regional groups in this round of funding. Recycling programs play a vital role in limiting our dependence on landfills and incinerators, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and supporting economic activity in the Commonwealth. Recycling Dividend Program (RDP) funds foster investment in local programs including recycling equipment, organics diversion, outreach and education, pilot programs, school recycling, toxics reduction and more. Please refer to the RDP Approved Expenses List for more information. MassDEP has invested in developing nationally recognized tools to assist municipalities with reducing recycling contamination and improving public awareness of smart recycling practices. We encourage you to utilize the Recycling IQ Kit and Recycle Smart MA website and to consult with your MassDEP Municipal Assistance Coordinator for assistance in implementing these best practices. To accept your grant award, please sign and return the attached RDP Contract via email before January 15, 2023. After we receive your signed RDP contract, funds will be sent to your community. See the enclosed checklist for further instructions related to your RDP grant. Should you have any questions, please email Janine Bishop at Janine.Bishop@mass.gov. Thank you for your continued commitment to recycling and waste reduction in Massachusetts. Sincerely, Martin Suuberg Commissioner cc: Griffin Ryder, DPW Director MIIA Grant Statement $9,741.77Grand Total:$8,941.77 Grant ID Requested Amt Awarded AmtStatusCategory Brewster Department Purpose RM 111 $5,960.67 $5,960.67YesProperty Loss Prevention Equipment: flammable storage cabinets, flammable rag disposal containers, grated ceiling vents, lightning mitigation, moisture meters, low and high (in IT rooms) temperature alarms, sprinkler cages, etc.# Town Administration Wireless Pressure and Temperature Monitor for Dry Barrel Hydrants - 6'0" Clow Medallion iHydrants RM 111 $2,981.10 $2,981.10YesBack Up CamerasTown Administration Automotive Camera System Cameras - Rear View Camera Kit: CMOS, 120 Degree Viewing Angle, 800 x 480 Pixeles, 69k RM 111 $800.00 $0.00NoSlip resistant mats/Anti-fatigue matsTown Administration (5) Hog Heaven Industrial-Grade Anti-Fatigue Mat, OSHA Yellow Striped Border, Welding Safe, Slip Resistant, Grease/Oil Proof, Ergonomic 7/8-inch Mat (Black, 3' x 5') (424-2-5F 3F) November 15, 2022 Town of Brewster ATTN: Chris Miller 1657 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 508-896-4546 cmiller@brewster-ma.gov Dear Chris Miller: Congratulations! I am pleased to notify you that the Town of Brewster has been awarded a grant in the amount of $200,000 towards the Freemans Pond Restoration Project. Thank you for your commitment to development of this project and to ecological restoration. Through this funding, and your continued support, we hope to advance our mission to restore rivers, wetlands, and watersheds for the benefit of people, fish, and wildlife throughout the Commonwealth. You will be receiving further instructions from the Department of Fish and Game, Division of Ecological Restoration on next steps. Please feel free to contact David Gallagher, DER’s Finance Manager at David.Gallagher2@mass.gov if you have any questions. Sincerely, Governor Charles D. Baker Lt. Governor Karyn E. Polito 617.556.0007 | 1.800.548.3522 | www.k-plaw.com | ©2022 KP Law, P.C. An Act Relative To Equity In The Cannabis Industry Marijuana Reform September 6, 2022 The legalization of medical and recreational marijuana in Massachusetts raises many significant legal issues for municipalities as they navigate the permitting for and licensing of this fairly new industry. Many Massachusetts municipalities have engaged in extensive host community agreement negotiations to address both direct and indirect impacts within their communities. After much negotiation at the state level, the General Court recently enacted “An Act Relative to Equity in the Cannabis Industry” (the “Act”), which was signed by Governor Baker on August 11, 2022. The Act makes numerous changes to Massachusetts’ marijuana laws, including those governing host community agreements ("HCAs”), community impact fees, so-called “social consumption” establishments,” also referred to as marijuana cafes, taxation, and the role of the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (the “CCC”). This is the first in a two-part series exploring these extensive amendments. This memorandum provides an overview of changes made to the law concerning HCAs and community impact fees; we will address separately the issues of social consumption and social equity businesses. HOST COMMUNITY AGREEMENTS The Act substantially revises the regulatory oversight for and approval of HCAs, limits municipalities’ ability to collect impact fees for anticipated costs, establishes penalties for municipalities that fail to, or improperly, document impact costs, prohibits an HCA from imposing other types of monetary commitments beyond community impact fees, and establishes a mechanism by which municipalities may waive the HCA requirement entirely. Impact Fees - While the Act does not eliminate the concept of a community impact fee, it does impose new and different requirements on host communities. The Act identifies the following requirements applicable to the calculation of impact fees: 1. Fee must be reasonably related to the costs imposed upon the municipality in the preceding year by the operation of the marijuana business, as documented; 2. Fee must be based on actual costs, rather than as a percentage of total or gross sales; 3. Fee may amount to not more than three percent (3%) of the gross sales of the marijuana business; 4. Fee can be effective for no longer than the eighth (8th) year of operation of the marijuana business; 617.556.0007 | 1.800.548.3522 | www.k-plaw.com | ©2022 KP Law, P.C. 5. Fee commences on the date the marijuana business is granted a final license by the CCC, with payment due annually to the host community; 6. Fee must be documented and transmitted by the host community to the marijuana business not later than one (1) month after the marijuana business’ license is renewed by the CCC; and 7. Fee must encompass all payments and obligations between the host community and the marijuana business. The significance of these changes is that a community impact fee cannot, without being at risk for a challenge, be calculated with regard to what a municipality predicts to be the costs of impacts but must instead be based on actual documented expenditures in the prior year. Further, the Act prohibits an HCA from providing for any other kind of financial commitment to a municipality or a non-profit as directed by the municipality and renders unenforceable “[a]ny other contractual financial obligation that is explicitly or implicitly considered in, or is a condition of a host community agreement.” Breach of Contract Claim, Damages, Attorneys Fees – The Act also creates a breach of contract claim, to be brought in Court, to allow a licensed marijuana business to challenge a municipality’s documentation of costs for purposes of calculating the community impact fee. If the marijuana business prevails on the claim that a host community’s documented costs are not “reasonably related to the actual costs” imposed by its operation in the preceding year, the violation may be punishable by the award of damages attorneys’ fees and other costs encompassed in the community impact fee. This is a significant remedy and likely imposes a high burden on municipalities to (1) contemporaneously document the process used to track expenditure-related matters that can be characterized as community impact fees, and (2) fund any anticipated impacts for the upcoming fiscal year, with the hope of being reimbursed through the community impact fee process after the end of that fiscal year. Minimum Standards for Addressing Opportunity for those Disproportionately Harmed – By July 1, 2023, potential host communities must adopt procedures and policies that establish minimum standards for facilitating opportunity in the industry for those disproportionately harmed by marijuana prohibition before entering into an HCA with a marijuana business. Failure to adopt such procedures creates a significant risk for the host community, as the Act provides that such a community may be required to forfeit a monetary amount equal to the annual total of community impact fees received from all marijuana businesses operating within the host community. Further, the failure of any host community to abide by the regulations concerning such minimum acceptable standards, once promulgated by the CCC, may also result in forfeiture. Role of the CCC – The Act provides the CCC with enhanced authority concerning HCAs. The CCC has jurisdiction to “review, regulate, enforce and approve” HCAs as part of a completed marijuana business license application and at each license renewal. The Act directs the CCC to promulgate rules and regulations applicable to the negotiation and approval of HCAs, with a focus on encouraging host communities to work with social equity businesses and economic empowerment priority applicants, as well as to prepare a model HCA. While the Act makes significant changes to existing law regulating municipalities and marijuana businesses, the effect of the Act on the status of pre-existing HCAs is still not entirely clear and will likely require specific review 617.556.0007 | 1.800.548.3522 | www.k-plaw.com | ©2022 KP Law, P.C. on a case-by-case basis. Communities may have already begun receiving request to amend existing HCAs in light of the aforementioned legislative amendments. We will continue to work with municipalities to negotiate appropriate HCAs and HCA amendments based on, among other things, each municipality’s unique physical characteristics, demographics, and guidance provided by the CCC. We are closely monitoring developments in this changing area of the law, particularly as the CCC proposes, and then formally promulgates regulations, procedures, and policies, and will provide further updates as we know more. Should you have further questions on this topic, please contact Attorney Nicole Costanzo at ncostanzo@k- plaw.com or 617.556.0007 with further questions on this topic. Disclaimer: This information is provided as a service by KP Law, P.C. This information is general in nature and does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Neither the provision nor receipt of this information creates an attorney-client relationship with KP Law, P.C. Whether to take any action based upon the information contained herein should be determined only after consultation with legal counsel. November 18, 2022 Joan Pernice, President Brewster Ladies' Library Association Peter Lombardi, Town Administrator Town of Brewster Dear Joan and Peter, It has been my great honor to serve as Library Director for the Brewster Ladies' Library since April 2018. The Library Board of Directors, staff, and the Town Administration and town hall staff have all contributed to my tenure in the support the library. It has been a pleasure to work with you all and this community. This letter is my official notification to you that my final day as Director will be Friday March 17, 2023. I understand this date has to be sanctioned by the Barnstable County Retirement Association. I look forward to serving these last few months and will certainly be available to assist the Library Board and Staff with ongoing projects and the transition. Sincerely, Cynthia St. Amour Library Director Select Board Mtg 12.05.2022 1 Agenda Item #9: Consent Agenda Cover Page a.Meeting Minutes: November 7 and November 14, 2022 Draft meeting minutes from the Select Board regular session meeting on November 7th and November 14th, 2022 have been submitted for approval. Administration Recommendation: We recommend the Select Board approve the meeting minutes as presented. b.Execute Warrant for January 10, 2023 Special Town Election The Town Clerk requests the Select Board sign the warrant as is customary. The warrant will then be posted by the Town Constable. Administration Recommendation: We recommend the Select Board vote to approve and sign the January 10, 2023 Special Town Election Warrant. c.Request from Zoning Board of Appeals to Hold a Meeting on January 10, 2023 Zoning Board of Appeals is a public meeting that must not be held on Election Day per M.G.L. c.40A §11 (2004 ed.). The Chair of the ZBA and the administrative assistant has been advised of this law and Town Administration will work on rescheduling their public meeting. Administration Recommendation: We recommend the Select Board follow the Mass. General Law. d.Request for Facility Use: Brewster Conservation Trust The Brewster Conservation Trust would like to host a nature/educational walk at Calf Field Pond Trail, West Gate Road on Sunday January 1, 2023 between 10am and 12pm. They expect 15-20 people to join the walk. The Natural Resources Director reviewed the application and suggested that Brewster Conservation Trust coordinate any parking needs. Brewster Conservation Trust along with the Brewster Natural Resources Department request use of Drummer Boy Park fields to host the annual Brewster Conservation Day on July 8, 2023 with set up on Friday July 7th. The event will be from 8am until 3pm, with educational exhibits and demonstrations for the expected 500-800 guests throughout the day. Department Heads have had the opportunity to review the application and provide feedback which will be shared with the co-hosts of the event. Additionally, the request is to waive the fees associated with this application, which totals $750 ($300 for the Friday set up, $400 for Saturday’s event and $50 for electrical use). Administration Recommendation: We recommend that the Select Board approve these requests. Select Board Mtg 12.05.2022 2 e.Request from Verizon for Equipment Modification to Facility at Cell Tower Site: 1657 Main Street Verizon is requesting permission to perform maintenance activity at their leased premises at 1657 Main Street. Verizon will be removing 3 antennas and 9 RRHs, then installing 3 antennas and 6 RRHs, as well as installing 3 side-by-side antenna mounting brackets. Written consent from the Town of Brewster is required to perform modifications per the ground lease agreement. Administration Recommendation: We recommend that the Board approves this request, pending Verizon obtaining the necessary permits from the Building Department. f.Committee Appointment: Cultural Council, Jan Crocker Jan Crocker has submitted her application and followed the Select Board appointment policy for the vacant member position on the Cultural Council Committee. The Select Board liaison has recommended her appointment. This is for a 3-year term ending June 30, 2025. Administration Recommendation: We recommend the Select Board approve this appointment. g.Request to Utilize Town Equipment: Homeless for Holidays (Brewster Fire/Rescue Association) The Brewster Fire/Rescue Association will be participating in Homeless for the Holidays from December 7th through the 11th. They are requesting Select Board approval for use of the Town’s light tower and sign board to assist in providing lighting, heat, and messaging services during the event. Administration Recommendation: We recommend that the Board approve the use of Town equipment by the Fire/Rescue Association for this purpose. h.One Day Liquor License Applications: Cape Rep Theatre The Cape Rep Theatre located at 3799 has submitted three One Day Liquor License applications with a request to serve beer and wine at three performances in December. They expect 125 guests at each of the following performances: Friday December 9th from 6:30pm – 9:30pm Saturday December 10th from 6:30pm – 9:30pm Sunday December 11th from 1:30pm – 4:30pm The Police Chief, Fire Chief, Town Administration and Health Department have reviewed the applications and there are no concerns. Administration Recommendation: We recommend that the Select Board approve these One Day Liquor License applications. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 1 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator MINUTES OF THE SELECT BOARD MEETING REGULAR SESSION DATE: November 07, 2022 TIME: 5:45 PM PLACE: Remote Participation REMOTE PARTICIPANTS: Chair Whitney, Selectperson Chatelain, Selectperson Bingham, Selectperson Chaffee, Town Administrator Peter Lombardi, Assistant Town Administrator Donna Kalinick, Attorney John Mooradian, Kate Lena, Katie Miller Jacobus, Keith Gauley, Steve Guditus ABSENT: Selectperson Hoffmann Call to Order, Declaration of a Quorum, Meeting Participation Statement and Recording Statement Chair Whitney called the meeting to order at 5:45pm, read the meeting participation and recording statements and declared a quorum by announcing members of the Select Board present. Executive Session: Review & Vote on Executive Session Minutes Selectperson Chatelain moved to enter executive session. Selectperson Chaffee second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Chatelain- yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. The Select Board returned to open session at 5:52pm. Select Board Announcements and Liaison Reports Selectperson Chaffee noted that the Barnstable County Assembly of Delegates passed a resolution on November 2 in opposition to Eversource Energy’s purposed 5-year herbicide spraying plan. The resolution will be submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources. Mr. Lombardi shared that Eversource has extended their public comment period and will be holding a second informational forum in December. The information will be posted on the Town website in the next couple of days. Selectperson Bingham noted the success of the Crosby Haunted Mansion. Consent Agenda a.Meeting Minutes: October 17, 2022 b.Vote to Sign Letter of Support for Administration’s Application to the CPC for Funding of the Housing Coordinator Position c.Execute & Sign Conservation Restriction for Brewster Conservation Trust: 90 Squantum Path d.One Day Liquor License Application: Brewster Sportsman’s Club e.Vote on Comp Time Limits for Seasonal Bylaw Employees: Superintendent of Golf Maintenance Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 2 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Selectperson Chaffee moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Selectperson Bingham second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Chair Whitney- yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Assignment of Articles for November 14, 2022 Special Town Meeting No questions or comments regarding the assignment. Town Administrator’s Report Mr. Lombardi shared an update on the following topics: Citizens Petition, allowing bow hunting in the Punkhorn for 3 weeks o After two extensions, the Attorney General’s Office approved the bylaw. o Department of Natural Resources and Town Administration continues to work with town counsel to practically implement the bylaw in a way that is consistent with the private residences, road and trails and making sure it is consistent with the state statute. o Plan to hold a joint meeting with the Conservation Commission, Select Board, and Water Commissioners on November 22 to make sure all three entities that have care, custody and control over the land have an opportunity to talk through how this will be implemented and to educate residents and hunters in advance of the bow hunting season. Barnstable County spending of ARPA funds o County is proposing to appropriate a little under $13M in County ARPA funds to support a host of regional initiatives related to water quality, wastewater, housing, public health, and broadband. The Towns have received $10M, Brewster’s share is a little under $500K. Cape Cod Bridges o MassDOT continues to plan for replacement of the Bourne and Sagamore bridges and will hold public forums on this project on November 15th & 17th. Details are in the packet. Community Planning Grant-Sea Camps o Town was awarded $75K state grant funding for our planned work to help develop long-term plans for both Sea Camps properties over the next year plus. Reminders: o Election tomorrow, polls will be open from 7am until 8pm at Brewster Baptist Church o Veterans Day Ceremony this Friday November 11th at the Council on Aging on the front lawn if inclement weather it will be held at the Fire Station. o Town Meeting will be held next Monday at 6pm at Stony Brook Elementary School, check in starts at 5pm. The Town held a public forum last Tuesday and developed an informational video on key articles, links to it are available on the Town website homepage. Public Announcements and Comments None Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 3 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Update on Nauset Regional High School Project & Vote on Special Election Warrant for Additional Debt Exclusion Mr. Lombardi shared that the project went out to bid, the general contractor bids were opened about 3 weeks ago. The project costs came in about $30M over budget, the School Building Committee has evaluated several potential different proposals to advance the project. They voted in favor of seeking an additional $38M to support moving forward with the project based on the bids that were submitted. The bids are good for 90 days. Based on the recommendation to the school committee, they voted in favor of holding a district wide election on Tuesday January 10th, this is the same format that the project was previously approved under. The election will be held on the same day in all 4 towns, from 11am – 7pm. There will be a concurrent Town election on the same day and same hours. The school election ballot will be seeking approval of the additional $38.1M and the Town election ballot will seek voter approval to exclude the debt from the levy. Both votes require a simple majority approval of a combined, the additional appropriation will be a combined vote tally in all four towns, the debt exclusion will be separate to each town. More information will be shared with residents, the Select Board, and the Finance Committee about the latest developments in advance of the election. Mr. Lombardi shared that all four towns are planning to offer mail in voting for this election. There will be no in person early voting. Mr. Lombardi noted that the debt exclusion is important in Brewster, if the project were to receive voter approval through the district wide election and Brewster didn’t vote to exclude the debt, we would have to identify ways to raise the funds within our existing levy limit. Approval of the debt exclusion is important because otherwise we are looking at potentially funding this by making cuts elsewhere in the Town budget. Selectperson Chaffee moved to call a Special Town Election to bring a debt exclusion ballot question to Brewster residents. Selectperson Chatelain second. Selectperson Chatelain amended the motion and moved that the Town submit the debt exclusion question for the member towns, shall the Town of Brewster be allowed to exempt from the provisions of proposition two and one-half, so -called, the amounts required to pay it allocable share of the additional bonds issued by the Nauset Regional School District to pay costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto, said question to be put to the voters on January 10, 2023. Selectperson Bingham second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. 6:15pm Public Hearing- Annual All Alcohol Beverage License Transfer and Pledge of Collateral- A Rose Realty Inc, d/b/a Ferretti’s Market Selectperson Chaffee moved to open the public hearing. Selectperson Bingham second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Attorney John Mooradian joined the meeting on behalf of Ferretti Liquors Market, Inc., his client is purchasing Ferretti’s market and are seeking a transfer of the beer and wine package store license, Navin Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 4 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Patel is the manager of record and is also seeking approval of the pledge of the license inventory. This is a change of business ownership; the store footprint is not changing. Mr. Patel is TIPS certified, has experience with package store sales and is the co-owner of the Hyannis package store. He anticipates having 5-7 employees depending on the season. Store hours will be 630am – 11pm Monday- Sunday and alcohol sales will be as permitted by law, Monday to Saturday 8am – 11pm and Sunday starting at 10am. The market will continue to operate as a convenience store with beer and wine and the deli. The new owners will work with the Board of Health for additional permitting. The ABCC takes 6-8 weeks post hearing to approve the license. Selectperson Bingham moved to close the public hearing. Selectperson Chaffee second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Selectperson Bingham moved to approve the transfer of liquor license. Selectperson Chatelain second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Bingham-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Presentation on Opioid Abatement Funds & Potential Regional Solutions- Kate Lena, Barnstable County Department of Human Services Kate Lena noted that the abatement funds are not awarded from Barnstable County but from the State. The key points of the Opioid Recovery and Remediation Fund presentation include: Introduction and Background- 2021 $26B Federal settlement agreement, with $500M coming to Massachusetts with the intent to bring relief to those struggling with substance abuse disorder. Funds are provided directly to individuals, towns/cities, counties and the state department of public health. To support the work an advisory council was created with representation from all over the commonwealth, including Cape Cod. State Guidelines for municipal spending includes encouragement to pool abatement funds to increase their impact. Funds cannot to be used to fund care already being reimbursed by the state. The seven broad topics in the areas in which the state is requiring the funds to be used was reviewed: o Opioid use disorder treatment o Support people in treatment and recovery o Connections to care o Harm reduction o Address the needs of criminal-justice-involved-people o Support pregnant or parenting women and their families o Prevent misuse of opioids and implement prevention education Regional Substance Addiction Council (RSAC) General Recommendations, collected by community members and evidence based and based on needs of residents on Cape Cod: o Pool funds and collaborate with area municipalities o Involve people impacted by substance use disorder in the conversation of how to spend the funds o Create evidence- based plans for spending Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 5 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator o Spend funds on substance use-related projects that will directly impact people with substance use disorder and their loved ones Review of the RSAC guidance on prevention, harm reduction, recovery and treatment RSAC menu of program examples are evidence based and identified as interventions needed on Cape Cod. The encouragement from the County is how to develop a comprehensive substance use program that is best serving to residents. Review of available resources and references. Ms. Lena noted that from the County’s understanding the funds need to be spent within the fiscal year that they are dispensed, but there are some mechanisms to be able to carry them over. Adding that there is an amendment at the state level that would designate the funds as their own to be exempt from the traditional local finance laws. Mr. Lombardi added that on page 163 is a one-page document that outlines how much each Town had been allocated, in the first few years looking at $20-$30K in annual payments, then it drops to $12-$16K per year starting in FY26 and through FY38. Right now, absent an appropriation these are miscellaneous revenues that aren’t available for expenditure in FY23. Mr. Lombardi noted that the Town has options; allow the funds to fall to free cash or create a special purpose reserve fund, which would require Town Meeting to appropriate these revenues into the account, and when looking to appropriate funds for a particular service, would need to go back to Town Meeting. Mr. Lombardi shared that he has met with the Fire Chief, Police Chief and Health Director on how Brewster could potentially use these funds and is eager to hear some potential regional initiatives to make sure our share of the funds would be leveraged to make the greatest impact. Update on School Committee Decision Regarding Potential Elementary School Consolidation- Katie Miller Jacobus, Brewster School Committee Chair (Select Board FY23-24 Strategic Plan Goal CI-3) Katie Miller Jacobus, Keith Gauley, and Steve Guditus, Principals from the elementary schools, joined the meeting. Ms. Miller Jacobus stated that the school committee at their Oct 20th meeting voted to table consolidation at this time because neither school can accommodate the pre-K through grade 5 student population until we see further decline in enrollment. The school committee will continue to monitor enrollment figures. Over the course of the last 10 months, the school committee considered multiple sources, and received a very granular quantity study last January. Through staff input, public forum input that included multiple stakeholders, site visits and ongoing discussion with administration and meetings, there have been multiple concerns on how to maintain the excellent academic programming. Additionally, there may be a need for additional main classrooms based on the class sizes, plus with the integrated pre-k program offing full day there was an increase in classrooms, plus a waitlist. It is the school committee charge on how to best serve the educational needs, not just numbers you can fit into the building, but qualitative concerns as well. Selectperson Chaffee shared that she supported the consolidation as long as it did not compromise the quality of educational programs and if it provided real cost savings. The analysis completed shows that the goals cannot be accomplished through consolidation at this time. Pleased to hear that the school committee will continue to re-evaluate if variables change. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 6 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator There was a question regarding separating the pre-K from the other student population, Ms. Miller Jacobus noted that this would require having multiple services (nurse, OT, PT, janitorial, etc.) and would not offer any benefit and additionally the school committee feels they still would not have the space. Mr. Lombardi asked if in the course of the discussion was there a specific threshold where enrollment would get to that the school committee would pick this back up and discuss consolidation again? Ms. Miller Jacobus shared that the threshold would be that there would be three sections per grade, not the four that we have currently. Mr. Gauley agreed, adding that school counsel recommendation is to look at the low to mid 50s range, which would be along with the class size recommendations and guidelines. Discuss and Vote on Updated Memorandum of Understanding Between Cape Light Compact and Town of Brewster Regarding Energy Manager Position – Select Board FY23-24 Strategic Plan Goal CA-1 Mr. Lombardi stated that we have not received the final information from the Cape Light Compact and will place on a future agenda. Review and Vote to Sign Lease Agreement with Dish Wireless, LLC for cabinet space at 1657 Main Street Cell Tower and Request for Consent to Install Equipment at the above location from Crown Castle on behalf of Dish Wireless, LLC and Review and Vote to Sign Lease Agreement with AT&T Mobility Corp. for cabinet space at 1657 Main Street Cell Tower Ms. Kalinick presented information about both this agenda item and the next one regarding the lease agreement with AT&T Mobility Corp. There is a cell tower at the Fire Station in which the Town currently have a master lease with Crown Castle and there are two additional cabinet spaces at the location. One is currently occupied by AT&T, the lease term is nearing with no options to renew. The Town issued a request for proposals for both cabinet spaces and received replies from AT&T to continue at the space they currently have as well as a proposal from Dish Wireless to occupy the second cabinet space. The lease agreements were reviewed by Town Counsel, there is base rent plus a 40% co-location fee. For Dish Wireless there is a request from Crown Castle to allow for the installation of equipment. Ms. Kalinick recommends the board sign the request, it will not be released until we have the two items that are required, a full set of plans (available in the packet) and a $5,000 removal bond, along with a schedule for construction which will require them to go through the permitting process with the Building Department. Selectperson Chaffee moved to sign the lease agreement with Dish Wireless LLC for cabinet space at 1657 Main Street cell phone tower and request to consent to install equipment at the above location from Crown Castle on behalf of Dish Wireless, LLC. Selectperson Bingham second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Selectperson Chaffee moved to vote to sign the lease agreement with AT&T Mobility Corp. for cabinet space at 1657 Main Street cell tower. Selectperson Bingham second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 7 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Review and Vote to Allow Two Family Trust to Assign the Lease Agreement for Lot #3 in Freeman’s Way Industrial Park to James Trainor & Conditionally Approve and Sign Memorandum of Lease Extension Mr. Lombardi stated that when commerce park was formed, town meeting approved the formation of a separate Brewster Industrial Development Financing Authority. This authority was given responsibility of development of the park and had the legal authority to enter lease agreement with tenants. In 1985, the authority entered a 30-year lease with E&J realty Trust for use of lot 3. In 1990 the authority was dissolved, and the Select Board was given jurisdiction of Commerce Park. The original lease included a one-time 20-year option through to 2035. The tenant provided notice to the Town when the initial term was up in 2015, but due to a variety of circumstances the matter was not taken up by the Town at the time. The tenants have been making regular lease payments to the Town. Selectperson Chaffee moved to allow Two Family Trust to assign the lease agreement for lot #3 in Freeman’s Way Industrial Park to James Trainor and to conditionally approve and sign memorandum of lease extension. Selectperson Chatelain second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Selectperson Chaffee- yes, Selectperson Bingham-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Discuss Need to Update Select Board Policy #6: Appointments to Town Committees Mr. Lombardi noted that the previous policy included provision for non-Brewster voters, part-time residents to be appointed to serve on some ad hoc or advisory committees that the Select Board has jurisdiction over. We have a number of vacancies on various board and committees, it is not explicit in the charges for committees the extent to which the Select Board supports part-time residents to serve on these boards or committees. Selectperson Chaffee stated she is comfortable to open the opportunity to part-time residents to all boards and committees listed on the memo except for the following: Natural Resources Advisory Committee, Open Space Committee, Vision Planning Committee. Selectperson Chatelain would add Pleasant Bay Alliance to the list. The Select Board discussed setting a limit of the number of non-voters on boards and committees. One per committee to start with to evaluate. The charges for the committee/boards that will allow for non-voters will be updated and voted on at a future meeting. Selectperson Chaffee noted that we are not setting aside a non-voter position, but if there was a qualified applicant they could be appointed. For Your Information No comments Matters Not Reasonably Anticipated by the Chair Mr. Lombardi noted that Article #9 on the Special Town Meeting warrant looks to explicitly set deadlines for the submission of citizens petitions to be included on the Special Town Meeting warrant and to clarify the deadline for Annual Town Meeting. The current bylaw, that has been on the books for 45 years has been practically implemented, citizens petition for ATM are due 75 days in advance but has been silent on Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.07.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 8 of 8 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator deadline for STM. The long-standing practice has been a deadline of 45 days in advance. The feedback received from the Attorney General’s Office is that while other towns have a similar bylaw that has been approved in years past, they have taken a different perspective on the bylaws recently and likely would not approve the bylaw as drafted as it would inhibit citizen access to submitting a petition for inclusion in the Town meeting warrant. Based on this feedback, which was not expected, Mr. Lombardi recommends that the Select Board make a motion to indefinitely postpone Article 9. Mr. Lombardi noted that the Town will have to re-examine our procedures and recommend to citizens to submit by a date to help them achieve the policy ends they are seeking in their petition but can’t reject a citizen petition as long as it is submitted in advance of the warrant being posted. Questions from the Media None Next Meetings November 10 (Attend Natural Resources Advisory Committee), November 14 (Town Meeting), November 22 (Joint with Conservation Commission and Water Commission), December 5, December 12, and December 19 2022 Adjournment Selectperson Chaffee moved to adjourn at 7:09pm. Selectperson Chatelain second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Bingham-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Respectfully submitted by Erika Mawn, Executive Assistant Approved: __________________ Signed: _________________________________________ Date Selectperson Hoffmann, Clerk of the Select Board Accompanying Documents in Packet: Agenda, TA Report, Consent agenda items, Public Hearing documents, Town meeting article assignments, Opioid abatement funds presentation, School Committee decision on elementary school consolidation, Nauset Regional High School project documents, MOU with Cape Light Compact, Lease Agreements (Dish Wireless LLC and AT&T Mobility Corp), Two Family Trust Lease Agreement documents, Select Board Policy #6, FYIs. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.14.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 1 of 2 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator MINUTES OF THE SELECT BOARD MEETING REGULAR SESSION DATE: November 14, 2022 TIME: 5:00 PM PLACE: 384 Underpass Road, Brewster MA REMOTE PARTICIPANTS: Chair Whitney, Selectperson Chatelain, Selectperson Chaffee, Selectperson Hoffmann, Town Administrator Peter Lombardi, Assistant Town Administrator Donna Kalinick, Town Counsel Gregg Corbo ABSENT: Selectperson Bingham Call to Order, Declaration of a Quorum, Meeting Participation Statement and Recording Statement Chair Whitney called the meeting to order at 5:00pm, read the meeting participation and recording statements and declared a quorum. The Board reviewed a letter received from Len Egert where he requests to add an article to the warrant for the Spring 2023 Town Meeting which, in substance, will revisit the Drummer Boy Park Master Plan and its inclusion of the Wing Island Boardwalk. Mr. Lombardi shared that technically if the Town moves forward with some iteration of the project and if the project comes in under budget such that it can be covered with a combination of the donation pledge and/or grants, there is no guarantee that this would go back to Town Meeting. Based on resident feedback Mr. Lombardi believes that people are looking for assurance that they will have an opportunity to vote on the project. It is clear that residents are using the Drummer Boy Master Plan Phase 1 improvements and the Local Comprehensive Plan as a proxy for their opposition to the boardwalk. Mr. Lombardi stated the question is whether the Board would be inclined to do that, and if that would be an announcement made at Town Meeting. The Board shared their thoughts on the letter and the recent BCN meeting. Members of the Board agree that announcing that an article will be in the Spring 2023 ATM will lead to a more productive discussion about the two items that have been linked to the project, the Drummer Boy Park Master Plan and the Local Comprehensive Plan. Selectperson Chatelain will make the announcement before presenting Article 2. Mr. Lombardi noted that the Moderator will have to recuse himself from one of the capital requests on Article 2, the Stony Brook Gristmill retaining and fishways passage improvements permitting, Ben deRuyter will be stepping in. There are three motions for Article 2, two requests that require water quality stabilization funding are 2/3 votes and will be separated out. The Board discussed the announcement regarding bringing an article to Spring 2023 Town Meeting in more detail, they believe this will allow sufficient time to bring information to Town meeting. Mr. Lombardi stated that a citizen petition or Select Board initiated article that doesn’t have an appropriation is non-binding, the Select Board can’t direct the Town to do a project or not. It is important to share that during this time the Town will continue to work on the project to present residents with viable options at Town Meeting. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov Select Board 11.14.2022 www.brewster-ma.gov Page 2 of 2 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Selectperson Chatelain made a suggestion for the announcement. Board members discussed the announcement and offered adjustments as needed. As for future public forums, the Board had agreed on an expanded ecological assessment and management plan review, but currently don’t have a consultant on board to complete the third-party analysis, the Board can say in the coming months or near future. It is important to share that we have heard the feedback from residents and have made changes and will give residents the opportunity to weigh in. The Board should differentiate between the boardwalk project and the Drummer Boy Park Master Plan at every opportunity. Selectperson Chaffee moved to place a Wing Island Boardwalk article on next Springs 2023 ATM and to continue public engagement activities in the meantime. Selectperson Hoffmann second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Selectperson Hoffmann-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. The Board reviewed the articles and presenters, Articles 1,2,3 and 14 will be the order for all finance related articles. Chair Whitney reviewed his comments regarding Articles 6,7 and 8. On Article 6, Limits of Debate, though the title of the bylaw and the article is “limits of debate”, this is not intended to limit debate but to limit the time an individual speaker has to comment on an article. The Select Board voted to bring these articles to the residents, not recommending voting for them, but bring them as a consideration. Article 4, Elizabeth Taylor will not be at Town Meeting and Selectperson Chaffee will provide background. Article 5, Mr. deRuyter will present as the Moderator will recuse himself and Faythe Ellis will be speaking about this article. The Moderator will make an announcement at the beginning of the meeting that there will be a motion to indefinitely postpone Article 9. The Board expects at least two motions, one on the Drummer Boy Park Master Plan and another on the Local Comprehensive Plan to commit it to further study by the Vision Planning Committee. The Board decided to assess at 9:30pm the progress of the meeting and determine if a second night of Town Meeting is needed. Adjournment Selectperson Hoffmann moved to adjourn at 5:33pm. Selectperson Chaffee second. A roll call vote was taken. Selectperson Hoffmann-yes, Selectperson Chatelain-yes, Selectperson Chaffee-yes, Chair Whitney-yes. The Board vote was 4-Yes, 0-No. Respectfully submitted, Erika Mawn, Executive Assistant Approved: __________________ Signed: _________________________________________ Date Selectperson Hoffmann, Clerk of the Select Board Page 1 of 2 TOWN OF BREWSTER SPECIAL TOWN ELECTION WARRANT January 10, 2023 Barnstable, ss. To: Roland W. Bassett, Jr. Constable of the Town of Brewster Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts you are hereby directed to notify and warn the inhabitants of Brewster who are qualified to vote in town affairs to meet at the Brewster Baptist Church, 1848 Main Street, in said Brewster on TUESDAY, the TENTH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023, then and there to act upon the following question: QUESTION 1 Shall the Town of Brewster be allowed to exempt from the provisions of proposition two and one-half, so-called, the amounts required to pay its allocable share of the additional bonds issued by the Nauset Regional School District to pay costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto? Yes____ No ____ The polls will open at 11:00 o’clock a.m. and close at 7:00 o’clock p.m. Hereof fail not, and make due return of the Warrant with your doings thereon to the Town Clerk at the time and place of aforesaid election. Given under our hands and seal of the Town of Brewster hereto affixed this 5th day of December, 2022. A true copy, ATTEST: __________________________________ David C. Whitney, Chair __________________________________ Edward B. Chatelain, Vice-Chair __________________________________ Kari Sue Hoffmann, Clerk __________________________________ Mary W. Chaffee __________________________________ Cynthia A. Bingham Town of Brewster Selectboard Page 2 of 2 I, Roland W. Bassett, duly qualified Constable for the Town of Brewster, hereby certify that I served the Warrant for the Special Town Election of January 10th, 2023, by posting attested copies thereof, in the following locations in the Town of Brewster on the _____ day of December, 2022, in accordance with the Town Bylaws: Brewster Town Offices Brewster Ladies Library Café Alfresco The Brewster Store Millstone Liquors U.S. Post Office Brewster Pizza House _____________________________________ Roland W. Bassett, Jr., Constable 11/21/2007 13:52 FAX 617 742 3238 a002/002 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Elections Division TO: Elections Officials FROM: Michelle K. Tassinari, Legal Counsel DATE: November 3, 2006 RE: Public hearings and meetings on primary or Election Day We have received many inquiries as to whether public hearings or meetings are permitted on Election Day. The following are the only public meetings that must not be held on Election Day: 1. All public hearing held under Zoning Act by city councils, planning boards, and boards of appeals. G_ L. c. 40A § 11 (2004 ed.) i ( 2. Pi..blic hearings by the State Department of Community Affairs on low -rent public housing projects. G. L. c. 121B § 31 (2004 ed.) All other public hearings and meetings appear to be permitted on Election Day, although we do not recommend holding them on the day of the election. This prohibition explicitly includes the Boston Board of Appeal, under its special act. 1956 Mass. Acts. c. 665 § 8, as amended by 1973 Mass. Acts. c. 296 § 4. One Ashburton Place, 17th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2828 11 /'71 /7.nn7 to7n , ao rl-nR Tan RnoZ1 Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 Fax: (508) 896-8089 Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Memo To: Brewster Select Board From: Erika Mawn, Executive Assistant Date: November 29, 2022 RE: Facility Use Applications The Brewster Conservation Trust has submitted two applications for use of Town owned land. The first is for an educational nature hike at Calf Field Pond Trail, West Gate Road on Sunday January 1, 2023 between 10am and 12pm. The expected number of attendees is 20. The Natural Resources Department Director has reviewed the request and suggested any parking needs be coordinated in advance. Brewster Conservation Trust along with Brewster’s Natural Resources Department will be hosting Conservation Day at Drummer Boy Park on Saturday July 8, 2023, from 8:30am – 3:00pm. The application has been reviewed by various departments and their feedback is outlined in this memo. All feedback/comments will be shared with the Brewster Conservation Trust and Natural Resources Department, who will communicate with the Director of the DPW and the Manager of Facilities to plan for this event. Brewster Conservation Day started in 2012 to celebrate the community’s natural resources and organizations dedicated to saving them. Attendees can learn from over 40 unique presentations while joining in special activities to learn about ocean resources, coastal erosion, herring migration, whale rescue, and alternative energy and septic systems. Below, please find feedback from department heads for the above events. Building Department: Any single tent exceeding 400 SF requires a tent permit application. This includes smaller tents conjoined to create a larger unit exceeding 400 SF. Town Administration: They should have a police detail; please consult with Police Department. They will need to provide port-a-johns for the event. They should ask their vendors to be responsible for their own trash removal. Any serving of food/food vendors needs to be permitted through the Board of Health. They may also need a Hawker and Peddlers through the Select Board. No vehicles are to transverse across the paved walking paths. They need to work with DPW ahead so that we can put up traffic measures near the walking paths. They need to work with facilities regarding water and electric usage. The sale of single use plastic bottled water is prohibited on town property. Planning Department: No concerns or specific comments. Fire Department: All tents shall have a permanently affixed label indicating appropriate fire retardant ratings. Multiple tents placed side by side shall have a 12 ft. fire break clearance on all sides for every 700 square feet of tent (Ex. When seven 10’ x 10’ (or greater) tents are placed side by side there shall be a 12’ break every 700’ or less dependent on size of tent. Parked vehicles or internal combustion engines such as generators shall not be located closer than 20 feet to any tent or membrane structure 400 sq ft or more and/or multiple tents placed side by side with an aggregate area of 700 sq ft. For the purpose of determining required distance, support ropes and guy wires shall be considered as part of the temporary membrane structure or tents. Access to field vendors by fire department vehicles shall not be blocked. All lanes in between tents shall be no less than 12' in width. No parking on interior roads shall be permitted. Police Department: All applicants should be advised that if there are impacts to traffic flow on Route 6A, a police detail may be required. Health Department: Any food vendors will need to follow up with the Health Department for proper permitting. Brewster Conservation Trust Sunday, January 1, 2023 Nature Hike Educational walk x x 15 20 04-2798931 Brewster Conservation Trust c/o Amy Henderson 36 Red Top Road, Brewster, Ma 02631 508-694-6720 508-694-6720 Calf Field Pond Trail, West Gate Rd 10:00 am 12:00 pm Brewster Conservation Trust (co-sponsor with Town of Brewster) Educational Fair Educational Exhibits x x 500- 800 150-200 04-2798931 Brewster Conservation Trust c/o Amy Henderson 36 Red Top Road, Brewster, Ma 02631 508-694-6720 508-694-6720 Drummer Boy Park, Rte 6A, Brewster, Ma 3:00 pm Saturday, July 8, 2023 (Set up on Friday, July 7, 2023) 8:00 am 2000 Corporate Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317 P ho ne : ( 7 2 4) 41 6- 2 70 3 E m ai l : J oa nn e. Di S a n ti s. C on t ra ct or @c ro wn c as t l e. c om www.crowncastle.com 634957 - Verizon Wireless October 24, 2022 TOWN OF BREWSTER 2198 MAIN STREET TOWN ADMINISTRATOR BREWSTER, MA 02631-2536 Re: BU 806690 / “CCD BREWSTER 959497” / 1657 MAIN STREET, BREWSTER, MA 02770 (“Site”) Land Lease Agreement, dated August 22, 1996, as it may have been amended and assigned (“Lease”) Consent for Verizon Wireless modifications Dear TOWN OF BREWSTER, I am reaching out to you on behalf of Crown Atlantic Company LLC (“Lessee”) in order to obtain your consent as may be required by the Lease. In order to better serve the public and minimize the amount of towers in an area where this property is located, Verizon Wireless intends to modify its equipment at the wireless communication facility (the “Modification”). Please provide your consent as soon as posible by signing below and returning so that we may install Verizon Wireless’s equipment as permitted under the Lease. Pursuant to Section 1 of the Lease, if you do not respond within 20 days, the modifications shall be deemed approved. Please see the enclosed supplemental materials, as may be required by the Lease. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Joanne DiSantis at (724) 416-2703 or Joanne.DiSantis.Contractor@crowncastle.com Sincerely, Joanne DiSantis Joanne DiSantis Real Estate Specialist Agreed and accepted [Date]_________ ___________ (Date) (Lessor’s signature) (Lessor’s name and title) TOWN OF BREWSTER October 24, 2022 Page 2 634957 - Verizon Wireless [Enclosures] P.S. Please indicate below if you are interested in learning more about removing the obligation for you to sign these consent letters and receive a notice letter instead. ☐ (check here) Yes, I’m interested in learning more. verizonv VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 VERIZON SITE NAME: BREWSTER_MA_HD VERIZON FUZE ID: 16274236 SITE TYPE: SELF SUPPORT TOWER HEIGHT: 135'-0" BUSINESS UNIT #: SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: JURISDICTION: 806690 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 BARNSTABLE TOWN OF BREWSTER VERIZON - MODIFICATION;5G_L-SUB6-PREP,5G_RADIO SWAP SITE INFORMATION 01(04-8 CAME USA INC. SITE NAME: MIT. ADDRESS: COUNTY: MAP/PARCEL#: AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: LATITUDE LONGITUDE.: LAT/LONG TYPE: GROUND ELEVATION: CURRENT ZONING IURISDICTION: ()C.CU PANCY CL1SSIFIC.ATION: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: A.D.A. COMPLIANCE: PROPERTY OWNER TOWER OWNER CARRIER/APPLICANT: ELECTRIC PROVIDER, '11-1(0 PROVIDER: CCD BREWSTER 999497 1657 MAIN S'T' BREWSTER, MA 02770 BARNSTABLE 56_6_0 EXISTING 41° 45' 24.63" -70° 5' 28,41 NAD83 30 FT 141 TOWN OF BRF.WSTER TB FACILITY 10 UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION BREWSTER TOWN OF 1671 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02631 CROWN CASTLE 20(10 CORPORATE DRIVE CANONSBURG, PA 15317 VERIZON WIRELESS 180 WASHINGTON VALLEY ROAD BEDMINSTER, NJ 07921 NSTAR (800) 572-9337 COMCASI' (801)) 934-0489 PROJECT TEAM • 90,)) 1,111.11: 1.111 N 1,6520E USA INC. DISTRICT rINTAMS: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 329 TRYON ROAD RALEIGH. NC 276113 (919)691-6351 JOSEPH 1. CRESS - PROJECT MANAGER SCOTT. C BRANTL.EY - CIVIL ENGINEER 6325 ARDREY KELL ROAD, SUITE 600 CHARLOTTE;, NC 28277 SARA REA LOADHOLDT - A&E SPECIALIST (704) 405-6548 DRAWING INDEX SHEET 0 SHEET DESCRIPTION 1-1 TITLE SHEET 9-2 GI BRAE, NOTES C-1 SITE PLAN C-2 TOWER ELEVATION & ANTENNA PLANS C-3 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES C.4 EQUIPMENT DETAILS C-9 EQUIPMENT DETAILS C-6 COLOR CODE MA'1R1X 1-7 PLUMBING DIAGRAM G-1 GROUNDING DETAILS G.2 GROUNDING DETAILS ATTACHED MOUNT MODIFICATION ALL DRAWINGS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE FORMATTED FOR FULL SIZE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SI'1T. AND SHALL. IMMEDIATELY NI'000EX"THP, ENGINEER IN WRITING 01. ANY DISCREPANCIES BEI'ORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. APPROVALS SIGNATURF CONTRACTOR PMI REQUIREMENTS P\11 ACCESSED 6'!' SMART TOOL VENDOR PROJECT NUMBER \',\V LC/CATION CODE (PSLC) Enp //Pmi.9Nwsman.cnm N/A 138524 .0 PM) AND RIX)CIREMENTS 9110 EMBEDDED IN MOUNT 519.9) 5'519 REPORT MOUNT MODIFICATION REQUIRED Y VzW APPROVED SMART KIT VENDORS R117ER'0)51(1014) 4011111(,1)1014 DRAM INGS PAGE FOR 1210\ 55100( 1.11 1PPIi0\-11) \ NDORS LOCATION MAP • BIN 00049 9 0 NO SC:11-1: 1112190N); DIRECTIONS FROM VERIZON LOCAL. OFFICE: 0421 ORLEANS -HARWICH RD, FAST HARWICH, TEA 02643, UNITED STATES) 11 ‘D N1. PO TOWARD BREWSTER-CHATH:159 RD. TURN RIGHT TOWARD BREWSTER-CHATHAM RD. TURN LEFT ONTO BREWSTER-CHATHAM RD. CONTI,NU'F: ()\'111 NIA.1r\/LONG POND RD TURN 0 Fr, )NTT 1 MAIN ST. TURN RIGHT AT BREWS'1'I 11 RD. TURN LEFT. APPLICABLE CODES/REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ALL 55()RKSHAI.I.10)P1:RFORMED AND M:YTERI\ IS INSTAIA.IED IN .\-C/RD :\,. 1 \\1111 THE. CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE. 10)1.11 GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING LN THESE PLANS 1S TO BE CONSTRUED T C) '1:X0111 WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THF,SE CODES, CODE TYPE CODE. BUILDING 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE MECHANICAL. 2015 INTERN ATION AI. TIECHANICAL CODE ELECTRICAL 2020 NEC WITH MA AMENDMENTS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS DATED, 10/13/2022 MOUNT ANALYSIS: MASER CONSULTING DATED: 09/08/2021 REDS REVISION, 0 DATED: 08/23/2021 ORDER ID: 634057 REVISION: 0 CHIT. MASSACHUSETTS ONE CALI. (888) 344. 33 CALL{ WORIC-NG DAIS BEFORE VOLT DIG. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1111'. I'1 RF()SE OF THIS PROJECT IS 1111 911,181.1. 0I1)) I)I19\I) 1:()NNLFTIVITY AND CAPACITY TO TI IE EX05TING ELIGIBLE \\ IRELESS FACILITY. 1119 ER SCOPE OF WORK: • REMOVE. (3) ANTENNAS • REMOVE (9) RRHs • INSTALL (3) ANTENNAS • INSTALL (6) RR -Is • INSTALL (3) SIDE -BY -SIDE ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKETS 91/111.. RI )0 TO!\CCESSING/ENII RAN(, 1 111 '0)11 0 01 \I1' S'T )NTV "I II1C(RI)IVNNO( \'1'(8(10) -88-T111 (RI AV\ /N -S9 RUC, I; ;N 51,1'8 1(1111 verizonv 11,1979)11,5,0,1-05, \'ALLT5 ROAD BI OA11NS1ER VI 0,21 am:, CROWN CASTLE 12011 514C.4RTFIFR BLVD, SUITE 2-1,11 MAII\V"AH, NJ 07430 A 1 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC. 27603 (919) 661-6351 TEE)- R #:5',99\778159 V'ERTZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BC #1 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN S'r BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR: SCOTTO 10/20/22 IT ISA VIOLATION OF LkW FOR ANY PERS°, 1 11�)911a 111u n1�n n1.N 1_ 9.A. SHEET NUMBER: T-1 r REVISION: 0 CROWN CASTLE USA INC. SITE ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS: COMMENCENOTICE 70 PROCEED- PRIOR TO CROWN CASTLE USA INC. WRITTEN NOTICE ED MUST AND THE ESSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER. P ACCESSING/ENTERING THE SITTEPY PROCEED CONTACT THE CROWN CASTLE USA INC. NOC AT 800-788-7011 & H CROWN CASTLE USA "LOOK MANAGER. LOOKUP" - CROWN CASTLEUSA INC. SAFETY CLIMB REQUIREMENT: THE TIY OF THE SAFETY CLIMB AND ALL COMPONENTSNOF THE P CU TTY SHALL BE CONSIDERED ER MODIFICA0ON, MOUNT ftCEMENUS. AND/ORS EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONSSTHA COMPROMISE THE IN RY OR RUNCTTIONAL USE OF THE SAFETY CLIMB OR ANY COMPONENTS NOT FCTHE CLIMBING FACILITYONTHE STRUCTURE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE. BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, PINCHING OF THE WIRE ROPE, BENDING OF THE WIRE ROPE FROM ITS SUPPORTS, DIRECT CONTACT OR CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE WIRE ROPE WHICH CAUSEMAY W.R. FRICTIONAL W IMPACT TO HE ANCHORAGE POINTS TS ANY WAY, OR TO IMPEDE/BLOCK ITS INTENDED D USE. ANY COMPROMISED SAFETY CLIMB. INCLUDING EXISTING CONDITIONS MUST BE TAGGED OUT AND REPORTED TO YOUR CROWN CASTLE USA INC. POC OR CALL THE NOC TO GENERATE A SAFETY CLIMB MAINTENANCEAND CONTRACTOR NOTICE TICKET. PRIORTO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL REQUIRED JURISDICTIONAL PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED. THIS INCLUDES. BUi IS NOT LIMITED TO, BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, FIRE 1NLP ZONE, REQUIRED ENTA, PERMITS SHALL B . AESFIED AND CLOSED AND CONSTRUCTION ARE COMPLETEONALL REQUIREMENTS, SHALL 0E 5 AM CLOSED OUT ACCORDING TO LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND METHODS: INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED T0, ERECTION PLANS, RIGGING PLANS, CLIMBING PLANS, AND RESCUE PLANS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN, AND SHALL MEET ANSISHTECmars rN St(L TEST EDP.):: FEDERAL L STATE, OAND LOCAL ON REGULATIONS: AND ANY APPLICABLE INDUSTRY PLANS 5 LL ADHERE iC ANSI/OSSE 410.46 (LATEST 11 11100 1400 040WN PERFORMED. USA INC. STANDARD DING H REQUIRED INVOLVEMENT A QUALIFIED ENGINEER FOR (LATEST CONSTRUCTION, 5TO CERTIFY HE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE(5) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/TU-322 (LATEST EDITION). ALL SITE WORK TO COMPLY WITH OAS -STD -10068 "INSTALLATION STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON CROWN CASTLE USA INC. TOWER SITE," CEO -STD -10294 "STANDARD FOR INSTALLATION OF RUNTS AND APPURTENANCES," AND LATEST VERSION 0 ANS/TA-1019E4-2D. FOR INSTALLATION, , NN AND MAINTENANCE OF ANTENNA STRUCTURES SUPPORTING 5 ANTENNAS." 6. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY CROWN CASTLE USA INC. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY SUCH H INSTALLATION. 7. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WIH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES, CONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMP, WITH ALL APPLIC.LE NICIP, AND UT A NT SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, REGULATIONS.ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OHERWISE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. WATER,ALL EXISTING ACTNE SEWER. GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES RE ENCOUNTERED IN THE Z311 rZIAT-2;',Ts REpUREDATR TH OF THE TEO B CONTRACTOR ,FRANC FOR THE RWRILLI1N 0400PIERS IS WILL OR CLUB UTILITIES BU NOT BETLLIMITED SHALL PROVIDE SAF 8) CONTANNED 01100. 0)WEELECITRIC, SAFE,1$ 5) TRENCHIIDE NG BUD) NOT BE10N TO A) FALL PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SAFE, PROCEDURES. EXCAVATION I1 ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE S. LATEST AASS0\4 KAYED ON R H THE STAMPED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIO12. CONTRACTONSHALL KEEP E SITE ED REVISION. FROM ACCUMULATING WASTE MATED,. DEBRIS, AND TRASH AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IF NECESSARY. RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, SIC., STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM 'RE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 13. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH HE EXECUTION 0 HSWORK HALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED OF DINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH K, H HE EXECUTION OF THEW SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL CO ACTOR, TOWER OWNER, CROWN CASTLE USA NC., ND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 14. 10 TaDRQu1REo ev IS2-%Inrvo sorvNE REOLURM DN VIN ,;%-,, PIECES of ore EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND SHELTERS. 15. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE CARRIER'S EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. Ie. THE SUB ARESHALL 6 HAL E COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 17. foLE11 AREAS OF HE OWNESSFAPROPER, LL BE AOEOURBEO BY HE WORK AN AND STABILIZED COVERED BY THfEfTTOWER, EROSION AS SPECIFIED OR A ON HE CONSTRUCTION D0RAWIN. AND/OR A UNIFORM PROJECT 5PECIFICA4ON5. 18. CONTRACTORORES.IFSHALL MINIMIZE EDURED DURNGTCONSTNCE TO RUG4ONEXISTNL SITENOURING CONFORMANCE TMEROSI04 00488ANES MFOR EASURES. AN SEDIMENT CONTROL. SHALL BE LOCAL 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. PAVEMENTS, CURBS. LANDSCAPING AM STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER, 20 CONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND F'ROPERLY LS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES N THESEXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS SE OF ALL SCRAP A REMOVED SHALL BE FEETURNED REMOVED FROM 21. CONTRACTORS SHALL OWNERS PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. TRASH AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. 22 SHALL BE PLACE ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. GREENFIELD GROUNDING NOTES: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. GENERAL NOTES: FOR HE PURPOSE OF CONSRUCHON DRAWINGS THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: GENERAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION CARRIER: DR VER120N TOWER OWNER, CROWN CASTLE USA INC. 2. THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN PREPARED USING STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND COMPLETENESS NORMALLY EXERCISED UNDER SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES By REPUTABLE ENGINEERS IN THIS OR SIMILAR LODUTIES. IT S ASSUMED THAT THE WORK DEPICTED WILL BE PERFORMED BY AN EXPERIENCED CONTRACTOR AND/OR WORKPEOPLE WHO HAVE A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPLICABLE CODE STANDARDS AND REOUREMENTS AND OF INDUSTRY ACCEPTED STANDARD GOOD PRACTICE. AS NOT EVERT CONDITION OR ELEMENT S (OR CAN BE) EXPLICITLY SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE INDUSTRY ACCEPTED STANDARD GOOD PRACTICE FOR MISCELLANEOUS DRAW ORK NOT EXPLICITLY INGS REPRESENT OWN. THESE WR STRUCTURE DR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY C S RESPONSIBLE FOR INDICATE CONSTRUCTIONMEANS, METHODS, 0 CHNOUES, SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY FOR PROTECTION OF 4FE AND PROPERTY DURING 41584 CONSTRUCTION. SUCHMEASURESSHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMNED N0, BRACING. FORMWORK, SHORING, ETC. 517E VISITS BY THE ENGINEER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT INCLUDE 4 INSPECTION OF THESE ITEMS AND IS F STR 01505 400L0 RATION OF HE FINISHED STRUCTURE ONLY. NOTES AND DETAILS N THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND TYPICAL DETAILS. WHERE NO DETAILS ARE SHOWN, CONSTRUCTION LSHALL CONFORM TO SIMILAR WORK ON THE PROJECT, AND/OR AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN PUNS, DETAILS. GENERAL NOTES. AND SPECIFICATIONS. EEGREATER. MORE N STRICT REQUIREMENTS, SHALL GOVERN. IF FURTHER CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED CONTACT THE 5. DIMENSIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ASSIST IN THE FABRICATION BEEN CONSTRUCTION ELTHE CONTRACTOR TO FELD VERIFY T. DIMENSIONS. EMENTS BUT LT AND/OR CLEARANCES SHOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS PRIOR TO FABRICATION RCUTTING OF ANY NEW DR EXISTING CONSTRUCHON ELEMENTS. DETERMINEDLT 15 H TO THAT T HB00 ARE N A5 SOONDISCREPANCIES 000/OR CONFLICTS WITH THE CONSTRUCTION 00081505THE ENGINEER OF D 6. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION or BIDS. THE BIDDING CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CE HE FAMILIARIZE WITH EXISTNG CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT T WORK N BE ACCOMPLISHED ASSHOWN ON CONSTRUCTIONTHE LA 7. ALWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CROWN CASTLE. THE L MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL TIONS ANDWORK LOCALCARRIED JURSDICTION. CODES. O UTIONSMP, WI. ALL APPLICABLE MUNI.. AND UTILRY COMPANY 8. NOTED OT 9 EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES AND LABOR S00400NECESSARY HTO COMPLETE ALLINSTALLATIONSASINDICATEDON THE A DRAWINGS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE HRH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. ID IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALL£° AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWNGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CARRIER AND CROWN CASTLE PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH Y SUCH C.NGE OF INSTALLATION. 11 CONTRACTOR 15 TO PERFORM INVESTIGATION AND IS AL DETERMINE THE BEST ROUTING OF L CONDUITS FOR POWER, AND TELCO ANDFOR GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN IN THE POWER, TELCO, AND GROUNDING PLAN DRAWINGS. 12. E CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART LL BEREPAIRED TRACTOR'S E% THE SATISFACTION OF CROWN C USA INC. 1} NTRACTOftSH LEGAL, LEGAL AND Y PR DISPOSE OF ALL SCR. MATERIALS H AS COAXIAL CABLES AND ITEMS H D FROM E EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNERS DESIGNATED LOCATION. a. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. TRASH AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SHE: ON A DAILY BASIS, CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS AND REINFORCING STEEL: ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, AS1M A184. 051A1 A185 AND HE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FDR CASTE F C -PLACE CONCRECONCRETE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED OR DESIGN F LABS AND FOUNDATIONS IS ASSUMED 0 BE 1000 pel. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESS.48100. 0STRENGTH (Nc) OF 300E psi AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO MORE )THAN 90 NEER FMINUTES SHALL ELAPSE FROM BATCHOF TE IMEATO LL TIME OF PLACEMENT UNLESS APS/ROVED BY THE OT CEED 90Y AT TIME F PLACEMENT. CONCRETEEXPOSED TO FREEZE -THAW CYCLES SHALT. CONTAIN AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES. AMOUNT OF AIR ENTRAINMENT TO BE BASED ON S AGGREGATE AN SURE (VERY 0.ENT C ENi USED TO BE TYPE II PORTLAND CEMENT WITH AZ MAXIMUMWATER-TO-CEMENT RATIO (W/G) OF Drs. ALL STEEL RE FABRIC (WHO STALL STM ES SHALL SHALL CLASS "B TENSON SP WLEESSE NOTE OTHERWISE. AL LLOKSLSHALLM BE STANDAR 90 DEREE HOOKS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. YIELD STRENGTH (Fy) OF STANDARD DEFORMED BARS ARE AS FOLLOWS, #4 BARS AND SMALLER ... . . . . . ...... ...... . .. . . . .......40 ksi X5 BARS AND LARGER. . .... . . . .......... .......... . ............60 ksi THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH.......................3" CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: X6 BARS AND URGER......... ......... . .. . . .......2" X5 BARS AND SMALLER .. ....... .. . 1-1/2" CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER SLAB AND WALLS. . ... ._.3/4" BUMS AND COLUMNS A TOOLED EDGE ORDANCE WITH AR .ALL AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE UNLESS ISE C 1 SE GON ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION. RADIO. LIGHTNING PROTECTION AND AC POWER GES'S) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AT OR 801_08 GRADE, BY 1W0 OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS N ACCORDANCE H THE N THE CONTRACTORSHALL PERFORM IEEE FALL-OF-POTENTAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING (PER IEEE 1100 AND 81) FOR GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT OF 5 OHMS OR LESS. THE TEE CONDUIT SU IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY SEQUENCING GROUNDING AND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLATION AS TO PREVENT ANY LOSS OF CONTINUO, IN THE GROUNDING SYSTEM DR DAMAGE TO THE CONDUIT AND PROVIDE TAL TESTING E LT.. AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING FITTINGS OR BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUI, WITH X6 COPPER WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS.° METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH HE POWER CIRCUITS TO BD EQUIPMENT. EACH CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, N6 STRANDED COPPER DR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS, N2 BARE SOLID TINNED COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS. 7. CONNECTIONS TO HE GROUND BUS SHALL NOT BE DOUBLED UP OR STACKED BACK TO BACK CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF HE GROUND BUS ARE PERMITTED. 8. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONDUCTORS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT/GROUND BARS AND THE GROUND RING SHALL BE X2 SOLID TINNED COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. AL 9. U (NUM CONDUCTOR OR COPPER CUD STEEL CONDUCTOR SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 10. USE OF 90' BENDS IN THE PROTECTION GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE AVOIDED WHEN 45' BENDS CAN BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED. BE USED FOR N D BELOW 12. All EXOTHERMIC GROUND CONNECTIONS ABOVE GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR)SHALL BE FORMED USING HIGH PRESS CRIMPS. 13. COMPRESSION GROUND CONNECTIONS MAY BE REPLACED BY EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONS. 14. ICE BRIDGE TORS SHALL EXOTHERMICALLY Is. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (i.e. R PASTE) ESSION AND BOLTED GROUND CONNECTIONS. SHALL 1I. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON -ELECTRICAL METAL BOXES, .FRAMES AND SUPPORTS MATERIAL BE BONDED TO HE GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH HE NEC. 18. BOND AU_ METALLIC OBJECTS WITHIN 6 TL OF MAIN GROUND RING WRH (1) X2 BARE SOLID TINNED COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 19. GROUND CONDUCTORS USED FOR THE FACILITY GROUNDING AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH METALLIC OBJECTS THAT FORM A AROUND THE CONDUCTOR, SUCH AS METALLICCONDUITS, METAL SUPPORT CLIPS OR I SLEEVES .ROUGH WALLS OR FLOORS- W URED TO BE HOUSED IN T TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL CONDITIING IONS, NON-METALLIC MATERIAL SUCH AS PVC CONDUIT SHALL BE CONDUITUSED. WHERE USE OF METAL S UNAVOIDABLE (;.e. ODE) H METAL CL 20. PONT.ALL GROUNDS THAT TRANSITS 1100 FROM BELOW GRADE TO ABOVE GRADES MUST BE#2BARE PROHIBITED TINNED LOCAL IN 13/4" NON-METALLIC, CONDUCTOR SHALL CONDUIT FROM 24'� BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3ITTO 6" OF CAD -WELD TERMINATION 21. BUILDINGS WHERE HREEXPOSED ENO OF THE CONDUIT 0 CT BE SEALED QUiRED SILICONE T B ROUTED CAULK. TO(ADD TRAGRADE. TON. E CONTRACTOR UND STANDARD IL WELLo M THE R P, TOWERS. AN WATER TOWERS GROUNDING RING. TO THE STING GROUNDNGISYS EM. THE GROODUNSNC CONDUCTORS ARE SHALL°NOT BE SMALLER THAN 2/0 COPPER. ROOFTOPLLGROUNDNG RING SHALL BE BONDEDDR TO THE EXISTING GRROUNDING SYSTEM, HE BUILDING STEEL COLUMNS. LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM. AND BUILDING MAIN WATER LINE (FERROUS OR NONFERROUS METAL PIPING ONLY). ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, NEC AND ALL APPLICABLE 2 DE5/OO510001 1 SHALL INSTALL CONDUITS 50 THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT 15 NOT BLOCKED AND P HAZARDS ARE ELIMI.TED. 3. WIRING( RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC_ 4.1. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BEAR THE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES LABEL OF APPROVAL, AND SHALL CONFORM TO REQ42 ALL REMENT OF THE O RGURRENT DEVICESN SHALL HAVE AN INTERRUPTING CURRENT RATING THAT SHALL BE ATIONAL EL THAN THE SHORT CIRCUR0000 THE TO WHICH THEY AVAILABLE SHORTS CIRCUIT CURRENT DO NOT EXCEED THE RATING OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT2IN ACCORDANCE WITH V ARTCLE10.24 NEC OR THE MOST CURRENT ES ADOPTED CODE PRE THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION. 5. EACH END OF EVERT POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR, GROUNDING CONDUCTOR, AND TELCA CONDUCTOR OR CABLE SHALL BE LABELED WITH COLOR -CODED INSULATION OR ELECTRICAL TAPE (3M BRAND, I 2" PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE WITH UV PROTECTION OR D.A. H SHALL CONFORM IDENTIFICATION METHOD SH CONFORM WRH NEC AND OSHA. 6. CONFIG 5 CLEARLY 1A p LAGS SHOW/NG THEIR RATED CONFIGURATION, L WIRE CONFIURA SHALL BE OR AMPACI, RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (i.e. PANEL EDAM AND D'S). PANEL BOARDS 510 NUMBERS) SHALL ALL TIE WRAPS D CU.NO TOOL TO ALL POWER ND 00000ENT GROUND WIRINGANRTUBNGOR CONDUIT SHALE V BE SINGLE COPPER CONDUCTOR (X14 OR LARGER) 1D L EQUIPMENT GROUND WRING LOCATED INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE COPPER CONDUCTOR (X6 OR LARGER) WITH SPECI I, RING N FLEXIBLE CORD SHALL BE MULTI -CONDUCTOR, TYPE 5000 CORD 10005000 000801400 OR LARGER) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. W 12 ABLE TRAY SHALL BE MULTECOMUCTOR, TYPE TC CABLE (X14 OR LARGER), WITH DPE POWER T - XEHWU XE -2. TRW, THW2. R W R -2 INSULATION UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 13 POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CRIMP -STYLE. COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRE NUTS BY THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND 14. RACEWAY AND CABLETRAY SHALL BE N BELISTEDUTS HO4 LABELED FOR ELECTRICALALL BE RATED FOR OPERATION USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOT LESS THAN 751 C 9NEMA. 0" C AVAILABLE). ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 19 ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), INTERMEDIATE METAL CONDOR (NC). OR RIGID METAL CONDUIT (FMC) SHALL BE USED FOR ELECTRICALEXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 16. METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR METAL -CLAD CABLE (MC) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 17. SCHEDULE40 PVC UNDERGROUND ON STRAIGHTS AND SCHEDULE 00 PVC FOR ALL ELBOWS/90s AND ALL APPROVED ABOVE GRADE PVC 16 FLEXIBLE M UIT (ODU1D-TITS FLEX) SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE VIBRATION 19 BONG Fl NGSELSH THREADED OR COMPRESSION -TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE LOCATION USED. SET SCREW 0.000SU ARE NOT 0 NAYS 20. CABINETS, BOXES AND WIRE WAYS SHALL BE LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, US ANSI/IEEE AND NEc. 21 SHALL BE METAL WITH AN ENAMEL FINISH AND INCLUDE A HINGED COVER. DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARDS (000000 (W SNECMDATE W AWAY). SLOTTED Ere (PANDUIT TYPE E OR EQUAL). SHALL BE FASTENED S AT 2 ES CONDUITS(1e TED)E FOR LINES OF THE STRUCTURE, MAINTAIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO E STRUCTURE AND KEEP CONDUITS IN TIGHT ENVELOPES. CHANGE IN DIRECTION TO ROUTE AROUND OBSTACLES SHALL BE MADE WITH CONDUIT OUTLET BODIES. CONDUIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A a NUT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER. PARALLEL DS PERPENDICULAR TO STRUCTURE WALL AND CEILING LINES. ALL CONDUIT SHALL DE 00000 TO CLUE OBSTRUCTIONS. ENDS OF CONDUITS SHALL BE TEMPORY CL MPEPED FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE TO PREVENT CONCRETE PIASTER IN DIRT FROM ENTERING. CONDUITS SHALL BE RIGIDLY CLAMPED N BOXES BY GALVANIZED MALLEABLE Ire SIDE AND CA IRON E OUTSIDE AND Iry 24. EEL.SEQUIPMENT CARNETS BUSHING 50, 0 GALVANIZED N0200 HALL ON 01 INSIDE. 4 COATED (0 SHALL MEET OR EXCEED SL 50 AM JUNCTION NEMA IP(OR BETTER) FOR INTERIORA�OCATIONS AM NEMA 3R (OR ET STEEL. 0 R LOCATIONS. 25. RECEPTACLE, 514A AND DEVICE B BE GALVANIZED, EPDXY -COATED OR AT004 A 0 000; SHALL M EET OR EXCEED U NEMA OS 1 D BE RATED ENEMA 1 (OR BETTEF) FOR INTERIOR LOCATIONS A. WEATHER PROTECTED (WP R BET. RE FOR 00. 50R LOCATIONS, 26. NM 1 (LI0 RECEPTACLE SWITCH AND LOCATIONS BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA 05E 2 (NEWEST EXTERIOR AM BE RATED NEMA 1 (ION BETTER) FOR 4011 D R L00TAINNs AND WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) FOR FOR CROWN N CASTLE 27 THE BEFOREENCO K ON AND OE AC BTAIN CD DISTRIBUTION PR FROM THE CARRIER AND/OR CROWN CASTLE USA INC 28. HE CONTRACTOR SHALLL PROVIDE NECESSARY TAGGING ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS 0 SAFEGUARD LIFE AND PROPERTY. 29. INSTALL 111 LABEL ON HE METER CENTER TO SHOW 'VERIZO 30. ALL EMPTY/SPAR/4101 4E CONDUITS THAT ARE INSTALLED ARE TO HAVE A METERED MULE TAPE PULL CORD INSTALLED. CO DUCTOR COLOR CODE LM PHASED BLACK 120/240V, 10 1 PHASE RED NEUTRAL WHITE GROUND GREEN A PHASE BLACK B PHASE RED "20/2000. 30 C PHASE BLUE NEUTRAL WHITE GROUND GREEN A PHASE BROWN 277/480V. 30 B PHASE ORANGE PHASE YELL NURPL_ NEUTRAL GREY GROUND GREEN PCS (4. RED" DC VOLTAGE NEC (-) BLACK" 00040002100(0)1) AND (2) POLARITY MARKED AT TERMINATION ABBREVIATIONS: T ANTENNA (E) EXISTING FIF FACILI, INTERFACE FRAME GEN GENERATOR MOBILErS GLOB, POSITIONING SYSTEM SM GLOB, LIE LONG TERM EVOLUTION as MASTER GROUND BAR W MICROWAVE (N) NEW NEc NAnonu ELECTRIC CODE (0) PROPOSED OUANTI, NT REC IER RBST HRADIO BASE STATION RET REMOTE ELECTRIC ELT RF�s RADIO FREQUENCY DATA SHEET RRH REMOTE RADIO HEAD REMOTE RADIO Er SIAp SMART INTEGRATED DEVICE TMA TowcR MouNTED AMPLIFIER TYP UMTS W.P. UNIVERSAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WORK PRIM APWA UNIFORM COLOR CODE: WHITE FIRE/POSED EXCAVATION TEMPORARY SURVEY MARKINGS MEM15000 POWER U CONDUIT, 4 0000T NG CABLES YELLOW GAS, OIL, STEAM, PETROLEUM, OR GASEOUS MATERIALS COMMUNICATION. ALARM 0 SIGNAL LINES, CA RBLES, OR CONDUIT AND TRAFFIC LOOPS MEEPOTABLE WATER sSIRE INc0TER, IRRIGATION, AND SEWERS AND DRAIN LINES verizonJ 180 WASHINGFLI\ 0 1.00E5 ROAD BEDMI\'S1 l 11, N1 0'/020 r 1 CROWN CASTLE Vv 13011 \1ACARTHUR BLVD, SMITE. 200 50AHWA,H, NJ 00470 \ 1 A TO\\'ER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 661-6351 TF8f11R h: 5'013,)+0159 V'IERTZON ST1E. NO 51131,R: 138524 Bl! #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-011 SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR: F cat, cN6TRUC11 . 11tsT 1 IT IS VIOLATION OF FuR ANY PER., A MIN.) PR1 iTI�"Sl n In 711,41.11 R 11!1+111 SHEET NUMBER: T-2 REVISION: 0 J (E) 135'-0' SELF SUPPORT (E) 770 BY OTHERS SITE PLAN a ,..2)SCALE a 7, (0) 9EBIZON 12. -2N32' —g. SHELTER (0) VERV20N 12'-2<O22"-5 GENERATOR ROOM" E) PAO.ST OTHERS a Ife'=l'-0 ('IL1';L,7r00) verizonv 18o \\ A,I11 NG[ON VALLEY ROAD 111, D,\IIN,STES NI (:'1921 a: CROWN CASTLE 12OII MACARTHUR BLVD. SUITE'_UI MAI IWAH, NJ 07430 A TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC. 27603 (919) 661-6351 'CEP JOB 0: 5'013- S159 VERTZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR: 1,20/22 1,11_11.1111,Itu SHEET NUMBER: C-1 r REVISION: 0 (0) VERIZON EQUIPMENT (1) ANDREW - DBXNH-65658-NM ANTENNA (2) ANDREW - pBXNHBNHH5B1 D45B ANTENNAS (2) COMMSCOPE - NTENNAS (4) C ANTENNAS: (2) RAY INSTALLED ON EXISTING MOUNTS.. NEW *02)00N EQUIPMENT (3) SAMSUNG - MT6407-772 ANTENNA (3) SAMSUNG - RF4439D-25A RRH (3) SAMSUNG - RF4440D-13A RRH (3) SIDE-BY-SIDE ANTENNA MOU.NG INSTALLED ON DUSTING MOUNTS *55120N EQUIPMENT 1 MOUNO4 L: 119 0" MOUNT Cl: 119'-0" TOWER 0ELEVATIONN 1\If/1 SCALE:. TOP OF APPURTENANCE EIFV. = 152'-D' HEIGHT DE 530415400 4 EXISTING MCL NEW VERR0N MCL & AOL EXISTING MGT ELEV. = EXISTING MCI EXISTINGo MCC 0 EXISTING MCL 9 EIEV 84'-0' EXISTING MCL ELEV. = 75'-O' EXISTI00 0001 h ELEV. '- EXISTING MCL 9 ELEV. = fi3'-0' T EXSTIN4 001 h ELE (E) 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT (E) VERRON FEEDLINES (8) COAX CA7510 (1-5/B") (2) HYBRID CABLE (6002) TOP 05 0E PLATE 9 ELEV. - 0'-0' e 1/167.0-010(11.11) ) (E) 002120N ANTENNA TO BE REMOVED COMMSCOPE - SBNHH-11/65C (2 TOTAL, 1 PER BETA AND GAMMA SECTOR) (E) VERIZON RRH TO BE REMOVED NOKIA - UHFA B25 RRH 9x30 (3 TOTAL 1 PER SECTOR) (E) VERIZON RRH TO BE REMOVED NOtIA - UNIT 13664 RRH 4x45 (3 TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR) (E) 00030N RRH TO BE REMOVED NOKI- UHBA B13 RRH 400 (3 TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR) (GAMMA) �- 207 021MI1TH (E) T -ARM MOUNT TO BE MODIFIED - (3 TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR) (E) VERIZUN ANTENNA TO BE RELOCATED - SBNHH-1D65C (4 TOTAL, 2 PER BETA AND GAMMA SECTOR) ,Z EXISTING ANTENNA PLAN SCALE (E) VEREON ANTENNA TO BE RELOCATED UT COMMSCOPE - SBLINH-1104513 (2 TOTAL, AL SECTOR) (ALLPHA) 4 ZIMUTH A3 (E 12041 ANTENNA TO BE RELOCATED :OPE - 0B00H-65658-VTM (2 TOTAL. 1 PER ALPHA AND GAMMA SECTOR). (E)0040VERIZON- 06-000-OUP33TO15-PT REMAI-40 05 8 (2 TOTAL) (ALPHA) ST AZIMUTH (E) VERIZON ANTENNA TO BE REMOVED (1 100*OPO - SBNHH-1TR (1 TOTAL. ON ALPHA SECTOR) (E) VERIZON AN GATED L, DBXNH TO (1 TOTAL, PON BETA SECTOR) INSTALLER NOTE: EX... AND PROPOSE, ANTENNA/ EQUIPMENT POSITIONING SHOWN PER REDS. FIELD CONDITIONS MAY VARY. TIE -BACK ARM NOTE. TIE -BACK ARMS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. TIE -BACK ARMS TO BE INSTALLED PER MOUNT MANUFACNRERS 0 ICADONs, A.0 ADHERING TO CROWN CASTE CED-STD-10294 STANDARD FOR INSTALLATION OF MOUNTS AND APPURTENANCES. TOWER ANALYSIS NOTES I, THE DESIGN DEPICT D IN THESE DRAWINGS IS MT WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY CORRESPONDING PASSING TOWER ANALYSIS. ION 2. R/G CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS G REVIEW TH TOWER ANALYSIS FORANY CONDITIONS E PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, 3, ANY REQUIRED TOW R MODIFICA➢ON DESIGN OR TOWER EPLACEMENT SHALL BE ` APPROVED BY TOR. r MOUNT ANALYSIS NOTES_ I. THE DESIGN DEPICT D IN THESE DRAWINGS IS VALID WHEN ACC MPANIED BY A CORRESPONDING PA SING MOUNT ANALYSIS. 2. CONSTRUCTION MAN GER/ 000060L A�ALN51S �0 Y CONDIl10Ns PR ORN TO INSTALLATION. 3. ANY REQUIRED MOU T MODIFICATION DESIGN OR MOUNT EPLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY E R. (N) VERIZON MODIFIED T -ARM MOUNT (3 TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR) LSUB 5G CDMA (N) VERIZON RRH SAMSUNG - RF4440D-1N (3 TOTAL, 1 PER .SECTOR) �i 25TA2IIMU10 (E) VERIZON RELOCATED ANTENNA COMMSCOPE PE - 5BNHH-1065( (4 TOTAL, 2 PER: BETA AND GAMMA SECTOR) 700/850 1900/LTE/ WS (N) *00120N RRN SAMSUNG - 0344390-200 700/850 (3 TOTAL 1 PER SECTOR) 1900/LTE/AWS B5 15056 5G 000/ 9 0/LT0/0E/AWS (ALPHA) 510 AZIMUTH ONEW ANTENNA PLAN SCALE' . r b 3 32., °o..(VL,=1;I> ) 70/850 1900/LTE/AW5 COMA (E) VERIZON SIDE -BY -510E ANTENNA MOUNONO BRACKET 400* COMMSCOPE - BSAMNT-SBS-1-2 (3 (3 TOTAL 1 PER SECTOR) (E) VERIZON RELOCATED ANTENNA COMMSCOPE - 5BNHH-10450 (2 TOTAL, ALPHA SECTOR) (N) VERIZON ANTENNA SAMSUNG - MT5901-T/A (3TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR) (ALPHA) 51' AZIMUTH LSUB6 SG BI 700/850 1900/LYE/AWS 700/850 1900/LYE/AWS (E) VERTZON "1000000. ANTENNA 002000030 - DBXNH-85650-000 (1 LOYAL, ON BETA SECTOR) verizonv 180 WASHINGS T,`. 1 _\LLEY ROAD BEDMIN'''] ] 11, \N 11121 a: CROWN CASTLE 1201) MACARTHUR BLVD, 0111T6. 200 MAHWAH, NI 00430 A 1 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 661-6351 00'0)040 #: 57013.»6159 VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-011 SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR 000 DATE CRC. DU'CRi0DON B.A. (T 10/2.27 GOP CONSTRUCT,. A4T 0 10/20/22 ATION PA, ANY PEI,C., SHEET NUMBER: C-2 REVISION: 0 verizoni 180 WASHING"1 ( 1\ 1 _ALLEY ROAD B0DAII\'''1 I 1i, \4I 117021 ANTENNA/RRH SCHEDULE SECTOR STATUS ANTENNA MANUFACTURER ANTENNA MWEL ANTENNA CENLERUNE AZIMUTH MECWNICA DOWNRLTS ELECPiMAL DOWRFILIS TOWER EQUIPLENT MANUFACTURES TOWER EQUIPMENT 076/MODEL EXI511NG COMMSCOPE 5DNHH-ID45B 119'-0" 5]' • SAMSUNG (1) 6744390-25A RRH A2 EXISTING COMMSCOPE SEISMS -1045E1 A3 - - - - - - - SAMSUNG (1) RF4140D-13A RRH Aa .1SP. COMMECOPE DDXNH-65650-VTM A5 NEW SAMSUNG 956407-775 119'-0" 57 • RATCAP (1) RXXOC-3315-PF-46 6-000 61 EXISTING COMMSCOPE SDNHH-ID65C 119'-0' 147 SAMSUNG (1) R74434D-255 RRN 02 EXISTING COMMSCOPE S6877 -1M. 119'-0" 147 • • - - 83 - - - - - - - SAMSUNG (1) RS44400-134 RRH 84 EXISTNG COMMECOPE OEMNH-85856-274 119'-0' 147 •- - 135 NEW SAMSUNG 976400-764 119'-0• 147 • • RAMCAP (1) 5410C-3315-PF-48 6-027 C1 EXISSNG COMMSCOPE 5BNHH-ID65C 119 -0 257 • ^ SAMSUNG (1) 6044390-254 RRN C2 EXISBNG COMMSCOPE 5580-17650 119.-0 257 ^ - - C3 - - - - - - - SAMSUNG (7) R744400-134 RRH C4 EXISTING COMMECOPE OEMS-65658-VTM 85 NSW SAMSUNG MTS002-TM 119'-0" 257 • •- - NOTE - NEW ANTENNA/EQUIPMENT SHOWN M BOLO • - CONTRACTOR TO REFERENCE MOST RECENT RFD5 FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DOWNIRTS OVERIZON TOWER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE CABLE SCHEDULE STATUS CABLE TYPE MANUFACTURER /) S� LENGTH CRT(MODEL EXISTING 2000 ANDREW (LDE7-SOA) 1-5/9" 169'-0"4 6 EXISTING HYBRID RES/CELWAVE H6156-I-Deus-ss31s 6X12 169'-0'3 2 TOTAL CABLE QTY: 8 LEG A� (0 2ERIZON 18200NE5 (6) COAX (1-5/6") (2) HYBRID CABLE (6012) OBASE LEVEL DETAIL SCALE'. NOT TO SCALE (E) 135'-0'• SELF SUPPORT (E) FEEDMNES 9Y OTHERS MP) CROWN CASTLE 1201) MAC.ARTHUR BLVD, SUITE 200 M01I\GAIT, NJ 27430 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 661-6351 1744 JOB 0: 5701.770159 VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-011 SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR RI, V I.i. _,__ 161 1,,CRT 1. DI>bJRA l.,', II LTUS ASv 1 1,20,2 MK, NWT SHEET NUMBER: C-3 REVISION: 0 _-, I f ." • N \ _- L- NOTES_ - BSAMNT-SES-1-2 KIT CONTAINS MDUNRNO BRACKETS. - TORQUE THE MID BOLT ASSEMBLY PER MANUFACRIRE'S RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMSCOPE - - PIPE BRACKETS 2° TO (z) 627281 VERIZON TO D7 858MNT-SOS-1-2 ,I BRACKETS \ 7 DOWNRLT ,7 aRACKETs. MOUNT ANTENNA 4° SCH 40 CALV. N.m. - BSAMNT-SBS-1-2 I • / I 1 MOUNTING PIPE MAST PIPE I I Tt NOT USED verizoni 180 \G'ASHING 1 (. G. )' TITLES: ROAD BEDMI\"I I I., NI :021 a:CROWN 0 CASTLE 20N MACARTHUR BLVD, SUITE. 200 TOWER G 1 PROFESSIONALSON 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 66t-6351 TE2100#:57020.772159 J SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 2 SCALE: NOT To SCALE • 'INSTALLER NOTES ISSUED FOR: ALIT PIPES BRACKETS AND MIASCELLANEDUS HARDWARE TO GALVANIZED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. J RRY (I. t8N Ir VIII - - IU280 I,i. _.i,__ uBl I, INTNI iT Irt� A4T NEW RRH END -01585A 1 III � O MOUNTING .,...,,- III ANTENNA PI BRARRH/CHE'f� _— - & RRH MOUNTING , � , DETAIL ANTEN MOUNTING PIPE \/ O r- - _ y 1 NEE n t T-n,-2 /./��� 1 J f ,,,,J 0 N. O SAMSUNG - EP97-01585A BRACKET DETAIL SHEET NUMBER: C —4 REVISION! 0 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE verizoni 8 1 VIII III i11111 1111 Ills 1 tr I... on., I • - SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS - 1116407-770 ANTENNA WEIGHT: 81.57 LBS SIZE (HxWxD): 35.06,1646x551 IN. SAMSUNG - MT6407-77A Q SCALE: NOT TO SCALE FIBER NAMING CONVENTION Technology (Equipment-Sector-OPTI II) DUPLDL FIBER RUN 5GmmW LO 55mmW-A-D SIMPLEX FIBER RUN COBS. LD CBRS-A-iI CBRS Ll CBRS-A-1 LAA LO IAA -A-0 High Band Dual Band LO HB-A-0 High Band Dual Band 11 HB-A-1 LOW Band Dual Band 10 LB -A-0 FDMIMO AWS 10 FDM-AWS-A-0 FDMIMO AWS Ll FDM-AWO-A-1 FDMIMO PCS LO FDM-PCS-A-0 FDMIMO PCS Ll FDM-PCS-A-1 Rev. 2/23/2021 FIBER NAMING CONVENTION CHART ,.± SCALE: NOT TO SCALE NOT USED 44 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SAMSUNG - RF4439D-25A WEIGHT: 76.7 LBS SIZE (H,WxO): 14.96%14.96X19.04111. OSAMSUNG - 994439D -25A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 3 NOT USED SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SAMSUNG - RE44400-13A WEIGHT: 70.33 IBS SIZE (HxWx0): 14.96%14.96X9.05 IN. ©SAMSUNG — RF4440D-13A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 180 WASHING"111`. 1 _\LLEY ROAD BEDN1NS'11 I;, \41 47421 CROWN v CASTLE 4CARTHUR BLVD), SUITE 200 MAHWAH, NJ 07430 1 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 661-6351 TM' JOB 4: 5701.779159 VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR RAY DATE "RCM `- 30 1 F6./4A 0 10/20/22 GU9 C6R6TNUCTON AST 1 1,20,2 SHEET NUMBER: C-5 REVISION: 0 verizoni 180 WASHING" \LLEY ROAD BEDMIN S 1 1 1i, \ 1117121 a: CROWN CASTLE 1201 MACARTHUR BLVD. SUITE 200 MAHWAH, NJ 07430 Sector - Line# Sector 700 LTE 850 LTE AWS PCS CBRS 850 COMA Alpha -Line1 White Yellow Light Blue Gray Alpha-Line2 White Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue .'r : Gray Gray Alpha -Line3 ISMEME 1== - Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue rple Da i - -- Gray Gray Alpha-Line4 Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue urple Dark •r -. -: i Gray Gray Beta-Unel Yellow Light Blue ; urple I Gray Beta-Line2 Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue •- rk Purple Dark Purple Gray Gray Beta -Linea Green -- .. ,•'nk Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue •a kPurple Dark P s_ Gray Gray Beta-Line4 .-k Pfr 'AlYellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue - ...Purple Dark Gray Gray Gamma -Li nel Venn*, Light Blue urple Gray Gamma-Line2 Green Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue o=k Purple Dark Pur.' - Gray Gray Gamma -Li ne3 Green. --- -, Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue !...kPurple DarkPur•_.. Gray Gray Gamma-Line4 Pink 'Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Gray Gray to-Linel White White Yellow Light Blue Gray Delta-Line2 White White Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue `: Gray Gray Delta -Linea White White Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Dark Purple Dark Purpl Gray Gray Delta-Line4 Epsilon-Line1 White -- Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue urple Dark Purpl. .'.-- Gray Gray Yellow Light Blue .urple 1 Gray Epsilon-Line2 Epsilon -Linea Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue •orple Dark Purple Gray Gray Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue _Prole Dark Pur a. " Gray Gray Epsilon-Line4 Zeta-Line1 Green Green Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Gray Gray Gray Zeta-Line2 Green Green Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Gray Gray :118-Line3 Green IMMM IMEM --- _-- 11 Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue Gray - Gray Gray Zeta-Line4 GPS-Linel IGPS-Line2 Green Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Light Blue Light Blue Light Blue GPS-line3 GPS-Line4 OCOLOR CODE MATRIX 1 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE A TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC. 27603 (919) 661-6351 TM' JOB 8; 570(.»9159 VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #1 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR 850 DATE 1097,14 058t0mncm 85.5J4n o 10/20/22 cme CONSTRUCTION rvsv r 11 V11,ATIoN 1_, Full ANY PE1,1, SHEET NUMBER: C-6 REV1010n: 0 A/0: DBXNH-6505&VrM B: 00350-85858-VTM MT640T-T7A� n77 Ant/ RRH TowerfWalertanki Rooftop Equipment Pad 1 a L�4 BSAMNTSBS-1-2 sBNHH AS NS 0 0 SBNHH O o (. 0 0 • 05/513003-4344408-138 0. 0• 02/0660 RRH- R 44390-254 1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 60VP Box i 1 • Port 1 & 2 are for low band (698-896 MHz). • Port 3,4,5, & 6 are for high band (1695-2360 MHz). • Smart Bias Tee (SRI) is through port 1 & 3 for low band and port 1 for high band. • AISG able is only needed when drawn In the diagrams below, if H Is not drawn then SST Is enough to control all RET moron. • Not all SOT ports are needed to control RET, only green port connection to green port will control RET. " aunt Icon w n s.nl.•nw In AISG Cable H RET DC signal pass for RET (Port that will control RET) Hybdaex cables Comments: Diagram shows antenna port configuration as viewed from below antennas. Antenna positions are indicated as viewed from IN FRONT of antennas. Cap and weatherproof unused antenna ports. All plumbing diagram colors are irrelevant except for AISG & Hybriflex cable. (For the coax colors follow Coax Colors guide above( verizoni 1811 WASHING" \ _\LLES ROAD 85044(01'] 1 0, NI 5,21 CROWN v CASTLE 1200 h1ACARTHUR BLVD, SUITE 200 MAINC \} I, NI 07430 A 1 TOR1 ER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC. 27603 (919) 661-6351 TEPID,' 8; 57011,»9159 VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 PXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR Pis - 'tION UP LIW FJB i�Y CEluO�. I to ALTEATlESCH,"I, • SHEET NUMBER: C-7 181,0101()N/ 0 TO ANTENNA CO4X COPPER/GPLVANIZED GROUND BAR 0000 o00.0a00o000000® 010 HOLE LONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUG (TYR) NOTFS; 1. DOUBLING UP "OR STACKING" OF CONNECTIONS IS NOT PERMITTED. 2. EXTERIOR ANTIOXIDANT JOINT COMPOUND TO BE USED ON ALL EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS. 3. GROUND BAR SHALL NOT BE ISOLATED FROM TOWER. MOUNT DIRECTLY TO ANTENNA MOUNT STEE,.. ,� ANTENNA SECTOR GROUND BAR DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TO TOWER MOUNTED EQUIPMENT (lYP) AN END RAT „EX (BO DED TO STEEL) COAX GROUND BAR WITH INSULATORS. BONDED DIRECTLYTO hiE BOTTOM OF TOW. S TEELHARDWARE. ENOTE EI MECHANICAL CONNECTION (TYR) 2/0 COPPER WRE NOTES: TO ANTENNA STANDARD COAX CABLE GROUND KIT (TYP) 06 STRANDED CU WIRE WITH GREEN. 600V. THWN INSULATION (OR AS PROVIDED WITH GROUND KR) (NRI OAX CABLE (MP FOR ALL) MG 2 HOLE LUG (TYP) TO BIS TRAY EQUIPMENT BRIDGE Vu GRO UND �-�--T (NOTE 3)wIRE EXOTHERMIC WELD (TYR) 1 NUMBER OF GROUNDING BARS MAY VARY DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF TOWER. ANTENNA LOCATIONS AND CONNECTION ORIENTATION. COAXIAL CABLES EXCEEDING 200 FEET ON THE TOWER SHALL HAVE GROUND KITS AT THE MIDPOINT, PROVIDE AS REOUIREO. 2. ONLY MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS ARE ALLOWED TO NE MADE T0. CROWN CASTLE USA INC. TOWERS. ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE TREATED WITH AN ANTI -OXIDANT COATING. 3. ALL TOWER G SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RECOGNIZED EDITION OF ANSI IAN 22 AND NEPA 780. 4 TYPICAL ANTENNA CABLE GROUNDING SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TO NNA CO COPPER/GALVANIZED GROUND BAR 00 (00000000000000000 0`00 0050u200011100 /0000070 TWO HOLE LONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUG 000000 GRING (2 ttP. FOR �.P) BOTTOM ROUND BAR ONLY) 1. EXTERIOR ANTIOXIDANT JOINT COMPOUND TO BE USED ON ALL EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS 2. GROUND 603 SHALL NOT BE ISOLATED FROM TOWER. MOUNT DIRECTLY TO TOWER STEEL (TOWER ONLY). 3. GROUND BAR SHALL BE ISOLATED FROM BUILDING 0R SHELTER. OTOWER/SHELTER GROUND BAR DETAIL SCALE, NOT TO SCALE -HOLE CRIMP/ COMPRESSION CONNECTOR STAINLESS STEEL BELLVLLE WASHEFE (TYR) STAINLESS STEEL 6011 (TYP) STAINLESS STEEL FLIT WASHER (NP) GROUND BAR STAINLESS STEEL FIAT WASHER (TYP) STAINLESS STEEL NUT (TYP) SINGLE CONNECTOR AT GROUND BARS DRAGON TOOTH WASHER (TYP) 0-15g= CONNECTR CONNECTOR STAINLESS' STEEL. BELLVILLE WASHER (T.) SINGLE CONNECTOR AT STEEL OBJECTS 2 -HOLE CRIMP/ COCOMPNRENECTORSSION STAINLESS STEEL BOLT STAINLESS STEEL FLAT WASHER STEEL STAINLESS STEEL SELF -DRILLING METAL SCREW (TYP) DRAGON ASTOOTH (NP) SINGLE CONNECTOR AT METALLIC/STEEL OBJECTS STAINLESS STEEL (TYP) STAINLESS STEEL NUT (03R) STAINLESS STEEL FIAT WASHER METALLIC OBJECT 5 HARDWARE DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS 5 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE T/FINISH GRADE 8" PVC PLUG 8E PVC PLUG CPLG. (0700.) #2 SOUD (TEST 0.00P) NOTCH SIDES OF 8" PVC 5CH 40 PIPE TO ALLOW EXIT/ENTRANCE OF GROUND RING WIRE TRENCH BOTTOM 2/O TINNED CU EXTERNAL CADWELD TEST LOOP TO L TOWER GROUND RING WIRE GROUND RING WIRE NOTE: I 5/8" 0 x 101-0" LONG COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD 1. GROUND 300 SHALL BE DRIVEN VERTICALLY, NOT TO EXCEED 45 DEGREES FROM THE VERTICAL 2. GROUND WIRE SHALL BE MIN: 30" BE OW GRADE OR 6" BELOW FROST LINE_ (WHICH EVER IS GREATER). AS PER N E.C. ARTICLE 250-50(D) OINSPECTION WELL DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE EXOTHERMIC WELD 6" WIDE METALLIC HTEL WARNING/LOCATOR TAPE AT . ( GROUND RING 02 COPPER WIRE SOU. TINNED FOR CARRIER AND ICE BRIDGE GROUND GROUND RING 2/0 FOR TOWER. GROUND LOOP GROUND ROD COPPER CLAD STEEL ROD 5/8 0 x IO - N 0" LONG NOTES 1. GROUND R00 SHALL BE DRIVEN VERTICALLY, NOT TO EXCEED 45 DEGREES FROM THE VERTICAL 2. GROUND WIRE SHALL BE MIN. 30" BELOW GRADE OR fi BELOW FROST LINE. (WHICH EVER IS GREATER) AS PER N.E.C. ARTICLE 250-50(D) O6 GROUND ROD DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE verizoni 180 WASFENG"1T O. 1 _ALLEY 120,3.13 BEDM1111 I I IL, NI 1,921 CROWN v CASTLE 1300 h1ACARTHUR BLVD, SUITE 200 MAZIW'ALL NJ 07430 A 1 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 66t-6351 TEP1(TR #: ST013.»8159 \'P.RILON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-071 SELF SUPPORT ♦ ISSUED FOR: RPV UNTE 4. ♦ SHEET NUMBER: G-1 REVISION: 0 TYPE VA' TYPE HS TYPE 2-10-2 TYPE VN TYPE VR TYPE XA TYPE 00-2 TYPE GY TYPE NC 1701 5< TYPE GR TYPE PT TYPE GT" NOSE: 1. 00100 EXOTHERMIC 'MOLD TYPES" SHOWN HERE ARE EXAMPLES. CONSULT WITH CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR SPECIFIC DS TIP Bo 21 1 B s BELOW 2 MOLD E ONLY TO BE USED RAGE WHEN CONNECTING GROUND RING TO GROUND ROD. O CADWELD GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE WEATHERPROOFING KIT (SEE NOTE 3) ANTENNA CABLE 66 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR). SEE NOTE 1 & 2 CABLE GROUND GR (TYPICALLY) ' TO 24" 120 MAX. -S CABLE CONNECTOR NOTES; I DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BAR. GROUNDING NR SHALL BE TYPE AND PART NUMBER AS SUPPLIED OR RECOMMENDED BY CABLE MANUFACTURER. 3. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE TWO-PART TAPE KR, COLD SHRINK SHALL NOT BE USED. CABLE GROUND KIT CONNECTION. 1�.5/15CALE: NOT TO SCALE --"Nr WALL BRACKET LOCK WASHER P/N(*1 3/0H11x1 TAMPER ESSTANT BOLT (TYP) INSULATORS SEE NOTE 2. (OP) 1W0 -HOLE COMPRESSION LUG UNIVERSAL COPPER GROUND BAR (4"x20") NOTES: 1. DOWN TLLED (HOME RUN) ER THE GROUNDING A TORS RE IN112 TO BE INSTALLED POLICY ONCROWN O CRCWN CASTLE MODIFICATIONUSA INC. NO O DRILLING TO TOWER STEEL IS ALLOWED WN CONDUCTORIN ANY FORM OR FASHION, CAD -WELDING ON THE TOWER AND/OR IN THE AIR ARE NOT PERMITTED. 2. OMN INSULATOR WHEN MOUNTING TO TOWER STEEL OR PLATFORM STEEL USE INSULATORS WHEN ATTACHING TO BUILDING OR SHELTERS. ©GROUND BAR DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TO ANTENNAS. C00X JUMPER (701 CONNECTOR WEATHERPROOFING' .KIT (T.. SEE NOTE 2) ANTENNA CABLE TO EMS EQUIPMENT (OP.) WEATHERPROOFING KIT GROUND KIT (TYP) 40 AWG COPPER/GALVANIZED COAX GROUND BAR BONDED DIRECTLY TOWER NOTES, 1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND. WIRE DOWN TO ANTENNA GROUND BAR. 2. WEATHER PROOFING SHALL BE TWO-PART TAPE KN. COLD SHRINK SHALL NOT BE USED. GROUND. CABLE CONNECTION 4 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE NOTE: MINIMUM OF /S NUT 3 THREADS TO ER (TYP) VISIBLE (OP) 2 HOLE LONG BARREL TINNED SOLID GOIREg (TYP) RN COATED SOLID COPPER BUS BAR CHERRY INSULATOR INSTALLED IF REQUIRED OLUG DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE W/5 SPLITA (010) 5/5 FLAT WASHER (TYP) WASHER T (TYP) S/S BOLT (TYP) WIRE SIZE BURNDY LUG BOLT SIZE 60 AWG GREEN INSULATED 1060-21030 3/8' - 10 NC S 2 BOLT 42 AWG. 0002 NNNED 0030-21038 3/0" - 16 NC 5 2 BOLT $2 :AWG STRANDED 0020-2TC38 0/8" - 16 NC S 2 BOLT 62/0 AWG STRANDED YA28-20030 3/B' - 18 NC S 2 BOLT 6'4/O AWG STRANDED 28-2N BURN DT GROUND WG W/ LONG BARREL (SEE CHART) 1/2" - 16 NC S 2 BOLT HEAT SHRINK (CLEAR) NUT GROUNDING (,P)� rCONDUCTOR LOCK WASHER GROUND BAR BOLT ((101) SEE CHART) BURN TWO HOLE LUG W/ LONG BARREL (SEE CHART) BARE WIRE TO BE NO-. AT BOTH ENDS STRANDED (GREEN INSULATED) ONLY FOR: N8 AWG (EE CHART) NOM, 1. ALL GROUNDING LUGS INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. L ALL HARDWARE BO LOCK WASHERS SHALL BE STAINLESS HARDWARE ARE TO BE AS FOLLOWS: BOLT. FLAT WASHER,GROUND BARE GROUND LUG, FLAT WASHER AND NUT. 2 MECHANICAL LUG CONNECTION SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 46 AWG MIN. FROM ANTENNA O GABLE RDUND KR GROUND BAR ON SHELTER. ICE BRIDGE, OR ON ANTENNA TOWER "TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BARE CONDUCTOR WIRE TO BUILDING SERVICE GROUND OR GROUND RING GROUNDWIRE INSTALLATION SCALE: NOT TO SCALE GROUNDING SHALL BE ELIMINATED WHEN GROUND BAR 5 ELECTRICALLY BONDED TO METAL TOWER 62 TINNED SOLID IN 0/0 LIQUID TIGHT CONDOR FROM 24" BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3. TO 6" F CAD -WELD TERMINATION POINT. EXPOSED END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED NCH SILICONE CAULK. CADWELD (.0) TIE INTO EXISTING GROUND RING OTRANSITIONING GROUND DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE verizoni 1011 WASHING"I T `. 1 _ALLEY ROAD BEDN11N' I I., \2I 11:021 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS A 1 326 TRYON RD RALEIGH, NC 27603 (919) 66t-6351 T010)0)R #:47013.»8159 J VERIZON SITE NUMBER: 138524 BU #: 806690 CCD BREWSTER 959497 1657 MAIN ST BREWSTER, MA 02770 EXISTING 135'-0" SELF SUPPORT ISSUED FOR NOV DEME DRS, 3C 1- 110./53) 0 10/20/22 GBP CONSTRUCT,. AST r 10/211/22 VON ILA G PER AM SHEET NUMBER: G-2 REVISION: 0 FINAL Select Bd Appt Policy; version Oct. 28 Appendix C SELECT BOARD COMMITTEE APPLICATION SCREENING FORM Applicant Name Requested Committee 1. TOWN CLERK REVIEW a. Applicant is a registered Brewster voter: Yes No b. Date confirmed 2. SELECT BOARD LIAISON RECOMMENDATION TO SELECT BOARD a. Select Board Liaison Applicant Interview: i. Interviewer name (Select Board Liaison): ii. Interview date: b. Select Board Liaison Consultation with Committee Chair: iii. Committee Chair name: iv. Consultation date: v. Did Committee Chair also interview applicant? Yes No c. Was at least 1 Brewster reference contacted: Yes No N/A d. Select Board Liaison Recommendation: i. Recommend appointment. ii. Recommend appointment to other committee that is a better fit for applicant qualifications. iii. Recommend holding application for future opening. iv. Not recommended. 3. SELECT BOARD ACTION a. At a Select Board meeting held , the Applicant was appointed to for a term ending year term. 4. NOTIFICATION OF APPOINTEE AND TOWN CLERK a. Date notification of appointment sent to appointee and Town Clerk: Appendix B Town of Brewster SELECT BOARD COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT DIRECTIONS: • Thank you for your interest in serving Brewster. The Town aims to match applicants with committee service best aligned to your skills and interests as well as the committee's needs. • The Town may consider the information in this application, any supplemental information, and any other publicly available information. An appointment to any committee. board or commission is at the discretion of the Select Board. • Please complete this form online, or on paper, and submit a resume if desired to Erika Mawn, Town Administrator's Executive Assistant: o Email: o Mail: Erika Mawn, 2198 Main St., Brewster, MA 02631, or o In person: Town Administrator's Office or drop -box outside Town Hall. • After your application materials are received, you'll be contacted regarding next steps. Vacancies will be filled by applicants deemed best qualified to serve in a particular capacity, which discretion lies solely with the appointing authority. Submitting this form does not guarantee appointment. 1 Applicant name: Jan Crocker 2. Address: 3. Phone Numbers: Home: 4. Email: 5. This is an application for: Cell: x Full member status Alternate status 6. Are you a full-time Brewster resident? Ix ( Yes No 7, Years you've lived in Brewster: 8. Are you registered to vote in Brewster? x I Yes 1 No 9. Committees you are interested in serving on in order of preference: a Cultural Council b. 25 G NOTE: You may attach a resume or CV instead of completing items 10-14. 10. EDUCATION. List schools attended, degrees/diplomas/certificates received, and date of completion. Name of School Degree/Diplomas Certificates Date of Completion Ohio Wesleyan University IB.F.A. 1972 Northern Essex Community (Entrepreneurial Training course (2009 11.00CUPATION: museum professional x 1 Active Retired 1 Not currently working 12. EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE. List employers, job titles and dates of employment for at least previous 3 years. Name of Employer Edward M. Kennedy Institute Job Title ;Senior Exhibit Developer Dates of Employment 12017-2021 Golden Ball Tavern Gore Place Ilnterpretive Planning consultant Interpretive Planning consultant 12022 2021 -present 13.GOVERNMENT POSITIONS. List any Town of Brewster or other government volunteer, elected, or appointed positions you now hold or have held. • jmember of Brewster Pond Planning Committee • • • caseworker for US. Representative Congressman Gerry E. Studds 14.COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES. List all civic, non-profit, or other organizations that you belong to or have belonged to in the previous 5 years: a. Organizations and dates: 1Co-founder of The Civics Workshop Inc. IAmerican Alliance of Museums !New England Museum Association 15.GOALS: Please explain why you'd like to serve on a particular committee. to ensure young residents get exposed to and trained in the arts in order to develop skills, confidence, and paths to future education along with creating new opportunities for public art, performance, poetry, and all other forms of expression. 16. EXPERIENCE & SKILLS: Please list any experience, achievements, skills, or interests you have that would assist you to serve effectively on the committee you wish to serve on. have a B.F.A. in design. [I was a dancer for over 40 years and performed with the Ipswich Moving Company and Liz Lerman Dance Exchange Curated exhibits with artists at Heritage Museums & Gardens, Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, and the Museum of Science, Boston Artist/Mentor for ArtWorks program at Heritage Museums & Gardens 17.TOWN EMPLOYMENT: Are you or any member of your immediate family employed by or receiving financial consideration from the Town of Brewster? Yes x No 18.CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Do any of your activities or relationships present the possibility or probability of a conflict of interest if you are appointed?(Does not automatically disqualify but may need to be disclosed) 1 Yes IM No 19. LOCAL REFERENCES: Please provide the names and contact information for references (Brewster residents preferred): a. Name: Monica Bushnell Address: Phone: Email: Relationship to you:lfnena, former co-worKe: b. Name: Katie Gregoire Address: Phone: Email: Relationship to you: co -member of Brewster Pond Planning Committee 20.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Please add any additional information you'd like. I grew up in Brewster where I was lucky to be immersed in the arts through all kinds of activities including dance, acting, painting, and music. I know how significant the arts has been in my life and my career as well as how creative thinking was cultivated throughout my life. I would like to give back to my town and make sure kids like me find meaningful connections to the arts and creativity. 20.SIGNATURE. By signing below, you state that you understand and agree. • My completion of this form does not guarantee my appointment and my application will be kept on file for two (2) years. • If appointed to a position, I will be considered a Municipal Employee under MGL Ch. 268A and will be subject to: • Massachusetts Conflict of Interest Law, MGL Ch. 268A; • Massachusetts Financial Disclosure Law, MGL Ch. 268B; • Massachusetts Open Meeting Law, MGL Ch. 30A, Sections 18-25, and the implementing regulations, 940 CMR 29.00; • Massachusetts Public Records Law, MGL Ch. 66, and the implementing regulations, 950 CMR 32.00; • Massachusetts Campaign Finance Law, MGL Ch. 55; and • Brewster Charter, when in force, and Town bylaws, and all other applicable federal, state, and local laws or regulations. • If appointed, I must be sworn in by the Town Clerk before serving, and I will complete State Conflict of Interest training after appointment, as well as any other certifications required by law. • When submitted, I understand that this form becomes a public document. Signature: /j_ Date: dr-1,4. /e; 0-eLZ The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Town of Brewster To Jan Crocker We, the Selectmen of Brewster by virtue of the authority in us vested by the laws of the Commonwealth, do hereby appoint you to the Cultural Council for a 3-year term, expiring June 30, 2025 Given at Brewster this 5th day of December 2022  Recorded A.D.   Attest:Town Clerk   TO: Brewster Select Board FROM: Brewster Fire/Rescue Association CC: Fire Chief Moran Town Administrator Peter Lombardi DATE: 11/21/22 RE: Request to Utilize Town Equipment The Brewster Fire/Rescue Association will be participating in Homeless for the Holidays from December 7-11. We will be camping out for 103 hours during this time frame at the Immaculate Conception Church, located at 2584 Main St Brewster.We will be collecting new unwrapped toys, non-perishable food items and monetary donations. All collected food will be donated to Our Lady of the Cape Food Pantry. All required insurance and logistics to host the event have been secured by the Association. At this time we are requesting Select Board approval for use of the Town’s light tower and sign board to assist in providing lighting, heat, and messaging services during the event. We thank you for considering this request and look forward to a successful event that will provide food, toys, and funding to local families and children in need. Board of Selectmen Town Administrator 2198 Main Street Brewster, Massachusetts 02631-1898 (508) 896-3701 FAX (508) 896-8089 APPLICATION FOR ONE -DAY LIQUOR LICENSE (must be submitted with application fee two (2) weeks prior to the date of the event) Applicant's Name: C Applicant's Address: Type of Event: 2 d col --4(L. Phone: t� 't9 - ! FO (For CII1C'e) Location arcd,Address where 7 i uo w 11 be served if differe: Do roe - �� 44a from Applicant's Address: Date d que sted fo Licensed Authoriza '.on to serve Li uor Day: 23,t'. • 20 Times: (o Types of Liquor to be nerved: ✓ Will food be provided2 ' O Number of attendees ipated? Who will serve the lic r? Name: J 'lie, Pt'11l✓4 Address: 3),99' 9' 4/7 47 0' 3u Contact phone number(s) for Server(s): qc111- 03L.0 FEE= $35/day/location Sig tur /kyl W: /M1 -A c , Signature indicating for Licensing Authority's Approval: Date: l itgi-�" / o Date Applicant's Name: C Applicant's Address: 00111111/110/0/ laickE / 04,6E 9 _± ry'•.wa �,�s'0 //i����///llllllltfl p I I l I IU11111ti1��� Board of Selectmen Town Administrator 2198 Main Street Brewster, Massachusetts 02631-1898 (508) 896-3701 FAX (508) 896-8089 APPLICATION FOR ONE -DAY LIQUOR LICENSE (must be submitted with application fee two (2) weeks prior to the date of the event) ed-,Asz, Type of Event: Pie r f(�r V iii (, lc Phone: 0 rEl Location ar;cd,A.ddress where I„ uo w 11 be served if differreettfrom Applicant's Address: Da roe - ) (2,61c, Date hours requested for Licensed Authorization to serve Liquo. Day: �C0/ 2-0 A7 Times: DO T: ,IU Types of Liquor to be served: Jeer « LAS Will food be provided? ,eo Number of attendees ipated? � 1-3 Who will serve the 1ic r? , Name: J /1//le. P'.€2././L1_ Address: 3)T ci' 44( V, 41 -1(5-1-- Contact phone number(s) for Server(s): y71 q� -91- 03LO FEE= $35/day/location Signature o App 'c t: 1 `lrJ ll�/ Date: Signature indicating for Licensing Authority's Approval: Date 21 OA* � -0s. n ( I1:Lj mar > Grr? 1101 peecaretto ///////11111111111110 Board of Selectmen Town Administrator 2198 Main Street Brewster, Massachusetts 02631-1898 (508) 896-3701 FAX (508) 896-8089 APPLICATION FOR ONE -DAY LIQUOR LICENSE (must be submitted with application fee two (2) weeks prior to the date of the event) Applicant's Name: C v i �� �- Phone: _ Applicant's Address: Type of Event: Pe f rOf 141 CI vie Location ancd7Address where I ,iquo w 11 be served if different from Applicant's Address: 00roe - ,) A .)t Date an' ours requested for Licensed Authoriza ion to serve Day: C // ,,2 Times: / Types of Liquor to be served: Will food be provided? Number of attendees . ipated? Who will serve the lipejf? Name: Ji e v Address: quo �3 Contact phone number(s) for Server(s): / 9�/— o3)1/ FEE= $35/day/location Signature of A lic Date: I Signature indicating for Licensing Authority's Approval: 21922. Date Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 Fax: (508) 896-8089 NUMBER 2021-ODL – 46 2022-ODL-#54 FEE $35.00 Town of Brewster Local Licensing Authority This is to certify that: Cape Rep Theatre IS HEREBY GRANTED A ONE-DAY LIQUOR LICENSE PERMT TO ALLOW: Beer and Wine To be served during a performance At the following address: 3299 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 This one-day permit is effective: Friday December 9, 2022 from 6:30pm to 9:30pm Date Issued: December 5, 2022 Local Licensing Authority: ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Conditions: A barrier or signage should clearly delineate where people are permitted to consume the alcohol served. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 Fax: (508) 896-8089 NUMBER 2021-ODL – 46 2022-ODL-#55 FEE $35.00 Town of Brewster Local Licensing Authority This is to certify that: Cape Rep Theatre IS HEREBY GRANTED A ONE-DAY LIQUOR LICENSE PERMT TO ALLOW: Beer and Wine To be served during a performance At the following address: 3299 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 This one-day permit is effective: Saturday December 10, 2022 between 6:30pm and 9:30pm Date Issued: December 5, 2022 Local Licensing Authority: ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Conditions: A barrier or signage should clearly delineate where people are permitted to consume the alcohol served. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 Fax: (508) 896-8089 NUMBER 2021-ODL – 46 2022-ODL-#55 FEE $35.00 Town of Brewster Local Licensing Authority This is to certify that: Cape Rep Theatre IS HEREBY GRANTED A ONE-DAY LIQUOR LICENSE PERMT TO ALLOW: Beer and Wine To be served during a performance At the following address: 3299 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 This one-day permit is effective: Sunday December 11, 2022 between 1:30pm and 4:30pm Date Issued: December 5, 2022 Local Licensing Authority: ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Office of: Select Board Town Administrator Conditions: A barrier or signage should clearly delineate where people are permitted to consume the alcohol served. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov To: Brewster Select Board as Local Licensing Authority From: Erika Mawn Date: November 29, 2022 RE: Renewal of Annual Liquor Licenses for 2023 Each year the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (ABCC) requires the Town of Brewster to complete the annaul license renewal process. This is a two-step process that first requires the licensees to apply to renew their license by signing their application before November 30th and submitting payment to the Town. It is then the Local Licensing Authority’s responsibility to vote on the renewal of the licenses which are contingent on compliance with all other local permits and regulations. All licensees have signed their application in the month of November as required and have submitted payment for their 2023 license. For those retail establishments that require a certificate of liability (Hotel/Innkeeper, Club, and Restaurants) we have received the appropriate documentation, and this will be on file with the Town Administrator’s office. The Tax Collector’s office has reviewed the financial obligations of each establishment, any establishment that has outstanding taxes will not have their annual liquor license renewed until payment is received. The Health Department did not have any concerns with any of the establishments that they permit. The Police Chief has also reviewed the list of establishments and there are no concerns at this time. The Building Department is completing their annual inspections in coordination with the Fire Department, any establishment that does not pass their annual inspection will not receive their annual liquor license until cleared by the Building Department. For licenses that are approved by the Local Licensing Authority, the renewal application and supporting documents will be submitted to the ABCC no later than January 23, 2023. Office of: Select Board Town Administrator RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION GUIDELINES Without exception, all annual alcoholic beverages licensees are required to renew their alcoholic beverages license by November 30th of each year. All retail license renewal applications must be signed by an authorized corporate officer, individual or partner and filed with the Local Licensing Authority between November 1st and November 30th. Licensees who are in the process of transferring their licenses are required to file the renewal application until the transfer has occurred and they are no longer the licensee of record. Licensees are responsible for correcting any differences between their files and the ABCC license file on the renewal application in red ink. An LLA Certification Form / Form 43 verifying these changes have been ABCC approved must be attached to the license renewal application in order to change the official ABCC license file. Please mail those corrections along with the renewal packet to the ABCC. All on-premises M.G.L. c. 138, §12 licensees must provide proof of the required liquor liability insurance and a copy of the required Fire Safety Inspection Certificate to the Local Licensing Authorities. Please do not forward the Fire Safety Certificates, Insurance Certificates, or License Certificates to the ABCC. You should keep these forms for your records. Please mail the completed below form, all completed renewal certificate forms, and any corrective forms to the ABCC no later than January 16th, 2022 with no staples included. ABCC c/o Licensing Department 95 Fourth Street, Suite 3 Chelsea, MA 02150 Any renewal application not signed and filed by November 30th will be treated as a New License. If renewal application becomes a new license for failure to meet the November 30th signing deadline, it will be subject to all the procedures set forth under Chapter 138, §15A. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ABOVE GUIDELINES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO HURSHEL LANGHAM AT EXT. 719 or SABRINA LUC AT EXT. 721 Ralph Sacramone, Executive Director RENEWAL CERTIFICATION 2023 CITY/TOWN: A. LICENSEES WHO FAILED TO RENEW FOR 2023: B. LICENSEES DISAPROVED BY THE CITY/TOWN FOR 2023: We hereby certify that the premises described in the 2023 renewal applications for the above mentioned municipality are now occupied, used or controlled by the licensee and will be on January 1, 2023. The 2021 Renewal Applications have been approved by the Local Licensing Authorities and forwarded to the ABCC. The Local Licensing Authorities LICENSE #: LICENSE #: LICENSEE CORPORATE NAME AND ADDRESS: LICENSEE CORPORATE NAME AND ADDRESS: A. LICENSEES WHO FAILED TO RENEW FOR 2023: LICENSE #: B. LICENSEES DISAPROVED BY THE CITY/TOWN FOR 2023: LICENSEE CORPORATE NAME AND ADDRESS: LICENSE #:LICENSEE CORPORATE NAME AND ADDRESS: LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF BREWSTER Liquor License Hearing In accordance with MGL Chapter 138, Sections 4-17C, the Brewster Select Board will hold a public hearing on Monday December 5, 2022 at 6:15pm at their virtual meeting, in order to review and renew the following annual liquor license applications for 2023, in the Town of Brewster. To participate in this meeting by phone, please call 312-626-6799 or 301-715-8592. Webinar ID: 509224. To participate by Zoom webinar, please use this link.https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89092910526?pwd=WHM2V3hrVklhSTloWWhVU09kanUzQ T09 Passcode: 509224. All interested parties are invited to attend. All Alcoholic Restaurants Brewster Inn Inc, d/b/a Woodshed Brown Dog Investments Inc., d/b/a Laurinos Cape Cod Village Brewster Pizza House LLC Alexandra & Athanasios LLC d/b/a Stone L’Oven Pizza Brewster El Patron Inc. d/b/a The Island Blue Crab Food & Spirits Vernon J Smith d/b/a Brewster Fish House Bow to Stern Ltd, d/b/a Freemans Grill BANDG LLC, d/b/a Apt Cape Cod General On-Premises Wines & Malt ACK Gioia All Alcoholic Club Ocean Edge Resort Ltd Partnership, d/b/a Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center Brewster Post 9917 VFW Ocean Edge Resort Ltd Partnership, d/b/a Linx Tavern and Bar All Alcoholic Hotel/Innkeeper Chillingsworth Inc. Old Sea Pines Inn Corp. Spincape LLC, d/b/a Spinnaker All Alcoholic Package Store Checkerberry Inc. d/b/a Millstone Liquors Lukes of Brewster Inc. Kmkb Inc., d/b/a Brewster Village Marketplace Brewster Farms Quick Pik Inc. A Plus Ventures Inc. d/b/a Winslow’s Spirits & Things Vidira Corp. d/b/a Brewster Wine & Spirits Wines & Malts Package Store A Rose Realty Inc. d/b/a Ferretti’s Market OERGC Inc. d/b/a Ocean Edge Resorts To Whom It May Concern: Acting under authority contained in M.G.L. Ch. 138, s17, as amended, our Board at a meeting held on , estimated that the temporary increased resident population of , as of July 10, 2023 will be . This estimate was made and voted upon by us at a meeting called for the purpose, after due notice to each of the members of the time, place and purpose of said meeting, and after investigation and ascertainment by us of all the facts and after cooperative discussion and deliberation. The estimate is true to the best of our knowledge and belief. The above statements are made under the pains and penalties of perjury. City / Town: 2023 Seasonal Population Increase Estimation Form Date: Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission c/o Licensing Department 95 Fourth Street, Suite 3 Chelsea, MA 02150 Date of Meeting City / Town Name Estimated Population Very truly yours, Local Licensing Authorities This certificate must be signed by a majority of the members of the local licensing authority. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION 95 Fourth Street, Suite 3, Chelsea, MA 02150 Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov To: Select Board as Liquor Licensing Authority From: Erika Mawn Date: November 29, 2022 RE: Motions for Renewal of Annual Liquor Licenses 2023 The following are the suggested motions for the renewal of all 2023 Annual Liquor Licenses: I move that the Board vote to approve the following renewal of annual all alcoholic restaurant licenses pending they pass their annual inspections, have submitted the required liquor liability insurance and all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: BANDG LLC d/b/a Apt Cape Cod Veron J Smith d/b/a Brewster Fish House Brewster Pizza House, LLC Bow to Stern Ltd, d/b/a Freemans Grill Brewster El Patron, Inc. d/b/a Island Blue Crab Food & Spirits Brown Dog Investments, Inc. d/b/a Laurino’s Cape Cod Village Alexandra and Athanasios Inc., d/b/a Stone L’Oven Pizza Brewster Inn Inc., d/b/a Woodshed I move that the Board vote to approve the following renewal of annual general on-premises wines and malt license pending they pass their annual inspections, have the required liquor liability insurance and all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: ACK Gioia, LLC I move that the Board vote to approve the following renewals of annual all alcoholic club licenses pending they pass their annual inspections, have the required liquor liability insurance and all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: Brewster Post 9917 VFW of the U.S., Inc. d/b/a Brewster Post #9917 VFW Ocean Edge Resort Limited Partnership d/b/a Inn Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center Ocean Edge Resort Limited Partnership d/b/a Linx Tavern and Bar I move that the Board vote to approve the following renewals of annual all alcoholic hotel/innkeeper licenses pending they pass their annual inspections, have the required liquor liability insurance and all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: Chillingsworth Inc. Old Sea Pines Inn Corp., d/b/a Old Sea Pines Inn Spincape LLC, d/b/a Spinaker Office of: Select Board Town Administrator I move that the Board vote to approve the following renewals of annual all alcoholic package store licenses, pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: Brewster Farms Quick Pik Inc., d/b/a Brewster Farms Quick Pik Kmkb Inc., d/b/a Brewster Village Marketplace Vidira Corp., d/b/a Brewster Wine & Spirits Lukes of Brewster Inc., d/b/a Lukes Super Liquors Checkerberry Inc., d/b/a Millstone Liquors A Plus Ventures d/b/a Winslow’s Spirits and Things I move that the Board vote to approve the following renewal of annual wines and malt package store licenses, pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: A Rose Realty Inc., d/b/a Ferretti’s Market OERGC Inc., d/b/a Ocean Edge Resorts Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov To: The Select Board From: Erika Mawn Date: November 29, 2022 RE: Renewal of Annual Licenses for 2023 Each year the Select Board votes to renew licenses issued to establishments who conduct business in the Town of Brewster. All licensees have expressed their intention to renew their licenses and have submitted their renewal fee for 2023. The renewal of annual licenses is contingent on compliance with all other local permits and regulations. Annual Common Victualler’s Licenses Ack Gioia LLC Harbor Lights Mini Golf Course Apt Cape Cod Island Blue Crab Food & Spirits Breakwater Fish & Lobster J.T.’s Seafood Restaurant Brewster Inn & Chowder House/ The Woodshed Kate’s Cape Cod Ice Cream Brewster Pizza House The Kitchen Café Brewster Post #9917 VFW Laurino’s Cape Cod Village Café Alfresco Linx Tavern (Ocean Edge Resort) Candleberry Inn Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center Cape Cod National Golf Club Old Sea Pines Inn Chillingsworth Sea Meadow Inn Cobies Snowy Owl Dunkin Donuts Spinnaker Eat Cake 4 Breakfast Stone L’Oven Freemans Grill Hawker & Peddler Licenses Boundless Inc. (Eric Barber) Annual Lodging House & Innkeepers Licenses Brewster By the Sea Old Sea Pines Inn Candleberry Inn Pepper House Inn Chillingsworth Sea Meadow Inn Michael’s Cottages Spinnaker Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center Captain Freeman Inn Old Manse Inn The Ruddy Turnstone Annual Class II and Livery Licenses Don’s Auto Cosmetics Bola Talabi-Export Only Cape Cod Patient Transport Office of: Select Board Town Administrator The Tax Collector’s office has reviewed the financial obligations of each establishment, any establishment that has outstanding taxes will not have their annual license renewed until payment is received. The Health Department reviewed the list of establishments and provided the following information: Ferretti’s Market is in the process of transferring ownership. The new owners will need to apply for pertinent Food Service Permits. If they wish to continue to sell tobacco products, they will also need to obtain a license from the Brewster Board of Health as well as through the state. The Kitchen Café is proposing the addition of an outdoor walk-in-cooler to the property which is currently under review. The Pepper House has not been required to be licensed as a Bed & Breakfast by the Health Department since 2019 when the Food Code Regulations changed. The Building Department is completing their annual inspections in coordination with the Fire Department, any establishment that does not pass inspection will not have their annual license renewed until the Building Department has signed off on the inspection. The Planning Department noted that the Kitchen Café has applied for a special permit (for limited-service restaurant use, in addition to the current full-service restaurant use) and site plan review. The Planning Board will notice a hearing on the matter on December 14, 2022. The Police Department had the following issues in 2022: Dispute between the owners of J.T.’s Seafood and The Kitchen Café, the issue stemmed from a parking dispute. At the Brewster Pizza House, followed up on a couple of parking complaints as a result of staff parking in the fire lane. Ocean Edge had a few noise complaints from neighbors, these have already been presented to the Select Board. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701 www.brewster-ma.gov To: Select Board as Liquor Licensing Authority From: Erika Mawn Date: November 23, 2022 RE: Motions for Renewal of Annual Liquor Licenses The following are the suggested motions for the renewal of 2023 Annual Licenses: I move that the Select Board vote to approve the renewal of the following Annual Common Victualler’s licenses, pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town and the establishment has passed all building and health inspections: Ack Gioia • Apt Cape Cod Breakwater Fish & Lobster • Brewster Fish House Restaurant Brewster Inn / Woodshed • Brewster Pizza House Brewster VFW Post 9917 • Café Alfresco Candleberry Inn • Cape Cod National Golf Club Chillingsworth • Cobie’s Dunkin Donuts • Eat Cake 4 Breakfast Freeman’s Grill • Harbor Lights Mini Golf Island Blue Crab Food & Spirits • J.T.’s Seafood Kate’s Cape Cod Ice Cream • Laurino’s Cape Cod Village Linx Tavern at Ocean Edge • Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center Old Sea Pines Inn • Sea Meadow Inn Snowy Owl Coffee Roasters • Spinnaker Stone L’Oven Pizza • The Kitchen Cafe I move that the Select Board vote to approve the renewal of the following Annual Innholder’s licenses, pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town and the establishment has passed all building and health department inspections: Brewster By the Sea • Candleberry Inn Chillingsworth • Michael’s Cottages Ocean Edge Inn & Conference Center • Old Manse Inn Old Sea Pines Inn • Pepper House Inn Sea Meadow Inn • Spinnaker I move that the Select Board vote to approve the renewal of the following Annual Lodging House licenses, pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town and the establishment has passed all building and health department inspections: The Captain Freeman Inn • The Ruddy Turnstone Office of: Select Board Town Administrator I move that the Board vote to approve the renewal of the following Annual Used Car Dealers/ Class II Licenses, pending all financial obligation have been paid to the Town: Don’s Auto Cosmetics • Bola Talabi – Export Only I move that the Select Board vote to approve the renewal of the following Annual Livery License, pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: • Cape Cod Patient Transport, LLC d/b/a Prime Medical Transport I move that the Select Board vote to approve the renewal of the following annual Hawker and Peddler Licenses pending all financial obligations have been paid to the Town: Boundless, Inc. (Eric Barber) Nauset High School Building Project Nauset Regional School Committee Presented By Chris Easley, Chair Judith Schumacher, Vice Chair 1 Proposed Nauset Regional High School 2 PROBLEM DEFINED IN 2014 50-year-old High School Building IN NEED OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN REPAIRS TO BRING UP TO CURRENT BUILDING CODE 2014 SEARCH FOR A SOLUTION BEGAN IN EARNEST 3 SOLUTION TIMELINE 2014 to 2022 ●2015 Application to MSBA Building Program Rejected ●2016 Application to MSBA Building Program Accepted !!!! ●Spring 2017 Town Meetings Voted and Approved $1.3 million to fund the Building Project Feasibility Study 4 2018-2019 ●Forums held in each member town to get community input of priorities for new High School ●Building Committee Formed; Owner's Project Manager & Architect Hired ●13 Potential design options were developed and reviewed ●Preferred Building Design Selected and presented in forums held in each District member town 5 February 2020 MSBA Approves Nauset’s Building Design & Project Budget MSBA Awards Approximately $36 million In State Funding for the NRHS project 6 Spring 2020 ●Town Meetings Canceled as a result of Covid ●Vote Postponed on Funding High School Building Project March 30, 2021 .District-wide Vote Approves $131,825,665 to fund the Nauset Regional High School Building project as proposed -70%+ Voter Approval 7 March 2021 to Present ●Building design developed into Blueprint & Bid Documents ●37 Mobile Trailer Units Purchased and Installed at High School for Temporary Classrooms ●Design modifications made to reduce costs without compromising Educational Plan - $7.3 Million in reductions 8 June 2022 Building Project Put out for Bids October 2022 Two bids received: ●Brait Builders won the bid at $134.4 million ●2nd bidder - $15 million more at $159.8 million ●Low Bid represents a $29.7 million increase from the December 2019 Construction Cost Estimate ●Note:Estimate is 3 Years Old November 2022 ●At its Meeting the Nauset School Committee Voted to ask the Taxpayers for the additional funds to construct the High School as Planned 9 ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS & CONTINGENCY Additional Construction Costs - $29,675,835 Additional Construction Contingency Funds - $ 5,984,665 Soft Cost & Administration - $ 1,000,000 FF&E/IT (escalation cost) - $ 814,500 Construction Testing & Inspection Services - $ 125,000 Moving Services & Storage Containers - $ 100,000 Builder’s Risk Insurance - $ 400,000 Total Estimated Additional Costs - $38,100,000 Current Total Project Budget: $131,825,665 Revised Total Project Budget: $169,925,665 Total New Funding Request: $38,100,000 10 Here is a look at the Estimated Tax Consequences of the Revised Building Budget for each of Our Nauset Towns 11 Tax Impact Estimates 30 Year Bond ●4.65 % Interest Rate, Based on a 30-Year Level Debt Bond (Subject to change) ●Calculations Based On Individual Town Property Tax rates as well as the town’s percentage of students in the Nauset system First Year and Every Year (per $100,000 of assessed value) Brewster:$67.87 Eastham:$38.42 Orleans:$37.41 Wellfleet:$29.55 12 Tax Impact Estimates 25 Year Bond ●4.5 % Interest Rate, Based on a 25-Year Level Debt Bond (Subject to change) ●Calculations Based On Individual Town Property Tax rates as well as the town’s percentage of students in the Nauset system First Year and Every Year (per $100,000 of assessed value) Brewster:$87.91 Eastham:$51.70 Orleans:$40.38 Wellfleet:$40.10 13 OUR OPTIONS ●One We can vote to provide the additional Funding and build the High School as Proposed ●Two We can vote down the additional funding and start all over again Let Us take a look at Both Options 14 Option One Vote to Provide Additional funding to build the High School as Proposed. WHY ?? ●Current Plan Eight years in the Making - 1000’s of Person Hours Invested ●The New High School as Proposed is the Community-Selected solution to our problem of a 50 year old High School ●15 ●$28 Million has been Borrowed and has been Expended and/or Committed for work done and contracted to date ●The $36 Million MSBA Grant will not be lost ●Quality General Contractor - Brait Builders, who won the project with the lowest bid, is the same quality Contractor that built Cape Tech 16 Option Two Vote Against Additional Funding ●Without Additional Funding the Current Project IS DEAD. We Start All Over. ●We must still Pay the $28 Million already borrowed towards this agreed Solution. ●We lose the $36 Million MSBA Grant, with little to no hope of getting another grant. 17 ●We lose a quality Construction Company in Brait Builders. ●We lose having a KNOWN COST for the Solution to our Problem !!! ●We wait another 4 to 5 years for the Development of a New Solution with an UNKNOWN COST ●We must continue to Maintain a 50 Year Old High School Building & the 37 Mobile Trailer Classrooms ●We risk having to bring the Entire High School Building Complex up to code if any major system breaks down and requires replacement 18 The Financial Impact of your VOTE!!! A Vote to Provide the Additional Funding Required keeps the Project Moving Forward and protects the $28 Million already committed to this solution, while also ensuring that we maintain our $36 Million Grant Funding from the State Which Makes it a $64 Million Question 19 Questions? 20 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Last day to request vote by mail ballot January 3rd Last day to request vote by mail ballot January 3rd Last day to request ballot by mail May 9th 6:00pm 384 Underpass Road Last day to register to vote November 3rd - Open until 5pm Last day to post Special Town Mtg Warrant October 23rd Last day to register to vote May 5th - Open until 5pm Last day to post warrant May 9th SPECIAL TOWN MEETING November 13th, 2023 Last day to submit nominations papers March 28th Prop 2 1/2 deadline questions to Town Clerk April 11th Last day to withdraw nomination papers April 13th ANNUAL TOWN ELECTION May 16th, 2023 7:00am - 8:00pm 1848 Main Street Last day to obtain nomination papers March 24th Warrant Closes February 15th Last day to register to vote April 21st - Open until 5pm Last day to post Annual/Special Warrant April 10th 384 Underpass Road 11:00am - 7:00pm 1848 Main Street Last day to post Warrant January 3rd Last day to register to vote December 30th Prop 2 1/2 deadline questions to Town Clerk December 6th ANNUAL/SPECIAL TOWN MEETING May 1st, 2023 6:00pm Last day to register to vote December 30th-Open until 5pm SPECIAL TOWN ELECTION January 10th, 2023 2023 NAUSET REG'L SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION January 10th, 2023 11:00am - 7:00pm 1848 Main Street Last day to post Warrant - Posted by Cmt Secretary December 31st (10 days) Nauset Public Schools 78 Eldredge Park Way, Orleans, Massachusetts 02653 Phone: 508-255-8800 • Fax: 508-240-2351 • http://nausetschools.orq Brooke A. Clenchy Superintendent of Schools Robin A. Millen Ed.D. Mary Buchanan Director of Curriculum Director of Student Services Giovanna B. Venditti Joanna Hughes Director of Finance and Operations Director of Human Resources Nauset Regional School District Suggested Votes for Additional Funds to Pay Costs of Proposed Addition/Renovation of NRHS (Vote of the Regional School District School Committee) I, the undersigned Secretary of the Nauset Regional School District School Committee (the "Committee") of the Nauset Regional School District, Massachusetts (the "District"), hereby certify that the following is a true copy of excerpts from the minutes of a special meeting of the Committee duly called and held on November 3, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. at the offices of the District, pursuant to due and proper notice of time, place and purpose of said meeting (the "Meeting") given to each member of the Committee. The meeting was attended by nine (s9_) of the ten (10) members of the Committee, constituting a quorum, which members were present and voting throughout; and the following vote was duly adopted by vote of nine (9) yeas, zero (0) nays and zero (0) abstentions: "VOTED: That the Nauset Regional School District (the "District") hereby appropriates the sum of Thirty -Eight Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($38,100,000), for the purpose of paying costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto, which amount shall be expended in addition to the One Hundred Thirty -One Million Eight Hundred Twenty -Five Thousand Six Hundred Sixty -Five Dollars ($131,825,665) previously appropriated for this purpose (the "Project"), which school facility shall have an anticipated useful life as an educational facility for the instruction of school children for at least 50 years, said amount to be expended at the direction of the School Building Committee. To meet this appropriation the District is authorized to borrow said amount, under and pursuant to G.L. c. 71, §16(n) and the District Agreement, as amended, or pursuant to any other enabling authority. The District acknowledges that although the amount originally appropriated to pay costs of the Project is eligible for grant funding through the Massachusetts School Building Authority ("MSBA"), the additional amount appropriated by this vote will not be eligible for grant funding through the MSBA. The additional debt authorized by this vote of the Committee shall be submitted to the registered voters of the District's member towns for approval at a District -wide election to be held on January 10, 2023 in accordance with the provisions of G.L. c. 71, §16(n) and the District Agreement. The warrant calling the District -wide election to be held on January 10, 2023, in the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved, with such changes as bond counsel to the District shall approve prior to its posting." WITNESS my hand as of this 4th day of Noveyrber;e, 2022. Dis ° ict Secretary (District Seal) Nauset Public Schools 78 Eldredge Park Way, Orleans, Massachusetts 02653 Phone: 508-255-8800 • Fax: 508-240-2351 • http://nausetschools.orq Brooke A. Clenchy Superintendent of Schools Robin A. Millen Ed.D. Mary Buchanan Director of Curriculum Director of Student Services Giovanna B. Venditti Joanna Hughes Director of Finance and Operations Director of Human Resources ELECTION WARRANT The Commonwealth of Massachusetts NAUSET REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Barnstable, ss. To the registered voters of the Towns of Brewster, Eastham, Orleans and Wellfleet, GREETINGS: You are hereby notified and warned that the inhabitants of the Towns of Brewster, Eastham, Orleans, and Wellfleet registered to vote in any of said Towns, said Towns being the member towns of the Nauset Regional School District, are to meet at their respective polling places, to wit, In the TOWN OF BREWSTER at the Brewster Baptist Church, located at 1848 Main Street in said Town, in the TOWN OF EASTHAM at the Town Hall, located at 2500 State Highway in said Town, in the TOWN OF ORLEANS at the Orleans Senior Center (Council on Aging), located at 150 Rock Harbor Road in said Town, and in the TOWN OF WELLFLEET at the Adult Community Center, located at 715 Old King's Highway in said Town, on Tuesday, January 10, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., to vote by BALLOT on the following question: "Do you approve of the vote of the Regional District School Committee of the Nauset Regional School District adopted on November 3, 2022, to authorize the borrowing of $38,100,000 to pay additional costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto, which vote provides, in relevant part, as follows: "VOTED: That the Nauset Regional School District (the "District") hereby appropriates the sum of Thirty -Eight Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($38,100,000), for the purpose of paying costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto, which amount shall be expended in addition to the One Hundred Thirty -One Million Eight Hundred Twenty -Five Thousand Six Hundred Sixty -Five Dollars ($131,825,665) previously appropriated for this purpose (the "Project"), which school facility shall have an anticipated useful life as an educational facility for the instruction of school children for at least 50 years, said amount to be expended at the direction of the School Building Committee. To meet this appropriation the District is authorized to borrow said amount, under and pursuant to G.L. c. 71, §16(n) and the District Agreement, as amended, or pursuant to any other enabling authority. The District acknowledges that although the amount originally appropriated to pay costs of the Project is eligible for grant funding through the Massachusetts School Building Authority ("MSBA"), the additional amount appropriated by this vote will not be eligible for grant funding through the MSBA. " Yes No The polls will be open from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The District Secretary is hereby directed to serve this Warrant by posting an attested copy thereof in at least one public place in each of the Towns of Brewster, Eastham, Orleans, and Wellfleet, and by publishing a copy thereof at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, said posting and publication to occur at least ten days before the day of election as aforesaid. The District Secretary shall make due return of this Warrant with his or her doings thereon to the District Secretary, on or before the day of the election aforesaid. [The balance of this page is intentionally blank.] DATE: Given under our hands and the seal of the Nauset Region& School District this 3rd day of November, 2022. l uset Regional School District School Committee RETURN OF SERVICE The undersigned, Secretary of the Regional District School Committee of the Nauset Regional School District, certify that at least 10 days prior to Tuesday, January 10, 2023, I posted or caused to be posted, a true and attested copy of this warrant in in at least one public place in each of the Towns of Brewster, Eastham, Orleans, and Wellfleet (collectively, the District's "Member Towns"), and in addition, that I caused a copy of the within warrant to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the Member Towns of the District on Sunday, December 18, 2022 which date was also at least 10 days prior to Tuesday, January 10, 2023, all as required by G. c 1, §16(n). ir) cretary foip03,3_ ; A Tr ; e Copy Atte District k6z:::, DATE: I t /01 OFFICIAL BALLOT DISTRICT ELECTION NAUSET REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT January 10, 2023 QUESTION Do you approve of the vote of the Regional District School Committee of the Nauset Regional School District adopted on November 3, 2022 to authorize the borrowing of $38,100,000 to pay additional costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto, which vote provides, in relevant part, as follows: "VOTED: That the Nauset Regional School District (the "District") hereby appropriates the sum of Thirty -Eight Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($38,100,000), for the purpose of paying costs of renovating and adding to Nauset Regional High School, located at 100 Cable Road, North Eastham, Massachusetts, including the payment of all costs incidental or related thereto, which amount shall be expended in addition to the One Hundred Thirty -One Million Eight Hundred Twenty -Five Thousand Six Hundred Sixty -Five Dollars ($131,825,665) previously appropriated for this purpose (the "Project"), which school facility shall have an anticipated useful life as an educational facility for the instruction of school children for at least 50 years, said amount to be expended at the direction of the School Building Committee. To meet this appropriation the District is authorized to borrow said amount, under and pursuant to G.L. c. 71, §16(n) and the District Agreement, as amended, or pursuant to any other enabling authority. The District acknowledges that although the amount originally appropriated to pay costs of the Project is eligible for grant funding through the Massachusetts School Building Authority ("MSBA"), the additional amount appropriated by this vote will not be eligible for grant funding through the MSBA. " Yes No L District Se r•tary Naus-t Regional School District NRHS Building Project Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Save the Date: January 10, 2023 - 11:00 am - 7:00 pm NRHS Building Update Public Presentations: December 5, 2022 - Brewster BOS @ 6:30PM December 6, 2022 (Tentative) - Public Forum 5:30PM December 12, 2022 - NPS Joint School Committee Meeting December 14, 2022 - Orleans BOS @ 5:00PM December 15, 2022 (Tentative) - Public Forum 5:30PM December 19, 2022 - Eastham BOS 5:30PM December 20, 2022 - Wellfleet BOS 7:00PM General Fiscal Information What is the total amount of additional funds requested, and the new total cost for the project? The total amount of additional funds requested is $38,100,000. The new total amount for the entire project is $169,925,665. When was the original amount approved, and how much was it? The initial vote approved a total of $131,825,665 for the Nauset Regional High School Building project. The original budget was developed and moved forward in December 2019 and approved on February 9th, 2020. Who approved the new budget and vote? It is the responsibility of the NRSD School Committee to approve a budget. In this case, with new funds being required, they have asked for the four communities to vote on the new amount. Why are the costs so much higher? The overall costs are reflective of what we are experiencing in our homes, but on a much larger scale. The costs have escalated dramatically since the budget was first established at the end of December 2019 and then finalized in February 2020, and as a result of escalation costs, supply chain issues, etc. these costs have increased. This overage also includes restoring the contingency fund level, and making it whole after additional costs for the modular project were necessary. Why is this additional funding needed? Recently the Owner’s Project Manager (OPM) went out to bid on behalf of the Nauset Regional School Committee for both the Sub-Trades component of the project and the role of the General Contract (GC). The Sub-Trades bids came in approximately $20 million more than anticipated, and the General Contractor bids came in at almost $10 million higher than anticipated. The purchase of additional modular units increased the cost of that particular component of the total project. The School Building Committee decided, in consultation with the OPM, to take the necessary funds for the modular units from the pre-established contingency fund line - which then decreased our available contingency line. Therefore, the contingency line now needs to be made “whole” again. It also needs to reflect a contingency that is in line with the new project budget amount. Finally, there were a couple of additional funding lines that required review such as furniture and IT, testing and inspections, and insurance, that have experienced natural escalation costs as well. These lines also need to be increased. The matrix for this can be viewed here. What amount of money has been spent on the project to date? To date the following monies have been spent: The District has borrowed $28,136,774 of Bond Anticipation Notes for the project and has spent and encumbered $21,004,019 thus far. Is any of the additional funding necessary for the project, reimbursable by MSBA? No. Currently all additional funding is anticipated to be shared by the four communities. If these funds are approved, what year would it be first fully incorporated into our communities’ taxes? 2024 Process What is the date and time of the vote to decide to approve or disapprove these additional funds? Will mail-in voting be an option? The district-wide vote will take place on January 10th, 2023 from 11:00 am - 7:00 pm. Yes, mail-in voting will be an option. However, early in-person voting will not be an option. Why is a school district-wide vote occurring, rather than individual Special Town Meetings or Annual Town Meetings? The four Town Administrators within the Nauset Public School (NPS) communities met with their respective Town Clerks and the NPS Leadership team members and collectively decided to recommend a district-wide event. The Regional School Committee accepted and voted on this recommendation as the next course of action. It is anticipated that this will be more efficient for the purposes of this particular vote and it follows the exact same pathway voters followed during the last voting period for this project. How will voter approval be achieved at both the district level and per town? The funds will be approved by a simple majority. The same is true per town regarding their debt exclusion component. A simple majority is required for both ballot questions. Why will there be two ballot questions? The first question is from the Nauset Regional School Committee asking to approve or disapprove the request for additional monies to continue work on the NRHS project. The second question is specific to each town asking for the ability to establish this process as part of a debt exclusion rather than part of regular appropriation monies. This process is identical to the one used initially (on March 30, 2021) for the approval of the NRHS Building project. Additional Information Why are there modular units onsite? The Nauset Public Schools had initially planned on purchasing 16 previously owned modular units. However, upon further reflection, it was decided to purchase all 37 units that were available. These units were staged and then conjoined in a “T” formation at the back of the NRHS property and will be able to house staff and students during the ongoing construction time period. It is anticipated that the additional modular units will allow us to shorten the total construction time by approximately one year. What is the construction timeline for the project if these funds are approved? It is anticipated that the timeline will remain close to the original timeframe, with a slight delayed start time. What will happen if the voters approve this additional funding? The building project will then proceed with only a slight delay and would be expected to be completed on time. Brait Builders would begin onsite-work at the end of January 2023. Staff and students would begin moving out of those buildings being targeted in Phase 1 of the project into the modular classrooms for instructional purposes. What will happen if the funding is not approved? All work on the NRHS building project would cease effective immediately. The grant funding from the Massachusetts School Building Authority would be lost completely (approximately $36 million). The entire process would have to begin anew, from the beginning stages. The time frame of approximately 7 years from the Submission of Interest (SOI) to an actual start of construction would restart (only IF approved by the MSBA). The current, aging NRHS building will continue to require substantial funds to keep it running appropriately. The NRSD has a Bond Anticipation Note of approximately $28 million. Of this amount, approximately $21 million dollars has been spent on project costs and the remainder is encumbered in full. This amount will need to be bonded and assessed to the four communities. Has NRSD taken any additional steps to seek fiscal relief? Yes. We have met with Senator Cyr and Representative Peake regarding our current fiscal situation with the project and have followed up with formal letters of request for assistance. We have also sent letters to key legislators and state Executive Directors asking for relief. MSBA is well aware of our current situation. Is there a website that has additional information? Yes, the link is here. Glossary of Terms Owner’s Project Manager (OPM): The key purpose of an OPM is to help oversee and manage the total building project. They work in partnership with the school district and also serve as a liaison between the Massachusetts School Building Authority and a school district. They have leadership who work onsite with the project and help to guide the project from start to finish. School Building Committee (SBC): The SBC is a committee that is linked to the Nauset Regional School Committee. They are voted on to serve by the NRSD School Committee. A majority of these roles have been pre-determined by the MSBA, but the individuals who serve on the committee are designated by the NRSD School Committee. They meet regularly with the OPM and project Architect/Engineer and operate in a manner similar to that of the NRSC. Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA): The Massachusetts School Building Authority was created by the Massachusetts legislature in 2004 to replace the former school building assistance program. The MSBA collaborates with municipalities in finding the right-sized, most fiscally responsible and educationally appropriate solutions to create safe, sound, and sustainable learning environments. They have made more than $16.1 billion in reimbursements to cities, towns, and regional school districts for construction costs since 2004. 1 Donna Kalinick From:Arlynn L. Consiglio <consiglioal@nausetschools.org> Sent:Friday, November 18, 2022 11:17 AM To:Cathy Doane; Jacqueline Beebe; John Kelly; Molly Bates; Peter Lombardi; Richard Waldo; ryoungredirect Cc:Brooke Clenchy Subject:Fact Sheet - Parent Square Post Good Morning, The message below was just posted to the NPS Community via Parent Square. Dear Parents, Staff, and Community Members, Please click HERE to read a "Fact Sheet" recently prepared and submitted by the Nauset Regional School Committee. It presents important information and a chronological timeline regarding the current NRHS Building Project. This is a follow-up to the recently sent Special Edition newsletter update. Next week we will be sending a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document. We want to ensure that our families, staff and community have as much information as possible concerning the status of the project and the upcoming vote scheduled for January 10, 2023. Our thanks to those involved in preparing this document. Yours in Partnership, Superintendent Brooke Clenchy Arlynn L. Consiglio (she/her/hers) Executive Assistant to the Superintendent Notary Public Recording Secretary (508) 255-8800 ext. 7002 consiglioal@nausetschools.org Follow us on Twitter:@NausetSupt The Nauset Public Schools does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, gender identity, religion, national origin, limited English proficiency, sexual orientation, disability, homelessness or housing status in its educational programs, activities or employment policies. Please note the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office has determined that most emails to and from municipal offices and officials are public records. For more information please refer to: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/preidx.htm. This transmission contains information which is confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. Nauset Regional School District- Financing Scenario- 25 Year Bond 11/28/2022 12/2020 $95M Bond / Int rate 2.34% Avg 2023 2021 TEMP.SHORT Level Debt BOND ANNUAL 47.4074%IMPACT IMPACT Median 48.0400%IMPACT IMPACT Median Projected FISCAL DEBT PRINCIPAL TERM BOND INTEREST DEBT NET RESID.$100,000 Home Value NET RESID.$100,000 Home Value Change YEAR ISSUED OUTSTAND. INTEREST PRINCIPAL 4.500%SERVICE DEBT SVC TAX RATE HOUSE 636,700.00$ DEBT SVC TAX RATE HOUSE 461,500.00$ In Cost 2022 0 $133,100,000 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 2023 $0 $133,100,000 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2024 $130,115,000 2,985,000 5,989,500 8,974,500 $4,254,577 $0.73 $73.26 $466.47 $2,379,713.98 $0.56 $55.93 $258.11 $208.35 2025 $126,995,000 3,120,000 5,855,175 8,975,175 $4,254,897 $0.73 $73.27 $466.50 $2,449,991.96 $0.58 $57.58 $265.74 $200.76 2026 $123,735,000 3,260,000 5,714,775 8,974,775 $4,254,707 $0.73 $73.27 $466.48 $2,450,232.16 $0.58 $57.59 $265.76 $200.72 2027 $120,325,000 3,410,000 5,568,075 8,978,075 $4,256,272 $0.73 $73.29 $466.65 $2,449,871.86 $0.58 $57.58 $265.72 $200.93 2028 $116,765,000 3,560,000 5,414,625 8,974,625 $4,254,636 $0.73 $73.26 $466.47 $2,448,790.96 $0.58 $57.55 $265.61 $200.87 2029 $113,045,000 3,720,000 5,254,425 8,974,425 $4,254,542 $0.73 $73.26 $466.46 $2,449,271.36 $0.58 $57.56 $265.66 $200.80 2030 $109,155,000 3,890,000 5,087,025 8,977,025 $4,255,774 $0.73 $73.28 $466.60 $2,448,670.86 $0.58 $57.55 $265.59 $201.00 2031 $105,090,000 4,065,000 4,911,975 8,976,975 $4,255,750 $0.73 $73.28 $466.59 $2,449,271.36 $0.58 $57.56 $265.66 $200.94 2032 $100,840,000 4,250,000 4,729,050 8,979,050 $4,256,734 $0.73 $73.30 $466.70 $2,448,430.66 $0.58 $57.54 $265.57 $201.13 2033 $96,400,000 4,440,000 4,537,800 8,977,800 $4,256,142 $0.73 $73.29 $466.64 $2,448,430.66 $0.58 $57.54 $265.57 $201.07 2034 $91,760,000 4,640,000 4,338,000 8,978,000 $4,256,236 $0.73 $73.29 $466.65 $2,449,319.40 $0.58 $57.57 $265.66 $200.98 2035 $86,915,000 4,845,000 4,129,200 8,974,200 $4,254,435 $0.73 $73.26 $466.45 $2,448,622.82 $0.58 $57.55 $265.59 $200.86 2036 $81,850,000 5,065,000 3,911,175 8,976,175 $4,255,371 $0.73 $73.28 $466.55 $2,448,742.92 $0.58 $57.55 $265.60 $200.95 2037 $76,555,000 5,295,000 3,683,250 8,978,250 $4,256,355 $0.73 $73.29 $466.66 $2,449,319.40 $0.58 $57.57 $265.66 $201.00 2038 $71,025,000 5,530,000 3,444,975 8,974,975 $4,254,802 $0.73 $73.27 $466.49 $2,449,127.24 $0.58 $57.56 $265.64 $200.85 2039 $65,245,000 5,780,000 3,196,125 8,976,125 $4,255,347 $0.73 $73.28 $466.55 $2,450,568.44 $0.58 $57.59 $265.80 $200.75 2040 $59,205,000 6,040,000 2,936,025 8,976,025 $4,255,300 $0.73 $73.28 $466.55 $2,448,790.96 $0.58 $57.55 $265.61 $200.94 2041 $52,895,000 6,310,000 2,664,225 8,974,225 $4,254,447 $0.73 $73.26 $466.45 $2,448,646.84 $0.58 $57.55 $265.59 $200.86 2042 $46,300,000 6,595,000 2,380,275 8,975,275 $4,254,945 $0.73 $73.27 $466.51 $2,450,088.04 $0.58 $57.58 $265.75 $200.76 2043 $39,405,000 6,895,000 2,083,500 8,978,500 $4,256,473 $0.73 $73.30 $466.67 $2,450,664.52 $0.58 $57.60 $265.81 $200.86 2044 $32,200,000 7,205,000 1,773,225 8,978,225 $4,256,343 $0.73 $73.29 $466.66 $2,450,376.28 $0.58 $57.59 $265.78 $200.88 2045 $24,675,000 7,525,000 1,449,000 8,974,000 $4,254,340 $0.73 $73.26 $466.44 $2,449,223.32 $0.58 $57.56 $265.65 $200.79 2046 $16,810,000 7,865,000 1,110,375 8,975,375 $4,254,992 $0.73 $73.27 $466.51 $2,449,607.64 $0.58 $57.57 $265.70 $200.82 2047 $8,590,000 8,220,000 756,450 8,976,450 $4,255,502 $0.73 $73.28 $466.57 $2,449,079.20 $0.58 $57.56 $265.64 $200.93 2048 $0 8,590,000 386,550 8,976,550 $4,255,549 $0.73 $73.28 $466.57 $2,450,040.00 $0.58 $57.58 $265.74 $200.83 2049 $0 0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $133,100,000 91,304,775 $224,404,775 $106,384,469 $1,831.92 $11,663.84 $61,164,892.84 $1,437.53 $6,634.21 $5,029.63 Interest rate subject to change based upon market rate environment Does not include short-term interest Terms of Debt to be Voted by the Nauset Regional School Committee Total FY23 Valuation for 'New Financing Schedule' is $5,807,261,160.00 Total FY21 Valuation for 'Prior Financing Schedule' is $4,254,853,730.00 New Financing Schedule Prior Financing Schedule 11/2022 $133M Bond / Int rate 4.5% Brewster Per 1,000 Brewster Per 1,000 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 TOTAL General Fund Debt Public Way Exempt Principal 135,000.00 135,000.00 135,000.00 135,000.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 1,730,000.00 3/1/2016 (I)Interest 32,062.50 26,662.50 21,262.50 15,862.50 13,162.50 10,562.50 7,962.50 5,362.50 2,762.50 317,912.50 - School Remodel Principal 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 145,000.00 2,610,000.00 3/1/2016 (I) Exempt Interest 52,562.50 46,762.50 40,962.50 35,162.50 32,262.50 29,362.50 26,462.50 23,562.50 20,662.50 17,581.25 14,318.75 10,875.00 7,250.00 3,625.00 629,662.50 - - Library Parking non ex Principal 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 270,000.00 5/3/2017 (I)Interest 5,860.00 4,860.00 3,860.00 2,860.00 2,360.00 1,860.00 1,410.00 960.00 490.00 57,710.00 - Public Way Exempt Principal 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 700,000.00 5/3/2017 (I)Interest 15,925.00 13,425.00 10,925.00 8,425.00 7,175.00 5,925.00 4,800.00 3,675.00 2,500.00 1,275.00 160,750.00 - Public Way Exempt Principal 110,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 1,390,000.00 5/3/2017 (I)Interest 31,015.00 25,515.00 20,265.00 15,015.00 12,390.00 9,765.00 7,402.50 5,040.00 2,572.50 303,640.00 - Fire Station Principal 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 6,175,000.00 5/3/2017 (I) Exempt Interest 150,150.00 133,900.00 117,650.00 101,400.00 93,275.00 85,150.00 77,837.50 70,525.00 62,887.50 54,925.00 46,637.50 38,025.00 29,250.00 19,500.00 9,750.00 1,840,962.50 - Fire Station Principal 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 6,005,000.00 3/15/2018 (I) Exempt Interest 157,500.00 148,500.00 140,250.00 125,250.00 110,250.00 101,250.00 92,250.00 83,250.00 74,250.00 65,250.00 56,250.00 47,250.00 38,250.00 28,875.00 19,500.00 9,750.00 2,047,975.00 - Sewer Non ex Principal 65,000.00 65,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 630,000.00 3/15/2018 (I)Interest 13,337.50 11,387.50 9,600.00 6,600.00 3,600.00 1,800.00 125,675.00 - Nauset MS Roof - 2/13/2015 Exempt Assessment 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 25,553.00 384,089.00 - Nauset HS Green Program - 8/15/2012 Exempt Assessment 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 86,240.00 1,296,282.00 - Cape Cod Tech Building Project - 11/1/2018 Exempt Assessment 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 549,461.00 9,750,547.00 - - Nauset HS Building Project -Financing Scenario - (133M 25-year level debt @ 4.5% interest)Exempt Assessment -4,254,577.00 4,254,897.00 4,254,707.00 4,256,272.00 4,254,636.00 4,254,542.00 4,255,774.00 4,255,750.00 4,256,734.00 4,256,142.00 4,256,236.00 4,254,435.00 4,255,371.00 4,256,355.00 4,254,802.00 4,255,347.00 4,255,300.00 4,254,447.00 4,254,945.00 4,256,473.00 4,256,343.00 4,254,340.00 4,254,992.00 4,255,502.00 4,255,549.00 106,384,468.00 - CCSC Acquisition Principal 395,000.00 400,000.00 420,000.00 440,000.00 465,000.00 485,000.00 510,000.00 535,000.00 565,000.00 575,000.00 585,000.00 600,000.00 610,000.00 625,000.00 640,000.00 655,000.00 675,000.00 690,000.00 710,000.00 725,000.00 745,000.00 770,000.00 790,000.00 810,000.00 835,000.00 860,000.00 885,000.00 910,000.00 935,000.00 965,000.00 19,810,000.00 11/10/2021 Exempt Interest 891,899.44 581,622.50 561,122.50 539,622.50 516,997.50 493,247.50 468,372.50 442,247.50 423,222.50 411,822.50 399,930.00 387,187.50 373,572.50 359,057.50 343,557.50 327,206.25 310,080.00 292,162.50 273,435.00 253,881.25 233,482.50 212,272.50 190,235.00 167,435.00 143,993.75 119,625.00 94,322.50 68,295.00 41,542.50 13,992.50 9,935,443.19 - Total GF Principal 1,545,000.00 1,545,000.00 1,560,000.00 1,580,000.00 1,600,000.00 1,620,000.00 1,585,000.00 1,610,000.00 1,640,000.00 1,395,000.00 1,355,000.00 1,370,000.00 1,380,000.00 1,395,000.00 1,265,000.00 955,000.00 675,000.00 690,000.00 710,000.00 725,000.00 745,000.00 770,000.00 790,000.00 810,000.00 835,000.00 860,000.00 885,000.00 910,000.00 935,000.00 965,000.00 39,320,000.00 Interest 1,350,311.94 992,635.00 925,897.50 850,197.50 791,472.50 738,922.50 686,497.50 634,622.50 589,347.50 550,853.75 517,136.25 483,337.50 448,322.50 411,057.50 372,807.50 336,956.25 310,080.00 292,162.50 273,435.00 253,881.25 233,482.50 212,272.50 190,235.00 167,435.00 143,993.75 119,625.00 94,322.50 68,295.00 41,542.50 13,992.50 15,419,730.69 2,895,311.94 2,537,635.00 2,485,897.50 2,430,197.50 2,391,472.50 2,358,922.50 2,271,497.50 2,244,622.50 2,229,347.50 1,945,853.75 1,872,136.25 1,853,337.50 1,828,322.50 1,806,057.50 1,637,807.50 1,291,956.25 985,080.00 982,162.50 983,435.00 978,881.25 978,482.50 982,272.50 980,235.00 977,435.00 978,993.75 979,625.00 979,322.50 978,295.00 976,542.50 978,992.50 54,739,730.69 Total Exempt Principal 1,460,000.00 1,460,000.00 1,480,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,520,000.00 1,540,000.00 1,565,000.00 1,590,000.00 1,620,000.00 1,395,000.00 1,355,000.00 1,370,000.00 1,380,000.00 1,395,000.00 1,265,000.00 955,000.00 675,000.00 690,000.00 710,000.00 725,000.00 745,000.00 770,000.00 790,000.00 810,000.00 835,000.00 860,000.00 885,000.00 910,000.00 935,000.00 965,000.00 38,420,000.00 Interest 1,331,114.44 976,387.50 912,437.50 840,737.50 785,512.50 735,262.50 685,087.50 633,662.50 588,857.50 550,853.75 517,136.25 483,337.50 448,322.50 411,057.50 372,807.50 336,956.25 310,080.00 292,162.50 273,435.00 253,881.25 233,482.50 212,272.50 190,235.00 167,435.00 143,993.75 119,625.00 94,322.50 68,295.00 41,542.50 13,992.50 15,236,345.69 2,791,114.44 2,436,387.50 2,392,437.50 2,340,737.50 2,305,512.50 2,275,262.50 2,250,087.50 2,223,662.50 2,208,857.50 1,945,853.75 1,872,136.25 1,853,337.50 1,828,322.50 1,806,057.50 1,637,807.50 1,291,956.25 985,080.00 982,162.50 983,435.00 978,881.25 978,482.50 982,272.50 980,235.00 977,435.00 978,993.75 979,625.00 979,322.50 978,295.00 976,542.50 978,992.50 53,656,345.69 Total Non Exempt Principal 85,000.00 85,000.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 ---------------------635,000.00 Interest 19,197.50 16,247.50 13,460.00 9,460.00 5,960.00 3,660.00 1,410.00 960.00 490.00 ---------------------94,292.50 104,197.50 101,247.50 93,460.00 89,460.00 85,960.00 83,660.00 21,410.00 20,960.00 20,490.00 ---------------------729,292.50 School Assessment - Exempt 661,254.00 4,915,831.00 4,916,151.00 4,915,961.00 4,917,526.00 4,915,890.00 4,915,796.00 4,917,028.00 4,917,004.00 4,917,988.00 4,917,396.00 4,917,490.00 4,915,689.00 4,916,625.00 4,805,816.00 4,804,263.00 4,804,808.00 4,255,300.00 4,254,447.00 4,254,945.00 4,256,473.00 4,256,343.00 4,254,340.00 4,254,992.00 4,255,502.00 4,255,549.00 ----117,815,386.00 - Current Exempt Debt & Assessment Payments 3,452,368.44 3,097,641.50 3,053,691.50 3,001,991.50 2,966,766.50 2,936,516.50 2,911,341.50 2,884,916.50 2,870,111.50 2,607,107.75 2,533,390.25 2,514,591.50 2,489,576.50 2,467,311.50 2,187,268.50 1,841,417.25 1,534,541.00 982,162.50 983,435.00 978,881.25 978,482.50 982,272.50 980,235.00 977,435.00 978,993.75 979,625.00 979,322.50 978,295.00 976,542.50 978,992.50 171,471,731.69 (w/out Nauset HS Debt)- Total FY23 Valuation: $5,807,260,060 Nauset HS Debt: -4,254,577.00 4,254,897.00 4,254,707.00 4,256,272.00 4,254,636.00 4,254,542.00 4,255,774.00 4,255,750.00 4,256,734.00 4,256,142.00 4,256,236.00 4,254,435.00 4,255,371.00 4,256,355.00 4,254,802.00 4,255,347.00 4,255,300.00 4,254,447.00 4,254,945.00 4,256,473.00 4,256,343.00 4,254,340.00 4,254,992.00 4,255,502.00 4,255,549.00 ---- Tax Rate Portion of Currect Excluded Debt 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.52 0.51 0.51 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.38 0.32 0.26 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Tax Rate Portion of NHS Building -0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 ---- Total Amount of Tax Rate from Exempt Debt 0.59 1.27 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.24 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.11 1.05 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Incl. School Debt Median Value Home in FY23 $636,700 -466.47 466.50 466.48 466.65 466.47 466.46 466.60 466.59 466.70 466.64 466.65 466.45 466.55 466.66 466.49 466.55 466.55 466.45 466.51 466.67 466.66 466.44 466.51 466.57 466.57 ----11,663.85 SEPTIC MULTI #8 MULTI #7 Multi #12 MULTI #8 Water Dept Multi #12 Multi #13 Multi #10 Multi #11 Multi #12 Multi #12 Multi #13 Multi #14 Sea Camps 11/18/2022 Loan # 2 BBJ Land Acq Golf Irrigation Well Access BBJ Land Acq Building RB Ebenezer TOB Bates Land Water Pump Route 6A Eddy School Fire Station Fire Station OUTSTANDING OUTSTANDING GRAND TOTAL Phase 1 Water(Slough)Road Phase 2 RB South Pond Road Freemans Land Water Mains Roof Roads Tri-Town FY TOTALS ACTUAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST OUTSTANDING RB Barons & KingsGrant & Jolly Whaler RB Captain Fitts Repairs RD Bett-Allen/Prell Renovation RB Moss RB Leona PAID END OF FY END OF FY END OF FY RB Tower Hill $24,367,007.63 FY02 $10,614,809.96 $34,981,817.59 Library Parking 2024 P $5,000.00 $45,000.00 $35,000.00 $25,000.00 $80,000.00 $120,000.00 $15,000.00 $135,000.00 $35,000.00 $180,000.00 $45,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $375,000.00 $400,000.00 $2,160,000.00 I $4,050.00 $3,710.00 $2,500.00 $14,400.00 $24,960.00 $2,300.00 $26,662.50 $11,182.50 $57,050.00 $13,100.00 $46,762.50 $182,560.00 $161,812.50 $581,622.50 $1,132,672.50 $3,292,672.50 $35,095,000.00 FY24 $11,256,086.25 $46,351,086.25 2025 P $5,000.00 $45,000.00 $35,000.00 $25,000.00 $80,000.00 $120,000.00 $15,000.00 $135,000.00 $35,000.00 $170,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $370,000.00 $420,000.00 $2,160,000.00 I $2,025.00 $2,231.25 $1,500.00 $10,800.00 $20,040.00 $1,700.00 $21,262.50 $9,782.50 $51,650.00 $11,300.00 $40,962.50 $156,560.00 $151,500.00 $561,122.50 $1,042,436.25 $3,202,436.25 $32,935,000.00 FY25 $10,213,650.00 $43,148,650.00 2026 P $35,000.00 $25,000.00 $80,000.00 $120,000.00 $15,000.00 $135,000.00 $35,000.00 $170,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $365,000.00 $440,000.00 $2,125,000.00 I $743.75 $500.00 $7,200.00 $15,120.00 $1,100.00 $15,862.50 $8,312.50 $46,550.00 $9,700.00 $35,162.50 $130,560.00 $133,000.00 $539,622.50 $943,433.75 $3,068,433.75 $30,810,000.00 FY26 $9,270,216.25 $40,080,216.25 2027 P $80,000.00 $120,000.00 $10,000.00 $130,000.00 $30,000.00 $165,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $365,000.00 $465,000.00 $2,070,000.00 I $3,600.00 $10,200.00 $800.00 $13,162.50 $6,825.00 $41,450.00 $8,900.00 $32,262.50 $117,560.00 $114,750.00 $516,997.50 $866,507.50 $2,936,507.50 $28,740,000.00 FY27 $8,403,708.75 $37,143,708.75 2028 P $120,000.00 $10,000.00 $130,000.00 $30,000.00 $165,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $365,000.00 $485,000.00 $2,010,000.00 I $5,160.00 $600.00 $10,562.50 $5,512.50 $36,500.00 $8,100.00 $29,362.50 $104,560.00 $103,800.00 $493,247.50 $797,405.00 $2,807,405.00 $26,730,000.00 FY28 $7,606,303.75 $34,336,303.75 2029 P $10,000.00 $130,000.00 $30,000.00 $165,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $305,000.00 $510,000.00 $1,855,000.00 I $400.00 $7,962.50 $4,162.50 $31,550.00 $7,300.00 $26,462.50 $92,860.00 $92,850.00 $468,372.50 $731,920.00 $2,586,920.00 $24,875,000.00 FY29 $6,874,383.75 $31,749,383.75 2030 P $10,000.00 $130,000.00 $30,000.00 $160,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $305,000.00 $535,000.00 $1,875,000.00 I $200.00 $5,362.50 $2,812.50 $26,600.00 $6,500.00 $23,562.50 $81,160.00 $83,700.00 $442,247.50 $672,145.00 $2,547,145.00 $23,000,000.00 FY30 $6,202,238.75 $29,202,238.75 2031 P $130,000.00 $30,000.00 $160,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $520,000.00 $305,000.00 $565,000.00 $1,895,000.00 I $2,762.50 $1,425.00 $21,600.00 $5,700.00 $20,662.50 $68,940.00 $74,550.00 $423,222.50 $618,862.50 $2,513,862.50 $21,105,000.00 FY31 $5,583,376.25 $26,688,376.25 2032 P $160,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $375,000.00 $305,000.00 $575,000.00 $1,600,000.00 I $16,400.00 $4,850.00 $17,581.25 $56,200.00 $65,400.00 $411,822.50 $572,253.75 $2,172,253.75 $19,505,000.00 FY32 $5,011,122.50 $24,516,122.50 2033 P $160,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $325,000.00 $300,000.00 $585,000.00 $1,555,000.00 I $11,200.00 $3,950.00 $14,318.75 $46,637.50 $56,250.00 $399,930.00 $532,286.25 $2,087,286.25 $17,950,000.00 FY33 $4,478,836.25 $22,428,836.25 2034 P $160,000.00 $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $325,000.00 $300,000.00 $600,000.00 $1,570,000.00 I $5,600.00 $3,000.00 $10,875.00 $38,025.00 $47,250.00 $387,187.50 $491,937.50 $2,061,937.50 $16,380,000.00 FY34 $3,986,898.75 $20,366,898.75 2035 P $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $325,000.00 $300,000.00 $610,000.00 $1,420,000.00 I $2,000.00 $7,250.00 $29,250.00 $38,250.00 $373,572.50 $450,322.50 $1,870,322.50 $14,960,000.00 FY35 $3,536,576.25 $18,496,576.25 2036 P $40,000.00 $145,000.00 $325,000.00 $300,000.00 $625,000.00 $1,435,000.00 I $1,000.00 $3,625.00 $19,500.00 $28,875.00 $359,057.50 $412,057.50 $1,847,057.50 $13,525,000.00 FY36 $3,124,518.75 $16,649,518.75 2037 P $325,000.00 $300,000.00 $640,000.00 $1,265,000.00 $9,750.00 $19,500.00 $343,557.50 $372,807.50 $1,637,807.50 $12,260,000.00 FY37 $2,751,711.25 $15,011,711.25 2038 P $300,000.00 $655,000.00 $955,000.00 I $9,750.00 $327,206.25 $336,956.25 $1,291,956.25 $11,305,000.00 FY38 $2,414,755.00 $13,719,755.00 2039 P $675,000.00 $675,000.00 I $310,080.00 $310,080.00 $985,080.00 $10,630,000.00 FY39 $2,104,675.00 $12,734,675.00 2040 P $690,000.00 $690,000.00 I $292,162.50 $292,162.50 $982,162.50 $9,940,000.00 FY40 $1,812,512.50 $11,752,512.50 2041 P $710,000.00 $710,000.00 I $273,435.00 $273,435.00 $983,435.00 $9,230,000.00 FY41 $1,539,077.50 $10,769,077.50 2042 P $725,000.00 $725,000.00 I $253,881.25 $253,881.25 $978,881.25 $8,505,000.00 FY42 $1,285,196.25 $9,790,196.25 2043 P $745,000.00 $745,000.00 I $233,482.50 $233,482.50 $978,482.50 $7,760,000.00 FY43 $1,051,713.75 $8,811,713.75 2044 P $770,000.00 $770,000.00 I $212,272.50 $212,272.50 $982,272.50 $6,990,000.00 FY44 $839,441.25 $7,829,441.25 2045 P $790,000.00 $790,000.00 I $190,235.00 $190,235.00 $980,235.00 $6,200,000.00 FY45 $649,206.25 $6,849,206.25 2046 P $810,000.00 $810,000.00 I $167,435.00 $167,435.00 $977,435.00 $5,390,000.00 FY46 $481,771.25 $5,871,771.25 2047 P $835,000.00 $835,000.00 I $143,993.75 $143,993.75 $978,993.75 $4,555,000.00 FY47 $337,777.50 $4,892,777.50 2048 P $860,000.00 $860,000.00 I $119,625.00 $119,625.00 $979,625.00 $3,695,000.00 FY48 $218,152.50 $3,913,152.50 2049 P $885,000.00 $885,000.00 I $94,322.50 $94,322.50 $979,322.50 $2,810,000.00 FY49 $123,830.00 $2,933,830.00 2050 P $910,000.00 $910,000.00 I $68,295.00 $68,295.00 $978,295.00 $1,900,000.00 FY50 $55,535.00 $1,955,535.00 2051 P $935,000.00 $935,000.00 I $41,542.50 $41,542.50 $976,542.50 $965,000.00 FY51 $13,992.50 $978,992.50 2052 P $965,000.00 $965,000.00 I $13,992.50 $13,992.50 $978,992.50 $0.00 FY52 $0.00 $0.00 P $185,254.00 $875,000.00 $2,972,000.00 $274,945.00 $1,625,000.00 $2,475,000.00 $227,074.00 $2,000,000.00 $675,000.00 $3,489,113.00 $840,168.00 $2,908,104.00 $9,349,000.00 $6,740,000.00 $19,810,000.00 $80,904,545.63 vertical totals Pncpl I $0.00 $382,653.22 $798,730.00 $52,197.80 $756,852.50 $1,072,380.00 $44,482.96 $441,437.50 $278,880.00 $1,106,923.39 $227,506.72 $798,911.66 $2,734,102.06 $2,196,650.00 $9,935,443.19 $31,082,073.99 vertical totals Int $80,904,545.63 Horizontal totals Pncpl $31,082,073.99 Horizontal totals Int FISCAL 2024 POTENTIAL TAX IMPACT OF NAUSET HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT ON BREWSTER RESIDENTS & ELECTION LOGISTICS Peter Lombardi, Town Administrator Town of Brewster, Massachusetts March 5, 2021 Nauset High School Debt •Baseline assumptions: o $95.1M total cost impact to the four member towns – based on $131.8M total project cost and $36.7M Massachusetts School Building Authority reimbursement o 25 year level principal term (actual term to be voted on by Nauset Regional School Committee) – term could be 20, 25, or 30 years and could be either level debt or level principal o 2.46% interest rate (4.25% assumption last year at this time) – still conservative since current municipal bond rates for similar projects are less than 2% o Brewster’s FY22 Nauset Regional Assessment of 48.17% – updated annually based on prior year student enrollment o Median FY21 Brewster home value of $461,500 03/05/21 2 Nauset High School Debt •Tax impacts for median Brewster homeowner: o $353/year in Year 1 o $268/year in Year 10 o $202/year in Year 25 o $6544 total assessment (25 years) •Shorter term would reduce total interest payments and debt service, but it would increase the annual tax rate impacts – longer term would have the opposite effect •Level debt would reduce initial annual tax impacts and normalize annual tax rate impacts but it would increase total interest payments and debt service 03/05/21 3 Election Logistics •Nauset Regional School Committee called District Election to be held in all 4 towns on the proposed high school project on Tuesday March 30 – no Town Meeting votes will be held •All 4 towns elected to have their own simultaneous Special Election to fund the project (if approved) via a debt exclusion or temporary increase to property tax rates in each town •Residents may vote by mail for both elections – all registered voters received postcard application for mail-in ballots (available on Town website too) •Ballots being sent to voters who signed up starting today – please follow instructions (see website) 03/05/21 4 Election Logistics •Voters will cast 2 ballots on/by March 30 •Regional District Election vote (yellow) is for the proposed project •Town Special Election vote (pink) would authorize the Town to exclude Brewster’s annual assessment (~$2-3M/year) from the tax levy if the project is approved •Both votes require a simple majority for approval (debt exclusions for Town projects require 2/3 vote) •District vote tally includes total votes cast by registered voters in all 4 member towns - Brewster’s % totals don’t impact whether project is approved •Town Special Election vote (debt exclusion) tally includes only votes cast by registered voters in Brewster 03/05/21 5 Debt Exclusion & Impact on Town Finances •Importance of funding project via a debt exclusion •Brewster’s FY22 operating budget projects modest levy capacity (~$20k) •If project is approved and Brewster debt is not excluded, Town would have to cut expenses in other areas by $2-3M to cover assessment •If project is approved and debt exclusion is not, Town has option to hold another debt exclusion vote before debt is issued and assessment imposed •Brewster’s FY22 Operating Budget includes ~$1.5M in excluded debt – incremental annual decreases in FY22+ but no major reductions until FY29+ 03/05/21 6 Select Board Meeting Dec 5, 2022 Brewster Finance Committee Questions for Nauset Regional School Committee Regarding Project Cost Overrun of $38M 1.Will you commit to requiring Ptown and Truro to pay their proportional share of the debt related to the new NRHS when their current Tuition Agreements conclude? In other words, will this be a non-negotiable condition of new Tuition Agreements? 2.With enrollment severely down, and the future likely to bring further declines, will the building, as designed, be flexible enough to bring 8th or even 7th grade students into it? (see attached chart) 3.What will be your policy regarding filling the school with School Choice students that pay just $5k – especially in light of Supt. Clenchy’s position* that she discussed at our March 23, 2022 meeting where she said that viewing School Choice as a revenue stream gets districts into trouble? Will you open 100+ seats either at once or over time? 4.The Fact Sheet presented by the NRSC noted a Bond Anticipation Note of approximately $28 million that was either spent or encumbered. Could you provide a breakdown of these costs? 5.The budget presented to taxpayers and the MSBA called for $3MM for the purchase of 16 modular units. Instead, you bought 21 more for a total of 37. What was the total amount spent? What budget line item was used to purchase the excess and what budget line item did you cut to be able to afford it under the taxpayer-approved budget? 6.When the NRHS project financial details were presented just prior to going to a vote on the Nauset Regional High School project, there were $42m in costs that MSBA would not recognize. Modulars, performing arts center and other items made up that $42m. What effort has been made to revisit those elements and reduce or eliminate them without affecting the project elements MSBA did agree to fund in an effort to reduce the cost overrun comprising $38.1 m? While such adjustments would require a rebid of the project it would avoid the lengthy “starting from scratch” effort identified as a “con” by the committee. 7.Are you considering a 25 or 30 year debt issue? The longer term will provide some taxpayer relief and more closely match the debt to the life of the building. It will also allow future taxpayers to help pay for the building those taxpayers will use. *Direct quote from Supt. Clenchy at the Brewster FinComm March 23, 2022 meeting (at 1:10-1:14 in the video): “Whenever a Superintendent starts to look at School Choice as a revenue stream, I think it only leads to trouble. Because you may, you can’t, look at it at from that perspective from my own personal philosophy and I’ve seen it where it’s gotten districts into trouble. So I’m very conscientious of that. With that said though, I do think that there are opportunities if you’re methodical and thoughtful and strategic going back to Pete’s word about strategy, if you’re strategic in how you do it. But I think if you ever move that balance too far just because you think you’re doing it for a stream of revenue, you’re in trouble. So I think that there’s room for School Choice in Nauset Public Schools but I think we want to be cautious and strategic with how we approach it.” Chart 1 Chart 2 944 921 877 854 800 905 905 905 905 905 750 800 850 900 950 1,000 10/1/18 10/1/19 10/1/20 10/1/21 10/1/22P (pop.) NRHS Enrollment Has Plummeted: -142/15% Current NRHS New NRHS Source: NRSD Official Enrollment Data 624 616 596 618 587 228 219 198 156 136 92 86 83 80 77 01002003004005006007008009001,000 10/1/18 10/1/19 10/1/20 10/1/21 10/1/22P (pop.) Source of Drop is Broad District Choice Ptown/Truro New NRHS Note: District -37/6%; Choice -92/40%; Ptown/Truro -15/16%; New NRHS steady at 905 students; Source: NRSD Official Enrollment Data 944 921 877 854 800 Chart 3 Chart 4 917 909 859 867 818 750 770 790 810 830 850 870 890 910 930 10/1/18 10/1/19 10/1/20 10/1/21 10/1/22P (pop.) K-5 Feeder/Pipeline in Freefall: -99/11% District Elementary Source: NRSD Official Enrollment Data 721 653 474 377 309 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 (pop.) And It's Not Over: Brewster Elementary Enrollment Expected to Tumble Brewster Population Ages 0-9 Source: Habeeb Elementary Schools Master Plan 12/31/2021;UMDI DOT Vintage Archive d: Monday, November 28, 2022 4:30:40 PM From: Vasiliki M. Limberis Se nt: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:49:59 +0000ARC To: Erika Mawn Subje ct: For the Select Committee, Dec 5 Se ns itivity: Normal Dear Select Committee: I have been following the news about the increas es in cos t for the renovations of Naus et Regional High School. A year ag o I voted for the renovations at the price that was originally propos ed. But now I am not s o s ure of this project. I know that all three towns involved in the high s chool mus t vote on January 10 in order for the increas e in cos ts to be approved. I am not convinced that the exorbitant increas e to the renovation is jus tified. Furthermore I think the committee that is overs eeing the project is too inflexible about revis iting the renovation plan and about taking the project back to the Commonwealth of Mas sachus etts . 1. Becaus e of the war in Ukraine, inflation is hig h and building cos ts and fuel cos ts have gone up astronomically. I think the committee overs eeing the renovations of Nauset High School s hould s cale back the propos ed renovations to fit the original cos t of the project, which the voters approved las t year. 2. Becaus e of the war in Ukraine and inflation, 90% of the citizens in this country are in s evere economic s traits . C oming this January the price of natural gas is going up 40%, and the price of electricity is g oing up 40%, if approved by the state, which I am s ure it will be. How can the Town of Brews ter (and Orleans and Eastham) expect the taxpayers to pay for a huge increas e in the cost of the renovations to the high s chool when our own incomes are being severely burdened by energ y cos ts , food cos ts , and health costs? Our incomes have not increas ed and will not be increas ed to cover thes e cos ts . 3. The committee res pons ible for the renovations s hould exercis e a great deal more flexibility in the plan, now that inflation and the war have had a s evere, dire impact on our lives . The situation has chang ed a great deal s ince the original vote was taken and was pos itive. The committee s hould be willing to s cale back the renovations . What is more, they s hould take all of these concerns to the s tate of Mas s achus etts and as k them to s top threatening to take away the s tate contribution in light of thes e extenuating, dire fis cal circums tances . Everyone is s uffering from very high inflation, and it is not fair for the taxpayers to foot the inflationary exces s es . I hope that the Brews ter Select Committee will take thes e concerns s erious ly and take them to the committee overs eeing the renovations of Naus et High School. Thank you, Dr. Vas iliki Limberis 46 Pells Fis hing Rd Brews ter (permanent res ident) Dr. Va siliki Limb eris P rofessor of Ancient Christianity, Emerita Depa rtment of Religion Temp l e Univ ersity P hila del phia, P A 19122 WESTON & SAMPSON ENGINEERS, INC. 55 Walkers Brook Drive, Suite 100 Reading, MA 01867 tel: 978.532.1900 FINAL REPORT November 2022 TOWN OF Brewster MASSACHUSETTS HVAC Feasibility Study for the Stony Brook Elementary School i Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. iii LIST OF APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2-2 3.0 ENERGY USAGE ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 3-1 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................. 4-3 4.1 HVAC ....................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2 Lighting .................................................................................................................... 4-8 5.0 RECOMMENDED OPTIONS ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Upgrade Boilers to Gas-Fired Option ........................................................................ 5-1 5.2 VRF with DOAS units (all electric) ............................................................................ 5-2 5.3 Air to Water Heat Pump Chiller (all electric) .............................................................. 5-3 5.4 Lighting Re-wiring ..................................................................................................... 5-4 5.5 Weatherization ......................................................................................................... 5-5 6.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 6-6 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 7-1 7.1 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Energy Efficiency Program Incentives ...................................................................... 7-2 ii Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Energy Consumption History ................................................................................... 3-2 Figure 2: Energy Consumption History (kBtu equivalent) ....................................................... 3-2 Figure 3: Energy Cost History ................................................................................................. 3-3 Figure 4: Side Elevation View of School .................................................................................. 4-3 Figure 5: Water Heater ............................................................................................................ 4-4 Figure 6: Existing Oil Boilers ................................................................................................... 4-5 Figure 7: Pneumatic Controls ................................................................................................. 4-6 Figure 8: Air Purifier ................................................................................................................. 4-6 Figure 9: Gymnasium .............................................................................................................. 4-7 Figure 10: Library .................................................................................................................... 4-7 Figure 11: Hallway LED Lighting ............................................................................................. 4-8 Figure 12: Opaque Light Fixture Covers ................................................................................. 4-8 Figure 13: Condensing Gas Boiler .......................................................................................... 5-1 Figure 14: Chiller ..................................................................................................................... 5-2 Figure 15: VRF Setup .............................................................................................................. 5-3 Figure 16: Heat Pump Chiller .................................................................................................. 5-4 Figure 17: Existing Electrical Service Panel ............................................................................ 6-6 iii Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com LIST OF TABLES Table 1 ....................................................................................... HVAC Feasibility Comparison Table Table 2 ................................................................................................ Mass Save Comparison Table Table 3 .............................................................................................................. ECM Summary Table iv Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A .................................................................................................... Cost Estimation Details Appendix B ...................................................................................... Equipment Datasheet Examples Appendix C ....................................................................................... eQUEST Energy Model Results Appendix D ......................................................................................................................... Floor Plan 1-1 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Weston & Sampson, on behalf of Cape Light Compact, has completed an HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) Feasibility Study of the Stony Brook Elementary School. The purpose of the study was to review the financial and technical feasibility of upgrading the HVAC system at the school. The existing heating system at the 92,000 ft2 school is a heating hot water system with an oil-fired boiler. There are some window air conditioners but no central cooling, and roof mounted exhaust fans. The existing domestic water system is a separate oil-fired water heater. Based upon provided existing conditions drawings, site investigations, and discussions with facility staff, the most significant deficiency is a lack of sufficient ventilation. This has created a musty environment in the lower level and poor air quality in general. In general, the existing equipment is aging and is in fair to poor condition and would not be capable of providing adequate ventilation to meet code and current air borne contamination concerns. Each of the recommendations include additional ventilation as required by code but also to help reduce air quality concerns. The annual energy usage of the facility includes an estimated 124,320 kWh of electricity and about 47,309 gallons of fuel oil. The estimated annual energy cost including electricity and fuel oil was approximately $117,300 total. The combined site energy utilization index (EUI) is on the order of 76 kBtu/ft2 per year (71 kBtu/ft2 after taking into account the impacts of the solar photovoltaic electricity generation), or a normalized cost of about $1.27/ft2/year. This is about 46% higher than the typical site EUI for a K-12 school1 even after including the solar impact, primarily due to space heating with fuel oil. Three primary options were provided for the school, as discussed in the comparison table below. If implemented, each of the three options could help the Stony Brook Elementary School reduce its annual energy consumption (kBtu/ft2) and resulting environmental impact. See below for more details. Table 1 – HVAC Feasibility Comparison Table Option Fuel Oil Savings (gal) Natural Gas Impact (therm) Electricity Impact/ Penalty (kWh) EUI (kBtu/ft2) Annual Cost Savings ($/year) Capital Project Cost ($) Custom er Pre- Incentive ROI (%) Incre ment al ROI (%) Incentive ($) 1a) Boilers Upgrade ONLY 47,309 35,196 0 34.9 $8,373 $2,130,000 3% 14% $0* 1b) Gas-fired Efficient Boilers with Cooling 47,309 35,196 8,960 43.3 $53,512 $7,851,358 1% 1% $0* 2) VRF with DOAS 47,309 0 366,550 18.3 $13,614 $8,042,362 0% 7% TBD 3) Air Source Heat Pump Chiller 47,309 0 346,490 17.6 $17,827 $9,083,038 0% 1% TBD 1 https://www.energystar.*gov/buildings/benchmark/understand_metrics/what_eui 1-1 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com Table 2 – Mass Save Comparison Table Option Fuel Oil Usage (gal) Natural Gas Usage (therm) Electric Usage (kWh) Fuel Oil Savings Natural Gas Savings (therm) Increme ntal Electric Impact/ Penalty (kWh) Project Cost ($) Incremental Cost ($) Estimat ed Incentiv e ($) 0) Upgrade Fuel Oil Boilers Only (Assumed MassSAVE Baseline for Boilers Upgrade) 44,526 0 127,230 2,783 N/A 0 $1,700,000 N/A N/A 1a) Gas-fired Efficient Boilers Upgrade ONLY 0 35,196 127,230 44,526 -35,196 0 $2,130,000 N/A $0* 1b) Gas-fired Efficient Boilers with Cooling 0 35,196 136,190 44,526 -35,196 8,960 $7,851,358 N/A $0* 1c) Electrification Measure Baseline (ISP Gas Boilers) 0 39,213 136,190 44,526 -39,213 8,960 $7,851,358 N/A N/A 2) VRF with DOAS 0 0 493,780 0 0 366,550 $8,042,362 $191,004 TBD** 3) Air Source Heat Pump Chiller 0 0 473,720 0 0 346,490 $9,083,038 $1,231,680 TBD** Note 1 (*): As per MA Climate Bill adopted in 2022, we are assuming no incentives are available for the gas boilers option since this project is not expected to be completed soon; however if done sooner than 2025 there may be up to $8,000 per boiler ($16,000 total) available from National Grid. There also is an estimated $30,000 cost to provide the gas service directly to the site which is included in the cost above. Note 2: The first option (1a) includes boilers only to natural gas and assumes significant electrical upgrades (service panel s) are necessary to accommodate. Incremental cost is not applicable due to the prescriptive rebate. Note 3: Each of the heat pump options used the gas boilers as a baseline as per Mass Save requirements. Fuel oil savings cannot be claimed for a major renovation project. Note 4 (**): Incentives for the VRF and air source heat pump chiller measures will require custom technical reviews of which the incentive source (Cape Light Compact or National Grid) would vary depending on the baseline and other factors. The Mass Save results in Table 2 above are for the purpose of applying for incentives only. Resulting baseline and proposed energy usage was modeled through the building energy modeling tool, eQUEST for the purpose of applying to energy efficiency incentives through Cape Light Compact and National Grid. 2-2 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Introduction This study is an HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) feasibility study to review the financial and technical feasibility of an upgraded HVAC system at the Stony Brook Elementary School and was performed by Weston & Sampson on behalf of the Brewster Schools and sponsored by Cape Light Compact. The objective of the study was to identify and develop recommendations that would provide options for the Town of Brewster and the Brewster Schools to upgrade and replace their aging oil-fired boiler system. This assessment included an energy use analysis, walk through of the facility, HVAC inventory and summary of possible solutions. The results of this report are meant to provide the stakeholders with information to determine what, if any, modifications could be implemented that would be eligible for energy efficiency incentives from Cape Light Compact and/or National Grid and help the school with its energy consumption and environmental impact. As part of this assessment, we collected and reviewed building electric and fuel oil usage data. We also performed a site visit to assess existing HVAC equipment primarily. During this site visit, the general condition of the building and equipment was also noted. The following section describes the building components. This study was not intended to review or convey structural conditions of the facility. 3-1 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 3.0 ENERGY USAGE ANALYSIS Available utility data for the facility was collected and reviewed for evaluation of electric and fuel oil usage. The total electric usage for the facility is an average of 125,640 kWh over two years including FY2019 and FY2022. Fuel oil two-year usage averaged 37,190 gallons. Additionally there is a solar photovoltaic (PV) system on the roof that produces about 130,608 kWh on average of electricity generation. Due to the global pandemic related to Covid-19 over 2020 and 2021 the energy usage during that period was disregarded for use in our analysis. This resulted in a total average annual energy cost of approximately $97,329 over the two years (. The square footage of the facility is approximately 92,000 ft2. The current energy use index after taking the solar PV generation into consideration is 56 kBtu/ft2 and a cost index of $1.06/ft2/year. A summary of each utility is described below. The school is located in Brewster, Massachusetts and is a part of the Eversource electrical service territory and National Grid natural gas territory. Cape Light Compact provides the energy efficiency programs and incentives for the Town that are relevant to saving electricity and fuel oil, and National Grid provides incentives for projects with natural gas savings. The average electric rate (fully included with supply and delivery) per kWh that the facility pays is approximately $0.21/kWh. As the Town of Brewster receives net metering credits for this site, the actual bill incurred over the past two years has been approximately $0 after applying associated credits. A chart showing the monthly electric consumption, oil usage, and solar generation data is provided in Figure 1, below. The fuel oil usage was higher in FY2022 due to pandemic related operational changes. Average usage shown below includes FY19 and FY22 usage only, however for the analysis we used FY22 as our baseline assuming these ventilation changes are here to stay for the foreseeable future. The focus of the recommendations in this study are on moving the school away from its fuel oil heating source due to both the economic impact as well as the environmental benefits associated with electricity and natural gas. 3-2 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com Figure 1: Energy Consumption History The energy data (kBtu) chart below shows a much higher kBtu usage in FY2022 com pared to the past two years, primarily due to operational changes after the Covid pandemic. This also shows the relatively large impact to energy consumption that fuel oil has on the overall building. Figure 2: Energy Consumption History (kBtu equivalent) The cost for electricity and fuel oil are compared in the chart below over the past few years. The magnitude of energy costs are significantly higher for fuel oil than electricity (even prior to considering the impact from solar PV generation). 4-3 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com Figure 3: Energy Cost History 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Weston & Sampson conducted a walkthrough of the Stony Brook Elementary School located at 384 Underpass Road in Brewster, Massachusetts on August 8, 2022. Photographic documentation and field measurements were collected using various recording devices. During this site visit, the general condition of the building was observed and noted, including a review of the energy use areas. The following sections describe the building in terms of existing energy usage areas. Additional documentation provided by the Brewster Schools included: HVAC plans from 1975 and 1987. Drawings for the latest HVAC renovations in 1989 were not available for review. The Stony Brook Elementary School is approximately 92,000 ft2. The school has a single-story building that consists of office spaces, meeting rooms, restrooms, mechanical rooms, a gym, a cafetorium, and a kitchen. It also has a two-story building that consists of classrooms, a library, an art room, restrooms, and teacher’s lounge. Both of these buildings were built in 1975. A two-story addition was built in 1989 that consists of additional classrooms, a computer room, and a music room. The building is primarily used as an elementary school for Kindergarten through 2nd grade during the school year, with summer programs and YMCA (tenant) use year-round. Operating hours for the building typically are 7am-5pm Monday through Friday, with some nights and events during the school year. During summer months the occupied hours are about 8am- 5pm Monday through Friday. The Stony Brook Elementary School is built out of masonry, steel, and wood with cedar shingle siding. Figure 4: Side Elevation View of School 4-4 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com The buildings have flat areas with built-up roofing systems and asphalt shingle sloped roofs. This assessment was not intended to review structural conditions of the building. 4.1 HVAC General Mechanical Equipment The school currently has six Heating and Ventilation (HV) units with HW coils to provide heating and ventilation to most of the school, including the gym, cafetorium, kitchen, library, and interior spaces of the addition. Forty (40) through-the-wall unit ventilators (UV) supply heating and ventilation to all the classrooms. There are several fin tube radiators (FTR) in classrooms that supplement heating as required. There are additional FTRs in the hallways to provide heating. The offices and halls also have convectors to supplement heating. The offices have window air conditioners to provide limited cooling of the area. The controls throughout the entire school are pneumatic. The air for the pneumatic system is provided by an air compressor in the mechanical room that operates frequently. This is typical for older pneumatic systems as leaks develop in the pneumatic tubing that are hard to locate. There is a new oil-fired domestic water heater with an 80-gallon tank (installed in the last 5 years). The school replaced the larger heater due to reduced water needs. The school does not have a school-wide cooling system, they use primarily five window air conditioning units to cool select rooms. There are roof mounted exhaust fans for exhaust. The team observed that the kitchen uses electric appliances. The project team highlighted some concerns with the current HVAC system and have provided recommendations that accommodate these issues. The team was informed that the existing expansion tank at central heating plant had become waterlogged and was drained. They were also informed that the abatement would most likely be required in the boiler room at a minimum. The team observed that there is a musty smell in the lower classrooms near and around the library. The library itself does not have heating at the floor level and is difficult to bring up to the desired temperature through morning warm-up during the coldest months. The air compressor in the boiler room dedicated to controls runs every 10 minutes during the summer which appears to be excessive. Other than the five window air conditionin g units, the building does not have air conditioning, however the building is utilized the entire year for summer programs and for tenant use (YMCA). There is an existing 1,250 gallon, oil-fired domestic water heater that is not being used and has been abandoned in place. The UVs are past their life expectancy and will be difficult to repair due to parts becoming inaccessible. The boilers and the 60 kW generator are also past their life expectancy. The generator’s automatic transfer (AT) switch does not work and must be switched manually, and the exhaust is not sealed, potentially allowing gases to be released into the room while running. There is also an oil leak from the generator. Figure 5: Water Heater 4-5 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com Heating: The central heating plant consists of two large cast iron, oil-fired boilers that supply hot water at 180°F to the terminal equipment (FTR, UH, HV, UV, convectors, etc.) with 160°F return water. The piping to the terminal equipment is a mix of schedule 40 steel and copper with insulation which is typical for this type of system. One of the boilers has an updated burner with approximately 10-15 year old controls. The HW system appurtenances include an expansion tank, air separator, pumps, etc. The pumps are equipped with new VFDs and the above ground oil storage tank is 6,000-gallons. The occupied heating setpoint controlled currently by a central building management system (BMS) is 68°F and the unoccupied setpoint is 58°F. Heating hot water is provided by two (2) oil-fired, non-condensing boilers located in the mechanical room. The boilers were manufactured by Weil Mclain and are cast iron sectional boilers with an approximate output 2,000 MBH for each boiler. Supply hot water temperature is up to 180 deg F, and return water temperature is 160 deg F. They are sequenced via a Heat Timer controller. Boilers supply hot water to the following equipment: • Unit ventilators (UV) in the classrooms • Fin-tube radiators (FTR) throughout the building • Unit heaters (UH)/convectors throughout the building • Heating and ventilation units (HV) serving the large open spaces; cafetorium, kitchen, gym, and library The boiler’s exhaust flue is connected to the old chimney. Combustion air is provided to the mechanical room by the wall louver on the exterior wall. Cooling: There are five existing window air conditioners providing cooling to select office spaces. Heating Distribution: The two-pipe system is a reverse return setup. The two-pipe system consists of hot water primary loop with (2) end-suction pumps and (2) inline pumps. Each end suction pump that serves the 1975 building is 150 GPM, 52 feet, 5 hp (running as lead/spare). The 1989 addition has two inline pumps that are dedicated to the addition. All pumps that were seen are constant speed and have recently installed variable frequency drives (VFD). The piping is distributed throughout the building to the terminal equipment (coils in the HVs, FTR, convectors, and UHs). Figure 6: Existing Oil Boilers 4-6 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com Controls: The HVAC system is controlled by an existing pneumatic control system. The air compressor is in the boiler room with copper tubing throughout the building. The air compressor consists of two 2HP compressors. The existing air compressor runs frequently. Ventilation: Ventilation for the building is provided by various equipment. HVs (heating and ventilating units) provide ventilation to the cafetorium, gym, kitchen, library, and the interior of the new addition. The UVs provide ventilation to the classrooms. There are also UV air purifiers located in some areas since Covid to help with air quality. Figure 7: Pneumatic Controls Figure 8: Air Purifier 4-7 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com Building Spaces Gymnasium/Lockers The gym is primarily served by the HV unit, H&V-1. HV-1 provides 460 MBH of heat and 10,560 CFM of supply air and 5,280 CFM of outside air. HV-1 is also ducted to the adjacent locker room areas. There are FTR under the high glass to provide supplemental heat. There are also FTR and convectors in the adjacent locker rooms and corridor. There is an exhaust fan that serves the gym and gym storage areas that provides 4,010 CFM of exhaust. There is also a dedicated exhaust fan for the locker room area that provides 1,270 CFM of exhaust. Cafetorium/Offices /Halls The cafetorium (cafeteria and auditorium) is primarily served by the HV unit, H&V-2. HV-2 provides 468 MBH of heat and 11,065 CFM of supply air and 4,595 CFM of outside air. There are FTR and convectors in the adjacent offices to provide heat. There is an exhaust fan that serves the office area that provides 995 CFM of exhaust. Kitchen The kitchen is primarily served by the HV unit, H&V-3. HV-3 provides 385 MBH of heat and 4,685 CFM of supply air and 4,685 CFM of outside air (100% OA unit). There are FTR and convectors in the adjacent kitchen spaces to provide heat. There is an exhaust fan that serves the dishwasher hood that provides 600 CFM and kitchen hood that provides 6,375 CFM of exhaust. Library The library is primarily served by the HV unit, H&V-4. HV-4 provides 468 MBH of heat and 15,915 CFM of supply air and 3,915 CFM of outside air. There are FTR and convectors along the perimeter of the Figure 9: Gymnasium Figure 10: Library 4-8 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com main level to provide supplemental heat. There is no heat at the floor of the library. Interior classrooms and corridors of the addition The interior classrooms and corridors of the addition are primarily served by two HV units, H&V-5 & 6. No existing information is available for these two units. Classrooms Each classroom is primarily served by the Unit Ventilator (UV). The UV provides between 23 MBH and 40 MBH of heat depending on the size of the classroom. Each UV provides 750 CFM of supply air and modulates between 150 CFM and 750 CFM of outside air. There are FTR in the some of the classrooms to provide supplemental heat. 4.2 Lighting There was a recent energy efficiency project sponsored by Cape Light Compact that had been implemented at the school, converting the majority of light fixtures to LED (Light Emitting Diodes). However in some of the classrooms (for example Room 032) there are sof t opaque covers to reduce the amount of lighting in those spaces when both sides of the classroom are occupied. Originally there were temporary dividers installed in these double classrooms, but they have been solely used as separate classrooms. See photo of the covers in Figure 12: Opaque Light Fixture Covers below. Figure 12: Opaque Light Fixture Covers Figure 11: Hallway LED Lighting 5-1 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 5.0 RECOMMENDED OPTIONS Three options for HVAC upgrades are listed below, with the primary idea to move toward electrification. Additionally, we looked at building envelope and one recommendation on the already energy-efficient lighting systems. A more detailed description of these recommendations is included on the following pages. The project team has come up with three HVAC options for the school: 1) High Efficiency Gas-Fired Boilers, ERVs (Energy Recovery Ventilators), to replace the HVs (Heating and Ventilation Units), and an air-cooled chiller utilizing the existing piping of the heating system. a. Gas Heating Only b. Gas Heating and Cooling 2) VRF (Variable Refrigerant Flow) with DOAS (Dedicated Outdoor Air System) unit, packaged heat pump UVs (Unit Ventilators), and ERVs (Energy Recovery Ventilators) to replace the HVs; and 3) Air to water heat pumps utilizing the existing pipe system, ERVs to replace the HVs, and ERVs and fan coils in classrooms. For each of the HVAC options, savings for this measure were calculated by using the industry standard energy modeling software eQUESTTM to help compare existing energy usage to the proposed energy efficient scenario utilizing provided data, information collected during our site visit, and energy usage consumption. The base model’s energy consumption was calibrated to the existing energy usage as discussed above, and as required by the EM&V Policy Memo dated 10-21-21 which mentions baselines that should be used for electrification projects. In the two electrification project options we utilized new fuel oil boilers as the baseline since this measure is likely to be defined under the “major renovations / new equipment” measure type. 5.1 Upgrade Boilers to Gas-Fired Option Provide new, high-efficiency, gas-fired, condensing boilers, ERVs, and an air-cooled chiller utilizing the existing piping system will replace the existing oil-fired boiler system and HVs. The new central heating plant will contain gas-fired condensing boilers which will in turn lower heating water temperatures to 160°F with a 130°F return water temperature to take advantage of the higher efficiencies. The boilers will reuse the existing piping for heating, but new pumps with VFDs and new boiler plant appurtenances will be installed. The existing HVs will be replaced with Energy Recovery Ventilators (ERVs) with hot and chilled water coils and VFDs. The existing exhaust fans will be removed, but the existing roof penetration will be reused for the exhaust of the ERVs. In rooms where the existing FTRs and UHs are not sufficient to heat a room at the lower heating hot water temperatures, they will be replaced or additional FTRs will be added depending on the efficiencies. All UVs will be replaced with ECM fans (high efficiency, multi- speed fans) and coils for revised hot water temperatures. The UVs will include dedicated chilled water (CHW) coils for cooling. A new FTR or UH will be added in the library and the oil-fired domestic water heater will be replaced with a high efficiency gas-fired, condensing, domestic water Figure 13: Condensing Gas Boiler 5-2 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com heater. A cooling only, ducted fan coil system will be provided for the office area. Duct modifications will be made to the existing duct systems to accommodate the new systems. All existing controls of the air compressor will be removed, and all pneumatic controls will be replaced with Web based DDC controls with new front end/web enabled controls. The abandoned domestic water heater, oil tank, oil piping, and oil appurtenances will be removed from the premises. All of the pipe insulation will be removed and reinsulated with appropriate vapor barrier and thicknesses. The savings for this measure were calculated by using the industry standard energy modeling software eQUESTTM to help compare existing energy usage to the proposed energy efficient scenario which utilizes condensing natural gas boilers and a new DDC control system for energy management. Recommendations: • Boilers: Condensing gas-fired boilers equal to Lochinvar model FBN1501. Provie two units with an output of 1,443 MBH each (total of 2,200 MBH @ 66%). • Pumps: Two 7.5 HP pumps, lead/spare arrangement. • Chiller: Air cooled chiller equal to Trane model ACRB150. Provide two units with an output of 150 nominal tons (2,160 MBH) each (total of 300 tons @ 50%). • UV: Equal to Trane model VUV. Provide 40 units to replace the existing units and include HW heating and CHW cooling. Ventilation will be provided via the UVs. • ERV: Air handling units with energy recovery equal to Trane model CSAA semi-custom units. ERV to include HW and CHW coils, supply and exhaust fans, rotary style heat exchanger, and MERV 13 filters. New units will have similar airflows as the existing units being replaced. • 100% OA unit: The unit serving the kitchen will be a direct replacement. The air handling unit will include a HW heating coil, supply fan, and MERV 8 filters. • NOTE: This will require an upgraded electrical service to the facility. Option 1a as shown in Table 1 includes the upgrades to the heating system only. This would include condensing gas boilers, electrical service upgrades (without the generator), and removal of fuel oil tank only. 5.2 VRF with DOAS units (all electric) A VRF (variable refrigeration flow) system with Dedicated Outside Air Units (DOAS) will replace the existing heating and ventilation systems. The DOAS will provide ventilation to the spaces that are served by the indoor fan coil units (FCU) of the VRF system, specifically the office spaces and other internal spaces, to limit ductwork through the building. The FCUs will provide heating and cooling. Horizontal ducted FCUs will be used in ducted areas (main office area and interior rooms of addition) and f loor mounted units will be used in the classrooms to replace the existing UVs. The existing HV units in the gym and library will be replaced with ERVs with DX heat pump coils for heating and cooling. ERVs Figure 14: Chiller 5-3 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com dedicated to the classrooms provide outside air. Duct modifications will be made to the existing duct systems to accommodate the new systems. All existing controls of the air compressor will be removed, and all pneumatic controls will be replaced with electric/electronic controls with new front end/web enabled controls. The oil-fired domestic water heater will be replaced with a heat pump domestic water heater and the abandoned domestic water heater, oil tank, oil piping, and oil appurtenances will be removed from the premises. Figure 15: VRF Setup Recommendations: • DOAS: Air handling units with energy recovery equal to Trane model CSAA semi-custom units. DOAS to include DX coils for heating and cooling (heat pump), supply and exhaust fans, rotary style heat exchanger, and MERV 13 filters. • VRF: VRF will include several outdoor units, indoor units, branch controllers. VRF will be zoned (main office area, gym, library, cafetorium, interior rooms of addition, classrooms). Capacities of the outdoor condensing units (CU) will limit the size of each zone. o Indoor FCUS: Horizontal FCUs equal to Mitsubishi model PEFY. Floor standing FCUs equal to Mitsubishi model PFFY. Both unit types shall be heat pumps (DX). o Outdoor CUs: High efficiency heat recovery style heat pump equal to Mitsubishi model PURY-EP. • ERV (large): Air handling units with energy recovery equal to Trane model CSAA semi-custom units. ERV to include DX coils for heating and cooling (heat pump), supply and exhaust fans, rotary style heat exchanger, and MERV 13 filters. New units will have similar airflows as the existing units being replaced (gym, library, cafetorium). • ERV (small): Air handling units with energy recovery equal to Mitsubishi model RVX2 series. ERV to include supply and exhaust fans, plate style heat exchanger, and MERV 13 filters. • 100% OA unit: The unit serving the kitchen will be a direct replacement. The air handling unit will include an electric heating coil, supply fan, and MERV 8 filters. • NOTE: This will require an upgraded electrical service to the facility. 5.3 Air to Water Heat Pump Chiller (all electric) 5-4 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com The central heating and cooling plant will contain an outdoor heat pump chiller which will in turn lower heating water temperatures to 120°F with a 100°F return water temperature. The heat pump chiller will reuse the existing piping for heating and cooling. New pumps with VFDs and new central plant appurtenances will be installed. The existing HVs will be replaced with Energy Recovery Ventilators (ERVs) with hot and chilled water coils and VFDs. The existing exhaust fans will be removed, but the existing roof penetration will be reused for the exhaust of the ERVs. The existing FTRs will be replaced with fan coil units (FCU) and the UVs will be replaced with ECM fans (high efficiency, multi-speed fans) and coils for revised hot water temperatures. The UVs will include chilled water cooling. New FCUs with hot and chilled water coils will be added to the library. Duct modifications will be made to the existing duct systems to accommodate the new systems. The oil-fired domestic water heater will be replaced with a heat pump domestic water heater and the abandoned domestic water heater, oil tank, oil piping, and oil appurtenances will be removed from the premises. FCUs will be provided for the office area. A ll existing controls of the air compressor will be removed, and all pneumatic controls will be replaced with electric/electronic controls with new front end/web enabled controls. All of the pipe insulation will be removed and reinsulated with appropriate vapor barrier and thicknesses. Recommendations: • HW: Air to water modular heat pump chiller equal to Aermech model NYK. Provie twelve modules with an output of 204 MBH each (total of 2,200 MBH with 1 unit for redundancy). Capable of running down to -4°F and providing 120°F hot water. • Pumps: Two 7.5 HP pumps, lead/spare arrangement. • Chiller: Air to water modular heat pump chiller equal to Aermech model NYK. Provide twelve modules with an output of 26 nominal tons (312 MBH) each (total of 312 tons). • UV: Equal to Trane model VUV. Provide 40 units to replace the existing units and include HW heating and CHW cooling. Ventilation will be provided via the UVs. • ERV: Air handling units with energy recovery equal to Trane model CSAA semi-custom units. ERV to include HW and CHW coils, supply and exhaust fans, rotary style heat exchanger, and MERV 13 filters. New units will have similar airflows as the existing units being replaced. • 100% OA unit: The unit serving the kitchen will be a direct replacement. The air handling unit will include a HW heating coil, supply fan, and MERV 8 filters. • NOTE: This will require an upgraded electrical service to the facility. 5.4 Lighting Re-wiring As there were some dual classrooms which had lights operating when only one side was in use, there were opaque covers on the fixtures to reduce extra light output (for glare and light quality purposes). We recommend to re-wire the two sides of the classrooms to have individual light switches and as a result half of the light fixtures in each of these spaces could be removed, resulting in additional energy savings for the LED lights in those spaces. Figure 16: Heat Pump Chiller 5-5 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 5.5 Weatherization At this building there are limited areas to add insulation that would be cost-effective, due to rigid insulation being applied in the wall cavities and roof lines, however we recommend adding weatherstripping and door sweeps to all twenty-eight (28) exterior doors, especially where there are visible gaps. 6-6 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 6.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Applicable Codes (please refer to current versions during the design): • The Massachusetts State Building Code, ninth edition (780 CMR) and associated Stretch Code • The Massachusetts Plumbing and Gas code (248 CMR) • 2015 International Mechanical Code • 2018 International Energy Conservation Code • 2017 National Electric Code (NFPA 70) • ASHRAE Standard 62.1: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality • ASHRAE Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. HVAC design parameters should be based on ASHRAE Climatic Design Conditions 2017: • Winter outside design temperature o 12 degrees F • Summer outside design temperatures o 83 degrees F dry bulb, 75 degrees F wet bulb. • Inside design temperatures o 72 degrees F winter, 75 degrees F summer. Minimum ventilation rates based on ASHRAE 62.1-2019: • Offices/Break rooms o 5 CFM per person and 0.06 CFM per square foot • Classrooms o 10 CFM per person and 0.12 CFM per square foot Electrical engineering requirements in regards to the service: An electrical engineer is recommended to review the selected project and the existing electrical drawings to ensure that there are no additional requirements to achieve the electrical service required and to handle the increased electric load, as well as to make sure that all codes and safety requirements are met. For safety considerations and for code, the generator and automatic transfer switch should likely be replaced and upgraded, electric panels and service should be replaced. Eversource should be contacted as soon as possible to ensure there are no service limitations and additional costs associated with the electrical service are identified. Structural engineering: A structural engineer should review any additional roof -mount devices to ensure the roof has the capability to handle the increased load. Figure 17: Existing Electrical Service Panel 7-1 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 Conclusions As a result of this HVAC Feasibility Study, Weston & Sampson identified a few energy usage areas that could be optimized at the Stony Brook Elementary School. The current annual energy cost for the facility is about $117,000. If the recommended ECMs are implemented, the total savings could be on the order of up to $55,000 per year for upgrading the heating system, or about 47% energy cost savings. Hybrid Option: Although not included in this study, we recommend that a hybrid electric option and natural gas heating system be explored since that would reduce the incremental cost but get most of the benefits of a fully electric system. Table 3 – ECM Summary Table Measure Electricity Savings/ Impact (kWh) Fuel Oil Savings (gal) Natural Gas Impact (therm) Annual Cost Savings ($/yr) Project Cost ($) Estimated Simple Payback (years) 0) Upgrade Fuel Oil Boilers Only (MassSAVE baseline for Boilers upgrade measure) 0 2,783 N/A $8,373 $1,700,000 203 1a) Upgrade Boilers Only to Condensing Gas-Fired Option 0 47,309 -35,196 $55,393 $2,130,000 38 1b) Upgrade Boilers to Gas-Fired Option w/ Cooling -8,960 47,309 -35,196 $53,512 $7,851,358 146 2) VRF with DOAS units -366,550 47,309 N/A $13,614 $8,042,362 591 3) Air to Water Heat Pump Chiller -346,490 47,309 N/A $17,827 $9,083,038 509 4) Lighting Re-Wiring 4,277 N/A N/A $898 $12,000 13.3 5) Weatherization 18,173 N/A N/A $3,816 $28,000 7.3 Total -328,580 38,030 0 $22,541 $9,123,038 405 Note 1: Negative values are due to increases in consumption of those fuels Note 2: Option 0 is only presented to show the MassSAVE baseline scenario assuming a major renovations project of new fuel oil boilers, but is not recommended. Note 3: Option 1a shows the natural gas boiler upgrade, assuming no cooling or ventilation, and no generator since the generator is expected to be included with a project in 2023. Note 4: Totals include Option 3, 4, and 5 only. The HVAC options (1a, 1b, 2, and 3) cannot be implemented in conjunction with each other, we are assuming one central system will be designed for the entire building. Note 5: Measures 1a and 1b include an estimated additional cost of $30,000 for gas service to the site. Note 6: Measures 2 through 5 incentive source may vary depending on baseline and other factors. 7-2 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com 7.2 Energy Efficiency Program Incentives Weston & Sampson recommends applying for energy incentives through both Cape Light Compact and National Grid as prescriptive and/or custom incentives may be available to help off-set the investment costs of the ECMs described above. National Grid: ECM 1 only Cape Light Compact or National Grid: ECM’s 2-5 Rebates were not included in any of the costs above. Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com APPENDIX A Cost Estimation Details Concept Design Estimate   Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Prepared by:  Post Office Box 1988  North Falmouth, Ma 02556 www.tortoraconsulting.com p 781‐275‐5511 Prepared for: Weston & Sampson October 5, 2022 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 Option   Area $/sf Estimated  Construction Cost   92,000 $85.01 $7,821,358   92,000 $87.42 $8,042,362   92,000 $98.73 $9,083,038 QUALIFICATIONS ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED IN THIS ESTIMATE  All professional fees and insurance All Furnishings, Fixture, Equipment, Tele‐data and Security devices & wiring Items identified in the design as Not In Contract (NIC) Hazardous material or soil abatement  Special foundations or ledge blasting (unless indicated by design engineers) Utility company back charges, including work required off‐site Work to City streets and sidewalks, (except as noted in this estimate) Hazardous Material Abatement Sales Tax Building Permit Structural upgrades or new dunnage Interior finishes upgradess Roof replacement Phasing or off hours This estimate includes all direct construction costs, contractor’s overhead and profit and design contingency. Cost escalation assumes early  2023 bidding with summer construction. MAIN CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY Bidding conditions are expected to be Chapter 149 public bidding to pre‐qualified pre‐qualified contractors, open specifications for materials  and manufactures. We assume an occupied building, phased with normal working hours. The estimate is based on prevailing wage rates for construction in this market and represents a reasonable opinion of cost. It is not a  prediction of the successful bid from a contractor as bids will vary due to fluctuating market conditions, errors and omissions, proprietary  specifications, lack or surplus of bidders, perception of risk, etc. Consequently the estimate is expected to fall within the range of bids from a  number of competitive contractors or subcontractors, however we do not warrant that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the final  construction cost estimate. OPTION 2 (VRF with DOAS units ‐ all electric) This cost estimate was produced from concept documentation prepared by Weston & Sampson dated September 20, 2022.  OPTION 1 (Upgrade Boilers to Gas‐Fired) OPTION 3 (Air to Water Heat Pump Chiller ‐ all electric) Note: 5.4 Lighting Re‐wiring & 5.5 Weatherization scopes are  included in options Page 1 Executive Summary Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022   CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY IN CSI FORMAT OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3   DIV. 2    DEMOLTION 020500    Demolition  $0 $0 $0 025000    Sitework $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 DIV. 4    MASONRY 042000    Unit Masonry  $0 $0 $0 DIV. 5    METALS 055000    Metal Fabrications $0 $0 $0   DIV. 6    WOODS & PLASTICS   061000    Rough Carpentry $0 $0 $0 064020    Exterior Finish Carpentry $40,000 $40,000 $40,000   DIV. 7    THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION   072100   Thermal Insulation $0 $0 $0 072700   Air Barriers  $0 $0 $0 074600   Metal Siding $0 $0 $0 075400   Roofing and Flashing  $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 077200   Roof Accessories $0 $0 $0 078410    Penetration Firestopping $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 079200    Joint Sealants  $0 $0 $0   DIV. 8    DOORS & WINDOWS   081000   Doors, Frames and Hardware $26,600 $26,600 $26,600 085000   Exterior Windows  $0 $0 $0   DIV. 9    FINISHES   092110   Gypsum Board & Plaster Assemblies $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 095100   Acoustical Ceilings  $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 099000   Painting and Coatings $94,000 $94,000 $94,000   DIV. 21  FIRE SUPPRESSION   210000   Fire Suppression  $25,000 $25,000 $25,000   DIV. 22  PLUMBING   220000   Plumbing  $25,000 $25,000 $25,000   DIV. 23  HVAC   230000   HVAC  $2,662,550 $2,690,619 $3,326,506   DIV. 26  ELECTRICAL   260000   Electrical  $926,100 $1,018,100 $947,600 SUBTOTAL DIRECT (TRADE) COST $4,249,250 $4,369,319 $4,934,706 GC ‐ GENERAL CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS 20%$849,850 $873,864 $986,941 GL INSURANCE 1.5%$63,739 $65,540 $74,021 BONDS 2%$84,985 $87,386 $98,694 GC ‐ OVERHEAD AND PROFIT 8%$419,826 $431,689 $487,549 ESTIMATING CONTINGENCY 15%$850,148 $874,170 $987,287 ESCALATION / LOCATION / MARKET BIDDING CONDITIONS 20%$1,303,560 $1,340,394 $1,513,840 OPTION TOTALS $7,821,358 $8,042,362 $9,083,038 Page 2 CSI Summary Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate  October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 1 GROSS FLOOR AREA CALCULATION Building area 92,000 TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA)92,000 sf B20 EXTERIOR CLOSURE    B2020 WINDOWS & DOORS 08100 Add weatherstripping and door sweeps to exterior doors 28 loc 950.00 26,600                   06402 Unit ventilator interior and exterior modifications 40 ea 1,000.00 40,000                   SUBTOTAL 66,600                    TOTAL ‐ EXTERIOR CLOSURE $66,600 B30 ROOFING    B3010 ROOF COVERINGS 07540 Cutting and patching of roofing 1 ls 30,000.00 30,000                   SUBTOTAL 30,000                    TOTAL ‐ ROOFING $30,000 C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION C1010 PARTITIONS    07841 Allow for penetrations 1 ls 20,000.00 20,000                   09211 Allow for cutting and patching 1 ls 30,000.00 30,000                   SUBTOTAL  50,000                    TOTAL ‐ INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $50,000 C30 INTERIOR FINISHES C3010 WALL FINISHES 09900 Paint walls affected by construction 92,000 sf 0.75 69,000                   SUBTOTAL 69,000                    C3030 CEILING FINISHES 09211 Cutting and patching of GWB ceilings for access 10,000 sf 5.00 50,000                   09510 Cutting and patching of ACT ceilings for access 30,000 sf 4.00 120,000                 09900 Paint hard ceilings 10,000 sf 2.50 25,000                   SUBTOTAL 195,000                  TOTAL ‐ INTERIOR FINISHES $264,000    D20 PLUMBING   D20 PLUMBING   220000 Allow for for relocations and or support of HVAC system 1 ls 25,000.00 25,000 SUBTOTAL $25,000 TOTAL ‐ PLUMBING $25,000 Page 3 Option 1 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate  October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 1 D30 HVAC D30 HVAC  Demolition   230000 Cut, Cap, Make Safe 1 ls 10,000.00 10,000 230000 Remove & Dispose 1 ls 21,250.00 21,250 230000 Modifications of Existing Piping and Sheet Metal to  Accommodate New Equipment 1 ls 24,375.00 24,375 230000 Replace all Piping Insulation 92,000 sf 2.00 184,000  New Work   230000 Replacement/upgraded boilers (~2,800 MBH total output, 2x  1,400 MBH)2,800 mbh 28.50 79,800 230000 Hot Water Pumps ‐ 7.5 HP pumps 2 ea 5,250.00 10,500 230000 Connect to existing hot water piping system 1 ls 41,250.00 41,250 230000 Convert all 5 Heating/Ventilation Units to Energy Recovery  Ventilators (~50,000 cfm total) with hot and chilled water coils  and VFD’s (Trane model CSAA semi‐custom units) with rotary  heat exchanger and MERV 13 filters  2@11,000, 1@ 15,000, 2@  3,000 43,000 cfm 13.50 580,500 230000 Replace 40 existing unit ventilators with Trane model VUV units  including hot water heating and chilled water cooling  (ventilation provided via unit ventilators)  40 ea 5,187.50 207,500 230000 100% OA unit: direct replacement in kitchen, air handler will  include HW heating coil, supply fan, MERV 8 filters 4,700 cfm 20.00 94,000 230000 Remove existing exhaust fans but re‐use existing roof  penetrations for (3) ERVs ‐ 1300 cfm, 4000 cfm, 800 cfm 6,100 cfm 6.50 39,650 230000 Air cooled chiller (2x 150 ton chillers) – Trane model ACRB150 or  equivalent 300 ton 1,675.00 502,500 230000 Chilled Water connect to existing hot water piping system 1 ls 196,250.00 196,250 230000 Fine tube radiation will be replaced (assume 25%)50 lf 150.00 7,500 230000 Cooling only, ducted fan coil system for office area 5 ea 11,250.00 56,250 230000 DDC Energy Management System controls, complete new  system 92,000 sf 5.50 506,000 230000 Gas water heater storage (120 gallons)1 ea 5,125.00 5,125 230000 Start Up 80 hr 125.00 10,000 230000 Testing Adjusting & Balancing 120 hr 130.00 15,600 230000 Project Supervision 200 hr 125.00 25,000 230000 Coordination 200 hr 125.00 25,000 230000 Rigging 1 ls 20,500.00 20,500 SUBTOTAL 2,662,550              TOTAL ‐ HVAC $2,662,550 D40 FIRE PROTECTION D40 FIRE PROTECTION 210000 Head relocation as required 125 ea 200.00 25,000                   SUBTOTAL 25,000                    TOTAL ‐ FIRE PROTECTION $25,000 Page 4 Option 1 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate  October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 1 D50 ELECTRICAL D5010 SERVICE & DISTRIBUTION Service   260000 Service upgrade 1 ls 250,000.00 250,000                 260000 Panel replacements 16 ea 10,000.00 160,000                 260000 200 kW generator and new automatic switchgear 1 ls 150,000.00 150,000                 Power Equipment connections and feeders   260000 Boilers 2 ea 5,000.00 10,000                   260000 Pumps 2 ea 1,500.00 3,000                      260000 ERVs 3 ea 5,000.00 15,000                   260000 Chiller 2 ea 10,000.00 20,000                   260000 Uvs 40 ea 1,500.00 60,000                   260000 FCs 5 ea 1,500.00 7,500                      SUBTOTAL 675,500                  D5020 LIGHTING & POWER Light Fixtures 260000 Remove and reinstall lighting for new work 92,000 sf 1.00 92,000                   260000 Rewire classroom lighting with additional switching 30 ea 2,000.00 60,000                   SUBTOTAL 152,000                  D5030 COMMUNICATION & SECURITY SYSTEMS Fire Alarm   260000 Relocation of devices and added duct smokes 92,000 sf 0.30 27,600                   SUBTOTAL 27,600                    D5040 OTHER ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS Miscellaneous 260000 Temp Power and Lighting 92,000 sf 0.50                    46,000                   260000 Misc Demo, Removals 200 mh 125.00               25,000                   SUBTOTAL 71,000                    TOTAL ‐ ELECTRICAL $926,100 G10 SITEWORK G1010 SITEWORK 02500 Allow for ductbanks, pads and misc site modifications for new  work 1 ls 200,000.00 200,000                 SUBTOTAL 200,000                  TOTAL ‐ SITEWORK $200,000 Page 5 Option 1 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 2 GROSS FLOOR AREA CALCULATION Building area 92,000 TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA)92,000 sf B20 EXTERIOR CLOSURE B2020 WINDOWS & DOORS 08100 Add weatherstripping and door sweeps to exterior doors 28 loc 950.00 26,600                  06402 Unit ventilator interior and exterior modifications 40 ea 1,000.00 40,000                  SUBTOTAL 66,600                    TOTAL ‐ WINDOWS & DOORS $66,600 B30 ROOFING B3010 ROOF COVERINGS 07540 Cutting and patching of roofing 1 ls 30,000.00 30,000                  SUBTOTAL 30,000                    TOTAL ‐ ROOFING $30,000 C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION C1010 PARTITIONS  07841 Allow for penetrations 1 ls 20,000.00 20,000                  09211 Allow for cutting and patching 1 ls 30,000.00 30,000                  SUBTOTAL 50,000                    TOTAL ‐ INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $50,000 C30 INTERIOR FINISHES C3010 WALL FINISHES 09900 Paint walls affected by construction 92,000 sf 0.75 69,000                  SUBTOTAL 69,000                    C3030 CEILING FINISHES 09211 Cutting and patching of GWB ceilings for access 10,000 sf 5.00 50,000                   09510 Cutting and patching of ACT ceilings for access 30,000 sf 4.00 120,000                 09900 Paint hard ceilings 10,000 sf 2.50 25,000                   SUBTOTAL 195,000                  TOTAL ‐ INTERIOR FINISHES $264,000 D20 PLUMBING   D20 PLUMBING 220000 Allow for for relocations and or support of HVAC system 1 ls 25,000.00 25,000 SUBTOTAL $25,000 TOTAL ‐ PLUMBING $25,000 Page 6 Option 2 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 2 D30 HVAC D30 HVAC  Demolition   230000 Cut, Cap, Make Safe 1 ls 10,000.00 10,000 230000 Remove & Dispose 1 ls 21,250.00 21,250 230000 Modifications of Existing Piping and Sheet Metal to  Accommodate New Equipment 1 ls 24,375.00 24,375  New Work   230000 Convert all 6 Heating/Ventilation Units to Energy Recovery  Ventilators (~60,000 cfm total) and Dedicated Outdoor Air  System (DOAS) <‐ equivalent to Trane model CSAA semi‐ custom units (includes DX coils heat/cool (heat pump),  supply/exhaust fans, rotary heat exchanger, MERV 13 filters) 43,000 cfm 14.95 642,850 230000 (3) VRF Condensing Units 55 ton 1,725.00 94,875 230000 VRF Indoor Fan Coil Units 20 ea 2,937.50 58,750 230000 VRF Branch Controllers 3 ea 2,312.50 6,938 230000 Refrigerant piping ‐ Suction 150 lf 75.00 11,250 230000 Refrigerant piping ‐ Liquid 150 lf 32.50 4,875 230000 Refrigerant line Sets 20 ea 781.25 15,625 230000 Condensate Drain Piping 500 lf 38.50 19,250 230000 Piping Insulation 800 lf 12.75 10,200 230000 HV units in gym and library will be replaced with ERV’s with DX  heat pump coils for heating and cooling (CSAA semi‐custom  units include DX coils heat/cool (heat pump), supply/exhaust  fans, rotary heat exchanger, MERV 13 filters) 43,000 cfm 19.25 827,750 230000 ERV (smaller): AHU with energy recovery, Mitsubishi model  RVX2 (with supply/exhaust fans, plate heat exchanger, MERV  13 filters) 2 ea 3,062.50 6,125 230000 100% OA unit: direct replacement in kitchen, air handler will  include electric heating coil, supply fan, MERV 8 filters 4,700 cfm 20.00 94,000 230000 Replace fan coil units with packaged heat pump unit  ventilators (with ECM motors)40 ea 6,437.50 257,500 230000 DDC Energy Management System controls, complete new  system 92,000 sf 5.25 483,000 230000 Heat pump water heater 1 ea 5,906.25 5,906 230000 Start Up 80 hr 125.00 10,000 230000 Testing Adjusting & Balancing 120 hr 130.00 15,600 230000 Project Supervision 200 hr 125.00 25,000 230000 Coordination 200 hr 125.00 25,000 230000 Rigging 1 ls 20,500.00 20,500 SUBTOTAL 2,690,619              TOTAL ‐ HVAC $2,690,619 D40 FIRE PROTECTION D40 FIRE PROTECTION 210000 Head relocation as required 125 ea 200.00 25,000                   SUBTOTAL 25,000                    TOTAL ‐ FIRE PROTECTION $25,000 Page 7 Option 2 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 2 D50 ELECTRICAL D5010 SERVICE & DISTRIBUTION Service   260000 Service upgrade 1 ls 250,000.00 250,000                 260000 Panel replacements 16 ea 10,000.00 160,000                 260000 200 kW generator and new automatic switchgear 1 ls 150,000.00 150,000                 Power Equipment connections and feeders   260000 VRFs 55 ea 1,500.00 82,500                   260000 H&V conversions 6 ea 5,000.00 30,000                   260000 ERVs 2 ea 5,000.00 10,000                   260000 H&Vs 4 ea 5,000.00 20,000                   260000 OAs 1 ls 5,000.00 5,000                      260000 FCs 40 ea 1,500.00 60,000                   SUBTOTAL 767,500                  D5020 LIGHTING & POWER Light Fixtures 260000 Remove and reinstall lighting for new work 92,000 sf 1.00 92,000                   260000 Rewire classroom lighting with additional switching 30 ea 2,000.00 60,000                   SUBTOTAL 152,000                  D5030 COMMUNICATION & SECURITY SYSTEMS Fire Alarm   260000 Relocation of devices and added duct smokes 92,000 sf 0.30 27,600                   SUBTOTAL 27,600                    D5040 OTHER ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS Miscellaneous 260000 Temp Power and Lighting 92,000 sf 0.50                    46,000                   260000 Misc Demo, Removals 200 mh 125.00               25,000                   SUBTOTAL 71,000                    TOTAL ‐ ELECTRICAL $1,018,100 G10 SITEWORK G1010 SITEWORK 02500 Allow for ductbanks, pads and misc site modifications for new  work 1 ls 200,000.00 200,000                 SUBTOTAL 200,000                  TOTAL ‐ SITEWORK $200,000 Page 8 Option 2 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 3 GROSS FLOOR AREA CALCULATION Building area 92,000 TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA)92,000 sf B20 EXTERIOR CLOSURE B2020 WINDOWS & DOORS 08100 Add weatherstripping and door sweeps to exterior doors 28 loc 950.00 26,600                  06402 Unit ventilator interior and exterior modifications 40 ea 1,000.00 40,000                  SUBTOTAL 66,600                    TOTAL ‐ WINDOWS & DOORS $66,600 B30 ROOFING B3010 ROOF COVERINGS 07540 Cutting and patching of roofing 1 ls 30,000.00 30,000                  SUBTOTAL 30,000                    TOTAL ‐ ROOFING $30,000 C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION C1010 PARTITIONS  07841 Allow for penetrations 1 ls 20,000.00 20,000                  09211 Allow for cutting and patching 1 ls 30,000.00 30,000                  SUBTOTAL 50,000                    TOTAL ‐ INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $50,000 C30 INTERIOR FINISHES C3010 WALL FINISHES 09900 Paint walls affected by construction 92,000 sf 0.75 69,000                  SUBTOTAL 69,000                    C3030 CEILING FINISHES 09211 Cutting and patching of GWB ceilings for access 10,000 sf 5.00 50,000                   09510 Cutting and patching of ACT ceilings for access 30,000 sf 4.00 120,000                 09900 Paint hard ceilings 10,000 sf 2.50 25,000                   SUBTOTAL 195,000                  TOTAL ‐ INTERIOR FINISHES $264,000 D20 PLUMBING   D20 PLUMBING 220000 Allow for for relocations and or support of HVAC system 1 ls 25,000.00 25,000 SUBTOTAL $25,000 TOTAL ‐ PLUMBING $25,000 Page 9 Option 3 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 3 D30 HVAC D30 HVAC  Demolition   230000 Cut, Cap, Make Safe 1 ls 10,000.00 10,000 230000 Remove & Dispose 1 ls 21,250.00 21,250 230000 Modifications of Existing Piping and Sheet Metal to  Accommodate New Equipment 1 ls 24,375.00 24,375 230000 Replace all Piping Insulation 92,000 sf 2.00 184,000  New Work   230000 Air to Water modular heat pump chillers 312 ton 4,250.00 1,326,000 230000 Chilled water piping connect to existing hot water piping  system 1 ls 196,250.00 196,250 230000 Hot Water Pumps ‐ 7.5 HP pumps 2 ea 5,250.00 10,500 230000 Replace 40 existing unit ventilators with Trane model VUV  units including hot water heating and chilled water cooling  (ventilation provided via unit ventilators)  40 ea 5,187.50 207,500 230000 ERV’s with DX heat pump coils for heating and cooling (CSAA  semi‐custom units include DX coils heat/cool (heat pump),  supply/exhaust fans, rotary heat exchanger, MERV 13 filters)  2 ea 3,937.50 7,875 230000 100% OA unit: direct replacement in kitchen, air handler will  include HW heating coil, supply fan, MERV 8 filters 4,700 cfm 20.00 94,000 230000 Convert all 5 Heating/Ventilation Units to Energy Recovery  Ventilators (~50,000 cfm total) with hot and chilled water coils  and VFD’s (Trane model CSAA semi‐custom units) with rotary  heat exchanger and MERV 13 filters  2@11,000, 1@ 15,000,  2@ 3,000 43,000 cfm 13.50 580,500 230000 Cooling only, ducted fan coil system for office area 5 ea 11,250.00 56,250 230000 DDC Energy Management System controls, complete new  system 92,000 sf 5.50 506,000 230000 Heat pump water heater 1 ea 5,906.25 5,906 230000 Start Up 80 hr 125.00 10,000 230000 Testing Adjusting & Balancing 120 hr 130.00 15,600 230000 Project Supervision 200 hr 125.00 25,000 230000 Coordination 200 hr 125.00 25,000 230000 Rigging 1 ls 20,500.00 20,500 SUBTOTAL 3,326,506              TOTAL ‐ HVAC $3,326,506 D40 FIRE PROTECTION D40 FIRE PROTECTION 210000 Head relocation as required 125 ea 200.00 25,000                   SUBTOTAL 25,000                    TOTAL ‐ FIRE PROTECTION $25,000 Page 10 Option 3 Stony Brook School HVAC Options 384 Underpass Road Brewster, Ma Concept Design Estimate October 5, 2022 CSI UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST OPTION 3 D50 ELECTRICAL D5010 SERVICE & DISTRIBUTION Service   260000 Service upgrade 1 ls 250,000.00 250,000                 260000 Panel replacements 16 ea 10,000.00 160,000                 260000 300 kW generator and new automatic switchgear 1 ls 200,000.00 200,000                 Power Equipment connections and feeders   260000 Pumps 2 ea 1,500.00 3,000                      260000 ERVs 2 ea 5,000.00 10,000                   260000 H&V conversions 6 ea 5,000.00 30,000                   260000 ERVs 2 ea 5,000.00 10,000                   260000 H&Vs 4 ea 5,000.00 20,000                   260000 OAs 1 ls 5,000.00 5,000                      260000 WH 1 ea 1,500.00 1,500                      260000 FCs 5 ea 1,500.00 7,500                      SUBTOTAL 697,000                  D5020 LIGHTING & POWER Light Fixtures 260000 Remove and reinstall lighting for new work 92,000 sf 1.00 92,000                   260000 Rewire classroom lighting with additional switching 30 ea 2,000.00 60,000                   SUBTOTAL 152,000                  D5030 COMMUNICATION & SECURITY SYSTEMS Fire Alarm   260000 Relocation of devices and added duct smokes 92,000 sf 0.30 27,600                   SUBTOTAL 27,600                    D5040 OTHER ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS Miscellaneous 260000 Temp Power and Lighting 92,000 sf 0.50                    46,000                   260000 Misc Demo, Removals 200 mh 125.00               25,000                   SUBTOTAL 71,000                    TOTAL ‐ ELECTRICAL $947,600 G10 SITEWORK G1010 SITEWORK 02500 Allow for ductbanks, pads and misc site modifications for new  work 1 ls 200,000.00 200,000                 SUBTOTAL 200,000                  TOTAL ‐ SITEWORK $200,000 Page 11 Option 3 Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com APPENDIX B Equipment Datasheet Examples Registered under U.S. Patent #9,746,176 HIGH EFFICIENCYCOMMERCIAL BOILERS RIDE THE LOCHINVAR WAVE™ 12 MODELS FROM 750,000 TO 6.0 MILLION BTU/HR UP TO 96.2% THERMAL EFFICIENCY UP TO 25:1 TURNDOWN RATIO OPERATING CONTROL NOW AVAILABLE WITH REALTIME O2 FEEDBACK™ 100% Eff i c i e n c y % Water Return Temperature @ °F Efficiency @ 5% Efficiency @ 50% Efficiency @ 100% 85% 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 86% 87% 88% 89% 90% 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% 97% 98% 99% CREST BOILER EFFICIENCY SUPERIOR FIRE-TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER DESIGN BOOSTS THERMAL EFFICIENCY The CREST boiler takes fire-tube technology to a new level. The patented Wave configuration creates turbulence as flue gas products flow down the tube, scrubbing the energy from the flue products. The Wave design also enhances the life of the heat exchanger by allowing the tubes to flex, so they operate stress free with none of the adverse effects suffered by traditional fire-tube boilers. Each fire tube is welded into the heat exchanger and surrounded by water, and the heat transfer process is enhanced by the water’s counterflow. As water flows up inside the vessel, super- heated flue products flow down the fire tube. With one pass, heat is effectively captured, reaching condensing temperatures. At the top of the vessel, the combustion chamber is also water-backed for additional heat transfer. DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONSCREST HEATING BOILER Model Number Input MBH Turn- down Gross Output MBH Net AHRI Rating MBH Combustion Efficiency Thermal Efficiency A B C D E F G HMinMax FB*0751 50 750 15:1 722 628 96.4%96.2%78"30”55-1/2"57-5/8”66-1/8”11-7/8”11-3/8"11-1/4" FB*1001 50 999 20:1 961 836 96.4%96.2%78"30”56-1/2"57-5/8”66-1/8”11-7/8”11-3/8"11-1/4" FB*1251 62.5 1,250 20:1 1,203 1,046 96.4%96.2%78"30”56-1/2"57-3/4”66-1/8”11-7/8”11-3/8"11-1/4" FB*1501 60 1,500 25:1 1,443 1,255 96.4%96.2%78"30”67-3/4"68”65-3/8”12-3/8”11-3/8"11-1/4" FB*1751 70 1,750 25:1 1,684 1,464 96.4%96.2%78"30”66-1/4"68”65-3/8”12-3/8”11-3/8"11-1/4" FB*2001 80 1,999 25:1 1,923 1,672 96.4%96.2%78"30”66-1/2"68”65-3/8”12-3/8”11-3/8"11-1/4" FB*2501 125 2,500 20:1 2,400 2,087 96.1%96.0%77-3/4"35"83-3/4"83-3/4"63-3/4"13-1/2"11-1/4"10-1/2" FB*3001 150 3,000 20:1 2,883 2,507 96.1%96.0%77-3/4"35"83-3/4"83-3/4"63-3/4"13-1/2"11-1/4"10-1/2" FB*3501 175 3,500 20:1 3,364 2,925 96.1%96.0%77-3/4"42"91-1/2"86-3/4"63-1/2"13-1/4"11-1/2"10-3/4" FB*4001 333.3 3,999 12:1 3,843 3,342 96.1%96.0%77-3/4"45-1/2"103-1/2"99"63-1/2"13-3/4"11-1/2"10-3/4" FB*5001 499.9 4,999 10:1 4,804 4,177 96.1%96.0%77-3/4"46-1/2"102-1/4"99-1/2"63-1/2"15"11-1/2"10-3/4" FB*6001 600 6,000 10:1 5,766 5,014 96.1%96.0%77-3/4"50"102-3/4"99-3/4"63-1/4"14-3/4"11-1/2"10-3/4" SIDE BACK TOP Notes: *Insert “N” for natural gas, “L” for LP gas models. Indoor installation only. Lochinvar should be consulted before selecting a boiler for installations having unusual piping and pickup requirements, such as intermittent system operation, extensive piping systems, etc. The ratings have been determined under the provisions governing forced draft burners. The Net AHRI water ratings shown are based on a piping and pickup allowance of 1.15. FB*0751 51”13”8-3/4”26-3/4”23-3/4”49-1/2”7-3/8”1-1/4”3”6”6”1,768 1,560 FB*1001 51”13”8-3/4”26-3/4”23-1/8”49-1/2”6-1/2”1-1/4”3”6”6”1,838 1,596 FB*1251 51-3/8”13”8-3/4”26-3/4”21-5/8”49-1/2”6-1/2”1-1/2”3”6”8”1,975 1,648 FB*1501 62-3/8”15-7/8”9”26-7/8”27-7/8”59-1/4”5-1/8”1-1/2”4”8”8”2,307 1,961 FB*1751 61-1/2”15-7/8”9”27”27-1/8”58-3/4”5-1/8”1-1/2”4”8”8”2,458 2,017 FB*2001 61-1/2”15-7/8”9”27”26-3/4”58-3/4”5-1/8”1-1/2”4”8”8”2,570 2,087 FB*2501 76-1/4"19-3/4"9-1/4"28-3/4"32"71"7-1/4"2"4"8"9"3,600 2,577 FB*3001 76-1/4"19-3/4"9-1/4"28-3/4"32"71"7-1/4"2"4"10"10"3,900 2,881 FB*3501 82"20-1/4"12-3/4"35-1/2"31-3/4"73-1/4"8-3/4"2"4"10"10"4,600 3,218 FB*4001 94"24-3/4"13-1/2"39-1/2"42-1/4"85-1/4"10-1/2"2-1/2"4"12"12"5,200 3,805 FB*5001 92-1/2"22"14"39-3/4"39-1/2"84"9"2-1/2"6"14"14"5,900 4,101 FB*6001 93-1/4"20"15-3/4"43-1/2"36-1/2"83-3/4"9-1/4"3"6"14"14"6,900 4,711 Model Number L M N O P Q R Gas Conn. Water Air Inlet Vent Size Oper. Weight (lbs.) Ship. Weight (lbs.) Inlet/ Outlet For technical information call 800-722-2101. Lochinvar LLC reserves the right to make product changes or improvements without prior notice. Dimensions are approximate and should not be used for construction purposes. Lochinvar, LLC 300 Maddox Simpson Parkway Lebanon, Tennessee 37090 P: 615.889.8900 / F: 615.547.1000 Lochinvar.com iPhone and iPod touch are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Android and Google are trademarks of Google Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play is a service mark of Google Inc. FBNT-09 (Replace FBNT-08 5/2021) © Lochinvar, LLC - ASB - 1K 10/2021 - Printed in U.S.A. CREST BOILER DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS 0751-2001 G F E A L M P Q R C D H B N O Water IN Flue Vent Air Inlet Gas Connection Clean-Out Drain Water OUT Catalog 1650-8 Daikin Classroom Unit Ventilators Model AEQ Self-Contained Air Source Heat Pump Floor Units Size 024 (2 Ton) to 054 (4.5 Ton) MicroTech® and Electromechanical Controls (“J” Vintage) Model AEQ IntroduCtIon AHRI Performance Data – AEQ Unit Size Compressor Capacity Fan Speed Nominal Airflow Cooling Performance Heating Performance Total Capacity Efficiency Total Capacity Efficiency CFM Btuh EER Btuh COP 024 Full High 1000 21000 9 .7 19500 2 .98 036 Full High 1250 40000 10 .4 36100 2 .90 044 Full High 1500 43500 10 .0 42500 2 .90 054 Full High 1500 52000 10 .2 52300 2 .90 Notes: Cooling conditions: Indoor 80°F db/67°F wb-Outdoor; 95°F db/75°F wb and high-speed fan . Heating conditions: Indoor 70°F db/60°F wb-Outdoor; 47°F db/43°F wb and high-speed fan . C Since 1917 ... and setting the standard today CAT 1650-8 • AEQ SELF-CONTAINED UNIT VENTILATOR 4 www .DaikinApplied .com IntroduCtIon The Model AEQ Air Source Self- Contained Unit Ventilator Our model AEQ is a vertical, floor standing unit that utilizes refrigerant for cooling and heating . The Model AEQ is just right for new construction and for retrofit applications . Older buildings with baseboard radiant heat or other hydronic heating systems can be easily adapted to work efficiently with the model AEQ unit. The major features of this model are shown below and described in more detail on the following pages . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 7 MicroTech® controls (optional) • provide superior comfort control and easy integration into the building automation system of your choice 8 Advanced heat transfer coil • design provides extra capacity 9 Sturdy cabinet construction • includes hidden reinforcement, a non-glare textured surface, and a tough, scuff- and mar-resistant finish to stand up to the abuses of a classroom environment 10 Sectionalized front access panels • provide easy access to unit interior . Panels are easily removed by a single person . Front side panels can be removed while unit is running 11 Two hinged top access doors • provide easy access to the motor, electrical, and refrigeration components 12 Sampling chamber for unit- mounted sensor • provides accurate sensing of room temperature 13 Optional adjustable caster • (Left and Right Ends) 14 Insulated double-wall outdoor air damper • seals tightly without twisting 15 Full-length air filter • is efficient and easy to replace. All air delivered to classroom is filtered. 16 Sloped galvanized steel drain pan 17 Tamper resistant fasteners on access panels 1 Welded one- piece chassis • offers superior strength, durability, and vibration reduction 2 Unique draw-thru design • provides uniform air distribution across the coil for even discharge air temperatures 3 Quiet, aerodynamic fans • utilize GentleFlo technology for exceptionally quiet unit operation 4 Modular fan section • improves balance, alignment and simplifies maintenance 5 Fan motor • Located Out of Air Stream and away from heating coil reduces heat exposure to prolong life 6 Outside air/return air dampers & linkage • Provides superior mixture of outdoor air and room air for precise temperature control CAT 1650-8 • AEQ SELF-CONTAINED UNIT VENTILATOR 5 www .DaikinApplied .com FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) MODEL YLAA AIR-COOLED SCROLL CHILLERS WITH BRAZED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERSSTYLE B 40 tons to 230 tons 140 kW to 800 kW 60 Hz R-410A JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 2 Approvals • ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code – Section Vlll Division 1 • AHRI Standard 550/590 and 551/591 • UL 1995 – Heating and Cooling Equipment • ASHRAE 15 – Safety Code for Mechanical Refrigeration • ASHRAE Guideline 3 – Reducing Emission of Halogenated Refrigerants in Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Systems • NEC – National Electrical Code • OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Act Nomenclature YL A A 0125 H 46 X C B YL = YORK CHILLER A = AIR COOLED S = STANDARD EFFICIENCY H = HIGH EFFICIENCY REFRIGERANT = R-410A DESIGN SERIES A = DESIGN SERIES FOUR DIGIT UNIT NUMBER VOLTAGE CODE: 17 = 200-3-60 28 = 230-3-60 40 = 380-3-60 46 = 460-3-60 58 = 575-3-60 DEVELOPMENT LEVEL = B (BPHX)           FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 3 Table Of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................5 EQUIPMENT OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................................8 UNIT COMPONENTS ...........................................................................................................................................15 ACCESSORIES AND OPTIONS .........................................................................................................................16 DESIGN PARAMETERS ......................................................................................................................................20 WATER PRESSURE DROP.................................................................................................................................21 PHYSICAL DATA AND NOMINAL RATINGS ....................................................................................................22 PART LOAD RATINGS ........................................................................................................................................25 UNIT DIMENSIONS .............................................................................................................................................28 ISOLATOR LOCATIONS .....................................................................................................................................35 ISOLATOR DETAILS ...........................................................................................................................................38 ELECTRICAL NOTES..........................................................................................................................................41 VARIABLE SPEED PUMP ELECTRICAL DATA ...............................................................................................43 WIRING LUGS .....................................................................................................................................................44 ELECTRICAL DATA WITHOUT PUMPS ............................................................................................................46 WIRING DIAGRAM ..............................................................................................................................................52 USER CONTROL WIRING ..................................................................................................................................56 APPLICATION DATA ...........................................................................................................................................57 GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................................59 SI METRIC CONVERSION ..................................................................................................................................67 Performance data provided in this document was created in accordance with Johnson Controls software: YORKworks version 17.06 and DXCHILL version 8_02 JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 4 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 5 Johnson Controls, the building efficiency leader, is proud to present the YORK Model YLAA Air-Cooled Scroll Chiller. FEATURES AND BENEFITS Installation The YLAA chiller arrives as a factory-assembled package ready to be installed outdoors, either on the roof or at ground level. The air-cooled condensers eliminate the capital, in- stallation and maintenance costs of a cooling-tower circuit. The YLAA weighs less and has smaller footprint than other chillers in its class. In fact, it is 20% to 35% lighter weight than the market average chiller. When the chiller is roof-mount- ed in new construction, the cost of the support structure can be reduced. In building ret- rofits, the YLAA can provide the largest capacity in a given space and existing structure. Power hook-up could not be any easier with the standard single-point connection. A ter- minal block, disconnect switch or circuit breaker is provided to meet the unique needs of every project and minimize installation time and labor. The factory-installed control trans- former steps down the power voltage to the control voltage. Chilled-water piping is also simple. The water connections are factory-piped to the out- side of the unit, for ease of access. Factory-cut grooves, or optional flanges, make pip- ing connections simple. Optional factory-installed pump kits eliminate the time, cost, and mechanical-equipment room space necessary to install chilled-water pumps. Press the start button with confidence – your YLAA has been run-tested at the factory to ensure that you will have a successful start-up. Reliability The YLAA chiller is proven and reliable, designed to reduce service calls. The scroll com- pressors have logged hundreds of thousands of operating hours in numerous different applications. The corrosive-resistant condenser heat exchangers have been specifically designed for stationary HVAC applications and have undergone extensive laboratory and field testing to extend chiller life and improve performance. They are also more rigid than standard condenser coils, making them less susceptible to damage during rigging, lifting, and installation of the chiller. Components are designed to keep the chiller up-and-running. A factory-installed water strainer prevents debris from affecting unit flow and heat transfer. The rugged thermal- dispersion flow switch is factory-installed at the optimum location in the piping for su- perior flow sensing, reducing the potential for nuisance trips. Intelligent controls protect the chiller while keeping it online, for maximum uptime. Exterior panels of the chiller are powder-coated with highly durable corrosion-resistant paint. Introduction JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 6 Efficiency YLAA high-efficiency chillers, with their innovative control algorithms, offer industry-lead- ing energy efficiency. Real-world energy efficiency is measured by IPLV (off-design) per- formance, and YLAA chillers provide some of the best IPLVs in their class. YLAA also offers an efficiency choice. In addition to the high-efficiency units, YLAA chillers are available in standard efficiency models with smaller footprints and lower capital costs. Only pay for the chiller you need – the multi-efficiency levels of the YLAA allow you to decide the best investment for the job. Flexibility The YLAA chiller offers a number of options designed to operate reliably across a wide range of customer needs. It can cool glycol down to 10°F (-12°C). It can provide heat re- covery up to 140°F (60°C), with up to 85% of total heat rejection captured. When factory-mounted pump kits are considered, there are now more pump sizes to choose from. The optional kits come standard with valves, pressure ports, flow switch, and strainer for quick hook-up, and frost protection to prevent freeze-up. There are also more pump options available: variable-speed drives, dual pumps, service shut-off valves, expansion tanks, and additional test ports for temperature and pressure sensing. Standard low sound and multiple sound attenuation options allow flexibility in locating the chiller, and reduce the cost for field-constructed barriers. Sustainability The YLAA makes you a leader in sustainability through innovation, not added cost. With the combination of R-410A refrigerant, which has no ozone-depletion potential, and state- of-the-art heat exchanger technology that allows refrigerant charge to be reduced by as much as 30%, the YLAA chiller provides the most ecologically friendly equipment. Part- nered with its low-sound properties for noise pollution prevention, this chiller is a true earth-friendly offering. Introduction (Cont'd) FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 7 Communications The YLAA chiller comes standard with native communication capability for BACnet® (MS/ TP), Modbus®, and N2, with optional capabilities available for LON. The standard unit capabilities include built-in-scheduling, remote start-stop, remote water temperature reset and up to two steps of demand (load) limiting depending on model. The standard control panel can be directly connected to a Johnson Controls Building Automated System (BAS) through the standard factory-installed RS232 communication port. Serviceability Minimal maintenance is required to keep the unit operating at maximum performance. If service should ever be required, the YLAA chiller has been designed to simplify the work, keeping costs down. The layout of the chiller locates all the major components that can be serviced near the outside edge. The condenser heat exchangers are light enough that no crane is required for replacement and when it’s time to clean them, city tap water, with water pressure typical of a spray from a common garden hose, is all that’s needed. AHRI CERTIFICATION PROGRAM YORK YLAA chillers have been tested and certified by Air-Conditioning, Heating and Re- frigeration Institute (AHRI) in accordance with the latest edition of AHRI Standard 550/590 (I-P). Under this Certification Program, chillers are regularly tested in strict compliance with this Standard. This provides an independent, third-party verification of chiller perfor- mance. Refer to the AHRI site at www.ahrinet.org/ for complete Program Scope, Inclu- sions, and Exclusions as some options listed herein fall outside the scope of the AHRI certification program. For verification of certification, go to the AHRI Directory at www. ahridirectory.org. Rated in accordance with the latest issuance of AHRI Standard 550/590 and 551/591. Introduction (Cont'd) JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 8 Equipment Overview The 40 ton to 230 ton (140 kW to 800 kW) YLAA models are shipped complete from the factory ready for installa tion and use. The unit is pressure-tested, evacuated, and fully charged with a zero Ozone Depletion Potential Refrigerant R-410A and includes an initial oil charge. After assembly, a complete operational test is performed with water flowing through the evaporator to as sure that the refrigeration circuit operates correctly. The unit structure is heavy-gauge, galvanized steel. This galvanized steel is coated with baked-on powder paint, which, when subjected to ASTM B117 1000 hour, salt spray test- ing, yields a minimum ASTM 1654 rating of 6. Units are designed in accordance with NFPA 70 (National Electric Code), ASHRAE/ANSI 15 Safety code for mechanical refrig- eration, ASME and rated in accordance with AHRI Standard 550/590 and 551/591. COMPRESSORS The chiller has suction-gas cooled, hermetic scroll com pressors. The YLAA compressors in- corporate a compli ant scroll design in both the axial and radial direction. All rotating parts are statically and dynamically balanced. A large internal volume and oil reservoir provides greater liquid tolerance. Compressor-crankcase heaters are also included for extra protection against liquid migration. LD18425a FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 9 BRAZED PLATE EVAPORATOR The compact, high efficiency Brazed Plate Heat Exchanger (BPHE) is constructed with 316L stainless steel corrugated channel plates with a filler material between each plate. It offers excellent heat transfer performance with a compact size and low weight, reducing structural steel requirements on the job site. LD18426 The heat exchanger is manufactured in a precisely controlled vacuum-brazing process that allows the filler material to form a brazed joint at every contact point between the plates, creating complex channels. The arrangement is similar to older plate and frame technology, but without gaskets and frame parts. Water inlet and outlet connections are grooved for compatibility with field supplied ANSI/ AWWA C-606 couplings. A 40 mesh wye-strainer is provided as standard to provide protection at the evaporator inlet, particularly at system start-up when construction debris may be present in the piping system. The evaporator is equipped with a thermostat-controlled heater. The heater provides freeze protection for the evaporator down to -20°F (-29°C) ambient. The evaporator is covered with 3/4 in. flexible, closed-cell, foam insulation (K=0.25). A factory-wired flow switch is standard, installed in a pipe section at the outlet of the evaporator. Equipment Overview (Cont'd) JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 10 Equipment Overview (Cont'd) CANADIAN REGISTRATION NUMBER (CRN) APPLICATION AND PROOF OF CONFORMANCE All YLAA brazed plate evaporators are categorized as pressure H fittings in accordance with CSA-B51. TABLE 1 - CANADIAN REGISTRATION NUMBERS YLAA MODEL BPHE SERIES CRN 0041-0048 ACH240 0H19292.5C 0058-0175 ACH502 0H18281.5C 0200-0230 ACH1000 R4670.5C CONDENSER Coils – Condenser coils are made of a single material to avoid galvanic corrosion due to dissimilar metals. Coils and headers are brazed as one piece. Integral sub cooling is included. The design working pressure of the coil is 650 psig (45 barg). Condenser coil is easily washable with clear water up to 100 psi (7 bar). Fans – The condenser fans are composed of corrosion resistant aluminum hub and glass- fiber-reinforced poly propylene composite blades molded into a low-noise airfoil section. They are designed for maximum efficiency and are statically and dynamically balanced for vibration-free operation. They are directly driven by independent motors, and positioned for vertical air discharge. The fan guards are constructed of heavy-gauge, rust-resistant, coated steel. All blades are statically and dynamically balanced for vibration-free opera- tion. Motors – The fans are driven by Totally Enclosed Air-Over, squirrel-cage type, current pro- tected motors. They feature ball bearings that are double-sealed and permanently lu bricated. LD18427 LD18428 FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 11 Equipment Overview (Cont'd) UNIT CONTROL SYSTEM The YLAA chiller is designed with an intelligent control system that operates the chiller automatically with maximum reliability, safety, and ease of use. The controls are factory tested and the user only needs to enter a chilled liquid setpoint for the chiller to operate to meet the load demand. The control system includes native BACnet MS/TP, Modbus, and N2 communications, with LON protocol served through an optional E-Link communications card. The operating program is stored in non-volatile memory (EPROM), so power failures and battery discharge will not require reprogramming the chiller. Programmed setpoints are retained in lithium battery-backed RTC memory for five years minimum. Unit alarm contacts are standard. Contacts for remote chilled liquid temperature reset and two steps of demand load limiting are also standard, for projects without BAS or for redundancy. FUSES ON/OFF SWITCH TERMINAL BLOCK CONTROL TRANSFORMER MICROBOARD KEYPAD LD18429 Maximum reliability is achieved through intelligent control. Run hours and starts are av- eraged across all compressors automatically, and between both pumps of the optional dual pump hydro-kit. When compressors are cycled off, an anti-recycle timer ensures the motors have time to cool before starting again, for the maximum service life. At unit shut- down, the unit pumps down automatically to prevent liquid refrigerant from entering the compressors at restart, which can cause premature bearing wear and other compressor damage. Liquid temperature sensors provide feedback to the controller, and logic predicts when additional capacity will be required based on how quickly the unit has loaded or unloaded in the past. This prevents unnecessary compressor cycling and helps maintain setpoint accurately. If there is a problem that prevents the unit operating properly, the controls are designed to allow the unit to operate safely while making as much capacity as possible. For example, if airflow to the condenser coil is diminished due to a dirty coil, the chiller will unload slightly to provide maximum capacity possible while remaining within the unit operating envelope. DISPLAY JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 12 If a fault prevents the unit from starting or causes it to shutdown, the chiller will attempt to restart three times. If it cannot start, a manual reset is required to alert the operator about the fault condition. The fault history is stored in the unit controller RTC memory for the last six fault shutdown conditions. An RS-232 port provides capability to print hard copy reports (printer available separately). All controls are contained in a NEMA 3R cabinet with a hinged outer door and includes a liquid crystal display (LCD) with light emitting diode (LED) backlighting for outdoor view- ing. There are two display lines, each with 20 text characters per line, and a color coded 12-button non-tactile keypad with sections for display, entry, and printing. DISPLAY/PRINT provides quick access to frequently needed information: • Chilled liquid temperatures • Ambient temperature • System pressures (each circuit) • Operating hours and starts (each compressor) • Operating data for the systems ENTRY section allows entering setpoints or modifying system values. SETPOINTS updating can be performed to: • Chilled liquid temperature setpoint and range • Remote reset temperature range • Set daily schedule/holiday for start/stop • Manual override for servicing • Low and high ambient cut-outs • Number of compressors • Low liquid temperature cut-out • Low suction pressure cut-out • High discharge pressure cut-out • Anti-recycle timer (compressor start cycle time) • Anti-coincident timer (delay compressor starts) UNIT section provides the following options: • Set time • Set unit options In addition, the microprocessor control center displays the following data points: • Return and leaving liquid temperature • Low leaving liquid temperature cut-out setting Equipment Overview (Cont'd) FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 13 Equipment Overview (Cont'd) • Low ambient temperature cut-out setting • Outdoor air temperature • English or Metric data • Suction pressure cut-out setting • Each system suction pressure • Discharge pressure (optional) • Anti-recycle timer status for each system • Anti-coincident system start timer condition • Compressor run status • No cooling load condition • Day, date, and time • Daily start and stop times • Holiday status • Automatic or manual system lead and lag control • Lead system definition • Compressor starts and operating hours (each compressor) • Status of hot gas valves, evaporator heater, and fan operation • Run permissive status • Number of compressors running • Liquid solenoid valve status • Load and unload timer status • Water pump status COMMUNICATIONS • Native communication capability for BACnet (MS/TP), Modbus, and N2 • Optional communication available for LON via E-Link option BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM INTERFACE In addition to native BACnet, Modbus, and N2, the YLAA chiller accepts a 4 mA to 20 mA or 0 VDC to 10 VDC input to reset of the leaving chilled liquid temperature. The standard unit capabilities include remote start-stop, remote water temperature reset via up to two steps of demand (load) limiting depending on model. The standard control panel can be directly connected to a Johnson Controls BAS through the standard on-board RS232 communication port. (Factory- installed) JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 14 For connection with Johnson Controls Connected Services, an optional interface card (SC-EQUIP) is required and may be factory installed for easier field commissioning. Addi- tional hardware (SC-AP access point), field provided, must be installed remotely from the chiller to interface with the Connected Services remote operations center. Contact your local Johnson Controls office to learn more about Connected Service and to schedule installation during chiller commissioning. POWER PANEL Each panel contains: • Compressor power terminals • Compressor motor starting contactors in accordance with the lEC. • Control power terminals to accept incoming for 115-1-60 control power • Fan contactors and overload current protection The power wiring is routed through liquid-tight conduit to the compressors and fans. Equipment Overview (Cont'd) FAN FUSE FAN CONTACTORS DISCONNECT SWITCH FAN FUSE FAN CONTACTORS FAN CONTACTORS COMPRESSOR CONTACTORS GROUND LUG COMPRESSOR CONTACTORS FAN CONTACTORS XTBF1 LD18430A FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 15 Unit Components FIGURE 1 - GENERAL UNIT COMPONENTS FAN DECK MICROCHANNNEL COILS COIL HEADERS CONTROL AND POWER PANELS COMPRESSORS BRAZED PLATE EVAPORATOR FORMED STEEL BASE RAILS HYDRO-KIT PUMPS AND MOTORS (OPTIONAL) LD18426 JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 16 Accessories and Options All options are factory installed unless otherwise noted. POWER OPTIONS: Unit power connections – Single-point terminal block connections are provided as stan- dard. The following power connections are available as options. See "Electrical Data With- out Pumps" on page 46 for specific voltage and options availability. Single-point supply terminal block – Includes enclosure, terminal-block, and intercon- necting wiring to the compressors. Separate external protection must be supplied, by oth- ers, in the incoming compressor-power wiring. Do not include this option if either the Single- Point Non-Fused Disconnect Switch or the Single-Point Circuit Breaker options have been included. Single-point non-fused disconnect switch – Unit-mounted disconnect switches with ex- ternal, lockable handle (in compliance with Article 440-14 of NEC) can be supplied to isolate the unit power voltage for servicing. Separate external fusing must be supplied, by others in the power wiring, which must comply with the National Electrical Code and local codes. Single-point circuit breaker – A unit mounted circuit breaker with external, lockable handle (in compliance with NEC Article 440-14), can be supplied to isolate the power voltage for servicing. This option includes the Single-Point Power connection. Multiple point supply with individual system circuit breakers – Two unit-mounted cir- cuit breakers, with external lockable handles (in compliance with NEC Article 440-14), can be supplied to isolate the power voltage for servicing. (SQ only) Control transformer – Converts unit power voltage to 115-1-60 (0.5 kVA or 1.0 kVA capac- ity). Factory mounting includes primary and secondary wiring between the transformer and the control panel. Power factor correction capacitors – Will correct unit compressor power factors to a 0.90 to 0.95. CONTROL OPTIONS: High ambient kit – Allows units to operate when the ambient temperature is above 115°F (46°C). Includes sun shield panels and discharge pressure transducers. Low ambient kit – Standard units will operate to 30°F (-1°C). This accessory includes all necessary components to permit chiller operation to 0°F (-18°C). (This option includes the discharge pressure transducer /readout capability option.) For correct head pressure control in applications below 30°F (-1°C) where wind gusts may exceed 5 mph, the optional con- denser louvered enclosure panels must also be included. Language LCD and keypad display – Spanish, French, German, and Italian unit LCD controls and keypad display available. Standard language is English. FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 17 COMPRESSOR, PIPING, EVAPORATOR OPTIONS: Low temperature glycol – Replaces standard Thermostatic Expansion Valves with Elec- tronic Expansion Valves to achieve leaving glycol temperatures as low as 10°F (-12°C). Required for any leaving liquid temperature below 30°F (-1°C). Electronic Expansion Valves permit operation at both low temperatures and comfort cooling applications without a capac- ity loss or derate at either condition. Chicago code relief valves – Unit will be provided with relief valves to meet Chicago code requirements. Service suction isolation valve – Service suction discharge (ball-type) isolation valves are added to unit per system (discharge service ball-type isolation valve is standard on each circuit). Hot gas by-pass – Permits continuous, stable operation at capacities below the minimum step of compressor unloading to as low as 5% capacity (depending on both the unit and operating conditions) by introducing an artificial load on the evaporator. Hot gas by-pass is installed on only refrigerant system #1. Thermal dispersion flow switch – A thermal dispersion type flow switch provides accu- rate, low maintenance flow proving and is included standard. It is factory wired and installed in the extension pipe between evaporator outlet and edge of chiller. The extension pipe is secured to the chiller frame for shipping to avoid risk of damage to evaporator and is easily attached to the evaporator at startup using the supplied ANSI/AWWA C-606 connector. The flow switch can be deleted if alternate or existing flow switch is field supplied. Evaporator nozzle extension kit – Pipe and ANSI/AWWA C-606 fittings to extend the evaporator connections to the outside of the chiller. Includes the Thermal Dispersion Flow Switch. Provided as standard on all chillers but can be deleted if alternate or existing pip- ing and flow switch is field supplied. The extension pipe is secured to the chiller frame for shipping to avoid risk of damage to evaporator and is easily attached to the evaporator at startup using the supplied ANSI/AWWA C-606 connector. A support bracket for the exten- sion kit or field piping is standard on all chillers. Extension kit insulation and heat trace to be field provided if required. Heat recovery condenser – A partially condensing refrigerant to liquid condenser recov- ers heat off both refrigerant circuits and rejects into a single liquid circuit. Factory installed between the compressor discharge and the condenser (air) coils to capture the maximum amount of heat. Capable of recovering up to 85% total heat of rejection (cooling load plus work input); temperatures as high as 140°F (60°C) are possible. Hydro-kit – Factory installed Hydro-Kit suitable for water glycol systems with up to 35% glycol at leaving temperatures down to 20°F (-6.7°C). The hydro-kit option is available in a single or dual configuration (dual as standby duty only), with totally enclosed permanently lubricated pump motors. The hydro-kit comes standard with a variable speed drive, a balancing valve, discharge check valve, discharge shutoff valve, thermal dispersion flow switch, pressure ports, inlet wye-strainer, bleed and drain valves, and frost protection. Service shut off valves, additional pressure ports, and taps for the expansion tank are op- tional within the hydro-kit option. Expansion tanks are available by request. Accessories and Options (Cont'd) JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 18 CONDENSER AND CABINET OPTIONS: Condenser coil protection against corrosive environments is available by choosing any of the following options. For additional application recommendations, refer to Form 150.12-ES1. Environment guard premium – Microchannel condenser coils coated with an elec- tro-deposited and baked flexible epoxy coating that is finished with a polyurethane UV resistant top-coat. Environment guard basic – Microchannel condenser coils treated with immersion bath-applied chemical treatment. Microchannel condenser is provided with a 5-year warranty against corrosion damage. Enclosure panels (Unit) – Tamperproof enclosure panels prevent unauthorized access uto units. Enclosure panels can provide an aesthetically pleasing alternative to expensive fencing. Additionally, for proper head pressure control, Johnson Controls recommends the use of Condenser Louvered Panels for winter applications where wind gusts may exceed 5 mph (8 kph). The following types of enclosure panels are available: Wire panels (full unit) – Consists of welded wire-mesh guards mounted on the ex- terior of the unit. Prevents unauthorized access, yet provides free air flow. Wire/louvered panels – Consists of welded wire-mesh panels on the bottom part of unit and louvered panels on the condenser section of the unit. Louvered panels (condenser coil only) – Louvered panels are mounted on the sides and ends of the condenser coils for protection. Louvered panels (full unit) – Louvered panels surround the front, back, and sides of the unit. They prevent unauthorized access and visually screen unit components. Unrestricted air flow is permitted through generously sized louvered openings. This option is applicable for any outdoor design ambient temperature up to 115°F (46°). Coil end hail guard – Louvered panel attached to exposed coil end. Accessories and Options (Cont'd) FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 19 SOUND ATTENUATION: One or both of the following sound attenuation options are recommended for residential or other similar sound sensitive locations. Compressor acoustic sound blanket – Each compressor is individually enclosed by an acoustic sound blanket. The sound blankets are made with one layer of acoustical absor- bent textile fiber of 5/8 in. (15 mm) thickness; one layer of heavy duty anti-vibration material thickness of 1/8 in. (3 mm). Both are closed by two sheets of welded PVC, reinforced for temperature and UV resistance. Ultra-quiet fans – Lower RPM, 8-pole fan motors are used with steeper-pitch fans. Variable speed fans – Controls all the fans on the circuit. There is a drive installed for each circuit. Available on both low sound and ultra-quiet fans. VIBRATION ISOLATION Vibration isolators – Level adjusting, spring type 1 in. (25.4 mm), 2 in. (50.8 mm) deflec- tion, or neoprene isolators for mounting under unit base rails. (Field installed) Accessories and Options (Cont'd) JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 20 NOMINAL EVAPORATOR WATER FLOW YLAA TEMPERATURE (°F)WATER FLOW (GPM)AIR ON CONDENSER (°F) MIN1 MAX2 MIN MAX MIN3 MAX4 STANDARD EFFICIENCY 0070SE 40 55 60 285 -10 125 0080SE 40 55 100 355 -10 125 0089SE 40 55 100 385 -10 125 0100SE 40 55 100 385 -10 125 0120SE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 0136SE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 0155SE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 0170SE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 HIGH EFFICIENCY 0041HE 40 55 41 224 -10 125 0048HE 40 55 48 224 -10 125 0058HE 40 55 60 285 -10 125 0065HE 40 55 60 285 -10 125 0082HE 40 55 100 385 -10 125 0092HE 40 55 100 385 -10 125 0101HE 40 55 100 385 -10 125 0125HE 40 55 100 385 -10 125 0139HE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 0156HE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 0175HE 40 55 150 625 -10 125 0200HE 40 55 230 625 -10 125 0230HE 40 55 230 650 -10 125 NOTES: 1. For leaving liquid temperature below 40°F (4°C) (to 10°F [-12°C]) an optional low temperature glycol kit is required. Contact your nearest Johnson Controls Office for application requirements. 2. For leaving liquid temperature higher than 55°F (13°C), contact the nearest Johnson Controls Office for application guidelines. 3. The evaporator is protected against freezing to -20°F (-29°C) with an electric heater as standard. 4. For operation at temperatures below 30°F (-1°C), install the optional Low Ambient Kit on the system. 5. For operation at temperatures below 0°F (-18°C), install the optional Low Ambient Kit with Variable Speed Fans on the system. Design Parameters FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 21 Water Pressure Drop EVAPORATOR YLAA MODELS A 0058HE, 0065HE, 0070SE B 0080SE C 0082HE, 0089SE, 0100SE, 0092HE, 0101HE, 0125HE D 0136SE, 0139HE, 0170SE, 0156HE E 0120SE, 0155SE F 0175HE G 200HE H 230HE I 0048HE J 0041HE YLAA EVAPORATOR PRESSURE DROP CURVE LD28292 YLAA Evaporator Pressure Dop (IP Units) Wa t e r P r e s s u r e D r o p ( p s i ) Water Flow Rate (gpm) A B C D E F G H I J 10 110 210 310 410 510 610 710 5 0 10 15 25 20 30 35 40 45 JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 22 Physical Data and Nominal Ratings REFRIGERANT R-410A YLAA STANDARD EFFICIENCY UNITS 0070SE 0080SE 0089SE 0100SE 0120SE 0136SE 0155SE 0170SE NOMINAL RATINGS TONS 71.0 77.8 81.8 95.6 118.1 126.1 143.0 167.4 KW 77.5 86.3 93.0 111.5 134.6 142.6 165.0 192.1 EER 10.4 10.0 9.8 9.7 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.7 IPLV 16.1 15.6 15.8 14.5 15.0 15.8 15.8 15.6 GENERAL UNIT DATA Length, in.116.1 116.1 116.1 142.7 142.7 187.7 187.7 232.7 Width, in.88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Height, in.94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.0 94.2 94.2 94.2 Number of Refrigerant Circuits 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 REFRIGERANT CHARGE, OPERATING R-410A, Circuit 1 / Circuit 2, lb 43/43 47/44 57/57 55/58 54/62 75/71 75/70 90/87 Oil Charge, Circuit 1 / Circuit 2, gal 2.58/2.58 3.28/2.58 3.28/2.76 3.28/3.33 3.33/3.33 4.99/2.76 4.99/3.33 4.99/4.99 Shipping Weight, lb 3578 3898 4168 4791 5183 6148 6414 7734 Operating Weight, lb 3623 3954 4241 4864 5293 6232 6524 7818 COMPRESSORS, SCROLL TYPE Compressors per circuit 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/2 2/2 3/3 3/2 3/3 Compressors per unit 6 6 6 5 4 6 5 6 NOMINAL TONS PER COMPRESSOR Circuit 1 13 15 15 15 32 32 32 32 Circuit 2 13 13 15 32 32 15 32 32 CONDENSER Total Face Area ft2 106.9 106.9 106.9 133.6 160.3 213.8 213.8 267.2 Number of Rows 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fins per in.20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 CONDENSER FANS, LOW SOUND Number of Fans, Circuit 1/Circuit 2 2/2 2/2 2/2 3/2 3/3 4/4 4/4 5/5 Fan, hp 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Fan rpm 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 Total Chiller, cfm 60000 60000 60000 75000 90000 120000 120000 150000 EVAPORATOR Water Volume, gal 5.4 6.7 8.8 8.8 13.2 10.0 13.2 10.0 Maximum Water Side Pressure, psig 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Maximum Refrigerant Side Pressure, psig 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Minimum Chiller Water Flow Rate, gpm 60 100 100 100 150 150 150 150 Maximum Chiller Water Flow Rate, gpm 285 355 385 385 625 625 625 625 Water Connections Size, inches 3 3 3 3 3 4*4*4* * Side extension kit (standard), evaporator nozzle remains 3 in. FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 23 Physical Data and Nominal Ratings (Cont'd) REFRIGERANT R-410A YLAA HIGH EFFICIENCY UNITS 0041HE 0048HE 0058HE 0065HE 0082HE 0092HE NOMINAL RATINGS TONS 39.5 48.9 57.0 62.3 77.9 85.7 KW 34.1 47.0 57.7 65.2 90.9 83.6 EER 11.6 10.9 10.6 10.4 10.3 11.0 IPLV 16.7 15.7 15.6 15.6 16.1 16.1 ENERAL UNIT DATA Length, in.100.2 100.2 100.2 100.2 100.2 142.7 Width, in.88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88 Height, in.94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 Number of Refrigerant Circuits 2 2 2 2 2 2 REFRIGERANT CHARGE, OPERATING R-410A, Circuit 1 / Circuit 2, lb 40/40 40/42 43/43 43/43 44/44 59/55 Oil Charge, Circuit 1 / Circuit 2, gal 0.86/0.86 0.86/0.86 2.58/2.58 2.89/2.58 2.58/2.58 2.76/2.76 Shipping Weight, lb 3855 3724 3508 3704 4213 4718 Operating Weight, lb 3877 3754 3552 3748 4295 4791 COMPRESSORS, SCROLL TYPE Compressors per circuit 2/2 2/2 2/2 3/2 3/3 3/3 Compressors per unit 4 4 4 5 6 6 NOMINAL TONS PER COMPRESSOR Circuit 1 10 13 15 13 15 15 Circuit 2 10 13 15 15 13 15 CONDENSER Total Face Area ft2 106.9 106.9 106.9 106.9 106.9 160.3 Number of Rows 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fins per in.20 20 20 20 20 20 CONDENSER FANS, LOW SOUND Number of Fans, Circuit 1/Circuit 2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 3/3 Fan, hp 2 2 2 2 2 2 Fan, rpm 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 Total Chiller, cfm 26800 60000 60000 60000 60000 90000 EVAPORATOR Water Volume, gal 2.6 3.6 5.4 5.4 10 8.8 Maximum Water Side Pressure, psig 150 150 150 150 150 150 Maximum Refrigerant Side Pressure, psig 450 450 450 450 450 450 Minimum Chiller Water Flow Rate, gpm 41 48 60 60 100 100 Maximum Chiller Water Flow Rate, gpm 224 224 285 285 385 385 Water Connections Size, inches 3 3 3 3 3 3 * Side extension kit (standard), evaporator nozzle remains 3 in. JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 24 Physical Data and Nominal Ratings (Cont'd) REFRIGERANT R-410A YLAA HIGH EFFICIENCY UNITS 0101HE 0125HE 0139HE 0156HE 0175HE 0200HE 0230HE NOMINAL RATINGS TONS 98.3 116.0 126.1 144.5 172.5 194.5 220.6 KW 106.1 122.0 149.6 153.0 194.2 210.9 240.0 EER 10.1 10.3 10.1 10.2 9.8 10.1 10.2 IPLV 15.7 15.7 16.0 15.5 15.6 16.1 15.6 GENERAL UNIT DATA Length, in.142.7 187.7 187.7 232.7 232.7 274.4 274.4 Width, in.88 88 88 88 88 88.3 88.3 Height, in.94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 Number of Refrigerant Circuits 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 REFRIGERANT CHARGE, OPERATING R-410A, Circuit 1 / Circuit 2, lb 45/65 75/71 76/76 90/82 94/92 95/95 100/100 Oil Charge, Circuit 1 / Circuit 2, gal 3.28/3.33 3.33/3.33 4.20/2.80 4.99/3.33 4.99/4.99 4.2/4.2 4.99/4.99 Shipping Weight, lb 4953 5869 6386 7344 7882 9205 9690 Operating Weight, lb 5026 5942 6488 7428 8001 9333 9821 COMPRESSORS, SCROLL TYPE Compressors per circuit 3/2 2/2 3/2 3/2 3/3 3/3 3/3 Compressors per unit 5 4 5 5 6 6 6 NOMINAL TONS PER COMPRESSOR Circuit 1 15 32 25 32 32 35 40 Circuit 2 32 32 32 32 32 35 40 CONDENSER Total Face Area ft2 160.3 213.8 213.8 267.2 267.2 320 320 Number of Rows 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fins per in.20 20 20 20 20 20 20 CONDENSER FANS, LOW SOUND Number of Fans, Circuit 1/Circuit 2 4/2 4/4 4/4 6/4 5/5 6/6 6/6 Fan hp 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Fan RPM 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 1160 Total Chiller CFM 90000 120000 120000 150000 150000 180000 180000 EVAPORATOR Water Volume, gal 8.8 8.8 13.2 10.0 14.3 12.6 14.3 Maximum Water Side Pressure, PSIG 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Maximum Refrigerant Side Pressure, PSIG 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Minimum Chiller Water Flow Rate, GPM 100 100 150 150 150 230 230 Maximum Chiller Water Flow Rate, GPM 385 385 625 625 625 625 650 Water Connections Size, Inches 3 4*4*4*4*5 5 * Side extension kit (standard), evaporator nozzle remains 3 in. FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 25 STANDARD EFFICIENCY Part Load Ratings YLAA0070SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 71.0 75.5 95.0 10.4 83.3 62.8 56.2 88.1 12.0 66.7 53.7 39.4 80.4 14.0 50.0 42.1 26.4 70.5 16.0 33.3 29.2 15.6 59.6 18.5 16.7 14.4 7.4 55.0 19.1 IPLV 16.1 YLAA0080SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 77.8 86.3 95.0 10.0 83.6 69.5 68.2 88.6 11.1 66.7 59.2 46.2 80.6 13.4 50.3 47.3 32.3 71.5 15.2 33.3 32.0 17.9 59.7 18.1 16.9 16.9 9.1 55.0 18.9 IPLV 15.6 YLAA0089SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 81.8 93.0 95.0 9.8 83.3 72.6 69.7 88.2 11.4 66.7 62.3 48.7 80.7 13.5 50.0 49.1 31.8 71.0 15.3 33.3 33.3 18.5 59.1 18.3 16.7 16.4 8.6 55.0 19.1 IPLV 15.8 YLAA0100SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 95.6 111.5 95.0 9.7 86.1 86.5 88.5 89.3 10.7 57.0 64.5 45.4 75.5 14.4 43.0 47.4 34.4 64.7 15.1 13.9 16.0 8.5 55.0 18.7 IPLV 14.5 YLAA0120SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 118.1 134.6 95.0 9.8 75.0 96.6 84.1 84.1 12.3 50.0 71.0 43.1 71.1 16.0 25.0 33.0 22.0 55.0 16.7 IPLV 15.0 YLAA0136SE %DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 126.1 142.6 95.0 9.7 83.3 108.0 91.9 86.4 12.2 66.7 95.7 73.7 80.5 13.3 50.0 67.3 41.5 67.0 16.6 33.3 52.1 27.8 59.8 18.0 16.7 35.0 18.4 55.0 19.1 IPLV 15.8 YLAA0155SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 143.0 165.0 95.0 9.7 80.0 127.2 112.3 87.3 11.9 60.0 101.5 71.3 76.7 14.1 40.0 70.0 41.0 63.8 17.6 20.0 35.0 18.4 55.0 18.9 IPLV 15.8 YLAA0170SE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 167.4 192.1 95.0 9.7 83.3 148.5 142.3 88.2 11.2 66.7 127.9 98.8 80.8 13.3 50.0 101.5 64.3 71.4 15.0 33.3 69.5 38.9 59.9 18.3 16.7 34.5 18.2 55.0 19.2 IPLV 15.6 JOHNSON CONTROLS FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) 26 HIGH EFFICIENCY YLAA0041HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 39.5 34.1 95.0 11.6 75.0 32.1 21.1 83.8 13.9 50.0 22.9 12.3 69.8 17.6 25.0 11.7 5.7 55.0 19.1 IPLV 16.7 YLAA0048HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 48.9 47.0 95.0 10.9 75.0 39.7 30.7 83.7 12.7 50.0 28.3 17.7 69.7 16.1 25.0 14.7 7.6 55.0 19.2 IPLV 15.7 YLAA0058HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 57.0 57.7 95.0 10.6 75.0 46.2 36.6 83.7 12.8 50.0 32.4 20.9 69.1 16.0 25.0 16.6 8.8 55.0 19.0 IPLV 15.6 YLAA0065HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 62.3 65.2 95.0 10.4 80.0 54.3 46.8 87.3 12.2 60.0 42.5 28.9 75.9 14.3 40.0 30.0 17.7 63.9 17.1 20.0 13.8 7.3 55.0 18.5 IPLV 15.6 YLAA0082HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 77.9 84.1 95.0 10.3 83.6 67.8 64.9 88.3 11.7 66.7 58.3 43.9 79.9 14.3 50.3 46.6 30.2 70.9 16.5 33.3 31.8 16.9 59.5 20.8 16.7 16.8 8.6 55.0 21.8 IPLV 16.1 YLAA0092HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 85.7 83.6 95.0 11.0 83.3 74.9 64.0 87.4 12.4 66.7 62.7 46.3 78.9 14.2 50.0 48.7 30.9 69.1 16.3 33.3 33.2 17.7 58.3 18.9 16.7 16.3 8.1 55.0 19.4 IPLV 16.1 YLAA0101HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 98.3 106.1 95.0 10.1 86.1 89.3 82.8 89.5 11.5 57.0 65.6 43.7 75.1 14.6 43.0 50.3 30.5 65.7 17.0 13.9 16.0 8.5 55.0 19.0 IPLV 15.7 YLAA0125HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 116.0 112.0 95.0 10.3 75.0 94.6 76.8 83.9 12.6 50.0 67.2 43.5 69.7 16.0 25.0 34.9 18.3 55.0 19.3 IPLV 15.7 Part Load Ratings (Cont'd) FORM 150.72-EG6 (1221) JOHNSON CONTROLS 27 HIGH EFFICIENCY Part Load Ratings (Cont'd) YLAA0139HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 126.1 136.1 95.0 10.1 83.3 110.4 90.1 87.5 12.1 66.7 85.6 71.1 75.8 15.5 50.0 63.2 39.6 65.1 19.1 33.3 36.2 27.1 55.5 20.8 IPLV 15.9 YLAA0156HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 144.5 153.0 95.0 10.2 80.0 124.8 108.4 86.8 12.0 60.0 97.8 72.4 75.6 14.2 40.0 70.4 39.9 64.2 16.9 20.0 34.6 18.5 55.0 19.0 IPLV 15.5 YLAA0175HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 172.5 194.2 95.0 9.8 83.3 152.6 143.5 88.1 11.4 66.7 130.8 99.2 80.5 13.5 50.0 102.7 64.2 70.7 15.2 33.3 69.2 38.6 59.1 18.3 16.7 34.1 18.3 55.0 18.9 IPLV 15.6 YLAA0200HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 194.5 210.9 95.0 10.1 88.9 172.9 156.5 88.4 11.8 76.7 149.2 108.7 81.0 13.9 60.6 117.9 71.6 71.4 16.0 42.9 83.3 41.1 60.7 18.3 20.4 39.6 20.9 55.0 19.6 IPLV 16.1 YLAA0230HE % DISPL.TONS COMPR. KW AMBIENT (°F)UNIT EER 100.0 220.6 240.0 95.0 10.2 88.9 196.2 190.5 88.4 11.2 76.7 169.2 134.9 81.0 13.1 60.6 133.7 91.0 71.4 14.9 42.8 94.4 53.9 60.7 16.8 20.2 44.6 27.4 55.0 17.4 IPLV 15.6 engineering guide FW and FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical 2 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Features and Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Construction Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Standard and Optional Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Coil Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Physical Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Electric Heat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Fan Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 Motor and Fan Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Sound Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Dimensional Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 Guide Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES: • Johnson Controls offers Web-Select®, the industry’s first web-based rating and selection program for com plete unit, coil and sound selection . See your representative for more information . • Some drawings are not shown in this catalog . • All data herein is subject to change without notice . • Drawings not for installation purposes . • ETL Report Number 3096645CRT-002 . JOHNSON CONTROLS 3 FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FEATURES AND BENEFITS DESIGN FLEXIBILITY The Johnson Controls vertical floor mounted fan coil units are designed to maximize flexibility of selection and installation . The units are also designed to exceed the stringent quality standards of the institutional market, while remaining cost competitive in the light commercial seg- ment of the market . Johnson Controls vertical fan coil units set the new standards for quality, flexibility, and competitive pricing . DESIGN FLEXIBILITY The extensive variety of standard options available on vertical floor fan coil units are where you find the ver- satility to fit any HVAC system designer’s needs . Models FWX and FWI allow for additional height and width dimensions to meet architectural demand . Options include: single wall stainless steel drain pan; MERV 7, MERV 8 and MERV 13 filters; and electric heat with single point power connection . All electric heat units are listed with ETL as an assembly and carry the cETL label . All units comply with the latest edition of AHRI Standard 440 for testing and rating fan coil units, are certified, and display the AHRI symbol . High efficiency motors, fan relays, disconnects and fusing mean easier coordination between mechanical and electrical trades . Coil options allow for three or four row chilled water or DX cooling coils, and one or two row hot water or steam heating coils . Silent solid state relays are available for fan and electric heat control in sound sensitive environments . CONVENIENT INSTALLATION All vertical floor fan coils are shipped completely assembled, reducing field installation time and labor . All units are thoroughly inspected and tested prior to shipment, eliminating potential problems at startup . Motor wiring is brought to a junction box on the inside of the unit end pocket, reducing electrical hook-up time . Factory furnished valve packages assure proper fit, operation and performance . For fast track jobs, the vertical floor fan coil is available on Quick Ship with 5, 10 or 15 day lead times . OPTIMUM BUILDING PERFORMANCE Concealed vertical floor fan coil chassis are built from galvanized steel . Exposed cabinet models are powder coated galvannealed steel . All units, with or without electric heat, are cETL listed and labeled . All wiring is in compliance with NEC, assuring safety and quality for the owner . Floor mounted cabinet models feature finned tubular heating elements in the reheat position, protecting room occupants from electrical shock . Vertical floor fan coil units have a removable fan/drain pan assembly . The entire fan assembly can be easily removed from the unit and serviced on a workbench . Filters are easily replaceable from the return air toe space without the need for tools or removal of the front panel (FW only) . 4 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical CONSTRUCTION FEATURES MODEL FWX & FLX (Photo as shown for FWX) . FW and FL Series fan coils have many standard and optional features which are unique to the industry . See page 6 for a complete listing . MODEL FWI Vertical Inclined Top MODEL FWC Vertical Concealed All units are cETL and AHRI 440 listed and labeled Single wall galvanized insulated drain pans are double sloped to drain connections Fan/drain pan assembly can be easily removed for cleaning and servicing Chilled water or DX cooling coils up to 4 rows Hot water and steam heating coils up to 2 rows are located in the reheat position Open toe space or decorative return air grille (FW) Return air louver (FL) Optional finned tubular elec- tric resistance heat (not shown) to prevent electrical shock . ETL listed as an assembly for safety compliance . Entire electric heat assembly can be removed for servicing Baked anodic acrylic powder paint (exposed cabinet models) Standard insulation: Closed cell foam (FW), 1/2" thick fiberglass (FL) Optional insulation: Closed cell foam (FL) Foil faced insulation (FL) Integral filter rack with 1" throwaway filter on all units Single point power connection on all units with and without electric heat Electric heat element installed to avoid drips from coil condensate Control access door provided with unit mounted t-stat Stamped louver or linear bar discharge grilles Double wall plastic auxiliary drain pan, standard or extended length (extended FW only) MODEL FLC Low-Profile Concealed Permanently lubricated, three tap, PSC fan motors designed for quiet and efficient operation Optional electronically commutated (brushless DC) motor JOHNSON CONTROLS 5 FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) CONSTRUCTION FEATURES MODELS FWX/FWI/FWC END POCKETS The 8" end pockets allow for accessibility and service of optional factory piping packages and controls . End panels are removable to allow for even greater access . FAN DECK The fan/drain pan assembly is easily removable for service access to motors and blowers at, or away from, the unit . DRAIN PAN The sloped insulated primary drain pan is available in stainless steel construction . Standard drain pan is externally insulated, single wall galvanized steel . The FW Series fan/drain pan assembly is easily removable for cleaning . COILS All fan coils are available in 2 or 4 pipe configurations . The heating coil is standard in the reheat position . Heating and cooling coils are available with the same or opposite end connections . Access for cleaning on the entering air side is available when the drain pan is removed . Coils are removable for service . FILTER The filter is easily replaceable through the return air toe space without requiring removal of the front panel . POWDER COATED PAINTED SURFACE Exposed cabinet Models FWX and FWI, as well as supply and return air grilles and the FWC wall recessing panel, feature a powder coat finish that resists scuffing, scratching, fading, and finger- prints . 6 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical CONSTRUCTION FEATURES CONTROL ENCLOSURE The FW control enclosure provides adequate space for the unit controller and fan coil relay . The fan coil relay is designed to limit diagnostic problems, while allowing for multi-voltage fan power input . The board is designed for factory installed, color coded, plug and play con- nections designed to ensure accurate wiring . FAN DECK REMOVAL FW units allow for a single technician to service the fan/motor by keeping the fan deck to less than 44" . Motors are supplied with quick connectors to allow electrical service without the need for tools . PIPING PACKAGES Factory installed piping packages come equipped with components specific to the project . Actuators ship with color coded plug and play connections for quick, accu- rate installations . LID REMOVAL Top panel is removable from fan coil without the need to disconnect piping or electrical wires . MODELS FWX/FWI/FWC JOHNSON CONTROLS 7 FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) MODELS FLX/FLC END POCKETS The 8" end pockets allow for accessibility and service of optional factory piping packages and controls . End panels are removable to allow for even greater access . FAN DECK The fan/drain pan assembly is easily removable for service access to motors and blowers at, or away from, the unit . DRAIN PAN The sloped insulated primary drain pan is available in stainless steel construction . The standard drain pan is externally insulated, single wall galvanized steel . A non-metallic auxiliary drip pan is provided as standard . The FL Series fan/drain pan assembly is easily removable for cleaning . COILS All units are available in 2 or 4 pipe configurations. The heating coil is standard in the reheat position . Heating and cooling coils are available with same end connections . Access for cleaning on the entering air side is available when the drain pan is removed . Coils are removable for service . FILTER The filter is easily replaceable through the return air toe space without requiring removal of the front panel . POWDER COATED PAINTED SURFACE Exposed cabinet Model FLX, as well as supply and return air grilles and the FLC wall recessing panel, feature a powder coat finish that resists scuffing, scratching, fading, and fingerprints. CONSTRUCTION FEATURES 8 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical CONSTRUCTION FEATURES MODELS FLX/FLC CONCEALED MODEL FLC For built-in applications, Model FLC features a 1" top supply with duct collar . ELECTRIC HEAT A variety of kW and voltage configurations are available . Options include door interlock disconnects, low voltage controls, and silent solid state relays . All control and electric heat configurations include single point power connection and are cETL listed as an assembly . ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURE The front access electrical enclosure provides access to all electric heat and control components . Terminal strips are furnished for simple power and control wiring connections . Multiple knockouts allow wiring entries from either the top or bottom of the compartment . JOHNSON CONTROLS 9 FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) STANDARD AND OPTIONAL FEATURES STANDARD FEATURES Construction All Units • AHRI 440 certified and labeled • Galvanized steel construction • Insulation, FW: elastomeric closed cell foam • Insulation, FL: 1/2" thick fiberglass insulation • Integral filter rack with 1" throwaway filter Concealed Units • Top supply with duct collar Exposed Units • Top stamped louver supply grille • Durable powder coat paint • End pockets with removable panels • 20 gauge exterior panel construction • Flat top • Inclined top (FWI only) Coils • Cooling - 3 or 4 row chilled water or DX, heat pump compatible • Heating - 1 or 2 row hot water or steam – reheat position • 3/8" O .D . seamless copper tubes (FW) • 0 .012" tube wall thickness (FW) • 1/2" O .D . seamless copper tubes (FL) • 0 .016" tube wall thickness (FL) • High efficiency aluminum fin surface for optimizing heat- transfer, pressure drop and carryover • Left or right hand, same or opposite (FW only) end connections • Removable for service • Manual air vents Drain Pans • Single wall, galvanized steel, externally insulated – fire retardant and antimicrobial • Double sloped to drain connection • 3/4" M .P .T . auxiliary drain pan connection • Double wall plastic auxiliary drip pan Fan Assemblies • Forward curved, DWDI centrifugal type • 115V, 277V, single phase, 3-speed PSC motors • Easily removable for service Electrical • cETL listed for safety compliance • Electrical junction box for field wiring terminations • Terminal block for field connections Electric Heat • Finned tubular element on all floor mounted units pro- tects against electrical shock • ETL listed as an assembly for safety compliance • Integral electric heat assembly with removable elements for easy service • Automatic reset primary and back-up secondary thermal limits • Single point power connection OPTIONAL FEATURES Construction All Units • Foil faced fiberglass insulation (FL) • Elastomeric closed cell foam insulation (FL) • Manual and motorized outside air dampers • Spare 1" throwaway filters • 1" pleated filters (MERV 7) • Wall boxes (FW only) • Leveling legs Concealed Units • Wall recessing panels (FW only) Exposed Units • Linear bar discharge grille, powder coated • 16 gauge front panel (FW only) • Return air louver grille • 2" - 8" falsebacks (FW only) • Extended end pockets (FW only) • Tamper proof fasteners Coils • Automatic air vents • Stainless steel coil casings • 1/2" O .D . seamless copper tubes • 0 .016" tube wall thickness • 0 .025" tube wall (standard on steam) Drain Pans • Stainless steel construction with external insulation • Double wall plastic auxiliary drain pan -- extended length (FW only) • Stainless steel auxiliary drain pan -- extended length (FW only) Fan Assemblies • 115V, 208-230V, 277V, single phase, 3-speed fixed, 3-speed adjustable, or 2-10VDC proportional ECM motors (VF only) Electrical • SCR fan speed controller (high speed only) • Electronically Commutated Motors • Fan relay packages • Silent solid state fan relays (FW only) • Toggle disconnect switch • Condensate overflow switch (auxiliary drain pan) • Main fusing • Unit and remote mounted three speed fan switches 10 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Electrical (continued) • Unit and remote mounted 3-speed fan switches (unit mounted three speed switch is located under access door on exposed and inclined top vertical floor mount units . Unit mounted 3-speed switch is located within control enclosure on vertical low profile units) Electric Heat • Door interlocking disconnect switches • Main fusing • Silent relay/contactors (FW only) Piping Packages • Factory assembled • Shipped loose for field installation • Factory mounted option available • 1/2" and 3/4", 2-way and 3-way normally closed, two position electric motorized valves • Isolation ball valves with memory stop • 4 pipe with 3-way valve (FW only) • Fixed and adjustable flow control devices • Unions and P/T ports • Modulating control valves • High pressure close-off actuators (1/2" = 50 PSIG; 3/4" = 25 PSIG) Thermostats • Digital display - programmable or non-programmable • Unit and remote mounted, with integral 3-speed fan switch • 2-pipe and 4-pipe control sequences • Automatic and manual changeover JOHNSON CONTROLS 11 FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) COIL DATA: FW SERIES COILS Johnson Controls offers hot water, chilled water, direct expansion (DX - FW only), and standard single tube steam coils for specific application with all Vertical Floor fan coil units . Strict on-site inspection before, during, and after installation guarantees the highest quality and performance available . STANDARD FEATURES • Cooling - 3 or 4 row chilled water or DX (FW only) • Heating - 1 or 2 row hot water or steam • Total rows of cooling and heating coils: FW: 4 maximum, FL: 5 maximum • 3/8" O .D . seamless copper tubes • 0 .012" tube wall thickness • High efficiency aluminum fin surface for optimizing heat transfer, pressure drop and carryover • Left or right hand, same, or opposite side (FW only) connections • Manual air vents OPTIONAL FEATURES • Automatic air vents • Stainless steel coil casings • 1/2" O .D . seamless copper tubes • 0 .016" tube wall thickness • 0 .025" tube wall thickness (standard on steam coils) • DX coils (FW only) are heat pump compatible NOTES: 1 . Connection sizes are for standard circuit coils . Consult factory for special applications . 2 . See submittal drawings for connection locations . 3 . All dimensional data is outside diameter (O .D .), measured in inches [millimeters] . UNIT SIZE COIL FACE AREA DISCHARGE GRILLE FREE AREA FILTER FACE AREA NOMINAL FILTER SIZES 02 0.97 [.090]0.47 [.044]1.40 [.130]9.25 X 21.75 X 1 [235 X 552 X 25.4] 03 1.25 [.116]0.56 [.052]1.65 [.154]9.25 X 25.75 X 1 [235 X 654 X 25.4] 04 1.67 [.155]0.66 [.061]2.04 [.189]9.25 X 31.75 X 1 [235 X 806 X 25.4] 06 2.36 [.219]0.94 [.087]2.68 [.249]9.25 X 41.75 X 1 [235 X 1060 X 25.4] 08 2.50 [.023]0.94 [.087]2.79 [.260](2) 9.25 X 21.75 X 1 [235 X 552 X 25.4] 10 3.47 [.322]1.31 [.122]3.69 [.343](1) 9.25 X 25.75 X 1 [235 X 654 X 25.4] (1) 9.25 X 31.75 X 1 [235 X 806 X 25.4] 12 4.03 [.374]1.50 [.139]4.19 [.389](3) 9.25 X 21.75 X 1 [235 X 552 X 25.4] NOTES: 1 . Face and free areas are in square feet [square meters] . 2 . Filter sizes are in inches [millimeters] . NOTE: Based on 70°F DB EAT, 180°F EWT, 40°F temperature drop, high fan speed . Johnson Controls offers Web-Select® fan coil rating and selection program for complete unit, coil and sound selec- tion .See your representative for more information . QS (MBH)GPM WPD QS (MBH)GPM WPD FW 02 230 7.86 0.4 0.2 14.27 0.7 1.0 FW 03 300 10.98 0.6 0.4 19.15 1.0 1.9 FW 04 430 15.95 0.8 0.8 27.48 1.4 4.2 FW 06 540 21.79 1.1 1.7 36.75 1.9 8.8 FW 08 600 23.85 1.2 2.1 40.07 2.1 10.7 FW 10 830 34.28 1.8 5.1 54.72 2.8 3.4 FW 12 920 38.81 2.0 7.0 62.21 3.2 4.7 UNIT TYPE NOM. CFM 1 ROW 2 ROWUNIT SIZE FW HEATING CAPACITY Liquid Suction Liquid Suction Liquid Suction 02 - 12 5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [22]5/8 [22]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]3/8 [10]5/8 [16]3/8 [10]5/8 [16]3/8 [10]5/8 [16] COIL TYPE UNIT SIZE HOT WATER CHILLED WATER STEAM 1 ROW 2 ROW 3 ROW 2 ROW 3 ROW4 ROW 1 ROW 2 ROW REFRIGERANT (DX) 4 ROW FW NOMINAL COIL CONNECTION SIZES FW FACE AREA, FREE AREA AND FILTER SIZES 12 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical COIL DATA: FL SERIES 02 & 03 5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16] 04 & 06 5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]5/8 [16]7/8 [19] UNIT SIZE 1 ROW 3 ROW 3 ROW COIL CONNECTION SIZE 2 ROW 2 ROW HOT WATER CHILLED WATER 4 ROW NOTES: 1 . Connection sizes are for standard circuit coils . Consult factory for special applications . 2 . See submittal drawings for connection locations . 3 . All dimensional data is outside diameter (O .D .), measured in inches [millimeters] . UNIT SIZE COIL FACE AREA DISCHARGE GRILLE DIMENSIONS FILTER FACE AREA NOMINAL FILTER SIZES 02 1.18 [0.11] 17 x 5.25 [432 x 133]1.12 [0.10]21.5 x 7.5 [546 x 191] 03 1.53 [0.14] 22 x 5.25 [559 x 133]1.38 [0.13]26.5 x 7.5 [673 x 191] 04 2.08 [0.19] 30 x 5.25 [762 x 133]1.80 [0.17]34.5 x 7.5 [876 x 191] 06 3.06 [0.28] 44 x 5.25 [1118 x 133]2.53 [0.23]48.5 x 7.5 [1232 x 191] NOTES: 1 . Face and free areas are in square feet [square meters] . 2 . Filter sizes are in inches [millimeters] . QS (MBH)GPM WPD QS (MBH)GPM WPD QS (MBH)GPM WPD 02 200 9.2 0.6 0.6 15.4 1.1 2.6 19.0 1.3 5.7 03 300 13.4 0.9 1.2 22.4 1.5 5.6 27.2 1.9 2.0 04 400 18.5 1.3 2.4 30.4 2.1 11.1 37.0 2.5 3.9 06 600 28.2 1.9 6.0 44.8 3.1 4.7 56.0 3.8 9.8 3 ROW FLC FLX UNIT TYPE UNIT SIZE NOM. CFM 1 ROW 2 ROW Note: Based on 70°F DB EAT, 180°F EWT, 30°F temperature drop, high fan speed . FL NOMINAL COIL CONNECTION SIZES FL FACE AREA AND FILTER SIZES FL HEATING CAPACITY JOHNSON CONTROLS 13 FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) PHYSICAL DATA: FW SERIES FW AHRI STANDARD RATINGS FW UNIT WEIGHT DATA 02 03 04 06 08 10 12 36 [16]45 [20]55 [25]62 [28]66 [30]92 [42]105 [48] 66 [30]74 [34]87 [39]96 [44]102 [46]131 [59]149 [68] 68 [31]76 [34]89 [40]99 [45]102 [46]135 [61]153 [69] 1 ROW - DRY 9 [4]10 [5]12 [5]14 [6]15 [7]18 [8]21 [9] 1 ROW - WET 12 [5]13 [6]17 [7]19 [9]20 [9]25 [11]29 [13] 2 ROW - DRY 12 [5]13 [6]16 [7]17 [8]19 [9]24 [11]26 [12] 2 ROW - WET 16 [7]17 [8]21 [9]25 [11]26 [12]32 [15]37 [17] 3 ROW - DRY 15 [7]17 [8]19 [9]23 [10]24 [11]29 [13]34 [15] 3 ROW - WET 19 [9]21 [10]26 [12]31 [14]33 [15]41 [18]48 [22] 4 ROW - DRY 18 [8]21 [10]25 [11]29 [13]31 [14]37 [17]43 [19] 4 ROW - WET 25 [11]27 [12]34 [15]40 [18]42 [19]51 [23]61 [28] NOTE: Unit weight data is shipping weight in pounds [kilograms]. TOTAL COIL ROWS COMPONENT UNIT SIZE FWC BASE UNIT FWX BASE UNIT FWI BASE UNIT 02 3 12 231 5700 4400 1.3 2.6 38 03 3 12 311 8500 6300 1.9 5.85 46 04 3 12 425 10500 8100 2.4 3.04 51 06 3 12 602 14900 11400 3.3 2.88 77 08 3 12 796 19800 14900 4.5 5.62 181 10 3 12 983 27600 20100 6.3 7.42 170 12 3 12 1192 28100 21700 6.4 2.88 298 02 4 12 210 7800 5500 1.8 6.16 41 03 4 12 281 9100 6800 2.1 2.72 56 04 4 12 375 12200 9100 2.8 2.3 63 06 4 12 546 21400 14700 4.9 8.58 87 08 4 12 722 27400 19000 6.2 14.33 200 10 4 12 901 35300 24300 7.9 15.57 192 12 4 12 1098 35100 26200 7.9 2.16 330 Vertical Concealed Rows FPI QS (BTUH)QT (BTUH)Flowrate (GPM)WPD (ft-wg) Water Power Input (Watts)Size Coil Airflow CFM (Dry Flow) Cooling Capacity 02 3 12 221 5500 4300 1.3 2.44 45 03 3 12 301 8300 6200 1.9 5.63 44 04 3 12 423 10600 8100 2.4 3.05 49 06 3 12 599 14900 11400 3.3 2.88 77 08 3 12 823 20400 15400 4.7 6.04 197 10 3 12 981 27700 20100 6.3 7.42 180 12 3 12 1178 28200 21700 6.4 2.88 212 02 4 12 200 7500 5300 1.7 5.91 62 03 4 12 269 8700 6500 1.9 2.4 47 04 4 12 379 12300 9100 2.8 2.3 54 06 4 12 546 21300 14700 4.8 8.3 84 08 4 12 748 28200 19600 6.4 15.19 218 10 4 12 893 35300 24200 7.9 15.57 197 12 4 12 1077 35000 25900 7.9 2.17 225 Vertical Exposed/Sloped Top Rows FPI QT (BTUH)QS (BTUH)Flowrate (GPM)WPD (ft-wg)Size Coil Airflow CFM (Dry Flow) Cooling Capacity Water Power Input (Watts) 14 JOHNSON CONTROLS Catalog: 115.26-EG9 (1121) FW & FL Fan-Coil Units Floor-Mounted, Vertical PHYSICAL DATA: FL SERIES FL UNIT WEIGHT DATA FL AHRI STANDARD RATINGS Rows FPI QT (BTUH) QS (BTUH) Flow Rate (GPM) WPD (ft-wg) FLC-02 3 10 200 6500 4300 1.6 11.7 75 FLC-03 3 10 300 9500 6500 2 3.4 75 FLC-04 3 10 400 14000 9500 2.9 7.4 75 FLC-06 3 10 600 20000 15000 5.2 9.9 140 FLX-02 3 10 200 6500 4300 1.6 11.7 75 FLX-03 3 10 300 9500 6500 2 3.4 75 FLX-04 3 10 400 14000 9500 2.9 7.4 75 FLX-06 3 10 600 20000 15000 5.2 9.9 140 Power Input (Watts) Model / Size Coil Airflow CFM (Dry flow) Cooling Capacity Water 51 [23]58 [26]65 [29]77 [35] 65 [29]69 [31]74 [34]84 [38] 90 [41]97 [44]104 [47]116 [53] 104 [47]108 [49]113 [51]123 [56] 1 ROW - DRY 11 [5]13 [6]15 [7]17 [8] 1 ROW - WET 14 [6]17 [8]20 [9]23 [10] 2 ROW - DRY 14 [6]17 [8]20 [9]22 [10] 2 ROW - WET 20 [9]25 [11]30 [13]34 [15] 3 ROW - DRY 19 [8]22 [10]25 [11]29 [13] 3 ROW - WET 28 [13]34 [15]40 [18]47 [21] 4 ROW - DRY 24 [11]29 [13]33 [15]37 [17] 4 ROW - WET 36 [16]45 [20]53 [24]61 [28] 5 ROW - DRY 31 [14]37 [17]43 [19]49 [22] 5 ROW - WET 46 [21]57 [26]68 [31]79 [36] NOTE: Unit weight data is shipping weight in pounds [kilograms]. COMPONENT UNIT SIZE 02 03 04 06 FLC BASE UNIT, STD HEIGHT FLC BASE UNIT, EXT HEIGHT FLX BASE UNIT, STD HEIGHT FLX BASE UNIT, EXT HEIGHT TOTAL COIL ROWS OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURS motivaircorp.comTM MHP Air Source Heat Pump 2-Pipe & 4-Pipe Technology 15 - 240 Tons / 15-120 Tons OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURS motivaircorp.comTM The evolution of HVAC building design guidelines demand more effective and efficient means for heating and cooling commercial spaces. Motivair has taken on the social responsibility to drive market leading efficiencies with its development of air source heat pumps. The MHP delivers heating or cooling with a robust industrial design. The chiller’s large capacity range (15-240 tons) allows for optimum efficiency, scalability and load management in a compact footprint. Business and critical environments require chiller systems to provide a reliable source of hot or cold water, which can improve overall system uptime and reduce the total cost of ownership. Every heating and cooling application is unique, which is why Motivair’s Heat Pumps have been designed to accommodate a wide range of operating points and customization based specifically on the needs of the customer. No other chiller offers such a broad range of features and benefits that can be used in combination to create a chiller best suited for your business’s needs. As an industry leader, we aim to deliver innovative products, reliable solutions and an unwavering commitment to excellence. Advancing HVAC design OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURSTM The Motivair MHP Air to Water Heat Pump chillers have been designed for clients looking for a simple and reliable product to both heat and cool their building. Ideal for 2-pipe systems, the MHP range spans from 15-240 tons and can be offered with a wide range of options. The capacity of the MHP 4-Pipe series ranges from15-120 tons. These units can control to hot and cold water setpoints independently or simultaneously depending on the system demand. Implement this unique multifunction technology into your specific application to increase system efficiency and reliability while decreasing the projects carbon footprint. Today’s state of the art controls allows for optimized heat pump efficiencies while giving the owner full local or remote control and monitoring of the system. Use of electronic expansion valves and EC fans increase efficiency and optimize capacity control. With the ability to stage compressors on and off to meet any heating or cooling load, the MHP range can adapt to any building load profile. A complete list of standard and custom options allows a design engineer or owner to tailor each chiller to the building’s specific needs. Motivair Heat Pumps are often applied to commercial office spaces, institutional facilities, multi-purpose buildings and multi-unit residential buildings that have both heating and cooling requirements.The MHP range is best applied in geographical areas with more temperate climates such as the Pacific Northwest and Southern US. DYNAMIC HEAT PUMP TECHNOLOGY FEATURES •Complete charge of R-410A environmentally friendly refrigerant. •High efficiency Scroll compressors. •Brazed plate or shell & Tube evaporators •Low noise EC Condenser fan speed control •Fan assemblies with TEAO motors, sickle cut composite fan blades and high strength safety guards. •Powerful, easy to use, non- proprietary PLC •Electronic expansion valve •Integrated flow switch •Easily adjustable control set points •Intelligent defrost cycle •Reliable heating down to 14°F •Baked powder epoxy coat paint finish for long lasting attractive look. •Standard weather-proof enclosure •Simple service can be performed by any qualified refrigeration technician •Removable access panels for easy service and maintenance OPTIONS •Integrated single or redundant circulation pumps •Low Noise Package •Condenser coil coatings for corrosive environments •Condenser coil hail/filter protection •Remote control panel •Communication cards for connection to customer building management system •Cloud based cellular remote monitoring motivaircorp.com OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURSTM INTELLIGENT CHILLER RESPONSE The Latest generation of Motivair® software allows the chillers to respond to system changes in real time and to adjust performance accordingly. The proprietary control logic in Motivair chillers provides: n Automatic restart after a power outage n Defrost cycle activated via temperature & pressure monitoring n Heated copper tubes reduce buildup of frost n Rapid restart of refrigeration compressors after a power outage, while affording maximum compressor protection n Selective decision on which compressor(s) to start first based on run-time and fastest possible response to system load n Liquid injection to the compressors under high ambient operation CENTURION MONITORING SYSTEM This optional feature empowers the owner by providing a wide range of safeties and access to critical data from a remote location via cellular service, outside of the customer’s firewall. If the chiller is operating in an unsafe condition or in the unlikely event of an alarm, designated contacts are immediately notified by the chiller of its condition. The pending alarm can then be avoided or quickly corrected. FEATURES: n Data trending n Password protected multi-level access n Adjustable warning thresholds Advanced PLC controls motivaircorp.com OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURSTM Application Defined Features & Options The MHP chillers feature Scroll compressors with R410A and are available from 15-250 tons. Options for 1,2 or 4 independent refrigerant circuits come with up to 8 compressors, providing unloading for virtually unlimited capacity control. Redundant circuited chillers allow for one circuit to be serviced while the second circuit remains fully operational. Motor over-temperature and current protection provide extended compressor life. The EC TEAO motors feature a reversed stator and rotor, eliminating the traditional motor shaft. The fans are suitable for outdoor use and provide variable speed operation. The industrial design includes composite blades, which do not flex or lose efficiency at the top of their performance curve and allow for reliable low ambient head pressure control. The MHP chillers feature either an ASME U and CRN stamped, dual circuited shell & tube evaporator or a brazed plate evaporator. The shell & tube vessel uses a direct expansion design complete with a carbon steel shell and heavy gauge copper tubes while the brazed plate option uses stainless steel plates with copper braze. Both options insure long life cycles and highly efficient heat transfer under varying loads. COMPRESSORS CONDENSER FANS EVAPORATORS ADDITIONAL OPTIONS Standard EC fan speed control permits reliable chilled water operation in -20°F (glycol required). Integrated single or double pump options with single point power provide loop circulation within the chiller footprint. Low noise options provide year-round quite operation. Hail guards and condenser filters prevent coil damage and clogging. motivaircorp.com OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURSTM MHP Specifications Does not include optional pump(s) ** Optional Pumps & Tank may effect dimensions *** Does not include Optional pump(s) or tank (1) Series heat recovery configuration. Pumps and tank not available on MHR-W © 2020 Motivair Corporation. Motivair reserves the right to modify specifications without notice. Reproduction of this brochure in whole or in part is prohibited. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS: MHP Air-Cooled Heat Pumps with SCROLL compressors (15-50 tons) MHP 1200 1500 2200 3000 3500 4000 5000 6000 7200 NOMINAL COOLING CAPACITY EWT 54°F LWT 44°F AMB 95° BTU/h 173,436 194,000 221,000 245,000 296,000 344,000 385,000 453,000 522,000 Nominal Power Cooling Mode kW 19 24 25 30 34 40 46 57 65 NOMINAL HEATING CAPACITY EWT 104°F LWT 114°F AMB 45°F BTU/H 187,000 211,000 245,000 271,000 330,000 375,000 429,000 513,000 595,000 Nominal Power Heating Mode kW 20 24 26 30 33.25 40 75 55 63 REFRIGERATING CIRCUIT Qty.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 SCROLL COMPRESSOR Qty.2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 CAPACITY STEPS Qty.2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 FANS / CONDENSER FANS / CONDENSER CFM 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 MHP FANS Qty.2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 OPTIONAL PUMP & TANK NOMINAL FLOW GPM 34 39 45 50 60 69 77 91 104 NOMINAL EVAPORATOR PRESSURE DROP PSI 5 6 5 7 5 6 9 8 7 NOMINAL PUMP PRESSURE PSI 15 13 13 11 16 13 12 12 15 NOMINAL PUMP ABSORBED POWER HP 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 2 OPTIONAL PUMP ABSORBED CURRENT A 3 3 3 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 5 7 VICTAULIC CHILLED WATER CONNECTIONS IN 1.5”1.5”1.5”1.5”1.5”2.5”2.5”2.5”2.5” OPTIONAL TANK VOLUME gallons 50 50 50 50 50 75 75 125 125 MHP SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL**dbA 69 69 70 70 70 73 74 74 74 MHP LOW NOISE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL** dbA 66 66 67 67 67 71 71 71 73 DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS MHP Length IN 100.5 100.5 100.5 100.5 100.5 100.5 100.5 140 140 MHP Width IN 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 MHP Height IN 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 MHP Weight - Installed*LBS 1,387 1,474 1,518 1,760 1,958 2,068 2,310 2,530 3,058 MHP Air-Cooled Heat Pumps with SCROLL compressors (60-240 tons)MHP 200 240 270 390 430 470 510 600 660 700 820 930 NOMINAL COOLING CAPACITY EWT 54°F LWT 44°F AMB 95°F BTU/h 696,000 825,000 911,000 1,328,124 1,395,000 1,560,000 1,729,000 2,000,000 2,258,000 2,415,000 2,627,000 2,869,000 Nominal Power Cooling Mode kW 78 98 104.5 145 160 175 215 230 272 277 320 367 NOMINAL HEATING CAPACITY EWT 104°F LWT 114°F AMB 45°F BTU/h 750,000 931,000 1,023,000 1,355,000 1,560,000 1,770,000 1,980,000 2,240,000 2,531,000 2,808,000 3,104,000 3,412,000 Nominal Power Heating Mode kW 88 107 114 153 198 216 231 269 348 273 312 350 REFRIGERATING CIRCUIT Qty.2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 SCROLL COMPRESSOR Qty.4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 8 8 8 CAPACITY STEPS Qty.4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 8 8 8 FANS / CONDENSER MHP TOTAL CONDENSER AIR FLOW CFM 45,961 61,000 61,000 61,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 120,000 120,000 130,000 130,000 140,000 MHP FANS Qty.4 6 6 6 8 8 8 10 10 12 12 14 OPTIONAL PUMP SYSTEM NOMINAL FLOW GPM 137 168 185 238 280 310 335 396 457.9 483 524 572 NOMINAL EVAPORATOR PRESSURE DROP PSI 7 6 6 8 8 9 10 9 10 11 13 15 NOMINAL PUMP PRESSURE PSI 19 15 14 18 17 15 20 17 17 18 16 14 NOMINAL PUMP ABSORBED POWER HP 4 4 4 7.5 7.5 7.5 10 10 10 15 15 15 OPTIONAL PUMP ABSORBED CURRENT A 6.5 6.5 6.5 13 13 13 18 18 18 25 25 25 VICTAULIC CHILLED WATER CONNECTIONS***IN 3”3”3”3”3”3”3”3”6”6 6 6 MHP FULL LOAD AMPS (FLA)*A 133 171 174 220 279 336 354 457 525 576 645 722 NOISE DATA MHP SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL**dbA 76 76 79 79 81 83 80 82 84 86 89 91 MHP LOW NOISE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL**dbA 74 74 77 77 78 79 78 79 84 83 86 88 DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS MHP Length IN 110 158 158 158 197 197 240 284 284 376 376 376 motivaircorp.com OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURSTM MHP 4-Pipe Specifications (1) Cooling mode: EG20% water temperatures 54/44°F; Ambient temp. 95°F (2) Heating mode: EG20% water temperatures 105/115°F; Ambient temp. 45°F © 2020 Motivair Corporation. Motivair reserves the right to modify specifications without notice. Reproduction of this brochure in whole or in part is prohibited. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS: motivaircorp.com Unit Model (scroll compressors - R410A)Mod.62 92 132 152 192 222 312 442 482 Cooling Only mode (1) Cooling capacity Btu/hr 186,983 268,532 324,150 433,337 538,429 631,239 859,849 1,040,691 1,364,840 Cooling Capacity Tons 15.6 22.4 27.0 36.1 44.9 52.6 71.7 86.7 113.7 Power (compressors+ fans)kW 21.7 31.4 33.3 47.9 58.2 71.4 74.8 120.4 150.4 Heating Only mode (2) Heating capacity Btu/hr 211550 301971 371919 470870 590293 696068 921267 1156702 1480851 Power (compressors+ fans)kW 21.9 30.0 18.2 46.6 57.2 67.8 88.6 113.6 140.8 Simultaneous Cooling & Heating mode Cooling capacity Btu/hr 185,618 276,380 328,926 436,749 539,112 658,535 853,025 1,081,636 1,419,434 Cooling Capacity Tons 15.5 23.0 27.4 36.4 44.9 54.9 71.1 90.1 118.3 Heating capacity Btu/hr 244,306 365,095 429,925 566,409 706,305 866,673 1,119,169 1,412,609 1,852,770 Power (compressors)kW 16.8 25.2 28.7 37.2 47.8 58.8 75.4 94.8 123.2 Refrigerating Circuit Qty 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Scroll Compressor Qty 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 Capacity Steps Qty 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 EC Axial fans Qty 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 8 8 Electrical supply V/Ph/ Hz 460-3-60 Dimensions Length in 74 74 112 112 112 112 150 205 205 Width in 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Height in 85 85 84 84 84 84 85 85 85 OUR BUSINESS IS COOLING YOURS motivaircorp.comTM 5900 Genesee St. Lancaster, NY 14086 Tel: +1 716-691-9222 MFC Closed loop dry-coolers for process cooling and remote “Free-Cooling” applications. Chilled Door ® Rack Cooling System Advanced server rack cooling system fits and standard or OEM computer rack. Removes up to 75 kW of server heat per door. Learn more at www.chilleddoor.com CDU The Coolant Distribution Unit (CDU) provides 100% sensible cooling up to 1.25MW, depend- ing on the model. For use with the ChilledDoor® or other IT cooling systems. MLC-SC Air-Cooled Scroll Chillers 100 – 285 tons air-cooled with scroll compressors to accommodate a wide range of operating points and customization for today’s advanced industrial manufacturing and mission critical environments. Available Integrated Free-Cooling. MPC & MPC-FC 1/2-50 ton packaged air-cooled or water-cooled chillers for Industrial cooling, Medical cooling or custom HVAC applications. Includes integrated microprocessor, pump station, and storage reservoir. PTS Pump/Tank Stations for chillers and cooling systems. Standard and custom designs available. Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com APPENDIX C eQUEST Energy Modeling Results Project/Run: Brewster Stonybrook - Base Model 10-21-22 - Baseline Design Run Date/Time: 10/21/22 @ 17:26 eQUEST 3.65.7173 Monthly Energy Consumption by Enduse Page 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Electric Consumption (kWh) (x000) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Gas Consumption (Btu) (x000,000,000) Area Lighting Task Lighting Misc. Equipment Exterior Usage Pumps & Aux. Ventilation Fans Water Heating Ht Pump Supp. Space Heating Refrigeration Heat Rejection Space Cooling Electric Consumption (kWh x000) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool - - - - - - - - - - - - - Heat Reject.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Refrigeration - - - - - - - - - - - - - Space Heat - - - - - - - - - - - - - HP Supp.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Hot Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vent. Fans 0.98 1.07 1.03 1.00 1.19 0.79 0.38 0.43 1.19 1.13 1.13 1.19 11.50 Pumps & Aux.1.32 1.20 1.32 1.27 1.30 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.23 1.29 1.27 1.32 15.18 Ext. Usage - - - - - - - - - - - - - Misc. Equip.2.80 3.08 2.83 2.79 3.41 2.08 0.89 0.91 3.39 3.28 3.26 3.41 32.13 Task Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area Lights 5.68 5.66 6.11 5.78 6.26 5.40 4.29 4.72 6.22 6.03 5.99 6.26 68.42 Total 10.79 11.02 11.30 10.83 12.15 9.50 6.77 7.29 12.02 11.73 11.65 12.18 127.23 Gas Consumption (Btu x000,000,000) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool - - - - - - - - - - - - - Heat Reject.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Refrigeration - - - - - - - - - - - - - Space Heat 1.00 1.11 0.90 0.60 0.46 0.19 0.05 0.06 0.18 0.32 0.76 1.01 6.63 HP Supp.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Hot Water 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 Vent. Fans - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pumps & Aux.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Ext. Usage - - - - - - - - - - - - - Misc. Equip.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Task Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total 1.01 1.12 0.91 0.61 0.47 0.20 0.05 0.06 0.19 0.33 0.77 1.02 6.74 Project/Run: Brewster Stonybrook - High Eff Boilers Model with Chiller - 10-21-22 - Baseline Design Run Date/Time: 10/21/22 @ 18:53 eQUEST 3.65.7175 Monthly Energy Consumption by Enduse Page 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Electric Consumption (kWh) (x000) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Gas Consumption (Btu) (x000,000) Area Lighting Task Lighting Misc. Equipment Exterior Usage Pumps & Aux. Ventilation Fans Water Heating Ht Pump Supp. Space Heating Refrigeration Heat Rejection Space Cooling Electric Consumption (kWh x000) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.23 0.38 1.55 1.00 0.88 0.22 0.05 0.05 4.52 Heat Reject.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Refrigeration - - - - - - - - - - - - - Space Heat - - - - - - - - - - - - - HP Supp.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Hot Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vent. Fans 1.52 1.67 1.61 1.55 1.85 1.23 0.59 0.67 1.85 1.76 1.76 1.85 17.89 Pumps & Aux.1.33 1.21 1.31 1.23 1.22 1.10 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.18 1.25 1.32 14.47 Ext. Usage - - - - - - - - - - - - - Misc. Equip.2.69 2.95 2.72 2.68 3.27 2.01 0.88 0.91 3.24 3.14 3.12 3.27 30.89 Task Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area Lights 5.68 5.66 6.11 5.78 6.26 5.40 4.29 4.72 6.22 6.03 5.99 6.26 68.42 Total 11.26 11.54 11.80 11.29 12.82 10.13 8.42 8.42 13.29 12.33 12.16 12.74 136.19 Gas Consumption (Btu x000,000) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool - - - - - - - - - - - - - Heat Reject.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Refrigeration - - - - - - - - - - - - - Space Heat 561.6 649.6 482.9 299.2 212.5 68.5 8.9 11.1 54.9 134.7 391.7 538.2 3,413.9 HP Supp.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Hot Water 10.0 11.8 10.4 10.2 12.0 6.1 1.5 1.4 9.9 10.0 10.6 11.9 105.8 Vent. Fans - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pumps & Aux.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Ext. Usage - - - - - - - - - - - - - Misc. Equip.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Task Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total 571.7 661.4 493.3 309.4 224.6 74.6 10.4 12.5 64.9 144.6 402.2 550.1 3,519.6 Project/Run: Brewster Stonybrook - VRF Model - 10-23-22 - Baseline Design Run Date/Time: 10/23/22 @ 23:26 eQUEST 3.65.7173 Monthly Energy Consumption by Enduse Page 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Electric Consumption (kWh) (x000) Area Lighting Task Lighting Misc. Equipment Exterior Usage Pumps & Aux. Ventilation Fans Water Heating Ht Pump Supp. Space Heating Refrigeration Heat Rejection Space Cooling Electric Consumption (kWh x000) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool - - - - 0.08 0.19 1.06 0.61 0.40 0.05 - - 2.39 Heat Reject.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Refrigeration - - - - - - - - - - - - - Space Heat 46.58 48.53 39.65 22.53 14.93 4.29 0.50 0.57 3.51 9.31 30.33 43.02 263.76 HP Supp.14.90 43.43 11.87 1.20 0.32 - - - - 0.23 5.52 15.50 92.98 Hot Water 2.04 2.13 2.05 2.01 2.29 1.61 1.10 1.09 2.15 2.15 2.16 2.29 23.07 Vent. Fans 1.76 1.62 1.64 1.28 0.99 0.36 0.15 0.15 0.41 0.69 1.48 1.75 12.28 Pumps & Aux.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Ext. Usage - - - - - - - - - - - - - Misc. Equip.2.69 2.95 2.72 2.68 3.27 2.01 0.88 0.91 3.24 3.14 3.12 3.27 30.89 Task Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area Lights 5.68 5.66 6.11 5.78 6.26 5.40 4.29 4.72 6.22 6.03 5.99 6.26 68.42 Total 73.66 104.33 64.04 35.47 28.14 13.87 7.99 8.05 15.93 21.61 48.60 72.10 493.78 Gas Consumption (Btu) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool Heat Reject. Refrigeration Space Heat HP Supp. Hot Water Vent. Fans Pumps & Aux. Ext. Usage Misc. Equip. Task Lights Area Lights Total Project/Run: Brewster Stonybrook - Chiller-Heater Model - 10-23-22 - Baseline Design Run Date/Time: 10/23/22 @ 23:31 eQUEST 3.65.7173 Monthly Energy Consumption by Enduse Page 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Electric Consumption (kWh) (x000) Area Lighting Task Lighting Misc. Equipment Exterior Usage Pumps & Aux. Ventilation Fans Water Heating Ht Pump Supp. Space Heating Refrigeration Heat Rejection Space Cooling Electric Consumption (kWh x000) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool - - - 0.01 0.06 0.18 0.85 0.48 0.50 0.09 - - 2.16 Heat Reject.- - - 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.19 0.14 0.09 0.02 - - 0.51 Refrigeration - - - - - - - - - - - - - Space Heat 53.62 62.73 45.09 26.72 17.88 5.33 0.71 0.81 3.79 11.10 35.69 50.23 313.70 HP Supp.- - - - - - - - - - - - - Hot Water 2.03 2.11 2.04 2.00 2.28 1.61 1.10 1.09 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.28 22.99 Vent. Fans 2.47 2.82 2.07 1.23 0.83 0.27 0.13 0.08 0.22 0.51 1.64 2.29 14.55 Pumps & Aux.2.48 2.43 2.30 1.85 1.60 0.92 0.93 0.83 1.32 1.25 2.11 2.47 20.50 Ext. Usage - - - - - - - - - - - - - Misc. Equip.2.69 2.95 2.72 2.68 3.27 2.01 0.88 0.91 3.24 3.14 3.12 3.27 30.89 Task Lights - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area Lights 5.68 5.66 6.11 5.78 6.26 5.40 4.29 4.72 6.22 6.03 5.99 6.26 68.42 Total 68.97 78.71 60.33 40.26 32.20 15.76 9.09 9.07 17.52 24.30 50.70 66.80 473.72 Gas Consumption (Btu) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Space Cool Heat Reject. Refrigeration Space Heat HP Supp. Hot Water Vent. Fans Pumps & Aux. Ext. Usage Misc. Equip. Task Lights Area Lights Total Stony Brook School HVAC Feasibility Study TOWN OF BREWSTER westonandsampson.com APPENDIX D Floor Plans 41: a F�ns{nJa &et itram Pu,u Ww'• pew Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. an Air Quality Company P.O. Box 1385 508/247-9167 [800/931-1151] East Orleans, MA 02643 FAX: 508/255-0738 12 August, 2022 NES Job #980E Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2665 Dave Caolo Stony Brook Elementary School 384 Underpass Road Brewster, MA 02631 Re: Mold/moisture Inspection and sampling in 3 classrooms +SOW at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary (Brewster) Dear Mr. Caolo: Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. (NES) is pleased to submit this letter report on a mold/moisture inspection with sampling for three classrooms at 384 Underpass Road. Following ongoing authorization, NES sent Alexander MacLellan, CRMI back to the school on 8 August 2022. This report is CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary and can only be distributed by or with the approval of the Clients to whom it is addressed. BACKGROUND: NES was retained to carry out a sampling to document current mold/moisture conditions in classrooms, 039, 037 and 030. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: There was NO strong odors noted upon entering classrooms 039, 037 and 030. There was evidence of elevated humidity in ALL three classrooms at the time of this inspection. The hypothesis-based, PRV air sampling revealed that the Aspergillus/Penicillium-like spore readings in ALL three classrooms (039, 037 and 030) were ABOVE NES’s informal guideline for the general public, hence calling for further remediation. The need for further remediation in classrooms 039, 037 and 030 is described in the Scope of Work (SOW) below. ON SITE ACTIVITIES – Alex MacLellan arrived at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary on 8 August at about 9:45 am. Dave Caolo met Alex and directed him to the rooms of concern. During this inspection, Alex MacLellan used a calibrated Extech Hygro-Thermometer Pen (Model 445580) to measure temperature and relative humidity that is periodically calibrated to two known humidities. AIR SAMPLING - HYPOTHESIS TESTING Alex MacLellan with the guidance of Dr. Vaughan determined that an air sampling strategy was needed to address possible potential mold spore contamination in the three classrooms. The MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 2 sampling concern was to address the following hypothesis regarding possible environmental issues: Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classrooms, 039, 037 and 030, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. The airborne mold spore samples were taken in worst case (fan-disturbed) conditions in the classrooms. The disturbed samples were taken after blowing the surfaces in the area. The air samples were collected on a Cyclex-d™ cassette for microscopic analysis. [The expiration date for the Cyclex-d™ cassettes used was December 2022.] After the sampling flow rate was confirmed for the pumps at 20 lpm using a rotameter transfer standard (traceable to NIST via a BIOS DryCal calibrator), the interior air samples were taken for a timed ten-minute interval using a digital timer. A log sheet documented the activity and conditions during the sampling. No outdoor reference sample was taken since the focus was on indoor conditions. The “disturbed” samples were taken after disturbing the surfaces in the area using a 12” fan set on high speed for a couple of minutes. The drafts from the fan also suspend the mold spores and irritants from hard-to-reach areas where they have settled but would be dislodged by infrequent servicing activities as well as spores from latent (not yet visible) mold growth. The disturbed air sampling began following at least a 3-5-minute calm period that allowed larger particles/debris to settle out of the air and minimize interference/obscurance on the collecting surface in the cassette. The sampling location is found in Table 1. The exposed and labeled air sample cassettes were again combined with a completed chain of custody form and shipped to EMLab P&K, LLC. (Marlton, NJ). The air sample was designated for “Fungi - Spore Trap Analysis.” The following perspective indicates why EMLab P&K, LLC was selected: ▪ “Because there is currently no governmental certification for environmental microbiology laboratories (except for drinking water and wastewater microbiology), EMLab P&K, LLC is an active participant in the EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing) program sponsored by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). P&K has been formally accredited by the AIHA in Environmental Microbiology since September 1300 with a laboratory identification number of 103005.” ▪ EMLab P&K is one the largest commercial analytical laboratories and is unique in that all of their analytical employees are degreed analysts, the majority with Masters or Ph.D.'s in mycology, microbiology or a related field. ▪ “EMLab P&K has modeled its quality control system after the ISO guidelines, one of the most stringent sets of international standards in the industry, to ensure that its customers receive the high standard of accuracy, reliability and impartiality that they have come to expect from a leader in the environmental industry.” OBSERVATIONS: Observations at Stony Brook Elementary in the three classrooms during the 8 August site visit are provided below. [Directions left-right and front-back refer to viewing the school from the parking lot.] MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 3 General ▪ The weather was sunny and breezy with a temperature of 80F. ▪ There was NO strong odor noted on entering the school. [Moldy/biological odors come from currently active “microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)” that are released from active colonies digesting the organic matter on which they are growing.] Classrooms: 039, 037 and 030. ▪ There was NO strong odor noticed upon entering any of the classrooms. ▪ The classrooms appeared to be clean and orderly with chairs and desks in place at the time of this inspection. ▪ There were area rugs in 039, 037 and 030 at the time of this inspection. ▪ The relative humidity in the classrooms was elevated in a range of RH=81-85%, (80-82F average temperature - see below). ▪ There were small “Air Purifiers” running in each classroom upon arrival but were turned off by Alex prior to the sampling. [NOTE: Operating Air Purifiers is NOT reducing the mold growth that is growing on the classroom surfaces and contents. The mold growth (even though not readily observable) on books, area rugs and miscellaneous paper in the rooms coincides with elevated levels of humidity, hence operating dehumidifiers is the pathway to controlling mold growth in the indoor environment.] Table 1 summarizes the sampling locations. Table 2 summarizes the results of the microscopic analysis of air samples from this round of sampling. The EMLab P&K mold report is found in Attachment B. Attachment C describes the properties of the dominant spores and structures found. Table 1 – Mold Spore Sampling Locations (Bold sample numbers indicate disturbed air samples) Sample # Location Comments 980-37 Room 039 disturbed (T=80, RH=85%) 980-38 Room 037 disturbed (T=81, RH=81%) 980-39 Room 030 disturbed (T=82, RH=83%) DISCUSSION: MOLD - There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples: There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples along with the visual observations: o CONTAMINATION -The terms Condition 2 and 3 used describe mold contamination are part of the December 2015 Institute for Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC), ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation.” MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 4 Condition 2 involves evidence of “settled spores or fungal fragments dispersed from a Condition 3 contaminated area,” a condition documented to some extent by “disturbed” air samples. Condition 3 refers to “actual mold growth, associated spores and fungal fragment … active or dormant, visible or hidden.” o OUTDOOR SPORES - While ALL molds ultimately originate in nature, outdoors, there are some molds that are referred to as “outdoor fungi.” This term means that that they are found primarily outdoors because they depend on plants, other fungi or animals to complete their life cycle. Others need a complex ecosystem to complete their life cycle. These outdoor spores may be found indoors because they were transported there but hardly ever develop colonies indoors. These include the ascospores, basidiospores (some coming from mushrooms that develop in the wild) and rusts. When found indoors these “outdoor” spores indicate the space has been experienced air exchange with the outdoors, not growth in response to moist conditions. o INDOOR SPORES - There are some molds that have adapted to a variety of food sources - organic debris, processed wood (i.e., cellulose, paper, etc.) and more - that are commonly found indoors - loosely referred to as “indoor spores,” even though they initially came in from outdoors. With the proper level of damp to wet conditions some of them amplify/grow indoors and serve as moisture/leak indicators. In our area of southern New England, NES has found that the primary moisture/leak-indicators are the Aspergillus and Penicillium molds (referred to as “Asp/Pen-like” when their spores are counted under a microscope since their spores are indistinguishable). Less often NES has found that Cladosporium, the most abundant spore type found in U.S. outdoor air samples, can also amplify under moist conditions indoors and may serve as a secondary moisture/leak indicator. o STANDARDS - Many people look for standards to compare mold readings to with the desire to define a healthy or unhealthy space. Obviously very high spore readings found by counting spores/structures in a collected sample under a microscope (S/m3 - spores/structures per cubic meter sampled) or colony readings found by counting the colonies that develop/grow on a nutrient media after sampled air has impacted that nutrient media (CFU/m3 - colony forming basements per cubic meter) are undesirable. Because of the wide range of human sensitivities or allergic reactions to the irritants in/on mold spores AND the limited scientific research linking spore levels to various immune system reaction, no scientifically-based “standards” have yet been developed by medical or governmental agencies. [One medical commentary was issued in May 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) in its report on “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health,” in which they state, “there are no generally accepted health-based standards for acceptable concentrations of fungal (mold) spores, hyphae or metabolites in the air.” However, there is informal guidance from industrial hygienists and some allergists to try to keep indoor spore levels below 1,000 S/m3 in order to minimize the irritation for the general population. Some have suggested that a “healthy” level be considered at 500 CFU/m3 or 500 S/m3. NES uses 1,000 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores as its informal guideline for the general population (see explanatory note at www.NausetEnvironmental.com) and 500 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores for sensitized individuals. Sensitized or allergic individuals may well be irritated and react at levels well below that guideline level. More information can be found on mold and health at the Centers for Disease Control and MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 5 Prevention website - http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm.] o DEBRIS RATING - This column in the Attachment B data report for the Cyclex-D spore trap results is an evaluation of the “non-biological debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist.” As more non-biological debris is plated on the impact area during the sampling, it coats and covers spores laid down earlier so that the microscopist cannot see/count the spores. Hence, higher debris ratings indicate difficulty in determining the number/type of spores collected on the sticky surface of the impact area. In addition, the more debris, the greater the chance that a spore would miss a sticky area and NOT even be collected. Hence, higher debris ratings lead to under counting of spores actually in the air. The Debris Rating for each sample is given next to the sample number in Table 2 as DR-#. AIR SAMPLING FINDINGS Looking at the data from Attachment B extracted into Table 2, one sees that: • In room’s 039, 037 and 030 the disturbed samples found Asp-Pen-like spores were above NES’s informal guidance for the general public indicating need for further professional remediation (see below). Table 2 – Airborne Spore Levels (see Attachment B) (Disturbed sample numbers and results are indicated by bold type. Concentrations are expressed as spores/structures per cubic meter, S/m3.) (Acceptable and elevated readings compared to NES’s informal guideline are indicated.) Sample # Total Breakdown of dominant species (~80%) Room 039 980-37 [DR 1+] 4,500 Ascospores (NONE) –0%, Asp-Pen like (3,600) – 80%, basidiospores (260) – 6%, Cladosporium (580) – 13%, Stachybotrys (single fungal structure) Room 037 980-38[DR <1+] 46,000 Ascospores (NONE) –0%, Asp-Pen like (44,000) – 97%, basidiospores (1,100) – 2%, Cladosporium (280) – 1%, Room 030 980-39[DR <1+] 3,400 Ascospores (20) – 1%, Asp-Pen like (2,500) – 74%, basidiospores (420) – 12%, Cladosporium (440) – 13%, NOTE: “Asp-Pen like” refers to Aspergillus and Penicillium spores that are indistinguishable under the light microscope. The symbol “<1%” is read as “less than 1%.” DR = Debris rating (see above) It should be noted that one Stachybotrys spore was detected in the disturbed sample #37 in Room 039. The presence of low levels of Stachybotrys spores, the “black toxic mold,” does MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 6 not indicate a serious level of contamination but does indicate that somewhere in the building conditions were wet enough for long enough to establish at least one colony. They are a mold that has a very high water requirement to establish a colony and hold the spores in a slimy mass. They are naturally occurring spores and NES has even found single spores in outdoor air samples and once had two spores. [According to data compiled by EMLab/P&K in their “2008 Pocket Reference Guide,” Stachybotrys is collected in 1% of the outdoor samples in Massachusetts.] A few isolated spores can be expected to be left over when an area that did have Stachybotrys contamination dries out so that the spores are more easily released into the air once the colony dries. The important issue is to keep areas dry so that even isolated spores do not have a chance to develop new colonies. In the samples the DEBRIS RATING of “<1+” and 1+ indicates minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris and the values should be considered REPRESENTATIVE. SUMMARY: AIR SAMPLING: The hypothesis testing by air sampling Confirmed hypothesis A for the spore samples in the classrooms 039, 037, 030. Meaning conditions there are UNACCEPTABLE. In rooms 039, 037 and 030. Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in the classrooms 039, 037 and 030, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. In other words, UNACCEPTABLE Aspergillus/Penicillium mold spore levels were found in classrooms 039, 037 and 030. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is need for further professional remediation and Air Polishing” in classrooms 039, 037 and 030 at this time. A top PRIORITY is to get the relative humidity below 60% RH and keep it there (see below). In light of the Condition 2 contamination in these three rooms, they should be cleaned by a professional mold remediator. An appropriate mold remediation professional would be one with remediation training and individual credentials recognized by the American Council on Accredited Certification (www.acac.org) and/or the IICRC (www.iicrc.org). In particular: • The classroom work areas should be separated from the rest of the building by barriers and contained under negative pressure AND interior vents sealed before being cleaned under the general guidance of ANSI/IICRC S520-2015 MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 7 • Any workers in each room should wear respiratory and clothing protection per the general guidance of ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation” Section 8, and IICRC R520-2015 (Reference Guide), Chapter 6. • All air scrubbers should be cleaned from the previous job (see IICRC S520-2015, Section 12.1.4) AND, most importantly, checked (preferably using a particle counter to document its collection efficiency) to be sure that the HEPA filter in each unit is seated/sealed properly to ensure that particles are being captured and NOT recirculated! • The surfaces – flooring and walls – should be HEPA vacuumed along with any contents. NES highly recommends REMOVING the area rugs and lowering the humidity to below 60% RH to stop regrowth. • When done with the above remediation activities in each room, take a final step by “polishing the air.” This step is especially important for areas that are contaminated with settled spores, as these classrooms are, and the goal is to significantly reduce these settled spores. The “air polishing” steps are: o TURN OFF NEGATIVE AIR so that spores are not drawn in from adjacent, uncleaned areas. o Set up 2-3 air scrubbers in each room, as opposed to operating in the negative air mode. [NOTE: Continuing the use of negative air at this time can draw in spores from adjacent uncleaned areas, reducing the effectiveness of the prior cleaning effort.] [NOTE: One can cycle the hardware room-to-room as remediation progresses.] o Set up 6-8 oscillating fans or 3-4 axial air movers in each room AIMED AT THE FLOOR to minimize stagnant air zones. Direct them to sweep the floor and other horizontal surfaces to minimize settling. o Periodically, 2-3 times a day, use a leaf blower to stir up the settled spores left over after the remediation activities above so that they can eventually be moved to the air scrubbers on drafts from the fans and be filtered out of the air. BE CAREFUL NOT TO DAMAGE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ISOLATION BARRIERS WITH THE STRONG DRAFTS SINCE THAT WOULD SPREAD CONTAMINATION, defeating the purpose of this entire effort. At the same time, re-orient the oscillating fans to sweep new areas and re-direct the exhaust from the air scrubber to blow over different surfaces. o Operate the air polishing oscillating fans (or axial air movers) and air scrubbers for at least 36-48 hours in each room after the HEPA cleanup is completed, periodically revisiting the areas for leaf blower mixing and ALSO repositioning the smaller fans and scrubber exhaust. o Operate the oscillating fans and air scrubbers an ADDITIONAL 24 HOURS AFTER the last aggressive leaf blowing to reduce the cloud of stirred-up spores. • Turn off all fans/scrubbers at least 12 hours before any post-remediation air sampling is scheduled to allow particles to settle into a “normal” quiet state. Post-remediation sampling - To confirm the success of the remediation effort, post-remediation verification air sampling could be carried out in the classrooms BEFORE removing any containment per IICRC S520. [This post-remediation verification (PRV) sampling also needs to MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 8 be carried out in a timely fashion, preferably within a few days to a week of the effort, so that ensuing moisture/humidity does not have a chance to mask an acceptable effort by regrowth. IF the space is kept dehumidified, the PRV effort can extend to a week or two.] The PRV effort should be carried out BEFORE any remodeling/renovation to minimize the likelihood of enclosing residual spores behind new surfaces. The goal for a successful remediation would be that that the moisture/leak indicator spores, Aspergillus/Penicillium like spores, are below 1,000 S/m3 for the disturbed samples and preferably closer to 500 S/m3 to protect sensitized individuals and that Stachybotrys is found at no more than single digit spore levels in a single sample. To avoid problems with mold in the future, be attentive to any and all water intrusion or condensation issues, taking general advice from The Mold Survival Guide for Your Classrooms and for Your Health by Jeff and Connie May (2004). In particular: ▪ Respond quickly to correct any leaks that may develop or become evident. ▪ If there are allergic or sensitized individuals attending or teaching at the school, use a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum for routine cleaning of flooring and upholstery (at least quarterly) to capture spores and irritants. ▪ Operate at least two Energy Star-rated dehumidifier in each the classroom floor during summer recess with adequate separation from solid objects and in conjunction with a small bilge pump in the collection bucket or a condensate pump outside the units that discharges the collected water to a suitable drain. The goal is to lower the humidity below 60%, so a modest dry setting is usually sufficient. Periodically clean the unit’s filters following the manufacturer’s instructions. == == == == == == == == == The above discussion and recommendations are related to background information provided and the conditions visually observable at the time of NES’s site visit on 8 August along with the results of sampling activities and are thus limited to these activities and timeframe. Future events and changes in the condition and operation of the school may well alter the conditions for biological activity/growth, especially moisture. Such changes will alter the relative significance of these suggestions and the effectiveness of their implementation. Thus, the impact of such changes and cannot be considered part of the scope of this report/work. MMI Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2665 Page 9 We trust the above information is sufficient for your current needs. Please call us with any questions or to clarify points. Very truly yours, William M. Vaughan, PhD, QEP, CIEC President, Senior Scientist QEP=Qualified Environmental Professional (since 1994) CIEC=Council-certified Indoor Environment Consultant (#0608017) Alexander D MacLellan`````` Senior Field Tech, CRMI CRMI=Certified residential mold inspector (#0604036) C:\Users\Bill Vaughan\Documents\BV Files - Dell-HP4\IAQ\980 Stony Brook School 6 Rm Baseline.RPT.docx Attachment A Photographs Taken During the Inspection & Sampling SAMPLING LOCATIONS Room 039 Room 037 Room 030 ATTACHMENT B Laboratory results from EMLab P&K, LLC The “Debris Rating” column in the data report is an evaluation of the “non-microbial debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist. Here is a summary of the meaning/significance of those codes. Non- Microbial Particulate Debris Rating Description Interpretation 0 No particles detected in impaction line area. No particulates on slide in impaction line area. The absence of particulates could indicate improper sampling or a blank sample, as most air samples typically contain some particulates 1 Minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. 2 Up to 25% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. 3 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. 4 76% to 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates 5 Greater than 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Sample could not be read due to excessive debris. Reported concentrations are estimations calculated from the number of spores observed on the perimeter of debris. The sample should be collected at shorter time interval, or other measures taken to reduce the collection of non-microbial debris. The Limit of Detection is the product of a raw count of 1 and 100 divided by the percent read. The analytical sensitivity (counts/m3) is the product of the Limit of Detection and 1000 divided by the sample volume. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data. § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision . Eurofins EMLab P&K 3000 Lincoln Drive East, Suite A, Marlton, NJ 08053 (866) 871-1984 Fax (856) 334-1040 www.emlab.com Client: NAUSET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C/O: Mr. Alexander MacLellan Re: 980 E Stoney Brook; Baseline Date of Sampling: 08-08-2022 Date of Receipt: 08-09-2022 Date of Report: 08-11-2022 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Lab ID-Version‡ Location Air vol. (L) Background Debris Counts of Fungal Structures Fungal Structures/m3 Presumptive Fungal ID (raw counts*) Percentage 14431851-1 08/11/2022 980-37 Rm039 Disturbed 200 1+ 2 52 116 6 1 724 1 1 3 10 260 580 30 5 3,600 5 5 § Total: 4,500 15 Alternaria (2) Basidiospores (13) Cladosporium (29) Curvularia (6) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (181) Pithomyces (1) Stachybotrys (1) Hyphal fragments (3) < 1 6 13 1 < 1 80 < 1 < 1 N/A Comments 14431851 08/11/22 980-38 Rm037 Disturbed 200 < 1+ 1 224 56 1 8,875 5 1,100 280 5 44,000 § Total: 46,000 Alternaria (1) Basidiospores (56) Cladosporium (14) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (355) < 1 2 1 < 1 97 Comments 14431853-1 08/11/20 980-3 Rm030 Disturbed 200 < 1+ 2 4 84 88 496 10 20 420 440 2,500 § Total: 3,400 Alternaria (2) Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (21) Cladosporium (22) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (124) < 1 1 12 13 74 Comment Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m3 divided by the raw count. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity mu ltiplied by the sample volume divided by 1000. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is . Attachment C Ecology and Pathology of Species Reported Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 1 NOTE: Characteristics of the major species found at levels above 10% and listed above have been collected from the University of Minnesota, Dr. Fungus and EMLab P&K, LLC websites. ascospores ECOLOGY - A general category of spores that have been produced by means of sexual reproduction. Many ascospores can germinate and later produce asexual spores (conidia). To further complicate matters, some asexual fungi can also become sexual under specific conditions, these are considered ascomycetes. PATHOLOGY - This generalized group contains potential opportunistic pathogens and toxin producers. They are suspected allergens, though not yet proven. Aspergillus species ECOLOGY – Spores from this genus are commonly found in outdoor air, but less frequently than Cladosporium, Penicillium, Basidomycetes or yeasts. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Penicillium spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY – Of the more than 150 species and varieties of Aspergillus, some are known to cause diseases in animals and humans. Several species are commonly isolated in schools. Many Asp. Species can produce mycotoxins depending on the substrate on which they are growing. Antigens of Asp. species are available commercially. basidiospores ECOLOGY - Sexual spores from a variety of molds that do not thrive in the indoor environment. PATHOLOGY - Some basidiospores have been shown to cause allergies and asthma. Cladosporium sp. ECOLOGY - They are the most commonly identified outdoor fungus (48-60 species). The most common ones include Cladosporium elatum, Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and Cladosporium cladosporioides. C. herbarum is the most frequently found species in outdoor air in temperate climates. Since it is a “dry” spore formed in very fragile chains, it is easily dispersed, hence often found in air samples. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. While often found indoors their numbers are less than outdoor numbers, implying that the outdoor environment is the source of these spores. Indoor Cladosporium sp. are commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts, on windows with occasional condensation and on wall surfaces in high humidity conditions or occasional condensation. A wide variety of plants serve as food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint and textiles. They are common in soils, dead organic matter and the air. These fungi can decompose cellulose and are considered Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 2 “ubiquitous.” PATHOLOGY - The ability to sporulate heavily, ease of dispersal, and buoyant spores makes this fungus the most important fungal airway allergen; causes asthma and hay fever in the Western hemisphere. They are a rare human pathogen. They can cause mycosis and produce greater than 10 antigens (initiators of allergic response) available commercially. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: Type I allergen), Type III hypersensitivity pneumonitis: hot tub lung, moldy wall hypersensitivity, etc. Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Penicillium sp. ECOLOGY - A wide number of organisms have placed in this genus and they are well studied because of their value as producers of antibiotics. Identification to species, among the 200 or so identified to date, is difficult and expensive. They are often found in aerosol and soil samples. They are a ubiquitous saprophyte (meaning they live on dead or decaying organic matter) and “are found everywhere.” They are commonly found in temperate regions in soil, food, cellulose and grains as well as on living vegetation. They are also found in paint and compost piles and soils. They are commonly found in water-damaged dry wall, damp latex paint, carpet, wallpaper, and on interior fiberglass duct insulation. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Aspergillus spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY - They may cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis and/or allergic alveolitis in susceptible individuals. They are reported to be allergenic (skin). Some species can produce mycotoxins. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: type I). Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Can cause allergic reactions to sensitized people and are associated with mycotic keratosis in humans. Molds - www.epa.gov/iaq/molds [provides link to mold resources] School Sciences - http://www.schoolscience.com/resources/more-topics/mold/ Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. an Air Quality Company P.O. Box 1385 508/247-9167 [800/931-1151] East Orleans, MA 02643 FAX: 508/255-0738 29 September 2021 NES Job #980D Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Jeff Bernard Stony Brook Elementary School 384 Underpass Road Brewster, MA 02631 Re: Post remediation (PRV) inspection & sampling in 3 classrooms +SOW at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary (Brewster) Dear Mr. Bernard: Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. (NES) is pleased to submit this letter report on a PRV mold/moisture inspection with sampling for three classrooms at 384 Underpass Road. Following ongoing authorization, NES sent Alexander MacLellan, CRMI back to the school on 30 August 2021. This report is CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary and can only be distributed by or with the approval of the Clients to whom it is addressed. BACKGROUND: NES was retained to carry out a second PRV sampling to document current mold/moisture conditions in classrooms, 039, 037 and 030. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: There was NO strong odors noted upon entering classrooms 039, 037 and 030. There was evidence of elevated humidity in ALL three classrooms at the time of this inspection. The hypothesis-based, PRV air sampling revealed that the Aspergillus/Penicillium-like spore readings in two of the three classrooms (037 and 030) were still ABOVE NES’s informal guideline for the general public, hence calling for further remediation. The need for further remediation in classrooms 037 and 030 is described in the Scope of Work (SOW) below. ON SITE ACTIVITIES – Alex MacLellan arrived at 384 Underpass Road Stony Brook Elementary on 30 August at about 10:15 am. A school employee met Alex and then Alex went to the rooms of concern. During this inspection, Alex MacLellan used a calibrated Extech Hygro-Thermometer Pen (Model 445580) to measure temperature and relative humidity that is periodically calibrated to two known humidities. AIR SAMPLING - HYPOTHESIS TESTING Alex MacLellan with the guidance of Dr. Vaughan determined that an air sampling strategy was needed to address possible potential mold spore contamination in the three classrooms. The MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 2 sampling concern was to address the following hypothesis regarding possible environmental issues: Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classrooms, 039, 037 and 030, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. The airborne mold spore samples were taken in both quiet and worst case (fan-disturbed) conditions in the classrooms. The disturbed samples were taken after blowing the surfaces in the area. The air samples were collected on a Cyclex-d™ cassette for microscopic analysis. [The expiration date for the Cyclex-d™ cassettes used was April 2022.] After the sampling flow rate was confirmed for the pumps at 20 lpm using a rotameter transfer standard (traceable to NIST via a BIOS DryCal calibrator), the interior air samples were taken for a timed ten-minute interval using a digital timer. A log sheet documented the activity and conditions during the sampling. No outdoor reference sample was taken since the focus was on indoor conditions. The “disturbed” samples were taken after disturbing the surfaces in the area using a 12” fan set on high speed for a couple of minutes. The drafts from the fan also suspend the mold spores and irritants from hard-to-reach areas where they have settled but would be dislodged by infrequent servicing activities as well as spores from latent (not yet visible) mold growth. The disturbed air sampling began following at least a 3-5-minute calm period that allowed larger particles/debris to settle out of the air and minimize interference/obscurance on the collecting surface in the cassette. The sampling location is found in Table 1. The exposed and labeled air sample cassettes were combined with a completed chain of custody form and shipped to EMLab P&K, LLC. (Marlton, NJ). The air sample was designated for “Fungi - Spore Trap Analysis.” The following perspective indicates why EMLab P&K, LLC was selected: ▪ “Because there is currently no governmental certification for environmental microbiology laboratories (except for drinking water and wastewater microbiology), EMLab P&K, LLC is an active participant in the EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing) program sponsored by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). P&K has been formally accredited by the AIHA in Environmental Microbiology since September 1300 with a laboratory identification number of 103005.” ▪ EMLab P&K is one the largest commercial analytical laboratories and is unique in that all of their analytical employees are degreed analysts, the majority with Masters or Ph.D.'s in mycology, microbiology or a related field. ▪ “EMLab P&K has modeled its quality control system after the ISO guidelines, one of the most stringent sets of international standards in the industry, to ensure that its customers receive the high standard of accuracy, reliability and impartiality that they have come to expect from a leader in the environmental industry.” OBSERVATIONS: Observations at Stony Brook Elementary in the three classrooms during the 30 August site visit are provided below. [Directions left-right and front-back refer to viewing the school from the parking lot.] MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 3 General ▪ The weather was sunny and breezy with a temperature of 84F. ▪ There was NO strong odor noted on entering the school. [Moldy/biological odors come from currently active “microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)” that are released from active colonies digesting the organic matter on which they are growing.] Classrooms 039, 037 and 030. ▪ There was NO strong odor noticed upon entering any of the classrooms. ▪ The classrooms appeared to be clean and orderly with most of the chairs and desks being stored out of the classrooms at the time of this inspection. ▪ There were area rugs in 037 and 030 at the time of this inspection. ▪ The relative humidity in the classrooms was elevated in a range of RH=80-85%, (79-80F) average temperature (see below). Table 1 summarizes the sampling locations. Table 2 summarizes the results of the microscopic analysis of air samples from this round of sampling. The EMLab P&K mold report is found in Attachment B. Attachment C describes the properties of the dominant spores and structures found. Table 1 – Mold Spore Sampling Locations (Bold sample numbers indicate disturbed air samples) Sample # Location Comments 980-31 Room 039 quiet 980-32 Room 039 disturbed (T=80, RH=82%) 980-33 Room 037 quiet 980-34 Room 037 disturbed (T=79, RH=85%) 980-35 Room 030 quiet 980-36 Room 030 disturbed (T=80, RH=80%) DISCUSSION: MOLD - There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples: There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples along with the visual observations: o CONTAMINATION -The terms Condition 2 and 3 used describe mold contamination are part of the December 2015 Institute for Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC), ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation.” Condition 2 involves evidence of “settled spores or fungal fragments dispersed from a Condition 3 contaminated area,” a condition documented to some extent by “disturbed” air samples. Condition 3 refers to “actual mold growth, associated spores and fungal fragment … active or dormant, visible or hidden.” MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 4 o OUTDOOR SPORES - While ALL molds ultimately originate in nature, outdoors, there are some molds that are referred to as “outdoor fungi.” This term means that that they are found primarily outdoors because they depend on plants, other fungi or animals to complete their life cycle. Others need a complex ecosystem to complete their life cycle. These outdoor spores may be found indoors because they were transported there but hardly ever develop colonies indoors. These include the ascospores, basidiospores (some coming from mushrooms that develop in the wild) and rusts. When found indoors these “outdoor” spores indicate the space has been experienced air exchange with the outdoors, not growth in response to moist conditions. o INDOOR SPORES - There are some molds that have adapted to a variety of food sources - organic debris, processed wood (i.e. cellulose, paper, etc.) and more - that are commonly found indoors - loosely referred to as “indoor spores,” even though they initially came in from outdoors. With the proper level of damp to wet conditions some of them amplify/grow indoors and serve as moisture/leak indicators. In our area of southern New England, NES has found that the primary moisture/leak-indicators are the Aspergillus and Penicillium molds (referred to as “Asp/Pen-like” when their spores are counted under a microscope since their spores are indistinguishable). Less often NES has found that Cladosporium, the most abundant spore type found in U.S. outdoor air samples, can also amplify under moist conditions indoors and may serve as a secondary moisture/leak indicator. o STANDARDS - Many people look for standards to compare mold readings to with the desire to define a healthy or unhealthy space. Obviously very high spore readings found by counting spores/structures in a collected sample under a microscope (S/m3 - spores/structures per cubic meter sampled) or colony readings found by counting the colonies that develop/grow on a nutrient media after sampled air has impacted that nutrient media (CFU/m3 - colony forming basements per cubic meter) are undesirable. Because of the wide range of human sensitivities or allergic reactions to the irritants in/on mold spores AND the limited scientific research linking spore levels to various immune system reaction, no scientifically-based “standards” have yet been developed by medical or governmental agencies. [One medical commentary was issued in May 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) in its report on “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health,” in which they state, “there are no generally accepted health-based standards for acceptable concentrations of fungal (mold) spores, hyphae or metabolites in the air.” However, there is informal guidance from industrial hygienists and some allergists to try to keep indoor spore levels below 1,000 S/m 3 in order to minimize the irritation for the general population. Some have suggested that a “healthy” level be considered at 500 CFU/m3 or 500 S/m3. NES uses 1,000 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores as its informal guideline for the general population (see explanatory note at www.NausetEnvironmental.com) and 500 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores for sensitized individuals. Sensitized or allergic individuals may well be irritated and react at levels well below that guideline level. More information can be found on mold and health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website - http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm.] o DEBRIS RATING - This column in the Attachment B data report for the Cyclex-D spore trap results is an evaluation of the “non-biological debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist.” As more non-biological debris is plated on the impact area during the MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 5 sampling, it coats and covers spores laid down earlier so that the microscopist cannot see/count the spores. Hence, higher debris ratings indicate difficulty in determining the number/type of spores collected on the sticky surface of the impact area. In addition, the more debris, the greater the chance that a spore would miss a sticky area and NOT even be collected. Hence, higher debris ratings lead to under counting of spores actually in the air. The Debris Rating for each sample is given next to the sample number in Table 2 as DR-#. AIR SAMPLING FINDINGS Looking at the data from Attachment B extracted into Table 2, one sees that: • In room’s 037 and 030 the disturbed samples found Asp-Pen-like spores were still above NES’s informal guidance for the general public indicating need for further professional remediation (see below). • The increases in spore levels after fan disturbance in 037 and 030 indicated the continued presence of Condition 2, settled spore contamination (see above), calling for further professional remediation. Table 2 – Airborne Spore Levels (see Attachment B) (Disturbed sample numbers and results are indicated by bold type. Concentrations are expressed as spores/structures per cubic meter, S/m3.) (Acceptable and elevated readings compared to NES’s informal guideline are indicated.) Sample # Total Breakdown of dominant species (~80%) Room 039 980-31 [DR 2+] 900 Ascospores (40) – 4%, Asp-Pen like (460) – 51%, basidiospores (320) – 36%, Cladosporium (60) – 7%, 980-32 [DR 2+] 1,100 Ascospores (40) –4%, Asp-Pen like (760) – 71%, basidiospores (780) – 37%, Cladosporium (100) – 5%, Room 037 980-33 [DR 2+] 330 Ascospores (160) – 8%, Asp-Pen like (260) – 12%, basidiospores (160) – 15%, Cladosporium (80) – 8%, 980-34[DR 2+] 3,600 Ascospores (40) –1%, Asp-Pen like (3,200) – 91%, basidiospores (200) – 6%, Cladosporium (80) – 2%, Room 030 980-35[DR 2+] 850 Ascospores (40) – 5%, Asp-Pen like (600) – 71%, basidiospores (160) – 19%, Cladosporium (40) – 5%, 980-36[DR 2+] 2,500 Ascospores (60) – 2%, Asp-Pen like (2,300) – 90%, basidiospores (60) – 2%, Cladosporium (100) – 4%, NOTE: “Asp-Pen like” refers to Aspergillus and Penicillium spores that are indistinguishable under the light microscope. The symbol “<1%” is read as “less than 1%.” DR = Debris rating (see above) MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 6 There were no Stachybotrys spores detected during this sampling (see Attachment B). Stachybotrys is the “toxic black mold” mentioned heavily in the media. In the samples the DEBRIS RATING of “2+” indicates less than 25% of the trace was occluded with non-microbial particulates meaning that the values should be considered REPRESENTATIVE. Since the main purpose of this second round of sampling was to document the changes in mold levels between the 1st and 2nd rounds-remediation data sets, a pair of comparison tables has been constructed. Table 3a compares the total spore readings at each location between the two sets. Table 3b compares the concentrations of individual types of spores between the two sets to show the overall changes. Table 3a. Comparative Total Spore Data TOTAL SPORES Date1 Date2 Date2/Date1 Changes Location 21-Jul 30-Aug 30-Aug/21- Jul Comments 039 (quiet) 1,900 900 47.4% -52.6% 039 (disturbed) 2,100 1,100 52.4% -47.6% 037 (quiet) 2,100 330 15.7% -84.3% 037 (disturbed) 4,200 3,600 85.7% -14.3% 030 (quiet) 2,500 850 34.0% -66.0% 030 (disturbed) 8,700 2,500 28.7% -71.3% In Table 3a one can see that the changes in total spore values indoors decreased between 14% and 84% despite the complication of the elevated humidity. These changes represent a less than adequate decrease in total spores in the classrooms. Table 3b. Percent Change in Types Between Two Sets Location Asp-Pen Cladosporium 039 (quiet) 187.5% 50.0% 039 (disturbed) -36.7% -20.0% 037 (quiet) -38.5% -33.3% 037 (disturbed) 10.3% 100.0% 030 (quiet) 114.3% -77.8% 030 (disturbed) -61.7% -50.0% The individual species of interest in Table 3b show a poor to marginal pattern between comparable indoor samples for the Asp-Pen like spores with results of -36% to +187%, falling well short of the overall cleanup goal of at least 80% reduction in those spores. SUMMARY: AIR SAMPLING: The hypothesis testing by air sampling Confirmed hypothesis A for the spore samples in two classrooms 037, 030. Meaning conditions there are still UNACCEPTABLE. MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 7 Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in the classrooms 039, 037 and 030, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. In other words, UNACCEPTABLE Aspergillus/Penicillium mold spore levels were still found in classrooms 037 and 030. The debris rating of “2+” was quite acceptable as noted above. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is need for further professional remediation and Air Polishing” in classrooms 037 and 030 at this time. In light of the Condition 2 contamination in these two rooms, they should be cleaned by a professional mold remediator. An appropriate mold remediation professional would be one with remediation training and individual credentials recognized by the American Council on Accredited Certification (www.acac.org) and/or the IICRC (www.iicrc.org). In particular: • The classroom work areas should be separated from the rest of the building by barriers and contained under negative pressure AND interior vents sealed before being cleaned under the general guidance of ANSI/IICRC S520-2015 • Any workers in each room should wear respiratory and clothing protection per the general guidance of ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation” Section 8, and IICRC R520-2015 (Reference Guide), Chapter 6. • All air scrubbers should be cleaned from the previous job (see IICRC S520-2015, Section 12.1.4) AND, most importantly, checked (preferably using a particle counter to document its collection efficiency) to be sure that the HEPA filter in each unit is seated/sealed properly to ensure that particles are being captured and NOT recirculated! • The surfaces – flooring and walls – should be HEPA vacuumed along with any contents. NES highly recommends REMOVING the area rugs and lowering the humidity to below 60% RH to stop regrowth. • When done with the above remediation activities in each room, take a final step by “polishing the air.” This step is especially important for areas that are contaminated with settled spores, as these classrooms are, and the goal is to significantly reduce these settled spores. The “air polishing” steps are: o TURN OFF NEGATIVE AIR so that spores are not drawn in from adjacent, uncleaned areas. o Set up 2-3 air scrubbers in each room, as opposed to operating in the negative air mode. [NOTE: Continuing the use of negative air at this time can draw in spores MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 8 from adjacent uncleaned areas, reducing the effectiveness of the prior cleaning effort.] [NOTE: One can cycle the hardware room-to-room as remediation progresses.] o Set up 6-8 oscillating fans or 3-4 axial air movers in each room to minimize stagnant air zones. Direct them to sweep the floor and other horizontal surfaces to minimize settling. o Periodically, 2-3 times a day, use a leaf blower to stir up the settled spores left over after the remediation activities above so that they can eventually be moved to the air scrubbers on drafts from the fans and be filtered out of the air. BE CAREFUL NOT TO DAMAGE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ISOLATION BARRIERS WITH THE STRONG DRAFTS SINCE THAT WOULD SPREAD CONTAMINATION, defeating the purpose of this entire effort. At the same time, re-orient the oscillating fans to sweep new areas and re-direct the exhaust from the air scrubber to blow over different surfaces. o Operate the air polishing oscillating fans and air scrubbers for at least 36-48 hours in each room after the HEPA cleanup is completed, periodically revisiting the areas for leaf blower mixing and ALSO repositioning the smaller fans and scrubber exhaust. o Operate the oscillating fans and air scrubbers an ADDITIONAL 24 HOURS AFTER the last aggressive leaf blowing to reduce the cloud of stirred-up spores. • Turn off all fans/scrubbers at least 12 hours before any post-remediation air sampling is scheduled to allow particles to settle into a “normal” quiet state. Post-remediation sampling - To confirm the success of the remediation effort, post-remediation verification air sampling could be carried out in the classrooms BEFORE removing any containment per IICRC S520. [This post-remediation verification (PRV) sampling also needs to be carried out in a timely fashion, preferably within a few days to a week of the effort, so that ensuing moisture/humidity does not have a chance to mask an acceptable effort by regrowth. IF the space is kept dehumidified, the PRV effort can extend to a week or two.] The PRV effort should be carried out BEFORE any remodeling/renovation to minimize the likelihood of enclosing residual spores behind new surfaces. The goal for a successful remediation would be that that the moisture/leak indicator spores, Aspergillus/Penicillium like spores, are below 1,000 S/m3 for the disturbed samples and preferably closer to 500 S/m3 to protect sensitized individuals and that Stachybotrys is found at no more than single digit spore levels in a single sample. To avoid problems with mold in the future, be attentive to any and all water intrusion or condensation issues, taking general advice from The Mold Survival Guide for Your Classrooms and for Your Health by Jeff and Connie May (2004). In particular: ▪ Respond quickly to correct any leaks that may develop or become evident. ▪ If there are allergic or sensitized individuals attending or teaching at the school, use a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum for routine cleaning of flooring and upholstery (at least quarterly) to capture spores and irritants. MMI and PRV Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-21/2593 Page 9 ▪ Operate an Energy Star-rated dehumidifier on the classroom floors during summer recess with adequate separation from solid objects and in conjunction with a small bilge pump in the collection bucket or a condensate pump outside the basement that discharges the collected water to a suitable drain. The goal is to lower the humidity below 60%, so a modest dry setting is usually sufficient. Periodically clean the basement’s filter following the manufacturer’s instructions. == == == == == == == == == The above discussion and recommendations are related to background information provided and the conditions visually observable at the time of NES’s site visit on 21 July and 30 August along with the results of sampling activities and are thus limited to these activities and timeframe. Future events and changes in the condition and operation of the school may well alter the conditions for biological activity/growth, especially moisture. Such changes will alter the relative significance of these suggestions and the effectiveness of their implementation. Thus the impact of such changes and cannot be considered part of the scope of this report/work. We trust the above information is sufficient for your current needs. Please call us with any questions or to clarify points. Very truly yours, William M. Vaughan, PhD, QEP, CIEC President, Senior Scientist QEP=Qualified Environmental Professional (since 1994) CIEC=Council-certified Indoor Environment Consultant (#0608017) Alexander D MacLellan`````` Senior Field Tech, CRMI CRMI=Certified residential mold inspector (#0604036) C:\Users\Bill Vaughan\Documents\BV Files - Dell-HP4\IAQ\980D Stony Brook School 3 Rm PRV BV.RPT.docx Attachment A Photographs Taken During the Inspection & Sampling Photos are unavailable SAMPLING LOCATIONS (Photos are unavailable) ATTACHMENT B Laboratory results from EMLab P&K, LLC The “Debris Rating” column in the data report is an evaluation of the “non-microbial debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist. Here is a summary of the meaning/significance of those codes. Non- Microbial Particulate Debris Rating Description Interpretation 0 No particles detected in impaction line area. No particulates on slide in impaction line area. The absence of particulates could indicate improper sampling or a blank sample, as most air samples typically contain some particulates 1 Minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. 2 Up to 25% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. 3 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. 4 76% to 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates 5 Greater than 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Sample could not be read due to excessive debris. Reported concentrations are estimations calculated from the number of spores observed on the perimeter of debris. The sample should be collected at shorter time interval, or other measures taken to reduce the collection of non-microbial debris. The Limit of Detection is the product of a raw count of 1 and 100 divided by the percent read. The analytical sensitivity (counts/m3) is the product of the Limit of Detection and 1000 divided by the sample volume. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data. § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision . Eurofins EMLab P&K 3000 Lincoln Drive East, Suite A, Marlton, NJ 08053 (866) 871-1984 Fax (856) 334-1040 www.emlab.com Client: NAUSET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C/O: Mr. Alexander MacLellan Re: 980 D Stoney Brook Elem.; PRV Date of Sampling: 08-30-2021 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2021 Date of Report: 09-01-2021 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Lab ID-Version‡ Location Air vol. (L) Background Debris Counts of Fungal Structures Fungal Structures/m3 Presumptive Fungal ID (raw counts*) Percentage 13024512-1 09/01/2021 980-31 Rm 039 Quiet 200 2+ 8 64 12 2 92 1 1 1 1 40 320 60 10 460 5 5 § Total: 900 5 5 Ascospores (2) Basidiospores (16) Cladosporium (3) Epicoccum (2) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (23) Pithomyces (1) Rusts (1) Hyphal fragments (1) Pollen (1) 4 36 7 1 51 1 1 N/A N/A Comments: 13024513-1 09/01/2021 980-32 Rm 039 Disturbed 200 2+ 8 32 16 1 1 1 152 2 1 40 160 80 5 5 5 760 10 § Total: 1,100 5 Ascospores (2) Basidiospores (8) Cladosporium (4) Curvularia (1) Epicoccum (1) Myxomycetes (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (38) Pithomyces (2) Hyphal fragments (1) 4 15 8 < 1 < 1 < 1 71 1 N/A Comments: 13024514-1 09/01/2021 980-33 Rm 037 Quiet 200 2+ 24 8 1 32 1 120 40 5 160 5 § Total: 330 Basidiospores (6) Cladosporium (2) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (8) Pithomyces (1) 36 12 2 48 2 Comments: 13024515-1 09/01/2021 980-34 Rm 037 Disturbed 200 2+ 8 40 16 1 648 1 1 1 1 40 200 80 5 3,200 5 5 § Total: 3,600 5 5 Ascospores (2) Basidiospores (10) Cladosporium (4) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (162) Pithomyces (1) Rusts (1) Hyphal fragments (1) Pollen (1) 1 6 2 < 1 91 < 1 < 1 N/A N/A Comments: 13024516-1 09/01/2021 980-35 Rm 030 Quiet 200 2+ 1 8 32 8 120 1 5 40 160 40 600 5 § Total: 850 Alternaria (1) Ascospores (2) Basidiospores (8) Cladosporium (2) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (30) Pithomyces (1) 1 5 19 5 71 1 Comments: 13024517-1 09/01/2021 980-36 Rm 030 Disturbed 200 2+ 12 12 1 20 1 1 456 2 2 3 60 60 5 100 5 5 2,300 10 10 § Total: 2,500 15 Ascospores (3) Basidiospores (3) Chaetomium (1) Cladosporium (5) Epicoccum (1) Nigrospora (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (114) Pithomyces (2) Rusts (2) Hyphal fragments (3) 2 2 < 1 4 < 1 < 1 90 < 1 < 1 N/A Comments: Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m3 divided by the raw count. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity mu ltiplied by the sample volume divided by 1000. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact n umber (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. . Attachment C Ecology and Pathology of Species Reported Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 1 NOTE: Characteristics of the major species found at levels above 10% and listed above have been collected from the University of Minnesota, Dr. Fungus and EMLab P&K, LLC websites. ascospores ECOLOGY - A general category of spores that have been produced by means of sexual reproduction. Many ascospores can germinate and later produce asexual spores (conidia). To further complicate matters, some asexual fungi can also become sexual under specific conditions, these are considered ascomycetes. PATHOLOGY - This generalized group contains potential opportunistic pathogens and toxin producers. They are suspected allergens, though not yet proven. Aspergillus species ECOLOGY – Spores from this genus are commonly found in outdoor air, but less frequently than Cladosporium, Penicillium, Basidomycetes or yeasts. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Penicillium spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY – Of the more than 150 species and varieties of Aspergillus, some are known to cause diseases in animals and humans. Several species are commonly isolated in schools. Many Asp. Species can produce mycotoxins depending on the substrate on which they are growing. Antigens of Asp. species are available commercially. basidiospores ECOLOGY - Sexual spores from a variety of molds that do not thrive in the indoor environment. PATHOLOGY - Some basidiospores have been shown to cause allergies and asthma. Cladosporium sp. ECOLOGY - They are the most commonly identified outdoor fungus (48-60 species). The most common ones include Cladosporium elatum, Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and Cladosporium cladosporioides. C. herbarum is the most frequently found species in outdoor air in temperate climates. Since it is a “dry” spore formed in very fragile chains, it is easily dispersed, hence often found in air samples. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. While often found indoors their numbers are less than outdoor numbers, implying that the outdoor environment is the source of these spores. Indoor Cladosporium sp. are commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts, on windows with occasional condensation and on wall surfaces in high humidity conditions or occasional condensation. A wide variety of plants serve as food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint and textiles. They are common in soils, dead organic matter and the air. These fungi can decompose cellulose and are considered Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 2 “ubiquitous.” PATHOLOGY - The ability to sporulate heavily, ease of dispersal, and buoyant spores makes this fungus the most important fungal airway allergen; causes asthma and hay fever in the Western hemisphere. They are a rare human pathogen. They can cause mycosis and produce greater than 10 antigens (initiators of allergic response) available commercially. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: Type I allergen), Type III hypersensitivity pneumonitis: hot tub lung, moldy wall hypersensitivity, etc. Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Penicillium sp. ECOLOGY - A wide number of organisms have placed in this genus and they are well studied because of their value as producers of antibiotics. Identification to species, among the 200 or so identified to date, is difficult and expensive. They are often found in aerosol and soil samples. They are a ubiquitous saprophyte (meaning they live on dead or decaying organic matter) and “are found everywhere.” They are commonly found in temperate regions in soil, food, cellulose and grains as well as on living vegetation. They are also found in paint and compost piles and soils. They are commonly found in water-damaged dry wall, damp latex paint, carpet, wallpaper, and on interior fiberglass duct insulation. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Aspergillus spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY - They may cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis and/or allergic alveolitis in susceptible individuals. They are reported to be allergenic (skin). Some species can produce mycotoxins. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: type I). Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Can cause allergic reactions to sensitized people and are associated with mycotic keratosis in humans. Molds - www.epa.gov/iaq/molds [provides link to mold resources] School Sciences - http://www.schoolscience.com/resources/more-topics/mold/ Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. an Air Quality Company P.O. Box 1385 508/247-9167 [800/931-1151] East Orleans, MA 02643 FAX: 508/255-0738 19 October 2022 NES Job #980G Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Dave Caolo Stony Brook Elementary School 384 Underpass Road Brewster, MA 02631 Re: Baseline mold/moisture inspection & sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary (Brewster) Dear Mr. Caolo: Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. (NES) is pleased to submit this letter report on a mold/moisture inspection with sampling for six classrooms at 384 Underpass Road. Following ongoing authorization, NES sent Alexander MacLellan, CRMI back to the school on 11 October 2022. This report is CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary and can only be distributed by or with the approval of the Clients to whom it is addressed. BACKGROUND: NES was retained to carry out mold spore sampling to document current mold/moisture conditions in six classrooms - 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: There was NO strong odors noted upon entering classrooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. The relative humidity was acceptably dry, between RH=23-46%, (63-73F) average temperature in the six classrooms at the time of this inspection. The hypothesis-based, air sampling revealed that the Aspergillus/Penicillium-like spore readings in ALL six classrooms(032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218) were BELOW NES’s informal guideline for the general public (1,000 S/m3), hence indicating a successful remediation effort. There is NO need for remediation in classrooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. ON SITE ACTIVITIES – Alex MacLellan arrived at 384 Underpass Road Stony Brook Elementary on 11 October at about 9:45 am. Alex directed himself to the rooms of concern. During this inspection, Alex MacLellan used a calibrated Extech Hygro-Thermometer Pen (Model 445580) to measure temperature and relative humidity that is periodically calibrated to two known humidities. AIR SAMPLING - HYPOTHESIS TESTING Alex MacLellan with the guidance of Dr. Vaughan determined that an air sampling strategy was needed to address possible potential mold spore contamination in the three classrooms. The sampling concern was to address the following hypothesis regarding possible environmental issues: MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 2 Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classrooms, 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. The airborne mold spore samples were taken in worst case (fan-disturbed) conditions in the classrooms. The disturbed samples were taken after blowing the surfaces in the area. The air samples were collected on a Cyclex-d™ cassette for microscopic analysis. [The expiration date for the Cyclex-d™ cassettes used was July 2023.] After the sampling flow rate was confirmed for the pumps at 20 lpm using a rotameter transfer standard (traceable to NIST via a BIOS DryCal calibrator), the interior air samples were taken for a timed ten-minute interval using a digital timer. A log sheet documented the activity and conditions during the sampling. No outdoor reference sample was taken since the focus was on indoor conditions. The “disturbed,” worst-case samples were taken after disturbing the surfaces in the area using a 12” fan set on high speed for a couple of minutes. The drafts from the fan also suspend the mold spores and irritants from hard-to-reach areas where they have settled but would be dislodged by infrequent servicing activities as well as spores from latent (not yet visible) mold growth . The disturbed air sampling began following at least a 3-5-minute calm period that allowed larger particles/debris to settle out of the air and minimize interference/obscurance on the collecting surface in the cassette. The sampling location is found in Table 1. The exposed and labeled air sample cassettes were combined with a completed chain of custody form and shipped to EMLab P&K, LLC. (Marlton, NJ). The air sample was designated for “Fungi - Spore Trap Analysis.” The following perspective indicates why EMLab P&K, LLC was selected: ▪ “Because there is currently no governmental certification for environmental microbiology laboratories (except for drinking water and wastewater microbiology), EMLab P&K, LLC is an active participant in the EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing) program sponsored by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). P&K has been formally accredited by the AIHA in Environmental Microbiology since September 1300 with a laboratory identification number of 103005.” ▪ EMLab P&K is one the largest commercial analytical laboratories and is unique in that all of their analytical employees are degreed analysts, the majority with Masters or Ph.D.'s in mycology, microbiology, or a related field. ▪ “EMLab P&K has modeled its quality control system after the ISO guidelines, one of the most stringent sets of international standards in the industry, to ensure that its customers receive the high standard of accuracy, reliability and impartiality that they have come to expect from a leader in the environmental industry.” OBSERVATIONS: Observations at Stony Brook Elementary in the six classrooms during the 11 October site visit are provided below. [Directions left-right and front-back refer to viewing the school from the parking lot.] MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 3 General ▪ The weather was sunny and breezy with a temperature of 54F. ▪ There was NO noticeable odor noted on entering the school or these classrooms. [Moldy/biological odors come from currently active “microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)” that are released from active colonies digesting the organic matter on which they are growing.] Classrooms: 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. ▪ There was NO noticeable odor noticed upon entering any of the classrooms. ▪ The classrooms appeared to be clean and orderly with chairs and desks in place at the time of this inspection. ▪ There was carpeting or had area rugs in 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218 at the time of this inspection. ▪ The relative humidity in the classrooms was in a range of RH=48-61%, (71-78F) average temperature (see below). ▪ There were small dehumidifiers and “Air Purifiers” running in each classroom upon arrival but were turned off by Alex prior to the sampling. Table 1 summarizes the sampling locations. Table 2 summarizes the results of the microscopic analysis of air samples from this round of sampling. The EMLab P&K mold report is found in Attachment B. Attachment C describes the properties of the dominant spores and structures found. Table 1 – Mold Spore Sampling Locations (Bold sample numbers indicate disturbed air samples) Sample # Location Comments 980-43 Room 032 disturbed (T=63, RH=46%) 980-44 Room 154 disturbed (T=68, RH=35%) 980-45 Room 160 disturbed (T=69, RH=25%) 980-46 Room 165 disturbed (T=73, RH=23%) 980-47 Room 167 disturbed (T=73, RH=29%) 980-48 Room 218 disturbed (T=70, RH=27%) DISCUSSION: MOLD - There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples: There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples along with the visual observations: o CONTAMINATION -The terms Condition 2 and 3 used describe mold contamination are part of the December 2015 Institute for Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC), ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation.” Condition 2 involves evidence of “settled spores or fungal fragments dispersed from a MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 4 Condition 3 contaminated area,” a condition documented to some extent by “disturbed” air samples. Condition 3 refers to “actual mold growth, associated spores and fungal fragment … active or dormant, visible or hidden.” o OUTDOOR SPORES - While ALL molds ultimately originate in nature, outdoors, there are some molds that are referred to as “outdoor fungi.” This term means that that they are found primarily outdoors because they depend on plants, other fungi, or animals to complete their life cycle. Others need a complex ecosystem to complete their life cycle. These outdoor spores may be found indoors because they were transported there but hardly ever develop colonies indoors. These include the ascospores, basidiospores (some coming from mushrooms that develop in the wild) and rusts. When found indoors these “outdoor” spores indicate the space has been experienced air exchange with the outdoors, not growth in response to moist conditions. o INDOOR SPORES - There are some molds that have adapted to a variety of food sources - organic debris, processed wood (i.e., cellulose, paper, etc.) and more - that are commonly found indoors - loosely referred to as “indoor spores,” even though they initially came in from outdoors. With the proper level of damp to wet conditions some of them amplify/grow indoors and serve as moisture/leak indicators. In our area of southern New England, NES has found that the primary moisture/leak-indicators are the Aspergillus and Penicillium molds (referred to as “Asp/Pen-like” when their spores are counted under a microscope since their spores are indistinguishable). Less often NES has found that Cladosporium, the most abundant spore type found in U.S. outdoor air samples, can also amplify under moist conditions indoors and may serve as a secondary moisture/leak indicator. o STANDARDS - Many people look for standards to compare mold readings to with the desire to define a healthy or unhealthy space. Obviously very high spore readings found by counting spores/structures in a collected sample under a microscope (S/m3 - spores/structures per cubic meter sampled) or colony readings found by counting the colonies that develop/grow on a nutrient media after sampled air has impacted that nutrient media (CFU/m3 - colony forming basements per cubic meter) are undesirable. Because of the wide range of human sensitivities or allergic reactions to the irritants in/on mold spores AND the limited scientific research linking spore levels to various immune system reaction, no scientifically-based “standards” have yet been developed by medical or governmental agencies. [One medical commentary was issued in May 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) in its report on “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health,” in which they state, “there are no generally accepted health-based standards for acceptable concentrations of fungal (mold) spores, hyphae or metabolites in the air.” However, there is informal guidance from industrial hygienists and some allergists to try to keep indoor spore levels below 1,000 S/m 3 in order to minimize the irritation for the general population. Some have suggested that a “healthy” level be considered at 500 CFU/m3 or 500 S/m3. NES uses 1,000 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores as its informal guideline for the general population (see explanatory note at www.NausetEnvironmental.com) and 500 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores for sensitized individuals. Sensitized or allergic individuals may well be irritated and react at levels well below that guideline level. More information can be found on mold and health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website - http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm.] MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 5 o DEBRIS RATING - This column in the Attachment B data report for the Cyclex-D spore trap results is an evaluation of the “non-biological debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist.” As more non-biological debris is plated on the impact area during the sampling, it coats and covers spores laid down earlier so that the microscopist cannot see/count the spores. Hence, higher debris ratings indicate difficulty in determining the number/type of spores collected on the sticky surface of the impact area. In addition, the more debris, the greater the chance that a spore would miss a sticky area and NOT even be collected. Hence, higher debris ratings lead to under counting of spores actually in the air. The Debris Rating for each sample is given next to the sample number in Table 2 as DR-#. AIR SAMPLING FINDINGS Looking at the data from Attachment B extracted into Table 2, one sees that: • In rooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218 the worst-case, disturbed samples found Asp-Pen- like spores were below NES’s informal guidance for the general public indicating – 1,000 S/m3. As seen in Table 2, the range of Asp-Pen-like spores detected was from NONE in Room 032 to a high of only 380 S/m3, in Room 160. There is NO need for professional remediation in these rooms (see below). In the samples, the DEBRIS RATING of “1+” from 5 of the 6 samples means there is minimal non- microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. The “3+” means that 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 6 Table 2 – Airborne Spore Levels (see Attachment B) (Disturbed sample numbers and results are indicated by bold type. Concentrations are expressed as spores/structures per cubic meter, S/m3.) (Acceptable and elevated readings compared to NES’s informal guideline are indicated.) Sample # Total Breakdown of dominant species (~80%) Room 032 980-43 [DR 1+] 560 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%Asp-Pen like (NONE) – 0%, basidiospores (360) – 65%, Cladosporium (160) – 29%, Room 154 980-44[DR 1+] 900 Ascospores (20) – 2%, Asp-Pen like (120) – 13%, basidiospores (460) – 51%, Cladosporium (280) – 31%, Room 160 980-45[DR 1+] 890 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (380) – 43%, basidiospores (320) – 36%, Cladosporium (180) –20%, Room 165 980-46 [DR 3+] 610 Ascospores (20) – 3%Asp-Pen like (100) – 16%, basidiospores (360) – 59%, Cladosporium (120) – 20%, Room 167 980-47[DR 1+] 550 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (120) – 22%, basidiospores (280) – 51%, Cladosporium (140) – 25%, Room 218 980-48[DR 1+] 1000 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (160) – 16%, basidiospores (460) – 45%, Cladosporium (400) – 39%, NOTE: “Asp-Pen like” refers to Aspergillus and Penicillium spores that are indistinguishable under the light microscope. The symbol “<1%” is read as “less than 1%.” DR = Debris rating (see above) SUMMARY: AIR SAMPLING: The hypothesis testing by air sampling REFUTED hypothesis A for the spore samples in these classrooms meaning conditions there are ACCEPTABLE spore levels in rooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in the classrooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is NO need for professional remediation. MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 7 To avoid problems with mold in the future, be attentive to any and all water intrusion or condensation issues, taking general advice from The Mold Survival Guide for Your Classrooms and for Your Health by Jeff and Connie May (2004). In particular: ▪ Respond quickly to correct any leaks that may develop or become evident. ▪ If there are allergic or sensitized individuals attending or teaching at the school, use a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum for routine cleaning of flooring and upholstery (at least quarterly) to capture spores and irritants. ▪ Operate an Energy Star-rated dehumidifier on the classroom floors, especially during summer recess with adequate separation from solid objects and in conjunction with a small bilge pump in the collection bucket or a condensate pump outside the basement that discharges the collected water to a suitable drain. The goal is to lower the humidity below 60%, so a modest dry setting is usually sufficient. Periodically clean the basement’s filter following the manufacturer’s instructions. == == == == == == == == == The above discussion and recommendations are related to background information provided and the conditions visually observable at the time of NES’s site visit on 11 October along with the results of sampling activities and are thus limited to these activities and timeframe. Future events and changes in the condition and operation of the school may well alter the conditions for biological activity/growth, especially moisture. Such changes will alter the relative significance of these suggestions and the effectiveness of their implementation. Thus, the impact of such changes and cannot be considered part of the scope of this report/work. We trust the above information is sufficient for your current needs. Please call us with any questions or to clarify points. Very truly yours, William M. Vaughan, PhD, QEP, CIEC President, Senior Scientist QEP=Qualified Environmental Professional (since 1994) CIEC=Council-certified Indoor Environment Consultant (#0608017) Alexander D MacLellan`````` Senior Field Tech, CRMI CRMI=Certified residential mold inspector (#0604036) C:\Users\Bill\Documents\BV Files - Dell-HP4\IAQ\980G Stony Brook School 3 Rm Sample BV.RPT.docx Attachment A Photographs Taken During the Inspection & Sampling Stony Brook Elementary School Room 032 Room 154 Room 160 Room 165 Room 167 Room 218 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Room 032 Sample #980-43 Room 154 Sample # 980-44 Room 160 Sample # 980-45 Room 165 Sample # 980-46 Room 167 Sample # 980-47 Room 218 Sample # 980-48 ATTACHMENT B Laboratory results from EMLab P&K, LLC The “Debris Rating” column in the data report is an evaluation of the “non-microbial debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist. Here is a summary of the meaning/significance of those codes. Non- Microbial Particulate Debris Rating Description Interpretation 0 No particles detected in impaction line area. No particulates on slide in impaction line area. The absence of particulates could indicate improper sampling or a blank sample, as most air samples typically contain some particulates 1 Minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. 2 Up to 25% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. 3 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. 4 76% to 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates 5 Greater than 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Sample could not be read due to excessive debris. Reported concentrations are estimations calculated from the number of spores observed on the perimeter of debris. The sample should be collected at shorter time interval, or other measures taken to reduce the collection of non-microbial debris. The Limit of Detection is the product of a raw count of 1 and 100 divided by the percent read. The analytical sensitivity (counts/m3) is the product of the Limit of Detection and 1000 divided by the sample volume. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data. § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision . Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC 3000 Lincoln Drive East, Suite A, Marlton, NJ 08053 (866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: NAUSET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C/O: Mr. Alexander MacLellan Re: 980 G Stony Brook; PRV Date of Submittal: 10-11-2022 Date of Receipt: 10-13-2022 Date of Report: 10-17-2022 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Lab ID-Version‡ Location Air vol. (L) Background Debris Counts of Fungal Structures Fungal Structures/m3 Presumptive Fungal ID (raw counts*) Percentage 14743094-1 10/17/2022 980-43 Room 032 Disturbed 200 1+ 1 72 32 1 5 5 360 160 5 25 § Total: 560 Alternaria (1) Basidiospores (18) Cladosporium (8) Pithomyces (1) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (5) 1 65 29 1 5 Comments: 14743095-1 10/17/2022 980-44 Room 154 Disturbed 200 1+ 1 4 92 56 1 24 2 5 20 460 280 5 120 10 § Total: 900 Alternaria (1) Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (23) Cladosporium (14) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (6) Pithomyces (2) 1 2 51 31 1 13 1 Comments: 14743096-1 10/17/2022 980-45 Room 160 Disturbed 200 1+ 1 64 36 76 5 320 180 380 § Total: 890 Alternaria (1) Basidiospores (16) Cladosporium (9) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (19) 1 36 20 43 Comments: 14743097-1 10/17/2022 980-46 Room 165 Disturbed 200 3+ 4 72 24 20 2 20 360 120 100 10 § Total: 610 Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (18) Cladosporium (6) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (5) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (2) 3 59 20 16 2 Comments: 14743098-1 10/17/2022 980-47 Room 167 Disturbed 200 1+ 56 28 24 1 1 2 280 140 120 5 5 § Total: 550 10 Basidiospores (14) Cladosporium (7) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (6) Pithomyces (1) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (1) Hyphal fragments (2) 51 25 22 1 1 N/A Comments: 14743099-1 10/17/2022 980-48 Room 218 Disturbed 200 1+ 92 80 32 1 460 400 160 § Total: 1,000 5 Basidiospores (23) Cladosporium (20) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (8) Pollen (1) 45 39 16 N/A Comments: Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m3 divided by the raw count. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity mu ltiplied by the sample volume divided by 1000. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. number is . Attachment C Ecology and Pathology of Species Reported Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 1 NOTE: Characteristics of the major species found at levels above 10% and listed above have been collected from the University of Minnesota, Dr. Fungus and EMLab P&K, LLC websites. ascospores ECOLOGY - A general category of spores that have been produced by means of sexual reproduction. Many ascospores can germinate and later produce asexual spores (conidia). To further complicate matters, some asexual fungi can also become sexual under specific conditions, these are considered ascomycetes. PATHOLOGY - This generalized group contains potential opportunistic pathogens and toxin producers. They are suspected allergens, though not yet proven. Aspergillus species ECOLOGY – Spores from this genus are commonly found in outdoor air, but less frequently than Cladosporium, Penicillium, Basidomycetes or yeasts. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Penicillium spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY – Of the more than 150 species and varieties of Aspergillus, some are known to cause diseases in animals and humans. Several species are commonly isolated in schools. Many Asp. Species can produce mycotoxins depending on the substrate on which they are growing. Antigens of Asp. species are available commercially. basidiospores ECOLOGY - Sexual spores from a variety of molds that do not thrive in the indoor environment. PATHOLOGY - Some basidiospores have been shown to cause allergies and asthma. Cladosporium sp. ECOLOGY - They are the most commonly identified outdoor fungus (48-60 species). The most common ones include Cladosporium elatum, Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and Cladosporium cladosporioides. C. herbarum is the most frequently found species in outdoor air in temperate climates. Since it is a “dry” spore formed in very fragile chains, it is easily dispersed, hence often found in air samples. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. While often found indoors their numbers are less than outdoor numbers, implying that the outdoor environment is the source of these spores. Indoor Cladosporium sp. are commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts, on windows with occasional condensation and on wall surfaces in high humidity conditions or occasional condensation. A wide variety of plants serve as food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint, and textiles. They are common in soils, dead organic matter, and the air. These fungi can decompose cellulose and are considered Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 2 “ubiquitous.” PATHOLOGY - The ability to sporulate heavily, ease of dispersal, and buoyant spores makes this fungus the most important fungal airway allergen; causes asthma and hay fever in the Western hemisphere. They are a rare human pathogen. They can cause mycosis and produce greater than 10 antigens (initiators of allergic response) available commercially. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: Type I allergen), Type III hypersensitivity pneumonitis: hot tub lung, moldy wall hypersensitivity, etc. Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Penicillium sp. ECOLOGY - A wide number of organisms have placed in this genus and they are well studied because of their value as producers of antibiotics. Identification to species, among the 200 or so identified to date, is difficult and expensive. They are often found in aerosol and soil samples. They are a ubiquitous saprophyte (meaning they live on dead or decaying organic matter) and “are found everywhere.” They are commonly found in temperate regions in soil, food, cellulose, and grains as well as on living vegetation. They are also found in paint and compost piles and soils. They are commonly found in water-damaged dry wall, damp latex paint, carpet, wallpaper, and on interior fiberglass duct insulation. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Aspergillus spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY - They may cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis and/or allergic alveolitis in susceptible individuals. They are reported to be allergenic (skin). Some species can produce mycotoxins. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: type I). Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Can cause allergic reactions to sensitized people and are associated with mycotic keratosis in humans. Molds - www.epa.gov/iaq/molds [provides link to mold resources] School Sciences - http://www.schoolscience.com/resources/more-topics/mold/ Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. an Air Quality Company P.O. Box 1385 508/247-9167 [800/931-1151] East Orleans, MA 02643 FAX: 508/255-0738 12 October 2022 NES Job #980F Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Dave Caolo Stony Brook Elementary School 384 Underpass Road Brewster, MA 02631 Re: Post-remediation verification (PRV) inspection & sampling in 3 classrooms at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary (Brewster) Dear Mr. Caolo: Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. (NES) is pleased to submit this letter report on a mold/moisture inspection with sampling for three classrooms at 384 Underpass Road. Following ongoing authorization, NES sent Alexander MacLellan, CRMI back to the school on 7 October 2022. This report is CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary and can only be distributed by or with the approval of the Clients to whom it is addressed. BACKGROUND: NES was retained to carry out a sampling to document current mold/moisture conditions in classrooms following remediation, 039, 037 and 030. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: There was NO strong odors noted upon entering classrooms 039, 037 and 030. The relative humidity was now acceptable between RH=48-61%, (71-78F) average temperature in the three classrooms at the time of this inspection. The hypothesis-based, PRV air sampling revealed that the Aspergillus/Penicillium-like spore readings in ALL three classrooms (039, 037 and 030) were BELOW NES’s informal guideline for the general public (1,000 S/m3), hence indicating a successful remediation effort. There is NO need for further remediation in classrooms 039, 037 and 030. ON SITE ACTIVITIES – Alex MacLellan arrived at 384 Underpass Road Stony Brook Elementary on 8 October at about 9:45 am. Alex directed himself to the rooms of concern. During this inspection, Alex MacLellan used a calibrated Extech Hygro-Thermometer Pen (Model 445580) to measure temperature and relative humidity that is periodically calibrated to two known humidities. AIR SAMPLING - HYPOTHESIS TESTING Alex MacLellan with the guidance of Dr. Vaughan determined that an air sampling strategy was needed to address possible potential mold spore contamination in the three classrooms. The sampling concern was to address the following hypothesis regarding possible environmental issues: PRV MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Page 2 Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classrooms, 039, 037 and 030, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. The airborne mold spore samples were taken in worst case (fan-disturbed) conditions in the classrooms. The disturbed samples were taken after blowing the surfaces in the area. The air samples were collected on a Cyclex-d™ cassette for microscopic analysis. [The expiration date for the Cyclex-d™ cassettes used was July 2023.] After the sampling flow rate was confirmed for the pumps at 20 lpm using a rotameter transfer standard (traceable to NIST via a BIOS DryCal calibrator), the interior air samples were taken for a timed ten-minute interval using a digital timer. A log sheet documented the activity and conditions during the sampling. No outdoor reference sample was taken since the focus was on indoor conditions. The “disturbed” samples were taken after disturbing the surfaces in the area using a 12” fan set on high speed for a couple of minutes. The drafts from the fan also suspend the mold spores and irritants from hard-to-reach areas where they have settled but would be dislodged by infrequent servicing activities as well as spores from latent (not yet visible) mold growth. The disturbed air sampling began following at least a 3-5-minute calm period that allowed larger particles/debris to settle out of the air and minimize interference/obscurance on the collecting surface in the cassette. The sampling location is found in Table 1. The exposed and labeled air sample cassettes were combined with a completed chain of custody form and shipped to EMLab P&K, LLC. (Marlton, NJ). The air sample was designated for “Fungi - Spore Trap Analysis.” The following perspective indicates why EMLab P&K, LLC was selected: ▪ “Because there is currently no governmental certification for environmental microbiology laboratories (except for drinking water and wastewater microbiology), EMLab P&K, LLC is an active participant in the EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing) program sponsored by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). P&K has been formally accredited by the AIHA in Environmental Microbiology since September 1300 with a laboratory identification number of 103005.” ▪ EMLab P&K is one the largest commercial analytical laboratories and is unique in that all of their analytical employees are degreed analysts, the majority with Masters or Ph.D.'s in mycology, microbiology or a related field. ▪ “EMLab P&K has modeled its quality control system after the ISO guidelines, one of the most stringent sets of international standards in the industry, to ensure that its customers receive the high standard of accuracy, reliability and impartiality that they have come to expect from a leader in the environmental industry.” OBSERVATIONS: Observations at Stony Brook Elementary in the three classrooms during the 7 October site visit are provided below. [Directions left-right and front-back refer to viewing the school from the parking lot.] PRV MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Page 3 General ▪ The weather was sunny and breezy with a temperature of 75F. ▪ There was NO strong odor noted on entering the school or the classrooms. [Moldy/biological odors come from currently active “microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)” that are released from active colonies digesting the organic matter on which they are growing.] Classrooms: 039, 037 and 030. ▪ There was NO strong odor noticed upon entering any of the classrooms. ▪ The classrooms appeared to be clean and orderly with chairs and desks in place at the time of this inspection. ▪ There were area rugs in 039, 037 and 030 at the time of this inspection. ▪ The relative humidity in the classrooms was in a range of RH=48-61%, (71-78F) average temperature (see below). ▪ There were small dehumidifiers and “Air Purifiers” running in each classroom upon arrival but were turned off by Alex prior to the sampling. Table 1 summarizes the sampling locations. Table 2 summarizes the results of the microscopic analysis of air samples from this round of sampling. The EMLab P&K mold report is found in Attachment B. Attachment C describes the properties of the dominant spores and structures found. Table 1 – Mold Spore Sampling Locations (Bold sample numbers indicate disturbed air samples) Sample # Location Comments 980-40 Room 039 disturbed (T=71, RH=48%) 980-41 Room 037 disturbed (T=78, RH=51%) 980-42 Room 030 disturbed (T=72, RH=61%) DISCUSSION: MOLD - There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples: There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples along with the visual observations: o CONTAMINATION -The terms Condition 2 and 3 used describe mold contamination are part of the December 2015 Institute for Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC), ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation.” Condition 2 involves evidence of “settled spores or fungal fragments dispersed from a Condition 3 contaminated area,” a condition documented to some extent by “disturbed” air samples. Condition 3 refers to “actual mold growth, associated spores and fungal fragment … active or dormant, visible or hidden.” o OUTDOOR SPORES - While ALL molds ultimately originate in nature, outdoors, there are some molds that are referred to as “outdoor fungi.” This term means that that they are PRV MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Page 4 found primarily outdoors because they depend on plants, other fungi or animals to complete their life cycle. Others need a complex ecosystem to complete their life cycle. These outdoor spores may be found indoors because they were transported there but hardly ever develop colonies indoors. These include the ascospores, basidiospores (some coming from mushrooms that develop in the wild) and rusts. When found indoors these “outdoor” spores indicate the space has been experienced air exchange with the outdoors, not growth in response to moist conditions. o INDOOR SPORES - There are some molds that have adapted to a variety of food sources - organic debris, processed wood (i.e., cellulose, paper, etc.) and more - that are commonly found indoors - loosely referred to as “indoor spores,” even though they initially came in from outdoors. With the proper level of damp to wet conditions some of them amplify/grow indoors and serve as moisture/leak indicators. In our area of southern New England, NES has found that the primary moisture/leak-indicators are the Aspergillus and Penicillium molds (referred to as “Asp/Pen-like” when their spores are counted under a microscope since their spores are indistinguishable). Less often NES has found that Cladosporium, the most abundant spore type found in U.S. outdoor air samples, can also amplify under moist conditions indoors and may serve as a secondary moisture/leak indicator. o STANDARDS - Many people look for standards to compare mold readings to with the desire to define a healthy or unhealthy space. Obviously very high spore readings found by counting spores/structures in a collected sample under a microscope (S/m3 - spores/structures per cubic meter sampled) or colony readings found by counting the colonies that develop/grow on a nutrient media after sampled air has impacted that nutrient media (CFU/m3 - colony forming basements per cubic meter) are undesirable. Because of the wide range of human sensitivities or allergic reactions to the irritants in/on mold spores AND the limited scientific research linking spore levels to various immune system reaction, no scientifically-based “standards” have yet been developed by medical or governmental agencies. [One medical commentary was issued in May 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) in its report on “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health,” in which they state, “there are no generally accepted health-based standards for acceptable concentrations of fungal (mold) spores, hyphae or metabolites in the air.” However, there is informal guidance from industrial hygienists and some allergists to try to keep indoor spore levels below 1,000 S/m3 in order to minimize the irritation for the general population. Some have suggested that a “healthy” level be considered at 500 CFU/m3 or 500 S/m3. NES uses 1,000 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores as its informal guideline for the general population (see explanatory note at www.NausetEnvironmental.com) and 500 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores for sensitized individuals. Sensitized or allergic individuals may well be irritated and react at levels well below that guideline level. More information can be found on mold and health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website - http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm.] o DEBRIS RATING - This column in the Attachment B data report for the Cyclex-D spore trap results is an evaluation of the “non-biological debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist.” As more non-biological debris is plated on the impact area during the sampling, it coats and covers spores laid down earlier so that the microscopist cannot see/count the spores. Hence, higher debris ratings indicate difficulty in determining the PRV MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Page 5 number/type of spores collected on the sticky surface of the impact area. In addition, the more debris, the greater the chance that a spore would miss a sticky area and NOT even be collected. Hence, higher debris ratings lead to under counting of spores actually in the air. The Debris Rating for each sample is given next to the sample number in Table 2 as DR-#. AIR SAMPLING FINDINGS Looking at the data from Attachment B extracted into Table 2, one sees that: • In rooms 039, 037 and 030 the disturbed samples found Asp-Pen-like spores were below NES’s informal guidance for the general public indicating NO need for further professional remediation (see below). Table 2 – Airborne Spore Levels (see Attachment B) (Disturbed sample numbers and results are indicated by bold type. Concentrations are expressed as spores/structures per cubic meter, S/m3.) (Acceptable and elevated readings compared to NES’s informal guideline are indicated.) Sample # Total Breakdown of dominant species (~80%) Room 039 980-40 [DR 3+] 560 Ascospores (12) – 2%Asp-Pen like (170) – 37%, basidiospores (210) – 37%, Cladosporium (100) – 19%, Room 037 980-41[DR 2+] 440 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (120) – 26%, basidiospores (290) – 66%, Cladosporium (12) – 3%, Room 030 980-42[DR 2+] 700 Ascospores (12) – 2%, Asp-Pen like (160) – 23%, basidiospores (400) – 57%, Cladosporium (70) – 10%, NOTE: “Asp-Pen like” refers to Aspergillus and Penicillium spores that are indistinguishable under the light microscope. The symbol “<1%” is read as “less than 1%.” DR = Debris rating (see above) In the samples the DEBRIS RATING of “2+” and 3+. means that 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. SUMMARY: AIR SAMPLING: The hypothesis testing by air sampling REFUTED hypothesis A for the spore samples in the classrooms 039, 037, 030, meaning conditions there are ACCEPTABLE spore levels in rooms 039, 037 and 030. PRV MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Page 6 Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in the classrooms 039, 037 and 030, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is NO need for further professional remediation. To avoid problems with mold in the future, be attentive to any and all water intrusion or condensation issues, taking general advice from The Mold Survival Guide for Your Classrooms and for Your Health by Jeff and Connie May (2004). In particular: ▪ Respond quickly to correct any leaks that may develop or become evident. ▪ If there are allergic or sensitized individuals attending or teaching at the school, use a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum for routine cleaning of flooring and upholstery (at least quarterly) to capture spores and irritants. ▪ Operate an Energy Star-rated dehumidifier on the classroom floor during summer recess with adequate separation from solid objects and in conjunction with a small bilge pump in the collection bucket or a condensate pump outside the basement that discharges the collected water to a suitable drain. The goal is to lower the humidity below 60%, so a modest dry setting is usually sufficient. Periodically clean the basement’s filter following the manufacturer’s instructions. PRV MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2680 Page 7 == == == == == == == == == The above discussion and recommendations are related to background information provided and the conditions visually observable at the time of NES’s site visit on 7 October along with the results of sampling activities and are thus limited to these activities and timeframe. Future events and changes in the condition and operation of the school may well alter the conditions for biological activity/growth, especially moisture. Such changes will alter the relative significance of these suggestions and the effectiveness of their implementation. Thus, the impact of such changes and cannot be considered part of the scope of this report/work. We trust the above information is sufficient for your current needs. Please call us with any questions or to clarify points. Very truly yours, William M. Vaughan, PhD, QEP, CIEC President, Senior Scientist QEP=Qualified Environmental Professional (since 1994) CIEC=Council-certified Indoor Environment Consultant (#0608017) Alexander D MacLellan`````` Senior Field Tech, CRMI CRMI=Certified residential mold inspector (#0604036) C:\Users\Bill\Documents\BV Files - Dell-HP4\IAQ\980F Stony Brook School 3 Rm Sample BV.RPT.docx Attachment A Photographs Taken During the Inspection & Sampling Stony Brook Elementary School SAMPLING LOCATIONS ATTACHMENT B Laboratory results from EMLab P&K, LLC The “Debris Rating” column in the data report is an evaluation of the “non-microbial debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist. Here is a summary of the meaning/significance of those codes. Non- Microbial Particulate Debris Rating Description Interpretation 0 No particles detected in impaction line area. No particulates on slide in impaction line area. The absence of particulates could indicate improper sampling or a blank sample, as most air samples typically contain some particulates 1 Minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. 2 Up to 25% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. 3 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. 4 76% to 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates 5 Greater than 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Sample could not be read due to excessive debris. Reported concentrations are estimations calculated from the number of spores observed on the perimeter of debris. The sample should be collected at shorter time interval, or other measures taken to reduce the collection of non-microbial debris. The Limit of Detection is the product of a raw count of 1 and 100 divided by the percent read. The analytical sensitivity (counts/m3) is the product of the Limit of Detection and 1000 divided by the sample volume. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data. § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision . Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC 4460 Brookfield Corporate Drive, Suite A, Chantilly, VA 20151 (866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: NAUSET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C/O: Mr. Alexander MacLellan Re: 980F Stony Brook; PRV Date of Receipt: 10-10-2022 Date of Report: 10-12-2022 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Lab ID-Version‡ Location Air vol. (L) Background Debris Counts of Fungal Structures Fungal Structures/m3 Presumptive Fungal ID (raw counts*) Percentage 14720520-1 10/12/2022 980-40 Room 039 Disturbed 200 3+ 1 2 42 2 21 1 1 35 1 2 2 2 6 2 5 12 210 10 100 5 5 170 5 10 10 10 § Total: 560 30 10 Alternaria (1) Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (18) Bispora (2) Cladosporium (9) Epicoccum (1) Other brown (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (15) Pestalotiopsis (1) Pithomyces (2) Rusts (2) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (2) Hyphal fragments (6) Pollen (2) 1 2 37 2 19 1 1 31 1 2 2 2 N/A N/A Comments 14720521-1 10/12/2022 980-4 Room 037 Disturbed 200 2+ 58 2 1 1 23 3 3 1 290 12 5 5 120 15 § Total: 440 15 5 Basidiospores (25) Cladosporium (1) Curvularia (1) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (10) Pithomyces (3) Hyphal fragments (3) Pollen (1) 66 3 1 1 26 3 N/A N/A Comments 14720522-1 10/12/202 980-42 Room 030 Disturbed 200 2+ 2 79 14 8 1 33 1 2 2 12 400 70 40 5 160 5 10 § Total: 700 10 Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (34) Cladosporium (6) Epicoccum (8) Other brown (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (14) Pithomyces (1) Rusts (2) Hyphal fragments (2) 2 57 10 6 1 23 1 1 N/A Comments: Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m3 divided by the raw count. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity multiplied by the sample volume divided by 1000. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. number is . Attachment C Ecology and Pathology of Species Reported Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 1 NOTE: Characteristics of the major species found at levels above 10% and listed above have been collected from the University of Minnesota, Dr. Fungus and EMLab P&K, LLC websites. ascospores ECOLOGY - A general category of spores that have been produced by means of sexual reproduction. Many ascospores can germinate and later produce asexual spores (conidia). To further complicate matters, some asexual fungi can also become sexual under specific conditions, these are considered ascomycetes. PATHOLOGY - This generalized group contains potential opportunistic pathogens and toxin producers. They are suspected allergens, though not yet proven. Aspergillus species ECOLOGY – Spores from this genus are commonly found in outdoor air, but less frequently than Cladosporium, Penicillium, Basidomycetes or yeasts. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Penicillium spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY – Of the more than 150 species and varieties of Aspergillus, some are known to cause diseases in animals and humans. Several species are commonly isolated in schools. Many Asp. Species can produce mycotoxins depending on the substrate on which they are growing. Antigens of Asp. species are available commercially. basidiospores ECOLOGY - Sexual spores from a variety of molds that do not thrive in the indoor environment. PATHOLOGY - Some basidiospores have been shown to cause allergies and asthma. Cladosporium sp. ECOLOGY - They are the most commonly identified outdoor fungus (48-60 species). The most common ones include Cladosporium elatum, Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and Cladosporium cladosporioides. C. herbarum is the most frequently found species in outdoor air in temperate climates. Since it is a “dry” spore formed in very fragile chains, it is easily dispersed, hence often found in air samples. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. While often found indoors their numbers are less than outdoor numbers, implying that the outdoor environment is the source of these spores. Indoor Cladosporium sp. are commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts, on windows with occasional condensation and on wall surfaces in high humidity conditions or occasional condensation. A wide variety of plants serve as food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint and textiles. They are common in soils, dead organic matter and the air. These fungi can decompose cellulose and are considered Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 2 “ubiquitous.” PATHOLOGY - The ability to sporulate heavily, ease of dispersal, and buoyant spores makes this fungus the most important fungal airway allergen; causes asthma and hay fever in the Western hemisphere. They are a rare human pathogen. They can cause mycosis and produce greater than 10 antigens (initiators of allergic response) available commercially. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: Type I allergen), Type III hypersensitivity pneumonitis: hot tub lung, moldy wall hypersensitivity, etc. Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Penicillium sp. ECOLOGY - A wide number of organisms have placed in this genus and they are well studied because of their value as producers of antibiotics. Identification to species, among the 200 or so identified to date, is difficult and expensive. They are often found in aerosol and soil samples. They are a ubiquitous saprophyte (meaning they live on dead or decaying organic matter) and “are found everywhere.” They are commonly found in temperate regions in soil, food, cellulose and grains as well as on living vegetation. They are also found in paint and compost piles and soils. They are commonly found in water-damaged dry wall, damp latex paint, carpet, wallpaper, and on interior fiberglass duct insulation. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Aspergillus spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY - They may cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis and/or allergic alveolitis in susceptible individuals. They are reported to be allergenic (skin). Some species can produce mycotoxins. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: type I). Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Can cause allergic reactions to sensitized people and are associated with mycotic keratosis in humans. Molds - www.epa.gov/iaq/molds [provides link to mold resources] School Sciences - http://www.schoolscience.com/resources/more-topics/mold/ Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. an Air Quality Company P.O. Box 1385 508/247-9167 [800/931-1151] East Orleans, MA 02643 FAX: 508/255-0738 19 October 2022 NES Job #980G Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Dave Caolo Stony Brook Elementary School 384 Underpass Road Brewster, MA 02631 Re: Baseline mold/moisture inspection & sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary (Brewster) Dear Mr. Caolo: Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. (NES) is pleased to submit this letter report on a mold/moisture inspection with sampling for six classrooms at 384 Underpass Road. Following ongoing authorization, NES sent Alexander MacLellan, CRMI back to the school on 11 October 2022. This report is CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary and can only be distributed by or with the approval of the Clients to whom it is addressed. BACKGROUND: NES was retained to carry out mold spore sampling to document current mold/moisture conditions in six classrooms - 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: There was NO strong odors noted upon entering classrooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. The relative humidity was acceptably dry, between RH=23-46%, (63-73F) average temperature in the six classrooms at the time of this inspection. The hypothesis-based, air sampling revealed that the Aspergillus/Penicillium-like spore readings in ALL six classrooms(032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218) were BELOW NES’s informal guideline for the general public (1,000 S/m3), hence indicating a successful remediation effort. There is NO need for remediation in classrooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. ON SITE ACTIVITIES – Alex MacLellan arrived at 384 Underpass Road Stony Brook Elementary on 11 October at about 9:45 am. Alex directed himself to the rooms of concern. During this inspection, Alex MacLellan used a calibrated Extech Hygro-Thermometer Pen (Model 445580) to measure temperature and relative humidity that is periodically calibrated to two known humidities. AIR SAMPLING - HYPOTHESIS TESTING Alex MacLellan with the guidance of Dr. Vaughan determined that an air sampling strategy was needed to address possible potential mold spore contamination in the three classrooms. The sampling concern was to address the following hypothesis regarding possible environmental issues: MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 2 Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classrooms, 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. The airborne mold spore samples were taken in worst case (fan-disturbed) conditions in the classrooms. The disturbed samples were taken after blowing the surfaces in the area. The air samples were collected on a Cyclex-d™ cassette for microscopic analysis. [The expiration date for the Cyclex-d™ cassettes used was July 2023.] After the sampling flow rate was confirmed for the pumps at 20 lpm using a rotameter transfer standard (traceable to NIST via a BIOS DryCal calibrator), the interior air samples were taken for a timed ten-minute interval using a digital timer. A log sheet documented the activity and conditions during the sampling. No outdoor reference sample was taken since the focus was on indoor conditions. The “disturbed,” worst-case samples were taken after disturbing the surfaces in the area using a 12” fan set on high speed for a couple of minutes. The drafts from the fan also suspend the mold spores and irritants from hard-to-reach areas where they have settled but would be dislodged by infrequent servicing activities as well as spores from latent (not yet visible) mold growth . The disturbed air sampling began following at least a 3-5-minute calm period that allowed larger particles/debris to settle out of the air and minimize interference/obscurance on the collecting surface in the cassette. The sampling location is found in Table 1. The exposed and labeled air sample cassettes were combined with a completed chain of custody form and shipped to EMLab P&K, LLC. (Marlton, NJ). The air sample was designated for “Fungi - Spore Trap Analysis.” The following perspective indicates why EMLab P&K, LLC was selected: ▪ “Because there is currently no governmental certification for environmental microbiology laboratories (except for drinking water and wastewater microbiology), EMLab P&K, LLC is an active participant in the EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing) program sponsored by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). P&K has been formally accredited by the AIHA in Environmental Microbiology since September 1300 with a laboratory identification number of 103005.” ▪ EMLab P&K is one the largest commercial analytical laboratories and is unique in that all of their analytical employees are degreed analysts, the majority with Masters or Ph.D.'s in mycology, microbiology, or a related field. ▪ “EMLab P&K has modeled its quality control system after the ISO guidelines, one of the most stringent sets of international standards in the industry, to ensure that its customers receive the high standard of accuracy, reliability and impartiality that they have come to expect from a leader in the environmental industry.” OBSERVATIONS: Observations at Stony Brook Elementary in the six classrooms during the 11 October site visit are provided below. [Directions left-right and front-back refer to viewing the school from the parking lot.] MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 3 General ▪ The weather was sunny and breezy with a temperature of 54F. ▪ There was NO noticeable odor noted on entering the school or these classrooms. [Moldy/biological odors come from currently active “microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)” that are released from active colonies digesting the organic matter on which they are growing.] Classrooms: 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. ▪ There was NO noticeable odor noticed upon entering any of the classrooms. ▪ The classrooms appeared to be clean and orderly with chairs and desks in place at the time of this inspection. ▪ There was carpeting or had area rugs in 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218 at the time of this inspection. ▪ The relative humidity in the classrooms was in a range of RH=48-61%, (71-78F) average temperature (see below). ▪ There were small dehumidifiers and “Air Purifiers” running in each classroom upon arrival but were turned off by Alex prior to the sampling. Table 1 summarizes the sampling locations. Table 2 summarizes the results of the microscopic analysis of air samples from this round of sampling. The EMLab P&K mold report is found in Attachment B. Attachment C describes the properties of the dominant spores and structures found. Table 1 – Mold Spore Sampling Locations (Bold sample numbers indicate disturbed air samples) Sample # Location Comments 980-43 Room 032 disturbed (T=63, RH=46%) 980-44 Room 154 disturbed (T=68, RH=35%) 980-45 Room 160 disturbed (T=69, RH=25%) 980-46 Room 165 disturbed (T=73, RH=23%) 980-47 Room 167 disturbed (T=73, RH=29%) 980-48 Room 218 disturbed (T=70, RH=27%) DISCUSSION: MOLD - There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples: There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples along with the visual observations: o CONTAMINATION -The terms Condition 2 and 3 used describe mold contamination are part of the December 2015 Institute for Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC), ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation.” Condition 2 involves evidence of “settled spores or fungal fragments dispersed from a MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 4 Condition 3 contaminated area,” a condition documented to some extent by “disturbed” air samples. Condition 3 refers to “actual mold growth, associated spores and fungal fragment … active or dormant, visible or hidden.” o OUTDOOR SPORES - While ALL molds ultimately originate in nature, outdoors, there are some molds that are referred to as “outdoor fungi.” This term means that that they are found primarily outdoors because they depend on plants, other fungi, or animals to complete their life cycle. Others need a complex ecosystem to complete their life cycle. These outdoor spores may be found indoors because they were transported there but hardly ever develop colonies indoors. These include the ascospores, basidiospores (some coming from mushrooms that develop in the wild) and rusts. When found indoors these “outdoor” spores indicate the space has been experienced air exchange with the outdoors, not growth in response to moist conditions. o INDOOR SPORES - There are some molds that have adapted to a variety of food sources - organic debris, processed wood (i.e., cellulose, paper, etc.) and more - that are commonly found indoors - loosely referred to as “indoor spores,” even though they initially came in from outdoors. With the proper level of damp to wet conditions some of them amplify/grow indoors and serve as moisture/leak indicators. In our area of southern New England, NES has found that the primary moisture/leak-indicators are the Aspergillus and Penicillium molds (referred to as “Asp/Pen-like” when their spores are counted under a microscope since their spores are indistinguishable). Less often NES has found that Cladosporium, the most abundant spore type found in U.S. outdoor air samples, can also amplify under moist conditions indoors and may serve as a secondary moisture/leak indicator. o STANDARDS - Many people look for standards to compare mold readings to with the desire to define a healthy or unhealthy space. Obviously very high spore readings found by counting spores/structures in a collected sample under a microscope (S/m3 - spores/structures per cubic meter sampled) or colony readings found by counting the colonies that develop/grow on a nutrient media after sampled air has impacted that nutrient media (CFU/m3 - colony forming basements per cubic meter) are undesirable. Because of the wide range of human sensitivities or allergic reactions to the irritants in/on mold spores AND the limited scientific research linking spore levels to various immune system reaction, no scientifically-based “standards” have yet been developed by medical or governmental agencies. [One medical commentary was issued in May 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) in its report on “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health,” in which they state, “there are no generally accepted health-based standards for acceptable concentrations of fungal (mold) spores, hyphae or metabolites in the air.” However, there is informal guidance from industrial hygienists and some allergists to try to keep indoor spore levels below 1,000 S/m 3 in order to minimize the irritation for the general population. Some have suggested that a “healthy” level be considered at 500 CFU/m3 or 500 S/m3. NES uses 1,000 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores as its informal guideline for the general population (see explanatory note at www.NausetEnvironmental.com) and 500 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores for sensitized individuals. Sensitized or allergic individuals may well be irritated and react at levels well below that guideline level. More information can be found on mold and health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website - http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm.] MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 5 o DEBRIS RATING - This column in the Attachment B data report for the Cyclex-D spore trap results is an evaluation of the “non-biological debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist.” As more non-biological debris is plated on the impact area during the sampling, it coats and covers spores laid down earlier so that the microscopist cannot see/count the spores. Hence, higher debris ratings indicate difficulty in determining the number/type of spores collected on the sticky surface of the impact area. In addition, the more debris, the greater the chance that a spore would miss a sticky area and NOT even be collected. Hence, higher debris ratings lead to under counting of spores actually in the air. The Debris Rating for each sample is given next to the sample number in Table 2 as DR-#. AIR SAMPLING FINDINGS Looking at the data from Attachment B extracted into Table 2, one sees that: • In rooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218 the worst-case, disturbed samples found Asp-Pen- like spores were below NES’s informal guidance for the general public indicating – 1,000 S/m3. As seen in Table 2, the range of Asp-Pen-like spores detected was from NONE in Room 032 to a high of only 380 S/m3, in Room 160. There is NO need for professional remediation in these rooms (see below). In the samples, the DEBRIS RATING of “1+” from 5 of the 6 samples means there is minimal non- microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. The “3+” means that 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 6 Table 2 – Airborne Spore Levels (see Attachment B) (Disturbed sample numbers and results are indicated by bold type. Concentrations are expressed as spores/structures per cubic meter, S/m3.) (Acceptable and elevated readings compared to NES’s informal guideline are indicated.) Sample # Total Breakdown of dominant species (~80%) Room 032 980-43 [DR 1+] 560 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%Asp-Pen like (NONE) – 0%, basidiospores (360) – 65%, Cladosporium (160) – 29%, Room 154 980-44[DR 1+] 900 Ascospores (20) – 2%, Asp-Pen like (120) – 13%, basidiospores (460) – 51%, Cladosporium (280) – 31%, Room 160 980-45[DR 1+] 890 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (380) – 43%, basidiospores (320) – 36%, Cladosporium (180) –20%, Room 165 980-46 [DR 3+] 610 Ascospores (20) – 3%Asp-Pen like (100) – 16%, basidiospores (360) – 59%, Cladosporium (120) – 20%, Room 167 980-47[DR 1+] 550 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (120) – 22%, basidiospores (280) – 51%, Cladosporium (140) – 25%, Room 218 980-48[DR 1+] 1000 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%, Asp-Pen like (160) – 16%, basidiospores (460) – 45%, Cladosporium (400) – 39%, NOTE: “Asp-Pen like” refers to Aspergillus and Penicillium spores that are indistinguishable under the light microscope. The symbol “<1%” is read as “less than 1%.” DR = Debris rating (see above) SUMMARY: AIR SAMPLING: The hypothesis testing by air sampling REFUTED hypothesis A for the spore samples in these classrooms meaning conditions there are ACCEPTABLE spore levels in rooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218. Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in the classrooms 032, 154, 160, 165, 167, 218, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is NO need for professional remediation. MMI & Sampling in 6 classrooms at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2682 Page 7 To avoid problems with mold in the future, be attentive to any and all water intrusion or condensation issues, taking general advice from The Mold Survival Guide for Your Classrooms and for Your Health by Jeff and Connie May (2004). In particular: ▪ Respond quickly to correct any leaks that may develop or become evident. ▪ If there are allergic or sensitized individuals attending or teaching at the school, use a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum for routine cleaning of flooring and upholstery (at least quarterly) to capture spores and irritants. ▪ Operate an Energy Star-rated dehumidifier on the classroom floors, especially during summer recess with adequate separation from solid objects and in conjunction with a small bilge pump in the collection bucket or a condensate pump outside the basement that discharges the collected water to a suitable drain. The goal is to lower the humidity below 60%, so a modest dry setting is usually sufficient. Periodically clean the basement’s filter following the manufacturer’s instructions. == == == == == == == == == The above discussion and recommendations are related to background information provided and the conditions visually observable at the time of NES’s site visit on 11 October along with the results of sampling activities and are thus limited to these activities and timeframe. Future events and changes in the condition and operation of the school may well alter the conditions for biological activity/growth, especially moisture. Such changes will alter the relative significance of these suggestions and the effectiveness of their implementation. Thus, the impact of such changes and cannot be considered part of the scope of this report/work. We trust the above information is sufficient for your current needs. Please call us with any questions or to clarify points. Very truly yours, William M. Vaughan, PhD, QEP, CIEC President, Senior Scientist QEP=Qualified Environmental Professional (since 1994) CIEC=Council-certified Indoor Environment Consultant (#0608017) Alexander D MacLellan`````` Senior Field Tech, CRMI CRMI=Certified residential mold inspector (#0604036) C:\Users\Bill\Documents\BV Files - Dell-HP4\IAQ\980G Stony Brook School 3 Rm Sample BV.RPT.docx Attachment A Photographs Taken During the Inspection & Sampling Stony Brook Elementary School Room 032 Room 154 Room 160 Room 165 Room 167 Room 218 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Room 032 Sample #980-43 Room 154 Sample # 980-44 Room 160 Sample # 980-45 Room 165 Sample # 980-46 Room 167 Sample # 980-47 Room 218 Sample # 980-48 ATTACHMENT B Laboratory results from EMLab P&K, LLC The “Debris Rating” column in the data report is an evaluation of the “non-microbial debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist. Here is a summary of the meaning/significance of those codes. Non- Microbial Particulate Debris Rating Description Interpretation 0 No particles detected in impaction line area. No particulates on slide in impaction line area. The absence of particulates could indicate improper sampling or a blank sample, as most air samples typically contain some particulates 1 Minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. 2 Up to 25% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. 3 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. 4 76% to 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates 5 Greater than 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Sample could not be read due to excessive debris. Reported concentrations are estimations calculated from the number of spores observed on the perimeter of debris. The sample should be collected at shorter time interval, or other measures taken to reduce the collection of non-microbial debris. The Limit of Detection is the product of a raw count of 1 and 100 divided by the percent read. The analytical sensitivity (counts/m3) is the product of the Limit of Detection and 1000 divided by the sample volume. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data. § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision . Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC 3000 Lincoln Drive East, Suite A, Marlton, NJ 08053 (866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: NAUSET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C/O: Mr. Alexander MacLellan Re: 980 G Stony Brook; PRV Date of Submittal: 10-11-2022 Date of Receipt: 10-13-2022 Date of Report: 10-17-2022 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Lab ID-Version‡ Location Air vol. (L) Background Debris Counts of Fungal Structures Fungal Structures/m3 Presumptive Fungal ID (raw counts*) Percentage 14743094-1 10/17/2022 980-43 Room 032 Disturbed 200 1+ 1 72 32 1 5 5 360 160 5 25 § Total: 560 Alternaria (1) Basidiospores (18) Cladosporium (8) Pithomyces (1) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (5) 1 65 29 1 5 Comments: 14743095-1 10/17/2022 980-44 Room 154 Disturbed 200 1+ 1 4 92 56 1 24 2 5 20 460 280 5 120 10 § Total: 900 Alternaria (1) Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (23) Cladosporium (14) Epicoccum (1) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (6) Pithomyces (2) 1 2 51 31 1 13 1 Comments: 14743096-1 10/17/2022 980-45 Room 160 Disturbed 200 1+ 1 64 36 76 5 320 180 380 § Total: 890 Alternaria (1) Basidiospores (16) Cladosporium (9) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (19) 1 36 20 43 Comments: 14743097-1 10/17/2022 980-46 Room 165 Disturbed 200 3+ 4 72 24 20 2 20 360 120 100 10 § Total: 610 Ascospores (1) Basidiospores (18) Cladosporium (6) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (5) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (2) 3 59 20 16 2 Comments: 14743098-1 10/17/2022 980-47 Room 167 Disturbed 200 1+ 56 28 24 1 1 2 280 140 120 5 5 § Total: 550 10 Basidiospores (14) Cladosporium (7) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (6) Pithomyces (1) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (1) Hyphal fragments (2) 51 25 22 1 1 N/A Comments: 14743099-1 10/17/2022 980-48 Room 218 Disturbed 200 1+ 92 80 32 1 460 400 160 § Total: 1,000 5 Basidiospores (23) Cladosporium (20) Penicillium/Aspergillus types (8) Pollen (1) 45 39 16 N/A Comments: Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m3 divided by the raw count. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity mu ltiplied by the sample volume divided by 1000. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. number is . Attachment C Ecology and Pathology of Species Reported Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 1 NOTE: Characteristics of the major species found at levels above 10% and listed above have been collected from the University of Minnesota, Dr. Fungus and EMLab P&K, LLC websites. ascospores ECOLOGY - A general category of spores that have been produced by means of sexual reproduction. Many ascospores can germinate and later produce asexual spores (conidia). To further complicate matters, some asexual fungi can also become sexual under specific conditions, these are considered ascomycetes. PATHOLOGY - This generalized group contains potential opportunistic pathogens and toxin producers. They are suspected allergens, though not yet proven. Aspergillus species ECOLOGY – Spores from this genus are commonly found in outdoor air, but less frequently than Cladosporium, Penicillium, Basidomycetes or yeasts. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Penicillium spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY – Of the more than 150 species and varieties of Aspergillus, some are known to cause diseases in animals and humans. Several species are commonly isolated in schools. Many Asp. Species can produce mycotoxins depending on the substrate on which they are growing. Antigens of Asp. species are available commercially. basidiospores ECOLOGY - Sexual spores from a variety of molds that do not thrive in the indoor environment. PATHOLOGY - Some basidiospores have been shown to cause allergies and asthma. Cladosporium sp. ECOLOGY - They are the most commonly identified outdoor fungus (48-60 species). The most common ones include Cladosporium elatum, Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and Cladosporium cladosporioides. C. herbarum is the most frequently found species in outdoor air in temperate climates. Since it is a “dry” spore formed in very fragile chains, it is easily dispersed, hence often found in air samples. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. While often found indoors their numbers are less than outdoor numbers, implying that the outdoor environment is the source of these spores. Indoor Cladosporium sp. are commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts, on windows with occasional condensation and on wall surfaces in high humidity conditions or occasional condensation. A wide variety of plants serve as food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint, and textiles. They are common in soils, dead organic matter, and the air. These fungi can decompose cellulose and are considered Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 2 “ubiquitous.” PATHOLOGY - The ability to sporulate heavily, ease of dispersal, and buoyant spores makes this fungus the most important fungal airway allergen; causes asthma and hay fever in the Western hemisphere. They are a rare human pathogen. They can cause mycosis and produce greater than 10 antigens (initiators of allergic response) available commercially. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: Type I allergen), Type III hypersensitivity pneumonitis: hot tub lung, moldy wall hypersensitivity, etc. Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Penicillium sp. ECOLOGY - A wide number of organisms have placed in this genus and they are well studied because of their value as producers of antibiotics. Identification to species, among the 200 or so identified to date, is difficult and expensive. They are often found in aerosol and soil samples. They are a ubiquitous saprophyte (meaning they live on dead or decaying organic matter) and “are found everywhere.” They are commonly found in temperate regions in soil, food, cellulose, and grains as well as on living vegetation. They are also found in paint and compost piles and soils. They are commonly found in water-damaged dry wall, damp latex paint, carpet, wallpaper, and on interior fiberglass duct insulation. (Their spores are difficult to differentiate from Aspergillus spores hence they are reported with those spores when only microscopic identification is requested, rather than culturing.) PATHOLOGY - They may cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis and/or allergic alveolitis in susceptible individuals. They are reported to be allergenic (skin). Some species can produce mycotoxins. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: type I). Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Can cause allergic reactions to sensitized people and are associated with mycotic keratosis in humans. Molds - www.epa.gov/iaq/molds [provides link to mold resources] School Sciences - http://www.schoolscience.com/resources/more-topics/mold/ Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. an Air Quality Company P.O. Box 1385 508/247-9167 [800/931-1151] East Orleans, MA 02643 FAX: 508/255-0738 21 November 2022 NES Job #980H Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2692 Dave Caolo Stony Brook Elementary School 384 Underpass Road Brewster, MA 02631 Re: Baseline inspection & sampling in classroom 148 at 384 Underpass Road, Stony Brook Elementary (Brewster) Dear Mr. Caolo: Nauset Environmental Services, Inc. (NES) is pleased to submit this letter report on a mold/moisture inspection with sampling for classroom 148 at 384 Underpass Road. Following ongoing authorization, NES sent Alexander MacLellan, CRMI back to the school on 7 November 2022. This report is CONFIDENTIAL and proprietary and can only be distributed by or with the approval of the Clients to whom it is addressed. BACKGROUND: NES was retained to carry out a sampling to document current mold/moisture conditions in classroom, 148. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: There was NO strong odors noted upon entering classroom 148. The relative humidity was acceptable at RH=37%, 68F temperature in the classroom at the time of this inspection. The hypothesis-based, BASELINE air sampling revealed that the moisture/leak indicator Aspergillus/Penicillium-like spores in classroom 148 were UNDETECTED and hence well below BELOW NES’s informal guideline for the general public (1,000 S/m3), indicating a clean environment. There is NO need for mold remediation in classroom 148. ON SITE ACTIVITIES – Alex MacLellan arrived at 384 Underpass Road Stony Brook Elementary on 7 November at about 10:40 am. Mr. Caolo directed Alex to the room of concern. During this inspection, Alex MacLellan used a calibrated Extech Hygro-Thermometer Pen (Model 445580) to measure temperature and relative humidity that is periodically calibrated to two known humidities. AIR SAMPLING - HYPOTHESIS TESTING Alex MacLellan, with the guidance of Dr. Vaughan determined that an air sampling strategy was needed to address possible potential mold spore contamination in the classroom. The sampling concern was to address the following hypothesis regarding possible environmental issues: BASELINE MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2692 Page 2 Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classroom, 148, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. The airborne mold spore sample was taken in worst case (fan-disturbed) conditions in the classroom. The disturbed sample was taken after blowing the surfaces in the area. The air sample was collected on a Cyclex-d™ cassette for microscopic analysis. [The expiration date for the Cyclex-d™ cassettes used was July 2023.] After the sampling flow rate was confirmed for the pump at 20 lpm using a rotameter transfer standard (traceable to NIST via a BIOS DryCal calibrator), the interior air sample was taken for a timed ten-minute interval using a digital timer. A log sheet documented the activity and conditions during the sampling. No outdoor reference sample was taken since the focus was on indoor conditions. The “disturbed” sample was taken after disturbing the surfaces in the area using a 12” fan set on high speed for a couple of minutes. The drafts from the fan also suspend the mold spores and irritants from hard-to-reach areas where they have settled but would be dislodged by infrequent servicing activities as well as spores from latent (not yet visible) mold growth. The disturbed air sampling began following at least a 3-5-minute calm period that allowed larger particles/debris to settle out of the air and minimize interference/obscurance on the collecting surface in the cassette. The sampling location is found in Table 1. The exposed and labeled air sample cassette was combined with a completed chain of custody form and shipped to EMLab P&K, LLC. (Marlton, NJ). The air sample was designated for “Fungi – Spore Trap Analysis.” The following perspective indicates why EMLab P&K, LLC was selected: ▪ “Because there is currently no governmental certification for environmental microbiology laboratories (except for drinking water and wastewater microbiology), EMLab P&K, LLC is an active participant in the EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing) program sponsored by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). P&K has been formally accredited by the AIHA in Environmental Microbiology since September 1300 with a laboratory identification number of 103005.” ▪ EMLab P&K is one the largest commercial analytical laboratories and is unique in that all of their analytical employees are degreed analysts, the majority with Masters or Ph.D.’s in mycology, microbiology, or a related field. ▪ “EMLab P&K has modeled its quality control system after the ISO guidelines, one of the most stringent sets of international standards in the industry, to ensure that its customers receive the high standard of accuracy, reliability and impartiality that they have come to expect from a leader in the environmental industry.” OBSERVATIONS: Observations at Stony Brook Elementary in classroom 148 during the 7 November site visit are provided below. [Directions left-right and front-back refer to viewing the school from the parking lot.] BASELINE MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2692 Page 3 General ▪ The weather was sunny and breezy with a temperature of 56F. ▪ There was NO strong odor noted on entering the school or the classroom. [Moldy/biological odors come from currently active “microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)” that are released from active colonies digesting the organic matter on which they are growing.] Classroom: 148 ▪ There was NO strong odor noticed upon entering the classroom. ▪ The classroom appeared to be clean and orderly with chairs and desks in place at the time of this inspection. ▪ There were area rugs in 148 at the time of this inspection. ▪ The relative humidity in the classroom was RH=37%, T=68F temperature (see below) an “Air Purifier” was running in the classroom upon arrival but was turned off by Alex prior to the sampling. Table 1 summarizes the sampling locations. Table 2 summarizes the results of the microscopic analysis of air samples from this round of sampling. The EMLab P&K mold report is found in Attachment B. Attachment C describes the properties of the dominant spores and structures found. Table 1 – Mold Spore Sampling Locations (Bold sample numbers indicate disturbed air samples) Sample # Location Comments 980-49 Room 148 disturbed (T=68, RH=37%) DISCUSSION: MOLD - There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples: There are several terms and concepts that should be explained before looking in detail at the data from these samples along with the visual observations: o CONTAMINATION -The terms Condition 2 and 3 used describe mold contamination are part of the December 2015 Institute for Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC), ANSI/IICRC S520-2015, “Standard for Professional Mold Remediation.” Condition 2 involves evidence of “settled spores or fungal fragments dispersed from a Condition 3 contaminated area,” a condition documented to some extent by “disturbed” air samples. Condition 3 refers to “actual mold growth, associated spores and fungal fragment … active or dormant, visible or hidden.” o OUTDOOR SPORES - While ALL molds ultimately originate in nature, outdoors, there are some molds that are referred to as “outdoor fungi.” This term means that that they are found primarily outdoors because they depend on plants, other fungi, or animals to complete their life cycle. Others need a complex ecosystem to complete their life cycle. BASELINE MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2692 Page 4 These outdoor spores may be found indoors because they were transported there but hardly ever develop colonies indoors. These include the ascospores, basidiospores (some coming from mushrooms that develop in the wild) and rusts. When found indoors these “outdoor” spores indicate the space has been experienced air exchange with the outdoors, not growth in response to moist conditions. o INDOOR SPORES - There are some molds that have adapted to a variety of food sources - organic debris, processed wood (i.e., cellulose, paper, etc.) and more - that are commonly found indoors - loosely referred to as “indoor spores,” even though they initially came in from outdoors. With the proper level of damp to wet conditions some of them amplify/grow indoors and serve as moisture/leak indicators. In our area of southern New England, NES has found that the primary moisture/leak-indicators are the Aspergillus and Penicillium molds (referred to as “Asp/Pen-like” when their spores are counted under a microscope since their spores are indistinguishable). Less often NES has found that Cladosporium, the most abundant spore type found in U.S. outdoor air samples, can also amplify under moist conditions indoors and may serve as a secondary moisture/leak indicator. o STANDARDS - Many people look for standards to compare mold readings to with the desire to define a healthy or unhealthy space. Obviously very high spore readings found by counting spores/structures in a collected sample under a microscope (S/m3 - spores/structures per cubic meter sampled) or colony readings found by counting the colonies that develop/grow on a nutrient media after sampled air has impacted that nutrient media (CFU/m3 - colony forming basements per cubic meter) are undesirable. Because of the wide range of human sensitivities or allergic reactions to the irritants in/on mold spores AND the limited scientific research linking spore levels to various immune system reaction, no scientifically-based “standards” have yet been developed by medical or governmental agencies. [One medical commentary was issued in May 2004 by the Institute of Medicine (part of the National Academy of Sciences) in its report on “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health,” in which they state, “there are no generally accepted health-based standards for acceptable concentrations of fungal (mold) spores, hyphae or metabolites in the air.” However, there is informal guidance from industrial hygienists and some allergists to try to keep indoor spore levels below 1,000 S/m3 in order to minimize the irritation for the general population. Some have suggested that a “healthy” level be considered at 500 CFU/m3 or 500 S/m3. NES uses 1,000 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores as its informal guideline for the general population (see explanatory note at www.NausetEnvironmental.com) and 500 S/m3 of Asp/Pen like spores for sensitized individuals. Sensitized or allergic individuals may well be irritated and react at levels well below that guideline level. More information can be found on mold and health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website - http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm.] o DEBRIS RATING - This column in the Attachment B data report for the Cyclex-D spore trap results is an evaluation of the “non-biological debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist.” As more non-biological debris is plated on the impact area during the sampling, it coats and covers spores laid down earlier so that the microscopist cannot see/count the spores. Hence, higher debris ratings indicate difficulty in determining the number/type of spores collected on the sticky surface of the impact area. In addition, the more debris, the greater the chance that a spore would miss a sticky area and NOT even BASELINE MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2692 Page 5 be collected. Hence, higher debris ratings lead to under counting of spores actually in the air. The Debris Rating for each sample is given next to the sample number in Table 2 as DR-#. AIR SAMPLING FINDINGS Looking at the data from Attachment B extracted into Table 2, one sees that: • In room 148 the disturbed sample found NO Asp-Pen-like spores were detected and hence were well-below NES’s informal guidance for the general public of 1000 S/m3 indicating NO need for professional remediation (see below). Table 2 – Airborne Spore Levels (see Attachment B) (Disturbed sample numbers and results are indicated by bold type. Concentrations are expressed as spores/structures per cubic meter, S/m3.) (Acceptable and elevated readings compared to NES’s informal guideline are indicated.) Sample # Total Breakdown of dominant species (~80%) Room 148 980-49[DR 1+] 320 Ascospores (NONE) – 0%Asp-Pen like (NONE) – 0%, basidiospores (140) – 44%, Cladosporium (160) – 51%, NOTE: “Asp-Pen like” refers to Aspergillus and Penicillium spores that are indistinguishable under the light microscope. The symbol “<1%” is read as “less than 1%.” DR = Debris rating (see above) In the samples the DEBRIS RATING of “1+” means there is minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. SUMMARY: AIR SAMPLING: The hypothesis testing by air sampling REFUTED hypothesis A for the spore sample in the classroom meaning conditions there are ACCEPTABLE spore levels in room 148. Hypothesis A There are elevated mold spores and/or irritant levels of concern in classroom 148, especially under disturbed conditions when Condition 2, settled spores, and spores from hidden mold growth, Condition 3, are suspended into the air. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is NO need for professional mold remediation. BASELINE MMI & Sampling at 384 Underpass Rd. (Brewster) Report No. NES/IAQ-22/2692 Page 6 To avoid problems with mold in the future, be attentive to any and all water intrusion or condensation issues, taking general advice from The Mold Survival Guide for Your Classroom and for Your Health by Jeff and Connie May (2004). In particular: ▪ Respond quickly to correct any leaks that may develop or become evident. ▪ If there are allergic or sensitized individuals attending or teaching at the school, use a HEPA filter-equipped vacuum for routine cleaning of flooring and upholstery (at least quarterly) to capture spores and irritants. ▪ Operate an Energy Star-rated dehumidifier on the classroom floor during summer recess with adequate separation from solid objects and in conjunction with a small bilge pump in the collection bucket or a condensate pump outside the basement that discharges the collected water to a suitable drain. The goal is to lower the humidity below 60%, so a modest dry setting is usually sufficient. Periodically clean the basement’s filter following the manufacturer’s instructions. == == == == == == == == == The above discussion and recommendations are related to background information provided and the conditions visually observable at the time of NES’s site visit on 7 November along with the results of sampling activities and are thus limited to these activities and timeframe. Future events and changes in the condition and operation of the school may well alter the conditions for biological activity/growth, especially moisture. Such changes will alter the relative significance of these suggestions and the effectiveness of their implementation. Thus, the impact of such changes cannot be considered part of the scope of this report/work. We trust the above information is sufficient for your current needs. Please call us with any questions or to clarify points. Very truly yours, William M. Vaughan, PhD, QEP, CIEC President, Senior Scientist QEP=Qualified Environmental Professional (since 1994) CIEC=Council-certified Indoor Environment Consultant (#0608017) Alexander D MacLellan`````` Senior Field Tech, CRMI CRMI=Certified residential mold inspector (#0604036) C:\Users\Bill\Documents\BV Files - Dell-HP4\IAQ\980H Stony Brook School 1 Rm Sample BV.RPT.docx Attachment A Photographs Taken During the Inspection & Sampling Stony Brook Elementary School Room 148 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Sample 980-49 A mistake was made in the sample numbering at the time of this sampling ATTACHMENT B Laboratory results from EMLab P&K, LLC The “Debris Rating” column in the data report is an evaluation of the “non-microbial debris on the impact area examined by the microscopist. Here is a summary of the meaning/significance of those codes. Non- Microbial Particulate Debris Rating Description Interpretation 0 No particles detected in impaction line area. No particulates on slide in impaction line area. The absence of particulates could indicate improper sampling or a blank sample, as most air samples typically contain some particulates 1 Minimal non-microbial debris present. Reported values are not affected by debris. 2 Up to 25% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Non-microbial particulates can mask the presence of fungal spores. As a result, actual values could be higher than the numbers reported. Higher debris ratings increase the probability of this bias. 3 26% to 75% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. 4 76% to 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates 5 Greater than 90% of the trace occluded with non-microbial particulates. Sample could not be read due to excessive debris. Reported concentrations are estimations calculated from the number of spores observed on the perimeter of debris. The sample should be collected at shorter time interval, or other measures taken to reduce the collection of non-microbial debris. The Limit of Detection is the product of a raw count of 1 and 100 divided by the percent read. The analytical sensitivity (counts/m3) is the product of the Limit of Detection and 1000 divided by the sample volume. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" greater than 1 indicates amended data. § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision . Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC 3000 Lincoln Drive East, Suite A, Marlton, NJ 08053 (866) 871-1984 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: NAUSET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C/O: Mr. Alexander MacLellan, William M. Vaughan Re: 980H Stony Brook Elem; Baseline Date of Sampling: 11-07-2022 Date of Receipt: 11-08-2022 Date of Report: 11-10-2022 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Lab ID-Version‡ Location Air vol. (L) Background Debris Counts of Fungal Structures Fungal Structures/m3 Presumptive Fungal ID (raw counts*) Percentage 14858413-1 11/10/2022 980-49 Room 148 Disturbed 200 1+ 28 32 2 1 140 160 10 5 § Total: 320 Basidiospores (7) Cladosporium (8) Epicoccum (2) Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes (1) 44 51 3 2 Comments: Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be reg arded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating d ust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m3 divided by the raw count. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity mu ltiplied by the sample volume divided by 1000. *All AIHA accredited laboratories are required to provide raw counts of fungal structures in spore trap reports. These counts are defined by AIHA as "Actual count without extrapolation or calculation". The number in parentheses next to the fungal type represents the exact number (or raw count) of fungal structures observed. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. number is . Attachment C Ecology and Pathology of Species Reported Ecology and Pathology of spores found during sampling Page 1 NOTE: Characteristics of the major species found at levels above 10% and listed above have been collected from the University of Minnesota, Dr. Fungus and EMLab P&K, LLC websites. basidiospores ECOLOGY - Sexual spores from a variety of molds that do not thrive in the indoor environment. PATHOLOGY - Some basidiospores have been shown to cause allergies and asthma. Cladosporium sp. ECOLOGY - They are the most commonly identified outdoor fungus (48-60 species). The most common ones include Cladosporium elatum, Cladosporium herbarum, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, and Cladosporium cladosporioides. C. herbarum is the most frequently found species in outdoor air in temperate climates. Since it is a “dry” spore formed in very fragile chains, it is easily dispersed, hence often found in air samples. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. While often found indoors their numbers are less than outdoor numbers, implying that the outdoor environment is the source of these spores. Indoor Cladosporium sp. are commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts, on windows with occasional condensation and on wall surfaces in high humidity conditions or occasional condensation. A wide variety of plants serve as food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint, and textiles. They are common in soils, dead organic matter, and the air. These fungi can decompose cellulose and are considered “ubiquitous.” PATHOLOGY - The ability to sporulate heavily, ease of dispersal, and buoyant spores makes this fungus the most important fungal airway allergen; causes asthma and hay fever in the Western hemisphere. They are a rare human pathogen. They can cause mycosis and produce greater than 10 antigens (initiators of allergic response) available commercially. They are a common cause of extrinsic asthma (immeadiate-type hypersensitivity: Type I allergen), Type III hypersensitivity pneumonitis: hot tub lung, moldy wall hypersensitivity, etc. Acute symptoms include edema and bronchiospasms, chronic cases may develop pulmonary emphysema. Molds - www.epa.gov/iaq/molds [provides link to mold resources] School Sciences - http://www.schoolscience.com/resources/more-topics/mold/ Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/dampness_facts.htm MUNICIPAL JOBS MUNICIPAL MARKETPLACE CONTACT US NEWSLETTER SIGN UP f ti' in SEARCH Q MEMBERS ADVOCACY NEWS RESOURCES EVENTS ABOUT MMA NOV MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT 111.7 MSBA pauses 2023 Accelerated Repair Home — News —* Municipal Government rod_; At its Oct. 26 meeting, the Board of Directors of the Massachusetts School Building Authority approved a staff recommendation to temporarily pause the Accelerated Repair Program and not accept ARP Statements of Interest in 2023. The ARP provides funding for the repair or replacement of roofs, windows and boilers in schools that are otherwise structurally, functionally and educationally sound. The MSBA said "unanticipated market volatility and supply chain issues have significantly affected project bid results," which are exceeding budget estimates by large margins. The MSBA said the pause of the ARP will provide additional space in the MSBA's Annual Project Approval Cap, which could be used to offset a portion of increases in certain funding limits for the MSBA's Core Program, while minimizing the reduction in invitations to the MSBA's grant program. The ARP pause does not affect the Core Program and does not apply to ARP projects that have already been invited into the MSBA's grant program, including ARP invitations that were approved by the Board of Directors at the Oct. 26 meeting. Five of the 16 Core Program projects for 2022 that have reported bid results to the MSBA received bids in excess of budget estimates. Ten of the 16 projects have obtained, or are preparing to seek, additional funding through an additional appropriation or the use of American Rescue Plan Act funding. To date, five projects that are in the bidding phase have received approval for additional project funding, and one project funding vote failed at town meeting. ARP projects have a similar experience, with projects now estimating unit prices in excess of MSBA funding limits, such as roofing estimated in excess of $50 per square foot, with the MSBA funding limit at $35 per square foot. Additionally, staff shortages at the district level and for consultants have led to delays in processing current projects within the ARP timelines. Higher costs have resulted in some districts withdrawing their SOIs. Supply chain issues have affected construction schedules that were timed for completion during the summer, when most school buildings are unoccupied. The MSBA said its staff will continue to review potential changes to the funding policies for Core Program districts, including a review of the reimbursable construction cost per square foot amount. The potential changes could apply to districts that have not yet received Project Scope and Budget approval as of the Dec. 21 Board of Directors meeting. The MSBA said the 2023 SOI opening for the Core Program is planned for January 2023. 1 News Categories ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LABOR AND PERSONNEL LOCAL AID AND FINANCE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS, ENERGY AND UTILITIES Memorandum of Understanding Between Cape Light Compact JPE and Town of Brewster This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets for the terms and understanding between the Cape Light Compact JPE (Compact) and the Town of Brewster (Town) to provide a part-time Compact staff member to fill the Town of Brewster’s Energy Manager position. Background In 2020, the Town of Brewster approached the Cape Light Compact to staff the Town of Brewster’s Energy Manager position with funds from the Green Communities Designation Grant to focus on the Town’s energy matters. Given the success of this pilot program, both parties are interested in continuing this shared staffing arrangement. This position works for two half-days per week for the Town (for a maximum of 7.5 hours per week). The proposed two half-days are Thursdays from 12:45pm – 4:30pm and Fridays from 8:00am – 11:45am; however, the schedule may vary as mutually agreed upon. Purpose This MOU establishes the responsibilities of each party. The following is a list of current tasks that will be undertaken by the Energy Manager. This list is not exhaustive, but it represents current opportunities. 0 General -Secure and maintain associated energy grants -Provide monthly reporting/updates to appropriate parties (ie. Town Administration) -Provide staff support to Energy Committee, including attending monthly meetings -Investigate other opportunities for both energy savings and revenue (ie. Clean Peak standards) -Communicate and conduct educational outreach on all energy initiatives to residents (content development and schedule for release) -Support Town efforts to address climate mitigation and adaptation goals identified in the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness Plan, Local Comprehensive Plan, Select Board Strategic Plan, and/or other relevant strategic initiatives Assist in developing and implementing a net zero energy roadmap for the Town 1a. Solar and/or Storage Projects -Assist with proposal review, continued review of Schedule Z, installation schedule coordination, and maintenance of solar systems -Work with vendors and CVEC to obtain local approval and program launch -Track project implementation, work with department heads/ staff on review, installation, training and final inspection/sign-off -Coordinate with CVEC, if applicable, on review on the accounts, usage, and production -Primary role in regular reconciliation of usage and credits in coordination with finance office (who serves as a check) -Work with CVEC and/or third-party consultant on maintenance of the systems (ie. overgrown around solar arrays) as well as data acquisition system review (i.e. production reports that shows lower than expected usage) and issue resolution -Work with planning department on solar siting (and potential by-law change) to assure that sites are appropriate and in-line with community standards 1b. Green Communities -Track project implementation, work with department heads/ staff on review, installation, training and final inspection/sign-off -Prioritize projects for the next phase of competitive grants -Utilize Mass Energy Insight (MEI) to track energy usage, create reports, and add new accounts -Produce quarterly and annual reports for the DOER with project updates -Coordinate with the Compact, National Grid, state agencies, and vendors as necessary to prioritize projects and track implementation -Explore adding new facilities to the baseline year in MEI 2. Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure -Assist with review of potential locations for EV charging infrastructure. -Work with Eversource (as applicable), DOER, DEP or other associated infrastructure and equipment grants and funding. -Coordinate onsite review and analysis of various systems -Work with the Town and/or vendor on potential charging mechanisms and ongoing maintenance costs (ie. network charges) Assumptions -The Compact staff member will work both on-site and remotely. -Town will: o Identify Brewster’s primary area of focus relative to energy projects o Sign off on necessary documents o Provide access to financial proof of payment, invoices, etc. that are necessary for grant applications, documentation, and/or reporting o Coordinate access to buildings and sites (where necessary) o Respond to inquiries from Compact as needed o Identify a primary point of contact o Provide feedback on priorities o Provide suitable office space, when necessary, as well as access to email, shared files and other pertinent information. -Cape Light Compact will: o Provide necessary equipment such as a computer, mobile phone, office space, and general training o Employ and supervise a full-time staff person and assign staff to serve as the part-time Brewster Energy Manager position. Funding and Invoicing Once the Green Communities Designation Grant funds have been fully spent, the Energy Manager position will be funded through solar lease payments for the carport photovoltaic installation at the Captains Golf Course. This funding will be used to reimburse the Cape Light Compact for $409.81/week for 7.5 hours of work. Any cost of living or step increase that occurs during the term of this MOU will adjust the weekly reimbursement amount accordingly. In addition, the Town will reimburse the Compact for mileage (at the IRS rate) from the Compact’s office to the requested destination as well as any general reimbursable expenses. These will be billed monthly to the Town, and payment should be remitted within 45 days. Duration This MOU may be modified by mutual consent of authorized officials from Cape Light Compact JPE and the Town of Brewster. This MOU shall become effective upon signature by the authorized officials and will remain in effect through December 31, 2023 or until modified or terminated by any one of the partners by mutual consent. In the absence of mutual agreement by the authorized officials from Cape Light Compact JPE and the Town of Brewster this MOU shall end on December 31, 2023. Contact Information Cape Light Compact JPE Margaret T. Downey Administrator 261 Whites Path, Unit 4, South Yarmouth, MA 02664 508-375-6636 mdowney@capelightcompact.org Town of Brewster Peter Lombardi Town Administrator 2198 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 508-896-3701 plombardi@brewster-ma.gov ________________________Date: (Signature) (Margaret T. Downey, Cape Light Compact JPE, Administrator) ________________________Date: (Signature) (Peter Lombardi, Town of Brewster, Town Administrator) Memorandum of Understanding Between Cape Light Compact JPE and Town of Brewster This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets for the terms and understanding between the Cape Light Compact JPE (Compact) and the Town of Brewster (Town) to provide a part-time Compact staff member to fill the Town of Brewster's Energy Manager position. Background In 2020, the Town of Brewster approached the Cape Light Compact to staff the Town of Brewster's part-time Energy Manager position with funds from the Green Communities Designation Grant to focus on the Town's energy matters. This position works for two half -days per week for the Town (for a total of 7.5 hours per week). The proposed two half -days are Thursdays from 12:45pm — 4:30pm and Fridays from 8:00am — 11:45am. Purpose This MOU will establish the responsibilities of each party. The following is a list of current tasks that could be undertaken by an Energy Manager for the Town of Brewster. This list is not exhaustive, but it represents current opportunities. 0 General Secure and maintain associated energy grants Coordinate with other overlapping grants/efforts (ie. MVP), if applicable Provide monthly reporting/updates to appropriate parties (ie. Town contact, Select Board) Attend the energy committee meetings, as necessary (at most monthly meetings) Investigate other opportunities for both energy savings and revenue (ie. Clean Peak standards) Communication and educational outreach on all energy initiatives to residents (content development and schedule for release). Town to disseminate through traditional avenues. Climate initiatives and alignment with the anticipated Town Meeting warrant on net zero emissions la. Solar and/or Storage Projects (most timely of all tasks) Assist with proposal review, internal review of Schedule Z, installation schedule coordination, and maintenance of solar systems. Work with vendors and CVEC to obtain local approval and program launch Track project implementation, work with department heads/ staff on review, installation, training and final inspection/sign-off Coordinate with CVEC, if applicable, on review on the accounts, usage, and production. Primary role in regular reconciliation of usage and credits in coordination with finance office (who serves as a check) Work with CVEC and/or third -party consultant on maintenance of the systems (ie. overgrown around solar arrays) as well as data acquisition system review (i.e. production reports that shows lower than expected usage) and issue resolution Work with planning department on solar siting (and potential by-law change) to assure that sites are appropriate and in -line with community standards 1b. Green Communities - Track project implementation, work with department heads/ staff on review, installation, training and final inspection/sign-off Prioritize projects for the next phase — Competitive Grants — most likely Fall 2021 or beyond Coordinate with Green Communities' REPA point -of -contact * These tasks are currently under the DOER's Regional Energy Planning Assistance (REPA) Grant with funding until May 31, 2021, but it could continue past this time. 2. Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure Assist with review of potential locations for EV charging infrastructure. Work with Eversource (as applicable), DOER, DEP or other associated infrastructure and equipment grants and funding. Coordinate onsite review and analysis of various systems Work with the Town and/or vendor on potential charging mechanisms and ongoing maintenance costs (ie. network charges) Assumptions The Compact staff member will work both on -site and remotely. Town will: o Identify Brewster's primary area of focus relative to energy projects o Sign off on necessary documents o Provide access to financial proof of payment, invoices, etc. that are necessary for grant applications, documentation, and/or reporting o Coordinate access to buildings and sites (where necessary) o Respond to inquiries from Compact as needed o Identify a primary point of contact o Provide feedback on priorities o Provide suitable office space, when necessary, as well as access to email, shared files and other pertinent information. Cape Light Compact will: o Provide necessary equipment such as a computer, mobile phone, office space, and general training o Employ and supervise a full-time staff person and assign staff to serve as the part-time Brewster Energy Manager position. Funding and Invoicing The Town was awarded funding from the Department of Energy Resource's Green Communities Program for their Designation Grant for an Energy Manager. This funding will be used to reimburse the Cape Light Compact for $386.28/week for 7.5 hours of work in Year 1. Future years will be funded with a portion of proceeds from a lease agreement related to the solar carport at the Captain's Golf course driving range parking lot. In addition, the Town will reimburse the Compact for mileage (at the IRS rate) from the Compact's office to the requested destination as well as any general reimbursable expenses. These will be billed monthly to the Town, and payment should be remitted within 45 days. Duration This MOU may be modified by mutual consent of authorized officials from Cape Light Compact JPE and the Town of Brewster. This MOU shall become effective upon signature by the authorized officials and will remain in effect until June 30, 2022 or until modified or terminated by any one of the partners by mutual consent. In the absence of mutual agreement by the authorized officials from Cape Light Compact JPE and the Town of Brewster, this MOU shall end effective June 30, 2022. It is the intent of both parties to continue this MOU beyond the initial one (1) calendar year term provided that the arrangement proves to be mutually beneficial. Contact Information Cape Light Compact JPE Margaret T. Downey Administrator 261 Whites Path, Unit 4, South Yarmouth, MA 02664 508-375-6636 mdowney@capelightcompact.org Town of Brewster Peter Lombardi Town Administrator 2198 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 508-896-3701 plombardi@brewster-ma.gov Date31a i Jal (Signature) (M garb T. Downey, Cape Light Compact JPE, Administrator) (Signature) (Peter Lombardi, Town of Brewster, Town Administrator) Date: 5 2 ! J 2 Energy Committee MEMBERSHIP The Committee shall be appointed by the Select Board and shall be comprised of six members as follows: 5 citizens, as voting members Town Administrator or delegate, as an ex officio member and for administrative support "18 MART TOW The Committee's membership shall include the Town's appointed representatives to the Cape Light Compact (CLC) and to the Cape & Vineyard Electric Cooperative (CVEC). CHARGE The Committee is charged to evaluate the energy -related performance of the Town's municipal buildings, facilities, and equipment; to assess the economic and practical feasibility of energy - related upgrades and clean energy projects on municipal property; and to assist the Town and the entire community, through outreach and education, in lowering energy bills and reducing fossil fuel consumption, increasing reliance on renewable resources, and decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. In support of this charge, the Committee shall coordinate with the Town Administrator and Select Board, CLC and CVEC, and the Finance Committee, the Capital Planning Committee, the Building and Space Needs Committee, and other committees as appropriate. The Committee also shall coordinate with community and business groups. Activities undertaken under this charge shall include but are not limited to (1) Energy Management: Monitoring and benchmarking energy use by Town buildings and departments, tracking municipal renewable energy production and procurement, recommending energy -related goals and actions both for municipal operations and for the entire community, and measuring and motivating progress. (2) Municipal Energy Use: Identifying energy- and cost -saving opportunities, researching clean energy options, and evaluating and recommending appropriate equipment, systems, and solutions for reducing municipal energy bills and emissions. (3) Community Energy Use: Supporting outreach and education to build consumer awareness of clean energy options and increase community -wide participation in programs offered by CLC and other organizations. The Committee shall report to the Select Board on energy -related matters and shall make recommendations for future action. The Committee also shall provide information to the public, in coordination with the Town. Administrator, Select Board, and others as appropriate. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-3701 Phone: (508) 896-3701 Fax: (508) 896-8089 MEMORANDUM TO: Brewster Select Board CC: Peter Lombardi, Town Administrator; Donna Kalinick, Assistant Town Administrator FROM: Caitlin Cantella, Energy Manager RE: Energy and Climate Action Committee DATE: November 30, 2022 In the last few years, the Town of Brewster has identified climate change mitigation and adaptation as a critical goal to the Town’s future. Since Brewster was designated a Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) Community in 2019, specific actions to reduce the Town’s susceptibility to the effects of climate change have been detailed in the Town’s MVP Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan. In 2020, Brewster voters approved the Climate Emergency and Net Zero Declaration, recognizing the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as a crucial policy objective. Just this year, Brewster updated both its proposed Local Comprehensive Plan and its Select Board Strategic Plan to include climate mitigation and adaptation goals. Consistent with the objectives and policies detailed above, the Town of Brewster proposes to form the Energy and Climate Action Committee (ECAC) as an advisory committee to the Select Board. While the Town currently has an Energy Committee, the present goals of the Town have evolved beyond energy efficiency and conservation to include greenhouse gas reduction and implementation of climate change mitigation policies and goals. Several other towns on Cape Cod have also formed similar Energy and Climate Action Committees, including Harwich, Chatham, Orleans, and Wellfleet, with charges that incorporate both energy and climate initiatives. As demonstrated in the committee charge below, the Brewster ECAC integrates the Town’s climate mitigation and adaptation goals into the existing Energy Committee’s directives regarding energy efficiency, conservation, and public outreach. Creation of the Brewster ECAC acknowledges that energy reduction and efficiency goals are innately tied to curbing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the effects of climate change. In addition to consideration of the ECAC charge language below, the Select Board is also asked to consider whether to allow one non-voter resident to be on such a committee if approved. Energy and Climate Action Committee The Committee shall be appointed by the Select Board and shall be comprised of seven voting members for three-year staggered terms. The Brewster representatives to the boards of the Cape Light Compact and the Cape and Vineyard Electric Cooperative shall be ex-officio members, if not full members of the Committee. The Committee will report to the Select Board on energy- and climate-related matters and shall make recommendations for future action. The Committee shall coordinate with relevant Brewster committees and outside organizations as necessary to accomplish its charge as set forth below. PRIMARY CHARGE (1)The Committee is charged to evaluate the economic and practical feasibility of all energy-related projects and climate change-related activities on Town municipal property. Activities undertaken under this charge include but are not limited to such things as: A.Evaluating and making recommendations regarding energy efficiency, energy conservation, and greenhouse gas reduction for Town facilities, projects, and practices. B.Reviewing Town bylaws, regulations, and policies to promote energy efficiency, renewable energy, and climate change mitigation, and making recommendations to Town administration. (2)The Committee is charged to conduct educational outreach to residents and businesses on climate change mitigation and adaptive strategies, as well as energy-related matters, in coordination with the Town Administrator and/or the Select Board. (3)The Committee is charged to lead Town efforts to address climate mitigation and adaptation goals, as identified in the Town’s Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness Hazard Mitigation Plan, Climate Emergency and Net Zero Declaration, Local Comprehensive Plan and Select Board Strategic Plan. Where appropriate, these efforts are to be coordinated with the Natural Resources Advisory Commission, and recommendations are to be brought forward to Town administration. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 1 of 13 Report of the Special Town Meeting Monday, November 14th, 2022 In accordance with the Warrant, the Special Town Meeting was held at the Stony Brook Elementary School, 384 Underpass Road on Monday, November 14th, 2022. A quorum was present with 594 of 8634 eligible voters. 7% The Special Town Meeting of November 14th, 2022 was called to order by Moderator Charles Sumner at 6:00pm. The counters and tellers were Nancy Burdych, Cynthia Mathison, Lauren Elliott-Grunes, June Cameron, Robert Harris, Jayanne Monger, Assistant Town Clerk. Thaddeus Nabywaniec, Sally Andreola and Nancy Whitehurst, Board of Registrars. Town Meeting was held indoors in the Elementary School gymnasium. The Moderator, Charles Sumner made a few announcements before proceeding with Town Meeting. He has filed a Conflict of Interest statement relative to 2 articles and for 2 articles (Art. 2, 5A – Stony Brook Mill Retaining Wall and Art. 5 – Community Preservation Act Bylaw Amendment) he has appointed a Deputy Moderator, duly sworn by himself. Due to the overflow crowd, the library has been set up for seating as well. Benjamin DeRuyter was the Deputy Moderator appointed by the Moderator for this meeting to preside over the library and articles that Moderator Sumner will be abstaining from. Also, Stephen Narjarian was appointed Deputy Moderator, duly sworn, to cover the library while Deputy Moderator DeRuyter was covering for Moderator Charles Sumner. Brewster follows Town Meeting Time for their Town Meeting rules of order, but the Moderator has some discretion on time limits, which he may extend as a courtesy. The Moderator announced that John Ward a Department of Public Works employee would be retiring after 50 years with the Town of Brewster. Posting and return of service of the Special Town Meeting warrant was confirmed. There being no objections the Moderator began dispensing with the articles 6:11pm OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS ARTICLE NO. 1: To see what sums the Town will vote to appropriate from available funds for the payment of unpaid obligations from previous fiscal years, including any bills now on overdraft: Department Outstanding Obligations Amount a. Brewster Elementary Schools Wages $1,777.00 b. Utilities Eversource $144.92 c. Employee Benefits Department of Unemployment Assistance $2,545.00 d. Building Department WB Mason $127.99 Total $4,594.91 Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Nine-Tenths Vote Required) Motion by Select Board Member Edward “Ned” Chatelain: I move to approve Article Number 1 as printed in the warrant and as funding therefor to transfer the sum of $4,594.91 from Free Cash. ACTION: Adopted Unanimously. Voter Cards. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 2 of 13 6:12pm CAPITAL AND SPECIAL PROJECTS EXPENDITURES ARTICLE NO. 2: To see what sums the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, or authorize the Town Treasurer to borrow under and pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 44, Sections 7, 7(1), or 8, or any other enabling authority, for the capital outlay expenditures listed below, including, in each case, all incidental and related costs, to be expended by the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board, except School expenditures to be made by the School Superintendent with the approval of the School Committee; authorize leases and lease purchase agreements for more than three but not more than five years for those items to be leased or lease purchased, and further that the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board or School Superintendent with the approval of the School Committee for school items, be authorized to sell, convey, trade-in or otherwise dispose of equipment being replaced, all as set forth below: Department/Project Item Funding Source(s) / Appropriation or Transfer Amount 1. Select Board a. DBP Master Plan Update- Phase 1 Construction Professional services and construction costs of park improvements Free Cash $255,000 b. Sea Camps Comprehensive Planning Professional services associated with developing a comprehensive plan regarding future uses of the former Sea Camps properties Free Cash $175,000 c. Updated Ponds Water Quality Report (IWRMP) Professional services associated with creating a pond water quality database and reviewing data to identify future needs Water Quality Stabilization $50,000 Department/Project Item Funding Source(s) / Appropriation or Transfer Amount d. Sea Camps Interim Uses Costs for events, programming, and increasing public access/awareness Free Cash $50,000 e. Integrated Water Resource Planning/ Implementation Professional services associated with technical assistance regarding water quality planning and initiatives Free Cash $35,000 Sub-Total $565,000 2. Department of Public Works a. Sea Camps Pool Parking Lot Professional services for engineering, permitting, and construction of new parking area, including but not limited to paving, installation of stormwater infrastructure, and landscaping Free Cash $250,000 b. Drainage/ Road Maintenance Professional services for engineering, permitting, and construction associated with road maintenance and drainage Free Cash $225,000 Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 3 of 13 c. Loader/ Backhoe Purchase and outfit (1) backhoe/loader, including but not limited to plow package, emergency lighting, and radio Free Cash $200,000 d. Pick-up Truck Purchase and outfit (1) 4x4 pick-up truck, including but not limited to plow package, emergency lighting, and radio Free Cash $60,000 Sub-Total $735,000 3. Police Department a. Vehicle Replacement Purchase and outfit (2) Police vehicles Free Cash $115,000 b. Security Pen/Fencing Purchase and install fencing and traffic direction signage/devices at the Police facility Free Cash $50,000 c. Live Scan Data Sharing Purchase and install an electronic fingerprint and booking photograph system Free Cash $42,500 Sub-Total $207,500 4. Fire Department a. Department Staffing and Organization Study Professional services associated with staffing and organizational analysis to determine current and future departmental needs Free Cash / Ambulance Fund $35,000 b. Assistance to Firefighter Grant Program Expenses Costs associated with providing the Town’s required 5% local match to accept and expend grant funding Ambulance Fund $20,000 Sub-Total $55,000 Department/Project Item Funding Source(s) / Appropriation or Transfer Amount 5. Natural Resources a. Stony Brook Mill Retaining Wall & Fishway Improvements Permitting Professional services associated with design, permitting and any other related costs Free Cash $40,000 b. Walkers Pond Water Quality Improvements Professional services associated with design, permitting, and any other related costs Water Quality Stabilization $32,000 Sub-Total $72,000 6. Facilities a. Town Hall Window Replacement Purchase and install replacement windows and any related costs Free Cash $150,000 b. Town Hall and Library Elevator Upgrades Costs associated with upgrades to meet new state safety requirements Free Cash $10,000 c. Crosby Mansion Function Room HVAC Purchase and install mini- split units in mansion function room and any related costs Free Cash $25,000 Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 4 of 13 d. Sea Camps Landscaping Equipment Purchase mowers and landscaping equipment Free Cash $17,500 Sub-Total $202,500 7. Recreation a. Freemans Fields Irrigation Repair & Maintenance Costs associated with maintaining and repairing irrigation systems at Freemans Fields Free Cash $20,000 Sub-Total $20,000 8. Library a. Library Elevator Replacement Purchase and install a new elevator including any other related costs Free Cash $300,000 Sub-Total $300,000 9. Information Technology a. Technology Upgrades / Replacement Ongoing information system & equipment improvements, including but not limited to the purchase of computers, software, servers, and other hardware/ software throughout the Town, including new cloud-based assessing software Overlay / Free Cash $35,000 Sub-Total $35,000 10. Assessors a. Valuation Services Professional services for new growth and cyclical inspection as required by the Department of Revenue Overlay $80,000 Sub-Total $80,000 11. Water Department a. Tanks Exterior Painting Engineering Professional services including engineering, oversight, and construction for interior and exterior repairs on Tanks 1 & 2 Water Retained Earnings $110,000 b. Land Acquisition for Water Protection Funding to assist with acquisition costs of former Sea Camps Long Pond parcel Water Retained Earnings $35,000 Sub-Total $145,000 12. Golf Department a. Maintenance Equipment Purchase (3) three spray rigs and any golf maintenance equipment Golf Reserves $380,000 b. Cart Path Improvements Costs associated with paving and repairing cart paths Golf Reserves $120,000 c. Additional HVAC / Boiler Upgrades Additional funding for the replacement of the HVAC/Boiler system and any other related costs Golf Reserves $75,000 d. Irrigation Replacement Design Professional services associated with the design of a new 36-hole irrigation system Golf Reserves $75,000 Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 5 of 13 e. Clubhouse Surroundings & Theme Enhancements Purchase and install materials and supplies to upgrade area around clubhouse Golf Reserves $30,000 f. Sink Hole Repairs Purchase of materials to fill and repair sink holes throughout the property Golf Reserves $20,000 g. Kitchen Equipment Replacement Purchase and install replacement kitchen equipment and other related costs Golf Reserves $15,000 h. Replace Forward Tees Purchase and install materials to create new forward tees Golf Reserves $15,000 Sub-Total $730,000 Grand Total $3,147,000 Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required, except Two-Thirds Vote for Stabilization Fund Appropriations) Motion made by Citizen Carol Marie Anderson: I move to divide the article and vote separately on each of Article 2’s line items. ACTION: Defeated. Voter Cards. ●Deputy Moderator Benjamin DeRuyter presided over this motion. Motion by Select Board Member Edward “Ned” Chatelain: I move to approve item 5a as printed in the warrant, with the amounts appropriated by this vote to be expended at the direction of the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. Amendment to Motion made by Len Egert: I move to postpone indefinitely subsection 1a of Article 2. ACTION on Amendment to Motion: Adopted. Voter Cards. Citizen Gisele Gauthier: I make a motion to move the question. ACTION on Motion: Adopted. Voter Cards. Motion by Select Board Member Edward “Ned” Chatelain: I move to approve Article Number 2, excepting items 1c, 5a, and 5b, all for the purposes, from the funding sources, and in the amounts as printed in the warrant, including $25,000 from the Ambulance Fund and $10,000 from Free Cash for item 4a, and $25,000 from Free Cash and $10,000 from Overlay for item 9a; the amounts appropriated by this vote shall be expended at the direction of the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board, except School expenditures to be made by the School Superintendent with the approval of the School Committee; that the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board, or School Superintendent with the approval of the School Committee for school items, are authorized to sell, convey, trade-in or otherwise dispose of equipment being replaced by this vote. ►Amended Totals presented by the Finance Director Marilyn Bernardo – with the removal of 1a. the new amended total in section 1. $310,000. – new article total $2,892,000. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. Motion by Select Board Member Edward “Ned” Chatelain:I move to approve items 1c and 5b as printed in the warrant, with the amounts appropriated by this vote to be expended at the direction of the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 6 of 13 ACTION: Adopted by a Moderator declared 2/3 majority. Voter Cards. 7:36pm COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT FUNDING ARTICLE NO. 3: To see if the Town will vote to act upon the recommendations of the Community Preservation Committee; to appropriate from Fund Balances Reserved for future expenditure, the amounts shown below, for the purpose of future expenditures, operating and administration expenses, and reserve funds related to Community Preservation, Historic Preservation, Open Space, Community Housing and/or Recreation; and to authorize the Town Administrator to enter into contracts for operating and administration related to Community Preservation, Historic Preservation, Community Housing and Open Space and/or Recreation, all as follows: Purpose Item Funding Source(s) Amount 1 a. Brewster Historical Society Relocation and restoration of Brewster Schoolhouse #3 including costs associated with permitting, engineering, historical consultation, furnishings, equipment, connection of utilities and services, and all costs incidental or related thereto. Transfer $357,200 from Historic Preservation Fund balance $357,200 Sub-total $357,200 Grand Total $357,200 For Fiscal Year 2023 Community Preservation purposes, each item is considered a separate appropriation to be spent by the Community Preservation Committee; provided however, that the above expenditures may be conditional on the grant or acceptance of appropriate historic preservation restrictions for historic resources, open space restrictions for open space reserves, and housing restrictions for community housing, running in favor of an entity authorized by the Commonwealth to hold such restrictions for such expenditures, meeting the requirements of MGL Ch. 184 and MGL Ch. 44B Sec. 12, and to authorize the Select Board to convey or accept such restrictions; And further, any revenues received in excess of the estimated receipts are transferred to their respective reserve fund balance(s) for future appropriation using the allocation formula of 50% Open Space, 10% Housing, 10% Historical and 30% for Budgeted Reserve for CPA. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Community Preservation Committee) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Community Preservation Chair Faythe Ellis: I move to approve Article Number 3, all for the purposes, from the funding sources, and in the amounts as printed in the warrant. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. 10:03pm CONSERVATION RESTRICTION ACQUISITION: 0 HOLLY AVE (REAR) ARTICLE NO. 4: To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Select Board to acquire a perpetual conservation restriction under MGL Ch. 184, Secs. 31 through 33, on a parcel of land designated on Brewster Assessors’ Map 137 as Parcel 1, located at 0 Holly Ave (Rear), in Brewster, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, consisting of 4.925 acres as shown on a plan of land entitled “Plan of Land in Brewster (East), Mass. as claimed by Richard O. Staff, Scale 1 in = 50 ft. October 1967, Schofield Brothers Registered Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors, Orleans & Framingham, Mass.” and recorded in the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds as Plan Book 219, Page 79, a copy of which is on file with the Brewster Town Clerk; to acquire interests in said parcel by gift, purchase and/or eminent domain taking under MGL Ch. 79, or any other enabling authority; to Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 7 of 13 acquire said conservation restriction for conservation and passive recreation purposes for the general public, consistent with the provisions of MGL Ch. 40 Sec. 8C and Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and in compliance with MGL Ch. 44B, Sec. 12(a), protecting the property for the purposes for which it is acquired; to transfer from available funds, including, without limitation, the Community Preservation Fund, the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-four Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($264,000.00) to pay costs of this acquisition, and all other costs incidental and related thereto; further, to authorize the Select Board and/or the Conservation Commission to apply for, accept and expend any funds that may be provided by the Commonwealth or other public or private sources to defray all or a portion of the costs of said acquisition, including, but not limited to, grants and/or reimbursement from the Commonwealth under the Self-Help Act, MGL Ch. 132A Sec. 11 (now, so-called LAND grants), and the Federal Land and Water Fund grants, which grants and/or funds so received shall be used to repay all or a portion of the sum transferred from the Community Preservation Fund hereunder; to authorize the Conservation Commission to assume the monitoring and enforcement authority of the conservation restriction on the property; and to authorize the Select Board and Conservation Commission to enter into all agreements and execute any and all instruments as may be necessary on behalf of the municipality to effect this purchase and obtain reimbursement funding; Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Community Preservation Committee) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Mary Chaffee: I move to approve Article Number 4 as printed in the warrant and as funding therefor transfer the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-four Thousand and 00/100 dollars ($264,000) from Community Preservation Act Open Space Reserve funds. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. 10:16pm TOWN CODE AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT BYLAW ARTICLE NO. 5: To see if the Town will vote to amend the General Bylaws, Section 17, as shown below, with additions shown in bold and deletions shown in strikethrough, with such revision to take effect on July 1, 2023: Section 17-1. Membership of the Committee – There is hereby established a Community Preservation Committee, consisting of nine (9) voting members. pursuant to the provisions of Section 298 of Chapter 149 of the Acts of 2004, as amended by Sections 129-133 of Chapter 352 of the Acts of 2004. The composition of the Committee, the appointing authority and the term of office for the committee members shall be as follows; one member of the Conservation Commission, as designated by said Commission; one member of the Historical Commission, as designated by said Commission; one member of the Planning Board, designated by the said Board; one member of the Recreation Commission, as designated by the Commission; one member of the Brewster Housing Authority, as designated by said Authority; and four individuals to be appointed by the Select Board of Selectmen. Each member of the Committee shall serve a term of three years or until the person no longer serves in the position or on the board or on the committee as set forth above, whichever is earlier. Should any of the officers and commissions, boards or committees who have appointing authority under this bylaw be no longer in existence for whatever reason, the Select Board of Selectmen shall appoint a suitable person to serve in their place. Any member of the committee may be removed by the Selectmen, with prior notice to the member and a hearing, for good cause. Section 17-2. Duties – The Community Preservation Committee shall study the needs, possibilities and resources of the town regarding community preservation. A. Annually, the Committee shall consult with existing municipal boards, including the Conservation Commission, the Recreation Commission, the Historical Commission, the Planning Board, the Department of Public Works, and the Housing Authority, or persons acting in those capacities or performing like duties, in conducting such studies. As part of its study, the committee shall hold one or more public informational hearings, at its discretion, on the needs, possibilities, and resources of the town regarding community preservation possibilities and resources, notice of which shall be posted publicly and published for each of two weeks preceding a hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the town. B. Every five years ending in 2 and 7: (1) The Committee shall conduct a public process to develop a Community Preservation Plan (“CPP”) establishing goals for expenditures in each of the eligible categories. The CPP shall Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 8 of 13 include a Target Allocation Policy (“TAP”) setting forth non-binding guidelines for the next five years for the allocation of CPA funds amongst eligible expenditure categories, expressed as percentages of estimated annual revenues. (2) Following adoption of the CPP under Section B(1), the non-binding TAP contained therein shall be presented to Town Meeting as a proposed amendment to Section 17-4(B) of this bylaw. Section 17-3. The Community Preservation Committee shall make recommendations no less than annually to the Town Meeting for the acquisition, creation and preservation of open space, for the acquisition and preservation of historic resources, for the acquisition, creation and preservation of land for recreational use, for the creation, preservation and support of community housing and for rehabilitation or restoration of such open space, historic resources, land for recreational use and community housing that is acquired or created as provided in this section. Section 17-4. A. Annual Minimum Recommendations. As required by MGL Ch. 44B Sec. 6, in every fiscal year, the Community Preservation Committee shall recommend that Town Meeting spend, or set aside for future spending, the fixed figure of fifty (50%) ten (10%) percent of the net CPA estimated annual revenues in the Community Preservation Fund for open space and recreation purposes, not less than ten (10%) percent of the net CPA estimated annual revenues for community housing purposes, and not less than ten (10%) percent of the net CPA estimated annual revenues for historic resources purposes. In every fiscal year, the Community Preservation Committee shall recommend that Town Meeting spend or set aside for future spending the remaining thirty (30%) percent of the net annual revenues for community housing, recreation and historic resources purposes, but not for open space purposes. B. For the fiscal years FY24 through FY27, and until otherwise voted by Town Meeting, the non-binding TAP shall be as follows: 30% open space; 30% community housing; 10% recreation; 10% historic preservation, and 20% to be allocated as recommended by the CPC. Actual CPC recommendations may vary from the non-binding percentages set forth in the TAP. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the net annual revenues paid into the Community Preservation Fund shall be dedicated to open space purposes until such time as prior appropriations made pursuant to the so-called Land Bank Act have been fully expended, even if the aggregate amount of such expenditures exceeds 80% of the annual revenues. Section 17-5. Provided that the Community Preservation Act is accepted at the 2005 Annual Town Election, this section shall take effect upon approval by the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and after all the requirements of Mass. Gen. Laws, ch. 40, § 32 have been met. Each appointing authority shall have thirty (30) days after the effective date to make its appointments. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Mary Chaffee: I move to approve Article Number 5 as printed in the warrant, but changing the word “Selectmen” to “Select Board” in the last line of Section 17-1, with such revisions, if approved, to take effect on July 1, 2023. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. 9:53pm TOWN BYLAW AMENDMENT: LIMITS OF DEBATE ARTICLE NO. 6: To see if the Town will vote to amend the General Bylaws, Section 48-11B, by striking the word “three” and replacing it with “one and a half”, as shown below, with additions shown in bold and deletions shown in strikethrough: § 48-11 Limit of debate. A. presenter of a motion may speak up to five minutes when presenting the motion except for motions that the Moderator has given specific permission for more time. B. Following speakers may have up to three one and a half minutes to speak on a motion. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 9 of 13 C. Speakers to each motion may speak no more than twice, except for the presenter of a motion who may speak to comments or questions made by voters with respect to the motion presented. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Chair David Whitney: I move to indefinitely postpone Article No. 6. ACTION: Adopted to Indefinitely Postpone. Voter Cards. 10:01pm TOWN BYLAW AMENDMENT: QUORUM REQUIREMENT ARTICLE NO. 7: To see if the Town will vote to amend the General Bylaws, Section 48-5, by inserting the following new sentence to the end of the section: “Once quorum has been attained and Town Meeting has been called to order, minimum quorum requirements no longer apply.” as shown below, with additions shown in bold: § 48-5 Requirement. The quorum for Annual Town Meetings and for Special Town Meetings is hereby set at 200 registered voters. Once quorum has been attained and Town Meeting has been called to order, minimum quorum requirements no longer apply. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Chair David Whitney: I move to indefinitely postpone Article No. 7. ACTION: Adopted to Indefinitely Postpone. Voter Cards. 8:00pm NEW TOWN BYLAW/RECONSIDERATION ARTICLE NO. 8: To see if the Town will vote to establish a new General Bylaw, as shown below, with additions shown in bold, and further to authorize the Town Clerk to assign the proper chapter and section numbers to said by-law, consistent with the current numbering system: §XX-XX Motions for Reconsideration A motion to reconsider an article previously voted on by Town Meeting must be made within one (1) hour of the conclusion of the relevant vote and shall require a 2/3 majority vote for approval. If a Town Meeting is continued from one date to another, a motion to reconsider any article must be made on the same day as the original vote. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Chair David Whitney: I move to approve Article Number 8 as printed in the warrant. ACTION: Defeated. Voter Cards. 8:20pm TOWN BYLAW AMENDMENT: SPECIAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT DEADLINE ARTICLE NO. 9: To see if the Town will vote to amend the General Bylaws, Section 48-3, by inserting the following new sentence to the end of the section to establish a deadline for closing warrants to petitioned articles, as shown below, with additions in bold: § 48-3 Closing of warrant. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 10 of 13 The warrant for the Annual Town Meeting will be closed to citizen petitioned articles 75 days before each Annual Town Meeting and be in the hands of the Finance Committee by 60 days before each Annual Town Meeting, commencing in 1980. The warrant for any special town meeting will be closed to citizen petitioned articles 45 days before each special town meeting; provided, however, that the Select Board may close the warrant for a special town meeting at any time prior to the 15th day before such meeting if it determines that the 45-day deadline is impractical under the circumstances of a particular meeting. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Chair David Whitney: I move that Article Number 9 be indefinitely postponed. ACTION: Adopted to Indefinitely Postpone. Voter Cards. 8:23pm LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARTICLE NO. 10: To see if the Town will vote to adopt an updated Master Plan for Brewster which has been developed by the Vision Planning Committee, a copy of which plan is on file at the Town Clerk's office and posted on the Town's website, and which plan if adopted by the Town Meeting would constitute Brewster’s Local Comprehensive Plan as defined in Section 9 of the Cape Cod Commission Act (Chapter 716 of the Acts of 1989). Or take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board & Planning Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Kari Hoffmann: I move to approve Article Number 10 as printed in the warrant. ACTION: Motion made by Citizen Carol Marie Anderson: I move to indefinitely postpone Article 10. ACTION on Motion by Carol Marie Anderson: Defeated. Voter Cards. Motion made by Citizen Leonard Egert: I move to commit Article 10 and the Local Comprehensive plan to the Vison Planning Committee for further review. ACTION on Motion by Leonard Egert: Yes – 248, No – 148. Counted. ● The Moderator Charles Sumner announced that Article No. 11 was preferred by Bond Counsel to have a 2/3 vote to pass, not just a majority. 10:33pm TEMPORARY EASEMENTS: MILLSTONE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ARTICLE NO. 11: To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Select Board to acquire, by purchase, gift, and/or eminent domain, permanent and/or temporary right of way, utility, drainage, access, construction and other easements in, on, under, and across the parcels of land at or near Millstone Road for the purpose of improving Millstone Road and for any and all purposes and uses incidental or related thereto, and, further, to raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, and/or borrow a sum of money for the foregoing purposes. Or to take any other action related thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Edward “Ned” Chatelain: I move to approve Article Number 11 as printed in the warrant, except delete the reference to “eminent domain” and as funding therefor the sum of $400,000, being a portion of the $10,000,000 previously appropriated as authorized road bond funds as voted Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 11 of 13 pursuant to Article 30 at the May 4, 2015 Annual Town Meeting, shall be utilized, with such amount to be expended at the direction of the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board. ACTION: Adopted by a Moderator declared 2/3 majority. Voter Cards. 10:53pm PRIVATE ROAD BETTERMENT: VESPER POND DRIVE ARTICLE NO. 12: To see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, and/or borrow a sum of money pursuant to MGL Ch. 40, Secs. 7 and 8, Chapter 297 of the Acts of 2002, Chapter 373 of the Acts of 2006, and/or any other enabling authority, said sum to be spent by the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board, to finance temporary road repairs to the private way known as Vesper Pond Drive, including, without limitation, costs associated with engineering, construction, and reconstruction of said way, and costs incidental or related thereto, which costs shall be assessed by the Select Board as a betterment under MGL Ch. 80 Sec. 1 on each parcel within the area benefiting from the improvement, all in compliance Brewster General Bylaws, Section 157-20. Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Two-Thirds Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Kari Hoffmann: I move to finance temporary road repairs to the private ways known as Vesper Pond Drive, Bay View Drive, Cranberry Lane, Mayflower Circle, Deer Path Circle, and Jam Lane, including, without limitation, costs associated with engineering, construction, and reconstruction of said way, and costs incidental or related thereto, said sum to be spent by the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board; and, to meet said appropriation, to authorize the Treasurer, with the approval of the Select Board, to borrow Seven Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Six Dollars ($785,566) under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 44, Section 7, 7(1), 7(5) or 8, Chapter 373 of the Acts of 2006, and/or any other enabling authority, and to issue bonds or notes of the Town therefor; which sum shall be assessed as a betterment under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 80, Section 1 on each parcel within the area benefiting from the improvement, all in compliance with the Brewster Town Code, Chapter 157, Article VIII, Section 157-20. ACTION: Adopted by a Moderator declared 2/3 majority. Voter Cards. 10:09pm CREATION OF NEW REVOLVING FUND: BAY PROPERTY POOL ARTICLE NO. 13: To see if the Town will vote to amend the General Bylaws, Section 21-8, to create a new revolving fund, consistent with MGL Ch. 44 Sec 53E½, for the purposes of managing a recreational pool located at 3057 Main Street, in a manner as follows: Revolving Fund Authority to Spend Use of Fund Fiscal Year Spending Limit Bay Property Pool Department Head - Recreation Expenses shall be related to salaries and operations of the Bay Property Pool and not for any other purposes $200,000 Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Mary Chaffee: I move to approve Article Number 13 as printed in the warrant, with the following language to be added below the chart: “With such spending limits to be applicable for each fiscal year until such time as Town Meeting votes, prior to July 1 for the ensuing fiscal year, to increase the same; provided, however, that in accordance with state law, the Select Board, with the approval of the Finance Committee, may increase the limit for that fiscal year only.” ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 12 of 13 7:51pm BAY PROPERTY POOL FUNDING ARTICLE NO. 14: To see what sums the Town will vote to appropriate from available funds for the initial start- up costs for the operation and maintenance of a community pool at the property located at 3057 Main Street, including the purchase of equipment and supplies, and anything incidental or related thereto. Or take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Mary Chaffee: I move to approve Article Number 14 as printed in the warrant, and as funding therefor to appropriate $200,000 in Free Cash, with the amounts appropriated by this vote to be expended at the direction of the Town Administrator with the approval of the Select Board, and with the expectation that a portion of said funds will be expended in Fiscal Year 2023 and that a portion will be expended in Fiscal Year 2024. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. 9:50pm RESCIND DEBT AUTHORIZATION ARTICLE NO. 15: To see if the Town will vote to repeal or rescind unused borrowing authority authorized by previous Town Meetings, as follows: DEPARTMENT ITEM ARTICLE / TOWN MEETING AMOUNT TO BE RESCINDED DPW Dump Truck Article 10 (2A) of the May 2018 Annual Town Meeting $33,305 Fire Fire Station Article 1 of the November 2015 Special Town Meeting $548,503 Debt North Pond Drive Private Road Betterment Article 16 of the May 2018 Annual Town Meeting $21,276 Debt WH Besse Cartway Land Acquisition (Robinson Property) Article 29 of the May 2018 Annual Town Meeting $155,100 Debt Tri-Town Septic Demolition Article 5 of the December 2018 Special Town Meeting $33,131 DPW Fuel Depot Article 3 of the May 2019 Special Town Meeting $100,000 Or to take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Edward “Ned” Chatelain: I move to approve Article Number 15 as printed in the warrant. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. Town of Brewster Special Town Meeting Report November 14th, 2022 Page 13 of 13 8:17pm LOCAL ELECTION DEADLINES ARTICLE NO. 16: To see if the Town will vote, in accordance with MGL Ch. 41 Sec. 110A, to authorize the Town Clerk’s office to remain closed on all Saturdays and to treat Saturdays as a legal holiday for purposes of calculating the time frame for filing matters in that office. Or take any other action relative thereto. (Select Board) (Majority Vote Required) Motion made by Select Board Member Kari Hoffmann: I move to approve Article Number 16 as printed in the warrant. ACTION: Adopted. Voter Cards. Motion made by Select Board Chair David Whitney: I move to dissolve the 2022 Special Town Meeting. ACTION: Adopted Unanimously. Voter Cards. The November 14th, 2022 Special Town Meeting was dissolved at 10:58pm. A True Copy Attest: Colette M. Williams, MMC/CMMC Town Clerk Brewster, MA Select Board Meeting 12.05.22 1 Agenda Item #17- For Your Information (FYIs) 1.MIIA FY23 Grant Award 2.October 2022 Housing Coordinator Update 3.Resale Memo- 50 Paul Hush Way 4.Department of Public Utilities Notice of Filing and Public Hearing 5.Department of Environmental Protection Notice of Public Hearing- Title 5 and Watershed Permit Regulations 6.Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project Letter 7.Article Regarding Marijuana submitted by a Resident 8.Conservation Commission Applicant – Kimberly Crocker Pearson 9.Pond Parcel Planning Committee- Recreation Commission Appointment 10.Conservation Commission Resignation Letter 11.MassPRIM (Pension Reserves Investment Management) October Reports 12.Comcast Price Changes 13.Resident Feedback a.regarding November 14th Town Meeting b.regarding Wing Island 14.Bennett Environmental Associates – Immediate Response Action Status Report II- 450 Gulls Way 15.Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Free Fare Fridays 16.Eversource Winter Energy Prices- January Increase 17.Historic District Committee Letter to Select Board regarding Meeting Format 18.Bow Hunting in the Punkhorn Parklands website posting 19.Notice to Abutters- 351 Point of Rocks Road 1 Erika Mawn From:nsidikova@mma.org Sent:Thursday, November 10, 2022 11:45 AM To:Conor Kenny; Peter Lombardi Cc:jmitchell@mma.org; jilayne.mitchell@cabotrisk.com; thomas.depaulo@cabotrisk.com; lchabra@mma.org; adecarvalho@mma.org Subject:Your FY23 MIIA Grant Award- Brewster Attachments:GrantStatement.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged November 10, 2022 Dear Member, Congratulations on your MIIA grant award. We are confident that your grant award will assist in your community's ongoing risk management efforts. The FY23 grant criteria focused on property, cyber and safety with respect to your municipality's loss experience. We appreciate all your efforts as you deal with the challenges protecting employees and municipal assets. Thank you for consulting with your Risk Manager to assure that your grant submission met the program guidelines and the needs of your municipality. We did our best to satisfy all of your requests however, working within our $1,000,000 grant budget, with over $1,500,000 in member requests, not all requests could be fully funded. We will be refining the FY24 grant process. Attached to this award letter, is a grant status report detailing the grant(s) submitted by your municipality and for those item(s) approved, the funding that has been provided. Those items not funded will also be listed. If you have been awarded funding for equipment you requested on a FY23 "Equipment Options” form(s): https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.emiia.org%2ffiles%2f2023_risk_management_grant_equipment_o ptions_7-7-22.pdf%2c&c=E,1,Zy4X1w8dwqgxQxburTJcnJFPv0tycCPKnu4SDUB-BiaJBUsq1YEfjfte1iC- _Vw8lgfElvWcjiqhWdGFeVCWRMh1wC0XKiB4OBf8CZ-UlKekAI1-524UYMvaLJ9_&typo=1 which includes Confined Space Equipment, Ladders, Thermographic Cameras, Trenching/ Excavation Equipment and Work Zone Safety Equipment requests, MIIA will order, pay and have the equipment delivered to you. If you were awarded either trench/shoring, confined space or lockout/tagout equipment, per Massachusetts Department of Labor Standards (DLS) requirements, please develop and submit to Kimlee Lindgren (klindgren@mma.org) a written standard operating procedure (SOP) for each. Also, per DLS requirements please include in your submittal documentation verification of employee(s) training on your awarded equipment. If you need assistance in developing the SOP you may consult the DLS Worker Safety and Health Program website at https://www.mass.gov/service-details/safety-programs-for-the-public-sector and/or your MIIA Risk Manager. By submitting your grant invoice(s) as soon as possible, you will provide the maximum benefits to your employees, municipal operations and your community. If at all possible we prefer that you submit vendor invoice(s), with vendor’s W9 for payment instead of requests for reimbursement. Please note that projects, services, and purchases must be completed and invoices submitted to miiagrantinvoices@mma.org by May 12, 2023. 2 We request with the submission of your final grant, that you send us a brief description of how this grant has benefited your risk management efforts and a corresponding picture if possible. Below is a link to a document detailing the grant submittal process for all MIIA grant award invoices. Invoice Process: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.emiia.org%2ffiles%2finvoice_process_fy23.pdf&c=E,1,YLA4pcMM TXuKE9mC6RAd9uPdjOYUT- JJ3eKreqPxFbBxXPnfMdZN11E81uS1EHobWsXFquY89wnt8xECMPVqEryPED8NIf4iqFcHgA1OLXBBFZc,&typo=1 If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to your MIIA Risk Manager, or to Ana De Carvalho, Risk Management Assistant at 774.294.6937, adecarvalho@mma.org, or me. Sincerely, Lin Chabra MIIA Senior Risk Management Manager lchabra@mma.org (617) 838-5941 MIIA Grant Statement $9,741.77Grand Total:$8,941.77 Grant ID Requested Amt Awarded AmtStatusCategory Brewster Department Purpose RM 111 $5,960.67 $5,960.67YesProperty Loss Prevention Equipment: flammable storage cabinets, flammable rag disposal containers, grated ceiling vents, lightning mitigation, moisture meters, low and high (in IT rooms) temperature alarms, sprinkler cages, etc.# Town Administration Wireless Pressure and Temperature Monitor for Dry Barrel Hydrants - 6'0" Clow Medallion iHydrants RM 111 $2,981.10 $2,981.10YesBack Up CamerasTown Administration Automotive Camera System Cameras - Rear View Camera Kit: CMOS, 120 Degree Viewing Angle, 800 x 480 Pixeles, 69k RM 111 $800.00 $0.00NoSlip resistant mats/Anti-fatigue matsTown Administration (5) Hog Heaven Industrial-Grade Anti-Fatigue Mat, OSHA Yellow Striped Border, Welding Safe, Slip Resistant, Grease/Oil Proof, Ergonomic 7/8-inch Mat (Black, 3' x 5') (424-2-5F 3F) Brewster Housing Coordinator Update October 2022 Jill Scalise Ongoing Activities/ Projects 1.Community Outreach and Education (Housing Production Plan (HPP) Strategy #14) Responded to email and phone requests for information and assistance, 77 total requests for housing information (41) or assistance (36). With Donna Kalinick, interview for the Cape Cod Chronicle. Community Housing Forum & Resource Fair held October 27th, Brewster Ladies Library. Collaboration of Housing Partnership & Trust. Outreach to local organizations to participate & community to attend. Website announcement and article in Cape Cod Chronicle. Over 50 attendees. First in-person forum since pandemic. 2.Brewster Affordable Housing Trust (BAHT) (HPP assorted strategies, Select Board (SB) Strategic Plan H-1) Trust met & addressed items throughout update, including approval of 212 Yankee Drive contract. 3.Community Housing Parcel off Millstone (SB Strategic Plan H-4, HPP Strategies #12 & 16) Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH) & Housing Assistance Corporation (HAC) held a Millstone Housing Virtual Information Session October 13th. Provided outreach for session and presented an introduction with background information. Over 40 attendees. Session linked to Housing Office webpage. 4.Redevelop Existing Properties for Affordable Housing (HPP Strategy #5) Serenity at Brewster (55+ rental housing, 27 affordable units): Site visit to meet with property managers. Leasing continued for both market rate and affordable units. 5.Comprehensive Permit Projects (HPP Strategy #16) Brewster Woods (30 affordable rental units): Switchgear arrived & installation began. Documentation started for waitlist applicants. Communication with folks on the lottery wait list and with POAH. Habitat for Humanity Red Top Road (2 affordable homes): Regulatory agreement recorded. 6.Preservation of Housing and Related Support of Brewster Residents (SB H-3, HPP Strategy #20) Regional Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Continue assisting residents with inquiries, grant running smoothly. Recent work includes 2 new septic systems (1 I/A system) and 3 new rooves. Numerous inquiries about Brewster’s rental assistance program. 7.Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) (HPP Strategy #21 & 22) 212 Yankee Drive- Town owned, vacant affordable property o With the guidance from the Trust, the Town contracted with HAC and The Resource Inc.(TRI) for the administration and oversight of the preservation, rehabilitation, affordable resale of the property. o Site visit for initial assessment with Brewster DPW, Administration, HAC & TRI. Continued follow-up on three additional SHI homes of concern, including collaborative meetings, communication with DHCD & outreach to owners. Working with Building, Health, Planning and Administration, created a review process and application for affordable homeowner deed restriction and leasing requests. 8.Housing Production Plan (HPP) (Select Board Strategic Plan Goal H-2) Presented the Housing Plan the at Community Forum. 9.Collaboration (HPP Strategy #7) Met with new outreach workers at Council on Aging to discuss the Housing Program. Participated in HOME Consortium, HAC Pre-Town Meeting round-up, Cape Cod Commission Regional Housing Strategy & Needs Assessment meeting, & CHAPA’s Making the Case call. Personnel Participated in Housing Partnership & Housing Trust meetings. Also worked with: Assessor’s, Building, Council on Aging, Fire, Health, Planning, Public Works, and Town Administration. Attended CDP’s Housing 101, People’s Law Firm Outreach Day & Lessons from the Field: Changing the Narrative on Racial Segregation. Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631-1898 Phone: (508) 896-3701, ext. 1169 Fax: (508) 896-8089 MEMORANDUM TO: Brewster Select Board FROM: Jill Scalise, Housing Coordinator RE: 50 Paul Hush Way, Affordable Home Resale DATE: November 30, 2022 On October 27, 2022, the Town of Brewster received a letter from the homeowners of 50 Paul Hush Way, an SHI home, notifying the Town of their intent to sell the home. The home is subject to an affordable deed rider held by the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) and the Town of Brewster. On November 9, 2022, the Town received the attached notice that DHCD would proceed to locate an income-eligible purchaser of the property pursuant to the affordable deed rider. DHCD has arranged with the Housing Assistance Corporation (HAC) to oversee this process. The procedure and price for resale is delineated in the affordable deed rider. Town Planner Jon Idman, Assistant Town Administrator Donna Kalinick, and Housing Coordinator Jill Scalise have reviewed this resale request. Since DHCD is in the process of identifying an eligible purchaser of the property, the Select Board does not need to take action at this time. The Brewster Housing Office will collaborate with HAC on their marketing efforts to identify of an eligible purchaser for 50 Paul Hush Way. It is expected that marketing will begin within the next month, applications will be submitted, and that an affordable lottery will be held in 2023. Anyone interested in receiving notifications of HAC’s affordable home resales and lotteries can sign up here: Cape Community Real Estate - Housing Assistance Corporation Cape Cod (haconcapecod.org) ENC Office of: Housing Commonwealth of Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Charles D. Baker, Governor • Karyn P. Polito, Lt. Governor • Jennifer D. Maddox, Undersecretary November 3; 2022 Julie and John Davis 50 Paul Hush Way Brewster, MA Re: Right of First Refusal -50 Paul Hush Way, Brewster Dear Ms. Muzerall: The Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) has received your notice of intention to sell your home at 50 Paul Hush Way. This letter is to inform you that, pursuant to the affordable housing deed rider which restricts 50 Paul Hush Way, your property (Deed Rider), DHCD hereby exercises its right of first refusal and is proceeding to locate an eligible purchaser of your property. This period to find an eligible purchaser will expire on February 3, 2023 (90 days from date of this letter). As stated in the Deed Rider: When the Owner shall desire to sell, the Property, the Owner shall notify the Monitoring Agent and the Municipality in writing of the Owner's intention to so convey the Property (the "Conveyance Notice"). Upon receipt of the Conveyance Notice, the Monitoring Agent shall (i) calculate the Maximum Resale Price which the Owner may receive on the sale of the Property based upon the Base Income Number in effect as of the date of the Conveyance Notice and the Resale Price Multiplier set forth in the most recently recorded Resale Price Certificate together with permissible adjustments for the Resale Fee, marketing expenses and Approved Capital Improvements (as discounted), and (ii) promptly begin marketing efforts. The Owner shall fully cooperate with the Monitoring Agent's efforts to locate an Eligible Purchaser and, if so requested by the Monitoring Agent, shall hire a broker selected by the Monitoring Agent to assist in locating an Eligible Purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase the Property at the Maximum Resales Price after entering a purchase and sale agreement. Pursuant to such agreement, sale to the Eligible Purchaser at the Maximum Resale Price shall occur within ninety (90) days after the Monitoring Agent receives the Conveyance Notice or such further time as reasonably requested to arrange for details of closing. If the Owner fails to cooperate in such resale efforts, including a failure to agree to reasonable terms in the purchase and sale agreement, the Monitoring Agent may extend the 90 -day period for a period commensurate with the time the lack of cooperation continues, as determined by the Monitoring Agent in its reasonable discretion. In such event, the Monitoring Agent shall give Owner written notice of the lack of cooperation and the length of the extension added to the 90 -day period. The Monitoring Agent shall ensure that diligent marketing efforts are made to locate an Eligible Purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase the Property at the Maximum Resale Price within the time period provided in 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 300 www.mass.gov/dhcd Boston, Massachusetts 02114 617.573.1100 subsection (a) above and to enter the requisite purchase and sale agreement. If an Eligible Purchaser is located within ninety (90) days after receipt of the Conveyance Notice, but such Eligible Purchaser proves unable to secure mortgage financing so as to be able to complete the purchase of the Property pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, following written notice to Owner within the 90 -day period the Monitoring Agent shall have an additional sixty (60) days to locate another Eligible Purchaser who will enter a purchase and sale agreement and purchase the Property by the end of such sixty (60) -day period or such further time as reasonably requested to carry out the purchase and sale agreement. The sale price of your LIP unit is $201,630. This price was determined by calculating the Maximum Resale Price set forth in the Deed Rider and adding to it the resale fee required by the Deed Rider. The Maximum Resale Price of your unit equals 1.71 (resale multiplier) multiplied by the area median income of a household of 4 for the $115,600 Barnstable HMFA as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, $197,676 (Price to Seller). The Deed Rider requires the new eligible purchaser to pay a 2% resale fee, $3,954 for the cost of marketing your unit. Gael Kelleher of Housing Assistance Corporation will market your unit on behalf of the Town of Brewster and DHCD. Please contact Gael at 508-771-5400 x284 or email her at gkelleherahaconcapecod.org. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please contact Aly Sabatino of DHCD's Housing Di i on at 617-573-1328 Sincerely, Catherine lacer Director cc: Jill Scalise, Housing Director, Brewster Gael Kelleher, HAC The Commonwealth of Massachusetts —— DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES NOTICE OF FILING AND PUBLIC HEARING D.P.U. 22-137 November 4, 2022 Petition of the Cape Light Compact JPE for Approval of a Strategic Electrification and Energy Optimization Demonstration Project Pursuant to St. 2022, c. 179, § 87A. ____________________________________________________________________________ On October 27, 2022, the towns of Aquinnah, Barnstable, Bourne, Brewster, Chatham, Chilmark, Dennis, Eastham, Edgartown, Falmouth, Harwich, Mashpee, Oak Bluffs, Orleans, Provincetown, Sandwich, Tisbury, Truro, Wellfleet, West Tisbury, and Yarmouth, and Dukes County, acting together as the Cape Light Compact JPE (“Compact”) filed a petition with the Department of Public Utilities (“Department”) to implement a strategic electrification and energy optimization demonstration project and associated budget pursuant to St. 2022, c. 179, § 87A, as part of its current 2022-2024 Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plan that was approved by the Department in Cape Light Compact JPE, D.P.U. 21-126 (2022). Through the proposed demonstration project (referred to as the “Cape and Vineyard Electrification Offering” or “CVEO”), the Compact proposes to enable 100 low- and moderate-income residential customers to convert their oil, propane, or electric resistance heat to cold climate heat pumps and install solar photo-voltaic systems to support electrification of their heating systems. For a subset of these customers, the Compact also proposes to install battery energy storage. To implement the CVEO, the Compact proposes a budget of $5,931,509 for 2023 through 2024. The Department has docketed this matter as D.P.U. 22-137. If the Department approves the Compact’s request as proposed, the average residential (R-1) customer using 516 kilowatt-hours (“kWh”) of electricity per month will experience a monthly bill increase of approximately $0.61 in 2023 and $1.49 in 2024. The average low- income residential (R-2) customer using 488 kWh of electricity per month will experience a monthly bill increase of approximately $0.12 in 2023 and $0.29 in 2024. The average residential space heating (R-3) customer using 740 kWh of electricity per month will experience a monthly bill increase of approximately $0.87 in 2023 and $2.14 in 2024. Finally, the average low-income residential space heating (R-4) customer using 874 kWh of electricity per month will experience a monthly bill increase of approximately $0.22 in 2023 and $0.51 in 2024. D.P.U. 22-137 Page 2 Due to certain ongoing safety measures and precautions relating to in-person events as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department will conduct a virtual public hearing to receive comments on the Compact’s filing. The Department will conduct the hearing using Zoom videoconferencing on Wednesday, December 14, 2022, beginning at 2:00 p.m. Attendees can join by entering the link, https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89554093437, from a computer, smartphone, or tablet. No prior software download is required. For audio-only access to the hearings, attendees can dial in at (646) 558-8656 (not toll free) and then enter the Meeting ID# 895 5409 3437. If you anticipate providing comments via Zoom during the public hearing, please send an email by Friday, December 9, 2022, to stephanie.mealey@mass.gov with your name, email address, and mailing address. If you anticipate commenting by telephone, please leave a voicemail message by Friday, December 9, 2022, at (617) 305-3582 with your name, telephone number, and mailing address. Any person interested in commenting on the Compact’s filing may also submit written comments to the Department no later than the close of business (5:00 p.m.) on Wednesday, December 14, 2022. Any person who desires to participate otherwise in the evidentiary phase of this proceeding shall file a petition for leave to intervene no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 17, 2022. A petition for leave to intervene must satisfy the timing and substantive requirements of 220 CMR 1.03. Receipt by the Department, not mailing, constitutes filing and determines whether a petition has been timely filed. A petition filed late may be disallowed as untimely, unless good cause is shown for waiver under 220 CMR 1.01(4). To be allowed, a petition under 220 CMR 1.03(1) must satisfy the standing requirements of G.L. c. 30A, § 10. All responses to petitions to intervene must be filed by the close of business (5:00 p.m.) on the second business day after the petition to intervene was filed. At this time, all filings will be submitted only in electronic format consistent with the Commission’s June 15, 2021 directive related to modified filing requirements. Ordinarily, all parties would follow Sections B.1 and B.4 of the Department’s Standard Ground Rules (D.P.U. 15-184-A, App. 1 (March 4, 2020)); however, until further notice, parties must retain the original paper version and the Department will later determine when the paper version must be filed with the Department Secretary. To the extent a person or entity wishes to submit comments or a petition to intervene in accordance with this Notice, electronic submission, as detailed below, is sufficient. All documents must be submitted to the Department in pdf format by e-mail attachment to dpu.efiling@mass.gov and to stephanie.mealey@mass.gov and sarah.smegal@mass.gov. The text of the e-mail must specify: (1) the docket number of the proceeding (D.P.U. 22-137); (2) the name of the person or company submitting the filing; and (3) a brief descriptive title of the document. The electronic file name should identify the D.P.U. 22-137 Page 3 document but should not exceed 50 characters in length. Importantly, all large files submitted must be broken down into electronic files that do not exceed 20 MB. In addition, one copy of all written comments and petitions to intervene should be emailed to the Compact’s attorney, Audrey Eidelman Kiernan, Esq., at akiernan@kolawpc.com. At this time, a paper copy of the filing will not be available for public viewing at the Compact’s offices or the Department due to certain ongoing safety measures and precautions related to COVID-19. The filing and all other documents submitted in electronic format will be available on the Department’s website through our online File Room as soon as practicable (enter “22-137”) at: https://eeaonline.eea.state.ma.us/DPU/Fileroom/dockets/bynumber. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), contact the Department’s ADA coordinator at DPUADACoordinator@mass.gov. For further information regarding the Compact’s filing, please contact the Compact’s attorney, Audrey Eidelman Kiernan, Esq., at akiernan@kolawpc.com. For further information regarding this Notice, please contact Sarah Smegal or Stephanie Mealey, Hearing Officers, Department of Public Utilities, at sarah.smegal@mass.gov or stephanie.mealey@mass.gov. Charles D. Baker Governor Karyn E. Polito Lieutenant Governor Bethany A. Card Secretary Martin Suuberg Commissioner This information is available in alternate format Contact Glynis Bugg at 617-348-4040. TTY# MassRelay Service 1-800-439-2370 MassDEP Website: www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Title 5 and Watershed Permit Regulations This Public Hearing Notice is available in alternative languages (Español -- Tiếng Việt -- Chinese -- Kreyòl Ayisyen -- Português -- Khmer) on MassDEP's website at: https://www.mass.gov/service- details/massdep-public-hearings-comment-opportunities Notice is hereby given that pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A the Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) is proposing to amend the State Environmental Code, Title 5, 310 CMR 15.000, and promulgate new regulations, titled Watershed Permit Regulations, at 314 CMR 21.00, pursuant to its authority at M.G.L. c. 21A § 13, G.L. c. 21 § 27, and Section 2A of Chapter 259 of the Acts of 2014. MassDEP is proposing to amend the Title 5 regulations to enhance protection of embayments and estuaries—particularly on Cape Cod, the Islands and Southeastern Massachusetts—from nitrogen pollution originating primarily from wastewater. MassDEP’s proposed regulations at 314 CMR 21.00 provide a watershed permitting approach to control nitrogen and other pollutants from entering the embayments and estuaries. The proposed amendments and regulations are available on MassDEP’s website at: https://www.mass.gov/service-details/massdep-public-hearings-comment-opportunities Public Comments and Hearings MassDEP will conduct three public hearings. In-person & Remote, MassDEP, 20 Riverside Dr., Lakeville, MA, November 30, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. Register for remote session in advance at: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_oay0_6bGTjeEUzevfxm7Jg Remote Only, December 1, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. Register in advance at: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_BTOR_A3oSI6EZm56mYdoRw In-person & Remote, Barnstable Town Hall, 367 Main St., Hyannis, MA, December 5, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. Register for remote session in advance at: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_f_YXLbaZRRyJsmdYrtDjNQ After registering for remote sessions, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. You do not need to register in advance to attend either of the hearings in-person. Comments on the proposed revisions may be presented orally at the public hearing. Written comments will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on December 16, 2022. All comments submitted must include the name and contact information of the person providing the comments. Please submit comment by e-mail to dep.talks@mass.gov and include Title 5 & Watershed Permit in the subject line. Written comments may also be submitted by mail and should be sent to MassDEP, Bureau of Water Resources – Division of Watershed Management, One Winter Street, 5th floor, Boston, MA 02108, Attention: Title 5 & Watershed Permit. For special accommodations for these hearings, please call the MassDEP Diversity Office at 617-348- 4040. TTY# MassRelay Service 1-800-439-2370. This information is available in alternate format upon request. MassDEP provides language access interpreter/translation services to limited English proficient individuals free of charge. If you need an interpreter to participate in this meeting, translation services can be found at the following link: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massdep-language-translation- assistance. MassDEP intends to provide Spanish and Portuguese translation at the public hearings. Please provide 72 hours advance notice if additional translation services are requested. By Order of the Department of Environmental Protection Martin Suuberg, Commissioner Telephone: (508) 775-1510 (508) 362-9757 Fax No. (508)362-7917 Gabrielle Sakolsky-Hoopes Superintendent Barton Morris Assistant Superintendent November 9, 2022 Town of Brewster Attn: Peter Lombardi 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 Ike emuswaweedea ixaddae%aaettd .State 'ecdamratiox 'oaul CAPE COD MOSQUITO CONTROL PROJECT 259 WILLOW STREET 2ND FLOOR SUITE 3 YARMOUTH PORT MASSACHUSETTS 02675 Dear Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project Member Community: COMMISSIONERS: J. Gregory Milne, Chairman Rodney Collins, Vice -Chair Arthur Neill, Secretary James H. Quirk Emily Beebe The commissioners of the Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project (CCMCP) would like to make you aware of an unprecedent situation related to the Project's vehicles purchased with Cherry Sheet funds. The State has informed us that several vehicles will be taken from our fleet and auctioned without refund. All of our vehicles are critical to our mission of protecting public health from mosquito -borne diseases. In response to Executive Order 594 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Vehicle Management (OVM) has implemented a fleet rightsizing initiative for fiscal year 2023. Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project along with the other mosquito control districts in the state are the first organizations to be evaluated. Data used for this evaluation and provided by OVM to the CCMCP was found to be inaccurate. Telematics devices, installed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts OVM, were used in the evaluation. The devices were found to be malfunctioning, specialized heavy equipment was included in the survey as if it was used daily, and one truck counted had already been auctioned by the Commonwealth during the period OVM analyzed telematics data. Following data analysis, OVM has determined that CCMCP will need to relinquish trucks to the state. The vehicles identified for redeployment were purchased with funds authorized and funded by your town through cherry sheet local aid to be used for mosquito control in your town. We acknowledge the gravity of climate change and share a commitment to reducing harmful emissions. In fact, the consequences of climate change impact our work of managing mosquitoes by altering the composition and abundance of mosquito populations and increasing the potential for mosquito -borne disease transmission. A reduction in the number of vehicles available for use by MCPs, however, will negatively impact our ability to protect the public health and quality of life on Cape Cod. MCP enabling legislation authorizes our member towns to allocate funds through DOR to be used by the mosquito control projects. As such, we strive to use these funds judiciously and to the greatest benefit to the communities we serve. We firmly believe that a reduction in the number of vehicles we currently utilize will be both a detriment to our mission and a disservice to our member towns, residents, and visitors. Please feel free to reach out to us to discuss this further. J. Gregory Milne, Chairman : Senator S. Moran, Senator J. Cyr, Representative T. Whelan, Representative K. Diggs, Representative D. Vieira, Representative S. Peake, Representative S. Xiarhos, Representative D. Fernandes /10‹...vyi - 6 . , ",f "�," v /R.?.!/: .�.9 9/ " ' ..7"; ' 77 r'• 3 -- 0 9;1,P- • v (-6.77 r7' - G 3 r 2c' 1Z -✓ �� v —,✓A C Study Cites Bad Effects of Marijuana Smoke BY JULIE WERNAU Marijuana might do more damage to smokers than ciga- rettes alone. A study published Tuesday in the journal Radiology dem- onstrated higher rates of condi- tions including emphysema and airway inflammation among people who smoke marijuana than among nonsmokers and people who smoked only to- bacco. Nearly half of the 56 marijuana smokers whose chest scans were reviewed for the study had mucus plugging their airways, a condition that was less common among the other 90 participants who didn't smoke marijuana. "There is a public perception that marijuana is safe and peo- ple think that it's safer than cigarettes," said Giselle Revah, a radiologist who helped con- duct the study at the Ottawa Hospital in Ontario. "This study raises concerns that night not be true." One -fifth of Canadians over 15 years old reported using marijuana in the past three months, according to a 2020 survey of some 16,000 people conducted by Canada's national Smokers who added marijuana to the mix experienced a greater deterioration in lung health. Rates of emphysema for age - matched study participants Marijuana smokers Tobacco -only smokers 67% Nonsmoker/control group Rates of bronchial thickening for study participants Marijuana smokers Tobacco -only smokers 42% Nonsmokericontrol group 11 Nate: The study evaluated results of chest CT scans of 56 marijuana smokers, 57 nonsmoker control patients and 33 tobacco -only smokers. Age -matched group findings are based on 30 marijuana smokers, 29 nonsmoker control patients and 33 tobacco -only smokers. Scans ranged from Oct. 2005 to July 2020. Source: Radiology statistical office. About 18% of Americans re- ported using marijuana at least once in 2020 in the U.S. Sub- stance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra- tion's National Survey of Drug Use and Health, including about one in three young adults age 18 to 25. About one-fourth of people over 12 years old believed there was great harm from smoldng marijuana once or twice a week, according to the survey. Previous studies have found that marijuana is more likely, than tobacco to be smoked un- filtered and that smokers tend to inhale more smoke and hold it in their lungs longer. Bong smoke contains tiny pollutants that can linger indoors for up to 12 hours, a study published in March in JAMA Network Open showed. Among the 56 marijuana smokers in the Ottawa study, 50 also smoked tobacco. The tobacco -only smokers were pa- tients whose chest scans were performed as part of a high- risk lung -cancer screening pro- I gram that included people age 50 and above who had smoked for several years. Marijuana's illicit status long discouraged substantial re- search into the long-term effects of its use, said Albert Rizzo, chief medical officer for the American Lung Association, who wasn't involved in the study. Inhaling any heated sub- stance can irritate airways, among other health dangers, he said. "There could be an addi- tive effect if you smoke ciga- rettes as well as marijuana," Dr. Rizzo said. The study authors found bronchial thickening in 64% of marijuana smokers versus 42% of tobacco -only smokers and a condition that leads to excess mucus buildup in 23% of mari- juana smokers versus 6% of to- bacco -only smokers. Age - matched marijuana smokers had higher rates of emphysema (93%) than tobacco -only smok- ers (67%), and the emphysema, which appears in imaging as small holes in lung tissue, was more prevalent in the mari • - juana smokers, the study found. FINAL Select Bd Appt Policy; version Oct. 28 Appendix C SELECT BOARD COMMITTEE APPLICATION SCREENING FORM Applicant Name Requested Committee 1. TOWN CLERK REVIEW a. Applicant is a registered Brewster voter: Yes No b. Date confirmed 2. SELECT BOARD LIAISON RECOMMENDATION TO SELECT BOARD a. Select Board Liaison Applicant Interview: i. Interviewer name (Select Board Liaison): ii. Interview date: b. Select Board Liaison Consultation with Committee Chair: iii. Committee Chair name: iv. Consultation date: v. Did Committee Chair also interview applicant? Yes No c. Was at least 1 Brewster reference contacted: Yes No N/A d. Select Board Liaison Recommendation: i. Recommend appointment. ii. Recommend appointment to other committee that is a better fit for applicant qualifications. iii. Recommend holding application for future opening. iv. Not recommended. 3. SELECT BOARD ACTION a. At a Select Board meeting held , the Applicant was appointed to for a term ending year term. 4. NOTIFICATION OF APPOINTEE AND TOWN CLERK a. Date notification of appointment sent to appointee and Town Clerk: FINAL Select Bd Appt Policy; version Oct. 28 Appendix B Town of Brewster SELECT BOARD COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT DIRECTIONS:  Thank you for your interest in serving Brewster. The Town aims to match applicants with committee service best aligned to your skills and interests as well as the committee’s needs.  The Town may consider the information in this application, any supplemental information, and any other publicly available information. An appointment to any committee, board or commission is at the discretion of the Select Board.  Please complete this form online, or on paper, and submit a résumé if desired to Erika Mawn, Town Administrator’s Executive Assistant: o Email: EMawn@Brewster-MA.gov o Mail: Erika Mawn, 2198 Main St., Brewster, MA 02631, or o In person: Town Administrator’s Office or drop-box outside Town Hall.  After your application materials are received, you’ll be contacted regarding next steps. Vacancies will be filled by applicants deemed best qualified to serve in a particular capacity, which discretion lies solely with the appointing authority. Submitting this form does not guarantee appointment. 1. Applicant name: 2. Address: 3. Phone Numbers: Home: Cell: 4. Email: 5. This is an application for: Full member status Alternate status 6. Are you a full-time Brewster resident? Yes No 7. Years you’ve lived in Brewster: 8. Are you registered to vote in Brewster? Yes No 9. Committees you are interested in serving on in order of preference: a. b. c. NOTE: You may attach a résumé or CV instead of completing items 10-14. FINAL Select Bd Appt Policy; version Oct. 28 10. EDUCATION. List schools attended, degrees/diplomas/certificates received, and date of completion. Name of School Degree/Diplomas Certificates Date of Completion 11. OCCUPATION: ______________________________________________________ Active Retired Not currently working 12. EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE. List employers, job titles and dates of employment for at least previous 3 years. Name of Employer Job Title Dates of Employment 13. GOVERNMENT POSITIONS. List any Town of Brewster or other government volunteer, elected, or appointed positions you now hold or have held.     14. COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES. List all civic, non-profit, or other organizations that you belong to or have belonged to in the previous 5 years: a. Organizations and dates: 15. GOALS: Please explain why you’d like to serve on a particular committee. 16. EXPERIENCE & SKILLS: Please list any experience, achievements, skills, or interests you have that would assist you to serve effectively on the committee you wish to serve on. 17. TOWN EMPLOYMENT: Are you or any member of your immediate family employed by or receiving financial consideration from the Town of Brewster? Yes No 18. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Do any of your activities or relationships present the possibility or probability of a conflict of interest if you are appointed?(Does not automatically disqualify but may need to be disclosed) Yes No 19. LOCAL REFERENCES: Please provide the names and contact information for references (Brewster residents preferred): 20. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Please add any additional information you’d like. a. Name: Address: Phone: Email: Relationship to you: b. Name: Address: Phone: Email: Relationship to you: FINAL Select Bd Appt Policy; version Oct. 28 20. SIGNATURE. By signing below, you state that you understand and agree.  My completion of this form does not guarantee my appointment and my application will be kept on file for two (2) years.  If appointed to a position, I will be considered a Municipal Employee under MGL Ch. 268A and will be subject to:  Massachusetts Conflict of Interest Law, MGL Ch. 268A;  Massachusetts Financial Disclosure Law, MGL Ch. 268B;  Massachusetts Open Meeting Law, MGL Ch. 30A, Sections 18-25, and the implementing regulations, 940 CMR 29.00;  Massachusetts Public Records Law, MGL Ch. 66, and the implementing regulations, 950 CMR 32.00;  Massachusetts Campaign Finance Law, MGL Ch. 55; and  Brewster Charter, when in force, and Town bylaws, and all other applicable federal, state, and local laws or regulations.  If appointed, I must be sworn in by the Town Clerk before serving, and I will complete State Conflict of Interest training after appointment, as well as any other certifications required by law.  When submitted, I understand that this form becomes a public document. Signature: Date: KIMBERLEY CROCKER PEARSON | Brewster, Massachusetts 02631 |www.linkedin.com/in/kimberley-crocker-pearson Experienced environmental and health professional seeking a position at the intersection of conservation science and policy-making. Recently earned an M.S. in Environmental Science and Policy in addition to prior training and work in occupational and environmental medicine. Extensive experience in teamwork, leadership, and communication strategies, research and data analysis, policy development and implementation in both the public and private sectors. SKILLS Policy Development and Policy Briefing Clinical Medicine Field Research Laboratory Research Team Leadership Media Relations Crisis Communication Personnel Management Budget Development Curriculum Development Non-Profit Development GIS Stata SCUBA Animal Handling EDUCATION AND TRAINING Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD Master of Science Environmental Science and Policy, May 2020 Thesis: “Can Medical Science Teach Conservation Science to Become More Effective?” https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/62822 Massachusetts Poison Control Center,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA Fellow, Medical Toxicology 1993-1998 Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, MA Master of Public Health, May, 1991 Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, MA Occupational and Environmental Medicine Residency and Clinical Research Fellowship, July 1990-June 1992 Chief Resident July 1991-June 1992 Awarded Occupational Physician Scholarship , American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine; ATSDR Clinical Fellowship Program Grant in Environmental Medicine: Research Project: “A survey of non-cancer health effects in a community whose drinking water was contaminated by chlorinated hydrocarbons, particularly tetrachloroethylene.” Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA Internship and Residency, Internal Medicine June 1987-June 1990 Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA Doctor of Medicine, Magna Cum Laude, May, 1987; Awarded Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society; American Medical Women’s Association Scholarship University of California, Los Angeles, CA Master of Science in Geochemistry, May 1984 Thesis: “Stable isotopic investigations of early development in extant and fossil chambered cephalopods I. Oxygen isotopic composition of eggwater and carbon isotopic composition of siphuncle organic matter in Nautilus” Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Geology, May, 1980 Thesis: “A Determination of the Physical Parameters of the Paleoenvironment of an Upper Devonian Fish Fossil Suite from the Catskill Formation, Northeastern Pennsylvania” Awarded Sigma Xi Scientific Research Honor Society PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Board of Health, Brewster, MA Member 2021 - present Natural Resources Commission, Brewster, MA Chair 2021- present ●Advise Select Board and Department of Natural Resources on the sustainable use of natural resources. ●Direct implementation of Coastal Resource Management plan Stellwagen Bank Advisory Council, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA Council Member, Conservation 2020- present ●Advise Sanctuary Superintendent regarding conservation issues relevant to the implementation of the sanctuary management plan. ●Assist in development of the sanctuary management plan. Kirov Academy, Washington, DC Chair, Science Department 2006-2009 ●Designed and implemented science curriculum for Middle and High School students at independent school in Washington, DC. Included curriculum for English language learners. ●Taught 9-12 grade students Chemistry, Biology, Physics and seminar: Science for Citizenship. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Visiting Lecturer 2004-2005 ●Designed and taught International Environmental Health Seminar for graduate students Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment (BEHA), Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA Physician Consultant,2000-2004 ●Responded to citizen concerns about disease excesses (“clusters”) with a multidisciplinary team including toxicologists and risk communication professionals. ●Reviewed national/international criteria documents on physical and chemical hazards and developed policy for implementation of their recommendations at state level. ●Represented BEHA at public meetings as a medical expert; spoke to professional and lay audiences on environmental health hazards and responded to their concerns ●Advised the Bureau Chief on environmental medicine issues ●Reviewed cancer registry and other sentinel health data to evaluate the need for focused environmental health investigations Private Consulting, Boston, MA 2001-2004 ●Consulted with major teaching hospital regarding workplace exposures; developed and piloted a “Collaborative Practice Model” for working with management and labor representatives to achieve common health and safety goals. The model succeeded in minimizing adversarial feelings in the stakeholders and set the stage for an ongoing process of working together on health and safety goals. ●Provided expert testimony for both plaintiff and defendant attorneys in the area of exposure assessment and causation of adverse health effects. ●Designed and implemented an exposure control and response program for the regional American Red Cross employees processing blood and blood products. Logan International Health Center, Logan Airport Boston, Massachusetts Medical Director 1999-2001 ●Supervised all patient care activities at the Center; managed the clinical laboratory, including a forensic drug testing facility, travel health program, maritime health program. ●Provided consultative services for the Central Artery Tunnel Project (“Big Dig”) construction contractors, particularly dealing with use of chemicals in enclosed spaces and injury prevention in heavy construction. Performed safety inspections of worksites. ●Managed 50 employees, developed and tracked the Center ’s budget, worked with marketing to develop new health service product lines to meet market demands, prepared statistical and budgetary reports and presented them to corporate administration. Morton Hospital and Medical Center Taunton, Massachusetts Associate Medical Director, Occupational Health Service 1997-1999 ●Provided Medical care for work-related injuries and illnesses ●Performed worksite walkthroughs evaluating exposures and other risks to employees and developing recommendations for improving worker safety Massachusetts Poison Center, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Poison Center Consultant 1998-2000 ●Performed inpatient and outpatient toxicology consultations on environmental and industrial toxic exposures. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Occupational Health Physician; Director, Employee Health 1994-1996 ●Provided clinical evaluations for employees with symptoms of chemical exposure; developed treatment protocols for hospital staff exposed to chemicals in the various areas of the hospital; designed and conducted safety training related to exposures in the hospital environment. ●Responded on behalf of the hospital to media inquiries, appeared on the US public television science production “NOVA.” ●Represented the hospital on a union-management committee developed to address health and safety issues at the hospital ●Advised hospital president on occupational and environmental health and safety concerns. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Staff Physician, Emergency Department 1990-1994 ●Provided acute care to medical and trauma patients and supervised the house staff, nursing staff and support personnel. ●Chaired the Hospital Disaster Committee; developed and implemented internal and external disaster response plans for the facility Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA Research Assistant 1984-1985 ●Handled and prepared multiple mammalian species for surgical research; assisted with surgeries. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles Graduate Research Assistant, Geochemistry 1980-1983 ●Performed stable isotope analysis, mass spectroscopy,geologic and paleontologic field work Carr Research, Inc., Wellesley, Massachusetts Research Assistant 1979 ●Performed water quality assessment of ponds and streams including biological and hydrological field and laboratory work. New England Aquarium Boston, MA Curatorial Assistant 1977-1979 ●Cared for marine mammals in captivity; participated in marine mammal rescue and rehabilitation. collected biological and behavioral data for research studies. PUBLICATIONS Original Reports: Pearson, KC “Will Culling the Northwest Atlantic Gray Seal Population, Halichoerus grypus (Fabricius, 1791) (Carnivora: Phocidae) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Reduce the Risk of Human-White Shark Encounters?” Life: The Excitement of Biology 2018;6(3):75-107.https://blaypublishers.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/pearson-leb63.pdf Brotschi, EA,Crocker, KC, Gianitsos, A, Williams,LF, Jr. Low extracellular Ca+2 products agonist-specific alterations in gallbladder contractility. Gastroenterology 1986; 88(5); 1336. Crocker, KC, DeNiro, MJ, Ward, PD. Stable isotopic investigations of early development in extant and fossil chambered cephalopods 1. Oxygen isotopic composition of eggwater and carbon isotopic composition of siphuncle organic matter in Nautilus. Geochemica et Cosmochemica Acta 1985; 49: 2527-2532. Abstracts Pearson, KC. Sensitization to UV-curable acrylates:A case report and review of the literature. North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology Annual Meeting. In: J Tox Clin Tox 2002: 40(5): 192. Pearson, K, Woolf, A. Two cases of self-poisoning with lead in patients with psychiatric illness. North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology Annual Meeting. In: J Tox Clin Tox 1998; 36(5): 494. Woolf, A,Pearson, K. Presence of diethylene glycol in commercial polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology Annual Meeting. In: J Tox Clin Tox 1995; 33(5): 490. Du Buske, M, Babakhin, AA, Cicslewicz, G, Nolte, H, Skov, P, Zakirova, I,Pearson, K, Sheffer, AL. Comparison of Pharmacia CAP and whole blood leukocyte histamine release in the detection of sensitivity to latex. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Annual Meeting. 1996. Anderson, G, Li, T, Malki, I, Patel, A, Alem, M, Babakhin, AA, Cieslewicz, G, Zakirova, I, Nolte, R,Pearson,K, Scheffer, AL, and Du Buske, LM. Assessment by Hycor RAST and Pharmacia CAP of cross sensitization to banana and avocado among latex sensitive hospital employees. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Annual Meeting. 1996 Texts “Chapter 75: Chlorinated Hydrocarbons”in Haddad,Winchester and Shannon.Clinical Management of Poisonings.3rd Edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 1998 pp 931-939. November 6, 2022 Letter of interest for appointment to Pond Committee To the Brewster Select Board members: I am presenting this in anticipation of being appointed as the Recreation Commission’s voting member to the Pond Committee. In our committee’s most recent meeting (10/27) I excepted the nomination and was voted to be the Recreation Commission’s voting representative to the Brewster Pond Committee. As a lifelong resident of the town of Brewster, it comes with great pride to be nominated for this committee. Most of my childhood was spent taking part in many of the same events/programs that I now watch my 3 children take part in. I have been an elected member of the Brewster Recreation Commission for over 10 years. In the past 10 years I have volunteered my time as a coach or Board member in baseball, softball, basketball, and football. My involvement has ranged from Rec level up to Sr Babe Ruth. Four generations of my family have been able to benefit from the strong sense of community that is part of “being a Brewster resident”. As a member of the Pond Committee, I look forward to working with the other committee members to search out and discuss responsible uses for this wonderful property. As a self-employed carpenter, I feel that I have the flexibility to dedicate ample time to this appointment. I look forward to hearing from the Select Board after the appointment process. Respectfully, Allen J. Ryone TOWN OF BREWSTER 1657 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MA 02631 PHONE: (508) 896-4546 BREWSTER-MA.GOV November 3, 2022 Brewster Select Board 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 OFFICE OF THE CONSERVATION COMMISSION Re: Peter Wells Resignation from the Conservation Commission To whom it may concern, It is with regret that I must resign from the Conservation Commission, effective November 3, 2022. It has been a pleasure serving on the Commission. Respectfully, Peter Wells Commissioner L By _ ,,p,, T 9: T T . 0 7 20 NAV $ (000) Target Allocation Range Actual Allocation % Month FY '23 Calendar YTD 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year Since Inception GLOBAL EQUITY 33,839,966 33 - 43% 37.5% 6.00 -1.04 -21.19 -20.14 4.95 5.10 8.31 6.02 CORE FIXED INCOME 12,253,035 12 - 18% 13.6% -2.14 -8.17 -20.56 -20.11 -4.05 -0.02 1.77 6.38 VALUE ADDED FIXED INCOME *6,248,036 5 - 11% 6.9% 1.03 0.22 -7.20 -6.59 3.28 3.83 4.28 7.29 PRIVATE EQUITY *16,174,611 12 - 18% 17.9% 0.08 -5.62 -4.17 3.92 27.41 24.18 21.52 16.00 REAL ESTATE *9,850,566 7 - 13% 10.9% 0.56 0.42 9.17 16.65 12.92 11.17 11.12 7.21 TIMBERLAND *2,866,276 1 - 7% 3.2% -0.07 0.05 4.44 11.05 5.60 5.10 6.26 8.06 PORTFOLIO COMPLETION STRATEGIES *7,877,020 7 - 13% 8.7% 0.17 -0.27 -2.65 -2.10 2.63 2.78 4.22 4.09 OVERLAY 972,953 0.0% 1.1% 2.12 -2.39 -13.92 -13.93 2.59 2.11 3.70 TOTAL CORE 90,122,824 100% 100% 2.05 -2.63 -12.63 -10.17 6.95 6.91 8.42 9.17 2.08 -2.13 -11.19 -9.26 6.60 6.70 7.82 9.50 TOTAL CORE BENCHMARK (using private equity) 2 2.27 -0.49 -9.42 -8.09 4.95 5.49 6.90 9.23 PARTICIPANTS CASH 48,802 0.26 0.82 1.01 1.03 0.64 1.24 0.82 3.44 TEACHERS' AND EMPLOYEES' CASH 28,561 0.25 0.79 0.98 0.99 0.64 1.23 0.81 2.30 TOTAL FUND 90,200,186 2.05 -2.63 -12.59 -10.14 6.93 6.89 8.39 9.21 PENSION RESERVES INVESTMENT TRUST * Certain Value-Added Fixed Income investments, Private Equity, certain Real Estate investments, Timberland, and certain Portfolio Completion Strategy investments are valued only at calendar quarter ends (March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31). Periods Ending October 31, 2022* RATES OF RETURN (GROSS OF FEES) SUMMARY OF PLAN PERFORMANCE IMPLEMENTATION BENCHMARK (using short term private equity benchmark) 1 3 IMassPRIM Pension Reserves Investment Management Board 84 State Street, Suite 250 Deborah B. Goldberg, Treasurer and Receiver General, Chair Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Michael G. Trotsky, CFA, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer Town of Brewster State Retirees Benefits Trust Fund October 01, 2022 to October 31, 2022 Your beginning net asset value for the period was: Your change in investment value for the period was: Your exchanges from (to) the Cash Fund for the period were: Your ending net asset value for the period was: Month To Date 3,138,760.21 65,225.38 0.00 3,203,985.59 Net Change in Investment Value represents the net change through investment activities as follows: Gross Investment Income: 3,897.77 Less Management Fees: (607.24) Net Investment Income: 3,290.53 Net Fund Unrealized Gains/Losses: 63,425.42 Net Fund Realized Gains/Losses: (1,490.57) Net Change in Investment Value as Above: 65,225.38 Fiscal Year To Date Calendar Year To Date 3,294,393.09 (90,407.50) 0.00 3,691,196.18 (487,210.59) 0.00 3,203,985.59 3,203,985.59 27,137.54 (4,690.29) 72,914.72 (14,308.02) 22,447.25 58,606.70 (119,854.05) 6,999.30 (573,196.21) 27,378.92 (90,407.50) (487,210.59) As of October 31, 2022 the net asset value of your investment in the SRBT Fund was: If you have any questions regarding your statement, please contact the Client Services team at clientservice@mapension.com. A detailed statement of your account is attached to this summary sheet. $3,203,985.59 MassPRft� Pension Reserves Investment Manal =ment Board 84 State Street, Suite 250 Deborah B. Goldberg, Treasurer and Receiver General, Chair Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Michael G. Trotsky, CFA, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer Town of Brewster Cash Investment October 01, 2022 to October 31, 2022 Your beginning net asset value for the period was: Your investment income for the period was: Your total contributions for the period were: Your total redemptions for the period were: Your total exchanges for the period were: Your state appropriations for the period were: Your ending net asset value for the period was: Month To Date Fiscal Year To Date Calendar Year To Date 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 As of October 31, 2022 the net asset value of your investment in the Cash Fund was: If you have any questions regarding your statement, please contact the Client Services team at cliantservice@mapension.com. A detailed statement of your account is attached to this summary sheet. $0.00 IMassPRIM Pension Reserves Investment Management Board 84 State Street, Suite 250 Deborah B. Goldberg, Treasurer and Receiver General, Chair Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Michael G. Trotsky, CFA, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer PHTF90200002 Commonwealth Of Massachusetts Town of Brewster Investment Detail 10/31/2022 Investments Units Of Participation Cost Price Market Value Unrealized Gain/Loss 13,310.802 HCST OPEB MASTER TRUST 3,259,753.64 240.7057 3,203,985.59 -55,768.05 Total Investment: 3,259,753.64 3,203,985.59 -55,768.05 IMassPR in Pension Reserves Investment Mana;ement Board 84 State Street, Suite 250 Deborah B. Goldberg, Treasurer and Receiver General, Chair Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Michael G. Trotsky, CFA, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer PHTF90200002 Commonwealth Of Massachusetts NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF PERIOD DISBURSEMENTS: CASH FUND EXCHANGES RECEIPTS: CONTRIBUTIONS: PARTICIPANTS INVESTMENT INCOME: UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS-INVESTMENT MASTER TRUST ALLOCATED EXPENSES MASTER TRUST CHANGE IN REALIZED G/L MASTER TRUST INVESTMENT INCOME MT ALL INVESTMENT MANAGER FEES UNIT EXCHANGES Town of Brewster Statement of Change In Net Assets 10/31/2022 Total Receipts Total Disbursements: Net Assets - End of Period: Current Period 10/1/2022 10/31/2022 3,138,760.21 Fiscal Year Year To Date 7/1/2022 10/31/2022 1/1/2022 10/31/2022 3,294,393.09 3,691,196.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,425.42 -94.09 -1,490.57 3,897.77 -513.15 -119,854.05 -573,196.21 -780.00 -2,042.61 6,999.30 27,378.92 27,137.54 72, 914.72 -3,910.29 -12,265.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,225.38 -90,407.50 -487,210.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,233,985.59 3,203,985.59 3,203,985.59 STATEMENT EXPLANATION Below you will find a description of each item posted to your statement. CAPITAL ACCOUNT Summary of Account Activity: Your beginning net asset value for the period: Your change in investment value for the period: Your total exchanges from (to) cash fund: Your ending net asset value for the period: Gross investment income: Management fees: Net investment income: Net fund unrealized gains/losses: Net fund realized gains/losses: CASH FUND Your beginning net asset value for the period: Your investment income for the period: Your total contributions for the period: Your total redemptions for the period: Your ending net asset value for the period: A summary statement produced for your investment in the State Retiree Benefits Trust Fund (SRBTF) includes both month -to - date and fiscal year-to-date information. This statement is also furnished to the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC). The total balance of your investment as of the opening date of the statement period. The total increase or decrease in your investment includes net investment income, realized gains or losses, and unrealized gains or losses. Movement of funds occurring on the first business day of each month between your Cash Fund and Capital Account (SRBTF). The total balance of your investment as of the closing date of the statement period. Represents your allocable share of the SRBTF's income associated with securities and other investments (i.e. real estate), except for realized and unrealized gains or losses. It is principally interest, dividends, real estate income, and private equity income. Represents your allocable share of the SRBTF's expenses related to PRIM's investment advisors, consultants, custodian and operations expenses. Represents your allocable share of the SRBTF's gross investment income, less Management Fees. Represents your allocable share of the SRBTF's increase or decrease in value, attributed to a change in value of securities or other investments held in the PRIT Fund, relative to original cost. These gains or losses are "unrealized" because the investments have not yet been sold. Represents your allocable share of the SRBTF's increase or decrease in value attributed to the PRIT Fund's sale of securities or other investments (i.e. real estate property). Whether you "realize" a gain or loss depends upon the price at which the investment was sold in relation to its original purchase price. The total balance of your investment as of the opening date of the statement period. Interest earned for the period. Sum of all funds (i.e. wires and/or checks) sent into your SRBTF account during the statement period. Cash contributed any day during the month except the first business day will remain in your Cash Fund until the first business day of the following month, when it will then be exchanged into the General Allocation Account (SRBTF). Sum of all funds sent by wire from the FRIT Fund's custodian bank to your government entity during the statement period. A redemption made be made at any time throughout the month as long as your Cash Fund balance equals or exceeds the amount you wish to redeem. The total balance of your investment as of the closing date of the statement period. If you have any questions regarding your statement, please contact the Client Services team at clientservice@mapension.com. a►. COMCAST November 18, 2022 Select Board Town of Brewster 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 RE: Important Information —Price Changes Dear Members of the Board: At Comcast, we are always committed to delivering the entertainment and services that matter most to our customers in your community, as well as exciting experiences they won't find anywhere else. We are also focused on making our network stronger in order to meet our customers' current needs and future demands. As we continue to invest in our network, products, and services, the cost of doing business rises. Rising programming costs, most notably for broadcast TV and sports, continue to be the biggest factors driving price increases. While we absorb some of these costs, these fee increases affect service pricing. As a result, starting December 20, 2022, prices for certain services and fees will be increasing, including the Broadcast TV Fee and the Regional Sports Network Fee. Enclosed are the notices customers will receive within their bill starting November 20, 2022. We know you may have questions about these changes. If I can be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me via email at Michael_Galla@comcast.com. Sincerely, mizkael, calla Michael Galla, Sr. Manager Government & Regulatory Affairs Enclosures: Customer Notices xfinity Important information regarding your Xfinity services and pricing Effective December 20, 2022 Xfinity TV Current New Limited Basic Truro $21.00 $22.00 Broadcast TV Fee $22.25 $24.70 Regional Sports Fee $14.10 $14.45 Franchise Costs Brewster $0.17 $0.51 Mashpee $0.62 $0.66 Truro $0.37 $0.39 Choice TV Select $32.50 $37.50 Choice TV Select - with TV Box $41.00 $47.50 Service to Additional TV with TV Adapter S8.50 $10.00 TV Box and Remote $8.50 $10.00 HD TV Box and Remote Limited Basic $8.50 $10.00 Pay -Per -View and On Demand Subscription Services Current New Acorn TV On Demand $5.99 $6.99 Installation Current New In -Home Service Visit - After Initial Installation of Service 570.00 $100.00 Xfinity Internet Current New Modem Rental $14.00 $15.00 Brewster, Mashpee, Truro, MA 87731000 (2630,2650,2680) P188AL23 Important Information -Price Changes December 20, 2022 Additional Information In addition to the price changes listed in the attached general Important Information Regarding Xfinity Services and Pricing, customers subscribing to the services below will receive a bill message regarding the pricing change to their service. Bill Message Text: "In addition to the price changes listed on the general Important Information Regarding Xfinity Services and Pricing, on December 20, 2022, the price of [package or service name from below] will increase from $XX.XX to $XX.XX per month. Prices exclude taxes and fees." SERVICES NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR NEW SUBSCRIPTIONS Current New Digital Preferred Tier Choice Limited TV Digital Preferred Package Digital Preferred Tier with Showtime Digital Preferred Tier with The Movie Channel Digital Preferred Tier with Cinemax Digital Preferred Tier With HBO Max Choice Triple Play Standard+ More Triple Play $17.95 $30.00 $85.22 $ 29.95 $20.00 $35.00 $87.27 $32.00 $29.95 $32.00 $29.95 $32.00 Economy Double Play $32.94 $34.99 Select Double Play $99.99 $100.99 Signature Double Play $130.99 $131.99 Super Double Play SERVICES NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR NEW SUBSCRIPTIONS Cont. Current New Standard+ Double Play Select+ Double Play Signature+ Double Play Super+ Double Play $110.99 $139.99 $169.99 $189.99 $114.99 $141.99 $171.99 $191.99 Select+ More Triple Play $159.99 Signature+ More Triple Play Super+ More Triple Play Preferred Triple Play (MDU) Preferred Extra Triple Play Preferred & Internet Pkg (MDU) $91.89 $99.99 $119.99 $139.99 $169.99 $94.89 $102.99 $122.99 $142.99 $172.99 $160.99 Blast! Plus Double Play with HBO Max $109.99 $112.99 $189.99 $190.99 Internet Pro Plus Double Play with HBO Max $94.99 $97.99 $199.99 $201.99 Internet Pro Plus Double Play with Showtime $91.99 $94.99 Premier Double Play with Performance Pro Int $189.99 $192.99 Internet Plus Latino Double Play $87.99 $90.99 $117.99 $120.99 $129.99 $132.99 Select Triple Play Signature Triple Play Super Triple Play HD Extra Bundle HD Plus Triple Play Value Plus Triple Play MultiLatino Ultra Triple Play MultiLatino Ultra Bundle MultiLatino Ultra HD Triple Play MultiLatino HD Ultra Plus MultiLatino Ultra Plus Extra XF Bundle Preferred XF Bundle $149.99 $169.99 $199.99 $162.99 $187.99 $142.99 $162.99 $162.99 $172.99 $192.99 $192.99 $154.99 $167.99 $151.99 $171.99 $201.99 $165.99 $190.99 $145.99 $165.99 $165.99 $175.99 $195.99 $195.99 $157.99 $170.99 Internet Plus Double Play with Showtime Blast! Extra Double Play Blast! Plus Double Play Preferred Double Play Multilatino Double Play Internet Plus Double Play with HBO Preferred Latino Double Play Performance Internet Gigabit Pro Internet Gigabit x2 Internet Performance Starter Internet Desi Pack Modem Rental $81.99 $92.99 $102.99 $151.99 $136.99 $87.99 $169.99 $64.95 $299.95 $129.95 $59.95 $29.99 $14.00 $84.99 $95.99 $105.99 $154.99 $139.99 $90.99 $172.99 $67.00 $300.00 $130.00 $65.00 $32.99 $15.00 Important Information - Price Changes December 20, 2022 Additional Information Continued SERVICES NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR NEW SUBSCRIPTIONS Current New PREMIER TIER W/SPORTS $ 59.95 $ 62.00 DIGITAL PREMIER TIER WITH SPORTS $ 63.95 $ 66.00 DIGITAL PREMIER TIER $ 64.95 $ 67.00 TOTAL PREMIUM $ 64.95 $ 67.00 PERFORMANCE INTERNET & VOICE $ 109.90 $ 111.95 DIGITAL PREMIER WITH SPORTS AND 4 PREMIUM CHANNELS 127.22 129.27 DOUBLE PLAY BUNDLE WITH BLAST! INTERNET & VOICE 129.90 $ 131.95 DIGITAL PREMIER WITH SPORTS AND 5 PREMIUM CHANNELS 131.22 133.27 DIGITAL PREMIER PACKAGE WITH 5 PREMIUM CHANNELS 132.22 134.27 EXTRA XF DOUBLE PLAY 132.22 134.27 VALUE PLUS TRIPLE PLAY WITH UNLIMITED VOICE $ 142.99 $ 137.17 UN0000188 - Brewster, MA Archived: Monday, November 21, 2022 10:57:26 AM From: Annie Dugan Sent: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:46:20 To: Peter Lombardi; Cynthia Bingham; David Whitney; Ned Chatelain; Mary Chaffee; Kari Hoffman Subject: 11/14/22 Town Meeting Sensitivity: Normal ___________________________________ To each of the above addressees, may I submit my displeasure at having to tolerate, once again, an otherwise professionally orchestrated Fall, 2022 Town Meeting, except for the rampant disrespect and abuse of Brewster residents’ time and patience demonstrated by the same individual that compromised the tenor of the Spring, 2022 Town Meeting. While I noted specific individuals who had no choice but to sit for five hours and listen to mostly nonsensical and in one case accusatory (a similar insulting comment was directed at the Town Administrator in Spring, 2022) comments, I realized that health issues related to prolonged sitting could possibly result in a poor outcome. I urge you to look at potential solutions to this abuse of residents’ time and good will. Twenty six times (by my count) at the microphone , for sixteen articles is excessive and unnecessary. Town meetings have serious business to resolve that takes time and debate, but five hours is beyond reasonable. Thank you all very much for putting in the effort and time it takes to bring these meetings to fruition. I feel confident that there is a satisfactory solution in your capable hands. Respectfully, Annie Campbell Dugan 173 Beach Plum Lane Brewster MA 02631 508-284-6515 Archive d: Monday, November 28, 2022 8:41:42 AM From: Donna Kalinick Se nt: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 19:53:37 +0000Authentication To: Erika Mawn Subje ct: FW: On Behalf Of Wing Island Se ns itivity: Normal Please put in the ne xt FYI. thanks, Donna From: Donna Kal i ni ck On Behalf Of Peter Lombardi Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 2:53 PM To: Susan Goodspeed <susan.goodspeed53@gmail.com> Subject: RE: On Behal f Of Wing Island Thank you for your correspondence. Select Board members cannot reply to thi s emai l because it woul d be a violation of the open me e ting law. Your emai l wi l l be put i n the De ce mbe r 5th Sel ect Board publi c packet as an FYI. Pl e ase feel fre e to re ach out to me if you have any que stions. Sincere l y, Donna Donna J. Kalinick Assi stant Town Admi ni strator Town of Brewster 508-896-3701 X1100 Town Offi ce s are curre ntly open Mon-Thursday, 8:30am to 4pm and Fri days by appoi ntment. For further details, please vi si t our website at www.bre wste r- ma.gov. From: Susan Goodspe e d <susan.goodspeed53@gmai l .com> Sent: Saturday, Nove mbe r 26, 2022 3:11 PM To: Pete r Lombardi <pl ombardi @brewster-ma.gov>; Cynthi a Bi ngham <cbi ngham@bre wste r-ma.gov>; David Whitney <dwhi tney@bre wste r-ma.gov>; Ned Chatelai n <nchate l ain@brewster-ma.gov>; Mary Chaff e e <mchaffee@brewster-ma.gov>; Kari Hoffmann <khoffmann@bre wste r-ma.gov> Subject: On Behal f Of Wing Island Dear Brewster Select Board, A c ouple of days after the November 14th Town m eeting, tide willing, I made m y way out to W ing Island. The sweeping view ac ross the m arsh was beautiful and unfettered. The narrow footpath across the island was pristine and the vista overlooking the bay was stunning. The coast there was clean and undisturbed as were the waters flowing from Quivett Creek. A few fellow s trollers, who had consulted the Brewster tide chart as well, were visible in the distance, mindful, as was I, that time on this partic ular stretc h of s horeline was limited. Have you walked this path? I wonder how the Brewster Select Board could pos s ibly think elevated boardwalks allowing constant access would be good for this fragile plac e. Have you visited a beach early in the morning or at day's end? On any given day, year round but especially during the sum mer, you will find any number of things left behind. There is often enough to fill a tras h bag or two or three every day. Brewster Select Board, Becom e a friend of W ing Island. Preserve it. W alk the path. Sinc erely, Susan Goods peed susan.goodspeed53@gmail.com 2090 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 (407) 929-2442 BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC. A NATURAL SYSTEMS UTILITIES COMPANY LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS * ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS * ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 * 508-896-1706 * Fax 508-896-5106 * www.bennett-ea.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Ray Reimold, Case Officer MA DEPART. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Emergency Response Section / BWSC 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 SHIPPING METHOD: Regular Mail Mail Express Mail Certified Mail E Pick Up Priority Hand Deliver Other UPLOAD ❑ Green Card/RR DATE: 11/18/22 REGARDING: JOB NUMBER: K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS REPORT II 450 Gulls Way- Brewster, MA RTN 4-29181 COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 11/14/22 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS REPORT II *As part of Public Notice requirements, the report Title Page, Narrative, Index, Transmittal forms and Site Plan are included, pursuant to paperwork reduction policy. The full report is available as public record on the MA DEP website database at http://public.dep.state.ma.us/SearchableSites2/Search.aspx or, upon written request to BEA, full copy (electronic or paper) will be provided. For review and comment: ❑ For approval: ❑ REMARKS: As requested: 0 For your use: 0 Cc: via email: Daniel Cahill - Homeowner via Certified Mail/ Return Receipt: Chief Robert Moran- Brewster Fire Department* Amy von Hone, Director - Brewster Health Department* Noelle Aguiar, Administrator - Brewster Conservation Department* Peter Lombardi, Town Administrator - Town of Brewster* FROM: John Tadema-Wielandt, Manager of Environmental Services/Stephen Lee, Project Manager/ Diane Kyle Admin. Assist. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC. A NATURAL SYSTEMS UTILITIES COMPANY LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 6 GEOLOGISTS 6 ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 6 508-896-1706 6 Fax 508-896-5109 6 www.bennett-ea.com Job # K11428 November 14, 2022 Ray Reimold, Case Officer MA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (MA DEP) Southeast Regional Office (SERO) Emergency Response Section/Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC) 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 RE: IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS REPORT II Residential Property, RTN 4-29181 450 Gulls Way — Brewster, MA Dear Mr. Reimold, On behalf of our clients, Daniel and Lisa Cahill, BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC (BEA) has prepared the enclosed Immediate Response Action Status in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 40.0425. The IRA Status Report with Supporting Documentations, including the applicable Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (BWSC) Transmittal Form BWSC-105, has been filed electronically, via the eDEP online filing system. If you have any questions, please contact me directly. Sincerely, B I ETT EN N ENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC n D. ad ma- - an•', LSP Stephen Lee nager of Environmental Services Project Manager Enclosure Cc: Daniel Cahill, Homeowner Chief Robert Moran — Brewster Fire Department1 Amy von Hone, Director — Brewster Health Department' Noelle Aguiar, Administrator — Brewster Conservation Department' Peter Lombardi, Town Administrator —Town of Brewster' 1 As part of Public Notice requirements, the report Cover Letter, Narrative, Transmittal forms and Site Plan are included, pursuant to paperwork reduction policy. The full report is available as public record on the MA DEP website database at https://eeaonline.eea.state.ma.us/portal#!/search/wastesite or, upon written request to BEA, full copy (electronic or paper) will be provided. EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE 6 WASTE SITE CLEANUP 6 SITE ASSESSMENT 6 PERMITTING 0 SEPTIC DESIGN & INSPECTION DESIGN BUILD 6 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 6 WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT 6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 6 FIELD SERVICES IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS REPORT II WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION RTN 4-29181 Residential Property 450 Gulls Way Brewster, MA Job# K11428 November 14, 2022 BEA BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC. • ASSESSMENT • REMEDIATION • RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 1EOLOGISTS ' .ENGINEERS 1573 Main Street, Brewster, MA 02631 i 508.896-1706,: Fax 508-896-5109 :evvt;.lbennett-ea.! owl TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS REPORT 1 2.1 Status of Assessment and/or Remedial Actions 1 2.2 Significant New Site Information or Data 3 2.3 Plans for Remedial Waste, Wastewater and/or Remedial Additives 7 2.4 Other Information Required by the Department 7 2.5 LSP Opinion 8 PLANS "Immediate Response Action Status II..." Prepared by BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC., Dated November 10, 2022. APPENDICES A Reference Maps Figure 1: Site Locus Plan [USGS Topographic Quad., Harwich, MA, 2021] (excerpt) Figure 2: Ground -Water Resources of the Cape Cod, MA... LeBlanc et al, 1986] (excerpt) Figure 3: MassDEP Phase I Site Assessment Map [2022] B Field Reports Inspectors Daily Record of Work Progress [#3 (8/24/22) to #17 (11/10/22)] Monitoring Well Sampling Logs [8/24/22, 10/17/22, 11/8/ 22] C Environmental Records/Permits/Correspondence BWSC-105: Immediate Response Action Transmittal Form BWSC-112: Bill of Lading BWSC-120: Homeowner Certification Form Weight slips from disposal facility D Laboratory Analytical Reports NETLAB WO# 2H24037 (8/31/22) — Groundwater NETLAB WO# 2128017 (11/11/22) — Soil Endpoints Zones A & B E Quality Assurance -Quality Control Plan NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 1 OF 8 CAHILL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 1.0 INTRODUCTION BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC. (BEA), on behalf of our client Daniel Cahill, has prepared the following Immediate Response Action Status (IRAS) and Remedial Monitoring report, in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0425, for the property located at 450 Gulls Way in Brewster, MA. This filing is related to the sudden release of #2 fuel oil from a defective return line for the two 275 -gallon aboveground storage tanks (AST) in a semi -enclosed, basement -level storage room, as discovered on January 23, 2022. Originally, the release was estimated at 100 gallons. Based on estimated recovery and fuel use, however, the release appears to be closer to 50 gallons +/-. This submittal presents a summary of Immediate Response Actions conducted since submitting the previous IRA Status Report on May 20, 2022. 2.0 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS REPORT 2.1 Status of Assessment and/or Remedial Actions Proposals for the scope of work were requested from three qualified contractors. Subsequent to the receipt and review of these proposals, Dowling Corporation, Inc. was selected, and authorized to perform the work on August 15, 2022. Dowling Corp. subsequently contacted their shoring contractor for scheduling and began the permitting process with the Town of Brewster. Quarterly groundwater monitoring was conducted on August 24, and November 8, 2022. Groundwater samples were collected for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) and target polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) analysis, as well as volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) and target benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) analysis. Groundwater sampling results are presented in Section 2.2 below. Dowling Corp. personnel began mobilizing equipment and materials to the site the first week in October. On October 5 and 6, 2022, BEA conducted hand borings HB-3A, HB-7, HB-8, and HB-9 in the area beneath the basement storage area (Zone B) to confirm the limits of significant impact for proper placement of the timber shoring box. Field screening data for these borings is presented in Table 2 in Section 2.2 below. The piers specified for structural shoring were installed the week of October 17, 2022. Soil removal work began the following week on October 24, 2022, using a vactor truck. BEA personnel were on -site to oversee and direct soil removal activities using a photoionization detector (PID) and Dexsil° PetroFlag® test kit to field screen soils. Soil removal began inside the basement -level storage room and progressed from west to east. Soils were removed from the western portion of the room to 2' below grade, shown as Zone A on the enclosed site plan. Dowling personnel then began excavating soils from the eastern portion of the storage room to facilitate the construction of a shoring box in order to advance Zone B to depth. Soil removal from Zone A and Zone B was completed on October 27, 2022. Field screening results are presented in Tables 3 and 4 in Section 2.2. NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 2 OF 8 CAHILL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 Photo 1: Soil removal in storage room Zone A in background, Zone B in foreground. On November 3, 2022, Dowling personnel excavated the top six feet of soils in the area of proposed soil removal (Zone C) east of the dwelling. On November 4, 2022, BEA conducted hand borings HB-11 and HB-12 to confirm the limits of significant impact for proper placement of the trench box. The 12' x 8' trench box was installed later that day. Soil removal activities recommenced and concluded on November 7, 2022. On November 8, 2022, soil samples were collected from the limits of soil removal by advancing hand borings beyond the sides of the trench box. Field screening data for these borings is presented in Table 5 in Section 2.2 below. Upon completing excavation activities in Zone C, 560 lbs. of RegenOx® Part A was mixed into soils in the bottom of the excavation. The excavation was then partially-backfilled with 3/4" aggregate and a PVC infiltration system consisting of 4" perforated PVC pipe was installed. The p infiltration system was installed as a contingency to treat residual soil impact in bottom -of -hole soils if laboratory analytical results indicate additional treatment is needed. The trench box was then removed and the excavation backfilled with stone and capped with dense grade road base. Photo 2: Zone C upon completion of soil removal activities. NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 3 OF 8 CAH I LL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 2.2 Significant New Site Information or Data During groundwater monitoring on August 24, 2022, the three existing groundwater monitoring wells were gauged for depth to water and then purged prior to sampling. Site -specific groundwater flow was reported in a southeasterly direction towards Sheep Pond, consistent with previous results. Laboratory analytical results for the August 24, 2022 groundwater monitoring event were received August 31, 2022. The results reported all concentrations of EPH/PAHs and VPH/BTEX as Non -Detect in all wells, with the exception of C9 -C12 fractional VPH reported in monitoring well MW -2 at 141 ug/I, below the applicable GW-1 and GW-3 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards. A summary of the groundwater testing results is provided below in Table 1. The laboratory report is included for reference in Appendix D. Table 1: Results of August Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Event 450 Gulls Way - Brewster, MA (RTN 4-29181) NETLAB Case Number: 2H24037 Lab Sample Number: Date Sampled: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP-EPH) Unadjusted C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Phenanthrene Acenaphthene C9 -C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19 -C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons MW -1 2H24037-01 8/24/2022 N D (<100) ND (<1) ND (<1) ND (<1) ND (<5) ND (<200) ND (<200) ND (<100) MW -2 2H24037-02 8/24/2022 ND (<100) ND (<1) ND (<1) ND (<1) ND (<5) ND (<200) N D (<200) ND (<100) MW -3 2H24037-03 8/24/2022 ND (<100) ND (<1) ND (<1) ND (<1) ND (<5) ND (<200) ND (<200) ND (<100) Units ug/1 ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards GW-1 GW-3 140 10 40 20 700 14000 200 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP-VPH) Unadjusted C5 -C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Unadjusted C9 -C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Benzene Ethylbenzene Methyl t -butyl ether (MTBE) Naphthalene Toluene m&p-Xylene o-Xylene Total xylenes C5 -C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C9 -C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C9 -C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Blue shaded cells indicate analyte detected above aboratory reporting limits Purple shaded cells indicate analyte detected above Method 1 Risk Characterization Standard ND = Analyte Not Detected (Laboratory Reporting Limit in parentheses) ND (<100) ND (<100) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<5) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<100) ND (<100) ND (<100) ND (<100) 141 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<5) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<100) 141 ND (<100) ND (<100) ND (<100) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<5) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<10) ND (<100) ND (<100) ND (<100) ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I 5 700 70 140 1000 see Total xylenes see Total xylenes 10000 300 700 200 20000 20000 10000 10000 50000 50000 5000 10000 5000 50000 20000 40000 see Total xylenes see Total xylenes 5000 50000 50000 50000 Field screening results from the hand borings conducted on October 5 and 6, 2022 reported significant petroleum impact at the HB-3A location, within the storage room, to 10' below grade. Boring HB-9 showed that the soils beyond the northern foundation wall were not impacted. These results helped to identify the best location to install the timber shoring box to facilitate excavating impacted soils to depth. Field screening results for these hand borings are shown below. No samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 4 OF 8 CAHILL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 Table 2: Field Screening Results from Hand Borings (10/5-10/6/22) Cahill Residence - 450 Gulls Way, Brewster Boring HB-3A HB-7 HB-8 HB-9 Depth (ft.) 0-2 - - 167 2.7 2-4 260 1.1 65 2.3 4-6 149 4.5 16.1 1.6 6-8 286 4.4 27.3 0.8 8-10 249 (832) 6.5 134 - 10-12 (10-12') 71 (132) 3.3 - - PID readings reported in parts per million/volume (ppmv) Dexsil PetroFlag readings shown in red, - = No Sample Upon completion of excavation activities, soil samples were collected at the extent of soil removal from Zone A in the western portion of the basement -level storage room. The soil samples were collected from below the foundation footing, approximately 1' below grade. Samples were collected in 8 -ounce jars and covered with aluminum septa. The samples were then screened with a PID by jar-headspace method. If PID readings were reported >10 ppmv, Dowling personnel were instructed to remove additional material from the representative area and another sample was collected for screening. Field screening results for the confirmatory samples collected at the extent of excavation from Zone A are shown below in Table 3. The highlighted samples were submitted for EPH/PAHs and VPH/BTEX laboratory analysis. Table 3: Field Screening Results of Soil Samples During Soil Removal - Zone A 450 Gulls Way- Brewster, MA Sidewall Location North East South West Bottom Depth (ft.) 1-2 NS 715— 2.2 - 1-2 6.2 NS - 1-2 - NS 3.5 - - @2 - - - - 3.9 PID readings reported in parts per million/volume (ppmv), - = Not Applicable, NS=No Sample Readings with line through indicate material was removed and sample was recollected Highlighted cells indicate samples submitted for laboratory analysis Soil samples from the extent of excavation in Zone B were collected in two stages. The first samples were collected after Dowling personnel had excavated the first 4-5' of material from Zone B, prior to installing the timber shoring box. The second set of samples from 5-8' were collected from behind the walls of the shoring box after the box had been advanced to depth. Field screening results showed that soil samples collected from the bottom of the excavation exhibited residual impact in the eastern portion of the excavation. Additional soils were removed from the eastern portion of the excavation to 10' below grade. These soils also reported residual impact, as such a hand boring (HB-10) was advanced and soil samples were collected in 1' intervals to determine the depth of significant impact. Field screening results indicated that PID readings decreased significantly beyond 11' below grade. Additional soils were removed from the eastern portion of Zone B to 11'. Impacted soils observed along the eastern sidewall of Zone B were removed to 8' below grade prior to excavating soils from Zone C. Field screening results for the confirmatory samples collected at the extent of excavation NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 5 OF 8 CAH I LL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 from Zone B are shown below in Table 4. The highlighted samples were submitted for EPH/PAHs and VPH/BTEX laboratory analysis. Table 4: Field Screening Results of Soil Samples During Soil Removal - Zone B 450 Gulls Way- Brewster, MA Sidewall Location North East South West HB-10 Bottom East Bottom West .c .. a. 0 1-5 3.8 - - - 2-4 - l - - 2-5 - 3.2 36.2 - - - 5-8 9.0 �- 98:5— 11.1 2.7 - - - 8-9 - - - - 1-09 0 8-9 - - - - 2.9 @10 - - - - ----M9.„ 145. - 10-11 @11 - - - - - 45.9 - 11-12 34 - - 12-13 - - - - 29 - - PID readings Readings Highlighted cells reported in parts per million/volume (ppmv), Dexsil PetroFlag readings shown in red with line through indicate material was removed and sample was recollected indicate samples submitted for laboratory analysis, - = Not Applicable, NS=No Sample The first 6' of material was excavated from Zone C prior to installing the 12' x 8' trench box. Hand borings HB-11 and HB-12, conducted within Zone C, revealed impacted soils adjacent to the eastern wall of the dwelling, in the southern portion of Zone C, but no significant impact south of the retaining wall in the northern portion of the Zone C. The trench box was then installed and Zone C was advanced to 12' below grade as proposed, however field screening reported significant impact at that depth. Dowling personnel were instructed to remove additional soils from the bottom of the excavation. Soils were excavated to 15' below grade and the bottom of hole samples were recollected for field screening. The soil samples from 15' reported low PID readings in the northern portion of Zone C (24.9 ppmv) and higher readings (182.9 ppmv) in the southern portion. The following day Dowling personnel mixed 560 lbs. of RegenOx Part A into the bottom -of -hole soils in Zone C and partially backfilled the excavation with stone, before constructing and installing the PVC infiltration system. BEA personnel performed hand borings beyond the walls of the trench box to collect the confirmatory soil samples from the extent of excavation in Zone C. Hand borings HB-13 and HB-14 were advanced along the northern and southern sidewalls, respectively. Hand borings HB-15 and HB-16 were advanced along the eastern side wall and hand borings HB-17 and HB-18 were advanced along the western sidewall. Prior to advancing the hand borings along the eastern side of the trench box, visually/olfactory contaminated soils were removed to 7' below grade. Additional soils were removed to 9' below grade along the southeastern sidewall based on field screening results. Field screening results for the confirmatory samples collected at the extent of excavation from Zone C are shown below in Table 5. The highlighted samples were submitted for EPH/PAHs and VPH/BTEX laboratory analysis. NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 6 OF 8 CAHILL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 Table 5: Field Screening Results of Soil Samples During Soil Removal - Zone C 450 Gulls Way - Brewster, MA Location North East South West Bottom North Bottom South Sidewall Hand Boring HB-12 HB-13 HB-15 HB-16 SW -NE SW -E SW -SE HB-11 HB-14 HB-17 HB-18 x t m 0-1 NS (soil removed) NS (footing) NS (soil removed) - - NS (soil removed) NS (footing) NS (soil removed) NS (soil removed) 0.1 0-3 - ND 0.1 0.1 - - 1-3 0.2 - - - 0.1 3-5 - 0.2 3-7 - ND 0.2 0.1 0.5 5-7 0.2 6-8 1.7 - 7-9 - 0.2 1.2 - - - 3.6 51.7 - 8-10 0.9 - - ------=-----__ - - 5.7 9-11 - 0.2 15.3 1.0 - - - 86.9 51.0 - 0.7 - - - - �\^ 1 - - 1.7 10-12 \ 119:6-...._�z� @12 12-13 . 0.2 108.7 0 6 - 131.1 40.2 - 1.0 0.3 - - _ 12-14 - 0.3 17.7 0.8 - - - 59.8 3.1 - 13-15 - - - - - _ _ _ - 24.9 182.9 @15 14-16 0.1 - - - _ - 47 0.1 - - Highlighted PID cells indicate readings reported in parts per million/volume (ppmv), Dexsil PetroFlag readings shown in red Readings with line through indicate material was removed and sample was recollected samples submitted for laboratory analysis, - = Not Applicable, NS=No Sample, ND = Non -Detect (<0.1 ppmv) During groundwater monitoring on November 8, 2022, monitoring wells MW -1 and MW -3 were gauged for depth to water and then purged prior to sampling. Monitoring well MW -2 was not sampled as it was destroyed during soil removal from Zone C. Monitoring well MW -2 is scheduled to be replaced on November 17, 2022. Laboratory results for soil samples collected at the extent of Zones A and B were received on November 11, 2022. The results reported residual concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons, below the Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards, in two sidewall samples from Zone B. The remaining samples reported all concentrations of EPH/PAHs and VPH/BTEX as Non -Detect. Laboratory results are summarized below in Table 6. NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 7 OF 8 CAH I LL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 Table 6: Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected at Extent of Excavation - Zone A and Zone B 450 Gulls Way - Brewster, MA Zone ZoneA Zone8 Sample ID 5W:1-2' Comp. BOH@2' SW -N:1-5' SW -S: 2-5' SW -W:2-5' SW -N: 5-8' SW -5:5-B' SW -W5-8' 601-1-W @8' BOH-E @ 11 212801740 Method 1 Risk Characterization Standards Lab Sample Number: 2128017-01 10/27/2022 2128017-02 10/24/2022 2128017-03 10/24/2022 2128017-04 10/24/2022 2128017-05 10/24/2022 2J28017-06 10/27/2022 2128017-07 10/27/2022 2128017-08 10/27/2022 2128017-09 10/27/2022 10/27/2022 Units S-1/GW- 5-1/GW- 5-2/GW- S -2/6W- 5-3/6W- 5 -3/6W - Date Sampled: Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP-EPH) Unadjusted C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons ND (<6.78) ND (<6.74) ND (<6.88) NO (<6.74) 30.8 ND (<7.01) ND (<6.8) ND ND (<6.96) ND (<0.34) ND (<6.93) ND (<0.34) ND (<7) ND (<0.35) mg/kg mg/kg 500 4 1000 4 3000 Naphthalene ND (<0.34) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.35) (<0.34) ND mg/kg 0 7 300 1 500 1 500 2-Methylnaphthalene Phenanthrene ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.35) ND (<0.35) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) (<0.35) ND (<0.35) mg/kg 10 4 500 1000 20 4 1000 3000 20 4 3000 5000 Acenaphthene ND (<0.34) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.33) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.35) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.34) ND (<0.35) mg/kg 1000 1000 3000 3000 5000 5000 C9 -C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND (<13.5) ND (<13.4) ND (<13.7) ND (<13.4) 49.1 ND (<14) ND (<13.6) ND (<13.9) ND ND (<13.8) ND (<13.8) ND (<14) ND (<14) mg/kg mg/kg 3000 5000 5000 5000 5000 C19 -C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND (<13.5) ND (<13.4) ND (<13.7) ND (<13.4) 29.6 ND (<14) ND (<13.6) (<13.9) ND (<7) mg/kg 3000 1000 1000 3000 1000 5000 ND ND (<6.74) ND (<6.88) ND (<6.74) 30.8 ND (<7.01) ND (<6.8) ND (<6.96) ND (<6.93) C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons (<6.78) Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP-VPH) ND(<5) ND (<5.5) mg/kg Unadjusted C5 -CB Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND (<5.1) ND (<5.2) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.5) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.2) ND (<5) ND (<5.5) mg/kg Unadjusted C9 -C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Benzene ND (<5.1) ND (<0.3) ND (<5.2) ND (<0.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<0.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<0.3) 9.1 ND (<0.3) 12.8 ND (<0.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<0.3) ND (<5.2) ND (<0.3) ND (<0.2) ND (<0.3) mg/kg 2 40 40 500 2 40 200 1000 2 40 1000 3000 Ethylbenzene Methyl t -butyl Naphthalene ND (<0.3) ND((<0.5)) ND (<0.3) ND((<0. <0.05) ND (<0.3) ND ND (<0.5) ND (<0.3) ND ND (<0.5) ND (<0.3) ND ND(<0.5) ND(( ND (<0.3) ND O5)) ND (<0.3) ND ND (<0.5) ND (<0.3) ND ND(<0.5) ND ND (<0.5) NO (<0.2) (<0.05) ND (<0.2) ND (<0.3) ND( 06)) ND (<0.3) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 0 41 30 1130 500 500 41 30 500 1000 1000 0 41 30 500 3000 3000 Toluene ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (c0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) see Total see Total see Total see Total see Total see Total m&p-Xylene ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.6) mg/kg xylenes see Total xylenes see Total xylenes see Total xylenes see Total xylenes see Total xylenes see Total o-Xylene ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.6) mg/kg xylenes 400 xylenes 500 xylenes 400 xylenes 1000 xylenes 400 xylenes 3000 Total xylenes ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.5) ND (<0.6) mg/kg 100 100 500 500 500 500 C5 -C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C9 -C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND (<5.1) ND (<5.1) ND (<5.1) ND (<5.2) ND (<5.2) ND (<5.2) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) 9.1 ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) 12.8 ND (<5.5) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.3) ND (<5.2) ND (<5.2) ND (<5.2) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND(<5) ND (<5.5) ND (<5.5) ND (<5.5) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 1000 100 1000 100 3000 300 3000 500 limit 5000 300 5000 500 C9 -C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons laboratory reporting limn, Purple shading indicates analyte dete ted above Method 1 Risk Characterization Standard, ND = Analyte Not Detected above laboratory reporting (in p rentheses Blue shaded <elk indicate analyte detected above Laboratory analytical results from the extent of excavation from Zone C, as well as the results of groundwater monitoring on November 8, are pending at the time of this report. 2.3 Details of and/or Plans for Remediation Waste, Remedial Wastewater and/or Remedial Additives Approximately 100 cubic yards (139.39 tons) of impacted soils were transported off site and transported to Ondrick Materials & Recycling in Chicopee, MA. Weight slips for this material are included for reference in Appendix C. As described above, 560 lbs. of RegenOx® Part A was mixed into bottom -of -hole soils in Zone C as a contingency for chemical oxidation treatment as may be desired pending receipt of analytical results of endpoint soils and groundwater analysis. If laboratory results indicate that additional treatment is necessary, BEA proposes to apply 560 lbs. of RegenOx® Part B to the subsurface using the infiltration system installed prior to backfilling the excavation. It is understood that written approval from the Department would be required prior to applying the Part B RegenOx®. Quarterly groundwater monitoring has included baseline testing for remedial monitoring in anticipation of RegenOx® use. Groundwater samples were collected for iron, sodium, sulfate, calcium, magnesium, and hardness consistent with the chemical properties of the RegenOx® product. 2.4 Other Information Required by the Department in its Approval of the IRA Plan No other information was requested by the Department to approve the IRA Plan. NOVEMBER 14, 2022 PAGE 8 OF 8 CAHILL/K11428 IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II/RTN 4-29181 2.5 LSP Opinion as to Whether the IRA is Being Conducted in Conformance with the IRA Plan and any Conditions of Approval established by the Department The LSP Opinion that the IRA is being conducted in conformance with the IRA Plan and any conditions of approval established by the Department can be found on the enclosed Immediate Response Action Transmittal Form (BWSC-105) in Appendix C. DETAIL Ground Level = 0 TB -9 / MW -3 ZONE B ADVANCED TO DEPTH USING SHORING G'3'x8'x8'-II'(13) ZONE A EXTENT OF EXCAVATION 12.5'x 8.5'x 2'(D) CLEANOUT (Y FITTING) ENCL05URE A BASEMENT FLOOR LEVEL (DECK ABOVE) . . AREA OF OIL RELEASE SCALE I "=5' PASSIVE WIND TURBINE VENT SYSTEM RISER TB -1 I HB-12 SOUTHERN PORTION OF ZONE B EXCAVATED TO 5' BG5 WALKOUT BASEMENT PLOWABLE FILL EXTERIOR PLASTIC SHEETING FOUNDATION VAPOR BARRIER (G m10 WALL WASHED AGGREGATE EASTERN PORTION OF ZONE C EXCAVATED TO 7' BG5 CONCRETE PAD ZONE C ADVANCED TO DEPTH USING TRENCH BOX 1 3' x 8' 4" x 15'(D) DOUBLE WASHED STONE AGGREGATE PERFORATED PVC LATERALS (501 40) CONCRETE PAD VENT TO ROOF WIND TURBINE PASSIVE VENTING / PASSIVE VENTING / INFILTRATION SYSTEM SCHEMATIC (TYPICAL) INFILTRATION SYSTEM OVERHEAD SCHEMATIC NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE REFERENCE - PLAN TITLED 'SITE PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM...', PREPARED BY CAPE COD ENGINEERING, INC., DATED MAY 28, 2001 - TOWN OF BREWSTER GIS MAPPING - GOOGLE MAP DATA ® 2022 NOTE: THIS SITE PLAN WAS NOT PREPARED FROM ANY INSTRUMENT SURVEY AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THE DISTANCES, BEARING AND/OR OTHER FEATURES SHOWN BE USED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY ONES. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. RETAINING WALL SEE DETAIL LOCUS 40 GULLS WAY 5 SITE PLAN 0 30 GO 90 C SCALE I'=30' f // / 71 /I BREWSTER, MA KEY MAP LEGEND .115 HAND BORING •T5 TEST BORING A MW MONITORING WELL ® PRIVATE POTABLE WELL SHEEP POND RTN# 4-29181 REV. 11/10/22: Show Zone A, B, and C expanded areas of soil removal, add hand borings, show MW -2 as destroyed, add groundwater flow vectors. Project: DANIEL CAHILL 40 GULLS WAY - BREWSTER, MA 02631 Title: IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTION STATUS II 40 GULLS WAY - BREWSTER, MA 02631 BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC. rofei A NATURAL SYSTEMS UTILITIES COMPANY LICENSED SITE PROFESSIONALS, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, GEOLOGISTS, ENGINEERS 1573 MAIN STREET, BREWSTER, MA 02631 PHONE: (508) 896-1706 www.benant-c com FAX: (508) 896-5109 DATE SCALE 11/10/22 As Noted BY SRF CHECK RPT JOB NUMBER K11428DA.X.EV.901 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424 - 40.0427 (Subpart D) BWSC 105 Release Tracking Number f 4 29181 A. SITE LOCATION: 1. Release Name/Location Aid: 2. Street Address: 3. City/Town: CONCRETE STORAGE AREA UNDER DECK 450 GULLS WAY BREWSTER 4. Zip Code: 026310000 ✓ 5. Check here if this location is Adequately Regulated, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0110-0114. r a. CERCLA r b. HSWA Corrective Action r c. Solid Waste Management r d. RCRA State Program (21C Facilities) B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply) 1. List Submittal Date of Initial IRA Written Plan (if previously submitted): 3/23/2022 ✓ 2. Submit an Initial IRA Plan. ✓ 3. Submit a Modified IRA Plan of a previously submitted written IRA Plan. ✓ 4. Submit an Imminent Hazard Evaluation. (check one) f a. An Imminent Hazard exists in connection with this Release or Threat of Release. r b. An Imminent Hazard does not exist in connection with this Release or Threat of Release. r c. It is unknown whether an Imminent Hazard exists in connection with this Release or Threat of Release, and further assessment activities will be undertaken. r d. It is unknown whether an Imminent Hazard exists in connection with this Release or Threat of Release. However, response actions will address those conditions that could pose an Imminent Hazard. ✓ 5. Submit a request to Terminate an Active Remedial System or Response Action(s) Taken to Address an Imminent Hazard. i✓ 6. Submit an IRA Status Report r 7. Submit a Remedial Monitoring Report. (This report can only be submitted through eDEP.) a. Type of Report: (check one) r i. Initial Report b. Frequency of Submittal: (check all that apply) r i. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted monthly to address an Imminent Hazard. r ii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted monthly to address a Condition of Substantial Release Migration r iii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted every six months, concurrent with an IRA Status Report. r iv. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted annually, concurrent with an IRA Status Report. c. Number of Remedial Systems and/or Monitoring Programs: A separate BWSCIO5A, IRA Remedial Monitoring Report, must be filled out for each Remedial System and/or Monitoring Program addressed by this transmittal form. r ii. Interim Report r iii. Final Report • Revised: 11/14/2013 Page 1 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1�') Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup `1 ` Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424 - 40.0427 (Subpart D) BWSC 105 Release Tracking Number 29181 4 r 8. Submit an IRA Completion Statement. r a. Check here if future response actions addressing this Release or Threat of Release notification condition will be conducted as part of the Response Actions planned or ongoing at a Site that has already been Tier Classified under a different Release Tracking Number (RT b. Provide Release Tracking Number of Tier Classified Site (Primary RTN): These additional response actions must occur according to the deadlines applicable to the Primary RTN. Use the Primary RTN when making all future submittals for the site unless specifically relating to this Immediate Response Action. j 9. Submit a Revised IRA Completion Statement. r 10. Submit a Plan for the Application of Remedial Additives near a sensitive receptor, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0046(3). (All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above) C. RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE CONDITIONS THAT WARRANT IRA: 1. Media Impacted and Receptors Affected: (check all that apply) r a. Paved Surface r d. Public Water Supply r e. Surface Water r f Zone 2 r j. Groundwater r k. Sediments r 1. Wetland r p. Soil Gas r q. Sub -Slab Soil Gas r r. Others Specify: r g. Private Well r m. Storm Drain r r. Critical Exposure Pathway r b. Basement r h. Residence r n. Indoor Air r s. NAPL r c. School P i. Soil o. Air r t. Unknown 2. Sources of the Release or TOR: (check all that apply) r a. Transformer r b. Fuel Tank r c. Pipe r d. OHM Delivery e. AST r f. Drums r j. UST Describe: r m. Unknown r n. Other: r g. Tanker Truck r h. Hose 1— k. Vehicle r i. Line r I. BoatNessel 3. Type of Release or TOR: (check all that apply) r e. Rupture r k. UST Removal r 1. Unknown r m Other: r a. Dumping r f. Vehicle Accident r g. Leak Describe: r b. Fire r h. Spill r c. AST Removal r i. Test failure )✓ d. Overfill r j. TOR Only 4. Identify Oils and Hazardous Materials Released: (check all that apply) r c. Heavy Metals r d. Others Specify: W a. Oils r b. Chlorinated Solvents D. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS: (check all that apply, for volumes list cumulative amounts) r 1. Assessment and/or Monitoring Only 17 3. Deployment of Absorbent or Containment Materials r 5. Structure Venting System/HVAC Modification System r 7. Product or NAPL Recovery r 9. Groundwater Treatment Systems r 11. Remedial Additives r 13. Active Exposure Pathway Mitigation System 1✓ 2. Temporary Covers or Caps r 4. Temporary Water Supplies r 6. Temporary Evacuation or Relocation of Residents r 8. Fencing and Sign Posting r 10. Soil Vapor Extraction r 12. Air Sparging r 14. Passive Exposure Pathway Mitigation System Revised: 11/14/2013 Page 2 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424 - 40.0427 (Subpart D) BWSC 105 Release Tracking Number 1.4 29181 D. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS: (cont.) Fi 15. Excavation of Contaminated Soils. r a. Re -use, Recycling or Treatment r i. On Site Estimated volume in cubic yards ii. Off Site Estimated volume in cubic yards 100 iia. Receiving Facility: ONDRICK MATERIALS & RECYCLING Town: CHICOPEE State: MA iib. Receiving Facility: Town: State: iii. Describe: r b. Store r i. On Site Estimated volume in cubic yards r ii. Off Site Estimated volume in cubic yards iia. Receiving Facility: Town: State: iib. Receiving Facility: Town: State: r c. Landfill r i. Cover Estimated volume in cubic yards Receiving Facility: Town: State: r ii. Disposal Estimated volume in cubic yards Receiving Facility: Town: State: r 16. Removal of Drums, Tanks, or Containers: a. Describe Quantity and Amount: b. Receiving Facility: Town: State: c. Receiving Facility: Town: State: r 17. Removal of Other Contaminated Media: a. Specify Type and Volume: li 18. Other Response Actions: Describe: APPLY 560 LBS. OF REGENOX PART A IN BOTTOM OF HOLE SOILS r 19. Use of Innovative Technologies: Describe: Revised: 11/14/2013 Page 3 of 6 L Massachusetts Department ofEnvironmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424 - 40.0427 (Subpart D) BWSC 105 Release Tracking Number 14 - 29181 E. LSP SIGNATURE AND STAMP: I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of (i) the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1), (ii) the applicable provisionsof 309 CMR 4.02(2) and (3), and 309 CMR 4.03(2), and (iii) the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3), to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, > if Section B of this form indicates that an Immediate Response Action Plan is being submitted, the response action(s) that is(are) the subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is(are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish thepurposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and (iii) complies(y) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B of this form indicates that an Imminent Hazard Evaluation is being submitted, this Imminent Hazard Evaluation was developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, and the assessment activity(ies) undertaken to support this Imminent Hazard Evaluation comply(ies) with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000; > if Section B of this form indicates that an Immediate Response Action Status Report and/or a Remedial Monitoring Report is(are) being submitted, the response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) is (are) being implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,(ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B of this form indicates that an Immediate Response Action Completion Statement or a request to Terminate an Active Remedial System or Response Action(s) Taken to Address an Imminent Hazard is being submitted, the response action(s) that is(are) the subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is(are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal. I am aware that significant penalties may result, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, if I submit information which I know to be false, inaccurate or materially incomplete. 1. LSP I: 1707 2. First Name: JOHN 3. Last Name: TADEMA-VNELANDT 4. Telephone: 508-535-0487 7. Signature: JOHN TADEMMMELANDT 5. Ext: 6. Email: jtadema-weilandt@nsuwater.com 8. Date: 11/18/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) 9. LSP Stamp: Revised: 11/14/2013 Page 4 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection L_1III]Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424 - 40.0427 (Subpart D) F. PERSON UNDERTAKING IRA: r a. change in contact name r b. change of address J c. change in the person undertaking response actions 1. Check all that apply: 2. Name of Organization: BWSC 105 Release Tracking Number 14 - 29181 3. Contact First Name: DANIEL 4. Last Name: CAHILL 5. Street: 450 GULLS WAY 7. City/Town: BREVVSTER 10. Telephone: 774-722-9014 11.Ext 6. Title: HOMEOWNER 8. State: MA 9. Zip Code: 026310000 12. Email: cahill.dan450@gmail.com G. RELATIONSHIP TO RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE OF PERSON UNDERTAKING IRA: ✓ Check here to change relationship I 1. RP orPRP a. Owner r b. Operator r c. Generator r d. Transporter r e. Other RP or PRP Specify Relationship: ✓ 2. Fiduciary, Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E, s. 2) ✓ 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E, s. 5(j)) I— 4. Any Other Person Undertaking Response Actions: Specify Relationship: H. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT AND SUBMITTALS: ✓ 1. Check here if any Remediation Waste, generated as a result of this IRA, will be stored, treated, managed, recycled or reused at the site following submission of the IRA Completion Statement. If this box is checked, you must submit one of the following plans, along with the appropriate transmittal form. r a. A Release Abatement Measure (RAM) Plan (BWSC106) r b. Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (BWSC108) r 2. Check here if the Response Action(s) on which this opinion is based, if any, are (were) subject to any order(s), permit(s) and/or approval(s) issued by MassDEP or EPA. If the box is checked, you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable provisions thereof. ✓ 3. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Boardof Health were notified of the implementation of an Immediate Response Action taken to control, prevent, abate or eliminate an Imminent Hazard. ✓ 4. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Boardof Health were notified of the submittal of a Completion Statement for an Immediate Response Action taken to control, prevent, abate or eliminate an Imminent Hazard. ✓ 5. Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is incorrect, e.g. Release Address/Location Aid. Send corrections to BWSC.eDEP@state.ma.us. jv 6. Check here to certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts, data, and other information is attached. Revised: 11/14/2013 Page 5 of 6 L., N), --Piwil Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Immediate Response Action (IRA) Transmittal Form Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0424 - 40.0427 (Subpart D) BWSC 105 Release Tracking Number 4 29181 I. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTAKING IRA: 1. I, DANIEL CAHILL , attest under the pains and penalties of perjury (i) that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form; (ii) that, based on my inquiry of the/those individual(s) immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, true, accurate and complete; (iii) that, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I/the person(s) or entity(ies) on whose behalf this submittal is made satisfy(ies) the criteria in 310 CMR 40.0183(2); (iv) that I/the person(s) or entity(ies) on whose behalf this submittal is made have provided notice in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0183(5); and (v) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the person(s) or entity(ies) legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person(s) or entity(ies) on whose behalf this submittal is made is/are aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete information. 2. By: DANIEL CAHILL 3. Title: HOMEOWNER 4. For: DANIEL CAHILL 5. Date: 11/18/2022 (mm/dd/yyyy) r 6. Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section F. 7. Street: 8. City/Town: 9. State: 10. Zip Code: 11. Telephone: 12. Ext 13. Email: YOU ARE SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE FEE OF UP TO $10,000 PER BILLABLE YEAR FOR THIS DISPOSAL SITE. YOU MUST LEGIBLY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM, YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE. Date Stamp (DEP USE ONLY:) Received by DEP on 11/18/2022 12:40:04 PM Revised: 11/14/2013 Page 6 of 6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION TRANSMITTAL FORM Pursuant to 310 CMR 4.02 BWSC 120 12 Release Tracking Number 4 29181 A. HOMEOWNER IDENTIFICATION AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATION: Property owner: 1. First Name: DANIEL 2. Last Name: 3. Name of Ownership Entity or Condominium Association (if applicable): 4. Property Address: 450 GULLS WAY CAHILL 5. City/Town: BREWSTER 6. ZIP Code: 026310000 7. Telephone: 7747229014 8. Number of Residential Units: Foi a. One r b. Two r c. Three r d. Four (Homeowner certifications do not apply to residences of greater then 4 units) .The person or entity listed above must meet the definition of Homeowner pursuant to 310 CMR 4.02, Timely Action Schedule and Fee Provisions, that states: A Homeowner is an owner occupant of a residential one to four family structure who has provided a written certification on a Department approved form and whose structure has been used exclusively as a one to four family residence throughout his or her ownership, where the owner's unit is the owner's principal residence for 6 or more months of the year and the owner is conducting response actions at the residence in response to a release of oil. B. RELATIONSHIP OF PERSON/ENTITY MAKING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION TO PROPERTY: r 1. Homeowner r 2. Person authorized to make the attestation in Section C on behalf of Homeowner r 3. Condominium Association with one to four units C. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON/ENTITY SUBMITTING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION FORM: 1. I, DANIEL CAHILL , attest under the pains and penalties of perjury: > if Section B of this form indicates Homeowner, (i) that I am the owner and occupant of a one to four family residential structure that has been used exclusively as a one to four family residence throughout my ownership; (ii) that the residential structure is my principal residence for 6 or more months of the year; (iii) that I am conducting response actions pursuant to M.G.L. chapter 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, at the residence in response to a release of oil; and (iv) that I am aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, or inaccurate attestation regarding (i), (ii), or (iii) of this certification. > if Section B of this form indicates Person authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the Homeowner, (i) that I am a duly authorized representative of the person listed in Section A of this form who is the owner and occupant of a one to four family residential structure that has been used exclusively as a one to four family residence throughout the ownership of the person listed in Section A; (ii) that the residential structure is the principal residence of the person listed in Section A for 6 or more months of the year; (iii) that the person listed in Section A is conducting response actions pursuant to M.G.L. chapter 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, at the residence in response to a release of oil; and (iv) that I am aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, or inaccurate attestation regarding (i), (ii), or (iii) of this certification. Revised: 05/13/2013 Page 1 of 2 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection N `_�, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup �' `--._ HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION TRANSMITTAL FORM r ' 't Pursuant to 310 CMR 4.02 BWSC 120 12 Release Tracking Number 4 29181 C. CER1IN'ICATION OF PERSON/ENTITY SUBMITTING HOMEOWNER CERTIFICATION FORM: (cont.) > if Section B of this form indicates Condominium Association, (i) that I am a duly authorized representative of the entity listed in Section A of this form which is comprised of one or more individual owner(s) and occupant(s) of a one to four family residential structure that has been used exclusively as a one to four family residence throughout the period of ownership; (ii) that the residential structure is the principal residence for 6 or more months of the year of the owner(s) and occupant(s); (iii) that the person or entity listed in Section A of this form is conducting response actions pursuant to M.G.L. chapter 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, at the residence in response to a release of oil; and (iv) that I am aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, or inaccurate attestation regarding (i), (ii), or (iii) of this certification. 2. By: DANIEL CAHILL 3. Date: 11/18/2022 Signature mm/dd/yyyy r 4. Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section A. 5. Street: 6. City/Town: 7. State: 8. ZIP Code: 9. Telephone: 10. Ext.: 11. Email: If submitting by hand or mail, the completed form with original signature must be submitted to the following DEP office : Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, Cost Recovery, Fees and Revenue Section One Winter Street, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02108-4747 Date Stamp (DEP USE ONLY:) Received by DEP on 11/18/2022 10:15:34 AM Revised: 05/13/2013 Page 2 of 2 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Announces "Try Transit" offering Free Fares on both Fridays and Saturdays from Black Friday through New Year's Eve HYANNIS, MA —November 15, 2022 - Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority announced today that from November 25th through December 31st Fixed Route bus services would be free every Friday and Saturday thanks, in part, to a grant included in the state budget and awarded by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. The program is designed to encourage new customers to "Try Transit" by offering no cost trips to shop or dine at local businesses, visit with friends and family, and commute to work during the holiday season. The Cape Cod RTA also offers Free Fares for adults 60 and over every Wednesday. "Although primarily designed to attract new customers by easing access to services, "Try Transit" will of course also offer a financial reprieve to current riders during these times of high inflation and holiday shopping. It is expected that the savings and increased mobility offered by CCRTA fixed route services will translate into increased spending at local shops and restaurants. In addition, using public transit during the holiday season will help to address parking challenges that exist and reduce greenhouse gas emissions," stated CCRTA Administrator Tom Cahir. Cape Cod Chamber of Commerce CEO, Paul Neidzwiecki said, "We applaud the Cape Cod RTA for offering this wonderful program. It's a win -win for the Cape community and our local businesses, and we hope to see programs like this continue." Marty Bruemmel, President/CEO of the Greater Hyannis Chamber of Commerce added, "With the upcoming Holiday season, the "Try Transit" program gives the shopper an excellent opportunity to help get out and shop, then celebrate the Holidays at a local restaurant or pub and not have to worry about any packed parking lots and driving. It'll also help showcase the excellent services provided by the Cape Cod RTA." "MassDOT is pleased to have worked closely with the Commonwealth's 15 Regional Transit Authorities to utilize the funding awarded in the FY23 state budget for the "Try Transit" program. This initiative is another example of the many efforts where MassDOT and the RTAs collaborate to improve mobility options for Massachusetts transit customers," commented MassDOT Rail & Transit Administrator Meredith Slesinger. Happy Holidays! 2 About the CCTRA: The Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority (CCRTA) is one of 15 Regional Transit Authorities within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and has been providing public transportation services since 1976 to residents and visitors as well as consumers of state agencies and human service organizations for all 15 Cape Cod communities. The CCRTA owns and operates the Hyannis Transportation Center in downtown Hyannis and the state of the art Operations and Maintenance Facility in South Dennis. For more information, visit Cape Cod RTA at our website www.capecodrta.org or follow us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/capecodrta and https://www.facebook.com/Capeflyer & Twitter https://twitter.com/Capecodrta & https://twitter.com/CapeFLYER1 and Instagram https://instagram.com/capeflyer/ In 2009, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) was created to unify the state's various transportation agencies. MassDOT now includes the Highway Division, the MBTA and Rail Transit Division, the Aeronautics Division, and the Registry of Motor Vehicles. MassDOT is committed to providing a safe and reliable transportation system to all those who travel in the Commonwealth and works to deliver excellent customer service. MassDOT has been nationally recognized for its innovative approach to transportation, including the Accelerated Bridge Program, the "Where's My Bus and Train?" apps and "Fast 14" work. For more information, visit MassDOT at our website: www.mass.gov/massdot blog: http://blog.mass.gov/transportation/, or follow MassDOT on twitter at https://twitter.com/MassDOT and Facebook at www.facebook.com/massdotinfo. Media Contact: Kathleen Jensen kjensen@capecodrta.org 508.775.8504 3 Archive d: Monday, November 21, 2022 3:38:54 PM From: Goldstein, Ronit Se nt: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:36:27 +0000ARC To: Amy Handel; Conor Kenny; Donna Kalinick; Erika Mawn; Griffin Ryder; Heath Eldredge; James Jones; Kevin Varley; Peter Lombardi; Robert Moran; Susan Broderick Subje ct: Winter Energy Prices- January Increase Se ns itivity: N ormal Attachme nts : handout_MA_WMA_Electric_programs_to_help_aug22 (1).pdf; EMA Basic Service Rate November 2022 Release FIN AL.pdf; Good morning, I hope you are well. Please see information below and attached regarding Winter Energy Prices and an increase in January. Increasing Electricity Prices and Winter BillsMany Americans are coping with increasing prices, including rising energy bills. We know our customers count on us every day for the energy theyneed and recognize our role in keeping bills as low as possible as energy prices surge.\u8239 \u8239 The cost of Basic Service (energy/electricity) changes twice a year in Massachusetts for Eversource customers – on January 1 and July 1. Eversourcehas filed with the Department of Public Utilities (DPU), the new cost of energy supply beginning January 1, 2023. As you know, Eversource does not produce electricity, but purchases energy to meet customers’ electric needs throughout the year. Eversource does not earn a profit on the cost of energy and charges customers only what the company pays in the energy market. Beginning January 1, pending approval by the DPU, the average residential Eversource electric customer in Eastern MA using 600 kWh will see a 23% or $47 increase to their total bill. Eversource serves Basic Service to 29% of Eversource customers in Eastern MA. This increase does not apply to customers that receive energy from another supplier or through municipal aggregation. A customer’s total bill amount depends on their energy use, the type of rate they are on, and weather conditions. The increase is a result of record-high natural gas prices, primarily driven by the Russian and Ukraine conflict. This is especially impactful here in New England, where natural gas is used to generate much of the region’s electricity. While adjustments to other components of the bill take effect January 1, 2023, rising energy costs are the primary factor impacting customers’ total monthly bills. We will share those other adjustments with you when we receive more information. Programs to Help Customers \u8239 We recognize the financial burden this places on customers who are already facing higher prices on everyday goods and services. To help customers through this time, we offer programs to lessen the impact on their bill by helping better manage energy use and providing direct assistance to those in need. Customers are encouraged to: Visit Eversource.com to learn more about the many Energy Efficiency rebates and services to help reduce energy use at little or no cost.Simple changes can help lower bills.  Take advantage of our Heating Cost Calculator to see how adjustments to your thermostat can help them saveenergy.\u8239 \u8239 \u8239  Schedule a virtual home pre-assessment with an energy technician to identify energy-saving opportunities in your home. CALL 1-866-527-SAVE (7283) TO LEARN MORE ABOUT HOME ENERGY A SSESSMENTS.  Enroll in Budget Billing to set up predictable monthly payments and even out bill spikes during heating and cooling seasons.\u8239  Compare rates offered by other electric suppliers and choose the option that works best for them.\u8239  Learn about special assistance programs to lower your monthly payments, forgive past due balances or spread payments out overtime.\u8239 \u8239 \u8239 \u8239 \u8239 We encourage all customers to review our programs and ways to manage or get help with their bill at Eversource.com/winter-bill..\u8239 \u8239 \u8239 \u8239 Thank you for your consideration, and please contact me if you have any questions.\u8239 \u8239 \u8239 \u8239 Ronit Ronit Golds tein C ommunity Relations & Economic Development 480 Willow Street, Yarmouth, MA 02664 |( 617-966-8459 (cell) * ronit.golds tein@evers ource.com Thi s electronic me ssage contains i nformation from Eversource Energy or its affi l i ate s that may be confi dential, proprie tary or othe rwi se protecte d from disclosure . The information i s intended to be used sol e l y by the recipient(s) name d. Any views or opinions expressed i n thi s message are not necessarily those of Eversource Energy or its affi l i ates. Any disclosure , copyi ng or di stri bution of this me ssage or the taking of any acti on base d on i ts contents, othe r than by the inte nde d re ci pi e nt for its intended purpose, i s strictl y prohibite d. If you have receive d thi s e-mail i n error, please notif y the se nde r i mme di ate l y and delete it from your system. Emai l transmission cannot be guaranteed to be error-free or se cure or free from viruses, and Eve rsource Ene rgy di scl aims all liabi l i ty for any re sul ting damage, errors, or omissi ons. Struggling to pay your electric or heating bill? We have programs to help. For more information on these assistance programs, scan the QR code below, visit Eversource.com/billhelp or call us at 866-861-6225 (Eastern Massachusetts) or 877-963-2632 (Western Massachusetts). We’ll work with you one-on-one to find the best program for you. Have your outstanding balance eliminated in as little as 12 months. We’ll establish a monthly budget payment for you based on your usage. Make your scheduled New Start monthly payment, and a portion of the total balance enrolled in New Start will be eliminated or “forgiven,” reducing the amount you owe each month. Please see income guidelines below and visit Eversource.com/billhelp to apply. Visit MassSave.applytosave.com to verify your eligibility or contact your local community action agency. Discount RateDiscount Rate Fuel Assistance Energy Efficiency Payment Plans Customers receiving public assistance benefits and with a household income at or below 60% of the state median income may be eligible for a 36% discount on their monthly electric bill. If your gross income is at or below 60 percent of the state median income, you may qualify for assistance toward your utility bills. Reduce energy use and stay comfortable for less with energy-saving upgrades. You may qualify for 100% off approved insulation and air sealing plus generous rebates on heating equipment and to remove barriers to energy efficiency work. All customers, regardless of income can pay a past due balance over a period of time. New Start 2022-2023 Income Eligibility Guidelines for Assistance Programs (60% of the State Median Income) Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Income Level $42,411 $55,461 $68,511 $81,561 $94,610 $107,660 $110,107 $112,554 Household Size 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Income Level $115,001 $117,448 $119,895 $112,342 $124,788 $127,235 $129,682 $132,129 Other Help: Massachusetts also has resources available to help residents pay utility bills and rent payments. Contact your local Rental Assistance Agency for more information by dialing 2-1-1. Good Neighbor Energy Fund may provide additional financial assistance for overdue utility bills. Visit MAGoodNeighbor.org. More Information: Massachusetts 2-1-1: Mass211.org or call 2-1-1 Department of Public Utilities: 877-886-5066 Scan here for more information. Reduce tu consumo de energía y mantén tu hogar cómodo a un menor costo haciéndole mejoras o actualizaciones para ahorrar energía. Podrías calificar para un 100% de descuento en cierto tipo de aislamiento térmico y sellado de fugas de aire, además de reembolsos grandes en equipos de calefacción y para eliminar impedimentos de los trabajos de eficiencia energética. Los clientes que reciben beneficios de asistencia pública y con ingresos en el hogar igual o por debajo del 60% del ingreso promedio del estado podrían calificar para un descuento mensual de 36% en su factura de electricidad. ¿Estás teniendo problemas para pagar tu recibo de luz o calefacción? Tenemos programas para ayudarte. Para más información sobre estos programas de ayuda, apunta tu cámara en el código abajo, visita Eversource.com/ayuda o llámanos al 866-861-6225 (Este de Massachusetts) o 877-963-2632 (Oeste de Massachusetts). Te ayudaremos a encontrar el mejor programa para ti. 2022-2023 Pautas de Ingresos para Los Programas de Asistencia (60% del Ingreso Medio Estatal) Tarifa de Descuento Fuel Assistance Eficiencia Energética  Planes de Pago Todos los clientes, sin importar su nivel de ingresos pueden obtener un periodo de tiempo para pagar un saldo atrasado. Elimina tu saldo atrasado en tan sólo12 meses. Estableceremos un pago mensual basado en tu consumo. Haz tu pago mensual de Nuevo Comienzo programado y parte de tu saldo al momento de inscribirte en el programa será eliminado o “perdonado,” reduciendo la cantidad que debes cada mes. Nuevo Comienzo o New Start MN/EMA/WMA/Elec 0822 Por favor ve la siguiente guía de ingresos y visita Eversource.com/ayuda para aplicar. Visita MassSave.applytosave.com (oprime español) para ver si calificas o comunícate con tu agencia de acción comunitaria local. Si tu ingreso antes de los impuestos es igual o menor al 60 por ciento del ingreso medio del estado, podrías calificar para recibir ayuda para pagar tus recibos de servicios públicos. Ayuda Adicional: Massachusetts también cuenta con recursos disponibles para ayudar a sus residentes con el pago de sus facturas de servicios públicos y la renta. Comunícate con la Agencia de Ayuda con la Renta de tu localidad para obtener más información llamando al 2-1-1. El Good Neighbor Energy Fund podría proporcionar asistencia financiera adicional con facturas de servicios públicos atrasadas. Visita MAGoodNeighbor.org. Más Información: Massachusetts 2-1-1: Mass211.org o llama al 2-1-1 Department of Public Utilities/ Departamento de Servicios Públicos: 877-886-5066 Residentes en el Hogar 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cantidad de Ingresos $42,411 $55,461 $68,511 $81,561 $94,610 $107,660 $110,107 $112,554 Residentes en el Hogar 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cantidad de Ingresos $115,001 $117,448 $119,895 $112,342 $124,788 $127,235 $129,682 $132,129 Apunta tu cámara aquí para más información. 800 Boylston St. Boston, Massachusetts 02199 News Release Global Demand Drives Winter Energy Supply Prices to Historic Highs Energy company highlights programs and assistance available to help customers BOSTON (November 18, 2022) – With energy prices at record highs this winter, Eversource is working to connect its customers with the many programs and services available to help manage their energy bill ahead of the January 1 electric supply rate change. While customers are facing rising costs in virtually all aspects of life, the energy company is reminding them of the variety of payment options and assistance programs including Budget Billing, New Start, Discount Rate and other state and federal resources. “We know how challenging increased energy costs are for our customers who are already frustrated with rising costs for other basic, daily needs, and we want to help them manage their energy bills as much as possible,” said Eversource Executive Vice President, Customer Experience and Energy Strategy Penni Conner. “We’re here to work with our customers one-on-one on ways to reduce their energy usage and connect them with assistance programs, flexible payment plans or other resources to help them manage their monthly bill. We also remind customers they can compare energy prices at Energy Switch Massachusetts and sign up with a competitive supplier for their energy supply if they choose.” The energy company filed new electricity prices from power suppliers for customers in Eastern Massachusetts with the Department of Public Utilities (DPU) that would be in effect from January 1, 2023, through June 30, 2023. If approved, the proposed Basic Service Rate for residential customers who receive their energy supply from Eversource would change from 17.9 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) to 25.6 cents per kWh, compared to approximately 15.8 cents per kWh last winter. On average, an Eversource residential electric customer who uses 600 kilowatt hours of power each month could see an increase of approximately 23% over their current monthly bill – or approximately $46.66 per month – on the supply portion of the bill. This updated energy supply rate is specific to Eversource electric customers in Eastern Massachusetts. An updated Basic Service Rate for customers in Western Massachusetts who receive their electric supply from Eversource was also submitted to the DPU this week. While adjustments to other components of the bill are also expected to take effect January 1, 2023, those changes are not yet final and rising supply costs will be the primary factor impacting customers’ total monthly bills. The supply rate change only applies to customers in Massachusetts who receive Eversource’s Basic Service Rate and not those who receive their energy supply from a municipal aggregation program or a competitive supplier, which is a majority of the energy company’s customers in the commonwealth. 800 Boylston St. Boston, Massachusetts 02199 In Massachusetts, the energy supply price changes twice a year – January 1 and July 1 – representing the cost that Eversource pays generators for the power that customers use. Eversource only charges customers what it pays generators for producing the power – it does not earn a profit on the cost of electricity. How much a customer pays will ultimately depend on how much energy is used, their rate category, and weather conditions. All Eversource customers have the option to buy their power from state-approved third-party suppliers or to receive the energy company’s Basic Service Rate. Customers can find out more information about competitive supplier rates at Energy Switch Massachusetts. As has been widely reported, energy costs continue to rise globally, with regional electric supply prices reaching all-time highs this year due to increased global demand for and the high cost of natural gas, world events, extreme weather, and other issues. Eversource is encouraging customers who are having difficulty paying their energy bills or want to learn more about what help is available to participate in an upcoming webinar on December 16th at noon. The webinar will include information about protection from service disconnection, programs to reduce unpaid balances with affordable monthly payments, extended payment plans and no-cost energy efficiency programs that can help lower energy usage. Advanced registration is required, and customers can sign up, as well as view a recording of a previous webinar, at www.Eversource.com/billhelp. Eversource (NYSE: ES), celebrated as a national leader for its corporate citizenship, is the #1 energy company in Newsweek’s list of America’s Most Responsible Companies for 2021 and recognized as one of America’s Most JUST Companies. Celebrated as a national leader for its corporate citizenship, Eversource transmits and delivers electricity and natural gas and supplies water to 1.8 million customers throughout Massachusetts, including approximately 1.46 million electric customers in 140 communities, 638,000 gas customers in 110 communities, and 8,900 water customers in five communities. Eversource harnesses the commitment of approximately 9,200 employees across three states to build a single, united company around the mission of safely delivering reliable energy and water with superior customer service. The #1 energy efficiency provider in the nation, the company is empowering a clean energy future in the Northeast, with nationally recognized energy efficiency solutions and successful programs to integrate new clean energy resources like solar, offshore wind, electric vehicles and battery storage, into the electric system. For more information, please visit eversource.com, and follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. For more information on our water services, visit aquarionwater.com. CONTACT: Priscilla Ress 413-787-1055 priscilla.ress@eversource.com ### November 18, 2022 Dear Members of the Select Board, We are writing to you as members of the Historic District Committee to implore you to reconsider our current virtual status. Our committee is unique in that we address site plans, architectural drawings, demolition and addition requests as well as solar panel positioning and signage, all in the context of our historic mission. We very much rely on each other to identify and support decision making that will continue to keep the historic character Brewster requires and deserves. We have been meeting virtually since the Covid pandemic forced us to discontinue in person meetings. As the only town in the Historic District not yet allowing in person meetings, we would like you to permit us to meet in person. We have tried a hybrid format (committee members in person -applicants virtual), twice we were locked out of the Town Hall. twice there were technical difficulties and our meetings had to be rescheduled. Our work for the Town, when we are in person. is made more efficient and thus enable us to do a better job. The applicants who come before us should have the right to discuss their proposals in person. We are under a required deadline of 45 days to come to a determination on all applications and in person meetings would definitely facilitate that goal. Please consider our request. Jim Trabulsie Pat Busch Tom Turcketta Carol Appleton Steve Bergquist George Carey Bow Hunting in the Punkhorn Parklands – December 5 through December 24 Following a positive May 2022 Town Meeting vote to allow bow hunting in the Punkhorn Parklands, the Boards and Commissions with care and custody of the properties in the Punkhorn Parklands designated the area in which bow hunting is allowed. This designated area will be open for bow hunting only, beginning Monday, December 5th and ending on Saturday, December 24th. Please study the maps of the designated areas to be aware of where hunting in Brewster is permitted and where it is prohibited. A local permit from the Town Clerk’s office is required in order to hunt. Hunting is not permitted on Sundays in Massachusetts. To prepare for the season, hunters must pay attention to the updated 2022-2023 Brewster Hunting Regulations. The safety of hunters and non-hunters is of paramount importance during hunting season. Hunters must read the state’s hunting regulations. Non- hunters should also review the list of safety tips provided by the state. HARWICH ELBOW POND WALKER'S POND UPPER MILL POND SEYMOUR PONDSLOUGH POND ARCHIESCTWY BLA CK DUCK CTW Y WESTGATERD EAGLEPOINT CTWY RED MAPLE RD LOWER MILL POND CANOE POND PUNKHORN RD CRA NVIEWRD SQUANTOSPATH Road Proposed Hunting Area Hunting Prohibited 0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet Proposed Hunting Area in thePunkhorn ParklandsBREWSTER C O N S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N N DAJ Í MassGIS Rev: 11/23/22 HARWICH FREEMANS WAY ROUTE 137 ROUTE6 Road Prohibited (Hunting Setback) Designated Hunting AreaÍ01,250 2,500625 Feet Designated Hunting Zone in Southeast Brewster Aquifer Protection Area B R E W S T E R C O N S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N MassGIS N DAJ REV: 11/23/22 B R E W S T E R C O N S E R VAT I O N C O M M I S S I O N Designated Hunting Zone inMothers Bog Aquifer Protection Area SLOUGHROAD ELBOW POND HA R WI C H Road Designated Hunting Area Hunting Prohibited ±DAJ MassGIS 0 500 1,000250 Feet DENNIS REV: 11/23/22 2022-2023 Brewster Hunting Regulations The Conservation Commission has certain town owned lands under its care, custody and control, for the protection of open space and natural resources. As provided in the Massachusetts General Laws; Conservation Commission Act of 1957 G. L. Ch. 40: § 8C. Conservation Commission; establishment; powers and duties; and G. L. Ch. 131: § 59. Reservations, parks, public lands; hunting… - the Conservation Commission has the authority to make decisions on recreational uses such as hunting on these lands. It is the policy of the Brewster Conservation Commission each year, to review the wildlife and safety information and vote on this issue. General Regulations: A. Hunting is prohibited on all Town properties except those defined in these attached maps, and is subject to the regulations set by the board holding care and custody of these lands (Water Commissioners, Conservation Commissioners, Select Board). B. The parcels are described as the Punkhorn Hunting Area, Meetinghouse Road Parcels and Freemans Way South parcels. C. Hunting in these defined areas requires a written permit which may be obtained at the Town Clerk’s Office. You must present your state hunting permit to obtain the town permit. This permit may be revoked at any time for any infraction of these regulations. D. Hunting on private property requires written permission of the owner or legal occupant. E. The holder of a town hunting permit is responsible for knowing and following all state and town hunting regulations and for knowing and honoring the boundaries of the areas defined in the attached maps. F. The Boards and Commissions with care and custody of the properties in the Punkhorn Parklands voted to authorize hunting in a new area of the Punkhorn Parklands, with specific restrictions. This area is approximately 200 acres in size and includes lands under the care and custody of the Conservation Commission, Select Board, and Water Commissioners, who each voted similarly. This area is posted with Seasonal Hunting signs and is subject to state mandated buffer zones, including no hunting areas of 150 feet off roads (Westgate Road, Squantos Path, Punkhorn Road, and the access road to the water department well), as wells as a 500 foot no hunting buffer from the homes to the west along Westgate Road, the Water Department well house in the center of this area, and homes south of Squantos Path. Hunting is authorized from Monday December 5th 2022 until Saturday December 24th 2022 excepting Sundays, and is restricted to bow hunting for deer only. A map illustrating these buffers and the seasonal hunting area in the Punkhorn Parklands will be posted on kiosks in the Punkhorn Parklands, in the lobby of the Natural Resources Department, and will be provided to people purchasing the town hunting permit. The rest of the Punkhorn Parklands is designated Hunting Prohibited. G. Deer and wild turkey hunting in the Meetinghouse Road Parcels is permitted for archery and primitive arms from tree stands only. No hunting allowed until the hunter is in his tree stand. No other hunting or hunting seasons are authorized on these lands. Water Department lands within these two parcels will be regulated in accordance with this Conservation Commission hunting policy. H. The Freemans Way South parcels consist of Water Department lands and Conservation Commission lands. These properties are open for general hunting in accordance with the policy of the Brewster Water Commissioners. I. Water Department lands in other areas and north of Freemans Way are not authorized for hunting. Use of Tree Stands on Town Property A. All tree stands on Town property must be registered with the Brewster Department of Natural Resources identifying the area they are located (Punkhorn Hunting Area, Meetinghouse Road Parcels, Freemans Way South parcels). B. All tree stands must be labelled with the owner’s name. C. Tree stands cannot be permanently fastened to the tree with lags, screws, nails, or bolts. Screw in pegs, posts or handles that pierce the tree are not permitted. Only ladder stands, strap-on stands and climbing sticks are to be used. D. Tree stand placement must follow a minimum setback of 500 feet from any dwelling and a 150 foot setback from any named road or town mapped hiking trail. No hunting is allowed in this setback area. E. Tree stands may be in place not more than 20 days before the deer hunting season. F. All tree stands must be removed no later than 20 days after deer hunting season ends. G. Tree stands used for spring turkey hunting may be placed no more than 20 days prior to the beginning of the season and must be removed within 20 days after the end of the season. H. Any tree stand found without a registered name, or in place outside of the above listed date limits, will be removed. Waterfowl Hunting In accordance with MGL Ch. 131; § 45, an individual with proper licenses may hunt waterfowl in and around the great ponds located in Brewster. The boundary for hunting activities on lands under the care and custody of the Brewster Conservation Commission is 5 feet beyond the mean high water mark or elevation of the pond. All state regulations and setback requirements must be observed. Anyone found in violation of these hunting regulations may have their town hunting permit revoked for the remainder of the hunting season. Repeated violations will be subject to a longer ban. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. C.131 S. 40) Brewster Conservation Commission Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law Chapter 172 Notice to Abutters Date: 11/28/2022 To: Abutters of property located at: 351 Point of Rocks Road Assessors' Map 79 , Parcel 23 , Formerly Map , Parcel From: Custom Construction Services , Applicant Owner of Property: Heintzelman Properties LLC. In accordance with the requirements of G.L c. 131, §40, Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and Section 5, the Town of Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law, this is notification to you that a filing has been submitted to the Brewster Conservation Commission on behalf of the applicant for a proposed project at the above captioned location. The Project includes the following: The proposed work will occur within 50 feet of: Inland Wetlands Coastal Wetlands The project will occur within an Inland Wetland. The project will occur within a Coastal Wetland. The information and plans for the project may be reviewed between 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM, Tuesday through Thursday, at the Conservation Department, Brewster Town Offices, 1657 Main Street. Electronic copies may be requested as an alternative. A public hearing will be held Tuesday, December 27 , 20 22 Until further notice, due to the Covid pandemic, meetings will be held by remote participation. Hearings begin at 6:00 PM. The hearing notice will be publicized in the Cape Codder Newspaper no less than five (5) days prior to the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Brewster Conservation Department at 896-4546, between the hours of 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM. Sincerely, Robert Reedy, P.E. Representative for Applicant