Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12) 7G Award of Consultant Services Agreement with Elie Farah Inc. - Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Project, CIP No. P13-12AGENDA ITEM 7.G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: July 16, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Jose E. Pulido, City ManagetA Via: Mark Persico, AICP, Community Development Director, By: Andrew Coyne, Management Analyst SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ELIE FARAH INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES FOR BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (BTA) PROJECT, CIP NO. P13-12 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to: a) Review and approve a Consultant Services Agreement with Elie Farrah Inc. for the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Project; and b) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Consultant Services Agreement with Elie Farah, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $29,980. BACKGROUND: 1. On March 15, 2011, City Council approved the Citywide Bicycle Transportation Master Plan, which provides a broad vision, strategies, and actions to improve conditions for bicycling in Temple City. 2. On April 27, 2012, the City submitted a grant application to Caltrans for a Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) project and allocated 10% of the project costs as matching funds for much needed bicycle infrastructure improvements, including Class II and III bicycle lanes and a bicycle boulevard, which would help to connect new and proposed bikeway systems in adjacent municipalities and in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. City Council July 16, 2013 Page 2 of 3 3. On December 3, 2012, the City entered into an agreement with Caltrans for the allocation of Bicycle Transportation Account funds to the City in the amount of $479,987 for the construction of 12.6 miles of Class II and III bicycle lanes and a bicycle boulevard. 4. On May 30, 2013, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the Bicycle Transportation Account (i.e., State funded) project, which allowed interested firms to submit proposals to the City by June 28, 2013. 5. On June 4, 2013, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14 City Budget, which included an allocation of $479,900 BTA funds and $48,350 General Funds. The $48,350 is the City's 10% share of the cost to implement the project. 6. On June 11, 2013, the City published a public notice in the Pasadena Star News advertising the City's Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the Bicycle Transportation Account (i.e., State funded) project (Attachment "A"). 7. On June 17, 2013, a "Clarifications to Questions" (Attachment "B") was issued by the City to provide a response to four questions submitted by the interested parties and was posted on the City's website. 8. On June 28, 2013, the Community Development Department received a total of three proposals from Elie Farah, Inc., KOA Corporation, and Quantum Quality Consulting, Inc. 9. On July 1, 2013, all three firms were contacted and advised to submit revised proposals removing the bicycle lanes from Las Tunas Drive, as the bicycle lanes are being included in the Las Tunas Drive Safety and Beautification Project. 10. On July 2, 2013, all three firms submitted revised proposals. 11. On July 3, 2013, The City's Selection Committee (i.e., City Engineer Cayir, Public Safety and Services Manager Sahagun, and Community Preservation Officer Aceves) completed their review of the three proposals received by the City and selected Elie Farah, Inc. (Attachments "C" and "D"). ANALYSIS: Over the past several years, Temple City has been making the City more bike -friendly. The adoption of the Bicycle Master Plan in 2011 established a long term blueprint for the creation of an integrated system of bike lanes. The award of the BTA grant by Caltrans in 2012 has allowed the City to make progress in fulfilling its vision. Awarding City Council July 16, 2013 Page 3 of 3 the consultant services agreement for engineering and design is the first step toward installation of the bike lanes. After the design phase is complete, an RFP will be issued for installation of the improvements. City Council will be asked to approve an Award of Contract for the installation of the bike lanes. The process will be similar to the contract currently under consideration. Staff anticipates that the bike lanes will be installed by August 2014. Based on staff's review and cost analysis of the revised proposals, staff recommends that the City Council retain the professional services of Elie Farah, Inc. for the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the Bicycle Transportation Account (i.e., State funded) to construct 12.6 miles of Class II and III bicycle lanes and a bicycle boulevard. Elie Farah, Inc. was selected based on the project cost, professional references, and experience. Elie Farah, Inc. has over 28 years of experience in the fields of civil and traffic engineering, land surveying, and construction management. They have a diversified background as they have served as city engineers, plan checkers, and design engineers with various cities. Elie Farah, Inc. has completed plans for bicycle lanes and pathways for several regional jurisdictions including San Diego County and the Cities of Oceanside and Rosemead. CONCLUSION: In order to kick off this project, the City Council is requested to accept the bid for the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for Bicycle Transportation Account (i.e., State funded) project submitted by Elie Farah, Inc. in the amount of $29,980 as the lowest, responsive, and responsible bid, and authorize the City Manager to execute a Consultant Services Agreement with Elie Farah, Inc (Attachment "E"). FISCAL IMPACT: On June 4, 2013, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14 City Budget, which included $479,900 BTA funds and $48,350 General Funds in the Capital Improvement Program for this project (CIP # P13-12). ATTACHMENTS: A. RFP for Preparation of PS&E for Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Project B. Clarifications to Questions C. Elie Farah, Inc. Proposal D. Elie Farah, Inc. Revised Proposal E. Agreement between the City of Temple City and Elie Farah, Inc. ATTACHMENT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; BTA 1213 -07 -LA -18 IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY May 30, 2013 DELIVERY ADDRESS Community Development Department 9701 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780 Attn: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director PROPOSALS SUBMITTAL 3 copies CONTACT INFORMATION FOR INQUIRIES contact via e-mail only, no telephone calls Selim Bouhamidi Project Coordinator selim.bouham idiPtranstech.org PROPOSALS DUE June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; BTA 1213 -07 -LA -18 IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY May 30, 2013 To interested d consultants: The City Temple City is seeking proposals from qualified consultants to provide engineering services for preparation of PS&E for BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT. Enclosed, is a copy of the Request for Proposals (RFP). Scope of Work Description: Provide engineering services for preparation of PS&E for the project in compliance with the approved funding program scope of work. Pre -Proposal Meeting: None. Questions: For questions regarding this project, please contact via e-mail only: Selim Bouhamidi, Project Coordinator selim.bouhamidi(cDtranstech.ore Proposal Submittal: Interested consultants can submit their proposals in compliance with the attached RFP requirements as indicated below: Submit your proposal by the following due date: June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm Submit your proposal by delivering 3 copies to: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 RFP release authorized by: Mark Persico, AICP, Community Development Director r\wPFDCEssUGRII0'SWI\13111 rccers wNOING AuocnnON PACKAaE� VV E\DESIGN OaOFFP FOR FOR DESIGNS CI VC[EE, TCAPLE my Doc RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, BTA PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; BTA 1213 -07 -LA -18 IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY May 30, 2013 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK The City of TEMPLE CITY is soliciting Proposals (hereinafter referred to as RFP) from qualified consultants to provide engineering design services to prepare PS&E for BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT, IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. The scope of work for the project includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1. The scope of work provided in this RFP shall be used as a guideline; however, it is the consultant's responsibility to provide all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. • Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. • Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create a base map of existing conditions. • Prepare plans and details. Design shall be in accordance with Chapter 1000, Bikeway Planning and Design of the Highway Design Manual that describes minimum statewide design standards for bikeways and roads where bicycle travel is permitted and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices that describes the uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices. • Prepare specifications. • Prepare cost estimates. • Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. • Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. • Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. • Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: o First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. o City will take 2 weeks for the review. o Final submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review comments. • Provide bi-weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. • Attend 3 project meetings. Final Product: PS&E Bid Package ready for bidding, including 1 wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, MsWord file of Specifications, Excel file of Estimates, pelf file of all other documents. RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, BTA PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 2 Note: City will be responsible for Public Outreach & Education, Construction management, Inspection Components of the Project 2. REQUIRED FORMAT FOR PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL Proposals shall not exceed 25 pages in length, and shall include the following information: • Cover Letter: Not to exceed 2 pages (not counted as part of 25 page limit). • Table of Contents (not counted as part of 25 page limit). A. Scope of Work: The Consultant shall include in its proposal a detailed scope of work and understanding of the process to undertake such projects and complete it in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations, standards and requirements. B. Project Staff Qualifications: Provide an organization chart showing the names and responsibilities of key personnel. Provide resumes of key personnel identified in the organization chart. C. References: Provide 3 public agency references for past similar projects. D. Company Qualifications: Provide a summary of your firm's general qualifications and service capabilities. E. Fee. Provide a detailed fee by tasks and staff. 3. QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES For questions regarding this project, please contact via e-mail only: Selim Bouhamidi Project Coordinator selim.bouhamidi(@transtech.ore Responses will be posted 10 days prior to the proposal submittal deadline on City's website under the RFPs/RFQs section fhtto://www.ci.temole-citv.ca.us/RFPs%20RFOs/RFOs.asn 4. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL PROTOCOL Submit your proposal by the following due date: June 28, 2013, 4:00 pm Submit your proposal by delivering 3 copies to: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, BTA PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 3 Required copies of Proposal: 3 copies S. CONSULTANT SELECTION The City will evaluate the proposals submitted, and select the most qualified consultant for the project. The proposals will be evaluated based upon several factors. These factors include the format, organization, and presentation of the proposal, the qualification and experience of the project staff, and the experience in the processes and procedures of the involved regulations. In evaluating the proposals, the City will considerthe following factors: • Completeness of the Proposals and compliance with the required format. • Project understanding, scope and approach to develop the project efficiently. • Knowledge in Public Agency Procedures and Requirements. • Experience in similar projects. • Experience and qualifications of the firm and the project team members. • Experience in the funding requirements and process to be followed. • References and performance records on similar assignments. The City will negotiate final scope and fee with the most qualified consultant. 6. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The City of Temple City shall not be liable for any pre -contractual expenses incurred by any proposing firm (proponent) in response to this RFP, nor shall any proponent include such expenses as part of the proposed cost. Pre -contractual expenses include any expense incurred in preparing a proposal and negotiating any terms with the City. 2. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice and to reject any and all proposals submitted without indicating any reasons. Any award of contract for services will be made to the proponent that is best qualified and responsive in the opinion of the City. 3. Proposals may, at the City's option, be rejected if they contain any alterations, additions, conditions or alternatives, are incomplete, or contain erasures or irregularities of any kind. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone the opening of submittals for its own convenience and to reject any and all submittals responding to this Request for Proposals. 4. Consultant must agree to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and assigns from any and all liability or loss resulting from any suits, claims or actions brought against the City which result directly or indirectly from the wrongful or negligent actions of the Consultant in the performance of the contract. 5. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) annual aggregate; and automobile liability insurance in an amount not less than RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, BTA PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 4 $1,000,000 per accident. (A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount not less than $2,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits for each of the foregoing.) Where Consultant is required to carry professional liability insurance covering liability arising from any error, omission or negligent act of Consultant, its officers, or employees, Consultant shall procure and maintain such coverage with a limit of liability of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. All such insurance coverages shall be procured from an insurer authorized to do business in California and approved in writing by the City. The City shall be named as an additional insured. In addition, the Consultant and sub- contractors, if any, shall obtain workers' compensation insurance covering all its employees as required by law. Throughout the term of the contract, the Consultant shall deliver to the City satisfactory evidence that the insurance has been renewed and that the required premiums have been paid. 6. Consultant will be required to comply with all existing state and federal labor laws including those applicable to equal opportunity employment provisions. Consultant is required to have in full force and affect all licenses and permits required by all applicable laws. Consultant shall obtain a Temple City Business License during the term of the contract. 8. Consultant shall at all times provide services with the utmost respect to the public. All employees of Consultant shall wear clean clothing in the performance of their duties and equipment shall be cleaned and maintained in a safe operating manner. All equipment shall be subject to inspection by the City at any time. All Consultant personnel shall wear appropriate safety gear at all times while working in Temple City. Consultant shall provide satisfactory warning devices that meet the requirements of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act (Cal -OSHA) for protection of workers when and where required at all times in the performance of this contract. 9. Consultant, its agents, and employees shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of the federal and state governments, the County of Los Angeles, the City of Temple City and all governing bodies having jurisdiction applying to work done underthe agreement. 10. The City reserves the right to negotiate special requirements and proposed service levels using the selected proposal as a basis. Compensation for services will be negotiated with the Consultant. 11. Consultant shall not sublet any portion of the agreement with the City without express written permission of the City Manager or his or designated representative. 12. No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons because of the race, color, or religion of such persons and every proposer in violation of this section is subject to all penalties imposed for a violation of Chapter 1 of Part VII, Division 2 of the Labor Code, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1753 thereof. 13. The City reserves the right to review and approve the qualifications of subcontracting firms or persons. Substitutions that are not approved are considered sufficient grounds for termination of contract. RFP FOR PREPARATION OF Ps&E, BTA PROJECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 5 14. The City, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy or transcribe any pertinent transaction, activity, tittle and work records, employment records or other records relating to personnel employed by the Consultant. Such material, including all pertinent cost accounting, financial records and proprietary data, will be kept and maintained by the Consultant for a period of at least four years after completion of a Consultant's performance unless the City's written permission is given to dispose of same prior to that time. 15. All responses to this RFP shall become the property of the City of Temple City and will be retained or disposed of accordingly. 16. No amendments, additions, or alternates shall be accepted after the submission deadline. 17. All documents, records, designs, and specifications developed by the Consultant in the course of providing services to the City of Temple City shall be the property of the City. Anything considered to be proprietary should be so designated by the Consultant. 18. Acceptance by the City of any qualification submitted pursuant to this RFP shall not constitute any implied intent to enter into a contract for services. 19. The City reserves the right to issue written notice to all interested parties of any change in the qualification submission schedule should the City determine, in its sole discretion, that such changes are necessary. Attachment l: Funding Documents Attachment 2: City Standard Contract RPP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, STA PROSECT—TEMPLE CITY RFP, Cover Letter, Page 6 Attachment 1: Funding Documents April 27, 2012 Kirk Cessna Office of Local Assistance District 7 100 South Main Los Angeles, CA 90012 RE: Bicycle Transportation Account Grant Application (BTA) Citywide Improvements Phase I Dear Mr. Cessna: It is with great pleasure that we submit the City of Temple City's BTA application for the 2012- 2013 Grant Cycle for Citywide Improvements Phase I. This project will create a safe bicycle network in the City of Temple City and will benefit bicycle commuters by accommodating motor vehicles and bicycle traffic on residential and arterial streets. The City of Temple City is excited for the possibility of funding. It could provide us an opportunity to implement much needed infrastructure improvements that will support bicycling as an alternative mode of transportation. Furthermore, the proposed facilities will connect to both existing and proposed bikeway systems in adjacent municipalities and in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. With secured funding the City will be able to deliver a project that will provide a bicycle network that provides local and regional benefit. Enclosed is the original application with one copy, along with a CD with the electronic copy. An electronic copy was sent to Deborah Lynch at deborah lvnchQdot.ca.sov. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (909) 979- 6583 should you have any questions regarding our submittal. Regards, —44 —1�4— Robert Beckman Program Manager (Avant -Garde, hic.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 0412012) I. APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Agency. City of Temple City Responsible City or County: City of Temple City Applicant Agency Address: 9701 Las Tuuas Drive City: Temple City Icounty: Los Angeles Contact Person: Steve Masura - Title: Community Development Director Phone: (626)285-2171 IE -mail: smasura@templecity.us Assembly Senate Member District No. Member Anthony J. Portantino 4 Carol Liu II. PROJECT SCREENING CRITERIA A. Local Match IState: CA (Zip Code: 91780 District No. 21 7 1. Is the required resolution committing the applicant to the minimum 10% local match included with the application package? Y n N ❑ Caltrans District B. California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Note: BTA projects must be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by the BTA application submittal date. The lead agency is responsible for preparing the required environmental documentation and submityrig it with the application. 1. Is documentation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance (signed and dated) included with the application package? Y ❑ N C. Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) ❑X What Is the title of the BTP the applicant is using to establish eligibility for BTA funding? Bicycle Master Plan X] Date BTP was adopted by applicant's goveming body: 03/15/2011 ❑X Whatis the name of the applicant's Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA)? Los Angeles County Metro I] Date BTP was approved, adopted, or certified by RTPA: 04/04/2011 ❑X Please list the pages In the BTP that the proposed project is identified. 42,47 & 49 Attach BTP page with project to BTA application. D. Prior BTA Funding - SHO 893.4. If available funds are insufficient to finance completely any project whose eligibility is established..., the project shall retain its priority for allocations in subsequent fiscal years. Was another part or segment of this project funded in a previous BTA cycle? [-]YES ❑X NO If yes, what cycle? Does Responsible Local Agency have BTA awards active? ❑X YES ❑ NO If yes, List BTA Award Numbers BTA 1112 -07 -LA -05 11. PROJECT SCREENING CRITERIA Project Title: ICitywide Bikeway Improvements Phase I Project Type: (Class I Bikeway ❑ IClass II Bikeway ❑X IClass III Bikeway❑X I Other ❑X ADA Notice For individuals with sensory dlsabillties, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit21-B (REV. 02/2012) Projectlocation: "Bikeway" Example: Along abandoned railroad right-ef--way from Apricot Street to Elm Street. "Other" Example: Update bike map with datailed information on routes in South Bay region. Temple City lies within Los Angeles County in the West San Gabriel Valley. Its neighboring cities are Arcadia to the north, EI Monte to the southeast, and Rosemead to the southwest Temple City borders unincorporated county lands on its west and east borders, The City boundaries encompass approximately four square miles. Proposed bikeways will provide north -south and east -west connections in the City of Temple City and adjacent jurisdictions. The project will include 4.8 miles of Class II lanes on EI Monte Ave and Las Tunas Drive, 5.2miles of Class III routes on Golden West Avenue, Adren Drive, Longden Avenue, Lemon Avenue and Oak Avenue and lastly, 2.54 miles of Freer and Olive Street will be designated as bike boulevards. Type of Work; - -- "Bikeway Example: Design and construct a Class I Bikeway. "Other" Example: Purchase and install front -mount bicycle racks on all regional buses. The proposed projected will construct approximately 12.6 miles of Class II, Class III and bicycle boulevard. Including installation of striping, signage and sixty (60) end of trip facilities comprised of thirty (30) u shaped bicycle racks and thirty (30) artistic bicycle racks. The project will also include an educational component designed to supplement infrastructure improvements and encourage people to bicycle safely and more frequently. _ Project Description: The proposed project will construct approximately 12.6 miles of bikeways along residential and major arterial streets and provide north -south and east -west connections in the City of Temple City and adjacent jurisdictions. The project will include 4.8 miles of Class II lanes on EI Monte Ave and Las Tunas Drive, 5.2 miles of Class III routes on Golden West Avenue, Adren Drive, Longden Avenue, Lemon Avenue and Oak Avenue and lastly, 2.54 miles of Freer and Olive Street will be designated as bike boulevards. Bike boulevards are similar to Class III bike routes but will receive additional treatment to enhance safety. The project will include sixty (60) end -of -trip facilities at all major trip attractions, including commercial centers,. parks, schools, government buildings and public transit locations; and will also include appropriate signage. The City will take further measures to improve safety for bicyclists by narrowing traffic lanes, eliminating parking, modifying traffic signals torecogaize bicyclists andstriping and stenciling bicycle lanes. The City will also be implementing an education campaign to supplement infrastructure improvements and encourage people to bicycle safely andmore frequently. Length I 12.6 (Miles) Estimated Cost: Note: Applicant agency must provide 10% (min/mum) of the totalproject cost. Funding Preliminary Construction I Right of Way Construction Total Total Source Engineering Engineering Acquisition Contract Amount Percent BTA $ 46,432 $ 30,955 $ $ 402,600 $ - — - 479,987 90% -- Local $ 5,159 $ 3,4391$ _ $ 44,733 $ Other $ $ $ $ - $ 53,331 10% Total $ 51,591 $ 34,3941$ $ 447,333 $ 533,318 1001_ Map and Cross Section Attachments: ❑K Attach a map to scale with north arrow showing the oroiect location. lenolh; limits, adiacent land uses. nc_tivity renters and ndalns and destinations served, U If this is an on -street bikeway project, Include cross-sections showing the roadway DrIor to and after project implementation. F1 If this is an off�street bikeway project include a cross-section. Project Schedule: - - -- - — - - Beginning Date Ending Date I Item Month/Year MonthiYear Comments CEQA Clearance 03/01/2011 Notice of Exemption has been completed. Right of Way Acquisition Not applicable Preliminary Engineering 08/01/2012 11/01/2012 Final Design 11/01/2012 Advertise Project 12/17/2012 02/01/2013 Award Construction 03/0I/2013 -- ' Submit Final Invoice 10/01/2013 ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available In alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 orwrite Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-8 (REV. 02/2012) IV. EVALUATION CRITERIA. Street and Highway Code Section 893 requires Caltrans to disburse money "...from the Blevcle Transportation Account_. for oroiects that improve the safety and convenience of bicvcle commuters." Street and Highways Code Section 890.3 defines bicycle commuter as "...a person makino n fia by bicvcle primarily for transportation ourooses;Jnclud'nil not limited m- travel in workschool. shonoino_ _ or other desilnation that Is a center of activity and does not Include a Ido by bicvcle primarily for physical exercise or recreation without such a destination. The BTA Evaluation Committee evaluates applications as Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, or Ineligible according to the following criteria: How well has the annlicant demonstrated that the nroiect X❑ 1. Will be used primarily by bicycle commuters? FX 2. Has the potential to increase bicycle commuting? [X 3. Is the best alternative for the situation? 0 4. Improves bikeways and/or amenities that support bicycle commuting e.g., bicycle parking, lockers, showers, lighting, call boxes, maps, and bicycle ❑X 10. safety education programs. 0 5, Provides or improves bikeway continuity to activity centers such as public buildings, transit terminals, business districts, shopping centers, schools., ❑X 12. etc. X 8' Is consistent with the applicable GTP? Other rbnsideralinns 14. rased in evaLiatina BTA omiept annliratio�rs Include:. FX 7. Citizen and community involvement Q 8. Cost of project and cost-effectiveness 0 9. Geographic distribution ❑X 10. Projects Initiating a community bikeway network ❑X 11. Land use, population density, and settlement patterns ❑X 12. Local - State match ratio [X 13. Project readiness FX 14. Project type Class II & I I I (on -road) / Class I (off-road) / other O 15. Prior funding and project Implementation FXI 15. Urban/Rural balance 0 17. Transportation interface with other modes oftransportation 18. Trip purpose work, school, shop, social/recreational, other 0 19, Is applicant willing to accept partial funding? 20. Does BTA project conect to or become a partof a larger project or facility with a design not meeting HOM standards? ❑X' 21. Is facility open 24/7? If not what are the hours as use? And why isn't the facility always available? L How will the proposed project benefit bicycle commuters?: The project will create a safe bicycle network and will benefit bicycle commuters by creating a bicycle -friendly City that reduces traffic congestion and provides improved opportunities for bicycling and active transportation. Thecreation of citywide bicycle infrastructure will better accommodate cyclists by delineating the roadway right-of-way between motorized and non -motorized users. The proposed bicycle lanes will offer a range of facility types for beginner and expert bicyclist on regionally significant arterials and low- traffic, low -speed neighborhood bike routes. This project will also benefit bicycle commuters by saving them on high costs associated with automobile usage. According to completestreets.org, "Americans spent an average of 18 cents of every dollar on transportation, with the poorest fifth of families spending more than double that figure." Taking public transportation could save individuals $9,581 each year by eliminating automobile costs such as gasoline, maintenance and repair. This project will also ensure bicycle parking and facilities at all major trip attractions, including commercial and activity centers and transit hubs. Bicycle facilities and connections to other modes of transportation will help expand the geographical range of residents. Local and regional connections will provide an affordable means of getting to major trip attractions such as employment and shopping centers inside and outside the City. The bicycle network will provide a local route to businesses in Downtown Temple City and on Las Tunas Drive. Bikeways will also provide a connection to a proposed bikeway that will travel north on Rosemead Boulevard and connect to the Sierra Madre Villa Metro Station. This metro station provides a straight connection to the Downtown Los Angeles Area with stops in Old Town Pasadena, Pasadena, Highland Park and Lincoln Heights/ Cypress Park. ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write, Records and Fors Management, 1120N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STA'T'E OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARI MENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 0212012) 2. How acid the proposed project increase bicycle commuting'? The project will increase bicycle commuting by constructing the much needed facilities, educating the public about t'.rc facilities, encouraging their use and enforcing laws to protect those utilizing them. Community outreach conducted found that residents are frequently discouraged from riding a bike due to lack of experience and fear of sharing the road with motorists. Programs will be developed to increase bicycle commuting by giving children and adults the tools necessary to ride with confidence and a sense of security, By constructing bicycle specific facilities people will be more inclined to bike by designating a space ;or them on the roadway. The addition of end of trip facilities will also encourage people to bicycle by providing them with it safe place where they can park their bike to go to work, school, shop or to use public transit. The City will take further meas'zres to improve safety for bicyclists by narrowing traffic lanes, eliminating parking, modifying traffic sip tals to recognize bicyclist and striping and stenciling bicycle lanes. These improvements will encourage community members to bicycle. Members of the community will be more inclined to bicycle if they have a diverse array of design elements working to secure their safely. The proposed project will also develop a campaign to educate bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists about their legal rights and responsibilities on the road Education programs will supplement the infrastructure improvements and enable roadway users to understand how to travel safely and according to the law on bicycle ways. The City will also develop partnership programs with law enforcement agereies. Community members will be more inclined to choose bicycling as a transportation option if local law enforcement is taking extra measures to protect them from unsafe bicyclists and motorists. In addition to education and enforcement programs, the City of Temp)c City will develop encouragement, programs to promote residents to bicycle more frequently by providing incentives, recognition and services that make bicycling a more convenient transportation. mode. Other encouragement programs bring considered include: bicycle `.a work and school day and a share the road campaign. 3 Why is the proposed project the best alternative for the situation? The City contracted with Alta Plamiing to prepare a bicycle master plan to develop a community based vision for bicycle nerastmct,=. fhe plan provides direction for expanding the existing bikeway network, connecting gaps, and ensuring greater local and regional connectivity. This project will further the goals initiated by the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor Bikeway Project and further develop the City's bikeway system. As mentioned previously the existing infrastructure does not support bicycle commuters, therefore, the proposed project is the best alternative for the situatron. All proposed hikewery facilities have, been carefully selected by reviewing the roadway aid are compliant with MU FCD standards. Golden West Avenue, Arden Drive, Longden Avenue, Lemon Avenue and Oak Avenue are best suited for Class III bikeways because they are neighborhood roadways located in residential areas. They also meet all the Class III requirements as established under the MUTCD guidelines that require on -street parking and a speed limit that cannot exceed 35mph. Class Il bike lanes are more appropriate for arterial facilities and have therefore been selected for Inas Tunas and El Morrie Avenue, Class II bikeways require exclusive right of -way and do not have the same speed and parking restrictions airClass III. Also, the Class 11 facilities selected connect to existing and proposed bikeway facilities outside the city, which creates regional connectivity. Freer and (,)live Street will be constructed as Bicycle Boulevards because they are both low-trafficllow-volume si=ts'hat can accommodate bicyc"sts and motorists in the same travel lanes without specific bicycle lane delineation. The City is also working to create projects that will promote healthy living and help meet regional greenhouse gas reduction goals as established by SB 375. 'She ^vojecl is the best alternative for this situation. Replacing vehicular trips with bicycle trips will reduce human generated greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere that contribute to climate change. 4. Improves bikeways and or amenities that support bicycle communities (e.g., bicycle parking, lockers, showers, lighting, call boxes, snaps, and bicycle safely education programs.) 'the C'ityw'ide Bikeway Improvements Project improves bikeways and amenities by creating a citywide network of bikeways and ensuring bicycle parking at all major trip attractions, including commercial and activity centers and transit hubs. The project will further improve Ialceways and amenities by narrowing traffic lanes, eliminating parking, modifying traffic signals and striping bicycle lanes. The bicycle community reaches far beyond city limits and this project will support the greater bicycle community by connecting to regional facilities. Bicycle signage will also be instaaed and the City will incorporate the location of bicycle facilities and routes into their existing City guide map and will demonstrate regional connectivity including connections to a bikeway set to begin construction that will travel north on Rosemead Boolevard, which connects to file Sierra Madre Villa Metro Station as well as the Eaton Canyon Wash Bike Path, which will ultimately coinfect to the Rio Hondo Bike Path. The proposed project will also develop a campaign to educate bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists about their legal rights and responsibilities on the road, Education programs will supplement the infrastructure improvements and enable roadway users to understand how to ti avcl sal and according to the law an bikeways. Installation of the facilities is most important, however, one of the most effective ways to support bicycle communities and encourage people to bicycle is to distribute maps and guides to show that the infrastructure ex3,tsr der_-cnstrate holy bikes can easily access different locations in the City and highlight unique areas, shopping districts and recreational areas. ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disnbilities, mss document is evadable in alternate formats. For information call (910) 654.0"410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or wnte liecords and Furms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -39. Sacramento, QA 95814 STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 02/2012) 5. Provides o7 improves bikeway continuity to activity centers such as IiA[c; buildings and transit terminals. The proposed bike lanes will connect to existing large bicycle systems by expanding route continuity and provide direct connection to. the EI Monte Metro Station, the Eaton Canyon Wash Bike Path, Sierra Madre Gold Line, commercial centers, schools, libraries, places of worship and other incorporated activity centers within the City and adjacent jurisdictions. The bicycle network will provide a local route to businesses in Downtown Temple City and an Las Tunas Drive. Bikeways will also provide a connection to a proposed bikeway that will travel north on Rosemead Boulevard and connect to the Sierra Madre Villa Metro Station. This metro station provides a straight connection to the Downtown Los Angeles Area with stops in Old Town Pasadena, Pasadena, Highland Park and Lincoln Heights/Cypress Park. The project will also provide a connection to the Eaton Canyon Wash on Longden Avenue and Temple City Boulevard. The Eaton Canyon Wash Bike Path is a project identified in the Los Angeles County Bicycle Master Plan that will provide 2.6 miles of Class I bike paths through Temple City. The entire 7.7 mile Eaton Wash Bike Path spans to the Cities of Pasadena, San Gabriel, Rosemead and EI Monte. Ultimately, the Eaton Wash Bike Path will connect to the existing Rio Hondo Bike Path which will then connect to the EI Monte Station. The project will also provide improvedcontinuity and connection to other various facilities including sixteen (16) transit stops located throughout the City, the Elm Shopping Center on Las Tunas Drive and Rosemead, the Temple City Square Shopping Center and Gateway Plaza on Longden and Rosemead Boulevard, and a large commercial sector in Downtown Temple City on Las Tunas Drive. There are also seven (7) childcare centers, two (2) Parks, the Temple City Library and seventeen (17) schools (K-12) that the project will provide access to. 6. Is consistent with the applicable BTP7 The proposed project is consistent with the City of Temple City's Bicycle Master Plan. In addition, as required by the California Streets and Highway Code, Section 591.2, the plan fulfills the requirements outlined in the State Code and has been approved and certified by Los Angeles County Metro. 7. Citizen and community Involvement Community involvement and participation was vital to the development of the City's Bicycle Master Plan. This plan accounts for information collected from community members via public workshops and online surveys, including typical trip origins and destinations, desired facilities and existing bicycle behavior. As part of the City's outreach efforts for the plan an on-line survey was conducted. The survey was uploaded on the City's website and advertised on the Pasadena Star news, the Temple City Tribune, local businesses, cycling groups, schools and community groups. In order to encourage residents to take the online survey the City partnered with Temple City Bike Shop and awarded a road bike and several gift cards. The survey received more than 300 responses from current and potential bicycle users. The survey responses clearly indicate that current and potential cyclists have concerns about existing roadway conditions and how cyclists interact with vehicular traffic. Responses also showed a great desire for bicycle boulevards, bicycle facilities and bicycle programs that raised public awareness and promoted good roadway behavior. Many of the proposed facilities were requested by the public through the online survey. The proposed Bicycle Master Plan was presented for public input and review on March 9th, 2011 at a joint meeting of the City's Planning and Public Safety Commission. The meeting was held at 7:30 p.m, in the City Council Chambers, which is located next door to the local public library and City Hall. Its location and time made it convenient for people to attend since most of the residents are familiar with this location and an evening accommodated attendee's work schedules. The City performed extensive outreach to inform the City's residents of the meeting including posting in the Pasadena Star news, the Temple City Tribune and distributing press releases to local community organizations, cycling groups, schools and on the City's website. In addition to the survey results, residents that attended the meeting strongly supported the City's efforts for the bikeway improvements. Their main concerns were safety,. end -of -trip facilities, connectivity and cost. Furthermore, the City has garnered support letters for this project from the Chamber of Commerce, the local Sheriffs department, the Bicycle Coalition, Assembly Member Portantino, the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors and the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. ADA Notice For Individuals with sensory disabllities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 6546410 or TDD (916) 654-3680 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPA.RThtENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhiblt 21-B (REV. 02/2012) 8. Cost of protect and cost-effectiveness The Citvwide Bikeway Phase I improvements have been selected and designed to meet the needs identified for the project area. -I fie estimated construction cost of the project is $447,333, which includes narrowing traffic lathes, eliminating parking, modifying traffic signals to recognize bicyclists, str-ping and stenciling bicycle lanes and sixty (60) end of trip facilities comprised of thirty- ('10) it shaped "bicycle racks and thirty - (30) artistic bicycle racks. In an effort to increase the effectiveness of the project an educational component designed to supplement infrastructure improvements and encourage people to bicycle safely and more frequently is also included as part of the construction cost. All, proposed bikeway facilities have been selected based on their effectiveness for each location and to comply with MUTCD standards. Roadways were not desigtied to include unnecessary facilities, for example Golden West Avenue, Arden Drive, Longden Avenue, Lemon Avenue and Oak Avorme are best suited for Class III bikeways because they arc neigbborhood roadways'.ocated in residential areas. They also meet all the Class III requirements as established under the MUI'CD guidelines that require on -street parking and a speed limit that camtot exceed 35mph. Based on these fours the madways were designed as Class III bikeways rather than over over -designing exm as Class II bikeways. Class Il bike lanes are more appropriate for arterial streets and have therefore been selected for Las Tunas and Lf Monte Avenue. Freer and Olive Street will be censtruc:ed as B1oycle Boulevards because they are both low-trafftorlow-volume steno's that can accommodate bicyclists and motorists in the same travel lanes without specific bicycle lana delineation. The cost effectiveness of the project is ldrther realized through its connections -o existing and proposed bicycle fac:Eties including the Eaton Canyon Wash Bike Path and the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor Bikeway Improvements by takmn advantage of past and present expenditures. 9. Geographic distribution The Citywide Bikmvay Phase I project has been strategically designed to create a bikeway network tart is evenly distributed across the City of Temple City, providing access to facilities and services citywide, As previously described, design of the project consisted of strategically locking at local streets including the needs and warranted facilities. Taking, these faels into account, the project was designed to fulfill those requirements and provide facilities throughout the conummity. 'Che project has also been strategically designed to connect with existing, and proposed regional bikeways to expand upon the network and take advantage of past and future investments by multiple other agencies. Through review and consideration of existing and fixture regional facilities the project was designed to leverage investments and offer a geographic, distribution that allows connection throughout the City and the region. 10. Project initia4ng a community bikeway network The City of Temple City proposes a vision for a diverse regicnal bicycle system of interconnected bicycle corridors, support facilities and programs to make bicycling more practical and desirable to abroad range of residents. The proposed project will create a community bikeway network by connecting existing and proposed facilities within the City and throughout the region. As previously discussed tlrc project will connect to existing large bicycle systems by expanding route continuity and providing direct connection to the EI Monte Metro Station, the Eaton Canyon Wash Bike Path, Sierra Madre Gold Line, commercial centers, schools, libraries, places of worship and other incorporated activity centers within the City and adjacent jurisdictions. 'fire City of Temple City experienced 7 bicycle and velricle .:oliisions from 2000-2008 (SWITRS). -Chis project will better accommodate cyclists by providing sate and exclusive bicycle lanes that are delineated, striped and stenciled on the roadway. This will significantly reduce the risk of vehicle and bicycle collbi;ms. the prejec: design also aligns with the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor Bikeway Improvements Project, which is the, frst of its kind in the City, as well as with the County of Los Angeles' bicycle related plans, ford -ring continuity and connection to facilities to create a community bikeway network. The City of Temple City will foster conditions where bicycling is accepted and encouraged. Studies have found that people living in communities with built environments that pone, re bicycling :end walking .end to be more social, active and eugaged and are more likely to know their neighbors (completestrects. org), ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For Information roll (916) 654 6410 or TDD (916) 6549880 or write Retards and Fo,ms Mw,agvlenS 1120 N Shee<, M.S-89, Sacramertc, CA 9581- STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 02!2012) 11. Land use, population density, and settlement patterns_ -- Within Temple City's limits are 37,800 residents, bordered very closely with an additional 15,000 residents in unincorporated Los. Angeles County that also consider Temple City home. Temple City's population has increased by 4,513 residents over the past decade and is still growing. The majority of this population (77.6%) is comprised of family households (Census 2010). The City of Temple City is currently focusing on redevelopment projects that revitalize the City, accommodate for future growth and that help bring in major retail developers that will ultimately result in job creation. The City is confident that installing bicycle lanes will have a profound effect on reducing traffic. congestion and improving the quality of life for current and future residents. The City is looking to create projects that will promote healthy living and help meet regional greenhouse gas reduction goals established by SB 375- A more bicycle -friendly City will contribute to resolving several complex issues related to expansion and population growth including traffic congestion, air quality, public health, and livability. 12. Loral - State match ratio As required by Bicycle Transportation Account guidelines the City of Temple City has committed to providing a 10% match of funds to cover the cost of implementing the project It is estimated that the project will cost $533,317, with the City providing match funds in the amount of $53,331. 13, Project readiness The City is eager to complete the improvements identified in the Bicycle Master Plan and will immediately begin implementation of the Citywide Bikeway Improvements Project upon award. The project does not require acquisition of land and will therefore initiate with engineering and design, which is estimated to take approximately 3 months to complete. Upon completion of design, the project will be advertised and placed out for bid from qualified contractors for a duration of approximately 2 months, with award of a construction contract immediately following. ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or Tnt) (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 02/2012) 14. Project type Class II & III (on -road)] Class I (off-road) /other The project will include 4.8 miles of Class II lanes on EI Monte Ave and Las Tunas Drive, 5.2 miles of Class III routes on Golden West Avenue, Adren Drive, Longden Avenue, Lemon Avenue and Oak Avenue and lastly, 2.54 miles of Freer and Olive Street will be designated as bike boulevards, which are similar to Class III bike routes but will receive additional treatment to enhance safety. 15. Prior funding and project implementation The City of Temple City has begun completion of bicycle improvements by initiating the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor Bikeway Improvements Project. This project will construct approximately 3.8 miles of Bikeways within a 1.9 mile project area along the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor and provide a direct bikeway correction between the north and south end City limits. In addition to bike lanes, the project will install support facilities and connections to other modes of transportation. This project will ensure adequate bicycle parking at all major trip attractions, including commercial and activity centers and public transit- Twenty (29) new bicycle parking facilities will be strategically placed along the project area to provide residents safe and convenient access to public transit, schools, shopping centers and other local business in this area. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Agency (Metro) Bicycle Transportation Account Compliance Document (BTA Document, 2006) contains an inventory of existing bikeway facilities, past expenditures, proposed bikeways, and proposed costs for cities within Metro jurisdiction. To date the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor Bikeway Improvements Project has been the lone recipient of funds within the City of Temple City. It is critical that the City obtain funding for the Citywide Bikeway Improvement Project to take advantage of the momentum the Rosemead Boulevard Corridor Bikeway Improvements Project has created. The Cityhas conducted extensive outreach on behalf of both projects and gained the support and interest of residents, officials and cyclist throughout the county. By continuing to implement bikeway improvements the City will utilize this interest, support and momentum to ensure successful completion of the proposed project and a higher rate of utilization. 16. Urban! Rural balance As an urban city located in Los Angeles County, the City of Temple City had to take into account the unique requirements that being an urban city creates for cyclists of all levels in the community. The proposed Citywide Bikeway Improvements Project includes a balance of bikeways intended to accommodate cyclist of all levels and takes into account each of their perceptions of comfort and safety. As previously stated, community 'involvement and participation was vital to the development of the City's Bicycle Master Plan. The plan accounts for information collected from community members via public workshops and online surveys, including typical trip origins and destinations, desired facilities and existing bicycle behavior. The proposed improvements include a wide array of facilities that have been designed to meet the needs of all levels of cyclist and take into account speed, traffic and layout of the facilities. ADA Notice For intlividuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available In alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 orwnte Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 02/2012) 17. Transportation interface with other modes of transportation The project will create a safe bicycle network in the City of Temple City and will benefit bicycle commuters by accommodating motor vehicles and bicycle traffic on residential and arterial streets. Currently, bicyclists must negotiate space with vehicles, pedestrians and street furniture by weaving in and out of the street and sidewalks. The creation of citywide bicycle infrastructure will better accommodate cyclists by delineating the roadway right-of-way between motorized and non -motorized users. The project will provide safe and exclusive bicycle lanes that are delineated, striped and stenciled on the roadway. This will significantly reduce the risk of vehicle/pedestrian and bicycle collisions. The proposed bicycle lanes will offer a range of facility types for beginner and expert bicyclist on regionally significant arterials and low -traffic, low -speed neighborhood bike routes. The project will also increase access to public transportation by providing routes connecthrg to various facilities including sixteen (16) transit stops located throughout the City and the Eaton Wash Bike Path, Rio Hondo Bike Path and ultimately to the El Monte Station. 18. Trip purpose work, school, shop, social I recreational, other The Citywidc Bikeway Improvements Project has been designed to provide access to multiple trip generators throughout the City of Temple City. This design will allow users the ability to utilize bicycling as a safe alternative to automobiles for many different trip purposes including work, school, shopping, social/recreational among many others. This is achieved by connecting existing and proposed facilities throughout the City and the region. For example, construction of the bikeways will generate trips for work purposes by connecting to regional facilities, providing residents with the opportunity to access employment centers located throughout the region such as old town Pasadena, downtown Los Angeles, Baldwin Park, La Puente, West Covina, etc. The project will also generate trips within city limits by connecting to trip attractions such as the Elm Shopping Center on Las Tunas Drive and Rosemead, the Temple City Square Shopping Center and Gateway Plaza on Longden and Rosemead Boulevard and a large commercial sector in Downtown Temple City on Las Tunas Drive. There are also seven (7 childcare centers, two (2) Parks, the Temple City Library and seventeen (17) schools (K-12) that the project will provide access to. 19. Is applicant willing to accept panial funding? (If funds are not available to fully fund the project is applicant willing to reduce scope or increase other funding?) The City of Temple City is willing to accept partial funding and reduce the scope of work should sufficient funds not be available to fully fund the proposed improvements. The City is currently extremely deficient in bicycle related facilities and would benefit greatly by even partial completion of the proposed project. ADA Notica For Individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or Too (916) 654-3080 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, lvl Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 0212012) 30. Does BTA project connect to or become a par( of a larger project or facility with a deals. not mce�n9A)M standards? The Citywide Bikeway Improvements Project proposes connections to facilities located both within the incorporated city limits of the City of Temple City as well as regional facilities, Proposed regional connections include the Eaton Canyon Wash and the Rio Hondo Bike Path. Locally the project will wnrimt with the Rosemead Boulevard Bikeway Project and the El Monte Avenue bike lanes through the City of Arcadia. All of the aforementioned facilities have been designed primarily for bicycle travel, 21. Is faCIRY open 2417711 not what are the hours of Use? And why isn 1 the facllity abuys available? The bicycle lanes for the project will be available to the public 2417. The bicycle ways are shared with motorists and will provide all day access for bicyclists to ride to their destination, The availability of safe and convenient parking is a critical part of the bicycle project. In order to establish bicycling as a true transportation alternative there needs to be facilities that accommodate bicycles at shops, offices, schools, and near public transportation The City will be installing 60 end -of -trip facilities which will be available 2417. The facilities will be safe, accessible, visible and convenient for residents to use. V. APPLICANT SIGNATURE An authorized representative of the applicant agency must sign the application. The undowslgnocIARkta that the statements contained in the application package are true and complete to the best of the applicant's knowledge. _DATE 04/26/2012 Jose E. CityManager Distribution: Local agencysends original and one cnov to the DLAE. 0 DLAE forwards original to BFU ❑ DLAE retains copy for district file. ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formals. For information call (916) 6548410 or TDD (918) 654-3880 or write Records and corms Management. 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814, STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT APPLICATION Exhibit 21-B (REV. 02(2012) BTA NO. DLAE RANK DLAE RATING - HQ RATING WEIGHTED RATING BTA $ (1 ST CRITERIA) 10% RES BTP RTPA (REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY) CWA APPLICATION STATUS ASSEMBLY NAME SENATE NAME AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATION DISTRICT COMMENTS HQ COMMENTS MISSING ITEMS VI, FOR CALTRANS USE ONLY DLAE SCORE HQ SCORE WEIGHTED SCORE REQUESTED BTA $ BTA $ (2ND CRITERIA) BTA RES CEQA (Callfomia Environmental Quality Act) ELIGIBILITY ASSEMBLY DISTRICT SENATE DISTRICT TITLE ADA Notice For Individuals vdth sensory dlsablitles, this document Is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 orwrite Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS -89, Sacramento, CA 95814. Attachment 1 Project Vicinity Map Photographs of the Project Area Project Zoning Map Bicycle Collision Map Existing/Proposed Regional Connectivity d 1'a i p _mt d t d A. :E W 5 @ X e f+ E N.. d N MGOLDEN LY - ~ •� 41 Q 3 3 A 111 Y � � O 'p%p%. N C �• EW Q 2 m E ti � � � lr V v u a m r u d 1'a i p _mt d t d A. :E W 5 @ X e f+ LO M O G w rt O 3 d Z d T m r v N v � a f%i F 0 O Q a o Qj > Q 7 IQ GV3W^SW I• a T O d 0 � + 2 C Q E N.. d N MGOLDEN LY - ~ •� Y � � O 'p%p%. N C �• EW Q 2 m E ti � � 0 V N lr V v a m r u LO M O G w rt O 3 d Z d T m r v N v � a f%i F 0 O Q a o Qj > Q 7 IQ GV3W^SW I• a T O d 0 � + 2 C Q City Wide BlkewatrImprovements Vicinity Map, Bust Stops Activity Centers Legend A. Children's Academy Center B. Kumon Math & Reading Center C. Love & Care Christian Pre -School D. Unique Dental Lab College E. Wonder World Pre -School F. Little Harvard Academy G. Wonder Year Montessori School H, Jefferson Middle School I. Madison Elementary School J. Arcadia Children's Educational K. Bread of Life Church San Gabriel Valley L. Hope International Church M. Immanuel Christian Church N. First united Methodist Church O. Grace Taiwanese Presbyterian/Play Factory Pre -School/ Temple City Christian Church P. Victory in Christ Church Q. Triumphant Church, home of Christians R. Bethlehem Lutheran Church S. First Southern Baptist Church T. Temple Beth David of the San Gabriel Valley I.J. Jefferson Middle School Citvwide Bicvcle Improvements—Phase " Class III—Bicycle Routes Northbound—Arden Dr. At Lower Azusa Rd. vvest of i empie city ttivo. Eastbound—Longden Av, At Encinita Ave. Citvwide Bicvcle Improvements—Phase I Class III—Bicycle Routes At Ardendale Ave. l Eastbound—Lemon Ave. At Encinita Ave. _ 4 Northbound— Oak Ave. At Lemon Ave. Westbound—Lemon Ave. At Golden West Ave. Citvwide Bicvcle Improvements—Phase Class III—Bicycle Routes Northbound— Golden West Ave. South of Garibaldi Ave. Citvwide Bicvcle Improvements—Phase I Class II—Bicycle Lanes Westbound—Las Tunas Dr,. Golden West Ave. Southbound—EI Monte Ave. North of Olive St. Westbound—Las Tunas Dr. Temple City Blvd. Citvwide Bicvcle Imorovements—Phase' Bicycle Boulevard Freer St. - West of Santa Anita Ave. Facing West Freer St. - West of Santa Anita Ave. Facing East Arcadia Wash @ Freer St. Olive St - West of Arden Dr. Facing West Olive St. - West of Arden Di Facing East m li iJ % f o v a. w U ® 10 !L ZCL 0 I. 4 d >'LL o .`L W m 3 v ci 11 I• a J ,,,, �i-�I. t. Iii f %�br ri-_i Y't It l-}� 'i� I'. �_ r I q + l f•; I���gJ Lr � Y - 1 � � y I � Lf(\ S a [i t I •,� T lid 4 I t a -k � —, — 'i- x, -r,,{{11 FF tai � t � fS,i � ::. �t �s"tj 4���4� •`" I I�- pa ..ve �� �� � _000OOO�I—J.�'1!i� s- r ,• a•,'t,` t� �II�;_ �r INA 4.4; I, li l 1 ,1 C h � M N Y C pl a ¢ v 0 CC'Z of J O h L O ` C C y �' m z •�- ,� V � wo- � v - SAMARN6PAVE W J Q f� r_ r YW p s o Y O- EIMONlE. Z Q N w I Z 01 > J < AROEN OR u E C a ¢ CL C m PVE � M N c C. � gpIDWIN O V O v ZW `� .�� GfT`(BVD m o pp U GOLDEN WEST AVE p - -�M,PLE N V d !P • c a � O C. •+ m W,% � a O v8 tli' aE s < spm mz � � i OAK AVE 3M1YN11NION3 � � _ 7 We av3w3soa o U q - s = p Q J U Q.w 3Atl 131tl950W zNTOIW48 K$ m m Q 3AVIOLane Y w Eo w oe V Es< 11 UW 9 N O1 m LL d V m v N C 0 Cc m c m a v m W m 0 0 C 0 tn N N v 3 m {L Attachment Z Cross-section Drawings D o ,D 3 C z D n � w < 3 m m rDX D v � a r m n O LA Ln m n --i 0 z -t m D m Z --I D)I� full L, CL 57 Co v q m -�a n G rGo_ r a r a' .—nt V a -+ fD >> O fD 01 d a N O I n m r o 04 O � Z `D m n w < n m n Z fD C 3 m � m X � D a � � v r m n O Ln m n O Z m D m Y is c r; to rD m � r � < O W ro 0 r < (TD v v s 3 < O rn � 'e � W lD V � v < � � O lD v Oa a V a 111 li cn NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: County of Los Angeles FROM: Community Development en) Registrar -Recorder City of Temple City ,2 12400 E. Imperial Highway 9701 Las Tunas Drive Second Floor, Room 2001 Temple City, CA 91780 0 1 Norwalk, CA 90650 1 Project Title: aBpISSiy�^-(FrJ �'t4lti�;!��`� RC N u Bicvcle Improvements inTemple Citv 2 Project Location -Specific: 1. Its Rosemead Blvd_ and ocher streets/richt-of-ways within Temole Cihr uer llie cilvwide Bicycle Master Plan 3. (a) Project Location - City. Temple Citv (b) Project Location - County: Los Anoeles 4. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project: 5. 6. 7- n 91 Cunslruut Class I. 11. and ill bikeways by reslrir"ina and repavino on exislina 6uht of ways — urovidino connections to residential neighborhoods, schools.emplovment centers, and adiacent local and reolonal bikeways. The city of Temple Citv is or000sino new Bicvcle lanes on Rosemead Boulevard as part of a comprehensive uvorade for safety enhancement and beautification. The bicvcle lanes will be provided within the exislina public right of wav primarily through re-strlpmq of the road and minor chances as needed to medians. curbs, nutters. and sidewalks. A Bfcvcle Master Plan is expected to be adopted by the Citv Council prior to March 31. 2011 to comoly with the state Bicvcle Transportation Account requirements. This notice of exemption shall also apply to anv proposed bicvcle improvements in the Bicvcle Master Plan that will meet the CEQA criteria for bicvcle lanes within exislina public richt of ways. Name of Public Agency approving project: Cilv of Temole City _ Name of Person or Agency carrying out project: Citv of Temple City Exempt status: (Check one) (a)_ Ministerial project. (b) _ Not a project. (e) Emergency Project. (d) ✓ Categorical Exemption. State type and class number: 15304 (h1 Creation of bicvcle lanes on existinq riahts-of-wav (e)_ Declared Emergency. (f) _ Statutory Exemption. State Code section number: (g)_ Other. Explanation: Reason why project was exempt: The proposed oroiect involves the creation of bicvcle lanes on ekistlna riahts-of-way. which is categorically exempt under Section 15304 (h) of CEQA Guidelines_. Contact Person: Steven M. Masura Telephone: (626)285-2171 Date Received for Filing' (Clerk Stamp Here) 11 004.1662 ignaS lure (Lead Agency Representative) Title l �"2`'11 CommunitvDevelorj ISV11 i' ���j" yf CN UNTIL APR 2 2 zon RRGlMTAR-RECORDEft/COUNP( CLIA Attachment 3 Estimate E ( _ ct § - \ | ■ ()) \: k '00 - R - §;w @i; ` \§ ;lu.;! ®2£x- 2=;;\;#!;; ■-®_ � _ ®, , ; [ Attachment 4 Adopted Resolution A�aO�e�t 5 CgQA Attachment 6 Evidence of project in BTP Chapter 4 1 Recommended Network 4.1.2 Class II Bike Lanes Bike lanes provide a signed, striped, and stenciled lane for one-way travel on both sides of a street or highway. Class II bikeways enhance safety by delineating roadway right-of-way between motorized and non -motorized users. The BNO proposes 10.0 miles of bike lanes; five north -south facilities and two cast -west facilities, Table 4-3 summarizes the proposedTemple City Class II bike lane extents and length. Table 4-3 Proposed Class II Bike Lanes Baldwin Ave Lower Azusa Rd EI Monte Ave Lower Azusa Rd Las Tunas Or Baldwin Ave Lower Azusa Rd EI Monte Ave Rosemead Blvd Southern Pacific RR Santa Anita Ave Grand Ave Temple City Blvd Southern Pacific RR Live Oak Ave 0.95 Live Oak Ave 0.92 Muscatel Ave 1.5 Southern Pacific RR 1.5 Callita St 1.9 Live Oak Ave 0.72 El Camino Real Ave 25 TOTAL 10.0 The proposed Rosemead Boulevard Class II hikeway will be a critical part of an overall corridor -long streetscape project, which will include improvements to pedestrian facilities, landscaping, and other amenities. Figure 4-3 is an artist's vision of the final Rosemead Boulevard streetscape. To accommodate new bike lanes, several of the Class II bikeway projects will require changing the existing right-of-way, including narrowing some travel lanes and turn lanes, and removing on -street parking in some locations. Figure 4-4, Figure 4-5 and Figure 4.6 illustrate example treatments from the existing roadway cross-section without bike lanes to new cross-sections with bike lanes. 42 1 Alta Planning + Design City of Temple City I Bicycle Master Plan 4.1.3 Class III Bike Routes Class III bike route facilities use signage and painted markings to inform motorized and non -motorized users that the roadway is a part of the official bicycle network, Bike routes are appropriate where there is insufficient right-of-way to install a dedicated lane or widen the shoulder. All proposed Class III segments should display bicycle route signs consistent with the California MUTCD. The bike route may also use shared -lane markings when the street provides on -street parallel parking. Table 4.4 summarizes the proposed Temple City Class III bike lane extents and length. Table 4-4 Proposed Class III Bike Routes Arden Dr Lower Azusa Rd Freer St Olive St Daines Or Gracewood Or Daines Or Live Oak Ave Daines Or Santa Anita Ave Baldwin Ave Encinita Ave Southern Pacific RR Lemon Ave Garibaldi Ave Burton Ave Baldwin Ave Golden West Ave Lower Azusa Rd Lemon Ave Lemon Ave Encinita Ave City Limit elo Golden West Ave Live Oak Ave Encinita Ave El Monte Ave Longden Ave Burton Ave 100'elo Agnes Ave Oak Ave Lemon Ave Camino Real Ave TOTAL D.47 0.11 D,25 1.2 1.9 1.6 1.9 0,68 1.7 1.5 0.25 11.6 Alta Planning + Design 147 4.1.4 Bike Boulevards Bike boulevards am similar to Class III bike routes in their use of signage and painted markings to designate the roadway as a part of the official bicycle network. However, bike boulevards also receive additional. treatment to emphasize bicycle traffic and discourage cut -through auto traffic. such treatments include auto traffic diverters, speed bumps, and bicycle -specific intersection traffic control. Table 4-5 summarizes the proposed Temple City bike boulevard, which spans the southern portion of the City from east to west. City of Temple City I Bicycle Master Plan Sample Bike Boulevard Pavement Treatment. Morro Street, San Luis Obispo Table 4-5 Proposed Bike Boulevards Arden Dr Freer St Olive St Freer St Arden Dr Santa Anita Ave Olive St Rosemead Blvd Arden Or 0.11 0.84 1.7 TOTAL 2.7 Alta Planning+ Design 149 Attachment 7 Relevant support items 1. Letters of Support 2. Article Clippings 3. Bicycle Master Plan Survey Results 4. March 9, 2011 Meeting Minutes 5. March 97 2011 Meeting PowerPoint O fto 9701 LAS TUNAS DRIVE 0 TEMPLE CITY • CALIFORNIA 91780-2249 • (626)265-2171 Kirk Cessna Chief, Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation District Seven 100 South Main Street, Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Bicycle Transportation Account Program: City Wide Bicycle improvements As the Mayor of Temple City, I would like to extend my support for the 2011 Bicycle Transportation Account Application for city wide bicycle improvements. The project will construct 12.6 miles of bicycle lanes on residential and arterial streets throughout Temple City. The addition of bicycle infrastructure and facilities will help the City of Temple City become a multi -modal City that caters to vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. With the adoption of the Bicycle Master Plan the City will ensure that the needs of -bicycle commuters are accommodated in all phases of transportation planning and roadway construction. The proposed facilities will connect to both existing and proposed bikeway systems in adjacent municipalities and in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. Furthermore, the installation of new bikeways will be a great way of introducing a complete streets concept into the City's existing infrastructure by ensuring that all users have safe access to the roadway. The new bikeways will remove travel barriers for current and potential bicycle commuters. The City has been collaborating with Los Angeles County of Public Works to create a city wide bicycle network that provides regional connectivity to unincorporated parts of Los Angeles and the neighboring City's of Rosemead, Arcadia, EI Monte and San Gabriel. The addition of the bicycle improvements should encourage community members to bicycle to their destinations which should help reduce harmful vehicle emissions and high prices associated with vehicle use. The City is a proud supporter and stakeholder of the City Wide Bicycle Improvement Project. The City has been diligently working with organizers, planners, and the community in developing a strategy that will promote and encourage the community to choose bicycling as a viable form of transportation. We look forward to the proposed improvements and ask for your high consideration as we gladly endorse our Bicycle Transportation Account application. Sincerely, Pe"rnendovizc Mayor March 17, 2011 MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH MAYOR Mr. Kirk Cessna, Chief Office of Local Assistance, District Seven California Department of Transportation 100 South Main Street, Suite 10D Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Mr. Cessna; The County of Los Angeles would like to extend its support for the City of Temple City's 2011 Bicycle Transportation Account Application for the city-wide bicycle improvements along Rosemead Boulevard. The bicycle improvements will help the City of Temple City become a multi -modal city that caters to both vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The bicycle improvements will be a great addition to the Rosemead Boulevard project by incorporating a complete streets concept into the City's existing roadways. The bicycle infrastructure will be designed to reduce the risk of serious injuries and fatalities that result from motor and bicycle collisions. In addition, the project will promote active living and lessen the amount of pollution caused by motor vehicles. The bicycle project will install bicycle features that will promote a safe, sustainable and livable downtown area. The project will also install end -of -trip facilities to integrate public transportation with commercial areas and new bicycle infrastructure. This will help the --City create a bicycle network that achieves high levels of non -motorized travel, which will lead to reduced traffic conditions, improved air quality and be an economic benefit. We look forward to the proposed improvements and ask for your consideration as we gladly endorse the City of Temple City's 2011 Bicycle Transportation Account Application for city-wide bicycle improvements. m retp/, 1 P? J4 MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Mayor MDA:bmd ROOM 869 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION, 50D WEST TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 TELEPHONE (213) 974-5555 • FAX (213) 974-1010 • WEBSITE hgp:11antonovich.co.la.ca.us/ - E-MAIL fifthdistrict@lachos.org Temple City Chamber of Commerce March 8, 2011 Kirk Cessna Chief, Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation District Seven 100 South Main Street, Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Bicycle Transportation Account Program: City Wide Bicycle Improvements am pleased to submit this letter of support for the City of Temple City's 2011 Bicycle Transportation Account Application. The City wide bicycle improvements will install much needed bicycle infrastructure and facilities in the City of Temple City. As the President of the Temple City Chamber of Commerce, I am excited that the City is submitting an application to create a bicycle network in the City. The bikeways proposed under the City's Bicycle Master Plan will provide connectivity to City's most viable resources including transit, schools, libraries, parks and commercial areas. Furthermore, the project will increase the number of people who bike, increase the frequency and distance of bicycle trips, improve safety for bicyclists, and increase public awareness and support for bicycling. The Chamber of Commerce has been identified as a Stakeholder for this project and has been involved In the development of the Bicycle Master Plan process by attending community meetings, making recommendations and raising community participation. The Chamber of Commerce will continue to lend its support to the City by participating in the City's educational programming. We look forward to the proposed improvements and ask foryour consideration as we gladly endorse the City of Temple City's city wide bicycle improvements under the Bicycle Transportation Account Application. Sincerely, Linda Payne President -CEO Temple City Chamber of Commerce 9050 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, California 91780 • (626) 286-3101 y yl� �, Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition A�m 634 S. Spring St, Suite 621 Los Angeles, CA 90014 Phone 213.629.2142 Facsimile 213.629.2259 www.la-bike.org March 17, 2011 ICik Cessna Chief, Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation District Seven 100 South Main Street, Suite t00 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Bicycle Transportation Account program: City Wide Bicycle Improvements Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition is pleased to submit this letter of support for Temple City's 2011 Bicycle Transportation Account Grant application. The city wide bicycle improvements in the City of Temple. City will help residents embrace bicycling as a viable and healthy mode of transportation. We strongly support the City of Temple City's Bicycle Transportation Account Application for the 12.6 miles of city-wide bicycle improvements and ask for your strong consideration when evaluating this application. The bicycle improvements will provide the City with an opportunity to create much needed infrastructure improvements that will support bicycling as a viable form of transportation. With more residents using bicycles, this project should help reduce some of the harmful vehicle emissions and pollutants that would go into the air if motorized vehicles where used. Our organization is identified as a stakeholder in the project and will continue to find ways to engage and participate in community events that educate and encourage residents to bicycle. Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition develops campaigns, programs, resources and events to support bicycling - related advocacy, education and outreach. LACBC envisions a ncNv Los Angeles that is a great place for everyday, year-round cycling, a Los Angeles vuth healthier, more vibrant communities, where the air is cleaner, and streets are safer and quieter. Sincerely, (J? °*eRuor.� Jennifer Klausnet Executive Director Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition County of Los Angeles SherifF�s Department Headquarters ,Aj. „ =«l 4700 Ramona Boulevard w' Monterey Park, California 91754-2169 March 16, 2011 Kirk Cessna Chief, Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation District Seven 100 South Main Street, Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re; Bicycle Transportation Account Program: City Wide Bicycle Improvements Dear Chief Cessna: The Temple Sheriff Station is pleased to submit this letter of support for Temple City's effort to secure funding under the 2011 Bicycle Transportation Account program. Currently, bicyclists must negotiate space with vehicles, pedestrians and street furniture by weaving in and out of the street and sidewalks. Creating a city wide bicycle network will better accommodate cyclists by providing a roadway that is safe and help reduces the risk of vehicle and bicycle collisions. The Los Angeles Sheriffs Department is a stakeholder and proud supporter of the City wide bicycle improvements and the Bicycle Master Plan. The Sheriffs Department has formed a partnership with the City and will strongly support the City's educational campaign by participating in enforcement programs that will educate, promote and enforce bicycle safety in the city of Temple City. The project is very important for our city and its residents as we contin ue to find innovative ways to minimize our impact on the environment and our reliance on motor vehicles. Sincerely, LEROY D. BACA, SHERIFF Jos phF. Fennell Jr.Captain mmander, Temple Station -rad tion 0j&-r,uice cSince 1830 S ANGELES of try COUNTY OF LO1A&. Public Nealth } ' �111pIr�� JONATHAN E. FIELDING, M.D., M.P.H. Dlreal rand Health OWar eDARD OFBDPERYISORe JONATHAN E. FREEDMAN 41ods Main. Chief Deputy Director Fm 01 tAd Mam Miry-Thom" v xubllchealth.lacougty oov $� Dl' o lav Ya,vatavaky San Gabriel Valley Service Planning Area (SPA 3) yh'r'D IVAN Don Rmbe Metropolitan Service Planning Area (SPA 4) Fo.mhDWN M WD.Am4eavfch FIM DIecid CRISTIN MONDY, R.N., M.S.N., M.P.H. Acting Area Health officer SHEREE POITIER, M,D. Area Medical Director SPA 3 S 4 AREA HEALTH OFFICE 241 North nituaroa Street. ROOM# 110, Los Angeles, CaIVOMIa 90012 PHONE (213) 240$049 FAX (213) 202.5090 nroxagu)NltReaM.wsfSvla� �dsx�m_ March 16, 2011 Kirk Cessna Chief, Office of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation, District Seven 100 South Main Street, Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90012 RE: BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROGRAM: CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS Dear Mr. Cessna: It is my pleasure to write in support of Temple City's citywide bicycle improvements and the application for funding through the Caltrans Bicycle Transportation Account Program. Finding ways to keep communities active is a challenge, especially in a time where people are becoming more sedentary and dependent on technology and fast food. The citywide bicycle improvements will help establish bicycling as a healthy mode of transportation in Temple City. A big component of the Temple City's bicycle project will be programming that will educate people about bicyclists' rights, responsibilities and safe bicycle operation; it will connect current and future bicyclists to existing resources; and will encourage residents to bicycle more frequently. I strongly urge you to please consider Temple City's Bicycle Transportation Account Application for this city's bicycle improvements. Sincerely, nd Cristin M!ondy, } N, MSN, MPH SPA 3 & 4 Acting Area Health Officer CM:ma Temple City proposes plan to create bike -friendly community - Pasadena Star -News Temple City proposes plan to create bike - friendly community By Jessica Donnelly, Staff Writer Posted: 03103/2011 01:00:00 AM PST A meeting to discuss making Temple City a more bike -friendly community will be held March 9 by the city's planning and public safety commissions. The city currently does not have any designated bike routes, said Community Development Director Steve Masura. The meeting at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers, 5948 Kauffman Ave., will introduce the proposed bicycle master plan for discussion. The plan will make a motion to add bike routes and signs around schools, parks, downtown areas, and connect paths to neighboring cities and the Rio Hondo River Trail, Bike routes are needed for safety of bicyclist, recreation and transportation, Masura said. The city plans to apply for a state grant to cover initial costs of constructing bike routes. If approved by city council, the project is slated to begin 2012. 1dvertlsement Officials are considering responses in an online survey that was available on the city's website for crafting design plans based on the needs of residents. jessica.donnelly@sgvn.com 626.962-8617 ®IREC TV has more of what you )j, ' W watch! NO DI RECTV. EOUPMENT TOBUY) NOSTARTUP Print Powered By ! fld ll f (,i i n, .I Dynamics' i hftD://www.Dasadenastarnews.comlei 17523350 Page 1 of 2 3/17/2011 Temple City proposes plan to create bike -friendly community - Pasadena Star -News Page 1 of 2 Green Dov+na ' Or1,'l it a i 1 ;a19 Patti s... : Fall 2 Live Traffic: 1341N 1105 710S Balls 210E 21OW 19yd Subsaber Services Home Oabvery e -Edition I CV, This Site C, Web Search purrwo byl'Ari ScAsaa Aleds I Login I Newslelof I RSS Home News Sports Business Opinions LA.COM Features Info � Marketplace Place Ad Jobs Autos Homes Obits Directories Recommend mm mend 241,953 people recommend this ahxe LISTEN TO STORY oowwoso III ►■ NI` • _alit More Polo ❑apepyyy j.' �Print -_En ai A p Fnnt Resize Temple City proposes plan to create bike -friendly community Mostkr..d Noor Emailed Jests Donnelly, Staff watar Posta,: 03/03/201106:00:00 AM PST 1 Cel State Los Angeles students Iryto make voices heard as budget cuts barn really 2 Friends and family recall OLerte man slaln at Rose Bawl 3. Pinter community remembers couple killed by Somali pirates 4 Ef Monte man sentenced m online underage sex sang 5 Pasadone declares Level 4 water emergency during 10 - day plant upgrade 6 LAKERS NOTEBOOK' Utdas looking for 'paybackagainst Charlotte 7 Sullying among children Is topic of panel discussion at Pasadena Church B Bead body found near Rose Bowl 9 City to look Into Madison campaign mailer's use of police aHker 10 Community leaders, residents recall Rodney King beating More News Bullying among children Is topic of panel dlowle an at Pasadena church Pasadena theater group launches benefit recycling drive San Merino Library launching series of free pedormances Pall Diro11 Social Calendar, March 3 Effects still felt ham Rodney King beating Crowded field far Monterey Park City CCuncil election Community leaders, residents meal[ Rodney King heging Democrats cool to targeting state workers' pensions FLller wrimunity remembers couple killed by Somali pirates --' A meeting to discuss making Temple City a more hike -friendly community will be held March 9 by the city's planning and public safety commissions The city currently does not have any designated bike routes, said Community Development Director Steve Nasus. Themeetingat7:30pm in the Council chambers, 5948 Kauffman Ave., will introduce the proposed bicycle master plan for discussion. The plan will make a motion to add bike routes and signs around schools, parks, downtown areas, and connect paths to neighboring cities and the Rio Honda RlverTr il. Bike routes am needed for safety of bicyclist, recreation and transportation, Masura said The city plans to apply for a stale grant to Cover Initial costs of consimsting bike mutes, If approved by city Council, the project is slated to begin 2012. Maisie are considering responses In an online survey that was available on the city's website foretelling design plans based on the needs of residents, iessica.donnellv0soviri 626-962`BB11, ext 2705 Advertisement p; Rewrn m Top • Headers: Let us know whoa you think of Me new ..mend. system WINWllh:lpY O mhtml:file://C:\Users\7oseUppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook... 3/17/2011 6.. Feeaunmy 21- FEBROARe 27. 2011 Brown Addresses SWAG Continued from page 1 S.W.A.G Expenditures 2007 -2010 Amount -Business, Transportation & Housing Agenc}' $5,OBB,037.00 State and Consumer Services Agency $1,154,960.00 -Health and Human Services Agency $778,678.00 -Department of Food & Agriculture $175,530.00 -Labor and Workforce Development Agency $129,012.00 -California Volunteers $77,387.00 -Environmental Protection Agency $48,317.00 -Emergency Management Agency$41,810.00 -Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation $12,201.00 -Department of Veterans Affairs $4,968.00 Total: $7,510,900.110 Temple City Bicycle Survey Inputneeded for city's first bicycle master plan; public meeting setfor March 9 The City of Temple City is asking people to take an online survey to find out more about cur- rent biking activity and the improvements they' d like to see to make the city more bike -friendly. Those filling out the survey at www.templecity. us will be eligible to win a new road bike and gift cards from Temple City Bike Shop. The deadline to complete the survey is pebmary 28. "The city does not have bike paths or lanes," said Temple City cyclist and councilmember Vince Yu. "We need community input to develop a well- connected bikeway net work." The survey is part of the city's effort to develop its first citywide bikeways master plan, which could include a 20 -mile network of designated bikeways and other safety improve- ments to connect cyclists to key destinations like parks, schools, transit hubs and the regional Rio Hondo Bike Trail. Incorporating survey findings, the proposed bi- cycle master plan will be presented for public input and review on March 9 at a joint meeting of the city's planning and public safety commissions. That meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers at 5948 Kauffman Ave. "Aside from provid- ing a framework of incor- porating hikes into Temple City's transportation sys- tem, the proposed plan would also put the city in a better position to get government grants for bi- cycle icycle improvements," said Yu. "We're already work- ing to capture a $120,000 state grant to fond ma -ay planned bicycle improve- ments starting first With Rosemead Blvd." The master plan is scheduled for city council consideration and possible approval by June. For more information, ,all (626) 285-2171. Temple City Bicycle Survey I Temple City Tribune Home Contact 1Y*Tr bun e Tempte Thursday, March 17,2011 REOERS CHOICE ':11' 1 VOTE ONLINE Arts Community Obituaries Entertainmerj Food Featured Print Edition Schools Home & Garden Real Estate Notes Desisn Sense Ask Garden Gal Travel Columns Temple City Bicycle Survey By Temple City Tribune Published: Thursday, February 17th, 2011 Input needed for city's first bicycle master plan; public meeting set for March 9 Pagel of 4 Share D tweeta tweet The City of Temple City is asking people to take an online survey to find out more about current biking activity and the improvements they'd like to see to make the city more bike -friendly. Those filling out the survey at httn://www.temnlecitv.us/ will be eligible to win a new road bike and gift cards from Temple City Bike Shop. The deadline to complete the survey is February 28. "The city does not have bike paths or lanes," said Temple City cyclist and councilmember Vince Yu. "We need community input to develop a well-connected bikeway network." The survey is part of the city's effort to develop its fust citywide bikeways master plan, which could include a 20 -mile network of designated bikeways and other safety improvements to connect cyclists to key destinations like parks, schools, transit hubs and the regional Rio Hondo Bike Trail. mhtml:file_//C:\TJsers\Tose\AnnData\l.ocal\Micrnsnft\Windows\TemnoraryTnternet Files\Content_Otitlnok_. 3!17/7011 Temple City Bicycle Survey I Temple City Tribune Page 2 of Incorporating survey findings, the proposed bicycle master plan will be presented for public input and review on March 9 at a joint meeting of the city's planning and public safety commissions. That meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers at 5948 Kauffman Ave. "Aside from providing a framework of incorporating bikes into Temple City's transportation system, the proposed plan would also put the city in a better position to get government grants for bicycle improvements," said Yu. "We're already working to capture a $120,000 state grant to fund many planned bicycle improvements starting first with Rosemead Blvd." The master plan is scheduled for city council consideration and possible approval by June. For more information, call (626) 285-2171. Posted by Temple Citv Tribune on Feb 17th, 2011 and filed under Community, Latest News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RS 5 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site Leave a Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website ,ubmit Query Subscribe for Weekly Updates Your email: Enter email address... Subscribe �nsubscribe Kiva Micronnance "Loans that Change Lives." Make a Difference and Lend Today! Search www.kiva.org Public Service Ads by Google Submit Query mhtml:file://C:\Users\Jose\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook... 3/17/201' For the March edition of TC Life From: Brian Haworth sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 3:56 PM To: 'linda@templecitychamber.org'; 'Temple City chamber (Info)' Cc: Carl Blum; Vincent Yu; Jose Pulido; Steve Masura; Laura Valdivia subject: For the march edition of TC Life Hi Linda and Jeanne, As requested. Feel free to edit as necessary. - Brian Community input Needed for Temple City's First Ever Bicycle Master Plan Public meeting set for march 9 The City of Temple City is developing its first citywide bicycle master plan and is looking for your input. The draft plan will be presented for community input and review on March 9 at a Joint meeting of the city's planning and public safety commissions. That meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers at 5938 Kauffman Ave. "The city does not have bike paths or lanes," said Temple City cyclist and councilmember Vince Yu. "we need the public's input to develop a well-connected bikeway network." The draft document can be viewed starting march 4 at city hall or from the city website at www.templecity.us. The final plan could ultimately include a 20 -mile network of designated bikeways and other safety improvements to connect cyclists to key destinations like parks, schools, transit hubs and the regional Rio Hondo Bike Trail. "Aside from providing a framework of incorporating bikes into Temple city's transportation system, the proposed plan would also put the city in a better position to get government grants for bicycle improvements," said Yu. "We're already working to capture a $120,000 state grant to fund many planned bicycle improvements starting first with Rosemead Blvd." The master plan is scheduled for city council consideration and possible approval by June. For more information and to provide input, e-mail Steve Masura at smasura@templecity.us or call (626) 285-2171. Brian Haworth City of Temple city (626) 285-2171, ext, 2323 bhaworth@templecity.us Brian Haworth City of Temple City (626) 285-2171, ext. 2323 bhaworth@templecity.us Page 1 NEWSRELEASE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 9701 LAS TUNAS DR. TEMPLE CITY, CA 91780 (626) 285-2171 Temple City Bicycle Survey inputneeded for city's first bicycle master plan; public meeting set/or March 9 Date: February 15, 2011 Contact: Steve Masura, (626) 285-2171, smasura@temolecitv.us The City of Temple City is asking people to take an online survey to find out more about current biking activity and the improvements theyd like to see to make the city more bike -friendly. Those filling out the survey at www.templecitv.us will be eligible to win a new road bike and gift cards from Temple City Bike Shop. The deadline to complete the survey is February 28. "The city does not have bike paths or lanes," said Temple City cyclist and councilmembeLVince Yu.- "We need community input to develop a well-connected bikeway network." The survey is part of the citys effort to develop its first citywide bikeways master plan, which could include a 20 -mile network of designated bikeways and other safety improvements to connect cyclists to key destinations like parks, schools, transit hubs and the regional Rio Hondo Bike Trail. Incorporating survey findings, the proposed bicycle master plan will be presented for public Input and review on March 9 ata }Dint meeting of the city's planning and public safety commissions. That meeting starts at 7:30 p.m, in the council chambers at 5948 Kauffman Ave. "Aside from providing a framework of incorporating bikes into Temple City s transportation system, the proposed plan would also put the city In a better position to get government grants for bicycle improvements," said Yu. "We're already working to capture a $120,000 state grant to fund many planned bicycle improvements starting first with Rosemead Blvd." The master plan is scheduled for city council consideration and possible approval by June For more information, call (626) 285-2171. -end- 1. How often do you bike? Response Response 2. If you do bike, what are your reasons for bicycling? (check all that apply) Response Response Percent Count 5 - 7 days per week ® 14.2% 44 1 - 4 days per week ��„__,_;„ ,;,`",'y 35.9% 111 1 - 3 days per month 22.7% 70 Less than one day per month 18.4% 57 Never Q 8.7% 27 Other (please specify) ® answered question 309 skipped question 0 2. If you do bike, what are your reasons for bicycling? (check all that apply) Response Response 1 of 107 Percent Count To get to work or school 1'-' - j 26.0% 77 For exercise/recreation 1 93.9% 278 To shop, run errands, or eat out 6y 33.1% 98 To visit friends/family dui y ilJ 24.7% 73 To get to/from transit 18.6% 55 Other (please specify) ® 4.7% 14 answered question 296 skipped question 13 1 of 107 3. What is the average distance of your bike trips (one-way)? Under 2 miles I _ .. ( 2-5 miles iw----. - -I 6 - 10 miles 11 - 20 miles More than 20 miles Response Response Percent Count 30.4% 89 35.5% 104 19.1% 56 9.6% 28 5.5% 16 answered question 293 skipped question 16 4. Please rate your interest in using each of the following bicycle facilities on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being very interested and 5 being not interested. 2 of 107 1 Very 5 Not Rating Response 2 3 4 Interested Interested Average Count a. Bike Lanes Click_ for example 77.1% 11.1% 4.6%(14) 2.9% (9) 4-2%(13) 1.46 306 (236) (34) b. Bike Routes Click for example 61.0% 19.3% 11.1% 4.3%(13) 4.3%(13) 1.71 305 (166) (59) (34) c. Unpaved Trails or Dirt Paths 33.0% 12.9% 22.1% 11.2% Click for example (100) (39) (67) (34) 20.8%(63) 2.74 303 d. Bicycle Boulevards (a shared roadway with signage and safety enhancements designed to give 50.5% 23.9% 15.0% priority to cycling traffic) (152) (72) (45) 3.0% (9) 7.6% (23) 1.93 301 Click for example 1 example 2 example 3 e. Roadways with no bicycle 5.4% 18.4% 13.3% 52.7% facilities 10.2% (30) (16) (54) (39) (155) 3.93 294 answered question 307 skipped question 2 2 of 107 5. Please rate your interest in the following bicycle programs on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being very interested and 5 being not Interested. 6. Where do you live? Response Response Percent Count Nearest Intersection: 95.8% 294 ZIP Code: 99.3% 305 answered question 307 skipped question 2 Mn, 610YA 1 Very 5 Not Response Interested 2 3 4 Interested Count a. Riding skills and safety courses 33.9%(103) 20.1%(61) 23.4%(71) 7.9%(24) 14.8%(45) 304 for adults b. Riding skills and safety courses 58.6%(180) 16.9%(52) 12.1%(37) 4.6%(14) 7.8%(24) 307 for children c. Safe Routes to School programs 66.3%(203) 13.1%(40) 9.5% (29) 4.2%(13) 6.9%(21) 306 for children d. Public awareness campaigns 55.4%(169) 23.9%(73) 13.8%(42) 3.0%(g) 3.9%(12) 305 e. Special events 48.0%(144) 25.3%(76) 18.0%(54) 4.0%(12) 4.7%(14) 300 f. Maps and guides 55.4%(169) 23.0% (70) 14.1% (43) 3.6% (11) 3.9%(12) 305 g. Bicycle information websites 53.7%(161) 25.0%(75) 12.3%(37) 3.3%(10) 5.7%(17) 300 h. Commuter incentive programs 52.5%(158) 19.6%(59) 14.6%(44) 4.0% (12) 9.3%(28) 301 I. Information and maps delivered 36.8%(110) 15.1%(45) 20.1% (60) 12.0%(36) 16.1%(48) 299 to my home j. Booths at public events 37.8%(113) 23.1%(69) 21.7%(65) 10.0%(30) 7.4% (22) 299 answered question 307 skipped question 2 6. Where do you live? Response Response Percent Count Nearest Intersection: 95.8% 294 ZIP Code: 99.3% 305 answered question 307 skipped question 2 Mn, 610YA 7. What is your age group? Under 18 j 18-25 26-35 0 36-45 1: 1 46-55 56 and over 0 4 of 107 Response Response Percent Count 12.4% 38 8.1% 25 15.3% 47 30.3% 83 20.2% 62 13.7% 42 answered question 307 skipped question 2 B. On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being very important and 5 being not important, please indicate to what degree the following conditions effect your decision to bicycle. 5 of 107 1 Very 5 Not Response Important 2 3 4 Important Count a. Presence of bike paths, lanes, or 70.3% (215) 14.4%(44) 9.5%(29) 3.6%(11) 2.6%(B) 306 routes b. Condition of bikeway/roadway 67.1% (204) 22.0%(67) 6.3% (19) 2.6%(8) 2.0%(6) 304 (Le. pavement quality, etc.) c. Traffic volumes/speeds 69.9%(214) 18.6%(57) 6.5%(20) 2.3%(7) 3.3%(10) 306 d. Motorists' behaviors 74.8%(228) 17.0%(52) 4.3%(13) 2.6%(8) 2.0% (6) 305 e. Amount of street lighting 48.2%(147) 23.9%(73) 18.4%(56) 4.6%(14) 5.2%(16) 305 f. Access to bike parking and 4T9% (145) 23.4%(71) 19.1%(58) 4.6% (14) 6.6% (20) 303 storage g. Ability to combine bicycle trips 31.6%(96) 16.8%(51) 25.7%(78) 10.9% (33) 15.8% (48) 304 with trolley and/or bus trips h. Travel time 34.1 % (103) 23.8'/.(72) 22.8% (69) 7.0%(21) 12.9% (39) 302 i. Available information/knowledge 46.4%(140) 25.8%(78) 17.2%(52) 6.3%(19) 4.6%(14) 302 of bike routes j. Weather 56.1%(169) 22.9%(69) 12.0%(36) 4.0%(12) 6.0%(18) 301 Other (please specify) 14 answered question 307 skipped question 2 5 of 107 9. Where would you like to see new bicycle facilities (i.e. bike laneslroutes, bike signs, bike parking/storage, etc.)? Response Response Percent Count Street (from, to) _1 86.1% 180 Schooi(name) 52.6% 110 Park (name) Other Public Facility (name) 10. Other comments: 6 of 107 62.2% 130 28.2% 59 answered question 209 skipped question 100 Response Count 91 answered question 91 skipped question 218 11. Optional -If you would like to be notified about public workshops or other important project milestones, please provide your contact information below. If you prefer one method of contact (e.g. email only), please provide only that information. Providing your contact information also enters you into the drawing for a new road bike and gift cards from Temple City Bike Shop. Response Response Percent Count Name: 94.2% 229 Company: ® 20.6% 50 Address: I - - 81.5% 198 Address 2: 3.7% 9 City/Town: 87.2% 212 State: 89.7% 218 ZIP: _ 89.3% 217 Email Address: I 94.7% 230 Phone Number: _ -711111[7— n i 72,0% 175 answered question 243 skipped question 66 2. If you do bike, what are your reasons for bicycling? <i>(check all that Other (please specify) 1 Ride to Santa Anita Race Track to avoid traffic and parking Feb 16, 2011 12:53 AM 2 drop the kids off to /from schools Feb 17, 2011 4:56 AM 3 Its too dangerous to bike in the city in 2011!! Feb 17, 2011 5:50 AM 4 Take the kids to schools Feb 17, 2011 5:51 AM 5 to go to work Feb 18, 2011 5:48 AM 6 Food and drink errands Feb 18, 2011 4:44 PM 7 of 107 SPECIAL JOINT MEETING PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 9, 2011 INITIATION: CALL TO ORDER - Chairman Baudendistel and Chairman O'Leary 2. ROLL CALL _- Commissioners: Nimri, Shen, Stratis, Clift, Baudendis`.el O' Leary, Valenzuela, Chen, Horton, Seibert Also Present: City Attorney Vega, Director of Community Development Masura, Community Development Manager Lambert, Public Safety Officer Arilzumi, and Planning Secretary Venters Absent: Commissioner Chen and Commissioner Seibert Commissioner Morton - Made a motion to excuse Commissioner Chen and Commissioner Seibert for due cause seconded by Vice Chairman Valenzuela and unanimously carried. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA No one carne forth at this time. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR NONE S. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NONE 7. NEW BUSINESS: A. STUDY SESSION: THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS THE PROPOSED CITYWIDE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN. RECOMMENDATION: 1) HEAR STAFF REPORT 2) HEAR PUBLIC INPUT 3) RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FIND THIS PROJECT EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTION 15304(h) 4) RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT I HE CITYWIDE BICYCLE MASTER PIAN, Chairman O'Leary — Asked for a Staff Report. Director of Communitv Develooment Masura — Gave a summary of Citywide Bicycle Master Plan. Stated that approximately 300 people responded to the Bicycle Master Plan online survey. Stated that he would like to thank Temple City Bike Shop for participating in the Bicycle Master Plan by providing valuable input to the City and by contributing towards prizes for a raffle drawing to those who took the online survey. DRAFT PUBLIC SA -CTY COMMISSION AILD PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Vag. 2 March 9. 2011 Sam Corbett. Alta Planninq and Desiqn. 453 S. Spring St. #804, Los Angeles. CA 90013 — Gave a PowerPoint Presentation. Sam Corbett. Alta Plannina and Desiqn. 453 S. Sprinq St. #804. Los Anoeles. CA 90013 - Stated that they are a firm that specializes in non -motorized transportation. Stated that Alta Planning and design is currently working on a Countywide Bicycle Master Plan for Los Angeles County and that approximately 70% of the plans that they create are geared toward bicycle master plans. Stated that the proposed bikeways in the City tie together with neighboring cities as the overall goal is to increase the number cyclists. Stated that there are numerous benefits for bicycle plans such as; improving public health and enhancing quality of life, an alternative functional mode of transportation, exercise, greenhouse gas reduction, traffic congestion relief, access to schools, shopping, parks, and public transportation, enhancement of safety for cyclist and pedestrians, and is a great way for residents to save money by not putting gas in their vehicle. Stated that Alta Planning and Design strives toward bicycle awareness by improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. Stated that the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan proposes a 29 mile network of bikeways including links to parks, schools, shopping districts, employment centers and transit facilities. Stated that the total cost of creating and implementing a Citywide Bicycle Master Plan is broken down into various categories. The cost amount for each category is as follows: Class I — Bike Path is 5.5 million dollars, Class II Bike Lane is 1.1 million dollars, Class III — Bike Route is 290 thousand dollars, and the Bike Boulevard is 80 thousand dollars, for a total amount of 6.9 million dollars. Stated that the City conducted an online survey in February which resulted in approximately 300 respondents. Stated that according to the survey, exercise was the largest reason that people ride, followed by shopping, running errands, and getting to work and to school. Stated that the majority of respondents ride less than 5 miles on a one way trip and that few respondents ride more than 20 miles per day. Stated that in terms of bicycle riding frequency 36% of survey respondents said that they ride one to four days per week, 13% Ode everyday and 19% said that they ride less than one day per month. Stated that the streets that were most requested for bicycle improvements are Temple City Boulevard, Las Tunas Drive and Rosemead Boulevard. Stated that it was found that most respondents of the survey are interested in a Citywide Bicycle Master Plan. Stated that in an effort to accommodate various types of cyclists and to get more people on bicycles different types of facilities are created. Stated that the various facilities are: Shared -Use Paths (Class 1), Bike Lanes (Class II), Signed Shared Roadway (Class III), and Bicycle Boulevards. Stated that although Bicycle Boulevards are not officially recognized by Cal Trans, Bicycle Boulevards provide cyclists with higher priority and streets with lower speeds to accommodate children and family riders. Stated that Bike Lanes on Baldwin Avenue and Lower Azusa Road can be narrowed from 12 feet to 11 or 10 feet to create Bike Lanes on major streets to accommodate more experienced riders. Stated that recommended programs include bicycle enforcement campaigns to make sure that cyclists are using their lights and are knowledgeable on safe riding habits and youth education programs, road campaigns, and recreational activities. Stated that encouragement programs are beneficial to encourage people to ride their bicycles. Stated that encouragement programs include bicycle maps, vehicle free street events, and bicycle valet parking. Stated that once the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan is approved by the regional planning organization the City will be eligible to apply for 7.2 million dollars in funding grants for the next five years. Director of Communitv Development_Masura — Stated that the Commissioners and Staff will now take an intermission period so the public could view the bicycle plans and prepare questions for Alta Planning and Design and the Commissioners. Chairman O'Leary - Asked if anyone from the public would like to speak in favor or against the proposed request. Three people came forth at this time. PUHI.ICSAr[IY COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISS ION MINUTES DRAFT Page3 MI 9 2011 Ravmond Tam. 5745 Oak Ave.. Temple Citv. CA 91780 — Stated that he rides his bicycle on a daily basis, and is in favor of the proposed Citywide Master Bicycle Plan. Stated that Bike Lanes should be included in areas where other Bike Lanes in surrounding cities are located, and should connect to various destination points in the City such as schools, parks, and to the Eaton Wash. Stated that a Citywide Master Bicycle Plan is very important because many people are afraid to let their children ride their bicycle an the street. Stated that he would like to see updated bike racks in the commercial areas throughout the City that are U Lock compatible and perpendicular street grates. Stated that different classes of bikeways is great and would like to see his children learn the joys of riding a bicycle riding with friends and to various places. Temole Citv Resident - Stated he has concerns regarding Shared -Use Paths along the Eaton Wash. Stated that it is very costly to develop a Shared -Use Path along the Eaton Wash and is concerned about the overall maintenance of the bicycle trail, once all of the funding has been exhausted. Stated that a portion of the Eaton Wash is private property and is interested in knowing the legality of private property owner rights. Stated that he would like to know what legal rights Los Angeles County carries in regards to intensifying the purpose of the Eaton Wash because it is not intended as a recreational area. Stated that if a Shared -Use Path were to exist along the Eaton Wash and this path was not maintained, graffiti and crime rates could increase. Stated that he is not in favor of a Shared -Use Path along the Eaton Wash, but is in favor of Bike Lanes along the commercial corridors. Ron McKiernan. Temole Citv Bike Shoo. 9628 Las Tunas Dr.. Temple Citv. CA 91780 - Stated that he is in favor of the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan and likes the proposed Class III Signed Shared Roadway paths. Stated that he rides his bicycle 25 to 30 miles a day. Stated that the Class II Bike Lanes concern him because vehicles travel down the road rapidly, even if cyclists ride single file they at times can be grazed by vehicles traveling down narrow lanes. Stated that it would be beneficial to cyclists if a stop sign or a caution sign could be placed at the intersection of Santa Anita Avenue and Daines Drive to discourage speeding vehicles. Stated that he also concurs with Mr_ Tam regarding updated bicycle racks. Director of Communitv Development Director Masura — Stated that he would tike to briefly respond to the comments made by the public and that Alta Planning and Design could follow up with additional comments. Stated that although the bikeways could not connect to every school, there is a proposed network of bikeways that connect to several activity centers. Stated that updated bicycle racks would be placed throughout the City by grant funding, and as time passes the City could change the street grates to be perpendicular, if needed. Stated that the Eaton Wash is a much later phase in the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan which depends on the direction made by Los Angeles County. Stated that if a Shared -Use Path were developed at the Eaton Wash, maintenance of the area would be addressed as time moves forward. Stated that good judgment would have to be exercised regarding children riding their bicycles on busier streets. Stated that the benefits of a Citywide Bicycle Master Plan include increased quality of life and increased home value. Stated that he is interested to hear what options Alta Planning and Design could present to accommodate cyclists that travel on Santa Anita Avenue and Dairies Drive, and those various options could be approached when the Citywide Traffic Calming Study addresses traffic calming measures in the future. Sam Corbett, Alta Planninci and Design. 453 S. Serino SL #804. Los Anaeles. CA 90013 - Stated that bicycle activity attractors and network connecting bikeways are prioritized as key factors to provide guidance as how the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan will be outlined. Stated that updated bicycle racks and bicycle lockers are included in recommendations, minimal "wheelsucker' grates exist along the streets of Temple City, crime and graffiti could actually be lowered as a result of a well maintained and well lit bikeway at the Eaton Wash. Stated that the PUBLIC SAFEIN COMMISSION AND PIANNM COMMMSIONMINUTES DRAFT � (T Popp Mardi 9, �1 « �+ l! class three bikeways will accommodate the neighborhood bicycle riders for children and families, while the class two bikeways are designated for more experienced cyclists. Chairman O'Leary — Asked if there were any questions or comments from the Public Safety Commissioners and the Planning Commissioners for the Staff. The Commissioners did have questions and comments at this time. Commissioner Horton — Asked Mr. Corbett how his plans are co -integrated with neighboring cities as bike lane networks need to be continuous. Stated that the County of Los Angeles and Metro has a Countywide Bicycle Plan and would like to know how Temple City fits in the bigger picture of bicycle networks and connecting bikeways. Sam Corbett. Alta Planning and Desian. 453 S. Sorina St. #804. Los Anaeles, CA 90013 - Stated that one of the biggest priorities for the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan is to have bikeways that connect to regional facilities. Stated that included in his PowerPoint presentation is a map that indicates how the bikeways in Temple City tie in with other facilities and bikeways. Stated that Alta Planning and Design drafted a Countywide Bicycle Master Plan, so he is knowledgeable of the unincorporated areas throughout Los Angeles County. Director of Communitv Development Masura — Stated that the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan has been sent to surrounding jurisdictions and he will follow up to request comments and coordinate implementation. Vice Chairman Valenzuela - Stated that he would like to address partnership areas with other cities actually saying that work with other cities will be implemented_ Stated that he is concerned about the proposed Class II designation, while he could understand a Bike Lane on Rosemead Boulevard, perhaps Baldwin Avenue should be further reviewed because it is a truck route. Chairman O'Leary — Stated that the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan is wonderful, he enjoys watching people smile when they are bicycle riding. Commissioner Stratis - Stated that he was a previous avid cyclist and at times still rides. Stated that his children now ride bicycles and would like to see the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan implemented. Commisslbner Shen — Stated that she would like to thank the stakeholders of this proposed project. Stated that she concurs with the comments made by a public speaker regarding his concerns of lack of maintenance if a bikeway along the Eaton Wash were developed, and also concurs with Mr. Tam and Mr. McKiernan regarding the positive benefits of the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan. Stated that she is in favor of the class two bikeways. Stated that emphasis should be placed on incorporating class two bikeways in the City. Commissioner Nimri - Stated that he has two concerns about the travel lanes, one concern being that the motorists and cyclists are too close together and that accidents as a result could occur_ Stated that he is also concerned about funding, and thought that documentation other than from CEQA, such as NEPA may be needed if there is Federal Grant Funding. Vice -Chairman Clift - Stated that he concurs with his fellow Commissioners, and concurs with the concerns that have been expressed by the public. Stated that he is concerned about the proposed bikeways at the intersection of Fncinita Avenue and Longden Avenue during peak traffic hours, and that the City's Municipal Code should be addressed regarding bicycles. er d a� ILY YUlL::: S!iA.iY COMM,5SI6N hN6 NLhNIviN7 COMMISSION M,N'Ji[5 Mach % 2011 Chairman Baudendistel — Stated that he concurs with his fellow Commissioners and feels that the Citywiae Bicycle Master Plan is a good start and is needed. Stated that maintenance and especially security along the Class I facility should be addressed and taken into consideration. Stated that there are ways to mitigate the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan to ensure that a Class I facility is safe and secure. Director of Communitv Development Masura — Stated that the City could have an analysis done for NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act) if it is required. Stated that it may be costly to alter the existing street or to change curbs so that the street width can be maintained and also create Bicycle Lanes. Stated that street nanovving and Bike lanes can result in traffic calming. Vice -Chairman Valenzuela - Made a motion to adopt the Resolution, recommending that the City Council adopt the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan and find that this project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to section 15304(h), seconded by Commissioner Horton and unanimously carried. Vire-Chairman CVft - Made a motion to adopt the Resclution, recomrnend:ng that the City Council adopt the Citywide Bicycle Master Plan and find that this project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to section 15304(h), seconded by Commissioner Nimri and unanimously carried. 8. COMMUNICATIONS: NONE 9. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS: NONE 10. COMMISSION ITEMS SEPARATE FROM REGULAR AGENDA A. Public Safety Commissioner Nimri NONE B. Public Safety Commissioner Shen NONE C. Public Safety Commissioner Stratis NONE. D. Public Safety Commission Vice Chairman Clift Stated that he observed today's crosswalk sting operation and many traffic violations were given to motorists who did not yield the appropriate right of way. E. Public Safety Commission Chairman Baudendistel NONE F. Planning Commissioner Chen ABSENT G. Planning Commissioner Horton NONE H. Planning Commissioner Seibert ABSENT L Planning Commission Vice -Chairman Vaienzuela NOME J. Pianning Commission Chairman O'Leary NONE PUNI IC tins I I YCOMMISSION AM) 1'1 ANNING COMMISSION MINU MS MWO19 MiI 11, ADJOURNMENT - ,F PcgaG DEA To the Public Safety Commission meeting to be held on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 in the Council Chambers Room at 7:30 p.m., and the Planning Commission meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 22. 2011 at 7:30 p.m. in Council Chambers, 5936 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City. Next Scheduled Meeting of: City Council:. Parks & Recreation Commission: Public Safety Commission Secretary March 15, 2011 March 16, 2011 March 23, 2011 Public Safety Commission Chairman Planning Commission Chairman �� .�� how �� C) �� �� f�� �� � 02 E � o \ >f 2� kk ��� � L- u � a�� E0 A CL oo $ 7 / aj \ c 0 o u E U3a .on / �� \ U E k L. t �c o- E \ 2��\ } �� .�� how �� C) �� �� f�� �� � 02 E � o \ >f 2� kk ��� � L- u � a�� E0 A CL oo $ 7 / aj \ c 0 o u E U3a .on / �� \ U E k L. t �c o- E \ 2��\ 0 � ru \ \ � a j CL J � `E [ :::E% t ) \ & / ca / t3 U 2 7 , c) , � 4 m � � / r \fa ��>1 A � \\ 2 2 r \ \ JJ $ " S (a > - �Q s\ � R 2. 2 22 \/ S e G t _ uo j) > > -0 �. J �. ) % ] /_ _< \ ��; � V,E_ !� �E 2E T •'1 0 4- L VCCI � _ 3 Q o d^ o L C (D ro L1 U c •i N .Y Q) cQ � _0 V C (NO QL1 u c u U U U L v N L Q E vi V) ro N N QJ L ro 3 ro u N N V So u V L ro c on v "D ro ro V o L (D v ( n LU •� U C C (D ro " o U N Q M -1_ } .1 .0 � C ro an OL CL C _O a--1 Q E C: U L O v - 1 c\iY Qyti 0 O 0 0 � on N Q o c 'a V E o , c � o a a r u E +� r6 3 p O C N a� u v, v O u Da�� 0 c Y uE `^ 0 ul _0 C v '+, °7 E U Y a v� L E-. c E > av _ o E an v a E E o 4� 4 v L C E co rn T-S� �. U� c U 0 O �.� -0 o N v— u tf) O J aL-jW 4J (D v=— I § '2 | t � m E � k 2 � \ ƒ r-4on 2� � � / E 0 u CD _0\ k ~E \\ E / u V- � $ '§ §f2 Now 2�g e o /§-C ■ \ ƒ m § ©3 cis; »\fa/ § § / . Ln00Li- � . . . I § '2 | t � 1 YRWHi i a l I i I 44=" ��V.gg�ppi�Pf I� I -••, -•_- _ - iii I N1111 1 6 MWWA- - fiQI07Q-jdw9jL 44 seun peau 14 Q) Z3 I m Lt k �(a£\a/ 70 L4 13 — *32 / \aj E -/tet £ Ae+§=Ton &2E-aj c§ Ua V kE® X22$/k/kƒkj � t E E E E N n 'O O N N r I _ _ = m Ln kA �0 N rt Y U U U m II t i L C J N , Ln N ro u F M co 0 ra Q M ti Ln Ln r u 1 on O a O 4 E i N � c E 3 i O 0 f V Ocu I N Z) N O 6 Ln N ULn ' - V _N C Q u E >, O V V U O , N V O u_ N O O E I o 4N a � O �O N i14 O on CL in E a i v v � L � L r � N C. N O CL u U O ; v 3 N ' 3 .n c � �j ro Y O ro a on ^ L E V v t E O V CL +N u u on c Et on c 7,T E>. u on u u _Q u 0-0 ^C N N V W E � M L L C _on w'n p Od O O Q u E C: a c > fd u v O � o +� -0 ro >, i u aL--' U cO Z3 N u w m >, L N � Y r � C. N C. w u U J ; v 3 N ' 3 .n c E �j ro c ro a v E V v t E O V a E v u on c on c v E>. u >, m p _Q N on 0-0 OV O i L L L c w'n on m a O um � c cc � � Cl) ƒ } / o o \ �C14 / � � . 4A. k @ Q � 2 Ci) k / £ ' 2 t3 / o m 2 : u u U \ [^ .. ...�. .......... » . } �E .: §u .k >13 �a u Ln _ © < 2 - �2 tA �E §a \: 0 U�� u. JJ 0 / \ LU ® � RR� u a1 U CL (D ' / CL � Co ( §±/ /k LC /mak 0 �. � � C2 L- & � � ) 2 @ $ k f 7 / > ƒ } LL CA 2ƒ /a±- w .Q ti. u° E u1 LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT For BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT PROJECT 7 City of Temple City Agreement No. BTA 12/13 -07 -LA -19 District Local Agency THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate entered into effect as of this 1 st day of July 2012, by and between the political entity identified above, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "LOCAL AGENCY", and the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and together referred to as "PARTIES" or individually as a "PARTY WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, under the provisions of Streets and Highways Code Section 2106 (b) and Sections 890 through 894.2, as implemented by regulations in Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 10, of the California Code of Regulations, Bicycle Transportation Account funds (herein referred to as STATE FUNDS) have been allocated to LOCAL AGENCY for the Bicycle Transportation Account project defined in "EXHIBIT A" attached hereto and hereafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and Whereas, before STATE FUNDS will be made available for PROJECT, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement to establish terms and conditions applicable to the LOCAL AGENCY when receiving STATE FUNDS for a designated PROJECT facility and to the subsequent operation and maintenance of that completed facility. NOW THEREFORE, the PARTIES agree as follows: ARTICLE I - Project Administration 1. This AGREEMENT shall have no force or effect with respect to PROJECT unless and until it has been fully executed by both STATE and LOCAL AGENCY, 2. EXHIBIT A designates the party responsible for implementing PROJECT, type of work, and location of PROJECT. 3. LOCAL .AGENCY agrees to execute and return AGREEMENT within ninety (90) days of receipt. The PARTIES agree that STATE may void ,AGREEMENT if not returned within the ninety (90) day period unless otherwise agreed by STATE in writing. 4. LOCAL AGENCY further agrees, as a condition to the release and payment of STATE FUNDS encumbered for the PROJECT described in EXHIBIT A, to comply with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. 5. STATE FUNDS will not participate in any portion of PROJECT' work performed in advance of the effective date of the executed AGREEMENT. 6. Projects allocated with STATE II NDS from the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) will be administered in accordance with the current Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Guidelines, as adopted or amended, and in accordance with Chapter 21. "Bicycle Transportation Account (OTA)" of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPD) published by STATE. 7. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide or arrange for adequate supervision and inspection of PR.OJF,CT. While consultants may perform supervision and inspection work for PROJECT with a fully qualified and licensed engineer, LOCAL AGENCY shalt provide a full-time employee to be in responsible charge of PROJECT. 8. LOCAL AGENCY shall advertise; award, and administer the PROJECT construction contract or contracts. 9. The cost of maintenance, security, or protection performed by LOCAL AGENCY or contractor forces during any temporary suspension of PROJFCT or at any other time may not be charged to the PROJECT_ I0. LOCAL AGENCY shall design and construct PROJECT in accordance with Chapter 1404, Bikeway Planning and Design of the highway Design Manual that describes minimum statewide design standards for bikeways and roads where bicycle travel is permitted and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices that describes the uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic contra! devices. 11. LOCAL AGENCY shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1994 that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability and all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. 12. The Governor and the legislature of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdictions, have prescribed certain nondiscrimination requirements with respect to contract and other work financed with public funds. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to comply with the roquircmeuts of the FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ADDEN- 7DUM aaachcd hereto as Exhibit B and further agrees that any agreement entered into by LOCAL AGENCY with a third party for performance of work connected with PROJECT shall incorporate Exhibit B (with third party's name replacing LOCAL AGENCY) as parts of such agreement. 13. LOCAL AGENCY shalt include in all subcontracts awarded when applicable, a clause that requires each subcontractor to comply with California Labor Code requirement that all workers employed on public works aspects of any project (as defined in California Labor Code §1720-1815) be paid not less than the general prevailing wage rates predetermined by the Department of Industrial Relations as effective at the date of contract award by the LOCAL AGNECY. ARTICLE H - Rights of Way L No contract for the construction of PROJECT shall be awarded until all necessary rights of way have been secured. Prior to the advertising for construction of PROJECT, LOCAL AGENCY shall certify and, upon request, shall furnish STATE with evidence that all necessary rights of way are available for construction purposes or will be available by the time of award of the construction contract. 2. The furnishing of right of way by LOCAL AGENCY as provided for herein includes, and is limited to, the following: a) Expenditures to purchase all real property required for PROJECT free and clear of liens, conflicting easements, obstructions and encumbrances, after crediting PROJECT with the fair market value of any excess property retained and not disposed of by LOCAL AGENCY. b) The cost of furnishing of right of way as provided for herein includes, in addition to real property required for the PROJECT, title free and clear of obstructions and encumbrances affecting PROJECT and the payment, as required by applicable law, of damages to owners or remainder real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by PROJECT. c) The cost of relocation payments and services provided to owners and occupants pursuant to Government Code Sections 7260-7277 when PROJECT displaces an individual, family, business, farm operation or nonprofit organization. d) The cost of demolition andior the sale of all improvements on the right of way after credit are recorded for sale proceeds used to offset PROJECT costs. e) The cost of unavoidable utility relocation, protection, or removal. f) The cost of all necessary hazardous material and hazardous waste treatment, encapsulation or removal and protective storage for which LOCAL AGENCY accepts responsibility and where the actual generator cannot be identified and recovery made. 3. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to indemnify and hold STATE harmless fi-om any liability that may result in the event the right of way for PROJECT, including, but not limited to, being clear as certified, or if said right of way is found to contain hazardous materials requiring treatment or removal to remediate in accordance with federal and state laws. LOCAL AGENCY shall pay from its own non-matching funds, any costs which arise out of delays to the construction of PROJECT because utility facilities have not been timely removed or relocated, or because rights of way were not available to LOCAL AGENCY for the orderly prosecution of PROJECT work. 4. If PROJECT is not on STATE -owned right of way, PROJECT shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Chapter 1000, Bikeway Planning and Design of the Highway Design Manual that describes minimum statewide design standards for bikeways and roads where bicycle travel is permitted and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices that describes the uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices. 5. If PROJECT involves work within or partially within STATE -owned right of way, that PROJECT shall also be subject to compliance with the policies, procedures and standards of the STATE Project Development Procedures Manual, Highway Design Manual, and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and where appropriate, an executed cooperative agreement between STATE and LOCAL AGENCY that outlines the PROJECT responsibilities and respective obligations of the PARTIES. LOCAL AGENCY and its contractors shall each obtain an encroachment permit through STATE prior to commencing any work within STATE right of way or work which affects STATE facilities. ARTICLE III - Engineering 1. LOCAL AGENCY eligible costs for preliminary engineering work includes all preliminary work directly related to PROJECT up to contract award for construction, including, but not limited to, preliminary surveys and reports, laboratory work, soil investigations, the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), advertising for bids, awarding of a contract and project development contract administration. 2. LOCAL AGENCY eligible costs for construction engineering includes actual inspection and supervision of PROJECT construction work; construction staking; laboratory and field testing; and the preparation and processing of field reports, records, estimates, final reports, and allowable expenses of employees/consultants engaged in such activities. 3. Preliminary and construction engineering costs included in the estimate contained in Exhibit A are eligible project costs. STATE reimbursement to LOCM. AGENCY will be on the basis of the actual cost thereof to LOCAL AGENCY including compensation and expense of personnel working on PROJECT, required materials, and automotive expense provided, however, LOCAL AGENCY shall contribute its general administrative and overhead expense. 4. LOCAL AGENCY employees or its subcontractor engineering consultant shall be responsible for all PROJECT engineering work. 5. LOCAL AGENCY shall not proceed with final design of PROJECT until final environmental approval of PROJECT. Final design entails the design work necessary to complete, the PS&E and other work necessary for a construction contract but not required earlier for environmental clearance of that PROJECT. 4 6. LOCAL AGENCY shall certify compliance or documentation of Categorical Exemption determination with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as defined in Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Enviromnental Quality Act. ARTICLE IV - Maintenance and Management 1. LOCAL AGENCY will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, constructed, rehabilitated, or restored by PROJECT for its intended public use until such time as the parties might amend this AGREEMENT to otherwise provide. With the approval of STATE, LOCAL AGENCY or its successors in interest in the PROJECT property may transfer this obligation and responsibility to maintain and operate PROJECT property for that intended public purpose to another public entity. 2. Upon LOCAL AGENCY acceptance of the completed construction contract, or upon the contractor(s) being relieved of the responsibility for maintaining and protecting PROJECT, LOCAL AGENCY will be responsible for the maintenance, ownership, liability, and expense thereof for PROJECT in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representative of STATE, and if PROJECT falls within the jurisdictional limits of another Agency or Agencies, it is the duty of LOCAL AGENCY to facilitate a separate maintenance agreement(s) between itself and the other jurisdictional Agency or Agencies providing for the operation, maintenance, ownership and liability of PROJECT. Until those agreements are executed, LOCAL AGENCY will be responsible for all PROJECT operations, maintenance, ownership and liability in a manner satisfactory to the authorized representative of the STATE. 3. PROJECT and its facilities shall be maintained by an adequate and well-trained staff of engineers and/or such other professionals and technicians, as PROJECT reasonably requires. Said operations and maintenance staff may be employees of LOCAL AGENCY, another urrit of government, or contractor under agreement with LOCAL AGENCY. All maintenance will be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed PROJECT improvements. ARTICLE V - Fiscal Provisions I. STATE'S financial commitment of STATE FUNDS will occur only upon the execution of this AGREEMENT. 2. STATE shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT if a contract for construction of PROJECT has not been awarded by LOCAL AGENCY within the first fiscal year in which STATE FUNDS are allocated. 3. STATE shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by LOCAL AGENCY within the first fiscal year in which STATE FUNDS are allocated, and as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six (6) months thereafter. 4. LOCAL AGENCY may submit signed invoices in arrears for reimbursement of allowable PROJECT costs on a monthly or quarterly progress basis once the AGREEMENT has been executed by STATE. 5. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to submit a status report within thirty (30) days upon STATE'S request for the report. The PARTIES agree that STATE may void AGREEMENT if the status report is not returned within the thirty (30) day period unless otherwise agreed by STATE in writing. 6. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to complete PROJECT and submit a final invoice by April 1, 2018. STATE shall pay to LOCAL AGENCY the STATE FUNDS share of the actual cost of the PROJECT prior to June 30, 2018, the expiration date of STATE FUNDS included in this PROJECT. 7. Invoices shall be submitted on LOCAL AGENCY letterhead that includes the address of LOCAL AGENCY and shall be formatted in accordance with the current Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Guidelines, as adopted or amended, and in accordance with Chapter 21, "Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA)" of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) published by STATE. 8. Invoices must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for allowable costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by LOCAL A GENCY. All costs charged to this AGREEMENT by LOCAL AGENCY shall be costs allowable under the California Bicycle Transportation Act. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of canceled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs. 9. Payments to LOCAL AGENCY can only be released by STATE as reimbursements of actual allowable PROJECT costs already incurred and paid for by LOCAL AGENCY, 10. State will withhold ten (10) percent of the total of all STATE FUNDS for each progress invoice until LOCAL AGENCY submits the final invoice. 11. The estimated total cost of PROJECT, the amount of STATE FUNDS obligated, the required matching funds, and the ratio of STATE FUNDS to LOCAL AGENCY fiords may not be adjusted to cover PROJECT cost increases. LOCAL AGENCY agrees that any increases in PROJECT cost must be defrayed with LOCAL AGENCY' S own funds. 12. LOCAL AGENCY shall use its own non -STATE FUNDS to finance the local share of eligible costs and all PROJECT expenditures or contract items ruled ineligible for financing with STATE FUNDS. STATE shall make a final detennination of LOCAL AGENCY cost eligibility for STATE FUNDED financing with respect to claimed PROJECT costs. 13. STATE FUNDS encumbered for PROJECT are available for liquidation only for three (3) years from the beginning of the State Fiscal Year in which the funds were appropriated in the State Budget. STATE FUNDS not liquidated within this period will be reverted unless a Cooperative Work Agreement (C WA) is submitted by LOCAL AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance in accordance with Government Code Section 16304. 14. The estimated costs of PROJECT are shown in EXHIBIT A. LOCAL AGENCY may, at its option, award contracts for amounts in excess of said estimates, and final project expenditures may exceed said estimates if sufficient local funds are available to finance the excess. It is understood that the allocation of STATE FUNDS shall not exceed that shown in EXHIBIT A. 15. In the event LOCAL AGENCY'S final costs of PROJECT are less than said estimate by reason of low bid or otherwise, the allocation of STATE FUNDS will be decreased in relationship to the percent funded by STATE as shown in EXHIBIT A. 16. Exhibit C defined as the "Certification of State Funding" template, shall be made a part of, and completed by STATE, prior to execution of this agreement. 17. Upon written demand by STATE, any overpayment to LOCAL AGENCY of amounts invoiced to STATE shall be returned to STATE. ARTICLE VI -Audits, Third Party Contracting, Records Retention and Reports 1. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT work and records when determined to be necessary or appropriate and LOCAL AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with STATE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by paragraph three (3) of Article VI. 2. LOCAL AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred PROTECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The accounting system of LOCAL AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion; and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices sent to or paid by STATE. 3. For the purpose of determining compliance with Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance and costs of LOCAL AGENCY'S contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code Section 3546.7, LOCAL AGENCY, LOCAL AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above -referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire. PROJECT period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment to LOCAL AGENCY. STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a PROJFCT for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions and LOCAL AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested. 4. Any subcontract entered into by LOCAL AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain all of the provisions of Article V, DISCAL PROVISIONS, and this ARTICLE VI, AUDITS, THIRD -PARTY CONTRACTING, RI, -CORDS RE'ITSNTION AND REPORTS and shall mandate that travel and per diem reimbursements and third -party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as PROJECT costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors. 5. To be eligible for local match credit, LOCAL AGENCY must ensure that local match finds used for a PROJECT meet the fiscal provisions requirements outlined in ARTICLE V in the same mariner that is required of all other PROJECT expenditures. 6. In addition to the above, the pre -award requirements o€third-patty contractor/consultants with LOCAL AGENCY should be consistent with LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES. ARTICLE VTI - Miscellaneous Provisions 1, LOCAL AGENCY agrees to use all PROJECT Rinds reimbursed hereunder only for Bicycle Transportation Account purposes that are in conformance with Streets and Highways Code Sections 890 through 894.2 and other applicable California laws. 2. LOCAL AGENCY shall conform to all applicable state and federal statutes and Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LPGL) and Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) as published by STATE and incorporated herein, hrcluding all subsequent approved revisions thereto applicable to PROJECT. 3. This AGREEMENT is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by the State Legislature that may affect the provisions, terms. or funding of this AGREEMENT in any manner, 4. Minor changes may be nlade in the PROJECT as described in Exhibit A upon notice to STATI3. No major ch.nige, however, maybe made to said PROJECT except pursuant to an amendment to this agreement duly executed by STATE and LOCAL, AGENCY. 5. LOCAL AGENCY and the officers and employees of LOCAL AGENCY, when engaged in the performance of this AGREEMENT, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents of STATE. 6. LOCAL AGENCY certifies that neither LOCAL AGENCY nor its principals are suspended or debarred at the time of the execution of this AGREEMENT, and LOCAL AGENCY agrees that it will notify STATE immediately in the event a suspension or a debarment occurs after the execution of this AGREEMENT. 7. LOCAL AGENCY warrants, by execution of this AGREEMENT, that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by LOCAL AGENCY for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE has the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability, pay only for the value of the PROJECT work actually performed, or in STATE'S discretion, to deduct from the price of PROJECT, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 8. In accordance with Public Contract Code, section 10296, LOCAL AGENCY hereby certifies under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unacceptable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against LOCAL AGENCY within the immediate preceding two (2) year period because of LOCAL AGENCY'S failure to comply with an order of a federal court that orders LOCAL AGENCY to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. 9. LOCAL AGENCY shall disclose any financial, business or other relationship with STATE that may have an impact upon the outcome of this AGREEMENT. LOCAL AGENCY shall also list current contractors who may have a financial interest in the outcome of PROJECT undertaken pursuant to this AGREEMENT. 10. LO CAL AGENCY hereby certifies that it does not now have nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of PROJECT initiated under this AGREEMENT. 11. LOCAL AGENCY warrants that this AGREEMENT was not obtained or secured through rebates, kickbacks, or other unlawful consideration either promised or paid to any STATE employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, STATE shall have the right, in its sole discretion; to terminate this AGREEMENT without liability; to pay only for PROJECT work actually performed; or to deduct from PROJECT price or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback, or other unlawful consideration. 12. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the STATE'S Contract Officer, who may consider any written or verbal evidence submitted by LOCAL AGENCY. The decision of the Contract Officer, issued in writing, shall be conclusive and binding on the PARTIES on all questions of fact considered and determined by the Contract Officer. 13. Neither the pending of a dispute nor its consideration by Contract Officer will excuse the LOCAL AGENCY from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. 14, Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY tinder, or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction of LOCAL AGENCY arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that LOCAL. AGENCY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all of its officers and employees from all claims and suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought lbrth under, including but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY under this AGREEMENT, 15. Neither LOCAL AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, under, or in connection with any work; authority or jurisdiction of STATE arising under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the LOCAL AGENCY and all of its officers and employees from all claims and suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth tinder, including but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under this AGREEMENT. 16, In the event of (a) LOCAL AGENCY failing to timely proceed with effective PROJECT work in accordance with this AGREEMENT; (b) failing to maintain any applicable bonding requirements; and (c) otherwise materially violating the terms anis conditions of this AGREEMENT, STATE reserves the right to terminate funding for PROJECT upon thirty (30) days written notice to LOCAL, AGENCY. 17. No termination notice shall become effective if within thirty (30) days after receipt of a Notice of Termination, LOCAL. AGENCY either cures the default involved, or if the default is not reasonably susceptible of cure within said thirty (30) day period the LOCAL AGENCY proceeds thereafter to complete that cure in a manner and timeline acceptable to SPATE. 18. Any such termination shall be accomplished by delivery to LOCAL, AGI NCY of, a Notice of Termination, which notice shall become effective not less than thirty (30) days after receipt; specifying the reason for the termination; the extent to which funding of work under this AGREEMENT is terminated, and the date upon which such termination becomes effective if beyond thirty (30) days after receipt. During the period before the effective termination date, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE, shall meet to attempt to resolve any dispute. IL STATE terminates funding for PROJECT with 10 LOCAL AGENCY for the reasons stated in paragraph sixteen (16) of ARTICLE VI, STATE shall pay LOCAL AGENCY the sum due LOCAL AGENCY under this AGREEMENT prior to termination, provided; howevcr, LOCAL AGENCY is not in default of the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT and that the cost of any PROJECT completion to STATE shall first be deducted from any sum due LOCAL AGENCY. 19. The "PROJECT" shall be constructed as provided in this AGREEMENT and in accordance with those laws applicable to LOCAL AGENCY. In the case of inconsistency or conflicts, the terms of this agreement shall prevail. 20. Without the written consent of STATE, this AGREEMENT is not assignable by LOCAL AGENCY either in whole or in part. 21. No alteration or variation of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the PARTIES, and no oral understanding or.agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this AGREEMENT by their duly authorized officers. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY Department of Transportation City of Temple City J _ By Gt, A a" �zc �� � BY /�� �. DEBORAH LYNCH, BTA Coordinator Name: "Tose Polido Bicycle Facilities Unit Division of Local Assistance Title: city Manager Date: / 7%, j /rte 12,/ Date: Nnvomhar 1 s _ gni? s - II EXHIBIT A r . PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND Y;OSTS Local Agency: Agreement No. City of Temple City BTA 1213 -07 -LA -19 Project Location: 4.8 Guiles of Class II lanes on El Monte Ave, Las'runas Drive, 5.21 miles of Class III routes on Golden West Avenue, Ardren Drive, Longden Avenue, Lemon Avenue and Oak Avenue, 2.54 miles of Freer and Olive Street Type of Work: Construction of 12.,6 miles of Class Il, Cass III and bicycle boulevard Length: 12.6 miles Total Cost Percent Funding Preliminary Construction RightofWay Source Engineering lingineering Aauisition BTA $46,432. $30,955 $0 Local $5,159 $3,4391 $0 Other $0 $0 $0 Total $51,591 $34,394 $0 12 Construction Total Cost Percent Contract $402,000 479,987 90% $44,733 $53,331 lo% $0 $447,333 $533,3I8 100% EXHIBIT II FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT ADDENDUM 1. In the performance of this AGREEMENT, LOCAL AGENCY will not discriminate against any employee for employment because of race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, ancestry, national origin, pregnancy leave, or disability leave. LOCAL AGENCY will take affirmative action to ensure that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, sex, sexual orientation, color, religion, ancestry, or national origin, physical disability, medical or disability leave. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. LOCAL AGENCY shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees for employment, notices to be provided STATE setting forth the provisions of this Fair Employment section. 2. LOCAL AGENCY, its contractor(s) and all subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code § 1290-0 et seq.), and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Reg$. Title 2, §7285.0, et scq.) The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission Implementing Government Code, section 12900(a -f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this AGREEMENT by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Each of the LOCAL AGENCY'S contractors and all subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreements, as appropriate. 3. LOCAL AGENCY shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all contracts and subcontracts to perform work under this AGREEMENT. 4. The Contractor will permit access to the records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data and records by STATE, the State Fair Employment and Housing Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by STATE, for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment section of this AGREEMENT. Remedies for Willful Violations: (a) STATE may determine a willful violation of the Fair Employment provision to have occurred upon receipt of a final judgment to that effect from a court in an action to which LOCAL AGENCY was a party, or upon receipt of a written notice from the Fair Employment and Housing Commission that it has investigated and determined that LOCAL AGENCY has violated the Fair Employment Practices Act and has issued an order under Labor Code, section 13 EXHIBIT C CERTIFICATION OF S'L'ATE FUNDING 13TA 12/13-07-1,A-1 9, City of Temple City 1 hereby certify upon my own knowledge that budgeted funds sine available for this encumbrance. j Accounting Officer Date Fumling j - - - f f Fuml Chapter ) Statues � Mein Fiscal Year PEC". PECT i Tss:. ` Code � BTA Funds ` 21/29 2412 ^660-101-W45 2012-2013 2030010 660 2200 j 0045 I S47'),987.60 Attachment 2: City Standard Contract CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT [With alternative highlighted sections if Agreement includes any work for ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING, and/or CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT services] By and Between THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation and [insert name of consultant herel AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA AND (name of consultant) This Agreement for Consultant Services ("Agreement") is entered into as of this day of , 2010 by and between the City of TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation C'City") and , a ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a [here refer to process used, i.e.: request for qualifications / request for proposals / invitation for bids / or other], the performance of the [here specify type of professional service IF one of the following: architectural /landscape architectural / engineering / environmental / land surveying / construction project management] services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a [here refer to type of submittal, i.e.: proposal / quote / bid, etc,J for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Consultant was selected by the City on the basis of Consultant's demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. D. Pursuant to the City of Temple City's Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Consultant Services Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this Agreement. E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT. Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Tenmination of Agreement' of this Agreement, the scope of services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit "A." Should the scope of services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the (consultant shall be deemed to he in Default of this Agreement pursuant to Section 21 of this Agreement. I he City'. in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead atlov Consultant to continue performing the scope of services until such services are complete. SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" which is incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to or outside of those set forth in this Agreement or listed in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in visiting by the City Council or City Manager of City. Consultant shall be compensated for any such additional services in the amounts and in the manner agreed to by the City Council or City Manager. SL CT10N4. COMPENSATION AND MLTHOD OF PAYMENT. (a) Subject to any limitations set fortes in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit `13- "Compensation" and made a pail of this Agreement. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed dollars ($ ), unless additional compensation is approved in writing by the City Council or City tPylanager. (b) Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice ibr all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-consultant contracts. Sub-consultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials. equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit "B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category= in each invoice; shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. (c) Fxcept as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, Citv will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Ceznsultant's correct anti undisputed invoice. td) Payment to Consultant for work perl`onned pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. SECTION 5, INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE. City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant's work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Consultant's work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written e\planation, otherwise Consultant's work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City's acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of airy of Consultant's work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, sections l6 and t7, pertaining to indemnification and insurance, respectively. SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys. reports, data, notes, computer files. tiles and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Consultant. Upon completion, expiration or termination ofthis Agreement, Consultant shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files. files and other documents. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys. reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warrants related to Standard of Performance and found in Section 9 of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings,, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 7. CONSULTANT'S BOOKS AND RECORDS. (a) Consultant shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Consultant's performance of services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed ,o as to permit an accurate evaluation of the .ervices provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three years firom the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by lavvs relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. (b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. (c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Consultant's business, City stay, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the. City and that such documents and records be maintained by the requesting party. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors-in-interest and authorized representatives. SECTION 8. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. (a) Consultant is and shall at all time,.,, remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or Iiability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred tinder this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City. nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees; or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Nefther Consultant, nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. SECTION 9. STANDARDOF PERFORMANCE. Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein, In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards ol'performance set Forth this Section 9, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria are set forth in the Scope of Work that shall also be applicable to Consultants work under this Contract. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs. drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data. notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing am services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant"s guarantees and warranties related to Standard of Performance shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys_ reports; data, notes; computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES. COnSnitaut shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances. regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall obtain any and all licenses, permits zaid authorizations necessary to perform the services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section. SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS It is the understanding of City- and Consultant that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration; demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, "construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying wort:. /Note: Consult City Atformt p if hutended scope of work DUES hichute mij, of the foregoing.] SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement. SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City to]- the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, togedter with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City. SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, (a) Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultants performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Nlanager. Consultant, agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as ofthe date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and aclmowledges that Consultant will, perform non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the scope of work tinder this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of intcrest for puttioses of this section. SECTION 15, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Nlana;;er, except as may be required by law. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations. letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) if Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this :'agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity front Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys ices, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant , its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition. request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party, regarding this Agreement and the vvork performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However. this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Indemnification for Professional Liabilitv. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub -consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the perforriance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or sub -contractors of Consultant. (c) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -consultant / sub -contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terns of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth here is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. (d) City's Sole Neelieence. The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. [Note: Use alternate Section 16 below if Agreement includes any work for ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING, and/or CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT serviees] SECTION 16 INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Indemnification for Design Activities As provided under Civil Code Section 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("hndemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims. actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders, judgments, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, (collectively "Claims") to the extent same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub - consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement, with the understanding that in the event Claims are found by the trier of fact to have been caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the City and its contractors and consultants, and Consultant, damages and expenses from both indemnity and duty to defend obligations shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence. (b) Indemnification for General Services. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's Services other than design services set forth in Civil Code Section 2782.2, Consultant shall to the fullest extent permitted by law indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub -consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (c) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability,Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including reasonable attorneys fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or sub -contractors of Consultant. (d) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -consultant / sub -contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indennnitees. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. (e) City's Sole Negligence. The provisions of this Section 16 do not apply to Claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. SECTION 17. INSURANCE. Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "C" "Insurance," which is incorporated herein by this reference. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Consultant agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request. SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT. The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant's duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Council. Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this Agreement. City acknowledges, however, that Consultant, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors. SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required tinder this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. (a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Consultant. hi the event such notice is given, Consultant shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City. (c) If either Consultant or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Consultant, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Consultant or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Consultant's possession shall be returned to City. Consultant shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Consultant. prepared as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. SECTION 21, DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terns of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work parformcd after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timefrztme in which Consultatrt uiay cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though act reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. ht the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS. Consultant shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy; acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. 'The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes. SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement. SECTION 24. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested. addressed as follows: To City: City of' Temple City Attn: City 'Manager 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 To Consultant: Notice shall be deemed effective on tale date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postai Service. SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represents and warrants that he,`shelthey hasihave the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION. Phis Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative, following approval of this Agreement by the City Council. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make minor amendments to this Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not materially change the Agreement or make a commitment of additional fiords of the City. All other changes, modifications, and amendments shall require the prior approval of the City Council. SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT. 'this Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. SECTION 28. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. SECTION 29. WAIVER. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE. This Agreement shall be interpreted. construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state Vial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles. California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court. venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California. in Los Angeles. SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES. In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision, of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation or, other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other, relief to Nvhich it may be cntitled. SECTION 32, ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other Agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Consultant and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other Agreements, whether oral or written, made by any party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid and binding unless in writing duly executed by the parties or their authorized representatives. SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first -above written. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Jose Pulido, City -Manager ATTEST: Mary Flandricl City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM By: LIM Eric S. Vail City Attomey Its: By: Its: NOTE: CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY 13E REQUIRED BY 'rHE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPER'S BUSINESS ENTITY. CALIFORNIA :ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT S'IATP; OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Oil _ _ _ _ before me. . personally appeared . proved to me on tine basis of satisi dory evidence to be the person(+) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and aclomwledged to me that he/she/they executed She same in his/her/their authorized capacity(iesl, and that by his,her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of Which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PI'NALFY OF PERJURY under ilia lawof the S:ate of California !hat .he foregoing p,aagmph s true and correct. WITNESS my hand and oft -Mal seal. Signature: OPTIONAL, Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment ofthic form CAPACITY CL -TIED BY SIGNER [J INDIVIDUAL [J CORPORATF.OFFICFR FITLF(S) [ ] PARTNFR(S) ❑ LIMITED [1 GENERAL [� ATTORNEY-IN-FACT' i] TRUSTRE(S) [.] GUARDIANI XONSERVATOR (� OI I lFR SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NANIP. OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITYIIFS)) DESCRIPTION OFATTACHED ED DOCL"tIENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMMM' NI iNIBER OF PAGES DA FE OF DOCUNIEN'I SIlINER(S) o rHFR THANNANIE (ABOVE C,WFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE. ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNT Y OF On_ _ __ __before me, . personally appeared ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to he the person(s) v:hose names(s) Wore subscribed to the within instrument and aclsowledged '.o me that he/she/?hey executed the same in his/her/thcir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their sianatu:-e(st on the instrumcnt fie person(s). or thz entity aeon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Wl'INESS my hand and official seal. iSRoAfURI:OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could proN ent fraudulent reattachment of this frmm CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLI:(S) E] PARTNER(s) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL [j ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [I TRtISTEU(S) ❑ GUARDIAN,CONSIRVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NiMNIF OF PERSON(S) OR ENT 'I'TYO S)) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCLIIIIENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF MOTS DATE OF DOCUMENT S16',�ER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE. EXIIIIIIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following Services: A. B. C. D. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. B. C. D. III. During performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. K C. D. IV. The tangible work products and status reports will be delivered to the City pursuant to the following schedule: A. 13. C. 1). V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. B. C. D. V1. Consultant will utilize the following subcontractors to accomplish the Services: A. B. C. D. VII. ANIENDME_N'T the Scope ol'Services, including services, work products, and personnel, are subject to change by mutual Agreement, In the absence of mutual Agreement regarding the need to change any aspects of performance, Consultant shall comply with lire Scope of Services as indicated above. EXH113IT "B" COMPENSATION 1. Consultant shall use the following rates of pay in the performance of the Services: A. I iobl lhonriv rate) B. I iobl [hourly rate] C. liobl rhourly ratel D. HAI Ihourly rate I E. I iobl (hourly rate l I1. Consultant may utilize subcontractors as indicated in this Agreement. The hourly rate for an}, subcontractor is not to exceed S_per hour without written authorization from the City Manager or his designee. I11. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number ol'hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all supplies properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all travel properly charged to the Services. D. Line items for all equipment properly charged to the Services. E. Line items for all materials properly, charged to the Services. P. bine items for all subcontractor labor, supplies; equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $ , as provided in Section 4 of this Agreement. EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE A. insurance Reauircments. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City Manager or City Counsel, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than ANIL Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: Minimum Scone of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services office form Conrruercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code I "any auto" and endorsement (.,A 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. (3) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California and Employer's Liability insurance and covering all persons providing services on behalf of the Consultant and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (4) professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a "claims made' basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services perfumed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 3 consecutive years f0lowing the completion of Consultant's services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 3 -year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. 2. Minimum Limits of Tnsurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of applicable insurance no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 for each occurrence of' bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, and $2,000.000 annual aggregate. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injur} and property dunnage. (3) A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth in Subsections (1) and (2) above. (4) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Worker Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of not less than $1.000,000 per accident. (5) Professional Liability: $1,000.000 per occurrence. 13. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions: 1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either party to this agreement. reduced in coverage or in Ihniis except after 30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested_ has been given to City. 2. General Liabilitv anal Automobile Liabilitv Coverages. (1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employces and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Consultant performs; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant ; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. I fie coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees. (2) Consultant's insurance coverage shall he primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and Volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officer;;, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of; and not contribute with, Consultant's insurance. (3) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (l) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers. officials, employees or volunteers. 3. Workers' Compensation and Emnlover's Liabilitv ('overate. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Consultant. C. Other Requirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract. certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete. certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. I. Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides. 2. Arty deductibles or self-insured retentions roust be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, clann administration, defense expenses and claims. 3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. ATTACHMENT B June 17, 2013 CLARIFICATIONS TO QUESTIONS FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E FOR BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT 07-LA-O-TMPC; BTA 1213 -07 -LA -18 IN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY In response to questions received, the following clarifications have been issued: Question 1: Does this RFP fall under City's on-call service contracts, or is this a standalone proposal? Answer 1: This is a standalone proposal, which any qualified consultant can propose on. Question 2: Is Transtech Engineers eligible to propose on the design? Answer 2: No. Transtech Engineers is managing the Project, and will not propose on the design. Question 3: Can we get a copy of Plan Holders? Answer 3: There is no Plan Holders List. This request is not for Notice Inviting Bids for Construction. This request is for Engineering Services Proposals for preparation of plans. There are no — plans preparedyet. The plans will be prepared by the selected consultant. Question 4: Will the City be able to provide any existing survey, if so is it digital? What are the limits? Answer 4: No. The City will not provide any survey. The selected consultant is responsible to do field work, reviews and surveys as necessary to prepare a set of construction plans. All other terms and conditions in the RFP shall remain unchanged Reminder: 3 Copies of Proposals are to be submitted by lune 28, 2013, 4:00 pm to: Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 For questions regarding this project, please contact via e-mail only: Selim Bouhamidi, Project Coordinator selim.bouhamidilatranstech.ore CLARIFICATIONS TO QUESTIONS -FOR RFP FOR PREPARATION OF PS&E, BTA PROJECT, TEMPLE CITY Page 1 )SAL FOR THE PREPARATION OF R BTA, BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION r, (STATE FUNDED) PROJECT IN THE QTY OF TEMPLE CITY �a l JE FARAH INC. (EFI) Califnrnia Certlf?eE'$Inall Business Enterprise Etp11I44 A3 40 RCT: 42080, TR 1926, LS 8258, QSD/QSP 21962, REB1095310 AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, AND LAND SURVEYING 1593 Liberty Dr, Corona, CA 92881 Tel. (951)-898-0772, Fax (951)-278-4110 email: efarah@eliefarahiiic.com Website: Eliefarahulccom California Certified Small Business 41443340 1593 Liberty Drive, Corona, CA. 92881 Tel. (951)-898-0772, Fax (951)-278-4110 June 25. 2013 email: ---_ Web: Mr. Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 Via mail Subject: Proposal for the preparation ofPS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City Dear Mr. Perisco: Per your request, Elie Farah, Inc. (EFI) is pleased to submit this Proposal the preparation of PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded)Project in the City of Temple City. Please consider the following: =k EFI is a California Certified Small Business Firm (#1443340). This provide us with extreme flexibility. We are able to control cost and meet aggressive schedules. ak The principal is the project manager and the single point of contact. Elie Farah will be the Project Manager/Traffic Engineer/and Civil Engineer. I am personally involved in all aspects of the designireview and management of each project ensuring seamless results. Most projects are designed/reviewed by me. Larger firms tend to assign junior engineers with little oversight. ak I am registered as a Civil Engineer and a Traffic Engineer with over twenty five (28) years of experience. This provides me with a perspective not shared by many. I am able to analyze projects from various aspects and recognize and avoid potential conflicts and costly construction problems before they occur. vh EFI has recently designed Bike lanes in the City of Rosemead and is part of the team for the Las Tunas beautification project which includes Bike facilities. While at Transtech, I designed Bike path in Oceanside and a preliminary alignment for 42 miles Bike Trail extending from Oceanside to the City of San Diego. 4F As a former Consulting City Engineer for various Cities, plan checker, a construction manager/resident engineer, and a design engineer with a diversified background, I am familiar with the many design requirements. I strive to provide a PS&E package that is clear, concise, and complete. I insure that 1of15 final plans are once anain checked in the field with the designer prior to finalization, ltns minimizes change orders and claims during the construction phase EFI has delivered manv aroieets as promised on time and on budeet. Please feel free to check our references. EFI will not bid or accept a job unless we have the qualifications and can meet the timeline. 4. EFI has successfully completed many projects on time and on budget. Our list of client Cities includes the City of Torrance, City of Irwindale, City of Alhambra, City of Rosemead, City of Commerce, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Temple City, City of Upland, City of Villa Park, Orange County Public Works, City of Lake Elsinore City of South Pasadena, and City of El Monte. We look forward to having the opportunity to discuss our qualifications and approach in a greater detail. Should you have any questions or need additional information, Please call me at (951) 898-0772. Sincerely, E'He Farah, Inc. 4_ _ TABLE OF CONTENTS Subiect Paqe No. Section 7 Scopeof Work..................................................................... 04 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Project Staff Qualifications..................................................... 05 References................................................................................. 12 Company Qualifications............................................................. 12 CostProposal..................................................................... 13 Schedule.................................................................................. 14 3 of 15 EFI will complete projects in an efficient and cost effective manner. In performing services, EFI will follow the following parameters: ✓ The scope of work for the project includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1 of the RFP. ✓ Provide all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. ✓ Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. ✓ Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create a base map of existing conditions. ✓ Prepare plans and details. ✓ Prepare specifications. ✓ Prepare cost estimates. ✓ Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. ✓ Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. ✓ Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. ✓ Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: o First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. o City will take 2 weeks for the review. o Final submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review comments. ✓ Provide bi-weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. ✓ Attend 3 project meetings. ✓ Final Product: PS&E Bid Package ready for bidding, including 1 wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, MsWord file of Specifications, Excel file or Estimates, pdf file of all othe documents. EFI continues monitoring the schedule and the progress of the design. Additional resources will be employed in case of a slip in the project schedule. EFI will complete the design on time & on budget 4of15 EFI Proiect Manauer Elie Farah, PE, TE ................... EDUCATION ....Civil Engineer/Traffic Engineer QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 1985 University of New Orleans,. New Orleans, Louisiana BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 1983 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ASSOCIATES OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1981 Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana REGISTRATION REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, CA 4C42080 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, CA #LS8258 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CA TR 91926 QSD/QSP 921962 Mr. Farah is a registered Professional Civil Engineer, and Traffic Engineer with a diversified background and more than 28 years of diverse experience. The following is a partial summary; For the City of Rosemead; SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS 5 of 15 Prepared traffic modification Dlans for Rosemead and Vallev & Rosemead and Mission as well as striping plans to incorporate adding bike lanes. Provides City Engineering services and is Dresently the contract City Engineer for the City of Rosemead. Mission Drive improvement, provided the survey and design for Mission drive to include street and striping plans. Provided Stop Sign Warrant Analysis for Loftus and Bartlett and Angelus & Keim. Provided Traffic Calming measures for Rosemead PI and Earlswood Dr. Provides plan checking assistance for a variety of private development related plans. For the Temole City- EFI is the Civil/Traffic consultant for the Las Tunas Beautification Project. Bicycle lane are an integral part the design San Diego County. While at Transtech, prepared feasibility study, planning, preliminary engineering design, right-of-way, CEQA/NEPA environmental assessment, identification of funding strategies/sources, and management of the 42 mile Coastal Rail / Bicycle Trail involving 7 jurisdictions in San Diego County. This unique project had many interesting and environmental design features and constraints that were incorporated into the project, including safety, grade crossings, environmental habitats ranging from riparian and wetland areas to sensitive sandstone cliffs. This project required extensive effort in public participation/community involvement, and the coordination of many local jurisdictions as well as requiring permits from just about every state and federal resource agency City of Oceanside. While at Transtech, prepared plans for the San Luis Rey Bikeway Path in the City of Oceanside. The Design included over three new miles Bikeway Path per Caltrans standards and meandered along river beads, across Cal state Route 76, under interstate 5, parallel with and within the railroad right of way, one Railroad undercrossing and along several City Streets. For the City of Alhambra. EFI designed 2008/2009 SRT and Alhambra Road Rehabilitation Proiect. This project was based on an SRT application. The two location are Alhambra Rd and 2ud Street and Commonwealth and Curtis. EFI prepared PS&E package for curb bulbouts, ADA ramps, In -pavement lighting, pedestrian activation devices, high visibility striping, lighting, speed feedback signs, and call boxes. -2011 For the City of Commerce, Designed the City SRTS improvements. This project was based on an SRTS application. The three locations are for improvements around three elementary schools Bandini Elementary, Rosewood Park Elementary, and Laguna Nueva Elementary. EFI prepared PS&E package for, ADA ramps, In -pavement lighting , pedestrian activation devices, high visibility striping, lighting, speed feedback signs, bulbouts at Atlantic and Jillson and in pavement lighting, and reconstruction of one street leg to remove dip in roadway. -2012 For the City of Rosemead, 6of15 Provides City Engineering services and is presently the contract City Engineer for the City of Rosemead. Prepared traffic modification plans for Rosemead and Valley_ & Rosemead and Mission as well as striping plans to incorporate adding bike lanes. Mission Drive improvement, provided the survey and design for Mission drive to include street and striping plans. Provided Stop Sign Warrant Analysis for Loftus and Bartlett and Angelus & Keim. Provided Traffic Calming measures for Rosemead PI and Earlswood Dr. Provides plan checking assistance for a variety of private development related plans. Traffic Sianal Desien For the City of Torrance. Prepared Street Improvement, Survey. Traffic Signal modifications. Striving, Peer Renort. fact sheet. & TSR for the modification of the intersection at Hawthorn Blvd and Skvnark Dr (Caltrans s Jurisdiction). -2011 Provided CMP Level of Service (LOS) analysis for 10 intersections for 2007,2009, 2011, &2013 Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design in the City of Torrance, at Wayne and Del Amo Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Cabrillo & Del Amo, Madrona and Torrance Blvd various location as part of the County of LA Synchronization project. Project Engineer for the design of Flashers at Lomita/Kent, Arlington/Lincoln, Anza Ave @ Nanot St, Citywide safe route to school for the City of Torrance. Project Engineer for design of the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Crenshaw Boulevard and Skypark Avenue (two separate projects) in the City of Torrance. Construction cost $2,000,000 For the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Prepared aueue analysis study for Haven Ave at the railroad. - Designed a Oneue Cutter Traffic Signal at Haven Ave and the railroad, In the City of Moreno Valley. Designed traffic signal modification, striving, traffic control plans, and Street Lighting on Perris Blvd at Dracaea Ave associated with the development of a Motel 6.- 2008 In the County of Riverside, Designed a Solar Flashing Beacon on Rancho California Road as part of deceleration and acceleration lanes for Wilson Creek Winery in the Temecula area.- 2008 In the City of Carson, Designed Traffic Signal, Strining plans, and traffic control elan for the SEC of 220th and Wilmington Ave 1 of 15 as part of the Watson Development. 2010 7, For the City of Alhambra, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design in the City of Alhambra at Fremont and Main, Fremont and Poplar, Fremont and Alhambra, Los Higos and Garfield. i Project Principal for Fremont widening project which is funded by State and Federal funds and required'i complete project and environmental report, including Right -of -Way, Relocation, SHPO, NEPA, SEQA, Noise, Parking, Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies, and being processed through Caltrans and FHWA. Construction cost $6,000,000. Project Principal for Valley Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction project which is funded by State and Federal funds. Construction cost $5.500.000. Project Manager for Valley Boulevard Improvements (Street, 17 signals, 5 miles of fiberoptic traffic signal communication system, street lighting, striping). Work involved field surveys, identification of existing conditions and conditions which are not safe and/or not in compliance with current standards, documentation of existing conditions with field inventory as well as with pictures, preparation plans on CADD, preparation of detail cost estimates, coordination with various agencies (Caltrans, City of LA, County, MTA). Construction Cost: $5,000,000. Project Manager for Fremont Widening, 710 Interim Surface Transportation Improvements, Fremont NCL to SCL Fiberoptic Traffic Signal Interconnect Projects (Local, State and Federally Funded 3 projects under 1 contract, involving street, traffic signals, 2 miles of fiberoptic traffic signal communication system, street lighting, striping). Work involved field surveys, identification of existing conditions and conditions which are not safe and/or not in compliance with current standards, documentation of existing conditions with field inventory as well as with pictures, preparation plans on CADD, preparation of detail cost estimates.. coordination with various agencies (Caltrans, City of LA, County, MTA). Construction Cost: $6,500,000. For the County LA traffic & Liuhtinis Division, Project Engineer for the various traffic signal modifications and installation, interconnect and radio corrected time base system installation plans and estimates in conjunction with traffic signal synchronization projects for various arterials in Los Angeles County including Arrow Highway and Huntington Drive/Alosta Avenue/Foothill Boulevard at over 50 locations. Signal modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. Project Engineer for the Synchronization projects for Los Angeles County. Assisted in field surveys to assess condition of the existing signal equipment, and in the preparation of traffic signal plans on AutoCAD. The projects involved over 60 signalized intersections on various arterials in Los Angeles County including SR210 on and off ramps, Citrus Ave., San Dimas Blvd, Foothill Avenue, Mountain Avenue. Signal modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. Project Engineer for the traffic signal modifications plans and estimates for the County's Hooper Avenue traffic signal synchronization project. Project Engineer for the traffic signal modifications plans and estimates for Los Angeles County Azusa 8 of 15 Avenue traffic signal synchronization project. Project was completed in 2004. Provided Counts to the County of Los Angeles for several locations including peak hour passenger car counts, the truck count by axle for traffic signal synchronization and signal warrants. County of Los Angeles- Azusa Ave, Gauge Ave, Torrance Blvd, and Western Ave Traffic Signal Projects TSSP- Project manager for County to provide traffic signal system design services. Supervised and designed traffic signal and interconnect plans for approximately 200 locations on various projects in the County of Los Angeles, involving over 10 different jurisdictions. Existing above and underground traffic signal equipment was reviewed to identify the improvements necessary to meet the objectives of the project prior to embarking upon the design phase, thereby avoiding any unnecessary improvements and the associated costs. Radio corrected time base units (W W V) were installed at each location, and loops, controllers and other equipment were installed to replace outdated equipment and provide for signal coordination throughout the corridor. Completion of the design component of this project required close coordination with County staff as well as several local jurisdictions. In the LA Countv area, Project Manager for Alameda Corridor Agency East (ACE) Rail Grade Crossing Improvement Project, Jump Start Design Package 1. Work involved traffic signals, signing and striping, roadway realignment and reconstruction, traffic control, and construction phasing as well as related improvements such as storm drain, water, sewer Iandscaping, underground utilities, etc. Project involved various streets encompassing 6 agencies and 14 locations in Los Angeles County. Construction Cost: $3,000,000. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Imperial and Biola and Francisquito Flashing Beacons Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal modification design at Huntington Dr and Sunnyslope Dr. For the Citv of Commerce, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Garfield Ave and Washington Blvd. Project engineer for various traffic signals upgrades along Washington Blvd and Garfield Ave. For the Citv of Temnle Citv, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal modifications for Las Tunas and Sultana. For the Citv of Glendale. Project engineer for the traffic signal modification for Broadway and Verdugo as a part of the Colorado Road construction Project and Verdugo interconnect from Glendale Avenue to La Crescenta Avenue. Project Engineer for the I-5/Colorado off -ramp realignment and reconstruction project in Glendale. Construction cost $1,000,000. City of Glendale- I-5 off ramp at Colorado. Prepared new alignment plan, signal plan, striping plan and traffic control plans. For the City of Anaheim. Project engineer for the Interconnect for Gilbert Avenue from Crescent to Broadway. Western Avenue, from Lincoln Avenue to Ball Road. Santa Ana Canyon Road from Imperial Highway to Solomon Road. Imperial Highway from Big Sky Lane to Avenido Bernardo North. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Weir Canyon and Santa Ana Canyon Road, Lincoln and Brookhurst, Lincoln and Dale, Big Sky Lane and Imperial Highway, Santa Ana Canyon and Solomon Road. Weir Canyon Road and Oak Canyon Road and Oak Canyon Road and Serrano Road. 9of15 In the Citv of Carson. Partially designed Traffic Signal. Striving plans, and traffic control plan for the SEC of 220th and Wilmington Ave as part of the Watson Development. 2010 In the City of Moreno Vallev, Ms. Mulrooney has partially designed a traffic signal, striping, traffic control plans, and Street Lighting on Perris Blvd associated with the development of a Motel 6. The following is accurate information for three (3) agencies for which proposer has performed similar design. and engineering work. City of Rosemead For Citv Engineerine Mr. Rafael Fajardo (626) 569-2151 Freedman Tung + Sasaki Gregory Tung, Principal 625 Second Street, Suite 280 San Francisco, CA 94107-2014 415-291-9487 (direct) City of Oceanside Mr. Davis Alm presently at Senior Transportation Engineer Perteet (425) 252-7700 Elie Farah Inc. (EFI) is a_ local_ California Certified Small Business Enterprise (91443340). It is an S corporation that has been in business for over eight years. We are located in the City of Corona. EFI provides Civil Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Land Surveying. We are a multi -disciplinary consulting firm with extensive experience and proven track record in all aspects of City Engineering Services. The principal has served public agencies in various capacities as City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, Construction Inspector, Project Manager, and Resident engineer. We Know public agency procedures, policies, and issues. EFI has the ability and qualifications to design of all the SR2S Improvements. We are familiar with the City and and the specific challenges that these type of improvements presents. We will provide the City with creative design options to construct the improvements in an efficient and cost effective manner. We have prepared Safe route to school improvements in the City of Alhambra, City of Commerce, and the City of Rosemead. A sample is included for reference The following is our contact information: Elie Farah, Inc. 1593 Liberty Drive, Corona, CA. 92881 Tel. (951)-999-0772, Fax (951)-278-4110 email• _ � aht�i:c''sicfa; ai1;n:.c,�;;, Web site: Elie Farai,'r,r..con; Contact Person: Elie Farah, MS, PE, PLS, TE, QSD/QSP 12 of 15 PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: I FEE II. Preliminary Design $10,540.00 Signinn & Striping 100 $85.00 $6,500.00 ESTIMATED RATE PER 50% design review TASK DESCRIPTION $85.00 HOURS OR OUR OR 24 $85.00 $2,040.00 LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL 1. Preliminary Project Design & Planning Final Design Approval 24 $85.00 Utility and data research 20 $85.00 $1,700.00 Field Work/Tcpographic Survey 48 $85.00 $4,080.00 Site Lavout/Site Study 100 $85.00 $8,500.00 Total Preliminary Project Design & Planning $14,280.00 II. Preliminary Design $10,540.00 Signinn & Striping 100 $85.00 $6,500.00 Cast estimate 12 $85.00 $1,020.00 50% design review 12 $85.00 $1,020.00 Total Preliminary Design $11,560.00 IV. SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE $10,540.00 III. Final Design 15 $85.00 $1,360.00 TOTAL SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE $1,360.00 Sianina & Striping 64 $85.00 $5,440.00 90% design review 24 $85.00 $2,040.00 100% design review _ 24 $85.00 $2,040.00 Final Design Approval 24 $85.00 $2,040.00 Total Final Design $11,560.00 IV. SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE Final Specs & Cast estimate 15 $85.00 $1,360.00 TOTAL SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE $1,360.00 V. UTILITY COORDINATION Underground Utility coordination with the utilities companies for Gas, Water, Sewer, Storm water, Telephone, Cable, Fire 8 $60.00 $640.00 TOTAL UTILITY COORDINATION $640.00 VI. Reimbursables such as printing, shipping, Fees paid to utility companies, etc... -ESTIMATE $1,500.00 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEE FOR TASK I thru VI $39,880.00 OPTIONAL j VII. BID & AWARD Assist in answering questions from Bidders & City Staff 4 $85.00 $340.00 Assist in Preparing Bid Addenda 4 $85,00 $340.00 Review of bids & make recommendations on award of Contract 6 $85.00 $510.00 13 of 15 _,:a r-urCeti, Irc PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL j Tasks: FEE ESTIMATED RATE PER TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL TOTAL BID & AWARD (Allowance) $1,190.00 VIII. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PHASE Attend Pre -Construction Conference 4 $85.00 $340.00 Responding to RFI's (allowance) 8 $85.00 $680.00 Submittal review (allowance) 12 $85.00 $1,020.00 Provide As -Built Drawings _ _ 6 _$80.00_ _ $480.00 Total Construction Administrative Phase (Allowance) $2,520.001 CLARIFICATIONS & EXCLUSIONS 1.Our proposal does not include utility relocation design plans such as water lines, sewer lines, or storm drain lines 2. Any governmental agency fees, application fees, plan check fees, or any other fees that must be paid to any other parties. 3. Excludes Construction surveying including horizontal control plan, construction management and inspection (unless optional items are approved and included in contract). - 4=0n site Hydraulics, retaining walls structural calculations, structural calculations 5. Easements, legal descriptions. LLA, etc... 6. Traffic impact Analysis and Traffic Control Plans 7. Obtaininq signatures from other parties on olans, application forms, clearance documents, or other documents. 1 8. Major Changes to the layout after the plans is 60% or more complete 9. The cost of any other professional services that may be required such as, but not limited to soils engineer, geologist, landscape architect, architects, and electrical engineer other than what is Indicated and /or title report. _ 1 I EFI will meet the schedule of 50 working days as described in the RFP QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) PROGRAM & VALUE ENGINEERING QA/QC is an important process in EFI's project management. This process provide an objective review of the work done by different professional at various milestone in the project development. This che6 is provided by a senior engineer with experience in the specific project type. We understands that the quality, accuracy and correctness of the products prepared by EFI is our full responsibility. EFI approaches value engineering as a continuous and evolving function throughout the entin preliminary and design phases of the project. Value engineering is treated as an integral part o developing design criteria and ultimate incorporation into the project plans, specifications and estimates Even during the first site visits, we're always considering alternatives and developing ideas that may b analyzed during the course of the project. This significantly reduces the chance of a major desigl alternative being identified by a "value engineering team" after the project is designed, which woul cause a tremendous redesign effort and considerable time delays. 14 of 15 ,_1!e 1 -Cel 6"-. TK Staffing and Resources Management EFI has necessary staffing, equipment and resources to undertake project assignments and complete them j within required schedule. Proposo!far SR2S-Temple Cit do, 15 of 15 June 25, 2013 Revised July 1, 2013 Mr. Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director City of TEMPLE CITY 9701 Las Tunas Drive,. Temple City, CA 91780 ATTACHMENT D Via mail Subject: Proposal for the preparation of PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City Dear Mr. Perisco: Per your request, Elie Farah, Inc. (EFI) is pleased to submit this Proposal the preparation of PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transpmtation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City. - - - Please consider the following: EFI is a California Certified Small Business Firm (#1443340). This provide us with extreme flexibility. W are able to control cost and meet aggressive schedules. The principal is the project manager and the single point of contact. Elie Farah will be the Project Manager/Traffic Engineer/and Civil Engineer. I am personally involved in all aspects of the design/review and management of each project ensuring seamless results. Most projects are designed/reviewed by me. Larger firms tend to assign junior engineers with little oversight. d. I am registered as a Civil Engineer and a Traffic Engineer with over twenty five (28) years of experience. This provides me with a perspective not shared by many. I am able to analyze projects from various aspects and recognize and avoid potential conflicts and costly construction problems before they occur. die EFI has recently designed Bike lanes in the City of Rosemead and is part of the team for the Las Tunas beautification project which includes Bike facilities. While at Transtech, I designed Bike path in Oceanside and a preliminary alignment for 42 miles Bike Trail extending firm Oceanside to the City of San Diego. a� As a former Consulting City Engineer for various Cities., plan checker, a. construction manager/resident engineer, and a design engineer with a diversified background, I am familiar with the many design requirements. I strive to nrovide a PS&E nackage that is clear, concise, and complete. 1 insure that final 1 of 14 Elie Farah, Inc Dlans are once again checked in the field with the designer prior to finalization. This minimizes change orders and claims during the construction phase ds EFI has delivered manv Droiects as Dromised on time and on budget. Please feel free to check our references. EFT will not bid or accept ajob unless we have the qualifications and can meet the timeline_ 96 EFI has successfully completed many projects on time and on budget. Our list of client Cities includes the City of Torrance, City of Irwindale, City of Alhambra, City of Rosemead, City of Commerce, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Temple City, City of Upland, City of Villa Park, Orange County Public Works, City of Lake Elsinore City of South Pasadena, and City of El Monte. We look forward to having the opportunity to discuss our qualifications and approach in a greater detail. Should you have any questions or need additional information, Please call me at (951) 898-0772.. Sincerely, Elie Farah, Inc. Elie Farah, MS, PE, TE, LIS, QSD/QSP Principal Engineer 2of14 Elie Farrah, Inc Subject Section 1 Scopeof Work..................................................................... 04 Section 2 Project Staff Qualifications..................................................... 05 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 References................................................................................. 12 Company Qualifications............................................................. 12 Cost Proposal..................................................................... 13 Schedule.................................................................................. 14 3of14 1,J PM • • s o s EFI will complete projects in an efficient and cost effective manner. In performing services, EFI will follow the following parameters: ✓ The scope of work for the project includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1 of the RFP. ✓ Provide all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. ✓ Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. ✓ Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create abase map of existing conditions. ✓ Prepare plans and details. ✓ Prepare specifications. ✓ Prepare cost estimates. ✓ Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. ✓ Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. ✓ Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. ✓ Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: o First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. o City will take 2 weeks for the review. o Filial submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review comments. ✓ Provide hi -weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. ✓ Attend 3 project meetings. ✓ Filial Product: PS&E Bid Package ready for bidding, including I wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, Ms Word file of Specifications, Excel file of Estimates, pdf file of all other documents. EFI continues monitoring the schedule and the progress of the design. Additional resources will be employed in case of a slip in the project schedule. EFI will complete the design on time & on budget k-24 -,- 114!4i ChAiiVr1i o—IWYIIIILr3=1111s jM 4of14 Elie Farah, hnc I:d4.YsL'il'�eliJ:�kIMIJ_I �;1.��■Ja:t�'l�ltl�la� EFI ProiectManner ElieFarah, PE, TE................................................................................................................Civil Engineer/Traffic Engineer kik-LA, US lF- QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE EDUCATION MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 1985 University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 1983 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ASSOCIATES OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1981 Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana REGISTRATION REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, CA 4C42080 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, CA #LS8258 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CA TR #1926 QSD/QSP #21962 Mr. Farah is a registered Professional Civil Engineer, and Traffic Engineer with a diversified background and more than 28 years of diverse experience. The following is a Partial su nmary: For the Citv of Rosemead. SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS 5of14 FIPe Farah, Grc Prepared traffic modification clans for Rosemead and Vallev £ Rosemead and Mission as well as striping plans to incorporate adding bike lanes. Provides City Engineering services and is cresently the contract Citv En¢ineer for the Citv of Rosemead. Mission Drive improvement, provided the survey and design for Mission drive to include street and striping plans. Provided Stop Sign Warrant Analysis for Loftus and Bartlett and Angelus R Keim. Provided Traffic Calming measures for Rosemead PI and Earlswood Dr. Provides plan checking assistance for a variety of private development related plans. For the Temole City. EFI is the Civil/Traffic consultant for the Las Tunas Beautification Project. Bicycle lane are an integral part of the design San Dieeo Countv, While at Transtech, prepared feasibility study, planning, preliminary engineering design, right-of-way, CEQA/NEPA environmental assessment, identification of funding strategies/sources, and management of the 42 mile Coastal Rail / Bicycle Trail involving 7 jurisdictions in San Diego County. This unique project had many interesting and environmental design features and constraints that were incorporated into the project, including safety, grade crossings, environmental habitats ranging from riparian and wetland areas to sensitive sandstone cliffs. This project required extensive effort in public participation/connnunity involvement, and the coordination of many local jurisdictions as well as requiring permits from just about every state and federal resource agency Citv of Oceanside, While at Transtech, prepared plans for the San Luis Rey Bikeway Path in the City of Oceanside. The Design included over three new miles Bikeway Path per Caltrans standards and meandered along river beads, across Cal state Route 76, under interstate 5, parallel with and within the railroad right of way, one Railroad undercrossing and along several City Streets. For the Citv of Alhambra, EFI designed 2003/2009 SRT and Alhambra Road Rehabilitation Proiect. This project was based on an SRT application. The two location are Alhambra Rd and 2"d Street and Commonwealth and Curtis. EFI prepared PS&E package for curb bulbouts, ADA ramps, In -pavement lighting , pedestrian activation devices, high visibility striping, lighting, speed feedback signs, and call boxes. -2011 For the Citv of Commerce, Designed the City SRTS improvements. This project was based on an SRTS application. The three locations are for improvements around three elementary- schools Bandini Elementary, Rosewood Park Elementary, and Laguna Nueva Elementary. EFI prepared PSRE package for, ADA ramps, In -pavement lighting , pedestrian activation devices, high visibility striping, lighting, speed feedback signs, bulbouts at Atlantic and ,lillson and in pavement lighting, and reconstruction of one street leg to remove dip in roadway. -2012 For the Citv of Rosemead, Provides City Engineering services and is uresently the contract Citv En6ineer for the CAN, of Rosemead. 6of14 Elis Pen ah, Inc Prepared traffic modification clans for Rosemead and Vallev & Rosemead and Mission as well as striping plans to incorporate adding bike lanes. Mission Drive improvement, provided the survey and design for Mission drive to include street and striping plans. Provided Stop Sign Warrant Analysis for Loftus and Bartlett and Angelus & Keim. Provided Traffic Calming measures for Rosemead PI and Earlswood Dr. Provides plan checking assistance for a variety of private development related plans. Traffic Signal Design For the Citv of Torrance, Prepared Street Improvement, Survev, Traffic Signal modifications, Striping, Peer Report, fact sheet, & TSR for the modification of the intersection at Hawthorn Blvd and Skvpark Dr (Caltrans Jurisdiction). -2011 Provided CMP Level of Service (LOS) analysis for 10 intersections for 2007,3009, 2011, &3013 Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design in the City of Torrance, at Wayne and Del Amo Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Cabrillo & Del Amo, Madrona and Torrance Blvd various location as part of the County of LA Synchronization project. Project Engineer for the design of Flashers at Lomita/Kent, Arlington/Lincoln, Anza Ave a Narrot St, Citywide safe route to school for the City of Torrance. Project Engineer for design of the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Crenshaw Boulevard and Skypark Avenue (two separate projects) in the City of Torrance. Construction cost $2,000,000 For the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, Prepared oueue analvsis studv for Haven Ave at the railroad. - Designed a Oueue Cutter Traffic Sianal at Haven Ave and the railroad, In the Citv of Moreno Vallev, Designed traffic signal modification. striping, traffic control Dlans, and Street Lighting on Perris Blvd at Dracaea Ave associated with the development of a Motel 6.- 2008 In the Countv of Riverside, Designed a Solar Flashing Beacon on Rancho California Road as part of deceleration and acceleration lanes for Wilson Creek Winery in the Temecula area.- 3008 In the Citv of Carson, Designed Traffic Signal, Striving plans, and traffic control plan for the SEC of 230th and Wihnineton Ave as part of the Watson Development. 2010 7ofld flie FtlPO17, 1170 For the Citv of Alhambra, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design in the City of Alhambra at Fremont and Main, Fremont and Poplar, Fremont and Alhambra, Los Higos and Garfield. Project Principal for Fremont widening project which is funded by State and Federal funds and required complete project and environmental report, including Right -of -Way, Relocation, SHPO, NEPA, SEQA, Noise, Parking, Economic, Hazardous Materials technical studies, and being processed through Caltrans and FHWA. Construction cost $6,000,000. Project Principal for Valley Boulevard Widening and Reconstruction project which is funded by State and Federal funds. Construction cost $5,500,000. Project Manager for Valley Boulevard Improvements (Street, 17 signals, 5 miles of fiberoptic traffic signal communication system, street lighting, striping). Work involved field surveys, identification of existing conditions and conditions which are not safe and/or not in compliance with current standards, documentation of existing conditions with field inventory as well as with pictures, preparation plans on CADD, preparation of detail cost estimates, coordination with various agencies (Caltrans, City of LA, County, MTA). Construction Cost: $5,000,000. Project Manager for Fremont Widening, 710 Interim Surface Transportation Improvements, Fremont NCL to SCL Fiberoptie Traffic Signal Interconnect Projects (Local, State and Federally Funded 3 projects under I contract, involving street, traffic signals, 2 miles of fiberoptic traffic signal communication system, street lighting, striping). Work involved field surveys, identification of existing conditions and conditions which are not safe and/or not in compliance with current standards, documentation of existing conditions with field inventory as well as with pictures, preparation plans on CADD, preparation of detail cost estimates, coordination with various agencies (Caltrans, City of LA, County, MTA). Construction Cost: $6,500,000. For the Countv LA traffic & Li2htin2 Division, Project Engineer for the various traffic signal modifications and installation, interconnect and radio corrected time base system installation plans and estimates in conjunction with traffic signal synchronization projects for various arterials in Los Angeles County including Arrow Highway and Huntington Drive/Alosta Avenue/Foothill Boulevard at over 50 locations. Signal modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. Project Engineer for tine Synchronization projects for Los Angeles County. Assisted in field surveys to assess condition of the existing signal equipment, and in the preparation of traffic signal plans on AutoCAD. The projects involved over 60 signalized intersections on various arterials in Los Angeles County including SR210 on and off ramps, Citrus Ave., San Dimas Blvd, Foothill Avenue, Mountain Avenue. Signal modification improvements included equipment upgrades, signal phasing upgrades and installation of radio correct time base units (WWV) for signal coordination as well as physical intersection improvements. Project Engineer for the traffic signal modifications plans and estimates for the County's Hooper Avenue traffic signal synchronization project. Project Engineer for the traffic signal modifications plans and estimates for Los Angeles County Azusa Avenue traffic signal synchronization project. Project was completed in 2004. Provided Coverts to the County of Los Angeles for several locations including peak hour passenger car counts, 8of14 Elie Farah, Inc the truck count by axle for traffic signal synchronization and signal warrants. County of Los Angeles- Azusa Ave, Gauge Ave, Torrance Blvd, and Western Ave Traffic Signal Projects TSSP- Project manager for County to provide traffic signal system design services. Supervised and designed traffic signal and interconnect plans for approximately 200 locations on various projects in the County of Los Angeles, involving over 10 different jurisdictions. Existing above and underground traffic signal equipment was reviewed to identify the improvements necessary to meet the objectives of the project prior to embarking upon the design phase, thereby avoiding any unnecessary improvements and the associated costs. Radio corrected time base units (WWV) were installed at each location, and loops, controllers and other equipment were installed to replace outdated equipment and provide for signal coordination throughout the corridor. Completion of the design component of this project required close coordination with County staff as well as several local jurisdictions. In the LA County area, Project Manager for Alameda Corridor Agency East (ACE) Rail Grade Crossing Improvement Project, Jump Start Design Package 1. Work involved traffic signals, signing and striping, roadway realignment and reconstruction, traffic control, and construction phasing as well as related improvements such as storm drain, water, sewer landscaping, underground utilities, etc. Project involved various streets encompassing 6 agencies and 14 locations in Los Angeles County. Construction Cost: S3,000,000. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Imperial and Biola and Francisquito Flashing Beacons Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal modification design at Huntington Dr and Sun yslope Dr. For the Citv of Commerce. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Garfield Ave and Washington Blvd. Project engineer for various traffic signals upgrades along Washington Blvd and Garfield Ave. For the Citv of Temple Citv, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal modifications for Las Tunas and Sultana. For the Citv of Glendale, Project engineer for the traffic signal modification for Broadway and Verdugo as a part of the Colorado Road construction Project and Verdugo interconnect from Glendale Avenue to La Crescenta Avenue. Project Engineer for the I-5/Colorado off -ramp realignment and reconstruction project in Glendale. Construction cost $1,000,000. City of Glendale- I-5 off ramp at Colorado. Prepared new alignment plan, signal plan, striping plan and traffic control plans. For the Citv of Anaheim, Project engineer for the Interconnect for Gilbert Avenue from Crescent to Broadway. Western Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Ball Road. Santa Ana Canyon Road from Imperial Highway to Solomon Road. Imperial Highway from Big Sky Larne to Avenido Bernardo North. Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Weir Canyon and Santa Ana Canyon Road, Lincoln and Brookhurst, Lincoln and Dale, Big Slay Lane and Imperial Highway, Santa Ana Canyon and Solomon Road. Weir Canyon Road and Oak Canyon Road and Oak Canyon Road and Serrano Road. Project Engineer- Street reconstruction for Santa Ana Canyon Road and Tustin Avenue to modify the intersection from a Four way stop to a fully signalized intersection. The plans encompassed the reconstruction of 300 feet of each approach to meet Caltrans Standards. 9 of ld Elie Farah, file In the Citv of Pomona, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal modifications for Dudley & Elwood as part of the Pomona Unified School District improvements. For the Citv of Industrv, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal for Albatros and Colima intersection. For the Citv of Lona Beach, Project Manager for Spring Street and 605 Freeway off -ramp realignment and widening project -Long Beach. Construction cost $1,000,000. In the Citv of Encinitas, project engineer for the Encinitas Boulevard from First Street to Village Square Road interconnect. For the Citv of Temecula, Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal for Route 79 and La Paz For the Citv of Solana Beach, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at Stevens Avenue and Valley Avenue. In the Cite of San Marcos, Project Engineer for the Traffic Signal design at airport Road and Rancho Sante Fe Road and "C" Street, In the Citv of Oceanside, Street widening of Oceanside Blvd. at El Camino Real For the Citv of Hanford. Project Engineer for the preparation of the traffic signal and Street Widening Design at 10th and Lacey, and Lacey and Greenfield, Grangeville and 12th, Route 198 and 12`x'' Street lighting Design Citv of Alhambra -City-wide Street Lighting System Improvements- prepared street lighting plans, specifications, and estimates for lighting improvements as part of the city-wide lighting upgrade and conversion program. The project plans will be integrated with the City's GIS system (Oracle based, central GIS) to create a street lighting master plan. The total project cost is $3,000,000 Design for City of Alhambra area 13, 13, and 14 involving 50 sheets of street lighting plans using GSX. Cite of San Marino -City-wide Street Lighting System Improvements - prepared street lighting plans, specifications, and estimates for lighting improvements as part of the City-wide lighting upgrade and conversion program. Including voltage drop Calculations. The total project cost is $500,000. Citv of Culver Citv-Street Lighting, CDBG Project Prepared roadway lighting plans, specifications, and estimates for lighting improvements at Warner, Steller, Statham, Hayden, and Higuera including a City Parking lot. The project was funded under the CDBG program. The design included preparation of lighting level calculations and determination of iso -foot candles, electrical load calculations, service cabinet design and preparation of complete PS&E for bidding. Assisted the City in the bidding and construction of the project. Project cost approximately Citv of Bellflower performed project management for the federally funded installation of raised pavement markers on all arterial streets including all federal funded paperwork. Citv of Nest Hollvnvood performed project management for the federally funded crosswalk textured pavement and 10 of 14 Elie Furuh. 1170 in -pavement lighting on Sunset Boulevard. Plan cheekina Performed plan checking for the City of Rosemead, City of Alhambra, City of Bellflower, City of La Habra Heights, City of Commerce, City of San Bernardino, City of Pomona, & City of South Pasadena for street, traffic signal, striping, TIA, & street lighting. Citv Engineering • Provided City Engineering services on a consulting basis for the City of Rosemead (City engineer), City of Alhambra (Assistant City Engineer), City of La Habra Heights (Assistant City engineer), City of Commerce (Acting City Engineer), and City of Pomona (extension of Staff). ILHLE MULROONEY. PE IDESIGN ENGINEF_R, QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE EDUCATION 1985 California State Polytechnic University Pomona, CA B.S., Civil Engineering. Graduated with Honors REGISTRATION REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, CA #C47642 Project Manager-Willdan Associates -1984-2004 Responsible for the preparation of plans and specifications for a variety of public works projects. Some of the types of projects include: Highway Interchanges, Grade Separation Projects, Sound Walls, River Embankments, Campgrounds, Traffic Design, City Streets, Rail Projects. Ms. Mulrooney is a registered Professional Civil Engineer with more than 23 years of diverse experience in a wide variety of Public Works design Projects. The following is a partial list while working with EFI: For the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, nartialty designed a Oueue Cutter Traffic Signal at Haven Ave and the railroad In the City of Torrance, Partially designed Prepared Street Improvement, Survev. Traffic Signal modifications. Striping, Peer Report, fact sheet, & TSR for the modification of the intersection at Hawthorn Blvd and. Skvnarlc Dr (Caltrans Jurisdiction). -2011 In the Citv of Carson. Partially designed Traffic Signal. Striping Dlans, and traffic control plan for the SEC of 220th and Wilmington Ave as part of the Watson Development. 2010 In the Citv of Moreno Vallev, Ms. Mulrooney has partially designed a traffic signal, striping, traffic control plans, and Street Lighting on Perris Blvd associated with the development of a Motel 6. 11 of 14 Elie Farah, Inc The following is actuate information for three (3) agencies for which proposer has performed similar design and engineering work. City of Rosemead For City Engineering Mr. Rafael Fajardo (626) 569-2151 City of Oceanside Mn Davis A hn presently at Freedman Tung + Sasaki Senior Transportation Engineer Gregory Tung, Principal Perteet 625 Second Street, Suite 280 (425) 252-7700 San Francisco, C.4 94107-2014 415-291-9487 (direct) .: Elie Farah Inc. (HFI) is a local California Certified Small Business Enterprise (91443340). It is an S corporation that has been in business for over eight years. We are located in the City of Corona. EFI provides Civil Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Land Surveying. We are a multi -disciplinary consulting firm with extensive experience and proven track record in all aspects of City Engineering Services. The principal has served public agencies in various capacities as City Engineer, City Traffic Engineer, Construction Inspector, Project Manager„and Resident engineer. We Know public agency procedures, policies, and issues. EFI has the ability and qualifications to design of all the SR2S Improvements. We are familiar with the City and and the specific challenges that these type of improvements presents. We will provide the City with creative design options to construct the improvements in an efficient and cost effective manner. We have prepared Safe route to school improvements in the City of Alhambra, City of Commerce, and the City of Rosemead. A sample is included for reference The following is our contact information: Elie Farah, Inc. 1593 Liberty Drive, Carona, CA. 92881 Tel. (951)-898-0772, Fax (951)-278-4110 email: efarahac eliefarahinc.com Web site: ElieFarahlnc.com Contact Person: Elie Farah, MS, PE, PLS, TE, QSD/QSP 12 of 14 Elie Farah, Inc Section 5 CCost Plronosal PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: FEE ESTIMATED RATE PER TASK DESCRIPTION HOURSOR HOUROR LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL I. Preliminary Project Design & Planning Utility and data research 20 $85.00 $1,700.00 Field Work/Topographic Survey 48 $85.00 $4,080.00 Site LavoutlSite Study 50 $85.00 $4,250.00 Total Preliminary Project Design & Planning II. Preliminary Design Signing & Strninq Cost estimate 50% design review Total Preliminary Design III. Final Design —� &gninq.&Striping . 90% design review 100% design review Final Design Approval Total Final Design IV. SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE Final Specs & Cost estimate TOTAL SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE V. UTILITY COORDINATION Underground Utility coordination with the utilities companies for Gas, Water, Sewer, Storm water, Telephone,. Cable, Fire TOTAL UTILITY COORDINATION VI. Reimbursables such as printing, shipping, Fees paid to utility companies, etc.., -ESTIMATE Engineering Support During Construction TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEE FOR TASK I thru VI 50 $85.00 12 $85.00 12 $85.00 40 $85.00. 24 $85.00 24 $85.00 24 $85.00 16 $85.00 8 $80.00 8 $8000 CLARIFICATIONS & EXCLUSIONS i.Our proposal does not include utility relocation design plans such as water lines, sewer lines, or storm drain lines 13 of 14 $10,030.00 $4,250.00 $1,020.00 $1,020.00 $6,290.00 1 .$.3,400.00 1 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $9,520.00 1 $1,360.00 I $1,360.00 $640.00 $640.00 $1,500.00 $640.00 $29,980.00 Elie Farah, htc PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: FEE TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATEDRATE PER HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION TOTAL 2. Any governmental agency fees, application fees, plan check fees, or any other fees that must be paid to any other parties. 3. Excludes Construction surveying including horizontal control plan, construction management and inspection (unless optional items are approved and included in contract). 4. On site Hydraulics, retaining walls structural calculations, structural calculations 5. Construction Management & Inspection 6. Traffic impact Analysis and Traffic Control Plans 7. Obtaining signatures from other parties on plans, application forms, clearance documents, or other documents. 8. Maier Changes to the layout after the plans is 60% or more complete 9. The cost of any other professional services that may be required such as, but not limited to soils engineer, geologist, landscape architect, architects, and electrical engineer other than what Is indicated and /or title report. Section 6: Schedule EFI will meet the schedule of 50 working days as described in the RFP QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) PROGRAM & VALUE ENGINEERING QA/QC is an important process in EFI's project management. This process provide an objective review of the work done by different professional at various milestone in the project development. This check is provided by a senior engineer with experience in the specific project type. We understands that the quality, accuracy and correctness of the products prepared by EFI is our full responsibility. EFI approaches value engineering as a continuous and evolving function throughout the entire preliminary and design phases of the project. Value engineering is treated as an integral part of developing design criteria and ultimate incorporation into the project plans, specifications and estimates. Even during the first site visits, we're always considering alternatives and developing ideas that may be analyzed during the course of the project. This significantly reduces the chance of a major design alternative being identified by a `value engineering teatn" after the project is designed, which would cause a tremendous redesign effort and considerable time delays. Staffing and Resources Management EFT has necessary staffing, equipment and resources to undertake project assignments and complete them within required schedule. Proposal far BTA DeOgjr 3Ervlcee-Temple City -eacladnrg Las Tiam.doe 14 of 14 Elie ralvic Inc ATTACHMENT E CK/7►f.Y117�171 _�►` I�il a Dom'. �I'Ctl�f:1�l1711�1U 111►Y 11 Preparation of PS&E for Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Project By and Between THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation ELIE FARAH, INC. AIV #4822-7830-457.0 v1 -1- AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA AND ELIE FARAH, INC. (Preparation of PS&E for STA Project) This Agreement for Consultant Services ("Agreement") is entered into as of this 16th day of July, 2013 by and between the City of TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation ("City') and Elie Farah, Inc., a Corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. City has sought, by request for proposals, the performance of the design and engineering services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Consultant was selected by the City on the basis of Consultant's demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. D. Pursuant to the City of Temple City's Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Consultant Services Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this Agreement. E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT. Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the scope of services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit "A." Should the scope of services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Consultant shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement pursuant to Section 21 of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the RIV 94832-7830-1520 v1 - I - Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Consultant to continue performing the scope of services until such services are complete. SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," which is incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to or outside of those set forth in this Agreement or listed in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," Unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or City Manager of City. Consultant shall be compensated for any such additional services in the amounts and in the manner agreed to by the City Council or City Manager. SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. (a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit "B" "Compensation," which is incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed twenty nine thousand nine hundred eighty dollars, ($29,980.00), unless additional compensation is approved in writing by the City Council or City Manager. (b) Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub -category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub -consultant contracts. Sub -consultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit "B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sun), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. (c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant's correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. RIV 44822-7330-4520 v1 - 1) - SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE. City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant's work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Consultant's work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Consultant's work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City's acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Consultant's work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, sections 16 and 17, pertaining to indemnification and insurance, respectively. SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Consultant. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warrants related to Standard of Performance and found in Section 9 of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 7. CONSULTANT'S BOOKS AND RECORDS. (a) Consultant shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Consultant's performance of services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. (b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and RN #4822-7830-4520 v1 -3- records shall be made available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. (c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City and that such documents and records be maintained by the requesting party. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors -in -interest and authorized representatives. SECTION 8. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. (a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Consultant , nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such lights. SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this Section 9, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria are set forth in the Scope of Work that shall also be applicable to Consultants work under this Contract. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of perfonn mce or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general. If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer RIV '#4822-78304520 v1 - 4 - files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warranties related to Standard of Performance shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents. SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES. Consultant shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section. SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS It is the understanding of City and Consultant that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, "construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work. SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement. SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et see ., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City. SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. (a) Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant's performance of services under RN 44822-7830-4520 V1 -5 - this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant will, perform non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the scope of work under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered 'voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant , its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ffiV 44822-7830-4520 V1 - 6 - SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION. (a) Indemnification by Desiffn Professional. As provided under Civil Code Section 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims. actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders, judgments, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, (collectively "Claims") to the extent same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub - consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement, with the understanding that in the event Claims are found by the bier of fact to have been caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the City and its contractors and consultants, and Consultant, damages and expenses from both indemnity and duty to defend obligations shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence. (b) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub -consultant / contract or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the tennination of this Agreement or this section. (c) Citv's Sole Nealieence. The provisions of this Section 16 do not apply to Claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. SECTION 17. INSURANCE. Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "C" "Insurance," which is incorporated herein by this reference. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Consultant agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request. SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT. The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant's duties or obligations under this RIV 44822-7830-4520 V1 -7- Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Council. Any attempted assigmnent shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this Agreement. City acknowledges, however, that Consultant, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors. SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. (a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Consultant. In the event such notice is given, Consultant shall cease inunediately all work in progress. (b) Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City. (c) If either Consultant or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Consultant, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Consultant or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Consultant's possession shall be returned to City. Consultant shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Consultant, prepared as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same mariner as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. SECTION 21. DEFAULT. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, wben the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alterative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. RN 44322-7530-4520 v1 - 8- SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS. Consultant shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes. SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY. All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement. SECTION 24. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To City: City of Temple City Attn: City Manager 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 To Consultant: Elie Farah, Inc. 1593 Liberty Drive Corona, CA 92881 Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represents and warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative, following approval of this Agreement by the City Council. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make minor amendments to this Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not materially change the Agreement RIV 44822-7830-4520 V1 -9- or make a commitment of additional funds of the City. All other changes, modifications, and amendments shall require the prior approval of the City Council. SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. SECTION 28. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. SECTION 29. WAIVER. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Los Angeles. SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES. In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other Agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Consultant and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other Agreements, whether oral or written, made by any party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid and binding unless in writing duly executed by the parties or their authorized representatives. SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY. RIV #4822-7830-3520 vl -10- If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first -above written. ATTEST: Peggy Kuo City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Eric S. Vail City Attorney IC Its: IN CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Its: Jose Pulido, City Manager NOTE: CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR RN 44822-7830-4520 vl - 11 - OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPER'S BUSINESS ENTITY. RIV#4822-7830-4520 v - I2 - CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, , personally appeared , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) wbose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within histrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatme(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoillg paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TiTLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) RN 44822-7830-4520 V1 DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, personally appeared ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the withht inshuraem and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fi-audulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY -IN -PACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSONS) OR ENTITY(IES)) RIV 44822-7830-4520 V1 TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNERS) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 6676 vl EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following Services: A. The Scope of work for the projects includes providing all necessary services to prepare PS&E bid package for the project in compliance with the funding documents included in Attachment 1 of the RFP. B. Provide all necessary services to ensure the project is completed efficiently and in full compliance with applicable requirements. C. Review funding application and gain a clear understanding of the proposed improvements included in the project. D. Conduct necessary field reviews and surveys to create a base map of existing conditions. E. Prepare plans and details. F. Prepare specifications. G. Prepare cost estimates. H. Coordinate with SCE for any service feed points needed for the improvements. Coordinate with utility companies to obtain existing utility information as necessary. J. Revise documents based on comments received from City and other regulatory agencies. II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Final Product: PS&E Bid Package ready for bidding, including 1 wet signed plan set, 2 hard copies, AutoCAD file of plans, MsWord file of Specifications, Excel file of Estimates, pdf file of all other documents. III. During performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Provide bi-weekly status updates of progress to City via e-mail. RN 44822-7870-4520 yr A-1 B. Attend 3 project meetings. IV. The tangible work products and status reports will be delivered to the City pursuant to the following schedule: A. Submit a project design schedule to City based on following milestones: ® First submittal of PS&E package to City for review shall be made within 30 working days of City's authorization to proceed with the project. ® City will take 2 weeks for the review. ® Final submittal of PS&E package ready for bidding to City shall be made within 10 working days of receiving City's review continents. V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: 6a76 v1 A. Elie Farah, PE, TE Civil Engineer/Traffic Engineer B. Julie Mulrooney, PE Design Engineer VI. AMENDMENT The Scope of Services, including services, work products, and personnel, are subject to change by mutual Agreement. In the absence of mutual Agreement regarding the need to change any aspects of performance, Consultant shall comply with the Scope of Services as indicated above. RIV #4522-7330-4520 vl ��IN EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall use the following rates of pay in the performance of the Services: RN #4822-7830-4520 Vl B-1 PS&E for BTA, Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: TASK DESCRIPTION I 1. Preliminary Project Design & Planning Utility and data research Field Work/Topopraphic Survey Site Lavout/Site Study I Total Preliminary Project Design & Planninq II. Preliminary Design I Signlnq & Stripinq Cost estimate I 50% design review Total Preliminary Design 111. Final Design Siqninq & Stripinq 00% desiqn review 100% design review Final Design Approval Total Final Desiqn IV. SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE Final Specs & Cost estimate TOTAL SPECS AND COST ESTIMATE V. UTILITY COORDINATION Underground Utility coordination with the utilities companies for Gas, Water, Sewer, Storm water, Telephone, Cable, Fire TOTAL UTILITY COORDINATION VI. Reimbursables such as printing, shipping, Fees paid to utility companies, etc... -ESTIMATE Engineering Support Durinq Construction TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEE FOR TASK I thru VI FEE ESTIMATED 'RATE PER HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION 20 $85.00 48 $85.00 50 $85.00 50 $85.00 12 $85.00 12 $85.00 40 $85.00 24 $85.00 24 $85,00 24 $85.00 16 $85.00 I CLARIFICATIONS & EXCLUSIONS 11.Our proposal does not include utility relocation design plans such as water lines, sewer lines, or storm drain lines RFV #4822-7830-4520 vl B_2 TOTAL $1,700.00 $4,080.00 I $4,250.00 I $10,030.00 I $4,250.00 $1,020.00 $1,020.00 $6,290:00 $3,400.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $9,620.00 I I $1,360 00 I $1,360.00 $640.00 $640.00 $1,500.00 $640.00 I $29,980.00 I PS&E for BTA; Bicycle Transportation Account (State Funded) Project in the City of Temple City FEE PROPOSAL Tasks: FEE ESTIMATED RATE PER TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS OR HOUR OR LOCATIONS LOCATION iTOTAL 2. Any governmental agency fees, application fees, plan check fees, or any other fees that must be paid to any other parries. 3. Excludes Construction surveying including horizontal control plan, construction management and inspection (unless optional items are approved and included in contract). 4- On site Hydraulics, retaining walls structural calculations, structural calculations 5. Construction Management & Inspection 6. Traffic impact Analysis and Traffic Control Plans 7. Obtaining signatures from other parties on plans, application forms, clearance documents, or other documents. 8. Major Changes to the layout after the plans is 60% or more complete 9. The cost of any other professional services that may be required such as, but not limited to soils engineer, geologist, landscape architect, architects, and electrical engineer other than what is Indicated and for title report. II. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. B. Line items for all supplies properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all travel properly charged to the Services. D. Line items for all equipment properly charged to the Services. E. Line items for all materials properly charged to the Services. F. Line items for all subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $29,980.00, as provided in Section 4 of this Agreement. RN 44822-7830-4520 vt B-3 EXHIBIT "C" INSURANCE A. Insurance Reauirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City Manager or City Counsel, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: 1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a "claims made" basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least 3 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant's services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 3 -year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. 2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of professional liability insurance no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. B. Other Provisions. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City. C. Other Reauirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 1. Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides. 2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims. RIV #4822-78304520 V1 C-1 3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. RIV 44822-7930-4520 VI C-2