Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutJFOCP 2008-09-29Fraser Sanitation District Fraser, Colorado Financial Statements December 31, 2007 Fraser Sanitation District Financial Report December 31, 2007 Table of Contents Page INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT Al Management's Discussion and Analysis B1 B4 Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets C1 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets C2 Statement of Cash Flows C3 Statement of Revenues and Expenditures Budget (Non -GAAP) and Actual With Reconciliation to GAAP Basis General Fund C4 Notes to the Financial Statements D1 D1 1 Required Supplementary Information: Statement of Revenues and Expenditures Budget (Non -GAAP) and Actual With Reconciliation to GAAP Basis General Fund El Supplementary Information: Statement of Revenues and Expenditures Budget and Actual JFOC Operations Fund F1 MCMAHAN AND ASSOCIATES, L. L.C. Certified Public Accountants and Consultants SUITE 222 /AVON CENTER 100 WEST BEAVER CREEK BLVD. P.O. Box 5850 AVON, CO 81620 Board of Directors Fraser Sanitation District Fraser, Colorado We have audited the accompanying basic financial statements of Fraser Sanitation District, (the "District as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the District. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fraser Sanitation District as of December 31, 2007, and the changes in its financial position and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Management Discussion and Analysis on pages B1 through B4 and budgetary information on Section E is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Fraser Sanitation District's basic financial statements. The budget actual for the JFOC Operating Fund found in Section E are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the financial statements of the Fraser Sanitation District. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Digitally signed by Paul 2. Backes, C.P.A. DN: cn =Paul 2. Backes, C.P.A4, a= McMahan and Associates, LLC, ou= McMahan and Associates, LLC. email=pbackesmmcrnahancpa.com, c =US Date. 2008.07.07 1331,22 06'00' McMahan and Associates, L.L.C. March 24, 2008 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT WEB SITE: WWW.MCMAHANCPA.COM TELEPHONE: (970) 845-8800 FACSIMILE: (970) 845 -0851 E MCMAHAN @MCMAHANCPA. COM Performing services for local governments throughout Colorado D. Jerry McMahan, C.P.A. Daniel R. Cudahy, C.P.A. Paul J. Backes, C.P.A. Michael N. Jenkins, C.A., C.P.A. Members: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants/Colorado Societ of Certified Public Accountants National and Colorado Government Finance Officers Association /Colorado Municipal League Al MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Fraser Sanitation District Management's Discussion and Analysis December 31, 2007 We, the financial managers of the Fraser Sanitation District (the "District offer readers of the District's financial statements this narrative summary of the financial activities of the District for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Financial Highlights The District has established an operations and maintenance reserve to provide working capital for the Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Treatment Joint Facilities as governed by the Joint Facilities Oversight Committee "JFOC All interest earnings on these working capital balances were allocated the participating entities. The reserve had the following balances at December 31, 2007: Total Deposit Winter Park Ranch Fraser Sanitation District Grand County #1 Interest Additional Interest Interest Original Earnings thru Deposit Earnings thru Balance Earnings thru Balance Deposit 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 133,788 8,492 15,767 32,975 191,022 53,667 244,689 34,785 2,208 4,525 8,574 50,091 13,953 64,045 32,109 2,038 3,737 7,914 45,798 12,880 58,678 66,894 4,246 7,505 16,488 95,133 26,834 121,966 133,788 8,492 15,767 32,975 191,022 53,667 244,689 The District's General Fund had net income $567,792. The JFOC fund had no net income or loss as the full amount of operations was recovered through billings to the participating partners. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the District's basic financial statements. The District's basic financial statements are comprised of two components: 1) financial statements; and 2) notes to the financial statements. These components are discussed below. Financial statements: The financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the District's finances, in a manner similar to a private- sector business. The Statement of Net Assets presents information on all the District's assets and liabilities (both short term and long- term), with the difference between the two reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in net assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the District is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets shows how the government's net assets changed during the years presented. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave.) The Statement of Cash Flows shows the District's sources of cash inflows and outflows during the years presented. Cash flows are categorized among operating, non capital financing, capital and related financing and investing activities, and unlike items reported in the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets, these amounts are reported on the cash basis of accounting. B1 The Statement of Revenues and Expenditures Budget (Non -GAAP Basis) and Actual with Reconciliation to GAAP Basis provides a detailed comparison of the District's actual revenues and expenditures to budgeted amounts. As the District's budget was adopted in a manner that is not consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles "GAAP this statement is presented on a non -GAAP basis with reconciliation to GAAP basis. The business -type activity of the District relates to sanitation services. There are currently no governmental -type activities occurring at the District. The District's financial statements can be found on pages C1 through C3 of this report. Proprietary funds: The District maintains a proprietary fund commonly known as an enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are used to report business -type activities. The District uses enterprise funds to account for its sanitation services. Notes to the Financial Statements: The notes provide a background of the entity, certain required statutes, and accounting policies utilized by the District. They also provide additional information that will aide in the interpretation of the financial statements. The Notes to the Financial Statements can be found on pages D1 through D11 of this report. Financial Analysis of the District The following chart shows the District's assets, liabilities, and net assets for 2007 and 2006: Fraser Sanitation District's Net Assets 2007 2006 Assets: Current and other assets 5,266,018 4,298,686 Capital assets 9,022,731 9,020,797 Total Assets 14,288,749 13,319,483 Liabilities: Other liabilities 1,728,583 1,205,940 Long -term liabilities 1,750,795 1,871,962 Total Liabilities 3,479,378 3,077,902 Net Assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 7,181,202 7,067,997 Unrestricted 3,628,172 3,173,585 Total Net Assets 10,809,374 10,241,582 In 2007, the District's net assets increased primarily due to the contribution of infrastructure assets contributed by Cornerstone. Current and other assets increased due to additional cash held on deposit for JFOC operating and capital expenditures. The District's liabilities remained largely consistent, with an increase in deposits held for operating and capital expenditures on the JFOC plant. The District has outstanding debt on the Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority loan (discussed in page D7 D8 of the Notes to the Financial Statements). At the end of the 2007 and 2006 fiscal years, the District is able to report positive balances in all categories of net assets. Overall, the District's net assets increased $567,792 from the prior year. This increase can be attributed to the infusion of resources from tap fees, increased demand for sanitation services within the District, and the contribution of assets from Cornerstone. B2 Financial Analysis of the District (continued) The following chart is a summary of information relating to the District's Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets: Fraser Sanitation District's Change in Net Assets 2007 2006 Revenues: Tap fees Expenses: Administration Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services Charges for operations /maintenance Charges for professional services Joint facilities management fee General revenues: Property taxes Specific ownership taxes Investment income Miscellaneous revenues Grants and contributions Tap fees Total Revenues Expenses: Operating expenses Deposits held for JFOC Depreciation and amortization Interest expense Total Expenses Change in Net Assets Net Assets Beginning Net Assets Ending Final Budget 403,195 263,640 Actual 204,310 B3 373,838 287,106 89,022 28,422 130,070 9,324 161,032 6,247 312,405 412,295 1,809,761 792,709 86,400 310,473 52,388 1,241,970 351,181 263,030 80,852 28,420 117,028 8,658 132,203 1,628 551,090 1,534,090 628,539 89,417 313,710 54,900 1,086,566 567,791 447,524 10,241,582 9,794,058 10,809,373 10,241,582 As mentioned earlier, the increase in net assets is partially attributable to the contribution of infrastructure assets by Cornerstone. Other changes were consistent with the prior year. Budget Variances in the Enterprise Fund The District was not required to amend the budget for the 2007 fiscal year; the expenses of the District's enterprise fund did not exceed the fund budget. Significant budget variances were as follows: Final Budget Variance Positive (Negative) 412,295 9,100 Additional Taps 59,330 Reason Salaries legal under amended budget Capital Asset and Debt Administration Capital assets: The District's investment in capital assets, net of reimbursements from other districts and excluding accumulated depreciation increased due to the contribution of assets by Cornerstone. Additional information as well as a detailed classification of the District's net capital assets can be found in the Notes to the Financial Statements on page D7. Long -term debts: The District has one long -term debt in the form of a loan obligation. The balance owed at year end was $1,825,000. Additional information can be found in the Notes to the Financial Statements on page D8 of this report. Next Year's Budget and Rates The District's net assets at the end of the current fiscal year were $10,809,374. Of this amount $3,628,172 was unrestricted. The District's 2008 budget anticipates using $35,212 of this balance. Request for Information This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the District's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional information should be addressed to: Fraser Sanitation District, P.O. Box 89, Fraser, CO 80442. B4 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fraser Sanitation District Statement of Net Assets December 31, 2007 and 2006 2007 General JFOC Fund Operations Total 2006 Assets: Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted 3,570,941 1,284,405 4,855,346 3,999,327 Accounts receivable, net: 133,510 37,776 171,286 158,622 Internal balances (9,101) 9,101 Property taxes receivable 226,716 226,716 129,964 Prepaid items 12,670 12,670 10,773 Total Current Assets 3,934,736 1,331,282 5,266,018 4,298,686 Non current Assets: Loan issuance costs, net 16,529 16,529 17,800 Capital assets 10,776,817 10,776,817 10,464,412 Less: accumulated depreciation (1,770,615) (1,770,615) (1,461,415) Total Non current Assets 9,022,731 9,022,731 9,020,797 Total Assets 12,957,467 1,331,282 14,288,749 13,319,483 Liabilities: Current Liabilities: Accounts payable 26,744 13,388 40,132 19,977 Accrued payroll 1,546 1,546 2,367 Accrued compensated absences 3,435 3,435 7,467 Deferred property taxes 226,716 226,716 129,964 Deposits 1,317,894 1,317,894 911,382 Accrued interest 23,860 23,860 24,783 Loan payable 115,000 115,000 110,000 Total Current Liabilities 397,301 1,331,282 1,728,583 1,205,940 Non Current Liabilities: Premium on loan payable 40,795 40,795 46,962 Loan payable 1,710,000 1,710,000 1,825,000 Total Non Current Liabilities 1,750,795 1,750,795 1,871,962 Total Liabilities 2,148,096 1,331,282 3,479,378 3,077,902 Net Assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 7,181,202 7,181,202 7,067,997 Unrestricted 3,628,172 3,628,172 3,173,585 Total Net Assets 10,809,374 10,809,374 10,241,582 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C1 Fraser Sanitation District Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 (With Comparative Amounts for 2006) 2007 General JFOC Fund Operations Total 2006 Operating Revenues: Charges for services 373,838 373,838 351,181 Charges for operations and maintenance costs 76,802 210,304 287,106 263,030 Charges for professional services reimbursement 89,022 89,022 80,852 Joint facilities management fee 28,422 28,422 28,420 Miscellaneous 6,247 6,247 1,628 Total Operating Revenues 574,331 210,304 784,635 725,111 Operating Expenses: Salaries and Wages 172,373 172,373 186,722 Employee Benefits 38,137 38,137 34,010 Purchased services 299,848 103,893 403,741 263,460 Supplies 2,753 65,300 68,053 18,203 Utilities 1,646 108,759 110,405 126,144 Depreciation amortization 310,473 310,473 313,710 Total Operating Expenses 825,230 277,952 1,103,182 942,249 Operating Income (Loss) (250,899) (67,648) (318,547) (217,138) Non Operating Revenues (Expenses): Investment income 161,032 Property taxes 130,070 Specific ownership taxes 9,324 Interest expense (52,388) Deposits held for JFOC (86,400) Transfer in Transfer (out) (67,648) Total Non Operating Revenues (Expenses) 93,990 Income (Loss) Before Capital Contributions (156,909) 67,648 67,648 Capital Contributions: Tap fees 412,295 412,295 551,090 Developer assets 312,405 312,405 Change in Net Assets 567,791 567,791 447,524 Net Assets Beginning 10,241,582 10,241,582 9,794,058 Net Assets Ending 10,809,373 10,809,373 10,241,582 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C2 161,032 132,203 130,070 117,028 9,324 8,658 (52,388) (54,900) (86,400) (89,417) 67,648 58,830 (67,648) (58,830) 161,638 113,572 (156,909) (103,566) Fraser Sanitation District Statement of Cash Flows For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 (With Comparative Amounts for 2006) Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Cash received from customers 563,448 202,274 765,722 753,625 Cash received from customers other sources 6,247 6,247 1,628 Cash payments for goods and services (281,961) (281,980) (563,941) (410,935) Cash payments to employees and for benefits (215,363) (215,363) (222,241) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 72,371 (79,706) (7,335) 122,077 Cash Flows From Capital and Related Financing Activities: Cash received from tap fees 412,295 Cash received from capital acquisition reimbursements Cash paid (received) for deposits (86,400) Loan principal paid (110,000) Loan interest paid (59,478) Net Cash (Used) by Capital and Related Financing Activities 156,417 Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Interest income received Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities Cash Flows From Non Capital Financing Activities: Cash transferred (to) from other funds (65,744) 65,744 Cash received from property and specific ownership taxes 139,394 139,394 125,686 Net Cash Provided by Non Capital Financing Activities 73,650 65,744 139,394 125,686 Non -Cash Investing Activities: Interest credits earned (used) on Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority loan to reduce future principal payments 2007 General JFOC Fund Operations Total 2006 161,032 161,032 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 72,371 406,512 406,512 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 03 412,295 551,090 (19,004) 320,112 319,846 (110,000) (110,000) (59,478) (62,791) 562,929 679,141 161,032 161,032 132,203 132,203 Net (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 463,470 392,550 856,020 1,059,107 Cash and Cash Equivalents Beginning 3,107,471 891,856 3,999,327 2,940,220 Cash and Cash Equivalents Ending 3,570,941 1,284,406 4,855,347 3,999,327 Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: Operating income (loss) (250,899) (67,648) (318,547) (217,138) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 310,473 310,473 313,710 (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (4,634) (8,030) (12,664) 30,144 (Increase) decrease in prepaid items (1,897) (1,897) (158) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 24,181 (4,028) 20,153 (2,972) Increase (decrease) in accrued compensated absences (4,032) (4,032) (1,782) Increase (decrease) in wages payable (821) (821) 273 Total Adjustments 323,270 (12,058) 311,212 339,215 (79,706) (7,335) 122,077 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A. Reporting Entity B. Accounting Policies Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Fraser Sanitation District (the "District was formed under Colorado statutes as a special district, comprising a section of eastern Grand County, Colorado, to provide sanitation services within its boundaries. Five elected board members govern the District. The District's financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles "GAAP The Governmental Accounting Standards Board "GASB is responsible for establishing GAAP for state and local governments through its pronouncements (Statements and Interpretations). Governments are also required to follow the pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board "FASB issued through November 30, 1989, when applicable, that do not conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements. Although the District has the option to apply FASB pronouncements after that date to its enterprise fund, the District has chosen not to do so. The more significant accounting policies established by GAAP used by the District are discussed below. The reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government; i.e., the District, and (b) organizations for which the District is financially accountable. The District is considered financially accountable for legally separate organizations if it is able to appoint a voting majority of an organization's governing body and is either able to impose its will on that organization or there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits to, or to impose specific financial burdens on, the District. Consideration is also given to other organizations, which are fiscally dependent; i.e., unable to adopt a budget, levy taxes, or issue debt without approval by the District. Organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the District are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete are also included in the reporting entity. Based on the criteria above, the District is not financially accountable for any other entity nor is the District a component unit of any other government. The District uses funds to report on its financial position and the results of its operations. Fund accounting is designed to demonstrate legal compliance and to aid financial management by segregating transactions related to certain government functions and activities. A fund is a separate accounting entity with a self balancing set of accounts. The District uses a proprietary fund -type, an enterprise fund, to account for its sole activity, providing sewage disposal services to taxpayers within the District's boundaries. Enterprise funds are used to account for operations (a) which are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods and services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and /or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other purposes. D1 Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation Measurement focus refers to whether financial statements measure changes in current resources only (current financial focus) or changes in both current and long -term resources (long -term economic focus). Basis of accounting refers to the point at which revenues, expenditures, or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Financial statement presentation refers to classification of revenues by source and expenses by function. 1. Long -term Economic Focus and Accrual Basis Proprietary funds use the long -term economic focus and are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. 2. Financial Statement Presentation Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the District's enterprise fund are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for the enterprise fund include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. D. Financial Statement Accounts 1. Cash and Cash Equivalents All short-term investments that are considered highly liquid are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, and at the day of purchase, they have a maturity date no longer than three months. 2. Investments Investments are stated at fair market value. 3. Receivables Receivables are reported net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. However, no allowance for uncollectible accounts has been established, as the District considers all accounts to be collectible. 4. Property Taxes Property taxes are assessed in one year as a lien on the property, but not collected by governmental units until the subsequent year. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the assessed but uncollected property taxes have been recorded as a receivable and as deferred revenue. D2 Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) D. Financial Statement Accounts (continued) 5. Prepaid Expenses Prepaid expenses are amounts paid in the current year for expenses related to subsequent years. Loan Issuance Costs Issuance costs for the loan payable are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan using the straight -line method. Unamortized loan issuance costs at December 31, 2007 and 2006, were $16,529 and $17,800, respectively. 7. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include land, sewer collection systems and related improvements and equipment, are reported in the financial statements. The District defines capital assets as assets with an initial cost of $5,000 or more and an estimated useful life in excess of two years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair value at the date of donation. Capital outlay for projects is capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase is capitalized as part of the value of the assets constructed. Sewer collection systems and improvements and equipment are depreciated using the straight -line method over the following estimated useful lives: 8. Deposits Assets Years Sewer collection system and improvements existing system 30 Equipment 3 -10 Sewer collection system new combined system 80 Sewer plant 40 Deposits represent contributions made to the District by Winter Park Ranch Water and Sanitation District "Winter Park Ranch and Grand County Water and Sanitation District #1 "Grand County #1 and the District for operating and replacement costs relating to the combined wastewater treatment plant. These deposits will held for working capital and replacement costs for the time all District's remain joint operators of the plant D3 I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) D. Financial Statement Accounts (continued) 9. Premium on Loan Payable The premium on the loan payable is deferred and amortized over the life of the loan using the amount of principal outstanding methodology. The unamortized loan premium at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $40,795 and $46,962, respectively. 10. Compensated Absences A. Budgetary Information Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) Earned but unused vacation benefits are accrued when incurred in the financial statements. II. Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability In the fall of each year, the District's Board of Directors formally adopts a budget with appropriations by fund for the ensuing year pursuant to the Colorado Local Budget Law. The proprietary fund was adopted on a non -GAAP budgetary basis and has been reconciled to a GAAP basis in the financial statements. Annual appropriations are adopted for all funds. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations at the fund level and all appropriations lapse at year -end. As required by Colorado statutes, the District followed the required timetable noted below in preparing, approving, and enacting its budget for 2007. 1. For the 2007 budget year, prior to August 25, 2006, the County Assessor sent to the District an assessed valuation of all taxable property within the District's boundaries. The County Assessor may change the assessed valuation on or before December 10 only once by a single notification to the District. 2. The Manager of the District submitted, on or before October 15, 2006, a recommended budget that detailed the necessary property taxes needed along with other available revenues to meet the District's operating requirements. 3. Prior to December 15, 2006, after a required publication of "Notice of Proposed Budget" and a public hearing, the District certified to the County Commissioners a levy rate that derived the necessary property taxes as computed in the proposed budget, and the District adopted the proposed budget and an appropriating resolution that legally appropriated expenditures for the upcoming year. 4. After adoption of the budget resolution, the District may make the following changes: a) approve supplemental appropriations to the extent of revenues in excess of estimated revenues in the budget; however, no supplemental appropriations were made during 2007; b) approve emergency appropriations; and c) reduce appropriations for which originally estimated revenues are insufficient. D4 Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) II. Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability (continued) A. Budgetary Information (continued) Taxes levied in one year are collected in the succeeding year. Thus, taxes certified in 2006 were collected in 2007 and taxes certified in 2007 will be collected in 2008. Taxes are due on January 1st in the year of collection; however, they may be paid in either one installment (no later than April 30th) or two equal installments (not later than February 28th and June 15th) without interest or penalty. Taxes that are not paid within the prescribed time bear interest at the rate of one percent (1 per month until paid. Unpaid amounts and the accrued interest thereon become delinquent on June 16th. B. TABOR Amendment In November 1992, Colorado voters amended Article X of the Colorado Constitution by adding Section 20; commonly know as the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights "TABOR TABOR contains revenue, spending, tax and debt limitations that apply to the State of Colorado and local governments. TABOR requires, with certain exceptions, advance voter approval for any new tax, tax rate increase, mill levy above that for the prior year, extension of any expiring tax, or tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any local government. Except for refinancing bonded debt at a lower interest rate or adding new employees to existing pension plans, TABOR requires advance voter approval for the creation of any multiple fiscal year debt or other financial obligation unless adequate present cash reserves are pledged irrevocably and held for payments in all future fiscal years. The District's voters approved the following Tabor ballot question on November 4, 1997: Provided that no local tax rate or mill levy shall be increased without separate voter approval, shall Fraser Sanitation District be authorized to maintain its current tax rates and mill levies and collect, retain and spend all revenues, including taxes and any other funds, collected in fiscal year 1997 and every fiscal year thereafter, with such revenues to be collected, retained and spent as a voter approved revenue change and an exception to any revenue or spending limit or any requirement of tax or tax rate reduction in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, Section 29 -1 -301, Colorado Revised Statutes, or any other provision of law? Accordingly, the District's management believes that it is in compliance with the financial provisions of TABOR. However, TABOR is complex and subject to interpretation. Many of its provisions, including the interpretation of how to calculate fiscal year spending limits, will require judicial interpretation. III. Detailed Notes on All Funds A. Deposits and Investments The District's deposits are entirely covered by federal depository insurance "FDIC or by collateral held under Colorado's Public Deposit Protection Act "PDPA The FDIC insures the first $100,000 of the District's deposits at each financial institution. Deposit balances over $100,000 are collateralized as required by PDPA. As of year end, the carrying amount of the District's demand deposits was $121,040. At year end, the District had the following investments and maturities: D5 111. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) A. Deposits and Investments Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) Standard Poors Less than Less than Rating Balance one year five years Deposits: Checking Not Rated 121,040 121,040 Investments: Pools AAAm 4,734,306 4,734,306 Total 4,855,346 The Investment Pool represents investments in COLOTRUST which is a 2a7 -like pool. The fair value of the pool is determined by the pool's share price. The District has no regulatory oversight for the pool. The District has invested $4,734,306 in Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust "COLOTRUST an investment vehicle established for local government entities in Colorado to pool surplus funds. COLOTRUST operates similarly to a money market fund and each share is equal in value to $1.00. Investments of COLOTRUST consist of U.S. Treasury bills, notes and note strips and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. A designated custodial bank provides safekeeping and depository services to COLOTRUST in connection with the direct investment and withdrawal functions of COLOTRUST. Substantially all securities owned by COLOTRUST are held by the Federal Reserve Bank in the account maintained for the custodial bank. Interest Rate Risk. As a means of limiting its exposure to interest rate risk, the District diversifies its investments by security type and institution, and limits holdings in any one type of investment with any one issuer. The District coordinates its investment maturities to closely match cash flow needs and restricts the maximum investment term to less than five years from the purchase date. As a result of the limited length of maturities the District has limited its interest rate risk. Credit Risk. State law and District policy limit investments to those authorized by State statutes including U.S. Agencies and 2a7 -like pools. The District's general investment policy is to apply the prudent person rule: Investments are made as a prudent person would be expected to act, with discretion and intelligence, to seek reasonable income, preserve capital, and, in general, avoid speculative investments. Financial institutions holding District deposits are required to be an eligible public depository under the requirements of Colorado's Public Deposit Protection Act. The Colorado Public Deposit Protection Act "PDPA requires that all units of local government deposit cash in eligible public depositories; eligibility is determined by State regulators. Amounts on deposit in excess of Federal insurance levels must be collateralized. The eligible collateral is determined by the PDPA. The PDPA allows the institution to create a single collateral pool for all public funds. The pool is to be maintained by another institution or held in trust for all the uninsured public deposits as a group. The market value of the collateral must be at least equal to the aggregate uninsured deposits. D6 III. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) A. Deposits and Investments Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) Concentration of Credit Risk. The District diversifies its investments by security type and institution. Investments may only be made in those financial institutions which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Home Mortgage Association, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Congressionally authorized mortgage lenders and investments that are federally guaranteed. B. Capital Assets Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2007 was as follows: Beginning Balance Additions Disposals Subtotal Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land 144,320 144,320 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 144,320 144,320 Capital assets, being depreciated: Sewer treatment plant 9,073,937 9,073,937 Sewer collection system and improvements Existing system 7,324,194 312,404 7,636,598 Equipment 71,492 71,493 Sewer collection system New combined system 740,609 740,609 Total capital assets being depreciated 17,210,232 312,404 17,522,637 Less: Contributions from others (6,890,140) (6,890,140) Total net capital assets, being depreciated 10,320,092 312,404 10,632,497 Less accumulated depreciation for: Sewer treatment plant (238,460) (78,487) (316,947) Sewer collection system Existing (1,145,860) (223,304) (1,369,164) Equipment (56,166) (3,922) (60,088) Sewer collection system New (20,928) (3,488) (24,416) Total accumulated depreciation (1,461,414) (309,201) (1,770,615) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 8,858,678 312,404 (309,201) 8,861,882 Total capital assets, net 9,002,998 312,404 (309,201) 9,006,202 The above referenced "Contributions from Others" column is explained in the Intergovernmental Agreements section of these financial statements. E. Liabilities 1. Loans Payable On May 8, 2001, the District entered a $2,445,000 loan agreement with the Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority "CWRPDA the proceeds of which were utilized to construct a new wastewater treatment facility. D7 III. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) E. Liabilities (continued) 1. Loans Payable (continued) Starting in 2002, principal on the loan is due February 1 and August 1 through August 2020, at a stated interest rate of 3.99 The District is to receive a credit against each of its semi annual interest payments for the amount of capitalized interest and investment income available to be applied, as set forth in the agreement. In addition to paying interest on the outstanding principal, the District is required to make administrative fee payments to CWPRDA, ranging from $3,668 to $9,780, on February 1 and August 1 through August 2020. Interest and administrative fees due and paid on the CWPRDA loan totaled $71,948 for 2007. The loan agreement contains various restrictive covenants and requirements, including the maintenance of a three -month operating and maintenance reserve, not to exceed $1,250,000. If the operations and maintenance reserve falls below this requirement, the shortfall must be made up in 24 substantially equal monthly installments beginning the second month after such shortfall or the date of delivery. Long -term debt activity for the year ended December 31, 2007 was as follows: CWRPDA Loan 1,935,000 Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) 1/1/07 12/31/07 Due Within Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year D8 (110,000) Debt service requirements at December 31, 2007 were as follows: 1,825,000 115,000 Administrative Total Year Principal Fee Interest Debt Service 2008 115,000 19,560 57,265 191,825 2009 115,000 19,560 54,663 189,223 2010 120,000 19,560 50,624 190,184 2011 125,000 19,560 46,409 190,969 2012 130,000 19,560 37,331 186,891 2013 -2017 710,000 97,800 127,445 935,245 2018 -2020 510,000 41,565 19,717 571,282 1,825,000 237,165 393,453 2,455,618 IV. Other Information A. Risk Management B. Retirement Plan Section 401(a) C. Joint Ventures Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) III. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) E. Liabilities (continued) 2. Accrued Compensated Absences Earned but unused vacation benefits amounted to $3,435 and $7,467 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The District is exposed to various risks of loss related to workers compensation; general liability, unemployment, torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; and errors and omissions. The District has acquired commercial coverage for these risks and claims, if any, are not expected to exceed the commercial insurance coverage. In 2002, the District established a defined contribution money purchase plan in the form of the Colorado County Officials and Employees Retirement Association Money Purchase Plan and Trust under Code Section 401 of the Internal Revenue code. In addition to Social Security, the District matches a four percent (4 payroll deduction. Only full -time employees who have been with the District for twelve consecutive months are eligible. The District's total and covered payroll for 2007 was $172,373 and $136,450 respectively. Contributions for 2007 were $10,916, which consisted of $5,458 from the employees and $5,458 allocated to the employees paid by the District. 1. Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Agreement In 2002, the District, Winter Park Ranch, and Grand County #1 entered into an agreement to participate in the joint construction, maintenance, and operation of joint interceptor sewer lines and joint sewage treatment facilities. This new wastewater treatment plant has been constructed on the existing plant site of the District/Winter Park Ranch treatment facility and a new and /or expanded sewer trunk line from Grand County #1 will connect with the existing District/Winter Park Ranch interceptor line. Title of the new joint facilities will be allocated among these three districts based on each district's proportionate share of equivalent residential units to be serviced by the new plant. D9 Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) III. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) C. Joint Ventures 1. Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Agreement (continued) Construction costs of these new facilities, excluding expenses relating to segment B of the joint trunk lines "B- Line described below, are based on each district's future share of equivalent residential units to be serviced by the new plant and are allocated as follows: District 34.07% Winter Park Ranch 28.89% Grand County #1 37.04% Under the Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Agreement, a Joint Facilities Oversight Committee "JFOC was established to represent the three districts regarding the construction, expansion, operations, management, and maintenance of the new joint facilities. The JFOC is comprised of a total of nine members, with each district having three members. The District has been appointed as the initial manager of the new joint facilities. The JFOC may designate a new manager on an annual basis. In 2007, as approved by the JFOC, the District earned $28,422 in management fees. Operations and maintenance costs will be allocated among the three districts based on each district's proportionate share of equivalent residential units to be serviced by the new plant. In addition, upon certification of the new joint facilities, this agreement requires the establishment of an operations and maintenance reserve fund equal to three months' operations and maintenance costs and a capital replacement reserve fund, the amount which will be determined by the JFOC. 2. Pre Inclusion Agreement Rendezvous The District entered an agreement on May 9, 2000, with Maryvale Village, L.L.C., and several individuals (collectively referred to as the "Rendezvous Maryvale Commercial Metropolitan District, and Maryvale Residential Metropolitan District (these districts are collectively referred to as the "Maryvale Districts that permitted the inclusion of the Maryvale development within the District's boundaries in order to receive sanitation services, in exchange for inclusion fees. Pursuant to this agreement, Rendezvous and the Maryvale Districts are responsible for the construction of sewer main extensions and related infrastructure from the existing District sewer main to the Maryvale development. These sewer main extensions and related infrastructure will ultimately be conveyed to the District at the time these projects are completed or begin to be used, whichever comes first, subject to the District's acceptance of these assets. As of December 31, 2007, the Maryvale development sewer mains and infrastructure had been conveyed to the District. Accordingly, these assets have are included on the District's financial statements. D10 Fraser Sanitation District Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2007 (Continued) III. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) C. Joint Ventures 2. Pre Inclusion Agreement Rendezvous (continued) Per this agreement, in exchange for the District agreeing to oversize the new wastewater treatment plant described earlier, the Developer and Maryvale Districts agreed to cover the amount of any shortfall in the District's CWRPDA loan payments by pre purchasing tap fees. In addition, this agreement requires the Developer and Maryvale Districts to establish an escrow account in the amount of $160,000 to guarantee their compliance in the event of a default regarding their pre purchase obligations. As of December 31, 2007, no prepaid tap fees have been required or made by the Developer and the Maryvale Districts. 3. Pre Inclusion Agreement Cornerstone The District entered an agreement on April 5, 2005, with Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, L.L.C. "Cornerstone that permits the inclusion of the a portion of Cornerstone's development within the District's boundaries in order to receive sanitation services for inclusion fees. Cornerstone shall be responsible for constructing, paying for and installing all sewer lines and any related facilities within the property including all lines, manholes and mains. This infrastructure will ultimately be conveyed to the District at the time these projects are completed or begin to be used, whichever comes first, subject to the District's acceptance of these assets. D11 Fraser Sanitation District General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenses Budget (Non -GAAP) and Actual with Reconciliation to GAAP Basis For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 2007 2006 Final Budget Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Charges for services 351,162 372,520 373,838 1,318 351,181 Charges for salaries 79,591 79,591 76,802 (2,789) 75,507 Charges for professional services reimbursement 45,000 80,000 89,022 9,022 80,852 Joint facilities management fee 28,420 28,420 28,422 2 28,420 Tap fees 325,000 403,195 412,295 9,100 551,090 Investment income 65,000 166,000 161,032 (4,968) 132,203 Property taxes 129,964 128,900 130,070 1,170 117,028 Specific ownership taxes 7,700 8,500 9,324 824 8,658 Miscellaneous 1,500 2,518 6,247 3,729 1,628 Total Revenues 1,033,337 1,269,644 1,287,052 17,408 1,346,567 Expenses: Board of directors 13,400 12,400 10,915 1,485 9,431 Administration 155,850 263,640 204,310 59,330 127,308 Collection system 183,175 210,103 196,509 13,594 160,777 Plant salaries 104,725 110,870 103,023 7,847 103,674 Interest expense 59,478 59,478 52,388 7,090 54,900 Principal payments on debt 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Deposits held for JFOC 86,400 86,400 86,400 89,417 Capital outlay Transfer out 128,516 87,404 67,647 19,757 58,830 Total Expenses 841,544 940,295 831,192 109,103 714,337 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over Expenditures 191,793 329,349 455,860 126,511 632,230 Reconciliation to GAAP Basis: Depreciation and amortization expense (310,473) (313,710) Principal payments on debt 110,000 110,000 Capitalized assets 19,005 Capital contribution 312,405 Net Income GAAP Basis 567,792 447,525 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. El Fraser Sanitation District JFOC Operations Statement of Revenues Expenses Budget and Actual For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 (With Comparative Amounts for 2006) 2007 2006 Final Budget Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: JFOC operating charges 535,500 355,300 277,952 (77,348) 187,523 Interest revenue 10,600 54,765 (54,765) Transfer -In 58,830 Total Revenues 546,100 410,065 277,952 (132,113) 246,353 Expenses: Training programs 2,000 500 78 422 295 Travel, meals and lodging 2,000 582 582 480 Meals and entertainment 200 100 100 Professional fees 18,000 8,500 6,440 2,060 4,922 Engineering fees 10,000 8,922 8,922 2,049 Financial services 100 33 33 3,090 Sludge removal 27,000 27,000 26,830 170 20,300 Other professional services 2,500 500 500 Insurance 25,000 25,000 20,897 4,103 21,564 Advertising 100 100 27 73 54 Plant maintenance repair 20,000 20,000 6,695 13,305 15,518 Grounds maintenance 2,000 2,000 454 1,546 481 Equipment rental 1,000 1,000 1,000 Professional memberships 200 200 200 69 Operating supplies 17,500 70,000 65,300 4,700 14,443 Equipment purchase and repair 17,000 5,000 3,740 1,260 5,362 Testing 22,000 22,000 19,271 2,729 17,708 Permits 7,500 7,500 6,090 1,410 4,351 Utilities 146,900 142,900 108,759 34,141 124,340 Vehicles 3,500 3,500 3,834 (334) 2,714 Miscellaneous 1,000 1,000 1,000 351 Capital projects 200,000 10,000 10,000 8,262 Contingency 10,000 2,000 2,000 Total Expenses 535,500 358,337 277,952 80,385 246,353 Change in Net Assets 10,600 51,728 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F1 (51,728) N w 0 w m 0 (D iD 0. 3 O 0 3 0 3 N 0 a r m m z -I c m N O N 03 01 0o -4 03 CO O 0) 0) O 0) O CO O 03 01 N (L) CO O 0) co O O 01 CO V 03 0) A on E DJ W CD m J 0)' 01 O; N 0) 0 0 0n 0) co O W O N 03 0) N O N 0) N N c 0 sv 0 V 01 00 0) 01 011 00 01 CO 0) 0 CO W V CO 01 CO CO 0) 0) ti CO 11 8 77 3 7 (0 (D —1 (D: X m m 3 (D A N N' 01 A 01 0)' V O O 0) N.) 0 0 0 O O 0) V CO 0);;03 N A 0) 1 Oo N W A 00 0 W' 0) N co 0�1 N V N,. O) 0) (0 0). N O) O 0) 0000 0) 01 0 0 CO V 011 v N W CO N W N 0) 0) 0 0 N 01 O O 0) W 00 V O N 011 V O O 0 0 CO 0) O O is 0) 0) N O N O N N W N 0- 0 0 0n W 01 011 O O N V V O (31 V CO 01 O O 01 O O W 00 O i O 03 N N 01 N CO W W (1 0) (O O 0) 7o000K <ccccc17- 1mQOcm0 wwmr >WD —I 27 27 a n 774. 74. 74' P-« o N 0 0 SD Q CD N A- Q.= —1 w cQ m N cn v co cn cn y co -0 o a 5. a (D n m m m n m y -0-004j m -0 Z R7 0 CD c D 0 sv 0 a jj m m y. m o m ai m m- c c C w D m m 3 CO cn cQ co sD ,n-. a A) m a) "a "a o 3 0 O (D (1) (D u) N 0) 77 Q. o m 1 0 z m 70 m o CD CD (D No�p�= �c��� �ro m K 3:`� om� (D 90 ...n (T. h2 w (0 ti 0. SD (D SD C 3 o ci 0. 1 O W N 1 1 N N OOI WNI000AV NV V N3001 N3 V 0 01 CO A 00001A0000101OO 01 N0000U1 000 11ON O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.' O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O -i Ul 1 N N W 1 A V W O) CO W W O 0) O rn Co A 0) CO CO V 0) 0) V O N V 0) (O A 0) x) 03 O O 01 0) CO W CO 01 00 01 V (O V A A 0) 011 CO (O CO N A N W O 0) 0 CO 0 0 A 01 0 01 0 CO 0 1 0 (O CO 0 0 A 01 -4 0 0 0 N 0 V 0) 0 0 W N U7 03 V 0n co 01 03 A Ln O O O 0+1 O O O W cn V O N O W O O O O O O 0n O O 0 01 01 CO W N O 0) N N Ln O O O O O O 0 N V O 00 03 O O O O O O 0 v 03 CO 01 01 co O O V 01 O O 01 W 0) O N 0 0 N O O 011 O W 0) CO 1 0) 1 O O 0 V P 0Y1 O O N N (0 0) N O O W O O O 0 O O O O N 011 (0 03 01 V O O 0 1 A. A. 1 V J. N A O :01 (0 V 1 A 0) v A 0) 01 W V O N O N V N A W A O O 0 0 -4 0 01 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 O O 1 1 011 O O O O` O Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O O O O O O O CO O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O N 011 O CO V co OD 0) O 01 W (31 0 0 01 O 0 N N O 0) N O O O O O A O 01 V 0) 0 O W 0 0 N N O 0 O N N O O 0 01 W O N O V O 0 O O O O 00 CO 0) V (0 O 01 01 0 O O O 00 O O 0 0 CO V 0) O W O 0 W N O O V (31 O O V 0n O O 0n O 0 0) co co N 0 0 0 0 O 01 00 O co O O O O O O N -4 N 03 03 A 01 01 N O 0 0 N O 0 0 01 V 0) O W O N 01 O O O O O O O CO 01 N 0 CO 0) O O N O O O N 01 O O O 0) N 01 N O 0 N 01 O O 0) 03 N O 1 0) 0) O 0 O 0 N O O 0 01 N O O O N A A O 0) N V P Co 0 N 0n O O 0 0 O 0 0 CO 03 O N O op 0) O O 01 O O 0 N O 0 O W 01 0) 0 0 O 0 N 0n N co 0 0 O O N 01 N O V W O O O W O 0 O 00 0) W O 01 O O 03 N O O W 0) W c 0 n r z m K '0 m z C7 C m W 0) 0) CO (.0 O W (37 v CO 0) N O (O N N N A (31 01 O 0) 0) N 0 0 W 0) 0) 07 "a (D N 7 CD (D (3 CD o, w CD !v m 0 cn `D 0) 0) 011 CO 0 0 CO N 01 O 0 O N 01 O O O N O O 0) N 01 01 O O 0) 0) 0)) N CO (0 N 01 O 0 N CO W V Co O -4 CO V oo V 0) 03 01 0) 03 0) W CO 0 c 0 0 •0 z m m z c m N N O O 0. co 2 N 0 0 CO W c 0. (Q R. N O O co v c (Q 0 0 0 -n 0 (D N c a m m m 8 CD E \-n o o 0 2 0 I 2 7 0 1.1 AMMONIA REMOVAL Fire Triangle 1.1.1 Background The biological conversion of AMMONIA to NITRATE has four components microorganisms, time for the microorganisms to complete the reaction (detention time), oxygen and alkalinity. For each gram of ammonia (as N) converted, 0.08 g of inorganic carbon is utilized on formation of new cells. This small amount of carbon is available in aeration basins that convert BOD and ammonia at the same time. Aerobic conversion of ammonia to nitrate is shown in the following equation: NH4 +1.830 +1.98 HCO 0.0210 +0.98NO +1.04H +1.88H Nitrifying Organisms Nitrosomonas Nitrobacter Oxygen 4.6 LB 02 PER LB AMMONIA AMMONIA Detention Time 16 HRS MIN Alkalinity 7.14 LB CACO PER LB AMMONIA 1 1.1.2 Nitrifying Organisms Nitrification requires a sufficient biomass of NITRIFYING ORGANISMS to convert or oxidize ammonia (NH -N) to nitrite (NO -N) and oxidize nitrite to nitrate (NO -N). A small population of organisms requires a longer detention time to convert ammonia. A large nitrifying population requires a shorter detention time to convert ammonia. Nitrifying organisms are autotrophic read "picky The nitrifiers will only utilize (consume or eat) nitrogen. And the organisms will only utilize nitrogen when their environment is just to their liking. As the temperature of the mixed liquor decreases, the organism's nitrogen conversion rate (kinetics) slows. Sufficient oxygen and alkalinity has to be available in the mixed liquor or the organisms will not convert nitrogen. Nitrifying organisms are slow growing. A mixed liquor population containing nitrifying organisms will also contain a mixture of bacteria, protozoa, and rotifiers. A common misconception is that the nitrifying organisms can be encouraged to work under less than perfect conditions by providing extra amounts of available components to make up for missing components. An example is providing extra oxygen (air) to make up for lack of alkalinity. Another example is providing extra alkalinity when the environmental condition causing slowed nitrification is low temperature and associated slow conversion kinetics. OBSERVATION: Conduct a microscopic analysis of the mixed liquor. Nitrifying organisms are present in a mature microorganism population. Look for stalked cilitates and few free swimmers. Refer to RTW Troubleshooting Chart for microorganism photographs. PROCESS CONTROL: Increase SLUDGE AGE (decrease sludge wasting) to allow time for the microorganism population to develop. 2 1.1.3 Detention Time Ammonia conversion requires aerobic DETENTION TIME to complete the oxidization process. Aerobic detention time is the time the nitrifiers have a sufficient oxygen supply (DO greater than 0.5 mg/L) to convert ammonia. The blower or mechanical aerator run time can be less than the aerobic detention time. A mixed liquor containing a large population of nitrifying organisms with sufficient supply of oxygen and alkalinity requires 16 hours aerobic detention time in the aeration basin. The aerobic detention time is increased up to 24 hours to allow nitrification to occur when the nitrifying organism population is small, the aeration basin temperature is low, or both conditions occur. OBSERVATION: Measure the influent ammonia concentration and the effluent ammonia concentration. A mature mixed liquor under favorable conditions will convert 30 to 40 mg/L ammonia. PROCESS CONTROL: Refer to oxygen process control discussion in the following section. 3 1.1.4 Oxygen Nitrifying organisms require a minimum of 4.6 Ib OXYGEN per lb of ammonia converted. Additional oxygen is required for the heterotrophic organisms to convert BOD. OBSERVATION: FORMULAS: Measure the mixed liquor (aeration basin) dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Should be 0 mg/L at start of aeration cycle, greater than 1.5 mg/L at midpoint of aeration cycle. PROCESS CONTROL: Adjust aerator run times to provide a minimum of 16 hours of aeration per 24 hour period. When developing a new population of nitrifying organisms, provide 24 hour aeration time. As the population increases, decrease the aeration time. Provide 16 hour aeration time for a stable population. Match oxygen required with number of aerators running: EXAMPLE: Running the aerators at the same time puts approximately 151b oxygen every hour (1 lb 0 per HP per hour). The process requires 0.05 MGD x 300 mg/L BOD x 8.34 lb /gal x 1.5 lb 0 /lb BOD removed 0.05 MGD x 30 mg/L ammonia x 8.341b /gal x 4.6 Ib 0 /lb ammonia removed 245 Ib 0 per day. Calculate aerator run time: 2451b 0 /day 15 Ib O /hr 16.33 hr /day. Flow (MGD) x Ammonia Concentration (mg/L) x 8.341b /gal =1b ammonia removed per day Flow (MGD) x BOD Concentration (mg/L) x 8.341b /gal lb BOD removed per day Oxygen Required lb ammonia x 4.61b oxygen/lb ammonia removed lb BOD x 1.61b oxygen/lb BOD removed Oxygen Provided 1 lb oxygen/HP -hr x HP /aerator x number of aerators x aeration time 4 1.1.5 Alkalinity Nitrifying organisms require a minimum of 7.14 lb ALKALINITY per lb of ammonia converted. OBSERVATION: Measure the mixed liquor's pH. A pH below 6.5 indicates a low alkalinity concentration. Measure the mixed liquor's alkalinity. PROCESS CONTROL Maintain the alkalinity concentration above 70 mg/L as CaCO Alkalinity in excess of the daily demand can be added to the mixed liquor. Extra alkalinity will remain in the mixed liquor and provide buffering when required. Alkalinity can be in the form of: Bicarbonate [HCO pH range 4.5 to 8.3 Carbonate [CO pH range 6.5 to 10 Hydroxide [OH], pH range 8 to 14 Soda ash provides bicarbonate alkalinity. Adding excess bicarbonate does not raise the pH higher than 8.3. Sodium carbonate provides carbonate alkalinity, magnesium hydroxide and lime provide hydroxide alkalinity. Alkalinity chemicals other than soda ash (bicarbonate alkalinity) can be used if the chemical is not added in excess. Balance or match the alkalinity added with the alkalinity required to convert ammonia. Carbonate and hydroxide alkalinity chemicals added in excess can raise the mixed liquor's pH to a level that inhibits the microorganism's ability to convert waste: EXAMPLE: Alkalinity required 0.05 MGD x 30 mg/L ammonia x 8.341b /gal x 7.14 lb alkalinity /lb ammonia removed 901b alkalinity /day. Alkalinity available 0.05 MG /aeration basin x 120 mg/L alkalinity x 8.341b /gal 501b /aeration basin. The process requires an additional 401b alkalinity 90 lb alkalinity /day 501b alkalinity in aeration basin. 5 1.2 NITRATE REMOVAL 1.2.1 Background Nitrate removal or denitrification requires a sufficient biomass of DENITRIFYING ORGANISMS to convert or oxidize nitrate (NO -N) to nitrogen gas (N A small population of organisms requires a longer detention time to convert nitrate. A large population requires a shorter detention time to convert nitrate. Denitrifying organisms are heterotrophic, and are some of the same microorganisms that convert BOD. The denitrifiers utilize (consume or eat) nitrate under anoxic conditions low dissolved oxygen, and utilize BOD under aerobic conditions DO concentrations between 0.5 and 2.0 mg/L. The organisms utilize nitrate under varying conditions, but the rate of conversion is affected. Things slow down when the water temperature gets cold. Denitrification releases oxygen and alkalinity into the mixed liquor. Denitrifying organisms have varying growth rates. A mixed liquor population containing denitrifying organisms contains a mixture of bacteria, protozoa, and rotifiers. In biological nitrogen removal, the electron donor is typically one of three sources: biologically degradable soluble COD (bsCOD) from the influent, bsCOD produced during endogenous decay, and an added carbon source as methanol or acetate. When denitrification occurs after BOD has been removed from the wastewater, a carbon source is added to the anoxic tank or phase. Nitrate conversion under anoxic conditions is shown in the following equation: NO +1.08 CH H 0.065C +0.4N +0.76 CO +2.44 H Denitrifying Organisms Oxygen NEARLY ZERO 02 FOR ANOXIC CONDITIONS Carbon Source 4 GM BOD GM NO3 REMOVED NITRATE Detention Time 4 HRS MIN Alkalinity RELEASED BACK TO SYSTEM 3.57 GM ALK/ GM NITRATE CONVERTED 6 TROUBLESHOOTING FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES PARAMETRIC EVALUATION When confronted with an operations problem, a good solution approach is to get input from other operators and engineers. People look at the problem from their perspective, based on their experience, and the group usually can arrive at a good solution in a short period of time. Solution by committee is not always available. Every operator has or will have to solve a problem on their own. It is still a good approach to stop and think about the problem from a couple of angles before taking action. Try to think of at least one more way to confirm your findings. One direction that should always be used in problem solving is common sense. Another direction is experience. The third direction would be sound engineering practices. This solution method is called parametric evaluation. Parametric evaluation means getting the same answer from at least two different directions. It is a method of solving differential equations, and the only thing I retained from that class. Not how to solve differential equations, just the phrase. KEEP IT SIMPLE SHERRI K.I.S.S. is a problem solving method I learned in high school algebra: Keep It Simple, Stupid. Probably would have to change the last word to "student" in today's politically correct world, but I went to high school a long time ago. The corollary to KISS is, "Check the Simple Stuff'. When conducting the first steps of troubleshooting a problem, check the simple stuff. Kenmore used to include a pamphlet with a new washer titled, "Before You Call the Repairman The first step was, "Check that the washer is plugged in." Sounds simple now, but what about when the guy is at a pump station at 1 a.m. on Saturday morning and the water level is rising? Steps equivalent to "checking that it is plugged in" include: Check that the PLC is in "RUN not "PROGRAM" Check that the local STOP button is pulled out Check that the local Hand Off Remote is in the correct position (Remote if the equipment is supposed to be controlled by floats, PLC, etc) Check that the remote Hand Off -Auto switch is turned to AUTO Check that motor starter is in the "ON" position, reset if tripped 1 0 69 W co Co W co co A 0 0 a 'D (A O 00 (D 0 SD 03 0 S 3D 0 N 3) 0 N a N N N O A O) O O O 0 0 0 n o MCOW m N A OD J W O O D A W (n A N N .1)-00 0 MOM J W W 0) A A CO O J co T° J 0) GJ W N '4 N (04 (O c m A A ((3) (D (O U) (0 moo J O 0 N W O N 03 3, 4 03 W O) N "co 4o W 0030(3) Q) J A O W J N N A 3 N O A A co A A 0000 O) 00)3 A co (00)00) O 050o- N .Q.,17,-S71 Q O C o y Q co m o m1 0 „m vi Q --1 O (D O c In N N N) 2 m y C 0 -3 1 N n .11 a O a) 0 O N CD Dm C N j =DD Q27 ry OL o mm�a (1,5-2 fD m (n K m c m a cn m a o' o T 3" `G O -I N 1 0 o m D Q 3D 00 m 0m z =I ,,,IM a N m Cn— N N S 0 N D) O m? DI O N CO N (n W N U 5+ D D 5 -P. 1 1 a m (D O_ m S 0 D n j O m a o D m m 3 m -0m0 o 0 9' 3 °0(o m y z° 0 5 T1D (o N 3DD 2 m Tom &D, (D (D m N m D o Le 0 73 T N N 0 0 d D ca N n co 0 N D) o y O 1) T N 0 0 0 W O) O 0 co 0) 0 0 W O GO O 0 0 0 J N O O 0 w 0 (n o A o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 cO p 05 1 3 0 0 0 O) O 0 O CO 0 y co 0 CO W (.)m 03 0) CO N 0 0 0 N 0 0 CO A 03 000 000 W r "Cr, j co v V o n N 000 (3) 1(3 1(3 1(30340 09)(34 (n V W COM W W o 69 W 0) O O 69 0 0 69 W J 0-4(0 N N O O W O (O W mom O) 000 O 6A O O O N O 0 O O. N ro 0 °o N O) 0 m 0 N DI Oyu 0 O a N N 0• m x V N 7 0 N V N 0 N D) 00 0 0 V CD w N O 7 0) p CD 0 co 13 0 0 w w D C 0 (D 7 Q) 0 (0 0 W W N O J A CO 00000 O A J CO 0 0 0 W CA W N 0 O W N A O W (7) O O A CP 0 0 A Ni A w O) W N 0 0 W Ni A O CO (A O 0 A 01 O O A N A J Ni Ni N N (7) A O O O) (n Co O CA W O 0 03 O 0 O 03 A CO W O) W N O W N A O W O o A (T O O A N A O W W W V 0 0 0 N V CP CO O CO CD O A 0) A 01 Ni 0) 01 CO (A J 03 0 0 N (7) O O OO A CO O O O O O O O O O CO CO N V A (0 A (I1 01 N O O) A CO V CO 0) A W C71 0) A C71 A A O (P A O N CP CO V A A OO 0 N O) A C7) 0) C71 CP A A N A N 03 W 03 CO O N N O CO A N N J CO 03 0) N ffl W 0) O O O O ffl w O) O O co O va O O. N N co 0 m x fD r- 0 O. M y (D y W N w O y co O O n (0 v 0. O O. N '0 O O y M D1 m x N 0 V 0) v 0 0) co w V 0 N v a (D O. N 17 r: N 00 w m x CD (0 0) N 0 O O (0 O 73 a O rCO y re. Cu O N O `G w CD 0 0) y N N co co) 0. 3 c CD j 0 O 01 N N 004 0) 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O CO 03 CO O 0 O) CO O O A O) 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 J Co N j CO J O N (A W W O CO cm CD CD N 0 0 0 0 CO.... -1. O) V 03 0 O N 03 0 O CO A CO 0 O O 0 O O O 0 CO O) V 0) 0 O N C7) O O CO A 0) O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O (11 N N A J CO W O O W O) J 'co V 01 A J CO CO A O) W CO N (b A CO W (b O A O 0) J O O s N N N CO W 0m g H O F3 y al 7 w 0 N N C)(n"0 o w w a 7 N Z at (0 O 7 CD 0 03 W N w 0 p) 0 a) 0 CD v a W O. co y w m x O No CD 0 N V (0 y (D C. m O y O n N O w 7 O 0) 0 O co N N m ci n� 0 3 3 m (0 (O N O Kirk klaricke UUes Becker Fraser Marketplace, LLC (303) 841 -2400 3/26/2008 0 rage 1 or 1 From; Wes Becker (wesbeckerCci}prodigy.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10'20 AM To: kklancke@netspeecl.us Cc: 'Martin cmochancruxco.com Subject: (=mailing; Features_and_Speoifications_T -300 Attachments; Features and_Specifications T- 30D.pdf Kirk, here is some information on the washing machine the individual I am speaking with is considering purchasing for his launder mat. This is a "double load" machine and uses 22 gallons of water per load, or the equivalent of 11 gallons per single load. My understanding is that older single load, top Toad machines use an average of 50 gallons of water per load. The perspective tenant says he would purchase four of these machines and could wash as much as eight standard machines. As I recall the current EQR schedule requires 1.2 taps per washing machine, and assuming that was based on older machines using at least 50 gallons of water per load, we could begin to calculate a reasonable tap fee cost for this individual to consider opening his new business. These new machines ucc 22% of the water per load as compared to an older machine. Thu3 if we multiply four machines times 1.2 taps 4.80 taps, 22% ti 1.05 taps. As I recall the space has .3 taps per 1000 feet already paid for and the space is 1195 sq. ft. I believe this equates to the necessity to purchase approximately .7 taps or $11,200.00. I think this would be a reasonable financial burden for a new launder mat to incur and would assist me in signing a new tenant. This business could also promote itself as a "green" business for water conserving measures and also because he ie looking at very high efficiency dryers as well. It is my understanding that another launder mat located in Fraser is using very old and inefficient machines. I believe this is the "right" thing to do in promoting water conservation measures in Grand County. It seems odd to me that an individual with an interest in opening a new launder mat with state of the art, "green" equipment should be put at a disadvantage when compared to a business operating with antiquated equipment that uses four time the amount of water, not to mention considerably more gas and electricity. Please consider this methodology when calculating the number of taps necessary for this individual to open a new launder mat in the Fraser Marketplace center. Did you .find out when the next Water Board meeting will be held? Unfortunately the perspective tenant cannot consider his interest in moving forward until the water tap question is answered. As always I appreciate your help and know you will do your best to assist me in this matter. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Wes TO 39td 113Mog 98ETSZLOL6 bZ :bT SOH/CZ/GO Kirk Clancke From: Wes Becker [wesbecker@prodigy.net] Sent: Vyedraesday, May 14, 2008 2:04 PM To: kkiancke @netspeed.us Subject: FW; Emailing: Features and_Specifcations T -BOO From aivarezaKa ©aol.com [maiito:aiverezaka©aoi.corn] Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 6 :39 AM To wesbecker©prcdlgy.net Subject: Re: Ema!ling: Features and_Specifications T-300 1 V1L Wes, Here is the website to one oldie possible coinpanys.I can get earth Friendly laundry soaps 'bleach from. Like I said I will supply EARTH FRIENDLY SOAPS .BLAECH.fur guest that use my laundry facility. There will be no need for guests to use there Products i will provide earth friendly products for all customers use_ T wi 1i reduce the use of plastic bottles being brought'tO the facility at the same time promote earth friendly products my store. WES check out these products ive been looking into. www.herbtrader.corn look at home products under lauclry soaps. Thank You Allen Original Message From:: Wes Becker <wesbeckerprodigy.net> To: a @ao1_eom Sent: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:15 am Subject: FW: Emailing: Features_and_Specifcations T -340 From: Wes Becker t rrioiltoiwesbeckera gy.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:20 AM To: kklantke@iletveed.us Cc: 'Martin'; crnoch4racruxco.com Subject: Emailing: Features and_speclficatlons T Kirk, here is some information on the washing machine the individual T am speaking with is cansidcring purchasing for his launder mat. This is a "double load" machine and uses 22 gallons of water per load, or the equivalent of 11 gallons per single load. My understanding is that older single lead, tnp Irma machines use an average of 50 gallons of water per load. The perspective tenant says he would purchase four of these machines and could wash as much as eight standard machines. As 1 recall the current EQR schedule requires 12 laps per yvas iii machine, based on older machines using at least 50 gallons of water per load, we could begin to calculate a reasonable tap fee cost for this individual to consider opening h s new business, "1 "k esc. ric:wa use 22% of the water per load as compared to an older machine. Thng if we riati ly four ri i. hiii s times 1.2 taps 4.80 taps, 22% 1.05 taps. As I recall the space has .3 taps per 1000 feet already pail for and the space is 1195 sq. ft. I believe this equates to the necessity to purchase approximately .7 taps or 11,200.04. I think this would be a reasonable financial burden for a new launder mat to incur and 5114!2008 za 3Edd 113MX0g METH/ALE VZ :tri StEz /s616e September 25, 2008 Fraser Sanitation District Joe Fuqua P.O. Box 89 Fraser, CO 80442 Dear Mr. Fuqua, 3 0\1.-A. CIL,A Lori Clement Planner Planning Zoning Department DEP TMENT OF PLA G AND ZO 308 Byers Ave P.O. Box 239 Hot Sulphur Springs Colorado 80451 970- 725 -3347 Ext 140 or Fax 970- 725 -3303 We have reviewed your application for amending the accelerated aerated lagoon. Fraser Sanitation District's current 1041 Permit allows for an average daily flow capacity of 2.7 MGD and an organic loading capacity at 5,600 lbs BOD per day. The amended request would allow for 2.499 MGD and 5,600 lbs BOD per day. Please be aware that the organic loading capacity of 5,600 lbs BOD per day will be at the limits of the 1041 Permit. If this limit is exceeded than the 1041 Permit will be in violation and may be revoked. Staff has determined that the proposed changes will not exceed the terms and conditions of the current 1041 Permit, therefore an amendment is not required at this time. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. TO: FROM: RE: Thanks Joe Fuqua Jim McLaughlin Spencer Blower with VFD Laughlin Water ENGINEERS, LTD. MEMORANDUM September 23, 2008 Attached is the quote for the new blower. The operating range for the blower is 400 -800 scfm. This blower will operate as a stand alone unit. When more than 800 scfm is needed, the larger blower must be used. If the existing blowers are converted to VFD operation in the future, this blower could be used simultaneously with the others. We recommend that the option for the 60 hp motor be used. It is unlikely that the full 60 hp will be needed and it should be slightly more efficient than the 75 hp version at normal operating conditions. The controls can be programmed to prevent a motor overload, if needed. Please review and call if you want to discuss the proposal. To purchase, issue a purchase order to Spencer Turbine Company in the amount of $121,275. The actual payment schedule is on Page 4. We can do an installation drawing when we get the shop drawings. Since 1892 THE HOME OF: P 4 MIZER' c.em.... TO: PROJECT: PROPOSAL DATE: QUOTATION NO.: ENGINEER: 1 QUOTATION McLaughlin Water Engineers LTD. Fraser, CO WWTP 9/22/08 WW9708018 McLaughlin Engineering Project: Fraser, CO Date: 9/22/08 Quote No.: WW9708018 Exclusive Spencer Wastewater Representative: WATER CONTROL CORPORATION -Tel. (303) 477 -1970 Fax. (303) 477 -1981 The Spencer Turbine Company is pleased to submit a proposal for the supply of equipment described herein. Specification consists of the Requirement, shown below. Our Proposal consists of Spencer's Scope of Supply, our Clarifications and Exceptions and our Terms and Conditions. The proposal covers the supply of all equipment and services described below, but specifically excludes all field work including but not limited to loading and unloading of equipment, demolition, field labor, piping, wiring and supply or installation of other equipment or services described in other sections. Also, Spencer is not responsible for the quality or craftsmanship of work outside of their scope of supply, nor the compliance of that work with local codes and regulations. REQUIREMENT: One cast iron centrifugal blower to deliver 800 scfm against a system pressure of 7.2 psig when operating at 80 °F, 10.703 psia and 36% RH air. The unit must be capable of turning down to 400 scfm at specified conditions. The unit will be controlled with a variable frequency drive. The unit discharges into the same header as the existing Spencer CS39R blowers, but will not run in parallel with them. The motor will be premium efficiency, ODP enclosure, VFD- compatible, 3/60/460V with winding RTD's. Existing Controls will be modified to incorporate the new blower into the existing aeration control system. The required scope of supply is described on the next page. NOTE: It is assumed that there are no changes at the basins. NOTES ON 7/25/08 BUDGET QUOTE: Proposed blower critical speed only 10% over operating speed. A new selection is proposed herein. Budget Proposal mistakenly stated 8" accessories. 6" inlet and 5" discharge accessories proposed herein. Project: Fraser, CO Date: 9/22/08 Quote No.: WW9708018 Qty. (1) 2 SPENCER SCOPE OF' SUPPLY: Spencer Power Mizer® Multi -Stage Centrifugal Blower, model number CS29R16IA1, with top inlet and discharge sized 6" and 5" respectively. The unit includes flexible coupling, coupling guard, heavy -duty fabricated base and vibration isolation pads. Blower bearings are equipped with temperature and vibration sensors and oil reservoir. The blower will be driven by a premium efficient 75 HP motor. Nominal Motor Efficiency is approximately 94.1 Qty. (1) Local Control Panel for blower motor protection Qty. (1) Modification of Existing panel to incorporate new blower into existing aeration system. Qty. (1) 75 HP VFD, 18 Pulse, NEMA 1 enclosure Qty. (1) Blower Flow Meter, FCI ST98 Qty. (1) Inlet Filter Silencer, cartridge -type, 6 FSL90234 Qty. (1) Inlet Expansion Joint, single arch, 6 EXP90025 Qty. (1) Discharge Expansion Joint, single arch, 5 EXP90006 Qty. (1) Check Valve, wafer, 5 VLV90190 Qty. (1) Blower Inlet Temperature Sensor Qty. (1) Current Transformer Qty. (1) ASME PTC10 Code Test Freight to Jobsite Startup Assistance including Installation Check, Startup Assistance, System Modification and Tuning and Operator Training. COMMENTS /CLARIFICATIONS/EXCEPTIONS: Electrical motor starters: Unless specifically stated, these are supplied by others. Special Tools: None required. Paint: Spencer's standard surface preparation of epoxy primer and urethane topcoat finish shall be furnished. 60 HP VS 75 HP Motor and VFD: The quoted brake horsepower of the proposed unit at the rated flow and operating conditions is 58.5 BHP. Some factors that should be considered: 1. Because of casting surface inconsistencies, Spencer's tolerance on tested vs predicted horsepower is 4 1.04 x 58.5 60.8 bhp. 2. The VFD- compatible motor has SF 1.0 3. If either 800 scfm or 7.2 psig is thought to be a conservative requirement, then perhaps 60 HP suffices. a. Flow: We believe flow was determined based on the minimum allowable flow of the existing larger blowers. The predicted minimum allowable flow is very close to 800 scfm at rated conditions. If field performance allows a lower turndown, then perhaps the smaller units will run at a maximum flow 800 scfm. b. Pressure: The smaller units are sized to deliver 800 scfm at rated conditions against 7.2 psig, but if 7.2 psig is required at the rated flow of the larger blowers, (1950 scfm), then something less is required at 800 scfm, due to lower frictional losses, and so 800 scfm could be delivered at a lower rpm and lower hp. 4. If the larger blowers are unable to turn down to 800 scfm, the smaller unit can be over -sped to deliver more than 800 scfm at rated conditions. 5. 60 HP motor is slightly less efficient, (93.6% VS 94.1 A deduct for the 60 HP motor and drive is provided under the pricing section. 3 TERMS CONDITIONS: Project: Fraser, CO Date: 9/22/08 Quote No.: WW9708018 ENGINEERING SUBMITTALS: Spencer will submit its standard package of submittal drawings for approval within approximately six (6) weeks after receipt and acceptance of the purchase order by Spencer. These submittal drawings include, if applicable, mechanical and electrical equipment, mechanical installation recommendations and electrical drawings consisting of control panel layouts and schematics. This submittal does not include engineering calculations or any other engineering information not included above. Approval Drawings are generally submitted in two stages, mechanical and electrical, in order to expedite the project. Any changes to drawings involving additional cost may be for the account of the customer and may effect shipment. FACTORY PERFORMANCE TESTING: Factory testing per ASME PTC10 code, and utilizing fully compliant measurement instrumentation, will be provided. Field performance testing is not accurate or available, and is not included in this quotation. If field performance testing is performed by others, factory test results shall prevail in any discussion of blower performance. SHIPMENT: Shipment will be made approximately sixteen, (16) weeks after receipt by Spencer Turbine Company of approved engineering submittals with release for fabrication. For orders not requiring approval drawings, shipment will be made approximately twenty two, (22), weeks from date of order. The time quoted is based on the projected availability of parts for the equipment offered in this quotation, and may be longer if customer changes are made to engineering submittals, or if lead times for critical items are extended beyond the control of The Spencer Turbine Company. Partial shipment and invoicing may be made to expedite the project. Shipment is subject to any restrictions or regulations imposed by state or federal governments. RIGGING, OFFLOADING, WEIGHT: Any delivery point rigging, offloading or storage is excluded from the quotation unless otherwise stated herein. The weight of the heaviest piece of equipment is approximately 3,200 Lbs. Total weight is approximately 4500 Lbs FIELD ASSEMBLY, ERECTION, INSTALLATION: All equipment will be delivered as fully assembled as possible. When certain items must be delivered partially disassembled because of shipping Iimitations or other special conditions, field assembly will be the responsibility of the customer. This will normally consist of joining sections by mechanical means such as with bolts, nuts and screws. Equipment installation is the responsibility of the customer. Spencer supervision is available at our per diem rate plus all living and travel expenses, to supervise field assembly and/or installation, if required. INSTALLATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS: Four (4) final sets of Spencer's standard operation and maintenance manuals shall be provided at the time of final shipment with an additional set included as part of our document submittal approval package unless otherwise indicated in the contract specifications. START UP SERVICES: Spencer requires two (2) week written notice that the installation is complete and ready for startup to provide startup and training services. In the event that Spencer is notified to perform these services and the equipment status or other circumstances prevent execution of these services, through no fault of Spencer's, additional charges may be invoiced to the Contractor. This proposal assumes that the startup of all blowers can be accomplished in the same trip. Ha phased startup is required in order to keep the plant on line, additional startup trips can be quoted at an additional cost. Where training is required, our bid is based upon alI training taking place during the period specified. Training will take place during normal business hours of 8:00 AM 5:00 PM. 4 PRICE: The price for this equipment is $124,300.00 Project: Fraser, CO Date: 9/22/08 Quote No.: WW9708018 SAFETY Equipment Operation/Hazardous Conditions: The Spencer Turbine Company will provide safety instructions relating to the safe operation and maintenance of our equipment. The purchaser has the responsibility for insuring that this information is reviewed, understood and implemented by all personnel involved in the use or maintenance of our product. If areas of any plant site or installation in which Spencer Turbine Company personnel will be required to work in the course of servicing or consulting contain concentrations of toxic or otherwise hazardous materials that could endanger human safety or health, the purchaser shall provide appropriate personal protective equipment. MECHANICAL WARRANTY: The warranty period will begin with start-up, substantial completion or first beneficial use, and will extend for a twelve (12) month period. The warranty period will not exceed eighteen (18) months after shipment. Parts found to be defective in material or workmanship under normal use and service during the warranty period will be repaired or replaced without charge F.O.B. original point of shipment, the responsibility of The Spencer Turbine Company being limited to the cost of the defective parts. Decomposition by chemical action and wear caused by the presence of abrasive materials shall not constitute defects. See also Spencer Turbine Company "Terms and Conditions" attached hereto. Note: The price assumes approval of VFD and Control Panel in 2008 DEDUCT: 60 HP Motor and VFD $3,025.00 The price assumes approval of VFD and Control Panel in 2008. The price is in US Dollars. The price is F.O.B. shipping point: Windsor, CT Prepaid truck freight to the job site is included. Price quoted is exclusive of any local, state or federal sales or manufacturer's taxes of any sort and such taxes and /or charges pertaining thereto are to be borne by the Purchaser. Price valid for sixty, (60) days from date of quotation. Payment terms are net 30 days from Spencer's date of invoice. Any retainage withheld by the Contractor shall not exceed the percentage being withheld by the Owner for our scope of supply and any reductions in retention by the Owner shall be paid to Spencer within 30 days of such reduction; including, but not limited to, reductions allowed when the work is 50% complete, substantially complete, operational or beneficial use. Payment of Total Order Price Milestone 25% Upon Spencer Submission of engineering drawings for approval 15% Upon receipt of approved submittal drawings release to production 15% Upon Spencer completion of factory acceptance tests and shipment of report 40% Upon delivery of equipment to jobsite 5% Upon completion of training, start-up and /or first beneficial use of the equipment. Note: All payments are NET 30 days from date of invoice. Partial shipments and invoices will be allowed. CONDITIONS OF SALE: All quotations are made and all orders are accepted subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions, and particularly subject to "Disclaimer" and "Limitation of Liability" per attached Form 706M, dated October, 2006, which terms, conditions and restrictions cannot be modified except by a written agreement signed by both parties involved. Equipment will not be checked for proper installation or started up by Spencer service personnel until at least 95% payment is received. Should this equipment be put into operation without first being certified by one of our technicians, all guarantees and warranties are void. BOND REQUIREMENT: Spencer's proposal is predicated on Spencer equipment and services being covered under the General Contractor's or Subcontractor's performance and payment bonds between the Owner and the Contractor. Yours truly, THE SPENCER TURBINE COMPANY Bill Percival 5 Project: Fraser, CO Date: 9/22/08 Quote No.: WW9708018 DELAYS: Spencer will exercise reasonable efforts to meet schedules for completion of the equipment shipment, start-up, and tune -up operations but such schedules are estimates only and may be subject to delays. Spencer will not accept back charges from the General Contractor for delays in the installation, start -up, tune -up, re- installation, or repair of Spencer's equipment for any reason, whether direct or indirect. We wish to thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit this quotation, and trust that it will meet with your favorable consideration. If you have any questions regarding this quotation, please do not hesitate to contact us or our Wastewater Representative, Water Control Corporation, Tel. (303) 477 -1970 Please see attached Spencer Turbine Company "Terms and Conditions" Form 706M, date October 2006, which are part of this quotation. THE SPENCER TURBINE COMPANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALES 1. ACCEPTANCE: The terms and conditions of sale set forth herein apply to any order accepted or acknowledged by The Spencer Turbne Company (SPENCER), Buyers acceptance of SPENCER'S proposal or delivery of all or any part of the order constitutes acceptance of the terms and conditions of sale contained herein, and SPENCER hereby rejects any additions to or modifications of these terms and conditions. Any representations, promises, warranties, or statements by SPENCER or its agents that differ in any way from these terns and Conditions shall be given no force or effect. No contract Is binding upon SPENCER until accepted In writing by SPENCER at its corporate office in Windsor, Connecticut, 2. PRICES; Prices quieted orally expire the same day they are made unless accepted in writing on that day. Written price quotations are effective for thirty (30) days after the date Issued, but may be withdrawn on written notice within that perod, or without notice after that period and prior to Spencers acceptance of the order, and prices adjusted to the prevailing prices at lime of acceptance. If there Is a delay in shipment of the order or if completlan of SPENCER'S performance of the order is due to any change requested by the Buyer or as a result of any delay on the Buyers part In performing or furnishing information required for completion of the order including a delay occurring due to submittal documents that must be reviewed and approved by the Buyer before fabrication taking longer than 60 days to review or any other delays caused by the Buyer for any reason whatsoever, the price agreed upon at the lime of acceptance of order is subject to change by SPENCER to adjust for increased cost of performance. Orders or proposals include only the price for the equipment specified therein, and do not include freight or installation of SPENCER equipment unless otherwise clearly specified. All prices are F.O.B. SPENCER'S plant in Windsor, Connecticut and are exclusive of all coxes, levies, and duties that may be assessed in mnnecdon with the sale or delivery of the goods. and Buyer shall be responsible for all such taxes, levies, and duties. In the event SPENCER pays such tax levy or duty, Buyer shad promptly reimburse SPENCER therefor. My packaging requirements other than SPENCER'S standard packaging and commercial container will be invoiced as an extra charge. Transportation charges to Buyer may not reflect applicable discounts, allowances or fees. Any such amounts offset routs of administration, handling, packing, crating and other relative material handing oast not itemized by SPENCER, and will not be credited to Buyers account. 3. PAYMENT: Payment Is due in full thirty (30) days after the date or Invoice. Ail Invoices paid after the due date wilt be assessed a late payment Barge of one and a heti percent (1.5%) per month or any portion thereof, or the maximum amount allowed by applicable law, whichever is lass. Buyer shall be responsible for all costs of collection, Including reasonable legal fees. The foregoing payment terms are subject to the approval of SPENCER'S credit department and may be changed at any time at SPENCER's sole discretion, H SPENCER has reasonable grounds to doubt Buyer's ability or willingness to make timely payments for goods, SPENCER may at any rime suspend performance, decline to ship, or require advance payment in cash or other adequate assurance sadslactory to SPENCER. 4. SHIPMENTS, DELIVERY, STARTUP AND OPERATION: SPENCER shall use reasonable efforts to meet all shipment delivery dates recited in SPENCER'S Proposal or in Buyers order but any such dates are estimates only based upon current manufacturing and engineering capabiddes and are not guaranteed. SPENCER shall have no liability to Buyer for damages, penalties, or back charges, direct or indirect, for any delay in shipment. delivery, start-up, operations, repair, or re- installation, whether such delay is minor or substantial, nor shall Buyer have the right to declare a breach of contract because of any such delay_ In arty even, delivery and completion schedules are based upon the effedrve date of the order and are subject to prompt receipt by SPENCER of all necessary down payments, information and Instructions troth Buyer, includkng any required approval of drawings. If there is a delay m shipment of the order or completion of SPENCER's performance of the order due to any change requested by the Buyer or as a result of any delay on the Buyer's part in performing or furnishing information required for completion of the order, or any other delays caused by the Buyer for any reason whatso- ever, the price agreed upon at the time of acceptance of order is subject to change by SPENCER to adjust for increased cost of performance. SPENCER shall have the right to make partial shipments, and invoices Covering the same shall be due and payable by Buyer in accordance with the payment terns hereof. SPENCER will attempt to ship in accordance with Buyers Instructions, but SPENCER will make the final selection of a method of shipment and a carrier unless otherwise agreed by SPENCER and the Buyer in writing. SPENCER s not responsible for damage or kiss in transit, and all such darns must be made by Buyer directly against the carrier. 5. CHANGE ORDER: SPENCER shalt not be obligated Ie accommodale any changes in or additions to the scope of the work requested by Buyer or necessitated by circumstances beyond Spencer's control or proceed with scope changes included in 'Approved As Noted' returned submittal comments unless Buyer agrees to an equitaae adjustment In price andtor delivery schedule. 6, CANCELLATION, SUSPENSION OR DELAY: In the event Buyer requests or causes a cancellation, suspen- sion or delay In any of SPENCER's work on any order, Buyer shall indemnify SPENCER and pay all resulting charges, including but not limited to any costs, expenses, and commitments incurred by SPENCER up to the dale of receipt of notice of such cancellation, suspension or delay, plus SPENCER's overhead and reasonable profit. tf shipment is delayed on account of Buyer, the purchase price shad be due and payable as if delivery had been made as scheduled. Additionally, all charges related to storage, disposition and/or resumption of work. at SPENCER'S plant or elsewhere, shall be for Buyer's sole amount and all risks incidental thereto shall be assumed by Buyer. T. CLAIMS: NOTICE OF DEFECTS: Buyer shall give written notice afrey'ecdon of any shipment or portion thereof within thirty (30) days after the data of shipment specifying the reasons therefor. Failure to give such notice shall be deemed a waiver of any right of rejection and any darn with respect thereto (except as to claims under the warranty) and shall be deemed an acceptance of such shipment. Buyer shall set aside and hold rejected goods without further processing until SPENCER has an opportunity to inspect and advise of the disposition, if any, to be made of such goods. In no event shall any rejected goods be returned, reworked or scrapped by Buyer with- out the express written authorization of SPENCER. Modified or custom items may not be returned. Stock items May be returned subject to a restocking charge according to Spencer Material Return Policy. 8. INSPECTION: SPENCER shall have the right 10 inspect, after prior notice, all goods and equipment supplied by it when in operation. If Buyer requires, SPENCER shall execute an appropriate secrecy agreement. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: All proposals, drawings, diagrams, spedflcalions, pricing, and oiler materials relating to the goods or services are the proprietary and confidential Information of SPENCER. Buyer shall not disclose such material or information to others or allow others to use such material or information without the written approval of SPENCER. A9 manuals, drawings or software provided by SPENCER to Buyer regarding or used with equipment sold by SPENCER to Buyer shall remain the intellectual property of SPENCER and shalt not be copied or otherwise duplicated by Buyer without express prior mitten permission from SPENCER except for purposes of raking one backup copy, All such lmellechial property, including all copies. shall be returned to SPENCER B no longer used by Buyer. SPENCER grants Buyer a nonexclusive paid -up license to use such intellectual property In connection with Buyers ownership and use of the equipment 10. PATENTS: SPENCER shall defend the Buyer, but not his assigns, vendees, or users of such equipment, in any action bxoughl against the Buyer in any court of competent jurisdiction alleging that any goods of SPENCER's standard manufacture in the form or condition as furnished by SPENCER infringes any U.S. patent SPENCER will pay any final award of damages assessed against Buyer in any such suit to the extent that the allegations are sustained, provided that (i) the Buyer promptly notifies SPENCER of eny such charge of infringement or the filing of any such suit, and ((1) the Buyer renders every reasonable assistance which SPENCER may require in defending such suit and provided further that (di) the Buyer gives SPENCER full and exdusle control of the defense of such suit. This provision shall not apply B the Buyer has furnished the specification for the goods or has modified the goads and the alleged infringement arises due to the modification. In that event, Buyer shall Indemnify and hold SPENCER harmless for any claim of patent infringement. 11. LIMITED WARRANT': SPENCER warrants that complete units of new equipment sold and/or manufactured by The Spencer Turbine Company will be free from defects fn material and workmanship for a period of 10 months from dale of shipment or 12 months from date of start-up, whichever comes first. SPENCER warrants that replacement parts sold hereunder will be free from defects in material and workmanship fora period of 120 days after the date of shipment. SPENCER warrants that machines that have been completely re-buW at the factory will be free from defects In material and workmanship for a period of 180 days from data of shipment. SPENCER warrants that all parts installed or repaired during field repairs by authorized SPENCER service personnel will be free from defects In material and workmanship for a pedal of 120 day after date of service. Unless expressly stated otherwise, guarantees In the nature of performance specifications furnished In addition to the foregoing material and workmanship warranties on a product manufactured by SPENCER, if any, are subject to certified factory tests corrected for field conditions. Due to the Inaccuracies of field lestng. B a conflict arises between the results of Held testing conducted by or for the user, and certified factory tests conacted for field conditions, the latter shall control. No equipment shall be furnished for acceptance subject to results of held testing. SPENCER will not assume any responsibility under the terms of thls limited warranty on equipment which has not been paid fain full. This warranty does not apply to any equipment that has been disassembled, repaired, or otherwise altered by any person without the written authorization of SPENCER's service department, nor does it apply to any product that has been subject to failure due to corrosive or abrasive attack, misused, damaged, or improperly installed, nor does B apply to motors, controls, and components not manufactured by SPENCER. Motors, controls and other subvendors components thereof are warranted only to the extent of the manufacturers warranty. All warranty work on such products must be authorized by SPENCER and must be performed in an authorized shop as designated by the manufacturer. SPENCER wlfi provide a pass through warranty from the manufacturer that standard software or firmware products furnished hereunder, when used with manufacturers specified hardware, will perform in accordance with manufacturers published specifications, Unless otherwise provided, seller makes no representation or warranty. express or implied, That the operation of software or firmware products will be uninterrupted or error free, ar that the functions contained therein will meet or satisfy the customers intended use or requirements. Software and finnware corrections are warranted fora period of three (3) months from date of shipment, or the remainder of the original warranty, whichever occurs first. SPENCER'S SOLE LIABILITY AND BUYER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY HEREUNDER is THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT, AT SPENCER'S OPTION, OF PRODUCTS NOT COMPLYING WITH THIS WARRANTY. SUCH REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE, AT SPENCER'S OPTION, F.O.B. SPENCER'S FACTORY OR SPENCER OFF SITE REPAIR FACILITY AND SPENCER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INVOICE ALL EXPENSES INCURRED WHEN REPAIRS ARE MADE IN THE FIELD AT THE REQUEST OF THE BUYER. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH HEREIN, SPENCER MAKES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES SUPPLIED HEREUNDER. THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF AND EXCLUDES ALL OTHER WARRANTIES INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITA- TION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR CONFORMANCE TO PURCHASER'S SPECIFICATIONS, 12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: SPENCER'S LIABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO THE GOODS OR SERVICES AND SPENCERS OBLIGATIONS RELATED THERETO SHALL IN NO EVENT EXCEED THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE GOODS OR SERVICES. SPENCER SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO BUYER FOR ANY CON- SEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR ANY REASON WHAT- SOEVER, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES IN THE FORM OF (A) LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUES, OR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS RESULTING FROM THE FAILURE OF THE EQUIPMENT TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS OR WARRANTIES, (8) DAMAGES SUFFERED BY BUYER AS A RESULT OF LOSS OR DOWNTIME OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES OR EQUIPMENT, (C) COST OF REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT, (0) DAMAGES SUFFERED BY CUSTOMERS OF THE BUYER, OR (E)ANY FINES OR PENAL- TIES ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY LAW OR GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. 13. REPAIR OF G0005 EXPOSED TO HAZARDOUS, TOXIC, OR INFECTIOUS MATERIAL: Buyer shall ensure that any goods submitted by Buyer or any of its customers to SPENCER for repairs or other service have been decontaminated and cleaned (including sterilization, ff appropriate) of any hazardous, toxic, or infectious materials, including without limitation any materials listed by the Environmental Protection Agency, OSHA, or any applicable state law as deserving or requiring special treatment. Upon SPENCER'S request. Buyer or Its customer shall certify in willing that such goods contain no such hazardous, toxic or Infectious materials, and that such decontamination has taken place In accordance with accepted practices and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. If special safety equipment is required to protect SPENCER'S service personnel from any such hazardous, toxic, or infectious materials during field service work or otherwise, Buyer shall ensure that such safety equipment Is provided and That the personnel are property instructed. The provisions of this Paragraph shall apply to all work to be performed by SPENCER'S service personnel at any time, whether or not covered by warranty. Buyer shall defend and indemnify SPENCER for any and ad loses, liabilities, expenses, and damages (Including attorneys' fees) arising out of any failure of Buyer or its customer to mmptyfully with these temps. 14. BUYER SUPPLIED DATA: Buyer acknowledges that SPENCER has relied upon all specifications and other data supplied by Buyer to SPENCER M the selection and design of the equipment and the preparation of any proposal In the event the site operating conditions differ from those represented by Buyer and relied upon by SPENCER, any warranties or performance guarantees contained herein affected by such conditions shall be null and void, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon in writing, 15. BACKCHARGES: SPENCER shall not be liable for any backchargas associated with delays in delivery, start-up, tune -up or acceptance, drawing submittals, mobilization, demobilization, removal of equipment costs of operations, or other similar Barges, regardless of whether the delay is attributable to SPENCER or Buyer. SPENCER shall not be liable for any charge for or cost of modifications, adjustments, or servicing of the equipment, or other item whatsoever without express written authorization from SPENCER'S home office in Windsor, CT in advance of incurrence of the particular expense. 18. SPENCER'S REMEDIES: In addition to the other remedies provided herein or by applicable law. In the event Buyer becomes insolvent assigns assets for the benefit of creditors, Is the subject of a bankruptcy petition, or its financial condition has substantially deteriorated, SPENCER may, at its sole option, declare a breach of contract, stop all work hereunder or demand payments in advance as adequate assurance of Buyers performance hereunder. Buyer grants SPENCER a security interest in all goods sold to Buyer by SPENCER and in all accessions (o, replacements for and proceeds of such goads. to secure payment of the full purchase price, plus other charges hereunder. Upon SPENCER's request, Buyer shall execute all security agreements, financing statements, promissory notes and other security documents requested by SPENCER, in the toms deterniaed by SPENCER, 17. ACTIONS: GOVERNING LAW: Any dispute, controversy, or claim against SPENCER with respect to the goods or services, or any of SPENCER'S obligations related thereto, must be commenced within one year from the data of shipment ce rendition of services. All contracts between Buyer and SPENCER shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Connecticut except that body of laws controlling conflict of laws. 18. BOND: In addition to the price specified herein, Buyer shall pay the cost of any bonds which Buyer requires SPENCER to obtain. 19, ENTIRE AGREEMENT: These tarns and cencttions, together with the provisions of any written proposal by SPENCER, constitute the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the goods or services, and supersede any prior or contemporaneous agreements, representations or understandings behveen the parties. No waiver or rtodhfcadon of these terms and conditions is binding unless such waiver or modTcahon is set out in writing signed by an authorized manager or officer at SPENCER. SPENCER'S failure to strictly enforce any rgM on one occasion does not constitute a waiver of that or any other right on any other occasion. Form 706M (10/06) Copyright 0 2006 The Spencer Turbine Company, Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Performance Range Series 2500 Blowers Performance at Standard Density (Air at 68 °F, Relative Humidity of 36%, Inlet Pressure 14.7 psis) 3550 rpm FLOW RATE (M =/hr) 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 6 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 340 680 1019 200 400 600 1359 1699 B00 1000 FLOW RATE (icim) 2039 1200 2379 1400 27 8 110.3 96.5 82.7 68.9 55.1 4t4 27.6 13.8 0 1600 Materials of Construction Casing and heads: cast iron Class 30 Tie rods: zinc plated 1035 steel 1 Interstage sealing: silicone rubber Shaft: AISI 1144 carbon steel Impellers: ASTM A319 cast aluminum 1 Base: A36 structural steel 1 Finish: epoxy primer with urethane topcoat Base pads: 1" thick cork and synthetic rubber Power Mizer® Series 2500 Cast Blowers Exhausters Rugged multi -stage blowers for heavy -duty applications Continuing the more than 100 -year tradition of Spencer innovation in air and gas handling equipment, the Power Mizer Series 2500 combines practicality and performance in multi -stage centrifugal blowers and exhausters. Based on modem engineering concepts and newly developed casting techniques, these blowers were designed and rigorously tested in the laboratory to confirm their functionality and reliability. With their rugged cast components, Series 2500 blowers are suitable for the most severe applications from sulphur recovery and wastewater treatment aeration to felt dewatering in the pulp and paper industry. Corrosion resistant coatings and special materials available. Technical Data 1 Number of stages: 2 -10 1 Operating speed: 3550 rpm 1 Casing design pressure: 25 psig Inlet connection: 6" (152mm) flange 1251b/1501b ANSI drilled and tapped (5" drilling available) 1 Outlet connection: 5" (127mm) flange 1251b/1501b ANSI drilled and tapped 1 Seals: labyrinth (single carbon ring available) Bearings: 6310/6310 ball, minimum 110 bearing life of ten years per AFBMA Lubrication: grease (standard) or oil (optional) Drains are 3/8 NPT with plugs Impeller diameter: 22" (559mm) 1 Impeller tip speed: 341 ft/sec (113 m /sec) 1 First critical speed: 4150 rpm for maximum number of stages 1 Vibration: .19 in /sec maximum Accessories Full line of standard and custom electrical control panels for packaged systems -UL and CUL listed available. 1 Dissolved oxygen control system Flexible sleeve connectors and expansion joints Filters and silencers 1 Butterfly valves and check valves Note: Spencer reserves the right to make design improvements and /or change dimensions without notice. The Spencer Turbine Company, 600 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT USA 06095 TEL 800-232-4321 s 860 -688 -8361 www.spencerturbine.com Series 2500 CS210 38.00 CS22 2 12.00 305 59 1499 913 414 CS23 3 15.25 387 67 1702 1101 499 CS24 4 18.50 470 67 1702 1290 585 CS25 5 21.85 565 76 1930 1478 670 CS26 6 25.00 635 76 1930 1667 756 CS27 7 28.25 718 84 2134 1855 841 CS28 8 31.50 800 84 2134 2044 927 CS29 9 34.75 883 94 2388 2232 1012 (152) 20.50 Direction of Rotation Dimensions inches Dimensions are approximate (mm) and intended for reference only. The 1.00 (25.4) KORFUND PAD May vary depending on motor size 6" INLET 5" OUTLET 965 B 6 (152) U For Customer Approval U Certified Correct Date: Signed: Customer Name: Customer Order No,: Project Name: Sales Order No.: 35 25 (895) 30.875 (784)' 14.375 i22) 24.5 (622) 28.75 (730) Spencer manufactures and markets a complete line of multi -stage centrifugal blowers and exhausters with cast or fabricated construction. For selection assistance, contact your local Spencer representative or The Spencer Turbine Company at marketing @spencer- air.com, Blowers Vacuum Systems with an Engineering Edge Turbine Company, 600 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 -4706 TEL 800-232-4321 a 860- 688 -8361 a FAX 860- 688 -0098 a www.spencerturbine.com Bulletin No. TDS -815.1 Copyright ©2007 The Spencer Turbine Company 0907KBA2.0 0 8 w a a s 0 M N 0 2 w I Lb a) tel 0 w LL Q co o a 0 0 m o LL w 2 H ea ur g 1- oqa nl 01 Indul JON►odeSJOH 0 LO 0 w '0. L) 0 1 01Sd eanssead lei4ueJe}1la 0 0 0 4() r 0 2 LL 0 0 0 Auk 0 0 0 0 L) 0 I0 L N 0 w 0