The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About14) 9A Congestion Management PlanCity Council October 15, 2013 Page 2 of 2 local jurisdictions to determine if they were in compliance with the CMP. Conformance with the CMP assures that local agencies are providing transportation improvements to offset the traffic congestion resulting from new development. The CMP requires that certain provisions be included in the City's Zoning Code to address traffic congestion associated with new development. The CMP also requires monitoring of pre-designated traffic corridors every odd-numbered year. In Temple City, the only CMP designated route is Rosemead Boulevard. However, the City was exempt from traffic monitoring on Rosemead Boulevard this year because the impacts of the Rosemead Boulevard Safety Enhancements Beautification Project would cause inaccurate representation of typical traffic conditions. Cities are also required to submit a yearly Local Development Report (LOR) to report on development activity. The City is in full conformance with the CMP in that all of the development review requirements have been codified into the Zoning Code and all monitoring has been exempted. Adopting Resolution No. 13-4948 (Attachment "A") adopts the 2013 LOR (Attachment "B") and certifies the City's conformance with the CMP. If a city does not conform to the CMP, that city's share of the Gas Tax increase provided by Proposition 111 may be withheld and allocated to the County to be used on regional transportation projects. Temple City's Fiscal Year 2013-2014 share is estimated at $1 ,046,000. CONCLUSION: The City Council is requested to adopt the annual self-certification Resolution No. 13- 4948 and attached Local Development Report. FISCAL IMPACT: Conformance with the Congestion Management Program will allow the City to receive the State Gas Tax funds pursuant to Proposition 111 which is estimated to amount to approximately $1,046,000 for the Fiscal Year 2013-2014. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution No. 13-4948 B. 2013 Local Development Report ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 13-4948 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 WHEREAS, CMP Statute requires the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, to annually determine that the County and Cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Development Report by September 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on October 15,2013. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City of Temple City adopts the Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the 2010 CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City of Temple City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City of Temple City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportation Plan. SECTION 2. That the City ofT em pie City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 201 0 CMP adopted by the LACMTA Board on October 28,2010. 1. By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City of Temple City has and will continue to conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System chapter. 2. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management chapter. 3. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program chapter. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The City Clerk shall enter this Resolution into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 15th day of October, 2013. MAYOR Resolution No. 13-4948 Page 2 ATTEST: City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 13-4948, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of October, 2013 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- City of Temple City 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012-MAY 31, 2013 Date Prepared: October 7, 2013 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 31.00 Multi-Family Residential 13.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less lhan 300,000 sq. ft.) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (50,000-299,999 sq. ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 University(# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Enter "0" if none) ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Page 2 City of Temple City 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012-MAY 31,2013 Date Prepared: October?, 2013 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure with the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 28.00 Multi-Family Residential 3.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 FreestandinQ EatinQ & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq. ft.) 0.00 Office (50,000-299,999 sq. ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq. ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 I nstitutionai/Educational 0.00 University(# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Enter "0" if none) ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Page3 City of Temple City Date Prepared: October 7, 2013 2013 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2012-MAY 31,2013 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) LowNery Low Income Housing 41 Dwelling Units High Density Residential ol Dwelling Units Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet Near Rail Stations Dwelling Units Development Agreements Entered ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet into Prior to July 10, 1989 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged due to "calamity" Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake Dwelling Units Total Dwelling Units 4 Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1 ,OOOs) 0 Page 4 Exempted Development Definitions: 1. LowNery Low Income Housing: As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: -Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. -Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of> or= to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LOR.