HomeMy Public PortalAbout7.D. Adoption of Resolution No. 13-4954 Approving MOU Enhanced Watershed Management Program and Coordinated Integrated Monitoring ProgramDATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
November 19, 2013
The Honorable City Council
Jose E. Pulido, City Manager~
MEMORANDUM
Via: Mark Pers ico, AICP, Community Development Director
By: Robert Sahagun, Public Safety and Services Manager
Andrew J. Coyne, Management Analyst
AGENDA
ITEM 7.0.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 134954 APPROVING A MEMORANDUM
OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY AND MEMBERS OF
THE UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED GROUP
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (EWMP) AND COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING
PROGRAM (CIMP)
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution No. 13-4954 approving a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) between the City and members of the Upper Los Angeles
River Watershed Group for deve lopment of an Enhanced W atershed Management
Program (EWMP) and Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP).
BACKGROUND:
1. On December 17, 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act (CWA) to address
contamination of the nation's rivers and waterways.
2. On November 16, 1990, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published
regulations requiring Nationa l Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permits for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) runoff, which
fundamentally changed the way storm water runoff is regulated at the state and
federal levels.
3. On December 13, 2001, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, (RWQCB) Los
Angeles Region issued a countywide NPDES permit to Los Angeles County and
79 participating cities, including Temple City.
City Council
November 19, 2013
Page 2 of 3
4. On September 6, 2005, the RWQCB adopted new standards regarding Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for heavy metals for the Los Angeles River and
tributaries. Temple City is part of the Los Angeles River watershed known as
"Reach 2" covering approximately 11 0 square miles within the Rio Hondo and
Arroyo Seco sub-watersheds.
5. On April 1, 2008, the City Council approved execution of a Memorandum
of Agreement with the Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) for
participation in the development of a coordinated regional monitoring plan in order
to meet the metals TMDL. The studies completed to date by the GCCOG have
proven very helpful in determining appropriate pollutant levels for metals within
the watershed. These studies have shown that the watershed is not as
contaminated as originally believed when the TMDLs were established. These
studies will reduce the overall clean-up requirements.
6. On August 4, 2009, the City Council approved execution of a Memorandum
of Agreement with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) for
participation in the development of a coordinated San Gabriel Valley-wide
monitoring plan in order to meet the metals TMDL. The studies conducted by the
SGVCOG have been completed and have yielded limited data.
7. On June 4, 2013, the City Council approved a Letter of Intent to participate in the
development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and
Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) with the Upper Los Angeles
River Watershed Group in an amount not to exceed $14,000.
ANALYSIS:
Water quality in rivers and waterways has improved tremendously since the signing of
the CWA in 1972. However, there are still impaired water bodies that require attention.
Restoring water quality is critical to maintaining a healthy environment and ensuring
the sustainability of water bodies. The Los Angeles River and its tributaries are
deemed to be impaired water bodies by the RWQCB because they exceed the
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for five metals: copper, lead, zinc, cadmium and
selenium. The best approach to addressing regional water quality improvements is
through a regional approach which allows for cost sharing among participating
agencies.
Temple City has previously participated in two regional studies conducted by the
Gateway Cities (GC) COG and by the San Gabriel Valley (SGV) COG. As the water
quality requirements evolve the City must keep pace with the changes. The newly
formed Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Group is being led by the City of Los
Angeles and involves 15 public agencies (i.e., Alhambra, Burbank, Calabasas,
Glendale, Hidden Hills, La Canada Flintridge, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Rosemead,
San Gabriel, San Marino, South Pasadena, City of Los Angeles, unincorporated Los
Angeles County, and the County Flood Control District). If Temple City does not
City Council
November 19, 2013
Page 3 of 3
participate in the development of regional monitoring programs, we will be required to
prepare and submit our own plans.
Earlier this year, the City Council approved a Letter of Intent to participate in the
development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and
Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) with the Upper Los Angeles River
Watershed Group, in an amount not to exceed $14,000. The Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) currently being considered by City Council is the nex1 step
towards the development of the EWMP and CIMP. It authorizes the City of Los Angeles
to coordinate the services of a consultant to develop the EWMP and CIMP and grants
the City of Los Angeles and the consultant access to City storm drains, channels, catch
basins, and other facilities in order to prepare the EWMP and CIMP. This MOU
becomes effective December 28, 2013 and must be signed by the Mayor before that
date in order for the City of Temple City to be included in the EWMP and CIMP. The
MOU will remain effective until June 30, 2016.
CONCLUSION:
Participation in the Enhanced Watershed Management Program and the Coordinated
Integrated Monitoring Program is recommended by staff, as it is the most cost effective
method of meeting the new Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
NPDES requirements. The City Council has already approved the Letter of Intent to
participate in the development of a EWMP and CIMP. The next step is for the City
Council to adopt Resolution No. 13-4954 approving the MOU between the City and
members of the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City Council as part of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14 City Budget approved
an appropriation of $14,000 for the NPDES program under account No. 21-960-71-
4277.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution No. 14-4954
B. Memorandum of Understanding
ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No. 13-4954
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMPLE CITY APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY AND
MEMBERS OF THE UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER
WATERSHED GROUP REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION
AND COST SHARING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN
ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND
COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region
adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit); and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012 and
requires that cities within the County of Los Angeles comply with the prescribed
elements of the MS4 Permit; and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identified the City of Temple City as one of the MS4
permittees that are responsible for compliance with the MS4 Permit requirements
pertaining to the Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a letter of intent to participate in the
development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and
coordinated integrated monitoring program (CIMP) with the Upper Los Angeles River
Watershed Group in an amount not to exceed $14,000; and
WHEREAS, the Temple City, City Council, authorizes the Mayor of the City of
Temple City to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on their behalf, supporting
the development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and
coordinated integrated monitoring program (CIMP);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Temple City approves a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the city and members of the Upper Los Angeles River
Watershed Group regarding the administration and cost sharing for development of an
Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) and coordinated integrated
monitoring program (CIMP).
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2013.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 13-4954, was duly passed,
approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular
meeting held on the 191h day of November, 2013, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmember-
NOES: Councilmember-
ABSENT: Councilmember-
ABSTAIN: Councilmember-
City Clerk
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
ATTACHMENT B
THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA, THE CITY OF BURBANK,
THE CITY OF CALABASAS, THE CITY OF GLENDALE, THE CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS,
THE CITY OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO, THE CITY OF
MONTEREY PARK, THE CITY OF PASADENA, THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, THE CITY
OF SAN GABRIEL, THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA,
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT, AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
THE ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND THE COORDINATED
INTEGRA TED MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER
WATERSHED
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into as of the date of the last
signature set forth below by and between: the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation; the
City of Alhambra, a municipal corporation; the City of Burbank, a municipal corporation; the
City of Calabasas, a municipal corporation; the City of Glendale, a municipal corporation; the
City of Hidden Hills, a municipal corporation; the City of La Canada Flintridge, a municipal
corporation; the City of Montebello, a municipal corporation; the City of Monterey Park, a
municipal corporation; the City of Pasadena, a municipal corporation; the City of Rosemead, a
municipal corporation; the City of San Gabriel, a municipal corporation; the City of San Marino,
a municipal corporation; the City of South Pasadena, a municipal corporation; the City of
Temple City, a municipal corporation; the Los Angeles County Flood Control District
(LACFCD), a body corporate and politic; and the County of Los Angeles, a political subdivision
of the State of California, Collectively, these entities shall be known herein as "Parties" or
individually as "Party,"
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ("Regional
Board") adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit); and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012 and requires that
the LACFCD, County of Los Angeles, and 84 of the 88 cities (excluding Avalon, Long Beach,
Palmdale, and Lancaster) within the County of Los Angeles comply with the prescribed elements
of the MS4 Pennit; and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identified the MS4 permittees that are responsible for
compliance with the MS4 Permit requirements pertaining to the Los Angeles River Watershed
Management Area; and
Page I of29
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to collaborate on the development of an Enhanced
Watershed Management Program (EWMP) for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed as
shown in Exhibit C of this MOU to comply with certain elements of the MS4 Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that each shall assume full and independent responsibility
for ensuring its own compliance with the MS4 Penni! despite the collaborative approach of the
MOU;and
WHEREAS, the development of an EWMP includes the preparation of a Work Plan, a
draft and fmal Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Plan ("CIMP"), and a draft and final Enhanced
Watershed Management Program Plan ("EWMP Plan"), collectively referred to herein as
''Plans"; and
WHEREAS, the Parties collaboratively prepared a final Scope of Work and Request for
Proposal to obtain a Consultant for preparing the Plans that will satisfy the requirements of the
MS4 Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that hiring a Consultant to prepare and deliver
the Plans will be beneficial to the Parties and they desire to participate and will provide funding
in accordance with the cost allocation on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that the total cost for developing the Plans shall not
exceed $1,582,344.50 including the project administration and management cost but excluding
I 0% contingency; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to retain the City of Los Angeles to coordinate the
services of a Consultant to develop the Plans, the PaTties have agreed to share in the cost and pay
the City of Los Angeles for these consultant services as provided by Exhibit A of this MOU, and
the City of Los Angeles has agreed to act on behalf of all Parties in the preparation of the Plans
and the coordination of the consultant services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties,
and of the promises contained in this MOU, the Parties agree as follows:
Section I. Recitals: The recitals set forth above are fully incorporated into this MOU.
Section 2. Purpose: The purpose of this MOU is to cooperatively fund the preparation and
submittal of the Plans to the Regional Board.
Section 3. Cooperation: The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another to attain the purpose
ofthis MOU.
Section 4. Voluntary: This MOU is voluntarily entered into for the purpose of preparing and
submitting the Plans to the Regional Board.
Page 2 of29
Section 5. Term: This MOU shall become effective on the last date of execution by the Parties
or December 28,2013, whichever comes first, and shall remain in effect until June 30,2016. !fa
Party does not execute this MOU by December 28, 2013, that Party shall be excluded from this
MOU and this MOU shall become effective on December 28, 2013 by execution by the
remaining Parties.
Section 6. Assessment for Proportional Cost: The Parties agree to pay the City of Los Angeles
for preparation and delivery of the Plans in the amounts shown in Table (4) of Exhibit A, based
on the total costs shown in Tables (I) and (2) and the cost allocation formula shown in Table (3)
of Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part of this MOU by this reference. The City of Los
Angeles will invoice the Parties in two installments upon execution of this MOU as shown in
Table ( 4) of Exhibit A, based on the allocated costs for developing the Plans by the Consultant
and the project administration and management costs at a percentage of 10% of the allocated
costs for development of the Plans. At the end of each fiscal year, the City of Los Angeles will
provide the Parties with a statement with the actual expenditures. Unexpended funds at the
termination of this MOU will be returned to the Parties in accordance with the cost allocation
formula set forth in Table (3) of Exhibit A.
Section 7. City of Los Angeles agrees:
a. To solicit proposals for, award and administer a Consultant contract for the
preparation and delivery of the Plans. The City of Los Angeles will be reimbursed for
the administration and management of the Consultant contract as described in Exhibit
A.
b. To utilize the funds deposited by the Parties only for the administration of the
Consultant contract, project management, and the preparation and completion of the
Plans.
c. To provide the Parties with an electronic copy of the technical memos, draft Plans
and completed Plans within 10 business days of receipt from the Consultant.
d. To notifY the Parties if the actual cost for the preparation of the Plans will exceed the
cost estimates shown on Exhibit A and obtain approval of the increase ftom the
Parties. Upon approval of the cost increase by the Parties, the City of Los Angeles
will invoice the Parties per the cost allocation formula on Exhibit A.
e. To ensure all comments and concerns raised by the Parties during the preparation of
the Plans are addressed to the satisfaction of the simple majority of the Parties.
f. To invoice the Parties in the amounts and according to the schedule shown in Table 4
of Exhibit A.
g. To provide an accounting within 90 days after at the termination of the MOU or
within 90 after the early termination of the MOU pursuant to Section II. The City of
Page 3 of29
Los Angeles shall return the unused portion of all funds deposited with the
City of Los Angeles in accordance with Table 4 in Exhibit A.
Section 8. The Parties further agree:
a. To make a full faith effort to cooperate with one another to achieve the purposes of
this MOU by providing information about project opp01tunities, reviewing
deliverables in a timely manner, and informing administration and council and
appropriate legislative bodies.
b. To fund the cost of the preparation and delivery of the Plans and to pay the City of
Los Angeles for the preparation and delivery of the Plans based on the cost allocation
shown in Exhibit A. This includes the costs incurred by the City of Los Angeles for
administering the Consultant services between awarding the Consultant contract and
the execution ofthis MOU.
c. To grant access rights and entry to the City of Los Angeles and the Consultant during
the terms of this MOU to the Parties' facilities (i.e. storm drains, channels, catch
basins, properties, etc.) ("Facilities") to achieve the purposes of this MOU. Prior to
exercising said right of entry, the City of Los Angeles or their Consultant shall
provide written notice to the Parties at least 72 hours in advance. For the purposes of
this provision, written notice shall include notice delivered via e-mail that has been
delivered to the Parties' representatives identified in Exhibit B.
Section 9. Invoice and Payment
a. Payment: The Parties shall pay the City of Los Angeles their proportional share of the
cost for the preparation and delivery of the Plans and project administration and
management as shown in Table 4 of Exhibit A. Payments are due within sixty (60)
days of receiving the invoice from the City of Los Angeles.
b. Invoice: The City of Los Angeles will invoice Parties in two installments in the
amounts shown in Table 4 of Exhibit A. The first invoice will be sent upon execution
of this MOU or in January 2014, whichever comes first. The second invoice will be
sent in July 2014.
c. Contingency: The City of Los Angeles will notifY the Parties if actual expenditures
are anticipated to exceed the cost estimates contained in Exhibits A and obtain
approval of such expenditures from all Parties. Upon approval, the Parties agree to
reimburse the City of Los Angeles for their proportional share of these additional
expenditures at an amount not to exceed 10% of the original cost estimate as shown
in Exhibit A. This 10% contingency will not be invoiced, unless actual expenditures
exceed the original cost estimate. Expenditures that exceed the 10% contingency will
require an amendment of this MOU.
Page 4 of29
Section 10. Indemnification
a. Each Party shall indemnifY, defend, and hold harmless each other Party,
including its special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, and
agents, from and against any and all liability, including but not limited to
demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including attorney and
expert witness fees), arising from or connected with the respective acts of
each Party arising from or related to this MOU; provided, however, that no
party shall indemnify another pmiy for that party's own negligence or willful
misconduct.
b. In light of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the
State of California imposing ce1iain tort liability jointly upon public entities
solely by reason of such entities being pmiies to an agreement (as defined in
Section 895 of said Code), each of the Parties hereto, pursuant to the
authorization contained in Section 895.4 and 895.6 of said Code, shall assume
the full liability imposed upon it or any of its officers, agents, or employees,
by law for injury caused by any act or omission occurring in the performance
of this MOU to the same extent that such liability would be imposed in the
absence of Section 895.2 of said Code. To achieve the above stated purpose,
each Party indemnifies, defends, and holds harmless each other Party for any
liability, cost, or expense that may be imposed upon such other Party solely by
virtue of said Section 895.2. The provisions of Section 2778 of the California
Civil Code are made a part hereof as if incorporated herein.
Section 11. Termination
a. This MOU may be terminated upon the express written agreement of all Parties. If
this MOU is terminated, all Parties must agree on the equitable redistribution of
remaining funds deposited, if there are any, or payment of invoices due at the time of
termination. Completed work shall be owned by all Parties. Rights to uncompleted
work by the Consultant still under contract will be held by the Party or Parties who
fund the completion of such work.
b. If a Party fails to substantially comply with any of the terms or conditions of this
MOU, that Party shall forfeit its rights to work completed through this MOU, but no
such forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting Party has first been given
notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged default.
Section 12. General Provisions
a) Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this MOU, and any
request, demand, statement or other communication required or permitted hereunder
shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the Representative of the Party at the
Page 5 of29
address set forth in Exhibit B. Parties shall promptly notifY each other of any change
of contact information, including personnel changes, provided in Exhibit B. Written
notice shall include notice delivered via email or fax. A notice shall be deemed to
have been received on (a) the date of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular
business hours, or by confirmed facsimile or by email; or (b) on the third (3) business
day following mailing by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the
addresses set forth in Exhibit B.
b) Administration. For the purpose of this MOU, the Parties hereby designate as their
respective Party Representatives the persons named in Exhibit B. The designated
Party Representatives, or their respective designees, shall administer the terms and
conditions of this MOU on behalf of their respective Party. Each of the persons
signing below on behalf of a Party represents and warrants that they ar·e authorized to
sign this MOU on behalf of such Party.
c) Relationship of Parties. The Parties are and shall remain at all times as to each other,
wholly independent entities. No Party to this MOU shall have power to incur any
debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of another Party unless expressly provided to
the contrary by this MOU. No employee, agent, or officer of a Party shall be deemed
for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee or officer of another Party.
d) Binding Effect. This MOU shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each
Party to this MOU and their respective heirs, administrators, representatives,
successors and assigns.
e) Amendment. The terms and provisions of this MOU may not be amended, modified
or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all the Parties. This section
applies to, but is not limited to, amendments proposed to address regulatory changes
in the MS4 permit, modifications to the Scope of Work, or changes in the number of
Parties to this MOU. For the City of Los Angeles, the Director of Bureau of
Sanitation or his/her designee is authorized to execute such amendments.
1) Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this MOU of any term, condition, or covenant of this
MOU shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenar1t. Waiver
by any Party to ar1y breach of the provisions of this MOU shall not constitute a waiver
of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any
provision of this MOU.
g) Law to Govern· Venue. This MOU shall be interpreted, construed and governed
according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the
Parties, venue in the state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Los
Angeles.
h) No Presumption in Drafting. The Parties to this MOU agree that the general rule that
an MOU is to be interpreted against the Party drafting it, or causing it to be prepared
shall not apply.
Page 6 of29
i) Entire Agreement. This MOU constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous
agreements, whether written or oral, with respect thereto.
j) Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this MOU is declared
or determined by any court or competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or
unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this MOU shall not be affected thereby
and this MOU shall be read and constructed without the invalid, void, or
unenforceable provision(s).
k) Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute but one and
the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts shall have been
delivered to all Parties to this MOU.
1) All Parties have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this
MOU. Accordingly, this MOU shall be construed according to its fair language.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this MOU to be executed by
their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature of the Parties:
Page 7 of29
CITY OF THE TEMPLE CITY
Date: _________ _ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
By ____ ~~~~--~~--~
Cynthia Sternquist, Mayor
ATTEST:
Peggy Kuo, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deputy City Attorney
Page 22 of29
EXHIBIT A
Table 1 Estimated Consultant Contract Cost .
lteni ' ' ' ·', . .. '.·. '
'' ' ·. ' '·· .. ·. .·•· '
., ' Total C()s,t .. · ..•• ' ,'
Contract Cost (a) $ 1,438,495.00
City of Los Angeles Contract Management Fee (10%) (a) X 10% =(b) $ 143,849.50
SUB-TOTAL COST (a)+(b)=(c) $1,582,344.50
LACFCD Allocation (10%)1 (c) x 10% =(d) $158,234.45
TOTAL COST TO BE DISTRIBUTED (c)-( d)=( e) $1,424,110.05
Note.
1. The Los Angeles Flood Control District (LACFCD) has committed to contributing 10% of the Total Cost. including contract
management fee, as their allocation in the development of the Plans.
Table 2 Distribution of Estimated Total Cost
~g~n~y •••. '. ···•·.· ·•• .. ,. , \ . I . 12. ..
. .. Acre~ ' ·· ; . , , •• ~ercentof ··••·. /
1, • ,. ; Area' , • ' ··'·
'·.·.· Distribu,t~d .·. ···.•· •. ·
:: · '· •. ; Total Cost' • , .' .'
Alhambra 4,884.31 1.60% $22,683.50
Burbank 11,095.20 3.62% $51,527.85
Calabasas 4,005.68 1.31% $18,603.01
Glendale 19,587.50 6.40% $90,967.43
Hidden Hills 961.03 0.31% $4,463.19
La Canada Flintridge 5,534.46 1.81% $25,702.90
Los Angeles 181,288.00 59.22% $841,929.98
Los Angeles County 41,048.07 13.25% $190,633.71
Montebello 5,356.38 1.75% $24,875.87
Monterrey Park 4,951.51 1.62% $22,995.59
Pasadena 14,805.30 4.84% $68,758.14
Rosemead 3,310.87 1.08% $15,376.20
San Gabriel 2,644.87 0.86% $12,283.19
San Marino 2,409.64 0.79% $11,190.75
South Pasadena 2,186.20 0.71% $10,153.06
fremple City 2,576.50 0.84% $11,965.67
froTAL 306,645.53 100.00% $1,424,110.05
Note.
1. The areas owned by Caltrans, State Parks, and U.S. Government have been excluded from the total area of the Upper Los
Angeles River watershed.
2. Area (acres) determined by GIS analysis as shown in EXHIBIT C
3. Percent Area = Agency Area IT otal Area
4. Total Cost= $1 ,424,110.05 X Agency Percent of Area
Page 25 of29
EXHIBITC
UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVE R WATERSHED
EWMP/CIMP GROUP
Los Angeles Watershed group participating in this EWMP
-----~::,~-----r~::~:::~---;;;;;;~A;.~-_______________________ J.J~~~9~-
Al hambra 4,884.31 1.59%
Burbank 11,095.20 3.62%
Cala basas 4,005.68 1.31%
City of los Angeles 181,288.00 59.1 2%
Gl endal e 19,587.50 6.39%
Hidde n Hills 961.03 0.31%
La Canda Flintridge 5,534.46 1.80%
Los Angeles County 4 1,048.07 13.39%
Montebello 5,356.38 1.75%
Monterey Park 4,951 .51 1.61%
Pasadena 14,805.30 4 .83%
Ro se mead 3,310.87 1.08%
San Gabriel 2,644.87 0.86%
San Marino 2.409.64 0 .7 9 %
South Pa sa dena 2,186.20 0 .71%
Temple City 2,576.50 0 .84%
LACFC D
Group Total 306,645.53 100%
-=-··-·i
l-··-:
SHADED AREAS NOT
USE IN CALCUlATION
I
\
.'J •..
LEGEND
Los Angeles River
Upper Los Angeles D Upper LA Watershed Group
Watershed Boundary Participating in this EWMP
Flood Control D Upper LA Watershed Ag encies not
District Te rr itory Participating in this EWMP
Upper Los Angeles River Watershed N
A ;.lmr_....;':,oi..-w--•J'.til" EVVMP A 1qenc1es
-
BUREAU OF SAN ITIATION ~ EIIRIOUE C ZAlOIV}.R SHAHR.:.M KH.'-R;.c.HAJJI
DIRECT OR PRCGR~l.M MAl lAGER
I
DATE
. l ORA\'.11BVo CHECKED BY 6.'1~t'J Thl., m~p ~h•hdl h• c~du 1 ~p:oc!..u ad d a •n~ ~~
UV.RW_E\~MPA.~n;~ UH l~er~of,•,.ht:lhlf lot d:1.1rtbuton Oflt'-'l~.•dlcut tl'le;:r~r WA!nSIIED I DATE REVISED .tnltte P*II'IVSSito ol rne De~l ol PuG11.: W elh . C oty or lot. :..nQ*'U ~~~;o;ry<?;lc;?~ ThOl'll n !11>1 Datii.,IOIIK!IIC.• ,.,,11:1 P«nu;~IM ~nl td!.>,•Tl-lot.&AS !ROS Ui.P