Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout6/23/1998 specialCity of Greencastle . City Hall Four East Walnut Street Greencastle, Indiana 46135 Pamela S. Jones Clerk- Treasurer GREENCASTLE COMMON COUNCIL SPECIAL SESSION TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1998 5:30 P.M. CITY HALL The Greencastle Common Council met in Special Session Tuesday, June 23, 1998, 5:30 p.m. at City Hall. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order. On the Roll Call, the following were found to be present: Councilor Roach, Councilor Hammer, Councilor Green, Councilor Baynard and Councilor Masten. Also present was: City Attorney Trudy Selvia and Greencastle /Putnam County Development Center President Gary Pershing. Resolution 1998 -20, A Resolution Authorizing The Expenditure of Industrial Development Funds (Funding the Greencastle/Putnam County Development Center), was read by Mayor Michael. Councilor Roach made the motion to adopt Resolution 1998 -20 with two stipulations: 1) The GDPC change the by -laws to include a City Council representative as an automatic appointment to the Executive Board of the GDPC, and 2) The GDPC change the by -laws stating that no employee of the GDPC shall be a • voting member of any board or commission related to the City in which there could pose a conflict of interest with goals of the GDPC. Motion was seconded by Councilor Masten. Councilor Hammer asked if these stipulations were immediate. Councilor Roach stated these stipulations had to be met prior to funding. Mayor Michael stated that past practice is that the Executive Committee of the GDPC has been appointed by the President of the GDPC and only the President would be an automatic appointment. Mayor Michael further stated that the City Board appointment they are talking about is a mayoral appointment and for the record, taking Bill Dory off of the Plan Commission or the Board of Zoning Appeals would be a great loss to the community. Mayor Michael continued that she has a problem with this and feels her appointment represents the best interest of the City. Councilor Roach stated that all positions are very important, but in the best interest of both the City and the GDPC, it is best not to tie those important people up on the boards. This only stipulates they cannot be a voting member it does not exempt them from attending or being in an advisory position. Mayor Michael stated that all positions are volunteers, they are not paid, and if I knew my opinion wouldn't count I wouldn't go to the hassle of attending. Councilor Roach stated that hejust wants to make sure all votes are above board and since the GDPC has an interest in planning, they could have an ad hoc member. Councilor Masten stated that he was uncomfortable with taking the appointment because it is a Mayoral appointment, but there are two issues that need to be looked at. One is that issues of development and issues of adherence to Ordinances are very often at odds and developers don't • always want to comply with the Ordinances. Two, when the same individual represents development and has to come back and represent the community, it makes it very difficult. We " don't want to make you appointments, but it is an impossible task to put someone in. Mayor Michael stated that in her opinion both serve foster good development. Councilor Hammer stated that the Council has passed an Ordinance to over ride a Plan Commission recommendation with a simply majority and now we are trying to take one of their members. Are we micro - managing the Plan Commission? Councilor Masten stated the Ordinance only effects a small amount of their business and getting rid of the 2 /3rds vote was a timely thing and had to be done - this could be related. Councilor Baynard stated that sitting on the Plan Commission he got to hear all of these things. Some attorneys say it is a conflict others say it is not, but by doing this there is no question. Councilor Hammer asked if the stipulations needed to be tied to the funding. Mayor Michael replied that she is not willing to take Mr. Dory off the board unless it is tied to the funding. Gary Pershing, President of the Greencastle/Putnam County Development Center, stated that in no way through appointment of the Executive Committee did he intentionally eliminate the City Council. Mr. Pershing stated he was appointed President in January 1997 and had no intention of leaving City out. President Pershing further stated that they have a very strong board and he would not have a problem bringing on a City Council member, but he would have to take it to the Board to see if they are willing to change the by -laws. On the second issue, Mr. Pershing stated that when you ar dealing with volunteers it is hard to deal with conflict of interest. They have tried to work this out the best they can, but he also has to take this before the Board before any decisions can be made. Bill Marley stated that he feels we have lost site of where it started and not lose site of the fact that " IBM gave the money to the City for economic development when they left. Through the years the City has not spent one penny of City property tax money on GDPC, this has always been paid from the interest earned on the IBM money. Mr. Marley stated he feels the money is being held hostage for funding on the GDPC and the direction the board takes. Councilor Hammer asked if the second stipulation could be phased in as Mr. Dory's appointment expires. Mayor Michael stated that his term expires January 31, 2001. Councilor Roach stated he'd just as soon make the cut now. Vote was as follows: Councilor Roach yes Councilor Hammer no Councilor Green yes Councilor Baynard yes Councilor Masten yes Resolution 1998 -20 passes 4 -1. Resolution 1998 -21, A Resolution Appropriating TCI Monies for Purchase of Equipment for Cable Access and Creating Appropriation 101005441 - Cable Access Equipment. Motion to accept made by Councilor Masten, seconded by Councilor Hammer. Vote was unanimous. Resolution 1998 -25, A Resolution Authorizing Appropriation of 53000.00 to Appropriation 204001443 in the City of Greencastle Park and Recreation Budget. Motion to accept made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Hammer. Vote was unanimous. " Mayor Michael reminded the Council she needs their appointment to the Cable Access Committee. " Councilor Masten stated he has talked to Rick Woodall, but Mr. Woodall has not yet called him back. Consensus of Council is to accept Mr. Woodall, providing Mr. Woodall will accept the appointment. Motion to adjourn made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Hammer. Vote was unanimous. Nancy A. t hael, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela S. Jones, " "