The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About11) 8A Adoption of Reso No. 14-5016 Certifying Conformance witht he Congestion Management Program for June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014DATE: TO: FROM: AGENDA ITEM B.A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM August 5, 2014 The Honorable City Council Donald E. Penman, Interim City Manager1B Via: Michael D. Forbes, AICP, Community Development Director.~ By: Adam L. Gulick, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 14-5016 CERTIFYING CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR JUNE 1, 2013 TO MAY 31, 2014 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 14-5016 certifying conformance with the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program. BACKGROUND: 1. In 1990, Proposition 111 was passed in California requiring all cities and counties to adopt measu res to reduce traffic congestion in their region. 2. In 1992, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA} implemented a Congestion Management Program (CMP). In accordance with this program, every city must make an annual determination of conformance . 3. On October 28, 2010, the LACMTA adopted their latest CMP . 4. On July 21, 2014, a public hearing notice was published in the Temple City Tribune. ANALYSIS: The passage of Proposition 111 in 1990 provided an increase in the State Gas Tax to fund regional transportation improvements (Streets and Highways Code, Section 21 05) and created the CMP to mon itor regional transportation conditions. The state legis lature required the LACMTA to establish a CMP, which would annually monitor local jurisdictions to dete rmine if they were in compliance with the CMP. Conformance City Council August 5, 2014 Page 2 of 2 with the CMP assures that local agencies are providing transportation improvements to offset the traffic congestion resulting from new development. The CMP requires that certain provisions be included in the City's Zoning Code to address traffic congestion associated with new development. The CMP also requires monitoring of pre-designated traffic corridors every odd-numbered year. In Temple City, the only CMP designated route is Rosemead Boulevard. However, the City was exempt from traffic monitoring on Rosemead Boulevard this year because the impacts of the Rosemead Boulevard Safety Enhancements Beautification Project would cause inaccurate representation of typical traffic conditions. Cities are also required to submit a yearly Local Development Report (LOR) to LACMTA to assist them with planning regional transportation projects. The City is in full conformance with the CMP in that all of the development review requirements have been codified into the Zoning Code and all monitoring has been exempted. Adopting Resolution No. 14-5016 (Attachment "A") adopts the 2014 LOR (Attachment "B") and certifies the City's conformance with the CMP . If a city does not conform to the CMP, that city's share of the Gas Tax increase provided by Proposition 111 may be withheld and allocated to the County to be used on regional transportation projects. Temple City's Fiscal Year 2014-2015 share is estimated at $1,071,000. CONCLUSION: The City Council is requested to adopt the annual self-certification Resolution No. 14- 5016 and attached Local Development Report. FISCAL IMPACT: Conformance with the Congestion Management Program will allow the City to receive the State Gas Tax funds pursuant to Proposition 111, which is estimated to amount to approximately $1,071 ,000 for the Fiscal Year 2014-2015. ATTACHMENTS: A Draft Resolution No. 14-5016 B. 2014 Local Development Report ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 14-5016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 WHEREAS, CMP Statute requires the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, to annually determine that the County and Cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Development Report by September 1st of each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 5, 2014. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City of Temple City adopts the Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the 2010 CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City of Temple City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City of Temple City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMTA Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportation Plan. SECTION 2. That the City of Temple City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 2010 CMP adopted by the LACMTA Board on October 28, 2010. 1. By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City of Temple City has and will continue to conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System chapter. 2. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management chapter. 3. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program chapter. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The City Clerk shall enter this Resolution into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 5th day of August, 2014. MAYOR Resolution No. 14-5016 Page 2 ATTEST: City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 14-5016, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of August, 2014 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- ATTACHMENT B City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 23,2014 2014 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2013-MAY 31,2014 Contact: Michael Forbes Phone Number: (626) 285-2171 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2014 DEFICIENCY PLAN SUMMARY *IMPORTANT: All "#value!" cells on this page are automatically calculated. Please do not enter data in these cells. DEVELOPMENT TOTALS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Dwelling Units Single Family Residential (8.00) Multi-Family Residential (4.00) Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1 ,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 69,241.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 11,095.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq. ft.) (18,080.00) Office (50,000-299,999 sq. ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 I nstitutionai/Ed ucational 0.00 University(# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Daily Trips ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS Exempted Dwelling Units 4 Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1 ,OOOs) 0 2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3. Page 1 City of Temple City 2014 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2013-MAY 31,2014 Date Prepared : Ju ly 23 , 2014 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0 ." PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Single Fam ily Residential 42.00 Multi-Family Residential 18.00 Group Quarters 0 .00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300 ,000 sq .ft.) 69,241.00 Commercial (3 00 ,000 sq . ft. or m ore) 0.00 Freestanding Eating & Drin ki ng 11,095.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50 ,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (50,000-299 ,999 sq .ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq . ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0 .00 Government 0.00 I nstitutionai/Educational 0 .00 University(# of students) 0 .00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips l Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "0" if none ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 Pag e 2 City of Temple City 2014 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2013 -MAY 31, 2014 Date Prepared: July 23, 2014 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category , enter "0." PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORT ANT: Adjustments may be cla imed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period , and 2) demolition of any structure with the reporting per iod. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Single Family Residential 50.00 Multi-Family Residential 22 .00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300 ,000 sq . ft .) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0 .00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50 ,000 sq.ft.) 18,080.00 Office (50, 000-299,999 sq. ft.) 0.00 Office (300,000 sq. ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Institutional/Educational 0.00 Un iversity(# of students) 0 .00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Enter "0" if none ENTER IF APP LICABLE 0.00 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0 .00 Page3 City of Temple City Date Prepared: July 23, 2014 2014 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2013 ·MAY 31,2014 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for that category, enter "0." PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) LowNery Low Income Housing 41 Dwelling Units High Density Residential ol Dwelling Units Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments ~I 1 ,000 Gross Square Feet Near Rail Stations Dwelling Units Development Agreements Entered ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet into Prior to July 10, 1989 Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged due to "calamity" Dwelling Units Reconstruction of Buildings ~I 1,000 Gross Square Feet Damaged in Jan. 1994 Earthquake Dwelling Units Total Dwelling Units 4 Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1 ,OOOs) 0 Page4 Exempted Development Definitions: 1. LowNery Low Income Housing: As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: -Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. -Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or fioor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of> or= to 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LOR.