HomeMy Public PortalAbout04-089 - 1 RESOLUTION NO* 04-089
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFO1tNIA9
ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 02-12-071 (GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE), CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ADOPTING THE NIITIGATI4N MONITORING PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
FOR THE CITY OF CARSON
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES,AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City of Carson initiated an update to the Carson General Plan to include
the following elements: Land Use; Economic Development; Transportation and Infrastructure;
Housing; Safety;Noise; Open Space and Conservation; Parks, Recreation and Human Services; and
Air Quality.
WHEREAS, the General Plan Update process included a citizen participation program
implemented through town hall meetings and public workshops; and
WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") was prepared according to
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") concerning the General
Plan Amendment No. 02-12-071 ("General Plan Update"); and
WHEREAS, a formal 45-day public review period for the DEIR was provided from
October 30,2002 through December 13, 2002,extended to January 13, 2003; and
WHEREAS, in response to comments on the DEIR, a Recirculated Draft Environmental
Impact Report("RDEIR")was prepared according to the requirements of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, a formal 45-day public review period for the RDEIR was provided from July
28,2003 through September 11, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the DEIR, RDEIR and Response to Comments comprise the subject Final
Environmental Impact Report("FEIR"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting of October
14, 2003, considered evidence including public testimony, and a report prepared by City Staff, and
by Resolution No. 03-1963, recommended to the Carson City Council adoption and certification of
the FEIR subject to the Statement of Findings (attached hereto as Exhibit "A") Statement of
Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program (attached hereto as Exhibit "B")
concerning the General Plan Update, and adoption of the General Plan Update for the City of
Carson, subject to certain modifications on file with the Planning Secretary;
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 2 of 10�
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at their meetings of May 18, June 15,
and July 6, 2004 to consider the final draft of the General Plan Update of the City's General Plan
and Resolution No. 03-1963 recommending approval of same by the Planning Commission,
including the modifications thereto; and
WHEREAS, after considering evidence presented at the public hearing including public
testimony, reports prepared by City Staff, and the recommendation by the Planning Commission,
the City Council adopted and certified the FEIR subject to the Statement of Findings (attached
hereto as Exhibit"A") Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program
(attached hereto as Exhibit"B") concerning the General Plan Update, and adopted the General Plan
Update for the City of Carson, subject to certain modifications, including some modifications
suggested by the Planning Commission and others initiated by the City Council, which
modifications are shown on Exhibit"C"hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Pursuant to the legal requirements for publishing and conducting a public
hearing on the DEIR and RDEIR and responses thereto, and the City Council having considered the
response to all comments received thereon,which comments and responses have been attached to
the RDEIR, and incorporated therein,which are part of the FEIR, and the recommendation by
Resolution No. 03-1963 of the Planning Commission, City Council hereby approves and adopts the
FEIR, Statement of Findings,Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding
Considerations for the General Plan Update.
Section 2: The City Council hereby certifies the FEIR as having been completed in
compliance with CEQA.
Section 3: That the City Council hereby finds with respect to the adverse environmental
impacts detailed in the FEIR:
a. That the adverse environmental impacts which may result from implementation of
the General Plan Update have been considered and recognized by the City Council.
b. That the comments and responses on the DEIR and RDEIR have been considered
and recognized by the City Council and incorporated into the FEIR.
C. That based on information set forth in the DEIR and RDEIR and responses thereto,
the City Council finds and determines that measures to mitigate certain impacts
exist and are included in the FEIR.
d. That a Statement of Facts and Findings was prepared pursuant to section 15091 of
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 3 of 100
the CEQA Guidelines.
e. That a Mitigation Monitoring.Program was prepared according to.the requirements
of the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.
f. That based upon mitigation measures referred to in the FEIR, environmental
impacts of this project are mitigated to a level of less than significance with the
exception of the following impacts identified in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations, acopy of which is on file with the Secretary of the Planning
Department: 2020 Traffic Volumes/Roadway Capacities, Consistency with CMP
Standards, Construction Emissions, Vehicle Miles Traveled and Stationary
Emissions, Traffic Noise and Railroad Noise, Groundwater Depletion, Accidental
Release of Hazardous Materials, Air Toxic Emissions, Oil Contamination and
Landfill.
Section 4: That the City Council hereby finds and determines that all feasible measures
have been incorporated into the General Plan Update, which will mitigate or substantially avoid
any significant environmental effects, and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program, a
copy of which is on file with the Secretary of the Planning Department.
Section 5: That the City Council hereby finds that the Statement of Facts and Findings
identifying any significant environmental effects and making findings related thereto has been
prepared in compliance with section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines and hereby adopts the
Statement of Facts and Findings attached hereto as Exhibit"A".
0
Section 6: As to those impacts that cannot be adequately mitigated, as described in
Section If above, the City Council hereby adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations and
Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as Exhibit"B".
Section 7: That the City Council has considered the General Plan Update and the
Planning Commission's suggested modifications thereto, and hereby adopts the General Plan
Update for the City of Carson, a copy of which is on file with. the Secretary of the Planning
Department, subject to certain modifications, as shown on Exhibit"C"hereto. Such modifications
at Exhibit "C" include some recommended modifications from the Planning Commission and
others approved by the City Council.
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 4 of 100
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAYOF CT 0 ER,2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
'ot
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CftY ATTO 4E)?f%0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF CARSON )
I, Helen S. Kawagoe, City Clerk of the City of Carson, California, do hereby certify that the whole
number of members of the City Council is four; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 04-089
as duly and regularly adopted by said Council at an adjourned regular joint meeting duly and regularly held
on the 11th day of October, 2004, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Dear, Calas, Santarina, and Ruiz-Raber
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
I low—
or"
City Clerk, City of Carson,, Calif rnia
• Resolution No 04--089
Wage 5 of 100
E "N'
STATENFM OF FACrS AND F.MINCTS '
i • f �
f •
F
r
• see Statement of Pacts and Findin g s foIlowIn this page .
•
•
f
•
•
gF
5 •
t �
� f
•
•
i
Resolution No. 04--089
Page b of IGO
CARSON GENEW PLAN ENVINONMWAL IMPACT I&INT �
STATEMENT OF FANS MR F1 NBINGS
i. MON
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a Lead Agency issue
two sets of findings prior to approving a project that will generate a significant impact
on the environment. The Statement of Facts and Findings is the first set of findings
where the Lead Agency identifies the significant impacts, presents facts supporting the
conclusions reached in the analysis, makes one or more of three findings for each
impact, and explains the reasoning behind the agency's findings.
There are three finding categories available for the Statement of Facts and Findings
pursuant to Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines.
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantiall y lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
2. Such changes or alterations within the responsibility and jurisdiction of
another public agency and not the agency malting the finding. Such changes
have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such
other agency.
3. Specific economic, legal,social, technological, or other considerations,including
provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make
infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final
EIR.
These findings are presented later in Sections IV and V.
The Statement of Overriding Considerations is the second set of findings. Where a
project will cause unavoidable significant impacts, the Lead Agency may still approve
the project where its benefits outweigh the adverse impacts. Further, as provided in the
Statement of Overriding Considerations, the Lead Agency sets forth specific reasoning
by which benefits are balanced against effects,and approves the project.
The City of Carson, the CEQA Lead Agency, finds and declares that the proposed
General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been completed in compliance
with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Carson (the "City") finds and
certifies that the EIR was reviewed and information contained in the EIR was
considered prior to approving the proposed Carson General Plan herein referred to as
the"project."
December 2013 1 SWOMORI of Facts and
Findings
Resolution No. D4-089
Page 7 of 100
CARSON GENOW FIAN ENVININMENTAt IMPACT REPORT
Based upon its review of the EIR,
p the Lead Agency finds that the EIR is an adequate
assessment of the potentially significant environmental impacts of the City of Carson
proposed General Plan (the "project"), represents the independent judgment of the
City,and sets forth an adequate range of alternatives to this project.
The Final EIR is composed of the following elements:
a. Recirculated Draft-Revised Sections, Carson General Plan Environmental Impact
Report,July 11, 2003;
b. Responses to Comments, September 2003;
c. Public Review Draft, Carson General Plan Environmental Impact Report, October
30, 2002Y-P
d. Responses to Comments,February 2003; and
e. Revised EIR Sections, which reflect errata identified in the Response to
Comments(February 2003 and September 2003);
f. Technical Appendix,October 30,2002, and revised July 11,2003.
The remainder of this document is organized as follows:
II) Description of Project Proposed for Approval;
III) Effects Determined to be Less Than Significant;
IV) Effects Determined to be Mitigated to Less Than Significant Levels;
V) Environmental Effects Which Remain Significant and Unavoidable After
Mitigation; and
VI) Alternatives to the Proposed Project.
Statement of Facts and Findings 2 08010119r2913
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 8 of 100
CARSON GENERAL PLAN ENNIONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Iwo
6
11. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT APPROVAL
PROPOSED FOR
The project consists of the proposed Carson General Plan, as described below.
GENEULPM
The Carson General Plan was last comprehensively updated in the early 1980s through
the late 1990s. The current General Plan UpdateSUDersedes p the previous General Plan and includes a reorganization of the General Plan into the following elements: Land
Use, Economic Development, Transportation and Infrastructure, Housing, Safety,
Noise, Open Space and Conservation, Parks, Recreation and Human Services and Air
Quality.
Existing development in Carson generally corresponds with the current General Plan.
The General Plan proposes two new Land use designations: Business Park/Limited
Industrial and Mixed Use. In addition,the General Plan proposes the City's open space
uses receive land use designations separate and apart from"Public Facilities",which will
now be referred to as Public and Institutional Uses. The proposed open space
designations are General Open Space and Recreational Open Space.
The Program EIR shall evaluate potential environmental impacts resulting from the
following revisions to the City's General Plan,including but not limited to:
• Update of existing conditions,with year 2000/2001 serving as the baseline year.,
• Update the General Plan development projections to the year 2020. Projections
for population, employment, residential development and non-residential
development have been updated for the year 2020.
• Amendment of the Land Use Element,including:
Establishment of building intensities for all commercial, industrial and
institutional land use categories.
• Refinement of uses within the Public Facilities designation, which
includes separating the uses into three land use designations:
Public and Institutional Uses;
- General Open Space(new designation);and
Recreational Open Space(new designation).
• Creation of two new land use designations: Business Park/Limited
Industrial and Mixed Use.
• Creation of a new Land Use Map.
• Amendment of the remaining General Plan elements to reflect items 1 and 2,
above.
• Additions, Deletions or Modification to the General Plan Goals, Policies and
Implementation Programs.
December 2003 3 StAtIflient of Facts and Findings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 9 of 100
�
CUSOM GUIENAL PLAN DIVINONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
oft".
FRONOMIMMEGROWM
The City of Carson is approximately 83 percent built out. As such, the proposed
General Plan will focus on preserving and enhancing residential neighborhoods,guiding.
remaining development activities and encoura
ni ging revitalization and redevelopment of
selected areas. In total, the Iand use growth anticipated within the planning horizon of
the proposed General Plan would result in the following scenario:
• 26,972 dwelling units;
• 2,995,598 square feet of general commercial;
0 1,752,268 square feet of regional commercial;
• 170,900 square feet of mixed use-residential;
0 4,467,400 square feet of mixed use—business park;
• 2,995,280 square feet of business park;
0 23,290,787 square feet of light industrial;and
• 23,180,968 square feet of heavy industrial.
For the non-residential categories, these numbers represent a total of 58,953,201 square
feet of development. The 26,972 dwelling units will result in a City population of 98,830
in 2020.
In addition to the General Plan 2020 estimates, the City has developed estimates for
growth over existing conditions. The anticipated growth in residential, commercial,
industrial and business parks over year 2000 conditions is:
• 2,142 dwelling units;and
• 14,448,731 square feet of commercial, mixed use, business park and industrial
related uses.
Statement o(Facts and Findings 4
December 2��3
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 10 of 100".
CARSON GENERAL PLAIT ENWRONMEMAL IMPACT REPORT .
5
111. EFFECTS BETUMINE TD BE LESS 111A111 SIGNIRGANT
The Carson General Plan EIR found that the proposed project will have a less than
significant impact on a number of environmental topics. A less than significant
environmental impact determination was made for each of the following topic areas
listed below.
IL LUR ME M NEWAR KNONG
1. Consistency With Relevant Federal And State Plans And Policies. Implementation of
the proposed General Plan may result in potential consistency impacts with federal
and state plans and policies. The consistency of the proposed General Plan with
specific Federal and State plans is presented in Table 4.1-3, Proposed General Plan
Consistency With Federal and State Plans or Policies.
Polices in the Proposed General Plan: TI-6.2,.OSC-2.1, 0SC-2-2, OSC-2-3. OSC-2,4,
OSCAL AQ-1,12 AQ 1.2, AQ-1,39 AQ-2,11 AQ-2.29 AQ-2,37 AQ-2,41 AQ-2-51 AQ-
2.61 AQ-2,71 AQ-31,AQ-3-2,AQ-5.1 and AQ-5.2.
2. Consistency With Relevant Regional Plans And Policies. Implementation of the
proposed General Plan may result in potential consistency impacts with policies in
SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: The policies are identified in Table 4.1-4,
General Plan Consistency with SCAGs Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide
Policies.
3. Consistency With Relevant Local Plans And Policies. Implementation of the proposed
General Plan may result in potential consistency impacts with local plans and
policies. The consistency of the proposed General Planwith local plans is presented
in Table 4.1-5,Proposed General Plan Consistency with Local Plans or Policies.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: LU-3.2, LU-4.1, LU-4.2, LU-4.3, LU-4.4,
LU-4.5,LU-6,4,LU-6.7,LU-6-8,LU-7-2 and LU-8.1.
4. Land Use Compatibility. Development associated with implementation of the
proposed General Plan may result in direct impacts regarding land use
compatibilities.
Policies in the Pr
gposed General Plan: LU-3.1, LU-3.2, LU-3.3, LU-6.2, LU-6-3,
LU-6.8, LU-7.1, LU-7.2, LU-7.3, LU-7,4, LU-7.5, LU-7,6, LU-7.7, LU-7.8, LU-8.1,
LU-8.2 and LU-8.3.
December 2083 5 Statement of Facts and Ftadings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 11 of ].40
CARSON GENOM PLAN ENVIIONMENTAL WFACT REPORT
*C UNt.
L POPVUTIOIK WROVEEK Mil Howie
1• Population Growth. Population growth associated with implementation of the
proposed General Plan may increase within the City through the planning horizon
year of 2020.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: No policies within the proposed General
Plan apply to potential impacts due to population growth.
2. Housing Growth. Implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in an
additional 1,839 housing units for the City of Carson.
Policies in the Provosed General Plan: LU-6-2, LU-6.5,LU-15.1, LU-15.2,LU-15.3.
H-1.5,H-2.3,H-3.1,H-3.2,H-3.3,H-3.4,H-6.8 and ED-1.1.
3. Employment Growth. Employment growth associated with implementation of the
proposed General Plan i's anticipated to result in an increase in employment growth
within the City.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: ED-3.3, ED-3.4, ED-5.1, ED--5.2, ED-5.3,
ED-6.6, LU-6.5.LU-151,LU-15.2 and LU-15-4.
c. TMSPOlffATION
1. Consistency With CMP,AQMP and RUP. Implementation of the proposed General
Plan may result in inconsistencies with the CMP,AQMP and RMP.
Policies in the Prgposed General Plan: TT-2.6, TI-5.1, TI-6.2, TI-6.3, TI-6.4, TI-6.5,
AQ-2,L AQ-21v AQ-2-31 AQ-2-49 AQ-2-5 AQ-2. ,AQ- .1 and AQ-3.2.
2. Alternative Transportation. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result
in an incremental increase in demand for transit service and may enhance policies
supporting alternative transportation.
Policies in the Provo,ed General Plan: TI-4.1, TI-4.2, TI-4.3, TI-5.1, TI-5.2, AQ-2-5
and AQ-3.2.
a
GEOIJ818 Pis ionic cos
1. Landslides. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in impacts
related to landslides.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:SAF-1.1.
Statement of Facts and Findings 6 December 2083
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 12 of 100
CARSON GENERAL FUN ENVININMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
G_
E PUNUOSEM013MBUTIUM3
1. Electricity. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in increased
demand in electricity service provided to the City.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:OSC-3,3,
2. Natural Gas. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in increased
demand in natural gas service provided to the City.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: No policies within the proposed General
Plan apply to potential impacts to gas service.
3. Telephone. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in increased
demand in telephone service provided to the City.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:TI-9.2.
F. MUGIMTNMIUM
I. Aircraft Overflight. The accident potential from aircraft overflights may impact
structures and individuals within the flight pattern of the Los Angeles terminal
control area.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: No policies are identified in the proposed
General Plan.
December 2003 7 Statement If Facts and Findings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 13 of 100
CARSON GENBAL FIAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT V. EFFECTS DMININE TO BE TW
LESS
WUH MITIUTION
L No Qum
The project's potential impacts in regards to air quality that can be mitigated or are
otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.4,Air Quality, of the General
Plan EIR. Identified impacts include consistency with regional plans.
LESS THAN SIGAVICAW IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
1. Consistency With Regional Plans. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may
conflict or obstruct implementation of the Southern California Association of
Government's Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines (RCP) and the South Coast
Air Quality Management District's Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP),
Findings
I. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts of consistency with regional plans have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: AQ-2.1, AQ-2-2,TI-6.1,T1-6.2 and TT-6.5.
L NOISE
The project's potential impacts in regards to noise that can be miti gated or are
otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.5, Noise, of the General Plan
EIR. Identified impacts include construction,aircraft and stationary noise.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMpACT WITH MITIGATIONINCORPORATED
1. Construction Noise. Development associated with implementation of the proposed
General Plan would involve construction-related noise as future parcels are developed
and/or renovated.
Statement of Facts and Findings i Docerober 203
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 14 of 100
CARSON GENEUL PIAN ENVININMWAL IMPACT REPORT
5
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to construction noise have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:N-1.1, N-14@2 N-1.3 and N-2.1.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICAAT LV1P4 C T WITH MIT
2. Aircraft Noise. Future operation of the Long Beach Airport and Compton Airport
may be a significant noise source to surrounding land uses.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to aircraft noise have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:N-1.1,N-1.2,N-1.3,N-6.1 and N-6.2.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
3. Stationary Noise. Stationary noises within the City may impact adjacent land uses.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the pro0 ject
0
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
December 2003 9 Statement of Facts and Findings
Resolution No 04-089
Page 15 of 100
CARSON GENERAL PLAN FXVIRONHWAL IMPACT RESORT
2. The effects identified in'th e General Plan EIR have b een determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to stationary noise have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: N-1.1, N-1.2, N-1.3, N-1.S, N-3.2, N-3.3, N-
7.1,N-7.2,N_7.3,N-7.4,N-8.1 and N-8',2.
c.
GEILOWO IND sonic a
The project's potential impacts in regards to geologic and seismic hazards that can be
mitigated or are otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.6, Geologic
and Seismic Hazards, of the General Plan EIR. Identified impacts include fault rupture,
seismic groundshaking,liquefaction,soil erosion and unstable or expansive soils.
LESS THAN SIGATFICAAT IMPACT N?TH MITIGATION rCoRpl)RATED
1. Fault Rupture, Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in geologic
or seismic hazards with respect to rupture of a known earthquake fault.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
Z. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to fault rupture have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAB-1,1 SAT.1.2 and SAF-1.3.
Statement at Facts and Findings �p
December 20 03
Resolution No, 04-089
Page 16 of 100
CARSON 6 ENVIRONMENTAI IMPACT AEPOIT
LESS
THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH1yjITIGATIONINCORPORATED
29 Seismic GrOundshaking, Seismic groundshakinLy and secondary seismic effects in the
City during an earthquake on the nearby regional faults may cause lama e to
development resulting from implementation of the proposed General Plan. g
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to seismic groundshaking h ave been eliminated o substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by rtue of the policies in the r
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as well
as the recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAF-1.1, SAF-1.2, SAF-1.3 SAF-
SAF-3,2, 3.1 and
Ktig-ation Measures:_ In addition to the policies listed above,the following miti ation
measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts: g
MM-SAF-1 Due to the potential for ground shaking in a seismic event
individual development projects shall comply with the standards set
forth in the Uniform Building Code(most recent edition) to assure
seismic safety to the satisfactions of the Department of Building
and Safety prior to issuance of a building.permit, including
compliance with California Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 117(Guidelines for Evaluation and Mitigating Seismic
Hazards in California, adopted March 13, 1997). Given the
proximity of the Avalon-Compton fault within the City of Carson,
more stringent measures maybe warranted.
MM-SAF-2 Individual development projects shall comply with non-structural
seismic mitigation measures, e. . overhead y
use safe g glass �eatments shall
ry glass or film; vending machines, ice machines (if used)
and other types of machines and equipment shall be bolted or
braced. Pictures and decorative items within common areas shall
be secured for earthquake safety.
MM-SAF-3 Ensure individual development projects compliance with current
seismic mitigation codes.
December 2803 11 Statement of Facts and fludIngs
Resolution No. .04-089
Page 17 of 1.00
= CAR ptAll OMBINNEXTAL IMPACT REPORT
LESS TH"
SIGNIFIC,1W IMPACT N?THMITIGATIONINCORPORATED
3. Liquefaction. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in impacts
related to liquefaction.
F
indings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in., or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the General Plan EIR,
29 * The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
I. The potential impacts attributed to liquefaction have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as well
as the recommended mitigation measure identified in the General Plan EIR,
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAF-1.1 and SAF-1.3.
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above,the following mitigation
measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-SAF-4 Due to the potential for liquefaction within the project vicinity,
individual development projects shall comply with the standards set
forth in the UBC (most recent edition) for structures on-site to
assure safety of the occupants to the satisfaction of the Department
of Building and Safety prior to issuance of a building permit.
These standards included compliance with California Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 117 (Guidelines for
Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, adopted
march 13, 1997) and "Recommended Procedures for
Implementation of CDMG Special Publication 117-Guidelines for
analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California" (Dr.Geoffrey
R.Martinet al,May 1999).
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
4. Soil Erosion. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in pac im ts
related to soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
Statement of Facts and Findings 12
ON810ber2813
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 18 of I00 --
CA'SON-G-ENOW PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
�y
2 The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not significant. to be
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to soil erosion have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as well
as the recommended mitigation measure identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the ProvosedGeneral Plan:OSC-2.3.
Mitization-Measures: In addition to the policy listed above, the following mitigation
measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-SAF-5 Grading plans for development approved drainage and ero on control plan S to include an
impacts from erosion and sedimentation during gradinl�planse
should conform to all standards adopted by the City and meet
the requirements of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans
(SWPPS)required by California State Water Resources Control
Board.
LESS TMN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
5. Unstable or Expansive Soils. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may
result in impacts related to expansive soils or soil strength.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to unstable or expansive soils have been e
or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant eliminated
the proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in by virtue of the policies in
well as the recommended mitigation measure identified in he General Plan EIR, as
EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: No policies within the proposed General
Plan apply to potential impacts resulting from unstable geologic units or expansive
soils.
December 2083 13 Statement of Facts and Fludinos
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 19 of 100 ._ .
r CARSON GENERAL FIAN ENVIRINMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
u- �
Mitieation' Measures: The following mitigation measure is recommended to further
reduce any impacts:
MM-SAF-6 Future development shall comply with all recommendations
contained in site-specific geologic, geotechnical, and structural
design studies prepared for land development projects. These
geotechnical reports shall address soil conditions,including low soil
strength, shrink swell potential and other unstable soil conditions.
Recommendations contained in these site-specific studies shall be
reviewed and approved by the Building Official and incorporated
in to final grading and structural design plans, as deemed
appropriate by the Building Official.
D.
MMOLIGYM=UBE
The project's potential impacts in regards to hydrology and drainage that can be
mitigated or are otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.7,Hydrology
and Drainage, of the General Plan EIR. Identified impacts include water quality
standards and waste discharge requirements, drainage and runoff, and flooding/dam
inundation.
LESS TH,4N SIGNIFICANT IMPACT W1THMflIGATIONINCORPORATED
1. Water Quality Standards and Waste Discharge Requirements. Future construction
activities and post-construction uses resulting from implementation of the proposed
General Plan violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts to water quality standards and waste discharge requirements
have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by
virtue of the policies in the proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the
General Plan EIR, as well as the recommended mitigation measures identified in
the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: OSC-2.1, OSC-2.2 and OSC-2-3.
Statement of Facts and Findings 14
December 2803
Resolution No. 04-089
Page
20 -of :100 - -.
CARSON GENGM FIAN UMNINUENTAL INFACT REPORT
5'
Mitigation Measures;_ In addition to the policies listed above,the followin mitt atio
measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts. g g n
MM-HYD-1 Individual development projects would be required to prepare
drainage/grading plan fo-
r approval b Y the Los Angeles Coun a
Department of Public Works prior to issuance of grading
permits.
MM-HYD-2 Individual development projects would be required to construct
any parkway drains or similar devices required by the
draining/grading plan prior to issuance of a building permit.
MM-HYD-3
To ensure that construction activities associated with individual
development or redevelopment projects would not degrade
46
water quality, future development projects shall be required to
develop and implement a water quality control plan as deemed
necessary by the City, and/or the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board. In addition, the proposed water quality
control plan shall also be required to comply with the National
Pollutant Discharge Eli mi
process. nation System (NPDES) permit
As part of the review/permitting process, individual development
projects shall be required to mitigate potential adverse water
quality impacts that are associated with both construction and
operational phases of the development. Measures to comply
with this requirement could include, but shall not be limited to
the following:
a. Individual project applicants shall file a Notice of Intent
where required by applicable law and obtain a construction
permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board. Evidence of said permit shall be provided to the City
prior to the issuance of building permits (required for
projects greater than five acres).
b• Individual development projects shall comply with Best
Management Practices for stormwater management. Such
practices shall address both long-term operational aspects of
the project, as well as the construction stage.
c• Individual project applicants shall prepare a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to address the
prevention of both point and non-point pollution sources.
The SWPPP will include structural facilities, ongoing
maintenance and monitoring provisions to verify compliance
with the Plan and permit process.
DOCOMber-2083 15
Statement let Facts ON Fludings
Resolution No. 04-=089
Page 21 of 1001
CMSON GFXBAL PLAN EMNONMWAL IMPACT REPORT
MM-HYD-4 For individual development projects that fall into one of the
Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plans (SUSMP) project
types, characteristics or activities, the project design shall comply
with the applicable provisions of the SUSMP, and if required by
the SUSMP, shall include structural and other measures to
collect the first 3/4-inch of stormwater runoff from the site, and
control peak flow discharge.
LESS Tm4N SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
2. Drainage and Runoff. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in
impacts to drainage patterns in the City'of Carson that may lead to erosion, siltation
or surface water runoff. In addition, implementation of the proposed General Plan
may create or contribute runoff water to the stormwater drainage systems in the
City.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the p
roject
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
I. The potential impacts attributed to drainage and runoff have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as well
as the recommended mitigation measure in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAF-2.1 and TI-8.2.
Mitigktion Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the following
mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-HYD-5 To ensure that runoff does not exceed storm drainage capacity,
individual development projects shall be evaluated by the City's
Engineering Services Department to assess specific requirements
for both on-site and localized drainage facilities. Local drainage
facilities shall be consistent with the City's Master Plan of
Drainage. In addition, an engineered site drainage plan shall be
prepared for individual development projects in accordance with
City requirements.
Statement of Facts and Findings 16 December 2113'
Resolution No. 04411111111111111089
Page 22 of 100
CARSON GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL INFACT REPORT
G'
LESS THd4NSIGMFICANT IMPACT WlTI,fMITIGATIONINCORP �
ORATED
3. Flooding/Dam Inundation, Implementation of the proposed General Plan ma result
in potential flooding impacts within the City of Carson. y
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to flooding/dam inundation have been eliminated
or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in
the proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as
well as the recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Provosed General Plan,: SAF-2.1, SAF-2-2, SAF-2-3, SAF-24, SAF.
2.5 and SAF.3.2
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the followin
mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts, g
MM-HYD-6 Individual development projects located within t e I floodplain shall evaluate the extent of the flooding hazard and 00-year
ensure that all finished floor elevations are located above the
base flood elevation. These projects shall be reviewed by the
City's Engineering Services Department to ensure consistency
with City requirements.
E PUBUC IRVIN$Mg FACIUT13
The project's potential impacts in regards to public services and utilities that can be
mitigated or are otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.8, Public
Services and Utilities, of the General Plan EIR. Identified impacts include fire
protection,police protection,library facilities,water, sewer services and solid waste.
December 2003 17 3181810801 of Facts and Findings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 23 of 100 . _ . ..
CARSON GENNAL PIAN WININMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
�'rttllA�
LESS TJzW SIGAVIC&VT IMPACT WlTHMITIGATIONINCORPORAT ED
1. Fire Protection. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in the
need for additional fire facilities or personnel.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts to fire protection services have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAF-5.1, S .3, SAF-5,4, SAF.
5.5 and SAF-5.6.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICAM IMPACT WITH MITIGATIONINCORPORATED
2. Police Protection. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in the
need for additional police facilities or personnel.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts to police protection services have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAF-6.1, SAF-6-2, SAF-6.4, SAF-6,5, SAF-
6.69 SAF-6.7, SAF-7,1,SAF-7.2, SAF-73,SAF-7.5,SAF-7-6,'I'I-10.1 and 1'I-10.2.
Additional Policies to be Included in the Proposed General Plan: The Safety
Element of the proposed General Plan shall address the need for future Sheriff
facilities. In conjunction with the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department,policies
Statement of Facts and findings 18 December 2003
Resolution No. 04--089
-Page 24 of 100 ...
CARSON GENEUL FIAN ENVININMEXTAL IMPACT 8011T o
shall be formulated to meet identified-
facility needs and shall be incorporated into the Safety Element.
LESS TMN SIGAVICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
3. School Facilities, Implementation of the proposed General Plan ma y t he
result in
need for additional school facilities.
Findings
I. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts to school facilities have been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the proposed
General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: TI-10.1.
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above,the following mitigation
measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts.
PS-1 Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy, individual project applicants
shall submit evidence to the City of Carson that legally required school impact
Mitigation fees have been paid per the mitigarion established by the Los
Angeles Unified School District or the Compton Unified School District.
LESS THAN SIGATFICAM LWACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
4. Library Facilities. Implementation of the proposed General an may result in
increased demand for library services and the need for additional library facilities
within the City.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
December 2003 19 Statement at Facts and findings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 25 of I00 ..
CARSON KNOW FujN FAVIllNUWAL IMPACT REFINT
KM,N
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts to library facilities have been eliminated or substantiall
lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the r y
General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR. p oposed
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:TI-10.1.
Additional- Policies to be Included in the Provosed General Plan: The Parks,
Recreation and Human Services Element of the proposed General Plan shall
address the need for additional Library facilities and materials. In conjunction with
the Los Angeles County Library, policies shall be formulated to meet identified
0
needs and shall be incorporated into the Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Element.
LESS TH"SIGNIFICAW IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
5. Water. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in increased
demand for water service within the City.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, twhich avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effectasidentified
in the General Plan EIR.
2• The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts to the water system and services have been eliminated
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: 0SC-2.1. OSC-2. 0S S 41. , OSC.
2.52 TI-8.12'I'I-8.2,TI-10.1 and TI-10.3.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LmPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
6. Sewer Services. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in
increased demand for the sewer system within the City.
Findings
19
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
Statement of Facts and Findings 20 December 2883
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 26 of 100
CARSON GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT �
ruM.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts to sewer services have been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the proposed
General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:TI-8.1,TI-8.2,TI-10.1 and TI-10.3.
LESS TmN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
7. Solid Waste. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in increased
demand for the solid waste service provided to the City.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts attributed to solid waste production have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as well
as the recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: OSC-4.1, OSC-4.2 and OSC-4.3.
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the following
mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-PS-2 Future development projects shall participate in the eaasting
curbside recycling and yard waste collection programs.
MM-PS-3 Recycling bins shall be provided by project applicants at all
construction sites. All recyclable materials currently being
accepted at either the landfill and/or recycling centers shall be
recycled at construction sites.
MM-PS-4 On-site recycling bins shall be required for retail, business, office,
manufacturing and industrial facilities.
December 2803 21 Statement of Facts sad Fludlovs
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 27 of 100 - - -
a
CARSON GENEW FUiN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
F. aura,REON3TION M8 NVIM 83VICES
The project's potential impacts in regards to parks, recreation and human services that
can be mitigated or are otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section
Parks, Recreation and Human Services, of the General Plan EIR. Identified im acts include parkland and recreational facilities. p
LESS THANSIGNLPICANT IMPACT N?TIYMITIGATIONINCORPORATED
1• Parkland and Recreational Facilities. Implementation of the proposed General Plan
may result in significant impacts to the adequate availability of parkland and
recreational facilities within the City.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to parks and recreational facilities have been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the
policies in the proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General
Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: LU-6.4, LU-6,6, LU-9,7, LU-15.1, LU-15.69
OSC-1*12 PRC-161, PRC-14,2, PRC.1,-3-,, PRC-1.4, PRC-4.1, PRC-4,2, PRC-4.3 and
PRC-5,1,
�. Luc OWTV MR UFEff
The project's potential impacts in regards to public health and safety that can be
mitigated or are otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.10, Public
Health and Safety, of the General Plan EIR. Identified impacts include hazardous
materials use,generation and transport;and rail li ne hazards.
LESS THAN SIGATFICAAT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
1. Hazardous Materials Use, Generation and Transport. New commercial or industrial
development in accordance with the proposed General Plan may result in an
increased risk of upset associated with the routine use, generation and transport of
hazardous materials,which may pose a health or safety hazard.
Statement of FOUS led Findings Y2
88COMber 2813
Resolution No. 04-089 .
Page 28 of 100
CA'SON rAENEM F'AN ENERONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
sr�,►
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to hazardous materials use, generation and
transport have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than
significant by virtue of the policies in the proposed General Plan, which are also
referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: LU-7.4, LU-7.5, TT-1.1, AQ-5,2, SAF-4.1,
SAF-4.2,SAF-4.3,SAF-4,4,SAF-4.5, SAF-4,6 and SAF-4.7,
LESS TMN SIGNIFICAM IMPACT WITH MITIGATIONINCORPOR4TED
2. Rail Line Hazards. Development in accordance with the proposed General Plan may
result in an increased hazard associated with train operations.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to rail line hazards have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:LU-10.2.
No OULTUMLIENOROFS
The project's potential impacts in regards to cultural resources that can be mitigated or
are otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.11, Cultural Resources, of
the General Plan EIR. Identified impacts include historical structures or resources,
archaeological resources,paleontological resources and disturbance of human remains.
December 2803 23 Statement of Facts and Findings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 29 of 100
CARSON GENERA1,ALAN ENVINONMEUK WFACT REPORT
LESS THAN SIGMFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPOR4 TED
1. Historical Structures and Resources. Implementation of the proposed General Plan
may result in the degradation or Loss of historic structures or resources.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts to historical structures and resources have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan, which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR, as well
as the recommended mitigation measure identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: PRC-9.1,PRC-9-2 and PRC-9.3.
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the following
mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-CR-1 Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an
evaluation of the significance of paleontological, archaeological
and historical resources and the impact of proposed development
on those resources.
MM-CR-2 Promote the preservation of significant historical resources and
encourage other public agencies or private organizations to assist
in the purchase and/or relocation of sites, buildings and structures
deemed to be of historical significance.
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
2. Archeological Resources. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result in
the adverse change of archaeological resources.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Statement of FaCts and Findings 24 December 2093
-.- - Resolution No. 04-089
Page 30 of 100
CARSON GENEW PLAN ENV189NUWK IMPACT RESORT
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts to archaeological resources have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the
recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: No policies within the proposed General
Plan apply to potential archaeological impacts.
Mitigation Measures: Refer to mitigation measure MM-CR-1. In addition, the
following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-CR-3 Require monitoring of grading operations by a qualified
paleontologist or archaeologist when the site is reasonably
suspected of containing such resources. If, as a result, evidence of
resources is found, require the property to be made available for a
reasonable period of time for salvage of known paleontological and
archaeological resources by qualified experts, organizations or
educational institutions.
MM-CR-4 Require development on land containing known archaeological
resources to use reasonable care to locate structures, paving,
landscaping and fill dirt in such a way as to preserve these
resources undamaged for future generations when it is the
recommendation of a qualified archaeologist that said resources be
preserved in situ.
LESS TMNSIGNIFICAAT IMPACT WITH MITIGATIONINCORPORATED
3• Paleontological Resources. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may result
in the destruction of a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature.
Findings
1, Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts to paleontological resources have been e liminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the
recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR.
December 2003 25 Statement of Facts end Fludinos
Resolution No. 0.4-089
Page 31 of 100 ..
CARSON GENERAL PIAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: No policies within the proposed General
Plan apply to potential paleontological resource impacts.
Mitization Measures: Refer to mitigation measures MM-CR-1 and MM-CR-3- No
additional mitigation measures are required.
LESS TH"SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
4. Disturbance of Human Remains. Implementation of the proposed General Plan may
result in the disturbance of human remains.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The potential impacts to the disturbance of human remains have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the
recommended mitigation measure identified in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed- General Plan: No policies within the proposed General
Plan apply to potential impacts,regarding human remains or burial sites.
M Measures: Refer to mitigation measure MM-CR-1- No additional
mitigation measures are required.
L AE EFICS
The project's potential impacts in regards to aesthetics that can be mitigated or are
otherwise less than significant are discussed in Section 4.12,Aesthetics, of the General
Plan EIR. Identified impacts include visual quality and light and glare.
LESS THAN SIGMFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED
1• Vaual Quality. Development associated with implementation of the proposed
General Plan may degrade the visual quality of the surrounding environment within
the City.
statenlent of Facts and Findings 26 Becember2883
Resolution No. 04,--089
Page 32 of 100
CARSON KNOW FIAN ENVIRONMENTAI IMPACT AEFIRT
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
I. The potential impacts to visual quality have been eliminated or substantiall y
lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the proposed
General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: LU-2.1. LU-2-2, LU-2-3, LU-3.1, LU-3,2,
LU-33, LU-7,4, LU-7-7, LU-7,8, LU-91, LU-9.2, LU-9-3, LU-9.4, LU-9,5, LU-9,6,
LU-9.7, LU-9.8, LU-12.1, LU-12.2, LU-123, LU-12,4, LU-12,5, LU-12,6, LU-111,
LU-112, LU-13.3. LU-13.4, LU-13.5, LU-13,6, LU-13-7, LU-141, LU-14,Z Lu-
14,39 LU-16.2, ED-3.9, ED-3.10 ED-7.2, ED-11.1, TI-4.2, SAF-6@8, OSC--1.1, OSCm
1,22 OSC-13, 0SC-1e4,PRC-1.1 and PRC-1-4,
LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT N?TH MITIGATION&CoRpoju TED
2• Light and Glare. Light and glare from new development associated with
implementation of the proposed General Plan may adversely affect sensitive
receptors such as residential uses.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The effects identified in the General Plan EIR have been determined not to be
significant.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The potential impacts attributed to light and glare have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the policies in the
proposed General Plan,which are also referenced in the General Plan EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: LU-7-2,LU-7.4,LU-9.8 and LU-12-5.
December 2003 27 Statement of Facts anti Fludin s
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 33 of
CARSON GENOW PLpIJ FAVININMFXTAI IMrACTBE PORT
Y. ENEBINM13ffAL EFFECTS WMION INNN
SIGNIRCANTAND an
INAVOIBUIX p FMA NMUT19N
In the environmental areas of transportation/circulation, a'
and drainage, public services and utilities and public heal h and l safe�l t' hydrology
instances where environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable chere are 12
Mitigation. These areas include the following: after
A. Traffic/Circulation - 2020 Traffic Volumes/Roadway Capacities on 41 roadway
segments, including three roadway se
unacceptable service level under existing conditions; currently operate at an
Be Traffic/Circulation—Consistency with CMP Standards;MWAMMUMM"
Ce Air OualLty—Construction Emissions;
D• Air QualLq-Vehicles Miles Traveled and Stationary Source Emissions•
E. Noise_Traffic Noise;
F. Noise—Railroad Noise;
G. Hydrolo2v and DrainaRe—Groundwater Depletion;
H. Public Health and Safety-Accidental Release of Hazardous Materials-
e!y I. Public Health and Saf -Air Toxic Emissions; '
J. Public Health and Safety-Oil Contamination;and
K. Public-Health and Safety-Landfills.
L 2121 Tuffle VOIBNES/800WAY WABITI13
S UNAVOIDABURIAWAr x'�ER MITIGATION
I. TrafflclCircukfion-2020 Tra Volumes/Roadway Capacities. Implementation
of the
proposed General Plan would result in an increase in traffic volumes for the
planning horizon year of 2020,which would impact the capacities of roadways '
the City of Carson. Most traffic impacts (traffic volumes/roadwa capacities)
� ltlun
resulting from the proposed General Plan would be less than significant y
except for 41 roadway segments. The 41 deficient segments that ould in 2020,
LOS E or F in 2020 are listed on pages 4.3-36 and 4.3-37 of the General Plan ate at
Thus, implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in potentially
EIR,
igni
s ficant and unavoidable traffic impacts. The proposed General Plan ob"ect
related to this issue minimize significant impacts to the maximum extent practicaiv%wa
All tratraffic
c impacts to other roadway segments would bible.
e mtigated to less t
significant levels. than
Findings
1• Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2• The traffic volume impacts to 41 roadway segments within the City have been
reduced to the extent feasible (refer to pages 4.3-36 and 4.3-37 of the General Plan
Statement of Facts and Findings 21 necewbeal§3
Resolution No. 04004089
Page 34 of 100 .:-. .
CARSON GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 11 W I
6
EIR). However, after implementation of Policies included •�`�
Plan, the impacts would constitute significant and unavoidable e Proposed General
impacts to roadway segments have been determined to be less t an significant with
implementation of the aforementioned policies.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The traffic volumes impacts to 41 roadway segments within the Ci
i
s
gniticant despite the implementation of available proposed Ge n eral Pl n ty main
and mitigation measures. poli c ies
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: TI-1,1, T1.1,2, T1. . ' - T1-2,11
TI-2-22 TI-2.3, 1I-2.4, T -2.5, TI-2.6, II-2.7, TI-2.8, TI-3.1, TT-3.2, T1�3*31 fn"142 T5.1,
1I-6.2,TI-6.3, II-6.4 and T-6.5.
Additional Policies to be Included in the Proi3osed General Plan:
Transportation and Infrastructure Element of the proposed General Plan �C
address the application of Intelligent Trans portation Systems (171 and shall
Maximum Feasible Intersection Concept. poli cies regarding these e the
transportation improvements shall be formulated and incorporated into S the
Transportation and Infrastructure Element.
M In addition to the policies listed above,
Mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts, the following
MM-TI-1 Any development project application that would enerate
more peak hour trips shall conduct a traffic impact analysis that will
assess project and cumulative impacts on the local roadway system
and at key intersections in Carson and adjacent communities. The
traffic impact analysis shall be in accordance with City of Carson
requirements for traffic studies and shall be submitted for review by
the City Traffic Engineer. The study shall identify all potential
project impacts and shall identify feasible mitigation measures, The
project shall either commit to implementation of the identified
mitigation measures, or shall pay afair-share fee towards the
implementation of the improvements. The City traffic engineer shall
41
make the final determination of the appropriate level of fair share of
improvements. In addition, a Congestion Management Program
CCMIP"') study shall be conducted according to Los Angeles County
CMP standards. Certificate of Occupancy shall not be approved
until the mitigation requirements have been met to the satisfaction
act on
of the City.
2• The overriding social,economic, and other considerations set forth in
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives tatement
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant p
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acce tabwhen
balanced against the facts set forth therein. p
December 2003 29
Statement of Facts and findinos
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 35 of 100
CARSON GFXMAL FUW NVIRONNUTAL IMPACT-REPINT
B. 88K1MN@YWffV top UMMIS
S1GNIF1CAhTAND UNAVOID"IXIMPACTAFTER MITIGATION
I. Traffic/Circulation - Consistency with CMP Standards. Implementation of the
proposed General Plan may result in the exceedance of LOS standards established
by the CMP at Carson freeway monitoring locations. Development activity related
to implementation of the proposed General Plan would affect the regional
transportation facilities in addition to the transportation system within Carson. In
particular, the freeway system would be used for regional access for all types of
development in the city. Implementation of the proposed General Plan would result
six freeway ramps in the AM or PM peak hours would have increases of 0.02 or
more in demand to capacity with a resulting Level of Service of F. Thus,
implementation of the General Plan would result in inconsistencies with the CMP
standards. Therefore, potentially significant and unavoidable traffic impacts would
occur in this regard. The proposed General Plan objectives related to this issue
minimize significant impacts to the maximum extent practicable,
Findings
I. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. The traffic volume impacts to 41 roadway segments within the City have been
reduced to the extent feasible (refer to pages 4.3-36 and 4.3-37 of the General Plan
EIR). However, after implementation of policies included in the proposed General
Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The impacts to the CMP standards remain significant despite the implementation of
available proposed General Plan policies.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:TI-6.1,TI-6.2, TT-6.3 and TI-6.4.
2. The overriding social, economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
Statement at Facts and Findings 38 DIC901ber2813
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 36 of 100 - . ...
ca�aoN GENEW ruin ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
C. CONM9MON W1=8MS
SIGNIF'CAW kVD UNAVOIDABLE IWACTAffER MITIGATION
1. Air Quality - Construction Emissions. Citywide construction activity under the
proposed General Plan may result in a cumulatively considerable increase of criteria
pollutants, and thus, may violate air quality standards. Development anticipated in
the proposed General Plan includes new development, redevelopment and
construction of infrastructure. Short-term impacts to air quality would occur during
the related grading and construction activities. Although the City enforces
continuing and concerted efforts to minimize pollutant emissions during
construction, short-term air quality impacts would be significant and unavoidable.0 The proposed General Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant
impacts to the maximum extent practicable.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been
adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.
3• The impacts in regards to construction emissions have been reduced to the extent
feasible. However, after the implementation of the policies contained in the
proposed General Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant and unavoidable
impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
I. The proposed General Plan's impact in regards to construction emissions remains a
significant impact despite the implementation of the policies contained in the
proposed General Plan.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: AQ-1.1, AQ-1.3, TI-1.1, SAF-4-1 and OSC.-
2.3.
2. The overriding social, economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
December 2083 31 Statement 91 FNCIS and fludin s
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 37 of 100
'00 CARSON GENERAL PLAY EXVIRINMENTAL IMPACT 1089T
M.
a MOLE M��n���ar�no�rao sin
SIGNIFICAATAND UNAVOIDABLkIMPACTAITERM
ITIATION
1•
Air Quality- Vehicle Miles T
r
aye,
ed and Stationary Source E
associated with implementation of the proposed General Plan would result
overall increase in mobile and stationary source emissions within an
would exceed SCAQMD air quality standards. Currently, the Ci s mobil � W�ch
air emissions exceed the South Coast Air Q uality Management District's thre source
Cumulative air p ollution impacts from implementation of the proposed Ge olds.
Plan are considered significant because future development projects would generate neral
emissions of criteria pollutants (reactive organic gases, nitrogen oxides, and �
monoxide)within an area designated as non-attainment for these pollutants. Local
efforts to minimize air quality emissions would still result in si 'ficant unavoidable impacts on a cumulative level after mitigation. The proposed General
Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts to them maximum
extent practicable. mum
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental mental effect a hid Project
in the General Plan EIR. entitied
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction o public agency and not the agency making the R nding. Such changes have n been er
adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other
a en
g cy.
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations
provision of employment , including
p yment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible
the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR.
4• The impacts in regards to vehicles miles traveled and stations source emissions
have been reduced to the extent feasible. However,after the imrlementation�sions
policies contained in the proposed General Plan, the impacts would constitutthe
significant and unavoidable impact. e a
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The proposed project9s impact in regards to vehicles miles traveled and ionary
source emissions remains a significant impact despite the implementation of the
policies contained in the proposed General Plan.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:
Mobile Source Reduction: AQ-2.4. AQ-2-5, AQ--2-69 AQ-2-7 AQ. 9 AQ-3-2 AQ.
4.1,AQ-4.2,LU-6-2,LU-6-3.LU-8-3, LU-15.1, LU-15.2. LU-15.5, LU-15.8 TI-4.1, ' _
4.2,1'I-4.3,TI-5.1 and'I'I-5.2. IZ
Statement of facts and Findings 32 December 2103
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 38 of 100 : . ._ .
CARSON GENERAL FIAN ENVININMENTU IMPACT REPORT
5
w
Stati ary Source Emission Reduction: AQ-1-2.AQ-5,17 AQ-5.2, LU-154,91 LU-15.10,
LU-15.11,OSC-11, OSC-3.Z OSC-3,-3-
and OSC-3.4.
2. The overriding social,economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining,unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
E TUMC NOISE
SIGNIFICAWkVD UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTAFTER MITIGATION
I. Noise - Traffic Noise. Future traffic noise levels associated with implementation of
the proposed General Plan may contribute to an exceedance of the City's noise
standard resulting in potential noise impacts to sensitive receptors. The projected
noise increase from motor vehicles would result in significant and unavoidable
impacts on 66 roadway segments within the City. The significant and unavoidable
impacts would occur on the following roadways: Gardena Boulevard, Albertoni
Street, Victoria Street, University Drive, Del Amo Boulevard, Torrance Boulevard,
Carson Street, 223' Street, Sepulveda Boulevard, Lomita Boulevard, Figueroa
Street, Broadway, Main Street, Avalon Boulevard, Central Avenue, Wilmington
Avenue, Alameda Street and Santa Fe Avenue. The proposed General Plan
objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts to the maximum extent
practicable.
Findings
I. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Impacts associated with traffic noise have been reduced to the extent feasible.
However, after implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General
Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The proposed project's impacts associated with traffic noise remain significant
despite the implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General Plan.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: N-1.1, N-1.2,N-1.3, N-2.1, N-2.2,N-2.3,N-
2.4,N-2.5, N-2.6,N-2.7, N-3.2,N-3.3,N-3.4, N-4.1,N-4.2, N-4.3,N-7.2,N-7.3 and N-
7.4.
2. The overriding social, economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
December 2003 33
Statement of Facts and�iadin�s
Resolution No. 04-0089
Page 39 of 100
CARSeN GENERAL PU'N E'MRONMWAL IMPACT REPORT
Ott
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
F. MULBOM NOISE
S1GMFIC.4hT,ffD UNA VOMABLE 1AVACTAnER MITIGATION
1. Noise - Railroad Noise. Future operation of railways would be a significant noise
source to land uses located in Carson. The projected noise increase from railroads
would result in significant and unavoidable impacts from railroad uses along the
Alameda Corridor to adjacent land uses within the City. The proposed General
Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant
extent practicable. impacts to the maximum
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Impacts associated with railroad noise have been reduced to the extent feasible.
However, after implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General
Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The proposed project's impacts associated with railroad noise remain significant
despite the implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General Plan.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: N-1.1, N-
5.2 and N-5.3.
2. The overriding social,economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
�.
81miNUTE MMON
SIGNIFICANT A1yD UNAVOIDABLE jMpACT AFTER MITIGATION
1. Hydrology and Drainage_Groundwater De lin
Develo
impacts hproposeGeneral Plan would create unavoidable significant related to d
depletion. These impacts are primarily based on the premise that the ersuat ppl
for the City of Carson and the Southern California region is constrained.
Implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in increased water
Statement of Facts end Findings 34 BIC903b8f 2003
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 40 of 100 .,,. ..
CARSON GENERAL FIAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
fi
demand. Although measures related to water conservation would be implemented,
it is anticipated that these impacts would remain unavoidable and significant. The
proposed General Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts
to the maximum extent practicable.
Findings
1. Changes or _alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
9%9%
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Impacts associated with groundwater depletion have been reduced to the extent
feasible. However, after implementation of the policies contained in the proposed
General Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
I. The proposed project's impacts associated with groundwater depletion remain
significant despite the implementation of the polici
General Plan. es contained in the proposed
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: LU-15.10, OSC-2.4, OSC-2.5, OSC-2.6 and
OSC-2,7,
2. The overriding social, economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings,, Any remaining,unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
IL A00188ffAL RELEASE OF nals loin mirms
S'GN'FICAATAND UNAVOIDABLE IWACTAFTER MITIGATION
1• Public Health and Safety — Accidental Release of Hazardous Material
s. Accidental
release of hazardous materials used,stored or transported in the City may result in a
public health risk. While oversight by the appropriate agencies and compliance with
applicable regulations minimizes the chance of accidental release of h zardous
materials in the City, the potential for accidental releases is inherent to industrial
uses. The greatest probability for a major hazardous materials incident is from a
transportation accident. Although the City enforces continuing and concentrated
efforts to minimize the potential for accidental release of hazardous materials, such
impacts are considered significant and unavoidable. The proposed General Plan
objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts to the maximum extent
practicable.,
December 2163 35 Statement of Facts and Fludlovs
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 41 of 100 . . .
�u
CARSON GENBW PLAN ENVIRONNEXTAL WFACT RETORT
tabn�
Findings
1. Changes.or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials have been
reduced to the extent feasible. However, after implementation of the policies
contained in the proposed General Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant
and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The proposed project's impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous
materials remain significant despite the implementation of the policies contained in
the proposed General Plan.
Policies in the Proosed General Plan: LU-7.3, SAF-4.1, SAF-3.1, SAF-3.2, SAF-
..4 SAF-4.2.SAF-43,SAF-4-4, SAF-4,5,SAF-4,6 SAF-4-8 and AQ-5.2.
2. The overriding social,economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
i. All T8198 Minion
SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IWACTAiTER MITIGATION
1. Public Health and Safety—Air Toxic Em issions. Development of the City of Carson in
accordance with the proposed General Plan may result in additional sources of air
toxic emissions, potentially increasing exposure of residents and employees to air
toxins. While oversight by the appropriate agencies and compliance with applicable
regulations minimizes the release of air toxic emissions in the City, the potential for
air toxic emissions is inherent to industrial/commercial uses. Although the City
enforces continuing and concentrated efforts to minimize air toxic emission impacts,
such impacts are considered significant and unavoidable. The proposed General
Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts to the maximum
extent practicable.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
Statement of Facts and findings 36
Becemker2183
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 42 of 100 ... .,:
CARSON GENERAL PIAN EMBONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
2. Impacts associated with air toxic emissions have been reduced to the extent feasible.
However, after implementation of the policies and recommended miti gation
measures contained in the proposed General Plan, the impacts would constitute a
significant and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
1. The proposed project's impacts associated with air toxic emissions remain significant
despite the implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General Plan,
as well as the recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan
EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan:SAF-4.3 and AQ-5.1.
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the following
mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce any impacts.
MM-PHS-1 Prior to new development, the development site should be
thoroughly assessed for the possible presence of contaminated
materials. The level of inquiry should be commensurate with the
current and former activities of a particular site. Where site
contamination is identified, an appropriate remediation strategy
should be implemented prior to project approval. The
remediation activities shall be performed by qualified and
licensed professionals in the particular problem identified and all
work shall be performed under the supervision of the
appropriate regulatory oversight program.
2. The overriding social, economic, and.other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining,unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
L OILCONTMIRTION
SIGNIFICAM"D UNAVOID"IXIMPACTAFTER MITIGATION
1. Public Health and Safety- Oil Contamination. Development in accordance with the
proposed General Plan may pose a health or safety hazard as a result of the existing
oil facilities. While oversight by the appropriate agencies and compliance with
applicable regulations minimizes the risk of oil contamination in the City, the
potential for oil contamination exists in the numerous active,idle and abandoned oil
wells throughout the City. Furthermore, other oil and gas related facilities, exiting
and abandoned, such as pipelines, sumps, and oil and gas treatment facilities within
the City that could impact existing and future development. Although the City
enforces continuing and concentrated efforts to minimize oil contamination impacts,
such impacts are considered significant and unavoidable. The proposed General
December 2003 37 Statement of Facts and Findlogs
Resolution No. 04-089
.-Page 43 of 100
CARSON GENERAL PIAN ENVIA INMWAL IMPACT REPORT
Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts to the maximum
extent practicable.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,which avoid or substantially lessen the signifi cant environmental effectas identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Impacts associated with oil contamination have been reduced to the extent feasible.
However, after implementation of the policies and recommended mitigation
measures contained in the proposed General Plan, the impacts would constitute a
significant and unavoidable impact.
Facts in Support of Findings
L The proposed project's impacts associated with oil contamination remain si ificant
despite the implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General Plan,
as well as the recommended mitigation measures identified in the General Plan
EIR.
Policies in the Proposed General Plan: SAF-4.1., SAF-4.2, SAF-4.3. LU-1.1 LU-1.4,LU-1.5 and LU-7.5. , LU-13,
Mitigation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the followin
mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts, g
MM-PHS-2 Prior to new development, the development site should be
thoroughly assessed for the possible resence of contaminated
materials. The level of inquiry should be commensurate with the
current and former activities of a particular site. Where site
contamination is identified, an appropriate remediation strategy
should be implemented prior to project approval. The
remediation activities shall be performed by qualified and
licensed professionals in the particular problem identified and all
work shall be .performed under the supervision of the
appropriate regulatory oversight program.
MM-PHS-3 If any structure is to be placed over or in close proximity to a
previous
ly plugged or abandoned oil or gas well, the well may
need to be re-abandoned and the surrounding area remediated
in accordance with current regulation. All activities related the
abandonment or re-abandonment will need to be approved by
the California Department of Conservation Division of Oil and
Gas.
MM-PHS-4 If applicable, project applicants shall complete the State of
California, Department of Conservation information packet
entitled, Construction Project Site Review and Well
Statement of Facts and Findings 38
December 2103
Resolution No. 04-089
_ Page 44 of -100 ..__... _ . .._
CARSON GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REIRT
9+
Abandonment Procedure, for submittal and review by the
Department.
MM-PHS-S Unless underground utili ty locations are well documented, as
determined by ' the City of Carson Engineering Services
Department, the project applicant shall perform geophysical
surveys prior to excavations to identify subsurface utilities and
structures. Pipelines or conduits which may be encountered
within the excavation and graded areas shall either be relocated
or be cut and plugged according to the applicable code
requirements,
2. The overriding social, economic, and other considerations set forth in the Statement
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives provide
additional facts in support of these findings. Any remaining, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acceptable when
balanced against the facts set forth therein.
L UNBRUS
SIGNIFICAWAND UNAVOID"MIWACTAITER MITIGATION
1• Public Health and Safety—Landfills. Development in accordance with the proposed
General Plan may pose a health or safety hazard as a result of the existing landfills.
While oversight by the appropriate agencies and compliance with applicable
regulations minimizes the risk of landfill hazards in the City, the potential for
landfill hazards exists in the City's 15 inactive sanitary landfills. Potential sources of
concern for risk of upset include the buried waste, groundwater and landfill gases.
Other problems with the landfills may include the production of organic gases
associated with decomposition and the production of leachates. At several of the
landfills, the composition of waste materials is not known. Since existing and future
hazards associated with the landfills have not been completely identified and
monitored, impacts from landfills are considered significant and unavoidable. The
proposed General Plan objectives related to this issue minimize significant impacts
to the maximum extent practicable.
Findings
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the General Plan EIR.
2. Impacts associated with landfills have been reduced to the extent feasible., However,
after implementation of the policies and recommended mitigation measures
contained in the proposed General Plan, the impacts would constitute a significant
and unavoidable impact.
December 2003 39 Statement of Facts and Findings
Resolution No. 04"-089
Page 45 of 100
CARSON GENOW F'AN ENVIRONHWAL IMPACT REPORT
NORM
Facts in Support of Findings
1• The proposed project's impacts associated with landfills remain si nificant de '
the implementation of the policies contained in the proposed General Pla spite
as the recommended mitigation measures identified in the General P EIR,�' � Well
lan
Policies in the Pro osed General Plan: SAF.4-2. SAF-43, LU-1.1, LU-1.2, LU4,3
LU-1.4.LU-1.5 and LU-7.5,
Mig&ation Measures: In addition to the policies listed above, the followin
Mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce any impacts, g
MM-PHS-6 A landfill gas protection plan prepared by a licensed Civil
Engineer will be required
permits. prior to the issuance of building
MM-PHS-7 Future development projects involving post-closure land uses on
closed or inactive landfill sites shall be reviewed and approved by
the local enforcement agency, the Los Angeles County SWMp, if
it places structures within 1,000 feet of the disposal or on top of
waste, or it is involves the modification of the low permeability
layer or irrigation over waste, pursuant to California Code of
Regulations, Title 27, Section 21190.
Also, refer to Mitigation Measures MM-PHS-2 and MM-PHS-4.
2. The overriding social,economic,and other considerations set forth in the State
of Overriding Considerations and in the Findings regarding Alternatives
additional facts in support of these findings. An remaini provide
y ng, unavoidable significant
effects after available General Plan policies are implemented are acce table when
balanced against the facts set forth therein. P
Statement of facts and Findings 40
December 2003
R 04-089
Page 46 of 100
CARSON GENEW PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
via ALMIMMS TO TNE pg9p88M PROJECT
The General Plan EIR addresses the environmental effects of alternatives to the
proposed project. A description of these alternarives, a comparison of their
environmental impacts to the proposed project, and the City's,findings are listed below.
L 1!0 PROJECT/NO 0111L0 JUTUMIM
The No Project/No Development Alternative would maintain the status quo of existing
land use conditions and levels of development in the City of Carson, with no additional
development permitted. Land use designations under the No Project/No Development
Alternative would be identical to those under the existing General Plan. Any
development that would occur as part of implementation of the proposed General Plan
would not occur under this Alternative. By definition, this alternative prohibits issuance
of building permits for new residential units or additional non-residential square
footage.
Findings
The City hereby finds that specific economic, social or other considerations make this
alternative feasible for the reasons noted in the following paragraphs.
The No Project/No Development Alternative would result in no change to the existin
conditions within the City of Carson. Therefore, no new or additional environmental
impacts would result directly from this Alternative. However, the No Project/No
Development Alternative would prevent the City of Carson from making needed
improvements to existing properties, infrastructure, and public services. Existing
conditions,under this Alternative would be maintained,but not improved.
Although the No Project/No Development Alternative fails to accomplish the project
objectives, it would avoid significant unavoidable impacts of the proposed General Plan
with respect to traffic/circulation, air quality, noise, hydrology and drainage, public
services and utilities, and public health and safety given that no additional development
would be permitted. Thus, the No Project/No Development.Alternative is considered
environmentally superior to the proposed General Plan.
The findings of the proposed project set forth in this document and the overriding
social, economic and other issues set forth in the. Statement of Overriding
Considerations provide support for the proposed project and the elimination of this
alternative from further consideration.
118COMber 2083 41 StAIGMent of Facts and Findings
Resolution No. 04---089
Page 47 of 100 _. .
C AN seN GF MERFUEININMW WAL IMPACT REPORT
e.
891MN8 9gan IqM ATUUTM
The Existing General Plan Alt ernative assumes that ultimate buildout of the
General Plan would occur. The Existing General_ Plan fisting
geographic area as that in the proposed General Plan. However, he o osed General
same
Plan recommends revisions to the Existing General Plan. P p
would update existing conditions with year 2000/2001 serving as the bed General Plan
would provide projections for population, employment, residential development
and
non-residential development for the year 2020. The proposed General Plan would
l
establish building intensities for commercial, industrial and institutional land d
categories in addition to creating a new Land Use Policy Map, In addition, use
proposed General Plan would separate Public Facility uses into three land the
designations: 1) Public and Institutional Uses, 2) General Open S e designation) and 3) Recreational Open Space (new desi anon),
Park/Limited Industrial and Mixed Use land use designations would be crea Business
proposed General Plan would make necessary additions, de letions or modifications to
the existing General Plan G oals, Policies and Implementation Programs,, oAlternative assumes that the Existin utd
g Gene ral Plan would continue to provide o
information regarding several issues,. such as City traffic conditions, land use ated
community noise Ievels and air quality data. In addition, the Existing General Plan would not include the changes or modifications noted above or detail ed in Section
Project Description,of this EIR. 3.0,
Findings
The City hereby finds that specific economic, social or other considerations
alternative feasible for the reasons noted in the foll
owin paragraphs, �make e his
g
Implementation of this Alternative assumes that ultimate bui Out of the
moting
General Plan would occur. The Existing General Plan encom asses the
E
geographic area, but includes different buildout "p roections than the proposed Genera e
Plan. The Existing General Plan has a planning horizon year of 20009 while 1
proposed General Plan has a planning horizon year of 2020. The proposed General
Plan proposes an increase of acres designated for residential use and commercial use
with a decrease in the amount of acres designated for industrial uses. In addition
proposed General Plan establishes building intensities for commercial, industrial and
institutional land uses.
The Existing General Plan Alternative would result in similar environmental impacts all issues, except for land use. It is anticipated that the Exi for
result in greater land use incompatibility Stag General Plan would
impacts than the proposed General Plan. In
conclusion, the Existing General Plan Alternative is not considered environmentall
superior when compared to the proposed General Plan. Y
The findings of the proposed project set forth in this document and the overriding
social, economic and other issues set forth in the Statement of overriding
Considerations provide support for the proposed project and the elimination of thi
alternative from further consideration. S
Statement of Facts and Findings 42
December 2113
Resolution No. 04-W-089
Page 48 of 100 _ .
CARSON GENERK PIAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Modified Plan 1- Alternative C proposes a different development scenario for the
amount of acreage dedicated to residential, commercial, and industrial land uses (refer
to Table 3-3,in Section 3.0,Project Description, of this EIR and Exhibit S-1.Altemative C
Land Use Plan),, However, the addition of two new land use designations including
Business Park/Limited Industrial and Mixed Use and the refinement of uses within the
Public Facilities designation, which includes separating the uses into three land use
designations, remains the same under this Alternative. Additionally, the amount of
acres dedicated to the three new Public Facilities designations would be the same as in
the proposed General Plan.
Alternative C provides for additional Low Density Residential (12 acres), but reduces
the amount of acreage dedicated to Medium Density (13.1 acres) and High Density(1.7
acres) residential uses. Alternative C does provide for an increase in total commercial
land uses by 26.6 acres. General Commercial uses would increase by 139 acres and
Regional Commercial Uses would increase by 118.4 acres when compared to the
proposed General Plan. However, the amount of acres designated Mixed Use would
total 16.2 acres, which is 230.8 acres less than that in the proposed General Plan.0
Finally, acreage designated for industrial Land uses would be lower than that in the
proposed General Plan. Business Park uses would be equivalent to that designated in
the proposed General Plan at 153.2 acres. S pecifically, the Business Park designation is
recommended for Carson Town Center, located in Study Area No. 6. However, there
would be 16.7 more acres of Light Industrial uses and 40.5 fewer acres of Heavy
Industrial uses proposed in Alternative C as compared to the proposed General Plan.
As mentioned earlier, the amount of acres designated Recreational Open Space (3160 5
acres), General Open Space (284.5 acres) and Public Facilities (587.4 acres) are the
same as that in the proposed General Plan.
Findings
The City hereby finds that specific economic, social or other considerations make this
alternative feasible for the reasons noted in the following paragraphs.
The Modified Plan 1 —Alternative C would result in similar environmental impacts to
the proposed General Plan for all environmental issues. Implementation of this
Alternative does not eliminate significant transportation/circulation, air quality, noise,
hydrology and drainage,public services and utilities,or public health and safety impacts.
Thus, Modified Plan 1—Alternative C is not considered environmentally superior to the
proposed General Plan.
The findings of the proposed project set forth in this document and the overriding
social, economic and other issues set forth in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations provide support for the proposed project and the elimination of this
alternative from further consideration.
December 2803 43 3131003601 of Facts and findings
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 49 of- loo . . .
r CARSON GENEW FIAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RRONT
a 9881FIN PLAN Y_IuMUnrE e
As with Alternative C and the proposed General Plan, the development scenario for
Modified Plan 2 - Alternative D would include the addition of two new land use
designations including Business Park/Limited Industrial and Mixed Use and the
refinement of uses within the Public Facilities designation,which includes separatin the
uses into three land use designations, g
Alternative D designates a total of 38.4 less acres for residential use. This Alternative
provides for a decrease of 19.6 acres for Low Density Residential, a decrease of 14.9
acres for Medium Density Residential and a decrease of 3.9 acres of High Density
Residential compared to the proposed General Plan. There would be an increase of
49,8 acres for Regional Commercial uses and an increase of General Commercial by
63.9 acres,resulting in a total decrease of 34.3 acres for commercial uses. The decrease
in acres designated for residential uses and commercial uses would result in a higher
amount of acres designated for industrial uses. While there would be a decrease of 0.7
acres for Business Park uses and a decrease of 298.7 acres designated for Light
Industrial Uses, there would be an increase of 382.1 acres designated for Heavy
Industrial. The Business Park designation is recommended for the Village Center
located in Study Area No. 2. The amount of acres dedicated for Recreational Open
Space, General Open Space and Public Facilities would remain the same as that in he
proposed General Plan. Refer to Exhibit 5-2.Alternative D Land Use Plan.
man
Findings
The City hereby finds that specific economic, social or other considerations make this
alternative feasible for the reasons noted in the foll owing paragraphs.
The Modified Plan 2-Alternative D would result in similar environmental impacts the proposed General Plan for all environmental issues. Implementation of this
Alternative does not eliminate significant transportation/circulation, air quality, noise,
hydrology and drainage,public services and utilities,or public health and safety impacts.
Thus,Modified Plan 2-Alternative D is not considered environmentally superior to the
proposed General Plan.
The findings of the proposed project set forth in.this document and the overriding
social, economic and other issues set forth in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations provide support for the proposed project and the elimination of this
alternative from further consideration.
Statement of Facts and Findings qq December 2 03
Resolution No.- 04-089 .
Page 50 of 100
EXHIBIT"B"
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(see Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program following this
page)
Resolution No, 04--089
Page 51 .0f .100
CARSON GENURL PLAN IN'ACT AE�08T
STATENER OF OVERIBING CON
SIN
1. INTRODUCTION
The Environmental Q uality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines provide
in part the following:
a) CEQA requires that the decision maker balance the benefits of a proposed
project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to
approve the project. If the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects
may be considered"acceptable."
b) Where the decision of the public agency allows the occurrence of significant
effects that are identified in the General Plan EIR but are not mitigated, the
agency must state in writing the reasons to support its action based on the
General Plan EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement may
be necessary if the agency also makes the finding under Section 15091 (a)(2)(a)(3)of the CEQA Guidelines. or
C) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement
should be included in the record of the project approval and should be
mentioned in the Notice of Determination (Section 15093 of the CEQA
Guidelines).
The City Council, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the
General Plan EIR for the project, Responses to Comments and the public record,
adopts the following Statement of Overriding Considerations that have been balanced
against the unavoidable adverse impacts in reaching a decision on this project.
SIGNIFICANT Y0IDABLEMYEISE 19FA6U
Although all potential project impacts have been substantially avoided or mitigated as
described in the preceding findings, there is no complete mitigation for 12 project
impacts:
A. Traffic/Circulation - 2020 Traffic Volumes/Roadway Capacities on 41 roadway
segments, including three roadway segments which currently operate at an
unacceptable service level under existing conditions;
B. Traffic/Circulation—Consistency with CMP Standards;
C. Air Qua —Construction Emissions;
D. Air Oualiix-Vehicles Miles Traveled and Stationary Source Emissions;
E. Noise -Traffic Noise;
F. Noise_Railroad Noise;
G. HvdLologLand Drainage—Groundwater Depletion;
December 2013 1 Statement at Onffiding Considerations
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 52 of I00
CARSON GENEW PUN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
MtYM.�
H. Public Health and Safetv—Accidental Release of Hazardous Materials;
I. Public Health and Safetv..Air Toxic Emissions;
J• Public Health and Safety—Oil Cont amination;and
K. Public Health and Safety—Landfills.
Details of these significant unavoidable adverse impacts were discussed in the Plan EIR and are summarized, or were otherwise provided in Section V, En vironment
Effects Which Remain Significant and Unavoidable After Mitigation, in the Statement of
Facts and Findings.
111. EFFEMBETUNINUTONE LESS TNA�I SIGNIFICANT
To the extent that the significant effects of the project are not avoided or substantiall
lessened to below a level of significance, City Council, having reviewed and considered
the information contained in the General Plan EIR and the public recor(, and havin
balanced the benefits of the project against the unavoidable effects which remain, finds
that such unmitigated effects to be acceptable in view of the follo c onsiderations. win g overridin g
1• The project's implementation will help ensure orderly, inte
compatible development in response to existing conditions and .
ongo n local
and regional trends, g
2• The project will maintain the City's long-term viability and productivity through
a managed growth plan as opposed to allowing pecemeal i benefit of short-te gain. development for t
rm
3• The project complies with State IN o f California Planning Law by providing a
comprehensive, long
-term general plan for the physical development" of he
City (Government Code Section 65300) comprised of an "integrated, in ternall
consistent, and compatible statement of policies" (G overnment Code Section
65300.5).
4• The project complies with the State mandated provisions for Housing Elements
and sets forth a reasonable range of housing programs to address regional
housing needs.
5• The project provides policy direction to coordinate with surrounding cities and
the County of Los Angeles to reevaluate the need for regional street
improvements that may have potentially significant environmental effects
associated with them. Mutual agreement of the deletion of transportation.
related improvements will not jeopardize the City's eligibility for regional and
state funding programs.
6• The project's circulation system is consistent with the Congestion Management
Plan (Cmp) for Los Angeles County, the Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP)and the Regional Mobility Plan(RMP).
Statement of Overriding Considerauens 2
December Y003
Resolution No. 04--089
-Page 53 of I00 . .._.
CMSIM GENERAL MAN EXVININNEXTAL IN'pCT REPORT
7• The project provides a general framework for land use and infrastructure
development over the next 20 years, and has ensured that the two are
appropriately correlated. Individual components of the project will be subject of
additional environmental analyses and review, and if these individual J
are determined to be infeasible for either environmental,social and/or e onoects
reasons,appropriate amendments can be made to the General Plan. �c
8• The project, being a General Plan, where CEO A requires subsequent.9
discretionary project approvals before any physical change to natural havitat is
permitted, will not have any significant adverse effect
their habitat. on fish and wildlife, or
9• Implementation of the project will result in the reduction and elimination o
existing and projected environmental impacts in the following areas: f
Land Use
• Consistency with Relevant Federal and State Plans and Policies
• Consistency with Relevant Regional Plans and Policies
• Consistency with Relevant Local plans and Policies
• Land Use Compatibility
Population,Employment any Housing
� Population Growth
� Housing
• Employment
TransiDortatio-'X/Circulation
• Consistency with CMP,AQMP and RMP
• Alternate Transportation
Air Ouali!
• Consistency with Regional Plan
Noise
Construction Noise
� Aircraft Noise
• Stationary Noise
Geologic and Seismic Hazards
• Fault Rupture
• Seismic Ground Shaking
0 Liquefaction
• Landslides
• Soil Erosion
• Unstable or Expansive Soils
December 2803 3 State ment�to Yerridlag ClusidersUens
................
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 54 of 100
�u � CABS�M GENOW PlAli ENIIIBOMINENTAL IMPACT KPIAT
Hvdrolo,ev and Drainage
• Water Quality Standards and Waste Discharge Requirements
• Drainage and Runoff
• Flooding/Dam Inundation
Public Services and Utilities
0 Fire Protection
• Police Protection
• School Facilities
• Library Facilities
• Water
• Sewer Services
• Solid Waste
• Electricity
• Natural Gas
• Telephone
Parks., Recreation and Human Services
• Parkland and Recreational Facilities
Public Health and Safely
• Hazardous Materials Use,Generation and Transport
• Aircraft Overflight
• Rail Line Hazards
Cultural Resources
� Historic Structures or Resources
• Archaeological Resources
• Paleontological Resources
Disturbance to Human Remains
Aesthetics
• Visual Quality
• Light and Glare
Although significant impacts will remain, the City of Carson will mitigate any significant
adverse impacts to traffic/circulation, air quality, noise, hydrology and public health and safety to the maximum extent practicable. In it9 s, deci drain and
the project, the City Council of Carson has considered the project benefits to outwe� h
the environmental impacts. g
Statement of OvOffldlRg COUSIderaUens q
BICIMbW2183
Resolution No. 04-
089
Page 55 of 100
GUMS
a
a
E
0
CO
0
o D
0
Rlogo
OE
V
0 � V Q•8 0 CD
° o � E .S
� c
W
LL
C'
0
I ,� o
CL .0 E o
CD CL 0
....
CL
Z ' •C cu •�cr a. m
LU CM
O 00
LL c„
LL W c Q.
� cu �
Q o o ° U ' cu�
0
cl co
Z 'I=� > .U W 0
° a Z c •>C�W o Q - �c
ro-
�
LD c cv
V ? U 0 cu � a
Z c •`—" co
O O °
co cu
•_
Q a o •v_� ,cam c-� L.D U c
ia . cn rk Z%
mo Q. >
z CU CU
O c o 0 .c m U) a) _ o .Y U 0 CL 0 CL m
CD %ftftwov Cc CO
ftw� cn Q '� �- +..• -� 'C3 C C C to 4D 4)
CU CU 0 dm�
= W to E cn ` c" 0 O Om
W 0 u) E (D w 0 cu 5L
CU
M �+ ,E = ,C C try .0
0 0 0 A
E ION
0 8 U C.) CL cc
am 8 75 0 0 CL - 0 ie 2 CU
CL E cn
.... 2 `. L.. �.. cc
V V ,N v� a a-.� c •� 0 0 �-- C u)
c �. c�
0 cv •- ...., U :� 0 a�CL .0 0
0 .. :G cm (CS
•a c� H-- e 2 m 0 0 0 o 0 yr
0 0
0
m E CL o ` , c c c�c �c U
2
0
eam 0 E 0
c CC% c
.�
CD
cn
0 E 8
m cu E "cu 0 -0
� v
0
CL Lm
N
�-- N
Resolution No, 040100089
Page 56 of -100
O
o �
c �
,o
as �
a�
S v
_ ... O C cu C
O O ` O C!� e O � CO cn ` to
CL:... R� Q. Q� Z7 O � w �.. V3 �
tv p V O ....., c U Q..,c� � m a..
LL m o (D 0 `+- o ° � o cc a
> CO> Cn ° W C3� O O
V —' U
OV
•— U
LL •� —
m m
O •_
CL •— E o W O o E
CD CL.= O c m �- C a- ` v CL
Z 0 � ��- � .c •a cu � ,O � CD 610=Now Wa-
�, — =
"' v� "D
Z
O m m
an v,
CL W c •-- U) Q v, r
J co au m a) ca U o a. �, CL
.� c O V .> "- ca > m w-- co cu
Q c
0 2 cr .p —ca 2: 46-0� c o U �.. c p V .>
cl z 4.0 0 > CU ° > �'� � • RW c o v m a.0-00 a z 0 cm tia 0 c • c N
Q Q c Z �. C B
U V Q(' O CZ
t
�. c
Z — C/) •U) U Ca) O
0 a
0 •• w
Z > cu c c cu cu `- a -0 = C � � ° �
Q O C .o O O C •� .3 C V 0 0 = L
c�! �j c0 Cn. m
a awma -6-4 cu
.Z 0 •� O �...► CL .0 m 4. O ..a" �u ...... .....
0 Lu S2 .12.• a� aD -Q m. a. o •S 3 V
ea c cis .p `�' -0 E Rs 3 S .cv 4. •_
H- o a. ° o :>— as Gammon+o.. as c E
w , � .�.
Q
..mom C
cm E p� C D C .. p E -E V C a� O
Q ca 8 a� .o a 4V � cu � po (D O RS ,�->, UM) V amma Q ca O O C R `== Q a� CJy O U
.p � 4 -C c0 �.... C +"' O CU C V 410 CL 6 U)
0).�
CD C E C C
`=' � 2:% 0 > = Q � as � � C�. •t � > •'
(� OC Q cu � C .0 cl� w 0E.. C p �Q. 4� O
p cn m _ C Z7 V
a� o — o co a. c� E o o .o c Ommap CU
C.j •— v .— v- •� _ ova
�C to 0� CD >, c C� O cis cU c `. u C E CD a VMS
00-100 0 ea
CU Ommme
avow .0 C� •_ chi
) C O C O O �� L p O C
v� ,cn
Z C W `n
Q 0
V
r
C� tom' N /�/�
p •� U. _' `''J
J
0 U)E C/ Q Q
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 57 of -100y
LOW
E
._
SWISS
E
0
U CD
�
0
c �
.0
�o
•c
c
SMUMM
as
S
c .i o cu c .i.,
0 r0 � o � � � CD � C
o U o U
> O o(S
O •-
'-
U W p
cl a m
C' U)
O4w = .�.
._
C O O `0 �
0 u a. Q.
•
C
[� Z L .c .o cu cm
F-- Ce m CIS ccn ° Q. v v
Z ce m M as
0 ---- M
m
Q. t� a U) .c U)
LL W c v, a. = a) v,
cis () M U) rte.
p •> � O 0 M
Z � i -> > m c O � c .
W Q -E = c o C 0 C� > to C 0 M
0 cp CL.0 C "cn's •—C7 'c -co .-.v>W Q s
� Z o
a
Z � � to c cn
r
O
Z �.. C O v? C `V X41/ C: g
Q C o = C U 0 c0 � O O Q. � Q. p N E cu a v cn c tea V = cu c� -- E 6 c c a ammm
Z as 0 0 0 ,�, p E V $ c c .- 403
h E v a o.. �- -o o U o 0 a MUMMOM CS SGUIUM Q 0 3 ca v •`r' .o w . CD o C% 0
>% cn (n�a
co
Q S O o ca O
CU
.2:%as 1? to V cv ,.,., 8 c -v CU CD 66mm#
0 C O
0 O ,E.0
GUMS
8 O ca O .a-.o „ . .a • O 2 co m� � E v O
V O ° ca c • ca a cc u c c �o V>0
E 0 o � E (a o r cu cn�� •c
low. o E > �OOO-a as
Ca
•0 - •� v a � ° (n u - cn � o c au a`a ff cis c cts L
0
Oaa-0 cm CD co
in en CL _ CL
� � L
r C V? O 43 .� R� 2 '� Q O O � chi
cn m D CZ D UQ— C' C/)cLn a Cm
O c
�- O
.Slow
�o V... p U.a� � �- Q
W
CI- --
Resolution No. 0
Page'' 58 of 10 ,, .._}.
Man-
v a�
n�
0
V as
o �
c o
0
v� —
c
w
c ��.
to O � C/)O c O c
of
CL E c U o-.� c o f -v
co 4&WO
(n Q o
� � O � p O 2:�- �
Z% O •C O
� y0 Up -cv U._ 0 :o o �
-- p CL
LL. '� U)
c!) U) m .J
O .� =
0
tL •-- E >a, ' cn o` 8a. > cn o 0 C) o Oc m o � v
0-�
W F-- C. cn co -- tt's c m W Z O
a' c
a- a- c *
nn
0 °D CD
a- W c U) a = O
J o U .> �•.._ cu o cv�
p •c ter o - � � c oU >
O
Z as -.� c�> .00-0, c p
� v o ~cv c •o- v �
W Q c
0 0) ._ C o O o
W 0 � ._ oQ CL
� c � 'c
U a. a� v c 'v a.
? - U ca o Q . �
�.... c •� C/) U •� cu
Z O D c CO
0 cn - a� - v
�I
•0 = O o .0 c cu •�
43 Q O i--- c v &0 a. cts O E
Z v •�, :� cn Q- rn
� c c p
O •_ ••_ .o O •c
O w �/
�, U `- co C
o Q
cn
'0 66 >% g -6 0
a CL' o 8 c �
� � o o c
o �-' o c - .0 An a 8 Saw p p c M v
i c �� •
c
cu _ O M tD ca .c 'p cu cn
o .c cv 3 -v c v •'�
o` o
.c to c 3 .� 4..
0 cu � ,c °� •tv o � � c c
C= CL M CL CL M
O Cn v w O ,p ,� W3: a_
_ = > CU p ca C7 = O o
O co O
cn 0 O •� O c V cn v0 _0 � � E CU
c cn o ._ ._ co
C p O p c � c n �v Q-
U_ -ca 0) cn c� cn cu C13� M c �- o
ci. Z r,., - -a C
Lt d U)
LM >- .a:'
O O ama
co O
SIMON LL J !'
M Q O Of 0
_b" _
Resolution Now 04-089
Page 59 of 100
a
0
o
C o
0
•w
C
C -� O c m ° ° .C c c O cn L.
�a.. V a.. a� cu E a a O
0 O m j V a- c
a.. -�` 4) Cn •C C Cl-.0 > 4� cm cu 1=
._. Q
m O • O Cn .C C C1.-O
•`.. V •� spa" UO ° Q otl.
93L as O •� O
4 .�
�. •- > to O O O .? O
0 a� ` o CL >
(' o Cl! O c Cm
0.. .c M O c �
Z 0 0 c C m ..... o .0 c
W !— 0 Cl' c vv co CL CL n �o
0� m - m
CL Lm L1. t a cn(n m r= 0 cn
C" CD .�,- cu cu cn Q
J c c O V .> ,� cu aD cu
C3 o- o — � � C ° V ♦—�. 2
Z ,o ` 'v > c c o u � c c
w Q '� � C o c o 'cn �' > ° c .0
a Z ,E 0 cu
(� F.•. c c C O Q `
U) = � cc°
• C/) .Z
C/)
o O p
i.
cu co
Z m E cu O Z7 C O O '� O O V U ^
.... c>Q : CT c LO-
Q O .C•- Q. 3 .5 Z O > w U
Cu cu
0 -9
CY) -4-w#
cr CC, (T .2 cp
cr = p to - a O O m ` +-0 M
> La)'U 0 O cu � .� to O t� � � O � � ca V O �
0-0 .2 u) ff
CL CU
0
0 amw C:
&sum cn-° Q to 'L7 6- C > � 5 to •� � cn -D 0 4M.4
0 C L O 0 �--,, 4� ca Cu c O cu a. }, L O cu m > v
o v o -4 a c f o-?t% o
_v a�
cu CL
E Q 0- 0- CU 0 70 m
O cu cu
.._
.0 - rn o a) c`ts c o cc�s c a) �a >, 'c �.
:+ '> •C nom' inl .. nom, nom' O 4 ` ,� ��� C •• '
/1 a� a� V
U CL C1 'Q t�U 0 S -C t13 .� 0 •0 CU cr
v1 to �. ..,.. O
N cn
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 60 of 100
E
CL
a
o
c C3
O
V
�- V)
C
w
of .� c �... .�? � .-•
ao� O co v U� a ao v O
� M O c
U c
p
-`cn
O 0 ` ` c o cu n '
U cu E (D O
O cu o cm cu
o 0 8 o, cu cv
0 .
0 a loom
CL�v U ..= � as
0 m ,° m 0
o
� �
It 4-- •�Z 8 a-0 4)� a� .v (n o o
�- > cn O CL
z CU CU
W F.- cu Q. a" ( Q. v
Z cn
i
0
a.
4
9! cc >ID U — � m-r cr q*.. c 0
� ° 2:%� C 4.
cl Z cu O
1j > u c O u > u C O� C O - C
co
Ui Z o Q c c ca. '0 o-
C.7 -- .� U c� w � ° Q o� c �
F-- cn U
Z OC c •-- cn cn
0 0 _" ,o C C] cn
cn .c tv m
� o •3 .c can � � � ._ o � � � � o C C
cL.. •--
'Q v, E c a c O O c`a. a ° V = cis �' •�
V :� •3 v o a�
CL o cz. o o, -v , o 0 cn o
Z as o. co > � E •- ca- •� CL v � �... �, c .o:=
Q o- O O cu c O O v Cn cu c .o L)
t0 O .0 to U C = O �.• O cu �.. O
O cu C C
CL O C CL
- , cD ... c.� .� gO 0
Q. M a O O N C L p o a � O O C >
= � oQ ° a cn
o �O o o►C> 0 0 ,o U) Cl. C .,C C.3 M W •f„ c_ O o O 4� C
§� -a E a) co
.� �.. y c 0 c a- 0 3 ° .> o cu .� t o cu " a v c cn
cn CU
...� — = o � Cz o � > a�
MIMS Z'3 .._. co c O O c O -
p $ C1 C N CZ �u cn�-.. O �,,,, C .0 •-CL -0 4.0 "D cr
Sommm a� c � a c _ c CY)00 U) Ca (1)cn cn cn 0-v CL cu c c`u z� c w o Q. o o a 6 a.' U 0
L.cu a -= 2 0 M
O to 'C1 a' C .� v) cu .a O T� C cn a
Co Q O
._.
L cn V (� C
' O O ,.,,; .?' O p O ca
-� C tp .� U Q""p 'U3 C �' O = C cn
o
to . c a. a t.� >_% O c
.c
OC
w co
co
�- c Q
_
C C =
0 •2 VON"
dM
_ Resolution No. 04_089
Page 61 o f 100
m
E
.m w CD
a
E
O
L)
4=4
0 m
c Q
0
loop
m
a�
=�? CM c
.�i-- •.` a .-�0 O I - O �• `� ,Clce cc.� a
C53 O C V co 10-0 En p°' O y-- 0 n
p � 0 -9 C .v E p CM p O O i �
0. 8 -S
CU h -0-0 .C 0 C D 0 v
�
C
CL � a 00 d o .� 0 a.
-0 '� � U VD
p .w ao J o`
Ix C 0 3
(L Q? cn
"C � •>` C
It z 4$Q.as
Lm
� V C
MUM MMI anow
Z a. o
0
a
0
d. Uj c U) �
J a� S� 4— m o a v? ..c v)
O � Ca �+ C o U .> cu Cc O cU
.� v > cu c o ,o - � ,� o U ,>
Q c 0 c 43 •a- v > c p C) CIO
LU .� c a •� ._ � Q O 1- c o •CIO
Ulm E
U v cu o ,� c Z, c •>
Z F.I c -� CIO 0 co -Q o `u c � °`*.waft CIO 0 ICU
CIO
0 0 CIO
co swam WD co
co .� `o
>. .a? 70 0 J o
CO aw-
CU 2 >
C: CIO
c� cu a� c .o .
8 Gomm.
ICU
cm GOGG, CM
C • 4� C .�., to
Q �O'` vii m v 0 Oftwaa,
3 a> >
> •10
>- v •� o C�
N- o o `' = o o cu v' Q as o
CL VIGGO 0-
ca E g
�... CT p ,o v� o o m o 0 cn U :C o
� C > 0 'C ,0 .0 = .0 O. Q2
C o .0 0 0 c/ o
.o o a`� a� � �'` o v
qaaaa X: GI
= fl..� 00 V C E •&
cn
O .0 _� �.,. O CT 4 3
O .0 O co a o c� C-0 C �-. cis N CIO
o 0 c.0 :+` O Ca U CZ V ♦... C done=y > ,c W •� C� c
_ �
CD _C6.� � ,.J CZ co 0_ cn
.O C _ CU -O .- a) E-- o ..-'
.0 O 'C � o � ` c C C 43 V
.c v -o Q o W .� p o E o cn
2)
Oaaaaa 0 co co .0 Q o .2 U .V :�CO
CIO ..._.
c - a� .,o V W a� �. co c .�
Gnaw� V � `a o .� Q D � �
W v
D m
TOW- U)
N 0 z -
Gomm u� m N
o ,D0 Q_ c�
s
d a � o
Resolut-ion -No"
Page 62 of 100 '
c a,
0
ti
o v
= o
0
m
ci
>
snow
c
m
vs c c ♦.. a�
C •`0 m 0 4
0I C/)
O O C maim
h � Q ul
i. Cu E
CD o `#.- o U C .8 - co c 6) C 4*40-00 cu
°
66IIIIIIII'D
LM �+ cQ O •--- a U 0 cc
cl) CL cu
a vQ _ a, c� 0.. ICY cQ
m v o CIO
o
C 3
E
°' O
CIO O a
W atr Q 8
aa
Z ce o� a =3 .c
0 a-
Ll„ v t
te ...
♦A ..
'� W co(D
•� C O O .� O Q;. � CIO U -
Z
gone �,,, v �, �' ..... C o cu �... cv > cu
oft"Z
dz 0 Cm cu
ui Ell -
O Q .� V C Q, = cv => 2 °C v w --
. co
a o,j o �0 �0 � �
�- �, C •v�
OC Z `� 0 CIO
cu C?
Cu
I_IIIIIIIIIIIo CU
—
` .Q o E 3 •� -t3 du Q-
swam C:
Q _ ca
C v a ,_� v , L CU •`� cII
40.0 cu 70
2 —� 0 .,now
Q E o a� 0 o CD O 0 .Q v,
.Q
i•s C °o •
o o `o
0 0
CU � O .O
'cu a
io cn o o
.0 o CO o ow•
0
L E
Cu co
4990 CD 0
w 70 Cu LE
•c au c = 0 -, CO o IV > o o .c
m
cm •C �� Q�j Z7 U. C F-- .� p p tU >
Gomm
>� v Q. .2 *0.,co t cu .C -Q O Q- =CII Q
ti} C V U v Q ` Q '� C E -O .0 O cu
O p .o CIO c p oc
CA
E
CIO
Q_ CIO V �--
�- .! O =
CO
Q.
Q �
ReSolutiOn
No. 04--0.89
Page 63 of 100
0
c
�a
-
E
0
WINNER M 0
0
as
N
c
-v
v •-• c
O •'.-
= ca
c c C
,r.,, O
a� =3 o o c o o .ca C •t •=
L
a.
0 0 cc Slow.
CC O t _ o `U�
O O 1. _ E O M' O 4c� ..c O
_U)O
td 2 Z a °- m a
O
p
Q o
cc
`�- .�
CL o
0 of o ° ao,.
o
(1)O CO v o � o.. o c C"
a: L v .c Cc c
CL ae som-
O •r •-
go"
�.. m -
OG Z a monow m
LU F- OG
OC � gE; �
� O �
._
W c � o v •.°� a } M
Q OC a' .o -- �a 0 c a.
--� Cr > ca 5 E c. .o mmm%C] O L .._. o o c .0 0- a
.'!� U. C]. . 0 Q V
LIJ Z O V N CD
SIMMONS 0
W C� •- c .- mom -
F-- .a o ,�
O 'L7 C RS
goo cc as (1) > 0
0 cc i6-cs
pQ V� 2 p ♦c c.• =,ca C0. o E �?► 6- %&.
Loom % .
°- 0 5 •w a v - -v a
O � 0 a. 0 r
o o � o
o CL 'wo CL. Cr anowim .0
0 *am"
Cc
-a 0 O c ca c _ O 0
CD E,, 0 Loa
• ` O U � E o c. O a a0 0 m , C Rf
CL a.Pom 4) -
; c Q O 4J L.. cz L o .0 C a� O
a o o a U
Cn N .o _ ac �0
CL o
•� � o- CO r „
c
Samoa
_ ? C. +-' O C ca com CIO 0
0 p
comma a..
loam, oamw
flumno .....
!d tom!) Cc 0 O ''? Q- '- C •
c!1 S. CO c p c 0 }+� -� E p
CCd c .D .O C1. to O p -0 ca
o �M Ch
>
. Y Ca o Law =3 C%3 O .0 c O cCf Slow,E a � Cc
0
CD CL
= CL
0
Resolution No. 04-089
_ __. �._ ._�.. Pa e 6 4 of _100 , _. ... �..... . _ _
g
° E
a o�
•w
E
O
0 0
c
0
�o
.o � .
d
'� t°i� 403 — p O c
O O •� c ` c
O cu m ��
c o '— o Z U o .._ a�
a O O ca cis O o 0 � ._
a c% CL v 0 >
L. 0 .� 0 V7 c
'� .�' O D p •— W
a
C� �
OC a� o O E
Od O ti-- a' O N `- V Q..
,Z m
O
A' W 4- c o ca � a� �-
.J � � � c OU ;� g oU .> �
O ,� ,. �...� c cc �` .•_. C o
W °
Z o as ° W
W ._ OQ c oQ � C a.
t� i-- .`.
_ 0
d _ —
0 o a� a� cn � a�
OC U - •-
Q D -cu CL .,Q ,a� .� o c o
o c�u °�' 8 ` '0
a� •� a`? Q
•_ p C
E cu 3 c . � ° = .c
Q p O .� cn
Q ca o v,
Q � = C O +-' �- C
Oc� ..._
C C � ,Q? �... C3 .�, � 0 � 0
}• o ° o o a
�` CIO o a- - O 8
c � '. 0 -v
Vcc :� U m o a a�
.�., ° O >
a. a. n ° �, as o 0 > -v
0 21� ` �� co •
to 3 0
mot• �
cn '
try
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 65 of 100
Low
d �
E
v o�
._
WE -IM
E
0
V �
O �
C
0
OE
m
-- o
� —
•—
�
D C C *••• 0 %*-• to
O C c U c �v =R3 o
p ° N �.
0 .°C
` O _ • �0 O w '(A t5 o. �o c CU
CL-Mt! a� to cm a•• tZ� -° U ca > CL
� Qc cQ
•- ca � •+•-' Z% O vJ U
O O v5 .� O O
%0. 0 O M CL
a � Q 0
w O o
OGMIW 0 8 (D 0
CL as � c a� as �. � o-
a, `- cu c OC V o are
OC Z a. m :o c •c. =cu
,c
co
_cn
cn
m
0
t1. w 3 -0 � •— �„ CL
tL� c S' �...
J � a• CO cC13 ° V c 0 0 >
•
O 00 CD �,• .0
cl �, c
Z
Lij
0 E tL 0 0= 0
w � •— o = Q
Z E V V 0 U tt'j cn
Z 0 — C �
0 0
0 C �' . z7 l� c C C. >.
__..
._ p .«�
Z c � •O O c� cv O •O CU
o ,a? c8 � c a cr c as � a '>
or._
(D a E p E .� > c cu t - o O a. (n 8 p
d
cu 0
CC c p O O ca
� O p O -0 O- cu _
C'n .E
!a Q CL cn cn 0
.r p •r♦ w
C
cL = O co C O O :S O V. co
. ' Q) L� % O ca O °
SONS _ M _ 4... a.
c c r -v ,� Q o --
0 E
V CZ p w- U •��- c ._ tai C c
p O O
CL 'L7
E E
O O •- .�..F— 0 0 C:
CT3 o 4) c � � o °C�L-° o � V a� �2:,
cu ci
o -- •— CU -o O V
m cu CL
0 CU
a. v L O .v ° ca c a�
v� — 3 _ V a� Q D
N N �
C/
CL CL CL
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 66 of 100
cc
E
C
0.
E
0
0
0
O der C: U)
0 0
0 cn C.) 4-d
LI) a cc cn cn
0 ca cu E cn a , i�.* 0
CL C.) cn 23 -— cn
CD E CD Ck-. a 0
S? L5 a cn 0 � C: E c%
0 0
0 (D a) cu cn Cc 0 (D ca 0 cu
> a CL > > cn ,
< cn
SOO. cn C3 0 CL 0 CL
0 0
LL as
CD
cm
0 %too
0
c S? w 0 2?
G� 0 (n (D
CL E > cn C43 a. (n a.
LLJ 0 4" i3f 0 so a cn of 0 C: CD
CL C Ca a 2 &C CU a
a 2
z
0 cU CL CL M O cu CL a. u)
cr ca in
cn cn cn
ca
0 U) U) (n
(n 4) U)
UJ U) 0.
CU 4) ca ca (D cc cp (D
>
0 >a 00 00 >
0 m c1q U o Cc ffi 2: qwm
0 > 0 > m 0 > w 0
Z 0 C: 0 a W — C: 0 a •0— 4)
=1 8 C) Ln U)
Uj 25. 0 :3 ?1 0 002� 9)
Z o Q0 too" mo > OE >
o Q T ICL%(D no LU . a 0 L) 0 M C.) Co
U) U)
U)
z U) U) U)
0 o
C:
0 cc 0
0 cn > cn
Z w 2 00 (n C D *0- 0
0 cn ca. 0 J.- Q.
0 0 C. Cl. Ca �i 75 2
cn cu cn 'Mo- 0 C�.
a ;a 0 ca
Z CD
0 Ca cu (M *0 0
'�_— Q tQ cu 0 0
cn 3c t5
>% 0 U) E2 CD CO
0 0.
> . =9 CL) '0 0.C:) cm
0 > 0 cr) 2 4 0 E
E
.92
0. 0 w ca
a CD 0 0 0
0
0 • Ca E ca
U) CL 0 0 0 c
jo-w: > >
> U) (D U)
0 u) M BI: 75 0 C% 2 cu
CU 0 >
C: 0
(n C)
U) CO (D cn
0 0 '00
W
0 -*Ono
L)
CL C: 4�
-b dft
U) L. L. %6-- V) cn u)
0 0 U)
C) Cr 0 0 -in- 1) 0
U) CL > 0 W CL)
a) m CU
ca U)
cn .0 r.L 0
O cu — to
C7) 3: CY) U) 0 a=
C.) 0
> - m
so 0 IX (n a -S?
40 0 0 cp E
0 % a.. :2 0.
Co 0 -0-0
a- 0. 0 0
CU
m ch E 0
C C) 0 0 > C: 0
w U- 0 CL 0 0
W
.j
C.0
I U)
CL 0
j
U
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 67 of 100
V
Lm
E
E
0
0 0
C
,o
oc
ca
c
a)
SOME
.#OOD
.c o C ` o C ` o c O C
4 O ` O O ` O U
V cL U CL
p O
o cc O ° m O cu o 4)
.....
cc
o> > c > > o
4) cn -
ci
to `'- U U U
CL
E cn
cn .O c _W O
-- o 0 o
CL !E E Z 8 a.Q ' •o o o c cu
tc Z Q. a- U) ,7 Q ca D. co Q. cn -0 cu CL
M 46
Z m cn
0- a�
• cn �• c a •Z
d. W c mm ca c ca 3 a 3 c a 9! c_vca o U 0 0 >� � o U
•` cr .o -tb o o — �U.SOMM ° c ° O o Z •r 0 >o c (L) o o .� c L- •
Z ° ca o �► :� c n. a c a c oQ ��
aa-
�
W Z
i-- —'o� _o Q p L. c � _ p L. c _oQ Z 0 ca C.) ca ca U •-0 cu c!) �
0 C/) CO c C) C/)
0
0 � � � � � ca � ?� a� cv c 00 — - a) n, cn
U) cu v 7 0 ;Q 3 a) � cn .c a)
Z ��'>
� C " .� � � O O C t= .�
Q O to � O tCi •'p '= ca O O �..
o c3, o ._ cis Je = _._. ._ O
V cu :� (D a ca a� c� ,♦... cr 0 � O
w •mow
O O Co -� O
CL m�" O V3 c= CU O -O 2 O 'a co
Q .r ,0 a? c� 3 � v = co > �n o
c a) .� .v ca cn Un - m c 3 �•
o � `n c > a c cd O = O o c Z
C- L ZCL c -- Ca � .cn
.6.0 cts c �-
,�.-° 4) c � �. c•c - O c O
ca o a� o o — •—._ 0 3 0 0
o o c�8 CU M cm 0
0 -0-0 cn 0 08 8
0 cn 'D — L. 0 0 8-0 c O O o o = Co p - W O �ca n O Co O o cr 8 ca v c vo
O O ca O
c ` c c
` O `�' c°n to ` 'C -O C cQ O cu
._
CD O'.� -O O O t0 .cu O C
a� ., •�-' N O ccoo o E .o C Ca o m o E E
.o ' Q- o cCL E Ca c c a O cu
8 cn ca ca c
c o ° ° .,o
a o �' u > cu o • ° • o C,o o $ C c E u � v
CD cn E o o o o c E
o v n Q o cn a a- o o gi
cn > 0 ° M =
cn
tL cv ca cn cv [Y_ 0 ca -0 CC a. cn O ° C. w
ce
cv p M �.
CY_ cr.
a 2
Resolution No. 04---089
Page 68 of 100
EXHIBIT"C"
APPROVED MODIFICATIONS TO PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
(see Planning Commission Revisions to General Plan Update Public Hearing Draft and Staff
Recommended Revisions following this page)
Resolution No. 04-089
EXHIBIT °C" Page 69 of 100
APPROVED MODIFICATIONS TO PROPOSED
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT -
lie INTRODUCTION
ps 11114,15 All Guiding Principles will be made the same as those in each element.
ps I Delete last paragraph.
2. LAND USE ELEMENT
p. LU-sl GUIDING PRINCIPLE
The City of Carson is committed to providing a sustainable balance of....
pe LU-3 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OUTREACH EFFORTS
...addressed in Section 5.0, Planning Facto Goalsl aad Policies, and
Implementation of this Element.
pe LU-8 Par. 2 ...and added to the Land Use Plan., Additional study areas were also
developed. The Land Use Plan....
p. LU-9-11 4.3 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Medium Density Residential (MD)
...single family attached and detached dwellings,...
Office Park (OP)
The Office Park designation is intended to provide for the development of
professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than
commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are
designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. The
Office Park isintended to provide a harmonious transition to residential
development and neighborhoods by: 1) Drovidincd high quality and attractive
buildings which are compatible with existing and anticipated development in the
area. 21 providino-open space, quality landscaping, and berms which achieve a
park-like sett inq�and 3 incl udina buffering of parking, loading docks and other
similar functions.
A new zoninc,Ldesignation will be developed to implement this'new General
Plan land use category.
Business Park (BP)
The Business Park designation is intended to provide an attractive, high gualitv
industrial/business park primarily for offices, light manufacturing and assembly,
and research and development. Warehousing of a small scale (for example, no
more than one ground level loading doorper x square feet of building) in
conjunction with a permitted primary use will be allowed. It may contain a very
Resolution No. 04-089
- Page 70 of 100
limited amount of supportive retail and service uses, when those uses are of a
Is
scale and design providina support only to the needs of businesses and their
employees in the immediate industrial a There are two scales of Business
Park designated in this General Plan: one for large properties that can be
planned and constructed as planned industrial/business parks and, t for
small pr erties that can have adequate landscaai p ng and small scale uses.
Both scales of Business Park are intended to provide harmonious transition to
residential development and neighborhoods by: 11 conducting all business
V 0 activities and essentially all storage inside buildings. 21 consisting of low profile,
hiah qualitv and attractive buildings-which are compatible with existing and
anticioated development in the area,31 providingpi)en si3ace, quality
on"
landscaoinq and berms which achieve a Darkmlike setting, and 41 including
buffering of parking loading doors and other similar functions. The maximum
allowable FAR is 0 5 and the average FAR which will ultimately be built out for
this land use is expected to be approximately 0.42.
Two zoning designations will be developed to 1molement this new General Plan
land use cateaory The Zoning Ordinance should provide r)arameters for the
size and intensity of buildings and uses.
Light Industrial (Ln
The Light Industrial designation is intended to provide for a wide variety of
industrial uses and tol"Imit those involving hazardous or nuisance effects.
Tvoical uses are manufacturing research and development, wholesaling, and
warehousin4 It may contain a very limited amount of suaaortive retail and
service uses when those uses are of a scale and design- providing support only
to the needs of businesses and their employees in the immediate industrial
area Uses identified as not exceeding Group 3 businesses handling acutely or
highly hazardous materials in the Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program
pursuant to the Los Angeles County Fire Code would be aermitted with proper
safeguards Performance and development standards are intended to allow a
wide range of uses as long as those uses will not adversely impact adjacent
uses Any exterior storage and limited operations must be fully screened from
any DUblic view and residential and commercial uses. The maximum allowable
FAR is 0.5Land the average FAR which will ultimately be built out for this land
use is expected to-aporox 1matelv 0.42.
This land use designation is implemented bv the ML—Manufactu Light
District.
Heave Industrial (HIl
The Heave Industrial designation is intended to provide for the full range of
industrial uses which are acceptable within the community, but whose
operations are more intensive and may have nuisance or hazardous
characteristics which for reasons of health, safety environmental effects, or
general welfare are best segregated from other uses. Extractive, primary
processing construction yards, rail operations truck yards and terminals, and
food orocessina industries are typical of this district, Uses identified as Group 4
or 5 businesses handling acutely or highly hazardous materials, in the
Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program pursuant to the Los Angeles County
Resolution No. 04-089
ISO Page 71 of 100
Fire Code would be permitted with ioroDer safeguards Outdoor storage and
operations may be permitted but extensive outdoor uses may require a
conditional use permit, Performance standards still must be metbut the
development standards are the minimum necessary to assure safe,-functional.
and environmentally-sound activities, Anv expansion of existing heave industrial
uses adjacent to residential must include buffered setback areas to the extent
feasible. The des anation may contain a very limited amount of sugDortive retail
and service uses when those uses are of a scale and design v rovidina suaport
only to the needs of businesses and.the'r eM01 ovees in the immediate industrial
area. The maximum allowable FAR 's 1,0. and the average FAR ut)on-ultirnate
buildout is expected to range-between 0.5 and 0.7.
This land use designation is implemented bv the MH-Manufactu ring, Heave
District.
OTHER LAND USES
Mixed*Uses (MU)
• 223'd and Avalon site (Study Area No. 21), is proposed to be MUaR f25)q
with a combination of residential (maximum density of 25 du/ac) and
general....
Industrial/Commercial Uses Buffer (*)
The Industrial/Commercial Uses Buffer symbol has been added to the Land
Use Plan to' indicate those areas of industrial or commercial property. generally
an 100 foot strip abutting the propetv line which requires structures and uses 0
to be set back and/or wails and landscaainq to be provided in order to buffer or
protect the residential uses from thelm cts of the industrial/commercial uses.
p. LU-al 3 4.4 LAND USE PLAN
...derived from that study as revised, is that which....
LAND USE SUMMARY
.,. However, two a new categories of Mixed Use halve been added....
Table LUo2 is relatively correct. It and the following paragraph will be revised
after adoption.
pe LU-14 Revised Exhibit LU,2, Land Use Plan
P. LU-1 7 LU-,IM-el v5:
^; WA:n1jarc nnd tholr Rrmumfialdo Oricim 64%00 1 A to 11�J'N ta"1 1%04%A90%04 1 1h W%
pe LU--1 8 LU-2sl Delete
ps LU-19 LU-IM-362 [Move to Goal LU.,7 as I.UdM-7.21
Establish zoning standards that properly designate uses
appropriate for Office Park, Business Park, Light Industrial, and
Heavy Industrial areas. '' '6 bi I"' '''' '''^^' ^`"'""° '' "''
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 72 of 100
Y*n rr4& in'lidnint At"Agitia-M chni ild bin restralg2tincl at =11alAtin
%0%4b%AW%08 a%0 1&1 W A IbA%W W
1i " lclk+ ndlinft'Iml mein
Onrok *csk+
I %A1 1% 16AR 4%.4 bm4WI Bib 11 1%4%,4QrW 14049 FAA#%0
%JWI&%40b4%W&M0441GY ig a
LU4M-m3.3 [Move to Goal LUm`7 as LU 4N"731 Where a discretionary review mayb ee gu ir ed��'#�s�gkf-tlm
� address compatibility issues (e.g.,
maneuverability of trucks on site, scheduling and hours of
operation, visual screening, noise, etc.).
p4, LU,-23 L Provide informational material to the owners of�ese properties in
targeted commercial areas..identifying....
p. LUo,25 L Review carefully any zone change....
P. LUm26 LU-,7e5 Monitor existing uses, and....
L Amend the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the Office Park.
Business Park....
ps LU-o27 . LU-IM"7,@6: Use buffers such as the Business Park land use designation and
0�
gnome the Industrial/Commercial Uses Buffer symbol between more
intensive....
p. LUw33 LUal 1 as Development of one or more "Signature Projects" to create a focal
rmint or points for the City.
P. LU-44 LU-elMm16v1: Add South Bay Pavilion area
34 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
ps ED-1 GUIDING PRINCIPLE
..• and a diverse and skilled labor force.
ps ED-9 Par,l: ...chains, This center ' has recently sold
and sere many P hvsical and use changes NPIAS
���e are
OWNSMOM"proposed.
4. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT .
po TI-5 Table TI-1 213!' Street, Avalon Blvd,, to 405 Freeway, Collector
pe TI-6 Table TI-1 Vera Street, Carson St. to 213th St., Seeet�aI y, Collector
P. TI-10 BICYCLE PLAN
The#3&1- Bicycle Plan, shown on Exhibit TI-4, Bicycle Plan, includ s the
facilities in the 1981 Plan 1+sfed-�e4ew. ...
Bonita Street— between Sepulveda Boulevard and Carson street
(existing in Calas Park);
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 73 of 100
P. TI-13 Revised Exhibit TI-4, Bicycle Plan
P. TI-1 S Revised Exhibit TI-6, Truck Routes
pp. TI-20-25 Revised Tables TI-4 and TI-5, Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Level of
Service
ps TI-34 4.5 TRAFFIC REDISTRIBUTION DUE TO DEL AMO OVER-CROSSING OF
1-405 FREEWAY
The Del Arno over-crossing of the 1-405 freeway wiN-be was completed
by-in May 2003 and named the Kay A. Calas Bridge. This new link in the
circulation system w+N resulted in.... ....new facility enabled
motorists.... The new crossing wtH resulted in shorter....
pp. TI-37-42 Revised Tables TI-10 and TI-11, Future AM/PM Peak Hour Level of Service
with General Plan Growth
pp. TI-43 Revised Exhibit TI-10, Deficient Segments (AM Peak)
pp. TI-44 Revised Exhibit TI-11, Deficient Segments (PM Peak)
pp. TI-45 Revised Exhibit TI-12, Plan of Streets and Highways
516 HOUSING ELEMENT
p. H-1 GUIDING PRINCIPLE
The City of Carson is committed to providing and improving a broad range of
quality housing opportunities,promoting home ownership and enhancing.,
residential neighborhoods. .
1.0 INTRODUCTION
...Community Developmentin July, 2002.
.=
6,s SAFETY ELEMENT
p4SAF-33 Implementation Measures:
SAF-IM-441 Reguire that the businesses located within Ya mile or lessfrom a
r esidential neighborhood, or �� mile or less from a critical care
facility follow the strictest guidelines possible reaardina the
handling, storage, containment and transportation of extremely
hazardous substances.
RA/D: Public Safety
FS: General Fund
TS: On-going
SAF.,IM-4,.2 Continue to conduct periodic inspections of all businesses usin4 or
storing hazardous materials to ensure safe practices and improve
communications with business personnel.
RA/D; Public Safety
FS:. General Fund
TF: On-going
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 74 of 100
p. SAF-w35 Implementation Measures:
SAFmIM"5.1 Request that the Fire District masintain a level of service to allow for
personnel to attend meetings and to respond promptly to the City's
environmental. site DI annin4. and building dan review processes.
RA/D: Fire. Planning Division
FS: District
TF*Q On-going
SAF=IM-5.2 Continue to conduct annual fire prevention inspections.
RA/D• Fire
FS: District
TFS On-going
SAFm.IMm5.3 Urge the use of smoke alarms, sprinkler systems, evacuation
ladders, and other fire protection and/or risk reduction devices.
RA/D: Fire., Building & Safety .
FS: District. General Fund
TFS On-going
SAFm1IVl-w5o4 Encourage the replacement of wood shake roofs with Class C
roofing materials or better.
RA/D: Fire, Building & Safety
F'So District. General Fund
TS: On-going
p. SAFm36 Policies:
SAFw6.9 Evaluate the need for future new Sheriff facilities.
Re.SAF-*37 Implementation Measures:
S Identify needs and alternatives for providing new Sheriff
facilities (Imolements SAFm6.91
RA/D• Sheriff. Public Safety, City Manager
FS: General Fund
TFG a 2006-07
pe P-9 3.8 Library Facilities
The Cftv of Carson is served bv the County of Los Angeles Public Library
stem Two facilities-Carson and Victoria Park Libraries. The service areas
for the two libraries have a-population of more than 116,000. Circulation of
materials has increased steadily in the Carson Library and remained stable in
the Victoria Park Library.
The planning standards for the Los Angeles County Library system are 3.09
persons per household, .3 0 library materials items per capita and 0.5 dross
square feet per capita Currently the community is under served in terms of
facility size and library materials items. There are no plans for library expansion
y the County In addition durina times of budgeta[y---cuts-,.11brajy----operations
funding is often reduced.
P. P.,26 ISSUE: LIBRARY SERVICES
The City_of Carson is undersery�d with library-facilities and services.
4
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 75 of 100
Goal: PM1 I Improve library facilities and services for the citizens of
Carson.
Policies: P101 I 1 Determine the projected need for library facilities and services.
P i 1 2 Investigate the most effective way to ovide for the needs of
the Cltvs
P 11 3 Implement clans for improved library service.
Implementation Measures:
P im 11 1 Work with Los Angeles County or seaarately to prgpare a
needs assessment for Carson library use. (Implements P-
11.1
RA/D• City Manager,Los Angeles County Librarian
FS: General Fund
TF: 2004.,05
p-al M 11 2 P reaare a feasibility study of alternative solutions to
providing additional liblibrary facume s li and services.
Omdements P-71.2)
RA/D• City Manager Los Angeles County Librarian (if
aopropriatel
FS: General Fund
TF6 2005-06
P4M-A 1 Determine and imalement the amoropriate solution.
Llmplements P-11.3)
RA/D: 'City Council
FS' Bonds, Loans, Grants
TFI 2006-07
p P-9 3.9 School Facilities
go
MOMEMMON The City is served bv-the Los Angeles U nified School District (LAUSDI.and MOMMMOMMOM
the COMP-ton Unified School District (CUSDI LAUSD has 14 elementary
ammmm�
schools five middle schools and six high schools that serve thegeneral
Carson area. CUSD has one elementary s middle school and one
high school serving the northern edge of the City The schools actually_
within the cltLboundanes are shown on Exhibit LUml.
In addition to gublic schools the City also contains two parochial schools
(Peninsula Christian and St PHH omena Catholic), an adult school, and the
California State University Dominguez Hills camaus.
School population growth proiected to 2020 would be generated by an
estimated 2142 new dwelling units plus natural growth, The Final
Environmental I mpact Report prepared for this General Plan includes Its
detailed anal ses of ioro'ections school ca acities and classroom needs at
the various grade levels. Generally there are three' schools serving Carson
9 t 0 6 0
with enrollment either at or over capacity and several other facilities are
nearing capacity. A The use of school impact fees, collected under the provisions of State Law,
supply the funding necessary to add classrooms as required, and are ,� —1
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 76 of 100
deemed to mitigate imp-act s In addition. LAUSD is currentiv Planninp the
use of State bond funds to repair ac inq classrooms and build new
neighborhood schools,*
p. P-26 ISSUE: SCHOOL FACILITIES
There will be some wth of school Lmoulations in the City which need
appropriate facilities and current boundaries require adiustment to provide
the optimum geggraphic proximity
Goal• P-12• Encourage the school districts to arovide enhanced school
facilities to serve the youth of Carson.
Policies: P-121 Work with the school districts to determine the vroiected
need for school facilities and servicesS
Pawl Work with the school districts to aapropriately alter
boundaries as necessa![ly to provide good school facilities Jh
dose proximity to the residential population served
implementation Measures:
PmIM.,l 1 1 Provide staff support and encourage the residents of
Carson to be involved in school district Oannema
(Implements P-i2.1 and P-12.2)
RA/D: Planning. PIO
FS: General Fund
TFv@ On-going
0
Ar
'ON GENERAL PLAN
Resolution
No. 04-089,-Pague.77..
of 100
BIKEWAYS
. • �Class 1 - Path
Class 11 - Lane
11LONDAII .....
Class III - Route
...�..: �•.•.�..4*j Adjacent Community
r•
1p9w T-0.. •;.�- .. fisting
I'M 4W milli,
t i '
f �} 1 vtti+l�•i it
• r/
•• •fit• r ire'.A h'• 1•dt .}j s•'�tr
Ic
pop A
6.0'410J
•r
, j
•1
• Y �� •
• ar
rz
ra
'' ' {�.•.tii, t,�t ��Z�1 '� '-{'-sill►«
'.•••• { ilk•�",'�'1 �n' •i�:.�}f�'• . • zow
4 f '
Q Z800
. ,�iF,�► 1• WOMMMI Meet
•~ti,'•� ti „r ..y l:,-lrw..ill/ r..w-wu rar wssc�ifn
i . ♦ 1 1•> • •'•!9L1, iii• 1•1�•J itfll�i•• wti�ii
1• {
• , • ,t I I 1
•• .••{* •� • ', • 44 •' k •
•..�.• • •.. •�.� ' • , 1�. 1
.,- S� • . • ,
quorum
I%Yqr how pp
AMU V-
�y ImoT IT.i •f�T.s •r .••.1 /�.• {� . �7 YI•1 �� ~i
1•.r.���" '-�1Nl f T �/• , .r.A"41 i R•fallr� 1►'i1• I
••.•••1 �..�•� -ft i-_ • • '�i• ! 1 s•do"•W..••rte• � I A"%wrii
. ;•� !•Z I•, 'L.�f1.'�!�>♦�=� •�t • •' 4�II.1�•I•� �.w�•�w�•,� 1 �r•/r.ry./�IYI�I•� '
CARS
• t
't '�• 1 1�' .�"�•t; �� Y t' .1 .{ � ., •1 �/ it1 ii.••ytLlil.�
•sR•� f 'P•,
• � '•��.t + 1 �� •.,w,�1.. .•JUt-r f�iMw••r+r w�«..as.lirrd�
•• '�1-+sia...sl.•a `� t rr�• 1 �j.�,n„► /s,//' � '���,•�,I/j, t,��
,•� »♦'TT•nil� VI���t��Ma+r/•I�O1.�.'�Si!� •.s{.itjl••l '.; ••�� �JI'J �'""�.`r,� � ' �•
•!• ,;J• *Tom~ ��.• �•�� �.•4 l� {tin��j.�'�,•�•• •,•w�� N �� I • '�••�••
...{:'{•i�ii+stl{ .1 i�.i.�iJ 1 1 • • .rte. ....r- ..
1 •.-.•. ..b•w ms's-�..
13 �Mftw mud
ftw"a
•1 r1..fi ',y1..;M•-tM.ia.r •a},�ff�t� ••� j •1 ,•, f ••';,
• L.r ss�s lrat*-.. 1 .1 •� •. II
.• {Rt, t� 1 , 1 t •�.;�/'�{I•4�'�i.!',�.•�L".jrj LT.•`0.1 ^.i't�.��'�/• • ,
•a•'!! J•�!T• 1Ai7ti T�7i •'�7rfr�if�' -,:• .} �1 t
id 31
�1•jaw•/III�~ irr�i f-AS• '��ti,�yti•�••�,, •� ��' ,� •
• •�iR �
.1+!, >si+*il!►�1...••.-«.r •bra'►•. /y / •f •
• M • �• •�'�. •• r •
•�• I
le• •*e,... .. '
• M ,�•',,�• t ' 1
i
- • -fir ••'Tr+_•'•.•,..��.`V��S '-'
Ir
BICYCLE P N
•j
N
Source:CIS Data,City of Carson,August 2003
9 1 '
August 18 2002 EXHIBIT T14
.
�
r
81KEAT-cS aP /'
c� 1 CARvqqN
o
"M dw•�
Resolution No. 04-089
lit om•+ *
Page 78 of 100
• Truck Routes
• Railroads
Channels
-00fte**left-Mj
�M.M-•N1••w•
Carson City Limit
Gardena Blvd
Gmenlear Blvd
;.,,......,«. �aoo o Zeoo
a •� Feet
IL .� .
Widri St
, a
. peftont St 'a
Vtctoda 9t ea
�� Vtotorla St
C1
IL
k• <
• tlnivers Or
192nd St a
% •
• i
1 OBI Amo 911Vd .-
Del Amo 81 ✓�,..._.....•_. MEN
Torrance Blvd J% _ a
�!
/Mcc)ttn uet St ,
V 3th St '• �`
caman St
220th St
223rnd St .
vU l '• •
`I •
r all'
Ale qw"too Ofto..
•
Se ulveda Stv I .
r � •
r `
1� •
cmita Blvd
• �l
WCO �
SERW=
T R
Source:GIS Data,City of Carson,November 2042 EXHIBITTI-,B
Revised Sept IS,2403
TRU Ci{Ro UTES.rnx d
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 79 of 100
-ft arstruly Ulm"rinfluiluu;U11111 lunnazor,12aff
•
Table
Ddsting AM Peak Hour Level of Service
wl s w w w • r w
W w • a • • r u
• w • w w
213 S t Main St Avalon Slid Collector 450 1 1 350 286 .18 0.64 C B
co St Collector 450 /�z 283 281 ' A 2 13 S t Avalon S t Chi �. �
21 31h S t Chico St Wilmington Ave Collector 450 1 1 117 90 026 0.20 A A
22(ph St Main St f Avalon Blvd Collector 450 1 1 135 242 0,30 0.54 A A
• 3m S t F' ueroa S t Maim S t Maur 750 2 2 646 857 0.43 0.57 A A Now Z2 19
223 St
Main St Avalon Blvd Major 754 2 2 762 795 Q.5i 0.53 A A
223w St Avalon St Wilmington Ave Major 750 2 2 594 669 UO 0.45 A A
3rd S Wilmin tan Ave Alameda St Major 750 2 2 688 745 0.46 0.54 A A
22 t g
8h St Main St Avalon Blvd Collector 450 i 1 127 149 0.28 0.33 A A
22
Alameda S t Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major 750 2 2 314 584 0.21 0.39 --A---. A
eP
Alameda S t Se ulveda Blvd 223rd S t Major 750 2 2 451 689 0,30 0.46 A A
AI a mem p
da S t 1-405 F wY Carson S I Major 750 2 2 5Z5 472 0.35 0.31 A A
MONSU 0
Al
ameda St Carson St Dominguez St Maur 750 2 2 340 395 0.23 0.26 A A
Abe g
rtoni St Fs ueraa St Main St Secondary 604 2 Z 394 451 0.33 0,38 A A
mpwwwmdw
A
lbertoni St Main St Avalon Blvd Sear aty 600 506 2 50fi 654 0.42 0.55 A A
__-
Al be cbont'St Avalon St SR-91 Fwy Secondary 600 2 2 530 319 0.44 0.27 A. A
A1�dra �'
Blvd F ueroa St Main St Major 7'50 3 3 .309 444 0.14 0.20 A A
Alan
dra Blvd Main St Avalon Blvd Major 750 3 3 339 512 0.15 0.23 A A wwwwmlwwwnww
A valon Blvd Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major 750 2 2 471 399 0.31 0.27 A A
A val on Blvd Sepulveda Blvd 223rd S t Major 750 2 2 815 509 0.58 0.34 A A
Avalon Blvd 223d St Carson St Major 750 2 2 891 727 0.59 0.48 A A
Avalon a o Blvd Carson St 213th St MlajOr 750 3 3 M 786 0.43 0.35 A • A
Avalon Blvd 213h St t-405 Fwy Major 750 3 3 976 900 0.43 0.40 A A
!vd Dorm uez St Del Amo Blvd Major 750 3 3 900 932 0.40 0.41 A A
Avalon B n9
Ava
Ion Blvd De!Arno Blvd university Dr Major 750 3 3 752 652 0033 0,29 A A
I Blvd Universi Dr victoria St Major 750 3 3 737 991 0.33 0444 A A
Avalon tY
Avalon Blvd victoria St Albertani St Major 750 3 3 898 765 0.44 0,34 A A
o ivd SR-91 Gardena Blvd Major 750 3 3 943 759 0.42 0.34 A A
Aval n B Fwy
Avalon 8iv d Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd Major 750 3 3 819 699 0,36 0.31 A A
Broadway Main St victoria St Major 750 2 2 307 131 0.20 0.09-- A A.
• Broadway victoria St Albedon!St Ma;or 750 2 2 351 i 94 0.23 0.13 A A
Fwy Broadway
SR-91 F Gardena Blvd Major 750 2 2 351 255 0.23 0.17 A A
Alondra Blvd Ma' 750 2 2 366 262 0.24 0.17 A A MENOMMON Broadway Gardena Blvd 3 __
F eroa St Main St Major 754 2 2 769 865 0.51 0.58 A A
Carson St igu
Carson St
Main St Avalon Blvd Major 750 2 2 790 958 0.53 0.64 A B
1- 05 F Ma'o r 750 2 2 1155 1054 0.77 0.70 C C
Carson St Avalon St Fwy 1
I-405 F Wilmington Ave Major 750 2 2 776 579 0.52 0.39 A A
Carson St Fwy 9
.
Ave Alameda St Major 750 2 2 561 949 0.37 0.63 A
Carson St Wilmington
Av
Carson St
Alameda St Santa Fe Ave Major 750 2 2 446 846 0.30 0.56 A A
now
_n xaft 1-41 la O"T-1 i L L fLaz---*
Resolution No. 04-089
80
.Page of 100
�
.moo
Table 444_Continued
Existing AM Peak Hour Levd of S enice.
ti
t". N w-
I t' w ■ w w r
A
t t w � � , • w • ■
• 750 2 2 272 338 0.18 0.23 • A A 0 -rDel l Ave Del Arno 81vd . Turmont St Major .
Turmont St University Or )kpr 750 2 2 397 316 0 26 0.21 A A
l Ave A
. 2 612 3�
• aSt 2 eh
al Ave UnWersit Dr Vicion
. 750 2 2 153 279 0.10 0.19 A A
F' ueroa'St Main S t Molar
na Blvd i9 400 A A
Enown • 'or 750 2 Z 0 0 0.00
Main St Avalon Blvd Mal
rno Blvd A A
Del Arno Bl vd Avalon St i --Central Ave
Mao 750 2 2 d59 67B 0.31 0.45
' 750 2 2 420 379 0.28 0.?a A A .
Central Ave 1f�lrnington Ave Major
Del Amo Blvd 0 a.32 A A
0 450 1 1 fi4 143 .�4
Sepulveda Blvd 228th St Collector
Dolores St Pu 270 0.17 0.18 A A
• �d Nla or •750 2 2 261
St
Lomita Blvd Sepulveda►B 1 '
Figueroa 203 0,12 0.14 A A
. Major 750 2 2 173
Figueroa St Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St 1
9 2 2 162 189 0.51--- 0.13 A A
• Carson St Major 750
Figueroa St 223rd St
Figueroa S t
Carson St Torrance Blvd IVla;or
750 2 2 646 196 0.43 0.13 A A
• 750 2 2 1226 446 0.82 0.30 0 A
• Tarance Blvd Del Arno Blvd Mapr
Figueroa St
' 75a 2 2 782 670 0.52 0.45 A A
• Del Amo Blvd 1-405 Fwy Major OMMOMOM Figueroa S t
• 1-405 F V'cctona S t Major mmmwmrm
750 2 • 2 900 584 O.fiO 0.39 A � A
F tgueroa S t wy � 0.36 0,29 .A A
Major 750 2 2 533 44
Figueroa St Victoria St SR-91 FwY Major 2 2. 477 422 0.32 0.28 A A
• F Gardena Blvd Major 750
Figueroa S t S R•91 wy 3
• Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd Ma jar
750 2 2 475 470 0.32 0. 1 A A
. Figueroa St 297 0.15 0,25 A A
ftuema Seconds 600 2 Z 17fi Gardena Blvd S t Main S t Secondary
a 600 2 2 213 151 018 0.13 A A
Gardena Blvd
Main St Avalon Blvd Secondary
• 750 2 2 838 973 0.56 0. A 8
FLomita F' ueroa St Main St Molar ONEW" -
Lomita d i9 0.49 0.55 A A
Major 754 2 2 736 82fi
d Main 5t Avalon,8tvd Major
324 305 0.4.3 0.41 A A
ameda St Major 750 # 1vd Wilmington Ave Al ---
• Lan•�ta Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major
750 2 2 937 637 0.62 0.42 8 A
Main St
• 7� 2 2 633 515 0.42 0.34 A A
Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St Major
Main St 850 872 0.57 0,45 A A
• arson St Major 750 Z Z
Main St 223rd St Carson
750 2 2 855 fi37 0.57 0.42 A A
• Carson St 213th St Major .
Main St 521 4.55 0.35 A A on" Blvd Ma' r 750 � 2 2 830
Win St 2131h St Torrance K�
M� � 0,48 0.33 A A,Now lmomwmsw
Blvd Major 750 Z 2 724 Main St Torrance Blvd Del Amo B
• 750 2 2 727 603 0.48 0.40 A A .
• flat Atha Blvd 1-405 Fwy Major
Main St
' 7 0 2 � 2 841 619 0.56 0.41 A A
•
Broadway Mapr 5
Main St I-d45 Fwy A
• 754 2 2 501 421 0.33 0.28 A
• Broadway Vic#ono St Major
Main St ay 377 0,36 0.25 A A
main St Victoria St Albedoni S t
Ma' r 754 Z Z 544 1 powpown
M 85 451 0.46 0.34 A A
. 8�d Major 750 2 2 6
Main St SR-91 Fwy Gardena I
' 750 Z 2 516 477 0.34 A A
• Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd Major
Main S t mmmwwwp
Monela Ave
228th St 223rd St Collector
450 1 1 146 112 0.32 0.25 A A
n St Dominguez St Secondary 600
2 2 7 i 8 793 0.60 0.66 A 8
Santa Fe Ave Carson 2 2 688 833 0.57 0.69 A B
Santa Fe Ave
Dominguez uez S t Del Amo Blvd Secondary 6C4
• 2 2 7 c8 832 4.d9 0.55 A A
' coo St Main St Major 750
Sepulveda Sled Figueroa
Wnwommme
Sepulveda 8
Ivd Main St Avalon Blvd Major
7 2 2..j 932 724 O.fi2 0.48 8 A
L
.rrrwriw ,M1�;W^t1 lint!Mi•1 w
Resolution No, 04--089
Page 81 of *100
111110WIN:gAl.lain
Oita
xvinuitoizammunumul
Table
Continued
E�sting AM Peak Hour Level of Service all
* • • w w i
w .t f w •
• M w � r w w • w
• l50 z 2 194 s34 0.�3 a,42 A A
Se Wa SW Avalon St Wflmbgton Ave Major Pu .
e ufveda 61vd Wilmington Ave Alameda 5t
�or 750 Z 2 410 3� 0.27 0.24 A A
Sepulveda 750 2 2 458 558 0.31 4,37 A A
Se u�B1vd Alameda St Intecmadal 1 P 0.25 0.36 A A
Nueroa S t Secondary 600 2 2 297 421 Torrance Blvd St Main
• Ave Secaxda 604 2 2 2T7 303 0.23 0.25 A A
llnNers Or Avalon St Central Av rY
• Ave Secondary 600 2 2 341 166 0.25 0.14 A A
University Dr CenUal Ave Av rY
• M�' r 750 2 2 765 824 0.51 0.55 A A
Victors St Figueroa S t Main S t is
• Major 750 2 2 6J3 618 0.41 0.41 A A
Victoria St Main St Avalon Sind 1
EMMOMM. Ma' r 750 2 2 595 491 0.40 0.33 A A
Victoria St Avalon S4 Tamdiff Ave
• e Ma' 750 2 2 324 376 0.22 0.25 A A
Victoria S t Tamcliff Ave Cenfraf Av pr
• Ave Ma' r 750 1 1 395 262 0.53 4.35 A A
Victoria St Central Ave Wilmington A ftwm�--_
• Blvd Ma'or 754 2 2 495 496 0.33 0.33 A A
Wilmington Ave Lomita fllvd Sepulveda 8 j
rd St Ma'r l50 2 2 841 768 0.56 0.51 A A
Wilmington Ave Sepulveda Blvd p ---
Ma' 750 2 2 1147 1507 0.74 1.04 C F
1��mu�gtan Ave 223rd St l-405 Fwy ia'
Wilmington Ave 1-405 Fwy Carson St
Ma'r 750 2 2 892 692 0.59 0.46 A A
Ma' r 75Q 2 2 1359 775 0.91 0.52 E A
Wilmington Ave Carson S t 2131h St �
. d Mar 750 2 2 1043 684 0,67 d. B A
Wilmington Ave 213th St De!Arno Blv �
�9
. Dr Ma'r 750 2 2 880 917 0.59 0.61 A B
Wilmington Ave Del Amo 81vd Univesslty to 0.=.�
• Ma'ar 750 3 3 810 1183 0.36 0.53 A A
1Nilmtngton ke University Or Victoria St S
.
• Resolution No. 04-089
Page 82 of 100
Last
WTI:
Table .
Eidstin PM Peak Hour Level of Service
w r
•
* w a •
Maln St Avalon BW Collector 450
1 1 364 398 0 8'! D D D
213th St .
. 418 337 ' . �EI momminnon No Z13ih St Avalon St Cl��ca St .
Collector 450 .�S' '
• Collector 450 1 1 124 211 0.28 0,48 A A
WOME110I
213th S t Chico St Wilmington Ave
• Collector 450 1 1 271 224 0.60 0.50 B A
220th St Main St Avalon Blvd MUMONOW
owmmmwsmwmmwwmpd • r 75 0 2 2 1025 614 0.68 0.41 B A St F ueroa Sl Main St
223rd �
• 'or 750 2 2 971 641 0.65 0,4.3 B A
---223rd
St Main St Avalon Blvd Mal
• � ' i 750 2 2 836 689 0.56 0,46 A A
223rd St Avalon St W�lrn�ngton Ave Mato
• Ma•or 750 2 2 1587 511 1.06 0.34 F A
223rd St Wilmington Ave Alameda St 1
• Collector 450 1 1 127 117 0.28 0.26 A A
228th St Matn St Avalon Blvd
Ma'or 750 2 Z 607 521 0.40 0.35 A A
Alameda St lom��a Blvd Sepulveda Blvd I
Ma'or 750 Z 2 873 645--, 0.58 0,36 A A
Alameda St Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St 1
Major 750 2 2 524 499 0.35 0.33 A A
Alameda St 1-405 Fwy Carson St 1
• Major 754 2 2 427 438 0.28 029 A A--NENOWAMMOVI
Alameda St Carson St Dorntnguez St l - I
• Seconda 600 2 2 541 325 0.45 027 A A
Alberloni St Figueroa St Main St ry
• � Secondary 804 2 2 1004 303 0.84 025 D A
Albettonl St Main St Avalon Blvd � .
Albertans St Avalon S SR 91 Fwy Seconds 604 2 2 883 258 0.74 0.22 C A
• Ma' r 750 3 3 396 399 0.18 0.18 A A
Alondra Blvd Figueroa St Main Si la IIIIWIIIIII MOM"
• Major 750 3 3 532 419 0.25 0.19 A A mom Alondca Blvd Main St Avalon Blvd 3
Major 754 2 2 47fi 591 0.32 0,38 A A
Avalon Blvd Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd l
Blvd Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St
Major 75,p Z 2 668 88i 0.45 4.5'9 A A
Avalon Pu 003 0.61 0.87 8 8
Avalon Blvd 223rd St Carson S t
Ma' r 750 2 2 9?.2 1
Avalon Blvd Carson St 2131h St
Ma'r 750 3 3 1076 1266 0.48 0.56 A A
a' r 150 3 3 1201 136.9 0.53 0.61 A B
Avalon Blvd 213th St ��Fwy M 1°
• 'or 750 3 3 1087 1156 0.48 0.51 A A
Blvd Dornin uez St Del Amo Blvd
Major
ONOGNOOM Avalon 9 8 0.41 0.41 A A
' Ma or 750 3 3 919 91
Avalon Blvd De!Arno Blvd Unvversity Dr 1 .WINOMEMON
• • 'r 150 3 3 1142 1015 0,51 0.45 A A- __d Univec� Dr
Victoria St ll�alo
Avalon 81v tY
• Mai or 750 3 3 852 . 1060 0.38 0.47 A A
01
Avalon SW vlctana St Albecloni St Nlalo
d S�_91 F Gardena Blvd Major
750 3 3 10x5 1074 0.45 0.48 A A
Avalon Blv Fwy
c 750 3 3 1013 � 901 0.45 0.40 A A
Avalon Blvd Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd M*
• . 75Q 2. 120 377 0.08 . 0.25 A A- -
Main St Victoria S t Maur
Broadway .15 0.22 A A
• r 750 2 2 232 331 0
• Victoria S t• Albertan' Mai
Broadway 018 0.21 A A
Major 750 2 2 27fi 317
Broadwa SR-91 F" Gardena Blvd l
Y A A� 0.21
Broadway Gardena Blvd A
londra Blvd Major 750 2 2 315 022
• or 750 2 2 i270 935 0.85 0.62 D B
Carson St Figueroa St Main Std
Ca 9
• 750 2 2 1234 968 0.82 0.55 D B
Carson St Main S1 Avalon Blvd Major
750 2 2 1346 1033 0.90 0.69 D B
Capon
St Avalon St 1-405 Fwy Major
• 750 2 2 864 714 .0.58 0.48001 A A
Carson St 1-405 Fwy Wilmington Ave Major
' 750 2 2 829 649 0.55 0.43 A A
Carson on St Wily* ton Ave Alameda St Major
• 750 2 2 871 515 0.58 0,34 A A
Carson St Alameda St Santa Fe Ave Mtajor
• p 2 2 380 35S 4.25 0.24 A A
Arno Blvd Turmont St Major 75
Central Ave DeI A ,, A A
• 750 2 2 287 416 0.19 0.28
CenttaS
Ave T urmon t S t University Dr Major
cuversi Or Vctona St
2 2 3g5 399 A A
Central Ave U tY
n,7 E1 7 r r l
t
Resolution No, 04-089
Page 83_ 100
--anvznfil R1 all IC111 gin fill'All 9=1 I
1
Tab1e4J,J=rr,, Continued
Existing PM Peak Dour Level of Service - •
A • r A r M M •
A i • A A • • w
i •
• A II M • i w r
Maor 750 2 30
lot
2 9 205 0.21 ON A A
amoso
Del Arno Blvd Figueroa St Mab�t
De!Amo Blvd Main St - Avalon Blvd Major 750 2 Z 0 0 0.00 0.00 A A Now
monsoon Del Amo Blvd Avalon St Central Ave Major 750 2 2 691 74.0 0.46 0.49 A A
Central Ave Wilmington Ave Major 750 2 2 477 554 0.32 0.37 A A
Del Amo Blvd 9
t St Collector 450 1 1 128 99 0.28 012 A A
Dolores S t Sepulveda Blvd Z28 h
Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major 750 2 2 286 256 0.19 0.17 A A
Figueroa Si �
Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St Major 750. 2 2 36`3 316 0.24 0.21 A A
Figueroa St �
Figueroa St 723rd St Carson St Major 754 2 2 602 283 0.40 0.19 A A"WEN
t Torrence Blvd Major 750 2 2 410 346 0.27 0.23 A A
Figueroa S t Carson S
Figueroa St Torrance Blvd Del Arno Blvd Major 750 2 2 1078 499. 0.72 0.33 C A
Del Amo Blvd 1-405 F Major 750 2 2 381 1152 0.25 0.77 A C
Figueroa St wY
• 1-405 victoria St Major 750 2 2 663 733 0.44 0.49 A A
Figueroa S t wy
• SR-91 F Ma' r 750 Z 2 459 511 0.31 0.34 A A
Figueroa St Victoria S! wY to
SR-91 F Gardena Blvd Major 750 Z 2 465 534 0.31 03 A A
Figueroa St wy
Figueroa St
1:Gardena Blvd Alondra SNd Major 750 Z Z 559 509 Q,37 0.34 A A now
F'ueroa St Main St Secondary 600 2 2 269 302 0.7.2 0.25 A A
Gardena Blvd i9
Gardena Blvd
Main St Avalon Blvd Secondary 600 2 2 250 250 0,21 0.21. A A
�
Lomita Blvd F ueroa St Main St Major 750 Z 2 1285 702 0.86 0.47 D A
Lomita Blvd
Main S! Avalon Blvd Major 750 2 2 812 753 0.54 0,50 A A
rig
Lomita Blvd
Wilmington Ave Alameda St Major 750 i 1 417 335 0.56 0.45 A A
Main S! L omita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major 750 2 2 780 691 0.52 0,46 A A
• 223rd St t Major 750 2 2 658 756 0.44 0.50 A A
Main St Sepulveda Blvd 1
Main S t 22d St Carson St Major 750 2 2 697 1023 0.46 0.68 A 8
3r
Main St Carson St 213th St Major 750 2 2 695 922 0.46 0.61 A 8
onnom• Torrance Blvd Major 750 2 2 250 953 0.17 0.64 A B
Masn St 213th St
• Ma•or 750 2 2 491 828 0.33 0.55 A A
SUN~
Mash St Torrance Blvd Del Amo Blvd l
Mann St Del Arn wY o Blvd 1-405 F Maur 750 2 2 679 774 0.45 0.52 A A
• Smadwa Major 750 2 2 643 1017 0.40 0.66 A B
Main St 1.405 Fwy Y
• Victoria St Major 750 2 2 458 599 0.31 0.40 A A
Main St Broadway --
• 'or 750 Z 2 398 640 0.27 0.43 A A .WOMEN==ON Main St Victoria St Albertoni St Mal
• Gardena Blvd Major 750 2 7 5% 653 0,34 0.44 A A
Main St SR-91 Fwy I - -- --.0
• Alondsa Blvd Ma• r 750 2 2 494 515 0.33 0.34 A A 1 Mann 5t Gardena Blvd �
Monela Ave 228th St 223rd St Collector 450 1 1 10 6 138 0.23. 0.31 A A Nown.MMPN-pm - -
Dominguez St Secondary 600 2 2 933 91 i U.78 0.76 C C
Santa Fe Ave Carson St 9
Santa Fe Ave Dominguez
St Del Amo Blvd Secondary 600 2 2 1042 832 0.87 0.69 D 6
Sepulveda Blvd Figueroa St
Main St
Sepulveda Blvd Main St Major 750 2 2 838 855 0.56 0.57 A A
Avalon Blvd Mapr 750 2 2 837 860 0.56 0.57 A A
Wilmington Ave Major 750 2 2 713 778 0.48 0.52 A A
Sepulveda Blvd Avalon S t 9
Sepulveda Blvd Wilmsngton Ave
Alameda St Major 750 2 2 373 05 0.25 0.28 A A
lnterrnodal Wor 750 2 2 738 812 0.49 0.54 A A
11.14 In I
Sepulveda Blvd Alameda S l
.. 1d i C 19 U l f 1 i I-
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 84 of 100
` N,
a
ERR YN��
Table - Continued
�sting PM Peak Hour Level of Service
•
•
* s w • w w ■
« s • A w w w r
S Secanda 500 2 2 532 353 0.44 0.29 A Torrance 8ivd Figueroa St Mah t rY
Central Ave Seconds 500 2 2 326 275 0.27 0.23 A A
won UnNers�ty Dr Avalon St nt ry
Ave Seconds 600 2 2 172 319 O,i 4 0.27 A A
UnNersity Dr Genital Ave Mirri'mg(on �
Maim S t Mato' r 750 2 2 1093 732 0.13 0.49 C A
Victoria St Nuerct St
Vt
.ctona St Main St Avalon Blvd Major 750 2 2 913 541 0.61 0.36 B A
Victoria St Avalon St Tamdift'Ave Major 750 2 2 812 726 0.54 0.48 A A
' S TamdIff Ave _ Central Ave Major 750 2 2 653 595 0.44 0.44 A A
Y`�ctona t
1�ctona
' St Central Ave Wiiming ton Ave Major 750 1 1 325 480 0943 0.64 A B
ion Ave Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major .750 2 2 372 659 0.25 0.44 A A
Vviim Ong eP
to Ave Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St Major 750 2 2 801 930 0.53 0.62 A 6
Wilmington p
Wilmington ton Ave 223rd Si 1-405 Fwy Major 750 2 2 1174 IN 0.78 1.08 C F
St Mla' r 750 2 2 719 947 0.48 0.63 A 8
Wilmington Ave 1-405 Fwy Carson
ton Ave Carson St 213th St Major 750 2 2 938 1325 0.63 0.88 8 0
Wilmington A
' to Ave' 2131h St Del Amo Blvd Major 750 2 2 885 1006 4.59 0.67 A 8
Wilmington
• U 'versa Or Major 750 2 2 1013 933 0.68 0.62 8 B
Vltlmington Ave Del Ama Blvd ni � i
Wilmington Ave University Or
�ctocia St MjaOr
750 3 3 1 106 851 0.49 0.38 A A
. ,.. .,
i
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 85 of 100
PIEUIR]RI MEN 4" 0115,WX-110411 a 01-AMIS amino 04'W a nowe W
i
b
CL
•
Table Palms to
ANi Pe�a��Our Level of Se�.-vice�U'Yth General Plan Growth
Future
r 1
w v w • • r
w r
� � w • • w w w
. MEMO.1 388 soy o.es 1.35 0 F sommum plollIlIIIIIIIII nommu I S Avalon Blvd Colector 750
213th St Mam t
• Collector 750 1 325 378 0.72 0,84 C 0
213th St
Avalon S t Chico S t Now
• Col<ector 750 �I 151 178 0,34 0.39 A A 1110111111111111111 --213th St Chico S t Wilrni ngton Ave
220th St Main St Avalan Blvd Collector 750 1 1 321 288 0.71 0.64 C B
a' r 750 3 3 107 964 0.47 0,64 A 8 ..
d St Fi ueioa St Main St la
223r 9
223rd
S t Main S t
Avalon on Blvd Mato r
750 3 3 783 965 0.52 0.54 A B U-0-manw-aft
nammo • Major 750 3 3 840 9W 0.56 0.60 A 8
223rd St Avalon St Wilmington
Ave I
• Ma' r 150 3 3 997 12}2 0.66 0.80 B D
?23rd St Wilmington Ave Alameda St �
• Collector 750 1 1 156 167 0.35 0.37 A A
228th St Main St Avalon Blvd
• Major 754 3 3 456 fi 45 0.34 0,43 A A
Alameda St Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd �- - Ma or 750 3 3 614 911 0.41 0.61 A e
Alameda St Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St Major
750 3 3 725 791 0.48 0.53 A A-- -
Alameda S t 1-405 F Carson St Mat
Alacn wY
•
Wor 750 3 3 523 615 0.35 0.41 A A
Alameda St Carson S t oan inguez S t ---
• Seconds 750 2 2 429 550 4.3fi 0.46 A A
Albertoni St Figueroa St Main St iY
• Second 750 2 2 693 933 0.58 0.78 A C
Albertoni St Main S t Avalon Blvd �'! •
Seconds 750 2 2 � 585 358 0.49 0.30 A A
Albertoni St Avalon St SR-91 Fwy Secondary .
. Ma•or 75p 3 3 400 483 0. 8 O.Z A A
Alondra Blvd
Figueroa S t Main S t 3 .
wommos
Ma• r 750 3 3 470 722 0.21 4.32 A A
Alondra Blvd Mach St Avalon Blvd to
Ma•or 750 3 3 131 477 0.49 4.32 A A
Avalo,Blvd Lomita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd j
Major 750 3 3 1254 7'" 0.84 0.50 D A
Avalon Blvd Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St 1
Ma'or 75Q 3 3 1253 1419 0.84 0.68 D B
Avalon Blvd 223rd St Carson St. t
Ma or 750 3 3 1258 848 0,56 0.38 A A
Avalon Blvd Carson St 2131h St 1
a• r 150 3 .3 12fi4 1187 0.56 0.53 A A
Avalon
gad 213th St 1-405 Fwy M io
• 'or 750 3 3 1999 1 i14 0.89 0.49 D A
Avalon Blvd Dominguez St Del Arno Blvd Nlaj
9
• Major 750 3 3 1361 . 999 . 0.60 0.44 8 A
Blvd Del Arno Blvd University Dr
• 'or 750 3 3 1247 1337 0.55 0.59 A A
Avalon Blvd Unnrersi Dr
Victoria St Mal
Ava tY
-am ::1- • Ma or 75Q 3, 3 1053 1076 0.47 0.48 A A
Avalon
Blvd vlctona St Abedoni St l
Ivd SR-91 F Gardena Blvd M
a•r 750 3 3 1171 984 0,52 0.44 A A
womm Avalon B �'�Y
Major 750 3 3 1019 J 107 0.45 0.49 A A
Avalon Blvd Gardena Blvd Alondra Egvd Maj
• 'r 750 3 3 476 439 '0.32 0.29 A A
Broadway
Main S t Victoria S t ��
• 'r 750 3 3 549 .497 0.37 0.33 A A
Victona St Albertont St Mato
Broadway Q 29 4.32 A A
Ma or 750 3 3 440 486
Broadway R-91 Fwy Gardena Blvd j
Y 532 0.34 0.35 A A
Blvd Ma'or 750 3 3 448
Bma� Gardena Blvd Alondra 8 1
Y 786 126 i 1.19 0.84 F D
Carson St Figueroa St
Main S t Sem�dacy 750 2 2 1
• Secondary 750 2 2 1479 1884 0.99 126 8 F
Carson St Main St Avalon Blvd Secon ry
a' r 754 3 3 1875 1934 1.25 129 F F
Ca
rson St Avalon St l-�F'�Y � t°
' 'or 750 3 3 1072 736 0.71 4.49 C A 011llill arson St 1-445 F 1�filrningion Ave Mal
C wY
. Major 750 3 3 � 835 1190 0.56 1.19 A F
Carson St Wilmington Ave . Alameda St M ; •
'o� 750 3 3 571 1455 0.35 0.97 A E
Cars
on St Aiarneda St Santa Fe Ave Mai
or
Del Amo Blvd Turmont St Major
750 3 3 597 651 0.40 0.43 A A
Central Ave
• �Ir 75Q 3 3 l28 fi23 0.49 0.42 A A
ve Turmont St University Dr M
Central A
• Lecaondary � 750 2 2 999 1717 L'--1 1 1.91 F F
ve Universi Or 1�tctoria St -
Central A t
• Bye t`a •
r en [
Resolution No': 04-089
Page 96,b o.f 100
tx AL IM
�rM
. Table Continued
General Plan G rowth
]Future AM Peak.Hour Level of ServrCeWith
N
•
w w
• ' 0 3 • 3 1246 662 0.83 0.44 D A
Blvd Figueroa St 11 in st Mapr 75
Del Arno �
Blvd Major 150 3 3 1397
714 0.93 0.48 8 A
Del Arno Blvd Main St Avalon S
Del Arno Blvd Avalon St Central
Ave K*r 750 3 3 1893 1537 1.25 1.02 F F
' ton Ave Ma•or 750 3 3 743 1333 0.50 0.89 A D
Del Amo Blvd central Ave Wilmington Mai
or
St Sepulveda Blvd 228th St Russ" Ow
Collector 750 1 1 87 150 0.15 0.33 A A
•
Sepulveda Blvd Ma' r 750 3 3 350 341 0.23 0.23 A A
Figueroa St Lomita Blvd SeFuly
d St Ma' r 750 3 3 415 307 0.28 0.20 A A
Figueroa St Sepulveda Blvd 223r O
• S t Ma'or 750 3 3 1180 448 0,19 0.30 C A
•
Figueroa S t 223rd S t Carson 1
•
Torrance Blvd Ma' r 750 .3 3 1962 527 1.31 0.35 F A
Figueroa St Carson Sl Tarran �
• a Blvd Wor 150 3 3 2042 848 1.36 0.5F A
Figueroa St Torrance Blvd Del Arn
• Ma' r 750 3 3 809 1058 0.54 0.11 A .-C
Figueroa St Qel Amo Blvd 14Q5 Fwy �
• ' or'a St Ma' r 754 3 3 1059 968 0.71 0.65 C 8
Figueroa St 1-405 Fwy Vict
• -9 F Ma'or 750 3 3 659 622 0.44 0.41 A A
Figueroa S t Victona 5 t SR-9i wy l
• Gardena Blvd Major 750 3 3 5Tfi 649 0.38 0.43 A A
Figueroa S t SR-91 Fwy G j
• dra Blvd Major 750 3 3 559 736 0.37 0.49 A A
F�ueroa S t Gardena Blvd Akx� 1 .
Gardena Blvd Figueroa St Main St Secondary 750 2 02 214 317 0.18 0.26 A A
•
Avalon Blvd Seconds 750 2 2 316 290 0.26 0.24 A A
Gardena Bind Main St Ava cY
• 'or 750 3 3 1a21 1049 0.38 0.70 a s
now
Lomita Blvd Figueroa S t Main S t Mal
• Avalon Blvd Ma or 754 3 3 834 894 0.56 0.60 A A
Lomita Blvd Main Sl Av 1
• Alameda St Ma' r 150 3 3 355 330 0.47, 0.44 A A
Lomita Blvd Wilmington Ave Alam nommomanow
• ulveda Blvd Mar 750 3 3 1260 1141 0.84 0.76 D C
Main St Lom tla Blvd Sep �
• d 5t Ma' r 750 3 3 973 758 0.65 0.51 8 A
Mann St Sepulveda Blvd 223r 10 OWN
• St Mar 750 3 3 1396 961 0.93 0.64 E 8
Main St 223rd S t Carson
• St Ma' 750 3 3 2528 1161 1.6'9 0.77 F C MONO Main St Carson St 213th �
Blvd Major 750 3 3 2566 1042 1.71 0,69 F 8
• Main St 213th St Torrance 1
• 0 Blvd Major 750 3 3 2755 1241, 1.84 0.83 F D
Main St Torrance Blvd Del Am I
• Ma' c 750 3 3 1059 108 4 0.71 0.72 C C
Main St De!Amo Blvd 1-405 Fwy opi
a Ma' r 750 3 3 992 1118 0.66 0.75 8 C
Mach St I-405 Fwy groadw y �
• Ma' r 750 3 5lQ 619 0.38 0.4i A A
Main St Broadway Victona St p• n'st 750 3 798 825 0.53 0.55 A A
Main St Victoria St Aberto t• Ma• r 750 12.9 3 948 934 0.63 0.62 B 6
Main St SR-91 Fwy Gardena 61vd
• Ma' r 750 3 3 635 955 0,42 0.64 A 8
Main St Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd p
Moneta Ave 228th St 223rd S t
Collector 754 1 1 205 135 0.46 0.30 A A
' e St.... Seconds 150 2 2 1039 1077 0,87 4.90 D D
Santa Fe Ave Carson St Domingo Secondary
0 Blvd Seoonda 750 2 2 848 1108 0.11 .0.92 C E
Santa Fe Ave Dominguez St Del Am rY
• Ma•or 750 3 3 1439 1 i 19 0.96 0.75 E C
Sepulveda Blvd Figueroa St
Main S t 1
• Major 150 3 3 1336 1049 0.89 0.70 0 B
Sepulveda Blvd Main St Avalon Blvd j
Ave
Maio( 750 3 3 1212 863 0.81 0.58 D A
Sepulveda Blvd Avalon S t
Wilmington 1
. Ma•or 750 3 3 705 535 0.47 0.36 A A
Sepulveda Blvd Wilmington Ave Alameda St j
Ma'or 750 3 3 804 6,% 0.54 0.43 A A
Sepulveda Blvd Alameda St Intermodal 1
• �1 Jill
Jill
4 � �r'M
V
Resolution No. 04-,089
Page 87, of 100
N.
fa
of nu SUIUROULBUXA1 Is DART 2
i
Table -Continued .
Future AM Peak H Level off"Service With General Plan Growth'
■ r • • w w . w ,.
w ■ s • w • ■
Seconds 750 2 2 1843 869 1.54 0.72 F 'C
Torrance Blvd . Figueroa at Main St � mwww --
lkttvecstty Or Avalon St Central Ave Secondary 750 2 2 412 339 0.34 0.28 A A
Ave NUMEONM Wilmington Ave Se=dary 750 2 2 381 367 4.32 0.31 A A
Un{verstty Dr Genital
. Figueroa S t Main S t Major 750 3 3 1015 994 0.68 0.68 B 8
Victoria S� Fg '
• Blvd
War 750 3 3 685 761 0.46 0.51 A A
Victoria S t Main S t Avalon
• Tamdff Ave Ma' r 754 3 3 917 616 0.61 0.41 8 A
Viciana St Ava{on Si to
a di .Central Ave Major 750 3 3 632 495 0.42 0.33 A A
Victoria St T m Ave
Central Ave Wilmington Ave Major. 750 3 3 585 553 0.78 0.74 C C
Victors St n
o ita Blvd Sepulveda Blvd Major 750 3 3 1136 639 0.76 0.43 C A
Wilmington Ave !. m lv Ep
Blvd 223rd St Major 750 3 3 1639 909 1.09 0,61 F 8
Wilmington Ave Sepulveda
rd St 1405 F Major 750 3 3 2198 1173 1.47 1.18 F F
Wilmington Ave 223 wy
• Carson St Ma' r 150 3 3 2277 1463 1.52 0.98 F E
Wilmington Ave 1405 Fwy
S 213th St Major 750 3 3 2759 1100 1.84 0.73 F C
IlVilmington Ave Carson t
• t St Del Arno Blvd Major 750 3 3 2162 1417 1.44. 0.94 F E
Wilmington Ave 213 h
Del o Blvd Wiversi Or Major 750 3 3 1532 1261 1.02 0.84 F D
VYlsmrngton Ave D 1 Am �
Wilmington Ave Unto ty
ersi Or Victoria St Major 750 3 3 1324 2683 0.59 1.19 A F
I- 9 04 n-14 =-Aid
-
Resolution No. 04-089
Page gg of .100
NU C �tjj ntruni
Manton
ewe
Table '
. General Plan Grov�t�l Yel of Ser dce With Future P
1'1�Peak dour�e ,.
!' 1 w !
f
• t• • w w w N
A
. OW •t, 484 642 1.08 1.43 F F
22h St Main St .
Avalon� Co�ecior 750
. 1 't 543 404 1.21 0.94 F D
Chico St Co�ector 75D .
2131h St Avalon St 8
. 1 1 234 27e o.52 0.62 A• 1lvilrnt ton Ave Calleotar 750
L213thSt Chico St n9 C
Avalon Blvd Collector 750 1 �
409 328 0.91 0.73 E
2201h St Main St C A
• 3 3 1094 792 0.73 0.53 Main St Mapr 750
. 223�a St •Figueroa St B B
• Avalon Blvd Major 750 3 3 957 987 0.64 0.66
223rd St Main St 0.8 C D
' Sp 3 3 1142 1221 0.73 1
Wilmington Ave Major 7 on,?23rd 3E Avalon SE 9
• 0 3 3 2216 1029 1.48 69 F B
Ave Alameda St Major 75
0.
223H St Wilmington
15o J52 0.33 0.34 A A
Avalon Blvd Collector 750 1 1
228th S t Main S E 0 47 0.48 A A
• 750 3 3 703 N
Alameda St Lomita Blvd
Sepulveda Blvd Major
• 50 3 3 1155 754 0.77 0.50 C A ONNOMM I eda Blvd 223rd S t Major 7 '
Alameda St Sepulveda 0,d9 A A
• ?50 3 3 706 142 0.47
1.405 F Carson St Major
Alameda St Fwy •69 6fi1 0.4fi 0.44 A A
War 750 3 3 4 A lameda St Carson SI Dominguez St
ONNONawm • 50 2 2 630 418 0.53 0,35 A A
• t Main St Secondary 7
Albertont St Figueroa S 0.36 F A
• 750 2 2 1256 435 1.t�
Main St Avalon blvd Secondary .
Albertont S t � 1039 276 4.87 fl.23 d A
• -91 F Secondary 750 2. 2
Albertoni St
Avalon St SR Fwy
. .• - 750 .3 3 435 49C� 0.19 0.22 A A
Figueroa St � 111tain St � Major
Alondra Blvd 9 g3 544 0.35 0.24 A A
BOB- • Major 750 3 3 7
dm Blvd Main St Avalon Blvd 1
Alan 3 611 903 0.41 0.60 A 8
• Sepulveda Blvd Major 750 3
Avalon Blvd Lomita Blvd � 6Z 0.93 B E
Sepulveda ulveda Blvd 223rd S t Major 750 3 3 928 1392 04
Avalon Blvd eP 1125 1489 0.75-- 0.99 C E
Carson S t � Mapr 750 3 3
Avalon Blvd 223rd St 0.55 0.73 A C
' 750 3 3 1246 1635
Carson 5t 213�h St Major
Avalon Blvd 392 19Q5 0.62 0.86 B D
Avalon Blvd 213th St l 405 Fwy
Ma' r 750 3 3 1
• 3 3 12i 8 2320 0.54 1.03 A F
wmwmvmww• t Del Arno Blvd Major 754 UOMIOONGIONE -_
Avalon Blvd Dominguez S 18 4.85 C D
• 750 3 3 1748. 1945 0.
Oel Ama Blvd Untverstty Dr Major ONOW Avalon Blvd 2054 1860 0,91 0.83 E 0
• ictoria St Major 750 3 3
Avalon Blvd University n r v
• 3 3 136 i 144T d.60 0.64 B B
' A�ertont St Major 750 mwhw
Avalon Blvd Vtctona Si 0.56 •0.64 A 6
0
SR-9i Gardena Blvd Major
75a 3 3 1267 1444
Avalon�vd � 13a 0.66 0.51 e A
• 750 3 3 1479 1
Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd Maur
Avalon Blvd 9 688 0.41 0.46 A A
• Major 754 3 3 �
Broadway Main St V'tctor�a S E j - -
B y 3 581 609 0.39 0.41 A A
• ftertoni St Map 750 3
Broadway
Victoria St 0.38 0.31 A A
SR-9j Gardena Blvd Ma}ar
750 3 3 575
B roadway FWY 0.44 0.32 A A
' � 750 3 3 657 479
Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd Major
Broadway 1988 1979 1.33 1.325 F F
Main St Secondary 750 2 2
Carson St Figueroa S t F
• Avalon Blvd Secondary 754 2 2 2393 2410 1.60 1.34 F
Carson S t Main S t 2014 i.5fi 1.34 F F
Ma'r 750 3 3 2345
Carson St Avalon St l- �wY 1°
Oft"N
• 3 3 1071 1303 0.71 0.87 C 0
yvilmin tan Ave Maloc 754
Carson S t 1-445 Fwy 9 1.07 0.68 F B
Wilmington Ave Alameda St Mapr
750 3 3 1603 1027
Casson St 9 .3 1566 711 1.44 0.48 F A
Santa Fe Ave Major 750 3
Carson St Alameda St 763 0.50 0.51 A A
Major 750 3 3 75
al Ave Del Arna Blvd Turmont St 1 A
Ce n 3 fi 47 S37 4.d3 4.55 A
Universi Dr Major 750 3
Central Ave Turmont St tY F F
. z 2 J468 948 1.63 1.05
• Victoria St Secondary T54
Central Ave Untvecs�ty Or
a I L13UU lil U it vuluklw tt-
Resolution No. 04-089.
Page 89 of 100
q 9 arMIR KI 21 RV-191119 ONIA99191 IMO ROT-MOt"If
10 O"Es WaSN's
N�
one n
Tabla A. - Continued
Future PM Peak Hour Level of Service WIt1i General Plan Growth
a w • r r 0 V w
w • • w w r • r
w N w w w • n w
. Ma'r 750 .3 3 907 1972 0.60 .1.31 B F
Del Amo Blvd Figueroa S t Mom S t �
Del Arno Blvd Main St Avalon Blvd Major 750 3 3 1834 1827 i.22 1-22, F F
Del Am o BN d Avalon St Central Ave Major 750 3 3 1943 2476 1.30 1.65 F F
Amo Blvd Central Ave Wilmington Ave Major 750 3 3 1610 10'25 1.07 0.68 F B
Del Am 9
Dolores S t Sepulveda Blvd 2281h St Collector 750 1 1 134 104 0.30 0.23 A A
FFF'Queroa ol ep
St Lomi ta Blvd S uiveda Blvd Major 750 3 3 358 360 O.Z4 0.24 A A
ep
ue S t Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St Major 750 3 3 592 691 0.39 0.46 A A
Fig toa Sep
u St 223rd St Carson St Major 750 3 3 1048 880 0.700 0.59 B A
Figueroa
Figueroa St Carson S t Torrance Blvd Major 750 3 3 U54 2093 0.97 VO E F
Figueroa S! Torrance Blvd Del Arno Blvd Major 750 3 3 2220 2102 1.48 1.40 F F
9
Fig
ueroa St Del Amo Blvd 1-405 Fwy Major 750 3 3 749 i 472 0.50 0.98 A E
F' ueroa St WS F victoria St Major 75Q 3 3 945 1082 0.72 8 C
� wY
St victoria St SR-91 F Major 750 3 3 705 706 0.47 0.47 A A
Figueroa wY .
ueroa St SR-91 F Gardena Blvd Major 750 3 3 759 813 0.51 0.54 A A
Fig wy
F�guer
oa St Gardena Blvd Alondra Blvd Major 750 3 3 895 659 0.60 0.44 A A
Gardena Blvd Figueroa St Main S t Secondary .750 2 2 287 350 0.24 0.29 A A
Avalon BMvd Se 754 2 2 415 371 0.35 0.31 A A
Gardena Blvd Math St Ava ��'�Y
Main S t Major 150 3 3 1407 899 0.94 0.60 E A
Lom ila Blvd Fig ueroa S t 1 ---
• Avalon Blvd Major 750 3 3 891 866 4.59 0.58 A A
NOMMONEONOW Lomita Blvd Main S t A l
'a Blvd Wilmington Ave Alameda St Major 750 3 3 455 376 0.61 Q.50 B A
Lomita rag
• Sepulveda Blvd Ma'r 750 3 3 1351 1060 0.90 0.72 E G
Main St Lom�la Blvd ep �
i t Sepulveda Blvd 223rd S t Major 7 3 3 1016 1 ZO7 0.72 0.80 C D
Main S ep
Main S t
• 223rd S t Carson S t Major 750 3 3 1410 1611 0.94 1.07 E F
Math St Carson St 213th St Major 750 3 3 2236 2841 1.49 1.89 F F
now i St 213th St Torrance-Blvd Major 750 3 3 1927 2786 1.28 - 1.86 F F
Win
St Torrance Blvd Del Amo Blvd Major 750 3 3 2619 3342 1.75 2.23 F F UMffUWMR-"IRd
• F Ma' r 750 3 3 1114 1273 0.74 0.85 C D
Main St Del Art�to Blvd t- wy �
Wln Broadwa Ma' c 750 3 3 1087 1335 4.12 0.89 c Q
St 1-405 Fwy Y
MMEMMOOMMOUN0 Broadway Victoria St Major 750 3 3 513 629 0.34 0.42 A A
Matra St �
Main St Victoria St Albertoni St Mapr 750 3 .3 1025 *5 0.68 0.68 B' B
• SR- Gardena Blvd Major 750 3 3 1121 959 0.75 0.64 C B
Matra St 91 Fwy
• Mondra Blvd Ma' r 750 `3 3 1055 703 0.70 0.47 C A
Main St Gardena Blvd A amm
Moneta Ave 228th St 223rd St CoUector 750 1 1 144 205 0.32 0.46 A A
St Senora 750 2 2 j252 1261 1.04 1.07 F F
Santa Fe Ave Carson St Dominguez Secondary
Dominguez St Del Amo Blvd Secondary 750 2 2 1348 1023 1.12 0.85 F 0
Santa Fe Ave g
Figueroa St Main St Major 750 3 3 1591 2074 1.06 1.38 F F
Sepulveda Blvd
Avalon Blvd Wor 750 3 3 1411 1536 0.94 1.02 E F
Sepulveda Blvd Malt S t A
Avalon Si
Wilmington Ave Major 750 3 3 1160 1299 0.77 0.87 C D
MON.Sepulveda Blvd A n 9
Sepulveda Blvd Wilmington Ave Alameda St Major 750 3 3 597 765 0.40 0.51 A A
Sepulveda Blvd Alameda St lntermodal Major 750 3 13 875 1217 0.58 0.81 A D
ft 13
Uft Ib 9 W-6
•
• Resolution No. 04-089
Page 90' of 100
Nor
non
=11A
• Table -Continued
Future P11�Weak Hour Leve1 of ServY'c With General Plan Growth
r
'• w � � a w w w w
1 750 2 2 1605 X303 1.34 1.92 F F
Torrance Blvd Figueroa St Main St Secondary
9
• Ave Secondary 75Q Z 2 375 416 0.31 0.35 A A
know~ Non
Unsvecs�ty Dr Avalon St Central Av
to Ave Secondary 750 2 2 337 495 0.28 0.41 A A
rUn7iversiV Dr Cents{Ave Wilmington
•
Major 750 3 3 1341 975 0.89 Oo65 D B
Victoria St Fsgueroa Sl Main St
. � Major 750 3 3 917 509 0.61 0.34 � e A
Victoria S t Maul S t Avalon 8t
. Ave Major 750 3 3 1190 1x51 0.19 0.70 C C
Victoria St Avalon St Tarnc�tl�Av �
• Ma' r 750 3 3 1009 897 0.67 0,60 B A
Victoria S t Tamcltff Ave Cerise!Av e
t
ton Ave Mal or 750 3 3 760 1236 1.01 1.65 F F
Victoria St Central Ave Wilmington o
• da Blvd Major 750 3. 3 547 1348 0.36 0.90 A 0
Wilmington Ave Lomita Blvd Se�u�ve I
. Ma' 754 3 3� 1157 1890 O.Tl 1.26 C F
Wilmington Ave Sepulveda Blvd 223rd St �' .
• Major 750 3 3 1556 3081 x1.04 2.05 F F
now
Wilmington Ave 223rd St t- Y
vVi St Mlal'ar 750 ,3 3 1436� 2887 0.96 1.92 E F
Wilmington Ave i d45 Fwy Carson
• S Ma'r 750 3 3 1403 2868 0.94 1.91 E F
Wilmington Ave Carson St 213th t 10
• Blvd Major 750 3 3 1794 2554 1.20 1.70 F F
Wilmington Ave 2131h St Del Arna 1
• Dr Major 750 3 3 1508 1709 1.a1 1.14 F F
Wilmington Ave Del Amo Blvd Un�vefscty 1
• S t Major 750 3 3 2702 15�fl 1.Z0 0.67 F B
Wilmington Ave Unlversit Or Victoria 1
Resolution No. 04-089
• Page 91 of 100
CARSOH GENERAL PLAN
�SOnr, �r
U - •• l.
.,% „ j
+ lot
cr
r
Gonlann Mod ,fi. s Cam.
Grqt'ntgaf a .
aOtt ao�ra a 13
4 � �
AAcsla Blvd
Mbill tWr St
t •
i Vtctor�a St
o Ulciar14 St
u.i '-• -'
r 1
.c t
an F
u��•,d� �,or a
192nd M
• � 4 �1
a
r
Del Amn elbd 0�« B •. .---
CT
Torrancu 817d. 1
! M4t F
tu ;Domin uar
l
a
at 31h 3t
t •
1,30,F ff. ,o e
r
1.02•tr Carson St �' r
= 1.07,F A 1
22CM S-1
Of wr Pe"98WAC.1%
I viols�rtjtntor Rd
325th St
�. ..
0
�C' C ''.-.. •...•.' O
AA w
T
CL
all
5�pul��dfl 6t,rJ
t ref n MAP HOT TO SOLE
•
. . .• . . .
• r
Lei 114 Pjd
. .. • 4 Level of Serfice E or F
1 110 F Vr,Level of Seriice
yMohaddesAssoddles,117c.
,
W.dur""
vp;� Future AM P Segments
3
Sm urm:C1tR Data.C3tY n C.ar.vm EXH IS IT
JUNE 7.5,=3 /
• Rem lutibn No* 04-089
Page 92 of 100
CARSON GENERAL PLAN
0 -_
..........I
U QA t
f � •
o r
•' anietibsl gird ,
Cl
D��tlana�I•,d ��►
IL ' Its, 1
WAIN
•,
'« •
• t
1 �
a.94,E��
s
Qltu
�+ nt ,. •
. VtCloria 3t 1
Vlctottr St
d
' ► I
• U�Ivarsltt Ot
' ►end 9t
•
c r
A
i
I : ..•••
j�MQ Blvd •«-•
• � r �s` 71���w-two
.25v F
arn el
1 A2.
t 1 4n
130 �, � ��:�, i� � ':l �.� •
'x,30•� r
'1.22•F M-1 room SI r As
F
1A1sF
VOW
�.�1.
oil
'�ltl�i?t1CrlA�t'� �i
lie zza�h s�
INS
t •♦ Q�� fi
V �, l
svd ' MAF HOT TO SCALE
� y
i q
• 3 "�u a 7 '
VS .;.
ve10f 5er ice E or F
11/C LOVe10f as.;rlsc�
1
ates /11 C.-
Meyer, Doha ddes A sso c�' l
aX H
0 ur ell cl e nt S e gm-ents
u tu r e
dOO
• �..�., E
.;,murcjs:C•TiS vita,
S tJrt ?S,!003
UANNUM UtNtUAL
o�
Resolution No. 04-089
Page of. 1
. �._.- � 9 3 0 0
. �,�, .
0 Nis
Aland r&Blvd .
x
Gardens Blvd
r' I..• 0 G a leaf v 0 PoN oPS wo's asol How 4001-w- -0 100 Woo
r
. m a a
.
a A c
, a, � a■R rt a
01 wat nut st rc,.asr•sea •
i
0
Abe t st Vo
� a
vicla lv St e
Victoria St
' 1 f C� •
'•1 0.
1 •' try
Dr
Unlve�s m
n �
t •
• i92nd St
Ito •�
•. M
oft
•
its ,••
W
w t
Oet Amo Btvd
•
Dal Arno BZv •
=L
� +•oano•oa ,�• �
Dominguez St
213th St
214th St •
A'
Carson St
lw--Iw 1w
.. it,e v '
� zzoth st • .. Ave �
"_..~.. ., Carson City Limit
m =3rd St dow ! 5 �........,...:
---'� •; ..` I.NTERS TATE FREEWAY
C� Wats neenter Rd / t Is
228th St __ �
--~-` -�" STATE HIGHWAY
Jr •
r �
[� > N •••• .....• • 111
3m m � 9 ••• MME MAJOR HIGHWAY
23dth St �' S' o� `
U� on I to ;6
ti
.- �• ti ,, PROPOSED MAJOR
V
H1 HAY W
ge utveds 81vd MODIFIED,MAJOR
• HIGHWAY
•. ! t j 1 ■r•■•• SECONDARY HIGHWAY
t r ' •
• COLLECTOR
Lomita Stvd No
.•
l P.
y
,.
Noy
Zeno 0 2600
Feet
PLAN OF STREETS
oeaaiu��c�
� as�rcaa
AND HIGHWAYS
• City of Canon "'WHIT T142
Source.GIS Data, tY
Revised Sept 15,2403
STR EETP I.A N.tVUCD
I'
- Resolution No. 04-089
Page 94 of 100
EXHIBIT "C"
STAFF RECOMMENDED REVISIONS
Study Area Revisions:
3 Mixed Use-Residential, except Avalon Corner General Commercial
6 General Commercial/Light Industrial
14 All perimeter properties facing Low Density Residential to Light Industrial
1.6 Regional Commercial/Public Facilities/Business Park and redraw rear boundaries
of two Heavy Industrial parcels
18 Heavy Industrial/Light Industrial/Low Density Residential/Business Park and
redraw boundaries of two Heavy Industrial parcels
22 Retain Light Industrial with Genera! Commercial on southern parcel
24 Change southern 6 lots to Medium Density Residential
13A General Commercial
Text Revisions:
p. LU-5 .Specific Plans
In addition to the Zoning designations summarized above, there are six Specific.
Plan areas in the City of Carson: -.-Monterey Pines, Arbors at Avalon, and
Carson Town Center.
ps LU,-10 Regional Commercial (RC)
This land use designation is implemented by the CA— Commercial, Automotive
and the CR—Commercial, Regional Zones.
ps LU-9-,11
4.3 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Business Park (BP)
...There are t of Business Park designated in this General Plan: one for
large properties that can be planned and constructed as planned
industrial/business parks and, two, for small properties that can have adequate
landscaping and small scale uses. The small scale BP could allow churches and
other institutional uses with a conditional use Permit, ....
p. LU-12 Mixed Use (MU)
paragraph 2:
EXHIBIT NO. 2
Resolution No. 04--089
Page 95 of 100
...The residential densities will also vary, but are expected to be in the Medium to
High Density ranges, but may not exceed 33 35 du/ac. except for projects for
seniors, affordable, rtransit-oriented development.
paragraph 4: . .
All of Study Areas 8a, 8b, 8c,' 11, and 19 are proposed to be IVIU-13P, with a
combination of regional commercial and business park/limited industrial uses. It
is anticipated that there will be 2.7 million square feet.of regional commercial and
office uses developed at this site as well as a 300,000 square foot hotel. The
regional commercial uses could include entertainment and sports venues,
including a stadium. No residential uses would be allowed.
p. LU-18
LU--IM*,201 Add Public Safety as a Responsible Agency (RA/D)
LU-IM-2-2 Add Public Safety as a RA/D
LU.,IM-,2.3 Add Economic Development as a RA/D
p. LU--30-31
LU-IIVI-9.1 Add Public Safety as a RAID
LU-IM-9.2 Add Public Safety as a RA/D
LU.,IM-,9,4 Add Economic Development as a RAID
LU-IM-,9,s5 Add Economic Development as a RA/D
LU-IM-996 Add Economic Development as a RA/D
p. T(-46 Plan of Streets and Highways
Add a paragraph:
The City of Carson requires full improvements in public rights-of-way pursuant
to the Zoning Ordinance and the City Engineer's Standard Drawings,, Sidewalks
are not required in some industrial areas as shown in Exhibit TI-13a, Non-
sidewalk Areas.
pp. TI-1-53
All tables will be revised as necessary for accuracy and consistency.
p. P-4 Table P-7
Add acreage to:
Bonita Street Mini-Park 1.73 acres: improvements....
Perry Street Mini-Park 1.16 acres: agreement....
CARSON GENERAL PLAN
eso ut on No. 04-089
Page 96 of 100
Non-Sidewalk Areas
ALONORA BLVD
cb
O
on 2'800 0 2'800
c Feet
rn
O
> ,u n
N m
-� z
' r
' A
m
y VICTORIA ST
a '
m '
r
r
z
O
z
m
z
DEL AMO BLVD
,
y AN4IW!1 W Y " -:S:L"' K.`.:iv fL:11:LJ•r:G1S:.�.�
CARSON ST
c '
O
7F.
405 FREEWAY
J
• � z
uarew�nwr.��, :n'�rvmnsmr+r4'riJr2?i i'���
SEPULVEDA BLVD
2
LOMITA BLVD
f
c��q CA~ �
W
GROWWW C7
�eR�CaS o
NonS
m Idewalk Areas
5
Source:GIS Data,City of Carson,June 2004 EXHIBIT T!-13A
June 8,2004
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 97 of 100
EXHIBIT "C"
CITY COUNCIL REVISIONS
Planning
Study Existing Commission Staff City Council
Area General Recommendation Recommendation Revisions
Plan
1 & 2 MD MD Approved by pn"or Concur
GPA
3 GC GC/MD GC/MU-R Concur with staff
recommendarion
4 LD HD Same as Planning Concur
Co mmission
5 LD/MD/HD/
MU R/RC Same as Planning Area SA: Concur for
GC/RC -91 Comission APN Nos.
7335010068,
7335010900, -901, -
902, -903,
7335011900
7337011015,
-016, -032,
-038
Area 5: Concur for
remainin area
6 LI GC/BP/L1 GC/LI Concur with staff
recommendation
7 HI Ll Same as Planning Concur
Commission
8ABC HI/LI MU-BP Same as Planning Concur
Commission
9A LI/HI LUHI Same as Planning Concur
Commission
9B HI/PF LUPF/GC Same as Planning Concur with PF and
Commission CG
Retain HI except LI for
APN Nos.
7339012011, -012, --
017, -019, -020, -021, -
022 and 7339013009, -
016,
-020.1--
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 98 of 100
-021, -024 and
properties located east
of Main Street
(between Albertoni
Street and Victoria
Street) and properties
located west of
Broadway to city
10A LD/HD/GC/ LD/HD/LI Same a Planning- boundary,
s Concur
LI Commission
IOB GC GC/MD Same as Planning'
Entire area GC
Commission
I 0C LI No change Same as Planning Concur
Commission
11 RC/LI MU-BP Same as Planning Concur
Commission
12A LI No change Same as Planning Concur
Commission
12B LI BP Same as Planning Retain existing
COmmission designation with
addition of policy
language restricting
truck intensive
development or use
13 HI GC/LI Same as Planning Western area to be
CO mmission MU-R and eastern area
13A HI to be LI
GC Concur
14 LI/HI No change All LD-facing Concur with Planning
perimeter to LI 0 C onunisson except
DWP right of way to
15 LI HI
No change Same as Planning Concur
Co- M1 ssion
16 LYM/PF RC/BP/PF RC/BP/PFAffl Concur with staff
recommendation
17 HID No change Same as Planning Concur
CO ssion
18 HI HI/LI/LD/Bp Same with small Concur with staff
adjustment of HI recommendation
except 40 acres
Resolution No. 04-089
Page 99 of 100
adjacent to 213th Street
19 GC/LI and Martin Street to BP
MU-BP Same as Planning Concur
20 GC Commission
No change Same as Planning No action. Existing GC
Commission to be retained
21 GC MU-R Same as Planning No action. Existing GC
22 LD/LI LD/BP Co�ssion to be retained
LDALI/GC Concur with Planning
Co mmission except
GC for APN Nos.
22A Ll 7406025020 and -021
LI or BP; same as Retain as LI
23 SeA.LEI 22
BP/LI Same as Planning Retain existing LI
Commission designation with
addition of policy
language restricting
truck intensive
development or use for
area west of Avalon
Blvd. and concur with
LI designation for area
24 LD/GCALI LD/BP east of Avalon Blvd.
LD/BP/MD Retain existing
designation and
provide for further
25 RC stud
MU-R Same as Planning Concur
26 GCAFID/LD Commission
BPALD
Same as Planning Concur
Co nunission
27 LI HI Same as Planning Concur
28
Co mmission
Ll GC Same as Planning Concur
Commission
29 LD GC Same as Planm*ng ain LD
30 LI Commission
GC 1 -
Same as Planning Concur
16 Commission
31 Industrial HIALUM Same as Planning Concur
(LA Co.) Commission
Resolution Nn. 04-089
Page 100 of 100
32 GC MD Same as Planning Concur
33 GC Comrmssion
RC Same as Planning Concur
34 GC Comnussion
No change Same as Planning Concur
35 MD
Conunission
MD Approved by pflor Concur
36 GC GPA
LD Same as Planning Concur
37 Commission
HI LI Same as Planning Concur
Commission
Text Revision
LU-IM-6.8 Analyze the Zoning Ordinance for truck-intensive uses, determine how
such uses may impact other land uses, traffic, and truck routes, and make changes as
necessary to the uses permitted and the review process required. Such changes
include a jobs and fiscal impact report to determine affects of the proposed change to
uses permitted and review process required.
g