The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutAAC Minutes 1993 09/01MCCALL AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 I. ATTENDING: John Wolf Tom Tucker Gordon Colburn Rick Fereday Mike Anderson Jud DuBoer Kim Allen Bud Schmidt II. ISSUES ON ADJOINING LAND: Jud DuBoer advised that he had interest in developing land adjoining the airport and asked the city's intent and commitment to acquire the land for airport purposes as set forth in the long range development plan. The Committee advised of the planned Airport Master Plan update in 1995. The committee directed that Mr. DuBoer be involved in that process in every reasonable manner. Mr.DuBoer also noted the deterioration of fencing between the properties and the need to complete the slash cleanup from the 1989 obstruction removal activities. The staff volunteered to see that this is accomplished immediately. III. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: Staff reported on the Capital budget being prepared for the city and asked if the Committee wished to alter the plan as adopted in June of 1993. Colburn moved that the Committee confirm that the Airport CIP was current and should be included in the City's overall Capital Improvement Plan. Tucker seconded and the motion carried. IV. USFS CLAIM: The Engineer had not reviewed the claim and the committee asked to schedule this on the next month's agenda. V. 1994 AIP: +++++++ The letter from Chuck Sundby dated July 29 is the source document for this discussion (attached); 1. CIVIL AIR PATROL BUILDING: After discussion, the Committee asked staff to discuss future quarters with the CAP wing. Fereday moved that the Council advertise the CAP building for sale to be removed from the airport and to direct staff to secure demolition costs to include in the grant request. Wolf seconded and the motion carried. 2. Electrical power: The Engineer reported that she had secured this cost estimate from Idaho Power. That estimate is $8644. 3. Telephone and power to AWOS: The Engineer reported that she had secured these costs from Idaho Power and GTE, respectively $5000 and $8600. 4. The Committee recommended no action on the relocation of existing power cable behind the new hangar row. 5. Manchester Lease: The Committee recommended that the staff contact Manchester to discuss abandonment of the lease and possible relocation of this lease. 6. Aviation Fuel Island: The Committee asked staff to communicate with Pioneer Aviation to determine a schedule for tank and island removal to ensure coordination with the construction in 1994. A lease addendum may also be required. 7. Water and Sewer mains: The staff advised that the cost of the sewer installation had been budgeted for 1994 by the sewer fund. The staff will propose that the sewer be included in the bid package for the airport work to be completed by the successful bidder, but billed on a separate schedule and paid by the sewer fund. The Committee recommends to the City Council that an Engineering work order for the sewer line be approved to design this line immediately. 8. OLD NDB/ CONCRETE BUILDING: The staff advised that this building is used for euthanising dogs. The antique character of the old NDB was noted and it was suggested that an aviation museum may be interested in acquiring the unit. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. WINDSOCK: Adding arms to have the segmented circle reflect the standard traffic pattern was requested. Staff will handle the request. 2. FLIGHTLINE LEASE: The Committee inquired about the expiration of the bond on repainting the building and on the firms plans for further development. Also noted was the construction debris left in the vicinity of the building. Staff will follow up on this item. VII. MISSION STATEMENT: ++++++++ Staff advised that Mayor Smith requested that the Committee opine on the Mission Statement of the Committee, specifically deleting the Agency membership for the Chamber of Commerce and making the position at -large. Fereday moved that the Committee had no objection to such a change but asked that Mr. Wolf matriculate into that position until the 1994 AIP is concluded, i.e. that the Committee membership remain the same for the next year. Colburn seconded and the motion carried unanimously. VIII. ADJOURNMENT: Without further business, the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Rick Fereday, Secretary , TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINEERING COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 1802 NORTH 33rd STREET BOISE, IDAHO 83703-5897 208-342-5511 • FAX 208-342-5514 July 29, 1993 Mr. Arthur J. Schmidt City Administrator City of McCall P. O. Box 1065 McCall, ID 83638 RE: Airport Project, AIP '04 Dear Bud: During the process of final scope definition for the referenced project and subsequent design evaluation several conflicts with the desired improvements were identified. These conflicts require solution in the field prior to commencing work next summer and,perhaps most significantly, costs for the work need to be identified this summer and fall so they can be included in the FAA Grant Application. These conflicts primarily relate to existing or future utilities, existing structures and current leases on the airport. I will highlight the specific issues in the following paragraphs. The impact of each issue is noted numerically on the attached plan for reference. 1. Civil Air Patrol Building (CAP) - This building needs to be removed and all utility services abandoned outside of the apron work area. The FAA will participate in the cost of the demolition only, not relocations or improvements. Work is required prior to construction. A cost for demolition is needed for the grant. 2. Transformer Building - Existing transformers, enclosures, poles and service lines to the CAP Building, the metal building and the Manchester hangar to the east require removal or relocation as appropriate. Wbrk is required prior to construction. A cost for removal and relocation is needed for the grant. 3. Existing Telephone, Power Cables and AWOS Communication Cables - Buried cables which serve the Scott Hangar and the AWOS will be disturbed by taxiway grading and must be relocated during taxiway construction, not prior to construction. A cost for utility company work is needed for the grant. 4. Existing Telephone and Electric - Buried cables will require relocation at some time in the future but not at this time. It may be prudent to coordinate or arrange this work now as long as we need to discuss other relocations. 5. Manchester Lease - Construction of this apron expansion will require Mr. Manchester to relinquish a portion of the current lease area if the FAA is to participate in construction. This should be resolved prior to preparation of the Grant Application as it will impact the total eligible costs. BOISE • N1cCALL, IDAHO TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINEERING COMPANY Mr. Bud Schmidt July 29, 1993 Page 2 6. Pioneer Aviation Fuel Island - It is our understanding that this fuel island and associated underground tanks will be removed prior to construction. This is an area that requires regrading which can be best accomplished during the overall apron reconstruction project. However, the area is currently leased which creates the same conflict as above. Perhaps Pioneer would relinquish this area once the fuel island is removed. This issue also should be resolved prior to the grant application. 7. Water and Sewer Mains and Services - Future mains and services to serve the new hangars should be installed concurrent with taxiway construction, however, this work is not grant eligible. It is our recommendation that this work be included in the '04 project bid package but as a separate schedule clearly identified as a non -eligible cost. The pros and cons of this can be discussed further. Additionally, our work associated with inclusion as a separate bid schedule is not currently covered by our contract since it also is a non -eligible engineering cost; therefore, a separate work order will be required. This issue perhaps has the highest urgency as it will impact our bid documents and drawing package. 8. Existing Block Building - There is an existing concrete block building that will require removal at some time in the future as this access and parking area develops. This is not critical to this project but does warrant consideration. Kim Allen has held several discussions with Contel and Idaho Power in the last several months so they are aware of the problem and have provided some preliminary costs which were included in the Pre - Application. I believe the actual work required is clear but the way to implement it and the contract and payment format is an issue that the City must finalize. I suggest a meeting with Kim and the affected utility companies to discuss and resolve. The majority of these issues have been discussed at one time or another, however, I thought it prudent to document them in a single correspondence. Kim or I are available to discuss these issues further when you desire to do so. Sincerely, TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINEERING COMPANY Charles P. Sundby, P.E. Project Manager cc: Kim Allen CPS/kja File : 93010-20-200 3-NOS 01 10N - C .1.¢3 1=� S.l`dMl Xbl SS300V bb`0NVH / \ A519 X .5L M/2! • 2661 `L. ,onr t76, — NVid 10](C Id 1` cilOIN(1W T1d00W (AS 00l'Z) NO2Id`d ` O 308V-IN3 (AS 00Z'9) SAVMIXdl 21V9NVH M3N 10112liSN00 (AS 000'CZ) NO&IV 13r M3N 101181SN00 (AS Ogg' lZ) NO2IdV dJ 10(18_15N0038 (AS OS8'S) NO6AV H18ON 30211V1N3 (AS OSti'Sl) A MIXb'1 OM/ N08dV H12lON 10n2LISN0038 93010-FY-94.DWG 0143031 1N31"3-13 >180M