HomeMy Public PortalAbout10) 7G city classification & compCity Council
August 7, 2012
Page 2
5. On June 26, 2012 , the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the
Classification and Compensation Study (Attachment "A").
6. By the July 13, 2012 deadline for proposals, the City received three proposals.
7 . During the week of July 23, 2012, the proposals were reviewed by City staff.
ANALYSIS:
The City of Temple City has not completed a compensation study since 1995. There is no
other record found of the City adopting a fonnal classification study or plan.
Furthennore, that last compensation study was not conducted by an outside consultant but
rather completed by in-house staff. In addition, staff has determined that the list of survey
cities currently used for salary comparison is 12 years old. Current classification
specifications (i.e., job descriptions) have not been reviewed or updated for a number of
years. The objective of a Job Classification and Compensation Study is to ensure
employees are working within their classification, compensated in accordance with City
Council's policies and direction, and have an understanding of the City's expectations for
performance as outlined in their respective job descriptions.
Staff is also in the process of reviewing all the City's Personnel Rules and Regulations,
and will be bringing forward for City Council consideration revised Personnel Rules and
Regulations in December 2012. A current Study will be an integral part of those revised
Personnel Rules and Regulations, and as a result, staff is recommending to the City
Council this Study be complete prior to the adoption of the revised Personnel Rules and
Regulations. In the RFP, the City had requested the Study be completed by September
30, 2012, however all three finns indicated that they could not complete the study within
the proposed timeframe. Since staff will not be asking for approval of the revised
Personnel Rules and Regulations until December 2012, the amount of time to complete
the study by each of the proposers is acceptable.
The review process of the proposals included an independent review by the Economic
Development Manager/Assistant to the City Manager, the Director of Parks and
Recreation and the Administrative Services Director. A numerical scoring sheet was
utilized to assess the proposals which included sections for general comments. The
information utilized to make a recommendation for the consultant to complete the study
is summarized below:
Proposer Cost Timeframe for Average Scores
Completion 100 Possible
Public Sector Personnel Consultants $3 1,500 11 Weeks 82
Ralph Anderson & Associates $33,700 12 Weeks 90
RSG l Re ward Strategy Group) $40,700 14 Weeks 70
Since the amount budgeted in the FY 2012-13 City Budget is $30,000 and staff is not
recommending this contract exceed this amount, the consultants were contacted
City Council
August 7, 2012
Page 3
informally to discuss how their scope of services could be reduced to fall within the not-
to-exceed amount of $30,000. All were willing to consider a reduction in scope to
ensure the project would not exceed $30,000. Based upon the evaluation of the
proposals, all three reviewers scored Ralph Anderson and Associates the highest
primarily for their company reputation, past clients, organization of proposal and method
of completing the project. A copy of the proposal from Ralph Anderson & Associates is
attached (Attachment "8").
Since a budget amendment is not required, staff is recommending that the City Council
accept the proposal from Ralph Anderson & Associates and authorize the City Manager to
enter into a professional services agreement in an amount not-to-exceed $30,000 and
ensure that the scope of services as outlined in the proposal, is not compromised.
CONCLUSION:
In order to ensure the City of Temple City is moving toward best practices in the area of
personnel management, staff will be revising current policies, procedures and practices
between now and the end of the calendar year. An updated Classification and
Compensation Plan, completed by an outside consultant to ensure objectivity, is essential
for moving forward and ensuring employees are working within their classification,
compensated in accordance with City Council's policies and direction, and have an
understanding of the City's expectations for performance as outlined in their respective job
descriptions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for this project in the amount of $30,000 have been budgeted in the FY 2012-13
City Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Request for Proposals (RFP) for City Classification and Compensation Study
8. Proposal from Ralph Anderson & Associates to Conduct a Classification and
Compensation Study
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
NOTICE INVITING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
FOR
CITY CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY
SUBMIT PROPOSALS TO:
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Attachment "A"
ATTN : TRACEY HAUSE , ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
9701 LAS TUNAS DR.
TEMPLE CITY, CA 91780
DEADLINE TO SUBMIT:
FRIDAY , JULY 13, 2012
BY 6 P .M .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 3
BACKGROUND ..................................................................................... 4
OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................... 4
SCOPE OF SERVICES ........................................................................... 5
• Classification Study
• Compensation Study
PROPOSED TIMELINE .......................................................................... 7
NECESSARY QUALIFICATIONS .............................................................. 8
• Prior Experience
• Staff Qualifications
• Contact Person
• Organization and Staffing
PROPOSAL FORMAT ........................................................................... 9
EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS ............................................. 11
• Proposal Review
• Interview
• Professional Services Agreement
GENERAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................... 12
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
CITY CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY
INTRODUCTION:
The City of Temple City is centrally located in the west of San Gabriel Valley
approximately five miles southeast of Pasadena and 13 miles east of downtown
Los Angeles. The City is approximately 3.85 square miles and is surrounded by
the cities of Arcadia, San Gabriel, El Monte, Rosemead, and unincorporated
portions of Los Angeles County. The 2011 State estimate indicates a total
population of 35,673.
The City of Temple City has a Manager-Council form of government, and is a
contract city with 92 employees (36 full-time, 56 part-time) that provide the basic
government services of public works, public safety, planning and community
development, and recreational programs.
BACKGOUND :
The City is comprised of the following departments: Management Services
Department (City Manager, City Clerk, Communications Office), Community
Development Department (Planning Division, Public Safety Division and
Community Preservation Division Housing), Administrative Services
Department (Finance, Risk Management and Human Resources), and Parks
& Recreation (Recreational Classes and Citywide Programs and Events). The
City has a contract City Attorney.
The City has not conducted a Classification and Compensation Study in a
number of years and the scope and level of work performed by City staff
members has changed significantly.
OBJECTIVE :
The City of Temple City seeks to have an updated Classification &
Compensation Plan that recognizes the changes in service performance levels
by City staff. The new Classification & Compensation Plan should ensure proper
grouped classifications with positions requ1nng similar responsibilities,
knowledge , skills and abilities , provide salaries that commensurate with assigned
duties, outline promotional opportunities with recognizable compensation growth,
provide justifiable pay differential between individual classes and maintains parity
with relevant labor markets .
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. Classification Study
The study shall include, but is not limited for the Consultant to:
• Review background materials including organizational charts, budgets,
existing personnel rules, proposed revised personnel rules, and related
information.
• Review City's current classification specifications and analysis for
knowledge, skill, ability, education and experience relevance and
hierarchical consistence, conformity with ADA language relative to
essential job functions (including physical requirements); position
definitions, purpose, distinguishing characteristics, supervision received
and exercised, position duties and special requirements including
licensing and certification requirements.
• Meet with Department Heads and mid-management staff to explain
philosophy and components of study and processes used.
• Conduct orientation and briefing sessions for all employees covered within
scope of study.
• Develop and distribute a job analysis questionnaire to each employee.
• Review and analyze the completed job-related questionnaires.
• Conduct interviews with all employees within scope of study.
• Draft up-to-date class specifications as needed to uniformly reflect
distinguishing characteristics, essential job functions, minimum
qualifications, working conditions, license requirements, regulatory
requirements and standby/call-out responsibilities for all classifications .
• Develop new classes as appropriate.
• Recommend deletion of outdated or unnecessary classes.
• Allocate all employees to an appropriate job class.
• Review various job series in terms of appropriateness.
• Develop and identify viable career progressions within the classification
plan.
• Submit final draft of proposed class specifications for the City's review.
• Prepare final version of all class specifications and recommend
appropriate classification for each employee after the City's review.
• If required, meet with City Council or Ad Hoc Committee appointed by the
City Council to review proposed Classification plan. Format presentation
to the City Council may also be necessary.
• Provide a manual and an electronic version of final copy of class
specifications . Final version should also include an introductory section
that describes class concepts, and provides information about the
distinction of various levels within a class series and other pertinent
information.
" D o c u m e n t p r o c e d u r e s f o r a p p r o p r i a t e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n a n d m a i n t e n a n c e
m a n u a l s .
" P r o v i d e p e r i o d i c s t a t u s r e p o r t s o n p r o g r e s s , a s r e q u e s t e d .
2 . C o m p e n s a t i o n S t u d y
T h e s t u d y s h a l l i n c l u d e , b u t i s n o t l i m i t e d f o r t h e C o n s u l t a n t t o :
" R e v i e w c u r r e n t c o m p e n s a t i o n ( i n c l u d i n g a l l b e n e f i t s ) p r a c t i c e s a n d r e l a t e d
i s s u e s .
" R e v i e w c u r r e n t l i s t i n g o f c o m p a r a b l e c i t i e s a n d r e c o m m e n d a p p r o p r i a t e
c h a n g e s t o C i t y '