HomeMy Public PortalAbout03) Downtown Parking Stategic Plan_2012-08-09 Appendix
APPENDIX A
Background Information
Workman Ave.Workman Ave.Workman Ave.
Las Tunas Dr.Las Tunas Dr.Las Tunas Dr.
Las Tun
a
s
D
r
.
Woodru Ave.Woodru Ave.Woodru Ave.
Su
l
t
a
n
a
A
v
e
.
Lo
m
a
A
v
e
.
Ha
r
t
A
v
e
.
En
c
i
n
i
t
a
A
v
e
.
Oa
k
A
v
e
.
Al
e
s
s
a
n
d
r
o
A
v
e
.
Ro
s
e
m
e
a
d
B
l
v
d
.
Hermosa Dr.
Ro
w
l
a
n
d
A
v
e
.
Go
l
d
e
n
W
e
s
t
A
v
e
.
Ca
m
e
l
l
i
a
A
v
e
.
Pr
i
m
r
o
s
e
A
v
e
.
Co
l
v
e
r
l
y
A
v
e
.
My
d
a
A
v
e
.
City of Temple City
Downtown Specic Plan
Las Tunas East Commercial District
City Center Commercial District
Temple City Blvd. Commercial District
Residential - Commercial District
Las Tunas West Commercial District
Gateway Commercial District
City of Temple City
Community Development Department
9701 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, California 91780
Phone: 626.285.2171
Website: www.templecity.us
Te
m
p
l
e
C
i
t
y
B
l
v
d
.
***Note: Residential - Commercial District areas may be built with multiple family residential at the R-3 standard
or Senior Citizen Housing, with a conditional use permit. Property within the Residential - Commercial District
may also be developed as commercial when combined with a commercially designated lot(s) with frontage
on Temple City Blvd. or Las Tunas Drive.
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
4
|
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
40
|
Al
t
a
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
+
D
e
s
i
g
n
Fi
g
u
r
e
4
-
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
T
e
m
p
le
C
i
t
y
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
Ci
t
y
o
f
T
e
m
p
l
e
C
i
t
y
|
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
Al
t
a
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
+
D
e
s
i
g
n
| 41
Fi
g
u
r
e
4
-
2
W
e
s
t
S
a
n
G
a
b
r
i
e
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
P
l
a
nn
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
4
|
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
46
|
Al
t
a
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
+
D
e
s
i
g
n
Fi
g
u
r
e
4
-
5
L
a
s
T
u
n
a
s
D
r
i
v
e
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
C
r
o
s
s
-
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
4
|
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
52
|
Al
t
a
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
+
D
e
s
i
g
n
Fi
g
u
r
e
4
-
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
B
i
ke
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
APPENDIX B
Parking Counts
SA
T
U
R
D
A
Y
OC
T
O
B
E
R
29
,
20
1
1
12
:
0
0
PM
1:
0
0
PM
2:
0
0
PM
3
:
0
0
PM
4
:
0
0
PM
5
:
0
0
PM
6
:
0
0
PM
7
:
0
0
PM
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Zo
n
e
1 ‐60
3
2
4
34
0
28
8
2
6
0
2
6
6
2
2
3
2
0
4
1
7
8
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Zo
n
e
61
‐12
0
3
9
9
38
5
33
4
2
9
4
2
6
6
2
6
6
2
8
5
2
9
3
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Zo
n
e
12
0
‐13
3
2
7
26
26
2
2
1
8
2
3
3
9
4
9
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
7
5
0
75
1
64
8
5
7
6
5
5
0
5
1
2
5
2
8
5
2
0
Of
f
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
4
8
7
49
0
42
7
3
6
4
3
5
4
2
9
5
2
9
0
2
8
8
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
1
2
3
7
12
4
1
10
7
5
9
4
0
9
0
4
8
0
7
8
1
8
8
0
8
TU
E
S
D
A
Y
OC
T
O
B
E
R
25
,
20
1
1
10
:
0
0
AM
1
1
:
0
0
AM
1
2
:
0
0
PM
1
:
0
0
PM
2:
0
0
PM
3:
0
0
PM
4
:
0
0
PM
5
:
0
0
PM
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Zo
n
e
1 ‐60
1
6
9
1
9
8
2
1
1
2
1
7
23
3
22
5
2
3
5
1
8
6
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Zo
n
e
61
‐12
0
2
4
4
2
7
7
3
1
4
3
1
8
29
1
27
3
2
8
1
2
6
4
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Zo
n
e
12
0
‐13
3
1
5
1
9
1
4
1
5
13
12
9
9
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
4
2
8
4
9
4
5
3
9
5
5
0
53
7
51
0
5
2
5
4
5
9
Of
f
‐St
r
e
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
6
8
3
5
5
42
9
34
6
3
3
4
3
0
5
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
7
6
1
8
5
7
9
0
7
9
0
5
96
6
85
6
8
5
9
7
6
4
10
:
0
0
AM
1
1
:
0
0
AM
1
2
:
0
0
PM
1
:
0
0
PM
2
:
0
0
PM
3
:
0
0
PM
4
:
0
0
PM
5
:
0
0
PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
1
2
3
7
1
2
4
1
1
0
7
5
9
4
0
9
0
4
8
0
7
8
1
8
8
0
8
Tu
e
s
d
a
y
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
7
6
1
8
5
7
9
0
7
9
0
5
9
6
6
8
5
6
8
5
9
7
6
4
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (ON-STREET PARKING) TUESDAY - OCTOBER 25, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1000AM 1100AM 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM
01 00000000
32 42011121
1 3 3 54656686
24 42111210
95 22211111
96 01000000
1 0 7 12247571
1 4 8 35555554
1 4 9 34544564
1 7 1 0 25746445
1 6 1 1 34444443
1 5 1 2 33355456
1 2 1 3 18665094
5 1 4 65555556
1 4 1 5 54798735
7 1 6 36765857
1 3 1 7 10003273
1 4 1 8 67886988
1 3 1 9 7 1 1 654572
8 2 0 55317555
1 0 2 1 43342012
1 0 2 2 00000021
1 0 2 3 01001000
5 2 4 22333322
1 7 2 5 11366655
1 2 2 6 00000000
1 3 2 7 57555666
1 0 2 8 00000000
1 0 2 9 21111111
1 3 3 0 10271222
1 3 3 1 11333233
1 5 3 2 11132301
1 5 3 3 00000000
1 5 3 4 55566565
1 9 3 5 46554335
1 6 3 6 43364774
1 9 3 7 47554633
1 1 3 8 00311432
1 1 3 9 97499763
8 4 0 02321100
1 0 4 1 12375637
1 2 4 2 33322334
1 2 4 3 24134221
1 4 4 4 778556 1 1 6
1 4 4 5 44544642
1 2 4 6 53456252
1 6 4 7 67 1 0 98666
1 2 4 8 00020423
1 0 4 9 64877673
5 5 0 10001000
8 5 1 00001000
1 3 5 2 22000000
1 3 5 3 01000011
1 3 5 4 35458757
1 5 5 5 12525554
1 8 5 6 57689983
1 6 5 7 45556687
1 0 5 8 23314101
1 0 5 9 21426342
1 3 6 0 34834783
706 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 164 191 203 210 221 213 224 178
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 23.23% 27.05% 28.75% 29.75% 31.30% 30.17% 31.73% 25.21%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (ON-STREET PARKING) TUESDAY - OCTOBER 25, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1000AM 1100AM 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM
1 5 6 1 04433247
1 3 6 2 10323211
1 3 6 3 10566555
1 6 6 4 4374857 1 2
1 5 6 5 59765677
1 7 6 6 366865 1 0 9
1 7 6 7 54534444
1 1 6 8 35231345
1 1 6 9 12323222
14 70 6 7 11 5 11 8 12 11
1 1 7 1 24875777
1 2 7 2 47544333
1 2 7 3 13454411
6 7 4 01112134
2 0 7 5 1 0 8775654
1 6 7 6 34579645
1 1 7 7 68584421
1 1 7 8 11110001
1 1 7 9 41112211
1 1 8 0 66022365
1 3 8 1 63866596
1 3 8 2 22222333
1 3 8 3 32344521
18 84 18 14 12 13 16 9 13 12
1 9 8 5 52463553
20 86 4 9 12 12 8 13 9 8
1 3 8 7 66666723
1 0 8 8 43333344
1 0 8 9 14445543
1 5 9 0 289 1 0 7746
14 91 5 8 8 10 5 11 8 9
1 2 9 2 00111112
1 2 9 3 11111232
20 94 11 13 16 15 13 10 10 11
1 8 9 5 689 1 0 9996
1 5 9 6 44 1 1 85133
1 2 9 7 57576565
9 9 8 03321110
1 1 9 9 59956522
1 1 1 0 0 11353212
1 1 1 0 1 75433984
1 3 1 0 2 22233212
1 3 1 0 3 11222012
1 8 1 0 4 1 1 8669 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 7 1 0 5 89799894
1 4 1 0 6 98887797
1 9 1 0 7 77576664
1 2 1 0 8 11121013
1 2 1 0 9 11331100
6 1 1 0 12251030
7 1 1 1 42522120
1 4 1 1 2 12222111
1 4 1 1 3 10001111
1 8 1 1 4 3487 1 0 626
1 9 1 1 5 32342342
1 4 1 1 6 24343485
1 8 1 1 7 22331332
1 3 1 1 8 00010000
1 3 1 1 9 32133312
7 1 2 0 11011100
813 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 223 253 284 290 264 253 258 242
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 27.43% 31.12% 34.93% 35.67% 32.47% 31.12% 31.73% 29.77%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (ON-STREET PARKING) TUESDAY - OCTOBER 25, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1000AM 1100AM 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM
9 1 2 1 01100000
1 3 1 2 2 11123310
1 3 1 2 3 11123111
1 5 1 2 4 01001200
1 6 1 2 5 35432212
1 8 1 2 6 23000011
1 6 1 2 7 11111112
9 1 2 8 11131111
9 1 2 9 44421211
5 1 3 0 00000000
4 1 3 1 00000000
1 2 1 3 2 00010000
1 2 1 3 3 21111021
151 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 15 19 14 15 13 12 9 9
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 9.93% 12.58% 9.27% 9.93% 8.61% 7.95% 5.96% 5.96%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (OFF-STREET PARKING) TUESDAY - OCTOBER 25, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1000AM 1100AM 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM
41 UNMARKED 7 9 8 7 7666
2 ZONE A HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 12 12 11 12 10 11 11 10
2 ZONE B HANDICAP 0 1 1 0 0010
14 UNMARKED 3 5 8 12 77 8 5 3
0 ZONE C HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 6 11 10 8 9 10 9 11
2 ZONE D HANDICAP 0 0 1 0 1000
15 UNMARKED 9 10 13 13 11 10 9 12
0 ZONE E HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
54 UNMARKED 16 20 17 19 19 20 15 22
0 ZONE F HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
22 UNMARKED 10 11 12 6 7 5 8 12
0 ZONE G HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
27 UNMARKED 6 16 15 12 9569
2 ZONE H HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 1000
24 UNMARKED 13 13 14 13 12 10 13 9
2 ZONE I HANDICAP 1 0 1 1 0100
24 UNMARKED 10 12 9 10 12 11 11 12
0 ZONE J HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
26 UNMARKED 13 17 12 13 15 17 22 14
2 ZONE K HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 8 7 9 9 7 9 11 9
2 ZONE L HANDICAP 0 0 1 0 0000
13 UNMARKED 2 2 7 5 5897
0 ZONE M HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
30 UNMARKED 17 18 21 19 25 20 14 12
0 ZONE N HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
23 UNMARKED 17 14 11 14 12 9 10 9
3 ZONE O HANDICAP 3 1 2 1 0101
30 UNMARKED 14 11 11 8 10 11 10 10
0 ZONE P HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 8 10 12 12 10 12 11 12
2 ZONE Q HANDICAP 0 1 1 0 0110
17 UNMARKED 11 11 12 15 13 12 11 10
0 ZONE R HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
13 UNMARKED 8 11 9 10 11 13 13 13
6 ZONE S CHASE 6 6 6 6 6666
6 UNMARKED 4 5 6 6 6665
2 ZONE T HANDICAP 0 0 2 1 1010
12 UNMARKED 11 12 10 8 9 7 10 8
0 ZONE U HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 12 11 8 10 12 11 8 9
0 ZONE V HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
16 UNMARKED 8 6 10 12 14 15 16 14
1 ZONE W HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0111
13 UNMARKED 9 11 10 12 12 12 3 8
0 ZONE X HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
11 UNMARKED 9 10 12 11 12 8 11 6
2 ZONE Y HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
23 UNMARKED 10 10 7 10 11 6 15 19
1 ZONE Z-1 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
30 UNMARKED 24 26 25 24 22 21 19 16
5 ZONE Z-2 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 1100
17 UNMARKED 16 14 17 10 8 15 13 0
2 ZONE Z-3 HANDICAP 1 0 0 0 1010
102 UNMARKED 29 29 27 26 31 27 18 10
3 ZONE Z-4 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
704 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 333 363 368 355 429 346 334 305
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 47.30% 51.56% 52.27% 50.43% 60.94% 49.15% 47.44% 43.32%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (ON-STREET PARKING) SATURDAY - OCTOBER 29, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM 1800PM 1900PM
01 00000000
32 12231330
1 3 3 44556546
24 00010010
95 53301000
96 02211211
1 0 7 72212100
1 4 8 8 1 0 765533
1 4 9 1 3 1 2 987743
1 7 1 0 78744468
1 6 1 1 1 4 1 3 733341
1 5 1 2 1 5 1 5 974343
1 2 1 3 1 0 6466642
5 1 4 67632320
1 4 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 0 67678
7 1 6 89657410
1 3 1 7 76433356
1 4 1 8 1 5 1 3 756533
1 3 1 9 1 4 1 2 876665
8 2 0 96344232
1 0 2 1 77216500
1 0 2 2 12101232
1 0 2 3 10002223
5 2 4 44332000
1 7 2 5 58868756
1 2 2 6 11000000
1 3 2 7 77666577
1 0 2 8 10111100
1 0 2 9 00000111
1 3 3 0 47555330
1 3 3 1 55663252
1 5 3 2 44445332
1 5 3 3 11112232
1 5 3 4 48666564
1 9 3 5 46899954
1 6 3 6 7 1 0 987745
1 9 3 7 44679887
1 1 3 8 33435555
1 1 3 9 11121111
8 4 0 00010001
1 0 4 1 49556464
1 2 4 2 10000000
1 2 4 3 33332121
1 4 4 4 54533413
1 4 4 5 65557343
1 2 4 6 45545435
16 47 7 11 8 9 10 9 6 3
1 2 4 8 8799 1 0 432
1 0 4 9 76766534
5 5 0 00001000
8 5 1 00000000
1 3 5 2 03211111
1 3 5 3 13222222
13 54 13 13 14 14 14 12 13 13
1 5 5 5 8 1 2 1 1 86544
18 56 15 14 15 16 14 15 14 15
1 6 5 7 689 1 1 9894
1 0 5 8 25676332
1 0 5 9 65699764
1 3 6 0 1 0 7412025
706 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 324 340 288 260 266 223 204 178
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 45.89% 48.16% 40.79% 36.83% 37.68% 31.59% 28.90% 25.21%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (ON-STREET PARKING) SATURDAY - OCTOBER 29, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM 1800PM 1900PM
1 5 6 1 1 0 8765574
1 3 6 2 45433343
1 3 6 3 87742256
1 6 6 4 1 6 1 4 5876 1 1 5
1 5 6 5 1 1 9787899
17 66 17 14 7 6 3 10 9 7
1 7 6 7 1 0 977544 1 0
1 1 6 8 86887756
1 1 6 9 35433365
14 70 12 14 11 12 12 12 9 7
11 71 9 9 9 11 4 8 10 10
1 2 7 2 88854355
1 2 7 3 57754587
6 7 4 76112322
20 75 12 14 12 15 15 10 10 8
1 6 7 6 87533453
1 1 7 7 56241176
1 1 7 8 66555883
1 1 7 9 53111333
1 1 8 0 87430015
1 3 8 1 1 4 1 3 7575 1 3 1 3
1 3 8 2 13222322
1 3 8 3 12352100
18 84 13 13 13 10 11 11 11 10
19 85 10 13 5 7 14 5 6 10
20 86 16 18 13 14 12 11 8 12
1 3 8 7 1 0 7554447
1 0 8 8 45666656
1 0 8 9 65774444
1 5 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 7459
14 91 11 9 12 4 7 5 11 10
1 2 9 2 11211111
1 2 9 3 00000111
20 94 14 16 14 8 7 8 13 15
1 8 9 5 767766 1 0 8
1 5 9 6 1 3 985103 1 0
1 2 9 7 97888767
9 9 8 24323510
1 1 9 9 45655921
1 1 1 0 0 13311000
1 1 1 0 1 43413010
1 3 1 0 2 22122211
1 3 1 0 3 44443334
18 104 12 14 12 17 16 10 6 7
1 7 1 0 5 57656775
14 106 11 9 11 8 11 10 7 11
1 9 1 0 7 34533553
1 2 1 0 8 22112331
1 2 1 0 9 21212312
6 1 1 0 01000000
7 1 1 1 00200000
1 4 1 1 2 23321111
1 4 1 1 3 24411212
1 8 1 1 4 1 1 6945753
1 9 1 1 5 22232322
1 4 1 1 6 94231232
1 8 1 1 7 21222203
1 3 1 1 8 11110111
1 3 1 1 9 43655445
7 1 2 0 10000000
813 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 399 385 334 294 266 266 285 293
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 49.08% 47.36% 41.08% 36.16% 32.72% 32.72% 35.06% 36.04%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (ON-STREET PARKING) SATURDAY - OCTOBER 29, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM 1800PM 1900PM
9 1 2 1 00000000
1 3 1 2 2 03430222
1 3 1 2 3 44434111
15 124 5 3 3 2 3 6 10 11
1 6 1 2 5 22220431
18 126 2 4 2 2 3 3 12 15
1 6 1 2 7 23112022
9 1 2 8 10001002
9 1 2 9 5120013 1 0
5 1 3 0 00000000
4 1 3 1 00000000
1 2 1 3 2 12111111
1 2 1 3 3 54784554
151 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 27 26 26 22 18 23 39 49
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 17.88% 17.22% 17.22% 14.57% 11.92% 15.23% 25.83% 32.45%
CA11-1028-2011
TEMPLE CITY (OFF-STREET PARKING) SATURDAY - OCTOBER 29, 2011
SPACES LOCATION TYPE 1200PM 1300PM 1400PM 1500PM 1600PM 1700PM 1800PM 1900PM
41 UNMARKED 4 4 3 4 4 15 17 19
2 ZONE A HANDICAP 1 1 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 9 10 11 12 12 10 8 7
2 ZONE B HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
14 UNMARKED 14 15 14 15 15 13 12 13
0 ZONE C HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 12 12 11 12 12 10 4 3
2 ZONE D HANDICAP 1 0 1 0 0200
15 UNMARKED 15 15 15 13 13 14 11 12
0 ZONE E HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
54 UNMARKED 50 50 31 21 20 14 9 9
0 ZONE F HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
22 UNMARKED 22 22 18 12 11 9 6 7
0 ZONE G HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
27 UNMARKED 24 24 24 17 19 15 18 18
2 ZONE H HANDICAP 2 2 1 1 1000
24 UNMARKED 24 24 24 20 19 15 23 22
2 ZONE I HANDICAP 2 2 0 1 1000
24 UNMARKED 24 24 21 23 22 17 21 20
0 ZONE J HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
26 UNMARKED 26 26 24 22 23 26 19 19
2 ZONE K HANDICAP 2 2 2 1 1000
12 UNMARKED 12 12 7 8 8677
2 ZONE L HANDICAP 2 2 1 1 1000
13 UNMARKED 13 13 11 10 10 6 9 8
0 ZONE M HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
30 UNMARKED 26 26 20 16 14 4 1 1
0 ZONE N HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
23 UNMARKED 20 20 18 8 7 7 16 17
3 ZONE O HANDICAP 3 3 2 0 0111
30 UNMARKED 28 29 16 16 14 17 25 25
0 ZONE P HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 12 12 12 3 4300
2 ZONE Q HANDICAP 1 1 1 0 0000
17 UNMARKED 15 15 14 12 11 8 1 0
0 ZONE R HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
13 UNMARKED 13 13 12 11 11 7 9 8
6 ZONE S CHASE 6 6 6 6 6222
6 UNMARKED 6 6 6 6 6133
2 ZONE T HANDICAP 2 2 1 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 11 11 10 10 9798
0 ZONE U HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
12 UNMARKED 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 11
0 ZONE V HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
16 UNMARKED 15 15 16 16 15 11 10 11
1 ZONE W HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
13 UNMARKED 13 13 13 12 12 11 12 12
0 ZONE X HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
11 UNMARKED 11 11 11 10 10 5 11 11
2 ZONE Y HANDICAP 1 1 0 0 0011
23 UNMARKED 15 15 19 16 15 19 8 6
1 ZONE Z-1 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
30 UNMARKED 17 17 17 15 14 8 5 6
5 ZONE Z-2 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
17 UNMARKED 1 1 1 1 1000
2 ZONE Z-3 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
102 UNMARKED 1 1 1 1 1111
3 ZONE Z-4 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0000
704 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 487 490 427 364 354 295 290 288
100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 69.18% 69.60% 60.65% 51.70% 50.28% 41.90% 41.19% 40.91%
APPENDIX C
Public Workshop Summary
Page 1 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
NOVEMBER 17TH WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
A community workshop focused on soliciting input on parking within downtown Temple City was held
on Thursday, November 17, 2011 from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the Historical Society Hall. An estimated 40‐
60 community members attended representing business owners, employees, residents, and shoppers.
Additionally, City staff, members of the City Council (Mayor Tom Chavez, and Mayor Pro Tem Vince Yu,
Carl Blum, and Cynthia Sternquist), and members of the Public Safety Commission were in attendance.
I. WORKSHOP PURPOSE
The purpose of this workshop was to introduce the project to the community, present existing
conditions parking data in downtown Temple City, educate participants on parking policies and tools for
improvement, and collect feedback from residents and business owners on issues, concerns, and ideas
for improving parking conditions and management. The project study area is focused along Las Tunas
Drive and bound by Sultana Avenue, Baldwin Avenue, Woodruff Avenue, and Workman Avenue.
II. INTRODUCTION & PRESENTATION
Director of Community Development Steven Masura welcomed and thanked the participants for their
attendance and involvement. Mr. Masura provided a few words to introduce the project and
introduced the project team members. Paul Martin and Susan Harden of RBF Consulting and Rick
Willson of CSU Pomona gave a presentation that included an overview of the project, the City’s
Downtown Specific Plan, preliminary findings, and strategic parking management techniques.
GROUP EXERCISE #1: POST‐IT NOTE VISIONING
For the first group exercise, participants were provided with Post‐It notes and asked to identify 3‐4 key
challenges and ideas related to parking in downtown. Once the challenges and issues were written, the
Post‐It notes were placed together on the wall where the facilitators organized the notes by themes.
The purpose of this exercise is to collect input from all participants and allows participants to see and
hear other opinions that are similar or different from other members of the audience.
The categories that were developed during the identification of challenges included:
• Inadequate employee parking
• Time restrictions limit business
Page 2 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
• Employee parking
• Overflow of parking to residential streets
• No parking problem
• Safety
• Enforcement
• Location of parking lots
• Angled parking/no structure
• Addition of a structure
• Better shopping and land uses
The categories that were developed during the
identification of ideas included:
• New parking structure
• New parking lots
• Time restrictions
• Enforcement
• Institute diagonal parking
• Dedicated employee parking areas
• Business owners to enforce employee parking
• Change use of City Council parking spaces to general use
• Improve parking area signge & road striping
• Mange existing parking lots for shared use
• Improve walking and transit options
• Implement paid parking
Preliminary data that was collected on a Tuesday and Saturday in
October 2011 was presented. The preliminary findings indicated that
Saturdays are busier than weekdays. On weekdays, the peak or highest
parking conditions occurred at 2:00 p.m. and the lowest parking
demand occurred at 5:00 p.m. On weekends, the peak parking
conditions occurred at 1:00 p.m. and the lowest parking demand occurred at 7:00 p.m. The data
indicated parking activity is concentrated, and an apparent preference to parking within parking lots and
within one block of the destination downtown. When the parking lots reach full occupancy, overflow
parking occurs on the residential streets, including Cloverly Avenue, Primrose Avenue, Camellia Avenue,
and Kauffman Avenue. The Parking Strategic Plan will assess how to maximize efficiency of existing
parking capacities and the potential for adding more parking to serve downtown. Future analysis for
Page 3 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
this project will also include consideration for existing vacancies, such as the former Alpha Beta Site and
vacant storefronts.
After the Post‐It Note exercise, a presentation on parking management tools was presented to educate
participants on the different types and methods of improving parking conditions. The discussion
included an explanation and photo examples of the following strategic parking concepts:
• Policy Strategies
o Introduce parking pricing
o Modify parking standards
o Revise time restrictions
o Revise in‐lieu fee program
o Incentivize non‐motorized travel such
as walking, transit, and biking
• Program Strategies
o Remote parking for employees
o Staff incentives & mock tickets
o Market/Brand parking areas to make
more appealing
o Mock tickets to serve as warning and
education for users
o First ticket is free
o Free or unrestricted parking on
weekends and holidays
o Dedicate spaces to distinct users
o Shared parking between businesses
o Use valet operations
o Residential parking permit program
• Physical Design Strategies
o Additional surface parking lots
o Parking structure
o Angled parking
o Restripe spaces
o Combine multiple lots
o Improve wayfinding and signage
o Provide a downtown shuttle service
o Improve security in parking lots
Page 4 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
o Establish walking routes
o Improve pedestrian environment
o Create/enhance rear “front doors”
o Provide pedestrian connections/Paths
o Arts program to help create sense of
place
Handouts were provided to all participants that
included a summary of the strategic parking concepts
to be used in as a guide in the second group exercise.
GROUP EXERCISE #2: SMALL GROUP BREAKOUT
Based on the challenges and ideas presented during the Post‐It Note exercise, the three most popular
topics amongst the participants were: Provision of New Parking, Employee Parking, and Time Limits of
Parking Spaces. Following the presentation on strategic parking tools, participants were asked to cluster
in groups by the topic they were most interested in discussing and exploring for a second group
exercise. As participants gathered by topic, they were asked to discuss ideas on specific strategies
and/or locations for parking improvements or other implementation actions. Flip charts and markers
were provided and group roles were assigned. At the end of the exercise, a presenter from each table
shared the results of their table discussions with the rest of the room.
Topic 1: New Parking
• Church lot should be shared with public on weekdays
o Use for City employee parking; City could rent or lease the lot from church
• Vacant lot on Temple City Boulevard between Woodruff and Las Tunas: use for parking lot (buy
or lease)
• More signage needed for shared parking at school district during Farmer’s Market. People don’t
know it is available.
Topic 2: Employee Parking
• Use funeral home on Temple City Boulevard for staff parking
• Evaluate the number of employees, type of business, and hours of operation
• Paid or permit parking for employees
• Safety for employees (improve safety in lots and paths to lots)
• Dedicated stalls in all lots for employees
Topic 3: Timing of Parking Space Restrictions
• Ticket forgiveness for employers
• Drop off spot in front of Women’s Club on Woodruff
Page 5 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
• 1:00 p.m. time is busiest
• One‐hour time limit on Las Tunas
• Three hours in lots – maybe longer on weekends
• Share spaces with businesses
• Supermarket – 20 to 30 minute spaces
• Green curb for some businesses needed – TC
Postal
• More 2‐hour parking needed behind Golden
House since all day parking is allowed
• Use of all‐day parking areas by JAD staff?
• Improve lighting and security for remote all‐
day lots
• Provide business parking/20 minute
parking/loading
• Eliminate staff moving cars every 2 hours
• Dedicate some parking to businesses or parking permits for the owner
General Comments & Ideas
• Eliminate 5 council spaces
• No more restaurants without in‐lieu parking
charges
• Metered parking (as needed use)
• Encourage use of bikes – add bike racks
• Public education (alternatives)
• Three story parking structure: two for
customers, one for employees
• Parking vouchers
• Shuttle
• Consider parking requirements for new businesses (ex. Pet store)
• 2 hour limit restriction not needed all day (only 11:30 to 2:00 and 5:00 to 8:00 p.m.)
• Parallel parking – some users can’t park within the lines!
• Inadequate lighting in some public lots
• Inadequate bike parking = less bicyclists
• Business owners need to enforce employee parking
• Emergency parking needed
• Add 20 to 30 minute parking
• Parking for business owners should be unlimited (time)
Page 6 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
• Parking for tour buses needed
• Resident permit parking program helps
III. NEXT STEPS
Following the workshop, the project team will be conducting stakeholder meetings and creating a
stakeholder survey in December 2011. Field investigations, data collection, data analysis, and mapping
efforts will also be conducted in December. Future parking needs within the downtown area will be
determined based on the field investigations and data collection efforts, along with an evaluation for the
need of additional parking structures or lots and associated preliminary financial feasibility studies.
Based on the future needs and data, a draft Downtown Parking Strategic Plan will be developed and
prepared with City staff review. The Downtown Parking Strategic Plan will be presented to the Public
Safety Commission, Planning Commission, and the City Council, with a goal to finalize the Plan by the
end of April 2012.
IV. PROJECT WEBSITE
Additional project information including all materials from the workshop presentation, handout, and
preliminary data, are available on the project website at:
http://tcparkingstudy.rbfconsulting.info/
V. APPENDIX
Eighteen (18) comment cards were provided and submitted at the close of the workshop. The
comments received included concerns, ideas, and general thoughts on the parking conditions:
1. City bus for TC resident (all ages). Rent parking lot from church on weekday & Saturday
2. Progressive thinking is one important facet to creating a more effective and safe parking plan.
Metered parking and pay to park garages will not only create more available spaces, but
important and needed City revenue too.
3. There comes a point of saturation. The City has to decide how it’s going to treat its residents. Is
Temple City going to sacrifice its residents for the benefit of the business? Let the business
provide for the parking of its employees and customers.
4. Parking permits for owner. 3 Hour parking at least. Only lunch time and dinner time all parking
is full. Even there are a lot of parking spaces available at other time. Customer is nervous about
2 hour limit, so major problem is dinner time.
5. Pay permit for business owner maximum 2. 1 Hour on Las Tunas, 3 Hours at parking lot. Public
parking for employee for both sides of Las Tunas for late off work employee security concern.
Page 7 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
6. On one slide you indicated that the TCUSD scored 0‐50% of use for 124 spaces. Can you be more
accurate? Is the average 5‐10‐20‐30 of the 124?
7. My restaurant at 9608 Las Tunas Drive. Need 2 hour park for another part or even like before
5:00 p.m. 2 hour that fine and I need tour business, need parking for bus.
8. Thought! Why not a 3‐4 story parking garage?? One on each end of Town with shuttle service to
Downtown!
9. No more restaurants until parking issues are resolved. It's not up to the City to supply parking
for restaurants or any other business.
10. No first parking ticket. No parking meter you just put money in and can park a long time.
11. Can City employee parking be moved from across City Hall to TUSD parking lot remote parking
for City employees?
12. Speed up the use of school lot for general/employee parking.
13. Develop parking areas within each block for employees of concerns in the City. Safety and
adequate lighting make this a necessity. We need a five year plan to develop these plans as
businesses enlarge & expand the number of employees.
14. No need for parking ‐ there are no shops to shop here, except the Post Office. No more bridal
shops!! Need more stores where Caucasian people can shop! (Like See's Candy store, private
pharmacy, shoe store, movie theater, china store, have space for dial‐a‐ride).
15. Very important to have offsite parking for employees of businesses. Limit time for parking so
you have more turn over.
16. Better & safer parking for adults who ride bikes/ motorcycles/mopeds/3‐wheeler bikes. People
park in residential driveways & homeowners can't leave home. Ambulance & Fire Dept. access.
Famer's Market parking on Kauffman & Woodruff ‐ has this been addressed? Post office parking
lot could be utilized. Divide each parking block into 3 divisions ‐ owner / employee ‐ residential
& patrons.
17. I understand "dial‐a‐ride" will not take you out of your City to another City unless a doctor
appointment for some groups, seniors need this ride.
18. A suggestion would be to have permits to purchase for business owners for their employees.
Have a specified area for business owners & employee parking.
The following comments were provided during the workshop for the “Ideas” and “Challenges” topics:
IDEAS!
Structure:
• Turn public lots into 2 & 3 story lots.
• Multi‐level parking at former Alpha‐Beta market
• Parking structure
Page 8 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
• Multi‐level parking structure built on Alpha‐Beta empty lot
• Idea – We need a parking garage (2 or 3 levels). This would take street parking away somewhat.
Know these is probably meeting objecting but objections can be changed.
• Develop double deck parking lot
• Trash enclosures need to be closed in no open doors.
Timing:
• Put some one hour parking in lots to keep patrons moving
• 2 Hour limits should change to 3 – 4 hours instead
• Parking lot time limits
• 9608 Las Tunas a Golden House. Change the other half of the parking lot to 2 hour parking.
• Green curbs
Walk, Bike, Bus:
• Could more local people be encouraged to walk or ride bikes to downtown Temple City
• City bus for Temple City resident (all ages)
Paid Parking:
• Metered parking
• Residents should not be charged to park on their own streets
• City can issue pay permit for 2 maximum for each shop. This will make income for City also
benefit for any business need this.
• Street resident permits – 1st: less expensive per year. 2nd: Extra more money maximum
Enforcement:
• Parking enforcement
Diagonal:
• Diagonal vs. parallel parking spaces on streets
• Solution to provide more parking to businesses: If conditions allow, stripe diagonal parking on
Las Tunas Drive.
• More spaces created with head in parking instead of parallel parking on Las Tunas
Page 9 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
Clear Signs, Striping:
• Clear signs identifying where parking is located
• The striping of parking spaces in the street makes it easier for drivers to recognize
Shared:
• Solution: Better management of parking lots to take away spaces from businesses that don't
need them and use them for other businesses
• Rent parking lot from church on weekday and Saturday
Employee Parking:
• Have specific areas for employee parking that are safe and lighted
• Sell permits for business owners to use for employee parking
• Employer responsibility
• Move City employee parking down to TASD lot instead of across the street from City Hall
• Residential property should not be turned into parking areas for business employees or
customers
• Designated parking lot for business employees and owners
• Minimize traffic generation based on type of business
New Lots:
• Change empty lot on Temple City Boulevard to parking north of Las Tunas
• Would not like to see eminent domain used to create additional parking spaces
• City purchase funeral home property
• City buy vacant lots like one on Temple City Boulevard
Council Spaces:
• City Council members have 1 space to park instead of 2.
• Make Council use 5 spaces – not 10!
Page 10 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
CHALLENGES!
Inadequate Business Parking:
• Not enough public parking
• Type of business without enough parking
• Parking for customers of businesses without having to walk a long distance
• Not enough parking in City
• Not enough parking in the right places
• No parking spaces available at certain times for customers of bank
Time Restrictions Limit Business:
• Parking reg. per ITE
• 2 Hours is not enough. Customers will get nervous after 1.5 hours. You want customers here for
shopping dining….not just for specific shopping.
• The limited amount of parking spaces in lots behind businesses makes attracting new/larger
businesses more difficult
• 20 Minutes green curb can be used in front of retail stores
• From Primrose to Temple City Boulevard there is no public parking but the other two sides has
it. City should not consider for restaurant only. After lunch (dinner) time there are a lot of space
but with 2 hour limit it's not practical.
• District rules
Employee Parking:
• Too many cars parked in front of my store because of restaurants (Temple City Boulevard)
• Why do Council members need 10 spaces of reserved parking?
• Business have employee's park on residential streets
• No parking for employees
• Methodist Church not using their own parking lot – Woodruff etc.
• Post office employees should not park in spaces close to post office
• Restaurants take all existing spaces
• Business workers using lots made for them
• Less all day parking lots and workers
• Employee parking for restaurants
• Parking for employees of businesses
• Restaurant employees taking all the street parking Woodruff etc.
• Post office parking is bad. Postal employees take spaces in side lot.
Page 11 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
• Having employees park in designated parking spaces
• Why do City employees park across the street from City Hall?
• Why do employees fill the close in spaces and customers need to do the longer walking?
Parking Not a Problem:
• I've not had a parking problem for the few stores I visit!
Overflow to Residential Streets:
• Cars parked in front of private driveways illegally to access businesses
• Overflow parking on residential streets
• Side streets used to get away from main street parking
• Parking on both sides of street on Woodruff block pulling out of the Historic Society parking lot.
This probably happens at others places.
Safety:
• Public/traffic interaction
• Safety from criminal element
• Safety
• Speed in parking lots
• Stop signs not being observed
Enforcement:
• Enforcement
Location of Parking Lots:
• Too hard to get from rear parking spaces to front of stores
• Access to property from parking lot
• Don't know where all the available parking is located
Fewer All‐Day Parking:
• Fewer all day parking
• Too many unlimited use spaces
• More limited parking spaces. Public parking lot shouldn't have unlimited parking.
Page 12 of 12
TEMPLE CITY DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT
Angled/No Structure Parking:
• No parking garage/structures
• Parallel parking is difficult on Las Tunas. Angle parking will be easier.
• Old school thinking!
• Newer and innovative parking needed
• No Bike Parking
Structure:
• Parking lot turned into structure
• Availability of real estate for park
Better Shopping and Land Uses:
• We need better shopping. Too many of the same.
• No shopping in downtown. I have no problem finding a parking space.
APPENDIX D
Parking Occupancy Exhibits
Tuesday Parking Occupancy Exhibits
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 10:00 AM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 10:00 AM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 11:00 AM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 11:00 AM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 12:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 12:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 1:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 1:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 2:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 2:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 3:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 3:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 4:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 4:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Tuesday 5:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Tuesday 5:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
1
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
Saturday Parking Occupancy Exhibits
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 12:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 12:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 1:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 1:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 2:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 2:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 3:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 3:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 4:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 4:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 5:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 5:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 6:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 6:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
SU
L
T
A
N
A
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
HA
R
T
A
V
E
LO
M
A
A
V
E
EN
C
I
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
AL
E
S
S
A
N
D
R
O
A
V
E
OA
K
A
V
E
CL
O
V
E
R
L
Y
A
V
E
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
BIDWELL S
T
HERMOSA
D
R
WORKMAN AVE
Area 1/2 Saturday 7:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
A
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1A
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
E LAS TUNAS BLVD
WORKMAN AVE
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
A
V
E
TE
M
P
L
E
C
I
T
Y
B
L
V
D
CA
M
E
L
L
I
A
A
V
E
KA
U
F
F
M
A
N
A
V
E
GO
L
D
E
N
W
E
S
T
A
V
E
AG
N
E
S
A
V
E
RO
W
L
A
N
D
A
V
E
WOODRUFF AVE
BA
L
D
W
I
N
A
V
E
Civic Center
Area 2/2 Saturday 7:00 PM Public Parking Occupancy
DOWNTOWN PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN°0 200 400100
Feet
11
/
1
4
/
1
1
J
N
1
0
-
1
0
8
1
7
8
T
e
m
p
l
e
_
C
i
t
y
_
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
_
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
_
1
B
_
1
1
x
1
7
.
m
x
d
D
J
Source: Eagle Aerial 2011 Exhibit 1B
Legend
0% = 55% Occupied
56% = 70% Occupied
71% = 85% Occupied
86% = 100% Occupied
APPENDIX E
Financial Analysis Worksheets
DR
A
F
T
#1
.
0
TE
M
P
L
E
CI
T
Y
,
CA
Re
v
e
n
u
e
/
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
‐
PA
R
K
I
N
G
PR
I
C
I
N
G
January 9, 2012
IN
C
O
M
E
Y
R
1
Y
R
2
Y
R
3
Y
R
4
Y
R
5
Y
R
6
Y
R
7
Y
R
8
Y
R
9
Y
R
1
0
Y
R
1
1
Y
R
1
2
Y
R
1
3
Y
R
1
4
Y
R
1
5
Y
R
1
6
Y
R
1
7
Y
R
1
8
Y
R
1
9
Y
R
2
0
T
O
T
A
L
In
c
o
m
e
:
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
St
a
l
l
s
(W
e
e
k
d
a
y
s
)
1
7
9
,
3
9
0
$
18
4
,
7
7
2
$
19
0
,
3
1
5
$
19
6
,
0
2
4
$
20
1
,
9
0
5
$
20
7
,
9
6
2
$
21
4
,
2
0
1
$
22
0
,
6
2
7
$
22
7
,
2
4
6
$
23
4
,
0
6
3
$
24
1
,
0
8
5
$
24
8
,
3
1
8
$
25
5
,
7
6
7
$
26
3
,
4
4
0
$
27
1
,
3
4
3
$
27
9
,
4
8
4
$
287,868 $ 296,504 $ 305,399 $ 314,561 $ 4,820,274 $
In
c
o
m
e
:
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
St
a
l
l
s
(S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
s
)
5
0
,
9
2
4
$
52
,
4
5
2
$
54
,
0
2
5
$
55
,
6
4
6
$
57
,
3
1
5
$
59
,
0
3
5
$
60
,
8
0
6
$
62
,
6
3
0
$
64
,
5
0
9
$
66
,
4
4
4
$
68
,
4
3
8
$
70
,
4
9
1
$
72
,
6
0
5
$
74
,
7
8
4
$
77
,
0
2
7
$
79
,
3
3
8
$
81,718 $ 84,170 $ 86,695 $ 89,296 $ 1,368,348 $
In
c
o
m
e
:
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
St
a
l
l
s
(W
e
e
k
d
a
y
s
)
4
3
6
,
6
1
5
$
44
9
,
7
1
3
$
46
3
,
2
0
5
$
47
7
,
1
0
1
$
49
1
,
4
1
4
$
50
6
,
1
5
6
$
52
1
,
3
4
1
$
53
6
,
9
8
1
$
55
3
,
0
9
1
$
56
9
,
6
8
4
$
58
6
,
7
7
4
$
60
4
,
3
7
7
$
62
2
,
5
0
9
$
64
1
,
1
8
4
$
66
0
,
4
1
9
$
68
0
,
2
3
2
$
700,639 $ 721,658 $ 743,308 $ 765,607 $ 11,732,008 $
In
c
o
m
e
:
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
St
a
l
l
s
(S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
s
)
1
1
7
,
1
3
5
$
12
0
,
6
4
9
$
12
4
,
2
6
9
$
12
7
,
9
9
7
$
13
1
,
8
3
6
$
13
5
,
7
9
2
$
13
9
,
8
6
5
$
14
4
,
0
6
1
$
14
8
,
3
8
3
$
15
2
,
8
3
5
$
15
7
,
4
2
0
$
16
2
,
1
4
2
$
16
7
,
0
0
7
$
17
2
,
0
1
7
$
17
7
,
1
7
7
$
18
2
,
4
9
3
$
187,967 $ 193,606 $ 199,414 $ 205,397 $ 3,147,462 $
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
To
t
a
l
I
n
c
o
m
e
78
4
,
0
6
4
$
80
7
,
5
8
6
$
83
1
,
8
1
4
$
85
6
,
7
6
8
$
88
2
,
4
7
0
$
90
8
,
9
4
5
$
93
6
,
2
1
3
$
96
4
,
2
9
9
$
99
3
,
2
2
9
$
1,
0
2
3
,
0
2
6
$
1,
0
5
3
,
7
1
7
$
1,
0
8
5
,
3
2
8
$
1,
1
1
7
,
8
8
8
$
1,
1
5
1
,
4
2
5
$
1,
1
8
5
,
9
6
6
$
1,
2
2
1
,
5
4
7
$
1,258,192 $ 1,295,938 $ 1,334,816 $ 1,374,861 $ 21,068,092 $
OP
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
/
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
(o
f
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
)
3
6
,
5
9
1
$
37
,
6
8
9
$
38
,
8
1
9
$
39
,
9
8
4
$
41
,
1
8
3
$
42
,
4
1
9
$
43
,
6
9
2
$
45
,
0
0
2
$
46
,
3
5
2
$
47
,
7
4
3
$
49
,
1
7
5
$
50
,
6
5
1
$
52
,
1
7
0
$
53
,
7
3
5
$
55
,
3
4
7
$
57
,
0
0
8
$
58,718 $ 60,479 $ 62,294 $ 64,163 $ 983,214 $
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
(1
0
ho
u
r
s
pe
r
da
y
/
3
0
0
da
y
s
)
2
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
22
2
,
4
8
0
$
22
9
,
1
5
4
$
23
6
,
0
2
9
$
24
3
,
1
1
0
$
25
0
,
4
0
3
$
25
7
,
9
1
5
$
26
5
,
6
5
3
$
27
3
,
6
2
2
$
28
1
,
8
3
1
$
29
0
,
2
8
6
$
29
8
,
9
9
5
$
30
7
,
9
6
4
$
31
7
,
2
0
3
$
32
6
,
7
1
9
$
33
6
,
5
2
1
$
346,617 $ 357,015 $ 367,726 $ 378,757 $ 5,804,000 $
Sw
e
e
p
i
n
g
:
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
on
l
y
2
,
8
0
3
$
2,
8
8
7
$
2,
9
7
4
$
3,
0
6
3
$
3,
1
5
5
$
3,
2
4
9
$
3,
3
4
7
$
3,
4
4
7
$
3,
5
5
1
$
3,
6
5
7
$
3,
7
6
7
$
3,
8
8
0
$
3,
9
9
6
$
4,
1
1
6
$
4,
2
4
0
$
4,
3
6
7
$
4,498 $ 4,633 $ 4,772 $ 4,915 $ 75,317 $
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
1
,
7
2
3
$
1,
7
7
5
$
1,
8
2
8
$
1,
8
8
3
$
1,
9
3
9
$
1,
9
9
7
$
2,
0
5
7
$
2,
1
1
9
$
2,
1
8
3
$
2,
2
4
8
$
2,
3
1
6
$
2,
3
8
5
$
2,
4
5
7
$
2,
5
3
0
$
2,
6
0
6
$
2,
6
8
4
$
2,765 $ 2,848 $ 2,933 $ 3,021 $ 46,297 $
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
/
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
i
t
y
:
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
on
l
y
36
,
9
3
5
$
38
,
0
4
3
$
39
,
1
8
4
$
40
,
3
6
0
$
41
,
5
7
1
$
42
,
8
1
8
$
44
,
1
0
2
$
45
,
4
2
5
$
46
,
7
8
8
$
48
,
1
9
2
$
49
,
6
3
8
$
51
,
1
2
7
$
52
,
6
6
0
$
54
,
2
4
0
$
55
,
8
6
8
$
57
,
5
4
4
$
59,270 $ 61,048 $ 62,879 $ 64,766 $ 992,458 $
Mi
n
o
r
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
/
J
a
n
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
:
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
on
l
y
5
,
9
7
8
$
6,
1
5
7
$
6,
3
4
2
$
6,
5
3
2
$
6,
7
2
8
$
6,
9
3
0
$
7,
1
3
8
$
7,
3
5
2
$
7,
5
7
3
$
7,
8
0
0
$
8,
0
3
4
$
8,
2
7
5
$
8,
5
2
3
$
8,
7
7
9
$
9,
0
4
2
$
9,
3
1
4
$
9,593 $ 9,881 $ 10,177 $ 10,482 $ 160,630 $
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
‐
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
on
l
y
6
,
9
0
6
$
7,
1
1
3
$
7,
3
2
7
$
7,
5
4
6
$
7,
7
7
3
$
8,
0
0
6
$
8,
2
4
6
$
8,
4
9
4
$
8,
7
4
8
$
9,
0
1
1
$
9,
2
8
1
$
9,
5
6
0
$
9,
8
4
6
$
10
,
1
4
2
$
10
,
4
4
6
$
10
,
7
5
9
$
11,082 $ 11,415 $ 11,757 $ 12,110 $ 185,568 $
Pa
y
st
a
t
i
o
n
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
/
d
e
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
‐
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
6
5
,
9
8
5
$
67
,
9
6
5
$
70
,
0
0
3
$
72
,
1
0
4
$
74
,
2
6
7
$
76
,
4
9
5
$
78
,
7
9
0
$
81
,
1
5
3
$
83
,
5
8
8
$
86
,
0
9
5
$
88
,
6
7
8
$
91
,
3
3
9
$
94
,
0
7
9
$
96
,
9
0
1
$
99
,
8
0
8
$
10
2
,
8
0
2
$
105,887 $ 109,063 $ 112,335 $ 115,705 $ 1,773,042 $
Pa
y
st
a
t
i
o
n
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
/
d
e
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
2
6
,
3
9
4
$
27
,
1
8
6
$
28
,
8
4
1
$
29
,
7
0
7
$
30
,
5
9
8
$
31
,
5
1
6
$
32
,
4
6
1
$
33
,
4
3
5
$
34
,
4
3
8
$
35
,
4
7
1
$
36
,
5
3
5
$
37
,
6
3
2
$
38
,
7
6
0
$
39
,
9
2
3
$
41
,
1
2
1
$
42,355 $ 43,625 $ 44,934 $ 46,282 $ 681,214 $
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
To
t
a
l
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
3
9
9
,
3
1
5
$
41
1
,
2
9
5
$
39
5
,
6
3
1
$
43
6
,
3
4
2
$
44
9
,
4
3
3
$
46
2
,
9
1
5
$
47
6
,
8
0
3
$
49
1
,
1
0
6
$
50
5
,
8
4
0
$
52
1
,
0
1
5
$
53
6
,
6
4
6
$
55
2
,
7
4
7
$
56
9
,
3
2
7
$
58
6
,
4
0
6
$
60
3
,
9
9
9
$
62
2
,
1
2
0
$
640,785 $ 660,007 $ 679,807 $ 700,201 $ 10,701,740 $
OW
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
(O
f
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
)
3
,
6
1
7
$
3,
7
2
6
$
3,
8
3
7
$
3,
9
5
2
$
4,
0
7
1
$
4,
1
9
3
$
4,
3
1
9
$
4,
4
4
8
$
4,
5
8
2
$
4,
7
1
9
$
4,
8
6
1
$
5,
0
0
7
$
5,
1
5
7
$
5,
3
1
2
$
5,
4
7
1
$
5,
6
3
5
$
5,804 $ 5,978 $ 6,158 $ 6,342 $ 97,189 $
Ba
n
k
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
7,
5
7
9
$
7,
8
0
6
$
8,
0
4
1
$
8,
2
8
2
$
8,
5
3
0
$
8,
7
8
6
$
9,
0
5
0
$
9,
3
2
1
$
9,
6
0
1
$
9,
8
8
9
$
10
,
1
8
6
$
10
,
4
9
1
$
10
,
8
0
6
$
11
,
1
3
0
$
11
,
4
6
4
$
11
,
8
0
8
$
12,162 $ 12,527 $ 12,903 $ 13,290 $ 203,652 $
Pa
y
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
De
b
t
‐
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
6
8
,
5
6
9
$
68
,
5
6
9
$
68
,
5
6
9
$
68
,
5
6
9
$
68
,
5
6
9
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 342,845 $
Pa
y
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
De
b
t
‐
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
3
2
,
1
9
8
$
32
,
1
9
8
$
32
,
1
9
8
$
32
,
1
9
8
$
32
,
1
9
8
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 160,990 $
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
To
t
a
l
O
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
11
1
,
9
6
3
$
11
2
,
2
9
9
$
11
2
,
6
4
5
$
11
3
,
0
0
1
$
11
3
,
3
6
8
$
12
,
9
7
9
$
13
,
3
6
9
$
13
,
7
6
9
$
14
,
1
8
3
$
14
,
6
0
8
$
15
,
0
4
7
$
15
,
4
9
8
$
15
,
9
6
3
$
16
,
4
4
2
$
16
,
9
3
5
$
17
,
4
4
3
$
17,966 $ 18,505 $ 19,061 $ 19,632 $ 804,676 $
==
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
==
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
============ ============== =================
NE
T
O
P
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
I
N
C
O
M
E
27
2
,
7
8
6
$
28
3
,
9
9
2
$
32
3
,
5
3
8
$
30
7
,
4
2
5
$
31
9
,
6
6
9
$
43
3
,
0
5
1
$
44
6
,
0
4
1
$
45
9
,
4
2
4
$
47
3
,
2
0
6
$
48
7
,
4
0
3
$
50
2
,
0
2
4
$
51
7
,
0
8
3
$
53
2
,
5
9
8
$
54
8
,
5
7
7
$
56
5
,
0
3
2
$
58
1
,
9
8
4
$
599,441 $ 617,426 $ 635,948 $ 655,028 $ 9,561,676 $
AS
S
U
M
P
T
I
O
N
S
Gr
o
s
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
at
10
ye
a
r
s
$8
9
8
,
8
4
1
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
st
a
l
l
s
2
6
5
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
at
10
ye
a
r
s
$4
5
4
,
9
7
0
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
st
a
l
l
s
4
2
4
Ow
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
at
10
ye
a
r
s
$6
3
,
2
1
8
To
t
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
St
a
l
l
s
‐
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Po
t
e
n
i
a
l
6
8
9
Ne
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
an
n
u
a
l
i
z
e
d
at
10
ye
a
r
s
$3
8
0
,
6
5
4
Es
c
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
@ 3.
0
%
1
1
.
0
3
1
.
0
6
0
9
1
.
0
9
2
7
2
7
1
.
1
2
5
5
0
8
8
1
1
.
1
5
9
2
7
4
0
7
4
1
.
1
9
4
0
5
2
2
9
7
1
.
2
2
9
8
7
3
8
6
5
1
.
2
6
6
7
7
0
0
8
1
1
.
3
0
4
7
7
3
1
8
4
1
.
3
4
3
9
1
6
3
7
9
1
.
3
8
4
2
3
3
8
7
1
1
.
4
2
5
7
6
0
8
8
7
1
.
4
6
8
5
3
3
7
1
3
1
.
5
1
2
5
8
9
7
2
5
1
.
5
5
7
9
6
7
4
1
7
1
.
6
0
4
7
0
6
4
3
9
1
.
6
5
2
8
4
7
6
3
2
1
.
7
0
2
4
3
3
0
6
1
1
.
7
5
3
5
0
6
0
5
3
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
wi
t
h
Lo
w
e
r
Co
s
t
Pe
r
Ho
u
r
$
0
.
7
5
13
4
,
5
4
3
$
38
,
1
9
3
$
32
7
,
4
6
1
$
87
,
8
5
1
$
To
t
a
l
I
n
c
o
m
e
58
8
,
0
4
8
NE
T
O
P
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
I
N
C
O
M
E
*
(
$
0
.
7
5
/
h
r
)
76
,
7
7
0
.
0
0
$
Te
m
p
l
e
Ci
t
y
CA
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Re
v
e
n
u
e
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
‐
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Mo
d
e
l
90
0
A
M
1
0
0
0
A
M
1
1
0
0
A
M
1
2
0
0
P
M
1
3
0
0
P
M
1
4
0
0
P
M
1
5
0
0
P
M
1
6
0
0
P
M
1
7
0
0
P
M
1
8
0
0
P
M
1
9
0
0
P
M
H
R
S
ENFORCE
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
We
e
k
d
a
y 26
5
T
O
T
A
L
VE
H
I
C
L
E
S
PA
R
K
E
D
75
83
1
0
2
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
0
8
1
1
0
1
1
5
1
0
4
9
4
1,021.0
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
OC
C
U
P
I
E
D
28
.
2
%
31
.
3
%
3
8
.
5
%
4
4
.
9
%
4
2
.
3
%
4
0
.
8
%
4
1
.
5
%
4
3
.
4
%
3
9
.
2
%
3
5
.
3
%
On
‐St
r
e
e
t
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y 26
5
T
O
T
A
L
VE
H
I
C
L
E
S
PA
R
K
E
D
13
4
1
4
9
1
6
6
18
4
1
7
5
1
4
4
1
2
6
1
0
5
9
3
1
2
3
1
2
9
1,399
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
OC
C
U
P
I
E
D
50
.
6
%
5
6
.
2
%
6
2
.
5
%
81
.
4
%
7
7
.
4
%
6
3
.
7
%
5
5
.
8
%
4
6
.
5
%
4
1
.
2
%
5
4
.
4
%
5
7
.
1
%
Of
f
‐St
r
e
e
t
We
e
k
d
a
y 42
4
T
O
T
A
L
VE
H
I
C
L
E
S
PA
R
K
E
D
20
7
23
0
2
5
5
2
6
7
2
5
9
3
2
9
2
5
0
2
4
7
2
3
2
2
0
8
.
8
2,485
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
OC
C
U
P
I
E
D
48
.
8
%
54
.
2
%
6
0
.
1
%
6
3
.
0
%
6
1
.
1
%
7
7
.
6
%
5
9
.
0
%
5
8
.
3
%
5
4
.
7
%
4
9
.
2
%
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y 42
4
T
O
T
A
L
VE
H
I
C
L
E
S
PA
R
K
E
D
29
0
3
2
2
3
5
8
39
8
4
0
1
3
5
5
3
0
6
2
9
9
2
3
8
2
5
0
2
4
7
3,218
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
OC
C
U
P
I
E
D
68
.
4
%
7
6
.
0
%
8
4
.
5
%
93
.
9
%
9
4
.
6
%
8
3
.
7
%
7
2
.
2
%
7
0
.
5
%
5
6
.
1
%
5
9
.
0
%
5
8
.
3
%
Fi
g
u
r
e
s
in
RE
D
in
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
ho
u
r
s
an
d
oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
i
e
s
(e
.
g
.
,
90
%
of
ne
a
r
e
s
t
su
r
v
e
y
e
d
ho
u
r
)
.
1,
0
2
1
1,
3
9
9
12
5
4
2,
4
8
5
3,
2
1
8
30
2
1
LE
A
K
A
G
E
:
RE
V
E
N
U
E
HO
U
R
S
LO
S
T
AS
RE
S
U
L
T
OF
PR
I
C
I
N
G
3
0
%
LE
A
K
A
G
E
:
NE
T
RE
V
E
N
U
E
HO
U
R
S
7
0
%
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
We
e
k
d
a
y
s
pe
r
ye
a
r
25
1
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
s
pe
r
ye
a
r
52
0.
7
5
$
1.
0
0
$
1.
2
5
$
1.
5
0
$
To
t
a
l
on
‐st
r
e
e
t
we
e
k
d
a
y
re
v
e
n
u
e
ho
u
r
s
19
2
,
2
0
3
$
25
6
,
2
7
1
3
2
0
,
3
3
9
$
38
4
,
4
0
7
$
To
t
a
l
on
‐st
r
e
e
t
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
re
v
e
n
u
e
ho
u
r
s
54
,
5
6
1
$
72
,
7
4
8
9
0
,
9
3
5
$
10
9
,
1
2
2
$
To
t
a
l
of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
we
e
k
d
a
y
re
v
e
n
u
e
ho
u
r
s
4
6
7
,
8
0
1
$
62
3
,
7
3
5
7
7
9
,
6
6
9
$
93
5
,
6
0
3
$
To
t
a
l
of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
re
v
e
n
u
e
ho
u
r
s
12
5
,
5
0
2
$
16
7
,
3
3
6
2
0
9
,
1
7
0
$
25
1
,
0
0
4
$
To
t
a
l
Re
v
e
n
u
e
ho
u
r
s
by
ra
t
e
be
f
o
r
e
le
a
k
a
g
e
TO
T
A
L
ON
‐ST
R
E
E
T
SA
T
U
R
D
A
Y
RE
V
E
N
U
E
HO
U
R
S
DU
R
I
N
G
EN
F
O
R
C
M
E
N
T
HO
U
R
S
(9
a
m
‐
6p
m
)
HO
U
R
S
OF
EN
F
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
TO
T
A
L
OF
F
‐ST
R
E
E
T
WE
E
K
D
A
Y
RE
V
E
N
U
E
HO
U
R
S
(M
‐
F)
DU
R
I
N
G
EN
F
O
R
C
M
E
N
T
HO
U
R
S
(9
a
m
‐
6p
m
)
TO
T
A
L
OF
F
‐ST
R
E
E
T
SA
T
U
R
D
A
Y
RE
V
E
N
U
E
HO
U
R
S
DU
R
I
N
G
EN
F
O
R
C
M
E
N
T
HO
U
R
S
(9
a
m
‐
6p
m
)
TO
T
A
L
ON
‐ST
R
E
E
T
WE
E
K
D
A
Y
RE
V
E
N
U
E
HO
U
R
S
DU
R
I
N
G
EN
F
O
R
C
M
E
N
T
HO
U
R
S
(9
a
m
‐
6p
m
)
DR
A
F
T
#1
TE
M
P
L
E
CI
T
Y
,
CA
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
January 9, 2012
MA
J
O
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
AS
S
U
M
P
T
I
O
N
S
‐
BP
M
&
Wa
l
k
e
r
Da
t
a
Ba
s
e
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
Am
o
u
n
t
‐
Pe
r
St
a
l
l
An
n
u
a
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
(O
f
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
)
:
St
a
l
l
s
pe
r
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
1
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
co
s
t
/
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
86
.
3
0
$
Pa
y
s
t
i
o
n
s
Ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
fo
r
on
‐st
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
2
7
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Co
s
t
27
.
0
0
$
Co
s
t
pe
r
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
8
,
0
0
0
$ per unit
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
/
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
/W
a
t
e
r
/
S
e
w
e
r
8
7
.
1
1
$
Co
s
t
to
In
s
t
a
l
l
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
1
,
0
0
0
$ per unit
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
28
.
0
0
$
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
‐
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
Si
g
n
a
g
e
750 $ per unit
Sw
e
e
p
i
n
g
6.
6
1
$
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
‐
Mi
s
c
.
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
fo
r
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
1
3
,
5
0
0
$ per unit
Mi
n
o
r
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
/
J
a
n
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
1
4
.
1
0
$
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
an
n
u
a
l
2,490 $ per unit
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
8.
5
3
$
Ca
r
r
y
i
n
g
Co
s
t
5
YRS @ 5%
Ba
n
k
Ch
a
r
g
e
s
11
.
0
0
$
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
2.
5
0
$
Co
s
t
of
me
t
e
r
sy
s
t
e
m
(i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
)
238,500 $
Re
s
e
r
v
e
s
fo
r
re
p
l
a
c
m
e
n
t
an
d
re
p
a
i
r
3
%
of
Gr
o
s
s
O
n
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
of
an
y
co
l
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
‐
si
g
n
a
g
e
1
9
,
8
7
5
$
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
of
an
y
co
l
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
‐
Ha
n
d
h
e
l
d
1
5
,
9
0
0
$
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Sp
a
c
e
s
To
t
a
l
De
b
t
to
ca
r
r
y
fo
r
fi
v
e
ye
a
r
s
2
7
4
,
2
7
5
$
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
re
v
e
n
u
e
st
a
l
l
s
2
6
5
To
t
a
l
De
b
t
@ 5%
fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
342,844 $
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
re
v
e
n
u
e
st
a
l
l
s
4
2
4
An
n
u
a
l
ex
p
e
n
s
e
ov
e
r
5 ye
a
r
s
6
8
,
5
6
9
$
To
t
a
l
re
v
e
n
u
e
st
a
l
l
s
68
9
En
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
(s
y
s
t
e
m
)
St
a
l
l
s
pe
r
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
‐
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
4
0
To
t
a
l
st
a
l
l
s
en
f
o
r
c
e
d
68
9
Pa
y
s
t
i
o
n
s
Ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
fo
r
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
1
1
To
t
a
l
en
f
o
r
c
m
e
n
t
of
f
i
c
e
r
s
(6
da
y
s
)
(1
of
f
i
c
e
r
pe
r
22
5
st
a
l
l
s
)
3
Pa
y
s
t
i
o
n
s
Ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
fo
r
Ot
h
e
r
Ar
e
a
s
0
To
t
a
l
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
ho
u
r
s
(p
e
r
da
y
)
(9
A
M
‐
6P
M
)
24
Co
s
t
pe
r
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
8
,
0
0
0
$ per unit
As
s
u
m
e
d
ho
u
r
l
y
ra
t
e
fo
r
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
30
Co
s
t
to
In
s
t
a
l
l
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
1
,
0
0
0
$ per unit
# en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
da
y
s
30
0
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
‐
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
Si
g
n
a
g
e
750 $ per unit
Co
s
t
pe
r
da
y
in
me
t
e
r
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
(e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
)
$
72
0
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
‐
Mi
s
c
.
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
fo
r
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
1
3
,
5
0
0
$ per unit
Co
s
t
pe
r
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
ye
a
r
$
21
6
,
0
0
0
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
an
n
u
a
l
2,490 $ per unit
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
Co
s
t
s
fo
r
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
(2
0
1
2
)
Ca
r
r
y
i
n
g
Co
s
t
5
YRS @ 5%
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
Co
s
t
s
fo
r
pa
r
k
i
n
g
lo
t
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
st
a
f
f
(2
0
1
2
)
Co
s
t
of
me
t
e
r
sy
s
t
e
m
(i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
)
95,400 $
Ne
t
co
s
t
s
pe
r
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
ye
a
r
(w
h
e
n
pr
i
c
i
n
g
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
)
21
6
,
0
0
0
$
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
of
an
y
co
l
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
‐
si
g
n
a
g
e
7
,
9
5
0
$
On
e
ti
m
e
co
s
t
of
an
y
co
l
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
‐
Ha
n
d
h
e
l
d
2
5
,
4
4
0
$
To
t
a
l
De
b
t
to
ca
r
r
y
fo
r
fi
v
e
ye
a
r
s
1
2
8
,
7
9
0
$
To
t
a
l
De
b
t
@ 5%
fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
160,988 $
An
n
u
a
l
ex
p
e
n
s
e
ov
e
r
5 ye
a
r
s
3
2
,
1
9
8
$
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
Co
s
t
Mo
d
e
l
:
On
‐st
r
e
e
t
Pa
y
St
a
t
i
o
n
Co
s
t
Mo
d
e
l
‐
Of
f
‐st
r
e
e
t
Te
m
p
l
e
Ci
t
y
,
CA
Re
v
e
n
u
e
/
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
‐
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Pr
i
c
i
n
g