The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About10) 9B Congestion managementCity Council August 21 , 2012 Page 2 3 . On October 28 , 2010 , the LACMTA adopted their latest Congestion Management Program (CMP). The attached draft Resolution No . 12-4846 (Attachment "A ") is the C ity 's self-certification for the City 's 2012 Local Development Report (LOR) (Attachment "B"). 4 . On August 6 , 2012 , a Public Hearing Notice was published in the Temple City Tribune. ANALYSIS: The passage of Proposition 111 in 1990 provided an increase in the State Gas Tax to fund regional transportation improvements (Streets and Highways Code , Section 21 05) and created the CMP to monitor regional transportation conditions. The state legislature required the LACMTA to establish a CMP, which would annually monitor local j urisd ictions to determ i ne if they were in compliance with the CMP. Conformance with the CMP assures that local agencies are providing transportation improvements to offset the traffic congestion resulting from new development. If a city does not conform to the CMP , that city 's share of the Gas Tax increase provided by Proposition 111 may be w ithheld and allocated to the County to be used on regional transportation projects. Temple City 's FY 2012-13 share is approximately $954 ,000. The CMP requires that certain provisions be included in the City 's Zoning Code to address traffic congestion , which may be associated with new development. The CMP also requires an annual monitoring of pre-designated traffic corridors . In Temple City, the only CMP designated route is Rosemead Boulevard. CONCLUSION: At this time , the City Council is asked to consider adoption of the annual self- certification Resolution. The City is in full compliance with the CMP in that all of the development review requirements have been codified into the Zoning Code and all monitoring has been completed or is scheduled for completion as required. FISCAL IMPACT: Conformance wi th the Congestion Management Program will allow the Ci ty to receive the State Gas Tax funds pursuant to Proposition 111 which will amount to approximately $954,000 for the Fiscal Year ( FY) 2012-13. City Council August 21 , 2012 Page 3 ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution No. 12-4846 B . Local Development Report RESOLUTION NO. 12-4846 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP ) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 DRAfT WHEREAS, CMP Statute requires the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA"), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County , to annually determine that the County and Cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements ; and WHEREAS, LACMTA requires submittal of the CMP Local Development Report by September 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 21, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City of Temple City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 2010 CMP adopted by the LACMTA Board on October 28, 2010 . 1. By June 15, of odd-numbered years , the City of Temple City has and will continue to conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System chapter. 2. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management chapter. 3. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program , consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program chapter. 4. The City of Temple City has adopted a Local Development Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the Draft 2004 CMP . This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City of Temple City with transportation improvements , and demonstrates that the City of Temple City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan consistent with the LACMT A Board adopted 2003 Short Range Transportation Plan. SECTION 2 . That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority . The City Clerk shall enter this Resolution into the book of original resolutions . Resolution No. 12-4846 Page 2 PASSED , APPROVED AND ADOPTED on th is 21st day of August, 2012 . MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution , Resolution No. 12-4846, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of August, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN : City Clerk Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- City of Temple City Date Prepared : August 10 ,2012 2012 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2011-MAY 31,2012 Contact: Adam L. Gu li ck Phone Number: 626-285-2171 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2011 DEFICIENCY PLAN SUMMARY * IMPORT ANT: All "#value!" cells on this page are automatically calculated. Please do not enter data in these cells. DEVELOPMENT TOTALS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residentia l Group Quarters COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) Freestanding Eating & Drinking NON-RET AIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Lodging Industrial Office (less than 50 ,000 sq.ft.) Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) Office (300 ,000 sq .ft. or more) Medical Government Institutional/Educa ti onal University(# of students) OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ENTER IF APPLICABLE ENTER IF APPLICABLE EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT TOTALS Exempted Dwelling Units Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1 ,OOOs) Dwelling Units 1.00 0 .00 0.00 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 0.00 0.00 0 .00 1,000 Net Sq.Ft.2 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 Daily Trips 0.00 0.00 2 0 2. Net square feet is the difference between new development and adjustments entered on pages 2 and 3. Page 1 City o f T empl e City 2012 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2011 ·MAY 31,2012 Date Prepared: August 10, 2012 Enter data for all cells labeled "En t er." If there are no data for that category, enter "0 ." PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Single Family Res id ential 21 .00 Multi-Family Residential 9.00 Group Quarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0 .00 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0 .00 NON-RET AIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Square Feet Lodging 0 .00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0 .00 Office (50 ,000-299 ,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (300 ,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0 .00 Government 0 .00 Institutional/Educatio nal 0 .00 University(# of students) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily Trips (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (Ente r "0" if none ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 EN T ER IF APPLICABLE 0 .00 Page2 C ity of T emple Ci t y 2012 CMP Local Deve l opm ent Report Reporting Period: JUN E 1, 20 11 ·MAY 31,2012 Dat e Prepared : Au gust 10, 2012 Enter data for all cells labeled "Enter." If there are no data for tha t category, enter "0 ." PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IM PORTANT : Ad ju st ments may be claimed only f or 1 ) development per mits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the report ing per iod, and 2) demolition of any structu re wit h the reporting per iod . RESIDE NTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwe lli ng Un its Si ngle Family Res identia l 20 .00 Mul ti-Family Residential 9.00 Group Q uarters 0.00 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 G ross Squar e Feet Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Freestanding Eati ng & Drinking 0.00 NON-RET AIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1,000 Gross Squ are Feet Lodging 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Office (less than 50 ,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 Office (50 ,000-299,999 sq .ft.) 0.00 Office (300 ,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 Medical 0.00 Government 0.00 Ins titutional/Educationa l 0.00 University(# of studen ts) 0.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description Daily T rips (Attach addit ional sheets if necessary) 'Enter "0" if none EN TER IF APPLICAB L E 0.00 EN TER IF APPLICAB L E 0.00 Page 3 Date Prepared: August 10 ,2012 2012 CMP Local Development Report Reporting Period: JUNE 1, 2011 ·MAY 31,2012 Enter data for all cells labeled "Ente r." If there are no data for that category, enter "0 ." PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) Low/Very Low Income Housing High Density Residential Near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments Near Rail Stations Development Agreements Entered into Prior to July 10, 1989 Reconstruction of Build ings Damaged due to "calamity" Reconstruction of Buildings Damaged in Jan . 1994 Earthquake Total Dwelling Units Total Non-residential sq . ft. (in 1 ,OOOs) Exempted Development Definitions: 2 1 ol ~I ~I ~I ~I 2 0 Dwelling Units Dwelling Units 1,000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1 ,000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1,000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1 ,000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 1. Low/Very Low Income Housing : As defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows : -Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size . Page4 -Very Low-Income: eq ual to or less than 50% of the County median income , with adjustments for family size . 2 . High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: Development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger sta tion and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance . A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: Mixed-use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station , if more than half of the la nd area , or floor area , of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: Projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10 , 1989 . 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any res ide ntial or non-residential structure which is damaged or destroyed , to the extent of> or= to 50% of its reasonable value , by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal , state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the loca l jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. Th ese locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LDR .