HomeMy Public PortalAbout9C City Fees for PWCity Council
October 16, 2012
Page 2
4. On April 28, 2011, RCS completed the staff assessment and presented the final
report, Cost of Services Study -Fiscal Year 2010-2011 (Attachment "8"), to
supervisory staff.
5. On June 28, 2011, the City Council conducted a Public Hearing and adopted
Resolution 11-4757 which established: a Master Fee Schedule (Attachment "C")
for parking fines and City fees to defray costs for general financial services;
general community development services (including planning, business regulation,
building and safety, community preservation, animal control); general engineering
services; and parks and recreation.
6. On October 4, 2011, the City obtained the services of RBF Consulting to conduct a
downtown parking study and strategic plan, and a city-wide traffic calming study
and master plan, both of which are currently in progress.
7. On December 6, 2011, the City Council approved adding Chapter 11 (Shopping
and Laundry cart Containment, Retrieval, and Abatement Ordinance) to Title 4
(Law Enforcement) of the Temple City Municipal Code regarding the prevention
and unauthorized removal of shopping carts from retail/commercial premises and
facilitating the retrieval of abandoned carts on public property. The approved
ordinance required business owners to develop a Cart Containment and Retrieval
Plan (Attachment "D") to be reviewed and approved by the City.
8. On June 27, 2012, City staff developed a Special Event Application (Attachment
"E") which was designed to provide applicants a review and approval process for
proposed special events within the City.
9. On July 1, 2012, the City entered into an agreement for consultant services with
Transtech Engineers Inc., for building code and public works/engineering services.
10. On July 12, 2012, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Temple City
Tribune newspaper to notify interested parties and advise residents of the Planning
Commission's meeting of July 24, 2012.
11. On July 24, 2012, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing
and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the Parking
Concession Agreements code amendment and adopt the Negative Declaration.
12. On August 7, 2012, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider
adoption of Ordinance No. 12-959, which created Section 9290.5 Parking
Concession Agreements of the Temple City Municipal Code, and introduced the
draft ordinance for first reading.
City Council
October 16, 2012
Page 3
13 . On August 14, 2012, RBF Consulting presented their downtown parking study
findings and preliminary recommendat ions at a Special Joint Meeting between the
City Council, Planning Commission and Public Safety Commission.
14. On August 28, 2012, the City Council conducted a public hearing for second
reading and adoption of Ordinance No . 12-959.
15. On September 27, 2012, the code amendments for Section 9290 .5 Parking
Concession Agreements went into effect.
16. On October 4, 2012 a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Temple City
Tribune newspaper to notify interested parties and advise the residents of this
public hearing .
17. On October 9, 2012 a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Temple City
Tribune newspaper to notify interested parties and advise the residents of this
public hearing.
ANALYSIS:
The revised Master Fee Schedule , as noted in Exhibit "1" of the attached Resolution No.
12-4863 (Attachment "A"), includes proposed fees that are intended to offset current
costs incurred by the City to provide public works and engineering review, parking
concession agreements, grocery and laundry cart retrieval plan review, and special event
review services. The proposed fees are based on a time and materials analysis
(Attachment "F") that includes average hours spent by City staff and support personnel
(i.e ., Transtech Engineering Inc.) to process applications for development projects that
require : excavation, construction , encroachment, and engineering plan review; parking
concession agreements; grocery and laundry cart plan review; and special event review
services.
The proposed fees are based on the current hourly rates for pertinent staff that provide
i nput in the review of said services, and are intended to account for the actual cost of
services provided by the City.
Staff is recommending fees for the following services not covered by the existing Master
Fee Schedule :
1. Public Works/Engineering Fees
The Cost of Services Study -Fiscal Year 2010-2011 provided unit costs for
many services performed by City staff; however, because staff did not perform
any public works and/or engineering review services (most public works and
engineering review services were provided by the Los Angeles County
City Council
October 16, 2012
Page 4
Department of Public Works), the fees for those types of services were not
identified in the RCS cost study. Transtech Engineering Inc. is now providing
most of the aforementioned services at a lesser cost to the City and in a more
expedient manner. Unfortunately, because the City had not adopted a fee
resolution identifying public works and/or engineering review services, the cost
has been incurred by the City from the General Fund.
Public works and engineering review services encompass a wide range of
excavation, construction, and encroachment activities within the City. Projects
also have great variation in frequency and intensity of said activities. Therefore,
staff is recommending that various fees, ranging from less than $100 to more
than $5000 be established for public works and/or engineering review services
provided by the City. A complete list of proposed fees for the Time and Materials
Analysis for Public Works/Engineering Review is provided in Attachment "F".
2. Parking Concession Agreements Fee
In order to address parking shortages in the City for commercial properties, the
City Council recently established a Section 9290.5 in the TCMC relating to
Parking Concession Agreements. Parking Concession Agreements allow new
businesses and property owners to enter into an agreement with the City to
receive an On-site Parking Reduction in exchange for certain transportation
related improvements and/or pay an off street parking mitigation fee. Another
option is that a property owner or business could build excess parking in
exchange for a Development Standards Reduction.
Staff is recommending that the review of the new Parking Concession
Agreements would be similar to the review time for a Zone Variance, since most
of the time staff would be reviewing situations where property owners are short
on parking. Therefore, staff is recommending that a fee of $1,740.00 be
established for a Parking Concession Agreement.
3. Grocery and Laundry Cart Retrieval Plan
Under the provisions of the Shopping and Laundry Cart Containment, Retrieval,
And Abatement Ordinance, retail or other commercial uses providing cart service
are required to submit a Cart Retrieval and Containment Plan to the City. This
plan sets forth a program to ensure that carts are not removed from their
premises and a retrieval plan if they are removed.
Each plan will require a staff review to ensure that it is complete and adequate.
Staff is recommending that the review of the Cart Retrieval and Containment
Plan would be similar to the review time for a CUP Condition Monitoring fee,
since most staff time would be incurred in reviewing the proposed containment
City Council
October 16, 2012
Page 5
plan and monitoring instances where carts are left abandoned throughout the
City. Staff is recommending that a fee of $520.00 be established for a Cart
Retrieval and Containment Plan.
4. Special Event Application
In order to ensure that special events within the City are safe and comply with
City and State regulations regarding traffic and public health, staff created the
Special Event Application. The application is designed to provide event
coordinators with information regarding the requirements (i.e., site plan and route
map, parking plan, Americans With Disabilities Act awareness, security
information, marketing and advertising, entertainment and related activities,
alcohol, food concession or preparation, restrooms, waste management,
insurance, hold harmless agreements, city department review and approval,
business vendor license, and medical evacuation plans) for planning a special
event in Temple City.
Each plan will require a staff review to ensure that it is complete and adequate.
Staff review of the Special Event Application would generally consist of three
hours of review by the City's public safety officer, public safety and services
manager, and traffic engineer. Therefore, staff is recommending that a fee of
$375.00 be established for review of the Special Event Application regardless of
approval or denial of the event.
CONCLUSION:
Consistent with direction given by the City Council to update City services and increase
transparency, staff has conducted an analysis to determine the costs incurred by the
City in the delivery of public works and engineering review, parking concession
agreements, grocery and laundry cart retrieval plan review, and special event review
services. Based on the analysis, staff is recommending a revision of the Master Fee
Schedule to offset the costs currently borne by the City. The approval of attached Fee
Resolution and revised Master Fee Schedule, as noted in Exhibit "1" of the attached
Resolution No. 12-4863 (Attachment "A"), would allow City Departments/Divisions to
defray costs incurred for services provided by the City to the public.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The estimated increase in revenues to the General Fund as a result of adopting the
attached Resolution related to the proposed fee schedule is approximately $50,000. These
estimated revenues are accounted for in the General Fund Fiscal Year 2012-13 City
Budget.
City Council
October 16, 2012
Page 6
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Draft Resolution 12-4863
B. Master Fee Schedule (adopted June 28, 2011)
C. Cost of Services Study for the City of Temple City, CA Fiscal Year 2010-2011
D. Cart Containment and Retrieval Plan
E. Special Event Application
F. Time and Materials Analysis for Public Works/Engineering Review
ATTACHMENT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 12-4863
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE
CITY CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES TO DEFRAY
COSTS FOR GENERAL FINANCIAL SERVICES; GENERAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INCLUDING PLANNING,
BUSINESS LICENSE, BUILDING AND SAFETY, COMMUNITY
PRESERVATION, ANIMAL CONTROL, AND PARKING PENALTIES,
GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES;
PARKING CONCESSION, AND PARKS AND RECREATION
SERVICES.
WHEREAS. the C1ty Council of the City of Temple City desires to defray the costs for prov1drng
certam serv1ces; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered a cost allocation plan and
comprehensive user fee study based on the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 personal, operating, equipment and
material usage costs, and costs charged by other cities; and
WHEREAS, the vanous departments have provided to the City Council a list of recommended
fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on October 161
h and November
61h 2012 to cons1der the updated Fee Schedule
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the C1ty of Temple Crty, does hereby resolve. fmd,
determine. and other as follows.
SECTION 1. Crty Council Resolution No. 11-4757, adopted June 28, 2011 to establish fees for
general f1nanc1al services; general community development services including plannrng, busrness license,
building and safety. community preservation, animal control, and parking penalties ; general engineenng
services, and parks and recreation services is hereby rescinded as of the effective date of this Resolution
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines, based upon the analysis set forth in the
staff report dated October 16. 2012. that fees and charges set forth m the Master Fee Schedule, as noted in
Exhibit "1" of the attached Resolution No. 12-4863 (Attachment "A"), attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, are in an amount reasonably necessary to recover costs of providing the service, review, and
documentation for with such fee or charge IS levied or authorized to be levied.
SECTION 3. The fees and charges set forth above and incorporated herein by reference shall be
adJusted on an annual basrs to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index. The City Council finds and
determines that utilizing the annual percent change in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers in
the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside metropolitan statistical area, as published by the United States
Government Bureau of Labor Statistics, (CPI) is a suitable equivalent measure for determining the annual
1ncrease in the reasonable cost of services provided by the City. Therefore, the annual CPI adjustment of
each fee and charge shall be determined as follows· Calculate the percentage movement between April of
the previous year and March of the current year in the CPI then increase each fee or charge by said
percentage amount and round off to the nearest one dollar. provided, however, that no CPI adjustment shall
decrease any fee or charge. The City shall review all fees and charges at least every three fiscal years to
ensure that no fee or charge exceeds the reasonable cost of providing services. Where a change rn
c1rcumstances results m the reduction of the cost of providing a particular service. the C1ty shall adjust the
corresponding fee or charge to reflect the actual cost of providing the service Where a change rn
Circumstances results in the increase of the cost of providrng a particular service in excess of the CPl. the
City may adjust the corresponding fee or charge to reflect the actual cost of providing the service.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shalf certify to the passage and adoption of thrs Resolution and it shall
thereupon take effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 161h day of October, 2012.
Resolution No 114755
Page2
ATTEST:
Peggy Kuo, C1ty Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM·
Eric S. Vail, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ss
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY)
Mayor Vincent Yu
I hereby cert1fy that the foregotng resolution, Resolution No. 124863, was duly passed. approved and
adopted by the C1ty Counc1l of the City of Temple City at a regular meet1ng held on the 16n' day of October.
2012, by the follow1ng vote.
AYES·
NOES.
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councllmember-
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT "C"
COST OF SERVICES STUDY
for the
City of Temple City, CA
Fiscal Year 2010-2011
Publication Date: April 28, 2011
Copyright, 2011 by Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or copied in any
form or by any means -graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or
information storage and retrieval systems -without written permission of:
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C
Fullerton, California 92831
(714) 992-9020
REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS, L.L.C.
2545 Chapman Avenue, Suite 103
Fullerton, California 92831
June 23, 2011
Jose Pulido, City Manager
City of Temple City
9701 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, CA 91781
Dear Mr. Pulido,
(714) 992-9020
This letter transmits the revised Summary Schedule for the Cost of Services Study that
RCS has prepared for the City. This Summary Schedule has been revised to coordinate
with Phase I of the Master Fee Resolution prepared by staff.
Sincerely,
~ I fl ~ /?. d L~.-r<..-i ·'~~'-(:.'""
RICK KERMER
President
CITY OF TEMPLE CrTY, CAUFORNIA
SCHEDUlE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
FISCAL YEAR 2010..11
POSSIBLE
TOTAL TOTAL PROFRJ PCT.RECOVERY HEW
IU!Fif SERVICE 111LE REV$1UE CDIT !SUBSIDY) CURRENT StJGGESU.O REVENUE
S-010 BUILDING PLAN CK & INSPECTION $584,000 $518,811 $86,389 112.8"" 100.0% $0 (1)
S-025 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE $0 $100,000 (1100,000) 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
S·030 MUNI.COOE COMPLIANCE PLN CK & INSP. 10 $18,982 ($1U62) 0.0% 100.0% 119,000
S-Q99 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT $43 $8,082 ($11,019) 0.5" 100,0'11. $~.000 -
S-100 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: R-1 ZONe $7,299 $12,597 ($5,298) 57.9% 100.0% 53,500 ~
5·101 CONDITIONAL USE PERt.li: All OTHER $7,299 115,200 ($7,901) 411.0% 100.0% $5,300 ••
S-102 CUP MODIFICATION: R-1 ZONE $405 $898 ($491) 45.2% 100.0% $0 •
S-103 CUP MODIFICATION: All OTHER $2,025 $5,928 ($3,901) 34..2% 100.0% $2,300 ..
5·104 CUP CONDfTION MONITORING $0 19,093 (19,093) 0.0% 100.0% 19,100
5·105 ZONE VARIANCE: R·1 ZONE 11,300 $8,756 (15,458) 19.2% 100.0% 14,100 ..
S-107 ZONE VARIANCE: All OTHER ZONES 11,856 $8,756 ($4,800) 28.0'1' 100.0% 13.800 .,
S-109 ZONE VAR.MOOIFICAllON: R-1 ZONE $244 11,185 (1941) 20.8% 100.0% so •
S-112 ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: OTHER ZONES $405 $1,185 ($780) 34.2% 100.0% so '
S-114 ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: MINOR $182 $288 (1108) 80.4% 100.0% $0 f.
5-118 APPEALS 1182 1933 (1771) 17.4"" 100.0% $0'
S-118 GENERAL PlAN AMENDMENT $976 $5,428 ($4,451) 18.0% 100,0% $0'
S-120 ZONE CHANGE $811 $5,428 ($4,815) 14.8% 100.0% $0 t
S-121 GEN.PL.AN AMEND. l ZONE CHANGE 11.82.5 18,885 (15,080) 24.3% 100.0% so •
S-123 RES'l PLND DEV: PROVISIONAL PLAN $1,822 $7,533 (15,911) 21.5% 100.0% $!1,900
S-125 RES'L PLND DEV: PRECISE PLAN $1,426 $7,533 (111,107) 1U% 100.0% $6,100
5-126 TEMPORARY SIGN/BANNER REVIEW so $44,700 ($44,700} 0.0% 100.0% 133,500 -
5-127 SIGN REVIEW $1,890 $5,668 ($3,776) 33.4% 100.0% $3,800
5-128 SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW 10 $495 ($495) 0.0'1 100.0% 10 t
S-129 SITE PLAN REVIEW-MINOR $2,050 $1,574 $478 130.2-4 100.0% ($500)
S-130 SITE PLAN REVIEW.WUOR $12,300 $58,680 (544,380) 21.7% 100.0% $44,400
S-135 SITE PlAN REVIEW-APPEAL $0 $3,500 (13.500) 0.0% 100.0% 12,100 ..
S-141 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $5,176 $14,4111 (JU42) 35.9% 100.0% $9,200
5-143 TENTAllVE TRACT MAP $3,554 $8,7112 ($5,238) 40.4% 1110.0% 15,200
S-144 TENTAlWE MAP MODIFICATION 1244 11,233 (1989) 19.11% 100.0% $()f.
S-145 FINAL MAP $888 $2,595 ($1,82&) 37.2% 100.0% $1,800
S-147 TIME EXTENSION $732 $1,297 (S565) 56,4% 100.0% $800
S-150 SUBDIVISION MAP AMENDMENT so $972 (1972.) O.O'IIo 100.0% $()f.
S-152 LOT COMBINATION 1244 $647 (1803) 28.8% 100.0% $01
S-154 LOT UNE ADJUSllo1ENT -MINOR S325 $847 (1522) 38.4% 100.0% SOt
S-156 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM CEQA $875 $1.133 ($458) 59.8% 100.0% $500
S-157 NEGATIVE (EIINIRON.) DECLARATION $1,350 $3,400 ($2,050) 39.7% 100.0% $2,100
S-158 EIRJMITIGATED NEGATIVE DEC. REVIEW so so $0 100.0% 100.0% so·
S-180 PUBUC CONVENIENCE & NECESSITY so $1,500 ($1,500) 0.0% 100.0% IUOO
5-164 PlANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION $0 13,500 ($3,500) 0.0% 100.0% $2.100 ..
S-188 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $0 so so 100.0% 100.0% so •
S-170 ZONING LETTER $0 $1,162 (11,162) 0.0% 100.0% $700 ..
S·2D2 BUS.REGULATORY PMT .ANNUAL RENEWAL $22,1110 127,188 ($4,1558) 83,2% 100.0% $4,800
S-203 NEW/MOVED/CHANGED BUSINESS PROC'G 13,500 $31,734 ($28,234} 11.0'11. 100.0% $28,200
S-204 NEW HOME BUSINESS PROCESSING $0 $13,139 (113,139) 0.0% 100.0'Mo $11,800 ..
5-208 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROCESSING so 18,670 ($8,570) 0.0% 100.0"" so (1)
S..207 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL INSPECTION 10 $72,800 ($72,800) 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-208 GARAGE SALE REGULATION 10 $3,594 (13,584) 0.0% 100.0% $3,000 ..
S-209 VEHICLE IMPOUND/RElEASE CHARGE $95 15140 ($45) 87.9% 100.0% $0
5-210 ANIMAL CONTROL 162,000 1338,172 (127<4,172) 18.4% 2.5.0% $22,043
5-212 REPLACEMENT DOG UCENSE so $98 ($116) 0.0% 100.0% $100
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
FISCAL YEAR 2010-11
1'0111111\.E
10TAl. 'tOTAL ,AICIFJT, PCT.REt:OVERY NEW
REFI I&JMCI! '111\.1!. uva~ue COlT j SUBSIDY) CURRENT S UGGESTED REVENUE
S-214 DEAD PET PICK-UP $0 $2,336 ($2,338) 0.11'% 1DO.OOX. $1,700 ••
S-216 HOME QUARANTINE INSPECTION $0 $1,335 ($1,335) 0.0% 100.0% $1 ,300
s-2.22 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT -ANNUAL $85,!52 $70,855 ($5,003) 82.9% 100.0% $5,000
S-223 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT -MONTH!. Y $2,400 $5,512 ($3.192) 42.9% 100.0% $3,200
S-224 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT-DAILY $54,840 $74,034 ($19,194) 74 .1% 100.0% $111,200
S-225 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT APPEAL so $12,323 ($12 ,323) 0.0% 100.0% $12.300
S-226 ANNUAL PARKING PMT·TSFR & REPLCMNT $;3,00 $619 [1319) 48 .5% 100.0% $300
S-230 ctTATIONS FOR IllEGAL PARKING $523.125 $303,800 1219,325 172.2% 100.0% $0 (2)
S-235 INSPECTION FOR COOE COMPL\ANCE S40 $48,129 ($48,088) 0.1% 100.0% $4,500 (3)
S-237 SUBSTO.RECOROAT10N PLCMNT & REMOVAL SD $82,3111 ($82,3111) 0.0% 100.0% $62,300
S-239 VACNIT PROPERTY MONITORING $0 $11,542 ($8 ,542) 0.0% 100.0% $8,500
5-240 PARKING DISTRICT OPERATIONS so 1178,851 ($178,851) 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
5-301 PICNIC SHElTER RESERVATION $0 17,123 ($7.123) 0.0% 100.0% $7 ,100
S-331 RECREATION: TEENS $28,250 $171.990 ($145 ,740) 15.3% 100.0% so (1)
S-334 RECREATION: PLAYGROUND $170,250 $1171,885 ($401,715) 29 .8% 100.0% $0 (1)
5-337 RECREATION: CLASSES $183,226 $215,280 (162,055) 75.11% 100.0% $0 (1}
S-342 RECREATION: SEt-tORS $35,845 $187,803 ($132,158) 21.2% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-3-48 RECREATION: YOUTH SPORTS $88,325 $311,904 ($225,578) 27.7% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-349 RECREATION: DAY CAMP $7,000 $&4,520 ($57 ,520) 10.8% 100.0% so (1)
S-351 SPECIAL EVENTS: CAMELLIA FESTIVAL $0 $41 ,821 ($41,821) 0.0% 100 .. 0% so (1)
S-356 SPECIAL EVENTS: UGHTS ON $0 M4,fi84 (~.684) D.O% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-3511 SPECIAL EVENTS: SUMMER CONCERTS $0 $32,554 ($32,.564} 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-360 SPECIAL EVENTS: OTHER $8,150 $89,8111 ($61,4811) 11 .7% 100.0% so (1)
S-370 COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM RENTAL $10,000 $81,840 ($71,840) 12..2% 100.0% so (1)
S-•410 GENERAL FUND SVCS TO THE L1.D $11,800 $1&4,289 ($172.~9) 8.4% 100.0% 10 (1)
5-411 LLD-LIGHTING OPERA nONS $738,000 $418,255 1249,745 151.4~ 100 .0% $0 (1}
S-413 LLD-LANDSCAPING SERVICES $315,000 $557,837 ($242,637) 56.5% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-422 STREET SWEEPING so 1131,921 ($139,921) 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-451 SPECIAL CURB PAINTING $0 $12,342 ($12,342) 0.0% 100.0% $7,400 ..
S-703 AGENDA SUBSCRIPTION $0 so $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 &
S-705 FILMING PERMIT $435 $978 ($541) 44 .6% 100.0% $500
5-710 FIREWORKS STAND REVIEW $688 $1 ,128 (1540) 52.1% 100.0% $500
S-712 BINGO REGULATION $100 $81 $19 123..5% 100.0% so
S-714 STREET BANNER so $815 (1815) 0 .0% 100.0% $380 ..
S-716 PHOTOCOPYIREPROOUCfiON CHARGE $0 $0 $0 100.11% 100.0% $0
S-725 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE $500 $1,0111 l!51!) 49 .1 % 100 .0% $500
TOTALS S2 ,947.2i5 S5.314.H8 ,,213871603~ 55.5% 62.5% $374 .133
Key to Symbols:
• • Clly chargee actual cosl
•• • Demand will decline as user Ia required Ia PlY full coat.
f -hmllllclent demand to ]Qdlcl addiUona l re.,.nue ~~~hough some mlgtlt occ:w In the Ill cal yea-.
& -Staff rac:ornmanda deleting lhls saMce •• ll Ia no Ianger pnMdecl.
(1). Stiff will be further ravlewlnglheae IBMCllll for. aublequenl Ph-n or lhe fee adDp\lon process.
(2) • Presented here lD show lhatlhe coal of llauklg lhe cii11Uon1 Is !Bas lhln 0. revenue I'1Klllhled.
(3) -Low I1IGDWry 111 &tat IWo lnspec:tlcns life wilhoul chalge 10 encoun~ge compliance.
ATTACHMENT "C"
COST OF SERVICES STUDY
for the
City of Temple City, CA
Fiscal Year 2010-2011
Publication Date: Apri/28, 2011
Copyright, 2011 by Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
All rights resetVed. No parl of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or copied In any
form or by any means-graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or
Information storage and retrieval systems-without written permission of:
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C
FuHerlon, California 92831
(714} 992-9020
REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS, L.L.C.
2545 Chapman Avenue, Suite 103
Fullerton, California 92831
April 28, 2011
Jose Pulido, City Manager
City of Temple City
9701 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, CA 91781
Dear Mr. Pulido,
(714) 992 .. 9020
This letter transmits the Cost of Services Study that RCS has prepared for the City. This
report reviews the City's service costs and offers suggestions for fee changes, either to
comply with State Law or to recover the City's costs .
RCS has appreciated the assistance of City staff In providing the Information for this report.
Sincerely,
{9Jlh
RICKKERMER
President
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A . The cumulative effect of the three taxpayer Initiatives, Propositions 13, 4 & 218, has
been to significantly change California local government finance. In each case, the
intention of the Initiative's authors was to limit local government revenue to the point
where government services were forced to become more efficient and effective
while restricting the use of tax dollars to services generally considered to be tax
services.
B. Even though the City is currently using about $2.4 Million in taxes to support Fee or
Potential-Fee Services, many of these services are subsidized for quality of life,
public safety or other reasons. Based on our experience in other cities, only about
28% of this tax subsidy or about $670,000 could be recovered by requiring a
number of services to either •pay their own way" or, at least, •pay more of their own
way:
C. Being supported by fees merely means that the cost of the service is "In-line· with
the fee charged for the service. Raising the fee is only one way to bring the two Into
line. The cost may be reduced by re-englneerlng the service. The service may be
discontinued. A non--user may wish to support the service for the recognition. The
real issue to be addressed is whether there is a reason for the City to have the
general taxpayer subsidize a particular service for a •personal choice• user.
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
CHAPTER I
BACKGROUND
To fully understand this Report and why it is even necessary, It is important for the reader
to understand why local government financial management has changed over the last thirty
years.
Proposition 13
This Report would not exist today without the voter adoption of Proposition 13. This
proposition, which becameArticleXIIIA of the State Constitution, established a limit on the
growth of the property tax.
Proposition 4
After the passage of Proposition 13, the California Taxpayers Association, the California
Chamber of Commerce, the National Tax Limitation Committee and the California
Association of Realtors banded together, contributed money, hired constitutional attorneys
to draft a more thorough proposition, and hired Paul Gann, who was an associate of
Howard Jarvis, to be the proposition's spokesperson. The result was Proposition 4, which
is more commonly referred to as the "Gann Spirit of 13 'Lefs Finish the Job' Initiative•. It
was adopted by 74.3% of the voters of California on November 6, 1979, and became
effective on July 1, 1980, retroactive to Fiscal Year 1978-79.
This proposition, whldl became Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, had a more
significant fiscal impact than Prop. 13 as It addressed all city revenues and established a
limit on the growth of tax revenues.
Because of Proposition 4, fees for services cannot exceed the •costs reasonably borne"
by cities in providing the services. If a fee exceeds the cost, that excess fee is defined to
be a special tax which Proposition 13 requires be approved by two-thirds of the voters. This
eliminated the possibility that cities would use unsupportably high fees to get around Prop.
13.
Proposition 218
This proposition, which is now Articles XIIIC & D, was adopted in November of 1996. It
limits the use of assessment districts and restricts transfers of monies into the general fund
City of T em pte C ity Cost of SeNices Study
from utility funds which were loopholes being used to get around the restrictions of
Propositions 13 & 4.
Report Goal
The goal of this Report Is to provide updated information to the City on what its Fee
Services are costing. If it turns out that some are making a profit, the City needs to comply
with the requirements of Articles XIII A & B of the State Constitution.
If some are being subsidized with tax dollars, the authors of Proposition 4 wanted the City
to be aware of it in case the subsidy was unintentional.
Study Phases
To accomplish our goal, the work encompassed by this Report involved two basic phases,
which are discussed in the following Chapters:
1. Identify and fully cost the staff hours In the departments providing services to the
public. This phase will show how staff positions can be thought of as time resources
for the City. How each unit of time can be fully costed and asslgned to a particular
service which is provided to the public. The result of this phase Is the Fully-
Burdened Hourty Rate (FBHR) for staff posltJons providing Public Services.
2. Fully cost the Fee Services where the City Is already charging, or could charge, for
the service and present the results so that the City Is aware of the source of monies
used to support each service and can determine compliance with the State
Constitution.
CHAPTER II
FULLY-BURDENED HOURLY RATES
Most labor for hire in the private sector is based on a flat hourly rate. For example, a
plumber who is fixing a toilet for a homeowner may quote an hourty rate of $70. As
consumers, we understand that the plumber Is not making $70 an hour but that all of the
costs associated with his/her trip to the homeowner are factored into that rate. This chapter
shows how RCS has calculated a similar hourly rate for staff that provide services.
Costs Recognized by Proposition 4
In Chapter I, it was mentioned that the authors of Proposition 4 included the California
Association of Realtors and the California Chamber of Commerce; In effect, the pillars of
bus;ness. Therefore, it is not surprising that they recommended a business-oriented
approach to the costs of governmental services. For example:
•rhe phrase •costs reasonably bome by such entity In providing the
regulation, product, or service' is Intended to incorporate all appropriations
by an entity for reasonable costs appropriate for the continuation of the
service over time. This includes ongoing expenses such as operation costs
and a reasonable allocation for overtlead and administration, but It also
includes reasonable allocation for start-up costs and future capacity. Thus,
reasonable allocations for capital replacement, expansion of services, and
repayment of related bond Issuances would be considered 'costs reasonably
bome'.•1
Cost Elements In the Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
The fully-burdened hourly rate (FBHR) for a position Includes the following:
-Salary
Benefits
and a proportionate share of the accounting activity's •generar costs for the following:
1 '"Summary of Proposed bnplemen~ng Lsglslation and Drafter's Intent with Regard to Article XlllB of the CsBfomla
Constitution (Proposrt io n 4, November 6, 1979r: Spirit of 13, Inc.; 1980: CeMtomia Chamber of Commerce; page 6.
City of Temple City Cost of Services Study
Operating Expenses
-Overhead & Indirect Services
When these costs are added together for a position, the result is the total cost of that
position to the City. The fully-burdened hour1y rate for that position is then calculated by
taking the total cost of the position and dividing it by the number of hours that the position
is available for work (i.e. •the available work-hoursj.
Salary
This includes the annual salary of the position. If there are multiple people with the same
position title, then this Includes their total salary so that the cost of Individuals at different
pay steps is averaged over all people with the same tiUe. The salary cost should also
Include any benefit that is unique to that position such as a car allowance unless that
benefit is included with the other benefits.
Benefits
There are three categories of employee benefits: hour, dollar and percentage. The hour
benefits are d lscussed under the topic of davaila ble work-hours." Dollar benefits refer to any
benefit where the cost Is a flat amount Irrespective of the employee's salary. Examples of
dollar benefits are:
Health, Dental & Optical Insurance
Life Insurance
Percentage benefits refer to benefits where the cost Is determined by multiplying the
employee's salary by a percentage rate. Examples of percentage benefits are:
Retirement Contribution
Medicare
Workers' Compensation Insurance
Retiree Health Benefits
Chapter 1/-F ully-Burdened Hourry Rates
"General,. versus 11Specffic,. Operating Expenses
Specific operating expenses are ·driven• by a specific service . Consequently, specific
expenses should be allocated directly to that service rather than included as an element
of the FBHR. To include specific expenses ln the hour1y rate would result ln those
expenses being spread to all work performed by those staff positions so that the cost of
the specific service would be understated and all other services by those positions would
be overstated .
Examples of specific expenses are:
1. Contracted plan check service for a particular penn It application.
2. Advertising the public hearing of a planning application.
3. Special maintenance expenditures for a particular building or facility.
Once the specific expenses have been allocated directly to the appropriate service, the
expenses which remain are •general• operating expenses and necessary for the
associated positions to function properly.
Overhead & Indirect Services
The services provided by the City can be divided into PUBLIC SERVICES and INTERNAL
SERVICES. PUBLIC SERVICES , like the name implies, are services that the public directly
receives whether it's police patrol or conditional use permits. INTERNAL SERVICES are
the services provided by City departments that support other departments without serving
the public d irectly. This group of costs, overttead & Indirect services, are the INTERNAL
SERVICES for the City.
The overhead costs were calculated using the Cost Allocation Plan (CAP). Costs in this
category are for general City Administration :
City Council
City Manager
City Clerk (Council Support)
City Attorney
Financial Services
Each service is very important to the smooth functioning of the City. But, as mentioned
before, their primary function is to support other departments and not to provide an end-
user service to the public. Where they do perform an end-user service, the cost related to
that service has been removed from the costs allocated to other departments.
City of Temple City Cost of Services Study
The indirect costs were also calculated using the CAP and included the following:
Liability Insurance
Facilities Maintenance & Replacement
CAP Methodology
RCS took the following steps to allocate the above numerated overhead & indirect service
costs to all other services through the Cost Allocation Plan:
1. Created cost "pools" called •subpools" for each of the above overhead & indirect
services.
2 . Calculated the Costs for each subpool
3 . Identified departments receiving support from each overhead & indirect service
sub pool
4 . Selected a method for allocating the costs (#2) to other departments (#3)
5. Reviewed the Allocations for Reasonableness with City staff
CAP Results
The results from the CAP process are found on the following schedule where the total on
the second page represents the total general City overhead and indirect service costs
allocated to the respective departments and their activities.
This schedule Is also found as TAB 1 in the Full Cost AUocation Plan which has been
provided to the City as a separate Report.
Suborg #
01-910-42
01-910-45
01-920-48
01-930-48
01-930-53
01-930-54
01-930-55
01-940-58
01-940-57
01-940-59.1
01-950-61 .1
01-950-61.2
01-950-62
01 -9~3
01-950-64
01-950-85
01-950-66
01-950-67
01-960-77
01-970-82
01-970-84
1>920-48
15-930-53
15-940-58
21-960-71
21-960-72
21-960-74
CfTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
Final Allocation Summary Report-Total
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Suborg Name
CITY MANAGER
COUNCIL SUPPORT
ACCOUNTING
FIN-HOUSING
CD-PLANNING
CO-BUILDING
CO-HOUSING
P&R-COMM.RELATIONS
P&R-RECR./H.SVCS
P&R-PARKS-MTCIFAC.
LAW ENFORCEMENT
SHERIFF OPERATIONS
CD-TRAFFIC ENG'G
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL
CD-EMERG.SVCS .
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT
CD-RES.SAF.VOLPATROL
CD-PARKING ADMIN.
CD-SOLID WASTE MGMT
CD-PARKING FAC.
CD-GRAFFITI ABATE .
FIN-ACCTG-PUB .TRANS
CD-PLNG-PUB TRANS
P&R-PUBUC TRANS.
CD-ADMIN.& ENG.
CD-STREET CLEANING
CD-SIGNS & STRIPING
1
SCHEDULE A
Final Allocation
$41,246.35
$7,244.44
$397.43
$3,984.15
$244,466.31
$126,583.32
$161,053.38
$36,741.18
$629,402.43
$324,048.44
$82,731.01
$278,267.46
$8,204.22
$91 ,085.79
$41,614.10
$155,235.60
$8,3n.15
$89,141.53
$4,059.81
$61,875.76
$4,154.96
$1 ,411.74
$1,938.83
$93,423.35
$43,347.49
$9,734.45
$45,060.78
April28 ,2011
Suborg t#
21-960-75
21-960~76
47-960-73
47-960-78
47-970-83
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
Final Allocation Summary Report· Total
FISCAL YEAR 2010 .. 2011
Suborg Name
CD-STREET MAINT.
CD-SIDEWALK MTC.
CD-TRAF.SIG.MTC.
CD-STREET LIGHTING
P&R-TREES & PKWYS
2
SCHEDULE A
Final Allocation
$54,425.22
$9,519.18
$9,628.37
$33,258.31
$142,694.35
$2,842,356.89
April 28, 201 t
Chapter II • Fully-Burdened Hourly Rates
Available Work-Hours
After computing the individual elements of the cost for positions in a department/activity
providing PUBLIC SERVICES, the total cost for each position is divided by the total
number of available work-hours for that position.
In order to compute the number of available work-hours, RCS started with the total
possible work-hours in a year which is 2,080 hours . From this possible total, RCS subtracts
hours for the following benefits:
Holidays
Vacations
Sick leave
Training
Morning/Afternoon Breaks
Start Up/Down Time
The hours that remain are referred to as the available work-hours. No consideration is
given to the possibility of uslack" or ~idle• time because those hours can be controlled by
the department/activity manager. The average number of available work-hours used for
general City employees was 1 ,626. 2
Results of Knowing the Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate (FBHR)
The following are possible benefits of knowing the FBHR of employees:
Knowing the hour1y cost of an employee will cause a good manager to think of
dollars when monitoring the activity (or inactivity} of an employee.
Trust deposits can be used which more accurately reflect the cost of staff services.
Knowing the cost of participants should make those who call meetings aware of
their cost. How often do thousand dollar meetings resolve hundred dollar Issues?
Those who routinely arrive late to meetings, keeping others from starting the
meeting on time, can know the cost to the organization of their tardiness.
~ The "available wor1t-hours~ are used in &eu of lhe private seotor "billable hours" as a more conservative estimate of the
My-burdened hourty rate.
City of Temple City Cost of Services Study
Those who talk to customers on the phone or at the counter can measure the cost
of the conversation that went beyond the necessary communication of information.
These examples are only a small number of possible results and are general in nature, not
specific to the City of Temple City.
Summary
In this Chapter, the process of calculating the fully-burdened hourly rate (FBHR) was
presented.
In the next Chapter, RCS will more fully define the City's Fee Services as PUBLIC
SERVICES and calculate their cost by using the FBHR developed here.
CHAPTER Ill
PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES
For this Report the City's PUBLIC SERVICES are separated into two groups :
Terminology
COMMUNITY-SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES
PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES
What is a tax service? There is the simple definition -·A tax service is anything that the
City does that I paid my taxes for:
More complicated, academic definitions refer to the social contract and how these services
cannot be measured and that we all use them, etc.
The pragmatic definition of a tax service Is: •Anything that the Council decides to support
by taxes as long as tax revenues are available: Once this fact Is realized, there are no
"true• tax services, only services that individual city councils have decided to support with
taxes. In other words, '"what is a tax service• is •backed into• once the amount of tax
revenues are determined .
Given these problems with defining what is a atax service•, lt makes more sense to discuss
these services in the context of being COMMUNITY-SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES
which are 100% supported by taxes. The reference to 100% is to exclude from
COMMUNITY-SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES any PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC
SERVICES that are partially tax subsidized. This Is because, as we will see below, the
issues change when a service Is only partially tax supported.
Personal Choice Public Services
PERSONAL CHOICE PUBLIC SERVICES are defined as services where the customer is
Identifiable and the service is measurable and can be withheld for non-payment. These
services are not referred to as fee services because the Council may have made a
decision to totally subsidize the service.
What distinguishes these services from COMMUNITY -SUPPORTED PUBLIC SERVICES
is the implicit requirement that there be a rationale for subsidizjng some of these services
City of Te mple City Cost of Services Study
but not others. Or, for subsidizing some customer groups but not other customer groups.
Typically the rationale is that there is a quality of life, social, or safety reason to subsidize .
Proposition 4 was the voter initiative that was most concerned about fee services. The
initiative authors were not concerned what services were subsidized as long as the subsidy
was an explicit decision of the City Council based on knowing the full cost of the service.
Personal Choice Public Service Detail is Found in Appendix A
Appendix A, which is in sequence by the Reference Number (Column 1 on the following
Schedule), includes detail information for each service on two facing pages. The left page
has textual and summary information including RCS's suggested service fee . The right
page has the service cost detail.
General Commentary on the following Schedule
Each has nine columns, explained here:
Column 1 is the Report Reference Number.
Column 2 is the title of the service.
Column 3. 4 & 5 are the same amounts for revenue, cost and profit (subsidy) found on the
left page of the detail service sheets In Appendix A.
Column 6 is the current percentage of costs recovered from the user fees and charges with
the difference being subsidized by taxes.
Column 7 is the percentage of user fee cost recovery which might be obtainable without
tax subsidy. Of course, decisions regarding tax subsidies to a service Is a City Council
policy decision on how to allocate Its tax and general revenues.
Column 8 contains the estimated amountofrevenueswhich RCS suggests could be raised
or reduced.
Column 9 is used for flagging an issue that is described in the •Key to Symbols• at the end
of the Schedule.
Chapter Ill -Personal Choice Public Services
Suggestions For Services Analyzed
It is suggested that the City review each of the services in this Report for the following
reasons:
1. To confirm or negate the decision that the service is a PERSONAL CHOICE
PUBLIC SERVICE.
2. To insure that any service which has been and which will continue to be
subsidized meets the purpose (e.g . Social Goal} and reporting criteria
established by the Council.
3. Where services have been unconsciously subsidized, to direct staff to bring
costs into line with the revenue generated by such service.
Summary Schedule
The Schedule on the following pages summarizes the detail for each service found in
Appendix A.
CITY OF TEMPLE CnY, CAUFORNJA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
FISCAL YEAR2010-11
PONIBLI!
tOTAL lOTAL PfiOFI'Q PCT.RECOVfRY NPf
RII!F1f SII!IMC£ "111\..E IIEWHUE CCIT [SUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVC NUE
5-(110 BUILDING PlANCK & INSPECTION S!584,000 $518,811 $85,389 112.6% 1000% $0 (1)
S.02S GeNERAL PLAN MAIIIITENANCE so S100,000 ($100,000) 0.0% 100.0% so (1)
S-030 MUNI.CODE COMPLIANCE PLN CK & INSP . $0 $18,982 (118,882) 0.0% 100.0% $111,000
5-otll TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ~3 111,082 ($8 ,019) 0.5% 100.0% 14.000 ••
5-100 CO"'DITIONAL USE PERMIT: R·1 ZONE $7,299 112,597 (15.2118) S7.9'A 100.0% S3,500 ..
5-101 CO"'DITIONAL USE PERMIT: All Ol'HER 17,2911 $15,200 ($7,101) .48.0% 100.0% $5,300 ..
5-102 CUP MODIFICATION: R·1 ZONE $.405 $1188 ($.4111) ~5.2% 100.0% so '
5-103 CUP MOOIFICATION: ALl OTHER $2,025 15,828 ($3,901) 3.4.2% 100.0% S2,300 ••
S-104 CUP CONDITION MONITORING so $9,093 (11.093) 0.0% 100.0% $9,100
S-105 ZONE VARIANCE: R-1 ZONE $1 ,300 56,768 ($5,458) 19.2% 100.0% 14,100 ••
S-107 ZONE VARIANCE : All OTHER ZONES $1,958 $8,756 (~,800) 28.0% 100.0% $3,600 ..
S-109 ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: R-1 ZONE 1244 11,185 ($~1) 20.8% 100.0% so •
S-112 ZONE VAR.MODIFICAno"': OTHER ZONES $.405 $1,185 ($780) 34.2% 100.0% so •
S-11~ ZONEVAR.MODIFICATIDN: MINOR S182 $2611 ($1011) 80.<4% 100.0% so •
5-118 APPEALS 1182 1133 (1771) 11.4% 100.0% so •
S-118 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT $975 15,428 ($4,451) 18.0% 100.0% so •
5-120 ZONE CHANGE $811 $5,-426 ($4,1115) 14 .9% 100.0% so •
5-121 GEN.PLAN AMEND. & ZONE ~NGE $1,825 $8,885 (15,0110) 24.3% 100.0% so '
S-123 RES'L PLND DEV: PROVISIONAL PLAN $1,822 S7.533 1$5,811) 21 .5% 100.0% 15,1100
5-125 RES'L PLNO DEV: PRECISE PLAN 11.426 $7,533 1$8,107) 183 100.0% $8,100
5-126 TEMPORARY SIGNISANNER REVIEW so $44,700 ($44,700) 0.0% 100.0% 133,500 ..
5-127 SIGN REVIEW $1,190 $5,886 rss.ne) 33,4% 100.0% 13,1100
5-128 SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW $0 $485 ($4115) 0.0% 100.0% so •
5·128 SITE PLAN REVIEW-MINOR $2,1150 S1,S74 $.478 130.2% 100.0% ($500)
S·130 SITE PlAN REVEW·MA.IOR $12,300 156,860 (144,360) 217% 100.0% $44,400
5-135 SITE PLAN REVIEW-APPEAL $0 S3,500 ($3,500) 0.0% 100.0% $2,100 ••
S-1<41 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15,178 114,411 (S9,242) 3511% 100.0% 19,200
S-143 TENT'ATIVE TRACT MAP $3,554 $8,792 (15.231) 40.4'11. 100.0'111 15.200
5·1~4 TENYATIVE ~ MODIFICATION $244 S1,233 ($111111) 19.1% 100.0% so '
S-145 FINAL MAP $968 $2,595 (S1 ,6211) 37.2% 100.0% $1,1100
S-147 TIME EXTEt-lSION $732 11,297 ($585) 58.4% 100.0% S800
S-150 SUBOMSia... MAP AMENDMENT so S972 (1972) 0.0% 100.0% so •
S-152 LOT COMB INATION 1244 1847 (1603) 28,11% 100.0% so •
5-154 lOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -MINOR $325 S847 ($522) 38.4% 100,0% so '
S-158 CATEGORICAl EXEMPTION FROM CEQA $875 $1 ,133 (~58) 58.8% 100.0% 1500
5-157 NEGATIVE (ENVIRON.) DECLARATION S1,350 $3,400 ($2.050) 39.7% 100.0% S2.100
5-158 EIRIMITIQATED NEGATIVE DEC. REVIEW so so so 100.0% 100.0% so •
5·180 PUBliC CONVENENCE & NECESSITY so 11,500 ($1,500) 0.0% 100,0% 11,500
S-164 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION so $3,500 ($3,500) 0.0% 100.0% $2,100 ..
S-168 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT so so $0 100.0% 100.0% so •
S-170 ZONING LETTER so $1,182 (11,182) 0.0% 100.0% 1700 ..
5-202 BUS.REG'-\ATORY PMT »NJAl RENEWAL $22,810 $27,188 ($4,551) 13.2% 100.0% $4,800
S-203 NEWJMOVEDICHANGED BUSNESS PROC'O $3,500 $31,734 (S21,23.4) 11.0% 100.0% $28,200
5-204 HEW HOME BUSINESS PROCESSING so $13,139 (113,131) 0.0% 100.0% 111,1100 ..
S-208 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROCESSING 10 $8,570 ($8,570) 0.0% 100.0% so (1)
S -207 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL INSPECTION so $72,800 (S72.,500) O,O'l(o 100.0% so (1)
S-208 GARAGE SALE REGULATION so $3,594 ($3 .594) O.O'lfo 100.0% $3,000 ..
5-2011 VEHICLE I~DtRELEASE CHARGE $85 $140 ($.45) 67.9% 100.0% so
5-210 ANIMAL CONTROL $82,000 $338,172 ($274,172) 18.4% 25.0% S22,043
5-212 REPLACEMENT DOG UCENSE so ltfJ ($911) 0.0% 100.0% 1100
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF SERVICE REVENUES, COSTS & PROFIT/SUBSIDY
FISCAl YEAR 2010-11
rou~•LE
'IOTA&.. lOT AI. PRORTJ PCT.IIECOVf.ltY NEW
AEFI SEIMCE111U' ~ C08T jSUBSIDY) CURRENT SUGGESTED REVENUE
S-214 DEAD PET PICK·UP $0 $2.336 ($2.338) 0.0% 100 .0% $1,700 ••
5·216 HOME QUARANTINE INSPECTION so $1,335 ($1.335) 0.0% 100.0% $1,300
S·222 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMrT·ANHUAL $65,852 $70,855 ($5,003) 92.9% 100.0% $5,000
S-223 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMrT·MONTHL Y $2,<400 $5,5112 ($3,112) 42.K 100.0% $3,200
S-224 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT·DAIL Y S5U4D $74,034 ($1!1,1114) 74 .1% 100.0% $19.200
S-225 OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT APPEAL so $12,323 ($12,323) 0.0% 100.0% $12,300
S-226 ANNUAL PARKING PMT·TSFR & REPLCWff $300 $818 ($318) 48.15% 100.0% $300
S-230 ~TAT~FORI~EGALPARK~ $523,125 $303,800 $218,325 172.2% 100.0% so (2)
S-235 INSPECTION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE $40 $46,1211 ($48,0111) 0.1% 100,0% $4,500 (3)
S-237 SUBSTD.RECOROA'TION PLCMNT & REMOVAL so $82,319 ($&2,3111) 0.0% 100.0% $62,300
S-239 VACANT PROPERTY MONITORING so SII.S-42 ($8,542) 0.0% 100.0% $8,500
5 ·240 PARKING DISTRICT OPERATIONS so $176,851 ($118,851) 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-301 PICNIC SHelTER RESERVATION $0 $7,123 ($7,123) 0.0% 100.0% S7,100
S-331 RECREATION : TEENS $28,250 $171,880 ($145,7.(0) 15.3% 100.0% so (1)
S-334 RECREATION : PLAYGROUND $170,260 $571,985 ($401,715) 28.8% 100 .0% so (1)
S-337 RECREATION : CLASSES $183,225 $215,280 ($52,055) 75.8% 100.0% so (1)
S-342 RECREATION: SENIORS $35,645 $187,803 ($132,158) 21.2% 100.0% $0 (1)
S·346 RECREATION: YOUTH SPORTS $88,325 $31 1,90ot ($225,5711) 27.7% 100.0% so (1)
S-349 RECREATION: DAY CAMP $7,000 $64,520 ($57,520) 10.8% 100.0% so (t)
S·351 SPECIAL EVENTS: CAMELLIA FESTIVAL so $41,821 (S41,821) 0.0% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-355 SPECIAL EVENTS: LIGHTS ON so $44,684 ($44,5&4) 0.0% 100.0'11. so (1)
S-358 SPECIAL EVENTS: SUMMER CONCERTS so $32,554 ($32,554) o.cn. 100.0% so (1)
S-360 SPECIAL EVENT'S: OTHER $8,150 $89,618 ($81,469) 11.7% 100.0% so (1)
5-370 COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM RENTAL 110,000 $81,640 ($71,&40) 12.~ 100.0% so (1)
S-410 GENERAL FUND SVCS TO THE llD $11,800 $114,289 (1172,4611) 6.4% 100 .0% so (1)
S-411 LLD-LIGHTING OPERATIONS $738,000 $488,255 $249,745 151.4% 100.0% $0 (1)
~13 LLD-LANDSCAPING SERVICES $315,000 $557,837 (S242,837) 58.5% 100.0% $0 (1)
S-422 STREET SWEEPfNG so $139,921 (1139,921) 0.0% 100.0'11. so (1)
S-451 SPECIAL CURB PAitofTIHG $0 $12,342 (112,3-42) 0.0% 100.0% $7,400 ..
S-703 AGENDA SUBSCRIPTION $0 $0 so 0.0% 0.0% so &
S-705 FILMING PERMIT $435 $978 ($541) 44.8% 100.0% $500
S·710 FIREWORKS STANO REVIEW $588 $1,128 ($540) 52.1% 100,0% $500
S-712 BINGO REGULATION S100 $111 $18 123.5% 100,0% $0
5-714 STREET BANNER so 1615 ($815) 0.0% 100.0% $380 ••
5-716 PHOTOCOPY~PRODUCnONCHARGE so so so 100.0% 100.0% so
s-ns RETURNED CHECK CHARGE $500 $1,019 ~519} 49 .1% 100.0% $500
TOTALS $21947~ $$,314.8118 ita1387·e 55.5% 82.5% $374.133
Key ID Symbols:
• • City c:Mrges •duel cost.
-• Demand wll dec:IN q I.IMI' it required to pay ful cost.
1. lnaufrident d~mllnd to predict lcfd!Honal re...,..ue lllhough •orne might occur In 1M lllcal )'81r.
& • Slelf recommends delellng lhla service u It I& M longer ptOIIIded.
(1)· S IBif Will be further r-\'law!ng lhasa saMcel far a lubl8qUenl Ptlue II Dllha rae lldopiiDn procau.
(2) -Preaanted here to ahow lh111he coal of (nu(ng lhe c:Utiona II lnl than lhll revenue ~Mid.
(3)· Law racowry a &rat two lnapedlDns me wllhout d\argl to er1C10UJ11t111 compllauce.
City of Temple City Cost of Services Study
Textual Notes on Spectfic Issues
Recreation & Community Services-Special Comments. Among cities, this area receives
the greatest tax subsidies and Temple City Js no exception . Because of the extent of the
subsidy, this area may also be the hardest hit when tax revenues decline.
The services in this group are a special case because recreation and community services
fall into a category in which two elements generally not present elsewhere come into play.
They are ma£keting and social policy.
Martseting. These services are very sensitive to market forces, being for the most
part financed by discretionary Income. Thus a special burden is on program
management personnel to adopt a pricing policy that is consistent with market
prfces for alternatives. If fees are "too high," attendance, rentals, and consequentJy
revenues, will drop .
Social Policy. The second element Is social policy. The City Council must develop
a conscious policy as to what specific programs and service centers, and in what
amount, should be subsidized with tax monies for social reasons.
Costing Methodology. It Is important to note that the costs shown for each are the
•full costs" which include a portion of department overhead and general City
overhead. Little, if any, of these costs will disappear ff fndMdual programs are cut.
Should there be a desire to cut an Individual program, staff should Identify the
potential savings for the Council . On the other hand, should there be a desire to
raise fees, the Council should ask staff to estimate the impact on attendance and
total revenue. It is possible that raising a fee in this area could result In less revenue
due to a decrease in attendance.
Countv Contract Engineering. Currently the City contracts with Los Angeles County for
engineering services. This arrangement is not integrated well with the planning function
and there Is some concern that development is not paying the full cost of engineering due
to the lag in the County's billing processes. The City should examine this situation and
determine whether a different contracting policy should be adopted .
Existing and Proposed Fees
The following pages list each service with the existing fee and the RCS suggested fee.
REF I: S-010
CURRENT FEE
Vartous 8uldlng Codes
REF#:S-025
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#:5-030
CURRENT FEE
Nona
REF ##: 5.099
cuBR£NJFEE
S43 • Pum~ lot (#1)
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TITLE: BUILDING PLAN CK & INSPECnON
RECOMMENDED FEE
Cly CDIIeciMI men lhen ll cost to provide lhls service . Ills
rammmended that lha OYetBga be used to p111rtlally llnanc:e the
lim year acaual of the Oanenal Plan t.taintenanc. Charge (See
S-{)25)
TITLE: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
RECOMMENDED FEE
19% .wr.harge on al building feellaxupt for SFD addlllons and
lenanl ;m pro>Jemenls. For the c:unent year, \mlsfef lha over.;.
In S-010 Into the reserve fund for thla purpose.
TITLE: MUNJ.CODE COMPUANCE PLN CK & INSP.
RECOMMI!NDED FEE
$98"
TITLE: TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
RECQMMENPED FEE
188r
$ 0 • Chrlstma1 Tree Lot and All Others (111)
REF #:S-100
CURRCNJFEE
$811
REF ##: 5·101
MUR8£NIFE£
$811
TITLE: CONDinONAL USE PERMIT: R·1 ZONE
RECQMMENQED FE!!
$1.~
TITLE: CONDmONAL USE PERMIT: ALL OTHER
R£COMMENDED PEE
$1,740•
1
April28,20,1
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
REF#: S-102 TITLE: CUP MODIFICATION: R·1 ZONE
li~BR!i~I E!iE RECOMMENDED FEE
$405 $923'
REF 1#: $-103 TITLE : CUP MODIFICATlON: ALL OTHER
'URBE~T Eli~ RECOMMENDED FEE
$405 $1.221*
REF#: $-104 TI'Tl.E: CUP CONDITION MONITORING
~L!BBIJiNT FEE RF!CO!!!MENDED FEE
None $520"
REFt:s-105 TJTL£: ZONE VARIANCE: R·1 ZONE
CU881ii!II FEE RECQMMENDED FEE
$325 $1,740.
REF t#: S.107 TJTL£: ZONE VARIANCE: ALL OTHER ZONES
!iLIBBIHfi Eg~ ftECOMMENDED FEE
$489 $1.740.
REF#: $-109 TITLE: ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: R-1 ZONE
ICI.!BB~~I EEE B£COMMENDEQ FEE
$244 $1,221*
2
Apnl 28. 2011
REF t11: S-112
CURRENT FEE
$405
REF#: S-114
CURRENT FEE
$162
REF#: S-116
CURRENT FEE
$162
REF 1: S-118
CURRENT FEE
$975
REF#: S-120
CURRENT FEE
$811
REF#: S-121
CURRENT FEE
$1,625
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TITLE: ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: OTHER ZONES
RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,221.
TITLE: ZONE VAR.MOOIFICATION: MINOR
TITLE: APPEALS
BE COM MENQED FEE
$278°
BECOMMENDEp FEE
$961·
TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDED FEE
ss,sas•
TITLE: ZONE CHANGE
AECOMMEt!lED FEE
SS.SB9*
TITLE: GEN.PLAN AMEND. & ZONE CHANGE
RECOMMENDED FEE
suas·
3
Apri1 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
REF#: S-123 llTLE: RES'L PLND DEV: PROVISIONAL PLAN
CURRE~I fJ;E RECOMMENDER fEE
$811 $3,880.
REF##:S-125 TITLE: RES'L PLND DEY: PRECISE PLAN
Si!.!RRENT FEE RECOMMENDED fEE
$713 S3.aao•
REF#:S-126 TITLE: TEMPORARY SIGN/BANNER REVIEW
liLIBB~lii fEE ftECOMMENDED FEE
None $115°
REF#: S-127 TITLE: SIGN REVIEW
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$42 S13CY
REF#: S-128 TITLE: SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW
'LIBBE!tT Eli!i RECOMMENDED fEE
None $510"
REFt:S-129 TITLE: SrTE PLAN REVIEW-MINOR
'LIBB&NIEEi RECOMMENDED Eg
$82 S85•
4
Aprtl28, 2011
REF#: S-130
!;;URREl!II Eili
$82
REF##:S-135
~!.!BBiitti EH
None
REF#: S-141
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TITLE: SITE PLAN REVIEW-MAJOR
81,QMMENDED E~E
$38lr
TITLE: SITE PLAN REVIEW-APPEAL
8CCr21fd!;l!II!~D EJili
snt·
TITLE: TENTA~PARCELMAP
CURRENT FIE RECQMMENDED FEE
SB11 plus $181 per lot/unit cha111ed ag•lnalan lnllial deposit of $3,713*
~5.596
REF#: S-143 TITLE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
CU88ENJ FI!E BI!COMMEJ«JED FEE
$1111 plus $181 per loi/IM!it charged agalnslan fnllial deposU of $4,528•
$5,820
REF ##: S-144
CUABENTFEE
$244
REF t: S-145
CUftR£NTFEE
$161 plus Counly Fees
TITLE: TENTATIVE MAP MODIFICATION
TITLE: FINAL MAP
BECOMMENQED fEE
11.270.
RECOMMENDI;Q FEE
$445" plus County Fees
5
April 28, 2011
REFI#:S-147
CURRENT FEE
$2.44
REF#:S-150
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#:S-152
CUBBENTEEE
S24-4
REFI#:S-154
CURRENT fi!E
$325 plul deposit of $849
REF #:S.158
CURRENT FEE
$75
REF 1#: S-157
CUQENTFEE
$150
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TITLE: TIME EXTENSION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$445.
TITLE: SUBDMSION MAP AMENDMENT
RECOf!!MENDED FE£
$1,001.
TITLE: LOT COMBINATION
RECDMMENDEQ FE£
$872"
TITLE: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -MINOR
RECOMMENDED FEE
$872"
TITLE: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM CEQA
RECQMMENDED FEE
$130 plua LA Ccxny aet1l Filing Fee
Tm.E: NEGATIVE (ENVIRON.) DECLARATION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$38!r
6
April 28,2011
REF#: S-158
CURR£NT ,I!E
None
REF#: S-160
CURRENT FEE .._
REF#: S-164
CYRR.ENJ FEE
None
REF#: S-188
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#:S-170
CUARENJFEE
None
REFt:5-202
CURREN! FEE
S70
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
TITLE: EIRIMITIGATED NEGATIVE DEC. REVIEW
RECOMMENDED FE!!
Adual coat of staff, County and City Consubnta agD\aland
Initial deposit delermlnecl by Slaff
TITLE: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE & NECESSITY
BECQMMENDED FEE
srn•
TITLE: PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRET AnON
RECOMMENDED FE£
$721.
TITLE: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
REC(OMMENDED FEE
Actual COIIt of staff, County and City Coii5Uitan18 again&\ and
Initial deposit detennlned tly sl8fr
TITLE: ZONING LETTER
RECOMMENDED FEE
$239"
TITLE: BUS.REGULATORY PMT ANNUAL RENEWAL
RI!COMMENDED EEE
$87.
7
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010~2011
REF#:S-203 TJTLE: NEW/MOVED/CHANGED BUSINESS PROC'G
CURRENT FEE
$25 • Regular Commercial (#55; $1.375)
$115 ·Regulated Commel'cial (#15 $1.425)
$0 • Out ofT own Buainees (#176; $0)
$70 • Regulaled Individual (#10: $700)
RECOMMENQEP fEE
$32cr-Re11ular Commercial ss:w -Regulated Commerdal
$28' -Out of Town BuslnMs
$228" -Regulated Individual
(Note: In addlllon to the above processrng l'ees, a new business
would also pay the flrsl ~ buHleas tax )
(Note: In addition to lhe above ~lory processu'lg fees, a new
business would also pay lhe tnt yur busmess tax .)
REF#:5-204
CURftENTFEE
Nona
nTLE: NEW HOME BUSINESS PROCESSING
BECOMMEtmEp FEE
Sf:W
Note: The $&4 Is a Bualnaas Tax and char;ad annually.
REF #:5-206 TITLE: RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROCESSING
'LIBB!Iii!!T Fli!i RECOMMENDED FEE
None $135*
REF#:s-207 TITLE: RESIDENTIAL RENTAL INSPECTION
~ii.IBB!IiNT FEE 8£COMMENDED fEE
None $75.
REF ##:S-208 TITLE: GARAGE SALE REGULA noN
'LIBB!IitiT ffi!i RECOMMENDED FEE
None srr
REF#:S-209 TITLE: VEHICLE IMPOUND/RELEASE CHARGE
'Lil\BEta fEE R£COMMENDED FEE
SIS s1.w•
8
April28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
REF#:~210 TITLE: ANIMAL CONTROL
CURRENT FEE
Altered • $17 plus addlllonal $9 U delnquenl (11 ,43e;
$24,412)
Unaneled -$34 plus addilional S181f defmluent (#n2;
$24.548)
Senior (65+) • $0; $9 if delinquent (#400; $0)
(Delinquent Income lalhe balance of $13,040)
Impound Redemption. (Shellsr RIIY8f1\le nol City Revenue)
1sl Oll'ense • $35
2nd Olfensa • $50
3rd Offense • $80
RECOMMENDED FEE
Al .. l"'ld-$24• plus addlllonal $1 :V If delinquent
Unallenld • $47" plus .tdillonel $2~ If delinquent
Senior (85+) • $0; $13• II delinquent
lmpoond Redemplon: (Shelter Revenue nol City Revenue)
1st Offenae • $49"
2nd Otrense -$70"
3m Offense • $84•
REFI :~212 TITLE: REPLACEMENT DOG LICENSE
CURBENJFEE
None
REF#:~214
CURRENT FEE
None
REF##: 5-216
CURRENT fl!E
None
RECOMMENDED FEE
sr
TITLE: DEAD PET PICK-UP
RECOMMENDED FEE
$89• plus lhe Shall.-Chlf;4llo lhe City (l'llllngea tom $40 to
$120)
TITLE: HOME QUARANTINE INSPECTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$138.
9
April28,2011
REFt#:S-222
CURRENT fEE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 201 o-2011
TITLE: OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT-ANNUAL
BECOMMENDEQ fEE
1al Quarter Sn.OO ·Regular; $52 .00 • Senlcr(h 594, 8;
$45,738, $312)
Increase lha cutrenl $22 processing dlarge to $28• for an
J*lnlts
2nd Quaf1er. $59 50 • Regular, $44.50 • Senior (Is 223, 2 :
$13,288.50, $88)
3nf Quarter: $47.00 ·Regular, $37.00 • Senlar (Ia 99, 1; $4,653,
$37)
4th Quarter $34.50-Regular; $29 .50 • Senior (Is 50, 1: $1 ,725,
$29.50)
The above fees lndude a $22 proce ss rn g charge wllh !he
balance being an anrorcement coet of $12 50 per quarter ror
Regular and $7.50 per quarter for Seniors. S 77 Is a llkely typo for
$72.
Enforcement COII'Iponenl of Regular pamlits woWt be S13. 11 •
per quar1ar.
Enforcem en t component of Senior pennlta v.ould be $822• per
quarter (40% aubsldy}.
REF#:S.223 mLE: OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT-MONTHLY
CURAENJfEE
$20 • Monlhly with a mllldmurn or two within a calandar year
(Nola: This permll charge only cgven~lhe prDti8Uing casL
TheA! Is no amount for enforcement In lha c:umtnt pennU fee.)
RECOMMENDED FEE
$48"
REF t : 5-224 TITLE: OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT·DAILY
'UBBIHifE~ RECOMMENDED FEE
52 t2.re•
REF #: S-225 TITLE: OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT APPEAL
CURRENTf~lii R!COMMENDEP FEiii
None s2er
REF t#: $-.226 TITLE: ANNUAL PARKING PMT-TSFR & REPLCMNT
91181itiiifEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 $21.
10
April 28. 2011
REF#: 5·230
CURBENTFU
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TITLE: CITATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PARKING
RECOMMENDED FEE
S45. Ayg. Citation Amount (115,500, 75% collection rats)
REF#:S-235
CURRENT FEE
$0 • 1st Inspection
$0 • 2nd II!IIPeCIIDn
S.CO ·Each subsequent lnspeelion
REF#: S·237
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#:S-239
CURRENT F!!E
None
REF#: S-240
CURRENT FEE
HOM
REF#: S-301
CURReNT FE!;
None
TITLE: INSPECTION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
RECOMMENDED FEE
SO • 1sllnspec:Uon
$0 -2nd lnspecllon
547• ·Each subMquent Inspection
TITLE: SUBSTD.RECORDAnON PLCMNT & REMOVAL
RECOMMENDED FEE
$16r-S1andard semce (10 Business Days)
544r • Elcpedlled Service (3 Buslnese Dayal
TITLE: VACANT PROPERTY MONITORING
RI!COMMENDED FEE
$35" • R.glllrallon
S 112" • Inspection
TITLE: PARKING DISTRICT OPERATIONS
RECOMMENQED FEE
TITLE: PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION
RECOMMENQED FEE
$29"
11
April 21, 2011
REF#:S-331
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TlTLE: RECREATION: TEENS
RECOMMENDED FEE
V1rious fees • See Brochure
(Revenuelnc:ludea $550 from fundralsera}
The City needs to balance ree incteiAS wilh the mllltelplace
and how this service 1m pacts lhe quality of l ife In lila community
and helps with juvenUe d iversion.
REFI:S-334 TITLE: RECREATION: PLAYGROUND
CUMENTFEE RECOMMENQEp FEE
Various rea -See BnlchuTe
(ReYenue indudes $3,250 from fundnli~.)
The City needa to balance ree lncfeases wllh the martte~Pece
and how this service l!llpacls llle quality or ore In the mmmunity
and helps v.fth juvenile d•version .
REF t :S-337 nTLE: RECREATION: CLASSES
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Various dais fees-see brochure Registration & Facilities Fee • $15 (nollncluded In the 700.4 class
Instructor receives 70% of the class fee except for Lillie Stars ree shared with lnstructo!S)
which Is run by recreation slaff
Regis tra ti on Fee • SS {nol included In the 70% c:lus fee ehated
Wl!h lniVudDnl)
REFt:S-342 nTLE: RECREATION : SENIORS
CURRENT FEE
Vllllou! fees • See Brochure
Prop. A relmbtnement
REFII:S-348
CUMENTFEE
Vtrious l'ees • See Brochure
RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 -Reglstfetion IT~ Charge
TITLE: RECREATION : YOUTH SPORTS
BECQMMENPED FEE
(Rev~~nue I.-dudes $5,200 from fundral&ets .)
The City needt to balance fee lncrea185 wllh lhe marka1p11C8
and how thfl seiVfce 1mpacts lhe quality of life In the mmmunlly
and helps with juvenUe diversion.
REF t#: S-348
CURRLOO'FEE
S100 ·Winter Cemp
$50 · Spring Camp
nTLE: RECREATION: DAY CAMP
RECOMMENDED FEE
The City needs lo balance f8elnc:reuel wllh the marketplace
and how 1hb service impacts the quality or life In the ccmmunlty
and helps with juY8nJie d iYers1o n.
12
Aprll28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
REF#: S-351 TITLE: SPECIAL EVENTS: CAMELLIA FESTIVAL
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED flEE
None This service Is Included lor lnlormallon only.
REF #: S-355 TITLE: SPECIAL EVENTS: LIGHTS ON
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENQED FEE
None This S«VIc:e Is lnc~ded fOf lnformallon only.
REF #: S-358 TITLE: SPECIAL EVENTS: SUMMER CONCERTS
CURR£NI FEE R£COMMENDED fEE
None This seiVIce Is ~ded for lnformaUon only.
REF#: S-360 TITLE: SPECIAL EVENTS: OTHER
CUBBENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Various admlaion and booth faea. Thia service hllnduded for Information only.
REF t: S-370 TITLE: COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM RENTAL
CUB8£NT FEE RECOMMENDEP FEE
Various -See Department Clly should mcplor. changes In poUcy and ralell.
Noll!: Only about 20% of renlenl pay because of City policy.
REFti:S-410 TITLE: GENERAL FUND SVCS TO THE LLD
CUR8ENTFEE
CurTWI\ char;M ID Cislric:t
$1,800-Trelfic Signal Malnt8flanC8
$4,500-Slteet Lighting
$5,500-Trees and Parkways
RECOMMENQER F!E
Suggesled oharges to Dblrtc:l:
19,538 -Traftic S1gnal Maintenance
$32,780-Slreel L.i ghUng
$141,953-Trees and Parkways
13
April28, 2011
REF#: S-705
CURREN! FEE
$145 • Com martial (13)
$0 • Student (13)
REFt:S-710
CURBENTf!E
$49
REF I#: S-712
CURRENT FEE
$50 annually
REF t: S-714
CURRENTFU
~
REF I#: S-716
CURftENIFE£
50¢ • 1al Page
15¢ • Eac:tl Additional Page
REF#:S-725
CUftB!! NT fE£
$10
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
TJTLE: FILMING PERMIT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$168" -Commercial
$(1 -Student
TITLE: FIREWORKS STAND REVIEW
RECOMMENDED FEE
St7•
TITLE: BINGO REGULATION
RI!COMMENDEQ FEE
$42 •• Annually
TITLE: STREET BANNER
RECOMMENQEQ FEE
$28" • Praceulng Binner ApplicahD!l
$221• • City lnaa.n & Remove Banner
TITLE: PHOTOCOPY/REPRODUCTION CHARGE
ftECOMMENQED FEE
50¢ • 1 al Page
15¢-Each Additional Page
TITLE: RETURNED CHECK CHARGE
RECOMMENDED FEE
se• pluslhe bank charga (eumtnlly $12.)
15
April 28, 2011
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
APPENDIX A
DETAIL REVENUE & COST SHEETS
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BUILDING PlAN CK & INSPECTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-BUILDING
DESCRIPllON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PLAN SET
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-010
To review plans to insure that they conform to City Standards and Specifications. To perform inspections to insure
that approved plans were followed .
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Various Building Codes
no::uw:::uue AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $584,000.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $514,000
UNIT COST: $518,611.00 TOTAL COST: $518,611
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $65,389.00 TOTALPROFIT(SUBmD~: $65,389
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 112.61%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
City collected more than It cost to provide lhls service. It is recommended that the overage be used to partially
finance the first year accrual of the General Plan Maintenance Charge (See 8-025).
Apn128, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
BUILDING PLAN CK & INSPECTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPAftiMENI POSIDON TYPE UNIT TIME
CD-BUILDING COMM.DEV.MGR Plan Chedl 121.95
~UILDING BlDG/HOUSING ASST 1,174.79
OO.BUILDING PART-TIME 62.40
~BUILDING County Plan Cit 0.00
CD-BUILDING Spedellu!d Pln.Ck 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1,359.14
CD-BUILDING COMM.DEV.MGR lnspeeUon 121 .95
CO-BUILDING BLDG/HOUSING ASST 207.32
CD-BUILDING BLDG INSPECTOR 1,285.80
CO-BUILDING PART-TIME 52.40
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1,657.47
TOTALS 3,016.61
REFERENCE NO.
S-010
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$22.502 .21 1 $22,502
$113.989.87 1 1113,990
$2,917.82 1 $2,918
$135,500.00 1 $135,500
$52,800.00 1 $52,800
$327,709.90 $327,710
$22.502.21 1 122.502
$20,118.28 1 $20,116
$145,384.47 1 1145,364
$2,917.82 1 12,91&
$190,900.76 $1H,901
$5111,611 .00 $5111,611
APJ1l 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
REFERENCE NO.
5.025
PRIMARY DI!PARTMENT
VARIOUS
DESCRIPnON Of SERVICE
UNIT OF SEAVlCE
BLDG PERMITS
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To accumulate monies over a ten year period to pay the cost of updating the City's seven elements to the General
Plan. This cost is estimated at $1 .000 ,00 0 in today 's dollars and the annual collections for this purpose should be
reserved by the City.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
--·-"'UE AND CC •ST COM I"'· -·--
UNIT REVENUE: $0 .00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $100,000.00 TOTAL COST: $100,000
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(100,000.00) TOTAL PROAT (SUBSIDY): $(100,000)
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY : 0.00%
SUGGE&TI!D FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1110%
19% su rcharge on all building fees except for SFD additions and tenant Improvements. For the current year, transfer
the overage in 5-01 0 Into the reserve fiR1d for this purpose.
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
AS CAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DI!:PARJMENT POSITION m.g UNITTJYE
CD-BUILDING 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
REFERENCE NO.
5..025
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN, UNITS IOIAb COST
$100,000.00 1 $100,000
$100,000.00 $100,000
$100,000.00 $100,000
April28,2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CllY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
MUNI.CODE COMPLIANCE PLN CK & INSP.
R!FERENCI! NO.
5.030
PRIMMV DEPARTMENT
CD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PLAN SET
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To review a set of plans to insure compfiance with all municipal codes. To perform a field inspection to insure that
construction was according to the approved plans .
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST .... ISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $94.81 TOTAL COST: $18,962
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(94.81) TOTAL PROFrT (SUBSIDY): $(18,962)
TOTAL UNITS: 200 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED PI!E POR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
April28,2011
seRVICE
CrTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
MUNI.CODE COMPUANCE PLN CK & INSP .
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS!DON ~ UNITllME
CO-CODE ENFORCWIT CODE ENF.SUPVSR 0.75
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.75
TOTALS 0,75
REFERENCE NO.
8-030
TOTALUNrTS
200
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$94.81 200 $18,962
$94.81 $11,162
SM.81 $11,962
Aprll28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CJTY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE
TEMPORARYUSEPERMrr
REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DI!PARTMENT
VARIOUS
DESCRIPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
S!RVICE RECIPIENT
Christmas Tree Lot, Pumpkin Lot, parking lot sales, sidewalk sales and other temporary uses.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$43 -Pumpkin Lot (#1)
$ 0-Christmas Tree Lot and All Others (#1 1)
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $3.58 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $671.83 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(&11.25) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 12 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$692*
S.099
$43
$8,062
$(8,011)
0.53%
Apftl 28, 2011
SERVICE
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
NO~
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
RSCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT pOSITION :!lU. UN!TDME
COUNCIL SUPPORT CriVClERK Tree & Pumpkin 2.00
COUNCIL SUPPORT DEPUTY CriV CLK 2.00
CO..CODE ENFORCMNT CODE.ENF OFCR 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAl 4.50
CO-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR All Others 1 .00
CD-PlNoiNING SECRETARY 1 .00
CO.. PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAl 5.00
TOTALS 1 .50
REfERENCE NO.
~
TOTAL UNITS
12
UNIT COST ANN. UNIT5 TOTAL COST
$323.06 2 $848
$162.70 2 $325
$4518 2 $80
$530,94 $1,082
$212.&4 10 $2,128
$109.<46 10 $1,095
$377.73 10 $3,777
$700.03 $7,000
H71.83 $1,062
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
RSCAL YEAR 2010-2011
CONDmONAL USE PERMIT: R-1 ZONE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSmON n:eg UNIIDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST 1 .00
CO.P~ING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PL.ANNER B.OO
CD-PLANNING NoUclng Post.~~& 0.00
lYPE SUBTOTAL tUO
TOTALS 10.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-100
TOTAL UNITS
9
UNIJ COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$7-4 .82 9 $673
$212.84 9 $1,916
SS4.73 9 $483
$1.007.28 9 $9,086
S50.00 9 $450
$1,399.87 $12,597
$1,399.67 $12,517
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
CrTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: ALL OTHER
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION :I:l:U UNIT!]ME
CO-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Notlc:et 1.50
CD-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CI).PLANNING SECRETARY 0 .50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PL.ANNER 10.00
CD-PLANNING Nollclng Posblge 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 13.00
TOTALS 13.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-101
TOTAL UNITS
9
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$112.23 9 $1 ,010
$212.~ 9 $1,918
$54.73 9 $493
$1.259.10 9 $11,332
$50.00 9 $450
$1.&18.90 $15,200
$1,688.89 S15,ZQO
Aprfl28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CUP MODIF1CAT10N: R-1 ZONE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERV1CE RECIPENT
To review an application to modify a previously approved CUP In an R-1 zone.
CURRENT FEE STRUCnJRE
$405
RE'Y'ENUE AND CC 1SLCOMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $405.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $896.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(491.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED I"I!E FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1110%
S-102
$405
$196
$(491)
45.20%
April28. 2011
SERVICE
CUP MODIFICATION: R-1 ZONE
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSI110N :!ln. UNITDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST 1.00
CD-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC. PLANNER 4.00
CD-PLANNING Nollclng Postage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL. 6 .50
TOTAL.S 6.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-102
TOTAL. UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$74.82 1 $75
l212.84 1 S213
$54.73 1 $55
$503.84 1 $504
sso.oo 1 $50
$811..03 $816
$896.00 $896
April26,2011
SERVICE
CUP MODIFICATION: ALL OTHER
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
·•·
Unil Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSIT! ON mg UNIIDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST 1--te.ring Nodc::as 1.50
co-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CO-PlANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 6.00
CD-PLANNING Noticing P0$1age 0.00
'TYPE &UBTOTAL 9.00
TOTALS II.GO
REFERENCE NO.
8·103
TOTAL UNITS
5
UNa CQST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$112.23 5 $561
$21Z.84 5 $1,064
$54.73 5 $274
$755.46 5 $3,777
$50.00 5 $250
11,1115.26 $5,926
$1,185.20 $5,9Ztl
~28,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CUP CONDmoN MONITORING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-CODE COMPLIANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
I UNIT 0, SERVICE
I CUP
i
S-10.4
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To collect monies at the Ume of Issuing a CUP so that the City can perform Inspections to monitor compliance with
the approved CUP conditions.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REV~NUE AND CCIST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $505.17 TOTAL COST: $9,093
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(505.17) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(8,083)
TOTAL UNITS: 18 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$520.
Apltl 28, 2011
SERVICE
CUP CONDITION MONITORING
NO~
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSmON nu UNIIDME
CO·PLAHNING ASSOC .PlANNER 1.00
CO..COOE ENFORCMNT CODE ENF.SUPVSR 3 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00
TOTALS 4.00
REP2RI!NCE NO.
S-104
TOTAL UNITS
18
UNIT COST ANN. UNtTS TOTAL COST
$125.81 18 $2,288
$379.23 18 $8,828
$505.14 $9,093
$505.17 $1,093
April28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAl YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ZONE VARIANCE: R-1 ZONE
PRIMARY DEPARTMI!NT
CD-PLANNING
DE!.ICRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process an application requesting a variance from the zoning code in a R-1 Zone.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$325
RF'JI:Utn: AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$1 ,74~
$325 .00
$1,881.00
$(1 ,364.00)
4
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-105
$1,300
$6,756
$(5,456)
19.24%
Aptl28. 2011
SERVICE
ZONE VARiANCE: R~1 ZONE
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
RSCAL YEAR 2010..2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSIDON !!fg UNIJDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Healing Nollces 1.50
CO-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC. PLANNER 10.00
CD-PLANNING Nolidng Poslllge 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 13.00
TOTALS 13.00
REFEIU!NCI! NO.
$.105
TOTALUNrTS
4
UNIT COST ANN. UN!JS TOTAL COST
$112.23 " $448
$212.114 .. $851
SS4.73 4 $219
$1,259.10 4 $5,038
$50.00 4 $200
$1 ,1118.9CJ $6,756
$1,689.00 $6,756
Aprl28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE HO.
ZONE VARIANCE: All OTHER ZONES S-107
PMIIARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF S!IMCE SERVICE RECIPIENT
CD-PLANNING APPLICATION
DESCRIP'nON OF SERVICE
To process an application requesting a variance from the zoning code in all zones except R-1.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$489
REVENUE AND C(IST t-nuDADJS_ON
UNIT REVENUE: $489.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $1,956
UNIT COST: $1,689.00 TOTAL COST: $6,756
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,200.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,800)
TOTAL UNITS: PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.85%
SUGGESTED ,I!E FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$1,740.
Aprll28. 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
ZONE VARIANCE: ALL OTHER ZONES
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITlON n:u. UNIT TIME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Notices 1.50
CD-PLANN ING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 10.00
CD-PLANNING Nollcing Postage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 13.00
TOTALS 13.00
REfERENCE NO.
$.107
TOTAL UNITS
4
UNIT COST AHN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$112.23 " 5449
$212.84 " $851
$54.73 .. $219
$1,259.10 4 $5,036
$50.00 4 $200
$1,611.80 $6,756
$1,689.00 $6,756
AprG 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR2010-2011
ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: R·1 ZONE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT pOSIDON :IIfi UNIT TIME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Nolic:es 1.50
CD-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CO.PL.ANNING SECRETARY 0.50
~PLANNING ASSOC PlANNER 6 .00
CD-PlANNING Nollclng POS\Bge 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL uo
TOTALS t.oo
REFERENCE NO.
S-109
TOTAL. UNITS
1
UNrT COST 6NN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$112.23 1 $112
$212.84 1 $213
$54.73 1 $55
$755.48 1 $755
$50.00 1 $50
$1,1115.26 $1,1115
$1,1115.00 $1,185
Aprl 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAl YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: OTHER ZONES
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD -PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process a request lo modify a pre\Aousty approved zoning variance in a zone other than R-1 .
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$405
RE"Y'":nUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED f!E FOR COST RECOVERY OF : 100%
$1,221.
$405.00
$1,185.00
$(7110 .00)
1
TOTAL REVENUE :
TOTAL COST:
TOTAl PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S.112
$405
$1,185
$(780)
34.111%
Apr1128 , 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FlSCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION : OTHER ZONES
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION !:!e!. UNIT TIME
CD-PlANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing NoCice8 1.50
CO·PlANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 8 .00
CD-PLANNING NoUc:fng PoslaQ• 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 9 .00
TOTALS 9.00
REFERENCE NO.
$-112
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UN!JS TQTAL COST
$112.23 1 $112
$212.84 1 $213
$54.73 1 $55
$755.48 1 $755
sso.oo 1 $50
$1 ,115.26 $1,115
$1,115.00 $1,185
Apri12B,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: MINOR
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCIUPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPUCATION
SERVICE RECIPII!NT
To process a minor variance as detemlned by the Director of Community Development.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$162
Rr>IPO.'UE AND cc ST COMPADIV\W
UNIT REVENUE: $182.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $288.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDYt: $(108.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100'1!.
$276*
S-114
$162
$268
$(106)
60.45%
April28, 2011
SERVICE
ZONE VAR.MODIFICATION: MINOR
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARD!ENT POSITION TYPE UN!IT!ME
CO-PLANNING COM~.DEV.MGR 1 .00
CO-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.50
TOTALS 1.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-114
TOTAL.UMTS
1
UNIT CQST ANN. uNITS TOTAl. COST
$212.84 1 $213
$503 1 sss
$267.57 $288
$261.00 $268
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
APPEALS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SUV1CE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
REFERENCE NO.
5-116
! UNIT OF SERVICE
I
SERVICE RECIPIENT
l REQUEST
To either process an appeal to the Planning Commission of an administrative dedsion. Or, to process an appeal to
the City Council of a Planning Commission ruling .
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$162
---· UE AND CC ,ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUe: $162.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $162
UNIT COST: $933.00 TOTAL COST: $933
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(771.00) TOTAL PROFIT ~SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 17.38%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$961*
April28, 2011
SERVICE
APPEALS
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT PO§IDON .l:ln UNITDME
CO-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Not.lc:es 1.50
CO-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1 .00
CO-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CO.PLANNING ASSOC.PlANNER 4.00
CO-PLANNING Nolldng PD5Wge 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.00
TOTALS 7.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-118
TOTALUNJTS
1
UNIT COST ANN . UNITS TOTAL COST
$112.23 1 $112
$212.84 1 $213
$5<4.73 1 $55
$503 .64 1 $604
$50.00 1 $50
1933.44 $933
$933.00 $933
Apt!! 28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
oeSCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNrf OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Review an application and making recommendations regarding proposed amendments to the City's
Comprehensive General Plan to the Planning Commis si on and the City Council.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$975
REVENUE AND CC ~ST ~nuD.&D•~
UNIT REVENUE: $975.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: 15,426.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,451 .00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY}:
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$5,589*
S-118
$975
$5,428
$(4,451)
17.97%
April 28 , 2011
SERVICE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2G11
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSI!lON mi UN!TTIME
CO-PLANNING RECEPliONIST Hearing Nolk.esx2 3 .00
CO.PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 10.00
CO.Pl.ANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PL.ANNER 20.00
CO-PLANNING Pub.Nollce X 2 0.00
CO-PLANNING Noticing Postage 0 .00
lYPE SUBTOTAL 33.50
TOTALS 33.50
REFERENCE NO.
s~11a
TOTAL UNITS
1
UN!J COST 6NN. UN!IJ TOTAL COST
$224.46 1 $224
12.128.40 1 $2,128
$54.73 1 $55
$2,518.20 1 $2,518
1400.00 1 $.400
1100.00 1 5100
$5,425.78 $5,428
$5,42&.00 $5,421
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ZONE CHANGE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
To process an appUcation for a zone change for a parcel.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$811
SERVICE RECIPteNT
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $811.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: $5,426.00 TOTAL COST:
UMT PROFIT (SUBSIDYt: ${4,815.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGEST!D FE£ FOR COST RECOVERY OP: 100%
$5,589*
S..120
$811
$5,426
$(4,615)
14.95%
Apf1J 28, 2011
SERVICE
ZONE CHANGE
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION nn UNITDME
CO-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Healing Nolkesx2 3.00
CO-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 10.00
CO-PLANNING SECRETARY 0 .50
CO-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 20.00
CD-PLANNING Pub.Notice X 2 0.00
CD-PLANNING Noticing Poslage 0.00
1YPE SUBTOTAL 33.50
TOTALS 33.50
REFERENCE NO.
5-120
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT CQST AHN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$224.46 1 $224
$2.128.40 , $2.128
154.73 1 $55
$2,518.20 , $2,518
$400,00 1 $~00
$100.00 , $100
$5,425.71 $5,428
$5,428.GO $5,426
Aprll28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE
GEN.PLAN AMEND. & ZONE CHANGE
REFERENCE NO.
5·121
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
C[)...PlANNING
DESCRIPnOH OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process an appficatlon for both a general plan amendment and a zone change together.
CURR!NTFEESTRUCTURE
$1,625
REVENUE AND COST COMP .... ,.,..,.,
UNIT REVENUE : $1,625.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: $8,685.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(5,060.00) TOTAL PROAT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED ,EE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$6,885*
$1,625
$6,685
$(5,0t0)
24.31%
Apti12B, ZOtt
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FlSCAL YEAR 2010·2011
GEN .PLAN AMEND. & ZONE CHANGE
NOn
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION !lU UN!TDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing NoliceuZ 3.00
CO-PLANNING COMM.DEV .MGR 10.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.60
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 30.00
CD-P~NING Pub.Notlce X 2 0 .00
CO-PLANNING Nollc:lng Poslage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 43.50
TOTALS 43.50
REFEREHCE NO.
S·121
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$22U6 1 $224
$2,128.40 1 $2,128
$54.73 1 sss
S3,7n.30 1 $3.m
$400.00 1 $400
5100.00 1 $100
$6,684.89 111,6115
$6,685.00 $6,1115
Aprl 28. 2011
SERVICE
CrTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR2010-2011
RES'L PLND DEV: PROVISIONAL PLAN
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DI!PARTMENT POSITION ~ UNITDME
CO.PLANNING RECEPTIONIST t-t.ar1ng Notlcesx2 3 .00
CO-PLANNING COt.it.i.DEV.MGR 10.00
CO-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CO-PLANNING ASSOC.PLAHNER 10.00
CO-PLANNING Noticing Postage 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 23.50
TOTALS 23.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-123
TOTAL UNITS
2
UNIT COST ANN . UNITS TOTAL COST
5224.48 2 $449
$2,128.40 2 $4,257
$54.73 2 $109
$1,2.59.10 z $2,518
$100.00 2 $200
13,766.69 $1,533
$3,766.50 $7,533
Apr128. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010~2Q11
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
RES'L PLND DEV: PRECISE PLAN
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPTTON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SEIIlVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To review the precise plan for a residential planned development.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
$713
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $713.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $3,766.50 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PRORT (SUBSIDY): $(3,053.50) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTI!D FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1 DO%
$3,880*
S-125
$1,426
$7,533
$(6,107)
18.93%
April 28 , 2011
SERVICE
RES'l PLND DEV: PRECISE PLAN
NOtE
CITY OF TEMPlE CllY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Unlts
DEPARTMENT POSfDON TYPE UNITJ!ME
Co-PlANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Noticesx2 3 .00
C~NING COMM.DEV.MGR 10.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 10.00
CO.PLANNING Nodclng PosCage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 23 .50
TOTALS 23.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-125
TOTALUNrTS
2
UNrT COST ANN. UNITS TQ!Ab COST
$22-4..48 2 $449
$2,128.40 2 $4.257
$64.73 2 $109
$1,259.10 2 $2,518
$100.00 2 $200
$3,766.19 $7,533
$3,761.50 $7,533
April28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FlSCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REIIERI!NCI!. NO.
TEMPORARY SIGN/BANNER REVIEW
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPllON OF SERVICE
UHJT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECJPIENT
S-126
To process a request for a temporary sign or banner lasting 30 days or less which can be approved at the counter.
A business can obtain three (3) pennits in a calendar )lear.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND CC 1ST C_OMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$115*
$0.00
$111.75
${111.75)
400
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
so
$44,700
$(44,700)
0.00%
April 28. 2011
SERYICt;
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
TEMPORARY SIGNIBANNER REVIEW
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSinON !!ei UNIIDME
C[).Pl.ANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 0.17
CD-COOE ENFORCMNT CODE ENF OFCR 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAl. 1.17
TOTALS 1.17
REFERENCE NO.
S-128
TOTAL UNITS
400
UN!J COST ANN. UNITS JO!AL COST
$2.UO 400 S8,5GO
$90.35 400 138,140
$111.75 $44,700
$111.75 S.U,700
Ap.rll28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SIGN REVIEW
PRIMARY DI!PARTMI!NT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPl10N OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To review the application for a single sign to ensure that It oonfocms to the City's sign ordinance.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$42
--·-· UE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $42.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: $125.91 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(83.11) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S-127
$1,890
$5,686
$(3,776)
33.38%
April28,2011
SERVICE
SIGN REVIEW
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT pOS!DON :m:g UNITDME
CO. PLANNING ASSOC.PlANNER 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1 .GO
TOTALS 1.00
REFERENCE NO.
5-127
TOTAL UNITS
45
UNIT COST MN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$125.91 45 $5,868
$125.91 $5,6H
$125.91 $5,666
April28. 2011
SERVICE
SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE aTY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201G-2011
REFeRENCE NO.
S-128
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To review a comprehensive sign program to establish the design and size of multiple signs within a larger
industrial, commercial or residen1ial project or to review a revision to an approved sign program .
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
RI!:\/~Nll~ AND C< 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST : $495.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY}: $(495.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1110%
$0
$ot95
$(495)
0.00%
Apr1128,2011
SERVICE
SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW
NOTE
ctTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
!
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARJMENI POSITION n:u. UNIT TIME
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CO.PlANNING ASSOC .PlANNER 3.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00
TOTALS 4.00
REFERENCE NO.
$-128
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNrT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAl, COST
$.54.73 1 $55
$440.69 , $#1
$495.42 $495
$495.00 $495
April28, 2011
SERVICE
SITE PLAN REVIEW-MINOR
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
REFERENCE NO.
S-129
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process an appllcalion for a slte plan and design review for property improvements not including a new
structure or as determined by the Community Development Director.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$82
REVENUE AND CC 1ST rniiD4Du::n~o.~
UNIT REVENUE: $82.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $62.96 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): 519.04 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$2,050
$1,574
$476
TOTAL UNITS: 25 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 130.24%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1 00')1,
$65*
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
SITE PLAN REVIEW-MINOR
NOlE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
D!PARTMENT POSITION nf! UNIT TIME
CO.PLANN!NG ASSOC .Pl.ANNER 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0..50
REFERENCE NO.
$-129
TOTAL UNrTS
25
UNIT COST 6NN. UNITS TOTAL, COST
$82.98 25 $1,574
$62.96 $1,574
$12.16 $1,574
AprD 28, 2011
SERVICE
SITE PLAN REVJEW..MAJOR
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FiSCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS!TlON nn UN!ITlME
CO.f'tANNING ASSOC.PI..ANNER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAl. 3.00
TOTALS 3.00
REFERENC! NO.
S-130
TOTAl. UNITS
150
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$377.73 150 $56,680
un.73 $56,6410
$377.13 $56,660
Aprii2B , 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CRY. CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SITE PLAN REV1EW-APPEAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CO..Pl.ANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPEAL
To process an appeal challenging the denial of a site plan.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
... ro-.o. UE AND CC 1ST CO.MPARISON
UNIT REVENUE : $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $700.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(700.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 5 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SOOOESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S-135
$0
$3,500
$(3,500)
0.00%
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
SITE PLAN REVIEW·APPEAL
NO~
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Unlls
DEPARTMENT POS!DON DH UNttDMI5
CD-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 1 .00
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 3 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.0G
TOTALS 5,.0(1
REFERENCE NO.
$-135
TOTAL UNITS
5
UNIT COSJ AHN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$212.&4 5 51.064
$109.46 5 $547
$377.73 5 $1,888
$700.03 $3,500
$700.00 $3,500
April28, 2011
SERVK:E
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
RSCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION nn. UNITDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Notices 1.50
CP.PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 10.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0 .50
CO-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 10.00
CO-PLANNING Nolicing Poslage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 22.00
TOTALS 22.00
REFERENCE NO.
S..141
TOTALUMTS
"
UNIT COST ANN. UN!JS TOTAl. COST
$112.23 4 $449
$2,128.40 4 $8,514
$54.73 4 $211
$1,259.10 4 $5,038
$50.00 4 $200
$3,604.46 $14,418
$3,604.50 $14,411
Aprt 28, 201 1
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 D-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPT10N OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
To process an appfication for a tentative tract map.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
$611 plus $161 per lollunit charged against an initial deposit of $5,620
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $1,777.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $4,396.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFrT (SUBSIDY): $(2,619.00) TOTAL PROFrT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNrTS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUOOESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1 DO%
$4,528"
S·143
$3,554
$8,792
$(5,238)
40.42%
April 28, 2D11
SERVICE
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COSTDET~L~RKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201G-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT PO SIDON nn UNIT TIME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Nolicesx2 3.00
CD-PLANNING COMM.OEV.MGR 10.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC .PlANNER 15.00
CD-PLANNING Noticing Poelage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAl. 28.50
TOTALS 28.50
REFERENCE NO.
S..143
TOTAl. UNITS
2
UNJT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$22 ... 48 2 $449
$2,128.40 2 $-4,257
$54.73 2 $109
$1,888.65 2 S3,7n
$100.00 2 $200
$4,396.2.4 $8,792
14,396.00 $8,7t2
April 28 , 2011
SERVICE
TENTATIVE MAP MODIFICATION
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FtSCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS1l10N nu UNITDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Hearing Nollcu 1.50
CD-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 3 .00
CO -PLANNING SECRETARY 0 .50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 3 .00
CD-PLANNING Nolldng Posl8ge 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 8 .00
TOTALS 8 .00
REFERENCE NO.
S-144
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$11 2.23 1 1112
$638.52 1 $639
$54.73 1 sss
$377.73 1 $378
sso.oo 1 sso
$1,2!3.21 $1,233
$1,233.00 $1,233
Aprtl 28, 2011
SERVICE
FINAL MAP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
REFERENCE NO,
S·145
UNlT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
r----------------------------~-------------------~------------------------~ DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing a final map to determine the extent to whlch it complies wilh appropriate code requirements as well as
the conditions described in lhe Tentative Map.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$161 plus County Fees
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $181.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $966
UNIT COST: $432.50 TOTAL COST: $2,595
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(271.50) TOTALPROFIT(SUB~DY): $(1,629)
TOTAL UNITS: 6 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.23%
SUGOESTED FEE FOR COST ReCOVERY OF: iiNI%
$445* plus County Fees
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
FINAL MAP
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS!DON ~ UNIT TIME
CO-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-Pl.ANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50
TOTALS 3.50
REFERENCE. NO.
S-145
TOTAL UNITS
8
UNIT COST ANN. UMTS TOTAL COST
$54.73 6 $328
5377.73 6 $2.266
$432.46 52,595
$431.50 $2,595
April28,2011
CITY OF TEMPlE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAl YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TIME EXTENSION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE REaPIENT
APPLICATION
Review administratively a request for an extension of time to complete a planning entitlement.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$244
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $244.00 TOTAl REVENUE:
UNIT COST: ~2.33 TOTAl COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(188.33) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY}:
TOTAL UNITS: 3 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S·147
$732
$1,297
$(565)
56.44%
Ap11128, 2011
SERVICE
TIME EXTENSION
NOT£
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010..2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT posmoN rru UNITDME
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50
TOTALS 3.50
REFERENCI! NO.
5·147
TOTAL UNITS
3
UNIT COST ANN . UNITS TOTAL COST
$54 .73 3 $184
$377.73 3 $1,133
$432.48 $1,291
$432.33 $1,287
Ap111 28,2011
SERVICE
SUBDMSION MAP AMENDMENT
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
QEPABTMENI POSITION ~ UNIT TIME
CD-PtANNING RECEPTIONIST 1 .00
CD-PlANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PL.ANNER 5.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.50
TOTALS 7.50
RER:RENCE NO.
5-150
TOTAL UNiTS
1
UNIT COS! ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
17<4.82 1 $75
1212.84 1 $213
$54.73 1 $55
1829.55 1 $630
1971.94 $972
$t12.0CI $972
April28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
LOT COMBINATION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
To process the combination of two lots into one new lot.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
S244
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND CO~T C_OMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $244.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $847.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(603.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S-152
1244
$847
$(603)
28.81%
April28, 2011
SERVICE
LOT COMBINATION
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CJTY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNITDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST Heartng Notica 1.50
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC. PLANNER 5 .00
CD-PLANNING Noticing Postage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.00
TOTALS 7 .00
REFERENCE NO.
S-152
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS JOTAJ. COST
$112.23 1 $112
S54.73 1 $55
$828.55 , $630
$50.00 1 $50
$1148.51 $1147
$1147.00 $847
Apli 28.2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010~2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT-MINOR
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCIUPllON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process a minor adjustment to a lot line between two pan:els.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$325 plus deposit of $649
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $325.00 TOTAL REYeNUe:
UNIT COST: $847.00 TOTAL. COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(522.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$872*
S-154
S325
$847
$(522)
38.37%
April 28, 2011
SERVIC!
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT-MINOR
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNIIDME
CD-PLANNING RECCPTlONIST Hearing Notices 1.50
CO-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CO-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 5.00
CO-PLANNING Nolldng Postage 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.00
TOTALS 7 .00
REFERENCE NO.
8-154
TOTAl. UNITS
1
UNJT COST 6NN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$112.23 1 $112
$54.73 1 $55
$629.55 1 $630
$50.00 1 $50
$648.51 $147
$147.00 $147
April28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
F.SCAL YEAR 2010-2011
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM CEQA
REFERENCE NO.
5-156
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CO-PlANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process a categorical exempdon from the california Environmental Quality Act for a proposed project.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$75
R~w••E AND CC ~ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $75.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $125.89 TOTAL COST :
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(50.89) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 9 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1110%
$130 plus LA County Clerk FlUng Fee
$675
$1,133
$(458)
59.58%
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201()..2011
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM CEQA
NOll:
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSmON TYPE UNITDME
CD·PlANNING ASSOC .PLANNER 1 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00
TOTALS 1.00
REFERENCE NO.
5-156
TOTAL UNITS
9
UNIT COST ANN · UNIJS TOTAL COST
$125.111 9 $1 ,133
$125.91 $1,133
$125.19 $1,133
.April28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NEGAnVE (ENVIRON.) DECLARAnON
PRIMARY DEPAR111ENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPt!NT
To determine that a project has no impact on the environment according to CEQA guidelines.
CURRENT JlEE STRUCTURE
$150
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: 1150.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: 53n.1a TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY}: $(227.78) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 9 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S.157
$1,350
S3~D
$(2,050)
39.71%
Aplt1 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
NEGATIVE (ENVIRON.) DECLARATION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT PO SIDON nn UNITDME
C~NING ASSOC .PLANNER 3 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.09
TOTALS 3.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-157
TOTALUNrTS
9
UNrT CQST ANN. UNJJS TOTAl COST
$377.73 8 $3.400
S3n.73 $3,400
$377.71 $3~00
April28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
REFERENCE NO.
EIRJMITIGATED NEGATIVE DEC. REVIEW S-158
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
REPORT
SERVICE RECIPtENT
To review an environmental Impact report or a mitigated negative declaration for a proposed project.
CURRENTFEES~UCTURE
None
... _._...'IUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT fSUBSIO~:
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1DO%
$0 .041
$0.041
$0.00
1
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTALPROFrr(SUB~D~:
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
Actual cost of staff, County and City Consultants against and Initial deposit determined by staff
$0
$0
so
0.00%
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
EIRIMITIGATEO NEGATIVE DEC. REVIEW
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMI!.NI posiTioN nn UNIT11ME
0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0 .00
TOTALS 0.00
-
REFERENCE NO.
5-158
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 so
suo so
$0.00 $0
Apl11 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
S!RVICE REFERENCE NO.
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE & NECESSITY
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRSPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPUCATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-160
To file a statement with the Alcoholic Beverage Commission that an applicant who proposes to sell or serve
alcoholic beverages can be approved for the public's convenience.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTUR!
None
R~ru-=u••-= AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100"'
$0.00
$750.00
$(750.00)
2
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY :
$1,500
$(1,500)
0.00%
Apri128,2011
SERVICE
CrTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE & NECESSITY
NOTE
Unit Costs are en Average of Total Units
DEMRIMENT POSITION nu. UNITDME
C[).f'lANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 1 .00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 1 .00
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.Pl..ANNER 3.00
CD-PLANNING Nodc:klg Paslage 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00
TOTALS 5.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-180
TOTAL UNITS
2
UNIT COST NfN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$212.&1 2 S42e
S10U8 2 $219
$377.73 2 $755
$50.00 2 $100
$750.03 $1,5GO
$750.00 $1,500
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATlON
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION nn UN!IDME
CD-PLANNING COt.tM.DEV.MGR 1.00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 1.00
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00
TOTALS 5.00
REFERENCE NO.
5-184
TOTALUNfTS
5
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$212.84 5 $1 ,064
5108.46 5 $547
$377.73 5 S1.889
$700.03 $3,500
1700.00 $3,500
April28 ,2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
REFERENCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
AGREEMENT
S!RVICE RECIPIENT
S-168
To enter Into en agreement with a developer specifying each party's responsibilities and contributions for a
proposed project.
CURRENT FEE STRUClURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Actual cost of staff, County and City Consultants against and initial deposit determined by staff
$0
$0
$0
0.00'%
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NOTe
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSIDON ~ UNITT1ME
0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL o.oo
TOTALS 0.00
REFERENCE NO.
S..168
TOTALUNTS
2
UNIT COST ANN. UM!TS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.GG so
$41.00 so
Apr1128,2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR2010-20f1
RI!PI!RI!Nce NO.
ZONING LETTER S.170
PRIMARY OEPARTM!NT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
LETTER
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To prepare a letter al the request of a property owner or realtor specifying the zoning of a parcel and what
development would be acceptable in that zone.
CURR£NT fEE STRUCTURE
None
RI:V~.a••E AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $232.40 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(232.40) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 5 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED Fl!l! POR COST RECOVERY OP': 100%
$239.
$0
$1,162
$(1,182)
0.00%
April 28 , 2011
SERVICE
ZONING LETTER
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR2010-2011 .
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARJ'MENT POSITION neg UNITDME
CO-PLANNING COMM.DEV.MGR 0.50
CD-P~NN!NG ASSOC .PlANNER 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL. 1.50
TOTALS 1.50
REFERENCE NO.
5·170
TOTALUNYTS
5
UNIT COST ANN . UNITS TOTAL COST
$106.42 5 $532
$125.91 5 $830
$232.33 $1,162
$2S2..40 11,182
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010..2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BUS.REGUL.ATORY PMT ANNUAL RENEWAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRiflYTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPUCATlON
S·202
SERVICE REctPIENT
To perform a background check on a business owner and/or employee 10 protect the public safety. The
background check is performed by the LA County Sheriff's Office. Annual renewal only as the initial pefmit is
processed with a new business appHcatlon.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$70
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNJT REVENUE: $70.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $22,610
UNIT COST: $1C .11 TOTAL COST: $27,168
UNIT PROFJT (SUBSIDY): $(14.11) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(4,558)
TOTAL UNITS: 323 PCT. COST RECOVERY : 83.22%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$87*
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. CAUFORNJA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
BUS .REGULATORY PMT ANNUAL RENEWAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMEMI POS!DON ~ UNITnME
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY Renewal 0 .33
SHERIFF OPERATIONS Bkgmd.Check 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL. 0.33
TOTALS 0.33
REFERENCE NO.
5-202
TOTAL UNITS
323
UNJI COST ANN. UNITS TOTAb COST
$36.12 323 $11.687
$47.99 323 $15,501
$84.11 $27,168
$N.11 $27,161
Aprit28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NEW/MOVED/CHANGED BUSINESS PROC'G
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SI!RVICE
APPLICATION
S-203
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To enter data fore new/moved/changed business Into the computer, print a business Hcense and mall to the
applicant. To perfonn a field inspection to insure compliance w it h all municipal codes and to issue a Certificate of
Occupancy.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 • Regular Commercial (#55; $1 ,375)
$95 -Regulated Commercial (#15; $1 ,425)
$0 ~Out of Town Business (#176; $0)
$70 -Regulated Individual (#1 0; $700)
(Note: In addition to the above processing fees, a new business would also pay the fnt year business tax.)
A~ll.: AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$320•-Regular Commercial
$521•-Regu lated Commercial
$28• ~Out of Town Business
$229• ~ Regulated Individual
$13.117 TOTAL REVENUE:
$123.98 TOTAL COST:
5(110.29) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
256 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$3,500
S31,734
Sf28,2U)
11 .03%
(Note: In addition to the above regulatory processing fees, a new business WOlAd also pay the first year business
laX .)
Aprlf 28.2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FlSCAL YEAR 2010-2011
NEW/MOVED/CHANGED BUSINESS PROC'G
NOT!
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
PEPABIMENT POSITION nn UN!IDME
CO.PlANNING SECRETARY Regular CGm 'l 0.75
CO-PlANNING ASSOC. PLANNER 0 .50
CD-BUILDING BLDG INSPECTOR 0 .50
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT CODE ENF .SUPVSR 0.50
CO.CODE ENFORCMNT CODE .ENF OFCR 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.75
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY Regulaled Com1 1.00
co-PLANNING ASSOC.PLANNER 0.50
ct:HJUILDING BLDG INSPECTOR . 0.50
SHERIFF OPERATIONS Bkgmd .Chedl 0.00
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT CODE ENF.SUPVSR 0.50
CO.COOE ENFORCMNT COOE .ENF OfCR 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3 ,00
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY Out .()f. Town 0.25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.25
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY Regulaled lndiY. 0.50
SHERIFF OPERATIONS Bkgmd.CMck 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 6.50
REfERENCE NO.
5-203
TOTAL UNITS
258
uNIT COST ANN . UNITS TOTAL COST
$82.10 55 $4,518
$82.98 55 $3.463
$57.42 55 $3,158
$83.21 55 $3,477
$45.18 55 $2,4115
$310.87 $17,191
$109.411 15 $1.1142
$62.98 15 $944
$57.42 15 $861
$167.95 15 52,5111
$83.21 15 $948
$45.18 15 $678
$506.18 $7,593
$27.37 178 $4,817
$27.37 $4,1111
$54.73 10 $547
$187.15 10 $1,680
$222.68 $2,2Z7
$123.96 $31 ,734
Aprft 28,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
SERVICE
NEW HOME BUSINESS PROCESSING
REFERENCE NO.
5-204
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To process an appUcation to operate a business out of a home In a residenlial zone.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
Note: The $64 Is a Business Tax and charged annualy.
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $131.39 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY}: $(131.39) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 100 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$135*
$0
$13,139
$(13,139)
0.00%
Apctl28. 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
NEW HOME BUSINESS PROCESSING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNIT11ME
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANN ING ASSOC.PLANNER 0.25
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT CODE .ENF OFCR 0 .50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.25
TOTALS 1.25
REFERENCE NO.
5-204
TOTAL UNITS
100
UNIT COB! AHN. UNITS TOTAL CO ST
$54.73 100 $5,-473
$3U8 100 $3,148
$-15.18 100 $4,518
$131.39 $13,131
$131.31 $13,139
April 28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201G-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROCESSING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD..CODE ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RENTAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To initially register and inspect a resldenUal property that is to be operated as a rental.
CURR!NTfEESTRUCTURE
None
...... _ .... ••c AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $131.40 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(131.40) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 50 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST AECOYERV OP: 100%
$135*
S-206
$6,570
$(6,570)
0.00%
AprU 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
RESIDENnAL RENTAL PROCESSING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTUENT POS!DON mi UNIIJIME
CD-PLANNING SECRETARY 0.50
CD-PLANNING ASSOC.PlANNER 0.25
CD-CODE ENFORCMNJ COOE.ENF OFCR 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.25
TOTALS 1.25
REfERENCe NO.
5-208
TOTAL. UNITS
50
UNJI COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$5-4.73 50 $2,737
$31 ... 8 50 $1,574
$45.18 50 $2,259
$131.39 $8,5TG
$131AO $6,570
AprQ 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFER!NCE NO.
RESIDENTIAL RENTAL INSPECTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-CODE-ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RENTAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-207
To perfonn an annual inspection of a residential property that has been registered to operate as a rental property.
The Inspection fee is charged annually based on the Inspection being performed every two years. Units are after
the initial registration.
CURRI!HT FI!E STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $72.80 TOTAL COST: $72,800
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(72.10) TOTAL PROAT (SUBSIDY): $(72,800)
TOTAL UNITS: 1,000 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED 11!1!. P'OR COST RECOV!RY 01': 100%
Apri128, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
RESIDENTlAL RENTAL INSPECTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
D£PARTM!!NT PO SinON J:lH UNITJ!ME
C[)..PLANNING SECRETARY 0.17
~ODE ENFORCMNT COOE ENF.SUPVSR 0.25
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT COOE.ENF OFCR 0 .25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.67
TOTALS 0.67
REFERENCE NO.
S-207
TOTALUNn'S
1,000
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$18.61 1.000 $111 ,810
$31.60 1,000 131 ,600
$22.59 1.000 $22,590
$72.80 $72,800
$72.80 $72,800
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR201G-2011
SERVICE
GARAGESALEREGULAnON
REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CO-CODE ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPII!NT
To issue a permit for a garage sale to enforce the three (3) per year limit per property.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPADI~niU
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: $5.99 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PRO AT (SUBSIDY): $(5.99) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 800 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGOESTI!D !fEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S-208
$0
$3,594
$(3,594)
0.00%
April28. 2011
SERVICE
GARAGE SALE REGULATION
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT PQSmON ~ UNIIDME
CD-PLANNING RECEPTIONIST 0.08
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.08
TOTALS 0.08
REFERENCE NO.
5-208
TOTAL. UNITS
600
UNJ! COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL. COST
$5.119 600 $3,594
SUt $3,594
~--53,594
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
REFERENCE NO.
VEHICLE IMPOUND/RELEASE CHARGE S-209
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
SHERIFF VEHICLE
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
To recover the Initial cost of impounding a vehicle for cause and lhe subsequent release of that vehicle.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$95
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $95.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $140.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(45.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$144*
$95
$140
${45)
67.86%
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
VEHICLE IMPOUND/RELEASE CHARGE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARJMENT PO SIDON !:Yfi UNITDME
SHERIFF OPERATIONS SHERIFF DEPUTY 1 .08
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1 .08
TOTALS 1 .08
REFERENCE NO.
S.209
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNa COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$140.19 1 $140
$140.18 $140
$140.01» $140
Aprll28.2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITYr CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERVICE
ANIMAL CONTROL
REFERENCE NO.
8-210
PRIMARY DEPARTWIENT
CO-ANIMAL CONTROL
DESCRIPT10N Of SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPtENT
VARIOUS
To inswe that dogs are vaccinated for rabies by licensing . To remove strays and wild animals from the community
ror public health. Shelter service and some patrol is by County contract.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Altered-$17 plus additional $9 if deUnquent (#1,436; $24,412)
Unaltered-$34 plus additional $18 If delfnquent (#722; $24,548)
Senior (65+)-SO; $9 tf delinquent (#400; $0)
(Delinquent income is the balance of $13.040)
Impound Redemption: (Shelter Revenue not City Revenue)
1st Offense -$35
2nd Offense -$50
3rd Offense -$60
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $24.2A
UMTCOST: $131.42
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(107.18)
TOTAL UNITS: 2,558
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 25%
Altered-$24* plus additional $13'" If deUnquent
Unaltered-$47* plus additional $25* if delinquent
Senior (65+)-$0; $13*lt deUnquent
Impound Redemption: (Sheller Revenue not City Revenue)
1st Offense-$49*
2nd Offense -$70'"
3rd Offense -$84*
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$62,000
$336,172
$(274,172)
18.44%
April 28, 201 t
SERVICE
ANIMAL CONTROL
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPAR!MENT POSITION ~ UNITDME
CO-ANIMAL CONTROl SECRETARY 0 .22
CD·ANIMAL CONTROL PUB.SAFETY OFCR 0 .13
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL ANIMAL CTRL OFCR 0 .62
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL PART-TIME 0 .116
CO-ANIMAl CONTROl OVERTIME 0.02
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL JPA-Paltoi,Misc. 0.00
CO-ANIMAL CONTROL Ucenalng & Misc . 0 .00
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL JPAShelter o.co
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.05
TOTALS 1.05
REFERENCE NO.
S·210
TOTAL UNITS
2,558
UNIT COST AHN. UN!D !DIN, COS!
$17.30 2,558 $44,253
$15.20 2,558 $38,882
$55.1<1 2,558 $141,048
$2.35 2.558 $8,011
$0.78 2.558 $1,995
$7.72 2,558 $19,748
$1.50 2.558 $3,837
$31.43 2.558 $80,398
$131.42 $336,172
$131.42 m&,1n
I
I
I
Aclril 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
REPLACEMENT DOG LICENSE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
To replace a dog license that has been losl.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
LICENSE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND CC fST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNrTCOST: TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT I SUBSIDY): $16.40) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 15 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
sr
S-212
$0
$96
$(96)
0.00%
Aplll28.2011
SERVICE
REPLACEMENT DOG UCENSE
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
ASCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPABJMENT POSIJlON TYPE UNITDME
CO.ANIMAL CONTROL SECRETARY 0.08
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL Repi.LiceMe 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.08
TOTALS 0.08
REFERENCE NO.
5-212
TOTAL UNITS
15
UN!! COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL CQST
$6.23 15 $93
$0.20 15 $3
$6.43 $86
$6.40 $98
Apri 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERV.CE REFERENCE NO.
DEAD PET PICK-UP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERV.CE
PET
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-214
The pet owner can take a dead pet directly to the Shelter. This service Is for the animal control officer to pick-up
lhe dead pet at the owner's home and deliver It to the Shelter.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $86.7-4 TOTAL COST: $2,336
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(66.74) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(2.336)
TOTAL UNITS: 35 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FDR COST RECOVERY OF: 1110%
$69 .. plus the Shelter Charge to the City (ranges from $40 to $120)
April28. 2011
SERVICE
DEAD PET PICK..UP
NO'M
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARJMENT POSITION nn UNIT TIME
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL ANIMAL CTRL OFCR 0 .75
TYPE SUBTOTAL o.75
TOTALS 0.75
REFERENCE NO.
S-214
TOTAL UNITS
35
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$66.75 35 $2,336
$66.75 $2,338
$66.74 $2,338
Aprli2B, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR2010.2D11
HOME QUARANTINE INSPECTION
REFERENCE NO.
5-216
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-ANIMAL CONTROL
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OP SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
QUARANTINE
This service is for the Ume of the animal control off~eer to determine that a pet Involved in a biUng can be
quaranUned at home instead of at the Shelter. Counseling is given to both parties and the officer insures that the
animal Is secured.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMP_ARI.SON
UNIT REVENUE: so.oo TOTAL REVENUE: so
UNIT COST: $133.50 TOTAL COST: $1,335
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(133.50) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(1,335)
TOTAL UNITS: 10 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$138*
Aprll 28, 2011
SERVICE
HOME QUARANTINE INSPECTION
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEfARTMENT POSITION nn UNIIDME
CO..ANit.W.. CONTROL ANIMAL CTRL OFCR 1.50
lYPE SUBTOTAl 1.50
TOTALS 1.50
REPEREHCE NO.
S-218
TOTAL UNITS
10
UNIT COST MN. UNITS TOTAl, COST
$133.50 10 $1.335
$1!3.50 $1.335
$133.50 $1,335
Apri128, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT·ANNUAL
PRIMARY DEPART111!NT
CD-PARKING ADMIN.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
S-222
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
PERMIT
To Issue a penn It for overnight street pari(lng. The permit Is a calendar year permit and the fee is pro.rated by
calendar quarter.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
1st Quarter: $77.00-Regular; $52.00-Senior (#s 594, 6; $45,738, $312)
2nd Quarter. $59.50-Regular: $44.50 ·Senior (#s 223, 2; $13,268.50, $89)
Jrd Quarter. $47.00-Regular; $37.00-Senior (#s 99, 1: $4,653, $37)
4th Quarter: $34.50 -Regular; $29.50 -Senior (#a 50, 1: $1, n5, $29.50)
The above fees include a $22 processing charge with the balance being an enforcement cost of $12 .50 per quarter
for Regular and $7.50 per quarter for Seniors. $77 is a likely typo for $72.
RE"-.'ENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $67.47 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNJTCOST: $72.80 TOTAL COST:
UNJT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(5.13) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 978 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Increase the current $22 processing charge to $28* for all permits
Enforcement component of Regular permits ~uld be $13 .71• per quarter.
Enforcement component of Senior permits would be $6.22* per quarter (40o/o subsidy).
$85,852
$70,855
$(5,003)
92.1M%
April28 .2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT·ANNUAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
pEPARTMI!NI PQSIDON IU§ UN!TDME
CD-PARKING ADMIN . SECRETARY Proce11lng 0.33
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.33
SHERIFF OPERATIONS SHERIFF DEPUTY Shan! Ofenbannt 0.10
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.10
TOTALS 0.43
REFERENCE NO.
5·222
TOTAL UNITS
978
UNIT C(OSJ ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$27.24 978 $26,586
$27.24 $26,588
$13.31 3,328 $44,2&9
$1U1 $44,269
$72.60 $70,155
Aprll28,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT-MONTHLY
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PARKING ADMIN.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To issue monthly overnight panting permits. Only I'NO are permitted within a calendar year.
CURRENT PEE STRUCTURE
$20 -Monthly with a maximum of two within a calendar year
S-223
(Note: This permit charge only covers the processing cost. There is no amount for enforcement in the current
permit fee.)
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$48*
$20.00
$46.60
$(26.60)
120
TOTAL RI:YeNUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$2.400
$5,582
$(3,182)
42.92%
Apll 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR2010-2011
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT -MONTttLY
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
QEPARTMENT PO SIDON .Ilfi UNITllME
SHERIFF OPERATIONS SHERIFF DEPUTY Share Of Enrotc:emnl 0 .20
CD-PARKING ADMIN. SECRETARY Proeesslng 0.25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.45
TOTALS 0.45
REFERENCE NO.
S-223
TOTAL UNITS
120
UNIT COST AHN. UNIJS TOTAL COST
525.96 120 $3.115
$20.64 120 $2,477
$48.60 $5,592
$48.60 $5,592
AprU 28 . 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT-DAILY
REFERENCE NO.
5·224
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PARKING ADMIN.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To operale a machine that dispenses an overnight parking permit and to cover a portion of the cost of Sheriff &
City staff that enforce the "no partdng• statute.
CURRENT F£E STRUCTURE
$2
liE AND CCIST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $2...00 TOTAL REVENUE: $54,840
UNIT COST: $2.70 TOTAL COST: $74,034
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(0.70) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(19,194)
TOTAL UNITS: 27,420 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 74.07%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
ASCAL YEAR 2010-2011
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT-DAILY
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSmON nn UNJTDME
SHERIFF OPERATIONS SHERIFF DEPUTY Shan! OJ Enlorcemnl 0.02
CO.PARKING ADMIN . PUB.SAFETY OFCR Machine Opna 0.00
CD-PARKING ADMIN . DP•M~+Paper 0 .00
lYPE SUBTOTAL. O.G2
TOTALS 0.02
REFERENCE NO.
S-224
TOTAL. UNITS
27,420
UNIT COST AHN, uNITS TCIAb COST
12.16 2M20 159,227
$0.42 27.420 $11.516
10.12 27.420 $3,280
$2.71t $74,034
$2.70 $74,034
-
Aprll21,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT APPEAL
PRIMARY DI:PARTNENT
CD-PARKING ADMIN.
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPEAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To hear an appeal of a parking permit applicant whose application has been denied
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $273.14 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $C273.84) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAl UNJTS: PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S-225
$0
$12,323
$(12,323)
0.00%
ApriJ28,2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010..2011
OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT APPEAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
OEPAAJMENT POS!DON .n:.u UNITmiE
CO-PARKING ADMIN. SECRETARY 0.25
CO-PARKING ADMIN . PUB .SAFETY OFCR 2.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.25
TOTALS 2.25
REFERENCE NO.
S-225
TOTAL UNITS
.45
UNIT COST ANN. UNIIJ TOTAL COST
$20.~ ~s $021
$253.20 ~5 $11,394
$273..14 $12,323
$273.114 $12,W
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
REFERENCE NO.
ANNUAL PARKING PMT-TSFR & REPLCMNT S~226
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PARKING ADMIN.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To prepare a new annual parking permit when the original permit has been lost, surrendered or destroyed.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$10
REVENUEANDCOSTCOMP~SON
UNIT REVENUE: $10.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $20.63 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10.63) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 30 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$21*
$300
$619
$(319)
48.47%
AprD 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
ANNUAL PARKING PMT-TSFR & REPLCMNT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNITllME
CD-PARKING ADMIN . SECRETARY 0.25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.25
TOTALS 0.25
REFERENCE NO.
S-226
TOTAL UNIT$
30
UNIT COST ANN. UNfTS TOTAL COST
$20.64 30 $619
S2G.84 $119
$20.83 $619
Aplfl28,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CITATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PARKING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PARKJNG ADMIN.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
CITATIONS
S~230
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Citations are a fine to discourage illegal behavior. This service is included to show the cost of issuing the fine to
insure that the fine is sufficient.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$45 w Avg. Citation Amount (#15,500, 75% collection rate)
RE"v'-:NUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $33.75 TOTAL REVENUE: $523,125
UNIT COST: $19.60 TOTAL COST: $303,800
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $14.15 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $219,325
TOTAL UNITS: 15,500 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 172.19%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1CIO%
Aprli2B, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
CITATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PARKING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSIDON :r£.U UNIT TIME
CD-PARKING ADMIN . SECRETARY 0 .00
CD-PARKING ADMIN. PUB.SAFETY OFCR 0 .01
CD-PARKING ADMIN. PARKING CTRL OFCR 0 .13
CD-PARKING ADMIN . PART-TIME 0.08
CD·PARKING ADMIN . Court Fees 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.23
TOTALS 0.23
~FERENCE NO.
S-230
TOTAL UNITS
15,500
UNJJ COST ANN, UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.19 15,500 $2,945
$0.87 15 ,500 $13,-485
$7.79 15 ,500 $120.745
$3.63 15.600 $56,265
$7.12 15,500 $110,3110
$19.&0 $303,100
$19.10 $303,800
Apri128, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CrrY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
ASCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
INSPECTION FOR CODE COMPUANCE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-CODE COMPLIANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERV1CE
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-235
To inspect a property after noUcing the owner about a violation to confirm that the violation has been corrected.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
$0 -1st Inspection
$0 -2nd Inspection
$40 -Each subsequent lnspeclion
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
-... -... uE AND COST COMP&Du::nu
$0.04 TOTAL REVENUE:
$45.11 TOTAL COST:
$(45.14) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
1,021 PCT. COST RECOVERY :
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 1DO¥.
$0 -1st Inspection
$0 ~ 2nd Inspection
$47•-Each subsequent Inspection
$46,129
$(46,089)
0.09%
Apl11 28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
INSPECTION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DI!PARJMENI POSIT10N nn UNUDME
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT COOE.ENF OFCR 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
REFERENCE NO.
5-235
TOTALUNI'B
1,021
UN!J COSJ NtN, UNITS TOTAl, COST
545.1 8 1.021 ~.129
$45.18 $46,129
$45.18 $48,129
April 28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CJTY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SUBSTD.RECORDATION PLCMNT & REMOVAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPllON OF SERVICE
UNIT OP SERVICE
PROPERTY
S-237
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To cover the cost of filing a Hen with the County on a property that requires repairs and lo cover the cost or
removing that lien when the property is in escrow after the repairs have been completed through escrow.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND CC tST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$167*-Standard Service (10 Business Days)
$447*-Expedited Service (3 Business Days)
$0.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
$207.73 TOTAL COST:
$(207.73) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
300 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
so
$62,319
$(62,319)
0.00%
Apt1128. 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
ASCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SUBSTD.RECORDATION PLCMNT & REMOVAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average ofTotal Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION :on UNITDME
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT COOE ENF.SUPVSR Standard Svc. 075
CO.COOE ENFORCMNT COOE .ENF OFCR 0 .75
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.50
CD·CODE ENFORCMNT CODE ENF.SUPVSR Expedited Svc. 2.00
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT COOE.ENF OFCR 2.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00
TOTALS 5.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-237
TOTAL UNITS
300
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$94.81 250 $23,703
$CI7.7tl 250 $16,940
$182.57 $40,643
$252.82 50 $12,641
$180.70 50 $9,035
$433.52 $21,676
$207.73 $62,319
Aprft28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE ReFERENCE NO.
VACANT PROPERTY MONITORING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-CODE ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
S~239
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
PROPERTY
To regrster a property as vacant so that the Sheriff can enforce trespassing laws to protect the property and so that
the City can insure that the property Is property maintained.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 10D'IIo
$35*-ReglstraUon
$112• -Inspection
$0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
$142.37 TOTAL COST:
$(142.37) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
60 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$0
$8,542
$(8,542)
0.00%
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
VACANT PROPERTY MONITORING
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION J:1U. UNnDME
CO·PLANN!NG SECRETARY Prop,Regfltratlon 0 .17
CO~ODE ENFORCMNT COOE.ENF OFCR 0 .17
TYPE SUBTOTAL U4
CO~ODE ENFORCMNT CODE ENF.SUPVSR lnspec:lion 0.50
CO~DE ENFORCMNT CODE.ENF OFCR 0 .50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1 .00
TOTALS 1.34
REFERENCE NO.
S-231
TOTAL UNITS
60
UNIT COST AHN, UNII& TOTAL CQST
$18.81 60 $1,117
$15.38 80 $922 1
I
$33.97 s2,o3a 1
I
$83.21 60 I
$3,793 I
$45.18 80 $2.711
$101.39 $6,503
S14U7 $8,542
Aprll28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PARKING DISTRICT OPERATIONS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PARKING FAC.
DESCRIPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARKING SPACE
SERVICE RECIJitENT
S·240
To operate and maintain public par1<ing lots wtthin a two-block area around the intersection of Temple City
Boulevard and Las Tunas Drive.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
ft,....,., ... UE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: S383.8t TOTAL COST: $178,151
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(363.19) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(178,851)
TOTAL UNITS: 486 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Aprii2B.2011
SERVICE
PARKING DISTRICT OPERATIONS
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
PEPARJMENT POSITION TYPE UNITDME
CO.PARKJNG FAC. MTC.LEAD WORKER 0.85
CD·PARKING FAC. MAJNT .WORKER 3.35
CD-PARKING FAC. OVERTIME 0 .30
CO.PAAKING FAC. Utllkles 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL. 4.50
TOTALS 4 .50
REFERENCE NO.
5-240
TOTAL UNITS
486
UNIT COST NfN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$86.01 486 $41,801
$232.93 488 $113,204
$14.09 488 $6,848
$30.88 488 $14,998
$363.11 $176,151
$363.19 $176,151
April28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-PARKS MAINT.
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNJT OF SERVICE
RESERVATION
SERVICE REC1PJENT
To take a reservation for a picnic shelter and post the reservation at the shelter.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND CC 1ST ~nYP4AI~nN
UNIT REVENUE : $0 .00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: S28A9 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): S(21A9) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 250 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$29*
S-301
$0
$7,123
$(7,123)
0.00%
Apltl 28, 2011
SERVICE
PICNIC SHELTER RESERVAT10N
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CI1Y, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unil Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEURIMENT POSITION ~ UN!IDME
P&R·PARKS.MTCIFAC . PRKS & REC. COORD 0 .08
P&R·PARKS-MTCIFAC. PARKS MTC WORKERS 0.17
P&R·PARKS·MTCIFAC. REC. ST AFF.PT 0.25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
R'UERENCE NO.
$.301
TOTAL UNITS
250
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$8.41 250 $2,103
$1414 250 $3,535
$5.94 250 $1.485
$28.49 $7,123
$28A9 $7,123
Apri128. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE R£FERENCE NO.
RECREATION: TEENS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-RECREATION
OESCRIPnON Of SERVICE
UNIT Of SERVICE
PARTICIPANTS
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To operate various programs ror teens including the teen dances (2) and their Spring Fling.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Various fees -See Brochure
(Revenue includes $550 from fundraisers)
REVENUE AND CC ST COMP.6.RISON
UNrT REVENUE: $27.78 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $182.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(154.22) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 945 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
S-331
$26,250
$171,990
$(145,740)
15.26%
The City needs to balance fee increases with the marketplace and how this service Impacts the quality of life In the
community and helps with Juvenile diversion.
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
RECREATION : TEENS
NOTE
CrTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DI!PARJMI!NT PO SIDON Dn UNIT11ME
P&R-RECR.JH.SVCS PRKS & REC . COORD 0.43
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS REC. STAFF-PT 2.87
P&R-RECR.JH.SVCS PrognlmM&O 0.00
P&R..COMMUNITY CTR . REC. STAFF-PT 0.19
P&R..COMMUNITY CTR . Share Bldg Ann.Repl 0 .00
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR. Cuilodlal Share 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.30
TOTALS 3.30
REFERENCE NO.
5-331
TOTAL UNITS
945
UNIT COST &NN . UNITS TOTAL COST
$48.96 945 $46.267
$111.78 &45 $105,642
$15.83 945 $14,958
$2.57 945 $2.·429
$1.87 945 $1,787
$0.98 945 $11211
$182.00 $171,110
$182.00 $171,990
Ap/1128,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR201D-2011
SERVICE ReFERENCE NO.
RECREATION: PLAYGROUND
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-RECREA TION
DESCRIP110N OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To operate an after school and Summer playground program including various excursions.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Various rees -See Brochure
(Revenue Includes $3,250 from fiJndraisers.)
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGOESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OP: 100%
$96.73
$324.88
$(228.25)
1,760
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-334
$170,250
$571,965
$(~1,715)
29.77%
The City needs to balance fee increases with the marketplace and how this service impacts the quality of life in the
community and helps 'Nith juvenile diversion.
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
RECREAnoN:PLAYGROUND
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMeNT POSmON TYPE UNIT TIME
P&R-RECR.IH.SVCS PRKS & REC. COORD 0 .32
P&R-RECRJH .SVCS REC . STAFF-PT 8.53
P&R-RECR./H.SVCS Proan-n MAO 0.00
TYPe SUBTOTAL 11.811
TOTALS &M
REFERENCE NO.
5-334
TOTAL UNITS
1,760
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$36.79 1.760 $84 ,750
$273.13 1.760 1480,709
S15.06 1,760 $26,506
$324.98 $571,965
$324.98 $571,165
ApliJ 28 , 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVIC! REFERENCE NO.
RECREAllON:CLASSES
PRIMARY DI!PARTIIENT
P&R-RECREATION
DESCRIPTION Of SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
SERVICE RECIPI!NT
To operate adult and youth special interest classes mostly by contract Instructors.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Various class fees -see brochure
Instructor receives 70% of the class fee except for little Stars which is run by recreation staff
RegistraUon Fee -$5 (not included in the 70% class fee shared with instructors)
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COM ....... .,. ...... ,
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY}:
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$72.54
$95.68
$(23.14)
2,250
TOTAL REVENUE :
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY}:
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
Registration & Facnities Fee-$15 (not included in the 70% class fee shared with instructors)
S-337
$163,225
$215,280
$(52,055)
75.82%
Aprll 28. 2011
SERVICE
RECREATION: CLASSES
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION IlU UNITTIME
P&R-RECR.JH.SVCS REC. STAFF·PT 0.20
P&R-RECR .IH .SVCS PrugramM&O 0.00
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR. REC. STAFF-PT 1.45
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR. CuaiDclal Share 0.00
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR Share Bldg .Ann.Repl. 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.85
TOTALS 1.65
REFERENCE NO.
S-337
TOTALUN11S
2,250
I
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST !
$8.19 2.250 $18,428
S-48.57 2 ,250 $1114,783
S19.40 2 ,250 $43,850
$7.412 2.250 $16,885
$14.10 2,250 $31,725
$95.68 $215,280
$t5.611 $215,280
Aplil28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
RECREATION: SENIORS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R~RECREA TION
DESCRJPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
To operate a seniors program that Includes excursions.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Various fees -See Brochure
Prop. A reimbursement
SERVICE RECIPIENT
...... -.. ,111::: AND C( ,ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $47.27 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $%22.55 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): 5(175.28) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 754 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$15 -Registration & Transportation Charge
S-342
$35,645
$167,103
$(132,158)
21.24%
Apltl28. 2011
SERVICE
RECREATION: SENIORS
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION nn UNIT TIME
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS COMM.SVCS.SPECLST. 1.08
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS PfotpmM&O 0.00
P&R.COMMUNITY CTR. REC. STAFF-PT 0.96
P&R-COMMUNITV CTR. CusiOdllll Shant 0 .00
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR. sn&. Bldg .Ann.Repl. 0.00
P&R-PUBLIC TRANS . Transpcwt.Cosla 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.04
TOTALS 2.04
RE~RENCE NO.
S-342
TOTAL UNITS
754
UNIT COST ANN . UNITS TOTAL COST
$118.55 754 $87,878
$ .. 7.04 7S4 $35.486
$12.87 7S4 $9,704
$4.112 754 $3,710
$1t35 754 $7,050
$31.112 754 $23,992
$22.2.55 $167,103
$222.55 $167,803
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE
RECREATION: YOUTH SPORTS
REFERENCE NO.
8-346
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R~RECREATION
DESCRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To operate a youth sports program Including basketbatt, footban and soccer.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Various fees -See Brochure
(Revenue incfudes $5,200 from fundraisers.)
REVENUE MD CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE : $63.94 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $231.04 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(167.10) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1,350 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$88,325
$311,904
$(225,579)
27.88%
The City needs to balance fee Increases with !he marketplace and how this service Impacts the quality of life in the
community and helps with juvenile diversion.
Aprtl28,2011
SERVICE
RECREA'nON : YOUTH SPORTS
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Aver111ge of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS!DON I:!f( UN!TDME
P&R-RECRJH .SVCS PRKS & REC . COORD 0 .<48
P&R·RECR JH.SVCS REC . STAFF.PT 3 .48
P&R·RECRJH.SVCS ?rogramM&O 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.SI6
TOTAI..S 3.96
REFERENCE NO.
S.348
TOTAL UNITS
1,350
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
SS4 .82 1,350 $74,007
$145.49 1 .350 $196,412
$30.73 1,350 $41 ,488
$231.~ S111,BIM
$231.0( $311,9M
Aprii 2B , 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
RECREATION: DAY CAMP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-RECREA TION
DESCRIP110N OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
To operate a Winter and Spring Day Camp program.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$100 ·Winter Camp
$50 -Spring Camp
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND CC•ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $87.50 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $806.50 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): ${718.00) TOTAL PRORT (SUBstDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 80 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100'1'
S-349
$7,000
$64,520
$(57,520)
10.85%
The City needs to balance fee Increases with the marketplace and how this service Impacts the quality of life in the
community and helps with juvenile diversion.
April 28. 2011
SERVICE
RECREATION: DAY CAMP
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Unii.S
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNITDME
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS PRKS & REC . COORD 4.07
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS REC. STAFF-PT 5.80
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS Program M&O 0.00
P&R..COMMUN!IY CTR. REC. STAFF-PT 2.27
P&R-COMMUN!IY CTR. Share Bldg.Ann.Rep(. 0.00
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR. CulltDdlal Shate 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 12.1J
TOTALS 12.13
REFERENCE NO.
5-349
TOTAL UNITS
80
UMT COST ANN· UNITS TOTAl, COST
$462.70 80 $37,016
$2-42.38 80 $19,389
$37.50 80 $3,000
S30.32 80 $2,428
$22.03 80 $1 ,762
$11.59 80 $927
$801.50 S&4,52U
$806.50 SIW,520
April28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SPECIAL EVENTS: CAMELLIA FESTIVAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R~RECREA TION
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
NA
To organize and support the annual camellia Festival.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
---· UE AND CC ~ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $41,821 .00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(41,121.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
This service Is included for information only.
S-351
$0
$41,821
$(41,111)
0.00%
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERVICE
SPECIAL EVENTS: CAMELLIA FESTIVAL
NOliE
· Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION :I:YU UNIIDME
P&R-RECRJH.SVCS PRKS l REC. COORD 81.27
P&R·RECR/H.SVCS REC. STAFF·PT 253.78 .
P&R·RECRJH.SVCS Program M&O 0 .00
SHERIFF OPERATIONS Sheriff Cosb 0 .00
CD-CODE ENFORCMNT OVERTIME 29.95
C[).PARKING ADMIN. PARKING CTRL OFCR 7 Hrs 012 13.9o4
TYPE SUBTOTAl. 3711.92
TOTALS 3711.112
REFERENCE NO.
S-351
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST !NN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$9,247.71 1 $9.248
$10,607.17 1 $10,607
$1,700.00 1 $1,700
$18,277.00 1 s1a.2n
$1,169.85 1 $1,170
$81898 1 S819
$41,820.71 ~1,821
$41,821.01t $41,821
April 28, 201 1
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVIC!
SPECIAL EVENTS: LIGHTS ON
REFERENCE NO.
s-.355
PRIMARY DI!PARTMENT
P&R-RECREATION
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SI!.RVIC!
NA
To organize and support the annual Ughts On holiday festival.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND CCIST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: $44,5&4.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(44,564.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
This servloe is Included for information only.
$0
$44,564
${44,564)
0.00%
Aprtl28, 2011
SERVICE
SPECIAL EVENTS: UGHTS ON
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSinON mi UNITTIMI!
P&R·RECR.JH.SVCS PRKS & REC. COORD 81.27
P&R-RECR./H.SVCS REC. STAFF-PT 158.08
P&R-RECR./H.SVCS Program M&O 0 .00
SHERIFF OPERATIONS Sheriff Cosla 0.00
CO-COOE ENFORCMNT OVERTIME 9.98
C[).PARJ<ING ADMIN. PARKING CTRL OFCR 5Hnl0f2 9.98
P&R-TREES & PKWVS TREE TRIMMER UghiS In Trees 130.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 389.31
TOTAL$ 389.31
REFI!RENCE NO.
$-355
TOTAl UNITS
1
UNIT COST AHN. UNITS IOJAl COST
$9,2-47.71 1 $9.248
$6,607.74 1 $6,608
$17,100.00 1 $17,100
$3.1170 .00 1 $3,1170
$389.82 1 $390
$586.33 1 $588
$6,962.80 1 $8,963
~.564.40 $44,564
$44,564.00 $44,564
Aprll28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SI!RVICE
SPECIAL EVENTS: SUMMER CONCERTS
REFERENCE NO.
5-358
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-RECREATION
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNrT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECfPIENT
NA
To organize and support lhe Summer concert in lhe par1( program.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND CC fST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE :
UNIT COST: $32,554.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(32,554.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED fEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
This service Is induded for information only.
$0
$32,554
$(32,554)
0.00%
Apr1128. 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAiL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010..2011
SPECIAL EVENTS: SUMMER CONCERTS
NO're
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
PEPARDIENT POSITlON nu UNIT TIME
P&R·RECRJH.SVCS PRKS & REC. COORD 81.27
P&R·RECRJH.SVCS REC. STAFF·PT 22.88
P&R·RECRJH.SVCS Program M&O 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 104.15
TOTALS 104.15
REFERENCE NO.
S·358
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$8,247.71 1 $9,248
$958.38 1 $956
$22,350.00 1 $22,350
$32,5$4.09 $32,554
$32,5$4.00 $32,5$4
AprO 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SPECIAL EVENTS: OTHER
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-RECREA TION
DE9CRIPnON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
NA
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-360
To organize and support various other special events such as Camp-A-Palooza, Dining Under the Stars, Harvest
Hoedown, Movies in the Park, Independence Day Celebration, Fan Jubilee and Car Show, and HaUoween.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
Various admission and booth rees.
U~ AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $8,150.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $8,150
UNIT COST: $61,819.00 TOTAL COST: $69,619
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(61,461..00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(61,469)
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 11.71%
SUGGESTED F.EE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
This service is Included for Information only.
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
SPECIAL EVENTS: OTHER
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
PEPAR!MENT POSITION rtU UNITJJME
P&R·RECR.JH .SVCS PRKS & REC . COORD 81 .27
P&R-RECR.JH.SVCS REC . STAFF-PI 734.24
P&R -RECR.JH.SVCS Program M&O 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 115.51
TOTALS 815.51
REFERENCE NO.
S·360
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS JOTAL COST
$11,247.71 1 $9,2~8
$30,691.23 1 $30,691
129.880.00 1 $29,880
$411,611.94 $69,619
$69,619.00 $61,619
Aprll28,2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201~2011
SERVICE
COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM RENTAL
REFERENCE NO.
5-370
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
P&R-PARKS MTC/FAC
DESCRIPT10N OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RENTAL
To process a request to rent a room In the Community Center.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
Various-See Department
Note: Only about 20% of renters pay because of C«y policy.
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND CC 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$8.33
$61.20
$(51.17)
1,200
City should explore changes In policy and rates.
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$10,000
$11,840
$(71,840)
12.22%
A,ri128,2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM RENTAL
NOT!.
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT PO SinON r!fli UNITTlME
P&R-COMMUNITY CTR. REC . STAFF-PI 2.42
PAR-COMMUNITY CTR . Shant Bldg .Ann .Repl. 0.00
P&R·COMMUNITY CTR . CuslodU.I Share 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.42
TOTALS 2.42
REFERENCE NO,
S-370
TOTAL UNITS
1,200
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TQIAb COST
$32.34 1 ,200 $38,808
$23.50 1,200 $28.200
$12.36 1.200 $1<4.832
$18.20 $81,140
$61.20 $81,140
.
Aplll28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
SERVICE
GENERAL FUND SVCS TO THE UD
REFERENCE NO.
s-.i10
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
VARIOUS
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNrT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
NA
This service represents the cost from the City's Cost Allocation Plan of the various departments' costs to support
the landscaping & Lighting District.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Current charges to District:
$1,800 -Traffic Signal Maintenance
$4,500 -Street Ughtlng
$5,500 -Trees and Parkways
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
..,.,._...,UE AND CCIST COMPARISON
$11,800.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
$184,289.00 TOTAL COST:
$(172.489.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
1 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FO!t COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Suggested charges to District
$9,536-Traffic Signal Maintenance
$32,780-Street Lighting
$141,953 ·Trees and Parkways
$11,800
$114,269
S(1n,489)
8.40%
April28. 2011
SERVICE
GENERAL FUND SVCS TO THE LLD
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAJL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARJMENI POSmON DU UNIT TIME
GEN.FUND SVCS TO LL· Adm+F inanda! Svcs 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL G.OO
TOTALS o.oo
REFERENCE NO.
5-410
TOTAL UNITS
1
UNIT COST AHN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$184,269.00 1 $1&4,269
$184,2&9.00 $184,261
$184,269.00 $184,269
Aptil28. 2011
SERVICE
LL.D-LIGHTING OPERATIONS
NO'TE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSinON Ilf:( UNITTlME
CD-TRAF.SIG .MTC. TIS Mtc + ElK. 0.00
CD-TRAF.SIG.MTC. Admin. Services 0.00
CD-STREET LIGHTING SECRETARY 0.01
CD-STREET LIGHTING Street Llghlklg 0 .00
CD-STREET LIGHTING Adr'*'.Setvlces 0,00
1YPE SUBTOTAL 0.01
TOTALS 0.01
REFERENCe NO.
S-411
TOTAL. UNITS
10,082
UNIT COST ANN · UNITS TOTAL COST
$11 ,31 10,082 $11 ... 027
$0.95 10,082 $9,578
S<U8 10,082 $-4,838
$32.24 10,082 $326,0.. ..
$3.25 10,082 $32,767
$48.23 $481,255
$48.23 $486,255
Aprft28. 2011
ClTY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
LLD-LANDSCAPING SERVICES
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
VARIOUS
DESCRJP110N OF SERVICE
! UNIT Of SERVICE
I PARCEL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-413
This service recaps the revenue rrom landscaping assessments that are collected for parkway trae maintenance
and other landscaping.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$315,000-Assessment Fees. This represents approximately $31 per parcel per year or about $2.60 per parcel per
month.
RE"v'ENUE AND cc ~sT --··-" a•soN
UNIT REVENUE ; S31.U TOTAL REVENUE : $315,000
UNIT COST: $55.33 TOTAL COST: $557,137
UNIT PROFIT ~SUBSIDYt: $(24.09) TOTAL PROFIT tSUBStDY): $(242,837)
TOTAL UNITS: 10,082 PCT. COST RECOveRY: 56A7%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Current landscaping costs are approximately $55 per parcel per year or about $4.60 per parcel per month.
Voters should be given the option of either increasing the assessment or decreasing the level of service. One option
to decrease cost would be to make residential street parkway tree trfmlng the responsibility of the property owner.
Aprfl211, 2011
SERVICE
LlD~LANOSCAPING SERVICES
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DI!PARJ¥ENJ POSIDON :J:IU. UNITDME
P&R-TREES & PKWYS DIR.OF PARKS & REC 0.02
P&R-TREES & PKWYS TREE TRIMMER 0.31
P&R·TREES & PI<WYS TREE TRMR LEAD WKR 0.16
P&R·TREES & PKWYS OVERTIME 0.01
P&R-TREES & PKWYS Admln .Sertlc:es 0.00
P&R·TREES & PKWYS Trees & Lnd.seping 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL o.so
TOTALS 0.50
REFERENCE NO.
~13
TOTAL UNITS
10,082
UNIT COST AHN. UNaS WAL COST
$2.01 10,082 $20,265
$111.56 10,082 1168,858
$9.83 10.082 $99,108
$0.35 10,082 $3,52»
$14.08 10,082 $141,855
$12.50 10,082 $128,025
$55.33 $557,137
$55.33 $557,837
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORkSHEET
FISCAL. YEAR 2010..2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
STREET SWEEPING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PW-STREET CLEANING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
S-422
UNrr OP SI!RVIa SERVICE RECIPIENT
CUSTOMER-MONTH
To collect refuse that was not picked up by the refuse franchisee . The cost of this service is subsidized by Gas Tax
revenues which should be used for street maintenance.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
None
.. __ ,
IIC, AND cc 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $0
UNIT COST: $0.92 TOTAL COST: $139,921
UNIT PROFrT (SUBSIDY): $(0.92) TOTALPROFrr(SU~D~: $(139,921)
TOTAL UNrTS: 152,088 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
92¢ per month additional on the refuse bill
April28, 2011
SERVICE
STREET SWEEPING
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010~2011
Unil Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS!DON m.g UNITDME
CD-SOLID WASTE MGM Solid Waste 0.00
CO-STREET ClEANING SI.Sweeplng Contr. 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAl o.oo
TOTALS 0.00
.
REFERENCE NO.
5-422
TOTAL UNITS
152,088
UNIT COST ANN. UNIT& TOTAL COST
$0,09 152,088 $13,888
S0.83 152,088 $126.233
$0.92 $138,921
$0.92 $1311,8.21
Ap(fJ 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SPECIAL CURB PAINTING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CD-PKG.ENFORCEMENT
DESCRIPTlON OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-451
To restrict parking by painting a curb at lhe request of a business. May include the installation of a sign . Includes
annually renewing the curb painting.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
SO • Review Request (#25)
$0 • Initial Set-Up and Removal (#25)
$0 -Annual Renewal (#25)
UNIT REVENUE :
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUOOESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$198*-Review Request
I IE AND COST COMPARISON
$0 .00 TOTAL REVENUE :
$164.58 TOTAL COST:
$(164.58) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
75 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$209* -Initial Set-Up and Removal plus Actual Cost of Slgnage & Installation
$104*-Annual Renewal
$0
$12,342
$(12,342)
0.00%
Apltl28,2011
SERVICE
SPECIAL CURB PAINTING
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSIDON nn UNIT TIME
CD-PARKING ADMIN. PUB.SAFETY OFCR lnl1ial Review 1.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.50
CO-PARKING FAC. MTC.LEAD WORKER Setup & Removel 2.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.00
CO-PARKING FAC . MTC.LEAD WORKER Annual Rehlh 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00
TOTALS 4.50
REFERENCE NO.
5-451
TOTAL UNitS
75
UNIT COST AHN. UNITS JOIAL COST
$189.90 25 $4,748
$189.90 $(,748
$202.52 25 $5,083
$202.52 $5,083
$101.26 25 S2.532
$101.26 $2,532
S1&U6 $12,342
Apr11 26. 2011
SERVICE
AGENDA SUBSCRIPTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIP110N OF SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
REFERENCE NO.
5·703
UNIT OF SERVICE
SUBSCRIPTION
SERVICE RECIPtENT
To provide a copy of an agenda upon request.
CURRENTP!!STRUCTURE
$60
REVENUEANDCCISTCOMPAR~ON
UNIT REVENUE: so.oo TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $0.00 TOTAL. COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): so.oo TOTALPROFIT(SUB~Y):
TOTAL UNITS: 0 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Staff recommends deleting this service as it is no longer provided.
so
so
so
0.00%
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
AGENDA SUBSCRJPTION
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
pEPAAJMENT POS!DON :r!U UNITllME
0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
REFERENCE NO.
S·703
TOTAL UNITS
0
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAl, COST
$0.00 0 so
$0.00 so
$0.00 $0
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
FILMING PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMEHT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIPT10N OF SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
AEA!RI!NC! NO.
UNJT OF SERV1CE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-705
To process a request lo perform commercial filming within the City. This requires evaluation of the timing , parking,
noise, street closure, pub~c safety and other cons iderations in order to mitigate the impact on the general
community.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$145-Commercial (#3)
$0-Student (#3)
---· IUE AND CC ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$168"-Commercial
$0 ·Student
$72.50 TOTAL REVENUE:
$162.67 TOTAL COST:
$(90.17) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
6 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$435
$976
$(S.1)
4U7%
April 28, 2011
SERVICE
ALMING PERMIT
NOTE
CITY Of TEMPLE CfTY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POS!TlON ~ UNIIDME
COUNCIL SUPPORT DEPUlY CITY CLK 2.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.00
TOTALS 2.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-705
TOTAL UNITS
6
UNIT COST ANN, UNITS TOJAL COST
$102.70 8 $876
$182.70 $876
$162.87 $176
April 28, 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
FIREWORKS STAND REVIEW
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL SUPPORT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
STAND
SERVICE RECIPIENT
To review the request of 8 non-profit group to operate 8 firewortc.s stand within the City.
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
$49
.. ~, ..... 'UE AND C( 1ST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $49.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $94.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(~5.00) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 12 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVI!RY OP: 100%
S-710
$1,128
$(540)
52.13%
Aprfl28.2011
SERVICE
FIREWORKS STAND REVIEW
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Unlts
DEPAftJMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME
COUNCIL SUPPORT CITY CLERK 0.33
COUNCIL SUPPORT DEPUTY CITY CLK 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.13
TOTALS 0.83
REFERENCE NO.
6~710
TOTALUNrr&
12
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
153.30 12 $840
$40.88 12 $488
$93.98 $1,t21
$94.00 $1,121
Aprl 211,2011
SERVICE
BINGO REGULAnON
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
REFERENCE NO.
5-712
r-------------------·--~----~------·------------.-~~---------------------1
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL SUPPORT
Dt;SCRIPTION Of SERVICE
UNIT Of SERVICE
LOCATION
To annually review a request to operate bingo within the City
CURRENTFEESTRUCTURE
$50 annuaUy
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNrT REVENUE: $50 .00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNIT COST: $40.50 TOTAL. COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $9.50 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$42• -Annually
$100
$81
$19
123.46%
April28, 2011
SERVICE
BINGO REGULATION
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
I
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units I
DEPARTMENT eosmoN :r£fl UNIIDME
COUNCIL SUPPORT DEPUTY CITY CLK 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
REFERENCE NO.
5-712
TOTAL UNITS
2
UNIT COST ANN, UNITS !CTAl, CQST
540.68 2 SB1
~.68 $11
$40.50 $81
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
STREET BANNER
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPL£ CITY, CAUFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 201 0·2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT PO SIDON ~ UNIIDME
COUNCIL SUPPORT CITY CLERK 0 .08
COUNCIL SUPPORT DEPUTY CITY CLK 0 .17
TYPE SUBTOTAl 0.25
P&R-TREES & PKWYS TREE TRIMMER ln&teii!Remove ~.DO
lYPE SUBTOTAL 4 .00
TOTALS 4.25
REFERENCE NO.
S-714
TOTAL UNITS
15
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
112.92 15 $194
$13.83 15 $207
$26.75 $401
$21.4.24 1 $21.4
$214.2A $214
$41.00 1615
April28 , 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
PHOTOCOPY/REPRODUCTION CHARGE
REfERENCE NO.
$-716
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
CllYCLERK PAGE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
To duplicate a page at the request of a customer.
CURRENT FEE STRUCnJRE
50¢ -1st Page
15¢ -Each Additional Page
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE: $0.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
UNrrCOST: $0.00 TOTAL COST:
UNIT PROAT (SUBSIDY): $0.00 TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS: 0 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUC.GESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100"'
50¢-1st P age
15¢-Each Additional Page
$0
$0
0.00%
Aprll28, 2011
SERVICE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010·2011
PHOTOCOPY/REPRODUCTION CHARGE
NOTE
· Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT pOS!DQN :rtf§. UNIT TIME
D.DO
TYPE SUBTOTAL o.oo
TOTALS 0 .00
REFERENCE NO.
S-718
TOTAL. UNITS
0
UNIT COST ANN . UNITS IQIAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
April 28. 2011
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011
SERVICE REFEAENCE NO.
RETURNED CHECK CHARGE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
S-725
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPiENT
CHECK
To process a check that has been received for a City service but returned by the bank for insufficient funds.
CURRENT FE! STRUCTURE
$10
REVENUEANDCOSTCOMP~SON
UNIT REVENUE: $10.00 TOTAL REVENUE: $500
UNIT COST: $20.38 TOTAL COST: $1,019
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(10.38) TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): $(519)
TOTAL UNITS: 50 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 49.07~
SUGGESTED FEE fOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$9• plus the bank charge (currently $12•)
AprD 28, 2011
SERVICE
RETURNED CHECK CHARGE
NOTE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR 2010.2011
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARJMEN! POS!DON nu UNITT1ME
ACCOUNTING ACCOUHTANT 0 .08
ACCOUNTING Bank Charge 0 .00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.011
TOTALS O.ltl
REFERENCE NO.
S-725
TOTAL UNITS
50
UNrr COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$8.37 50 $4111
$12.00 50 $600
$20.37 $1,1»19
$20.31 $1,011
Aprtl28, 2011
3. Business Premise Signage
A total of signs shall be posted within 2' feet of each customer entrance and exit of the
building and parking lot area. Each sign shall be in English, Spanish, and Mandarin.
Signs shall be posted in a conspicuous place within the parking lot or parking area.
Each sign shall measure at a minimum 18" inches in width and 24" inches in height with block
lettering not less than X" inch in width and 2" inches in height.
Each sign shall state, at a minimum, as follows:
REMOVAL OF SHOPPING OR LAUNDRY CARTS FROM THE PREMISES IS PROHIBITED BY
STATE AND MUNICIPAL LAW. (B&P §22435.2; T.C.M.C. §5013.)
4. Mandatory Cart Retrieval Service
This requirement must be satisfied through a contract with a retrieval service company.
The Cart Retrieval Company is ______ _
The Local contact number is. _______ _
A copy of the retrieval service contract is included and made part of this retrieval plan.
(Note: confidential financial information may be redacted .]
A) Retrieval personnel shall maintain a letter of authorization to retrieve shopping carts
available during retrieval activities and produced upon request by any City enforcement
personnel. Said letter shall be provided by the establishment.
B) Vehicles used to retrieve shopping carts shall display a sign that clearly identifies the cart
retrieval service company.
C) Shopping or laundry carts which have been illegally removed from the store premises
shall be retrieved with 24 hours.
5. Containment Methods
Indicate loss prevention measures employed to prevent cart removal from premises:
A} Electronic cart disabling devices
B) Bollards or other permanent physical devices
C) Courtesy clerks to accompany customers and return carts
D) Security deposit for customer use of cart
D
D
D
D
6. Employee training
A description of an employee training program that shall be implemented by the shopping or
laundry cart owner and conducted at least once a year to educate new and existing employees on
the cart containment and retrieval plan.
Please describe the employee training program:
Application Checklist
The following pages have been submitted to the City of Temple City:
Required N/A
0 0 General Information (page 4)
D 0 Site Plan & Route Map (page 5)
D 0 Parking Plan (page 6)
D D (ADA) Awareness (page 7)
D D Security Information (page 8)
D D Marketing I Advertising (page 8)
D 0 Entertainment and Related Activities (page 9-1 0) (If Applicable)
D D Alcohol (page 11)
0 D Food Concession or Preparation (page 1 I)
D D Restrooms (page 12)
D D Waste Management (page 13)
D D Insurance (page 14)
D 0 Hold Harmless Agreement (page 15)
D D City Department Review & Approval (page 16)
D D Business Vendor License Attachments
D 0 Medical Evacuation Plan Attachment
Rev. 6/27112 Page 2 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
I, , on behalf of (the organization I represent), certify
that all foregoing pages in this Special Event Application have been completed. I attest that the information
contained herein is accurate, to the best of my knowledge and belief. I attest that I have read all the rules ,
regulations, and guidelines specified herein and that which is included in this Special Event Application.
I, acting on behalf of , (the organization I represent), am authorized to commit
that organization to agree to abide by the rules, regulations, and guidelines specified herein, and I will accept
all responsibilities for any damage to City Property and/or facilities, any payments for municipal services
and/or resources as they have been outlined and as they may be utilized by me and the organization whom 1
am representing and the patrons who will be served by this Special Event.
Event Title: Event Date(s): _____ Event Time(s): _____ _
Please Print
Name of Applicant: ----....,...,-~~-----------------------
Please Print
Title:
Please Print
Organization Name: ---------,---------------------------
Please Print
Signature: -----------------------Date: -----------
Rev. 6127/12 Page 3 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
Site Plan & Route Map
A drawing of your event site plan/route map must be submitted and include, but is not limited to:
o An overview of the event venue, including the names of all streets and moving routes of any kind.
Indicate the direction of travel and all street or lane closures.
o The provisions for a minimum of twenty-foot (20') emergency access lanes throughout the event venue.
o The location of all first aid facilities.
o The location of all searchlights.
o The location of all stages, bleachers, grandstands, canopies, tents , portable toilets, booths, cooking areas,
trash containers, and dumpsters, and other temporary structures .
o Location of generator(s) with source of grounding and/ or source of electricity.
o Identification of all handicapped accessible areas that meet standards, pedestrian access, and requested
street closures.
Once the City receives an adequate site plan, if necessary, the City Engineer will provide an appropriate
traffic mitigation plan for the proposed event with the following details:
o Traffic Control Plan (TCP)
• For each sign include the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) sign number, sign
size, sign description, and its location on the T CP.
• Show size, height, and location of all channelizing devices, warning lights , flag trees, portable
barriers, etc. on the TCP. All devices must meet standards specified by MUTCD .
• Example: Cones no smaller than 700 mm (28 in.) and no farther apart than 12 .2 m (40ft.), include
the length of channeling tapers.
• Consult the Community Development Department at (626) 285-2171 for any TCP questions .
o Traffic Signal Operation and Equipment
• Include location of all traffic signals.
• If special signal timing is required in the TCP, specify ALL changes and their effects.
• Consult the Community Development Department at (626) 285-2171 for any signal questions.
o Pedestrian Safety
• Be sure pedestrians have a safe route to walk and/or are protected throughout the entire traffic
control area before submittal of the TCP for review.
• Show all pedestrian entry and exit paths on the TCP.
o Parking Restrictions
• The applicant must post City of Temple City "No Parking" signs 24 hours prior to the event.
• Contact person for sign information : Community Development Department (626) 285-2171 .
o Other event components not listed above.
Rev . 6f27112 Page 5 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
)
Traffic Control Site Plan I Parking Plan
};> The Site Plan and Route Map is not a substitute to the Traffic Control Plan requirements outlined in the
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) in the MUTCD California Supplement. Please refer
to this manual as needed in the development ofTCPs; http ://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov and
http ://www.dot.ca .gov/hg /traffo ps/s ientech /mutcd s upp/supplement.htm .
};> The City Engineer requires approval of all TCPs before any TCP can be implemented.
};> Should City staff at the event find potential hazards towards traffic and/or pedestrian safety, they can require
the applicant to modify the TCP.
I Rev. 6/27112 Page 6 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Awareness
DEFINITIONS
• The tenn accessible shall mean ADA compliant.
GENERAL
• Concern should be given to the accessibility of your event's location.
• An event layout map with all elements (such as parking, portable toilets, ramps, seating, accessible paths of travel, etc.) is required
with this application.
• All printed material for an event is to include the request for accommodation notice with the international symbol for accessibility, a
conlact name, and the contact's phone number.
• Requests for accommodation may include material in an alternate format, an interpreter, or assistive listening devices.
BARRIERS
• Concern should be given to elevation changes of more than !!.'' vertical or W' beveled. This classifies as a barrier and requires a
temporary ramp.
• All cords, wires, hoses, etc., which are located within a path of travel must be ramped or placed within a cord cover.
PATHS OF TRAVEL
• An alternate path of travel is required when the public right-of-way is obstructed.
• When an alternate path of travel is provided, signage designating the alternate path of travel is required.
• An alternate path of travel must be provided whenever the existing pedestrian access route in a public right-of-way is blocked by
temporary conditions.
• Where possible, the alternate path of travel shall be parallel to the disrupted pedestrian access route, and on the same side of the street.
• An alternate path of travel shall have no protrusions up to a height of 80", including scaffolding and scaffolding braces. Where the
alternate path of travel is adjacent to potentially hazardous conditions, the path must be protected with a barricade.
PARKING
• If parking is provided for an event, accessible parking is required.
•If no parking is provided for an event, an accessible passenger loading and unloading zone is required.
• Accessible parking, passenger loading. and unloading zones are required to be identified using the international symbol for
accessibility.
• Signs with the international symbol for accessibility are to be mounted at a minimum of 60" from the finished floor or the ground.
SALES OR SERVICE COUNTERS
• If sales or service counters are provided for your event, the height must be no more than 36" from the finished floor or the ground, and
the width must be at least 36'' wide.
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
• An accessible route is required from the accessible parking, and from the passenger loading and unloading zone to the event entrance.
• An accessible route is required within the event.
• An accessible route must be a minimum of36" in width.
• Accessible routes must be identified with the international symbol for accessibility, including directional arrows, a minimum of60"
from the finished floor or the ground.
• Temporary ramps that do not exceed 8.33% grade may be required to provide an accessible route.
SEATING
• If seating is provided, accessible seating and companion seating are required.
·Accessible seating and companion seating areas must be identified using the international symbol for accessibility, placed at a
minimum height of 60" above the finished floor or the ground.
PORT ABLE TOILETS
•If portable toilets are provided, they must be accessible and located on a level area not to exceed a 2% cross-slope in any direction.
• The total numbers of portable toilets that are being provided for the event detennines the required number of accessible portable toilets
This number is 10% of the total, but in no event less than one for each location. r fa single unit is placed, it must be accessible. The
placement of single units will increase the number of accessible portable toilets required for your event.
• An accessible route to each portable toilet is required.
• Accessible portable toilets must be identified with the international symbol of accessibility.
Rev. 6/271!2 Page 7 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
Security Information
Have you made arrangements for security?
J f yes, what form of security will you be using?
(Please check all that apply)
r Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department
.J Yes
L Licensed & bonded professional security company
I Other: ----------------------
If using a licensed security company, please complete the following:
L No
Name of Company:-------------------------Address:-----------------
City : State: ____ _ Zip: __ _
Daytime Telephone: Evening: ------------------
Fax: Pager I Cell: --------------------
Private Patrol Operators License Number: -----------------
License to carry firearms: L Yes _j No
Marketing I Advertising
Will this event be advertised or promoted? J Yes [No
If yes, please explain: ----------------------------------------------
Will there be media coverage at the event? .J Yes LNO
If yes, please explain:------------------------------
Will signs, banners, or searchlights be utilized as a source of advertisement? JYes C No
Ify~.~~~9~~n : _______________________________________ _
Note: Generally, temporary off-site signs, such as banners, A-frames, or other signage within the public right
of way, are not permitted. (See City ofTemple City Municipal Code Section {9326 (B) (5)}, or contact the City
of Temple City Community Development Department at (626) 285-2171 for specific information on signage.)
Rev. 6/27112 Page 8 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
Entertainment and Related Activities
See City ofTemple City Municipal Code Sections {4130-4133}.
Is there any entertainment features related to your event? L Yes _j No
If yes, complete the following or provide an attachment that lists all bands I performers, type of music, time of
sound check, and performance schedule.
o Number of stages _____ _
Stage # 1 size notated: Height: ___ Depth: ____ Width: ___ _
Stage # 2 size notated : Height: ___ Depth : ____ Width: ____ _
o Number of performing groups: _____ _
Please List Performer name(s) and type(s) of Entertainment:
Will dressing room areas be provided for the entertainment? L Yes .J N o
Size of dressing room area and type:
Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? I Yes J No
If yes , Start time : _____ _ Finish time : -----
Will amplification be used? [Yes J No
If yes , Start time: _____ _ Finish time : -----
Pl ease describe the sound equipment that will be used for the event: --------------
If using a licensed sound company , please complete the following:
Name of Company: Address :---------------
Ci~: ____________________ ___
Daytime Telephone: -----------
Fax: ----------------------------
State: ____ _ Zip:--------
Evening: ______________ __
Pager I Cell:-------------
Rev 6/27112 Page 9 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
Entertainment and Related Activities (Continued)
Will Generators as a power source be used? .J Yes L No
If yes , what type:--------How Many : ___ _
If using a licensed Power company, please complete the following:
Name of Company: Address:--------------
City: State: __ _ Zip :--------
Daytime Telephone:----------
Fax: --------------------
Evening :--------------
Pager I Cell:------------
Rev. 6/27/12 Page 10 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
Alcohol
City Municipal Co de Sections {4400~4406}
Does your event involve the use of alcoholic beverages? I Yes
Please, check all that apply :
o Free I host alcohol
o Alcohol sales
o Host and sale alcohol
o Beer
o Beer and Wine
o Beer, Wine and Distilled alcohol
Will you be hiring a licensed bartender I caterer to serve the alcoholic beverages?
If yes, please provide the following :
Name of Licensed Bartender I Caterer:
Alcoholic Beverage Control License Number: _______ _
Fax:
I No
_j Yes
Telephone Number:----------------------
L No
Address: __________________________________________ ___
City:-------------------State: ____ Zip: ___ _
Food Concession or Preparation
Will your event include food concessions, booths, and I or food preparation areas? I Yes INo
lfyes, Contact the following :
o Health Department at ( 66I) 254-9560 a minimum of 30 days prior to the event, and describe how the
food will be served and I or prepared:
o Los Angeles County Fire Department at (626) 287 ~9521 a minimum of 30 days prior to the event to
obtain a Food Booth Operations Permit.
Please provide copies of the Health Department Event Sponsor Permit and the Fire Department approved Event
Permit to the City of Temple City Community Development Department.
How many food vendor(s) will be at your event? ____ _
Please attach a food vendor(s) list that includes the following :
• Type of food and preparation required .
• Business Name with Address , City, State and Zip Code.
Rev. 6/27112 Page II of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
)
Restrooms
The Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DHS) recommends I chemical or portable toilet
for every 175 women and !_chemical or portable toilet for every 250 men. At least I chemical or portable
toilet facility must be ADA accessible (The total numbers of portable toilets that are being provided for the
event determines the required number of accessible portable toilets. This number is I 0% of the total, but in
no event less than one ADA accessible toilet for each location). This figure is based upon the maximum
number of attendees at your event during peak time. For the current requirements please contact DHS at
(661) 254-9560.
Are you planning to provide rest rooms at the event?
If yes, please identify the following:
LYes .J No
o Total number of port -a-toilets: ------------
o Total number of ADA accessible rest rooms: ------------
Setup
Pickup
Date:
Date:
-----
-----
Time: ----------
Time: --------
PortableToii~CompanyName : _____________________________________ ~
Telephone Number:-------------
Address:
Fax : -------------
-----------------------------------------------
City:----------------------State: ____ Zip: ___ _
Rev. 6/2 7112 Page 12 of 16 Applicant Initials ___ _
Waste Management
SANITATION AND RECYCL YING
The event must be planned and organized to have a minimum impact on the environment. As an event
organizer, you must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and
immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition .
California State law requires each City to divert 50% of solid waste from landfill. Athens Services manages
the City of Temple City 's solid waste programs . You can help by planning recycling strategies for the
waste generated at your event by calling the Public Works Division at (626) 285-2171
Exclusive franchise agreements require applicants to use Athens Services for garbage removal.
Please contact them (626) 336-3636 at least 30 days in advance to arrange for service at the event.
Will there be dumpsters? L Yes .J No
If yes , please identify the following:
o Total number of dumpsters I size:------------
Delivery Date: ____ _ Time: -------
Pickup Date: -----Time: -------
PLACEMENT OF DUMPSTERS
Please explain your plan for clean-up and waste removal during and after the event:
STORM WATER PROTECTION
Local and State regulations prohibit the discharge of wash water, cleaning water, trash and debris to the
Storm Drain System . Please contact the City's Community Development Department for specific infonnation
and assistance with your event planning at (626) 285-2171.
Rev 6127112 Page l3 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
'
Insurance
As a condition of use of City of Temple City facilities or City Programs, your organization must provide, at your sole expense, each
of the following items indicated:
Proof of insurance comprised of certificates of insurance and original endorsements of comprehensive general liability
insurance written by one or more responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in California. This coverage must:
I. Name the City of Temple City, its officials, officers, directors, employees, agents and volunteers as additionally
insured against liability for injury to persons, damage to property and for the death of a person or persons arising or resulting
from any act or omission on the part of your organization, its agents or employees.
2. Include liability coverage for claims made by participants in your event/program. You are advised that any and all exclusions
pertaining to athletic or recreational events/programs must be disclosed in the endorsement and failure to do so will not
necessarily insulate your organization from individual liability for claims made as a result of the use of the facilities and your
event/program .
3. Be PRIMARY insurance with respect to the additionally insured named above . Any other insurance available to the City of
Temple City, its officials, officers, directors, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess and noncontributing.
4. The comprehensive general liability insurance policy limits o f such insurance shall not be less than $2,000,000 per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Any deduct ible or self-insured retention must be identified and approved by the City. In the event the deductible is deemed to
be too great, the City may require you to have your insurer eliminate the deductible or reduce it.
5. You must satisfy these requirements by furnishing the City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements affecting
the required coverage. The certificates and endorsements are to be on ISO-approved forms . The City will not accept a
Certificate of Insurance alone as proof of insurance coverage. The original endorsement must specifically list the following:
"The City of Temple City, its officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, and volunteers are
additionally insured against liability for injury to persons, damage to property and for the death of a
person or persons arising or resulting from any act or omission on the part of your organization, its agents
or employees .
This insurance is primary with respect to the additionally insured. Any other insurance available to the
City of Temple City, its officials, officers, directors, employees , agents, and volunteers shall be excess and
noncontributing."
You are strongly urged to show this Notice of Conditions (including the precise wording of these requirements) to your
insurance agent or broker. Doing so will help you, your agent, and the City process the proper documents in a timely
manner.
If you are not able to obtain this insurance, the City may be able to provide you with an insurance quote through Diversified Risk
Insuran ce Brokers , for the event coverage.
You must provide the City with the endorsement 14 days prior to the start of your event/program. Each
endorsement shall be subject to approval by the City of Temple City as to form and as to insurance
company.
Please sign and return this original Notice of Conditions to indicate your receipt and understanding of each of the conditions
listed above.
Signature of Designated Official ________________ Dated. ___________ _
Title ______________________________________ _
Organization's Name
Rev . 6127112 Page 14 of 16 Applicant Initials __ _
A I r ACHMENT "F"
0 -2 !1 Sq. Ft. Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 0.3 1 $ 150.84 $ 35.00 $ 185.84 $ lOS .OQ
26 -100 Sq. Ft. Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 0.3 1 $ 150.84 $ 35.00 $ 185.84 s 180.00
101-500 Sq. Ft. Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspect•on 0.5 1.5 $ 232.26 $ 35.00 $ 267.26 $ 250.00
> 500 Sq. Ft. Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 0 0.01 $ 1.15 $ 35.00 $ 36.15 $ 1.50 _11er 5tl Ft.
Grading Plan Check Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 $ llO.OO Per hour
Grading Permits Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 $ lZO.OO Per hour
Verification of Easement Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1.5 $ 180.00 $ 35.00 $ 215.00 $ us>oo
Public Way Vacation Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 20 $2,400.00 $ 35.00 $2,435.00 $2,500.00
Tract Map Processing Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 45 $5,400.00 $ 35.00 $5,435.00 $ 5,.500 .00 Per Tract
Covenants and Agreements Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 Per hour
Hourly Engineering Review Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 s 120.00 Per hour
Hourly Public Works Inspection Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1 $ 114.84 $ 114.84 $ 115.00 Per hour
Street Pavement Repair/Reconstruction Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 0.5 0.5 $ 117.42 $ 35.00 $ 152.42 s 150.00 pe r 50 LF
Temporary Discharge Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 1.5 $ 180.0 0 $ 35.00 $ 215.00 $ 215.00 per ocrur.am:e
Trenchmg Includes plan reView, administrative fees & inspection 0.5 1 $ 174.84 $ 35.00 $ 209.84 $ 215.00 per 50 Sq. Ft.
Utility Services Cuts Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspection 0 .3 1 $ 150.84 $ 35.0 0 $ 185.84 $ 180.00 per b lock
Encroachment Permits equired for Encroachment on or Interference with Public Property ' ! ~
Canopy Maintenance Includes administrative fees & inspection 0.3 0.5 0.5 $ 144.05 $ 35.00 $ 179.05 $ 180.00 per cu:.tl.lr ance
Construction Barricade Maintenance Includes administrative fees & inspection 0 .5 o.s 0.5 $ 168.05 $ 35.00 $ 203.05 $ 200.00 per cccurance
pl us Athens
Construction Bin Placement Includes administrative fees & inspection 0.16 0.5 $ 69.83 $ 35.00 $ 104.83 $ 48.00 pick up fees
Crane Operations Includes administrative fees & inspection 1 1 $ 234.84 $ 35.00 $ 269.84 $ 245.00 per da y
Filming-Commercial Includes administrative fee s & inspection 0 .3 0.3 0.5 $ 131.28 $ 35.00 $ 166.28 $ 168.00 ~day
Loading/Unloading of Materials Includes administrative fees & inspe ction 0 .16 0 .5 $ 69.83 $ 35.00 $ 104.83 $ 95.00 per da y
per newsrack
News Rack Installation Includes administrative fees & i nspe ction 0.3 0.5 $ 93 .42 $ 35 .00 $ 128.42 $ 140.00 per yea r
Outdoor Sidewalk Dining Includes administrative fees & inspection 0.5 0 .5 $ 117.42 s 35.00 $ 152.42 $ 150.00 per year
Standing/Parking of Construction
Equipment Includes administrative fees & inspection 0.25 1 $ 131.26 $ 35.00 $ 166.26 s 185.00 per day
Standing/Parking of Trucks Includes administrative fees & i nspection 0 .25 1 $ 131.26 $ 35.00 $ 166.26 $ 1.85.00 per day
Temporary Storage Facilities Includes administrative fees & inspection 0.3 0.5 $ 93.42 $ 35.00 $ U8.42 s 110.00 per day
En croachments Plan Review Includes plan rev iew, administrative f ees & Inspection 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 $ 120.00 Pe r ho ur
Transportation Permits t routing of Trucks in excess of 6,000 pounds, or in excess of 8 feet 6 inches in width i
Single Trip Includes plan revi ew , administrative fees & lnspt!d:lOrl 0.25 $ 30.00 $ 35.00 $ 65 .00 $ 16.00
Annual Trip Includes plan review, administrative fees & inspectio n ' 0.5 s 60.00 $ 35.00 $ 95.00 j $ 90.00