HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD13699 BILL NO,
SPONSORED BYCOUNCILMAN KLINDT
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, CHANGING, AMENDING, AND
MODIFYING THE ZONING MAP OF THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, BY
REZONING 1.42 ACRES FROM RS-2 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RD MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 BROOKDALE DRIVE, LOCATED
IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST, JEFFERSON CITY, COLE COUNTY,
MISSOURI AND ENDORSING AN AMENDMENT ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGE.
WHEREAS, IT APPEARS THAT THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE ZONING CODE
RELATING TO ZONING HAVE IN ALL MATTERS BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
WHEREAS, THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE ZONING MAP AND THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE
WOULD NECESSITATE A CHANGE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MAP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON,
MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following described real estate is rezoned from RS-2 Single Family
Residential to RD ModiUrn Density Residential Attached:
Tract B of a Survey of record in Book A, page 533, Cole County Recorder's Office,
being a part of Private Survey No. 2701, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County,
Missouri, more particularly described as follows: From the northeasterly corner of Lot
12 of LUebbert-Rothove Subdivision Section 1, as per plat of record in Plat Book 7,
page 61,Cole County Recorder's Office;thence N56.01'00"W, along the northerly line,
of said Lot 12, 221.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N56'01'00"W along
the northerly line of said Lot 12 and the northerly line of Lot 38 of Luobbort-Flothove
Subdivision Section 2, as per plat of record in Plat Book 8, page 11 , Cole County
Recorder's Office, 194.87 feet to the northwesterly corner of said Lot 38, said cornet
also being a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Brookdale Drive; thence
N08.59'00"E, along the easterly right-of-way line of Brookdale Drive, 160.95 feet;
thence northeasterly, along the easterly right-of-way line of Brookdale Drive, on a
curve to the right having a radius of 263.51 feet, an arc distance, of 105.60 fact, (the
chord of said curve being N20*27'48"E, 104.89 feet) to the southwesterly corner of a
tract described by deed of record in Book 398, page 83, Cole County Recorder's
Office: thence S57050'00"E, along the Southerly line of said tract described by deed of
record in Book 398, page 83, the Southerly line of a tract described by deed of record
in Book 448, page 189, Cole County Recorder's Office, and the Southerly line of a tract
described by deed of record in Book 244, pace 708, Colo County Recorder's Office,
279.41 feet to the southeasterly corner of said tract described by deed of record in
Book 244,page 708;thence S321 0'00"W, 256.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1.42 acres
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from ,'. nd after its passage and
approval.
SECTION 3. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Development Plan Map Is hereby
endorsed to reflect the changes for the area described in Section 1 from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential Attached Land Use .
l•�� ' Approved: /�D
Passed
Pres in ficer �~ r +�
ATT T: AP E O M:
- v
City Clerh7 City Counselor
Li#,fir of Jefferson
Comp. Plan Amendment & Rezoning
115 Brookdale Drive
IA15"" v
Depnrfmrnt of Comnnlnity U,vrllnprtpnf
Rif ick E,Sullivan,J.E.,Diroclor
320 East McCarty Slmol
JoJlo n11u 65 Of
(5763 464 10 V,O I T MAP
rax(573)63:•6457
Lu
1 w
�• t.IJ� s'
• . ,.- L
i ��1-"� ,� del f'..5 '''�,,.,.�•
Ji Imo ,
'` 77
w CIS ; 4 Y ST...
•'ti �'` �1 ,�,ti`'lam " ` lL .,''"j a"�'r J
� r •Ir�4 M' i�l � '41`''1,,/'
' '�dll S'T", ,�' -r- I�:F{r S T'A'CT IIyIG�
�IVI ,��r. a'�.._ CAF;, k
'!''`�i}}�'�L'f.�, �I l'J•• 55' '•'ter
i
w' n
1 fir' ,i.--''•�' ltd , ' -'•?:�., 'plfCi�CE1ti9l::lh•a1 r04, ,
SJJ ZE'T'T(L1
1 u1l
SC TT
AREA OF PROPOSAL
City of Jefferson
Comp. Plan Amendment & Rezoning
115 Brookdale Drive
r�•�` Tel w
o
`^ 1 u
Y"i l
1925.• i
Department of Community Development
Patrick E. Sullivan,P.E.,DJroctor
320 East McCarty Stroat
Jntterson City, )634-r; 65 JDt L OC�4 TION MAP
Phony(;i73)G34.6�J 10
Fax(673)634-6457
CURRENT ZONING: RS-2, Single-Family Residential
L
r / r
ARE OF PP POSE: W
Cq P EHF_NSIV PL
AM NDMENT AND ZO G
a i
cr
M
�'_
_ O �\
} � m
a \
� C-0
.__ ul
- AREA OF PROPOSAL
..........
APPLICATION FORT.ZONING...ORDINANCE_A.MEN.D.ME.NI'S.
Cily of ,10f(!mon - Phrminq Divi!Joii
r i.. . t
f)f!p,)rf(1w11f of C.ommimily D(!V0opfTv!11f F c
','fwF!f
fdj:,,�olw G,)101 ".
6.110 1 o (),"IA
The (vider-;1(pled horohypt"1111mvi the 11,11minq 'md Co�/ 1"f1hu
WFSOLiri, for 01(.� 111101)(11M,111 to [tit" /omm; Cod(!
i-1 Zonino 'I ext Anwiidmui if (01 /1)?" h0cw"of illf;w1i compl0f?
Article mio SwAton Affoctod
Description ofpmpw,,(!d luxf wiwndtiwtif
4y7/oning Mop Am(,n(Niwf,.f of k(!A f*::f,jti�.)
III(" tindef:;iollod fhoov"111-r!, of fit' follmvjw; rc,d (legal dc:;cripfion
must be printed below or attached as an exhibit)
PrO()Orty Addres!,;: IS �3rotnk.Jale- f DFI-AAD f/A ,I
Regal/Properly
Who lwtilion to w,,(m(, f1w ;ibovi w,d from !*1tw, )f
lezomml wq(w!;t i!; to
to d i,d ric I I i w pi i i I io ,;f! of I I i i,
I ne
x A.,
ALL OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE REZONED MUST SIGN THE APPLICATION, AND ALL SIGNATURE
MUST BE NOTARIZED, 11: ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES ARE NEEDED, PLEASE A-ITAGII SEPARATE SHEETS.
F'ropurty Owner 111 Namc of ptint) f,/oo(,v/y ov"not s1qf?,,)t1110
1-Irc)porty Om iur 82 Nofnu (ty,I)c, of*print) V)/upualk, Ov"llol
SUI)SCrIbed and sworn before me this day of in the yenr _.
Notevy 1"uhlic,
Address of Proporty 0wtwr it I /"j
7'-
Address of Propof ty 0:v(ior fl:?
Phone Numbcr(`:):
Applicant Inform�jtion (if diffcquril from pro,)c-rty ovxwr)
Name,
Address:
Phoric NUMbOr.. / .Y J
-
For City Use Only: Application Filing Fee c-)()O
Payment Ruc,cived:
c
--cash (Indicate Receipt 11-_ —.-Chock, (Copy, indic,-ito chock
tachnients:
I
Additional shae!,., Or dO(;LJ(11(,-f1I,'1(iOf1 AppIw1-mt,,[--)roj(!ct Information Sh(-!ot _.___-Location Mal)
0101 May 6,2002
FEB 0
TOM & NANCY SUTIMIT I'ltOM C'1'
ZONING MAP AME,N1)ME,N`1' CRI'1 ERIA
Section 35-7413
n. 'I'hc existing zoning was in error it the time clfadoption,
"There was no error in the zoning Wrap.
h. 'Hicre has been a chrllige in churnctcr in the circii site to installation ofpublic
11icilitics, other zone changcs, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or
development transitions,
Duplex and continued commercial development alone Bast McCarty .Street
support the change.
c. I'hcrc is a community aced liar the proposed rczoninr.
Duplex housing iu the area has high occuponc), rates and this is considered a
desirable location.
d!. 'I'lle proposed chtinbc is consistent with, and in 1'urihcrulcc of, tllc implementation
ol'the goals and policies cif the Comprehensive flan, clthcr adopted plans, and the
policies, it'ltents and rcduirements orthis Ordimnce and other City regulations rind
guidelines.
Yes.
e. "fhc proposed zoning is compatible with the zonins" and uses of property nearby.
Propertp to the and South is currently zoned RD,
f: Public and Community I11cilities, which nlay include, but ;Ire not limited to,
sanitary and Storm sc\vcl*s, water, electrical scrvicc, police rind lire protection,
schools, parks and recreation liicilitics, roads, lihraries, and solid waste collection
and disposal, arc avail iblc and adcduatc to scrvc uses authorized under the
proposed zoning.
The proposed chautie in land use idill have no measurable impact on public
facilities.
9. A tr.►fie impact am- ysis has been provided to indieute (lie potential 1n1 lb, .:l(_..i...4..�1,I11.mlI�y►N1'r►.vl i0lk 0 lt� . ...
new trips generated and provisions arc provided to mitig;
APPLICATION FOR .AMENDMENTS TO THE COMF?f2EF{ENSIVC:i?LrAN
F.
lily of ,leff(w�mi Pl;nanir)rl f)ivi:;ioIl r...
Wp.lrtnn!nf u( (;r)nu)nnuhy I h'vc lr)pnn nl r-f, r
i
fr'r1(f1
1 �1n��V 1��7 1) 1�.r,.t.(,•I ;,) I ,i• (�ri.',Ili. •i�l�,,')i ,.,.
i
T IC (111(1 till;);';, II; v ifi' y (-,0'.111(.11 c)f If 1, (.Ity Of .)t!fl(9f"OII,
MIs;..olln, for tilt! foil(r"%,Ith ,In�tIfHI M�r;'(�,j to 11))� i;Itv'�; (:r,nlfII�� I,-f1 ,iv� I',.,n r)1- f)t vi.�lu ill lt.n; f'LIn ! ;II it,i l! ,tr ti1:lf)
-) 'I oxt ✓ nwildn)enl xr.,Lip Ali;Onriliwnt
Applicytions for Map ramendmonts 4;11u11 inclildo ;) 11 .anon rn;)p ,and fr,vi ri of drr;.)il ri,(giiir(rci for r,ifc! pli'm roview w"
olrtlinod in Fxhihit I
All ,applications s,h;cll ,W;i, 1) ;a c^✓Ilicli r•tltt.fl;l. v-, otitlr;trrl in 35-14 A.4,
jf,rffer:;on Clly loni!lq Goiir!
a Whothcr there w,v w.Or u) Ih(!mqt in;ll ;,rf;)ptir)n n) Ihal Ihcc Pl;ntninrl;Illd L[)nlnr)
Colr)n r,$)oi, (;lllod 1n 1:IS,e rrltn arc(lunl 11wil ( Xr,llflq f:wt,; prnju( tinw.,fit ll( f n1 ,ih;at wof(! 'CWY.)fIabI
fc)ro'.;cr%);Ihlct to ekc;f n) 11w hit);ro
1). Whelhctrrwrrnt.; Pk in 1 1,1vrr)nv,)lid;)I(!dt1w Cornuni:;sion's
mgin;)I prcrnli ;es; ;tried hnrirrlcr'; m,rlt, unnn ;)!,III ildOption
C. WhcUmf Ihc! c.h;uuae I,, cunr,c;innl :vlth flit! rftr,llr,, ohlecllvcr.; ;)nrl pollclw, of the
d. Wl)ellwrevt"r)t.; "n ill(! onap 0I(.!fu,ivc: I'I;an;vloi)t)c)t) r)el/or
c:(.)Ildltlofl of Ihu ;uc ;) ';c) as to miikr Ihrr ;If)plrc::,Uun ;u;cc f,f;ihlc:.
e. WI)elhr)r lhct ch;anriu i,; ner.dr!ri to rfnprovu conr,e,ftrnr:y bolv✓c�en lilt! Cr)I;)f)rcrhnnf;ivc: I'lim ;Inc( other
,)dopted pl;Ins.
f. Whetlaer public;lml cm f;wIlltles,r,uc:h;I.I utilltic;;, ;,Itill,;):y and stOrrli(;c)wc!rs,woler, polies,and
fire protection, s(: fools, pxks ;md mcfo;)tional f;ac:ilitiot ', io;uf:;, Ilhr;aries, solid wasto collection and
disposial, itr)cl olher;; nre ndegll ile to serve developill nt for' Ihr: type wid scope :arcfuosted by the
propot,ed :,tine If ulilltws :arc; not ovaihhIc;, whelhef they r,;an ho exiencled reasonably.
cf. Whether them I,; an ;ufecfu;ate :;apply of l;alld ;av;lil;ihte in thu :;object m,(!o and the surrounding
c.onan it](lily to ;.u;con)naodata tho :onintl 'Intl comillor)ity nc,(!&;.
It. Whether there will benefits derived by Ihr) conun)uuty ur ;Inc,) by iho propm-'ed ch;�ntfe.
Amendment Requested by: __.711roporty Ov✓nc�r -1SkIff -1f'II'milillo a )cl Zonincl Con)n)ir siun
Name, (typed or printed) ;:irtnrrtrrn, ��
Applicant Information;
Property Owner N,,mw `(f' ��yr" t;i
.fir' f7�-•f_?./? OIt� -
Phone Nun)her(s) ' :,� f> >,!Yi 5 �,i' '� _� r' E?.l F. -------
Othor Applicant Inform it1on:
Name:
Addre:.;e,:
Phony, Number
For City Use Or)Iy.- Appl)e<a(iun f=llinrl F oo ,)00
Application Filifig Feu Recefvcrd.
_..._.....___.Cash (indicate ;tier If)1 ;I ) Cfax;k (r,u(',y; Indicate chock
Attachmonts:
M,Ip A)pile anUProject Information Sheat
ape 1 Of 1 May G,2202 .
R LC E I'
F E B
TOM &
BROOKI)AVA-4 DRIVE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Excerpt from Section 35-74 Legislative Approval - Development Permits
Ordinance No. 13361
a. wl)ctj)cl. Illerc was cl-rol. in the original Comprehensive Mall adoption ill
that the Planning and Z ►lling Commission flailecl to take illtO 1000L111t flIC11
existing 111cl.;, pro,jectiolls or trends diat wcre reasonably floresecable to
exist in the ILitill.c.
There was no error.
1). Whether CVClltS SUI)SCCILICIlt to the Coillpi-cliclisive Plan mioptioll have
invaliclatal the Coll-lillissioiCs original prenlises and finclings made upon
plan adoption.
Last A1cCar1j,Street is an arterial routing), carrying over 4,000 vehicle.v
Per&q. IVe believe singlefiunilt, residential use i►-ill continue to decline
in traffic and development increases.
C. Whether the cilange is consisicilt with the gO,11S, 0h.jCCtiVCS and J101iCiCS Of
the Plan.
The change would be considered appropriate and good
(I. WIlCtilCl- CVCl1tS SLINSCLILICIA 10 the Con 1pl-cilellsivc Plan adoption have
changed the C11,11-acter and/or condition of'the area so as to make the
application acceptable.
Thegroji,th of the East side as a retail area and commercial divria
support the chaiwe.
C. Wilctiler the clialloc is ileccic(I to improve collsismicv Fictweell the
Comprehensive P1,111 and other adopted plans.
Yes, due to the transitional nature of*East AkCaq),Streel as an arterial
roadiva.y.
FEB { 0 20'N
._1
f. %, hcthcr public and community laciiitics, such as utilities, sanitary and
stortll sewers, water, police and lire protection, schools, parks and
recreational lircilitics, roads. libraries, solici waste Collection anci disposal,
and others lu'c adequate: to serve development liar• the type; a11(1 s'copc
suggcsted by the prullclsc(I zone. If utilities are not available. whelhcr they
can he extended reasonably.
All fu blic and cnnmu nilyfbcilities are available and adequate.
g. Whether there is an a(leyuate supply ol'la►1(1 available in the subject area
and the surrounding community to accomnloclatc the zoning ;ln(I
C0111n11t111ty nce(Is.
The I.42 acres easilt, accommodates three (3) duplet lots.
h. Whetller there will be henetits derive(I by the community or• arc;r by the
proposc(1 zone.
hifrll development is lbe most henejiviul finunciulh,to the Land
use should compliment the next generation of Base side development.
r.
W" OM SIM
06
C 10
cu Jc
EL My
0
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission
Property Owners List
Case No, P04006 115 Brookdale Drive March 11, 2004
Cyril & Dolores Baurnhoer Elmer Boessen
208 I-laaf Drive 558 Senate Court, Apt. C
Jefferson City, MO 65101 Jefferson City, MO 65109
118 Brookdale Drive 2600 F. McCarty Street
Mary Eileen Bonnot Mary Borgmeyer
1911 Woodclift Drive 2100 Louis Circle, #B
Jefferson City, MO 651109 Jefferson City, MO 65101
124 Brookdale Drive 2616 E. McCarty Street
Arnold & Leda Edgar Daniel & Jacqueline f=orck
2610 E, McCarty Street 2628 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101 Jefferson City, MO 65101
2610 E. McCarty Street 2628 E. McCarty Street
Andrew George William & Veronica Johnson
1210 Duane Swift Parkway 2606 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65109 Jefferson City, MO 65101
127 Brookdale Drive 2606 E. McCarty Street
Michael & Julie Kever Terry & Billie Sue Lytton
4319 Tanner Bridge Road 1551 Eastview Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65101 Holts Summit, MO 65043
2522 E. McCarty Street 123 Brookdale Drive
Marion & Eulala Miller, Trustees Robert Rothove
1700 Overlook Drive 2401 Valli-l-li Road
Jefferson City, MO 6109 Norfolk, NE 68313
2620 E. McCarty Street 112 Brookdale Drive
Rudolph & Mary Jane Rothove Argus, Sr. & Martha Russell
209 Hidden Valley Lane 2614 E. McCarty Street
Westphalia, MO 65085 Jefferson City, MO 65,101
131 Brookdale Drive 2614 E. McCarty Street
Russell & Sherry Sadler Wayne Thoenen
201 Eastwood Drive 5112 Gesina Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65101 Jefferson City, MO 65101
201 Eastwood Drive 120 Brookdale Drive
Dorothy Vaught Irene Voss, 1"rustee
202 Eastwood Drive RR 1, Box 111A-1
Jefferson City, MO 65101 Bonnots Mill, MO 65016
202 Eastwood Drive 116 Brookdale Drive
108 Brookdale Drive
LL
C)
D
b
40-, 4-j
a L6 th
M z in
< CN to
0—", u
w E z
> 7 N CL
0 z
V) < (r
C) < 2 LL 01 �e
0 U) LU
E
0 w ui
z < 0 u >
0 m M
0 z to C) U) rl)
OXw C
z
LL
CO in
W 0 CY)
LL LU Ul - n m I —
C) m C) * IL (L IC5
u z u
C: N
C QJ
0 W m
u �l
0 E V) uj X
LO
LL O Li 0 ti
C"-4 Co a; 0 ri
co >
r 0 �o co
CL -i
L6 u E
(D 4) t- rj
o. z N V) V) Cl LL
OWA M
(14
NO o L)
C14 Cj
.�ck.-.. C:)
C) C4
O C14
in 0 "
CD --- -----
C3
B C:) N 0
04
C) N 0 Cl
C) Cp
CD 24,
Cni (14 C) in C>
G C) 04 CD 11 C',
(1) C14 C) C4 co a
C) -1) 'o
C) - C� CZ)
C'4 C) 0
m cu:,
C) C)
Cl
C3
C) 12) in 0 c C5 C-4
in 0 M C) C-4 N
4 C=) 0 in N Of CD in
C) O n h 04 0 Cl CD
04
Cl N C,4
CD CIA
=in
C3 C)
in
04
N7 rNJI�J�Q3Li�
CD it)
U, 7-
-77
ITANNiNC `TAF ItI?I'1)i2'I'
JEFFERSON ('iTY PLANNINC AN1) M),NINC (.'O1IMISSiON
40 INTarch 11, 2004
Cast- No. V04000 11S Brookd►tly Drive, ('c►mpl-chemive Phil Antcmintrnt and Retorting. Rc(lucats
HIM by Thomas and Naucy Suthoti', owners(('cnttal \Missouri 1'ruf,;,sronai Scrviccs,Consultant).
1,61-approval of thv folluwinl; itcn)s related 10 1. 1' ,roes loc:atcd Of 1 I Itruokclule Drive, lOcatcd in i); 11 01'
the Northwest Quarter of Scciion 22, 'township .1.1 North, Rill)1,;' J I \Vest, and Imm•t of Private Survey No,
2701, The purpose of the applications is to ,dloty li,t• the dcvclopnrc'nl of amulti-fiunily residential
subdivision.
A. M apantcndnrcntloilx,('ityuf.Icl'fcrson('on)(,r chcns ivcl'I,rnc )ill IidnL;Ihcclesignali()nfrom
holy i CIlSit1' RL-SidC11Iii'd land i jse to Rleciiun) f)easily I�rs►dential �1ltachecl l,nnd lJsc.
1t. Itczortilll; of I A2 acre~ 1'1'0111 IBS-2, Sinl lc I ;uuily KC!iidvIIlI ll to IM, Mel irurr l)rrr.vilt
!1 r.cirlrrrlinl.4lrurlrrd
nlificaticm
Hy Ie•.Itcr, Io ndj:tecnt and affected properly owliers wilhin 155 feet, :uui I7v properly sign poslurp, as
t'ccluircd by the± /,oninj, Ordinance.
(_ones�ondcnc�Received
Please see correspondence packet.
i.ocaIi oil/I slor
'1,1)c sIIhjccl ,►rea is located at 115 131-ookd;dc, some 1.10 CC et ';011th of t11 inte I'S cclior) ol•III•ookdnlc
Urivc with Bast McCarty Strect, •I'hc 1.42 acre tract is located on Tract If of a Itacl division that was
approved mill)inistralivcly by city staffin.f tit d,I'2003,which separated a l.IJ'l acct fillet with a sinl�le-fiuuily
residence fronting Fast McCarty Strect from the original 1.19 acre parcel,
•1•he subject !;it(" is Mari of a 1,531 acre -u•ca that was „nnexcd into the city on Deccu)hcr 31, 1968.
The subject nrca was included in a Iarge Mica 01'RS-2 zoning upon annexation into the city. Surrounding
properties along 13rookdnlc DI-ivC to the south wcrc rev.onc(l from RS-2 to RD in N-70, while the property,
directly across i;rookdalc I)rive was rezoned from RS-2 to RD in Juoc of I(Oo,
Land I Ise and%o",jjz
The subject site is currently cicsil:nalcd:rs I.ow Density IRc,,di'nt,;,l I.and l Jsc by the t 'ocnprche nsive
Plan Land Ilse Map and is zoned KS-2, Sillgle-I';nndy Residential. 'I 1)e :,itc is directly hUrdCIVd by RS- 2
zoning to the Borth, east,alld southeOt, while all land to the west and clircc by adjoining to ncc south is zoned
RD, Median) Dclisity Residential Attached. The iancl to the north ;u)d east of Ihc• suhjcet property is
designated as Low Density Rcsidcnlial Land tine h�' the ('or,)prch(.w Ive 1'1:,11 band Use 1iap. I.;nul to the
WC.St and south ufthc subject Site is cicsij.',na(ed as ^,icdiurrt I>cusity I.:urd I'sc by !Ire
C'oml)r'chc:nsive flan Land I lse
land R, the north, east and southeast ofthc subject site is currently rn re•;i(Icntial use,
While the Innd dircc•tly to the west south of*thc subject pr•.)perty is currently Ill nu,itr-f,uurlV residential Innd
Ilse.
('orient I'rc,�ns,il
The applicant proposes to amend the Con)prchrnsivc I'Inn I.nnd t )se Nlap by ch,u)ging the
dcsit'llatio n of the suhjcct site fron) I.ow Density RCSiclential i.;u)d Ilse to Mednun Density
Cues Nu, 1'114006 115 ilrooluhde Drive
i'lttnninL sttl(I brain � ('c►r�t�t�i„i�►)r__nlni'cli•,I 121111_J.__�.___�...__.._____.._ ._..,..�__�_..��'_�t.S�c�?
Residential-Attached Land t use, and also proposes to rei„oc the 1.•1_' UIV Iracl )•ronl 16-2, Silludc-Fanlik,
Resic.lcntial to RD, N-ta!iunl Residential Attached in order to support ;I Ihrce lot nlcdiunl density
residential ;ataciled development (tile original aucnda inadVCI'tcntly listed the I'Ciollilll�with a typol±rapulCal
C11,01, citing the rezoning to RD, Multiple-Faillily Residential. The ;Ipplic;utt has also filed a Subsequent
application to Subdivide the subject site 1111c► three' (3) lots so ;IS to he ZINC to collstruc.t three residential
duplexes upon the 1 . 12 acre lot ((',Ise No 1'0,1(11(1),
Proposal (A)C omprelleneive Plan 111up Amendnlerll
Considerations
I. '1'hc C'onlprchcnslve Phill shows the sill)jec�l al-ca ifick led in an area OF LOW DCIlSily RCSidcntial
land Use. Land inlnlcdialcly adjacent to the west and south is :shown as ,Medium Density
Residt:ntial-Attached Land (Ise,
2. The chaclge in land use (Icsiftrlatlon of lhC area is in keepinjt, With the};mend goals and objectives
01'the flan, and would improve consistency hetwccn tile. ('onlprellcnSivc Pkill and other aclolltcd
plans.
3. ('hanging the land use designi"Ition oCthe SIIhjccl area would allow the Comprehensive Plan band
Use Map to reflect current land uses and(Ievelo)nnCnt Ilattcl'n ol'thc land MIjat-enl to the subjCCt area.
4. Adequate public Caeilitics including hul not limited to water, electric, sanitary and storm scwcrs,
police and fire protection, dull roads are located in L lose proximity Mud are avoilublc to the subject
area.
5. Adequate land is available loo.the subject site to support Illive (3) IlVu-frinlil,v Ill' duplex. lots
6. The City ol'.1ei'lct'son ;Ind the Community would hcnclil from the proposed chalige in the laud Ilse
map by allowing for infill development of tilt- suhjcct property in a I miler that is similar to
adjoiniIll, land uses ol'tbc area.
I'ro local (If) Rezoning
Lolls ider"It i oils
I. The Coll1prehc11ske Plan shows the subject area Included Ill all area oF Low l)eilslly Residential
band Use. Land intlrlCdintely aclj;leent lu lilt- «est 'Intl sotnh is Shown as N'ledlunl Density
Residcntial-Attached Innd Ilse.
2. The effects of,trafi`ic generation, noi.e, and lighting u)lc,n adjacent properlie:s, or the impact upc,n
u,ristinf i►►li'astrue cure should he C0lISicicred, AS this rccluc;t is Cor all cxpallsiou ofa zoning district
directly adjoillilig the Subject site, disIvrate effects are not anticipalvd.
3. Adequate puhliC IilCililiCS including but uol HIM41M to water, :Icctric, sanitary and storm sewers,
police and lira protection, and roads arc located in close proximity and are available to the subject
arr;l.
4. The RD zoning district is compatible with the existing Zoning and land uses of the slu•roucldinR area
and is not anticipated to adversely affect the capacity orsnfety ul'thu strcut network ill the innllcdiate
vicinity,
71
Case No. 1104006 11.; Brookda1v Drive
-11,1,11, 2004
0 11()ICIllial ClIVIVIII)IM-111;1I ilhildCk,Id hind w 111,m'c,I III III,, P 1 (11 'n I I u 11(ll ;ml Wip'llcd;Illd iln v
7. '1 he Cit", of.)CHerskm illid 111C c()Iv-lII1jIIllY wiluld Iwilcht Crmn HI • I)IOI)ONC(I CIl;IIIPC- ill IhC 1,111d use
111,11)by it I Imv i I I 1.! 1`►1,i I I I'l I I(I 11l I l4dw S U I)I L'CI I)Ft)I)L'11%1 I I I'I I I I;I n I lcrlhi It rc I I cck I I I k.;I(I ,)i I I i I Ii!
land uses ofthe area.I, I It-1wvvCI-, gn-,'I I C I' I)(:jjL'j I I b L' (I I I\Td 1'1.()11 Ithe OW1 I LTS OCI)IC I;I I)(I rather
than the public.
S. Rezoning the property t(1 RD would allow fow tllc Same rallt,c of 1:111d uses permitted (m certain
properties in close proximity (() the Sllbljc• f site, includillj! the I\vo-A',-IIljllY residential land tiscs
identified in file rezoning application,
9. There is alladequille Supply of land in the SIIh.jcc-I ;Irca and area 1():1cce)IIIIIII-Idalt!tile
ZOIIill,1;,'Itld COMPIlIllity IICCdS.
10.
Additional Considerations play he f0illid in S/wIfl.-h-ca
Trnffic hw);icl Amilysis
As the proposed rezoning, is to a dis!rict Illat is similm ill use and Intensity Ill the c.xisliw", and
111111,0111)(litiv zoning;districts, a tratfic impact alliklysis is not liucklvd. Hw trnIVIC-gcIlevillion rail Is emillialcd
fur SilliFIC-fillilily dCtiICIICd ll(AlSillf,' tillil' MILI t\V(1 filillik'IL-SidClltii'd IVI)C' I0%VfIIlOLIS(-s. I I.Sillf."this Standard,
all estimate of,approximately 9.57 vehicle trip ends per sink Ic.-f',,wmk dwelling; 111111 po.-r wcckdoy iind 5.86
Vehicle trip ends pCI-rcsidCnIiII tNTC tO\VIIhOIJSC.S/d(II)ICXL!S is expk.,cled, I'lic:Ipplic,1111 has Stil)lllitic(l:l mill().
subdivision plat under Case No. P04010 that prop()scs Ilircc (3) 1()Is. I IsIlig, Ihc- Standards cited, !()I'll trafflic
Veneration would he expected to he approximately 29 vehicle It 11) '01RIS per week(Iny for three siiiPle-Ii-milly
lots and 15 vehicle trip ends per weekday Im- three, reSidt-n6id IOIS.
AlthOLIC,111 tl1CCStiI1WICd 1111tilbet-oftrip ends gC11cullcd by tlsL,.Is slightly higher
than the estimated IIuII1bcI-()CII-Ip.; 161-sillgIc C1,1111ily IISO, SI,'If •hCliCVCS this 11)(21-CiLl-C Will not liavciriy adverse
fillINICUS 1.11011 the SUI-1-01.111dillil StIV-421, Rr(wkdalc I)i-)\,c is classif-wd its I local strect the
S (W illfi-,lStRICIIII-C. I
SLIIJCCI arch and is built to a standard that should be IhIC tO OCC(111111-10(1:11C till-' llICTCiISC(I LISU that 1110)' he
generated frond it residential suh(livisioll ill the illinic(lialc ill-ca.
Illca:ic scc the L"Algillecring, Division Stal'I'l-cl-tol-I 161• I'11111ILT C0111111CIII :11 10 ll'ifflk lllll)aCI and
(IC%'Clol)lllcllt impact ()f,the proposed rezoning and C(II11I)I'CIICIISiVC 1)1;111 '1111CII(IML-111.
The proj)OSC(l 1111ClllhllCIII to the ('0111pl•cliclisivo: Pkill I.,Illd t'!;(: \hp would chans,c the !'alill Use
I•lap in a Ill"Ifiller that would I-CIICCt adjacent 1,111(i IISCS in OW ilIV;I Of IIIL' DI'01)(ISAI ;III(I 'WOUILl 110t CNIISC 1111y'
'IdVCI'SC C-fTCCtS t1l)(111 i'l(IjOilling kind or land uses ()I'tllC ill'Ca. Sll[)S(:(IIICIII CVCI!tS !0IIC(.! HIC uloption (41111
Comprellellsive III'lli t;pdatC in %IiII'Cj) Of l')')O IM •C 111MIC this ;-C(IIWSt ;ICC!TI1I;Ihic,
As dic. propost'd rezoning, is to I district that adjoills (lic sull1ccl Site and ifflow" for land use ()I'tl!C
same, no (10►11111(2111a1 CITCCtS 'II'C Zlllti(211)atCd. Tile I)I'01)('scd 1-cz(11111w oftlic will llilvc SkIll1c
hCHL-fit I'(WHIC Cil��by allowing I'm-ilifill dc-vo.-I(IpII1cIIl,and JJIC proposed(1111)IC.\ l-CSIdCIItUII IISC Will m-IM'ille
traffic lc%,cl.s that arc rcIatIVCIV HIC 1<1111C:IS thnsc of adjacent 1a11(1 ll.i(-S. RCIA)IIiIII-1 the subject IIIOI)Cl't�-would
also allow Ihc mvilels to make use ol'the subject property is it Idild LIS •thill 1)01'(ICI'\, the S1.11111CCI 'JIC NMI .111OW
for illfill devcI(q,11)(111 ill the ('11y.
Staff Position: Support
Plannin St;d'j has no 0hjC.CtI0lIS COlICCI-IIilI0 IIIC 1)1'01)oscd IcXollill, and ('01III)ITIMISM.- Phil)
amendment.
h ill GvIleral it 111,0"'I-All ion, V(Ilul lie I , 111slittlic 190!
j
PLANNING AND ,ZONING COMMISSION
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Case No. P04006
March 11, 2004
Sender Sender's Property Location How Date
Address Received Received
Arnold & Leda Edgar 2610 E. McCarty 115 Brookdale Dr. E-Mail 03/10/2004
Russell & Sherry Sadler 201 Eastwood 115 Brookdale Dry Fax 03/09/2004
Janice McMillan/Jeff0ty 1'o Lrdn,t:rlrinr(i�cloc,nu:.rlov
r '
03110/2004 1 1:10 AM cc;
r bcc; Arano Slrntmr:nlJnitc�rty
Scrhjc:rl Rw i.e.-rmrrnl Mooting of Cosa No. P04006D
Dear Mrs. Edgar,
Thank you for your comments. Your comments will he copied and distributed to the Planning and Zoning
Commission Immediately prior to the meeting on March 11. 'rho. Planning & Zoning Commission does
consider the impact of proposed zoning changes upon property vRluOs. In some rases existing land uses
in the area have as much if not more impact than that which has been proposed in the rezoning
application. The existing zoning and land uses along East McCarty are currently a mixture of one-family,
two-family, multiple family apartments and commercial. The zoning which has been proposed for the
Brookside property is "RD" which is a medium-density residenlial district that permits one- and two-family
dwellings. Rezoning the Brookside property to "RD"would make the zoning consistent along Brookside
Drive (also RD) and would not be incompatible with adjacent simile family uses, from ra land use
perspective.
The Commission will review and make recommendations on tho, application at their meeting on March 11;
then the application will be forwarded to the City Council for final Faction along with all correspondence
received. My office will advise you of the Council schedule by letler, but I anticipate the matter will be on
the Council agenda for their meetings of April 5 (introduction) and April 19 (public hearing and vole).
The City has has adopted building codes, property maintenance and environmental codes which are
enforced by the code enforcement section headed by Charles Lansford. For additional information
regarding the zoning application please feel free to contact Shannon Kiietherntes in the planning division.
Both individuals may be reached by phoning 634-6410.
Janice McMillen, AICP
Deputy Director, Planning & Transportation
Dept. of Community Development - City of Jefferson
Leda.Edgar @doc.mo.gov
Leda.Edgar@doc.mo.gov
(x�� 03/08/2004 12:09 PM 1'o cc
Subject Rezoning Mceling of C,tSo No. P0,1006
As a properly owner effected by this rase, we wish to express the following concerns,
1. We believe this rezoning will affect the value of our propety for future: resale of our home.
2. We are concerned about the quality of citizens this multi-family subdivsion will bring. We know this will
be ultimately the decision of the landlords, who we hope are responsible landlords.
3, We are concerned about tho landlords mcaintmining the facilitios to nn acceptable level. This is a
wall-kept nice neighborhood and wo would like to sna it kopt that way.
Really, we feel hopeless in expressing these concerns, If we had been financially able, we would have
bought the land just in order that it lay vacani.
Sincerely,
Arnold and Leda Edgar
2610 E McCarty
Jefferson City MO 65101
RE ICE ED
March 7, 2004 MAR " 9 2001
Is HPARWENT OF
COMMUNItY DEVELOPMENT
C)c:p:utmrnt ol'Cotnmunity lh:vrh�pmemtl'l;tm�inr Division
John CT. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty St.
,1eiTe:rson City, X40 65101
I
RE: Case No. 1104006 -- 115 Btcokdalc: Drive: ,- Rezoning
Sir/Madam:
Our property is the largest section on F'astmvood Drive. ('tlrrently it touches pan of the
duplex housing on Brookdale. 11 also touches the property in question.
We arc,opposed to this rezoning. All ready we experience trespassing traffic across our
property from the duplexes. We are KlYaid that this rezoning would increase this traffic .
Also, we believe that our property values will be affected ncgutively by allowing multi-
family dwelliiigs. 'Elie ponies in our neighborhoc)d are very well maintained wid we taku
pride in our homes and yards.
Sincerely,
Mr. & Mrs. Russell Sadler
201 Eastwood
Jefferson City, MO 65101