HomeMy Public PortalAboutSelect Board -- 2021-05-24 Minutes (3) vAAAAAAAppAAlilllll IIIIIIlIU//J�J// .: .
v0 IRE W S T
OQ D o*XDER Q9 F
si9 , I .. . 1 Office of:
_ �aQ �
Town of Brewster
I p N 2198 Main Street 1 I Select Board
or, Brewster, MA 02631 - 1898Town Administrator
It
Phone : (508) 896 -3701
'�///// FOO
RPOP
/J
J
J/ fa. 19. 110
MINUTES OF THE SELECT BOARD EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES
DATE : May 24, 2021
TIME : S : 4SPM
PLACE : Remote Teleconference
ALL PARTICIPANTS ARE PARTICIPATING REMOTELY : Chair Chaffee , Selectperson deRuyter,
Selectperson Bingham , Selectperson Chatelain, Selectperson Whitney, Town Administrator
Peter Lombardi , Assistant Town Administrator Susan Broderick, Chief Heath Eldredge, Paul
Hodnett-Town Counsel
Call to Order, Declaration of a Quorum , and Meeting Participation and Recording Statement
Chair Chaffee called the meeting to order at 5 : 55pm, announced all Select Board members
present and declared a quorum . Chair Chaffee read both the meeting participation statement
and recording statement .
Executive Session
Chair Chaffee stated that the Board would be going into executive session to discuss strategy with
respect to litigation when an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the government' s
litigating position ( Lanctot, et al v . Town of Brewster) , and to conduct strategy sessions in
preparation for negotiations with non - union personnel and to conduct contract negotiations
with non - union personnel (Town Administrator) and would be returning to open session to
complete the rest of the items .
Selectperson Bingham moved to go into Executive Session at 6 : 52pm . Selectperson Whitney
second . A roll call vote was taken . Selectperson deRuyter- yes, Selectperson Bingham -yes,
Selectperson Whitney-yes, Selectperson Chatelain -yes, Chair votes yes . The Board vote was 5 ,,,
yes, 0- No .
Each person stated : "There is no other person present or able to hear the discussion at this
remote location . "
To discuss strategy with respect to litigation when an open meeting may have a detrimental
effect on the government' s litigating position ( Lanctot, et al v . Town of Brewster)
Attorney Hodnett gave the background information on this case which began in the Spring
2017 . It is a two- count civil action that is pending in Superior court . It involves the nonpayment
of wages . The claim is brought by the plaintiffs , three police officers currently employed by
Brewster Police Department . The complaint by the officers is that they believe they should
have been paid at the lowest rate of a police officer while attending the Police Academy . This
complaint alleges that the three officers, when attending the academy where paid as cadets as
opposed to the entry level of a police officer . The argument is based upon on a Superior court
BoS 05 . 24 . 22 ( pm session ) www . brewster-ma . gov Page 1 of 3
DOC ID : deOb8f9df6b2e75902d9395bdl2e10bd820a74a3
���oa\��\uummnnuu/i
\\\\ �VLE W S /
0 o ° `°ERB9 � Town of Brewster Office of:
''
SX 2198 Main Street Select Board
_ 3ci a ° 9 =
$ (n =
° r. Brewster, MA 026314898 Town Administrator
Phone : (508) 896 -3701
/l// !/en0 1116;10
0 �
o
0\
case that Mr. Hodnett believes is not applicable . The Plaintiffs when hires, were hired as cadets
and signed an employment agreement . In the agreement they agreed to a specific wage and
agreed that they would not be paid as police officers or sworn in as police officers until they
graduated the police academy . The statute reads that the cadets will be paid at the rate to the
position in which they were appointed , in this case all three were appointed as police cadets .
The dispute in this case is what is the appropriate hourly rate of pay that they should have
received for the 12 weeks that they were being trained at the academy . During the time the
case has been pending, there has been agreement on all the underlying facts in the case, there
will be no trail . The damages that each individual is seeking is the difference between what
they were paid and the first level of a police officer, a total for all three of approximately
$ 9 , 500 .
Attorney Hodnett stated that the second complaint is nonpayment of wages statute , Under the
remedial action of the legislator of triple damages, there is a potential damage award by the
court in this case . Mr . Hodnett believes based upon the facts, the case that the plaintiffs are
relying on does not apply to this particular case . Again , they were not appointed as police
officers when they attended the police academy, and it is not required to be a police officer to
attend the police academy . Mr . Hodnett believes the Town has a strong case but cannot
predict what the court will do . Mr . Hodnett added that he expects the argument will be held
the third week of June at Barnstable Superior Court, adding that there is a 3 -year statute of
limitations .
Chief Eldredge left the meeting .
To conduct strategy sessions in preparation for negotiations with non - union personnel and to
conduct contract negotiations with non -union personnel (Town Administrator)
Selectperson deRuyter summarized the draft contract in the packet and noted no changes were
proposed as a result of past Select Board discussion . The proposed salary in the contract is
based on a similar analysis of surrounding communities, much like the Compensation and
Classification completed for positions within the Town . This is a 5 -year agreement, the net
effect is 4 additional years of Mr . Lombardi ' s employment .
Selectperson deRuyter moved to sign the Town Administrator' s contract dated July 1, 2021 and
runs through June 30, 2026 . Selectperson Bingham second . There was a roll call vote;
Selectperson deRuyter — Yes, Selectperson Bingham — Yes, Selectperson Whitney — yes,
Selectperson Chatelain — Yes, Chair Chaffee — Yes . The Board vote was, 5 -Yes, 0- No .
Selectperson Bingham moved to dissolve executive session at 7 : 16pm . Selectperson Whitney
second . There was a roll call vote, Selectperson deRuyter — Yes, Selectperson Bingham — Yes,
Selectperson Whitney — yes, Selectperson Chatelain — Yes, Chair Chaffee — Yes . The Board vote
was, 5 -Yes, 0 - No .
BoS 05 . 24 . 22 ( pm session ) www . brewster-ma . gov Page 2 of 3
DOC ID : deOb8f9df6b2e75902d9395bdl2e10bd820a74a3
I
I �\\\\1\llllllllllllfl((!!!!!!
\ 0\\ �4EWS �
, � ti�oEAsgF9 Town of Brewster office of :
F
O Q Fh /
2198 Main Street Select Board
Brewster, MA 02631 - 1898 Town Administrator
Phone : (508) 89611113701
Pee
Respectively Submitted by :
Erika Mawn
Approved : 11 / 15 / 2022 Signed : �� Virus
Date Kari Hoffmann, Select Board Clerk
Date Released : 2/27/2023
BoS 05 . 24 . 22 ( pm session ) www . brewster- ma . gov Page 3 of 3
DOC ID : deOb8f9df6b2e75902d9395bd12e10bd820a74a3