HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 2016-08-30 PLANNING COMMISSION - SPera City Of
LYNWOOD
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
(310) 603 -0220
PLANNING COMMISSION & PARKING & BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT BOARD (PBIDB)
SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday, August 30, 2016 — 6:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
LYNWOOD, CA 90262
PLANNING COMMISSION & PBIDB
Elizabeth Battle, Commissioner
Bill Younger, Commissioner
Alex Landeros, Commissioner
Kenneth West, Vice -Chair
Jorge Casanova, Chairperson
AGENDA
AUG 2 4 2016
CITY OF LYNWOOD
ITY CCLERK_S OF ICE
In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you are a disabled
person and need a disability related modification or accommodation to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (310) 603 -0220 ext 214 or Fax
(310) 223 -5121. Requests must be made as early as possible, and at least one full
business day before the start of the meeting. Staff reports or other materials related to
an item on this Agenda which are distributed to the Planning Commission less than 72
hours before this scheduled meeting shall be available for public inspection in the
Development, Compliance and Enforcement Department/Planning Division office
located at 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA 90262, during normal business hours.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA
3. ROLL CALL
1. Elizabeth Battle, Commissioner
2. Bill Younger, Commissioner
3. Alex Landeros, Commissioner
4. Kenneth West, Vice -Chair
5. Jorge Casanova, Chairperson
Planning Commission & Parking & Business Improvement District Board Agenda
August 30, 2016
Page 2 of 3
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Request to Approve the Minutes of the July 12th, 2016 regular meeting.
6. SWEARING IN OF SPEAKERS
(City Clerk or Designee)
7. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- Regarding Agenda Items Only
(With respect to speakers addressing items listed under the heading of public
hearing, you are asked to wait until the Chair formally opens the public
hearing and the item is called)
8. NON- AGENDA PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATION
(This time is reserved for members of the public to address the Planning
Commission relative to matters that are not on the agenda. No action may be
taken on non - agenda items unless authorized by law.)
9. PLANNING COMMISISON /PBIDB ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
(This section is designed for Commission Members to report on outside
meetings attended that pertain to the work of the Board.)
ELIZABETH BATTLE, COMMISSIONER
BILL YOUNGER, COMMISSIONER
ALEX LANDEROS, COMMISSIONER
KENNETH WEST, VICE CHAIR
JORGE CASANOVA, CHAIRPERSON
10. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
A. Request to consider Tentative Parcel Map 2016 -01 to subdivide one parcel's
air space to allow three (3) detached condominiums on property located at
3304 Cedar Avenue.
I. Open Public Hearing ( M S )
II. Staff Report Presentation
III. Public Testimony
IV. Discussion
V. Close Public Hearing
VI. Call for the question /vote ( M S )
01
Planning Commission & Parking & Business Improvement District Board Agenda
August 30, 2016
Page 3 of 3
B. Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan and Lynwood Transit Area
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
I. Open Public Hearing ( M S )
II. Staff Report Presentation
III. Public Testimony
IV. Discussion
V. Close Public Hearing
VI. Call for the question /vote ( M S )
11. OLD BUSINESS
None.
12. COMMISSION COMMENTS
13. DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS
14. ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular Meeting is scheduled for September 13, 2016.
3
LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
July 12, 2016
Item #1 -Call Meeting to Order
Vice Chair West called the meeting to order at 6:02 PM
Item #2- Flag Salute
Commissioner Battle led the flag salute.
Item #3- Roll Call of Commissioners
Planning Manager, Mike Poland called roll. Commissioner Battle, Commissioner Younger,
Commissioner Landeros, and Vice Chair West, were present. Chair Casanova was
absent.
Also present were Interim Director of Department of Development, Compliance &
Enforcement Services Erika Ramirez, Planning Manager Mike Poland, Senior Public
Works Manager Elias Saikaly, Office Assistant Marisol Medina, and City Attorney David
Olivas.
Item #4- Certification of Agenda Posting
Chair Casanova asked if the Agenda had been duly posted and Planning Manager Mike
Poland indicated that the Agenda was in fact duly posted.
Item #5- Minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Landeros and seconded by Commissioner Battle to
approve the Minutes from the Planning Commission meeting from June 14, 2016.
Item #6- Swearing in Speakers
City Clerk Maria Quinonez swore in members of the audience.
Item #7- Public Orals
None
Item #8- Public Orals (Non - Agenda)
None
1
Item #9- Plannino Commission Oral & Written Communications
None
NEW REGULAR AGENDA (PUBLIC HEARING)
Item #10 A- Conditional Use Permit 2016 -03
AAQolicant: Rafel Munoz
3114 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd
Proposal:
Planning Manager Mike Poland introduced the item to the Commission and provided
information from the staff report. The applicant, Rafael Munoz, is requesting that the
Planning Commission consider and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016 -03 to
establish a general mechanic shop with smog check services. The property is located at
3114 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. in the C -3 (Heavy Commercial) zone.
Recommendation:
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3362 approving
Conditional Use Permit 2016 -03.
Vice Chair West opened Public Hearing
Victor Najera spoke in favor of the project.
Maribel Figueroa spoke in favor of the project.
Alex Munoz, 6814 Ponsayo Avenue, spoke in favor of the project.
Commissioner Landeros asked Mr. Munoz what the front unit would be used for.
Mr. Munoz stated that the front unit would be used an office.
Vice Chair West closed public hearing.
Commissioner Younger asked if state approval was required for a smog station
business.
Planning Manager Poland stated that the business would require certification from the
DMV.
2
Interim Director Ramirez presented to the Planning Commission a few questions from
Chair Casanova in reference to the applicant willing to paint the building and make
additional landscaping.
Vice Chair stated that the items could be placed as conditions.
Commissioner Landeros asked for the business hours.
Planning Manager Poland stated business hours were Monday through Saturday, 8:00
AM to 5:00 PM.
Hearing no further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Younger, seconded by
Commissioner Landeros to approve:
RESOLUTION NO 3362 APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-
03, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A GENERAL MEHANIC SHOP WITH SMOG
CHECK SERVICES. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3114 MARTIN LUTHER
KING ]R BOULEVARD. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 6170 - 026 -018 IN THE
C -3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) SONE AND HAS A GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
OF COMMERCIAL, , CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL:
AYES: BATTLE, LANDEROS, YOUNGER, WEST
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: CASANOVA
ITEM #10 B (Conditional Use Permit No. 2016 -041
Applicant: Alex Meruelo Trust (Del Taco)
12622 Long Beach Boulevard
Proposal:
Planning Manger Poland introduced the item to the Commission and provided
information from the staff report. The applicant, Alex Meruelo Trust is requesting that
the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 2016 -04, allowing the
construction of a new restaurant with 24 -hour drive -thru service. The property is located
at 12622 Long Beach Boulevard in the C -2A (Medium Commercial) zone and within
Village IV of the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan.
3
Recommendation:
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3363 approving
Conditional Use Permit 2016 -04.
Vice Chair West opened public hearing.
George Euing (sp ?), 359 North Harwood Street Orange, California, Director of Design
and Construction for Del Taco, thanked staff for all the support given to them and
spoke in favor of the project.
Armando Delgado, 18722 Ambrose Lane, Huntington Beach, VP of Real Estate for Alex
Meruelo, spoke in favor of the project.
Commissioner Younger expressed concern for resident safety.
Applicant stated that the there would be camera and security systems throughout the
site and the area would have ample lighting.
Commissioner Landeros stated that the area of the proposed location is a high -crime
and asked how the applicant was to prevent any incidents with the neighboring
residences.
Applicant stated that the site will be well lit and visible and that the layout was designed
so as there would not be any noise and visibility of the drive -thru and dining room for
the neighboring residences.
Vice Chair West asked if the trash bin would be opened or closed.
Applicant stated that the trash cans themselves have lids themselves.
Vice Chair asked applicant what the approach will be for elimination of graffiti.
Applicant stated that graffiti removal would be part of regular maintenance.
Vice Chair asked if there were any members of the audience speaking against the
project.
Francisco Palencia, 3525 Orchard Avenue, stated that he was not against the project
but did express concern for the security of the residences as it is a high -crime area. Mr.
Palencia asked if the entrance and exit for the restaurant could be strictly limited to
Long Beach Boulevard and if a wall could be placed on the Orchard side of the property
and a wall to divide the apartments.
0
Malaquiel Moreno, 3521 Orchard Avenue, stated that he was not against the project but
asked that a wall be placed to divide the apartments next to the proposed location as a
way to diminish sound and traffic. He also asked that the hours of operation be
regulated as the locations is a high -crime area and has a major prostitution issue.
Rudy Moreno, 3521 Orchard Avenue, stated he did not have an issue with the new
business but he expressed concern for the parking and traffic issue already present. Mr.
Moreno asked if the entrance and exit be limited to Long Beach Boulevard as it will
greatly diminish the traffic flow on the Orchard side and that a wall be built along
Orchard side to lower noise from the business.
Vice Chair West gave the applicant an opportunity to address the concerns of the
members of the audience.
Applicant stated that Del Taco was willing to place a block wall between the residences
and the residences. and to limit the dining room hours. Mr. Delgado stated that Long
Beach Boulevard has a median that would not allow an entrance to the property if
traveling south.
Vice Chair asked for clarification on the "street indication" labeled on the plans as it
appeared to be within the property line.
Public Works Manager Saikaly stated that the street indication had been placed years
before to make Long Beach Boulevard 100 feet wide from right -of -way to right -of -way
and stated that if a wall was to be placed on the Orchard side of the property, residents
would have impaired vision of any traffic coming easterly on Orchard Avenue.
Planning Manager suggested placing a four foot wrought iron fence in front of any
shrubbery to be placed.
Commissioner Landeros did not agree with the height of the four foot wrought iron
fence.
Vice Chair West stated a higher fence would impair line of sight.
Commissioner Landeros expressed concern on possible sidewalk flooding during rainy
season.
Hearing no further discussion, with the conditions of a four foot wrought iron fence with
shrubbery along Orchard, a six foot masonry wall along the easterly property line, and
restrictions on hours of operation for both the dining room and drive - thru., it was
moved by Commissioner Younger, seconded by Commissioner Landeros to approve:
5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2016 -04 RESOLUTION NO 3363
APPPROVING TO ALLOW A NEW RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE -THRU SERVICE
ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12622 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 6177 - 003 -021, 036, 037 AND 039 IN THE C2 -A (MEDIUM
COMMERCIAL) ZONE AND WITHIN VILLAGE IV OF THE LONG BEACH
SPECIFIC PLAN, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL:
AYES: BATTLE, LANDEROS, YOUNGER, WEST
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: CASANOVA
ITEM #11- Old Business
Applicant: Bavesh Patel (Rodeway Inn)
10112 Long Beach Boulevard
Discussion:
Interim Director of Department of Development, Compliance & Enforcement Services
Ramirez introduced the item to the Commission and provided information from the staff
report. The Interim Director is requesting that the Planning Commission give staff
direction to make a determination of substantial conformance for the proposed
architecture element (paint color) modification request for previously approved
Conditional Use Permit 2015 -03.
Vice Chair West asked for the applicant to speak to the Commission.
Applicant Bavesh Patel, 17315 Eli Avenue, Cerritos, California, stated that the colors
chosen match the colors of other neighboring properties.
Commissioner Landeros stated that the colors chosen for the building was acceptable.
By unanimous consent, the Planning Commission approved the colors chosen by the
applicant.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Battle thanked staff for an early agenda.
Commissioner Younger thanked staff and addressed garage conversions and the
negative effects of parking issues.
M
Commissioner Landeros thanked Public Works for paving State Street.
STAFF ORALS
Interim Director Ramirez stated that she would be out of the office for two weeks.
Public Works Manager stated that the paving on Josephine Street and State Street had
been completed.
AD70URMENT
Having no further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Younger and seconded by
Vice Chair West to adjourn the meeting.
Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:42 PM
PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY:
qAAI&2
Erb Ramirez, Interi Director
Department of Development,
Compliance and Enforcement Services
7
City Qf LYNWOOD Cc=
�A C)Ey vucetug CIwQQenget
11330 BULLIS ROAD j
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
)310) 6010220
DATE: August 30, 2016
TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Erika Ramirez, Interim Director Department of Development,
Compliance and Enforcement Services
Karen Figueredo, Planning Associate
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016 -01 to subdivide one (1) parcel's air
space to allow three (3) detached condominiums.
APPLICANT: Raul Echemendia
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. DETERMINE that Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016 -01 is Categorically Exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15315 Minor
Land Divisions.
2. APPROVE Resolution No. 3364 thereby approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-
01 to subdivide one (1) parcel's air space to allow three (3) detached condominiums
on property located at 3304 Cedar Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
"I MOVE THAT THE CITY OF LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE
RESOLUTION NO. 3364 BASED ON THE FINDINGS OUTLINED IN THE
ATTACHED RESOLUTION ".
PROJECT:
The applicant, Raul Echemendia, is requesting that the Planning Commission consider
and approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016 -01 to subdivide one (1) parcel's air space
to allow three (3) detached condominiums. The property is located at 3304 Cedar
Avenue, further described as Assessor's Parcel Number 6168 -012 -012.
BACKGROUND:
The Property is located on the south side of Cedar Avenue between Lindbergh Avenue
and Alpine Avenue in the R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) zone. The Property is irregular
in shape and totals approximately 9,160 square feet in area.
As part of the subdivision, the applicant proposes to demolish the existing house and
garage and create three (3) detached condominiums. The proposed condominiums are
two -story in height with three (3) bedrooms and attached two -car garages.
DISCUSSION
The Subdivision Map Act, codified in Government Code Section 66400 et seq., governs
subdivision tract and parcel maps. Under Section 25 -180 -2 of the Lynwood Municipal
Code ( "LMC "), the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act relating to the review and
approval of tentative, final, and parcel maps are applicable to the City.
Per Section 66474, the Planning Commission cannot approve a tentative map if it finds
any of the following:
• That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific
plans as specified in Section 65451.
• That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
• That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.
• That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
• That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
• That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause
serious public health problems.
• That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision.
Staff believes that none of the above applies to the Project and therefore the Planning
Commission can approve the Tentative Map. Specifically, the following findings can be
made:
1. The Tentative Map is consistent with the approved, applicable general and
specific plans:
The Tentative Map will result in the subdivision of the Property, one (1) parcel's
air space to allow three (3) detached condominiums. The current zoning of R -3
(Multi - Family Residential) is consistent with the General Plan Land Use
designation of residential for the Property. The Property will be improved with
uses consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan.
2. The Property is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of
development:
The Property will be developed with three (3) detached two -story condominiums
with attached two -car garages. The condominiums conform to the density
permitted within R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) zone. The proposed Project will
also be compatible with the surrounding uses, as they consist of single and multi-
family residential uses.
3. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental
damage, substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, cause
serious public health problems, or conflict with public easements:
The Project will result in the development of the Property in an area that is fully
developed. The Project will not be built on or near habitats of fish or wildlife.
The Project will not cause serious health problems because the residential use is
similar to the surrounding uses and permitted by the General Plan. There are no
conflicting public easements on the Property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
1. DETERMINE That Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016 -01 is Categorically Exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15315 Minor
Land Division.
2. APPROVE Resolution No. 3364 thereby approving Tentative Parcel map No. 2016-
01 to subdivide one (1) parcel's air space to allow three (3) detached condominiums
on the property.located at 3304 Cedar Avenue.
ATTACHMENTS:
LOCATION MAP
AERIAL PHOTO
RESOLUTION No. 3364
LOCATION MAP
1 330 ;
r mo
33ol 33 3 t'
.:1007
) 019
101:
J�
r_-
� f
fir
furl i" 74' •s €4,
4 ' ;� �4 • �, y�flyp rl,kk ��f t� k,f..�_r
I
44
�, w .30 4 Cedar Avenue
77
NY
RESOLUTION NO. 3364
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 2016 -01 (74275) TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1)
PARCEL'S AIR SPACE TO ALLOW THREE (3) DETACHED
CONDOMINIUMS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3304
CEDAR AVENUE, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 6168-
012 -012 IN THE R -3 (MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE,
CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood as
follows:
A. Recitals
(i) Raul Echemendia, property owner, has filed an application for issuance of
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016 -01 to subdivide one (1) parcel's air space to allow three
(3) detached condominiums 3304 Cedar Avenue, Lynwood, California 90262 (APN:
6168 - 012 -012) in the County of Los Angeles. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as the "application ". This resolution
supplements any previous approvals for this location.
(ii) On August 30, 2016, this Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this
Resolution.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lynwood as follows:
A. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in
the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
B. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Planning Commission
during the above - referenced hearing, including written staff reports, verbal testimony,
and development plans approved August 30, 2016, this Planning Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
1. The Tentative Map is consistent with the approved, applicable general and
specific plans:
The Tentative Map will result in the subdivision of the Property, one (1) parcel's
air space to allow three (3) detached condominiums. The current zoning of R -3
(Multi - Family Residential) is consistent with the General Plan Land Use
designation of residential for the Property. The Property will be improved with
uses consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan.
2. The Property is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of
development:
The Property will be developed with three (3) detached two -story condominiums
with attached two car garages. The condominiums conform to the density
permitted within R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) zone. The proposed Project will
also be compatible with the surrounding uses, as they consist of single and multi-
family residential uses.
3. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental
damage, substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, cause
serious public health problems, or conflict with public easements:
The Project will result in the development of the Property in an area that is fully
developed. The Project will not be built on or near habitats of fish or wildlife. The
Project will not cause serious health problems because the residential use is
similar to the surrounding uses and permitted by the General Plan. There are no
conflicting public easements on the Property.
C. In view of all the evidence and based on the foregoing findings and
conclusions, the Planning Commission approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016 -01
subject to the following conditions:
1. The City has determined that City, its employees, agents and officials should, to
the fullest extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury,
damage, claim, lawsuit, expense, attorney fees, litigation expenses, court cost or
any other cost arising out of or in any way related to the issuance of this
Tentative Parcel map, or the activities conducted pursuant to this Tentative
Parcel Map. Accordingly, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Raul Echemendia
and its representative (s), or its successors shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City , its employees, agents and officials, from and against any
liability , claims, suits, actions, arbitrations proceedings, regulatory proceedings,
losses, expenses or cost of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened,
including, but not limited to, actual attorney fees, litigation expenses and court
costs of any kind without restriction or limitation, incurred in relation to, as a
consequence of arising out of or in any way attributable to, actually, allegedly or
2
impliedly, in whole or in part , the issuance of the Tentative Parcel Map, or the
activities conducted pursuant to this Tentative Parcel Map. Raul Echemendia,
and its representative(s), or its successors shall pay such obligations as they
incurred by City, its employees, agents and officials, and in the event of any
claim or lawsuit, shall submit a deposit in such amount as the City reasonably
determines necessary to protect the City from exposure to fees, costs or liability
with respect to such claim or lawsuit.
2. The project shall comply with all regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the
California Building Code, the Los Angeles County Fire Code, other City
Departments and applicable State and Federal regulations.
3. Within twenty -four (24) months, after approval or conditional approval of the
Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivide shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Parcel
Map in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as conditional
approval, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision
Regulations of the City of Lynwood.
4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of the
Parcel Map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City of Lynwood,
in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the
Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood.
5. Extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval shall only be considered if the
applicant or his /her representative, submits a written request for extension to the
Department of Development Compliance and Enforcement Services stating the
reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval id due to
expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25 -18, of the subdivision
regulations of the City of Lynwood.
6. All appeals must be brought within ten (10) working days of the date of the final
action by the Planning Commission. Persons filing the appeal must submit
application and pay a fee of $920.26.
7. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to
this approving action shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said action by
the Lynwood Planning Commission.
8. The applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) for
City review and approval that are applicable to all owners and occupants of the
property site. The CC &R's shall be approved by the City and recorded on the
property title prior to approval of the final map.
3
9. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall create a property owners'
association (association) consistent with State law requirements to ensure
effective management and maintenance of the property. The association shall be
operated by a qualified professional property management company, hired by the
association, which shall be responsible for continual maintenance of all common
areas, including, but not limited to, parking lots, landscaping, plumbing, fire
protection water systems, wiring, trash enclosures, utility areas, utility charges,
vehicular and pedestrian circulation areas, exteriors of the buildings, facades,
and roofs. The association shall also be responsible for maintaining shared water
facilities, including payment of water - related charges.
10. Initially, the applicant shall establish the association with adequate financial
reserves to maintain major site components (e.g., common area), ensure for
continued operation of the site within accepted professional standards, and
provide adequate and appropriate assessment procedure for said continuing
obligation. The provisions of this condition shall be incorporated into the CC &R's
recorded on the project site.
11. The CC &Rs shall require that the property management association operate the
site as a unified, well maintained, and cohesively operated property. Exterior
renovations, remodeling, and site improvements shall be undertaken in a
comprehensive manner, including consistent architecture and design on all
facades and roofs. This provisions shall be incorporated into the CC &Rs
recorded in the project site.
Department of Public Works
12. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off -site improvements.
13. No final sign off shall be given until all conditions of approval from the Public
Works Department have been completed.
14. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO
RECORDING A SUBDIVISION MAP.
14.1 All conditions of the State Subdivision Map Act and the City's subdivision
Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances,
standards, and procedures of the City's Development Standards,
Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water Standards, and Planting
Standards of the Department of Public Works, Parks and Recreations. The
Developer is responsible for checking with staff for clarification of these
requirements.
4
14.2 Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to the Department of Public
Works /Engineering Division.
The final mal shall be based on a field survey. All surveying for the
proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the
establishment of centerline ties if any. Enclose with the final map the
surveyor's closure sheets.
14.3 Developer shall pay all applicable development fees including drainage,
sewer, water prior to issuance of any building permits.
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be
paid prior to recording the final map. All requirements to the serving
utilities to be met or guaranteed prior to recording of the final map.
14.4 Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking.
15. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ISSUING
A BUILDING PERMIT.
15.1 A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for
the approval of the Director of Public Works /Engineering Division. The
grading plan shall include topography of all contiguous properties and
street and shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with all
applicable City Standards. Retaining walls and other protective measures
may be required.
Off -site drainage easements may be necessary. The structural section of
all parking areas shall be designated by a Civil Engineer based upon soil
analysis supplied by a recognized and approved soil engineer firm. The
structural section shall be approved by the Director of Public
Works /Engineering Division. In the event that the design is not provided,
the minimum structural section that will be approved by the Director of
Public Works /Engineering Division would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4
inches on untreated rock base.
Submit to the Department of Public Works /Engineering Division a
Geological /Soil Report signed by a Registered Soil Engineer.
16. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ISSUING
THE CERTIFICATE OF OCUPANCY.
16.1 The developer shall be provided with public sewer. Connect to public
sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all sanitary sewer shall be
approved by the Director of Public Works /Engineering Division.
5
16.2 All required water meters, meter service changes and /or fire protection
lines shall be installed by the developer. The new meter shall be
Automatic Meter reading type (Smart Meter). That offers pulse output or a
radio interface, and shall be approved by the Department of Public Works
prior to installation. Each building shall be connected separately. The work
shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The
contractor must obtain a permit from the Department of Public
Works /Engineering Division prior to performing any work. Any and all
existing water service line less than one (1) inch in diameter shall be
abandoned at the water main line per City instructions. Each
building /tenant shall have its own water service /meter.
16.3 Design, configuration and location of sidewalk shall be subject to the
approved by the Director of Public Works /Engineering Division, and the
Special Assistant of Development Services. Ramps for physically
handicapped persons shall be provided both on -site and off -site as
required by State and local regulations.
16.4 Reconstruct full width of sidewalk along Cedar Avenue. Per S.P.P.W.C.
STD. DWG. 113 -2.
16.5 Remove round curb and construct new curb only along property frontage
per S.P.P.W.C. STD. DWG. 120 -2, Al -6 (150).
16.6 Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach per S.P.P.W.C.
STD. DWG. 110 -2 TYPE A (to be used for ingress and egress as shown
on the site plan).
16.7 The minimum distance between the garage or parking spaces and back of
sidewalk or fence is twenty five (25) feet.
16.8 Connect to public sewer. A private sewer main shall be installed in the
private driveway connecting to the public sewer. Building sewer laterals
shall be connected separately to this main from the house. A clean out or
manhole structure as required shall be installed separately. Construct
laterals as necessary. Minimum size required is eight (8) inch when
connecting to an existing lateral, a City approved contractor shall verify the
size of such lateral and shall provide proof of its integrity by proving a video
tape of the lateral to the Department of Public Works /Engineering Division.
Videotaping and verification of sewer later size and conditions must be
done in the presence of a City Engineer /inspector. Any and all existing
sewer laterals less than six (6) inches in diameter shall be abandoned at
the property line per City instructions.
3
16.9 Underground all new utilities.
16.10 Underground existing utilities if any modifications are proposed for the
electrical service panel.
16.11 All Edison vaults and structures shall be per SCE instructions.
16.12 This development is subject to the City's Standard Urban Stormwater
Mitigation Plan Ordinance (SUSMP). Pursuant to section 14.13 of the City
of Lynwood Municipal Code relating to the control of pollutants carried by
stormwater runoff, structural and /or treatment control best management
practices (BMP's); a maintenance agreement for the Standard Urban
Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) shall be signed by the owner(s) and
submitted to the Department of Public Works /Engineering Division, prior to
issuance of a building permit.
Fire Prevention
17. Review and approval by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department Fire
Prevention Engineering Section Building Plan Check Unit may be required for
this project prior to building permit issuance. Contact the Fire Prevention
Engineering Section Plan Check office checked below for specific submittal
requirements for this project.
Fire Prevention Commerce Office
5823 Rickenbacker Road
Commerce, CA 90040
(323) 890 -4125
18. Final approvals from the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be obtained
prior to issuance of any building permits.
APPROVED this 301h day of August 2016 by members of the Planning
Commission, voting as follows:
YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
7
Erika Ramirez, Interim Director
Department of Development,
Compliance and Enforcement Services
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
City Ctf LYNWOOD
vt Caq Meeltrg O wRexges
11330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD. CALIFORNIA 90262
(310) 603-0220
August 30, 2016
Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission
Board
Erika Ramirez, Interim Director Department of Development,
Compliance and Enforcement �cesc {�
Bruno Naulls, Project Managejfi/.y
Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan and Lynwood Transit
Area Specific Plan EIR
City of Lynwood, CA
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. `1 MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 3366 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
THE LYNWOOD TRANSIT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN "; and
Z '7 MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 3367 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN TEXT AND LAND USE MAP,
ESTABLISHING THE "LTASP" LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA ", and
3. `1 MOVE THAT THE PLANNING ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 3368
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE
LYNWOOD TRANSIT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL EIR, ADOPT A
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND
ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS ".
1
PROPOSAL:
The proposed Specific Plan includes policies and development standards to
guide the development of future transit - oriented communities within a 315 -acre
project area, generally encompassing properties located along Long Beach
Boulevard, from Virginia Avenue to Norton Avenue; along Imperial Highway, from
Alameda Street to Martin Luther King Boulevard; the Plaza Mexico shopping
center; the Long Beach Boulevard Green Line Station and Long Beach
Boulevard /1 -105 Freeway Ramps; the industrial uses located along Alameda
Street, just south and north of the 1 -105 Freeway; the St. Francis Medical Center;
and existing residential and commercial uses located along Beechwood Avenue,
Sanborn Avenue, Mulford Avenue, and California Avenue.
The Specific Plan concentrates and prioritizes development of key opportunity
sites totaling approximately 141 acres, along major roadway corridors, existing
industrial and hospital districts, and existing neighborhoods within 0.5 miles of
the Metro Green Line Station and within 0.5 miles of the junction of the Alameda
Street and Imperial Highway bus corridors. In addition, the Specific Plan is
intended to facilitate transit - oriented community design by promoting complete
streets, expanded transit services, and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle linkages
throughout the Plan Area.
It is envisioned that full implementation of the proposed Specific Plan during the
proposed 25 -year planning horizon could increase density and intensity of
residential, commercial and industrial development, including the following:
• Up to 3,500 residential dwellings;
• Up to 1,200,000 million square feet of commercial development;
• Up to 350 hotel rooms; and
• Up to 750,000 square feet of industrial development.
2
j• ` j �' rgMp Jr eMe
tj
t. AOOOn qo
+p ., .may* y • � _ •' +':�cya Vio �� _.
�1 � •s aV4 _
• '�, � �.. • ,. Nerlon Ar. � � Ey ;e�6 .
r., 9 •f.; +�a� N w }'p •;+.e,^ �- i1V�vr 3,� � t- y(r ^Q•-
r o, • YuNO t jY
tj
AK
iV, 4. `� .1: 1 ` •10.5 ya.
e ti
1S1 � e r •,r � �,
_•� .'ate' � •,y i ;'.v `r � i - Fi
ow
-1
that supports the Lynwood Transit Area vision. The grant award recognized the
importance of creating transit - oriented development around the City's existing
Metro station, which could function as a center of commerce and employment
and as a center of a growing community with great access to regional
transportation.
On April 15, 2014, TranSystems was awarded the project based upon total
score, qualifications, project understanding and cost. Due to personnel matters, it
was not feasible for TranSystems (Consultant) to maintain its position as primary
consultant on the contract and the Consultant wished to assign its duties as
primary to one of its subconsultants in order to fulfill the obligations of the
Agreement. TranSystems identified subconsultant Michael R. Kodama Planning
Consultants as a viable candidate to assume the position of the Principal
consultant and allow TranSystems to assume the position of a subconsultant. On
December 16, 2014 MK Planning Consultants (hereafter "Consultant ") was
assigned the contract awarded to TranSystems for the preparation of the
Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan ( "Specific Plan ") and the associated
Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") pursuant to council resolution 2014.228.
The preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR involved close coordination with
City of Lynwood staff members, decision makers, and community members. The
Specific Plan's design recommendations were based upon input received from
City officials, stakeholders, and community members during multiple rounds of
public outreach meetings held in May, August, and January 2016. City Staff and
the City's Consultants also held regular stakeholder meetings and staff meetings
during the plan preparation period to discuss critical issues, such as: (1)
development trends, (2) land use, zoning, and parking issues, (3) Metro Station
safety, and reconfiguration of the 1- 105 /Long Beach Boulevard intersection. The
scope of analysis within the EIR was informed through consultation with the state
and local agencies and members of the community, where participants were
encouraged to share their insights on future development in the city and their
concerns regarding environmental impacts. Most recently on July 26, 2016,
representatives of the City and the consulting team held a public workshop to
present the Specific Plan and the conclusions contained within the EIR and to
receive comments from all interested parties in attendance.
Overall, the outreach efforts facilitated the sharing of ideas for enhancing transit
services and urban design, the discussion of visual preferences, the
establishment of community goals, and incorporating mitigation measures to
reduce potential environmental impacts to the greatest extent feasible. All of the
comments received during this public workshop have been incorporated into the
Final Specific Plan and Final EIR.
DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS:
Specific Plans
El
A specific plan is a planning tool that provides for the systematic implementation
of the general plan for all or part of the area covered by a city's general plan.
Specific plans, which may be adopted either by ordinance or resolution, are in
common use throughout California. A specific plan is a legislative act through
which area - specific development standards may be established. This makes the
specific plan a straightforward way to create a vision for the future development
for the entire plan area while at the same time establishing development
guidelines or standards, improvement strategies, and financing mechanisms.
The procedures for adoption and the required contents of specific plans are set
forth in Government Code sections 65450 through 65457. Under Government
Code section 65451, a specific plan must include:
1. the distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land, including open
space, within the area covered by the plan;
2. the proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major
components of public and private transportation, sewage, water,
drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities
proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and
needed to support the land uses described in the plan;
3. standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and
standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural
resources, where applicable; and
4. a program of implementation measures including regulations,
programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to
carry out paragraphs (1), (2), and (3).
The specific plan must also include a statement of the relationship of the specific
plan to the general plan. The specific plan may also address any other subjects
which are necessary or desirable for the implementation of the general plan.
Environmental Review Process
A Program EIR was prepared for the Specific Plan. Program EIRs are typically
more conceptual and may contain a more general discussion of impacts,
alternatives, and mitigation measures than a Project EIR. Nevertheless, The
Program EIR examines all environmental impacts of the project as compared to
the existing environment in the vicinity of the project from both a local and
regional perspective, based on maximum use and intensity as envisioned within
the Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan.
The preparation, review and certification process for this EIR included the
following steps:
1. Notice of Preparation (NOP) — In accordance with Section 15082(a)
of the CEQA Guidelines, the City circulated the NOP on December 11,
2015. The NOP provided a description of the project, its location and
the project's probable environmental effects. The original NOP is
included as Attachment A of the EIR. These documents were
5
circulated in accordance with CEQA, including local, regional, state
and federal agencies as well as made available to the public via the
City website; mailed to all persons including businesses, or other
public or private entities utilizing the City's utility bill distribution
process; and posted for 30 days in the office of the County Clerk.
Moreover, the City held a NOP scoping meeting on January 12, 2016.
2. Draft EIR (DEIR) —A DEIR for the Project was prepared and contained
all required content, pursuant to Sections 15084 and 15120 of the
CEQA Guidelines, including the following:
i. Description of the project;
ii. Description of the environmental setting;
iii. Identification of the project's significant environmental effects
(direct, indirect and long term);
iv. Reasons that possible significant environmental impacts were
found to be insignificant;
V. Discussion and analysis of significant cumulative impacts;
vi. Identification and description of feasible implementation
measures to reduce or avoid each significant environmental
effect of the project; and
vii. Description of a reasonable range of alternatives to the project.
Upon completion of the DEIR on the City filed a Notice of Completion
(NOC) with the State Office of Planning and Research, in accordance
with Section 15085 of the CEQA Guidelines. This began the 45 -day
public review period for the project DEIR.
3. Public Notice and Public Review — Pursuant to Section 15087(a) and
concurrent with the NOC, the City provided public notice on the
availability of the DEIR for public review and comment. The 45 -day
public review period for the DEIR began on July 1, 2016 and
concluded on August 15, 2016. Comment letters on the DEIR were
received from Caltrans, METRO, Los Angeles County Airport Land
Use Commission, and community members during the July 26, 2016
public workshop.
4. Response to Comments & Final EIR (FEIR) — Following the public
review and comment period of the DEIR, a Final EIR (FEIR) for the
Specific Plan was prepared, which included written responses to all
comments received during the DEIR circulation period as required
under CEQA. These responses addressed any significant
environmental issues raised by any of the commenters. As part of this
process, the Planning Commission and the City Council will review and
consider the FEIR prior to taking any action in connection with the
proposed project. The FEIR, which includes the response to comments
on the DEIR, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, is
included as Attachment B of this staff report.
3
5. Certification of the FEIR — The Planning Commission can make the
recommendation to the City Council to certify the Specific Plan's Final
EIR if it finds that:
L The FEIR is "adequate and complete';
ii. The FEIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis;
and
iii. The FEIR was presented to the Planning Commission, which
reviewed and considered the information of the FEIR, prior to
making its recommendation.
This recommendation to certify the FEIR also includes
recommendations to adopt the CEQA findings. In addition, this
recommendation would include adoption of the Statement of
Overriding Considerations and the Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting
Program, as follows:
Staff Analysis:
Statement of Overriding Considerations — As described in
more detail below, implementation of the Specific Plan would
have some significant impacts that could not be feasibly
mitigated, and thus would remain significant and unavoidable.
In recommending the aforementioned approvals, the Planning
Commission therefore must also recommend adoption of a
Statement of Overriding Considerations. The requirement
reflects the statutory policy under CEQA that public agencies
must weigh a proposed project's benefits against its
unavoidable environmental risks (e.g., as identified in the EIR),
and may find the adverse impacts "acceptable" if the benefits
outweigh those effects.
Mitigation Monitoring — The Planning Commission must also
recommend the adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for mitigation measures that have been
incorporated into or imposed upon future developments within
the Specific Plan area to reduce or avoid significant effects on
the environment. Any mitigation measures adopted by the City
as part of the certified EIR will be considered as conditions of
approval of the Specific Plan and will be included in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure and
verify compliance.
7
General Plan Consistenc
The Specific Plan would establish new land use designations, design guidelines,
development standards, and implementation strategies that support the overall
objective of facilitating future transit - oriented development in the Plan Area.
Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway and the properties immediately
adjacent to these corridors would be designated Corridor Mixed -Use 1 (CMU -1)
and Corridor -Mixed Use 2 (CMU -2), respectively. The intent of the CMU -1 and
CMU -2 districts is to promote mixed -use commercial with residential as a
secondary use and to encourage revitalization and investment. This zone would
generally apply to parcels fronting Imperial Highway and Long Beach Boulevard.
The Town Center (TC) district encompasses the properties located south and
northwest of Imperial Highway and west of Long Beach Boulevard (i.e., the Plaza
Mexico shopping center and the properties west of State Street). The intent of
the TC land use designation is to provide for the development of a transformative
mixed -use transit collection of locally- and regionally - serving commercial, retail,
and entertainment uses, as well as a variety of urban housing choices within
walking distance of transit services. The Transit Station (TS) designation includes
the Metro Green Line station, the surrounding park and ride lots, and the 1 -105
Freeway on -ramps proposed for re- configuration. The intent of the TS
designation is to provide a vibrant, walkable environment that enhances the
existing Metro Green Line station and incorporates public use portions of a
reconfigured 1 -105 interchange.
The Residential (R) designation encompasses the residential properties located
south of Imperial Highway and east of the Long Beach Boulevard corridor,
primarily along Beechwood Avenue, Sanborn Avenue, Mulford Avenue,
California Avenue and others. The intent of the Residential designation is to
preserve existing and allow new small to medium lot detached homes and
reinforce their role within a walkable neighborhood.
The Open Space (OS) designation encompasses the areas parallel to the
northern boundary of 1 -105 behind Plaza Mexico, and extends further west of
State Street and Imperial Highway. This district also encompasses the northeast
quadrant of the 1- 105 /Long Beach Boulevard interchange and the areas parallel
to the 1 -105 until its connection with Fernwood Avenue. The intent of the Open
Space designation is to create land for parks, bicycle and pedestrian pathways,
and open space supportive of transit - oriented development.
The Industrial (1) designation encompasses the existing industrial uses located
east of Alameda Street and south of 1 -105. The intent of this designation is to
provide an urban form that can accommodate a very diverse range of industrial
uses, including heavy and light industrial uses, and live -work.
The St. Francis Medical (SFM) designation encompasses the existing St. Francis
Medical Center campus and the areas immediately northwest of Imperial
3
Highway. The intent of this district is to meet the existing and future needs of the
St. Francis Medical Center campus, while ensuring compatibility with adjacent
land uses. The designation will also maintain and promote medical, clinic,
medical office, and associated supportive uses such as incidental retail,
supportive residential and parking, and expand pedestrian linkages and
connectivity between the St. Francis Medical Center, and the adjacent Lynwood
Civic Center.
These proposed land use districts described above would be generally consistent
with and would "overlay" (supersede) the underlying Mixed Use:
Retail /Commercial /Residential land use designation previously adopted as part of
the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, which was found to be consistent with
the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan is also consistent with goals, policies,
and objectives of the City of Lynwood General Plan and the as outlined in
Tables 15 -17 of the EIR. The Specific Plan is also consistent with the Long
Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, and the 2012 -2035 SCAG Regional
Transportation Plan /Sustainable Communities Strategy with inclusion of the
mitigation measures described throughout the EIR.
The Specific Plan's proposed Land Use Diagram is provided below in Figure 2.
9
SOUTH GATE
n Fy
WILLOWBROOK Vim®
Figure 2. Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan Land Use Diagram
10
SOUTH GATE
°L- n
Bd
�e
1
METROSInian Stop
- --
METRO Green UAe
F
Plan Area
LAND USE
®
C.ndd.r MdotlLseB
Residential
-
Tom center District
Transit Station
-
St. Francis Medical District
CorrWor Mixed Used
{ "r „
Ind.ettlal
®
Open space
Specific Plan Consistencv with State Law
The Specific Plan has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of California
Government Code Section 65450 through 65457, which grants local government
agencies the authority to prepare specific plans for any area covered by a
General Plan. California Government Code Sections 65450 through 65457
establish the authority to adopt a Specific Plan, identify the required contents of a
Specific Plan, and mandate that Specific Plans be consistent with the General
Plan within which they are included.
The Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan will guide future development within the
315 -acre plan area, as it sets forth a comprehensive planning vision as well as a
regulatory framework. In addition, it establishes the land use designations and
development standards for future development within the plan area. When
subsequent site - specific development proposals within the Specific Plan area are
presented to the City, planning staff will use the Specific Plan as a policy and
regulatory guide for subsequent project review. Projects will be evaluated for
consistency with Specific Plan policies and for conformance with development
standards and design guidelines. In situations where policies or standards
relating to a particular subject have not been provided in the Specific Plan, the
existing policies and standards of the City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance
will continue to apply. Any future amendment to the Specific Plan will require
review and approval from the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Final EIR
The FEIR contains a thorough analysis of the proposed project and considers all
impacts associated with the project request. A summary of the potentially (Class
II) significant environmental impacts are discussed below.
• Impact AQ -4. The proposed Specific Plan would increase traffic along all
studied roadway segments, however, increased traffic would not result in
the creation of carbon monoxide (CO) hotspots. The Specific Plan does
not envision siting sensitive receptors near sources of toxic air
contaminants. However, locating residential uses near transit services in
the City of Lynwood may involve locating some residential dwellings near
the 1 -105 Freeway and other major transportation corridors. Therefore,
impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations
would be potentially significant, but mitigable.
• Impact PS -5. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would add
3,500 residential units and an estimated 15,549 residents to the Plan
Area, which would increase use of recreational facilities, contributing to
their physical deterioration, and the city's parkland deficiency. Impacts
would be significant but mitigable.
• Impact U -1. Full buildout of development included under the proposed
Specific Plan would generate an increased demand for water. The City
11
would be able to supply projected demand based on existing entitlements
provided that the proposed project incorporates conservation measures.
Therefore, impacts to water supply would be significant but mitigable.
For the above - described impacts and mitigation measures have been identified
in various sections of the EIR as required under CEQA. These measures, when
implemented, will result in a less- than - significant impact for many of the impacts.
For all mitigation measures, it is essential that the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program is put into action to ensure the successful implementation of
such measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been
included as Appendix A of the Final EIR (included as Attachment B to this Staff
Report).
The Project will result in significant unavoidable impacts within the following issue
areas:
• Impact N -3. Traffic generated by buildout of the proposed Specific Plan
would incrementally increase noise levels on roads in the Plan Area. The
increase of up to 0.2 dBA would exceed the FTA Significance of Changes
in Operational Roadway Noise Exposure thresholds. Compliance with the
standards required in the Lynwood General Plan and implementation of
Mitigation Measures N -3(a) through N -3(e) would reduce roadway noise
impacts to the maximum extent feasible. With mitigation, roadway noise
impacts to interior noise levels in residences would be reduced to a less
than significant level. However, roadway noise impacts to exterior noise
levels would be significant and unavoidable.
• Impact T -2. The Specific Plan would increase traffic levels along road
segments under Existing Plus Project conditions. Based on project related
vehicle trips added to the roadway network, the project is anticipated to
have significant impacts on the Long Beach Boulevard roadway segment.
Impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
• Impact T -6. The Specific Plan would increase traffic levels along road
segments under Future Year (2040) Plus Project (2040) conditions. The
Project trips added to the roadway network would exceed the Los Angeles
County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) standards for four roadway
segments in the Plan Area. Impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
In order for a lead agency to approve a project which will result in significant
effects that are identified in the EIR but are not avoided or lessened to a less
than significant level, the lead agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to
support its action based on the Final EIR and other information in the record.
This is known as a "Statement of Overriding Considerations," as provided for in
Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines. The City must make specific findings
supporting the reasoning for such an approval, and CEQA requires the decision -
making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social,
technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable
12
environmental impacts when determining whether to approve the project. If the
specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed
project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse
environmental effects may be considered "acceptable," and the project may be
approved.
As detailed in the EIR and the draft CEQA Findings set forth in Planning
Commission Resolution 2016 -XX (Attachment C to this staff report), the following
findings were made as part of the Statement of Overriding Considerations:
The Project Will Create New Jobs and Satisfy a Need for Housing.
The Specific Plan envisions future development of up to 3,500 dwelling
units, up to 1.2 million square feet of commercial development, up to 350
hotel rooms, and approximately 750,000 square feet of industrial uses,
which could support up to 5,668 jobs. Considering the city's homeowner
and rental vacancy rates, it is anticipated that these housing units would
support up to 3,415 households. The 5,668 new jobs and 3,415 new
households, when added to the number of jobs and households that
existed in the city in 2012, would shift the job -to- housing ratio from 0.62 to
0.82 jobs per household. This improvement in the jobs -to- housing ratio
would allow a higher percentage of the city's residents to work locally,
thereby supporting sustainable growth by reducing the number of vehicle
miles traveled between work and home. Additionally, the mix of
commercial and residential uses would encourage complete
neighborhoods where services are available close to where people live.
• Implementation of Sustainable Development Patterns. The proposed
land use plan, development standards and design guidelines require
clustered development patterns for residential and commercial uses near
transit services. The Specific Plan would ensure that mobility,
accessibility, travel safety, and reliability for people and goods would be
maximized. Furthermore, the Specific Plan is designed to create
sustainable, urban neighborhoods, focused on providing a blend of parks,
strong businesses, and transit - oriented housing and commercial services,
as well as a wide range of multi -modal transportation practices. Access
and circulation improvements are based on the "Complete Streets"
concept to design the street network to accommodate all users
(pedestrians, bicycles, buses, automobiles, and trucks) safely and
efficiently.
• Provision of Public Amenities. Objective No. 5 of the proposed Specific
Plan is to: "Enhance Recreational Opportunities" by increasing landscaped
areas, parks, open space, and trails that support the public life of the
community. Facilitate security and well -being for the Specific Plan Area's
residents, employees, and visitors through increased activity, better
walkability, controls on cars and drivers, and better design and wayfinding.
Improvements envisioned in the Open Space land use designation shall
primarily include: (1) the development of a central plaza within the Town
13
Center land use designation; (2) the development of a linear park
containing a shared bicycle /pedestrian pathway and other amenities along
the southern boundary of the Town Center land use designation that
extends from Long Beach Boulevard west to the intersection of Fernwood
Avenue and Imperial Highway; (3) the development of an approximately
3.4 acre neighborhood park west of the Imperial Highway Fernwood
intersection;. and (4) the development of a linear park containing shared
bicycle /pedestrian pathway and other amenities along the south side of
Fernwood Avenue from its intersection with Long Beach Boulevard east to
Fir Street.
Proiect Alternatives
The FEIR evaluates a range of potential alternatives to the proposed project,
including: (1) No Project — No Further Development, (2) No Project (Buildout
Under Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan), and (3) Lower Growth Alternative —
Buildout per SCAG 2040 growth forecast. The FEIR examined the environmental
impacts of each alternative in comparison with the originally proposed project
and the relative ability of each alternative to satisfy the project objectives. Staff
had determined, for the reasons explained in the FEIR and the draft CEQA
Findings attached to this Staff Report, that each of the alternatives was
determined to be infeasible for a number of reasons, including that they either did
not satisfy most of the fundamental project objectives, and /or they were
inconsistent with County land use planning policies.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the attached Planning
Commission Resolution Nos. 2016 -XX, 2016 -XX, and 2016 -XX making certain
findings and recommending to the City Council approval of the Lynwood Transit
Area Specific Plan Project and the following associated land use approvals:
1. Adoption of the Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan,
2. Certify the EIR, adopt the required CEQA findings, adopt mitigation
measures, adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and
adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations.
3. Adoption of amendments to the City of Lynwood General Plan text and
land use map establishing the LTASP land use designation for the
Specific Plan Area, and
Attachments:
A. Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan
B. Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR and Draft EIR)
C. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3366
D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3367
E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3368
14
RESOLUTION NO. 3366
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE LYNWOOD
TRANSIT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, the City applied for and was awarded a Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA or Metro) 2012 -2013 Round 3
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Planning Grant to prepare, and adopt the
"Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan"
WHEREAS, since December 2014, City Staff and their consultants have
worked diligently meeting with community stakeholders, staff, elected officials,
and conducting field research compiling data in preparation of the Lynwood
Transit Area Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2015 the City published a Notice of
Preparation (NOP) and sent the NOP to the State Clearinghouse (SCH#
2015121020), who distributed the document to State reviewing agencies for a
30 -day public review period from December 11, 2015 through January 11, 2016;
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2016, the City held a public scoping meeting
regarding the preparation of the EIR;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2016, the City of Lynwood Published the Draft
Specific Plan for public review, which envisioned future development of up to
3,500 residential units, up to 1.2 million square feet of commercial development,
up to 350 hotel rooms, and up to 750,000 square feet of industrial development;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2016, the City and the Governor's Office of
Planning and Research distributed the Draft EIR, which identified and evaluated
the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Specific Plan and
associated entitlements to interested parties and responsible agencies (SCH
#2015121020) for a 45 -day public review period, July 1, 2016 through August 15,
2016;
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2016, a Notice of Availability for a Draft
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and EIR Community Meeting was published
in the Los Angeles Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation;
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2016, a public workshop was held to take
comments on the Draft EIR and Specific Plan. Following a presentation by the
City and their consultants, all members of the public in attendance were given the
opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR and Specific Plan;
1
WHEREAS, from July 26, 2016 through August 21, 2016 the City worked
with the consultants to prepare the Final EIR and Specific Plan. The Final EIR
and Specific Plan responds to the comments received on the Draft EIR and
Specific Plan and proposes minor text revisions;
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, a Notice of Public Hearing was
published in a newspaper of general and was mailed to all interested parties; and
WHEREAS, on August 30, 2016, the Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Final EIR, Specific Plan, and associated General
Plan Amendment and reviewed and considered the agenda report, reviewed and
considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND DECLARE, BASED UPON
EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO IT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Environmental Review
The Lynwood Planning Commission considered the Environmental Impact
Report for the proposed Specific Plan and in doing so found that the project
would not have significant adverse environmental impacts, except in two
resource categories (Noise and Traffic). In compliance with Public Resources
Code Section 12081 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15093, and as detailed in the Final EIR, changes and
alterations have been incorporated in the Specific Plan which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effect because feasible
mitigation measures included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) will be incorporated as conditions of approval for future development.
Nevertheless, the significant environmental effects cannot be feasibly mitigated
to a level of insignificance. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section
21002 and 21002.2, the Planning Commission has determined that there are
specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the
project which outweigh the significant effects on the environment and a
statement of overriding considerations has been prepared. This resolution
incorporates by reference the findings, analysis and recommendations set forth
in Planning Commission Resolution No.3368 which recommends that the City
Council certify the Final EIR, make findings of fact, and adopt a statement of
overriding consideration for the overall project.
Section 2.
Specific Plan Findings
Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25.120 recognizes that certain properties or
areas within the City may benefit from focused planning efforts wherein
2
infrastructure, land use relationships, land use intensities, public service needs,
and resource protection goals can be carefully examined and planned in a
comprehensive manner. The specific plan provides a mechanism to carry out
such planning efforts. The Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan has been
prepared in accordance with the relevant provisions state law (Government Code
§65451) and Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25.120. The Planning
Commission finds that proposed Specific Plan, as amended, is consistent with
the City of Lynwood General Plan; and more specifically finds as follows:
A. The Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan will guide future development
within the 315 -acre plan area, and it sets forth a comprehensive planning vision
as well as a regulatory framework. It establishes the land use designations and
development standards for future development within the plan area. The Specific
Plan envisions future development consisting of up to 3,500 residential dwellings,
1.2 million square feet of commercial uses, up to 350 hotel rooms, and up to
750,000 square feet of industrial development within 0.5 miles of the Long Beach
Boulevard Metro Station and 0.5 miles of the junction of the Alameda Street and
Imperial Highway bus corridors. In addition, the Specific Plan is intended to
facilitate transit - oriented community design by promoting complete streets,
expanded transit services, and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle linkages
throughout the plan area.
B. The City previously adopted the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan
over much of the same area regulated by the proposed Lynwood Transit Area
Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan will function as overlay district' for
the areas coterminous with the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan and will be
consistent with the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan's overall goal of
achieving a high - quality, aesthetically attractive urban area with land uses that
are conducive to the presence of transit. The specific plan meets all applicable
goals, objectives, policies, and requirements of the Lynwood General Plan with
its envisioned land use diagram, design guidelines, scale and specific amenities.
The Specific Plan also requires future development surrounding the existing
METRO facilities to utilize the proper notification procedures and construction
techniques.
C. The specific development standards in the Specific Plan are
compatible with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan,
establishing standards that are either the same as the current standards or within
the range of standards that could be permitted or justified using the existing
provisions for modifications.
D. The Specific Plan would allow buildings designed at a scale similar to
the existing commercial and mixed -use development located along Long Beach
Boulevard and Imperial Highway and residential buildings similar in scale to
those located along Beechwood Avenue, Sanborn Avenue, Mulford Avenue,
California Avenue, and others. Development standards have been tailored for
3
each land use designation and address items such as: building placement,
building height, density, frontage types, and parking to maximize compatibility
with the surrounding neighborhoods. Open space and streetscape improvement
guidelines are also included in the specific plan to provide connectivity between
destinations and other open spaces while offering areas for activity and
gathering.
E. The Specific Plan includes roadway improvement strategies designed
to maintain acceptable levels of local circulation in the plan area and adjacent
neighborhoods and good connections with the regional circulation network for
both transit and personal /commercial vehicles. The Specific Plan also includes
pedestrian and bicycle improvement strategies, including the establishment of a
dedicated network of bicycle and pedestrian pathways, sidewalk improvements,
and intersection enhancements.
F. The Specific Plan includes a comprehensive transportation and parking
management strategy to provide as many parking spaces as possible in a
common pool of shared, publicly available spaces while also managing parking
demand and increasing the availability of transit services for residents,
employees, and employers.
G. The Specific Plan includes guidelines for infrastructure improvement,
including future demolition and grading, drainage and water quality, water
service, wastewater service, and dry utilities.
H. The Specific Plan describes the roles, responsibilities, and procedures
required for the City of Lynwood, the development and other stakeholders during
implementation of the Specific Plan. It also describes the mechanisms for
increasing government and business representation, and funding sources for
implementation.
Section 3.
Recommendation
The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby recommends that the
City Council of the City of Lynwood adopt the Lynwood Transit Area Specific
Plan based on the findings stated herein and in light of the whole record.
M
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 30TH day of August, 2016, by
members of the Planning Commission, voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Erika Ramirez
Interim Director, Department of
Development, Compliance and
Enforcement Services
RESOLUTION NO. 3367
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT
TO THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION,
ESTABLISHING THE "LTASP" LAN D USEDESIGNATION FOR THE
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
WHEREAS, the City applied for and was awarded a Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA or Metro) 2012 -2013 Round 3
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Planning Grant to prepare, and adopt the
"Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan ";
WHEREAS, since December 2014, City Staff and their consultants have
worked diligently meeting with community stakeholders, staff, elected officials,
and conducting field research compiling data in preparation of the Lynwood
Transit Area Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2015 the City published a Notice of
Preparation (NOP) and sent the NOP to the State Clearinghouse (SCH#
2015121020), who distributed the document to State reviewing agencies for a
30 -day public review period from December 11, 2015 through January 11, 2016;
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2016, the City held a public scoping meeting
regarding the preparation of the EIR;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2016, the City of Lynwood Published the Draft
Specific Plan for public review, which envisioned future development of up to
3,500 residential units, up to 1.2 million square feet of commercial development,
up to 350 hotel rooms, and up to 750,000 square feet of industrial development;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2016, the City and the Governor's Office of
Planning and Research distributed the Draft EIR, which identified and evaluated
the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Specific Plan and
associated entitlements to interested parties and responsible agencies (SCH
#2015121020) for a 45 -day public review period, July 1, 2016 through August 15,
2016;
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2016, a Notice of Availability for a Draft
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and EIR Community Meeting was published
in the Los Angeles Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation;
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2016, a public workshop was held to take
comments on the Draft EIR and Specific Plan. Following a presentation by the
City and their consultants, all members of the public in attendance were given the
opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR and Specific Plan;
1
WHEREAS, from July 26, 2016 through August 21, 2016 the City worked
with the consultants to prepare the Final EIR and Specific Plan. The Final EIR
and Specific Plan responds to the comments received on the Draft EIR and
Specific Plan and proposes minor text revisions;
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, a Notice of Public Hearing was
published in a newspaper of general and was mailed to all interested parties;
and
WHEREAS, on August 30, 2016, the Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Final EIR, Specific Plan, and associated General
Plan Amendment and reviewed and considered the agenda report, reviewed and
considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND DECLARE, BASED UPON
EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO IT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findinqs
A. The Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan will be consistent with the
goals and policies set forth in the Lynwood General Plan.
B. The City previously adopted the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan
over much of the same area regulated by the proposed Lynwood Transit Area
Specific Plan. The proposed Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan will function as
"overlay district" for the areas coterminous with the Long Beach Boulevard
Specific Plan and will be consistent with the Long Beach Boulevard Specific
Plan's overall goal of achieving a high - quality, aesthetically attractive urban area
with land uses that are conducive to the presence of transit. The Lynwood
Transit Area Specific Plan meets all applicable goals, objectives, policies, and
requirements of the Lynwood General Plan with its envisioned land use diagram,
design guidelines, scale and specific amenities. The Lynwood Transit Area
Specific Plan also requires future development surrounding the existing METRO
facilities to utilize the proper notification procedures and construction techniques.
C. The specific development standards in the Lynwood Transit Area
Specific Plan are compatible with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and
the General Plan, establishing standards that are either the same as the current
standards or within the range of standards that could be permitted or justified
using the existing provisions for modifications.
D. The Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan will allow buildings designed
at a scale similar to the existing commercial and mixed -use development located
along Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway and residential buildings
similar in scale to those located along Beechwood Avenue, Sanborn Avenue,
2
- DEPARTMENTS TRANSPORTA -TION- — ----- ---- — - - - --
DISTRICT 7— OFTICE OF REGIONAL PLANNING
100 S. MAIN STREET, MS 16 ,,�Jy'
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 \
d�\ SeHausdr Drought.
PHONE(213)897 -9140
Serious auglH.
FAX (213) 897 -1337 Help save wafer!
www.dol.cn.gov
August 12, 2016
Mr. Bruno Naulls
Community Development Associate
City of Lynwood, Community Development
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Dear Mr. Naulls:
GoMOeSOlficeof Planning&&search
AUG 12 2g16
STATEELEARPNGHOUSE
RE: Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan
Vic. LA- 105 /PM 11.414
SCH # 2015121020
IGR TGS# 07 -LA -2016 -00009
Thank you for including die California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the
environmental review process for the above referenced project. The project consists of a Specific
Plan covering 315 acre area in the City of Lynwood. The Specific Plan is intended to guide
development to be more transit - oriented and promote healthy community design that involves
promoting more walking, bicycling, and public transit use.
Based on the information provided in the Draft Environmental Impact Report, Caltrans has the
following comments:
The traffic circulation outlined on pages 193 and 198 of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) are
adequate. However, the volume to capacity (V /C) ratio provided on Table 40 (page 203) is not
acceptable. If an existing State highway facility is operating at certain LOS, this should be
disclosed regardless of how many trips will be assigned as a result of the project. Additional
vehicle trips from the project or related projects may contribute significant impacts to the State
highway facility. Before concurring with the project and its associated mitigations along Long
Beach Boulevard and the 1 -105 on/off ramps, Caltrans would like to see the TIA study the
intersections based on current signal timing in addition to full build out of the Specific Plan.
Also, in addition to the transportation-related mitigation measures listed in the TIA, some
consideration should be given to the following:
1. Addressing the right -turn slip lanes that transition traffic from Fernwood Avenue to
Imperial Highway. As buffered bike lanes are proposed on Imperial Highway, there is an
opportunity to further enhance safety. The City might consider eliminating the right-turn
slip lane pockets if it is determined they do not provide any effective capacity benefits.
Alternatively, the City could explore retrofitting the right turn pockets by narrowing the
"Provide a safe, sustainable, inlegrated bad ej ldent transportation .sysirm
to enhance California's wonany and livability"
Mr. Bruno Naulls
August 12, 2016
Page 2
turning radii and widening the pedestrian island, or providing a raised crosswalks
connecting the sidewalk to the pedestrian island that will require right- turning vehicles to
slow down before they cross the proposed bike lane on Imperial Highway.
2. Explore opportunities to coordinate potential bikeway implementation and enhance the
area bicycle network beyond the Specific Plan boundaries. If bicycle infrastructure can
extend outside the Specific Plan boundaries, whether within the City of Lynwood or into
adjacent municipalities, it will serve a greater area and encourage more bicycling.
3. When implementing innovative bicycle infrastructure, the City should consult resources
such as the National Association of Transportation Officials' ( NACTO) Urban Bikeway
Design Guide, or Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Separated Bike Lane
Planning and Design Guide, to assist in the design process. Caltrans formally endorsed the
NACTO Guide in 2014 and the FHWA released its guide in 2015.
Caltrans is aware of challenges that the region faces in identifying viable solutions to alleviating
congestion on State and Local facilities. With limited room to expand vehicular capacity, it is
encouraging to see a Specific Plan and multi-modal mitigation measures that not only promote
active transportation and public transit, but also encourage better managing parking assets.
In the spirit of mutual cooperation, the Department invites the City and its consultant to contact
'this office to schedule a meeting in the near future to further discuss the traffic analysis. If you
have any questions or would like to discuss these comments, please feel free to contact me at (213)-
897 -9140 or dianna.watspn(aldot.ca.gov
/AKCI
DIANNA WATSON
IGR/CEQA Branch Chief
cc; Scott Morgan, State Clearinghouse
"Provide a safe, rnslainable, inlegrwed mad ofcfent Irmvponallon syst m
to enhance Call(omia's economy and livabdQv"
RESOLUTION NO. 3368
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD PLANNING
COMMISSION, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPT
THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND
ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
WHEREAS, the City applied for and was awarded a Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA or Metro) 2012 -2013 Round 3 Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) Planning Grant to prepare, and adopt the "Lynwood Transit
Area Specific Plan';
WHEREAS, since December 2014, City Staff and their consultants have worked
diligently meeting with community stakeholders, staff, elected officials, and conducting field
research compiling data in preparation of the Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2015 the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP)
and sent the NOP to the State Clearinghouse (SCH# 2015121020), who distributed the
document to State reviewing agencies for a 30 -day public review period from December 11,
2015 through January 11, 2016;
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2016, the City held a public scoping meeting regarding
the preparation of the EIR;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2016, the City of Lynwood Published the Draft Specific Plan
for public review, which envisioned future development of up to 3,500 residential units, up to
1.2 million square feet of commercial development, up to 350 hotel rooms, and up to
750,000 square feet of industrial development;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2016, the City and the Governor's Office of Planning and
Research distributed the Draft EIR, which identified and evaluated the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed Specific Plan and associated entitlements to
interested parties and responsible agencies (SCH #2015121020) for a 45 -day public review
period, July 1, 2016 through August 15, 2016;
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2016, a Notice of Availability for a Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) and EIR Community Meeting was published in the Los Angeles
Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation;
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2016, a public workshop was held to take comments on the
Draft EIR and Specific Plan. Following a presentation by the City and their consultants, all
members of the public in attendance were given the opportunity to comment on the Draft
EIR and Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, from July 26, 2016 through August 21, 2016 the City worked with the
consultants to prepare the Final EIR and Specific Plan. The Final EIR and Specific Plan
responds to the comments received on the Draft EIR and Specific Plan and proposes minor
text revisions;
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in a
newspaper of general and was mailed to all interested parties; and
WHEREAS, on August 30, 2016, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing on the Final EIR, Specific Plan, and associated General Plan Amendment
and reviewed and considered the agenda report, reviewed and considered written reports,
public testimony, and other information in the record.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES
HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND DECLARE, BASED UPON EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO
IT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Adoption of CEQA Findings.
The Lynwood Planning Commission considered the Environmental Impact Report for the
proposed Specific Plan and in doing so found that the project would not have significant
adverse environmental impacts, except in two resource categories (Noise and Traffic). In
compliance with Public Resources Code Section 12081 and California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15093, and as detailed in the Final EIR, changes
and alterations have been incorporated into the Specific Plan which avoid or substantially
lessen the significant environmental effect because feasible mitigation measures included in
the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be incorporated as conditions
of approval for future development. Nevertheless, the significant environmental effects
cannot be feasibly mitigated to a level of insignificance. In accordance with Public
Resources Code Section 21002 and 21002.2, the Planning Commission has determined
that there are specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of
the project which outweigh the significant effects on the environment and a statement of
overriding considerations has been prepared.
The Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. CEQA requires decision - makers to balance the benefits of a proposed project
against its unavoidable environmental impacts. If the benefits of a proposed project
outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be
considered "acceptable" by adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations. This
statement sets forth the project benefits or reasons why the Lead Agency, City of Lynwood,
is in favor of approving and weighs these benefits against the project's environmental
impacts identified in the Final EIR that cannot be mitigated to a level less than significant.
B. CEQA requires decision makers to adopt a mitigation monitoring and /or reporting
program (MMRP) for those mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR that would
mitigate or avoid each significant effect identified in the Final EIR, and to incorporate the
MMRP including all mitigation measures as part of all future development proposals within
the plan area. The Final EIR also includes an analysis of the extent to which the proposed
project's direct and indirect impacts will commit nonrenewable resources to uses that future
generations will probably be unable to reverse.
C. CEQA requires that the responses to comments in the Final EIR demonstrate
good faith and a well- reasoned analysis and may not be conclusory. In response to several
comments received, portions of the Draft EIR have been revised. Although new material
has been added to the Draft EIR through preparation of the Final EIR, this new material
provides clarification to points and information already included in the Draft EIR and is not
considered to be significant new information or a substantial change to the Draft EIR that
would necessitate recirculation.
D. The CEQA Guidelines state that "[t]he EIR is to inform other governmental
agencies and the public generally of the environmental impact of a proposed project' and
"CEQA does not require technical perfection in an EIR, but rather adequacy, completeness
and a good -faith effort at full disclosure." (14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15003(c) and (i).)
E. Comments received on the Draft EIR during the public review period show that a
number of citizens are concerned about traffic and circulation, parking, neighborhood
compatibility, and public safety. Public Agency comments were focused on the compatibility
of future transit oriented communities with existing transit facilities and potential traffic
impacts on the Long Beach Boulevard /1 -105 Freeway interchange. Therefore, the Final EIR
includes responses to comments responding to a large number of comments regarding
public safety concerns and individual responses to technical comments raised by public
agencies.
F. The documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings
upon which this decision is based are in the custody of the City Clerk of the City of Lynwood
and shall be located at City Hall.
G. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council certify the Final EIR
prepared for the Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan.
Section 2. Adoption of Findings Addressing the Issues Analyzed in the Final EIR.
The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Final EIR for the Lynwood Transit
Area Specific Plan identifies and discloses project- specific impacts and cumulative project
impacts. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR, findings, and facts in support of
findings are herein incorporated as Findings Required by CEQA, and are as follows:
A. The Final EIR identifies project -level impacts determined to be significant and
mitigable to a less than significant level. They include:
1. AIR QUALITY
Sianificant Impact
The proposed Specific Plan would increase traffic along all studied roadway
segments; however, increased traffic would not result in the creation of carbon
monoxide (CO) hotspots. The Specific Plan does not envision siting sensitive
receptors near sources of toxic air contaminants. However, locating residential
uses near transit services in the City of Lynwood may involve locating some
residential dwellings near the 1 -105 Freeway and other major transportation
corridors. Therefore, impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to
pollutant concentrations would be potentially significant, but mitigable.
Finding: Pursuant to CEQA Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially
lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Final EIR Mitigation Measures
AQ -4(a) through AQ -4(e) would ensure that the proposed project does not
result in any significant impacts to air quality and public health related to the
construction of residential dwellings in proximity to the 1 -105 Freeway or other
major transportation corridors.
2. Public Services
Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would add
3,500 residential units and an estimated 15,549 residents to the Plan Area,
which would increase use of recreational facilities, contributing to their physical
deterioration, and the city's parkland deficiency. Impacts would be significant
but mitigable.
Finding: Pursuant to CEQA Section 15091(a)(1), mitigation measures have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially
lessen the environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Final EIR Mitigation
Measure PS -1 would ensure that the proposed project does not result in any
significant impacts on recreational facilities.
3. Utilities
Significant Impact: Full buildout of development included under the proposed
Specific Plan would generate an increased demand for water. The City would
be able to supply projected demand based on existing entitlements provided
that the proposed project incorporates conservation measures. Therefore,
impacts to water supply would be significant but mitigable.
Finding: Pursuant to CEQA Section 15091(a)(1), mitigation measures have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially
lessen the environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Final EIR Mitigation
Measure U -1 would ensure that the proposed project does not result in any
significant impacts on water availability.
B. Project -Level Impacts Determined to be Significant, Unavoidable and Mitigated to
the Maximum Feasible Extent
The Final EIR identifies project -level impacts in the resource area of Operational
Noise and Traffic that cannot be fully mitigated and are therefore considered unavoidable.
To the extent the impacts remain significant and unavoidable, such an impact is acceptable
when weighed against the overriding social, economic, legal, technical and other
considerations, including beneficial effects of the project, which are described in the
Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section 6.
1. OPERATIONAL NOISE
Significant Impact: Traffic generated by buildout of the proposed Specific Plan
would incrementally increase noise levels on roads in the Plan Area. The
increase of up to 0.2 dBA would exceed the FTA Significance of Changes in
Operational Roadway Noise Exposure thresholds. Compliance with the
standards required in the Lynwood General Plan and implementation of
Mitigation Measures N -3(a) through N -3(e) would reduce roadway noise
impacts to the maximum extent feasible. With mitigation, roadway noise
impacts to interior noise levels in residences would be reduced to a less than
significant level. However, roadway noise impacts to exterior noise levels
would be significant and unavoidable. In the event the proposed project is
approved despite these significant noise impacts, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations will be required to be adopted by the decision - makers.
Finding: Impacts from the project's operational noise impacts are reduced by
identified mitigation measures but cannot be mitigated to a less than
significant level. The Planning Commission finds that, to the extent the
impacts remain significant and unavoidable; such impacts are acceptable
when weighed against the overriding social, economic and other
considerations set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in
Section 6.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Final EIR Mitigation Measures
N -3(a) through N -3(e) is required to address traffic noise; however, this issue
will remain significant and unavoidable due to the existing level of noise along
the major roadway corridors fronting the anticipated future development areas.
The aforementioned mitigation measures indicate that the identified significant
effects of the project have been reduced or avoided to the extent feasible.
2. Transportation/Traffic
Significant Impact: The Specific Plan would increase traffic levels along road
segments under Existing Plus Project conditions and Future Year (2040) Plus
Project (2040) conditions. Based on project related vehicle trips added to the
roadway network, the project is anticipated to have significant impacts on the
Long Beach Boulevard roadway segment and would exceed the Los Angeles
County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) standards for four roadway
segments in the plan area. Impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
Finding: Impacts from the project's traffic impacts are reduced by identified
mitigation measures but cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level.
The Planning Commission finds that, to the extent the impacts remain
significant and unavoidable; such impacts are acceptable when weighed
against the overriding social, economic and other considerations set forth in
the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section 6.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Final EIR Mitigation Measures
T -1(a) through T -1(f) is required to address traffic and circulation impacts;
however, this issue will remain significant and unavoidable due to the existing
level of congestion along the major roadway corridors fronting the anticipated
future development areas. The aforementioned mitigation measures indicate
that the identified significant effects of the project have been reduced or
avoided to the extent feasible.
C. Cumulative Impacts Associated with the Project which Remain Potentially
Significant and Unavoidable.
The Final EIR concludes that all cumulative impacts associated with the project
would be less than significant without mitigation or less than significant after implementation
of the required mitigation measures. Significant and unavoidable traffic impacts would occur
during future year (2040) plus project conditions and thus are considered a significant and
unavoidable cumulative impact.
Section 3. Alternatives Analysis.
Based upon the testimony and other evidence received, and upon studies and
investigation made by the Planning Commission and on its behalf, the Planning
Commission further finds that the Final EIR analyzes a reasonable range of project
alternatives. The alternatives in the Final EIR are as follows:
A. No Project/No Development — This alternative assumes that the Specific Plan is
not adopted and that the Plan Area would retain its existing land use designations
according to the existing City of Lynwood General Plan. The existing growth
assumptions for the Plan Area would continue to apply. Since the adoption of the
City of Lynwood General Plan, little growth has occurred in the Plan Area.
Therefore, this alternative assumes that this pattern would continue and no future
growth beyond mere the replacement of existing commercial, residential, and
industrial uses would occur in the Plan Area. This alternative would fail to meet
any of the Project Applicant's stated objectives.
Objective 1: Promote Transit - Oriented Development Near the Metro Green Line
Station - Expand on the accessibility of the Green Line Station and the energy at
Plaza Mexico by creating a dynamic transit district with a distinctive identity - an
active and attractive hub where people come to live, shop, work and play.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Under this alternative,
limited transit - oriented development would take place within the plan area; it would
remain a mix of uncoordinated commercial, residential and industrial development
with minimal infrastructure improvements supporting transit services.
Objective 2: Allow for Flexibility in Land Uses - Provide a framework for approval of
incremental development projects on a single concept plan that offers defined
ranges of flexibility to accommodate market changes.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Future development
within the plan area would remain subject to the City's current zoning ordinance,
which does not provide an efficient framework for review of mixed -use transit
oriented communities.
Objective 3: Consolidate Uses and Create New Development Sites - Identify sites
most suitable for assembly and revitalization.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Under this alternative,
catalytic development sites would not be identified and the desired development
standards promoting transit - oriented communities would not be established, which
would limit future opportunities for revitalization.
Objective 4: Enhance Pedestrian Comfort and Safety - Increase facilities, add
connections, and multiply opportunities to safely and conveniently get around the
area on "complete" streets by foot, bike, and public transit.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Under this alternative,
the desired development standards promoting transit - oriented communities, multi -
modal transportation strategies, and pedestrian /bicycle and recreation
improvement strategies would not be established.
Objective 5: Enhance Recreational Opportunities- Increase landscaped areas,
parks, open space, and trails that are supportive of the public life of the
community. Facilitate security and well -being for the Specific Plan Area's
residents, employees, and visitors through increased activity, better walkability,
controls on cars and drivers, and better design and wayfinding.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Under this alternative,
the desired development standards promoting transit - oriented communities, the
expansion of open space and recreational uses, pedestrian and bicycle network
improvements, and multi -modal transportation strategies would not be established.
Objective 6: Improve and Facilitate Additional Housing - A variety of housing types
should be provided which are compatible with existing housing types and
neighborhoods within the community. A diverse mix of ownership and rental
housing, and market rate, affordable, and workforce housing should be
maintained.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Under this alternative,
the desired development standards promoting transit - oriented communities and
residential development compatible with the surrounding residential
neighborhoods would not be established.
Objective 7: Create a Sustainable Community - Ensure public health, safety and
welfare by providing and maintaining sustainable facilities to ensure a ba lance
between development and the environment. Continue to make certain that public
services and facilities adequately support new development.
The No Project Alternative would not meet this objective. Under this alternative,
the desired development standards promoting transit - oriented communities, multi -
modal transportation strategies designed to reduce GHG emissions, and low
impact development strategies for stormwater and drainage improvements would
not be established.
B. Buildout Under the Lona Beach Boulevard Specific Plan — This alternative would
include future buildout previously envisioned as part of the Long Beach Boulevard
Specific Plan ( LBBSP), and considers the buildout potential of only those portions
of the LBBSP currently located in the proposed Lynwood Transit Area Specific
Plan Area. Under this scenario, future development within Plaza Mexico and the
Long Beach Boulevard Corridor from Norton Avenue to Josephine Street would
occur within an area totaling approximately 75 acres. This alternative would
include development of up to 575 total residential units in the LBBSP Area
compared to 3,500 units with the Specific Plan, and 1,580,000 square feet of non-
residential development compared to 1,200,000 square feet under the Specific
Plan.
This alternative was evaluated for the same impact categories as the proposed
project and was found to have similar impacts to the proposed project, but
incrementally greater impacts to land use and planning concerns. This Alternative
would meet some of the project's stated objectives; however it would be to a lesser
extent than the proposed project.
Objective 1: Promote Transit - Oriented Development Near the Metro Green Line
Station - Expand on the accessibility of the Green Line Station and the energy at
Plaza Mexico by creating a dynamic transit district with a distinctive identity - an
active and attractive hub where people come to live, shop, work and play.
Under the LBBSP alternative, more limited opportunities for transit - oriented
residential development would take place within the plan area, particularly within
the Plaza Mexico area. Moreover, future revitalization opportunities within the
properties fronting Alameda Street and fronting Imperial Highway would not be
available under the LBBSP. The open space, mobility and parking /transportation
demand management strategies would also not be available under the LBBSP
alternative.
Objective 2: Allow for Flexibility in Land Uses - Provide a framework for approval of
incremental development projects on a single concept plan that offers defined
ranges of flexibility to accommodate market changes.
Under the LBBSP alternative, more limited opportunities for transit - oriented
residential development would take place within the plan area, particularly within
the Plaza Mexico area. The same level of land use flexibility would also not be
provided under the LBBSP alternative.
Objective 3: Consolidate Uses and Create New Development Sites - Identify sites
most suitable for assembly and revitalization.
Under the LBBSP alternative, a number of catalytic development sites would not
be identified and the desired development standards promoting transit - oriented
communities would not be established, which would limit future opportunities for
revitalization.
Objective 4: Enhance Pedestrian Comfort and Safety - Increase facilities, add
connections, and multiply opportunities to safely and conveniently get around the
area on "complete" streets by foot, bike, and public transit.
Under the LBBSP alternative, the project area is limited to areas immediately
adjacent to Long Beach Boulevard and thus it does not provide the desired
development standards promoting transit - oriented communities, multi -modal
transportation strategies, and pedestrian /bicycle and recreation improvement
strategies along key corridors such as Alameda Street, Imperial Highway,
Fernwood Avenue, State Street, etc.
Objective 5: Enhance Recreational Opportunities- Increase landscaped areas,
parks, open space, and trails that are supportive of the public life of the
community. Facilitate security and well -being for the Specific Plan Area's
residents, employees, and visitors through increased activity, better walkability,
controls on cars and drivers, and better design and wayfinding.
Under the LBBSP alternative, the desired development standards promoting
transit - oriented communities, the expansion of open space and recreational uses,
pedestrian and bicycle network improvements, and multi -modal transportation
strategies would be limited to properties along Long Beach Boulevard and thus
opportunities for safety improvements along Alameda Street, Imperial Highway,
Fernwood Avenue, and State Street would not materialize.
Objective 6: Improve and Facilitate Additional Housing - A variety of housing types
should be provided which are compatible with existing housing types and
neighborhoods within the community. A diverse mix of ownership and rental
housing, and market rate, affordable, and workforce housing should be
maintained.
Under the LBBSP alternative, the desired development standards promoting
transit - oriented communities and residential development compatible with the
surrounding residential neighborhoods would not be established
Objective 7: Create a Sustainable Community - Ensure public health, safety and
welfare by providing and maintaining sustainable facilities to ensure a balance
between development and the environment. Continue to make certain that public
services and facilities adequately support new development.
Under the LBBSP alternative, the desired development standards promoting
transit - oriented communities, multi -modal transportation strategies designed to
reduce GHG emissions, and low impact development strategies for stormwater
and drainage improvements would only be established for properties located
adjacent to Long Beach Boulevard.
The Planning Commission finds that the LBBSP Buildout Alternative will not meet
the project objectives to the same extent as the proposed project, and that the
preferred alternative provides a more desirable mix of commercial, residential,
industrial, and open space uses and a more aesthetically pleasing environment.
C. Lower Growth Alternative SCAG 2040 Buildout — This alternative would
accommodate the residential and job growth forecast for the City of Lynwood in
SCAG's 2016 RTP /SCS in the Plan Area. Under this scenario, future development
in the Plan Area would include 1,500 residential units and approximately 1,700
new jobs. Utilizing SCAG's square foot per job estimate of 511 square feet of
commercial square footage per employee (SCAG, 2001), the forecast 1,700 new
jobs equates to approximately 870,000 square feet of new commercial uses.
This alternative was evaluated for the same impact categories as the proposed
project and was found to have similar impacts to the proposed project; however
development would likely occur throughout the entire City of Lynwood and would
not be targeted towards properties located near existing transit services and
transit -rich corridors. This Alternative would meet the proposed project's stated
objectives; however it would be to a lesser extent than the proposed project.
Objective 1: Promote Transit - Oriented Development Near the Metro Green Line
Station - Expand on the accessibility of the Green Line Station and the energy at
Plaza Mexico by creating a dynamic transit district with a distinctive identity - an
active and attractive hub where people come to live, shop, work and play.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, more limited opportunities for transit -
oriented residential development would take place within the plan area, particularly
within the Plaza Mexico area as future development opportunities would be spread
throughout the City instead of targeted near transit services. Future revitalization
opportunities within the properties fronting Alameda Street and fronting Imperial
Highway would also be limited under the SCAG Alternative.
Objective 2: Allow for Flexibility in Land Uses - Provide a framework for approval of
incremental development projects on a single concept plan that offers defined
ranges of flexibility to accommodate market changes.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, individual projects would be reviewed
pursuant to the existing zoning ordinance and land use standards, which would
provide a more limited level of land use flexibility and limited opportunities for
mixed -use development near transit services.
Objective 3: Consolidate Uses and Create New Development Sites - Identify sites
most suitable for assembly and revitalization.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, a number of catalytic development
sites would not be identified and the desired development standards promoting
transit - oriented communities would not be established, which would limit future
opportunities for revitalization.
Objective 4: Enhance Pedestrian Comfort and Safety - Increase facilities, add
connections, and multiply opportunities to safely and conveniently get around the
area on "complete" streets by foot, bike, and public transit.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, development would likely occur
throughout the City and would not be targeted within transit -rich service areas. In
addition, it would not provide the desired development standards promoting transit -
oriented communities, multi -modal transportation strategies, and
pedestrian /bicycle and recreation improvement strategies along key corridors such
as Alameda Street, Imperial Highway, Fernwood Avenue, State Street, etc.
Objective 5: Enhance Recreational Opportunities- Increase landscaped areas,
parks, open space, and trails that are supportive of the public life of the
community. Facilitate security and well -being for the Specific Plan Area's
residents, employees, and visitors through increased activity, better walkability,
controls on cars and drivers, and better design and wayfinding.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, the desired development standards
promoting transit - oriented communities, the expansion of open space and
recreational uses, pedestrian and bicycle network improvements, and multi -modal
transportation strategies would not be available and development would be spread
throughout the City instead of within transit -rich service areas.
Objective 6: Improve and Facilitate Additional Housing - A variety of housing types
should be provided which are compatible with existing housing types and
neighborhoods within the community. A diverse mix of ownership and rental
housing, and market rate, affordable, and workforce housing should be
maintained.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, the desired development standards
promoting transit - oriented communities and residential development compatible
with the surrounding residential neighborhoods would not be established. Instead,
future growth would occur throughout the City under the City's current zoning
ordinance, which does not provide for as diverse a mix of housing.
Objective 7: Create a Sustainable Community - Ensure public health, safety and
welfare by providing and maintaining sustainable facilities to ensure a balance
between development and the environment. Continue to make certain that public
services and facilities adequately support new development.
Under the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative, the desired development standards
promoting transit - oriented communities, multi -modal transportation strategies
designed to reduce GHG emissions, and low impact development strategies for
stormwater and drainage improvements would not be established.
The Planning Commission finds that the SCAG 2040 Buildout Alternative will not
meet the project objectives to the same extent as the proposed project, and the
proposed project provides a more desirable and lower scale mix of commercial
retail uses and a more aesthetically pleasing environment.
D. The Preferred Alternative
This alternative is described in detail throughout the associated staff report and
Final EIR as the proposed project. The proposed project does reduce significant
impacts through the implementation of mitigation measures and meets the project
objectives described above. The Final EIR provides substantial evidence that the
proposed project will result in no significant impact to Aesthetics, Biological
Resources, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials, Land Use, Fire Protection Services, Sheriff Protection
Services, Recreation, Agricultural Resources, Mineral Resources, and Population
and Housing. With regard to the remaining environmental subject areas (Air
Quality, Public Services, and Utilities), any impacts posed by the proposed project
are less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures.
Operational noise and Traffic impacts were found to be significant and
unavoidable; however, they will be minimized to the extent feasible by Final EIR
Mitigation Measures N -3(a) through N -3(f), and T -1(a) through T -1 (f).
The Planning Commission finds that the range of alternatives studied in the EIR reflect a
reasonable attempt to identify and evaluate various types of alternatives that would
potentially be capable of reducing the Proposed Project's significant environmental effects,
while accomplishing most of the Project Objectives. The Planning Commission finds that
the alternatives analysis is sufficient to inform the Planning Commission, agencies, and the
public regarding the tradeoffs between the degree to which alternatives to the Proposed
Project could reduce environmental impacts and the corresponding degree to which the
alternatives would hinder the achievement of the Project Objectives.
The Planning Commission finds that the Proposed Project would satisfy the Project
Objectives. As set forth in Section 2(A) and (B) above, the Planning Commission has
adopted mitigation measures that avoid or reduce to the extent feasible the significant
environmental effects of the Proposed Project. As explained in Section 2(B), while these
mitigation measures will not mitigate all Project impacts to a less- than - significant level, they
will mitigate those impacts to a level that the Planning Commission finds is acceptable. The
Planning Commission finds the remaining alternatives infeasible for a number of reasons,
including that they would not meet most of the Project Objectives and would be inconsistent
with County planning policies. Accordingly, the Planning Commission has determined to
approve the Project instead of approving one of the remaining alternatives.
Section 4. General Findings.
Based upon the testimony and other evidence received, and upon studies and
investigation conducted for the project, the Planning Commission finds:
A. The Final EIR for this project is adequate, complete, and has been prepared in
accordance with CEQA.
B. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Final EIR in reaching
its conclusion.
C. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093, the EIR includes
a description of each potentially significant impact and rationale for finding that changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as detailed in Section 2.
D. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines
Section 15091, changes and alterations have been required and incorporated into the
Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan and EIR which avoids or substantially lessens the
significant environmental effect because feasible mitigation measures included in the
MMRP, Exhibit A to this resolution, are made conditions of approval for this project.
E. The Final EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis.
Section 5. Statement of Overriding Considerations.
Based upon the testimony and other evidence received, and upon studies and
investigation conducted for the project, the Planning Commission has determined that,
although EIR mitigation measures and conditions of approval imposed on the project will
provide substantial mitigation of the identified significant environmental project -level and
cumulative effects pertaining to Operational Noise and Traffic discussed in Section 2(B),
these environmental effects cannot be feasibly mitigated to a level of insignificance.
Consequently, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations has been prepared to substantiate the Planning Commission's
findings that these significant, unavoidable impacts are acceptable when balanced against
the specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological and other considerations and
community benefits afforded by the project.
SPECIFIC, OVERRIDING COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT THAT OUTWEIGH
THE SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT
A. Any one or a combination of these specific community benefits would outweigh the
unavoidable environmental impacts of the project.
I . The Specific Plan envisions future development of up to 3,500 dwelling units,
up to 1.2 million square feet of commercial development, up to 350 hotel
rooms, and approximately 750,000 square feet of industrial uses, which could
support up to 5,668 jobs. Considering the city's homeowner and rental vacancy
rates, it is anticipated that these housing units would support up to 3,415
households. The 5,668 new jobs and 3,415 new households, when added to
the number of jobs and households that existed in the city in 2012, would shift
the job -to- housing ratio from 0.62 to 0.82 jobs per household. This
improvement in the jobs -to- housing ratio would allow a higher percentage of
the city's residents to work locally, thereby supporting sustainable growth by
reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled between work and home.
Additionally, the mix of commercial and residential uses would encourage
complete neighborhoods where services are available close to where people
live.
2. The proposed land use plan, development standards and design guidelines
require clustered development patterns for residential and commercial uses
near transit services. The Specific Plan would ensure that mobility,
accessibility, travel safety, and reliability for people and goods would be
maximized. Furthermore, the Specific Plan is designed to create sustainable,
urban neighborhoods, focused on providing a blend of parks, strong
businesses, and transit - oriented housing and commercial services, as well as a
wide range of multi -modal transportation practices. Access and circulation
improvements are based on the "Complete Streets" concept to design the
street network to accommodate all users (pedestrians, bicycles, buses,
automobiles, and trucks) safely and efficiently.
3. Objective No. 5 of the proposed Specific Plan is to: "Enhance Recreational
Opportunities" by increasing landscaped areas, parks, open space, and trails
that support the public life of the community. Facilitate security and well -being
for the Specific Plan Area's residents, employees, and visitors through
increased activity, better walkability, controls on cars and drivers, and better
design and wayfinding. Improvements envisioned in the Open Space land use
designation shall primarily include: (1) the development of a central plaza within
the Town Center land use designation; (2) the development of a linear park
containing a shared bicycle /pedestrian pathway and other amenities along the
southern boundary of the Town Center land use designation that extends from
Long Beach Boulevard west to the intersection of Fernwood Avenue and
Imperial Highway; (3) the development of an approximately 3.4 acre
neighborhood park west of the Imperial Highway Fernwood intersection; and
(4) the development of a linear park containing shared bicycle /pedestrian
pathway and other amenities along the south side of Fernwood Avenue from its
intersection with Long Beach Boulevard east to Fir Street.
The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the environmental information
contained in the Final EIR (SCH # 2015121020) and determines that it is adequate and in
compliance with CEQA (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.). In compliance
with Public Resources Code Section 12081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the
Planning Commission has considered the project benefits as balanced against the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects and hereby determines that any of the
overriding considerations listed in the Statement of Overriding Considerations outweighs the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects; therefore, the Planning Commission determines
that the adverse environmental effects are considered acceptable.
Section 6. Recommendation.
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council certify the Final EIR for the
Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan, adopt the above Statement of Overriding
Consideration, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program "Exhibit A" and made a part
hereof.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 30TH day of August, 2016, by members of
the Planning Commission, voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Erika Ramirez
Interim Director, Department of Development,
Compliance and Enforcement Services
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Request to Approve the Minutes of the July 12th, 2016 regular meeting.
6. SWEARING IN OF SPEAKERS
(City Clerk or Designee)
7. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- Regarding Agenda Items Only
(With respect to speakers addressing items listed under the heading of public
hearing, you are asked to wait until the Chair formally opens the public
hearing and the item is called)
8. NON - AGENDA PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATION
(This time is reserved for members of the public to address the Planning
Commission relative to matters that are not on the agenda. No action may be
taken on non - agenda items unless authorized by law.)
9. PLANNING COMMISISON /PBIDB ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
(This section is designed for Commission Members to report on outside
meetings attended that pertain to the work of the Board.)
ELIZABETH BATTLE, COMMISSIONER
BILL YOUNGER, COMMISSIONER
ALEX LANDEROS, COMMISSIONER
KENNETH WEST, VICE CHAIR
JORGE CASANOVA, CHAIRPERSON
10. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
A. Request to consider Tentative Parcel Map 2016 -01 to subdivide one parcel's
air space to allow three (3) detached condominiums on property located at
3304 Cedar Avenue.
I. Open Public Hearing ( M S )
II. Staff Report Presentation
III. Public Testimony
IV. Discussion
V. Close Public Hearing
VI. Call for the question /vote ( M S )
with Public Resources Code Section 12081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the
Planning Commission has considered the project benefits as balanced against the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects and hereby determines that any of the
overriding considerations listed in the Statement of Overriding Considerations outweighs the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects; therefore, the Planning Commission determines
that the adverse environmental effects are considered acceptable.
Section 6. Recommendation.
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council certify the Final EIR for the
Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan, adopt the above Statement of Overriding
Consideration, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program "Exhibit A" and made a part
hereof.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 30TH day of August, 2016, by members of
the Planning Commission, voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Erika Ramirez
Interim Director, Department of Development,
Compliance and Enforcement Services
• . i•t.. a ••t .••. rv. r.. .• r :•
'Dl4CPARTMENT-OF TRANSPORTA-TIO-N-
DISTiuc'r 7- OFFICE OF REGIONAL PLANNING
100 S. MAIN STREET, MS 16
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
PHONE (213)897 -9140
FAX (213) 897 -1337
www.dotxmgav
August 12, 2016
Mr. Bruno Naulls
Community Development Associate
City of Lynwood, Comrunity Development
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Dear Mr. Naulls:
G"emot`sofficeof Planning &Research
AUG 12 2g16
STATECLEARM00USE
RE: Lynwood Transit Area Specific Plan
Vic. LA- 105 /PM 11,414
SCH # 2015121020
IGR TGS# 07 -LA- 2016 -00009
y
g y
Serlour Olnughr.
Serious drough!.
Help save rval¢r!
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the
environmental review process for the above referenced project. The project consists of a Specific
Plan covering 315 acre area in the City of Lynwood. The Specific Plan is intended to guide
development to be more transit - oriented and promote healthy community design that involves
promoting more walking, bicycling, and public transit use.
Based on the information provided in the Draft Environmental Impact Report, Caltrans has the
following continents:
The traffic circulation outlined on pages 193 and 198 of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) are
adequate. However, the volume to capacity (V /C) ratio provided on Table 40 (page 203) is not
acceptable. If an existing State highway facility is operating at certain LOS, this should be
disclosed regardless of how many trips will be assigned as a result of the project. Additional
vehicle hips from the project or related projects may contribute significant impacts to the State
highway facility. Before concurring with the project and its associated mitigations along Long
Beach Boulevard and the I -105 on/off ramps, Caltrans would like to see the TIA study the
intersections based on current signal timing in addition to full build out of the Specific Plan.
Also, in addition to the transportation- related mitigation measures listed in the TIA, some
consideration should be given to the following:
1. Addressing the right -turn slip lanes that transition traffic from Ferawood Avenue to
Imperial Highway. As buffered bike lanes are proposed on Imperial Highway, there is an
opportunity to further enhance safety. The City might consider eliminating the right -hum
slip lane pockets if it is determined they do not provide any effective capacity benefits.
Alternatively, the City could explore retrofitting the right turn pockets by narrowing the
"Provide a safe, mundnable, imegmlerl muf efJlclmv nun.rpa•lallar system
to enhance California i economy and livability"