Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout7.5.23 BOH Meeting Packeta,E W �'E40ERe'•;�9 Town of Brewster Board of Health :r mcq 2198 Main St., Brewster, MA 02631 =.. brhealth@brewster-ma.gov (508) 896-3701 111111111111M0 BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING AGENDA 2198 Main Street July 5, 2023 at 6:30PM Board of Health This meeting will be conducted in person at the date, time and location identified above. This means that at least a quorum of the members of the public body will attend the meeting in person and members of the public are welcome to attend in person as well. As Penny Holeman a courtesy only, access to the meeting is also being provided via remote means in accordance with applicable law. Please note that while an option for remote attendance and/or participation is being provided as a courtesy to the public, the meeting/hearing will not Kimberley Crocker be suspended or terminated if technological problems interrupt the virtual broadcast or affect remote attendance or participation, unless otherwise required by law. Members of the public with particular interest in any specific item on this agenda, which includes Pearson an applicant and its representatives, should make plans for in-person vs. virtual attendance accordingly. David Bennett Members of the public who wish to access the meeting may do so in the following manner: John Keith Phone: Call (301)715-8592 or (312)626-6799. Webinar ID: 820 4394 4509 Passcode: 979174 "9 To request to speak: Press and wait to be recognized. ZoomWebinar: https://usD2Web.zoom.us/i/82043944509?owd=MytpM2kvUExKbUlRSOhmMOlZb3dQZzO Abigail Archer Passcode: 979174 To request to speak: Tap Zoom "Raise Hand", then wait to be recognized. When required by law or allowed by the Chair, persons wishing to provide public comment or otherwise participate in the meeting, may do so by accessing the meeting remotely, as noted above. Additionally, the meeting will be broadcast live, in real time, via Live broadcast (Brewster Government TV Channel 18), Livestream (livestream.brewster-ma.gov) or Video recording (tv.brewster- ma.gov) Health Director 1. Call to Order Amy von Hone 2. Declaration of a Quorum Assistant Health 3. Recording Statement Director 4. Chairman's announcements 5. Citizen's forum: Members of the public may address the Board of Health on matters not on the meeting Sherrie McCullough agenda for a maximum 3-5 minutes at the Chair's discretion. Under Open Meeting Law, the Board of Health is unable to reply but may add items presented to a future agenda Senior Department 6. Pressure Dosing Educational Letter - update Assistant Tammi Mason 7, Consent Agenda: "48 Far Fields Road - Title 5 depth to cover variance 8. Discussion on Brewster I/A systems spreadsheet, flowchart, noncompliant properties A, B & C 9. Liaison Reports 10. Matters not reasonably anticipated by the Chair 11. Items for next agenda 12. Next meeting: July 19, 2023 13. Informational items: a. MA Title 5 Regulations, 7/7/23 Revision Final Title 5 Amendments Redline Strikeout (mass-gov) b. MA Watershed Permit Regulations 7/7/23 Final Watersbcd Permit Regulations Redline Strikeout mass. ov C. BOH opposition letter to USEPA - Proposed Machine Gun Range at Joint Base Cape Cod d. Dispatch newsletter f. The Living Building Challenge Red List g. Notice of I/A System noncompliance letters- 7 Thousand Oaks Drive, 160 Old Red Top Road & 300 Foster Road h. Massachusetts Opioid -related overdose deaths rose 2.5% percent in 2022 information i. Monthly report for Serenity of Brewster j. Monthly report for Maplewood at Brewster 14. Adjournment Date Posted: Date Revised: Received bi-Town Clerk: 6/29/23 \\fileserver]6\rdocuments$\tmason\Desktop\BOH new agenda.doex TOWN OF BREWSTER 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MA 02631 PHONE: (508) 896-3701 EXT 1120 FAx:(508)896-4538 BRHEALTH& B RE W S TER -MA. GO V WWW.BREWSTER-MA.GOV Received: 1.4t, I 2 3 Paid: * 75 CIS 7 ] Abutter Deadline:_ U 12o12--�> Date: June 6, 2023 RECEIVISO JUN 0 6 2023 BREWSTER HEALTH DEPARTMENT Application for Boar o ea ariances IRIn-House Local Upgrade Approval ❑Public Hearing SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, MA Map:65 LC Plan: Parcel : 45 Book: 35321 Page: 126 LC Certificate: Lot: 3 Name of Applicant: Bruce and Linda Sauter Mailing Address: 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, MA 02631 Telephone # 774.722.0105 Owner(s) of Record : same as above Mailing Address: same as above Design Engineer/Sanitarian: Laura Schofield, RS Email: bwsauteraas@comcast.net Mailing Address: PO Box 101 Orleans, MA 02653 Telephone #: 508.255.2098 Firm/Company Name: Schofield Brothers of Cape Cod Email address: schobro@capecod.net Signature::I I r�� (%I), j WC Applicant or Engineer New Construction ❑ Voluntary Upgrade RAddition/Alteration ❑ Failed system ❑Real Estate Transfer ❑ Design flow of existing system: 440 gpd Reason for failure: hydraulically overloaded leach pit454 Design flow of proposed system: 440 gpd Total sewage flow of site: 440 gpd Total lot size (sf): 31,219 sq ft Conservation Commission approval required: yes ❑ no ❑ Order of Conditions/Det. Of Applicability attached ❑ Date of ConCom hearing: X3%3 List of all Variances from State and Local codes Tadd sheets if needed] TITLE 5 Sec. #: Description of Variance(s) 15.405(1)(b) Local Upgrade approval is requested to allow an increase in the maximum allowable depth of system components required by 310 CMR 15.221(7) from 36" to 50+/-" max. over the leaching area and distribution box. I Brewster Rea. #: I Description of Variance(s) I Approved by: Health Department N:\Health\BOH regs\InHouse Septic Local Upgrade Approval 2019\Varianceapplication FINAL NONFILLABLE FORM 12.18.19.docx cfl N r N CU a N M LO co Y 0 0 m a� m M June 29, 2023 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT, 1120 FAX: 508 896.4538 .. 11 a,itz?C L}iril.::t1:'t'nYii.eU'. WW W.BREWSTER-MA.GOV Health Department Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Notice of Board of Health Variance Approval/Deed Restriction Mr. & Mrs. Bruce and Linda Sauter — Applicant 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, MA 02631 RE: 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, MA Assessors Map: 65 Parcel: 45 Deed Reference Book: 35321 Page: 126 Lot: 3 Plan Reference Book: 451 Page: 2-5 Owner of Record: Bruce W. and Linda L. Sauter, Trustees, Sauter Family Trust Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sauter: On June 29, 2023, the Brewster Health Department reviewed and approved the following variances for the septic system upgrade at the above referenced address per engineered plans by Schofield Brothers of Cape Cod, dated June 5, 2023. Title 5: 310 CMR 15.221(7) Maximum Cover a. Variance request to allow Soil Absorption System and Distribution Box to be installed up to 50" below finished grade. A variance of 14" (Soil Absorption System) and 14" (Distribution Box) are granted. Town of Brewster: None In granting the above variance, the Health Department imposes the following Order of Conditions: 1. Any additional flow above the existing 4 Bedroom capacity to the residential structure will require further review by the Board of Health. 2. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance, this Variance Approval Letter must be properly recorded at -the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds and a recorded copy of same shall be furnished to the Brewster Health Department as proof of the recording. 3. Variances shall expire within one (1) year of the date of this approval. Please feel free to contact me if you have any comments or questions on the above. I can be reached at the Health Department, 508-896-3701, ext. 1120. Sincerely, w &_grl Aryl L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Hh Director cc: Schofield Brothers of Cape Cod, PO Box 101, Orleans, MA. 02653 File N:\Health\BOH Decision Letters\Septic Variance In -House Decisions\Title 5 Brewster Approvals\48 Far Fields Road InHouseApproval Deed Restriction 06.29.2023.doc SCHOFIELD BROTHERS OF CAPE Land Surveying & Environmental Pe 161 Cranberry Highway P.O. Box 101 Orleans, MA 02653-0101 508-255-2098 - 508-240-1215 (fax) E-mail: schobro@capecod.net June 6, 2023 Brewster Board of Health 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02 Attn: Amy Von Hone RE: 48 Far Fields Road Dear Ms. Von Hone; E CEIVED JUN 0 6 2023 BREWSIT!g�H TH I)LRRF,TMENT Enclosed please find the following with respect to a septic system upgrade requiring a local upgrade approval from Title 5, the State Environmental Code, at the above referenced address: • Town of Brewster Application for Board of Health Variances Form • Filing Fee in the amount of $75.00 • Floor Plan of Existing Dwelling • Three copies Septic System Design Plan entitled "Proposed Sewage Disposal System for an Existing Four Bedroom Dwelling at 48 Far Fields Road in Brewster, Massachusetts" The subject property is a 31,219+/- square foot lot located westerly of Far Fields Road. A four bedroom dwelling built in 1967 exists on the site. The dwelling is currently served by a 1,000 gallon septic tank and single leaching pit. The system was recently inspected and failed, triggering the upgrade to the septic system. The proposed septic system is consists of the existing 1,000 gallon septic tank, a distribution box and a soil absorption system comprised of leaching galleys in a trench configuration. A Local upgrade approval is requested pursuant to Title V, the State Environmental Code, as follows: 15.405(1)(b) An increase in the maximum allowable depth of system components required by 310 CMR 15.221(7) from 36" to 50"max for the leaching area and distribution box. To comply with the Title V conditions applicable to this request, the leaching area components and d -box will be rated for 14-20 loading. The leaching area will be vented. An access cover to the leaching area and the d -box cover will be brought to within 6 inches of final grade to provide access to the system for inspection and maintenance. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have questions or concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, Schofield Brothers of Cape Cod Laura Schofield, RS, SE Project Manager cc: Bruce Sauter Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 0263 1-1 898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 bnc�aith u Brewster -ma. ( y _... __._._._._........._.___.._.__..._........__.........g __._ W W W.BREW STER-MA.GOV AGENDA ACTION ITEM FORM BOH Variance Agenda Item ❑ In -House Local Upgrade Approval Other: ❑■ Health Department Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Board of Health Meeting Date: July 5, 2023, Consent Agenda Project Location: 48 Far Fields Road Assessors' Map & Parcel: 65/45 Owner's Name & Address: Bruce W. and Linda L. Sauter, Trustees, Sauter Family Trust 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, MA 02631 Applicant: same as owner Date Requested: June 6, 2023 Title 5 Variance Request: Yes Z No ❑ Board of Health Variance Request: Yes ❑ No Z Other: Yes ❑ No ❑ 1. Property lies outside Zone Il and outside the District of Critical Planning (DCPC) 2. Property lies inside an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) — wetlands on property 3. Town Water 4. Upgrade of existing Title 5 system due to failed inspection Health Director's Comments: Approve with following comments and conditions 1. The existing 31,219 SF residential property consists of an existing 3 bedroom dwelling serviced by town water and a Title 5 septic system installed in 1997 approved for a four bedroom total capacity flow, consisting of a 1000 -gallon Septic Tank, a D -box, and one (1) 6' X 6' Leach Pit. The applicant proposes to upgrade the system to a Maximum Feasible Compliant Title 5 septic system. The proposed septic system will consist of the existing 1000 -gallon Septic Tank, a new three (3) outlet H-20 Distribution Box, and three (3) 500 -gallon H-20 Leach Chambers with four feet of stone. The system will be vented. Total daily flow provided will be 454.3 gallons per day. N:\Health\BOH Meeting Notes\BOH Hearing Notes\48 Far Fields Road M 65 P 45 Agenda.Variance Action Item Form 06.29.2023.docx 2. Due to lot constraints including the requirement to maintain a minimum 100' from the existing wetland located in the northwesterly corner of the property, the Distribution Box and the Soil Absorption System will be greater than 3' below the final grade. 3. The following variances are requested: Title 5: a. 310 CMR 15.221(7) (Maximum Cover); Soil Absorption System and Distribution Box to be installed 36" up to 50" below finished grade. Town of Brewster: none 4. Approval with the following conditions: Approve the septic variance as requested above with the following conditions: i. Any future additional flow to the residential structure beyond the existing grandfathered 4 bedroom capacity will need further BOH review. A copy of the BOH Approval Letter must be recorded at the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance upon completion of the septic system installation. A copy of the recorded letter to be placed on file at the BOH. ii. Variance will expire one (1) year from the date of the BOH Approval. a. N:1Health\BOH Meeting Notes\BOH Hearing Notes148 Far Fields Road M 65 P 45 Agenda.Variance Action Item Form 06.29.2023.doex Sauter — 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, Massachusetts 02631 (Basement) UNFINISHED BASEMENT AREA FINISHED BASEMENT AREA Septic System Basement Discharge Point 17 ..` Window 11 1� .5 I Window 14.5 lln� 23 32 Z� %L(/P Exterior Door/Stairs C � Furnace & Window Hot Water Heater 0° Window 26 O 13 0 14 28 Electrical Junction Box CAN connection 16 17 Master 15 Bedroom Closet 32 Master Bathroom 18 26 Attached Garage 24 Sauter — 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, Massachusetts 02631 (First floor) 13.5 TREX SIMULATED WOOD DECK 1 3.5 14.5 18 46 2:3 Kitchen Eating sunroom / Living Room Area 3 2 $ 2 ao � LaundryBedroo n 2 3 Dining 14 28 Room 1 Bathroom 6 Covered Porch Bedroo0 1� TOWN OF BREWSTER, MA BOARD OF ASSESSORS 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 Abutters List Within 65 feet of Parcel 65/45/0 Certified by: /arses M. Gallagher, MAA Deputy Assessor Key Parcel ID Owner Location Mailing Street _ MailIES Ck _ ST_ Z(Cd/Country_ 12764 65-28-0-R NICHOLSON JAMES ETAL TRUSTEES 0 FAR FIELDS ROAD C/O MEG MORRIS BREWSTER MA 02631 (26-999) FAR FIELDS COMMON TRUST 3 141 FAR FIELDS ROAD 3167 65-29-0-R BELLAVANCE JOHN E TRUSTEE & 51 FAR FIELDS ROAD 51 FAR FIELDS ROAD BREWSTER MA 02631 (26-155) BELLAVANCE WENDY A TRUSTEE 3151 65-45-0-R SAUTER BRUCE W & LINDA L TRUSTEES 48 FAR FIELDS ROAD 48 FAR FIELDS ROAD BREWSTER MA 02631 (26-139) SAUTER FAMILY TRUST 3150 65-46-0-R MOAN WILLIAM F JR & DOREEN A TRUSTE 28 FAR FIELDS ROAD 28 FAR FIELDS ROAD BREWSTER MA 02631 (26-138) MOAN TRUST 3094 65.48-0-R FRIEND DONALD & ALVES MELISSA 720 TUBMAN ROAD 720 TUBMAN ROAD BREWSTER MA 02631 (26-88) 3149 65-49-0-R HERSEY RICHARD K TRUSTEE & 700 TUBMAN ROAD 700 TUBMAN ROAD BREWSTER MA 02631 (26-137) HERSEY LUCY C TRUSTEE 5/25/2023 Page L CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED BREWSTER IN-HOUSE SEPTIC LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVAL NOTICE: Date: June 6, 2023 Re: 48 Far Fields Road Brewster, MA Subject Address Dear Abutter: Map: 65 Lot: 4 5 Please be advised that an application for septic local upgrade approvals from the regulations of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Title 5 and/or the Town of Brewster Regulations for Subsurface Disposal of Sewage, has been submitted to the Brewster Health Department for approval. The following variances are requested: List of all variances from State and Town Codes Title 5, Sec # Description of Variance(s) Local Upgrade approval is requested to allow an increase in the maximum allowable depth of system components required by 310 CMR 15.221(7) from 36" to 50+/-" max. over the leaching area and distribution box. Brewster Rea. # The application and plans are available for review and comment at the Brewster Health Department, Brewster Town Offices, 2198 Main Street Brewster, Monday through Friday (excluding holidays) from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Applicant/Representative CC: Brewster Health Department N:\Health\BOH regs\InHouse Septic Local Upgrade Approval 2019\inhousevarianceabutternotification NONFILLABLE FORM 12.11.19.docx FRIEND DONALD & ALVES MELISSA 720 TUBMAN ROAD n n Domestic a a MIME Br 1 j2f o �-WIQ y- CertHied Mail Fee $4.15 T $ Extra Servico & Fees icheck bw, edd 7 ❑Return Receipt thsrdooW S. 0 ❑ Return Receipt(eleotrordo) S. :3 CCertltied Melt FlwW WDelvery $ zi ❑AdultSiWmWreRequlred $. :3 [] Adutt3"aui a Restricted De4hrery $ r1 Postage ri u u tti n C0 CD n n C3 C3 C3 M M M ru ru C3 r - Ln m co co �-WIQ Mail Fee #/ 1 $ Ex." SeiMoes & Fees (check Aox. E 0 ] RoKm Flempt Nvd-W C3 0 C Rohn PweW ie18 tft) Cn C3 C C.a tiP,ed Melfi Reshlctetl Delivery AdOt 5tgnattae RegdrW Adult SreReceDn yaevry rn PostageG.ti m '7 M To r N $ ni s NICHOLSON JAMES ETAL TRUE ------------ E3 FAR FIELDS COMMON TRUST 3 C/O MEG MORRIS -•---------- 141 FAR FIELDS ROAD MOAN WILLIAM F JR & DOREEN A MOAN TRUST 28 FAR FIELDS ROAD BREWSTER, MA 02631 Amy von Hone From: William Grafton Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 7:59 PM To: Amy von Hone Subject: RE: wetland delineation approval - 48 Far Fields Road Attachments: septic system plan 48 far fields rd brewster.pdf Amy, the Commission reviewed the attached site plan which is signed and stamped. They did not vote on the wetland but did not require a conservation permit either for the septic system which is located beyond the 100 -foot buffer of the delineated wetlands. In general, a conservation permit is needed for the Commission to provide an approved wetland delineation. Thus, although the wetland line is not approved, the septic work will not merit the need for a conservation permit. Therefore, so long as the work does not go inside the 100 -foot buffer of the wetlands delineated on the attached site plan, there is no need for further Conservation review. Respectfully, Bill Grafton Brewster Conservation Administrator 1657 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 Phone (508) 896-4546 ext. 4242 Brewster Town Offices are open to the public Monday through Thursday from 8:30 to 4:OOpm, and by appointment on Fridays. For the latest updates on Town services, please visit www.brewster-ma.ov From: Amy von Hone <avonhone@brewster-ma.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 4:52 PM To: William Grafton <wgrafton@brewster-ma.gov> Subject: wetland delineation approval - 48 Far Fields Road Hi Bill - We have a septic variance pending approval at this property and want to confirm that ConsCom is all set with the wetland delineation. Thanks, Amy Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Brewster Health Director Brewster Health Department 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 (0) 508.896.3701 X1120 (F) 508.896.4538 Permit valid for REPAIR OF SEPTIC SYSTEM ONLY, due to State and 1�1 rePtle rarlances. (bard of Health review Rod approval Is r,equ ad for n truture a d itio ngrenoralionslaltentians to sewage faF, firewater Health Department EDGE OF ISOLATED SHRUB SWAMP 1 1 WF i i WF s FG= EXISTING FG= �evrensic I •z: o. m'.. D INV. EXISTING •� 12'-+ a: TWIN 4" F G PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1 in. = 20 ft. ASSESSOR'S MAP 65 PARCEL 45 LOT AREA: 31219 SQ.FT.t A LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVAL IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO TITLE V, THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE, AS FOLLOWS: 15.405(1)(B) AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEPTH OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS REQUIRED BY 310 CMR 15.221(7) FROM 36" TO 50"t MAXIMUM FOR THE D -BOX AND LEACHING AREA. FT5V WF WF/ fi EXISTING / In I 4 BEDROOM l 00 00 DWELLING I L II f I 1 1 J 100' FROM EDGE ./ BENCHMARK: GARAGE SHE p0 OF SHRUB SWAMP I Z_ EL -100.8 FLOOR DOOR A D r 7 EXISTING SEPTIC 10 i / L J / 'TANK TO REMAIN EROSION -� �_� I I Old ONTROL wi PAVEDON 0 / DRIVEWAY / :..� REMOVE WALL" OVER SEPTIC TANK- _ 1 L' - � 6" TREE`.. .1, 1 T N 101X �-�,.-� HYDRANT T 5' OMIT OF .-- /10 EXCAVATION��OC PROFILE OF SYSTEM - NO SCALE PROVIDE 20" MIN. DIA. WATERTIGHT ACCESS MANHOLE AND 3" MIN. COVER CONSTRUCTED OF DURABLE MATERIAL BROUGHT TO AIR SPACE WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE DF =att� 1H EXISTING FG- �-t00x6t Via' " Plll FG- SEE PLAN INV - 96 7 '1l1"••• 6" OF v%o oop�ovyao��oaoetlptb e�a�°�,�p B�oNW00 g EXISTING SEPTIC TANK (H-10g°oao'o� CAPACITY = 1000 GALLONS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE NOTE: ALL PIPE TO BE 4" DIAM. PVC TIGHT JOINT SCH. 40 (EXISTING) 2..: INV. _ 96.17 NV. = 6" 96.34 ooBliowo$ 12' f- 36 MAX - DISTRIBUTION BOX (H-20) 3 OUTLETS INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL 8 OUTLETS TO BE THE SAME UNUSED OUTLETS SHALL BE PLUGGED WITH HYDRAULIC CEMENT OUTLET PIPES SHALL BE LEVEL FOR AT LEAST TWO FEET 4' - 4.8'. 4' 12.8' USE (3) SHOREY PRECAST 500 GALLON LEACHING DRYWELLS (H-20) OR APPROVED EQUAL -2" LAYER OF 1/8' - 3/8" DOUBLE WASHED � 3/4" - 1.5" DOUBLE WASHE( STONE - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t \\ di # 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t JOB: 0-12639 PERFORMED BY: LAURA A SCHOFIELD, RS,SE I WITNESSED BY: S. MCCULLOUGH, BREWSTER BOH L::[6"MIN. I SOIL ry 6" MIN. SOIL x,98 I (Fr) 3"MAX. a PROVIDE TEE FLOW LINE GAS BAFFLE S MOTTLING INLET OUTLET •r 6" OF v%o oop�ovyao��oaoetlptb e�a�°�,�p B�oNW00 g EXISTING SEPTIC TANK (H-10g°oao'o� CAPACITY = 1000 GALLONS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE NOTE: ALL PIPE TO BE 4" DIAM. PVC TIGHT JOINT SCH. 40 (EXISTING) 2..: INV. _ 96.17 NV. = 6" 96.34 ooBliowo$ 12' f- 36 MAX - DISTRIBUTION BOX (H-20) 3 OUTLETS INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL 8 OUTLETS TO BE THE SAME UNUSED OUTLETS SHALL BE PLUGGED WITH HYDRAULIC CEMENT OUTLET PIPES SHALL BE LEVEL FOR AT LEAST TWO FEET 4' - 4.8'. 4' 12.8' USE (3) SHOREY PRECAST 500 GALLON LEACHING DRYWELLS (H-20) OR APPROVED EQUAL -2" LAYER OF 1/8' - 3/8" DOUBLE WASHED � 3/4" - 1.5" DOUBLE WASHE( STONE - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t \\ di # 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t JOB: 0-12639 PERFORMED BY: LAURA A SCHOFIELD, RS,SE I WITNESSED BY: S. MCCULLOUGH, BREWSTER BOH O I SOIL ry I SOIL x,98 I (Fr) SURFACE (IN) HORIZON I (USDA) U) �I MOTTLING 0 I I 0-8 A SANDY LOAM W I MASSIVE. FRIABLE 100.4-99.3 8-22 LL_ I I I � I i I Q I CI LL I I I 00 I I 93.3-87.8 94-160 I I I I I 2% MIN. GRADE OVER SYSTEM I I I I I I I I I a�. DEEP TEST HOLE OBSERVATION LOG #2 di # DATE: MARCH 2, 2023 JOB: 0-12639 PERFORMED BY: LAURA A SCHOFIELD, RS,SE I WITNESSED BY: S. MCCULLOUGH, BREWSTER BOH ELEVATION DEPTH FROM SOIL SOIL TEXTURE SOIL COLOR SOIL ACCESS MANHOLE AND COVER (Fr) SURFACE (IN) HORIZON I (USDA) -UG- (MUNSELL) MOTTLING FG OTHER 101.1-100.4 0-8 A SANDY LOAM 10YR4/3 - MASSIVE. FRIABLE 100.4-99.3 8-22 Bw SANDY LOAM 10185/6 - MASSIVE. FRIABLE 99.3-93.3 22-94 CI SANDY LOAM 10YR5/4 - MASSIVE, FIRM. 93.3-87.8 94-160 C2 SAND. MED- 2% MIN. GRADE OVER SYSTEM 10YR6/6 - SCR, LOOSE COARSE FOR: AN EXISTING 4 BEDROOM DWELLING � CLEAN �ACKFILL RFAK AT: 48 FAR FIELDS ROAD 'VARIABLE WITHIN INV. = 96.00 n OUT HORIZON PARENT GEOLOGICAL MATERIAL GLACIAL OUTWASH STANDING WATER IN HOLE: NO WEEPING FROM FACE: NO DEPTH TO BEDROCK: ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER = BELOW ELEV 87.8 PERCOLATION TEST: C2 HORIZON TOO DEEP TO SAFELY PERC. ASSUME < 2 MPI & CONFIRM AT INSTALL SUPPORT POLES, 2" X 2" STAKES DRIVEN 1-1/2' TO 2' INTO GROUND FILTER FABRIC Fes. NATURAL TAMPED "L"I ANCHOR SOIL 6" TRENCH FOR SILT FENCE USE ENVIROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL BY RECOMMENDED TOE -IN TRENCH METHOD. SILT FENCE SEDIMENT BARRIER DETAIL (NO SCALE) LEGEND PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE ---XX--- EXISTING CONTOUR © EXISTING LEACHING PIT -W WATER LINE 000 EXISTING 1,000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK El PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION BOX o e PROPOSED LEACHING AREA LOCUS MAP p%D RD40 cTi � `;K 4 T m SCALE: 1 IN. = 2000 FT. GENERAL NOTES 1. ELEVATIONS REFER TO AN ASSUMED DATUM. SEE PLAN FOR BENCHMARK. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO TITLE 5 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWN OF BREWSTER. 3. ANY CHANGES TO THIS PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF HEALTH AND SCHOFIELD BROTHERS OF CAPE COD. 4. FOR PROPER PERFORMANCE, THE SEPTIC TANK SHOULD BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR. THE TANK SHOULD BE PUMPED WHEN THE TOTAL DEPTH OF SCUM AND SOLIDS EXCEEDS 1/3 OF ITS LIQUID DEPTH. 5. SCHOFIELD BROTHERS OF CAPE COD DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION. 6. ALL UNSUITABLE OR DELETERIOUS MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED MUST BE EXCAVATED AND REMOVED TO A DISTANCE OF 5 FEET FROM ALL SIDES OF THE SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (S.A.S) AND TO AN ELEVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 93.0. BACKFILL WITH CLEAN SAND MATERIAL MEETING TITLE 5 SPECIFICATIONS TO APPROX. ELEVATION 96.5. CONTACT SCHOFIELD BROTHERS IF ANY DOUBT OR QUESTIONS ARISE REGARDING SOIL QUALITY. 7. INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT SCHOFIELD BROTHERS FOR EXCAVATION INSPECTION, CONFIRMATORY PERC TEST AND PRIOR TO BACKFILLING FOR SYSTEM CERTIFICATION. 8. EXISTING LEACH PIT IS TO BE PUMPED, ABANDONED AND REMOVED ALONG WITH ADJACENT CONTAMINATED MATERIAL. 9. EXISTING SEPTIC TANK OUTLET INVERT SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO COMPONENT INSTALLATION. CONTACT SCHOFIELD BROTHERS IF SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES EXIST. 10. SITE RESTORATION REQUIRES ALL STRIPPED TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL TO BE STOCKPILED AND REUSED AT OWNERS OPTION. RE -SPREAD OVER DISTURBED AREAS TO PROMOTE OPTIMAL GROWTH. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE LOAMED AND SEEDED UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION. 11. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. ANY COMPONENT THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO VEHICLE _ OR OTHER HEAVY EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH H-20 LOADING CAPACITY. 12. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 13. NO KNOWN WELLS EXIST WITHIN 200' OF THE PROPOSED LEACHING AREA EXCEPT THOSE THAT ARE SHOWN. DESIGN CALCULATIONS 1. ESTIMATED HYDRAULIC LOADING: FOUR BEDROOMS AT 110 GPD PER BEDROOM = 440 GPD GARBAGE GRINDER IS NOT ALLOWED WITH THIS DESIGN 2. SEPTIC TANK SIZE: AVERAGE DAILY FLOW = 440 GPD X 2 DAYS = 880 GALLONS SEPTIC TANK PROVIDED = 1,000 GALLONS (EXISTING TANK TO REMAIN) 3. DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE _ < 2 MINUTES PER INCH SOIL TEXTURE SANDS, CLASS 310 CMR 15.242 EFFLUENT LOADING RATE = 0.74 GPD/SF 4. LEACHING AREA: TOTAL SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED = 185.2 SF X 0.74 GPD/SF X7.0 GPD TOTAL BOTTOM AREA PROVIDED = 428.8 SF X 0.74 GPD/SF = 3173 GPD MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADING UNDER TITLE 5 = 43-47 GPD ACTUAL HYDRAULIC LOADING = 440 GPD (SEE 1.) DESIGNED LEACHING AREA EXCEEDS LEACHING AREA REQUIRED UNDER BOTH TITLE 5 AND THE TOWN OF BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH REGULATIONS di # EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS SECTION TEST HOLE LOCATIONS p00 OF R4S IE PROPERTY LINE ROBERT c5c PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ACCESS MANHOLE AND COVER JOHN -OH- OVERHEAD UTILITIES FREEMAN N+I+ -UG- UNDERGROUND UTILITIES No. 32655 FG FINISHED GRADE P rss1�� UP UTILITY POLE 'YO cuavE'lOP TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVA LOCUS MAP p%D RD40 cTi � `;K 4 T m SCALE: 1 IN. = 2000 FT. GENERAL NOTES 1. ELEVATIONS REFER TO AN ASSUMED DATUM. SEE PLAN FOR BENCHMARK. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS TO CONFORM TO TITLE 5 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWN OF BREWSTER. 3. ANY CHANGES TO THIS PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF HEALTH AND SCHOFIELD BROTHERS OF CAPE COD. 4. FOR PROPER PERFORMANCE, THE SEPTIC TANK SHOULD BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR. THE TANK SHOULD BE PUMPED WHEN THE TOTAL DEPTH OF SCUM AND SOLIDS EXCEEDS 1/3 OF ITS LIQUID DEPTH. 5. SCHOFIELD BROTHERS OF CAPE COD DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION. 6. ALL UNSUITABLE OR DELETERIOUS MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED MUST BE EXCAVATED AND REMOVED TO A DISTANCE OF 5 FEET FROM ALL SIDES OF THE SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (S.A.S) AND TO AN ELEVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 93.0. BACKFILL WITH CLEAN SAND MATERIAL MEETING TITLE 5 SPECIFICATIONS TO APPROX. ELEVATION 96.5. CONTACT SCHOFIELD BROTHERS IF ANY DOUBT OR QUESTIONS ARISE REGARDING SOIL QUALITY. 7. INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT SCHOFIELD BROTHERS FOR EXCAVATION INSPECTION, CONFIRMATORY PERC TEST AND PRIOR TO BACKFILLING FOR SYSTEM CERTIFICATION. 8. EXISTING LEACH PIT IS TO BE PUMPED, ABANDONED AND REMOVED ALONG WITH ADJACENT CONTAMINATED MATERIAL. 9. EXISTING SEPTIC TANK OUTLET INVERT SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO COMPONENT INSTALLATION. CONTACT SCHOFIELD BROTHERS IF SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES EXIST. 10. SITE RESTORATION REQUIRES ALL STRIPPED TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL TO BE STOCKPILED AND REUSED AT OWNERS OPTION. RE -SPREAD OVER DISTURBED AREAS TO PROMOTE OPTIMAL GROWTH. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE LOAMED AND SEEDED UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION. 11. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS ARE DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM H-20 LOADING. ANY COMPONENT THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO VEHICLE _ OR OTHER HEAVY EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH H-20 LOADING CAPACITY. 12. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 13. NO KNOWN WELLS EXIST WITHIN 200' OF THE PROPOSED LEACHING AREA EXCEPT THOSE THAT ARE SHOWN. DESIGN CALCULATIONS 1. ESTIMATED HYDRAULIC LOADING: FOUR BEDROOMS AT 110 GPD PER BEDROOM = 440 GPD GARBAGE GRINDER IS NOT ALLOWED WITH THIS DESIGN 2. SEPTIC TANK SIZE: AVERAGE DAILY FLOW = 440 GPD X 2 DAYS = 880 GALLONS SEPTIC TANK PROVIDED = 1,000 GALLONS (EXISTING TANK TO REMAIN) 3. DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE _ < 2 MINUTES PER INCH SOIL TEXTURE SANDS, CLASS 310 CMR 15.242 EFFLUENT LOADING RATE = 0.74 GPD/SF 4. LEACHING AREA: TOTAL SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED = 185.2 SF X 0.74 GPD/SF X7.0 GPD TOTAL BOTTOM AREA PROVIDED = 428.8 SF X 0.74 GPD/SF = 3173 GPD MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADING UNDER TITLE 5 = 43-47 GPD ACTUAL HYDRAULIC LOADING = 440 GPD (SEE 1.) DESIGNED LEACHING AREA EXCEEDS LEACHING AREA REQUIRED UNDER BOTH TITLE 5 AND THE TOWN OF BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH REGULATIONS S.A.S CONSISTS OF THREE (3) 102"L X 58" W X 24" EFFECTIVE DEPTH LEACHING DRYWELLS, PLACED END TO END IN A 33.5' L X 12.8' W TRENCH WITH 3/4" - 1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE SURROUNDING SET TO ELEVATIONS SHOWN. ENGINEERING - SURVEYING - PERMITTING P.O. BOX 101, 161,CRANBERRY HIGHWAY ORLEANS, MA TYPICAL LEACHING TRENCH CROSS SECTION - NO SCALE PROVIDE 18" MIN. DIA. WATERTIGHT ACCESS MANHOLE AND COVER PROVIDE 4" HEADER CONSTRUCTED OF DURABLE MATERIAL AND PVC VENT BROUGHT TO WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM GRADE TYP. ONE CHAMBER FG =SEE PLAN 2% MIN. GRADE OVER SYSTEM FOR: AN EXISTING 4 BEDROOM DWELLING � CLEAN �ACKFILL RFAK AT: 48 FAR FIELDS ROAD INV. = 96.00 n OUT BREWSTER, MA EL = -96.5 ASSESSOR'S MAP: 65 PARCEL: 45 'co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPLICANT: BRUCE SAUTER TEL. NO.: (774)722-0105 >0 000000 0 000000000 �oo0 48 FAR FIELDS ROAD $g 0 0 0 0 0 ED 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 E7 E3 0 O 0 0 0 E3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��8 oti O °! o i BREWSTER, MA 02631 JOB #:0-12639 �v L DATE: JUNE 5, 2023 DESIGNED Y: 4' 8.5' 4 8lorroM t� �'`<Nofy��' LAS DRAWN BY: OF SYST. T 0�F1' � LAS 33.5' 9442 A� CHECKED BY: Pu <a s LAS S.A.S CONSISTS OF THREE (3) 102"L X 58" W X 24" EFFECTIVE DEPTH LEACHING DRYWELLS, PLACED END TO END IN A 33.5' L X 12.8' W TRENCH WITH 3/4" - 1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE SURROUNDING SET TO ELEVATIONS SHOWN. ENGINEERING - SURVEYING - PERMITTING P.O. BOX 101, 161,CRANBERRY HIGHWAY ORLEANS, MA 1A E W 0 0 -4" P't� 0RP0Vk0rj'b 19 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 brhealth!.�,. -ewster-maxov WWW.BREWSTER-MA.GOV I/A System Samples for Discussion July 5, 2023 BOH Meeting Sample I/A Systems (Systems out of compliance): 1. System A - 2007 installation of Singulair 960 DN - Property in Zone 11 and DCPC - Provisional Approval - Maximum 19 ppm of Total Nitrogen allowed - Sample frequency — 2x/year - Total Nitrogen above limit 2. System B - 2001 installation of Singulair 960 DN - Property in Zone 11 and DCPC - General Approval with Nitrogen removal - Maximum 19 ppm of Total Nitrogen allowed - Sample frequency — 2x/year - Total Nitrogen above limit 3. System C - 2002 installation of Singulair 960 DN - Property in Zone 11 and DCPC - Pilot Approval with Nitrogen removal - Maximum 19 ppm of Total Nitrogen allowed - Sample frequency — 2x/year - Total Nitrogen above limit N:\Heal"OH Meeting Notes\BOH Hearing Notes\BOH Hearing Notes 07.05.23 IA Samples.docx - I - Health Department Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Ewa,*TOWN OF $REWSTER orrlcr..or HEALTH�.DEPARTMENT 2198 MAIN STREET BREWST.ER, MA 02631 ° a PRONE.: (508) 896-3701 Exr 1120 �ii FP•""` FAX: (508) 896 4538 �p/pll4'NIAUP� BRI7}ALT1l 21BRFW'STBR-MA. GOV ` LOCAL REGULATION TO SUPPLEMENT TITLE 5 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE MONITORING OF INNOVATIVE/ALTERNATIVE ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 1. Authority — In considering the permitting and use of various alternative septic treatment technologies in the Town of Brewster, the Brewster Board of Health recognizes that there may be specific local circumstances which warrant the Board to require more stringent conditions for the installation and monitoring of these alternative systems than may be required by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. As allowed under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 31 and as permitted by 310 CMR 15.003 (3), 15.285 (2), 15.286 (5) and 15.288 (4), the Brewster Board of Health hereby adopts the following regulations concerning all innovative/alternative sewage treatment technologies and all systems where the soil absorption system is designed for pressure distribution of effluent. 2. Purpose —The purpose of this regulation is to provide a greater degree of protection to environmental and public health, to protect groundwater from contamination, prevent the spread of disease and provide specific reporting and monitoring requirement for the use of innovative/alternative sewage treatment technologies and pressure -distribution systems. 3. Monitoring Requirement — The Brewster Board of Health hereby requires that all owners and operators of innovative/alternative sewage treatment technologies and pressure -distribution systems approved for use in Brewster submit for approval to the Board of Health a proposed monitoring and reporting plan to evaluate the performance of the system. This plan shall include a description of any long-term operation or maintenance requirements of the alternative system and any education, financial assurance or other mechanism proposed to ensure effective long-term operation and maintenance. 4. Reporting of Monitoring and Maintenance Results —The Brewster Board of Health hereby requires that owners and operators of all innovative/alternative sewage treatment and pressure -distribution systems shall report the results of all operation, maintenance and monitoring activities required by the foregoing . provision or by the Department of Environmental Protection to the Brewster Board through the Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment. Such reporting must be performed in the manner specified by the Board of Health in imposing the monitoring requirement or in the form approved by the Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment and must occur within 15 days after each maintenance or monitoring event. 5. Reporting of Malfunctioning Systems — The Board of Health hereby further requires that when a system operator performs a system inspection and finds that a sewage treatment technology has malfunctioning components which have comprised the system's ability to treat sewage as designed, the operator shall report on the system's status and any planned corrective action, including a proposed deadline WWW.TOWN.BREWSTER.MA.US for said corrective action, to the Brewster Board of Health and the Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment within 48 hours of inspection. 6. Malfunctioning Systems — If at any time a monitoring or maintenance report indicates that an innovative/alternative system or system using pressure distribution is in need of corrective action, the Brewster Board of Health may hold a hearing to inquire as to whether corrective action is needed. If at such hearing, the Brewster Board of Health determines that such system is in need of corrective action, it may take enforcement action, including but not limited to the imposition of fines, orders to take corrective action or cease operation of the system, or any other action otherwise necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment. 7. Right to impose Additional Conditions Reserved —The Brewster Board of Health hereby reserves the right to impose any additional conditions, effluent water quality standards and/or monitoring and reporting requirements it views as necessary to ensure the safe performance of any innovative/alternative sewage treatment systems and all pressure -distribution systems permitted within the Town of Brewster. Such conditions may include, without limitation, specification of site or effluent characteristics; flow limitations; monitoring, testing and reporting requirements; a requirement that a certified operator operate the system; or financial assurance mechanisms. 8. Certified Operator Requirement — If a condition of approval for an innovative/alternative system or pressure -distribution system is that it be operated by a certified systems operator, the owner or operator shall provide the Brewster Board of Health with documentation verifying that said system will be operated by an operator certified by the Board of Certification of Operators of Wastewater Treatment Facilities pursuant to the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 21, Section 34A. A list of such certified operators doing business within the Town of Brewster shall be on file with the Brewster Board of Health for inspection or examination by any person. 9. Enforcement — In addition to the remedies described in the preceding sections, the Board of Health may enforce this regulation or enjoin violations thereof through any lawful process, and the election of one remedy shall not preclude enforcement through any other lawful means, including but not limited to the following: Whoever violates any provision of this regulation may be penalized by indictment or on complaint brought in the district court. Except as may be otherwise provided by law and as the district court may see fit to impose, the maximum penalty for each violation shall be a fine of not more than $1,000. Whoever violates any provision of this regulation may be penalized by a non -criminal disposition process as provided in Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 21D and the Town's non -criminal disposition bylaw. If non -criminal disposition is elected, then any person who violates any provision of this regulation shall be subject to the following penalties: • A fine of $30.00 for a first offense not corrected within 60 days of notice of the violation; • A fine of $60.00 for a second offense or failure to correct a prior offense within 120 days of notice of the violation; • A fine of $90.00 for a third offense or failure to correct a prior offense within 180 days of notice of the violation; A fine of $120.00 for a fourth or subsequent offense or failure to correct a prior offense within 240 days of the notice of violation; and An additional fine of $120.00 for failure to correct after each additional offense or 60 day period thereafter until compliance is met. Each day any violation exists shall be deemed to be a separate offense. Dr. Carmen Scherzo, Chairman Joe Ford Dr. Mary Chaffee Annette Graczewski Anne Bittner Board Of Health Adopted: December 20, 2005 Effective: Upon publication Amended: November 15, 2017 Effective: December 1, 2017 IIA Systems Enforcement Flow Chart Did TN values Stop exceed 30 mg/ L Was >30 consistent Research BOH Regulation ow Is property outside Zone II/DCPC or 100' of wetland - — BOH issue Is in future letter of NSA violation for BOH hearing Stop BOH hearing corrective - actions N/Health/BOHmeetingnotes/1Asystemsenforcementflowchartdraft Continue` �M= hearing 60 01 days to resolve) document Enforcement Stop VA System Town Summary Town of Brewster, Massachusetts Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment P.O. Box 427, Barnstable, MA 02630 General Permit Information Counts by DEP Approval Type �' Count General 46 Remedial 8 Provisional 8 Pilot 6 Unknown 22 Counts by Property Type Type Single Family Multi -Family Commercial Unknown Counts by Occupancy (Type Year -Round Seasonal Unknown Count 63 5 14 0 Count - - 59 3 24 Component Information Counts by Component Type ,Technology Advantex Bioclere Concrete Septic Tank Disinfection Unit FAST Hoot Aerobic Systems Pump Chamber Septitech Treatment System Singulair Bio -Kinetic WWT System Waterloo Biofilter Waterloo EC -P White Knight Innoculator/Generator TOTAL Counts by Inspection Frequency Frequency None Required Quarterly Bi -Annually Yearly Other Count _ 3 1 23 1 2 5 1 1 2 47 Count 0 17 12 18 0 Sampling Information Number of Permits with Sample Parameter Type Parameter Count Alkalinity 2 BOD5 12 CBOD 3 DO 3 Nitrate 21 Nitrite 20 No Parameters 62 Settleable Solids 1 TKN 20 TSS 12 Temperature F 1 Total Dissolved Phosphorus 3 Total Iron 3 Total N 20 Total P 3 Water Use 1 pH 13 TOTAL 200 Number of Permits with Sampling Frequency Frequency Count None Required 0 Quarterly 48 Bi -Annually 51 Yearly 39 Other 0 Brewster I/A Systems per County Database 2018-2023 Permit Number Site Address Sample Date Operator Component Effluent Total Nitrogej Effluent Dissolved Oxygen Effluent pH Effluent Total Phos orul uent Total Dissolved Pnos porus BREW-McG056-Sin 56 McGuerty Road 2019-10-14 Bennett Singulair 960 0 BREW-McG056-Sin 56 McGuerty Road 2020-10-26 Bennett Singulair 422.85 7.69 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2018-07-16 Bennett Singulair 151.43 7 BREW-McG056-Sin 56 McGuerty Road 2022-10-17 Bennett Singulair 97.64 6.68 BREW-Rob298-Adv 298 Robbins Hill Road 2021-11-01 Bennett Advantex 84.3 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2021-07-14 Bennett Bioclere 79.279 5.5 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2021-03-15 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 78.4 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2023-03-22 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 75.9 6.5 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2022-10-17 Bennett Singulair 72.47 7.54 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2020-01-30 Bennett Singulair 70 7 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2023-01-17 Bennett Singulair 69.573 7.62 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2021-04-01 Bennett Singulair 68.1 7.1 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2022-04-13 Bennett 61.8 6.7 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2021-07-07 Bennett --Singulair Singulair 58.1 0 BREW-0ld160-Sin 160 Old Red Top Road 2019-01-22 All Cape Env Singulair 52 7.01 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2021-11-01 Bennett Singulair 51.6 7.29 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2022-03-09 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 51.54 BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2018-10-10 Siegmund Singulair 48 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2022-01-20 Bennett Singulair 44.3 7.38 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2022-05-23 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 40.95 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2022-11-22 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 38.21 BREW-Tho007-Adv 7 Thousand Oaks Drive 2021-09-17 J.M. O'Reilly Advantex 36.249 6.5 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2023-01-17 Bennett Bioclere 34 6.11 BREW-McG056-Sin 56 McGuerty Road 2021-11-01 Bennett Singulair 33.8 6.83 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2020-05-01 Bennett Singulair 33.14 7 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2021-06-10 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 32.888 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2019-05-29 Septic Preservation Singulair 32.83 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2018-09-07 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 32 BREW-Tho007-Adv 7 Thousand Oaks Drive 2021-11-30 J.M. O'Reilly Advantex 31.98 6 BREW-Low015-FAS 15 Lower Road 2021-07-20 Coastal FAST 31.41 7.7 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2018-01-24 Bennett Singulair 31.28 6.5 BREW-Bri200-FAS 200 Brier Lane 2021-09-10 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 31 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2021-09-10 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 30.828 BREW-Low015-FAS 15 Lower Road 2019-06-12 Coastal FAST 30.8 7.21 BREW-Fos300-FAS 300 Foster Road 2018-06-18 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 29 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2019-09-09 Septic Preservation Singulair 28.87 BREW-Tho007-Adv 7 Thousand Oaks Drive 2022-02-23 J.M. O'Reilly Advantex 28.8 6 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2022-11-17 Siegmund Singulair 28.64 BREW-Low015-FAS 15 Lower Road 2018-09-10 Coastal FAST 28.2 7.25 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2019-04-02 Bennett Singulair 27.6 0 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2021-11-30 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 27.51 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2018-12-12 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 27 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2021-01-12 Bennett Singulair 27 7.14 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2020-10-26 Bennett Singulair 26.9 7.98 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2019-07-09 Bennett Singulair 25.32 0 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2018-09-18 Bennett Singulair 24.81 0 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2021-08-10 Septic Preservation Singulair 24.77 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2020-06-04 Septic Preservation Singulair 24.1 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2023-05-17 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 22.39 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2018-10-09 Bennett Singulair 22.1 0 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2018-01-03 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 22 BREW-Bea127-Bio 127 Beach Plum Lane 2018-08-20 Coastal Bioclere 21.6 7.33 BREW-Bur019-Bio 19 Burning Bush Way 2018-09-24 Coastal Bioclere 21.3 6.81 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2020-05-01 Bennett Waterloo 21.09 7 BREW -Sou 157 -Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2019-03-29 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 21 BREW-McG039-FAS 39 McGuerty Road 2022-09-01 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 20.39 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2018-06-18 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 20 N:\Health\IA Information\BOH IA Enforcement Information\Brewster IA Systems Spreadsheet County Data 6.29.2023 Brewster I/A Systems per County Database 2018-2023 BREW-Bur019-Bio 19 Burning Bush Way 2022-03-09 Coastal lBioclere 19.75 7.4 BREW-Bur019-Bio BREW-Sat320-Sin 19 Burning Bush Way 320 Satucket Road 2022-03-09 2018-04-03 Coastal Bennett Bioclere ISingulair 19.75 19.3 7.4 0 BREW-Bea127-Bio 127 Beach Plum Lane 2022-03-08 Coastal Bioclere 19.2 7.66 BREW-Bea127-Bio 127 Beach Plum Lane 2022-03-08 Coastal Bioclere 19.2 7.66 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2021-09-20 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 18.83 7 BREW-Bur019-Bio 19 Burning Bush Way 2021-03-22 Coastal Bioclere 17.71 7.13 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2019-01-08 Bennett Singulair 16.85 0 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2022-02-23 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 16.58 7 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2019-07-09 Bennett Bioclere 16.54 7 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2022-04-13 Bennett Waterloo 16.42 6.7 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2019-06-12 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 16.2 7.38 7.22 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2018-03-30 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 16 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2019-09-27 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 16 6.19 7.44 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2020-06-24 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 16 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2021-03-15 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 15.983 7 BREW-Bur019-Bio 19 Burning Bush Way 2020-09-09 Coastal Bioclere 15.82 6.84 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2021-03-03 Septic Preservation Singulair 15.8 BREW-Bea127-Bio 127 Beach Plum Lane 2019-08-27 Coastal Bioclere 15.02 7.54 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2020-03-19 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 15 BREW-McG056-Sin 56 McGuerty Road 2018-10-19 Bennett Singulair 14.97 0 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2019-10-14 Bennett Waterloo 14.921 0 BREW-Bea127-Bio 127 Beach Plum Lane 2023-03-06 Coastal Bioclere 14.88 6.89 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2019-09-14 Bennett Singulair 14.428 0 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2020-12-30 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 14.374 6.5 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2018-10-10 Septic Preservation Singulair 13.86 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2020-01-30 Bennett Bioclere 13.5 0 BREW-Sat320-Sin 320 Satucket Road 2018-03-22 Bennett Singulair 13.38 0 BREW-Soul57-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2022-05-23 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech_ 13.22 7 BREW-Soul57-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2019-12-18 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 13 7.12 6.74 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2021-11-29 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 12.04 6.5 BREW-Soul57-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2022-11-22 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 11.83 6.5 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2019-03-02 Bennett Waterloo 11.14 0 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2021-04-01 Bennett Waterloo 10.02 0 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2022-10-17 Bennett Waterloo 9.988 6.9 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2019-01-08 Bennett Bioclere 9.85 0 BREW-Bur019-Bio 19 Burning Bush Way 2019-09-18 Coastal Bioclere 9.844 7.7 BREW-Sou157-Sep BREW-Rus017-Wat 157 South Orleans Road 17 Russells Path 2020-09-24 2021-11-01 J.M. O'Reilly Bennett Septitech Waterloo 9.743 9.43 7 7.23 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2022-09-01 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 9.33 7 BREW-Sou157-Sep 157 South Orleans Road 2021-06-10 J.M. O'Reilly Septitech 9.273 7 BREW-Old160-Sin 160 Old Red Top Road 2020-10-26 All Cape Env Singulair 9.23 6.98 BREW-Bur019-Bio 19 Burning Bush Way 2023-03-09 Coastal Bioclere 9.17 7.08 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2023-04-27 Bennett Waterloo 8.47 7.12 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2018-10-09 Bennett Waterloo 8.36 7 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2020-07-13 Bennett Bioclere 8.21 7.86 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2020-10-26 Bennett Waterloo 8.028 7.31 BREW-Bri200-FAS 200 Brier Lane 2019-12-18 J.M. O'Reilly FAST 7.8 9.45 7.08 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2022-01-10 Bennett Bioclere 7.3 7.75 BREW-Bea127-Bio 127 Beach Plum Lane 2021-08-26 Coastal Bioclere 6.76 7.6 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2021-01-12 Bennett Bioclere 6.714 7.71 BREW-Rus017-Wat 17 Russells Path 2018-03-04 Bennett Waterloo 6.25 0 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2022-04-26 Siegmund Singulair 6.09 BREW-Old160-Sin 160 Old Red Top Road 2020-07-28 All Cape Env Singulair 5.84 6.4 BREW-Old078-Sin 78 Old Red Top Road 2019-12-16 Septic Preservation Singulair 5.63 BREW-Rob298-Adv 298 Robbins Hill Road 2022-05-27 Bennett Advantex 5.612 BREW-Lon159-Bio 1597 Long Pond Road 2018-07-16 Bennett Bioclere 5.31 7 BREW-Old078-Sin 178 Old Red Top Road 2021-01-12 Septic Preservation Singulair 5.159 N:\Health\IA Information\BOH IA Enforcement Information\Brewster IA Systems Spreadsheet County Data 6.29.2023 Brewster I/A Systems per County Database 2018-2023 BREW-Old160-Sin 160 Old Red Top Road 2020-05-07 All Cape Env Singulair 4.33 6.32 BREW-Old078-Sin BREW-Bea127-Bio 78 Old Red Top Road 127 Beach Plum Lane 2019-12-26 2022-09-21 Septic Preservation Coastal Singulair Bioclere 3.81 2.21 7.94 BREW-Bri200-FAS BREW-Lon159-Bio BREW-McG056-Sin 200 Brier Lane 1597 LonQ Pond Road 56 McGuerty Road 2020-02-12 2022-07-25 2018-01-24 J.M. O'Reilly Bennett Bennett FAST Bioclere Singulair 0.37 0 0 10.73 10.96 5.63 0 BREW-Old078-Sin BREW-Sac000-Bio 78 Old Red Top Road 0 Sachemus Trail 2018-04-02 2018-03-07 Septic Preservation Coastal Singulair Bioclere 0 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2018-08-20 Coastal Bioclere 7.37 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2018-10-22 Coastal Bioclere 0 7 BREW-Sac000-Bio BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 0 Sachemus Trail 2019-01-03 2019-04-01 Coastal Coastal Bioclere Bioclere 5 7.15 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2019-04-01 Coastal Bioclere 3 6.84 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2019-10-08 Coastal Bioclere 5 7.64 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2020-03-09 Coastal Bioclere 3 6.7 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2020-06-15 Coastal Bioclere 7.5 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2020-09-15 Coastal Bioclere 2 7.11 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2020-11-05 Coastal Bioclere 2 7.23 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2021-03-17 Coastal Bioclere 4 7.19 BREW-Sac000-Bio BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 0 Sachemus Trail 2021-06-15 2021-09-10 Coastal Coastal Bioclere Bioclere 2 3 6.94 7.3 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2021-12-27 Coastal Bioclere BREW-Sac000-Bio BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 0 Sachemus Trail 2022-03-22 2022-03-22 Coastal Coastal Bioclere Bioclere 2 2 7.6 7.6 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2022-06-22 Coastal Bioclere BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2022-09-21 Coastal Bioclere 3 7.17 BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2022-12-16 Coastal Bioclere BREW-Sac000-Bio 0 Sachemus Trail 2023-03-07 Coastal Bioclere 4 6.91 BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2018-01-19 Siegmund Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 158 Jonathans Way 2018-04-02 2019-09-09 Siegmund Siegmund Singulair Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2019-10-15 Siegmund Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2019-12-10 Siegmund Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2020-08-28 Siegmund Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2021-01-12 Siegmund Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 2021-05-10 Siegmund Singulair BREW-Jon158-Sin BREW-Jon158-Sin 158 Jonathans Way 158 Jonathans Way 2022-01-05 2022-03-23 Siegmund Sie mund Singulair Singulair BREW-3on158-Sin BREW-Bri200-FAS BREW-Fos300-FAS 158 Jonathans Way 200 Brier Lane 300 Foster Road 2022-11-17 2022-09-01 2019-06-07 Siegmund J.M. O'Reilly J.M. O'Reilly Singulair FAST FAST BREW-Bre030-BIO 30-40 Brewster Woods Drive 2023-04-28 Coastal Bioclere 0 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-06-27 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-06-27 Demo Company Pump Chamber 0.6 6.65 3 0 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-06-27 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 6.04 4.76 0.63 0 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-07-24 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 5.96 4.17 1.6 0 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-07-24 Demo Company Pump Chamber 1.17 6.32 3.2 0 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-07-24 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-08-13 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 5.38 3.73 1.8 2.2 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-08-13 Demo Company Pump Chamber 1.19 6.38 3.7 3.2 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-08-13 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-08-29 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 6.32 3.89 0.96 0.055 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-08-29 Demo Company Pump Chamber 2.46 6.66 5 4.1 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-08-29 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-11-21 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 8.9 3.99 0.112 0.092 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-11-21 Demo Company Pump Chamber 4.44 7.52 3.2 2.4 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2019-11-21 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-02-20 Demo Com any Waterloo EC -P 7.071 4.47 0.49 0.05 N:\Health\IA Information\BOH IA Enforcement Information\Brewster IA Systems Spreadsheet County Data 6.29.2023 Brewster I/A Systems per County Database 2018-2023 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-02-20 Demo Company Pump Chamber 3.6 7.55 0.88 0.72 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-02-20 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-05-20 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 6.41 4.78 0.51 0.056 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-05-20 Demo Company Pump Chamber 0.29 7.08 1.1 1 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-05-20 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-08-20 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 3.45 4.54 0.58 0.058 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-08-20 Demo Company Pump Chamber 0.15 6.94 1.5 1.4 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-08-20 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-11-19 Demo Company Waterloo EC -P 6.34 4.08 1 0.12 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-11-19 Demo Company Pump Chamber 3.73 7.78 5.8 5.1 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2020-11-19 Demo Company Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-05-13 BCDHE Waterloo EC -P 5.16 4.66 0.9 0.23 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-05-13 BCDHE Pump Chamber -0.01 7.29 5.6 5.5 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-05-13 BCDHE Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-08-11 BCDHE Waterloo EC -P 3.85 3.48 1.9 0.78 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-08-11 BCDHE Pump Chamber -0.01 7.32 6.8 5.5 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-08-11 BCDHE Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-11-15 BCDHE Waterloo EC -P 7.88 3.55 3.1 1.5 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-11-15 BCDHE Pump Chamber 0.22 7.51 8.6 8 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2021-11-15 BCDHE Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-03-23 BCDHE Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-03-23 BCDHE Pump Chamber 0 7.23 6.61 6.02 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-03-23 BCDHE Waterloo EC -P 5.35 5.81 18.7 3.38 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-05-18 BCDHE Waterloo EC -P 4.9 5.31 4.31 3.35 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-05-18 BCDHE Pump Chamber 0.05 6.99 7.45 7.03 BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-05-18 BCDHE Concrete Tank BREW-Cra040-Wat 40 Cranview Road 2022-11-07 BCDHE Waterloo EC -P 8.71 3.59 28.1 28.1 BREW-Com044-FAS 44 Commons Way 2023-05-17 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2019-01-17 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2019-07-23 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2020-01-14 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2020-07-23 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2021-02-22 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2021-12-07 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2022-03-29 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2022-10-18 WTS FAST BREW-Sar050-FAS 50 Sarah Maker Lane 2023-02-17 WTS FAST BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2019-02-21 WTS Septitech 8 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2019-06-19 WTS Septitech 7.5 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2019-10-03 WTS Septitech 7.8 BREW-SeaO5O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2020-01-13 WTS Septitech 7.5 BREW-Sea050-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2020-04-09 WTS Septitech 6.9 BREW-SeaO5O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2020-08-13 WTS Septitech 6.9 BREW-Sea050-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2021-02-22 WTS Septitech 7.9 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2021-06-04 WTS Septitech 7.8 BREW-Sea050-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2021-12-07 WTS Septitech 7.8 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2022-02-08 WTS Septitech 7.9 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2022-06-14 WTS Septitech 6.1 BREW-Sea050-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2022-09-14 WTS Septitech 8 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2022-10-18 WTS Septitech 7.7 BREW-SeaO5O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2022-12-21 WTS Septitech 7.74 BREW-Sea050-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2023-02-17 WTS Septitech 8 BREW-Sea05O-Sep 50 Sea Meadow Lane 2023-05-17 WTS Se titech 7.9 BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2018-09-07 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2018-11-30 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2019-02-27 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2019-06-19 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2020-07-23 WTS FAST N:\Health\IA Information\BOH IA Enforcement Information\Brewster IA Systems Spreadsheet County Data 6.29.2023 Brewster I/A Systems per County Database 2018-2023 BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2021-01-15 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2021-08-12 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2022-03-29 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2022-07-08 WTS FAST BREW-Thou054-FAS 54 Thousand Oaks Drive 2023-03-14 WTS FAST BREW-Gre083-FAS 83 Greenland Pond Road 2021-12-09 WTS FAST BREW-Gre083-FAS 83 Greenland Pond Road 2022-03-29 WTS FAST BREW-Gre083-FAS 83 Greenland Pond Road 2022-06-14 WTS FAST BREW-Gre083-FAS 83 Greenland Pond Road 2022-10-18 WTS FAST N:\Health\IA Information\BOH IA Enforcement Information\Brewster IA Systems Spreadsheet County Data 6.29.2023 IIA System Sample Report History 1, Brewster Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment P.O. Box 427, Barnstable, MA 02630 Effluent Sample Results Date TN N itrate N itrite 10/17/2009 0.3 0.3 03/02/2010 18.8 3.1 6.7 07/18/2010 11.84 3.1 0.44 04/15/2011 9.95 3.8 0.85 11/18/2011 10.6 1.9 0.9 10/15/2012 13.2 4.4 1.7 04/11/2016 21.68 5.7 0.88 07/05/2016 9.09 3.7 0.1 10/11/2016 54.44 30 0.34 12/06/2016 17.3 12 0.7 01/11/2017 45.6 7.7 14 03129/2017 40.48 0.28 4.6 04/20/2017 6.55 2.7 07/13/2017 25.66 24 0.15 10/11/2017 27.97 17 0.37 01/24/2018 31.28 0.58 2.8 03/22/2018 13.38 0.38 2.2 04/03/2018 19.3 4.5 3.1 07/16/2018 151.43 0.43 09/18/2018 24.81 17 0.19 10/09/2018 22.1 17 0.31 01/08/2019 16.85 12 0.25 04/02/2019 27.6 0.52 0.58 07/09/2019 25.32 4.3 0.42 09/14/2019 14.428 7.1 0.088 01/30/2020 70 05/01/2020 33.14 0.46 0.78 10/26/2020 26.9 0.46 0.34 01/12/2021 27 3.4 04/01/2021 68.1 07/07/2021 58.1 2 11/01/2021 51.6 01/20/2022 44.3 04113/2022 61.8 TKN 9 8.3 5.3 7.8 7.1 15.1 5.29 24.1 4.6 23.9 35.6 3.85 1.51 10.6 27.9 10.8 11.7 151 7.62 4.79 4.6 26.5 20.6 7.24 70 31.9 26.1 23.6 68.1 56.1 51.6 44.3 61.8 BOD5 2 22 18 17 22 15 78 28 45 130 24 10 41 120 120 180 300 11 14 9.6 190 66 9.1 530 110 78 130 100 38 47 86 70 TSS 35 35 11 12 17 12 13 15 250 34 97 63 120 3300 8.1 6.9 15 26 150 71 3900 43 830 75 72 46 120 140 150 pH 8.1 7.9 7.9 7.9 6.5 6.5 7 7 7 7.98 7.14 7.1 7.29 7.38 6.7 Date TN Nitrate Nitrite TKN BODS TSS pH 10/17/2022 72.47 0.33 0.24 71.9 140 140 7.54 01/17/2023 69.573 0.1 0.073 69.4 150 230 7.62 Median 26.28 3.75 0.7 20.6 56.5 63 7.29 Influent Sample Results No Influent Sample Results 06/15/2023 04:25pm Page 2 of 2 �" i' ,Minimum Building Setbacks qF i Front - 40 ,4, Side & Rear - 25' .X 4 done II - Croundw�ater Protection .District �� ` LOT 2 0W $ \ \ 42,495 S. F f 0.98 Ac. - _ _ _\ F \ � 7� -PROPOSED e Sl GULAIR 1 - 960-600 NR 4 �\ fi # o lea 1 fI TH r I' \/ > U1 EXISTING PROPOSED / RECIRCULATION � Box / CHAMBER }. M / I TH#4 TH#3 jj�'- J � / 'EXISTING t3 LEACHING FACILITY Top of Foundation r � \ Elev. 88.0r EXISTING FOUNDATION Top of Foundotion EL=88.15 r 49.79' - -- -- B6°16'03" 103.54' \ -7 1 OLL� �e Iva �e 80.2 79.9 79.4 78.5 ro.� MEDIUM .SAND C LOAMY SAND 9.4 73.42 0 �� � 775 77.E top soil) !O. LOAMY SAND79. LOAMY SAND A A 76.5 LOAMY SANDY LOAM C1 SANDY LOAM a aaP a o a B SAND 77.6 Z B LOAMY , a PPP � SAND 176.2 I 74.8 G1 SANDY W C1 SANDY LOAM Q LOAM 72.8 74.4 C2 MEDIUM SAND - 71.4 MEDIUM 03 10 FINE SAND 68.4 0,21 MEDIUM SAND 67.7 MEDIUM 03 TO FINE SAND 658 11M, BL'NCH�1`4RI� 'oma '` TOP OF C. B. FND ELEV = 84.79' \ (ASSUMED DATUM) 000, lee - LEC T V D 0 E A B �e �7� ? 0 76.9 \ A 6. Z 776.6 � B �e 80.2 79.9 79.4 78.5 ro.� MEDIUM .SAND ro.� LOAMY SAND LOAMY SAND�. LOAMY SAND LOAMY .SAND top soil) 0 Absorption chamber L ---------------------- system (exist. J V Concrete bound W 1 SANDY LOAM C1 SANDY LOAM a aaP a o a Effective P Pa 2� , a PPP 73.7 as ° R e° PP PP 176.2 �.IMEDIUM SAND �2 MEDIUM SAND 70.9 C3 FINE SAND 66.7 1 J 69.2 K o water encountered) .Date of test.' 411=9107 D. zP,.4.z.) mcCULL 0r,70H (B. 0. H% GEYE) 4L NOTES: 1. System is designed in accordance with "Commonwealth gf Mass., Dept. of Environmental Protection, 310 CMR 15.00, the State Environmental Code, Title 5: Standard Requirements far the Siting Construction, Inspection, Upgrade and E.apanston of On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems" and the Town of BRE)FSTER Regulations. .2. No wells or water supplies are known to exist within f 00 feet of the proposed leaching system All wells known to exist within f50 ft of the s,ystem are shown. 3. Prior to backfilling completed system, notify the Engineer and the Board of Health for inspection Provide 24 hr. ('min) notice. 4. Contractor shall be responsible for verifying location of all underground utilities prior to excavation. 5. Any changes to this plan must be approved by the Board of Health. 6. Area served by town water. 7 7'hrougfiout its life, the Singulair shall be under a maintenance agreement in accordance with the conditions of DEP's 11i-ovisional Use ,4pproval. LOC47710N ff14P Not to ,scale m CANOE POND G �0 5�� LOCUS UPPER MILLPOND G� �2 WALKERS PQO POND RL'FTRTNCL°- Assr's. Afap 37 Parcel 2,9 Z TYPICI4L S`YST�'�I PROFIL_' Not to scale Tank & B Box to be installed on level, stable base. (Afin. 6" stone base) Maintain a maximum of 36"cover over all system components. All components shall conform to specifications contained -FD SINGl1LAlR & RECIRC PUMP an 3f0 CAfR 15.00. PROPC� - �>'mirr., z'mnr.� � E:zisting 14 ` DISCHARGE TUBING I l 13' -1 p Existing InV.El. fO. fin FROM RECIR. PUMP I p� I FROM COWROL Bax q 13'1- mai. run 75.5'i ,� } CONCREII: COMM a FINISHED GRADE �tr5+;v_,..-.. •�., Note.• ii4 Outle, r DW sn, all Puy q for Z' Cevel �.� Inv.El. /� Inv. El 77.0 4" cast in'n or sched. W49 pipe -DESIOX A4 T,4 5 00 N® mom L�4 1I 1W 11- SIAGULAIR MODE -950-600 ivl 78.60 DISCHARGE TUBING L RE-ORcuunoa� PUMP I1VI EL 76.67 NO GARBAGE GRINDER ALLOWED WITH THIS DESIGN. -------1----- f3ux r ------- scheaC 40 P.. V C. Exist. P ®®®®®® Inv. .Ed °° Match 76.D'f Exist.--- xis'------------ 76. f7 f ABSORPTION CSI,4ff.BER 2VG (500 -CAL. "ACW PREC,4ST" UNITS, OR E49UAL) Not to scale Number of bedroorn.s.• 5 Estimated daily effluent.- 550 G/Oak/ Total leaching area as proposed• SidewalL. 2(Lf If'J x 0 Bottom: L .x #, = 531.2 S.F. Leaching Capacity as proposed - (Effluent loading rate = 0.74 6!FD/5'F) Sidewall - -217.,2 X 0.74 = 160.7 Bottom.- 531.2 X 0. 74 = 393. f T0T14L = 553.8 C/Day Test Dole location - -82- - Existing contour -88--- Proposed contour 0o Singulair Model 96e-600 NR P° 0istri bution box (ezislj 41.5' x 12.8' x 2' top soil) 0 Absorption chamber L ---------------------- system (exist. J - C'B. Concrete bound W Xater service K o water encountered) .Date of test.' 411=9107 D. zP,.4.z.) mcCULL 0r,70H (B. 0. H% GEYE) 4L NOTES: 1. System is designed in accordance with "Commonwealth gf Mass., Dept. of Environmental Protection, 310 CMR 15.00, the State Environmental Code, Title 5: Standard Requirements far the Siting Construction, Inspection, Upgrade and E.apanston of On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems" and the Town of BRE)FSTER Regulations. .2. No wells or water supplies are known to exist within f 00 feet of the proposed leaching system All wells known to exist within f50 ft of the s,ystem are shown. 3. Prior to backfilling completed system, notify the Engineer and the Board of Health for inspection Provide 24 hr. ('min) notice. 4. Contractor shall be responsible for verifying location of all underground utilities prior to excavation. 5. Any changes to this plan must be approved by the Board of Health. 6. Area served by town water. 7 7'hrougfiout its life, the Singulair shall be under a maintenance agreement in accordance with the conditions of DEP's 11i-ovisional Use ,4pproval. LOC47710N ff14P Not to ,scale m CANOE POND G �0 5�� LOCUS UPPER MILLPOND G� �2 WALKERS PQO POND RL'FTRTNCL°- Assr's. Afap 37 Parcel 2,9 Z TYPICI4L S`YST�'�I PROFIL_' Not to scale Tank & B Box to be installed on level, stable base. (Afin. 6" stone base) Maintain a maximum of 36"cover over all system components. All components shall conform to specifications contained -FD SINGl1LAlR & RECIRC PUMP an 3f0 CAfR 15.00. PROPC� - �>'mirr., z'mnr.� � E:zisting 14 ` DISCHARGE TUBING I l 13' -1 p Existing InV.El. fO. fin FROM RECIR. PUMP I p� I FROM COWROL Bax q 13'1- mai. run 75.5'i ,� } CONCREII: COMM a FINISHED GRADE �tr5+;v_,..-.. •�., Note.• ii4 Outle, r DW sn, all Puy q for Z' Cevel �.� Inv.El. /� Inv. El 77.0 4" cast in'n or sched. W49 pipe -DESIOX A4 T,4 5 00 N® mom L�4 1I 1W 11- SIAGULAIR MODE -950-600 ivl 78.60 DISCHARGE TUBING L RE-ORcuunoa� PUMP I1VI EL 76.67 NO GARBAGE GRINDER ALLOWED WITH THIS DESIGN. -------1----- f3ux r ------- scheaC 40 P.. V C. Exist. P ®®®®®® Inv. .Ed °° Match 76.D'f Exist.--- xis'------------ 76. f7 f ABSORPTION CSI,4ff.BER 2VG (500 -CAL. "ACW PREC,4ST" UNITS, OR E49UAL) Not to scale Number of bedroorn.s.• 5 Estimated daily effluent.- 550 G/Oak/ Total leaching area as proposed• SidewalL. 2(Lf If'J x 0 Bottom: L .x #, = 531.2 S.F. Leaching Capacity as proposed - (Effluent loading rate = 0.74 6!FD/5'F) Sidewall - -217.,2 X 0.74 = 160.7 Bottom.- 531.2 X 0. 74 = 393. f T0T14L = 553.8 C/Day �4' sIDEs� 33.5' Max. Final Crain Elm = 79.3' 1 ----------------- 9" 'Vin ®®®� 0 cover f P° top soil) L ---------------------- P n w P n I �4' sIDEs� 33.5' Max. Final Crain Elm = 79.3' 1 (3 UNITS #1' 4' OF STONE IN BETIYEENJ EFFECTIVE LENCTH = 41.5' EFFECTIVE R'IDThf = 1.2.8' 4' - �4' sIDEs� PROPOSED OW -SITE STX4 CL' Tj?T4TfjW77 AjV9 -01 POS14L S_'S'T..�'.f TLW*f Prepared fora A. RYDIER location: "� =; cevxn Ryder & TYilcox,`J Inc. , P. E & -PLS 3 Ciddiali Hill Rd. r ''Revised Date - 10115107 - Singu air P.O. Box 439 Scale: 1 " = 30' 5 bedrooms S'o. Orleans, h1,4., 026'62 Drawn by A71jzb Tel. (508) 255-831.2 Date April 20, 2007 Fax. (508) 240-2306 Reviscd Date - June 21, 2007 Proposed 4 bedroom dwelling Sheet 1 of 2 Job Na. 7 0 7 00 9" 'Vin cover f rExclud top soil) I ° D. P a aaP a o a Effective P Pa 2� , a PPP --------------5 as ° R e° PP PP Bottom I L°l = 73.5' I (3 UNITS #1' 4' OF STONE IN BETIYEENJ EFFECTIVE LENCTH = 41.5' EFFECTIVE R'IDThf = 1.2.8' 4' - �4' sIDEs� PROPOSED OW -SITE STX4 CL' Tj?T4TfjW77 AjV9 -01 POS14L S_'S'T..�'.f TLW*f Prepared fora A. RYDIER location: "� =; cevxn Ryder & TYilcox,`J Inc. , P. E & -PLS 3 Ciddiali Hill Rd. r ''Revised Date - 10115107 - Singu air P.O. Box 439 Scale: 1 " = 30' 5 bedrooms S'o. Orleans, h1,4., 026'62 Drawn by A71jzb Tel. (508) 255-831.2 Date April 20, 2007 Fax. (508) 240-2306 Reviscd Date - June 21, 2007 Proposed 4 bedroom dwelling Sheet 1 of 2 Job Na. 7 0 7 00 VA System Sample, Report History 1, Brewster Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment P.O. Box 427, Barnstable, MA 02630 Effluent Sample Results Date TN Nitrate Nitrite TKN 10/21/2008 1.1 11/24/2008 11.3 06/18/2009 17.8 08/18/2010 6.7 06/25/2011 4.7 09/18/2011 3.5 07/02/2013 5 10/03/2013 20 12/12/2013 0.05 01/14/2014 1.6 07/02/2014 18.6 3.8 3.7 11.1 10/06/2014 0.05 0.066 199 11/06/2014 21 1.1 770 07/07/2015 17.4 3.8 1.7 11.9 10/07/2015 43.7 28 0.5 15.2 04/13/2016 0.72 42.2 07/05/2016 1 0.45 49.2 10/11/2016 0.15 0.084 808 12/06/2016 113.56 0.56 113 12/18/2016 22.92 21 0.15 1.77 07/27/2017 11.5 11.5 11.7 01119/2018 2.1 9.4 39.3 04/02/2018 0.13 10/10/2018 48 21 2.6 24.4 09/09/2019 3.7 10/15/2019 8 12/10/2019 1.2 08/28/2020 14 01/12/2021 6 05/10/2021 16 01/05/2022 9.9 03/23/2022 17 11/17/2022 27 1.4 39.2 Median 33.31 6 0.91 39.25 BODS 3.2 3.2 0 Inspection and Testing Requirements Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment P.O. Box 427 Barnstable, AM 02630 Phone: (508) 375-6888 Fax: (508) 375-6880 BREWSTER MA 2631 Massachusetts DEP Approval Level: General with Nitrogen Requirements Inspection Requirements Your system is required to be inspected Quarterly Additional system components that must be inspected: ❑ Ultraviolet Disinfection Unit - Because of the presence of this unit in your system, you may be required to have your system effluent tested for Fecal Coliform bacteria. See "Testing Requirements" below. ❑ Pump Chambers - Testing Requirements Your system is required to be tested as follows: ❑ Annual Field Test Only Includes testing for pH, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) -and turbidity. Additionally, the effluent must be visually inspected for color, turbidity and effluent solids. Failure of any of these tests will require that a laboratory test be completed for pH, BOD5, and TSS. Failure of any laboratory test requires a follow-up inspection and field test within 60 days. ✓❑ Effluent Lab Testing - Semi -Annually The effluent is to be tested for: ❑ TKN ❑ Alkalinity ❑ pH Nitrate ❑ Ammonia ❑ Temperature ❑ Nitrite ❑ BOD5/CBOD ❑ Water Usage ❑ Total Nitrogen ❑ TSS ❑ Conductance ❑ Fecal Coliform ❑ Influent Lab Testing - The influent is to be tested for: ❑ TKN ❑ Alkalinity ❑ pH ❑ Nitrate ❑ Ammonia ❑ Temperature ❑ Nitrite ❑ BOD5/CBOD ❑ TSS ❑ Total Nitrogen ❑ Fecal Coliform ❑ Water Usage Please make sure that any contract you sign contains provisions for each of the above requirements. Failure to follow these requirements can result in a Board of Health hearing. Questions can be directed to the Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment or your local Health Department. W Town of Brewster Q�k 9F;� •_ 2198 MAIN STREET Health Department Z = BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 Nancy Ellis Ice O . (508) 896-3701 FAX (508) 896-8089 May 4, 2004 Hollister S. Siegmund Siegmund Environmental Services, Inc. 49 Pavillion Avenue Providence, RI 02905 Re: Dear Mr. Siegmund: On April 20, 2004, the Board of Health reviewed the latest inspection and maintenance report for this property. The Board voted that this installation be monitored biannually for nitrate. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Nancy Ellis Ice, CHO, RS Health Director Test Hole Number Nppth From Surface (inches) Soil Soil Texture Horizon (USDA) 74 1 Sol] Colorsoil Other (MunSB10 Mottling (Structure, Stones, Consistency, %Gravel) A) Neither driveway nor parking areas are allowed _ -_ -- - _ 32 i-? Basis of Design �' over septic system unless H-20 components are used. 3z �` Yj I Number of Bedrooms: g) The designer will not be responsible for the system '�24x 5 4 3 $ Other: as designed unless constructed as shown. Any changes 2.)Design Daily Sewage Flow G.P.D. shall be approved in writing. A, �% TION HOLE LOG Date of Tess " -1 "' Use Soil Class... Willi ❑ Percolation Rate 411 rc. rate of less than . Min./in- for a loading rate of •'�. ,GPD /s,f. Witnessed by i res, 1_ k -A r'l T - FLOW PROFILE -Top of Foundation L -3 EIevatlon -_ 474) CONSTRUCTION NOTES L) All construction shall conform to the State Environmental Code, Title 5, and the requirements of the local Board of Health. 2 ) 7eptic tank (s), grease trap(s), dosing chombe►(s), and distribution box(n) shall be set on a level stable base which has been mechanically compacted, or on a 6 lath crushed stone base. 3.) Septic tonk(sl shall most ASTM standard C 1127-93 and shall have at least three 20"diameter manholes. The minimum depth from the bottom of septic tank to the flour line shall be 48 `. 4.) Schedule 40 PVC inlet and outlet toes shall extend a minimum of 6"above the flow line of the septic tank and shall be installed on the centerline of the tank directly under the cleanout manholes. 5.)Raise covers of the septic tank and distribution box with pre -cost concrete water tight risers over Inlet and outlet tees to within 6"of finish grade. 6.1 Piping shall consist of 4" schedule 40 PVC or equivalent. Pipe shall be laid on a minimum continuous grade of not less than 1 %e, 7.) Distribution lines for soil absorption system (as req'd) shall be 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC laid at 0.005 fl./ft- Line shall be capped at end or ds noted. 8.} Outlet pipes from D -box shall remain level forgt least 2 feet before pitching to soil absorption system. Water test D -box to assure even distribution. 9.) )-box shotl have a minimum sump of 6"measured below the outlet invert. Finish Grade: '.5 36��mox. 9" min. 36" m aI x. flow line -T DiSMDUfian Bax r lib r� y^ f �. r7: f,+ ,1 .,..� r y PEI sYi14, OA Existing Contour Proposed Contour existing Spot Grade Proposed Spot Grads Water Service Overhead Utility Llns(s) Underground Utility Lines) Gas Line Test Hole and/or Boring Location Septic Tank Distribution Box Soil Absorption System Reserved for System Utility Pole Catch Basin i Fire Hydrant Well 10.) Base aggregate for leaching facility shall consist of 3J4" to 1-1/2" double washed stone free of iron, fines and dust and shalt be installed from below the crown of the distribution line b the bottom of the soil absorption system. Base aggregate shall be covered with a 2"loyer of 1/8" to 1/2"double washed stone free of iron, fines and dust, II.) Vent soil absorption system when distribution lines exceed 50 feet, when located either In whole or in part under driveways, parking, turning areas, or other impervious material, or when dosed. 121 Solt absorption system shall be covered with a minirnurn of 9" of clean medium sand (excluding topsoil ) 13.) Finish grade shall be a maximum of 36" over the top of 00 system components, Including the septic tank, distribution box, dosing chamber and soil absorption system Septic tanks shall have a minimum cover of 9" 14.) From the date of installation of ttne soil aborption system until receipt of a Certificate of Compliance, the perimeter of the soil absorption system shall be staked and flogged to prevent the use of such area for all activities which might damage the system. 15.) The Bootd of Health shall require Inspection of all construction by on ogentof the Board of Health (or the designer if this system requires a variance) and may require such person to certify inwriting that all work has been completed in accordance with the terms Of the permit and approved pt-ans. 48 hours advance notice requested. !rte.} �.ir�!;'�-- ,``..',�.-t_.. _ ';r"';�: �-- �%I_+;•. 7-Pt�>'t �' �x A L - Z�> ie' V'10 Lpc_u5 C�0AXC'� LLL .�_. �? r '�ow Ail•i r P,M`TCP KEY MAP no scale Plan Book �1. Page ... Deed Book .- -- ... Page......- .. Assessors Map..4 _ Parcel � ff•. J � 1 HIS IS A REVISED FLAB IEV. DATE: 3-/� !,'ISCARD ALL PRIG: P .ANr /0 PROJECT ` TITSEWAGE DISPOSALYSTEM OF ILLY �' BENNETT_A O'REILLY, Inc. CrAL Engineering & Envin)nmentai Services iia IWO Go is www 1573 Mam Sueet Rowc 6A O P.O. Box 1667 508-846-6530 Office Brewster, MA 02631 548.896-1687 Fax y DATE: SCALE -.BY. CHECK: JOB NUMBER: SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS GENERAL NOTES LEGE h1 D Sol] Colorsoil Other (MunSB10 Mottling (Structure, Stones, Consistency, %Gravel) A) Neither driveway nor parking areas are allowed _ -_ -- - _ 32 i-? Basis of Design �' over septic system unless H-20 components are used. 3z �` Yj I Number of Bedrooms: g) The designer will not be responsible for the system '�24x 5 $ Other: as designed unless constructed as shown. Any changes 2.)Design Daily Sewage Flow G.P.D. shall be approved in writing. A, �% i' `' ' '"` 1� ---- -- W_ 3.}Septic Tank Capacity Required' ... Gal. C) Contractor shall be respons ible for verifying the--ohu-- 3.)Septic Provided. " Gal. location of all underground and overhead utilities -- u — prior to commencement of work. 4 -)Sail Absorption System Capacity -, � :_ r, Required, . - ... � - .. G.P.D. -JTH. � Provided: �:..:.. ` nr✓ 7`0.B. %t�1�#.f"1 r i o �rtF Z� 74 l 4 5.)A Garbage Disposal is- permitted w/this design, Date of Tess " -1 "' Use Soil Class... Willi ❑ Percolation Rate 411 rc. rate of less than . Min./in- for a loading rate of •'�. ,GPD /s,f. Witnessed by i res, 1_ k -A r'l T - FLOW PROFILE -Top of Foundation L -3 EIevatlon -_ 474) CONSTRUCTION NOTES L) All construction shall conform to the State Environmental Code, Title 5, and the requirements of the local Board of Health. 2 ) 7eptic tank (s), grease trap(s), dosing chombe►(s), and distribution box(n) shall be set on a level stable base which has been mechanically compacted, or on a 6 lath crushed stone base. 3.) Septic tonk(sl shall most ASTM standard C 1127-93 and shall have at least three 20"diameter manholes. The minimum depth from the bottom of septic tank to the flour line shall be 48 `. 4.) Schedule 40 PVC inlet and outlet toes shall extend a minimum of 6"above the flow line of the septic tank and shall be installed on the centerline of the tank directly under the cleanout manholes. 5.)Raise covers of the septic tank and distribution box with pre -cost concrete water tight risers over Inlet and outlet tees to within 6"of finish grade. 6.1 Piping shall consist of 4" schedule 40 PVC or equivalent. Pipe shall be laid on a minimum continuous grade of not less than 1 %e, 7.) Distribution lines for soil absorption system (as req'd) shall be 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC laid at 0.005 fl./ft- Line shall be capped at end or ds noted. 8.} Outlet pipes from D -box shall remain level forgt least 2 feet before pitching to soil absorption system. Water test D -box to assure even distribution. 9.) )-box shotl have a minimum sump of 6"measured below the outlet invert. Finish Grade: '.5 36��mox. 9" min. 36" m aI x. flow line -T DiSMDUfian Bax r lib r� y^ f �. r7: f,+ ,1 .,..� r y PEI sYi14, OA Existing Contour Proposed Contour existing Spot Grade Proposed Spot Grads Water Service Overhead Utility Llns(s) Underground Utility Lines) Gas Line Test Hole and/or Boring Location Septic Tank Distribution Box Soil Absorption System Reserved for System Utility Pole Catch Basin i Fire Hydrant Well 10.) Base aggregate for leaching facility shall consist of 3J4" to 1-1/2" double washed stone free of iron, fines and dust and shalt be installed from below the crown of the distribution line b the bottom of the soil absorption system. Base aggregate shall be covered with a 2"loyer of 1/8" to 1/2"double washed stone free of iron, fines and dust, II.) Vent soil absorption system when distribution lines exceed 50 feet, when located either In whole or in part under driveways, parking, turning areas, or other impervious material, or when dosed. 121 Solt absorption system shall be covered with a minirnurn of 9" of clean medium sand (excluding topsoil ) 13.) Finish grade shall be a maximum of 36" over the top of 00 system components, Including the septic tank, distribution box, dosing chamber and soil absorption system Septic tanks shall have a minimum cover of 9" 14.) From the date of installation of ttne soil aborption system until receipt of a Certificate of Compliance, the perimeter of the soil absorption system shall be staked and flogged to prevent the use of such area for all activities which might damage the system. 15.) The Bootd of Health shall require Inspection of all construction by on ogentof the Board of Health (or the designer if this system requires a variance) and may require such person to certify inwriting that all work has been completed in accordance with the terms Of the permit and approved pt-ans. 48 hours advance notice requested. !rte.} �.ir�!;'�-- ,``..',�.-t_.. _ ';r"';�: �-- �%I_+;•. 7-Pt�>'t �' �x A L - Z�> ie' V'10 Lpc_u5 C�0AXC'� LLL .�_. �? r '�ow Ail•i r P,M`TCP KEY MAP no scale Plan Book �1. Page ... Deed Book .- -- ... Page......- .. Assessors Map..4 _ Parcel � ff•. J � 1 HIS IS A REVISED FLAB IEV. DATE: 3-/� !,'ISCARD ALL PRIG: P .ANr /0 PROJECT ` TITSEWAGE DISPOSALYSTEM OF ILLY �' BENNETT_A O'REILLY, Inc. CrAL Engineering & Envin)nmentai Services iia IWO Go is www 1573 Mam Sueet Rowc 6A O P.O. Box 1667 508-846-6530 Office Brewster, MA 02631 548.896-1687 Fax y DATE: SCALE -.BY. CHECK: JOB NUMBER: I/A System Sample Report History -, Brewster Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment P.O. Box 427, Barnstable, MA 02630 Effluent Sample Results Date TN Nitrate Nitrite TKN BOD5 TSS pH 12/11/2009 15.2 1.2 0.6 13.4 26 14 7.1 09/03/2011 9.56 3.7 0.76 5.1 12 11 7.5 10/11/2017 78 78 100 100 7 01/24/2018 180 260 10/19/2018 14.97 8.6 0.2 6.17 17 58 10/14/2019 960 960 990 9300 10/26/2020 422.85 2.6 0.25 420 1100 8300 7.69 11/01/2021 33.8 2.4 8.4 23 51 62 6.83 10/17/2022 97.64 0.24 1.3 96.1 170 490 6.68 Median 55.9 2.5 0.68 50.5 100 100 7.05 Influent Sample Results No Influent Sample Results 06/15/2023 04:08pm Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Watershed Permitting Program7�_. �_ TITLE 5 PROGRAM M.G.L. c.21 §§ 26-53, 310 CMR 15.000 For Reduction in Sampling or Inspection of UA Systems 2005ATTENTION: Anthon & Lara Rhodes General Information �r f {`='' Tr,' Y OWNER NAME: DEP FACILITY ID W029848 OWNER ADDRESS: MA 02631 LOCATION OF UA SYSTEM: _ 3rewster, MA 02631 c Alternative On -Site Svstem Samplinz and Inspection The DEP, Watershed Permitting Progr ecords indicate that the system serving your facility is a: Singulair with a F1 Remedial Use Approval Piloting Approval ❑ Provisional Use Approval ❑ Certification for General Use requiring that throughout its life, the Singulair system shall be under a maintenance agreement and inspected, ❑ Monthly [Quarterly Semi 11 -seasonal and the ❑ influent and Q ffluent, and shall be monitored for, ❑ flow �H p�OD TSS Total Nitrogen ❑ Other as specified in either the facility approval letter for your system or as required by the Department's IA Technology Approval. All facilities shall submit monitoring results to the Department. Approval/Denial of Reduction in Sam lin and Ins ection. Fr the date of issuance of this notice, you may take the following actions: Reduce sampling from four times to once per year. ❑ Reduce sampling to twice per year, once two weeks after startup and once within two weeks of shutdown of system. ❑ Reduce sampling to once per year, within two weeks of shutdown ❑ No sample reduction; system is a General Use system, sampling is not required by the Department, contact your local BOH to determine their requirements. ❑ Reduced sampling denied , continue sampling per your approval, results of sampling indicate potential problems, the system is not meeting the permit limits for . parameter(s). Complete additional quarters of sampling before re -applying for reduction. ❑ Reduced sampling denied due to insufficient or non-current data, continue sampling per the Approval letter. ❑ Reduced sampling denied , this large altemative wastewater treatment system, with a design flow of approximately 330 gallons per requires inspection and effluent monitoring at least quankerly -continue sampling per the Approval letter. Continue inspections per the Approval letter. ❑ Reduce inspections to (or continue inspections) twice per year. once two weeks after startup and once within two weeks of shutdown. The System owner (or your designated facility Operator) must submit annually the required inspfiction and sampling data by; ❑ January 315` for the previous calendar year, or E] Se 30`s for the previous twelve months. or March 151 for the previous calendar. year. If the concentration of BOD and TSS (and/or TN) in the annual effluent sample from your system exceeds the 30 mg/L (or 19 mg/L) limits, then within 45 days of the annual sample you must both have your system sampled again and submit the results to the Department. Provided that the second sample meets the 30mg/L (and/or 19 mg/L) limits for BOD,. TSS (and/or TN), you may resume annual monitoring of your system. However, if the second sample does not meet the 30mg/L (and/or 19 mg/L) limit for BOD, TSS (and/or TN), you must resume sampling your system four times per year. Following four consecutive samples demonstrating the system meets the 30 mg/L (and/or 19 mg/L) limits for BOD and TSS (and/or TN), the Department would favorably consider another written request to reduce monitoring. TN limits only ao I • to those systems_ located in a Title 5 defined nitrogen sensitive area. All information shall be submitted to: DEP Boston Office, Title 5 Program, One Winter Street/6te Floor, Boston, MA 02108 Local Com )liance Issues These changes are conditioned upon your compliance with the Approval and the requirements of this notice. Please be aware the change(s) does not apply to local requirements. You should discuss any changes from local requirements, if any apply to your system, with your local Board of Health. You should check with the local Board prior to reducing inspection, sampling and reporting to ensure that any reduction is consistent with any local requirements. If you have any questions please contact: Dana Hill at (617 ) 292-5867 / -7 DATE ISSUED: {Signature} {Title} CC: Brewster Board of Health and Siegmund Environmental Services, 49 Pavilion Avenue, Providence, RI 02905 Siegmund ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES.iNc. 49 PAVILION AVENUE PROVIDENCE, RI 02905 P/401/785/0130 F/401/785/3110 W W W.siegmundgroup.com HUNGARY Marlett Kft, and Profes-Aqua, Kft. Budapest RUSSIA Sesi-Krasnodar Krasnodar SLOVAK REPUBLIC Ekostar/usa spot, sr,o. Tomasov WEST INDIES Rosewater Systems, N.V. St.Maarten McAlastair, Ltd. Nevis January 7, 2004 Ms. Nancy Ice Health Director Town of Brewster C/O Brewster Town Hall 2198 Main St Brewster, MA 02631 Dear Ms. Ice, d -j Happy New Year! Enclosed, please find the latest inspection reports and sampling results the following Singulair wastewater treatment systems installed and operating in Brewster: ADDRESS DEP ID W029848 0 `1. q 3 .er W053139 - 37 , s Here are the d test results to date: DATE BOD TSS pH TKN Nitrate Nitrite Total N 4/28/03 41 24 7.5 61 0 0.03 61.03 x'5/31/03 32 25 7.3 51 0 0.06 51.06 7/28/03 23 28 6.8 9.3 0.9 6 16.2 8/22/03 27 28 7.3 17 0 0.55 17.55 9/16/03 16 19 7.2 11 0 0.41 11.41 10/20/03 28 26 7 0.09 1.2 6.7 7.99 11/6/03 26.^ 10 7.1 0.02 1.3 16 1732 "After 5/31/03 we reduced aeration from 30 min/hour to 15 and saw significant improvement in effluent quality. Here are the 1 results to date where we started the system with reduced aeration of 15 rr un/hour: DATE BOD TSS pH TKN Nitrate Nitrite Total N 10/21/03 22 28 7.1 0.1 3.7 7.1 10.9 12/1/03 10 22 6.9 9.6 0 0.69 10.3 If you have anyquestions regarding the enclosed information, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Thank you, ter. enc. f Jan. S. 2003 11:10AM REEF REALTY LTD �No.3119 P. 2/69 to 3. _06-201:13 a 09 = 3Su COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE' AFF) CE CF ENV?RONTVIENTAL AFFAaRS DEPARTMENT OF ENviRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONZ WINTER STREET, BOSTON' MA 02108 617.292.5600 JAJNE SWIFT , R C Governor e D JqN U 6 1003 OF HF BREwSRD PTER BO Ser tember 20, 2001 e r ,-. ? BOB DUR kNI) Secretary LAUREN A. LISS Commissioner ri 0 N Re: Application for BRP WP 64b APPROVAL OF AN A-LTERNATIVE SYSTEM FOR PELOTING USE Proposed installation of a Nor -eco Singulair Model 960 DN Three Bedroom Single Family Home, Lot 16 and Lot 16A, ter, MA DBP Transmittal NLrnber. W029848 00 the Depa„rnent has received your application dated ruly 29, 2002 ar±d completed a review for approval of an alternative on-site sewage disposal system (System) for piloting use in accordance with 310 CIVM 15.000 at the above referenced location. Q The submittal includes a plan, prepared by Dermarest, -McLellan Engineering entitled "Site and Sewage Plan Location Brewster, MA" dated 3/15/02 and most recently revised 4/22/02. Your application was approved in a letter, dated July 25, 2002, by the Brewster Health Departrnetit. The proposed System specifies the installation of a Norweeo Singulair Model 960 DN alternative on- site sewage treatuicrit system to treat 330 gallons per day (GPD) design f'tow, for a proposed three- bedroom house on two contiguous lots (Lot 16 and Lot 16A), totaling 20,014 square feet in Brewster, MA.. The proposed home is iodated in a defined Title S nitrogen sensitive area (Zonae II). An engineer[[ of the Department has reviewed this application for approval in accordance with Title 5, 310 CMR 15.000. Based on its review of the application, the Department bas determined that the above referenced location with a three-bedroom house, located within a nitrogen sensitive area, will be a suitable testing facility to evaluate nitrogen reduction to'a concentration of 19rrng/L. T his project is approved consistent with the RENEWAL OF PILOTING APPROVAL 'for the Norweco Singulair Model 960 DN, Transmittal Number: W107694, issued August 17, 2001, to Siegmund Environmental Services, Inc. (the Company). As part of the Piloting Approval of this alternative system for nitrogen reduction, the Department requires the applicant and all subsequent entities to comply with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall comply with all requirements of the Department's Renewal of Pillotinz ApPrOvall for the Norweco Singulair Model 960 DN, issued August 17, 2001. A copy of this Approval is inclosed. In the This information is available In alterove format by canine our ADA Coordinator at (617) 57d-.4872. QEP on the Worid Wide Web- trop'11WWN.state.ma.us/dep e! Printedon Recvded Paoer Jan S. 2003 11:10AM REEF REALTY LTD No.3119 P. 3/6 W029848 9/20/2002 Pagc 2 of 4 event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of this System Approval and the'Piloting Approval, the letter shall be controlling. 1 Tho cover of the distribution box shall be installed and maintained at grade to facilitate sampling and morkitorigg of the effluent. The owner shall have the System maintained in accordance with Section IV of the Rengwal of Pilotin iz roval for the Norweco Singuiair Model 960 DN. Additionally, the owner must subrtut a copy of the "DLP .Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 UA Treatment and Disposal Systems" and Singulair Sence checklist to the Department and the Brewster Board of Health within 45 days of each inspection. A certified operator of an appropriate grade must complete each form. Copies of these forms are enelosed_ 4. At least 30 days prior to System startup, the owner shall submit to the Department and the Brewster Board of Health a copy of an operation and maintenance agreement. The initial operation and maintenance agreement shall be for no less than -18 months with the Company or its qualified subcontractor. Subsequent operation and maintenance agreements shall be for no less than one year with any person or ftm qualified to provide services consistent with the System's specifications, the operation and maintenance requirements specified by the designer and those specified by the Department in this approval letter. The operation and maintenance agreement shall contain the name of the System operator who will operate the System, which shall be an appropriate Massachusetts certified operator, or operators as required by 257 CIMR 2.00. Any time the operator is changed, the owner shall notify the Department and the Brewster Board of Health in writing within seven days of such change. . . Prior to the Brewster Board of Health's issuance of a Certificate of Compliance, the, owner shall submit to the Department and the Board of Health a copy of a sampling agreement with the Company, including a sampling schedule. Subsequent sampling agreements shall be for no less than one year and shall be with a Massachusetts certified operator of the appropriate grade. At a minimum, the following effluent grab sampling and testing schedule is required for year round residential use by the Piloting Approval for the System for the first l 8 months: Parameter IE'Xec<uency Effluent Limits PH Monthly for the first 6 months 6-9 Quarterly thereafter i Carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBODs) Monthly for the first 6 months Quarterly thereafter < 3Q mg/L' Total suspended solids (TSS) Monthly for the first 6 months 5 30 mg/L Quarterly thereafter Total nitrogen O'DO Monthly for the first, 6 months s 1; mg/L (TN=TKN + NO2 + 1403) Quarterly thereafter Alkalinity Monthly for the first 6 months NA. Quarterly thereafter Flow Monthly for the first 6 months Water meter reading Quarterly thereafter 1- mg/L= milligrams per liter MUM BEGIS18Y Ur t,ccuu Jan. S. 2003 11:11AM REEF REALTY LTD W029949 9/23/2002 Page 3 of 4 No -3119 P. 4%6 A. During the first 18 months of operation, excluding the first three months of startup operations, if the effluent concentration from the System exceeds the applicable TN, BOD, or TSS limit on two consecutive sampling events, the Company shall within 60 days submit a report to the Department and Board of Health explaining the reasons for • the exceedances with recommendations for operational or design changes to prevent future violations. B After eighteen months of monitoring, if the System is approved as acceptable by the Department in accordance with Section TV item 9 and 10 of the Department's Rene - Piloting Approval for the Norweco Singulair Model 960 DN, issued August 17, 2001 and at the written request of the owner, the Department may reduce the monitoring requirements. C. The owner in cooperation with the Company shall submit all monitoring data to the Board of health and the Department within 45 days of the scrupling date accompanied by the DEP inspection form and Singulair Service checklist. The Department submittal shall be to: Department of Environmental Protection, Watershed.Permittinf Program One Winter Street -6 Floor Boston, MA 02108 Attn: Title 5 Program 6. The owner shall record in the appropriate registry of deeds a notice that discloses the existence of this Piloting Approved alternative system and the involvement of the Department in the approval of the System. Prior to the Brewster Board of Health's issuance of a Certificate of Compliance for the System, the owner shall both rdcord the notice in the registry ,and submit a certified registry copy of said notice showing book and page number to the Department and the Board of Health. 7. Prior to the sale of the facility, the owner shall notify the new owner of the presence of the Alternative System and provide a copy of this approval to the new owner. 8. The owner shall submit to the Department a copy of the Certificate of Compliance for the System witlun 14 days of the Board of Health's issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 9. Should the Sys�m fail or exhibit signs of imminent failure as determined by the Department or the Brewster Board` of Health, the owner and the Company shall take,any action as deemed appropriate by the Department or the 13oard of Health. A failed system is defined izt Tide 5 as a system that fails to protect public health and safety and the environroent, including but not limited to, any system failing as set forth in 310 CMR 15.303. 10. A copy of the plans must be kept onsite at all times both during and after construction. 8WISIAB aE REGGiSTRY 0f Dttus Jan. 6. 2003 11:11AM REEF REALTY LTD vo 3119 P. 5!6 W029848 9/20/2002 Page 4 of 4 Should you have any questions regardixtg this matter, ple= do not hesitate to contact Ron White at (617) 292-5790. Sjn�ly, Sharon M. Pe osi, Director Watershed Permitting Program. Enclosures (3) cc: DEF SERO, Brian Dudley Brewster Board of Health Thomas ;McLellan, P.E., P.O. Box 463, West DeTmis, W 02670 Siegmund Environmental Services, Inc., 49 Pavilion Avenue, Providence, Rl 02905 BISTABLE REGISTRY Of UELUb W FREEMANS JrAr a gD 10 � � LOCUS ASSESSORS MAP: 47 PARCEL: 93 Nf CURRENT ZONING: RL ENCIA EER: THOMAS McLELLAN, P.E. BUILDING SETBACKS: WITNESS: DEBRA HAWKS R.S. F: 30' S.- 20' R: 2O' DATE 2-26-02 PERCOLATION RATE: < 2 MIN/IN FLOOD ZONE; C TH-' TH-2 T I'ST .SOLE LOGS LOCATION MAP LOT 16 19,264 t S.F. (0.44 t AC.) LOT A 750 SF TOTAL AREA 20,Q14 SF Y j( 6ti J•' _ A f1 OF ql./ 8� A- y DM 82 DEMAREST•--MCLELLAN ENGINEERING 24 SCHOOL STREET P.O. BOX 463 WEST DENNIS. MASSACHUSETTS 02670 PHONE & FAX : (508) 398-7710 DM # 02-02 135 BENCHMARK AT HYD. WATER GATE ELEVATION = 85.63 D AD a 88 iy �� i r EX EliL1�G -- ,r r _ 8G • - � •, � i - ag �90 3 3 f EI'1'14- 81 t y ,y DIT L EIVCHMARK Ar WOOD �R •'SIL, N' \ ELEVATIONL= 9025 ` c' -90 + y � 82 , ` ti y y � 6 iOO 06 84 LOT A 750 SF SEE SUBDIVISION PLAN BY OTHERS 25c? 78.s' NO GROUND HATER ENCOUNTERED GROUND If A3 ER TABLE MAP OF BREWSTER & HARWICH (1987) SHOW GROUFD HATER AT ELEVATION = 32, APPROX. 50' DEEP SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN NOTES. 1. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED FROM QUAD (NGVD+/-) 2. MUNICAPAL WATER IS AVAILABLE. 3. SCHEDULE 40 - 4" PVC PIPE TO BE USED THROUGHOUT SEPTIC SYSTEM. . 4. ALL PRECAST UNITS TO CONFORM WITH AASHTO H-10 LOADING SPECIFICATIONS. 5. PIPE PITCH= 114" PER FOOT, (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE). 6. FIRST 2' OF PIPE OUT OF D -BOX TO BE SET LEVEL. 7. THE SEPTIC SYSTEM! HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED TD ACCOMODATE THE USE OF A GARBAGE DISPOSAL. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE OF MASS. ENVIRONMENTAL CODE (TITLE FIVE) AND LOCAL HEALTH REGULATIONS. 9. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. GROUND COVER OVER ALL SEPTIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS NOT TO EXCEED 3.0'. 11. NORWECO SINGULAIR MODEL 960 DN (500 GPD) AND TANK TO REPLACE SEPTIC TANK TO OBTAIN 3rd BEDROOM IN ZONE 2. SYSTEM TO BE PRE - ASSEMBLED BY MANUFACTURER (SIEGMUND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., 49 PAVILION AVE., PROVIDENCE, RI 02905). SEE MANUFACTURERS SPECS AND DEP PILOTING APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED, AUGUST 17, 2001. FLOWf TIMATE: E )ROOMS AT 110 GAL/DAY/BEDROOM = 330 GAL/DAY SEPTIC TANK WITH NORWECO SINGULAIR MODEL 960 DN (500 GPD) 33D G.AL f DAY x 2 DAYS = 660 GAL - - - --- USE _�'300 GALLON SINGULAIR TANK LEACHI,VG AREA: USE INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS (MODEL 3050) FRITH 3.5' QI' STONE ALL AROUND (29.5'x 11.2'x 2' DEEP) SIDI AREA. 29.5 + 11.2)2 x 2 = 163 (.74) = 121 CAL/DAY BOT7 0M AREA 29.5' x 11.2' = 330 SF (74) = 244 7ALI11DAY DAY CAPACITY =365 SEPTIC SYSTEM SECTION FRESH AIR VENT COVERS TO BE ABOVE x 24' PROPOSED 24' 3 BEDROOM 38' D!'ELLI NG GAR. /] JO' 24' 4' PROPOSED DWELLING 2" PEASTONE FINISHED GRADE FOR 314" - 1 112" _ 87.0 MAINTENANCE AND DOUBLE WASHED STONE r+ INSPECTION ACCESS ' OP OF FOUNDATION 3' MAX. zz"_ 14" MAX COVER COVER ViT _L15" DIAM. PVC 12 -24 T � ELEV.= 82.0 82.3 qE oEV. � /ELEV: -81.7 D -BOX 81.6 79.5 �NORWECO SINGULAIR' ELEV. ELEV. �� --� ELEV. (�� OF 81-5V-_13.5' 3.5' (MODEL 960 DN (5O0 GPD)29.5' 84.0 (PRE -ASSEMBLED STONE ELEV. ELEV. Y MANU�'ACT-URER) 'R) 3 INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS (MODEL 3050) WITH 3.5' OF STONE ALL AROUND (6" OF STONE UNDER OR � o CIRCULARE-CIRCIO E a rloN (25.5' x 11.2' x 2' DEEP) (H-20) MECHANICALLY COMPACTED) OF EFFLUENT TANK INLET, SEE SPECS) rr KEY: EXISTING CONTOUR: - PROPOSED CONTOUR: ...... EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION: 25.5 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION: 25 TEST HOLE: UTILITY POLE: -0- FENCE LINE: HYDRANT: -6- RETAINING WALL. TREE: 0 APPROVED BY: ATE: CIVIL MD. WfI Ill, 11, '1�Y1"1�12= - THOMAS McL LLAN, P.E. JOHN Z. DEM[AREST JR., PL.S. SITE AND SEWAGE PLAN - _ BREWSTER, MA PREPARED FOR: REEF REALTY SCALE: I"= 30' DATE: 3115102 REFERENCE: PLAN BOOK 180 PAGE 125 REVISED: 3-25-02 (LOT A) REVISED: 4-22-02 (SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION) 87.0 86.0 0/A HORIZ ) N Of A HORIZON ELEV. ELEV. LOAMY SAIV D LOAMY SAND fOYR 4/3 86.6 4" IOYR 4/3 B HORIZON 86,7 B HORIZON LOAMY SAND LOAMY SAND 30" YOYR 5/8 84.5 24" IOYR 5/8 84.0 C HORIZON C HORIZON UM S., ND EDI T M SAND 2MEDI5Y 2 78.s' NO GROUND HATER ENCOUNTERED GROUND If A3 ER TABLE MAP OF BREWSTER & HARWICH (1987) SHOW GROUFD HATER AT ELEVATION = 32, APPROX. 50' DEEP SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN NOTES. 1. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED FROM QUAD (NGVD+/-) 2. MUNICAPAL WATER IS AVAILABLE. 3. SCHEDULE 40 - 4" PVC PIPE TO BE USED THROUGHOUT SEPTIC SYSTEM. . 4. ALL PRECAST UNITS TO CONFORM WITH AASHTO H-10 LOADING SPECIFICATIONS. 5. PIPE PITCH= 114" PER FOOT, (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE). 6. FIRST 2' OF PIPE OUT OF D -BOX TO BE SET LEVEL. 7. THE SEPTIC SYSTEM! HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED TD ACCOMODATE THE USE OF A GARBAGE DISPOSAL. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE OF MASS. ENVIRONMENTAL CODE (TITLE FIVE) AND LOCAL HEALTH REGULATIONS. 9. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. GROUND COVER OVER ALL SEPTIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS NOT TO EXCEED 3.0'. 11. NORWECO SINGULAIR MODEL 960 DN (500 GPD) AND TANK TO REPLACE SEPTIC TANK TO OBTAIN 3rd BEDROOM IN ZONE 2. SYSTEM TO BE PRE - ASSEMBLED BY MANUFACTURER (SIEGMUND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., 49 PAVILION AVE., PROVIDENCE, RI 02905). SEE MANUFACTURERS SPECS AND DEP PILOTING APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED, AUGUST 17, 2001. FLOWf TIMATE: E )ROOMS AT 110 GAL/DAY/BEDROOM = 330 GAL/DAY SEPTIC TANK WITH NORWECO SINGULAIR MODEL 960 DN (500 GPD) 33D G.AL f DAY x 2 DAYS = 660 GAL - - - --- USE _�'300 GALLON SINGULAIR TANK LEACHI,VG AREA: USE INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS (MODEL 3050) FRITH 3.5' QI' STONE ALL AROUND (29.5'x 11.2'x 2' DEEP) SIDI AREA. 29.5 + 11.2)2 x 2 = 163 (.74) = 121 CAL/DAY BOT7 0M AREA 29.5' x 11.2' = 330 SF (74) = 244 7ALI11DAY DAY CAPACITY =365 SEPTIC SYSTEM SECTION FRESH AIR VENT COVERS TO BE ABOVE x 24' PROPOSED 24' 3 BEDROOM 38' D!'ELLI NG GAR. /] JO' 24' 4' PROPOSED DWELLING 2" PEASTONE FINISHED GRADE FOR 314" - 1 112" _ 87.0 MAINTENANCE AND DOUBLE WASHED STONE r+ INSPECTION ACCESS ' OP OF FOUNDATION 3' MAX. zz"_ 14" MAX COVER COVER ViT _L15" DIAM. PVC 12 -24 T � ELEV.= 82.0 82.3 qE oEV. � /ELEV: -81.7 D -BOX 81.6 79.5 �NORWECO SINGULAIR' ELEV. ELEV. �� --� ELEV. (�� OF 81-5V-_13.5' 3.5' (MODEL 960 DN (5O0 GPD)29.5' 84.0 (PRE -ASSEMBLED STONE ELEV. ELEV. Y MANU�'ACT-URER) 'R) 3 INFILTRATOR CHAMBERS (MODEL 3050) WITH 3.5' OF STONE ALL AROUND (6" OF STONE UNDER OR � o CIRCULARE-CIRCIO E a rloN (25.5' x 11.2' x 2' DEEP) (H-20) MECHANICALLY COMPACTED) OF EFFLUENT TANK INLET, SEE SPECS) rr KEY: EXISTING CONTOUR: - PROPOSED CONTOUR: ...... EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION: 25.5 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION: 25 TEST HOLE: UTILITY POLE: -0- FENCE LINE: HYDRANT: -6- RETAINING WALL. TREE: 0 APPROVED BY: ATE: CIVIL MD. WfI Ill, 11, '1�Y1"1�12= - THOMAS McL LLAN, P.E. JOHN Z. DEM[AREST JR., PL.S. SITE AND SEWAGE PLAN - _ BREWSTER, MA PREPARED FOR: REEF REALTY SCALE: I"= 30' DATE: 3115102 REFERENCE: PLAN BOOK 180 PAGE 125 REVISED: 3-25-02 (LOT A) REVISED: 4-22-02 (SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION) 6-22-23 Includes redline changes from official Title 5 version for Natural Resource Nitrogen Sensitive Areas amendments, incorporating changes at draft stage and since the public comment period to final 310 CMR 15.000: THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE, TITLE 5: STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITING, CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION, UPGRADE AND EXPANSION OF ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND FOR THE TRANSPORT AND DISPOSAL OF SEPTAGE SUBPART C: DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, AND REPLACEMENT OF ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS 15.201: Type of System 15.213: Construction in Velocity Zones and Floodways 15.214: Nitrogen Leading r unit +;^ Designation of Nitrogen Sensitive Areas 15.215: Designation of Nitrogen Sensitive meas itro en Loadin =Limitations 15.216: Aggregate Determinations of Flows and Nitrogen Loadings SUBPART A: GENERAL PROVISIONS AND ENFORCEMENT 15.002: Definitions For the purposes of 310 CMR 15.000, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Terms expressed in the singular shall be construed to incorporate the plural, and vice versa, unless the context otherwise requires. Alternative Systems - Systems designed to provide or enhance on site sewage disposal which either do not contain all of the components of an on site disposal system constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255 or which contain components in addition to those specified in 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255 and which are proposed to the Local Approving Authority and/or the Department, or an agent authorized by the Department, for remedial, pilot, provisional, or general use approval pursuant to 310 CMR 15.280 through 15.289. Bedroom - A room providing privacy, intended primarily for sleeping and consisting of all of the following: (a) floor space of no less than 70 square feet; (b) for new construction, a ceiling height of no less than seven feet three inches; (c) for existing houses and for mobile homes, a ceiling height of no less than seven feet zero inches; (d) an electrical service and ventilation; and (e) at least one window. Living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, halls, bathrooms, unfinished cellars and unheated storage areas over garages are not considered bedrooms. Single family dwellings shall be presumed to have at least three bedrooms. Where the total number of rooms for single family dwellings exceeds eight, not including bathrooms, hallways, unfinished cellars and unheated storage areas, the number of bedrooms presumed shall be calculated by dividing the total number of rooms by two then rounding down to the next lowest whole number. The applicant may design a system using design flows for a smaller number of bedrooms than are presumed in this definition by granting to the Approving Authority a deed restriction limiting the number of bedrooms to the smaller number. Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology — (a.) An alternative system(s) which has a Total Nitrogen effluent Performance value of 10 m /L or less and is certified by the Department for general use pursuant to 310 CMR 15.288 when the Disposal System Construction Permit application is filed and has been approved for the type and design flow of the facilit • where it is to be used,• or (b) If no such alternative s} stem] s> meeting 10 mg/L or less has received general use approval at the time the Disposal System Construction Permit application is filed, then an alternative system(s) with the lowest Total Nitrop-en effluent performance value certified by the Department for general use when the Disposal System Construction Permit application is filed and has been approved for the type and design flow of the facility where it is to be used,• or lc1 An alternative systemtsl granted provisional approval by the Department pursuant to 310 CMR 15.286 or an alternativesystem(s) a2proved by the Department for Piloting pursuant to 310 CMR 15.285iprovided that for an alternative systems Vranted provisional approval or an alternativesystem(s) approved for Viloting such system(s) is aRproved for the twice and design flow of the facility and has a Total Nitrogen performance value less than or equal to 10 mg/L: or._ if no sN stem(s ) with a Total Nitrogen performance value less than or equal to 10 mg/L has received general use approval. then a systems with a Total Nitrogen effluent performance value less than or ec ual to the lowest alternatives stems certified by the Department for general use iiursuant to 310 CMR 15.288 when the Disposal System Construction Permit application is filed. Biological Mat - A layer composed of microorganisms and organic material located below a soil absorption system which forms on the infiltrative surface of soil and which provides biological treatment of septic tank effluent. Emergency Repair - The repair of a system which is necessary to prevent sewage backup into a building, surface breakout of sewage, or to alleviate an imminent danger to public health, safety or the environment in accordance with 310 CMR 15.353. Environmental Justice (EJ) Population - a A Neighborhood that meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. the annual median household income is not more than 65% of the statewide annual median household income: 2. minorities comprise 40% or more of the population; 3. 25% or more of households lack English langua-Lproficienca 4. minorities comprise 25% or more of the population and the annual median household income of the municipality in which the neighborhood is located does not exceed 150% of the statewide annual median household income; or fb) a geo«ra hic portion of a Neighborhood designated by the Secreta as an Environmental Justice Population pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30. r 62 rovided. however, that a Neighborhood or a geographic portion of a Neighborhood that the Secretary has determined shall not be designated an Environmental Justice Population pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30. 4 62 shall not be considered an Environmental Justice Po )ulation under 310 CMR 15.000. EPA - The United States Environmental Protection A:,enc\ Equalization Basin - A watertight tank or basin of sufficient size that has the capacity to store at a minimum the proposed daily design flows for the facility. Local Upgrade Approval - An approval granted by the Approving Authority allowing the owner or operator of a-xistinL, neneenf Fmin -system, including a nonconforming system, e L-Kist"gto perform an upgrade of thate- noneonf Fming system to the maximum feasible extent, all in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 15.401 through 15.405. Maintenance - All activities required to assure the effective and continuous operation and performance of an on-site system including, but not limited to, solids and scum removal from the septic tank, grease trap, dosing chamber or pump chamber and, re -leveling the distribution box, but not including a system upgrade. Massacnusetts Estuary Project Report or MEP Report — A technical report produced by the Massachusetts Estuaries Project that has been accepted by the Department and was created to: determine current nitrogen loads to estuaries: evaluate reductions that would be necessa L to support healthy ecosystems based on a linked model to evaluate nitrogen inputs to estuaries, and provide technical guidance to support appropriate wastewater, watershed. and emba went management techniques to reduce nitrogen loading. Mobile Home - A single transportable structure on a chassis designed to be used, with or without a permanent foundation, as a dwelling. The support system of a mobile home is constructed so that the mobile home may be moved from time to time. Nitrogen Sensitive Area - An area of land and/or natural resource area so designated by the Department in accordance with 310 CMR 15.214-5. Nonconforming System - Any system which is not in full compliance with the standards and requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 and for which a variance or local upgrade approval has not been obtained. Nonconforming systems include, but are not limited to, cesspools, privies, failed systems, and systems with a design flow above 10,000 gpd. Notice of Intent and Application Period — The two-year period that begins on the effective date of a Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214(1)ibl. Saturated Zone - Any portion of the earth below the land surface where available openings (pore, fissure, joint or solution cavity) are filled with water. Scientific Evaluation — A watershed assessment that is accepted by the lieparnment uecause it is scientifically rigorous and based upon information. data, modeling. and that could be used to: a I delineate the watershed. b I develop and im lement an EPA -approved TMDL, and c develop and implement wastewater and nutrient management plans to satisfy the TMDL; and which produces, at a minimum. the following: 1. quantitative and qualitative assessments of the nutrient related health of the waterbodies being assessed 2 identification of all controllable and uncontrollable nutrient sources and their respective contributions to the waterbodies for the present day and the next 20 years, including any rolected buildout; 3. nutrient threshold concentrations that must be achieved to comply with 314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water Oualiri, Standards to support the ecosystem and restore and maintain indicator habitats such as eel -grass and benthic species, associated with nitrogen impacts: 4. anal ses of watershed nutrient loading reductions that will be necessary to achieve at least the minimum nutrient threshold concentrations in the waterbody and restore and maintain the indicator habitats: and 5. site-specific. calibrated. watershed-waterbody models that can be used to simulate the efficacy of strateg ie 3 towards restoration and maintenance of the waterbodies. A TMDL is not required to comj}lett. the Scientific Evaluation. Scum - A mass of light solids, such as hair, grease, oils and soaps, floating on the surface of the wastewater in a septic tank. Title 5 of the State Environmental Code 310 CMR 15.000 - The Department's regulation for the siting, construction, inspection, upgrade and expansion of on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems and for the transport and disposal of septage. Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL — The sum of a receiving water's individual waste load allocations and load allocations and natural background, which. toUether with a margin of safety that takes into account an), ck of knowledge concerning the relationshi between effluent limitations and water guality. represents the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbod% can receive and still meet water quality standards in all seasons. Training Contact Hours (TCS — The hours of training a person has had prior to the renewal of either a soil evaluator or system inspector approval. Each seminar, workshop, training course, or college course will have a specific training hour value as rated by the Department or an agent authorized by the Department. Upgrade - The modification of one or more components of an on-site system or the design and construction of a new on-site system which is intended to bring an existint: system, including a nonconforming system into conformance with 310 CMR 15.000. An emergency repair is not an upgrade. Watershed - Any region or area measured in a horizontal topographic divide which directs water runoff from precipitation, normally by gravity, into a stream, a body of impounded surface water, or a coastal embayment, or any region or area measured by a groundwater divide which directs groundwater into a stream, a body of impounded surface water, or a coastal embayment. Watershed Permit — A permit issued by the Department pursuant to 314 CMR 21.00. including the Pleasant Bav Watershed Permit Permit No. 001-01 that was issued August 3. 2018. by the Department prior to the promulgation of 314 CMR 21.00. Water Supply Well - Any public or private source of groundwater used for human consumption, including but not limited to, a source approved for such use by the local Board of Health or the Department in accordance with M.G.L. c. 111, § 122A or 310 CMR 22.00: Drinking Water. NOTE TO REVIEWERS: MassDEP is not proposing any changes to the remainder of Subpart A. These provisions have been omitted. SUBPART B: SITING OF SYSTEMS :VOTE TO REVIEWERS: MassDEP is not proposing any changes to Sections 15.100 through 15.106. These provisions have been omitted. 15.107: Hydrogeolo ig c Properties (1) The hydrogeologic properties of the proposed disposal area shall be identified and recorded on the evaluation form with respect to the following: (a) estimated direction of ground -water flow; (b) high ground -water elevation; (c) estimated depth to bedrock if a factor in design of proposed system, or actual depth if encountered during deep observation hole tests; (d) depth of unsaturated zone, including any perched water tables; (e) drainage classification of dominant soil type as defined by NRCS; (f) lateral distance to surface water and wetland delineation; (g) location of every water supply, public and private, 1. within 400 feet of the proposed system location in the case of surface water supplies and gravel packed public water supply wells, 2. within 250 feet of the proposed system location in the case of tubular public water supply wells, and 3. within 150 feet of the proposed system location in the case of private water supply wells; (h) approximate safe yield or design capacity of every public water supply, if information is available; and (i) identification of proposed disposal area in relation to the location of nitrogen sensitive areas designated pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214-5. (2) When observation wells are appropriate or necessary to determine the hydrogeologic properties of a site or region, such as direction of ground -water flow, perched ground -water tables and seasonal ground -water elevation fluctuations, the general guide for the proper use and installation of ground -water observation wells provided in Department guidance shall be followed. SUBPART C: DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, AND REPLACEMENT OF ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS 15.202: Use of Recirculating Sand Filters (1) A recirculating sand filter ("RSF") or equivalent alternative technology approved by the Department in accordance with 310 CMR 15.280 through 15.288 is a required component of all systems designed to serve a facility or facilities with a design flow of 2,000 gpd or more to be located in a Nitrogen Sensitive Area, as designated in 310 CMR 15.214(1 )(a), provided that such RSF shall not be required for a facility for which subdivision approval has been obtained to construct dwellings with a cumulative total design flow of 2,000 gpd or greater if a disposal system construction permit to construct a system with a total design flow of less than 2,000 gpd in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 on each of the subdivision lots to be served by a system is obtained and such separate subdivision lots are to be conveyed to independent owners. (2) A recirculating sand filter or equivalent alternative technology approved by the Department in accordance with 310 CMR 15.280 through 15.288, may be used to enhance nitrogen removal in systems in Nitrogen Sensitive Areas dcs ted Pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214( I)w. in accordance with 310 CMR 15.217 (Systems with Enhanced Nitrogen Removal) (3) Recirculating sand filters designed and approved in accordance with Department guidance are certified for general use. (4) Recirculating sand filters or equivalent alternative technology shall meet the following requirements: (a) effluent discharge concentrations shall meet or exceed secondary treatment standards of 30 mg/L BOD[5] and 30 mg/L TSS. The effluent pH range shall be 6.0 to 9.0. (b) total nitrogen concentration in the effluent shall not exceed 25 mg/L. (c) system owners shall have effluent quality monitored quarterly for systems serving a facility with a design flow of less than 2,000 gallons per day, and both influent and effluent quality monitored quarterly for systems serving a facility with a design flow of 2,000 gallons per day or greater, for BOD[5], TSS, pH and total nitrogen, unless otherwise required or approved by the Department. Unless otherwise required by the Department, the system owner shall submit all monitoring results to the local Approving Authority and the Department by January 31 <st> of each year for monitoring conducted during the previous calendar year. (d) recirculating sand filter systems shall contain all components of a standard on-site system and be capable of functioning as a conventional system. Any departures from this provision require written approval from the Department. (e) the system owner shall notify the local Approving Authority of any system failure within 24 hours of detection of such failure. (0 pressure distribution, in accordance with 310 CMR 15.254, is required for all systems serving a facility with a design flow of 2,000 gallons per day or greater. Pressure distribution systems shall be designed in accordance with Department guidance. (g) for systems serving a facility with a design flow of 2,000 gpd or greater, the separation from high groundwater as required under 310 CMR 15.212 shall be calculated after adding the effect of groundwater mounding to the high groundwater elevation as determined pursuant to 310 CMR 15.103(3). (h) by January 31<st> of each year, unless otherwise determined by the Department, the system must be inspected at least annually by a Massachusetts certified operator of an appropriate grade to operate the system, unless the Department has approved in writing a reduction in frequency of inspection or the facility is subject to a Department approved comprehensive local plan of on-site system inspection, the system owner shall submit a certification by the system operator to the local Approving Authority and the Department for the previous calendar year stating that the system and its components are functioning as designed and were inspected in accordance with the Department's approval. (i) an operation and maintenance manual shall be prepared by the system designer or a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer and submitted as part of the application. 15.214: Nitr- j4e T ,.,thin L imit..fi NitfeRen Leading Designation of Nitrogen Sensitive Areas 1 The following areas have been determined by the Department to be particularly sensitive to the dischar,,e of pollutants from on-site sewage disposal systems and are therefore designated Nitromen Sensitive Areas: a) Public and private water supply protection areas: 1. Department -approved Zone IIs for wells or wellfields used by )ublic waters stems as defined in 310 CMR 22.02 and in the absence of a De )artment-a > >roved Zone lI the Interim Wellhead Protection Area t IWPA) for a public water system's well or wellfield as defined in 310 CMR 22.02: and 2. aAny areas #i � rwhere the use of both anon -site systems and a -wells that ares not regulated as n- public water supplies: under 310 CMR 22.00: Drinkin Water serve facilities. (b) Natural resource areas: 4—.1. anv watershed to an embavment or sub-embati ment that on July 7. 2023 �efli�efEw date of the is the subject of a nitrogen Total Maximum Daily Load TMDL approved by the EPA and an Area Wide Water Quality Mana ,ement Plan approved by the EPA for Cape Cod in 2015 pursuant to Section 208 of the Federal _Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. � 1251 et. Seq. ("208 Plan")addressing nitro en pollution. For an such watershed that is subject to an approved nitrogen TMDL and an approved 208 Plan as of July 7 2023 the effective date of designation is July 7 2023re'i eve date fi-e gyI� A. A Nitrogen Sensitive Area desi nation for watersheds subject to the 208 Plan that receive an EPA-aenroved TMDL after July 7. 2023 becomes effective on the date EPA approves the TMDL. 4—. 2. am watershed to an emba yment or sub-embayment subject to the 208 Plan as of Jul° 7, 2023 that the Department designates as a Nitrogen Sensitive Area after a public review process based on: ab. a Massachusetts Estuary Prosect Report demonstrating nitrogen impacts: or c -b. a Scientific Evaluation demonstfatings nitrogen impacts. Nitrogen impacts include but are not limited to: 1 nitrogen related eutro hication• ' nitro =en related adverse ecological and habitat impacts, LD:nitrogen concentrations that would cause or contribute to impairment of existing or designated uses pursuant to 314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts Sur ace Water Malin- Standards_ or f nitro en concentrations that exceed site-specific criteria developed b the Department pursuant to 314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts Sur ace Water Iualih, Standards, The Department may accept a Scientific Evaluation commenced prior to the effective date of these regulations. If the Scientific Evaluation will not be conducted by or on behalf of the Department. a sco .ie of work for the proposed Scientific Evaluation shall be submitted to the Department for its review and approval before the evaluation commences. by: i. submitting a draft scope of work for the Scientific Evaluation in accordance with the Department's guidelines ii. within 21 days of submitting the draft scope of work to the Department, lacing a public notice in the Environmental Monitor that the draft scope of work has been submitted to the Department for review and approval: iii. conducting; a ioint Pre -scoping meeting with the Department and appropriate re presentatives of the municipalities within the evaluation area to discuss the proposed scope of work and set a timeline for routine update meetings; and i iv. submitting to the Department a copy of the public notice published in the Environmental Monitor: a proposed final scope of work for DeRartment review, and a proposed plan and website to provide periodic informational updates regarding the Scientific Evaluation process to the communit ies that may be affected. (2) A public review process shall precede a final Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214 1 b 2. and shall include at a minimum. the followinE: a) Public Notice. The Department shall provide public notice of its intent to formally designate the Nitro en Sensitive Area. Public notice shall afford a public comment period of at least 60 days after the date of publication in the Environmental Monitor. The Department may elect to extend the public comment period. If the Department provides such an extension the Department shall post notice thereof on the Department's website and provide electronic copies of the notice to anyone who requests it. (b) The Department shall publish public notice of the intended designation in the Environmental Monitor and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution both online and in hardcopy, if hardcopy exists within the area that may be affected b, � the ,designation. The Department will request that notice be published in the local town or city hall and on the website of the community or communities that may be affected. The Department will also post notice on the Department's web a e. In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where the 12recedia method for publishing_ public notice does not specifically serve the Environmental Justice Population) s ), public notice shall be provided by the Department to at least one additional news organization that primarily serves the Environmental Justice Population(s) within the area that may be affected by the designation. The public notice shall be translated into other languages that are prevalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiency. (c) The Department shall send a copy of th rublic notice to the chief municipal elected official and the Board of Health of any municipality that may be affected by the intended designation. d The public notice shall contain the following minimum information and any additional information the Department deems appropriate: 1. identification of the watershed or sub -watershed to be addressed by the intended designation; 2. a link to a website that includes a detailed factual and scientific basis and regulatory rationale explaining how the watershed satisfies the criteria for the intended designation under 310 CMR 15.214 1 b 2.• and 3. the time within which the public may comment or request a public hearing- e) Public Hearings. If the Department determines a public hearing to be in the public interest. then the Department shall schedule and conduct such hearing in a community within the area that may be affected by the desi nation. Public notice of the . ublic hearin shall be )published in the same manner as the public notice for the public continent period. When a public hearing is held. the public comment period shall be extended to the conclusion of the public hearing or such later date as may be established by the Department. f Determination. After the conclusion of the public comment period, the Department may issue or deny a final designation. which will be published on the Department's website. The effective date of the designation shall be the date of issuance and the r uirements of 310 CMR 15.215 take effect upon that date. t L, ] Appeals. Any person aggrieved by a Department final determination to designate a Nitrop-en Sensitive Area pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214(1)! b12.a. or b. Of -o -and who also participated in the public comment period or public hearing may request an adiudicatory hearing in accordance with 310 CMR 1.00: Ad1udicaton; Proceedin;Qs and M.C.L. c. 3 0 A within 21 days of the designation's issuance but only with respect to whether there is a sufficient factual or scientific basis for the Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation under 310 CMR 15.214(1 b 2.a. or b.or- s. Participating in the public comment period or public hearing means verbally commenting during, the public hearing or -submitting written_ information to the De . artment prior to close of the public comment period. 15.215: r' tion fNit , Sensitive AFeas, 1 5�NitroLen Loading Limitations The necessity of providing increased treatment of pollutants and reduction in nutrients dischar *ed from on-site sewage dis osal s stems. in areas designated as nitrogen sensitive areas warrants the imposition of the followin nitro en loading limitations: 1) Public and private water supply protection areas.: No facility owner for New Construction in Nitrogen Sensitive Areas designated in 310 CMR 15.214 1 a shall install a system designed to receive or allow a system to receive more than 440 gallons of design flow Der day ger acre except as set forth in 310 CMR 15.202 use of recirculating sand filters 310 CMR 15.216 (aggregate flows) or 15.217 (enhanced nitrogen removal). 2 Natural resource areas.: Any system serving New Construction or an existing facility in a Nitroi1en Sensitive Area designated pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214 1 b on or after July 7. 2023 . lose "�'• � p �.. ovwuloliogI shall incorporate Best Available Nitrol en ReducingTechnology; . as follows: (a) Existing Systems. The owner of a system serving, or approved to serve, an existing facilit with a CeAi fie ate of QopM jgfj as of the effective date of the Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation shall ungrade the system pursuant to 310 CMR 15.401 through 15.405 to inco orate the Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology within --five years of the date on which the Notice of Intent and Application Period ends of the effective date E)f t4ie 4� unless_ 1. Except as otherwise provided in 310 CMR 15.215.( 2 )f c )4. and 314 CMR 21.12(5 Notice of Intent, a Watershed Permit application. or a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption application is filed for the area during? the Notice of Intent and Application Period pursuant to 310 CMR 15.215(2)(c), 314 CMR 21.03. or 314 CMR 21.12, respectively; or 2.The NitroLen Sensitive Area is subiect to a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption and the facility is within the area covered b : the exem )tion: or 3.The Nitrogen Sensitive Area is subject to a Watershed Permit and -the facility is within the area covered by the permit. and;: a. The Watershed Pennit to which the Nitrogen Sensitive Area is subject specifies that the five-year upgrade requirement has been suspended ,Y,^dified or- w ivt on the basis of permit conditions that ensure at least equivalent nitrogen reductions within the schedule included in the Watershed Permit; or. for Watershed Permits issued before promulgation of 314 CMR 21.00: Massachusetts Watershed Permit Regulations, the -Sfive-near upgrade requirement is waivedsuspended for each permittee's watershed area. unless and until the permit is revoked or terminated. in which case 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) shall go into effect for -ach system in the watershed area of each permittee to whom the revocation or tennination is applicable; and b. The watershed permittees is in com Bance with the terms and conditions of the pen -nit. ( }Ib) New Construction. Beginning six months afterA6-44 the effective date of the Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation any systems serving_ New Construction shall incorporate Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technolo�,:v. The Department willgI t waive suspend this requirement only if: 1. Except as otherwise provided in 310 CMR 15.215(2)(c)4. And 314 CMR 21.12( 5 ), a Notice of Intent. a Watershed Permit application, or a De Minimus Nitrogen Load Exemption application is filed for the area duringy the Notice of Intent and Application Period pursuant to 310 CMR 15.215(2)(c), 314 CMR 21.03. or 314 CMR 21.12. respectively. or 2.The Nitrogen Sensitive Area is subiect to a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption and the facility is within the area covered by the exemption, or 3 The Nitrogen Sensitive Area is the—subiect tom a Watershed Permit and the New Construction is within the area covered by the permit and;: a. The Watershed Permit to which the Nitrogen Sensitive Area is subject specifies that the Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology incorporation requirement has been suspended modified ^r waived on the basis of hermit conditions that ensure nitrogen reductions will be sufficient to offset future additional nitrogen loads from newlv constructed on-site systems: and gib. The watershed permittee(s) is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Watershed Pennit. kd4(c) Notice of Intent and Application Period. 1. The filing of an application for a Watershed Permit or a De Minimis NitEggen Load Exemption or a Notice of Intent to apply for a Watershed Permit during the Notice of Intent and Application Period by a party who could otherwise apply for such permit under 314 CMR 21.00: Massachusetts Watershed Permit Ret ztlatious will prevent commencement of the five-year time period in which Title 5 syste upgrades would otherwise be required under 310 CMR 15.215(2V a). 2. An application for a Watershed Permit or De Minimis Nitrogen Load exemption shall be filed pursuant to 314 CMR 21.03 or 21.12, respectively. A Notice of Intent shall be filed on a form provided by the Department and shall include a proposed schedule with sufficient milestones to be approved by the Department for the filing of a Watershed Permit application and issuance of the pen -nit as soon as practicable but not later than seven years from the applicable Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation under 310 CMR 15.214(111b ) 3. Within twenty-eight days of filing a Notice of Intent. a Watershed Permit application_ or De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption application. the party who filed_ such notice or application must publish notice of its filing and an}• suspension of the Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2)(a) and (b): in the forthcoming Environmental Monitor; on the party's official website: in the town hall where similar notices are published; and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution within the area that maybe affected by the Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements in 310 CMR 15.215(2)(a) and (b). In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where the preceding; method e the Environmental Justice Population(s), the party who filed the Notice of Intent or Watershed Perniit application must publish the preceding notice in at least one additional news organization that primarily serves the Environmental Justice Population(s) within the area that may be affected by the designation. The public notice shall be translated into other languages that are prevalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiency. 4. Aparty's failure to comply with deadlines in a Watershed Permit a )lication schedule in a Notice of Intent approved under 310 CMR 15.215(2)(c}2. will commence the New Construction re uirements and five-year time period for mandatonj upgrades to existin_p systems under 310 CMR 15.215(2)[a) and lb)_ upon issuance of notice from the Department to the noncompliant party. Within twenty ei =ht days of issuing that notice to the noncompliant party. the Del2artment shall publish notice in accordance with the notice publication provisions in 310 CMR 15.215(2)(c)3. that the Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2)(a) and N have been invoked. {}[d} Ternlination or Revocation of Watershed Permit or De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption If a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption or a Watershed Permit is terminated or revoked pursuant to 314 CMR 21.00: Massachusetts Watershed Permit Reyulations for one or more perinittees to the permit. any owner of an existing system or a system to serve New Construction in the designated Nitrogen Sensitive Area pertainiEg either to each permittee whose permit status is tenninated or revoked or to the area that was covered by the De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption. as applicable, shall incorporate Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology. as follows: 1. For existing systems or those with a Disposal System Construction Permit for installation as of the date of the Watershed Permit or De Minimis Nitrot~en Load Exemption termination or revocation. within -5five years of fFem-the date when the Notice of Intent and Application Period would have otherwise ended by its own terms ff etive ,late of the desig., 4o+i or within 2two years €remof the date of termination or revocation of the Watershed Permit or De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption (as applicable). whichever is lon per. 4�2. New systems installed after the effective date of the Watershed Permit or De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption termination or revocation shall incorporate Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology. {f34e1 Notwithstanding 310 CMR 15.215(2,}[a) through d1. the Department may extend any, time limit contained in 310 CMR 15.215 for good cause including but not limited to an insufficient supply of necessary equipment or materials or unavailabilityof contractors'fth site gonditions t an eyiistinv�f ..;1;t., preclude the ; ,-ation of Best Available Nitr-ggen Reducing r h i o gy then the ew7ner- shall uper-ade the system 0. ineamerate alternative hnoje'5, in full-comp4ance with 310 QMR 15.000 t„ the + + F 1,1 daffee tt, 310 !'-M 1 c nnn [ Facility owners that install Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology pursuant to 310 CMR 15.215(2) shall not be required to upgrade to subsequent Best Available Nitrogen Reducin,,,, Technology unless the Approving Authority determines that: the system has failed and is required to be upgraded: there is an alteration to or change in use of the facility that is determined to be New Construction. or the system is failing to protect the public health. safety, and the environment. (g). The Department will maintain and_�ublish a list on its website of Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technologies and nitrogen reducing technologies that have received genes provisional. or piloting approval }ursuant to 310 CMR 15.285 through 15.288. The Department may allow the use of technologies that do not meet the Best Available Nitrogen Reducing_Technolog_y definition in the event of significant supply or market limitations. The Department may prohibit the use of a technology as Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology based on a technology's noncompliance with the performance standards established in the technology's a roval. (h) Facility owners that upgraded their system within the10 years prior to the effective date of the Nitrogen Sensitive Area designation r ffieeti e date of theregulation-4 with Department -approved nitrogen removing g technology are exempt from the individual system upgrade requirements in 310 CMR 15.215(2_y(a) unless the Approving Authority determines that: the system has failed and is required to be upgraded, there is an alteration to or change in use of the facility that is determined to be New Construction. or the system is failing to protect the public health, safety, and the environment. (i) A facilit�� owner of a Wet—system(s). which pursuant to 310 CMR 15.006 serves an existing facility with a desi n flow of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd, shall upgrade the systeml s) pursuant to 310 CMR 15.304 when the facility is in a location designated as a Nitrogen Sensitive Area pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214. (3) The owner of a system serving New Construction in a Nitro, --en Sensitive Area designated in both 310 CMR 15.214(1)(a) and (1)(b) shall comply with the requirements of beth -310 CMR 15.215r'�-;- Q. (4) The owner of a system or proposed system shall ascertain whether the facility is in a designated Nitrogen Sensitive Area. The Dei�artment will are are and make available on the Department's website maps . ortra ing designated Nitrogen Sensitive Areas within the Commonwealth. Prior to any transfer of title for property where the facility is located. the transferor shall disclose to the transferee and Board of Health whether the facility is subject to an upgrade requiring Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology pursuant to 310 CMR 15.215, 15.216: Aggregate Determinations of Flows and Nitrogen Loadings (1) The 440 gallons per day per acre nitrogen loading limitation imposed by 310 CMR 15.244215(l) may be calculated in the aggregate by using nitrogen credit land in accordance with an approved Nitrogen Aggregation Plan or Community Aggregation Plan. Applicants proposing systems to be located within a community or region covered by a Community Aggregation Plan approved by the Department shall calculate aggregate determinations of flows and nitrogen loadings in accordance with the Plan and the Department's Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading. All other applicants seeking aggregate determination of flows and nitrogen loading shall prepare a Facility Aggregation Plan in accordance with 310 CMR 15.216 and the Department's Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading. (2) To qualify as Nitrogen Credit Land, the land must: (a) be within the same Nitrogen Sensitive Area as the facility if the facility is in a Nitrogen Sensitive Area; (b) be within the same subdivision in an area where the use of both on-site systems and drinking water wells are proposed to serve the facility; (c) not have any manmade sources of nitrogen, including, but not limited to, wastewater discharges and nitrogen based fertilizer located thereon; (d) not be used for raising, breeding or keeping of animals; (e) be pervious; (f) be outside of Zone As, Velocity Zones and Regulatory Floodways; (g) not be covered by any surface water body including, but not limited to, a river, stream, lake, pond, or ocean; (h) not be currently designated as nitrogen credit land; and (i) meet the criteria set forth in the Department's Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading. (3) Land located within a Zone I of a public water supply well may be used as nitrogen credit land unless the well is determined to be at risk in accordance with the Department's "Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading" or the proposed design flow is 2,000 gallons per day or greater. (4) Community Aggregation Plans. (a) A city or town may seek Department approval for aggregate determination of flows and nitrogen loading across a region wide area such as, but not limited to, a Zone II of a public water supply well. Department approval of a Community Aggregation Plan may authorize the local Approving Authority to approve site specific facility aggregation plans in accordance with the approved Community Aggregation Plan. (b) The Department may approve a Community Aggregation Plan provided that the following conditions are met: 1. the local Approving Authority has approved the Plan; 2. the Plan contains a mechanism to protect surface and ground water supplies within the community or region from pollutant and nitrogen loading and a proposed mechanism for implementing the Plan; 3. the Plan meets the criteria in the Department's "Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading;" 4. for areas that include a Zone Il, the Plan includes a nitrate loading analysis and nitrate management plan as specified in 310 CMR 22.21(2)(d); and 5. any other conditions that the Department deems appropriate. (5) Facility Aggregation Plans. The Approving Authority may approve a Facility Aggregation Plan provided that the following conditions are met: (a) The proposed facility meets the criteria in the Department's Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading, (b) the design flow of 440 gallons per day per acre equivalency across the facility and other land areas for which nitrogen credit is sought, but not necessarily on every individual acre, will be met through recorded land use restrictions that restrict nitrogen loading on facility land and nitrogen credit land. These land use restrictions must be substantially identical to those contained in the Department's Guidelines for Title 5 Aggregation of Flows and Nitrogen Loading, run in perpetuity, be approved by the respective land owners, run to the benefit of the municipality acting by and through the Local Approving Authority and, in the case of nitrogen credit land, also run to the benefit of the facility land. The applicant shall record or register such restrictions and easements in the appropriate Registry of Deeds or Land Registration Office within 30 days of approval of the plan; and (c) any other conditions that the Approving Authority deems appropriate. 15.217: Systems with Enhanced Nitrogen Removal (1) The nitrogen loading limitations established in 310 CMR 15.214215(1) shall not apply to discharge of an effluent meeting the federal Safe Drinking Water Act nitrate standard of 10 ppm through either an approved alternative system or a treatment works with a groundwater discharge permit issued pursuant to 314 CMR 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program. (2) For systems located in a Nitrogen Sensitive Area designated pursuant to 310 CMR 15.214(1)(a), Aan increase in calculated allowable nutrient loading per acre may be allowed with the use of a technology approved for enhanced nutrient removal pursuant to either the piloting, provisional or general use certification provisions in 310 CMR 15.281 through 15.288 as illustrated by the following example: Recirculating Sand Filter 550 gpd/acre. alln the event that the Department determines that a system approved for enhanced nutrient removal using a technology approved by the Department on a piloting or provisional basis pursuant to 310 CMR 15.285 and 15.286 respectively is not performing in accordance with the approval, the Department or the Local Approving Authority may require the system owner to instead use an enhanced nutrient removal technology that has been certified for general use by the Department. The increased design flow allowed reflects the nutrient removal performance of the approved technology compared to a standard system otherwise described in 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255. A system receiving a design flow credit for enhanced nutrient removal pursuant to 310 CMR 15.217 must still comply with the requirements of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.293 with respect to system siting and design; the credit does not affect any other siting or design requirement. 15.220: Preparation of Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for every on-site system shall be prepared as follows: (4) Every plan for a system shall be of suitable scale (one inch = 40 feet or fewer for plot plans and one inch = 20 feet or fewer for details of system components) and shall include depiction of: (a) the legal boundaries of the facility to be served; (b) the holder and location of any easements appurtenant to or which could impact the system; (c) the location of all dwelling(s) and building(s) existing and proposed on the facility and identification of those to be served by the system; (d) the location of existing or proposed impervious areas, including driveways and parking areas; (e) location and dimensions of the system (including reserve area); (f) system design calculations, including design daily sewage flow, septic tank capacity (required and provided); soil absorption system capacity (required and provided); and whether system is designed for garbage grinder; (g) North arrow and existing and proposed contours; (h) location and log of deep observation hole tests including the date of test, existing grade elevations marked on each test, and the names of the representative of the Approving Authority and soil evaluator; (i) location and results of percolation tests including the date of test and the names of the representative of the Approving Authority and soil evaluator; 0) name and approval date of the Soil Evaluator of record; (k) location of every water supply, public and private, 1. within 400 feet of the proposed system location in the case of surface water supplies and gravel packed public water supply wells, 2. within 250 feet of the proposed system location in the case of tubular public water supply wells, and 3. within 150 feet of the proposed system location in the case of private water supply wells; (1) any surface waters of the Commonwealth, Zone As, rivers, bordering vegetated wetlands, salt marshes, inland or coastal banks, regulatory floodway, velocity zone, surface water supplies, tributaries to surface water supplies, certified vernal pools, private water supplies or suction lines, gravel packed or tubular public water supply wells, and subsurface drains located up to 100 feet beyond the setback distances in 310 CMR 15.211, any leaching catch basins and dry wells located up to 25 feet beyond the setback distances in 310 CMR 15.211; and the location of any nitrogen sensitive area identified in 310 CMR 15.245-214 within which any portion of the facility or the proposed system is located as well as any nitrogen sensitive area up to 100 feet beyond any property line of the facility. (m) location of water lines and other subsurface utilities on the facility; (n) observed and adjusted ground -water elevation in the vicinity of the system; (o) a complete profile of the system; (p) a note on the plan listing all variances to the provisions of 310 CMR 15.000 sought in conjunction with the plan; (q) the location and elevation of one benchmark within 50 to 75 feet of the system components which is not subject to dislocation or loss during construction on the facility; (r) when pressure distribution or dosing is proposed, complete design and specifications of the distribution system proposed including but not limited to dosing chamber capacity (required and provided), pump curves and specifications, number of dosing cycles and depth per cycle; (s) when a Recirculating Sand Filter or equivalent alternative technology is required or proposed, a complete plan and specifications for the system, including a hydraulic profile; (t) a locus plan to show the location of the facility including the nearest existing street; (u) the street number and lot number, if any, and the tax map number and lot number, if any, of the facility; and (v) the materials of construction and the specifications of the system. NOTE TO REVIEWERS: MassDEP is not proposing any changes to Sections 15.221 through 15.260. These provisions have been omitted. 15.262: Grp water S stems (9) Greywater systems for new construction or increases in flows to existing systems within nitrogen sensitive areas as defined in 310 CMR 15.21-5-214 must comply with the nitrogen loading limitations in accordance with 310 CMR 15.244215. NOTE. TO REVIEWERS: MassDEP is not proposing any changes to Sections 15.280 through 15.292. These provisions have been omitted. SUBPART D: INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEMS NOTE TO REVIEWERS: MassDEP is not proposing any changes to Sections 15.300 through 15.303. These provisions have been omitted. 15.304: Large Systems which Fail to Protect or which Threaten Public Health and Safe1y and the Environment (1) A system serving a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd is failing to protect public health, safety and the environment if any of the conditions identified in 310 CMR 15.303(1) are present, as documented by inspection by an approved System Inspector, or determined by the Local Approving Authority or the Department. Any such system shall be upgraded in accordance with the timeframes of 310 CMR 15.305(1) and the standards of 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405; provided, that the Department shall be the Approving Authority for all such upgrades. (2) A system serving a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd is a significant threat to public health, safety and the environment if any of the following conditions are present, as documented by inspection by an approved System Inspector, or as determined by the Local Approving Authority or the Department: (a) the system is located within 400 feet of a surface water supply or within 200 feet of a tributary to a surface water supply; or (b) the system is located within a nitrogen sensitive area as designated pursuant to 310 CMR 15.21-5214; (c) The owner or operator of any such system shall bring the system and the facility into compliance with the groundwater permit program requirements of 314 CMR 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program, including the obligation to obtain a groundwater discharge permit, within the time required by 310 CMR 15.305(2), unless the Department determines after consideration of the factors set forth in 310 CMR 15.304(3) that this requirement would be manifestly unjust, considering all the relevant facts and circumstances of the individual case, and the owner or operator has established that a level of environmental protection that is at least equivalent to that provided by 314 CMR 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program can be achieved without strict application of this requirement. (3) (a) In determining whether enforcement of the requirement set forth at 310 CMR 15.304(2) would be manifestly unjust, the Department shall include at a minimum the following considerations: 1. The owners of any such system for which permit applications were filed after May 9, 1994, or anywhere new construction occurred after March 31, 1995, shall be deemed to have had knowledge that a groundwater discharge permit would likely be required for such system pursuant to 310 CMR 15.3 04(2), and to have had a reasonable opportunity to make arrangements to come into compliance within the timeframes of 310 CMR 15.305(2); 2. The costs of preparing the demonstrations and implementing control measures required by 310 CMR 15.304 shall be compared to the costs of compliance with the requirement to obtain a groundwater discharge permit; and 3. Any other relevant factor. (b) In determining whether the applicant can provide the same degree of environmental protection as required by 310 CMR 15.3 04(2), the Department shall require at a minimum, the following: 1. inspection reports for the system as required by 310 CMR 15.301; 2. an assessment of the groundwater flow at the site, including but not limited to direction and rate of groundwater flow, assessment of saturated flow conditions and concentrations of nitrate and other pollutants associated with the system; 3. an assessment of water quality of relevant surface water supply, groundwater supply, or nitrogen sensitive areas; 4. a proposed design and engineering plans for upgrade of the system, prepared by a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer, that will, at a minimum, a. satisfy the requirements of 310 CMR 15.202 (recirculating sand filter or equivalent alternative technology); b. satisfy the nitrogen loading requirements of 310 CMR 15.21.4215; and c. ensure that the standards applicable to groundwater discharge permits pursuant to 314 CMR 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program are met at the property line and at the point the discharge from the facility reaches any surface water or water supply well. 5. a proposed maintenance, monitoring, and reporting plan that will ensure proper functioning of the upgraded system, and detection of any malfunction or failure to attain required discharge quality before discharges from the system leave the property; and b. if size and use of the facility is relevant to the demonstration that an equal level of environmental protection has been provided, appropriate use restrictions shall be granted and recorded in the chain of title for the property served by the system in the Registry of Deeds or Land Registration Office, as applicable, to ensure that such conditions are not changed. (c) An applicant for a determination pursuant to 310 CMR 15.304(3) shall file a request for such determination not less than two years prior to the date by which the owner would otherwise be required to obtain the groundwater discharge permit pursuant to 310 CMR 15.305(2). (d) In making any determination pursuant to 310 CMR 15.3 04(3), the Department shall impose such conditions as it determines appropriate to ensure protection of public health, safety, welfare and the environment. At a minimum, such conditions shall include upgrade of the system to the standards described in 310 CMR 15.304(3)(b)4., and a maintenance, monitoring and reporting plan as described in 310 CMR 15.304(3)(b)5. (4) Any system serving a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd shall be upgraded upon the order of the Department or the Local Approving Authority when a specific circumstance exists by which the system threatens public health, safety, welfare or the environment or causes or threatens to cause damage to property or creates a nuisance as determined by the Local Approving Authority or the Department. Where necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment, the Department or the Local Approving Authority may require the owner to install a recirculating sand filter or equivalent alternative technology in accordance with 310 CMR 15.202 or to obtain a groundwater discharge permit in accordance with 314 CMR 5.00. (5) A cesspool serving a facility with a design flow of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd is failing to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment. The owner of such Facility is required, pursuant to 310 CMR 27.04(4), to notify the Department's Underground Injection Control Program 30 days prior to upgrading the cesspool and to complete the upgrade of the cesspool by April 5, 2005. SUBPART E: PROCEDURES FOR SEEKING AND RECEIVING LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVALS AND VARIANCES FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SUBPARTS B AND C OF 310 CMR 15.000 15.402: Use of Local U ade A rovals or Variances (1) Local Upgrade Approvals may be granted by Local Approving Authorities without review by the Department for Aa -required or voluntary upgrade of existiny systems, includes failed or nonconforming systems., with design flows below 10,000 gpd and; for existing systems required to be upgraded to Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology pursuant to 310 CMR 15.215(2)(a) i , in accordance with the terms and provisions of 310 CMR 15.402 through 15.405. Upgrade Approvals for required or voluntary upgrade of systems with design flows of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd which are failing to protect or are a significant threat to public health, and safety, welfare and the environment as set forth in 310 CMR 15.304 shall be approved by the Department. (2) Proposals for new construction or for increase in flow to an existing system other than in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.293 must seek and obtain a variance from the Approving Authority in accordance with the terms and conditions of 310 CMR 15.410 through 15.417. 15.403: Local Uurade Aorrovals (1) The owner or operator may upgrade an existing system, including_ a failed or nonconforming system with design flows below 10,000 gpd (systems which trigger failure criteria set forth at 310 CMR 15.303) systems with design flows of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 gpd which fail to protect public health, safety, welfare and the environment (large systems set forth at 310 CMR 15.304(1))i; and existing systems required to be upgraded to Best Available Nitro yen Reducing Technology pursuant to 310 CMR 15.21512 a ; all pursuant to a local upgrade approval in accordance with the standards and requirements of 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405 without obtaining variances. Local upgrade approvals for any system serving a facility owned by an agency of the Commonwealth or the federal government or systems with design flows of 10,000 gpd or greater but less than 15,000 shall be granted by the Department applying the same standards. The application for a local upgrade approval shall be made using a form approved by the Department. Notification to abutters shall be provided pursuant to the process in 310 CMR 15.411(1)(b), as required by 310 CMR 15.405(2), where the application is for reduction in the setback from a property line or from a private water supply well. (2) Local Upgrade approvals shall not be granted for upgrade proposals which include the addition of new design flows to a cesspool or privy or for the addition of new design flows above the existing approved capacity of a system constructed in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 15.000 or the 1978 Code. (3) System upgrades which cannot be performed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405 require a variance from the provisions of 310 CMR 15.000, which shall be processed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.410 through 15.417. 15.404: Maximum Feasible Compliance - Approvals for Upgrades (1) Goal of full compliance. Wherever feasible, existing systems, includinga failed or nonconforming systems (other than systems threatening public health, safety, welfare or the environment as described in 310 CMR 15.304(2)) and existing systems required to be upgraded to Best Available Nitrosien Reducing Technology ursuant to 310 CMR 15.215(2)(a). shall be brought into full compliance through installation of one or more of the following: (a) an upgraded system which is in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.293; (b) an alternative system which has been approved for such use pursuant to 310 CMR 15.284 (remedial use), 15.285 (piloting), 15.286 (provisional approval), or 15.288 (certification for general use); (c) an RSF or equivalent alternative technology where the system is located in a Nitrogen Sensitive Area and has a design flow of 2000 gpd or greater in accordance with 310 CMR 15.202(1); (d) where proposed by the owner or operator, a shared system which has been approved for such use pursuant to 310 CMR 15.290 and 15.291; or (e) connection to a sewer system. 15.405: Contents of Local Unrade ApRroval (1) In granting local upgrade approvals pursuant to 310 CMR 15.404(23) where full compliance as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1) is not feasible, the Approving Authority shall consider the impact of the proposed system and shall vary to the least degree necessary the requirements of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.293 so as to allow for both the best feasible upgrade within the borders of the lot, and have the least effect on public health, safety, welfare and the environment. Under a local upgrade approval, the Approving Authority is allowed to diverge from the goal of full compliance only to the extent necessary to achieve a feasible upgrade and may allow divergence only from those provisions, and to the extent, as specified in 310 CMR 15.404(23) and 15.405(1). In determining whether full compliance is feasible, the Approving Authority should appropriately consider not only physical possibility as dictated by the conditions of the site, but also the economic feasibility of the upgrade costs. The Approving Authority should emphasize protection of water resources and treatment of the sanitary sewage. Absent conditions which would result in a different outcome based on best professional judgment, the options set forth below should be considered in the order in which they appear with 310 CMR 15.405(1)(a) being the first option to be considered and rejected or adopted and 310 CMR 15.405(1)(k) being the last option to be considered and rejected or adopted: (a) Reduction of system location setbacks otherwise established in 310 CMR 15.211 for property lines provided that the system is within the property lines, a survey of the property line is required if a component is to be placed within five feet of the property line, and no such reduction shall result in the soil absorption system being located less than ten feet from a soil absorption system on an abutting property; (b) Reductions of system location setbacks from cellar wall, crawl space, swimming pool, or slab foundations; an increase in the maximum allowable depth of system components required by 310 CMR 15.221(7), from 36 inches to 72 inches below fmish grade, provided that adequate venting and adequate access are provided and H-20 loading is provided for all system components; a decrease in the liquid depth of the septic tank required by 310 CMR 15.223(2) from four feet to three feet; (c) Up to a 25% reduction in the required subsurface disposal area design requirements; (d) Where upgrade is required pursuant to 310 CMR 15.303(1) because it is within Zone I of public well or within 100 feet of private well, relocation of the well. Any relocation of a public well shall be performed pursuant to 310 CMR 22.00: Drinking Water (water supply source approval); (e) Reduction of system location setbacks from bordering vegetated wetlands; (f) Reduction of system location setbacks from surface waters, salt marshes, inland and coastal banks, certified vernal pools in accordance with 310 CMR 15.211(1)[2], leaching catch basins, dry wells, or surface or subsurface drains other than those which discharge to surface water supplies or tributaries thereto; (g) Reduction of system location setbacks from water supply lines, private water supply wells (but not within 50 feet of the well), tributaries to surface water supplies, surface water supplies, but not within 100 feet of the surface water supply or tributary thereto or open, surface or subsurface drains which discharge to surface water supplies or tributaries thereto; (h) the Approving Authority may reduce the required four foot separation (in soils with a recorded percolation rate of more than two minutes per inch) or the required five foot separation (in soils with a recorded percolation rate of two minutes or less per inch) between the bottom of the soil absorption system and the high groundwater elevation only if all of the following conditions are met: 1. An approved Soil Evaluator who is a member or agent of the local Approving Authority determines the high groundwater elevation; 2. A minimum three foot separation (in soils with a recorded percolation rate of more than two minutes per inch) or a minimum four foot separation (in soils with a recorded percolation rate of two minutes or less per inch) between the bottom of the soil absorption system and the high groundwater elevation is maintained; 3. The system is a failed or non -conforming system serving an existing building with a design flow of less than 2,000 gpd; 4. No increase in design flow is allowed; 5. No reduction in required soil absorption system size or setbacks from public or private wells, bordering vegetated wetlands, surface waters, salt marshes, coastal banks, certified vernal pools, water supply lines, surface water supplies or tributaries to surface water supplies, or drains which discharge to surface water supplies or their tributaries, is allowed. (i) A sieve analysis may be performed in accordance with Department guidance if a percolation test in accordance with 310 CMR 15.104 and 15.105 can not be performed as determined by the Approving Authority; 0) Reduction of the requirement of a 12 inch separation between the inlet and outlet tees and high groundwater, provided that all boots or pipe joints are sealed with hydraulic cement or installed with watertight sleeves and the tank is proven watertight. Expandable foam spray is not an acceptable alternative for sealing pipe joints; or (k) At least one deep hole has been performed in the proposed disposal area and it has been determined by the Approving Authority that the deep hole adequately characterizes the soils for the purpose of designing the soil absorption system. (2) No application for a local upgrade approval in which the setback from property lines or a private water supply well is reduced shall be complete until the applicant has notified all abutters whose property or well is affected by certified mail at his/her own expense at least ten days before the Board of Health meeting at which the upgrade approval will be on the agenda. The notification shall reference the standards set forth in 310 CMR 15.402 through 15.405 and indicate the date, time and place where the upgrade approval will be discussed. (3) If the system cannot be upgraded in accordance with 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405(1) the owner shall: (a) obtain a groundwater discharge permit pursuant to 314 CMR 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program; (b) apply to the Approving Authority to use a tight tank in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 15.260; (c) apply for a variance pursuant to 310 CMR 15.410 through 15.415; or (d) abandon the system in compliance with 310 CMR 15.354. (4) Nothing in 310 CMR 15.405 shall authorize violation of M.G.L. c. 131, § 40 and 310 CMR 10.00: Wetlands Protection, or any other applicable provision of law. NOTE TO REVIEWERS: MassDEP is not proposing any changes to Subpart F or Appendix 1. These provisions have been omitted. 6-22-23 Includes redline changes since draft and public comment period to final 314 CMR 21.00: Massachusetts Watershed Permit Regulations Section 21.01: General Provisions 21.02: Definitions 21.03: Application for a Watershed Permit 21.04: Application Review Process 21.05: Elements of a Watershed Permit 21.06: Modification, Revocation and Renewal of a Watershed Permit 21.07: Continuation of an Expiring Watershed Permit 21.08: Signatories to Permit Applications and Reports 21.09: Enforcement, Violations and Right of Entry 21.10: General Conditions 21.11: Appeals 21.12: De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption 21.01: General Provisions (1) Purpose. The purpose of these regulations is to establish a watershed permitting strategy and process to restore and protect water quality in nutrient impacted watersheds. The development and implementation of a Watershed Management Plan that will eliminate these water quality impacts are essential to this purpose. A Watershed Permit establishes performance standards, authorized activities, and the timeframes that will be utilized under an adaptive management framework to achieve nutrient load reductions that are necessary to meet the specific water quality and habitat quality restoration goals that have been identified in a watershed analysis as being necessary to meet the designated uses of the waterbody established by the Department under 314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, for the nutrients identified in the watershed analysis. (2) Authority. The Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53, charges the Department with the duty and responsibility to protect the public health and enhance the quality and value of the water resources of the Commonwealth. The Massachusetts Watershed Permit Regulations are promulgated pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21, § 27 and Section 2A of Chapter 259 of the Acts of 2014. Consistent with this authority, any Watershed Permit that the Department issued prior to the effective date of these regulations shall remain valid and binding on the permittees. 21.02: Definitions For the purposes of 314 CMR 21.00, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: 208 Plan — An Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan certified by the Governor or his or her designee and approved by EPA pursuant to § 208 of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288. Alternative Control Approach or Technology — A technology or approach that is not a Conventional Control Approach or Technology but can be effectively used to remove pollutants from a waterbody or prevent or reduce the introduction of pollutants into a waterbody. Examples include but are not limited to permeable reactive barriers, enhanced natural attenuation, restored or constructed wetlands, fertilizer reduction, and pollutant credits or trading. Alternative Restoration Plan — A near-term plan or description of actions with a schedule and milestones under the federal Clean Water Act Section 303(d), 33 U.S.C. § 1313(d), that is expected to be more immediately beneficial or practicable in achieving water quality standards in the near term than pursuing development of Total Maximum Daily Load(s). An Alternative Restoration Plan was previously identified as an Alternative Total Maximum Daily Load. Baseline Nitrogen Load — A Local Government Unit's Vro ortion of the Controllable Attenuated Nitrogen Load that existed during the evaluation period for, and as reported in, the applicable TMDL, Alternative Restoration Plan, MEP Report, or Scientific Evaluation. It is sometimes referred to as the "present-day" load that existed during the evaluation period. Best Management Practices or BMPs — Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the Commonwealth. BMPs include, but are not limited to, treatment requirements; operating procedures; and structures, devices, or practices to control plant site runoff, spillage, leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. Clean Water Act or CWA — The Federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. Comprehensive Wastewater Mann ement Plan or CWMP - a plan which develops and evaluates alternatives that can be implemented to meet a community's wastewater infrastructure and management needs and which is consistent with the Department's Guide to Comprehensive Wastewater Management Planning. Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan or CWRMP — A plan developed in accordance with the Department's Guide to Water Resource Management Planning that identifies a community's needs and problem areas in one sector of its water resource structure, evaluates alternative means of addressing those needs and problem areas, selects the most cost- effective and environmentally appropriate remedy, and proposes an implementation plan and schedule. CWRMPs include (i) plans that evaluate a community's wastewater infrastructure and management needs (e.g., CWMP), (ii) plans that focus on the community's water supply infrastructure and management issues, and (iii) plans that focus on the community's stormwater management needs. Controllable Attenuated Nitrogen Load - The total nitrogen load from all controllable loads within the watershed that reaches the embavment or estuan . Conventional Control Approach or Technology -- a combination of physical, chemical, and biological processes that provide primary, secondary, or tertiary treatment and have been proven to be consistently effective for treating wastewater or sewage to remove suspended solids, dissolved solids, biological decomposition of organic matter, pathogens, and nutrients from wastewater. Examples of Conventional Control Technology include but are not limited to sewage treatment plants and enhanced nutrient removal alternative septic systems that the Department accepts as conventional. Core Sewer Area — The area identified in a CWMP, CWRMP, or TWMP requiring wastewater collection using Conventional Control Technology as the optimal control technology because of factors such as the extent of the local wastewater impact, proximity to impacted resources, and existing density and anticipated growth. De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption —An exemption from the permitting requirements of 314 CMR 21.00 issued by the Department pursuant to 314 CMR 21.12. Department — The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. District — Any county, regional or local district, commission, board or other political subdivision or instrumentality of the Commonwealth, howsoever named, which is authorized to provide itself or through an officer, board, department or division thereof local water pollution abatement, sewer or stormwater services, or public water supply services, whether established under general law or special act. Environmental Justice (EJ) Population (a) A Neighborhood that meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. the annual median household income is not more than 65% of the statewide annual median household income; 2. minorities comprise 40% or more of the population; 3. 25% or more of households lack English language proficiency; 4. minorities comprise 25% or more of the population and the annual median household income of the municipality in which the neighborhood is located does not exceed 150% of the statewide annual median household income; or (b) a geographic portion of a Neighborhood designated by the Secretary as an Environmental Justice Population pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30, § 62; provided, however, that a Neighborhood or a geographic portion of a Neighborhood that the Secretary has determined shall not be designated an Environmental Justice Population pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30, § 62 shall not be considered an Environmental Justice Population under 314 CMR 21.00. EPA — The United States Environmental Protection Agency. Local Government Unit — Any town, city, district, county, commission, agency, authority, board or other instrumentality of the commonwealth or of any of its political subdivisions, including any Regional Local Governmental Unit. Massachusetts EstuaEy Project Re .ort or MEP Report — A technical report produced by the Massachusetts Estuaries Project that has been accepted by the Department and was created to: determine current nitrogen loads to estuaries; evaluate reductions that would be necessary to support healthy ecosystems based on a linked model to evaluate nitrogen inputs to estuaries; and provide technical guidance to support appropriate wastewater, watershed, and embayment management techniques to reduce nitrogen loading. Necessary Nitroven Load Reductions — The proportion of the total Controllable Attenuated Nitrogen Load that must be reduced in order to restore the waterbody to applicable water duality_ and habitat quality restoration goals that have been identified in a TMDL. Alternative Restoration Plan. MEP Report, or Scientific Evaluation as being necessar • to meet the designated uses of the waterbody established by the Department under 314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts Sui ace Water Duality Standards. Person — Any agency or political subdivision of the Commonwealth, the Federal government, any public or private corporation or authority, individual, partnership or association, or other entity, including any officer of a public or private agency or organization. Pollutant — Any element or property of sewage, agricultural, industrial or commercial waste, runoff, leachate, heated effluent, or other matter, in whatever form and whether originating at a point or major non -point source, which is or may be discharged, drained or otherwise introduced into any sewerage system, treatment works or waters of the Commonwealth. Quality Assurance Program Plan or QAPP — A planning document for a specific monitoring project or program that describes the quality -control elements to be implemented to help ensure that the data collected will be of known and documented quality to meet the project or program needs. Implementation of an approved QAPP is generally required for any monitoring data used by the Department. Regional Local Government Unit — Any Local Government Unit which is responsible for the ownership or operation of a Regional System. Regional System — An entity or legal arrangement that is designed to provide public water supply or wastewater services through facilities, sources, or distribution networks and has the authority to set rates and charges for the consumers of such services, including but not limited to: a Local Government Unit or District serving two or more municipalities, a private water system serving two or more municipalities, or a county in which all municipalities of the county have agreed to provide shared public water or wastewater services and set rates and charges for such services. Scientific Evaluation — A watershed assessment that is accepted by the Department because it is scientifically rigorous and based upon information, data, modeling, and analyses that could be used to: (1) delineate the watershed; (2) develop and implement an EPA -approved TMDL; and (3) develop and implement wastewater and nutrient management plans to satisfy the TMDL; and which produces, at a minimum, the following: (1) quantitative and qualitative assessments of the nutrient related health of the waterbodies being assessed; (2) identification of all controllable and uncontrollable nutrient sources and their respective contributions to the waterbodies for the present day and the next 20 years, including any projected buildout; (3) nutrient threshold concentrations that must be achieved to comply with 314 CMR 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards to support the ecosystem and restore and maintain indicator habitats, such as eel grass and benthic species, associated with nutrient impacts; (4) analyses of watershed nutrient loading reductions that will be necessary to achieve at least the minimum nutrient threshold concentrations in the waterbody and restore and maintain the indicator habitats; and (5) site-specific, calibrated, watershed-waterbody model(s) that can be used to simulate the efficacy of strategies towards restoration and maintenance of the waterbodies. (A TMDL is not required to complete the Scientific Evaluation.) Surface Waters — All waters other than ground waters within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth, including, without limitation, rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, springs, impoundments, estuaries, wetlands and coastal waters. Surface Water Quality Standards — The Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards set forth in 314 CMR 4.00. Targeted Watershed Management Plan or TWMP — A plan that is consistent with a 208 Plan, if a 208 Plan exists, as determined by the designated areawide planning agency under § 208 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1288, and that contains all elements of a CWMP or a CWRMP developed to address the waterbody impairments or impacts identified in a TMDL, Alternative Restoration Plan, MEP Report, or Scientific Evaluation, or to implement a TMDL or Alternative Restoration Plan, in a watershed or sub -watershed. Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL — The sum of a receiving water's individual waste load allocations and load allocations and natural background, which, together with a margin of safety that takes into account any lack of knowledge concerning the relationship between effluent limitations and water quality, represents the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards in all seasons. Updated Nitrogen Load — The sum of the Baseline Nitrogen Load and any changes in that load that occur between completion of the aLiplicable TMDL. Alternative Restoration Plan. MEP Reportor Scientific Evaluation and the filing of an application for either a Watershed Permit or a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption. Watershed — The boundary of the area described by either surface hydrology, subsurface hydrology, or both, delineating a drainage divide to a specific body of water. Watershed Management Plan or WMP — A plan; inekiding a GWMP, GWRN4P, of TW.•.. , that:(') has beenappFeved by the go ---- _ I , 1. fthe Loeal Goye a„t r +iit(s) or eaek respeetive wateFshea „o,.mit applie^n*; _(2Lq) is consistent with a 208 Plan, if such plan exists, as determined by the designated areawide planning agency under § 208 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1288; (3jb) includes or is supplemented with the information and documentation specified in 314 CMR 21.03(2), unless the Department determines otherwise; (4Lcc) is based on one or more CWMPs, CWRMPs, or TWMPs, which may serve as the WMP if all requirements of this definition are met; and (54�) provides a schedule and description of actions to achieve Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions. to estore the water -body to ^ ,..;,.able c,,, -face Watef Qualivy Standards and other _ _._ ,Ll Cll<Vl U{Al1LV YY1th u fty applie ble Tt 4DL,, Altematiye * ti Dl TARP Report, S ti fi D l •• Unless lTT[�O YT^RGTp1TTTC[ll -� ZL-[�y otherwise determined by the Department. the WMP may address pollutants other than nitro gen. Watershed Permit — A permit issued by the Department pursuant to 314 CMR 21.00 for one or more watersheds with a term of no longer than twen« L ears, including the Pleasant Bay Watershed Permit (Permit No. 001-0) that was issued August 3, 2018, by the Department prior to the promulgation of 314 CMR 21.00. 21.03: Application for a Watershed Permit (1) Any Local Government Unit seeking a Watershed Permit may file an application with the Department. A_ Watershed Permit application or a Notice of Intent for a Watershed Permit must be filed pursuant to 310 CMR 15.215(2) to sus end an Title 5 New Construction rem, uirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2)(b) or to prevent any a licable Title 5 system upgrade requirements under 310 CMR 15.215)1 a) from going into effect. Multiple Local Government Units that share a watershed or sub -watershed may apply jointly for a Watershed Permit, provided they have entered into a mutually enforceable agreement among the parties that confirms each applicant's percentage share of the NecessaTA Nitre , Load Reductions aggregate pollutant load r-emoval ro sib4 ty and provides a framework to coordinate resource management decision-making and arrangements relating to the receipt and expenditure of funds for implementation. Unless otherwise stated in the mutually enforceable agreement among the .parties each Local Government Unit is only responsible for the proportion of the Controllable Attenuated Nitrogen Load that originates from within its political boundaries. Authority to enforce the Watershed Permit is reserved to the Doartment. (2) Contents of an Application. An application for a Watershed Permit shall contain sufficient information for the Department to evaluate whether the application meets the applicable review criteria. At ^ - inimumUnless otherwise determined by the Department, the application shall include: (a) a complete application using a form provided by the Department for such purposes; (b) a Watershed Management Plan, signed and stamped by a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer, for the watershed or sub -watershed that is the subject of the application and includes: 1. maps depicting the watershed boundary, including each parcel of land within the area proposed for coverage, and a narrative describing the area proposed to be covered under a Watershed Permit; 2. a description of the current and historic water quality conditions, including short-term (daily/seasonal) and long-term (annual) variability; 3. any earlier planning approaches taken prior to filing the application, including any related findings and recommendations; 4. the types, locations, and timing of any on-going and proposed TMDL, Alternative Restoration Plan, MEP Report, or Scientific Evaluation implementation activities within the watershed or sub -watershed proposed for coverage, including a table identifying: a_the Updated nNitrogen ILoad that the area proposed for coverage under the Wwatershed Ppermit contributed to the Surface Waters of the watershed for- the past to <.ears�specifying and accounting for implementation of all nitrogen reduction measures: gib. and -projected loads for the following twenty years (projections must include scenarios for proposed nitrogen -load reducing activities as well as a "business al" ^ status quo seenane without those aetiv4ies; an MEP Report or other Scientific Evaluation buildout scenario may suffice): b c.the percentage e of NecessaEy Nitrogen Load Reductions to be attained lead reduetions neeessar-yduring the term of the permit to satisfy the ats or eliminate the n t,-ege ; „tom f any ,.1ieable TN4D s Alternative tip a Rest r- .�.-. Plan, i t:MEP Reports, of Seientifie Evaluations- -and a concise description of the means of achieving those specified reductions during the term e the peffflit; c-.d.the Conventional Control Technologies and Alternative Control Approaches or Technologies selected for pollutant load reductions and identification of each permittee that will be responsible for implementing each activity; d-e.the area each selected Conventional Control Technology and Alternative Control Approach or Technology would service; e f. the aDoortionment of Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions eeneentra4ien(s) .,t the s n4inel station(s) (if .,pplieabk)for each of the selected Conventional Control Technologies and Alternative Control Approaches or Technologies; fl.ethe implementation schedule for each Alternative Control Approach or Technology proposed, including a timeframe for demonstration, testing, and acceptance or abandonment of such approaches or technologies; 5. maps depicting the watershed boundary, including each parcel of land within the area proposed for coverage, and a narrative describing the Core Sewer Area, if applicable, and the service areas prioritized for wastewater collection and treatment after accounting for implementation of the selected Alternative Control Approaches and Technologies; 6. documentation of what each permittee proposes to do to reduce its pollutant load in the watershed or sub -watershed and when those reductions would occur; 7. if Alternative Control Approaches and Technologies are proposed, a contingency plan for a back-up Conventional Control Technology in the event that the Alternative Control Approaches and Technologies selected do not function as predicted; 8. a description of each of the proposed pollutant reduction actions to reduce current and projected loads identified above:neeessaFy e awehieyg eemp1; „tl, C, rf: e Water- Quality Stanch ds stated ; an "sotuwaa ui any appeal,le TN4DL, A lte,-.,atiye Restoration Plan N49P Rope+ -t ,r Se ent;fie Evaluation; Cl the proposed appr-oaeh to l; ;t „t.-olor- pr -event projected 20 . 1lutant loads teensure that they will stay below the threshold levels neeessafy to satisfy a .linable Alater-s e.l Management Dla. T -MI ., Alt ,-,-.atiye RestorationPlan MEP De. oi4 ,- Se e„ti Evaluation,, r, 4-0-9. cost estimates for the infrastructure and programs associated with the proposed actions, if available; 4-10. an implementation schedule, not to exceed 20 years, currently envisioned by the applicant(s), including a designated set of activities that will occur in each 5 -year period and a methodology for analyzing the results of those activities and making necessary adjustments for each subsequent 5 -year period of the permit to the meet required load reductions; 17 a ,7 do of ho upgradient management aetiyit;es e potentially f7 a ,1,,w ngr-adieat water- quality n ndit;` ns thr-o ,.Tl- ou! the water -shed e „b, watefs e,1• 4-,11. a watershed or sub -watershed scale monitoring plan that defines the goals of the monitoring plan, the selected water quality parameters, the method(s) of monitoring to be employed, the sampling frequency, locations, timing and duration, and a Quality Assurance Program Plan; and a rvevalua4ien 4-4.12. the information sources relied upon to develop the proposed Watershed Management Plan; and 413. if the application seeks a Watershed Permit based on a Watershed Management Plan that will not a^b„_ _ _ - plete ; pleme„tatien „f attain Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions beet the water quality and habitat quality resteration goals identified i the Seientifi^ Evaluation during the h&-of4he-permit term,--ovide documentation showing the financial costs and environmental impact of_: (ai) complete compliance with those goals and (bii) a proposed alternative that makes reasonable progress toward achievement of the goals in accordance with 314 CMR 21.04(1)(a); and (c) if there is more than one applicant, an inter -municipal agreement or other legally binding and appropriate agreement among the applicants that confirms each permittee's percentage share of the aggregate pollutant reduction responsibility and provides a framework to administer implementation of the Watershed Management Plan, including arrangements for the receipt and expenditure of funds. 21.04: Application Review Process (1) Permit Review Standard. The Department shall not issue a Watershed Permit if the proposed Watershed Management Plan does not provide for either (i) achievement of the Necessary Nitrogen pe4u+an4-1Load rReductions neeessaFy to meet the water "ality and habitat qual ii goals identified in the applicable ToDT, Alto,-.,at;t.a Restefati .n Dl.,., MEP D^.,eft ,. Seienti fie >~valuatio?during the limfe-ef4he-permit term or (ii) reasonable progress in achievement of those N_necessary ollu4a }tNitrogen Y oad rReductions within the permit term of the permit. The Department will make a finding of reasonable progress if it determines that: (a) the Applicant's proposed alternative provided under 314 CMR 21.03(2)(b)13-5. is reasonable considering the financial costs and environmental impacts of the complete and proposed alternative compliance scenarios provided under 314 CMR 21.03(2)(b)13-5; (b) the Applicant cannot reasonably achieve eomplete eomph leethe Necessarv_ Nitrogen Load Reductio_ within the 1'�he-permit term; and (c) either: (1J) at least 75% of the N_necessary pallut+ntNitrogen Lload Rreduction levels to the S2 ater- adios will be achieved within 20 years, or (Q) an alternative schedule is appropriate based on watershed -specific issues.-(e.g., number or complexity of watersheds. proportion of community's land area in watershed. total nitrogen load to be reduced. logistical and financial planning for wastewater infrastructure, complexity of achieving nitrogen reduction targets). The alternative schedule must. at a minimum, include planning and a schedule to achieve all Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions. (2) Tentative Determination and Preparation of Draft Permits (a) After receiving a complete application, the Department will issue for public comment a draft permit or a tentative determination to deny a permit. (b) If the Department issues a draft permit, the draft permit shall contain such terms and conditions as the Department deems necessary to ensure that the permitted discharges, activities and facilities will comply with all applicable requirements of 314 CMR 21.00. (c) The Department may determine to withdraw a draft permit before issuing a final permit. The Department may provide a written statement to the applicant and any other person who requests it stating why the Department has withdrawn the draft permit and whether the Department intends to issue a revised draft permit for public comment in the future. (d) Public Notice. The applicant shall provide public notice of the draft Watershed Permit or tentative determination to deny a permit at the applicant's expense in accordance with the requirements of 314 CMR 21.04(2)(d) l .-6. Public notice shall afford a period of at least 60 days after the date of publication during which the public may comment or request a public hearing. The Department may elect to extend the public comment period. If the Department provides such an extension, the applicant shall provide notice thereof in the same manner as the original notice. The applicant shall publish public notice of the Watershed Permit proceeding in the Environmental Monitor and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution both online and in hardcopy, if hardcopy exists, within the area that will be affected by the Watershed Permit. The applicant will also request that notice be published in the local town or city hall and on the website of the community or communities that may be affected. The Department will post the notice on the Department's webpage. The applicant shall send a copy of the public notice to the Department at least two business days before the date of publication. 2. In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where the preceding manner for publishing public notice does not specifically serve the Environmental Justice Population(s), the applicant shall provide public notice to at least one additional news organization that primarily serves the Environmental Justice Population(s) within the area that may be affected by the Watershed Permit. The public notice shall be translated into other languages that are prevalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiency. 3.Within seven days after the date of publication, the applicant shall submit to the Department a copy of the public notice as published in the Environmental Monitor and the name and address of the newspaper(s) in which it was published and the date the notice appeared in the newspaper(s). 4. The Department will post the notice on the Department's webpage and shall send a copy of a public notice to any person who has submitted a written request for notice of the proceeding. 5. The date of publication in the Environmental Monitor shall constitute the date of publication of public notice for purposes of 314 CMR 21.00. 6.The public notice shall contain the following minimum information and any additional information the Department deems appropriate: a. the name and address of the applicant; b. identification of the watershed or sub -watershed to be addressed by the Watershed Permit; c. the statutory and regulatory authority under which the final determination will be made; d. the name, telephone number, and e-mail address of the person from whom a copy of the draft Watershed Permit or tentative determination may be obtained; and e. the time within which the public may comment or request a public hearing. (3) Public Hearings. If the applicant requests a public hearing, or if the Department determines a public hearing to be in the public interest, then the Department shall schedule and conduct such hearing either remotely or in a community within the area that may be affected by the Watershed Permit. The applicant shall provide public notice of the public hearing in accordance with 314 CMR 21.04(2)(d)1.-6. Aat least 30 days prior to the hearing. Where a public hearing is held, the public comment period shall be extended to the conclusion of the public hearing or such later date as may be established by the Department. [4). Issuance or Denial of Permit. After the conclusion of the public comment period, the Department may issue or deny a final Watershed Permit. The Department's determination shall be effective upon the date of issuance or denial of the permit, unless an appeal is filed during the 21 -day period following issuance or denial, pursuant to 314 CMR 21.11 and 310 CMR 1.01: Adjudicatory Proceeding Rules for the Department of Environmental Protection. If the filinu of the Watershed Permit application or a Notice of Intent for such application operated to suspend the application of any a licable Title 5 upgrade or New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215{2), then within twenty-eiLht days of a permit denial becomin effective, the De )artment will publish notice of the denial and that the mandatory Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements are invoked in accordance with the timeframes established in 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) as if a Watershed Permit had been terminated or revoked effective on the date the Department_ publishes the notice of denial. The Department shall publish the notice: in the forthcoming Environmental Monitor: on the Department's website; in the town hall where similar notices arepublished: and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution within the area that may be affected by the Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements. In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where thepreceding method for publishing public notice does not specifically_ serve the Environmental Justice Population(s), the Department must also provide the preceding notice to at least one additional news organization that rimaril + serves the Environmental Justice Population(s) within the area that may be affected by the designation. The public notice shall be translated into other languages that are prevalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiency. 21.05: Re uired Elements of a Watershed Permit (1) A roved Watershed Mana ement Plan and Implementation Schedule. A Watershed Permit shall establish a schedule for the permittee's implementation of the pollutant reduction actions identified in the Watershed Management Plan approved by the Department as being neeessary to meet the ate ality d habitat itat q alit restoration Evaluation. The proposed activities, schedule, and facilities set forth in the applicant's Watershed Management Plan, with Department -approved modifications, shall be enforceable requirements of, and incorporated within, the Watershed Permit. The Department may modify the Watershed Management Plan or the approved implementation schedule in accordance with the terms and conditions of 314 CMR 21.00 and the Watershed Permit. (2) Monitoring and Reporting. The permittee shall monitor water quality in accordance with the monitoring requirements contained in the Watershed Permit and shall report the results annually to the Department. or as otherwise required by the Department4}r44+e Annual Re efts fequifedby the [>; ate (shed Peff it (3) Adaptive Management Framework. (a) The Watershed Permit shall establish an adaptive management framework in which the permittee will make future decisions, subject to the approval of the Department, as part of an ongoing science -based process that is consistent with: (i) any applicable TMDL, Alternative Restoration Plan, MEP Report, or Scientific Evaluation and (ii) the Permittee's progress in attaining Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions r-edeeing leads to meet the , .a;e f quality and habitat quality restoration wls identified in the Water -shed Maa-nt Dl.,__ during the permit termli f of the pemiA. (b) The permittee shall implement the framework, as set forth in the approved Watershed Management Plan, to evaluate the results of the permittee's water quality management program and adjust and modify the strategies and practices, as needed, to address conditions that are causing the water quality impairments. (c) The permittee shall provide a contingency plan in its approved Watershed Management Plan that relies on Conventional Control Technologies to achieve Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions the tar -get thr-eshela pollutant eeneentr-ations identified in the appf- --d Watershed Management Plan. The contingency plan shall be updated whenever the approved Watershed Management Plan or implementation schedule is modified. (d) Subject to Department approval, a permittee may assume pollutant reduction credit for Alternative Control Approaches and Technologies only if the permittee or other responsible parry implements and maintains such approaches and/or technologies and the related reductions in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Watershed Permit. (4) Identification of Other Permits Inc=orated by Reference. The Department shall identify any other permits previously issued by the Department that comprise a component of the implementation activities described in the approved Watershed Management Plan. Any such permits shall be incorporated into the Watershed Permit by reference. (5) Conditions. (a) The Watershed Permit shall include the General Conditions described at 314 CMR 21.10. (b) The Watershed Permit may contain other conditions deemed necessary or appropriate by the Department to ,,Move the goals of the approved Water -shed 4anagement Pla attain and maintain Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductionsor- to meet the Sur-faee Water- Quality Standards appheable to the watef bodies and 21.06: Modification, Revocation, Termination, and Renewal of a Watershed Permit (1) The Department may propose and determine to modify or revoke any Watershed Permit, in whole or in part, for cause including, but not limited to, violation of the permit, obtaining the permit by misrepresentation, or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts or any change in or discovery of conditions relevant to the permit. Revocation of a permittee's coverage shall operate as a termination of the Watershed Permit with respect to that permittee and the terms of 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) requiring individual Title 5 system upgrades and Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology for New Construction shall apply tabecome effective in the watershed area for each permittee to whom the termination is applicable. Termination of a permit because (a) its terns expires without attainment of the Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions and (b) it has not been continued pursuant to 314 CMR 21.07 or renewed pursuant (o 314 (NR 21.06 5 will cause the requirements of 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) fors stem upgrades and New Construction to become effective in the watershed area to which the termination applies (2) If the Watershed Permit operated to suspend the effectiveness of any aRplicable Title 5 u rade or New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2). then within twenty-eight days of the Department issuing a notice of termination for cause and an other termination that operates to invoke the mandatory. Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements in 310 CMR 15.215L2}(d), the Department will publish notice of the termination and that the mandatory Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements in 310 CMR 15.215L2 (d) are invoked, effective on the date the Department issues the notice of termination to the Local Government Unit. The Department shall publish notice of the termination and invocation of the Title 5 up -grade and New Construction requirements: in the forthcoming Environmental Monitor: on the Department's website: in the town hall where similar notices are published: and in a local or regional news a er with the largest readership distribution within the area that may be affected by the requirements. In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where the preceding method for publishing public notice does not specifically, serve the Environmental Justice Population(s). the Department must also provide the preceding notice to at least one additional news organization that primarily serves the Environmental Justice Population(s) within the area that may be affected by the designation. The public notice shall be translated into other languages that are prevalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiency - (3) The Department may modify the permit at the request of the permittee upon a showing, satisfactory to the Department, that the requested modification is appropriate in view of circumstances for which the permittee is not at fault. (4) The Department shall process a significant modification or revocation of the Watershed Permit in the same manner as an application for a Watershed Permit under 314 CMR 21.04, but the public comment period for significant modifications will be limited to 30 days. Unless otherwise determined bG- the Department_ £significant permit modifications are those that would materially change: Uthe permit's required pollutant load reductions and require an extension in the permit schedule or a permit renewal to achieve the revised reductions; (h1the method or technology to achieve Necessary. Nitrogen Load Reductions pollutant lead feduetions in a water -body or- wateFwey if such method or technology was not part of the approved Watershed Management Plan; orJc.) the timeframe to achieve said reductions. Unless otherwise determined by the Department, other modifications are minor modifications and not subject to the requirements of 314 CMR 21.04. The Department may revise a Watershed Permit to accommodate minor modifications. Within 14 da-ys of the Depai4ment making thes- miner- diff .. bens the „ fflii toe shall -publish notiee ef the medifieations in the Envifonmental Monitor- and on the pefmittee's website-. Only the significant permit modifications shall be subject to a request for an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to 314 CMR 21.11. Significant pennit modifications shall not be implemented until the Department issues the revised Watershed Permit that includes those modifications. (5) Renewal of a Watershed Permit shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of 314 CMR 21.03 through 21.05, except as provided in 314 CMR 21.06(45)(c). (a) The Department may renew a Watershed Permittee_ (b) To seek renewal, the permittee must file an application for renewal at least six months before the expiration date of the existing Watershed Permit. (c) The Department shall not renew a Watershed Permit if the proposed Watershed Management Plan provided with the renewal application does not provide for attainment of the Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions aeh e,•o. ent of the Sur -face Water- Quality Standar-ds identified in the Water -shed Management the ea it (d) If the Department withdraws a draft permit renewal, in accordance with 314 CMR 21.04(2)(c), the existing permit will remain in effect in accordance with 314 CMR 21.07. (6) The Department may modify, revoke, reissue, or terminate a Watershed Permit it issued prior to the effective date of these regulations, consistent with the terms of these regulations, the previously issued permit, and the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53. 21.07: Continuation of an Exi2iring Watershed Permit (1) In accordance with M.G.L. c. 30A, § 13, a Watershed Permit shall not expire until the Department has issued a decision denying or approving the permittee's renewal application if: (a) the permittee submitted a complete renewal application at least six months prior to the date of expiration of the Watershed Permit; and (b) the Department, through no fault of the permittee, does not issue or deny a renewed permit on or before the expiration date of the previous permit. (2) Effect. Watershed Permits continued under this section remain fully effective and enforceable until the Department issues a decision denying or approving the permittee's renewal application. 21.08: Sienatories to Permit Applications and Reports (1) Applications. All permit applications shall be signed by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official with authority to legally bind the applicant. (2) Reports. All reports required by a Watershed Permit and other information requested by the Department shall be signed by a person described in 314 CMR 21.038(31){x}, or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in 314 CMR 21.08(1); b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, superintendent, or position of equivalent responsibility; and c. The written authorization is submitted to the Department. (3) Certification. Any person signing a document under 314 CMR 21.08 shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." 21.09: Enforcement, Violations, and Right of Entry (1) The Department may take enforcement action pursuant to applicable law to enforce the provisions of 314 CMR 21.00 and any Watershed Permit issued thereunder. Such action may include, without limitation, the following: (a) Requiring a permittee to provide information, within a timeframe specified by the Department, to enable the Department to determine whether such permittee is subject to, in violation of, or has violated 314 CMR 21.00 or any Watershed Permit issued thereunder; (b) Revoking the Watershed Permit in accordance with 314 CMR 21.06; (c) Assessing civil administrative penalties pursuant to M.G.L. c. 21A, § 16, and M.G.L. c. 21, § 42; and (d) Taking any other actions authorized by these regulations or any other authority by which the Department may act. (2) Without limitation, it shall be a violation of 314 CMR 21.00 to: (a) Make any false, inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement in any submission required by 314 CMR 21.00 or a Watershed Permit; (b) Make any false, inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement in any record, report, plan, file, log, register, or other document which the permittee is required to keep under 314 CMR 21.00 or a Watershed Permit; (c) Fail to meet deadlines established by, or otherwise fail to comply with an implementation schedule established by 314 CMR 21.00 or a Watershed Permit; (d) Fail to conduct water quality monitoring in accordance with a permittee's monitoring plan; (e) Fail to report monitoring results as required by 314 CMR 21.05(2 - and 314 CMR 21.10(8 in the Annual Reports o ed b a Wate. s ea De.. (fg) Fail to file a five-year report pursuant to 314 CMR 21.10(1O)aeh eye he arge` th-r-eshold eaneentr-ations identified in an approved Water -shed Management Plafl; or (gh) Fail to comply with any other term, requirement, or provision of 314 CMR 21.00, an approved Watershed Management Plan or other Department approval, or a Watershed Permit. (3) Without limitation, the owner, operator, or other person in charge of the permittee's property, facility, operation, or activity, upon presentation of proper identification, shall give the Department and its authorized representatives free and unrestricted access to conduct inspections to verify compliance or investigate suspected violations relative to 314 CMR 21.00, a Watershed Permit, or other Department approvals issued pursuant to 314 CMR 21.00, by: (a) entering the permittee's premises at all reasonable times to examine and copy any records pertaining to the implementation of pollutant reduction actions authorized by an approved Watershed Management Plan or Watershed Permit and any records that must be kept under the conditions of the Watershed Permit; (b) entering and examining the permittee's properties, facilities, equipment, operations or activities regulated or required under the approved Watershed Management Plan or Watershed Permit; or (c) sampling or monitoring at reasonable times for the purpose of determining compliance with the terms and conditions of the approved Watershed Management Plan and Watershed Permit. 21.10: General Conditions The following general conditions apply to all Watershed Permits and shall be included therein: (1) Duty to Comply. Except as provided in 314 CMR 21.10(2), each permittee shall comply with all terms and conditions of this permit, 314 CMR 21.00, M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53, and all other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing is grounds for enforcement action, permit termination, permit revocation, permit modification, or denial of a permit renewal application. (2) Treatment of co -permittees. Notwithstanding 314 CMR 21.10(1), each co -permittee is severally liable for those activities they agree to carry out under the approved Watershed Management Plan. (3) Notification of Delays. Each permittee shall promptly notify the Department, in writing, upon learning of any delay in compliance with the implementation schedule established by this permit. Such notice shall state the anticipated length and cause of the delay, the measure or measures to be taken to minimize the delay, and a timetable for implementing the measure or measures. The permittee shall take appropriate measures to avoid or minimize any such delay. Notification will not shield the permittee from liability associated with noncompliance with the permit's implementation schedule. (4) Proper Operation and Maintenance. Each permittee, at all times, shall properly operate and maintain all Conventional and Alternative Control Approaches and Technologies and related appurtenances which are installed or used by the permittee pursuant to, or to achieve compliance with, the terms and conditions of this permit. (5) Du to Mitigate. Each permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any significant adverse impact on human health or the environment that may result from non-compliance with this permit. (6) Relationship to Other Permits. This permit shall not be construed to relieve the permittee, individually or collectively, of the obligation to comply with the terms and conditions of any other permit, order or approval, including any Section 401 Water Quality Certificate, issued by the Department. (7) Duty to Monitor. Each permittee shall carry out the approved monitoring activities established by this permit. Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring shall be representative of the monitored activity. Monitoring information required by this permit shall be retained for five years following the life of the permit, or as otherwise approved by the Department. Records of monitoring information include: (La) the date, exact location, and time of sampling or measurements; (21) the individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; (3c� the date(s) analyses were performed; (4d) the individual(s) who performed the analyses; (-5e) the analytical techniques or methods used; and (6f) the results of such analyses. Monitoring remelts must be conducted according to test procedures approved by the Department or the EPA for such purposes, unless other test procedures are specified in the permit. (8) Duty to Report Monitoring Results. Each permittee shall report to the Department the results of monitoring required by this permit pursuant to 314 CMR 21.051 21in the T:equif:ed Annual Reports. Each permittee shall report to the Department the results of monitoring performed for purposes of this permit at the intervals specified in this permit or in the permittee's approved monitoring plan. All reports prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit shall be available for public inspection. (9) Toxics Control. In conducting activities under this permit, each permittee shall not discharge any pollutant or combination of pollutants in toxic amounts. Any toxic components of such activities shall not result in any demonstrable harm to aquatic life or violate any state or federal law, regulation or water quality standard. (10) Anruial-Five-year_Reporting. Each permittee shall submit reports to the Department ev, The initial five-year report is due one -five years from the effective date of this permit and ea five years_ann-ua�thereafter until the end of the permit term. The reports shall contain information regarding activities of the previous ^five years. The following information shall be contained in each five-year report: (a) a description, including dates, of the installation of any treatment and control systems and facilities, or approaches taken, during the reporting period; (b) a summary of results of any monitoring information that has been collected and analyzed during the reporting period; (c) a performance evaluation of the treatment and control systems and facilities, and approaches taken, during the reporting period, including identification of any non- compliance, performance shortcomings, or challenges along with recommended corrective actions and optimization activities, as necessary; (d) a discussion of the activities planned, and the associated critical path for the next annual five-� ear reporting cycle, consistent with the implementation schedule; (e) a self-assessment review of compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit during the reporting period, and (f) evei=y fifth annual r-epeft shall i^'tideea progress report which describes the progress made in achieving the Necessary Nitrogen Load Reductions and water quality and habitat quality restoration goals required to achieve the designated uses for the waterbody, including an evaluation of the results of the permittee's water quality management program to date, any proposed adjustments and modifications to the strategies and practices under the approved Watershed Management Plan, pertinent sampling and monitoring results, including sentinel station monitoring results (if applicable), as well as other data pertinent to the technologies installed and approaches taken under the approved Watershed Management Plan as of the date of the report, any proposed nitrogen reduction credits for Alternative Control Approaches and Technologies aeeer-danee with 314 C-N4R 21.05i14, any changes requested to the approved implementation schedule, and any other information requested by the Department. (11) Modification of the Approved Watershed Management Plan or Implementation Schedule. A request for any modifications to the approved Watershed Management Plan or the implementation schedule established by this permit must be in writing. A modification of the plan or schedule shall become an effective and enforceable requirement under this permit upon the Department's approval of that modification in accordance with 314 CMR 21.06. (12) Notification of Contract Changes. In the event the permittees agree to amend an Intermunicipal Agreement or other mutually binding agreement governing their obligations under the Watershed Permit or one or more of the permittee(s) unilaterally rescinds, terminates or otherwise withdraws from the agreement, then the permittees shall promptly notify the Department in writing of such action. A permittee's withdrawal, termination, or rescission with respect to the agreement shall operate as a termination of the Watershed Permit with respect to that permittee and the terms of 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) requiring individual system upgrades and Best Available Nitrogen ReducinL- Techno, for New Construction shall go into effect in apply4e-the corresponding watershed area for each permittee to whom the termination is applicable pursuant to 314 CMR 21.10(14). (13) Duty to Provide Information. Each permittee shall furnish to the Department any information which is requested to determine compliance with this permit or whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, reissuing, or terminating the permit. Each permittee shall also furnish the Department, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. (14) Termination of Permit Coverage. Any one or more of the permittees may terminate coverage under this permit by providing written notice to the Department at least 60 days in advance of the date such termination is to take effect. Such notice shall include public notice of a public hearing to be held at least 30 days prior to the termination date. At least 30 days before the hearing, the permittee terminating coverage shall publish notice of the public hearing in the Environmental Monitor and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution both online and in hardcopy, if hardcopy exists, within the area that may be affected by the termination and in accordance with the provisions in 314 CMR 21.04(2)(d) for Environmental Justice Populations. The permittee terminating coverage will also request that notice be published in the local town or city hall and on the website of the community or communities that may be affected. The Department will post the notice on the Department's webpage. Such notice will not be construed to relieve any permittee, individually or collectively, of the obligations to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit while such coverage remains in effect. A permittee's termination of coverage under this permit shall operate as a termination of the Watershed Permit with respect to that permittee and the terms of 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) requiring individual system upgrades and Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology for new construction shall go into effect in appl34o-the corresponding watershed area for each permittee to whom the termination is applicable. (15) Facilily Closure Requirements. Each permittee shall notify the Department in writing at least 30 days prior to the closure of any treatment or control system or facility covered by this permit. The Department may require specific measures during deactivation of such systems to prevent any significant adverse health or environmental impacts. (16) Planned Changes. Each permittee shall notify the Department in writing as soon as possible of any planned alterations or additions to any treatment or control system or facility covered by this permit, provided that such alterations or additions are not subject to any other permit issued by the Department pursuant to 314 CMR 3:00: Surface Water Discharge Permit Program or 314 CMR 5.00: Ground Water Discharge Permit Program, or any Section 401 Water Quality Certificate issued by the Department. The Department may require specific measures to prevent any significant adverse health or environmental impacts that may result from such changes. (17) Anticipated Non-coM-1liance. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Department of any planned changes in the treatment, facilities, operations or activities authorized by the permit which may result in non-compliance with permit requirements within 30 days of acquiring knowledge or information that may result in non-compliance with the permit requirements. (18) Permit Actions. This permit may be modified or revoked by the Department in accordance with 314 CMR 21.06. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit term or condition. (19) Inspection and Entry. Each permittee shall allow the Department and its authorized representatives to enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records required by this permit are kept, to: access and copy, at reasonable times, any records pertaining to the implementation of pollutant reduction actions authorized by the approved Watershed Management Plan or the permit and any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit; inspect at reasonable times any properties, facilities, equipment, activities, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and sample or monitor at reasonable times for the purpose of determining compliance with the terms and conditions of the approved Watershed Management Plan and this permit. In addition, each permittee shall tmake reasonable efforts upon request of the Department to secure from the owners and operators of premises owned or operated by third parties access at all reasonable times to conduct such activities. (20) Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, or authorize any injury to private property, or any invasion of personal rights. (21) Compliance with Laws. The issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee of the permittee's obligations to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, ordinances and bylaws. (22) Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. (23) Duty of Public Availability. The permittee shall make all documents identified in 314 CMR 21.00 (including but not limited to: the application, draft permit, final permit, requests for modification, and annual reports) available to the public on the permittee's public website. The permittee shall put all documents on the website within 5 days of providing them to or receiving them from the Department, and all posted documents shall remain on the website throughout the permit term. (24) Permit Renewal. Any Watershed Permit issued under 314 CMR 21.00 may be renewed pursuant to 314 CMR 21.06one "yhe 4epa. niepA. To seek renewal, the permittee must file an application for renewal at least six months before the expiration date of the existing permit in accordance with the provisions of 314 CMR 21.06(4D. (25) Other Permits and Authorizations Unaffected. To the extent that any permittee is subject to a permit or legal authorization more stringent than the terms and conditions of the Watershed Permit, the permittee shall comply with the more stringent requirements. Further, the Department may issue permits and conduct other regulatory and enforcement activities as necessary within the watershed boundaries subject to the Watershed Permit without limitation. 21.11: Appeals During the 21 -day period following issuance of the Watershed Permit, the determination to deny the permit, or the issuance of significant permit modifications under 314 CMR 21.06(3-54) the applicant or any person aggrieved by the issuance or the determination, if that aggrieved person also filed comments during the public comment period or provided testimony at a public hearing, may file a request for an adjudicatory hearing. The appeal of a significant permit modification(s) shall be limited to the significant modification(s). The requirement to file written comments or provide testimony at a public hearing may only be excused if the final Watershed Permit reflects significant changes from the Department's tentative determination that could not be reasonably anticipated. If the Department revokes or terminates a Watershed Permit, the permittee may request an adjudicatory hearing within 21 days following issuance of the revocation or termination. The standing of a person to request an adjudicatory hearing and the procedures for filing such request are governed by M.G.L. c. 30A and 310 CMR 1.01: Adjudicatory Proceeding Rules for the Department of Environmental Protection. 21.1/-: lie Minimis Nitrooen Load Exemption 1 Any Local Government Unit may apply for a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption. Within twenty-eight hg t days of filing the application the applicant shall publish notice of the suspension of any applicable Title 5 uograde and New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2) in the forthcominy, Environmental Monitor,• on theapplicant's official website: in the town hall where similar notices are published_ and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution within the area that may be affected by the exemption. In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where the preceding method for publishing public notice does not specifically serve the Environmental Justice Population(s), the applicant must alsoVrovide the preceding notice to at least one additional news organization that primarily serves the Environmental Justice Population(s) within the area that may be affected by the designation. The public notice shall be translated into other languages that are prevalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiency. 2 Contents of an Application. The application shall contain sufficient information for the Department to evaluate whether it meets the applicable review criteria. At a minimum. the application shall include: (a) A complete application form provided by the Department for such puoiose: lbl Any planning documents, such as a CWMP, TWMP, or equivalent wastewater planning document applicable to the area for which the exemption is sought if available, mac} Sufficient evidence le.g., MEP. TMDL, or other Scientific Evaluation to show that the Baseline Nitrogen Load attributed to the applicable watershed or sub - watershed area. as applicable, licable is less than orequal to 3% of the Controllable Attenuated Nitrogen Load for the entire watershed or sub -watershed. as applicable; and (d) Sufficient evidence (e.g... records of water usage, building permits. zoning information, census data and, if necessgy. modelling) demonstrating that the applicant's Updated Nitrogen Load does not exceed 3% of the Controllable Attenuated Nitrogen Load for the watershed or sub -watershed. as anl2licable. 3 ) Alaroval of a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption. The Department shall approve a De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption application and issue an exemption approval letter to the applicant if it satisfies the requirements uirements of 314 CMR 21.120) 1 and (2). 14) Conditions for De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption. The exemption shall continue unless it is terminated by the Department or the Local Government Unit and shall be conditioned on the following requirements: (a) Upon request by the Department, the exempt Local Government Unit shall provide: i the Department with all requested information that is pertinent to nitrogen loading in the exem-it area and within the Local Government Unit's possession. custody, or control and ii access to ins iect the exempt area to verif compliance. b The Local Government Unit shall not increase its Updated Nitrogen Load. (c) If the Local Government Unit gains knowledge of any increase in the Updated Nitro yen Load it shall promptly report that to the Department. The report shall include an assessment ( deemed sufficient by the Department) of the extent to which the Updated Nitrogen Load has increased or may increase in the future. 1. If the assessment demonstrates the Updated Nitrogen Load has increased after considering, any proposed attenuated load reduction strategies, the exemption shall terminate. 2. Such termination shall operate to cause any applicable mandatory Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements in 310 CMR 15.215(2)1 d to become effective. (d) If the De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption operated to suspend the effectiveness of the Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2). then within twenty-eight days of the Department issuing a notice of termination to the exempt Local Government Unit or the De artment receiving notice that the exempt Local Government Unit has terminated the exemption, the Department will publish notice of the termination and that the mandatory Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements in 310 CMR 15.215(2)(d) are invoked. effective on the date the Department issues the notice of termination to the Local Government Unit. The Department shall publish notice of the termination and invocation of the Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements: in the forthcoming Environmental Monitor; on the Department's website,• in the town hall where similar notices are published,• and in a local or regional newspaper with the largest readership distribution within the area that may be affected by the Title 5 upgrade requirement. In municipalities with Environmental Justice Populations where the precedim4 method for publishin public notice does not specifically serve the Environmental Justice Population(s). the Department must also provide the preceding notice to at least one additional news organization that primarily serves the Environmental Justice Population{ s } within the area that may be affected by the designation. The public notice shall be translated into other lan gua =es that are 12revalent in areas with persons of limited English proficiencv. 5 Withdrawal or Denial. If the a licant withdraws from the De Minimis Nitrogen Load Exemption application process or is denied an exemption, the Department will issue notice of the withdrawal or denial and invocation of the mandato Title 5 upgrade and New Construction requirements under 310 CMR 15.215(2), if applicable. in conformity with the notice publication requirements in 314 CMR 21.12(4) June 26, 2023 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 brhealthC brewster-ma.go WW W.BREWSTER-MA.GOV United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20460 Via: RISSAComments(u:e a. rov RE: Proposed Machine Gun Range at Joint Base Cape Cod Health Department Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, RS. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant The Environmental Protection Agency analyzed the potential risk to Cape Cod's sole aquifer presented by a proposed multi-purpose machine gun range desired by the Massachusetts Army National Guard on Joint Base Cape Cod. Your agency found that the project has the potential to contaminate Cape Cod's sole water source, a single underground aquifer, creating a significant public health hazard. We concur that the proposed gun range is a threat to all who live, work on, and visit Cape Cod and depend on high quality, safe drinking water. The Brewster Board of Health opposes the establishment of the proposed machine gun range. We recognize and respect the duty of the US Armed Forces to adequately train and prepare military personnel in order to carry out national defense activities. However, Brewster has taken multiple steps over decades to protect our drinking water. Because all fifteen communities in Barnstable County share the same water source, contamination in one area could lead to contamination for all 15 towns. Thank you for the careful analysis of health risks that you carried out. There is no rationale important enough that could be asserted by the Massachusetts Army National Guard to justify the creation of a credible health threat to the residents and visitors of Cape Cod. Clean water is essential to human life and it must be the priority. Sincerely, Kimberly Pearson Vice -Chair, Board of Health Brewster, Massachusetts IAJS7—MI) fil Fff- J Q W I S PATC H _V MJ W Resources and Information about Local Public Health NACCHO NEWS 2023 NACCH0360 Conference Public health professionals from across the country are cony at the NACCH0360 Annual Conference, on July 10-13 in Den } Colorado, to share opportunities, challenges, best practices, success stories; engage with federal, state, and local partner! and gain insights from public health experts. Due to overwhelming response NACCH0360 has reached maximum capacity and in-person registration is closea. If you would like to be added to a waitlist to attend in-person, complete the form online at http://www.naccho360.com/register. The waitlist is not a guarantee of registration, so we encourage you to register virtually. The Virtual Registration fee includes access to on -demand pre-recorded sessions, livestream sessions, and live Q&A opportunities during our plenaries and livestreamed sessions. Virtual content, including livestream and virtual -only sessions, will be recorded and available for 90 days post -conference for both in-person and virtual registrants. IV PublicHealth Prevent. Promote. Protect. NACCHO Awards $300,000 to Local Health Departments to Support Increased Vaccine Uptake ,,. NACCHO, with support from the CDC, has selected three `0 local health departments to participate as host sites in Cohort III of the Equipping Local Health Departments to Address Vaccine Hesitancy Project. Through this project, local health departments will receive $100,000 to address issues related to vaccine hesitancy and misinformation, establish partnerships, and identify other areas for improvement of increasing vaccine confidence. More information on the grant and its awardees can be found at https://www.naccho.org/blog/articles/naccho-awards-300- 000-to-local-health-departments-to-support-increased-vaccine-uptake. What Local Health Departments Should Know About ChatGPT and Al „ �, �• ChatGPT can be used in public health to revolutionize the healthcare system in many ways. Chat-GPT—generative pretrained transformer—is a "chatbot" designed to have human -like conversations and assist with tasks such as essay writing, programming, and creating content, to name a few. Local health departments (LHDs) around the country are tackling how to use and limit the use of this technology within their organizations. As pros and cons of Al continue to evolve, our Local Health IT Community of Practice will provide more insight on how it may benefit public health departments and the healthcare industry. If you're interested in ChatGPT or other IT -related technology, training, or useful information, connect with NACCHO's LHIT Community of Practice at http://www.naccho.org/lhit. In the Spotlight... Marking the End of the National Public Health Emergency Declaration for COVID-19 May 11 marked the end of the COVID-19 federal public health emergency. Read reflections on the pandemic response and where we go from here in a statement by NACCHO CEO Lori Tremmel Freeman at https://www.naccho.org/blog/ articles/marking-the-end-of-the- national-public-health-emergency- declaration-for-covid-19. Partner with CFA to Improve Outbreak Response Using Disease Modeling and Analytics CDC's Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (CFA) is announcing a new notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) to establish an outbreak response network for disease forecasting to support decisionmakers during public health emergencies. This NOFO will enhance our national ability to control epidemics and pandemics by developing a network of innovators to design, prototype, test, and scale up disease forecasting and data modeling tools and technologies. Public, academic, and private sector partners are encouraged to apply by the Friday, July 14 application deadline to participate in the network established via cooperative agreement. Please note, applicants must submit a letter of intent (LOI) by midnight of Wednesday, June 14. The new program will support advanced development of modeling, forecasting tools, and outbreak analytics through three critical operations: innovation, integration, and implementation. Funding recipients will work alongside CFA to establish a national network to support state and local decisionmakers during future public health emergencies. Additionally, the cooperative agreement will fund state and local recipients to plan, prepare for, and respond to future infectious disease outbreaks. Prospective funding recipients can visit https:// www.cdc.gov/forecast-outbreak-analytics/nofo.htmi to learn more. Demystifying Infant Feeding Data to Strengthen Continuity of Care (CoC) Webinar Join NACCHO's Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Team on Wednesday, June 28 from 1:00-2:30 PM ET, for the final webinar of the Every Step of the Way through the 1,000 Days series, entitled "Demystifying Infant Feeding Data to Strengthen Continuity of Care (CoC)" The focus is Recommendation Four of the Continuity of Care in Breastfeeding Support. A Blueprint for Communities: "Develop a shared community breastfeeding database system to track infant feeding consistently for community health collective impact efforts." To register for the webinar, visit https:Hnaccho.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_CLV7WH INSZgv_ mGBf6SZig#/registration. To view the Continuity of Care in Breastfeeding Support. A Blueprint for Communities document, visit http://www.breastfeedingcontinuityofcare.org/blueprint. Request for Proposals: Consultant to Develop Communications Products for Community Prevention Framework Pilot Project NACCHO is seeking a consultant to develop a suite of communications materials highlighting the Strengthening Capacity in Suicide, Overdose, and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Community Prevention Framework Pilot project and awardees. The consultant Public Health Dispatch • June 2023 will engage with five LHDs and develop communications products that showcase the planning and implementation efforts of these communities addressing the intersection of suicide, overdose, and ACEs, as well as work with NACCHO to develop materials that highlight the outcomes of the overarching Community Prevention Framework Pilot project. Please see application requirements and full details of the project in the Requests for Proposals (RFP) at https://www.naccho.org/ uploads/downloadable-resources/ Strengthen ing-Ca pacity-in-Suicide- Overdose-ACEs-Prevention-for- LHD_Communications-Consultant_ RFP_final.pdf. Proposals should be submitted electronically, in pdf format and sent via e-mail to amyrick@naccho. org. The deadline for submission is Friday, June 23 at 11:59 PM EST. Recorded Webinar: Exploring Long COVID's Effect on Organs Understanding how SARS-CoV-2 can affect the body and result in long COVID is critical to inform clinical trials and future treatments. RECOVER researchers Dr. Benjamin tenOever (New York University), Dr. Douglas Fraser (Western University), and Dr. James Heath (Institute for Systems Biology and University of Washington) presented their work to the April 11 R3 Seminar on Organ Damage and Reprogramming of Host Tissues and Organs. The presenters shared their research on organ systems affected after SARS-CoV-2 infection and how their findings can help us understand and predict long COVID. Dr. James Stone (Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School) tied together themes from the presentations and asked presenters to discuss the role that viral persistence and vaccination play in this research area. To watch the webinar, visit https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=tzWuwhIRzFw. 11 Public Health Dispatch • June 2023 Report: Strengthening Local Capacity for Wastewater Surveillance In response to the increased interest around the use of E, ' wastewater surveillance g - technology to track SARS- CoV-2, NACCHO, supported by funding from the CDC, launched a pilot mentorship program in 2022 to support LHDs building wastewater surveillance capacity. City of Tempe, which had experience utilizing wastewater surveillance to track diseases, was matched with LHD mentees Genesee and Orleans County (NY) and Chautauqua County (NY) to exchange guidance, tools, resources, and recommendations to meet their community's infectious disease surveillance needs. See the findings, lessons learned, and additional resources for LHDs at https://www.naccho.org/uploads/downloadable- resources/Mentorship-Pilot-Program_edited.pdf. Resource: Achieving Environmental Health Equity The American Public Health Association's (APHA) Environmental Health and Equity Collaborative created an issue brief that provides background, examples, data and actionable steps environmental public health leaders and their organizations can take to move towards health equity. Actions are organized by the CDC's Ten Essential Public Health Services and include a poster and summary version for easy reference. You can view the brief and summaries at https://apha. org/Topics-and-Issues/Environmental-Health/Partners/ Environmental -Health -and -Equity -Collaborative. Catching Up with the 2022 FDA Retail Food Protection Seminar The 2022 seminar, hosted by NACCHO, had a focus on norovirus, including assessing employee health, investigating norovirus related foodborne illnesses, and implementing successful employee health intervention strategies. All sessions, including breakout and workshops, are now available online as recordings to watch for free at https://www.naccho.org/blog/articles/catching u p-with-the-2022-fda-reta i I -food -seminar. Disability -Inclusive Work Cultures for LHDs Building a disability- 7� inclusive workforce can improve community partnerships and employee retention, innovation, and workplace relationships. About 25% of U.S. adults have a disability, and disability access is not always included in diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. There are many resources available for LHDs to build more disability -inclusive workforces to support their communities. Learn more through NACCHO's blog post at https://www.naccho.org/blog/articles/disability- inclusive-work-cultures-for-local-health-departments. ■ Public Health Dispatch • June 2023 .k Finding Passion and Purpose in Our Public Health Work with NACCHO's Joy in Work Resources Although May was Mental Health Awareness Month, NACCHO is , icontinuing to support ongoing mental health issues with resources that help its o NACCHO members regain a sense of purpose and passion for the work they do in public health. The Joy in Work Toolkit is an adapted version of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI's) "Framework for Improving Joy in Work;' modified to meet the needs of the local governmental public health workforce. The Framework was developed in 2017 as a tool for healthcare organizations to better understand barriers to joy in work that lead to high rates of staff turnover and burnout, and co -create strategies to address them. Access the toolkit here at bit.ly/3TIRLZc. The toolkit includes an adapted version of the IHI's "What Matters to You" Conversation Guide for leaders and an Action Guide adapted by NACCHO with strategies to promote joy in work and teaches a conversation style that identifies barriers and supports for joy in work. NACCHO presented a webinar to learn about how to address these growing concerns and apply practical strategies to increase joy in the workplace, in "Having Conversations That Matter in Local Public Health" In this webinar, NACCHO explored the conversation framework that opens dialogue to identify barriers and subsequently promote joy in work."Conversations That Matter" has the power to change the way that we work with each other and provides real strategies for increasing staff well-being. Watch the recording at bit.ly/3NfPSCH. Public Health Dispatch • June 2023 Public Health Accreditation Board Launches FPHS Capacity and Cost Assessment Tool The Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS) were developed in 2013 to define a minimum package of public health capabilities and programs that no jurisdiction can be without. PHAB's Public Health National Center for Innovations, in collaboration with the University of Minnesota Center for Public Health Systems, has launched the FPHS Capacity and Cost Assessment to support health departments and health department systems in understanding their current spending and capacity towards the national FPHS framework and the needed investments to fully implement the FPHS. If you are interested in using the tool, reach out to info@phnci.org, and to learn more about the FPHS Capacity and Cost Assessment, visit the tool website at https:// phnci.org/transformation/fphs-capacity-cost-assessment. Connect with Health in All Policies Practitioners on Linkedln Working to implement a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach in your jurisdiction but don't know where to start? Have a Linkedln profile? You're in luck! HiAP practitioners, academia, partners, and interested public health professionals with a Linkedln profile are welcome to join NACCHO's group to share resources, ask questions, and network with peers on ways to ensure that policy decisions have neutral or beneficial impacts on the determinants of health. NACCHO staff will be available to answer questions and will routinely share relevant tools and resources on this platform, alongside other national organizations. Visit https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/12788027/ to join the group today! Don't have a Linkedln profile? It's easy to sign up on linkedin.com. ■ Preview Report: 2022 Preparedness Profile Since 2016, NACCHO has conducted the Preparedness Profile study every few years to provide a foundation for future public health preparedness initiatives. This nationally representative assessment gathers information from local health departments (LHDs) about preparedness trends and emerging issues to inform priorities at the local, state, and national levels. LHDs playa key role in achieving national health security by preparing their communities for public health emergencies, responding when they occur, and lending support through the recovery process. The 2022 Preparedness Profile, to be released later this year, will provide findings from a multitude of topics in local health preparedness, including administrative preparedness, partnerships with local entities and communities, and at -risk and vulnerable populations served in preparedness planning. See a preview of the 2022 report at https://www. naccho.org/blog/articles/preview-2022prep-profile. medics reserVE corps Celebrating National Volunteer Week 2023: MRC Volunteer Spotlights Volunteers are the heart and the hands of the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC). During the COVID-19 response, units across the country saw a surge in new volunteers, growing the network from approximately 179,000 volunteers in early 2020 to over 300,000 in 2022. During roughly that same time, volunteers contributed 3.8 million hours with an economic value of $132 million. During April, Global Volunteer Month, we paused to say thank you to the volunteers of the Medical Reserve Corps. While it is impossible to recognize each individual who contributes to the network, we highlighted just a few of those MRC volunteers who support their communities. Read their stories at https:// www.naccho.org/blog/articles/volunteer-week-2023. Building Workforce Resilience through the Practice of Psychological First Aid: A Course for Leaders and Teams NACCHO, in partnership with ASPR, has developed a new Psychological First Aid course for leaders and teams. This course offers participants the opportunity to consider and pursue strategies for supporting colleagues and team members during a disaster response as stress levels increase for workers and the demands on your organization become more urgent. The goal of this course is to help individuals cope with stress at manageable levels, making it possible for them to effectively function and build resilience with each successive event they encounter. Access this free course at https://www.naccho.org/blog/ articles/new-course-building-workforce-resilience- through-the-practice-of-psychological-first-aid. Invitation to Author:"From the Field" Column NACCHO is pleased to invite — authors for the Health Security journal's "From the Field" column. "From the Field" is a semi - regular column that explores what it means to be a local health professional on the front lines of an emergency. NACCHO members share their stories of preparing for and responding to disasters, epidemics, and other major health issues. If you are interested in taking advantage of this opportunity to publish insights from your community, please contact Beth Hess at bhess@naccho.org. Additional details can be found at https://bit.ly/37Kjsdo. Two New Administrative F Preparedness Resources NACCHO, in partnership with Deloitte Consulting LLP, has released two administrative preparedness resources: the Situation Report Template and the Emergency Staffing Plan Template. The Emergency Staffing Plan Template is a tool to help develop a preparedness plan for rapid staffing during emergencies or disasters, and the Situation Report Template is for public health officials to use as they identify and circulate relevant information during disasters caused by natural, man- made, and technological hazards. To view the Situation Report Template, visit https://www.naccho.org/uploads/ full-width-images/ESFB-Situation-Reporting-Template- FINAL-April-2023.pdf.To view the Emergency Staffing Plan Template, visit https://www.naccho.org/uploads/full-width- images/Emergency-Staffing-Plan-FINAL-April-2023.pdf. 0 Public Health Dispatch • June 2023 ;5t FeoMWASHINGTON The End of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency and its Impact on Public Health By Lauren Mastroberardino, Government Affairs Senior Specialist and Adriane Casalotti, Chief of Government and Public Affairs �rrrir r i �tirriM *_ NIRMW The Federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency was months. However, the Department of Health and declared in early 2020 to provide flexibility for the Human Services (HHS) still has a supply of vaccines federal government to address COVID-19. Since then, the and antiviral treatment, so they are still available at no declaration has been renewed every 90 days, allowing cost to everyone, including those without insurance. the federal government to access certain funds, waive Once the federal supply runs out, people not covered or modify certain program requirements, and to collect certain data in a timelier way. The Declaration expired on Thursday, May 11, with the White House stating that our current tools and the state of the virus allow for a transition away from the emergency response. Many of the government's response efforts over the past three years have been rolled back to a pre -pandemic posture, while others remain. During the pandemic, Congress enacted legislation to provide additional flexibilities tied to emergency declarations, many of which have also expired. Throughout this letter is a round -up of some of the issues most relevant to public health: Data: Some data reporting to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been impacted by the end of the PHE, including vaccination coverage and reporting for test positivity. Without test positivity data, CDC has discontinued its COVID-19 Community Levels classifications and is now utilizing COVID-19 hospital admissions data to convey COVID-19 activity in a specific area. CDC continues to use available data on emergency department visits, laboratory test positivity, and wastewater surveillance as early indicators of COVID-19 increase. The cadence of data reporting will also change. Vaccines and Treatments: The government is transitioning COVID-19 vaccines and treatments to the commercial market within the next few Public Health Dispatch • June 2023 by Medicaid are likely to face out-of-pocket expenses for antiviral treatments. COVID-19 vaccines should remain available at no cost to patients covered by private insurance, because it is classified as a routine preventative service, like the flu shot. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is working with manufacturers to transition products to traditional approval methods and has indicated that emergency use authorizations (EUAs) will be maintained for as long as needed. Testing: Private insurers are no longer required to cover the costs of at-home or lab -based diagnostic tests. However, some testing for the uninsured will be available through CDCs Increasing Community Access to Testing program via pharmacies. OtherTopics: Some telehealth flexibilities granted by the PHE remain in place, and work requirements for federal food assistance programs have returned in many states. Title 42, which permitted the United States to deny asylum and migration claims due to public health threats, has ended. A lot has changed, but some key mitigation measures remain the same. NACCHO Government Affairs continues to monitor the PHE unwinding and will provide insight to local public health leaders as the process continues. a W 2 V CO a I S PATC H Resources and Information about Local Public Health UPCOMING EVENTS National Violent Death Reporting System Conference May 16-18,2023 Milwaukee, WI https://www.nvdrsconference.org/ NACCH0360 Conference July 10—July 13, 2023 Denver, CO https://www.naccho360.org/home Insights from the LAC DPH Youth Advisory Council: A Model for Replicability ) IThe Los Angeles Department of Public Health serves 10,441,080 peopleand strivesto improve the lives of LA County residents through its 39 programs and 14 public health centers. One of the Positive Youth development Initiatives that began in 2019 is the Los Angeles County (LAC) Department of Public Health (DPH) Youth Advisory Council (YAC) which is a service -learning approach that utilizes the learned experience of adolescents to inform our youth -oriented programming and improve adolescent health. The youth advisors ages range from 16 to 21 years old and represent the demographic, geographic, cultural, and socio-economic diversity of the LAC population. As a result of the program, we have fostered an ongoing partnership between youth and adults at DPH to collaborative on decisionmaking aimed at improving adolescent health outcomes. The introduction of PYDI in DPH has provided the opportunity to address various health inequities among by having youth representation within the department to inform on program planning and interventions thus helping public health not only to tailor programming to their needs but to understand adolescence through a developmental lens. Traditionally, many public health programs targeting adolescents focus on solving single issues like drug abuse or teen pregnancy. However, the PYD framework in our program focuses on enhancing strengths of youth participants instead of addressing weaknesses. By engaging youth in this manner one can improve their competence, confidence, connection, character, and compassion (the 5 C's of PYD). This in turn ends up improving their overall health and well-being. To learn more about the model practice, visit https://nacchoapplication. secure-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/23/details/2165. www.naccho.org 0 M"NI-Y I UUIVH ABOUT THE RED LIST The Living Building Challenge (LBC) Red List represents the "worst in class" materials, chemicals, and elements known to pose serious risks to human health and the greater ecosystem that are prevalent in the building products industry. The International Living Future Institute (ILFI) believes that these materials should be phased out of production due to human and/or environmental health and toxicity concerns. While there are certainly other items that could be added, this list was determined by selecting items with the greatest potential impact if they were significantly curbed or eliminated from the building industry. ILFI worked with the Healthy Building Network and the Pharos Project to develop the original Red List in 2005.. Red List classes are added or retired with each new version of the LBC Standard. The revised chemical groupings that were established as part of the LBC 4.0 release more suitably categorize Red. List chemicals by function, application within the building products sector and. structural similarity. The chemical classes are described below, and the chemicals included in each group are detailed in the 2023 LBC Red List CASRN Guide. While all chemicals in the 2023 LBC Red List CASRN Guide fall within the list of chemical classes outlined in the Standard, not necessarily all chemicals in an LBC Red List Class are included in the enforceable CASRN Guide. The CASRN Guide itself is typically updated on an annual basis in January, and seeks to ensure that the Red List remains a leadership tool and reflects best -available science. THE WATCH LIST With the release of the Living Building_ Challenge 4.0, ILFI also introduced the LBC Watch List. The intent of the LBC Watch List is to signal to manufacturers and project teams that ILFI has identified certain chemicals and compound groups for potential inclusion in the LBC Red List. The Watch List does not impact a product's Declaration Status, nor the ability of project teams to use MEMBEP LGG!N HOME ABOUT PRUURAMS CUMMUNIIY C_UNIAUI UUNAIE List Inclusion. Sugstances on the Watcn List may iDe aaciitionaliy clesignateci as --priority Tor ReCi List Inclusion" (Priority) to indicate ILFI's intent to add them to the Red List in future versions. A chemical must be designated as "Priority" for at least 12 months before it can be added to the Red List - Priority designation provides a transparent "on-ramp" for the Red List, gives space and time for stakeholder dialogue about when and if to add those -substances to the -Red List, and provides manufacturers and consumers alike time to phase these chemicals out of products and design, contributing to the collective goal of a healthier materials economy. A chemical designated as Priority for Red List Inclusion will flag in light orange on a Declare label, but does not impact the product's Declaration Status. CASR'Ns maybe added to the Watch List, or designated as Priority as part of ILFf's quarterly update of its program resources. Substances will only be added to the enforceable Red List from the Priority List, and only as part of an LBC Red List Annual Update that occurs in January of a given year. Substances may also be "downgraded" from the Red List to Priority or Watch List or removed entirely from any list as part of the annual update process. 1LFl-believes -thatthistranspaTency-and -updateschedulewillresult-in a Red--Listthatisregularly reviewed for alignment with best available science and market realities, and will push the industry further and faster towards a future free of toxic chemicals and materials. ANNUAL UPDATES TO THE LBC RED LIST LLF.I co.m.m-its to _a co.m..p.reherasive ann-ual .rev.iew a.n.d update of the co.mp.osit.io.n of the.LBC .Real List and LBC Watch List in order to reflect the evolution of voluntary restricted substances lists and global regulations as well as innovation of the building products manufacturing industry. Each annual update is supported by ILFI staff research and recommendations from a rotating advisory group whose membership consists of non-profit organizations, toxicology professionals and safer chemistry advocates. Using the Healthy Building Network's Pharos project, ILFI identifies and adds chemical CASRNs to the -LBC Reel -List chemical classes through both individual additions and class -based approaches of functional and structural similarity. Methodologies for inclusion utilize hazard screening based on GreenScreen Benchmark scores from full GreenScreen assessments and GreenScreen List Translator scores that are presented within Pharos, and a consideration of authoritative lists (lists based on a comprehensive expert review by a recognized authoritative body) in which a chemical is included as well as latest available environmental toxicology research and scientific reports. The result -is a -Red List and Watch List that affirm the precautionary principle in their intention and design, represent the collective knowledge of the industry in a unified and aligned voice, and emphasize their role as tools for advocacy.The currently effective LBC Red List and LBC Watch List are effective as of May 1, 2023. Prior to this, the lists were Ilast updated in April 2022. The 2023 update to the Lists continues due diligence efforts to move chemicals to the Red List, through the 12 -month minimum period of Priority for Red List Inclusion designation, and continues the Red List's function as an effective screening tool of the pulse of the sustainable buildings and products sectors. In addition, movements of CASRNs between the Red List and Watch List provide ILFI the ability to make other significant changes for the subsequent annual update, a prioritization process that will be completed by ILFI as part of each annual update's planning process. The updates to the list are summarized below. ILFI encourages its community of users and the greater industry to examine the 2023 LBC Red List CASRN Guide for specific CASRN updates and changes. Alkylphonols and related compounds I No cbwgn. No cnargn. No changes. Antimicrobials (marketed with a health No duttges. No changes. No changes. claim) Asbestos compounds No eungec• No Borges. No charges. Bisphenol A (BPA) and Structural No Changes No Cayman, No du gen. analogues No Changes. I Nodugm Nocannes. ealifomla-banned solvents Chtorinated Polymers No dwlges. No durmps. NO Changes. I No changes. No Burges. No changes. No charges. e40 charges. chlorobenzonos CMorofluoroearbons (CFCs) and No changes. hydrochwotluorocarbons (HCFCs) Formaldehyde (added) No drarrgas. No lunges. No dungm Monomeric, pvlymawlc. and organophosphate halogenated flame No lunges. No dungen. No lunges. retardants (MPRs) _ organotin compounds NO Cha g*%. No lunges. No ChMW£ Perfluorirnated and Polynuormatod Alkyl 5.938 CAUMS added eom Substances (PEAS) / Pnoeny Ust No charges. No lunges. P9muodn2ted cc T i, .- ,cls PFCs Nocharges- NO Changes. No changes. Phthalates(orthophthalates) Polychlorinated bephonyls(PCBs) pp' No lunges. k b No flanges. No changes, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS) eso changes. No dwepes. No lunges. Short -chain and medhm-chain 140 mss. I No changes, No ctunges. chlorinated paramns Toxic heavy metals i No drarg� I 1111 No changes- No Changes• Volatile organic compounds (Voes) In No changes. wet- appiled products Wood Treatments containing creosote _ iso Change,.No Changes No changes, or pwntachlorophonol .VOW" organic mnFoaeds (VoCs) n onsite wet-appued products arc not barnK but eawt have VCC Wass, below dw Soudl Coast Air (aoaWy Managsrsers. District tSCAOMD) Rise nee W Adhesives and sealants or the CARD ao07 slggeSMd Control MOUMne (SCM) ter ANIVWCIO al Coatings. as apFlcabu. NOTABLE CHANGES IN 2023 Perfluorinated andPolI luorrnated"Alley Substance (PEAS) / Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs), rn 2023, ILFI moved 5,938 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from the Priority List to the Red List. This continues the process of restricting PFAS as a class, and brings the total number of PFAS on the Red List to 10,819 compounds. Please review the following resources for additional information regarding ILFI's decision and guidance for program compliance. Fact Sheet: The Living Building Challenge (LB ) Red List 2022 Up at - A Guide for Pro' ct Teams Fact Sheet: The Living Building C al enge (LBC) -Red List 2022 Updates: A Guide for Manufacturers HOW ANNUAL LBC RED LIST CHANGES AFFECT PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS An active Declare label'with a status of LBC Red' List Free, LBC Red List Approved, or LBC Compliant at the time of specification (when the project team places the product order with the manufacturer) is sufficient documentation of product compliance with 113 Red List. This remains true even if a constituent chemical in the product is added to the Red List prior to the label's LOGIN HOME ABOUT PROGRAMS COMMUNITY CONTACT DONATE manUTaciurer submits the prooUCt Tor its annual latDel renewal. At inaI time, a product wltn a Declare status of LBC Red List Free, LBC Red List Approved, or LBC Compliant may subsequently receive Declared status because a constituent chemical was subsequently added to the Red List end th.e.product formulation wasn't changed. JLF.I will inform project tea,mst.hat if they did -not. document the compliance status of the Declare label at the time of specification, they may cross- reference the Red List ingredient identified on the renewed Declare label with the contents of the Red List at the time of.project registration, to demonstrate compliance. ALKYLPHENOLS AND RELATED COMPOUNDS Alkylphenols area large family of organic compounds used -in a -wide variety of products, including cleaning products, beauty products, contraceptives, coatings, fragrances, thermoplastics, carbonless copy paper, and agrochemicals. Most concerns are focused on alkylphenol ethoxylates (AP'Es), which'bioaccumu'late-and'have'been shown to cause endocrine disruption irrfish. AP'Esare in cleaning products that end up in waterways from wastewater treatment effluent. Some alkylphenols, especially nonylphenol, are being phased out in Europe, and more research into their impacts is needed. A few governments with environmentally preferable purchasing programs restrict or ban APES • REF: http://www2,mst.dk/UdgiyZpublications/2013/04/978-87-92903-99-O.pdf ANTIMICROBIALS (MARKETED WITH A HEALTH CLAIM) Antimicrobials are -a class -of chemicals designed -to -kill or inhibit the growth of•micr.-obes, Antimicrobials are frequently used in soaps and building materials, including countertops, paints, and doorknobs. Nineteen antimicrobials were banned in soaps and bodywashes by the FDA in 2016- Antimicrobials used in building materials are regulated by the. .EPA. as a pesticide, falling outside of the scope of the FDA's ban. Antimicrobials are often used as a preservative in building materials, but the health benefits of their use have not been established or substantiated. Some antimicrobials are endocrine disruptors, and have been shown to impair learning and weaken muscle function. I,n.terest in building_ products with applied antimicrobial treatments has increased significantly during the recent global COVID-19 pandemic. While information regarding individual substances' efficacy in controlling propagation of SAPS-CoV-2 remains incomplete, "no evidence yet exists to demonstrate. that -products. intended -for use in interior spaces that inc-orporate antimicrobial additives result in healthier populations." (COVID-19 Statement: Understanding Antimicrobial Ingredients in Building Materials, Perkins and Will and Healthy Building Network (2020)) ILFI continues to monitor the situation and commits to presenting current information about reported or potential human and environmental health impacts of antimicrobial substances as commonly used within the building industry and supporting its community of users in best utilizing this information in their own practice. • REF: https:/js3.amazonaws.comlhbnweb.prod uploadslfileslFj4p_COVID Antimicrobial_WhitePaper _Perkin: ASBESTOS COMPOUNDS. Asbestos is a mineral fiber that is used in a variety of construction materials for its strength and heat resisting capabilities. It is often found in wall insulation, vinyl floor coverings, paint OME NATE • REF: https:J/www.epa.goy/asbestos/learn-about-asbestos BISPHENOL A (BPA) AND STRUCTURAL ANALOGUES Bisphenol A (BPA) and chemicals with structural or functional similarity, or BPA structural analogues (NTP 2017), are used to manufacture polycarbonate plastics, epoxy resins and other products. The plastics are used in many consumer products, such as drink bottles, DVDs, eyeglass lenses, electronics, car parts, and other products that must not break easily. Epoxy resins are used for lining.food cans and water pipes, and for many sales receipts. Most recent testing in animal models and epidemiological studies in humans have shown that early life BPA exposure adversely effect neurological function and development, as well as adversely affect male sex organs (such as the prostate gland) in fetuses, infants, and small children (Inadera 2015). Most health organizations advise against the use of BPA for baby bottles and related infant products. BPA has also been found in breast milk demonstrating that this chemical has the potential to expose infant populations. BPA structural. analogues such as Bisph..en.ol-S. (BPS). are often. less legally restricted and considered a "regrettable substitution" for BPA and pose many of the same risks as BPA. • REF: haps: ntp.n'e�gov/whatwestudylassessmentslnoncancerJcomple e palindex.l tmi. • REF: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc/articles/PMC46612 CALWORNIA-BANNED SOLVENTS California -banned solvents herein refer to the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) designated as Group 41 -Exempt Compounds by South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) Rule 102. This designation results from the US EPA's use of the criterion of smog formation (defined as an organic compound's contribution to the formation of ground -level ozone) to inform the regulatory definition of a VOC. As a result, U5 federal air quality regulations focus on VOCs that increase ground -level ozone concentrations, and exempt (meaning exclude) compounds with negligible reactivity. The basis of this determination is the ground -level ozone forming potential of ethane. Rules promulgated by South Coast AQMD (including Rulel113-Architectural Coatings Rule 1143 - Consumer Paint Thinners and Multi -Purpose Solvents, and Rule 1168 - Adhesive and Sealant Applications) therefore serve as gap -filling measures, limiting exempt compounds' product concentration and content by regulation -when they are not regulated- by the EPA. Additionally following these Rules that limit the percentage by weight of these exempt compounds in their respective product types, cyclic, branched, or linear, volatile completely methylated siloxanes (VMS) are not subject to the percentage by weight limit and are not included in the LBC Red List. Though the South Coast AQMD is an authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) overseeing specific sectors of the California building products market, its restrictions on VOCs are considered industry -exemplars and have influenced. a. significant proportion of these product industries to conform to its standards. • REF: https://www.agmd•gov/home/rules-compliance compliance/vocs/exempts rou =ii CHLORINATED POLYMERS, INCLUDING PVC, PVDC, CHLOROPRENE (NEOPRENE MONOMER), AND CPVC ER in. zne..proauucuan at aaxrns ana. aisposar pnaaes- uroxinsaresame or xne most pa entcomns known to humans, with no known safe limit for exposure and a strong propensity for bioaccumulation. In addition, dioxins are highly persistent in the environment. ChJoroprene is a, Persistent Organic Poll utant.Source Material-Dueto its carbon- chlorine base,. chloroprene contributes to the creation of dioxins at different points in its life cycle (often manufacturing and/or disposal). According to the World Health Organization, dioxins are some of the most ,potent toxins known to humans, with no known safe limit for exposure and a strong propensity for bioaccumulation. In addition, dioxins are highly persistent in the environment. Ch.lorinated_Polyethylene {,CPE). and _Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene (CSPE), are Persistent_Qr.ganic- Pollutant Source Materials: due to their carbon -chlorine bases, these products contribute to the creation of dioxins and furans at different points in their life cycle (often manufacturing and/or disposal}. According to. the Wosid Health 0rgan:izati n, dioxins are s4ame cif the most patent toxins_ known to humans, with no known safe limit for exposure and a strong propensity for bioaccumulation. In addition, dioxins are highly persistent in the environment. Similarly, furans accumulate in animal fat, concentrating as they travel up the food chain. Non -chlorinated polyethylene products are readily available in many product categories. • REF (dioxins): https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dioxins-and-their-effects-on- human-health CHLOROBENZENES Chlorobenzene is used primarily as a solvent, a degreaser for auto parts, and a chemical intermediary for making- other chemicals, so exposures are prirrrariiya riskto workers making- or using it. Most exposures are through inhalation of fumes. Short-term exposure can cause headaches, sleepiness, nausea, numbness, muscle spasms, and in extreme cases, unconsciousness. Chronic {iong-term) exposure -can cause -increased signs of neurotoxicity -(numbness, etc.) and - irritation of the upper respiratory tract. In animals, chronic exposure has also caused kidney and liver damage. Chlorobenzene is broken down by sun and bacteria in the environment and does not accumulate. in. the food chain. • PER https:/Jwww-n.cdc.goy/TSP/ToxFAQs/ToxFAQsDetails.as p2?fagid=488&toxid=87 CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS (CFCS} AND- HYDROC 4LOROFLUOROCARBONS (HCFCS) According to US EPA., the depletion of the Earth's,protective ozone layer by chlorofluorocarbons (or CFCs) is responsible for an increased incidence of skin cancer, cataracts, impairment of human immune systems, and damage to wildlife. CFCs have been banned from production in the United States since 1995. Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCS) are potent ozone-depleting compounds. While less destructive than the now -banned chlorofluorocarbons, HCFC"s are targeted'for gradual` phaseout by the US EPA, with a total ban going into effect in the year 2030. According to US EPA, the depletion of the Earth's protective ozone layer is responsible for an increased incidence of skin cancer, cataracts, impairment of human immune systems, and damage to wildlife. BE CONTACT DONATE Formaldehyde is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the State of California as a known human carcinogen. Common health effects at low levels of exposure to this volatile organic cernpound include irritation and sensitization, and the conVound also acts as an asthma trigger. Long-term exposure is associated with nasal cancers and leukemia. •-RE.F:.htto://uvuvuucancergo�r/cartcertolaics/factsheet/riskLfnrmaldehyde MONOMERIC, AND POLYMERIC AND ORGANOPHOSPHATE HALOGENATED FLAME RETARDANTS (HFRS) Halogenated Fire Retardants (HFRs) are a broad class of flame retardants containing chlorine or bromine that have aroused concern due to their exponential accumulation in human beings in recent years. HFRs are persistent bioaccumulative toxins, meaning that they accumulate in organisms and the broader environment, often reaching alarmingly high concentrations as they travel up the food chain. In adc ition, certain halogenated -products have shown evidence of harm to humans and other animal species. According to the Washington State Department of Ecology, for example, the toxicity endpoints of concern for Penta-PBDE include adverse effects on neurological development, reproduction, thyroid -hormone disruption and possible liver toxicity. HFRs include PBDE, TBBPA, HBCD, Deca-BDE, TCPP, TCEP, Dechlorane Plus, and other retardants -with bromine t>r chlorine. Boren is rvat -an HF -R and allowed. Marty prod -acts, including virtually all foam insulations, contain HFRs. • REP. https: ecologywa.goy/Waste-To xics/Reducing-toxic- h micalslAddressing_priority-toxic- chemicats/PBDE -ORGANOTIN COMPOUNDS Organotin compounds are a class of substances containing a bond between tin and carbon. Organotin compounds are used in the production of PVC, silicone rubber, and polyurethane. Exposure can cause memory loss, eye irritation, and liver damage. Certain organotin compounds are neurotoxins and acute exposure can be lethal. Organotin compounds are persistent in the environn-tent and pose a threat toaquatic life at elevated concentrations. Animal studies have indicated organotin compounds might damage the immune and nervous systems. • REF:..Mips -ntp niehs n.ilz gov ntp/htdncs/nhem_backgroUnd/exsurxipdf/or ganntins 508 pdf PERFLUORINATED AND POLYFLUORINATED ALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) / PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS (PFCS) Perfluorinated and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances, also commonly referred to as PFAS, are synthetic manufactured fluorine -containing chemicals that exist in many forms with many uses in building and consumer products. Perfluorinated Compounds, or PFCs, are a subset of PFAS. Building -product applications cif PFAS include roofing materials, paints and coatings, sealants, caulks, adhesives, carpets, and more, providing highly desirable functions such as weatherproofing, corrosion prevention, lubrication, friction reduction, and grease and water resistance. -PFAS and PF -Cs are characterized by their carbon -fluorine bonds, which are some of the LOGIN contrmuzes to bioaccumuiation io ieveis mat we Know to oe potentially narmrui. in many cases, relatively safer non -fluorinated alternatives exist for these applications and many building product sectors are already making a transition to safer chemistries. • REF: httpsalwww.oecd.org/chemicalsafetyjportal-perfluorinated-chemicals) • REF: https://www.epa govche icaI-research resear -and-pol luoroaIkyl-substances-pfas • REF: http . fas-l.itrcweb.org[ • REF: http : fascentral.2rg[ PHTHALATES (ORTHOPHTALATES) Mounting evidence from animaLstudies.show the hormone -disrupting potential of.phthalates, primarily orthophthalates, prompting the National Research Council to urge the US Environmental Protection Agency to pursue a "cumulative risk assessment" of this class of chemicals to determine their interactivity. Testing by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that phthalates are nearly ubiquitous in the US population, with highest concentrations in women and in children aged 6 to 11 years. The endocrine disrupting nature of phthalates has implications for childhood and reproductive development, as well as cancer incidence: The European Union and -over a dozen countries have banned the use of phthalates in children's products, as has the State of California. REF (cumulative risk assessment): httl2://www8.nationalacademies.org onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordlDF12S2_8 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) PCB manufacturing in the united States stopped in 1977 butthe compound- is tong -lasting in the environment (mostly in soils) around old manufacturing and disposal sites, in old electrical transformers and electrical devices, and in fish and their predators. PCBs make good coolants, lubricants, and insulators for electrical equipment of all kinds. They are known to cause cancer in animals and are probable human carcinogens, but exposure tends to be limited to people who worked in the electrical industry many years ago, lived close to manufacturing sites, and/or ate contaminated fish. Health effects also include acne -like skin conditions and neurobehavioral and immunological changes in children. • REF: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/csem.as 2cs�po=1Q POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PANS) PAHs are a group of chemicals that are often produced by the incomplete combustion of flrga.n.ic material, particularly wood and fossil fuels. PAHs are commonly inhaled in tobacco smoke or smoke from indoor stoves fueled by wood or coal. They can also be ingested by eating burned meat. PAHs are also used to manufacture certain types of dyes. Exposure to PAHs is linked to lung, skin, and urinary cancer, and short-term exposure may cause vomiting and diarrhea. Almost every American has detectable levels of PAHs in their body. • REF: https://superfund.oregonstate.edu/aII-about-pahs operations and are also used, along with MCCPs, as secondary plasticizers and flame retardants in plastics, such as PVC. Human exposure can be occupational, via inhalation of metalworking mists, or through contaminated food and dermal contact. Environmental exposure is usually from manufacturing activities, such as production, disposal, incineration, spills into waterways, and sewage effluent_ SCCPs and MCCPs are persistent and very ibioaccumulative in sediment. They have been found in marine mammals, other biota, and human breast milk in both industrial and remote areas. Toxic effects on mammals can include liver, hormone, and kidney damage that over a long term could lead to cancer in those Organs. • REF: https:llwww.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca short-chai n - chlorinated -paraffins TOXIC HEAVY METALS Toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, chromium (V[), read (added), and mercury, pose a number of threats to health. Arsenic is a carcinogen and can cause developmental issues. The US Department of Health and Human Services and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have determined that cadmium, is a known human carcinogen associated with lung cancer. Additionally, acute and long-term exposures can lead to lung and kidney damage, bone loss, and hypertension. In sufficient quantities, cadmium is lethal. Cadmium's extreme toxicity means that overexposure can occur even when only trace amounts are -present, such as during smelting and electroplating activities. Chromium, primarily used in chrome plating materials, can cause breathing problems as well as. nasal and lung cancer. Although chromium is a naturally occurring element and chromium III (trivalent chrome) is an essential nutrient, chromium (VI) (hexavalent chrome) can cause serious health issues, especially for factory workers who can inhale or ingest it during manufacturing_ There has been concern about it in drinking water and, lacking EPA maximum allowable levels, the State of California set a public health goal for it. Chromium (VI) is used primarily for chrome plating of metals for decorative or protective finishes, making stainless steel, leather tanning, anti- corrosive agents for paints, and in textile dyes and pigments. Long-term or high-level exposure through inhalation can cause nasal irritation and ulcers, breathing problems, and nasal and lung cancer in unprotected workers.- Ingestion can cause anemia and/or stomach tumors. Skin. contact can cause skin ulcers and allergic reactions. -According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the environmental levels of lead have increased more than 1000 -fold over the last three centuries, due almost exclusively to human activities. Lead exposure is damaging to virtually every organ and system in the human body, but is particularly damaging to the brain and central nervous system—profoundly so for young children and developing fetuses. Lead exposure is correlated with decreased IQ and delayed learning in children; scientific research has identified no safe level of lead exposure, and effects are -irreversible. According to the World Health Organization, mercury produces a suite of ill effects, including harm to the nervous, digestive, and immune systems, and even death. WHO lists children and developing fetuses as especially vulnerable to damage from mercury. Mercury bioaccumul-ates in MEMBER ABOUT PROGRAMS COMMUNITY r•I i C�--NATE • PER https://wwwn.cdc.goy/TSP/PHS/PHS.aspx?phsid=18&toxid=3 • PER http://www.inchern.org/documents/iarcA(ol58/mono58-2.html • PER https:www.osha.gov/SLTC/hexavalentchromiuml • PER http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs379/en/ • PER http://www.epa gov hgieffects.htm VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS) IN WET APPLIED PRODUCTS VOCs are members of a large group of organic chemicals that can evaporate into the .indoor -air under normal temperature conditions and into the outdoor air, causing environmental impacts such as photochemical smog. Their health effects vary widely, from respiratory irritants to human carcinogens (such as formaldehyde), which is of concern since they are ingredients in many products in the built environment. On-site wet applied products (paints, adhesives, and sealants) are of particular concern because they can directly impact the health of installers who may not be using breathing or dermal protection, unlike in -factory wet applied materials that are (usually) applied with worker and environmental protections in place. Unlike other items that appear on the Red List, (VOCs) are not -banned -outright. Wet -applied products (including coatings, adhesives, and sealants) applied on site must meet the following established emissions and/or VOC content standards: "Wet -applied products (including coatings, adhesives, and sealants) applied on site must have VOC levels below the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1168 for Adhesives and Sealants or the CARB 2007 Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for Architectural Coatings, as applicable" WOOD TREATMENTS CONTAINING CREOSOTE OR PENTACHLOROPHENOL Many conventional wood treatments introduce a litany of human health and environmental problems. The traits that make wood treatments effective at retarding rot and insect damage are also effective at damaging many other forms of life. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, creosote exposure is associated with skin and scrotum cancer in humans, and liver, kidney; and gestational problems in laboratory animals. inorganic arsenic is not only an acute toxin; it is a known human carcinogen. Pentachlorophenol is linked to liver and immune system damage in humans, and reproductive and thyroid damage in laboratory animals. • PER (creosote): https-1/wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/PHS/PHS.aspx?phsid=64&toxid=18 • REF (pentachlorophenol): https://www.atsdr.cdc.govZphs phs.asp?id=400&tid=70 RED LIST AND WATCH LIST CASRN GUIDE i DOWN TH` GUI-_ PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF THE LBC RED LIST MEMBE HOM ABOUT RAM CONTACT M US F RIVACY N n June 28, 2023 Christian Diaz 7 Thousand Oaks Drive Brewster, MA 02631 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 brhealth(a Brewster -ma. ov W W W.BREW STER-MA. GOV RE: Notice of Noncompliance — Innovative/Alternative Sewage System 7 Thousand Oaks Drive, Brewster Dear Mr. Diaz: Health Department Amy L. von Hone, RS., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Certified Mail #7018 2290 0000 2350 3376 This office has learned that the Innovative/Alternative septic system installed at the above -referenced location does not have a current Operation and Maintenance contract. 310 CMR 15.287(9) of 310 CMR 15.000: The State Environmental Code, Title 5: Standard Requirements for the Siting, Construction, Inspection, Upgrade and Expansion of On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems and for the Transport and Disposal of Septage states: "The system owner shall maintain an operation and maintenance contract with a Massachusetts. Certified Operator where one is required by 257 CMR 2.00: Certification of Operators of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, or otherwise with a person qualified to operate and maintain the system in Accordance with the Department's written approval." Therefore, you are out of compliance with 310 CMR 15.000: The State Environmental Code, Title 5, and the Town of Brewster Local Regulation to supplement Title 5, State Environmental Code Monitoring of Innovative/Alternative On -Site Sewage Treatment Systems. To bring this Innovative/Alternative system into compliance, you must enter into a valid Operation and Maintenance contract with a qualified vendor within fifteen (15) days of receipt of this notice and provide written proof to the Brewster Health Department. A list of certified operators is attached for your convenience. You have the right to a hearing before the Board of Health to show cause why the Board should modify or withdraw this order. If you choose to exercise this right, you must do so, in writing, within seven (7) days of receipt of this letter. If you have any further questions or comments about this matter, please contact our office Monday through Friday, 8:30- 4:OOPM. Our telephone number is 508-896-3701 ext. 1120. Failure to comply with this Notice will result in further Board of Health action and/or legal action including monetary fines. Respectfully, Amy von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Health Director cc: Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment- Tracy Long Board of Health File Enclosure: I/A Contractor List N:\Health\IA Information\Enforcement Letters\7-9 Thousand Oaks Drive Noncompliance letter 06.28.23.doc n, \\\\,\ e W 4S - I< .1,�70jj.DER �Fi. 0 co 0. �188///, June 28, 2023 Nelson & Mericlith Wirtz 160 Old Red Top Road Brewster, MA 02631 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 brhealth�Lbrewster-rna.gov WWW.BREWSTER-MA.GOV RE: Notice of Noncompliance — Innovative/Alternative Sewage System 160 Old Red Top Road, Brewster Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wirtz: Health Departinent Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Certified Mail #7018 2290 0000 2350 3390 This office has learned that the Inn ovative/Alternative septic system installed at the a bove- referenced location does not have a current Operation and Maintenance contract. 310 CMR 15.287(9) of 310 CMR IS.000: The State Environmental Code, Title 5: Standard Requirements for the Siting, Construction, Inspection, Upgrade and Expansion of On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems and for the Transport and Disposal of Septage states: "The system owner shall maintain an operation and maintenance contract with a Massachusetts. Certified Operator where one is required by 257 CMR 2.00: Certification of Operators of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, or otherwise with a person qualified to operate and maintain the system in Accordance with the Department's written approval." Therefore, you are out of compliance with 310 CMR 15.000: The State Environmental Code, Title 5, and the Town of Brewster Local Regulation to supplement Title 5, State Environmental Code Monitoring of Innovative/Alternative On -Site Sewage Treatment Systems. To bring this Innovative/Alternative system into compliance, you must enter into a valid Operation and Maintenance contract with a qualified vendor within fifteen (115) days of receipt of this notice and provide written proof to the Brewster Health Department. A list of certified operators is attached for your convenience. You have the right to a hearing before the Board of Health to show cause why the Board should modify or withdraw this order. If you choose to exercise this right, you must do so, in writing, within seven (7) days of receipt of this letter. if you have any further questions or comments about this matter, please contact our office Monday through Friday, 8:30- 4:OOPM. Our telephone number is 508-896-3701 ext. 1120. Failure to comply with this Notice will result in further Board of Health action and/or legal action including monetary fines. Respectfully, Amy von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Health Director cc: Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment- Tracy Long Board of Health File Enclosure: I/A Contractor List N:\Flealth\IA Information\Enforcement Letters\1 60 Old Red Top Road Noncompliance letter 6.28.23.doc zzwwl I I I I I jlfll�#01/1 'o, A 0* 0, IL 0 `44 June 28, 2023 Mark & Dana Tully 4 Wood Lane Winchester, MA 01890 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 brhealth�, . -brewster-ma.mov WWW.BREWSTER-MA.GOV RE: Notice of Noncompliance — Innovative/Alternative Sewage System 300 Foster Road, Brewster Dear Mr. & Mrs. Tully: Health Department Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Certified Mail #7018 2290 0000 2350 3383 This office has learned that the Innovative/Alternative septic system installed at the above -referenced location does not have a current Operation and Maintenance contract. 310 CMR 15.287(9) of 310 CMR 15.000: The State Environmental Code, Title 5: Standard Requirements for the Siting, Construction, Inspection, Upgrade and Expansion of On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems and for the Transport and Disposal of Septage states: "The system owner shall maintain an operation and maintenance contract with a Massachusetts. Certified Operator where one is required by 257 CMR 2.00: Certification of Operators Of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, or otherwise with a person qualified to operate and maintain the system in Accordance with the Department's written approval." Therefore ' you are out of compliance with 310 CMR 15.000: The State Environmental Code, Title 5, and the Town of Brewster Local Regulation to supplement Title 5, State Environmental Code Monitoring of Innovative/Alternative On -Site Sewage Treatment Systems. To bring this Innovative/Alternative system into compliance, you must enter into a valid Operation and Maintenance contract with a qualified vendor within fifteen (15) days of receipt of this notice and provide written proof to the Brewster Health Department. A list of certified operators is attached for your convenience. You have the right to a hearing before the Board of Health to show cause why the Board should modify or withdraw this order. If you choose to exercise this right, you must do so, in writing, within seven (7) days of receipt of this letter. if you have any further questions or comments about this matter, please contact our office Monday through Friday, 8:30- 4:OOPM. Our telephone number is 508-896-3701 ext. 1120. Failure to comply with this Notice will result in further Board of Health action and/or legal action including monetary fines. Respectfully, Amy von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Health Director cc: Barnstable County Department of Health and Environment- Tracy Long Board of Health File Enclosure: I/A Contractor List N:\Health\IA Information\Enforcement Letters\300 Foster Road Noncompliance letter 6.28.23.doc Massachusetts opioid -related overdose deaths rose 2.5 percent in 2022 Black residents accounted for the largest increase in opioid overdose death rates BOSTON (June 22, 2023) — Opioid -related overdose deaths in Massachusetts increased by 2.5 percent in 2022 compared to 2021, with rates among Black, non - Hispanic residents making up the largest increase, according to preliminary data released today by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH). There were 2,357 confirmed and estimated opioid -related overdose deaths in 2022, surpassing the previous peak in 2021 by an estimated 57 deaths. Preliminary data also show there were 522 confirmed and estimated opioid -related overdose deaths in the first three months of 2023, a 7.7 percent decrease (an estimated 44 fewer deaths) from the same time period in 2022. Among non -Hispanic Black residents, the opioid -related overdose death rate increased by 42 percent, from 36.4 to 51.7 deaths per 100,000 residents from 2021 to 2022. When broken down by sex, the data show that non -Hispanic Black men had the highest opioid -related overdose death rate increase among males in all race/ethnicity groups, from 56.4 to 79.6 per 100,000 (a 41 percent increase). The rate for non - Hispanic Black women increased by 47 percent, from 17.4 to 25.5 per 100,000. The Healey -Driscoll Administration's opioid prevention efforts are focused on providing communities with the resources needed to support a wide range of substance use programs, including those centered on behavioral health and homelessness. The Administration's Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) budget proposes investments of more than $600 million for substance addiction prevention and treatment programs, including critical funding for expanding outpatient services, increasing access to crisis stabilization services in communities and emergency departments, and strengthening the continuum of care in inpatient settings. "As Attorney General, I made combatting the opioid crisis a top priority, and that commitment continues as Governor while we work to provide individuals and communities with the support they need for treatment, prevention and recovery," said Governor Maura Healey. "Too many Massachusetts families, particularly families of color, have been impacted by this crisis, and in order to effectively respond, we need to address the gaps in the system by advancing long-term solutions that include housing, jobs, mental health care and more resources for our cities and towns." "We know that the opioid crisis impacts communities across Massachusetts and requires a collaborative response between the state and municipalities," said Lieutenant Governor Kim Driscoll. "By investing in supports at the local level, including increasing access to crisis stabilization services in the community, we will be able to support people where they live, and where their families and communities can support them in their treatment." The Commonwealth continues to expand existing substance use disorder treatment and overdose prevention initiatives, including increasing access to the overdose - reversal drug naloxone. Massachusetts has already exceeded, and plans to expand upon, federal naloxone "saturation" goals, providing communities with enough naloxone to prevent overdose deaths that may occur from a lack of medication access. Since 2020, DPH has distributed nearly 300,000 naloxone kits to harm reduction programs, opioid treatment providers, community health centers, hospital emergency departments, and county houses of correction, with distribution increasing about 40 percent each year. DPH has increased its investment in naloxone by more than 140 percent in recent years, from $2.9 million in 2018 to $7 million in 2022. Through these investments, DPH launched the Community Naloxone Purchasing P_rogran in May 2022 to increase distribution of free naloxone through organizations to community members across Massachusetts. In response to the rise in opioid -related overdose deaths, DPH issued an advisory last month urging all providers to increase availability of naloxone kits and train staff to dispense and administer naloxone to anyone who may need it. Retail pharmacies in Massachusetts should continue to dispense naloxone without a prescription as part of a statewide standing order. Everyone, especially those around people at high risk for overdose, should carry and know how to use naloxone, which can prevent serious harm and death from overdose. Those at high risk include people taking high doses of prescription opioids, people misusing prescription opioids, and people using illicit opioids or other drugs, which can be contaminated with the powerful opioid fentanyl. "We understand that to address the opioid crisis, we need to prioritize overdose death prevention while simultaneously investing in comprehensive supports for those dealing with substance use disorder, to ensure they have every opportunity for recovery," said Secretary of Health and Human Services Kate Walsh. "We have to lean into the disparities we see in impacts on Black residents and target our interventions accordingly. Challenges like housing, hunger, and accessing education, behavioral health treatment and transportation need to be addressed in concert with substance use treatment in order to turn the tide of this epidemic." "The increase in opioid -related overdose deaths is a tragedy and alarming," said Department of Public Health Commissioner Robert Goldstein, MD, PhD. "We know overdose deaths are preventable. The pandemic has had a devastating impact on mental health and substance use, especially among marginalized communities. We are working to reverse these troubling trends by continuing to build on our data - driven and equity -based approaches toward responsive support and treatment." Key Points and Interventions: The opioid -related overdose death rate in Massachusetts increased to 33.5 per 100,000 people in 2022, 2.5 percent higher than in 2021 (32.7 per 100,000) and 9.1 percent higher than the pre -pandemic peak in 2016. Since August 2022, DPH has distributed about 275,000 rapid fentanyl test strip kits at no cost to providers and community organizations and plans to expand distribution in the coming year. Single -use fentanyl test strips help reduce the chances of overdose by allowing people who use drugs to test their supply prior to consumption to determine if it is tainted with fentanyl. Fentanyl was present at a rate of 93 percent of fatal opioid overdoses in 2022 where a toxicology report was available. Cocaine was present in 53 percent of toxicology reports, a 4 percent increase over 2021. Alcohol was present in 28 percent, benzodiazepines in 27 percent, prescription opioids in 11 percent, amphetamines in 9 percent, and heroin in 6 percent. Xylazine was present in 5 percent of opioid -related overdose deaths from June to December 2022 where a toxicology screening was available. 47 percent of all opioid -related overdose deaths were between 25 and 44 years old; 43 percent were between 45 and 64 years old. Males comprise 72 percent of all opioid -related overdose deaths in 2022. In the first three months of 2023, males aged 35-44 accounted for the greatest number of suspected opioid -related incidents with a known age and sex treated by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) at 19.4 percent. This marks a shift from prior years where the greatest number of incidents occurred among males aged 25-34. Naloxone was administered in 97 percent of acute opioid overdoses occurring in the first three months of 2023. Using federal funds, DPH continues to increase investment in 29 opioid addiction treatment programs across the Commonwealth to expand services aimed at reaching historically underserved or hard to reach populations, including those in the hardest-hit communities like Boston, Lawrence, Lynn, Springfield, and Worcester. DPH's ongoing investments in temporary and permanent low -threshold housing for homeless or housing unstable individuals struggling with substance use disorder have led to the placement of more than 400 people so far. Using funds from the state's Opioid Recovery and Remediation Fund, DPH expects to increase low -threshold housing units statewide from 394 to 761 and is on track to house more than 500 people by the end of FY24. • The largest overdose death increases in 2022 were seen in Worcester County (18 percent, from 281 to 331) and Plymouth County (14 percent, from 167 to 190). • The most rural communities had the highest opioid -related overdose death rate in 2022 at 36.1 deaths per 100,000 residents. • The following cities and towns experienced a notable decrease in opioid - related overdose deaths in 2022 compared with 2021: Gloucester, Haverhill, Norton, Salem, and Taunton. • The following cities and towns experienced a notable increase in opioid - related overdose deaths in 2022 compared with 2021: Lawrence, Leominster, Lynn, Springfield, Waltham, Weymouth, and Worcester. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection eDEP Transaction Copy. Here is the file you requested for your records. To retain a copy of this file you must save and/or print. Username: EBELAIR Transaction ID: 1576221 Document: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Size of File: 1026.72K Status of Transaction: submitted Date and Time Created: 6/26/2023:9:55:04 AM Note: This file only includes forms that were part of your transaction as of the date and time indicated above. If you need a more current copy of your transaction, return to eDEP and select to "Download a Copy" from the Current Submittals page. Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. raD Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT A. Facility Information 1. Facility name. address: SERENITY BREWSTER WWTF a. Name 873 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address BREWSTER MA C. City d. State 2. Contact information: MAHEEN AKHTER JEFF BOCCACIO a. Name of Facility Contact Person 6178526110 b. Telephone Number 3. Sampling information: [5/12/2023 a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) ,KRISTIN PHELAN c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 599 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number 12023 MAY MONTHLY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency 02631 e. Zip Code makhter@elevationfinancialgroup.com c. e-mail address RI ANALYTICALS b. laboratory Name 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Discharge Monitoring Report - 2023 May Monthly r All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. F This is the last selection. 3.- Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 LLI Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 599 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number'Groundwater Permit ^-- 2. Tax identification Number DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT 12023 MAY MONTHLY 3. SampliMonth & Frequency D. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled 1. Parameter/Contaminant 112 Units I12 _ t30D 14 MG/L TSS 2.5 MG/L TOTAL SOLIDS 370 MG/L AMMONIA -N 71 MG/L NITRATE -N MG/L TOTAL NITROGEN(NO3+NO2+TKN) MG/L OIL & GREASE MG/L 2. Influent 3. Effluent 4. Effluent Method Detection limit 1 18.0 2.6 0.53 0.050 2.2 !� 0.50 0.60 0.50 infeffrp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Discharge Monitoring Report • Page 1 of 1 112 I12 _ 4. Effluent Method Detection limit 1 18.0 2.6 0.53 0.050 2.2 !� 0.50 0.60 0.50 infeffrp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Discharge Monitoring Report • Page 1 of 1 Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. Lat A Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit DAILY LOG SHEET A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: SERENITY BREWSTER WWTF a. Name X599 J 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number 2023 MAY DAILY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency 873 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address BRE` WSTER JMA 02631 C. City d. State e. Zip Code 2. Contact information: MAHEEN AKHTER JEFF BOCCACIO a. Name of Facility Contact Person 6178526110 b. Telephone Number 3. Sampling information: makhter@elevationfinancialgroup.com c. e-mail address 15/31/2023 WH ITEWATER a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) b. Laboratory Name RICK BRULOTTE c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Daily Log Sheet - 2023 May Daily r— All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. r- This is the last selection. 3. r Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc - rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection [59 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number DAILY LOG SHEET J.?023 MAY DAILY j 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Daily Readings/Analysis Information Date Effluent Reuse Irrigation Turbidity Influent pH Effluent Chlorine Uv Flow GPD Flow GPD Flow GPD pH Residual Intensity (mg/1) (%) 1 8992 I 6.8 0.8 T 2 8044 f l 6.8 0.8 3 8067 `� 6.8 .0. 8 4 7343 J .6.8 0.8 5 7616 6.6 i 0.8 67303 F=i I I 7 7196 i �J 8 8057 0.8 918058 i �� 6.7 0.8 10 ` 7499 7.1 0.7 11 8848 �� 7.5 0.6 12 7739 7.5 0.6 13 822 14 8211 15 18137 7.1 0.6 16 6874A� �� 7.2 0.6 0.8 17 7831 7.1 18 5441 7 1 19 5187 7.1 0.8 20 I530� 21 5874 22 6866 I 7 1 23 6816 I 7 0.8 24 7036 1 7.1 ` 0.8 25 8210 26 27 7944 f i 28 7778 29 7970 30 6773 6.9 �� 0.8 31 7771 f 7 6.9 0.7 gdpols.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Im portant: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. !A6 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: SERENITY BREWSTER WWTF a. Name X873 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address BREWSTER C. City 2. Contact information: MAHEEN AKHTER JEFF BOCCACIO 599 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identlification Number [2023 MAY MONTHLY 1 3. Sampling Month & Frequency MA 02631 d. State e. Zip Code a. Name of Facility Contact Person 6178526110 makhter@elevationfinancialgroup.com b. Telephone Number c. e-mail address 3. Sampling information: 15/8/2023 WHITEWATER a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) b. Laboratory Name RICK 13RULOTTE c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency I Monitoring Well Data Report - 2023 May Monthly — All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. r This is the last selection. 3. r Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1599 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number �. Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT - 2023 MAY MONTHLY J 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" < • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled • DRY = Not enough water in well to sample. Parameter/Contaminant MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 Units Well #: 1 Well #: 2 Well #: 3 Well #: 4 Well #: 5 Well #: 6 PH 5.9 6.3 16 6.9 S.U. STATIC WATER LEVEL 58.9 57.2 160.5 64 FEET SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE 200 315 212 615 UMHOS/C mwdgwp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Monitoring Well Data for Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 599 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number ` Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number Facility Information Important:When SERENITY BREWSTER WWTF filling out forms on a. Name the computer, use - — only the tab key to 873 HARWICH ROAD move your cursor - b. Street Address do not use the IBREWSTER MA 02631 return key. C. City d. State e. Zip Code Certification "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the !l11 information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that ther - are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." ELIZABETH BELAIR 16/2312023 Any person signing a. Signature b. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) a document under 314 CMR 5.14(1) or (2) shall make the R_ eporting Package Comments following FACILITY WAS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MONTH. certification If you are filing electronic -ally and want to attach additional comments, select the check box. r— gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � eDEP Transaction Copy Here is the file you requested for your records. To retain a copy of this file you must save and/or print. Username: SFARRENKOPF Transaction ID: 1580974 Document: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Size of File: 1030.06K Status of Transaction: In Process Date and Time Created: 6115/2023:3:36:52 PM Note: This file only includes forms that were part of your transaction as of the date and time indicated above. If you need a more current copy of your transaction, return to eDEP and select to "Download a Copy" from the Current Submittals page. Ll lmportant:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit DAILY LOG SHEET A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: IMAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER a. Name 820 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address BREWSTER MA C. City d. State 2. Contact information: JOSEPH SMITH a. Name of Facility Contact Person 7742125005 b. Telephone Number 3. Sampling information: 15/1/2023 a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) BEA/NSU WWTO PERSONNEL c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 951 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number 2023 MAY DAILY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency 02631 e. Zip Code jsmith@nsuwater.com c. e-mail address NOT APPLICABLE b. Laboratory Name 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Daily Log Sheet - 2023 May Daily (— All forms for submittal have been completed. 2.- This is the last selection. 3. r Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 951 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number DAILY LOG SHEET 12023 MAY DAILY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Daily Readings/Analysis Information Effluent Flow GPD 6349 6103 5201 6090 5350 5350 5206 5384 6162 7081 5265 6227 ,6533 6319 16289 6289 6289 Reuse Irrigation Flow GPD Flow GPD Turbidity Influent pH Effluent Chlorine Uv pH Residual Intensity (mg/1) N 6.9 ,68 7.1 7.0 I 7.0 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.0 7.1 7.0 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.0 7.0 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.1 gdpols.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Ll Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER a. Name 820 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address JBREWSTER C. City 2. Contact information: JOSEPH SMITH a. Name of Facility Contact Person 7742125005 b. Telephone Number 95� 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number X2023 MAY MONTHLY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency MA X02631 d. State e. Zip Code ljsmith@nsuwater.com c. e-mail address 3. Sampling information: 5/3/2023 ALPHA ANALYTICAL a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) b. Laboratory Name ALPHA ANALYTICAL PERSONNEL c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Discharge Monitoring Report - 2023 May Monthly r All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. r This is the last selection. 3. r Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection9 1 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (2023 MAY MONTHLY S. Sampling Month & Frequency D. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled 1. Parameter/Contaminant 2. Influent Units BOD 90 MG/L TSS 11_0 MG/L TOTAL SOLIDS 350 MG/L AMMONIA -N 115.7 MG/L NITRATE -N MG/L TOTAL NITROGEN(NO3+NO2+TKN) MG/L OIL & GREASE MG/L 3. Effluent 19.3 18.7 4. Effluent Method Detection limit '2.0 5.0 4.3 1.0.10 5.04 1 0.450 [ND � �3.6_ _ infeffrp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Discharge Monitoring Report • Page 1 of 1 U Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: ,MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER a. Name 820 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address BREWSTER C. City 2. Contact information: JOSEPH SMITH a. Name of Facility Contact Person 7742125005 b. Telephone Number 3. Sampling information: X5/5/2023 a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) BEA/NSU WWTO PERSONNEL c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 1951 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number 12023 MAY MONTHLY _ 3. Sampling Month & Frequency MA 02631 d. State e. Zip Code jsmith@nsuwater.com c. e-mail address NOT APPLICABLE b. Laboratory Name 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Monitoring Well Data Report - 2023 May Monthly r All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. This is the last selection. 3. r- Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 --Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection I951 _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number LL7,'! Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT 2023 MAY MONTHLY -- 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" < • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled • DRY = Not enough water in well to sample. Parameter/Contaminant MW -1 MW -2 MW -3 MW -4 Units Well #: 1 Well #: 2 Well #: 3 Well #: 4 Well #: 5 Well #: 6 PH 6.70 15.80 16.78 5.81 S.U. STATIC WATER LEVEL 34.71 33.86 33.89 I33.87 FEET SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE 87.6 236.1 501 102.7 UMHOS/C mwdgwp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Monitoring Well Data for Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. r� Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit Facility Information MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER a. Name 820 HARWICH ROAD b. Street Address BREWSTER C. City 951 _ 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number MA 02631 d. State e. Zip Code Certification "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that ther - are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations" SAMANTHA FARRENKOPF 16/15/2023 Any person signing a document under 314 CMR 5.14(1) or (2) shall make the following certification If you are filing electronic -ally and want to attach additional comments, select the check box. r a. Signature Reporting__Packaze Comments b. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) ,BENNETT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, LLC. (BEA) HAS COMPLETED THE MAY 2023 MONTHLY INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT SAMPLING OF THE BIOCLERE WASTEWATER 'TREATMENT SYSTEM. MONTHLY WASTEWATER SAMPLING WAS COMPLETED ON 5/3/23. LABORATORY RESULTS REPORTED ALL PARAMETERS WITHIN DISCHARGE PERMIT LIMITS. EFFLUENT PH WAS REPORTED WITHIN THE 6.5-8.5 RANGE THROUGHOUT THE MONTH. FLOW VOLUME MEASUREMENTS WERE ASSESSED DURING THE MONTH FROM THE SYSTEM'S EFFLUENT FLOW METER. DAILY FLOW REMAINED WITHIN THE 19,800 -GPD LIMITATION THROUGHOUT THE MONTH. THE MINIMUM, MAXIMUM AND AVERAGE GPD FLOWS REPORTED OVER THE COURSE OF THE MONTH WERE 4,804 GPD, 9,347 GPD AND 6,191 GPD, RESPECTIVELY gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 At C A L ANALYTICAL REPORT Lab Number L2324252 Client: Bennett Environmental Associates 1573 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 ATTN: Samantha Farrenkopf Phone: (508) 896-1706 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 Serial No:05172319:04 The original project report/data package is held by Alpha Analytical. This report/data package is paginated and should be reproduced only in its entirety. Alpha Analytical holds no responsibility for results and/or data that are not consistent with the original. Certifications & Approvals: MA (M-MA086), NH NELAP (2064), CT (PH -0826), IL (200077), IN (C -MA -03), KY (KY98045), ME (MA00086), MD (348), NJ (MA935), NY (11148), NC (25700/666), OH (CL108), OR (MA -1316), PA (68-03671), RI (LA000065), TX (T104704476), VT (VT -0935), VA (460195), USDA (Permit #525-23-122-91930). Eight Walkup Drive, Westborough, MA 01581-1019 508-898-9220 (Fax) 508-898-9193 800-624-9220 - www.alphalab.com Page 1 of 18 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Number: L2324252 Report Date: 05/17/23 Alpha Sample Collection Sample ID Client ID Matrix Location Date/Time Receive Date L2324252-01 INFLUENT WATER BREWSTER, MA 05/03/2311:00 05/03/23 L2324252-02 EFFLUENT WATER BREWSTER, MA 05/03/23 11:30 05/03/23 Page 2 of 18 FItia Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 Case Narrative The samples were received in accordance with the Chain of Custody and no significant deviations were encountered during the preparation or analysis unless otherwise noted. Sample Receipt, Container Information, and the Chain of Custody are located at the back of the report. Results contained within this report relate only to the samples submitted under this Alpha Lab Number and meet NELAP requirements for all NELAP accredited parameters unless otherwise noted in the following narrative. The data presented in this report is organized by parameter (i.e. VOC, SVOC, etc.). Sample specific Quality Control data (i.e. Surrogate Spike Recovery) is reported at the end of the target analyte list for each individual sample, followed by the Laboratory Batch Quality Control at the end of each parameter. Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs), if requested, are reported for compounds identified to be present and are not part of the method/program Target Compound List, even if only a subset of the TCL are being reported. If a sample was re -analyzed or re -extracted due to a required quality control corrective action and if both sets of data are reported, the Laboratory ID of the re -analysis or re -extraction is designated with an "R" or "RE", respectively. When multiple Batch Quality Control elements are reported (e.g. more than one LCS), the associated samples for each element are noted in the grey shaded header line of each data table. Any Laboratory Batch, Sample Specific % recovery or RPD value that is outside the listed Acceptance Criteria is bolded in the report. In reference to questions H (CAM) or 4 (RCP) when "NO" is checked, the performance criteria for CAM and RCP methods allow for some quality control failures to occur and still be within method compliance. In these instances, the specific failure is not narrated but noted in the associated QC Outlier Summary Report, located directly after the Case Narrative. QC information is also incorporated in the Data Usability Assessment table (Format 11) of our Data Merger tool, where it can be reviewed in conjunction with the sample result, associated regulatory criteria and any associated data usability implications. Soil/sediments, solids and tissues are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Definitions of all data qualifiers and acronyms used in this report are provided in the Glossary located at the back of the report. HOLD POLICY - For samples submitted on hold, Alpha's policy is to hold samples (with the exception of Air canisters) free of charge for 21 calendar days from the date the project is completed. After 21 calendar days, we will dispose of all samples submitted including those put on hold unless you have contacted your Alpha Project Manager and made arrangements for Alpha to continue to hold the samples. Air canisters will be disposed after 3 business days from the date the project is completed. Please contact Project Management at 800-624-9220 with any questions. I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained in this analytical report, such information is accurate and complete. This certificate of analysis is not complete unless this page accompanies any and all pages of this report. Tiffani Morrissey Authorized Signature: Title: Technical Director/Representative Page 3 of 18 Date: 05/17/23 INORGANICS 0 MISCELLANEOUS Page 4 of 18 Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Lab ID: L2324252-01 Dilution Client ID: INFLUENT Analytical Sample Location: BREWSTER, MA MDL Sample Depth: Prepared Analyzed Matrix: Water 13 Parameter Result Qualifier Units General Chemistry - Westborough Lab 121,25406 Solids, Total 350 mg/I Solids, Total Suspended 110 mg/I Nitrogen, Ammonia 15.7 mg/l BOD, 5 day 90 mg/l Page 5 of 18 SAMPLE RESULTS Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Number: L2324252 Report Date: 05/17/23 Date Collected: 05/03/23 11:00 Date Received: 05/03/23 Field Prep: Not Specified L HA Dilution Date Date Analytical RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst 13 NA 1.3 05/05/23 04:03 121,25406 DEW 20 NA 4 - 05/09/2310:07 121,2540D CVN 0.750 -- 10 05/09/2314:40 05/10/2315:13121,4500NH3-BH KEP 30 NA 15 05/04/2316:15 05/09/2310:45 121,52106 MKT L HA Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2324252-02 Date Collected: 05/03/23 11:30 Client ID: EFFLUENT Date Received: 05/03/23 Sample Location: BREWSTER, MA Field Prep: Not Specified Sample Depth: Matrix: Water Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Solids, Total Suspended 8.7 mg/l 5.0 NA 1 - 05/09/23 10:07 121,2540D CVN Nitrogen, Ammonia 0.112 mg/l 0.075 1 05/09/23 14:40 05/10/23 15:14 121,4500NH3-BH KEP Nitrogen, Nitrite 0.14 mg/I 0.050 1 05/04/23 05:57 44,353.2 KAF Nitrogen, Nitrate 4.3 mg/l 0.10 — 1 - 05/04/23 05:57 44,353.2 KAF Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 0.602 mg/l 0.300 1 05/13/23 16:30 05/15/23 21:20 121,4500NH3-H AVT BOD, 5 day 9.3 mg/l 2.0 NA 1 05/04/23 16:15 05/09/23 10:45 121,521013 MKT Oil & Grease, Hem-Grav ND mg/l 3.6 .9 05/17/23 13:16 05/17/23 17:31 140,1664B QJM Page 6 of 18 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Number: L2324252 Report Date: 05/17/23 Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst General Chemistry -Westborough Lab for sample(s): 02 Batch: WG1774487-1 Nitrogen, Nitrite ND mg/I 0.050 -- 1 05/04/23 03:15 44,353.2 KAF General Chemistry - Westborough Lab for sample(s): 02 Batch: WG1774491-1 Nitrogen, Nitrate ND mg/I 0.10 -- 1 - 05/04/23 03:23 44,353.2 KAF General Chemistry - Westborough Lab for sample(s): 01-02 Batch: WG1774835-1 BOD, 5 day ND mg/I 2.0 NA 1 05/04/23 16:15 05/09/23 10:45 121,5210B MKT General Chemistry - Westborough Lab for sample(s): 01 Batch: WG1775014-1 Solids, Total ND mg/I 10 NA 1 - 05/05/23 04:03 121,2540B DEW General Chemistry - Westborough Lab for sample(s): 01-02 Batch: WG1776637-1 Solids, Total Suspended ND mg/I 5.0 NA 1 - 05/09/23 10:07 121,2540D CVN General Chemistry - Westborough Lab for sample(s): 01-02 Batch: WG1776664-1 Nitrogen, Ammonia ND mg/I 0.075 1 05/09/23 14:40 05/10/23 14:40 121,4500NH3-BH KEP General Chemistry -Westborough Lab for sample(s): 02 Batch: WG1778524-1 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl ND mg/I 0.300 1 05/13/23 16:30 05/15/23 21:16 121,4500NH3-H AVT General Chemistry - Westborough Lab for sample(s): 02 Batch: WG 1780094-1 oil & Grease, Hem-Grav ND mg/I 4.0 1 05/17/23 13:16 05/17/23 15:58 140,1664B QJM Page 7 of 18 Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Control Sample Analysis Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter '%Recovery Qual %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual RPD Limits General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 Batch: WG1774487-2 Nitrogen, Nitrite ?6 90-110 20 General Chemistry -Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 Batch: WG1774491-2 Nitrogen, Nitrate ')t� - 90-110 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 Batch: WG1774835-2 BOD, 5 day ']2 - 85-115 20 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01 Batch: WG1775014-2 Solids, Total 100 80-120 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 Batch: WG 1776637-2 Solids, Total Suspended 80-120 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 Batch: WG1776664-2 Nitrogen, Ammonia 94 - 80-120 20 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 Batch: WG 1778524-2 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl - 78-122 Page 8 of 18 Project Name: Project Number: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER K10842 DA. S. W W.700 Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control Lab Number: Report Date: L2324252 05/17/23 LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 Batch: WG1780094-2 Oil & Grease, Hem-Grav Page 9 of 18 78-114 18 Serial No:05172319:04 Matrix Spike Analysis Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 Native MS MS MS MSD MSD Recovery RPD Parameter Sample Added Found %Recovery Qual Found %Recovery Qual Limits RPD Qual Limits General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1774487-4 QC Sample: L2324215-07 Client ID: MS Sample Nitrogen, Nitrite ND 4 4.3 108 80-120 20 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1774491-4 QC Sample: L2324215-07 Client ID: MS Sample Nitrogen, Nitrate 3.7 4 7.5 83-113 6 General Chemistry -Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 QC Batch ID: WG1774835-4 QC Sample: L2324252-02 Client ID: EFFLUENT BOD, 5 day 9.3 100 97 88 50-145 35 General Chemistry -Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 QC Batch ID: WG1776664-4 QC Sample: L2325188-02 Client ID: MS Sample Nitrogen, Ammonia 0.270 4 3.64 _ 80-120 20 General Chemistry -Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1778524-4 QC Sample: L2324145-01 Client ID: MS Sample Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 0.760 8 7.95 s.r; 77-111 24 General Chemistry -Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1780094-4 QC Sample: L2324091-02 Client ID: MS Sample Oil & Grease, Hem-Grav ND 37.7 22 59 Q 78-114 18 Page 10 of 18 ''` Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Lab Duplicate Analysis Batch Quality Control Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Number: L2324252 Report Date: 05/17/23 Parameter Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units RPD Qual RPD Limits General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1774487-3 QC Sample: L2324215-07 Client ID: DUP Sample Nitrogen, Nitrite ND ND mg/l NC 20 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1774491-3 QC Sample: L2324215-07 Client ID: DUP Sample Nitrogen, Nitrate 3.7 3.7 mg/I " 6 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 QC Batch ID: WG1774835-3 QC Sample: L2324252-02 Client ID: EFFLUENT BOD, 5 day 9.3 8.7 mg/I - 35 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01 QC Batch ID: WG1775014-3 QC Sample: L2323794-01 Client ID: DUP Sample Solids, Total 880 910 mg/I -Z 16 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 QC Batch ID: WG1776637-3 QC Sample: L2324252-01 Client ID: INFLUENT Solids, Total Suspended 110 100 mg/l 10 32 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 QC Batch ID: WG1776637-4 QC Sample: L2324256-01 Client ID: DUP Sample Solids, Total Suspended 530 600 mg/l 32 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 01-02 QC Batch ID: WG1776664-3 QC Sample: L2325188-02 Client ID: DUP Sample Nitrogen, Ammonia 0.270 0.302 mg/I 11 20 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1778524-3 QC Sample: L2324145-01 Client ID: DUP Sample Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 0.760 0.767 mg/l 24 General Chemistry - Westborough Lab Associated sample(s): 02 QC Batch ID: WG1780094-3 QC Sample: L2324090-02 Client ID: DUP Sample Oil & Grease, Hem-Grav ND ND mg/l NC 18 Page 11 of 18 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Were project specific reporting limits specified? Cooler Information Cooler Custody Seal A Absent B Absent Sample Receipt and Container Information YES Serial No:05172319:04 Lab Number. L2324252 Report Date: 05/17/23 Container Information Initial Final Temp Frozen Container ID Container Type Cooler pH pH deg C Pres Seal Date/Time Analysis(*) L2324252 -01A Plastic 500ml H2SO4 preserved B <2 <2 3.1 Y Absent NH3-4500(28) L2324252-01 B Plastic 950m] unpreserved B 7 7 3.1 Y Absent TSC -2540(7), BOD -5210(2) L2324252 -01C Plastic 950ml unpreserved B 7 7 3.1 Y Absent TSS -2540(7) L2324252 -02A Plastic 500ml H2SO4 preserved A <2 <2 3.8 Y Absent TKN-4500(28),NH3-4500(28) L2324252 -02B Plastic 950ml unpreserved A 7 7 3.8 Y Absent NO2-353(2),BOD-5210(2),NO3-353(2) L2324252 -02C Plastic 950ml unpreserved A 7 7 3.8 Y Absent TSS -2540(7) L2324252 -02D Amber 1000ml HCI preserved A NA 3.8 Y Absent OG -1664(28) L2324252 -02E Amber 1000ml HCl preserved A NA 3.8 Y Absent OG -1664(28) Page 12 of 18 *Values in parentheses indicate holding time in days �� :.,�;� Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 GLOSSARY Acronyms DL Detection Limit: This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values, when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the limit of quantitation (LOQ). The DL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. (DoD report formats only.) EDL Estimated Detection Limit: This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values, when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the reporting limit (RL). The EDL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. The use of EDLs is specific to the analysis of PAHs using Solid -Phase Microextraction (SPME). EMPC Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration: The concentration that results from the signal present at the retention time of an analyte when the ions meet all of the identification criteria except the ion abundance ratio criteria. An EMPC is a worst-case estimate of the concentration. EPA Environmental Protection Agency. LCS Laboratory Control Sample: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate: Refer to LCS. LF13 Laboratory Fortified Blank: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. LOD Limit of Detection: This value represents the level to which a target analyte can reliably be detected for a specific analyte in a specific matrix by a specific method. The LOD includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. (DoD report formats only.) LOQ Limit of Quantitation: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a specific concentration. The LOQ includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. (DoD report formats only.) Limit of Quantitation: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a specific concentration. The LOQ includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. (DoD report formats only.) MDL Method Detection Limit: This value represents the level to which target analyte concentrations are reported as estimated values, when those target analyte concentrations are quantified below the reporting limit (RL). The MDL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. MS Matrix Spike Sample: A sample prepared by adding a known mass of target analyte to a specified amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target analyte concentration is available. For Method 332.0, the spike recovery is calculated using the native concentration, including estimated values. MSD Matrix Spike Sample Duplicate: Refer to MS. NA Not Applicable. NC Not Calculated: Term is utilized when one or more of the results utilized in the calculation are non -detect at the parameter's reporting unit. NDPA/DPA - N-Nitrosodipheny]amine/Diphenylamine. NI Not Ignitable. NP Non -Plastic: Term is utilized for the analysis of Atterberg Limits in soil. NR No Results: Term is utilized when'No Target Compounds Requested' is reported for the analysis of Volatile or Semivolatile Organic TIC only requests. RL Reporting Limit: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a specific concentration. The RL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. RPD Relative Percent Difference: The results from matrix and/or matrix spike duplicates are primarily designed to assess the precision of analytical results in a given matrix and are expressed as relative percent difference (RPD). Values which are less than five times the reporting limit for any individual parameter are evaluated by utilizing the absolute difference between the values; although the RPD value will be provided in the report. SRM Standard Reference Material: A reference sample of a known or certified value that is of the same or similar matrix as the associated field samples. STLP Semi -dynamic Tank Leaching Procedure per EPA Method 1315. TEF Toxic Equivalency Factors: The values assigned to each dioxin and furan to evaluate their toxicity relative to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. TEQ Toxic Equivalent: The measure of a sample's toxicity derived by multiplying each dioxin and furan by its corresponding TEF and then summing the resulting values. TIC Tentatively Identified Compound: A compound that has been identified to be present and is not part of the target compound list (TCL) for the method and/or program. All TICS are qualitatively identified and reported as estimated concentrations. Report Format. Data Usability Report Page 13 of 18 Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 Footnotes 1 The reference for this analyte should be considered modified since this analyte is absent from the target analyte list of the original method. Terms Analytical Method: Both the document from which the method originates and the analytical reference method. (Example: EPA 8260B is shown as 1,8260B.) The codes for the reference method documents are provided in the References section ofthe Addendum. Chlordane: The target compound Chlordane (CAS No. 57-74-9) is reported for GC ECD analyses. Per EPA,this compound "refers to a mixture of chlordane isomers, other chlorinated hydrocarbons and numerous other components." (Reference: USEPA Toxicological Review of Chlordane, In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), December 1997.) Difference: With respect to Total Oxidizable Precursor (TOP) Assay analysis, the difference is defined as the Post -Treatment value minus the Pre -Treatment value. Final pH: As it pertains to Sample Receipt & Container Information section of the report, Final pH reflects pH of container determined after adjustment at the laboratory, if applicable. If no adjustment required, value reflects Initial pH. Frozen Date/Time: With respect to Volatile Organics in soil, Frozen Date/Time reflects the date/time at which associated Reagent Water - preserved vials were initially frozen. Note: If frozen date/time is beyond 48 hours from sample collection, value will be reflected in'bold'. Gasoline Range Organics (GRO): Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) results include all chromatographic peaks eluting from Methyl tert butyl ether through Naphthalene, with the exception of GRO analysis in support of State of Ohio programs, which includes all chromatographic peaks eluting from Hexane through Dodecane. Initial pH: As it pertains to Sample Receipt & Container Information section of the report, Initial pH reflects pH of container determined upon receipt, if applicable. PAH Total: With respect to Alkylated PAH analyses, the 'PAHs, Total' result is defined as the summation of results for all or a subset of the following compounds: Naphthalene, C1-C4 Naphthalenes, 2 -Methylnaphthalene, 1 -Methylnaphthalene, Biphenyl, Acenaphthylene, Acenaphthene, Fluorene, C1-C3 Fluorenes, Phenanthrene, C1-C4 Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes, Anthracene, Fluoranthene, Pyrene, C1-C4 Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes, Benz(a)anthracene, Chrysene, C1-C4 Chrysenes, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzoo)+(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(e)pyrene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Perylene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Dibenz(ah)+(ac)anthracene, Benzo(g,h,i)perylene. If a'Total' result is requested, the results of its individual components will also be reported. PFAS Total: With respect to PFAS analyses, the'PFAS, Total (5)' result is defined as the summation of results for: PFHpA, PFHxS, PFOA, PFNA and PFOS. In addition, the'PFAS, Total (6)' result is defined as the summation of results for: PFHpA, PFHxS, PFOA, PFNA, PFDA and PFOS. For MassDEP DW compliance analysis only, the'PFAS, Total (6)' result is defined as the summation of results at or above the RL. Note: If a'Total' result is requested, the results of its individual components will also be reported. Total: With respect to Organic analyses, a'Total' result is defined as the summation of results for individual isomers or Aroclors. If a'Total' result is requested, the results of its individual components will also be reported. This is applicable to'Total' results for methods 8260, 8081 and 8082. Data Qualifiers A - Spectra identified as "Aldol Condensates" are byproducts of the extraction/concentration procedures when acetone is introduced in the process. B -The analyte was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank. Flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times (10x) the concentration found in the blank. For MCP -related projects, flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times (10x) the concentration found in the blank. For DOD -related projects, flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte at less than ten times (10x) the concentration found in the blank AND the analyte was detected above one-half the reporting limit (or above the reporting limit for common lab contaminants) in the associated method blank. For NJ - Air -related projects, flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte above the reporting limit. For NJ -related projects (excluding Air), flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte, which was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank or above five times the reporting limit for common lab contaminants (Phthalates, Acetone, Methylene Chloride, 2-Butanone). C Co -elution: The target analyte co -elutes with a known lab standard (i.e. surrogate, internal standards, etc.) for co -extracted analyses. D Concentration of analyte was quantified from diluted analysis. Flag only applies to field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte. E Concentration of analyte exceeds the range of the calibration curve and/or linear range of the instrument. F The ratio of quantifier ion response to qualifier ion response falls outside of the laboratory criteria. Results are considered to be an estimated maximum concentration. G -The concentration may be biased high due to matrix interferences (i.e, co elution) with non -target compound(s). The result should be considered estimated. H - The analysis of pH was performed beyond the regulatory -required holding time of 15 minutes from the time of sample collection. I -The lower value for the two columns has been reported due to obvious interference. J Estimated value. This represents an estimated concentration for Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICS). M Reporting Limit (RL) exceeds the MCP CAM Reporting Limit for this analyte. Report Format: Data Usability Report &A Page 14 of 18 Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 Data Qualifiers ND Not detected at the reporting limit (RL) for the sample. NJ Presumptive evidence of compound. This represents an estimated concentration for Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs), where the identification is based on a mass spectral library search. P The RPD between the results for the two columns exceeds the method -specified criteria. Q The quality control sample exceeds the associated acceptance criteria. For DOD -related projects, LCS and/or Continuing Calibration Standard exceedences are also qualified on all associated sample results. Note: This flag is not applicable for matrix spike recoveries when the sample concentration is greater than 4x the spike added or for batch duplicate RPD when the sample concentrations are less than 5x the RL. (Metals only.) R Analytical results are from sample re -analysis. RE Analytical results are from sample re -extraction. S Analytical results are from modified screening analysis. V -The surrogate associated with this target analyte has a recovery outside the QC acceptance limits. (Applicable to MassDEP DW Compliance samples only.) Z - The batch matrix spike and/or duplicate associated with this target analyte has a recovery/RPD outside the QC acceptance limits. (Applicable to MassDEP DW Compliance samples only.) Report Format., Data Usability Report &A Page 15 of 18 Serial No:05172319:04 Project Name: MAPLEWOOD AT BREWSTER Lab Number: L2324252 Project Number: K10842DA.S.WW.700 Report Date: 05/17/23 REFERENCES 44 Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, EPA/600/R-93/100, August 1993. 121 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA-AWWA-WEF Standard Methods Online. 140 Method 1664,Revision B: N -Hexane Extractable Material (HEM; Oil & Grease) and Silica Gel Treated N -Hexane Extractable Material (SGT -HEM; Non -polar Material) by Extraction and Gravimetry, EPA -821-R-10-001, February 2010. LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES Alpha Analytical performs services with reasonable care and diligence normal to the analytical testing laboratory industry. In the event of an error, the sole and exclusive responsibility of Alpha Analytical shall be to re -perform the work at it's own expense. In no event shall Alpha Analytical be held liable for any incidental, consequential or special damages, including but not limited to, damages in any way connected with the use of, interpretation of, information or analysis provided by Alpha Analytical. We strongly urge our clients to comply with EPA protocol regarding sample volume, preservation, cooling, containers, sampling procedures, holding time and splitting of samples in the field. Page 16 of 18 Serial_No:05172319:04 Alpha Analytical, Inc. ID No.:17873 Facility: Company -wide Revision 19 Department: Quality Assurance Published Date: 4/2/2021 1:14:23 PM Title: Certificate/ApRroval Program Summary Pace 1 of 1 Certification Information The following analytes are not included in our Primary NELAP Scope of Accreditation: Westborough Facility EPA 624/624.1: m/p-xylene, o -xylene, Naphthalene EPA 625/625.1: alpha -Terpineol EPA 8260C/826OD: NPW: 1,2,4,5 -Tetra methyl benzene; 4-Ethyltoluene, Azobenzene; SCM: lodomethane (methyl iodide), 1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene; 4-Ethyltoluene. . EPA 8270D/8270E: NPW: Dimethylnaphthalene,1,4-Diphenylhydrazine, alpha -Terpineol; SCM: Dimethylnaphthalene,1,4-Diphenylhydrazine. SM4500: NPW: Amenable Cyanide; SCM: Total Phosphorus, TKN, NO2, NO3. Mansfield Facility SM 254OD: TSS EPA 8082A: NPW: PCB: 1, 5, 31, 87,101, 110, 141, 151, 153, 180, 183, 187. EPA TO -15: Halothane, 2,4,4-Trimethyl-2-pentene, 2,4,4-Trimethyl-1-pentene, Thiophene, 2-Methylthiophene, 3-Methylthiophene, 2-Ethylthiophene, 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene, Indan, Indene, 1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene, Benzothiophene, 1 -Methylnaphthalene. Biological Tissue Matrix: EPA 30508 The following analytes are included in our Massachusetts DEP Scope of Accreditation Westborough Facility: Drinking Water EPA 300.0: Chloride, Nitrate -N, Fluoride, Sulfate; EPA 353.2: Nitrate -N, Nitrite -N; SM4500NO3-F: Nitrate -N, Nitrite -N; SM4500F-C, SM4500CN-CE, EPA 180.1, SM2130B, SM4500CI-0, SM2320B, SM2540C, SM4500H-B, SM450ONO2-B EPA 332: Perchlorate; EPA 524.2: THMs and VOCs; EPA 504.1: EDB, DBCP. Microbiology: SM9215B; SM9223-P/A, SM9223B-Colilert-QT,SM9222D. Non -Potable Water SM4500H,B, EPA 120.1, SM2510B, SM2540C, SM2320B, SM4500CL-E, SM4500F-BC, SM4500NH3-BH: Ammonia -N and Kjeldahl -N, EPA 350.1: Ammonia -N, LACHAT 10-107-06-1-B: Ammonia -N, EPA 351.1, SM4500NO3-F, EPA 353.2: Nitrate -N, SM4500P-E, SM4500P-B, E, SM4500SO4-E, SM5220D, EPA 410.4, SM5210B, SM5310C, SM4500CL-D, EPA 1664, EPA 420.1, SM4500-CN-CE, SM2540D, EPA 300: Chloride, Sulfate, Nitrate. EPA 624.1: Volatile Halocarbons & Aromatics, EPA 608.3: Chlordane, Toxaphene, Aldrin, alpha -BHC, beta -BHC, gamma -BHC, delta -BHC, Dieldrin, DDD, DDE, DDT, Endosulfan I, Endosulfan II, Endosulfan sulfate, Endrin, Endrin Aldehyde, Heptachlor, Heptachlor Epoxide, PCBs EPA 625.1: SVOC (Acid/Base/Neutral Extractables), EPA 600/4-81-045: PCB -Oil. Microbiology: SM9223B-Colilert-QT; Enterolert-QT, SM9221E, EPA 1600, EPA 1603, SM9222D. Mansfield Facility: Drinking Water EPA 200.7: Al, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Na, Ag, Ca, Zn. EPA 200.8: Al, Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Ag, TL, Zn. EPA 245.1 Hg. EPA 522, EPA 537.1. Non -Potable Water EPA 200.7: Al, Sb, As, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, K, Se, Ag, Na, Sr, TL, Ti, V, Zn. EPA 200.8: Al, Sb, As, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Ni, K, Se, Ag, Na, TL, Zn. EPA 245.1 Hg. SM2340B For a complete listing of analytes and methods, please contact your Alpha Project Manager. Document Type: Form Page 17 of 18 Pre-Qualtrax Document ID: 08-113 CHAIN OF CUSTODY PNW r Qlf t L] LP�-; A Wulbormigh, *A Manan . *A TEL 50618.9= 7EL 5054=-93W Ghent: Bennett Environ Addtesg. 1573 Maln St Project Mame. Maplewood at Brewster Projct Location. Bramter, MAI n— .-# *� 4e1 nna-3nA C ULAM Tnn 6U M Serial No:05172319:04 Dolle Redd In talo l 3 j� ALPHA Job * L r� �f +� J��- 6. Roport Information Data Deliverables Billing Information E] FAX ® EMAIL 1 ❑ S rn,,. Ilea Wb 70 *: K10842DA.S ADF-K ® Awj De1N►9rawes Phone: SW8,96-1746 Time ANALYSIS •-----------L-TuZn-Aroun-d Fox 508496-5409 ® Stand✓ard RUSK JONLYW ME-APPR01EDr PLE NDt ING Von Email. sf8rrelwopMNSUWaler.com — t7 bms ❑ rn.,rw %*m** imus been Pravrausiy analyte by JAN" clue Date. Time: 2 IW n..d.d 0 l.ab to do Pt*.. Other Project Specific Requirements/CwmentWOolection Lirtlitsr Q pled. z ALPMA Lab ID i Sample in Cogecdon Sample. Sampler's. Pb Use 0*) Osler Tirtrew 1aErix, inillpls lLl GCY Q a.man.em. Commem.nb )influent WN i ❑ a ■ Effhont S' ww ® ® ® ❑ Li Li ❑ 4 LF .CIEl ❑ ❑ ❑ El EET El 10 El L[ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El r❑�yI❑ I_J 01 I Ll 010101 ❑ ❑ 1711010 01 0{ ® ❑ El E111010 0 ❑ n [:jEi® ❑ e- ContainarType P P P P A P P PreserV8i;lhl@ 'p p d Pisw� pr5nt tAe.ty, f@gr1T.y andooenpW.Fj. Smmpkseen 1*wunWww- 4 1E Q A - nd Rallrpua had W Dolefrime RwAved By- Dslelfilme )urn a WmQWd cla*wO not "+ '- m sae tswtosd. Aa sample T I 06,E - 3 submMled an subjW to Ayah.l's P.gmair Terms. + d,.<.,� x 3 r a� fT' '" -- Page 18 of 18 1I'