Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutTBP 2013-05-15 2009 Code Adoption with Amendments It's time again for the town to update our current building codes. Every three years the International Code Council publishes a new series of updated building codes with changes and additions reflecting new building technologies, better and more reliable building systems and increased energy efficiency, all with the intent of constructing safer and more comfortable buildings that our citizens and guests occupy. There are several reasons we feel now is the time to update our building code to the 2009 family of codes. First, to maintain our Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule with the Insurance Services Office, Inc. ISO is the leading supplier of statistical data, underwriting information and actuarial analysis to the property/casualty insurance industry in the United States. Insurers can use the BCEGS classification number to offer insurance premium discounts to eligible properties in our town. Failure to adopt a newer code would result in our BCEGS classification number to be lowered, possibly resulting in higher insurance costs locally. Also, maintaining consistency with the Grand County Building Department and the codes they enforce will provide for a seamless transition for designers and contractors whether they develop with-in town limits or in the unincorporated areas of the county. The International Codes proposed for adoption include the: • International Residential Code • International Building Code • International Plumbing Code • International Mechanical Code • International Fuel Gas Code • International Fire Code • International Energy Conservation Code There are no significant changes in the newer codes that we propose to adopt that would change the way we build locally except one: The International Residential Code is a comprehensive, stand-alone residential construction code addressing the design and construction of one-and-two family dwellings and townhouses.The 2009 IRC has included in its requirements that all one-and-two family dwellings and townhouses be protected with residential automatic fire sprinkler systems. In an effort to remain consistent with Grand County's Building Department we propose to amend International Residential Code Section R313.2 (one-and-two family dwellings automatic fire systems) by deleting this section in its entirety. International Residential Code Section R313.1 (townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems)would remain as is and after adoption of this code automatic fire sprinkler systems would be required in all townhouses. Townhouse: A single-family dwelling unit constructed in a group of three or more attached units in which each unit extends from foundation to roof and with a yard or public way on at least two sides. So, the question is: Do we require automatic fire sprinkler systems in all new one-and-two family dwellings and townhouses? Do we require automatic fire sprinkler systems in just new townhouses? Do we continue as in the past and not require automatic fire sprinkler systems for one-and-two family dwellings and townhouses? TOWN OF FRASER on 4-8-13 ORDINANCE NO. ??? SERIES 2013 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2009 EDITION INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2009 EDITION INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, 2009 EDITION INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, 2009 EDITION INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE, 2009 EDITION INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE INCLUDING APPENDICES, 2009 EDITION NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 2011 EDITION AND MAKING CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: PART 1: AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 18 of the Fraser Municipal Code,Town of Fraser, Colorado (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") is hereby amended as follows: ARTICLE 1 Building and Fire Codes Sec. 18-1-10 Adoption. (a) Pursuant to Title 31, Article 16, Parts 1, Colorado Revised Statutes, the following codes are hereby adopted and enacted by reference: (1) International Building Code, 2009 edition, with amendments as provided herein; (2) International Residential Code, 2009 edition, with amendments as provided herein; (3) International Plumbing Code, 2009 edition,with amendments as provided herein; (4) International Mechanical Code, 2009 edition, with amendments as provided herein; (5) International Fuel Gas Code, 2009 edition, with amendments as provided herein; (6) International Fire Code, 2009 edition, including all Appendices, with amendments as provided herein; and (7) National Electrical Code, 2011 Edition. (b) Said codes have been promulgated and published by the International Code Council, 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 6th Floor,Washington, DC 20001-2070, except for the National Electrical Code,which is published by the National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. Sec. 18-1-20 Copies on File. (a) Not less than one (1) copy of each of said codes hereby adopted, including amendments provided herein, all certified by the Mayor and the Town Clerk to be true copies of said codes and amendments as they were adopted by this Article, shall be kept on file in the office of the Town Clerk and available for public inspection; provided, however, that a copy of each code as amended may be kept in the office of the chief enforcement officer designated pursuant to such codes instead of the office of the Town Clerk. (b) The Town Clerk shall maintain a reasonable supply of copies of said codes and amendments adopted herein for purchase by the public at a reasonable price as established from time to time by the Town Clerk. Sec. 18-1-30 Amendments. (a) Preface to amendments. WPM;stricken in this fashion indicate code language that has been removed from the published codes. Bold, capitalized WORDS indicate language added to the published codes. Bold, Capitalized and lower case =Code Section or Table Titles Normal, Capitalized and lower case= Existing Code language StF41(ethF ugl: = Language deleted from the Code. BOLD,ALL CAPITALIZED = Language added to Code AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE Sec. 18-1-30. Code Amendments. (a) The following sections of the International Building Code, adopted by reference in Section 18-1- 10 above, is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section 101.1 is amended to read as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Building Code of THE TOWN OF FRASER, herein after referred to as "this Code." (2) Section 101.4.3 is amended to read as follow: 101.4.3 Plumbing. The provisions of the International Plumbing Code shall apply to the installation, alterations, repairs and replacement of plumbing systems, including equipment, appliances, fixtures, fittings and appurtenances, and where connected to a water system or sewage system and all aspects of a medical gas system. The pFevisieRS of the heteAQ644.QR64 ,DF.4,644t2 C^v.,Gye llispe Gi/e4e shall -, plY to pFivate sewage dispesal systems. (3) Section 101.4.4 is amended by deleting it in its entirety. (4) Section 102.6 is amended to read as follows: 102.6 Existing structures. The legal occupancy of any structure existing on the date of adoption of this Code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as is specifically covered in this Code, th et, P.RG&iepGi oreperty G^462 or the International Fire Code, or as is deemed necessary by the building official for the general safety and welfare of the occupants and the public. (5) Section 103.2 is amended to read as follows: 103.2 BUILDING OFFICIAL. The building official shall be appeiRted by the r-ti;^f ^;RtiRg auth^.;+.,of the uris,l;e+;ep. IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO ENFORCE ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE; HOWEVER,A GUARANTEE THAT ALL BUILDING AND STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. (6) Section 103.3 is amended to read as follows: 103.3 Deputies. In accordance with the prescribed procedures of this jurisdiction, amore eeReuFFeRee ^f the appe'RtiRg auth^.;+., the building official shall have the authority to appoint a deputy building official, the related technical officers, inspectors, plan examiners and other employees. Such employees shall have powers as delegated by the building official. Per the (7) Section 104.1 is amended to read as follows: 104.1 General. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO ENFORCE ALL OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE; HOWEVER,A GUARANTEE THAT ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of this Code. The building official shall have the authority to render interpretations of this Code and to adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies and procedures shall be in compliance with the intent and purpose of this Code. Such policies and procedures shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in this Code. (8) Section 104.8 is amended to read as follows: 104.8 Liability. THE ADOPTION OF THIS CODE,AND ANY PREVIOUS BUILDING CODES ADOPTED BY THE TOWN OF FRASER, SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO GIVE RISE TO A DUTY OF CARE ON THE PART OF ANY PUBLIC ENTITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT, NOR SHALL THIS CODE OR ANY PREVIOUS BUILDING CODES BE DEEMED TO CREATE ANY CIVIL REMEDY AGAINST A PUBLIC ENTITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT. The building official, member of board of appeals or employee charged with enforcement of the code, while acting for the jurisdiction in good faith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by this Code or other pertinent law or ordinance, shall not thereby be rendered liable personally and is hereby relieved from personal liability for any damages accruing to persons or property as a result of any act or by reason of an act or omission in the discharge of official duties. Any suit instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officer or employee in the lawful discharge of duties under the provisions of this Code shall be defended by a legal representative of the jurisdiction until the final termination of the proceedings. The building official or any subordinate shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit or proceeding that is instituted in pursuance of the provisions of This Code. (9) Sections 105.1.1 and 105.1.2 are hereby repealed in their entirety. 1-0-54-2 ARR-61al peFFAi% FeGQFd6. The per-se—As te- v.;hem @R @RRual per-o4qit shall keep a d ted (10) Section 105.2 is amended to read as follows: 105.2 Work exempt from permit. Exemptions from permit requirements of this Code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this Code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. Permits shall not be required for the following: Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided that the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet (11 m2). 2. Fences not over 6 feet(1,829 mm) high. 3. Oil derricks. 4. Retaining walls which are not over 4 feet(1,219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II or IIIA liquids. 5. Water tanks supported directly on grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,925 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2:1. 6. base... eRt„ ter, be! ,..,PLATFORMS,WALKS AND DRIVEWAYS AT GRADE and are not part of an accessible route. 7. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish work. 8. Temporary motion picture,television and theater stage sets and scenery. 9. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R-3 occupancy, which are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep, do not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,925 L) and are installed entirely above ground. 10. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes, not including service systems. 11. Swings and other playground equipment accessory to one- and two-family dwellings. 12. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm)from the exterior wall and do not require additional support of Groups R-3 and U occupancies. 13. Nonfixed and movable fixtures, cases, racks, counters and partitions not over 5 feet, 9 inches (1,753 mm) in height. (11) Section 105.5 is amended to read as follows: 105.5 Expiration. EVERY PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UNDER THE PROVISION OF THIS CODE SHALL EXPIRE 24 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUE. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. The building official is authorized to grant, in writing, one 9F RqeFeextension of time, for A period-9 OF not more than 180 days eac4. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. (12) Section 107.1 is amended by adding new subsections 107.2.1.1 and 107.2.1.2, to read as follows: 107.2.1.1 PROOF OF WATER AND SEWER. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT OF AN APPROVED WATER AND SEWER UTILITY PLAN WHICH MAY INCLUDE PAYING THE REQUIRED WATER AND SEWER TAP FEES. 107.2.1.2 EMERGENCY SERVICES IMPACT FEE. A DEVELOPER REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REQUIRING ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY SERVICES SHALL PAY THE IMPACT FEE TO THE EMERGENCY SERVICES PROVIDER PRIOR TO ANY ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE TOWN. SEE SECTION 18-6-30 (13) Section 107.3 is amended by adding a new subsection 107.3.1.1 to read as follows: 107.3.1.1 REQUIRED APPROVALS. THE APPLICATION AND DOCUMENTS FOR A PERMIT SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN ORDINANCES. (14) Section 107.3.3 is amended to read as follows: 107.3.3 Phased approval. The building official SHALL NOT ISSUE A PERMIT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. +ti^.;i^,1 to ;ss 61 e a perR4.4 f^.+ti^ .,,^+;^., of fA--A Ph;tiAAs will be gF@Rted. (15) Section 108.3 is repealed in its entirety. (16) Section 109.2 is amended to read as follows: 109.2 Schedule of permit fees. On buildings, structures, °'^ , gas, mechanical and plumbing systems or alterations requiring a permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required in accordance with the -se-he d„'^ ^-stah-li-shed by the plie,"'^ ^ utheFi+.. APPENDICES B AND C OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (17) Section 109.5 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 109.5.1 USE TAX REQUIREMENTS. SEE SECTION 4-3-20. (18) Section 109 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 109.7 REINSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE, IN THE AMOUNT PER 4PPENDIX B OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE, MAY BE ASSESSED FOR EACH INSPECTION OR REINSPECTION WHEN SUCH PORTION OF WORK FOR WHICH INSPECTION IS CALLED IS NOT COMPLETE OR WHEN CORRECTIONS CALLED FOR ARE NOT MADE. REINSPECTION FEES MAY BE ASSESSED WHEN THE INSPECTION RECORD CARD IS NOT POSTED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE ON THE WORK SITE,THE APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR, FOR FAILING TO PROVIDE ACCESS ON THE DATE FOR WHICH THE INSPECTION IS REQUESTED, OR DEVIATING FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. IN INSTANCES WHERE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN ASSESSED, NO ADDITIONAL INSPECTION OF THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. (19) Section 110.5 is amended to read as follows: 110.5 Inspection requests. 4-shall be the duty of the held,-.of the build;Rg p R,:, eF the;. duly 4ed by This Cede. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERSON DOING THE WORK,THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR TO KNOW THAT THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAS A VALID PERMIT AND TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN WORK IS READY FOR INSPECTION. UPON CONVICTION,A FINE WILL BE ASSESSED TO THE PERSON DOING THE WORK,THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, OR SUBCONTRACTOR IF WORK IS BEING DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT AND THE INSPECTION IS NOT REQUESTED PER SECTION 110. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERSON DOING THE WORK,THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR REQUESTING ANY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE TO PROVIDE ACCESS AND MEANS FOR INSPECTION OF SUCH WORK. ALL INSPECTIONS REQUESTED PRIOR TO 10:00 A.M.WILL BE PERFORMED THE SAME WORKING DAY. SUCH REQUEST FOR INSPECTION MAY BE IN WRITING OR BY CALLING THE 24- HOUR AUTOMATED TELEPHONE ANSWERING SYSTEM. (20) Section 111.1 is amended to read as follows: 111.1 Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made, until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as provided herein. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this Code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Exception: 1. Certificates of occupancy are not required for work exempt from permits under Section 105.2. 2. GROUP U OCCUPANCY. (21) Section 113 is repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows: 113: CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS 113.1 BOARD ESTABLISHED. PURSUANT TO SECTION 113,CHAPTER 1, OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND SECTION 108 OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, THERE IS HEREBY CREATED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 4 A CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS,WHICH BOARD SHALL BE COMPOSED OF FIVE (5) MEMBERS WHO SHALL DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF ALTERNATE MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION,AND TO PROVIDE FOR REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2009 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, 2009 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE,2009 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE,AND UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS. 113.2 MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS. A. THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL CONSIST OF FIVE (5) MEMBERS,THREE (3) OF WHICH ARE QUALIFIED BY EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING TO PASS UPON MATTERS PERTAINING TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL WHEN PERTAINING TO FIRE CODE ISSUES SHALL BE AN EX OFFICIO MEMBER AND SHALL ACT AS SECRETARY OF THE BOARD. THE BOARD SHALL BE APPOINTED AND THEIR TERMS OF OFFICE SET BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS AND THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD FOR THE FIRE CODE BOARD, WHICH TERMS SHALL BE OF SUCH LENGTH AND SO ARRANGED THAT THE TERMS OF AT LEAST ONE MEMBER WILL EXPIRE EACH YEAR. B. ANY MEMBER OF THE BOARD MAY BE REMOVED,AFTER PUBLIC HEARING, BY THE MAYOR FOR INEFFICIENCY, NEGLECT OF DUTY OF MALFEASANCE IN OFFICE. THE MAYOR SHALL FILE A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR SUCH REMOVAL. C. VACANCIES OCCURRING OTHERWISE AND THROUGH THE EXPIRATION OF A TERM SHALL BE FILLED FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE UNEXPIRED TERM. 113.3 ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES. THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL ELECT ITS CHAIRPERSON FROM AMONG THE MEMBERS APPOINTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES,AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD,AND CREATE AND FILL SUCH OTHER OF IT OFFICES AS IT MAY DETERMINE. THE TERM OF THE CHAIRPERSON SHALL BE ONE YEAR WITH ELIGIBILITY FOR REELECTION. THE BOARD WILL HOLD MEETINGS WHEN CALLED BY THE CHAIRPERSON OR BUILDING OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL TRANSACT BUSINESS ACCORDING TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED HEREIN,AND SHALL MAKE FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON EACH CASE CONSIDERED. SUCH FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS SHALL BECOME A PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL BE KEPT IN THE OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK OR THE FIRE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR, RESPECTIVELY. 113.4 RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE FOLLOWING RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE ADOPTED FOR PURPOSES OF TRANSACTING THE BUSINESS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS: A. THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL MEET AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR WHEN REQUESTED BY THE BUILDING OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. B. THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL BE ELECTED BY A MAJORITY OF THE ENTIRE REGULAR MEMBERSHIP AT THE FIRST MEETING OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR,TO SERVE FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR. A VICE CHAIRPERSON SHALL BE ELECTED IN THE SAME MANNER AT THE SAME TIME FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR. C. THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL PRESIDE AT ALL MEETINGS,SHALL CONDUCT ALL HEARINGS AND SHALL EXERCISE AND PERFORM SUCH OTHER POWERS AND DUTIES AS MAY BE FROM TIME TO TIME ASSIGNED TO HIM BY THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS, OR AS PRESCRIBED BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS HEREIN. IN PRESIDING AT MEETINGS AND HEARINGS,THE CHAIRPERSON SHALL RULE ON PROCEDURE AND ON ORDER OF PRESENTATION. D. THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL BE THE JUDGE OF THE QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONS APPEARING AS EXPERT WITNESSES,AND SHALL BE EMPOWERED TO REFUSE TO RECEIVE THE TESTIMONY OF ANY PURPORTED EXPERT NOT SO QUALIFIED. E. IN THE ABSENCE OR THE DISABILITY OF THE CHAIRPERSON,THE VICE CHAIRPERSON SHALL PERFORM ALL THE DUTIES OF THE CHAIRPERSON,AND WHEN SO ACTING SHALL HAVE ALL THE POWERS OF,AND BE SUBJECT TO ALL RESTRICTIONS UPON,THE CHAIRPERSON. F. IN THE ABSENCE OF BOTH THE CHAIRPERSON AND THE VICE CHAIRPERSON,A CHAIRPERSON PRO TEMPORE SHALL BE ELECTED,AMONG THOSE REGULAR MEMBERS PRESENT, BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF ALL THE MEMBERS PRESENT. G. SHOULD ANY MEMBER HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF ANY FACT WHICH MAY CONSTITUTE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN HIS CONSIDERATION OF ANY APPEAL, HE SHALL FORTHWITH NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL OF SAID FACTS. H. THE SECRETARY SHALL KEEP, OR CAUSE TO BE KEPT, MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS,AND SHALL PREPARE AN AGENDA FOR EACH MEETING, WHICH SHALL BE FURNISHED TO MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL HOUR OF THE MEETING. THE SECRETARY SHALL, IN ADDITION, BE CUSTODIAN OF THE RECORDS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS AND SHALL, UPON THE FILING OF AN APPEAL, FURNISH EACH REGULAR MEMBER WITH A COPY OF THE LETTER OF APPEAL. I. APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR APPLICABLE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL BE DIRECTED TO A SPECIFIC DECISION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR APPLICABLE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, AND CONSIDERATION OF SAID APPEAL BY THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS SHALL BE LIMITED TO SAID SPECIFIC DECISION. J. APPEALS WILL BE HEARD AT SPECIAL MEETINGS CALLED PURSUANT TO THE PRESIDING OFFICER OR BY A MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS. REQUESTS FOR HEARINGS MUST BE SCHEDULED AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH HEARING. K. IF A PARTY OF AN APPEAL INTENDS TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE,OR A LEGAL ARGUMENT, OUTSIDE OF THE EXPERTISE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS,SAID PARTY SHALL SO INFORM THE SECRETARY OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS IN WRITING AT THE TIME OF THE FILING OF THE APPEAL. FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE CAUSE FOR THE PROHIBITION OF THE PRESENTATION OF SUCH EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT. L. THE DECISION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS ON AN APPEAL SHALL BE FINAL. M. A DECISION SHALL REQUIRE A MAJORITY VOTE OF THOSE MEMBERS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS PRESENT; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THERE MUST BE A QUORUM OF AT LEAST THREE (3) MEMBERS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS PRIOR TO TRANSACTING ANY BUSINESS. N. A NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FEE OF$250.00. (22) Section 202 is amended by adding the following definitions within the alphabetical order of the existing definitions: ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE ON THE SAME LOT WITH THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HOUSING THE PRINCIPAL USE, BUT HOUSING A USE CUSTOMARILY INCIDENTAL AND SUBORDINATE TO THE PRINCIPAL USE. BEDROOM. A ROOM WHICH IS DESIGNED AS A SLEEPING ROOM,A LOFT,A MEZZANINE IN GROUP R OCCUPANCIES OR A ROOM OR AREA THAT CAN BE USED AS A SLEEPING ROOM AND CONTAINS A CLOSET. DWELLING UNIT,ACCESSORY. ONE (1) OR MORE ROOMS IN A DWELLING DESIGNED FOR OCCUPANCY BY ONE (1) FAMILY FOR LIVING PURPOSES, INCIDENTAL AND SUBORDINATE IN SIZE AND CHARACTER TO THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE AND HAVING NOT MORE THAN ONE(1) KITCHEN. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND CONTAINING AT LEAST TWO HUNDRED(200) SQUARE FEET OF HABITABLE FLOOR AREA. rT�b�2 t+6ai61rF-14 E2 KOm--gruvr un�6 the aveFage height of the highest reef surface. BUILDING HEIGHT. THE VERTICAL DISTANCE ABOVE A REFERENCE DATUM MEASURED TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE STRUCTURE. THE REFERENCE DATUM SHALL BE SELECTED BY EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING,WHICHEVER YIELDS A GREATER HEIGHT OF BUILDING: A.THE ELEVATION OF THE HIGHEST ADJOINING SIDEWALK OR GROUND SURFACE WITHIN A FIVE-FOOT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING WHEN SUCH SIDEWALK OR GROUND SURFACE IS NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET ABOVE LOWEST GRADE. B. AN ELEVATION FIVE (5) FEET HIGHER THAN THE LOWEST GRADE WHEN THE SIDEWALK OR GROUND SURFACE DESCRIBED IN SUBPARAGRAPH A. ABOVE IS MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET ABOVE THE LOWEST GRADE. C.THE HEIGHT OF A STEPPED OR TERRACED BUILDING IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ANY SEGMENT OF THE BUILDING. FIRE DEPARTMENT. THE CHIEF OFFICER OF EAST GRAND, GRANBY, GRAND LAKE, HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS AND KREMMLING FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. KITCHEN. A ROOM OR AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED TO BE USED FOR THE PREPARATION OF FOOD, WHICH CONTAINS MORE THAN ONE STANDARD SIZE KITCHEN APPLIANCE OR FIXTURE. UNUSEABLE CRAWLSPACES. THE AREA UNDER THE FIRST STORY FLOOR SYSTEM WHICH HAS LESS THAN FIVE (5) FEET OF HEAD ROOM AND AN UNFINISHED FLOOR. (23) Section 311.2 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 311.2.1 GROUP S-1, MINI STORAGE. BUILDINGS USED FOR MINI STORAGE SHALL BE COMPARTMENTALIZED BY NOT LESS THAN ONE-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION AT EACH FLOORANDCEILING AND AT EACH ONE THOUSAND (1,000) SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA. (24) Section 717.2.5 is amended to read as follows: 717.2.5 Ceiling and floor openings. Where required by Exception 6 of Section 708.2, Exception 1 of Section 713.4.1.2, or Section 713.4.2, fireblocking of the annular space around vents, pipes, ducts ehimReys and fireplaces at ceilings and floor levels shall be installed with a material specifically tested in the form and manner intended for use to demonstrate its ability to remain in place and resist the free passage of flame and the products of combustion. (25) Section 717.2.5.1 is amended to read as follows: 717.2.5.1 Factory built chimneys and fireplaces. PaeteFy built ehiRqReys @Rd Fireplaces shall be fireblocked in accordance with UL 103 and UL 127. FACTORY-BUILT CHIMNEYS SHALL BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A CONTINUOUS ENCLOSURE PROTECTED ON THE INTERIOR (CHIMNEY) SIDE BY NOT LESS THAN 5/8-INCH TYPE-X GYPSUM WALLBOARD. JOINTS AND FASTENERS SHALL BE TAPED AND FINISHED. EXCEPTION: THE PORTION OF THE CHIMNEY LOCATED IN THE SAME ROOM AS THE APPLIANCE AND THE PORTION OF THE CHIMNEY ABOVE THE FINISHED ROOF IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED. FACTORY-BUILT CHIMNEYS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY FIREBLOCKED WITHIN SUCH ENCLOSURE AT EACH FLOOR AND CEILING LEVEL AND AT THE ROOF. THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN ADJACENT FIREBLOCKING SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN (10) FEET. (26) Section 901.5 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 901.5.1 Special inspector required. ALL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL BE AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. APPROVALS OF SPECIAL INSPECTORS AND INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS AND REPORTS BY SPECIAL INSPECTORS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 17 OF THIS CODE. (27) Section 901.6 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 901.6.4 KEY BOX. WHERE A SUPERVISORY STATION IS REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION AND WHERE ACCESS TO OR WITHIN A STRUCTURE OR AREA IS RESTRICTED BECAUSE OF SECURED OPENINGS OR WHERE IMMEDIATE ACCESS IS NECESSARY FOR LIFE-SAVING OR FIRE-FIGHTING PURPOSES AS DETERMINED BY THE FIRE CHIEF,AN APPROVED RAPID ENTRY KEY LOCK BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED. 901.6.4.1 DEVICES. KEY LOCK BOXES SHALL BE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES-CERTIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE CHIEF. 901.6.4.2 LOCATION. THE KEY LOCK BOX SHALL BE LOCATED AT OR NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING, MOUNTED AT A HEIGHT OF SIX (6) FEET ABOVE FINAL GRADE AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE CHIEF. 901.6.4.3 KEY BOX CONTENTS. THE KEY BOX SHALL CONTAIN LABELED KEYS TO PROVIDE ACCESS INTO THE BUILDING. (28) Section 902.1 is amended by adding the following definition within the alphabetical order of the existing definitions. [F] FIRE DEPARTMENT. THE CHIEF OFFICER OF EAST GRAND, GRANBY, GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, GRAND LAKE, HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS AND KREMMLING FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. (29) Section 1009 is amended to read as follows: 1009.4.5 Profile. The radius of curvature at the leading edge of the tread shall be not greater than 9/16 inch (14.3 mm). Beveling of nosings shall not exceed 9/16 inch (14.3 mm). Risers shall be seliel apel vertical or sloped under the tread above from the underside of the nosing above at an angle not more than 30 degrees (0.52 rad) from the vertical. The leading edge (nosings) of treads shall project not more than 11/4 inches (32 mm) beyond the tread below, and all projections of the leading edges shall be of uniform size, including the leading edge of the floor at the top of a flight. Exceptions: 1 Solid risers are not required for stairways that are not required to comply with Section 1007.3, r ;ded that the epeRiRg ti„+,.,ee., treads , ees Ret p .,. it the passage of 2 Solid risers are not required for occupancies in Group 1-3 or in Group F, H and S occupancies other than areas accessible to the public. There are no restrictions on the size of the opening in the riser. 3 Solid risers are not required for spiral stairways constructed in accordance with Section 1009.9. 4 Solid risers are not required for alternating tread devices constructed in accordance with Section 1009.10. (30) Section 1208.2 is amended to read as follows: 1208.2 Minimum ceiling heights. Occupiable spaces, habitable spaces,a-F4 corridors AND UNFINISHED BASEMENTS shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet, 6 inches (2,286 mm). Bathrooms, toilet rooms, kitchens, storage rooms and laundry rooms shall be permitted to have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet (2,134 mm). Exceptions: 1 In one-and two-family dwellings, beams or girders spaced not less 4 feet (1,219 mm) on center and projecting not more than 6 inches (152 mm) below the required ceiling height. 2 If any room in a building has a sloped ceiling, the prescribed ceiling height for the room is required in one-half the area thereof. Any portion of the room measuring less than 5 feet(1,524 mm) from the finished floor to the finished ceiling shall not be included in any computation of the minimum area thereof. 3 Mezzanines constructed in accordance with Section 505.1. (31) Section 1503 is amended by adding three new subsections as follows: 1503.7 SNOW-SHED BARRIERS. ROOFS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT ACCUMULATION OF SNOW FROM SHEDDING ONTO EXTERIOR BALCONIES, DECKS AND PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR EXITS FROM BUILDINGS, STAIRWAYS, SIDEWALKS, STREETS,ALLEYS, AREAS DIRECTLY ABOVE OR IN FRONT OF GAS UTILITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY METERS, OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES. EXCEPTION: MECHANICAL BARRIERS INSTALLED TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING FROM THE ROOF WHICH ARE SECURED TO THE ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS OR TO SOLID BLOCKING SECURED TO FRAMING MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 1503.8 FALL PROTECTION. PERMANENT FALL PROTECTION ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION. ROOF ANCHORS OR SIMILAR DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS' INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 1503.9 VALLEY OUTLETS. EACH ROOF VALLEY SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE ELECTRICAL CODE. (32) Section 1507.1 is amended by adding two new subsections to read as follows: 1507.1.1 Ice barrier. AN ICE BARRIER THAT CONSISTS OF AN APPROVED SELF-ADHERING POLYMER MODIFIED BITUMEN SHEET SHALL BE USED IN LIEU OF NORMAL UNDERLAYMENT ON ALL SLOPED ROOFS. THIS ICE DAM PROTECTION UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE EAVES TO A POINT 6 FEET INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE OF THE BUILDING AND 24 INCHES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF ALL VALLEYS, FULLY ADHERED TO THE SUBSTRATE ON ALL HABITABLE STRUCTURES. Exception: DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAT CONTAIN NO CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. 1507.1.2 Snow-shed barriers. ROOFS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SNOW FROM SHEDDING ABOVE OR IN FRONT OF GAS UTILITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY METERS. (33) Section 1507.2.8.2 is repealed in its entirety. ee eRted tegethe.r A-F ef a self adheFiRg pelymeF medified h-i4imeR sheet shall be -0-sed lip,- Af 4 ehes (619 .,-,m) side the 624620:1,0-v.,64'4"Re of the b-0i' iRg E.,eeptieR. Pete hed stFu tuF s that ,+ ;, A. , �;+,R-Aed fl r area (34) Section 1507.4 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 1507.4.1.1 Mechanical barriers for metal roof shingles and metal roof panels. ROOFS WITH METAL ROOF SHINGLES OR METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SNOW FROM SHEDDING ONTO PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR EXITS FROM BUILDINGS AND ONTO SIDEWALKS, STREETS AND ALLEY WAYS. MECHANICAL BARRIERS INSTALLED TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING FROM THE ROOF SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS OR TO SOLID BLOCKING SECURED TO FRAMING MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. INDIVIDUAL DEVICES INSTALLED IN A GROUP OF DEVICES TO CREATE A BARRIER TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AT LEAST TWO ROWS WITH THE FIRST ROW NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. THE ROWS SHALL BE PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND THE DEVICES IN EACH ROW SHALL BE STAGGERED FOR A SPACING OF NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES ON CENTER MEASURED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE. CONTINUOUS SNOW BARRIERS SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING AT NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES ON CENTER. CONTINUOUS BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. (35) Section 1507.5 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 1507.5.1.1 Mechanical barriers for metal roof shingles and metal roof panels. ROOFS WITH METAL ROOF SHINGLES OR METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SNOW FROM SHEDDING ONTO PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR EXITS FROM BUILDINGS AND ONTO SIDEWALKS, STREETS AND ALLEY WAYS. MECHANICAL BARRIERS INSTALLED TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING FROM THE ROOF SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS OR TO SOLID BLOCKING SECURED TO FRAMING MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. INDIVIDUAL DEVICES INSTALLED IN A GROUP OF DEVICES TO CREATE A BARRIER TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AT LEAST TWO ROWS WITH THE FIRST ROW NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. THE ROWS SHALL BE PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND THE DEVICES IN EACH ROW SHALL BE STAGGERED FOR A SPACING OF NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES ON CENTER MEASURED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE. CONTINUOUS SNOW BARRIERS SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING AT NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES ON CENTER. CONTINUOUS BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. (36) Section 1507.5.4 is repealed in its entirety. (37) Section 1507.6.4 is repealed in its entirety. r., ,,..+i„n. n + mot, +. e+ Fe-,; +h-at .+ CEASIRIP-1!*!RAPPJ flARP (38) Section 1507.7.4 is repealed in its entirety. a5,vrrrrTTea�aemTars iii areas vviicic the avciaSc daily te mperata re in danaaFyis �5 (39) Section 1507.8.4 is repealed in its entirety. 3-5,07 9 4 'Ga harroar 'A areas where there has beep histeFy ef lee feFm'Rg aleRg the eaves (40) Section 1507.9.4 is repealed in its entirety. 1-5,07 Q 4 'Ga harroar 'A areas where there has beep histeFy ef lee feFmiRg aleRg the eaves ee eRted tegethe-F A-F ef a self adheFiRg pelymeF medified h-4--ime—A sheet shall be iA lieu. ef 7n �h (619 .,-,m) Re Af the hi-ildiRg (41) Section 1605.2.2 is repealed in its entirety. 69 h- pl a t+9,r5e.Se 6t+9•. 2.3.3 „f n S r r 7 S h a I I "„ I (42) Section 1605.3.1.2 is repealed in its entirety. Ge hIllplat!,,.,S; „f Sent, 1p. 2.41.2 „f ncrr 7 Shat, h„ (43) Section 1608.1 is amended to read as follows: 1608.1 General. Design snow loads shall be determined in accordance v ;'+h Seetie—A 7 of ncrr 7 Table 1608.1, but the design roof load shall not be less than that determined by section 1607. TABLE 1608.1 DESIGN SNOW LOAD FOR ROOFS 9,000 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 98 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 9,250 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 105 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 9,500 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 113 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 9,750 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 120 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,000 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 128 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,250 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 136 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,500 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 145 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,750 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 154 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT (44) Section 1608.2 is amended to read as follows: 1608.2 n..^„R,--;Reyo 1^^^'19ROOF SNOW LOAD. AS DETERMINED BY GRAND COUNTY SNOW LOAD/SNOW ZONE MAP OR GRAND COUNTY SUBDIVISION INDEX. The gFeuR d spew leads+„ SGE 7 e G.,--.re 9Cl1Q 2 fAr+he ee RtiguA r 1 Iri+nrJ stater anrJ T-ahle 9 Cl1Q 2 fA-r Ala-,;k Site- specific case studies shall be made in areas designated "CS" in Figure 1608.2. Gre-API spew lea s ROOF SNOW LOADS{^r +„- at eleyatie—AS ah-e e the .1imi+-s 'Reheated I., Pi„��r„ 1699.2 a for all sites within the CS areas shall be approved. Gre-OR 1 , lead dote-F.,.,;.,-,+;,,.,f„r e-4 (45) Section 1612 is repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows: SECTION 1612 ESTABLISHMENT OF FLOOD HAZARD AREAS. THE TOWN OF FRASER HAS ADOPTED FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS WITHIN CHAPTER 18,ARTICLE 4, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. (46) Section 1703.1 is amended to read as follows: 1703.1 Approved agency. An approved agency shall provide all information as necessary for the building official to determine that the agency meets the applicable requirements. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY OR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE AN APPROVED AGENCY FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. (47) Section 1704 is amended by adding two new subsections to read as follows: 1704.17 Fire protection systems. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE THE DESIGN PLANS APPROVED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY AND THE SYSTEMS INSPECTED AND TESTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. 1704.17.1 Qualifications. SPECIAL INSPECTORS FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE EXPERTISE IN FIRE-PROTECTION. SPECIAL INSPECTORS FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS SHALL BE A CERTIFIED FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS INSPECTOR BY THE STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY. Exception: SPECIAL INSPECTION BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS. (48) Section 1804.4 is repealed in its entirety. 3904.41 Grading and fall iRflG_G_d_ hi-lZiNd- aFeas. 1612.3, -,. 'Rg @Rd eF fill shall Ret be G ,e4J eFesieR 6iFi Rg the-rise aAd faII „f fleeP-1 , ,-,*e.-aAd as-appliEabl v.;ave ae-41e., 2. IR fl.,.,.J,. ays unless It has tree, de-P- R-R-strated thFe gh hydF,,legie @Rd hydFaulie -,etiee that the p ed ., -,. 'Rg eF fill . beth v.;' RA* .es-4 , H.,Z.,.d. G e6,.,- eRt will Ret a the rdesigR fleerd .,I.,..-,+iep mere+hap 'I feet (395 mm) at @Ry ..+ (49) Section 1805.1.2.1 is repealed in its entirety. A Seetielp 116i2.3,the fiRished gFe6wd level ef;-;A _,.AP_IeF fleeF spaee Sibileh a erawl spaee shall 7_R 11 (50) Section 1807.1 is amended to read as follows: 1807.1 Foundation walls. Foundation walls shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Sections 1807.1.1 through 1807.1.6. Foundation walls shall be supported by fe- FOOTINGS designed in accordance with Section 1808. (51) Section 1808 is amended to read as follows: SECTION 1808 FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS (52) Section 1808.1 is amended to read as follows: 1808.1 General. FOOTINGS AND foundations shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Sections 1808.2 through 1808.9. Shallow FOOTINGS AND foundations shall also satisfy the requirements of Section 1809. Deep FOOTINGS AND foundations shall also satisfy the requirements of Section 1810. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON CONTINUOUS SOLID OR FULLY GROUTED MASONRY OR CONCRETE FOOTINGS. CONCRETE FOOTINGS SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF TWO#4 REINFORCEMENT BARS TO BE TIED CONTINUOUSLY AND SPACED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE GROUND AND EQUALLY WITHIN THE FOOTING. EXCEPTION: UNLESS DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY AN ENGINEER. (53) Section 1808.2 is amended to read as follows: 1808.2 Design for capacity and settlement. FOOTINGS AND foundations shall be so designed that the allowable bearing capacity of the soil is not exceeded and the differential settlement is minimized. FOOTINGS AND foundations in areas with expansive soils shall be designed in accordance with the provisions of Section 1808.6 (54) Section 1808.3 is amended to read as follows: 1808.3 Design loads. FOOTINGS AND foundations shall be designed for the most unfavorable effects due to the combinations of loads specified in Section 1605.2 or 1605.3. The dead load is permitted to include the weight of foundations and overlying fill. Red-Heed live-Ins;-as T (55) Section 1809 is amended to read as follows: SECTION 1809 SHALLOW FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS (56) Section 1809.1 is amended by adding three new subsections to read as follows: 1809.1 General. Shallow FOOTINGS AND foundations shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Sections 1809.2 through 1809.13. 1809.1.1 FOOTINGS. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON CONTINUOUS SOLID OR FULLY GROUTED MASONRY OR CONCRETE FOOTINGS. CONCRETE FOOTINGS SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF TWO#4 REINFORCEMENT BARS TO BE TIED CONTINUOUSLY AND SPACED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE GROUND AND EQUALLY WITHIN THE FOOTING. THERE SHALL BE#4 VERTICAL REBAR 4 FEET ON CENTER, MINIMUM. VERTICAL REBAR SHALL EXTEND FROM THE FOOTING TO THE TOP COURSE OF THE HORIZONTAL FOUNDATION WALL REBAR. EXCEPTION: UNLESS DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY AN ENGINEER. 1809.1.1.2 FOUNDATIONS. THE MINIMUM FOUNDATION DESIGN IS AN 8-INCH-THICK CONCRETE WALL. WALLS UP TO AND INCLUDING 4 FEET IN HEIGHT REQUIRE TWO#4 CONTINUOUS REBAR IN THE TOP OF THE WALL. WALLS OVER 4 FEET UP TO AND INCLUDING 8 FEET IN HEIGHT REQUIRE TWO#4 CONTINUOUS REBAR TOP AND BOTTOM. WALLS OVER 8 FEET IN HEIGHT ARE REQUIRED TO BE DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY AN ENGINEER. ALL FOUNDATION WALLS REQUIRE#4 VERTICAL REBAR 4 FEET ON CENTER, MINIMUM. EXCEPTION: UNLESS DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY AN ENGINEER. 1809.1.1.3 PIERS. ALL CONCRETE PIERS SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF TWO #4 VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT BARS TO BE SPACED EQUALLY WITHIN THE PIER. EXCEPT FOR STEEL DOWELS EMBEDDED 5 FEET OR LESS IN THE PIER, REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE ASSEMBLED AND TIED TOGETHER AND SHALL BE PLACED IN THE PIER HOLE AS A UNIT BEFORE THE REINFORCED PORTION OF THE PIER IS FILLED WITH CONCRETE. EXCEPTIONS: 1 UNLESS DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY AN ENGINEER. 2 REINFORCEMENT IS PERMITTED TO BE WET SET AND THE 2 %:-INCH CONCRETE COVER REQUIREMENT BE REDUCED TO 2 INCHES FOR GROUP R-3 AND GROUP U OCCUPANCIES NOT EXCEEDING TWO STORIES OF LIGHT-FRAME CONSTRUCTION, PROVIDED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION METHOD CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. (57) Section 1809.3 is amended to read as follows: 1809.3 Stepped footings. The top surface of footings shall be level. The bottom surface of footings shall be permitted to have a slope not exceeding one unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10-percent slope). Footings shall be stepped where it is necessary to change the elevation of the top surface of the footing or where the surface of the ground slopes more than one unit vertical in 10 units horizontal (10-percent slope). ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON CONTINUOUS SOLID OR FULLY GROUTED MASONRY OR CONCRETE FOOTINGS. CONCRETE FOOTINGS SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF TWO#4 REINFORCEMENT BARS TO BE TIED CONTINUOUSLY AND SPACED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE GROUND AND EQUALLY WITHIN THE FOOTING. THERE SHALL BE#4 VERTICAL REBAR 4 FEET ON CENTER, MINIMUM. VERTICAL REBAR SHALL EXTEND FROM THE FOOTING TO THE TOP COURSE OF THE HORIZONTAL FOUNDATION WALL REBAR. (58) Section 1809.4 is amended to read as follows: 1809.4 Depth and width AND EDGE THICKNESS of SPREAD footings. The minimum depth of SPREAD footings below the - ^d;-s+, ,heed gFeuRd s ,.{^^^ FINISHED GRADE shall be 12 'Ar-hes 30 INCHES, MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING. Where applicable, the requirements of Section 1809.5 shall also be satisfied. The minimum width of SPREAD footings shall be 12 'Rehes (39&-R+w4 16 INCHES. THE MINIMUM EDGE THICKNESS OF SPREAD FOOTINGS SHALL BE 8 INCHES. (59) Section 1809.5 is amended to read as follows: 1809.5 Frost protection. Except where otherwise protected from frost, foundations and other permanent supports of buildings and structures shall be protected from frost by one or more of the following methods: 1. Extending below the frost line of the locality; 30 INCHES; 2. Constructing in accordance with ASCE 32; or 3. Erecting on solid rock. Exception: Freestanding buildings meeting a4 BOTH of the following conditions shall not be required to be protected: i. AssigRed to n^^. ter.,^„C-Gte y ,.-„i aeeeFdapee , ;ith seeti p 1 cnn q �. 1. Area of 699 (56-R-r�}120 square feet or less for light-frame construction or nnn 4) 120 square feet or less for other than light-frame construction; and -3. 2. Eave height of 10 feet (3,048 mm) or less. Shallow foundations shall not bear on frozen soil eh {r^iz^^ ^ ^d;+;^^ is of^ ^+ (60) Section 1809.7 is repealed in its entirety. T-,hl., 18ll9 7 is 1ele*e.1 its eRtiFety (61) Section 2111.1.1 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 2111.1.1.1 LIMITATION ON THE NUMBER. THE NUMBER OF APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES OR DEVICES WHICH MAY BE INSTALLED SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING LIMITS: 1. DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING: ONE APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE OR DEVICE PER DWELLING. 2. BUILDING WITH TWO DWELLING UNITS: ONE APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE OR DEVICE PER DWELLING UNIT,PROVIDED THAT THE DWELLING UNIT IS GREATER THAN 1,500 SQUARE FEET IN TOTAL LIVING AREA. 3. APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUMS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS: APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUMS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO INSTALL ONE APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE OR DEVICE IN A LOBBY OR OTHER COMMON AREA OF THE APARTMENT, CONDOMINIUM OR HOTEL. ONLY AN APPROVED NONSOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE MAY BE INSTALLED WITHIN ANY APARTMENT, CONDOMINIUM OR HOTEL/MOTEL ROOM. (62) Section 2301.2 is amended to read as follows: 2301.2 General design requirements. The design of structural elements or systems, constructed partially or wholly of wood or wood-based products, shall be in accordance on one of the following methods. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ANY OF THESE DESIGN METHODS. (63) Section 2303.1.10 is amended by adding two exceptions to read as follows: 2303.1.10 Structural log members. Stress grading of structural log members of nonrectangular shape, as typically used in log buildings, shall be in accordance with ASTM D 3957. Such structural log members shall be identified by the grade mark of an approved lumber grading or inspection agency. In lieu of a grade mark on the material, a certificate of inspection as to species and grade issued by a lumber grading or inspection agency meeting the requirements of this section shall be permitted. Exceptions: 1. IN SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS OF LOG CONSTRUCTION,WALL LOGS NEED NOT BE GRADED. 2. IN SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS OF LOG CONSTRUCTION,ALL STRUCTURAL LOGS MAY BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED COLORADO ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AND INSPECTED BY THAT ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE FRAMING WITH THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CERTIFYING TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT THAT THE LOGS ARE OF THE SIZE, QUALITY AND SPECIES OF THE DESIGN AND THAT THEY WERE INSTALLED TO THAT DESIGN. WALL LOGS NEED NOT BE PART OF THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN. (64) Section 2303.4.1 is amended to read as follows: 2303.4.1 Design. Wood trusses shall be designed in accordance with the provisions of this Code and accepted engineering practice. Members are permitted to be joined by nails, glue, bolts, timber connectors, metal connector plates or other approved framing devices. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOF SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ANY OF THESE DESIGN METHODS. (65) Section 2304.2 is amended to read as follows: 2304.2 Size of structural members. Computations to determine the required sizes of members shall be based on the net dimensions (actual sizes) and not nominal sizes. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOF SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ANY OF THESE COMPUTATIONS. (66) Section 2304.4 is amended to read as follows: 2304.4 Floor and roof framing. The framing of wood-joisted floors and wood framed roofs shall be in accordance with the provisions specified in Section 2308 unless a specific design is furnished. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOFS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. (67) Section 2304.7.2 is amended to read as follows: 2304.7.2 Structural roof sheathing. Structural roof sheathing shall be designed in accordance with the general provisions of this Code and the special provisions in this section. Roof sheathing conforming to the provisions of Table 2304.7(1), 2304.7(2), 2304.7(3) or 2304.7(5) shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this section. Wood structural panel roof sheathing shall be bonded by exterior glue. EXCEPTION: A MINIMUM OF 5/8-INCH PLYWOOD, PARTICLE BOARD OR WAFERWOOD SHALL BE USED ON ROOF RAFTERS OR ROOF TRUSSES SPACED 24 INCHES ON CENTER IN ANY SNOW LOAD AREA. (68) Section 2308.9.5.1 is amended to read as follows: 2308.9.5.1 Headers. Headers shall be provided over each opening in exterior-bearing walls. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOF SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. The spaRs IR Table - ., itte,_ to be i ed fe-F pp-I twe family 1 er? Headers shall be of two pieces of nominal 2-inch (51 mm)framing lumber set on edge, MINIMUM as peFmitted by Table 2398 °.5 and nailed together in accordance with Table 2304.9.1 or of solid lumber of equivalent size. (69) Section 2308.10.3 is amended to read as follows: 2308.10.3 Rafter spans. Allowable spans for rafters shall be in accordance with Table 2308.10.3(1), 2308.10.3(2), 2308.10.3(3), 2308.10.3(4), 2308.10.3(5) or 2308.10.3(6). For other grades and species, refer to the AF&PA Span Tables for Joists and Rafters. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOF SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. (70) Section 2308.10.8 is amended to read as follows: 2308.10.8 Roof sheathing. Roof sheathing shall be in accordance with Tables 2304.7(3) and 2304.7(5) for wood structural panels, and Tables 2304.7(1) and 2304.7(2) for lumber and shall comply with Section 2304.7.2. EXCEPTION: A MINIMUM OF 5/8-INCH PLYWOOD, PARTICLE BOARD OR WAFERWOOD SHALL BE USED ON ROOF RAFTERS OR ROOF TRUSSES SPACED 24 INCHES ON CENTER IN ANY SNOW LOAD AREA. (71) Section 2901.1 is amended to read as follows: [P] 2901.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter and the International Plumbing Code shall govern the erection, installation, alteration, repairs, relocation, replacement, addition to, use or maintenance of plumbing equipment and systems. Plumbing systems and equipment shall be constructed, installed and maintained in accordance with the International Plumbing Code. Ee�e- (72) Section 2901 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: [P] 2901.1.1 SANITATION AT CONSTRUCTION SITES. TOILET FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, AND SUCH FACILITIES SHALL BE CONVENIENTLY LOCATED AND MAINTAINED IN A SANITARY CONDITION. THE FACILITIES SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR USE FROM THE START OF THE PROJECT UNTIL THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED. (73) Section 3001.1 is amended to read as follows: 3001.1 Scope. This chapter governs the design, construction, installation, alteration, MAINTENANCE and repair of NEW AND EXISTING INSTALLATIONS OF elevators, DUMBWAITERS, ESCALATORS AND MOVING WALKS @Rd eeRvey'Rg systems @Rd their empeReRts REQUIRING PERMITS THEREFOR PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SUCH CONVEYANCES. (74) Chapter 30, concerning elevators, moving walks, escalators or dumbwaiters, is amended by adding four new sections and subsections to read as follows: SECTION 3009 PERMITS&CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION 3009.1 PERMITS REQUIRED. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO INSTALL ANY NEW ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALK, OR TO MAKE MAJOR ALTERATIONS TO ANY EXISTING ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALK, AS DEFINED IN PART XII OF ASME A17.1, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A PERMIT FOR SUCH INSTALLATION FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. PERMITS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR MAINTENANCE OR MINOR ALTERATIONS. 3009.2 CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION REQUIRED. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO OPERATE ANY ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALK WITHOUT A CURRENT CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION ISSUED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH CERTIFICATE SHALL BE ISSUED UPON PAYMENT OF PRESCRIBED FEES AND THE PRESENTATION OF A VALID INSPECTION REPORT INDICATING THAT THE CONVEYANCE IS SAFE AND THAT THE INSPECTIONS AND TESTS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART X OF ASME A17.1. CERTIFICATES SHALL NOT BE ISSUED WHEN THE CONVEYANCE IS POSTED AS UNSAFE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3010. EXCEPTION: CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR CONVEYANCES WITHIN A DWELLING UNIT. 3009.3 APPLICATION FOR PERMITS. APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO INSTALL SHALL BE MADE ON FORMS PROVIDED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL,AND THE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED TO AN OWNER UPON PAYMENT OF THE PERMIT FEES SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION. 3009.4 APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION. APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE BY THE OWNER OF AN ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALK. APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY AN INSPECTION REPORT AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3009. FEES FOR CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION. SECTION 3010 DESIGN 3010.1 DETAILED REQUIREMENTS. FOR DETAIL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS, SEE CHAPTER 16 AND THE APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1. SECTION 3011 REQUIREMENTS FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 3011.1 GENERAL. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EACH ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR AND MOVING WALK INSTALLATION AND SHALL CAUSE PERIODIC INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE ON SUCH CONVEYANCES AS REQUIRED IN THIS SECTION. 3011.2 PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND TEST. ROUTINE AND PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND TESTS SHALL BE MADE AS REQUIRED BY PART X OF ASME A17.1. 3011.3 ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE. ALTERNATIONS, REPAIRS,AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE MADE AS REQUIRED BY PART XII OF ASME A17.1. 3011.4 INSPECTION COSTS. ALL COST OF SUCH INSPECTIONS AND TEST SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNER. 3011.5 INSPECTION REPORTS. AFTER EACH REQUIRED INSPECTION,A FULL AND CORRECT REPORT OF SUCH INSPECTION SHALL BE FILED WITH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SECTION 3012 UNSAFE CONDITIONS 3012.1 UNSAFE CONDITIONS. WHEN AN INSPECTION REVEALS AN UNSAFE CONDITION OF AN ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALK,THE INSPECTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY FILE WITH THE OWNER AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL A FULL AND TRUE REPORT OF SUCH INSPECTION AND SUCH UNSAFE CONDITION. IF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FINDS THAT AN UNSAFE CONDITION ENDANGERS HUMAN LIFE,THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL CAUSE TO BE PLACED ON SUCH ELEVATOR, DUMBWAITER, ESCALATOR OR MOVING WALK, IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE,A NOTICE STATING THAT CONVEYANCE IS UNSAFE. THE OWNER SHALL SEE TO IT THAT SUCH NOTICE OF UNSAFE CONDITION IS LEGIBLY MAINTAINED WHERE PLACED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL ALSO ISSUE AN ORDER IN WRITING TO THE OWNER REQUIRING THE REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS TO BE MADE TO SUCH CONVEYANCE THAT ARE NECESSARY TO RENDER IT SAFE AND MAY ORDER THE OPERATION THEREOF DISCONTINUED UNTIL THE REPAIRS OR ALTERATIONS ARE MADE OR THE UNSAFE CONDITIONS ARE REMOVED. A POSTED NOTICE OF UNSAFE CONDITIONS SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WHEN SATISFIED THAT THE UNSAFE CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. (75) Section 3109.3 is amended by adding an exception to read as follows: 3109.3 Public swimming pools. Public swimming pools shall be completely enclosed by a fence at least 4 feet (1,290 mm) in height or a screen enclosure. Openings in the fence shall not permit the passage of a four-inch-diameter (102 mm) sphere. The fence or screen enclosure shall be equipped with self-closing and self-latching gates. EXCEPTION:A SWIMMING POOL WITH A POWER SAFETY COVER OR A SPA WITH A SAFETY COVER COMPLYING WITH ASTM F 1346. (76) Section 3309 is amended to read as follows: [F] 3309.1 Where required. All structures under construction, alteration or demolition shall be provided with not less than one approved portable fire extinguishers '^ e-,lope, v ;ith seetie^ one app-I Slied fe.r R,,+ than eFd!. @Fy haiard fellews AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 1. At each stairway on all floor levels where combustible materials have accumulated. 2. In every storage and construction shed. 3. Additional portable fire extinguishers shall be provided where special hazards exist, such as the storage and use of flammable and combustible liquids. (77) Section 3311.1 is amended to read as follows: [F] 3311.1 Where required. In buildings required to have standpipes by Section 905.3.1, AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. Ret l„65;thap eRe standpipe shall be r ;ded fee iise fleeFiRg. (78) Section 3311.2 is amended to read as follows: [F] 3311.2 Buildings being demolished. Where a building is being demolished and a standpipe exists within such a building, such standpipe shall be maintained in an operable condition so as to be available for use by the fire department. Such standpipe shall be demolished with the building but shall not be demolished more than one floor below the floor being demolished OR AS APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. (79) Section 3311.4 is amended to read as follows: 3311.4 Water supply. Water supply for fire protection, either temporary or permanent, shall be made available as soon as combustible material accumulates OR AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. (80) Section 3401.3 is amended to read as follows: 3401.3 Compliance. Alterations, repairs, additions and changes of occupancy to existing structures shall comply with the provisions for alterations, repairs, buildings and additions and changes of occupancy in the 4 ... G4.Q.Q^' moire Ge4e International Fuel Gas Code, International Mechanical Code, International Plumbing Code, '^+^r^^+:^. G.1 or^^^r+„❑4^1 42.Q^.Q,.2 Gede A.te tieQ.Q.G.,-Dr;�ate C^1. ^^^ Sir^^r^' ^�'^ International Residential Code and NFPA 70. (81) Section 3401.5 is repealed in its entirety. 9644iny Ge4e shall be deemed te eemply with the ef this GhapteF. (82) Section 3403.2 is repealed in its entirety. es�efiRed 'A sest+eR1612.' shall e ply with the freed design r nts;f^r A r+r re+ ^ (83) Section 3404.2 is repealed in its entirety. eeRstFuetieR, @Rd all aspect,-; Ref the ep.wistiny str-6iet6ir-e shall be bFeught !Rte GemplIaRee with t4& r+r CC* ^ (84) Section 3409.2 is repealed in its entirety. u•r+ rC oi- r, bete m'Red by the S t ��H„ i i c Department f i,+ ri r +rib +iRg „+H„ Z. �C CTI..CS]'I CTRV�� rOT1T�CCTCTQSC�TTL'T'1_TLrCR� C'O CTR_ hir+^riral r Rifiea Ree ^f iste Fe d hir+^rir dir+rir+^ a dir+rir+ r elimlr\a4y I gesigRated as tiffs+,,.ie . -, ,,. i i tiffsteFie atieR m th;# (85) Section 3412.2 is amended to read as follows: 3412.2 Applicability. Structures existing prior to -PATE T/l -RP- inicroTrn QY TLJC ii ioicniCTinn41971, Wete: +tiles ph#p with+ti„ „ff„r#!.,,, ph#p „� bull d;Rg eedes with;.,the uFisdietieRin which there is work involving additions, alterations or changes of occupancy. shall be made to comply with the requirements of this section or the provisions of Sections 3403 through 3409. The provisions in Sections 3412.2.1 through 3412.2.5 shall apply to existing occupancies that will continue to be, or are proposed to be, in Groups A, B, E, F, M, R, S and U. These provisions shall not apply to buildings with occupancies in Group H or I. (86) Section 3412.2.4.1 is repealed in its entirety. (87) Section 3412.3.2 is repealed in its entirety. r-P de (88) Section 3412.4 is amended to read as follows: 3412.4 Investigation and evaluation. For proposed work covered by this section, the building owner shall cause the existing building to be investigated and evaluated in accordance with the provisions of this section BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. EXCEPTION: GROUP R, DIVISION 3 AND GROUP U OCCUPANCIES. (89) Section 3412.6 is amended to read as follows: 3412.6 Evaluation process. THE BUILDING OWNER SHALL CAUSE THE EXISTING BUILDING TO BE EVALUATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. The evaluation process specified herein shall be followed in its entirety to evaluate existing buildings. Table 3412.7 shall be utilized for tabulating the results of the evaluation. References to other sections of this Code indicate that compliance with those sections is required in order to gain credit in the evaluation herein outlined. In applying this section to a building with mixed occupancies, where the separation between the mixed occupancies does not qualify for any category indicated in Section 3412.6.16,the score for each occupancy shall be determined and the lower score determined for each section of the evaluation process shall apply to the entire building. Where the separation between the mixed occupancies qualifies for any category indicated in Section 3412.6.16,the score for each occupancy shall apply to each portion of the building based on the occupancy of the space. EXCEPTION: GROUP R, DIVISION 3 AND GROUP U OCCUPANCIES. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (b) The following sections of the International Residential Code, adopted by reference in Section 18-1-10 of this Article, is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section R101.1 is amended to read as follows: R101.1 Title. These provisions shall be known as the Residential Code for One-and Two family Dwellings of the Town of Fraser, and shall be cited as such and will be referred to herein as "this Code." (2) Section R102.7 is amended to read as follows: R102.7 Existing structures. The legal occupancy of any structure existing on the date of adoption of this Code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as is specifically covered in this Code,the h4.i2F.QG4ePGi Preperty Geae A-.the International Fire Code, or as is deemed necessary by the building official for the general safety and welfare of the occupants and the public. (3) Section R103.2 is amended to read as follows: R103.2 Appointment-BUILDING OFFICIAL. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(5) OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (4) Section R103.3 is amended to read as follows: R103.3 Deputies. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(A)(6) OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (5) Section R104.8 is amended to read as follows: R104.8 Liability. jEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(8) OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (6) Section R105.2 is amended to read as follows: R105.2 Work exempt from permit. Permits shall not be required for the following. Exemption from the permit requirements of this Code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this Code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided that the floor area does not exceed 2-99 120 square feet 4g.=Iig +#�'). 2. Fences not over 6 feet(1,829 mm) high. 3. Retaining walls which are not over 4 feet(1,219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge. 4. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. 5. ^'^ ^" ^^^' ^'~'1 ,^v ;^1 PLATFORMS,WALKS AND DRIVEWAYS AT GRADE AND WHICH ARE NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. 6. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish work. 7. Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep. 8. Swings and other playground equipment. 9. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall which do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 10. _Peeks Pet a .,. 'Rg 299 s e feet (14 CQFW) I that a et .,-, a+hap RP r,=ehes-a,beye-yr-G4e at a�iy=p^eiRt,, @re-Ret attached *A- a @Rd d„ Ret SerfP thp ^.4 de-e-F Feq 'Fed by Seeti p RRI I nAGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS AS DEFINED HEREIN. (7) Section R105.5 is amended to read as follows: R105.5 Expiration. EVERY PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE SHALL EXPIRE 24 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUE. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. The building official is authorized to grant, in writing, one eF meFe extention of time, for A periods OF not more than 180 days.e� The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. (8) Section R106.1 is amended by adding new sections to read: R106.1.4 PROOF OF WATER AND SEWER. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT OF AN APPROVED WATER AND SEWER UTILITY PLAN WHICH MAY INCLUDE PAYING THE REQUIRED WATER AND SEWER TAP FEES. R106.1.5 EMERGENCY SERVICES IMPACT FEE. A DEVELOPER REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REQUIRING ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY SERVICES SHALL PAY THE IMPACT FEE TO THE EMERGENCY SERVICES PROVIDED PRIOR TO ANY ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE TOWN. SEE SECTION 18-6-30. (9) Section R106.3 is amended by adding a new section to read as follows: R106.3.1 REQUIRED APPROVALS. THE APPLICATION AND DOCUMENTS FOR A PERMIT SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN ORDINANCES. (10) Section R106.3.3 is amended to read as follows: R106.3.3 Phased approval. The building official SHALL NOT ISSUE A PERMIT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. +ti,,.; 1+„ ;ss 61 e a perR4.4 f,,.+ti„ .,-+.,,e+;,,., „� the y.ghelebuild!Rg eF submitted, pFevided that adequate 'ri:'A';;*'A'A' 'A'4 elptire will be gF@A*PPJ (11) Section R108.2 is amended to read as follows: R108.2 Schedule of permit fees. On buildings, structures, °'^ T gas, mechanical and plumbing systems or alterations requiring a permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required, in accordance with the se-hed„'^a;;,-; established by the plie,"'^ ^ utheF;+.. APPENDICES B AND C OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (12) Section R108.5 is amended to read as follows: R108.5 Refunds. The building official is authorized to establish a refund policy. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY AUTHORIZE REFUNDING OF NOT MORE THAN 80 PERCENT OF THE PERMIT FEE PAID WHEN NO WORK HAS BEEN DONE UNDER A PERMIT ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CODE. THE DEPOSIT PAID FOR A PERMIT APPLICATION IS NONREFUNDABLE. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL NOT AUTHORIZE REFUNDING OF ANY FEE PAID EXCEPT ON WRITTEN APPLICATION FILED BY THE ORIGINAL PERMITTEE NOT LATER THAN 180 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FEE PAYMENT. (13) Section R108.6 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R108.6 Work commencing before permit issuance. Any person who commences work requiring a permit on a building, structure, electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to a fee established by the applicable governing authority that shall be in addition to the required permit fees. THE INVESTIGATION FEE SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX B OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (14) Section 109.1.3 is repealed in its entirety. r (15) Section R109 is amended by adding a two new subsection to read as follows: R109.5 REINSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE, IN AN AMOUNT PER APPENDIX B OF THr- ERASER MUNICIPAL CODE, MAY BE ASSESSED FOR EACH INSPECTION OR REINSPECTION WHEN SUCH PORTION OF WORK FOR WHICH INSPECTION IS CALLED IS NOT COMPLETE OR WHEN CORRECTIONS CALLED FOR ARE NOT MADE. REINSPECTION FEES MAY BE ASSESSED WHEN THE INSPECTION RECORD CARD IS NOT POSTED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE ON THE WORK SITE,THE APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR, FOR FAILING TO PROVIDE ACCESS ON THE DATE FOR WHICH THE INSPECTION IS REQUESTED, OR DEVIATING FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. IN INSTANCES WHERE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN ASSESSED, NO ADDITIONAL INSPECTION OF THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 109.5.1 USE TAX REQUIREMENTS. SEE SECTION 4-3-20. (16) Section R110.1 is amended by adding an additional exception to read as follows: R110.1 Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made, until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy therefor as provided herein. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this Code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this Code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. Exceptions 1. Certificates of occupancy are not required for work exempt from permits under Section R105.2. 2. Accessory buildings of structures. 3. Group U Occupancy. (17) Section R112.1 is amended to read as follows: R112.1 General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL relative to the application and interpretation of this Code, there shall be and is hereby created a beaFd ef appe4l-'THL CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS ESTABLISHED IN PARAGRAPH 18-1 30(21) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF FRASEP The building official OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL shall be an ex officio member of said board but shall have no vote on any matter before the board. The board of appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the building official OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. A NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FEE OF$250.00. (18) Section R112.2.1 is repealed in its entirety. R195.3.14, the be@Fd ef appeals shall .,+ r @Fdlnrr of the r eFk perfe-FA ed The+nrpq .Jnnr Apt i nI .Jn• pFeelude the desigRatieR as r his+nrin buildiRg n 6461ntuFe (19) Section R112.2.2 is repealedin its entirety. RI 1:2 :2 :2 Gratarka for of a warkaRga for PFane%a flooding. Ak,@Fiapee shall he nd eRly I n rt,n,.,i.,n of geed apel su f inin.,+ ea.-se +t, ++t,n uRique nt, r n+nrir+inr nf+t,n r rTi}Re TLI r eais to�J'QhIlTin safety, e)k RQC'I di.@Fy publin CxpCTI sC, r n 4@61r n of the public, n Rfliet with n ir+iRg lee@! laws n +4,n fInn.J h;4;Z;4 r.J rLr+n I4n -;Rd p F e p nr+., (20) Section R202 is amended by adding the following definitions within the alphabetical order of the existing definitions: ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE ON THE SAME LOT WITH THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HOUSING THE PRINCIPAL USE, BUT HOUSING A USE CUSTOMARILY INCIDENTAL AND SUBORDINATE TO THE PRINCIPAL USE. AGRICULTURAL BUILDING. A STRUCTURE LOCATED ON REAL PROPERTY CLASSIFIED AS AGRICULTURE BY THE GRAND COUNTY ASSESSOR THAT IS DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND USED TO HOUSE FARM IMPLEMENTS, HAY, GRAIN, POULTRY, LIVESTOCK OR OTHER HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS. THIS STRUCTURE SHALL NOT BE A PLACE OF HUMAN HABITATION OR A PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT WHERE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED, TREATED OR PACKAGED, NOR SHALL IT BE A PLACE USED BY THE PUBLIC. BEDROOM. A ROOM WHICH IS DESIGNED AS A SLEEPING ROOM,A LOFT,A MEZZANINE IN GROUP R OCCUPANCIES OR A ROOM OR AREA THAT CAN BE USED AS A SLEEPING ROOM AND CONTAINS A CLOSET. DWELLING UNIT,ACCESSORY. ONE (1) OR MORE ROOMS IN A DWELLING DESIGNED FOR OCCUPANCY BY ONE (1) FAMILY FOR LIVING PURPOSES, INCIDENTAL AND SUBORDINATE IN SIZE AND CHARACTER TO THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE AND HAVING NOT MORE THAN ONE (1) KITCHEN. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST TWO HUNDRED (200) SQUARE FEET OF HABITABLE FLOOR AREA. FACTORY BUILT BUILDING. A BUILDING WHICH IS ASSEMBLED IN A FACILITY THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO, BUILT TO THE BUILDING, PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE COLORADO DIVISION OF HOUSING,WITH THE WORK PERFORMED AT THE FACILITY INSPECTED BY AND BEARING THE COLORADO DIVISION OF HOUSING IDENTIFICATION LABEL. FIRE DEPARTMENT. THE CHIEF OFFICER OF EAST GRAND, GRANBY, GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, GRAND LAKE, HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS,AND KREMMLING FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS, OR THE CHIEF OFFICER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. emirs l ],_+- Ar=e F.,,.... n.-ede .Beige to the „ height of the higheSt . of s rf BUILDING HEIGHT. THE VERTICAL DISTANCE ABOVE A REFERENCE DATUM MEASURED TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE STRUCTURE. THE REFERENCE DATUM SHALL BE SELECTED BY EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING,WHICHEVER YIELDS A GREATER HEIGHT OF BUILDING: A. THE ELEVATION OF THE HIGHEST ADJOINING SIDEWALK OR GROUND SURFACE WITHIN A FIVE-FOOT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING WHEN SUCH SIDEWALK OR GROUND SURFACE IS NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET ABOVE LOWEST GRADE. B. AN ELEVATION FIVE (5) FEET HIGHER THAN THE LOWEST GRADE WHEN THE SIDEWALK OR GROUND SURFACE DESCRIBED IN SUBPARAGRAPH A. ABOVE IS MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET ABOVE THE LOWEST GRADE. r THE HEIGHT OF A STEPPED OR TERRACED BUILDING IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ANY SEGMENT OF THE BUILDING. KITCHEN. Anarea used, or designated to be used, for the preparation of food. A ROOM OR AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED TO BE USED FOR THE PREPARATION OF FOOD WHICH CONTAINS MORE THAN ONE STANDARD SIZE KITCHEN APPLIANCE OR FIXTURE. MANUFACTURED HOME. A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING WHICH IS PARTIALLY OR ENTIRELY ASSEMBLED IN A FACTORY, IS NOT LESS THAN TWENTY-FOUR FEET IN WIDTH AND THIRTY-SIX FEET IN LENGTH, IS INSTALLED ON AN ENGINEERED, PERMANENT FOUNDATION, HAS A BRICK, WOOD OR COSMETICALLY EQUIVALENT EXTERIOR AND A PITCHED ROOF, IS CERTIFIED PURSUANT TO THE"NATIONAL MANUFACTURED HOUSING CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT OF 1974",42 U.S.C. 5401 ET SEQ.,AS AMENDED,AND BEARING THE H.U.D. IDENTIFICATION LABEL. INSTALLED AND SET UP AS REQUIRED IN THE SET UP MANUAL SUPPLIED WITH THE MANUFACTURED HOME. (21) Table R301.2 (1) is amended to read as follows: Table R301.2 (1) Roof Snow Load 9,000 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 98 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 9,250 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 105 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 9,500 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 113 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 9,750 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 120 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,000 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 128 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,250 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 136 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,500 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 145 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 10,750 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL IS 154 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT WIND IS NINETY(90) MILES PER HOUR SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY IS"B" WEATHERING PROBABILITY FOR CONCRETE IS SEVERE FROST LINE DEPTH IS THIRTY(30) INCHES TERMITE INFESTATION PROBABILITY NONE TO SLIGHT DECAY PROBABILITY IS NONE TO SLIGHT WINTER DESIGN TEMPERATURE IS -16 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT FLOOD HAZARDS, SEE FLOOD INSURANCE REFERENCE MAP (22) Table R301.5 is amended to read as follows: Table R301.5 Balconies (exterior) and decks' 4860 Sleeping rooms X840 FOOTNOTE E. UNCOVERED DECKS AND BALCONIES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO A UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOAD OF 60 LBS. PER SQUARE FOOT OR THE DESIGN SNOW LOAD. WHICHEVER IS GREATER. (23) Section R302.3 is amended to read as follows: R302.3 Two-family dwellings. Dwelling units in two-family dwellings shall be separated from each other by wall and/or floor assemblies having not less than a 4 2-HOUR fire-resistance rating when tested in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263. Fire-resistance-rated floor-ceiling and wall assemblies shall extend to and be tight against the exterior wall, and wall assemblies shall extend from the foundation to the underside of the roof sheathing. Exceptions: 1 �. 1. Wall assemblies need not extend through attic spaces when the ceiling is protected by not less than 5/8-inch (15.9 mm)Type X gypsum board and an attic draft stop constructed as specified in Section R302.12.1 is provided above and along the wall assembly separating the dwellings. The structural framing supporting the ceiling shall also be protected by not less than %-inch (12.7 mm)gypsum board or equivalent. (24) Section R305.1 is amended to read as follows: R305.1 Minimum height. Habitable space, hallways, bathrooms,toilet rooms, laundry rooms and peFtieRs a UNFINISHED basements eeRtaiRiRg these spaees shall have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet(2134). THE REQUIRED HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR TO THE LOWEST PROJECTION FROM THE CEILING. Exceptions: 1. For rooms with sloped ceilings, at least 50 percent of the required floor area of the room must have a ceiling height of at least 7 feet(2,134 mm) and no portion of the required floor area may have a ceiling height of less than 5 feet (1,524 mm). 2. Bathrooms shall have a minimum ceiling height of 6 feet 8 inches (2,032 mm) at the center of the front clearance area for fixtures as shown in Figure R307.1. The ceiling height above fixtures shall be such that the fixture is capable of being used for its intended purpose. A shower or tub equipped with a showerhead shall have a minimum ceiling height of 6 feet 8 inches (2,032 mm) above a minimum area 30 inches (762 mm) by 30 inches (762 mm) at the showerhead. (25) Section R305.1.1 is repealed in its entirety. hallways,bathFeems'teilet rep-PAS and lauRdFy Feel:A-s shall have a eei1iRg height ef Ret less;thap (-;feet 9 ehes (2932 mm) (193 1 mm) of the fiAl-shed (26) Section R306 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R306.5 Sanitation at construction sites. TOILET FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS,AND SUCH FACILITIES SHALL BE CONVENIENTLY LOCATED AND MAINTAINED IN A SANITARY CONDITION. THE FACILITIES SHALL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE TIME THE FIRST WORK IS STARTED UNTIL THE LETTER OF OCCUPANCY OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED. (27) Section R309.3 is repealed in its entirety. 2n'I 7/11 gaFage fleers shall h.,. z Tea�tA—„e side @Fe used seleI.,fe. p .k;R bu;Iaeeess, eF steFage, mee cede (28) Section R310.1 is amended to read as follows: R310.1 Emergency escape and rescue required. Basements, habitable attics and every sleeping room, LOFT, MEZZANINE IN GROUP R OCCUPANCIES, OR A ROOM OR AREA THAT CAN BE USED AS A SLEEPING ROOM AND CONTAINS A CLOSET shall have at least one operable emergency escape and rescue opening. Where basements contain one or more sleeping rooms, emergency egress and rescue openings shall be required in each sleeping room. Where emergency escape and rescue openings are provided,they shall have a sill height of not more than 44 inches (1,118 mm) above the floor. Where a door opening having a threshold below the adjacent ground elevation serves as an emergency escape and rescue opening and is provided with a bulkhead enclosure,the bulkhead enclosure shall comply with Section R310.3. The net clear opening dimensions required by this section shall be obtained by the normal operation of the emergency escape and rescue opening from the inside. Emergency escape and rescue openings with a finished sill height below the adjacent ground elevation shall be provided with a window well in accordance with Section R310.2. Emergency escape and rescue openings shall open directly into a public way or to a yard or court that opens to a public way. (29) Section R311.7.4.3 is amended to read as follows: R311.7.4.3 Profile. The radius of curvature at the noising shall be no greater than 9/16 inch (14 mm). A nosing not less than 34 inch (19 mm) but not more than 1% inches (32 mm) shall be provided on stairways with solid risers. The greatest nosing projection shall not exceed the smallest nosing projection by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) between two stories, including the nosing at the level of floors and landings. Beveling of nosing shall not exceed % inch (12.7 mm). Risers shall be vertical or sloped under the tread above from the underside of the nosing above at an angle not more than 30 degrees (0.51 rad)from the vertical. Open risers are permitted, pFevided that the epeRiRg betv.;ee.p treads dees Ret peFmit the passage ef a 4 'Reh (192 mm) diameteF sphere Exceptions: 1. A nosing is not required where the tread depth is a minimum of 11 inches (279 mm). 2. The opening between adjacent treads is not limited on stairs with a total rise of 30 inches (762 mm) or less. (30) Section R313.2 is repealed in its entirety: R232.2 QRP-;and Ave-family dwellings aute-matirs firee systems. Effeetive jaRuaFy 1, 2911, aR .,kIe F ste (31) Section R313.2.1 is repealed in its entirety: R-21-2.24 Opsign and installation A-itematie resideRtial fiFe spFiRkleF Systems shall be desig mT�rrmrrrr (32) Section R322 is repealed in its entirety. SpgtaaR 8222 91 GOD-USISTA NIT.CONSTRI ICTION (33) Section R403.1 is amended to read as follows: R403.1 General. All exterior walls shall be supported on continuous solid or fully grouted masonry or concrete footings, crushed stone footings, wood foundations or other approved structural systems which shall be of sufficient design to accommodate all loads according to Section R301 and to transmit the resulting loads to the soil within the limitations as determined from the character of the soil. Footings shall be supported on undisturbed natural soils or engineered fill. Concrete footing shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions of Section R403 or in accordance with ACI 332. EXCEPT WHERE ERECTED ON SOLID ROCK OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM FROST, FOUNDATION WALLS, PIERS AND OTHER PERMANENT SUPPORTS OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES LARGER THAN 120 SQUARE FEET IN AREA OR 10 FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL EXTEND TO AT LEAST 30 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE, AND SPREAD FOOTINGS OF 8 INCHES THICK X 16 INCHES WIDE MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PROPERLY DISTRIBUTE THE LOAD WITHIN THE ALLOWABLE LOAD-BEARING VALUE OF THE SOIL. ALTERNATIVELY, SUCH STRUCTURES SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON PILES WHERE SOLID EARTH OR ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE. FOOTINGS SHALL NOT BEAR ON FROZEN SOILS. CONCRETE FOOTINGS SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF TWO#4 REINFORCEMENT BARS TO BE TIED CONTINUOUSLY AND SPACED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE GROUND AND EQUALLY WITHIN THE FOOTING. FOOTINGS SHALL BE SO DESIGNED THAT THE ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL IS NOT EXCEEDED AND THAT DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT IS MINIMIZED. THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF FOOTINGS SHALL BE 16 INCHES. EXCEPTION: UNLESS DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY AN ENGINEER. (34) Section R403.1.1 is amended to read as follows: R403.1.1 Minimum size. "";^;^^„^^ fe.^ ^+^ ^^ I . y feet! gs shall be as ^+fe-4 A Table IR4Q-3.1 and PiguFe R41934(1). The feetiRg width, W, shall he h-ased A-.A the lead ,'„^ Af the se" ; , ith Tahle R= ^ 1 Spread footings shall be at least&8 inches (1 52 mm^�'i�r) in thickness. T. Footing projections, P, shall be at least 2 inches (51 mm)and shall not exceed the thickness of the footing. The-slie of feet' gs suppeFt'Rg pieFs Rd Shal "^ based A_.A the tFibutaFy lead app-I allev.;able sell pFess-Hre v.;ith Table R= 4 1 Footings for wood foundations shall be in accordance with the details set forth in Section R403.2, and Figures R403.1(2) and R403.1(3). (35) Section R408.7 is repealed in its entirety. Din 1 The walls n nlesiRg the u RdeF flee.spaee shall be p .ided with fleed n z The fiRished n pd 'eye.1 of the - A JeF fInn.spaee shall ben al to eF Mine.th,., +4n ExGep%ion; I IRdeF flee.r r that meet the r Rts; of CC14A/CIA TD 11 1 (36) Section R502.11 is amended to read as follows: R502.11.1 Design. Wood trusses shall be designed in accordance with approved engineering practice. The design and manufacture of metal plate connected wood trusses shall comply with ANSI/TPI 1. The design drawings shall be prepared by a registered professional where required by the statutes of the jurisdiction in which the project is to be constructed in accordance with Section R106.1. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOF SHALL BE PROHIBITED. (37) Section R602 is amended by adding two (2) new exceptions to read as follows: R602.2 Grade. Studs shall be a minimum No. 3, standard or stud grade lumber. Exception: 1 Bearing studs not supporting floors and nonbearing studs may be utility grade lumber, provided that the studs are spaced in accordance with Table R602.3(5). 2 IN SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS OF LOG CONSTRUCTION,WALL LOGS NEED NOT BE GRADED. 3 IN SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS OF LOG CONSTRUCTION,ALL STRUCTURAL LOGS MAY BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED COLORADO ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AND INSPECTED BY THAT ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE FRAMING,WITH THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CERTIFYING TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT THAT THE LOGS ARE OF THE SIZE, QUALITY AND SPECIES OF THE DESIGN AND THAT THEY WERE INSTALLED TO THAT DESIGN. WALL LOGS NEED NOT BE PART OF THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN. (38) Section R602.3 is amended to read as follows: R602.3 Design and construction. Exterior walls of wood-frame construction shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and Figures R602.3(1) and R602.3(2) or in accordance with AF&PA's NDS. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD SHALL BE PROHIBITED. Components of exterior walls shall be fastened in accordance with Tables R602.3(1)through R602.3(4). Structural wall sheathing shall be fastened directly to structural framing members. Exterior wall coverings shall be capable of resisting the wind pressures listed in Table R301.2(2) adjusted for height and exposure using table R301.2(3). Wood structural panel sheathing used for exterior walls shall conform to the requirements of Table R602.3(3). Studs shall be continuous from support at the sole plate to a support at the top plate to resist loads perpendicular to the wall. The support shall be a foundation of floor, ceiling or roof diaphragm or shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. Exception:Jack studs, trimmer studs and cripple studs at openings in wall that comply with Table R502.5(1) and R502.5(2). (39) Section R612.2 is repealed in its entirety (40) Section R802.2 is amended to read as follows: R802.2 Design and construction. The framing details required in Section R802 apply to roofs having a minimum slope of three units vertical in 12 units horizontal (25-percent slope) or greater. Roof-ceilings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and Figures R606.11 (1), R606.11 (2) and R606.11 (3) or in accordance with AFPA/NDS. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD SHALL BE PROHIBITED. Components of roof-ceilings shall be fastened in accordance with Table R602.3 (1). (41) Section R802.10 is amended to read as follows: R802.10.2 Design. Wood trusses shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. The design and manufacture of metal-plate-connected wood trusses shall comply with ANSI/TPI 1. The truss design drawings shall be prepared by a registered professional where required by the statutes of the jurisdiction in which the project is to be constructed in accordance with Section R106.1. THE USE OF LOAD DURATION FACTORS FOR SNOW LOAD OR SLOPE OF ROOF SHALL BE PROHIBITED. (42) Section R803.2 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R803.2.1.3 Wood structural panel sheathing thickness. A MINIMUM OF 5/8 INCH PLYWOOD, PARTICLE BOARD OR WAFERWOOD SHALL BE USED ON ROOF RAFTERS OR ROOF TRUSSES SPACED 24 INCHES ON CENTER IN ANY SNOW LOAD AREA. WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL ROOF SHEATHING SHALL BE BONDED BY EXTERIOR GLUE. (43) Section R903 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R903.6 FALL PROTECTION. PERMANENT FALL PROTECTION ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION. ROOF ANCHORS OR SIMILAR DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. (44) Section R905 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 905.1.1 Ice barrier. AN ICE BARRIER THAT CONSISTS OF AN APPROVED SELF-ADHERING POLYMER MODIFIED BITUMEN SHEET SHALL BE USED IN LIEU OF NORMAL UNDERLAYMENT ON ALL SLOPED ROOFS. THIS ICE DAM PROTECTION UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE EAVES TO A POINT 6 FEET INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE OF THE BUILDING AND 24 INCHES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF ALL VALLEYS, FULLY ADHERED TO THE SUBSTRATE ON ALL HABITABLE STRUCTURES. Exception: DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAT CONTAIN NO CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. R905.1.2 Snow-shed barriers. ROOFS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SNOW FROM SHEDDING ABOVE OR IN FRONT OF GAS UTILITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY METERS. (45) Sections R905.2.7.1, R905.4.3.1, R905.5.3.1, R905.6.3.1, R905.7.3.1, R905.8.3.1 are repealed in their entirety. (46) Section R905.2.8.3 is amended by adding an exception to read as follows: R905.2.8.3 Sidewall flashing. Flashing against a vertical sidewall shall be by the step-flashing method. The flashing shall be a minimum of 4 inches (102 mm) high and 4 inches (102 mm) wide. At the end of the vertical sidewall, the step flashing shall be turned out in a manner that directs water away from the wall and onto the roof and/or gutter. EXCEPTIONS 1. SOLID FLASHING APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL (47) Section R905.4 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R905.4.7 MECHANICAL BARRIERS. MECHANICAL BARRIERS INSTALLED TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING FROM THE ROOF SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS OR TO SOLID BLOCKING SECURED TO FRAMING MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. INDIVIDUAL DEVICES INSTALLED IN A GROUP OF DEVICES TO CREATE A BARRIER TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AT LEAST TWO ROWS WITH THE FIRST ROW NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. THE ROWS SHALL BE PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE,AND THE DEVICES IN EACH ROW SHALL BE STAGGERED FOR A SPACING OF NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES ON CENTER MEASURED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE. CONTINUOUS SNOW BARRIERS SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING AT NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES ON CENTER. CONTINUOUS BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. (48) Section R905.10 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R905.10.5.1 Mechanical barriers for metal roof shingles and metal roof panels. ROOFS WITH METAL ROOF SHINGLES OR METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL BE DESIGNED SO AS TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SNOW FROM SHEDDING ONTO PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR EXITS FROM BUILDINGS AND ON TO SIDEWALKS, STREETS AND ALLEY WAYS. MECHANICAL BARRIERS INSTALLED TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING FROM THE ROOF SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS OR TO SOLID BLOCKING SECURED TO FRAMING MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. INDIVIDUAL DEVICES INSTALLED IN A GROUP OF DEVICES TO CREATE A BARRIER TO PREVENT SNOW SHEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN AT LEAST TWO ROWS WITH THE FIRST ROW NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. THE ROWS SHALL BE PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND THE DEVICES IN EACH ROW SHALL BE STAGGERED FOR A SPACING OF NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES ON CENTER MEASURED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE. CONTINUOUS SNOW BARRIERS SHALL BE SECURED TO ROOF FRAMING AT NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES ON CENTER. CONTINUOUS BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL WITH THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE AND NO MORE THAN 24 INCHES FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF OR EAVE. (49) Section R907.3 is amended to read as follows: R907.3 Recovering versus replacement. New roof coverings shall not be installed without first removing all existing layers of roof coverings where any of the following conditions exist: 1. Where the existing roof or roof covering is water-soaked or has deteriorated to the point that the existing roof or roof covering is not adequate as a base for additional roofing. 2. Where the existing roof covering is wood shake, slate, clay, cement or asbestos-cement tile. 3. Where the existing roof has twe-eF MORE THAN ONE application of any type of roof covering. 4. For asphalt shingles, when the building is located in an area subject to moderate or severe hail damage according to Figure R903.5. (50) Section R1001 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R1001.1.1 LIMITATION ON THE NUMBER. THE NUMBER OF APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES OR DEVICES WHICH MAY BE INSTALLED SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING LIMITS: 1. DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING: ONE APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE OR DEVICE PER DWELLING. 2. BUILDING WITH TWO DWELLING UNITS: ONE APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE OR DEVICE PER DWELLING UNIT, PROVIDED THAT THE DWELLING UNIT IS GREATER THAN ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (1,500) SQUARE FEET IN TOTAL LIVING AREA. 3. APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUMS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS: APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUMS, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO INSTALL ONE APPROVED SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE OR DEVICE IN A LOBBY OR OTHER COMMON AREA OF THE APARTMENT, CONDOMINIUM, OR HOTEL. ONLY AN APPROVED NONSOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE MAY BE INSTALLED WITHIN ANY APARTMENT, CONDOMINIUM OR HOTEL/MOTEL ROOM. (51) Section R1004.4 is amended to read as follows: R1004.4 Unvented gas log heaters "^ ^+^d gas peg h +^. -sti^ll ^^+ l ^ ;^-stalled 'A a faeteFy built fiFeplaee uRless the fiFeplaee system has beeR speeifleally tested, 44e_d a A P-1 .1 i_4-1;o-2.1_p-4 ith "' "'. INSTALLATION OF UNVENTED GAS LOG HEATERS IS PROHIBITED. (52) Section R1005 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: R1005.7 Factory built chimney enclosures. FACTORY-BUILT CHIMNEYS SHALL BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A CONTINUOUS ENCLOSURE PROTECTED ON THE INTERIOR (CHIMNEY)SIDE BY NOT LESS THAN 5/8-INCH TYPE-X GYPSUM WALLBOARD. JOINTS AND FASTENERS SHALL BE TAPED AND FINISHED. EXCEPTION: THE PORTION OF THE CHIMNEY LOCATED IN THE SAME ROOM AS THE APPLIANCE AND THE PORTION OF THE CHIMNEY ABOVE THE FINISHED ROOF IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED. FACTORY-BUILT CHIMNEYS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY FIREBLOCKED WITHIN SUCH ENCLOSURE AT EACH FLOOR-CEILING LEVEL AND AT THE ROOF. THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN ADJACENT FIREBLOCKING SHALL NOT EXCEED 10 FEET. (53) Section N1101.2 is amended to read as follows: N1101.2 Compliance. Compliance shall be demonstrated by either meeting the requirements of the 20061nternotionol Energy Conservation Code or meeting the requirements of this chapter. Climate zones from Figure N1101.2 or Table N1101.2 shall be used in determining the applicable requirements from this chapter. (54) Section M1414 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: M1414.1.1 Fireplace stoves. DETACHED ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS MAY HAVE NO MORE THAN ONE SOLID FUEL BURNING DEVICE PER PROPERTY. CONDOMINIUMS AND APARTMENT HOUSES MAY HAVE ONE SOLID FUEL BURNING DEVICE LOCATED IN A LOBBY OR OTHER MAIN COMMON AREA. FACTORY-BUILT FIREPLACES AND STOVES SHALL MEET E.P.A. PHASE II OR COLORADO PHASE III AIR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS. (55) Section M1415 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: M1415.1.1 Fireplace stoves. DETACHED ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS MAY HAVE NO MORE THAN ONE SOLID FUEL BURNING DEVICE PER PROPERTY. CONDOMINIUMS AND APARTMENT HOUSES MAY HAVE ONE SOLID FUEL BURNING DEVICE LOCATED IN A LOBBY OR OTHER MAIN COMMON AREA. FACTORY-BUILT FIREPLACES AND STOVES SHALL MEET E.P.A. PHASE II OR COLORADO PHASE III AIR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS. (56) Section G2404.7 is repealed in its entirety. G24944 (391,11) Flood hazard- le-eated 'R:�ee4 hGzGr4 @Feas,the , (57) Section G2406.2 in amended to read as follows: G2406.2 (303.3) Prohibited locations. Appliances shall not be located in sleeping rooms, bathrooms,toilet rooms, storage closets or surgical rooms, or in a space that opens only into such rooms or spaces, except where the installation complies with one of the following: 1. The appliance is a direct-vent appliance installed in accordance with the conditions of the listing and the manufacturer's instructions. 2. Vented room heaters, wall furnaces,vented decorative appliances, vented gas fireplaces,vented gas fireplace heaters and decorative appliances for installation in vented solid fuel-burning fireplaces are installed in rooms that meet the required volume criteria of Section G2407.5 3. i=a t!Rg Ret gFeateF thn@R 6,999 ST h Tela-ath vrnTr shall -meet the--I'^c-qr'a"rFEd I erite.ria of Seeti p GP=7 q 4. Tat!Rget-gFeatee-th@R 19,999 gtu h (2.93 14V). Theh-ed-ree-FA Shall meet the Feed 3. The appliance is installed in a room or space that opens only into a bedroom or bathroom, and such room or space is used for no other purpose and is provided with a solid weather—stripped door equipped with an approved self-closing device. All combustion air shall be taken directly from the outdoors in accordance with Section G2407.6. (58) Section G2417.4.1 is amended to read as follows: G2417.4.1 (406.4.1)Test pressure. The test pressure to be used shall not be less than one and one-half times the proposed maximum working pressure, but not less than-3 10 psig(PP We gauge), irrespective of design pressure. Where the test pressure exceeds 125 psi (862 kPa gauge), the test pressure shall not exceed a value that produces a hoop stress in the piping greater than 50 percent of the specified minimum yield strength of the pipe. (59) Section G2425.8 is amended to read as follows: G2425.8 (501.8)Appliance not required to be vented. The following appliances shall not be required to be vented: 1. Ranges. 2. Built-in domestic cooking units listed and marked for optional venting. 3. Hot plates and laundry stoves. 4. Type 1 clothes dryers(Type 1 clothes dryers shall be exhausted in accordance with the requirements of Section G2439). 5. Refrigerators. 6. Counter appliances. heur p .,H:e get(297 VV/m). Where the Fee-FA e Fspeee Is which the- ee IS 'AStelle�Ts , (60) Section G2433 (603) is amended to read as follows: G2433.1 (603.1) General. Leg lighteFs shall be tested v.glth C.-SA Q app-I shall be . mth+ti„m „fac#,,.-,is INSTALLATION OF LOG LIGHTERS IS PROHIBITED. (61) Section G2445 is amended to read as follows: G2445.1 (621.1) Geweral. PROHIBITED INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION OF UNVENTED ROOM HEATERS IS PROHIBITED. Z21-41-.-p app-I shall be with the Af the listiRg @Rpj the G2445-3 (6821-3) IRPU% Fa%ing. 9nvente-40:9-P.A4 heiGte.r&Shall Ret have @R 'Rput FatiRg IR exeessle� nn nnn ❑ 61, h (11.7 wy) c �+ ,, C-,-P G2445.6 (621-6) Oxygen deple%ion safe%y sys%em. I-I.Qvi-24i-2-40:99,pq 402oter,; shall be equipped (62) Section P2501.1 is amended to read as follows: P2501.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall establish the general administrative requirements applicable to plumbing systems and inspection requirements of This Code. THE INTENT OF THIS CODE IS TO MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PLUMBING CODE. WHEN TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS OR STANDARDS IN THE COLORADO PLUMBING CODE CONFLICT WITH THIS CODE,THE MORE RESTRICTIVE SHALL APPLY. (63) Section P2603.6.1 is amended to read as follows: P2603.6.1 Sewer depth. °.,i4iogy s +ti + ++„ r ate sewage disposal systems s II Win. Building sewers shall be a minimum of '"II ' R] 48 inches (1,219.2 mm) below grade. (64) Section P2904 is repealed in its entirety. 129904 Il..a.11i.... I L.i+ FiFe SpFiRkleF Sys% ms (65) Section P3103.1 is amended to read as follows: P3103.1 Roof extension. Open vent pipes that extend through a roof shall be terminated at ( 52 N11M) 12 INCHES above the roof, eF 6 ° eh ( 52 Fn Fn) above the tielp + � „lati ,., ,.,I,;,.I,,veF Is gFeateF, except that where a roof is to be used for any purpose other than weather protection, the vent extension shall be run at least 7 feet(2,134 mm) above the roof AND WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES OF THE PEAK OF THE ROOF. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE MUNICIPAL CODE 18-1-3 :Code Amendments: (c) The following sections of the International Plumbing Code, adopted by reference in Section 18- above, is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section 101.1 is amended to read as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the International Plumbing Code of THE TOWN OF FRASER, hereinafter referred to as This Code. (2) Section 101.3 is amended to read as follows: 101.3 Intent. The purpose of this Code is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, installation, quality of materials, location, operation and maintenance or use of plumbing equipment and systems. THE INTENT OF THIS CODE IS TO MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PLUMBING CODE. WHEN TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS OR STANDARDS IN THE COLORADO PLUMBING CODE CONFLICT WITH THIS CODE,THE MORE RESTRICTIVE SHALL APPLY. (3) Section 103.2 is amended to read as follows: 103.2 Appel BUILDING OFFICIAL. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(5� OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (4) Section 103.3 is amended to read as follows: 103.3 Deputies. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(6,. OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE (5) Section 103.4 is amended to read as follows: 103.4 Liability. SEE PARAGRAPH L8-1-30(a)(8)OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (6) Section 106.5.3 is amended to read as follows: (11) 106.5.3 Expiration. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(111 OF THE FRASER MUNCIPAL CODE. (7) Section 106.6.2 is amended to read as follows: 106.6.2 Fee schedule. The fees for plumbing work shall be as ;^,-;^ated- in the F^"^•.•;^^ IN ACCORDANCE WITH %PPENDICES BAND C OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (8) Section 106.6.3 is amended to read as follows: 106.6.3 Fee refunds. The-e c BUILDING official shall authorize the refunding of fees as follows: 1. The full amount of any fee paid hereunder that was erroneously paid or collected. 2. Not more than [SPECICV PERCENTAGE] 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with This Code. 3. Not more than [SPECICV PERCENTAGE] 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan review effort has been expended. The-e c BUILDING official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid, except upon written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. (9) Section 106.6 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 106.6.4 REINSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE, IN AN AMOUNT PER APPENDICES B AND C OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE, MAY BE ASSESSED FOR EACH INSPECTION OR REINSPECTION WHEN SUCH PORTION OF WORK FOR WHICH INSPECTION IS CALLED IS NOT COMPLETE OR WHEN CORRECTIONS CALLED FOR ARE NOT MADE. REINSPECTION FEES MAY BE ASSESSED WHEN THE INSPECTION RECORD CARD IS NOT POSTED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE ON THE WORK SITE,THE APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR, FOR FAILING TO PROVIDE ACCESS ON THE DATE FOR WHICH THE INSPECTION IS REQUESTED, OR DEVIATING FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. IN INSTANCES WHERE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN ASSESSED, NO ADDITIONAL INSPECTION OF THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. (10) Section 108.4 is amended to read as follows: 108.4 Violation penalties. Any person who shall violate a provision of this Code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter or repair plumbing work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the Ge BUILDING official, or of a permit or certification issued under the provisions of this Code, shall be guilty of a VIOLATION, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment not exceeding ONE YEAR, or both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION ' " " OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF FRASER. (11) Section 108.5 is amended to read as follows: 108.5 Stop work orders. SEE PARAGRAPH 3-1-30(d)(10) OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (12) Section 305.6.1 is amended to read as follows: 305.6.1 Sewer depth. Suild;^^sewe.rs that^ eet to p ate sewage dispesal systems shall he Building sewers shall be a minimum of [N " R] 48 inches (1,219.2 mm) below grade. (13) Section 701.2 is amended to read as follows: 701.2 Sewer required. Every building in which plumbing fixtures are installed and all premises having drainage piping shall be connected to a public sewer. v.;he.re available, eF ^;,^^' Eec�e- EXCEPTION: WHEN APPROVED BY BOARD OF TRUSTEES. (14) Section 904.1 is amended to read as follows: 904.1 Roof extension. All open vent pipes that extend through a roof shall be terminated at least [NWN1 SER] 12 inches (304.8 mm) above the roof, except that where a roof is to used for any purpose other than weather protection,the vent extensions shall be run at least 7 feet (2,134 mm) above the roof. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (d) The following sections of the International Mechanical Code, adopted by reference in Municipal Code Section 18-1-10 hereof, is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section 101.1 is amended to read as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Mechanical Code of THE TOWN OF FRASER, herein after referred to as "this Code." (2) Section 103.2 is amended to read as follows: 103.2 Appoin%ment BUILDING OFFICIAL. The buildiRg ^ff;rs;a' shall he a Rted by the Ghlef ^;Rt;Rg auth^.;+.,of the ;6i4&4k-t4.THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO ENFORCE ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE; HOWEVER,A GUARANTEE THAT ALL BUILDING AND STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. (3) SECTION 103.3 IS AMENDED TO READ AS follows: 103.3 Deputies. In accordance with the prescribed procedures of this jurisdiction, ae eeReuFFeRee ^f the appe'Rt'Rg autheF;+.,the-e E BUILDING official shall have the authority to appoint a deputy-e c BUILDING official, other related technical officers, inspectors and other employees. Such employees shall have the powers as delegated by the-G c BUILDING official. (4) Section 103.4 is amended to read as follows: 103.4 Liability. THE ADOPTION OF THIS CODE,AND ANY PREVIOUS BUILDING CODES ADOPTED BY THE TOWN OF FRASER, SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO GIVE RISE TO A DUTY OF CARE ON THE PART OF ANY PUBLIC ENTITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT, NOR SHALL THIS CODE OR ANY PREVIOUS BUILDING CODES BE DEEMED TO CREATE ANY CIVIL REMEDY AGAINST A PUBLIC ENTITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT.The-e c BUILDING official, member of board of appeals or employee charged with the enforcement of this Code, while acting for the jurisdiction in good faith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by this Code or other pertinent law or ordinance, shall not thereby be rendered liable personally and is hereby relieved from personal liability for any damages accruing to persons or property as a result of any act or by reason of an act or omission in the discharge of official duties. Any suit instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officer or employee in the lawful discharge of duties under the provisions of this Code shall be defended by legal representative of the jurisdiction until the final termination of the proceedings. The -e�BUILDING official or any subordinate shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit or proceeding that is instituted in pursuance of the provisions of This Code. (5) Section 106.4.3 is amended to read as follows: 106.4.3 Expiration. EVERY PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UNDER THE PROVISION OF THIS CODE SHALL EXPIRE 24 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUE. Every permit issued by the-e c BUILDING official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work recommences, a new permit shall first be obtained and the fee therefor shall be one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided that no changes have been made or will be made in the original construction documents for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. THE EXTENSION SHALL BE REQUESTED IN WRITING AND JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE DEMONSTRATED. (6) Section 106.5.2 is amended to read as follows: 106.5.2 Fee schedule. The fees for mechanical work shall be as ;^,-;^ated- in the fe-11W.•;^9 IN ACCORDANCE WITH kPPENDICES BAND C OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (7) Section 106.5.3 is amended to read as follows: 106.5.3 Fee refunds. The-e c BUILDING official shall authorize the refunding of fees as follows: 1. The full amount of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected. 2. Not more than [corr14 ororrniTAGEJ 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with This Code. 3. Not more than [corr14 ororrniTAGEJ 80 percent of the plan review fee when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan review effort has been expended. The-e c BUILDING official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid, except upon written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. (8) Section 106.5 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 106.5.4 REINSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE,AMOUNT PER_ ,PPENDICES B AND C OF THE GRACPR am iruirmAi rnnG, MAY BE ASSESSED FOR EACH INSPECTION OR REINSPECTION WHEN SUCH PORTION OF WORK FOR WHICH INSPECTION IS CALLED IS NOT COMPLETE OR WHEN CORRECTIONS CALLED FOR ARE NOT MADE. REINSPECTION FEES MAY BE ASSESSED WHEN THE INSPECTION RECORD CARD IS NOT POSTED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE ON THE WORK SITE,THE APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR, FOR FAILING TO PROVIDE ACCESS ON THE DATE FOR WHICH THE INSPECTION IS REQUESTED, OR DEVIATING FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. IN INSTANCES WHERE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN ASSESSED, NO ADDITIONAL INSPECTION OF THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. (9) Section 108.4 is amended to read as follows: 108.4 Violation penalties. Any person who shall violate a provision of This Code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter or repair mechanical work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the Ge BUILDING official, or of a permit or certification issued under the provisions of This Code, shall be guilty of a VIOLATION, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 dollars or by imprisonment not exceeding ONE YEAR, or both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 18-1-40 OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (10) Section 108.5 is amended to read as follows: 108.5 Stop work orders. Upon notice from the-e c BUILDING official that mechanical work is being done contrary to the provisions of this Code or in a dangerous or unsafe manner, such work shall immediately cease. Such notice shall be in writing and shall be given to the owner of the property,to the owner's agent or to the person doing the work. The notice shall state the conditions under which work is authorized to resume. Where an emergency exists, the Ge BUILDING official shall not be required to give a written notice prior to stopping the work. AA} (11) Section 109 is amended to read as follows: 109.1 Application for appeal. A person shall have the right to appeal a decision of the 694e BUILDING official OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL to the CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS ESTABLISHED IN PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(21) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF FRASER be @Fd of a^^ An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of this Code or the rules legally adopted thereunder have been incorrectly interpreted,the provisions of this Code do not fully apply, or an equally good or better form of construction is proposed. The application shall be filed on a form obtained from the-e c BUILDING OR FIRE CODE official within 20 days after the notice was served. NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FEE OF$250.00. (12) Section 903.3 is repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows. 903.3 Unvented gas log heaters. AR Rted gas leg heater shall Ret be faeteFy flFeplaee the fiFeplaee system has beeR speeifleally tested, 4ste4 Gn-d.11-4-1;1-2.11-2-d f A_F 5;---.e aeee—rdapee v ;ith "' "'. UNVENTED GAS LOG HEATERS ARE PROHIBITED. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE (d) The following sections of the International Fuel Gas Code, adopted by reference in Section above, is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section 101.1 is amended to read as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Fuel Gas Code of THE TOWN OF FRASER, herein referred to as "this Code." (2) Section 103.2 is amended to read as follows: 103.2 Appoin%ment BUILDING OFFICIAL. The eerie effie;al shall be a Rted by the ehief appe'Rt'Rg auth^.;+.,of the uFisdieti^^ THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO ENFORCE ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE; HOWEVER,A GUARANTY THAT ALL BUILDING AND STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE IS NEITHER INTENDED NOR IMPLIED. (3) Section 103.3 is amended to read as follows: 103.3 Deputies. In accordance with the prescribed procedures of this jurisdiction, ae eeReuFFeRee ^f the appe'Rt'Rg autheFitythe e�BUILDING official shall have the authority to appoint a deputy-e c BUILDING official, other related technical officers, inspectors and other employees. Such employees shall have the powers as delegated by the-G c BUILDING official. (4) Section 103.4 is amended to read as follows: 103.4 Liability. THE ADOPTION OF THIS CODE,AND ANY PREVIOUS BUILDING CODES ADOPTED BY THE TOWN OF FRASER, SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO GIVE RISE TO A DUTY OF CARE ON THE PART OF ANY PUBLIC ENTITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT, NOR SHALL THIS CODE OR ANY PREVIOUS BUILDING CODES BE DEEMED TO CREATE ANY CIVIL REMEDY AGAINST A PUBLIC ENTITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT.The-e c BUILDING official, member of board of appeals or employee charged with the enforcement of this Code, while acting for the jurisdiction in good faith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by this Code or other pertinent law or ordinance, shall not thereby be rendered liable personally, and is hereby relieved from personal liability for any damages accruing to persons or property as a result of an act or by reason of an act or omission in the discharge of official duties. Any suit instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officer or employee in the lawful discharge of duties under the provisions of this Code shall be defended by legal representative of the jurisdiction until the final termination of the proceedings. The -e�BUILDING official or any subordinate shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit or proceeding that is instituted in pursuance of the provisions of this Code. (5) Section 106.4.3 is amended to read as follows: 106.4.3 Expiration. EVERY PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UNDER THE PROVISION OF THIS CODE SHALL EXPIRE 24 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUE. Every permit issued by the-e c BUILDING official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work recommences, a new permit shall be first obtained and the fee therefor shall be one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided that no changes have been made or will be made in the original construction documents for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. THE EXTENSION SHALL BE REQUESTED IN WRITING AND JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE DEMONSTRATED. (6) Section 106.6.2 is amended to read as follows: 106.6.2 Fee schedule. The fees for work shall be a s the{^"^ • ^^sehedu'^ IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDICES B AND C OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (7) Section 106.6.3 is amended to read as follows: 106.6.3 Fee refunds. The-e c BUILDING official shall authorize the refunding of fees as follows: 1. The full amount of any fee paid hereunder that was erroneously paid or collected. 2. Not more than [SPECICV PERCENTAGE] 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with This Code. 3. Not more than [SPECICV PERCENTAGE] 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan review effort has been expended. The-e c BUILDING official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid, except upon written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. (8) Section 107.2 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 107.2.1.1 REINSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE,AS SPECIFIED IN APPENDIX B OF THE FRASER rim irwrmm rnnr, MAY BE ASSESSED FOR EACH INSPECTION OR REINSPECTION WHEN SUCH PORTION OF WORK FOR WHICH INSPECTIONS IS CALLED IS NOT COMPLETE OR WHEN CORRECTIONS CALLED FOR ARE NOT MADE. REINSPECTION FEES MAY BE ASSESSED WHEN THE INSPECTION RECORD CARD IS NOT POSTED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE ON THE WORK SITE,THE APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR, FOR FAILING TO PROVIDE ACCESS ON THE DATE FOR WHICH THE INSPECTION IS REQUESTED, OR FOR DEVIATING FROM PLANS REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IN INSTANCES WHERE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN ASSESSED, NO ADDITIONAL INSPECTION OF WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN COLLECTED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. (9) Section 108.4 is amended to read as follows: 108.4 Violation penalties. Any person who shall violate a provision of this Code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or erect, install, alter or repair work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the-e E BUILDING official, or of a permit or certification issued under the provisions of this Code, shall be guilty of a VIOLATION, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment not exceeding ONE YEAR, or both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE (10) Section 108.5 is amended to read as follows: 108.5 Stop work orders. Upon notice from the-e�BUILDING official that work is being done contrary to the provisions of this Code or in a dangerous or unsafe manner, such work shall immediately cease. Such notice shall be in writing and shall be given to the owner of the property,the owner's agent or the person doing the work. The notice shall state the conditions under which work is authorized to resume. Where an emergency exists, the Ge BUILDING official shall not be required to give a written notice prior to stopping the work. ARy peFseR w"^ shall eeptipue @Ry weFk eR the system @4eF haviRg beep served with a step weFk eFdeF, exeep-t be liah-le f.,. a fiRe of Ret less+h@R [AN11C) NT-] A- me.re +heR rnnnnl NT-] dollars (11) Section 109 is repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows: SECTION 109 BOARD OF APPEALS 109.1 Application for appeal. A person shall have the right to appeal a decision of the EG4& BUILDING official to the CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF ADDFAI c FSTARI KZHED IN PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(21) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF FRASER. be @Fd of @ppea 4An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of this Code or the rules legally adopted thereunder have been incorrectly interpreted,the provisions of this Code do not fully apply, or an equally good or better form of construction is proposed. The application shall be filed on a form obtained from the-e c BUILDING official within 20 days after the notice was served. NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FEE OF$250.00. (12) Section 303.3 is amended to read as follows: 303.3 Prohibited locations. Appliances shall not be located in sleeping rooms, bathrooms,toilet rooms, storage closets or surgical rooms, or in a space that opens only into such rooms or spaces, except where the installation complies with one of the following: 1. The appliance is a direct-vent appliance installed in accordance with the conditions of the listing and the manufacturer's instructions. 2. Vented room heaters, wall furnaces,vented decorative appliances, vented gas fireplaces, vented gas fireplace heaters and decorative appliances for installation in vented solid fuel-burning fireplaces are installed in rooms that meet the required volume criteria of Section 304.5 .+ . c RetgFeateFthaR 19,999 STW�h (2.93 kW). The bedree-FA Shall meetthe Feguireelvel-ime .+ . c 3. The appliance is installed in a room or space that opens only into a bedroom or bathroom, and such room or space is used for no other purpose and is provided with a solid weather—stripped door equipped with an approved self-closing device. All combustion air shall be taken directly from the outdoors in accordance with Section 304.6. (13) Section 406.4.1 is amended to read as follows: 406.4.1 Test Pressure. The test pressure to be used shall not be no less 1%times the proposed maximum working pressure, but not less than 3 (29 kPa gau&_` 10 PSIG, irrespective of design pressure. Where the test pressure exceeds 125 psig (862 kPa gauge),the test pressure shall not exceed a value that produces a hoop stress in the piping greater than 50 percent of the specified minimum yield strength of the pipe. (14) Section 501.8 is amended to read as follows: 501.8 Appliances not required to be vented. The following appliances shall not be required to be vented: 1. Ranges. 2. Built-in domestic cooking units listed and marked for optional venting. 3. Hot plates and laundry stoves. 4. Type 1 clothes dryers. (Type 1 clothes dryers shall be exhausted in accordance with the requirements of Section 614.) 5. A single booster type automatic instantaneous water heater, where designed and used solely for the sanitizing rinse requirements of a dishwashing machine, provided that the heater is installed in a commercial kitchen having a mechanical exhaust system. Where installed in this manner, the draft hood is required, shall be in place and unaltered and the draft hood outlet shall be not less than 36 inches (914 mm)vertically and 6 inches (152 mm) horizontally from any surface other than the heater. 6. Refrigerators. 7. Counter appliances. -98. Direct-fired make-up air heaters. 489. Other equipment listed for unvented use and not provided with flue collars. -1410. Specialized equipment of limited input such as laboratory burners and gas lights. the aggFegate !Rput Fat'Rg exeeeds _2Q_ _R.ritish The.rmal WRits (Stu) peF heuF peF euble feet (297 acts p m) of yeI��me of the .,hieh � eh -, pIianee� a installed,watts Win. ..... .. Pipe,; Inlet exr-ped. the 29 Stu peF heuF peF euble feet (297 watts peF m). Where the (15) Section 603.1 is amended to read as follows: 603.1 General. Log lighters Shall be to-ste d ; ^. with GSA Q apel he err- R .^vimth the.. „fae#--r +,��,+;^. +; ARE PROHIBITED. (16) Section 621.1 is repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows: 621.1 Geweral PROHIBITED INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION OF UNVENTED ROOM HEATERS IS PROHIBITED. Ave—Ated . FA h +^.s shall be tested v.glth ANSI Z21-41-.-p app-I 4:---gulated by the AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (e) The following sections of the International Fire Code, adopted by reference in Section 18-1-10 of this Chapter, is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section 101.1 is amended to read as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Fire Code of THE TOWN OF FRASER, hereinafter referred to as "this Code." (2) Section 101.2.1 is amended to read as follows: 101.2.1 Appendices. Preyi-sie— S 'A the - .,glees shall ^^+apply u .,less s eifleally adep e4 PROVISIONS IN THE APPENDICES ARE SPECIFICALLY ADOPTED. (3) Section 103.2 is amended to read as follows: 103.2 Appointment. BUILDING AND OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. SEE PARAGRAPH i-1-30(a)(5) OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (4) Section 103.3 is amended to read as follows: 103.3 Deputies. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(6; OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (5) Section 103.4 is amended to read as follows: 103.4 Liability. SEE PARAGRAPH ,8-1-30(a)(8) OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (6) Section 105.3.1 is amended to read as follows: 105.3.1 Expiration. SEE PARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(11)OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. (7) Section 106.2 is amended by adding a new subsection to read as follows: 106.2.1.1 REINSPECTIONS. A REINSPECTION FEE,AS SPECIFIED IN APPENDIX B OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CGS , MAY BE ASSESSED FOR EACH INSPECTION OR REINSPECTION WHEN SUCH PORTION OF WORK FOR WHICH INSPECTIONS IS CALLED IS NOT COMPLETE OR WHEN CORRECTIONS CALLED FOR ARE NOT MADE. REINSPECTION FEES MAY BE ASSESSED WHEN THE INSPECTION RECORD CARD IS NOT POSTED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE ON THE WORK SITE,THE APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR, FOR FAILING TO PROVIDE ACCESS ON THE DATE FOR WHICH THE INSPECTION IS REQUESTED, OR FOR DEVIATING FROM PLANS REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND/OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. IN INSTANCES WHERE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN ASSESSED, NO ADDITIONAL INSPECTION OF WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE REINSPECTION FEES HAVE BEEN COLLECTED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OR FIRE DEPARTMENT. (FIRE DEPARTMENT- EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.4, PLAN REVIEW& INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE) (7) Section 108 is repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows: 108.1 BOARD OF APPEALS ESTABLISHED. A PERSON SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND FIRE CODE OFFICIAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO DARAGRAPH 18-1-30(a)(21 OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE. NOTICE OF APPEAL SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A FEE OF$250.00. (8) Section 114 IS added to read as follows: 114 WATER FLUSHING. THE FIRE CHIEF OR FIRE CODE OFFICIAL SHALL BE AUTHORIZED TO WITNESS, ACCEPT OR APPROVE FLUSHING AND FLOW TESTING OF A WATER SYSTEM SUPPLYING WATER FOR ALL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS. (9) The limits referred to in certain sections of the 2009 International Fire Code are hereby established as follows: Section 3204.3.1.1.3 Location. of Shall ^^+ be leeated v.glth;^ pliked etheF ha-zarde,; .,.,ate ials ANY AMOUNT OF STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE CRYOGENIC FLUIDS IS PROHIBITED. Section 3404.2.9.6.1 Locations where above-ground tanks are prohibited. SteFage of G! estate-lishe d by yaw as the l;. it-s of di-str;e+S ; v.;hir_-h _,;,Heh steFage Is ehibited. STORAGE OF CLASS I AND CLASS II LIQUIDS IN ABOVE GROUND TANKS OUTSIDE OF BUILDINGS IS RESTRICTED TO 250 GALLONS OR LESS. EXCEPTION:WHEN A PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE FIRE CHIEF. Section 3406.2.4.4 Locations where above-ground tanks are prohibited. SteFage ^{ app' estate-lishe d by yaw as the l;. it-s of di-str;e+S ; v.;hir_-h _,;,Heh steFage Is ehibited. STORAGE OF CLASS I AND CLASS II LIQUIDS IN ABOVE GROUND TANKS IS RESTRICTED TO 250 GALLONS OR LESS. EXCEPTION:WHEN A PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE FIRE CHIEF. Section 3506.2. Limitations. SteF ge effl-,w,mable eFyegeRie fluids ; stab,,. @Fy .,+-,;Appr, 'Ate-FRatie-R,i Pire Cede A-., page xiii ANY AMOUNT OF STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE CRYOGENIC FLUIDS IS PROHIBITED. Section 3804.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. `4ithi.,the .1i it-s „-stah-li-shed by of 2,999 gall Rs (7579L). STORAGE OF LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS IS RESTRICTED TO 2,000 GALLONS OR LESS. (10) Section A101.2 is amended to read as follows: A101.2 MEMBERSHIP. The membership of the APPEALS board shall consist of five voting members,THREE OF WHICH having the qualifications established by this section. Members shall be nominated by the BUILDING OFFICIAL,fire code official or the chief administrative officer of the RESPECTIVE jurisdiction, subject to confirmation by a majority vote of the governing body. 54l„w,h,,,._ Shell Se.rve ;+ti „+ . +; ,, eempeRsatieR, Rd Shall be A101.2.2 FIR Ea PRQTEG-T.1 1N reNIGInirroinir_ PRO 9 Elm 10-NA1 QA FAe_FAh- ,9-1;ha be 961@ f 4 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WITH ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE OR AN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR WITH AT LEAST TEN YEARS EXPERIENCE, FIVE OF WHICH SHALL HAVE BEEN IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF WORK. A101.2.3 lRd-u-stri ll safe%y „cession l be isteFe safety. REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WITH MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING EXPERIENCE OR A MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR WITH AT LEAST TEN YEARS EXPERIENCE, FIVE OF WHICH SHALL HAVE BEEN IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF WORK. (12) Section D102.1 is amended to read as follows: D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with asphalt, concrete, or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 84,000 75,999 pounds (34 959 kg). Dates need to be updated READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS 1st DAY OF AUGUST, 2007. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN Votes opposed: OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: BY: Peggy Smith, Mayor ATTEST: Lu Berger, Town Clerk ( SEAL ) EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 4 P.O. Box 2967 • Winter Park, Colorado 80482 (970) 726-5824 • Fax (970)726-5938 •www.eastgrandfire.com Mr. Howland, East Grand Fire Protection District is requesting that as Building Official, you recommend and offer to the Town Councils and or Town Board of Directors for their consideration, the adoption of the 2009 International Codes. Sincerely, Dennis K. Soles Fire Code Official East Grand Fire Protection District X kre O R A D O Town Board Briefing May 15, 2013 Please note that Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. at the Fraser Town Hall. While the regular meeting begins at 7:00pm, we will have two topic workshop beginning at 6:00pm. The workshop will provide an informal opportunity to chat with our Building Official and our Auditor in advance of Town Board consideration of these matters. The Building Code amendments will be scheduled for consideration at a future meeting pending publication of proper notice. Background materials are included in your packet for all agenda items except Ordinance 406. Given my new role on the 911 Authority Board of Directors, and some work we are undertaking on financial matters, what seemed a logical part of our Town Code suddenly presented itself as greatly outdated. The 911 Authority operates via powers granted via State Statute, not an intergovernmental agreement. 911 revenues have been collected by the 911 Authority (not the Town of Fraser) for many years pursuant to approval granted by the Public Utilities Commission. And, notably the rate is currently $1.50 rather than the $.50 referenced in our code. While this is all outdated, is has not posed any problems as the 911 Authority powers and collections are not rooted in the Fraser Town Code. Also included in your packet for your reference are the per-application materials submitted for consideration of RAMP Funding. This program provides an opportunity to fill in the gaps of various intersection improvement projects and bring CDOT funds to the community. We'll keep you apprised. As always, feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Jeff Durbin Town of Fraser PO Box 370,Fraser,CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES DATE: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 MEETING: Board of Trustees Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT Board: Mayor Peggy Smith; Mayor Pro-Tem Steve Sumrall; Trustees; Philip Naill, Eileen Waldow, Vesta Shapiro, Cheri Sanders and Adam Cwiklin Staff: Town Manager Jeff Durbin; Town Clerk, Lu Berger; Finance Manager Nat Havens; Public Works Director Allen Nordin; Town Planner, Catherine Trotter; Police Chief, Glen Trainor, Special Counsel Boots Ferguson and Kylie Crandall Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. 1. Regular Meeting: Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda: Trustee Sanders moved, and Trustee Naill seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 7-0. 3. Executive Session: For a conference with Special Counsel for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b) and for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) regarding Byers Peak Ranch and to include Special Counsel Ferguson and Crandall, Town Manager Durbin, Town Clerk Berger, Public Works Director Nordin, Planner Trotter and Finance Manager Havens. Open: 5:37 p.m. Trustee Naill moved, and Trustee Sumrall seconded the motion to enter into executive session. Motion carried: 7-0. Exit: 6:30 p.m. Trustee Sanders moved, and Trustee Sumrall seconded the motion to exit executive session. Motion carried: 7-0. Attorney's Opinion Required by C.R.S. 24-6-402(2)(d.5)(II)(B). As the attorney representing the Town of Fraser, I am of the opinion that the entire Executive Session, which was not recorded, constituted a privileged attorney-client communication. Page 2 of 3 Boots Ferguson, Special Attorney 4. Consent Agenda: a) Minutes—April 17 & 24, 2013 Trustee Shapiro moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda. Motion carried: 7-0. 5. Open Forum: 6. Updates: a) United States Forest Service Update— Forest Service staff, Craig McGuire, Reid Armstrong and Matthew Paciorek briefed the Board and public on their current programs. 7. Public Hearings: a) Byers Peak Ranch I. Petition for Annexation for Byers Peak Ranch for the Annexation of Territory to the Town of Fraser; II. Approval of Byers Peak Ranch Annexation and Development Agreement; III. Application for an Amendment to the Official Zone Map for PDD Zoning and Approval of PDD Plan for Byers Peak Ranch IV. Application for Approval of Vested Rights as set forth in the Annexation Agreement; V. Application for Approval of Development Permit for Colorado Adventure Park; VI. Application for Approval of a Subdivision Exemption; VII. Approval of Amendments to Service Plan for the West Mountain Metropolitan District. VIII. Approval of Grading and Excavations Plan Open: 7:20 Trustee Sumrall moved, and Trustee Naill seconded the motion to open the public hearing on Byers Peak Ranch. Motion carried: 7-0. The applicant, Byers Peak Ranch Properties, Clark Lipscomb addressed the Board on his proposed annexation agreement. Ramsey and Jack Bestall outlined the proposal for the Board and public. TM Durbin presented a Power Point presentation outlining the proposed annexation agreement and related documents. Exit: 10:20 Page 3 of 3 Trustee Naill moved, and Trustee Shapiro seconded the motion to continue the public hearing on Byers Peak Ranch until May 29, 2013. Motion carried: 7-0. 8. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding: 9. Community Reports: 10. Other Business: Trustee Shapiro moved, and Trustee seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 7-0. Meeting adjourned at 10:23 p.m. Lu Berger, Town Clerk Q. D • ® O to a' 3 -Z-r'0 __ O p tD M T Cm °" ° C pt O rr MI,m a & �a =a tD fOD 0. O n ice ,° O O O Gpi O M to ® O C(I) �G 3 = y y 0 Z _. " ID M tea°, � ?� �; a ° 0, �-0 ID .� cD trta. p cc a ao 0 t�D• �• -0 ate, � -� � �' � cQQo to CL � � � ' y � tv � 03 �, V*0 MMM0nt° 0 C c O =. Z) O �._ C r* CO) CD -, tC =. 5 a —q O O �+ `� -" % CO) 0 -v O D 3 0. a " a o Z < c � y - W� W -� O 0 yam_ (D 0) 0 RI r CL ;r -1 m G) 0 CL 0 (D lD t1 .� 0) ss (D. O Ct M 0 �+ C1 v I 5 n CL.per tD St W cn D O Q ,Or Q: 0 M M t�D m y O � 0 y � O � M � N 0 7 01 O = O QO Q (D CL 3 Z C D 0 M N -I 0 !y '* CD' U) O C t!! D y `0 � N y 0 0 CD p N 0 (F2. O t� 0 (c 111 CO) ss _. tD O Cl) y = a- 1") tD D Q. N c 'a 0 CA F tD 3 Z. y CD '�-". Q C O '= 0 G) O. O = 0 0 M 0. 0) 0 N O Q' 0, O y tD tyA D O tD :r 2) y 0. OJ rt O M O .' s. CD (DD - Q =� ;- -1 tD _ $ 3 (D y 0 O V C n S . * IU O� Q. Ct M = 7 = 0 lz LZ �S c4 A4S 2N. V\l CA el*k C --gyp z n a � y n ic cn cn c} TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT 2011 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR REGULATORY FLOODPLAINS IN COLORADO September 12, 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In November 2010,the Colorado Water Conservation Board established new statewide floodplain rules (Rules)that apply to all geographic areas in Colorado. The Rules became effective on January 14, 2011 and established new minimum standards for certain floodplain management activities in excess of those required by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Several important requirements are contained in the Rules including, but not limited to,the following floodplain management standards that exceed NFIP minimum standards: • One foot of freeboard shall be provided to all new and substantially changed structures in 100- year floodplains,with the exception of critical facilities; • Two feet of freeboard shall be provided to all new and substantially changed critical facilities(as defined in the rules) in 100-year floodplains; • In areas with base flood elevations defined,floodway surcharge criteria shall be reduced to 0.5 feet(from 1.0 feet)for all new studies begun after January 14,2011. Exceptions to this requirement exist and are discussed in the rules as well as this document. The process for determining floodways and regulations associated with the floodways remain unchanged; and • Communities shall regulate areas construction in areas removed from FEMA's regulatory floodplain through a LOMR Based on Fill by requiring require new and substantially improved structures built on these lands to maintain a lowest floor one foot above the base flood elevation,consistent with development in other regulatory floodplains; The purpose of this guidance document is to provide information on the intent and objective of the Rules as well as to clarify areas of ambiguity.The Rules should not be used as a justification for excessive regulation without proper local promulgation. Local governments should update, adopt,and enforce their own local ordinances to stay in compliance with the Rules. It is important to note that both the NFIP and the CWCB have always encouraged and recognized voluntary higher standards by local governments. Communities may, at their sole discretion,adopt ordinances that go beyond state and federal standards.The CWCB can assist local governments with technical information and support regarding higher standards that may be in the best interest of the community and its citizens. As stated in the Rules,communities have a three year grace period (through January 14, 2014)to update their local ordinances to be consistent with the new minimum requirements.The CWCB will work closely with communities on a case-by-case basis to provide guidance and ordinance update assistance as needed. Staff will gladly assist with assessment of alleged violations and will work with local officials to come up with reasonable remedies and correction measures on a case-by-case basis. 1 General Statements Although the Rules present higher standards than those set forth as minimums standards in the NFIP, they become the effective minimum standards for Colorado (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60.1). This guidance document is also intended to address issues relating to the adoption and implementation of higher standards outlined in the Rules. It is outside of the scope of this document to provide technical assistance for regular standards of the NFIP. For help in administering or complying with NFIP regulations, please contact the CWCB or FEMA for assistance or a list of resource documents. This is a guidance document only,and is not meant to be regulatory in nature. As such, if any statements made in this document are found to be in conflict with the Rules,then the language and associated intent of the Rules shall take precedence. Regarding Rule 3."Purpose and Scope" It is emphasized that the Rules apply to all State of Colorado(State) agencies as well as federal projects that are fully or partially financed using State funds. All activities conducted by State agencies must meet the criteria contained in the Rules,whether taking place on state, local,or private lands. No State agencies are exempt from the Rules, unless otherwise codified through statutory exemptions on a case- by-case basis. State agencies are strongly encouraged to meet all local regulations,and are requested to self-enforce the Rules. Regarding Rule 5."Regulatory Floodplain" It is emphasized that for all purposes,the Rules refer to the 100-year floodplain (1%chance floodplain) as the minimum standard for regulation. There is no CWCB requirement, under any circumstance,for the 500-year floodplain (0.2%chance floodplain)to be used for local regulation. Local decisions to implement wise higher standards,such as a 500-year floodplain standard,are voluntary in nature and the CWCB provides no incentives or disincentives to do so.The 100-year floodplain is consistent with the minimum standards of the NFIP. One of the provisions in the Rules that exceed the NFIP minimum standard is the requirement for new and substantially changed structures on land removed from the 100-year floodplain by a LOMR Based on Fill (LOMR-F)to be elevated one foot above the base flood elevation. While this provision is specifically addressed in Rule 11(c),the language in Rule 5 specifies that a land area removed by FEMA through the LOMB-F process should still be regulated as if it were still in the previously designated floodplain. The intent of this rule is only to regulate development in areas removed from the 100-year floodplain as it pertains to lowest floor elevations as outlined in Rule 11(c). It is not the intent of this rule to apply all other floodplain regulations to these areas. Substantial changes as defined in the rules generally include substantially damaged and substantially improved structures as defined in the NFIP. Regarding Rule 6. "Critical Facilities" It is emphasized that the Rules do not prohibit the placement of critical facilities in the regulatory floodplain. Also,while this rule does encourage local governments to regulate critical facilities within an identified 500-year floodplain,there is no CWCB mandate to either develop 500-year floodplain mapping or to regulate anything within an established 500-year floodplain. The only requirement that results from having a structure or facility labeled as a "critical facility" is that the lowest floor of the structure (or level of protection for a non-structure)should be elevated or 2 floodproofed to two feet above the base flood elevation, rather than one foot above the base flood elevation. No additional requirements or regulations apply as a result of the critical facility determination. Significant latitude is provided to local governments in the determination of whether a proposed land use constitutes a critical facility. As stated in this rule, any"gray area"scenario is up to the discretion of the local government as long as it meets the stated spirit and intent of this rule. While it is impossible to anticipate all circumstances that may arise,the CWCB believes that its intent is clearly stated by the language and examples provided in this rule. CWCB staff will provide technical assistance to any communities requesting help with a determination of whether a proposed structure should be designated as a "critical facility". Local jurisdictions are not required by this rule to develop a list of critical facilities within their community. It is up to each community to determine how to address this rule, but the CWCB recommends to simply add the critical facility determination as a checkoff item to the regular permitting process. A question such as "Does the proposed use of this project constitute a critical facility as outlined in this ordinance?" could be added. If this question is answered yes,then two feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation should be provided in the proposed design. If the question is answered no,then the regular one foot of freeboard may be provided. This rule is not intended to be retroactive. However,substantial changes may require the need to retrofit previously constructed facilities. This substantial change process is not new to the Rules,and has always been in place as a minimum requirement of the NFIP. As has always been the case,the process of determining substantial changes is left to local governments, and there is no need to alter the current local process as a result of this rule. While this rule sets criteria for certain land uses, it is not intended to prescribe local procedures. Finally, one community has suggested that a way to circumvent the need for a critical facilities section in their ordinance is to require two feet of freeboard community-wide in place of the one-foot freeboard required in these rules. Because the only additional regulation in these rules associated with a critical facility designation is an additional foot of freeboard,this would suffice to meet the intent and requirements of the critical facilities ordinance. While it wasn't the intent of the CWCB to encourage this,CWCB staff nonetheless agrees that if a two-foot freeboard was applied communitywide, it would nullify the need to have a critical facilities provision in the local ordinance. Regarding Rule 7."Standards for Delineation of Regulatory Floodplain Information" The intent of this rule is to provide technical criteria for mapping regulatory floodplains. The required standards of this rule are intended to be synonymous with FEMA's mapping program. Regarding Rule 8."Standards for Regulatory Floodways" Floodway provisions have existed for decades in NFIP regulations. This rule does not change any regulations associated with floodways, but does create a higher standard (lower surcharge)for the identification of floodways when new studies occur. It is emphasized that this rule does not prohibit any activities in the regulatory floodway,as has always been the case in NFIP and CWCB regulations. Certain operations can and do occur in existing floodway areas in a viable way. The only additional regulation for floodways (in addition to standard floodplain regulations,which apply to all areas of the regulatory floodplain, including the floodway) is the 3 requirement for a no-rise certification,which prohibits increases in flood elevations due to activities within the floodway. This no-rise requirement for floodway activities has always been present within NFIP regulations. The primary purpose of the floodway requirement is not just protection of the subject development itself, but also to place a limit on the negative effects of the subject development that are pushed off onto neighboring properties. Some discussion regarding the surcharge criteria is needed to frame this guidance. According to the definition for Regulatory Floodway found in 44 CFR Part 59.1,a regulatory floodway means: "the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height" (emphasis added). The CWCB definition is synonymous with this federal definition. An important point to be taken from this wording is that the increase to the water surface elevation is not necessarily equal to the designated height, but can never be more than the designated height. Because cross-sections can vary greatly,even within a reach,the computed floodway is often extremely erratic over short stretches, which makes mapping and regulation challenging. A common technique is to"smooth out"the floodway to a more consistent shape that is more effective for regulation. By definition,the floodway surcharge can never be more than the designated height, but it can be less. This means that in a typical portrayal of a floodway,some of the sections in a reach will contain the maximum surcharge, but some will also show a surcharge less than the designated height, in some cases much less. Examination of a floodway table in most Flood Insurance Studies will show this in real world examples. For example, if the designated height is one foot, as has been FEMA's minimum standard for decades, a sample reach containing 5 cross sections, may show one section with a surcharge of 1.0',one section with a surcharge of 0.9',one section with a surcharge of 0.5',one section with a surcharge of 0.3', and one section with a surcharge of 0.1'. When this reach is shown on the corresponding FIRM, a floodway of relatively consistent width and shape is portrayed. If the sample reach discussed above were to be restudied,three of the hydraulic model sections (0.5', 0.3' and 0.1'surcharges)would meet the new criteria, but two of the sections (1.0' and 0.9' surcharges) would need to have a floodway revision to be consistent with the new statewide rules. It may be possible to re-delineate the floodway with just these two sections revised and still meet FEMA mapping practices for floodway delineation. It is therefore possible that the remaining three sections would not need to be revised. However, if the revised floodway needs to be"smoothed out", it is also possible that some or all of the remaining three sections would need to be revised,even though they have already met the new criteria. The Rules require that for all newly studied reaches,the designated floodway surcharge(height) is reduced to 0.5'. An exemption is available for any studies that result in a change that results in a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)to previously mapped floodway delineation, as defined in the rules. In other words, LOMR submittals are deliberately exempted from the new floodway criteria as an effort in preventing"patchwork floodways". This means that new studies that begin after the effective date of the Rules that result in any of the following should use the new criteria(or stricter, if local rules indicate), regardless of whether a local ordinance has already been revised with the new criteria: 4 - Any reach with a floodway that is being delineated for the first time, including Risk Map studies; - Any reach that is already mapped using a 0.5' criteria; - Any reach that is being revised in a community that locally requests the new criteria;or - Any reach that is being revised through a FEMA Physical Map Revision If a new study results in a floodplain and floodway delineation that does not meet any of the above four circumstances, it may continue to use the floodway surcharge criteria that was in place for the previous floodway delineation. This rule must be applied regardless of whether the restudy was initiated at the local,state,or federal level,as long as it meets one of the above four conditions. Many studies initiated at the local level are of a smaller nature, and regulatory changes are often accomplished through a LOMR. As stated above, these studies would be exempt from the new requirement. Another important area of clarification relates to the transition of regulation from a 1'surcharge criteria to a 0.5' surcharge criteria. With very limited exceptions, nearly all floodways depicted on currently effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in Colorado portray the 1'surcharge criteria. Although some communities have expressed a desire for many years to have a lesser surcharge portrayed on their FIRMs(most commonly 0.5'), FEMA typically has mapped only the 1'surcharge floodway due to a longstanding policy that floodways based on an allowable surcharge more restrictive than the minimum standard would have to be adopted by state law or regulation (even when a 0.5'floodway is available and desired by the community). Because the definition of a floodway states that the surcharge cannot be more than a designated height, a surcharge that is consistently less than the designated height is appropriate and fits the definition. For this reason, CWCB believes that the new surcharge criteria does not require a change in local ordinance and therefore can be considered effective as of January 14, 2011. It is appropriate then that the new floodway criteria can be assumed effective for all new studies that started on or after January 14,2011. The start date is defined as issuance of Notice to Proceed for all non-federal studies and the date of formal issuance of the scope of work for all federal studies. An exemption is available for any studies that result in a change to a previously mapped floodway delineation due to a LOMR, as defined in the Rules. For normal circumstances,federal studies will take several years to complete and it is highly unlikely that the CWCB will need to designate and approve new floodway information (with the 0.5' surcharge) during the three year grace period unless a community has a specific need or request to do SO. The CWCB does not intend to designate newly mapped or remapped floodways with a 1'surcharge criteria for studies with a start date on or after January 14, 2011,with the exception of remapped floodways to be revised through a LOMR. FEMA has been coordinating with the CWCB regarding the new criteria and will support this rule statewide. The intent of this rule is to avoid "patchwork"floodways,with alternating criteria along short reaches, which is why studies resulting in Letters of Map Revision are specifically exempted. For the sake of consistency and fairness,the CWCB suggests that all new floodway information using the new 0.5' surcharge criteria should be completed as part of an objective government study that would lead to new FIRMs or Physical Map Revisions. 5 The CWCB has committed to maintaining a statewide database of stream reaches that use the 0.5' criteria. Once a reach is mapped with the 0.5'surcharge criteria, it must continue to use those criteria in future studies. FEMA and its mapping contractor have been involved in the discussions regarding transitioning to the new criteria. FEMA and the CWCB recommend that any uncertainty over prevailing criteria of a restudied reach should be addressed to the CWCB. If there is uncertainty regarding whether a study will result in a LOMR or a Physical Map Revision, FEMA and its mapping contractor will provide technical support. It is strongly recommended that inquiries regarding this issue take place before the study is started. It must be emphasized that this rule does not require automatic remapping of any stream reaches In other words, if existinp,delineated stream reaches have a 1.0'surcharge floodway attached to them they may continue to exist as the regulatory floodways until a decision is made in the future to restudy them. This rule only addresses the criteria to be used when the decision is made to update the stream reaches. If a community is satisfied with the accuracy of a stream reach that has already been mapped, then it may continue to regulate that reach with the currently mapped floodway. However,as soon as a stream reach is restudied, it should incorporate the new criteria to remap the floodway, unless it will revise the effective FIRM with a LOMR. It must also be emphasized that this rule does not require a floodway to be mapped for new studies. The level of detail for floodplain studies has always varied based on the funds available for the study and the desire for information by the local community. It is still allowable to complete a detailed study for a studied stream without delineating a floodway, as has always been the case. This rule does not add a requirement for floodways to be created either in detailed or approximate studies. The new criteria are generally considered to be a mapping issue, rather than a regulation issue. The new criteria associated with this rule only affect the identification of a floodway reach. It does not, in any way,change the floodplain regulations associated with the floodway or the process used by a local government to regulate floodways. As such, local governments are recommended to simply regulate identified floodways in the same manner that has always been done. Primarily, local governments should continue to require a no-rise certification by a qualified professional (as outlined in this rule No- rise certifications,while technically challenging in many cases, are entirely possible). The most common approach to arriving at a no-rise design of a project is the concept of compensatory storage/conveyance where excavated areas may counteract stockpiled or filled areas. In these situations,engineers can model conditions to assess "net"floodway impacts. It is important to note that the floodway to be regulated is the floodway portrayed on the effective FIRM for the community, unless the community locally decides to regulate a stricter floodway. This means that even with the more restrictive criteria set forth in this rule, a community may continue to regulate the already mapped 1' criteria shown on its effective FIRMS until any reaches are restudied and officially revised by FEMA. As stated earlier,there is no mandate to restudy these reaches, but if any of the reaches are eventually restudied,they should follow the guidelines set forth above. Communities are reminded that this rule (and NFIP regulations)only require no-rise certifications for development within floodway areas. While development in the flood fringe adjacent to floodway areas may affect base flood elevations for the entire floodplain (including the floodway), increases in water surface elevation due to activities outside of the floodway are permitted. 6 A number of communities have inquired as to whether previously studied floodway information will be mandated for regulation,as this was not addressed in the Rules. For example,the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District(UDFCD) has completed a number of studies that incorporated both 1'surcharge criteria (to meet FEMA's requirements) and 0.5'criteria (which meets both UDFCD's model ordinance as well as some local ordinances of member governments). The 0.5'criteria has been used by some local governments,despite the fact that their official FIRMS portray 1' criteria. However, other governments that have not been regulating to the 0.5'criteria do not use the 0.5'floodways, even though they have been studied and delineated. The decision was made that it will be left to each local government to address this issue at the local level;the CWCB does not mandate previously-studied information that was not incorporated into the regulatory floodplain that was considered optional at the time of study. This rule also addresses floodway principles in detailed stream reaches in which floodways have not been delineated. This has always been addressed in NFIP regulations through 44 CFR Part 60.3(c)(10), which states: "(a community shall) require until a regulatory floodway is designated that no new construction,substantial improvements,or other development(including fill)shall be permitted within (regulatory floodplains) unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development,when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within the community." This federal regulation from the NAP has generally been described as suggesting that in areas with base flood elevations identified but no delineated floodway-the entire floodplain should be treated as a floodway until an encroachment analysis can identify which areas would have been considered as floodway,which should then be regulated accordingly. Communities are typically given more latitude in this process than with formal floodways. For example, no-rise certifications are not formally required, but are suggested in certain circumstances. How this is managed at a local level is up to the local community; however,this federal regulation,which has existed for decades, indicates that the concepts of the floodway cannot simply be ignored because a floodway is not delineated on the regulatory map. This rule formally modifies this regulation by substituting the 0.5' criteria,although it does not change the basic process of this preexisting regulation. The stricter criteria will not be enforced by the State until the local ordinance is updated to reflect this. It is important to note that this regulation resides in section (c)of 44 CFR Part 60.3 and addresses stream reaches with base flood elevations identified. FEMA does not require the above regulatory process in approximate studies where base flood elevations are not identified. The Rules similarly do not require that process in stream reaches with approximate studies. A number of communities have already adopted floodway criteria that is more stringent than the 0.5' criteria established by this rule. Communities are entitled to regulate to stricter criteria than that set forth in this rule. However, FEMA has indicated that it will likely continue to strive for consistency on what is shown on future FIRMS to reduce cross-boundary discontinuities. A number of industries have requested exemptions to this rule based on their unique circumstances. It should be noted that the floodway requirements have always been uniformly applied,and this will continue to remain so,with no exceptions for any specific activities or project proponents. On the other 7 hand,this floodway requirement should not be used as the basis for targeting any specific projects, land uses,or industries. Regarding Rule 9."Criteria for Determining the Effects of Flood Control Structures on Regulatory Floodplains" There has been some confusion regarding the purpose and intent of this rule. This rule does not address the legality, maintenance requirements,water rights impacts,and technical requirements for the existence of a flood control structure(such as a dam or detention pond). This rule only addresses whether the flood reduction purposes of the structure can be considered in the floodplain mapping process. In general,the requirements for the consideration of flood reduction capabilities are synonymous with FEMA's mapping criteria. For example, a reservoir may provide incidental flood storage potential for a number of runoff events. However, if there is not pool storage specifically dedicated to flood control,the effects of the reservoir are not counted toward reduction of the downstream regulatory floodplain. This is consistent with FEMA mapping standards. However,this rule just addresses the regulatory flood impacts of the reservoir and does not address any ancillary issues with the existence of the reservoir itself. Regarding Rule 10."Criteria for Determining the Effects of Levees on Regulatory Floodplains" There has been some confusion regarding the purpose and intent of this rule. This rule does not address the legality, maintenance requirements, and technical requirements for the existence of a levee. This rule only addresses whether the flood reduction purposes of the levee can be considered in the floodplain mapping process. In general,the requirements for the consideration of flood reduction capabilities are synonymous with FEMA's mapping criteria. For example, a levee may provide incidental flood protection, but has no provision for public maintenance or is uncertified as being structurally sound. In this case,the effects of the levee are not counted toward reduction of the regulatory floodplain. This rule just addresses the regulatory flood impacts of the levee and does not address any ancillary issues with the existence of the levee itself. As of the date of this document, FEMA policy guidance regarding levees is being developed and the ultimate directive is unknown. The intent of this rule was to be synonymous with FEMA guidelines at the time of the rulemaking hearing. While the CWCB still believes this to be the most prudent approach to dealing with levees,this rule is not intended to be in conflict with FEMA's policies regarding mapping standards involving levees. As such,this rule will remain consistent with FEMA's approach to mapping regulatory floodplains affected by levees. Regarding Rule 11,"Floodplain Management Regulations" This rule, among other things,establishes a new requirement for the treatment of development on lands that are removed by FEMA from the regulatory floodplain through a LOMR Based on Fill (LOMR-F). The intent of this rule is simply to require new and substantially improved structures built on these lands to maintain a lowest floor one foot above the base flood elevation,consistent with development in regulatory floodplains. The purpose of this rule is to mitigate known hazards associated with development in these areas. Experience has shown statewide that development that occurs in these areas has a higher risk of flooding than development in non-floodplain areas. 8 This rule does not apply to lands removed from the regulatory floodplain by FEMA through a LOMR, which although similarly named, is a completely different procedure. It also does not apply to lands removed from the regulatory floodplain through a Physical Map Revision or a Letter of Map Amendment. The local government is responsible for maintaining awareness of which lands within its community have been affected by a LOMR-F. The CWCB and FEMA can assist with this, if needed. Regarding Rule 12."Effects of Flood Mitigation Measures and Stream Alteration Activities on Regulatory Floodplains" This rule, among other things,clarifies a requirement established in 2005 that makes a State requirement for a LOMR to be applied for and issued for any development that increases or decreases the regulatory base flood elevation by more than 0.3 feet. The intent of this requirement is to create a compromise for mapping changes for activities deemed to create a significant change. Any change less than 0.3 feet to the base flood elevation is not considered to be significant by the State, and a mapping change will not be enforced. Although it is not a State concern,communities are reminded of their responsibilities to FEMA through the NFIP, as outlined in 44 CFR Part 65.3,which states: "A community's base flood elevations may increase or decrease resulting from physical changes affecting flooding conditions. As soon as practicable, but not later than six months after the date such information becomes available, a community shall notify(FEMA)of the changes..." This rule does not address responsibilities to FEMA,which is considered to be a local matter. Communities are encouraged to coordinate with FEMA regarding the possible need for floodplain map revisions for impacts from development that are less than 0.3 feet,especially in instances where there are multiple studies in the same general reach that may impact each other. Regarding Rule 15."Variances" The consideration and issuance of variances has always been viewed as a local issue. The CWCB is not involved in the variance process unless specifically requested by a local jurisdiction. Communities continue to be cautioned that the excessive issuance of variances,or variances issued for insufficient factors,can be grounds for enforcement action and may also place the community's status in the NFIP in jeopardy. Regarding Rule 16."Enforcement of Floodplain Rules and Regulations" The existence of more restrictive standards is outlined in NFIP regulations in 44 CFR Part 60.1,which states, "...any flood plain management regulations adopted by a State or a community which are more restrictive than the criteria set forth in (NFIP minimum regulations) are encouraged and shall take precedence." While the State has established its own enforcement procedure as outlined in this rule,communities are cautioned that their standing in the NFIP could be placed in jeopardy by violation of the Rules,which take precedence over minimum NFIP standards. However,the CWCB will not provide enforcement for locally adopted higher standards in excess of these state rules. Enforcement of such higher standards is considered to be a local issue and any complaints of violations will be referred to local jurisdictions. 9 Regarding Rule 20. "Effective Date" The effective date for the Rules is January 14, 2011. The Rules are retroactive in nature. Notwithstanding the previous discussion regarding Rule 8, a three year grace period has been provided for local governments to update their ordinances to comply with the Rules. The CWCB will undertake a comprehensive public outreach effort to assist communities with ordinance updates, including the development of a model ordinance. Communities and interested parties are encouraged to contact the CWCB for technical assistance at any time. Communities should consider anticipated timeframes of their local legal processes in order to have an updated ordinance by January 14, 2014. The Rules do not have a provision for time extensions on these processes. In an effort to accommodate development plans that existed prior to the effective date of the Rules, two exceptions have been established to allow(but not mandate) local communities to continue with development proposals that may be inconsistent with the Rules, but would have met previous floodplain standards. These exceptions include: - Issuance of a floodplain development permit by the local government prior to the date of ordinance update;or - Issuance of a Conditional LOMR (CLOMR) by FEMA prior to the date of ordinance update. Project proponents are reminded that a CLOMR is not the same as a floodplain development permit, and all permitting procedures established by the local government must be adhered to. It is at the discretion of the local government as to whether it will permit a non-conforming project having a valid CLOM R. 10 o FEMA Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 �^J9ND Stiff impact • changes to the- NFIP Note: This Fact Sheet deals specifically with Sections 205 and 207 of the Act. n 2012, the U.S. Congress passed the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 which calls on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and other agencies, to make a number of changes to the way the NFIP is run. As the law is implemented, some of these changes have already occurred, and others will be implemented in the coming months. Key provisions of the legislation will require the NFIP to raise rates to reflect true flood risk, make the program more financially stable, and change how Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) updates impact policyholders. The changes will mean premium rate increases for some—but not all -- policyholders over time. Background: In 1968, Congress created the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Since most homeowners' insurance policies did not cover flood, property owners who experienced a flood often found themselves financially devastated and unable to rebuild. The NFIP was formed to fill that gap. To ensure the program did not take on unnecessary risks, one of the key requirements to participate in the program was that communities had to adopt standards for new construction and development. Pre-existing homes and businesses, though, could remain as they were. Owners of many of these older properties could obtain insurance at lower, subsidized, rates that did not reflect the property's real risk. In addition, as the initial flood risk identified by the NFIP has been updated over the years, many homes and businesses in areas where the revised risk was determined to be higher have also received discounted rates. This "Grandfathering" approach prevented rate increases for existing properties when the flood risk in their area increased. Fast forward 45 years, flood risks continue and the costs and consequences of flooding are increasing dramatically. In 2012, Congress passed legislation to make the National Flood Insurance Program more sustainable and financially sound over the long term. What this means: The new law eliminates some artificially low rates and discounts which are no longer sustainable. Most flood insurance rates will reflect full risk, and flood insurance rates will rise on some policies. Actions such as buying or selling a property, or allowing a policy to lapse, can trigger rate changes. You should talk to your insurance agent about how changes may affect your property and flood insurance policy. There are investments you and your community can make to reduce the impact of rate changes. And FEMA can help communities lower flood risk and flood insurance premiums. What is Changing Now? Most rates for most properties will more accurately reflect risk. Subsidized rates for non- primary/secondary residences are being phased out now. Subsidized rates for other classes of properties will be eliminated over time, beginning in late 2013. There are several actions which can March 2013 1 Eiiiergency Maiiageiiient Agency trigger a rate change, and not everyone will be affected. It's important to know the distinctions and actions to avoid, or to take, to lessen the impacts. Not everyone will be affected immediately by the new law—only 20 percent of NFIP policies receive subsidies. Talk to your agent about how rate changes could affect your policy. • Owners of non-primary/secondary residences in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) will see 25 percent increase annually until rates reflect true risk—began January 1, 2013. • Owners of property which has experienced severe or repeated flooding will see 25 percent rate increase annually until rates reflect true risk—beginning October 1, 2013. • Owners of business properties in a Special Flood Hazard Area will see 25 percent rate increase annually until rates reflect true risk-- beginning October 1, 2013. Owners of primary residences in SFHAs will be able to keep their subsidized rates unless or until: • You sell your property; • You allow your policy to lapse; • You suffer severe, repeated, flood losses; or • You purchase a new policy. Grandfathering Changes Expected in 2014 The Act calls for a phase-out of discounts, including grandfathered rates, and a move to risk-based rates for most properties when the community adopts a new Flood Insurance Rate Map. So if you live in a community that adopts a new, updated Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), discounts—including grandfathered rates--will be phased out. This will happen gradually, with new rates increasing by 20% per year for five years. Implementation is anticipated in 2014. What Can Be Done to Lower Costs? For home owners and business owners: • Talk to your insurance agent about your insurance options. • You'll probably need an Elevation Certificate to determine your correct rate. • Higher deductibles might lower your premium. • Consider remodeling or rebuilding. • Building or rebuilding higher will lower your risk and could reduce your premium. • Consider adding vents to your foundation or using breakaway walls. • Talk with local officials about community-wide mitigation steps. For community officials: • Consider joining the Community Rating System (CRS) or increasing your CRS activities to lower premiums for residents. • Talk to your state about grants. FEMA issues grants to states which can distribute the funds to communities to help with mitigation and rebuilding. March 2013 2 TOWN OF FRASER ORDINANCE NO. 405 Series 2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE 4 OF THE MUNICIPALCODE OF THE TOWN OF FRASER BY THE ADOPTION OF REVISED REGULATIONS FOR THE PREVENTION OF FLOOD DAMAGE WITHIN THE TOWN OF FRASER; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE PROVISIONS THEREOF. WHEREAS, pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 31, Article 23, Parts 2 and 3, the Legislature of the State of Colorado has delegated the responsibility to local governmental units to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry; and WHEREAS, flood hazard areas of the Town of Fraser, are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, these flood losses are created by the cumulative effect of obstructions in floodplains which cause an increase in flood heights and velocities, and by the occupancy of flood hazards areas by uses vulnerable to floods and hazardous to other lands because they are inadequately elevated, floodproofed or otherwise protected from flood damage. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, THAT: PART 1: AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 18 of the Code of the Town of Fraser, Colorado (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") is hereby amended as follows: [Note: additions are shown in black bold underlined print; deletions are shown as print: FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION REGULATIONS Sec. 18-4-10. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE - 1 - (a) It is the purpose of this Article to promote the public health, safety and general welfare and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: (1) Protect human life and health; (2) Minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; (3) Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; (4) Minimize prolonged business interruptions; (5) Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in floodplains; (6) Help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of flood-prone areas in such a manner as to minimize future flood blight areas; and (7) Insure that potential buyers are notified that property is in a flood area. Sec. 18-4-20. METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES (a) In order to accomplish its purposes, this Article uses the following methods: (1) Restrict or prohibit uses that are dangerous to health, safety or property in times of flood, or cause excessive increases in flood heights or velocities; (2) Require that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; (3) Control the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which are involved in the accommodation of flood waters; (4) Control filling, grading, dredging and other development which may increase flood damage; (5) Prevent or regulate the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or which may increase flood hazards to other lands. Sec. 18-4-30. DEFINITIONS -2 - Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this Article shall be interpreted to give them the meaning they have in common usage and to give this Article its most reasonable application. APPEAL— means a request for a review of the Town's Manager's interpretation of any provisions of this Article or a request for a variance. ALLUVIAL FAN FLOODING - means flooding occurring on the surface of an alluvial fan or similar landform which originates at the apex and is characterized by high-velocity flows; active processes of erosion, sediment transport, and deposition; and unpredictable flow paths. AREA OF SHALLOW FLOODING - means a designated AO, AH, or VO zone on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)with a one percent chance or greater annual chance of flooding to an average depth of one to three feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. AREA OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD - is the land in the floodplain within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. The area may be designated as Zone A on the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM). After detailed ratemaking has been completed in preparation for publication of the FIRM, Zone A usually is refined into Zones A, AE, AH, AO, Al-99, VO, V1-30, VE or V. BASE FLOOD - means the flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (BFE) - The elevation shown on a FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map for Zones AE, AH, Al-A30, AR, ARIA, AR/AE, AR/A1-A30, AR/AH, AR/AO, V1-V30, and VE that indicates the water surface elevation resulting from a flood that has a one percent chance of equaling or exceeding that level in any given year. BASEMENT - means any area of the building having its floor sub-grade (below ground level) on all sides. CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (CLOMR) - FEMA's comment on a proposed protect, which does not revise an effective floodplain map, that would, upon construction, affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source and thus result in the modification of the existing regulatory floodplain. -3 - CRITICAL FACILITY—A structure or related infrastructure but not the land on which it is situated, as specified in Section 18-4-140, that if flooded may result in significant hazards to public health and safety or interrupt essential services and operations for the community at any time before, during and after a flood. DEVELOPMENT - means any man-made change in improved and unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials. ELEVATED BUILDING — means for insurance purposes, a nonbasement building which has its lowest floor raised above ground level by foundation walls, shear walls, posts, piers, pilings or columns. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION - means for the purposes of determining rates, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced before the effective date of the FIRM or before January 1, 1975, for FIRMs effective before that date. "Existing construction" may also be referred to as "existing structures." EXISTING MANUFACTURED HOME PARK OR SUBDIVISION - means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before the effective date of the floodplain management regulations adopted by a community. EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING MANUFACTURED HOME PARK OR SUBDIVISION- means the preparation of additional sites by the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads). FLOOD OR FLOODING - means a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from: 1. the overflow of inland or tidal waters. 2. the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) - means an official map of a community, on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. -4 - FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY - is the official report provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The report contains flood profiles, water surface elevation of the base flood, as well as the Flood Boundary-Floodway Map. FLOODPLAIN OR FLOOD-PRONE AREA- means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see definition of flooding). FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT- means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood control works and floodplain management regulations. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS - means zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as a floodplain ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance) and other applications of police power. The term describes such state or local regulations, in any combination thereof, which provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and reduction. FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM - means those physical structural works for which funds have been authorized, appropriated, and expended and which have been constructed specifically to modify flooding in order to reduce the extent of the areas within a community subject to a "special flood hazard" and the extent of the depths of associated flooding. Such a system typically includes hurricane tidal barriers, dams, reservoirs, levees or dikes. These specialized flood modifying works are those constructed in conformance with sound engineering standards. FLOOD PROOFING - means any combination of structural and non-structural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures and their contents. FLOODWAY (REGULATORY FLOODWAY) - means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. The Colorado statewide standard for the designated height to be used for all newly studied reaches shall be one-half foot (six inches). Letters of Map Revision to existing floodwav delineations may continue to use the floodwav criteria in place at the time of the existing floodwav delineation. FREEBOARD - The vertical distance in feet above a predicted water surface elevation intended to provide a margin of safety to compensate for unknown factors that could contribute to flood heights greater than the height calculated for a selected size flood such as debris blockage of bridge openings and the increased runoff due to urbanization of the watershed. -5 - HIGHEST ADJACENT GRADE - means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. HISTORIC STRUCTURE - means any structure that is: 1. Listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register; 2. Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district; 3. Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of Interior; or 4. Individually listed on a local inventory or historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either: a) by an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior or; b) directly by the Secretary of the Interior in states without approved programs. LEVEE - means a man-made structure, usually an earthen embankment, designed and constructed in accordance with sound engineering practices to contain, control, or divert the flow of water so as to provide protection from temporary flooding. LEVEE SYSTEM - means a flood protection system which consists of a levee, or levees, and associated structures, such as closure and drainage devices, which are constructed and operated in accordance with sound engineering practices. LOWEST FLOOR- means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking or vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a building's lowest floor; provided that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirement of Section 60.3 of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations. MANUFACTURED HOME - means a structure transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation -6 - when connected to the required utilities. The term "manufactured home" does not include a "recreational vehicle". MANUFACTURED HOME PARK OR SUBDIVISION - means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale. MEAN SEA LEVEL - means, for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum, to which base flood elevations shown on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. NEW CONSTRUCTION - means, for the purpose of determining insurance rates, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of an initial FIRM or after December 31, 1974, whichever is later, and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. For floodplain management purposes, "new construction" means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. NEW MANUFACTURED HOME PARK OR SUBDIVISION - means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed on or after the effective date of floodplain management regulations adopted by a community. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE - means a vehicle which is: 1. built on a single chassis; 2. 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projections; 3. designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck; and 4. designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use START OF CONSTRUCTION - (for other than new construction or substantial improvements under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act(Pub. L. 97-348)), includes substantial improvement and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement, or other improvement was within 180 days of the permit date. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent -7 - construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for basement, footings, piers or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. STRUCTURE - means a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE - means damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT - means any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before "start of construction" of the improvement. This includes structures which have incurred "substantial damage", regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: 1. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary conditions or 2. Any alteration of a "historic structure", provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure." VARIANCE - is a grant of relief to a person from the requirement of this ordinance when specific enforcement would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance, therefore, permits construction or development in a manner otherwise prohibited by this ordinance. (For full requirements see Section 60.6 of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations.) VIOLATION - means the failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with the community's floodplain management regulations. A structure or other development without the elevation certificate, other certifications, or other evidence of compliance required in Section 60.3(b)(5), (c)(4), (c)(10), (d)(3), (e)(2), (e)(4), or(e)(5) is presumed to be in violation until such time as that documentation is provided. - 8 - WATER SURFACE ELEVATION - means the height, in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 (or other datum, where specified), of floods of various magnitudes and frequencies in the floodplains of coastal or riverine areas. Sec. 18-4-40. GENERAL PROVISIONS (a) Lands To Which This Ordinance Applies. This Article shall apply to all areas of special flood hazard and areas removed from the floodplain by the issuance of a FEMA Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill (LOMR-F) within the jurisdiction of Fraser. (b) Basis For Establishing The Areas Of Special Flood Hazard The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in a scientific and engineering report entitled, "The Flood Insurance Study for eraser Grand County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas," dated January 2, 2008, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Boundary-Floodway Maps (FIRM and FBFM) and any revisions thereto are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. (c) Establishment Of Development Permit. A Development Permit shall be required to ensure conformance with the provisions of this Article. (d) Compliance. No structure or land shall hereafter be located, altered, or have its use changed without full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. (e) Abrogation And Greater Restrictions. This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance and another ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail. (f) Interpretation. In the interpretation and application of this Article, all provisions shall be: (1) considered as minimum requirements; (2) liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and (3) deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under State statutes. (g) Warning And Disclaimer Or Liability. The degree of flood protection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. On rare occasions greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that -9 - land outside the areas of special flood hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of the community or any official or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. Sec. 18-4-50. ADMINISTRATION (a) Designation of the Floodplain Administrator. The Town Manager, or its designee, is hereby appointed the Floodplain Administrator to administer and implement the provisions of this ordinance and other appropriate sections of 44 CFR (National Flood Insurance Program Regulations) pertaining to floodplain management. (b) Duties & Responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator. Duties and responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Maintain and hold open for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of this ordinance. (2) Review permit application to determine whether proposed building site, including the placement of manufactured homes, will be reasonably safe from flooding. (3) Review, approve or deny all applications for development permits required by adoption of this ordinance. (4) Review permits for proposed development to assure that all necessary permits have been obtained from those Federal, State or local governmental agencies (including Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1334)from which prior approval is required. (5) Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions) the Floodplain Administrator shall make the necessary interpretation. (6) Notify, in riverine situations, adjacent communities and the State Coordinating Agency which is Colorado Water Conservation Board, prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. (7) Assure that the flood carrying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse is maintained. - 10 - (8) When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Section 18-4-40(b), the Floodplain Administrator shall obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation data and floodway data available from a Federal, State or other source, in order to administer the provisions of Sections 18-4-70 to 18-4-110. (9) When a regulatory floodway has not been designated, the Floodplain Administrator must require that no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within Zones Al-30 and AE on the community's FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one-half foot at any point within the community. (10) Under the provisions of 44 CFR Chapter 1, Section 65.12, of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations, a community may approve certain development in Zones Al-30, AE, AH, on the community's FIRM which increases the water surface elevation of the base flood by more than one-half foot, provided that the community first applies for a conditional FIRM revision through FEMA (Conditional Letter of Map Revision). (c) Permit Procedures. (1) Application for a Development Permit shall be presented to the Floodplain Administrator on forms furnished by him/her and may include, but not be limited to, plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the location, dimensions, and elevation of proposed landscape alterations, existing and proposed structures, including the placement of manufactured homes, and the location of the foregoing in relation to areas of special flood hazard. Additionally, the following information is required: (i) Elevation (in relation to mean sea level), of the lowest floor(including basement) of all new and substantially improved structures; (ii) Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any nonresidential structure shall be floodproofed; (iii) A certificate from a registered professional engineer or architect that the nonresidential floodproofed structure shall meet the floodproofing criteria of Section 18- 4-80(b); (iv) Description of the extent to which any watercourse or natural drainage will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. - 11 - (v) Maintain a record of all such information in accordance with Section 18-4-50 (b) (1). (2) Approval or denial of a Development Permit by the Floodplain Administrator shall be based on all of the provisions of this ordinance and the following relevant factors: (i) The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; (ii) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; (iii) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; (iv) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; (v) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (vi) The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions including maintenance and repair of streets and bridges, and public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems; (vii) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site; (viii) The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; (ix) The availability of alternative locations, not subject to flooding or erosion damage, for the proposed use; (x) The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan for that area. Sec. 18-4-60. VARIANCE PROCEDURES (a) The Board of Adjustment as established by the Town of Fraser shall hear and render judgement on requests for variances from the requirements of this Article. (b) The Board of Adjustment shall hear and render judgement on an appeal only when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of this Article. - 12 - (c) Any person or persons aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Adjustment may appeal such decision in the courts of competent jurisdiction. (d) The Floodplain Administrator shall maintain a record of all actions involving an appeal and shall report variances to the Federal Emergency Management Agency upon request. (e) Variances may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in the remainder of this Article. (f) Variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing the relevant factors in Section 18-4-50 (c) (2) of this Article have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond the one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases. (g) Upon consideration of the factors noted above and the intent of this Article, the Board of Adjustment may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purpose and objectives of this Article. (h) Variances shall not be issued within any designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. (i) Variances may be issued for the repair or rehabilitation of historic structures upon a determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure. (j) Prerequisites for granting variances: (1) Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. (2) Variances shall only be issued upon: (i) showing a good and sufficient cause; (ii) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant, and - 13 - (iii) a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. (3) Any application to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice that the structure will be permitted to be built with the lowest floor elevation below the base flood elevation, and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation. (k) Variances may be issued by a community for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that: (1) the criteria outlined in Section 18-4-60 (a)-(i) are met, and (2) the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety. Sec. 18-4-70. PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION/GENERAL STANDARDS (a) In all areas of special flood hazards the following provisions are required for all new construction and substantial improvements: (1) All new construction or substantial improvements shall be designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy; (2) All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; (3) All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage; (4) All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. (5) All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system; - 14 - (6) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from the systems into flood waters; and, (7) On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. (b) When a regulatory floodway has not been designated, the Floodplain Administrator must require that no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within Zones Al-30 and AE on the community's FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one-half foot at any point within the community; and, (c) Under the provisions of 44 CFR Chapter 1, Section 65.12, of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations, a community may approve certain development in Zones A1- 30, AE, AH, on the community's FIRM which increases the water surface elevation of the base flood by more than one-half foot, provided that the community first applies for a conditional FIRM revision through FEMA (Conditional Letter of Map Revision). Sec. 18-4-80. PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION/SPECIFIC STANDARDS In all areas of special flood hazards where base flood elevation data has been provided as set forth in (i) Section 18-4-40 (b), (ii) Section 18-4-50 (b) (8), or(iii) Section 18-4-90 (c), the following provisions are required: (a) Residential Construction - new construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor(including basement), elevated to one foot or- above the base flood elevation. A registered professional engineer, architect, or land surveyor shall submit a certification to the Floodplain Administrator that the standard of this subsection as proposed in Section 18-4-50(c)(1), is satisfied. (b) Nonresidential Construction - new construction and substantial improvements of any commercial, industrial or other nonresidential structure shall either have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated to er-one foot above the base flood level or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, be designed so that below one foot above the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. A registered professional engineer or architect shall develop and/or review structural design, specifications, and plans for the construction, and shall certify - 15 - that the design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice as outlined in this subsection. A record of such certification which includes the specific elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which such structures are floodproofed shall be maintained by the Floodplain Administrator. (c) Enclosures - new construction and substantial improvements, with fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement and which are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: (1) A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. (2) The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. (3) Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters. (d) Manufactured Homes— (1) Require that all manufactured homes to be placed within Zone A on a community's FHBM or FIRM shall be installed using methods and practices which minimize flood damage. For the purposes of this requirement, manufactured homes must be elevated and anchored to resist flotation, collapse, or lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable State and local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. (2) Require that manufactured homes that are placed or substantially improved within Zones Al-30, AH, and AE on the community's FIRM on sites (i) outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision, (ii) in a new manufactured home park or subdivision, (iii) in an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, or(iv) in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as a result of a flood, be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated to er one foot above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. - 16 - (3) Require that manufactured homes be placed or substantially improved on sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision with Zones Al-30, AH and AE on the community's FIRM that are not subject to the provisions of paragraph (4) of this section be elevated so that either: (i) the lowest floor of the manufactured home is at or one foot above the base flood elevation, or (ii) the manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at least equivalent strength that are no less than 36 inches in height above grade and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement. (e) Recreational Vehicles - Require that recreational vehicles placed on sites within Zones Al-30, AH, and AE on the community's FIRM either: (1) be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, (2) be fully licensed and ready for highway use, or (3) meet the permit requirements of Section 18-4-50(c)(1), and the elevation and anchoring requirements for "manufactured homes" in paragraph (4) of this section. A recreational vehicle is ready for highway use if it is on its wheels or jacking system, is attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and has no permanently attached additions. (f) Below-Grade Residential Crawlspace Construction - New construction and substantial improvement of any below-grade crawlspace shall: (1) Have the interior grade elevation that is below base flood elevation no lower than two feet below the lowest adjacent grade; (2) Have the height of the below-grade crawlspace measured from the interior grade of the crawlspace to the top of the foundation wall, not exceed four feet at any point; (3) Have an adequate drainage system that allows floodwaters to drain from the interior area of the crawlspace following a flood; (4) Be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure and be capable of resisting the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads; (5) Be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; - 17 - (6) Be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage; (7) Be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding; (8) Be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: (i) A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided; (ii) The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade; (iii) Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters. Sec. 18-4-90. PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION/STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISION PROPOSALS (a) All subdivision proposals including the placement of manufactured home parks and subdivisions shall be consistent with Sections 18-4-10 and 18-4-20 of this Article. (b) All proposals for the development of subdivisions including the placement of manufactured home parks and subdivisions shall meet Development Permit requirements of Section 18-4-40 (c); Section 18-4-50 (c) and the provisions of Sections 18-4-70 to 18-4-110 of this Article. (c) Base flood elevation data shall be generated for subdivision proposals and other proposed development including the placement of manufactured home parks and subdivisions which is greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is lesser, if not otherwise provided pursuant to Section 18-4-40 (b) or Section 18-4-50 (b) (8)this Article. (d) All subdivision proposals including the placement of manufactured home parks and subdivisions shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards. (e) All subdivision proposals including the placement of manufactured home parks and subdivisions shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage. - 18 - Sec. 18-4-100. PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION/STANDARDS FOR AREAS OF SHALLOW FLOODING (AO/AH ZONES) Located within the areas of special flood hazard established in Section 18-4-40 (b), are areas designated as shallow flooding. These areas have special flood hazards associated with base flood depths of 1 to 3 feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist and where the path of flooding is unpredictable and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow; therefore, the following provisions apply: (a) All new construction and substantial improvements of residential structures have the lowest floor(including basement) elevated one foot above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as one foot above the depth number specified in feet on the community's FIRM (at least three twe (2)feet if no depth number is specified). (b) All new construction and substantial improvements of non-residential structures: (1) have the lowest floor(including basement) elevated above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as one foot above the depth number specified in feet on the community's FIRM (at least three tore feet if no depth number is specified), or; (2) together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities be designed so that below one foot above the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads of effects of buoyancy. (c) A registered professional engineer or architect shall submit a certification to the Floodplain Administrator that the standards of this Section, as proposed in Section 18-4-50 (c) (1) are satisfied. (d) Require within Zones AH or AO adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes, to guide flood waters around and away from proposed structures. Sec. 18-4-110. PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION /FLOODWAYS Floodways - located within areas of special flood hazard established in Section 18-4-40 (b) are areas designated as foodways. Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry debris, potential projectiles and erosion potential, the following provisions shall apply: (a) Encroachments are prohibited, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development within the adopted regulatory floodway unless it has been - 19 - demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment would not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. (b) If Section 18-4-110 (1) above is satisfied, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Sections 18- 4-70 to 18-4-110. (c) Under the provisions of 44 CFR Chapter 1, Section 65.12, of the National Flood Insurance Regulations, a community may permit encroachments within the adopted regulatory floodway that would result in an increase in base flood elevations, provided that the community first applies for a conditional FIRM and floodway revision through FEMA. Sec. 18-4-120. ALTERATION OF A WATERCOURSE For all proposed developments that alter a watercourse within a Special Flood Hazard Area, the following standards apply: 1. Channelization and flow diversion projects shall appropriately consider issues of sediment transport, erosion, deposition, and channel migration and properly mitigate potential problems through the project as well as upstream and downstream of any improvement activity. A detailed analysis of sediment transport and overall channel stability should be considered, when appropriate, to assist in determining the most appropriate design. 2. Channelization and flow diversion projects shall evaluate the residual 100-year floodplain. 3. Any channelization or other stream alteration activity proposed by a project proponent must be evaluated for its impact on the regulatory floodplain and be in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local floodplain rules, regulations and ordinances. 4. Any stream alteration activity shall be designed and sealed by a registered Colorado Professional Engineer or Certified Professional Hydrologist. 5. All activities within the regulatory floodplain shall meet all applicable Federal, State and Town of Fraser floodplain requirements and regulations. -20 - 6. Within the Regulatory Floodwav, stream alteration activities shall not be constructed unless the proiect proponent demonstrates through a Floodwav analysis and report, sealed by a registered Colorado Professional Engineer, that there is not more than a 0.00-foot rise in the proposed conditions compared to existing conditions Floodwav resulting from the project otherwise known as a No- Rise Certification, unless the community first applies for a CLOMR and Floodwav revision in accordance with Section D of this Article. 7. Maintenance shall be required for any altered or relocated portions of watercourses so that the flood-carrying capacity is not diminished Sec. 18-4-130. PROPERTIES REMOVED FROM THE FLOODPLAIN BY FILL A Floodplain Development Permit shall not be issued for the construction of a new structure or addition to an existing structure on a property removed from the floodplain by the issuance of a FEMA Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill (LOMR-F), unless such new structure or addition complies with the following: 1. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The lowest floor(including basement), electrical, heating, ventilation plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities (including ductwork), must be elevated to one foot above the Base Flood Elevation that existed prior to the placement of fill. 2. NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The lowest floor(including basement), electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities (including ductwork), must be elevated to one foot above the Base Flood Elevation that existed prior to the placement of fill, or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities be designed so that the structure or addition is watertight to at least one foot above the base flood level that existed prior to the placement of fill with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads of effects of buoyance. Sec. 18-4-140. STANDARDS FOR CRITICAL FACILITIES A Critical Facility is a structure or related infrastructure, but not the land on which it is situated, as specified in Rule 6 of the Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in Colorado, that if flooded may result in significant hazards to public health and safety -21 - or interrupt essential services and operations for the community at any time before, during and after a flood. 1. CLASSIFICATION OF CRITICAL FACITILIES It is the responsibility of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser to identify and confirm that specific structures in their community meet the following criteria: Critical Facilities are classified under the following categories: (a) Essential Services; (b) Hazardous Materials; (c) At-risk Populations; and (d) Vital to Restoring Normal Services. a. Essential services facilities include public safety, emergency response, emergency medical, designated emergency shelters, communications, public utility plant facilities, and transportation lifelines. These facilities consist of: L Public safety(police stations, fire and rescue stations, emergency vehicle and equipment storage, and, emergency operation centers); ii. Emergency medical (hospitals, ambulance service centers, urgent care centers having emergency treatment functions, and non- ambulatory surgical structures but excluding clinics, doctors offices, and non-urgent care medical structures that do not provide these functions); iii. Designated emergency shelters; iv. Communications (main hubs for telephone, broadcasting equipment for cable systems, satellite dish systems, cellular systems, television, radio, and other emergency warning systems, but excluding towers, poles, lines, cables, and conduits); v. Public utility plant facilities for generation and distribution ( hubs, treatment plants, substations and pumping stations for water, power and gas, but not including towers, poles, power lines, buried pipelines, transmission lines, distribution lines, and service lines); and A. Air Transportation lifelines (airports (municipal and larger), helicopter pads and structures serving emergency functions, and -22 - associated infrastructure (aviation control towers air traffic control centers, and emergency equipment aircraft hangars). Specific exemptions to this category include wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), non-potable water treatment and distribution systems and hydroelectric power generating plants and related appurtenances Public utility plant facilities may be exempted if it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser that the facility is an element of a redundant system for which service will not be interrupted during a flood. At a minimum, it shall be demonstrated that redundant facilities are available (either owned by the same utility or available through an intergovernmental agreement or other contract) and connected, the alternative facilities are either located outside of the 100- year floodplain or are compliant with the provisions of this Article and an operations plan is in effect that states how redundant systems will provide service to the affected area in the event of a flood. Evidence of ongoing redundancy shall be provided to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser on an as-needed basis upon request. b. Hazardous materials facilities include facilities that produce or store highly volatile, flammable, explosive, toxic and/or water-reactive materials. These facilities may include: L Chemical and pharmaceutical plants (chemical plant, pharmaceutical manufacturing); ii. Laboratories containing highly volatile, flammable, explosive, toxic and/or water-reactive materials; iii. Refineries; iv. Hazardous waste storage and disposal sites; and v. Above around gasoline or propane storage or sales centers. Facilities shall be determined to be Critical Facilities if they produce or store materials in excess of threshold limits. If the owner of a facility is required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to keep a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) on file for any chemicals stored or used in the work place, AND the chemical(s) is stored in quantities equal to or greater than the Threshold Planning Quantity (TPQ) for that chemical, -23 - then that facility shall be considered to be a Critical Facility. The TPQ for these chemicals is: either 500 pounds or the TPQ listed (whichever is lower) for the 356 chemicals listed under 40 C.F.R. § 302 (2010), also known as Extremely Hazardous Substances (EHS); or 10,000 pounds for any other chemical. This threshold is consistent with the requirements for reportable chemicals established by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. OSHA requirements for MSDS can be found in 29 C.F.R. § 1910 (2010). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation "Designation, Reportable Quantities, and Notification," 40 C.F.R. § 302 (2010) and OSHA regulation "Occupational Safety and Health Standards," 29 C.F.R. § 1910 (2010) are incorporated herein by reference and include the regulations in existence at the time of the promulgation this ordinance, but exclude later amendments to or editions of the regulations Specific exemptions to this category include: L Finished consumer products within retail centers and households containing hazardous materials intended for household use, and agricultural products intended for agricultural use. ii. Build_ings and other structures containing hazardous materials for which it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the local authority having jurisdiction by hazard assessment and certification by a qualified professional (as determined by the local jurisdiction having land use authority) that a release of the subject hazardous material does not pose a major threat to the public. iii. Pharmaceutical sales, use, storage, and distribution centers that do not manufacture pharmaceutical products. These exemptions shall not apply to buildings or other structures that also function as Critical Facilities under another category outlined in this Article. c. At-risk population facilities include medical care, congregate care, and schools. These facilities consist of: L Elder care ( nursing homes); ii. Congregate care serving 12 or more individuals ( day care and assisted living); -24 - iii. Public and private schools (pre-schools K-12 schools), before- school and after-school care serving 12 or more children); d. Facilities vital to restoring normal services including government operations. These facilities consist of: i. Essential government operations (public records courts, iails, building permitting and inspection services, community administration and management, maintenance and equipment centers ii. Essential structures for public colleges and universities (dormitories, offices, and classrooms only). These facilities may be exempted if it is demonstrated to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser that the facility is an element of a redundant system for which service will not be interrupted during a flood. At a minimum, it shall be demonstrated that redundant facilities are available (either owned by the same entity or available through an intergovernmental agreement or other contract), the alternative facilities are either located outside of the 100-year floodplain or are compliant with this ordinance and an operations plan is in effect that states how redundant facilities will provide service to the affected area in the event of a flood. Evidence of ongoing redundancy shall be provided to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser on an as-needed basis upon request. 2. PROTECTION FOR CRITICAL FACILITIES All new and substantially improved Critical Facilities and new additions to Critical Facilities located within the Special Flood Hazard Area shall be regulated to a higher standard than structures not determined to be Critical Facilities. For the purposes of this ordinance, protection shall include one of the following: a. Location outside the Special Flood Hazard Area; or b. Elevation or floodproofing of the structure to at least two feet above the Base Flood Elevation. 3. INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR NEW CRITICAL FACILITIES -25 - New Critical Facilities shall, when practicable as determined by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser have continuous non-inundated access (ingress and egress for evacuation and emergency services) during a100-Year flood event. Sec. 18-4-150. Penalties and enforcement (a) Every person convicted of a violation of any provision of this Article or the codes adopted herein shall be punished as set forth in Section 1-4-10 of this Code. (b) In the event of any violation or threatened violation of this Article, the Board of Trustees may, in addition to other remedies provided by law, institute an appropriate action for injunction, mandamus or abatement to prevent, enjoin, abate or remove such violation or threatened violation. PART 2: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance. PART 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PART 4: PUBLICATION: This Ordinance shall be published by title only. -26 - READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS 15th DAY OF May, 2013. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: _ BY: ( SEAL ) Peggy Smith, Mayor ATTEST: Lu Berger, Town Clerk Published in the Middle Park Times on -27 - ti C O ILO R A D O Planner Floodplain Memo for TB May 15th, 2013 On July 6, 2012, Congress reauthorized the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Along with that reauthorization came many changes that are slowly being implemented by the NFIP in accordance with the new legislation. Fraser participates in the NFIP and as such we must adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations that meet or exceed the minimum NFIP standards and requirements. Basically, these regulations provide the legal framework for communities to exercise their floodplain management responsibilities. Communities are also required to enforce more restrictive State requirements if they exist. The State of Colorado adopted higher standards for floodplain management, which are outlined in the Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in Colorado (Rules) effective January 14, 2011. These Rules are now the effective minimum floodplain standards for the State of Colorado and communities have three years from January 14, 2011 to adopt local regulations consistent with the Rules. Jamie Prochno, who is the Community Assistance Program Coordinator in the Watershed and Flood Protection Section with the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB), attended our recent TB meeting and explained the new regulations and the NFIP. As we discussed, Fraser needs to update our floodplain regulations by January 14, 2014 in order to continue to participate in the NFIP. For your information, floodplain regulations in general do not affect existing buildings unless they are substantially improved, which means that the value of the improvements exceeds 50% of the market value. For additional information, included in the packet is a technical guidance document detailing the Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in Colorado. Also, included in the packet is a memo on "Impact of Changes to the NFIP" and Ordinance No. 405, Prevention of Flood Damage. Staff is recommending approval of Ordinance No. 405. Please contact me with questions and/or comments. ctrotter(c-town.fraser.co.us. Thanks. Town of Fraser PO Box 370,Fraser,CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com O IS IX 'C � S. � M O U aj O m � 'C to cl -0 O =ct O C� "O :z 0 id O � O > p O c +cn id V] U E to n to 0 N U cl to U U to C,j y O O O. `3 +� � U 5 OU cj CA +' Qvv U O ^li cl cd cd N p n W bA O -� U cd '+ O O cl O O O. cd V] N Qp Qn a to cl Fj Qn cl Z O Qn cn U U U ICI C� O P�US US t O bA ¢ +� = Cl O 6.0 cd . AS O"Uj O N O. O U bA N .. CJ U U bA U U cd U U (41 U U O Cj p E o = = cd U ° clj cl 0 ice--' Cj N �" C� U M " Cl �" C� V I N CC O to to U �'2- N U, (a =m Q to +' N U •U v -0 cd o LJ Z w 'C E� AClio U C,j -0 U Al o �,2. to �,2. �5.H c� o u o N co cl cl +� C cn o +' ° Q U) 0 L) 0 o a) to ct c LO co o •� � � � � � °�' � ago Lco +� U cd O U y 61) Q L) Q co N O "0' � 411) U) cn cn � � Q 7 Cd O fy N U bA= Q ° U 0 ' N x d ° o+C� C) +� o � o °6 � ce) ca o L) L)O on m c d bq 0 Cd W (A (A �. Z U O toN U U ci o o '.. U o � -0 �- +, �, c c 41 � p A U 7 N p O Ol '� E a cl U 'cl 0 U � z m ro " Q � � W op 3 •O o '� p z y C ed E c. -0 = o c o :z cj cn CJ cd O U 0 Q '� J w V Ln D m cn cl w 00 m O O �" � cot O O + O cn 4 cl cl U U n U O 'C N O to N 5 cl cn cn C)p U co U ` °c cl U 41 - O + "C -cl iO U c d = n� d U cl cl M cl cd ,� 4� = o ' >C � s•. cn O ,..� 0 .- U , cl � U o c + cn cl o o ° U U L7 w .� -C� cJ ct 0 to o cl +� o � � + c U cl U on O ° o +� u to cl 0 yU ) � O bA cl �" 4� 4 U vi m. U O N 3 d v'O = c = � cl n p U U —Cli cl p w cl En En cl cl cl cl �. � o C) � � ° +, r U °�' o to ,cl one 5 U U Cli o U U on �.cl CJ one p H C,j c on � H °' � +' � •� � � � � Iwo, •o�� � � � °��' o � � � C .N Y ° o o CJ o on cj cl o cl Cl 0 o cn 5 ��' cd ct ,� o �, ct > d to cn cd N d a Cj cl 0 C,j V 0 ^� 'C U � - C3 cl cn s p O � �. U 00 O �. +� cn �.. ~O N 0 . l O = 9 U Z cN l cd tb N � bq cl V O 0 0 cl cl cl 0 Ubn Q l U to cl s. O cn +, -0 bq U O O U -0 V "C - U "C � � � � �� U cl � � � � � bq Q n � to 'o � �. cd n V cl O +xj Q U -0 U) .- bq Cj 0 o U 0 cl cl ° A U ° - +C� �. E o 4� 7s o —Cli oI cl +� cj to to cli Cj -0 U Q ° on U Cl o -0�° +; . —Cj on cl � o ° ° �. C V p U s: U bq bA U bq U p -C c cl cl clj cl Z +; cl cl o ° C -C r p +, U O, +� y V1 cd � o � 'Z U) u O � - - Win +, � +� C) Q o o � ' o � G� : chi zs cl to C'j cl cl u C'j to O '0 v V a� cl a� o cn cl =C'J O +� .V O �. O cd cd n O O 71 2 O b�A � w � °' � � o � ` ¢ fix +' ° 2 d cl w �° w o o cl ° cl o o �° cl cn on Fj o ° cl 0 cl cl o 0 l o CI cl 0 C U U Cd p N _N cl ° n O b A C'j 142 cd p 2 1n °� °O o M CO y�-` M O N 72 N \ 4y 0 o N C by cd O 6 W U R In U cd -0 'C ;.. Q Q O U n cd C cl ,may N O cl c6 U S�.i N �..� i-- U CZ CC o Q ct � o bq 0 cl � p� � 00 O 'C a� n U � ° � Q eC eC +� w O N � _� �y a� > � � O � � � ;ANN s N U O V] C6 �I i� N U Vi Ui _ 6� N "�'i �O M �--� N 1n U � cd U U O O cd �� c� +� s. c� v cz +n Q O FQs � Q O a � a � ✓ � N � I� Q � MO U U � N cl x o o clj �,2. cn ° o o U `� o v ? O v cl o x on UU ° cd a O O m S� +�- U v �.. V1 x cl O U �" ¢ 'o U to 'C Cj to CA cl clj U O cli N "�C O cl :Z N � bq p O J x U C V1 U U m = .2 = + •-. US cl U U U ti U Z ti p *� s. 14; 0142 U L CJ �5 N + n �. cl U Z +U U } ? y U p cd V 0 n m U 4 cl U 0 CA id 'C + O U n V O bA V1 cl U cl O V n U U 2 O +, cl cd C) ° cl CJ cn 0 cl O 'C P- lull yU O UU) cl o Cj U U O "v� O 0Cut, a CJ cl 0 U cl —C U U C) U s. C�j cl cl cli cl cl 0 cli cl to to P. C) 0 CJ F3 C) Cj C) to to 0 m Cj -8 cl ---------- CA -0 cl to + M M to u cl C� o C) O- --------------- ---- 'o cl 4 cl �A -5 4-; --- LZ-Z( 142 ct -0 0 M ---------- ------- ------ -- --- a-z( clj cl E4 4( C) 'o 0 cl bq N cj C) 3c ---F----- ct +c� 0 m —C) cl -zi-----------7-----T--------- 14 cl - cj -0 ct Ic") 0 � *r. 2 cj cl cJ ------ oc-ol ci +2 5 u) u cl �: cj 0 +c� cl �a C) CA to :Z 0 6 u) = g cj cl 0 c L6 ci r m 0 E N -0 cl u 142 2 C) cl F" .14 m C) cl cl cl -0 ct v C) cl cl = 9 1 to u cj cl cl -0 cl cl c,j t" cli cl C) 0 C) + (4-1 -0 C'j 141 *r. clj D) (41 2 cj p cn zn cl cl O . + c� cj +c� cl 0 cl 0 cl C4 cl cl CA cli cd cl -.0 ct C) ct 7S 142 7s 2 7s cl 142 . U = cl o N N 0 • N N cl U p r� bA +, O cl N C) cl O cl to 0 •o 4•� o O cn ° on p } = o o o U O ,� •V clj cl Cj pp to CA CA bo cli IX N C) S o o 0 cl � 0 cl to C,� ° cl bo cl on + --o ° to w° ° +� cd cl o I IX cl, � � C, Q o � ° ti = •2 on cl °o cl cl o ° +' N 'C 7 N O 7 cl CA cl �, cl o 2 In x o + cl o o It�I a, p cl O N " fi y�„� bo _ s• + n 4 O �. O c� N N sue. bA � 40� 41 p � N Cj 4"0w ° cj Cj � w ono ° �� H > 4 S4° S �. w Cr Cr y = �'2. +, o o :z cl cl CA o o to CA cd b�A o o O U o ci U bo ' CA t cl 0 Cj cl cl U) cd U s. O [� n o cn Cc) o v1 cl o 9 �: _ v1 > Cc) c4 ° ' cl o o to 0 CA+� w °' U id U O V U y cd Cj CA j EA bo C'3 cl .� o��n un bo bo +' on +' " o o o o o cl o -� N W •+, N -C O s. +� cd o cd by N CA CA o � cl to 0 0 0 ° x °' ° o on �. on US CA cl ` n W bq¢ cn } Z CA E cl n v +� U bq•-� cl cl bhp +U J '� U 'C v cd U a O 'C v U cd U cd U U O O O O U O O o Cl C, Cl o Q x cn cn cl o > M cl 0 cl cj Cj cl CJ cl cl 0 O N �^ ° O O U O O O O 'C N cl Cut, U cl cl } bA U U � Cl cl 'C �'2. O +� cl bq �.Cj cl cl CA � �� � � o ' 10 2 10 cd 4 bA cl O O O +� O cl cl O O U U O N cd• cl cl C) CIJ m M M w cl on w O cd �. C� CJ �. � ozcl � � U) °' ~n cl cl 1. o a cl cj ... � � +; anon-� U � a� v, v� �' � � •° •� x C 6. Cj cj cl Ora cl cl 4 cl 0 C cl 'CJ .� ° ° to bA O U p 0 c4ml- Cj cl N to O Cl cl cl U U -Ccj cl ° c} on ..i Z a�i won o U o cc on cl o �. cl 141 cd ^ O U O C O U w � +, to cj C�j �. U to O O =o to _ zs O 0 to ct cl to U k Cj to U CA O U N cli U cd 'C s. N a O cd ci + O v cd O U `O :z -0 U U n p N cl 0 ct 0 cl 4d cn o cl cl cl CJ 0 U O N w p s — to rn s: s; � � � ¢, E J 7s rn s: s.. rn U 7s 7s rn by C1,31. cu j) U U p ° n +; O O c U cl C 'C 4a cl Cj O ° U 0 0 'C B O O U +, ° Z O U U U O y a C 0 U � CJ 3 ti O x °US cl Cl 21 cj CJ ctjo 0 CJ cn cn CJ cl 0 cl CJ cli N ¢ F" O W d Q o 'C on U, ct cl 0 cn to ct �" S•. N N N r 7' cl M •U O U � ss. O U «U C ° O to to � cj cl to cd to 'C �S. 6.. O ct W � n CC -C C +� �• O N U C clj Fj cl O v •O eC �, �V] N bn cl cl C U C W ¢ O O U v O bn CJ o Q Cl v +� v O v� O C U ` U �. °s' vU v C o Q �O U cl 0 Cj v cl O 0 p U N cl 0 'C + U N U �.'C `n cd U U El. cl 0.0 cl cl O O +' on o' O o -" �. C �. U O CJ cl Cj CJ C'j O C id C4-1 N Cj cl cl `° cl Cl P. U N cl U C +� s. �. p t� U *' cl C = C 'C . o ° on • =cj v U = .� o U U U cl to to to cl Cj 41 cl 0 pj N c� O N � U 0 c C U ..0 U ,S' U cIJ U U, ,--- ct to U > � cl U) 's. cl 'C � U p v 'O +4 v qo to to U V] U U vU 'C U P. U S U +� s id U U vU cd C,j cl O o oar cl C) O cl 0 cl P.� °w' � U ° � A ° °�.� U ° U v � o°n� ° `l cl +' n o c+. o to cl ma o M U O o +� U cn C) U N �/ N �"" o U UO to a' Cd '� ° A ,� V O ° c � O O �. cl ° W cr a �. o Z c +r. +, O -C cl +' n U -'C M -'C �cl cli M k O �� �. cd U by aj S `v ,S -0 U s cl S t. +S. S C) > Cj 00 U U sU. +� n O cd U cd U U U cj cl ,may U O� + cl U S�� a U V 142 (5 Cl 0 G� (41 C4:; U) � U Cj � = x Cj Cl cl u cl u cl o cl cl O ; O o � ° ° cod -0 Cc. � � b � rn bA U O O ~O W-4 • bA �" V o U bA U U p U cl cli CJ cl c Cam/] 'C Q 'C N cd +� c �) O o to to on cl V ° U V W= id � Cl 0 cl 0 a, o CJ U v 7. 0 cl CIJ O x CJ ° 3- N N 30- bA C� rrTT' � cli O O M S. �. Cl = P-I N Ga O Cd ti O a, bq "C vii CJ 0 Cj U -O 3 cd cl S. 'C O �'2. M 'C �. ° U cl on o "cl o ° v o s oNO 'C cf U O rp �. " = U O = �> o B cl cl 9O n O 1 cl n -- N O v� 0 bq �" U O +� s. N bA N U Cd �. cl 'n U 0 N U N ° b A C by p p nv U cl ul cl' � = 01 4. C ' b°n sU. 9 c -0 x 3 9 N v 'C a j id cl 0 U L cl + i 4 U x j +' U yU O O cl OC W ate, �. Cl o �„ o CJ o =o o clj cli cl cl cl ° Cr on � O � � °�' Z -0 1 �. � C, Cj N vU +' U bq ° U +' +x' Cj 0 cl cl to •� p Cj U o +� ct cn � o CJ °max c C o to 9 + Cj cn CA u 5 85 CA +' U C V� . r v G� 3 C— U) _ U cd l O s: U 'C 0 O O U i ¢ a U 0 c d O nay o � Cc) -.0 o � ° �. cl on cl cl u Cl C44 to to U U C U • + +� v U n C �" O a n to to to 1 by cd O rC U cd �. cd O to C O cd O cli + N CIJ �. O �j ° O O U n O rn U O U U � cd Cj vcn c� N N +� +' s. •f�. U cd U 0 U U cn n M~ � CS. to 0 n ¢ j P, - 'C 2 �.V C'j C'j O 9U c�d � c 'C U p sy N O n U U U O N Cj cl 7s U � x °on o ° ° N to O cl ct ° v +U O 'C cl cl Cl -0 O s. +� cH N by p O s �^ � t a � O cl to 2 ,C o, V '3 v -0 I—I •0 N U "� - Cj to 0 to cl U d Z C. H . H 1.x U2 E U Cn N M to M P. cd ct +� 2 � � � E o � o cl `� o cl � Z � o� Cl o 142 0 +' o '� U o o cn U n cd O �i cl O U n n + n U cd '. ;I '0 a O cj C) 1. 4. O w � O � � U � cl C O c U M US Q p Oc cl O ° cr ° bq ct x O a C O 0 r CIJ U +(5 � o �° O Q cz Q � E O - � cn Cl M cz s. �-; cd Z N y cl cl cl cl cl o Cj a, U) U)� +, +� on cn x o to cn cl U `d V -`l -0 c app= ° +� U v °s' cC� cl cl d N U d f, °� ° � ' er on_o o o � o � to -0 to U x cl° I O � -0'C to - � • ,S' N ,S�"r N O 0 v O O ° 0 NO cl (41 N o :Z ° o �: o r" cn cn cl �. �. -C by m o m o a, to cn O to � c U N bA sU. •.�. v �tA bUA p O O opc� -� ,4 m `° one ode U U U M U x 1c, u O x S U Cd � Cd Q N vi C4 cn cn o +; �; -- m � O o m o cl y p Q t5 C o E4 = o -C Z� > W o° o cl CJ Cj �. _ 'C +' �5 cl U U n cl +Fj cl �. 4:; C Cj to to ° O O O V O O CA � � � E ci O O.•.. cn cl r-L to p 'c j N +� s. yv +' v� >C 7 > L N U. to n U y O > L._ a� 'C N ^� bq •+' v N -0 O by U vv L c s C R L .� a`)o — cl cl O cl 'C N +ct +� H W ? N CA cn U -- s. +� cl x O O w cn O 'C s. rn M :z cd Q s cd cd O O N CJ O U cl � O O cl v U 0 O O 0 0 Cj 0 U v U U 0 CJ O\ Ly Z O Cj b�A p cj p O �Cli .� C x cn 4 -0 . p 0 4 -ti U U U O U cl O CA cn 0 cl cn o °�. cn cn cn o � � � o cl cl cl cl cn v1 W h CA (41 cn U � C,3 cl cl U •u -'C � � � -.0 � on c o o � o � Cl cl O O o O 0 ° cl 0 U ° P� °� v> °on °sue' S 141 Q O � o cl .0 o cl o � O M = � ( ' ° on o cl O cn cl Cj -0 to � N tea- o ¢ ct .o N � � ter" cl ; cl 0 cl +L w cl v' o G� c b CJ Cj Cl cl to cl o °2.Q cj o -0 a v1 srcjUQ Q0 Al to to on cn ¢ z cn cY 0 rn � � N rn N � c�.i � � �, 40 � a'•' 3••' O V1 Y to 0 o o cl one ; v1 Cl one ° °�' " _ v v v a� o cl ct M rn N O rn N v� bA 0 N CL 0 C)cd cd 0 0 0 141'15 H i—I a a a • Y3 U] i—I i—I S—I ° Cl Ic= p N bo N cl cn I to to S N Cj ci °°n. �. o B c to Cj o o d o o �" +� v O Otlo N N N C, cn E = O (41 +� O p O O ? U ^ b0 N N N Iz to'o O +, "� cl o ti. ,C,5 `j ° cj cl CA cl to cn CA Iz m �, o ., +, cn cl do ti ^ cl 0 0 0 `� W ,� p cl .� � -0 > `° x � -0 0 •c � ~ � � o tip° ao � � o to cl 0 -0 CJ °� •.. PENN PENN 0 to cl U) cl CJ to —Cli to CJ 0 0 C�j ,ice O rC� �, �. ob 'by ° +' � o o -0 -0 141 cl cl CA CIJ cl (41 Ui to cl �4 cl � � °' cl cl Oon } �" on^v ° Cl ±' +� �° `n � 4, o one. cn cl cn x1° o�n � o +, o ui cl O i �'. U cl C+-� sU. +' O bo �� +� cl . o U ° +' -'C � cl —Cli cl CA cd U C U C) cl 'C n O n + 'C U p-0 + +� cd x cn 'C >C O '+� U + +� U cd 3- O r. cl n U cl cl cl cl �" -- cd to cl n U +U a U �. C C�-" O O O to O 0 0 bo 'C N N C� Cd +x"- cl o 0 ' 0 cl to Cj U +' on °to 0 cl cl 0 cl 0 o 0 2 o N cl cl ai cn cl N •c j ,'� cl -0 N 'o ' 0 Cj cl a a ° bD N CA own l o cl u cl o c,3 C'j ° C'j cl C A cl o �; N O O 2 N °� ,-0 � � �.� -0 2 � to � � � obn " c i ono o � � 'o � cl To: Fraser/Winter Park Town Council(s) Attn:Katie Buss, Lou Berger From: Lindsey England, FVEArt/Science Date: March 29, 2013 Re: Regulation of Plastic Proposal I would like to propose a partnership with both the towns of Winter Park and Fraser in addressing the distribution of single-use plastic as an environmental concern, but also as a means of generating revenue within our communities to create more sustainable programs that promote environmental stewardship. It is my goal to involve both neighboring communities in the adoption of a city ordinance that levees a fee towards business patrons exercising a choice to consume single-use plastic bags. In adopting an ordinance that will create additional revenue in our communities, everyone stands to benefit: • local businesses would receive a percentage of this income to invest back into more sustainable resources • partnering communities would invest additional revenue into fostering a more cost-effective recycling program • non-profit organizations could access money to reinvest in our local environment through a grant program • local schools could enrich environmental programming and education through scholarships I am hoping to address both town councils with more information regarding how we can work together to make more economically and environmentally responsible decisions in our community. I would like to request being added to the agendas of: • Town of Fraser Board of Trustees Meeting, Wednesday, May Is' • Winter Park Town Council Meeting, Tuesday, May 7h Thank you for your consideration. Lindsey England FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Fraser, Colorado Financial Statements December 31, 2012 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Financial Report December 31, 2012 Table of Contents Page INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT Al —A2 Management's Discussion and Analysis B1 - B8 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets C1 Statement of Activities C2 Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: Balance Sheet C3 Reconciliation of Governmental Fund Balance to Governmental Activities Net Assets C4 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances C5 Reconciliation of Net Change in Fund Balances to Change in Net Assets of Governmental Activities C6 Proprietary Fund: Statement of Net Assets - Enterprise Funds C7 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets - Enterprise Funds C8 Statement of Cash Flows- Enterprise Funds C9 Fiduciary Fund: Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets C10 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets C11 Notes to the Financial Statements D1 —D24 Required Supplementary Information: Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget(GAAP Basis) and Actual - General Fund E1 Schedule of Revenues - Budget(GAAP Basis) and Actual - General Fund E2 i FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Financial Report December 31, 2012 Table of Contents (Continued) Page Required Supplementary Information (continued): Schedule of Expenditures and Transfers- Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual General Fund E3 Special Revenue Fund - Conservation Trust Fund E4 Supplementary Information: Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances— Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual Debt Service Fund F1 Capital Projects Fund - Capital Equipment Replacement Fund F2 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Net Assets - Budget (Non-GAAP Basis) and Actual With Reconciliation to GAAP Basis Enterprise Fund -Water Fund F3 Enterprise Fund -Wastewater Fund F4 Agency Fund - JFOC Fund F5 Annual Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures for Roads, Bridges and Streets F6—F7 ii MCMAHAN AND ASSOCIATES, JII AL PRELIMINARY DRAFT M Certified Public Accountants and Consultants �9 WEB SITE: WWW.MCMAHANCPA.COM CHAPEL SQUARE, BLDG C MAIN OFFICE: (970) 845-8800 A 245 CHAPEL PLACE, SUITE 300 FACSIMILE: (970) 845-8 1 08 P.O. BOX 5850, AVON, CO 8 1 620 E-MAIL: MCMAHAN @MCMAHANCPA.COM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and Town Council Town of Fraser, Colorado We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town of Fraser(the "Town"), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, which collectively comprise the Town's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents, and the related notes to the financial statements. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town of Fraser as of December 31, 2012, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Member:American Institute of Certified Public Accountants D. JERRY MCMAHAN, C.P.A. DANIEL R. CUDAHY, C.P.A. PAUL J. BACKES, C.P.A. MICHAEL N. JENKINS, C.A., C.P.A. AVON ASPEN FRISCO (970) 845-8800 (970) 544-399CD (970) 668-348 I Al FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT To the Honorable Mayor and Town Council Town of Fraser Other Matters Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management's Discussion and Analysis in Section B be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the Management's Discussion and Analysis in Section B in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. The budgetary comparison information in section E is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The budgetary comparison information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statement or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Town's financial statements as a whole. The individual fund budgetary comparisons found in Section F and the Local Highway Finance Report are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The individual fund budgetary comparisons found in Section F and the Local Highway Finance Report are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole. McMahan and Associates, L.L.C. April 16, 2013 A2 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS J COLORADO �_\ FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Management's Discussion and Analysis December 31, 2012 As management of the Town of Fraser, Colorado, ("Town"), we offer readers of the Town's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the Town for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Financial Highlights • On a short term view, the Town's governmental fund balances decreased by$338,864 in 2012, which is $695,148 better than the budgeted decrease of$1,034,012. The Town's General Fund's fund balance decreased $298,983, but was offset by an increase in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund of$116,179. • On a long-term view (including depreciation and excluding capital outlay, etc.)the Town had a 3% ($1,196,035) decrease in net position from $40,370,218 to $39,174,183. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the Town's basic financial statements. The Town's basic financial statements include three components: 1) government-wide financial statements; 2) fund financial statements; and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements. Government-wide financial statements: The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the Town's finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. The Statement of Net Position presents information on all Town assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the Town is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the government's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (i.e. uncollected revenues such as grants or earned but unused vacation leave.) Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the Town that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities). The governmental activities of the Town include general government, public safety, public works, and culture and recreation. The business-type activities of the Town include water distribution and system maintenance and wastewater function and system maintenance. The government-wide financial statements can be found on pages C1 and C2 of this report. Fund financial statements: A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The Town, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the Town can be divided into two categories: governmental and proprietary funds. B1 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Overview of the Financial Statements (continued) Governmental funds: Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near-term financing requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near-term financing decisions. The expenditures and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The fund financial statements for the governmental funds are shown on pages C3 and C5. The Town adopts an annually appropriated budget for all governmental funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for the General Fund, Conservation Trust Fund, Debt Service Fund and Capital Equipment Replacement Fund to demonstrate compliance with the State budget statutes. These are included in Sections E and F. Proprietary funds: The Town maintains two proprietary funds commonly known as enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. The Town uses an enterprise fund to account for its water operations and one to account for its wastewater operations, which was established on December 31, 2009 by the dissolution of the Fraser Sanitation District. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for each of the business-type services provided by the Town, which is considered to be a major fund of the Town. The basic proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages C7 through C9 of this report. The Town also presents a budgetary comparison for its proprietary funds on pages F3 and F4. Notes to the Financial Statements: The Notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The Notes to the Financial Statements can be found at Section D of this report. Government-wide Financial Analysis The largest portion of the Town's assets are reflected in the investment in capital assets (i.e. land, buildings, improvements, and equipment). Capital assets account for 79% of the total assets of $41,709,021. The Town uses these assets to provide services to its citizens. The Town has to pay liabilities out of the remaining liquid assets. The Town also has assets that are considered restricted for a variety of purposes. Accordingly, these assets are not an available source for payment of future spending, other than as restricted. B2 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Government-wide Financial Analysis (continued) The Town's restricted net position has changed as follows: Balance Balance 1/1/12 Additions Deletions 12/31/12 General Fund: Fees in lieu of Park $ 6,379 - - 6,379 Affordable housing impact fee 135,426 - - 135,426 Emergency reserves 70,000 10,000 - 80,000 Debt Service Fund reserves: Next year's payments 300,000 - - 300,000 Conservation Trust Fund 25,046 6,168 (15,337) 15,877 Wastewater Fund Operating reserve 52,364 631 (7,925) 45,070 Capital replacement reserve 839,295 59,331 (13,425) 885,201 $ 1,428,510 $ 76,130 $ (36,687) $ 1,467,953 The following shows the Town's net position for 2012: Town of Fraser's Net Position Governmental Business-type Activities Activities Total 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 Assets: Current and other assets $ 4,598,161 4,758,142 3,998,782 3,694,562 8,596,943 8,452,704 Capital assets 10,846,559 11,533,116 22,265,519 22,983,635 33,112,078 34,516,751 Total Assets 15,444,720 16,291,258 26,264,301 26,678,197 41,709,021 42,969,455 Liabilities: Other liabilities 306,183 81,216 12,040 31,625 318,223 112,841 Long-term liabilities outstanding 1,883,336 2,115,811 - - 1,883,336 2,115,811 Total Liabilities 2,189,519 2,197,027 12,040 31,625 2,201,559 2,228,652 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Unavailable revenue 333,279 370,585 - - 333,279 370,585 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 333,279 370,585 - - 333,279 370,585 Net Position: Invested in capital assets 8,963,223 9,417,305 22,265,519 22,983,635 31,228,742 32,400,940 Restricted 537,682 536,851 930,271 891,658 1,467,953 1,428,509 Unrestricted 3,421,017 3,769,490 3,056,471 2,771,279 6,477,488 6,540,769 Total Net Position $ 12,921,922 13,723,646 26,252,261 26,646,572 39,174,183 40,370,218 At the end of the current fiscal year, the Town is able to report positive balances in all three categories of net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business- type activities. B3 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Government-wide Financial Analysis (continued) The following chart is a summary of the Town's Change in Net Position: Town of Fraser's Change in Net Position Governmental Business-type Activities Activities Total 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 REVENUES: Program revenues: Charges for services $ 18,855 37,745 1,253,475 1,248,807 1,272,330 1,286,552 Operating grants and contributions 253,187 138,920 3,718 26,054 256,905 164,974 Capital grants and contributions 115,988 - 15,700 67,500 131,688 67,500 General revenues: Property taxes 297,549 348,653 - - 297,549 348,653 Sales and Use taxes 1,670,712 1,667,863 - - 1,670,712 1,667,863 Othertaxes 71,654 67,126 - - 71,654 67,126 Interest and other revenue 24,256 21,596 24,788 16,859 49,044 38,455 Total Revenues 2,452,201 2,281,903 1,297,681 1,359,220 3,749,882 3,641,123 EXPENSES: General government 978,866 833,529 - - 978,866 833,529 Culture and recreation 56,866 60,065 - - 56,866 60,065 Public safety 386,144 392,420 - - 386,144 392,420 Public works 1,744,925 1,472,546 - - 1,744,925 1,472,546 Interest 107,124 120,159 - - 107,124 120,159 Water - - 835,263 865,240 835,263 865,240 Wastewater - - 836,729 825,394 836,729 825,394 Total Expenses 3,273,925 2,878,719 1,671,992 1,690,634 4,945,917 4,569,353 Change in Net Position Before Transfers (821,724) (596,816) (374,311) (331,414) (1,196,035) (928,230) Transfers in (out) 20,000 20,000 (20,000) (20,000) - - Change in Net Position (801,724) (576,816) (394,311) (351,414) (1,196,035) (928,230) Net Position-Jan 1 13,723,646 14,300,462 26,646,572 26,997,986 40,370,218 41,298,448 Net Position -December 31 $ 12,921,922 13,723,646 26,252,261 26,646,572 39,174,183 40,370,218 Governmental activities: Governmental activities decreased the Town's net position by$801,724 during 2012, as compared to a decrease in net position of$576,816 during 2011. The following are the major elements of the change in net position from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012: • Public works expenses increased due to increase in number of public works employees. • General government expenses increased due in large part to an increase in reimbursable professional services. B4 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Government-wide Financial Analysis (continued) The following is a graph of the Town's governmental activities revenues by source for 2012. Interestand other Chargesfor Operating Grants revenue services &Contributions o Capital Grants and 1% 1% 10% Contributions Other Taxes (excluding assets) 3% 5% Property Taxes 12% Sales and Use Tax J 68% The following is a graph of the Town's governmental activities expenditures by function for 2012. General Interest government 3/ 30% Culture and recreation Public works 2/ 53% Public safety 12% Business-type activities: Business-type activities decreased the Town's net position by$394,311. Key elements of this decrease are as follows: • Depreciation expense on capitalized assets of$833,012 accounted for 50% of total operating expenses. B5 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Government-wide Financial Analysis (continued) The following is a graph of the business-type revenues by source for 2012. Capital Grants Operating Grants and Interestand &Contributions Contributions other revenue 0% I1% 2% Chargesfor services 97°% The following is a graph of the business-type expenses by function for 2012. Personnel 25% Depreciati 50% Commodities Syste m 10°% developmentand Contractual other 1% 14% Financial Analysis of the Town's Funds As mentioned on page B2 of this analysis, the Town uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. Governmental funds: The focus of the Town's governmental funds is to provide information on near- term inflows (revenues), outflows (expenditures), and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the Town's financing requirements. In particular, fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. B6 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Financial Analysis of the Town's Funds (continued) As of the end of the current fiscal year, the Town's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of$3,979,474; the funds decreased $338,864 from the prior year's ending balances. The Town's governmental fund balances for 2012 and the past two years are graphed as follows: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% --- -- --- 50 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011 2012 ■General Fund ■Conservation Trust Fund Debt Service Fund Capital Equipment Fund Proprietary funds: The Town's proprietary fund provides the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail. The proprietary funds'total cash is available for spending at the Town's discretion. Budget variances in the General Fund: The Town had the following significant budget variances which are detailed as follows: Variance Positive (Negative) Account Reason Revenues: $ 118,054 Other revenue Reimbursable professional services were higher than budgeted Expenditures: General Government: (55,547) Other purchased services Reimbursable professional services were higher than budgeted Public Works 75,392 Salaries and benefits Staff vacancies B7 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Financial Analysis of the Town's Funds (continued) Capital assets: The Town's government-wide capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, decreased due largely to depreciation expense. Additional information as well as a detailed classification of the Town's net capital assets can be found in the Notes to the Financial Statements on pages D14 and D15 of this report. Long-term debts: As of the end of the current fiscal year, the Town had $1,904,115 in long-term obligations. This includes obligations for sales and use tax revenue bonds, general obligation bonds capital leases and accrued compensated absences. Additional information regarding the Town's debt can be found on pages D16— D18 of this report. Sales and Use Taxes: The Town has sales and use taxes that are used to fund its governmental operations. The Town's sales and use taxes changed from a total of$1,667,863 in 2011 to $1,670,712 in 2012. The following chart indicates changes in the taxes collections: 1,700,000 1,650,000 1,600,000 1,550,000 1,500,000 2010 2011 2012 ` Sales and Use Taxes The Town's 2012 sales and use tax collections have been increasing over the past two years. Next year's budget and rates: The Town's General Fund balance at the end of the current fiscal year was $2,873,422. The Town's 2013 budget anticipates decreasing the General Fund balance by $167,294. Request for Information This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Town's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Town of Fraser, Finance Manager, P.O. Box 120, Fraser, Colorado 80442-0120. B8 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS J COLORADO �'_\ FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Statement of Net Position For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Governmental Business-type Activities Activities Total Assets: Cash and investments- Unrestricted 3,547,532 2,748,488 6,296,020 Cash and investments- Restricted 300,000 - 300,000 Cash with County Treasurer - 13,512 13,512 Accounts, taxes, and interest receivables 732,363 314,043 1,046,406 Due from fiduciary fund - 922,739 922,739 Prepaid expenses 18,266 - 18,266 Capital assets, net 10,846,559 22,265,519 33,112,078 Total Assets 15,444,720 26,264,301 41,709,021 Liabilities: Accounts payable 271,367 - 271,367 Due to fiduciary fund 9,972 - 9,972 Other liabilities 4,065 - 4,065 Accrued compensated absences 20,779 12,040 32,819 Non-current liabilities due within one year 243,342 - 243,342 Non-current liabilities due longer than one year 1,639,994 - 1,639,994 Total Liabilities 2,189,519 12,040 2,201,559 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Unavailable revenue - property taxes 333,279 - 333,279 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 333,279 - 333,279 Net Position: Net investment in capital assets 8,963,223 22,265,519 31,228,742 Restricted 537,682 930,271 1,467,953 Unrestricted 3,421,017 3,056,471 6,477,488 Total Net Position 12,921,922 26,252,261 39,174,183 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C1 H ry V (O V I� V L(7 O O O V O Lo N 00 00 0 O Lc) 00 m V (O V N O 0 c7 O O V I— N LO O M LO M 00 Q C) 00 — 00 00 00 N O C) L(! Lr I� L(7 L(! C) — G O N 2 Lo (O (O O) LO LO co O V [-- N O O O CO Lf) 00 (O O V +, CO L 00 O O 00 00 O 00 O � 1— V CO � 00 O I— 1— (O 0 � cc N ('� N N (O O ('7 H N (� N 0 0 ry V Cl) I..17 N Cc o L_ 7 ' C o Q O O O 00 O 00 N > a >� y I I I I I I 000 N O O I I I I I 1 I O 1- CO LO N O L(; ('7 O O V O V V (O N ra J Z U) N � ) ) N N ) > ( ( ( � N w N V A N N y • r � ° � a n W r m J a � _ _ Z R V 0 V I— V LO LO O LO N 00 O 0 O V 0 N ++ V 0 V N O O V I� N LO N M O I— N V N Z c y O 00 = 00 00 00 LO LO LO LO 0 O N O Lf) (O (O O) � Lf) Lf) I— N O O) �O) Lc) O V ('7 E }' CO LO 00 O O 00 00 O) � � V � N 00 O N N C > (O 0 00 00 N (O O 00 I— O) H y V N N coN � 0 N y 00 00 O O 00 U 'a C 00 00 O O 00 0 a O 0') I I I I 0 I 1- (0 (B N L3 cc •++ L(7 L(7 L(7 L(7 a+ 0 m Q N cc +L+ N o U A W U) U m L a d N y w p 0 y m co I— co co LO y 0 a C I— I 0 00 O U 0)N lC ++ N a) a O o I 1— m o L C > L3 ++ 00 L6 ('7 ('7 ('7 (O C U- N L3 y O V LO LO 4 O L 4 .0 N N N C O E W E N r— 'C m cc O L cc Q L N ++ y L0 U' O m 0 N 0 U i O L LO LO LO O LO O w L C 0 LO 00 LL 10— N 00 I I I I 00 (D 1- IT m r > (O (O N N L4 a) x�n U rn C L o — O L o x N V x O 7 C •C} N C O O N r 0 H (O (O V LO V LO Cl) O N I— N (6 L O N G N 000 000 = � � N 1- � O C N C p - a m W � LO 00 V O 1— Cl) Cl) I� ,T — 0 O N to N z C C y O Cl) N a0 a0 (O O y � N O y O O W 0 Q m O O co (D o °U' c o a a U Z Z O E .> N (6 N > +>+ i 0 E 0 E U I (6 y U) N - O L N C d c o N Y > � >�+ N 'y y `o a) E ; vi *- R U m m o O U- FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS H Q ry 0 ry QO O ON O O - O Ln N 00 Ln 00 N O - I- qt O M O O O O O O M I` co O O O M 00 � O - I` O Z Vl N O N N N I,- N - B O O M N N Ln O N N I- �N � (O O - O 00 M 00 00 Ln O � O 00 00 00 - N Ln Ln O 00 C E -4 O M - O O O I,- co N O O M (O 00 q-t I- O Z p C O Lo M M N Ul N co N N Ul N Lo O Lo ~ y LL ce M W � ry nrr ++ C Lo (O C y 00 q-t M M M M J � N E Ln M i � i i i i i i i � � � Q Q u N M N N N N Z •3 Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo ui cr H U W � E a) 2 c U) O cu + � i i i i i i � i i i i i i i � i i i � + •U i V) Lo Lo Lo Lo Ln (B N L r r r r r cu V! H w O O U) V) N V L � O i+ O LL N O O I` O O O O O O O O 00 O Lo O q-t O O O q-t q-t c0 S rr V C O N ' O N O O O N ' ' N N Q L M .0 '- O O N O O O N N N N N L N N O 00 00 00 O N 0 - Co� U LL (3 E E N 0 m N a c0 > N E (7 Lo O N (O Co - O Lo N 00 Lo - - 00 Lo O I- O O cu 0 m co 1` O Lo O O co I,- 00 O O O co O O - N O V) i I` ' O N Nql� C\[- V O O M N N Ln 00 ' M I- ql* y co O 00 O 00 N Lo O H O 00 00 00 - I` Lo Co N O p Co - O - II- co N - - N Lo q-t I` - c y I� M N N M N N N O Ln 00 (7 N M N M C c0 Q V Vl y U N a) p O O cu U N CU O a) +`-• U Vl a-- N � p � L L N C a) a) O L � E as c0 V! Q Vl 4- LL U) CU E O W 0 i Q O C C cu a) a) fn O •> i 7 N O c cu N v! a) O) U V) LL = Vl N 7 C j cB O O i L > > U N O N cu O> •� cu O N a N a) 3 cC O X � a w � � a) = 11 J V! } a) c0 a) p _ +J O i > +cC+ a) O U) E •U) (B O p 0 yr a�i E ° ~ ~ '- c O O a) U Q H H a0ooa a 0- J JQOO aD LL FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Reconciliation of Governmental Fund Balance to Governmental Activities Net Position December 31, 2012 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Governmental Fund Balance 3,979,474 Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds. 10,846,563 Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported in the funds. (1,904,115) Net Position of Governmental Activities 12,921,922 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C4 F--- H Q ry r) � ry Q wcwoo # # LOoocwcc o o c # \ 7 � � QS � ' ES ' 37 % S S S S q ' � E � mnLo � m � o LO N � oN - LO co o n co co a) 2E § $ � ® Gq qkE / k $ $ ^ ^ c Q E J 0 LL C\j C\j C W J ry n _ U 22 § . . . / 7 . \ , , , , , / / � \ \ f p Cl) z § g.t u $ $ � � C) C ? \ N cr H LU E LL� $ § Q E 2 2 co co $ $ \ \ _ , , , , , Cl) Cl) o \ CD i> ` (0 (0 (0 LO LO a) q L E & CN 2 / 2 § _M § ( @ to k � k k 0 U § 0 � Cl) q p p 2 2 \ k $ k @ � , , , # , o , , , , � k 2 ) / Cl) S C) C) - p p $ C) g tM® @ 2 @ 2 4) n n G w LO = 0 U § f LU/ x k c \ 0 ccw o # w LO ooc # ow o n o 2 Cl) r # # LO Cl) wocwwLO - c o o c o w $ � @ 2 M (D N LO o w Nt o o Nt n N w c o # � o £ o Cl) LO (D e co LO � Nt o co LO Nt LO Cl) Cl) co � n = § § % G 2 q k E q $ ® # # ~ P%- 2 � � o � C } Cl) C ƒ CL o \ § E \ / 2 > LU § e m ; » 0 % _ 5 'u 0 0 _ / $ e £ o 5, 0 ¥ 2 = m 2 u 4) g m w r E % 2o [ b § 2 A = LL a0 ■ 7 E c j k ) % _ _ E •� 2 ° •� $ S S = 2 E _ o $ 3 = u % � .- __ = o ) ) g L ° i k 2 S °.E M 2 2 a 2 & 0 M r fe $ eM � % 0 ° - m m E x E % 0 E § .2 2 / 2 '2 ) 2 ° §CL° / \ q f / k x $ a a v o v X 3 � & x § § § w w 0 w LL LL FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Reconciliation of Net Change in Fund Balances to Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Net Change in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (338,864) Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which depreciation exceeded capital outlay during the year. (802,545) Capital contributions are recognized as revenue in the Statement of Activities. This is the total amount contributed during the year. 115,988 Accrued liabilities for employees' sick and vacation are not an expenditure in the governmental funds, but are increases in long- term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. This is the amount that accrued vacation not immediately payable decreased. 1,298 Repayment of capital lease and bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. This is the amount of principal repayments. 222,399 Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities (801,724) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C6 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Statement of Net Position Enterprise Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Total Water Wastewater Enterprise Fund Fund Funds Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 533,730 2,214,758 2,748,488 Utility receivables 146,431 167,609 314,040 Due (to) from fiduciary fund - 922,739 922,739 Due from other governments 8,452 5,062 13,514 Total Current Assets 688,613 3,310,168 3,998,781 Non-current assets: Land 100,000 144,320 244,320 Water rights 19,776 - 19,776 Equipment 353,994 37,385 391,379 Treatment plant and system 14,592,561 14,273,592 28,866,153 Less: Accumulated depreciation (3,517,339) (3,738,771) (7,256,110) Total Non-Current Assets 11,548,992 10,716,526 22,265,518 Total Assets 12,237,605 14,026,694 26,264,299 Liabilities and Fund Equity: Liabilities: Non-current liabilities: Accrued compensated absences 5,936 6,104 12,040 Total Liabilities 5,936 6,104 12,040 Net Position: Net investment in capital assets 11,548,992 10,716,526 22,265,518 Restricted - 930,271 930,271 Unrestricted 682,677 2,373,793 3,056,470 Total Net Position 12,231,669 14,020,590 26,252,259 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C7 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position Enterprise Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Total Enterprise Water Wastewater Funds Operating Revenues: Charges for services 612,705 634,680 1,247,385 Meter sales 2,980 - 2,980 Miscellaneous revenue 3,718 3,110 6,828 Total Operating Revenues 619,403 637,790 1,257,193 Operating Expenses: Personnel 213,660 203,932 417,592 Commodities 134,530 38,062 172,592 Contractual 82,779 158,390 241,169 System development 7,627 - 7,627 Depreciation 396,668 436,344 833,012 Total Operating Expenses 835,264 836,728 1,671,992 Operating Income(Loss) (215,861) (198,938) (414,799) Non-Operating Revenues: Interest revenue 10,698 14,090 24,788 Net Non-Operating Revenues 10,698 14,090 24,788 Income(Loss) before Contributions and Transfers (205,163) (184,848) (390,011) Capital contributions - 15,700 15,700 Transfers(out) (10,000) (10,000) (20,000) Contributions and Transfers (10,000) 5,700 (4,300) Change in Net Position (215,163) (179,148) (394,311) Net Position -Beginning of Year 12,446,832 14,199,738 26,646,570 Net Position -End of Year 12,231,669 14,020,590 26,252,259 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C8 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Statement of Cash Flows Enterprise Funds For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Total Enterprise Water Wastewater Funds Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Cash received from customers 629,763 609,368 1,239,131 Other cash received 23,348 28,422 51,770 Cash received(paid)for deposits (3,515) (50,026) (53,541) Cash payments for goods and services (224,936) (196,452) (421,388) Cash payments for salaries and benefits (215,545) (205,518) (421,063) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 209,115 185,794 394,909 Cash Flows From Non-Capital and Related Financing Activities: Cash transferred to other funds (10,000) (10,000) (20,000) Cash received from non-capital contributions - (8,424) (8,424) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Non-Capital and Related Financing Activities (10,000) (18,424) (28,424) Cash Flows From Capital and Related Financing Activities: Plant investment fees(paid)received - 15,700 15,700 Cash(paid)for assets (114,071) - (114,071) Net Cash Provided (Used) by Capital and Related Financing Activities (114,071) 15,700 (98,371) Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Interest 10,698 14,090 24,788 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities 10,698 14,090 24,788 Net(Decrease)Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 95,742 197,160 292,902 Cash and Cash Equivalents-Beginning of Year 437,988 2,017,598 2,455,586 Cash and Cash Equivalents-End of Year 533,730 2,214,758 2,748,488 Reconciliation of Operating Income(Loss)to Net Cash Provided(Used) by Operating Activities: Operating income(loss) (215,861) (198,938) (414,799) Adjustments: Depreciation 396,668 436,344 833,012 (Increase)decrease in accounts receivable 33,708 - 33,708 Increase(decrease)in accrued compensated absences (1,885) (1,586) (3,471) Increase(decrease)in deposits (3,515) (50,026) (53,541) Total Adjustments 424,976 384,732 809,708 Net Cash Provided(Used)by Operating Activities 209,115 185,794 394,909 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C9 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Statement of Fiduciary Net Position December 31, 2012 Petersen JFOC Agency Agency Fund Fund Total Assets: Cash and cash equivalents - 2,747,624 2,747,624 Accounts receivable, net: - 70,016 70,016 Total Assets - 2,817,640 2,817,640 Liabilities: Accounts payable - 30,130 30,130 Deposits - 2,787,510 2,787,510 Total Liabilities - 2,817,640 2,817,640 Net Position: Held for others - - - The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C10 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Petersen JFOC Agency Agency Fund Fund Total Operating Revenues: Charges for operations and maintenance costs - 432,893 432,893 Charges for professional services reimbursement - 4,722 4,722 Investment income 20 - 20 Grants and contributions 4,409 - 4,409 Transfer in - 145,085 145,085 Total Operating Revenues 4,429 582,700 587,129 Operating Expenses: Salaries and Wages - 161,551 161,551 Employee Benefits - 49,248 49,248 Purchased services - 158,588 158,588 Supplies - 79,280 79,280 Utilities - 134,033 134,033 Capital outlay 16,011 - 16,011 Total Operating Expenses 16,011 582,700 598,711 Change in Net Position (11,582) - (11,582) Due to Others -Beginning 11,582 - 11,582 Due to Others - Ending - - - The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. C11 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A D O �' FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Town of Fraser, Colorado (the "Town") is incorporated under Colorado statutes to provide public safety, highways and streets, water service, health and social services, culture-recreation, public health improvements, planning and zoning, and general administrative services. The Town is located in Grand County and operates under a Council-Manager form of government. An elected Mayor and Town Board are responsible for setting policy, appointing administrative personnel and adopting an annual budget in accordance with state statutes. The Town's major operations include road maintenance, water and wastewater service, public safety and culture and recreation. The Town's financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") is responsible for establishing GAAP for state and local governments through its pronouncements (Statements and Interpretations). Although the Town has the option to apply FASB pronouncements after that date to its business-type activities and enterprise funds, the Town has not chosen to do so. The more significant accounting policies established by GAAP and used by the Town are discussed below. A. Reporting Entity The reporting entity consists of(a)the primary government; i.e., the Town, and (b) organizations for which the Town is financially accountable. The Town is considered financially accountable for legally separate organizations if it is able to appoint a voting majority of an organization's governing body and is either able to impose its will on that organization or there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits, to, or to impose specific financial burdens on, the Town. Consideration is also given to other organizations that are fiscally dependent; i.e., unable to adopt a budget, levy taxes, or issue debt without approval by the Town. Organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the Town are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete are also included in the reporting entity. Based upon the above criteria, the Town is not financially accountable for any other organization, nor is the Town a component unit of any other primary governmental entity. B. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements The Town's basic financial statements include both government-wide (reporting the Town as a whole) and fund financial statements (reporting the Town's major funds). Government-wide financial statements report on information of all of the activities of the Town. Both the government-wide and fund financial statements categorize primary activities as either governmental or business-type. The Town's public safety, public works, culture and recreation, and administration functions are classified as governmental activities. The Water Fund and Wastewater Fund are classified as business-type activities. In the government-wide Statement of Net Position, the governmental activities columns are reported on a full accrual, economic resource basis, which recognizes all long-term assets and receivables as well as long-term debt and obligations. The District's net position are reported in three parts— Net investment in capital assets; Restricted net position; and Unrestricted net position. D1 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) B. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements (continued) The government-wide Statement of Activities reports both the gross and net cost of each of the Town's governmental functions and business-type activities. The governmental functions are also supported by general government revenues (sales taxes, property and specific ownership taxes, investment earnings, etc.). The Statement of Activities reduces gross expenses (including depreciation) by related program revenues, operating and capital grants. Program revenues must be directly associated with the governmental function or a business-type activity. Operating grants include operating-specific and discretionary (either operating or capital) grants while the capital grants column reflects capital-specific grants. The government-wide focus is on the sustainability of the Town as an entity and the change in the Town's net position resulting from the current year's activities. C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation Measurement focus refers to whether financial statements measure changes in current resources only (current financial focus) or changes in both current and long-term resources (long-term economic focus). Basis of accounting refers to the point at which revenues, expenditures, or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Financial statement presentation refers to classification of revenues by source and expenses by function. 1. Long-term Economic Focus and Accrual Basis Both governmental and business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements and the proprietary fund financial statements use the long-term economic focus and are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. 2. Current Financial Focus and Modified Accrual Basis The governmental fund financial statements use the current financial focus and are presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded when susceptible to accrual; i.e., both measurable and available. "Available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter(60 days) to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Expenditures are generally recognized when the related liability is incurred. The exception to this general rule is that principal and interest on general long-term debt and compensated absences are recorded only when payment is due. Franchise fees, licenses and interest associated with current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenue of the current fiscal period. Sales and lodging taxes collected by vendors at year end on behalf of the Town are also recognized as revenue if collected within 30 days after year end. Expenditure driven grants are recognized as revenue when qualified expenditures have been incurred and all other grant requirements have been met. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the Town. D2 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (continued) 3. Financial Statement Presentation As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are payments where the amounts are reasonably equivalent to the value of the interfund services provided and other charges between the functions of the Town. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the water and wastewater functions. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers and applicants for goods, services or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non- operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the Town's enterprise funds are the operation of the water and wastewater systems within the Town. Operating expenses for the enterprise funds includes operating expenses and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses. D. Fund Financial Statements The financial transactions of the Town are reported in individual funds in the fund financial statements. Each fund is accounted for by providing a separate set of self- balancing accounts that comprises its assets, liabilities, reserves, fund equity, revenues and expenditures/expenses. The fund focus is on current available resources and budget compliance. The Town reports the following major governmental funds: General Fund The General Fund is the Town's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the Town, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. The term "proceeds of specific revenue sources" establishes that one or more specific restricted or committed revenues should be the foundation for a special revenue fund. The Conservation Trust Fund accounts for lottery proceeds required to be expended solely on park and recreation improvements. D3 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) D. Fund Financial Statements (continued) Capital Projects Funds Capital projects funds are used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets. Capital projects funds exclude those types of capital-related outflows financed by proprietary funds or for assets that will be held in trust for individuals, private organizations, or other governments. The Capital Equipment Replacement Fund accounts for funds set aside for the purchase and replacement of capital equipment. A significant portion of revenues consists of highway user tax proceeds. Debt Service Funds Debt service funds are used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures of principal and interest. Debt service funds should be used to report resources if legally mandated. Financial resources that are being accumulated for principal and interest maturing in future years also should be reported in debt service funds. The Debt Service Fund accounts for payments made on the Town's bonded debt obligations. The Town reports the following proprietary or business-type funds: The Water Fund accounts for the purchase and delivery of water to the citizens of the Town. The Water Fund also maintains the infrastructure needed to provide water service. The Wastewater Fund accounts for the treatment of wastewater from the citizens of the Town. The Wastewater Fund also maintains the infrastructure needed to provide wastewater service. The Town reports the following fiduciary funds: The Petersen Agency Fund accounts for funds held for the Peterson Trust council whose members are designated to determine the appropriate expenditure of the trust balance. The Joint Facilities Oversight Committee ("JFOC') Operations Fund accounts for the operations of the Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Treatment Joint Facilities. E. Financial Statement Accounts 1. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Town pools deposits and investments of all funds except JFOC Operations Fund, which are held in separate accounts. Each fund's share of the pool is readily identified by the Town's internal records. Investments are stated at market value. Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits, certificates of deposit, local government investment pools (COLOTRUST), and U.S. government-backed securities. D4 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) E. Financial Statement Accounts (continued) 1. Cash and Cash Equivalents (continued) Certain proceeds of debt issues, as well as certain resources set aside for their repayment, have been classified as restricted assets on the balance sheet because their use is limited by the applicable covenants. Restricted assets also include certain deposits that have been limited as to usage pursuant to escrow and similar agreements. 2. Receivables Receivables are reported net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. 3. Property Taxes Property taxes are assessed in one year as a lien on the property, but not collected by the governmental units until the subsequent year. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the assessed but uncollected property taxes have been recorded as a receivable and as deferred inflow of resources. 4. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include land, buildings, equipment, vehicles, and infrastructure assets (only infrastructure acquired after January 1, 2002), are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activity columns in the government-wide financial statements. The Town defines capital assets as assets with an initial cost of$5,000 or more and an estimated useful life in excess of two years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair value at the date of donation. Capital outlay for projects is capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase is capitalized as part of the value of the assets constructed in the business-type activities. Infrastructure, buildings, and equipment are depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Years Infrastructure 15 -30 Buildings and improvements 15 -40 Distribution systems 40 Equipment and vehicles 7 D5 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) E. Financial Statement Accounts (continued) 5. Compensated Absences Vested or accumulated vacation leave that is expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources is reported as an expenditure and a fund liability of the obligated governmental fund. Amounts of vested or accumulated vacation leave that are not expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources are reported in the governmental activities column in the government-wide financial statements. Vested or accumulated vacation leave of the proprietary fund type is recorded as an expense and liability of that fund as the benefits accrue to employees. In accordance with the provisions of GASB No. 16, Accounting for Compensated Absences, no liability is recorded for non-vesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits. 6. Restricted Assets Certain proceeds of the Town's government fund general obligation bonds, as well as certain resources set aside for their repayment, are classified as restricted assets on the balance sheet because their use is limited by applicable bond covenants. Fees collected for park and affordable housing impact fees are restricted as to their use by Town ordinances. Debt service property tax collected in excess of the debt service of the general obligation series 1998 bonds is reserved for emergency and catastrophic road failure, future debt service or early redemption of the bond. 7. Deferred outflows/inflows of resources In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The government doesn't have any deferred outflows of resources at December 31, 2012. In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The government has only one type of item that qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, Unavailable revenue—property taxes is deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period that the amounts become available. D6 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) E. Financial Statement Accounts (continued) 8. Categories and Classification of Fund Balance Governmental accounting standards establishes fund balance classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which a government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported in governmental funds. Fund balance classifications, include Non-spendable, Restricted, Committed, Assigned, and Unassigned. These classifications reflect not only the nature of funds, but also provide clarity to the level of restriction placed upon fund balance. Fund Balance can have different levels of restraint, such as external versus internal compliance requirements. Unassigned fund balance is a residual classification within the general fund. The general fund should be the only fund that reports a positive unassigned balance. In all other funds, unassigned is limited to negative residual fund balance. The Town of Fraser classifies governmental fund balances as follows: Non-spendable- includes fund balance amounts that cannot be spent either because it is not in spendable form or because of legal or contractual requirements. Spendable: Restricted— includes fund balance amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by providers, such as creditors or amounts constrained due to constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Committed— includes fund balance amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by the government through formal action of the highest level of decision making authority which is the Town Board. Assigned— includes spendable fund balance amounts that are intended to be used for specific purposes that are neither considered restricted or committed. Fund Balance may be assigned by the Town or its management designee. Unassigned- includes residual positive fund balance within the General Fund which has not been classified within the other above mentioned categories. Unassigned fund balance may also include negative balances for any governmental fund if expenditures exceed amounts restricted, committed, or assigned for those specific purposes. The Town may use restricted amounts to be spent first when both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available unless there are legal documents/contracts that prohibit doing this, such as in grant agreements requiring dollar for dollar spending. Additionally, the Town might first use committed, then assigned, and lastly unassigned amounts of unrestricted fund balance when expenditures are made. The Town does not have a formal minimum fund balance policy. However, the Town's budget includes a calculation of a targeted reserve position and the Administration calculates targets and reports them annually to the Town Board. D7 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) I. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) E. Financial Statement Accounts (continued) 9. Interfund Transactions Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures or expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures or expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures or expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. 10. Deposits Deposits on the JFOC Operations Fund represent contributions made to the JFOC operations fund by Winter Park Ranch Water and Sanitation District ("Winter Park Ranch") and Grand County Water and Sanitation District#1 ("Grand County#1") and the Town (previously the Fraser Sanitation District) for operating and replacement costs relating to the combined wastewater treatment plant. These deposits are held for working capital and replacement costs during the time all Districts remain joint operators of the plant. F. Significant Accounting Policies 1. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Town's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amount of revenues and expenditures or expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 2. Proprietary Funds As required by GASB Statement No. 62, the Town has elected to follow all GASB pronouncements for its proprietary funds. 3. Credit Risk Receivables in the Town's funds are primarily due from other governments. Management believes that the credit risk related to these receivables is minimal. 4. Restricted and Unrestricted Resources When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the government's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. D8 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) II. Reconciliation of Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements A. Explanation of certain differences between the governmental fund Balance Sheet and the government-wide Statement of Net Position The governmental fund Balance Sheet includes reconciliation between fund balance - total governmental funds and net position of governmental activities as reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position. One element of that reconciliation explains that"Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds." The $10,846,559 represents the book value of assets at December 31, 2012. Another element of that reconciliation states that "Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported in the funds." The details of this $1,904,115 difference represent accrued compensated absences, sales and use tax revenue bonds, general obligation bonds, and capital leases payable at year end. B. Explanation of certain differences between the governmental fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances and the government-wide Statement of Activities The governmental fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances includes reconciliation between net change in fund balances of governmental funds and changes in net position of governmental activities as reported in the government-wide Statement of Activities. One element of that reconciliation explains that "Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, the costs of those assets are allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense". The details of this $802,545 difference are capital outlay of $28,264 less depreciation expense of$830,809. Also, repayment of long-term obligations of$222,399 is shown as an expenditure in the governmental fund, but is not reflected in the Statement of Activities. III. Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability A. Budgetary Information Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, except for the proprietary funds. Annual appropriations are adopted for all funds. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations at the fund level. All appropriations lapse at year end. As required by Colorado Statutes, the Town followed the required timetable noted below in preparing, approving, and enacting its budget for 2012. (1) For the 2012 budget year, prior to August 25, 2011, the County Assessor sent to the Town an assessed valuation of all taxable property within the Town's boundaries. (2) The Town Manager, or other qualified person appointed by the Board, submitted to the Board, on or before October 15, 2011, a recommended budget which detailed the necessary property taxes needed along with other available revenues to meet the Town's operating requirements. D9 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) III. Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability(continued) A. Budgetary Information (continued) (3) Prior to December 15, 2011, a public hearing was held for the budget, the Board certified to the County Commissioners a levy rate that derived the necessary property taxes as computed in the proposed budget, and the Board adopted the proposed budget and an appropriating resolution that legally appropriated expenditures for the upcoming year. (4) After adoption of the budget resolution, the Town may make the following changes: a) it may transfer appropriated money between funds; b) approve supplemental appropriations to the extent of revenues in excess of estimated revenues in the budget; c) approve emergency appropriations; and d) reduce appropriations for which originally estimated revenues are insufficient. Taxes levied in one year are collected in the succeeding year. Thus, taxes certified in 2011 were collected in 2012 and taxes certified in 2012 will be collected in 2013. Taxes are due on January 1 st in the year of collection; however, they may be paid in either one installment (no later than April 30th) or two equal installments (not later than February 28th and June 15th)without interest or penalty. Taxes that are not paid within the prescribed time bear interest at the rate of one percent (1%) per month until paid. Unpaid amounts and the accrued interest thereon become delinquent on June 16th. During the year, the Town approved the following budget amendments: Original Final Fund Budget Budget Amendment General $ 3,009,752 $ 3,034,752 $ 25,000 Debt Service 305,727 130,727 (175,000) Conservation Trust - 15,337 15,337 B. TABOR Amendment In November 1992, Colorado voters amended Article X of the Colorado Constitution by adding Section 20, commonly known as the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights ("TABOR). TABOR contains revenue, spending, tax and debt limitations that apply to the State of Colorado and local governments. TABOR requires, with certain exceptions, advance voter approval for any new tax, tax rate increase, mill levy above that for the prior year, extension of any expiring tax, or tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any local government. Except for refinancing bonded debt at a lower interest rate or adding new employees to existing pension plans, TABOR requires advance voter approval for the creation of any multiple-fiscal year debt or other financial obligation unless adequate present cash reserves are pledged irrevocably and held for payments in all future fiscal years. TABOR also requires local governments to establish an emergency reserve to be used for declared emergencies only. The reserve is calculated at 3% of fiscal year spending. Fiscal year spending excludes bonded debt service and enterprise spending. The Town has reserved $80,000. D10 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) III. Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability(continued) B. TABOR Amendment (continued) On April 4, 2000, the Town's electorate approved the following: Without any increase in the property tax mill levy or the 4% sales and use tax rate, shall the Town of Fraser, Colorado, be authorized, in the year 2000 and each subsequent year thereafter, to collect, retain, and expend the full proceeds of the Town's fees, taxes, non-federal grants and other revenues and to spend such revenues for debt service, municipal operations, capital projects, and any other lawful municipal purpose, notwithstanding any state of Colorado restrictions on revenues or spending, including the restrictions of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, the revenue limit in Section 29-1-301 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, or any other law. The Town's management believes it is in compliance with the financial provisions of TABOR. However, TABOR is complex and subject to interpretation. Many of its provisions, including the interpretation of how to calculate fiscal year spending limits, could require judicial interpretation. IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds A. Deposits The Town's checking accounts are entirely covered by federal depository insurance ("FDIC") or by collateral held under Colorado's Public Deposit Protection Act ("PDPA"). The FDIC insures the first$250,000 of the Town's deposits at each financial institution. Deposit balances over$250,000 are collateralized as required by PDPA. The carrying amount of the Town's demand deposits was $30,809 at year end. The Town had the following deposits and investments for all funds except the JFOC Operations Fund, with the following maturities December 31, 2012: Maturities Carrying Less Than Less Than Type: Rating Amount One Year Five Years Deposits: Checking Accounts Not Rated $ 30,809 30,809 - Investments: Cash with fiscal agent 14,808 14,808 Investment Pools AAAm 6,563,915 6,563,915 - $ 6,609,532 D11 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) A. Deposits (continued) The Town had the following deposits and investments for the JFOC Operations Fund with the following maturities December 31, 2012: Maturities Carrying Less Than Less Than Type: Rating Amount One Year Five Years Deposits: Certificates of Deposit Not Rated 2,080,071 942,905 1,137,166 Checking Accounts Not Rated 340,259 340,259 Savings Accounts Not Rated 138,652 138,652 Investments: Investment Pools AAAm 188,642 188,642 $ 2,747,624 The investment pools represent investments in the Colorado Government Liquid Asset Trust ("COLOTRUST") a 2a7-like pools. Pools are not covered by FDIC insurance or PDPA but are rated AAAm. The fair value of the pools is determined by the pools'share price. The Town has no regulatory oversight for the pools. Interest Rate Risk. As a means of limiting its exposure to interest rate risk, the Town coordinates its investment maturities to closely match cash flow needs and restricts the maximum investment term to less than five years from the purchase date. As a result of the limited length of maturities the Town has limited its interest rate risk. Credit Risk. Colorado statutes specify instruments in which local governments may invest, including: • Obligations of the U.S. and certain U.S. governmental agency securities • Certain international agency securities • General obligation and revenue bonds for U.S. local governmental entities • Bankers acceptances of certain banks • Commercial paper • Local government investment pools • Written repurchase agreements collateralized by certain authorized securities • Certain money market funds • Guaranteed investment contracts The Town's general investment policy is to apply the prudent-person rule: Investments are made as a prudent person would be expected to act, with discretion and intelligence, to seek reasonable income, preserve capital, and, in general, avoid speculative investments. D12 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) A. Deposits (continued) At December 31, 2012, cash has been restricted for the following purposes: 1998 Sales Tax Revenue Bond Reserves $ 155,000 2002 Sales Tax Revenue Bond Reserves 20,000 1998 General Obligation Bond Reserves 40,000 Additional debt service reserve 85,000 Total Restricted Cash $ 300,000 B. Receivables Receivables as of year-end for the Town's funds, including applicable allowances for uncollectible accounts, are as follows: Governmental Funds Debt Capital General Service Equipment Total Receivables: Property Taxes $ 218,291 80,000 - 298,291 Accounts 77,648 - - 77,648 Intergovernmental 300,453 - 3,346 303,799 Gross receivables 669,427 80,000 3,346 752,773 Less: allowance for uncollectible 20,410 - - 20,410 Net Receivables $ 649,017 80,000 3,346 732,363 Water Wastewater Operations Operations Total Receivables: Accounts $ 146,434 $ 167,609 $ 314,043 Gross receivables 146,434 167,609 314,043 Less: allowance for uncollectible - - $ - Net Receivables $ 146,434 $ 167,609 $ 314,043 Governmental funds report deferred inflow of resources from property taxes in connection with receivables for revenues that are not considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. This includes $298,291 of property taxes levied in 2012 but not available until 2013. D13 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) C. Capital Assets Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2012 was as follows: Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance Governmental activities: Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land and improvements $ 1,237,355 - - 1,237,355 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 1,237,355 - - 1,237,355 Capital assets, being depreciated: Infrastructure 14,217,165 144,252 - 14,361,417 Buildings 1,144,852 - - 1,144,852 Furniture and equipment 1,372,895 - - 1,372,895 Total capital assets, being depreciated 16,734,912 144,252 - 16,879,164 Less accumulated depreciation for: Infrastructure (4,565,486) (699,248) - (5,264,734) Buildings (716,322) (45,862) - (762,184) Furniture and equipment (1,157,343) (85,699) - (1,243,042) Total accumulated depreciation (6,439,151) (830,809) - (7,269,960) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 10,295,761 (686,557) - 9,609,204 Governmental activities capital assets, net $11,533,116 (686,557) - 10,846,559 D14 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) C. Capital Assets (continued) Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance Business-type activities: Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land $ 244,320 - - 244,320 Water rights 19,776 - - 19,776 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 264,096 - - 264,096 Capital assets, being depreciated: System and improvements 22,724,180 - (12,600) 22,711,580 Buildings and improvements 6,143,045 11,529 - 6,154,574 Equipment 275,412 115,966 - 391,378 Total capital assets, being depreciated 29,142,637 127,495 (12,600) 29,257,532 Less accumulated depreciation for: System and improvements (4,983,348) (651,520) - (5,634,868) Buildings and improvements (1,343,274) (157,051) - (1,500,325) Equipment (96,476) (24,440) - (120,916) Total accumulated depreciation (6,423,098) (833,011) - (7,256,109) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 22,719,539 (705,516) (12,600) 22,001,423 Governmental activities capital assets, net $22,983,635 (705,516) (12,600) 22,265,519 In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Town has elected to report general government infrastructure assets prospectively. Therefore, only general government infrastructure assets acquired since January 1, 2002 are included in the Town's financial statements. The Town had the following capital outlay and depreciation expense for the following functions: Depreciation Capital Expense Outlay Governmental activities: General government $ 41,363 - Public works, including infrastructure 727,975 28,264 Public safety 14,084 - Culture and recreation 47,387 - Total governmental activities $ 830,809 28,264 Business-type activities: Water $ 396,668 114,071 Wastewater 436,344 13,424 Total business-type activities $ 833,012 127,495 D15 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) D. Interfund Receivables, Payables, and Transfers Transfers were as follows: In Out General $ 15,337 (408,440) Debt Service 247,250 (175,000) Conservation Trust - (15,337) Capital Equipment 106,190 - Capital Asset Fund 250,000 - Wastewater - (10,000) Water - (10,000) $ 618,777 (618,777) Transfers were to provide additional resources to meet the activities provided in each fund. E. Other Liabilities 1. Capital Leases -FRODO Property In April 2008, the Town entered into a capital lease agreement for the purchase of property within Town limits. The total amount financed was $485,725, with interest stated at 4.90% per annum. The lease requires semi-annual payments of$18,187, and requires payments through 2028. Future minimum lease payments are as follows: Year Principal Interest Total 2013 18,342 20,032 38,374 2014 19,252 19,122 38,374 2015 20,207 18,167 38,374 2016 21,209 17,165 38,374 2017 22,261 16,113 38,374 2018 -2022 129,005 62,864 191,869 2023 -2027 164,333 27,535 191,868 2028 18,727 459 19,186 Total $ 413,336 181,457 594,793 D16 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) E. Other Liabilities (continued) 2. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds In 1992, the Town issued Series 1992 Sales and Use Tax Bonds with a gross issue price of$1,145,000. This issue was partially ($525,000) refunded with the issuance $2,215,000 of Series 1998 Sales and Use Tax bonds. The proceeds not used for refunding the 1992 Sales and Use Tax Bonds were used for street improvements and paving. In 2002, the remaining outstanding balance of the 1992 Bond issue was refunded through the issuance of the 2002 Sales and Use Tax Refunding Bonds. The Series 1998 Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as follows: • June 1, 2009 and thereafter, subject to redemption at 100%. Interest for both the 1998 Bonds and 2002 Bonds are payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 at 5.05%. Principal payments are made December 1. The required reserves are accounted for in the Town's Debt Service Fund. 3. General Obligation Bonds In 1998, the Town issued $600,000 in Series 1998 General Obligation Bonds. The bonds are secured by the full faith and credit of the Town and pay interest at 4.25% to 5.1%. The bonds were issued to finance improvements to the Town's streets, roads, sidewalks and other infrastructure. 4. Advance Refunding The Town has advance refunded the 1992 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds. Sufficient U.S. government, state and local government securities were placed in an irrevocable trust for the purpose of generating resources for all future debt service payments of the refunded debt. As a result, the refunded bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability has been removed from the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. The amount of defeased bonds outstanding at year end is not readily determinable. 5. Bonded Debt The Town's annual bonded debt service is as follows: Year Principal Interest Total 2013 225,000 74,433 299,433 2014 235,000 62,048 297,048 2015 250,000 49,073 299,073 2016 270,000 35,016 305,016 2017 490,000 14,597 504,597 Total $ 1,470,000 235,167 1,705,167 D17 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) E. Other Liabilities (continued) 6. Long-term Debt The Town's annual debt service requirements are as follows: Year Principal Interest Total 2013 $ 243,342 94,465 337,807 2014 254,252 81,170 335,422 2015 270,207 67,240 337,447 2016 291,209 52,181 343,390 2017 512,261 30,710 542,971 2018 -2022 129,005 62,864 191,869 2023 -2027 164,333 27,535 191,868 2028 18,727 459 19,186 Total $ 1,883,336 416,624 2,299,960 7. Accrued Compensated Absences Earned but unused vacation benefits amounted to $20,779 at December 31, 2012. All unused vacation benefits are recorded on the government-wide financial statements. 8. Schedule of Changes in Long-term Debt Balance Balance Due Within 1/1/12 Additions Reductions 12/31/12 One Year Capital leases $ 430,811 (17,475) 413,336 18,342 Sales and use tax bonds 1,425,000 - (175,000) 1,250,000 185,000 General obligation bonds 260,000 - (40,000) 220,000 40,000 Accrued compensated absences 22,075 - (1,296) 20,779 - Total $ 2,137,886 - (233,771) 1,904,115 243,342 D18 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) IV. Detailed Notes on All Funds (continued) F. Restricted Fund Balance The Town had the following restrictions on the fund balances at December 31, 2012: Balance Balance 1/1/12 Additions Deletions 12/31/12 General Fund: Fees in lieu of Park $ 6,379 - - 6,379 Affordable housing impact fee 135,426 - - 135,426 Emergency reserves 70,000 10,000 - 80,000 Debt Service Fund reserves: Next year's payments 300,000 - - 300,000 Conservation Trust Fund 25,046 6,168 (15,337) 15,877 Wastewater Fund Operating reserve 52,364 631 (7,925) 45,070 Capital replacement reserve 839,295 59,331 (13,425) 885,201 $ 1,428,510 $ 76,130 $ (36,687) $ 1,467,953 The Town had $930,271 restricted in the Wastewater Fund for Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Treatment Joint Facilities operating and capital replacement expenses. G. Committed Fund Balance The Town has committed $262,246 in the debt service fund to be used for capital projects. H. Assigned Fund Balance The Town had the following assignments of the governmental fund balances at December 31, 2012: Balance Balance 1/1/12 Additions Deletions 12/31/12 General Fund: Reserve savings $ 750,000 - - 750,000 Capital projects 59,300 250,290 (269,524) 40,066 Future budget deficit 762,752 - (595,458) 167,294 Capital Equipment Replacement: Capital projects 411,752 116,179 - 527,931 $ 1,983,804 366,469 (864,982) 1,485,291 D19 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) V. Other Information A. Joint Facilities Oversight Committee ("JFOC") Operations Fund In 2002, the Fraser Sanitation District (the "District"), Winter Park Ranch, and Grand County#1 entered into an agreement to participate in the joint construction, maintenance, and operation of joint interceptor sewer lines and joint sewage treatment facilities. This new wastewater treatment plant has been constructed on the existing plant site of the District/Winter Park Ranch treatment facility and a new and/or expanded sewer trunk line from Grand County#1 will connect with the existing District/Winter Park Ranch interceptor line. Title of the new joint facilities will be allocated among these three members based on each member's proportionate share of equivalent residential units to be serviced by the new plant. The District was dissolved into the Town effective December 31, 2009. Construction costs of these new facilities, excluding expenses relating to segment B of the joint trunk lines ("B-Line") described below, are based on each member's future share of equivalent residential units to be serviced by the new plant and are allocated as follows: Town —34.07% Winter Park Ranch —28.89% Grand County#1 —37.04% Under the Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Agreement, a Joint Facilities Oversight Committee ("JFOC") was established to represent the three members regarding the construction, expansion, operations, management, and maintenance of the new joint facilities. The JFOC is comprised of a total of nine members, with each member having three members. The Town was appointed as the manager of the joint facilities for 2012. The JFOC may designate a new manager on an annual basis. In 2012, as approved by the JFOC, the Town earned $28,422 in management fees. Operations and maintenance costs will be allocated among the three members based on each member's proportionate share of equivalent residential units currently serviced by the new plant. In addition, upon certification of the new joint facilities, this agreement requires the establishment of an operations and maintenance reserve fund equal to three months operations and maintenance costs and a capital replacement reserve fund, the amount which is determined by the JFOC. 1. Maryvale Village (Rendezvous) The District entered an agreement on May 9, 2000, with Maryvale Village, L.L.C., and several individuals (collectively referred to as the "Rendezvous"), Maryvale Commercial Metropolitan District, and Maryvale Residential Metropolitan District (these districts are collectively referred to as the "Maryvale Districts")that permitted the inclusion of the Maryvale development within the District's boundaries in order to receive sanitation services, in exchange for inclusion fees. Pursuant to this agreement, Rendezvous and the Maryvale Districts are responsible for the construction of sewer main extensions and related infrastructure from the existing District sewer main to the Maryvale development. These sewer main extensions and related infrastructure will ultimately be conveyed to the District at the time these projects are completed or begin to be used, whichever comes first, subject to the District's acceptance of these assets. As of December 31, 2012, Maryvale development sewer mains and infrastructure had been conveyed to the District, and is presented as an asset on the Town's financial statements. D20 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) V. Other Information (continued) A. Joint Facilities Oversight Committee ("JFOC") Operations Fund (continued) 1. Maryvale Village (Rendezvous) (continued) Per this agreement, in exchange for the District agreeing to oversize the new wastewater treatment plant described earlier, the Developer and Maryvale Districts agreed to cover the amount of any shortfall in the District's CWRPDA loan payments by pre-purchasing tap fees. In addition, this agreement requires the Developer and Maryvale Districts to establish an escrow account in the amount of$160,000 to guarantee their compliance in the event of a default regarding their pre-purchase obligations. As of December 31, 2012, no prepaid tap fees have been required or made by the Developer and the Maryvale Districts. This guarantee was released in 2009. 2. Pre-Inclusion Agreement -Cornerstone The District entered an agreement on April 5, 2005, with Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, L.L.C. ("Cornerstone") that permits the inclusion of a portion of Cornerstone's development within the District's boundaries in order to receive sanitation services for inclusion fees. Cornerstone shall be responsible for constructing, paying for and installing all sewer lines and any related facilities within the property including all lines, manholes and mains. This infrastructure will ultimately be conveyed to the District at the time these projects are completed or begin to be used, whichever comes first, subject to the District's acceptance of these assets. B. Retirement Plans - Deferred Compensation Plan—Section 457 The Town offers its employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits employees to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property, or rights are to be held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the plan participants and their beneficiaries. The accrual basis of accounting is used for the plan. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenditures are recognized when incurred. Investments are recorded at market value. Plan investment purchases are determined by the plan participant and therefore, the plan's investment concentration varies between participants. The Town has no liability for losses under the plan but does have the duty of due care that would be required of an ordinary prudent investor. The Town is neither the trustee nor the administrator for the plan. D21 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) V. Other Information (continued) C. Retirement Plans—CCOERA Retirement Plan —Section 401(a) The Town participates in the Colorado County Officials & Employees Retirement Association ("CCOERA") retirement plan (the "401(a) Plan"). CCOERA was established to provide retirement benefits to employees of Colorado local governments. Employees of the Town are required to participate in the 401(a) Plan after one full year of service. The CCOERA retirement plan was adopted in accordance with section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Each eligible employee is required to contribute 4% of gross wages to the 401(a) Plan. The Town matches employee contributions at the same rate and these matched dollars vest over a 5 year period. The Town is neither the trustee nor the administrator for the 401(a) Plan. D. Other Employee Benefits -Post Employment Health Care Benefits All Town employees covered by State continuation insurance may continue their health insurance due to a reduction in work hours or termination of employment (for reasons other than "gross misconduct") for up to 18 months after the occurrence of one of these events. Eligible dependents may continue coverage for up to 36 months. Employees who elect continued coverage must pay the Town for premiums from the termination date of coverage and monthly thereafter. No cost to the Town is recognized as employees reimburse 100% of their premium cost. E. Commitments and Contingencies -Contracts In lieu of directly providing public safety services, the Town has entered into an agreement with the Town of Winter Park, Colorado to form a joint public safety force effective May 1, 2005. The agreement requires costs to be split based upon average call volume. F. Risk Management The Town is exposed to various risks of loss related to workers' compensation, general liability, and worker unemployment. The Town has acquired commercial coverage for these risks. Any settled claims are not expected to exceed the commercial insurance coverage. The Town is also exposed to the risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; and errors and omissions. The Town is a member of the insurance pool described below to cover these risks. Pursuant to an inter-local agreement authorized by state statute, the Town joined the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency ("CIRSA") to provide insurance coverage. Members of the board of directors are nominated and elected by members to two-year, staggered terms and meet at least monthly to direct operations. CIRSA budgets are funded by contributions from member governments. D22 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) V. Other Information (continued) F. Risk Management (continued) The Town's share of assets, liabilities and fund equity as of December 31, 2012, the latest date for which information is available, is as follows: Insurance Pools: Fraser Share Property and Casualty Pool: Loss fund 18,480 Operating 6,607 Pooled excess fund 5,617 Reserve fund 15,863 Workers' Compensation Pool: Loss fund 1,682 Operating 891 Pooled excess fund 2,308 Reserve fund 11,449 The December 31, 2012 combined financial information is as follows: Cash and investments $ 69,999,168 Other assets 7,475,570 Total $ 77,474,738 Liabilities $ 40,063,159 Members fund balance 37,411,579 Total $ 77,474,738 Total revenue $ 22,214,452 Total expense (18,419,583) (Deficiency)of Revenue Over Expense $ 3,794,869 Coverage provided by CIRSA is as follows: 1) $250,000 per claim/occurrence property; 2) $1,000,000 per claim/occurrence liability; and 3) $150,000 per claim/occurrence crime. CIRSA has also acquired additional excess coverage from outside sources. The Town may be liable for any losses in excess of the above coverage. At December 31, 2012, the Town does not expect to incur losses in excess of the above coverage. Surpluses or deficits for any year are subject to change for reasons which include: interest earnings on invested amounts for those years and funds, re-estimation of losses for those years and funds, and credits or distributions from surplus for those years and funds. D23 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2012 (Continued) V. Other Information (continued) G. Prepaid Plant Investment Fees The Town entered into annexation agreements with two developers that provided for the use of Plant Investment Fees to fund water system capital improvements within the developments. The agreements essentially provide that the Town will not retain Plant Investment Fees paid by building permit applicants within these developments until such time as the total Plant Investment Fees paid exceeds the certified costs of regional water capital improvements within the developments. Currently the developers have certified water regional infrastructure improvements totaling $6,266,976 and a total of$2,080,293 of Plant Investment Fees have been rebated to the developers. D24 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION J COLORADO �_\ FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado General Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget(GAAP Basis)and Actual For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Taxes 1,878,500 1,878,500 1,956,338 77,838 2,000,742 Licenses and fees 10,500 10,500 13,658 3,158 13,774 Charges for services 5,000 5,000 5,247 247 23,972 Interest 4,050 4,050 6,540 2,490 3,597 Other revenue 99,000 99,000 217,054 118,054 105,604 Total Revenues 1,997,050 1,997,050 2,198,837 201,787 2,147,689 Expenditures: General government 973,932 973,932 925,475 48,457 794,615 Public safety 395,000 395,000 372,060 22,940 378,336 Public works 1,161,495 1,186,495 1,009,330 177,165 772,351 Culture and recreation 23,700 23,700 9,478 14,222 40,842 Debt service 38,375 38,375 38,374 1 73,605 Total Expenditures 2,592,502 2,617,502 2,354,717 262,785 2,059,749 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenditures (595,452) (620,452) (155,880) 464,572 87,940 Other Financing Sources(Uses): Transfer in 250,000 250,000 265,337 15,337 156,327 Transfer(out) (417,250) (417,250) (408,440) 8,810 (424,317) Total Other Financing (Uses) (167,250) (167,250) (143,103) 24,147 (267,990) Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenditures and Other Financing Sources(Uses) (762,702) (787,702) (298,983) 488,719 (180,050) Fund Balances-Beginning of Year 2,117,144 2,117,144 3,172,403 1,055,259 3,352,453 Fund Balances-End of Year 1,354,442 1,329,442 2,873,420 1,543,978 3,172,403 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. E1 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado General Fund Schedule of Revenues Budget(GAAP Basis) and Actual For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Taxes: Property 216,500 216,500 217,361 861 268,530 Specific ownership 8,000 8,000 9,186 1,186 9,277 Sales&use 1,605,000 1,605,000 1,670,712 65,712 1,667,863 Franchise 40,000 40,000 49,521 9,521 45,832 Motor vehicle 4,000 4,000 4,477 477 4,412 Cigarette 5,000 5,000 5,081 81 4,828 Total 1,878,500 1,878,500 1,956,338 77,838 2,000,742 Licenses and Fees: Business license fees 9,000 9,000 10,980 1,980 8,520 Liquor license fee 1,500 1,500 2,678 1,178 5,254 Total 10,500 10,500 13,658 3,158 13,774 Charges for services: Planning and building fees 5,000 5,000 5,247 247 23,972 Total 5,000 5,000 5,247 247 23,972 Interest: Earnings on deposits 4,050 4,050 6,540 2,490 3,597 Total 4,050 4,050 6,540 2,490 3,597 Other: Other income 90,000 90,000 208,029 118,029 93,354 Rents 9,000 9,000 9,025 25 12,250 Total 99,000 99,000 217,054 118,054 105,604 Other Financing Sources: Transfer in 250,000 250,000 265,337 15,337 156,327 Total 250,000 250,000 265,337 15,337 156,327 Total Revenues 2,247,050 2,247,050 2,464,174 217,124 2,304,016 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. E2 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado General Fund Schedule of Expenditures and Transfers Budget(GAAP Basis) and Actual For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual General Government: Town board salaries 38,989 38,989 24,501 14,488 31,596 Town board community enhancement 235,115 235,115 195,967 39,148 157,471 Miscellaneous 2,500 2,500 2,818 (318) 2,391 Administrative salaries 297,313 297,313 269,999 27,314 257,079 Other purchased services 341,015 341,015 396,562 (55,547) 307,088 Utilities 23,000 23,000 15,995 7,005 15,665 Property management 36,000 36,000 19,633 16,367 23,325 Total General Government 973,932 973,932 925,475 48,457 794,615 Public Safety 395,000 395,000 372,060 22,940 378,336 Total Public Safety 395,000 395,000 372,060 22,940 378,336 Public Works Salaries and benefits 526,495 526,495 451,103 75,392 371,998 Other purchased services 148,000 148,000 163,887 (15,887) 159,159 Utilities 16,000 16,000 8,621 7,379 8,746 Property management 71,000 71,000 50,469 20,531 13,145 Capital outlay 400,000 425,000 335,250 89,750 219,303 Total Public Works 1,161,495 1,186,495 1,009,330 177,165 772,351 Culture and Recreation Salaries and benefits - - - - 6,072 Other purchased services 18,500 18,500 6,012 12,488 31,002 Utilities 3,200 3,200 2,711 489 1,583 Property management 2,000 2,000 755 1,245 2,185 Total Culture and Recreation 23,700 23,700 9,478 14,222 40,842 Debt Services Interest 20,899 20,899 20,899 - 23,150 Principal 17,476 17,476 17,475 1 50,455 Total Debt Services 38,375 38,375 38,374 1 73,605 Other Financing Uses Transfer out 417,250 417,250 408,440 8,810 424,317 Total Financing Sources 417,250 417,250 408,440 8,810 424,317 Total Expenditures 3,009,752 3,034,752 2,763,157 271,595 2,484,066 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. E3 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Special Revenue Fund Conservation Trust Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget(GAAP Basis)and Actual For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Lottery proceeds 5,900 5,900 6,111 211 4,682 Interest 60 60 57 (3) 50 Total Revenues 5,960 5,960 6,168 208 4,732 Other Financing Uses Transfer(Out) - (15,337) (15,337) - (28,163) Total Financing Sources - (15,337) (15,337) - (28,163) Excess (Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenditures 5,960 (9,377) (9,169) 208 (23,431) Fund Balances -Beginning of Year 26,723 26,723 25,046 (1,677) 48,477 Fund Balances -End of Year 32,683 17,346 15,877 (1,469) 25,046 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. E4 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION C O L O R A D O FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget(GAAP Basis)and Actual For the Year Ended December 31,2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Variance Original Final Positive Budget Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Property taxes 80,000 80,000 80,187 187 80,122 Specific ownership tax 3,000 3,000 3,392 392 2,778 Interest 400 400 1,453 1,053 680 Total Revenues 83,400 83,400 85,032 1,632 83,580 Expenditures: Principal 215,000 215,000 215,000 - 200,000 Interest 86,227 86,227 86,227 - 97,009 Other 4,500 4,500 2,946 1,554 2,945 Total Expenditures 305,727 305,727 304,173 1,554 299,954 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenditures (222,327) (222,327) (219,141) 3,186 (216,374) Other Financing Sources: Transfer in 247,250 247,250 247,250 - 246,153 Transfer out - (175,000) (175,000) - - Total Other Financing Sources 247,250 72,250 72,250 - 246,153 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues and Other Financing Sources Over Expenditures 24,923 (150,077) (146,891) 3,186 29,779 Fund Balances -Beginning of Year (24,923) (24,923) 709,137 734,060 679,358 Fund Balances -End of Year - (175,000) 562,246 737,246 709,137 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F1 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Capital Equipment Replacement Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget (GAAP Basis) and Actual For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Original and Variance Final Positive Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Highway users revenue 42,844 45,108 2,264 45,566 Earnings on investments 300 1,069 769 337 Total Revenues 43,144 46,177 3,033 45,903 Expenditures: Equipment 245,000 36,188 208,812 - Total Expenditures 245,000 36,188 208,812 - Excess (Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenditures (201,856) 9,989 211,845 45,903 Other Financing Sources: Transfer In 115,000 106,190 (8,810) 70,000 Total Other Financing Sources 115,000 106,190 (8,810) 70,000 Excess (Deficiency)of Revenues and Other Financing Sources Over Expenditures (86,856) 116,179 203,035 115,903 Fund Balances -Beginning of Year 408,619 411,752 3,133 295,849 Fund Balances -End of Year 321,763 527,931 206,168 411,752 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F2 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Enterprise Fund Water Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Change in Net Assets Budget(Non-GAAP) Basis and Actual With Reconciliation to GAAP Basis For the Year Ended December 31,2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Original and Variance Final Positive Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Tap fees 8,000 - (8,000) - User fees 605,000 612,705 7,705 606,453 Water meter fees 1,000 2,980 1,980 6,292 Interest income 1,300 10,698 9,398 7,723 Excavation permits 200 550 350 550 Other 5,000 3,168 (1,832) 4,406 Total Revenues 620,500 630,101 9,601 625,424 Expenditures: Personnel: Salaries 183,515 176,400 7,115 207,153 Retirement 6,800 5,946 854 7,619 Health insurance 32,000 28,762 3,238 35,796 Travel and training 9,000 2,552 6,448 2,165 Total 231,315 213,660 17,655 252,733 Commodities: Insurance 20,000 16,116 3,884 15,860 Supplies 58,500 16,570 41,930 23,611 System repair and maintenance 75,000 55,346 19,654 13,132 Testing 5,000 1,318 3,682 2,486 Telephone 5,500 3,039 2,461 2,790 Utilities 45,000 34,329 10,671 35,742 Miscellaneous 14,000 7,810 6,190 1,684 Total 223,000 134,528 88,472 95,305 Contractual: Legal 35,000 74,401 (39,401) 73,543 Engineering 40,000 2,245 37,755 19,865 Other professional services 15,500 1,064 14,436 234 Treasurer's and bank fees - - - 16 Professional memberships 8,000 5,070 2,930 6,725 Total 98,500 82,780 15,720 100,383 Other: Transfer to Other Fund 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 Capital projects and purchases 150,000 114,071 35,929 - Water rights 235,000 7,628 227,372 21,578 Total 395,000 131,699 263,301 31,578 Total Expenditures 947,815 562,667 385,148 479,999 Excess (Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenses(Budget Basis) (327,315) 67,434 394,749 145,425 Reconciliation from Budget Basis to GAAP Basis: Capitalized assets 114,071 - Depreciation (396,668) (395,242) Excess (Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenses(GAAP Basis) (215,163) (249,817) Net Assets -Beginning of Year 12,446,832 12,696,649 Net Assets -End of Year 12,231,669 12,446,832 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F3 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado Enterprise Fund Wastewater Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Change in Net Assets Budget(Non-GAAP) Basis and Actual With Reconciliation to GAAP Basis For the Year Ended December 31,2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Original and Variance Final Positive Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Tap fees 7,500 15,700 8,200 67,500 User fees 604,000 606,258 2,258 605,215 Management fees 28,420 28,422 2 28,422 Interest income 2,000 4,825 2,825 2,220 Other 1,000 3,110 2,110 23,523 Total Revenues 642,920 658,315 15,395 726,880 Expenditures: Personnel: Salaries 194,310 173,590 20,720 175,431 Retirement 7,200 5,768 1,432 6,324 Health insurance 30,000 23,995 6,005 25,928 Travel and training 4,500 580 3,920 387 Total 236,010 203,933 32,077 208,070 Commodities: Insurance 5,500 3,892 1,608 4,014 Supplies 2,500 1,324 1,176 1,292 System repair and maintenance 135,500 32,138 103,362 175,826 Testing 1,000 230 770 700 Telephone 1,500 268 1,232 267 Miscellaneous 3,000 209 2,791 212 Total 149,000 38,061 110,939 182,311 Contractual: Legal 5,000 - 5,000 2,180 Engineering 20,000 4,093 15,907 2,760 Other professional services 201,310 148,887 52,423 132,345 Professional memberships 6,000 5,410 590 4,646 Total 232,310 158,390 73,920 141,931 Other: Transfer to Other Fund 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 Capital Reserve payments - 50,783 (50,783) 122,675 Total 10,000 60,783 (50,783) 132,675 Total Expenditures 627,320 461,167 166,153 664,987 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenses (Budget Basis) 15,600 197,148 181,548 61,893 Reconciliation from Budget Basis to GAAP Basis: Capitalized assets - 142,761 Depreciation (436,344) (435,821) Capitalized capital reserve payments 50,783 122,652 Capital reserve increased by interest income 9,265 6,916 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenses (GAAP Basis) (179,148) (101,599) Net Assets-Beginning of Year 14,199,738 14,301,335 Net Assets-End of Year 14,020,590 14,199,736 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F4 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Town of Fraser, Colorado JFOC Operations Schedule of Revenues& Expenses Budget(Non-GAAP) Basis and Actual With Reconciliation to GAAP Basis For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (With Comparative Actual Amounts for 2011) 2012 2011 Final Budget Original and Variance Final Positive Budget Actual (Negative) Actual Revenues: Reimbursable professional services - 4,722 4,722 3,830 JFOC operating charges 739,600 577,978 (161,622) 520,501 Interest revenue 15,600 27,865 12,265 23,907 Grants and contributions - - - 68 Total Revenues 755,200 610,565 (144,635) 548,306 Expenses: Training programs 4,000 653 3,347 1,299 Travel, meals and lodging 3,000 576 2,424 442 Meals and entertainment 200 15 185 - Professional fees 12,000 10,069 1,931 21,853 Engineering fees 15,000 4,043 10,957 2,667 Financial services 100 - 100 - Sludge removal 65,000 22,267 42,733 40,672 Other professional services 36,500 2,784 33,716 4,317 Insurance 28,000 24,588 3,412 30,535 Advertising - 90 (90) 662 Plant maintenance&repair 40,000 26,956 13,044 12,501 Grounds maintenance 2,000 1,078 922 - Equipment rental 500 - 500 - Professional memberships 500 72 428 72 Operating supplies 95,000 79,280 15,720 72,762 Equipment purchase and repair 20,000 9,188 10,812 4,638 Testing 40,000 41,004 (1,004) 35,438 Permits 18,000 8,811 9,189 3,494 Utilities 110,500 134,032 (23,532) 104,468 Vehicles 6,000 5,504 496 4,418 Miscellaneous 1,000 891 109 680 Capital projects 193,500 39,403 154,097 50,956 Payroll expenses 249,917 210,799 39,118 183,413 Total Expenses 940,717 622,103 318,614 575,287 Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenses(Budget Basis) (185,517) (11,538) 173,979 (26,981) Reconciliation from Budget Basis to GAAP Basis: Capital reserve reduced by capital expenses 39,403 50,888 Capital reserve increased by interest income (25,343) (23,907) Operating reserve increased by interest income (2,522) - Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues Over Expenses(GAAP Basis) - - The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F5 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT Financial Planning 02/01 The public report burden for this information collection is estimated to average 380 hours annually. Form#350-050-36 City or County: Town of Fraser LOCAL HIGHWAY FINANCE REPORT YEAR ENDING : December 2012 This Information From The Records Of(example-City of_or County of Prepared By: Nat Havens nhavens(a_)town.fraser.co.us Town of Fraser,Colorado Phone: 970-726-5491 x206 L DISPOSITION OF HIGHWAY-USER REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE A. Local B. Local C. Receipts from D. Receipts from ITEM Motor-Fuel Motor-Vehicle State Highway- Federal Highway Taxes Taxes User Taxes Administration 1. Total receipts available 2. Minus amount used for collection ex cries 3. Minus amount used for nonhi hwa oses 4. Minus amount used for mass transit D. Remainder used tor fughway purposes IL RECEIPTS FOR ROAD AND STREET PURPOSES III. DISBURSEMENTS FOR ROAD AND STREET PURPOSES ITEM AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT A. Receipts from local sources: A. Local highway disbursements: 1. Local highway-user taxes 1. Capital outlay from page 2 343,112 a. Motor Fuel from Item LA.5. 2. Maintenance: 188,153 b. Motor Vehicle from Item I.B.S. 3. Road and street services: c. Total(a.+b.) a. Traffic control operations 12,482 2. General fund appropriations 1,342,840 b. Snow and ice removal 295,669 3. Other local imposts from pag e 2 140,870 c. Other 0 4. Miscellaneous local receipts fr om a e 2 7,377 d. Total a.through c. 308,151 5. Transfers from toll facilities 0 4. General administration&miscellaneous 53,758 6. Proceeds of sale of bonds and notes: 5. Highway law enforcement and safety 372,060 a. Bonds-Original Issues 0 6. Total 1 through 5 1,265,234 b. Bonds-Refunding Issues 0 B. Debt service on local obligations: c. Notes 0 1. Bonds: d. Total a. +b.+c. 0 a. Interest 76,750 7. Total 1 through 6 1,491,087 b. Redemption 195,000 B. Private Contributions 0 c. Total(a.+b. 271,750 C. Receipts from State government 2. Notes: from page 2 45,897 a. Interest 0 D. Receipts from Federal Government b. Redemption 0 from page 2 0 c. Total(a.+b. 0 E. Total receipts(A.7+B+C+D) 1,536,984 3. Tota (l.c+2.c) 271,750 ments to State for highways 0 D. Payments to toll facilities 0 E. Total disbursements +B.3+C+ IV. LOCAL HIGHWAY DEBT STATUS (Show all entries at par) Opening Debt Amount Issued Redemptions Closing Debt A. Bonds Total 2,140,000 195,000 1,945,000 1. Bonds(Refunding Portion B. Notes(Total) 0 V. LOCAL ROAD AND STREET FUND BALANCE A.Be innin Balance B. Total Receipts C.Total Disbursement D.Ending Balance E.Reconciliation 1,536,984 1,536,984 0 Notes and Comments: FORM FHWA-536(Rev. 1-05) PREVIOUS EDITIONS OBSOLETE (Next Page) F6 FINAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT STATE: Colorado LOCAL HIGHWAY FINANCE REPORT YEAR ENDING(mm/yy): December 2012 IL RECEIPTS FOR ROAD AND STREET PURPOSES-DETAIL ITEM AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT A.3. Other local imposts: A.4. Miscellaneous local receipts: a. Property Taxes and Assessments 80,187 a. Interest on investments 1,453 b. Other local imposts: b. Traffic Fines&Penalities 0 1. Sales Taxes 49,062 c.Parking Garage Fees 0 2. Infrastructure&Impact Fees 0 d. Parking Meter Fees 0 3. Liens 0 e. Sale of Surplus Pro pert 0 4.Licenses 0 f. Charges for Services 0 5. Specific Ownership&/or Other 11,621 1 g. Other Misc.Receipts 5,924 6. Total L through 5. 60,683 h. Other 0 c. Total a. +b. 140,870 i. Total a.through h. 7,377 (Carry forward to page 1) (Ca forward to page 1) ITEM AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT C. Receipts from State Government D. Receipts from Federal Government 1. Highway-user taxes 41,762 L FHWA from Item LD.5. 2. State general funds 2. Other Federal agencies: 3. Other State funds: a. Forest Service a. State bond proceeds b. FEMA b. Project Match c. HUD c. Motor Vehicle Registrations 4,135 d. Federal Transit Admin d. Other (Specify) e. U.S. Corps of Engineers e. Other Specify) f. Other Federal f. Total a.through e. 4,135 g. Total a.through f. 0 4. Total L +2.+3. 45,897 3. Total(L +2. (Carry forward to a e 1) III. DISBURSEMENTS FOR ROAD AND STREET PURPOSES-DETAIL ON NATIONAL OFF NATIONAL HIGHWAY HIGHWAY TOTAL SYSTEM SYSTEM a b c A.I. Capital outlay: a. Right-Of-Way Costs 0 950 950 b. Engineering Costs 0 8,217 8,217 c. Construction: (1).New Facilities 0 0 0 (2). Capacity Improvements 0 0 0 (3). System Preservation 0 314,915 314,915 (4). System Enhancement&Operation 0 19,030 19,030 (5). Total Construction 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 0 333,945 333,945 d. Total Capital Outlay Lines La. +Lb.+ 1.a.5 0 343,112 343,112 (Carry forward to page 1) Notes and Comments: FORM FHWA-536(Rev.1-05) PREVIOUS EDITIONS OBSOLETE F7 Lu Berger To: Jeff Durbin Subject: RE: REVISED REQUEST to Close Norgren Rd for Block Party From: Mary Zielke Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:20 AM To: 'JDURBIN @TOWN.FRASER.CO.US' Subject: REQUEST TO CLOSE STREET FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PARTY Jeff Durbin, I've lived in the Fraser Valley for most of the past ten years. I've lived on my block on Norgren Rd for over three years and know only a handful of neighbors by their first names. Most of us work and have little time to mingle. I talked to my next door neighbor, Mike Utley, while we were both shoveling this winter. We agreed it would be nice to hold a block party so neighbors could meet neighbors. We thought it would also be nice to let new residents feel part of our community. Here is what we'd like to do: GET TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS NORGREN ROAD SPRING BLOCK PARTY Wednesday, May 29, 2013 6-9 pm Pull out the grill, play tunes, bring out the kids, mingle with neighbors. Let's celebrate the end of winter! (This last could jinx the date) We respectfully request that traffic be closed off for two blocks on Norgren Road from Eisenhower to Mill Avenue from 5:30 to 9:30. We would have to borrow orange cones and/or saw horses from Public Works to close the street at Eisenhower, Byers and Mill Avenue. We've spoken with Police Chief Trainor who suggested he could have several officers there to meet and greet, let the neighborhood kids climb into a squad car, possibly a fire truck. We would also like to invite Mayor Peggy Smith, Town Manager Jeff Durbin, as well as the Board of Trustees: Steve Sumrall, Eileen Waldow, Philip Naill, Cheri Sanders, Vesta Shapiro and Adam Cwiklin; as well as people from departments of the Town of Fraser. I took flyers around the neighborhood to announce our intention and met much enthusiasm. I left flyers with my phone number for people who were not at home. No one has voiced opposition. With your permission to proceed, we will do a follow up flyer/discussion with the locals: • Limited access/egress during the hours to 5:30 to 9:30 pm on 05/29/2013. • Pull out your grill. • Get the kids out to meet neighbors. • Play music. Or better yet, get your musical group out into the street. • Please be aware that the Town of Fraser allows no alcohol on the streets. • Smoking marijuana is still legal only in your home. I will set up a table in front of 223 Norgren Rd with name tags. 1 As soon as we have Town Board approval I will visit local businesses to see if we can get donations of soda, chips, etc. Chief Trainor suggested they might provide the hotdogs. We respectfully request that the board grant us approval to proceed with our "spring" mixer. Please feel free to offer suggestions. Mike Utley, owner, 203A Norgren Rd. Mary Zielke, Renter, 223#1 Norgren Rd. 970-531-0717. MARY.ZIELKE.1961 @GMAIL.COM 2 \ PO/NT OF \ BEG INNING \ ti�O• �0 �F 8 1�r� \ .�0.�� °�lP BPS\55`�9.15`�� LOT 42 EAST MOUNTAIN FILING NO. 1 ESMT. AREA 26.92 N2 2,087 sq. ft. .' 0.05 ACRES TRACT 4E-10 \ o� EAST MOUNTAIN F1L1NG 1 t� •1b` o � ' LOT J7 \ EAST MOUNTAIN \ FILING NO. 1 \ \ Ppp REGis ��• 3-30-13 '"'Imnlnnm�a��� * Denotes only a change SCALE 1"=20' of direction or legal description call, not a set monument. NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years Page 2 of 2 from the date of the certification shown. �_ � V LO p w "cn z= 1 �yll LLJ Y w 0 U °� LaQi i Q m C.� `��! 6 0 Z J O Z -� ��1� N-O �0H O Of=� S aria �J Q ono w<� wZU 6 Qa ZV)w w 0Cn o N O Z O Z Z O ��J w - dNN~NN N m m p N ••• ~O� Z Q Z m V•p•••• •••U• a 0 ~Q>UUi •ov°••• w U Lj •• O Z U)p 2 LLJ O w OJ ~w�Z 0 m w— 000 H>0 O�V) v ~LLI O O -° Z i v i U) , P� a rn , , M 9 U � O LO Ob Q o y o -1rn yy N II yyy w O 0� yy > y aw U w 9 P/ yyy �� yyyy 9165 y g16b yyyyy 9y 9 � O J �byyy 9 M Z6,-!%, Roland Rick 745 Heartstrong St. Superior, CO 80027 303-815-9280 rolandr @gti.gualcomm.com May 8, 2013 Allen Nordin, Public Works Director Jeff Durbin,Town Manager Town of Fraser Board of Trustees To whom it may concern In response to my discussions with Allen, I am providing my input regarding how to value the proposed easement. I will outline several different ways to view this and conclude with my proposal. All of the information contained in this letter is taken from the assessor's website and so is only as accurate as that information. The first question is what a reasonable purchase price is for land. The area of land covered by the proposed easement is 2087 sq ft. There have been 7 lots sold in Rendezvous over the past 2 years (Lots 13,18,21,25,37,42, and 54). Here are several different ways to make this calculation. I am more than happy to provide the spreadsheet I used for these calculations upon request. • At one extreme is the cost per acre that I paid for Lot 37. This gives a value of$16.3k for the land covered in the proposed easement. • 1 contend that the price I paid for Lot 37 and that the owner of Lot 42 paid included a land value component and a premium for an unobstructed view of the ski area and having the Town open space adjacent to our lots which expands the visual area of land not occupied by another house. The proposed easement does not enhance the view or area of land not occupied by another house and so this premium should not be included in the calculation of land value. Calculating the value of land based on the average of the other 5 properties sold in the last 2 years gives a value of$7.6k for the land covered in the proposed easement. • For reference, the value of land covered in the proposed easement based on the lowest sale price is$5.0k. The value of land covered in the proposed easement based on the average of all 7 properties is$10.6k. The proposed value of$7.6k is right in the middle of that range. The second question is how much lower the value of an easement is relative to an outright purchase of the land. Under the current terms of the proposed agreement,the Town of Fraser is retaining ownership of the affected land, is only granting me a nonexclusive easement, is using a portion of the affected land for its access, is requiring that I restore the original grade and vegetation of the existing access road, and is requiring that I be responsible for maintenance and repair of the shared portion of their new access road. The intangible cost of outright ownership with exclusive use can be reasonably argued is over$4000. If this is factored in relative to an $8k land value,you arrive at a value of$4k for the easement. Also please note that I have spent$1k and anticipate spending another$1k in expenses for the engineering evaluation and drafting of the necessary documents and the cost of restoring the original grade and vegetation and the ongoing cost of maintenance in perpetuity can be reasonably argued is over$4k. With all that said, I propose that a reasonable compromise between myself and the Town of Fraser after considering all of the above points is that I pay the Town of Fraser$10,000 for the easement under the current terms of the proposed agreement. Once again,thank you for your time and consideration. Roland Rick 0 C Q� / / O o / 00 �\ \ d J, a� - 6' III IY_ 0) z0 Ln o =�LL- ! `� Q U) 0 y WzC) L6 00 000 0 zz ° J W �Q 2 vo Q W> C) o� U' v• +' �c�- ~ m�. z ._- LL- ' 000 / / ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is made this day of , 2013,between the TOWN OF FRASER, a municipal corporation, P.O. Box 120, Fraser, CO 80442 (the "Town") and THE ROLAND R. RICK TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2006, whose address is 745 E. Heartstrong Street, Superior, CO 80027-8003 ("Owner"). WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of real estate situated in the Town of Fraser, Grand County, Colorado described as follows: Lot 37, East Mountain - Filing 1 (hereinafter"Owner's Property"); and WHEREAS, Owner's Property has direct access to a public street, but constructing a driveway from such public street to the proposed homesite would be difficult, and Owner has proposed an alternate access over the following described property owned by the Town: Tract 4E-10 East Mountain, Filing 1 (hereinafter"Town Property"); and WHEREAS, Owner has requested, and the Town has agreed to grant an access easement for the installation, maintenance and repair of a driveway over the Town Property for access to Owner's Property, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties that the terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon Owner and all future owners of Owner's Property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises above set forth and for good and valuable consideration the receipt of$ and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: (1) The Town hereby grants to Owner a non-exclusive easement on and over the Town Property,being twenty feet(20') in width along and adjacent to the northwesterly boundary of the Town Property, as specified in Exhibit A attached hereto, for the installation, maintenance and repair of a driveway for access to the Owner's Property (herein referred to as the "Easement"). The surface of said driveway shall be no more than twelve feet(12') in width and shall be located not less than five feet(5') from the northwesterly boundary of the Town Property. (2) The driveway shall be paved with asphalt or concrete material with a minimum thickness of five inches (5"), in order to bear the weight of Town maintenance vehicles,which will also use the driveway for access to facilities on the Town Property. (3) All construction, maintenance and repair work by Owner within the Easement shall be done in a timely and good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. During construction of the driveway or construction on Owner's Property, the road bed on the Easement must be graveled and maintained to prevent trucks and equipment from sinking or sliding close to the water storage tank on the Town Property. Prior to or concurrent with construction, Owner shall install a temporary construction perimeter fencing along the entire access easement from the public ROW of Cozens Ridge roadway to the property boundary of lot 37. (4) Snow plowing and removal on the Easement shall be conducted in a manner so that snow is not deposited on the Town Property outside of the Easement boundaries, but is removed and stored on Owner's Property. (5) The Easement is nonexclusive. The Town may use the area encompassed by the Easement in any manner whatsoever, so long as such use is consistent with the Easement herein granted. Owner acknowledges that the operation and maintenance of the facilities located on the Town Property may cause damage to the driveway surface or require temporary removal of portions of the driveway. The Town shall not be liable for any such damage or removal, and Owner shall be solely responsible for any necessary repairs to the driveway. (6) In further consideration for the grant of the Easement, Owner agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, its officers, employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool (the "Indemnified Parties"), from and against all liabilities, losses, claims, demands, damages and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, incurred or suffered by the Indemnified Parties as a result o£ (a) failure by Owner to perform any covenant or obligation required to be performed by Owner hereunder; (b) any accident, injury, or damage caused by,resulting from, arising out of or in any manner connected with the existence of the driveway or the use of the Easement hereby granted; and(c) failure by Owner to comply with any requirement of any governmental authority. (7) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, all other parties who may hereafter acquire an interest in the properties subject hereto, and except as otherwise provided herein, shall run with the land. (8) The Town of Fraser will request from Rendezvous, LLC. an amendment to the deed restrictions for Tract 4E-10 to allow for this change in use. If the Town is not successful in securing an executed amendment, this agreement shall become null and of no effect. - 2 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto subscribed their signatures, effective the date first above mentioned. TOWN OWNER TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THE ROLAND R. RICK TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2006 BY: Peggy Smith,Mayor BY: ATTEST: Trustee Lu Berger, Town Clerk ( SEAL) STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2013, by Peggy Smith, as Mayor, and Lu Berger, as Town Clerk, of the Town of Fraser, Colorado, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: ( SEAL) Notary Public STATE OF ) ) SS COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2013,by , as Trustee of THE ROLAND R. RICK TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2006. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: - 3 - ( SEAL ) Notary Public - 4 - L O R A D Sa p pe¢"1¢N1ae &i¢FiNCo To: Mayor Smith and Board of Trustees From: Allen Nordin, Director of Public Works Date: May 15, 2013 Subject: Access Easement Agreement: Roland Rick, Lot 37 East Mountain Filing 1-RV Roland Rick is the owner of lot 37, East Mountain Filing 1 in Rendezvous. He is requesting an access easement from Fraser on a portion of Town-owned property on the adjacent lot to his. See attached site map. The Town-owned property is legally described as Tract 4E-10 East Mountain Filing 1 and currently has public water system infrastructure on the lot (specifically the Red Zone Pump Station, the Green Zone water storage tank and associated piping). He is requesting the access easement in order to avoid a steep driveway which he would have if he were to access his lot from the lower portion of Cozens Ridge. The easement would allow him to access the upper portion of his lot via a driveway adjacent to the eastern lot line of the Town-owned property. As a reminder, if this easement is approved and executed, this portion of Tract 4E-10 will be a part of the lot 37 property in perpetuity and run with the land. Attached is a draft Access Easement Agreement to construct the driveway across Tract 4E-10. Rendezvous previously granted and executed a Special Warranty Deed conveying this tract to Fraser with a deed restricted use stating the following: "Use of Property. The property is to be used solely for open space purposes and enjoyment of the general public which may also be used for the construction, maintenance, repair, replacement and operation of a water storage tank and/or booster station and related facilities" In order for this access easement to be permitted, Fraser will need to obtain an amendment to the deed restriction from Rendezvous, LLC. Rendezvous has indicated that they are agreeable to amending the Special Warranty Deed. See attached. Mr. Rick and I have been working on a collaborative approach to provide the Board with compensation for the use of the land. It was agreed that the value of this property is $10,000.00 as outlined in the agreement. In addition, all fees incurred to date by the Town such as engineering, legal, surveying, etc. shall be paid in full by Mr. Rick prior to the agreement being executed. Since this is the first reading of this request and based on the Board's consideration, if approved, it is our intention to bring the access easement agreement back on consent agenda at the next Town Board meeting. Staff recommends approval of the Roland Rick (Lot 37) Access Easement Agreement as outlined above and as described in the Access Easement Agreement (Exhibit A) along with an executed Deed Restriction Amendment (Exhibit B) from Rendezvous, LLC, attached hereto. Please contact me with any questions. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2013-05-01 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR 303 COZENS RIDGE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1. The Town Board of Fraser, Colorado hereby authorizes the Town Manager to execute an easement agreement as attached. 2. This is conditioned upon payment of all applicable fees and must be executed within fiscal year 2013 or this approval shall no longer be effective. READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THIS 15th DAY OF MAY, 2013. Votes in favor: _ BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: _ TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Absent: _ Abstained: _ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk AMENDMENT TO DEED RESTRICTION THIS AMENDMENT TO DEED RESTRICTION is entered into effective 2013,by and between THE TOWN OF FRASER,COLORADO,a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado("Fraser"),and RENDEZVOUS COLORADO,LLC,f/k/a Maryvale Village,LLC,a Colorado limited liability company ("Rendezvous"). WHEREAS,Rendezvous,as Grantor, previously executed a Special Warranty Deed,dated February 26, 2001 and recorded March 19,2001 at Reception No.2001-002460 of the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Grand County,Colorado(the "Filing 1 Deed"),which conveyed to Fraser,as Grantee,certain tracts of land located in within East Mountain-Filing 1;and WHEREAS,said Filing 1 Deed includes the following restriction regarding the use of the tracts conveyed to Fraser: Use of Property. The Property shall be used solely for open space purposes for the use and enjoyment of the general public,except for Tracts 4E-10 and 4E-11,which may also be used for the construction, maintenance,repair,replacement and operation of a water storage tank and/or booster station and related facilities. (the "Use Restriction");and WHEREAS,Fraser and Rendezvous desire to amend said Use Restriction to exempt Tract 4E-10 from such restriction and allow unrestricted use thereof by Fraser. NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of ten dollars($10.00)paid by Fraser to Rendezvous and other good and valuable consideration,the parties agree that said Use Restriction in the Filing 1 Deed is hereby amended by exempting therefrom the following property owned by Fraser: Tract 4E-10,East Mountain-Filing 1,Town of Fraser,County of Grand,State of Colorado. All other terms,reservations,covenants and restrictions contained in said Filing 1 Deed shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. RENDEZVOUS COLORADO,LLC, f/k/a Maryvale Village,LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. By: KOELBEL AND COMPANY,a Colorado corporation,Manager. By: Title: STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013,by ,as of Koelbel and Company,a Colorado corporation, Manager of Rendezvous Colorado LLC,a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: (SEAL) Notary Public THE TOWN OF FRASER,COLORADO,a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado BY: Peggy Smith,Mayor ATTEST: Lu Berger,Town Clerk STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on 120 by Peggy Smith,as Mayor,and Lu Berger,as Town Clerk,of The Town of Fraser,Colorado,a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: (SEAL) Notary Public -2- eip co GRANS DCOIINTV ® Association p Yom_- x P.O. Box 105 • Rot Sulphur Springs, Colorado 80451 • 970-725-3939 • Paz: 970.725-0129 ti A550G May 8, 2013 Town of Fraser 143 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442-0370 Dear Stakeholders for the Town of Fraser, We are representatives of Cozens Ranch Museum (CRM), a branch of the Grand County Historical Association (GCHA). GCHA is a 501(c)(3), in existence in Grand County for 39 years. CRM in Fraser was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1987, and opened to the public in 1991. With this letter and presentation on May 15, 2013, CRM requests funding from the Town of Fraser. At this time, we request assistance to a matching grant from the State Historic Preservation Fund of History Colorado. We have proposed an Outdoor Signage Project at Cozens Ranch Museum to collaborate with the Fraser River Trail signage, and to serve as a Gateway to Heritage in Grand County. Catherine Trotter of the Town of Fraser Planning Department has effectively and professionally served as one of the project's advisors. From several local bids, the project cost is estimated at$34,804. Our grant to the State Historic Fund is for $26,103; and we now seek matching funds as 25% of the total cost, or$8,701. We respectfully request Town of Fraser funds in the amount of$1,000 towards the matching funds for CRM's Outdoor Signage Project. The purpose of the Outdoor Signage Project at Cozens Ranch is to educate local citizens and school groups, the general public and visitors to Grand County about Historic Preservation, National Historic Register properties in Fraser and Grand County, Community Heritage, and area Archaeology. In interpretive text and maps, the signage will educate, on a 24/7 basis and with access for all, those who frequent Mary's Pond, the Fraser River Trail, and CRM: Fraser Valley's only museum. Signage will be bilingual in Spanish and English. In Ms. Trotter's Letter of Support to the State Historic Fund, it states that the Outdoor Signage project is "a wonderful collaborative project that would help promote heritage tourism...allow more visitors to access underutilized community assets of Grand County's museums and National Historic Register properties..." The Grand County Board of County Commissioners' Letter of Support concluded that, "The proposed signage serves the goals of heritage tourism...Public educational signage is an economic driver." Along with GCHA's experienced staff and board, the Project team includes Ms. Trotter, and Scott Munn, president of the Grand County Historic Preservation Board. Thank you for the opportunity to address the Town of Fraser next week about Cozens Ranch Museum and GCHA's work that benefits the Town of Fraser. Should you have specific questions prior to that time, please let us know through Ms. Catherine Trotter. Most Sincerely, 4 S }� -/�� Kristi Martens, PhD Museum Manger Grand County Historical Association Pounded in 1074 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective 12013, by and between the TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado (herein referred to as "Fraser"), and the EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT No. 4 (herein referred to as "Fire District"), a special district of the State of Colorado (herein referred to as "Fire District"). ARTICLE 1.0 - RECITALS AND PURPOSE 1.1 Fraser and Fire District are political subdivisions of the State of Colorado. 1_2 The constitution and Statutes of the State of Colorado, particularly Part 2, Article 1, Title 29, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended, authorize political subdivisions to enter into agreements which may be of mutual benefit to both parties. 1.3 Fraser and Fire District desire to confirm their understanding and agreement on various cooperative matters, as set forth in this Agreement. 1.4 This Agreement has been authorized and approved by the legislative body of each of the parties hereto. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 2.0 — 2.1 The Fire District has determined, for the benefit of training purposes, the need for a Town owned water main line to be extended from its terminus at the property line of the Centennial Bank and the Fire District properties north along the Districts west property line parallel to US Highway 40. 2.2 The Fire District has requested that Fraser provide the project management for said project with respect to using Fraser and their consultants for the design, bidding and construction management services. 2.3 The Fire District shall provide Fraser with all design criteria and specifications for the project and will review and sign off for approval on the final construction plans prior to going to bid. Any change order related to the project shall require the Fire Districts written approval. 2.4 The Fire District shall reimburse the Town for the total cost of the project including a 5% administrative fee based on the overall cost of the project. 2.5 These water system improvements once completed, shall be dedicated to Fraser following final acceptance of the project. ARTICLE 5.0 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5_1 All notices that may be required or given pursuant to this Agreement by a party to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given when made in writing and deposited in the United States first class mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Fire District Town of Fraser Fire Chief Town Manager East Grand Fire Protection District Town of Fraser, Colorado PO Box 2967 P.O. Box 370 Winter Park, CO 80482 Fraser, CO 80442 5_2 Both Fraser and Fire District are entitled to the protections and immunities provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101 et seq., as from time to time amended. Nothing contained herein is intended, nor shall any provision hereof be construed as a waiver of such protections and immunities. 5_3 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall restrict or prohibit Fraser from amending, adding to, or repealing its ordinances and regulations, including without limitation, those applicable to water rates. 5.4 This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and may not be altered or amended except by a writing signed by both parties and specifically referring hereto. 5.5 This Agreement shall be construed under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado, and the District Court in and for Grand County, Colorado, shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any court action arising there from. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto subscribed their signatures, effective the date first above mentioned. EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO DISTRICT BY: BY: Mayor President ATTEST: ATTEST: Town Clerk Secretary ( SEAL ) ( SEAL ) -3- C O L O R A U p peo"Joi dae &i¢Fifto To: Mayor Smith and Board of Trustees From: Allen Nordin, Director of Public Works Date: May 15, 2013 Subject: IGA with the East Grand Fire Protection District No.4 for a Water Line Extension Project. Staff met with the East Grand Fire Protection District (Fire District) to discuss options for the Town to provide construction management services for their project. The project involves the extension of a public waterline from the south side of their property to bring it to the north of their westerly property line to allow for the connection to a fire hydrant that was installed by the district last year for training purposes. The Fire District will provide the consultants with the design criteria and specifications for the project and the District will also be required to review and approve in writing all work prior to finalizing the plan documents that will go out to public bid. In addition, the District will also approve in writing any change order that may be necessary during the course of the project. The agreement would allow for Fraser to use our consultants for the design, bidding, installation and management of the project. In return, the Fire District has agreed to pay Fraser a 5% administrative fee on top of the total cost of the project in return for Fraser's services. Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2013-05-02 authorizing the Town Manager to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with the East Grand Fire Protection District for the purpose of providing construction management services. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com TOWN OF FRASER ORDINANCE NO. 404 Series 2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLES 2 AND 4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, WITH RESPECT TO WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND CHARGES APPLICABLE IN THE TOWN OF FRASER AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 10, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE WATER AND WASTEWATER COMMITTEE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: PART 1 : AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 13 (Municipal Utilities) of the Code of the Town of Fraser, Colorado (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") is hereby amended as follows [Note: additions are shown in bold underlined print; deletions are shown as stFikethFowgh print; the notation "No Change" indicates that the referenced provisions are not modified]: 1 .1 Article 2 (Water System), Section 13-2-50 (Service Connections) and Section 13-2-330 (Additional Fees and Charges) are hereby amended as follows: Sec. 13-2-50. Service connections. (a) - (d) [No Change] (e) Owner to maintain service line. The owner of any property connecting to the water utility shall be responsible for the maintenance of the water service line from the corporation stop on the main to the structure being served and shall keep such line in good condition at his or her expense. The property owner shall, at his or her expense, at all times keep all pipes, fixtures and appliances on said property leak-free and in good working order so as to prevent waste of water. Leaks or breaks in any portion of the water service line shall be repaired by the property owner within a reasonable period of time after notification of such condition by the Town, or within the time specified in the notification from the Town, if applicable. The Town reserves the right to shut off the water service, effect a repair and collect the cost thereof from the customer, if notification of the customer cannot be accomplished in a timely manner, if the customer does not act promptly to effect the repair, or if, in the sole opinion of the Town Manager, other circumstances make such action necessary and in the best interests of the Town. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Town may charge the customer - 1 - for repairs if the source of a leak is not obvious, and upon investigation by the Town, the source of the leak is determined to be the customer's service line. In all such cases where a leak occurs in a service line, the customer shall be responsible for costs of repairing the service line and any collateral damage caused by the leak and repairs, including any damage to adjoining public rights of way or infrastructure. The Town's lien, as provided in Section 13-2-280, shall extend to and secure all such costs and other sums owed to the Town. No adjustment shall be made on water service fees by reason of a leak in a service line. Any water leak is considered an emergency and shall be handled as such. (f) - (i) [No Change] Sec. 13-2-330. Additional fees and charges. (a) - (b) [No Change] (c) The owner of any premises served shall also be liable for and shall reimburse the Town for all costs incurred in connection with the collection of any fees, charges, penalties or other sums payable for the provision of water equipment or service to the premises, or in connection with the enforcement of this Article, including reasonable attorney fees, whether or not suit is brought. The Town's lien shall extend to and secure all such costs and other sums owed to the Town. 1_2 Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System), Section 13-4-30 (General provisions and matters) and Section 13-4-50 (Plant investment fees) are hereby amended; as follows: Sec. 13-4-30. General provisions and matters. (a) - (b) [No Change] (c) Service line maintenance. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to keep the sanitary sewer service line between the building and the public sanitary sewer main clean and clear of any obstructions and to keep said service line in good repair at all times, so that exfiltration and infiltration are kept to a minimum and so that there shall be no accumulation of septic sewage therein. Leaks or breaks in any portion of the sewer service line shall be repaired by the property owner within a reasonable period of time after notification of such condition by the Town, or within the time specified in the notification from the Town, if applicable. The Town reserves the right to disconnect the sewer service, effect a repair and collect the cost thereof from the customer, if notification of the customer cannot be accomplished in a timely manner, if the customer does not act promptly to effect the - 2 - repair, or if, in the sole opinion of the Town Manager, other circumstances make such action necessary and in the best interests of the Town. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Town may charge the customer for repairs if the source of a leak is not obvious, and upon investigation by the Town, the source of the leak is determined to be the customer's service line. In all such cases where a leak occurs in a service line, the customer shall be responsible for costs of repairing the service line and any collateral damage caused by the leak and repairs, including any damage to adjoining public rights of way or infrastructure. The Town's lien, as provided in Section 13-4-90, shall extend to and secure all such costs and other sums owed to the Town. No adjustment shall be made on sewer service fees by reason of a leak in a service line. Any sewer leak is considered an emergency and shall be handled as such. (d) - (e) [No Change] Sec. 13-4-50. Plant investment fees. (a) An applicant for sanitary sewer service iffl the T.o.o.,:, shall pay a sanitary sewer plant investment fee for each sanitary sewer-using &F�& unit requesting such service. Sanitary Sewer plant investment fees will be established by the Board of Trustees by resolution and are subject to change from time to time. Such fee shall be paid in full prior to the time a building permit is issued and prior to the time that each sanitary sewer-using unit is connected to the Town sanitary sewer system. Said fee shall be in addition to all other fees or changes related to water service elsewhere described in this Chapter, and such plant investment fee shall not be rebated under any circumstances. (b) The sanitary sewer plant investment fee for each SFE unit is contained in Appendix A to this Code. (c) Upon payment of the plant investment fee, the sanitary sewer-using unit may access the Town sanitary sewer system for construction in accordance with the provisions of this Article. Sanitary sewer service fees are applicable to the sanitary sewer-using unit ninety (90) days after Payment of the plant investment fee. (d) The sanitary sewer plant investment fee for any new development or - 3 - change of use shall be determined by multiplying the sanitary sewer plant investment fee per SFE rate by the applicable SFE multiplier set forth in the SFE Schedule for Plant Investment Fees in Section 13-2-210(d)(1-6). This SFE schedule is based upon typical expectations for the specified water meter size and/or use. Unusual circumstances, or uses not specified within the schedule, may require further evaluation to determine the applicable SFE rate. (e) A sanitary sewer-using unit that replaces an existing water meter with a larger water meter shall be responsible for additional plant investment fees in accordance with the increase in SFEs. 1.3 Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System), Section 13-4-60 (Sewer rates) is renumbered as Section 13-4-70 (Sewer rates), and Section 13-4-70 (Transfer or sales of plant investment fees) is renumbered as 13-4-60 (Transfer or sale of plant investment fees), and those sections are amended as follows: Sec. 13-4-60. Transfer or sales of plant investment fees. Sec. 13-4-60(5). Sec. 13-4-70. Services rates. Fees are hereby levied and assessed for sanitary sewer service at the rates as established from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees. Such rates are hereby found, determined and declared by the Board of Trustees to be equitable and must. 1.4 Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System), Section 13-4-80 (Connection to sewer) is renumbered as Section 13-4-120 (Connection to sewer) with no changes. 1.5 Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System), Section 13-4-90 (Miscellaneous provisions) is renumbered as Section 13-4-140 (Miscellaneous provisions) and amended as follows: - 4 - Sec. 13-4-140. Miscellaneous provisions. (a) (1) — (5) [No Changes] 6) (7) [renumbered (6) with no changes] (b) [Delete in entirety] (1) , (2) ndor (c) [Delete in entirety] (d) [renumber (b)] Additional charges; lien. 04) Por month in ' The owner of any premises served shall also be liable for and shall reimburse the Town for all costs incurred in connection with the collection of any fees, charges, penalties or other sums payable for the provision of sanitary sewer equipment or service to the premises, or in connection with the enforcement of this Article, including reasonable attorney fees, whether or not suit is brought. The Town's lien shall extend to and secure all such costs and other sums owed to the Town. (e) - (f) [renumbered (c) - (d) with no changes] 1.6 Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System) is hereby amended by the addition of the following new sections: Section 13-4-80 (Basis for sanitary sewer service fee), Section 13-4-90 (Late payment charges), Section 13-4-100 (Unpaid sanitary sewer bills a lien), Section 13-4-110 (Delinquent charges places on tax tolls) and Section 13-4-150 (Deferral of plant investment fees), as follows: - 5 - Sec. 13-4-80. Basis for sanitary sewer service fee. All rates for sanitary sewer service shall be based on the SFE schedule as defined in Subsection 13-2-210(d)(1-6). Fees for sanitary sewer service will be established and subject to change form time to time upon approval of the Board of Trustees by resolution. Sec. 13-4-90. Late Payment charges. Sanitary sewer accounts are billed on the last day of the quarter and shall be considered delinquent on the twenty-sixth day of the following month. Delinquent accounts will be assessed a penalty as adopted by the Board of Trustees and a finance charge of one percent (1%) per month on the unpaid balance due. Sec. 13-4-100. Unpaid sanitary sewer bills a lien. (a) All unpaid sanitary sewer fees and charges shall be a lien upon the sanitary sewer-using property and/or the sanitary sewer-using unit to or for which sanitary sewer was provided from the time when said taxes and charges become due and shall be a perpetual charge and lien against said sanitary sewer-using property and/or sanitary sewer-using unit until paid. Said taxes and charges shall be collected and such lien enforced as provided by law. (b) In addition to the foregoing, the Town may terminate service to the property and/or the sanitary sewer-using units to or for which sanitary sewer was provided until such time as all unpaid sanitary sewer fees and charges are paid. Terminated sanitary sewer service will not be reconnected until all fees and charges are paid or arrangements are made for payment as approved by the Town. Sec. 13-4-110 Delinquent charges placed on tax rolls. In addition to or as an alternative to the foregoing sections for collection of unpaid sanitary sewer charges, and to the other remedies provided in this Article, in the event that any charges as provided in this Article are not paid when due, which charges shall include service fees, plant investment fess, penalties, interest and attorneys' fees, among any other charges, the Town Clerk may certify such delinquent charges to the County Treasurer to be placed by the County Treasurer upon the tax rolls for the current year, to be collected in the same manner as other taxes are collected, with ten percent (10%) of the amount of such delinquency added thereto to defray the costs of collection; and all laws of the State for the assessment and collection of general taxes and the - 6 - enforcement of liens therefor, including the laws of the sales of property, delinquency taxes and redemption of the same, shall apply. The property to be assessed the delinquent charges shall be that real property which is being benefited by the sanitary sewer service provided by the Town or contemplated to be provided by the Town, for which the particular sanitary sewer charges have not yet been paid. This certification and assessment may be made by the Town Clerk whenever any delinquent charges exist. Sec. 13-4-130 Deferral of plant investment fees. (a) For purposes of this Section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings as defined herein: Affordable housing means residential dwelling units for which the annual purchase or rental expense does not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the gross annual income for low-income families in the County, as published in the latest edition of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Block Grant Program Guidelines. Qualified developer means any person constructing new residential housing within the Town who is contractually bound, through financing arrangements or otherwise, by a governmental or nonprofit agency other than the Town, to provide all or a major portion of such residential housing as affordable housing for a period of twenty (20) years or more. (b) A qualified developer may request deferral of payment of sanitary sewer plant investment fees by submitting a written application to the Board of Trustees in conjunction with development or subdivision review for an affordable housing project. The applicant shall submit written proof of eligibility demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Board of Trustees that the applicant is a qualified developer and the proposed project will provide affordable housing in accordance with the requirements or this Section. Adequate proof shall also be submitted that the developer cannot afford to immediately pay the sanitary sewer plant investment fees for which deferral is requested, and that the deferral is necessary to make the project financially feasible. (c) Final determination of eligibility for deferral of sanitary sewer plant investment fees, and the terms and conditions for any such deferral, shall be made by the Board of Trustees. If determined to be eligible and as a condition to the grant of any deferral, the applicant shall be required to enter into a contract with the Town stating the terms of payment for the deferred sanitary sewer plant investment fees, and including suitable guarantees, as determined by the Board of Trustees, that the project shall remain available as affordable housing for twenty (20) years or more. Each such contract shall provide that, in case of any - 7 - default by the developer in the payment of the deferred fees or in the performance of the other terms of the contract, such fees shall become immediately due and payable and shall be subject to the collection and penalty provisions of this Article. (d) Any deferral of payment of sanitary sewer plant investment fees that is granted pursuant to this Section shall not be construed as excusing the performance of any other duty or obligation as required by this Article. Sec. 13-4-150. Civil Action. The Town shall have the right to recover all sums due under the terms of this Article by judgment and execution thereon through civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. Such remedy shall be cumulative with all other remedies provided herein for the enforcement of this Article. Sec. 13-4-160. Violations. Failure to comply with the terms of this Article by failure to pay the necessary fees, charges and taxes and failure to otherwise comply with the terms of this Article shall constitute an offense and a violation thereof. Every person violation this Article shall be punished, upon conviction, by a fine or not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1 ,000.00) or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or both such fine and imprisonment for each offense. Account delinquency for each calendar month shall constitute a separate offense. PART 2: AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 2 (Administration), Article 10 (Water and Wastewater Committee) of the Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of the following new sections: Sec. 2-10-90. Appeals. (a) The Water and Wastewater Committee shall hear and decide appeals from and review any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by any administrative official or Town staff charged with the administration or enforcement of any provision of Chapter 13 (Municipal Utilities), Article 2 (Water System) and Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System), except for any decision or determination made by the Board of Trustees pursuant to said Articles, which action shall be final. (b) Notice of such appeal shall be in writing, specifying the grounds thereof, which shall be filed with the administrative officer or official from whom the appeal is taken within ten (10) days after the issuance of the order, decision or other action that is the subject of the appeal. Failure to file a notice of appeal within the - 8 - prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of the right to appeal. (c) Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the officer or official from whom the appeal is taken shall transmit to the Town Clerk all documents constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken, and the Clerk shall provide the same to the Committee. (d) The Committee or its designee shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal and give due notice thereof to the parties. Upon hearing, any party may appear in person or by agent or attorney. The Water and Wastewater Committee may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed from and shall make such order, requirement, decision, or determination as in its opinion ought to be made in the premises and to that end has all the powers of the officer or official from whom the appeal is taken, subject, however, to the vote requirements specified in Subsection (e) of this Section. (e) The concurring vote of four (4) members of the Water and Wastewater Committee shall be required to overturn or modify decisions made by any Town official or staff upon appeal to the Committee. (f) The Water and Wastewater Committee shall render its decision on an appeal within a reasonable time, which decision shall be made or confirmed in writing and delivered or mailed to each party to the appeal. Sec. 2-10-100. Appeals from the Water and Wastewater Committee Every decision of the Water and Wastewater Committee shall be subject to review by certiorari by the District Court, and as provided by law. Such appeal shall be filed not later than thirty (30) days from the final action taken by the Water and Wastewater Committee. Such appeal may be taken by any person aggrieved or by an officer, department, board or bureau of the Town. Sec. 2-10-110. Fees; Rules (a) All appeals to the Water and Wastewater Committee shall be accompanied by payment of a fee as set forth in Appendix A to this Code for each separate appeal submitted. Said fee shall not be refunded, notwithstanding that the applicant has withdrawn such appeal or that the same is denied by the Water and Wastewater Committee. (b) The Water and Wastewater Committee is given the authority to adopt any rules necessary to transact the Committee's business or to expedite its functions or powers so long as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the applicable state statutes and the Municipal Code, and provided further, that such rules and any - 9 - amendments thereto must be approved by the Board of Trustees before taking effect. PART 3: PENALTY CLAUSES. The following sections of the Fraser Municipal Code contain penalty clauses applicable to violations of the above provisions, and such sections, although not amended, are herewith set forth in full: Sec. 1-4-10. General penalty for violation. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate, disobey, omit, neglect, refuse or fail to comply with or resist the enforcement of any provision of this Code; and where no specific penalty is provided therefor, the violation of any provision of this Code shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day such violation continues shall be considered a separate offense. Sec. 13-2-360. Violations. Failure to comply with the terms of this Article by failure to pay the necessary fees, charges and taxes and failure to otherwise comply with the terms of this Article shall constitute an offense and a violation thereof. Every person violating this Article shall be punished, upon conviction, by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or both such fine and imprisonment for each offense. Account delinquency for each calendar month shall constitute a separate offense. PART 4: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance. PART 5: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PART 6: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after - 10 - passage, adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. PART 7: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published by title only. READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS 15th day of MAY, 2013. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: BY: Peggy Smith, Mayor ATTEST: ( SEAL ) Lu Berger, Town Clerk Published in the Middle Park Times on May 23, 2013. - 11 - C O L O U p peo"Joi dae &i¢Fifto To: Mayor Smith and Board of Trustees From: Allen Nordin, Director of Public Works Date: May 15, 2013 Subject: Improved Readability to Ordinance 404 At the March 20th regular meeting, the Board directed staff to verify and clean up some of the language contained in the proposed Ordinance. In addition, the title language of the ordinance referenced Chapter 13 and it should have referenced Chapter 2, Article 10 of the Municipal Code regarding the duties and functions of the Water and Wastewater Committee. Staff also went through Chapter 13 and revised the language in Articles 2 and 4 making the language consistent in both sections. Please contact me with any questions you might have. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 404 AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLES 2 AND 4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, WITH RESPECT TO WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND CHARGES APPLICABLE IN THE TOWN OF FRASER AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 10, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE WATER AND WASTEWATER COMMITTEE. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com ARTICLE 4 Emergency Telephone Service Sec.4-4-10.Authorization. The Mayor is authorized to sign the intergovernmental agreement attached to the ordinance codified herein creating the Grand County Emergency Telephone Service Authority in order to establish and maintain an emergency telephone service system in the County. (Ord. 180 §1, 1989;Ord. 330 §1,2007) Sec.4-4-20. Charge imposed. There is hereby imposed, pursuant to Section 29-11-101 et seq., C.R.S., upon all telephone access facilities within the Town, an emergency telephone charge in an amount not to exceed two percent(2%) of the tariff rates as approved by the Public Utilities Commission or fifty cents ($.50) per month, whichever is less. Upon recommendation of the Grand County Emergency Telephone Service Authority, the Board of Trustees may, by resolution,raise or lower the emergency telephone charge, but in no event shall such charge exceed the amount of two percent(2%) of the tariff as approved by the Public Utilities Commission. (Ord. 180 §2, 1989) Sec.4-4-30. Collection. Telephone service suppliers providing telephone service in the Town are hereby authorized to collect the emergency telephone charge imposed by this resolution Article in accordance with Section 29-11- 101 et seq., C.R.S. (Ord. 180 §3, 1989) TOWN OF FRASER ORDINANCE NO. 406 Series 2013 AN ORDINANCE DELETING CHAPTER 4 ARTICLE 4 OF THE TOWN CODE WHEREAS, the Fraser Town Code includes outdated provisions related to Emergency Telephone Service that are no longer valid or necessary. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 4 Article 4 of the Town Code is hereby deleted in its entirety. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published by title only. READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS 15th day of MAY, 2013. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: BY: Peggy Smith, Mayor ATTEST: ( SEAL ) Lu Berger, Town Clerk Published in the Middle Park Times on May 23, 2013. l— C D L O R A D Q Finance Update: 05/15/2013 Prepared: 05/07/2013 No financial transmittals with this week's packet, timing is such that financials and sales tax will not be out until the beginning of next week. But to make sure you have plenty to read before the meeting I will include the Audit Report— which Paul Backes will present to you at your next meeting. As I have said before don't get bogged down with all of the statements within the audit—most of those are presented in a way that an investor in Fraser Bonds would be the only one to whom they would make any sense. But understand the time with Paul is very valuable—and you could ask some great questions related to how he feels the town is doing on an overall basis, his comfort level with spending of carry over balances and the like (including how he feels I serve the Town in my position as Finance Manager). Please contact me before the meeting on Wednesday with any questions on the audit, so we can discuss your questions before Paul gets here so you feel comfortable talking about them with him. In addition to the audit reading fodder, I am including twenty essays from Colorado children state- wide. The essays relate to my duties as a Trustee of COLOTRUST— I and the Chairman of the Board (along with other Judges)get to critique and rate each essay. CIVIL sponsors this "If I Were Mayor" essay each year and COLOTRUST provides a thousand dollar scholarship donation to the winner. This year specifically all participants were asked to write about: If you were elected mayor, how would you make your city or town the best place to live? I hope you enjoy them as much as I did, and the bonus for you is that you don't have to agonize over the judging of the essays! As always please contact me with any questions or concerns you might have: 726-5491 X206 or at nhavensa-town.fraser.co.us. Town of Fraser PO Box 370,Fraser,CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Z. C O L OR A D O Treatment Plant Update: • Pre-Treatment Facilities—The bar screen needed serviced due to rocks being washed down from high infiltration flows. • Secondary Treatment Facilities—Adjustments made in operation to compensate for infiltration and high dissolved oxygen. • Disinfection Facilities—Both UV banks are running for increased flow. • Solids Handling—The centrifuge is still experiencing problems with vibrations when operated within factory parameters. We had some improvement in operations at the end of filling the last container; it ran for four hours with no issues. • Site & Landscape—Lots of mud. • SBR—Check and repair the valve installation we performed last fall. The water loss last fall appeared to be too much. There are also a number of pipe penetrations that need further inspection. • Chemical Building—Construction will commence as soon as the weather breaks and provides us with a few nice dry days. Some of the sub-contractors have stopped by for further inspections and information. The infiltration flows are the driving force in operating the treatment plant this time of the year. Please call if there are any questions, (970) 531-1230. Town of Fraser PO Box 370,Fraser,CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com O M N 00 N n N N N N M N I N N I O N I 00 A� W � Ln. L o Q I G o N r-I O o Ql 0 0 0 I r, Ln M II N r-I O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln Ln N N N O O O O (a9W)AVC1 bad MOl3 3nl NON Nns Ivs 1W nHl 43M 3nl NON Nns Ivs 1W nHl l 43M I 3nl a••+ NON Nns 3 Ivs 1W .- nHl L Q 43M o 3nl IQ NON S s �+ Nns " cQ Ivs G 1W 0 nHl 43M 0 3nl NON I Nns Ivs 1W nHl (13M 3nl NON O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O in N O Il in N O r� in N O N N N r-I r-I r-I O O O O (a9W)Atha 113 d M01 3 m O m m N 00 N n N N Ln N N I m N I N N I o N W 00 f� I� S r-I � Ir-I I � m r-I 0 O � r-I C o c O I o 0 0 I Ln M N r-I O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln N O Il Ln N O Il Ln N O N N N r-I r-I r-I r-I O O O O (a9W)AVC1 bad MOl3 3nl NON NnS lb'S 1W nHl 43M 3nl NON NnS lb'S 1W nHl 43M �+ 3nl GJ NON NnS lb'S S 1W U L nHl m m 43M + 4— 3nl I O S NON �+ N n S c0 lb'S G 1W nHl i o 43M 3nl I / NOW NnS lb'S 1W nHl (13M 3nl NON O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O in N O Il in N O r� in N O N N N r-I r-I r-I O O O O (a9W)Atha 113 d M01 3 INFLUENT FLOWS UPPER FRASER VALLEY TREATMENT PLANT Date Day Influent GCWS#1 WPR TOF MGD Influent Flow Influent Flow Influent Flow 1-Mar-13 Fri 0.606 0.241 0.115 0.25 2-Mar-13 Sat 0.7 0.273 0.157 0.27 3-Mar-13 Sun 0.7 0.267 0.151 0.282 4-Mar-13 Mon 0.72 0.208 0.098 0.414 5-Mar-13 Tue 0.474 0.162 0.092 0.22 6-Mar-13 Wed 0.481 0.155 0.097 0.229 7-Mar-13 Thu 0.501 0.153 0.105 0.243 8-Mar-13 Fri 0.706 0.285 0.137 0.284 9-Mar-13 Sat 0.82 0.363 0.173 0.284 10-Mar-13 Sun 0.784 0.345 0.164 0.275 11-Mar-13 Mon 0.681 0.273 0.119 0.289 12-Mar-13 Tue 0.61 0.249 0.121 0.24 13-Mar-13 Wed 0.639 0.323 0.125 0.191 14-Mar-13 Thu 0.662 0.366 0.133 0.163 15-Mar-13 Fri 0.791 0.402 0.158 0.231 16-Mar-13 Sat 0.773 0.391 0.164 0.218 17-Mar-13 Sun 0.717 0.426 0.15 0.141 18-Mar-13 Mon 0.686 0.373 0.115 0.198 19-Mar-13 Tue 0.625 0.361 0.109 0.155 20-Mar-1 31 Wed 0.605 0.347 0.109 0.149 21-Mar-13 Thu 0.6 0.359 0.108 0.133 22-Mar-13 Fri 0.648 0.355 0.119 0.174 23-Mar-13 Sat 0.661 0.379 0.137 0.145 24-Mar-13 Sun 0.655 0.389 0.132 0.134 25-Mar-13 Mon 0.661 0.342 0.113 0.206 26-Mar-13 Tue 0.626 0.34 0.115 0.171 27-Mar-13 Wed 0.663 0.344 0.122 0.197 28-Mar-13 Thu 0.758 0.347 0.133 0.278 29-Mar-1 3 Fri 0.8 0.303 0.155 0.342 30-Mar-13 Sat 0.805 0.387 0.163 0.255 31-Mar-13 Sun 0.811 0.3711 0.166 0.274 AVG. 0.676 0.319 0.131 0.227 MAX 0.82 0.426 0.173 0.414 MIN 0.474 0.153 0.092 0.133 INFLUENT FLOWS UPPER FRASER VALLEY TREATMENT PLANT Date Day Influent GCWS#1 WPR TOF MGD Influent Flow Influent Flow Influent Flow 1-Apr-13 Mon 0.878 0.36 0.153 0.365 2-Apr-13 Tue 0.856 0.352 0.148 0.356 3-Apr-13 Wed 0.837 0.368 0.148 0.321 4-Apr-13 Thu 0.931 0.524 0.165 0.242 5-Apr-13 Fri 0.994 0.535 0.175 0.284 6-Apr-13 Sat 0.985 0.542 0.185 0.258 7-Apr-13 Sun 0.94 0.489 0.18 0.271 8-Apr-13 Mon 0.932 0.475 0.18 0.277 9-Apr-13 Tue 0.827 0.474 0.143 0.21 10-Apr-13 Wed 0.741 0.442 0.117 0.182 11-Apr-13 Thu 0.702 0.439 0.113 0.15 12-Apr-13 Fri 0.76 0.452 0.125 0.183 13-Apr-13 Sat 0.755 0.461 0.138 0.156 14-Apr-13 Sun 0.729 0.46 0.135 0.134 15-Apr-13 Mon 0.657 0.414 0.13 0.113 16-Apr-13 Tue 0.811 0.455 0.128 0.228 17-Apr-13 Wed 0.816 0.465 0.147 0.204 18-Apr-13 Thu 0.732 0.447 0.127 0.158 19-Apr-13 Fri 0.752 0.465 0.133 0.154 20-Apr-13 Sat 0.861 0.505 0.181 0.175 21-Apr-13 Sun 0.969 0.526 0.218 0.225 22-Apr-13 Mon 1.004 0.544 0.201 0.259 23-Apr-13 Tue 0.952 0.505 0.183 0.264 24-Apr-13 Wed 0.842 0.485 0.156 0.201 25-Apr-13 Thu 0.939 0.529 0.193 0.217 26-Apr-13 Fri 1.184 0.608 0.271 0.305 27-Apr-13 Sat 1.369 0.742 0.303 0.324 28-Apr-13 Sun 1.539 0.748 0.32 0.471 29-Apr-13 Mon 1.702 0.645 0.313 0.744 30-Apr-13 Tue 1.648 0.968 0.303 0.377 AVG. 0.955 0.514 0.180 0.260 MAX 1.702 0.968 0.32 0.744 MIN 0.657 0.352 0.113 0.113 r M d O o n�--� n n Ln to N 1 £ Ln lD Q N W Dl Dl Dl Dl O ix CO Q O_ 0 O_ I� Q O O_ O O_ Ln c to = X O > a 0 co Q pn Ln O O O O C = Qt Qt O Qt N Q £ V1 Ln m Ln > fl' Q1 tD tD n tD w n w Q w W W � > O O O Ln Ln n ID N ID Q £ M O O a N ? Q v1 v1 tD v1 VI Ln I, M _ lD lD lD lD O M Q bA ? n > 0 C > b\A W N M O :t 0 £ N N N N O O n :N: > O J >> V ui l7 £aj N on Q I, O N i+ >. O N N VI Q1 C Q £ N N N N N C m N N N O o Q \ CO M w n 7k C W > N JC > ? C n — O > r > C Q ro p Dt W Dt Ln L � ? 6 Ln n W Dpi d £ 0 Ln Di � 00 00 QO N W M F C t0 Q o f0 O O O O_ O O_ > O f0 N b>n O W Q m a ON O ++ Q O O in to C N n n W Il O N p M ro N Q cV 0 0 0 ti j E p £ O w n w W W £ b>n b>n N Q Q1 I� lD Ln Q J D_ >. Q Dl 00 to I� v1 >.\ O O N M O t0 t0 V1 tD D1 t0 bn M M VI M M C Q cV 0 0 0 0 Q £ O O C v O Q O N O O O O -F. > Yk > > Lm v O F on u Q m N 00 O O ++ Q J cy a a 0 00 N Q N 0 0 0 j 0 £ tD lD N N pN 7 w O � bA bA > > Q Dl ID Ln Q J N � l^D Ql N b\A n A N N to Q N O O O O Q £ �D M N N N O O M M O L M i t _ ic=i[,!,((-LL" dm° ' m c £ £ 'a m c £ c £ £ s u > v £ ¢ a u i u ti O O v LL ¢ p o v zc a H zc m v � v ti ti ti CL E F x w � v ti ti ti W D Z O 7 N 0o O F £ ° �o c-i t W r, r, r, m ao Q J r.+ O n lD lD 00 N N 00 00 Dl t m a M 't N W M O Dl 't W O W -i bA N £ N I, ID VI N VI M N VI I, n ID ID } N Z o>n F C pp Q VI N -i lD 7 Q £ N VI VI VI w O W m x f0 M w n M fl Ql lD N r,J 00 00 I� D J O M I, m O O to VI M lD r, N 'DD a to lD O a rV O O rI 0 0 rI b>A £ O O O O O O O O O O O O Q } N J N v Q Q Q O Dl tD -I O W W -1 Q Ew Z Z Z N N N N N N N N Z fo O o O p 4 CL CIO £ F >> £ Ln O O 00 a y M 0 0 0 Q £ bA I� n N N N pp Q n n Ql Ql i+ 7 £ O N a 0 7 Q £ N M M N N d £ W mm 7 X w � W Z b>0 N M O N M O M M N > O O£ c-I CL VI N 0 £ N N N N N M VI Ln N N N 7 D N 00 VI m m w 0 W M U CIO N ri Cl O N b>0 £ 0 0 0 0 N cM-I cLn-I c^-I c�-I Q m O CL > m 0 V c ij ID Ln M M I, O n Vl N O £ N Uj nj N N N N N N N rj 1 ° M N n 00 > > L N N N M 2 £ > £ > J f0 m c £ E E J f0 m c 3 £ E E £ Q a u > u E Q a u > u v Q p o v ar Q p o w CL " in z c a " in z C r J C O L O R A p 0 � PUBLIC WORKS UPDATE (As of 05/08/2013 for 05/15 meeting) WATER— Several Trustees, Planning and PW attended a workshop titled `Water Law in a Nutshell' presented by a former Water Referee, Colorado Court, Div. 4, in Kremmling on May 3rd and provided an excellent introduction to water matters including; Acquisition of a Water Right- appropriation, adjudication and absolute; terminology; measurement practices, Prior Appropriations Doctrine; Attributes of Ownership including consumptive use and augmentation; Stream Calls, Constitution and Statutes, and Federal rights including the Colorado River Compact. ➢ Attended a Stakeholders Input meeting in Denver last week concerning the Design and Construction Standards for Public Water Systems and the proposed changes to them. ➢ See PW supplemental briefing regarding an IGA with the East Grand Fire District for the Town to manage a water line extension project for the District. ➢ Preparing our 2013 inspection and maintenance program for line flushing, valve and hydrant exercising SANITARY SEWER— Preparing our 2013 inspection and maintenance program for manholes and cleaning and jetting of our sewer lines. STREETS- PW staff has been enjoying using the demo street sweeper in anticipation of the purchase of this unit. ➢ Preparing for crack sealing ops later this month. GARDENER— Planning for improvements to the `Mustang Triangle' (Sharkey's) to include a survey, locate of underground utilities and site design. OTHER— See Public Works supplemental briefing regarding an Access Easement Agreement for a driveway across Town owned property in Rendezvous (Roland Rick). Questions? anordina-town.fraser.co.us or 970-531-1844. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Fraser Building Activity 2013 t9c 0 T, 0 R A 3D . Total Number of Building Permits Total for 2009 35 Total for 2010 36 Total for 2011 45 Total for 2012 49 2011 through april 8 2012 through april 9 2013 through april 16 Difference 2013 / 2012 7 Difference 2013 / 2011 8 Dollar Valuation (no hourly fee has valuation $in 2099, 12) Total for 2009 $1,066,056 Total for 2010 $135,233 Total for 2011 $3,743,778 Total for 2012 $2,190,195 2011 through april $81,334 2012 through april $886,503 2013 through april $578,279 Difference 2013 / 2012 ($308,224) Difference 2013 / 2011 $496,945 Building Fees Total for 2009 $13,284 Total for 2010 $3,644 Total for 2011 $40,277 Total for 2012 $27,412 2011 through april $2,140 2012 through april $9,671 2013 through april $6,844 Difference 2013 / 2012 ($2,828) Difference 20113 / 2011 $4,704 New Residential Area 2013 through april 4,407 sq. ft. New Commercial Area 2013 through april 0 sq. ft. New Garage Area 2013 through april 875 sq.ft. New Deck/Patio Area 2013 through april 424 sq. ft. STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPAKI MF..Y1 OF I RAN5 POR I A I I[1N Responsible Acceleration of Maintenance and Partnerships (RAMP) PRE-APPLICATION FORM (DUE: MAY 1, 2013) CDOT has launched the RAMP program to expedite the implementation of projects and solicit partnerships in transportation solutions. The information provided in this pre-application will be used to determine initial basic eligibility under the program. This is the first step in a two-step application process. As part of this first step, applications will be evaluated to determine eligibility. Eligible projects will then go on to the second phase of the process which will require providing additional detailed information in another application. Please fill out the form carefully and provide the requested information. Applications are submitted to Regional Transportation Director (RTD) If you need any clarification on the pre-application form, please contact CDOT RTD, Operations office, or HPTE office. Entities applying for RAMP funding should note that CDOT may request submission of additional clarifying information to process the application. For instruction and other supporting documents, see the RAMP website: http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/RAMP APPLICANT INFORMATION Applying Entity Name(s): Town of Fraser Contact Name: Jeff Durbin Contact Title: Town Manager Application Date: 5/1/2013 Email: jdurbin @town.fraser.co.us Phone: 970 726 5491 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Town of Fraser US40 Improvements Project Description: Working with CDOT Region 3, the Town of Fraser is seeking funds from the Program 2: Transportation Partnership Fund under the Public-Public Partnership to widen a .54 mile segment of US40 (mile marker 228.32-228.86) adjoining the Town of Winter Park boundary. This project is consistent with CDOT Access Code policies for system operation, progression and safety. It meets the RAMP Eligibility criteria, because it can be constructed & implemented within 5 years; is consistent with CDOT policies; and it is an on-system improvement project. The project will leverage State funds with a 35%funding of the cost of the project from Fraser to provide a high benefit to cost ratio for a critical need project- providing for greater vehicular and pedestrian safety; and mobility/operations necessary for the free flow of traffic. Unique to this request, is that the improvements will allow for three independent access permit actions, in two different jurisdictions to be incorporated into one project, making a continuous section of roadway for the betterment of the transportation system. Currently this highway segment transitions from 4 travel lanes in Winter Park to 2 travel lanes in Fraser slowing traffic- causing congestion and an unsafe driving condition. The project will allow for the widening of US40 from 2-travel lanes to 4- Page 1 of 7 RAMP Pre-Application, Page 2 of 7 travel lanes in the Town of Fraser to the edge of Winter Park, incorporating Rendezvous Road, 1 st Street and 2nd Street intersections in Fraser and abutting King's Crossing Road in Winter Park. This segment of US40 is a critical regional link in Grand County—serving as the only means to connect East Grand County to 1-70 and the Front Range over Berthoud Pass. It also provides a vital daily regional linkage within East Grand County connecting the Towns of Fraser, Winter Park and the Winter Park Ski Resort within the Fraser Valley and Middle Park. This improvement will foster the free flow of traffic and will enhance intersection traffic operations - incorporating Rendezvous Road, 1St Street and 2nd Street intersection in their ultimate configurations. It will also give consideration to the signals at Rendezvous Road, 1St Street and King's Crossing Road in the Town of Winter Park. With the intersections integrated into the project the means for safe pedestrian passage, incorporation of transit routes and the efficient progression of traffic will be achieved. Maintaining efficient movement through these intersections along US40 is critical to the economic engine of Grand County— with over 50%of the taxable revenue in Grand County coming from the Fraser Valley. The project will provide a major assist to an area that has not recovered from the recent economic downturn with the creation of jobs, private sector investment and retail sales tax revenue from the local residents and the heavily relied on visitors market segments. This is particularly important to the Town of Fraser given recent declining revenues. We have proposed the project with a 35% local share. However, as outlined below we are open to other scenarios that may involve a higher local share, and/or phasing the project. Key components (check all that apply): ❑ Bridge x Roadway X System preservation x Traffic Management/Engineering x Safety ❑ Transit ❑ Environmental x Other, Specify State Highway/Interstate: US40 Mileposts (Begin/End): 228.34- 228.85 Location Description: US40 in Town of Fraser to a point just north of Town of Winter Park boundary. CDOT Engineering Region (1-5): Three Counties: Grand County TPR/ MPO: Northwest TPR STIP# (if applicable): NA STIP Year(s): NA Project is part of a multi-phased (STIP) corridor program? ❑ YES x NO IF YES, describe: Is this project included in a fiscally-constrained Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)? ❑ YES X NO If YES, identify funding source(s) assigned in RTP: NA Demonstrate the project's consistency with CDOT's Long-Range Statewide Transportation Plan and CDOT Policies: The widening of US40 assists in upholding policies consistent with CDOT's Access Code in the areas of system operation, progression and safety. Is the project on Interstate or State Highway? X YES ❑ NO RAMP Pre-Application, Page 3 of 7 If NO, demonstrate how this project is integrated with the State Highway System. (CDOT reserves the right to determine eligibility) NA PROJECT READINESS/SCHEDULE Project construction (implementation) will be completed by December 2017 x YES ❑ NO NEPA class action x CE ❑ EA ❑ EIS Date completed ...Anticipated or... completion date DEIS x n/a EIS x n/a NEPA ROD x n/a Milestone/document EA x n/a completed: FONSI x n/a CE (part A+B of form 128) ❑ n/a 9/30/2013 CE (part C+D+E of form 128) ❑ n/a 9/30/2013 Design and Scoping Review (DSR) 11/29/2013 Construction Right-of-Way 11/29/2013 Milestone Advertise date 12/20/2013 (proposed): Start Construction 4/1/2014 Finish Construction (Acceptance date) 10/24/2014 Does the project use alternative delivery methods (Design-Build, CMGC, etc.)? ❑ YES x NO If YES, specify: Please provide information on items that have a high risk of impacting schedule (i.e., RR, Utilities, NEPA, TPR/MPO plan amendment): We do not believe that there are any such concerns. Other additional comments: RAMP Pre-Application, Page 4 of 7 TOTAL PROJECT COST (inclusive of all costs) Project cost by phase/task/component Amount Earthwork; Base Material; Asphalt Pavement $449,017 Traffic Signals; Lighting $527,125 Drainage; Sediment & Erosion Control; Construction Traffic $227,764 Control; Signing & Marking Construction subtotal $1,203,906 Design Engineering $120,391 Construction Engineering $264,859 Contingency 30% $361,172 Total $1,950,328.00 Is the project scalable? X YES ❑ NO If YES, provide explanation: The Rendezvous and/or First Street intersection improvements/signalization could be constructed as first phases of the project. Any additional information related to cost: RAMP PROGRAM CATEGORY Please check all that apply and fill in corresponding section(s) below. ❑ PROGRAM 1— Operational Improvements ❑ PROGRAM 2a— Public-Private Partnership X PROGRAM 2b— Public-Public Partnership ❑ PROGRAM 2c— Public-Public Partnership (Devolution) PROGRAM 1: OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS (Additional Eligibility Criteria) Does the project have other available funding? X YES ❑ NO If YES identify funding source(s) and amount Other funding source(s) Amount Town of Fraser $682,615 Sub-total $682,615 Amount requested from CDOT(RAMP) $1,267,713 Total Project Cost $1,950,328 RAMP Pre-Application, Page 5 of 7 Any additional information related to funding: This scenario is based upon 35% local funding, 65% RAMP funding. We are open to looking at different ways to allocate funds in order to accomplish this important project. PROGRAM 2a: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (Additional Eligibility Criteria) Demonstrate Local Support and Political consensus (describe stakeholder involvement in planning, also list no more than five supporting stakeholders and submit letters of support with this application): The Town of Fraser has been working toward intersection improvements and signalization at these locations for several years with significant community awareness and support. The Town Board has previously adopted resolutions of support for these improvements, and is excited by this opportunity to incorporate these into one project which will provide for a much more effective reach of highway. Northwest TPR supports this project, as does Grand County and the Town of Winter Park Demonstrate whether the project is to be funded with tolls and/or significant private partner contribution/investment: (Examples include but not limited to projects in or integrated with the following corridors: US36, 1-70 East, 1-70 West, 1-270, 1-25 North of Denver, C-470, SH93 1US6 Jefferson County, Powers Blvd in Colorado Springs) Click here to enter text. General comments/Additional information: Private investment in these improvements will be in the form of developer contributions. We'd like to accomplish this based upon a 35% local share, but would also like the opportunity to consider constructing some of these improvements in phases via developer improvements. In addition to mitigating traffic safety concerns sooner, this may help reduce overall costs and may increase our local share of the overall project. In this case, we would request that each phase of the construction be considered as part of the local share. Is this a potential HPTE project? ❑ YES X NO Financing Information (if applicable, list funding source(s) including amount requested from RAMP) Funding source(s) Amount Town of Fraser 582,615 RAMP 1,267,713 Total $1,950,390 RAMP Pre-Application, Page 6 of 7 PROGRAM 2b: PUBLIC-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP (Additional Eligibility Criteria) Demonstrate Local Support and Political Consensus (list all affected local governments, describe their involvement in the planning, and a letter of support should be submitted from the applicant): Town of Fraser— lead agency Grand County—supporting agency Town of Winter Park -supporting agency Funding Information (Target minimum of 20% non-federal ) Total Project Cost Amount requested Total local match Other Funding Sources from CDOT (RAMP) amount Amount 1,950,390.00 $1,267,713 $682,615 Source(s) of match fund Partner 1 Partner 2 Partner 3 Agency Town of Fraser CDOT Contact Name Jeff Durbin Zane Znamenacek Phone 970-726-5491 970-683-6275 Email Jdurbin @town.fraser.co.us zane.znamenacek @state.co.us Match Share ($ 35% and % of Total Cost) x Cash (non-federal) x Cash (non-federal) ❑ Cash (non-federal) x Design El Design El Design Match Source R 0 W x R.O.W. ❑ R.O.W. ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ Other If Other, specify: RAMP Pre-Application, Page 7 of 7 PROGRAM 2c: PUBLIC-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP (DEVOLUTION) (Additional Eligibility Criteria) Demonstrate Local Support and Political Consensus (list all affected local governments, describe their involvement in the planning and submit letters of their support with this application): The Town of Fraser is the applicant, and clearly supports the project. Grand County is supportive of the project, and a letter of support can be provided if helpful. The Town of Winter Park has expressed support, and is working on their own intersection improvement project immediately to the south of this project. Both projects share the same goals of mitigating traffic and pedestrian safety concerns and reducing backups/congestion into Winter Park. Winter Park/Fraser will be coordinating designs with CDOTassistance. Demonstrate willingness for Local Maintenance Responsibility: Both Rendezvous Road and First Street are Town of Fraser public streets and the Town is currently maintaining its share of these intersections. The Town of Fraser will continue to maintain its share of the improvements after completion of this project. For official use(whether application meets eligibility criteria) RTD/O pe ratio ns/H PTE Name: Approval Title: Signature: Eligible El YES El NO Comments (i.e., reasons for ineligibility, etc.): Name: OFMB Financial Review Title: Eligible El YES El NO Comments (i.e., share of match, and other financing issues) Chief Engineer Approval Name: Title: Eligible El YES El NO Comments (i.e., reasons for ineligibility, etc.): ESSAY 1 If I were Mayor Being mayor of a town can be really hard or really easy...It depends how well you know your people. If I were Mayor of Commerce City, I would really try to get to know my citizens. I believe that getting to know my citizens would give me a lot more information about what they want or need in the city. Many new and creative thing can be made in Commerce City. As mayor I would build buildings that are useful or fun for the community. I think that creative places in Commerce City would really make the citizens happy. Another purpose l would have as Mayor would be to clean and renew our community, I believe that would be an important part to the city because it would give more life to the citizens and would make them proud of where they five. Cleaning the city would really help the community to have more trust in each other, and they will meet new people and will loosen up to the thought that they have someone to rely on. Mayor of a city can be hard to be but one way that it would make it easier will be to spend time with the citizens. This would let them know that you are willing to play a game of soccer, hide and seek, or even have a picnic with them,just to get to know them and have a few fun moments with them, If I were Mayor, I wouldn't think of it twice. I would be the best Mayor there could be. Renewing Commerce city, get to know my community and spending time with my citizens would definitely be my top goals. Many other people have different ideas but I just want to focus on the positives. Sure there might come times where it will get tough, but as a community we can get through those times and come back stronger than ever.As Mayor I would also never let my citizens get too far apart or let them drift away from each other, I would hoid a few community activities a couple of times a month or just throw a community party. Being Mayor is a really important role in a city. Not many people will care about the people, But i will. No matter how many people say I am not a good Mayor I will always try and succeed in getting my community through all the difficult times. Commerce City could really use a new look and as mayor That would be my first goal to change. Mayors all over the world have different views of how they would run their town .those are three ways i would run Commerce city if i was Mayor. Being mayor is really important and will take a lot of work , but I will be willing to try to run Commerce city. That is how 1 would plan on helping Commerce City if i was mayor. ESSAY 2 A mayor must be selected carefully, for a mayor is like the glue that holds their whole community together. They must have a positive influence on the economy and citizens. The mayor should be looked at as a community hero. Being looked at as a community hero allows for the rest of the community to be encouraged to help improve the community. If I were the mayor of Commerce City, I would positively influence my community by helping to unite all the people in Commerce City, get everyone to contribute to the community's health, and to help positively influence all children in the community. Commerce City needs somebody to help the people understand that they are not alone, and that Commerce City doesn't need to be Colorado's"ghetto". Everyone groups together in Commerce City,but they don't group with the entire community.There are so many people in my community who believe that they have to do everything alone or within their small groups. If the Commerce City community would stop and involve everyone else in the community,we could help our unemployed adults get jobs,help our students learn more,and drag our community away from the "ghetto" stereotype. The people of Commerce City could start trusting each other. I would help lead Commerce City into a state where all the residents are healthy and comfortable. My little city can become better in so many ways if all the residents would contribute to the community's health. With me as the mayor,unemployed adults would be encouraged to look for jobs, do volunteer work fixing/cleaning up the community, and become the kind of adult a child would look ESSAY 2 up to. To encourage volunteer work, with my free time, I would personally go around picking up litter and encouraging others to do the same. I would find out why people have stopped trying to take care of our community. All the gangs in Commerce City would be acknowledged, and given help to solve the conflicts between them. However, gangs and unemployment are not the only problems, our students need encouragement too. Kids that live in Commerce City tend to be put down by neighboring communities. If the adults and community leaders(i.e:the mayor)would give them more praise, students would want to work harder to make them proud. Our high school has one of the lowest graduation rates in the state of Colorado, and the students only need to feel like they are just as good as other students in Colorado to try harder. As the mayor,I would see to it that students would get the praise needed to make them feel better about themselves. After all today's children are tomorrow's future. This would be done by sending out letters of encouragement to all the students in Commerce City at the beginning of December. This extra little push in a positive direction would help Commerce City residents to pull our city together and away from any and all negative stereotypes. Commerce City can change for the better if the mayor helped influence unity, community health, and positive students. If I were the mayor, I would set in motion all of these changes. People everywhere would be able to look at Commerce City in a positive way. All Commerce City needs is someone to influence change in a positive way, and that someone should be me, Sarah Meyers. ESSAY 3 "If I Were Mayor..." Essax The mayor of any city is the face of that city; as mayor I would do my best to promote my city. As gas prices go up, the citizens of Colorado who live farther away from Denver find themselves spending more and more time traveling to and from their jabs. As a result, the trend is to move from rural and outlining suburb areas to the more urbanized cities of colorado. As the mayor of Wheat Ridge, I would and promote my city to attract these incoming people. To accomplish my goal of attracting citizens into my city I would clean up my city while creating a new urban center which my city is lacking since it was built in the 1954's. This urban center will be created with many elements found in new urbanism such as walkabilty, mixed use and diversity, quality architecture, mixed housing and connectivity. While creating a urban epicenter I would also like to preserve many of Wheat Ridge's existing parks. I would like to enhance the tradition of parks as well as the rural feel in those parks. I want to create the perfect balance of urban and rural factors in my city. To attract even more citizens to my city I would want to build a creative environment. This involves public artwork, interesting architecture, and the promotion of small businesses which will create an interesting and antsy feel in the city. As my city promotes small businesses, this will attract the income of the general public which will then result in greater sales tax revenue. Small businesses are a good foundation for any town or city. They attract the public to come and spend money and with the addition of sales tax. The sales tax then goes to help pay the working officials and also to keep the town looking nice. Before all of this can happen we need to attract new and growing businesses. That is why I want to first clean up and create that interesting city feel. If I were starting a family and looking for a place to live, I would want a city with many Ivey factors. One key factor of a city is to have a friendly neighborhood and community environment. Another factor is to have a city with a low crime percentage and have a united community. would also want a municipality that is involved with the schools in that city. Many events for families, the community, and adults would be a great thing to have as well. As the mayor of Wheat Ridge, I would want to be able to have these factor's to attract young families as well as the younger population. These are all things that I would plan to do for my city if I were mayor. I would want to attract citizen using existing elements and bringing in new things to create the ideal city. Wheat ESSAY 3 Ridge would be a city with the perfect balance of new urban and rural aspects. ESSAY 4 "If I Were Mayor..." There are many things that a mayor has to do to make his or her city great. The mayor is the leader and has to be a superior role model for the rest of the city. They have to keep up with the citizen's needs, and take control over things like taxes and the look of the city. I currently live in Golden, CO, I think it is a fantastic city and since I'm now mayor I will do my best to preserve this amazing city. What makes up a city is the citizens. They do their part by filling jobs, throwing away trash/recycling, and paying taxes so they should get a say in what the city is going to be like. My intention is to get the public involved in many of the decisions that will affect them and make sure my residents know that I care about what they have to say. I want police stations and fire stations keeping the city as safe as possible and I want Golden to be a place that parents want their kids to grow up. One thing that people don't like is taxes. Even though we can't cut them out, I assure you they don't go to waste. The property and sales taxes that we charge people go to things like: fixing roads, sewer maintenance, paying policemen, firemen, school teachers, and many other people. Without them,we wouldn't have any of the services that are provided by the government. Because of the current economy,many people have been left jobless or homeless; I know people don't like being kicked onto the street but I will do what I can to help those people and prevent it from happening to more. Scenery is what makes people want to live in a city. Golden is a gorgeous place with plenty of trees and flowers,but buildings continue being built and there is less and less nature. What we need here, are parks and 1 ESSAY 4 golf courses. The greener this city is, the better. Right now there are 253 acres of park land inside the city so let's keep it that way. I believe that the best way to attract people to Golden is to keep the over all appearance good, and that's what I plan to do. As the new mayor of Golden, CO I promise to maintain this city's beauty and improve it everyday. What we thrive to have in a city is people. People that want to be there and feel comfortable and safe living there. An ideal city is made up of places that people need close, want close, and is convenient to get to. Grocery stores, clothing stores, and police and fire stations are all close by while still maintaining the nature in the city and keeping it looking it's finest. My number one goal is to make this city the best. 2 ESSAY 5 Fm the mayor of Thneedville There is an opening for mayor at a town called Thneedville. It needs much help but don't fear. I have a plan to make things better, it involves working hard, to make things right. We cannot do it over night. So I'm here to help the town called Thneedville. The town of Thneedville is made of plastic. People say it's fine but they're being sarcastic. They need some trees and some clean fresh air. We can't find those things just anywhere. We must find some seeds across the big vast land. We must move quickly for we have no time to spare. The people of Thneedville need some clean water as well. The only way we can get some is by digging a well. So these are essentials for a clean healthy town. The town needs some fun. Sitting at home all day is no way to spend the day. We need some sports,activities, and more. We will be knocking on your door, so grab your shoes, get off the floor and get outside to enjoy the world. Some sports like hockey, lacrosse, and golf. These sports will get our town going outside and I almost forgot running. So Thneedville lacks some common fitness, I will change that to show to our witness. The streets are full of trash. We need a weekly clean up and fast. Come on citizens of Thneedville pick up some garbage. You will help your town, don't let Mother Nature have a frown. Check the streets, check the town. Clean up the city it needs no more trash, I said it once I ESSAY 5 said it twice now no more. So we need to clean up the town with the name of Thneedville. It won't be so hard to make things better. Most people would be wondering how we would pay, I've been thinking about this most every day. I know most people don't like tax but this will be going to pay for the great town we're fixing today. The tax will be 7.5%; it will be lowered when we are complete. Doesn't that sound great don't try to compete. I will collect the tax to pay for our future. It will be quite a unique adventure. I would be a great spokesperson for the town of Thneedville. I will talk while I'll do a weekly dance. So I'll give this town a chance to make things great, no time to procrastinate. I will install a jumbo-trop for the town to see our weekly announcements. There will also be rewards for people who care; if you clean up this town you will get tickets to the fair. So please except me for your mayor of the town with the name of Thneedville. I'm only here to help, so please help with me. The town of Thneedville has some great big potential. That's only if we cover the essentials. ESSAY 6 If were elected as mayor,there would be many changes I would make to improve my town. In order to make my town, Dacono, Colorado, a better place, I would help raise more money for the government and establish more jobs for my citizens. To start ofd Dacono is a small town with only a little more than 4,000 residents and only 2.7 square miles of land (in town), and it is very hard to draw attention to this small little town. I believe that by advertising and supporting sonic of the local attractions (such as Blitz paintball, IMI Motorsports race track, and the BMX track in town), we can bring tourists and people from all over the state to Dacono. Tourists will bring money to our town by patroniAng our local businesses. In addition, as we earn more money,we have to find a resourceful way to spend it that will benefit our corrmnuiity. One way we can intelligently spend this money is by building a park or recreation center. These additions can help increase the town's appeal to parents with children looking for a good town to We in. Furthermore, after setting up these centers and parks, our town could use these new facilities for sports. Forming sports chubs could also improve its appeal to parents with young children. Since 34.6%of 1,087 households in Dacono have children under the age of eighteen, it is very important to consider the youth when making these renovations to the city. Also, construction workers and contractors roust be hired in order to build these attractions. So,building these places will ESSAY 6 not only help the towns real estate appeal, but will also provide the citizens of the town with job opportunities. A recreational center could also benefit adults by providing them with place to work out and stay healthy. It is understandable that no city is perfect, but Dacono does have its near-perfect qualities. For example, Dacono's cost of living is about 10.4%lower than the average United States city and it was ranked number eighty-nine of Best Places to Live in 2005. White these are great feats, Dacono also has many imperfections. To start of� 8.7%of Dacono citizens are unemployed. That is almost 360 residents! We can decrease the number of unemployed citizens by encouraging small businesses to expand and by hiring locals as workers for governnnent projects. Next, Dacono is ranked 277 of Best Green Cities. By building parks and encouraging recycling and helping the environment,we can easily make Dacono a greener town. Finally, Dacono has an education index of 12.56, which is lower than about 75%of Colorado schools. By improving the quality of schools, we could entice parents to move to Dacono and enroll their kids in our schools. Obviously, if I was the mayor of Dacono, I would make a lot of changes to improve the citizen's quality of fife and the appeal of the town. ESSAY 7 I've always asked myself what I would do if I were the President of the United States, but now I'm wondering, what if I were mayor? I've also thought, how could I make my small town of Ft. Lupton prosper? After some research, I believe I know what I'd do to change my town. To begin, my favorite part of Ft. Lupton, Colorado is our Trapper's Day. I love the parade, and all of the events that the whole town participates in. It is also so amazing and educational to learn about why this town was named Ft. Lupton. As mayor, I would try to start more events like Trapper's Day. Every summer, my family goes to the small state fairs around the area, I honestly think that it would be really awesome if Ft. Lupton hosted a little fair or carnival annually. Because Ft. Lupton is a small, farming town, I think it would be cute if we had a rodeo. It doesn't have to be as large as the National Stockshow, but would get people to come and visit Ft. Lupton. Because Ft. Lupton is such a small town, and we base our "city's" upkeep on tax revenue, I know that it would be better for us if we have more tourists and visitors. At first, I thought to myself, why would anyone want to come to Ft. Lupton. I always used to say how much I didn't like about my town, but now i've come to realize how much I love living here. I know that we could use a few more attractions, and we could also be better off with a small shopping center. I know as mayor that I couldn't just order the citizens to build another Mall of America like servants, but I could make some suggestions and try my absolute hardest to get a few stores built in one of our many fields. We could include some clothing stores or sporting stores. Finally, I know that education and youth programs are very important to parents, and that is what many parents base their decisions on where to live. I propose that we open up the old movie theater again, so children and teens won't have to drive fifteen or twenty minutes away to catch the latest Twilight. The recreation ESSAY 7 center should also offer more youth programs like less expensive daycares, after school programs, and homework clubs. As can be seen, if the Ft. Lupton Council were to elect me as mayor for a two year term, I would work very hard to make Ft. Lupton a safe, educational dream city. Maybe I won't just stop at mayor, but could use my ideas to help run the nation as President of the United States. ESSAY S Leading as a Whole We think our lives are our own, and don't realize we are part of a family, community, and town. Everyone's life is connected and needs someone to keep it all together. A mayor fulfills that role, with an objective to protect the health, safety, welfare, and housekeeping of her citizens. If were mayor, I would plan ahead in organizing a budget, encourage business, design and sponsor community activities, and use feedback from the citizens. Keeping track of money is crucial, especially when you are mayor. Knowing this, I would make a budget. This budget would keep me prepared and have a limit whenever I was distributing money and collecting taxes. The budget would be spent on creating and sponsoring events, local movements for the environment, making the municipality a great place for business, and cleaning up the town to ensure it's a nice place to live in. All these factors for a thriving and sustainable town require money, and with a budget, I would stay organized. Encouraging business is also a significant factor in a successful town. Being the mayor, it's important to encourage new business and create more jobs for the community. With more businesses, jobs are created, more is consumed, and property is obtained, in an overall income for the town in tax buildup. To persuade reluctant owners who promote environmental or high profit products to move in, I could offer loans or tax incentives because the money will come back in the form of consumption and wages. Businesses provide income, which balances the budget and is why they need to be encouraged. Getting involved with community activities is necessary for the mayor. Setting up events encourages the community to participate. Environmental movements help keep a town sustainable and clean. A kind ESSAY S of event I would sponsor or design would be creating gardens in an open space, because it would use the area without destroying it, reduce dependence on grocery stores, and be good for the town's health. All these ideas for a more eco-friendly town brings its citizens together and makes the community a better place, even though it lowers some tax income from consumption. Being the head of the town, I think it's really important 4 connect with the citizens. I would set up meetings, surveys and a public e-mail which would allow the people of the town to tell me what they think needs to happen. That way, I can determine the skills and desires of the citizens, making them more accommodating to community activities and new business. This makes the town a happier and successful place. If I were mayor, I would base all my decisions on what would be best for the community and its health by planning ahead, encouraging business, getting involved, and listening. Being the mayor is a very difficult job that requires specific attention to details and achieving the expectations of the citizens. The key to leading successfully is listening to your followers. ESSAY 9 We may notice small things around our town and think them of little importance,a worn sidewalk,a loose telephone wire.And though these things may be just as small as we think they are whilst waling by, they also might not. perhaps that broken telephone wire is needed to make an important call,or perhaps that worn sidewalk makes a strolling pedestrian stumble and Fall. These things around our town, though they seem small next to national circumstances, could be fixed up fairly easily if effort was put into them. If I were mayor, I would see it fit to get these things done,perhaps I could even make that call go through,or stop that pedestrian from stumbling on his morning stroll. In order to make my town or city a more safe and welcoming place to live in, I would first increase the rate of our local police and fire stations, The needs of the police and fire men would be very important to me as mayor, as they keep the town safe and out of harms way. I would supply them with up to date equipment that is efficient and modern,so they could react quickly when an emergency arose.Also, the extra attention and care for our emergency officers,as well as their stations, would optimize the work ethic that circulates among the staff. Each would be content with the state of their colleagues and station, so they would have no need or conviction to work any less than satisfactory. Not only would this help the brave men and women who protect us, it would lower the crime rate of the town,as well as prevent excessive damage to citizen's homes and belongings. However,even with modern equipment, policemen and fire fighters wouldn't be able to get to where they need to be quickly if it wasn't for good road conditions. This is why I would improve the general conditions of the streets throughout our town. I would send more money to road repairs,fixing potholes and smoothing rough patches of concrete.This would make our town more functional for automobiles such as fire trucks.Also, I would look into fixing any broken stoplights or loose wires,which would make traffic flow more easily and smoothly.This would decrease the amount of accidents citizens or tourists might have if confused or misdirected by these faulty stop lights or fallen wires. improving road conditions in ESSAY 9 general around the town would be a very useful and well-planned investment,and would give town a safer and more welcoming appearance. These are but few of the ideas I have if I were to be mayor.This would be a great start to make our town more modified and flawless,with less accidents and hazards. By improving our police and fire stations,as well as repairing our roads,we could be taking the first step of many towards making our town a more safe and inviting place to live in. ESSAY 10 If I Were Mayor Being mayor would be a special opportunity to make the town of Rifle the place people want to move to and live. 1 think Rifle is a great community and its a nice place to live. But sometimes people forget the good things about it and only focus on the things that make them mad. Like the trash, cracked sidewalks and rotting buildings. If I were mayor, to fix this problem, I would clean this municipality, I would dedicate a day every year to cleaning up the town. Residents would clean up the trash everywhere and paint the buildings, or take care of the plants. I think this would be a good event, people could donate food, music and more importantly their time. This is a small but growing town and as it grows, there still needs to be community events like this that would bring it together as well as make it a better place. As summer quickly approaches then leaves again, kids everywhere have nothing to do or no where go. if I were mayor I would create more programs during the summer for kids to be active in their community and use their creativity. In Rifle we have this amazing library. They do have programs in the library, but they are mostly for younger children. We should have programs for the teen youth as well. I would make an art program that teaches kids how to ESSAY 10 express their creativity through painting, drawing, sculpting, dancing, singing and acting. There would also be an option for kids to start positively helping out their community. Kids could create and participate in projects that would help the town and community and also provide them with the understanding that there is more to life than staying inside and playing video games. I think these programs would spark their talent and creativity. The workshops would be paid for by the people participating, while the active community program would be free. 1 know that as Mayor you sometimes get to honor people that deserve it. There is a group of people in City Council who has been working as hard as they can to bring this town a Theater and a Recreation Center. This town does not have the funds to proceed so they have put on fundraisers in the past that have done a great jab. I would choose to honor these people because of their hard work with these programs. I would help to start getting funds by increasing sales tax from 4.25 to 4.37.This would help them get going on the buildings. In conclusion, being mayor is so important. People in the city depend on you to make the right decisions that would be beneficial for them and their families. It is important to make sure the people feel safe, feel pride in their town, and that there are programs in the town to keep the next generation active and involved. ESSAYii The economic stability of Englewood, and any city, for that matter, requires revenue generated from the taxation of residential and commercial areas to maintain public infrastructure, basic services, and an overall sense of well-being for landowners. in support of this need, the city of Englewood requires a system of economic and social incentives to encourage homeowners and entrepreneurs, potential taxpayers, to our city.A linear, continuous feedback loop of economic and social attractiveness can help improve the lifestyle of current residents with greater public aid while bringing more consumers, businesses, and potential landowners to the city. This cycle of incentives, attractiveness, and profit guarantees Englewood a self-sufficient and long-lasting stream of revenue to improve the quality of residential life, provide basic services (including utilities and protection) and support construction of public facilities in the city. The sales and property tax of local businesses and other commercial interests accounts for a sizable chunk of any city's revenue; although it seems more money is to be gained by high taxes and large employee requirements, small businesses require a low tax rate to make a decent profit, and will invariably move to counties with them.A stable, lower tax rate on businesses will encourage other entrepreneurs and established corporations to Englewood, expanding the business district, and, as a result, increase commerce to the city in pursuit of shopping and services. This, if successful, influx of consumers and local business popularity will, most likely, draw other localities and larger corporations to the fray in much the same way as television advertising; the large base of consumers means a larger audience for the company's goods and/or services. This may also attract the interest of high asset businessmen willing to construct shopping complexes on public land, obviously entailing the government a cut of the mall's profit and the initial property sale. The businesses that will now come to the city because of the open slots in these malls will even further increase the popularity of Englewood, restarting this perpetual cycle that will fund our city and its endeavors of years to come. Everyone deserves a roof over their head, regardless of their financial situation. While do not believe our government can, and frankly, should simply just purchase houses outright for the less fortunate, we can definitely assist the individual/family in locating housing. The most effective and cast-efficient method in aiding the person(s) in question is hiring a financial advisor to work them through every aspect of the purchasing process, providing explanations on how to maximize the value of each dollar in the property sale. These advisors can be paid with some of the profit from my business- promotion plan, although the participant's aid will be based on the need of their financial situation to prevent abuse of the system. All the people of this city deserve a house-- why not help them get one? ESSAY 11 Englewood requires the solicitation and taxation of both large and small business to help provide housing to those who cannot afford it. Although my ideas are far from perfect, wholeheartedly believe they will at least provide assistance to less affluent individuals and generate revenue for the city. As mayor, these plans would come into effect as policy that can only better our fair city. ESSAY 12 If 1 Were Mayor Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper once said, "You manage things; you lead people." This quote states that by managing situations, one is held to a higher standard. A position in every community that requires committed leadership is a mayor. This person oversees the police and fire departments, education, housing, and the transportation departments. He or she creates ordinances, a piece of legislation ratified by a municipal authority, to keep the town in order. If I were the mayor, I would create a council-strong system, set many goals for myself and the community, and aim to improve our society one step at a time. A council-strong mayor is selected to make decisions for the community. In other words, he or she is elected by the public and is given almost complete authority over the council and the community. As a council-strong mayor, I would arrange and manage a fair city budget. To accomplish this goal, I would start a survey for the public to determine which programs should be funded using the property tax money. Questions on this survey would include, "How long have you been living in this city?What programs are vital to fund? Which programs should be implemented or maintained to keep an attractive community?" Based on this survey, I could create a controlled budget system. Moreover, I would create jobs in our community specifically for our citizens. l believe that as a council-strong mayor, I could provide the best conditions for residence living in my city. ESSAY 12 My job as a mayor is to set goals for the community. One of my main concerns for the community is our next generation. We need to involve youth in our society. For adults, we offer job openings, wine tasting festivals and classes to benefit health, marriage and parenting. However, if I were mayor, 1 would establish goals to create room for our younger generation. I could start a preparatory youth camp to aid adolescents in deciding their future. They would be given the opportunity to shadow employees of the real world. They could become leaders in the community with activities like apprenticeships. These programs could be funded using property and sales tax money. i believe this would provide more knowledge to our younger generation to improve our municipality. Essentially, as the chairman of the council, we are concerned with worldwide issues as well. An important issue of today is controlling the pollution. Obviously, citizens in a city desire to live in a clean, eco-friendly area. As mayor, I would respect each person's desire for a sanitary community. i would assemble clean-up teams of all ages to go out daily and pick up trash around the city. This would allow the citizens to socialize and improve community ownership.The environment is important, and it would be my job to improve it. Mayors play a vital role in the community. As mayor, l would promote the involvement of adolescents and strive for an eco-friendly community. l would make sure my citizens and my councilmembers are comfortable with where they live. ESSAY 13 Fort Lupton is a wonderful town to live in. If I were mayor, though, I would make a few tweaks to make the town even better than it is now. V I were mayor, I would promote and encourage "clean" businesses that would provide good-paying jobs. Those jobs would attract people to come to our city and possibly relocate and purchase homes in our community to be closer to work. This would not only provide more jobs to build new homes, but it would provide additional revenues to our community from building permit fees. Consequently, more real estate taxes would be generated as more homes are built, and the community would collect real estate taxes on the new business's facility. As more people move to our community, retail businesses (restaurants, grocery stores, gas stations)will come to provide goods and services to those people. Those businesses will also be purchasing buildings which also generate additional real estate taxes. Those increased tax revenues will allow the community to provide vital services and provide other amenities such as recreational centers, museums, city parks, etc. I know for a fact that the Trapper's Day Parade is a huge hit in Fort Lupton. Unfortunately, that is just about the only parade we have in Fort Lupton yearly. I believe we ESSAY 13 should encourage mare parades in our town. This may attract tourists to come and visit our small town to see the parades. These parades can be sponsored by retail businesses. Since the retail businesses get advertised, the people may Want to purchase Items from that business. Remember, everything purchased has sales tax attached to it. Eventually, the taxes are added to the city budget. Imagine a bank-sponsored parade. The bank may provide good-paying jobs. People may relocate to our town so they are closer to work. And so, the chain reaction continues and the city gets money. Now, I am speaking about tourist attractions. The Fort in Fort Lupton should be advertised, so it is more popular. I myself have been to the Fort. It is very interesting, and the architectural details are superb. Unfortunately, the Fort is almost in the middle of nowhere. People on the highway just pass it. If they knew about it, maybe people from all aver will travel to Fart Lupton just to see it. They might even buy souvenirs. Of course, everything bought has sales tax which comes back to the city itself If the population does increase, schools should be promoted. If a child likes the school, the family may relocate so the child is close to school. Again, the chain reaction continues. ff I were the mayor, promoting "clean" businesses with good-paying jobs, encouraging parades, and advertising the Fort, Fort Lupton would prosper with more people, more retail businesses, more jobs, and more money for the city for vital services and amenities. ESSAY 14 What Would I do as Mayor? Each town must have a person of authority, their own little president. This person is called the Mayor. As mayor there are many responsibilities involving a budget for the town, town appearances, and the people that run committees. If I were to be mayor I would like to see changes made to how vibrant our main street looks, having more town functions, and finding a way for kids to stay safe but still have fain. These changes are very important because we want people to know that their children and family members are in a safe, well maintained, fun community. To begin my argument on what I would do as mayor, I would start off by adding color to our Main Street. Right now our main street is dull and boring, we need color and paintings. Things that make a person want to stop and say"WOW!1? This town is beautiful," Bringing color to a town makes its visitors happy and more importantly the people living there happy. It would be a way to please the people who live here and make people from all over want to come and see how amazing our town really is. Some where I once heard just by smiling you can make your day better, well what if we gave the people a reason to smile and made our city bright? A second topic I would bring to our towns attention is a fun once a week thing we can do on Main Street during the summer. Towns all around us have street fairs once a week or every two weeks but us. It is a fun easy way to get the community to grow closer, have fun, and more importantly take a break and relax, We live in a very busy community and I guarantee the people of our society would love to kick back, relax, and have fun with some old friends. It doesn't have to be ridiculously expensive, make it so people can set up a booth for free and they can sell items or food. If you wanted a band have a local hand do a street dance. Give the people something fun to do. Finally, for a very tong time our town has been talking about putting in a recreational center so parents can work out, kids can have fun and be safe. We could set up community functions but it's never happened because of funding. If I were to be mayor I would do as many fundraisers, craft shows, or whatever it took so we could have the money to put in a recreational center. Right now we have to drive 34 minutes to a swimming pool. These are the things that are community is in need of and I think we could really benefit from the changes. If we all worked together to find a way to make all this possible we would be an even better community when in reality we are pretty amazing already, ESSAY 15 if l were mayor If I were mayor in the town of Olathe Colorado, l would try to improve many things. My term as mayor would be very productive. Z would try to make Olathe a place where people would want to come and visit. Olathe would be the new tourist hot spot of the Western Slope. Many positive ideas could be put into play to improve our community; people just need to put their time effort (money)towards improvement. Businesses could have a stable place to set up shop. Build new parks and places of enjoyment. In no time Olathe would be the best place in Montrose County. First i would start by having a group of people, including me clean up the town. I would also raise money to help support the cause. 1 could have tools and other improvement items bought so the appearance of the town would look better.This would include planting trees and flowers and other plants with a nice appearance.Then l would repaint most of the relics in Olathe. I would also repair roads that need it and signs. Next I would try to build a library. A library would improve the academics of the town.The place would give kids and adolescents a place to do academic activities.This in turn would lower the amount of adolescents doing bad activities. With some fund raising the library could have a wide variety of books'.This in turn would improve the ability to study subjects and do research. I would buy new books for the library so the children and other people aren't reading books they don't want to. I would raise taxes a little bit to help fund organizations that are in Olathe.These would include the fire station, the police station and also the ambulances.This would make the departments a full time project so that people would not have to wait so long for immediate help.The fire station and ambulances would be able to get to the place much faster.This would make Olathe a much safer place. The police would patrol more often, so the crime rate would go down. Lastly I would strive for more tourist attractions to bring business to the town. This would help everyone by having more people spend their money in Olathe rather than other places. Funding would be needed to build these tourist attractions.The attractions themselves would pay for themselves over time. Once the attractions had paid for themselves they would start turning profit.The business would give the local shops more profit to turn.All these repairs,and cleaning up would help improve the town of Olathe. ESSAY 16 I live in Greeley Colorado.There are many great things about Greeley,but if I were Mayor,there are definitely some things that I would change. When it comes to the funding for most of Colorado's cities,they rely heavily on taxes. Most people in public services (such as teachers,police, firefighters etc. etc.)get paid off of taxes. There are two types of taxes that the people in Colorado pay,property tax and sales tax.The people pay the property tax once a year for being allowed to live in the city.The sales tax is the tax that everyone pays for purchasing an item or service within the legal boundaries of the city. If I were Mayor, I would categorize these taxes. The money from the property taxes would go to the city. It would be used for the roads (signs,sidewalks pavement etc.etc.),parks (bus stations),malls,and hospitals; it would be used as an improvement to the city.The sales tax would go to the subject that the item was purchased for. For example: any item purchased for school would mean that the tax on that item goes to the schools of Greeley.Any item purchased for house care would go to community buildings and public places. If I were Mayor,the tax price would be added onto the original price tag. If the tag said $3,the price you pay at the register would be$3. If I were Mayor, I would start a recycling program for Greeley.The program would ensure that every week the people would put out the recyclables.Someone would collect the recyclables from each house,hotel,and school.The city could use the recycled bottles,paper,and plastic to help avoid filling the Iandfills so quickly. This project would be funded for by the taxes that Greeley already pays. If I were Mayor, I would send some of the leftover money to district 6 schools. In Colorado,we need schools to educate the children to help them make their city,their state,even their country a better place.When we think of the future, we can't let people who are uneducated or not properly educated run the country into the ground.To start,that means that we need the good teachers in the classrooms,and the proper materials to teach the students. If I were Mayor, I would change the city of Greeley in many ways. I would make the projects that I care about happen. I would do what is best for my city,and the people who live in it. Greeley Colorado is a great city.With only a few changes,it can become an amazing place to visit,and a perfect place to live. ESSAY 17 With great power comes great responsibilty. As presidents guide the countries and governors govern the states, the mayors work profoundly on building bright and efficient communitites worldwide. As a crucial figure in a town or city, a mayor is responsible for passing or overseeing local laws written by the City Council. Mayors, also known as commanders, encounter obstacles that affect the general public. If I was mayor of Commerce City, Colorado, i would improve the city's education system, work to improve the safety issues, and make the urban area energy efficient, resulting in the unity of the community. As the population of the human race increases, success in education should expand, creating a hard working and extraordinary society. As the mayor of Commerce City, Colorado, I will do my part in creating leaders for the future. i will work for advanced technology in schools in order to update the knowledge of the fellow students. I will better the lunches in order to nourish the minds of the young scholars. Commerce City often provides bland school lunches making the students wait for an alternative meal in their homes. With a plentiful apetite, a student is ready to concentrate in the curricular classes. As mayor of Commerce City, Colorado, I plan to create a battle for afterschool activities. After school activities will include tutoring, sports and drama clubs furthermore offering an alternative to negative activities and influences. Knowledge will guide society in life and change the world. ESSAY 17 Throughout Commerce City, there is an abundance of children giving a reason to improve our safety issues . As mayor of this busy town, I plan to include a play area in each neighborhood in order for children to run free and feel the wind on their faces. I plan to create community events that are kid-friendly where they are free to enjoy their childhood while raising awareness about the community. I plan to increase the number of speed bumps in Commerce City to reduce the number of accidents involving children. The children are the future, so, as a town, we must reach out to them to insure a safe and well-educated future. As mayor of Commerce City, Colorado, I will insure that our community is energy efficient. Planting trees to purify the air we breathe will unquestionably be planted around town and I will make sure that the grass we step on is green as the leaves of the forests. Littering will be a top priority if I am mayor, in order to eliminate the excessive amount of trash, I will make sure that every one in Commerce City has a recycle bin resulting in a cleaner and more energy efficient community. Provided the fact that the population of the human race is increasing rapidly, the presidents and governors focus on leading the countries and states. However mayors perform the task to communicate to the communities and advance the people to satisfaction. Overcoming adversity and diverse perspectives may fall in a mayor's path, but, through empathy and compromises, Commerce City is able to pursue a future of success. If i am mayor of Commerce City, Colorado, 1 will make the town intellectual. stronger, and greener one step at a time. Society is rapidly growing and the population needs leaders that are capable of compassion. ESSAY 18 If I Were Mayor The mayor position in any community is a very important title to have. Citizens depend on you to make the community a safe and wonderful place to live. Whether that is to ask the state or higher government for grants to provide the city with necessities, or making new laws that make some unsafe activities illegal. As the mayor of my small Northwest Colorado town of Craig, the first thing I would try to upgrade or change is the city's parks and sport complexes. Some parents complain about the city's parks being unsafe and unfit for young children. Many of the park's slides and swings have not been repaired in years. Therefore the slides or swing-sets will eventually break. Also the parks equipment is infested with profane graffiti that young toddlers should not be exposed to. Therefore I would paint over the graffiti or cut down on it by having a higher authority, such as police, nearby to keep and eye on the park. A fair amount of citizens are upset by the lack of activities to do in Craig. As the mayor of Craig, I would strive to build a recreation center. This would be a place ESSAY 18 that kids, adolescences, and adults could all enjoy. For the people who are looking to sneak in a quick workout before work or school, this would be the ideal place for them to ga. Many young athletes who play outdoor sports can't practice during the winter. A facility like this would be the center of athletics in Craig during the winter for those athletes. One of the many problems Craig faces is obesity. A recreation center would open up opportunities for over-weight people to come and do after school programs to help with their weight. The final subject about Craig I would strive to eliminate is the, "I'm from Moffat County" attitude. Everyday, if you come to Craig schools, you hear students say, "I have bad grades because I'm from Moffat County." Citizens should have a reason to be proud they are from Moffat County or Craig. Craig is one of the top oil and coal suppliers in Colorado. It is also considered "The Elk Hunting Capital of the World". Thousands of hunters rush to our sage brush filled fields to hunt our monster elk every year. Lastly, Craig is one of the top oil and coal suppliers in Colorado. Millions of tons of coal and gallons of oil are shipped off all over the state and country. Mayors are a vital part to a community. Many people take having a mayor for granted. They are one of the most influential people in a city or town, and should be appreciated more for what they do. Some of the decisions they make are controversial, but overall they do the community a huge service. To conclude, as mayor I would do Craig many favors by remodeling the parks' equipment ESSAY 18 or cut down on the profane messages written on the slides and swingsets. Someday, I would help build a recreation center for the people who want to do activities whenever they want. Lastly, I would change the attitude of Moffat County. That is how I would change Craig. ESSAY 19 If I was Mayor. . . In the City of Rifle I would have to run for City Council. After my role on City Council, people on the City Council would have to vote for me to have the position as Mayor. That's when the real fun begins, not saying that the position on City Council wasn't exciting, but as Mayor I would have to make the critical decision that would affect the City of Rifle. The Mayor plays a big role for the city. I would be able to decide what to do with the revenue. Being on City Council will work in my favor because now I know the whole process that goes on and what has to be done to help the City of Rifle. Being a citizen of Rifle, I know from first hand experience, the changes that have to be done. My first job as Mayor, I would make Rifle a more intriguing place for the residents and for citizens wanting to move. People would have Rifle as their first pick of choice. I would keep in mind that the budget would be balanced. I would find out how much of revenue we have and see how much the expenses are. After, I would see how much we have left and begin making our streets look better. There are streets that have cracks and I would fix them. There's a soccer field in Rifle that is very large and sufficient. But it does have its disadvantages. There are spots that have no grass and are filled with mud. It contains a hole that can be very hazardous. I would fix that field and make our field very envied. After I have completed that priority I would start the Recreation Center project. The °ecreation Center is estimated to cost 1.2 million. One way 1 would try to save ESSAY 19 money to build it, would be to cut some of the police officers. In Rifle the crime rate is incredibly small, close to nothing. That's why we don't need close to thirty police officers for such a small city with law percentage of crime rate. Also, we will have shops come in and pay taxes to be there and with that money, it will help pay for the Recreation Center. We would need this Recreation Center because it would give kids the opportunity to get healthy and be active. In this city there is nothing to do but go to the movies. Also this Center will make our city seem like pleasurable place to live in, attracting more people to move in. With more people paying sales tax that will lead to a large surplus of money. It will keep kids out of trouble. There are kids that hang out at Walmart because they don't have anything better to do. They mess around and get in trouble there. As Mayor I will do everything in my power to complete or start the foundation for these priorities. ESSAY 20 "If I Were Mayor..." Flash into my future. My community has always been a large portion of my life. Since I have been given so much from the community I thought it was high time for me to start giving back. I have decided that I am going to be the mayor of this fine town. I shall uphold all of the responsibilities that a mayor must abide by. All of the reasons I am doing this is to give back to the community I love. To begin, I know there are a great number of rules when it comes to being appointed mayor. As a mayor I will be held accountable for city taxes, sign official documents, promoting activities of any sort in my town, listen to what my citizens are telling me,ensure that every dollar is spent correctly and evenly, lastly I have to be a part of the community.These are just a few jobs that I must complete and should always know that the town is satisfied.Also as mayor, I must bring businesses in to help my town prosper. Without business we cannot upgrade our city and therefore it is poorer living conditions. So, I will run for mayor under these requirements and I hope that I will succeed on giving back to my community. Furthermore, I must explain what I will do to make my town a better place to live. I know from common knowledge that a cleaner city means healthier living environments. For starters I would try to raise money for a street sweeper.A street sweeper would clear debris that could potentially make citizens sick.This would be around$10,000 to Glean all of the roads in Olathe. Next, I would look into out budget and try to find a business centered on medical areas. Olathe needs a community hospital or just your everyday clinic so it is there at the people's disposal. Now I know for a fact that Olathe has a tight budget and that is why I would try to bring in more businesses.Taxes can't pay for everything. For a next point, 1 believe in creating a waste water treatment plant. Not only would it clean the water, but it would save money for the whole town. It would save money because then Olathe wouldn't have to rely on Montrose so much for water.All of the water in the drainage ditches could be put to good use. Lastly, l propose that Olathe should try to bring in some publicity. As they say, "if you build it,they will come."Olathe should host more events in neighboring towns. If I were mayor of Olathe I would give back to the people. As a job 1 could help the community I love the most.That is why I would be mayor and those are the ways I would help my community. If I were mayor..... W�_M�" Policy Brief W..WT)ILM OE IJUVh"I.0 IU COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of Policy&Government Relations 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, room 275 Denver,Colorado 80222 (303)757-9772 May 6, 2013 RAMP Pre-applications Update The passage of the May 1 pre-application deadline marked the first milestone in the RAMP application process. A total of 247 pre-applications were received from around the state. Listed below is the number of applications received per CDOT region. Region 1- 77 Region 2- 33 Region 3- 50 Region 4- 63 Region 5- 18 Multiple*- 6 *These six projects are Operations applications that fall into multiple Regions,multiple locations,or are statewide. Later this week,a complete list of all projects received will be posted to the RAMP project web page (http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/RAMP). All applicants should check the CDOT website to make sure their application was received. Please call the RAMP contact person for each Region(posted on the RAMP main page)with any questions. Next Steps Over the next several weeks,CDOT will be conducting an eligibility review based on criteria available on CDOT's website at http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/RAMP/project-selection-process. Key dates are as follows: • May 31: CDOT will notify proposers which applicants will move on to the detailed application phase. • July 1: Final applications are due. • September: Final projects selected. RAMP Beyond Applications In addition to the RAMP partnership and operations application process,CDOT advanced approximately $170 million in FY 13 from programs like the Surface Treatment Program and FASTER-Safety. These advancements-which accelerated over 30 projects around the state-- are part of the larger RAMP effort to fund multi-year projects based on year of expenditure,rather than saving for the full amount of a project before construction begins. Responsible Acceleration of Maintenance and Partnerships—CDOT Page 1 of 2 ` up f(m E smn FM UARELESS ALERTS BOOKMARK we � ... s sl 1 Maintenance Partnerships and Overview The Colorado Department of Transportation(CDOT)is changing how it budgets and expends funds for transportation projects. Using sound business practices,this new effort,known as Responsible Acceleration of Maintenance and Partnerships (RAMP),will better coordinate project expenditures and available funding. • Current Practice. Currently, CDOT does not advertise a project until all of the money is"in the bank,"which means the department is saving money for projects over multiple years before construction begins. In addition, some projects take several years to construct-so money often sits unspent when it could be utilized much sooner. • New Practice. Under the RAMP program, CDOT will fund multi-year projects based on year of expenditure, rather than saving for the full amount of a project before construction begins. Background In 2oo6, CDOT instituted a new computer software system called SAP. One of the reasons for doing so was to improve CDOT business and financial practices,including the potential opportunity to change the way we budget and expend funds. Since that time, CDOT has not had the opportunity to change because both state and federal funds have fluctuated greatly.With the recent passage of MAP -21 and the four-year extension of the federal gas tax we have a bit more certainty in the federal funding picture than we have had over the last four years,allowing us to pursue this opportunity. In a time of reduced resources, CDOT is ready to move forward with this new approach to become more efficient and effective. CDOT joins several other DOTs around the nation who are now utilizing this method of project delivery, including North Carolina,who also utilizes the SAP system. Increased Construction, NOT Increased Revenue You may have heard that CDOT was"saving up money"because we were uncertain about federal funding, and now we are"releasing"the money. Not true.You may have also heard we dug through our rather large seat cushions and found a pile of cash without a current home.Also not true. It is taking better advantage of money in the year it is available and looking at all of our projects funds as a whole rather than each project as an individual silo that is allowing us to increase construction.As a result of CDOT altering its budget practices,we will be able to increase project construction by about$300 million per year over the next five years. This increase in construction activity is one- time and is from existing, already encumbered dollars, not new funding sources or new transportation revenues. Not a Solution to Our Transportation Needs While this change in fiscal management will help to fill the gap for a little while, it isn't permanent- it isn't new money-and it isn't large enough to solve Colorado's transportation needs.This is a http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/RAMP 5/7/2013 Responsible Acceleration of Maintenance and Partnerships—CDOT Page 2 of 2 challenge that will require a much greater, statewide effort. Remember that in January, 2oo8 the "Colorado Transportation Finance&Implementation Panel"determined that Colorado needed an additional $1.5 billion each year to help solve our transportation needs. In a very best case scenario, CDOT may be able,over the course of five years,to fill one year's gap. Resources • ACCESSIBILITY Relay Colorado: 711 or(800-659-3656) • Get Connected-CDOT Communication Tools • Employment • Request a Colorado state highway map • State of Colorado Website Travel • Colorado Scenic Byways • Traffic and Cameras • Weekly Lane Closures • Winter Driving Programs • Alcohol and Impaired Driving • Car Seats-Child Passenger Safety • Colorado Bridge Enterprise Projects • Active Construction Projects • Studies&Assessments • US 36 Express Lanes Popular Business Links • Bidding • Commercial Vehicle Permits • OTIS- Online Transportation Information System Transparency • CDOT Financials • Your CDOT Dollar http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/RAMP 5/7/2013 Pte® coU HiStOriCal PO P.Q. Box 105 • got Sulphur Springs, Colorado 80451 • 970.725-3939 • Fax: 970.725-0129 �rc'�L A55®G May 8 2013 Town of Fraser 143 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442-0370 Dear Stakeholders for the Town of Fraser, We are representatives of Cozens Ranch Museum (CRM), a branch of the Grand County Historical Association (GCHA). GCHA is a 501(c)(3), in existence in Grand County for 39 years. CRM in Fraser was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1987, and opened to the public in 1991. With this letter and presentation on May 15, 2013, CRM requests funding from the Town of Fraser. At this time, we request assistance to a matching grant from the State Historic Preservation Fund of History Colorado. We have proposed an Outdoor Signage Project at Cozens Ranch Museum to collaborate with the Fraser River Trail signage, and to serve as a Gateway to Heritage in Grand County. Catherine Trotter of the Town of Fraser Planning Department has effectively and professionally served as one of the project's advisors. From several local bids, the project cost is estimated at$34,804. Our grant to the State Historic Fund is for $26,103; and we now seek matching funds as 25% of the total cost, or$8,701. We respectfully request Town of Fraser funds in the amount of$1,000 towards the matching funds for CRM's Outdoor Signage Project. The purpose of the Outdoor Signage Project at Cozens Ranch is to educate local citizens and school groups, the general public and visitors to Grand County about Historic Preservation, National Historic Register properties in Fraser and Grand County, Community Heritage, and area Archaeology. In interpretive text and maps, the signage will educate, on a 24/7 basis and with access for all, those who frequent Mary's Pond, the Fraser River Trail, and CRM: Fraser Valley's only museum. Signage will be bilingual in Spanish and English. In Ms. Trotter's Letter of Support to the State Historic Fund, it states that the Outdoor Signage project is "a wonderful collaborative project that would help promote heritage tourism...allow more visitors to access underutilized community assets of Grand County's museums and National Historic Register properties..." The Grand County Board of County Commissioners' Letter of Support concluded that, "The proposed signage serves the goals of heritage tourism...Public educational signage is an economic driver." Along with GCHA's experienced staff and board, the Project team includes Ms. Trotter, and Scott Munn, president of the Grand County Historic Preservation Board. Thank you for the opportunity to address the Town of Fraser next week about Cozens Ranch Museum and GCHA's work that benefits the Town of Fraser. Should you have specific questions prior to that time, please let us know through Ms. Catherine Trotter. Most Sincerely. ms`s Kristi Martens, PhD Museum Manger Grand County Historical Association Founded in 1974