HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD10996 BILL NO. 87-189
SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN BORGMEYER
ORDINANCE NO. 10996
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH MILLER
ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA
OF KNIGHT VALLEY AND CIMMARON.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI,
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute an agreement with Miller Associates for the
design of stormwater improvements in the area of Knight Valley
and Cimmaron, for an amount not to exceed $23,000.00.
Section 2. The agreement shall be substantially the same in
form and content as that contract attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be In full force and effect
from and after the date of its passage and approval.
Passed ! ��Jc_C,� 7, /f 2-- Approved
mnm
bsidi Officer r
ATTEST:
City Cle k �
I
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this gam' day of
Ma/-411A , 19H, by and between the City of Jefferson,
a municipal corporation of the State of Missouri, hereinafter
referred to as the "City" with offices at 320 E. McCarty,
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101, and Miller Associates, Building
5, Suite 100, 409 Vandiver Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65202,
hereinafter referred to as the "Engineer" .
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, City des.i.res to engage the Engineer to render
certain technical and professional services hereafter described
in connection with a storm water management study and design in
the Cimarron/Knight Valley area of Jefferson City.
WHEREAS, the Engineer made certain representations and
statements to the City with respect to the provision of such
services and the City has accepted said proposal and is
authorized by Ordinance 10qQ/a of the City Council, of the City of
Jefferson, adopted j22�r.a Ste' , 19 Sr , to enter into a
contract with the Engineer for the performances of services by
the Engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations herein expressed, it
® is agreed by and between the City and the Engineer as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Engineer agrees to perform the
engineering and administrative services described in the attached
Exhibit A.
2. Additions or Deletions to Services. The City may add to
Engineer services or delete there-from activities of a similar
nature to those set forth in paragraph 1, provided that the total
cost of such work does not exceed the total cost allowance as
specified in paragraph 6 hereof. The Engineer shall undertake
such changed activities only upon the direction of the City.
All such directives and changes shall be in written form and
prepared and approved by the office of the Director of Public
Works and shall be accepted and countersigned by the Engineer or
his agreed representatives.
The Engineer will perform any additional work requested by
the City which is not specifically covered in the scope of work
as defined herein at a reasonable fee or compensation to be
agreed to between the City and the Engineer at the time any such
service may be required.
3. Existing Data. All information, data, and reports as
are existing, available and necessary for the carrying out of the
work, shall be furnished to the Engineer without charge by the
® City, and the City shall cooperate with the Engineer in every
reasonable way in carrying out the scope of services.
The City will furnish, as required for the work and not at
the expense of the Engineer, the following items:
a. Property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic,
and utility surveys and property descriptions when such
information is required.
b. All maps, drawings, records, audits, annual reports, and
other data that are available in the files of the City
and which may be useful in the work involved under this
Contract.
c. Access to public and private property, as necessary,
when required to conduct field investigations.
4. Personnel To Be Provided. The Engineer represents that
Engineer has or will secure at its own expense, all personnel
required to perform the services called for under this contract
by Engineer. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have
any contractual relationship with the City except as employees of
the Engineer. All of the services required hereunder will be
performed by the Engineer or under Engineer's direct supervision
and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified
and shall be authorized under state and local law -to perform such
services. None of the work or services covered by this contract
shall be subcontracted without -the written approval of the City.
5. Notice to Proceed. The services of the Engineer shall
commence as directed in the Notice to Proceed and shall be
undertaken and completed in such sequence as to assure their
expeditious completion in the light of the purposes of the
contract, but in any event, all of the services required
hereunder shall be completed within four calendar months from the
date of execution of this contract.
6. Compensation. The City will pay the Engineer in
accordance with the rate set forth below, which shall constitute
full and complete compensation for the Engineer services
hereunder. Such compensation will be paid in progress payments,
as established by the City. The final payment will be subject to
receipt of a requisition for payment and a statement of services
rendered from the Engineer that the Engineer fully performed with
work to be paid for in such progress payments in conformance with
the contract. It is expressly understood that in no event will
the total compensation and reimbursement to be paid to the
Engineer under the terms of this contract exceed the sum of
$23, 000.00 for all services required unless specifically and
mutually agreed to in writing by both the City and Engineer. No
change shall be made unless there is a substantial and
• significant difference between the work originally contemplated
by this agreement and the work actually required.
® For the services covered by this Contract the City agrees to
pay the Engineer as follows:
a. For the services outlined in Paragraph 1 - SCOPE OF
SERVICES, the City agrees to pay the Engineer a fee
computed on the basis of (1) hourly rates that include
base salary cost, direct payroll additives, general and
administrative overhead and profit, and (2) reimbursable
direct expenses. The term "base salary cost" shall be
the actual amounts paid employees of the Engineer, prior
to deductions or withholding, based on each employee's
hourly rate. Base salary cost does not include direct
payroll additives, general and administrative overhead
or profit. The term "direct payroll additives" shall
include payroll tax, retirement, health and accident
insurance, vacation pay, holiday pay, sick leave pay and
incentive pay. The term "general and administrative
overhead" shall include such indirect costs as clerical,
telephone, dues and subscriptions, accounting services,
office supplies, maintenance, depreciation, general
insurance, rent, general taxes, survey stakes, equipment
rental, non-profit salary cost and non profit general
expense. The maximum compensation encumbered under this
Agreement shall be Twenty-three Thousand Dollars
($23,000.00) .
® b. Reimbursable direct expenses chargeable to the project,
which are included in the maximum fee billing above, are
as follows:
( 1) Travel, subsistence, and incidental costs.
(2) Use of motor vehicles on a mileage or rental basis.
(3) Telephone and telegraph costs.
(4) Reproduction of project documents.
( 5) Postage and shipping charges for project related
materials.
(6) Rental charges for use of equipment, including
equipment owned by the Engineer, not included in
overhead costs.
c. Partial periodic monthly payments shall be made to the
Engineer by the City as follows:
(1 ) The Engineer shall render an itemized monthly
statement to the City for work performed and costs
incurred during the preceding month.
•
I
(2) The monthly installments and current total billings
shall not be disproportionate to work progress as
reported by the Engineer.
(3) The entire amount due shall be paid each month
provided the maximum billing amount has not been
exceeded.
7. Failure to Perform, Cancellation. If, through any
cause, the Engineer shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper
manner its obligations under this contract, or if the Engineer
shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations
of this contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to
terminate this contract by giving written notice to the Engineer
of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at
least five (5) days before the effective day of such termination.
City or Engineer may without cause terminate this contract upon
30 days prior written notice. In either such event, all finished
or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
models, photographs and reports or other materials prepared by
the Engineer under this contract shall, at the option of the
City, become its property, and the Engineer shall be entitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
Notwithstanding the above, the Engineer shall not be
relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the
qp City by virtue of any such breach of the contract by the
Engineer.
8. Assignment. The Engineer shall not assign any interest
in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or novation) , without prior written
consent of the City thereto. Any such assignment is expressly
subject to all rights and remedies of the City under this
agreement, including the right to change or delete activities
from the contract or to terminate the same as provided herein,
and no such assignment shall require the City to give any notice
to any such assignee of any actions which the City may take under
this agreement, though City will attempt to so notify any such
assignee.
9. Confidentiality_ Any reports , data, or similar
information given to or prepared or assembled by the Engineer
under this contract which the City requests to be kept as
confidential shall not be made available to any individual or
organization by the Engineer without prior written approval of
the City.
10. Nondiscrimination . The Engineer agrees in the
performance of this contract not to discriminate on the ground or
because of race, creed, color, national origin or ancestry, sex,
• religion, handicap, age, or political opinion or affiliation,
against any employee of Engineer or applicant for employment and
shall include a ^Amilar provision in all subcontracts let or
awarded hereunder.
11. Independent Contractor. The Engineer is an independent
contractor and nothing contained herein shall constitute or
designate the Engineer or any of its agents or employees as
agents or employees of the City.
12. Benefits Not Available. The Engineer shall not be
entitled to any of the benefits established for the employees of
the City nor be covered by the Workmen's Compensation Program of
the City.
13. Liability. The parties mutually agree to the following:
a. In no event shall the City be liable to the Engineer for
special, indirect, or consequential damages, except
those caused by the City's negligence, arising out of or
in any way Connected with a breach of this contract. The
maximum liability of the City shall be limited to the
amount of money to be paid or received by the City under
this contract.
b. The Engineer shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City
harmless from and against all claims, losses, and
liabilities arising out of personal injuries, including
death, and damage to property which are caused by the
® Engineer arising out of or in any way connected with
this contract.
14. Documents. That reproducibles of tracings and maps
prepared or obtained under the terms of this Contract shall be
delivered upon request to and become the property of the City
upon termination or completion of the work. Copies of basic
survey notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data
prepared or obtained under this Contract shall be made available,
upon request, to the City without restrictions or limitations on
their use. When such copies are requested, the City agrees to
pay the Engineer its cost of copying and delivering same.
15. Nonsolicitation. The Engineer warrants that he had not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona
fide employee working solely for the Engineer, to solicit or
secure this Contract, and that he has not paid or agreed.to pay
any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for the Engineer, any fee, commission, percentage,
brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon
or resulting from the award or making of this Contract. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the
right to annul this Contract without liability, or, in its
discretion, to deduct from the Contract price or consideration,
or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or contingent fee.
16. Books and Records . The Engineer and all his
® subcontractors shall maintain all books, documents, papers,
accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs
incurred in connection with this Contract, and shall make such
materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable
times during the Contract and for a period of three (3) years
following completion of the Contract.
17. Delays. That the Engineer shall not be liable for
delays resulting from causes beyond the reasonable control of the
Engineer; that the Engineer has made no warranties, expressed or
implied, which are not expressly set forth in this Contract; and
that under no circumstances will the Engineer be liable for
indirect or consequential damages.
18. All notices required or permitted here3.nunder and
required to be in writing may be given by first class mail
addressed to City at 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, Missouri
65101, and Engineer at Building 5, Suite 100, 409 Vandiver Drive,
Columbia, Missouri 65202. The date of delivery of any notice
shall be the date falling on the second full day after the day of
its mailing.
Executed this day of CL 19
CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
By
OR
ATTEST:
��,�.,�,.,..,:.�- ..mac. _•� ,
CITY CLERIC
ENGINEER
By
i
PROPOSAL
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
CIM."tARON/KNIGHT VALLEY
DRAINAGE STUDY
FEBRUARY. 1988
I
Prepared *by
Miller Associates
Engineers, Planners & Surveyors, Inc.
i 409 Vandiver Drive
Building 5, Suite 100
Columbia, Missouri 65202
(314) 443-1666
i MILLER ASSOCIATES
eAL\ ENGINEERS. I'I.ANNERS d: SURVEYORS. INC.
i
February 3. 1988
Mr. Robert M. Bates, PE
Director of Public Works
City of Jefferson
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
RE: Cimmaron/Knight Valley Storm Water Management
Dear Mike:
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the needs of the City of
Jefferson For a Storm Water Management Study and Design in the Cimmaron
/Knight Valley area of Jefferson City, Missouri. We have reviewed the
information that you made available to us and have prepared a proposed
approach to determine the available options to mitigate the flooding
problems in the Cimmaron/Knight Valley neighborhood. We have includued
what we feel is a reasonable level of effort to satisfy the City of
Jefferson and the public. We will be happy to discuss any desired
revisions, or levels of effort with you, and modify the scope of work
as needed. The dollar amounts may require some modification dependent
on the form of contract desired by 'the City. As we reviewed the
I information that you provided us, it became apparent that the two
locations which were discussed for detention basins north of Cimmaron
Drive appear to be the most promising areas to provide the greatest
impact on the remainder of the drainage basin. In addition to this,
there appears to be an area to the south of Cimarron Drive which a
small basin may be needed in conjunction with the upper two to minimize
the impact on the downstream owners.
The second portion of the attached proposal covers a proposed study
for the major portion of this drainage basin to the west of Tanner
Bridge Road. It is my feeling that this study should be done at the
same time as the eastern portion, due to the longer travel distance
(time of concentration) from the west. If we modify the peak flow on
the eastern portion, the combined peak on the channel south of Hoffman
Drive could actually be increased!
I
IIuiWing 5. Stihc 100,•109 %laiulkvi- I)rkv. Coliimbia. \I()65202, 31-1-•I 13.1666
i
i
Mr. Bates
February 3. 1988
Page 2
Based on our lack of specific information concerning the elevations of
the various structures, the actual location of flooding, and
determination of what the ultimate solution may be. we believe it will
be difficult to provide an accurate estimate of the time, effort. and
cost for the design actual of the improvements. The design could
range from one or two simple detention basins north of Cimmaron to
three detention basins. culvert improvements, and/or channel
improvements at various locations. We have included a third portion of
this proposal as an example of what the possible design costs could be.
Should you have any questions concerning any of these items, or if you
see areas in which you would desire a modification of our level of
effort. please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours truly,
*TILLER ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS. P aNNERS & SURVEYORS, INC.
l�
ohn V. Huss, PE
Director of Production
JVH:ju
Enclosures
I
PROPOSAL
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
CIMMARON/KNIGHT VALLEY DRAINAGE. STUDY
PART I: STUDY EAST SIDE TANNER BRIDGE ROAD.
On January 28, 1988, engineers from Miller Associates visited with Mr.
Mike Bates. Director of Public Works. and several other staff members
to review the storm drainage problems in the Cimmaron/Knight Valley
area. Based upon this review, it appears that the City of Jefferson
has a substantial amount of background information which will be of
assistance in determining an economical and satisfactory solution to
the storm problems within this subdivision. Little specific
information is available with respect to the topography, actual field
conditions of the various culverts, channel, and finish floor
elevations of the residences which are experiencing flooding problems.
Based on this. it would seem that the most cost-effective way to
approach the problems in this area would be to gather enough specific
information concerning the drainage basin to determine what type of
solution will be the most cost-effective to mitigate or eliminate the
flooding problems that residents in this area are experiencing;. Based
on this, the following process is recommended for the study and
recommendation to the City concerning this drainage basin.
1 . Information Gathering. The Engineer will meet with staff
members of the City of Jefferson and attend a public meeting set
up by the City of Jefferson concerning the drainage basin in
order to gather all available information concerning the precise
locations and extend of flooding within this drainage basin.
2. Field Reviews. After the public meetings and staff meetings have
been held, the Engineer will make a detailed field review of
the drainage basin to specifically identify e
requiring either detailed survey work or minimal surveying.
3. The Engineer will field survey the stream alignment, gradient of
the flow line, and top of bank, building locations and low floor
elevations, existing culvert geometries and elevations along
with the roadway elevations and geometries. This work will be
done using a total station and will provide a random baseline
and control fox, any future design improvements within this
basin.
l
4. Information from the survey will be dumped from a data
collector into the computer and the computer will plot this
information. Utilizing this computer plot along with tax maps,
subdivision plats. street plans. and other available data. the
Engineer will draft base sheets of the entire drainage basin
along with a gradient profile of the stream.
S. The Engineer will computer model. the existing drainage basin
based upon full future developmental conditions of the upper
reaches of the basin along with development of those lots which
are currently vacant.
b. The Engineer will tabulate all public information. drainage
data, and survey data. The Engineer will analyze the drainage
system and specifically look at the following items; placement
of a detention basin tributary to the northwest of Cimmarion
Drive. placement of a detention basin in the northeast tributary
north of Cimmaron Drive. placement of a detention basin south
of Cimmaron Drive and north of Carousel Drive, various
combinations of the above detention basins. their effects on the
downstream property owners, and analysis of the existing
drainage structures under the roadways. The locations of the
variou3 possible detention areas and culvert locations are shown
on the attached drawing.
7. all data will be evaluated and preliminary cost estimates for
the various options will be generated and a report outlining the
various options and recommendations of the options will be
presented.
This report will also provide all the technical information along with
the profiles that would be expected after the recommended improvement
is constructed. This stream profile data would enable the City of
Jefferson to place low floor elevation restrictions on the various lots
which have not been developed to minimize the possibility of flooding.
The following is a breakdown of the hours that we believe are necessary
for the various tasks needed to complete this study. This LOF is
presented to demonstrate the detailed manpowerwe anticipate in
completing this study.
STUDY - PART I - East of Tanner Bridge Road
CODE 2 MA': COST
No. DESCRIPTION PM ENGR DRAFT CREW CLERK ADMIN (S)
I Ol Proj. tingt/Admin 4 4
02 Client Meetings 6 V 3U
03 Public Meetings 3 3 15
05 Work Plans 1 2 2
07 Q/A 2 4 2
10 Draft Drain. Base
Map (30-40 Scale) 24
11 Field Review G 15
20 Comp. Model-System
Post Dev. 8
21 Tabulate Public/
Survey Data 3
22 Analyze Det
Locations - NW
- NE 2
- Ctrl. 2
- Combination 8
- Culverts 4
23 Evaluate Data 2 4
24 Cost Estimates-Prelim 4
25 Draft Report- 6
Recommendations 4 12
70 Surveys i0
80 Painting-Drawings/ 4 200
Report
18 62 48 30 18 ____6'200
Based on the level of effort being proposed in the preceding table,
the cost for this work would range from $7,475 to $8,915.
._
IF
�, • ; ; ��° PHASE I STUDY
Cimarron/Knight n'ght i/alley
,
Detention
LL
POSSIBLE DETENTION FACILITIES
�\ POSSIBLE DETENTION FACILITY
.� l
CULVERTS I
\\ \ CULVERT \ 'j
• • '
,o CULVERT
• s
CULVERTS
i
PART 11 - STUDY URAINAGE AREA - WEST OF TANNER BRIDGE ROAD
The second part of this proposal is for the study of the drainage area
primarily to the west of Tanner Bridge Road. A study approach to this
drainage basin would have many similarities to that of the developed area
east of Tanner Bridge Road, but would not be as detailed in the area of
specific design elevations and profiles. We do not believe that any
surveying over and above that part outlined in the first phase of the
study would be necessary for this study. The following is an outline of
the proposed tasks necessary to complete this study.
i
1. Meeting would be held with the client to obtain all specific
information available on this drainage basin including
information having to do with street drainage culverts, Highway
Department data, and land use and ownership maps.
2. A field review would be done to obtain some specific design data
with respect to sizes of existing culverts, available headwater
depth, etc.
3. a preliminary drainage map would be developed by blowing up a
USGS map to a larger scale to enable some more detailed
analysis of the drainage basin.
4 . The drainage basin would be modeled utilizing flows after
development has occurred to determine impact of culverts and
drainage channels on the existing; downstream development and
possible future development.
5. "filler Associates would then analyze placing detention basins in
three areas as is shown on the attached drawing and analyze the
existing culverts and channel characteristics to determine the
feasibility and sizing of possible detention facilities.
6. Miller Associates would then evaluate the data, prepare
preliminary cost estimates for the option and draft a report
including
of tforsfuture development control aof this
basin
basin with respect to future. runoff.
7. The following is a task and hour breakdown showing the specific
levels of effort that we believe necessary the
various facets of this study.
i •
i
i
TUUT - PART 11 - W. SIDE TANNER BRIDGE ROAD
'OUE 2 MAN COST
o, DESCRIPTION PM ENGR DRAFT CREW CLERK ADMIN (S)
1 Pr0j . Mngt:/Admin 4 4 6
)2 Client Meetings 6 6 3U
5 Work Planning 2
)7 Q/A 2 2 1 2
0 Field Review-Gather
Data (Culvert size.
avail , head. etc. ) 6 1'
30 Prep. Map. D.A.-
Blow-Up USGS- 2'e 3' 8
31 model D.A. - Calc Flows 8 3
32 analyze Detention
locations/culverts
3. plus combinations 8
33 Evaluate Data 2 4
34 Prelim Cost Est, 3
35 Draft Reports 6 8 6
31 Printing Reports/ 4
Drawings
14 45 20 16 6 145
The estimated cost for this work is $4,310 to $5.150.
.jam•+- •�•• �3 • . • 00, .\� •``f s' :y' J•
. t
• • k. PHASE 2 STUDY
s . Ito
' '�• Tanner Bridge Road Vest
CULVERT l •�• " ` ..�.7:\
- Nv�,.:
POSSIBLE DETENTION FACILITIES �'U •`��'
Jll
\\ CULVERTS
c '
O
1 CULVERT
• V \ �`
(� - �N%
DESIGN PROPOSAL
it is the understanding of Miller Associates that due to the time of year
and the desire of the City of Jefferson to construct improvements during
the 1988 construction season that the City desires to obtain a proposal
for design services for the improvements in the drainage basin east of
Tanner Bridge Road. It is very difficult to establish specific costs and
scope of services when the actual design concept has ,vet to be
established. Therefore, we have included a proposed design scope which
may be included in a contract that would cover a moderate amount of
improvements to this drainage basin.
The assumed design scope would be the design of two detention basins one
in each tributary north of Cimmaron Drive; improvement of two culverts
under Cimmaron Drive, the culvert under Carousel, the private culvert
between Cimmaron and Carousel, and the box culvert under Hoffman Drive.
along with the drainage ditche to the east of the box culvert also on
Hoffman Drive.
It is anticipated that no surveying would be needed for the culvert
improvements over and above that done in the study phase. Hours are
included for a boundary survey of the 2 detention basin areas, legal
descriptions for acquisition, topographic surveys for design. and rack
probes which would be done with our own drill rig. The surveying would be
accomplished with a total station. The information would be input
directly into the computer and a plot would be generated for a preliminary
design. A final engineering design of the two detention basins and
culvert upgrading along with technical specifications would then be
generated. No bid documents or bid services would be proposed as a part
of this project. A quantity takeoff and a cost estimate would be
included.
Upon completion of plans and specifications final meeting with be held
with client to review final plans for approval.
The following is table of the proposed design tasks and manpower hour
loadings,
DESIGN - 2 BASINS. 7 CULVERTS
CODE 2 MAN COST
NO DESCRIPTION PM ENGR DRAFT CREW CLERK ADMIN ($)
01 Project Mn.t.-Admin 4 6
02 Meetings 6 6 2 30
05 Work Plans 1 2
07 Q/A 2 6 2 1
10 Field Review-Prelim
Staking 5 1 15
30 Prel. Drafting 8
31 Prel. Engr/Des . 16
32 Des, Evaluation 2 4 1
33 Final Des. Plans 10
34 Final Drafting 32
35 Tech Specifications 4 4
36 Quantity Take-Off
Cost Est. 4 6
37 Rock Borings 500 t
70 Boundary Surveys 1 7 8 2
71 Topographic Surveys 2 6
72 Survey Supervision 2
73 Legal Desc.-Bldg. Survey 1 3 1
80 Printing Plans/Specs. 4 150
14 60 60 14 18 6 695
This proposal and manpower hour loadings is based on the design of two
detention basins north of Cimmaron and the upgrading of seven culverts.
If during the study phase it is determined that a lesser level of effort
is necessary, we would easily be able to scale back the level of effort.
If after the report has been presented, it is determined that the actual
design is in excess of the assumed design scope as outlined above, such as
full survey of the entire channel and construction of a channel liner for
the entire drainage system, we would feel that some renegotiation of this
portion of the design contract would be justified. The design fees for
the preparation of plans and specifications in conformance with the above
outlined scope of services would range $7,360 to $8,650.