HomeMy Public PortalAbout2003-05-06 PC MinutesVillage of Plainfield Planning Commission Record of Minutes Date: May 6, 2003 Location: Village Hall Early Session Another session of the ongoing Detention Pond discussions took place at 6:30pm. The following is a synopsis of the discussion. Ms. Sheetz said Steve Amann will talk about the engineering and functionality aspects of detention ponds tonight. Commissioner Kachel asked if there was any way to remedy the fact that members of the audience can’t hear the commissioners and speakers at times . Ms. Sheetz said that she would turn up the microphones. Mr. Amann spoke to the commission about the pond itself and the release structure. • One battle you fight in designing a sight is finding the right release rate and a design that allows for conven ient future maintenance. • You want to have an overflow notch in the detention area so that overflow water can be dispersed. • Grass bottom ponds can be used for recreational activities when they aren’t holding water – they just need to be mowed. Wet bottom p onds are more complicated. The design requirements try and postpone maintenance for as long as possible. • Regarding aeration, there are a couple benefits: it provides an aesthetic value (ambient sound, rippling water, etc.) and also prevents stagnation and algae buildup. Commissioner Henry pointed out that there is a wide variety of aeration methods in existence. Chairman Sobkoviak said that the club that he belongs to uses a aeration system that moving water through an aerating shelter of sorts and bac k to the main water system. Commissioner Kachel asked if there is anything on the books that requires that, once a development goes in, something has to be done about silt buildup in the ponds. Commissioner Henry said that the homeowners’ associations ha ve an incentive to maintain the ponds – if they don’t their sump pumps won’t have anywhere to pump to. Commissioner Kachel said that Village should force the maintenance of ponds. 1
Mr. Amann said he wasn’t sure how the Village would go about enforcing tha t. He also said that you can allow the buildup of sediment without endangering the functionality of the pond. Commissioner Kachel said that if people don’t take care of their detention ponds, it doesn’t just affect them, it can affect others from a diffe rent subdivision that is in the path of the flow of water. Commissioner Schinderle asked Mr. Amann what the commission should be looking for when a developer comes in with plans for a detention pond. Mr. Amann said that the engineering specifics can be l eft to the Village Engineer, but that the commission should look to see that the ponds follow what is required in the ordinance and follows good engineering practices. Chairman Sobkoviak suggested that the Commission should not micromanage – we always hav e the stipulation that the developer must “comply with the requirements of the Village Engineer”. Commissioner Schinderle wondered if changes should be made to the ordinance to reflect what has been discussed at these meetings so future developers know wh at we are looking for. Mr. Amann said that one thing the Commission could look at is the landscaping surrounding the detention pond. Ms. Sheetz emphasized this point. Mr. Amann said that, though the ordinance doesn’t specify the number of plantings requ ired around these ponds, there are ways of making these structures very beautiful. Commissioner Kachel recommended having the developer pay up front a percentage of the cost of dredging the pond 20 years in the future. Ms. Sheetz said that we are coming to the end of the sessions on detention ponds – does the Commission want to have a summary session? Commissioner Henry said yes, and that the summary should serve as a tool for building a report for the trustees that reflects our suggestions on this subje ct. Commissioner Schinderle said we need to start documenting what we’ve said we expect developers to do regarding detention ponds. Ms. Sheetz said staff will meet to discuss the creation of such a report. Perhaps we could postpone the meeting for two w eeks. 2
Mike Garrigan said that Mr. Hoffman from Teska will come in during our next meeting to talk about zoning law from 6:30pm to 7:00pm. Chairman Sobkoviak thanked Stephanie Sheetz and Steve Amann and everyone who contributed to these sessions for all t heir hard work and a job well done. Regular Session Chairman Sobkoviak called the meeting to order at 7:02pm. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Kachel, Henry, Gehrke, Schinderle, Anderson, Sobkoviak Absent: Commiss ioner Manning, School District, Library District, Fire District, Park District Minutes The minutes from the April 15, 2003 meeting were accepted as presented. Chairman Sobkoviak asked Mike Garrigan what the status of Wal -Mart was. Mr. Garrigan said that there have been some post -trial motions, and that is all he has heard with respect to that case. Old Business CASE NO.: 1028 -031003.SU MAGNOLIA COFFEE SHOP Request: Special Use (Public Hearing) Location: 530 W. Lockport Street Applicant: Edw ard & Peg Megrant Commenced: 7:05pm Stephanie Sheetz gave the staff report. Commissioner Schinderle asked if the applicant has given any indication as to how they are going to police their outdoor seating. 3
Carl Bryant spoke for the applicant: Peg and Ed [Megrant] have managed a very well run restaurant. During the course of the day, if anyone parks a stroller, bike, etc. they will simply ask them to move it. Commissioner Schinderle said he still wasn’t clear how they are going to police that. Mr. Brya nt said the owners would be vigilant, and make sure that only patrons of the restaurant use the outdoor seating and that those patrons use the seating appropriately. Commissioner Kachel said that the sidewalk appears to be quite narrow; during a festival these seats should be left out so that the people have a place to sit. Ordinarily people are forced to sit on the curbs and sidewalks due to lack of seating. Chairman Sobkoviak said that people with strollers can cause problems if they are ignorant and d on’t adhere to common decency by putting their strollers anywhere they please. Commissioner Henry asked why the special use permit was being limited – why not just revoke it if it’s being abused? Commissioner Henry said that he has two concerns. His fir st is trash blowing off of the tables and littering the surrounding area. The second is that the owners should not be allowed to put signs on the tables to advertise because we don’t afford that to other businesses. Commissioner Kachel suggested rewordin g stipulation 6 in the staff report so that it reads “…shall be renewable after 5 years”. Commissioner Anderson asked if there was anything in the stipulations that says the tables cannot be made of plastic. Ms. Sheetz said that there is nothing in the s tipulations, but that she knows the applicants already have tables made of iron. Chairman Sobkoviak opened the meeting up to public comment at this time. Ed Megrant , applicant, said that the sidewalk is actually pretty big. Those people with whom we’ve spoken have agreed to abide by the rules that will exist regarding outdoor seating. Commissioner Kachel moved to recommend approval of the special use permit for Magnolia Coffee Shop (530 W. Lockport) for an outdoor eating area subject to the following si x (6) stipulations: 1. That the owner will limit any outdoor area to the eastern 26 inches of the public sidewalk as demonstrated in the photo and plans attached as Exhibits 4
A &