Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutBOH 2.7.24 packetE W 0 0 S Town of Brewster Board of Health 2198 Main St., Brewster, MA 02631 0 brhealth@brewster-ma.gov �i V -k (508) 896-3701 RPOR , " "05 BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING AGENDA 2198 Main Street February 7, 2024 at 6:30PM Board of Health This meeting will be conducted in person at the date, time and location identified above. This means that at least a quorum of the members of the public body will attend the meeting in person and members of the public are welcome to attend in person as well. As Penny Holeman a courtesy only, access to the meeting is also being provided via remote means in accordance with applicable law. Please note that while an option for remote attendance and/or participation is being provided as a courtesy to the public, the meeting/hearing will not be suspended or terminated if technological problems interrupt the virtual broadcast or affect remote attendance or participation, Kimberley Crocker unless otherwise required by law. Members of the public with particular interest in any specific item on this agenda, which includes Pearson an applicant and its representatives, should make plans for in-person vs. virtual attendance accordingly. David Bennett Members of the public who wish to access the meeting may do so in the following manner: Phone: Call (301)715-8592 or (312)626-6799. Webinar ID; 820 4394 4509 Passcode: 979174 John Keith To request to speak: Press *9 and wait to be recognized. Zoom Webinar. htt. s://usO2Web.zoom.us/.*/82043944509? wd=M. - M2kvUExKbU1RSOhmM01Zb3d ZzO Abigail Archer Passcode: 979174 To request to speak: Tap Zoom "Raise Hand", then wait to be recognized. When required by law or allowed by the Chair, persons wishing to provide public comment or otherwise participate in the meeting, may do so by accessing the meeting remotely, as noted above. Additionally, the meeting will be broadcast live, in real time, via Live broadcast (Brewster Government TV Channel 18), Livestream (fivestrearn.brewster-ma.gov) or Video recording (tv.brewster- ma.gov) Health Director 1. Call to Order Amy von Hone 2. Declaration of a Quorum Assistant Health 3. Recording Statement Director 4. Chairman's announcements 5. Citizen's forum: Members of the public may address the Board of Health on matters not on the meeting agenda for a Sherrie McCullough maximum 3-5 minutes at the Chair's discretion. Under Open Meeting Law, the Board of Health is unable to reply but may add items presented to a future agenda Senior Department 6. Ocean Edge Trevor Lane, System 12-1 failed septic upgrade with I/A installation Assistant 7. 9-15 Lower Road, failed septic upgrade with I/A installation Tammi Mason 8. Public outreach -Title 5 /Watershed permit pamphlet 9. Draft memo to DEP - Request for guidance on I/A system performance policy 10. Liaison Reports 11. Matters not reasonably anticipated by the Chair 12. Items for next agenda 13. Next meeting: February 21, 2024 14. Informational items: a. Barnstable County Responsible Management Entity Newsletter b. Monthly reports for Ocean Edge, Kings Landing, Town of Brewster (formerly CCSC) & White Rock Commons C. Dispatch newsletter d. Equity Considerations for Local Health Departments on Opioid Settlement Funds 15. Adjournment Date Posted: Date Revised: Received by Town Clerk: 2/2/2024 \\fileserverl 6\Tdocuments$\tmason\Desktop\BOH new agenda.doex GRADY CONSULTING, L.L.C. Civil Engineers ♦ Land Surveyors ♦ landscape Architects January 11, 2024 Brewster Town Hall Health Department 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 V ED JM41 til E3RF 1/\1 T t` ! I =ACTH _nD, ;F -r ; ry -NT RE: Address: Trevor Lane System 12-1 — Septic System repair Applicant- Trevor Village Condominium C/O Septic Preservation Services Dear Board Members: On behalf of the applicant we hereby submit this application for the repair of the system at the above referenced address. There are currently three existing septic systems that serve the condo units of Trevor Village. One of the three systems, System 12-1, is still in use and currently functions properly. This application is anticipatory for when the system will need repair. System 12-1 was installed in 1985 and currently serves 33 units in Trevor Village, as noted on the Septic Repair Plan page 4. There are currently 66 existing bedrooms that tie into this facility. The property is located outside a Zone II/District of Critical Planning Concern (DCPC), is serviced by municipal water, and is in the Cape Cod Bay Watershed, and therefore, does not fall under any local or state mandated nitrogen restrictions. To bring the system into Title 5 compliance, the applicant proposes to remove the existing leaching trenches, retain the existing septic tanks, and install 3 -Fuji Clean USA Model CE30 Treatment Tanks in parallel, d -box, and 1-102' long x 73.5' wide Presby Advanced Enviro Septic Wastewater Treatment system. The Fuji Clean USA Model CE30 has been proposed for additional sewage treatment prior to effluent infiltrating into the groundwater. Currently, Fuji Clean has several models approved for remedial use, but not the proposed Model CE30. Although the Fuji Clean USA Model CE30 is currently not certified, we are seeking Piloting Approval for secondary treatment. We are preparing a Piloting Application (WP61B) for this model, and depending on the review process through MassDEP, we are hoping to have Approval within the next few months. Per Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems with General Use Certification and/or Approved for Remedial Use II. (8.), the required effective leaching area of the leaching area may be reduced up to 40 percent when using the loading rates for gravity systems. 71 Evergreen Street, Suite 1 + Kingston, Mk 02364 + Tel (781) 585-2300 Enclosed please find the following: 1. 4 sets of the Septic Repair Plan, dated January 11, 2024. 2. Application for Disposal System Construction Permit. 3. Check for $900 ($60 for Major first 500 gallons, $60 for each 500 gallons after that ($60 x 14) Application Fee payable to the Town of Brewster. 4. Copy of Soil Evaluation Report. 5. Presby & Fuji Clean approval and general use letters. (WP61B Application for Fuji Clean Model CE30 treatment to be forwarded upon completion) Due to the limited area available on the property, and depths of the existing septic tanks and sewer manhole, we hereby request the Board approve the following Local Upgrade Approval Request: Local U gradeAwrovalReiluests 15.405(1)(b) -Increase in maximum allowable depth of system components to more than 36". We believe these requests can be approved without compromising the degree of environmental protection since the proposed system is a substantial improvement of the existing system. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, GRADY CONSULTING, L.L.C. Robert Carlezon, P.E. Project Engineer Cc: Septic Preservation Services 102 West Main Street Norton, MA 02766 JA2023\23-3541B0H\130H letter.docx • it ,t .. e Pi L . /j SEF�TIC INSPECTION RIEPOMT SYstr_c-\ M41 X"%TIC TAUIC y � "T�EIJC1tES \ , Depth to .Groundwater:' O o' Method of-Oetermination: v o. � W o 6. s J 11ten. tie Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of Brewster Form 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval ?� DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. Form 9A is to be submitted to the Local Board of Health for the upgrade of a failed or nonconforming septic system with a design flow of less than 10,000 gpd, where full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible. System upgrades that cannot be performed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.404 and 15.405, or in full compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 15.000, require a variance pursuant to 310 CMR 15.410 through 15.415. NOTE: Local upgrade approval shall not be granted for an upgrade proposal that includes the addition of a new design flow to a cesspool or privy, or the addition of a new design flow above the existing approved capacity of an on-site system constructed in accordance with either the 1978 Code or 310 CMR 15.000. Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. A. Facility Information 1. Facility Name and Address: Trevor Lane Condominium Name System 12-1 Trevor Lane Street Address Brewster MA 02631 _ City/Town State Zip Code 2. Owner Name and Address (if different from above): Name Street Address CitylTown State Zip Code Telephone Number 3. Type of Facility (check all that apply): ® Residential ❑ Institutional 4. Describe Facility: multi famil dwellings 5. Type of Existing System: ❑ Privy ❑ Cesspool(s) ❑ Commercial ® Conventional ❑ School ❑ Other (describe below): 6. Type of soil absorption system (trenches, chambers, leach field, pits, etc): AESPresb chambers t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 1 of 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of Brewster Form 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. A. Facility Information (continued) 7. Design Flow per 310 CMR 15.203: 60 Design flow of existing system: gpd 9p Design flow of proposed upgraded system gpd pd 7,260 Design flow of facility: gpd gpd B. Proposed Upgrade of System 1. Proposed upgrade is (check one): ® Voluntary ❑ Required by order, letter, etc. (attach copy) ❑ Required following inspection pursuant to 310 CMR 15.301. date of inspection 2. Describe the proposed upgrade to the system: Remove existing system, retain the existing septic tanks, and install 3-FujiClean USA Model CE30 Treatment Tanks in parallel, and 1-102' long x 73.5' wide Presby Advanced Enviro Septic Wastewater Treatment system. 3. Local Upgrade Approval is requested for (check all that apply): ❑ Reduction in setback(s) — describe reductions: ❑ Reduction in SAS area of up to 25%: SAS size, sq. ft. ❑ Reduction in separation between the SAS and high groundwater, Separation reduction Percolation rate Depth to groundwater ft. min./inch ft. % reduction t5form9a.doc • rev. 7106 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 2 of 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of Brewster Form 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the M information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. B. Proposed Upgrade of System ❑ Relocation of water supply well (explain): (continued) ❑ Reduction of 12 -inch separation between inlet and outlet tees and high groundwater ❑ Use of only one deep hole in proposed disposal area ❑ Use of a sieve analysis as a substitute for a perc test ❑ Other requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 that cannot be met —describe and specify sections of the Code: 15.405(1)(b) An increase in the maximum allowable depth of system components required by 310 CMR 15.221(7), from 36 inches to 72 inches below finish grade, provided that adequate venting and adequate access are provided and H-20 Loading is provided for all system components. If the proposed upgrade involves a reduction in the required separation between the bottom of the soil absorption system and the high groundwater elevation, an Approved Soil Evaluator must determine the high groundwater elevation pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(1)(h)(1). The soil evaluatormust be a member or agent of the local approving authority. High groundwater evaluation determined by, Amy von Hone September 14, 2023 Evaluator's Name (type or print) Signature Date of evaluation C. Explanation Explain why full compliance, as defined in 310 CMR 15.404(1), is not feasible. (Each section must be completed) 1. An upgraded system in full compliance with 310 CMR 15.000 is not feasible: Due to limited area and depth of existing tanks and sewer manhole 2. An alternative system approved pursuant to 310 CMR 15.283 to 15.288 is not feasible: An alternative system is proposed. t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval• Page 3 of 4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City/Town of Brewster w Form 9A - Application for Local Upgrade Approval pp p9 DEP has provided this form for use by local Boards of Health. Other forms may be used, but the information must be substantially the same as that provided here. Before using this form, check with your local Board of Health to determine the form they use. C. Explanation (continued) 3. A shared system is not feasible: This system is shared among 33 dwelling units 4. Connection to a public sewer is not feasible: Sewer is not available 5. The Application for Local Upgrade Approval must be accompanied by all of the following (check the appropriate boxes): ® Application for Disposal System Construction Permit ® Complete plans and specifications ❑ Site evaluation forms ❑ A list of abutters affected by reduced setbacks to private water supply wells or property lines. Provide proof that affected abutters have been notified pursuant to 310 CMR 15.405(2). ❑ Other (List): D. Certification "I, the facility owner, certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments, to the best of my knowledge and belief, are true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there may be significant consequences for submitting false information, including, but not limited to, penalties or fine and/or imprisonment for deliberate violations." Facility Owner's Signature Print Name Grady Consulting, LLC Name of Preparer 71 Evergreen Street, Suite 1 Preparers address MA/02364 State/ZIP Code Date 1/11/2024 Date Kin iston City/Town 781.585.2300 Telephone t5form9a.doc • rev. 7/06 Application for Local Upgrade Approval* Page 4 of 4 Page 1 of 2 Comonwealth of Massachusetts Rce,U6+er- , Massachusetts Soil Sultablifty Assessment for On-site m; a Dis,-owl Performed by: Robert Carlezon Date: 1' 9aa3 GRADY CONSULTING, L.L.C. 71 Evergreen Street, Suite 1 Kingston, MA 02364 Phone: (781) 685-2300 Fax: (781) 585-2378 Witnessed by: _ _°n'it,__— Location Address or Lot # *Owner's Name _f(Bvt( Vf� k CORjoiit'nr+�m *Address & *Telephone C/o Sepic reser+leia� �C�t+c�� yr New Construction _ Repair ✓ Title V Inspection _, Office Review Published Soil Survey Available: No Z Yes_ Year Published: Publication Scale: --_ Drainage Class: _— Soil limitations: Surficial Geology Report Available: No r/Yes Year Published: _ Publication Scale: Geologic Material (Map Unit): Landform: Flood Insurance Rate Map: Above 500 year flood boundary: _No Yes Within 500 year flood boundary No ✓ Yes Within 100 year flood boundary No= Yes Wetland Area: National Wetland Inventory Map (map unit): Wetlands Conservancy Program Map (map unit): SoH Map Unit: Current Water Resource Conditions (USGS): Month:�� Range: Above Normal Normal ` Other References Reviewed: Below Normal Depth of Naturall.. Occurrin-_ Pervious Mgterial Does at least four feet of naturally occurring pervious material exist in all areas observed throughout the area proposed for the soil absorption system? Y" If not, what is the depth of naturally occurring pervious material? Certification I certify that I am currently approved by the Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to 310 CMR 15.017 to conduct soil evaluations and that the above analysis has been performed by me consistent with the required training, expertise, and experience described in 310 CMR 15.017. I further certify that the results of my soil evaluation, as indicated on the attached soil evaluation form, are accurate and in accordance with CMR 15.100 through 15.107. / Date: 1�a3 Signature: r Y - . , TITLE 5 ON-SITE REVIEW Deep Hole # Date 0 Time ' Weather ^- Y5 Location (identify on Sit Plan)— —_ _ Land Use .5 � � a Slope(%)�_ Surface Stones R� —. Vegetation _! �5 l- Landform Distances from: Open Water Body, 4 °4 ft. Possible Wet Area 2190 ft. Drinking Water Well > th ft. Drainageway � 50� ft. Propertyline 666 ft Other _ DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth From Surface Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil ottlin Other: Structures, Stones, Inches (USD Munsell Bould s Consistenc,.%Gta](el 5aJ�`� 6rAt, tar Parent Material (geologic)_ _ G _ Depth to Bedrock. Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in Hole: Weeping fro it Face 6 ' Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater _f7.�' �ISS�f y ..1JETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Used: Depth observed standing in'observation hole: inches Depth to soil moftles:- A/A inches _ Depth to weeping from side of observation hole: Inches : Groundwater adjustment ft Index Well # Reading Date Index well level Adj.factor Adj.Groundwater level PERCOLATIONTEST Date _ j` c?A Time Observation Hole # _ Time at 9" -- Depth of Pere _ _ — _ — Time at G" _ Start Presoak _ _ Time (9"-6") — End Presoak _ Rate Minlinch Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed_ Site Failed Additional Testing Needed - Certification ��l�n Certification# Performed By— _ — - Witnessed; By N1: J Comm. aiptgirp L 6 3 /Yttttf MoG����p^ l QG� ffLAJ 1 TITLE 5 ON-SITE REVIEW Deep Hole # Date IL/Z52S IL/Z5Time �= _ Weather- Location(idenl}'. y on Site Plan) Land Use �@�'� ° __ Slope(%) D- _ Surface Stones °nl _ Vegetation Landform -- _-- Distances from: Open Water Body 140 ft. Possible Wet Area ft. Drinldng Water Well ..> /00 -ft Drainageway LD ft. Propertyline W ft Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth From Surface Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil Mottlin- Other: Structures, Stones, InchesU! SDA Munsell Boulders Con-sidgnc %Gravel a'0 I -- cr Parent Material (geologic) Depth to Groundwater: LOAM, __ S % r r�r� �� k�.&1at3 0-F La St... nvi� _ _ Depth to Bedrock Standing Water in Hole: DXk Weeping fro pit Face DIV15 Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater l DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Used: _ Depth observed standing in observation hole: inches Depth to soil mottles: Inches _ Depth to weeping from side of observation hole: inches Groundwater adjustment ft Index Well # Reading Date Index well level Adj.factor Adj.Groundwater level PERCOLATION TEST Date -_ Time_ Observation Hale 0 _ . __ Time at 9"— Depth of Perc — _, _ Time at 6" Start Presoak _ _ Time (9%6") End Presoak _ _ _ _ — — Rate Min/InchSite Suitability As essment: Site Passed Site Failed Additional Testing Needed: Performed ByD� �� [1(Il.Q3n Certification #E_ Witnessed By Comments: TITLE 5 ON-SITE REVIEW Deep Hole #. Date 2AA1213 Time 3o -Weather Ztjhf' Location(iden#ify on Site Plan) Land Use Slope(%)D—' Surface Stones_ a� Vegetation cuss P" daav s _ Landform — r Distances from: Open Water Bodv- 100 ft. Possible Wet Area > 11�:") . ft, Drinking Water Well >/W ft. Drainageway 5_ ft. Propertyline 5e- ft Other_— DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth From Surface Soil Horizon Soil Texture io LIC Soil ottlin,a Other: Structures, Stones, Inches (USD Munsell gggjdars Consistenc•. °. Gravel /r'a5]�VtJ 00k Lov �,�` "/3 -- �0o5e' G 1Jotef Afo Maf+1;,4 - J Parent Material (geologic) tAS� Depth to Bedrock —I. LL Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in Hole:: Weeping fro Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Sed: _ Depth observed standing in observation hole: inches Depth to soil mottles: inches _Depth to weeping from side of observation hole: inches • Groundwater adjustment ft Index Well # Reading Date Index well level Adj.factor Adj.Groundwater level PERCOLATION TEST Date _ _ Time Observation Hole # _ — —_ — Time at 9"— Depth of Perc _ -- _-- _ Time at 6"— Start Presoak —_ — _ Time (9"-6") _ End Presoak — Rate Minlinch _ Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site Failed Additional Testing Needed: Performed By—&L2�; (�Go A _ _ Certification # Witnessed By.+. -- Comments: TITLE 5 ON-SITE REVIEW Deep Hole # Date 2bylxo23 Time _ r �_ Weather Location(ide on Site Plan) _ Land Usefegr� on _ Slope(%) 0-3 Surface Stones Vegetation Landform _ Distances from: Open Water Body �qVO ft. Possible Wet Area ;"fob ft. Drinking Water Well�106 ft, Drainageway L DL ft. Propertyline 60% ft Other DEEP OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth From Surface Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Calor Soil Mo2LIng Other: Structures, Stones, finches) (USDA Munsell Bjo�ulderJs- Consistent- °. Gravel "� •, A Q �.iPLA. L�� r�U t/(ii 5 � -ncaA s1 b \ d(Afv 9' , U 1 Parent Material (geologic)__ _ �r%`�}" Depth to Bedrock _ Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in Hole: IVWWeepingfrom-Pit Face Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater _.`�`4, dS DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Used: _ Depth observed standing in observation hole: inches Depth to so!] mottles: inches _ Depth to weeping from side of observation hole: inches Groundwater adjustment ft Index Well # Reading Date Index well level Adj.factor Adj.Groundwater level PER OLATION TEST Observation Hole # Depth of Pere Start Presoak End Presoak Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Performed By_ ,d 0"— Witnessed By _Am, \10Ai Comments: Date _ ____ . Time Time at 9" Time at 6" Time (9"-6") Rate Min/Inch Site Failed Additional Testing Needed: Certification # TITLE 5 ON-SITE REVIEW Deep Hole # _ _ Date _ Time _ _ Weather _ Location(identify on Site Plan) Land Use _.____ _ _ Slope(%) Surface Stones Vegetation _ __ _ Landform Distances from: Open Water Body ft. Possible Wet Area — _ ft. Drinking Water Well— _ -ft. Drainageway ft Propertyline _ __ ft Other DEEP !OBSERVATION HOLE LOG Depth From Surface Soil Horizon Soil Texture Soil Color Soil _Mott in ; Other: Structures, Stones, Inches (USDA Munsell Boulders Consi enc_ °aGravel- Parent Material (geologic) _ _ Depth to Bedrock Depth to Groundwater: Standing Water in Hole:_ Weeping from Pit Face Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater _ DETERMINATION FOR SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE Method Usedi —Depth observed standing in observation hole: inches Depth to soil mottles: inches _ Depth to weeping from side of observation hole: inches Groundwater adjustment ft Index Well # Reading Date Ihdex well level Adj.factor Adj.Groundwater level PERCOLATION TEST Date _ _ Time Observation Hole # Time at 9" — Depth of Pere _ _ _ Time at 6" Start Presoak __ _ _ _ Time (9"-6") _ End Presoak _ _ _ _ Rate Min/Inch Site Suitability Assessment: Site Passed Site Failed Additional Testing Needed: Performed By._ _ — _ __. — Certification # Witnessed By._, _ _ — Comments: ElCommonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108.617-292-5500 Charles D. Baker Kathleen A. Theoharides Governor Secretary Karyn E. Polito Martin Suuberg Lieutenant Governor Commissioner MODIFIED GENERAL USE CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Title 5, 310 CMR 15.00 Name and Address of Applicant: Presby Environmental, Inc. 143 Airport Road Whitefield, NH 03598 Trade name of technology and models: Advanced Enviro-Septic® (Alternative SAS Patented Sand Filter) (hereinafter called the "System"). The Advanced Enviro-Septic Design & Installation Manual, System Installation Form and Inspection Checklist are part of this Certification. Transmittal Number: Accela - 21-CLM-000073-APP Date of Issuance: July 25, 2013, revised August 12, 2013, Modified October 30, 2019, Modified February 22, 2022. Authority for Issuance Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000, the Department of Environmental, Protection hereby issues this Certification for General Use to: Presby Environmental, Inc., 143 Airport Road, Whitefield, NH 03598 (hereinafter "the Company"), certifying the System described herein for General Use in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The sale, design, installation, and use of the System are conditioned on compliance by the Company, the Designer, the Installer and the System Owner with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Certification constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15.000. /s/ Ma R -beth Chubb _ Marybeth Chubb, Section Chief Wastewater Management Program Bureau of Resource Protection 02/22/2022 . Date This information is available in alternate format. Contact Michelle Waters-Ekanem, Director of Diversity/Civil Rights at 617-292-5751. TTY# Mass Relay Service 1-800-039-2370 MassDEP Website: wvw.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper Modified General Use Certification Page 2 of 4 Advanced Enviro-Septic (Alternative SAS) Date of Issuance: July 25, 2013, Revised August 12, 2013, Modified February 22, 2022 Accela - 21-CLM-000073-APP Technology Description The Advanced Enviro-Septic System (the `System' or `AES') is an alternative subsurface Soil Absorption System (SAS) that replaces a conventional SAS designed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000. The System consists of an 115/8 -inch diameter corrugated, high-density plastic pipe with a 9.5 -inch interior diameter and a standard length per unit of 10 feet. The pipe is perforated with eight holes equally distributed around its inner circumference at each corrugation. Each hole has a plastic skimmer extending inwards. The exterior of the pipe has ridges on the peak of each corrugation and is wrapped with three geotextile fabric materials. The inner layer is a Bio -Accelerator fabric against the bottom exterior of the plastic pipe, aligned between the 4 o'clock and 7 o'clock positions. The Bio -Accelerator fabric is covered by a thick coarse, randomly oriented polypropylene fiber mat which is wrapped completely around the pipe. An additional outer layer of a thinner non -woven geotextile polypropylene fabric is also wrapped around the pipe. Connectors designed to connect pipe units together is available and required. The System also includes sand surrounding the pipe units, specified as concrete sand meeting the ASTM C-33 specification, also called System Sand. The System Sand must be placed with a minimum thickness of (6") six inches below, (3") three inches above and (6") six inches to the sides of the AES pipe units. Conditions of Approval The term "System" refers to the Alternative Soil Absorption System in combination with the other components of an on-site treatment and disposal system that may be required to serve a facility in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000. The term "Approval" refers to the technology -specific Special Conditions, the Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems found here: hfts://www.mass.stov/doc/standard-conditions-for-alternative-soil-absorption-systems-with- 2,eneral-use-certification/download, the General Conditions for Use of Alternative Systems of 310 CMR 15.287, and any Attachments. For Alternative Soil Absorption Systems that have been issued General Use Certification for the installation of Systems to serve facilities where the site meets the requirements for new construction, the Department authorizes reductions in the effective leaching area (3 10 CMR 15.242), subject to the Standard Conditions that apply to all Alternative Soil Absorption Systems with General Use Certification and subject to the Special Conditions below applicable to this Technology. Special Conditions The System is approved as an Alternative Soil Absorption System Patented Sand Filter providing Treatment with Disposal and is categorized as such by the Title 5 I/A Program. In addition to the Special Conditions contained in this Approval, the System shall comply with Modified General Use Certification Page 3 of 4 Advanced Enviro-Septic (Alternative SAS) Date of Issuance: July 25, 2013, Revised August 12, 2013, Modified February 22, 2022 Accela - 2 1 -CLM-000073-APP all Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems, except where stated otherwise in these Special Conditions. 2. The System is approved for facilities where a conventional system with a reserve area exists or can be built on-site in full compliance with the new construction requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 and has been approved by the local approving authority. 3. This Certification shall not be used for the installation of a System to upgrade or replace an existing failed or nonconforming system, unless the facility meets the siting requirements for new construction, including a reserve area. 4. The separation distance to the estimated seasonal high groundwater elevation shall be measured from the bottom of the System sand below the Advanced Enviro-Septic System. 5. The System shall only be installed in bed or field configuration, as described in 310 CMR 15.252. The System shall not be installed in trench configuration and no sidewall area shall be considered in the total effective leaching area provided. The effective leaching area shall be the bottom area only (length times width) of the sand bed. 6. System does not require a five foot over dig as indicated at 310 CMR 15.255(5). 7. Systems shall be installed with differential venting for aeration and inspection access at end of each run of pipe, section or serial bed and whenever the System is installed under impervious surfaces. 8. Serial distribution laterals shall be limited to no more than 500 gpd with each lateral a maximum of 100 feet, and must be laid level. Multi-level systems shall not be allowed. 9. The Advanced Enviro-Septic proprietary product (AES) will be sized at a minimum of seventy (70) linear feet per bedroom (lf/br) and will not exceed 100 feet in length. 10. System component material specifications for the pipe, plastic components, fabric and sand shall comply with the specifications identified in the initial Enviro-Septic UA technology approval. The specification and use of the additional Bio -Accelerator layer must maintain the same material specification as was installed with the completed testing conducted by NSF, BNQ and Massachusetts On -Site System Test Center. Prior approval from the Department for any change from these specifications shall be requested in writing. 11. Any changes to the approved plans must receive Local Approving Authority (LAA) approval prior to any changes. Before a Certificate of Compliance can be issued by the LAA the System Designer must include any changes to the approved plan into the as -built plans. 12. Design, installation and operation shall be in strict conformance with the Company's DEP approved plans and specifications of Enviro-Septic Wastewater Treatment System Modified General Use Certification Page 4 of 4 Advanced Enviro-Septic (Alternative SAS) Date of Issuance: July 25, 2013, Revised August 12, 2013, Modified February 22, 2022 Accela - 21-CLM-000073-APP Massachusetts Design and Installation Manuals Copyright September 2019, Presby Environmental, Inc., 310 CMR 15.000 and this Approval. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energ4 & Environmental Affairs LtDepartment of Environmental Protection One Winter Strout Boston, MA 02108- * 6'17--'2'92-5500 Charles D. Baker Matthew A. Beaton Governor Secretary Karyn E. Polito Martin Suuberg Lieutenant Governor Commissioner Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems with General Use Certification and/or Approved for Remedial Use Revised: March 5, 2018 These Standard Conditions apply to Alternative Soil Absorption System (Alt. SAS) technologies for disposal -only as well as for technologies providing both treatment and disposal. Currently these approved alternative technologies include the following, Alt. SAS Disposal -Only, • Contactor, Field Drain Contactor, and Recharger Chambers, by Cultec, Inc. • Biodiffuser &ARC Chambers, by Infiltrator Systems, Inc. • Infiltrator Chambers, by Infiltrator Systems, Inc. • Eljen Mantis M5, by E1jen Corp. Alt. SAS Treatment with Disposal - Patented Sand Filters, • Eljen GSF Geotextile Sand Filter System, by Eljen Corp. • Enviro-Septic Wastewater Treatment System, by Presby Environmental, Inc. • Advanced Enviro-Septic System, by Presby Environmental, Inc. • Simple -Septic Wastewater Treatment System, by Presby Environmental, Inc. • Infiltrator ATL system, by Infiltrator Systems, Inc. • GeoMat Leaching System, by Geomatrix Systems, LLC. An alternative SAS may be appropriate for new construction, increases in flow, or for the upgrade of an existing failing, failed, or nonconforming system where reducing the disturbance of the site is desired. Alternative Dis:�osal-Onik technoloo ies approved by the Department may be substituted for conventional SAS's allowed under Title 5. The alternative Chamber technologies, when compared to conventional Title 5 chambers, provide options from some of the Title 5 requirements such as offering plastic instead of concrete chambers and eliminating the need for stone aggregate around the chamber while allowing higher loading rates and reduced effective leaching area. Other options include Chambers installed with aggregate meeting the requirements of Title 5, however Alternative Chambers used with aggregate are not allowed higher loading rates which must remain the same as required by Title 5 for conventional chambers with aggregate. In addition to alternative Chambers, This information is available in alternate format. Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem, Diversity Director, at 617.292.5751. TTY# MassRelay Service 1-800-439.2370 MassDEP Website: www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 2 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 disposal -only approved Alt. SAS technologies also include the Mantis M5 pipe and sand System design. Alternative Treatment with Disposal technolo ' es approved by the Department refer to alternative leaching systems that have demonstrated higher removal of organics and suspended matter prior to the percolation of wastewater into underlying unsaturated pervious soils when compared to conventional leaching systems. Higher loading rates are allowed than would be permissible with a conventional design and additional relief from other design standards is permissible for upgrades. A System approved under these Standard Conditions consists of a septic tank conforming to the requirements of Title 5, either conventional or UA approved, followed by the Alt. SAS which may provide for a reduced effective leaching area. The use of an approved Alt. SAS, subject to these Standard Conditions, requires among other things: • A Disclosure Notice in the Deed to the property for installed Systems according to the following: • when installing an Alt. SAS Disposal -Only System (chambers or Eljen Mantis M5) a Disclosure Notice in the Deed to the property is not required; • when installing an Alt. SAS Treatment with Disposal -Patented Sand Filters System under the General Use Certificate a Disclosure Notice in the Deed to the property is not required; • when installing an Alt. SAS Treatment with Disposal -Patented Sand Filters System under the Approval for Remedial Use a Disclosure Notice in the Deed to the property is required in accordance with 310 CMR 287(10); • Certifications by the Designer and the Installer (3 10 CMR 15.021(3)); • Notification within 24 hours by the System Owner to the Local Approving Authority (LAA) of any System failure; • When System requires pumping prior to the SAS, 24-hour emergency wastewater storage capacity above the elevation of the high level alarm; • System Owner Acknowledgement of Responsibilities, in accordance with these standard conditions and the Technology Approval's Special Conditions. This Approval does not address the use of the following alternative SAS's, which are covered under separate Title 5 UA Program Approvals: a) Drip Dispersal Systems b) Bottomless Sand Filters Defmitions and References The term "System" refers to the approved technology in combination with the other components of an on-site treatment and disposal system that may be required to serve a facility in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000. Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 3 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 The term "Approval" or "Certification" refers to these Standard Conditions; the Special Conditions contained in the Technology Approval, the General Conditions of 310 CMR 15.287, and any Attachments. The phrase "new construction" always refers to construction of a new facility or any increase in actual or design flow to any existing system above the approved capacity. The phrase "upgrade of a system" or the term "upgrade" or the term "remedial site" refers to any repair, modification, or replacement of a whole system or a component of an existing failing, failed or nonconforming system where there is no increase in the actual or design flow to the system. The Conditions contained herein MUST be read in conjunction with any Special Conditions that are technology -specific. I. Purpose 1. These Standard Conditions shall apply to all Alt. SAS technologies identified in a General Use Certification or a Remedial Use Approval as either a Disposal -Only technology or a Treatment with Disposal technology as listed above. In addition to the Special Conditions contained in the technology -specific Approvals, the System shall comply with all these "Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems", except where stated otherwise in the Special Conditions. 2. The sale, design, installation, and use of the System shall be subject to these requirements for all systems that submit a complete Disposal System Construction Permit (DSCP) application after the effective date of these Standard Conditions. Existing systems and systems for which a complete DSCP application was submitted prior to the effective date of these requirements shall not be subject to the design and installation requirements, however, the System Owner, the Service Contractor, and the Company shall be subject to all other requirements contained herein. 3. With the other applicable permits or approvals that may be required by Title 5, the Approval authorizes the installation and use of the System in Massachusetts. All the provisions of Title 5, including the General Conditions for Alternative Systems (3 10 CMR 15.287), apply to the sale, design, installation, and use of the System, except those provisions that specifically have been varied by this Approval. 4. Provided that the Local Approving Authority (LAA) approves the System in conformance with the Department's Approval for the System, Department review and approval of the site-specific System design and installation is not required unless the Department determines on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to its authority at 310 CMR 15.003(2)(e), that the proposed System requires Department review and approval. II. Design and Installation Requirements Where any contradiction may exist in design standards between the Company guidance and the requirements of Title 5 or this Approval, the design shall meet the Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 4 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 standards of Title 5 and this Approval unless the Company guidance is more stringent. 2. In accordance with 310 CMR 15.240(6), absorption trenches should be used whenever possible. Accordingly, approved Disposal -Only and Treatment with Disposal Alt. SAS Systems shall be used in trench configuration whenever possible, unless a different configuration is allowed by the Approval(s) Special Conditions. 3. The Alternative System shall include a properly sized and constructed septic tank, designed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.223-15.229 or approved as an Alternative technology per 15.280-15.288, connected to the building sewer and followed in series by the approved Alternative Soil Absorption System. A 1,000 gallon septic tank may be allowed in accordance with the provisions of 310 CMR 15.404(3)(a). 4. The Alternative System shall be installed in a manner which does not intrude on, replace, or adversely affect the operation of any other component of the subsurface sewage disposal system. 5. The Designer shall be a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer or a Massachusetts Registered Sanitarian, including when designing systems for repair, provided that such Sanitarian shall not design a system with a discharge greater than 2,000 gallons per day. 6. For new construction or increases in flow, the System shall be subject to the following: a) The System may only be installed in soils with a percolation rate of up to 60 minutes per inch (MPI); b) A site evaluation, in compliance with 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.107, must be approved by the Approving Authority and the site must meet the siting requirements for new construction; c) The record drawings, approved by the LAA, must clearly indicate an area for a full- sized conventional primary SAS and a full-sized conventional reserve area that are for the sole purpose of on-site sewage disposal; d) Where the System has reduced the effective leaching area, as allowed by the Standard Conditions, the installation shall not disturb the site in any manner that would preclude the future installation of the conventional full-sized primary SAS without encroaching on the reserve area; and e) Except for the installed SAS, the System Owner shall not construct any permanent buildings or structures or disturb the site in any manner that would encroach on the area approved for a full-sized conventional primary SAS or the area approved for a full-sized conventional reserve SAS. 7. For the u ade f a stem, the installation of the proposed System shall be subject to the following: a) The System may only be installed in soils with a percolation rate of up to 90 minutes per inch (MPI); Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 5 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 b) Prior to approving the installation of the System, the LAA must determine there is no increase in the actual or proposed design flow; c) Prior to Local Approval of the System, the Designer shall show on the plans the maximum available area for a conventional system (without reserve) designed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255. d) The proposed System must include the approval by the LAA for the upgrade or replacement of all other existing components, as necessary, to comply with the standards of Maximum Feasible Compliance (MFC) of 310 CMR 15.404; e) The record drawings, approved by the LAA, must clearly indicate an area for the best feasible replacement system that could be installed in the event that the proposed Alternative Soil Absorption System fails or it is determined that it is not capable of providing equivalent environmental protection; f) When evaluating the best feasible replacement system that could be installed in the event that the proposed Alternative Soil Absorption System fails or it is determined that it is not capable of providing equivalent environmental protection, the Designer shall consider these options in the following order: i. a conventional system designed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255 that can be built feasibly, with the exception of providing a reserve area (15.248); ii. a conventional system that can only be built feasibly under a Local Upgrade Approval (LUA); iii. where a conventional system cannot be built feasibly under a LUA, a Bottomless Sand Filter, in conjunction with a Secondary Treatment Unit; iv. where a System can only be built feasibly with variances, a System that has been demonstrated to vary the design requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 to the least degree necessary and have the least effect on public health, safety, welfare and the environment (the System may be an Alternative System with variances); or v. a tight tank. g) The installation of the proposed System shall not disturb the site in any manner that would preclude the future installation of the best feasible replacement system that could be installed to replace the proposed System. Components of the proposed System may be sited in an area for the future installation of the best feasible replacement system, provided that it does not render the area unusable for a potential future replacement system; and h) Except for the installed SAS, the System Owner shall not construct any permanent buildings or structures in the area for the best feasible replacement system that could be installed to replace the proposed System and the System Owner shall not disturb the site in any other manner that would preclude the future installation of the best feasible replacement system. 8. Alternative Desig!i Standard to 310 CMR 15.242(11tal Effluent Loading Ratp, Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 6 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 For new construction or increases in flowT the required effective leaching area may be reduced up to 40 percent when using the loading rates for gravity systems of 310 CMR 15.242(1)(a), provided: a) no variance is granted for a reduction in depth to groundwater; b) no variance is granted for a reduced depth of pervious material; and c) a minimum of 400 square feet of effective leaching area shall be installed if any proposed reduction in the leaching area would result in less than 400 square feet of effective leaching area; (Facilities with small flows that would not require 400 sq.ft. of effective leaching area, when designed in accordance with Title 5, may be built with less than 400 sq. ft. provided that no reduction in effective leaching area is taken). 9. Alternative Desigg Standard to 310 CMR 15.242(1){a) and 15.245(4)_ Effluent Loadin& Rates For the upSsade of a aystem,, the System shall be subject to the following: g) For soils with a percolation rate of 60 minutes or less per inch, the size of the SAS may be sized with 40 percent less effective leaching area than required when using the loading rates for gravity systems of 310 CMR 15.242(1)(a); h) For soils with a percolation rate of between 60 and 90 minutes per inch, the size of the SAS may be sized with 40 percent less effective leaching area than required when using the loading rate of 0.15 gpd/square foot as specified by 310 CMR 15.245(4); i) Unless allowed under the Special Conditions for the Technology, no additional reduction in the effective leaching area is allowed under an LUA or a variance that would result in a reduction greater than 40% of that which would be required under 310 CMR 15.242(1)(a) and 15.245(4), respectively. Any other deviations to design standards, except the effective leaching area, may be granted under LUA or a variance; and j) A minimum of 400 square feet of effective leaching area shall be provided if any proposed reduction in the leaching area would result in less than 400 square feet of effective leaching area. Where 400 square feet of effective leaching is not feasible, the greatest effective leaching area shall be installed provided that no more than a 40 percent reduction is taken. 10. Specific Conditions for Treatment with Disposal Alt. SAS Technologies a) The use of aggregate as specified in 310 CMR 15.247 is not allowed with Patented Sand Filters. b) Unless determined necessary by the Designer or Company, the System shall not be used with pressure distribution for any design flow. When installed for a facility with a design flow of 2,000 gpd or greater, approved Patented Sand Filter Systems are exempt from the requirement for pressure distribution under 310 CMR 15.231. Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 7 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 c) Patented Sand Filters shall not be installed in a Nitrogen Sensitive Area (NSA) to serve facilities with actual or design flows of 2,000 GPD or greater since those facilities require installation of a Recirculating Sand Filter (RSF) or equivalent technology. Patented Sand Filters may be installed as a disposal -only alternative technology when used in addition to an approved Secondary Treatment Unit (reduction of BOD/TSS). When a Patented Sand Filter is used in this type of septic system design, only the reductions permitted in the Secondary Treatment Unit's (STU) alternative technology approval, such as a reduction in SAS size, depth of naturally occurring pervious material or depth to groundwater, are allowed. d) For upgrades only, a reduction in the depth to groundwater and/or a reduction in the pervious material may be taken in accordance with Section H, paragraph 5 of the Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use. In no case, shall the reductions allowed under the Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units be combined with any reduction provided by this Approval, the alternative technology's Remedial Use Approval Special Conditions or with any reduction that may be allowed under the procedures of Local Upgrade Approval or variance procedures of 310 CMR 15.401-415. 11. Specific Conditions for Dis osal-Onl Alt. SAS Technologies a) In a NSA, as defined in 310 CMR 15.215, Alternative Systems serving facilities with actual or design flows of 2,000 GPD or greater must include treatment with a RSF or equivalent technology, as required by 310 CMR 15.202(1). Under this Approval, Disposal -Only Alt. SAS technologies shall not be installed in an NSA to serve facilities with actual or design flows of 2,000 GPD or greater unless installed in conjunction with a RSF or equivalent technology. b) For new construction or ungrades, a reduction in the effective leaching area may be taken in accordance with the conditions and limitations imposed by the approval of the Secondary Treatment Unit employed. (approved Alternative Chambers may be installed with or without aggregate for the disposal of effluent from an approved Secondary Treatment Unit, see paragraph I I (e) below.) For upgrades only, a reduction in the depth to groundwater and/or a reduction in the pervious material may be taken in accordance with the conditions and limitations imposed by the Remedial Use Approval of the Secondary Treatment Unit employed. In no case, shall the reductions allowed under the Secondary Treatment Unit approval be made less stringent. In no case, shall the reductions allowed under the Secondary Treatment Unit approval be combined with any reduction provided by this Approval or combined with any reduction that may be allowed under the procedures of Local Upgrade Approval or the variance procedures of 310 CMR 15.401-415. c) For the upgrade of a system, installations without secondary treatment are entitled to reductions in depth to groundwater or depth of naturally occurring pervious material only to the limits that may be allowed by the LAA under the procedures of Local Upgrade Approval or the variance procedures of 310 CMR 15.401-415. d) The use of aggregate as specified in Title 5, 310 CMR 15.247 is not required. Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 8 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 Chambers Specific Standard Conditions, e) The installation of approved Alternative Chambers with aggregate is allowed provided that it complies with the aggregate requirements of 310 CMR 15.247. However, when approved Alternative Chambers are installed with aggregate the reduction in effective leaching area provided by Standard Conditions II (8) and (9) is not allowed. Only when upgrading a system, approved Alternative Chambers installed with aggregate may be allowed a reduction in effective leaching area (up to 25%) under the limitations and procedures of a Local Upgrade Approval (3 10 CMR 15.401-405). f) Effluent pressure distribution shall be provided for actual or design flows of 2,000 gpd or greater and shall be designed in accordance with Department guidance. The effluent loading rates provided in 310 CMR 15.242(1)(b) for pressure distribution may be utilized, but no reduction in the effective leaching area as may be provided under this Approval may be taken when using the loading rates for pressure distribution, as stated in the regulation. 12. All System control units, valve boxes, distribution piping, conveyance lines and other System appurtenances shall be designed and installed to prevent freezing. 13. When pumping is required to a distribution box or to a SAS pressure distribution tank, the System pump chambers/tanks shall be equipped with sensors and high-level alarms to protect against high water due to pump failure, pump control failure, loss of power, system freeze ups, backups, etc. Emergency storage shall be provided when pumping to discharge is employed, including but not limited to, pressure distribution. Emergency storage capacity for wastewater above the high level alarm shall be provided equal to the daily design flow of the System including an additional allowance for the volume of all drainage which may flow back into the System when pumping has ceased. 14. System control panel(s) including alarms and controls shall be mounted in a location always accessible to the operator (Service Contractor). Any System malfunction and high water alarms shall be readily visible and audible for the facility occupants and the Service Contractor and shall be connected to circuits separate from the circuits serving the operating equipment and pumps. 15. The System shall not include any relief valve or outlet for the discharge of wastewater to prevent flooding of the system, back up or break out. 16. Any System structures with exterior piping connections located within 12 inches of or lower than the Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater elevation shall have the connections made watertight with neoprene seals or equivalent. 17. In compliance with 310 CMR 15.240(13), a minimum of one (1) inspection port shall be provided within the SAS consisting of perforated four inch pipe placed vertically down to the elevation of the SAS interface with the underlying unsaturated pervious Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 9 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 soils to enable monitoring for ponding. The pipe shall be capped with a screw type cap and accessible to within three inches of finish grade. (A locking cap at -grade is preferred) Facilities with multiple SAS's shall have an inspection port in each. 18. Upon submission of an application for a Disposal System Construction Permit (DSCP), the Designer shall provide to the Local Approving Authority: a) proof that the Designer has satisfactorily completed any required training by the Company for the design and installation of the Technology; b) certification of the design by the Company for any residential system with a design of 2,000 gpd or more or for any proposed non-residential system or if required by the Special Conditions for an approved Technology; c) certification by the Designer that the design conforms to the Approval, any Company Design Guidance, and 310 CMR 15.000; and d) a certification, signed by the Owner of record for the property to be served by the Technology, stating that the property Owner: i. has been provided a copy of the Title 5 UA technology Approval, the Owner's Manual, and the Operation and Maintenance Manual, and the Owner agrees to comply with all terms and conditions; ii. for Systems installed under a Remedial Use Approval, the owner agrees to fulfill his responsibilities to provide written notification of the Approval to any new Owner, as required by 310 CMR 15.287(5); iii. if the design does not provide for the use of garbage grinders, the restriction is understood and accepted; and iv. whether or not covered by a warranty, the System Owner understands the requirement to repair, replace, modify or take any other action as required by the Department or the LAA, if the Department or the LAA determines the System to be failing to protect public health and safety and the environment, as defined in 310 CMR 15.303. 19. The System Owner and the Designer shall not submit to the LAA a DSCP application for the use of a Technology under this Approval if the Approval has been revised, reissued, suspended, or revoked by the Department prior to the date of application. The Approval continues in effect until the Department revises, reissues, suspends, or revokes the Approval. 20. The System Owner shall not authorize or allow the installation of the System other than by a locally approved Installer and, if required by the Company, a person certified or trained by the Company to install the System. 21. Prior to the commencement of construction, the System Installer must certify in writing to the Designer, the LAA, and the System Owner that (s)he is a locally approved System Installer and, if required by the Company, is certified by or has received appropriate training by the Company. Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 10 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 22. The Installer shall maintain on-site, at all times during construction, a copy of the approved plans, the Owner's manual, the O&M manual, and a copy of the Approval. 23. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance the following shall be provided: a) the System Installer and Designer must provide certification in writing to the LAA that the System has been constructed in compliance with the terms of the Approval; and b) For System 1=ades installed under a Remedial Use Awroval the System Owner shall provide a copy of record and/or register the Deed Notice required by 310 CMR 15.287(l 0), to the LAA. The Deed Notice shall be completed as follows: i. a certified Registry copy of the Deed Notice bearing the book and page/or document number; and ii. if the property is unregistered land, a copy of the System Owner's deed to the property as recorded at the Registry, bearing a marginal reference on the System Owner's deed to the property. The Notice to be recorded shall be in the form of the Notice provided by the Department. 24. The Department has not determined that the performance of the System will provide a level of protection to public health and safety and the environment that is at least equivalent to that of a sanitary sewer system. a) If it is feasible to connect a new or existing facility to the sewer, the Designer shall not propose an Alternative System to serve the facility and the facility Owner shall not install or use an Alternative System; and b) When a sanitary sewer connection becomes feasible after an Alternative System has been installed, the System Owner shall connect the facility served by the System to the sewer within 60 days of such feasibility and the System shall be abandoned in compliance with current Code requirements, unless a later time is allowed in writing by the Department or the LAA. III. Operation and Maintenance For Systems with design flows of 2,000 gpd or greater where the effective leaching area installed is less than 75% of that required by Title 5 (3 10 CMR 15.240(4)), measurement of the depth of ponding within the SAS above the interface with the underlying unsaturated pervious soils shall be performed once per year by means of the inspection port(s) and any other available access to the distribution system. Inspector must be an Approved System Inspector. 2. Whenever an Alt. SAS system's inspection port ponding depth is measured and indicates the ponding level within the SAS is above the invert of the distribution system, an additional measurement shall be made 30 days later. If the subsequent reading indicates the elevation of ponding within the SAS is above the invert of the distribution system, the System Owner shall be responsible for the submittal to the Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 11 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 LAA within 60 days of the follow-up inspection, a written evaluation of the System with recommendations for changes in the design, operation, and/or maintenance. The written evaluation with recommendations shall be prepared by a Designer and the submission shall include all monitoring data and inspection reports for the previous 3 years. Recommendations shall be implemented, as approved by the LAA, in accordance with an approved schedule, provided that all corrective measures are implemented consistent with the limitations described in Paragraph IVA. 3. For Systems less than 2,000 gpd or facilities where the effective leaching area installed meets the requirements of Title 5, the System shall not be required to be inspected at any greater frequency than would be required if the facility was served by a conventional system, unless the LAA, Company, or Designer requires more frequent inspection. 4. If at any time a septic system with an Alt. SAS is inspected by a System Inspector, the following shall be recorded, at a minimum: a) date, time, air temperature, and weather conditions; b) observations for objectionable odors; c) observations for signs of breakout of sanitary sewage in the vicinity of the Alternative System; d) depth of ponding within the SAS; e) identification of any apparent violations of the Approval; f) since the last inspection, whether the system had been pumped with date(s) and volume(s) pumped; g) sludge depth and scum layer thickness, if measured; h) when responding to alarm events, the cause of the alarm and any steps taken to address the alarm and to prevent or reduce the likelihood of future similar alarm events; i) field testing results when performed as part of the site visit; j) samples taken for laboratory analysis and results of previous samples, if any k) any cleaning and lubrication performed; 1) any adjustments of control settings, as recommended or deemed necessary; m) any testing of pumps, switches, alarms, as recommended or deemed necessary; n) identification of any equipment failure or components not functioning as designed; o) parts replacements and reason for replacement, whether routine or for repair; and p) further corrective actions recommended, if any. 5. The System Owner shall maintain copies of any service records or inspection reports and all reports and notifications to the LAA for a minimum of three years. Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 12 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 6. Unless directed by the LAA to take other action, the System Owner shall immediately cease discharges or have wastewater hauled off-site, if at any time during the operation of the Alternative System the system is in failure as described in 310 CMR 15.303(1)(a), items 1 or 2 (sewage backing up into facilities or breaking out to the surface). N. Additional System Owner Requirements For System upgrades installed under Remedial Use Approval, prior to signing any agreement to transfer any or all interest in the property served by the System, or any portion of the property, including any possessory interest, the System Owner shall provide written notice, as required by 310 CMR 15.287(5), of all conditions contained in the Approval to the transferee(s). Any and all instruments of transfer and any leases or rental agreements shall include as an exhibit attached thereto and made a part of thereof a copy of the Approval for the System. The System Owner shall send a copy of such written notification(s) to the LAA within 10 days of giving such notice to the transferee(s). 2. The System Owner shall not install, modify, upgrade, or replace the System except in accordance with a valid DSCP issued by the LAA which covers the proposed work. 3. Upon determining that the System is failing to protect public health and safety and the environment, as defined in 310 CMR 15.303, the System Owner shall be responsible for the notification of the LAA within 24 hours of such determination. 4. In the case of a System that has been determined to be failing to protect public health and safety and the environment, an equipment failure, alarm event, components not functioning as designed, components not functioning in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, or violations of the Approval, the System Owner shall provide written notification within five days, describing corrective measures to the local board of health and the Company and may only propose or take corrective measures provided that: a) all emergency repairs, including pumping, shall be in accordance with the limitations and permitting requirements of 310 CMR 15.353; b) the design of any repairs or upgrades are consistent with the System Approval; c) the design of any repairs or upgrades requiring a DSCP shall be performed by a Designer who is a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer or a Massachusetts Registered Sanitarian, provided that such Sanitarian shall not design a system with a discharge greater than 2,000 gallons per day. d) the installation of any repairs or upgrades requiring a DSCP shall be done by an Installer with a currently valid Disposal System Installers Permit and, if training is required, the Installer shall be certified by the Company as qualified to install the System. To determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, or suspending the Approval or to determine whether the conditions of the Approval have been met, the Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 13 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 System Owner shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 6. The Approval shall be binding on the System Owner and on its agents, contractors, successors, and assigns, including but not limited to the Designer, Installer, and Service Contractor. Violation of the terms and conditions of the Approval by any of the foregoing persons or entities, respectively, shall constitute violation of the Approval by the System Owner unless the Department determines otherwise. V. Company Requirements 1, The Approval shall only apply to the model unit(s) with the same model designation(s) specified in the System Approval and meet the same specifications, operating requirements, and plans, as provided by the Company or its authorized agent at the time of the application. Any proposed modifications of the unit(s), installation requirements, or operating requirements shall be subject to the review of the Department for inclusion under a modification of the Approval. The Designer shall be responsible for the selection of the appropriate model unit(s) as applicable. The Company shall be responsible for verification of the appropriate model unit(s) as part of any review of proposed installations that may be required by Paragraph V.3 of these Standard Conditions or the Special Conditions in the Approval. 2. Prior to submission of an application for a DSCP, the Company or its authorized agent shall provide to the Designer and the System Owner: a) All design and installation specifications and requirements; b) An owner's manual and, if alarms are provided, including response procedures; c) A copy of the Company's warranty; and d) If training or certification is required by the Company, lists of qualified Designers, Installers, and Service Contractors. 3. Prior to the submission of an application for a DSCP, for all nonresidential Systems and any System with a design flow of 2,000 gpd or greater, the Company shall submit to the Designer and the System Owner, a certification by the Company or its authorized agent that the design conforms to the Approval and all Company requirements and that the proposed use of the System is consistent with the Technology's capabilities. The authorized agent of the Company responsible for the design review shall have received technical training in the Company's products. 4. If the Company requires trained or certified Designers, Installers, or Service Contractors, the Company or its authorized agent shall make available programs of training and continuing education, as necessary. The Company or its authorized agent shall maintain, annually update, and make available by February 15th of each year, lists of trained or certified Designers, Installers, and Service Contractors. If training or certification is required, the Company shall not sell the Technology to an Installer unless the Installer is trained or certified to install the System by the Company. Similarly, if training is required, the Company shall ensure distributors Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 14 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 and resellers of the Technology shall not sell the Technology to an Installer unless the Installer is trained or certified to install the System by the Company. 5. As part of any training programs for Designers, Installers, or Service Contractors, the Company or its authorized agent shall provide each trainee with a copy of this Approval with the design, installation, O&M, and owner's manuals that were submitted as part of the Approval. 6. The Company shall provide, in printed or electronic format, the System design, installation, O&M, and Owner's manuals, and any updates associated with this System Approval, to the System Owners, Designers, Installers, Service Contractors, vendors, resellers, and distributors of the System. Prior to publication or distribution in Massachusetts, the Company shall submit to the Department for review a copy of any proposed changes to the manual(s) with reasons for each change, at least 30 days prior to issuance. The Company shall request Department approval for any substantive changes which may require a modification of the Approval. 7. Prior to its sale of any System that may be used in Massachusetts, the Company shall provide the purchaser with a copy of this Approval with the System design, installation, O&M, and Owner's manuals. In any contract for distribution or sale of the System, the Company shall require the distributor or seller to provide the purchaser of a System for use in Massachusetts with copies of these documents, prior to any sale of the System. 8. To determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, or suspending the Approval or to determine whether the conditions of the Approval have been met, the Company shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the Technology within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 9. Within 60 days of issuance by the Department of these Conditions and any other revisions to the Approval, the Company shall provide written notification of changes to the Approval to all distributors and resellers of the System. 10. The Company shall provide written notification to the Department's Director of the Wastewater Management Program at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer of ownership of the technology for which this Approval is issued. Said notification shall include the name and address of the proposed owner containing a specific date of transfer of ownership, responsibility, coverage and liability between them. All provisions of this Approval applicable to the Company shall be applicable to successors and assigns of the Company, unless the Department determines otherwise. 11. The Company shall maintain copies of: a) the Approval; b) the installation manual specifically detailing procedures for installation of its System; Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 15 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 c) an owner's manual and, if alarms are required, including alarm response procedures; d) a copy of the Company's warranty; and e) if training or certification is required, lists of qualified Designers and Installers. 12. The Company shall maintain the following additional information for `Treatment with Disposal' Systems installed in Massachusetts, and make it available to the Department within 30 days of a request by the Department: a) the address of each facility where the System was installed, the Owner's name and mailing address (if different), the type of use (e.g. residential, commercial, institutional, etc.), the design flow, the model installed; and b) the installation date, start-up date, current operational status. 13. The Approval shall be binding on the Company and its officers, employees, agents, contractors, successors, and assigns, including but not limited to dealers, distributors, and resellers. Violation of the terms and conditions of the Approval by any of the foregoing persons or entities, respectively, shall constitute violation of the Approval by the Company unless the Department determines otherwise. VI. General Requirements 1. Any System for which a complete Disposal System Construction Permit ("DSCP") Application is submitted while the Approval is in effect, may be permitted, installed, and used in accordance with the Approval, unless and until: a) the Department issues modifications or amendments to the Approval which specifically affect the installation or use of a System installed under the Approval for the System; or b) the Department, the local approval authority, or a court requires the System to be modified or removed or requires discharges to the System to cease. 2. All notices and documents required to be submitted to the Department by the Approval shall be submitted to: Director Wastewater Management Program Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street - 5th floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 3. The Department may suspend, modify or revoke the Approval for cause, including, but not limited to, non-compliance with the terms of the Approval, for obtaining the Approval by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts or any change in or discovery of conditions that would constitute grounds for discontinuance of the Approval, or as necessary for the protection of public health, safety, welfare or the environment, and as authorized by applicable law. The Department reserves its Standard Conditions for Alternative Soil Absorption Systems Page 16 of 16 General Use and Remedial Use Approvals Last revised March 5, 2018 rights to take any enforcement action authorized by law with respect to the Approval and/or the System against the Company, a System Owner, a Designer, an Installer, and/or Service Contractor. MassDEP �i'A Charles D. Baker Governor Karyn E. Polito Lieutenant Governor Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental ;affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108.617-292-5500 APPROVAL FOR REMEDIAL USE Pursuant to Title 5, 310 CMR 15.00 Name and Address of Applicant: Fuji Clean USA, LLC 41-2 Greenwood Road Brunswick, ME 04011 Trade name of technology and models: Matthew A. Beaton Secretary Martin Suuberg Commissioner Fuji Clean USA, models CE5, CE7, CE 10 (hereinafter called the `System'). Schematic drawings of the models and the manuals for Design, Installation, O&M and Owner and a technology inspection checklist are part of this Approval. Transmittal Number: X264853 Date of Issuance: November 3, 2015 Authority for Issuance Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000, the Department of Environmental, Protection hereby issues this Approval for Remedial Use to: Fuji Clean USA, LLC, 41-2 Greenwood Road, Brunswick, ME 04011 (hereinafter "the Company"), approving the System described herein for Remedial Use in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The sale, design, installation, and use of the System are conditioned on compliance by the Company, the Designer, the Installer, the Service Contractor, and the System Owner with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Approval constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15.000. Marybeth Chubb, Acting Director Wastewater Management Program Bureau of Water Resources November 3 2015 Date This information is available in alternate format. Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem, Diversity Director, at 517-292-5751. TTY# MassRelay Service 1-800-439-2370 MassDEP Website: www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper Fuji Clean USA Models CES, CE7, CE 10 Approval for Remedial Use Date: November 3, 2015 Technology Description Page 2 of 3 The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU) that includes a circuitous flow train through a primary sedimentation chamber, anaerobic treatment chamber, and aerobic contact/ filtration chamber all within the treatment tank. Fuji Clean USA, models CES CE7 CE 10 Wastewater flows into the sedimentation chamber (Chamber 1) where the solids and greases are separated from the wastewater by gravity. The effluent flows into the Anaearobic Contact Filtration Chamber (Chamber 2) where spherical -skeleton filter media aid fixed film and suspended -growth anaerobic micro-organisms to decompose organic matter. The wastewater then flows into the Aerobic Contact Filtration Chamber (Chamber 3) where waved board media and cylindrical hollow mesh media provide a large surface area for fixed -film aerobic bacteria growth and digestion of organic matter as well as filtration of the wastewater. Chamber 3 also provides for settling of sludge prior to discharge. Two air-lift pumps, each powered by a single linear diaphragm blower, provide air to the aerobic chamber as well as flow recirculation and equalization. Sludge generated in Chamber 3 is recirculated to the Sedimentation Chamber and discharge of treated wastewater is through an overflow effluent weir or controlled by the Effluent Air Lift Pump. The approved System model and associated flow rates are as follows: • Fuji Clean CE5, 0 to 450 GPD • Fuji Clean CE7, >450 to 630 GPD • Fuji Clean CE10, >630 to 900 GPD Conditions of Approval The term "System" refers to the STU in combination with the other components of an on-site treatment and disposal system that may be required to serve a facility in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000. The term "Approval" refers to the technology -specific Special Conditions, the conditions applicable to all STU's, the General Conditions of 310 CMR 15.287, and any Attachments. For Secondary Treatment Units that have been issued Remedial Use Approval for the upgrade or replacement of an existing failed or nonconforming system, the Department authorizes reductions in the effective leaching area (3 10 CMR 15.242), depth to groundwater (3 10 CMR 15.212), and/or depth of naturally occurring pervious material (3 10 CMR 15.240(1)) subject to the Standard Conditions that apply to all Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use and subject to the Special Conditions below applicable to this Technology. In addition to the requirements defined above, this technology will allow installation and operation of at least 50 on-site disposal systems with monthly testing of effluent for BODS, TSS, and pH. Results shall be submitted to the local Approving Authority and the Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Wastewater Management Program Director in Boston. After installation of 50 systems with monthly monitoring data and upon the request of the permittee, the Department may determine that the frequency of monitoring may be reduced to x264853r. doe Fuji Clean USA Models CES, CE7, CE 10 Approval for Remedial Use Date: November 3, 2015 Page 3 of 3 quarterly or that the limitation of 50 systems be removed and the permittee comply only with the special conditions referenced above. In the judgment of the Department this determination will be made based on whether results of sampling indicate that effluent quality is adequate. If the Department reduces the frequency of monitoring, the Department reserves the right to resume more frequent monitoring if effluent quality is not adequate. Sliecial Condit' ns 1. The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit Approved for Remedial Use. In addition to the Special Conditions contained in this Approval, the System shall comply with all the "Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use", except where stated otherwise in these Special Conditions. 2. The System is approved for facilities where the local approving authority finds that: a) there is no increase in the actual or proposed design flow; b) the System is for the upgrade of a failed, failing or nonconforming system; and c) a conventional system with a reserve area, designed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255, cannot feasibly be built on-site. 3. For design of these systems, a separate septic tank preceding the Fuji Clean USA processing is not required and the Title 5 septic tank requirements are not applicable to the processing tank. The processing tank must be sized, designed, and installed according to Company requirements. The record drawings, on file with the local approving authority, shall clearly indicate an area for a septic tank meeting the requirements of Title 5 and the drawings shall indicate that the area is for the sole purpose of installing a Title 5 septic tank in the future, if necessary. The System Owner shall not construct any permanent buildings or structures or disturb the site in any manner that would prevent the installation of a Title 5 septic tank in the future. 4. The System, including a properly sized septic tank, if required, shall be installed between the building sewer and the effluent pump chamber for disposal to the SAS of a system designed and constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.100 - 15.279, subject to the provisions of this Approval. 5, The system must comply with the Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use www.mass.uov/eea/docs/de /water/wastewater/o- thru-v/standrem.Pdf) x264853r.doc INLET 4" rNI 19" MANHOLE - L 7i� PLAN VIEW RECIRCULATION 18" MANHOLE -7 ASSEMBLY - N FLOW OPENING = SECTION A -A VIEW FUJI CLEAN CE30 STRUCTURAL DRAWING PIPE ION (OPTIONAL) rMP —24" MANHOLE VSINFECTION / CYLINDER (OPTIONAL) r� 1 AERATION ASSEMBLY CHAMBER Volume al Sedimentation Chamber 1,200 Anaerobic Filtration Chamber 1,198 Aerobic Contact Filtration Chamber 550 Storage Chamber 268I. Disinfection Chamber _ 17 Total Volume 1 3,233 SPECIFICATIONS Anaerobic Media PP / PE Fillin at 47% Board Type Aerobic Media PVC / PP / PE Filling Rate 17% Aerobic Media PP/PF Fillin Rate 56 Blower 7 elm Tank FRP Piping PVC / PP / PE Access Covers 1 Plastic / Cast Iron Disinfectant (Optional) Chlorine Tablets CE30 Standard Hydraulic Load 12700 GPD SECTION B -B VIEW SCALE: 1/4" = 1" DATE: 05/21/2014 DRAWNBY' &,Fu iC.l.__.ean USA' ... 24" MANHOLE LOW OPENING I i I l0a" � i rIOARD TYPE 1'-5"Y O - CONTACT MEDIA 7._2" L 5 a y RECIRCULATION AIRLIFT ASSEMBLY AEROBIC MEDIA SECTION B -B VIEW SCALE: 1/4" = 1" DATE: 05/21/2014 DRAWNBY' &,Fu iC.l.__.ean USA' ... From: Mike Dunn To: Rob Carlezon Cc: Kevin Gradr Subject: RE: Site Plan - Trevor Lane, Brewster - Job No. 23-060 Date: Thursday, July 6, 2023 2:55:22 PM Attachments: imaae001.ono FCUC-230706111 TREVOR LANE CONDOS PRELIMINARY ,REVD_a f M Thanks for sending this over it helps us to visualize your concept! In the majority of residential applications our units do not require any up -front treatment at all, but since this is a quasi -commercial project meaning it fits under commercial, but the flow is very domestic in nature it can have more inorganics than usual. It is that very reason that we recommend %to 1 day's retention. We usually couple that with the use of a high-quality solids retainer to reduce the TSS that might be present. We understand that you may not wish to go that direction but in essence there is a huge tendency to starve the unit of much needed food in the way of biological materials The essence of advanced treatment is to have a good balance of biological materials and oxygen introduced together to facilitate the growth of better "bugs' that do a more efficient job of breaking down and treating the effluent at a much higher level, so the water is that much cleaner. If you bring the process out of balance via design upfront, performance of the secondary treatment will be effected because of this factor and desired results can suffer from day one. We have put together a quick preliminary concept for your review and use. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to reach out. Best regards, ►TLIM Mike Dunn Fuji Clean USA, LLC 41-2 Greenwood Road Brunswick, ME 04011 USA tel: 207-406-2927 fax: 207-406-2929 cell:267-221-9378 r� F�n.Cleanb% clean%kcr... From: Rob Carlezon <RCarlezon@gradyconsulting.com> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 9:33 AM To: Mike Dunn <mike@fujicleanusa.com> Cc: Kevin Grady <Kevin@gradyconsulting.com> Subject: Site Plan - Trevor Lane, Brewster -Job No. 23-060 Hi Mike, Thank you for speaking with me earlier in regards to my questions about Fuji tanks placed in parallel and how to split the flow to each tank evenly. I attached the Site Plan for our septic repair design down in Brewster, MA. We are currently proposing to retain the existing 8000 gallon septic tank. After that, the effluent would flow to a splitter d -box, and then to 2-FujiClean Model CE30 treatment tanks in parallel. Over the phone you mentioned using a 4,000 gallon septic tank (^'24 hr retention) or smaller before effluent reaches the Fuji Clean CE30 tanks instead of using an 8000 gallon tank (-48 hour retention). There would be more of a chance solids would escape the septic tank if we were to propose a smaller tank since we'd be cutting down the time for solids to settle out. If that were the case, we wouldn't then want solids entering the splitter d -box prior to entering the Fuji -Clean tanks as that would inevitably cause clogging and buildup in the splitter box. Do you have any recommendations or ideas on how we could split up the flow equally if not thru a splitter d -box to account for potential solids making their way through the first septic tank? We're also putting in a Piloting Application in MA for the FujiClean USA CE30 tank, so we want to make sure we design this properly, so any additional details or specs on this would be helpful. Thanks again for your time and let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Rob Carlezon Grady Consulting, L.L.C. 71 Evergreen Street, Suite 1 Kingston, MA 02364 781-585-2300 RCarlezon01prad-,rconsultin.�,.cam Ito n.').com SYSTEM NOTES 1) SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE W FH PRODUCT DESIGN AND INSTALLATION MANUAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION OR THE NWE T DEALER CONTACT PRESBY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 143 AIRPORT ROAD, WHITERIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03598 - PHONE 1-800-473-5298 - WWW,PRESBY ENVIRONMENTALCOM 2) MINIMUM OF 5. OF MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND WITH LESS THAN 2 PASSING A # 200 SIEVE REQUIRED AROUND CIRCUMFERENCE OF ENVIRO-SEPTIC PIPES. (SEE ENVIRO-SEPTIC SIMPLE -SEPTIC LEACHING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND INSTALLATION! MANUAL FOR COMPLETE SAND AND FILL SPECIFICATIONS.) 3) DO NDT INSTALL SYSTEM ON FROZEN GROUND OR LEAVE SYSTEM UNCOVERED FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME. 4) NO VEHICLE TRAFFIC, SNOW REMOVAL, OR DEEP ROOTED VEGETATION IS PERMITTED OVER SYSTEM COMPONENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5) NO DRAINS, HOT TUBS, SAUNAS, GARBAGE DISPOSALS, WATER SOFTENERS, ETC-, SHALL HE INCORPORATED IN70 THIS SYSTEM UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED- ) THE SYSTEM OWNER SHALL HAVE THE SYSTEM INSPECTED ANNUALLY BY AN OPERATOR TRAINED BY THE COMPANY AND SHALL SUBMIT THE RESULTS OF THAT INSPECTION, ON A TECHNOLOGY CHECKLIST, TO THE LOCAL APPROVING AUTHORITY - 7) THE SYSTEM OWNER SHALL RECORD AT THE APPROPRIATE REGISTRY OF DEEDS, A NOTICE DISCLOSING THE EXISTENCE OF THE ALTERNATIVE SEPTIC SYSTEM ON THE PROPERTY AND D.E,P.'S APPROVAL OF THE SYSTEM. WHEN THE PROPERTY IS UNREGISTERED LAND THE NOTICE SHALL BE MARGINALLY REFERENCED ON THE OWNER'S DEED TO THE PROPERTY. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECORDING THE NOTICE, THE SYSTEM OWNER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT AND THE LOCAL APPROVING AUTHORITY (i) A CERTIFIED REGISTRY COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING THE BOOL{ AND PAGE AND (ii) A REGISTRY COPY OF THE OWNER'S DEED TO THE PROPERTY, BEARING THE MARGINAL REFERENCE. 8) INSTALLER SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY PRESBY ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SYSTEM SAND ALL CONFIGURATIONS OF ENVIRO--SEPTIC REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 6" OF SYSTEM SAND SURROUNDING THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE PIPE, PERCENTAGE RESTRICTIONS: 35 OR LESS OF THE TOTAL SAND MAY BE GRAVEL 40-90 OF THE TOTAL SAND IS TO BE COARSE AND VERY COARSE SAND. GRAVEL QUALITY RESTRICTIONS: NO GRAVEL IS TO EXCEED 3/4" DIAMETER- NO GRAVEL IS SMALLER THAN MM .787- IN DIAMETER. (IT MUST NOT PASS THROUGH A #10 SEIVE.) COARSE AND QUALITY SAND RESTRICTIONS. NO COARSE SAND IS SMALLER THAN 0.5MM ,0196" IN DIAMETER. (IT MUST NOT PASS THROUGH A #35SEIVE) IVES QUALITY RESTRICTIONS; NO MORE THAN OF THE TOTAL SAND MAY PASS THROUGH A #200 SEIVE. ASTM STANDARD, C-33 (CONCRETE SAND) MEETS THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS. SURROUNDING SAND SURROUNDING SAND SHOULD BE EITHER SYSTEM SAND OF TITLE 5 FILL, 310 CMR 15,255 (3). ONLY SURROUNDING SAND MAY BE PLACED UDDER RAISED SYSTEMS OR WHERE TOP SOIL AND SOIL HORIZONS WITH ORGANIC MATTER HAVE BEEN REMOVED, PROP, 6" LOW VENT PROP, INSPECTION PORT REPLACE EXISTING FILTER W ZABEL A100 12x28 ADD 20" CJ. FRAME AND COVER FLUSH W FINISH EFFLUENT TEE FILTER (OR APPROVED EQUAL) W GRADE ON INLET AND OUTLET WHERE HEEDED SUPPORT LEG 2. .v xS?. I - FL0' E LIN :J 21-5" ---- -' = 75.' --'- I INSTALL 24" Cl ACCESS FLUSH W FINISH GRADE __------PROP. HIGH VENT ---�-- INSTALL 20" Cl FRAME W f SUPPORT AND ACCESS COVER FLUSH 24" CAST IRON MANHOLE EL.=93.3 W1 FINISH GLADE COVERS FLUSI1 WITH PVD DILL VALVE FINISH GRADE TEE (Tym n pvck 611 rn r SCH 40 5CH 40 -- EL.. 72.x.5 ( ELS8=.01(MIN) FLOWABLJE FILL OR CONCRETE 10' MIN EX1577NC TO BLDG 3 - PRECII `T'0,10?rc T_ rJFic T.;fS C lc r. jirii (CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL TANK WITH CONCRETE OR FtOWABLE FILL TO REDUCE VOLUME INSIDE OF TANK TO 24 HOUR VOLUME) (CONTRACTDR SHALJ! VERIFY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY &#DETAIN IF POSSIBLE) (24 HOUR STORAGE) (COORDINATE WFTH CML ENGINEER TO CONFIRM VOLUME) EI,_WABLE FILL DETAIL I Il I I Ir; rJ IL I --------------- (RE LAIN) . . \ EL -74,51 6" CRUSHED EL34.43 STONE PROPOSED REK CONC_ SPLITTER DIST. BOX W/5 {CUTLETS MIN. (H--20 LOADING) 6" CRUSHED STONE PROPOSED 3-FUJICLEAN USA MODEL CE30 WASTEWATER TREATMENT TANKS IN PARALLEL (H-0 LOADING) ITE I 20' MIN. TO BLDG 10' MIN, TO SLAB 1. PROPERTY LINE DATA FROM PLAN ENTITLED "MASTER SITE PLAN TREVOR VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM" DATED JUNE 14, 1985, PLAN RECORDED AT THE BARN TABLE COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS IN PLAN BOOK 401 OF 70 & 71, 2. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY GRADY CONSULTING, LLC DATED DECEMBER 14, 2023, 3. BOILS TESTING BY ROBERT CARLEZON, GRADY CONSULTING, LLC WITNESSED BY HEALTH AGENT AMY VONHONE SEPTEMBER 14, 2023. 4. {TALL DIG SAFE 1-888-344-7233 AT LEAST 4 DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 5, NOTIFY TOWN AND GRADY CONSULTING PRIOR TD BACKFILLING OF SYSTEM. 6, NO KNOWN WELLS EXIST WITHIN 200' OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM 7. THE SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN AN AQUIFER PROTECTION ZONE II. 8- ALL SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHALL BE MARKED WITH MAGNETIC MARKING TAPE OR A COMPARABLE MEANS IN ORDER TO LOCATE THEM ONCE BURIED (310 CMR 15.221(12)) 9, NO STREAMS, SURFACE & SUBSURFACE DRAINS AND WETLANDS EXIST WITHIN 100 FT OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM - 10. THE SITE IS NOT LOCATED IN A FLOOD PLAIN DISTRICT. 11, A GOLF COURSE EASEMENT IS LOCATED IN THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM, 12, EXCAVATE ALL MATERIAL (A, B, Cl LAYERS) TO MEDIUM SAND C2 LAYER (112") DIRECTLY BELOW SYSTEM. (5' OVERDID NOT REQUIRED PER PRESBY GENERAL USE APPROVAL), REPLACE WITH CLEAN COARSE SAND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 310 CMR 15.255 (.3). EXCAVATION TO BE INSPECTED BY GRADY CONSULTING L,L.C, AND TOWN PRIOR TO SOIL REPLACEMENT APPROXIMATE FERC SAND VOLUME = 102 X 73.3 X (74,3 - 70.6) 127 + 20 = 1233+ C,, a PROP. INSPECTION PORT (TYP) J _ M ''�.,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl� -- PROP_ MANHOLE SUMP DRAIN CTR SPACING I IxVP • linTlvu I ADVANCED ENVIRD-SEPTIC PIPE 7,497 S -F. SAND BED PROPOSED 4,800 LINEAR FEET OF ADVANCED ENVIRO-SEPTIC PIPE PROPOSED 5,886,5 B.F. SAND BED REQUIRED 4,620 LINEAR FEET REQUIRED SYSTEM LAYOUT (SCALE, 1 "=10' ) I I%%Jq . OrLkl%/Le1 *."'A30 P-S.I- CONCPETE @ 28 DAYS KNOCK -OUT OP-NINCS FOR I" Pk,' PFODUCT WEIGHT = 220 LBS - 1 " PISER SEC+101 AVA!LABLE D -BOX DETAIL (SPLITTER D -BOX) (H-20 LOADING) (NOT TO SCALE) T,H,4 £L. 80-70 0'-12" A SANDY LOAM 79-70 12"-28" B SANDY LOAM 78.37 2$"-1IOR C1 LOAMY SAND 71-53 110%120" C2 MED SAND 640..'NC SCH 40 Pvc TEE � 100' LONG ADVANCED ENVIRO SEPTIC PIPE SOIL LOGS c;, T.H,1 E1_,73,83 TR#2 _ T.H.3 TO PRESBY PIPE IN EL, 80,00 72-MAX(80,3) *W LDCAL EL. 81.00 Ob-40;1 EL. jj��80.60 Om-1211 FINISH .�R�,DE ' ffjj v"-40" FILL 76.67 -- FILL 77,67 40"-46" A SANDY LOAM 79-60 40b -4G„ A - IN TRAFFIC ,4REAS - A 12"-28" PFtOI'OSED SANDY LOAM 76-17 SANDY LOAM 77.17 45"-66" B SANDY LOAM 78-27 46* -66" B USE- 1-102' LONG x 37,5' WIDE ADVANCED FNARO-SEPTIC PIPE LEACHING BED SYSTEM B 28"-110" ENVIRO--SEPTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM SANDY LOAM 74.50 SANDY LOAM 75,50 66A-112}1 C1 LOAMY SAND 71.43 66'1-112a C1 c� LAJ C1 *PER STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE SOIL LOAMY SAND 70.67 LOAMY SAND 71.67 112'1-t26" 11108-120" C2 112"-126" ZSIEVE AMPLE AND/OR APPROVED FOR REMEDIAL USE REMISED: MARCH 5, C2 TAKEN G2 MED SAND @120m (FROM-TH#3) MED SAND 69.54 MED SAND 70.50 D= 10-6m D= TC -0" 70,60 D= 10-6R NO WATER NO WATER NO WATER 10'-6" TQ',5" 10'-Dp (EL.=69,50) (EL.=70.50 (EL.=70.60) NO GROUND WATER ENCOUNTERED AT 126" (EL, 69,50) 13Y GRADY CONSULTING, LLC, SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 *."'A30 P-S.I- CONCPETE @ 28 DAYS KNOCK -OUT OP-NINCS FOR I" Pk,' PFODUCT WEIGHT = 220 LBS - 1 " PISER SEC+101 AVA!LABLE D -BOX DETAIL (SPLITTER D -BOX) (H-20 LOADING) (NOT TO SCALE) T,H,4 £L. 80-70 0'-12" A SANDY LOAM 79-70 12"-28" B SANDY LOAM 78.37 2$"-1IOR C1 LOAMY SAND 71-53 110%120" C2 MED SAND 640..'NC SCH 40 Pvc TEE � � � 100' LONG ADVANCED ENVIRO SEPTIC PIPE D UIP DIIf� c;, 2" MIN DROP FROM D -BOX E1_,73,83 _ --- --- S=LEVEL \_6 � TO PRESBY PIPE IN TANKS - SIZES VARY) 72-MAX(80,3) *W LDCAL UPGRADE Low VENT 1,980 GPD {RETAIN FINISH .�R�,DE ' .'18"MIN 78-8 { � EL.=83.3 +R,,0-3 4"OSCH 40 PVC SEALED DRAIN USE: .3 -FUJI CLEAN USA MODEL CE30 SECONDARY TREATMENT_ UNITS (IN PARALLEL) 12" OF STRUCTURAL FtL�, {H=?0 LOADING)��\�'�4 n (MIN) 4■oP �60 SAND�RE{�'D - IN TRAFFIC ,4REAS - � � � � 100' LONG ADVANCED ENVIRO SEPTIC PIPE D UIP DIIf� BY BOARC OF HEALTH '*DEEP HOLE SHA ONFiRM AT LEAST 5 -FT OF SEPARATION E1_,73,83 _ --- --- S=LEVEL \_6 EL,7 .55 2, SEPTIC TANK: 7,260 GPD x 2 = 14,520 GAL- _ 1ST COMPARTMENT (RETAIN EXISTING SEPTIC TANKS - SIZES VARY) 5" CRUSH EL,7 73 -OBJ" SAND 1,980 GPD {RETAIN EXISTING 4,000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (2): 9 UNITS x 2 BR UNIT = 18 BR. x 110 GPD = 1,980 GPD RETAIN) STONE ,63, 4"OSCH 40 PVC SEALED DRAIN USE: .3 -FUJI CLEAN USA MODEL CE30 SECONDARY TREATMENT_ UNITS (IN PARALLEL) . LEACHING CHAMBERS; P.R. <2 MIN/IN (ASSUMED -TO BE CONFIRMED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION)= CLASS I SOIL - MEDIUM SAND 102' LINE (DOUBLE OFFSET ADAPTOR) 10' MIN, � PFtOI'OSED -.�� TITLE 5 MINIMUM AREA = 7,260 GPD 0.74 GPD/S.F. = 9810.81 S.F, PER CERTIFICATION FOR GENERAL USE SECTION II(3) => 40 REDUCTION IN SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM ALLOWED REIN_ CONC. DIST, BOX USE, 1-102' LONG x 73.5' WIDE ADVANCED USE- 1-102' LONG x 37,5' WIDE ADVANCED FNARO-SEPTIC PIPE LEACHING BED SYSTEM W/113 OUTLETS MIN. ENVIRO--SEPTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM ADVANCED ENVIRO-SEPTIC PIPE REQUIRED 420 LF FOR FIRST 6 BR + (70 L.F. X 60 BR) = 4,620 LF REQUIRED (40 SIZE REDUCTION INCLUDED) => 4,800 LF (H-20 LOADING) 48-100 FT PIPE tN 16 COMBINATION SERIAL SECTIONS a_ c� LAJ *PER STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE SOIL Ln 6 ABSORPTION SYSTEMS WTFH GENERAL USE OERnFICATION AND/OR APPROVED FOR REMEDIAL USE REMISED: MARCH 5, 2018, 10 d) THE DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER MAY BE GROUNDWATER EL. 59.5_0 REDUCED UP TO 2.00' (FROM-TH#3) NOTE: (ASSUMED NO G.W. ENCOUNTERED) SUBSURFACE II II p DISPOSAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVOS A DEEP HOLE AT TIME OF L. S tJ I 1 E L E E E JL STE DCINST RUTION TO AT Et VAPDN 67155. PERRM NO EC TEST S Ali HE PDERFORMED (NOT -0 SCALE) - 8Y GRADY OOHSULTING, LLC AT SAME TIME AND SHALL BE SEPT DESIGN (NOT DESIGNED FOR GARBAGE GRADER BY BOARC OF HEALTH '*DEEP HOLE SHA ONFiRM AT LEAST 5 -FT OF SEPARATION FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SYSTEM TO THE E.S.H.G.W. 1, DESIGN DAILY FLOW; 33 UNITS x 2 BR UNIT = 66 BR. x 110 GPD = 7.260 GPD 2, SEPTIC TANK: 7,260 GPD x 2 = 14,520 GAL- _ 1ST COMPARTMENT (RETAIN EXISTING SEPTIC TANKS - SIZES VARY) (PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION USE SEPTIC TANKS WITH 24 HOUR STORAGE VOLUME OR SMALLER) EXISTING 3,000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (1). 9 UNITS x 2 BR UNIT = 18 BR. x 110 GPD = 1,980 GPD {RETAIN EXISTING 4,000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK (2): 9 UNITS x 2 BR UNIT = 18 BR. x 110 GPD = 1,980 GPD RETAIN) EXISTING UNKNOWN SIZE SEPTIC TANK (3) 15 UNITS x 2 SR UNIT = 30 BR, x 110 GPD = 3,300 GPD (RETAIN) (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE) USE: .3 -FUJI CLEAN USA MODEL CE30 SECONDARY TREATMENT_ UNITS (IN PARALLEL) . LEACHING CHAMBERS; P.R. <2 MIN/IN (ASSUMED -TO BE CONFIRMED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION)= CLASS I SOIL - MEDIUM SAND �I lR �I ADVANCED E 1 i* -SEPT DESIGN -USE E.L.R.=0.74 GPD/S,F. (NOT DESIGNED FOR GARBAGE GRINDERS) *USE 7,260 GPD FOR ADVANCED ENVIRO-SEPTIC DESIGN CRTTERJA TITLE 5 MINIMUM AREA = 7,260 GPD 0.74 GPD/S.F. = 9810.81 S.F, PER CERTIFICATION FOR GENERAL USE SECTION II(3) => 40 REDUCTION IN SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM ALLOWED REQUIRED AREA =9,810.81 S.F. LESS 40 =5,886.5 S_F_ USE- 1-102' LONG x 37,5' WIDE ADVANCED FNARO-SEPTIC PIPE LEACHING BED SYSTEM PROPOSED AREA, 102 FT X 73.5 FT = 7,497 S.F. 5,886,5 S.F. ADVANCED ENVIRO-SEPTIC PIPE REQUIRED 420 LF FOR FIRST 6 BR + (70 L.F. X 60 BR) = 4,620 LF REQUIRED (40 SIZE REDUCTION INCLUDED) => 4,800 LF PROPOSED 48-100 FT PIPE tN 16 COMBINATION SERIAL SECTIONS ADVANCED ENVIRO-SEPTIC MAX FLOW PER SERIAL SECTION = 500 GPD LDADIND RATE MAX 7,260 500 = 14.5 SERIAL SECTIONS (MIN) -- USE 16 SECTIONS '1A CONVENTIONAL REPLACEMENT AREAKEVIN S, LEACHING TRENO_HES: P.R. <2 MIN/IN,pY TITLE 5 MINIMUM AREA = 7.260 GPD / 0.74 GPI}/ -F. = 9.810.81 S.F. No. ��� USE: 17-100' LONG X 2' WIDE X 2' DEEP LEACHING TRENCHES 17 X 100 X 6 SFAF = 10,200 X 0,74 = 7,548 > 7,260 GPD 70.70 D= 10-0'1 NO WATER :. (EL.=70.70) 1=1 ; 77 CO F BALI_ SEALED DRAIN SUMP W IN SEWER MANHOLE 201 CAST IRAN COVER EL= 70,50 , AT FINISH GRADE (SEE DETAIL 4" FVC SCH 40 -/ SL1h�P DRAIN LINE 3" SYSTEM SAND 12" ADVANCED ENORO-SEPTIC PIPE .' 6" SYSTEM SAND NOTE- IN THE EVENT OF SYSTEM FAILURE, THE BOTTOM DRAIN ALLOWS EFFLUENT TO IS- (MIN) COVER REQUIREDBE PUMPED FROM THE SYSTEM WITHOUT REQUIRING EXCAVATION. SEF MANUFACTURERS (H-20 LOADING) -\\ SPECIFICATIONS FOR SYSTEM REJUVENATION. �.- PROP,. GEOGRID aINNECT 10 VE�], Lo� ' ., ASN STAND_ C-33 ACCEPTABLE VENT HOLE MUST BE ENLARGED TO 6" OR MANIFOLD TWO 4" OUTLETS BEFORE HOLES 10 DRAM CONDENSATI N 1-O' fi.5' 5' 1.5' 1.5' fi,5 1,5' 18 -OUTLET ATTACHING 6" VENT & NXE WASHED STONE BLOII' D -B0 TO DUN 73,5E --- DOUBLE OFFSET TITLE V FILL. SEE 310 CMR 15,255 6" SAND BELOW PIPES ADAPTERS(typ) (PAGE 46 OF AES }MANUAL) ADVANCED EN'IR-SEPTIC LEACHING X -SECTION NOT TO SCALE SEPTIC REPAIR PLAN .STEM 12-1 TI1 LANE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 1, AFTER EXCAVATION OF LEACHING AREA PRIOR TO INSTALUNO SAIJD_ PREPARED FOR: ,JANUARY t 1, 2023 2. AFTER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. SEPTIC PRESERVATION SERVICES SCALE: VARIES (ADDITIONAL JNSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BOARD OF HEALTH) 102 WEST MAIN STREET J08 No, 23--354 NORTON, MA 02766 GRADY CO SU G, L.L.c. iv// Eni�eers, Lana' .Surveyors & Lands'cope Archiects 1 Evergreen Street, Sud 1, Kir sloe, MA 02364 Phone (761) 1585-2, 00 SHEET 2 OF 4 INLET GAFF 1 4" INLET ISI VI REIT VEN i REMOTE VENTING I�sr .DO t�"T SCALi<� x DISGUISE R ..._ OISi~,IlI$E LOW VENT IN TREE �I VENT 1NSHAU11S I 2;, , 2" MIN OWEER — 2' MIN OVEN s r I EN41FW-E6"r, PIPE TOP OF FINAL GRADE °' { Q< PI -ACE WASH EO - -�+. ! 'DISTRIBUTION BOX STONE AROUND EfIVll41•9@PTI�. 1' ELBOW � NPE �. �+ PLACE YMASH€a STONE AFIM MO ELDOW "41 13ROU14D 1n�ATER A9LE - 1 6' - rIIGHQIRI UNDwg7ERr TABLE .. _ CiRILLSEVERAL714`0AD4 ZS Ar LOWPOFMTdr- ELSOW TO OFiAw { omoEmsATION. LOAN P'OIF4T MUST 6E A50 VE fie 0$0NAL MIGH WATER TASL E_ 'SENTING DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) 74 5-11" 18" MANHOLE iREIT,MAI011amN00 PLAN VIEW RECIRCULATION ASSEMBLY r .. 4" MANHOLE FLAN OPENING SECTION A -A VIEW TOP VIEW SI -VE WE k/ END VIE 4 LEVEL ���* it 0 � 4' e P1 .90. PVA PI '9o' ❑FF 4 ,4 TF 17FFSET ,4Df F'TER J2–SCJ'SIL PIPS DO NET INSERT PVC` PIPE HL7RE EyVIRD-SEPTIC' PIPE TN+4iV 9' I T a f -SET .ADAPTER CONNECTION DETAIL OUTLET PIPE IIfFEDTIN YLINDER (OPTIONAL) FFLUENT IRLIFT PUMP DISINFECTION CYLINDER (OPTIONAL) t 7 8 t 5,-87 , 8 1< (NOT TO SCALE) ACME-SHEY CARVER, MA WAFHf O1'ERkEkYl7Cl3O1iLM7'5 HARWICH, MA 334 TRE MONTSTRF�T PHONE{549}5dS-96137 3L6RL- _ v x 021 CONCRETE COVER r—STEEL LiFTI NG HOOKS" DISTRIBUTION BOX (4'-8" X 4--11 1 H2O 18 Outlets ITEM# D131 82 wt. 4,400 Lbs 111-5.1 1 sht I of 2 SPECIFICATIONS CHAMBER Volume (gal) 1,200 Anaerobic Media Sedimentation Chamber Filling Rate Anaerobic Filtration Chamber 11198 PVC I PP ,r. PE Aerobic Contact Filtration Chamber 550 .Aerobic Media Storage Chamber 2 17 °0 Disinfection Chamber Total Volt airt 3,233 SPECIFICATIONS Anaerobic Media PP 1 PE Filling Rate 47% Board Type Aerobic Media PVC I PP ,r. PE Filling lute 17% .Aerobic Media PP 1 PE Tilling bate °0 Blower 7 dni Tank FRP Piping PVC 1 PP ,,. PE Access Covers Plastic el Cast fron Disinfectant (Optional) Chlorine Tablets CE30 Standard H-vdraulic Load 2700 GPD AERATION ASSEMBLY FUJI CLEAN MODEL_E DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) T-2 " r- SECTION B -B VIEW 4" MANHOLE FLAN OPENING BOARD TYPE CONTACT MEDIA RECIRCULATION AIRLIFT ASSEMBLY AEROBIC MEDIA ACME -SHORE 14 PA1Fi AVr CONCRETE f IflO 3UC-M �4 s II li (2) STEEL LIFTING HOOKS (1) 021" CONCRETE COVER (C,21) `yl ;1 r I L , V -- - ' '–(18) " OUTLET KNOCKOUT (6) PER 3 -SIDES DISPERSING VVALL. Vp 08" INLET KNOCKOUTS —:91 _F ------ {TOP OF WALL) 000 1'D" ir0'S• - 4'-11 „ NAME: DI STR IBUTI0N BOX, 18 0UTLET H-20 ITEM## D 11316 Comre-c Vinimum Strerq'-i ;_,DCO P. 5J. at 28 days TOP 1,400 Lbs C GATE: 1 1-9-2019 Steel Relnrorcment:AS"M A615 Grade 6C Cesicn 0a ding 6tagald units' AASHTO- 120 BOTTOM 3,000 Lbs 1 -OUTLET D -BOX DETAIL (H-20 LOADING) (NOT TO SCALE) 12"t NDS ROUND VALVE PUC SCREW—TYPE CAP BOX (OFF PAVEMENT) SET AT FINISH GRADE WITH—IN 3 INCHES OF FINISH GRADE LGNISH GRADE % 0 PRESBY (P7RESBY PIPE r E o SYSTEM SAND: SYSTEM SAND NATURALLY OOCURIN PERVIOUS — — -- - MATERIAL 4"0 PERFORATED INSPECTION PORT TO BOTTOM OF SYSTEM SAND AND THREADED CAP WITHIN Y OF FINAL GRADE, WRAP PIKE WITH PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO ELIMINATE• SAND INFILTRATION INSPECTION POEN D ETAI L NOT TO SCALE *ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED FOR FUJI CLEAN AIR BLOWER. ANY ELECTRICAL WORD MUST BE BONE B A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN, WHO MUST HAVE WORK INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN WIRING INSPECTOR. ANY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS SHALL DE CONNECTED TO AN ELECTRICAL SERVICE THAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ASSOCIATION AND NOT AN INDIVIDUAL UNIT OWNER. MANHOLE FRSE & COVER (H--20 LOADING) MORTAR I COURSES OF BRICK MIN. RfINF- CQNC- CONE 5EC110N $• 6 COURSE5 OF BRICK MAX (3f8" MORTAR JOINTS) POINT VP BRICKWORK OUTLINE b d • WSi7C JOINT GASKET—— C". ASKET—C". ALL M.H. JOINTS) PLUO ALL i li TItdG HOLES PER FED, SPEC. SS -5-210, ALUMINUMWITH NON—SHRINK MORTAR TYPE 1, 1-1/4" OC CTR, M -Fs. STEPS A ' CONCRETE WALL e REINF. CDND- CONE SECTION — . Qa 5" 'AIN .- 4-' — D" 01A. —5„ MIN FORM GROOVE IN BASE W1 ACCURATE BEL RING FORM 1' PRECAST MOf+OLTHIC - b BA E/B, REL SECTION BALL EL= 72,00 VALVE SUMP [)FAIN — VOLUME FROM BOTTOM OF STRUCTURE T4 EL= 70,50 6° i� INVERT OF INLET PIKE pp * = 141 GALLONS 6" SELECT MATERIAL 2 — #4 EW IN ADDITION TO WOVEN WIRE MESH UMP DRAIN NOT TO SCALE rr~►��-���s *o If tclrvl� '`�I GRAD' f G�VIL Iyo. 4626A SEPTIC REPAIR PLAN SYSTEM 12-1 TREVOR LANE BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS PREPARED FOR: JANUARY i1, 2023 SEPTIC PRESERVATION SERVICES SCALE. VARIES 102 WEST MAIN STREET JOB No. 3-354 NORTON, MA 02766 LIV. GRADY CONSULTING, L.I.C. Civil Engineers, Lard Surlre ors & Landscape Architects 1 Evergreen 5greet, Sude 1, Kiag6t o,7, MA 02J64 Phone (781) 585-2300 SHEET F 4 hl� VENT MAINIFOLO -— I� ? r EXTEND FABRIC 3' MIFF BEYOND PAVEMENT EDGE OF PIPE (ALL EDGES) Llmu(NO70NES K RUN GRAVEL_ OVER "IPJ} 12" MIDI (BELOW PAVEMENT) BOTTOMDRAINS RECOMMENDED WHEN6" SYSTEM BAND AES PIPE ENDS ARE INACCESSIBLE NO SANS VOIDS ALLOWED, WALK BETWEEN I INSTALL STAB] UZATION FABRIC WITH A ROWS (COMP R ESSI NG SAND) TO ENSURE SAND AES PIPE GRUB TENSILE STRENGTH OF 315 LBS PER FILLS ALL VOIDS AROUND AES PIPES. ASTM D4632" SIX INCHES OVER AES PIPE 'AjeS pipe tmtb 18' of sfructura I cover is desig nod fur H- 20 ioa ding by Presby Envrrorrnwnta1. Inc. The Mass DEP makes no de€ermina bon that €his design meets the H-20 loading requrrea7ent- H,--0 LOADING DETAIL PAVEMENT CROSS_SEGTI (NOT TO SCALE) 1.5 Tan Stages ofWasummater Treatment Aovanceal Envlro saj tpc"&A.5 with Treatment Sy yarn Teri steps of %wWrym{e, treatment. Aduilnoed Enviro-Oopfi0V (AES) Ueatr efflue n t rrQre efflc."tly to prowlae longer system life a^d to pmsW the envirannre-t -- RCWN SCAM tALwars UP] -AIRSPACE I � $CUM cls -EFFLUENT -SLUDGE I 'I`ELEFIAI � I SYSTEM SAND -' - - - G'ROfiSSEC710N - - p _-4) SKIMMER TABS ti 6Eo-1FXTILr -4' 4 RIPOE5 FAB RIG COARSIE BIo-ACC ELERATOR¢ Flf3ftt5 FAEf{rC Stage 1: V¢'prrn effluent tuft" the v" "d is Ci?Oled to ground temperature "Stage 1r: Su*emed 9d K1# 54tp?ra;v fr4+n the Cooie4 64LJ d e111uerrl Stage 3: $ nwTW FS Further capture yrme �Pntf #p#*nded Solids riOM the "istng elfl.rert. Stage 4- Ape noges allow the elvent to f rw uninterrupted around the CirCUrrdererce of the p *nd 5m n €coling. Stage 5: The AES 13*-AacelaratorO fabric scree. s add-tianal r,alida tram tree effluent, enha noes and aeaelemtee, treatrnard. facilitator, quick dart -up after periacs cf nort-use, provides additional surface area for bacterial growth, promotes even distribution, and fu hhe• prereets autar 'agars and va recerdin�j urTare# sin they remain peTneable. StBQg 6: A mat of curse randomly-Dderted fibers separates mare suspendea sol idr, from -he effl.aent 8t'agL 7. Effluent passer, -ntothr, geo-textile fabrics and g-ov:s a protected oacteria: surface. Wge 0. Sand wicks liquid to om the geo-;exble "abr rs and enables ail to transfer 10 the tacbe, iai sutace. SUge 9- Tree fabr" and fibers pmwide a la 1W badeseal surFaae to bmak down #Gfid#. $%ge IQ; lin ampllkair supply and llucWWw>tg 6quld I"I9 increase baowial OlKier' - AES A,teraetive SAS w Treatment D 8L I Manual far W., f� Presby EnviromaKntal, Inc. C;ecwnber 2D1 Edition .2. FLOOR 'A' rFLWR PLAN '0' +UZR &M 'Op I � I I r,A-nv r r PAT r � _e14 - - I PATI - `r-w%rim L 11 1 Is t - %111 a 1�Sle�a:-r-sr_ w 0 . . -1 Ll In. rw_. 1 f [ 149:4 ra I M FLOOR PLAN W FLOOR FLAN V FLOOR PU. U V 1 f TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS - TREMOR LANE - SYSTEM 12-2 (NOT - (NOT TO SCALE) -- I& CONDO UNITS ASSOCIATED WITH SEPTIC ADDRESS UNIT No. FROM DEEDI FLOOR PLAN 17 TREVOR LANE 45 A -END SYSTEM 12-1 No. OF BEDROOMS 2 19 TREVOR LANE 44 C -MIDDLE 2 21 TREVOR LANE 43 B -END 2 38 TREVOR LANE 24 B -END 2 39 TREVOR LANE 46 B - ENQ 2 40 TREVOR LANE 23 C -MIDDLE 2 41 TREVOR LANE 47 C -MIDDLE 2 42 43 TREVOR TREVOR LANE LANE 22 4$ A-E ND A -END 2 2 44 TREVOR LANE 21 A - ENb 2 45 TREVOR LANE 49 A -END 2 46 TREVOR LANE 20 C -MIDDLE 2 47 TREVOR LANE 50 C -MIDDLE 2 48 TREVOR LANE 19 B - ENQ 2 49 TREVOR LANE 51 B -END 2 50 TREVOR LANE 18 B -END 2 52 TREVOR LANE 17 C -MIDDLE 2 54 TREVOR LANE 16 q - ESQ 2 55 TREVOR LANE 52 A - ENC1 2 56 TREVOR LANE 15 A -END 2 57 TREVOR LANE 53 C - MIDDLE 2 58 TREVOR LANE 14 C -MIDDLE 2 59 TREVOR LANE 54 B -SND 2 60 TREVOR LANE 13 B - EIVD 2 61 TREVOR LANE 55 B -END 2 63 TREVOR LANE 56 C -MIDDLE 2 65 TREVOR LANE 57 A - ENb 2 66 TREVOR LANE 12 B -END 2 2 68 TREVOR LANE 11 C -MIDDLE A -END 70 TREVOR LANE 10 2 2 2 t 72 TREVOR LANE 9 A -END 74 TREVOR LANE 8 C -MIDDLE 76 TREVOR LANE 7 B -END 2 TOTAL NUMBER OF BEDROOMS = 66 ADVANCED ENVIR -SEPTIC PIPE CROSS-SECTION kF {NOT TO SCALE) GRADY CML No. 46254 6CJ1t .�I SEPTIC REPAIR PLAN SYSTEM 1.2-1 TREVOR LANE BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS SPARED FOR; JANUARY 11, 2023 SEPTIC PRESERVATION SERVICES SCALE= VARIES 102 WEST MAIN STREET JOB No. 3-354 NORTON, SIA 02766 GRADY CONSULTING, L.L.C. ivll Engineers, Land Surveyor,- & Lor7dscope Architects 1 Evergrea17 Street, SOe 1, Kln soon, YA 02J64 Phone (781) 585-2300 SHEET 4 OF 4 MAIN OFFICE: KEN 49 Herring Pond Road Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 TEL: (508) 833-0070 FAX: (508) 833-2282 January 30, 2024 Brewster Board of Health c/o Amy Von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. — Health Director 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 RE: Board of Health Variance and Local Upgrade Approval Request 9-15 Lower Road (Map 37 Parcel 1) Dear Board Members: NANTUCKET OFFICE: 19 Old South Road Nantucket, MA 02554 TEL: (508) 325-0044 www.brackenenF.com On behalf of the Applicant, Arthur N. Luke, TR of Luke -Brewster Realty Trust, Bracken Engineering, Inc. (BEI) respectfully submits the following variance requests for the construction of a leaching facility within the 100 -foot required setback to Surface Waters under the definition of the Brewster Leaching Facility Setback regulation. In addition, Local Upgrade Approval is requested under Title 5 (15.405(1)(b)) for an increase in allowable depth over a soil absorption system. In the following narrative, Soil Absorption System, S.A.S. and leaching facility shall be used interchangeably to refer to the proposed leaching field. Existine Conditions & Wetland Resource Areas Surface Watersil The property is a developed parcel containing a mixed use building containing a Dunkin' Donuts, Luke's Liquors, and Thrift Store on the first floor and residential apartments on the second floor. Generally speaking, the entirety of the upland area of the parcel is developed with the existing structure, asphalt pavement, loading docks & utility pads and all other associated landscaping, walks, etc. The existing septic system consists of the following: • A 1,000 gallon grease trap flowing into a 2,500 primary septic tank (servicing the Dunkin Donuts); • A 2,500 gallon primary septic tank (servicing the thrift store, Lukes Liquors, and the residential apartments); • A MicroFAST 4.5 secondary treatment unit which received flow from both primary septic tanks; • A 4,000 gallon final effluent pump chamber which received flow from the MicroFAST 4.5 unit; • Distribution box which received flow from the pump chamber; and • Three (3) — 2W' x 2'D x 68'L leaching trenches which receive flow from the distribution box. The existing system resides in the front of the structure within the existing parking area. The existing system was originally designed under the 1978 code however it was modified circa 2005 to add the additional MicroFAST 4.5 unit and pump chamber to allow the Dunkin Donuts. Wetland resource areas on or adjacent to the locus parcel include a Bordering Vegetated Wetland delineated by Environmental Restoration & Consulting LLC on January 4, 2023, Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF), and an associated Coastal Bank. PrQuosed Proiect The Applicants are proposing a septic repair to include the following work: • Removal and replacement of existing leaching trenches with a leaching bed designed in accordance with current Title 5 design flows; • Installation of an additional 4,000 gallon pump chamber; • Installation of a second MicroFAST 4.5 unit to run parallel with the existing MicroFAST unit; and, Re uested Variances In accordance with the Brewster Health Regulations relating to Leaching Facility Setbacks, the following variances are requested to allow the construction of the proposed leaching facility: 1. A 25'f divergence from full compliance is requested for a 75't setback to a soil absorption system from a Bordering Vegetated Wetland — classified as a surface water by the Town of Brewster. 2. A 43'f divergence from full compliance is requested for a 57'f setback to a soil absorption system from a Coastal Bank — classified as a surface water by the Town of Brewster. The above variance requests have been made due to constraints on the lot based on its size, topography, and soil conditions. It is the opinion of this firm that refusal to grant the above requested variances should be considered unjust based on the following: The topography of the lot includes the existing structure, which occupies a large portion of the upland area and the portion of the parcel highest in elevation. To maximize the highest elevation available on the parcel, promoting maximum groundwater separation, the proposed system has been sited as shown on the attached plans. The soil conditions on the parcel were analyzed, both through record soil logs as well as borings performed McGardle-Gannon Associates at the request of BEI. The borings were conducted on the easterly side of the existing structure. This area was reviewed by BEI as a potential site for the soil absorption system, however excessive depth to permeable native soil (15-20 ft min.) mandated the area infeasible for construction without risk to the existing structure or abutting property. The parcel, while over three acres in its entirety (138,016 s.f. to the tie lines), is generally occupied by wetland resource areas (Bordering Vegetated Wetland). As such, limited upland area restricts the allowable location of a proposed soil absorption system while maintaining adequate separation to existing ground water. In addition, the existing soil absorption system does not meet Title 5 requirements for separation of ground water or current design load. The proposed system provides for additional separation to groundwater, additional treatment through the proposed MicroFAST 4.5 unit and complies with current Title 5 design flow requirements. The proposed system shall provide equivalent levels of environmental protection when compared to a system in full compliance with Title 5 and Town of Brewster Health Regulations. Local Upgrade Anaroval The proposed system shall require Local Upgrade Approval under Title 5 section 15.405(1)(b) — A 0.8'± divergence from full compliance is requested for a 3.8'I depth of cover over a soil absorption system. This above is requested to allow appropriate grading of the parking area over the soil absorption system. Conclusion In closing and on behalf of our client, Bracken Engineering, Inc would like to thank the Board Members and staff in advance for their time and assistance with this project. It is this firm's belief that approving the above referenced variances and Local Upgrade Approval requests shall provide the best possible placement of the proposed leaching facility. We look forward to meeting with you to review the project in more detail. Should you require any further information or have any questions prior to the scheduled hearing, please contact our office at 508-833-0070 or email the undersigned at zac-Lbrackenen-..com. Sincerely, Bracken Engineering, Inc. Zachary L. Basinski, PE, CFM Senior Project Manager Cc: The Luke -Brewster Realty Trust Robert Dewar, EIT Project Manager r3ol� f�a�i 1,7/.20 RBWB TOWN OF BREWSTER OFFICE OF of ;.Low �HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2198 MAIN STREET s BREWSTER, MA 02631 Y a . PHONE: (508) 896-3701 Exr 1120 FAx: (508) 896-4538 �� �a,BREWSTER-MA.GOV 514yw�s�d»�tta�st Received: /�Paid: c_ 'L -PS< .t Application for Board of Heal;/ub Variances Abutter Deadl ne:� ❑In -House Local Upgrade Approvallic Hearing _ P9 PP Date: January 30, 2024 _ SUB]ECT PROPERTY ADDRESS' 9-15 Lower Road -Brewster, MA Map: 37 Parcel: 1 LC Plan: Lot: Book: 2664 Page: 276 LC Certificate: Name of Applicant: The Luke Brewster Realty Trust Mailing Address: 15 Lower Road Brewster, MA 02631 Telephone # 508-833-0070 (A ent Email: _Lac@brackeneng.com (A -gent) Owner(s) of Record : The Luke Brewster Realty Trust Mailing Address: 15 Lower Road Brewster, MA 02631 _ Design Engineer/Sanitarian: Zachary L. Basinski, PE, CFM Firm/Company Name: Bracken Engineering, Inc Mailing Address: 49 Herring Pond Road Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 Telephone #: 508-833-0070 _ Email address: zac@brackeneng.com Signature: New Construction ❑ Voluntary Upgrade ❑Addition/Alteration Ki Failed system ❑Real Estate Transfer ❑ Design flow of existing system: 1,651 GPD Reason for failure: Hydraulic Failure of Existing S.A.S. Design flow of proposed system: 1,658 GPD Total sewage flow of site: 1651 3PD, Total lot size (sf): 138,016 SF (to tie line) Conservation Commission approval required: yes R no ❑ 01/09/2024 Order of Conditions/Det. Of Applicability attached ® Date of ConCom hearing: List of all Variances from State and Local codes Ladd sheets if needed TITLE 5 Sec. #: Description of Variance(s) 15.405 1 b Local Upgrade Approval - 0.8' diver ence from full compliance requested for a 3.8' depth cover over soil absorptions stem Approved by:._ _ Date:_. Health Department N:%Health\BOH regsllnHouse Septic Local Upgrade Approval 20191Varianceapplication FINAL NONFILLABLE FORM 12.18.19.docx 4 Abutters List Within 300 feet of Parcel 37/1/0 37/4/0 0 PAINES CREEK 37!510 3� PAINES CREEK ROXD 1 377310 t 1 � PAINES CREEK R D ti 37/210 LOUVER ROA& 37/6010 1 1009 MAIN STI 3719270 1008 MAIN STREET / Key Parcel ID �aT�9 TOWN OF BREWSTER, MA 0� s BOARD OF ASSESSORS 3 =11 � �'= 2198 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 0 g MA 0 MAIN STREET 2198 MAIN STREET MA (21-3) Abutters List Within 300 feet of Parcel 37/1/0 37/4/0 0 PAINES CREEK 37!510 3� PAINES CREEK ROXD 1 377310 t 1 � PAINES CREEK R D ti 37/210 LOUVER ROA& 37/6010 1 1009 MAIN STI 3719270 1008 MAIN STREET / Key Parcel ID Owner _ MA Location Mailing Street 2278 6-14-0-E BREWSTER TOWN OF MA 0 MAIN STREET 2198 MAIN STREET MA (21-3) CONSERVATION COMMISSION MA 02631 BREWSTER T 2 6-43-0-E BREWSTER TOWN OFDuplicate 0 WINGS ISLAND 2198 MAIN STREET WINCHESTER (1-1) CONSERVATION COMMISSION BREWSTER MA 02631 2273 37-1-0-R LUKE BREWSTER REALTY TRUST Applicant 9-15 LOWER ROAD 15 LOWER ROAD (20-39) _ 2272 37-2-0-R NEVIN PAULETTE R 29 LOWER ROAD 29 LOWER ROAD (20-38) _ 2234 37-3-0-R NEVIN NEAL L & PAULETTE R 0 PAINES CREEK ROAD 29 LOWER ROAD (20-4) TRUSTEES 24 37-4-0-E BREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST 0 PAINES CREEK ROAD 36 RED TOP ROAD (1-21) TRUSTEES _ 2233 37-5-0-E BREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST 375 Duplicate PAINES CREEK ROAD 36 RED TOP ROAD (20-3) TRUSTEES- _ 2232 37-6-0-R SHARON MICHAEL J & MARY P 393 PAINES CREEK ROAD 4 LESLIE ROAD (20-2) •- _ _ _ 2266 37-60-0-E BREWSTER TOWN OF Duplicate p 1009 MAIN STREET 2198 MAIN STREET (20-29) CONSERVATION COMMISSION 2267 37-92-0-E BREWSTER TOWN OF Duplicate 1008 MAIN STREET 2198 MAIN STREET (20-30) CONSERVATION COMMISSION 2265 37-93-0-E CAPE COD MUSEUM OF 0 MAIN STREET 869 MAIN STREET (20-27) NATURAL HISTORY James M. Gam, MAA Y Assessw 100 ft Mailing City ST ZipCcd/Country BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 WINCHESTER MA 01890 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 BREWSTER MA 02631 1 2/1 112 02 3 Page 1 6-14-0-E 6-43-0-E 37-1-0-R BREWSTER TOWN OF BREWSTER TOWN OF CONSERVATION COMMISSION CONSERVATION COMMISSION LUKE BREWSTER REALTY TRUST 2198 MAIN STREET 2198 MAIN STREET 15 LOWER ROAD BREWSTER, MA 02631 BREWSTER, MA 02631 BREWSTER, MA 02631 37-2-0-R 37-3-0-R 37-4-0-E NEVIN NEAL L & PAULETTE R BREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST NEVIN PAULETTE R TRUSTEES TRUSTEES 29 LOWER ROAD 29 LOWER ROAD 36 RED TOP ROAD BREWSTER, MA 02631 BREWSTER, MA 02631 BREWSTER, MA 02631 37-5-0-E 37-6-0-R 37-60-0-E BREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST BREWSTER TOWN OF TRUSTEES SHARON MICHAEL J & MARY P CONSERVATION COMMISSION 36 RED TOP ROAD 4 LESLIE ROAD 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MA 02631 WINCHESTER, MA 01890 BREWSTER, MA 02631 37-92-0-E BREWSTER TOWN OF CAPE COD MUSEUM OF CONSERVATION COMMISSION NATURAL HISTORY 2198 MAIN STREET 869 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MA 02631 BREWSTER, MA 02631 37-93-0-E CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECIEPT REQUESTED BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Date: 1/30/2024 Re: 9-15 Lower Road - Brewster, MA , Map: 37 Lot: - 1 Subject Address Dear Abutter: A public hearing has been scheduled for the Brewster Board of Health to take action on an application for variances from the regulations of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Title 5, and/or the Town of Brewster Regulations for Subsurface Disposal of Sewage. The following variances are requested: List of all variances from State and Town Codes Brewster Reg. # - Leaching Fac. Setback Leachina Fac. Setback Descri _ til of variances) ocai Upgrade Approval requested for a 0.8' divergence from full compliance for a 3.8' depth of cover over an S. A 25'+/ - A 43'+/ - of variance(s) _ ,e from full compliance requested for a 75+/- setback to a leaching facility from a wetland from full compliance requested for a 57'+/- setback to a Bank Said hearing will be held at the Brewster Town Offices, 2198 Main Street, Brewster, on February 7th, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. The application and plans are available for review at the Brewster Health Department, Brewster Town Offices, 2198 Main Street, Brewster, MA, Monday through Friday (excluding holidays) from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Since ly, r---._ 1 J . 6143 mS L+, P4, CPM � L Applicant/Representative 8 rAtkc� ins �r-n-�`f, mac• CC: Brewster Health Department N:\Health\BOH regs\[nHouse Septic Local Upgrade Approval 2019\Publichearingabutternotification NONFILLABLE FORM 12.11.19.docx m N r` ru m ru Certified Fee: $ 4.40 o Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.65 rru Total Postage & Fees: $ 8.69 Ln r -q TOWN OF BREWSTER r' CONSERVATION COMMISSION O 2198 MAIN STREET .o 1 BREWSTER, MA 02631 Ln n' � 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH mark 3re Postal CERTIFIED oRECEIPT r Domestic Mail Ontv rtj LO lu `Postage: $ .64 r-9 Certified Fee: $ 4.40 rk a Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.658 ru I Total Postage & Fees: $ 8.69 O g rte`- ; Cape Cod Museum of Natural History 0 3 869 MAIN STREET � �BREWSTER, MA 02631 Ln Q- 14 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH ur U1 M ru 300, January 2[ Ln N Postage: $ .64 Certified Fee: $ 4.40 Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.65 ru Total Postage & Fees: $ 8:69 C3 o 9 MICHAEL J. & MARY P SHARON Er s 4 LESLIE ROAD 4 s WINCHESTER, MA 01890 0 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH tmark ere ruT CERTIFIED ■ M Domestic - ru w For delivery information, visit Postage: ru '. +� A $ 4.40 mark Ln Return Receipt Fee: � Postage: 4gy-" Postage: Certified Fee: $ 4:4:' `may o Return Receipt Fee: $ I -.65 ru Total Postage &Fees: $ Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.65 ra N ru O $ 8.69 - Ln Brewster Conservation Trust, Trustees C3 . 36 RED TOP ROAD Er ED , BREWSTER, MA 02631 TRS � i 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH ------------" I CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIF M cn For delivery information, website - ru r Ln nj ru Postage: $ .64 r9 Certified Fee: $ 4.40 mark Ln Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.65 Ife ru rmu Postage: $ 64 Certified Fee: $ 4.40 y pa�c N E3 Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.65 ra N ru Total Postage & Fees: $ 8.69 - Ln 0 ra I r -Neal M L. & Paulette R Nevin, TRS 29 LOWER ROAD Q' 13 BREWSTER, MA 02631 � 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIF a, 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH - �..�.,�lao.wxna,valrrartrs� ru Ln nj ru Postage: $ .64 r9 Certified Fee: $ 4.40 mark P Return Receipt Fee: $ 3.65 Ife ru Total Postage & Fees: $ 8.69 Ln N E3 PAULETTE R NEV IN jr 29 LOWER ROAD cD BREWSTER, MA 02631 a, 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster - BOH - �..�.,�lao.wxna,valrrartrs� 1k 1r�� 1vlcArnle uuannon TEST BORING LOG Associates, Inc. loneem N �nsultants PROJECT: Proposed Septic System - 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster, MA CLIENT: Luke's Super Liquors 4-nNTRAC'TOR- Geosearch.Inc. Date Time Water Casing Hole I Type 05/23/23 10:45am 6 4 8 Size I.D. 2.0 0.3 Medium dense, brown to dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, little (-) Silt, Hammer Wt. 6 - 3 Hammer Fall De th p Case Sampler Sample p Sample Sample Elev- in Strata BPF Blows DENSITY Number/ Depth Recov- ation/ Feet Change (Drill) 2.0 Per 6" 2.0 Type Range ery Depth 9 Soft min/ft' - T - Thin Wall Tube RQD% 10-30 3 ftl in ft - U - Undisturbed Piston Samples: BORING MGA -1 30-50 Dense 50+ Very Dense -SAND- - C - Diamond Core - B - Bulk/Grab Sample 13 BORING MGA -1 MGA NO.: W1007 SHEET NO.: 1 of 2 LOCATION N : See Plan E: ELEVATION: 14'± HSA Split Spoon - DATE START : 05/23/2023 4-1/4" 1-3/8" -- END : 05/23/2023 -- 140# - DRILLER: Chris Stamos -- 30" - ENGINEER : Robert Drowl FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS 0 16 S-1 0.0 14 - , -tA13Frl/tl•1- Loose, wet, brown, fine to medium SAND, little (-) Silt. 12 2.0 0.3 Medium dense, brown to dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, little (-) Silt, 6 - 3 trace fine Gravel. 5 3 -FELL- BLOWSIFT. DENSITY 12.0 CONSISTENCY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY _ 7 S-2 2.0 12 2.0 Medium dense, light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt. Station: 4-10 Loose 9 Soft 4.0 - T - Thin Wall Tube Rock: 10-30 3 4 - 8 Medium Stiff 11 11 - U - Undisturbed Piston Samples: BORING MGA -1 30-50 Dense 50+ Very Dense -SAND- - C - Diamond Core - B - Bulk/Grab Sample 4 S-3 4.0 6 Light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt. 300 Oak Street, Suite 460 Pembroke, MA 02359 I Telephone 781.826.0040 I Fax 781.735.0418 I mcardlegannon.com 5 _ 5.0 9.0 - - 7 S -3A 5.0 10 5.0 Olive -brown, fine SAND and SILT. 8 6.0 6 9 S-4 6.0 14 Medium dense, wet, fine SAND and SILT 6 8.0 6 -SAND & S1LT- 6 7 12 Olive -brown, wet, fine SAND and SILT, trace (-) fine Gravel. S-5 8.0 6 - 9.0 9 II 1 8 S -5A 9.0 12 Brown to reddish -brown, wet, fine SAND, some Silt. 8 10.0 4.0 _ - 5 S-6 10.0 6 10.0 Reddish -brown, wet, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt. 4 S -6A 10.5 12 3.5I - _ -SAND- 4 10.5 10.5 Medium stiff to stiff, wet, gray, SILT & CLAY. 4 12.0 -SILT & CLAY - 2.0 12 _10 S-7 12.0 10 12.0 Medium dense, wet, brown, fine to medium SAND, little (-) Silt_ 12 14.0 - 12 14 -SAND- 15 2 S-8 15.0 18 Loose, wet, brown, fine to medium SAND, little (-) Silt. 3 17.0 - 3 3 BLOWSIFT. DENSITY BLOWS/FT. CONSISTENCY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY 0-4 Very Loose 0 - 2 Very Soft - - S - Split Spoon Station: 4-10 Loose 2-4 Soft - T - Thin Wall Tube Rock: 10-30 Medium Dense 4 - 8 Medium Stiff - U - Undisturbed Piston Samples: BORING MGA -1 30-50 Dense 50+ Very Dense 8-15 Stiff 15-30 Very Stiff - C - Diamond Core - B - Bulk/Grab Sample 30+ Hard 300 Oak Street, Suite 460 Pembroke, MA 02359 I Telephone 781.826.0040 I Fax 781.735.0418 I mcardlegannon.com 'IVV. { * McArdle Gannon TEST BORING LOG BORING MGA -1 Associates, Inc. Engineers & Consultants PROJECT: Proposed Septic System - 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster, MA MGA NO.: W1007 CLIENT: Luke's Su ser Liquors SHEET NO.: 2 of 2 Case Sampler Sample Sample Elev- Depth Sample in Strata BPF Blows Number/ Depth ery Dept FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Change (Drill) Per 6" Range ery Depth Feet imin/ft) tRQD%) Type (ft) 1in5 (ft) 18 h 21 1• 24 27 30 h 33 36 J. H/12 S-9 20.0 12 4 22.0 4 4 S-10 25.0 6 -11.5 7 S -10A 25.5 18 25.5 6 25.5 6 27.0 Loose, wet, beige, fine to coarse SAND, trace (-) Silt. -SAND- Light brown, wet, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt. Medium dense, wet, gray, fine SAND, some Silt. -SILTY SAND- WOH S-11 30.0 24 Loose, wet, gray, fine SAND, some Silt. 2 32.0 6 - 6 _ -18.0 T 32.0 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 32 FEET BLOWS/FT. DENSITY BLOWS/FT. CONSISTENCY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY Station: 0 - 4 Very Loose 0 - 2 Very Soft - S - Split Spoon 4-10 Loose 2 - 4 Soft - T - Thin Wall Tube Rock: 10-30 Medium Dense 4 - 8 Medium Stiff - U - Undisturbed Piston Sam les: BORING MGA -1 30-50 Dense 50+ Very Dense 8-15 Stiff 15-30 Very Stiff - C - Diamond Core - B - Bulk/Grab Sample 30+ Hard 300 Oak Street, Suite 460 Pembroke, MA 02359 1 Telephone 781.826.0040 1 Fax 781.735.0418 1 mcardlegannon.com McArdle Gannon 10 * -14Associates, Inc, TEST BORING LOG BORING MGA -2 (MW) Engineers & Consultants PROJECT: Proposed Septic System - 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster, MA MGA NO.: W1007 CLIENT: Luke's Super Liquors SHEET NO.: I of 2 CONTRACTOR: Geosearch Inc. LOCATION N : See Plan E: GRO DWATER DEPTH Ifxl EQUIPMENT ASING A&uja CORE Water . Casing Hole Type HSA Split Spoon -- ELEVATION: 15'± DATE START : 05/23/2023 END • 05/23/2023 DRILLER: Chris Stamos ENGINEER: Robert Drown Date Time 05/23/23 8:40am 74 8 Size I.D. 4-1/4" 1-3/8" -- 05/23/23 11:35am 6.8 MW Hammer Wt. -- 140# --- - Hammer Fall - 30. -- Depth Sampler low ler Sample I Well in Strata BPF DepthSamp Number/ Re ogle at on/ FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Schematic Feet Change (Drill) Pers" Range Type eryRe Depth min/ftl RQD% ft ins °ftl 0 10 S-1 0.0 14 14.7! -ASPHALT- 12 1.5 0.3 -,1 edium dense, brown to dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, lift/ - 12 13.5 (+) Silt, little fine Gravel. 12 _ 6 1.5 ' - -FILL- I S -1A 1.5 2.0 Light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace (+) Silt. 8 S-2 ! 10 Light brown, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt. 5 2.0 12.0 -SAND-_ _ 3 _ _ 8 - 3'0 6 3.0 _ _ Olive -brown, fine to medium SAND and SILT, trace fine S -2A 6 3.0 Gravel. s S-3 4.0- .05 _l 16 I Loose, olive -brown, fine SAND and SILT, trace (-) fine Gravel. 4.0 - - 3 4 6.0 ff. 4 6 6.0 12 -oose, moist to wet, olive -brown, fine SAND and SILT, trace (- 5 S-4 I 4 8.0 fine Gravel. f �# - 5 -SAND & SILT- 5 ', .a 22 Loose to medium dnese, wet, olive -brown, SILT and fine „' .• 4 S-5 8.0 5 10.0 SAND. 9 - 5 5 5 20 Loose, wet, olive -brown, SILT and fine SAND .' S-6 10.0 4 12.0 4 7 3.0 '1 12 _ S-7 12.0 24 12.0 Medium dense, wet, brown to reddish -brown, fine to medium 8 10 14.0 SAND, trace Silt. 12 16- - - - -SAND- r•' - I' 0.0 15 rr S-8 - 15.0 6 15.0 _ Gray -brown, wet, fine SAND and SILT, trace fine Gravel. 5 = - S -8A 15.5-,l'12 -0.5 ` -SAND & SILT- - 5 - - 6 15.5 15.5 Medium dense, wet, brown to reddish -brown, fine to medium 7 17.0 SAND, trace Silt. - BLOWS/FT. DENSITY BLOWSIFT. CONSISTENCY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY F-= - S - Split Spoon Overburden: 0 - 4 Very Loose 0 - 2 Very Soft 4-10 Loose 10-30 Medium Dense 2-4 Soft 4 - 8 Medium Stiff T - Thin Wall Tube Rock: U - Undisturbed Piston Samples: 30-50 Dense 8-15 Stiff - C - Diamond Core 50+ Very Dense 15-30 Very Stiff - W Wash Sample BORING MGA -2 (MW) 30+ Hard 300 Oak Street, Suite 460 Pembroke, MA 02359 1 Telephone 781.826.0040 1 Fax 781 735.0418 1 mcardlegannon.com *vid"ALFAM McArdle Gannon Associates, Inc. TEST BORING LOG BORING MGA-2 (MW) Engineers & Consultants PROJECT: Proposed Septic System - 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster, MA MGA NO.: W1007 CLIENT: Luke's Super Liquors SHEET NO.: 2 of 2 Depth in Feet Strata Change Case BPF (Drill) Imin/ftl Sampler Blows Per 6" RQD% Sample Number/ Type,ft) Sample Depth Range Sample ery ery tin Elev- Depth Depth ft FIELD CLASSIFICATION AND REMARKS Well Schematic 18 . -SAND- 2 S-9 20.0 _g.s Gray, wet, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt. 1 . 20-5. _6 18 20.5 Very soft to soft, wet, gray, SILT & CLAY S-9A 21 1 20.5 1 22.0 -SILT & CLAY- 24 -10.0 — — ::: S-10 25.0 25.0 Very loose, wet, gray, fine to medium SAND, little Silt. WOR 12 WOHY12 27.0 -SAND- : -12.0 _. 27 _ — - _ 27.0 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 27 FEET 30 33 36 BLOWS/FT. DENSITY BLOWS/FT. CONSISTENCY SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY - S - Split Spoon Overburden: 0 - 4 Very Loose 0 - 2 Very Soft 4-10 Loose 2 - 4 Soft - T - Thin Wall Tube Rock: 10-30 Medium Dense 4-8 Medium Stiff - U - Undisturbed Piston Samples: 30-50 Dense 50+ Very Dense 8-15 Stiff 15-30 Very Stiff - C - Diamond Core W - Wash Sample BORING MGA-2 (MW) 30+ Hard 300 Oak Street, Suite 460 Pembroke, MA 02359 1 Telephone 781.826.0040 1 Fax 781.735.0418 1 mcardlegannon.com KEY TO SYMBOLS Symbol Description Symbol Description Strata s-,-��.L1_jols U silica sand, blank PVC ® Asphalt slotted pipe w/ sand Fill ❑ end of well installation U Sand Silty Sand / Sand & Silt Silt & Clay Soil Sam: lers Split Spoon Monitor Well Details flush -mount cover protective casing R' set in concrete assorted cuttings bentonite pellets INotes: 1. Geosearch, Inc. of Sterling, Massachusetts performed the test borings on May 23, 2023 using a truck mounted drill rig equipped with a 140 -pound automatic trip hammer. 2. Test boring elevations were estimated from ground surface contours shown on a plan entitled "Proposed Septic Repair Plan," dated March 29, 2023, by Bracken Engineering, Inc. Elevations should be considered approximate. 3. MGA observed and logged the test borings. 4. 'WOR' = Wei -ht of Rods- 'WOH' = Wei -:ht of Hammer MassDEP �A LIEVAL L PATRICK Governor TIMOTHY P. MURRAY Ueuten�:nt Governor Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Poston, MA 02108 • b17-2925500 RICHARD K SULLIVAN JR, Secretary KENNETH L. KIMMELL Commissioner REVISION OF APPROVAL FOR REMEDIAL USE Pursuant to Title 5, 310 CMR 15.00 Name and Address of Applicant: Bio-Microbics, Inc. 8450 Cole Parkway Shawnee, KS 66227 Trade name of technology and models: MicroFASTO Treatment System Models MicrOFASTO 0. 5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0; HighStrengthFASTO Treatment System Models HighStrength FASTO 1. 0, 1. 5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0 and NitriFASTO Treatment System Models NitriFASTO 0. 5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0 (hereinafter called the "System"). Schematic Drawings illustrating each System, a design and installation manual, an owner's manual, an operation and maintenance manual, and an inspection checklist are part of this Approval. Transmittal Number: W 072367 Date of Issuance: June 16, 2006 (modified January 23, 2008) Revision date: November 05, 2012 Authority for Issuance Pursuant to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code, 310 CMR 15.000, the Department of Environmental, Protection hereby issues this Approval for Remedial Use to: Bio-Microbics, Inc.,8450 Cole Parkway, Shawnee, KS 66227, (hereinafter "the Company"), approving the System described herein for Remedial Use in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The sale, design, installation, and use of the System are conditioned on compliance by the Company, the Designer, the Installer, the Service Contractor, and the System Owner with the terms and conditions set forth below. Any noncompliance with the terms or conditions of this Approval constitutes a violation of 310 CMR 15.000. David Ferris, Director Wastewater Management Program, Bureau of Resource Protection November 05. 2012 Date This information is available in alternate format. Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem, Diversity Director, at 617-292-5751. TDD# 1-866-539-7622 or 1-617-574-6868 MassDEP Website: www.mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper Bio-Microbics, Inc. - MicroFASTO, HighStrengthFASTO, NitriFASTO Revision of Approval for Remedial Use Revision Date: November 05, 2012 Page 2 of 3 Technology Description The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU). The Systems, MicroFASTR 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0, and HighStrengthFASTR 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0, and, NitriFAST® 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 9.0 units are installed in a tank or tanks having a primary settling zone and an aerobic biological zone. Solids settle in the primary settling zone that is quiescent. In the aerobic zone, the sewage is continually agitated and aerated. Bacteria in the sewage attach to the surface of a submerged plastic media; they reproduce by consuming the organic material in the sewage. Conditions of Approval The term "System" refers to the STU in combination with the other components of an on-site treatment and disposal system that may be required to serve a facility in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000. The term "Approval" refers to the technology -specific Special Conditions, the conditions applicable to all STU's with Remedial Use Approval, the General Conditions of 310 CMR 15.287, and any Attachments. For Secondary Treatment Units that have been issued Remedial Use Approval for the upgrade or replacement of an existing failed or nonconforming system., the Department authorizes reductions in the effective leaching area (3 10 CMR 15.242), the depth to groundwater (3 10 CMR 15.212), and/or the depth of naturally occurring pervious material (3 10 CMR 15.240(1)) subject to the conditions that apply to all Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use and subject to the Special Conditions applicable to the Technology. Special Conditions 1. The System is Secondary Treatment Unit Approved for Remedial Use. In addition to the Special Conditions contained in this Approval, the System shall comply with all the "Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use", except where stated otherwise in these Special Conditions. 2. The System is approved for facilities where the local approving authority finds that: a) there is no increase in the actual or proposed design flow; b) the System is for the upgrade of a failed, failing or nonconforming system; and c) a conventional system with a reserve area, designed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255, cannot feasibly be built on-site. biomicro. doc Bio-Microbics, Inc. - MicroFASTO, HighStrengthFASTO, NitriFASTO Revision of Approval for Remedial Use Revision Date: November 05, 2012 Page 3 of 3 3. The MicroFASTO 0.5, 0.75 and 0.9, HighStrengthFASTO 1.0 and NitriFASTO 0.5, 0.75 and 0.9 are installed in the second compartment of a two-compartment tank with a total liquid capacity of at least 1,500 gallons constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.226. 4. The MicroFASTO, HighStrengthFASTO and NitriFASTO 1.5 are installed in the second compartment of a two compartment 3,000 -gallon tank constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.226. 5. The MicroFASTO, HighStrengthFASTO and NitriFASTO 3.0, 4.5, and 9.0 units are installed in a separate tank constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.226. The units are located between a standard Title 5 septic tank, designed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.223 and 15.224, and the soil adsorption system (SAS). 6. Access shall be provided to all tanks in the primary settling and aerobic biological zones in accordance with 310 CMR 15.228 (2). The primary settling tank shall have at least three manholes with readily removable impermeable covers of durable material provided at grade. Two manholes, over the inlet and outlet of the primary settling tank, shall have a minimum opening of 20 inches. All access ports and manhole covers shall be installed and maintained at grade to allow for maintenance of the System. biomicro.doc MassDEP Charles D. Baker Governor Karyn E. Polito Lieutenant Governor Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmen-tzl Affairs Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street Boston, MA 021013 • F617 292-550n Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units Approved for Remedial Use Last Revision Date: November 30, 2016 Matthew A. Beaton Secretary Martin Suuberg Commissioner A Secondary Treatment Unit (STU) is an alternative technology that may be used as a component of an on-site sewage disposal system where soil or site conditions make conventional soil absorption systems more costly to construct or infeasible. A conventional system may be more costly to construct or infeasible where there is a shallow water table and/or limited area for the siting of a conventional system. As compared to a conventional system, in certain instances, an STU provides for higher loading rates (smaller leaching area) and may require less land area, potentially less fill, and less disturbance of the site. The System consists of an STU designed to reduce the organic material and solids in the wastewater which reduces the demand for treatment in the soil absorption system. A conventional septic tank precedes the STU unless exempt by the Special Conditions for a specific Technology. The use of an STU in accordance with this Approval for Remedial Use requires, among other things: • A Disclosure Notice in the Deed to the property (3 10 CMR 15.287(10)) (A Deed Notice template is available from the Department); • Certifications by the Designer and the Installer (3 10 CMR 15.021(3)); • A Massachusetts certified operator who has received training for the technology and is under contract for periodic inspection and maintenance (310 CMR 15.287(10)); • Periodic sampling, recordkeeping, and reporting, in accordance with this Approval; • Notification within 24 hours by the System Owner to the local approving authority of any System failure; • When pumping is required to discharge to the SAS, 24-hour emergency wastewater storage capacity above the elevation of the high level alarm; and • System Owner Acknowledgement of Responsibilities, in accordance with this Approval. This information is available in alternate format. Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem, Diversity Director, at 617-292-5751. TTY# MassRelay Service 1-800-439-2370 MassDEP Website: www. mass.gov/dep Printed on Recycled Paper Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 2 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 Definitions and References: The term "System" refers to the STU in combination with the other components of an on-site treatment and disposal system that may be required to serve a facility in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000. The term "Approval" refers to these Standard Conditions applicable to all STU's with Remedial Use Approval, the Special Conditions contained in the Technology -specific Approval, the General Conditions of 310 CMR 15.287, and any other Attachments. The Conditions contained herein MUST be read in conjunction with any Special Conditions that are Technology -specific. I. Purpose Approval for Remedial Use allows the use of the Alternative System only where the local Approving Authority finds that the Alternative System is for the upgrade or replacement of an existing failed, failing or nonconforming system with a design of flow of less than 10,000 gpd, where there is no increase in the actual or proposed design flow, and where a conventional system with a reserve area, designed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255, cannot feasibly be built on-site. 2. The sale, design, installation, and use of the System shall be subject to these requirements for any system that submits a complete Disposal System Construction Permit (DSCP) application after the effective date of these Standard Conditions. Existing Systems and Systems for which a complete DSCP application was submitted prior to the effective date of these requirements shall not be subject to the design and installation requirements, however, the System Owner, the Service Contractor, and the Company shall be subject to all other requirements contained herein. With the other applicable permits or approvals that may be required by 310 CMR 15.000, the Approval authorizes the installation and use of the Alternative System in Massachusetts. Except those provisions that specifically have been varied by this Approval, the provisions of 310 CMR 15.000, including the General Conditions of 310 CMR 15.287, apply to the sale, design, installation, and use of the System. 4. Unless stated otherwise in the Special Conditions that apply to a specific Technology, all the conditions contained in this document shall apply to secondary treatment units which have obtained Remedial Use Approval. (Special Conditions may be more or less stringent than the requirements of this document.) Provided that the local Approving Authority approves the Alternative System in conformance with the Department's Technology Approval, Department review and approval of the site-specific System design and installation is not required unless the Department determines on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to its authority at 310 CMR 15.003(2)(e), that the proposed System requires Department review and approval. Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 3 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 II. Design and Installation Requirements 1. Effluent BODS, TSS and pH - The effluent discharge concentrations from the Secondary Treatment Unit to the SAS shall not exceed secondary treatment standards of 30 mg/L BODS and 30 mg/L TSS and the effluent pH range shall be 6.0 to 9.0. 2. The Designer shall be a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer or a Massachusetts Registered Sanitarian, including when designing systems for repair, provided that such Sanitarian shall not design a system with a discharge greater than 2,000 gallons per day. 3. Except where the Approval specifically states otherwise, the Alternative System shall be installed in a manner which does not intrude on, replace, or adversely affect the operation of any other component of the subsurface sewage disposal system designed and constructed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.200 - 15.279. 4. Except where the Approval specifically states otherwise, the Alternative System shall include a properly sized and constructed septic tank, designed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.223 — 15.229, connected to the building sewer and followed in series by the Technology and the SAS; Alternative Design Standards - Provided that the Designer demonstrates that the impact of the proposed Alternative System has been considered and the design requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 have been varied to the least degree necessary so as to allow for both the best feasible upgrade within the borders of the lot and the least effect on public health, safety, welfare and the environment, the local approving authority may allow any combination of the following alternative design standards without the need for granting a variance under 310 CMR 15.400 or obtaining Department approval: a) If a reduction in the size of the SAS is necessary, the size of the SAS may be reduced up to 50 percent from the effective leaching area required when using the loading rates for gravity systems of 310 CMR I5.242(1)(a) for Systems sited in soils with a percolation rate of 60 minutes or less per inch, or for soils with a recorded percolation rate of between 60 and 90 minutes per inch, the loading rates of 310 CMR 15.245(4). (Alternatively, the effluent loading rates provided in 310 CMR 15.242(1)(b) for pressure distribution may be utilized, however, no reduction in the effective leaching area may be taken when using these loading rates, as stated in the regulation.); and/or b) If a reduction in the depth to groundwater required by 310 CMR 15.212 is necessary, the depth to groundwater may be reduced by up to 2 feet, resulting in a minimum separation distance of two feet in soils with a recorded percolation rate of more than two minutes per inch and three feet in soils with a recorded percolation rate of two minutes or less per inch, measured from the bottom of the soil absorption system to the high groundwater elevation; and/or c) If a reduction in the depth of the naturally occurring pervious material layer is necessary, a proposed reduction of up to 2 feet may be allowed in the four feet of naturally occurring pervious material layer required by 310 CMR 15.240(l) provided Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 4 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 that it has been demonstrated that no greater depth in naturally occurring pervious material can be met anywhere on the site. 6. Any proposed reduction in the required depth to groundwater, specified in 310 CMR 15.212, may only be approved when: a) An approved Soil Evaluator who is a member or agent of the local Approving Authority determines the high groundwater elevation; b) No reduction is granted under LUA for setbacks from public or private wells, bordering vegetated wetlands, surface waters, salt marshes, coastal banks, certified vernal pools, water supply lines, surface water supplies or tributaries to surface water supplies, or drains which discharge to surface water supplies or their tributaries, is allowed; and c) In accordance with 310 CMR 15.212(2), for systems with a design flow of 2,000 gpd or greater, the separation to high groundwater as required by 310 CMR 15.212(1) shall be calculated after adding the effect of groundwater mounding to the high groundwater elevation as determined pursuant to 310 CMR 15.103(3). 7. The Alternative Design Standards for effective leaching area, depth to groundwater, and depth of naturally occurring pervious material contained in the Department's Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Unit Approved for Remedial Use shall not be made less stringent by the local Approving Authority under the LUA provisions of 310 CMR 15.405 or under the variance procedures of 310 CMR 15.411. The local Approving Authority may vary other design requirements under the LUA provisions of 310 CMR 15.405 or under the variance procedures of 310 CMR 15.411. 8. Except those allowed under LUA and the Approval, any further deviation from the siting and design requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 for the remedial use of a Secondary Treatment Unit shall require the following: a) The applicant may propose the use of a Bottomless Sand Filter (BSF) as the means of on-site effluent disposal in conjunction with a Secondary Treatment Unit. The installation and use of the BSF must be in accordance with the conditions of the Remedial Use Approval issued by the Department for the BSF; and/or b) The applicant may request the approving authority to grant a variance. 9. The proposed use of a Secondary Treatment Unit Approved for Remedial Use shall be subject to the following: a) the approved record drawings, on file with the local approving authority, shall clearly indicate an area for the best feasible upgrade that could be installed to replace the proposed System, including the STU, in the event that the proposed System fails or it is determined that it is not capable of providing equivalent environmental protection; b) the installation of the proposed System shall not disturb the site in any manner that would preclude the future installation of the best feasible upgrade that could be installed to replace the proposed System. Components of the proposed System may Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 5 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 be sited in an area for the future installation of the best feasible upgrade, provided that it does not render the area unusable for a potential future upgrade; and c) except for the installed SAS, the System Owner shall not construct any permanent buildings or structures in the area for the best feasible upgrade that could be installed to replace the proposed System and the System Owner shall not disturb the site in any other manner that would preclude the future installation of the best feasible upgrade. 10. When identifying the best feasible upgrade that could be installed to replace the proposed System, the Designer shall consider these options in the following order: a) a conventional system designed in accordance with the standards of 310 CMR 15.100 through 15.255 that can be built feasibly, with the exception of providing a reserve area (15.248); b) a conventional system that can only be built feasibly under a Local Upgrade Approval (LUA); c) where a conventional system cannot be built feasibly under a LUA, a Bottomless Sand Filter, in conjunction with an STU; d) where a System can only be built feasibly with variances, a System that has been demonstrated to vary the design requirements of 310 CMR 15.000 to the least degree necessary and have the least effect on public health, safety, welfare and the environment (the System may be an Alternative System with variances); or e) a tight tank. 11. For the upgrade or replacement of an existing failed or nonconforming system in a nitrogen sensitive area (NSA), as defined in 310 CMR 15.215, Systems serving facilities with actual or design flows of 2,000 GPD or greater must include treatment with a Recirculating Sand Filter (RSF) or equivalent technology, as required by 310 CMR 15.202(1). Secondary Treatment Units with Remedial Use Approval are not approved as an RSF equivalent technology and shall not be installed in a NSA, as defined in 310 CMR 15.215, to serve facilities with actual or design flows of 2,000 GPD or greater. (The technology may also have a separate approval for nitrogen reduction, but must be installed under that approval, when appropriate.) 12. Except for septic tank covers which are not required to be at grade, the frames and covers of the other access manholes and ports of the System components shall be watertight, made of durable material, and shall be installed and maintained at grade, to allow for necessary inspection, operation, sampling and maintenance access. Manholes brought to final grade shall be secured to prevent unauthorized access. No structures which could interfere with performance, access, inspection, pumping, or repair shall be located directly upon or above the access locations. 13. Any System structures with exterior piping connections located within 12 inches of or lower than the Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater elevation shall have the connections made watertight with neoprene seals or equivalent. Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 6 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 14. All System control units, valve boxes, distribution piping, conveyance lines and other System appurtenances shall be designed and installed to prevent freezing. 15. The System control panel including alarms and controls shall be mounted in a location always accessible to the operator (or service contractor). When pumping is required to discharge to the SAS, the System shall be equipped with sensors and high-level alarms to protect against high water due to pump failure, pump control failure, loss of power, system freeze ups, or backups. Emergency storage shall be required when pumping to discharge is employed, including pressure distribution. Emergency storage capacity for wastewater above the high level alarm shall be provided equal to the daily design flow of the System and the storage capacity shall include an additional allowance for the volume of all drainage which may flow back into the System when pumping has ceased. 16. System malfunction alarms or high water alarms shall be readily visible and audible for the facility occupants and the Service Contractor and the alarms shall be connected to circuits separate from the circuits serving operating equipment and pumps. 17. The System shall not include any relief valve or outlet for the discharge of wastewater to prevent flooding of the system, back up or break out. 18. In compliance with 310 CMR 15.240(13), a minimum of one (1) inspection port shall be provided within the SAS consisting of a perforated four inch pipe placed vertically down to the elevation of the SAS interface with the underlying unsaturated pervious soils to enable monitoring for ponding. The pipe shall be capped with a screw type cap and accessible to within three inches of finish grade. (A locking cap at -grade is preferred for annual inspection.) 19. Upon submission of an application for a Disposal System Construction Permit (DSCP), the Designer shall provide to the local Approving Authority: a) proof that the Designer has satisfactorily completed any required training by the Company for the design and installation of the Technology; b) for any proposed non-residential System or any residential System with a design flow 2,000 GPD or greater, certification by the Company as specified in Paragraph V.3; c) certification by the Designer that the design conforms to the Approval, any Company Design Guidance, and 310 CMR 15.000; and d) a certification, signed by the Owner of record for the property to be served by the Technology, stating that the property Owner: i) has been provided a copy of the Approval, the Owner's manual, and the Operation and Maintenance manual and the Owner agrees to comply with all terms and conditions; ii) has been informed of all the Owner's estimated costs associated with the operation including, when applicable: power consumption, maintenance, sampling, recordkeeping, reporting, and equipment replacement; Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 7 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 iii) understands the requirement for a service contract; iv) agrees to fulfill his responsibilities to provide a Deed Notice as required by 310 CMR 15.287(10) and the Approval; v) agrees to fulfill his responsibilities to provide written notification of the Approval to any new Owner, as required by 310 CMR 15.287(5); vi) if the design does not provide for the use of garbage grinders, the restriction is understood and accepted; and vii) whether or not covered by a warranty, the System Owner understands the requirement to repair, replace, modify or take any other action as required by the Department or the local Approving Authority, if the Department or the local Approving Authority determines that the Alternative System is not capable of meeting the performance standards. 20. The System Owner and the Designer shall not submit to the local Approving Authority a DSCP application for the use of a Technology under this Approval, if the Approval has been revised, reissued, suspended, or revoked by the Department prior to the date of application. The Approval continues in effect until the Department revises, reissues, suspends, or revokes the Approval. 21. The System Owner shall not authorize or allow the installation of the System other than by a locally approved Installer and, if required by the Company, a person certified or trained by the Company to install the System. 22. Prior to the commencement of construction, the System Installer must certify in writing to the Designer, the local Approving Authority, and the System Owner that (s)he is a locally approved System Installer and, if required by the Company, is certified by or has received appropriate training by the Company. 23. The Installer shall maintain on-site, at all times during construction, a copy of the approved plans, the Owner's manual, the O&M manual, and a copy of the Approval. 24. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance by the local Approving Authority, the System Installer and Designer must provide, in addition to the certifications required by 310 CMR 15.021(3), certifications in writing to the local Approving Authority that the System has been constructed in compliance with the terms of the Approval. 25. The Department has not determined that the performance of the System will provide a level of protection to public health and safety and the environment that is at least equivalent to that of a sanitary sewer system. If it is feasible to connect a new or existing facility to the sewer, the Designer shall not propose an Alternative System to serve the facility and the facility Owner shall not install or use an Alternative System. When a sanitary sewer connection becomes feasible after an Alternative System has been installed, the System Owner shall connect the facility served by the System to the sewer within 60 days of such feasibility and the System shall be abandoned in compliance with Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Revised November 30, 2016 Page 8 of 18 310 CMR 15.354, unless a later time is allowed in writing by the Department or the local Approving Authority. III. Operation and Maintenance, Effluent Quality, Monitoring, and Inspection 1. From start up and thereafter, the System Owner and Service Contractor shall be responsible for the proper operation and maintenance of the System in accordance with this Approval, the Designer's O&M requirements, the Company's O&M requirements, and the requirements of the local Approving Authority. The System Owner and Service Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with the sampling, monitoring, and inspection requirements. Any inspection, operation, maintenance, or monitoring requirements remain in effect until the conditions are modified, terminated, or superseded by a new Approval. 2. To ensure proper operation and maintenance (O&M) of the System, the System Owner shall enter into an O&M Agreement with a qualified Service Contractor whose name appears on the Company's current list of Service Contractors and has been certified, at a minimum, at Grade Level II (two) by the Board of Registration of Operators of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, in accordance with Massachusetts regulations 257 CMR 2.00. 3 The System shall comply with the following monitoring requirements and effluent limits. The required O&M Agreement with the Service Contractor shall include the following monitoring schedule, at a minimum, subject to modifications that may be required by Paragraphs III.8.a)and 8.b): �'arame{er Monitoring Sample I„ocation ] ffluent reiFuenCN TNpe I _ L,imats See pH frequency grab effluent to SAS 6 to 9 specified below See _ turbidity frequency measure effluent of < 40 NTU specified treatment unit below See _ Measure and settleable frequency effluent of record ml/l solids specified measure treatment unit only below See Record color frequency visual effluent of observation specified observation treatment unit only below y Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Revised November 30, 2016 Page 9 of 18 iarameter nitoring P e Location Fff ue uencF� _ See dissolved frequency measure effluent of > 2 m g/1 oxygen (D.O.) specified treatment unit — below Depth of once every Inspection port to See Paragraph Ponding year measure bottom of SAS III.10 Within SAS Thickness of Septic tank or floating Once every other process Pump out, as grease/scum 3 years measure tank where solids necessary layer are retained Depth of Septic tank or Sludge and Once every other process Pump out, as distance to 3 years measure tank where solids necessary effluent are retained tee/filter/outlet 4. An individual household shall be monitored at least once every 12 months (exclusive of alarm responses or other maintenance visits). 5. Facilities (residential and nonresidential) with a design flow of less than 2,000 gpd, other than an individual household, shall be monitored a minimum of twice/year with a minimum of 5 months since the last monitoring inspection (exclusive of alarm responses or other maintenance visits) and a maximum of 7 months between monitoring inspections. 6. Facilities (residential and nonresidential) with a design flow of 2,000 gpd or greater shall be monitored quarterly not less than 2 months since the last monitoring inspection (exclusive of alarm responses or other maintenance visits) and not more than 4 months between monitoring inspections. 7. For Systems that include a Bottomless Sand Filter (BSF) for effluent disposal, the monitoring requirements shall be as specified in the BSF Remedial Use Approval. 8. Systems installed under this Remedial Use Approval shall be subject to the following Performance Requirements: a) Whenever field tests indicate a pH outside the specified range, an exceedance of the turbidity limit, or D.O. below the desired minimum, the Service Contractor shall make adjustments and/or repairs to the System, as deemed necessary during the inspection, and collect an effluent sample for laboratory analysis for BODS and TSS, b) For an individual household, if laboratory analyses indicate an exceedance of 30 mg/L BODS or 30 mg/L TSS, the Service Contractor shall conduct a follow-up inspection and field-testing within 180 days of the original inspection date. Should the follow-up field-test indicate a pH outside the specified range, an exceedance of Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 10 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 the turbidity limit, or D.O. below the desired minimum, the Service Contractor shall make adjustments and/or repairs to the System, as deemed necessary during the inspection, and collect another effluent sample for laboratory analysis for BODS and TSS; and c) Whenever two consecutive monitoring rounds for any Secondary Treatment Unit include at least one exceedance of the limits for BODS or TSS, the System Owner shall be responsible for submitting to the local Approving Authority, within 90 days of the second exceedance of the limits for BODS or TSS, a written evaluation with recommendations for changes in the design, operation, and/or maintenance of the System. The written evaluation with recommendations shall be prepared by the Service Contractor or a Designer and the submission shall include all monitoring data, inspection reports, and laboratory analyses since the last annual report to the local Approving Authority. Recommendations shall be implemented, as approved by the local Approving Authority, in accordance with an approved schedule, provided that all corrective measures are implemented consistent with the limitations described in Paragraph IV.9. Each time an Alternative System is visited by a Service Contractor the following shall be recorded, at a minimum: a) date, time, air temperature, and weather conditions; b) observations for objectionable odors; c) observations for signs of breakout of sanitary sewage in the vicinity of the Alternative System, which indicate a failure of the Alternative System; d) depth of ponding within the SAS, if measured e) identification of any apparent violations of the Approval; f) since the last inspection, whether the system had been pumped with date(s) and volume(s) pumped; g) sludge depth and scum layer thickness, if measured; h) when responding to alarm events, the cause of the alarm and any remedial steps taken to address the alarm and to prevent or reduce the likelihood of future similar alarm events; i) field testing results when performed as part of the site visit; j) samples taken for laboratory analysis, if any; k) any cleaning and lubrication performed; 1) any adjustments of control settings, as recommended or deemed necessary; m) any testing of pumps, switches, alarms, as recommended or deemed necessary; n) identification of any equipment failure or components not functioning as designed; o) parts replacements and reason for replacement, whether routine or for repair; and p) further corrective actions recommended, if any. Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 11 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 10. Whenever an SAS inspection port measurement indicates the ponding level within the SAS is above the invert of the distribution system, an additional measurement shall be made 30 days later. If the subsequent reading indicates the elevation of ponding within the SAS is above the invert of the distribution system, the System Owner shall be responsible for submitting to the local Approving Authority, within 60 days of the follow up inspection, a written evaluation with recommendations for changes in the design, operation, and/or maintenance of the System. The written evaluation with recommendations shall be prepared by the Service Contractor or a Designer and the submission shall include all monitoring data, inspection reports, and laboratory analyses for the previous year. Recommendations shall be implemented, as approved by the local Approving Authority, in accordance with an approved schedule, provided that all corrective measures are implemented consistent with the limitations described in Paragraph IV.9. 11. Unless directed by the local Approving Authority to take other action, the System Owner shall immediately cease discharges or have wastewater hauled off-site, if at any time during the operation of the Alternative System the system is in failure as described in 310 CMR 15.303 (1)(a)1 or 2, backing up into facilities or breaking out to the surface. IV. Additional System Owner and Service Contractor Requirements The System Owner shall not install, modify, upgrade, or replace the System except in accordance with a valid DSCP issued by the local Approving Authority which covers the proposed work. 2. Prior to commencement of construction of the System and after recording and/or registering the Deed Notice required by 310 CMR 15.287(l 0), the System Owner shall provide to the local Approving Authority a copy of: a) a certified Registry copy of the Deed Notice bearing the book and page/or document number; and b) if the property is unregistered land, a Registry copy of the System Owner's deed to the property, bearing a marginal reference on the System Owner's deed to the property. The Notice to be recorded shall be in the form of the Notice provided by the Department. 3. Prior to signing any agreement to transfer any or all interest in the property served by the System, or any portion of the property, including any possessory interest, the System Owner shall provide written notice, as required by 310 CMR 15.287(5) of all conditions contained in the Approval to the transferee(s). Any and all instruments of transfer and any leases or rental agreements shall include as an exhibit attached thereto and made a part of thereof a copy of the Approval for the System. The System Owner shall send a copy of such written notification(s) to the local Approving Authority within 10 days of giving such notice to the transferee(s). Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 12 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 4. The System Owner and Service Contractor shall properly operate and maintain the System in accordance with the Approval, the Designer's O&M requirements, the Company's O&M requirements and the requirements of the local Approving Authority. 5. Prior to commencement of construction of the System, the System Owner shall provide to the local Approving Authority a copy of a signed O&M Agreement that meets the requirements of Paragraph IV.6. 6. The System Owner and the Service Contractor shall maintain on-site, at all times, a copy of the approved plans, the Owner's Manual, the O&M Manual, a copy of the Approval, and a copy of the O&M Agreement. The O & M agreement shall be at least for one year and include the following provisions: a) The name of a Service Contractor who meets the qualifications specified in the Approval; b) The Service Contractor must inspect the Alternative System as required by the Approval; c) The Service Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining lab analyses and submitting the monitoring results to the System Owner and the local Approving Authority in accordance with the reporting requirements; and d) In the case of a System failure, an equipment failure, alarm event, components not functioning as designed, or violations of the Approval, procedures and responsibilities of the Service Contractor and System Owner shall be clearly defined for corrective measures to be taken immediately. The Service Contractor shall agree to provide written notification within five days, describing corrective measures taken, to the System Owner, the local board of health, and the Company. 7. The Service Contractor shall notify the System Owner of any changes to the terms and conditions of the Approval within 60 days of any changes. 8. Within one year of any changes to the terms and conditions of the Approval, the System Owner shall amend, as necessary, the O&M Agreement required by Paragraph IV.6 to reflect the changes to the terms and conditions of the Approval. 9. In the case of a System failure, an equipment failure, alarm event, components not functioning as designed, components not functioning in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, or violations of the Approval, the Service Contractor shall provide written notification within five days, describing corrective measures taken, to the System Owner, the local board of health, and the Company and may only propose or take corrective measures provided that: a) all emergency repairs, including pumping, shall be in accordance with the limitations and permitting requirements of 310 CMR 15.353; b) the design of any repairs or upgrades are consistent with the Alternative System Approval; Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 13 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 c) the design of any repairs or upgrades requiring a DSCP shall be performed by an individual meeting the qualifications of Paragraph I1.2; d) the installation of any repairs or upgrades requiring a DSCP shall be done by an Installer with a currently valid Disposal System Installers Permit, in accordance with 310 CMR 15.019 and the Installer shall also comply with Paragraph 1I.22. The System Owner shall also be responsible for ensuring written notification is provided within five days to the local board of health. 10. The System Owner shall provide access to the site for the Service Contractor to perform inspections, maintenance, repairs, responding to alarm events, field testing, and sampling as may be required by the Approval. 11. At a minimum, the Service Contractor shall inspect, properly operate, and properly maintain the System: a) any time there is System failure, equipment failure, or an alarm event; b) in accordance with the O&M manual and Designer requirements; c) in accordance with the requirements of the local Approving Authority; and d) in accordance with the Approval. 12. The Service Contractor shall collect samples, if required by the Approval, and obtain analysis results from an approved laboratory, perform any required field testing, and submit results to the System Owner with the O&M report and inspection checklist within 60 days of the site visit. The O&M report and inspection checklist shall include, at a minimum, any required wastewater analyses, any required flow data, and all the information required to be recorded for a maintenance inspection of an Alternative System. 13. The System Owner and the Service Contractor shall maintain copies of any wastewater analyses, wastewater flow data, field testing results, the Service Contractor's O&M reports, inspection checklists, and all reports and notifications to the local Approving Authority for a minimum of three years. 14. Upon determining that the System is in violation of the Approval or the System has failed, as defined in 310 CMR 15.303, the Service Contractor shall notify the System Owner immediately. 15. Upon determining that the System has failed, as defined in 310 CMR 15.303, the System Owner and the Service Contractor shall be responsible for the notification of the local Approving Authority within 24 hours of such determination. 16. In the case of a System failure, an equipment failure, violations of the Approval, an alarm event, or components not functioning as designed or in accordance with the Company specifications, the Service Contractor shall provide written notification to the Company within five days describing proposed corrective measures or corrective measures taken. Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 14 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 17. Violations of the BOD5, TSS, or pH in the System effluent shall not constitute a failure of the System for the purposes of 24-hour notification or 5 -day written reporting as required in provisions applicable to all Alternative Systems. Breakout constitutes a failure of the System. If breakout occurs, the Service Contractor and System Owner shall comply with the 24-hour notification or 5 -day written reporting provisions applicable to all Alternative Systems. 18. By March 1st of each year, the System Owner and the Service Contractor shall be responsible for submitting to the local Approving Authority all O&M reports, all monitoring results, and inspection checklists completed by the Service Contractor during the previous calendar year. 19. The System Owner and the Service Contractor shall provide written notification to the local Approving Authority within seven days of any cancellation, expiration or other change in the terms and/or conditions of a required O&M Agreement with a Service Contractor. The Service Contractor shall provide written notification to the Company within seven days of any cancellation, expiration or other change in the terms and/or conditions of a required O&M Agreement with a System Owner. 20. By March 1 st of each year, the Service Contractor shall be responsible for submitting to the Company copies of all O&M reports including alarm event responses, all monitoring results, violations of the Approval, inspection checklists completed by the Service Contractor, notifications of system failures, and reports of equipment replacements with reasons during the previous calendar year. 21. To determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, or suspending the Approval or to determine whether the conditions of the Approval have been met, the System Owner shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the System, within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 22. The Approval shall be binding on the System Owner and on its agents, contractors, successors, and assigns, including but not limited to the Designer, Installer, and Service Contractor. Violation of the terms and conditions of the Approval by any of the foregoing persons or entities, respectively, shall constitute violation of the Approval by the System Owner unless the Department determines otherwise. V. Company Requirements The Approval shall only apply to model units with the same model designations specified in the Technology Approval and meet the same specifications, operating requirements, and plans, as provided by the Company at the time of the application. Any proposed modifications of the units, installation requirements, or operating requirements shall be subject to the review of the Department for inclusion under a modification of the Approval. The Designer shall be responsible for the selection of the appropriate model unit except, for systems of 2,000 gpd or more and nonresidential systems, the Company Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 15 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 shall be responsible for verification of the appropriate model unit as part of the review of proposed installations under a Remedial Use Approval. 2. Prior to submission of an application for a DSCP, the Company shall provide to the Designer and the System Owner: a) All design and installation specifications and requirements; b) An operation and maintenance manual, including: i) an inspection checklist; ii) recommended inspection and maintenance schedule; iii) monitoring (i.e. water use and power consumption) and sampling procedures, if any; iv) alarm response procedures, if any, and troubleshooting procedures; c) An owner's manual, including alarm response procedures, if any; d) Estimates of Owner's costs associated with the operation including, when applicable: power consumption, maintenance, sampling, recordkeeping, reporting, and equipment replacement; e) A copy of the Company's warranty; and f) Lists of qualified Service Contractors and, if training is required, qualified Designers and Installers. Prior to the submission of an application for a DSCP, for all nonresidential Systems and Systems with design flows of 2,000 gpd or greater, the Company shall submit to the Designer and the System Owner, a certification by the Company or its authorized agent that the design conforms to the Approval and all Company requirements and that the proposed use of the System is consistent with the Technology's capabilities. The authorized agent of the Company responsible for the design review shall have received technical training in the Company's products. 4. The Company shall maintain programs of training and continuing education for Service Contractors. Training shall be made available at least annually. If the Company requires trained Designers or Installers, the Company or its authorized agent shall institute programs of training and continuing education that is separate from or combined with the training for Service Contractors. The Company or its authorized agent shall maintain, annually update, and make available by February 15th of each year, lists of Service Contractors and, if certification or training is provided by the Company, Designers and Installers. The Company or its authorized agent shall certify that the Service Contractors and, if training is required, Designers and Installers on the lists have taken the appropriate training and passed the Company's training qualifications. The Company or its authorized agent shall further certify that the Service Contractors on the list have submitted to the Company all the reports required by Paragraphs IV. 16, 19, and 20. The Company or its authorized agent shall not re -certify a Service Contractor if the Service Contractor has not complied with the reporting requirements for the previous year. Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 16 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 5. If training is required, the Company shall not sell the Technology to an Installer unless the Installer is trained to install the System by the Company. The Company shall require, by contract, that distributors and resellers of the Technology shall not sell the Technology to an Installer unless the Installer is trained to install the System by the Company. 6. As part of the required training programs for Designers, Installers, and Service Contractors, the Company shall provide each trainee with a copy of this Approval with the design, installation, O&M, and owner's manuals that were submitted as part of the Approval. The Company shall provide, in printed or electronic format, the System design, installation, O&M, and Owner's manuals, and any updates associated with this technology Approval, to the System Owners, Designers, Installers, Service Contractors, vendors, resellers, and distributors of the System. Prior to publication or distribution in Massachusetts, the Company shall submit to the Department for review a copy of any proposed changes to the manual(s) with reasons for each change, at least 30 days prior to issuance. The Company shall request Department approval for any substantive changes, as stated in Paragraph V.8. Prior to publication or distribution in Massachusetts, when substantive changes in the design, installation, operation, or maintenance of the System may be outside the limits of this Approval and may require a modification of this Approval or may be the basis for a separate Approval, the Company shall request approval by the Department. 9. Prior to its sale of any System that may be used in Massachusetts, the Company shall provide the purchaser with a copy of this Approval with the System design, installation, O&M, and Owner's manuals. In any contract for distribution or sale of the System, the Company shall require the distributor or seller to provide the purchaser of a System for use in Massachusetts with copies of these documents, prior to any sale of the System. 10. To determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, or suspending the Approval or to determine whether the conditions of the Approval have been met, the Company shall furnish the Department any information that the Department requests regarding the Technology within 21 days of the date of receipt of that request. 11. Within 60 days of issuance by the Department, the Company shall provide written notification of changes to the Approval to all Service Contractors servicing existing installations of the Technology and all distributors and resellers of the Technology. 12. The Company shall provide written notification to the Department's Director of the Wastewater Management Program at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer of ownership of the Technology for which the Approval is issued. Said notification shall include the name and address of the proposed owner containing a specific date of transfer of ownership, responsibility, coverage and liability between them. Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 17 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 13. The Company shall maintain copies of: a) the Approval; b) the installation manual specifically detailing procedures for installation of its System; c) an owner's manual, including alarm response procedures, if any; d) an operation and maintenance manual, including: i) an inspection checklist; ii) recommended inspection and maintenance schedule; iii) monitoring requirements and recommendations(including water use and power consumption when required) and sampling procedures; iv) alarm response procedures, if any, and troubleshooting procedures. e) estimates of the operating costs provided to the Owner, including, when applicable: power consumption, maintenance, sampling, recordkeeping, reporting, and equipment replacement; f) a copy of the Company's warranty; and g) lists of trained Service Contractors and, if training or certification is required, Designers and Installers. 14. The Company shall maintain the following information for the Systems installed in Massachusetts: a) the address of each facility where the Technology was installed, the Owner's name and address (if different), the type of use (e.g. residential, commercial, institutional, etc.), the design flow, the model installed; b) the installation date, start-up date, current operational status; c) the name of the Service Contractor, noting any cancellations or changes to any Service Contracts; d) a summary of system failures, system malfunctions, and violations of the Approval with the date of each event and corrective actions taken to reach compliance, including but not limited to: design changes; installation changes; operation/maintenance changes; monitoring changes; and/or changes in roles and responsibilities for the manufacturer, vendors, designers, installers, operators, and owners; and e) copies of all Service Contractor records submitted to the Company, including all O&M reports with alarm event responses, all monitoring results, inspection checklists completed by the Service Contractor, notifications of system failures, and reports of equipment replacements with reasons. All of the information required by this Paragraph shall be maintained by Company and shall be made available to the Department within 30 days of a request by the Department. 15. The Approval shall be binding on the Company and its officers, employees, agents, contractors, successors, and assigns, including but not limited to dealers, distributors, and resellers. Violation of the terms and conditions of the Approval by any of the foregoing Standard Conditions for Secondary Treatment Units for Remedial Use Page 18 of 18 Revised November 30, 2016 persons or entities, respectively, shall constitute violation of the Approval by the Company unless the Department determines otherwise VI. General Requirements 1. Any System for which a complete DSCP Application is submitted while the Approval is in effect, may be permitted, installed, and used in accordance with the Approval, unless and until: a) the Department issues modifications or amendments to the Approval which specifically affect the installation or use of a System installed under the Approval for the System; or b) the Department, the local approval authority, or a court requires the System to be modified or removed or requires discharges to the System to cease. 2. All notices and documents required to be submitted to the Department by the Approval shall be submitted to: Director Wastewater Management Program Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street - 5th floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 The Department may suspend, modify or revoke the Approval for cause, including, but not limited to, noncompliance with the terms of the Approval, non-payment of any annual compliance assurance fee, for obtaining the Approval by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts or any change in or discovery of conditions that would constitute grounds for discontinuance of the Approval, or as necessary for the protection of public health, safety, welfare, or the environment, and as authorized by applicable law. The Department reserves its rights to take any enforcement action authorized by law with respect to the Approval and/or a System utilizing the Technology against the Company, a Designer, a System Owner, an Installer, and/or Service Contractor. Towle of BREwsTER OFFICE OF i*y 1657 MAIN STREET CONSERVATION COMMISSION o � o - BREWSTER, MA 02631 r„ PHONE: (508) 896-4546 ExT 4242 wgj afton a,brewster-ma.jov Luke Brewster Realty Trust [Delivered by:_Hand 15 Lower Road [Date: January 30, 2024,____j Brewster, MA 02631 Attention: Arthur N. Luke RE: Order of Conditions (OOC)/WPA Form 5 — SE9-1965 9-15 Lower Road Assessors Map 37, Parcel 1 Dear Mr. Luke: The Order of Conditions (OOC)/WPA Form 5 for the above property, issued by the Brewster Conservation Commission is attached, along with a copy for your records. Prior to the commencement of the approved work, the original Order of Conditions must be recorded at the Barnstable Country Registry of Deeds. Evidence of the recording is to be provided to the Conservation Administrator. (X) If checked, an As -Built Plan, signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer or registered professional land surveyor must be submitted to the Conservation Administrator along with the Request for Certificate of Compliance/WPA Form 8A submittal. { ) If checked, an Elevation Certificate certified by a registered professional engineer or registered professional land surveyor must be included with the Request for Certificate of Compliance/WPA Form 8A submittal. Upon completion of the approved work, a Request for Certificate of Compliance/WPA Form 8A shall be submitted to the Conservation Administrator. The final Certificate of Compliance/WPA Form 8B is necessary to remove the lien(s) placed on the property title as recorded at the Registry of Deeds. Certificates will be issued after a satisfactory site visit and review of the submitted documentation that confirms substantial completion of the project per the Order of Conditions, any subsequent Amendments and/or Extensions and a ratification vote of the Brewster Conservation Commission at a duly posted Public Meeting. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact me at (508) 896-4546 ext. 4242 or by email. Rer Ily,sL� r /� Bill Gra''.on Conservation Administrator ATTENTION: YOU HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ONE (1) ORIGINAL AND ONE (1) COPY. THE ORIGINAL SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE BARNSTABLE COUNTRY REGISTRY OF DEEDS. WWW. rO N.BREWSTER.MA.US u Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 0: Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131. §40 Provided by MassDEP: SE9-1965 _ MassDEP File # eDEP Transaction # Brewster Citylrown b. ❑ Amended Order of Conditions Arthur N. Luke a. First Name b. Last Name Important: When filling Luke Brewster Really Trust out forms on c. OrganizaSon the 15 Lower Road _ computer, d. Mailing Address use only the MA tab key to Brewster move your e. City/Town f. State cursor - do not use the 4. Property Owner (if different from applicant): return key. T_ fy a. First Name b. Last Name c. Organization Weis d. Mailing Address e. Cityrrown 5. Project Location: 9-15 Lower Road a. Street Address 37 C. Assessors Map/Plat Number Latitude and Longitude, if known: T State 02631 g. Zip Code g. Zip Code 1 d. Parcel/Lot Number 41 d45m18.18s 70d6m44.21 s d. Latitude e. Longitude wpafonn5.doc • rev 5/18/2020 Page 1 of 13 4 A. General Information Please note: Brewster this form has 1. From: Conservation Commission been modified with added 2. This issuance is for a. ® Order of Conditions space to accommodate (check one): the Registry of Deeds 3. To: Applicant: Requirements Provided by MassDEP: SE9-1965 _ MassDEP File # eDEP Transaction # Brewster Citylrown b. ❑ Amended Order of Conditions Arthur N. Luke a. First Name b. Last Name Important: When filling Luke Brewster Really Trust out forms on c. OrganizaSon the 15 Lower Road _ computer, d. Mailing Address use only the MA tab key to Brewster move your e. City/Town f. State cursor - do not use the 4. Property Owner (if different from applicant): return key. T_ fy a. First Name b. Last Name c. Organization Weis d. Mailing Address e. Cityrrown 5. Project Location: 9-15 Lower Road a. Street Address 37 C. Assessors Map/Plat Number Latitude and Longitude, if known: T State 02631 g. Zip Code g. Zip Code 1 d. Parcel/Lot Number 41 d45m18.18s 70d6m44.21 s d. Latitude e. Longitude wpafonn5.doc • rev 5/18/2020 Page 1 of 13 4 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDE File Fle # WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions i k Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster Citv(Town A. General Information (cont.) 6. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for (attach additional information if more than one parcel): Barnstable a. County b. Certificate Number (if registered land) 2664 276 c. Book d. Page 12/2112023 1/09/2024 1/3012024 7. Dates: a. Date Notice of Intent Filed b. Date Public Hearing Closed c. Date of Issuance s. Final Approved Plans and Other Documents (attach additional plan or document references as needed): Proposed Septic Re2air Plan _ a. Plan Tide Bracken Engineering, Inc. Alan Grady, RPLS & Zachary Babinski, b. Prepared By RPE 1/11/2024 1 "=20' _ d. Final Revision Date e. Scale f. Additional Plan or Document Tide g. Date B. Findings i. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above -referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing, this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act (the Act). Check all that apply: c. ®Prevention of a. El Public Water Supply b. ® Land Containing Shellfish Pollution d. ❑ f. ®Protection of Private Water Supply e. ® Fisheries Wildlife Habitat g. ® Groundwater Supply h. ® Storm Damage Prevention I. ® Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project, as proposed, is: (check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: a. ® the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. wpaform5.doc • rev 5/18/2020 Page 2 of 13 0 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: SE9-1965 Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File # WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Ll Vegetated Wetland Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 # eDEP Transaction # c. square feet Brewster 6. ❑ Land Under City/Town B. Findings (cont.) Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect the interests of the Act, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the performance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the Act's interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). 3. ® Buffer Zone Impacts: Shortest distance between limit of project 41 disturbance and the wetland resource area specified in 310 CMR 10.02(1)(a) a. linear feet Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 4. ❑ Bank a. linear feet b. linear feet c. linear feet d. linear feet 5. ❑ Bordering _ Vegetated Wetland a. square feet b. square feet c. square feet d. square feet 6. ❑ Land Under _ _ Waterbodies and a. square feet b. square feet c. square feet d. square feet Waterways e. c/y dredged f. cly dredged 7. ❑ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding a. square feet b. square feet c. square feet d. square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage e. cubic feet f. cubic feet g. cubic feet h. cubic feet 8. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a. square feet b. square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c. cubic feet d. cubic feet e. cubic feet f. cubic feet 9. ❑ Riverfront Area a. total sq. feet b. total sq. feet Sq ft within 100 ft c. square feet d. square feet e. square feet f. square feet Sq ft between 100- _ 200 ft g. square feet h. square feet i. square feet j. square feet wpaform5_doc • rev 511812020 Page 3 of 13 4 0 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands SE9-1965 _ MassDEP File # Ll WPA Form 5 -- Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster City/Town B. Findings (cont.) Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 1o. ❑ Designated Port Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below Areas 11. ❑ Land Under the Ocean 12. ❑ Barrier Beaches 13. ❑ Coastal Beaches 14. ❑ Coastal Dunes 15. ❑ Coastal Banks 16. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores 17. ❑ Salt Marshes 18. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds 19. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish 20. ❑ Fish Runs 21. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 22. ® Riverfront Area Sq ft within 100 ft Sq ft between 100- 200 ft a. square feet b, square feet c. c/y dredged d. c/y dredged Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below _ _ cu yd cu yd a. square feet b. square feet c. nourishment d. nourishment cu yd cu yd a. square feet b. square feet c. nourishment d. nourishment a, linear feet b. linear feet a. square feet b. square feet a. square feet b. square feet c. square feet d. square feet a. square feet b. square feet c. c!y dredged d. c/y dredged a. square feet b_ square feet c. square feet d. square feet Indicate size under Coastal Banks, Inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above dredged b. c/y dredged a. square feet b. square feet 7,6747,674 a. total sq. fee_t b. total sq. feet 783 783 _ c. square feet d. square feet_ e. square feet f. square feet 6,891 6,891 g. square feet _ h. square feet i. square feet j. square feet wpaform5.doc • rev 5/18/2020 Page 4 of 13 4 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions i r Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) " #23. If the 23 project is for the purpose of restoring or enhancing a wetland resource area 24• in addition to the square footage that _. has been C. entered in Section B.5.c ❑ Restoration/Enhancement'`: a, square feet of BWV ❑ Stream Crossing(s): a. number of new stream crossings b. square feet of salt marsh Provided by MassDEP: SE9-1965 MassDEP File # eDEP Transaction # Brewster dity/Town b. number of replacement stream crossings General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (Bvw) or The following conditions are only applicable to Approved projects. 13.17.c (Salt Marsh) above, 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other please enterregulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. the additional g ry amount here. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. The work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. The time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the extension date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. c. If the work is for a Test Project, this Order of Conditions shall be valid for no more than one year. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. An Order of Conditions for a Test Project may be extended for one additional year only upon written application by the applicant, subject to the provisions of 310 CMR 10.05(11)(f). 6. If this Order constitutes an Amended Order of Conditions, this Amended Order of Conditions does not extend the issuance date of the original Final Order of Conditions and the Order will expire on 1/30/2027 unless extended in writing by the Department. 7. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill. Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. vvpaform5.doc • rev 5/18/2020 Page 5 of 13 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands SE9-1965 i WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions MassDEP File # Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # — Brewster Cityrrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 8. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 9. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. The recording information shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 10. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection" [or, "MassDEP"] "File Number SE9-1965 " 11. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before MassDEP. 12. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPA Form 8A) to the Conservation Commission. 13. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 14. Any change to the plans identified in Condition #13 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 15. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 16. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. wpaform5.doc • rev 5118/2020 Page 6 of 13 17. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. 19. The work associated with this Order (the "Project') (1) ❑ is subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards (2) ® is NOT subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards If the work is subject to the Stormwater Standards, then the project is subject to the following conditions: a) All work, including site preparation, land disturbance, construction and redevelopment, shall be implemented in accordance with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit as required by Stormwater Condition 8. Construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices (BMPs) shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. b) No stormwater runoff may be discharged to the post -construction stormwater BMPs unless and until a Registered Professional Engineer provides a Certification that: L all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification. For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation, recharge, and/or treatment, the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures; ii, as -built final construction BMP plans are included, signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, certifying the site is fully stabilized; iii. any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed, as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10; wpaform5.doc • rev 511812020 Page 7 of 13 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP- SE9-1965 Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File # WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions ' 5 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster CityTrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) 17. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 18. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. 19. The work associated with this Order (the "Project') (1) ❑ is subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards (2) ® is NOT subject to the Massachusetts Stormwater Standards If the work is subject to the Stormwater Standards, then the project is subject to the following conditions: a) All work, including site preparation, land disturbance, construction and redevelopment, shall be implemented in accordance with the construction period pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation control plan and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit as required by Stormwater Condition 8. Construction period erosion, sedimentation and pollution control measures and best management practices (BMPs) shall remain in place until the site is fully stabilized. b) No stormwater runoff may be discharged to the post -construction stormwater BMPs unless and until a Registered Professional Engineer provides a Certification that: L all construction period BMPs have been removed or will be removed by a date certain specified in the Certification. For any construction period BMPs intended to be converted to post construction operation for stormwater attenuation, recharge, and/or treatment, the conversion is allowed by the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook BMP specifications and that the BMP has been properly cleaned or prepared for post construction operation, including removal of all construction period sediment trapped in inlet and outlet control structures; ii, as -built final construction BMP plans are included, signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, certifying the site is fully stabilized; iii. any illicit discharges to the stormwater management system have been removed, as per the requirements of Stormwater Standard 10; wpaform5.doc • rev 511812020 Page 7 of 13 4 iv. all post -construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans (including all planting plans) approved by the issuing authority, and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition; v. any vegetation associated with post -construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. c) The landowner is responsible for BMP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another party has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance. Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance, or Partial Certificate of Compliance, the responsible party (defined in General Condition 18(e)) shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement ("O&M Statement) for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ("O&M Plan") and certifying the following: L) the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance, and ii.) the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post -construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Multi -Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility, the landowner, or owner of any drainage easement, assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP. To overcome this presumption, the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record, acceptable to the issuing authority, evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP, and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 18(f) through 18(k) with respect to that BMP. Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 18(f) through 18(k) with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance. In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot, the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs. A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement. f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance with the design plans, the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. wpaform5.doe • rev 511812020 Page 8 of 13 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands SE9-1965 MassDEP File # WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions _ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster City/Town C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) iv. all post -construction stormwater BMPs are installed in accordance with the plans (including all planting plans) approved by the issuing authority, and have been inspected to ensure that they are not damaged and that they are in proper working condition; v. any vegetation associated with post -construction BMPs is suitably established to withstand erosion. c) The landowner is responsible for BMP maintenance until the issuing authority is notified that another party has legally assumed responsibility for BMP maintenance. Prior to requesting a Certificate of Compliance, or Partial Certificate of Compliance, the responsible party (defined in General Condition 18(e)) shall execute and submit to the issuing authority an Operation and Maintenance Compliance Statement ("O&M Statement) for the Stormwater BMPs identifying the party responsible for implementing the stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan ("O&M Plan") and certifying the following: L) the O&M Plan is complete and will be implemented upon receipt of the Certificate of Compliance, and ii.) the future responsible parties shall be notified in writing of their ongoing legal responsibility to operate and maintain the stormwater management BMPs and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. d) Post -construction pollution prevention and source control shall be implemented in accordance with the long-term pollution prevention plan section of the approved Stormwater Report and, if applicable, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Multi -Sector General Permit. e) Unless and until another party accepts responsibility, the landowner, or owner of any drainage easement, assumes responsibility for maintaining each BMP. To overcome this presumption, the landowner of the property must submit to the issuing authority a legally binding agreement of record, acceptable to the issuing authority, evidencing that another entity has accepted responsibility for maintaining the BMP, and that the proposed responsible party shall be treated as a permittee for purposes of implementing the requirements of Conditions 18(f) through 18(k) with respect to that BMP. Any failure of the proposed responsible party to implement the requirements of Conditions 18(f) through 18(k) with respect to that BMP shall be a violation of the Order of Conditions or Certificate of Compliance. In the case of stormwater BMPs that are serving more than one lot, the legally binding agreement shall also identify the lots that will be serviced by the stormwater BMPs. A plan and easement deed that grants the responsible party access to perform the required operation and maintenance must be submitted along with the legally binding agreement. f) The responsible party shall operate and maintain all stormwater BMPs in accordance with the design plans, the O&M Plan, and the requirements of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. wpaform5.doe • rev 511812020 Page 8 of 13 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: SE9-1965 }..-- Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File # I WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions ti Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster Cityrrown C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (cont.) g) The responsible party shall: 1. Maintain an operation and maintenance log for the last three (3) consecutive calendar years of inspections, repairs, maintenance and/or replacement of the stormwater management system or any part thereof, and disposal (for disposal the log shall indicate the type of material and the disposal location); 2. Make the maintenance log available to MassDEP and the Conservation Commission ("Commission") upon request; and 3. Allow members and agents of the MassDEP and the Commission to enter and inspect the site to evaluate and ensure that the responsible party is in compliance with the requirements for each BMP established in the O&M Plan approved by the issuing authority. h) All sediment or other contaminants removed from stormwater BMPs shall be disposed of in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, i) Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system as defined in 310 CMR 10.04 are prohibited. j) The stormwater management system approved in the Order of Conditions shall not be changed without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. k) Areas designated as qualifying pervious areas for the purpose of the Low Impact Site Design Credit (as defined in the MassDEP Stormwater Handbook, Volume 3, Chapter 1, Low Impact Development Site Design Credits) shall not be altered without the prior written approval of the issuing authority. 1) Access for maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of BMPs shall not be withheld. Any fencing constructed around stormwater BMPs shall include access gates and shall be at least six inches above grade to allow for wildlife passage. Special Conditions (if you need more space for additional conditions, please attach a text document): See Specia Conditions 20. For Test Projects subject to 310 CMR 10.05(l 1), the applicant shall also implement the monitoring plan and the restoration plan submitted with the Notice of Intent. If the conservation commission or Department determines that the Test Project threatens the public health, safety or the environment, the applicant shall implement the removal plan submitted with the Notice of Intent or modify the project as directed by the conservation commission or the Department. wpafonn5.doc - rev 5118/2020 Page 9 of 13 4 D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance 1. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2. The Brewster hereby finds (check one that applies): Conservation Commission a. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: _Code _of the Town of Brewster 172 1. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2. Citation Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. b. ® that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: Code of the Town of Brewster _1772 1. Municipal nce or Bylaw 2. Citation 3. The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows (if you need more space for additional conditions, attach a text document): See S ecial Conditions wpaform5.doc • rev 5118/2020 Page 10 of 13 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands SE9-1965 MassDEP File # WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster LL I City/Town D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance 1. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? ® Yes ❑ No 2. The Brewster hereby finds (check one that applies): Conservation Commission a. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw, specifically: _Code _of the Town of Brewster 172 1. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw 2. Citation Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. b. ® that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: Code of the Town of Brewster _1772 1. Municipal nce or Bylaw 2. Citation 3. The Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with the following conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows (if you need more space for additional conditions, attach a text document): See S ecial Conditions wpaform5.doc • rev 5118/2020 Page 10 of 13 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 E. Signatures This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special condition pursuant to General Conditions #4, from the date of issuance. Please indicate the number of members who will sign this form. This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. Provided by MassDEP: SE9-196_5_ MassDEP File_ #_ eDEP Transaction # Brewster City/Town _I i�r 1. IMLA & issuance 2. Number of Signers The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested) or hand delivered to the applicant. A copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office, if not filing electronically, and the property owner, if different from applicant. Brewster Conservation Commission Signature Signature Signature by hand delivery on Date Mike Tobin, Chair Printed Name Cased Chatelain, Vice Chair Printed Name Bruce Evans Printed Name Gats Kaser Printed Name _Kimberl_ey Crocker Pearson Printed Name Ron Slowek Printed Name Steve McKenna Printed Name Printed Name ❑ by certified mail, return receipt requested, on Date Page 11 of 13 wpefortn5.doc • rev 511812020 rd Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: SE9-1965 �-. Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File # WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 eDEP Transaction # Brewster City/Town F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions. The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the Department's Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being - appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c. 131, § 40), and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. wpaform5.doc - rev 5/1812020 Page 12 of 13 A. i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection LlBureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands NAPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 G. Recording Information 4 Provided by NlassDEP: SE9-1965 MassDEP File # eDEP Transaction # Brewster CitylTown Prior to commencement of work, this Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions. The recording information on this page shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed below. Brewster T Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. To: Brewster _ Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the Project at: 9-15 Lower Road, Brewster, MA SE9-1965 _ Project Location MassDEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: Barnstable T County Book for: Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaction is: Document Number Signature of Applicant Page wpaf0rm5.d00 - rev 5/18/2020 Page 13 of 13 f Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number. Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Request for Departmental Action Fee - Provided by DEP Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. Request Information 1. Location of Project a. Street Address b. Cityfrown, Zip c. Check number d. Fee amount 2. Person or party making request (if appropriate, name the citizen group's representative): Name Mailing Address Cityrrown State Zip Code Phone Number r Fax Number (if applicable) 3. Applicant (as shown on Determination of Applicability (Form 2), Order of Resource Area Delineation (Form 413), Order of Conditions (Form 5), Restoration Order of Conditions (Form 5A), or Notice of Non -Significance (Form 6)): Name Mailing Address CitylTown Phone Number 4. DEP File Number - B. Instructions State Zip Code — Fax Number (if applicable) 1. When the Departmental action request is for (check one): ❑ Superseding Order of Conditions — Fee: $120.00 (single family house projects) or $245 (all other projects) ❑ Superseding Determination of Applicability — Fee: $120 ❑ Superseding Order of Resource Area Delineation — Fee: $120 wpaformUor • rev. 4122!2020 Page 7 of 2 4 LLIMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Request for Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Instructions (cont.) DEP File Number: Provided by DEP Send this form and check or money order, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to: Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 2. On a separate sheet attached to this form, state clearly and concisely the objections to the Determination or Order which is being appealed. To the extent that the Determination or Order is based on a municipal bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appellate jurisdiction. 3. Send a copy of this form and a copy of the check or money order with the Request for a Superseding Determination or Order by certified mail or hand delivery to the appropriate DEP Regional Office (see hulas://www.mass.=ov/service-details/massdoE-regional-offices-b-r-communilw). 4. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. wpaform5.doc • rev. 4/22/2020 Page 2 of 2 % Addendum to WPA Form 5 Lukes Liquors, 9-15 Lower Road; Order of Conditions SE9-1965; Assessors Map 37, Parcel 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. C.131 S. 40) And Code of the Town of Brewster Chapter 172 Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law (BWP By-law) Project Description: The approved work includes the removal of an existing septic system and replacement with a new Title V compliant system including a secondary treatment system. The project includes areas within 50 & 100 feet of inland wetland resources and riverfront. A Variance under the Brewster Wetlands Protection Bylaw and Regulations for work within the 50 -foot setback has been approved. Resource Area Identification The affected resource areas under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. Ch.131 §. 40) are Bordering Vegetated Wetland (310 CMR 10.55) and Riverfront (310 CMR 10.58). The affected resource area under the Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law (Chapter 172) are Vegetated Wetland (Brewster Wetland Regulations 3.02) Interests Protected Under the Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law Wildlife Fisheries Shellfish Erosion and Sedimentation Control Groundwater and Groundwater Quality Flood Control Storm Damage Prevention Prevention of Pollution Aesthetics Performance Standards Implicated by Proposed Project under Mass. Wetlands Protection Act and Wetland Regulations: Bordering Vegetated Wetland, 310 CMR 10.55 and 310 CMR 10.58 Local Performance Standards Implicated by Proposed Project under Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law and Wetlands Regulations: Vegetated Wetland, 3.02 Findings under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and Wetland Regulations: The Brewster Conservation Commission finds that the project can be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. See Special Conditions below. Findings under Brewster Wetlands Protection Bylaw and Wetlands Regulations: The Brewster Conservation Commission finds that the project can be conditioned to comply with the Brewster Wetlands Protection Bylaw and Regulations. See Special Conditions below. Portions of the proposed work are within 50 & 100 feet of Vegetated Wetlands. Lukes Liquors, 9-15 Lower Road, Order of Conditions SE 9-1965 Findings/ Special Conditions 1 14 Vegetated Wetlands, 3.02: Portions of the proposed work are located within 100 feet of Vegetated Wetlands. The Conservation Commission finds that the project can be conditioned so it will not impair the vegetated wetlands' ability to perform any of the functions set forth in Section 3.02(1). The Brewster Conservation Commission finds that the project can be conditioned to comply with the Brewster Wetlands Protection Bylaw and Regulations. See Special Conditions below. Portions of the proposed work are within 50 feet of a Vegetated Wetland. Sections 3.02 of the Brewster Wetlands Protection Regulations require a variance from the regulations granted pursuant to Section 5.01 of the regulations. A variance may be granted only for the following reasons and upon the following conditions: a) 1) mitigating measures are proposed that will allow the project to be conditioned so that it contributes to the protection of the resource values identified in the Wetlands Bylaw, and 2) the Conservation Commission finds no reasonable alternative for such a project within the proposed site; and 3) there will be no adverse impact from the proposed project; or b) that the project is necessary to accommodate an overriding public interest or that it is necessary to avoid a decision that so restricts the use of property that it constitutes an unconstitutional taking without compensation. The Brewster Conservation Commission finds that mitigating measures have been proposed that will allow the project to be conditioned so that it contributes to the protection of the resource values identified in the Wetlands By-law. The mitigating measures include removal of an existing septic system from a previously disturbed area and replacement with Title V compliance replacement system and secondary treatment system providing additional protection of the resource areas. The Conservation Commission finds that the proposed project is a reasonable alternative. The Brewster Conservation Commission finds that the project can be conditioned so there are no adverse impacts from the proposed project to the interests protected by the Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law. The Brewster Conservation Commission finds that variance criteria b), that the project is necessary to accommodate an overriding public interest or that it is necessary to avoid a decision that so restricts the use of property that it constitutes an unconstitutional taking without compensation." does not apply to this project. For the above stated reasons, the Conservation Commission grants a variance to Sections 3.02 & 3.04 of the Brewster Wetlands Protection Bylaw Regulations. Special Conditions under the Mass. Wetlands Protection Act and Wetlands Regulations and under the Brewster Wetlands Protection Bylaw and Wetlands Regulations: The Brewster Conservation Commission hereby finds that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with performance standards set forth in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and Wetland Regulations and the Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law. Lukes Liquors, 9-15 Lower Road, Order of Conditions SE 9-1965 2 Findings/ Special Conditions c. The Conservation Commission orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said additional conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. Al. All local, state and federal approvals shall be obtained for this project before work can commence. Copies of all approvals shall be forwarded to the Brewster Conservation Commission. A2. This permit is granted under Section 172-7 of the Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law, subject to the conditions imposed, for a period of three years from the issuance date of the original Order of Conditions. The Conservation Commission may issue extensions, each for a period up to three years, based on review of the site and other criteria. Requests for each extension shall be submitted in writing, no less than 30 days prior to the expiration date. This Order of Conditions shall expire on January 30, 2027. A3. The Agent or other employee, members of the Conservation Commission and officials of the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order, at reasonable hours, to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order. Said persons may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. This right of entry shall remain until such time as a Certificate of Compliance has been issued, recorded in the Registry of Deeds or Land Court, Barnstable County, and returned to the Conservation Department. A4. This order shall apply to any successors and assigns in interest or control and any other person engaging in activity on the property identified in the Notice of Intent. A5. Violation of any of these Conditions shall subject the violator and the landowner to a fine (of not more than $300.00 per day) pursuant to Section 172-11 of the Town of Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law, until all violations have been corrected to the satisfaction of the Brewster Conservation Commission. A6. All work shall be in accordance with the approved plans and documents referenced in A. General Information Item 8 of the WPA Form 5, Order of Conditions/SE9-1965. If any changes are made in the above-described plans which may or will alter an area subject to protection under the Wetlands Protection Act and the Town of Brewster Wetlands Protection By-law, or any changes in activity subject to regulations under G.L. c. 131 §40, or the Town of Brewster local regulations occurs, the applicant shall inquire from this Commission in writing, prior to implementation in the field, whether the change(s) is significant enough to require an Amended Order of Conditions or the filing of a new Notice of Intent. Any errors in the plans or information submitted by the applicant shall be considered changes and the above procedures shall be followed. A7. A copy of this Order of Conditions/Permit shall be kept on site at all times during project activities. This is the owner's responsibility. The owner shall see that all contractors and subcontractors retained during project activities receive a copy of this Order. Workers shall be prepared to produce the Order and all plans and supporting documents referenced in the Order, upon request of the Conservation Agent or any member of the Conservation Commission. A8. Prior to clearing, excavation or construction, an erosion control barrier/limit of work (staked haybales or straw wattles with a silt fence) shall be properly installed and shall constitute the limit of work, as shown on the plan of record. No work shall take place on the wetland side of the barrier. The siltation barrier shall be removed only after any threat of erosion no longer exists, and all disturbed areas are stabilized by vegetation or other means. Any siltation buildup on the upland side shall be removed. Any commencement of work activities prior to the proper Lukes Liquors, 9-15 Lower Road, Order of Conditions SE 9-1965 3 Findings/ Special Conditions % installation of erosion controls and an inspection and approval by the Conservation Commission may result in a cease and desist action, and possible fines of up to $300.00 per day for each day of violation. A9. A supply of extra siltation barriers shall be stored on site for emergency use. A10. After the siltation barrier/limit of work has been set and a minimum of five (5) days before commencement of work, the owner shall notify the Conservation Department using the Owner affirmation of responsibility for work/request for site inspection... form, which shall be signed by the owner of the property as well as the contractor in charge of the work. The Commission's Agent will schedule an on-site meeting of the contractor(s) responsible, to ensure that the requirements of this Order are understood. No work shall begin until after the on-site meeting. At the on-site meeting, the contractor and the Conservation Agent will review access and protocol. During this on-site consultation, the Conservation Agent or Commissioner may require minor modifications to the approved site plan (relating to work/construction methodology) to the Order of Conditions. If so, said conditions will be provided in writing at the time of said on-site meeting. Al 1. Also prior to commencement of project activities, a series of dated color photographs shall be taken of the entire resource area and buffer area, and siltation barrier, and shall include any bank erosion and revegetation area. A set of photographs shall be submitted to the Conservation Department for the applicant's permit file, with the notification form. These photos shall be labeled with the Assessor's Map and Parcel, and street address, date and general view description. Another series of dated color photographs shall be taken of the resource area and buffer area when the work is completed, and fully revegetated and stable. These photographs shall be submitted to the Conservation office at the time a Certificate of Compliance is requested, and shall remain in the applicant's permit file. The photos shall be labeled with the Assessor's Map and Parcel, and street address, date and general view description. Al 2. Heavy equipment or machinery is permitted for the redevelopment of the property to include clearing, grading, drainage improvements, and paving. Al 3. Any debris, fill or excavated material on site shall be stockpiled away from designated wetlands. Unsuitable or excess excavated material shall be properly stabilized or removed from the site. A14. All structures, facilities and equipment, as part of this project, shall be continually operated and maintained so as to comply with this permit. This provision applies specifically to all heavy equipment used on this project. Any leakage of oil, hydraulic fluid, fuel, or any other pollutant shall be cleaned up immediately, and the defective equipment responsible for said leakage shall be immediately repaired or taken off site. Al 5. Mulch shall not be a substitute for groundcover or shrubs in jurisdictional areas. Al 6. Installation of in -ground irrigation systems shall be prohibited within 100 feet of any wetland resource areas. Temporary above ground irrigation systems may be used to establish mitigation plantings. All 7. Exterior lights on any structure shall be directed downward and shielded so the light does not illuminate wildlife habitat in jurisdictional areas. Spotlights and floodlights shall not be installed within the 100 -foot buffer zone of a resource area; nor shall any spotlight or floodlight penetrate a resource area or 100 -foot buffer zone. Lukes Liquors, 9-15 Lower Road, Order of Conditions SE 9-1965 4 Findings/ Special Conditions r Al 8. Any fertilizers used within 100 feet of any wetland resources shall be listed by or comprised of organic ingredients consistent with the United States Department of Agriculture National Organic Program (NOP). Organic fertilizers shall be used in an appropriate manner for the conditions of the subject property, and applied in accordance to the manufacturer's specifications. Al 9. Pesticides, herbicides and fungicides shall be prohibited within 100 feet of any wetlands. A20. Any disturbed slopes on site shall be revegetated with appropriately sized and spaced approved plant species* and stabilized with 100% biodegradable erosion control netting, which shall stay in place after final grading. Other disturbed areas shall be covered with four to six inches of organic topsoil which is free of weed seeds and debris, and planted with appropriately sized and spaced approved plant species' or in accordance with the site/planting plan. All disturbed areas shall be completely revegetated during the first growing season after the permitted work is complete. *Approved plant species, size and spacing are those on the list of acceptable plantings from of the Cape Cod Cooperative Extension ( ). Turf lawn is prohibited within the 100 foot buffer zone to wetlands. Project Completion/Certificate of Compliance A21. A final report, which shall include any affect on the wetland resources shall be submitted following completion of the project and prior to a Request for Certificate of Compliance. A final series of dated color photographs shall be taken of resource and buffer area when the work is completed. These photographs shall be submitted to the Conservation office at the time a Certificate of Compliance is requested, and shall remain in the applicant's permit file. These photos shall be labeled with the Assessor's Map and Parcel, and street address, date and general view description. A22. On completion of the entire project, the applicant or representative shall submit a written request for a Certificate of Compliance on WPA Form 8A - Request for Certificate of Compliance MA WP ACT. The plan of record contains the stamp of a Registered Professional Engineer (PE) and Professional Land Surveyor. It is further required that a written statement by a RPE or PLS certifying substantial compliance with the plan and an "as -built" plan be included. If the plan shows any deviation from the approved plan referenced in A. General Information Item 8 of the WPA Form 5, Order of Conditions/SE9-1965, the RPE or PLS shall describe said deviation in the statement. This form shall be accompanied by payment of a non-refundable fee to the Town of Brewster. Without a Certificate of Compliance which has been recorded (at the Registry of Deeds or Land Court, whichever applies), an encumbrance shall remain on the property, and your filing will not be closed. Lukes Liquors, 9-15 Lower Road, Order of Conditions SE 9-1965 5 Findings/ Special Conditions i WALK-IN ° u STORAGE COOLER m fg-15 LOWER ROAD C EXISTING MIXED USE BATH BUILDING (16,241 S.F.) STORAGE 1ST FLOOR. 4 COMMERCIAL USE I— E o / THRIFT SHOP STORAGERECIEVING WALK-IN (2,190 S.F. I INTERIOR) COOLER COUNTER i DUNKIN DONUTS I LUKE'S (32—SEA TS) CAN/BOTTLE I LIQUORS (2,177 S.F.) REDEMPTION (11,427 S.F. ENTRY CENTER INTERIOR) THRESHOLD - y9 RETAIL AREA I i i gI i WI O I vI i I F. F. E. THRESHOLD EL. =16.73 o« Drowings\Brewster\Lower Rood\9-15 Lower Road (Lukes)\9-15 Lower Rd—Rev 2.dwg EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' STORAGE & LOADING Prepared By. n A 1 UCKEN ENGINEERING, INC..-, 49 HERRING POND ROAD 19 OLD SOUTH ROAD BUZZARDS BAY, MA 02532 NANTUCKET, MA 02554 (tel) 508.833.0070 (tel) 508.325.0044 (fax) 508.833.2282 www.brackeneng.com EXISTING FLOOR PLANS IN BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared For: THE LUKE-BREWSTER REALTY TRUST #9 = #15 LOWER ROAD MAP 37 PARCEL 1 ;. Date: Drawn: Checked: Sheet: JANUARY 30, 2024 RED/BEI I ZLB/DAF 1 of 2 16 .e Deg Aii �"��re*'�Fer�Lswer Road\9-15 Lower Rood (Lukes)\9-15 Lower Rd_Rev 2.dwg EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 20' Prepared By. A E sky ENGINEERING, INC. 49 HERRING POND ROAD 19 OLD SOUTH ROAD BUZZARDS BAY, MA 02532 NANTUCKET, MA 02554 I(tel) 508.833.0070 (fax) 508.833.2282 (tel) 508.325.0044 www.brackeneng.com EXISTING FLOOR PLANS IN BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared For: THE LUKE-BREWSTER REALTY TRUST #9 - #15 LOWER ROAD MAP 37 PARCEL 1 Date: Checked: eet: JANUARY 30, 2024 lDrawn: Sh RED/BEI I ZLB/DAF I 2 of 2 1k f 1 ) r _ rr I 1 r� 4 eft x� C r� SORDE. 0 A TA 7€ ItETL 10 f 1 T ~" rasral� aar r +s as WF AjI FIC - - a ; ?Nf 4 Y fu 4 TFi Adr=�r IAL f IN1 0 a� A 71 t r _ _ L db I PEErol?AT7 ! r. r RNR tec_CA L 1b A5 _ r f d1AAfUAZY 4�'Pl x 4 1-� -` i } VPF 'X6 A$ r ✓ter Gwc k f- fc { 1 t A? IL - } HI: Ai r� r r � �r � f � G% _ 'm -7_ WF Al2 41br .A � F � Y G - r _ Y J 0 PP 400' OP i �,'0 4p - - -/ ! l A � � r 157` FLOC CO iMERCfAL USE LUKE'S { tik 2ND rLOdR_ (3) 1-ao4e1 APARi9<NTS LIOUORS flrsr+r z„sem A+ • rxs7tn a,00 capc,L 54a0(II,41 5.. r ~. } GAS METER SF 7+C 7A+GIC 12 � � #v TERIOR) � + � � j t 4+ i.k L WV. AY Nv rJ.47 S f ( �S 'w r ;, v Ul'T' ±.T�?7�' �a (TO FULAN - 57EE NOTE 1a) 'z FND° _ • - �" REC0WWCT ACCESS HATCH T 1 i (T0 REMda11M# - `,TE fir_ - _ r HATE 15) � EXSA0 6 1,X0 Cot 0rA j!Wt f j $� �AN4C EF �i F -o ;� L # � THRFT SHOP N`'Y. dV 14.i6� 0. 10 57AG 1 i +� N yy-y l i 56, Q Ty L� I i, J. - t4. �V y % %A g f W R FF fA F+ l 8 ( (TCI RE)MI4 - SEE H4TE 18) Y1T 9 ASAP ?'A1�C�L 2� 1N i RI07 J " LMA 7ER FL, 7'9 TER) wo i+t t DL+11f 1N Wcr AST 4-5 ♦ _ y FY75?Nfo 75t7 CA? .`�'7'A( TiiVk !¢r y} o '.s, - y ) ' ♦ 15 D6WUTS 1 dvv #0 1: 1341 � wv M. ?3.85 � - � r Nyv kv 2.' 17.88 � x ��" 1 (TO 1iE]AN►J -SEE NOTE 16j - � � "` �{` (TTS P"AM - . ! c ] l ! l I 4} SEE 1E) - _ i � I � 1 ,� fff� \ d TNS #lE C k " [TCL BE ABANDONED IN PLACE) � k 1 i � � 1 �2OC?' R)V£:4FROJu7 i r ARBA TO RECORD t y 4 L1Ff A O * 1 k tit MFAN F ICH WA IFR } � � .5 � _ " - _ � r �' - _ _ t � F1FNC>-IEA,4RH= l _ 1 ELEV. = 16.73 ("Avo ) , r �ao:�r7 rv7 r s I, t � ► r r s 4 FIRST FL" AT THR�S'101D- �_� IYEL4 t �_-ms kr 1 ly M nuc ft 7� �r � y � A2? � � � � E- - t7af77 '�' ±�i+�'±754'., C.4+y'�°Y -- bF 4(PI�OFECT A5 NECESSAIiIt] V irn.57 ,G 1,400 C.�47. f,4fA3F TRAP . r► r EF75Fd'+ 7�A.+},y JNifJfS f wv aw. 1443 x � ~ CNV cur: 14.7 �x � � (TO BE REMUYED�15� As ~� (T4 REMAIN - SEES - k N SU -M MOTE 23) { 5 ♦ ♦ x _ _ "� u ) 9221 F7C' FUO' 8UF✓ ER F1RDV REC ~+ % `% l *t xx ��� - AREA 7D rifCORD � bfFAA+ NFGN 4YA s NfAM HIGH WA7�0? + � � L) _ 4- - AC ,�0 PA?t1 S ?REST � A4AF 6 FAr REL 4 cr kf }P 5 Pf1RCLL 74 { T MIG hRE � * " ** ,Ot 3 f { 1 T Y 7 PAVEMENT Sik* CUT � A� �'� �x r _ � ZONE +!+ Fz (5EE DETp1L)OX:,� AC CL, 13) Adie ;,.tK�,H. ZONE PARCEL TEIAPCRARY 6' FFGH r �h4if1G - I ALN M. r + wtSTrsuCngfa FEIVNII st * • 4iE%t • _ � GN t aRAOY� (f1NAL LOCATION i0 BE FIELD tik S0' BLUFFER FRESH- I +*c 0773? COOf0NAi>F;11 - ApCM 7D COASTAL BANKmw= mom 6U41IESSES T4 REW1t1 COEH " - ?OD' t3UFFER Fft�O RECORD �' 4 ouFmr, T;OH$tRKTION) UFAN .41rA WATF wF A 000 PRt]POSED ER49uI1 ♦4 � s � � � q � �. - - - � * I, SILTATION CONTROL I t *oo' 8t}FfFR FROM (SEE CETAII.) 1 \ ,. y C0.4STAL BARK l s ! `�'P PROPOSED CATCH BASIN : �� l � . • * 1 \ � _ � � y � � �c PR{11TCTIOH (pETAq.) f f 1� % ! \ w f 55 %% l t # MA�,, ,STREET ROUTE A 1dFAN F,1GN 4t+A iFk 7JF1F77M1NfO FRO.+d 7?fF r 4iVr A t TDP OF 00.*SFAL DANK FRr]Ad r7VlV + - - - - - - - BUZZARDS BA r CWAL ESTUARY Floc: r v 1 FAr }VALL y , ` -N �I� Lfi I?f)At DA I ld VP�f4r_,� S �41• fV 23.60 !4' xkk U 770 7 Pa f 7- / r F. t'OM 611W I -000/1 DIG SAFE PLAID ,F,` , Call: TOLL FREE 8 I� 0 2 3D 40 60 1.888-344.7233 ii��/ Rf tf 1E3OIG-SAFE y CALL 72 HO JR5 9E FORE YOU CIG 1 inch = 20 feet L W. 9x4 tl, f7i9-'.5 Ln FM_Ra 2+e.0 Locus Map Score_ r - _ 500' Dotes 1. BENCHM,1ARI<: ELEVATION = 1.6-73 (NA1tD8& FIRST FLOOR AT THRESHOLD 2- Al... .7CJNSTRLCTIPN MFTHODS AND MAT-ERIALS TO CONFORM TO TITLE 5 AND THE TOWN OF BRMSTER BOARD OF HEALTH RFCLIL ATIONS. .3, ALL SYSTLM CCMIUNLNIS SI TALL EJL MAHKLD N 1 H MAGNErTIi� TAPE OR A COMPARABLE H=ANS IN ORDER -O LOCATE THEM ONCE SuRIED. 4- NO FIELD MODIFLCATION TO THE SYS711s+ SFiALL BE k4ADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OESION ENGINEER AND BOARD OF HEALTH. S. ALL JOINTS AND LAVERS TO IRIr WATERTIGHT, F,. -HE CONTf;AGTDR SPALL BE �ESPONS'eLE FOFt VEPIFYINCa THE ACTUAL L.00A1I01J OF ANY FXiSTING UTILITIES. 7. A CE:Zff CALL OF CA)MPLIANCE MUST 13E OBTAINED PRIp:� TC 13ACICFILLING SYSTEMA, 8. OWNER/APPLICANT! LUKE-BRFW9TFR REALTY TRUST ARTHUR N. LUKE, Truates 1. CARLETON LUKE, Trustee 15 LOWER ROAD BREWSTER. MA 02631 9. DEED REFERENCE: Deed Etk: 2664 Pg: 276 10. PLAN RTYERENCE: Plon Sk-. 404 Pg: 37 11- -HE DESIrN IS INTENDED To MEET TIT E 5 AND OTHER APPLGABLE REQUIREMENTS. THIS PLAN DO=S NOT OUARANIEE 'INA1 IIIL SnILM WIL_ i3L [RtjIALLLU AS UE5lGNED, NOR DOES THIS PLAt4 43;JARANTEE TWE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM - 17.. -HIS SYSTEV IS NOT DESIGNEID NOR INTENDED FOR 415E WITH A GARBAGE GRINDER - 15. -HE SYSTEM OVMER SHAL_ BE RESPONS0LE TO PUMP -HE SEPTIC TANK AT LEAST ONCE EVERY THREE YEARS - 14, LOCUS DOE=S HOT FALL WITHIN A WELLHFAb PROTECTION ARFA. 15. LD(-Alq, PARTIALLY FALLS WITH -N AN t$PESP ESTIMATED HABITAT OF RASE WI DIUFE ANO PRIOR;7Y HABITAT Of RARE SPECIES_ PROI�CT L$ EXEMPT. 10. LOCUS PARTIALLY FALLS W nflN SPECIAL FLOOD HihZARD ZONES "AE" (Et- 14), "AC" OCL. T3) & "VE" ;EL. 'S) AS SHOWN ON F00 FLOOD INSURANCE PATE I AP No. 254010-0413-J date+.? 07116/2014. 17, COP47RACTCR TO COORDINATE WITH. OWNER ON MAINTAIN NG AOt�FSS TO THE SITE DURIIJG CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR 10 COOROINATE ANY -EMPORARY SHUTDOWNS - 18. EXISTING SEPT'C COMPONENTS. INCLUDING 130TF- GREASE TRAPS, BOTH PRWARY SEPTIC TANKS, THE SCCONDAFY SEDTIC TANK ffAICROFAST UNIT, AND PUMP CHAUBER TO BE PUMPED, CLEANED. A14D INSPECTU) F0I4 SIIiUCIURAL INILGHIEY ANp WA1frH JiGH-NESS PRIOR TO THE= START OF ; ONSTRUCTJON, COf4SJLT DESIGN ENGINEER IF ANY DEFECT OR GROLNDWATER FNFILTRATION IS EVIDENT - 1 -4. -HE LOCATON OF UNDERGROUND UTTL'TIES AS 2E�RESf]NTEQ ON T-iESE PLANS IS �A$ED UPCy PLANS AND ;NFORMAllphl PROMDED BY TF -E RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES AN.) MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS SUPP-EUENTEC GY F•IELIJ IDEN7IFICATON WHEREVER POSSt8LE_ N4 WARRANTY IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THESE LOCATIONS OR THAT ALL UNDERC,ROUND UTILITIES ARE S1 -104M. THE CONTRACTOR SFIAL'_ CONTACT DIG SAFE #T LEAST 72 HOURS PRiOR TO THE START Eft C'ONSIRIJU110hL DIG SAFE TELLPHONk NUMULrH IS 1-F3W-,322-4$44, Prepared 8y N 49 HERRING POND ROAD 19 OLD SOUTH ROAD BUZZARDS BAY, MA 02537 NANTUCKET, THA 02554 {tell 50&833-0070 (tell $0X, 125,0044 (fax) 508.03-3„?2E1? www,brackenong.cam EXIST11NG CONDITIONS, DEMOLITION, EROSION CONTROL & SITE PREPARATION PROPOSED SEPTIC REPAIR PLAN IN BREWSTER. MASSACHUSETTS Prepared For: THE LUKE-BREWSTER REALTY THIN 9 - #15 LOWER ROAD MAP 31 PARCEL 1 7 1 fit fps REVSED PER 13014 at CONS17PVATION 2CWMFMdTS RFI1. 1 12/21/23 RFV5-_1) PER EOII & OONSERVATICII; COMMENTS RFC N0.1 Date Revision Description 8 7'B: drawn:Checke'j' Shs� MARCH 29, 2Q23 RED f 4PH %BEI ZLB/DAf 1 0? 3 E r, F IV ED E3F E'117` I �' < HEALTH 01rPARTMENT �- •Qft �40,� /V - 9-15 LOKER ROAD 00 ExisTwo mixfo USE J3UR Dwo (16,241 S.F.) 40 167 FLOOR: CCkWU 'RCYA,L USE 0 _ 00 00 :AaD FL40R_ (.3) 1-BpRA! APARTi11fPV7S do 110 00000 Room ippo �+ � / 'S 5 VAS METER — � � �.5 Y � 5� do 00 � LUKE'S �%% LiQUORS �~ 1 fl?,427 S.F VIL INTERIOR) r 10,00L,mm Pod '40 � 10 1 mpmo 5,Oi0G VENT TO BEN ECTED TO E7� PIPE IN510E �. -- >E•FS?�'IG � P7k7�0 CALr�uty +�+"+&�� 09 • No hYY. NI 2: 12.88 eUtmc HIS! Ak 12.42 rrl _ _ AIV.0f1T: ;! .!I EVSF&V 'It IIMAPfA 0 05 �SF�.E NNOOTF 11J1 INV. ?4.3$ { TO REMAIN -SEE III 18} .50' R?I R pFT RECONSTRUCT ACC. 5 HATCH SMAW - 72, 1 go S. it. ++ TO REiIAIIH -SEE HATE 1 d) FrpAl r3U4V ExISTrIrC 7,St2D G4i .Rr311C THINK (2. Pop 5. i+v v #0 I: 1.161 IN TEP2IORJ 000000 WV.. W �: 11.77 CONSTRUCvT NEW ACCESS � 46L %' ruv. OUr, P3,49 BLOWER UNIT T4 9E MMINTEd HATCH OVER ETC PHwP 1 1-000, (TD RaWAM - SEE NOTE 16) ADJACENT M Ex15T1NG BLOWER Cl1AkIEiER � � �- fQ4nVC Flat UNIT IN51DIE 6LINL TNG MITH WI EL T, I9 EXTMIOR 1111tNG, DUNCPN DONUTS 3�PROPOSED t,5 �-SF.AT.yj r11CROFAST 4 (2- T ;�T aF.) UNIT IN ;,0(M OVS'1IAI 2,560 6A ZP TIC T/AVI 1P GAL TANK ; Avv 8V- ;3.155 EI r,OX GJL CREA3F FRAP fP — go (TD REMAIN - BEE NOTE 1S) IkV.w1443 +k; NF. OUT: ZAPS COFJTRACIQR TO CCMECT TO yr�..'•.,_r (TO REMAIN - SEE SEPTIC NOTE 23)��� EXISTING FORD IMAM i{ Locus MOp ,S001I 7" = 500' m Ln MVI CREEK Oy�R YArIL��sEEK " WARSry [}h R ASI �4 s Note 1- BENCHMARX. ELE]CArI.ONL 18.73 (NAVD88) FIRST FL03R AT THRESHOLD 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS To CONFORM TQ TITLE 5 AND THE TOM%' CF 13REW'STEi� BOARD OF HEALTH REGULATIONS: S. ,+SLI_ SYSIF-M CQMP(I}NENT5 5HALL EaE LARKED WITH MAGNETIC TAPE OR A CiCMPARABLE Mk ANS IN ORDER TO LOCATE "HEIS ONCE BURIED. 4. NO F;ELD MODIFICATION TO TEA[ SYGTELO SRALL eF MADE vaTHOUT PRION WRITTEY APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER A#JD BOARD OF HEALTH. 5. ALL JOINTS AND GQVERS TO BE WATERTIGHT, 6- THE CGNTRACTOR SF -ALL BE REEPONSBLE FDR VERIFYIN3 THE ACTUAL LOCATIOhJ OF ANY EXISTING UTiLITIE$- 7- A CERTIFICA-E OF COMPLIAMCL MUST BIL U131AIMLIJ PRrdR TO BACKFILLING SYSTEM- ti 51' ry ' ;- 51 8- 4VINERAPPUCANi- " F • y LUKE-BREWSTER REALTY TRUST �r-qL S--- 1—f7STPVG �1STGTIGa&BOx ARTHUR N. LUKE. Trustee Ohl S.Tt - (TO 6E 0WAMCNED IN PLACE) I I. CARLETON LUKE, Trustee 15 LOWER + Y ' ~5 S OAD BREWSTER, MA 02631 DEED IiEFEIiENG£: Orad Bk: 2564 Pg! 276 VENT by - 1 Q. PLAN RE`CENCE; Marl Bk. #G4 13g; 37 ��~ , 9FNCrIw'IitLt. it- YHE DESIt;I� 15 'NTENDED TG MEET TITLE 5 AND OTHER tir s ELEV. = `.6,13 (NAVD;M) APPLCABLE REO.IIREMENTS. THIS PLAN DOES NOTFIRST F1L04R AT THRESHOLD k [ SSUAftANILL THAI IHS $Y�;IEM 4MLL U IN51ALLk:} AS %DESIGNED, NOR 005 THIS PLAN GUARANTEE THE - �* Y OPERATION OF ThIE SYSTEM. \ _ yYr'.UF * * BCR::.\ C 12. -HIS SYSTEV IS NOT DESIPhNED NOR INTENDED F'OR USF x t*Gw Pr �. " —I OF RM ±mc GA.I WITH A GAREIAGE GRINPER- S u 'sPITORITyG BA$IN4KI 'n '` * • }1 (PROTECT AS NEOMARY) 111 A .� c x� 1 � c�a —� �- x �' * # *�* � - � � � 13. 'iiE S1I51'EM i}ShN£H SHALw BE, RESPQN�115LE TO PL)i�IP N3 �r'1,� 1 HE SEPTIC TANK AT LEAST ONCE EVERY THREE D-.9bx w x 1 I YEARS- _ N_It* a 1 0 14, LOCUS DOES NOT FALL WTHIN A WELLHEAD - * * * * s * * x � r PROTECTION A4EA, -F } - 15. 1,0MIq PARTIALLY FALLS WITHIN AN NHESP ESTIMATED HABITAT OF RARE WILDLIFE AND PRIORITY HAOITAT OF \ _ * ** * •� r- RARE SPF.41F5. PROJECE I$ EXEMPT. 16. LOCUS PA,RTlALLY RAILS OTHIN 5PCCIAL 1`10017 Nw * � * * { * * • * - HAZARD ZONES "AE" (EL. 14), -AER (EL. 13) & "VE'° * * ifs . (EL. 15) AS SHOWV ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP Na. 25001C-041.3-,] doled 07/165/2014. TOP OF COA3TAL ODER 9 -t FIG. 17. SOIL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DJRIKG EXCAVATION *' * * * ! I MAY DIFFER FROM THE PREVIOUSLY OBSERVED -- CONOFTIQNS Al T> -.E TEST PITS- A;7DITIQNA� REMOVAL PROK300 4'0 * * • * AND REPLACEMENT OF SOIL MAY BE REQUIRED Il 4 SUCH GAL PUMP � s �.' x� * *mss 4 --- } UNDESIRABLE CONDIT10h15 Alit ENL'GUNILKEI}. 'H_ FIAINAFk IL1 PROPi �Ol1TLET D-6000 BOO' RIYERFP Orr'TAREA DESIGN ENGINEER 5HAL, BE CONSUL -ED IF SUCH (H-20 LOAD. 1x7 RELr D ONCITIONS ARE FOUND. � w 01. MEAN F,IIG'Pd WATER aVEe TO ORJSdE � A�FA * , 16, CONTRACTOR TO COORDIh1ATE AVY REQUIRED UTILITY r * + * # pgNNECTICIN$ (WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC) WITH OWNER A 3 Y * * CPO`+EOOI�E� 5�d E+Ed AND RESPECTIVE UTLITY GDMPANIES. _ ' 19- OONTRAC70R TO COORDINATE WITH OWN4_IR ON MAINTAINING: ACCESS TO THF SITF DURING 1� PROP05Ei] Lf14C►iNC LATERAL {1 of 6) aDNSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ANY TEMPORARY SHUTD: MS- LYSUAETER " D L>Ic 24, THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTIS AS SM1kiPLING PORT znyc REPRESENTED ON THESE PLANS IS BASED LPDN PLANS } 11 1 ACiUA� �` (SEE EXCAVATIOIt NOTE) �- AND INFORMATION �mROIIII1p:D IDY THE RESPECTIVE r P(ppp LiT1LITY COMPANIES AND IALINIChPAL DEPARTMEhkTS '� at. ' J I SJPPLEMEr1TED fly FIELD iDENTLFICATI(II14 WHEREVER POSSIBLE. NO WARRANTY IS MADE AS T4 THE - ACCURACY Ur "NESE LO-CAIIUNS OR 1HA1 ALL I. I UNLIERGF;pUND UTILIlIY5 ARE 5HOWA1, THE CIONTRACTOR SHAL_ CONTACT CIG 5AFE AT LEAST 72 iaDURS PRIOR 1 ' {1 of }TION Pd2T I "4 THE START OF CONSnUCTION- OIG SAFE STAG A -FL FPHONF NJ111 IS 1 -BGC -.377-4844- 21. FINAL PAVEKI REMOVAL AND REPLACEI�?Eh�T -0 9EWF 24 `3 ZONE T - REL-) C00RDINA7E0 BY CONTtZAOTOR, o09 MV 37 p1pFRO�' 13} � ��NEL � � � 2Z. ELECTTiLCAL Sh+CRK WITHIN EXISTING PUMP CHAMBER E 'aE L - SHAL_ BE PERFORMED BY A LFCENSEU ELECTIRiCiANL P4yf1fNT SAW 01JT" lk (SEE OEiIJL) � '' � - -� Prcparcd By �. f#UF STs F POk1 C 045 X > d SANK bdC P FOR 11WPORARY s' RICH - ., Y - CONSTRIJGTrJra FENpHF, l (FINAL LOCATION r0 BE AELO _ — _ -, r I 49 HERRING POND ROAD 19 OLD $❑K)TH ROAD COMMATED - ACCESS TO I BLIZZARD$ BAY, MA 02$32 NANTUCKET, MA 025.54 BLa51NC5SES TO REMAIN OPEN s. - DLIRIMG 44N5T1 1CT10w1 ti 1170RqCFFR FROM RFCORD2� MEdrd I11T,PP WAT£Ti R�pg'�F' Ilelj 508,633-2070 (tel] 548,32enen 1, O, (fax) 508,8 w. 33-2282 wwbrackeneng.corn L ., CONTRACTOR TO FELD LI EMSTIHG WATER - IF - ` HRM(E AND REI XATt to' (LI ALWAY FROM _4 SML ABSORPTION S`'STEr.I _t • - 140' BUFFER FR( Al PRGP05ED ERC�OFk & 7 SILTATI{ON SEE NTl41 } COASTAL 3ANK PROPOSED CATCH WGN PROTECTIONDETAIL) , 3-V, xad ]la. lniII.Km m,\lI. F& ­PA 'z 3— I -a Lfiwcr Rd Raw 2,d" 0 2 4 6 8 10 15 20 30 1 inch = 10 feet PROPOSED SEPTIC pp REPAIR PLAID I BREW TER, MASSACHUSEM Prepared F4�. THE LUKE-BREWSTER FEALTY TRUST #9 — #15 LOWER ROAD MAP 37 PARCEL 1 7 111 f73 iRFMV0 PFR RI'H I (-.KCFRUAP.{1fs (7.0m iFNT$ I I;F[l ' I2/21rZ3 RENSE€i F'ER BCH & ! OrSERVAT'ON COMMENTS RED No. Date Revfrian Deacr,ptian 3y Data=Drax n: Checked Sheen MARGil 29, 2423 RED/,PH/BEI ZLB/DAF 2 of 3 10' FAIN. SLAB= TO SLAB FaiNDATION '6., -- F -G.. F,6.= 16.5* NOTE JLJNCT1QN BOX TO FSE INSTAJ 1 ED EXTERNAL TO RISER. ALL OONDUtTS TO BE SE,6_1E0. BRING I 4" SOH 44 PVC SAMPLJNC, PORT 4" SCH 4D PVC INSPECTION PORT (SEE LYSIMETER SAMPLING DETAIL) (PERFORATED WITHIN CHAMKR) SCREW ON CAP WITHIN A C -L- WATER GATE -a - - 10' MIr4_ BOX (COVER TO GRADE) TO SLAB FOUNIDAT10H (1 of 3 PROPOSED - SEE SITE RLM FOR LOGATFICINS} z JUNCI4N BOX COVER TO GRADE- r 311 x 46" SECURAPLE. SEALED 10' MIN. £X151]NC NE1P - f - jJ, TO 8LOIF1`R ALUMINUM ACCESS SECURABLE OA51 IRON 4-80X FRAME & 30' x 48" SECURABLE, SEALED -- UNI? e* <gyF HATCH TO GRAPE COVER r0 GRADE (CONCRETE RISERS � FL014 -- �A11Air $EFLOW ALUMINUM ACCESS (H-20 LOAD PATH) REQUIRED) OVER xA, r.VENT W/ Ld p - - HATCH TO GRADE F G= F, G.=1S.�� MIN- 296&SLC]PE CHARCOAL FILTER LY J70F�LJ7 CASE FR1 P 1 * a SEPTIC TANK /I & EX. F.G.=16,5± - 15.21 ��-2p L�Ap RATED} RFrTRL7J1.J4np� UNE @UFZCJNG St a- A1pF€ 5 INV,= F3 60 - I CONCRETE F.G.= to 73.$ FLO IN - " R*�IIRECT TO d-BOlC INLET TEE RISERS SEE L -V-A. 2' LAYER OF 1/8" BFf.fJW) IN Y.= X3.85 L'TLtItN ARCM D -BOA ' SC}f- aQ p.y 1 - - t -. TO 1 WASHED STONE (SEC NOTE) FIG. rt _�f I "-"'" TEE FLRSI 5ET LEVEL 1{Yr3 = 1 -FJ REQUEST NOTE; FILTER FABRIC µAY -� "___ 4' BCH- 44 P.V.G.FLGJV Ffi ,W $.F. AFP C47JC7RETE 5,7.0690 MIN, -----__-- i 2' pv TOP 12.5± i F `{ RISERS RECSRL}JLaTItlN UNE rllydcfAST 45 51ORAGE = 753 0ALJ1F X. " " + I HE USED IN PLACE OF THE BCT 3. „ o �.,: °_9 nf= oto D.a G'e o 4'f��+ (TY13 ) �fJL4RPLATA0VW tdLOT A EM ERC NCY STi RAGE; F{]RCI S�7 00 WAIN, I - - - - -- . - - - - INV. = 11.70 I WASHED STOH€ ATOP THE v-4 n�¢ 4-o- h°o- �4H. 4Q P. TE FRc7kN FINAL P.0 �_ �� INY,= 7 $ __� .'..'r., 6" (MIN.) UEf'fH OF $TOME BELOVL�INERT$" FLOW STORAGE = 753 GAL/W (T4 REM JUN) 7,106 GAL - -' I Irv.= 12.1 DOT-= 11- 0 I SYSTEM -FILTER FABd21 ra S�1.ppa E11N. EhtEROENCY $TOFRAGE; �. Flow To _ INV -65 INY.= 14,30 INV -= 4- PERfORATET) SCH 410 PVC 5=4.006 ftft ikSEli. IT MUST E1fTEH0 i0 /4- TO 1 1 f2" IDOU6LE WINE OvEl2dFC L�1175 5` EXITIWa,",e alAtia7Ff SEP TFC TANK J1 7.763 GAL I BIS Ex. F F TAF1K INV.= 1,# - 1 I OUT5if}E THE SISTEM- (T4 REUAN PENDING INSKC71G) IN v. 12.70 = 1 4 r - _ INLET � 6' COMPACTED STONE LEAF) ON = $.�Q E I 5' GVERDLG 80' wASHEf) STONE 6' O4ERf]1O F G. 1.11• TEE _P -- EIOT.= $ PUMP OFF = $, 5 I ' BAST ON COMPA0IED I-^ PER STA+iQAlRfl CONDIIlt]tJS FCR _ ,� LEAD CN = 5.28 - -- - SUBCRADE I SECONDARY TREATMENT UNIT$ �� WNL+,= h•c `�-° n°o � FLOC = 6,67 23'f i fi" COMPACTED STONE PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION BOX 9 I-RCDUC110t# OF kIIHIiiL]ki PUMP OFF = i- 4 T.= .:+T UNOEk REMENAL USE - A w o- nAc oa, c'o- o°a o -o ° C a 9 u 9 0 0 ° 0 (SEAN n11.E `� SAND FLOC76R - $-955 ,41tEP BASE ON COMPACTED fJ . - PRE -CAST WATERTIGHT � - E9L]T-= 6. �.� 12~ HOLE SUf3GRA0E f�CFSi1A1G 5, 000 G,4ta'_OFW7 &!a7-hfIC:ROBFCS 1 4.GI3' C�gIJrNfJwJL1tR SEPARATION 15 � � (�I-20 LIDAD RATED) FiU1V ff21Ad ZUKf'S e t v'v o,° o°a ❑,_ .° 0.4 0fa a"° o,. o^° a K-crOFAST 4.5 ah ?WT InCA774X {INTI :.... I- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I +UOYI (LrP TO 2 FT RED. LAOVORS, APARTMENTS; EX4577NG 4,000 GALLCW PRE -CAST 1�" MIN. INSIDE DIhF- , REMAIN ��� �� 6' MIN. SUMP ENGINEER T1(j INSPECT OVERIDJG LIMITS *7 THE Tl#AE IDA ALLOYrEB) & 771RIFT STONE �mv.. 1.3.49 PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION FiOX #1 PSP CMARSEP CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TITLE 5 SANG GRCAJMD WATER 0 EL. 7.19 PROPOSED 4,OH�1) GALLON PRE -CAST PRE -CAST WATERTIGHT (TO R€MAIN PEKONG otspEGFION) CONTRACTOR TO TIE INTO EXISTING - INV.= 13. 77 PUMP CHAMBER - WATERTIGHT FG.=15,71 (FLOATS TO BE RESET PER FORCE MAIN WITH NEW 2" PVC d� {SCC PROJECT NOTE 29) (H-20 LOW RATED} TO BLOWER UNIT & A60VIE ELEVATIONS) CONNFCT TO PRI)PI)SEID D -BOIL. PROPOSED SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM (M- LDAD ) 12- MLN, INSIDE DIM. VENA (CONTRACTOR TO BUOYANCY OALOULATQNS: FORCE MAIN SHALL BE PITCHED 5TnNE BED (28' WIDE x 80' LONG x 6" DEEP) ALL SPOILED SOIL TO BE REMOVED TANK TO BE FmROFr ED mrH Li' MIN. SUMP COORDINATE INTERIOR 4.005 ft/ft TOWARDS FXIVINC, - 60T ~ ` I ' ASTM STANDARD C 1727-93 SEAL PLUMBING AND F144AL UP FORCE=7,876 LBS WITH 5 JJ15TR1t3UnDN CITIES SPACED 4' APART OtJ CENiEI PE4QW AND VATH;N 5` OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CQNFTRM ALL O,a 0'. 6,0 c°a O,a c°a 0.s o°ti otb o,o C.'a n _ PL11AF CHAMBER. H- LOADING PROPOSED SYSTEM, CLEAN SAND 70 ESL EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS EUQYANCY CALCULATONS PROPOSED DUPLEX H'LIMP FLOW 4' -4a P_v. BLawER LOCATION) DN FURr�=77.411 Ll � ) PIROADED. ENGINEER TO INSPECT P&P PRiOR TO THE START OF 1' "' SY51'Ely- PUMPS TO DE SAFETY FACTOR- 9-9 EKJSTING RECIRCULA11ON PUMP GONSTRUCIlDN OR THF � EXfSTWIG 2500 GALLOJV SEP77C TAArK 12 UP FORGE=5.714 L8S GlC'ULDS WS0511B j HP FEOlf D- S=1 -alp% LAIN- � EX, TO REMAIN FOR RE- U9E- LIkiITS PRIOR T{] PL Ac:1EFATO OF DE 5 ORDZRING 4F MATERIALS. ALERT DN FORCE=62.779 LBS OR APPROVED EQUAL PRppp�rd =INV= P CHW4IWIBER REDIRECT FORCE MAIN TO EINGINWR BAUD. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (TD RE]+1AIN PENS INS Ec7 l►I} INV.= 1 .411 MiCrOFAST 4.5 PRIOPOSED D-BII #1.(EEE MINIMUM DF 48 DB HOURS ,ADVANCED RD 01` HILALTH A DESIGN ENGINEER OF ANY SAFETY FAQTE)R= 10,89 DISCREPANCIES. DENITRIFICATIOM UhHi SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION} NOTICE OF ALL IN�FCTICNS. (1) ALL SYSTEM COMPLkNLNIS To OE MARKED WITH MAGNETFO MARRING, TAPE. (2) ALL SYSTEM COMPONENTS TO BE W*Tlitkl 36" OF FINISHED GRAVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, (3) ALL PLUFABING WITHIN 10 FEi T OF THE FOUNDAT14N TO BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED PLUMtEt.R, (4) ALL EXISTING SEPTIC COMPONENTS TO PUMPED, CLEANED, AND INSPECTED FOR STRUCTURAL. INTEGRITYAND WATER -TIGHTNESS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED- THE DESIGN ENONEER ON RECORD SHALL BE CONSULTED If ANY FLAWS OR SEAPAGE IS FOUND. (5) GREASE TRAPS #1 AND #2 ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY (SEE NOTE (4)) (6) BUOYA44CY CALCULATIONS SHOWN ONLY FOR STRUCTURES THAT EXTEND BELOW THE EXISTING GROUNDWATER ELEVATION OF 7,59 (EX. 4,01DID PUMP CHAMBER & PR, 4,000 GAL PUMP CHAMBER) 10' MIN. a�� TO SLAB FO-JNBATI4N BOT,=%. 7�i aARx WjM1 RR51�614 � PROPOSED 5,000 GALLON 1310-MICROSICS vc.a, rrt MicroFA T 4,5 DENITRIFICATION UNIT '30111 WATERTIGHT (H-24 LOAD RATED) "' TANK TO BE EMBOSSED WITHi ASTM STANDARD C 1227-93 SEAL Mir-roF T 4.5 DETAIL CAST IRON WATI=R NOT TO SCALE NOTES 1Cr�25]MIN L Blower piping to FAS 18moy not exc�:ar1 101) FI 130.10111 tU1cx1 lerit' I ar,d use venl 0 4 4 elbows mmirYPOM. For dIstenCo.; groolPr Thor) IPO F [,'M.r3m] - cmr13kI11 si*note 9 loc_1pry. PANnva-r rr,usi rj*� Ipcc3iec1 {itJUwe IlcKjdjsluriding Wu ler levels on n MIN 0m] CIRCUL&RTIES cor4creie buse 56.8" X 35.8" X 2.5" f li4 X 91 X A.,35cm] minimum. #` 1bf MIN 1=12" 341 Ir I II Ob,-eFv-,tion Po't All pEurnbirQ aqd van lr+g 1 mvYt wo+er [i�'1f 7- vent 1G} Tog 1ocr�l�q ak��x iin�h S1rcWxtp or r,it�her 1p uwoid infi11ra1iorL, C=ap .,se 1 gaskelsrrvtO be- ir=CurpJ COMPACTED SUBGRADE with venr grate w1at lease 20sgin. [12)sq. cm] open surtacr. ar('a - Sar -Are i see noses 2-5 Mth simrkiCss sleol s[rrows- Veni piping mull riot (3IN)w Ck)rKienyPplg 1)VdCJkI D IrLs riiocd I or rjeaie buck pressure. Venl must be alIe firri shed grade or higher. PUfl1p our Ports treated 3. All ufipurtena„c-e> to FAS TO [e.g. lurkk primp outs, etc.) muni UDD(Orrn to all _� ctflLWen p couatlry, state, province, and local plumbing anal electrical codes. Tile seo note r,hlha blower canhol s}^slerr) Is provkded by BNra-.M,IcrabNcs, Inc. Prrrrrp-out access grower Inn ,7 note shall be adequate Ma thoroughly clean ALIT both zones. 4. All inspection, viewing anij pump out ports must be secured to prevent - ? 19' MIN acbderttal Of unautnorlmcl In cc ess. ' .5. Tank, piping. COPCIUlr, etc. are provicieel 15y others. Mover control system by Bdo Mcrobic;s. Inc. See insfullation n-mnuaL Treute'l6. If Fess Ihgn thr= speciFed minirrrufrls are Consvc sidered neceiry. II ln!'huerll 47-114" MIN factory For y1,idance. sac nota S 7. Alt v1ping and arLcillarY equipmeni installed after FAST must no impede or I I 1 restric free Now of effluent. 8. ThP Tom k[S] shcill t)EI dP1J1jTmr (j las TyrPVeTLi Dir p[]ssr3Sje t)ejv '-en the selIliTig see note 5 zona}tank ana the trcaiment zona and preventing an a1r lock. Examples IInch Ian, o E-rtyfflc wall sralr:rE to the ed cr 1rontryw,Int zone Lrilet line with a pip., CuT,- Cor rex_laPry 101 {jkJid(3nrc­ 179' MIN n3pect or71 Uft'Tg hale hl,1N T Pump cui pori 9. 1110 air supply IirrEr into iim rust Lr nit rFKAI ko-n S��airod rQ FirHMeni vjt rm Iinri see notes indufned dorLifige. The air supply lime should be secured wit a Frr;Rl Srsl�lil3t noal corrosive clomp every 2tt. minimum. Rona 74"±1J2' 14- Specialized treatment levels mayreq ufrespecific features to be 77"±1 I20D-J±1 3 inuorporaIed into the design. Consult factory for guidance. FAS' MIN III- Refer I mrir"Feclurersspecs for leg exierLsions requiremenMs. �� 1?2 ± ?2 17. Seoire Txovlded wpvorl braces to prevenl movement 0 24' MIN [20 9.6±1,3] I61 ml'j F ` L'ner I}m a 5,--e note 17 1 r I M G G 1 r I m A T E I LEACHING FIELD CROSS SECTION -- NOT TO S(',ALE FINISHED GRADE SEE L.1),A- 1/15- TO 112 4. SCH. 40 PVC R:EOVEST- DOUDLE WASHED STONE PERFORATED PIPE OR FILTER FAGRIC (TSP ]314- TO 1; -1/2 - DOUBLE WASHM STONE (FAIN, r 4.0' 4.D' 4.[}' 4-'' 4-0' A.I:y o' .5.0' E" OVERlllr% REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL SPOILED AND/OR UNSUITABLE SOILS, SEE PLAN AND PROFILE FOR AODITIONALL INFORMATION - S.V, wao Dfa 4gs',BmywA '"�HnW ' 5 U, lr cd (I A mA9-1i Lc -r H -h%yv 2�" ACCESS/INSPECTION PORT DOLLAR DETAIL I NOT To 511 EROSION CONTROL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SUPPORT NET F'EIST FILTER FASM 1.2' piA. MIN- BLOM IN FILTER MEDIA (COMPOST MATERLAL) BIODEGRADABLE F1L>IREXX SOXX OR ,APPROVED EOLIAL k. -Flow HAVVE SOIL �7LK FILL SILT SACK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE GRATE INSTALLATION- LIFT STRAPS REMOLE THE GRATE FROM CATCH BASIN. If USING DP110NA4 011, AE9SORUENT5; PLACE ABSORBENT PILLOW IN UNIT. STAND THE `�- GRATE ON 1:ND. MDVE THE TOP LIFTING, STRIPS OUT OF THE WAY AND PLACE Tt-LE GRATE INTO THE DANDY @A0 11 $0 THAT DAF40Y BAC II THE GRATE IS BELOW THE TOP STRAPS AND STANDARD F48RIC IS AN ABOVE THE LOWER STRAPS- HOLDING T14E I ORANGE WOVEN LIFTING DEVIGFS, INSFRT THF GRATE INTO ! 1 MONOFILAMENT THE INLET, bUIMPING STRAP Al LOWS MAINTENANCE-- 1 FOR EASY REMOVAL OF CONTENTS REMOVIE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM WIDINITY Of UNIT AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT REGULAR INTERVALS, iC K INTO THIr DANDY BAG 11� JF THE CONTAINMENT AREA IS MORE THAN I FULL OF SEDIMENT, THE UNIT MUST BE EMPTIED. TO E'MPT! UNIT. LIFT THE UNIT OUT OF THE INLET USING THE LIFTING STRAPS ANO REMOVE THF GRATE IF USING, OPTIONAL 011. ABSORIHENT$; REPLACE ?'. DANDY BAG I1 ARSORJTFNT MEN NEAR SATURAT101N. INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES EXISTING DUPLEX PUMP SYSTEM TO REMAIN PENDING INYPECIII & TESTING. FLOAT I I EFFLUENT SAMPLING LYS IMETE R DETAIL ELEVAT 0 4S TO BE PDJDSTEII AS SROWN LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVAL REQUEST PURSUANT TO MA 310 CMR 15.4.04 AND 15.405, ARE] THE TOYLN OF BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH REGULATIONS MAXIMUM FEA51$LE COMPLIANCE AND LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVALS, THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS ARE MADE GN BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT: 1) 19,405(1)(b) - A 1-0'# DIVERGENCE FROM FULI COMPLIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR A 3. SA± DEPTH OF 4DDti1ER OVER A 9011. RESORPTION $YSTF..M. 2) A 25'-.t; QIVERCENCE FROM FULL COMPLIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR A 75`± SETBACK TD A SOIL ABSORP11OR SYSTEM FROM A SURFACE wATEH (WETLAND) AS DEFINED BY BREMISTEq BOARD QF HEALTH SETBACK REGULATION, 2.) A }9'f DIVERGENCE FROM FULL COMPLIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR A Mitt SETE3,ACK TO A SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM FROM A SURFACE WATER (COASTAL BANK) AS DEFINED RY BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH SETBACK 12EWI-A'I ION. DESIGN CALCULATION SOIL TEXTURAL CLASS; CLA55 I PERC- RATE: 4 MPI (SU NOTE_$I DESIGN FLOW REQUIRED: FAST FOOD MOIICT SHOP): 24 GPI]/SEAT ; 32 SEATS = 64A UPll RETAIL SPACE' Sd GPD f L.OW SF + 13,617 SF = 691 CPD MIESDENTIAL: 110 CAPD / DEDfN4t711 d 3 BEORDOMS = 33U GPD LEACHINIG, SYSTEM; ME WOE x _@]� LONG x B° DEEP LfACHINa FIELD 20TTOM AREA= 2.240 S.F. SIIDEWALL AREA= - S.F. TQTAL= 2.249 '51. LOADING RATE = 4.74 GPD/SF FLOW PROVIDED: 2.240 SF * I GPD/SF = 1.65E3 GPD > 1,651 GPD REQUIRED NQ11F! PERC, RATE OF 4 uNOTES PER INCH PR041DE0 BY THE RECORD Pipes TITLE) 'SITE PLAN OF LANG IN BREWSTER, MA55' PREPARED FOR THE LUKE i3FVRSTER REALTY TRUST EY SCFIOFlELD BROTHERS. INC. LAST RE4ISEU 11 15-1 15. TYPICAL TRENCH REPAIR & INFRARED SEAL _DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SAWCUT AND REPAIR WIT -1 F NAL PAYAC EXTENIS 1f Mk. 11 -IC INfARFn SEAL- OF INSTAU_AT10N AS DIRECTED 12" M!N.� INFARED SEAL- SALVAGE EAL-' ��VAGE���T1ON O EXISTING BITUMINOUS CONCRETE TOP COURSE EXISTING BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BLINDER COURSE EXISTING ROADWAY SUB-EIASE IS NOT TO BE DISTURBED # �F�1'I�I�k.�TOFtATION: LY < MATCH EXISTING FOP COURSE, BINDER COURSE - F a z 6" MIN. OF PROCESSED GRAVEL PER MHD M2.01.7 OR MATCH EXISTING LIMITS OF THICKNESS EXCAVATION IMPERVIOUS LINER 2" PUSH ON PL.A511C GRAIN FILL CATCHMENT AREA W/ PEA STON€ NOTES: i- CREATE TRAY U51NQ AN IIWPERy1i]k15 UNER KIATEMAL. 2. TR0 DiMENS10NS $HALL f!E Y x T. .3. LOCATE TRAY BETWEEN Two (2) *' PVc DCSTRIRUT10N LATERALS, 4. SLOPE S10ES IOwARDS CL.KTL:R LUlY i'OIHI- PLINCIURE A G�N'IT_R HOLE LINO SLICE AN Y APPROM MATELY 2' x 2. PUSH EACH TRIAN-GLE INTO THE 3' PVC PIPE AND PLACE TFIE PVC DRAIN INTO PIPE TO SECURE, S. CONTRACTOR SHALL 0"IJINIATE 074STRU0CtN OF LY -;4 METER YATH THE DED04 IDNGINEER JN THE FELE. ri 4' END CAP 4" SCREW CAP WITHrN CAST IRAN WATER CATE BOX & GQVER (SEE DETAIL) FTNIShiED GRADE 4' $CH- 4{1 PVC PERFORATEDE / PIP MIR. ) RECORD SOIL LOGS TP ATO. 6A _ TP ND. 9A _ TP NO. 10A DATE, 9/13/1343 DATE_ 7/16/1985 DATE: 7/16/t985 GW. a 59" Gw, 0 72- GW. 140" V. 0" 4' FILL tlL L FILL $' ORI6- TOP SOL OR1G amfc TQP 115- TOP SOIL 501E - 51LT SILTY SAND & 5ANb w/ mTH SAI'* AY LARGE ROCKS .i2' &RUBBLE 2g - COARSE SAPM 36" / WO $AND/ GW 0 CLAY / ROCKS 59' COARSE SAND EINE SILTY 10 G' / TIED- SAND Smile w,TH / CLAY f firW WY 15 V GRAVEL f 7" MOCKS TO 6' FINE SILTY ow ID SAND WIATH 100' CLAY 76 90" 112' CURRENT GROUNDWATER ELEVATICIN (FL.. 7,19) OETF-RMINFp UTIL17114G A DATA LOGGER SET WITHIN AN EXIS11NG 40HYPTORrNG WELL- SEE PR04ECT NOTE 29 ON SHEET 1 FOR MORE INF'QRMA11QN- SOIL LOG NOTE THE ABOVE SOIL INFORMADON WAS TAXEN FROM A PLAN TITLED "SITE PLAN OF LAND IN BREWSTER, MASS" PREPARED VOR THE LUKE BREWSTER REALTY TRUST BY SCHOFJELI> BROTHERS, INC- LAST REVISED 14-15-ig8r). SOIL CONDITIONS UNDER THE PROPOSED SOIL AM3SORPTLON SYSTEM SHALL. BE CONFI+2MED AT 71tE 11ME OF CONSTRUCTION BY BRA.pCEN ENG,IgURING, INC- AND THE TOWN OF BREWSTER. EXISTING UNSuITABLC SOJLS SHALL 13E RLMC]VED AND REPLACED - SEE EXCAVA110N NOTE BELOW EXCAVATION NOTE THIS SYSTEM iREOUIRES THE EXCAVATION OF ALL UNSUITABLE AND/OR SPOILED SOIL :INDERNEATH AND *iF1i1N 5' HORIZONTALLY OF THE SDIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM. UNSUITABLE AND/OR SPOILED SOIL tS TO BE REPLACED W1TtH SAND C#dFORMFNG TO 3rO CIMR SECTION 15,255, CONS-MUC110N IN FILL, CONTTRACTCIR iS RESPONSfBLE TO PROVIDE ENGrNEER WITH STEVE ANALYSIS OF REPLACEMENT 401A7LRIAL Pi,IUR 10 INETALLAnON UPDN REQUEST, STONE LEACHING DE!) I'MPERVIOU5 LINER (TUCK INTO 3" PV(;) 2' PUSH ON PLASTIC DRAIN 3" SCH 40 PVC 90' ELBOW 3" SCH 40 PVC 3" x 4" SCH 40 PVC SANLTARY TEE CAST IRON WATI=R 1-2" LIP GATE BOX & COVER PLUG SET FINFSH GRADE PAVEMENT 4 10'' 50NIC-TUBE COLLAR FORM CIRCUL&RTIES (TYP-) 1=12" 341 THICK CONCR I I COLLAR TO REST ON II SLIBGRAIDEPACTED COMPACTED SUBGRADE MATERIAL (3000 PSI) EROSION CONTROL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SUPPORT NET F'EIST FILTER FASM 1.2' piA. MIN- BLOM IN FILTER MEDIA (COMPOST MATERLAL) BIODEGRADABLE F1L>IREXX SOXX OR ,APPROVED EOLIAL k. -Flow HAVVE SOIL �7LK FILL SILT SACK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE GRATE INSTALLATION- LIFT STRAPS REMOLE THE GRATE FROM CATCH BASIN. If USING DP110NA4 011, AE9SORUENT5; PLACE ABSORBENT PILLOW IN UNIT. STAND THE `�- GRATE ON 1:ND. MDVE THE TOP LIFTING, STRIPS OUT OF THE WAY AND PLACE Tt-LE GRATE INTO THE DANDY @A0 11 $0 THAT DAF40Y BAC II THE GRATE IS BELOW THE TOP STRAPS AND STANDARD F48RIC IS AN ABOVE THE LOWER STRAPS- HOLDING T14E I ORANGE WOVEN LIFTING DEVIGFS, INSFRT THF GRATE INTO ! 1 MONOFILAMENT THE INLET, bUIMPING STRAP Al LOWS MAINTENANCE-- 1 FOR EASY REMOVAL OF CONTENTS REMOVIE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM WIDINITY Of UNIT AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT REGULAR INTERVALS, iC K INTO THIr DANDY BAG 11� JF THE CONTAINMENT AREA IS MORE THAN I FULL OF SEDIMENT, THE UNIT MUST BE EMPTIED. TO E'MPT! UNIT. LIFT THE UNIT OUT OF THE INLET USING THE LIFTING STRAPS ANO REMOVE THF GRATE IF USING, OPTIONAL 011. ABSORIHENT$; REPLACE ?'. DANDY BAG I1 ARSORJTFNT MEN NEAR SATURAT101N. INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES EXISTING DUPLEX PUMP SYSTEM TO REMAIN PENDING INYPECIII & TESTING. FLOAT I I EFFLUENT SAMPLING LYS IMETE R DETAIL ELEVAT 0 4S TO BE PDJDSTEII AS SROWN LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVAL REQUEST PURSUANT TO MA 310 CMR 15.4.04 AND 15.405, ARE] THE TOYLN OF BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH REGULATIONS MAXIMUM FEA51$LE COMPLIANCE AND LOCAL UPGRADE APPROVALS, THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS ARE MADE GN BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT: 1) 19,405(1)(b) - A 1-0'# DIVERGENCE FROM FULI COMPLIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR A 3. SA± DEPTH OF 4DDti1ER OVER A 9011. RESORPTION $YSTF..M. 2) A 25'-.t; QIVERCENCE FROM FULL COMPLIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR A 75`± SETBACK TD A SOIL ABSORP11OR SYSTEM FROM A SURFACE wATEH (WETLAND) AS DEFINED BY BREMISTEq BOARD QF HEALTH SETBACK REGULATION, 2.) A }9'f DIVERGENCE FROM FULL COMPLIANCE IS REQUESTED FOR A Mitt SETE3,ACK TO A SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM FROM A SURFACE WATER (COASTAL BANK) AS DEFINED RY BREWSTER BOARD OF HEALTH SETBACK 12EWI-A'I ION. DESIGN CALCULATION SOIL TEXTURAL CLASS; CLA55 I PERC- RATE: 4 MPI (SU NOTE_$I DESIGN FLOW REQUIRED: FAST FOOD MOIICT SHOP): 24 GPI]/SEAT ; 32 SEATS = 64A UPll RETAIL SPACE' Sd GPD f L.OW SF + 13,617 SF = 691 CPD MIESDENTIAL: 110 CAPD / DEDfN4t711 d 3 BEORDOMS = 33U GPD LEACHINIG, SYSTEM; ME WOE x _@]� LONG x B° DEEP LfACHINa FIELD 20TTOM AREA= 2.240 S.F. SIIDEWALL AREA= - S.F. TQTAL= 2.249 '51. LOADING RATE = 4.74 GPD/SF FLOW PROVIDED: 2.240 SF * I GPD/SF = 1.65E3 GPD > 1,651 GPD REQUIRED NQ11F! PERC, RATE OF 4 uNOTES PER INCH PR041DE0 BY THE RECORD Pipes TITLE) 'SITE PLAN OF LANG IN BREWSTER, MA55' PREPARED FOR THE LUKE i3FVRSTER REALTY TRUST EY SCFIOFlELD BROTHERS. INC. LAST RE4ISEU 11 15-1 15. TYPICAL TRENCH REPAIR & INFRARED SEAL _DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SAWCUT AND REPAIR WIT -1 F NAL PAYAC EXTENIS 1f Mk. 11 -IC INfARFn SEAL- OF INSTAU_AT10N AS DIRECTED 12" M!N.� INFARED SEAL- SALVAGE EAL-' ��VAGE���T1ON O EXISTING BITUMINOUS CONCRETE TOP COURSE EXISTING BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BLINDER COURSE EXISTING ROADWAY SUB-EIASE IS NOT TO BE DISTURBED # �F�1'I�I�k.�TOFtATION: LY < MATCH EXISTING FOP COURSE, BINDER COURSE - F a z 6" MIN. OF PROCESSED GRAVEL PER MHD M2.01.7 OR MATCH EXISTING LIMITS OF THICKNESS EXCAVATION IMPERVIOUS LINER 2" PUSH ON PL.A511C GRAIN FILL CATCHMENT AREA W/ PEA STON€ NOTES: i- CREATE TRAY U51NQ AN IIWPERy1i]k15 UNER KIATEMAL. 2. TR0 DiMENS10NS $HALL f!E Y x T. .3. LOCATE TRAY BETWEEN Two (2) *' PVc DCSTRIRUT10N LATERALS, 4. SLOPE S10ES IOwARDS CL.KTL:R LUlY i'OIHI- PLINCIURE A G�N'IT_R HOLE LINO SLICE AN Y APPROM MATELY 2' x 2. PUSH EACH TRIAN-GLE INTO THE 3' PVC PIPE AND PLACE TFIE PVC DRAIN INTO PIPE TO SECURE, S. CONTRACTOR SHALL 0"IJINIATE 074STRU0CtN OF LY -;4 METER YATH THE DED04 IDNGINEER JN THE FELE. ri 4' END CAP 4" SCREW CAP WITHrN CAST IRAN WATER CATE BOX & GQVER (SEE DETAIL) FTNIShiED GRADE 4' $CH- 4{1 PVC PERFORATEDE / PIP MIR. ) RECORD SOIL LOGS TP ATO. 6A _ TP ND. 9A _ TP NO. 10A DATE, 9/13/1343 DATE_ 7/16/1985 DATE: 7/16/t985 GW. a 59" Gw, 0 72- GW. 140" V. 0" 4' FILL tlL L FILL $' ORI6- TOP SOL OR1G amfc TQP 115- TOP SOIL 501E - 51LT SILTY SAND & 5ANb w/ mTH SAI'* AY LARGE ROCKS .i2' &RUBBLE 2g - COARSE SAPM 36" / WO $AND/ GW 0 CLAY / ROCKS 59' COARSE SAND EINE SILTY 10 G' / TIED- SAND Smile w,TH / CLAY f firW WY 15 V GRAVEL f 7" MOCKS TO 6' FINE SILTY ow ID SAND WIATH 100' CLAY 76 90" 112' CURRENT GROUNDWATER ELEVATICIN (FL.. 7,19) OETF-RMINFp UTIL17114G A DATA LOGGER SET WITHIN AN EXIS11NG 40HYPTORrNG WELL- SEE PR04ECT NOTE 29 ON SHEET 1 FOR MORE INF'QRMA11QN- SOIL LOG NOTE THE ABOVE SOIL INFORMADON WAS TAXEN FROM A PLAN TITLED "SITE PLAN OF LAND IN BREWSTER, MASS" PREPARED VOR THE LUKE BREWSTER REALTY TRUST BY SCHOFJELI> BROTHERS, INC- LAST REVISED 14-15-ig8r). SOIL CONDITIONS UNDER THE PROPOSED SOIL AM3SORPTLON SYSTEM SHALL. BE CONFI+2MED AT 71tE 11ME OF CONSTRUCTION BY BRA.pCEN ENG,IgURING, INC- AND THE TOWN OF BREWSTER. EXISTING UNSuITABLC SOJLS SHALL 13E RLMC]VED AND REPLACED - SEE EXCAVA110N NOTE BELOW EXCAVATION NOTE THIS SYSTEM iREOUIRES THE EXCAVATION OF ALL UNSUITABLE AND/OR SPOILED SOIL :INDERNEATH AND *iF1i1N 5' HORIZONTALLY OF THE SDIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM. UNSUITABLE AND/OR SPOILED SOIL tS TO BE REPLACED W1TtH SAND C#dFORMFNG TO 3rO CIMR SECTION 15,255, CONS-MUC110N IN FILL, CONTTRACTCIR iS RESPONSfBLE TO PROVIDE ENGrNEER WITH STEVE ANALYSIS OF REPLACEMENT 401A7LRIAL Pi,IUR 10 INETALLAnON UPDN REQUEST, STONE LEACHING DE!) I'MPERVIOU5 LINER (TUCK INTO 3" PV(;) 2' PUSH ON PLASTIC DRAIN 3" SCH 40 PVC 90' ELBOW 3" SCH 40 PVC 3" x 4" SCH 40 PVC SANLTARY TEE Who is affected? Properties located within Brewster's Nitrogen -Sensitive Watersheds (See map on reverse): Pleasant Bay Herring River Bass River Swan Pond River What Are The New Requirements? Either the Town must proceed with Watershed Permits or Exemptions to address its overall contributions to the watersheds OR owners must upgrade to best available, nitrogen -reducing (I/A) septic systems within 5 years; In December 2023, the Town committed to creating a new Watershed Permit for Herring River and applied for Watershed Permit Exemptions for Swan Pond and Bass River. • No owner will be required to upgrade septic system to I/A under the new Title 5 Regulations at this time. • However, other existing town or state regulation might still require such upgrades, e.g. in Zone IIs • A Watershed Permit allows for: A more thoughtful, longer term (20 year), adaptive community planning process; • More effective and holistic solutions, better tailored to Brewster's specific needs and concerns; • Better alignment with other important water resources concerns like drinking water and ponds; • Better alignment with Town's existing Integrated Water Resources Management Planning; • Lower overall cost to the Brewster community as a whole. • Since 2018, Town already has a 20 -year, Watershed Permit for Pleasant Bay, shared with neighboring towns. • The first of its kind in MA; the new State Watershed Regulations were modeled from this permit. r JVV r 1 PIF ' IJ u PLEASANT BAY � r• r HERRING RIMER -- f t� CA RNER I- SAN POND R 1 E R 29ONEW� L rr11 R I r— i' _— �F 0 0.5 1 Date: 12/5/2023 Data Sources: Bureau of Geographic Q Municipal Boundary Major MassDOT Roads Watersheds Information (MassGIS), ESRI Brewster Parcels U.S. Highway Bass River Watershed ,ma is for informational purposes anl Streams State Route Herring River Watershed may mt be suitable for legal, engineering. or surveying purposes. Major Ponds Non -numbered route i Pleasant Bay Watershed Swan Pond River Watershed Watersheds in Brewster Subject to the New Septic System Regulations Find My Property Go to: :tps::i%-w*ti-�j.maT)sRrnhnp.+i-qz bb-evystefine lir,+)" hips4l Click on Find tab. enter s• eet name and # to locate proper-ty Click on `La.,.- rs tab, select "Nit open I•. --aired Emba. ments" Questions? Please contact the Brewster Health Department (508) 896-3701 ext. 1120 health@ Brewster-ma.gov February 1, 2024 Town of Brewster 2198 MAIN STREET BREWSTER, MASSACHUSETTS 02631-1898 PHONE: 508.896.3701 EXT. 1120 FAX: 508.896.4538 brhealthi abrews ter -ma. K ov WWW.BREWSTER-MA.GOV Health Department Amy L. von Hone, R.S., C.H.O. Director Sherrie McCullough, R.S. Assistant Director Tammi Mason Senior Department Assistant Mr. Andrew Osei MA Department of Environmental Protection BWR/Cape WW Management Southeast Regional Office 20 Riverside Drive Lakeville, MA 02347 Advance copy via email Andrew.Oseigmi giov RE: REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE ON LOCAL ENFORCEMENT FOR I/A NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE State Sanitary Code 310 CMR 15. 215 "Nitrogen Loading Limitations" Dear Mr. Osei, The Brewster Board of Health is involved in the review of treatment performance for approved I/A Systems with Nitrogen Reduction capability under both the former, and current Title V Regulations. A number of licensed systems have been identified as chronically not meeting the previously specified treated effluent standard of 19 mg/L of nitrate/total nitrogen (average > 25 mg/L). Wherein, New Construction and Expansion of Use approvals were granted under the presumption of such limitations, the Brewster Board of Health seeks guidance from the MA Department of Environmental Protection on the enforcement of standards on existing licensed systems, and moving forward, under the 10 mg/L nitrate/total nitrogen standards prescribed for I/A use in Nutrient Sensitive Areas as part of Watershed Management Plans. In the Board of Health consideration of such standards for drinking water and wetland (estuaries and ponds) impacts, should the performance be viewed simply as a numerical value ^r ^+v,�theMise as a percentage of nitrogen removed, or as mass (lbs/kg) discharged into the environment wherein water use and occupancy might be considered. The Brewster - of Health is committed to the protection of public health, safety and the environmental under Title V, State Sanitary Code. We have recently gave notified owners of under -performing systems to contact their operator and/or design engineer to take necessary actions to improve nitrogen reduction performance. In our consideration of anticipated response, we seek clarification on performance obligations and guidance and policy for enforcement. The Brewster Board of health is hoping to have a response from you ahead of our March 2024 meetings, wherein we anticipate response from notified I/A system owners. If you should have any questions, or need additional information to frame your response, please contact the Brewster Health Director, Amy von Hone. Thank you. Respectfully, David C. Bennett, Chair Brewster Board of Health N:\Health\Waste Water Information\Title 5 Revisions 2022\BOH Request for Guidance IA Nutrient Reduction 2.7.24 DRAFT.doc cc: Gerard Martin, DRD/BWR MassDEP(SERO) Gerard. martin�@mass.gov Marybeth Chubb, WSC/BWR, MassDEP (Boston) MaryFbeth.chubh$2mass. Roy Brian Baumgaertel, MASSTC Director/BCHED bbaumPaertel9b cap acod.gov Teresa Kett, Executive Director MHOA ckett@mhoa.com N:\Health\Waste Water Information\Title 5 Revisions 2022\BOH Request for Guidance IA Nutrient Reduction 2.7.24 DRAFT.doc J 774-330-3019 0 MASSTCQCAPECOD,GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA (http://w .wpewd.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTO.CAPECOD) W(HTWITTER.COMWASSTC_CAPECOD) O(/NVWW.YOUTUBE.COM/CHANNEU/UCOYCWLXGSS5UNESHAWOH7DG) ®(/NVWW-INSTAGRAM.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD/) MASSTS (https://www.masstc.org) The MassachusettsAltemative Septic System Test Center �— Back to all technologies (/technologies) AdvanTex Orenco Systems, Inc. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/.eater/wastewater/titLe-5-innovative-alternative-technology-approvaLs.htmt) for the technology. The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU) that provides an aerobic treatment process. The System is a multi -pass (recirculating), packed bed aerobic wastewater treatment system designed to treat residential strength wastewater from facilities with a design flow of Less than 1o,000 gpd. AdvanTex AX -RT Series (AX20-RT and AX25-RT) The AX -RT consists of an 800 gaLLon two -chamber fiberglass reinforced polyester (FRP) recirculating treatment tank, preceded by a separate septic tank with effluent filter. The engineered textile media is suspended from the top of the treatment tank with a portion of the media positioned over the first compartment (the recirc/blend chamber). The remainder of the media is position over the second compartment (the recirc/filtrate chamber) from which filtrate (treated effluent) is discharged. The two chambers are separated by a baffle wall. A recirculating pump draws water from the first compartment of the recirculating tank, and sprays it onto the top surface of the textile media at regular timed intervals to achieve a recirculation ratio of between 3:1 to 5:1. Filtrate drains from the textile media back into the two chambers. Timer settings can be adjusted if actual flows vary significantly from projected flows. The baffle wall between the chambers is fitted with a recirc-return valve for equalization during low -flow periods. Under low daily flow conditions, the valve allows l00% of the filtrate to be returned to the recirc/blend chamber for continued recirculation. The recirc-return valve is similar to a check valve in that it allows preferential flow in one direction only — in this case, from the recirc/filtrate chamber to the recirc/blend chamber. The recirc-return valve closes when the liquid head on the recirc/blend side is equal to or greater than the liquid head on the recirc/filtrate side. When the liquid head on the recirc/filtrate side is higher, the pressure differential pushes the recirc return valve open for filtrate to pass back to the recirc/blend side of the baffle, thus providing for continued recirculation during periods of Low or no inflow. Flow from the recirc/blend chamber can pass to the recirc/filtrate chamber only through the treatment media. AdvanTex AX2o and AXioo The System includes a pre -assembled. UV -protected fiberglass reinforced polyester module ("filter pod") that contains the textile media. The filter modules are equipped with UV protected, removable fiberglass reinforced polyester lids and contain one inch of insulation on the underside of the Lid. Except where separate septic and recirculating tanks are required per Special Condition 4 below, an AX2o filter module is typically installed on top of a two compartment processing tank with a minimum capacity of 1500 gallons. Raw sewage enters the twocompartment Processing Tank through its inlet tee. In the first compartment, the raw sewage separates into three distinct zones: a scum Layer, a clear Layer, and a sludge Layer. Flow-through ports in the tanks baffle waLL allow effluent from the clear layer to flow into the second compartment of the tank. The Biotube Pump Package in the second compartment pumps filtered effluent to a distribution manifold in the fitter module. Effluent percolates down through the textile media and is coLLected in the bottom of the filter pod. The treated effluent flows out of the filter pod through the filtrate return Line, which returns the treated effluent to the recirculating splitter valve (RSV). The RSV automatically splits or diverts the flow between the processing tank and the final discharge. The RSV also controls the Liquid level within the processing tank. During extended periods of no flow, loo percent of the treated filtrate effluent is returned to the processing tank. The recirculating pump vault is equipped with a removable fitter cartridge that is equivalent to a septic tank effluent tee filter. In systems with separate septic and recirculating tanks, the pump vault is located in the second tank (the recirculating tank). The effluent is applied at a preset recirculation ratio of between 3:1 to 5:1, controlled by a timer. Timer settings can be adjusted if actual flows vary significantly from projected flows. In aLLAdvanTex systems, the recirculating pump controls are equipped with a high water Level override and high water alarm. The alarm and control circuits are connected to an independent power source run from the main power source of the facility. The System is equipped with a VeriComm control panel (CP) or equal which is connected via a telephone line or internet connection to the VeriComm monitoring system, providing continuous remote monitoring, maintenance information, management and control of each individual system. The CP provides the contracted operation and maintenance (O&M) provider with information to manage incoming alarms 24 hours per day through automatic notification, preestablished alarm protocols, an online List of aLL active alarms, online diagnostic data and online input and review of alarm responses. The CP also provides for site management through editable online information, an online tabular display of all operating data and provides standard and custom reports. The CP unit transmits report information to the O&M provider/Operator and the manufacturer of the System. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type General Remedial Provisional Pilot Secondary Treatment V V V Approval Type General Remedial Provisional Pilot Nitrogen Removal Credit V (Some Models) Phosphorus Removal Credit Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technology Approval Letters thttp://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/titLe-5-innovative- aLternative-technology-approvals.htmO webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. MANUFACTURER Orenco Systems, Inc. 814 Airway Avenue Sutherlin, Oregon 97479 United States P:800-348-9843 W: https://www.orenco.com/ (https://www.orenco.com/) REAL-WORLD DATA 230 220 210 200 190 180 17 .S6 X15 E 4 X13 512 0 1 -210 Z 9 m 8 O 7 ~ 6 5 4 3 2 1 —10 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f < < < < < < G G < < C IF < IF < < IF < G G G G G < IF < < < < < < < < < G < < < G < < < < < < < < < < < G G G G G G N A A W N W F-` W A N A N 4 N W V W N W N t-` W N N W t-` A N W W V 0 A A N [il N N A 0+ .P N 1 O A O W O W V V Vl W V A N W V A A w V W. 0. V V W l0 A A N V Lq A O N O N W W W V N V W M W W W W W W N W O VI �D V �D �D V1 V A In F+ W V tD VI N VI �0 In �D UI N l0 l0 m t0 {AJ V lWµ In �Oi �NJ A W �D N Ol ID F` N W W Oi VI Vl �O W VI A V W 0 W N C W W W W 1-' Q+ r 1-' �' W A W W U1 N W individual §yYerni' b W W O F+ W ID N r N ID F` W to N W A IFSM Q+ ©o x lft WX Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World AdvanTex Systems Data Filters Property Use —All Property Uses -- Occupancy — All Occupancies — Update Chart Data Analysis TOOLS 121 below 19mg/L (71.2%) I D Show Box Median of medians: 14.59 TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA V V 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecwd.gov 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.masstc.org/login) Legal Notices (https://www.masstc.org/abouttlegal-notices) .% 774-330-3019 0 MASSTC@CAPECOD.GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA(http://www.capecod.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTC.CAPECOD) V(UTWITTER.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD) 0(//WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/CHANNEL/UCOYCWLXGSS5UNESHAWOH7DG) QQ (//WWW.INSTAGRAM.COM/MASSTC—CAPECOD/) M.A S STE (https://www.masste.org) The Massachusetts Akernative I&P Septic System Test Center Back to all technologies (/technologies) Atl1phid ome F.R. Mahony&Associates, Inc, DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative-aLternative-technoLogy-approvals.htmi) for the technology. Amphidrome and Integral,Amphidrome: The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU) that utilizes a Submerged Attached -Growth Sequencing Bioreactor (SAGSB). The System may consist of an anoxic/equalization tank, which must comply with the design criteria set forth below, and either a single reactor which alternates between aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and a clear well or a single reactor installed in a clear well. Wastewater passes from the anoxic/equalization tank, through a granular biological filter and into the clear well. A pump is then used to reverse the flow back to the anoxic/equalization tank. This cycle is repeated multiple times and the effluent is discharged to the soil absorption system. Amphidrome Process (nitrogen reduction): The Amphidrome Process (the'System') is installed in series between the building sewer and the soil absorption system (SAS) of a standard Title 5 system in a manner which neither intrudes on, replaces a component of, or adversely affects the operation of a Title 5 system constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000, subject to the provisions of this Approval. The System is a biological wastewater treatment system that utilizes a Submerged Attached Growth Sequencing Bioreactor (SAGSB). The System consists of an anoxic/equalization tank, which must comply with the design criteria set forth below, a single reactor that alternates between aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and a clear well. Wastewater passes from the anoxic/equaLization tank, through a granular biological filter and into the clear well. A pump is then used to reverse the flow back to the anoxic/equalization tank. This cycle is repeated multiple times and the effluent is discharged to the soil absorption system. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type r__—_ ._ Secondary Treatment General i Remedial V, Provisional Pilot Nitrogen Removal Credit V Pho Ephuo (iAI::'ed Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technotogy Approval. Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative- alternative-technology-approvals.htmL) webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. MANUFACTURER F.R. Mahony & Associates, Inc. 273 Weymouth Street Rockland, Massachusetts 02370 United States P:781-982-9300 W: http://www.amphidrome.com/ (http://www.amphidrome.conV) REAL-WORLD DATA Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World Amphidrome Systems 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 :1170 0160 E150 140 W130 0 2D �,11D 2100 — 90 80 F 70 - - 60 — so20 _ 40 30 10 0 —10 'IA, '141a 'qMa, 1,11A "MA, "MP gAjA 'QMa 41,p qMA, 'qMA, qMA, qMA qMA, qMo qMo qMA qMa qMA q yA qMo qMo q�%A, gA7P qMA q 2-131 1--is2369 'lp4 41--11 3639 21-16 25q4q I37 96, 1616, 2111 2S66 IIq> 1326 121 2S>q 3139 IS11Z5. 2I>8 ISI> 219-1 8?3 3847 q2S Individual Systems Data Filters Property Use — All Property Uses -- Occupancy — All Occupancies — Update Chart Data Analysis TOOLS 18 below 19mg/L (69.2%) O Show Box Median of medians: 12.625 TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecod.gov 9 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.masstc.org/login) �y I V Legal Notices (https://www.masstc.org/abouViegal-notices) .; 774.330.3019 0 MASSTC@CAPECOD.GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA (http://www.capecod.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTC.CAPECOD) r (// wr rrER.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD) 0 (/RNWW.YOUTUBE.COM/CHANNEL/UCOYCWLXGSS5UNESHAWQH7DG) Q (/PNW W.INSTAGRAM.COMIMASSTC_CAPECOD/) MASSE (https://www.masstc.org) The Massachusetts Alternative Septic System Test Center «- Back to all technologies (/technologies) FAST Bio-Microbics DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://vwvw.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative-aLternative-technotogy-approvats.htmt) for the technology. FAST: The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU). The System, MicroFAST® 0.5.0-75-0.9-1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and g.o, and HighStrengthFAST® i.o,1.5.3.0.4.5 and g.o, and, NitriFAST® 0.5, 0.75. 0.9. 1.5, 3.0.4.5 and 9.o units are installed in a tank or tanks having a primary settling zone and an aerobic biological zone. Solids settle in the primary settling zone that is quiescent. In the aerobic zone, the sewage is continually agitated and aerated. Bacteria in the sewage attach to the surface of the submerged plastic media: they reproduce by consuming the organic material in the sewage. FAST (nitrogen reducing <200o GPD): The FAST® system is an aerobic wastewater treatment system that utilizes a completely submerged fixed film process to treat organics and nitrify, and a passive recycle system for denitrification. Each model. contains submerged media specific to the application. Microorganisms grow on the media and remove soluble contaminants from the wastewater, utilizing them as a source of energy for growth and production of new microorganisms. The FAST® system insert consists of a Liner around the media and an airlift to provide aeration and mixing within the confines of the liner. The area outside the liner in the septic tank remains anoxic for denitrification and a passive recirculation system moves the aerated wastewater to the outside of the Liner to obtain denitrification. The aeration and circulation inside the Liner are provided by a blower that pumps air into a draft tube that extends down the center of the media. Treated effluent passes out of the aerobic zone of the treatment plant through a pipe connected directly to a baffled quiescent area in the liner. Final effluent is discharged to a soil absorption system. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type General Remedial Provisional Pilot Secondary Treatment V I Nitrogen Removal Credit d d (Some Models) Phosphorus Removal Credit Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technology Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/titLe-5-innovative- alternative-technology-approvaLs.html) webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. MANUFACTURER Bio-Microbics 8450 Cole Parkway Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66227 United States P: (800)753-3278 W: http://www.biomicrobics.com/ (http://www.biomicrobics.com/) REAL-WORLD DATA Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World FAST Systems N N 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N AtVo NWr (d/D� W�T t�0`W N V A W F T AW TT�.DD Ah`V�0V0t WV VWI OT?A�Jn �TD TO�TD TW iDD]OAJ NT VOOONN0�O0 NT VI O NNTOT�OVT?TTN NIDOT CWOTr VlDI NF` iTp NW Tv1N0�fN NO 14O1 AWNN MNToNWVr N :r+ WW MN4 NOWMMN N almwA O? V ? 0Nrsy 0 mO 10 TNHD 0 1 W O N Individuastes SVD NtlD0 Data Filters Property Use —All Property Uses -- Occupancy —All Occupancies — Update Chart Data Analysis Tools Q Show Box Median of medians: 21.54 175 below 19mg/L (42%) TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA 411. o 0I$� F� U t*f 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecod.gov 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.masstc.orgAogin) v v Legal Notices(https://www.masstc.org/abouttlegal-notices) .% 774-330.3019 Z MASSTC@CAPECOD,GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA (http://W w+.capewd.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTC,CAPECOD) WyrrwrrTER.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD) 0(//WWW.YOUTUBE.COWCHANNEUUCOYCWLXGSS5UNESHAWQH7DG) OO(/NJWW.INSTAGRAM.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOW) MASSE(https;//wvvw.masstc.org) The Massachusetts Alternative &P Septic System Test tenter �- Back to all technologies (/technologies) FUJI CL@ail Fuji Clean USA, LLC DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://vvww.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative-aLternative-technology-approvaLs.html) for the technology. Fuji Clean USA, models CES, CE7, CE10 The System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU) that includes a circuitous flow train through a primary sedimentation chamber, anaerobic treatment chamber, and aerobic contact/ filtration chamber aLL within the treatment tank. Wastewater flows into the sedimentation chamber (Chamber D where the solids and greases are separated from the wastewater by gravity. The effluent flows into the Anaearobic Contact Filtration Chamber (Chamber 2) where spherical -skeleton filter media aid fixed film and suspended -growth anaerobic micro-organisms to decompose organic matter. The wastewater then flows into the Aerobic Contact Filtration Chamber (Chamber 3) where waved board media and cylindrical holLow mesh media provide a Large surface area for fixed -film aerobic bacteria growth and digestion of organic matter as weLL as filtration of the wastewater. Chamber 3 also provides for settling of sludge prior to discharge. Two air -Lift pumps, each powered by a single linear diaphragm blower, provide air to the aerobic chamber as well as flow recirculation and equalization. Sludge generated in Chamber 3 is recirculated to the Sedimentation Chamber and discharge of treated wastewater is through an overflow effluent weir or controLled by the Effluent Air Lift Pump, Fuji Clean USA, models CEN5, CENT, CEN10 (nitrogen reducing): Wastewater flows into the sedimentation chamber (Chamber 1) where the solids and greases are separated from the wastewater by gravity. The effluent flows into the Anaerobic Contact Filtration Chamber (Chamber 2) where spherical -skeleton filter media aid fixed film and suspended -growth anaerobic micro-organisms to decompose organic matter. The wastewater then flows into the Aerobic Contact Filtration Chamber (Chamber 3) where waved board media and cylindrical hollow mesh media provide a large surface area for fixed -film aerobic bacteria growth and digestion of organic matter as well as filtration of the wastewater. Chamber 3 also provides for settling of sludge prior to discharge. Two air-lift pumps, each powered by a single linear diaphragm blower, provide air to the aerobic chamber as well as flow recirculation and equalization. Sludge generated in Chamber 3 is recirculated to the Sedimentation Chamber and discharge of treated wastewater is through an overflow effluent weir or controlled by the Effluent Air Lift Pump. The System uses an aerobic -anaerobic recirculation process to biodegrade nitrogen. The first step in the process is decomposition of protein and amino acids by anaerobic hydrolysis, forming ammonia nitrogen, which occurs in the anaerobic chamber (Chamber 2). The second step (biological nitrification) is oxidation of ammonia nitrogen to form nitrite and then nitrate ions, which occurs in the oxygen -enriched aerobic nitrite/ nitrate ion -rich water back to the Chamber 1 and subsequently Chamber 2, where the anaerobic bacteria reduce the nitrate ions to nitrogen gas. The recirculation rate is optimized for nitrogen removal by adjusting the airlift recirculation pump rate. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type General Remedial Provisional Pilot i Secondary Treatment I Nitrogen Removal Credit Phosphorus Removal Credit V Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technology Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative- alternative-technology-approvals.htmp webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. MANUFACTURER Fuji Clean USA, LLC 41-2 Greenwood Road Brunswick, Maine 04011 United States P: 207-406-2927 W: http://www.fujicleanusa.com/ (http://www.fujicleanusa.com/) REAL-WORLD DATA Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World Fuji Clean Systems so _ 40 J m E 30 C N O z 20 ............ .—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—._—.—.—.—.—._—.—.—.—.—.—.—._—.—.—.—.— f0 ♦O 10 0 Fuj-2641 Fuj-3735 Fuj-4180 Fuj-3763 Fuj-4427 Individual Systems Data Filters Property Use — All Property Uses — Occupancy —All Occupancies — Update Chart L Data Analysis Tools 3 below 19mg/L (60%) O Show Box Median of medians: 15.844000000000001 TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA pF J 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecod.gov 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.massto.org/login) Legal Notices (https://www.masstc.org/aboutAegal-notices) J 774-330-3019 0 MASSTC@CAPECOD.GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA (http:/Aw .capecod.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTC.CAPECOD) V(//rwITTER.00WMASSTC_CAPEC0D) O(//WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/CHANNEUUCOYCWLXGSS5UNESHAWQH70G) Q (IAN W.INSTAGRAM.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD/) _ A S S1 C (https://www.masste.or9) The Massachusetts Alternative lip Septic System Test Center Back to all technologies (/technologies) N ItreX Lombardo Associates DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative-alternative-technology-approvaLs.htmD for the technology. The Nitrex Fitter (the'System') is installed in series after an approved I/A treatment technology, which provides nitrifying pretreatment, and before a soil absorption system constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.100 -15.279, subject to the provisions of this Approval. Units may be installed in parallel and/or series to accommodate design flows to less than 1o,000 GPD. The Nitrex Filter consists of nitrate -reactive media, formulated from wood by-products, contained in a watertight enclosure. Pretreatment is required to nitrify the wastewater. The effluent from pretreatment then percolates through the Nitrex Fitter's reactive media. Effluent from the Nitrex Filter is recycled once or multiple times over the media, with the final effluent discharged to the soil absorption system. For installations indicating wastewater with high strength TKN- nitrogen and tow alkalinity, an alkalinity feed system is provided with the Nitrex Filter System. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type General Remedial Provisional Pilot Secondary Treatment Nitrogen Removal Credit Phosphorus Removal Credit L V Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technology Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative- alternative-technology-approvals.htmL) webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. ' MANUFACTURER Lombardo Associates 188 Church Street Newton, Massacusetts 02458 United States P: 617-964-2924 W: http://www.lombardoassociates.com/ (http://www.lombardoassociates.com/) REAL-WORLD DATA IOm, Q+ COX* 11 Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World Nitrex Systems 60 50 J m E 40 c Q) M ° 30 z 'l I F20 — ............. —--—---—-—- ——---- 10 a NIT -5027 NIT -249 NIT -108 NIT -20 Individual Systems Data Filters Property Use — All Property Uses -- Occupancy — All Occupancies — Update Chart Data Analysis Tools r 2 below 19mg/L (50%) 0 Show Box Median of medians: 20.09 TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA a OF 0 J 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecod.gov If 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.masstc.org/login) Legal Notices (https://www.masstc.org/aboutAegal-notices) v� V J 774-330.3019 0 MASSTC@CAPECOD.GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA (http:lhv .capewd.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTC.CAPECOD) W(MMITTER.COWMASSTC_CAPECOD) O(//WWW.YOUTUBE.COMICHANNEUUCOYCWLXGSSSUNESHAWQH7DG) (//WW W.I NSTAGRAM.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD/) MASSY; LO (https://www.masstc.org) The Massachusetts Alternative Septic System Test Center Back to all technologies (/technologies) NitROE DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://vw w..mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative-alternative-technology-approvaLs.htmL) for the technology. The NitROE ® 2KS or 2KM WWTS (the'System') is installed in series between a Title -5 system septic tank and a soil absorption system constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.200 - 15.279. subject to the provisions of this Approval to accommodate design flows of less than 2.000 GPD. The System is comprised of two -unit processes which are sequentially performed in two different chambers. The first chamber is aerated, via an external air pump and airline header/hose arrangement, to achieve both organic carbon reduction along with the biological conversion of ammonia -N to nitrate -N. From the Aeration Chamber, the wastewater then gravity flows into a Denitrification Chamber where, in the presence of natural organics from wood chips, bacteria mediate the conversion of nitrate -N to inert N gas that exits to the atmosphere via the Title 5 system vent piping. Depending on design flow and availability of local tank structures, the sequential Aeration and Denitrification process steps can be performed in the same single tank, which is NitROE® 2KS WWTS, or each process could be performed in its own separate tank with the overall NitROE® WWTS comprised of multiple tank combinations, which is NitROE® 2KM WWTS. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type General Remedial I Provisional Pilot Secondary Treatment VI - V Nitrogen Removal Credit `� { - Phosphorus Removal Credit I� ^ Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technology Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative- alternative-technology-approvals.htmL) webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. REAL-WORLD DATA 12D 110 100 90 J C, 80 E 70 N P 60 L Z 50 0 40 30 20 ---------- 10 Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World NitROE Systems .rzrr 9aR-4I84,4 4 ,RoTR.gIBrR.Q QTR.4 a- , D, 9.,R 449 4 9',R 3 6TR 4 9,n s�R 3 aTR y 3'R y OQR-43 �R.4 9TR 4?.,R 4 8„R 4 OAR 4S[ Individual Systems Data Filters Property Use —All Property Uses -- Occupancy —All Occupancies — Update Chart Data Analysis TOOLS 29 below 19mg/L (96.7%) Q Show Box Median of medians: 3.7175000000000002 TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecod.gov 11 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.masstc.org/login) Legal Notices (https://www.masstc.org/aboutliegal-notices) Ii J 774-330-3019 0 MASSTC@CAPECOD.GOV MASSTC is a Program of the Regional Government of Barnstable County, MA (http:/Av .capecod.gov) f (//BUSINESS.FACEBOOK.COM/MASSTC.CAPECOD) W(irrwrrTER.COM/MASSTC_CAPECOD) O(/IWWW.YOUTUBE.COM/CHANNEUUCOYCWLXGSS5UNESHAWQH7DG) @ (IMI W W.I NSTAGRAM.COWMASSTC—CAPECOD/) MASSTcw- (https://www.masstc.org) The Massachusetts Alternative 6 *9 Septic System Test Center «- Back to all technologies (/technologies) SeptiTech Bio-Microbics DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY Descriptions for proprietary technologies are from the Massachusetts DEP Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative-alternative-technology-approvaLs.htmL) for the technology. SeptiTech Models 400, 550, 750,1200,1500, 3000 and SeptiTech Engineered Systems The SeptiTech System is a Secondary Treatment Unit (STU), that uses an enhanced recirculating biological trickling filter to remove biochemical oxygen demand (6005) and total suspended solids (TSS) from wastewater. The System utilizes a hydrophobic media, composed of polystyrene beads or polystyrene beads and solid media, in a two-stage process where biological growth occurs within the media pore spaces. Models 400 through 75o are installed in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or concrete tanks. Models 1200 through 3000 are installed in concrete tanks. A programmable logic controller (PLC) controls the treatment process by continuously monitoring incoming flows and adjusting the treatment process (recirculation, sludge return and discharge cycles). Details of this process are as follows: B Wastewater from the septic tank enters the treatment tank and collects in a reservoir at the base of the tank where it mixes with treated wastewater. m A recirculation pump controlled by the PLC pumps the wastewater to the treatment area at the top of the tank where air is drawn into the wastewater, m The aerated wastewater is sprayed over the hydrophobic media which is suspended above reservoir, wastewater trickles through the media and returns to the reservoir, S Wastewater is circulated over the media 70 or more times per day, 0 SoLids in the reservoir are periodically returned to the septic tank, and 0 The PLC activates the recirculation, return sludge and discharge pumps. SeptiTech models M400N, M55oN, M750N, M120oN, M15ooN, M25ooN and M30ooN and SeptiTech Engineered Systems The SeptiTech unit (the'System') is installed in series between the building sewer and the soil absorption system (SAS) of a standard Title 5 system in a mannerwhich neither intrudes on, replaces a component of, or adversely affects the operation of a Title 5 system constructed in accordance with 310 CMR 15.000, subject to the provisions of this Approval. Two or more units may be installed in parallel to accommodate Larger design flows. The System is an aerobic treatment system that uses an enhanced recirculating biological trickling filter treatment process with anoxic phase to reduce biochemical oxygen demand (BODS), total suspended solids (TSS) and total nitrogen from sanitary wastewater by biological degradation. The wastewater flows into the first of two tanks consisting of a two compartment primary- anoxic tank where primary settling and partial denitrification occur. The second processor tank contains the trickling fitter media and pumps for recirculation within the trickling filter, recirculation back to the anoxic tank and for discharge to the distribution box of the SAS or to a pressure distribution system. In addition to BOD reduction, further nitrification occurs in the mixed -liquor as it passes through the trickling filter with the ammonium in the wastewater converting to nitrate. The System uses a hydrophobic media composed of either polystyrene beads or polystyrene beads with honeycomb shaped solid media, in a two-stage process that allows biological growth within the media pore spaces. SeptiTech Models M40oN through M75oN come prefabricated in HDPE or concrete tanks and have hydrophobic bead media in mesh bags. SeptiTech Models M12ooN through M3000N are configured similar to M400N series tanks however these units include a Larger processor tank and use a combination of the Larger commercial solid media and hydrophobic bead media in mesh bags. A programmable logic controller (PLC) controls the treatment process. The PLC continuously monitors incoming flows and adjusts the treatment process (recirculation, recycle, sludge return and discharge cycles). • Wastewater from the primary anoxic tank enters the treatment tank and collects in a reservoir at the base of the tank where it mixes with treated wastewater. • A recirculation pump controlled by the PLC pumps the wastewater to the treatment area at the top of the tank where air is drawn into the wastewater, • The aerated wastewater is sprayed over the hydrophobic media which is suspended above the reservoir, wastewater trickles through the media and returns to the reservoir, • Wastewater is circulated over the media 70 or more times per day, • Effluent is returned on a scheduled basis to the anoxic tank for denitrification • Solids in the reservoir are periodically returned to the anoxic tank The control panel including alarms are mounted in a location accessible to the operator (or Service Contractor) of the System. MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY APPROVALS Approval Type General Remedial Provisional Pilot Secondary Treatment V V Nitrogen Removal Credit d (Some Models) Phosphorus Removal Credit Please check the Title 5 Innovative/Alternative Technology Approval Letters (http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/wastewater/title-5-innovative- alternative-technology-approvals.htmU webpage at Massachusetts DEP for the most up-to-date information. MANUFACTURER Bio-Mlcrobics 8450 Cole Parkway Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66227 United States P:(800)753-3278 W: http://www.biomicrobics.com/ (http://www.blomicrobics.com/) REAL-WORLD DATA IDE RL + 920X* q9 Effluent Total Nitrogen (mg/L) from Real -World SeptiTech Systems 190 180 170 160 150 140 X130 P20 X110 aaJ100 0 90 Z 80 70 0 60 ~ 50 40 30 � 20—.— — — -—--- — — — — ' �� l0 0 —10Ln Ln V/ w (n in VI V7 V1 V) (n Vl VI w V) VI Vi VI VI VI (n V) (n V1 Vf V1 VI V) VI N (A V) V) W VI VI VI M W Vf V) V1 W VI in VI VI (n N N N VI (n (n VI V) VI VI (n VI in in (n M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rn m m m m m m m m m T T T T T v V v V v v v v v V v O v v V T v V v v v v v v v T T v v V T v v v v v v v v V v v W V v V v v V v T T v v v v� v V v v N N N N N N � N N NN N . W N V N Y 1L 'L r r O W ut Vt N O �O N W N N V1 A N W N VI .P O O W VI N N N N V1 W F+ O 0 N O a, N O V V D) W D] V V W? N �O O t0 In lJl ut Q� W T A N N V N D\ A O N W VI N VI W A W O A W A �D V W W 01 A N? O O N W�W�V W W O V O A O W W N ID N N m A N V m 0 0 0 VIIndyste S W 'Drvid�ua� m, O VI Ns V O' O N V V NAA VI O O A O VI W OJ m VI VI T Data Filters Property Use —All Property Uses -- Occupancy — All Occupancies — Update Chart Data Analysis TOOLS 235 below 19mg/L (91.4%) 0 Show Box Median of medians: 8.62 ( V V TEST CENTER REPORTS & DATA ar ((VV*11 li.*yn�l S� �ut35�- J 774-330-3019 0 masstc@capecod.gov qj 4 Kittridge Road, Sandwich, MA Login (https://www.rnasstc.org/login) Legal Notices(https://www.masstc.org/aboutAegal-notices) Happy New Year! We hope this newsletter finds you well. Here are the latest updates from our Responsible Management Entity: New Leadership #�r Recently joining the RME team, our new Program Manager, David lorio Izzo, is diligently reviewing the work and initiatives of their predecessor. This process is crucial for familiarization and will pave the way for strategic next steps to further our mission. EPA Approval for Sampling We're thrilled to announce that our Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for sampling has received approval from the EPA. This milestone will allow us to sample the systems, installed under the RME. This marks a significant advancement for our future data collection efforts. Team Expansion Exciting times lie ahead as we're expanding our team! We are currently recruiting for two new positions - a Field Technician and an Administrative Assistant. The Field Technician will play a key role in on-site septic system `nIIE sampling, field measurements, system operation and maintenance, and data recording. The Administrative Assistant will be instrumental in supporting the TEAM RME Director, Program Manager, and Field Technician in implementing '°wo�R project elements, stakeholder engagement, and the development of various products and reports. RTP Meeting Scheduled r The Recommended Technology Panel (RTP) is gearing up for its first i 2024 meeting. Comprising experts from the field, the RTP will 77 collaborate with MASSTC to review I/A system performance data a collected by external entities. This collaboration is vital as it may W introduce I/A technologies into the RME, enhancing our knowledge base. MASSE BARNSTABLE COUNTY The MassachusettsARernative CARE COD REGIONALGDVERNMENT - Septic System Test Center I/A Database Rebuild Our I/A Database project is progressing. The first phase has focused on is making the current database operational, and the second phase is set to t enhance functionalities, improve security, and provide expanded access to regulatory stakeholders. This initiative is geared towards facilitating informed Watershed Management Plans for municipalities by granting easy access to data on current I/A systems. Real-world Monitoring MASSTC continues to monitor I/A systems installed in local communities to assess their real-world performance and nitrogen reduction. This ongoing initiative ensures that our data is grounded in practical outcomes, contributing to informed decision-making. w � Future Initiatives: Rebranding of RME Stay tuned for an exciting rebranding initiative to better reflect our evolving mission and vision. Contractor Meeting 2.0 Building on past successes, we're gearing up for an enhanced version of our contractor meeting to foster collaboration and innovation. Workshops for Decision Makers We're developing workshops tailored for decision - makers to share insights and foster informed choices. Cost Calculations for Sewer vs. I/A Systems Exploring the economic landscape, we're working on comprehensive cost calculations, including future costs, to assist in decision-making between sewer and I/A systems. . Thank you for your continued support as we navigate these exciting developments. We look forward to a future of enhanced environmental stewardship and sustainable wastewater management. C�J :w L� I 6f) websiteww.masstc.org; email:masstc@barnstablecounty.org MASSE �`' ' January 17, 2024 Bryan Webb (via email) Ocean Edge Resort 2907 Main Street Brewster, MA 02631 RE: Ocean Edge Resort Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report — December 2023 Dear Mr. Webb: Weston @ Sampson 55 Walkers Brook Drive, Suite 100, Reading, MA 01867 Tel: 978.532.1900 Enclosed please find the Monthly Operations Reporting Package for the Ocean Edge Resort wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) located at 832 Village Drive in Brewster, MA. Weston & Sampson Services, Inc. would like to note the following: • All regulated effluent parameters of samples collected on December 13 were reported to be within their respective permissible limits. • Data was filed with MassDEP electronically, via eDEP. A copy of the transaction is included in this package. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, or the wastewater treatment facility, please feel free to contact me at wsscompliance@wseinc.com. Regards, WESTON & SAMPSON SERVICES, INC. James R. Tringale Compliance Coordinator cc: Brewster Board of Health (via email) FR Mahony Associates (via email) westo nand sa m pso n.com Offices in: MA, CT, NK VT, NY, NJ, PA, SC & FL x Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection O EP Transaction Copy L� a Here is the file you requested for your records. To retain a copy of this file you must save and/or print. Username: WSSINC Transaction ID: 1665412 Document: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Size of File: 1076.98K Status of Transaction: Submitted Date and Time Created: 1/26/2024:10:45:31 AM Note: This file only includes forms that were part of your transaction as of the date and time indicated above. If you need a more current copy of your transaction, return to eDEP and select to "Download a Copy" from the Current Submittals page. - - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 633 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number DAILY LOG SHEET 2023 DEC DAILY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: OCEAN EDGE CONFERENCE CTR a. Name ROUTE 6A b. Street Address BREWSTER -MA C. City d. State 2. Contact information: JAMES R. TRINGALE a. Name of Facility Contact Person 19785321900 b. Telephone Number 3. Sampling information: 12023 a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) CHRIS VIGNEAU c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 02631 e. Zip Code WSSCompliance@wseinc.com c. e-mail address 1ONSITE MEASUREMENTS b. Laboratory Name Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Daily Log Sheet - 2023 Dec Daily F All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. r This is the last selection. 3. r Delete the selected form. T gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 633 _ IBureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. lax wentifcation dumber DAILY LOG SHEET I 2023 DEC DAILY LI3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Daily Readings/Analysis Information Date Effluent Reuse Irrigation Turbidity Influent pH Effluent Chlorine IN Flow GPD Flow GPD Flow GPD pH Residual Intensity (mg/1) M) 1 1976 - i l 7.01 7.23 2 4985�I 3 4985 4 4985 6.99 7.28 5 12165 � 7.02 7.26 6 2390 7.06 7.22 7 4617 7.04 7.25 8 3285 7.03 7.29 T� 9 .4805 10 4805 11 4805 6.98 7.34 12 122 _ 6.99 7.31 13 1362 I _ ; 7.02 7.30 14 11413 7.04 7.27 15 1178 I 7.07_ 7.35 _ 16 3611 17 3611 18 3611 I 7.09 7.26 19 1398 _ 7.12 7.27 20 1118 ', 7.07 7.23 _ 21 1220 7.10 7.24 22 3344� _ 7.07 7.22 23 18558 24 1858_ 25 18588 26 11858 7.04 7.19 27 11856 7.01 7.23 28 15138 I i ~I 7.05 7.30 29 3414 j I 7.02 7.19 30 16249 31 6249 gdpdis.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 I L Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: OCEAN EDGE CONFERENCE CTR a. Name iROUTE 6A b. Street Address BREWSTER MA C. City d. State 2. Contact information: JAMES R. TRINGALE a. Name of Facility Contact Person 97853219007 b. Telephone Number 3 Sampling information: 12/13/2023 a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) CHRIS VIGNEAU c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 633 1. Permit Number �. Tax identification Number 2023 DEC MONTHLY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency 02631 e. Zip Code WSSCompliance@wseinc.com c. e-mail address ONSITE MEASUREMENTS b. Laboratory Name 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Monitoring Well Data Report - 2023 Dec Monthly 1! All forms for submittal have been completed. 2. f_ This is the last selection. 3. r Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 " 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 633 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number � Groundwater Permit p • 2. ax tdenti�cation plumber MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT 2023 DEC MONTHLY - — I 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" < • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled • DRY = Not enough water in well to sample. Parameter/Contaminant DG2 DG3 DG4 DG5 UGI Units Well #: 1 Well #: 2 Well #: 3 Well #: 4 Well #: 5 Well #: 6 PFI 6.40 S.U. STATIC WATER LEVEL 45.9 FEET SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE 410_ UMHOS/C 5.90 6.10 16.50 6.20 44.8 142.2 147.0 ;40.3 620 _I 275 230 �I320 mwdgwp-blank.doc • rev 09/15/15 Monitoring Well Data for Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. .rade Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 633 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identTication Number DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT 2023 DEC MONTHLY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency A. Facility Information 1. Facility name, address: OCEAN EDGE CONFERENCE CTR a. Name ROUTE 6A b. Street Address BREWSTER C. City 2. Contact information: MA 02631 d. State e. Zip Code JAMES R. TRINGALE a. Name of Facility Contact Person 9785321900 SSCompliance@wseinc.com b. Telephone Number c. e-mail address 3. Sampling information: 12/13/2023 RI ANALYTICAL a. Date Sampled (mm/dd/yyyy) b. Laboratory Name VARIOUS ANALYSTS c. Analysis Performed By (Name) B. Form Selection 1. Please select Form Type and Sampling Month & Frequency Discharge Monitoring Report - 2023 Dec Monthly r All forms for submittal have been completed. 2.- This is the last selection. 3. Delete the selected form. gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 633 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number .7 t, Groundwater Permit 2. Tax idenOicat-on Number DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT 2023 DEC MONTHLY 3_Sampling Month & -Frequency D. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled 1. Parameter/Contaminant 2. Influent Units BOD 26 — MG/L TSS 38 MG/L TOTAL SOLIDS 1430 MG/L AMMONIA -N 10.95 MG/L _ NITRATE -N MG/L TOTAL NITROGEN(NO3+NO2+TKN) MG/L OIL & GREASE MG/L 3. Effluent 4. Effluent Method Detection limit ND 10 10 0.063 1.86 we 2.0 0.050 1,1)4-117 infeffrp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Discharge Monitoring Report • Page 1 of 1 Important:When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. Any person signing a document under 314 CMR 5.14(1) or (2) shall make the following certification If you are filing electronic -ally and want to attach additional comments, select the check box. F Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 633 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. Tax identification Number Facility Information OCEAN EDGE CONFERENCE CTR a. Name ROUTE 6A b. Street Address BREWSTER C. City MA 02631 d. State e. Zip Code Certification "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that ther are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." IMARIANNA COOMBS 1/22/2024 a. Signature omments b. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) gdpols 2015-09-15.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 J. fVL:Y01r1 L - Specialists in EnVironrryental SerVl=ee LABORATORY REPORT WS Inc.dba Weston & Sampson Date Received: Attn: Christopher Vigneau Date Reported: 55 Walkers Brook Drive P.O. Number Suite 100 Reading, MA 01867 Work Order #: 2312-21055 Project Name: PROJECT# 25364 OCEAN EDGE RESORT - MONTHLY 12/13/2023 12/21/2023 Page 1 of 3 Enclosed are the analytical results and Chain of Custody for your project referenced above. The sample(s) were analyzed by our Warwick, RI laboratory unless noted otherwise. When applicable subcontracted results are noted and subcontracted reports are enclosed in their entirety. All samples were analyzed within the established guidelines of US EPA approved methods with all requirements met, unless otherwise noted at the end of a given sample's analytical results or in a case narrative. The Detection Limit is defined as the lowest concentration of an analyte that can be reliably detected under routine laboratory conditions. The Reporting Limit is the minimum concentration that can be reliably quantified under routine laboratory conditions. These results only pertain to the samples submitted for this Work Order # and this report shall not be reproduced except in its entirety. We certify that the following results are true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. If you have questions or need further assistance, please contact our Customer Service Department. Approved by: Kristin Phelan Data Reporting Manager Laboratory Certification Numbers (as applicable to sample's origin state): Warwick RI * R1 LAI00033, MA M-81015, CT PH -0508 Page 2 of 3 Report Qualifiers & Abbreviations These qualifiers/abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Qualifier Descriptions * Recovery outside of acceptance limits B Analyte detected in method blank at a level about the detection limit D Surrogate diluted out to reach a parameter result within the instrument calibration curve E Parameter result exceeds calibration curve J Estimated result based on MDL Abbreviation Definition BLK Method Blank CFU Colony Forming Unit DF Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit LCS(D) Laboratory Control Standard (Duplicate) MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal MDL Method Detection Limit MPN Most Probable Number MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) QC Quality Control RPD Relative Percent Difference TIC Tentatively Identified Compound TNTC Too Numerous to Count *CS Field data provided by the client R.I. Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Laboratory Report WSS lnc.dba Weston & Sampson Work Order #: 2312-21055 Project Name: PROJECT# 25364 OCEAN EDGE RESORT - MONTHLY Sample Number: Sample Description: Sample Type: Sample Date / Time: PARAMETER BOD 5 TbtalSuspended Solids Total Solids Ammonia (as N) Sample Number: Sample Description: Sample Type: Sample Date / Time PARAMETER BOD 5 Total Suspended Solids Nitrite (as N) Nitrate (as N) TKN (as N) Sample Number: Sample Description: Sample Type: Sample Date / Time: PARAMETER Oil & Grease Gravimetric Page 3 of 3 001 INFLUENT COMPOSITE 12/13/2023 @ 05:45 SAMPLE REP. DATE/TIME RESULTS LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYZED ANALYST 26 J 30 mg/L SM5210B 21ed 12/14/2023 21:23 HNB 38 2.0 mg/L SM2540D 2023 12/18/2023 8:11 KPG 430 10 mg1L SM2540B 18-21ed 12/14/2023 15:25 RPK 0.95 0.40 mg/L EPA 350.1 12/15/2023 9:46 VC 002 EFFLUENT COMPOSITE 12/13/2023 @ 06:00 SAMPLE REP. DATE/TIME RESULTS LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYZED ANALYST <10 10 mg/L SM5210B 2led 12/14/2023 21:23 BNB 10 2.0 mg/L SM2540D 2023 12/18/2023 8:11 KPG <0.050 0.050 mg/L EPA 300.0 12/14/2023 11:53 KPG 0.063 0.050 mg/L EPA300.0 12/14/2023 11:53 KPG 1.8 0.50 mg/L SM4500NOrg-D 18-2led 12/14/2023 13:00 JCD 003 EFFLUENT GRAB 12/13/2023 @ 06:15 SAMPLE REP. RESULTS LIMIT UNITS 0.80 0.50 mg/L DATE/TIME METHOD ANALYZED ANALYST EPA 1664A 12/18/2023 13:30 ZAC �Alp f Co C Client Into CpmpanyName: WSS Inc., dba WestC Address: M.I. ANALYTICAL 8paolallets In Ernrlronrr+antal Sarvlans city/ state / zip: Readi nit MA 01867 Telephone: 978-532-1900 Contact Person: � IL' U CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD z z b N I 41 Illinois Avenue 131 Coolidge St., Suite 105 Warwick, RI 02888-3007 Hudson, MA 01749-1331 800-937-2580 - Fax: 401-738-1970 800-937-2580 - Fax: 978-568-0078 H, U > •' 'fl 4.a N I Field Sample Identification *° CoIIected- - C Ilemcted l� C—I 4.l j" �Alp f Co C Sampson Services Suite 100 Fax: 978-977-0 c V a � O 'Zp N 0E m an. In o Client Into CpmpanyName: WSS Inc., dba WestC Address: 55 Walkers Brook Dr city/ state / zip: Readi nit MA 01867 Telephone: 978-532-1900 Contact Person: ChdstopherVigneau Sampson Services Suite 100 Fax: 978-977-0 c V a � O 'Zp N 0E m an. In o � �p d1 I co N o oa z c m ty Z O l C m .tom z O 4 N U z o ~ Z 'C fg Y c � Z 0 Q = L O � Qi o Fes- o_ � m I e}' o IL' U z z I N I z O H, O > g U. Project Name: Ocean ECIR P.O. Number: Report To: Chris Vigneau Sampled by: L iv V, Quote No: ct Information t— ,, Project Number: 25364 Phone: 978-818-9946 Fax: Email address vigneauc@wseinc.com — list: wsscompliance@wseinc.com — Tarn Around Time Normal I )( I EMAIL Report X 5-7 Business days. Rush -Date Due: I I Lab Use Only f": Sample Pick Up Only �LL AL Sampled; attach fieldhours Shipped on ice Project Comments Circle if applicable: GW -1, GW -2, GW -3, S-1, S-2, S-3 MCP Data Enhancement :QC Package? No Temp. Upon Receipt 7 y5- °C 1 1 Workorder N - 3 _-h:9 IC3S Containers: P=Poly, Gass, AG=AmberGlass, V Val, St --Sterile Pr sgrys es:A=AscorbicAdd, NH4=NH4CI, H --HCI, M=MeOH, N=HNOa NP=Nono, S=H2SO4, SB=N3HSO4, SH=NaOH, T=N228203,Z=ZnOAc Matrix Codes: GW=Groundwater, SW�Surface Water, WW=Wastewater, DW=Drinking Water, Soil, SL=Sludge, A=Air, B--Bulk/Solid, O= Page 1 of 1 COASTAL engineering co. TECHNICAL SERVICES 260 Cranberry Highway Orleans, MA 02653 508.255.6511 P 508.255.6700 F Orleans I Sandwich I Nantucket coastalengineeringcompany.com To: Jacquelyn Linehan, Property Mgr. Date: King's Landing Apartments Via: 1200 South State Street Brewster, MA 02631 via email: ;linehan.1 poahcommunities.com Subject: King's Landing Apartments 3 State Street Brewster, MA Permit #934-1 Plans Copy of Letter Specifications ®Other We are sending the following items: TRANSMITTAL 01/31/2024 Project No. WBR007.00 ®Email DPlck up Certified Fed Ex Copies Date No. Description 1 12/2023 934-1 Daily Log Sheet 1 12/21/2023 934-1 Monthly Discharge Report w/Laboratory Test Results 1 12/21/2023 934-1 Monthly Monitoring Well Report (Field-tested Data) _ 1 01/23/2024 934-1 eDEP Electronic Receipt These are transmitted as checked below: Qfor approval ®for your use ®as requested Qfor review 6 comment Remarks: Enclosed are the recent reporting forms for the wastewater treatment facility at the above -referenced location. Test results show high levels of Total Nitrogen that exceed the upper discharge limit (10 mg/L) due to levels of TKN. The average daily flow was approximately 9,867 gpd. None of the monitor wells exceeded the upper containment limits for any of the quarterly tested parameters. If you have any questions regarding this report or the WWTF, please do not hesitate to contact us. cc: Brewster Board of Health By: Chad A. Simmons, WWTPO CC Commission Joe Henderson, Horsley Witten Group, Inc. (via email) AquaPoint.3 LLC NOTE: If enclosures are not as noted, please contact us at (508) 255-6511 Orleans I Sandwich I Nantucket RPSOB.255.6511 260 Cranberry Highway, Orleans, MA 02653 1 coastalengineeringcompany.com Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1934 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit ti 2. Tax iden3r`ication Numoer DAILY LOG SHEET 2023 DEC DAILY LL3. Sampling Month & Frequency Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 C. Daily Readings/Analysis Information Effluent Reuse Irrigation Turbidity Influent pH Flow GPD Flow GPD Flow GPD 10,171 10,611 9,728 111,756 '9,945 9,328 10,020 9,612 10,043 10,767 9,696 9.133 .9.133 7,863 f 20 7,564 10,730 7,134 9,509 9,302 9,820 8,445 10,513 10,371 10,138 11,326 10,671 T 10,805 9,595 _ 11,142 10,268 ~ gdpols.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Effluent Chlorine pH Residual (mg/l) tN Intensity (%) Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 934 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. 06rmit Number Groundwater Permit ?. Tax identi kation Number DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT 2023 DEC MONTHLY LLI– 1 3. Sampling Month & Frequency • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS = Not Sampled 1. Parameter/Contaminant 2. Influent 3. Effluent 4. Effluent Method Units Detection limit BOD 1200 19.5 J 2.0 _ MG/L TSS f 9. 113. 5.0 MG/L TOTAL SOLIDS 480 MG/L AMMONIA -N 35.2 MG/L NITRATE -N 0.72 0.10 _ MG/L TOTAL NITROGEN(NO3+NO2+TKN) 22.56 0.050 MG/L OIL & GREASE IND I 14.0 MG/L infeffrp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Discharge Monitoring Report • Page 1 of 1 This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use —r pD-E. Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. ALPH--rA A N A L' 1 1 C A L ANALYTICAL REPORT Lab Number: L2375581 Client: Coastal Engineering Company 260 Cranberry Highway Route 6A Orleans, MA 02653 ATTN: Chad Simmons Phone: (508) 255-6511 Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 Report Date: 01/02/24 Serial No:01022410:43 The original project report/data package is held by Alpha Analytical. This report/data package is paginated and should be reproduced only in its entirety. Alpha Analytical holds no responsibility for results and/or data that are not consistent with the original. Certifications & Approvals: MA (M-MA086), NH NELAP (2064), CT (PH -0826), IL (200077), IN (C -MA -03), KY (KY98045), ME (MA00086), MD (348), NJ (MA935), NY (11148), NC (25700/666), OH (CL108), OR (MA -1316), PA (68-03671), RI (LA000065), TX (T104704476), VT (VT -0935), VA (460195), USDA (Permit #525-23-122-91930). Eight Walkup Drive, Westborough, MA 01581-1019 508-898-9220 (Fax) 508-898-9193 800-624-9220 - www.alphalab.com Page 1 of 19 Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2375581-01 Date Date Client ID: INFLUENT (COMPOSITE) MDL Sample Location: 3 STATE ROAD BREWSTER, MA Sample Depth: Analyst NA 1.3 Matrix: Water 121,25406 DEW Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL General Chemistry Westborough Lab MRS Solids, Total 480 mg/1 13 Solids, Total Suspended 89. mg/1 10 Nitrogen, Ammonia 35.2 mg/1 0.375 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 46.1 mg/1 1.50 BOD, 5 day 200 mg/I 30 Page 5 of 19 Serial No:01022410:43 Lab Number: L2375581 Report Date: 01/02/24 Date Collected: 12/21/23 08:00 Date Received: 12/21/23 Field Prep: Not Specified Dilution Date Date Analytical MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst NA 1.3 12/27/23 03:10 121,25406 DEW NA 2 - 12/26/23 09:20 121,2540D MRS 5 12/29/2318:17 12/2912319:13121,4500NH3-BH AT 5 12/2912308:58 12/29/2321:08 121,4500NH3-H AT NA 15 12/22/23 06:15 12/27/23 01:30 121,52106 OCF Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2375581-02 Date Analytical Client ID: EFFLUENT (COMPOSITE) Prepared Sample Location: 3 STATE ROAD BREWSTER, MA Sample Depth: NA 1 12/26/23 09:20 Matrix: Water -- 10 12/29/2318:17 Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL General Chemistry - Westborough Lab 12/22/23 07:06 44,353.2 Solids, Total Suspended 13. mg/I 5.0 Nitrogen, Ammonia 18.8 mg/I 0.750 Nitrogen, Nitrite 0.44 mg/l 0.050 Nitrogen, Nitrate 0.72 mg/I 0.10 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 21.4 mg/I 0.600 BOD, 5 day 9.5 mg/I 2.0 Page 6 of 19 Serial No:01022410:43 Lab Number: L2375581 Report Date: 01/02/24 Date Collected: 12/21/23 08:00 Date Received: 12/21/23 Field Prep: Not Specified Dilution Date Date Analytical MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst NA 1 12/26/23 09:20 121,2540D MRS -- 10 12/29/2318:17 12/29/2319:25121,4500NH3-131-1 AT 1 12/22/23 07:06 44,353.2 KAF -- 1 - 12/22/23 07:06 44,353.2 KAF 2 12/29/23 08:58 12/29/23 21:09 121,4500NH3-H AT NA 1 12/22/23 06:15 12/27/23 01:30 121,521013 OCF " "I Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2375581-03 Client ID: EFFLUENT (GRAB) Sample Location: 3 STATE ROAD BREWSTER, MA Sample Depth: Method Analyst Matrix: Water Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL General Chemistry Westborough Lab Oil & Grease, Hem-Grav ND mg/l 4.0 Page 7 of 19 Serial No:01022410:43 Lab Number: L2375581 Report Date: 01/02/24 Date Collected: 12/21/23 08:30 Date Received: 12/21/23 Field Prep: Not Specified Dilution Date Date Analytical MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst -- 1 12/27/23 20:33 12/27/23 23:55 140,16648 QJM Serial No:01022410:43 CHAIN OF CUSTODY FACE 1 OF 1 � Date RetidInLab: � � � 1 � Ai`�HAJo Project Information Report I formationData • Inf, A:m A I TT CA L Deliver a- FAX EMAIL ❑ Same as tNesmba+auai. MA ula leM. MA — — Project Name Kings Landing Brewster ADEx ® Addl nebumb3as TEA, 5M-59"220 WL: sOa•az2-r Ott — I Regulatory . far 7r.�'1•�r,]FAX- Client• 'a a rt Limits FTC Project Location: 3 Stale Road 13romter MA 20wFed Pr aram Cr�nrta Client Coastal Engineering Co.. Ire. J Project mak, WRR ,00 e Address: 260 Cranbeny Hinh va} _ _ �Project,Mar6iger, Chad A. Simmons I Yes � Wo_ are MCPAnal�qcmti alelhc siRlquIred? - Orleans. MA 02653 _ l�{pNA q►�ula tE �J 71 Efl srrr.4 Yes ' Na lkre CT RCP •:i epgonable Confidence 1' Frhooe: 503255-6511 ANALYSIS Fax. 50B 255-0704 Standard CI Rush toKY IF PRE RPFrit3Y , Email: csimmon oecoaoer,4tl_com _ ] Tk"samplesrwoagonPMADuslyanalyzadbyA,p4 Ow Date, Arne, Other Project Specafic RequirementslCommente0etecUon Limits: ALPHA Lab IC Sam pie ID Calliodan sample Sampler's (Leo Use arAy) � fiaGe liens MaW. instals 1(]J Influent (Corrin osltel 12//.21 . NO -80 � WW OAS PLEASE ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOVE] IS YOUR PROJECT IIA ICP or QCT RCP? rere+eo.a►agiP - .12121hm-XIO-wn 1 tV21J23 Oal- I i 2 no F -01 FbA M �� K2RAjJrL SAMPLE HANDLING r0tralran t3 Dane © Not Needed Q L@b so d4 iwssenraft r ® Lab made (Preece specary bedo," $"IN eaaawa ednwnrnrs - - 0 111c] 0 I� U Lf 1 M r T SII Z I 0 Y TLF- CT 11 0 Ll cl 7T M �Nyi ty Container Type F F - Z in x I zS :4 - I - m Z o _bhMme � ® t@ slam Until arty am ptel, ee are A95dd. ANs5mp4el. +y g 6� - t^ ]j 2 no F -01 FbA M �� K2RAjJrL SAMPLE HANDLING r0tralran t3 Dane © Not Needed Q L@b so d4 iwssenraft r ® Lab made (Preece specary bedo," $"IN eaaawa ednwnrnrs - - 0 111c] 0 I� U Lf u LJ L1 I — Y TLF- CT 11 0 Ll cl 7T 1 y Container Type F F - _ - Mang pro Ceerly, teglwy Preservative A K - - - I - and ewWa,ay� Samples can - Relb:rqui0ed By, ImhAff i,a m f Recelwed By; o _bhMme I— be PM@d in and bumaroenabmedookW, not. slam Until arty am ptel, ee are A95dd. ANs5mp4el. +y g 6� - t^ ]j 'Mev." d ym nk-r&t1a A,ptra'aPayrnenmYerms. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection '934 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit I _ -.ax idenVication Number MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT 2024 QUARTERLY4 LLI 3. Sampling Month & Frequency • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled • DRY = Not enough water in well to sample. Parameter/Contaminant HW -1 HW -2 HW -3 HW -4 Units Well #: 1 Well #: 2 Well #: 3 Well #: 4 NITRATE -N 1.4 1.4F--1 ,DRY MG/L TOTAL NITROGEN(NO3+NO2+TK1 1.4 _ 11.4 _ _ 1.1 'DRY MG/L TOTAL PHOSPHORUS AS P ND 110.917 051 = j !DRY MG/L ORTHO PHOSPHATE 0.025 0.005 1 10.008 _I I DRY _ I MG/L Well #: 5 Well #: 6 < mwdgwp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Monitoring Well Data for Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 93 Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number Groundwater Permit 2. -lax identi-kation � umber MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT 2023 DEC MONTHLY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled • DRY = Not enough water in well to sample. Parameter/Contaminant HW4 HW -2 HW -3 HW -4 Units Well #: 1 Well #: 2 Well #: 3 Well #: 4 Well #: 5 Well #: 6 PH 6.41 j [6.18 16.20 11DRY i S.U. STATIC WATER LEVEL 20.67 19.41 118.30 I I DRY FEET" SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE 600 1100 1700 I IDRY UMHOS/C mwdgwp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Monitoring Well Data for Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. A N A L 1 C A L ANALYTICAL REPORT Lab Number: L2375595 Client: Coastal Engineering Company 260 Cranberry Highway Route 6A Orleans, MA 02653 ATTN: Chad Simmons Phone: (508) 255-6511 Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 Report Date: 01/02/24 Serial No:01022415:29 The original project report/data package is held by Alpha Analytical. This report/data package is paginated and should be reproduced only in its entirety. Alpha Analytical holds no responsibility for results and/or data that are not consistent with the original. Certifications & Approvals: MA (M-MA086), NH NELAP (2064), CT (PH -0826), IL (200077), IN (C -MA -03), KY (KY98045), ME (MA00086), MD (348), NJ (MA935), NY (11148), NC (25700/666), OH (CL108), OR (MA -1316), PA (68-03671), RI (LA000065), TX (T104704476), VT (VT -0935), VA (460195), USDA (Permit #525-23-122-91930). Eight Walkup Drive, Westborough, MA 01581-1019 508-898-9220 (Fax) 508-898-9193 800-624-9220 - www.alphalab.com Page 1 of 19 Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2375595-01 Date Analytical Client ID: HW -1 Prepared Analyzed Sample Location: 3 STATE ROAD BREWSTER, MA Sample Depth: 12/22/23 05:06 44,353.2 Matrix: Water 12/22/23 05:06 Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL General Chemistry - Westborough_ Lab 121,4500NH3-H KEP Nitrogen, Nitrite ND mg/I 0.050 Nitrogen, Nitrate 1.4 mg/I 0.10 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl ND mg/I 0.300 Phosphorus, Total ND mg/I 0.010 Phosphorus, Orthophosphate 0.025 mg/1 0.005 Page 6 of 19 Serial No:01022415:29 Lab Number: L2375595 Report Date: 01/02/24 Date Collected: 12/21/23 13:00 Date Received: 12/21/23 Field Prep: Not Specified Dilution Date Date Analytical MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst -- 1 12/22/23 05:06 44,353.2 KAF -- 1 12/22/23 05:06 44,353.2 KAF -- 1 12/29/23 22:00 01/02/24 11:45 121,4500NH3-H KEP 1 12/27/2313:37 12/27/2314:46 121,4500P -E RDS 1 - 12/22/23 02:05 121,4500P -E CAR Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2375595-02 Client ID: HW -2 Field Prep: Not Specified Sample Location: 3 STATE ROAD BREWSTER, MA Sample Depth: MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Matrix: Water 12/22/23 05:18 44,353.2 KAF Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL General Chemistry - Westborough Lab KEP 5 Nitrogen, Nitrite ND mg/I 0.050 Nitrogen, Nitrate 1.4 mg/I 0.10 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl ND mg/I 0.300 Phosphorus, Total 0.917 mg/I 0.050 Phosphorus, Orthophosphate 0.005 mg/I 0.005 Page 7 of 19 Serial No:01022415:29 Lab Number: L2375595 Report Date: 01/02/24 Date Collected: 12/21/23 12:30 Date Received: 12/21/23 Field Prep: Not Specified Dilution Date Date Analytical MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst 1 12/22/23 05:18 44,353.2 KAF 1 - 12/22/23 05:18 44,353.2 KAF 1 12/29/2322:00 01/02/2411:46 121,4500NH3-H KEP 5 12/27/2313:37 12/27/2314:49 121,4500P -E RDS 1 - 12/22/23 02:05 121,4500P -E CAR Project Name: KINGS LANDING BREWSTER Project Number: WBR007.00 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L2375595-03 Client ID: HW -3 Sample Location: 3 STATE ROAD BREWSTER, MA Sample Depth: Matrix: Water Parameter Result Qualifier Units RL General Chemistry - Westborough Lab_ Nitrogen, Nitrite ND mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate 1.1 mg/I Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl ND mg/l Phosphorus, Total 0.051 mg/l Phosphorus, Orthophosphate 0.008 mg/l Page 8 of 19 Serial No:01022415:29 Lab Number: L2375595 Report Date: 01/02/24 Date Collected: 12/21/23 12:45 Date Received: 12/21/23 Field Prep: Not Specified Dilution Date Date Analytical MDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst 0.050 1 12/22/23 05:19 44,353.2 KAF 0.10 1 12/22/23 05:19 44,353.2 KAF 0.300 1 12/29/2322:00 01/02/2413:22 121,4500NH3-H KEP 0.010 1 12/27/2313:37 12/27/2314:49 121,4500P -E RDS 0.005 1 - 12/22/23 02:06 121,4500P -E CAR CHAIN OF CUSTODY PAGE t OF 1 i1�36a�irProject Information qwpnon Z J5 I Y f L` K L Date Reed in Lab: ALPHA Lab ID I Sample ID (Lab Use Drily) "W-2 HVV-3 HW -4 WA - Well D h PLEASE ANSWER QUEST1OblS ABOVIEI IS YOUR PROJECT MA MCP or CT RCPT" ,raw ran.wa o.726,h Date I Time ,2r21t t aal=M 17121123 121012M CL 0 (3 Samplm I Sampler' ACCra FAX u ' WwOoorou9h, SAA iArn>rmr1d,VA Project Hama: Kings Landing Brewster (�ADEx; TEL! 53&M9220 TMBoa-a2z-ss�o inlliats � FAC! iu4040 V t"AY-tli- - 1-I I--1 Project Location: 3 Slate Roved Brewster MA Sradcai�scf Pram Client: Coastal Eni lineerl-i Co," Inc._ Pro;6otM WBRO07.01) ID _ — ©. Address: 260 Cmnb-•1:• Hl ; • • •. _ y Protect Manam-r-, Chad A. Simmons O Yes No — gleans MA02653 _ � ALPL460ippAge. 2611 elreyl ® Yes i rl tso Phone: SU 255.6511 Turn -Around Time ANALYSIS fax:- ►08 255 $ADO _ Standard Rush IoNLY rF Prl£,4PPROM1IED, l Email: csirnmans_ - ecca com _� IJLJ Ttma■8ampfthave beanPravlWillyanShtedbyAlAhir Dere Date: Time; m OFhar Project Specific RequirenlientSICOMMentsfDetection Limns: � Mon! tor weal HW -4 was dry. e ALPHA Lab ID I Sample ID (Lab Use Drily) "W-2 HVV-3 HW -4 WA - Well D h PLEASE ANSWER QUEST1OblS ABOVIEI IS YOUR PROJECT MA MCP or CT RCPT" ,raw ran.wa o.726,h Date I Time ,2r21t t aal=M 17121123 121012M CL 0 (3 Samplm I Sampler' Serial No:01022415:29 ALPHA Job #: m4roiRep .CiRR'FAJNTY- REA50NALNLE GONFIDENCF SAMPLE HAr OL04G F4ttragon 0 DOM flNa Weodw �] Lab lade Pmewymaon Lab to d4 (Preaarr s;—trr bloom GVV ACCra u LJ • u s H iA01rix inlliats � � Serial No:01022415:29 ALPHA Job #: m4roiRep .CiRR'FAJNTY- REA50NALNLE GONFIDENCF SAMPLE HAr OL04G F4ttragon 0 DOM flNa Weodw �] Lab lade Pmewymaon Lab to d4 (Preaarr s;—trr bloom GVV ACCra u LJ • u I� u u u I--1 n' 0,, 110 ® . ID ©. GW ACS _� IJLJ � ® IAF '11,113.4 L31 F1 lL1 101 L1, Contalnet T•,;)® P P t3raservative Q lokmv lir" cmerly, mob* and aorrvata4y. setw1as Mnot Id By, Daw7lrrreReceindBy! •. Datemme ba 1a99ad 1n ped Wmonaindlime clock w4lnat — — l� UM— ��` _�� - - — �, ze � —r, �` . atartunlll ary,unbM)ieks are nucl.gd� ANsamyles rK;_ / � 5' , wbmitled art 4*10d to AWPhai Payment 7mm, 1/24/24, 9:47 AM rill F 9). MassDEP's Online Filing System M� �Q�'� Fps+i�7s My Profile Help Notifica Receipt Summary/Receipt eDEP - MassDEP's OnlineFiling System Your submission is complete. Thank you for using DEP's online reporting system. You can select "My eDEP" to see a list of your transactions. DEP Transaction ID: 1667489 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 9:46:57 AM Other Email: DEP Transaction ID: 1667489 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 9:46:57 AM Other Email: DEP Transaction ID: 1667489 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 9:46:57 AM Other Email: DEP Transaction ID: 1667489 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 9:46:57 AM Other Email : DEP Transaction ID: 1667489 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 9:46:57 AM Other Email: Form Name: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Facility Information: Tax Identification Number: 352432096 location: 3 STATE STREET Address: BREWSTER ZIP: 02631 Daily Log Sheet(2023 DEC DAILY) Form Name: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Facility Information: Tax Identification Number: 352432096 location: 3 STATE STREET Address: BREWSTER ZIP: 02631 MassDEP Home i Contact i Privacy Policy Usemame:CASDMR Nickname: COASTAL260 Forms Signature Receipt print receipt Exit https://edep.dep.mass.gov/eDEP/Pages/PrintReceipt.aspx 112 1/24/24, 9:47 AM eDEP - MassDEP's OnlineFiling System Discharge Monitoring Report(1 - 2023 Dec Monthly) Form Name: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Facility Information: Tax Identification Number: 352432096 location: 3 STATE STREET Address: BREWSTER ZIP: 02631 Monitoring Well Data Report(1 - 2024 Quarterly 1) Form Name: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Facility Information: Tax Identification Number: 352432096 location: 3 STATE STREET Address: BREWSTER ZIP: 02631 Monitoring Well Data Report(1 - 2023 Dec Monthly) Form Name: Comments My eDEP MassDEP Home I Contact I Privacy Policy MassDEP's Online Filing System ver.17.2.8.0© 2023 MassDEP https://edep.dep.mass.gov/eDEP/Pages/PrintReceipt.aspx 2/2 COASTAL engineering co. TECHNICAL SERVICES 260 Cranberry Highway Orleans, MA 02653 508.255.6511 P 508.255.6700 F Orleans I Sandwich I Nantucket coastalengineeringcompany.com To: Brewster Town Hall Board of Health Department 2198 Main St Brewster, MA 02631 Subject: Town of Brewster Formerly Cape Cod Sea Camps 3057 Main Street Brewster, MA GWDP 977-0 ❑ Plans [:] Copy of Letter We are sending the following items: TRANSMITTAL Date: 01/25/2024 Project No. C16845.07 Via: ❑ Specifications ®1st Class Mail Pick up oCertified F]Fed Ex ® Other Copies Date No. Description 1 12/2023 C16845.07 Daily Log Sheet (Not field-tested — Camp is Closed) 1 12/2023 C16845.07 Discharge Monitor Report (Not sampled — Camp is Closed) 1 01/24/2024 C16845.07 eDEP Electronic Receipt These are transmitted as checked below: F-Ifor approval ®for your use []as requested F]for review 5 comment 0 Remarks: Enclosed are the recent monthly reporting forms for the system at the above referenced location under GWDP 977-0. The laundromat has been shut down since the camp closed. No flow or pH was able to be recorded and the distribution box was not sampled. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Cc: plombardi(@brewster-ma.gov By: John G. Schnaible NOTE: If enclosures are not as noted, please contact us at (508) 255-6511 260 Cranberry Highway, Orleans, MA 026S3 Orleans I Sandwich I Nantucket P 508.2SS.6511= ' ' - - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1977 _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program 1. Permit Number r Groundwater Permit 2 Tax identification Number DAILY LOG SHEET 2023 DEC DAILY 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Daily Readings/Analysis Information Date Effluent Reuse Irrigation Turbidity Influent pH Effluent Chlorine Uv Flow GPD Flow GPD Flow GPD pH Residual Intensity (mg1I) (%) 1 NS _I _ NS 2 NS i NS 3 NS �I = NS _ 4 NS NS 5 NS _ NS 6 NS NS 7 NS NS 8 NS �. _� NS — —� 9 NS I NS 10 NS I NS 11 NS _ NS 12 NS �T NS 13 NS I NS 14 NS NS 15 NS NS 16 NS NS 17 NS� I NS 18 NS , NS 19 NS — � I NS J — 20 NS a �I I NS 21 NS I NS 22 NS NS 23 NS i I NS 24 NS I NS J 25 Ng NS 26 NS NS 27 NS NS _ 28 NS NS I 29 NS NS 30 INS� NS 31 INS NS _ gdpols.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Groundwater Permit Daily Log Sheet • Page 1 of 1 - -- - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection _ Bureau of Resource Protection - Groundwater Discharge Program Groundwater Permit r MONITORING WELL DATA REPORT 977 1. Permit Number 2. Tax identification Number 2023 DEC MONTHLY _ 3. Sampling Month & Frequency C. Contaminant Analysis Information • For "0", below detection limit, less than (<) value, or not detected, enter "ND" • TNTC = too numerous to count. (Fecal results only) • NS =Not Sampled • DRY = Not enough water in well to sample. Parameter/Contaminant LAUNDRY EFFLU Units Well #: 1 Well #: 2 Well #: 3 Well #: 4 TSS INS MG/L OIL & GREASE NS MG/L FOAMING AGENTS (MBAs) NS MG/L Well #: 5 Well #: 6 mwdgwp-blank.doc • rev. 09/15/15 Monitoring Well Data for Groundwater Permit • Page 1 of 1 1/24/24, 1:21 PM MassDEP's Online Filing System Receipt Summary/Receipt eDEP - MassDEP's OnlineFiling System Your submission is complete. Thank you for using DEP's online reporting system. You can select "My eDEP" to see a list of your transactions. DEP Transaction ID: 1668307 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 1:20:50 PM Other Email: DEP Transaction ID: 1668307 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 1:20:50 PM Other Email: DEP Transaction ID: 1668307 Date and Time Submitted: 1/24/2024 1:20:50 PM Other Email: Form Name: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Facility Information: Tax Identification Number: 043070847 location: 3057 MAIN STREET Address: BREWSTER ZIP: 02631 Daily Log Sheet(2023 DEC DAILY) Form Name: Groundwater Discharge Monitoring Report Forms Facility Information: Tax Identification Number: 043070847 location: 3057 MAIN STREET Address: BREWSTER ZIP: 02631 Monitoring Well Data Report(1 - 2023 Dec Monthly) Form Name: Comments MassDEP Home I Contact I Privacy Policy ,I Forms Signature Receipt print receipt Exit My eDEP MassDEP Home I Contact I Privacy Policy MassDEP's Online Filing System ver 17.2.8.0© 2023 MassDEP https://edep.dep.mass.gov/eDEP/Pages/PrintReceipt.aspx 111 J.M. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. Engineering & Land Surveying Services 1573 Main Street, 2nd Floor, P.O. Box 1773 Brewster, MA 02631 (508) 896-6601 Fax (508) 896-6602 f _ E I.V E D DATE: . de �r `._._...._ ...,,,,,.,.-I 01/16/2024 � :i=_,a� rt LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Shipping Method: Regular Mail 0 Federal Express ❑ Certified Mail ❑ UPS ❑ Priority Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ Express Mail ❑ Hand Deliver ❑ COPIES DATE 1 1 12/14/23 DESCRIPTION DEP Approved Inspection Form SeptiTech Form Lab Results For review and comment: ❑ REMARKS: cc: John M. O'Reilly, P.E., P.L.S. + Al HaO W Client From: GJB JOB NUMBER: I8082W REGARDING: White Rock Commons Subdivision, White Rock Road, Brewster For approval: ❑ As Requested: ❑ For your use: IZI If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once LFU W;Z�eron Waste Water Systems Site/Address: White Rock Commons Subdivision White Rock Road Brewster, MA 02631 Date: 12/14/2023 Time: 8:40 am Rep: Greg Brehm 1. Remove lids & covers on processor. Visually inspect media & spray pattern. GJB (Initial) 2. Exercise entire system in maintenance mode. a. Recirculation pump(s) b. Pumpback pump(s) c. Discharge pump(s) 3. Perform maintenance/cleaning tasks required for proper operation of unit. a. Spray headers b. Media c. Screen 4. Take effluent sample from sample tube 5. Record following values from controller read-out (Discharge Pump) Days Runtime: 14 14 Hours Runtime: 22 21 Seconds Runtime: 1446.9 2675.7 6. Record controller program version: Commercial 7. Record controller firmware version: V121 GJB (Initial) GJB _ (Initial) GJB (Initial) GJB (Initial) GJB _ (Initial) GJB (Initial) 8. List parts and supplies used: _ GJB (Initial) 9. Return system to "run" mode GJB _ (Initial) 10. Re -install covers and lids on processor. GJB (Initial) 11. Check air intake muffler for obstruction and proper draw. GJB (Initial) The system no operating correctly mechanically. Recirculation pump #1 was bad. Replace pump on 1218123. General Notes and Remarks: Electrical issue inside control panel still exists. Need to call in electrician to diagnose. Effluent quality failed field tests due to high turbidity. C:1Users4odmV.ppData\LocolNticromfi\Windom\Temporary IntemetFilm\Contact.Outlook\LQ2TPDQY�septiteh.doc _ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 IlA Treatment and Disposal Systems (203) 312 - 3484 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider J. M. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. O&M Firm 1573 Main Street - P.O. Box 1773 Street Address Brewster MA_ City State (508) 896 - 6601 ext. Telephone Number Greg Brehm _ Certified Operator Name 02631 Zip 16149 Certification Number C. Facility/System Information BREW-Sou157-Sep Septitech DEP ID Manufacturer ID Unknown Janua ?01016 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting Seasonal Residence — used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes D. Operating Information 12/14/2023 Inspection Date Sludge Depth (to be checked yearly) 06525 Zip 02631 Zip M3000N Model Number ❑ Remedial 1. 08/25/2023 Previous Inspection Date Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No t5aiom.doc • rev. 04-11-13 Page 1 of 3 A. Installation Important: When White Rock Commons Subdivision_ filling out forms Owner on the computer, use only the tab White Rock Road key to move your Facility Street Address cursor- do not Brewster use the return _ City key. Mailing address of owner, if different: - P.O. Box 3843 Street Address/PO Box: New Haven CT City State (203) 312 - 3484 ext. Telephone Number B. Authorized Service Provider J. M. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. O&M Firm 1573 Main Street - P.O. Box 1773 Street Address Brewster MA_ City State (508) 896 - 6601 ext. Telephone Number Greg Brehm _ Certified Operator Name 02631 Zip 16149 Certification Number C. Facility/System Information BREW-Sou157-Sep Septitech DEP ID Manufacturer ID Unknown Janua ?01016 Installation Date Start of Operation Approval Type: ® General ❑ Provisional ❑ Piloting Seasonal Residence — used less than 6 mo./year: ❑ Yes D. Operating Information 12/14/2023 Inspection Date Sludge Depth (to be checked yearly) 06525 Zip 02631 Zip M3000N Model Number ❑ Remedial 1. 08/25/2023 Previous Inspection Date Pumping Recommended ❑ Yes ® No t5aiom.doc • rev. 04-11-13 Page 1 of 3 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection LL71 Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems E. Field Testing Field Inspection: Color: ❑ gray ❑ brown ❑ clear ❑ Other (specify): Odor: ❑ musty ® earthy ❑ moldy Effluent Solids: ® no ❑ some ❑ offensive ❑ turbid b pH 7.0 SU DO 3.0 mg/L Turbidity OVR NTU _ 6 to 9 2 or greater 40 or less Should a Remedial or General Use system fail the Field Testing, effluent samples shall be collected per Standard Methods and analyzed for BOD and TSS. F. Sampling Information Samples Taken: ❑ Influent ® Effluent Commercial systems or systems with a design flow of 2000 gpd and greater, and General Use nitrogen reducing systems: gpd Parameters sampled: ❑ pH ® BOD ❑ CBOD ® TSS ® TN ❑ Other (list below) See attached lab results Other -1- Other 2 Other 3 G. Inspection and Maintenance Description of any maintenance performed since previous inspection & during this inspection: Maintenance completed per.manufacturer's checklist. Recirculation pump #1 is bad and replaced. Electrical issue inside panel exists, need electrician to da nose. Notes and Comments: The system is operating correctly mechanically t5aiom.doc • rev. 04-11-13 Page 2 of 3 ' I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 4 Bureau of Resource Protection - Title 5 DEP Approved Inspection and O&M Form for Title 5 I/A Treatment and Disposal Systems H. Certification I certify: I have inspected the sewage treatment and disposal system at the address above, have conducted the required Field Testing and/or sample collection in accordance with Standard Methods, have completed this report and the attached technology operation and maintenance checklist, and the information reportep is,true, accurate, and complete as of the time of the inspection. I am a Massachusetts certif�doaerator Gn ncordance with 257 CMR 2.00. 01/16/2024 Operator Signature ;' - ''- Date 41 System owner must submit this report, technology O&M checklist, and any required sampling results to the local board of health as follows for each inspection performed: Remedial Use — by January 315t of each year for the previous calendar year Piloting Use - within 45 days of inspection date Provisional Use — by March 31th of each year for the previous 12 months General Use — by September 30th of each year for the previous 12 months Send to: Department of Environmental Protection Attention: Title 5 Program One Winter Street, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02108 t5aiom.doc • rev. 04-11-13 Page 3 of 3 Biochemical Oxygen Demand - 5 Day incubation ITEM RESULT UNITS RL MCL BOD * [11 42 mg/L 10 Nitrate analysis ITEM CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS RL Barnstable County Health NITRATE Laboratory (M-MA009) 't C. 11 ReEort2re -ared for. 10 Order #: G23005811 12/15/2023 J.M. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc RESULT Report Dated: 1/11/2024 ITEM J.M. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. UNITS Description: 8082W MCL PO Box 1743 ND mg/L 0.050 Brewster, MA, 02631 Laborator•i ID#• Matrix: Waste Water Sample#: G23005811-001 Sampled: 12/14/2023 10:25:00 By: GJB Collection Address: Received: 12/14/2023 13:43:00 By: tconnelly Sample Location: White Rock Rd HOA, Brewster Turn Around: Standard Biochemical Oxygen Demand - 5 Day incubation ITEM RESULT UNITS RL MCL BOD * [11 42 mg/L 10 Nitrate analysis ITEM RESULT UNITS RL MCL NITRATE 0.41 mg/L 0.10 10 Nitrite analysis 12/15/2023 ITEM RESULT UNITS ITEM RESULT UNITS RL MCL NITRITE ND mg/L 0.050 1 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen analysis TESTED TIME JRG ITEM RESULT UNITS TKN 54 mg/L Total Suspended Solids analysis CL 12/15/2023 ITEM RESULT UNITS Total Suspended Solids 34 mg/L Analyte analysis subcontracted to the following laboratories: * [1] Alpha Analytical Westborough - M-MA086 Approved By: Dan White On: 1111/2024 RL MCL 0.25 RL MCL 2.0 METHOD # SM 5210B METHOD # EPA 300.0 METHOD # EPA 300.0 METHOD # EPA 351.2 METHOD # SM 2540D ANALYST TESTED TIME JRG 12/15/2023 ANALYST TESTED TIME CL 12/1512023 ANALYST TESTED TIME CL 12/15/2023 ANALYST AB ANALYST LAP TESTED TIME 1/9/2024 13:57 TESTED TIME 12/1412024 ND = None Detected RL= Reporting Limit MCL= Maximum Contaminant Level MDL= Minimum Detection Limit 3195 Main Street, PO. Box 427, Barnstable, MA 02630 Ph: 508-375-6605 - www.capecod.gov Page 1 of 1 L Q W V_ PublicHeaffli I S P AT C H M� Prevent. Promote. Protect. W aResources and Information about Local Public Health NACCHO Abstract Deadline Extended for NACCH0360 2024 We understand just how busy you are supporting your local communities, which is why NACCHO is extending the call for abstracts for the 2024 NACCH0360 Annual Conference to January 8 at 11:59 PM PT. Please take this opportunity to showcase recent program initiatives, research findings, and other information of interest and importance to public health. Please note that there will be no further deadline extensions. Thank you to everyone who has already submitted an abstract. Because of you, NACCH0360 continues to be the premier annual destination for our community to reenergize while gaining the knowledge, resources, and relationships necessary for public health professionals. Submit an abstract at https://www.naccho360.org/abstracts. NACCHO President's Corner, "Gun Violence Is an Epidemic; It's Time To Treat It Like One" Read the latest President's Corner Column, "Gun Violence Is An Epidemic; It's Time To Treat It Like One;' where NACCHO's President, Dr. Pramod Dwivedi, discusses the complicated components behind the gun violence epidemic, as well as shares research regarding how Americans view the issue. View the article at https://www.naccho.org/about/board/presidents-corner. NACCHO's Podcast From Washington: Harassment of Public Health Officials During COVID-19 and Its Lasting Impact In the latest Podcast from Washington, NACCHO's Victoria Van de Vate, Director of Government Affairs, and Lauren Mastroberardino, Government Affairs Senior Specialist, provide a congressional update on upcoming government funding challenges. They also discuss recent letters that NACCHO sent to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion on Healthy People 2030 objectives and to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Division of STD Prevention about its proposed guidelines on the use of doxycycline as post -exposure prophylaxis to prevent STI transmission. Listen to the podcast at https.//naccho.libsyn.com/podcast/podcast-from-washington- harassment-of-public-health-officials-during-covid-19-and-its-lasting-impact. 2024 Samuel J. Crumbine Consumer Protection Award for Excellence in Food Protection Named for one of America's most renowned health officers, Samuel J. Crumbine, MD (1862-1954), the Crumbine Award is bestowed upon local environmental health jurisdictions that demonstrate unsurpassed achievement in providing outstanding food protection services to their communities. Since 2001, the award has highlighted innovative programs and methods that reduce or eliminate the occurrence of foodborne illnesses, recognize the importance of food protection at the local level, and stimulate public interest in foodservice sanitation. For more information, visit naccho.org/blog/articles/2024-crumbine- award. The deadline to submit entries for the 2024 award is March 15. In the Spotlight... Register for the 2024 Public Health Law Practitioners Convening in New Orleans In the face of limited funding and recent shifts in public health authority, many in the Public Health Law field find themselves grappling with challenges in performing their vital roles effectively. Seize the opportunity to address these obstacles and register for the 2024 Public Health Law Practitioners Convening. Join NACCHO and CDC officials in New Orleans from April 30—May 2. Secure your spot today and register at https://phlawpractitioners. org/registration/register2. New 2024 Call Register for the Informational Webinar on Wednesday, for Proposals: January 17 at 3:00 PM ET at https://ucdenver.zoom.us/ Systems & Services webinar/register/WN_GMMWQH8UTdyioBFkh6gLaA#/. Research to Address Systemic Racism -' Sexual Health Services In The Robert Wood • Jails Webinar Series Johnson Foundation has released a new research Wondering how STIs are being funding opportunity through the Systems for Action addressed in jail settings? If so, Research Program. This year's funding opportunity join NACCHO for its "Sexual Health will award studies rigorously testing innovative Services In Jails" webinar series. approaches in helping medical, social, and public This first session will take place on Wednesday, January 10 at health systems work together to dismantle 2:00 PM EST. Several jail projects across the country, including systemic racism and address the health and social Yuba County Health and Human Services, Northern Nevada needs of people experiencing health inequities. Public Health, and Orange County Corrections/Health Services Each study supported by the S4A program must Department will be discussed. During the webinar, information examine a novel approach to systems alignment on how these jail projects have been implemented, key staff that engages partners from medical care, public involved, and lessons learned/best practices will be shared. health, and social services systems in collaborative Register for part 1 at https://naccho.zoom.us/webinar/register/ efforts to improve health equity. This 2024 Call for . WN_In3pcGOESdS8u9mDf99HEQ#/registration. Part two will Proposals will provide funding for a new cohort take place on Wednesday, February 21 at 2:00 PM EST. During this of research studies to produce new, actionable session, several jail projects across the country, including Seattle - evidence to align across the three systems to King County, Pueblo County, Alabama Department of Public address systemic racism. Applicants may apply Health, and San Francisco Department of Public Health, will be for one of two available funding categories: highlighted. Similar to the first session, how these projects were • Developmental Studies (a pilot study) developed/implemented, key staff involved, and lessons learned/ • Impact Studies (should have best practices will be shared. Register for part 2 at https://naccho. preliminary research results) zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_VonNOv3eQyWb3WkEYTNdtw#/. This funding opportunity will be a two-stage proposal process with an anticipated deadline for New Infographic: America's Letters of Intent (LOI) on February 7. Invitations for Local Public Health Landscape full proposals will be in late March 2024. Register I ! during the COVID-19 Era for the Informational Webinar on Tuesday, January View the first snapshot of data from 9, at 3:00 PM ET at https://ucdenver.zoom.us/ NACCHO's 2022 National Profile of webinar/register/WN_1423RzO9SW2efNaLjrr5zQ#/. Local Health Department (Profile) h PAlir Health Dim;trh . hmmry )f1?4 study. Data from NACCHO's 2020 Forces of Change (FOC) survey are also featured to highlight LHD capacity and activities throughout the pandemic. Spoiler alert: 71 % of LHDs were targets of harassment since March 2020. Access the infographic at bit.ly/Profileinfographic2022. Equity Considerations for Local Health Departments on Opioid Settlement Funds Checklist The Legal Action Center (LAC), with support from NACCHO, has crafted the Equity Considerations for Local Health Departments on Opioid Settlement Funds Checklist. This valuable resource aims to guide county and city health officials through decision-making for the allocation and distribution of opioid settlement funds, highlighting health equity principles such as community engagement, oversight and accountability, and cultural humility. Access the checklist at https://www.naccho.org/ uploads/card-images/custom/Equity-Consideration s- March 25-28,2024 for-LDH-Opioid-Settlement-Funds_pdf-1.pdf. e�> Congenital Syphilis ' ° a ;j Community of Practice r� Fn 5 0 e "..tea Join NACCHO's Congenital Syphilis # o _ (CS) Community of Practice (CoP)! Through this opportunity, LHD e ' O staff can engage in ' r.'`�? learning collaborative°��-Q and knowledge sharing activities that enhance their capacity to implement or scale -up interventions to address CS and syphilis among individuals of child-bearing capacity. The CoP is scheduled to resume in February 2024 and is open to any health department staff with interest in working to address congenital syphilis in their community. If interested and to learn more about the CS CoP, visit https:Hdocs.google.com/forms/ d/1 GzysTKIOWMvVx4-xbhtnTglCPb2ociEpbwDKZKdTIUY/ viewform?edit requested=true. If you have questions, reach out to STI Senior Program Analyst Sonia Almonte at salmonte@naccho.org. ■ PREP/4REDNESS • SUMMIT Cleveland, Ohio Public Health Dispatch • January 2024 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 'y�; Request for Comments The EPA is proposing revisions to the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for lead and copper improvements under the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The proposed rule, which will protect people from significant and irreversible health effects from exposure to lead in drinking water, is currently open for public comment through February 5. NACCHO plans to coordinate submissions from members; send us your comments at environmental health@naccho. org with the subject line, "Comments regarding Lead and Copper Rule." More information on these proposed revisions are at bit.ly/4apZmEC. Time -Sensitive Investigation of Elevated Lead Levels in Children and Adults: Cinnamon Applesauce Pouches Get updates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the nationwide status of investigation into lead contamination of cinnamon in applesauce pouches of WanaBana, Weis, and Schnucks brands by requesting to be added to the listsery at NCEHoutbreak@cdc.gov. A December radon? Radon Awareness Week is January 22-26, and there are resources to stay on top of risk awareness initiatives through the CDC (cdc.gov/radon) and the EPA (epa.gov/ radon/radon-media-resources-partners-and-stakeholders). Census Updates for Public Health Practitioners: Webinar Recording Missed the U.S. Census Bureau's and the CDCs hugely popular"Census Updates for Public Health Practitioners"webinar last year? Catch up through the recorded video at census.gov/data/academy/ webinars/2023/public-health-practitioners.html. Call for Abstracts: Retail Program Standards Symposium 2024 This is an innovative and insightful event to support retail food regulatory programs to achieve conformance with the FDA's Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards. There is no cost to attend. Abstract submissions close soon, on January 19. Learn more about the tracks at naccho.org/blog/articles/abstracts-rps- symposium-2024 and apply. 2023 FDA call was recorded and can be accessed How Climate Change Impacts Air Travel at bit.ly/47ZxUvJ. Don't see the recording? Email Have you heard? The Federal Aviation Administration ORFeedback@fda.hhs.gov. Helpful links from the confirms that weather currently causes more than CDC and the FDA on active case details are below: 75% of air traffic delays in the United States. According • https:Hbit.ly/41 oSXVW (CDC) to Climate Central's report at climatecentral.org/ • https:Hbit.ly/4aeQCAS (FDA) climate-matters/climate-change-is, disrupting -air - travel -2023, "as climate change worsens coastal flooding Test Your Nest! and extreme weather events, more flights could be Have your communities tested their homes for the grounded from weather-related delays" Find out if "number one cause of lung cancer among non-smokers," your local airport is vulnerable to coastal flooding at climatecentral.org/report/cities-coastal-flood-risk. E II �. Public Health Dispatch • January 2024 Attend a Mobilizing and using collective action for change across the whole for Action through community. Download the guide here at bit.ly/3rexOLN. Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) Training! NACCHO will offer four in-person trainings between February June 2024 on the recently updated MAPP 2.0 framework for community health improvement. The training is facilitated over two days and reviews all phases, steps, and tools of the MAPP 2.0 process, with practice activities. Visit naccho.org/mapp to learn more about MAPP and register to attend a training. New Resource: A Guide to Aligning Healthy People 2030 and MAPP 2.0 to Inform Local Community Health Improvement To help address the social determinants of health and advance health equity, NACCHO partnered with the HHS Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion to develop this guide on using Healthy People 2030 objectives and targets at the local level in community health improvement. This guide is designed to provide a structure to align MAPP and Healthy People 2030 to assist local health departments and their communities in creating prevention -strategies is Health Dispatch • January 2024 Call for Webinars NACCHO is seeking Community Health Improvement (CHI) webinars to add to its CHI Webinar - Warehouse on the Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnership (MAPP) Network. The Webinar Warehouse is a repository for webinars grounded in the MAPP foundational principles and improves practitioner knowledge, skills, and abilities to engage in high-quality CHI processes. We are looking to expand the webinars housed in this warehouse to add to the webinars by NACCHO and other organizations that provide CHI trainings and resources. If you have attended, participated in, or led a webinar related to CHI, including community health assessments (CHA), community health improvement plans (CHIP), and/or any other topics that support the implementation of these processes, please email the following to the MAPP Team at mapp@naccho.org: • Title of Webinar • Date of Webinar • Link to Webinar Host Organization Brief Description of Webinar We encourage you to reflect on the MAPP Foundational Principles when considering a webinar for submission. If you have questions about this request, please email Bianca Lawrence at blawrence@naccho.org. i 2024 National Summit Travel Awards medical NACCHO is pleased to announce reserve MRC Travel Awards to attend corps the MRC National Summit, May 22-24, in Chicago, IL. These travel awards are available from NACCHO through a cooperative agreement with the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) and the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC). These travel awards are intended for MRC unit leaders and MRC state coordinators to foster collaboration between MRC units and stakeholders, and facilitate integration of the MRC in local, statewide, or interstate deployments. In addition, this summit will allow unit leaders and MRC state coordinators to connect with colleagues, share peer-to-peer best practices from the COVID-19 pandemic, and share resources that enhance unit capabilities to prepare for, respond to, and recover from future pandemics, disasters, and emergencies. Please apply for a Travel Award at https://nacchoapplication. secure-platform.com/a no later than January 26. NACCHO Releases the 2022 Network Profile of the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Recognizing Twenty Years of Service NACCHO recently released the 2022 Network Profile of demographics, funding, training, partnerships, response activities, and capabilities. Partnerships continue to be an integral part of support for the MRC with 70% of units being affiliated with their local health departments. With this support, volunteers contributed over 1.1 million hours of service supporting local workforce and surge needs across the country. Learn more about the MRC and view the report at https:Hbit.ly/MRC-Network-Profile. Journal Supplement Highlights Lessons for Public Health Preparedness from COVID-19 NACCHO, on behalf of the Planning Committee for the 2022 Preparedness Summit, is pleased to share the publication of a special supplement to the journal Health Security. The supplement, "Reimagining U.S. Public Health Preparedness with Lessons from COVID-19;' was structured to codify the findings of listening sessions held during the 2022 Preparedness Summit and validate the experiences of the public health preparedness practice community in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.The open -access supplement features 14 papers, all of which are available online. Learn more and view the supplement at https:// www.naccho.org/blog/articles/health-security-supplement. NACCHO Releases New National Study Illustrating Need for Systematic Reinvestment in Local Public Health Preparedness NACCHO has released a report illustrating the need for systematic reinvestment in local public health preparedness. The 2022 Preparedness Profile provides the Medical Reserve Corps report, celebrating the network's one of the most comprehensive pictures of local public 20th year of service. This report provides a snapshot of the health preparedness capacity to inform priorities at MRC network in 2022, including the newest data on unit the local, state, and national levels. Learn more and view the report at www.naccho.org/PrepProfile. Public Health Dispatch • January 2024 FxoMWASHINGTON The Voice of local Health Departments: Regulatory Advocacy By Lluvia Botello, Government Affairs Associate and Victoria Van de Vate, Director of Government Affairs While this column often discusses NACCHO's efforts to positively impact the work of Congress, NACCHO also serves as the voice of local health departments to federal agencies. This fall, NACCHO has been very active by engaging with the administration and federal agencies through the public comment process, an essential component of developing effective rules and regulations. In November, NACCHO submitted comments on the Healthy People 2030 objectives, offering suggested changes and new objectives informed by public health research. NACCHO has supported Healthy People since its inception and recognizes that these objectives often drive funding decisions at the local level. Some of NACCHO's proposed changes included shifting towards language that emphasizes harm reduction and reducing stigma, the inclusion of local health departments as a critical component of the governmental public health infrastructure, and further expanding objectives related to heroin to include other illicit opioids such as fentanyl. These are only a few of NACCHO's recommendations that aim to ensure the Healthy People 2030 objectives and associated measures are reflective of the breadth of important activities, programs, and policies that they have on health across the country. Additionally, NACCHO submitted comments to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the Guidelines for the Use of Doxycycline Post -Exposure Prophylaxis (Doxy PEP) for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Prevention. NACCHO appreciated CDC's recognition that current research shows promise for the use of Doxy PEP in certain populations. NACCHO's comments center on how the proposed guidelines can most effectively reach and be received by populations who would benefit from the intervention, as well as challenges presented Public Health Dispatch • January 2024 by the current scope of the guidelines and what should be added to improve clarity. NACCHO also noted that it should be offered in the context of a comprehensive sexual health approach. In a related action, in October, NACCHO sent a letter to the White House Drug Shortage Task Force asking them to prioritize review of Bicillin -A, the only treatment for pregnant people with syphilis, that is experiencing shortages and impacting many local health departments. NACCHO believes that through the incorporation of these recommendations and those of our organizational partners, STI rates can decrease, and individuals can feel empowered to take charge of their health in a new and meaningful way. In December, NACCHO also submitted public comments to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the proposed rule to start regulating most laboratory tests. NACCHO's letter highlighted the need to ensure the proposed rule and any associated guidance does not result in unintended consequences that place undue burden on the public health system, and account for the unique needs of public health. NACCHO also responded to a request for comment from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the proposed Concept for a Framework to Assess the Risk to the Effectiveness of Human and Animal Drugs Posed by Certain Antibacterial or Antifungal Pesticides to highlight the work of our members in this space. These efforts ensure that the public health perspective— and the contributions of local health departments—are included as the federal government moves forward on a wide range of issues. You can find all NACCHO letters on our website at www.naccho.org/advocacy/activities. Oct W P H S ATC V J Q_ Resources and Information about Local Public Health UPCOMING EVENTS 2024 Preparedness Summit March 25-28,2024 Cleveland, Ohio www.PreparednessSummit.org 2024 NACCH0360 July 23-26, 2024 Detroit, Michigan http://www.naccho360.com/home Emergency Department Opioid Peer Navigators with Florida Department of Health in Broward County The United States'drug overdose epidemic is a widespread public health crisis that continues to evolve and escalate year after year. Between 2019 and 2020, a 37% increase in age-adjusted drug overdose fatalities per 100,000 individuals was observed in Florida. An increase was also witnessed at the local level, with Broward County, the second -most populous county in the state of Florida, seeing an increase of 49% in age-adjusted drug overdose deaths per 100,000 individuals between 2019 and 2020. The increase in drug overdose rates and deaths has devastatLd communities and burdened public health organizations in every state, leading to a rise in emergency medical service (EMS) responses, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations. The increase in rates has also increased transmission of infectious diseases like HIV and HCV through intravenous drug use. DOH- Broward engaged in partnerships with non -profits to expand peer recovery support services for individuals with substance use disorders in Broward County hospital EDs, jails, treatment centers, and other community sites. DOH-Broward worked with tax -assisted hospitals and one non -tax assisted hospital in establishing protocols and policies in emergency departments in order to serve as an ideal location to intervene with an individual who has just been revived from an opioid overdose, and immediately connect them with appropriate services and support. To learn more about the successes of this program, visit https:// nacchoapplication.secure-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/47/details/5923. www.naccho.org Equity Considerations for Local Health Departments on Opioid Settlement Funds Z LEGAL m L AVVLC ACTION CENTER NACCHO National Msociation of County& CiFy health •ificiais The Legal Action Center, with the support of the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO), has crafted this checklist to guide county and city health officials through decision-making and priority -setting on accessing and dispersing opioid settlement funds. Local health departments (LHDs) have varying levels of influence on how these funds are used: some LHDs are represented on opioid settlement boards and can influence how funds are used, while others do not have seats on these settlement boards but will receive funding. Regardless of their level of engagement on a settlement board, all health departments should be knowledgeable about opioid settlement funds and how to best utilize the funds to address the needs of people with substance use disorders (SUDs), prevent overdose, and advance health equity in their communities. This checklist centers the values of community engagement, oversight and accountability, and cultural humility as integral to promoting health equity in the distribution of opioid settlement funds (see the racial equity section in the resources list for a description of these values): 1. Community Engagement To use this checklist, local health departments should first conduct a needs assessment (see the needs assessment section in resources list for guidance on how to complete a needs assessment) to enhance their understanding of the various populations that live in their communities and their unique needs. The needs assessment results should identify the underserved communities in the locality. The needs assessment should meaningfully center input from people who use drugs, and communities disproportionally impacted by the overdose crisis. After conducting the needs assessment, LHDs should partner with local leaders and organizations to pinpoint the solutions that best meet the communities' needs. 2. Oversight & Accountability To ensure progress, efficacy, and a thorough understanding of how the funds are used, there must be oversight and accountability mechanisms in place and consistently adhered to. Community groups should be involved in creating metrics to assess whether the proposed use of opioid settlement funds is aligned with local priorities, and LHDs should evaluate progress on their initiatives in partnership with the community, using these metrics. 3. Cultural Humility To ensure LHDs are sensitive in responding to the needs of their communities, they should stay up to date on cultural competency training and regularly review their policies and practices on engaging and interacting with marginalized and underserved populations. Additionally, outreach and communication strategies should be culturally effective, accessible, and linguistically appropriate (as informed by federal limited English proficiency guidance[1]). They should include relevant local cultural/ethnic organizations and directly impacted people when soliciting feedback and input. The Coos and Don'ts of spending Opioid Settlement Funds The Use of Funds There is some flexibility with how states may choose to use their opioid settlement funds. However, at least 70% of funding awarded to states and localities should be spent on "opioid remediation efforts," which is defined in the settlement agreement as "Care, treatment, and other programs and expenditures (including reimbursement for past such programs or expenditures except where this Agreement restricts the use of funds solely to future Opioid Remediation) designed to (1) address the misuse and abuse of opioid products, (2) treat or mitigate opioid use or related disorders, or (3) mitigate other alleged effects of, including on those injured as a result of, the opioid epidemic." [2] Additionally, LHDs should consult their local and state governing bodies as some states or localities may have also set parameters for how funding should be spent. It is important to remember that helping people access resources to meet their health- related social needs [3], such as housing, childcare assistance, food assistance, health care access, and transportation, is crucial to assisting individuals and communities harmed by the opioid -related overdose epidemic. Meeting such needs supports and helps facilitate people's entry to and retention in substance use treatment as well as other harm reduction, health, and wellness services. Homer Funds Should Not Be Used Funds should not be used for treatment modalities that have not been scientifically proven to address opioid and other substance use disorders, such as abstinence -only based treatment programs that do not offer FDA -approved medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) [4] and/or fail to offer harm reduction services [5]. Individuals should not be restricted to a limited range of the FDA -approved medications for opioid use disorder. Likewise, funds should not be used to bolster law enforcement agencies' budgets, increase the use of child protective services, or enhance border patrol strategies as these strategies will only lead to further over -surveillance and criminalization of already marginalized communities and hinder health equity(see the overdose prevention section in the resources for strategies to prevent overdose). Prioritizing Underserved Populatiors Almost every community has a population(s) that historically has had limited access to evidence - based SUD treatment and counseling, and that has been traditionally met with punitive measures rather than a health response for substance use -related issues [6]. These inequities continue today amidst record -high rates of substance use disorder and fatal overdose. When any population experiences statistically high rates of substance use disorder and overdose, the array of service options should be informed by and address historical and continued systemic disparities and barriers. Additionally, substance use disorder treatment and support should be culturally relevant and linguistically appropriate based on the population's unique needs, mainly associated with outreach and engagement tactics. Populations that LHDs may need to pay special attention to include, but are not limited to: rural, elderly, low -literacy, and low-income communities [7]; people with limited English proficiency; geographically isolated or educationally disenfranchised people; Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) and those of diverse ethnic backgrounds and national origins; women and children; individuals with disabilities and others with accessibility and functional needs [8]; LGBTQIA+ community members; youth; unhoused individuals and families; pregnant or postpartum individuals; people living with HIV/AIDS; those with mental health conditions; underserved religious communities; people with criminal legal histories; and undocumented individuals. This list is not exhaustive, and there may be other populations in your community that you will need to prioritize. Please keep people with unique needs in mind as you complete this checklist. How To Use This Checklist This checklist is divided into five sections. The sections are designed to help LHDs use a health equity lens when strategizing and crafting initiatives for the specific SUD services communities need to prevent SUDs and overdoses. • LHDs that are represented on an opioid settlement advisory board/council should use this checklist to inform decision-making on how to prioritize the use of settlement funds. • LHDs that are not on a board should use this checklist to inform their engagement and advocacy with opioid settlement advisory boards/councils, local and state policymakers, and residents around using these funds, as well as for decision-making for the use of funds that LHDs receive. Reminder: You should complete a needs assessment to identify the specific needs of your community's priority populations BEFORE completing this checklist. Opioid Settlement Health Equity Checklist Factors to Improve Access to Services: Local health departments can advance health equity by using their opioid settlement funds to improve access to substance use disorder treatment and harm reduction services. In the row at the top of the table on the next page, you will see tactics LHDs can use to improve access to these services. In the first column, you will see a list of questions and prompts to help you think through how you can implement tactics to improve access to services in ways that center the values of community engagement, oversight and accountability, and cultural humility. Space is provided for you to list your strategies. Z N O U CO O N V 0 O LMa E O L O V U. How will your LHD identify and engage communities around this priority? Improve free or low-cost treatment options in underserved communities (i.e., access to MOUD, telehealth services, mobile treatment locations, access for uninsured individuals, buprenorphine prescriptions in hospital emergency departments) Connect underserved populations (see description above) who need harm reduction services, SLID treatment, mental health care, and/or overall health care to local services and providers Provide and/or support warm hand-off services for people who use drugs (to primary care, SUD and harm reduction services, mental health supports, housing, etc.) V CO How will impacted communities be included in evaluating or measuring successful community engagement? Who should be/already be providing oversight and accountability for these priorities (board, state, community, etc.)? How will you ensure that these priorities are culturally and linguistically appropriate, relevant, and accessible for identified communities? Removing Funding Constraints: It is essential to remove funding constraints that may hinder your LHD from providing the resources underserved populations need the most. The top row of the table below lists support that people who use drugs and those in recovery may need. In the first column, you will see a list of questions/prompts to help you think through how to center the values of community engagement, oversight/accountability, and cultural humility when identifying which constraints need to be removed. Space is provided for you to list your strategies. U) Support multi-year funding = to local organizations that ._ provide harm reduction LM L services and are }' experiencing funding restrictions or limits (i.e., O overdose prevention sites, 0 syringe service programs, Im HIV and hepatitis C C , education/prevention, etc.) MENEM � !II C I How will your LHD LL identify and engage Im communities around = this priority? O E Allocate funding to holistic recovery support services (i.e., child-care, transportation, legal aid, and housing services) Support funding for programs that allow access to all the FDA -approved MOUD medications U) .i N C O V C C LL O E How will impacted communities be included in evaluating or measuring successful community engagement? Who should be/already be providing oversight and accountability for these priorities (board, state, community, etc.)? How will you ensure that these priorities are culturally and linguistically appropriate, relevant, and accessible for identified communities? Tailoring Support for Priority Communities: The needs assessment you conducted at the beginning of this process should help you identify which populations should be prioritized. Addressing these populations' unique needs is necessary to ensure that they receive the most appropriate resources and support. In the table below, the top row lists ways that you can support populations with unique needs. Use the questions in the first column to help you think through how you can offer those services in a way that centers the values of community engagement, oversight and accountability, and cultural humility. Space is provided for you to list your strategies. How will your LHD identify and engage communities (h around this priority? 4) = How will impacted communities be included in E evaluating or measuring E successful community p engagement? V Who should be/already be LM providing oversight and .0 accountability for these a priorities (board, state, community, etc.)? How will you ensure that these priorities are culturally and linguistically appropriate, relevant, and accessible for identified communities? Implement evidence -based prevention and early intervention strategies to reduce the rates of substance use disorders, overdose, and related harms Free/low-cost treatment, harm reduction, and counseling services that are specially designed for individuals from historically marginalized populations in your community Data Collection of Services: Opioid settlement funds can be used to support the collection of relevant and informative data. It is helpful for the communities where the data collection is taking place to see the benefit of your research (see data collection section in the resources to learn more about equitable and ethical data collection). This transparency can help build trust with the populations you seek to serve. Moreover, when collecting data, you must ensure that the data collected has a clear purpose, and that communities contributing data understand how that data is being used to inform, evaluate and/or sustain projects. At the top of the chart below, you will find examples of how data collection and use to inform future policy and practice can promote health equity. The questions in the chart's first column will help you think through how to collect data to foster community engagement, oversight/accountability, and cultural humility. Use this table below to consider how your LHD can collect data to promote health equity. Space is provided for you to list your strategies. Cr W t to O = How will your LHD identify M AW and engage communities 0 around this priority? E O How will impacted 4. communities be included 0 in evaluating or measuring f.. successful community 4) engagement? 0 Who should be/already be r providing oversight and 0 accountability for these AW priorities (board, state, V community, etc.)? 4) O How will you ensure that C.� these priorities are culturally and linguistically appropriate, relevant, and accessible for identified communities? Support data collection efforts on the availability and quality of harm reduction, treatment, and counseling programs in communities while maintaining confidentiality standards Conduct a landscape review to identify and connect with harm reduction, treatment, and counseling services in historically underserved communities, for the purpose of supporting these providers Enhanced data collection relating to populations that continue to be harmed by the criminalization of drugs (`War on Drugs'), and how SUD services can best support them. f Community Education: Systemic racism led to a `War on Drugs,' which has had disparate impacts on Black and Brown communities. The failures of racist and punitive approaches to drug use and the ways in which criminalization harms communities increase risks associated with substance use. LHD staff should first be familiar with the harms that systemic racism has on health equity. Then, communities (i.e., residents, policy makers, local community leaders, nonprofits, places of worship, etc.) may benefit from education about the origins of the most recent opioid -related overdose epidemic and how opioid settlement funds can be used to support people who have been most harmed by these policies. Moreover, it is important that communities are informed about the alternatives to criminalization, instead of solely punitive responses to substance use that negatively impact individuals' health status as well as their employment, housing, and other opportunities, In the chart below, you will see that the top row lists some priorities you may want to focus on related to community education. Use this chart to assess how your community education priorities can center the values of community engagement, oversight/accountability, and cultural humility. Enhance public and professional understanding of SUDs, health insurance coverage, effectiveness of evidence -based treatment, counseling, and harm reduction services How will you ensure that these priorities are culturally and linguistically appropriate, relevant, and accessible for identified communities? How will your LHD = identify and engage O communities around this effective policies and priority? V to them ways to address existing 'O How will impacted W communities be included in evaluating or +� measuring successful = community engagement? E Who should be/already E be providing oversight O and accountability for these priorities (board, state, community, etc.)? How will you ensure that these priorities are culturally and linguistically appropriate, relevant, and accessible for identified communities? Educate LHD staff and Educate communities so they community on are knowledgeable about stigma/discrimination [9] effective policies and relating to substance use, harm interventions, and desire access reduction, and treatment, and to them ways to address existing stigmatizing/discriminatory policy and practice Resources Data Collection Why am I always being researched? Chicago Beyond. (2022, November 23). Why am I always being researched? https:Hchicagobeyond.org/researchequity/ Needs Assessment The Principles: A Quick Guide to Conducting a Needs Assessment: National Association of Counties, Opioid Solution Center, & John Hopkins School of Health. (2023, February). The Principles: A Quick Guide to Conducting a Needs Assessment. https://www.naco.org/resources/opioid-solutions/principles-quick-guide. https://www.naco.org/sites/defau It/files/documents/OSC_QuickGuide_NeedsAssessment. pdf Opioid Settlement Principles for the Use of Funds from the Opioid Litigation: Johns Hopkins School of Bloomberg Public Health. (2023). Principles for the Use of Funds from the Opioid Litigation. Retrieved from https://opioidprinciples.jhsph.edu/the-principles/ Opioid Settlement Recommendations from the Addiction Solutions Campaign: Legal Action Center. (2018). Opioid Settlement Recommendations from the Addiction Solutions Campaign. Retrieved from https://www.lac.org/resource/opioid-settlement- recommendations-from-the-addiction-solutions-campaign Overdose Prevention Evidence -Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose: Carroll, PhD, MPH, J. J., Green, PhD, MSc, T. C., & Noonan, PhD, R. K. (2022, June 9). Evidence -based strategies for preventing opioid overdose: What's working in the United States. Evidence -Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose: What's Working in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/featured-topics/evidence-based-strategies. html Stigma Around Opioid Use Disorder Presents Challenges to Treatment: Bryan, S., & Fernandez -Viva M. H. (2022, May 4). Stigma around opioid use disorder presents challenges to treatment. Stigma Around Opioid Use Disorder Presents Challenges to Treatment The Pew Charitable Trusts. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2022/05/04/panel- discussion-stigma-around-opioid-use-disorder-presents-challenges-to-treatment Racial Equity Racial Equity Toolkit, An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity: Nelson, J., & Brooks, L. (2015a, September). Racial Equity Toolkit, An Opportunity to uperationalize Equity. https://www.racialequityalliance.org/resources/racial-equity-toolkit-opportunity- operationalize-equity/. https:HracialequityalIiance.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/GARE-Racial_Equity_Tool kit. pdf Unchaining Civil Rights Through Quality Health Services and Care: Legal Action Center. (2022). Unchaining Civil Rights Through Quality Health Services and Care. Retrieved from https://www.lac.org/resource/unchaining-civil-rights-through-quality- health-services-and-care Endnotes [1] (OCR), O. for C. R. (2023, January 19). Limited English proficiency resources for Effective Communication. Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Resources for Effective Communication. https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/special- topics/hospitals-effective-communication/limited-english-proficiency/index.html [2] Distributor Settlement Agreement. (2022, March). https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/wp= conte uploads/2023/02/Final-Distributor-Settlement-Agreement-3.25.22-F�O-I-F-4hibit-C-as-of-5.27.22-F-xhibit-G-and-I-as- Qf-02.22.23. pdf [3] Hinton, E. (n.d.). A look at recent Medicaid guidance to address social determinants of health and health-related social needs. Address Social Determinants of Health and Health -Related Social Needs. https://toMy.kff�orgipolicy-watch/a-look-at recent-medicaid-guidance=to=address-social-determinants-of-health=and-health-related-social- needs/#*- @text=Health°lo2Drelated°�o20social°1o20needs°.o20(HRSN,° ° OworVja2C°�20and°1o20age). [4] Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2023, April 25). Medications for Substance Use Disorders. Retrieved from https_//www.samhsa.gov/medications-substan__e _use -disorders. [5] Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA). (2022, November 29). Harm reduction. Overdose Prevention Strategy. https://www.hhs.gov/ov_erdose-prevention/harm-reduction [6] Legal Action Center. (2022). Unchaining Civil Rights Through Quality Health Services and Care. Retrieved from bUps:/hMMU,Lac.org/re-aQUEOLUndlaijILng-civil-r g4dough-quality-health-services-and-care [7] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Underserved Group - toolkit. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. https://toolk8t.ncats.nih,ggv-//glossary/underserved-group/ [8] Glossary. Glossary I FEMA.gov. (n.d.). https://www.fema.goy/about/glossary/u#:-:text=These%Zgroupi%aQMay°ro20include%20paople,with%20disabilities%20an d o20others%20with [9] Bryan, S., & , Fernandez -Viva M. H. (2022, May 4). Stigma around opioid use disorder presents challenges to treatment. Stigma Around Opioid Use Disorder Presents Challenges to Treatment The Pew Charitable Trusts. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2022/05/04/panel-discussion-stigma-around-opic�jd_use_ disordeL-presents-challenges-to-treatment