HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD09561 BILL NO.
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN
.o
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI , AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY TO EXECUTE
A WRITTEN AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WITH BOOKER ASSOCIATES ,
INC. , FOR PREPARATION OF A TRANSIT PLANNING STUDY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH AN APPROVED URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED
.UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1964
AS AMENDED.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON,
MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Jefferson, Missouri, are hereby authorized, on behalf of the
City of Jefferson, to execute a contract between the City of
Jefferson and Booker Associates, Inc. , for preparation of a
Transit Planning Study in accordance with an approved Section
18 Planning Assistance application, Project RPT-0231-001, in
the amount of Twenty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($20,000.00) .
SECTION 2. Said agreement shall read to words as follows :
(SEE ATTACHED)
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force after its passage and approval.
Passed Approved y+ �
1.7resiOn—t of the C 2!vci Mayor
ATTEST:
� I
Ci y ClArk
1
TRANSIT PLANNING STUDY AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this day of
19 by and between the City of Jeffers City, issouri
(hereinafter called the "City") , and Booker Associat s. Inc. ,
1139 Olive St. , St. Louis, Missouri , 63101 ,
(hereinafter called the "Consultant") .
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Consultant to render
certain technical and professional services hereafter described,
and
WHEREAS, the Consultant warrants that it is competent to
perform the technical or professional services hereafter
described, and
® WHEREAS, the Consultant is desirous of rendering the
technical or professional services as hereafter described.
NOT14 THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings
herein contained, the parties agree as follows :
ARTICLE I . EMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTANT.
The City hereby agrees to engage the Consultant and the Con-
sultant hereby agrees to perform the services hereinafter
described.
ARTICLE II. SCOPE OF WORK.
The Consultant shall do, perform and carry out in a satis-
factory and proper manner as determined by the City, the SCOPE
® OF WORK indicated in the Consultant' s proposal attached and
incorporated herein as Appendix "A."
ARTICLE III. DATA TO BE FURNISHED TO CONSULTANT.
All information, data, reports, records and maps as existing,
available and necessary for the carrying out of the work shall be
furnished to the Consultant without charge by the City. The
City shall cooperate with the Consultant in every way possible
in carrying out work as set out in Appendix "A, " SCOPE OF WORK.
ARTICLE IV. PERSONNEL.
Section 1. The Consultant represents that he has , or will
secure at his own expense, all personnel required in performing
the services under this Agreement. Such personnel shall not be
employees or have any contractual relationship with the City.
Eli
W.
Section 2. All services required hereunder will be per-
formed by the Consultant or under his supervision, and all _
personnel engaged in the work shall be fully•qualified.
Section 3. None of the work or services covered by this
Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written
approval of the City.
Section 4. It is understood and agreed that the personnel
indicated in the KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL of Appendix "A" will be
assigned to the project and will be assigned responsibility as
indicated in Appendix "A."
ARTICLE V. TIME.
The services of the Consultant are to commence upon written
Notice to Proceed by the City, and shall be completed within
six months unless the time thereof is extended by mutual agree-
ment of the parties hereto evidenced by letters from each to the
other. The Consultant shall maintain the PROJECT SCHEDULE as
outlined in Appendix "A. "
ARTICLE VI . COMPENSATION.
Section 1. Compensation for the services specified in
Appendix "A, " SCOPE OF WORK, attached and incorporated by
reference hereto, for all expenses incurred by the Consultant
in overhead, travel, administrative, and indirect expenses shall
® be on the basis of allowable cost plus fixed fee for actual
cost not to exceed Twenty thousand and no/100 dollars
($ 2Q,000.00 ) dollars to the Consultant , and shall constitute
full and .complete compensation for the Consultant's services
indicated in Appendix "A. "
Section 2. The Consultant will establish cost principles
for use .in determining the allowability of individual items of
costs in accordance with Federal Procurement Regulations , Part
1-15, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with
State and Local Governments . "
Use of indirect costs as a method of apportioning costs "not
readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefited"
is authorized in Federal Procurement Regulations , Part 1-15.
-2-
The City will withhold 10 percent (10%) of the total in-
voiced amount until a final audit has been completed. Consultant
reimbursement will extend only to those costs incurred, as verified
by the final audit.
ARTICLE VII. METHOD OF PAYMENT.
The City shall pay to the Consultant not more than the amount
set out in Article VI. Payment to the Consultant will be based
on monthly submission of invoices by the Consultant. Such in-
voices shall document all Consultant' s expenses , labor and
.direct, as itemized in Table 1 referenced in Appendix "A. " •In-
voices shall include a description of work progress itemized as
in Table 2 referenced in Appendix "A. "
ARTICLE VIII. CHANGES .
The City may at any time, by written order, make changes in
the work or services to be performed under this Agreement and
within the general scope thereof. If such changes cause an in-
crease or decrease in the cost of performing the work and services
under this Agreement, or in the time for its performance, an
equitable adjustment mutually agreed upon shall be made and the
Agreement shall be modified accordingly. No work covered by a
change in Agreement will be performed until the modified Agreement
has been executed and the Consultant has received from the City
a notice to proceed with the change. Any claim for adjustment
under this article must be made in writing to the City within
thirty (30) calendar days from the date the change is ordered.
Nothing provided in the article shall excuse the Consultant from
proceeding with the prosecution of the work so changed, provided
the parties have mutually agreed to an adjustment in the costs,
if such change results in a change of costs.
ARTICLE IX. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT.
The Consultant hereby agrees and covenants that they will
hold and save harmless and indemnify the City, their officers ,
agents , servants , and employees from liability of any nature or
kind, in connection with the work to be performed hereunder,
arising out of any act or omission of the Consultant or of any
employees or agent of the Consultant or any of them, or
-3-
associated with them including any persons , firm or corporation
engaged by the Consultant to perform any work required by or in
connection with the work required by this Agreement.
ARTICLE X. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
In the event the Consultant shall for any cause fail or
refuse to carry out or to perform any of the terms or provisions
of this Agreement on the part of the Consultant required to be
carried out or performed, or if the Consultant shall fail to
complete any of the work described in this Agreement , or if in
the judgment of the City the conduct or progress of the work or
of any part thereof is such that it would be prejudicial to the
interest of the City to have the work or any part thereof con-
tinue, or if the City at any time determines that it is in the
interest of the City to terminate this Agreement or any part
thereof, the City may, by written notice to the Consultant,
terminate this Agreement or any part thereof, or terminate
performance by the Consultant of any of the work required by
this Agreement, provided the City has given the Consultant
written notice of the defect and that the Consultant has failed
to correct said defect within fifteen days after receipt of said
notice, and in any such event the City shall pay the Consultant
only so much of the compensation hereinabove set forth as , in
the judgment of the City, shall have been earned by said Con-
sultant, and the Consultant for itself, its successors , assigns
and legal representatives , does hereby agree to accept the amount
of compensation as so determined by the City as full satisfaction
and aquittance of all rights or claims for compensation hereunder
and the same shall constitute payment in full within the meaning
of this Agreement. In the event of any terminations as aforesaid
the Consultant shall deliver to the City as property of the City,
all designs , reports , drawings, studies, estimates , surveys,
computations , memoranda, and other papers, documents and other
materials either furnished by the City or prepared by, for or on
behalf of the Consultants in accordance with any provision of
this Agreement; in addition, ownership of all designs, reports,
-4-
drawings , studies , estimates , models , computations , etc. , pre-
pared within the context of this Agreement shall vest with the
City at the City' s option and the City reserves the right either
to postpone or abandon further work of the type described by
this Agreement or to cause such work to be continued or completed
in such a manner, by such person or persons and under such terms
and agreements as said City, in its discretion, may deem to be
the advantage of the City.
ARTICLE XI. NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT.
Appendix "B," pertaining to the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
is attached hereto and made a part thereof.
ARTICLE XII. NONASSIGNABILITY.
® The services to be performed under this Agreement shall
not be assigned, sublet, or transferred without the written
approval of the City.
ARTICLE XIII. MONITOR AND AUDIT.
The Consultant agrees to submit to audit at reasonable times
by the City and the authorized representative of the Missouri
Highway and Transportation Department and the FHWA. Consultant
further agrees to permit monitoring by the City, its staff, and
appropriate representatives and to comply with such reporting
procedures as may be established by the City. It is further
® agreed that financial data and supporting documents relating
to the performance under this Agreement shall be maintained and
made available to representatives. of the above for a period of
three (3) years after final payment is made under this contract.
ARTICLE XIV. TRAVEL.
The City approves travel expenses for work performed under
this Agreement and in connection with this study within the State
of Missouri. Any additional travel must have prior approval of
the City to be eligible for reimbursement.
ARTICLE XV. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS.
The Consultant agrees to comply with all Federal, State and
Local laws and ordinances applicable to the prosecution of the
work covered by this Agreement.
_5_
3t
ARTICLE XVI. CONDITION PRECEDENT.
The Agreement is subject to and conditioned upon the written
approval of the United States Department of Transportation
through its Federal Highway Administration.
ARTICLE XVII. REPORTS.
All reports shall be submitted in accordance with Appendix
"A qv
ARTICLE XVIII. PUBLICATION PROVISIONS.
Papers , interim or final reports , forms or other materials
which are a part of the work under contract will not be copy-
righted without written approval of the City.
ARTICLE XIX. GOVERNING LAW.
This Agreement shall be interpreted under and governed by
the laws of the State of Missouri.
ARTICLE XX. DISPUTES AND REMEDIES .
Except as this Agreement otherwise provides , all claims ,
counterclaims, disputes and other matters in question between
the City and the Consultant arising out of or relating to this
Agreement or the breach of it will be decided by arbitration if
the parties whereto mutually agree, or in a court of competent
jurisdiction within the State of Missouri
ARTICLE XXI. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES .
The Consultant warrants that no person or selling agency has
been employeed or retained to solicit or secure this contract
upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage,
brokerage or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees of
the Consultant for the purpose of securing business. For breach
or violation of this warranty the City shall have the right to
annul this contract without liability or at its * discretion, to
deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise
recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage,
brokerage or contingent fee.
-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have caused this Agreement
to be signed by their duly authorized officers .
:ATTESfi
By
l C ty
ekk May 6e
AT EST:
t .ranklin P. � rt P.E.
Secretary
. Fieldhamner, P.E.
President
J
'
f
V.
•N.` • .
,
'1 •
I'
a I4: '
r
!, '.
ht 'N i,t y r ` r 1f
, ` :?i. c :�^ r, ' . V. r `r;:r}vA�' t yit.,<. ,,,..,.�'t�'�1:,
, , ' Ili n a. C
y[��yyV.` t.j 'J t.. Y: 'w.,• ,' �' .`.•\• t "% t.. t•, ,�i. r!ils'. .}t t !'+''. ,^r j.;
:� '{,V, 3 ! i •h�• • t'L •.—" ' ` w '�,;,1 :I 1:;4 !�) �'f• Y.li h �'i
,• 1.4' tttt :,t + '',L, .! .a. •1:' ..y. Q 1 : t'') 1 4 „ I,'Y 'Yi t.,,�•.��(�,l4�'� ,
,? A',`f�.•f iw:{ y ,\ „S.;t',1....,a..! 1.' .S`- �. ,t ..••{•, '' ` ! r �.{• : r X Vii,:.lol l„{"rr".1,I1F,•�t +'�!
t 1'• '�'kf�.,ctrl'. 1 i, 4! I, - 't.. , rii ,,,t,7..c •l. r „A,f_ ..� it'; , y'; :��i i��"Y ✓!'
'y, t r•c'K J 4 t q ,. 1 3. •i r i.'.,t. A r' t t 9 K tr, :1,'
I'll • .. S ., , �r� .t . , ! ` r ,pit. I c J, 1 '11 ,,,. iii
�.`.,�y,ilt i,q,r•�t.p•C r •' •' t l: } .l.!..{hITM,�..1.
A , . " - I- . ; ... � , ':-!! - �_ �-,'� . ". -_ .,I..... .1. " . . ,
FF� ftVt` A k' - i
.1. .. 1 i 4 `�•
%4K,irl..'..,
•
1'
'a . .: . .. I v .�i I I � . . .. : :,. :, ,-� � ; ; . , 11 m, I
A •,t`
4y
'�:ti' `1.11 Y•,"-r A',1}r:' .'.' •l• rt I: , n.-
?i?R. {2•.'"J" : - - A .}y. rc .� c` -y'y i" ,�Fe '�t> ,Z._•:4:
•� '�-, t" t't•-
:�?!1.'. '�,',jh•.'�ir r 'rr4/ t3 - .r' r� t ,` tf. .t:_'.,, .•r.V,u..•..�.
x,lrj.at:, ! t , f
+,fd 'G'n A<,,,�+ 1 1 - b! {' � ' - r t 1 � 1 ,i t j . ii '.
S '�`', At+ =t +` +. .r::/-L J4 �:' t r „ , '.h .t ;v ,, `r4 a7 ,ty `i-" Y' i i't i\C=.,.`".t 'f
a , r. .a i�at i�.':: '�:t .t ., q ;r •r,. '¢`y r t r 4 .x.+ s i+,.Y-- *
�' ;-';�' .v, w _ ,,- -,r- tS.a k a rr ?, w..r,,.r,.a t. -i 1. .t. t1t'X,l t.!,1 .I .�.... w ..i.,t-
k 't ;";, 'y��, .J�.. .t;,1 :,+•. ..r, :.�G,` "K_'•f:"a;' 1 ..Y,.. _ .iy' .:.J.t +r.t.w,..j.tr..,.} !:, aFrt _ "y: `=}N. 'i.;,,,5 •,,-
1. i�.':ael:"?i ,!,-,t .r-',1!.i: - ,>L t - x! :r \:t. ^3' ll W.".t+�f, :4i.%'. *.: ,3�_'a` .r �t`-
'.�?f' -�,Jl+� ':'C'J.) ,.1:. ..1: �! �?.......' :'T r,:J -�}� 4Jih ,"1.::M1"v. 1 • J., R
^3y,�AJ^ ..t :!k:'1�:'Y, .:4: - _i' •!,'t'Y!.'• �.i`V y� n:.:: ':c ,` ,...::�y�! I. 7 FiAy, .d ,•„•,14 t...r_`.{., '.i a'F.. X'!'ia,�'Sgwyr•�;' i.a^,,`i
!ir+ ,rme1 .k. ':4+.0 �4i1 .}�,'' ;..•'. ,>,'. ,.•...:..J.:':'.ii`�_` �C. •'S-°' y'r c w.'I4 i.
�y ,. :"..}., •P,:.1,!,... -`:,!•wJ.:C: - .s�. a... -.'.�... yo: _ .'1..r, a Si�f'-k•-w
I 1. ( :�
{ ,..'- i-y tit - :ti .'4' -'t.' ,
y z ?:
4..
.tai•..„'!-„r.,..-4 .J 4'.n.
�i 'CN' 'r`. �i `rY. .J ,
V, ..\ ^'i•� :.':. •:. ':6'`': fir..
ih” :Y _ JJ- r4
G':. ..�. ?:i. .i .
�S- - �7. :c
f ,. ,rd. it°.r:,. 1.S"'•- :w.. ,. fir,
yt��
ct•. -
,r k r.'. - - ;j%L^
•r
' 4-'I
1
.,
i,' t
.Y "fN i :^.I —.f 4-
4t.' 'C'w 11�. '�, 3;tY1; .4- .,+•:c_• -}I ,!�.•f: �- :
p VI. v,E.. Y.: .,, r',.t'?,`t 11jt•: ,`r.. .t4:' <. - 4 r _ i .J• .r,
?l.. - Tt",Z C'iti;'•','� t.-.'. _ `s!., 'r A ,..-•ai'.••;''i�. q
r,.^I•, .,Y -t. .A,♦ � :`tY_„ .0, �;!,- : '�:,. �J ar`��. •,�'•:".:i-
t.: :l� . :r„';a
r i'J`e.t. Jr.Y.. •'� *P,
.: - ,:i` fit' _ .i•' .:tr { ,
ly,, tA^ 't
%i , J i.
/+. t kl. .t„
»-a _t
j] •.fir.• 1 j .1�
.atc f '�t'-..
_.! - (( •^i. "f.. .J .,... .:!'+ of
: •rj",SSC�I.. r7. ". - •1'1"'. '.7�-:41 =r 1,.1'' _Y.- ,'4�',.a _ j
1
r
'1" ,q _
tt
t' =i-
r�r
,4
y
'�r
t.•'r
?•t'V r•
11 I.,1• -� w•r, •rr,
.K
to ,3. aI.
1
i
'�. _. -1:i' .. ( .ri` . . "� ; rY ,fit:: a
4 7 1 _
:.c'� •n .fir. -li'
�,r .-` 1
S.' i i
;�.;, r y
1 r:, yti, 'r1 �.
-r:' :'._
i,
'1 .S'i''' r^ .k
�• 1
.j.. t ,,A..•r na}
J•
LA �.'�"�'� !�is
,',-�•;,+, Sp� +ti•' -�. :is
�i•: f� - ii<�- �i s� a:�
.LA a.A 1 {i . .r l .�. 'k,i
Y}' !6"•- .S' L' .f+ 41. �A 1 - t7j` .t:. `2 ,.
• -i-•" .' 't. .tom: y'•: .t .,k, ,-j:..,. r'
�_ .. '!t' t :}ry_,r. 3,Y- '`,, ^G:. �j�".. ,.i •ti, �',e',�._-j, ,� - ',-I, 4 •�..P . .v s,
,� .sr :.f•s�lt~t .^t• 't tl 'r: �a ~r t A rt. 't.:v� �� •{ , ._��, .i 4;. ',r'r:�, ,
'•^> ,.
.
r '�.
oi-
`.
? t'•
'i
r`
'r.
i J r.
'•r, t i
' 'rt•. ,r, '.�l . 1t—�" 1,Fltt •If .'41, ',S''' 't• i.-: ., i'.
�R`I a i R 4"`,i• k yw•rr;t� :i S r, .
?,' ;�S%=., '� <:T:;",,{:t C;,^y.4J ;C!Y: .;,"j c ,r: F I rt' ti KPr,.
{�_ . x•.-` PE ®F�, YV®RAC` .
���: :t�.y"•,..` .'v'`t�/+.-itt1Y't,,,,.41,..tf�'.i'?r{:�r.+`:'y.i�..::}}�tc\` i, ji'�T'� ,.11.i'r}}.' �I.�...f. •"v:
�q�t ,..r' c� .Gj', r'Y: .i't`r,.'.'.- H»,.^ /u'• 1• x\ .} '�
+Z I. .f:+ 'L:i'= :-i••..1,:t�.t,� 'y• .t.'.'..'\••1•rr-y, ,,t,•.'' `` ..4♦
.t�, :}'• •4 r--' .�lr..li'- Mr...y'•. '.4'•t f,i��Iti):i)'' n^v, .tl' %.j�, :C'Y• '�.. ••3> r'. . .�r•
i, '14 '',. t•i-,•- Y' .[ 't:,t^)T.,�cr.. r { i _,�,C{a,?' - u.- It i"Ij.: .{ •* b •'' t: ` ,r.
-� ,r. 't 4•..• '!- 1,Yt�.r;r 'i .T. .^,.,� ,';. 'S.' ,!-1.�li .t',•: .i '� 9� `•{' ,y' .-1,'J'.�•,,. .Y;
.ti + ,;t'"Pt.d �. , t,.^ i.•-,, :y'.,,. i, ,. _.I '.J A 1�� 4:... � -rn,9. ,, t`;s } st:{
.b.1` "4 ",:✓r? .,' t d' 4Y.e`tx: r., }t `f r' _ _ i y. . f=' •. .- ±`i ;:,r ,, .�.f, I.7,t,,.
.•t ,.5, t• %�`y •i• L;f.4--''t.+ '.Y., it t ,1 �.- } .1 .e ,.t" r.`:1 l` ',':t. �.-_. ':�,t,. 1,'�e }t+•t.I.
..p ...'i'A.t ct :e`~ J '�`. "r.:: ji9:,1-;� `� i-j;: ;.o_.' ::I t.i ..• ...:�,, .r } ,� J�1 t.!A• �,«!�}
_ ',,, t }ZS.,ryt:• -'r•;,��`•-4, '" .c' it"rs -1:1,,,*.<kt 2.*, 1 •.}, y s r r x ,.'yi:�n{.1�•. - yl,',�;.�, f •i' i'• ��, ,,i• I S=
a •d .A :^'• r 4'r 1- w'�IY,r. a..r�ii..•,r a t �,��{T rt,•s i.,.r "i. ,�` a c a � .,.1,., r }- r+•
11 ti >Y„4: •,t �'t,• trt t"i, r,y , ..^L 7 Z t tt '• �' + - .� i ,_-iC a.. �':.' : all ?: '," aN` , ,ri t��
'•" ,�?+. .y: l�' .\.1. ✓:i�^•)7, 4 r-.:,A` v '�3� 'a.r„F n��:;� •r y�:�:},:i�� t'•"�1 ,t',f3f t',� �• * t ,+�.j',i' •^t"��y.f .�. . ,`9�•:.,."i.�' ( ..4'� tlt.
+ li;rf „� .• `'L :" °i ( ^`- �lir ':;'.r yy: ! axr�3. F''y .S d,r _ 4c�.
I1 {Y�
)) t, ,"•° f 1r-' • rJ Yj, V Kr}�.5•-' .-t.. r hv'.. t.r•S!, t ,.,jt.• i` 1.,.;.k",j."-
, `1 t: �{.. . ':�:/ .w- ., lit.! - f �-.I [r,tn>tk! i==rt�J..,,.r'{ :�/tf j. ..�i vC:` •} ]x Kf�•[ !4, .4'
X.r. ,'` 1 '' ;1�.�=`.+.�J t � '} •�;,`�?•.+ ..'i'cyti;r' .:1'T� zt:;r%.,'., ..' :;C;a4 i. .. }7,t� .. .Yi: <•'1 c;) �`r,•{4 ''+�• y c-tir ,V, 1.
Ii,, cr i s, 11 1.•. S�"el.l,d1t tS*'1'...rr.: g p:,. t�Y• +,r' y�' i p?taw: , ..y. t �'
! 'a r�1, �! t.L It` ti. ? dy,x.; ,tyc, 5r {`.
+ •Z^ t .4�'t.r �' �1 .K'. t'• .f sa 1• 3.", xY rr�', ,3•.} r,,.:• J ,! t.,, ti �
tY .��N.a[Y.,•G^ ;i. ;r•r t:y:.�.�;• •,.�e..t• !t•...5'.., .' r.'` t} ; tt,,��...;its';,-i! p"•'�t'.{t 1,,r:'•�;•'�l. �t+',�.'� ..,:Jl'• .Ny' ':s',f,• re,,n '�-4,
is ' �'' M. ry� e •r.Yt ^L: rti? �` S l.t QI•. ar+ JL• .O ,
;� I ^!'�{' ;� �� : ,,.;..;; t' ;t7•.'A. i t Ir e�'St !. tJ .,}� .A,Gti 1i ,'.-4'..', , :r1y .;. A�•J [:
'•f't "' „• .,:J(i ' r�.•i 4.4 '•rr.,yf' "�'^'i, ,9' � 'A{ r �s Y'n,..Z�t .t..%v t#' �� � yT r,%t�� ,`,, Z !" tt I'll w
w rww ww wrw w-r
R a��d1/tiOV►■
Engineers Architects Planners
SCOPE OF WORK
As noted in the Request for Proposal (RFP), this project is divided into
three (3) parts: Site Feasibility Study, a 504 Transition Plan, and an
Impact Study of the Truman Building on the Transit System. Consequently,
this section of the proposal will also be divided into the same three
areas for the purpose of detailing Booker's Work Program. ;
PHASE I - GARAGE SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY
The purpose of this study is to select a site for the proposed new Central
Maintenance/Bus Garage, determine the environmental and economic impacts,
and provide the approximate size and special requirements of both the City
vehicle maintenance and the bus maintenance portions of the building. In
order to complete this Study, the following tasks must be completed.
Task I.I - Collection of Maintenance Requirements
Through discussion with Department of Public Work (DPW) personnel and a
thorough 'inspection and evaluation of the existing garage, the following
information will be collected relative to the maintenance requirements of
both City vehicles and buses:
• Condition of existing garage and building systems
• ' Square footage needed for storage
• Type of equipment and parts usually stored
• Fuel requirements
• Preference for pits or hoists
• Extent of major repairs to be completed at the Garage
• Any special and/or unique requirements
e • Amount and type of general repairs to be done on site
• Number and type vehicles to be stored on site
• Number of employees on site by shift times
1
rK... - - _— `Mi1i..M-l.s..w ..'!.:;j•••... ... .,... ..._.,. ...�.,..._. ._.M.rw.w.wl.-..w..i.viL.v i.r.w1.
t�7%Vloi%two
Engnems ArChitects Mannms
Task I.2 - Determine Garage Site Requirements
Based on the results of Task I.1, the site requirements for a new Garage
will be determined. This determination will include such items as the
following:
• Estimated number of maintenance bays
s Square footage of each bay
• Square footage for parts storage
• Amount of internal vs. external bus and vehicle storage
• Internal layout and operation
• Possible external configuration of building
• External circulation and parking requirements
• Overall site square footage required
Task I.3 - Assembly of Potential Sites Data
Working in conjunction with the City in general and the DPW in particular,
and drawing on the results of Task I.2, Booker will identify up to five
(5) possible sites that could be used for the new Garage. The following
sub-tasks present the type of data that will be collected for each site.
Sub-Task 1.3.1 - Collection of Physical Data:
For each of the potential sites identified in Sub-Task I .1 . 1, the
following physical data will 'be obtained, but not limited to:
• Square footage or acreage of site
• Geographic location
• Site configuration
• Utility availability and capacities
• Topography
• Soils
® • Drainage
• Air and-Water Quality
• Noise
2
�+7wv�av■
Engineers Architects Planners
Sub-Task I.3.2 - Collection of Transportation Data:
The following transportation data will be collected for each site:
• Street system characteristics and capacities
• Proximity to transit routes
• Proximity to workers employed at the Garage
• Accessibility to major street system for supply and emergency
vehicles
Sub-Task I.3.3 - Collection of Institutional Data:
The following institutional data will be collected for each site:
o Land use on the sites and in the surrounding area
• Zoning
• Socio-economic data of surrounding area
v Number of parcels
o Property ownership
• Approximate value of property
The data collected above will be reviewed and any deficiencies noted.
Additional data will be collected to correct the noted deficiencies. This
additional data will be collected in the same categories as noted above
and will be done by Booker. ,
Task I.4 - Data Analysis and Site Evaluation
Utilizing the results of Task I.1-1.3, the potential sites will be
evaluated and ranked according to the various data categories, and will
evaluate one potential site against another. This evaluation could be
performed in the form of an Evaluation Matrix as shown in Figure 1. The
exact criteria and their importance will be determined by the DPW and
e other City staff involved with the project . The results of this
evaluation will be a "preferred site" which best fits the estabished
criteria. .
3
Engineers Architects Flamers
i
FIGURE 1
SAMPLE EVALUATION MATRIX
GARAGE SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY
,JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI +,
POTENTIAL GARAGE SITE i
EVALUATION CRITERIA
A B C D E
1. Cost of Property 1 3 4 5 2
2. Proximity to Transit Route 2 1 3 4 5
® 3. Soils Suitability 4 5 2 3 1
4. Utilities Available 1 3 2 4 5
a. Gas +'
b. Electric
c. Telephone
d. Water
e. Sewer
5. Property Size 3 4 5 2 1
6. Accessibility to Streets 1 2 4 3 5
Other Criteria
Average Ranking 1 4 2 5 3
Engneers Architects Planners
Task I.5 - Report Preparation
Upon completion of the previous two tasks, the methodology and results of
Phase I will be documented in a report. This report will be of sufficient
detail so that the City can proceed with additional grant applications for
the design and construction portion of the overall Garage program. This
report will be included as a portion of the overall project once the other
two Phases are completed. However, it will be complete in itself and will
be able to be used for any additional grant application. :
PHASE II - TRANSITION PLAN, SECTION 504 REQUIREMENTS
In the May 31, 1979 Federal Register, guidelines were published for the
implementation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Section
504 provided that "no otherwise qualified handicapped individual
shall , solely by reason of his handicap, be excluded from the !
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial
assistance .
As the rule is applied to transportation and transit operations in
specific, it stated that all recipients of financial assistance from the
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) must make their existing and
future facilities and programs accessible to all disabled individuals, and
must participate in the planning and documenting of this accessibility
through a device called the "Transition Plan" . Furthermore, recipients
are prohibited from discriminating against handicapped persons in their
employment practices and are required to amke "reasonable accommodations"
to otherwise qualified handicapped employees.
Program accessibility is achieved when a transportation system, viewed in
its entirety, is accessible to all handicapped persons. USDOT has mandated
that at least 50% of the peak-hour service must be accessible by July 1,
1982; revenue vehicles, services offered, fixed facilities, and policies
4
�.�►�►women■
Engineers ArchdedS Planners
and practices are specified as elements to be considered in achieving this
AOL
level of accessibility. If extraordinarily expensive structural changes
and/or replacement of vehicles and facilities are necessary to achieve
this level, the deadline may be extended to July 1, 1989; this extension
is allowed only with the provision that an accessible transportation
system is supplied in the interim period for handicapped persons who could
have otherwise used the system if it had been made accessible. Each
recipient is required to document how program accessibility will be
achieved (Transition Plan) and submit this as a written assurance that the
program will be conducted and f ac i i t i es will be operated in compliance
with this ruling as a condition to approval or extension of Federal
financial assistance.
Because the Jefferson City Transit System (Jefftrans) receives a portion
of its financial assistance from the Federal government it has been
required to prepare a Transition Plan that addresses the Federal mandate.
Booker, in order to prepare a Transition Plan that is viable and
acceptable to both Jefftrans and the Federal agencies, proposes the
following scope of work:
Task II.1 - Establishment of a Citizens Advisory Committee for Transition
Planning._.
An advisory committee will be formed, composed of representatives from the
City, social service agencies , transit providers, and others as
appropriate. It would serve in an advisory capacity only and provide the
necessary input into the process of developing the Transition Plan.
Task 11.2 - Evaluate the Current Transit Program and Determine the
Existing Level of Accessibility
All existing public transit vehicles, their services, fixed facilities and
the policies and practices of the providers will be examined and the areas
5
iit�?v v tea..i
Engineers Architects Planners
® that do not meet current accessibility standards noted. These will be
used in Task II.3, the development of the Transition Plan.
Task II.3 - Development of the Transition Plan
Those areas that do not meet accessibility standards will be examined in
detail. Options for meeting the 50 percent accessibility requirement will
be developed. The establishment of interim accessible transit service
will be examined as one of the options. As other options are indentified,
they will be examined in detail for levels of service, funding sources,
operating costs, fares, and priority of ridership.
Task II.4 - Development of a Detailed Program for Implementation of the
Transition Plan
As an integral part of the Transition Plan, both short and long range
implementation schedules will be developed. These schedules will list the
® cost impacts associated with Jefftrans Capital Improvement Program, assign
responsibilities, and provide the coordination necessary to improve the
effectiveness of the transit service.
Task II.5 - Review, Revision, and Endorsements of the Transition Plan
The draft of the Transition Plan will be submitted to the City' s Advisory
Committee, appropriate social services agencies, and transit providers .
Their comments will be incorporated into the document and endorsements of
the Plan by various agencies obtained.
Task II.6 - Public Review and Hearing on the Transition Plan
After the draft has been reviewed by the Citizen Advisory Committee and
any comments incorporated, it will be made available for public inspection
• and a public hearing held. Comments obtained at the hearing will be
incorporated into the document and the Plan finalized.
6 '
m
Engineers Architects Planners r
I
I
PHASE III - TRANSIT SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PLAN
This Phase of the project will determine the impact the new Truman State
Office Building on Jefftrans and to prepare a comprehensive Transit
Improvement Program (TIP) which will also examine all operational ,
management, and capital needs of Jefftrans.
Task III.1 - Assembly of Existing Data i
The objective of this task is to assemble existing material relevant to i
past and present public transportation operations in the City, present and
future regional public transportation needs, and future transit service
development . This material will provide a partial basis for the .
evaluation of transit needs and the subsequent analyses related to
alternative means of satisfying these needs . The following sub-tasks
comprise Task III.1 i
Sub-Task III.1.1 - Assembly of Public Transportation Service
Information:
The objective of this sub-task information concerning all existing public
transportation serving the Jefferson City area will be gathered indicating
route or service descriptions, hours of service, frequency of service, and I
1 :
fares. In addition to regular fixed route transit services operated by J
Jefftrans, any special services for the elderly and handicapped provided
by local agencies or volunteer groups will be inventoried, as well as the
characteristics of public school bus services operated within the area.
i
Sub-Task III.1.2 - Inventory of Service Operating Data
This sub-task will consist of an inventory of available data relating to
• the vehicles and equipment owned by the existing transit operators in the
City. Also included will be historical ridership data by route or
service, maintenance records and practices, franchise and certificate
information, management structure, and labor rates and conditions.
7 �
G�m%'v`wi►vi
Engineers Architects Planners
Sub-Task III.1.3 - Assembly of Financial Data
This sub-task will consist of the assembly of revenue and expense data.
Included will be financial statements, and revenue and expense records
broken down into sufficient detail to support projections required in this
i
study.
1
Sub-Task III.1.4 - Assembly of Planning Data
This sub-task will consist of the collection of existing and forecast data {
on travel patterns, land use, and characteristics of the area and its
residents. These characteristics will include population, dwelling units
automobile ownership, family income and employment location, especially as
it will be after the Truman Building is open. Census data for 1980 will
i
be utilized to the maximum extent possible. Additionally, pertinent
i
information from the Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Agency will be
analyzed.
Sub-Task III.1.5 - Assembly of Plan and Program Information
This sub-task will consist of assembly of information on local, state, and
Federal programs which may affect mass transportation in the study area. `
This will include highway, central business district, urban renewal ,
housing, model cities, and other development plans and projects. '
Task III.2 - Collection of New Data
The objective of this task is to develop information needed to supplement i
�i
existing data for the identification of public transportation needs, the t
;f
evaluation. of existing services, and the analysis of new service
alternatives. A series of surveys and interviews is proposed which Booker
has found to be effective in similar studies. This series is described by
the following sub-tasks.
i
it
8
M.M=-^
n�r.�,r fs tttra�■
Engineers Architects Planners
Sub-Task III.2.1 - Survey of Present Public Transportation Users:
This sub-task will include an on-board transit rider survey and an on-off
count survey conducted on the -regular bus routes operated by Jefftrans.
Rider information will be collected by a card survey on every bus run in
order to represent a "typical" weekday of operation. The survey will
identify why people use the bus, and other information such as age, sex,
income, trip purpose, trip origin, and trip destination. A one-day on-off f
count survey will be conducted on all regular routes. Survey workers will
ride each trip, recording the number of riders getting on and off along
the routes. This information will then be utilized to identify peak load
points which is important for route analysis . The survey will be
conducted by City personnel with supervision by Booker.
Sub-Task III.2.2 - Mail-Out Attitudinal Survey:
To obtain data describing the attitudes toward public transportation of
AOL
users and non-users, a postal return survey will be performed in this
sub-task. Selected target neighborhoods in Jefferson City will be
surveyed to determine such things as the extent of present transit usage, it
perceived need for transit, perceived evaluation of present service, and
improvement priorities . This survey will also be conducted by City f '
personnel with Booker's supervision.
Sub-Task III.2.3 - Interviews With Potential Transit Users:
This sub-task will consist of interviews by Booker and local staff with
groups such as the elderly, the handicapped, and other appropriate
community groups undertaken to determine more specifically their unique l
i.
needs for transit service. These contacts will be valuable in designing a
transit system that is responsive to community needs and in opening
channels of communication with these groups that can later be used to
convey information about new or improved services that would encourage
public usage and acceptance of Jefftrans.
;f
'I!
9
I!
i
arrsr.�►rrs►�ae,.■
Engneers Architects Planners
Sub-Task III.2.4 - Interviews with Agency Representatives:
This sub-task will consist of interviews with staff representatives of
public and private agencies concerned with health, welfare, educational ,
and employment services, especially those which presently operate 1
transportation services . These interviews will identify specific and
potential needs for regular and specially designed public transportation
services.
Sub-Task III.2.5 - Interviews with Representative Employers:
This sub-task will consist of interviews with representatives of a l
selected group of employers in the City, conducted to determine the
transportation patterns of their employees and work trip public
transportation needs. The sample of employers to be interviewed will be '
i�
selected so as to insure a representative geographic coverage of
employment in the City. Of specific interest will be major residential
concentrations of employees, current modes of travel used by employees, ;
employee shift change times, plans for employee parking lot construction,
and the resulting shift of employees to the new Truman Building.
Sub-Task III.2.6 - Interviews with Representative Business Groups: `
This sub-task will consist of interviews with leading merchants, Chamber
of Commerce, the news media, the utilities, and various business groups
undertaken to determine general and specific attitudes toward and
perception of needs for transit service. The amount of potential support j
for transit development from these groups will be an important factor in
selecting a future level of transit service in Jefferson City. ;
Task III.3 - Analysis and Evaluation of Public Transportation Needs and i
Service Alternatives
• 4
This task involves the analysis of new and existing data collected in ,
previous tasks to assess public transportation needs, followed by the i !
identification and evaluation of transit service alternatives. '' }}
1t
I �I
i;
10
Imams�/►�%i�'�.v�
Engineers Archilecls Planners
Sub-Task III.3.1 - Analysis of Needs vs. Existing Services:
Using the data and information assembled in Tasks III .1 and III .2, this
sub-task will analyze the level of service currently provided by public
transportation services in Jefferson City and compare this with present
and future transportation demands and needs . The distinction between
"demands" and "needs" may require considerable deliveration with
substantial local policy input. From the comparison of present service
with transportation needs, probable public transportation deficiencies
over time will be developed. These deficiencies will focus not only on
the needs of specific user groups, such as commuters, the elderly, the
handicapped, the poor, and the young, but also on the special impacts
caused by the Truman Building.
Sub-Task III.3.2 - Identification of Service Objectives:
Based on the results of the previous sub-task, Booker, local staff, and
the Citizen's Advisory Committee will jointly develop a set of objectives
for public transportation in Jefferson City. Some of these will be broad
in scope and not associated with single improvements or modifications in
public transportation service; others will be more specific and related to
particular improvements or actions, ;
Sub-Task III.3.3 - Analysis and Evaluation of Service Alternatives:
In this sub-task alternative systems of transit routes and services will
be identified jointly by Booker, local staff, and the Citizen' s Advisory
Committee, which could be implemented in a 0-5 year time frame. Services
will be defined which potentially will satisfy the immediate public
transportation needs of commuters, the elderly, the handicapped, low
income groups, and others . These services will rely on technology }
presently available in the area or technology which could be brought in
i
within the 0-5 year time frame -- conventional transit vehicles, vans,
school buses, and taxis. Although the initial thrust of this task will be
r
on the analysis of regular, fixed-route services, demand-responsive
1
f .
t��ir"WWILMW■
Engineers Architects Planners
services will be examined for possible application in small areas or for
the elderly and handicapped. Alternatives will not be limited solely to
vehicle routings and will include such service elements as equipment and
fare policies. In addition, the "null " alternative -- no new public
transportation services -- will be considered. The purpose of reflecting
on the "null" alternative is twofold. First, it serves as a baseline for
gauging the impacts of other service alternatives . Second, and most
important, it is a legitimate alternative in its own right and may merit
considerable attention, depending on the particular needs of Jefferson
City and the values of its residents.
Service alternatives will be evaluated by forecasting their
transportation, economic, and social impacts over a five-year period. I
Ridership, revenues, and costs (capital and operating) will be estimated 1
for each service alternative. The forecast impacts of the service
alternatives will be compared with the objectives identified in Sub-Task
III.3.2. In this way, effectiveness of individual service alternatives
can be measured to assist the Citizen's Advisory Committee in selecting
the service components of the Transit Improvement Program.
Task III.4 - Analysis of Organization and Management Structure
In this task an analysis will be conducted of the present organization and
management structure of the Jefftrans. The focus of this task would be
decided upon discussion will Jefferson City, but specific areas of concern
might include:
• Management personnel requirements and functions.
• Suitability of existing organizational structure with respect to i
transit funding.
;f
• Revenue and cost accounting procedures.
• Desirability of integrated public transit and school bus
operations.
. I
LL i
1W*Air NVOW 0
Engineers Architects Planners
9 Need for continuous data collection requirements to assist system
management. I
is Guidelines for evaluating new or trial transit services.
e Mechanisms for citizen participation in system management.
Task III.5 - Detailing a Recommended Transit Improvement Program
After completion of Tasks III.3 and III.4, sufficient information should
be available for -the Citizen ' s Advisory Committee or other local
decisionmakers to select the service components of the recommended Transit '
Improvement Program and the most appropriate institutional arrangement .
After these selections are made, the Booker will proceed to detail a
Comprehensive Transit Improvement Program for the Jefferson City. The
following sub-tasks present an outline of the major elements of the
Transit Improvement Plan.
® Sub-Task III.5.1 - Preparation of a Service Improvement Program:
This task will consist of detailing recommended basic transit services and
j
special services, including route descriptions , hours of service,
frequency of service, and fare levels. Procedures for coordination of all
transit services in the area will be identified. Particular attention
will be given to non-capital intensive means of improving service .
Priorities will be identified, and an implementation schedule prepared.
Sub-Task III.5.2 - Preparation of a Capital Improvement Program:
This will consist of identification of transit vehicle requirements, by
type, and all additional capital improvements, including bus shelters, bus
stop signs and benches, and communication equipment. Priorities will be
identified and an implementation schedule prepared. Both the capital and
® service improvement programs will reflect any appropriate application of
the results of UMTA RUD Programs.
i3
Engineers Architects Planners
Sub-Task III.5.3 - Preparation of Five-Year Projections of Ridership,
Revenues, and Costs:
This sub-task will consist of an estimate of all operating and capital
improvement costs, as well as ridership and revenues, for a five-year
period.
Sub-Task III.5.4 - Description of Organizational and Management Forms for
Transit Operations:
This sub-task will consist of describing the recommended organizational
and management forms for transit operations in the study area.
Sub-Task III.5.5 - Preparation of a Five-Year Financial Plan:
In this sub-task a five-year financial plan will be developed for public
transportation services in the area. Allocations of capital and operating
costs within the area will be specified, and anticipated state and Federal
funding will be noted.
Sub-Task III.5.6 - Development of Guidelines for a Transit Information and
Marketing Program:
This will consist of the development of guidelines for a program to foster
knowledge of, and promote use of, local transit services. Included will
be identification o.f needs with respect to maps , schedules, and
recognition features of vehicles, bus stops, and drivers, as well as use
of telephone and the news media for communication.
Sub-Task III.5.7 - Preparation of a Plan for Maintenance of the Transit
Development Program:
This will consist of identification of procedures to be followed for a
. periodic update of all components of the Transit Improvement Program.
Included will be identification of procedures for regular monitoring of
transit service in order to assure quality service to riders and maximum
attractiveness to potential users.
14
Engineers Architects Planners
PREPARATION OF FINAL REPORT
In this task a report will be prepared presenting the results of the
entire study, and incorporating the Transit Improvement Program.
Initially, a draft final report will be submitted to the City (3 copies) . .
After local, state and Federal review of the draft, the report will be
modified as necessary and resubmitted in final form (50 copies) .
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION PROGRAM
As mentioned in Phase II, a citizen participation and information program
is suggested for inclusion in the study. This program will make an effort
to obtain the active involvement of citizens in the planning process .
Without substantial dissemination of information concerning the project,
i
® however, meaningful citizen participation will not be possible. i
To be successful , the program must make effective use of news media, civic
and citizen groups, and business organizations. The community interviews '
proposed for Task III.2 could serve a dual purpose by not only collecting
information on transportation needs, but also serving as a mechanism for
citizen involvement. In Task III.3, it may be valuable to return to the
community groups interviewed for informal discussions to assist in the =$
evaluation of alternatives.
'+
.r,
'=a
The project information and participation program should primarily be the
responsibiity of local staff. Their familiarity with the Jefferson City I
area, its residents, and local issues dictates this. However, Booker
would assist in developing the overall program and would participate at li
• public meetings and workshop sessions as necessary. `
i
t w.
,t
mss
zi:t
fk..
15
at�r• I s � . � 1 .. F t «� kl j � :4R Y ''
'IZ 4. {•' ,t f� } t S. a'r•r Sw + y t , �� .J \ � �: 1y� .'*1� ti,..
yl L
• �_ � ' ' I r 'yam, �`• ,t
� rn �.Sr: .t, . r f tj, - .r•� :Cji r'.1\ 't:y:1a ,•.4�4.,{ t'11y`,at« 1, .f:;j«eL�.
{�,.�• t .t ,," _+ 't 1. S �' .a t� b it r•: r E' \ �Y y 1'tJ N. y
- •r.a 1'14 +rl "�'•. ?
'.;'•; .1 J , • S.` r .} I� i• j k 1 �•' i 1" :a =�+i(rxY�.fl•ra �. �'�.al"�.
ri y t ke.',I c It
• �1... t Y ,1 •t r.t. ..t, .1 3.
. I .. it w � y 1 , .t Y•• w. l�
�, \ t /r \ _ - ti [ Y C + t _ ^h J ,`• 'LJ•a \ 4�y {p« ;.k« }�'.�"Y..•1'lr
+ ''� I •s1 J !�}
74 t
1 1 >•: .t
t �, ,'I 1 y:, t 'i•1' Il. 'rf ,'7.'tr it .l r 4•',J'.
,. :�• 1 .}r I. '.,- 9 f- a� - •t` `�1, 'fG ti r ^;;•Y�'. "7:6.%,i rr'f.
PROJECT SCHED ULE 'and COST
C' � j.�'t.'J• I�Yr, 1 .S i, .t' ., .{ r •�;t .Y I , S• 17\ « :�; �i Z r'k Z.�•.4,{�/y.,k
-'j jet;"Idt?i:,.•t•iy 4f �. +,f ,t I.�a\, .�! �• ;y!� « { I '1,'�i't'•"fir i.t;f••.��••+yy}�},�;'4''' 7
'a:,l .17.•YJ.�. _ y � r ,,1: ,. � .^.h -/.' ;r;f = '7;> «,\ �E '' ix-«'.;i?��;;e r•H1-•�;�,��:
ttt�as v m tr�.�r is
Engineers Architects Planws
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST
SCHEDULE
In order to complete the three-phase scope of work presented in the
previous section , a total project duration of six (6) months is
anticipated. This assumes that local and Federal review of the draft
report can be completed in less than one month.
Submission of the Phase I report is scheduled for February 20, 1980,
assuming a project start of January 12, 1980. The Phase II and III effort
requiring four (4) additional months. At the end-of that five (5) month
period, the draft final report will be submitted for review. This
five-month time frame for completion of the draft has been found to be a
® "comfortable" period in which. to conduct a project of this type, allowing
sufficient time. for local response to work at critical points during the
course of the study.
COST
The estimated budget to perform the professional services described in the
previous section is summarized in Table 1. Table 2 provides a task-by-
task cost breakdown.
Included in the budget are all costs necessary to perform the services
.4
including three (3) copies of a draft report for review. After necessary
review and revision, a total of fifty (50) copies of the final report
would be submitted.
is
r
r
b,.
16
*i'
t
c ' LL
o
c
0
o a
IL
M
M N
t
c
O
• � r .J
!il
W
cm
F- O
QC Z E as
O U o 0 0 Cd
0 `
d Z w Z 0 I-
0O a
W c ` G• c i
�'- .. t. O
CC N �, a n. a °� m ac
V� Z W Y 0 �,� c E a
O e= LL V1 0 a « m c a 0 ; Z
u. d E c v = 0 E o O ?
O H X000 Ev c c oa
E E < E
cc m p V c QF
ca
v c E t
IL
m Q o a, o o c �- 0 cc
2.O cry 0 a c c � ca :: Ca c � oc z
o o a s =° 0 0 o O
IL o 0 « N
a m k Cd Ca
zc
a " i C C - 0 a7 = O > C M m J Z
ca 0 `etf ~ c c E o Z W b. c E z 0 t
o n o n V o a`o a m m W o r- Q a o ti
c c a. o a z 0 �" E ¢ o m c 0 00 m u. a
CL CL a:E E < 0 0 3 v E N ; � .ot O V
:c 0 .0 �. � �. — Z i-
:: a oa 5. 21. c °' 0 oao40 0 CC '
0 o ao ao o = ao wa
0n •cn cc wimawa.
LU LU LiJ cc Z
f/1 + N 0) V' to Co •- N M V' to m CO N to •t w < W
Q r r r r r Q = • • w r r • • • • ui N
T T�• � r
i dr cc r
a a is a v
Engineers Architects Planners
TABLE 1
PROJECT COST ESTIMAT+,°
TRANSIT PLANNING STUD:`
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI
Daily
Labor Category Days Rate* Cost
Principal-In-Charge 12 $320 640
Senior Professional 35 210 7,350
Professional 12 145 10740.
Technician 15 115 1,725
r
TOTAL LABOR $11,455
Direct Expenses
Travel and Subsistance $ 2,100
Other Direct Costs
TOTAL LABOR AND DIRECT COST $14,363
s
Profit $ 1,437
Subcontractor $ 40200
TOTAL CONTRACT COST $20,000
*Includes Direct Labor Costs, Payroll Burden of 29%0 and Overhead
Rate of 67X.
o
IIr►YY1Alo■
Engineers Archtects Planners
TABLE 2
LABOR COST ESTIMATES BY PHASE
TRANSIT PLANNING STUDY
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI
Labor Cost
PHASE I - Garage Site Feasibility Study $ 5,100*
PHASE II - Transition Plan 2,555
PHASE III - Transit System Impact Study and Transit
Improvement Plan 8,000'
TOTAL LABOR COST $15,655
® Direct Expenses
Travel and Subsistance 2,100
Other Direct Costs 808 i
TOTAL DIRECT COST $ 2,908
Profit $ 1,431
TOTAL CONTRACT COST $20,000
*Includes Subcontractor costs of $4,200. =
t.
,1
t
5
S:
#r.
•4 .
�L �
f y _ —
'V .
• , ..'.y!
f r i4 .••
,,fir �, 'it' .+ - .. t t' f , Y-,.. laf y; .:y 1 if.'.4.
1r tt:: ' ,f, ,r• 1 F. 1' D r7•" � � t- , r f,i' 11'
(� Ya• .�.+lr-j. f,,7'• "•' `._ .i' 1 . F t tr.,' 2 'y`4= j� ,t t
11 ��'thYRi°E�"o t r f. � t, ` 4 t r i,1.;, , •, '' • :' ;f t` 1 t t}.'`t rat, ..
r � ' - r r, r
: L ; ,. .r -11
. Y r4 X +s'ii re 's' t c .. �. "r , r •n S .t t ,'rt,' I
a t'I. t .. 4_ -� i y . ct, , r c d 1.
'{ `r. d•�j� .{i' d .r.r' t t, l t 1, t j f..Y. t'. a =x,yz i�t t`�I";fit y tl.�
d d 4. .r >�� � I c •t
j
K04
t 4. 5 �Y ,. { ' n 1 r J.i.�,'r ,hj't 7" {,T tf.. dt�*-
•` �. •. t r: 1 t ? .` �.S.i jY•r 1 '"�tt Z'l r w..�4 d
:S:t r�.:.•�^ a.•. i. 4 r t . .i r.� S {. +'' k..,• v'•4�'.. C I•� �p t.r 't
J• ^r a•. i? f '�! �;.,tx "fit �3 +�.., p �i .
�. .},."� •r 'k• •t ,it• ;r•;l a/ - t r t r r "r '„ '. k ,-qi .,�i.Nt; ,y ~ti:i...l
Al� tit A' l,j; .r� , 1 >': e `t r r.0 M. .'e aril '`� d.�1r
'..'i'xyt•4.1``-;1: 1. ' '.,: t r' '�a '� t _ ';,�;':i� I �d. {F;r k', It5:.:.;I 'i
Y f A v r- tl �. �. ::'';F..F;'�ftt r°YK,' .t'^.,.?..i. >='• '
.i i;v. ,[" J t J,,i."• �r', Y 1� /:Zir..,_yI�"p•.
A :�� '�� '`t• :�,r, •1'�5l:z:.nitr"'�4 �.vn„ ��• h..,..
�rl tt't�• C,. .y,•. '`;• •''!,• i4 ,q;t.i:y.-'- !•� 4. ri_tt, �:(',�jN."•f3 i! A•'"
'rb 'k.*,,*`•i(,v_ r, t.r, t 't t. •t'` -4.. •`',r�•, r;�irl",t'. . .��'s Y .}..,ti^.{{..,�.fXi, 4v
K' `fir' r ^6 r _ .t. 1 i t a Via: :���xJtr J PY p"I t.. i t•.Tk
9 .� ti; tt t r
t r 1' t 4 ',� .'a 4 t t'kxf.i ,+ > rS tv3'Er �1
s.r ale rs��� i' s r t 5 1 ?a.yg x'at} f
1rt�!�3{2.a tiK ( •i 7 ,•, 1.'t w; r 7 ✓ht,t < I }f t r
YAP F,44'✓ �' : y r: .(T. 1:t4 ,r�
tq�'+tf"7SfY y''aI'i'A..' �� �r` � � .r �i (, � t' t t ar5j , h�
�` •L , . ;,'S i . t ); f :.r"'t S S '~ a l: .� i
[.t ''� 1 1 r l k
1�r�� 1,; x '(. i i 1 ,l t a r },'t r ,` "r. Y.� Mitt
•+ }'JJ a 'ir, i t `t i 1 { , '"' ',. C c a
I y.4ts v�,+i..71t S c t -5 �,n i 1 t' } `
•�, X51 ` t ,) ' , ( ' k.S r •f, r r „ .r. ,)C,1 1�,3'v, '�
` k ,t
till �. 7 r. y ` K E Y,, P
., 1* F tf tip t I—.
. rt ^t ., 'o(. ,r �` ! J , ;-
Itx f-" t*, ' F t t [ r OJECT PERSONNEL . .
r t .) 3''{`.0 s+ .F Y ..f ', t t j ')- .* r;r,Y !
. tat.,.• •`•� t r .'.4.• '1' r , t ' S 2 r '� I f "'I I
!t,, j„ ;{{•'11.� 1 �. ..;. ,a5'S • t t t 1 r t ; 5 Y 1• r� t
I YV q.t., ��}r'r j" , T, 'r �w,'Y j '�..� �'t' Yr r ,f;1 r.'•!'•1 Y•'- [,,{ r ', l•. j��," i:., ,�` t+! •�)/ �,4.''r 41.v ,^ti� .tp�`+�
t .i'' •'.} ..t. `a }• rt y. ,..1... t^,, t t;If';Vk'b ,�l;;r: t=:�!'It'�.�� '�
f '^,}j i?. ,,t•.w ti t., ° 1.t,;, . .r; S• Y ( t •.✓�r4 ( t as r Y ' .'+•Y' •;i'�(`t?i}�• ,Y.,'•'' •r;,. t .Jr•ir r':Y:i Y•�,,,'r.^.f�-�r y,�i1;1. •!y
.t*• ;�j,',r'.'.j.. .,. r^ 'r'• •.t•',i�"e; ,. .:r �. Y:,..,•, C 4; t•� 'N'..yra .r,.' R„[ ,t.. r''
'•'✓ r} ,•�rf .,1,{ ,L°r Y.. �f. 1• : •ST s.+.., .r, t; .t..�: •l1. ��'...k',r4:�, �'.{ '�r'i�.,. Y !/(.
•r, �r a .t•t r r . 'v f { e . 'I' p.,,=.. .Y ~;i• d .•4,'. r vTr JYS4
, r,•4h\ •`�.,t.. + y. a i•,1 ,�; a t;
r
Eng neers Architects Planners
® KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL
The information provided in the following pages of this section outlines
the capabilities and experience of the key professional staff members who
r� would be participants in not only the presently proposed projects, but also
the design and construction management phases of the new garage facility.
{ Project Senior Staff have managed or participated in over 20 Transit
#3 Development Programs and updates and other types of public transportation
planning projects including "504" Transition Plan for a medium-sized,
S
midwestern city. These studies have ranged from a feasibility analysis in
a small city of less than 20,000 population to long-range, fixed guideway
system analysis in a metropolitan area of over 2,000,000 population.
r 4V Other projects of particular relevance include the design of two (2 )
. , rehabilitated and one (1) new maintenance facility for the Corps of
4V.. Engineers at U.S. Army facilities in Germany, the design of several '
t . industrial warehouses which included vehicle storage facilities, and the ; 4
preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment for a new bus garage in
i the Washington, D.C. area.
,- In order to obtain the needed expertise in evaluation of transit
operations, we have included in our team, Mr. Paul G. Marsh. Mr. Marsh has
tits over 30 years of actual management experience in both the maintenance and
route operatons of public transit systems throughout the country.
>? Currently, he is engaged in assisting the transition of the Omnitrans
System in San Bernardino, California, from private to public management.
`AV" i
,; At all times, the project team will be supported by the technical , graphic, „
and clerical personnel required to carry out the work.
:, Il
Engineers Architects Planners
rI
1
I�
Management ,.....�
The leadership of Booker Associates, Inc., is pro- ��
A + n
vided by its three senior officers, whose careers each �.:�'�, ''�
span 20 to 30 years in the consulting engineering pro-
fession. They are James E. Moulder, P.E., President
and Chairman of the Board; Eugene L. Fieldhammer, r
P.E., Executive Vice-President; and Robert C. Flory,
P.E., Senior Vice-President/Operations. '
Their wealth of experience is a resource available
not only to the firm's professional staff on a daily Mr. Flory, Mr. Moulder, and Mr. Fieldhammer. '
basis, but also to the firm's clients in both the public
and private sectors. This experience was gained by
the progression of all three from design respon- Mr. Fieldhammer, Executive Vice-President since
sibilities into the overall business and financial 1973, manages the overall professional and technical
management of the firm. direction of the engineering, architectural and plan-
All three were educated as civil engineers and are ning management efforts of the organization, I �gFro
registered in more than a dozen states. Their ex- including schedules, costs, specifications and {
perience ranges from highway and bridge projects of estimates. T
every sort, through railroad relocations, airport He joined Booker in 1963, as head of the Struc-
design and water resources projects to recreational tural Engineering Department, where he directed the
planning and design. This background is the founda- design of bridges, buildings and industrial structures. ,
tion on which Booker Associates, Inc., continues to Prior consulting engineering experience included the
expand the services it offers its clients. design of major highways and bridges such as the f
President of Booker since 1973, Mr. Moulder Mackinac Straits Bridge and the Kingston-Rhinecliff
directs all the firm's activities as well as the develop- Bridge over the Hudson River. Mr. Fieldhammer was
ment of its professional and corporate policies. He graduated from Kansas State University with a B.S.
has both B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering degree in civil engineering. s'
from the University of Missouri-Columbia. He joined Mr. Flory, a graduate of the University of Illinois
the firm in 1961 as manager of the Civil Engineering with a B.S. degree in civil engineering, provides �!
Department and directed a variety of civil and administrative and technical supervision over quality
municipal engineering work, including urban ex- control, production, personnel and operations for all
rt
pressways, interstate highways and exchanges, departments. He joined Booker in 1962, as a project
arterial streets, sanitary sewer and water systems, engineer, and was named Senior Vice-President in
recreational facilities and industrial development pro- 1975.
jects. He had previously participated in the design of Mr. Flory has directed the design of interstate r
expressways, as well as water transportation, highways, primary rural roads, urban expressways
military airfield and municipal development projects. and city streets, as well as the planning of railroad
Under his direction, Booker has operated offices relocations and the design of airports and airport { r,
in six states and has expanded its scope of services expansion. Water resources-related projects on 1p; `a
to include architecture, landscape architecture and which he has worked include flood insurance
all types of planning. He is listed in Who's Who in the studies, storm water runoff studies and water and
Midwest and in 1977 received the Missouri Honor sewer project designs for cities and government
Award for Distinguished Service in Engineering. agencies.
F
r�I� =��.
�%
Engineers Architects Planners
I
t! 4.
® I .
Edmund C. Johnson, P.E. � f
I'
I
1.
14
1.
L
I
,4
i
Mr. Johnson is manager of the Civil Engineering Department and provides administrative and
technical supervision for the preparation of plans and reports for all civil engineering projects. He W.
was named vice-president of the firm in 1975.
He joined Booker in 1968, and his work as project engineer and project manager has included 1 1,
the direction of design and preparation of plans and specifications in many phases of civil, water
resources, and highway engineering for the Missouri State Highway Department, Illinois
Department of Transportation, St. Louis County Department of Highways and Traffic, the City of
St. Louis, and numerous other governmental and private agencies. The highway work included
major expressways, several urban highway projects and local streets for numerous municipalities.
His work included the supervision of field traffic surveys and the analysis of traffic patterns using
b' origin and destination surveys.
He has also acted as project manager for assignments involving multi-disciplinary teams with
y, responsibility for interdepartment coordination and client liaison. These projects have included
urban mall design, urban renewal projects, parks and recreational facilities, and site investigations
.. and evaluations for potential industrial development. (�
Other projects include the study of storm water runoff, numerous sanitary sewer projects,
3' flood insurance studies, comprehensive plans and recreational master plans. j
a' Prior to joining the Booker organization, Mr. Johnson was employed by a consulting firm and I `I
C
by the Missouri State Highway Department for nine years where he was responsible for highway
design projects ranging from urban and rural interstate to supplementary highways.
Professional Profile #
Purdue University, B.S., Civil Engineering, 1958
? • Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, Oklahoma, Illinois
�E r
Member: Missouri Society of Professional Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Institute of Traffic Engineers
Engineers Club of St. Louis j' 1
Traffic Engineers Association of Metropolitan St. Louis
Drafting and Design Technology Advisory Committee,
St. Louis Community College at Meramec i
J�
7.�,• I
t I {
lid Yy
•,w
ri�i m►ergo•i
Engineers Architects Planners
it
T. Joseph Marking
�1
1;
t" f
i
'I
As senior transportation planner, Mr. Marking is responsible for the preparation of
transportation plans and traffic engineering studies. These studies involve work in such areas as
capacity determination of intersections and roadway segments, signal warrants, impact studies, i
parking deficiencies, goods movement, preparation of public transit development programs,
pedestrian planning, bus priority systems, bikeways, public information surveys, and capital
improvement programs.
Since joining Booker, Mr. Marking has been involved in the preparation of an industrial
development master plan for a former Army ammunition facility; determined the impact of future
traffic volumes on the street system for a major shopping project and for the relocation of a public ;y
transit bus garage; assisted in determining the economic feasibility of the joint use of a military
airfield by civilian aircraft; and provided intersection geometric design for the relocation of two
arterial roadways necessitated by the expansion of a metropolitan airport.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Marking was employed by a transportation-oriented consulting
firm where he was project manager for a variety of projects, including studies in traffic engineering
and safety, pedestrian planning, public transit developments, and airport site selection. He was
also involved in a federal research project to determine the needs of rural freeway motorists. s
He is the subject of a biography in Who's Who in the Midwest, 1976-1977 and 1978-1979
editions, and is past-president of the St. Louis Metropolitan Chapter of the American Planning
Association.
Professional Profile ?>
Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, B.A., Geography, 1967 'j�
Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, M.S., City and Regional Planning, 1972
Member: American Planning Association
American Institute of Certified Planners I'
Missouri Planning Association
Traffic Engineers Association of Metropolitan St. Louis
I�t
ice►�i ri er�+.v li ;'
Engineers Architects Planners '
Thomas A. Cunningham, AICA �I
.1
G i�l S
i
�1
i�
As manager of Booker's Planning Department, Mr. Cunningham is responsible for the
execution of a broad range of economic and Industrial development feasibility studies, urban,
regional, recreational and environmental planning projects as well as the technical supervision ,
and administration of the department. it
® Mr. Cunningham's experience includes private consulting firms as well as service in the ;
public sector. t
While at Booker,he has served as project manager for an industrial development study and
master plan for the City of Farmington, Missouri; directed a market analysis for a proposed
} commercial marina concessions at the Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir; and supervised a
feasibility study for a proposed museum at Nifong Park In Columbia, Missouri. He is currently
serving as project manager on the preparation of a comprehensive economic development plan
for Salt Lake City, Utah. !
Before joining the company, Mr. Cunningham was Director of Planning and Community
Development for Fitchburg, Massachusetts,a city of 40,000,where he had overall responsibility i{
for planning and economic development,as well as management of the city's federal grant pro-
grams. During this time, he served as Executive Secretary to the Industrial Development '
Finance Authority where he administered revenue bond programs and directed the city's role in I �.
seven industrial development projects valued at over$7 million. His responsibilities included
formulation and overall administration of the city's economic development strategy consisting f
of downtown revitalization,industrial redevelopment,capital formation,financial packaging and
grant procurement. !
Major capital Improvement projects for which he has been responsible include construc-
tion of a downtown parking garage and "mini-mall"; a program of downtown landscaping and
public amenities; traffic Improvements; the development of a bikeway system, housing
rehabilitation and construction; and a comprehensive program of city park and playground i
• restoration. h,
Mr. Cunningham's prior experience includes a Massachusetts land planning and urban
design firm and a New Jersey planning and engineering consultant firm. !'I`
III
Professional Profile
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., Master of City and Regional Planning, 1976 '
Syracuse Universtiy, Syracuse, N.Y., B.F.A. Design, 1971
Certified Planner-in-Charge: Missouri
Member: American Institute of Certified Planners (Charter Member)
American Planning Association (Charter Member) i
National Association of Housing and.Redevelopment Officials
it
• jk
�.i••r w�r i iw�� .1
Engineers Architects Planners
�w.
Thurman A. Schweitzer, Jr.
I I
x
' _.
i
II
•W. .1
I
Y
t
t
i
7`
As a senior planner in Booker's Planning Department, Mr.Schweitzer participates in transportation,
environmental and comprehensive planning projects. At Booker, he has provided input to a delivery +:
system analysis for two major daily newspapers,and to a feasibility study of a downtown people mover z
for the City of St.Louis. ,
® Before joining Booker Mr. Schweitzer worked for planning agencies at both local and state levels.
At the local level he was senior planner-in-charge of the transportation section of a metropolitan
planning organization in Illinois, where he supervised all phases of a multi-modal transportation study
which utilized the "3-C" (Comprehensive, Continuing and Cooperative) planning process, and sketch
planning. He was also responsible for the development of an air quality State Implementation Plan, i
a transition plan for a mass transit district, the development of the transportation budget, and a Citizen
Involvement/Title 11 program.
Mr. Schweitzer has also worked for the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) as an
environmental and comprehensive planner.While with IDOT, he was responsible for the development
of environmental impact statements, negative declarations, environmental assessments, noise and air
quality reports,and all environmental permit applications.
Professional Profile
Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville,B.S.,Sociology,1972
�outhern Illinois University-Edwardsville,M.S.,City and Regional Planning,1977
Planner-In-Charge: Missouri
Member: American Planning Association
Engineers Architects Planners
i
.r ..: ' Gregory W. Knauer
c• ii
Mr. Knauer's responsibilities as an environmental planner include investigation and analysis of (,
bio-environmental factors in urban, regional, and recreational planning, and various architectural
® and engineering projects. Currently, Mr. Knauer is participating in projects to develop master plans
and environmental assessments dealing with river navigation projects and national wildlife refuge
areas.
Mr. Knauer has had a principal role in the preparation of land and water resource master
plans, the monitoring of water quality aspects of dredging operations and lake rehabilitation
programs. He assists in the preparation and review of environmental assessments and statements
for water resource management and development projects.
In addition, Mr. Knauer's responsibilities include the investigation and analysis of biological
and environmental factors in regional, recreational, and urban planning and in various engineering
and architectural projects. He participates as a member of interdisciplinary teams on investigations
and projects in which environmental aspects are a consideration.
Mr. Knauer's background includes experience in environmental stress analysis, invertebrate
taxonomy, freshwater and marine bioassays in addition to teaching experience in aquatic ecology i
and Limnology. His educational background includes laboratory and field work in physiology, ;
population dynamics, aquatic biology and environmental assessment of stressed ecosystems.
Professional Profile
University of Missouri-Columbia, B.A., Zoology, 1969 1�
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, M.S.,
Aquatic Ecology, 1979 j!
Member: American Society of Limnology and Oceanography
International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology (;
10.0
h
s
Vvvittl�di
Engineers Architects Planners
PAUL G. MARSH r
Experience
Mr. Marsh is presently associated with ATE Management Company and is
assisting in the transfer of management at Omnitrans in San Bernardino,
California, from a private to public system. Previous to that , he was
General Manager of Omnitrans for four (4) years, which grew from a 26 to 82
bus system serving most of the urbanized area of San Bernardino County,
California. The system provides regular route service and also dial-a-ride
programs for the elderly and handicapped.
=N
During four (4) years as an Associate with Alan M. Voorhees and Associates,
Inc. , Mr. Marsh made appraisals for numerous properties including Montgomery,
Alabama; Albany and Macon, Georgia; the Green Line in Northern Kentucky; ,..
ti
SEMTA in Detroit, Michigan; Manchester, New Hampshire; Lynchburg and Roanoke,
Virginia; and Seattle, Washington. He also participated -in bus and rail Y
transit studies providing expertise on system operations and maintenance
procedures and the development of future routes and cost and revenue
projection. These studies included such locations as Bakersfield,
California; Honolulu, Hawaii ; Des Moines, Iowa; Buffalo, New York; Sao Paulo,
Brazil ; San Jose, Costa Rica; and Stratford, Ontario. The Stratford study
resulted in the implementation of a well-regarded combined fixed route/route
deviation service plan.
Mr. Marsh was Director of Transportation for St. Petersburg, Florida , for '
eleven (11) years. During that time, he was responsible for service to
several communities in the area and provided both regular and dial-a-ride bus
service. He was also with the Duke Power Company which operated several bus
systems throughout North Carolina. During that time, he progressed from
coach operator to supervisor scheduler , claims adjuster , assistant
superintendent, and department superintendent.
0 g kw
a
GWlnuers Architects Planners
f;
PAUL G. MARSH i M
®
Professional Affiliation
t
American Public Transit Association
CAPQTS (California)
t
Florida Bus Association (Past President)
Real Estate License
Selected by the Federal Government as a member of a five (5) man team to set
up a Transportation Computer Program for Virginia Polytechnic Institute. ..r, .+
t
I
` l y
• t
.t
i+
pp 4
1
r�t
IIt
1 '
c� a
�'v"r9'►rrOeor�
r
Engineers Architects Planners
$ � 4
Janet Lenz, P.E. i
a Y'.
� 1
1
Mrs. Lenz is chief,civil section, in the Civil Engineering Department. In this capacity, she is I' rtn
responsible for the design and preparation of construction plans and specifications for site
improvement projects. ►. i�o
Her experience in this field includes directing the preparation of improvement plans for
numerous residential and industrial subdivisions and several development projects for commercial, ► �'
® industrial, governmental, school and park sites.
ei
Improvement plans have consisted of the design of complete site grading, roadways and Nk,
parking areas, storm and sanitary sewers, special drainage conduits and structures and sanitary
treatment facilities. Also included were design of retention basins, preparation of flood plain
studies, hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of waterways as well as supervision of the preparation
of record plats and surveys.
Mrs. Lenz has designed a 2,300-acre urban municipal storm sewer system which consisted of
hydraulic design of storm sewers and ditches and hydrologic arlalysis including development of
rainfall and runoff hydrographs and storage-routing for a retention basin system. She also
performed a hydrologic analysis of a five-lake spillway system by developing the runoff
hydrographs and utilizing a storage-routing procedure.
She has served as assistant project engineer on urban road improvement projects designing
roadway alignment and drainage structures, coordinating with existing facilities, and computing
property adjustments and easements.
Professional Profile _ +
Washington University, B.S., Civil Engineering, 1970
Washington University, M.S., Civil Engineering, 1971
• ;+s.
Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri fiat
Member: American Society of Civil Engineers ;�.�,`
'I
10-9 F
Flyinvers Architects Planners `•
r�[ :.z. '' •-' Robert J. Frascella, P.E.
i I
T
�.
C'"t
�S
t a.
Mr. Frascella, as a project engineer in Booker's Civil Engineering Department, is involved with
the design, plans and specifications of all phases of site development.
At Booker, he has participated in the design of drainage, grading and road layout for a high
explosives machining facility, and geometrics for a 60-acre parking lot with outer ring road to serve r3sx
a shopping center of three major department stores and 80 specialty and service shops.
}
Prior to joining the Booker organization, Mr. Frascella was employed as an engineer for a St.
Louis consulting engineering firm. As project engineer, he directed the design of a large rail and P"Q
barge transfer facility along the Illinois River, with responsibility for layout and design of roadway, : :
railroad, and waterway facilities, drainage structures, obtaining state and federal government ! :N
agency construction permits, and administrative liaison with the client.
As a Certified Value Engineering Task Team leader, he participated in various value
engineering projects, mainly associated with waste water treatment plants and Army ammunition r si
plants.
He has also been actively involved with the sitework portions of various industrial expansion j
projects involving the layout and design of railroad track for yard and spur tracks.
Professional Profile
Oiversity of Da ton, B.T., Civil En ineerin 1972 Y Engineering, 1 ' /
Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri
Certified Value Engineering Task Team Leader : .,•
Member: American Railway Engineering Association r
Water Pollution Control Federation
Missouri Society of Professional Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
,Zr�<z ;
s f-
+{,`•ye SSA:
\I%W 0dlW■
Engineers Architects Planners
® Donald J. Huber, P.E.
!! :'IT
As chief, building nd industrial structures section, Structural Engineering Department, Mr.
9 9• 9 P :��::Via•=.t
Huber is responsible for the execution of structural design and preparation of contract plans and M1;�
specifications. i #}
Since joining Booker, he has been responsible for a number of commercial, industrial, and
institutional buildings involving a variety of materials in accordance with project requirements. {,;y;�.=•.
*veral structures have been located within Seismic Zone 2 and have required rigorous analysis to
able them to withstand severe seismic forces. Such design has been carried through into fir_t" '
construction details in accordance with the latest methodology. ° r
Specific projects with which Mr. Huber has been involved include community buildings; a
230,000 square foot warehouse and parcel distribution facility; several ammunition plants,'
including a $40 million plant for the manufacture of single base powder grains; a facility for the
manufacture of food grade colors; an advanced sewage treatment plant; and many other industrial
structures, equipment supports, tanks, bins, hoppers, and silos. !i
In his previous position as project engineer, he has directed design activities on a variety of i
building projects.These included high-rise office buildings, schools, industrial buildings, hospitals,
and churches.
Prior to joining the Booker organization in 1972, he was employed by a consulting firm and by 1
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. i
Yri.>t'
Professional Prof He
The Citadel, B.S., Civil Engineering, 1959
Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri, Arkansas
�gistered Structural Engineer: Illinois '
net;,
Member: Society f American Military Engineers
IY N
Concrete Council of St. Louis
American Concrete Institute
.i"�
iwo:ai'�se►�►i t
r
Engineers Architects Planners ?
Gerald L. Campbell, P.E. ;
itF�r
r IAN-
si'�rr.
Mr. Campbell is an electrical project engineer in the Mechanical/Electrical Engineering
Department and is responsible for the design and preparation of specifications for electrical power,
�17i:
control and lighting systems. In addition, he directs the work of electrical design engineers and - 6
technicians on the firm's large complex projects.
Since joining the firm, Mr. Campbell has been involved in the design of high-voltage '^
substations and electrical distribution systems, electrical control systems and power and lighting
systems. Recent projects have included a plant wide electric-il y for a large
s p j p power stud
multi-building manufacturing plant, design for renovation of an-t:xtensive resort facility in the
i x
Ozarks, and several power and lighting designs for the firm's architectural projects.
Prior to joining Booker, he was employed by a large consulting engineering firm involved in
petrochemical facility design and related power and control systems. He also worked for several s
years as an electrical power distribution engineer for a large publi:; utility in Oklahoma and while
there was responsible for the design of high-voltage power distribution systems, power systems
planning and studies.
n
z:
Professional Profile i
• University of Missouri-Rolla, B.S., Electrical Engineering, 1970 ;4
Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri, Oklahoma6
•;:af
Member: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
1
`'?
x�;
I
stto7�.►�r ttnal,�r■
Engmws Architects Platinets
I
Edward G. Zuger, Jr., P.E.
� I •E�ti
Mr. Zuger, as chief of the building services section, Mechanical/Electrical Department, Y•r•:;
supervises design and preparation of plans and specifications for heating, ventilation air
conditioning, plumbing, and fire protection systems for all the firm's projects.
Since joining the firm in 1969, his work as design engineer, = '
J g g g , project engineer, and project
manager has included HVAC designs for commercial, institutional and industrial buildings,
wimming pool water filtration systems, refrigeration systems for ice skating rinks, building and
site utility design, as well as air pollution testing and control. '
Among his more recent accomplishments are the HVAC design of a two-floor, 62,000 square
foot mapping facility which included computer areas; a solar-assist heating system with �s
life-cycle-cost report for a 20,000 square foot railroad passenger station; and an energy-saving
feature that reduced the cooling capacity by 30 percent in a laboratory complex operating with ,
more than 100 fume hoods. z .
Prior to joining the Booker organization, Mr. Zuger was employed by one of the nation's
largest consulting firms in Milwaukee where he designed heating, ventilation, and air conditioning ti
installations for commercial and institutional buildings. His projects included the design of a
100,000 pound per hour high-pressure steam heating plant and utility services for the Mayport
Naval Station, ventilation of large vehicular tunnels for the Boston Turnpike Systems and
Wisconsin Interstate System, snow-melting systems, and various HVAC projects,
Early in his career, he was employed by a mechanical contractor for estimating and #
coordinating projects, material, and manpower, and as field supervisor for several storm sewer, I �'
sanitary sewer and water line installations.
Professional Profile +
r
rarquette University, Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering, 1967
egistered Professional Engineer: Missouri
Member: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers = ;
Association of Energy Engineers
}
i
1 i"ti77
L,
1
"^Man
Engineers Architects Ptanrxrs
I
George E. Bergen, P.E.
l �
•-Y I
. S)
1
1 t
I ~}
L
I
• t
1
Mr. Bergen, as chief of the mechanical section, Mechanical/Electrical Department, supervises
design and preparation of plans and specifications for industrial plant layout including process
equipment, piping, and material handling systems, as well as pumping stations and both above
and below ground utilities, including water, steam, gas, and air distribution lines.
His work as project engineer and project manager has included process equipment layout and
® piping design for a food grade dye plant, a CO2 removal system for a brewery, an exhaust gas
scrubber system for removal of radio-active particles, a 1,000-ton chilled water system, a 200-cfs
storm water pumping station, a 2,500-gpm fire pumping station, as well as several other industrial
and utility projects, waste water and sewage treatment plants. i
Prior to joining Booker Associates, Inc., in 1973, Mr. Bergen was employed by
McDonnell-Douglas Corporation for 11 years. In his capacity as senior thermodynamics engineer,
he participated in design and analysis of environmental control, temperature control, atmospheric
contaminant removal, and extravehicular life support systems for both the Gemini and Skylab
spacecraft.
As a certified value engineering task team leader, he has directed the value engineering
review of a project for design of enclosures for automated conveying equipment which included
heating, ventilation, lighting, fire protection, and site work as well as the enclosures themselves. a
1,
1 \J.
1
Professional Profile J.
I ,
Ohio State University, B.S., Mechanical Engineering, 1962
• University of Missouri-Rolla, M.S., Mechanical Engineering, 1970
Certified Value Engineering Task Team Leader f
Registered Professional Engineer: Missouri
Member: American Society of Mechanical Engineers
t
i
A
��VrN�.Q�fi►0
Engineers Architects Planners ,
Alvin A. Vogt, A.I.A.
` �Ff
r t 1
}+ .w
it
Mr. Vogt, as manager of the Architectural Department, is responsible for all the firm's
architectural and landscape architectural design work along with the supervision and
administration of the department staff. The Department has produced designs for municipal,
recreational, commercial, industrial and institutional buildings; national, state and city parks;
historic restoration and preservation projects; central business district redevelopment and
edestrian malls; military industrial complexes; and medical facilities for both government and
private clients. iar
~e 5
Prior to joining Booker, Mr. Vogt was principal of his own firm since 1961, executing a variety
of projects including health care, schools, mental health centers, mental retardation facilities,
office complexes, university structures, banks and commercial buildings.
He has also been employed by an international architectural firm where he was project _
architect for a federal maximum security penitentiary and a Saudi Arabian university, a $4 billion ,
project to create an entire university complex within a five-year framework.
I ,t
Professional Profile ;
B. Architecture, Washington University, 1956
egistered Architect: Missouri and Illinois j
Certificate of the National Council of
Architectural Registration Boards �r*
Member: Corporate, American Institute of Architects
Missouri Council of Architects
s;
f i
1
I r
P:% s« l
Erl(Imc4s Atchllects Planners
Richard Walkenhorst '
fi=
• ��d4
i6
1
As chief, Architectural Section, Mr. Walkenhorst is responsible to the Manager of the Ar-
chitectural Department for the technical and professional management of all architectural3
design projects, and management of the architectural staff. #
Since joining the firm, he has directed or had principal responsibility for the production of
design and contract drawings,specifications,and estimates. Included in his responsibilities are
the development of preliminary graphic presentations; field surveys of existing facilities; pro-
1
gramming; contract administration; and field inspection of projects.
Projects in which he has been involved include detailed design for new construction, and
renovation of existing office buildings, manufacturing and warehouse complexes;public works
and military facilities; extensive energy efficiency surveys for conservation through retrofitting;
cost reductions through value engineering of several major industrial projects; and residential
rehabilitation.
Before joining Booker Associates, Inc., Mr. Walkenhorst worked with other St. Louis A/E ;.
firms, at increasing levels of project design involvement and responsibility. During that period,
he advanced to the position of manager of projects requiring inter-disciplinary coordination and
scheduling.
Professional Profile
t K
University of Kansas, B.S., Architectural Engineering, 1974 4
University of Kansas, Bachelor of Environmental Design, 1974 ;
Certified Value Engineering Task Team Leader
t
Registered Architect: Missouri, Kansas
s
a;
J
12.0
i
Sam
try as s,ir tr�a�►re :. ;. ;:
[ngmoers Architects Planners
Kurt Larson, A.I.A.
W
t
v !/
Mr. Larson is a project architect responsible for the production of design and contracts
drawings, specifications, estimates, programming, contract administration and project 1ri fir
management for a variety of projects.
* Projects he has been involved in include commercial and industrial buildings; child c
development, day care and elderly centers; renovations and additions for several public buildings;
historic restoration projects; commercial mall developments; residential rehabilitations for a public
housing authority and various recreational projects, including swimming pools, a group camp for
the handicapped, a floral conservatory, and a floating visitors' center for the St. Louis riverfront.
As a student, Mr. Larson worked in the Architectural Services Department at Kansas
University, where he produced design and construction drawings for campus landscaping and
renovation projects. He also worked on construction drawings for new buildings and was involved
in campus-wide architectural and planning surveys.
a
i
Professional Profile
Fiversity of Kansas, Bachelor of Architecture, 1973
niversity of Kansas, B.A. (with honors), Sociology and History of Art, 1973
Registered Architect: Missouri t
Member: American Institute of Architects
Society of Architectural Historians
Association for Preservation Technology
't I J19
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Missouri Heritage Trust .
APPENDIX "B"
NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS
® During the performance of this contract, the Consultants
for themselves , their assignees and successors in interest
(hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant") , agrees as
follows :
1. Compliance with Civil Rights Statutes : The Consultant
will comply with all State and Federal Statutes relating to
nondiscrimination, including but not limited to Title 6, Civil
Rights Act of 1964.
2. Compliance with Executive Order: The Consultant will
comply with the provisions of the Executive Order executed by
the Honorable Christopher S . Bond, Governor of Missouri, on
the tenth day of September, 1973 , promulgating a code of fair
practices in regard to nondiscrimination, which is incorporated
herein by reference and made a part of this contract. This
order stipulates that there shall be no discrimination employ-
ment practices by the Consultant, or its subcontractors , if
any, based on race, color, religion, creed, national origin,
sex or age.
3. Compliance with Regulations : The Consultant will comply
with the regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation
• relative to nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted programs _
of the U. S . Department of Transportation (Title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations , Part 21, hereinafter referred to as the
"Regulations") , which are herein incorporated by reference and
made a part of this contract.
4. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant, with regard to
work performed by it after award and prior to completion of
the contract work, will not discriminate on the grounds of
race, color, religion, creed, sex, national origin, or ancestry
of any individual in the selection and retention of sub-
contractors , including procurement of materials and leases of
equipment. The Consultant will not participate either directly
or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Paragraph 21. 5
of the Regulations, including employment practices when the
contract covers a program set forth in Appendix "A" of the
Contract.
5. Solicitations for Subcontractors , Including Procure-
ments of Material and Equipment: .In all solicitations either
by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Consultant
for work to be performed under a subcontract, including pro-
curements of materials or equipment, each .potential subcontractor
or supplier shall be notified by the Consultant of the City' s
obligations under this contract relative to nondiscrimination
on the grounds of race, color, religion, creed, sex, or national
origin or ancestry of any individual.
6. Information and Reports : The Consultant will provide all
information and reports required by the contract, or orders
and instructions is.sued pursuant thereto, and will permit access _
to its books , records , accounts, other sources of information,
and its facilities as may be determined by the City, the Chief
Engineer of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Department ,
(hereinafter referred to as the "Chief Engineer") , or the U. S.
-2-
Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain
® compliance with other such contract , orders and instructions .
Where any information required of the Consultant is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to
furnish this information, the Consultant shall so certify to
the City and set forth what efforts it has made to obtain
the information.
7. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the
Consultant' s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination pro-
visions of this contract, the City shall impose such contract
sanctions as it or the Chief' Engineer may determine to be
appropriate including, but not limited to :
a. Withholding of payments to the Consultant under
the contract until the Consultant complies ,
and/or
b. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the
contract in whole or in part.
8. Incorporation of Provisions : The Consultant will in-
clude the provisions of Paragraphs (1) through (8) in every
subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases
of equipment, unless exempt by the statutes , Executive Order,
Regulations , or instructions issued pursuant thereto. The
• Consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract
or procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless
exempt by the statutes , Executive Order, Regulations , or in-
structions issued pursuant thereto. The Consultant will take
such action with respect to any subcontract or procurements as
-3-
the City, the Chief Engineer or the U.S . Department of Trans-
portation may direct as means of enforcing such provisions ,
including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that
in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is
threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier
as a result of -such direction, the Consultant may request the
Chief Engineer to enter into litigation to protect the interest
of the Chief Engineer, and in addition, the Consultant may re-
quest the United States to enter into such litigation to pro-
tect the interests of the United States.
F
_4-