Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
7I Reso 13-4922 Compensation Plan & Salary Ranges (Full time and Part-time)
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 4, 2013 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Jose E. Pulido, City Manager By: Tracey L. Hause, Administrative Services Director AGENDA ITEM 7.1. SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 13-4922 ADOPTING A COMPENSATION PLAN AND SALARY RANGES FOR FULL TIME AND PART-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013-14 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution No. 13=4922 (Attachment "A"), adopting a Compensation Plan and salary ranges for full time and part-time classifications for FY 2013-14. BACKGROUND: 1. In 1995, the City completed a comprehensive salary study. 2. On June 10, 1999, a compensation survey, proposed reclassifications, and recommendations regarding salary grids and cost of living adjustment were considered by the City Council. The minutes indicate that after a lengthy discussion, the City Council agreed the previously approved plan should remain the same. There is no other record found of the City adopting a formal classification and compensation study or plan. 3. On March 7, 2000, the City Council adopted a list of survey cities for City staff to use for salary comparisons. 4. On June 19, 2012, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2012-13 City Budget. The adopted City Budget include.d an appropriation of $30,000 for a City Classification and Compensation Study ("Study") in which plans for Classification and Compensation ("Plans") would be developed. 5. On June 26, 2012, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Study. City Council June 4, 2013 Page 2 of 5 6. On July 13, 2012 at 6:00 p.m., the deadline for proposals, the City received three proposals. 7. On August 7, 2012, the City Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate a professional services agreement with Ralph Anderson & Associates ("consultant') for a Study. 8. On August 8, 2012, the City executed a professional services agreement with Ralph Anderson & Associates for a Study. This Study covered both full time and part-time employees. 9. On December 18, 2012, the City Council adopted revised Personnel Rules for full time and part-time employees. 10. On December 21, 2012, staff meet with the then City Council Mid-Year Budget Ad Hoc Committee (i.e., Mayor Pro Tem Blum and Councilmember Vincent Yu) to review the draft Study. The City Council Ad Hoc Committee provided further direction to staff and the consultant. 11. On January 1, 2013, the staff administratively implemented revised employee evaluation process for all City staff. 12. On April 24 and April 29, 2013, staff met with the City Council Budget Ad Hoc Committee, (i.e., Mayor Sternquist and Councilmember Vizcarra) to review the draft Plans and the Pay for Performance Bonus Plan and they recommended that the City Council adopt Plans for all City employees. Further they recommended the City Council adopt the Pay for Performance Bonus Plan for employees in the City's personnel system (i.e., regular employees). Pay for Performance Bonuses for at-will employees are stipulated by employment agreements. ANALYSIS: With increasing public scrutiny over the past few years about how public employees are recognized and rewarded, cities are making changes and have established new norms and best practices for compensation or their employees. Cities have moved from a traditional step-based merit system to one that is based on performance and tied to goals through strategic leadership planning. Some of the new norms and best practices include: • Emphasis on total compensation; • Flexible job bands and broader pay ranges with defined criteria regarding placement with a range based on skill and competency; City Council June 4, 2013 Page 3 of 5 • More job market driven; • Greater emphasis on results and less on longevity; • Flatter pay structures-fewer pay levels and fewer job classifications; and • Pay for performance model tied to evaluation tools. With the reorganization, merging Finance, Personnel and Information Technology into a new Administrative Services Department approved by the City Council as part of the FY 2011-12 City Budget, the Administrative Services Department has been addressing inconsistencies with the current practices related to personnel matters and has recommended up-to-date best practices. Staff has approached this endeavor in three phases: • The First Phase was to complete a thorough review and revision of the current Personnel Policies to ensure consistency with the City's Charter and Municipal Code and make sure they are not in conflict with Federal and State law and in accordance with personnel best practices; • The Second Phase was to admm1stralively rev1se the current employee performance evaluation process; and • The Third Phase was to complete a review of all current job classifications (Classification Plan) and compensation (Compensation Plan) and request that the City Council consider a Pay for Performance Bonus Plan for regular employees. The Compensation Plan is the second. of three reports. The first report addressed the Classification Plan and the third report will address the Pay for Performance Bonus Plan. A compensation plan is an important element in a personnel system. This Compensation Plan is intended to: • Ensure that the City has the ability to attract and retain well-qualified employees; • Provide a technically sound basis for compensating employees; • Allow flexibility and adaptability for making City-wide compensation decisions based on changing market conditions; City Council June 4, 2013 Page 4 of 5 • Recognize the City's responsibility as a public agency in establishing a pay plan that is consistent with prudent public practices; and • Ensure that the City's compensation practices are competitive and consistent with those of comparable employers. The consultant has completed the Compensation Plan (Exhibit "1" of Resolution No. 13-4821) which includes a market survey using the recommended list of survey agencies, analysis of the market and data, documented comparisons with the City's current compensation and presents the findings for City Council's consideration as part of the budget process. The consultant found that a majority ofthe survey reference for base salaries in the job classifications were more than 5% above the market median (13 out of 24 classifications). On average, the City's base salaries for all job classifications were 8.6% above market median. However, when considering total compensation (i.e., base salary, employee's contribution for retirement paid by employer, insurance, leave and other benefits), the City's total compensation on average, for all classifications, were only 1.3% above the median. CONCLUSION: In order to ensure complete parity for all employees within the organization, it is recommended the City Council adopt the Compensation Plan as presented and the City Council establish that the base pay for 22 positions is at the median of the comparison cities outlined and documented in the Compensation Plan. Exhibits 2 and. 3 of Resolution No. 13-4922 proposes revised salary schedules implementing the base salary adjustments for full time and part-time classifications. FISCAL IMPACT: It is recommended the revised salary schedules be implemented with the pay-period beginning June 28, 2013. There will be a number of positions whose current salary exceeds the top step in the proposed salary range, and as a result they will not be eligible for step increases until new .survey data supports an increase in their job compensation. These employees will maintain their current rate of pay and will be considered "Y" rated. All employees will also maintain their current level of benefits. ATTACHMENT: A. Resolution No. 13-4922 Adopting a Compensation Plan and Salary Ranges for City Council June 4, 2013 Page 5 of 5 Full-Time and Part-Time Classifications for FY 2013-14 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION N0.13-4922 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPENSATION PLAN AND APPROVING SALARY RANGES FOR FULL TIME AND PART-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2013-14 WHEREAS, Section 802 of the City Charter slates, "The city council, by resolutions, shall from time to time establish the salaries and/'or other forms of compensation for each officer or employee of the city." WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temple City adopted revised Personnel Rules for full time and part-time employees on December 18; 2012. WHEREAS, Article 5, Section 1, of the revised Personnel Rules hereby states that, "The position classification plan shall be so developed and maintained and that all positions substantially similar with respect to duties, authority, responsibility and working conditions are included within the same class, and that the same schedules of compensation may be made to apply with equity under the working conditions to all positions in the same class." WHEREAS, The City Manager has completed the attached Compensation Plan (Exhibit 1) and Salary Schedules for full time (Exhibit 2) and part-lime classifications (Exhibit 3). NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temple City does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the Compensation Plan. SECTION 2. The City Council establishes the base pay of all positions to be the median of the comparison cities outlined in the Compensation Plan, SECTION 3. The City Council approve.s the salary ranges and steps applicable to all full time and part-time employees. The attached compensation schedules (Exhibits 2 and 3) shall be effective June 28, 2013, and are identified as "City of Temple City Full-Time Monthly Salary Ranges" and "Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges" for FY 2013-14. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 4th day of June 2013. MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................ 2 EFFECTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS ··········································•········································································· 2 STUDY0EJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................ 2 SECTION II METHODOLOGIES ........................................................................................... 4 LAEOR MARKET SURVEY PARAMETERS .............................................................................................................. 4 MARKET DATA COLLECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 5 POINT OF COMPARISON ...................................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION III COMPENSATION FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 7 SALARY SURVEY RESULTS -BASE PAY ............................................................................................................... 7 SALARY SURVEY RESULTS -BENEFITS ............................................................................................................... 9 BENCHMARK CLASSIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 10 INTERNAL SALARY RElATIONSHIPS .................................................................................................................. 10 SALARY RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 10 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... ll APPENDIX A BASE DATASHEETS .................................................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B BENEFIT DATA SHEETS ............................................................................. B-1 APPENDIX C SALARY RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... C-1 Ralph Andersen & Associates SECTION I PROJECT OVERVIEW Ralph Andersen & Associates was retained by the City of Temple City to conduct a Classification & Compensation study involving all the City's job classifications. This report presents the results of the compensation study through the following sections: • Section I -Project Overview • Section II -Methodologies • Section III -Compensation Findings & Recommendations Specific recommendations and additional supporting documents have been provided separately from this report. This report highlights the overall findings and recommendations. Effective Compensation Plans The City's compensation plan is one of the most important elements in its personnel system. Combining a sound compensation system with an effective classification system contributes to the overaii effectiveness of an orgamzahon. In broad terms, the City s compensation plan should: • Ensure that the City has the ability to attract and retain well-qualified employees • Provide a defensible and technically sound basis for compensating employees • Allow flexibility and adaptability for making City-wide compensation decisions based on changing market conditions • Recognize the City's responsibility as a public agency in establishing a pay plan that is consistent with prudent public practices • Ensure that the City's compensation practices are competitive and consistent with those of comparable employers. Policy decisions resulting from the compensation study will ultimately balance the above goals with the City's ability to pay and other budget priorities. Study Objectives Based on the identified needs of the City, this shldy was designed to achieve the following overall objectives: • Update the job classification system to reflect current roles, duties, and responsibilities • Recommend title changes and prepare new and updated job descriptions • Conduct a market survey using the City's established list of survey agencies • Analyze the market data and document comparisons with the City's compensation plan 2 Ralph Andersen & Associates • Present the findings and recommendations for the City's consideration during the budget process. The methodologies used to accomplish these objectives are presented in Section II. 3 Ralph Andersen & Associates SECTION II METHODOLOGIES This section provides an overview of the methodologies that have been used to conduct the compensation analyses and develop specific recommendations. Specific methods and systems presented include: • Labor Market Survey Parameters • Survey Job Selection • Market Data Collection Process • Point of Comparison. All methodologies used by Ralph Andersen & Associates are consistent with established professional standards of compensation. Labor Market Survey Parameters One of the most important policy components of a compensation plan is a definition of the labor market within which the City must compete. There are typically five important criteria utilized in identifying those employers that comprise an agency's labor market. They are: • Historical Practices -Over time, an employer will develop some level of continuity regarding labor market comparables for the purposes of conducting compensation surveys. There may be a strong history of surveying a specific set of employers either by agreement or by practice. Survey agencies can be specifically identified or they can be defined by characteristics such as size or proximity. Historical practices are an important consideration if for no other reason than deviating from historical practices typically requires a strong, defensible rationale. • Geographic Proximity -Geographic proximity of potential employers is one of the most important factors utilized in identifying an organization's labor market. This factor is particularly useful because it identifies those employers that directly compete with the City to recruit and retain personnel. If a sufficient number of comparable agencies exist within close proximity to the City, the defined geographic area may be confined to an area among surrounding cities or counties. If comparably sized or similar services do not exist within close proximity, a wider geographic region may be necessary. • Employer Size -As a rule, the more similar employers are in size and complexity, the greater the likelihood that comparable positions exist within both organizations. For cities, the size of possible survey agencies can most easily be measured using population statistics, operating budget, and number of employees. • Nature of Services Provided-In order to ensure comparable jobs are found when conducting a market survey, it is important to utilize employers that provide similar services to the City of Temple City. Employers who provide similar services are most likely to compete with one another for employees and may have similar organizational and operational characteristics. This factor typically eliminates the use of private sector employers since few comparable jobs exist within these types of employers. • Economic Similarity -While there are a number of economic factors that can be compared among cities, the most important factor related to compensation is cost of 4 Ralph Andersen & Associates living. In some regions or states, living costs can vary significantly and have an important impact on how potential candidates evaluate compensation. This factor is important if labor market agencies are used beyond the local market. Using the above criteria, and in consultation with the City of Temple City, the following 18 agencies have been used in the compensation survey: ERI Pop 1 Agency COL Distance Index 2 56,546 Cily of Arcadia 114.1 3.9 46,618 City of Azusa 87.4 9.7 75,830 City of Baldwin Park 86.8 8.9 35,300 City of Claremont 93.5 23.6 48,038 City of Covina 88.1 13.6 55,819 City of Diamond Bar 83.9 20.1 21,411 City of Duarte 96.1 8.0 50,361 City of Glendora 89.7 13.1 39,987 City of La Puente 95.1 11.4 31,461 City of La Verne 98.4 21.1 36,727 City of Monrovia 112.7 5.5 62,857 City of Montebello 93.7 9.3 61 '153 City of Monterey Park 95.2 6.0 ""·''"' '-'"Y v' ••• v 33,499 City of San Dimas 93.9 16.3 39,926 City of San Gabriel 103.6 3.4 25,725 City of South Pasadena 120.8 6.3 29,661 City of Walnut 83.2 19.2 35,749 City of Temple City 100.0 1 Source: CA Dept of Finance 'Source: Economic Research Institute Cost of Living While the list of cities includes more than is necessary for a compensation survey, it does cover the City's historical practices as well as comparable cities in the San Gabriel region. All survey agencies participated in the survey and provided both salary and benefits information. As part of its compensation policies, the City needs to determine an appropriate competitive market position. This typically begins at the middle of the market such as the market mean or median. This should provide salary levels that minimize recruitment and retention issues and provide a fair basis of paying employees. Market Data Collection Process To ensure reliability and completeness, survey data was collected according to a structured methodology. In conducting the compensation survey, the following specific steps were taken: • Survey employers were contacted to confirm participation and to request background information including current salary schedules, benefits information, and organizational charts 5 ' Ralph Andersen & Associates • Salary schedules and other documentation were analyzed for each survey agency in order to determine comparability issues and obtain salary /benefit data • Follow-up reviews were conducted by e-mail and telephone to verify and clarify the data to ensure accuracy and comparability. Throughout the data collection process, careful efforts were made to document the full range of duties and requirements of all job classes as compared to the City's corresponding survey classes. When conducting labor market surveys, one of the most important objectives is to ensure that the labor market data is sufficiently comparable to City jobs while also serving as a strong indicator of market trends. Since the purpose of the labor market analysis is to identify general wage trends with other agencies, broad comparability guidelines are used when collecting data. If the comparability guidelines are too narrow, then insufficient data will be found. Common comparability criteria typically include similar core functional duties, education/skill requirements, level of duties, and scope of supervisory and management duties. It is not as critical for all job duties to be the same or for the number of employees supervised to be the same. Furthermore, it is not essential that comparable market jobs use the same equipment, have L1e same workload, or work in an identical facility. While Ralph Andersen & Associates has been careful not to include "gross" job comparisons, there will be some variability in the job matches. In some instances, a comparable market job may exceed the responsibilities and duties of the City's job and in other cases, the market job may perform duties at a slightly lower level. Overall, the market comparabilities are intended to provide a balanced indication of market trends. Wherever possible, comparability similarities and differences are supported by class specifications and other documentation received from the survey participant. However, it should be noted that job descriptions were not used as a primary basis for establishing comparabilities due to their unreliability and the inconsistent formats used in the survey agencies. Many agencies are unable to sufficiently maintain and update their job descriptions while other agencies use job description formats that provide little insight into the actual job duties of the class. Point of Comparison When comparing City salaries with market agencies, it is important to establish a consistent point of comparison. Since all the survey agencies used in the market study utilize pay range structures, a critical review was needed to find the salary range "control point." This is the point in the salary range that: • Is used to "anchor" the pay range to the labor market • Employees will attain through step or other increases based on satisfactory performance (range progression beyond the control point is usually based on superior job performance) • The majority of employee salaries cluster around as measured by calculating a compa- ratio (employee salary divided by the range maximum). For the vast majority of agencies, the salary range maximum (top step) is the reference control point. Longevity steps, one-time lump sum payments, and incentive pays are not included in this comparison. These salaries are compared to the City's salary range. Ralph Andersen & Associates SECTION III COMPENSATION FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS This section of the report documents the key findings and observations resulting from the consultant's compensation analyses. The focus of the compensation analysis is to identify significant differences in the pay practices of the City as compared to the other labor market agencies. Ideally, the City should be consistent with any pay or benefit item that is a common practice in the market (half or more of the survey agencies). Salary Survey Results -Base Pay Based on an evaluation of the survey data, general salary trends in the marketplace have been identified. A summary of the salary survey using the labor market employers and the market median is provided in the following graph. Base Salary 7 6 1 0 Morethan -20%to--15%to--10%to--5%to0% 0%to5% 5%to10% 10%-to15%15%to20% 20%or -20% 15% 10% 5% more Relationship to Market Median As indicated in the graph, the majority of the survey reference jobs are more than 5% above the market median. On average, the City's salaries are 8.6% above market median with a market rank at the 75th percentile (25 percent of the 18 survey agencies pay higher than the City and 75 percent pay lower). 7 Ralph Andersen & Associates Based on the overall results of the survey, the City's salary ranges are competitive with the 18 survey agencies used in the compensation survey. The consultants also analyzed a more narrow set of market agencies, reducing the market comparables from 18 agencies to 12. Similar results were found with the smaller market with an overall market position at the 71" percentile. The following table provides a detailed summary of the market survey results. This summary table includes: • The job title surveyed • The City's current monthly range maximum (step 7) • The market median of comparable matches in the market • The percentage above/below the market median • The market mean of comparable matches in the market • The percentage above/below the market mean. The base salary datasheets are contained in Appendix A. Class Title 29.0% Class Title Recreation II Tree Data was also collected for job functions that did not have a City equivalent, but were helpful in understanding market trends. These job titles are indicated by the word "drift" to reflect that they are market drift checks for common job functions. Salary Survey Results -Benefits In addition to base salary, the consultants also analyzed the employer cost for the following benefits: • Cash benefits including deferred compensation and retirement pick-up (employee contribution paid by the employer) • Insurance benefits including health, dental, and vision insurance • Retirement benefits including employer retirement contributions • Leave benefits including holiday, sick, and vacation leave. Our analysis indicates that the City's benefits are slightly lower than the labor market. Our specific findings are as follows: • Half of the survey agencies pay all or a portion of the employee's PERS retirement contribution (referred to as Retirement Pick-up). In addition, there are a few agencies that have longevity pay and employer paid deferred compensation. The combination of these differences results in a 5.3% loss in market position when base salaries and cash benefits are combined. Thus, while the City is 8.4% above market median on average, when cash benefits are added to the comparisons, the City is 3.0% above market median. • The City's insurance contributions are below the market median, which results in almost a 1.8% further loss in market position when insurance benefits are added to base salary and cash benefits. Thus, the City's market position when cash and insurance benefits are added to base salary is 1.3% above market median. The City is 8-4% above median on average when base salaries for all survey jobs are compared to the market, and the City is 1.3% above median when benefits are included in the analysis. Market differences within 3% of median are not considered significant. Detailed datasheets for benefits are provided in Appendix B. 9 Ralph Andersen & Associates Benchmark Classifications Since it is impossible to compare all of the City's jobs to comparable market jobs, tbe objective of a mar\<.et based compensation study is to identify wage differences for selected "benchmark" classes. Benchmark classes are jobs that are easily compared witb the pay practices of other agencies and are directly comparable to many City jobs. For example, while the City has multiple levels within tbe Park Maintenance Worker class series, it is not necessary to obtain data for all levels since they are highly interrelated. This process not only maximizes tbe use of available market data but also preserves important salary relationships tbat currently exist in the City's compensation plan. For tbis report, market data has been used to benchmark as many classes as possible unless existing internal relationships have a greater priority in maintaining existing equity between related classes. This is particularly important for job classes tbat are recognized to be unique to the City. Thus, the summary table on page nine of tbis report shows market data for informational purposes, even tbough classes in tbe survey may not be selected as benchmark classes. Internal Salary Relationships For non-benchmark classifications, salary levels are established using internal relationship guidelines among related job classes. As a rule of thumb, differences between classes in a job series are typically expressed as a 5% to 10% difference in salary. Differences between supervisory and subordinate classes are typically 15% to 20%, depending on tbe number of le:usls and tlu~ diffe-.:ences in :t:esponsihiljty In most instances these differentials are reflected in tbe City's current salary plan, tbus, tbe consultants are simply preserving established historical pay practices. These internal relationship guidelines build off benchmark job classes or classes that are closely related to tbe job series being analyzed. Since the benchmark classes serve as the basis for any internal relationship guidelines, tbe entire pay plan is anchored to the labor market. Salary Recommendations Using tbe methodologies described above, salary range recommendations have been prepared for all study classes (full time and part time) and are shown in Appendix C. As a starting point, tbe consultants prepared salary range recommendations where all benchmark classifications were set equal to tbe market median. The salary recommendations presented in Appendix C include the following information: • Recommended class title (from tbe results oftbe classification study) • Current class title • Current range maximum montbly salary for each class • Market median salary for benchmark jobs • The recommended range maximum • Percentage change between the new range maximum and the current maximum ~0 Ralph Andersen & Associates • Internal alignment/salary setting rationale for the salary recommendation (benchmark or internal relationship) The salary setting rationale identifies the reliance placed upon labor market data versus internal relationships in developing each specific recommendation. Beyond market considerations, internal relationship guidelines were established and applied within class series. Summary The results of the Compensation Study indicated that the City's compensation plan is competitive with the labor market. While there are significant differences in the cash benefits provided by the City of Temple City compared to the labor market, these differences will diminish as retirement plans come into compliance with recent state laws . ••••• 11 A endix APPENDIX A BASE DATASHEETS A-1 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Accountant Agency Comparable Class Title City of Diamond Bar Senior Accountant City of Temple City Accountant City of Arcadia Accountant City of Monterey Park Accountant City of Monrovia Accountant II City of Duarte Accountant City of La Verne Accountant City of Claremont Accountant City of Azusa Accountant City of Glendora Accountant City of Baldwin Park Accountant City of Montebello Accountant City of Covina Accountant City of La Puente No Comparable Class City of Rosemead No Comparable Class City of San Dimas No Comparable Class City of San Gabriel No Comparable Class City of South Pasadena No Comparable Class City of Walnut No Comparable Class Number of Observations 12 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina -5048 longevity max (H) City of Diamond Bar-only level City of San Dimas-Sr. Accting Tech-4339-5247; Accting Tech-3590-4339 1 Minimum C.P./Max $ 5,228 $ 7,006 $ 5,126 $ 6,485 $ 4,826 $ 6,027 $ 4,699 $ 6,011 $ 4,658 $ 5,945 $ 4,740 $ 5,790 $ 4,737 $ 5,757 $ 4,703 $ 5,682 $ 4,680 $ 5,643 $ 4,421 $ 5,374 $ 3,802 $ 5,095 $ 3,976 $ 5,075 $ 3,856 $ 5,048 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 5,704 12.04% $ 5,720 11.80% 95th Percentile Print Date: 51812013 i Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Accounting Assistant Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Azusa Account Specialist II City of Monrovia Accounts Specialist City of Claremont Accounting Assistant City of Monterey Park Account Clerk City of San Gabriel Finance Clerk II City of Arcadia Accounting Technician II City of Walnut Accounting Assistant City of South Pasadena Accounting Clerk City of Covina Account Clerk II City of Montebello Account Clerk II City of La Puente Accounting Assistant City of La Verne Account Clerk II City of Baldwin Park Finance Clerk City of Diamond Bar No Comparable Class City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of Glendora No Comparable Class City of Rosemead No Comparable Class City of San Dimas No Comparable Class City of Temple City Accounting Assistant (Drift) Number of Observations 13 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina-3766 longevity max (F) City of Glendora-Accounting Tech-3185-3871 City of Monrovia-Accounts Assistant 3093-3948 $ 3,696 $ 4,447 $ 3,353 $ 4,280 $ 3,453 $ 4,172 $ 3,257 $ 4,167 $ 3,266 $ 3,968 $ 3,173 $ 3,960 $ 3,085 $ 3,938 $ 3,038 $ 3,693 $ 3,023 $ 3,674 $ 2,804 $ 3,579 $ 2,930 $ 3,561 $ 2,877 $ 3,496 $ 2,482 $ 3,326 %Abovet Market Below Value Market $ 3,866 -- $ 3,938 -- 2 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Technician i Payable Specialist of Diamond Bar Technician of Arcadia of Monrovia of Claremont Assistant of La Puente of San Gabriel of Glendora of South Pasadena of Rosemead Specialist City of La Verne No Comparable Class of Montebello No Comparable Class No Class of Observations 15 Moderate Footnotes City of Baldwin Park-3 at this level1 at Finance Clerk level City of Covina-4751 longevity max (H) City of Azusa -Account Spec II -3696-444 7 City of Glendora-over payroll City of Monrovia-Payroll Technician 3980-5060 City of Arcadia-Senior Accounting Tech: 3679-4595 Data Effective December 2012 Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max 4,088 $ 4,257 $ 5,128 $ 3,793 $ 5,083 $ 4,061 $ 5,069 $ 4,164 $ 5,022 $ 3,714 $ 4,741 $ 3,796 $ 4,586 $ 3,660 $ 4,449 $ 3,629 $ 4,412 $ 3,585 $ 4,356 $ 3,590 $ 4,339 $ 3,504 $ 4,259 $ 3,435 $ 4,175 $ 3,037 $ 4,070 $ 2,909 $ 3,936 Market Below Value Market 3 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Administrative Services Director Agency Comparable Class Title City of Glendora Deputy City Manager/Admin Services City of Azusa Administrative Services Director/CFO City of Monrovia Administrative Services Director/ACM City of Arcadia Administrative Services Director City of La Puente Director of Administrative Services Citv of San Dimas Asst. CM/Director of Admin Serv/Treasurer City of Temole City Administrative Services Director City of Monterey Park Dir of Management Services City of Walnut ACM/Director of Finance City of San Gabriel Finance Director City of Montebello Director of Finance City of Baldwin Park Finance Director City of Rosemead Director of Finance City of Covina Director of Finance City of South Pasadena Finance Director City of Claremont No Comparable Class City of Diamond Bar No Comparable Class City of Duarte No Comparable Class Citv of La Verne No Comparable Class Number of Observations 14 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina ~ 11919 longevity max (H); Dir of HR-7837-9463 City of San Gabriel-ACM -10271-13032-over HR Cily of Duarte-ACM is over; HR Mgr-6621-8105 City of Diamond Bar-ACM is over; HR Mgr-6693-8969 City of Monrovia -Dir of HR and Risk Mgmt, same range City of Monterey Park-Dir of HR and Risk Mgmt, same range Minimum $ 11,766 $ 9,376 $ 10,153 $ 10,905 $ 10,186 $ 9,780 $ 9,667 $ 9,657 $ 10,088 $ 9,937 $ 8,207 $ 9,158 $ 7,823 Market Value $ 12,424 $ 12,330 51st Percentile City of Claremont-Personnel Srvcs Mgr-7150-8636; ACM is over Personnel, City Clerk, IT, & Community Info 4 C.P./Max $ 14,694 $ 14,393 $ 14,077 $ 12,679 $ 12,470 $ 12,381 $ 12,376 $ 12,333 $ 12,326 $ 12,262 $ 12,083 $ 11,583 $ 11,104 $ 11,068 $ 10,483 %Above/ Below Market -0.39% 0.37% Print Date: 5/B/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Associate Planner Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Monterey Park Associate Planner $ 5,492 $ 7,026 City of Diamond Bar Associate Planner $ 7,006 City of Duarte Associate Planner $ 6,887 City of Montebello Associate Planner $ 5,402 $ 6,570 City of Monrovia Associate Planner $ 5,129 $ 6,546 City of Temple City Associate Planner $ 5,126 $ 6,485 City of Claremont Associate Planner $ 6,468 City of San Dimas Associate Planner $ 6,388 City of Arcadia Associate Planner $ 6,332 City of Azusa Associate Planner $ 5,247 $ 6,332 City of San Gabriel Associate Planner $ 6,329 City of South Pasadena Associate Planner $ 6,134 City of Rosemead Planner $ 5,989 City of Glendora Associate Planner $ 5,926 City of Walnut Associate Planner $ 4,608 $ 5,879 City of Baldwin Park Associate Planner $ 5,872 City of Covina Associate Planner $ 5,748 City of La Verne Associate Planner $ 5,708 City of La Puente Associate Planner %Above/ Number of Observations 17 Market Below Variability Low Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 6,302 2.82% Labor Market Median $ 6,332 2.36% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 70th Percentile Footnotes 5 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Building Inspector Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Monterey Park Buildinq Inspector $ 5,411 $ 6,923 Citv of Temple Citv Building ln~ctor $ 5,084 $ 6,432 City of Azusa Building Inspector $ 5,147 $ 6,211 City of San Gabriel Building Inspector $ 5,062 $ 6,154 City of San Dimas Building Inspector $ 5,002 $ 6,052 City of Monrovia Building Inspector $ 4,583 $ 5,850 City of Arcadia Combination Inspector $ 4,595 $ 5,737 City of Claremont Building Inspector $ 4,431 $ 5,353 City of Glendora Building Inspector $ 4,391 $ 5,338 City of Covina General Building Inspector II $ 4,243 $ 5,158 City of Baldwin Park Building Inspector $ 3,718 $ 4,982 City of Montebello Combination Building Inspector $ 3,510 $ 4,480 I City of Diamond Bar No Comparable Class City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of La Puente No Comparable Class City of La Verne No Comparable Class City of Rosemead No Comparable Class City of South Pasadena No Comparable Class City of Walnut No Comparable Class %Above/ Number of Observations 11 Market Below Variability High Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 5,658 12.03% Labor Market Median $ 5,737 10.81% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 93rd Percentile Footnotes City of Covina-5287 longevity max (F) 6 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Building/Housing Assistant Agency Comparable Class Title City of San Gabriel Permit Technician City of Duarte Community Development Technician City of Temple City Building/Housing Assistant City of Azusa Building Technician City of Diamond Bar Permit Technician City of Arcadia Building Technician? City of San Dimas Building Permit Technician City of Monrovia Building Counter Technician City of Covina Permit Technician City of Claremont Building Permit Technician City of Monterey Park Building Clerk City of Glendora Building Technician City of Baldwin Park Construction Clerk City of Montebello Building Services Technician City of La Puente No Comparable Class City of La Verne No Comparable Class City of Rosemead No Comparable Class City of South Pasadena No Comparable Class Citv of Walnut No Comparable Class Number of Observations 13 Variability High Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina-4496 longevity max (F) City of Monterey Park -Permit Technician II 4324-5532 City of La Puente-Planning Asst PT 2701-3283 7 Minimum C.P./Max $ 4,619 $ 5,609 $ 4,314 $ 5,394 $ 3,896 $ 4,931 $ 4,060 $ 4,890 $ 3,522 $ 4,720 $ 3,771 $ 4,708 $ 3,768 $ 4,553 $ 3,551 $ 4,532 $ 3,608 $ 4,386 $ 3,628 $ 4,383 $ 3,392 $ 4,340 $ 3,520 $ 4,278 $ 2,481 $ 3,325 $ 2,602 $ 3,321 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 4,495 8.84% $ 4,532 8.09% 84th Percentile Print Date: 5/B/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max City Clerk Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Glendora City Clerk City of La Puente City Clerk City of Diamond Bar City Clerk Citv of South Pasadena CitvCierk Citv of Temol~ Citv Citv Cleric City of Claremont City Clerk City of Rosemead City Clerk City of Montebello City Clerk City of La Verne City Clerk City of Duarte City Clerk City of San Dimas City Clerk City of Walnut City Clerk City of Arcadia No Comparable Class City of Azusa No Comparable Class City of Baldwin Park No Comparable Class City of Covina No Comparable Class City of Monrovia No Comparable Class City of Monterey Park No Comparable Class Citv of San Gabriel No Comoarable Class Number of Observations 11 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Baldwin Park-City Clerk-2400/annual City of Covina -City Clerk -2400/annual City of San Gabriel -City Clerk-3000/annual City of Azusa -City Clerk-3090; Asst City Clerk-4784-5671 City of Montebello -Elected City of Monterey Park-Elected; $500 a month Cily of Arcadia-Elected; $6,000 per year 8 $ 8,843 $ 11,044 $ 8,064 $ 9,803 $ 6,860 $ 9,193 $ 6,596 $ 8,840 $ 6,834 $ 8,646 $ 7,150 $ 8,638 $ 6,255 $ 8,462 $ 8,340 $ 8,340 $ 6,690 $ 8,131 $ 6,868 $ 8,064 $ 6,363 $ 7,734 $ 5,936 $ 7,576 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 8,711 -0.76% $ 8,462 2.13% 60th Percentile Print Date: 5/8/2013 i ! ! ' Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Community Development Director Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Glendora Planning/Redevelopment Director $ 11,540 $ 14,412 City of Arcadia ACM/Development Services Director $ 11,486 $ 14,346 City of Monrovia Director of Community Development $ 9,376 $ 14,077 City of San Dimas Asst. CM for Community Development $ 13,620 City of Azusa Economic & Community Dev Director $ 13,340 City of Diamond Bar Community Development Director $ 9,693 $ 12,989 City of Duarte Director of Community Development $ 10,224 $ 12,595 City of Claremont Community Development Director $ 10,396 $ 12,559 City of La Puente Director of Development Services $ 10,905 $ 12,470 City of Monterey Park Dir of Development Services $ 9,667 $ 12,333 City of Montebello Director of Planning and CD $ 9,937 $ 12,083 City of San Gabriel Community Development Director $ 9,607 $ 11,677 City of La Verne Community Development Director $ 9,540 $ 11,596 City of Rosemtlad Director of Community Development $ 8,412 $ 11,382 City of Walnut Director of Community Development $ 8,708 $ 11,111 City of Temple City Community Development Director $ 8,638 $ 10,929 City of Covina Director Community Dev/Dep Dir CRA $ 8,899 $ 10,752 City of South Pasadena Planning & Building Director $ 7,368 $ 9,873 City of Baldwin Park Community Development Manager $ 8,042 %Above/ Number of Observations 18 Market Below Variability High Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 12,181 -11.46% Labor Market Median $ 12,402 -13.47% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 15th Percentile Footnotes City of Covina -11579 longevity max (H) City of Glendora-PW Dir-11766-14694 is over Building Div 9 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Community Preservation Officer Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Temple City Community Preservation Officer $ 4,476 $ 5,664 City of Duarte Code Compliance/Animal Control Officer $ 4,428 $ 5,536 City of Monterey Park Code Enforcement Officer $ 4,324 $ 5,532 City of Diamond Bar Neighborhood Improvement Officer $ 3,888 $ 5,210 City of San Dimas Code Compliance Officer $ 4,142 $ 5,002 City of Claremont Community Improvement Officer $ 4,132 $ 4,992 City of Azusa Community Improvement Inspector $ 4,014 $ 4,831 City of Arcadia Code Services Officer $ 3,864 $ 4,826 City of Mon.rovia Neighborhood Preservation Officer $ 3,781 $ 4,826 City of Covina Neighborhood Preservation Officer $ 3,761 $ 4,572 City of San Gabriel Neighborhood Improvement Srvcs Officer $ 3,761 $ 4,572 City of Walnut Planning Technician/Code Enforcement Officer $ 3,565 $ 4,549 City of Montebello Code Enforcement Officer $ 3,510 $ 4,480 City of Rosemead Code Enforcement Officer $ 3,292 $ 4,453 City of Baldwin Park Code Enforcement Officer $ 3,206 $ 4,296 City of La Puente Code Enforcement Officer $ 3,398 $ 4,131 City of Glendora Community Preservation Officer $ 3,396 $ 4,128 City of La Verne No Comparable Class City of South Pasadena No Comparable Class %Above/ Number of Observations 16 Market Below Variability Moderate Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 4,746 16.21% Labor Market Median $ 4,699 17.04% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 1 OOth Percentile Footnotes City of Covina w 4686 longevity max (F) 10 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Deputy City Clerk Agency Comparable Class Title City of San Gabriel Deputy City Clerk City of Claremont Deputy City Clerk City of Arcadia Deputy City Clerk City of Monrovia Administrative Secretary/Deputy City Clerk City of Walnut Deputy City Clerk City of Glendora Deputy City Clerk City of South Pasadena Deputy City Clerk City of Temple City Deputy City Clerk City of Azusa Administrative Technician City of Covina Deputy City Clerk City of Rosemead Assistant to the City Clerk City of Baldwin Park Deputy City Clerk City of La Puente Deputy City Clerk City of San Dimas Departmental Asst/Deputy City Clerk City of Diamond Bar No Comparable Class City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of La Verne No Comparable Class City of Montebello No Comparable Class City of Monterey Park No Comparable Class Number of Observations 13 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina-5009 longevity max (H) City of Diamond Bar-Admin Asst-35224720 City of Azusa-Asst City Clerk-4784-5671 City of La Verne-Asst to the City Clerk-3733-4538 City of Monterey Park-Deputy City Clerk 9182-7908/elected City Clerk City of Arcadia-Repts to: 11 Minimum C.P./Max $ 4,820 $ 5,860 $ 4,542 $ 5,487 $ 4,373 $ 5,460 $ 4,053 $ 5,172 $ 4,015 $ 5,124 $ 4,136 $ 5,027 $ 4,083 $ 4,963 $ 3,896 $ 4,931 $ 4,060 $ 4,890 $ 3,828 $ 4,652 $ 3,374 $ 4,565 $ 3,327 $ 4,458 $ 3,483 $ 4,233 $ 3,216 $ 3,909 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 4,908 0.47% $ 4,963 -0.65% 46th Percentile Print Date: 5/8/2013 ' Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Executive Assistant to the City Manager Agency Comparable Class Title City of South Pasadena Executive Assistant City of San Gabriel Executive Assistant City of Monterey Park Secretary to City Manager City of Diamond Bar Executive Assistant City of Claremont Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Temple City Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Arcadia Executive Assistant City of Monrovia Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Glendora Executive Assistant City of Azusa Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Rosemead Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Baldwin Park Executive Secretary to CEO City of Walnut Executive Assistant City of La Verne Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Covina Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of La Puente Executive Assistant City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of Montebello No Comparable Class City of San Dimas No Comparable Class Number of Observations 15 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina -5000 longevity max (H) City of Montebello-Admin Sec 2948-3762; No specialized class. City of Duarte-Admin Sec 3760-4652; no specialized class. 12 Minimum C.P./Max $ 4,679 $ 6,271 $ 4,659 $ 5,663 $ 4,605 $ 5,611 $ 4,186 $ 5,610 $ 4,588 $ 5,543 $ 4,336 $ 5,486 $ 4,373 $ 5,460 $ 4,187 $ 5,443 $ 4,244 $ 5,159 $ 4,179 $ 5,128 $ 3,724 $ 5,039 $ 3,757 $ 5,035 $ 3,873 $ 4,943 $ 4,058 $ 4,933 $ 3,819 $ 4,642 $ 3,660 $ 4,449 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 5,262 4.08% $ 5,159 5.96% 67th Percentile Print Date: 5/6/2013 ! Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Maintenance Worker Agency Comparable Class Title City of Duarte Senior Maintenance Technician City of Azusa Street Maintenance Worker II City of Monterey Park Maintenance Worker City of Diamond Bar Senior Street Maintenance Worker City of Monrovia Street Maintenance Worker II City of San Gabriel Maintenance Worker II City of San Dimas Street Maintenance Worker City of Temple City Maintenance Worker City of Walnut Maintenance Worker II City of Claremont Sanitation Maintenance Worker II City of Glendora Maintenance Worker City of Arcadia Maintenance Worker City of South Pasadena Maintenance Worker II City of Baldwin Park Maintenance Worker II City of Covina Street Worker City of Rosemead Maintenance Worker City of La Puente Maintenance Worker City of La Verne Maintenance Worker II City of Montebello Maintenance Worker Number of Observations 18 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina -3758 longevity max (F) City of Monterey Park-Crew Leader 4216-5396 City of Montebello-Park/Streetrrree Maintenance Supervisor 4029-4902 City of Monrovia -Public Works/Parks Maintenance Leadworker 41 08-5243 13 Minimum C.P./Max $ 3,759 $ 4,622 $ 3,732 $ 4,490 $ 3,389 $ 4,336 $ 3,191 $ 4,276 $ 3,350 $ 4,276 $ 3,429 $ 4,167 $ 3,426 $ 4,141 $ 3,256 $ 4,119 $ 3,131 $ 3,996 $ 3,302 $ 3,989 $ 3,237 $ 3,934 $ 3,073 $ 3,836 $ 3,114 $ 3,785 $ 2,800 $ 3,752 $ 3,016 $ 3,667 $ 2,702 $ 3,655 $ 3,003 $ 3,651 $ 2,927 $ 3,558 $ 2,477 $ 3,160 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 3,961 3.85% $ 3,962 3.82% 64th Percentile Print Date: 5/8/2013 ' Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Management Analyst Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Monterey Park Principal Management Analyst City of Monrovia Management Analyst II City of Arcadia Management Analyst City of Diamond Bar Management Analyst City of Azusa Management Analyst City of Rosemead Management Analyst City of Baldwin Park Administrative Analyst City of Claremont Management Analyst City of South Pasadena Administrative Analyst City of Walnut Management Analyst City of San Gabriel Management Analyst City of Glendora Management Analyst City of Covina Management Analyst City of La Verne Management Analyst City of Montebello Management Analyst City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of La Puente No Comparable Class City of San Dimas No Comparable Class City of Temple City Management Analyst (Drift) Number of Observations 15 Variability High Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina-5561 longevity max (H) City of La Puente-Management Assistant-3751-4559 City of Monterey Park-Only management analyst level $ 6,462 $ 8,267 $ 5,396 $ 6,887 $ 5,476 $ 6,840 $ 4,508 $ 6,041 $ 4,623 $ 5,779 $ 4,214 $ 5,701 $ 4,249 $ 5,695 $ 4,681 $ 5,655 $ 4,577 $ 5,564 $ 4,322 $ 5,517 $ 4,526 $ 5,501 $ 4,454 $ 5,413 $ 4,248 $ 5,163 $ 4,163 $ 5,060 $ 4,029 $ 4,902 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 5,866 -- $ 5,655 -- 14 Print Date: 5/8/2013 i Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Office Assistant Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Monterey Park Senior Clerk Typist City of Diamond Bar Senior Office Specialist City of Walnut Office Assistant City of Monrovia Administrative Clerk II City of Claremont Office Assistant City of Temple City Office Assistant City of Duarte Clerk Typist City of Arcadia Office Assistant City of Azusa Office Specialist II City of Rosemead Office Specialist City of Glendora Office Assistant City of Covina Office Assistant II City of San DiMas Office Assistant City of La Verne Administrative Clerk II City of Baldwin Park Administrative Clerk II City of Montebello Clerk Typist City of La Puente Office Assistant City of San Gabriel City Clerk Office Assistant I City of South Pasadena No Comparable Class Number of Observations 17 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of Covina -3403 longevity max (F) City of Diamond Bar-only level City of Monrovia-Sr. Admin Clerk 3396-4334 $ 3,257 $ 4,167 $ 2,963 $ 3,970 $ 3,081 $ 3,932 $ 3,080 $ 3,931 $ 3,203 $ 3,870 $ 3,026 $ 3,828 $ 3,119 $ 3,800 $ 3,020 $ 3,771 $ 3,038 $ 3,648 $ 2,636 $ 3,566 $ 2,826 $ 3,434 $ 2,731 $ 3,320 $ 2,654 $ 3,195 $ 2,528 $ 3,073 $ 2,248 $ 3,012 $ 2,302 $ 2,937 $ 2,405 $ 2,923 $ 2,385 $ 2,895 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 3,497 8.66% $ 3,566 6.84% 71st Percentile 15 Print Date: 5/8/2013 I ' ' Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Park Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Worker I $ 3,269 $ 3,949 $ 3,237 $ 3,934 of South Pasadena Maintenance Worker II $ 3,114 $ 3,785 of Baldwin Park Maintenance Worker II $ 2,800 $ 3,752 $ 3,020 $ 3,670 of Rosemead $ 2,702 $ 3,655 of La Puente $ 3,003 $ 3,651 of La Verne $ 2,927 $ 3,558 i of Montebello $ 2,477 $ 3,160 of Arcadia of Diamond Bar of Duarte % 15 Below Moderate City of Covina-3761 longevity max (F) City of Monterey Park-Crew Leader 4218-5396 City of Diamond Bar-Park & Mtc Inspector-3965-5340 16 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Parking Control Officer Agency Comparable Class Title Citv of TemPle Citv Parkinl:l Control Officer City of Azusa Community Services Officer-Field City of La Verne Police Service Technician City of Monterey Park Community Service Officer City of Monrovia Parking Control Officer (PT) City of South Fasadena Police Assistant City of Baldwin Park Parking Enforcement Officer City of Glendora Community Services Officer City of San Gabriel Community Service Officer City of La Puente Code Enforcement Officer-Parking City of Claremont Parking Enforcement Officer City of Covina Parking Enforcement Officer City of Montebello Parking Control Officer City of Arcadia No Com parable Class City of Diamond Bar No Comparable Class City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of Rosemead No Comparable Class City of San Dimas No Comparable Class Citv of Walnut No Comparable Class Number of Observations 12 Variability Moderate Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes Cily of Covina-4C75 longevity max (H) City of Duarte -Community Services Officer PT 27 40-3377 City of La Verne-Need job description for Police Aide II and Police Services Technician City of San Dimas-Parking Enforcement Officer PT 3073-3739 17 Minimum C.P./Max $ 4,054 $ 5,129 $ 3,966 $ 4,782 $ 3,915 $ 4,759 $ 3,547 $ 4,538 $ 3,475 $ 4,434 $ 3,471 $ 4,220 $ 3,141 $ 4,209 $ 3,396 $ 4,128 $ 3,235 $ 3,927 $ 3,156 $ 3,836 $ 3,171 $ 3,831 $ 3,113 $ 3,784 $ 2,602 $ 3,321 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 4,147 19.14% $ 4,169 18.73% 1 DOth Percentile Print Date: 5/8/2013 i Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Parks & Recreation Coordinator Agency Comparable Class Title City of Glendora Recreation Supervisor City of Temple City Parks & Recreation Coordinator City of Monterey Park Program Coordinator City of Diamond Bar Community Services Coordinator City of San Dimas Recreation Coordinator City of Monrovia Recreation Coordinator City of Claremont Program Coordinator City of Duarte Recreation Coordinator City of San Gabriel Recreation Coordinator City of South Pasadena Community Services Coordinator City of Baldwin Park Program Coordinator City of Azusa Recreation Coordinator City of Arcadia Recreation Coordinator City of La Verne Recreation Coordinator City of La Puente Recreation Coordinator City of Walnut Recreation Coordinator City of Covina Recreation Coordinator City of Rosemead Recreation Coordinator City of Montebello Community_ Services Coordinator Number of Observations 18 Variability High Labor Market Mean Labor Market Median CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE Footnotes City of San Gabriel-1 Coord; Rec Supv-4696-5706-2 Supv City of Duarte -1.25 fte; Rec Supv-5107-6283 - 5 fte City of Covina-3397 longevity max (F); Recreation Srvcs Supervisor-4917-5976 City of Rosemead-5 Rec Coord; Rec Supv-4214-5701 -3 Rec Supv City of Montebello-Community Services Supervisor 4233-5147 City of South Pasadena-Community Srvcs Supervisor-3938-5277 City of La Verne-Community Srvcs Supervisor-4406-5355 City of Claremont. Human Srvcs Supervisor II-5665-6868 City of Azusa-only 1 position; 2 -Rec Supervisor-5004-6082; 1 -Rec Supt-5732-6967 City of Glendora-Only FT level City of Baldwin Park -Program Supv-3926-5264 City of Walnut-Recreation Supervisor 4154-5301 City of Arcadia -Recreation Supervisor 4839-6044 18 Minimum C.P./Max $ 4,663 $ 5,667 $ 4,412 $ 5,582 $ 4,098 $ 5,243 $ 3,793 $ 5,083 $ 4,142 $ 5,002 $ 3,752 $ 4,788 $ 3,892 $ 4,702 $ 3,699 $ 4,543 $ 3,585 $ 4,356 $ 3,521 $ 4,279 $ 3,111 $ 4,169 $ 3,316 $ 4,030 $ 3,173 $ 3,960 $ 3,241 $ 3,939 $ 3,234 $ 3,931 $ 3,020 $ 3,856 $ 3,142 $ 3,819 $ 2,636 $ 3,566 $ 2,735 $ 3,491 %Above/ Market Below Value Market $ 4,357 21.95% $ 4,224 24.33% 99th Percentile Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Parks & Recreation Director of Claremont Community & Human Services Director $ 11,486 of Diamond Bar i Services Director $ 9,935 of Glendora Community Services Director $ 10,458 of Montebello Director of Municipal Services $ 9,937 of Azusa of Recreation & Family Services of Baldwin Park i of Recreation & Comm. Svcs. of Duarte Director of Parks & Recreation $ 9,690 of San Dimas Director of Parks and Recreation $ 9,459 of Arcadia of Recreation & Comm. Svcs. $ 9,198 of Parks and Recreation $ 8,412 of Community Services $ 8,708 Recreation Director 127 I of Monterey Park $ 8,250 of La Verne of Community Services $ 8,326 of South Pasadena Services Director $ 6,999 of La Puente Class of Observations 17 Market Moderate Value Footnotes City of Covina~ 11579 longevity max (H) City of Claremont-over Community Srvcs, Human Srvcs, Building Mtc, Recreation, Parks, Solid Waste/Motor Fleet City of La Puente-Recreation Services Mgr-5707-6937 19 $ 13,876 $ 13,314 $ 13,061 $ 12,083 $ 11,909 $ 11,667 $ 11,580 $ 11,497 $ 11,486 $ 11,382 $ 11,111 11' $ 10,500 $ 10,121 $ 9,379 %Above/ Below Market Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Personnel I M<1na~Jerr1ent Analyst II 1 HLim'm Resources Analyst of Azusa of Glendora 1 HLJm'm Resources/Risk Mgmt Analyst 1 HIJm'm Resources Analyst of San Gabriel of Duarte of Baldwin Park 1 Hllm'm Resources Analyst 1 H••m'm Resources Specialist 1 HLJm'm Resources Analyst II 1 Htlm'm Resources Analyst of Claremont of Montebello of Diamond Bar of La Puente I P<,S<Jnrlel Services Coordinator IP,.rso1nnel Analyst of La Verne of Rosemead of San Dimas of South Pasadena of Walnut Comparable Class Comparable Class Comparable Class Comparable Class Comparable Class Comparable Class 11 Moderate Class City of Covina -5561 longevity max (H) City of San Dimas-HR Spec-4142-5002 City of Azusa-HR Tech-4060-4690 City of Monrovia-HR Technician 4658-5945 City of La Puente -HR/Risk Mgr-8064-9803 20 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,420 5,396 5,342 4,815 4,653 4,526 4,314 4,015 4,248 4,194 3,898 Market Value $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6,887 6,672 5,807 5,656 5,501 5,394 5,380 5,163 5,067 4,974 Below Market Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Manager of San Gabriel Division Manager of Montebello Manager of Glendora Manager of Baldwi~ Park Comparable Class Comparable Class of La Puente Comparable Class of La Verne Comparable Class of Rosemead Comparable Class of San Dimas Comparable Class of South Pasadena No Comparable Class of Walnut No Class Footnotes Data Effective December 2012 Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max $ $ 8,279 $ $ $ $ $ 6,569 $ $ % Market Value 10,933 10,763 9,835 8,969 8,815 7,985 6,828 Below City of Azusa-primarily responsible for coordinating the City's planningattivities 21 Print Date: 51812013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Recreation Leader II Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Diamond Bar Community Services Leader II $ 2,021 $ 2,709 City of San Gabriel Recreation Leader $ 1,893 $ 2,449 City of Azusa Recreation Leader $ 1,959 $ 2,383 City of Temple City Recreation Leader II $ 1,956 $ 2,289 City of San Dimas Recreation Leader $ 1,744 $ 2,122 City of Duarte Recreation Leader $ 1,771 $ 2,085 City of Covina Community Resources Assistant II $ 1,711 $ 2,080 City of South Pasadena Recreation Leader II $ 1,688 $ 2,052 City of Glendora Recreation Leader $ 1,640 $ 1,992 City of Claremont Human Services Leader $ 1,602 $ 1,936 City of Monrovia Recreation Leader II $ 1,513 $ 1,931 City of La Puente Recreation Leader $ 1,569 $ 1,907 City of La Verne Recreation Specialist II $ 1,610 $ 1,864 City of Walnut Recreation Leader II $ 1,687 $ 1,860 City of Rosemead Recreation Leader II $ 1,456 $ 1,759 City of Montebello Community Services Aide $ 1,525 $ 1,707 City of Baldwin Park Recreation Leader 1-V $ 1,387 $ 1,685 City of Arcadia No Comparable Class City of Monterey Park Recreation Leader %Above/ Number of Observations 16 Market Below Variability High Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 2,033 11.19% Labor Market Median $ 1,964 14.19% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 84th Percentile Footnotes City of Monrovia-Recreation Specialist 1960-2501 22 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Secretary Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Temple City Secretary $ 3,896 $ 4,931 City of Monrovia Administrative Secretary $ 3,847 $ 4,910 City of Azusa Administrative Secretary $ 4.060 $ 4,890 City of Monterey Park Administrative Secretary $ 3,700 $ 4,734 City of Diamond Bar Administrative Assistant $ 3,522 $ 4.720 City of Duarte Administrative Secretary $ 3,780 $ 4,652 City of San Gabriel Administrative Assistant II $ 3,726 $ 4,525 City of Baldwin Park Executive Secretary $ 3,327 $ 4,458 City of South Pasadena Administrative Secretary $ 3,611 $ 4,390 City of Rosemead Administrative Assistant $ 3,211 $ 4,345 City of San Dimas Administrative Secretary $ 3.590 $ 4,339 City of Glendora Administrative Assistant $ 3,526 $ 4,286 City of Walnut Administrative Assistant $ 3,343 $ 4,265 City of Covina Senior Administrative Technician $ 3,457 $ 4,202 City of Claremont Administrative Assistant $ 3,453 $ 4,172 City of Arcadia Administrative Assistant $ 3,335 $ 4.163 City of La Puente Administrative Secretary $ 3,398 $ 4,131 City of La Verne Administrative Secretary $ 3,246 $ 3,946 City of Montebello Secretary $ 2,668 $ 3,405 %Above/ Number of Observations 18 Market Below Variability Moderate Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 4,363 11.52% Labor Market Median $ 4,342 11.94% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 1 OOth Percentile Footnotes City of Covina ~ 4525 longevity max (H) City of Montebello-Administrative Secretary 2948-3762 23 Print Date: 5/8/2013 Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective December 2012 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY LABOR MARKET SALARY SURVEY Statistics computed using range Control Point/Max Tree Trimmer Agency Comparable Class Title Minimum C.P./Max City of Temple Ci_ty Tree Trimmer $ 3,671 $ 4,646 City of Azusa Park Maintenance Worker II $ 3,661 $ 4,405 City of Claremont Tree Trimmer II $ 3,610 $ 4,361 City of Monterey Park Maintenance Worker $ 3,389 $ 4,336 City of Monrovia Park Maintenance Worker II $ 3,350 $ 4,276 City of San Gabriel Park Maintenance Worker II $ 3,429 $ 4,167 City of San Dimas Landscape Maintenance Worker $ 3,426 $ 4,141 City of Glendora Maintenance Worker $ 3,237 $ 3,934 City of South Pasadena Maintenance Worker II $ 3,114 $ 3,785 City of Baldwin Park Maintenance Worker II $ 2,800 $ 3,752 City of Covina Park Worker $ 3,020 $ 3,670 City of Rosemead Maintenance Worker $ 2,702 $ 3,655 City of La Puente Maintenance Worker $ 3,003 $ 3,651 City of La Verne Maintenance Worker II $ 2,927 $ 3,558 City of Montebello Tree Trimmer $ 2,735 $ 3,491 City of Arcadia No Comparable Class City of Diamond Bar No Comparable Class City of Duarte No Comparable Class City of Walnut No Comparable Class %Above/ Number of Observations 14 Market Below Variability Moderate Value Market Labor Market Mean $ 3,942 15.16% Labor Market Median $ 3,860 16.93% CITY OF TEMPLE CITY SALARY PERCENTILE 1 OOth Percentile Footnotes City of Covina -3761 longevity max (F) City of Monterey Park-Crew Leader 4218-5396 24 Print Date: 5/8/2013 A endix APPENDIXB BENEFIT DATA SHEETS PageB-1 Ralph Andersen d Assoocles Ci of Temp Fe City Accountant SrmeyAgancy tmnpara6le pass a comtang. p ReL Pickup Other Lash Base+ CashDel. Dental Vision Baste Cash+ let tamp. lit RA Form, Base+ Cot+ Int+Rel Dry alNCld Accountant $6,427 $177 $6,204 $859 ono a$ 57,093 $1,193 2%4360 $8,376 CTy Vezina Accountant $5,843 $21 $113 55,777 $1,287 Mc his $7,054 $738 2%®55 $7,801 City of6apain Park Accountant $5,095 $357 $5,452 $950 me $32 $6,434 $840 21%®55 $7,274 Dry ofClremont Accountant 55,682 $114 $5,796 5914 me Inc $6,710 $1,094 2%4955 $7,004 GlyofCovina Acmurdant $5,446 $680 $10 $252 $6,081 $952 'mc Inc $7,033 5532 '%4955 $7,866 Dry of Diamond Bar SetiaAawr1ard $7,006 $560 - $7,566 $1,050 $58 ha $8,674 5814 2%®55 59,488 Data Drone Accountant $5,790 55,790 5854 $145 $25 $6,615 $495 2%4363 $7,310 City cif Glendora Accourtar2 $5,374 $5,374 5850 inc $12 $6,235 $750 56,985 City of la Puente No Comparable Class Beneft Data NolAvaila le for ma Agency City of La Verne Acountal $5,757 • $5,757 $1,307 $33 $7,096 $690'%@55 $7,968 City of Monrovia Atcourtenl ll $5945 $5,945 $400 $41 $12 $6,399 $1,375 Z71%55 $7,774 CilyafMomeoel6 Accourbof $5,075 - $5,075 $1,090 ins ho $6,165 $986 27%955 57,151 Cry ofMonterey Park Accountant $6,011 $6,011 $775 $60 $16 $6,862 $1,077 Z5%©95 57,939 City of Rosemead qty of San Dimas No Comparable Ch.'s No Comparable Class City of San Gabriel No Comparable Class Ci&Sault Pasadena No Comparable Class C. m Walnut No Comparable Class Cary of Temple Chy A4awrtanl $6,485 $6,485 $919 Inc ins $7,404 3961 Z54© $8,365 Average $5,704 $5,902 $6,582 $7,805 %+76 12,0% 9.0% 7.0% 6.7% Median $5,720 $5,793 $6,639 $7,602 %+4 11.8% 10,7% 7.6% 6.7% Cash S pplerS insurance Benefits Data Enema Dsmber2012 Retirement Benefits Meem Gait= .51'% Megan Ganhms B.m4 MedenGet, PA2 pate', 232%3 Ralph Andersen $Associates Oda Effective Osenter2012 City of Temple Cry Accounting Assistant $wyAge w rry Lampar4Meaass Range Long. Od. Al Pimp Other Cash Bases Lash Hat Osdd YGoan Cash+ Fmp.Rl Kan aweMat coma +Rat Cry orkeada till Technician II 53,960 $177 $4,137 $859 inc $30 $5,028 5777 2%@66 55.803 Cry camel &cowl eda[WO S4µ7 $21 $99 $4,557 $1287 inc 3c $5,344 5581 2x®56 $6425 Crypt Bald*? Erna Clerk 4,326 5233 $7.559 $950 he $32 54,541 5548 27%®55 $5,069 Cry &Claremont kmmagfsystnd $4,172 $83 $4,255 $914 Inc Inc $5,195 3503 2%455 $5,973 Cry d Covina cry of Diamond Bat A®nl Clerk II NsCumpartleClass $3,674 5425 $184 $4,283 $912 inc he $5,195 $606 25%1355 $5,671 Cry ofDuara No Capable Cass Cry at Glendora Na Comparable Class Cry dtaPuente Amwtig Ma's's) 4,561 Benefits Da4Nol Available for W Agenry C,rydLaVerse kccurd Clerk II $3,496 $3,496 $1,307 $33 51,837 5541 25%@35 $5,277 City ofMomwla PaaunISSpcdaful $4,280 $4,280 $400 541 $12 54,734 $990 27%®55 $5,724 Cry of Madetello A oast Chet5 53,579 $3,573 $1,090 Inc inc 54,899 5895 27%@5555 $5,364 Cy d Monterey Park &cowl Clerk 54,167 $4,167 5775 $60 $16 $5,018 $747 25%@5I 55,765 City oRosemead Qy ofSan Dines No Comparhlegas, No Comparable Class City of San Galyd Finance Clefs II 53,966 $317 $4,285 $1,340 inc Sic 45,@5 $649 27%@5; $6,474 Cry dawn Pasadena A®,m8rg Clek $3,693 $259 $3,952 $5255 575 $20 $4,672 $573 2%455 55,195 Cry ofWalnd Aarurkrq ACShad 58.39 $184 5276 $4,398 $1,050 inc Mc $5.449 5472 2%455 $5.920 Cy of Temple Cy Aanertrg Assisted (Deft) - 1 Average 4,566 $4,079 $506$ $5,742 %+3. Median 4,93$ 4,211 $5,022 $5,733 %N. Cash SunPlementr Ina utanPeBen Median Gars: Medal, GaMav Media, GeMas Pintoa@:5fl'mn Ralph Andersen!, Associates City of Temple City Aaaurd5og7etlud 5unwAgency Comparable Clan Ridge Mac Long. Def. Camp Rai Pickup Other Cash Bases Cash Dented Yalon 6aee Cash+ Ion Pmp Rat R2 Fonn Base. Cache Inie RN. fay ofkcd'a Prmur?rg Specialist $5,069 $177 $5246 5859 ha 530 $6,135 $995 2%,a $7,130 Cary of Anna AxaunnPayable 5pSa2n0 $5,125 $21 $103 $5,251 $1,207 he he $6,536 5670 2%455 $7206 City ofSa»Mn Pak Senior France Clerk $4,070 $285 $4,355 5950. an $32 55337 $671 27%®55 53008 City of Claremore &donna:nag% Assiskm $4,525 $92 $4,670 $914 inc inc $5,592 $883 2x®55 56.475 City ofCovina PayrolTedmidan $4,412 $631 $8 $221 $5,352 $952 mt be 55,301 5727 25%@55 57,031 Cy ofDiamold Bar Acmwtm9 Technician $5,083 $407 55,490 $1,020 $55 tic $6,567 $590 2%055 57,158 Cy of Ovate Accounting Specali% 55,0.2 55,022 5854 $145 $25 $5,047 $429 2fe60 $8,476 Cdy of Glendora SeSP4*.oaling Tedniidan $4159 $4259 $850 Inc $12 $5,121 $594 $5,715 CRyofLa Puente FirenceTednPcan $4,449 Benoit Data Not Amiable forth Aram CiyrfLa Verne No Comparable Class City of Monrom Annuls Tactician $4,741 $4,741 $400 $41 $12 $5,195 $1,097 27%55 $6,292 City of Montebello No Comparable Class Cy of Monterey Park PayrdlTedlniria, $5230 $5,230 $695 $50 $20 $5,995 $937 25%Q55 $6,520 Cky of Rosemead Aauun5ng Specialist 53,936 $276 14212 $1,600 he he 55,812 $403 1%p $6,14 Ciy ofSan Dares A4m,rdng Tedlridan $4,339 $434 $304 $5,077 $1,110 inc in 56,187 $442 2%65 $6,629 City of San Gabriel PayaolSpedakst $4,356 X48 54,704 $1,340 'nc to $6,044 $932 2.7%455 $6,976 12y ofSatl Paadere Acconnlira] Tednldan $4,175 $292 $4,467 $625 $75 $20 $5,187 5591 2%®55 $5,779 Clay of Wdnut No Comparable Class toy of Temple Clay Acccaritg Technician $5,576 J $5,578 $919 Inc me $5,491 5627 25455 $7,323 Average $4,590 $4,663 45361 $5,573 %el• 17.7% 123% 92% 102% Median $4,449 $4,082 $5,020 $5,553 %H. 20.2% 125% 7.7% 105% Insurance Benefits D<n TfiadnaDeamber2012 Ri5rementBenefits Son Pier OaN:9401a Ooh motive DermMt2n2 City of Temple C., AdminSfidre Services nectar Sump Meng Spirals 3,u Long. Del 7 Pickup REL D 6 34 Cmht VS IS+ Cash+ W. bp. Ret Rd -Form Bnrt Coin Lai +Re, CBpofkedia Cry Dada C2yalRabin Pat ply ofClaremirt C1ydComia Pty d Diancnb Bar Gtydlls's Cry 1Gla1[Or C4 of La Puarh CMmlaVerne Clry ofMonion Pty of Meet& Crtyof Monterey Pan GrydRosemead y /San C0nas 9.san Geoid My &Sod Pastri LNdNdvi ldministrAfse 8enux Deeds Adnnidrebae &rsiss DlooctrfCFO Fnane DGectx No0ow$arabk Cts1 Di:doroRance No Comparable Class No Cow$arahe Caas Depul'C4Y Marega7Adre Services Diretlar ark/irk-WYE Sevise No Comparable Class Administrative Send= Diade7ADA PredwofFnance DirofManagema1Senis PucmrdFmmrce Asst Cherect ofMdmm rCreasn Fwne Dreda Rance Undo Ma of Fn= $12,679 $14,393 $11,583 $11,nn; 514,694 $12,470 $14,077 512,008 $12,333 $11,104 $12,381 $12,182 $10,483 $12,325 $177 $29 $1,142 $1,238 $184 5121 $576 5811 5111 Berets $777 $857 $981 $734 0863 5278 Doh Not 512,659 314,988 $12,394 512,563 514914 Amiable 514,077 $12,083 $12,313 511,881 $14,486 $13,243.$1,310 $11,217 $13,173 51,17. $1,345 $1,200 5912 $800 for Kt $595 $1,030 $675 $1,530 $1,110 $715 $1,050 re inc inc Inc imt Agency $151 ire $50 inc Sic At $75 nc 37$30 Inc $32 Sic $12 $12 Sr 520 b5 ec Inc. 520 inc $14,059 $10344 $13,626 $13,455 $15,126 $14,836 513,173 013,278 513,481 $15,596 $14,563 $12,027 $14,425 4,459 51,861 51,910 $1,825 $2,050 53,258 $2,347 $2,210 $1,137 51,262 4622 $1,485 $1,477 %/6b %@55 27%®55 25%/55 27x/55 27%7$55 2S%@.;5 7%/55 2%®55 27%@55 2%®55 %/3 $16,548 $18126 515,536 915,280 $17,776 $19,092 $15,520 $15,468 $14,618 $16,3.58 517106 $13,511 $15,900 Virg rd Temple CAL 10drtiRSlnfrve Salim Cretmr $12,376 $12,376 $919 i' ire $13195 $1,834 2%/555 $15,129 7 Annaga $12,424 %H- 4U% 113,108 39% - $1A208 45% 515,197 -7,1% Medlin $12,330 %4i. 14% $11,656 -19% -$14,058 37% 515,500 -51% Insurance Be vs Bantus d3% N22m Geaoss -19% Meth sGerelam 0.% Pima 501513 Ralph Andersen 8 Amides 5&aReam Dater 1012 City ofTemple Ciry Associate Planner SurreyAgenry -CanpamhleClass Range ma Long, Del, comp.' Res Ruwp Other [u6 Base. Path Dental Ylslon Bmee Cash+ Ins Emp.Re1 Re1.Fam. Base Usha here Res CiyofAr6de Assodale Planner 4232 $171 $6,509 $859 irc 530 57,398 5124 7l@B9 $8,641 Cry olAzusa Associate Plarner $6232 $21 $127 $6,479 $1,287 inc inc $7,766 $828 2%455 $8,5994 Rya Baldwin Park ksocide Penner $5,672 $411 56283 5950 inc 152 $7265 $968 27%455 $8,233 Gy otC nsmonl Assockle Penner $6,468 $129 $6,597 $914 inc inc $7,511 $1245 2%455 $8,757 CdyerCovna Asso to Ranger $5,748 $477 1287 $6,512 $912 inc Inc $7,424 $948 25X455 58,372 City ofDiarrgr4 Bar Associate Planner $7,006 $560 $7,566 $1,050 $58 me $6,674 $614 2%455 $9,486 City of Duare Associate Penner $6,887 $6,887 $854 $145 $25 $7,912 $569 2%450 $9,501 fey olGlendora Associate Planner 55,926 $5,926 $820 Inc $12 $6,758 $827 $7564 Ciyol La Puente Associate Rayner Genets Data Not Available for Kss Agency City of La Verne Associate Planner $5,708 $5,708 $1,307 $33 $7,04 $883 25%455 $7,931 City ofMonrcen Associate Planer , $6,546 $6,546 $400 $41 $12 $7,000 $1,514 27%055 $8,514 CdyafMors6ello Associate Planner $6570 $6,570 $1,090 inc 'cc 57,650 $1,276 27%455 $9636 Gilt), of Monterey Park Associate Rena $7,028 $7,026 $775 $60 $16 £7,877 51,259 25%455 $9,136 Ciy, of Rosemead Plarner 55,989 $419 $6,408 $1,60 inc inc $8,008 $613 2%455 $6,821 Cry of San Dimas Assawe Planner $6,386 $639 $447 $7,474 $1,110 inc inn $6584 5551 2%655 $9,235 Ciy of SanGabnel Associate Manner 55,329 $505 $6,835 $1,340 nc inc $8,175 $1,354 27%455 $9,529 CdyofSod Pasaieru Associate Manner $5,134 1429 $6,x53 $625 375 $20 $7263 5869 2%455 $8,152 RRotWalnut Assadale Planner 55,879 $184 $412 56,475 $1,050 Sic inc $7 5 5704 24455 $8.229 CbyofTmple City Assmiate Planar $6,185 $6,485 $919 Inc Inc 51,404 $961 25%455 $8,365 Average $6,702 16,610 $7,639 $8,615 %N• 2.0% -1.6% -3.2% -10% Peden $6232 $6,54 $1,525 $8,594 x44. 2.4% .0,9% -1.6% -2.7% Cash Su lee Si 1lauanoeBenefts it Bent Mdkocah,toss 31% den ass an Re4n#:sc5l1a Ralpn Andersen &Associates Clyofiemple City BUBdingmspector Sun /germ comparable Class R Ii Ma Lmg Cap. n 379. Pidmp Omar Cash Base4 Cash Heal Dental Vision Baer Cato Enemas. RA Form. Basra Cuh4 Ret City ofk in Cambinaonlnipetwr 55,737 $177 $5,914 $859 inc $30 $6,903 $1,126 2%450 $7,929 C9y dArusa Bualirq Inspector $6211 551 5124 56,356 11287 inc inc $7,643 $012 7436 $8,455 C+y&BadwiFark Bu1daigptsp= $4,902 $349 $5,331 $950 Inc $32 $6,313 $821 254445 49,134 CJty atClameom Bolding Inspect( 55,153 $107 $5,460 $914 inc Mc $6,374 $1,031 2%455 $7,405 Cy of Caine General Budding Impeder II $5,159 $462 $250 $5,$78 1912 inc inc $6,793 ' $860 24%455 $7,641 Cly d Diamond Bar No Campa:Mee Class 4 dDuai Ne Comparable Class Cr% ofGJenOoa BuddngImpedar $5,338 59330 $860 Inc $12 $6,200 1745 M,914 City al La Puerile NOCOMpaableClass Benefits Data NM Available br tic Agencd Gay of La Veme No CanieabMClass CydMonrovia Bu3dmglnspector $5,050 $5,850 S400 $41 $12 $6074 41353 17%456 $7,657 Citycl Monlebe4o Comdinafion Boring lnspedor $4,480 $4,480 $1,920 inc inc 55,570 5870 v%455 $6,440 City alMcMereyPata Bul0Anghlspedor $5,923 $6,923 $775 $60 316 $7,774 $1,241 25%4ss $9,01$ City a1 Rosemead No Comp -made Class City ofSan Dimas B16dng MsRdm $6,052 $505 $424 $7361 $1,110 Inc inc 43,191 $617 23{455 $0,808 Cry dam Gabriel Buldll Ins b7 55,154 $402 $3,645 $1,340 Inc inc $7,986 $1,316 17%456 $9,301 Ord9lhPaadare No Compatible Clan City dWdnul No Comyaable Class City flan* C3y °dung hnpaar 55,432 $6432 $919 Inc uc $ 351 5953 25%465 $8,304 Mirage $5,651 $5,832 $5,904 $7,805 %+$ 12.6% 72% 3.1% 5.0% Median 55,737 $6170 $6,790 $7,657 %+5 10.8% 0.5% 7.5% 72% em is Data gat v^Omuta' 2712 NO4arGan/as -22% Nub GeMm .1.%5 Moan Geinlloss 02% TM Daa:5%2013 4 Ralpb Andersen dAmadates City oaTemple City Evudin90Sausing lmalu4 SureryAgnry Comparable Class Range Ma Lang, Dd. cony. Ret pomp Other coo Base, cosh Health Dena Yvon Cant la EmRRR Rat Form. Bsse Gehe Ins. a Ret. C'M of Arcadia Adding Tedineian? $4,708 $177 54,88$ $859 Inc $30 55,774 $924 2%5360 $6,698 CayofAzusa B&t g Tetrnmzn 54,890 $21 $96 $5,009 $1,287 ix Inc $6,296 $639 745355 56,935 CiydBaWvdn Park ConsmtlonGat $3,325 $233 $3,558 $950 inc $32 $4,540 $548 17%535S $5,088 City elCmmrnonl Bulmag Berra Technician $4,383 $86 $4,471 $914 me inc $5,365 $844 2455 $6,229 CityolCwina Rana Tetnicau $4,386 $443 $219 55,046 5912 ix Inc $5,960 $723 25%@55 $6,683 Gib of Diamond Bar Pat Tecvican $4,720 $378 55,098 $1,020 $58 Inc 56,175 556 2%@55 $6,724 CaulDane Comardy DecelopmerdTechradan $5,394 $5,394 $854 $145 $25 $6,415 $461 2%®6D $6,880 Chy ofGlendora Budding Technician $4,279 $4,278 $650 inc $12 $5,140 $597 $5,736 GuyanaPcente No Comparable Class Benefit Data NNAvaia le fort Ag Crtycfla Verne No Comparable Class City of Monrovia Bmldng CartrTabr0cian $4,532 $4,532 $400 $41 $12 $4,955 $1,048 17%1355 $$084 CiyofMontebello BuiFirgServizTernddan 53,21 $1,321 $1,090 inc inc $4,411 $HS 27%@55 $5,056 City of Monterey Park BiWirg Ca;k 5048 14,340 $775 $60 $16 $5,191 $778 25%@55 $5,969 City al Rasernred No CompaaNe Cass City ofBan Dimas Buddng FenatTednildan $4,553 $455 $319 $5,327 $1,110 inc Mc $6,437 $454 2455 $6,901 Croy of San Gabriel PemitTedhrican $5,609 $449 $6,058 $1,340 inc me 57,398 $1,200 27455 $6,595 City of Sout Rumrlena No ComparableClass • of Waal No Canpara5e Coss Cloy n1Temple City Buttngreaum9Assistam $4,931 J $4,931 $919 ma Inc $5,650 $3331 25%@$5 $6,580 Average $4,495 $4,717 $4701 $6,425 %el• 52% 4,1% 15% 24% Malian $4,532 $4,555 $5,774 $6,681 %44 6.1% 0,9% 1,3% 456 Cash Supplem fo Insurance BanNNts Data E,Yttnw Dsc nber2012 Retirement Benefit Medal Seams .72% 7 psi s Prig Dee 5e.20t3 Ralph Andersen d Asmdahs Dry of Temple Cloy Cry Clerk SermyAgenry compete Clan Range Ku Los Cen Com Ret Pees Caber cash Base+ Cub He h Dente Vision Base* CWI+ Int Ds. Res Rot Fax. Bain Whe sea Cary of Media No CCmpaabh Cass City alAaua No Compalaole Gass Coy of Bed%in Park No Comparable Class Cy of Clamant Cry Chrk 58,635 5173 $8,811 P14 Inc Inc 59,725 $1,601 2%45 $11,388 Gy(KCeine No Comparable Class Cdy ofliamold Bar Cry Clerk $9,193 5735 $9,928 $1,050 $58 lx $11,036 $1,068 2%45 $1Z101 Cyof plat Dyable $8084 $8084 5854 $145 $25 $9,069 $690 2%460 $9,778 Dry olGendora Dry Caere 311,041 $166 $11,210 $800 ix 512 $12,021 $1,541 $13,562 Glyolla Rena Cy Dane 59,803 Berens Dab NalAvalable forW Agency CAy al La Verne Cry Geis 58,131 $8,131 $1,307 531 $9,472 $1257 25%45 $10,723 Cry of Mamma No Comparable Cm Cry ofMtnehe8o CkyCHr 55,340 - $4340 $1,09) Inc Inc 59,,430 81$ 27%45 $11,050 Cry of Monterey Pan No Comparabe Gess Cy of Rasemead Clry Clan - $8,462 5552 59,054 $1,600 lot inc $10,654 $865 2%45 $11,521 Cry oISan Dimas CyClen $7,734 5773 5541 $9,049 $1,110 ix Inc $10,159 $788 2%4G5 $10,947 Cry of San Gabriel No Comparable Gass Cy clScut Pasadena Cypan 58,840 5619 59,4`8 $715 575 $20 $10,259 $1252 2%459 $11,521 Cts°MSS C1y Clerk $7,576 $184 5530 36290 51,050 Inc it 59,340 5908 2%458 $148 City(Clomph City ICBy Cede 54646 545461 5919 cc inc 59,5551 51282 2F%I5 310,846 Asvage 34711 $9,031 $18,120 $11,285 %N. -0.1% 4.5% 41% 48% Modhn $1,162 $8,930 $5,942 $11,219 X* 11% 4.3% 4.9% 4.4% Cash Su Ism insurance Benefit Oat Uses Oecerter2012 Retirement Ben Mnd{m GamUos 5.4% Median 0uioas 4]% IkEsn Gsmnn 05% PIS Bale sb201a Palph A devsal d Associates CityDi Temple City Bevel Me d Director Insurance Benefits Dee Eludee December 2012 . SuniAgenry ComPa2MetIass Range Mu Lc .. �L Comp. Pct,- Pithy Octet Cab. Buee Cash fkdm 0edal Vision Bute Cache he Emp.Ret P&L Form Buse Ceche Ira +Rel. Cy of Arcade ACMDeaabpmeNServices Director $14,346 $177 $14,523 51,173 inc $30 115,726 $2,817 74% $18,542 CAy of Azusa Fgenomc&Cammmily Dee Director $13,340 529 $534 $13,583 $1,346 inc Inc $15,249 $1144 7545 $16,993 City of Satin Pala Omuta Devebpmer6Managa $9,042 $661 $6605 51,00 Inc $32 55,867 $1,326 17%455 $11,153 Caycif Gannet Commmniy DsidopnemOireca $12,558 5251 $12,610 $914 bc inc $13,724 $2,418 2%455 $16,142 dtyofCovire DiectorCammurityDeviDep drCRA $10,752 $1,118 $21' 5108 $12,193 $912 inc inc 113,105 $1,773 25%455 $14,878 Gy ofDiammd Bar ComununyDevdopmenl Drector $12,989 51,039 $14,028 $1,050 $58 inc $15,135 51,508 2%455 $16,644 City of Duarte Dodo of Cammundy Development $12,555 $12,555 $854 $145 $25 $13,620 $1,077 2%460 $14,597 City of Glendora PennioRaaevebpmem Director 514,412 $216 $14,629 $800 be $12 $15,440 $',011 $17,451 City 1 La Puente Dire4Mcif Development Smicen $12,470 Eeneflts Dale NotAra0ablle for this Age0c Cie/ of LaVeme Commaky DeveI metDireea $11,595 $11,596 $1,307 $33 $12,936 11,193 25%455 $14,729 Gy of Monrovia Director oiCemmenty Developmed $14,071 $14,077 $555 $151 $12 $14,026 $3,256 2714 55 $18,092 Chi ofMontebello Director of Pemba and CD 512,083 $12,085 $1,090 Inc Sic $13,173 12,347 27%45 $15,520 Ciy el Monterey Part DirofDevelopment5onices $12,333 $12,333 $875 $50 $20 $13,275 $2,210 25%457 $15,488 City of Rosemead Director orCame* Dsv4cpmecI $11,382 $757 $12,179 61,500 Inc inc 513,779 $1,165 1x4% $14,944 Ciy cif San Dimas Asst CM forCaammuniy Development $13,620 51,352 $953 515,935 51,110 inc inc $17,045 $1,388 2%455 $18,434 City cfSen Gabriel Conunuvty Devebpmed Director $11,577 $634 $12,611 $1,340 Inc inc $13,951 62,496 27%455 $16,449 atydSouth Pasadena Flaring 6@36dmg Rector $9,873 $591 $10,554 $715 $75 $26 111,374 $1,198 2%455 $12,12 elvcfWalnut Director ofCammmityDe' %merd $11,111 $184 $718 512,073 $1,050 Inc Inc $1 123 51331 2%155 $14454 Cty&Temple Cy CorromlraDovd rimes Nectar 510,929 $10,929 3919 inc in 111,848 51,520 25 $13,467 Average $12,181 $12,149 $13,60 $15,729 %vA -11.5% •16.7% •16.8% -16,8% Medan $12,402 $12,5555 113,724 515,510 %H• -13,5% •15,5% -151% -151% Md'an GSaim - 9 • Rid On 582013 RayhAndersen 6Avcctes CHy.ofrnmple Cly Commonly Pmnm0at 0lficet Sung Ag�7 Cac-able Clam ' Range Max f -....I Aet Pkkup OS Cash Base. Cull NtlPoe Odd Yalon Cash+ Cad,. Ins. fmR al: Rd Font Base. h+Re W.t Aa, Cie/Dina Cade Sewies015er $4M26 5177 $5;066 5859 nc 530 $,68 1947 2%(367 $8839 Cy ulAans Commundylmpiovaren nspecti $4,831 81 597 $4,948 $137 ire Inc $,235 $632 2'%®5 56,867 Qy d Baldxm Pak One5doremehOSce $429'1 $301 54„57 $55 he $32 5537° 5766 27%455 56,287 City ofC2aremwd Commonly Immuttmal Mar $4,992 $100 $5,092 $914 Inc nc $6,006 $961 2%45 $6,967 Calf dConn Negnortaed Pmamain Ofnzr 54,572 $448 $229 55248 $912 it inc $6,160 $754 25%455 $6,914 City elDiamond Bat Neighborhood ImpmernerfC9ef 35210 $417 55,627 $1,020 $52 Inc $6,705 $605 2d456 57,310 On ofDuale Cale CannianoWninird Control Olma 55,53 55,59E $654 $145 $25 $6,S51 $473 2*5 7404 GydGlerdora Comm* l4esrealion Ober 54,128 $4,123 $850 Inc $12 $4,990 $575 $5,566 City of La Puente Cade 5reonvAtOfnw $4,131 Peeks DMA NAArahatie for this Agerq Qy alts Veme No Comparable Chss Cdyof Mania N9ghSwMcdReeva nOffiw $4,826 54,825 $460 $41 $12 55,290 51015 27%455 $6,396 city ofModena Code EtceTadO0t $4,160 $4.480 $1,093 Inc Inc $5,570 $670 27%®x3 *440 City of Monterey Pan Code Enforcement Mar $5,532 $5,532 5775 580 $16 $,383 $991 25%05 $7,374 CCynRosenead Code Erdanl0fiw $4,453 $312 $4765 $1,600 it Inc 51,365 5456 2%455 $6,824 Ay &San Dings Code Comptihe0moa $5,02 $500 $350 55,652 $1.110 inc i 55,962 5510 2%45 $7,472 city dSan Gabriel 9y ofSae Pasadena Neig erhoedMpuemeol9n ..QLer ybComyeradeOn $4,572 $366 $4,318 $1,340 in $5,273 $973 2754455 574'5 City of Walnut PewixTdeo®NLode EnlmgmatOfcer $4,919 1194 $316 55352 51.050 Inc ' $4102 5545 2%45 56,647 Ciyo(Tenon CBy Camara! Preset( Muir $,664 53654. 819 Or Inc 55,5631 $340 25%63.5 $7,422. Avenge $(746 $5,042 75,071 $6,13 %14- 112% 11,0% 76% 12%. Median $4,695 55,003 55,160 5$a67 %N. 173% 11.7% 6.4% 7.5% Cash Su Oaa50edleDnember2712 Meth%Gattti S.1% 10 %dmSaiMmc S]% a%9n Ge6Mass 1.1% %0110000.510.12003 Ralph Andersen S Associates Clay of Temple dry DenutvCtyClerk SurwyAgwry CompandeCh¢s Range Nu Long. M. caw. Pet Fah Other Lash Baze+ Cash Health Dental Yaks Base+ C. Ins- Emp.Ret pet Form, B e+ Cash+ 11.44 RA City:Omaha Deputy City perk 55,460 $171 $5,637 $84 he $30 $5,525 $1,072 74450 $7,47 Cly eking 4dminiwahreTedmldan $4,890 $21 $58 $5,009 $1,287 irk inc $6,295 $560 2%453 $5,5.15 Gyd Bak.Bn Park Deputy City Clerk $4,458 $312 $4,770 5950 Mk $32 $5,74 $735 07765 $5,487 CiydClaemort Depuy City Clerk $5,487 $110 55,597 $514 inc Inc 6,511 $1,055 2%455 $7,567 CiydCavie DepuyCay CMrk- $4,652 $545 99. $233 $5,517 544 ho Inc $5,579 1767 05%48 $7,346 CMo$Diamond Bar No Comparable Class CM ofDurk No Comparable Chas City of Glendora Deputy DM Clerk 55,027 $5,027 $820 inc $12 $5,959 $701 $6,580 City ofLa Puente Deputy City Cork $433 Benefits Dale Not Avala le fort' Agency i Clay of la Verne No Comparable Class CrtyoiNomniie AdrinaareSea!lery4Depery CdyClerk $5,171 $5,172 $400 $41 512 $5,626 $1,19817%®8 $5,822 Gly of Modehella No Comparable Class City of Monterey Park No Comparable Cass City of Rosemead Asslelani Is the Coy Clerk $4,555 $320 $4,885 51,970 he no $5,485 $467 2%®55 56,552 CilyoSian Dimas DepaNnentalAsbteputy ChyPerk $3,909 $391 $274 $4.574 $1,110 he inc $5,554 $398 2%455 $5,082 ClyafSan Gabriel Deputy ClyClerk $5,860 $469 $5,329 $1,340 me inc $7,558 $1254 27%455 $8,822 C71yofSouh Pasadena Deputy City Clerk $4,963 $347 $5,310 $625 $75 $20 $6,030 $709 2%48 $6,733 City alWahn Deod, Coy Clerk $5.124 $184 9'.59 $5667 $1,050 Inc he $5,717 $514 2%455 $7,331 Ciy o TempleC4y Deputy Coy Clerk $4,931 14,931 $915 inc he $5,850 $731125%48 $5,580 Average $4,906 $5,300 $4311 $7,111 %+4 05% -7.5% -7.9% 4.1% Median $4,963 $5,241 $6,390 $6,943 % 41% +6 4.6% 4.3% -91% -5.5% Cash Su km insurance Benefits Datl Efiedhe December 2G12 Retirement Eenefi6 MS'anGaiatms 4. 71 Prinhale:5=13 Ralph Adcrsen 5 Associates City n57E4033 C'Oy EicattiveAssistant to the City Mann sr SprsgA9mry ComparableClass Rath Range Mu Em4 M. Comp. Mel. Piclvp Other Cash Bases Cash NMI Ilion 9ase♦ Cash+ Ins. ____.. . . hoc.. Ret _ Res Fan Base 1. Cash. Ins4Rel. CidArcadia Eea3@ra Assisted $5,483 $177 $5,637 5659 Inc $30 56,52E $1,072 2%{10-0 57,597 Cdy dA2usa Flack Assistant to Manage $5,126 521 $103 $5,251 51237 inc he 56,539 $670 2%065 72x9 ofBadin Pack Eea the SrmSaryto CEO $4035 $352 $5,387 $950 Inc $32 56,370 $B30 27%055 7200 Gty ofCblanaN EQmSre AsAanlh he ChyM3rages 55,543 $111 $5,654 $514 he ix 56568 $1,067 214.9 $7,595 of Covina Eec¢nePsss[alt to he Cdy Manager $4,642 35676 $952 lit Inc PAP $765 25%055 $7,333 egg ofDiamord Bar ty of Diets EmafiMMAssishm No Comparable Class $5,610 $449 $4059 51,020 $58 inc $7,137 5651 2%055 $7,768 of Glendora EveadveASSMant 55,159 55,159 $650 Inc $12 56,021 5720 56,740 tyof LaPuek Erewfi2Ass61arrt $4,449 Bereft Data Notkada le for Ni!%enq City diaVerge E7sa0ve Assit%toMe Gig, Manager $4,933 $4,933 $1,387 $33 56273 $763 25%055 $7,035 of Mmwra ExeculneAssntanttolhe Coy Manager $5,443 $5,443 $400 $41 $12 $5,697 $1259 27%055 $7,1% CAf dMortebelo Na Comparable Class City of Monterey Falk Seratryto Cdy Manages 55,611 55,611 5695 $50 520 $6,376 $1,005 25%053 $7,361 of Rosemead ay /San Dlmas Esmdvn Assisbd to he Cdy Manager No Comparable Cbss $5,039 5353 .x,392 51,600 ix inc $4W2 5516 2%055 7,50B &San Gabriel Ea culleAsistant 5,663 $453 $6,116 $1,340 inc inc $7,456 $1,211 27%0SS $8,667 d5mdh Pesafsra Enable An'sbd $5,271 $439 $6,710 $715 $75 $20 $7¢0 $889 2%855 56,406 war En eAssitri $4,943 $184 $346 $5,473 51054 in: Inc $6,43 $692 2%04 7,116 CdydTem*CEy EE'ufneAssislar%m Be Gy Manager $4486 55,466 $919 inc S 54905 5613 25%055 7,218 Average $5262 $5,603 SG125 PAN %t1- 4.1% -21% 15% 17% Median $3,159 $5,542 56,532 $7,357 %N• to% .1,0% -20% -1.9% Cash SuppteJnrs Ins Dab E0e&e Decanter2012 Mahn GeMosx -7a% 12 Medan Garbs -1.0% Meafm$emtcsn 2,1% Rmtbae58N2013 Ralph Andersen & Assodates City 41Temple City Maintenance Worker sormyAgog Comparable Class Rang • May. fig' 00d, Ral. Pkgp Mier Cash B[ahase+ Health Dental Velon Base+ Cash+ it. Emµ Rel. Rel Fat Reset Cash+ @s+Rea City clArcadia Maintenance Water $3,535 $177 $4,013 $915 inc $30 $4,958 $753 2%@66 $5,711 GydAzusa Shen Maininenance Workr II $4,490 $21 $97 $4,601 $1,287 Inc inc $5,588 $587 2%4055 56,475 Crty alBald+.in Park Maidenance Worker II $3,752 $263 $4,015 $616 532 $34 $4,599 $519 27%@53 55,317 City of Claremont Sankanon MahnennnceWorker II $3,989 $3,589 $314 me inn $4,983 $755 2%4055 $5,571 ay clCovina SheeIWaka 53,667 $425 $183 $4,275 $912 ac inc $5,187 $906 15%@53 $5392 Cny of Diamond Bar 5oninr Sheet Maintenance Woder $4,276 $342 4,618 $1,020 $58 Inc $5,696 497 14@55 $5,192 City of Duarte Senior Maintenance Tactician $4,522 54,622 $854 $145 $25 55,647 $395 24@60 $6,042 CiyufSenAera MainhrranoWorker x,934 $3,931 $850 inc $12 4,796 $549 $5,345 Gay of la Puente Mallet= Woriner $3,651 Bends Data*IAea0a le forth' Agency City al La Verne Maktmarce Water II 53,558 $3,558 $1,307 533 4,898 $550 25%4035 $5,449 Gyol Monrovia Sheet Maintenance Warier II $4,276 $4,375 400 541 $12 54,730 1989 27%@55 $5,719 City ofMonlehello Maintenance Worker $3,160 $3,150 $1,090 Inc Inc $4,250 $514 27%@53 $4,864 CM/ lMonterey Pak Maintenance Vault 4,336 4,336 $775 $60 $16 $5,167 $777 2.5%@53 $5,964 City of Rosemead Malnleren® Worker 53,555 5255 $3,911 51,600 inc Inc $5,511 $374 27@55 $5,665 City ofSan Dimas Sheet Maintenance WMer $4,141 $414 $290 $4,845 $1,110 inc inc $5,555 $422 2%@i5 $6,377 CiyafSen Gabriel Maintrers Worker II $4,157 $333 $4,500 51,340 ire inc $5,840 $691 27%@55 $6,732 CiyatSouth Pasaaera Maintenance Worked $3,785 $285 $4,050 5625 $75 $20 $4,770 $536 2%4053 $5,376 CtynlWalni, Maintenance Worker II $3,566 $184 $260 $4460 $1,050 inc inc $5,510 5479 2%@55 $5,969 Ca al Temple Gay MainenanceW%kr $4,1191 $4,119 $919 ac inc $5,038 5611 2.5%@55 $5008 Average $3,961 4,186 $5,201 15,513 %+I- 3.1% -1.6% 4.3% 2g% Median $3,567 $4,275 $5,167 $5,792 %+1- 35% 42% 4.0% -23% Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits Oath EattbwDee ber2012 RetlrementBenefts Malian C Mss -7a 12 �ca�5ma s Pmt Date' 5612010 Ralph Anderen 8 Assocaen City of !ample City ManagementAnayst Suney Agemty Campania Class Range map Imt tang Dd. Comp. Rd, Prep Other Base. Cub HmTh rend Maim Bra. Cam. Emp. Rut Belton. Bak. Cash. x G Nradla yc1 Managewnrdk sl $6,840 $177 $7,017 $1,173 pc $30 $82 20 $1,343 2 %460 $9,.52 Gty of Azusa ManagementNalyst $5,779 $29 $121 $116 $8445 $1,257 inc inc $7,332 $755 2%455 $8,067 City d Baldwin ?Irk Pdnunimalha Andy $5,645 5359 56,654 $950 inc $32 $7,076 $939 27%45 $8,015 Cey6Ckremod MaraaememMayst 55,655 $113 $5,756 $914 inc sic $6,662 $1,089 7%6DjS $7,771 Gty of Codna MenagenelArebt $5,163 $689 5114 $258 $6213 5952 Vic inc $7,165 5851 25%@55 58,016 ClydGamad Bar ManacemsikWfsi $5,011 0483 56,44 51,050 $58 inc 57,532 5702 7%455 $6,134 CM., 440121e No Comparable Class CUy dGlendora Man ementMayst $5,413 $5,413 $820 inc $12 $5,245 5755 $7,000 City efts Reis No Comparable Class B netDatallotAvaVa lefor his Pgenm Qty of LaVerna ManagementMayl $5,060 $5,660 $1,337 $33 56,401 $782 25%45 $7,183 IRy al Monrovia MaragenentMayst 11 $6,837 54887 $400 $41 $12 $7,311 $1,653 27%46 $4934 C4yofMontalello Mana98mgdkelysl $4,902 54,902 $1,080 inc inc 35,652 $952 27%455 S6,9µ GMof%lmary?ark Principal Manag:memAayst 58767 $4257 $790 $50 320 $9,137 51,481 25%45 $10,618 City cRosemead MaragemelAnalyst $5,701 6399 56,100 $1,600 inc inc $7,700 $584 2%@S $6264 City d San Dimas No Comparable Gass eh dSan Gabriel ManagemaryMntyst $5,501 5440 55,941 51,340 inc inc $7,281 $1,177 27*5 .65,458 CRydSouth Pasadena Administrative Analyst $5,S4 $389 55,953 5625 575 320 .5,673 $766 2%45 $7,461 CO dWdrud Manayemerematot $5,517 $184 $366 5.087 51.050 c is 57,157 5651 7%45 $7,798 City dimple GM Manacertent ysllDiilq 1 Average $5,666 $6,151 $7,181 56,164 % 44. Mellen $5,655 $,067 $7,165 54016 %H- Cash5 oaken - is insurance Data 95edhe Deme te2➢12 MSSSnGanutme 14 Made Gantme MedenGsates PelDer.5V2e13 Ralph AMersen &Associates City cif Temple Cly Orme Assistant Sung Agency Comparable Gas Range Mu long. Al. ContP. Res PleAu P Other Cab Bases Cash Heat Dental Valor Bases Cash+ Ms En�p.Rec Ret Fans Bose. Cash+ ma Re. Coy o1Na¢da Moe Aslskd 53,771 $177 53,948 $859 inc $30 54,837 $740 2%®W 15,577 CodAnsa 018ce Speda0st II $3,648 $21 $73 $3,742 $1,287 inc inc $5,029 $477 2%®55 55,506 CByal Badv4n Park Adninvsealive Clerk II $3,012 $211 $3,13 5950 me $32 $4,205 5497 27%655 $4,702 I"ofCWemp% Office Assistant 53,870 $77 $3,947 $914 Inc he $4,861 1745 AP 55,697 Cava Covina Zoe Assistant II $3,320 $416 5166 -$3,902 $912 inc Inc $4,814 $547 25%6955 $5,352 Cityc1Damond Bar Senior Once Spedcat $3,970 5319 $4,288 $1,020 $58 inc 15,365 $461 2%®55 $5,826 GtyolDuara Clerk Typist 53,600 53,800 $854 $145 $25 $4,825 $325 2%4950 $5,150 Cat of Glendora ORDAulsard $3,434 13,134 1850 nc $12 $4,296 $476 $4,775 City of W Peeroe Ofice Assistant $2,923 Benefits Data NotAvdlable tor this Agency City alaVeme Adnrmistraeae Clerk!' $3,073 13,073 $1,307 $33 54,413 $479 25%0M $4,888 gof Monrovia MmnimaliveCerk ll $3,931 $3,931 $400 $41 $12 $4,365 $50.9 27%®55 $5,294 Ciy d Mont:telll ClakTyfis 52,937 $2,9'75 $1,090 Inc Inc $4,027 5570 27%@55 $4,597 CGy dMomeeyPark Senior Clerk TypIst $4,167 $4,167 $775 $60 516 $5,019 5747 25%8.$5 $5,785 Gaye( Rosemead Oltce Specialat 53,565 5253 $3,816 11,660 Inc Inc $5,416 $365 24455 $5,751 Cry ofSan Dorris OGceAsisant 33,195 $320 $224 $3,736 $1,110 Inc ix $4,845 $326 2%6950 $5,174 CIA San Gabriel ray Clerk OMeAssistard I $2,895 5232 $3,127 $1,340 inc it 56467 $E19 27%©55 $5,086 Ciy61Smith Pasadena No Comparable Class Cit aWalnd Office Assistant 53,932 $104 $275 54,391 51,050 inc inc $5,441 $471 2%®55 55,912 CdydTemple City Offce Asssta% $3,828 j $3,828 5919 Inc inc $4,7471 $557 25%®55 $5,314 Average $3,497 $3,716 $4,765 $5,313 % ii. 6.7% 2.9% -OA% 0.0% Medan 13,566 53,508 $4,851 15,328 %+A 6.8% 0.5% 4.8% 43% 115 km4nts InsuranceBenefit DalaEffete December 2032 Retirement Bona MeflanGatMo 53% 15 Mein GalJloss -23% Pdntlble5%20l5 Palpl Aitrsta i Aswei>; CayTanya Ci% Park Maaanance Worker 9aayAgerap Ceara*Caa kings Camp. Pk$ tab Cash HvaYh Omtlal Van Baer Cater Ems, Pal. RtFam. Baer Cabr CaDiktat Gty of Anira COy d Bala Park Clq ofChiaaM ClydCana Gy dDiamord Bar Cy d Nara Cy of Goan CEyaaPeas tar 0112 Vane CCy&Mana cas dMonabelo GyaMamary Pak ChdRowrro Biy&San DMat by at San Gaiel Gliy dSdbPaalaa SW dWdoi No Comparable Cass Pak Mainenvlce Wake 4 MaintermneWort II GitsalaksperII PasWoker No Comparable Class No Comparable Class Mateo= Wader Ma6erancsWalar 'Satiate Wafer L Park Wawa Water II Mdrknance Wat Mananance Worker Ma1knanceMasa Lardsepe Mananance Wake Pak klknansrceWerr II Marmon War II Wawa Wake II $1,4(5 $3,752 $3,945 3,670 $1,934 $3,501 53,558 $4,275 25,160 54,336 $3,655 $4,141 $4,167 $3,725 50,596 41 -' $425 $414 $164 $86 $263 $79 $194 Bevels $256 $290 $333 $255 $280 Data Nat 34,514 $4,015 $4,028 $4,279 53,934 Available 53,558 $4,276 $3,160 $4,256 $3,911 $121511,110 $4,500 $4,553 54.460 $1,257 $618 $914 $912 $850 540' 51,127 l433 $1,090 $775 57.600 $1,340 $17525 51,050 Inc $32 Inc ha iC Agency $33 $41 Inc $60 is ac ac $75 Inc ice $34 ac it $12 512 me $16 inc irc it 520 is $5,801 54,509 $4,942 $5,191 $4,796 $4,896 54,730 542500 35,187 $5,511 $5,255 $5,40 $4370 $510 5576 $619 5750 5605 $519 1550 $969 $614 $777 $374 $422 $691 $936 $479 2%,133 2.7%71155 21455 25%%65 2344,155 27%455 171455 2.%@55 7%,1.55 21,1'3 7.7%@55 2%55 2%,155 $6,,277 $5,317 $5,702 $5,796 $5,345 $5,449 $5,719 $4,664 $5,984 $5,665 $$6,377 5$,732 $5,3(6 $5689 r-ofTeale CTy Pas Mantuan Water I 54,1191 $4,119] 5919 icc me $5,022 $611 25%@3e $5,642 Annie %r! $3,196 SA% $1,133 -0,3% $5,119 22% $5;773 -22% Medan %N• $3,934 4911 $4,163 -1.1% 15,054 -0S% $5,751 -1,9% OitatedieDa rter=DII 11 b, GuMms 01.9% Media Gahta, 0.5% WedfarGtlaaa -14% RMpak$61013 4 Ralph Andersen &Asociates City of Temple City Parkin Control Officer Survey Agency Comparable Class RangMac° LO4' Comfit pidMp cash cash HS01 Dental Vision Base. Cash., Ins, Emp Pet RM. Form. Ease., Cache ha+Res City dArcadia No Comparable Class City of Azusa CorrammitySefdres Ofacer-Feld $4,792 $21 $95 $4,898 $1287 inc me $6,185 $525 7,6®55 56,811 City of6aldvin Park Patting PmMapflOfcer $4209 $295 54,504 $950 inc Sat $5,486 $594 2.7%055 $6,180 GyofClaremont Parking frdacementOficer $3,831 $77 $3,909 $914 inc me $4,822 $739 2%%055 $5,559 CiydCarina PMtlrg Enforcement Officer $3,784 5428 5189 $4,401 $912 inc inc $5,313 $624 25%955 $5,937 Divot Dismal Bar NoComparable Class Chi arDuank No Comparable Class C4of GloMoa Community Ser iom Officer $4,129 $4,126 $850 Inc $12 $4,990 $576 $5,565 Ciy of La Puente Code Edorcemnnl Officer- Parting $3,936 Seriatim Data NotAvalla ktar msAge City ofaVerse Poke Santa Teduticvn $4,759 $4,759 $1,307 $33 $5,099 $736 26%055 $5,835 City ofMonrona Parking Control Officer (PI) $4,434 $4,434 $400 $41 $12 $4,699 11,026 17%055 $5,913 City of Montebello Panting Control Officer $3,321 $3,321 $1,I0 Inc $4,411 5645 27%055 $5,058 Qty of Monterey Park CommunCySaMce Officer $4,538 $4,538 $775 $60 $16 $5,385 $813 25%055 $6,202 City of Rosemead No Comparable Gas City al San Limas No Comparable Class City (gar Gabriel CommuniySeMe Officer $3,927 5314 $4241 $1,340 inc Inc $5,581 $840 27%@55 $6,421 City ISM) Pasadena PoliceAssissanl $4,220 $295 $4,515 $625 $75 $20 $5,235 $598 2%055 $5,637 CO of Walnut No Comoarable Class Ctyof Temple CM Parting Cored OMcr $5,129 $5,129 $919 inc inc 55.046 1760 25%055 I $5,808 Average $4,147 $4,132 $5,309 $5,026 %e7- 19.1% 155% 12.2% 11.4% Median $4,169 $4,434 $5,313 $5,937 %eb 110 13.6% 121% 12.9% CahS pPlem Insurance Benefits CaaEfete0ecember2012 RetirementBenefts Median Genhoss 52% 17 MdimGeh4m -Lt% McEmGai.7ms a Finn On In: a'HRm3 Ralph AMesm BAssoSats C5y of Temple City Panics & Recntalion i;wrdinator Survey Agency Comparable Cass Ranp Max Long. Del. Co* Plel. c Other Cub Cash Berea Nsson Cant tr . Emp. Rd. Rd. Form. Cash« I s«Ret Cry of Arca6ra Raaeafim Coordinator $3,960 $177 54,137 $659 ire 520 55,026 5777 2%0960 $5,393 CyofAmsa RmealrCoordinatr 54,030 521 $81 $4,131 $1,287 Nc Nc 55,418 9527 2%0951 $5,945 City ofBitlxin NM Pmgrmn Umtata $4,159 $292 $4,461 $950 No $31 $5,41: 5687 27%@,55 $6,130 Di of Claremont Program Coordinator $4,702 $94 $4,796 $914 Nc inc 55,710 5.005 2%@55 56,915 Cy ofC4nNa Rmeaion Cwrtllnnor 53,619 5429 $191 54,479 $912 9c inc $5,351 $630 25%855 55,980 Cara crOiarrol Ba CwmmiySenicss CooNinamr 55,083 $407 $5,490 $1,020 $56 inc 55,567 $590 2%®55 $7,158 Ciy al Dane R=1768 Cwrdnalw $4,543 $4,542 $854 $145 $25 $5,558 $389 2%®67 $5,955 C,y aGNora Reae.on Supenisa $5,667 55,667 $820 Nc $12 53,499 $791 $7459 CNyolLa Rent Recrean Combat, 53,931 Bem% Dab Not AvaibSifar tit Agency C4 of La Vane Reoez6onCooanate 53,939 53,939 51,397 $33 $5,279 $609 25%®5s $5,669 Cry ofMonmia Reoea6on Cwldnato $4,758 $4,788 $100 $41 $12 $5212 $1,108 27%155 $6,345 pry of Morotof Montetel3 Comnunuy Serkes Cw*0809 53,491 53,491 $1,090 Inc inc $4,581 $676 27%®55 $5459 Coy ofMomerey Park Program Cowdinalw $5,243 $5,243 $775 $60 $16 $6,094 $939 26%®55 $75333 Coy ofRcsemead ReoeatoCwMnalw $3,566 $250 $3,615 $1,600 Inc Sic $5,416 $365 2%@,55 $5,791 C8y&San Dimas Reoea0on Coonifirralor 5$[02 $500 $350 55,652 51,110 Inc Inc $6,982 5510 2%®55 57,472 44 of SanGahrid .ReaealonCoorlNamr 51,355 $348 54,704 51,340 Nc inc 96444 $932 2A455 SG 975 illy a South PaSera Comity Services Coorth>ma $4,279 $300 $4,579 $525 $75 520 $5499 $665 2%@,55 55,905 •., o1Wa W RemeabmrCwn&Nalw $3,856 $194 $270 $4310 $1.050 me It 65350 $462 2%0955 $5,622 aayafTemple City Parks 6Reaeamn Combat" 55,592 $5,582 $919 inc na. $4501 5827 25%0955 57,322 Average $4,357 54,111 $5,539 $6,316 %+I• 21,9% 173% 1334 13.8% Midlan $4,224 $4,543 $5,419 $5,910 %H- 24,3% 11.6% 166% 11,% Cash Supplen yts Insurance Bends Data EAedeDemmh2012 Retie Ben Mem Gamicss .57% 19 Meter Gtmtass .20% Ikth,G&ALm 1.]% Fmine25S0C13 Dam Effective Deennder2012 Ciyofiempk City Pala & Recreation Director 5urmyAgency CompnbleClam Ranee Lora. C P Pc�Wp Other Luh Hot Ducal Vision Baser Cash* Ins, Emp. Rat list Form Cash+ Base+ as.+Ret Crty of Arcadia DlrermrofRmeation&CommSya. $11,486 5177 511,663 $1,173 inc $30 $12,865 52,255 A4@60 $15,121 Crtyo/zna DlredorofRandom & Family Services $11,939 $29 $475 $12,415 $1,346 inc inc $13,761 $1,557 2%@55 $15,317 GryrdBalSnn Pate Direct( of Recreation& Comm. Svcs. $11,667 $617 - $12,484 $1,200 inc $32 513,716 $1$23 27%@55 $15,39 C4yofClaremont Camnmiy& Human SeMces Direaor $13,876 $278 $14,154 $914 inc inc $15,058 52672 2%@55 $17,739 C0yaf&Fiala D9eQorofParks 8 Recreation 510,752 $1,118 5215 5108 - $12,193 $912 Inc Inc $13,105 $1,773 25%@55 $14,878 COy al Diamond Bar Commonly Serino Director 513,314 51.055 $14,379 $1,050 $58 Inc $15,487 $1,546 2%®s5 $17,033 Cdy of Duarte Director of Pads&Recreation $11,580 511,580 $854 $145 $25 $12,605 . 1990 1%@60 $13,595 City ofGlendora CommuntlySerdces Decor 513,061 $195 $13,257 $800 inc $12 $14,03 $1,821 $15,591 Cl/ Wta Puente Na Caryarao@Uss Bent: Dais NlArlla kfir0[ Agency Ciyofla Verne Near ofComma* Services $10,121 $10,121 $1,307 533 $11,461 51,565 1.5%@55 $13,026 Cigar Monrovia Director alCommuriySmrss $14,077 514,077 $400 541 $12 $14,531 $3.255 27%@55 $17,785 GyatMontebello Di:dmofMunicipal S&Mons $12,33 112,083 $1,090 inc inc $13,173 $2,347 277@55 $15,520 Cdy of Monterey Pate DeorReaeafm $10,500 $10,500 $875 550 $20 $11,445 $1,181 25%@55 $13,326 C¢yl Rosemead Director ofPais and Reaea$on 511,33 5797 $12,179 $1,603 inc inc $13,779 $1,155 2%@55 $14,944 CiyofSan Dimas Director ofParks and Reaex$on 511,497 $1,150 5805 $13,451 $1,110 inc Inc 514,561 $1,172 25,@35 $15,733 City elSan Gabriel Path leRecrea6on D'VeMr $11,052 $887 $11,979 $1,340 inc Mc $13,219 $2,373 27%@55 $15,552 City of South Pasadena CamruriySerm Director $9,379 5857 $10,035 $715 $75 $20 110,046 $1,328 2%@$5 $12,174 City °M elan Dirermro$Cammunity Services $11,111 $184 $778 $12,073 $1,050 inc inc $13,123 $1,331 2%@55 $14,454 CByofTemple Day Para 8 Recreation Dee]a $10,9291 $10,929 $919 inc Inc $11,848 $1,30 15%@55 $13,467 Average $11,699 $12,272 513,348 $15,169 %+I- -7.0% 42.2% •12.7% •128% Median $11,497 $12,179 $13,319 $15,317 541• •5.2% 4114% •12.4% •13.7% Cash S ppkm nfs Insurance Benefits - Retirement Benefits MedianWclwss -62% 19 64dim Gaicss -1.e% MaEMG¢N1 • POE Dale: 550015 RalphMder$n &Assodares Ciyo(TempleCity PersaanelAnalyst Buret AP tampnale Class- Range Ma Lon4 ThawCasM1 Other BCashh HWth Oeblal Ymon Cash+ ^ Erp.Ret - R4 Bonn Baer Cab InS,611 C6yofArca Human Resmrsee $u alyat 36,62 $177 $6,949 $1,173 Inc 530 $$8,04 51,310 2%@W $99,761 CLolNnssa Human RssouesRckMgmtAnatysl $5,907 $21 5116 $5,944 $1,387 nc me $7,231 $759 2%@5 $7,990 Clry ofBaMain Pah Human Resmrees Malyslll $5,790 5377 55,757 595 inc $32 $6,729 $697 27%405 $7,676 ay of Claremont PasormS Sakes Cmdmamr 55,067 5101 55,166 $914 inc inc $6,052 $973 2%@5 $7,056 Cy ofCeo Nman Rescuces Perabs1 55,162 $689 $1 5253 56,213 $952 atc inc 57,165 $951 251,@5 $8,016 Cy of Diamond Bar No ComparableClass C1y of Deane Homen Rasmus Spedalls' $5,394 $5,394 $554 $145 $25 $6,419 1461 2%@W $6980 Cy of Glendora Human Resmnas kraysl $5,556 55,655 $820 ine 312 $8486 $765 $7,277 ay o1La Pucote No CcmpamWe CMss Bane Data Nat Avadablz fortis Agency Ciy of La Verne No Comparable Class GyetMonrovia MarmgemerlMayt111 $6,887 S6,B87 $400 $11 $12 $7,341 $1,.593 27%@5 $6,934 CityatMordehalo Peromd A aiyst $4,974 $4,974 $1,630 inc irc $6,064 $966 27%@5 57,630 Ciry of Monterey ?ark Hvian Resoures Mayst 56,934 .5;,934 $695 $50 520 $7,699 $1,243 255@35 58,942 Gy of Rosemead No Comparable Class Dry of San Dimas No Comparable CMss GyofSanGabril Hunan ResumesArmyst $6,501 $440 $5,941 $1,340 inc he $7,291 51,171 27%@35 56,458 Fey of South Pasadena No Comparable Gass G'NofWalmd Nit CombarabMCtss CItyofTempleCy Personnel Areryst $7,752 57,7 $919 Inc me 58,571 $1,149 offiregrez ,60 Average $5,767 $5,17 $5969 $7,951 %eF 256% 229% 19.7% 16.9% Nei in $5,501 $5,941 57,1 $7,990 %N• 26.0% 73.4% 17.4% 16. M Data E4ecctve Decemder212 Raw gagers 47% Memaartim eo% Mee'n,,Gagna 12% Nate -52/1213 Ralph Andersen S Aswdaies City crimple City Planning Manager &reT/kt°q CompanNe Clio Ril9e Conc. Ret Pelt' P Other fish [aim Health Dental Vision B Af Cash+ Ins. Esp. Rd Rot Form Plea Cash+ tr¢+Rat City&Amite 510,933 5177 511,110 51,173 inc $30 $12,313 52,146 2%4060 514,459 CaaumaulyDerehpma0Admiisthr CdyciAzusa Asst Dicf Econonic5CommunoyDev $9,,456 5255 $1 •5169 56,805 $1267 Inc he $11,082 51,237 7%4055 512,330 Ciry&Baldwin Pak No Corporal* Class Gryo0Clarenont City Plano 59,635 5197 510,32 $914 inc inc 510,946 $1,994 NIP $12,639 CON dCoNina No Comparable Class Qty ofDiamond Bar Plying Manager 56,969 5719 $9,667 £1,050 558 Inc 510,794 $1,042 7%g555 $11,936 GrydDuane Qty Planner $55,717 59,717 $554 $145 $25 510,742 $831 2%4062 $11,573 C7yotGlendora Phnring Meager $6,826 $6,826 5620 inc $12 $7,660 5953 56,612 Ciyd La Puenle No Comparable Class BenoSt Dala NaAaailabd for ORAgeray Ciyd La Vane N2 Camparahle Cbss GyalMancha Plarnirg Division Manager 510,763 $10,753 5991 $41 512 511,207 $2,490 2.7%4055 413,697 CSydMmdebe0o Flaming Manager $7,985 $7,985 $1 ran tic hr 59,75 51,551 27%4055 $10,626 C,ryalMolereyPark PlzndngMano9er 510,955 510,655 $790 $W $20 511.525 11,963 25%g55 $13,768 Qty of Rosemead aye San Dimas No Comparable Class Na Carryaab@Class C'dyofSan Gabrel P6rrdng Division Manager £6,619 $766 $9,520 51,240 ins he $10,660 51,166 277ag55 512,745 Coy of South P sadene No Co aabt Class CI olWalmf No Comparable Class Cdy diean eCdy PMrudm Manager $9,592 $9,592 5919 Inc inc $10,511 $1,422 25%4055 511,932 Mango 59,427 $9,5540 $10,691 $12,251 X+1- 1.714 45% .1.3% -2.]% Medan 55,692 $9,761 $10.905 512,538 %e1. OA% -1d% 4.7% 5,1 Insurance Bends Data Medne DeOr±sr 2012 Relrement9eneiits Mean Gaa(nss lan ?NWS:552ma Ralph Andersen 3A ca0es City o1Templa Clly Seaeary Y %9$07 m9 CmnpxeMeCas Long Os, Comp Ret Pickup Other Cash. Daen Cash Heats OenW Anion Base Cain Ira Erne. RA Ras, Fang pact tun Ire. .Ret GaysAs&'e ply dPnw RI ofcathin Pram City atClamad CByofCaina City el Diamond Ba CMolDMsk CtyafGidma City iL Puente C'ryela Vane CTycl Monrovia COyorManlehso 41 Pah py ofAomnead - CdyofSan Dimas Gty of Sint Gabriel 91 &Sash Faadee CINotWahnl Aortistahe Assistant INnlnishaheSeetay agate Sectary Mmin6batAss'shnl SeniorAlminBlntlw Technician Mmotis'ralwAssistan Mmnsha8w Seoeh7 MrrdistasveAssis¢A A4rvmsoarre Secretary Administrative Secretary Adnidsh-the Seotry Sensory Mouristrive Santry Minhisnairie Assistant Adninisttralve Smeary AdrrittaMePssishri II MrnS8ve&eentity Admhstraffire AsskhN $4,19 $4890 54,459 $4,172 $4,202 $4,720 $4,652 $4,286 5{,131 $3,946 54,910 $3,405 $4,734 54,345 54,339 665 54}0 54265 $177 521 5615 $434 5184 598 $312 39 $210 5379 Bend's $304 534 5362 5917 5209 Data NotAvo8abkfor $4:340 669 $4770 $4,255 $6,111 $5,098 $4,652 S'266 $3,946 $1,910 was $4,734 $4,549 55;077 6;387 54,847 94.748 5859 51,287 $950 $914 $952 $1,020 5854 $90 ' $1,377 $400 $1,090 695 $1,90 $1,110 $1,340 $625 $1,050 inc int inc inc inc $58 5145 int Pgenc, $33 $41 bit $50 it inc it $75 Inc $30 is $32 in inc inc $25 $12 $12 Inc $20 bit inc it $20 tre 55,220 $6295 $5,752 $5,159 56,09 56,175 55,677 55,118 $5,286 $5,364 $4,495 55,43 .9,249 56,187 $6,717 55,417 55,799 5817 $99 $735 5603 $693 5548 $398 $598 $610 $1,136 5681 $848 $445 $442 $99 $622 $511 25660 2%655 27%®.5 2%65 25%Q55 2%655 2%650 25%655 17%655 17%655 25%655 2%655 214655 27%6,$ 2%655 2%655 $6,346 $6,95 $6,487 $5,973 $6,716 $6,724 $6,075 55,716 $5,896 $6,500 $5,156 $5,347 $6,691 55,E $7,195 $5,99 55,309 8,t aT®epk ay Secretary $4,31 54,931 5919 Inc ire 55650 6751 29%655 $5,50 Average % 1- $4,363 11.5% $4,622 5$% 55,547 3.5% $6,322 39% Median %+I- $4,342 119% $1,734 40% 55,577 10% 58,347 15% Cash Supple h Ito sans Bane Data Ettentt December 2012 Mean Sagan .7.55% P Median Cerro .1d% *tan Gegtoes 05% PmtWl-LM013 Ralph Andersen 5 Associates Data 58ecik Decemba2012 Cloy ci Tamp City Tree Trimmer Sum/ 800008 CampraGe Class Ma ca09' Dd. tamp, Ra Kul Wier cash Base+ cash Health Denhl Vision Base+ Cash* Ira, 564.1181 Fc4. Farm. Base+ Cash* 915.4 DI an, alArcade No Campaabo Class GyofAzua Pei Mahfenance*ESE ll $4,405 $21 588 $4,514 $1,287 Inc inc $201 5576 2%0+3 55,771 Cityc ldvin Pal Maintenance Wortorll 53,752 $253 $4,015 $618 $32 $34 54,699 $619 27%055 $5,317 Ciy[(Clamant Treel4mmer II $4,361 587 $4,449 $914 Inc inc 5262 $840 2%®55 $5412 City el Covina Park Wolter $3,670 $425 $184 $4,279 $912 inc Inc 55,191 $605 25%®5 5,795 Gy of Diamond Bar No Comparable Clan Oily of Duarte No Comparable Gass City cfGlendora Mdeference Worts '62,934 53,934 $850 inc $12 54,196 $549 $5,345 Cry dLa Puente Mai1enanre Worker $3,651 Beres Data NotA,*le for ens Ag Cdyci Lan Maintenance Water II $3,558 - 53,558 $1,307 53 $4,898 $560 1S%955 $5,449 CkyaMonmaa Park MalnlenaiveWorker ll $4,276 $4,276 $400 $41 512 54,730 $989 27%0$ $5,715 City ofMonleSeeo TreeTnmmar $3,491 $3,491 $1,090 Inc '6c $4,591 $679 27%955 $5,259 City ofMonterey Park Yairdenance Worker $4336 $4,336 $775 $80 $16 $,187 5777 26%®55 55564 GyofRasemead Mamterrdarce Waker $3,555 $256 $3,911 $1,300 inc in 5,511 $374 2%955 55,685 C4cfSan Dimas Lardsape MaWNenanre Worker $4,141 $414 $290 $4,845 $1,110 Litt me $,955 $422 7%95 $6,377 City of San Gabriel Park Maintenance Worker II $4,167 $3333 $4,570 51240 Inc Inc $5,840 $891 27%055 56,732 Lily otSomh Pasadena Maitenra WOAerll 43,755 $265 $4280 $625 575 522 $4,770 $536 2%955 $5,305 ON/dent No Cam ade Class CtyolTemple Cry Time Trims, $4,546 $4,646 5919 Inc inc $5,565 $669 25%055 56,253 Average $3542 $4,166 $5,179 $5,626 %+4. 151% 145% 62% _ 62% Medan $3,860 $4,276 $5,187 $5,796 %+I 162% 8.0% 12% 7.3% Cash Su lea nts Insurance Benefits Retirement Benefits 14fim508sas .9.296 3 %Men Intnss .11% hk�r GeMmss o, Pat Oa 52.5113 Appendix APPENDIX C SALARY RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS Ralph Andersen a Associates City of Temple City Salary Recomnendations SalaryRangesset using Median Base Sal ry Recommended JobT9e CurrerrJob Title Curren Range Max Market Median Realm. Range16n Change Internal AfignmentAalary Setting Rationale t Asst to the City MgriEwn. Dew. Mgr. 2 3 4 S 6 2 Administrative Services D'sed°r a Personnel Analyst 1aAcwumard it Accounting Technrdan 12 13 City Clerk 14 DepuyCity Clerk 1s 16 Community Development Director 17 Budding Inspector It Bulding/HousingAssistant 19 m Pubic Safey and Serccas Manager 21 Senior Community Presentation Otcer n Community Preservation Officer 23 24 Maintenance Lead Worker an Maintenance Worker Executive Assistantto the City Manager Secretary OfceAssisant • v Penning Manager an Associate Planner 29 Pubic Safety Supentor it Parking Control Officer 32 33 SCS'-Sarne as CurrentSalary Asst. to the City MgriEwn. Dew. Mgt PxewdveAssisanitothe City Manager Secretary Receprmnet Administrative Services Director Personnel Analyst Acwuntard AcwuntAnatysl Lay C erk DeputyCdy Clerk Community Dewbpment Director Building Inspector BuildinglHousing Assistant Pubic Safety and Services Manager Senior Community Preservation Officer Community Preservation Officer Maintenance Lead Worker Maintenance Worker Planning Manager Associate Planner RblicSatty OMcer Parking Control Officer $ 9?7 $ 9,976 0.4% Appmx4% above Planning Manager $ 5, 6 $ 5,159 1 5,159 -6.0% Benchmark sett meet $ 4,9 1 £ 4,542 $ 4,342 -11.9% Benchmark; sett° market $ 3, 8 $ 3,556 $ 3,566 "5.8% Benchmark; sett market 5 12326 1 7,7 2,330 $12,5io 0.0% Benchmark set t market SCS 5,501 $ 5,501 -29,0% Bandanark; sett° market $ 6, 5 $ 5,720 $ 5,720 -11.8%Bendmaflsett market $ 5, 8 $ 1449 $ 4,449 -202% Bendmadr, sett market $ 1 4,9 $ 10 $ 6, $ 4 $ 8,462 $ 8,646 0.0% Benchmark sett market SCSI 4,963 $ 4,931 0.0% Benchmark sett market SCS' 2,402 $12,402 13.5% Benchmark sett market 5,737 $ 5,737 -10.8% Benemark set to market 4,532 $ 4,532 -f.1% Benchmark set to market 5 6, 0 $ 9213 3.9% Anemic 4% below Planning Manager S 6, 6 • $ 5,253 -20.6% Approx. 12% above Community Preservation Officer $ 5,64 $ 4,699 $ 4,699 -17.0% Benchmadc sett market $ 5,1R9 $ 4,1h9 $ 9, $ 6, $ 4,457 -13.5% Approx. 12% above Maintenance Worker $ 3,962 $ 3,962 -3.8% Bendunark sett market $ 9,592 S 9,592 0.0% Benchmark sett° market SCS' $ 6,332 S 6,485 0.0% Benchmary self market SCS' $ 7,12 $ 7,951 4.6% Approe 16% below Pubic Safely and Services Manager 5 5,1 9 $ 4,169 $ 4,169 •1E.7°% Benchmark setts market Pt, Dale, Ra%%Andersen &Assocj,s City of Temple City Salary Recommendations Salary Ranges set using Medan Base Salary 34 a n m 41 42 Recommended Job Pik Current Job Title Cure Manes Mahn Ream Range 1144 w•% Change Inlarml t.5 nmeim'Sal Setting Rahn*Range% 9 uY 9 Para & Recreation oindor Peke Recreation Mitch $ 10,9 511,497 $11,497 52% Bendanait he to market Administrative Camd'nator Parks & Re, Admin. Coordinator S- 5,2 5 4,731 -24.5% Room. 12% above Parks & Recreation Coordbator Pada & Recreation Superior New alas — S 4,900 — Approx. 16% above Pads a Recreation Coordinator Pants d Re rration Coordeator Packs & Recreation Coordnater $ 5,5 $ 4,224 $ 4,224 -24.3% Bendmadc sotto market Community Semas Specialist Community SeMces Speda&al $ 4, 1 $ 3,771 -23.5% Approx. 12% below Parks 6 Recreation Coordinator Pat Maintenance had Worker Pads Maintenance Lead Winker $ 5,1 9 1 4,405 -14.1% Aypmx 12% above Park Maintenance Worker Park MaintenanteWorker Park Mainanarr Worker $ 4,19 $ 3,934 $ 3,034 -4.5% Benchmark mitt market Tree Trimmer Lead Worker Tree Trimmer Lead Worker $ 5,19 $ 4,323 -15.7%Appmc 12% above Tree Trimmer Tree Trimmer Tree Tdmmer $ 4, " $ 3,850 $ 3,260 -16.9% Benchmark sat to market SCS-Sameas Cowl Saki/ 2 vsraoutsnowtn a Ralph Andersen & Aao,les City of Temple City Salary Recommendations • PT Job Classes Salary Ranges set using Median Base Salary Recommended Job Title CurrentJob Title Coent Range Max Recomm Range Max 14-% Change lAllgnmentlSalarySef6ngRationale Moe Assistant Cashieritypist $ 1625 $ 20.57 256% Maintain serve relationship wtth Ft class Community Preservation Officer ,a4ime) Community Preservation Officer (partfnne) $ 3021 $ 25.82 -14.6°%Maintain same relationship with FT class Maintenance Worker arl-flme) Maintenance Helper (part-time) $ 15.32 $ 14.76 -3.7% Maintain same raiationsitpiaith FT class Paddng Control Officer (pad -time) Parking Control Officer (part-time) $ 1720 $ 15.08 -15.8°%Maintain same relationship ?Oh FT class Park Patrol Officer (pad -time) Park Patrol Officer (part-time) $ 3021 $ 25.82 -14.6% Same as Community Preservation Officer (part-6me) Senior Recreation Leader Senior Recreation Leader $ 16.06 $ 13.60 -15.4% Approx. 20% above Recreation Leader II IRecreation Leader ll Recreation Leader] $ 1320 $ 11.33 -142% Benchmark set to market Recreation Leader! Recreation Leader $ 10.85 $ 9.44 -13.0% Approx. 20% below Recreation Leader II Recreation Aide Recreation Aide $ 9.86 $ 8.43 -14.5% Approx. 12'%below Recreation Leader I SCS' - Same as Current Salary PSI Dale. 51108015 QTY OF TEMPLE TY FULL11MEMONHLY YRA06E5 WSCALYEAR 20 14 FALM% CI5SIFlCA11098 k 2 STEPS 3 4 5 6 7 Ptmuntant $ 4,521 $ 4,'01 $ 4,889 $ 5,085 $ 5,229 $ 5,00 $ 5,720 PrmunongTerhn'a'an inn in'I97a7a,' a Coordinator $ 3,516 $ 3,739 $ 3, $ 3, 57 89 $ 3903 $ 4,344 $ 3,955 $ 4,206 S 4,113 $ 4,374 $ 4,278 $ 4,549 $ 4,449 $ 4,731 Administrative Service Director $ 9,751 - - - - • $ 12,376 Asistantto the Coy Manager/EonomicDerelopmer4 Manage $ 7,884 - - - - - $ 9,976 Asociat2 Planner 'Building $ 5,125 $ 3,130 $ 5,543 $ 5,765 $ 5,996 $ 6,736 $ 6,485 Inspector $ 4534 $ 4,115 $ 4,904 $ 5,100 $ 5,304 $ 5,516 $ 5,737 Building/Housing Assistant $ 3,582 $ 3, 25 $ 3,874 $ 4,029 $ 4,190 $ 4,358 $ 4,532 Gty Clerk $ 6,833 - - - - $ 8,646 Community Development Director $ 9,801 •- - - $ 12,402 Community Preservaion Officer $ 3,714 $ 3962 $ 4,017 4,177 $ 4,344 $ 4,518 $ 4,699 Fortuity Services Specialist $ 2,980 $ 3,099 $ 3,223 3,352 $ 3,487 $ 3,626 $ 3,771 DepuyGtyGet $ 3,897 $ 4 153 $ 4,215 4,384 $ 4,559 $ 4,741 $ 4,931 4ec'AIR AslstaMto the Otyringer $ 4,077 - - - - - $ 5,159 MaimerraneWorker $ 3,131 $ 3 6 $ 3,397 3,512 $ 3,663 $ 3,810 $ 3,962 Maintenance Led Worker :Management $ 3,507 $ 3647 $ 3,793 3,944 $ 4,102 $ 4,2g $ 4,437 Analyst $ 4,469 $ 4648 $ 4934 5,027 $ 5,272 $ 5;438 5 5,655 OrnceAsslsam $ 2,812 $ 2 31 $ 3,048 3,170 $ 3,297 $ 3,479 $ 3,566 Park Weirenance Led Wader $ 3,482 $ 3 521 $ 3,766 3,917 $ 4,074 $ 4,237 $ 4,406 'flirt Maintenance Worker $ 3,109 $ 3233 $ 3,363 3,497 $ 3,637 $ 3,723 $ 3,934 Sing Control Officer $ 3,295 $ 3427 $ 3,564 3,706 $ 3,854 $ 4,009 $ 4,169 'Parks and Recreation Coordinator $ 3,338 $ 3 72 $ 3,611 3,755 $ 3,905 $ 4,062. $ 4,224 Parks and Accretion Dlroector $ 9,086 - - - - $ 11,497 Path and Recreation Supervisor $ 3,873 $ 027 $ 4,129 4,356 $ 4,530 $ 4,711 $ 4500 Per noel Arslyt $ 4,348 $ 521 $ 4,702 a 4290 $ 5,086 $ 5,289 $ 5,501. PlannirgMarreger $ 7581 • - - - $ 9,592 Public Wand Series Manager $ 7,289 - - - - - $ 9,223. Public Safely Supervisor $ 6,284 - - $ 7,951 $cretery $ 3,432 $ 569 $ 3,712 $ 3,84,0 $ 4,014 $ 4175 $ 4341 Sere Community Preservation 0l&er $ 4,159 $ 326 $ 4,499 $ 4,673 $ 4,866 $ 5,061 $ 5,29. Tree Tdmmer $ 3,051 $ 173 $ 3,300 $ 3,432 $ 3,559 $ 3,712 $ 3,860 ire Trimmer Lead Worisr $ 3,417 $ 553 $ 3,695 $ 3,843 $ 3,997 $ 4,157 $ 4,323 m X. I N QTY OF TEMPLE CITY PART.TIME HOURLY SALARY RANGES FISCAL TAR 2013-14 PART-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS 1 2 STEPS 3 4 5 6 Accountant Assistant Intern Senior Recreation Leader Recreation Leader II Recreation Leader I Recreastion Aide Other Part -Time Positions' 1616 1L32 10.75 8,95 7.46 6.66 $ 16.91 11.77 11.18 931 7.76 6.93 $ 1738 12.24 11.63 9.68 8.07 7.21 $ 18.29 1233 12,09 10.07 839 7,49 $ 19.02 13.24 12.57 10.48 8.73 7,79 $ 19.78 13.77 13.08 10.89 908 8.11 * If a full time classification is tilled with a part-time position, the monthly salary of that full time classification will be converted to an hourly rate. m x z