Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD06579 E the City Council hereby expressly declaring that it would have passed the remaining; portions of this Ordinance with the invalid I portions omitted. PASSED: February 17, 1958 APPROVED:___'__2/12�58__,______ Arthur W. Ellis /s/ Arthur W. Ellis 8j_ PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL MAYOR , ORDINANCE NO. 6579 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND THE CI'T'Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY TO ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY A CONTRACT WITH HARLAND BARTHOLOMEW AND ASSOCIATES PERTAINING TO THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEERING REPORT PERTAINING TO .OFFSTREET PARKING, STREET WIDENING AND NEW STREETS IN THE CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1„ The Mayor and the City Clerk of the City of Jefferson City, Missouri, are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to enter into and execute a contract with Harland Bartholomew and Associates of St. Louis, Missouri, pertain-) ing to the preparation of an engineering report pertaining to offstreet parking street widening and new streets in the City of Jefferson City, Missouri. SECTION 2. Said contract shall be in words and figures as follows: AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI, AND HARLAND BARTHOLOMEW AND ASSOCIATES OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI I. GENERAL RECITALS THIS CONTRACT, made this day of , 1958, by and between the City of Jefferson City, Missouri, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, hereinafter designated the "CITY" , and Harland tartholomew and Associates, city planners - civil engineers - landscape architects, ) a partnership of 317 North 11th Street, St. Louis, Missouri, consisting of Harland Bartholomew, Russell H. Riley, Harry W. Alexander, Eldridge Lovelace, Donald Wolbrink and William S. Pollan , Jr. , hereinafter designated the "ENGINEER" ; WITNESSETH, THAT, WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the professional services of the ENGINEER for the performance of certain preliminary engineering studies relative to parking and traffic improvements in the central area, and traffic and street improvements throughout the city; and WHEREAS, the CITY is authorized by Ordinance No. 6579 to enter into this agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and of the mutual covenants herein set forth, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto: II. ENGINEER' S SERVICES The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various �I professional services required for these studies as follow: A. Parking Engineering Study and Engineering Report .7.•�^Wk-0 This study would relate most specifically to the mutter of µ parking within the central area (the area between Mulberry and Marshall Streets and between Elm Street and State Street, these boundaries not being rigidly fixed but allowing of extension if the ! studies seem to warrant such extension; also included would be ) parking in the south side commercial area) . Specifically, the study would involve the following: �! 1. Re-evaluation of the locations presently under considerate n as off-street parking lots. The re-evaluation would involve an up-to-dating of the parking use characteristics as deter- mined in our older studies, would involve an up-to-dating of �( the curb and off-street parking inventory of the older studies would involve up-to-dating and some internal-internal suppleme - tation of the origin-destination study recently performed by the State, and would involve a re-check of land uses in the central area. Also involved in this phase of the study would be conferences with representatives of State government in an effort to determine their future plans insofar as this is determinable. I 2. Recommendations as to appropriate design features, includ- in such items as proposed solution of utility problems, types of retaining walls, type of surfacing, and all other design features including, in the instance of potential multi-level structures, all considerations necessary to insure that there will be no waste in the ultimate conversion to a structure. 3. . : Recommendations as to appropriate rates and time regulatio s for all municipally controlled space in the central and south side areas. 1 4. Estimates of cost for land acquisition (this to be obtainer through the City from local real estate people) , demolition, and construction. Estimates of maintenance costs would also be included. 5. Preparation of a financial analysis indicating the expected revenues from the off-street program, the on-street program, and the two in combination. 6. Evaluation of the relationship of parking to traffic flow in the central area. This would be a form of flow-capacity analysis involving the projection of flow to the design-year o 1980 and analyzing and giving recommendations relative to the more obvious and large scale improvements which should be madel to facilitate traffic flow both at the present and in the future. 7. Projection of parking demand for a reasonable period into the future. i 8 . Both- items 6 and 7 would take into consideration the immediately proposed improvements in Jefferson City. B. Traffic Engineering Study and Traffic l Report for the Central Area 1. A determination of both present and projected 1980 flow one the streets of the area described in A above. This would i involve up-to-dating the flow data in the State Highway Department' s recent origin-destination study report; this I� up-to-dating would be accomplished by machine counts at selected locations throughout- the area. The projection would be done on the basis of accepted projection techniques, 11 following conferences with the State Highway Department. Consideration would be given to the plans for the proposed expressway and its diversion from many of these central area streets. The capacity of streets within the study area would be determined, particular attention being paid to intersection ;; this latter would involve some intersection counts. 2. Maximum use would be made of the origin-destination study prepared by the State, which study would be up-to-dated and would include internal-internal movement estimates predicated on nationally accepted techniques, 3. An isochronic or time-and-delay study would be made with the cooperation of public employees and representation of down-town employees, utilizing forms prepared by this office. The purpose of this' study is to show specific "bottleneck" areas and point up the extent to which they contribute to congestion. 4. Land use up-to-dating in the central area. 5. Preparation of an inventory of signing and signalization within the central area. 6. Recommendations as to specific steps to be taken to improv traffic flow in the central area. This would include recommendations as to signing, painting, signalization and its timing, curb parking regulation, the elimination- of or control of turning movements, the advisability of any one-way street arrangements, and other such capacity increasing consideration . these recommendations would involve three levels, namely a. immediate improvements, b. improvements immediately following the completion of the expressway, and c. improvements for the design-year 1980. C. Parkin, and Traffic Engineering Study and Engineering Resort for Central Area and for all Other Street haprovements througli- out the Jefferson City Area This would involve: 1. Up-to-dating of land uses in the Jefferson City area. Thi would not be a highly detailed land use inventory, but would suffice to show the extent and nature of growth which has taken place since the completion of the land use studies made earlier by this firm. 2. An isochrone or time-and-delay study to determine areas of maximum congestion in the city. This would be a study re- quiring the cooperation of numerous employees in the central area. This firm would prepare appropriate forms, give necessary instructions, and compile and digest data obtained. 3. Up-to-dating the origin-destination study made by the State, including estimation of internal-internal movements by nationally accepted techniques'. " The current origin-destina io data would then be projected to the design.-year of 1980, again utilizing well-known techniques, toward the end of providing an ultimate check against just which improvements would provide maximum benefit to Jefferson City. 4. A detailed check of those improvements proposed by the Mayor' s Committee. This analysis and check would be followed by proposed specific recommendations as to exactly what improvements should be made, involving such items as the effec ,�. ..r. rr �.�.::i.i'4�i/jii.•••,.• nrA..rrY.......•..••• on utilities, on cross street crowns, on adjoining property, etc. 5 . Recommendation of proposed standards of improvement by specific location of improvement. 6. Preparation of estimates of cost of improvements. 7 . Preparation of a proposed completion schedule. 8 . Necessary meetings with official bodies in order to presen the findings of the above described studies and to make recommendations included therein toward the end of the necessary final decisions . 9 . Preparation of a suitably illustrated engineering report setting forth the above studies and reco=Aendations . This would be a mimeographed report, suitably illustrated, of which seventy-five (75) copies would be furnished the CITY. The ENGINEER will place competent personnel in the CITY during ) the course of this study as he deems necessary and will, as a part of the fee cited under IV following, pay all salaries, travel and living expenses of employees of the ENGINEER during the course of this study. III. CITY' S SERVICES The CITY agrees to provide to the ENGINEER without delay and at no cost to the ENGINEER, the following: A. Real estate acquisition estimates or appraisals . B. Minimal office space in some public building. This would involve no more than a desk, telephone and drawing table. C. Availability of pertinent maps, drawings, reports and other data contributory to the successful prosecution of this study IV. PAYMENTS The CITY agrees to pay to the ENGINEER as compensation for the above described professional engineering services the lump sum amount of Ten Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($10, 350 .00) This will be. paid in accordance with the following schedule: During first week of April. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3,500 .00 i During first week of May. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3,500 .00 Upon completion and submittal of printed reports. .$3,350 .00 Should the CITY desire to extend the scope of this agreement to cover in greater detail items not cited under ENGINEER' S SERVICE above, the ENGINEER agrees to accept as compensation for such work actual salary costs (defined as payroll book salaries, plus social security, unemployment tax and insurance for employees) plus One Hundred Per Cent (100%) as profit and overhead, plus out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of the work. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the CITY has caused this agreement to be signed by Arthur W. Ellis as Mayor and attested by its City Clerk, and Harland Bartholomew and Associates have executed this instru- ment on the day and year first above written. CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI ATTEST: By Henry Ells, City Clerk Arthur W. Ellis, Mayor ( .