Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution No. 048-95 01-24-1995 RESOLUTION NO.48-95 • A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS APPROVING AND ENDORSING THE 1995 (21ST YEAR) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of Richland Hills shares in a cooperative agreement with Tarrant County for essential Community Development Assistance Activities under Public Law 93-383, The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; and WHEREAS, at least one public hearing for the purpose of identifying and discussing Community Development Projects, has been duly held by the City of Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, after said public hearings and due consideration, the City Council of Richland Hills, determined that the following were eligible for funding under this Act, and approved the filing of application for said funding; for wastewater line rehabilitation as shown on the attached Exhibit. WHEREAS, it is understood that any funds not expended on the specifically approved projects will revert to the Community Development Contingency Fund, and should any repayment of funds be required by HUD due to ineligible or non-refundable projects, the City would be • responsible for repayment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF RICHLAND HH,LS, TEXAS THAT, said 1995 (21st Year} Community Development Project for the City of Richland Hills, be approved and endorsed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION THIS JANUARY 24, 1995, BY A VOTE OF 5 AYES, 0 NAYS AND 0 ABSTENTIONS. G C.F. KELLEY, ~ AYDR l/ ATTEST: TE" I WII,L S, CITY S RETARY • Attach to Resolution 48-95 EXHIBIT City of Richland Hills 21st Year CDBG Project Summary Jennifer Leigh Area $ 87,351.00 Birch/Cedar Park Drive Area $106,326.00 TOTAL: $193,677.00 • • KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. OPINION OF COST JOB NO: 30-415 OWNER: City of Richland Hills • DATE: January 24, 1995 Tarrant County Texas PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Wastewater Line Rehabilition - CDBG 21st Year - -r = ~ - _ _ DESCRIPTION OF UNIT !,ITEM I TOTAL ~ UNIT NO_ 'UNIT 'QUANTITY PRICE COST - -T~-- _ ==y_-- ! Jennifer Lei h Area ~ i i~, Line "A1" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction 1. L.F.. 97.00 $50.00 ! $4,850.00: !!Line "A1" - Sanita Sewer Manhole Refurbishment 2. V.F. I 5.00 ~ $75.00 I $375.00 ';Line "A2" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction 3. L.F. ! 308.00 $50.00 $15,400.00 ' !1 Line "A2" - Sanita Sewer Manhole Refurbishment ~ 4. V.F. 7.50 $75.00 $562.50 ' Line "A" Engineering ' I i $2 118.75 _ Line "A" Estimated Cost i 23,306.25 ' ' ;Line "B1" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction I 1. ~ L.F. I 50.001 $50.001 $2,500.00 !!Line "B1" -Sanitary Sewer Manhole Refurbishment 2. V.F. 5.20 ! $75.00 ~ $390.00 ~I LLine "B2" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction I 3. L.F. i 42.00 ! $50.00 ! $2,100.00 II Line "62" -Sanitary Sewer Manhole Refurbishment ! 4. V.F. ! 5.00 I $75.00. $375.00 i~ Line "B3" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction 5. L.F. 547.00 ' $50.00 $27,350.00 Line "B" Engineering $3,271.50 it Line "B" Estimated Cost i j ' ~ $35,986.50 I' ~ ~ 1 ',Line "C1" - 6" Sanitary Sewer Line Reconstruction ! 1. L.F. 495.00 ; $50.00 $24,750.00 !Line "C1" -Sanitary Sewer Manhole Refurbishment, 2. V.F. 10.10; $75.00 ~ $757.50 • ~ Line "C" En ineerin i I i $2 550.75 Line "C" Estimated Cost ~ $28,058.25 ~ ~ ~ I f~ !i ~ ITi ~ ~ j , I ~ ! I I I I ~ i REVIEWED & APPROVED: ;SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $87,351.00'' ~ 1 _ j INCL. ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ~ ' • ~ PROJECT MANAGER i TOTAL OPINION OF COST ~ $87,351.00!1. G.R. Phili Jr. P.E. FILE: D:,RICHHILL`,41S,EtiGRESTI.W'K3 KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. OPINION OF COST JOB NO: 30-415 OWNER: City of Richland Hills • DATE: January 24, 1995 Tarrant County Texas PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Wastewater Line Rehabilition - CDBG 21st Year DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 'ITEM ' TOTAL I UNIT i NO. (UNIT QUANTITY' PRICE COST Birch%Cedar Park Drive Area ''Line "D1" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction 1. L.F. 62.00 , $50.00 $3,100.00 Line "D1" - Sanita Sewer Manhole Refurbishment 2. V.F. ~ 9.60 $75.00 $720.00 Line "D2" - 8" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction 3. L.F. ' 501.00 $55.00 $27,555.00 Line "D2" - Sanita Sewer Manhole Refurbishment 4. V.F.. 9.70 $75.00 $727.50 Line "D3" - 8" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction 5. L.F. ~ 495.00 $55.00 $27,225.00 '.Line "D3" -Sanitary Sewer Manhole Refurbishment 6. V.F. ' 9.10'. $75.00 i $682.50 Line "D" Engineering i 1- $6,001.00 Line "D" Estimated Cost ~ i ~ $66,011.00 I ~ I Line "E1" - 6" Sanita Sewer Line Reconstruction i 1. ! L.F. 588.00 ~ $50.00 i $29,400.00 Line "E" Engineering ~ $2,940.00 Line "E" Estimated Cost I r $32,340.00 ! I 'Line "F1" - 6" Sanitary Sewer Line Reconstruction 1. ~ L.F. 145.00 $50.00 $7,250.00 Line "F" Engineering i ' ~i ~ $725.00 Line "F" Estimated Cost ~ ! $7,975.00 • ~i , i i i + ~ I t - ~ I i I; ' i 4 ~ ~ ' i REVIEWED & APPROVED: !SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $106,326.00 j INCL. ENGINEERING & SURVEYING • PROJECTti1ANAGER I TOTAL OPINION OF COST ; $106,326.00'.' G.R. Philipp Jr., P.E. FILE: D:'~RICHHILL\414\ENGRESTl.~"K3 . o ~ -~`~i=.rr ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I . ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ TR 2J2 I -j 1. I ~ ~ ~ 2.,_ 2A~,~ A 1 2,. ; , - - ~ ~ : ~ ~ - i'~ iA j ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ T~.2~~ ~ _ 2 3 . ~ 2 4 v1 ~ T-_ A z z ~ ~ ~.A2 , A J ( 3 O 5 2 , -R., ' 4 ~ I 4 ~ 6 ~ i T;.2B 2B2 + ~ c ~ R.2, I 5 ~ 7 8 i 6 6 g ~ TR. i TR.2A4~ • g ~ 2A4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B 3 TR.2A4G ~ 2 , , o 2 2 8 A ~ ~ 9 i lA 11B i ~~\~I~~~ _~IG^ ~ 2 ~I i 3 10 ~ 2A ~,~1. ER 3 ~ ~0 c 1 2B ~~A~~~~~, ' ` i1 3A I ~ • I N e N [ [[i Z a g ~ ~ B 6 ~ ~ ~ 1 ` ' ~ 15 "~A 1B 2Aj28 3A~3B~4A~4B~ ~ - - 35 ~ i -f---- -o 2 ~ i 2 3 4 S i_ j ~ I a^ 7 8 9 " 0 1 ~ , 2 34 i I ~ I', 3 i ~ •z • 25 ~ I ~ 24 23 3 3 i 4 X 2 2 21 2 19 i 8 6 i 15 • ~ ~ i I "G 32 , 5 i ~ I i 7 ~ 8 ~ 9 "0 12 ~ 13 ~ 14 15 ! 16 , 3 ~ i ! _ i i I i ~ ~ I' ' z-, 29 _K ~ ~ F ~ ' i i 2E 1 2 ( 1 42' 4„ 4 ` ~ 2 1 ; p ~,RK ~R I 39 ` 40 4 ' 4R ~ AK I 38 3 1 6 I ~ I ~ 4 3 2 ~ 5 z_ I - 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~ , , I i ~ ~ 3 I 25 5 29 6 30 7 33 ~ i0 ~ ~l ~ I 6 28 7 29 ~ 8 32 i 1 E 4 I 24 I 7 27 8 28 ~ 3" 12 25 I 5 I 23 8 26 9 27 10 Y 13 9J' G F 6 ~I 22 9 25 1C ~ 26 ~ 11 ~ c. ~ "~4 E ~I ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I 10 24 11 y 25 ~ 12 28 15 Y 7 ~ 21 Y ~ ~ ~ j nil '1 ~ 23 12 ~ 24 ~3 2- ~ 16 ~ I I 1 ` I- 8 ~I 20 2 22 13 T 23 ~;i 14 ~ Z ~ 17 I I t 9 OI 19 13 ~ 21 14 ~ 22 E, 15 2= ' 8 ~ 9 { ~ m ~I , 4 20 ~ 15 2 ~ ~ 2~ ~ 1g "8 ,0 I 18 • I 15 19 16 20 ~ ~7 2z 20 l I 17 ~ 16 18 17 19 ~ 1g 22 ~ 21 .6 I i 24 -22 1 ~ i ~ '8 I! 13 I 2' 2 ~ ~ i a 2 23 2 ~ 17 ^ 2 li 12 ~ ~ I 3 22 3 20 3 ~ 16 IC% z I, 0 3 I ,3 ,g 4 o i 21 4 ~ 15 ~ I~ ? 0 ~ a i8 5 . 2 20 5 ~ ~ 14 ~ II 9 ~ 5 6 i 19 6 7 ~ 13 ~ ~i 8 i 16 ~ 10 6 18 7 8 ~ 12 15 9 7 17 8 9 ~ 1' 1c ~ g 16 9 ~z 10 . ' • 8 9 15 10 ~ 2 q ',C 'G 5 t0 ~ Tf2. RE G 11D1D ~ . ~ 5R 6 ii; _ _ 4rz ~ ~ ,.~r,.~~~ t n 9 - 1 ,,~~.{i, • 11)1 - - - TR. i 7 8 1D1C i . I 11-i A M .S8 ?8 1 1 ?1 1 19 1 17 1 15 1 I _ - - - - _ _ - - - 37 27 2 2 20 Z 18 2 16 2 14 [Y ~ TR. TR2 .S6 26 3 3 19 S 1 ~ 3 15 n -j 1-5-- S 2ti - _ - ~ _ - - - ~ 4 1 ? _ 4 35 25 4 4 18 Q 4 16 4 14 Q i _ n_ - a_ I ~ J 1, - --1-- ~ S4 c~ 24-- 5 5 17 r 5 15 5 13 n 5 11 r - - - - ~ - 6 ~ ..53 Q 23 6 ~ 16 n 6 14 6 12 ~ 6 10 6 ' - a_ - - - - _ C -I - • 7 11 ~ i 7 7 15 13 ~ 7 8 9 .5? ~~I2 ~ ~ _ ~ - g 8 14 8 12 31 ~ 21 9 10 TR 2D ~ g 9 13 8 9 i 30 20 ~ 9 10 11 10 ~ ~ 1 -71 19 - - . - - 10 11 12 ~ 6 7 8 ~ - ~ L - 1 - 7 8 _ 1 - _ - 1 ? ~ I 9 ~ _ I 27 17 - ~ 6 _ - 13 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 1- ? . 2 ~ ? 6 16 - - 1 - 15 _ ~ I 1 2 3 - l5 J 6 7 8 g I 1 a. ~ 3 4 I _ 10 1 1 _ ?L 1 2 42 43 ~ ~ \ 3 2 1 p ARK DR ( _ 39 40 41 r 9 \ 4R OAK ~ S8 6R 3 ~ - ~ - • 1 ~ - r ~ 5 ~ ~ 8 i I 1 ? 3 - L ~ 3:S ~ 4 36 ~ I ~ 31 4 37 ~ 3.~ ~ t ~ ~ _ ~ ' I, ,1- • 1 ? S