HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrdinance 62-86-AORDINANCE NO. 62 -86 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRI-
TORY, DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. 4 -A,
WEST TEMPLE CITY" TO THE CITY OF TEMPLE
CITY.
WHEREAS, on the llth day of June, 1962, the Council of
the City of Temple City did pass and adopt Resolution No. 62-
211 giving notice of the proposal to annex certain uninhabited
territory to the City of Temple,City, said territory being
therein designated as "Annexation No. 4 -A, West Temple City,"
said Resolution describing the boundaries of the territory
proposed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 62 -211 did contain a
notice of the day, hour and place, when and where the Council
of the City would hear protests made by any person owning real
property within the territory proposed to be annexed, the time
of said hearing being not less than forty nor more than sixty
days from the date of passage of said Resolution, and
WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of July, 1962 at the hour of
8 :00 p. m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of the
City of Temple City, County of Los Angeles, State of Califor-
nia, said time and place being the day, hour and place fixed
in said Resolution No. 62 -211 for hearing protests to the said
annexation, the said City Council did hear and pass upon all
protests made to the proposed annexation and did determine
that protests had not been made by the owners of one -half of
the value of the privately owned territory proposed to be an-
nexed as shown by the last equalized assessment roll, nor by
public owners of one -half of the value of the publicly owned
territory proposed to be annexed as determined by said legis-
lative body, and
WHEREAS, said territory is contiguous to the City of
Temple City, and is uninhabited territory in the County of Los
Angeles, and
WHEREAS, through a typographical error in typing a por-
tion of the correct legal area designated "Annexation No. 4 -A,
West Temple City" was omitted from Ordinance No. 62 -86, and
WHEREAS, it has become legally necessary to adopt a new
ordinance to correct the above referenced error,
NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 62 -86 is hereby repealed.
SECTION 2. The Council of the City of Temple City does
hereby approve the annexation of the territory hereinafter
described to the City of Temple City, and does hereby further
ordain that the said territory be and is hereby annexed to the
City of Temple City.
That said territory, the annexation of which to the
City of Temple City is herein approved, is all that territory
215
situated in the County of Los Angeles, State of California,
more particularly described as follows:
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED
"ANNEXATION NO. 4 -A WEST TEMPT,R, CITY - UNINHABITED"
TO THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
That parcel of land in the County of Los Angeles, State
of California, included within the following described
boundary:
Beginning at the intersection of the westerly line of
Reno Street (50 feet wide) as described in deed to the
County of Los Angeles recorded in Book 6182, page 25
of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder
of said County, with the northerly line of, Lot 70 of
Tract No. 3623 as shown on a map thereof recorded in
Book 40, page 52 of Maps in the said County Recorder's
Office; thence westerly along the northerly line of
said Lot 70, and along the northerly lines of Lot 69 and
Lot 68 of said Tract No. 3623 to the easterly line of
Eaton Wash as described in deed to the Los Angeles
County Flood Control District recorded in Book 7230,
page 110 of Deeds in the said County Recorder's Office;
thence northerly along said easterly line of said Eaton
Wash to the southerly line of Elm Avenue (40.00 feet
wide) as shown on Map of said Tract No. 3623, said
southerly line being the southerly boundary of Parcel
1 as described in deed to the County of Los Angeles
recorded in Book 13007, page 13 of Official Records in
the said County Recorder's Office; thence westerly
along the southerly boundary of said Parcel 1 to the
westerly line of said Eaton Wash; thence northerly
along the westerly line of said Eaton Wash to the east-
erly line of Muscatel Avenue (60.00 feet wide) as de-
scribed in deed to the County of Los Angeles recorded
in Book 1488, page 361 of Official Records in the said
County Recorder's Office; thence westerly at right
angles to said easterly line of Muscatel Avenue to the
center line of said Muscatel Avenue (40.00 feet wide)
as shown on Map of said Tract 3623; thence southerly
along the center line of said Muscatel Avenue to a line
parallel with the southerly line of Las Tunas Drive
(134.00 feet wide) as described in Final Judgment in
Case No. 269,622 of the Superior Court of the State of
California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, a cer-
tified copy of which was recorded in Book 12289, page
277 of Official Records in the said County Recorder's
Office and lying 100.00 feet southerly of the southerly
line of said Las Tunas Drive; thence easterly along
said parallel line to the westerly line of said Eaton
Wash; thence northerly along the westerly line of said
Eaton Wash to the southerly line of said Las Tunas
Drive; thence easterly along the said southerly line of
said Las Tunas Drive to the southerly prolongation of
the westerly line of said Reno Street; thence northerly
along the said southerly prolongation of the westerly
line of said Reno Street and the westerly line of said
Reno Street to the point of beginning.
PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temple City at a regular meeting thereof held on this day
2
216
1
1
of October, 1962 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Dickason, Fitzjohn, Merritt,
Nunamaker, Tyrell
NOES: Councilmen: None
ABSENT: Councilmen: None
ATTEST:
Clerk of the City of Temple/
City, California
Mayor of the ty of Temple City,
California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY )
I, William Woollett, Jr., City Clerk, do hereby certify
that I have been duly appointed City Clerk of the City of
Temple City and that the foregoing Ordinance No. 62 -86-A was
regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council
on October 8, 1962 and was regularly passed at a regular meet-
ing of the City Council on October 22, 1962 by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Dickason, Fitzjohn, Merritt,
Nunamaker, Tyrell
NOES: Councilmen: None
ABSENT: Councilmen: None
Dated.s. October 22, 1962
(12 00, _ _ 7.2 ),J-J.PL-V-71
City Clerk of`Ehe City of //Temple
City, California (/
3
217