Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout02.02.2016 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 2, 2016 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the January 19, 2016 Special Council Meeting B. Minutes of the January 19, 2016 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Temporary Liquor License to We Can Ride on July 16, 2016 at 2825 Willow Drive B. Approve Updated Engineering Standards C. Approve Pitney Bowes Mail Meter Lease Agreement D. Approve 2016 City Work Plan Goals VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Randy's Environmental Services Request for Residential Garbage Rate Increase B. Hamel Brewing — Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review — 22 Hamel Road — Public Hearing C. Baker Park Reserve Gully Project Study VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XI. ADJOURN Posted 1/29/2016 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE OF REPORT: DATE OF MEETING: SUBJECT: Medina City Council Scott Johnson, City Administrator January 28, 2016 February 2, 2016 City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Temporary Liquor License to We Can Ride on Drive — All paperwork is in order and the fees have approval. July 16, 2016 at 2825 Willow been paid. Staff recommends No attachments for this item. B. Approve Updated Engineering Standards— WSB recently updated the Design Manual, which includes both written engineering standards and detail plates for the design of streets and utilities. The manual is a culmination of work by City staff over the last several months and includes updates to the City's standard detail plates and new written sections providing more specific engineering criteria on how plans should be prepared for both City and private development projects. The last time either the detail plates or the engineering standards were updated was in 2011 and 2005 respectively. Moving forward, City staff plans to review the manual on an annual basis to determine if additional changes are warranted. To save on paper cost, the City will provide a couple of sets for viewing at the meeting or upon request. Staff recommends approval. No attachments for this item. C. Approve Pitney Bowes Mail Meter Lease Agreement — The lease agreement on the City's postage meter expires in 2016. Staff recommends approval of the new lease agreement for a 48 month term. Once the agreement is signed, the City's current postage meter will be replaced with a new meter. See attached agreement. D. Approve 2016 City Work Plan Goals — City Council members and staff met during a work session on January 19th to discuss goals for the year. A list of the goals has been prepared for Council review and approval. Staff recommends approval. See attached list. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Randy's Environmental Services Request for Residential Garbage Rate Increase — Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup has prepared the attached memo explaining Randy's request to increase the residential garbage rate by $.75 per month per household. Staff will be meeting with Randy's on Monday, February 1st, to further discuss their request and will provide additional information at the meeting. See attached memo and attachments. B. Hamel Brewing — Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review — 22 Hamel Road — Public Hearing - 22 Hamel Road LLC has requested a Site Plan Review for construction of a structure to include a bar, brewery, and food service at 22 Hamel Road. The applicant also requests a conditional use permit for an outdoor dining, drinking, and entertainment area as an accessory use. See attached report. Potential Motion: Direct staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit, subject to the conditions described in the staff report. C. Baker Park Reserve Gully Project Study — The Pioneer Sarah Creek Watershed agreed to fund $5,159.50 of the feasibility report for this project. The approval is contingent on Medina, Independence, and Three Rivers contributing to the cost of the feasibility study and the watershed portion will be reduced by any grant funds received for the study. The $5,159.50 funding contribution is a major step forward for this watershed. They have only agreed to fund 10% in the past. Commissioner Mike McLaughlin will be at the February 2nd meeting to discuss this opportunity in further detail and the cost participation requested from Medina is $5,159.50. See attached memo. Recommended Motion: Approve funding from the Stormwater Utility Fund for $5,159.50 for the Baker Park Gully Project Study. X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003509E-003523E for $49,853.58, order check numbers 43915-43978 for $283,661.77, and payroll EFT 506933-506958 for $47, 797.43. INFORMATION PACKET • Planning Depat intent Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 19, 2016 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in special session on January 19, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Pederson, Cousineau, Mitchell, Anderson Members absent: Martin Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Public Safety Director Ed Belland, and Finance Director Erin Barnhart II. Introduction and Overview of Goal Setting Session Mitchell and Johnson provided a brief overview of the meeting purpose and facilitation. III. Overview of 2015 Work Plan Johnson provided an overview document of the 2015 Work Plan which illustrated the accomplishment of goals by all departments. He provided information on the past year work plan and indicated that 40 goals have been completed and that 10 of the 2015 goals are on -going tasks or were not completed in 2015. The on -going goals from 2015 will be incorporated into the 2016 Goals. IV. Administration Department Johnson provided background on the department's functions and list of goals for 2016. Following discussion, the Council directed Staff to order tablets for Mayor Mitchell and Council Member Cousineau. They will use the tablets for electronic packets for six months and will bring their feedback to the City Council to determine if electronic packets will be implemented for the entire City Council. V. Planning Department Finke provided background on the department's functions and list of goals for 2016. Following discussion, City Planner Dusty Finke informed Council that Sioux Drive will be added to the MSA Road Analysis for 2016. VI. Public Works Department Scherer provided background on the deparinient's functions and list of goals for 2016. Following discussion, Public Works Director Steve Scherer informed Council that a portion of Cottonwood Trail will be built to a 9 ton standard and he will research the Willow Drive Water Tower rehab project for 2016. VII. Finance Barnhart provided background on the department's functions and list of goals for 2016. Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 1 January 19, 2016 Following discussion, Finance Director Erin Barnhart discussed equipment bonds, Council review of Finance procedures, and insurance. VIII. Police Department Belland provided background on the department's functions and list of goals for 2016. Following discussion, the Council requested Staff add discussion on developing critical incident plans with our businesses at the Business Forum and bring the proposed changes to the Hamel FD agreement to the Feb. 16th Work Session. IX. Other Discussion Topics Johnson also updated Council on the search for grant opportunities. Department Heads have done an excellent job of finding grant opportunities and will continue to pursue grants. Adjournment Mitchell closed the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 2 January 19, 2016 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 19, 2016 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on January 19, 2016 at 6 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Tom Kellogg, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief 16 of Police Ed Belland. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 21 The agenda was approved as presented. 22 23 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 24 25 A. Approval of the January 5, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 26 It was noted on page two, line 38, it should state, "...onto on to his vest." On page three, 27 line 16, it should state, "...expose expose..." On page three, line 20, it should state, 28 "...to detect fraud." On page three, line 49, it should state, "...vacate a portion of right- 29 of -way on Palm Street, to include that which would be included in square footage of in 30 the lots when they were are platted." On page three, line 48, it should state, "...shoreline 31 overlay Shoreland Overlay..." On page three, it should state, "J. Johnson Commissioner 32 Johnson..." On page four, line two, it should state, "...because the right-of-way to be 33 vacated..." On page four, line five, it should state,"...north of the vacated area..." On 34 page four, line seven, it should state, "...added to the lots..." On page four, line five, it 35 should state, "...improvements needs or uses..." On page five, line ten, it should state, 36 "...requested for vacation vacated..." On page five, line 29, it should state, 37 "...meticulous adjacent..." On page six, line 15, it should state, "...not a formal 38 primary..." On page seven, line eight, it should state, "...development, that would satisfy 39 the parking in her opinion." On page seven, line 42 "...stated that asked whether..." On 40 page nine, line seven, it should state, "...covenants for the development." On page ten, 41 line 10, it should state, "...both cities Plymouth and Medina..." 42 43 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the January 5, 2016 regular 44 City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 45 46 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:06 p.m.) 47 48 A. Approve Amendment to Communications Site Lease Agreement (Ground) 49 with SBA Tower at 3574 Pinto Drive in Medina, MN 50 B. Resolution No. 2016-02 Accepting Resignation of Robin Reid from the Park 51 Commission Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 January 19, 2016 i C. Resolution No. 2016-03 Delegating to City Clerk Authority to Acknowledge 2 or Deny Exempted Lawful Gambling Applications 3 D. Resolution No. 2016-04 Granting Preliminary and Final Plat Approval for 4 Bradford Creek Addition 5 E. Resolution No. 2016-05 Vacating a Portion of the Palm Street Right -of -Way 6 Adjacent to Proposed Plat of Bradford Creek Addition 7 F. Approve Development Agreement By and Between the City of Medina and 8 Susan M. Prodahl, Carl W. Henderson and Paul B. Henderson Regarding 9 Bradford Creek Addition 10 G. Ordinance No. 594 Amending the Official Zoning Map to Rezone Property at 11 45 Highway 55 12 H. Resolution No. 2016-06 Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance Amending 13 the Official Zoning Map to Rezone Property at 45 Highway 55 by Title and 14 Summary 15 I. Call for Special Meeting on March 24, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. to Conduct a 16 Business Forum and Business Tours 17 J. Approve Owner's Representative Agreement with Advocates for Owners 18 Consultants dba AFO Consultants 19 K. Approve Contract for Architectural Services with 292 Design Group 20 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Anderson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 21 passed unanimously. 22 23 VI. COMMENTS (7:08 p.m.) 24 25 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 26 There were none. 27 28 B. Park Commission 29 Scherer reported that the Park Commission will be meeting the following night to discuss 30 the Stonegate Farms trail alignment and will also hold a brainstorming and goal setting 31 session. 32 33 C. Planning Commission 34 Planning Commissioner Albers reported that the Planning Commission met the previous 35 week to request for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for Hamel Brewing at 22 36 Hamel Road, noting that the Commission recommended approval based on the 37 conditions suggested by staff. He advised that the Commission also welcomed two 38 newly appointed members, Robin Reid and Chris Barry, who replaced Commissioners 39 Nolan and Williams. He stated that the Commission appointed Victoria Reid as 40 Chairperson and Janet White as Vice Chairperson. He stated that the Commission 41 reviewed information from the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, specifically the 42 vision statement and goals, noting that the direction was for the Commissioners to log 43 into the "my sidewalk" portion of the City website with specific comments. 44 45 Pederson referenced the Hamel Brewing request and asked if there was discussion 46 regarding parking, specifically whether shared parking could be obtained from the 47 neighboring VFW. 48 49 Albers stated that parking was discussed at length, noting that there was a concern with 50 the number of spaces included in the application and the number desired for peek use in 51 the summer. He stated that there was discussion with the applicant to determine if a Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 January 19, 2016 I shared parking agreement could be obtained. He explained that ultimately the 2 Commission believed that the parking would be adequate in the Uptown Hamel area 3 because of the peak hours of operation. 4 5 VII. PRESENTATIONS 6 7 A. Representative Jerry Hertaus (7:13 p.m.) 8 Representative Jerry Hertaus reported that the session will start on March 8th and stated 9 that the shorter session will be a challenge, noting the construction that is occurring in 10 St. Paul at the Capitol. He stated that there was some uncomplete business at the end 11 of the last session, as the Tax Bill and Transportation Bill were unresolved and will be 12 picked up again during this next session. He stated that he serves on the K12 Education 13 Committee and provided an update on the activity that occurred on the Education Bill 14 during the last session and during the special session that took place. He provided a 15 brief summary of activity in the budget and reserves noting that the biannual fiscal year 16 will end this June. He stated that a Highway 12 Working Coalition has been established 17 because of the crashes that occur in the most rural segment of the highway, noting that 18 is the most dangerous stretch of highway in the State at this time. He stated that the 19 session will be ten weeks long and the bills will start on March 8th 20 21 Anderson thanked Representative Hertaus for his continued representation. 22 23 Representative Hertaus referenced an e-mail he received from Johnson in regard to a 24 letter from former Mayor Weir concerning State Statute 273.117. He stated that there is 25 no financial incentive to place land into a conservation easement. He explained that 26 Minnesota has the most complicated and convoluted property tax system and advised 27 that they are working to simplify the process and reduce the number of classifications of 28 property. He stated that if a number of residents were to place land into conservation 29 easements to avoid paying taxes on the land that would shift the burden of taxes to the 30 remaining residents. He was optimistic that some reforms could be made to the property 31 tax levy system. 32 33 Mitchell stated that he was on the Council years ago when 394 was originally designed 34 to go further through the communities in this area. He stated that was not done and 35 perhaps that is a reason for the increased safety issues on Highway 12. He stated that 36 he likes the idea of continuing bonding, even in a surplus, in order to spread that across 37 future years as well. He stated that in reference to the surplus he would like to see that 38 spent on capital improvement projects, such as the Highway 12 improvements, noting 39 that every city has a wish list of things they would like done. He hoped that funds could 40 be spread equally and fairly. 41 42 Representative Hertaus stated that the total amount of bonding has been close to 43 $1,000,000,000 each biennium and provided additional information. He stated that there 44 is a bonding limit, which is fixed at about $8,000,000,000 and advised that the State is at 45 about $6,500,000,000 of that limit. He believed that the Transportation Bill would be a 46 combination of bonding and fixed funds. 47 48 Mitchell referenced the issue of conservation easements and stated that there are ways 49 to reduce taxes on real estate through agricultural preserve and green acres. He 50 explained that in some cases of conservation easements, the issue is not property tax Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 January 19, 2016 1 but the income tax deduction for making a charitable gift. He stated that he understands 2 both sides of the argument and noted that it is a complicated issue. 3 4 Representative Hertaus stated that he owns a large tract of land in Greenfield and while 5 he would like the discounted valuation he understands that the value will remain in his 6 property for the time when he is no longer the steward. He stated that developers 7 understand that greenspace adds to value to the property and to the value of the homes 8 they build. 9 10 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 11 12 A. Michael Vickerman — Right -of -Way Vacation — Portions of Ash Street 13 Adjacent to 2982 Lakeshore Avenue — Public Hearing (7:34 p.m.) 14 Johnson stated that Vickerman is requesting a right-of-way vacation for a portion of Ash 15 Street adjacent to a home he is purchasing at 2983 Lakeshore Avenue. 16 17 Finke presented the request from Vickerman noting that the applicant would like to build 18 a garage addition and advised that a 30-foot setback from the right-of-way would be 19 required. He stated that this development was platted in the 1920's with wetlands in the 20 right-of-way, which is why the road has not been improved. He provided an aerial 21 photograph of the area, highlighting the subject property area. He stated that there are 22 no improvements to the proposed right-of-way, noting that a number of the lots in that 23 neighborhood actually front onto Pine Street. He advised that there is no existing street 24 in the right-of-way area but noted that there is a stormwater improvement in the right-of- 25 way. He stated that staff believes that there is potential future use of the right-of-way for 26 utilities and trails but street use is very unlikely and therefore does not oppose the 27 vacation if replacement easements are granted. He noted that the applicant is willing to 28 extend the easements desired. He stated that perhaps additional right-of-way could be 29 obtained along Lakeshore Avenue and Pine Street as that would provide more flexibility 30 for future improvements on those roadways. He stated that staff could not find any 31 formal record for the lots being combined. He stated that typically the City requests that 32 the lots be combined and the applicant does not oppose that action, and noted that the 33 resolution has been amended to include that action as well. 34 35 Mitchell referenced the land survey and the request for additional right-of-way on 36 Lakeshore and Pine, asking for additional information. 37 38 Finke provided additional information on the existing right-of-way for those roadways and 39 stated that staff would recommend an additional five feet of right-of-way for each 40 roadway in order to provide more flexibility for future road improvements. He referenced 41 similar situations in which the City has vacated right-of-way on one front of the property 42 and taken additional right-of-way on the other front of the property, which abuts a more 43 used roadway. 44 45 Cousineau asked staff to identify the areas where additional right-of-way would be 46 requested. 47 48 Finke highlighted the area and noted that any additional roadway in that area would be 49 helpful for future road projects. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 January 19, 2016 1 Scherer agreed that the additional right-of-way on those roadways would be helpful for 2 future roadway projects. 3 4 The consensus of the Council was to request the additional right-of-way on Lakeshore 5 Avenue and Pine Street. 6 7 Finke suggested amending a condition of the resolution to state "...and additional right- 8 of -way for the streets of Lakeshore and Pine as recommended by the City Engineer." 9 10 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. 11 12 No comments made. 13 14 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. 15 16 Mitchell asked if the Council desires to vacate the portion of Ash Street requested. 17 18 1. Resolution No. 2016-07 Vacating a Portion of the Ash Street Right-of- 19 Way Adjacent to 2982 Lakeshore Avenue 20 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to Adopt Resolution No. 2016-07 Approving a 21 Lot Combination of 2982 Lakeshore Avenue and Approving the Vacation of a Portion of 22 the adjacent Ash Street Right -of -Way, further stating that the vacation would be 23 conditioned upon obtaining an additional five feet of right-of-way along Lakeshore 24 Avenue and Pine Street as recommended by the City Engineer. Motion passed 25 unanimously. 26 27 B. Update on Comprehensive Plan Update Process (7:47 p.m.) 28 Finke stated that there was a discussion regarding the vision statement and goals by the 29 Planning Commission at their last meeting, specifically regarding the language used. He 30 stated that at this point in the process the point is not to miss anything goal related or 31 that is desired, noting that the language can be tweaked and amended along the 32 process. He stated that the information is posted on the "my sidewalk" portion of the 33 City website as well and comments can be submitted via that format. 34 35 Martin stated that through this process the Committee has been working in a vacuum 36 that was created in order to not "recreate the wheel" and stated that the decision has 37 been made instead to refocus on the existing Comprehensive Plan, as that will be less 38 time consuming and more thoughtful discussion can occur. 39 40 Anderson agreed that the existing Plan was well written and should be used as a starting 41 point. 42 43 Mitchell noted that the City is only five years into the ten-year Plan; therefore, the 44 concepts are not out of date. 45 46 Martin stated that a lot of attention has been spent on the one community concept, as 47 there is a continued frustration between the divide between north and south as the City 48 is bisected by Highway 55, is split between multiple school districts, and is more 49 developed in some areas than others. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 January 19, 2016 1 Mitchell referenced the diagram, which shows the City and neighboring communities 2 noting the physically small size of neighboring communities. 3 4 Cousineau stated that she likes the direction of the Committee to now use the existing 5 Plan as a starting point for future discussions as that Plan is well written. 6 7 Martin asked for input on not just the Plan and vision but tools for implementation to 8 keep what the City has north of Highway 55, not sacrificing that land for development. 9 10 Finke stated that the forecasts from the Metropolitan Council have decreased and 11 therefore some of the numbers can be reduced as well. 12 13 The Council further discussed some future development, infrastructure needs, and 14 whether the MUSA line would need to be moved. 15 16 C. Wellhouse No. 3 Addition Project (8:09 p.m.) 17 Johnson stated that this item is in reference to the Well No. 8 project, noting that the 18 original cost projection was lower due to an adjustment in the project scope and 19 therefore staff is attempting to determine if the existing infrastructure could be upgraded, 20 noting that Well No. 3 could provide additional needed capacity. 21 22 Scherer stated that staff is seeking approval of the Well House No. 3 plan approval and 23 bid. He stated that the original plan was approved on May 6, 2014 and reviewed the 24 process since that time which included drilling a test and production well. He stated that 25 with these plans the well would provide 2/3 more the capacity of the original well and 26 would serve the City's needs. He stated that in the estimate there are a few things that 27 have already been installed into the project and staff will review the list. He stated that 28 staff is asking for general approval for the plans and specifications, noting that staff will 29 work out the minor details before putting the project out for bid. 30 31 Anderson asked for additional information on the future expenditures and total project 32 cost. 33 34 Scherer provided clarification on funds that have already been spent for the project, 35 future expenditures and the total project cost. 36 37 1. Resolution No. 2016-08 Approving Plans and Specifications and 38 Ordering Advertisement of Bids for Public Improvements 39 Associated with the Medina Wellhouse No. 3 Addition 40 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to Adopt Resolution No. 2016-08 Approving 41 Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Public Improvement 42 Associated with the Medina Wellhouse No. 3 Addition. Motion passed unanimously. 43 44 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:18 p.m.) 45 Johnson had nothing further to report. 46 47 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:18 p.m.) 48 Martin stated that she appreciates the department updates. She provided an update on 49 the Mayor's meeting she attended the previous week, noting that there was a roundtable 50 discussion to talk about innovation, development, and issues facing communities. She 51 stated that cities were attempting to keep rural character in their communities as they Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 January 19, 2016 I develop. They also discussed development of downtown areas. She stated that of all 2 the communities represented she got the impression that the City is one of the best 3 administratively run communities. 4 5 Scherer stated that he would need clarification regarding the fee schedule for the clean- 6 up day event in April. He asked for direction on whether the trees would continue to be 7 subsidized, noting that the trees are very popular and staff is going to look for another 8 supplier. He believed the subsidy amount would be $2,500, which allows the City to sell 9 the trees at half price. 10 11 Martin stated that she would support additional funds from the tree fund as this is a 12 community event and the trees provide benefit to the community. 13 14 Scherer stated that the residents should have some buy in because it ensures that they 15 will take better care of the trees. 16 17 Xl. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:23 p.m.) 18 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the bills, EFT 003481 E- 19 003508E for $79,098.07, order check numbers 43836-43914 for $294,812.87, and 20 payroll EFT 506902-506932 for $49,172.99. Motion passed unanimously. 21 22 XII. ADJOURN 23 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:24 p.m. 24 Motion passed unanimously. 25 26 27 28 29 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 30 Attest: 31 32 33 Scott Johnson, City Administrator Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 January 19, 2016 Pitney Bores WSCA/NASPO FMV Lease Option C Agreement Account # 10 Your Business Information CITY OF MEDINA I I I Agreement Number Full Legal Name of Customer 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 Billing Address: Street DBA Name of Customer Tax ID # (FEIN/TIN) MEDINA MN 55340-9790 City State Zip+4 () ext 00700509003 Billing Contact Name 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 Billing Contact Phone # Billing CAN # MEDINA MN 55340-9790 Installation Address (If different from billing address): Street City State Zip+4 () ext 00700509003 Installation Contact Name Installation Contact Phone # Installation CAN # Fiscal Period (from - to) Your Business Needs Customer PO # Delivery CAN # Qty 1 Business Solution Description Mail Stream Solution - 1 DM400C Digital Meter System 1 IntelliLink Interface / PSD for DM300C/ DM400C/DM450C 1 Basic Accounting (50 Accounts) 1 70 LPM Feature 1 2 lb Integrated Weighing 1 Integrated Weighing Platform 1 pbSmartPostage Free 1 IntelliLink Subscription Your Payment Plan Number Of Months Check items to be included in customer's payment ❑x Equipment Maintenance(Included with your payments for the initial term) Provides service coverage including certain parts and labor ❑ Software Maintenance (1st year included) Provides revision updates and technical assistance O Soft -Guard® Subscription (Included with your meter rental) Provides postal and carrier updates x IntelliLink® Subscription/Meter Rental Provides simplified billing and includes ( )resets per year ( ) Confirmation Services Electronic access to postal confirmation service ( ) Purchase Power® Receive an invoice for postage,consolidated billin and enhanced management reporting information. Monthly Amount * First 48 (*Does not include any applicable taxes $126.98 ( ) Required advance check of $( ) received Tax Exempt# State Tax Of applicable) ( ) Tax Exempt Certificate Attached ( ) Tax Exempt Certificate Not Required Your Signature Below By signing below, you agree to be bound by this FMV Lease Option C Agreement (this "Lease"). This Lease is made and entered into pursuant to your State's/Entity's Participating Addendum, which is made in connection with the WSCA/NASPO Contract # ADSPO11-00000411-7 ("Agreements"), all of which are available at www.pb.com/states. The terms and conditions of the Agreements govern this transaction, and in the event of any inconsistency with this Lease, the Agreements will supersede this Lease. This Lease will be binding on PBGFS only after PBGFS has completed its credit and documentation approval process and an authorized PBGFS employee signs below. 48227 Customer Signature Date State's/Entity's Participating Addendum # Print Name Sales Information GEORGE, KELLY J Title Email Address 000 Account Rep Name Equipment Vendor: Pitney Bowes Inc. for Sales and Service call 1-800-322-8000 {C0174883.2} District Office PBGFS Acceptance Page 1 See www.pb.com/states for additional terms and conditions WSCA / NASPO FMV Lease Option C Agreement (Version 3/13) ©2012 Pitney Bowes Inc. All rights reserved. Pitney Bowes Soft -Guard, IntelliLink and Purchase Power are registered trademarks owned by Pitney Bowes Inc. Agenda Item # 5D Goal Setting Session Work Plan to Accomplish 2016 City Goals and Initiatives Goal/Initiative Responsible Facilitatortsj Timeline for Priority Completion Notes Completion Public Works Goals 1. Cottonwood Trail Road Project - Infiltration Basin Public Works Director 4th Quarter High 2. Work to fulfill MS-4 permit requirements Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 3. Complete Stormwater Maintenance Policy Public Works Director 1st Quarter Moderate 4. Comanche Trail Overlay Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 5. Lakeview Road Overlay Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 6. Sioux Drive Turn Lane Project Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 7. Land acquisition and design of 55/116 Intersection Project for 2017 Public Works Director On -going High 8. Continue to implement and update the Pavement Management Plan and re-evaluate some of the scheduled projects Public Works Director On -going High 9. Bring forward a concept plan and budget for parking and spectator area in the northeast comer of Hamel Legion Park Public Works Director 2nd Quarter Moderate 10. Negotiate land purchase adjacent to Tomann Preserve Public Works Director 1st Quarter Moderate 11. Arrowhead Trail Public Works Director 3rd Quarter Moderate 12. Continue implementation of Wellhead Protection Plan Part II Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 13. Loretto Sewer - continue to work with MCES and the neighboring cities on long term and interim service plan to resolve phosphorus loading issue Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 14. Complete wellhouse #3 modifications and installation of well #8 Public Works Director 3rd Quarter Moderate 15. Clean and document the location and condition of all City water valves Public Works Director 4th Quarter Moderate 16. Work with Engineer to complete design of water and sewer infrastructure for 55/116 project Public Works Director 4th Quarter High 17. Complete water tower rehab project Public Works Director 3rd Quarter High 18. Continue with the paving of the Public Works/Police parking lot Public Works Director 4th Quarter Moderate Public Safety Goals 1. Provide Top Quality Service to our Citizens Police Chief On -going High 2. Start to Develop Critical Incident Plans with our Businesses Police Chief 4th Quarter High 3. Implement New Training Software Police Chief 1st Quarter High 4. Complete the Hamel and Loretto Fire Contracts Police Chief 4th Quarter High 5. Update Active Shooter Training Police Chief 2nd Quarter Moderate 6. Bi-Annual Update of the Medina Police Policy Police Chief 3rd Quarter High 7. Improve Traffic Safety with Electronic Signs Police Chief 3rd Quarter Moderate 8. Build Community Relations with New Residents Police Chief On -going High Finance Department Goals 1. Redistribute finance tasks between current and new finance staff Finance Director 2nd Quarter High 2. Watershed Fee on utility bill Finance Director 1st Quarter High 3. Explore pros/cons of excluding renters from utility bills and billing the owner Finance Director 3rd Quarter High 4. Cross -train Finance staff Finance Director On -going High Agenda Item # 5D Planning/Zoning Department Goals 1. Comprehensive Plan Update City Planner On -going High 2. City Hall Space Planning/Renovation/Moving City Planner 4th Quarter High 3. Records Management - Laserfiche City Planner On -going High 4. MSA Analysis City Planner 3rd Quarter High Administration/General Goals 1. Implement electronic City Council Packets and purchase tablets for 2 Council Members City Administrator 2nd Quarter High 2. Work with Hennepin County and MNDOT to plan and budget appropriately for the Highway 55/116 intersection project in 2017 City Administrator 4th Quarter High 3. Hold a business forum and two business tours of three businesses in 2016 City Administrator 2nd & 4th Quarter High 4. Implementation of Laserfiche in the Finance, Administration and Planning Departments. City Administrator On -going Moderate 5. Health Insurance for 2017 - Continueto serve on LOGIS committee and look into options to provide cost effective insurance coverage City Administrator 3rd Quarter High 6. Complete renovations at City Hall City Administrator 4th Quarter High 7. Implement a -poll books for 2016 Elections City Administrator 3rd Quarter High 8. Monitor and implement changes for absentee voting for 2016 Elections City Administrator 3rd Quarter High TOTAL GOALS/INITIATIVES FOR 2016: 42 Agenda Item # 7A MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Medina City Council through City Administrator Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator January 26, 2016 Randy's Garbage Rate Increase Request Background The City of Medina has a contract with Randy's Environmental Services to provide organized garbage, recycling, and organics collection to the single family homes within Medina. The City of Medina has had organized collection and a contract for waste and recycling services since 1986. Organized collection was initiated to minimize truck traffic and damage on Medina's roads and to ensure that waste was managed environmentally to reduce the need for landfills. On January 3, 2013, the City Council approved the current five year license agreement with an auto -renewal clause for an additional five years with Randy's Environmental Services. The agreement allows for Randy's to request up to a 3% CPI increase in years 3, 5, 7, and 9 of the contract. The City Council approved Randy's requested 1.9% CPI increase on September 2, 2014 for the 2015 and 2016 contract years. Contract Years Year 3 — 2015 Year 5 — 2017 Year 7 — 2019 Year 9 - 2021 Request from Randy's Environmental Services Randy's Environmental Services is asking for a $0.75 per month per household rate increase on the garbage portion of residents' bills. This increase is not authorized under the current agreement, but they have still requested to come before the City Council to ask for the increase due to the increase they are being required to pay in tipping fees for the disposal of Municipal Solid Waste. Increased Cost to Haulers for Waste Disposal The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is now beginning to enforce the "Restriction on Disposal Statute" (MN Statute 473.848), which prohibits haulers from disposing of solid waste at a landfill, unless all waste processing facilities (waste -to -energy facilities) have reached their maximum capacity. The Statute was written to divert as much waste as possible from the landfills. The three waste processing facilities also all increased their rates this year. On January 1, 2016, Hennepin County implemented a new tipping fee for garbage delivered to the county. The new rate is $55/ton, an increase of 12% over the previous rate of $49/ton. According to Hennepin County, an average household generates about one ton of trash per year, which means the $6 increase equates to an additional 50 cents per month. To the right is a chart of Hennepin County's tipping fee rates over the past 10 years. Hennepin County Tipping Fees 2016: $55/ton 2015: $49 2014: $49 2013: $47 2012: $47 2011: $45 2010: $40 2009: $38 2008: $36 2007: $34 Staff questioned Randy's Environmental services on the requested 75 cents per month increase since Hennepin County's math showed a 50 cent per month increase should cover the costs. Randy's responded stating that Hennepin County has placed tonnage restrictions on the amount of waste they will accept and the actual tipping rate increase is $9.00 across the three facilities. Staff spoke with Hennepin County and they confirmed that public entity waste generated in the county will be managed in the highest ranked manner according to the waste management hierarchy described in MN Statute 115A.02. Therefore, Hennepin County anticipates that Public Entity Waste generated in Hennepin County will be delivered to the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC) or the Brooklyn Park Transfer Station for processing. The Environment and Energy department will ensure that processing capacity at HERC is available for Public Entity Waste. The 2016 tipping fee at HERC is $55 per ton. Staff will be meeting with Randy's Environmental Services on Monday, February 1st to further discuss their request. We will provide the City Council with any updated information at the meeting. Attachments 1. Rate Increase Request from Randy's (email) 2. Letters (2) from Hennepin County to Haulers on Tipping Fee Increase 3. Letter from Randy's to Customers (in open market) Explaining Rate Increase 4. Letter from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Haulers 5. Email from Hennepin County to Cities Explaining Tipping Fee Increase 6. License Agreement for Solid Waste between Randy's and City of Medina 7. CPI Increase Request from 2014 Jodi Gallup From: Deb Gatz <dgatz@randyssanitation.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 9:40 AM To: Jodi Gallup Subject: MPCA to enforce the Restriction on Disposal Statute (MN Statute 473.848) Attachments: Henn Waste Delivery Agreem Ltr_Disposal.pdf Good Morning Jodi Happy New Year. Starting in January 2016 all disposal facilities are increasing the rate on the disposal of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). Randy's would like to ask that this increase in government fee be passed to the residents in the form of a rate increase on the trash portion of billing. The increase we will be asking for is $.75 per month per household. May we ask to be put on an agenda to present to council if need be. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Deb Gatz Company Operations Administrator Randy's Environmental Services Direct Dial 763-972-4119 Cell 612-916-6871 E Nivin.GFM M'E N TA L SEf:VICES d 1 Public kAlorks ........_ - . - -- ....__.._ _. -- - - - _ _ — - --- - u_ F3c1E''ic. 6 612-348-3/77, Phone 701 Fourth Avenue: South, Suite 700 5 2-3 i-8• 8532, Fa:: i✓iinneapoiis, Mil 55415- 842 www.hennepin.us/environmeni: December 4, 2015 Bear Hauler: On December 1, 2015 the Hennepin county F oard voted "to authorize staff to enter into two year waste delivery agreements for the delivery of waste to Hennepin County facilities. The board approved a tipping fee of $55 per ton that will take effect on January 1, 2016. The board also authorized staff to establish waste delivery limits for all haulers with waste delivery agreements to reduce the amount of excess waste that the county manages above MEI; C's annual permitted capacity of 365,000 tons. The hauler waste delivery limit constitutes a 12 percent reduction in tons for all haulers based on deliveries into the count-y's Solid Waste System -from the past 12 month period (December 1, 2014 —November 30, 2015). The board also approved a tipping fee of $05 per ton for all tons above haulers maximum delivery amounts. For example, if hauler A has a waste delivery limit of 1,000 tons, the tipping fee for the first 1,000 tons would be $55 and the tipping fee for tons above 1,000 would be $85 per ton. Maulers can choose to deliver waste above their maximum delivery amount and pay the $05 per ton tipping fee. The $85 charge covers the county's costs of transporting and managing excess waste. Maulers that delivered more than 5,000 tons during the past twelve month period will have monthly maximum delivery limits. The tipping fee for tons above the established "maximum delivery amounts" will be assessed quarterly, based on the total amount of tons delivered during the quarter. The regular tipping fee of $55 per ton will continue to be billed monthly. Your proposed waste delivery agreement is included, please sign and return both copies to Marc Artmann by December 18, 2015. If you have any questions, please contact Randy Kiser at 612 340-5889, or email Randy at Rancly.KiseKko.heirri.-i'i Regards Dave McNary Assistant Director An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper Hennepin County Public Works Environment and Energy Department 301 Fourth Avenue- South, Suite 7 Ct W7.—r,eava is, 5.541S.4.18.42 December 8, 20 [5 612-34S-3777, Pnone 612-348.S532, Fax The tipping fee for all I ter repi:ri County contract waste received a€ Brooklyn Park. Transfer Station and l let -hatpin Energy Recovery Cetiter (11ERC) wilt Sb.00 per :ova ► ti January I:, 2015. Also; due =a the state enforcement cif Minnesota Statute 473_848, which requires waste generated in the metropolitan area t4 be directed to a processing facility, i lermepin County will charge an additional S30.00 per ton for waste del it-t S that needs to be sent by the Cou.nry m an alternative processing yitern, such as Great River. Energy in Ells Ritter or die Ramsey:Washington processing #"acidity NeWpart.. Fiease call pie (.512) 34g-5889 with any uestions, anii thank yob for your su processing in liennepin County. Randy baser Supervising Environ et l.3t Solid Wage Division fmrt for waste 4351 US Hwy 12 SE PO Box 169 Delano MN 55328-0169 December 14, 2015 Dear Customer, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES o4Q4a®a liar°° www.RandysSanitation.com Phone: 763.972.3335 Fax: 763.972.6042 First of all, we would like to Thank You for being a Randy's customer. Randy, Sandy, their family, and an additional 200+ employees work hard every day to provide you with worry -free service that you can rely on every week. Behind the scenes, we work in a highly regulated industry. We strive to provide you the lowest cost while supporting waste -to - energy disposal facilities and using landfills when that disposal option is the best one available to control your costs. Today we are writing to inform you of a significant change in the waste industry that will be affecting homes and businesses in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area beginning January 1, 2016. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has recently informed all waste haulers that they will begin to enforce the "Restriction on Disposal Statute" (MN Statute 473.848). Please see a copy of the MPCA's letter on the reverse side of this letter. This Statute prohibits haulers from disposing of solid waste at a landfill, unless all waste processing facilities (waste -to -energy facilities) have reached their maximum capacity. The Statute was written with the intent of diverting as much waste as possible from the landfills in Minnesota. Landfills have a limited amount of space available. When they fill up, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency either needs to allow an expansion of that landfill or look to permit a new landfill. The net result of enforcing the Restriction on Disposal Statute will be the diversion of an additional 100,000 tons of waste from the landfills, but at the same time it takes away each haulers ability to deliver waste to the disposal facility that makes the most economical sense for their operation. Instead, the metro haulers will now be required to dispose of their waste at the three waste processing facilities currently operating in the Metropolitan Area (Hennepin Energy Recovery Center in Minneapolis, Great River Energy in Elk River, and the Ramsey/Washington Recycling & Energy Board in Newport). The Waste Processing Facilities are currently significantly more expensive than landfills, and furthermore each Processing Facility has recently announced that they will be raising their rates even higher effective January 1", 2016. This comes at a time when haulers are required to deliver them substantially more waste than we have in the past. The net result is increased disposal costs for homes and businesses across the board. Below we have provided a cost analysis to illustrate the rate increases at each processing facility and the drastic difference when compared to disposal pricing at state -approved landfills. Keep in mind Ramsey, Washington, and Hennepin Counties have a solid waste tax that is currently added to your bill each month. Ramsey/Washington Recycling & Energy Board (Newport, MN) - This facility is raising their disposal fee by 26.08% effective Jan. 1". Their new disposal fee is 29.7% above what we currently pay on average at state -approved landfills. Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (Minneapolis, MN) - This facility is raising their disposal fee by 19.6% effective January 1'. Their new blended disposal fee is 31% above what we currently pay on average at state -approved landfills. Great River Energy (Elk River, MN) - This facility is raising their disposal fee by 17.18% effective January 1". Their new disposal fee is 67.7% above what we currently pay on average at state -approved landfills. As you can see, this State Mandate has created for a significant increase in disposal costs, and we are left with no choice but to pass thru the added disposal expense to our customers in the base rates we charge for providing services effective January 1', 2016. Please don't hesitate to contact us at (763)972-3335 with any questions or concerns. We would be happy to discuss this with you further. We sincerely appreciate your business. Sincerely, Randy's Environmental Services Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 1651-296-6300 800-657-3864 I 651-282-5332 TTV I www.pca.state.mn.us I Equal Opportunity Employer October 19, 2015 Randy's Environmental Services PO Box 169 Delano, MN 55328 The purpose of this letter is to give you and all licensed waste haulers a status update on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) efforts to implement and enforce the Restriction on Disposal (ROD) statute (Minn. Stat. § 473.848). The MPCA has amended affected facility permits and will begin enforcing ROD through those landfill permits beginning January 1, 2016. This restriction applies to mixed municipal solid waste (MMSW) generated in the Metropolitan Area.* Waste facilities may be calling upon you to help them obtain compliance with this law. The compliance framework through facility permits does not directly regulate waste haulers. The purpose of the law is to assure that all landfills in Minnesota that accept MMSW generated in the Metropolitan Area such as Elk River, Burnsville, Spruce Ridge and Pine Bend do not accept for disposal waste that could be processed. MMSW resource recovery facilities (processing) available to metropolitan waste haulers include Hennepin Energy Resource Company, Resource Recovery Technologies in Newport, Great River Energy in Elk River, and the City of Red Wing. Facilities subject to ROD have permits or enforceable agreements that require compliance with the Restriction on Disposal statute. The goal of the law is to assure that MMSW does not bypass resource recovery facilities and go directly to landfills unless there is no capacity reasonably available to process MMSW. This law maximizes the recovery of materials and energy from waste, conserves landfill capacity, and helps protect the environment. Thank you in advance for your help and cooperation. If you have questions about the Restriction on Disposal, please call Sigurd Scheurle at the MPCA. His telephone number is 612-669-1377. Sinc David J. B Division Director Resource Management & Assistance Division *Metropolitan Area means the area over which the Metropolitan Council has jurisdiction, including only the Counties of Anoka; Carver; Dakota excluding the City of Northfield; Hennepin excluding the cities of Hanover and Rockford; Scott excluding the city of New Prague; and Washington. Jodi Gallup From: Ben Knudson <Ben.Knudson@hennepin.us> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 1:55 PM To: Ben Knudson Subject: Tipping Fee Increase at HERC Hello city recycling coordinators. On January 1, 2016, a new tipping fee went into effect for trash delivered to the county (HERC or the Brooklyn Park Transfer Station). The new contract rate is $55/ton, an increase of 12% over the previous rate of $49/ton. Haulers will likely pass through the cost of this increase. An average household generates about one ton of trash per year, which means the $6 increase equates to an additional 50 cents per month. Starting this year the county will also closely manage how much waste is delivered into our system, to make sure we don't receive an excessive amount of trash. This wasn't a concern in the past when landfills and waste processing facilities competed for tons, but the dynamics have changed now that the Pollution Control Agency is enforcing the state statute that prioritizes processing. If you're interested in the details, feel free to contact me. One more thing... it's important to remember the environmental benefits of waste processing compared to landfilling, which include: • More energy generation (electricity and steam) • Recovery of scrap metal • Fewer greenhouse gas emissions • Less trash landfilled These benefits are particularly relevant given the costs and hazards associated with landfilling, which have been highlighted in recent Star Tribune articles (links below). And of course, we should strive to do more at the top of the waste management hierarchy: reduce, reuse, recycle, organics. Star Tribune articles Superfund cleanup process begins at Freeway Freeway Landfill cleanup costs could balloon "The state has spent months negotiating with the landfill owner in hopes of avoiding the EPA's Superfund cleanup process. That process would likely involve protracted lawsuits as the EPA tries to recover costs from companies and municipalities that used the landfill, local government officials said. Officials expect that those legal expenses will make the EPA's cleanup far more expensive than the state's $64.4 million plan to fix the site." Ben Knudson Hennepin County Environment and Energy Department 701 Fourth Ave S, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612-596-1176 Ben.Knudson@hennepin.us Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. i CITY OF MEDINA LICENSE FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE, RECYCLABLES, AND COMPOSTABLES 1. License Granted. This license ("License") is granted this 3rd day of January, 2013, by the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City") to Randy's Sanitation, Inc. (dba Randy's Environmental Services), (the "Hauler"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.94. This License supersedes all other licenses and agreements between the City and the Hauler. The Hauler represents and warrants that it or its subsidiaries are legally entitled to perform the duties of the Hauler described or intended by this License and that in carrying out those duties it will not be in violation of any Hennepin County, City, or State of Minnesota ordinance, rule, statute or regulation. 2. Purpose of License.. The purpose of this License is to provide for the exclusive residential, .as that term is defined in Section 3 of this License, collection and disposal of mixed municipal solid waste as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.03, subd. 21, and Minnesota Rules 7035.0300, subp. 100, as further limited by Sections 3 and 5 of this License ("Solid Waste"); of source separated recyclable materials as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.03, subd. 25a and 32b, and Minnesota Rules 7035.0300, subp. 87a, as further limited by Sections 3 and 6 of this License ("Recyclables"); and of source separated compostable materials as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.03, subd. 32a, as further limited by Section 3 of this License ("Compostables") in the City in Areas 1, 2, and 3 as depicted on Exhibit A in a timely, orderly and economical fashion that complies with the statutes and policies of Minnesota, the directives of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the policies and ordinances of Hennepin County. The statutes, ordinances, goals and policies include, but are not limited to: a. the abatement of the use of landfills for unprocessed waste; b. reduction in the amount of waste generated; c. separation and recovery of materials and energy from waste; d. reduction in indiscriminate dependence on disposal of waste; e. coordination of solid waste management among political subdivisions; f. orderly and deliberate development and financial security of waste, recyclable, and composting facilities; g. compliance with Hennepin County Ordinance Nos. 2, 15 & 17; h. conformance to the Hennepin County Solid Waste Management Master Plan 2005-2024; i. compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115A; and j. compliance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7035. 3. Scope of the License. Subd. 1. Residential Limitation. This License applies to residential dwellings and complexes with four residential units or less ("Residential" or "Residences"). This License is not applicable to residential dwelling units and complexes with more than four residential units and those that combine their Solid Waste in a dumpster with commercial operations on the same premises. It is the responsibility of the City to maintain an 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 1 accurate list of Residences, and it is the responsibility of the Hauler to keep an accurate list of customers. Subd. 2. Solid Waste. The Hauler shall provide weekly Solid Waste collection services for all Residences in the City on Wednesday of each week and dispose of the Solid Waste in accordance with all applicable government regulations, goals, policies and permits. Subd. 3. Recyclables. The Hauler shall provide bi-weekly, single -sort Recyclables collection services for all Residences in the City on Wednesdays. The Hauler shall process the Recyclables at the Hauler's recycling facility in accordance with all applicable government regulations, goals, policies and permits. Subd. 4. Compostables. The Hauler shall provide Compostables collection services (aka Blue Bag Organics) for all Residences in the City on Wednesday of each week. The Hauler shall process the Compostables in accordance with all applicable government regulations, goals, policies and permits. The City may opt to change compostable collection services to a subscription basis for its Residences at the end of any calendar year. Subd. 5. Collection Services. Solid Waste, Recyclables, and Compostables collection services described in this Section, hereinafter collectively and generally referred to as "Collection" or "Collections" unless otherwise described or limited. Subd. 6. Service Area. The municipal boundaries and service area are depicted in Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3 on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. Rates. During the term of this License, the Hauler shall charge Collection rates according to the schedule attached as Exhibit B. The Hauler may propose a CPI rate increase, but no more than 3% in years 3 and 5 of this license and in years 7 and 9 of this license if the license is extended. In the event the Hauler wishes to propose a rate increase, the Hauler shall notify the City by September 30th of the preceding year. The renegotiated Residential Collection rate shall be effective January 1st of the following calendar year. 5. Solid Waste. The Hauler shall deliver all Solid Waste to Hennepin County's resource recovery facility or transfer facility. The Hauler shall deliver Solid Waste to a site other than these county facilities only with the express written permission of the Hennepin County administrator and the City. In no event shall the Hauler manage the Solid Waste using a waste management practice that is ranked lower on the list of preferred waste management practices, specified in Minnesota Statutes, section 115A.02(b), than the waste management practice selected for Solid Waste by Hennepin County. Subd. 1. Items Refused for Pick -Up. The Hauler shall provide the City with a list of items or types of solid waste that will not be picked up, that require special preparation before being collected (e.g. paint cans, tires, etc.), or any other limits on collection. The 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 2 list of items shall not be changed without the approval of the City's designated representative to this License. Subd. 2. Notice of Non -Conforming Containers or Waste. The Hauler shall notice or tag and empty all nonconforming containers, bundles, or waste if reasonably possible. The tag shall explain the reason why the waste was not collected or why the container is non -conforming. 6. Recyclables. The Hauler shall collect the following Recyclables on a bi-weekly basis: a. Newspaper and inserts b. Cardboard boxes c. Glass food and beverage containers d. Metal food and beverage cans e. All plastic containers and lids, #1 — Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET, PETE), #2 High density Polyethylene (HDPE), #3 — Vinyl Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), #4 — Low Density Polythylene (LDPE), #5 — Polypropylene (PP) plastic bottles, #6, and #7, except those that previously contained hazardous materials or motor oil. f. Magazines and catalogs g. Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes h. Boxes from toothpaste, medications and other toiletries i. Aseptic and gable -topped containers j. Mail, office and school papers 7. Collection Restrictions. Subd. 1. Collection Day. The City may, by order of the City Council and in consultation with the Hauler, annually establish a different Collection day upon sixty (60) days notice to the Hauler. Subd. 2. Holidays. The Hauler shall not engage in Collection Services on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day. When a Collection date, as described in Section 3, falls on one of the holidays listed herein, Collection shall occur one (1) business day after the holiday. By December 1st of the preceding year, the Hauler shall annually provide the City's designated representative with the specific dates of holidays affecting service for the coming year. Subd. 3. Hours of Collection. The Collection times shall be between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on the scheduled Collection day, unless otherwise authorized by the City's designated representative. 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 3 Subd. 4. Collection Routes. The Hauler shall efficiently establish Collection routes so as to prevent damage to City's streets, roads, culverts, drainage ways and other public facilities and to private driveways within the City and to minimize the cost of Collection to City residents. Upon request by the City, the Hauler shall provide to the City's designated representative a map of the Collection routes followed by the Hauler within the City. 8. Performance Standards. The Hauler shall be responsible for program management according to the following operating and personnel standards: a. The Hauler's vehicles shall be operated in accordance with all applicable laws, ordinances, goals, and policies. b. Collection services shall be provided as described in this License unless otherwise permitted by the City's designated representative. c. The Hauler shall employ only competent and trustworthy employees and supervisors. d. The Hauler's employees and supervisors shall conduct themselves in a courteous, honest, and professional manner. The Hauler shall take immediate action to correct the behavior of any employee or supervisor who is insolent, disorderly, careless, unobservant, dishonest, or acting in any way that is detrimental. to the satisfactory progress of work under this License. e. The Hauler's employees shall be dressed in a manner that is professional and as neat and clean as circumstances permit. f. The Hauler shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in handling waste containers. Any waste spilled while emptying the containers shall be completely and immediately cleaned up by the Hauler. g. Except as otherwise provided for in this License, the Hauler shall provide and maintain suitable Collection containers at its cost. The Hauler must exercise due care in preventing damage to containers and shall replace cans in an upright position with the lids replaced or placed adjacent to the container, except during windy conditions when the containers may be laid on their side to prevent the containers from blowing away. The Hauler shall be responsible for the replacement of any containers damaged by its employees. h. The Hauler shall have at least one field supervisor dedicated to overseeing the performance of the Hauler's employees in the City. The supervisor shall familiarize himself/herself with the City and the services required under these specifications. i. The Hauler shall maintain an office and provide staff persons for the receipt of service calls and complaints. This office shall be open and available for calls, at a minimum, Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. as well as any time when the Hauler is performing services under this License. This office shall contain at least two local or toll -free telephone lines listed under the Hauler's name in the City's local telephone directory. This office shall have the ability to communicate with personnel while they perform services under this License. j. Each complaint shall be investigated by the Hauler and responded to within one (1) business day unless mutually extended by the Hauler and the complaining party. If the complaint concerns the failure of the Hauler to collect any of its 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 4 Collection Services as required by this License, the Hauler shall make the Collection by noon the following calendar day. There will be no exception to this requirement unless Collection has been altered due to a holiday listed in Section 7(2) or unforeseen circumstances and authorized by the City's designated representative. k. The City has theright to inspect all books and records of the Hauler relating to any aspect of Collection subject to this License. 1. The vehicles used for Collection should be completely enclosed, watertight body, and shall be properly designed so that the wheel and axle loads with a fully - loaded body shall not exceed the schedule of weights allowed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, Hennepin County, and the City. If it is not possible to fully load the body and stay within the limits of the law, the Hauler will be required to reduce the loads in the body until it complies with the applicable law. During the period of seasonal weight restrictions, the Hauler shall strictly comply with the vehicular weight limits posted on the streets highlighted on Exhibit C attached hereto and shall, with respect to all other streets within the City, make its best effort to reduce vehicular load weights and the number of trips in order to minimize wear and tear on all City streets. m. The Hauler's vehicles and equipment shall be painted uniformly and must be maintained in proper working order, appearance, and sanitary condition at all times. Each vehicle and piece of equipment shall include the Hauler's name and each vehicle shall be assigned a number that is prominently painted on the vehicle. n. Sufficient equipment and personnel shall be furnished by the Hauler so that Collections can be completed within one (1) calendar day. 9. Term of .License. The term of this License is for a period of five and a half years commencing on January 1, 2013, and ending on June 30, 2018. Unless this License is terminated by either party giving at least a 60 day notice, but not more than 120 days prior to the end of the initial term, this License shall be automatically extended for a period of five years, ending on June 30, 2023. 10. Billing and Collecting. It is the responsibility of the Hauler to bill and collect charges for Collections from the owner or occupant of each Residence in the City. The City bears no responsibility in that contractual relationship. 11. Collection Reporting. Subd. 1. Recyclables. The Hauler shall provide monthly documentation and reports for the total tons collected, the percentage of the total that each material type represents, and the markets used for the sale of the recyclable materials. These reporting requirements are required for the City's annual recycling report to Hennepin County. Subd. 2. Compostables. The Hauler shall provide monthly documentation and reports for the amount of material collected, recycled, and disposed. The Hauler shall also track and provide an annual report to the City by October 31 st for the following: 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 5 a. Number of households requesting compostables service, the change in garbage cart size and collection frequency b. Number of participating households that cancel compostables service c. Set out rates d. Tons of compostables diverted e. Educational activities f. Survey results of users and non -users 12. Collection Point. The Hauler agrees to Collections at the curb or at any other location upon which the Hauler and the customer mutually agree. If the Hauler, in the reasonable exercise of its judgment, determines that a driveway may sustain damage from the passage of the Hauler's vehicles, the Hauler may require a release from liability from the owner for such damage. 13. Insurance. The Hauler agrees to provide and maintain public liability insurance, including general liability, automobile liability, and loading and unloading liability, with the following minimum coverages: a. $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission and $500,000 to any claimant in any other case; b. $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence; or c. twice the limits provided in clauses a and b when the claim arises out of the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, whether the claim is brought under Minnesota Statutes, sections 115B.01 to 115B.15, or under any other law. The insurance shall be placed with insurers licensed to conduct business in the State of Minnesota, and the City shall be named as an additional insured. The Hauler shall provide a certificate of insurance to the City to demonstrate compliance with the above requirements. 14. Indemnity. The Hauler agrees to take all precautions necessary to protect the public against injury and to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless from any liability, costs of defense, claims, damages, costs, judgments, or other expenses which may arise by reason of any claim for bodily or personal injury, property damage, disease, or death resulting directly or indirectly from an act or omission of the Hauler. 15. Performance Bond. The Hauler agrees to post and maintain a performance bond in the amount of $50,000 to guarantee full compliance with the terms of this License. The City may charge any cost related to the Hauler's failure to perform the services required, against any monies due or to become due to the Hauler. 16. Accommodation of Disabled Persons. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Hauler shall provide a reasonable accommodation to disabled residents who are unable to place their Solid Waste, Recyclables, and Compostables out for Collection. Disabled residents must request a reasonable accommodation. The City will not publicize this 323167v3 MJM ME230-24 6 service but will advise the Hauler of any requests for a reasonable accommodation submitted to the City. The Hauler will determine the accommodation offered and the cost, if any, to the disabled resident based on the nature of the disability and subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The City will be provided with a copy of the Hauler's written documentation on any request for a reasonable accommodation. 17. Annual City Clean -Up. The Hauler agrees to provide up to six (6) thirty (30) yard roll off dumpsters for the City's use during its annual City Clean -Up in each year of the license.. The dates of the annual City Clean -Up will be set by the City. There will be no charge to the City except for disposal of the Solid Waste collected during the annual clean-up. 18. Public Education. The Hauler shall coordinate with the City to promote recycling, composting, and the proper disposal of Solid Waste to Residences at no charge. Public education efforts may include brochures, signs, videos, and presentations to classes and community groups. 19. City Facilities Collection. The Hauler agrees to provide at its own expense containers for the weekly collection of Solid Waste and Compostables and bi-weekly collection of Recyclables at the City facilities listed below. The Hauler shall provide containers for Collections at each of the facilities listed below and said containers shall be painted, or otherwise prepared, so that the waste may be source separated. a. b. c. d. e. f. g• h. i. j• Lakeshore Park Maple Park Morningside Park Holy Name Park Hunter Park Hamel Legion Park The Park at Fields of Medina Hamel Community Building City Hall Public Works and Police Buildings Two 95-gallon carts Two 95-gallon carts Two 95-gallon carts Two 95-gallon carts Two 95-gallon carts Five 95-gallon carts Two 95-gallon carts Two Commercial Dumpsters Two Commercial Dumpsters Two Commercial Dumpsters The Hauler shall provide document destruction service at City Hall and the Police Building at no charge to the City. 20. Emergency or Disaster Services. The Hauler shall provide, upon the request of the City, any additional collections requested and reasonably necessary during a declared emergency that endangers life or property in the City. The cost of this service will be mutually negotiated between the Hauler and the City. 21. Review Process. Each year a representative from the Hauler and the City will meet to review services and costs. 22. Revocation. This License may be revoked by the Medina City Council upon notice and hearing for failure of the Hauler to perform any material condition hereof. 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 7 23. Exclusive License. This License grants the Hauler an exclusive license to provide and offer Collections in the City. In the event the Hauler has reason to believe that other solid waste, recycling, or compostable collection haulers are operating in a manner that is contrary to this License, the Hauler must first notify the City and may take legal and appropriate steps to ensure its Collection as an exclusive license holder under the terms of this License. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 8 CITY OF MEDINA By i �YLI� T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor By �4 Scott T. Johnson , City Administrator -Clerk RANDY'S SANITATION, INC. By Its: � . By Its: 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 9 r P £ eery Z eaV G earr seaid aainJag yseJl pua6al seIIW S'6 I 9L'0 9L£'0 0 I i I ssaabr 03FUOS seal auipaw 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 Exhibit B Collection Service 35 gallon solid waste cart weekly 35 gallon solid waste cart bi-weekly with composting* 65 gallon solid waste cart weekly 65 gallon solid waste cart bi-weekly with composting* 95 gallon solid waste cart weekly 95 gallon solid waste cart bi-weekly with composting* Additional solid waste cart Single -sort recycle cart including Blue Bag Organics Single -sort recycle cart without Blue Bag Organics# Optional Grass and Leaves Pick-up Optional Drive -up Service Rates per Month $10.35 $7.57 (19 grandfathered residents only) $13.45 $12.87 (5 grandfathered residents only) $15.55 $12.87 (4 grandfathered residents only) $ 5.00 $5.00 $3.00 $7.00 $10.00 per truck *These rates only apply to the grandfathered residents that subscribed to this service under the previous license agreement. When Residences participate in Compostables Collection, their Solid Waste Collection needs may decrease to a point where bi-weekly, instead of weekly, Solid Waste Collection is appropriate and acceptable. For this reason only, bi-weekly Solid Waste Collection pricing is provided here and, as such, is not in violation of the terms of this License. #If the City opts out of the city-wide Blue Bag Organics program, the annual cost to its residents for the subscription Blue Bag Organics program would be $40 for the first year and $79.95 for each year thereafter. 323167v3 MJM ME230-29 11 Laket Park HIGHWAY 55 CHIPPEWA Baker Park Reserve COUNTY ROAD 24 Y CHEPPEWA Q NAVAJO COUNTY ROAD 2 HACKAMORE Hunt- Lion MEDIN q CLYD DA City of Medina Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Parks and Recreation Parcel Boundary - City Parks and Recreation - State or Regional Parks �� oa Open Space f#,A Private Recreation EXHIBIT C RESTRICTED STREETS *This map is not perfectly precise. Actual boundaries may vary, and should be field verified. Map Date: September 23, 2008 Parceld current as of October 2006 UTM, Zone 15N, NAD 83 Scale: 1:30,000 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile City of Medina August 2014 City Council Approved the Proposed Rates on September 2, 2014 for 2015 & 2016. Per the contract, Randy's can request up to a 3% CPI increase in years 3, 5, 7, and 9. Year 3-2015 Year 5-2017 Year 7-2019 Year 9 - 2021 Requesting 1.9% C P I Rate increase for 2015 Service 35 gallon 60 gallon 90 gallon 35 gallon w/BBO Grandfathered 65 gallon w/BBO Grandfathered 95 gallon w/BBO Grandfathered Addt'I Trash Cart Grass and Leaves Recycle Organics - BBO is an Opt in program - Drive -up or Carrydown (per truck) Current Proposed Rate: Rate: $10.35 $10.55 $13.45 $13.71 $15.55 $15.85 $7.57 $7.71 $10.72 $10.92 $12.87 $13.11 $5.00 $5.10 $7.00 $7.13 $5.00 $5.10 Included in Recycle Fee $10.00 $10.19 Optional service BBO = Blue Bag Organics (Source Separated Organics Collection Program) Includes supply of Compostable bags, distributed yearly MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner DATE: January 7, 2016 MEETING: January 12, 2016 Planning Commission SUBJ: Hamel Brewing — Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review — 22 Hamel Road — Public Hearing Review Deadline Review Deadline: April 13, 2016 Overview of Request 22 Hamel Road LLC has requested a Site Plan Review for construction of a structure to include a bar, brewery, and food service at 22 Hamel Road. The applicant also requests a conditional use permit for an outdoor dining, drinking, and entertainment area as an accessory use. An aerial of the subject site can be found below. The subject site is located on the east end of Hamel, northwest of the intersection of Hamel Road and Brockton Lane. The site is currently vacant with a number of trees around the perimeter. The site falls towards the railroad tracks to the north. The City approved a Site Plan Review for an apartment building for this property over a year ago, which has expired and is null and void. Proposed Site Plan The applicant proposes to construct a building of approximately 5,316 square feet. The main level would contain the bar and food service area. The basement is proposed to include brewing operations, storage for the bar, and utility space. A second level 450 square foot "mezzanine" is proposed for additional seating. The applicant proposes to construct 24 parking spaces behind the building, with the entrance/exit access drive to the east of the building. The building is proposed to include a deck to the west and north of the building. Proposed Uses Bars and restaurants are allowed service uses in the Uptown Hame1-2 district. "Brewing, distilling, and similar uses, provided such production does not exceed 50% of the floor area and provided such activities are accessory to on -site sales or consumption" is a permitted accessory use. The brewing operation is proposed to occupy less than 50% of the floor area. "Outdoor dining, drinking, or entertainment area" is listed as a conditional use in the district. Setbacks / Hardcover The following table summarizes the lot requirements of the Uptown Hame1-2 district in comparison to the proposed site plan. UH-2 District Requirement Proposed Min. Front Yard Setback Zero 10 feet Max. Front Yard Setback 10 feet 10 feet Min. Side Yard Setback Zero, or 8 feet if openings 5 feet (west -deck) 14 feet (west — building) 26 feet (east) Min. Rear Yard Setback "amount determined necessary by city" 155 feet (north) Max. Impervious Surface 90% 82% (incl. deck) Building Height 3 stories 2 stories The building meets the dimensional standards. Building Materials and Design The proposed structure is a partial two-story building with a sloped shingle roof designed to appear similar to a barn appearance. The applicant proposes fiber -cement lap siding. Hamel Brewing Page 2 of 8 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit February 2, 2016 City Council Meeting The UH-2 district code states that exterior materials shall consist of one or more of the following: natural brick, stucco, stone, wood and glass. Treated or anodized metal may be used for trim. Fiber cement siding is not listed as a permitted material, but was recently added in the rural commercial/business holding districts. Staff does not oppose the material in the Uptown Hamel area, as the appearance is similar to wood, which is an allowed material, and maintenance requirements are lower than for wood. Staff would recommend amending the zoning code to allow for the material if the Planning Commission and Council support the material. If the Planning Commission and Council do not support the material, the applicant could utilize "smartboard" siding for a similar appearance. The Planning Commission discussed the matter and stated that they were in favor of fiber cement siding, and would support amending the Uptown Hamel code to permit its use. The following requirement is included in the UH-2 district related to building design: "Fenestration — Modulation. Windows and openings shall be generous, especially on the street side, and their placement and design shall express the pedestrian friendly, livability of the town center... Buildings shall be modulated a minimum of once per 40 feet in frontage to avoid long, monotonous building walls. This modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design. At the street level, at least 30 percent of the fagade should be glass in windows and doors." The first floor of the proposed building includes a fair amount of window coverage, approximately 48% of the linear footage or 37% of the area. Because the site slopes to the north, much of the basement is exposed to the front. The basement includes the brewery function and utility uses, so there are limited windows on the basement level. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to discuss the windows on the first level if they meet the "street level" window requirements. The applicant originally proposed a solid privacy fence towards Hamel Road for the deck to the west of the building. Staff questioned if this was inconsistent with the fenestration requirements of the district. The Planning Commission concurred that it seemed inconsistent and recommended a fence which allowed a view of the deck from Hamel Road. The applicant has updated the plans consistent with the recommendation. The proposed structure is approximately 68'x50', so would only require a single element of modulation on each elevation. The proposed building does include elements of modulation from the front, with various rooflines and an overhang over the door. The eastern and western also include elements of modulation. Porches or Overhangs The Uptown Hamel district states that: "Porches, which overhang into walks, are one of Uptown Hamel's trademarks. These features should be preserved, enhanced, and improved. New commercial structures on Hamel Road and Sioux Drive are expected to be designed and constructed with these features." Hamel Brewing Page 3 of 8 February 2, 2016 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit City Council Meeting The original proposal included a small overhang over the front door as well as overhangs on the east and west elevations. Incorporating a street -level porch is complicated by the elevated first floor elevation. The Planning Commission discussed and recommended a larger overhang across the front elevation. The applicant has updated the plans to accommodate this recommendation. Stormwater and LID Review The Uptown Hamel area is served by public stormwater improvements which were constructed and the cost of which partially assessed to properties in the area. A mainline is located along the east of the subject site and also to the north. The applicant proposes to add catch basins to this mainline in order to direct water into the system. The City Engineer has provided review comments, and staff recommends that compliance with these comments be included as a condition of approval. The stormwater pipe on the southeastern portion of the property is not centered in the existing utility easement. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provides an easement over the pipe. Access/Driveway/Parking The applicant proposes an access drive on the eastern edge of the property. This access will be offset slightly from Brockton Lane. Ideally, this access would be lined up with Brockton Lane, but the applicant does not control the property to the east in order to do so. The City Engineer believes the location is close enough that the proposed offset will cause concerns. According to the survey, it appears that a portion of the street and sidewalk is located outside of the platted right-of-way. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant grants a right-of-way easement in a width recommended by the City Engineer. As noted above, the applicant proposes 24 parking spaces in the rear of the building. City Code would require 1 parking space per 3 seats in the bar plus 1 parking space per 2000 square feet of manufacturing, for a total of 50 parking spaces. Staff believes that it makes sense to account for two additional "curbside" spaces for the food service use as well, for a total of 52 required spaces. The Uptown Hamel regulations allow flexibility to off-street parking requirements. The code requirements are as follows: "Off— Street Parking. Flexibility in the number of required off-street parking spaces and loading facilities is allowed in [Uptown Hamel] because: 1) many parcels were developed prior to enactment of parking and loading requirements; 2) some parcels are small; 3) some parcels have little open space; and 4) there is a need to retain continuity of buildings fronting on Hamel Road and in the future on Sioux Drive, and there is a preference for "infill " on Hamel Road to be buildings, not parking lots or structures. In providing this flexibility, the city will consider the use and need for parking, the amount of off-street parking that is being provided, the amount of nearby onstreet parking, any nearby public parking lots, peak parking demands for the use, joint use of parking facilities, and other relevant factors. In granting a parking reduction, concern for the overall benefits to the Uptown Hamel district will be considered as well as use and enjoyment of adjacent properties and economic impacts. Hamel Brewing Page 4 of 8 February 2, 2016 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit City Council Meeting The city council may establish and allow a fee in lieu of required parking to be paid towards the full number of off-street parking spaces required by the zoning ordinance. The proceeds of this fee shall be utilized by the city to achieve alternative parking solutions in the Uptown Hamel Districts. This fee shall be established under the then -current city fee schedule." Some on -street parking is available along Hamel Road; approximately 25 spaces within 500 feet. Many of the current uses along Hamel Road are offices, which will tend to have different peak needs than Hamel Brewing. The exception to that is Inn Kahoots, to the southwest, which can be expected to have the same peak parking needs. There is additional public parking available in lots approximately 1000 feet away from the property, south of Hamel Road and west of Mill Street. Unfortunately, the subject site is fairly distant from the public parking lot. Staff encouraged the applicant to look for opportunities for shared parking on other properties as well, but the applicant has not confirmed whether they have done so. The Planning Commission and City Council should determine if adequate off-street parking has been provided for the proposed use, taking into consideration the flexibility permitted in the Uptown Hamel area. The Planning Commission discussed this matter at length during their review. Commissioners believed that the applicant should attempt to obtain approval from surrounding property owners to use their parking lots. Ultimately, six of the Commissioners determined that the flexibility sought for parking was appropriate, even if the applicant was not able to secure parking on other sites. Tree Preservation/Landscaping There are 11 significant trees located along the perimeter of the subject site. The applicant proposes to remove 9 of the trees to accommodate the proposed construction. Many of these trees are Ash and Elm trees and there is spruce closer to the street. The applicant made efforts to preserve the two largest Black Walnut trees on the site. The City's tree preservation ordinance would require replacement for removal in excess of 4 trees (plus an additional tree if necessary for street/utility construction, which is not the case here). The ordinance requires inch:inch replacement, or 48 inches in this case. The applicant proposes 2 overstory trees and an ornamental tree as part of their landscaping plan, along with a large assortment of shrubs. The overstory trees would provide 6 inches towards replacement. The applicant has requested that the City consider a waiver of the remaining replacement requirements. The Tree Preservation ordinance states that "a waiver of the number of Trees required to be replaced, may be granted by the city council, in its full and absolute discretion, on a case -by -case basis for circumstances where the applicant has exhausted all reasonable design options for the Development Site." The ordinance requires that the applicant implement best management practices to avoid tree impacts. The applicant claims to have realigned the site to avoid the large Black Walnut trees. It should also be noted that the Uptown Hamel districts contemplate denser urban development which makes it difficult to preserve scattered trees on a site. Hamel Brewing Page 5 of 8 February 2, 2016 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit City Council Meeting The Planning Commission recommended that the City grant a waiver from additional tree replacement in recognition of the site being located in Uptown Hamel and being comparatively small. One Commissioner recommended only a 50% waiver. The Uptown Hamel districts require a minimum of 5% of the site to be landscaped. The applicant's plan includes landscaping on approximately 18% of the site. Lighting The applicant proposes four parking lot lights and it appears that fixtures are also proposed along the building. The fixtures appear to match the street lights in Uptown Hamel very well. The fixtures are required to be downcast and the applicant will be required to submit photometrics confirming light does not exceed 0.2 Foot Candles at the property line after curfew. Loading Docks Loading docks are optional in Uptown Hamel, but "access to adequately handle materials must be provided on the site. A rear entrance for loading area is favored over loading area from the side or front. Loading docks, if provided, shall have a nine -ton capacity, dustless, all-weather surface and shall not be located on the street side of a building." The applicant proposes to construct a loading dock along the eastern side of the building. Originally, the applicant had requested that the dock be considered from Hamel Road in order to accommodate limited semi deliveries, but staff encouraged the applicant to look for options which were not on the street side of the building. Wetlands/Floodplains No wetlands or floodplains are located on the site or adjacent, and there are no impacts. Trash/Recycling/Mechanical Equipment The Uptown Hamel district requires that "All...recycling and trash shall be kept inside the principal buildings or within a completely screened area. If a completely screened area is used it must 1) be architecturally compatible with and made of the same or better material used on the principal building, and 2) meet the architectural and development standards of the district." The applicant proposed a screened area near the loading dock. Materials are required to be compatible with the building. Because the deck will sit above the trash enclosure, it may be advisable to include a roof structure. The applicant also proposes mechanical equipment (transformer, condensers) in this area north of the building. This area will be fairly well screened by the building, deck, and trash enclosure. The equipment may be visible from the parking lot and deck, but screening is generally required from views off of the site. Conditional Use Permit The applicant proposes a deck to the west and north of the building as an outdoor dining, drinking, and entertainment area, which is a conditional use in the district. The use is subject to the general CUP criteria of 825.39 (summarized on attached) and also by specific standards in Hamel Brewing Page 6 of 8 February 2, 2016 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit City Council Meeting the Uptown Hamel district. The City may also attach conditions upon the use in order to mitigate negative impacts. Following is a summary of the specific standards and potential findings for each: i) Shall be allowed only in connection with a restaurant or bar which has inside seating for at least 20 people. Roof -top dining is encouraged and must have suitable access and safety measures for patrons and employees. The inside restaurant/bar shows capacity of 96 people and is proposed on a deck, not a roof -top. ii) The outdoor dining/drinking/entertainment area shall not be larger than one-half of the inside seating area. The inside restaurant/bar shows capacity of 96 people and the proposed outdoor area shows seating for 48 people, exactly half of the inside area. In terms of square footage, it appears that the outside area does exceed 1/2 of the inside seating area. The applicant believes seating capacity is the more relevant factor than square footage. The Planning Commission and Council can discuss if a condition limiting outdoor seating to 48 people meets this condition. iii) The outdoor dining/drinking/entertainment area shall be delineated by decorative fencing, landscaping, building walls or some combination of these or similar features, and may be included in the green space areas with the use of pervious surface materials. The applicant proposes a privacy fence on the west and south of the outdoor seating area and a split -rail fence to the north. The privacy fence on the west likely makes sense to minimize visual and sound impacts to the west. As noted above, staff believes it may be advisable to consider a transparent fence along Hamel Road instead of a privacy fence to provide a sense of fenestration. iv) If the sale of intoxicating liquor is inside, the outside area may be required to have all access to the space from only inside the principal building. This matter will be reviewed in relation to liquor licensing requirements. The establishment's hours of operation may be limited and noise reduction measures may be required in order to minimize impact on surrounding land uses. The Planning Commission and Council may discuss whether such conditions are appropriate. If such condition is not enacted, a condition may allow the condition to be re-evaluated depending upon complaints. Review Criteria The purpose of a Site Plan Review, as described in Section 825.55, is to review proposed construction for consistency with City regulations. The City "may condition its approval in any manner it deems reasonably necessary in order to promote public health, safety or welfare, to achieve compliance with this ordinance, or to accomplish the purposes of the district in which the property is located." The main question with regards to the site plan is whether proposed parking is adequate for the proposed use. Staff believes the criteria for the outdoor seating area have been met. Hamel Brewing Page 7 of 8 February 2, 2016 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit City Council Meeting Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the request at their January 12 meeting. There was much discussion about the parking flexibility requested by the applicant. Ultimately, a motion was made to recommend approval upon condition that the applicant secure access to 10 parking spaces on another property. A motion to remove this shared parking requirement passed 6-1. A motion was also made to recommend approval if the applicant provided 50% of the required tree replacement. A motion to remove this condition passed 6-1. The Commission requested improvements to the front fa9ade, including extending the overhang on the front of the building and making the fence along Hamel Road more transparent. Following this discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall meet the recommendations of the City Engineer's comments dated 12/23/2015 2) Improvements shall be installed as shown on the plans dated 12/30/2015 except as modified herein. 3) Approval of the Site Plan shall be contingent upon an amendment to the zoning code to add fiber -cement lap siding as a permitted exterior building material in the district or the Applicant updated building plans to utilize a permitted wood material. 4) Outdoor seating shall be limited to 48 people. 5) The City may enact noise reduction conditions if deemed necessary in the future following notice to the property owner 6) The applicant shall grant an easement over the existing storm sewer pipe on the eastern side of the property and an easement for right-of-way purposes as recommended by the City Engineer. 7) The applicant shall provide photometrics on all exterior lighting in compliance with lighting regulations. All fixtures shall be downcast to limit light trespass onto adjacent property. 8) The trash enclosure materials shall be consistent with the proposed building. 9) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the site plan review, conditional use permit and other relevant documents. Potential Action If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation, the following motion would be in order: "Move direct staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions described in the staff report." Attachments 1. Conditional Use Permit Standards 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Planning Commission minutes 3. Document List 4. Engineering comments dated 12/23/2015 5. Applicant Narrative 6. Plans received by the City 12/30/2015 Hamel Brewing Page 8 of 8 February 2, 2016 Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA Section 825.39. Conditional Use Permits; Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits. In granting a conditional use permit, the Medina City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants or surrounding lands. Among other things, the City Council shall consider the following: Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. The specific criteria for outdoor seating area allows the City to require compliance with conditions which will mitigate impacts of the area on adjacent property. The applicant proposes a privacy fence to the west and limiting seating to 48 people. The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss if any other conditions are warranted. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. Staff does not believe the outdoor seating area will impede development on adjacent property. Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. Staff does not believe the outdoor seating area affects utilities or drainage or other facilities (with the possible exception of parking, which is discussed in the next criterion). Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. As noted in the report, it does increase the parking need for the subject property, and the applicant is already seeking flexibility for parking even for the inside seating. If the Planning Commission and Council find that the flexibility sought for the inside and outside seating area are appropriate, than this criterion would appear to be met. Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. The specific criteria for outdoor seating area allows the City to require compliance with conditions which will mitigate impacts of the area on adjacent property. The applicant proposes a privacy fence to the west and limiting seating to 48 people. The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss if any other conditions are warranted. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Outdoor seating areas are permitted in the district with a CUP. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. Outdoor seating areas are permitted in the district with a CUP. Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. Outdoor seating areas are permitted in the district with a CUP. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. Staff does not believe the outdoor seating area will cause traffic concerns. Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. The specific criteria for outdoor seating area allows the City to require compliance with conditions which will mitigate impacts of the area on adjacent property. The applicant proposes a privacy fence to the west and limiting seating to 48 people. The Planning Commission and City Council should discuss if any other conditions are warranted. Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant intends to construct in the spring of 2016. Subd. 12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. Hennepin County records show that the applicant is the owner of the subject property. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Hamel Brewery — 22 Hamel Road — Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Dining and Drinking Area — Public Hearing Finke presented a request from Hamel Brewing, 22 Hamel Road, for two land use requests which would allow for the development of the property as proposed; a Site Plan review to allow the building to be constructed as proposed and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the outdoor seating area. He stated that the site is currently vacant with trees around the perimeter of the site. He noted that the Commission previously reviewed an application for an eight -unit apartment building on the site, but advised that the one year time period has lapsed and that particular application is no longer valid. He displayed the proposed Site Plan, noting that the deck would be set back five feet from the property line as required. He stated that the building is proposed to be 5,300 square feet and the main level would contain the bar and food service area, while the basement would contain the brewery operation and storage and the mezzanine level would have additional seating for the bar operations. He stated that there are 24 parking spaces proposed to the north and reviewed the setback requirements in the Uptown Hamel zoning district noting that the dimensional standards of the district are met by the request. He reviewed the proposed building materials, noting that the hardy board siding proposed is not currently included in the list of allowable materials. He stated that the material was added as an allowed material in another similar zoning area and stated that staff is not opposed to adding hardy board siding as an allowed material in the Uptown Hamel zoning district, as the material would complement nearby residential development. He continued to review the required and proposed design elements. He reviewed the parking requirements, noting a total requirement of 50 spaces, with perhaps a few additional spaces for food pickup. He stated that flexibility is provided in the Uptown Hamel zoning district, noting that available on -street parking can be considered, and advised that there are 25 on -street parking stalls available. He referenced the City owned parking lot which is approximately 1,000 feet from this site. He stated that perhaps there would be another adjacent use with an off-peak use that could provide shared parking, such as an office or the chiropractor clinic. He noted that the outdoor seating area would only be available during the warmer weather months of the year, therefore during the colder months only 34 stalls would be needed as the outdoor seats could be removed from the calculation. He reviewed the proposed tree removal and tree replacement that would be required; noting that the applicant is requesting a waiver from the ordinance. He stated that the outdoor seating area requires a CUP, which allows the City to place conditions on that approval. He stated that the privacy fence would help to minimize the impact of the outdoor seating on the adjacent properties. Murrin referenced the aerial view of the property and pointed out an area north of Hamel Road, asking if there is an easement that would allow for an extension of Brockton Lane, noting that could realign the driveway and possibly provide an area for additional parking. Finke stated that the property is owned by the adjacent property owner to the east, noting that there is not right-of-way in that location for extension of public services. He stated that it could be possible for the parcel of property to be purchased, but noted that is not what is proposed in this application. Albers referenced the deck and confirmed the distance between the deck and neighboring commercial property which is currently listed for sale. Foote referenced the City owned parking lot, which was mentioned and confirmed that is a parking lot for the park. Barry asked if the privacy wall was taken into account for the window calculations. Finke stated that just the building itself is taken into account for those calculations. V. Reid asked if suggestions were made to the applicant regarding shared parking arrangements. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Finke stated that staff recommended that the applicant look into that and noted that the applicant will follow up to determine options. V. Reid opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Jordan Lockner, ATSR Architects, stated that there were some comments in the report regarding granting of the right-of-way easement and noted that they may want to have a title search done before granting that. He referenced the storm sewer line and the easement requested for that, stating that they would be open to that. He also noted that an accommodation to the owner of the property may be needed if the City desired to expand the line in the future, as that could impact the building/site. Foote asked if the applicant has any similar businesses to this in the metro area, noting that perhaps an accurate parking estimate could be made using the other business as a model. Todd Murley stated that they do not have other businesses like this. He noted that most of the tap rooms that he has visited in the metro are in urban areas and therefore on -street parking is used. He did not think it would be too far to walk from the City lot. V. Reid stated that she was concerned with the overhang and porch requirement, noting that the City has worked hard to establish a friendly look in the Uptown Hamel area. She stated that while she likes the barn type look of the building she would like to see a more friendly view and expanded porch for the front side of the building. Joe Anton, ATSR Architects, stated that a number of versions were reviewed for the front favade of the building, specifically the porch and overhang. He stated that a much larger porch and overhang had been proposed, but because of the service of alcohol the owner of the business does not want to encourage patrons to hang out on the front porch area. He stated that they are attempting to create a point of intrigue on the front fagade with the glazing. V. Reid referenced the fence for the patio, noting that staff recommends a more transparent fence, and asked if the applicant would be open to replacing the solid fence with a more transparent fence. Anton stated that he would be open to that, but would have to speak with the business owner. Lockner stated that the applicant's view is to keep the activity within the site and screen unwanted activity from the adjacent users. He noted that the benefit was not to the outdoor seating area, but the adjacent uses and therefore they would be open to a more transparent fence. Barry asked why there are two garage doors proposed for the loading dock area. Lockner stated that the door to east would allow equipment and forklifts to come in at grade and enter the basement level, while there is a three-foot difference in the loading dock. V. Reid referenced the issue of the front porch and asked if drinking would be a concern for staff. Finke stated that he did not believe it would naturally draw people to hang out in that area and noted that it would require policing by the applicant. V. Reid noted that the intent for Uptown Hamel is to make it feel older like a welcoming neighborhood and that is why she would like to see the porch. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Lockner stated that they designed the site to keep people off the street, but noted that it sounds like the City would actually desire the opposite. He stated that they did have a design that had a larger porch and is more what V. Reid is speaking of, but they had thought that the City would probably want to keep the patrons on the site more and that is why they made the design choices they did. Albers asked if the awning should be made larger while the steps remain the same with the larger deck on the other side. Finke stated that the theory would be that you would be walking on the sidewalk and walk underneath the awnings but noted that the grade for this property provides separation that would not make that possible in this location. White asked how far along the landscaping plan is and whether it is known as to if there is room for additional tree replacement on site. Lockner stated that the site is pretty tight and they tucked in as many trees as they could, therefore there is not much additional space to plant more trees without impacting the site and plowing capability. He stated that native plant material and grasses would be used on the site in order to blend in with the trees on neighboring sites. He stated that the site will have a natural feel because of the heavy trees that exist on neighboring sites. V. Reid referenced the issue of parking. Murley stated that in regard to parking they attempted to fit as many spaces on the site as they could and are hoping to work with the City in order to make this work. He confirmed that they have not approached other businesses, such as the VFW. He stated that they are in the process of possibly obtaining additional land as well that could assist with parking, but noted that would not be complete by the time the application moves forward. He stated that for the majority of the time he did not think the business would need the amount of parking required by the City. He stated that hopefully they will be able to work with the VFW to obtain shared parking, but did not want that to be a sticking point for the approval of the application. Finke stated that this would be similar to the Kal Point application the Commission recently reviewed in regard to parking and shared parking. He noted that the layout of the site, placing the building towards the front to fit into the Uptown Hamel model, forgoes additional parking that could be gained by placing the building to the rear of the site. White asked the anticipated hours of the business. Murley replied with the anticipated hours of the tap room, noting that the business would be closed on Mondays and Tuesdays. He stated that the brew room would be open on Monday and Tuesday with a minimum number of employees working, maybe two or three. Murrin asked and received the response that there would be four business partners investing in the business. She asked if the business partners would be doing the brewing themselves. Murley stated that he will start out brewing with one assistant. Murrin asked if the partners would be running the restaurant themselves or whether they would hire someone to run the restaurant. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Dave Unitan stated that they are still working on the details. Murley stated that they would be in charge of the tap room and the kitchen would be its own entity that would supply the food. He stated that their desire would be to have a general manager that would manage the restaurant and tap room. Murrin asked if any of the partners have experience in restaurants or tap rooms or whether this is a new venture. Murley stated that he grew up working in the food service industry, but does not have experience running a restaurant. He stated that he does have experience in home brewing, but would also be bringing in another person with experience. Jim Tiller, Treasurer of Arnt Hamel property, stated that his primary interest is drainage. He stated that in the material he has seen it appears there is a stormwater improvement or pipe to the east and north. He stated that the site slopes to the north and asked where the storm pipes exit. Finke stated that the stormwater system is part of the Uptown Hamel system and provided additional details. He stated that the parking lot would be guttered and would enter the system to flow into Rainwater Park. Tiller stated that there is a lot of water that flows downhill currently across the tracks and onto the Arnt property. He noted that his concern is that additional water would flow down onto the property. Finke stated that in most instances this will be an improvement in that area, but noted in heavy rain events water could still flow down the hill. Tiller asked where snow storage would occur, noting that if placed on the railroad property that melting snow would melt downhill onto the Arnt property. Lockner stated that they would obviously push it where they can, but noted that if it becomes a problem they could stockpile it in the back parking stalls or haul it off site. He stated that it could be put on the greenspace between the deck and south parking stalls. Dave Truax stated that he is interested in beer and has been listening to the discussion. He stated that he lives near the site and walks by quite often. He used the example of Loretto that has businesses right on the road that do not have a lot of parking and seem to work well. R. Reid noted similar types of businesses in neighboring cities that have limited parking and use on street parking. She stated that they do want that type of activity in Uptown Hamel, but was unsure whether a lot of on street parking is the best. Murley stated that the applicant should talk to the VFW as that is the easiest location to share parking and that is most likely where patrons would park if needed. V. Reid closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. V. Reid reviewed the issues that the Commission should discuss and come to consensus on. She asked the applicant how important the hardy board siding would be for use. 4 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Anton stated that the hardy board siding is less susceptible to rot and therefore was attractive. He stated that if it was necessary to go without that material, the applicant would be able to pick a different product. V. Reid stated that the Commission has recently allowed the material for use in another zoning district. Murrin asked if there was a reason the Commission wants to approve the material for the district as a whole or just for the one application. V. Reid stated that she would just prefer to allow the material within the Uptown Hamel district. She confirmed the consensus of the Commission. Finke stated that the Commission would need to hold a public hearing for that action at a future meeting. Murrin asked if the material could be approved for this application to allow the applicant to continue to move forward. Finke explained that the approval could be conditioned on either an approval of the amended ordinance or amending the exterior materials to those allowed in the district. Murrin stated that she would like a more transparent design for the fence that allows people to see into the patio seating area. She referenced the stairs on the front and was unsure the purpose. Anton provided additional details on the purpose for the stairs, noting that will assist in mitigating the grade of the site. V. Reid stated that there should be large railings for safety. Murrin referenced the layout of the stairs and suggested they be laid out in another direction. Anton explained that there would not be sufficient space for that layout. He provided additional information on the loading dock area and its impact on the height of the building. He provided additional information on the design of the loading dock. V. Reid stated that there are comments regarding the mass in the front, but no solutions have been presented from the Commission. She agreed that it would help to reduce the mass by making the side fence more transparent. She asked how the railing would look. Lockner replied that the railing would be on both sides of the steps and would follow the steps. Murrin asked if the building could be set back further on the site to put the steps in the front rather than on the side. Anton replied that there are setbacks for the back and additional parking stalls would be lost as well. He noted that the intent of Uptown Hamel is to have buildings in the front of the site. White stated that one of the conditions could state that the patio on the west has railings similar to the patio as shown on the south elevation. V. Reid asked if it would be possible to have more of an overhang on the front. Barry replied that the windows would need to be smaller. 5 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Murrin stated that she likes the bigger windows. She stated that perhaps the porch could be made to look like a walkout but not really a walkout, noting that there is another one of that example in Uptown Hamel, similar to a balcony that is just for show. Anton replied that would be more costly. He stated that he could mention that to the office to determine if a reasonable compromise could be found, such as extending the overhang over the stairway to soften that aspect. V. Reid stated that the extended overhang would meet the requirements of the district. She also confirmed that the applicant would be comfortable with the more transparent fence. R. Reid referenced the wall in front of the stairs and asked what kind of material that would be, specifically whether it would be natural stone or manufactured stone. Lockner stated that the material would be stone. He stated that the architect would like to use a material similar to the stone band around the base of the building. He stated that most likely the stone would go around the base of the stoop similar to the base of the building. R. Reid stated that she does not like manufactured stone and simply wanted to ensure that the material would not look manufactured or like a retaining wall. Anton replied that natural stone would most likely be used as well. Finke provided additional details on the tree preservation ordinance and waiver requirements. White stated that her first thought is that a number of properties have requested the waiver and the Commission has not granted the waiver request and instead required offsite planting; therefore, she would not support the waiver. Finke stated that waivers have been issued in the past, using the Fields of Medina development as an example. He noted that is a different type of development and does not set precedent. Murrin asked if the applicant is requesting a waiver in order to not pay the offsite planting fees. Finke stated that is not technically a waiver, as that could be done without a waiver. Murrin agreed that there would not be an area to plant the trees on this site. V. Reid stated that this is the type of business the City wants and asked if the Commission wanted to grant a partial waiver. Foote stated that he would support a partial waiver, as the applicant will be preserving the Black Walnut Trees on the site. R. Reid stated that perhaps Uptown Hamel should be looked at differently, as the City does want higher density and trees will need to be removed that cannot be replanted on the site. She stated that residential development is different because of the available space for trees. 6 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes Murrin stated that it would still be good to collect the funds and plant trees elsewhere in the City to keep the City green. She stated that she would support a 50 percent waiver and still collect funds to plant additional trees. R. Reid stated that her only concern with parking would be the proximity to Inn Kahoots, which may also use some of the on street parking. V. Reid stated that she is not a fan of more parking than needed as she does not like to see empty parking lots. She stated that they may be able to ease into the parking now, but as the business becomes more popular more parking may be needed. She stated that a shared parking arrangement for an additional ten spaces would be preferred. She stated that in the summer people can walk and utilize the City lots. Foote stated that directional signage could be posted directing patrons to the appropriate spots, such as the City owned lots. Murrin stated that she would support a shared parking arrangement as well and would also support the agreement only covering the ten additional spots. V. Reid asked how busy Inn Kahoots is on the weekends. Marilyn Larson, Inn Kahoots, stated that her business is busy and the lot is full on the weekends and for events. She stated that some people will always prefer to park on the street. She stated that if people want to go the business they will find somewhere to park. She stated that she is not worried about patrons taking parking spaces that might otherwise be used by her patrons. Finke stated that staff did review the other similar businesses in neighboring cities, with businesses close to the street and little parking. He stated that ultimately staff discussed this issue and came down to the bigger concern of the negative impacts to other business owners. Murrin stated that perhaps more than ten stalls should be included in the shared parking agreement because of the possibility that snow storage may occur on the back stalls. White stated that she disagrees that a larger number of stalls would be required. She stated that if people are going to go to the business they will find a spot to park. She believed that the Commission should follow a similar path as the Kal Point application, noting that if parking in neighboring lots becomes a problem the applicant shall install signage directing patrons to available parking stalls. She stated parking spaces cannot be created where they do not exist. R. Reid stated that people will walk, and noted that she and her husband often walk when visiting businesses in this type of development and have no issue with it. She stated that the area needs this type of development and she would not require a parking agreement. Finke stated that perhaps additional signage could be posted alerting of the City owned lots as well as increasing the visibility of those lots. V. Reid agreed that this is a good business which she wants to encourage, but wanted to ensure that this would not set the business up for parking issues in the future. She stated that she is encouraged by the fact that Inn Kahoots does not have issues with parking. Murrin referenced the hardy board siding and wanted to ensure that the siding is installed per manufacturer's specifications. 7 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 1/12/2016 Meeting Minutes V. Reid stated that would be discussed further at the public hearing for that item. Murrin asked if staff believed additional windows should be installed. Finke stated that the applicant has done what they can from the point of staff and it would be hard to add more windows without redesigning the building or putting windows into the loading dock area. Motion by Murrin, seconded by R. Reid, to recommend approval of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Dining and Drinking Area for Hamel Brewery at 22 Hamel Road, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report, modified as follows: 1. Change the condition related to exterior building materials so that approval is contingent either on an amendment to the Code or to plans being updated with materials that meet the Code; 2. Add a condition that plans be updated to extend the overhang on the front of the building further to the west; 3. Add a condition that plans be updated so that the fence on the south of the outdoor seating area is more transparent; 4. Add a condition stating that approval is contingent upon the applicant obtaining an agreement with another property owner to use a minimum of ten parking stalls; 5. Add a condition requiring 50 percent of the replacement trees to be provided on -site, or through a contribution to the environmental fund. Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Foote, to amend the motion to delete the condition related to shared parking. Motion approved 6-1 (Murrin opposed). Motion by Foote, seconded by White, to amend the motion to delete the condition related to tree replacement, in order to grant the tree replacement waiver requested by the applicant. Motion approved 6-1 (Murrin opposed). The amended motion carries unanimously. 8 Project: LR-15-173 — Hamel Brewery Site Plan Review and CUP The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 12/16/2015 12/16/2015 3 Application Y Application -Updated 12/30/2015 12/30/2015 3 Application-12-30-2015 N Fee 12/16/2015 12/10/2015 1 Fee Y $5000 Mailing Labels 12/31/2015 12/31/2015 1 Labels Y Narrative 12/15/2015 NA 2 Narrative Y Narrative -Additional 12/30/2015 NA 1 Narrative-Add-12-30-2015 N Plans 12/15/2015 12/11/2015 12 Plans Y 12 pages + 4 pages color elev. Plans -Updated 12-30-2015 12/30/2015 NA 2 UpdatedSheets-12-30-2015 N L3.0 and Inside Seating Layout Plans-Updated01-05-2016 01/05/2015 NA 1 UpdatedL30-01-05-2016 N Sheet L3.0 Plans-Updated01-22-2016 01/22/2016 NA 1 UpdatedA3 N Sheet A3.0 Stormwater Report 12/15/2015 12/11/2015 104 Stormwater Report Y Site Plan Review Checklist 12/15/2015 NA 3 Site Plan Review Checklist Y Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Engineering Comments 12/23/2015 2 EngComments-12-23-2015 Legal Comments 12/20/2015 1 Legal Comments Elm Creek Watershed Email 12/17/2015 1 Elm Creek — NoReview No Watershed Review required Building Official Comments 12/21/2015 1 Building Comments-12-21-15 Police Comments 12/16/2015 1 Police Comments No Comments Planning Commission Report 01/07/2016 8 PCReport-01-12-2016 Total of 27 pages with attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Public Hearing Notice 12/31/2015 Notice Planning Commission minute excerpt 01/12/2016 PCExcerpt 8 pages YY SB Associates, Inc. engineering • planning • environmental • construction December 23, 2015 Mr. Dusty Finke Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Hamel Brewery Site Plan Submittal: City Project No. LR-15-173 WSB Project No. 02712-720 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the updated site plan submittal for the proposed Hamel Brewery site. The plans propose to construct one new building structure at 22 Hamel Road. Documents provided for review include civil site and grading plans dated 12/11/15, and stormwater management plan dated 12/11/15. The plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. 1. No permit is required from ECWMC as the project is less than their review threshold. 2. The site is tributary to Elm Creek. The south portion of the site is tributary to the City's existing regional storm sewer system, which is a 24-inch pipe that discharges to an existing regional pond west of the development in Rainwater Park. 3. Based on the LiDAR information, it appears that approximately an additional 100-feet west of the site is tributary to the development. This additional offsite runoff should be incorporated into the HydroCAD models. 4. The City generally does not allow hard cover in side yard drainage and utility easements. The proposed development will have improvements within the drainage and utility easement. 5. Water quality BMPs are not required as the area was included in the sizing calculations for the existing regional pond downstream of the site. 6. Connections to the existing storm sewer piping shall be made with a manhole structures; no direct connections allowed. A storm sewer manhole should be added at the connection to the existing 24" storm sewer from FD-6. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02712-720\Admin\Does\Plan Submittal 121515\_2015-12_23 Hamel Brewery - Site Plan & Stormwater Review Comments - Final.docx Site Plan Review — Hamel Brewery December 23, 2015 Page 2 7. Provide drainage and utility easement for existing storm sewer where existing D&U easement does not fully encompass the pipe. 8. Note size and type of existing sanitary sewer service, existing water services, and storm sewer piping in and around the site. Expand view of plan to show nearest fire hydrant. 9. Note two benchmarks on the plan. 10. Verify location of shut-off for the 6-inch water service stub. If the shut-off is located within the proposed granite stairway, it will need to be moved/added to a location at least 5' from the stair structure. 11. City standard plates should be added in place of the "VAA" plates. Provide typical section detail for concrete entrance apron. 12. Proposed grading contours and/or point grades should be amended so that runoff does not overtop the retaining wall from the east side. 13. Proposed grading along the eastern side of the site appears to be steeper than 3:1. Amend the proposed grading or add a retaining wall so that the slope is 3:1 or flatter. 14. Show more grade percentages along curb lines and between contours. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. 1002712-720\Admin\Does\Plan Submittal 121515\ 201542-23 Hamel Brewery - Site Plan & Stormwater Review Comments - Final.docx To: City of Medina Planning and Zoning Department Enclosed please find the application for Site Plan review for a new multi -tenant building to be located at 22 Hamel Road in Uptown Hamel. Efforts have been made to incorporate the many discussions with city planning to create a suitable site and building that matches the Uptown Hamel vision of the future. Specifically: • More transparency on the front favade. • Allowing the parking lot to circulate, which may be conducive to future circulation if there's ever a road put through the back of the site. We are excited to be the first new building in the area, and hope to bridge current commercial trends with Hamel's past. The main tenant in the building will be Hamel Brewing LLC — a small craft brewer with limited distribution of kegs, cans and bottles of beer made in Hamel. Total target volume for Hamel Brewing is 1000 barrels of beer in year 1, growing to around 5000 barrels eventually. A second tenant is being sought to occupy the kitchen space as a standalone food service establishment for take away food. First Tenant Water Use: Area / Use Square Footage Estimated Water Use Estimated Sewer Use Tap Room 4315 40,000 gal 38,000 gal Brewing Area 3485 105,400 gal 26,350 gal Second Tenant Water Use: Area / Use Square Footage Estimated Water Use Estimated Sewer Use Kitchen/Take Away 775 6000 gal 6000 gal Regarding Trees: The project is requesting a waiver from tree mitigation/replacement requirements. The proposed plan calls for saving the 2 largest and most significant trees on the site. To save these trees the site had to be redesigned and a number of different options were developed with trees in mind. The current design is a compromise between tree preservation and Hamel Uptown zoning requirements. The requirements ask for an urban frontage that locates the building along the street, putting the building where of most of the valuable significant trees are located. If it had been possible to locate the building to the rear of the site, the majority of the trees impacted would have been limited to Elm and Ash Trees, both of which are at a high risk for disease in the near future. An attractive landscape design has been created with as many trees as will functionally fit on the site. This concept is a compromise between the urban character of the Hamel Downtown strip and the woodlands that surround the east and north sides of the site. At the streetscape, there is a formal planting bed with appealing stairs and retaining wall structures. In an effort to become more compatible with the neighboring woodlands, the adjacent green spaces are being replanted with a savanna grass and forb seed mix. This will improve the site's ecological function and will reintroduce native species in a beneficial way to the landscape. Also note that trees of adequate size will be milled, kiln dried and incorporated back into the building by Wood from the Hood — a snippet from their web site: Currently, most trees in the metro region are sent to landfills, shredded into landscape mulch, or burned. Wood from the Hood is changing that. By reclaiming wood from all over the Twin Cities, these trees are able to live on in the form of sustainable, handcrafted wood products. Thank you for your consideration. D�Cfminic E Fragomeni 22 Hamel Road LLC 12/11/2015 Page 2 HAMEL BREWING CO. \�I To: City of Medina Planning and Zoning Department Enclosed is the additional information requested for the conditional use permit for Hamel Brewing Co. project. The conditional use permit is addressing the shortage of parking as required by zoning code. Parking: We are finding that our proposed parking along with on street parking will satisfy our parking needs. With the desired urban frontage for the site and other limiting factors on -site parking is limited to 24. The remainder of required spaces needed, will be found in the adjacent city street frontage and parking lots. We believe these available spots will adequately support the tap room/restaurant. Parking Summary: Parking required by zoning (1 space/3 seats in taproom/restaurant) - 144 Seats/3=48 parking spaces. Parking for Industrial brewing operations(1 stall per 2,000 SF or Workers on largest shift) — 2 spaces. The uses are going to be used at different times so we are expecting our max parking need to be in the taproom/restaurant. Requiring 48 total spaces. Parking Provided on site — 24 spaces Remainder of public parking available: 25 spaces in 600 ft, There are 125 more public parking spaces if you expand the distance to 1000 ft. from site. Thank you for your consideration. Dominic E Fragomeni 22 Hamel Road LLC 12/11/2015 ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD& RYDEEN, INC Hanle I B revvery Site P an Submittal 22 Hamel Road Medina, Minnesota 55340 MATERIAL SYMBOLS CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE (CONC) EARTH •Oo tee 8 POROUS FILL STONE OR GRAVEL BATT INSULATION ( INS) RIGID INSULATION ( INS) METAL (MET) STEEL (STL) ROUGH WOOD (WD) PLYWOOD (PWD ) STEEL STUD PARTITION (PLAN VIEW) LEGEND G 10-D A100 O ROOM NUMBER NEW DOOR (NUMBER RELATES TO ROOM NUMBER) REFER TO DOOR SCHED ELEVATION OR DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER WALL SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER GRID / UNIT MATCHLINE PLAN NOTE GENERAL NOTES I. ARROWS —PI INDICATE DIMENSIONS TO NOMINAL FACE OF MODULAR MATERIALS, TO CENTER LINES AND TO GRID LINES. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS LOCATION MAP 15S 1 PROJECT LOCATION Pine ooer TR v 0 ' 4 t 0 Art 2 heart 11 tot_ US Pest Dike tnn Kafwots r Hamel Legion Aar* gd ss•vood Sa 'camel Rd z ►'erltawsuine lr+ h *fir PROJECT INFORMATION ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERS ARMSTRONG, TORSETIN, SKOLD, AND RYDEEN, INC. 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 300 GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 PHONE: 1&3-545-3131 FAX: 1&3-525-3289 CONTACTS: ARCHITECTURE/PROJECT MGR: DEAN S. BEENINGA, AIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: RON SPODEN, ASLA SPECIFICATIONS: JOSEPH ANTON ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: NICK ACHINA, PE SHEET INDEX GI TITLE SHEET CIvIL AND LANDSCAPE C2.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C3.0 SITE UTILITY PLAN C4.0 CIvIL DETAILS L1.0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY L2.0 SITE DEMOLITION a TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L3.0 SITE LAYOUT PLAN L4.0 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A3.0 FLOOR PLAN AND BUILDING SECTION A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL ESI ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com © ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS DRAWN BY JDA CHECKED BY REE ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME TITLE SHEET ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER G1 ARCHITECTURE CD z z a LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 : 763.525.3289 LL 0 0 U CONSULTANTS OVESS NW'euipayAl peoA ZZ �IIIII����''ll IIIIIn,�IAI CHECKED BY ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME ATS&R PROJECT NO. 00 CV O LC) SHEET NUMBER 0 NOI1of1aLsN0o 0d 10N - A IVNIW1-132:1d 9ttry-£Lt -ZSG :XVA 1414-CLt7-Z96 •3N0Hd sl3�lrs g� ss`7� bawki 1N 3SN3311 NNIIN 5/'L, Z •/% 31.V0 133NS 99C99 NON `3y1V1 ON0 1 3Altla A/10111M "N 91717 90,"96 or eor ;07- x.13>103H0 SH3NNYld ONvi t1:10A3nans ®Nv-i `52133NIJN3 1In19 I �OZ=[�L •eioseuulW Jo a;e3S ayi.i.o smel ayT aoans aa► m App a we ;ew NMH I❑ f I L s V ;pun puei pesueon 1 pue uo!swedns pea p Ave Jepun to ew Aq paledaad serve ❑351A3Zi S,4-bZ-46 iLVI IC-a6l. oda� Jo `ueld `1�211JnS sly} fey} !}iao l�ga�ay l 73NJ153C] S `idW a h8 31VO ISNOISIA321 uan;ep pawnsse ue uodn paseq ale unnogs sBupeag wn;ep lanai eas ueew `cull Jno;uoo 6u!;s!x3 : - ;as Javew uoJl : 0 punoj JelJew uoal : • .s;uawgoeoaoue ao s;uawanoadw! Jaq;o Cue nnvgs o; podand ;au saop;I .uoaaaq; saw; Jofeua Buy;s!xa pue `ApadoJd paciposap anoqe aq; jo AgdeaBodo; pue sepepunoq aq; smogs Aanins s!ql 'otb 101 pies 40 null Apa;sea ;sow aq; wail `salBue ;(46p ;e paanseaw `Apa;sannTaal Lo G pue o; lammed unneap au!l e;o Apa;sann Bu!RI ot p1 i [ -oN [ { pies jo ued leg; ;daoxa uum A;unoo u!dauuaH[ l~ trZ uo!sv pgns s,JO;lpn►a 017;01 Bupupaq ;o ;ulod aq; o; 80 ;o1 pies jo aull y ou ay; Boole ;sane aouaq; .gg ;o1 pies jo auD gpou aq; o; gg ;o1 jo aull ;saran aq; 0; lalleaed gpou eoueq; `o;aaaq; segue t p46p ;e painseaua I.tt,Z 'oN uosv pgns sdol!pn'd 'LE poi jo au!l ;sea aq; jo ;saranPal Lo I, Q 1 ;upd a o; papua;xa 6g ;o1 p!es;o auu q;aou aq; Buole ;sea aouaq; . IttrZ ..oN uop!n!pgns 0sdo;!pny `Bg pi jo JeW00 ;seagpou aq; o; 8g ;o1 pies ;o aug ;sane aq; Boole q;nos X 1 1 aouaq; `gg ;o1 pas Jauaoo ;samwou aq; ;e Bupuewwoo :sMollo; se paquosap gg ;o1 p!es;o ;Jed leg; ;deoxa "uum `Alunoo u!deuue ` i.vz .oN uo!sygpgns s,ao pnd `gg ;v1 .uum `Alunoo u!dauue ` 1,17Z .oN uo!s!n!pgns sdoppny `L'g ;01 Z , 1 :(q`BDZBg I, .0N all!1 to a;eo!l!Pa0 woJ3) N011dIHOS3❑ -IV031 r' 1 M, --__ `-----J 1 I -- 1 ,_ -4_ 1 ,_ ___ 1 �, l 1 1 — -� s©©� - ANI V � A31� ss•s�©�=n313 w18 8 31a1�Nawr � f J --� ' ` ' I7 �~,' 1 ``` ~$1 PSFx 61 l /ti �`' " 9! 6 i Au! N c - �4 _ -. , _ t i -�� -��``-r 310d�4. FSad�NbW isijm y li-crro owa,,_ �° �� ,f �--- 1UI���a 7 . f/1 al 3-rs ``-,f ����O�a�1S F _� / 1N13 �7b cus bd / `` j-- / �-az-Gf _'3013 _ mXpB „a - - y r -- _ --__ 0 Go If --- ----.41z, ti i / Illt /C 1 I / / 0 i f 7 .i 1 ,II ! 1 /m ,, / r a \ �— - m , p f r +? r f / rs f j r � /� � , L Cn [, cGo ` i+ 1 fi£ 1{7, 3D f rr� r 1 t:+#i' 0£ � r� I i r f 6 s�i9NZipo 3N 1 I r i nN1kIM c �- 3N1, H1HON j I j I� 31dbW {:;- f ek,�!_ J„�� �:,, ••: G7 �'-- ,/ j f �' 1� 1 '' a 1 1 1 / o ' f inNldnn I Q 8 .I Vie II _ ` -- -- s£ ;© - - 1v1 3N111S3M , 4i: / 1 I 4� fj I.' _� �M1 ss 101 3Q 3N11 1S3M 133d NI 31VOS to v, + �� 011311d8Vd 3NI1 I01 S CI° ` `�_ i os OP aZ o \ \ -- 1 1nN1Vnn io, I'D MN c �3NaQo \ >10Y19 v Ni I it \ U + \ 1 \ VV 101.S ON1/91X3 1 1 \ i 1 1 31. Vw t,:,44_ „ S • � 9 m oa le 1!H3M3S s 1 �` N\ inNivm \� / \ V 19 N-- � \\ 1 i ` \ t. „0r \ } N.�:[ \ \ I i ._.. �- 1 \ �� 1 _ L179013 .ON "ava Had - �1 ! _ 1 1N3W3S'd3 3JdNl'd ❑N'd A11111 1 p l + -�. N. `� ` 1 1- --I- - - `= �f � \ �~ � `�4;�� 1 0 T _ \ ' \ \ \ �_ -� � o \ \ mot `\ -- _ -� --o� _ N. yi \ '� Zy'�i,� _ N i �-.. -� 1 �- _ � U' ck o_ .- �! 4 09 \ -- io el.at ti AN, ~ zoo `-I � \ l --- 6_112,1'--INI�t 80 Stoe=1-�~--\� \ \. 1 + z 6 310F1N'dlf o �� � ` t'c ��_ \ t o►�„•frz ONI�S �� \ \ 1JC3 -y _� '` \ of \\ \ \ o \ VOU o \ \ \\ 60tm\� \ `ti, o \ \it, \ oi` \\ \\ ,, \ \ \ \. \ \ \ 'd1�3S3NNI W `AiNtlN1d3\NN3H �� ' wens ganv tot? it oc 'LE S101 NI I•17Z 3 I 131A11114 96 7 avou 1:10A A3AtillS AO 31V31A111:130 M I I I I NW CORNER OF LOT 38 - LINE PARALLEL TO WEST LINE OF LOT 38 WEST LINE �OF LOT 38 NE NE CORNER OF LOT 39 0 Z �I _co X W CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EXISTING BUILDING emu' LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SEE DETAIL C-1000/C4.0 PROVIDE STAIRS WITH 7 RISERS AT 7" SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SEE DETAIL C-1000/C4.0 INLET PROTECTION SEE DETAIL PROPOSED DECK. FFE=1030.00 SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER DETAIL. GRADE SHOWN IS GRADE BELOW DECK SURFACE PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=1030.00 UPPER LEVEL FFE=1017.00 LOWER LEVEL PROVIDE STAIRS WITH 5 RISERS AT 5". SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROVIDE STAIRS WITH 6 RISERS AT 5". SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SILT FENCE DETAIL C-1003/C4.0 PROPOSED DECK RAMP SLOPED AT 5.00% MAXIMUM SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER DETAIL INLET PROTECTION SEE DETAIL PROPOSED LOADING DOCK TOP OF LOADING DOCK=1019.94 BOTTOM OF LOADING DOCK=1016.94 PROVIDE STAIRS WITH 6 RISERS AT 5". SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS HAMI- ROAD EX/Y-/X/NG SiAN/TEA0 SEVI/14x-sAN ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL C-1002/C4.0 MANHOLE 112 RIlk7F-tygs-x3 71 08 INLET PROTECTION SEE DETAIL sPe DETAIL C-1003/C4.0 INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL C-1002/C4.0 SILT FENCE SEE DETAIL die' 'RI il Pi hei Ili 101 ji101 lie lit Olt11011IT-Al I 1114 illi Peir hill iiiii Gil Mr 51011 il IL iiii ilit iikti iAli WI milt 11 ii. , l,,,. , ,,,,,„ ...,,„ ,,,,,,,, ogo gitti ii NY 0- ii III 22.98 BC' PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY EROSION CONTROL AND TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT BLANKET, SEE DETAIL C-1000/C4.0 INLET PROTECTION SEE DETAIL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE BEAVER TAIL CURB /1.910 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT NUMBER 15-435, DATED NOVEMBER 24, 2015 . BACKGROUND SURVEY ON THESE DRAWINGS IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO SURVEY AS THE BASIS FOR ALL PROJECT WORK. ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT NUMBER 2014.110 DATED JULY 28, 2014. 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN 6. ALL WORK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF MEDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS. 7. ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P "EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES". THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 8. CATCHBASINS AND MANHOLES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN LARGER THAN ACTUAL SIZE. COORDINATE LOCATION OF MANHOLE COVER AND CASTING SO THAT IT IS PROPERLY LOCATED AT THE BACK OF CURBLINE FOR THE CURB INLETS OR CENTERED IN THE AREA AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN FOR THE AREA DRAINS AND MANHOLE 9. FLARED END SECTIONS (FES) ARE SHOWN ON PLAN LARGER THAN ACTUAL SIZE. ALL PIPE LENGTHS INCLUDE FES. CONTRACTOR/SURVEYOR TO STAKE THE END OF FES FOR 10. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT STREETS AND SIDEWALKS PER CITY OF MEDINA AND MMUTCD REQUIREMENTS. 11. ANY WORK PERFORMED OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES MUST BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND ALL REGULATING GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND APPROPRIATE PERMITS MUST BE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE TO TOP OF GRADE, PAVEMENT OR BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE 2. PROVIDE PERMANENT SEEDING AND FERTILIZING OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANS. 2. INSTALL PERIMETER AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ITEMS PRIOR TO SF PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION TOP OF WALL BOTTOM OF WALL TOP OF LOADING DOCK BOTTOM OF LOADING DOCK HIGH POINT DENOTES SURFACE DRAINAGE PROPOSED SILT FENCE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PROPSOED SEDIMENT CONTROL AT MH/CB PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED BIOLOG PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SECTION LINE EXISTING EASEMENT EX-STM - EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EX-SAN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING TREES ALL EXISTING INFORMATION INCLUDING ALL UTILITY INVERTS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR DETAILS FOR BUILDING FOUNDATION DRAINTILE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MATCH INTO EXISTING. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com CONSULTANTS Planners and Engineers Plymouth, MN 55441 763.559.9100 cp SIGNATURE / SEAL I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SIGNATURE TYPED OR PRINTED NAME LICENSE NUMBER CHECKED BY ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE SHEET NAME SITE GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER SITE GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C2 0 I I I PROPOSED CLEANOUT SEE DETAIL C-3013/C4.0 T'" A j i GENERAL NOTES PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) SEE DETAIL C-5030/C4.0 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SEE DETAILS C-5005/C4.1, C-5010/C4.1, AND C-5024/C4.1 NW CORNER OF LOT 38 LINE PARALLEL TO WEST LINE OF LOT 38 NE WEST LINE OF LOT 38 NE CORNER OF LOT 39 PROPOSED DECK, SEE SPECIFICATION FOR FURTHER DETAIL t 6.0I 1 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FURTHER DETAIL ..*"."'• . R=2035. O8 =03 °0 1 46 IL�A11}g y1 ITS. CONCRETE JOINTING SEE DETAIL C-5073/C4.1 DD DT D DT DD DT PROPOSED SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SEE DETAIL C-5033/C4.0 PARKING STALL (TYP.) SEE DETAIL C-5085/C4.1 DD D PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL C-5028/C4.0 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN RAMP SEE DETAIL C-5023/C4.0 PROPOSED SIDEWALK PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL C-5002/C4.0 PROPOSED SIDEWALK PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL C-5002/C4.0 FD-6 RIM:1016.96 INV:1014.90 (6" 90° BEND) PROPOSED CLEANOUT SEE DETAIL C-3013/C4.0 PROPOSED 129 LF DRAINTILE AT 0.25% PROPOSED 147 LF ■ DRAINTILE AT 0.25% REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE STUB 5' FROM BUILDING. FIELD VERIFY DEPTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE STUB 5' FROM BUILDING. IE:1011.20. FIELD VERIFY INVERT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS SEE LANDSCAPE 8 AA/0 G PROPOSED CONCRETE SANITEA-1411' SITE UTILITY PLAN 1A/Rigs-x3 vv. INV. zz 16112.01 PROPOSED 62 LF S. INV. Ini2.08 DRAINTILE AT 0.25% SEE DETAIL C-3039/C4.0 PROPOSED SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SEE DETAIL C-5033/C4.0 /- NO PARKING AREA, SEE DETAIL C-5004/C4.1 NO PARKING AREA, SEE DETAIL C-5004/C4.1 ENTRANCE A • MODIFY EXISTING CATCHBASIN TO ACCOMMODATE NEENAH R-3501-TB CASTING. SET RE=1019.08. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL CONCRETE JOINTING SEE DETAIL C-5073/C4.1 xi PROPOSED THICKENED EDGE SEE DETAIL lo 1 PROPOSED 33 LF DRAINTILE AT 0.25% SEE DETAIL C-3039/C4.0 PROPOSED CLEANOUT SEE DETAIL C-3013/C4.0 -UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PER DOC. NO. 4240547 STORM SEWER PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) SEE DETAIL C-5030/C4.0 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE USING 6" INSERTA WYE SERVICE CONNECTIONS. lE=1014.44. FIELD VERIFY INVERT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES PROPOSED CLEANOUT SEE DETAIL C-3013/C4.0 PROPOSED 45 LF DRAINTILE AT 0.25°/0 SEE DETAIL C-3039/C4.0 INV:1016.17 (SE) SEE DETAIL C-3011/C4.0 PROPOSED 37 LF DRAINTILE AT 0.25% SEE DETAIL C-3039/C4.0 20" BOX ELDER PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL PROPOSED CLEANOUT SEE DETAIL C-3013/C4.0 32TEL POLE 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT NUMBER 15-435, DATED NOVEMBER 24, 2015 . BACKGROUND SURVEY ON THESE DRAWINGS IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO SURVEY AS THE BASIS FOR ALL PROJECT WORK. ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT NUMBER 2014.110 DATED JULY 28, 2014. 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS OF EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN 6. ALL WORK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF MEDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS. 7. ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P "EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES". THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 8. CATCHBASINS AND MANHOLES ARE SHOWN ON PLAN LARGER THAN ACTUAL SIZE. COORDINATE LOCATION OF MANHOLE COVER AND CASTING SO THAT IT IS PROPERLY LOCATED AT THE BACK OF CURBLINE FOR THE CURB INLETS OR CENTERED IN THE AREA AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN FOR THE AREA DRAINS AND MANHOLE 9. FLARED END SECTIONS (FES) ARE SHOWN ON PLAN LARGER THAN ACTUAL SIZE. ALL PIPE LENGTHS INCLUDE FES. CONTRACTOR/SURVEYOR TO STAKE THE END OF FES FOR 10. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AT STREETS AND SIDEWALKS PER CITY OF MEDINA AND MMUTCD REQUIREMENTS. 11. ANY WORK PERFORMED OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES MUST BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND ALL REGULATING GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND APPROPRIATE PERMITS MUST BE UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION AND/OR ABANDONMENT TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF MEDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS. 2. EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE TV, COMPUTER CABLE, FIBER OPTIC CABLE, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT 811 BEFORE 3. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. CLEAN PAVED ROADWAYS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING. STREET WASHING IS ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SHOVELING OR SWEEPING HAS REMOVED SEDIMENT. SEE CITY OF MEDINA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS 4. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE TOP OF PIPE AS FOLLOWS: A. 8.0' OVER WATERMAIN B. 8.0' OVER SANITARY SEWER C. 1.5' OVER STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS >' PROPOSED DECK PROPOSED STORM SEWER CATCHBASINS PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SECTION LINE EXISTING EASEMENT EX STK' EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EX SAN- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING TREES STORM SEWER SCHEDULE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE GRATE TYPE REMARKS SIZE CB-4 R-1792-FG INLET 48" ALL EXISTING INFORMATION INCLUDING ALL UTILITY INVERTS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR DETAILS FOR BUILDING FOUNDATION DRAINTILE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MATCH INTO EXISTING. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com CONSULTANTS Planners and Engineers Plymouth, MN 55441 763.559.9100 cp a) SIGNATURE / SEAL I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SIGNATURE TYPED OR PRINTED NAME LICENSE NUMBER CHECKED BY ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE SHEET NAME SITE UTILITY PLAN ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER C,5 7, - 0 • - SITE DEVOLITION GENERAL NOTES _� MANHOLE 112 �� © THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND REPRODUCED FOR REFERENCE ONLY FROM AN ORIGINAL SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, DEVOLTON LEGEND �j ` 7 —�i ' INC. '•••�: PROTECT TREES 2 • •t.9% cx _ IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR GRADING ON ANY SITE: UTILITIES `•• ' C2.D MUST BE LOCATED. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 1—800-252-1 1 66 OR 651—454-0002 • ��� TREE REMOVALS TO SCHEDULE UTILITY LOCATIONS FOR THIS SITE. [MS 21 6D.01 —21 6D.07] CURB REMOVALS o CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. �X CONCRETE REMOVALS •• C CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. SALVAGE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVERS FOR ; ' ALL SITE FEATURES DAMAGED BY CONTRACTOR, NOT SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED, SHALL BE }�k�k�(kX X II \ \ j O p \ \ •• INSTALLATION BACK INTO THE PROJECT REPAIRED/REPLACED BY CONTRACTOR TO OWNERS SATISFACTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AT DRIPLINE. ALL OVERHEAD/UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED SHALL REMAIN. REMOVAL OF PAVEMENTS AND CURBS INCLUDE REMOVAL OF BASE MATERIAL. DO NOT BEGIN CONSTRUCTION UNTIL RELATED TEMPORARY SITE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE — SEE CIVIL PLANS. DEMOLITION PLAN KEYNOTES ' O PROTECT BUILDING, STOOP, STAIRS — SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING FOR FOUNDATION AND FOOTING. (A /.,..„ %,,,4' 0 UTILITY PER AND DOC. NO. D' A 42 i INAGE 0547 O PROTECT EXISTING ABOVE GRADE AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 3 PROTECT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O 4 1 Or GREEN ASH 0 .0PROTECT CURB & GUTTER TO REMAIN. C SALVAGE CITY OWNED PAVERS FOR REINSTALLATION INTO PROJECT. © PROTECT EXISTING TREE(S) TO REMAIN. • • 0►, (B) 10" BL tip CK \ © 7 O REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REMOVE FULL DEPTH BASE MATERIAL. (8) REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO NEAREST CONSTRUCTION JOINT. U REMOVE TREE(S) AND VEGETATION — INCLUDING ALL STUMPS, ROOTS, AND BRUSH. TREES STUMPS TO AND TO FOR WALNUT 0 BE SALVAGED DELIVERED OWNER . ,,.., (CI —41'� /� �� „� % 8 � e® M A P LE , EXISTING STOR SEWER TREE PRESERVATION 0 s (�) ! 0 \• i.,,� 18) -i'8�� 0 \ BLACK i DESIGNATED TREES INDICATE THE SIGNIFICANT TREES LOCATED ON SITE. OTHER TREES AND AND TREES INDICATEDSIGNIFICANT BYTREE. THE TREE LINE ARE NOT LARGE ENOUGH OR OF A SPECIES TO BE CONSIDERED A WALNUT _ Tree Preservation Plan 1 Total Tree Inches on Site: 194 Tree Removal Allowed by City(20%): 38.8 Tree Removal Actual: 126 l Mitigation Tree Inches: 87•2 • • , Trees to Save O�,� • 0 Tree # Size(Inches) Species D 36 Black Walnut ♦ E 32 Black Walnut DER,` Total 68 (El 321\i— • Trees to Remove BLACK Tree # Size(Inches) Species • 1p/ALN UT A 10 Green Ash ••�-1 B 10 Black Walnut C 8 Maple F 10 Maple F) G 16 Black Walnut �. 4. 0 ' � H 10 Ash M LE• • I 22 Spruce Q v/ii ��j 6 J 10 E I m .....1+►/ 11 \ C K 30 Ash I WALNUT Total 126 sa i i Z O � k /� ��� LLI 6 8 \— 0 0 A H 67 ( K w 'w w 30 � A. w 0 .. /' 4 H . 0 . ( I © ` / 0 Ali P LAN • 1� • i�•• • \ 7 = ' /)=. • • :,. �� is 22 4., •.4 :. TREE DRIPLINE �' • �•� • • z PR C•. •... � e ... �i► V cc) • N. co I— t ��.',•,.;.:•'•. •v ;... •.. ,�,l� }, .i -..-.L•• e , FENCE OUTSIDE OF I — DRIPLINE U CL 0 3 �� . • • : tie' ti : . . ♦• :. Cn W 20" BOX ' • • • •�••�'' EXISTING TREES TO BE Z ►� . 0 �0 ELD•R .' ELEVATION ��� 1, PRESERVED U ` PAV © ER O I/ o� . u � TREE DRIPLINE A/ j Z r♦ ,, VJ 0�����f�������I O /� © V V v -12 o u o_ u o c oU , , SURMOUNT.c. EL `O u r� �u o•LL �� .. u u >0.._ _ _ u V� _v v RBA"D 1��y law.....,•' CUTTER r ' Z ■ v EXISTING ING III I I I 1 II I I' I 11111 1 I 1 111111- FENCE - _ _ a WgTER-`vinklr ►far I O MAIN 0 BATCH v--W, TEL BtiS/�� CL MANH POLE OLE ERECT PROTECTIVE FENCE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. DO NOT STORE ANY EQUIPVENT OR IVATERIALS WITHIN THE PROTECTED �-�� z AREA. REMOVE THE FENCE ONLY AFTER CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS E ,- — ARE COV PLETED. w 1 SITE DEMOLITION & TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PROTECTION CL p_ 2o® SCALE: r�-2®� 10' 40' ��•® NOT TO SCALE 0' 20' IMM ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD& RYDEEN, INC ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING TECHNOLOGY INTERIOR DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com © ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS VIA Planners and Engineers 763.559.9100 2300 Berkshire Lane N, Suite 200 www.vaaeng.com Plymouth, MN 55441 info@vaaeng.com DRAWN BY JML CHECKED BY RJS ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME SITE DEMOLITION TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER L2.0 CL,300 SCALE: SITE LAYOUT PLAN MAIN FLOOR FFE 100'-0" = 1030.0' LOWER LEVEL FFE 87'-0" = 1017.00' (9) 10 11 12 K2P 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 25 26 27 (2 8) 29 30 O DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: ZONED: UH-2(UPTOWN HAMEL 2) SITE AREA: 25,895 SF MAX IMPERVIOUS: 90% PROVIDED IMPERVIOUS: 17,735 SF, 68.5% PARKING PROVIDED: 24 SPACES SITE LAYOUT KEY NOTES O O O PROPOSED BUILDING, SEE ARCH. PLANS CONCRETE STOOP/STAIRS — SEE ARCH. PLANS HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVING — SEE CIVIL C4—) 5' WIDE GRANITE SLAB STAIRS WITH GUARD RAILING CONCRETE BARRIER CURB & GUTTER GRANITE BLOCK RETAINING WALL O CONCRETE CURB — TAPERED END SECTION EXISTING CITY PAVER SIDEWALK — PROTECT SIDEWALK AND REPAIR DAMAGED PAVERS DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION BITUMINOUS EDGE — SEE CIVIL CONCRETE FILLED STEEL BOLLARD CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVERS TO MATCH CITY SIDEWALK INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVERS FROM SALVAGED CITY PAVERS CONCRETE POURED IN PLACE RETAINING WALL WITH GUARD RAIL — SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR HEIGHTS GUARD RAIL FENCE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH ACCESSIBILITY LOGO AND SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE WITH MARKED PAVEMENT AND SIGN EXTERIOR DECK CONCRETE — CONTROL JOINT CONCRETE — EXPANSION JOINT REINFORCED CONCRETE CONCRETE LOADING DOCK — SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRESSER TRAP ROCK DRIVEWAY MIX PAD TRASH ENCLOSURE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SLOPED CONCRETE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON CONCRETE STAIRS CONDENSING UNIT COOLER ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER SITE LAYOUT GENERAL NOTES ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL COORDINATES ON RADII ARE TO CENTER OF RADIUS. DIMENSIONS ARE TO PROPERTY LINE INTERSECTIONS, NOT IRONS SET OR FOUND. ALIGN EDGES OF WALKS WITH BLDG. WALLS AND/OR STOOPS AS SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE GRADING & UTILITY PLAN, FOR PAVEMENT GRADES AND SPOT ELEVATIONS. INSTALL GUTTER SLOPES TO MATCH PAVEMENT GRADE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL WORK IN THE R.O.W. WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, MN. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW MEDINA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS IN THE R.O.W. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT BEGIN CONSTRUCTION UNTIL RELATED TEMPORARY SITE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES C2 AROUND ALL TREES IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 2.0 COOPERATION WITH UTILITIES: THE PLANS SHOW ALL KNOWN UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE SURVEY, AND/OR THE OWNER, AND/OR THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES. THE ACCURACY OF THE PLANS IN THIS RESPECT IS NOT GUARANTEED. FOR UTILITIES AFFECTED BY THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE, IDENTIFY, DESCRIBE, AND SUBMIT RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AND THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY SHOWING LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES DIFFERING FROM THE PLANS OR DISCOVERY OF UNCHARTED UTILITIES. WATER LINES, SEWERS, GAS LINES, WIRE AND FIBER OPTIC LINES, SERVICE CONNECTIONS METER BOXES, VALVE BOXES, LIGHT STANDARDS, CABLEWAYS, SIGNALS, MANHOLES AND ALL OTHER UTILITY APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING ABOVE AND BELOW GRADE STRUCTURES, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE TO BE RELOCATED OR ADJUSTED ARE TO BE MOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR — OWNERS OF THE UTILITIES AT THEIR EXPENSE, EXCEPT AS NOTED ON THE PLANS, OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COORDINATION FOR THE PROPER SEQUENCE OF RELOCATION, ADJUSTMENT OR REMOVAL. LOCATIONS OF UTILITY SERVICES FROM THE POINT OF SUPPLY TO THE POINT OF CONNECTION WITH METERS, TRANSFORMERS OR OTHER PROJECT FACILITY SERVICE CONNECTION POINTS, EXCEPT SEWERS AND WATER, IF SHOWN, ARE SCHEMATICALLY LOCATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COORDINATION FOR DETERMINATION OF FINAL LOCATIONS, AND SEQUENCE OF INSTALLATION, DIRECTLY WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR COORDINATION AND SEQUENCING, DELAYS, INCONVENIENCE OR DAMAGE SUSTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR DUE TO INTERFERENCE FROM THE UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES OR THE OPERATIONS OF MOVING OR INSTALLING THEM. �1 A RMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com ©ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS Planners and Engineers 763.559.9100 2300 Berkshire Lane N, Suite 200 www.vaaeng.com Plymouth, MN 55441 info@vaaeng.com I DRAWN BY JL CHECKED BY RJS ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME SITE LAYOUT PL AN ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER L3.0 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN GENERAL NOTES (C7A _z co W SITE PLANTING PLAN L4.0 SCALE: 1"=110° r 10' 0 0 0 0 V V 0 0 0 V V b 0 0 0 V.0 0 V 0 0 V• 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 V V V 0 V V V V 0 20' 20" BOX ELDER )2 TEL POLE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING. DETERMINE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND PERFORM WORK IN A MANNER WHICH WILL AVOID DAMAGE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WHEN CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO PLANT GROWTH ARE ENCOUNTERED, SUCH AS RUBBLE FILL, ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, OR OBSTRUCTIONS. PLANT TREES AND SHRUBS AFTER FINAL GRADES ARE ESTABLISHED AND PRIOR TO PLANTING OF LAWNS, UNLESS OTHERWISE ACCEPTABLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF PLANTING OF TREES AND SHRUBS OCCURS AFTER LAWN WORK, PROTECT DAMAGE TO LAWNS RESULTING FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AND PROMPTLY REPAIR, AT NO COST TO THE OWNER, . DO NOT MAKE SUBSTITUTIONS. IF SPECIFIED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IS NOT OBTAINABLE, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ALONG WITH A PROPOSAL FOR USE OF EQUIVALENT MATERIAL. PROVIDE SEED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MULCH ENTIRE SHRUB BEDS AND ALL TREE SAUCERS WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MULCH MATERIAL TO BE MINIMUM 4" DEPTH. CONTRACTOR HAS OPTION OF GUARANTEEING PLUMB TREES THROUGH INSTALLATION AND 1 YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD IN LIEU OF STAKING AND GUYING. PROVIDE SOIL AMENDMENTS AT ALL TREE PIT AND SHRUB BED EXCAVATIONS CONSISTING OF 1 /3 PEAT OR MANURE, 1 /3 NATIVE SOIL, AND 1 /3 BLACK DIRT. DISPOSE OF SUBSOIL REMOVED FROM PLANTING EXCAVATIONS. DO NOT MIX WITH PLANTING SOIL OR USE AS BACKFILL. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS CLEAN AND WORK AREA IN AN ORDERLY CONDITION DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST, THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. PLANT SCHEDULE SHRUBS QTY SYM COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMES SIZE ROOT REMARKS 1 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 7' BB MULTI—STEM(3-5 STEMS) 6 AS DEGROOTS SPIRE ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Degroot Spire' 6" BB X 2 AS SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 3" BB X SHRUBS QTY SYM COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMES SIZE ROOT REMARKS 5 CS ISANTI DOGWOOD Cornus sericia 'Isanti' 18" HGT. #5 CONT. X 7 CA AMERICAN HAZELNUT Corylus americana 24" HGT. #5 CONT X 33 MS SILVER FEATHER GRASS Miscanthus sinensis 'Silberfeder' 24" HGT. #5 CONT, X 17 RR WINNIPEG PARKS ROSE Rosa 'Winnipeg parks' # 1 CONT. X PERENNIALS QTY SYM COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMES SIZE ROOT REMARKS SPIDERWORT 7 LS Tradescantia 'Blue & Gold' FULL FORM # 1 POT X LANDSCAPE PLAN KEYNOTES O METAL EDGING © RIVER ROCK MULCH © DRESSER TRAP DRIVEWAY MIX DO BARK MULCH 2 L4.0 EO SAVANNA SEED MIX SODDING, SEEDING AND V ATERIALS SCHEDULE + + + + SAVANNA SEED MIX — WOODLAND EDGE/ SAVANNA MIX + + + + + + + + FROM PRAIRIE NURSERY— WITH EROSION MAT ON AREAS OF LESS THAN 10% AND EROSION MATTING ON STEEPER AREAS AND STRAW ON OTHER AREAS. BARK MULCH— DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH INSTALLED 4" DEEP ROCK MULCH — 1-1/2" RIVER ROCK ON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALLED 3" DEEP. INSTALLED UNDER ALL AREAS 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 0 0 o DRESSER TRAP DRIVEWAY MIX — 4" MINUS DRESSER TRAP DRIVEWAY MIX ROCK CHIPS ON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BEGIN ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS UNTIL ALL DELINEATED WETLAND BOUNDARIES HAVE BEEN ACCURATELY ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 2 FEET FROM THE WETLAND EDGE IS PROVIDED AND APPROVED BY ALL LOCAL GOVERNING REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR COORDINATION AND SEQUENCING, DELAYS, INCONVENIENCE OR DAMAGE SUSTAINED TO THE WETLAND BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL PENATILITIES/FINES DUE TO WETLAND DISTURBANCE SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. �s nlll1112lllllllllllllllllumn, nIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIiilllllllll�llliiln. BALL DIA + 12" MAINTAIN 2" BETWEEN BASE OF PLANT AND MULCH TOP OF ROOT BALL SHALL BE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE BEFORE BACKFILLING CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE AND/ OR WIRE FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. 4" LAYER OF MULCH (ENTIRE BED) 6" SAUCER AROUND PIT EXISTING GRADE TRENCH, VERTICALLY CUT EDGE. PLANTING MIXTURE, SEE SPECS. LOOSEN SOIL, 8" MINIMUM 6.42.6D SHRUB &PERENNIAL PLANTING z1 l 1=m 1=111=1 i 1=111- 1E111=111E111E111= -111E111E111E111=11 I I-1 I I —I 1 1I—III—III—I I GRAVEL— SEE MATERIALS SCHEDULE FOR TYPE AND DEPTH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SCARIFY TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE AND TEMPER SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AS SPECIFIED GRAVEL SURFACE DETAIL 111=111 " 111=111 y 111= 111E111E111E111=11 III —III —III —III —I 1I— GRAVEL — SEE MATERIALS SCHEDULE FOR TYPE AND DEPTH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SCARIFY TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE AND TEMPER SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AS SPECIFIED r-4. � RIVER ROCK SURFACE DETAIL 13, A RMSTRONG TORSETH S KOLD & RYDEEN, I NC ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com ©ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS VA4 Planners and Engineers 763.559.9100 2300 Berkshire Lane N, Suite 200 www.vaaeng.com Plymouth, MN 55441 info@vaaeng.com 0 m M O � N C cri � N C3 N N DRAWN BY JML CHECKED BY IRJ S ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME SITE PLANTING - PLAN ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER L4.0 ATS&q 30'-0" 20'-0" EXIT TO GRADE • Q 00c COOLER 443 SF V'-0" T. • UP 91'-0" �Aoo 1� RACK AREA QAooD CANNING 14'-10" BLDG SEC 1 \ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.0 EAST/WEST BUILDING SECTION UP TO MAIN FLOOR 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" ;i • a 7 * 87'-0" i RAMP UP 3' (15%) UP A003 MECH/ELEC 90'-0" Caoo, LOADING BAY 18'-0" LOADING DOCK A OHD6 EXIT TO GRADE L— J 14'-10" `� 30'-0" �� 20'-0" �J 18'-0" i 131'-2" ROOF PEAK 121'-2" UNDERSIDE OF TRUSS 111'-4" MEZZANINE LEVEL 100'-0" MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 90-0" LOADING BAY 87-0" LOWER LEVEL i x x� x q 1000] EXTERIOR DECK OHD1 I I u I I I I I I I a r-- N _ 0 L _ _ I 7 7--1 A102 TAP ROOM 10� BAR AREA E101 EXTERIOR DECK OPEN TO BELOW MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN DN TO LOWER LEVEL 7 ii a UP TO MEZZ 00 L— T- — — 1 ,1 I. IIIIIII I IIIIIII 10o-D\ I I, I u 1VIM 14. 11 I� II II to LII I �A10) 01 I KITCHEN 748 SF *100'-0" FGE 7 7 A1r0 VEST u 1111" ( 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 i iQ1o� I, 0 0 0 0 !1,---ter G� A107 III E102 LOADING DOCK LOADING BAY BELOW i 1 i 1 1 (-N00 2ND LEVEL SEATING 450 SF li 1 B UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A� 1/8" = 1'-0" z 0 U z U LL O LL 0 z 1 Q z J LJJ LL 0_ i ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD& RYDEEN, INC ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING TECHNOLOGY INTERIOR DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com © ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS DRAWN BY JDA CHECKED BY DSB ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN AND BUILDING SECTION ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER A3.0 ROOF PEAK MEZZANINE FIRST FLOOR • ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE IN WINDOW — LOADING DOCK PAINTED OR METAL SIGN (5"-0" x 4'-0") SIGN AND MENU TO BE DETERMINED WELL FOR LOWER LEVEL ACCESS HAMEL BREWING 22 HAMEL ROAD NORTH ELEVATION - VIEW FROM PARKING LOT 1 NORTH ELEVATION HAMEL BREWING 22 HAMEL ROAD EAST ELEVATION VIEW FROM DRIVEWAY 3 \ EAST ELEVATION HAMEL DECORATIVE FENCE BEYOND 11 I ell Ain N 0.4 11111 i i� l -----•-------•-------------------------.................................. SLOPED WALK FOR ADA ,ACCESS (ILL' FOREGROUND) - 40 we r 1t C. 11 a l +n 4ti. _ 1 �l l°rr• �•tP,+14 a` < - .o-� = js� ,._- " ' •„� M _agar-" ;6AA -•1�,y- -�' .; . am "...-. _.t?. •' arm- *�r,*f +e 1N'7 �yI; IL Y.,,."- ,. - two7. I`ilif:ri-- nisi r• 1J• 4 • - - 0- • LI B w > 6 to SP 4/ oar ILO • m - � ` • . r 10 4we, � :�' *PA --........ ------------SLOPE QC3'WN TO L©ADING POCK ----------------------------------- ROOF PEAK SHINGLE ROOF FOLD UP GLASS 'DOORS MEZZANINE DECORATIVE ENCE IN FOREGROUND ST FLOOR , HAMEL BREWING 22 HAMEL ROAD WEST ELEVATION VIEW FROM PATIO 2 \ WEST ELEVATION METAL SIGN (91-6" x 7"-0") CONCRETE STEPS UP TO STREET SIDE ENTRY HAMEL BREWING 22 HAMEL ROAD SOUTH ELEVATION - VIEW FROM STREET SOUTH ELEVATION SIDE ENTRY STREET SIDE ENTRY FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY EXTERIOR LIGHT LOCATIONS - TYPICAL CEMENT BOARD PANEL AND BATTON FINISH FROSTED GLASS IN FRONT OF BATHROOM SIGN FOR KITCHEN TENANT (TBD) ROOF PEAK MEZZANINE FIRST FLOOR ATS&t,!q ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD& RYDEEN, INC ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING TECHNOLOGY INTERIOR DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com Cc) ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS DRAWN BY JDA CHECKED BY DSB ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY ISSUE DATE JANUARY 15, 2016 SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ATS&R PROJECT NO. 15028 SHEET NUMBER A3.1 0 � M O if) 1111 N C N c:3 N Ccu ATSR, A RMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Stem:erg "O regc LID" fixture. type 3 cistrlp tion 8600 I,Tcns. ~etc. on 18 foot pole. wit 7 concrete Dcse PHOTO M ETRI+CS Current View .0.2 4/3 A4 .0.5 AA .0A .0A AA .0A AA 0.5 0.5 .0.5 ,0.3 .04 5 .0.7 09 1. , 1.2 t.0 .0.8 6 .0.3 .0.5 ,a.6 ,0 1.3 , L7 2 .3 1 ,0.4 ,22 .0.3 ,DA .5 .0.7 0.4 .0.5 , 0 .0. .0.6 .0.8 ,0. .0.6 .0.8 .0.4 ,0.5 ,0.7 AA . ,5 .0.6 , 0,8 .D.3 .0.4 .0.5 .0.6 D. .D.3 .0.4 .0 .0.5 .0.7 ,0.8 .D.3 .0.3 ,D.4 5 .0.8 .0.7 . 2 .0.3 .0.4 .0.4 .D.B .10.7 .0.2 .0.3 .0.2 .D.2 . 0.2 . .D.1 .0.2 .0.2 .0.3 .0.1 .0.2 ,0 .D.1 .0.1 .0,2 ,0.1 ,D.2 .0.1 0.1 .0.1 .D.1 .0.1 ,D.1 .0.1 : 0.3 `Q.� .0.6 :O.T 0.3 0. 0.6 0.8 .0.6 , • .2.7 .2.8 .2.5 .2.8 .2.8 2.4 .2.6 .2.7 2.4 .2.5 .0.5 .0.4 .0.5 ,0,5 .0.6 .0.7 02 .0.7 .0.6 .0.6 .0.6 .0.7 .0.8 .0.9 .0,7 .0.7 .0.7 .0.8 1.0 .0.8 .0.8 .0.8 .0. ,0.9 .0.8 ,0,8 1 ,0.9 A.8 AV AV .0.9 .0-9 ,1.0 .1. 1.0 .0.9 .0.9 .0.9 .1.2 I. r ,1.0 .0.9 .0.9 .02 • 01 AA Al .01 .0.2 .0.2 .0A AA AA AA .0.5 .0.6 ,D.7 Al Al ." , .0.5 AA .0. l .0/ AA OA AA 0.5 .0.4 , .3 ,D.2 .0.2 .0 0.1 1.3%'.7:41„i ,0.9 Al .1" AA .3 Al ,0A AA � • 0.0 ,0 7� 0:5 ,D. ,0.2 ,0.2 ,0.1 .1.2 .1.1 ;1.0 .0.9 .0.9 .0.9 ,1.¢ ,1.1 .2.7 .2.8 .2. ,2.5 .2.8 .2.9 .2.7 41 .4 .2.6 .22 .2A •�T 2• �1.8 ,,. 1.0 1.0 .0.9 .0.9 .0.6 �1,1.8•/w2. 5 „2.0 ,2.4 .2.7 ,2.7 ,2. L. 2. , 2.5 .2.8 .2.9 !'2.7 .2.4 .2.7 .2:8 .2- .02 .0,9 1.0 .1.0 1.0 .0.9 .1.0 ,1.1 .1.1 .1.0 .1.0 .1.4 ,1.2 .1.1 .1.1 ,1. .1.1 ,1.0 .1.2 ,1.0 1,0 .1.1 1.2 ,1.4 .1.8 .1.7 „�di.7 ;h F 1.3 as��x.x a 2.4 .2.8 .2.7 .2.5 .2.8 .2.9 ,0.9 1.D ,12 .tt.51 .�.9�.2.4 .2.7 .2.8 .12 .0.0 .0:8 ,0.8 .0.8 .1. 1.2r,1.8 1 .2.5..2.6 2.2 ,D.3 ,Q ,0.5 .D.7 ;1i�8 .0.9 .0.8 .0.7 .0.7 .0.7 .0.7 .0.8 1.D G.a 1.0 ,0.7 1 1.0 .0.7 1.3 j A.9 ,0.6 .0.2 D13 0.3 0.4 �.5 At ,0.8 AlAl Al .01 .01 .01 .0.5 .0.5 .0_d .01 ,0.8 i.p ;y2+�'1�^1 40 .0.2 Jl .112 .0.3 ,0A , . , ,0. , .5 ,0.4 1. .0.4 .0: 5 .0.8 .0.7 .0.8 " u.s ,� 8 ,0.8 .0.7 .�,0A .01 0.2 .0.2 .D.1 .0.2 .0.1 .0.2 .0.2 0.2 .0.2 0.2 ,0.2 0.4 .0.3 .3 .0.2 0.5 .D.4 ,0 .0.2' 0.5 .0.4 .0.3 .0.2 ,0.4 .0.3 .D.3 D.5 .0.4 .0.3 .0.4 .0.3 .0.4 .0.3 .D.4 ,D.3 .0.4 .0.3 .0.4 .0.3 ,0.4 .0.3 0.2 ,0A ,0 ,0/ .0.7 .0.4 ,0.3f.0.2 .0.2 .0.2 ,D.1 Date 12/10/2015 Scale Not to Scale Drawing No. Summary 1 of 1 r 8501 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 TEL: 763.545.3731 FAX: 763.525.3289 WEB: www.atsr.com c� ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDEEN, INC. 2015 CONSULTANTS m DRAWN BY Ma I-IALGRIMSON CHECKED BY NA ISSUED FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 11, 2015 SHEET NAME ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ATS&R PROJECT NO.. 15028 SHEET NUMBER ES1 Agenda Item # 7C MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE: January 25, 2016 SUBJ: Baker Park Gully Project Study Background Commissioner McLaughlin and I attended the January 21st Pioneer Sarah Creek Watershed meeting. At the meeting we discussed a potential water quality project in Baker Park. The project might have the ability to address approximately 250 pounds of phosphorus that is currently going into Lake Independence. However, a feasibility report is needed to determine how much phosphorus can be removed. Two key projects are indicated in the subwatershed analysis that was completed by the City of Independence, the large gully in Baker Park (GS 50), and also NP 47 (stormwater pond project) as a related project to the GS 50 gully project. This is where Perkinsville Rd runs into 19, at the sharp curve south of the Baker Park campsites. I am working with Medina's Commissioner Mike McLaughlin and Independence's Commissioner Joe Baker, and Rich Brasch from Three Rivers on this project. Rich Brasch, at Three Rivers is leading this proposed project. There are 76 acres in total that make up the sub watershed of this gully. According to the analysis document created for the City of Independence, this sub watershed is responsible for adding 373 pounds of phosphorus per year to Lake Independence. The proposed projects could reduce the phosphorus amount by 250 pounds or more. Rich Brasch is working with Ed Mattiesen, at Wenck. In order to go after grant money to actually start the project, a preliminary study would need to be completed. Mr. Mattiesen has had great success getting grants for projects and completing projects. The cost to complete this study is estimated to be about $20,638. Three Rivers will participate with funding one quarter the study. Medina and Independence will also be asked to partner and participate financially with the study by funding one quarter of the cost. The amount for Medina to participate is $5,159.50. The Pioneer Sarah Creek Watershed agreed to fund $5,159.50 of the feasibility report. The approval is contingent on Medina and Independence contributing to the cost of the feasibility study and the watershed portion will be reduced by any grant funds received for the study. The $5,159.50 funding contribution is a major step forward for this watershed. They have only agreed to fund 10% in the past. I think this is a great opportunity for Medina to study this option. Commissioner Mike McLaughlin will be at the February 2nd meeting to discuss this opportunity in further detail and the cost participation requested from Medina. Council Action Requested: Approve funding from the Stormwater Utility Fund for $5,159.50 for the Baker Park Gully Project Study. vov WENCK ASSOCIATES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. January 11, 2015 Mr. Rich Brasch Natural Resources Director Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 Item 7a1 RE: Baker Park Reserve Campground Ravine Subwatershed Assessment Scope of Services and Budget Dear Rich: Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on the Baker Park Campground Ravine Subwatershed BMP Assessment. Project Understanding: I understand that the Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) and others are interested in stabilizing an eroding channel adjacent to the campground in Baker Park Reserve , which discharges to the south shore of Lake Independence. Most of the 80 acre contributing watershed is split between, the City of Independence and the City of Medina, with a small portion lying within the City of Maple Plain. Almost all of the land in the City of Medina is within Baker Park. The Lake Sarah and Lake Independence Stormwater Retrofit Analysis identified the ravine (Site GS-50) as a significant source of TSS and TP loading to Lake Independence and proposed improvements to stabilize the ravine that appear very cost-effective. The improvements were focused on improvements within the ravine itself. This study would dovetail with that effort by looking at the potential opportunities in the contributing watershed to reduce storm water - driven inputs to the ravine closer to the source. It is anticipated that once identified, any reasonable and feasible BMP projects identified could be undertaken as new development or re- development (including road re -construction) occurs in the contributing watershed to maximize their cost-effectiveness. The channel stabilization will be completed in two phases. 1. The first phase will be Identifying Potential BMPs in the contributing watershed that will reduce runoff rates, runoff volumes, and pollutant loads discharging to Lake Independence. 2. The second phase will be Channel Stabilization. This scope of work and budget is for the first phase. Project Scope/Approach: Phase 1 - Identifying Potential BMPs Wenck will work with a project team comprised of 1-2 representatives from the cities of Independence and Medina and possibly Maple Plain along with TRPD to develop a list of potential BMPs throughout the watershed that will cause reduced flow rates and runoff volumes Wenck Associates, Inc. I 1800 Pioneer Creek Center I P.O. Box 249 I Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-479-4200 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com Mr. Rich Brasch Natural Resources Director Three Rivers Park District January 11, 2015 vsitm 7a1 WENCK ASSOCIATES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. to the Baker Park campground ravine. The proposed BMPs, in turn, will have the benefit of reducing ravine erosion and lessening sediment and phosphorus discharges to Lake Independence. It is anticipated that Wenck will contract directly with TRPD for these services, and that the role of the other organizations to technically and financially support this project will be spelled out in a cooperative agreement between TRPD and those organizations. Wenck will use available data from TRPD, the cities, and a site review to build HydroCAD and P8 models that calculate flow rates, runoff volumes, pollutant loads and in -channel velocity, depth and shear stress. During the site review and model development, BMP options will be considered for insertion into the HydroCAD and P8 models to evaluate their effectiveness. During a January 7, 2016 meeting at the Wenck Maple Plain office Joe Baker noted three potential BMP's he'd like to have included in the analysis: 1. Either treatment of or transfer of runoff from the residential area bounded by Highway 19 and Sycamore Trail to Katrina Lake, 2. Construction of a storm water pond in the southwest quadrant of Highway 19 and Perkinsville Road and 3. Several rain gardens or side channel interceptions to treat and/or divert flow on the east/west running section of Highway 19. The best BMP or several BMPs will be selected for each subwatershed through an analysis of their construction cost, operation and maintenance cost, land acquisition/ownership, and relative benefit. One summary sheet will be prepared for each subwatershed. A meeting will be held with the project team to review the potential BMP options and a final report will be completed after the BMPs are selected. Task Descriptions: 1. Review of subwatershed report. Wenck staff will review the subwatershed assessment information for subwatershed GS-50 presented in the Lake Sarah and Lake Independence Stormwater Retrofit Analysis to determine their level of comfort with the technical approach taken and the estimated load reduction potential presented in that report. Wenck will discuss their findings with the project team in a conference call if necessary. 2. Kick-off meeting. A meeting will be held with the project team and Wenck with the purposed of reviewing the scope of work and schedule, present available data, and discuss other coordination and project matters. At this meeting Wenck will have a preliminary construction cost estimate for the BMP options of a storm water pond at the southwest corner of Perkinsville Road and Highway 19 and a flow diversion for the Sycamore Trail residential area to Katrina Lake. 3. Existing conditions HydroCAD model. The best available information from TRPD, the cities, Hennepin County GIS, and a site inspection of the watershed will be used to delineate sub -watersheds and construct an existing conditions hydrology and hydraulic model to calculate flow rates and runoff volumes. Wenck anticipates the assessment will include 10 subwatersheds. ZAPioneer-SarahCreek\CIPACIPs Independence\Baker Park Camprground Ravine subwatershed assessment SOW.docx 7 Mr. Rich Brasch Natural Resources Director Three Rivers Park District January 11, 2015 WENCK ASSOCIATES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. 4. Existing conditions P8 water quality model. The information used to generate the HydroCAD model will be used to produce a water quality model that determines the pollutant removal for each current and proposed BMP. 5. Proposed condition HydroCAD model. The existing HydroCAD model will be expanded to include potential BMPs. The flow rates and runoff volumes will be compared to determine the effectiveness of each current and proposed BMP. 6. Proposed condition P8 model. The existing P8 model will be expanded to include potential BMPs. The sediment and total phosphorus pollutant loads will be compared to determine the effectiveness of each current and proposed BMP. 7. BMP meeting. Wenck will compile the proposed BMPs by subwatershed, estimate construction costs, O&M costs, and life cycle costs per pound pollutant removed and present the information to TRPRD. The feedback from the project team will be used to finalize the proposed list of BMPs. 8. Finalize the HydroCAD and P8 models with BMP modifications based on the feedback from the project team. 9. Final subwatershed assessment report. A final report with modified BMPs, updated costs, hydrology and water quality benefits will be prepared and presented to the project team. The report will include an estimate of the flow volume as well as the total watershed loads of TSS and TP contributed from each jurisdiction (the cities as well as TRPD) under current conditions, taking into account the effect of any BMP's already installed. Budget: To provide the services outlined above, Wenck proposes a project budget of $20,638. On behalf of the 250+ employee -owners of Wenck, thank you for this opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you have any questions, or need clarification of anything presented in this proposal, please do not hesitate to call me at 763-479-4208. Sincerely, Wenck Associates, Inc. Ed Matthiesen, P.E. Project Engineer, Principal Z:\Pioneer-SarahCreek\CIPs\CIPs Independence\Baker Park Camprground Ravine subwatershed assessment SOW.docx 3 Z:\Pioneer-SarahCreek\CIPs\CIPs Independence\Baker Park Camprg round Ravine subwatershed assessment SOW.docx Item 7a2 Three Rivers Park Reserve District EAM 1/12/2015 Baker Park Subwatershed Assessment EAM IP $195 $100 Task 1. Review of subwatershed report 2 4 1.1 Three construction cost estimates: Sycamore diversion, 2 6 Perkinsville Rd pond, Hwy 19 RG's 2. Kick off meeting 3 3 3.0 Existing Conditions HydroCAD Model 3.1 Gagther data: storm sewer layout, topo, parcel data/ownership, soils, 0.5 6 aerial photo, groundwater, TRPRD rain garden as -built, existing BMPs 3.2 Conduct site visit and watershed investigation 1 2 3.3 Delineate subwatersheds based on available data 0.5 4 3.4 Build existing conditions model 1 16 3.5 Run model and de -bug for 2, 10 and 100 year events 1 4 3.6 Calculate channel Q V ,a and depth for 2, 10 and 100-yr 0.5 2 3.7 Review model and results 2 1 4.0 Existing Conditions P8 Model 4.1 Build existing conditions model 0.5 8 4.2 Run and de -bug for annual precipitation record 0.5 2 4.3 Estimate channel recession rate and sediment and TP loading 0.5 2 4.4 Calculate total event and annual sediment and TP loading 0.5 2 5.0 Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Model 5.1 Insert potential BMPs into model, run and de -bug 1 8 5.2 Evaluate Q V ,a and depth for 2, 10 and 100-yr 1 4 6.0 Proposed Conditions P8 Model 6.1 Insert potential BMPs into model, run and de -bug 1 8 6.2 Evaluate annual sediment and TP loading 1 2 7.0 Meet with TRPRD do discuss preliminary results 7.1 Prepare draft preliminary BMP results by subwatershed 1 24 showing hydology and water quality benefits, construction and O&M costs 7.2 Prepare draft figures showing existing and proposed pollutant loads and 1 8 proposed BMP locations 7.3 Meet with staff to discuss preliminary results 3 4 8.0 Finalize the HydroCAD and P8 models 2 8 7.0 Final BMP Assessment Plan 7.1 Update BMP Assessment Plan, costs, figures 1 8 7.2 Review final report 2 4 7.3 Present final report to TRPRD 3 3 Tota I labor 32.5 143 Labor cost $6,338 $14,300 Total cost $20,638 PSCICIPsICIPs-IndependencelBaker Park Subwatershed Assessment 1-12-2016.pdf Item 7a3 Protert Profiles - Water and Sediment Control Basun Silc peril—Ia550-.$tadk Gross vanes, Nip rap, biovngmeerin,. revegetatron - Gully Segment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Erosion Severity Very Severe Severe Very Severe Moderate Severe Slight Severe Recession Rate (ft/yr) 1.5 0.4 1.5 IS 0.4 0.03 0.4 Lower Gully Area (sq ft) 6965 2106 7966 3197 3562 3209 5748 32753 Erosive Gully Area (sq ft) 1393 421 1593 639 712 642 1150 6551 Sediment Loss (tons/yr) 88.8 7.2 101.6 3.5 12.1 .8 19.5 233.5 TP Loading (Ibs/yr) 142.1 11,5 162.5 5.7 19.4 1.3 31.3 373.7 $/Ib TP removal/yr 539 $166 $39 $482 $155 $2,086 $148 $72 $/Ib•TSS removal/yr $31 $133 $31 $385 $124 $1,669 $119 $57 SiteSorn ry—GSSD Water Body Watershed (acres) Lake Independence 76 City Medina Dominant Land Cover Residential, Park Average Slope (%) 7 Sediment Delivery Rate (%) 100 Project Life (yr) 20 Installation Cost ($) $425,789 Promo/Design/Adman ($) 545,500 Maintenance ($/yr) 565,500 fake Sarah and Lake Independence Stormwoter Retrofit Analysis ZAPioneer-SarahCreek\CIPs\CI Ps - Independence \Baker Park SWA Gully Stabilization #50.docx Item 7a4 Project Profiles — New Ponds & Iron Enhanced Sand Filters l a§ Initial Conditions 0.0 9.21 8593 22.40 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 ft 0.4 5.23 2353 21.67 3.98 6240 0.73 43.2% 72.6% 3.3% 8 ft 0.4 4.72 1330 26.64 4.49 7263 0.76 48.8% 84.5% 3.4% Water Body Lake Independence Treatment Watershed (at) 28.7 Dominant Land Cover Residential, Park Installation Type New Pond Installation Cost ($) $99,935 Promo/Design/Admin ($) $31,205 Maintenance ($/30yrs) $14,400 Land Acquisition ($) $9,600 Total 30 Year Cost ($) $155,140 Project Life (yrs) 30 $/Ib-TP removal/yr $1,151.74 $/Ib-TSS removal/yr $0.71 $/ac-ft volume removal/yr $6,804.37 Lake Sarah and Lake Independence Stormwater Retrofit Analysis PSCICIPsICIPS-IndependencelProposed New Pond #47.pdf MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: January 28, 2016 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates February 2, 2016 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Hamel Brewery Site Plan Review and CUP — 22 Hamel Road — 22 Hamel Road LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of a brew pub with food service. The applicant has also requested A CUP for an outdoor seating area. A Public Hearing was held at the January 12 Planning Commission meeting, following which the Commission recommended approval. Staff intends to present the request to the City Council on February 2. B) Enclave at Brockton 6rh Addition — Lennar has requested final plat approval for the final phase of the Enclave project. Staff is reviewing the submitted material and will present to the City Council when complete, potentially at the February 16 meeting. C) Tomann Preserve Lot Line Rearrangment — The City of Medina has requested approval of a lot line rearrangement between Tomann Park Preserve and property at 4003 Apache Road to add a wooded portion of property into the Preserve. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and will present to the City Council when complete, potentially at the March 2 meeting. D) Kal Point Site Plan Review, PUD Amendment — 340 Clydesdale Trail — Kalyan Vempaty has requested an amendment to the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD and a Site Plan Review to construct a commercial building containing a restaurant and upstairs office space on the final lot within Clydesdale Marketplace. Staff is conducting a preliminary review to determine if the application is complete for review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The Council reviewed on January 5 and directed staff to prepare resolution of approval, which will be presented after the applicant secures approvals for the proposed shared parking. E) Wealshire LLC Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Wealshire, LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of a 173,000 sf memory care facility. The request also includes a rezoning from RR-UR to Business Park and an Interim Use Permit to permit continued agricultural use of the portion of the property not proposed to be developed. The Met Council has also approved of the previous Comp Plan amendment. The Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning, site plan review and interim use permit at the February 10 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The City Council reviewed at the May 19 meeting and directed staff to prepare approval documents. The applicant has subsequently changed their proposed site plan which was presented to the Planning Commission and Council. The applicant is working on finalizing construction plans. F) 45 Highway 55 Rezoning — Steve Clough has requested that the City rezone property to the east of Aldi from Uptown Hame1-2 to Commercial Highway -Railroad. This zoning is the same as the Aldi site and the property to the west of Sioux Drive in the vicinity. The rezoning is in anticipation of commercial development of the site. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The Council adopted an ordinance approving the rezoning on January 19. The project will now be closed. G) Vickerman Right-of-way Vacation — 2982 Lakeshore Ave. — Michael Vickerman has requested that the City vacate the southern half of the adjacent right-of-way in which there are currently no street improvements. The City Council held a public hearing at the January 19 meeting and adopted a resolution approving the vacation. Staff will work with the applicant on the conditions of approval. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 February 2, 2016 City Council Meeting H) Bradford Creek Plat and ROW Vacation — 2872 Ardmore Ave. — Susan Prodahl, Carl Henderson, and Paul Henderson have requested plat approval in order to re -plat eight substandard lots in Independence Beach into two buildable lots. The applicants have also requested that the City vacate a portion of right-of-way to the north of the subject site in which there is currently no roadway improvements. Staff is conducting a preliminary review to deteonine if the application is complete for review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The Council adopted resolutions of approval on January 19. Staff will work with the applicant on the conditions of approval. I) Medina Mini -Storage Site Plan Review; Text Amendment — 4790 Rolling Hills Road — Highway 55 Rental Portable Storage, LLC has requested a site plan review to construct three additional mini - storage buildings. The applicant has also requested an amendment to the City's zoning code to allow fiber -cement ("Hardiboard") exterior building materials in the Rural Business and Rural Commercial Holding districts. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the October 13 meeting. The Commission supported fiber cement materials (lap siding only) in the RBH and RCH districts and recommended approval of the site plan review. The City Council adopted the ordinance on November 4 and adopted a resolution of approval on the site plan on November 17. Staff will work with applicant on the conditions of approval before construction begins. J) St. Peter and Paul Cemetery and Hamel Place —The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. K) Stonegate Conservation Design Subdivision, Woods of Medina, Capital Knoll— These preliminary plats have been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application L) Hamel Haven, Buehler subdivisions — These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before construction begins M) Wright -Hennepin Solar Panels — WH has requested a conditional use permit for the installation of a solar garden approximately an acre in area at their substation on Willow Drive, south of Highway 55. The Council adopted a resolution of approval at the June 16 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant to meet the conditions of approval before construction. Other Projects A) Comprehensive Plan —staff is preparing documents for the next Steering Committee meeting, which is scheduled for Wednesday, February 10 at 6 p.m. B) City Hall Lower Level Improvements — staff met with the architect and owner's representative to go over design elements for the office improvements Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 February 2, 2016 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p: 763.473-9209 f: 763.473-8858 non -emergency: 763-525-6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency 9.1-1 TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Director Edgar J. Belland DATE: February 2, 2016 RE: Department Updates Annual Report We have been collecting data for the 2015 annual report. We have requested information from the fire departments, analyzing our Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) data from Hennepin County Dispatch and running reports from our in-house records management system. We have a deadline of February 5th to have all the data collected. Police Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) Audit I was notified that our department was selected for a POST Board Audit. The audit reviews all training records related to mandatory policies and training. The auditor will be on site February 18, 2016. Holiday Train Re -Cap Meeting On Thursday, January 21, 2016, we had the re -cap meeting on the Holiday Train event. We had another record setting year for donations to the local food shelves. There was over $29,000.00 donated and just under eight tons of food. It was a very successful event. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson For the dates of January 13 to January 27, our officers issued 47 citations and 66 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of two driving while impaired arrests, nine traffic accidents, two medicals and four alarms. Over the past two weeks, I worked on finalizing two cases in relation to a fatal car crash and a serious injury accident from the summer of 2015. Both cases were forwarded to the Hennepin County Attorney's Office for charging consideration. In both cases marijuana was involved with the drivers and is believed to have caused the accidents. On January 18, 2016, Officer McGill took a car theft report from a business in Loretto. Since the time of the report, the vehicle was located in Minnetonka several days later being driven by a male from Rockford. This is the second auto theft from this location in the past six months with the same suspect being involved. Case forwarded to Investigations. On January 20, 2016, I assisted Officer Domino with a vehicle that she stopped that was wanted in connection with a theft from the Coborn's in Delano. The driver of the vehicle had an outstanding warrant for his arrest. The female passenger gave a false name and when her real identity was found, it was discovered that she also had an outstanding warrant for her arrest. A search of the female's property revealed several hypodermic needles that contained cocaine. Both subjects were arrested and transported to Hennepin County Jail. On January 20, 2016, Officers McKinley and Gregory were dispatched to a female that was slumped over the wheel parked on the side walk near Office Max. Upon arrival, it was discovered that the female was under the influence of some type of narcotics and was subsequently arrested. A search warrant was drafted for a sample of her blood. On January 21, 2016, Chief Belland and Officer Domino responded to an elderly female not breathing. Upon arrival, it was discovered that the female was deceased. The Hennepin County Medical Examiner was called and responded. On January 22, 2016, Officer Boecker took a theft of services report in Loretto. The business reported doing work on a vehicle and then not being paid. The suspect was contacted and stated that he was not going to pay the bill. The case was forwarded to the County Attorney's Office for charging. Criminal Investigations by Investigator Charmane Domino Vehicle was stolen from a local business and recovered a few days later in Minnetonka. Investigation to continue. Report of a local business employee that abruptly quit and took company property with him, including future contracts. Received a report of a juvenile committing sexual assaults. The suspect is known and has been accused of similar in the past. Investigation to continue. Currently working on a background check for a volunteer reserve applicant. Open cases currently under investigation: 13 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: January 27, 2016 MEETING: February 2, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • The frost is setting into the streets and you can feel the bumps as you drive down the roads. I am expecting it to get worse because of the excess moisture from the wet fall and early winter. • There have been several snow and ice events in the past few weeks. PW has been able to keep on top of them with minimal over time. • I have been working on evaluating the streets in the pavement management plan to prepare for the year ahead. • The Road Material Bid package for 2016 has been sent out and will be brought back to Council sometime in March. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • PW has been working closely with WSB to finalize the plans and specs for the well #8 / wellhouse #3 project. It is currently being advertised, with just a few items needing to be cleaned up on the plans. • Greg continues to install radio read boxes and enter the new homes into the reading system. • Linda and I are also working on filling out an online 2015 MCES Sewer Survey. • I am also working on gathering some quotes for the rehab of the Willow Drive Water Tower. This project will take a lot of public education and coordination with neighboring cities and fire departments. Water may be limited when the project moves forward. • Jack Gleason and I plan to attend the Annual Stormwater and Erosion Control seminar on January 27tn PARKS/TRAILS • The Public Works Department has been satisfied with our current mowing and spraying vendors for the parks. I am working to put together an extension of the services agreement if possible, rather than have to re-educate another group of contractors. • The skating rinks are all being used now that the cold weather is here, and the sliding hill has been a big hit as always. MISCELLANEOUS • Linda and I have been going back and forth with Bailey Nursery concerning the trees for Medina Cleanup Day, as some of the tree varities we had previously ordered were no longer going to be available. ORDER CHECKS January 20, 2016 - February 2, 2016 43915 KUMAR, RENU $250.00 43916 NARSIMHAN, ARVIND $150.00 43917 STUCKEY, RHONDA $250.00 43918 ALDI, INC. $7,000.00 43919 DAMYAN, ANDREY $1,000.00 43920 FARHAD HAKIM $2,000.00 43921 VOID $0.00 43922 JAIDKA, ANURAQ $450.00 43923 MEDINA GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB $5,000.00 43924 TU, THUY $150.00 43925 GARDING, CHRISTOPHER/VICTORIA $1,000.00 43926 HAMEL LIONS CLUB $525.00 43927 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED $10,010.75 43928 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC $48.50 43929 MN CITY/CO MANAGEMENT ASSOC $130.00 43930 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $400.00 43931 MN DNR ECO-WATERS $2,154.17 43932 MORRIS ELECTRONICS INC $262.50 43933 NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC $1,054.00 43934 QUALITY RESOURCE GROUP INC $109.46 43935 WSB & ASSOCIATES $49,442.25 43936 YAHOO CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS $40.00 43937 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $99.00 43938 ALLIED 100, LLC $224.00 43939 ASSN OF MN EMERGENCY MGRS $130.00 43940 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO $490.70 43941 BATTERIES + BULBS $66.60 43942 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $11.90 43943 CENTURYLINK $644.00 43944 COUNTRYSIDE CAFE $133.46 43945 DPC INDUSTRIES INC $1,082.81 43946 EARL F ANDERSEN INC $705.50 43947 ELM CREEK WATERSHED $17,190.28 43948 FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOC INC $85.00 43949 GALLS/QUARTERMASTER $77.94 43950 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $100.00 43951 GRAINGER $33.69 43952 HACH COMPANY $64.58 43953 HAMEL LIONS CLUB $575.00 43954 HAMEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT $68,053.75 43955 HOLIDAY FLEET $1,667.76 43956 INTL ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF POLICE $150.00 43957 INTL. ASSN. FOR PROP.& EVID $50.00 43958 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR $392.00 43959 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES $850.00 43960 LORETTO AUTO RECONDITION $814.36 43961 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE $629.15 43962 MARCO INC $29.21 43963 MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC $1,140.00 43964 METRO ALARM CONTRACTORS INC $170.00 43965 METRO WEST INSPECTION $22,328.89 43966 MINUTEMAN PRESS $2,945.62 43967 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN $671.90 43968 MUNICI-PALS $25.00 43969 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $271.09 43970 OFFICE DEPOT $521.41 43971 PIONEER -SARAN CREEK $14,808.68 43972 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL $295.00 43973 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC $7,276.10 43974 RYAN COMPANIES $21,067.20 43975 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL $537.90 43976 TARGET CORPORATION $33,981.66 43977 TEGRETE CORP $1,358.64 43978 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $485.36 Total Checks $283,661.77 *CHECK REISSUED ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS January 20, 2016 — February 2, 2016 003509E MINNESOTA, STATE OF $789.00 003510E PR PERA $14,773.23 003511E PR FED/FICA $16,029.28 003512E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,260.00 003513E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,346.15 003514E SELECT ACCOUNT $829.92 003515E CITY OF MEDINA $19.00 003516E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $20.00 003517E MARCO (LEASE) $854.60 003518E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $219.90 003519E PITNEY BOWES $123.00 003520E XCEL ENERGY $5,722.74 003521E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN $2,093.68 003522E KONICA MINOLTA $168.48 003523E DELTA DENTAL $2 604.60 Total Electronic Checks $49,853.58 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT January 27, 2016 506933 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. $1,314.63 506934 BARNHART, ERIN A $1,965.67 506935 BELLAND, EDGAR J. $2,522.48 506936 BOECKER, KEVIN D $3,161.86 506937 CONVERSE, KEITH A. $2,099.12 506938 DINGMANN, IVAN W. $1,751.39 506939 DOMINO, CHARMANE $1,766.60 506940 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,409.33 506941 FINKE, DUSTIN D $2,110.20 506942 GALLUP, JODI M. $1,667.32 506943 GLEASON, JOHN M $2,164.94 506944 GREGORY, THOMAS $2,116.93 506945 HALL, DAVID M $2,010.89 506946 JESSEN,JEREMIAH S. $2,237.70 506947 JOHNSON, SCOTT T $2,275.96 506948 KLAERS, ANNE M. $1,116.32 506949 LANE, LINDA $1,420.48 506950 LEUER, GREGORY J $2,053.89 506951 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,518.80 506952 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,328.00 506953 NELSON, JASON $2,621.05 506954 PETERSON, DEBRA A. $1,614.15 506955 REINKING, DEREK M $1,554.25 506956 SCHERER, STEVEN T $2,259.38 506957 VIEAU, CECILIA M $1,194.37 506958 WENANDE, BRANDON S. $541.72 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $47,797.43