Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2021.06.09 D Staup Fwd_ City Deer ConcernsFrom:Anette Spickard To:BessieJo Wagner Subject:Fwd: City Deer Concerns Date:Wednesday, June 9, 2021 4:45:49 PM From: Debra Staup <ikaria@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021, 3:16 PM To: Anette Spickard Subject: City Deer Concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To The City Council And City Manager, I have some serious concerns regarding our town deer. I feel we need to do a thorough job of exploring and researching safe, humane, and respectful options before any decision is made which could result in the unnecessary tragic deaths of our town deer. I am worried we are taking a knee jerk reaction instead of making sure all our ducks are in a row. Many of us love the deer and would prefer not to cause them any potential harm. Let us remember McCall is a mountain town and wildlife do live here. In fact, the wildlife was here long before any human. It was their habitat first! I came to McCall a lot as a youth, worked here in the summers as a young adult at the old YMCA Camp which is now Tamarack Bay Condos, and moved here full time over 46 years ago. The deer were living in the woods of what was then the outskirts of town. I know well that some deer thrived year round in the areas where Spring Mountain, The Woodlands, and Middle School are now. That land was home to an array of wildlife including deer, elk, bear, fox, raccoons, skunks etc. and also prized huckleberry bushes and morels. I spent winters cross country skiing through that area before it was developed and was blessed to see some of the deer wintering there. As our human population grew, we took over the land and built on the wildlife habitats without considering the long term consequences to their survival in their home range. Many of the old locals have lived here for years without issues with the wildlife. We realized we had to adjust in order to live in harmony in 'their' mountain habitat. Yet as our area grew, the surrounding land was bought and developed. This forced the deer and other wildlife to acclimate to the human intrusion in their historic range. A lot of residents and tourists do enjoy having the deer around, though others are complaining about their presence. Hopefully a reasonable, safe, humane, educated, and respectful compromise can be attained. I have done some research to see how other places dealt with their wildlife habitats being overrun by humans. Here is some of what I have found. Ordinances have been put in place prohibiting the feeding of wildlife such as deer, elk, moose, fox etc. These ordinances have been successful in other cities and states. Extensive and continued education for people must happen through all medias and appropriate businesses. The information should pinpoint the importance of not feeding the animals; proper securing of trash and when to put it out to be picked up, to keep pet food inside, place bird feeders high up in trees, plus slower speed limits are recommended. We have reasonable speed limits; we just need to get drivers to slow down and drive them. (I know our police do the best they can with limited resources, and the lack of enough officers is more than likely due to to a lack of housing options.) Education is key to the success of any venture. It is important to inform people of what are the best wildlife resistant plants to grow and/or sprays or other deterrents to use on plants if they are interested in keeping the wildlife out of their yards. The local nurseries would be valuable in helping those people make the best resistant plant and deterrent choices. Fencing off yards or putting fencing around trees and gardens have been most effective in preventing deer from browsing in yards. Also there are various types of fences to use depending on what one is looking for. A lot of old gardeners here know to use fences to keep all wildlife from eating their plants. Some places have established and managed a supervised feeding area of land outside of their respective towns. The feed used is approved by knowledgable wildlife experts to make sure it is what is best for the deer. The deer have a safe place to go; they are not being punished for a mistake they didn't create. We actually have a feeding program for our local elk at a ranch or two out in the Donnelly area to help sustain them through the winter. It would be great if we did the same for our deer. And if there are any truly sick or injured deer, F&G can respectfully and humanely take care of a deer if it can't be healed. By creating a feeding area, it would help decrease the problems some have with the deer being in town, especially during the winter. A feeding area could be set up on State Land or maybe enlist the cooperation/partnership of a private land owner. People could pay to see the deer being fed such as they do for the elk outside of Donnelly. Another thing some places have done is to plant more of the type of trees, bushes, and foliage the deer naturally eat in wooded areas away from town . The deer will go forage where there is a plentiful food source. So much of their natural food/foliage sources have been wiped out due to the development of their habitat and clearing of lands. It needs to be replaced in appropriate areas. Sterilization There are states who have tried sterilizing some of the female deer with some success. Though it comes with costs and stress to the deer. Trap and Relocate Studies show that about half of all deer trapped and relocated die from capture- related stress, injuries, or from wandering extensive distances after release resulting in increased highway mortality. Some wildlife sources speculate that the stressed deer are desperately trying to get back to their own range. Plus with so many people moving to and living in the woods and mountains these days, there are not many suitable places to release and relocate trapped deer. Just look at how much Valley County has grown and changed. Idaho has been discovered; so many small rural areas are growing faster than with which they can keep pace. The costs to trapping and relocating can range anywhere from $400 to over $3000 per deer. I wonder where all this money is going to come from? Taxpayer financed? Not to mention neighboring communities may not appreciate F&G releasing our deer in their territory. Trapping and Euthanasia involves the live capture of deer using box traps, clover traps, or different nets. Then they are usually shot, or a penetrative captive bolt is used, or they are injected with a pharmacological agent. The trapping and euthanasia is labor intensive and stressful for the deer and can cost more than $300 a deer. Again taxpayer financed? These last few methods are not at the top of my list for the obvious harm it causes, and I would strongly prefer my tax money going to education and humane preservation of the deer. I read several comments in the newspaper article in which I feel the need to respond. This thought that we will have a lot of dead deer around town during the winter if people quit feeding them is a bit over reactive, in my opinion. Yes, some deer will die regardless of where they feed in or out of town; natural attrition happens to all wildlife whether by injury, illness, starvation, predator, or old age. It is the cycle of life. Yet, keep in mind we have time to establish an appropriate winter feeding area to help out the deer. The deer, with possible help, will find their way to the established feeding areas just as the elk have done. It would great if we could give them a real chance to possibly reintroduce themselves to safer areas in their range for all concerned. Do note, many of the deer are not hanging in town as much in the summer because they are spread out enjoying their natural foliage. If we planted more foliage for them to eat in the woods and open areas during the spring, summer, and fall plus provide winter feeding areas for them, more than likely the situation will resolve itself naturally. It would be a win win for deer and people alike. Trapping and relocating them out of their own natural range will likely bring about more deaths of the deer due to stress and injury etc. That is wrong, and I don't want to see this happen. Most all the in town vehicle accidents with deer are usually caused by drivers going too fast and not paying attention to the road for many reasons including being on their phones, being drunk, and/or just in a big hurry to be somewhere. By following the speed limits and staying focused on driving most of the deer/vehicle accidents will be eliminated. Trust me, it is not the deer I see speeding down our roads every day in our town. Sadly, we don't have enough police officers to enforce the large amount of speeders racing up and down our streets. I do appreciate our police and know they are doing the best they can. I sincerely doubt the 'removal' of the deer will slow down the drivers. The lives of pedestrians and bicyclists are also at great risk by the recklessness of the speeding vehicles. Do we rid ourselves of the people walking or the bicyclists to prevent them from being hit? .. Seriously, drivers need to slow down and pay attention. As for the mountain lions, they have been wandering this range for longer than I have been here. I have seen mountain lions coyotes, bear, elk, moose, fox, even a wolf or two, etc. in my yard, neighborhood and/or in surrounding areas, though I have never heard or read of anyone being harmed by these animals in our community. Not to say it hasn't happened in McCall, but to my knowledge in all the years I have lived here, I don't recall any such incident. Again, we do live in the wooded mountain range of all kinds of wildlife. They wander in and out of Ponderosa Park, Little Lake area, and up around the north end of Payette Lake. Some hike through the Little Ski Hill area and Red Ridge. They can be found near Gold Fork, Paddy Flat, Brundage, Tamarack, and running through fields of the ranches where a lot of livestock are grazing. In other words, these animals are everywhere trying to exist alongside humans. I would like to think we aren't going to start a trend to eradicate wildlife every time they come through our community or when some person complains. It would be better to educate people on how to live with and respond safely in their interactions with wildlife. I was at Cascade Reservoir this last weekend enjoying some beach time as were many families. Posted on trees and day use areas were signs warning of a mountain lion being spotted in the area.. The signs clearly explained what to do if anyone encountered a mountain lion. I saw people reading the signs and calmly advising their children, yet no one chose to leave the beach or day use areas because of the mountain lion. Hopefully there will always be wildlife in our area; if we remove the deer, do we remove all animals from livestock, family pets, to other wildlife that could attract predators, or do we educate ourselves on how to reduce risks and to live in harmony with them in their territory? Any animal, domestic or wild, can become aggressive when they feel their space is being invaded, especially if they are protecting babies. The solution is simple. We have a leash law in town and in Ponderosa Park. Keep your dogs on leash when out and about. Otherwise, contain them in a fenced yard or in your house. Don't allow them to run loose. Even at many parks, on some trails, or wilderness areas in Idaho and other states, it is a requirement to keep dogs on leash at all times so as to not disturb the wildlife. When out walking your leashed dog and you encounter a deer or any other wildlife, just give them a wide berth. Do the same even if you don't have a dog. Give the animals space. I did just that when a bear and I met in Ponderosa Park. We made eye contact and gave each other space. I went one way and the bear went the other, both of us checking that neither one followed the other. Situation averted. We have a dog and an abundance of wildlife around our house and in our neighborhood. Never once has our dog been threatened or harmed by the wildlife. Common sense can prevent a myriad of problems. Animals do get lice at times; though I am not convinced it is necessary to kill all of them. I would like to see substantiated scientific proof regarding this issue. If there is actual 'absolute' proof that a deer or any other animal has 'deadly' lice or any other truly 'deadly' disease or injury, then humanely deal with that particular animal. I would like to hope it doesn't become the 'excuse' to get rid of the deer and other wildlife. Though I fear it will be. Our town deer are special to so many of us, including my husband and myself, and we deeply feel the deer don't deserve to be 'punished' by humans for living in their own habitat. We are the ones upsetting the ecosystem. We created the problem, so we should try and rectify it in a humane way and to turn it into a win win situation for the deer and for the people who both love the deer and those who have their differences with them or wildlife in general. I support an ordinance to stop feeding them. I am all for putting together a great education program to teach adults and children about the dos and don'ts in feeding the wildlife, deer resistant plants and deterrents, fencing, common sense tips on how to live harmoniously with wildlife, and other pertinent information. I feel very strongly about establishing a winter feeding area for our deer similar to the elk feeding one near Donnelly and planting lots more foliage for them to eat in appropriate areas during the spring, summer and fall. As a long time resident and voter, my tax money spent on humane preservation of our deer is money well spent. I believe more time and research are needed to make sure we put together a humane deer preservation management plan that will be a win for all. May I suggest a community task force group be formed to help iron out and put into place the best possible methods and strategies for navigating and managing this somewhat contentious situation. Have people from the community, wildlife experts from all over, and other people be on the task force. Invite knowledgeable people from other states to share their plans and experiences. It would help a lot to prevent any ill will felt by people regardless of where they stand. More importantly it may prevent a Pandora's Box of very unfortunate yet preventable consequences from being unleashed. If we don't slow down and do this right, I believe it will lead to the unnecessary and tragic death and/or killing of our deer and other wildlife down the line. Anger, hard feelings, and distrust will erupt which will take a very long time to heal and to repair. McCall is a beloved mountain community blessed with wildlife and beautiful nature; it is why most people move or visit here. We are not interested in living in an 'asphalt' forest. Let us be proactive not reactive. We need to repair and amend the harm we caused to our wildlife 'neighbors' and establish a respectful plan to safely preserve their existence here in 'their home range'. To do otherwise would be a travesty. I want to have confidence and trust that our City Council and other officials will have the wisdom to pause, to take the time to do more research, and to consider better options before moving ahead... We share this land with the indigenous wildlife, let us become the example of how to live in harmony and peace with them. Thank you, Debra Staup Retired Educator