Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022.01.27 Regular Meeting MinutesMINUTES McCall City Council Regular Meeting McCall City Hall -- Legion Hall VIA TEAMS Virtual January 27, 2022 Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Agenda Consent Agenda Public Comment Reports Public Hearing Business Agenda Adjournment CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 1 Mayor Giles called the regular meeting of the McCall City Council to order at 5:30p.m. Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, Council Member Nelson, Council Member Nielsen, and Council Member Thrower all answered roll call. City staff members present were Anette Spickard, City Manager; Bill Nichols, City Attorney; BessieJo Wagner, City Clerk; Erin Greaves, Communications Manager; Linda Stokes, City Treasurer; Brian Parker, City Planner; Kurt Wolf, Parks and Recreation Director; Eric McCormick, Golf Course Superintendent; Traci Malvich, Human Resources Manager; Vlatko Jovanov, Network Administrator; Dallas Palmer, Police Lieutenant; Bill Punkoney City Attorney Also, in attendance were Dr. Patrick Kinney, St. Luke's Health System; David Gallipoli, Member of the Public; Joey Petri, Member of the Public; Rick Fereday, Member of the Public; Sarah Lenda, Concessions Applicant; Amy Manning, III -A Representative. Mayor Giles led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVE THE AGENDA Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a voice vote all members voted aye, and the motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA Staff recommended approval of the following ACTION ITEMS. All matters which are listed within the consent section of the agenda have been distributed to each member of the McCall City MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 1 of 15 Council for reading and study. Items listed are considered routine by the Council and were enacted with one motion. 1. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — September 23, 2021(ACTION ITEM) 2. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — November 18, 2021(ACTION ITEM) 3. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes — December 2, 2021(ACTION ITEM) 4. Payroll Report for period ending December 24, 2021 (ACTION ITEM) 5. Warrant Register — GL (ACTION ITEM) 6. Warrant Register — Vendor (ACTION ITEM) 7. AB 22-026 City Licenses Report to Council Per McCall City Code Per McCall City Code Title 4 Chapter 9, the City Council has determined the City Clerk shall be delegated the authority to process and grant or deny all alcoholic beverage license applications, other than certain circumstances involving catering permits, which the City Clerk shall review the application for catering permit for completeness and forward said application to the Police Chief. The Police Chief upon receipt of the application shall make a recommendation to the City Clerk to approve or deny the application. Whenever the City Clerk shall determine that an application for alcoholic beverage license transfer or renewal is complete, the City Clerk shall approve or deny such application. All decisions of the City Clerk shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after such decision. The City Clerk is also responsible for all processing of business, taxi, snow removal, pawnbroker, child daycare licenses, vendor permits, and public event applications. Action: Council to review the License report. 8. AB 22-021 Request to approve agreement with Idaho Commerce for Idaho Community Development Block Grant #ICDBG 21 -III -16 -SR Idaho Commerce has awarded the City of McCall an Idaho Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $225,000 to support improvements to the Senior Center parking lot, including consolidation of the 1St Street drive access to the south of the Senior Center facility and removal of the northerly access drive to improve safety. The parking lot surrounding the Senior Center will be fully resurfaced, striped, and signed. The grant agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney. The match requirement ($185,500) articulated under Pt.3 of the agreement will be met and exceeded by the $338,765 contract approved by Council on January 13, 2022 (AB 22-018) for Senior Center building and envelope improvements. Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Idaho Community Development Block Grant Agreement in the amount of $225, 000 to support Senior Center parking and site access improvements. 9. AB 22-028 Treasurer's Report as Required by IC 50-208 Review Treasurer's report of accounts and activity of office during the month of December 2021 regarding care, management or disposition of moneys, property, or business of the City. Action: The Council shall examine the report and determine whether additional information from the Treasurer is required. Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Council Member Maciaszek seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Maciaszek, Mayor Giles, Council Member Nelsen, , and Council Member Thrower all voted aye, and the motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT 1 Mayor Giles called for public comment at 5:34 p.m. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 15 Eight (8) written comments were received related to a code amendment addressing Gas stations in the downtown and one (1) comment related to an article regarding workforce housing and are included as Attachment A. David Gallipoli, 200 Scott Street McCall, Idaho, spoke in person at the meeting. Mr. Gallipoli thanked City Staff for negotiating through the difficult time of Covid and voiced some concerns. Mr. Gallipoli noted his personal opinion in regard to the changes made to Council meetings in response to Covid. Stating some people in the community do not have access to the Internet, the streaming technology challenges some, some do not have connection speeds to watch or participate in council meetings, and some are fearful of gatherings. Mr. Gallipoli noted his opinion of approval processes needing to be put on hold until Covid winds down unless it is an emergency. Another issue Mr. Gallipoli commented on was a proposal for a building moratorium, referencing the letter he wrote that was published in the Star News. Mr. Gallipoli also commented on the need for the City to discuss the Brundage Mountain plans to build huge subdivisions even though the subdivisions are out of City jurisdiction. Rick Fereday, 315 Burns Rd McCall, Idaho, spoke virtually at the meeting. Mr. Fereday commented on short term rentals noting his thoughts on taxing short-term rentals at a higher rate than the Local Option Tax is currently set at. Mr. Fereday also requested the Council look at the issue of side -by -sides creating safety issues on City streets. Mr. Fereday added to his comment, opposing the concessionaire's agreement in front of Council tonight. Joey Pietri, 225 Valley Springs Rd, Spoke in person at the meeting. Mr. Pietri noted that he echoed the sentiments of the previous public comments. Mr. Pietri added opposition to the Maverick being allowed to put a new gas station in at the current proposed location, suggesting a solution on the outskirts of town instead of on the main strip. Hearing no further comments, Mayor Giles closed the comment period at 5:38p.m. REPORTS 1 Covid-19 Update from Chief Williams and St. Luke's Dr. Kinney Police Lieutenant Dallas Palmer presented the Covid-19 update to Council stating that Central District Health returned to optional crisis standards of care as of Monday and St. Luke's Health System is opting to continue regular standards of care. The current positivity rate has decreased from 47% two weeks ago, down to 30%. The CDC is forecasting for increases over these next few weeks, possibly doubling numbers. City employees have been affected by Covid, either from exposure or from Covid itself. City services have remained constant, the City is still providing curbside service or by appointment only service. Dr. Patrick Kinney from Saint Luke's Health System gave an update from the hospital. The community has a massive blood shortage, Dr. Kinney encouraged the community to donate. There are over 200 patients hospitalized in the Saint Luke's health system with Covid. There were 565 positive tests done at the McCall Saint Luke's in January, that does not include at home tests or test done in Cascade. Dr. Kinney stressed the importance of getting the vaccine and continuing to wear masks. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 3 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Council Member Nelson asked Dr. Kinney if there is any indication as to how long we will stay at peak levels in Idaho and Valley County. Dr. Kinney noted that using what is known about the way this virus transmits and watching the way the virus has moved through hospital systems all over the world; Omicron is a flash flood it is not the kind of forest fire that was seen with the Delta variant. Omicron spreads incredibly quickly and effectively. Current data suggests Idaho is going to be on the way back down by the end of the first or second week of February. Dr. Kinney stated that Idaho has a horrible vaccination rate, one of the 44 lowest states in the nation. Idaho has also had a lot of positivity creating an unknown number of residents with natural immunity. Council thanked Dr. Kinney. AB 22-022 Idaho Independent Intergovernmental Authority (III -A) Insurance Group Annual Report to Council Amy Manning from III -A presented to Council. The Idaho Independent Intergovernmental Authority (III -A) provides medical, pharmacy, and vision benefits for eligible City employees. Council approved a membership agreement with the III -A in August of 2018 which renews annually automatically. If the City were to decide at some point to opt out of renewal, III -A must be notified by June 30th at 5pm of any given year. Then, the City would be termed effective September 30th of that year. III -A provides each member agency's governing board or council with a report each year detailing the prior plan year. The annual report for the Trust which included total membership numbers, financial reports, benefit enhancements, and future goals. Council Member Nelsen shared appreciation for III -A's innovative efforts and Council thanked Ms. Manning for providing a detailed report. PUBLIC HEARING 1 Council Member Thrower recused herself from the Public Hearing. AB 22-015 Request to Approve Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan (PUD-21-01) and Subdivision Preliminary Plat (SUB -21-04) at 116 Thula Street for Rywest Homes, Inc. At 6:24pm Council Member Nielsen moved to open the public hearing for Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan (PUD-21-01) and Subdivision Preliminary Plat (SUB -21-04) at 116 Thula Street for Rywest Homes, Inc. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. In a roll call vote Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Nelsen, Mayor Giles, and Council Member Maciaszek all voted aye, and the motion carried. Council Member Thrower was the only Council Member to recuse from the hearing. Planner Parker gave a brief overview of the legal documents and a recap of the continuation from the previous meeting. The Planned Unit Development and Subdivision Preliminary Plat application provided is to construct 26 condominium units. During their regularly scheduled November 2, 2021 meeting, the McCall Area Planning and Zoning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing and unanimously recommended approval of the subject application to the McCall City Council without a second public hearing. The subject application includes requests to enter into development and escrow agreements. Final versions of these agreements will be MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 4 of 15 presented to Council at a later date. Council had no objections to admitting the documents to the record. Staff recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Prior to any site work or disturbance, the applicant shall receive final engineering approval. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall conduct a consultation with the City Arborist and provide a tree protection plan in conformance with the City of McCall's Tree Protection standards. 3. Prior to the submittal of a final plat and final development plan application, the applicant shall provide a revised preliminary development plan showing a minimum of six (6) long term bicycle parking spaces and two (2) short term bicycle parking spaces located near the buildings. 4. Prior to the submittal of a final plat and final development plan application, the applicant shall provide a revised preliminary development plan and landscape plan showing a curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to Thula Street. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the submittal of a final plat and final development plan application. 5. All buildings shall include additional soundproofing that will ensure a maximum 60db interior noise level. 6. Prior to the submittal of a final plat and final development plan application, the applicant shall provide a revised preliminary plat with a note stating that the McCall airport exists, flight paths may be above the property, and that noise may be generated as a result of airport operations. 7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) findings for incompatible use be enacted (please see the attached Definitions for the FAA description of Form 7460-1). 8. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall enter into an Avigation Easement with the City of McCall. 9. Prior to the submittal of a final plat and final development plan application, the applicant shall submit construction plans for a bicycle and pedestrian pathway from Thula Street to the existing bicycle and pedestrian pathway located within the abandoned railroad right- of-way to the west of the subject property. The pathway shall be a minimum of eight -feet (8') in width and constructed to the City of McCall's Pathway Standards. The construction plans shall include screening elements along the portion of the pathway adjacent to the residence located at 200 Thula Street. 10. Prior to the submittal of a final plat and final development plan application, the applicant shall provide a revised preliminary development plan and building elevations showing the buildings located within ten -feet (10') of the eastern property boundary and with at least one pedestrian entrance on the east side of each building. 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any lot, the applicant shall either complete the construction of a bicycle and pedestrian pathway from Thula Street to the existing bicycle and pedestrian pathway located within the abandoned railroad right-of-way to the west of MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 5 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting the subject property or enter into an escrow agreement in conformance with McCall City Code Section 3.10.10. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any lot, proof of sewer permit shall be required. 13. Prior to execution and recordation of the Subdivision Final Plat, the applicant shall construct all required street and pathway improvements and underground the overhead utility lines and shall obtain final approval of these aspects from the City of McCall. Alternatively, the applicant shall obtain approval of a Development Agreement with the City and shall provide financial assurances for any deferred improvements. 14. Pursuant to McCall City Code (MCC 9.2.06.H), preliminary subdivision plat approval shall lapse and become void whenever the applicant has not applied for final plat approval within eighteen (18) months from the date of preliminary plat approval by McCall City Council. Alternatively, the applicant shall obtain approval of a Development Agreement with the City that details a phasing plan and completion timeline. 15. Prior to execution and recordation of the Subdivision Final Plat, the applicant shall provide digital files of the plat in accordance with the McCall Digital Data Submission Standards. 16. Prior to execution and recordation of the Subdivision Final Plat, all easements shall be indicated on the final plat and shall be formally documented with signed declarations and recorded with the plat. 17. A full set of as built (record) drawings of all improvements intended for public use and maintenance, including, but not limited to, water and sewer lines, and including also private and public streets, shall be furnished to the city for the permanent records of the city within sixty (60) days of completion of the construction. The applicant, Tim Davis, addressed the Council with a brief overview of the Black Bear Condo project. Mr. Davis highlighted that four of the twenty-six units would be deed restricted for local workforce housing. An optional building permit extension has been requested in case of delays due to the sewer upgrades needed. An additional concern noted by Mr. Davis is the pathway or park and recreation requirement, instead Mr. Davis is proposing to do an "in leu of' fee. The in leu of fee is being proposed to accommodate the opposition of Mr. & Mrs. Fischer, neighbors of the property. Council had no questions for the applicant. Planner Parker gave an overview of the staff recommended conditions of approval including the pathway or parks and recreation requirement. Attorney Nichols asked Planner Parker if there is a staff recommendation in regard to Mr. Davis' request for an extension on the building permit if the sewer improvements are delayed. Planner Parker noted that it would be a reasonable request and will be included in the Development Agreement at a later meeting. Mayor Giles called for public comment in regard to the Public Hearing. Dave Petty, Park & Recreation Advisory Committee Chair, 912 Fairway Drive, commented in person. Mr. Petty's main focus was the improvement needed to city code regarding in leu fees for planned unit developments. There is not a clear direction outlined in code that is beneficial to the city or the applicant. Previous applications that have had the pathway or parks and recreation requirement has been surrounded by a lack of consensus between staff, applicants, and legal. The MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 6 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting advisory committee recommended a pathway instead of a park dedication for this particular application to avoid the accumulation of pocket parks the City does not have the funds to maintain. Mr. Petty expressed concern that the developers offer of an in-leu fee is not adequate. Eve Marostica, neighbor, 110 Thula St, commented virtually. Ms. Marostica shares the project's southern property line and is opposed to the project. The condos would be the only high -density project on that side of the Thula street. The size of the application is too large and only offers 39 parking spaces, Ms. Marostica believes no parking waiver should be granted on this application. Trailer parking for boats and snowmobiles is not in the applicant's plan and there is no room for on street parking anywhere nearby. Ms. Marostica is concerned about being cut off from her neighborhood and the layout of the waste containers on the site. An additional concern is the 4 units that will be deed restricted for local workforce housing, it is just not enough of the development. Ms. Marostica encourages Council to walk the property to take into consideration all the dynamics that are part of the application. Julie Thrower, Legal Representative for Mary and Monty Fischer of 200 Thula St, commented virtually. The Fischer's have lived in their home for 30 years as full-time residents and purchased the property in 1989. The Fischer's are opposed to the requirement of a pathway. The main concern is lack of access to their property and privacy if the pathway is constructed. Mr. Davis has been working with the Fischer's and has considered all of their concerns throughout the process. The Fischer's urge the City to work with Mr. Davis for an acceptable in leu of fee in place of the pathway. The applicant, Mr. Davis, apologized to Ms. Marostica for not having the chance to address Ms. Marostica's concerns previously. Mr. Davis noted that there was a neighborhood meeting and letters sent out to neighbors as required but Mr. & Mrs. Fischer were the only neighbors to attend. Council Member Nelsen voiced concerned about the in-leu fee amount offered by the applicant and how the pathway can be constructed in a way that would limit privacy issues for the neighbors. Council Member Nelsen additionally asked the applicant, Mr. Davis his thoughts on short-term rentals. Mr. Davis noted there is a need for housing and the deed restriction for local workforce housing will help address the issue but there will not be a restriction in place for short-term rentals in the development. Planner Park commented that the pathway does have challenges, but staff is confident that the privacy issue can be addressed with design. Council Member Maciaszek asked for clarification on the ownership of the parcel of land referred to as the strip and pathway in written comments. Planner Parker noted that the parcel is City right of way that has never been developed. Council Member Maciaszek commented that if the property is City right of way there should be no expectation of the neighbors to have that parcel of land be used for nonpublic or personal purposes. Additionally, Council Member Maciaszek noted that while the community needs more work force housing, the City needs to be careful with parking and snow storage expectations. A possibility of tenants walking around town should not factor into waiving parking expectations for a development. There needs to be more discussion at the staff level as there are still concerns that need to be addressed before moving forward. The City needs to remain consistent on how the city code is applied to developments. Council Member Nielsen asked Planner Parker if the City should require the pathway construction and clarified the length of the pathway. Planner Parker noted that the pathway would run from Thula Street to connect with the path parallel to Mission Street. Council Member Nielsen noted MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 7 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting concern that a previous development brought before Council was only required to improve area along the length of the project parcel, but this development is not being treated the same. Planner Parker clarified that this is a subdivision application and is subject to the park dedication requirement, the previous application referenced was a conditional use permit and there was no subdivision proposed with that project. Council Member Nielsen expressed frustration at the current ability to accept an in-leu fee for a park dedication but not for the dire lack of local housing and additionally asked if this project was subject to an avigation agreement. Planner Parker confirmed there is an avigation agreement for this development. Additionally, Council Member Nielsen echoed Council Member Maciaszek's concerns and wanted clarification on how the proposed in leu of fee would work. Planner Parker stated the city code in regard to in leu of fees for park dedications. Mayor Giles asked Planner Parker and Attorney Nichols how an in leu of fees could be attained and agreed upon between the City and the applicant. Attorney Nichols noted the intent of the code section is for improved park land and not land that is suitable for other types a development. Typically, the in leu of fee is to acquire property and provide simple improvements. Appraisers have their own standards, and it may be possible that an appraiser is not willing to take on the unique situation presented by this project. Attorney Nichols mentioned the City of Meridian as an example. Meridian started a fund that was funded by in leu fees to create community parks instead of pocket parks. Council Member Nielsen asked how the City puts a value on the in-leu fee without having a current project the funds would be used for. Attorney Nichols noted that interpretation of the City code would imply the value would be the future cost of acquiring a park. There has been a lack of proposals that trigger the use of the in-leu fee code. As for standards for developing a pathway, the city code does have multiple design standards in regard to parks, pathways and trees laid out. Mayor Giles appreciates staff and Attorney Nichols assistance with understanding the application, but Council is not ready to make a decision on this application. Attorney Nichols noted that Council has the ability to continue the public hearing to another meeting. Council Member Nielsen asked for staff to bring a concrete calculation on how the in-leu of fee amount came to be and for staff to review the parking waiver for feasibility with snow storage and trailer parking. Council Member Maciaszek agrees with the points made so far. There needs to be more tangible information on this application, Council needs to make sure the code is being applied consistently. Mayor Giles asked for clarification on the current requirement for parking under city code. Planner Parker noted the requirement is 1.5 parking spaces per unit plus the additional 2 trailer parking spaces for condo developments. Council Member Nielsen asked about snow storage requirements under city code. Planner Parker noted city code called for 33% of all areas to be plowed be allotted for snow storage. Council Member Nelsen asked the applicant, Mr. Davis, to consider an HOA that would limit short-term rentals. Council Member Nelsen addressed Park and Recreation Director Kurt Wolf, asking if the pathway is being built because of the development application or if the pathway will be built at some point in the future regardless of the application. Director Wolf informed the Council on how staff determined the design for the proposed pathway noting that staff has looked at an in leu of fee options but suggests a third party determine the correct in leu of amount. Director Wolf is confident that staff can come up with a privacy option for the pathway to appease the neighbors and reminds Council that the Parks and Recreation Open Space plan is currently being updated. Both the in leu of fee and the pathway are inline with the overall goals of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 8 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Council discussed continuing the meeting and asked Staff what amount of time would be needed to address Council's concerns. Attorney Nichols mentioned that new public noticing would need to be done if the public hearing is not continued to a date certain. Staff agreed that the first meeting in March would be enough time to address Council concerns. Council Member Nielson moved to continue the Public Hearing until the March 10, 2022 Regular City Council meeting. Council Member Nelsen seconded the motion. In a roll call vote, Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Nelsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, all voted aye, and the motion carried. Council took a 5 -minute break. Council Member Thrower returned to the Council. WORK SESSION 1 AB 22-029 Council Work Session #3: Recommended Ordinance for Code changes to Enforce Illegal Snow Storage and Winter Parking in City ROWs Direction to staff City Attorney Bill Punkoney gave a brief overview of the previous work session to City Council to discuss ongoing enforcement issues during winter snowplow operations resulting from: 1. Private entity snow storage within City public rights -of -way (ROW) 2. Parking of vehicles and trailers on City streets that interfere with snowplow operations. The first work session (5/28/21) presented to the Council problems with existing code language and practical challenges for efficient enforcement. Information regarding these concerns was summarized in the 5/19/21 memo by Nathan Stewart to City Council (attached). Staff recommendations for code revisions were provided with the intent to reengage the Council when more formal draft code revisions and policy recommendations could be provided. The second work session (12/2/21) presented to Council a draft code revisions and policy modifications that provided the most efficient and effective enforcement alternatives to current practice. Increasing penalties for those violating the City's ROW snow storage and parking restrictions were also discussed. Based on feedback from the previous work sessions, legal counsel has prepared a draft ordinance, presented to Council, to institute the code revisions/policy modifications. This is the second touch on this ordinance, pending any changes, a clean ordinance will be presented at a future meeting for adoption. At that time a recommended fee schedule will be presented, and a public hearing scheduled to adopt those fees. Attorney Punkoney noted that the main concerns for staff included criminalization of parking violations and snow storage in the right of way as well as a means to collect fees that are imposed outside of the court system. Nine main pieces of the Ordinance come together to obtain these goals. 1. Fine tune parking regulation to accommodate snow removal within the City of McCall 2. Sets a process for issuance of tickets and is very specific about what those parking tickets should include and how tickets are served. 3. Sets a process for administration of the parking tickets. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 9 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting 4. Allows for collection of delinquent tickets, allows the City Council to set fine from time to time by Resolution and allows for provision of administrative fees to offset the administrative costs of collecting and administrating appeals processes for tickets. 5. Prohibits parking of vehicles and trailers in ways that interfere with snow removal. 6. Prohibits the deposit of snow from private property into the public right of way. 7. Provides for snow storage violation tickets and a service process and due process for appeals and collections. Snow storage violation will mirror the set up for parking violations. 8. If a business license holder for snow removal violates the snow storage ordinance it provides for a fine and if there is a second violation within a year it provides for suspension of the license for 60 days. 9. Provides for penalty for snow removal without a commercial license. Council Member Thrower had concerns about the violation timeline and asked if the ordinance allowed for a violation that would cause a ticket to be issued daily even if they are unable to correct the issue? Attorney Punkoney asked if Council Member Thrower is in favor of having a daily violation for snow removal violations. Council Member Thrower clarified her concern is the inability to clear the snow before another violation occurs. Attorney Punkoney asked if a violation every 7 days until the snow is cleared correctly would suffice. Council Member Thrower agreed the 7 days would suffice. Council Member Nielsen asked if the snow removal contractor or the homeowner would be cited for the violation. Attorney Punkoney noted that the violation is often after the fact and a citation can be issued to either the homeowner or the snow contractor depending on circumstances. Council Member Nielsen and Council Member Thrower discussed the issue of property owners being at the mercy of the snow contractors. Council Member Nelsen asked if the violation period could be put in the Resolution with the fee schedule for a degree of flexibility. Attorney Punkoney noted adding the violation period to the Resolution can get complicated quick and it is not recommended. The City should look at what a reasonable time frame would be for responding to a violation. Council Member Nelsen stated four days would be a great starting point for a response time frame as some of these violations may be due to a safety issue. Lieutenant Palmer commented noting the city does have similar codes and having an understanding with the property owner is important. Staff understands that unique situations may require more time to address and situations that pose a safety issue need to be addressed urgently, officers can use discretion and work with the property owner. Attorney Punkoney asked if the ordinance is left the way it is, a citation could be issued every day, but it is based on staff discretion for each situation. Attorney Punkoney would be reluctant to draft staff discretion into the ordinance unless Council specifically asked for it. The appeals process can be updated to include the ability for the City Clerk to overturn a citation if the issuant can provide evidence of due diligence. Council Member Nielsen asked why staff has not offered an explanation as to why alternate side street parking is not an option. City Manager Anette Spickard noted the Public Works Director Nathan Stewart did contact Crested Bute for feedback on how the alternate parking system works for their city. Manager Spickard reviewed the feedback provided by Crested Bute and highlighted that Crested Bute is gridded and has wider right of ways than the City of McCall, not every road is treated equally, and it is not a perfect system for a growing town in snow country. Council Member Nielsen responded that the City could implement alternate parking in the downtown core MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 10 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting and Manager Spickard noted the snowplow crew is not large enough to take on the change to alternate parking. City Manager Spickard asked if Council had questions on the fee structure and gave a brief overview of the previous work session. Lieutenant Palmer noted that parking violations are currently a $25.00 City fee and additional court fees total $87, the department is seeing more compliance with parking with the increased fee amount. Lieutenant Palmer added that tow bills are usually around $150.00 - $200.00 for cars that need to be towed from the downtown core. Mayor Giles asked Lieutenant Palmer if he believes a fee of $75-$100 will get more compliance with snow issues. Lieutenant Palmer noted that higher fees do have more impact and more compliance. Council Member Nielsen commented that a fee for snow removal in the right of way should be enough to inspire snowplow contractors to return to jobs that have issues and fix the issues; As for parking, visitors may be upset over a $75.00 parking ticket. City Clerk BessieJo Wagner commented that snow removal fines will take up more staff time and needs to be greater than the parking fine to cover staff time. Attorney Punkoney noted that a fine and a fee are different. A fine is a cost for violating a City Ordinance and a fee is an additional item that can be applied to offset the administrative cost to process the fine. The Ordinance draft offers discretion on the ability to set flexible fees in relation to processing the fines. Attorney Nichols noted the fine would go into the City's General Fund and the fees could go into the department administering the process' budget. A fee will be in connection with the department incurring the cost of administering the process. Mayor Giles asked staff to come up with an administrative fee proposal for administrating the fine process. Council Member Maciaszek was unclear on the trailer parking outlined in the Ordinance draft. Attorney Punkoney noted that areas that are not specifically identified will have parking violations between 3:00am — 12:00pm with some changes on specified streets for violations between 3:00am — 7:00am. Attorney Punkoney and Manager Spickard gave a recap of the discussion. Staff will bring the requested changes and a fine/fee schedule back to Council at a future meeting. BUSINESS AGENDA 1 AB 22-19 Request to Confirm Appointment of Emily Hart as the McCall Municipal Airport Manager (ACTION ITEM) City Manager Spickard presented to Council. The city conducted a recruitment and selection process for the McCall Airport Manager in November and December. The city received 22 applications; conducted a first round of interviews with the top six applicants; identified three for in -person second interviews and invited the top two to present to the Airport Advisory Committee at their January meeting. The interview panel consisted of the City Manager, the Human Resources Manager, the Airport Engineer, and two members of the Airport Advisory Committee. At the end of the process, Emily Hart was identified as the top candidate and was offered a conditional letter of employment with a start date of January 31, 2022 contingent upon Council confirmation. Ms. Hart has many years of experience in managing airfield logistics and operations, working in snow climates, managing airbase projects, and supervising field crews. Ms. Hart is also a certified wilderness first responder, fluent in Spanish, and licensed to operate heavy equipment. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 11 of 15 Council Member Nielsen asked if the previous Airport Manager did interviews with the Council. Manager Spickard noted that the Council confirmed the previous Airport Manager in the same manner as presented tonight. Council Member Nielsen moved to confirm appointment of Emily Hart as the McCall Municipal Airport Manager starting January 31, 2022. Council Member Nelson seconded. Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Nelsen, Mayor Giles, Council Member Maciaszek, and Council Member Thrower all voted aye, and the motion carried. AB 22-023 2022 Golf Rates Recommendation and Request for Direction Golf Corse Superintendent Eric McCormick presented to Council. Each year the Golf Course Advisory Committee is tasked by Council to make a recommendation on what the golf rates should be for the upcoming season. This year the GCAC, after multiple meetings to discuss, recommends the Council raise rates 3% across all fees. As the Golf Fund is an Enterprise Fund, the Council has historically increased fees in line with the CPI to keep up with inflationary costs to maintain operations. The Council made an exception last year and increased rates beyond the CPI in order to establish the golf facilities improvement fund to start saving money for the capital projects identified in the Golf Course Assessment Management Plan. The annual CPI as of December 31, 2021 is 7% as recently reported by the federal Bureau of Labor on January 12th. The Golf maintenance budget has seen price increases associated with inflation. The cost for fuel, fertilizer, and chemicals are all up more than 7% and are a significant portion of the budget. Staff recommends Council continue their practice of adjusting rates by the CPI to keep the Golf operations budget in balance without requiring an additional transfer of money from the General Fund. Fee increases above 5% require a public hearing before they are adopted. Council discussed and came to a consensus to direct staff to move forward with a Public Hearing at the February 24, 2022 meeting to increase golf rates 7%. AB 22-025 Request to Approve the Concession Agreement for the Large Concessionaire Application: The Payette Pedal Party Boat Proposal Parks and Recreation Director Kurt Wolf and applicant Sarah Lenda presented to Council. Staff received email correspondence in June of 2021 from Sarah Lenda requesting information on the process to apply for a concession permit with the City of McCall to operate a concession within one of the waterfront parks. Staff provided the Guidelines for Comercial Activity in City Parks as outlined in Resolution NO.11-25 and discussed the time frame and process to submit a proposal for review. The applicant has since worked with the Parks & Recreation Department to address staffs questions and concerns prior to presenting the propsol to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee has had two touches on this proposal. The committee first reviewed with staff during the Committee's October meeting and provided feedback to the applicant. The applicant then presented and discussed the proposal at length with the Advisory Committee during their November 24 meeting. The Advisory Committee voted in support of the concession, pending the conditions outlined in the minutes from the November 24 committee meeting. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 12 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting The applicant and department staff presented the proposal to City Council on December 16, 2021 for comments and concerns from the Council. Both department staff and the applicant would like to continue the discussion and capture any other concerns and or revisions to the concession agreement as the Council deems necessary to achieve approval of an agreement. Staff requests that Council review, discuss, and revise the proposal and draft concession agreement as it relates to impacts to public facilities, facility use, budget, and recreational opportunities. Once it is determined that the agreement meets all of the Council's requirements, staff is requesting approval of the agreement. Council Member Thrower questioned the 3% fee asking if it is comparable to the fee other concessions pay and the level of impact to public infrastructure. Director Wolf noted that it is consistent to other current concessions. Council Member Nelsen commented appreciation for the party boat being man powered and not having a motorized impact on the lake but also noted that lake capacity and congestion is becoming a hot topic in the community. Council Member Thrower thanked the applicant for giving an overview of previous discussions and asked if there is any room in the process to see what Rick Fereday's, a member of the public opposed to this application, opposition is. The applicant, Ms. Lenda, stated that she spoke with Mr. Fereday and noted in a conversation he mentioned having an issue with concessions on city property in general. Council Member Maciaszek commented the City needs to encourage public comment and public input, especially on concessionaires' applications. Council Member Nielsen noted this is the second time this application has been on the agenda and those members of the public concerned have had ample opportunity for public comment. Mayor Giles commented that the Council is interested in listening to anyone who has criticism. Director Wolf clarified that the current concession process is outlined in Resolution 11-25 and if Council wants to update that process, staff can work on an update to bring back to Council. City Clerk BessieJo Wagner went over the current process outlined in Resolution 11-25. Council Member Maciaszek clarified that comments are not personal toward the applicant or plan but toward the current process all together. Council Member Nielsen asked about the capacity of the boat and Ms. Lenda noted the capacity of the boat is 16. Council Member Nielsen believes the parking issue is arbitrary as there is always congestion downtown, but he does not believe this business will have a great impact on the parking and it is a great opportunity for those in the community to get out and enjoy the lake who do not have regular access to a boat. It is a great low impact concession for all ages. He felt that the applicant has done a great job of jumping through all the hoops and has addressed the concerns of the Council throughout the process, it is important for the City to support local businesses and will most likely add to business in the downtown area. Council Member Thrower agrees with Council Member Maciaszek on engaging the public on Concessionaire Agreements. Council Member Nelsen believes due process has been done for this application. Attorney Nichols asked the Council to clarify what kind of notice should be included and the amount of notice Council would like on Concessionaire Agreements. Council Member Maciaszek noted it should be similar to the noticing of a Public Hearing. Council Member Nielsen noted that the applicant went through the existing process to the extent that was required. Director Wolf stressed again that the applicant did go through the process and staff worked with the applicant to formulate a one-year agreement, this is not an extended 3 — 5 -year agreement. The Parks & Recreation Master Plan update is coming up and changes to this process may happen during the update, but the applicant has completed the current process. Attorney Nichols clarified MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 13 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting that Council is looking at one of two motions, a motion to bring this application into a Public Hearing or a motion to approve the revised concession agreement. There was some discussion regarding communication to the neighbors. Council Member Nielsen moved to approve the concession agreement as modified with addition of a Staff communication plan to affected neighbors and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary document. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. Council Member Nielsen, Council Member Nelsen and Mayor Giles all voted Aye and the motion carried. Council Member Maciaszek and Council Member Thrower voted no. AB 22-027 Update on Use of Tourism Local Option Tax Revenues Received in Excess of Budgeted Expenditures City Clerk BessieJo Wagner briefed the Council. After final reconciliation of the FY21 Tourism Local Option Tax collections, distributions, and refunds there are $53,829 of LOT funds remaining. These funds are in excess of what was budgeted to be received and distributed in the FY21 budget. The use of these funds is governed by our Local Option Tax Ordinance: 4. 12. 8: CREATION OF PROPERTY TAX RELIEF FUND: Pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50- 1045, there is hereby created in the office of the City Clerk a fund to be designated as the "municipal property tax relief fund." Any revenues collected under this Chapter in excess of the amount budgeted by the City Council for the use of said revenues shall be placed by the City Clerk into the municipal property tax relief fund. Such excess revenues shall be used to replace city property taxes in the ensuing fiscal year by the amount of all excess revenues placed in said municipal property tax relief fund. Staff will therefore account for these funds as a property tax levy offset in the creation of the FY23 budget. A letter was received from the Housing Advisory Committee requesting $20,000 from the excess LOT funds for housing related projects. The City Manager has responded to let them know of the Ordinance requirements. Council had no questions or concerns. AB 22-020 City Manager 2021 Annual Performance Evaluation Discussion Human Resources Manager Traci Malvich presented to Council. This is the time of year when all City employees participate in the Annual Performance Evaluation process. As the City Manager is a direct report of the Council, the Council will complete an annual performance evaluation of the City Manager's performance during 2021. The Performance Evaluation process used by City Council has been as follows: Phase I The City Manager will complete an Employee Self Feedback assessment and submit it to Human Resources. Human Resources (HR) will forward the self -assessment to City Council for use during the evaluation. Phase II Each of the City Manager's direct reports will complete a supervisor evaluation form where they have an opportunity to evaluate their manager in an anonymous manner. The Supervisor Evaluation forms will be submitted to HR who will compile all feedback into one document that will be sent to all Council members. Phase III MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 14 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Council will use the prior year evaluation, position description, self -feedback, and supervisor evaluation forms to complete the Annual Performance Evaluation. Each Council member will have the opportunity to submit feedback and establish goals for the upcoming year. Phase IV Council will work with the HR Manager to summarize and formalize performance review documents to be presented to the City Manager in a future meeting as the Annual Performance Evaluation for 2021. Staff asked for direction from Council to begin the evaluation process for the City Manager. Decide which members of Council will be responsible for collecting comments from Council and completing the performance evaluation documents. Then an executive session to deliver 2021 performance evaluation to the City Manager will be scheduled for a future meeting. Council Member Nelson will be the scribe. Upcoming Meeting Schedule Discussion Council decided to move the executive session schedule for tonight's meeting to the February 3, 2022 meeting. ADJOURNMENT 1 Without further business, Mayor Giles adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m. ATTEST: Bes ieJo Wa er, City 1J� or MCC,-- ,4•� S� ,....., 1,--,, S4, a i l / ' . % %•il i . Robert S. Giles, Mayor O ID AllPo ``�� MCCALL CITY COUNCIL Page 15 of 15 January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting ATTACHMENT A 1 1/14/22 12:34:44 Ann Meredith PO box 334 Donnelly IDAHO 83615 "Please see the enclosed link to a program that is being used in Vail, Colorado. This InDeed program would be a good solution to the lack of housing for working people in McCall. The extra money from the lot tax would be a good way to fund this program. Thanks, Ann Meredith Info: Vail, Colorado: The Vail InDEED Program Provides Deed -Restricted Workforce Housing in a Resort Market 1 HUD USER Link: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-081121.html " MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: To: Subject: Date: I beckeo i kosdesi o n. com Bessie)o Wagner Re -address Language Prohibiting Gas Stations in the Scenic Route Friday, January 21, 2022 1:52:56 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BessieJo, I'm writing support the cause to urge City Council to re -address the code language to prohibit gas stations in the Scenic Route. This singular item was pulled from the code adoption text last-minute by Colby. At the time it was not further discussed to avoid delaying the rest of the adoption timeline. Obviously this has timely impacts. This issue is has strong public momentum. Ms. Lisa Beck Partner, LEED AP BD+C EPIKOS LAND PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE 303 Colorado Street, PO Box 2490 McCall, Idaho 83638 p 208.634.4540 ext. 702 www.epikosdesign.com MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: Jennifer Hurlbutt To: BessieJo Wanner Cc: Matt HurIbut Subject: Re -address Language Prohibiting Gas Stations on the Scenic Route Date: Friday, January 21, 2022 3:58:58 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BessieJo- I'm writing to urge the City Council to re -address the code language to prohibit gas stations on the Scenic Route. This item was pulled from the code adoption text at a prior meeting. At the time, it was not discussed anymore to avoid delaying the rest of the adoption timeline. Please consider this request to re -address language prohibiting gas stations on the scenic route. This is, personally, a huge issue for us. I also know this issue is building and has strong public momentum. Thanks BessieJo! Matt & Jennifer Hurlbutt Owners/Salmon River Brewery MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: To: Subject: Date: Steve Jones BessieJo Wanner Maverick project. Friday, January 21, 2022 5:22:25 PM CALF -ION. This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Bessie Jo I'm writing to support the cause to urge City Council to re -address the code language to prohibit gas stations in the Scenic Route. This singular item was pulled from the code adoption text last-minute by Councilman Nielsen. At that time, I understand it was not further discussed to avoid delaying the rest of the adoption timeline. Obviously this was a oversight and I think the City Council must address this again We have so many gas stations already in the downtown area, starting with the Sinclair, Shell, the current Maverick and Chevron. Ketchum Idaho has half that number! On the most busy weekend in the summer, at the most I wait for one car at any of those stations before I get to an open pump. At the current Maverick you can always get a pump without waiting, so why do we need any more.? I believe we do not and I urge the City Council to say no to Maverick moving to the land on the corner of Colorado and HWY 55. Thank you STEVE JONES PARTNER 1 REALTOR® sjones@2ndhomes.com Cell 208-634-6497 www.2ndhomes.com Amherst Madison Real Estate Advisors MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: To: Subject: Date: doeughCa eoikosdesign.com BessieJo Wagner Gas stations in the Scenic Route Friday, January 21, 2022 3:08:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Bessie Jo, I writing about the misguided decision to allow gas stations in the Scenic Route. I was extremely disappointed to learn that it was due to a last minute action by Councilman Colby Nielsen and allowed to remain. I understand that there is a movement to urge City Council to revisit the code language prohibiting gas stations in the Scenic Route. Unfortunately, we have a Maverik gas station trying to do exactly what we do not want and that is to develop a Super C -Store on the corner of Colorado St and Highway 55. While it may be too late for this particular application, we must not allow more gas stations in our downtown area, therefore, I am full support in urging City Council to revisit this code language and disallow gas stations in the Scenic Route altogether. Thank you for your consideration, David J. Peugh, Principal EPIKOS Planning + Architecture 303 Colorado Street Box 2490 McCall, Idaho 83638 208-634-4540 ext 701 www.EpikosDesign.com MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: Joey Pietri To: BessieJo Wagner Subject: Moratorium Proposal Date: Saturday, January 22, 2022 10:20:18 AM This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BessieJo, I'd like to request getting the Moratorium Proposal on the City Council Meeting Agenda . To me it is so important to get public input on this and learn the direction the City and County plan to go with what I see as uncontrolled growth. This would be a good time to take a pause and examine how we can improve things for everyone and the environment, not just yield to the pressures of developers and corporations to keep pressing on . The needs are many and local government should be for all people to have a say and be heard . Thank you for your consideration and I hope my request is passed along to the Council . Best regards , Joey Pietri 225 Valley Springs Rd. McCall MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: katie hudson To: BessieJo Wagner Date: Friday, January 21, 2022 5:48:07 PM CAUTION This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BessieJo, I'm writing support the cause to urge City Council to re -address the code language to prohibit gas stations in the Scenic Route. This singular item was pulled from the code adoption text last-minute by Councilman Nielsen. At the time, it was not further discussed to avoid delaying the rest of the adoption timeline. Obviously this has timely impacts. This issue is has strong public momentum. Sincerely, Katie and Reese Hudson 423 Colorado st MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: To: Subject: Date: wruemmele(@eoikosdesign.com BessieJo Wagner Prohibiting new gas stations in Scenic Route zone Friday, January 21, 2022 3:17:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear BessieJo, Please forward this to council members. We understand that a request has been made to re -visit code language to prohibit new gas stations in the Scenic Route. We followed this item through the last code re -write all the way to the Council meeting. Councilman Nielsen struck this individual item at the final review despite having support from the public, staff, and the code consultant. As I recall, a comment was made about supporting small family -run gas stations. I hate to say it, but new gas stations are not local businesses anymore. The proposed super-Maverik is the industry model. Removing this prohibition goes against many decades of public comment and city comprehensive plans which have been striving for a vibrant downtown without vehicle congestion and large truck traffic. While this code language will not be in place to block the Maverik application, it can stop future ones. I think we all want downtown McCall to be the best it can be. Thank you for your consideration, Wayne Wayne Ruemmele Partner, Architect, LEED AP www.epikosdesign,com EPIKOS LLC, Planning + Architecture 303 Colorado Street, PO Box 2490, McCall ID 83638 ph: 208.634.4540 x 700 DISCLAIMER: All drawings, notes and/or data contained in this email or attached computer file(s) prepared by Epikos LLC, as instruments of service are the property of Epikos LLC, which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory, or copyrights. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use, or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Epikos LLC. MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting From: Alisa Cisar To: BessieJo Wagner Subject: Maverick oversight Date: Sunday, January 23, 2022 9:35:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi BessieJo, I am writing in response to an issue that was brought to my attention regarding the code language to prohibit gas stations on the scenic route. This item was pulled from the code adoption, and I believe this was a mistake and should be readdressed by City Council. I live on Colorado street and have a 2 year old son who plays outside, along with a handful of other children who play freely in the neighborhood. The impact that traffic will have to our quiet Colorado st if a Super C Maverick store is built on the comer will be detrimental to the safety of our children. Not to mention to our neighborhood in general and the infrastructure of our street and the sharp 90 degree corner where first st and Colorado st meet. I'm not against a Maverick expanding their stores. I think it would be more appropriate outside of town. I hope city council will see the error in this and take this into serious consideration. Thank you Alisa Ockunzzi Sent from my iPhone MCCALL CITY COUNCIL January 27, 2022 Regular Meeting Statement for Jan 27th, 2022, Council meeting I thank the city staff for negotiating through the difficult time Covid has presented us. But I feel people in our community have been left out of many discussions and decisions. Some people in our community do not have access to the internet. The zoom technology challenges some, and some do not have connection speeds to watch or participate in council meetings. And Some are fearful of large gatherings. I think any approval process, unless it is an emergency, should be put on hold until we get back to normal, allowing more people in our community to participate in decisions that impact them. I submitted a complaint a few weeks ago and did not receive a response. I was concerned that city staff and our fire chief expressed their concerns about STR /LTR in a meeting I watched. Long-term rentals operate like small motels but do not meet the fire safety standards of small hotels, putting visitors and residents in danger. Why can't the city council authorize the Fire Chief to inspect LTR immediately if the city has acknowledged a threat to the safety and welfare of people in our community and visitors that rent vacation homes? And why is the public excluded from meetings commenting on this critical safety issue? The Star -News published my Building Moratorium proposal for Valley County, which I have sent to all of you and county commissioners. I realized the city is discussing housing issues, but as I pointed out in my 6 -page proposal, many other problems we face as a community are connected and should be discussed. I want to request that the council place a moratorium discussion on their agenda. Valley County's decisions significantly impact McCall. We also need to discuss a moratorium for McCall to revisit zoning regulations. The purpose of zoning is to ensure balanced communities. Many people in our community do not feel our community is balanced. I also think the Brundage Mountain 1200 home proposal for Adams County needs to be discussed. There are many unanswered questions about who would pay for EMS for the BMR complex and other impacts from BMR's proposed plan on our community. Our Deputy Fire Chief Travis Smith has commented that EMS calls are not adequate for McCall, and wait times for EMS are increasing, which is a health and safety issue for McCall residents and visitors. I started a petition for a moratorium receiving over a hundred signatures in 3 days, so I think the community would welcome a moratorium discussion to solve the issues we face as a community. Thank you, David Gallipoli McCall, ID