HomeMy Public PortalAbout20131024 PW&P packetNotice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda
City of Jefferson Public Works & Planning Committee
Thursday, October 24, 2013
1) Introductions
7:30a.m.
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street
Boone/Bancroft Room (Upper Level)
TENTATIVE AGENDA
2) Approval of the September 19, 2013 Committee meeting minutes
3) Old Business
1. Revision to Forestry Article in the City Code (Bill Lockwood)
4) New Business
1. Change Order with Bartlett & West, Inc. for Basin 5 & 6 Relief Sewer-Phase II Design Services
(Eric Seaman)
2. Dunklin Street Crosswalk (David Bange)
3. Helias Catholic High School Signage Request (Amendment of Chapter 3, Advertising and Signs)
(Janice McMillan)
4. Approval of CDBG Consolidated Plan Submittal to the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (Janice McMillan)
5. Heisinger Road Street Lights (Britt Smith)
6. Ongoing Subdivision Acceptance (Matt Morasch)
7. 2014 Miscellaneous Storm Water Projects (Don Fontana)
5) Other Topics
1. Planning & Protective Services Monthly Reports
6) Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues
7) Adjourn
NOTES
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regardmg agenda items.
MINUTES
JEFFERSON CITY
PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING COMMITTEE
Boone/Bancroft Room
Committee Members Present:
Bob Scrivner, Chairman
*Carrie Carroll, Vice-Chair
Jim Branch
Shawn Schulte
*arrived late
Committee Members Absent
Ralph Bray
Staff Present:
John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Street
September 19, 2013
Matt Morasch, PE, Interim Director of Public Works
Britt Smith, PE, Operations Division Director
David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor
Eric Seaman, Wastewater Division Director
Don Fontana, Storm water Engineer
Janice McMillan, Director of Planning and Protective Services
Eric Barron, Senior Planner
Jayme Abbott,
JJ Gates, Parks, Recreation and Forestry
Jeremy Cover, Associate City Counselor
Drew Hilpert, City Counselor
Brenda Wunderlich, Administrative Assistant
Attendance
6 of6
6 of6
6 of6
4 of6
5 of6
Chairman Scrivner called the meeting to order at 7:30a.m. A quorum was present at this time.
The following guests were present: Councilman Carlos Graham; Pam Cafourek,Beeline/Bemboom
Enterprises; Mike Michelson; Representing the Frog Hollow Neighborhood: Steve Enloe Ron
Gresham, Dennis Forck, Maria Campbell, and Rhonda Bonnot; Representing Citizens for JeffTran:
Wayne Lee; Ashley Varner, Vicki Schildmeyer, Paul VanHorn; and Madeleine Leroux, News Tribune.
1) Introductions
Those present introduced themselves.
2) Approval of the August 22, 2013 Committee meeting minutes
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilman Branch seconded to approve the August 22,
2013 minutes, motion carried. Councilwoman Carroll was absent for this vote.
4 Consent Items
1. Vacation of Sanitary Sewer Easement in the 2600 block of East McCarty (David Bange)
Mr. Bange explained staff is requesting the vacation due to the sewer easement not being
located over the existing sewer main. Through a new easement which has already been granted and
the vacation of this easement the erroneous description will be corrected and will allow for new
construction to take place on this lot.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee 2
September 19, 2013
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilman Branch seconded to refer the vacation of the
sanitary sewer easement to the City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried.
Councilwoman Carroll was absent for this vote.
5 Old Business
1. Revision to Forestry Article in the City Code (Bill Lockwood/Drew Hilpert)-Request to
table until the October Committee Meeting
Chairman Scrivner explained Mr. Lockwood has requested this item be tabled as he is
unavailable to attend the meeting.
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilman Branch seconded to table this item to the
October Committee meeting, motion carried. Councilwoman Carroll was absent for this vote.
2. Fluoride Code Changes (Drew Hilpert)
Mr. Hilpert explained the code changes done reflect the recommendations of the United States
Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
Councilman Branch moved and Councilman Schulte seconded to refer the code change to the
City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried. Councilwoman Carroll was absent for
this vote.
3. Frog Hollow Road Project Update: (Matt Morasch)
b. Change in Scope
Mr. Morasch explained staff has come up with an alternate plan for the area and plan to obtain
services for a traffic engineer to study the Edgewood corridor to come up with a final traffic control for
that corridor.
*Councilwoman Carroll arrived at this time (7:40 a.m.).
-Mr. Bange explained the alternate plan is to tie into Creek Trail rather than Frog Hollow,
making a portion of Frog Hollow a dead end street.
There was discussion among Committee members, staff and those present regarding the
changes.
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilwoman Carroll seconded to proceed with the alternate
development plan, as proposed, for the Frog Hollow area, motion carried.
a. Jefferson City School District Development Agreement
Mr. Hilpert explained the agreement with the school will dedicate right of way to the City.
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding the greenway trail
issue. Committee members suggested moving forward with the agreement as proposed.
4. Update of CDBG Policy and Procedures Manual (Janice McMillan)
Ms. McMillan explained the proposed update now includes the reference to the CDBG
program and authorizes the Department Director to promulgate the CDBG policies and procedures.
There will be annual changes. An annual plan must be submitted to HUD.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
September 19.2013
3
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilman Branch seconded to refer the CDBG Policies and
Procedures to the City Council with the change that it is adopted by resolution on an annual basis,
motion carried.
6 New Business
1. Historic Preservation Indoor Photographs on Demolitions (Jayme Abbott)
Ms. McMillan explained the proposed code change would require demolition permits for
buildings fifty years old or older must include interior photographs and a statement from the property
owner as to why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with a reasonable economic return to
the owner.
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding why the photographs
are needed. Ms. McMillan explained the Historic Preservation Commission wants to know the history
and condition of the property prior to demolition.
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilwoman Carroll seconded to amend the proposed
ordinance changes to strike out the underlined portion in Section B.2. pertaining to documentation.
The amendment passes unanimously.
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilman Branch seconded to refer the ordinance change,
as amended, to the City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried.
2. Electrical Service Easement on New Fire Station No. 3 (David Bange)
Mr. Bange explained the request would allow Missouri American to gain access to an electrical
transformer which was set to serve the new Fire Station #3.
Councilman Branch moved and Councilwoman Carroll seconded to refer the request to the
City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried.
3. Update on Jefferson/Stadium/Hwy 54 Interchange (David Bange)
Mr. Bange explained the improvements to the area surrounding the intersection of Jefferson
and Stadium.
4. Contract Amendment with Holts Summit for Sewage Treatment (Eric Seaman)
Mr. Seaman explained staff has negotiated a mutually beneficial amendment with Holts
Summit
Councilman Branch moved and Councilwoman Carroll seconded to refer the contract
amendment to the City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried.
5. Construction Contract for Algoa Disinfection Project (Eric Seaman)
Mr. Seaman explained bids will be received on October 1 for installation of a disinfection
system at the Algoa Regional Treatment Facility. This is in response to a Missouri DNR change in
water quality regulations and new bacteria limits placed in our operating permit.
Councilwoman Carroll moved and Councilman Branch seconded to refer the contract to the
City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried. ~
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
September 19, 2013
6. St. Martins Sewer Agreement (Drew Hilpert)
Mr. Hilpert explained the 25 year old agreement with St. Martins is about to expire and staff
will be negotiating new rates. ·
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding the rate for St. Martins,
annexation, and the current agreement.
Councilman Branch moved and Councilwoman Carroll moved to refer the resolution negotiate
new rates with St. Martins to the City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried.
7. Demolition Bids for 600 block and 711 Mulberry Street (Janice McMillan)
4
Ms. McMillan explained the bid opening will be on September 25. Funding will be done with
Community Development Block Grant funds. The contract will be sent to the City Council for approval.
8. CAMPO Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Amendment (Janice McMillan)
Ms. McMillan explained the amendment includes $24,000 in professional services to fund a
consultant to do a way finding plan and to develop aesthetic recommendations for the Lafayette
Interchange Project.
7 Other Topics
1. Planning & Protective Services Monthly Reports
Ms. McMillan referred Committee members to the reports included in the packet.
2. CIP Workflow (Matt Morasch)
Mr. Morasch explained the potential slowing pace of the implementation of capital
improvement sales tax projects and other planning studies. In addition, there will likely be an increase
in use of consultants to perform the designs of improvements once conducted by City staff. These
changes are a result of several vacancies in the Engineering Division.
8 Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues
There was no one present to speak on this item.
9 Adjourn
Councilman Schulte moved and Councilman Branch seconded to adjourn the meeting at this
time (9:14a.m.), motion carried.
ARTICLE II. FORESTRY COMMISSION
Sec. 23-11. Establishment and Designation of a City Forestry Commission.
There is hereby established a City Forestry Commission ihereinafter "Forestry Commission").
The Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, in addition to other duties
and responsibilities, is hereby designated as the Forestry Commission for the City of Jefferson, Missouri.
Sec. 23-12. Functions Generally.
A, Tl:!e ~erestrv <:eFAFAissieR sl:!alll:!ave resf!BRsililili~ fer if'R!lleFAeRtatieR eftl:!e ~leR Parl1 Tree
PlaRtiRg PlaR 1 aJilf!FeveEI lil•t tl:!e {;ewReil as f!Fevieleel iR §eetieR 7 17 ef tl:!e <:eele ef tl:!e Cit'{ ef
JefferseR, iR aeeerelaRee witl:! reeegRileEI l:!ertieultwral, arli!erin1ltural a Rei ferestry staRelarEis a Rei witl:!iR
ewsgetary eeRstraiRts.
S.& The Non-Park Tree Planting Plan approved by the Council and the Park Tree Plan
approved by the Forestry Commission shall together constitute the Comprehensive Tree Plan for the
s_;:,;ity. Such plans will be incorporated ,in the annual capital and operating budgets requests for streets,
parking lots, public grounds and the park system presented to the Council for approval.
(; . .!!: Subject to other provisions of this article and the Code of the City of Jefferson, the Forestry
Commission -shall undertake any action, or program, and may formulate, adopt. and enforce rules
and regulations it finds advisable or necessary for the care, preservation, pruning, planting, removal
and replanting of trees and shrubs and other landscaping;.C~:; __ ~cc.:J.:,.•':i··;''' ,; establish standards for
distances, clearances and species in parks, along street rights-of-way, and in public parking lots~within
the Downtown Beautification District.
Sec. 23-13. Definitions.
City forester. The employee of the Parks and Recreation Commission so designated -by the
director to administer the city's forestry program.
f?..Q.~!lL\bY..D...f~~1!:Hlfif:~Hl2D .. D.!.?!l~~sJ.: ..... IJ:!~(:~ ... ~:!.~:i~.~:~ ... Qf . .L!:!!:~. -~-_i -~·.Y ... ~~-~: .. !.~l.~L!.~~lLL€:.~J.t2Y .. !:!.~g __ /Q~.:.u ..... L~::.fJ~x~gJ.~~---~~;_uy
.~.f:~_gU:li£~tl!.9.!LP.le!1 ... ?..£.~:t!.9.D¥Z.:._.I!}.st~~X~0:t!.~~-J.U.~~---r_.~~-~-j_!..U.~~-s .. :.~:J . ..t~.::: .Lt!.SU~:L>~:::;~ ~-j ;_L_f.j~b~.~--;::.~ ! .. ~-.!.:...'4. .. E:~J.l.! ... .J:illil!.i"!J!..Y ..
PJi2:~tQ.tLttl~ \:Y.\veS:~.t.l! .. ~!D.~Jj_n5J.~~-!~?.~ .. .9.rl .. ~.~~-{L~?.?.9.t,~.t:~:; ... ::~. :: ~) .. ! .. J{(_~ 1.~:~.L: <~ ~~ t:::5·-.~ \ ~ .. ·)~" \.!'~ \~ i: :.i ~:·. t ·-~ :~ .. JiL.; =)f\ ti cE;·l_~ .t ~~-lh
s;des of Dunklin Str·eet and lafayQt!~ . .?.tr<::.t:t,.
Park Tree Plan. The plan adopted by the Parks and Recreation Commission, as a part of its
duties to study, investigate, develop, update and administer plans for the care, preservation, pruning,
planting, replanting, removal or the disposition of trees and shrubs in parks, greenways and public
grounds maintained by the Parks and Recreation Commission in accordance
with recognized horticultural, arboricultural and forestry standards.
Park trees. Trees, shrubs, bushes, and all other woody vegetation in public parks, grounds
and greenways owned, controlled or maintained f9E.J2;1.fl:.ilt.lf.fl.<l)";:[!by the Parks
and Recreation Commission of the ;;;;;ity.
Private communitv trees. All other trees within municipal boundaries not included in the
definition of -park trees, ~street trees, or public parking lot trees.
9!3£ 2:'!itreet trees and public parking lot trees. Trees, shrubs, bushes, and all other woody
vegetation located on land within the right-of-way of all streets, avenues, and public parking lots within
the Downtown Beautification District ~+tv which were planted by the ~~?ity as part of a public project
and which are confined within sidewalk tree wells/pits and tree lawns .. with the exception of those
trees and shrubs planted and maintained by the State of Missouri on or abutting state grounds and
facilities or by agreement with the City.
I2.PJ2i.ng. Topping, rounding-off, or pollarding means a systematic cutting back of limbs within
the tree's crown to such a degree as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the tree.
Tree lawn. That part of a street or highway7 right-of-way not covered by sidewalk or other
paving, lying between the property line and that portion of the street or highway usually used for
vehicular traffic and includes unpaved islands and medians between surfaces usually used for
vehicular traffic.
Sec. 23-14. Designation of Director of Forestry.
A. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Commission shall also serve as Director of the
Forestry Commission and is charged with responsibility for carrying out the policy directives of the
Forestry Commission. The Director of the Forestry Commission shall hire such qualified forestry staff as
necessary and delegate to them such duties as deemed appropriate and shall designate a "city forester"
within the organizational structure of the Department of Parks and Recreation.
Sec. 23-15. Duties of City Forester.
A. Under the supervision of the Director of the Forestry Commission, it shall be the duty of
the city forester to see that all statutes and ordinances for the planting and protection of trees within
the Downtown Beautification District are strictly enforced; to direct the time and method of
planting and maintaining citv street trees within the Downtown Beautification District all trees iA tl=le
streets aREI f31llalie jalaees ef tl=le eit>,•. to consult with the Council, the Environmental Quality Commission,
other city departments, the Forestry Commission and property owners regarding the kind of trees
and method of planting deemed desirable on particular streets within the Downtown Beautification
District: to report to the l=erestF'r' CeR'lR'lissieR 9!3£ whenever trees have died or need attention,
iA ereler tl=lat tl:le l=erestry CeR'lR'lissieA R'lay eare fer SilER trees er ea11se tl:le salile te lae re,alaeeel,
and to perform such other duties relating to his office as may be prescribed from time to time by the
Director of the Forestry Commission.
B. All planting, cutting, trimming, and pruning of trees within the Downtown
Beautification District shall be under the supervision of the city forester. It shall be unlawful to plant,
cut, trim, top, prune, or otherwise disturb any tree or shrub in street rights-of-way or public property of
the \;,~ty7 within the Downtown Beautification District. or cause such acts to be done by others,
without first obtaining a written permit from the city forester. The city forester shall have authority to
issue and deny permits for the planting, care and removal of trees as provided for in this ordinance. The
city forester shall issue the permit if the desired work is necessary and the proposed method and
workmanship are of a satisfactory -nature.; provided that a permit will not be required for the
trimming or maintaining of shrubbery growing on any streets rights-of-way for the purpose of
maintaining proper clearance. The Forestry Commission may establish fees for such permits as may be
reasonable to recover the cost of issuance and inspection and may require compensatory payments for
the removal and replacement of trees.
C. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the city forester to deny a permit may appeal
to the Director of the Forestry Commission whose decisions may be appealed to the Forestry
Commission which shall have final authority.
Sec. 23-16. Funding and OperatieA& Responsibility.
A,. The Parks and Recreation Commission has the responsibility to fund the care of
park trees as a part of its normal park system maintenance and operations duties .. _,,,._:·."·'·'·''·'·'--""'"'-·'•"'·J"-"'·'·~'
~.r.sf.~,~:;;.he Forestry Commission, utilizing t':i\?..'o?.'DPi?Y'~S3.~: ''E'.).t:..t:;\i\pn_,,._,:Ls;f_t,t'' 'r•arks
and Erecreation i~Qill!:D.!.?..?.iD.fl·£'rBfil£.ye€•;-aPciE><pJi!<mE·iV:, will also be responsible for the care
and maintenance of s:Gity street trees and public parking lot trees located in sidewalk tree wells/pits
and tree lawns within the Downtown Beautification District.t.UJ.t.9D!Y.J.O th!U0.tr:nt aJl!d.~Y.§:d uti!.t~.\ng
specific funds aii<Xated ~ a4ciitlon; i f••mfu:lg---;.;s . .;r?f*Me4 by the Council. Requests for such
funding -shall be clearly distinguished from tRe gny general fund operating subsidy for tL•Lf.parks
and firecreation £Q!llr.D.L~~l.PD. .. and shall be accounted for in such way as to accurately propose the cost
of &ili( street tree and public parking lot tree care.
Absent a SPi!cifir. al!g:.~.U9i.! .. l?..Y.tb:;..qt:/L general fundc9LP.i! .. L~iDK.fu.f.l.0.. the Parks and
Recreation Commission shall have no responsibility for trees ttc£!O"r<:: .. !.}Qt.,Q..<;f)r'.'iQ.<~.~.P.i!f.i.\.!.r.sgz,
fL.--. . .. Outside gf.. the Downtown Beautificaton District the Department of Public Works and *
Department of Planning and Protective Services shall be responsible for tree planting, maintenance,
removal. regulation. and code enforcement in street rights-of-way in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 21 of the City Code, but may consult with the cGity fJ:;orester to implement sound urban
forestry practices.
C. The cost of repair or replacement of any (:§ity street tree 9.Ll?.f.'Y.!.'.i;g_:~.(!.•.r••.J.J.!:!ill!Y .. !.r:&Q
1.9 .. 9Lt~ in rights-of--way within the Downtown Beautification District damaged or removed as a result
of any work or improvement undertaken by the adjacent property owner shall be the responsibility of
the property owner. Any ~Mfh. tree removed in the Downtown Beautification District shall be replaced
in accord with the Non-Park Tree Planting Plan as provided by this Section and Section 7-17 of the
Code of the Citv of Jefferson. Adjacent property owners may elect to maintain ~-~;ity street trees at
their own expense upon agreement with the ~~J!y_i_iorester.
D. Any private community tree located between the property line and the curb shall be
the responsibility of the adlacent property owner to maintain in the same manner as trees located on
private property as defined in this ~~ction.
Sec. 23-17. Removal of Dead, Dangerous, Damaged, or Diseased Trees.
The Forestry Commission shall have the right to cause the pruning, maintenance, and/or
removal of trees, plants and shrubs on public or private property within the Downtown Beautification
District of the £eity when such trees, plants or shrubs constitute a hazard to life and property, or harbor
insects or disease which constitute a potential threat to other trees within the C•;ity. The city forester
shall have the authority to follow the abatement procedures under the nuisance section of the code.
Sec. 23-18. Public Education and Training.
The Forestry Commission may from time to time offer consultation, training, and education
programs to ··homeowners, businesses, utilities, other public agencies, and tree service companies
regarding proper selection, planting, care, pruning, and removal of trees and shrubs to protect
and enhance the value of the urban forest in Jefferson City.
Sec. 23-19. Interference with the Forestry Commission.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to prevent, delay, or interfere with the Forestry
Commission or any of its agents while engaging in and about the planting, cultivating, mulching, pruning,
spraying, or removing ··Of any park tree, city grounds tree, street tree, public parking lot tree, or trees
on private grounds, as authorized in this ordinance.
B. It shall be unlawful for any person to prevent, delay, or interfere with access to private
property by the Forestry Commission or its representative in the legal performance of any section of this
ordinance.
Sec. 23-20. Penaltv.
Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be subject to, in addition to any other
penalties, the penalty as provided for the abatement of a nuisance. In addition, if as a result of the
violation of any provision -of this ordinance, the injury, mutilation, or death of any park tree, city
grounds tree, street tree or public parking lot tree is caused, the cost of repair or replacement of such
tree or shrub shall be borne by the party in violation. The replacement value of trees and shrubs shall be
determined in accordance with accepted arboricultural standards.
Cross References-Oty Charter; Article VI; Chapter l., General Provisions, sec. 1-13;
Chapter 21, Nuisances, sec. 21-36, 21-43.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WASTEWATER DIVISION
320 EAST McCARTY STREET
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
Change Order No. One (1) Project No. 31114 Date: November 18, 2013
Job & Location: BASIN 5 & 6 RELIEF SEWER-PHASE II DESIGN SERVICES
Contractor: Bartlett & West, Inc.
It is hereby mutually agreed that when this change order has been signed by the contracting parties, the following described
changes in the work required by the contract shall be executed by the contractor without changing the terms of the contract
except as herein stipulated and agreed.
Description of Changes: This change order provides for additional design services to perform all tasks necessary to evaluate,
design, and draft plans and specifications associated with the relocation and upgrade of sewers required to accommodate the
Highway 50 -Lafayette Interchange and eliminate constructed sanitary sewer overflows and basement backups.
Note: Items numbers prefixed with "EW" (Extra Work) are new line items to the contract.
Item No. Description Quantity in
I
Quantity in J Revised Contract Unit Price
Contract Change Order Quantity
EW-1 Phase II Design Services 0 I 1 I 1 $212.671.00
CONSULTANTS PROPOSAL FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED CHANGES:
IM/e hereby agree to the modifications of the contract as described above and agree to furnish all materials and labor and
perform all work in connection therewith in accordance with the requirements for similar work in existing contract except as
otherwise stipulated herein, for the following considerations:
Contract Amount-Add to the Contract Amount $212.671.00 (two hundred, twelve thousand, six hundred and seventy one
dollars) Time and Material Not-to Exceed
Contract Time -There is no change to the Contract Time
STATEMENT OF CONTRACT AMOUNT: __
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
PREVIOUS APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER
TOTAL OF ALL CHANGE ORDERS
CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE
Bartlett & West, Inc.
Consultant
Recommended By:
Public Works Director
Verification of Encumbrance:
Finance Director
Amount
$440,000.00
$0
$212,671.00
$212,671.00
$652,671.00
%Change
48.3%
48.3%
48.3%
Date
Date
Date
Time
0
0
0
0
0
Accepted By:
(Owner) City Administrator Date
Approved as to Form:
City Counselor Date
Memorandum
320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www.jeffcitymo.org
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
October 21, 2013
Public Works and Planning Committee
David Bange P.E., Engineering Supervisor p?D
Dunklin Street Crosswalk
The State of Missouri has requested, and has agreed to fund, the construction of a signed crosswalk in
the 400 block of E. Dunklin Street immediately in front of the Employment Security building. This is a
project that was designed at their request by City staff several years ago, but at that time was shelved
for lack of funding.
\
I have enclosed a drawing sheet showing the planned improvements which include the addition of
bump outs much like the ones found on High Street in the downtown area, in addition to actuated
flashing lights, signage, and crosswalk striping. Power for the lights will be drawn from the employment
security building.
Once a funding agreement can be reached with the State of Missouri this project could be constructed
in relatively short order. ·
If you need additional information please contact me.
DB:db
U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PI.ANNING\2013\1 0-24-2013\Dunklin Street Sidewalk.docx
---~---~---~---"---~---~ Mn~C.,.MO.,IOI I :·) I 1 tl' ___ ,. ___ ,. ___ ,. ___ ,. ___ ,. ___ .,. _j -.I I ( _), ~r~"-...::."! __ ,. ___ , ___ ,
' L'--_}-I I
li I I I ~ I I ~ ~~ I l i
s I f I I I I I I
/'1 I l l __ j I I
I I
___ _j ___ l
------I
------'--
0 •75
Dunklin Street
I
I
I I I I
= = = _!. = = -=l= = =1-=-= = 4--= = = _____ _, ______ _t __ _
( ' I I
\ --·-: 1-5·-
.• l I
,1_1 ·I I
I I
'---I I
---1'\ _ _..'C._ .......... "'"':::!:--,---"'---•I\. ___ ,... 0_
1
I
I :*o!:.:o. .. -u.-ot~Scany I
JtfftnanCIIIy ).106JIOI I
londfru) V..O.:I match
ba .. ot o.lftstnq
otelhalt OJJb
I
-1 I I_-:-.:~_-:-~-"-~-~--_-_ .... -"J __ ,.. ---1\. ___ ,_ ___ ..., ---1":
1 I : John .,s Sh.my Bot.xt
•'2:2£ DYr.l.la:nSo«t
JcfrfUCIJICIC')',M06JIOI I ~
I !
I " I ·~
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,-
.. -----"
1--Ll:----t----1:1£1------l-----1 ...
0+50.00 10 XI JO •O ~ 10 .)00
z
0 t
Qi. u
tfJ
0
0 z
<(
z
Q
VI
~
""'
0 z
Central Missouri Professional Services
2500 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
573-634-3455 573-634-8898 (fax)
City of Jefferson
Janice McMillian
Director of Planning and Protective Services
320 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Dear Mrs. Mctvfillian,
October 21, 2013
RE: Electronic Message Center
Helias Catholic High School
CMPS Job No. 95-087
Helias Catholic High School respectfully requests the City of Jefferson review the current
code for Advertising and Signs, Chapter 3, for the potential of allowing an Electronic Message
Center for their facility located on Swifts Highway. It is our understanding the current code
prohibits permitting of Electronic Message Centers for their zoning classification. The proposed
signage would be monument type and would be located west of the west entrance to the High
School.
On behalf of the He lias Catholic High School we would like to thank you for your
assistance in bringing this issue to the Public Works and Planning Committees attention.
Sincerely,
Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc.
~J.' a..~~
Robert M. (Mike) Bates, P.E.
Cc; Ed Twehous
1 of 1
~ u
z 0
0 _J ~ co
V) 1-<(
et: et: w >-z (!) u... 1-w 0 u... -~ w z et: --, ::::> a.. a.. u... ~ 0 1-0 _J
~ w z >-> <(
1-0 w et: -u u 0 (!)
Draft
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3
ES-05 Executive Summary-24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ........................................................................ 4 3
The Process ................................................................................................................................................... 6
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) ............................................................................. 6
PR-10 Consultation-91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) ................................................................................... 7
PR-15 Citizen Participation ...................................................................................................................... 12
Needs Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 15
NA-05 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 15
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment-24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) .................................................................... 16
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems-91.205 (b)(2) ........................................ 23
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems-91.205 (b)(2) ............................ 26
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens-91.205 (b)(2) .................................. 29
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion-91.205(b)(2) ..................................................... 30
NA-35 Public Housing-91.205(b) .......................................................................................................... 31
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment-91.205(c) .................................................................................... 37
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment-91.205 (b,d) ............................................................ 41
NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs-91.215 (f) ....................................................... 43
Housing Market Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 45
MA-05 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 45
MA-10 Number of Housing Units-91.210(a)&(b)(2) ............................................................................. 46
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing-91.210(a) ............................................................... 48
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing-91.210(a) ...................................................... 51
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing-91.210(b) .................................................................................... 54
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services-91.210(c) .............................................................................. 56
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services-91.210(d) ....................................................................... 58
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015}
Draft
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing-91.210(e) ................................................................................ 60
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets-91.215 (f) ...................................................... 61
MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ....................................................................................... 68
Strategic Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 70
SP-05 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 70
SP-10 Geographic Priorities-91.215 (a)(1) ............................................................................................ 71
SP-25 Priority Needs -91.215(a)(2) ......................................................................................................... 72
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions-91.215 (b) ................................................................................ 79
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement-91.215(c) ........................................................... 88
SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing-91.215(h) ................................................................................... 89
SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards-91.215(i) ........................................................................................... 90
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy-91.2150) ................................................................................................. 91
SP-80 Monitoring-91.230 ..................................................................................................................... 92
Expected Resources .................................................................................................................................... 93
AP-15 Expected Resources-91.220(c)(1,2) ........................................................................................... 93
Annual Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 95
Projects ................................................................................................................................................... 98
AP-35 Projects-91.220(d) ..................................................................................................................... 98
AP-38 Project Summary .......................................................................................................................... 99
AP-50 Geographic Distribution-91.220(f) ........................................................................................... 100
Affordable Housing ................................................................................................................................... 101
AP-55 Affordable Housing-91.220(g) ................................................................................................. 101
AP-60 Public Housing-91.220(h) ......................................................................................................... 102
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing-91.2200) ................................................................................. 103
AP-85 Other Actions-91.220(k) .......................................................................................................... 104
Program Specific Requirements ................................................................................................................ 107
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Executive Summary
ES-05 Executive Summary-24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
1. Introduction
In 2004 the City of Jefferson became an entitlement community for the Community Development Block
Grant program. The City uses a five-year planning period, and this Consolidated Plan for FY2014-FY2018
and the Annual Action Plan will become effective in January 2014.
2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment
Overview
The City's goals for the 2014-2018 planning period focus on continuing neighborhood revitalization
efforts, providing affordable housing and assisting low income, homeless and special needs residents
with supportive services. Specifically, the City will do the following:
Provide Decent, Affordable Housing:
Annually assist 5 to Glow to moderate income (LMI) homeowners with needed rehabilitation to address
code deficiencies, energy efficiency, accessibility and/or emergency repairs. Provide direct financial
assistance to 3 LMI households for purchasing a single family residence within the City limits.
Create Suitable Living Environments:
Invest City wide to eliminate slum and blight (demolition), improve public facilities and work toward a
greater accessibility of public infrastructure, especially sidewalks, to benefit people with disabilities and
residents traveling by food, bike or other non-vehicular forms.
Improve Economic Opportunity:
Assist low income and special needs residents by creating a Public Service Category of funding for local
non-profits. The eligible activities include, but not limited to employment services (e.g. job training),
crime prevention and public safety, child care, health services, substance abuse services (e.g., counseling
and treatment), fair housing counseling, education programs, services for senior citizens and services for
homeless persons.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 3
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
3. Evaluation of past performance
The city's past programs have focused on community needs that continue to exist including aging
housing and infrastructure, neighborhood and public improvements. The programs the city has used to
address these needs have been well received by residents and neighborhood organizations. The City of
Jefferson believes the programs proposed for the 2014 Action Plan year and goals for the five year
planning period similar to those used in the past continue to be the most efficient and effective use of
HUD block grant funds.
4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process
The stakeholder consultation and citizen input process for the City of Jefferson's Consolidated Plan
included the following:
1) A paper and online Needs Assessment Survey was offered on www.surveymonkey.com/s/JCMOCDBG.
A total of 78 individuals/groups responded to the survey. A link to the online survey was featured on the
City of Jefferson webpage.
2) Two public hearing meetings were held to discuss housing and community development needs held
June 10, 2013 and September 24, 2013. 12 residents and stakeholders attended the June 10, 2013
meeting. The meetings were held at City Hall which is ADA accessible near public transit.
To encourage participation by low income, minority, and special needs, several nonprofit social service
and housing organizations received email communication with public hearing notice about the
community meetings in June and September. According to the Citizen Participation Plan the public
notices were posted at City Hall, Missouri River Regional Library and Housing Authority.
3) Residents and stakeholders had many ways to communicate their opinions about the city's top
housing and community development needs: 1) Verbally, at one of the public hearings; 2) In written
form by submitting statement during the public hearing; and/or 3) by email to
jcplanning@jeffcitymo.org. Comments for the June 10, 2013 public hearing were taken through July 31,
2013. Comments for the September 24, 2013 public hearing on the draft Consolidated Plan will be taken
through October 24, 2013. The draft Consolidated Plan will be presented at the November 4, 2013, City
Council meeting which will be voted on for approval by resolution.
5. Summary of public comments
The June 10, 2013, public hearing generated both verbal and written comments regarding the usage of
CDBG funds for the 2014-2018 Consolidated Planning Period. Generally the comments were that CDBG
funds should go towards the support of services for the homeless and special needs
individuals. Another comment asked for support of an energy conservation program available to
landlords to aid in energy efficiency upgrades as it is difficult to keep tenants due to rising energy costs.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
4
Draft
6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them .
The comments that were produced as a result of the June 10, 2013, public hearing aided in the ·-. "
prioritizing the goals of expending CDBG funds.
I·
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 5
OMB Control No: 2506·0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
The Process
PR-OS Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those
responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source
The followlng are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and
those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/ Agency
Lead Agency JEFFERSON CITY
.
CDBG Administrator
Table 1-Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The City of Jefferson's Planning and Protective Services Department is responsible for preparing the
Consolidated Plan. City of Jefferson entitlement funding consists of the Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) which is administered by the Redevelopment and Grants Division. The CDBG program is
administered by the Neighborhood Services Coordinator.
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Ms. Jayme Abbott
Neighborhood Services Coordinator
320 McCarty St
Jefferson City, MO 65101
(573)634-6410 phone
jabbott@jeffcitvmo.org or jcplanning@jeffcitymo.org
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
6
Draft
PR-10 Consultation -91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1)
1. Introduction
Consultation on the development of the plan began in June 2013, and was achieved through a variety of
strategies, including public hearings, direct correspondence and surveys. All efforts were made to
contact appropriate parties and obtain thorough input. The~e,eonsultations, in conjunction with
participation from citizens, provided the plan direction and scope.
Summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted
housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies
Activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and governmental
health, mental health and service agencies are conducted on a regular basis. The City of Jefferson's
activities will include: 1) Starting in 2014 the city will encourage and accept funding applications from
housing, health care and service providers through its Annual Action Plan process. 2) The city staff
participates in local and regional committees such as the Unmet Needs Committee, Redeem Project and
Region Five Governor's Committee to End Homelessness. A continued coordination is anticipated for
planning efforts, as well as project implementation, between all of these groups.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of
homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with
children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness
The City of Jefferson is within Region 5 of the Balance of State (BoS) Continuum of Care. The BoS is
administered by the Missouri Governor's Committee to End Homelessness (GCEH).
The GCEH was established in 1987. The GCEH is comprised of Governor appointed committee consisting
of state departments, non-profit agencies, eight Continua of Care (CoC), and formerly homeless
citizens. The GCEH is responsible with raising awareness about homelessness and an advocate for
housing through resource collaboration.
The BoS also conducts quarterly Regional Housing Team Meetings (RHTM). These meetings are open to
members of the continuum, including BoS funded or non-funded agencies, service providers and
community stakeholders.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in
determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate
outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The Department of Social Services along with the Missouri Housing Development Commission (MHDC)
administers the ESG funds statewide. The application is accessed through MHDC's website under
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
7
Draft
Community Initiatives department. There is an advisory committee that consists of 23 members with
representation from each Missouri CoC, state departments and non-profits. The advisory committee
will create formal polices regarding ESG allocations, performance standards and HMIS policies and
procedures.
For the most recent allocation the Department of Social Services held a conference call with the lead
agency for each Continuum of Care. The purpose of the conference call was to determine allocation of
ESG funds, develop performance standards, evaluate outcome and address the administration of
HMIS. The feedback from the call was applied to the second allocation of 2011 and 2012 funds.
The City of Jefferson historically has not been a direct recipient of ESG funds. In 2011 and 2012 the
Jefferson City Salvation Army was a recipient of a $50,000 emergency shelter award.
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process
and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other
entities
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
8
Draft
1 Agency/Group/Organization CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services-Children
Services-Elderly Persons
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
Services-homeless
Services-Health
Services-Education
Services-Employment
Service-Fair Housing
Regional organization
What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment
Consultation? Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs-Families with children
Homelessness Needs -Veterans
Homelessness Needs-Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization A representative from CMCA attended the
consulted and what are the anticipated Consolidated Plan public hearings, assisted by taking
outcomes of the consultation or areas for Needs Assessment Surveys to the CMCA office for
improved coordination? distribution. Along with the City, CMCA participates
in the Unmet Needs Committee which is a
collaboration of local agencies
2 Agency/Group/Organization Department of Mental Health
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -State
What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment
Consultation? Public Housing Needs
Homeless ness Strategy
Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs -Families with children
Homeless ness Needs -Veterans
Homelessness Needs-Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
How was the Agency/Group/Organization A representative with DMH particpated in the
consulted and what are the anticipated Consolidated Plan Process by commenting during
outcomes of the consultation or areas for the public hearing. Attention was brought to the
improved coordination? MHDC Homeless Point in Time Count report which
was reviewed as part of the process.
3 Agency/Group/Organization Public Housing Authority
Agency/Group/Organization Type PHA
What section of the Plan was addressed by Public Housing Needs
Consultation?
How was the Agency/Group/Organization The PHA assisted with the sections within the Plan
consulted and what are the anticipated regarding Public Housing Needs. The Housing
outcomes of the consultation or areas for Authority board is approved by the Mayor and
improved coordination? council but is a separate, quasi-governmental entity.
4 Agency /Group/Organization MISSOURI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Other government -State
Planning organization
Balance of State Continuum of Care
What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment
Consultation? Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs -Families with children
Homeless ness Needs -Veterans
Homelessness Needs-Unaccompanied youth
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/Organization Homeless information was obtained from the State
consulted and what are the anticipated of Homelessness in Missouri: 2011 report. Also
outcomes of the consultation or areas for direct solicitation was made for Cole County
improved coordination? homeless ness figures for the Winter PIT
count.MHDC in collaboration with the DMH also
held a Housing Summit 2013 on August 7 & 8, 2013.
5 Agency/Group/Organization MISSOURI ASSOCIATION FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Agency/Group/Organization Type HMIS Provider for Balance of State Continuum of
Care
What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless ness Strategy
Consultation? Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs-Families with children
Homeless ness Needs -Veterans
Homeless ness Needs-Unaccompanied youth
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consulted with MASW for data concerning Cole
consulted and what are the anticipated County Point in Time Count information.
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Table 2-Agencies, groups, organizations who participated
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting
When developing the Consolidated Plan the City consulted with all known agencies either by email
distribution lists, public hearings, review of published reports, committee meetings, and other outreach
efforts.
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan
Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with
the goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care Missouri Housing The City of Jefferson will continue to support Balance of
Development State Continuum of Care's goals and objectives through
Commission projects funded locally.
Table 3 -Other local/ regional/ federal planning efforts
Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any
adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan
(91.215(1))
The City encouraged participation and comments on the Consolidated Plan by posting public hearing
and needs assessment survey on the City's website at www.jeffcitymo.org. Notification of the
Consolidated Plan process was sent out to City staff, Councilman, and area agencies. A representative
with the State Department of Mental Health participated by making a comment during the Consolidated
Plan Public Hearing on June 10, 2013.
Narrative (optional):
<p align="LEFT">Piease note that local agencies and service providers in City of Jefferson were invited to
participate in the Consolidated Plan process. These organizations were emailed links to the Needs
Assessment survey and invited to all public hearings.</p>
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 11
OMS Control No: 2506.0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
PR-15 Citizen Participation
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting
The first public hearing on the 2014-2018 Consolidated Plan was held in the Council Chambers on June 10, 2013 from 3:00pm to 5:00pm. Public
notice was published within the Jefferson City News Tribune on June 3, 2013 and on www.jeffcitymo.org. A needs assessment survey was made
available at www.surveymonkey.com/s/JCMOCDBG. Comments for the public hearing and completed surveys were accepted through July 31,
2013.
The second public hearing on the 2014-2018 Consolidated Plan was held in the Council Chambers on September 24, 2013 from 3:30pm-5:00
pm. Public notice was published within the Jefferson City News Tribune on September 9, 2013 and was posted at the Public Housing Authority
and Missouri River Regional library. Comments on the draft plan were accepted through October 24, 2013.
The draft Consolidated Plan was presented to the Public Works and Planning Commission on October 17, 2013. The City Council approved the
Consolidated Plan by Resolution at their November 4, 2013 meeting.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Summary of Summary of comments URL (If
response/attendance comments received not accepted applicable)
and reasons
1 Public Meeting Non-1st public hearing Copies of sign in
targeted/broad was held on June 10, sheets and
community 2013, in Council comments are
Chambers at City Hall attached. Verbal
which is ADA and written
accessible and near comments were
public transporation. submitted mostly
The purpose of this requesting CDBG
public hearing was to funding support for
start the homeless ness
Consolidated services and one
Planning Process. comment for
Twelve individuals energy
were in attendance. conservation
Organizations were program accessible
represented from the for landlords.
Department of
Mental Health,
Salvation Army and
Central Missouri
Community Action
Agency.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Summary of Summary of comments URL (If
response/ attendance comments rec~ived not accepted applicable)
and reasons
2 Public Meeting Non-2nd public hearing
targeted/broad was held on
community September 24, 2013,
in Council Chambers
at City Hall which is
ADA accessible and
near public
transportation. The
purpose of this public
hearing was to
review the draft
Consolidated Plan.
Table 4-Citizen Participation Outreach
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
Needs Assessment Overview
The Needs Assessment (NA) section of the City of Jefferson Consolidated Plan provides information on
the housing needs and problems of residents of varying income levels. The section also discusses the
needs of persons who are homeless; residents with special needs; and non-housing community
development needs.
The NA used data in the eCon Plan suite that were prepopulated by HUD; and local data on the rental
housing market from HUD Data Sets at http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/pdrdatas.html.
The needs identified were consistent with past needs, and include more affordable housing units for
households with incomes at or below 80 percent of area median income. Affordable housing units may
be either rental or owner occupied, but making the units available at an affordable rate is the present
need. Severe cost burden was identified as the main housing problem experienced by residents in the
Jefferson City area. One particular need that addresses affordable housing is housing rehabilitation.
Units that are not maintained properly and in a state of disrepair contribute to the overall cost of that
unit. Additionally, there is a need for elderly housing. The needs of the homeless are also for accessible
housing options, including emergency shelter and permanent housing. Community development needs
include facilities, improvements and public services. Over the next five years, these needs will be
consistently evaluated to determine whether they are diminishing or being eliminated. A needs
assessment is an ongoing process, and with each annual action plan will make adjustments to meet
those needs when necessary.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
15
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment -24 CFR~.205 (a,b,c)
Summary of Housing Needs
Draft
The Housing Needs Assessment section shows that households at all income levels and household types
are burdened with housing problems such as lacking complete plumbing, overcrowding and cost
burdens.
The demographics data comparison shows a 2% increase in population, a 3% decrease in thi! number of
households, and a 18% increase in the medain income. This would suggest that population is increasing
and more people are living together than on their own. Small family households and households with
one or more children under the age of 6 are more likely to have housing problems. There are three
times the renters living in substandard housing than owners; owners are less likely to live in substandard
conditions but still have the housing cost burden.
For the 2014-2018 Consolidated Plan, the City of Jefferson released a survey to see what the needs of
the community were according to residents. The survey was open until July 31, 2013. Some of the
highest responses included Residential Housing Rehab, Increase in single family housing and affordable
rental housing.
Demographics Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2009 %Change
Population 39,791 40,768 2%
Households 17,048 16,540 -3%
Median Income $39,628.00 $46,644.00 18%
Table 5 -Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2005-2009 ACS (Most Recent Year)
Number of Households Table
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% >100%
HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI
Total Households* 2,185 2,000 2,825 2,230
Small Family Households* 655 670 820 4,805
Large Family Households* 75 85 105 514
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 250 300 409 375 1,055
Household contains at least one
person age 75 or older 275 365 530 220 614
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or younger * 445 415 435 1,245
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 16
OMB Control No: 2506-Q117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
*the highest income category for these family types is >80% HAMFI
Table 6-Total Households Table
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 17
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Housing Needs Summary Tables
1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs)
Renter Owner
0-30% >30->50->80-Total 0-30% >30->50->80-Total
AMI SO% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing-
lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen facilities 25 0 10 15 50 0 0 0 15 15
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51
people per
room (and
complete
kitchen and
plumbing) 10 4 0 0 14 4 0 0 0 4
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per
room (and none
of the above
problems) 35 15 0 0 50 0 0 20 0 20
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
income (and
none of the
above
problems) 815 40 0 10 865 295 85 75 15 470
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
income (and
none of the
above
problems) 390 405 35 60 890 110 120 400 140 770
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Renter Owner
0-30% >30->50->80-Total 0-30% >30->50->80-Total
AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI SO% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
Zero/negative
Income (and
none of the
above
problems) 65 0 0 0 65 65 0 0 0 65
Table 7 -Housing Problems Table
Data 2005-2009 CHAS
Source:
2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: lacks kitchen
or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden)
Renter Owner
0->30->50->80-Total 0->30->50->80-Total
30% 50% 80% 100% 30% 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more of
four housing
problems 88S 60 10 2S 980 305 8S 95 30 515
Having none of four
housing problems 69S 1,18S 1,37S 990 4,245 17S 670 1,340 1,185 3,370
Household has
negative income, but
none of the other
housing problems 6S 0 0 0 6S 6S 0 0 0 65
Table 8-Housing Problems 2
Data 2005-2009 CHAS
Source:
3. Cost Burden > 30%
Renter Owner
0-30% >30->50-Total Q-30% >30->50-Total
AMI 50% 80% AMI 50% 80%
AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 460 220 0 680 145 so 26S 460
Large Related so 10 0 60 4 24 0 28
Elderly 184 25 4 213 17S 80 9S 3SO
Other S70 190 30 790 90 so 120 260
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Renter Owner
0-30% >30->50-Total 0-30% >30->50-Total
AMI SO% 80% AMI 50% 80%
AMI AMI AMI AMI
Total need by 1,264 445 34 1,743 414 204 480 1,098
income
Table 9-Cost Burden > 30%
Data 2005-2009 CHAS
Source:
4. Cost Burden> 50%
Renter Owner
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Sma II Related 375 30 0 405 . 110 25 35 170
Large Related so 10 0 60 4 20 0 24
Elderly 84 0 0 84 110 30 35 175
Other 365 0 0 365 75 10 10 95
Total need by 874 40 0 914 299 85 80 464
income
Table 10 -Cost Burden > 50%
Data 2005-2009 CHAS
Source:
5. Crowding (More than one person per room)
Renter Owner
0-30% >30->50->80-Total 0-30% >30->50->80-Total
AMI SO% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family
households 35 19 0 0 54 4 0 20 0 24
Multiple, unrelated
family households 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other, non-family
households 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Tot a I need by 45 19 0 0 64 4 0 20 0 24
income
Table 11-Crowding Information -1/2
Data 2005-2009 CHAS
Source:
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Renter Owner
0-30% >30->50-Total 0-30% >30->50-
AMI 50% 80% AMI 50% 80%
AMI AMI AMI AMI
Households with
Children Present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 12 -Crowdmg Information -2/2
Data Source
Comments:
What are the most common housing problems?
Total
0
The data presented indicates a need in the cost burdened households. Deferred maintenance, lack of
income/savings for down payments and poor credit scores are consistent with the needs of cost
burdened households. Strategies such as housing rehabilitation and down payment assistance were
identified as solutions to these problems.
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?
Data may suggest that households with one or more children 6 years old or younger and senior
households, particularly regarding deferred maintenance, and the homeless and at risk of homeless are
more likely to be cost burdened.
Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children
(especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of
either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the
needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing
assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance
The BoS CoC, which is administered by MHDC often see families who are "doubled-up~~. Doubled-up may
be families who are living with friends and family and are at risk of becoming homeless. Families in this
situation are doubled-up due to lack of employment, a change in family make-up or sub-standard
housing. ·
According to State of Missouri 2013-2017 Consolidated Plan the Homeless Prevention Rapid Re-Housing
Program (HPRP) served 19,107 households in Missouri. Loss of job or underemployment were the
typical characteristics of these households. MHDC has adjusted the Missouri Housing Trust Fund to meet
the needs of those nearing the termination of HPRP assistance.
If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a
description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to
generate the estimates:
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
21
Not applicable.
Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an
increased risk of homelessness
Draft
Substance abuse, mentat illness, unstable job history, prior evictions, criminal background, poor money
management, and domestic violence are all housing characteristics that have been linked with instability
and may cause an increased risk of homelessness.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 22
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems-91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to
the needs of that category of need as a whole.
Introduction
In this section, disproportionately greater need exists when the percentage of persons in a category of
need who are members of a particular racial or ethnic group is at least 10 percentage points higher than
the percentage of persons in a category as a whole. A summary of these findings is at the end of each
section.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,690 375 130
White 950 285 115
Black I African American 640 75 15
Asian 0 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 60 10 0
Table 13 -Disproportionally Greater Need 0 -30% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room,4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 670 1,330 0
White 555 1,070 0
Black/ African American 65 120 0
Asian 30 0 0
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 23
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 15 115 0
Table 14-Disproportionally""Greater Need 30-50% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four housing problems are:
1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 545 2,280 0
White 500 1,880 0
Black I African American 45 320 0
Asian 0 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 0 50 0
Table 15 -Disproportionally Greater Need 50 -80% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four housing problems are:
1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 255 1,975 0
White 195 1,825 0
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 24
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Black I African American 60 65 0
Asian 0 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 15 0
Hispanic 0 10 0
Table 16-Disproportionally Greater Need 80-100% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four housing problems are:
1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
Discussion
For the group of Oal 11130% of area medic
Black/ African American. For the group of 30al 11150% AM I, White
need. For the group of 50al i'i18Dit~friWimi~anican both have disproportionate
need. Finally, for those with 80al 111100% AMI, Wh
having a disproportionate need.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 25
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems-91.205
(b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to
the needs 'Of that category of need as a whole.
Introduction
In this section, disproportionately greater need exists when the percentage of persons in a category of
need who are members of a particular racial or ethnic group is at least 10 percentage points higher than
the percentage of persons in a category as a whole. A summary of these findings is at the end of each
section.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,190 870 130
White 625 600 115
Black I African American 490 220 15
Asian 0 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic so 20 0
Table 17-Severe Housing Problems 0-30% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 145 1,855 0
White 85 1,540 0
Black I African American 29 150 0
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 26
OMB Control No: 2506-Q117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Asian 30 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 ·0
Hispanic 0 130 0
Table 18-Severe Housing Problems 30 -50% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over SO%
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 105 2,715 0
White 85 2,290 0
Black I African American 20 345 0
Asian 0 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 0 so 0
Table 19-Severe Housing Problems 50 -80% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 27
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of Has none of the Household has
four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
ofthe-~her
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 55 2,175
White 40 1,980
Black I African American 15 105
Asian 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10
Pacific Islander 0 15
Hispanic 0 10
Table 20 -Severe Housing Problems 80 -100% AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
Discussion
Review of the data shows that the lowest income households report the majority of severe housing
problems-1,190 report having one or more of the four housing problems recognized by HUD. Of that
population, white households are predominately affected with 53% reporting severe housing
problems. By comparison, Black/African American Households report 41% having one or more housing
problems, American Indian and Alaska native and Hispanics reporting less than 1% and 4%
respectively. When considering that disproportionate need exists when a percentage of people in need
are at least ten percentage points higher than the percentage of people as a whole, both white and
black households in the lowest income tier meet that threshold.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 28
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens-91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to
the needs of that category of need as a whole.
Introduction:
In this section, disproportionately greater need exists when the percentage of persons in a category of
need who are members of a particular racial or ethnic group is at least 10 percentage points higher than
the percentage of persons in a category as a whole. A summary of these findings is at the end of each
section.
Housing Cost Burden
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No I negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 13,140 1,865 1,405 130
White 11,545 1,505 780 115
Black I African American 965 260 535
Asian 150 35 30
Am~rican Indian, Alaska
Native 30 0 10
Pacific Islander 15 0 0
Hispanic 225 20 50
Table 21 -Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
Discussion:
Review of the 2005-2009 CHAS data presented suggests that Jefferson City's lowest income white
households report the largest share of households that are cost burdened-11,545 households report
paying more than 30% of income towards housing. By comparison, Black/ African American households
in the lowest income bracket report 965 households that are cost burdened, 150 Asian households, 30
American Indian, Alaska Native households, 15 Pacific Islander households and 225 Hispanic
households.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
15
0
0
0
0
29
Draft
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion-91.205(b)(2)
Are there any Income categories in which a racial Q1 ethnic group has disproportionately
greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole?
The lowest income category has the most need as they cannot afford well maintained housing units, nor
can they spare the expense of repairs or maintenance in an owned property. In the areas examined, the
most need was found among Whites, and there were also elevated need levels for Black/African
American and Hispanics as well.
If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs?
The data reported represents the areas of need.
Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your
community?
The concentration of low income households is located within the Old Town section of the City. Old
Town is the downtown/central area of Jefferson City.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
30
Draft
NA-35 Public Housing-91.205(b)
Introduction
The Jefferson City Housing Authority (JCHA) provides management and oversight of all units and vouchers. Data and information provided on
public housing was provided by JCHA.
The JCHA operates 317 units of public housing in Jefferson City. The JCHA also administers the Section 8 Housing Voucher program for the
Jefferson City area. A Section 8 voucher assists eligible families pay the rent for apartments owned by private landlords. Participating families are
responsible for finding an apartment and landlord that will accept the voucher. Families must meet income guidelines to qualify for the Section 8
program. Both parties will enter into a lease agreement, with the tenant paying the security deposit. The JCHA inspects Section 8 properties
prior to move-in and on a yearly basis to ensure that apartments comply with HUD standards for safety, size and accessibility. The JCHA keeps a
list of Section 8 Landlords on its website. The Housing Authority also offers several affordable senior housing developments, some with units
accessible for persons with disabilities.
Totals in Use
Program Type
Certificate Mod-Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project-Tenant-
based based
# of units vouchers in use 0 0 313 191 0 189
Table 22 -Public Housing by Program Type
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification *
Supportive Program
Housing
0 0
31
0
Draft
Characteristics of Residents
Program Type
Certificate Mod-Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project-Tenant-Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family
Affairs Unification
Supportive Program
Housing
Average Annual Income 0 0 7,646 9,574 0 9,342 0 0
Average length of stay 0 0 2 3 0 3 0 0
Average Household size 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
#Homeless at admission 0 0 106 9 0 9 0 0
#of Elderly Program Participants
(>62) 0 0 14 20 0 20 0 0
# of Disabled Families 0 0 121 56 0 55 0 0
#of Families requesting accessibility
features 0 0 313 191 0 189 0 0
#of HIV/AIDS program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 23-Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 32
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Race of Residents
Program Type
Race Certificate Mod-Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project-Tenant-Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification *
Supportive Program
Housing
White 0 0 162 90 0 90 0 0 0
Black/ African American 0 0 148 101 0 99 0 0 0
Asian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
American Indian/ Alaska
Native 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Table 24-Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Ethnicity of Residents
Program Type
Ethnicity Certificate Mod-Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project-Tenant-Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification *
Supportive Program
Housing
Hispanic 0 0 4 6 0 6 0 0 0
Not Hispanic 0 0 309 185 0 183 0 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One:-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Table 25-Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 33
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
-;:::-
!! s: a
c: .g
Ill
§
.g
.5
:I:
~ u
0::
~ ::s
0 tn ns ~ Ill Q
~
iJ
z
0
~
L1J
LL
LL
L1J ....
c ro c:
"lJ
QJ ..... ro
~
0
tn c
0 u
in
.-I
0
.!:::!. .-I m r=:
0
d.
X
..!.
......
.-I
.-I
0
lb
0
Ill N
0 z e c
0 u
a1 :e
0
Draft
Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants
on the waiting list for accessible units:
Currently the Public Housing Waiting List has 265 families on it. Fifty-one percent of these families have
children. The majority of families on the waiting list are small with, 125 families qualifying for one
bedroom units and 99 qualifying for two bedroom units. Two families include elderly members and 48
families with disabled members are on the list. 99% of the families on the Public Housing Waiting list
have incomes under 30% of AMI. Needs include units that are elderly and disabled friendly.
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders
The City does not manage or oversee funding for the local Public Housing Authority. The Housing
Authority operates 318 units of public housing in the Jefferson City area.
Review of the Housing Authorities 5 Year Plan dated April 2012
(http:/ /www.jchamo.org/2012%20PHA%20Pian.pdf) had the following information:
The Housing Authority has determined that the most important factors for the families in its jurisdiction
are affordability, supply and quality of housing. Families without an elderly or disabled member feel that
accessibility and size are moderately important and location is relatively unimportant. However, families
with elderly or disabled members do place importance their home's proximity to public transportation,
schools, employment and shopping centers.
Currently the Public Housing Waiting List has 265 families on it. Fifty-one percent of these families have
children. The majority of families on the waiting list are small with, 125families qualifying for one
bedroom units and 99 qualifying for two bedroom units. Two families include elderly members and 48
families with disabled members are on the list. 99% of the families on the Public Housing Waiting list
have incomes under 30% of AMI.
The Section 8 Waiting List has 238 families on it. 98% of these families have incomes under 30%of AMI.
Fifty-seven percent of the families have children. Five families have disabled members and seven
families have elderly members.
How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large
According to the Analysis of the the Impediments to Fair Housing Study done in 2012, there is a need for
housing that is handicap accessible for the disabled and elderly and there is a need for affordable rental
housing in the area.
Discussion
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 35
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
The JCHA operates 317 units of public housing and administers the Section 8 Housing Voucher program
for the Jefferson City area. A Section 8 voucher assists eligible families pay the rent for apartments
owned by private landlords. The JCHA inspects Section 8 properties prior to move-in and on a yearly
basis to ensure that apartments comply with HUD standards for safety, size and accessibility. The JCHA
keeps a list of Section 8 Landlords on its website. The Housing Authority also offers several affordable
senior housing developments, some with units accessible for persons with disabilities.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 36
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment-91.205{c)
Introduction:
Homeless needs are found through a variety of ways: the Point in Time Count, Continuum of Care input through their regular meetings and
Governor's Committee to End Homelessness. The State of Homelessness in Missouri:2011 Report indicates that there are a total of 170
individuals who are homeless within Cole County Missouri. With the City of Jefferson being the capital of the state and holds the largest
population for the County it could be reasonably assumed most of the homeless population resides within city limits.
Homeless Needs Assessment
Draft
Population Estimate the # of persons Estimate the # Estimate the # Estimate the # Estimate the #
experiencing homelessness experiencing becoming exiting of days persons
on a given night homelessness homeless homelessness experience
each year each year each year homelessness
Sheltered Unsheltered
Persons in Households with Adult(s)
and Child(ren) 110 9 0 0 0 0
Persons in Households with Only
Children 0 0 0 0 0 0
Persons in Households with Only
Adults 0 32 0 0 0 0
Chronically Homeless Individuals 0 4 0 0 0 0
Chronically Homeless Families 0 0 0 0 0 0
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied Child 0 0 0 0 0 0
Persons with HIV 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 26 -Homeless Needs Assessment
Alternate Data Source Name:
State of Homelessness In Missourl2011 Report
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 37
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Draft
Data Source Comments: Report may be viewed at http://www.mhdc.com/ci/documents/SHM_2011.pdf
Indicate if the homeless population is: Has No Rural Homeless
If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of
days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically
homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth):
Jefferson City participates in Region 5 of the Balance of State CoC which includes the MASW HMIS system. The 2011 Missouri Homeless Study
was able to compile information from seven of the eight CoC's in the state showing 5,224 individuals in families stayed in an emergency shelter,
transitional housing program, or both in the 2010 calendar year; this number makes up 44% of those persons staying in emergency shelters,
transitional housing programs, or both. Although this is a duplicated number and it does not specify how many families make up the total
number of individuals, it still shows that homeless families are a large part of Missouri's homeless population.
The number of chronically homeless individuals continues to be a rising issue in the state of Missouri. From 2009 to 2010 the state saw a 44%
increase in individuals counted during the Point in Time Counts totaling 1,287 individuals-977 sheltered and 310 unsheltered.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 38
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional)
Race: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
White 34
Black or African American 6
Asian 0
American Indian or Alaska
Native 0
Pacific Islander 14
Ethnicity: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic 0
Not Hispanic 0
Alternate Data Source Name:
MO Balance of State CoC: Cole County
Data Source
Comments: Report may be viewed at http:/ /www.mhdc.com/ci/documents/SHM_2011.pdf
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with
children and the families of veterans.
58
21
1
0
1
0
0
According to the Balance of State CoC Cole County January 2013 survey there were no families of
veterns who where homeless in Cole County. Potentially the reason for this is that Columbia which is
approximately 30 miles away from Jefferson City has the Harry S. Truman Veterns Hospital; wh_ich offers
services to Veterns and their families.
Assistance for families with childrens appears to be of most critical need. The Balance of State CoC Cole
County January 2013 survey shows a total of 21.95% of the homeless being households with children at
emergency shelters. Base on this survey the 34.15% report domestic violence as the primary reason for
homeless ness.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.
According to the State of Homeless ness in Missouri: 2011 Report within Region 5 {where Jefferson City
is located) the sheltered homeless population 65.8% White, 27.3% Black, 6.3% two or more races, 0.3%
Asian and 0.3% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.3%. The unsheltered homeless population was 58%
White, 21% Black, 17% two or more races, 1% American Indian/Native American, 1% Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and 2% unkown.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 39
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
On page 57 of the State of Homelessness in Missouri: 2011 Report stated the following:
Of the total sheltered homeless, about half were women (50.1%) and half were men {49.9%); the
majority were White (78.5%), while 16.5% were Black, and the remaining 5% were persons identifying
two or more races {4.4%) and other race {0.6%). Of those counted in the sheltered homeless total, the
BoS CoC also reported that more than half {56%) were persons with a disability, 26.6% were chronically
homeless, 22.4% were persons affected by domestic violence; and 11.2% were veterans. Most {52.4%)
of the sheltered homeless were adults between 18 and 45 years of age, although one in three were
children 17 years old or younger and 16.3% were 46-60 years of age. It was also reported that 3.9% of
the sheltered homeless were unaccompanied youth.
Of those counted in the unsheltered homeless total, the Balance of State CoC reported that 42% persons
as having a disability, 8% as chronically homeless, 5% as persons affected by domestic violence; and 6%
as veterans. Most {52.4%) of the unsheltered homeless were adults between 18 and 45 years of age,
although one in three were children {17 years old and younger) and 16.3% were 46-60 years of age. No
unaccompanied youth were identified in the unsheltered homeless population, which is not indicative of
. the region{s) having no unaccompanied youth among the unsheltered homeless but rather that the
number and percent of unaccompanied youth among the unsheltered homeless is really unknown
within the continuum.
The Balance of State contains 101 counties which many are in rural or non-metropolitan
areas. Information within the report was not broken down into charts by county or city.
Discussion:
Cole County has a total of 2 emergency shelters to serve the homelessness. One shelter is the Rape and
Abuse Crisis Center and the other is the Salvation Army. These agencies participates
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 40
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment-91.205 (b,d)
Introduction:
Special Needs Housing is defined as developments that provide permanent supportive housing and
integrated housing for persons with special needs. Persons with special needs are those that are
physically, emotionally or mentally impaired or suffer from mental illness, developmentally disabled, a
youth aging out of foster care, persons with addictions, HIV I AIDS and their families, and victims of
domestic violence.
There are consistent patterns between the special needs population and the increased risk for
homelessness because of lack of adequate housing facilities and services available. These
populations not only need permanent housing, but also integrated services to decrease their risk for
homelessness. Funding is also always an issue when dealing with non-homeless needs. The amount of
adequate funding never seems to be available.
Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community:
Persons with special needs are those that are physically, emotionally or mentally impaired or suffer from
mental illness, developmentally disabled, a youth aging out of foster care, persons with addictions,
HIV/AIDS and their families, and victims of domestic violence.
What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these
needs determined?
The housing and supportive service needs of these populations include: New Unit Production,
Rehabilitation, Tenant Based Rental Assistance, job training and placement assistance. The Missouri
Housing Development Commission, The Department of Health and Senior Services ad Department of
Social Services play key roles in determining the needs of these populations.
Special needs populations typically work with a case manager or other staff with a service agency, who
will help to coordinate housing and services. They will also help to coordinate services that they do not
provide, such as mental health or substance abuse programs and services. Modifications to housing
units such as ramps or modified bathrooms are needed for elderly and disabled households.
Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV I AIDS and their families within
the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area:
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 41
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015}
According to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services 2012 Epidemiologic profile there
are 55 persons living with HIV within Cole County. This figure does not include individuals diagnosed in
correctional facilities. The report can be viewed at
http:/ /health.mo.gov/data/hivstdaids/pdf/MOHIVSTD2012.pdf.
Discussion:
There are many organizations that work together to increase the housing and services for the special
needs community. Team work between organizations plays an important role in the success of
establishing and running effective programs. Pathways in Jefferson City is currently constructing an
eight-unit, affordable, supportive housing complex for low-income people who are homeless, with an
emphasis on those affected by a disability.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
42
NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs-91.215 (f)
Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Facilities:
Areas within the City of Jefferson have identified public facility needs, and some of those are best met
through a city capital improvement program, general funding or other public allocation. Some of the
needs, however, are found in low to moderate income neighborhoods outside the scope of these other
public facility planning efforts, and may include neighborhood centers, senior centers, recreation
facilities, or accessibility modifications in public facilities.
How were these needs determined?
Public Facility needs were determined through public input via the Needs Assessment Survey, agency
and stakeholder consultation, and staff recommendation.
Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements:
Public improvement needs exist citywide. Like the public facilities, some improvements will be
accomplished using other funding streams that are not part of this consolidated planning process.
However some of the included needs are infrastructure improvements such as sidewalks, gurb gutter,
water/sewer and bridges, "way finding" signs, greenways, rehabilitation to existing neighborhood
centers.
How were these needs determined?
Public improvement needs were determined through public input via the Needs Assessment Survey,
agency and stakeholder consultation, and staff recommendation.
Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Services:
There are many public service needs, including transportation, programs for job searches and training,
programs for seniors, food pantry services, and services for the homeless ness.
How were these needs determined?
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-Q117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
43
Public services needs were determined through public input via the Needs Assessment Survey~ agency
and stakeholder consultation~ and staff recommendation.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
44
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 OveNiew
Housing Market Analysis Overview:
This section provides information on the affordability and condition of the housing market in City of
Jefferson. Many of the data tables were are prepopulated by HUD and use the American Community
Survey (ACS) and Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy {CHAS) five year {2005-2009) dataset.
ACS data shows that the City has a total of 18,625 housing units with a homeownership rate of
approximately 60%.
2005-2009 CHAS data shows that the majority of Missouri housing stock was built between 1950 and
1979; 7,230 units. The second largest category consists of housing units built between 1980-1999; 4,744
and units built before 1950 comprise the third largest category with a total of 3,005. Units built after
2000 total 1,561. With the majority of the housing units being constructed prior to 1980 poses a great
risk for lead based paint issues.
The City is currently in process of compiling an abandoned and vacant properties listing. Approximately
109 residential structures have been identified as potentially meeting the criteria.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 45
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
MA-10 Number of Housing Units-91.210(a)&(b)(2)
Introduction
According to ACS data, the City of Jefferson housing units are primarily 1 unit detached
structure. Approximately 48% of all residential units are comprised of 2 bedrooms .
. All residential properties by number of units
Property Type Number
1-unit detached structure 11,637
1-unit, attached structure 610
2-4 units 2,950
5-19 units 2,462
20 or more units 807
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 159
Total 18,625
Table 27-Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Unit Size by Tenure
%
Owners Renters
Number % Number
No bedroom 0 0% 92
1 bedroom 98 1% 1,954
2 bedrooms 1,344 14% 3,183
3 or more bedrooms 8,462 85% 1,407
Total 9,904 100% 6,636
Table 28-Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
62%
3%
16%
13%
4%
1%
100%
%
1%
29%
48%
21%
99%
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with
federal, state, and local programs.
Public Housing Authority is the main source of housing for the area. The City has a Neighborhood
Services Reinvestment Act programs that assist individuals within the "old town" with down payment
assistance and/or tax abatement for purchasing single family properties that were previously vacant
within the past 12 months. There are no income requirements to participate in the program, it is open
to all.
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for
any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 46
OMB Control No: 2506-Q117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
According to the public housing authority, there will not be a Joss of any units from the affordable
housing inventory. All expiring Section 8 contracts are renewed as they approach the expiration date.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?
The Jefferson City Housing Authority previously opened its waiting list after it had been closed for six
years. The average wait time for a voucher is between 3 and 4 years in Jefferson City.
Describe the need for specific types of housing:
According to the Jefferson City .Housing Authority, there is an adequate number of accessible public
housing units to meet the needs of the current residents and applicants.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015}
47
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing-91.210(a)
Introduction
Home values have fluctuated in recent years. Foreclosures and short sales drastically reduced values
from their housing boom value. Although this adjustment made many units affordable, the
simultaneous economic downturn made acquiring these properties difficult. The housing market
continues to stabilized, and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program and down payment assistance
programs have allowed units to become and remain affordable. There are, however, many units in need
of rehabilitation, which can increase the cost of these units. Previous tables and data paints a
picture that cost burden may be the biggest housing problem for any households.
Cost of Housing
Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2009 %Change
Median Home Value 97,700 128AOO 31%
Median Contract Rent 353 421 19%
Table 29 -Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2005-2009 ACS (Most Recent Year)
Rent Paid Number %
Less than $500 4,842 73.0%
$500-999 1,734 26.1%
$1,000-1A99 29 0.4%
$1,500-1,999 11 0.2%
$2,000 or more 20 0.3%
Total 6,636 100.0%
Table 30 -Rent Paid
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Housing Affordability
% Units affordable to Households Renter Owner
earning
30% HAMFI 955 No Data
50% HAMFI 2,800 845
80% HAMFI 3,165 1,595
100% HAMFI No Data 2,820
Total 6,920 5,260
Table 31 -Housing Affordability
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 48
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Monthly Rent
Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom
bedroom)
Fair Market Rent 0 0 0 0
High HOME Rent 0 0 0 0
Low HOME Rent 0 0 0 0
Table 32-Monthly Rent
Data Source Comments:
Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels?
According to the 2005-2009 ACS the median contract rent in Jefferson City was $421 monthly. That
reflects an increase of $68 increase since 2000 {$353 median contract rent). Based on the HUD
standards that a household should not pay more than 30% of its gross income for a housing unit to be
considered affordable a houshold would need to earn $16,840 annually to afford the median contract
rent.
The median value of an owner occupied housing unit in 2009 was $128,400, an increase of 31% since
2000 {$97,700). Using the industry standard of three {3) times income to afford a 2009 median priced
home in Jefferson City, a household would need to earn $42,800 annually to affordably own a home in
Jefferson City.
Comparably approximately 73% rent paid is less than $500 per month. The fair market value for a two
bedroom unit is $595 according to HUD data set. According to those figures it appears that sufficient
housing is available to all income levels.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/ or
rents?
With the increase in rental contracts and home values since 2000 the affordability of residential units
may decrease. Currently 73% of all rent paid is less than $500 with approximately 69% units being 2 or
more bedrooms.
How do HOME rents I Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this
impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
City is not a receipient of HOME funds. Data for HOME rents and Fair Market Rent is not available for
the area.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMS Control No: 2506-()117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
0
0
0
49
According to HUD Datasets Jefferson City's Fair Market rent for a two bedroom is $595 per
month. This in association with 73% of rent paid is less than $500 per month shows that the figures are
in align with each other.
Discussion
HUD considers a housing unit affordable if the occupant household expends no more than 30% of its
income on housing cost. In the situation where the household expends greater than 30% of its income
on housing cost, the household is considered cost burdened. Cost burdened households have less
financial resources to meet other basic needs {food, clothing, transportation, medical, etc.), less
resources to properly maintain the housing structure, and are at greater risk for foreclosure or eviction.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506·0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
so
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing-91.210(a)
Introduction
The need for rehabilitation has already been discussed in the previous sections. Many units in the
Jefferson City area are older than 1999, thus needing repair to provide safe, decent, and affordable
housing. Conditions of units may be associated with 1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. lacks
complete plumbing facilities, 3. more than one person per room, 4. cost burden greater than 30%.
According to the Conditions of Units chart approximately 27% of renters and 1SDA, owners experience
one of the previoulsy mentioned conditions.
Definitions
Substandard condition could be be defined as housing that does not meet local buflding, fire, health and
safety codes. Substandard condition but suitable for rehabilitation may be defined as housing that does
not meet local building, fire, health and safety codes but is both financially and structurally feasible for
rehabilitation. It may be finanically unfeasible for to rehab a substandard structure when costs
exceed 30-50% of the assessed value of the property.
Condition of Units
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
With one selected Condition 1,496 15% 1,821 27%
With two selected Conditions 0 0% 70 1%
With three selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 8,408 85% 4,745 72%
Total 9,904 100o/o 6,636 100o/o
Table 33 -Condition of Units
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Year Unit Built
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
2000 or later 1,048 11% 513 8%
1980-1999 2,841 29% 1,903 29%
1950-1979 4,258 43% 2,972 45%
Before 1950 1,757 18% 1,248 19%
Total 9,904 101o/o 6,636 101%
Table 34-Year Unit Built
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 51
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 6,015 61% 4,220 64%
Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 1,545 16% 825 12%
Table 35 -Risk of Lead-Based Paint
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Total Units) 2005-2009 CHAS (Units with Children present)
Vacant Units
Suitable for Not Suitable for Total
Rehabilitation Rehabilitation
Vacant Units 0 0
Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0
REO Properties 0 0
Abandoned REO Properties 0 0
Table 36-Vacant Units
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
The need for owner and rental rehabilitation is greatly needed due to the aging housing stock. Housing
units may need rehabilitation such as code deficiencies, ADA modifications, energy efficiency and
general maintenance. Conditions of units may be associated with 1. lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2.
lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. more than one person per room, 4. cost burden greater than 30%.
According to the Conditions of Units chart approximately 27% of renters and 15% owners experience
one of the previoulsy mentioned conditions.
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP
Hazards
Lead based paint was banned in 1978. Approximately 62% of housing in the Jefferson City was
constructed before 1980. Therefore a majority of the housing units available may contain lead based
paint hazard. Approximatly 12% of renters and 16% owners with children resides in these units with
potential lead based paint hazards.
Discussion
The existing housing stock in Jefferson City is aging. Over 60% of units were constructed prior to
1980. This represents multiple potential issues such as lead based paint hazards and construction that
was not sensitive to ADA for the senior and disabled population.
0
0
0
0
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 52
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 53
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing-91.210(b)
Introduction
The City of Jefferson does not manage or oversee the Public Housing Authority. The Mayor appoint members to the PHA Executive Board.
Totals Number of Units
Program Type
Certificate Mod-Rehab Public Vouchers
Housing Total Project -based Tenant-based Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans Family
Affairs Unification
Supportive Program
Housing
# of units vouchers
available 0 0 318 231 24 207 0 0
# of accessible units
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Table 37-Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Describe the supply of public housing developments:
Disabled
•
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an
approved Public Housing Agency Plan:
There are 318 public housing units in the jurisdiction. The physical condition of the units is superior as per the HUD Housing Quality Standards
and the REAC annual inspection protocol.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 54
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
0
Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score
Jefferson City Public Housing Authority 90
Tab'e 38 -Public Housing Condition
Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction:
To implement the deferred maintenance on public housing units, implementing the Capital Fund five (5)
year plan, would cost$ 9,700,000.00
Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low-
and moderate-income families residing in public housing:
The goal of the Public Housing Authority is to provide improved living conditions for very low and low
income families while maintaining their rent payments at an affordable level. To operate a socially and
financially sound public housing agency that provides decent, safe and sanitary housing within a drug
free, suitable living environment for tenants and their families. To avoid concentration of economically
and socially deprived families in any one or all of the PHA's public housing developments.
The Authority continues to offer low income families affordable housing. It works closely with local
police to keep the neighborhoods drug free and to avoid crime in the area. The Authority tries to attract
a variety of families of various socio-economic backgrounds to each of its public housing developments.
Discussion:
City of Jefferson does not manage or oversee funds to the Public Housing Authority. The questions in
this section are answered only from the perspective of the PHA.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
55
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services-91.210(c)
Introduction
Jefferson City area has two shelters: the Salvation Army Center of Hope and Rape and Abuse Crisis Center.
The Salvation Army Center of Hope has a 40 bed capacity available to men, women, and families with children. The Center of Hope offers a 90
day shelter that provides hot meals, a safe place to sleep, case management to help residents to plan for independent living, life skills classes,
professional referrals, and laundry facilities.
The Jefferson City Rape & Abuse Crisis Service serves 9 Central Missouri counties providing shelter, court advocacy, counseling, 24 hour hotline,
crisis intervention, support groups and case management to domestic and sexual abuse victims. They provide emergency shelter to 36 residents
not including baby cribs.
Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional Permanent Supportive Housing
Housing Beds Beds
Year Round Beds Voucher/ Current & New Current & New Under
(Current & New) Seasonal/ Development
Overflow Beds
Households with Adult(s) and
Child(ren) 76 0 0 0
Households with Only Adults 0 0 0 0
Chronically Homeless Households 0 0 0 0
Veterans 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied Youth 0 0 0 0
Table 39 -Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Alternate Data Source Name:
MO Balance of State CoC: Cole County
Data Source Comments:
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 56
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
0
0
0
0
0
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the
extent those services are use to complement services targeted to homeless persons
The City is located within the Balance of State Continuum. Each continuum provides oversight of federal
homeless assistance dollars and collaborates with local communities to provide the best service to our
residents who are homeless. In addition to local level supports, each continuum holds an appointed seat
on the Governor's Committee to End Homeless ness.
The City of Jefferson participates in Unmet Needs Committee that is comprised of Central Missouri
Community Action Agency, Samaritan Center, Red Cross, United Way, Jefferson City Public Schools,
Health Department, Food Pantry, etc. During meetings the committee provide updates and provides
information on their current needs of their clients. Usually the outcome includes multiple agencies
teaming up to meet the needs of those said clients.
List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly
chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their
families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40
Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services,
describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.
Governor's Committee to End Homeless ness provides the oversight of homelss assistance in
Missouri. GCEH members include Department of Social Services, Department of Health and Senior
Services, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of Economic Development,
Veterans Administration, Social Security Administration, Balance of State Continuum of Care, Missouri
Housing Development Corporation, Public Housing Authorities, Head Start, Missouri Association for
Community Action Department of Mental Health, Missouri Association of Social Welfare, United States
Department of Agriculture, Salvation Army, Missouri Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence,
etc.
Locally, the Salvation Army Center of Hope has a 40 bed capacity available to men, women, and families
with children. The Center of Hope offers a 90 day shelter that provides hot meals, a safe place to sleep,
case management to help residents to plan for independent living, life skills classes, professional
referrals, and laundry facilities. The Jefferson City Rape & Abuse Crisis Service serves 9 Central Missouri
counties providing shelter, court advocacy, counseling, 24 hour hotline, crisis intervention, support
groups and case management to domestic and sexual abuse victims. They provide emergency shelter to
36 residents not including baby cribs.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 57
OMB Control No: 2506-Q117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services-91.210(d)
Introduction
There are a variety of service providers in Jefferson City. These providers coordinate amongst
themselves to ensure that they are meeting the needs of the community to the best of their
abilities. One of the ways they coordinate is through the area's unmet needs committee. This
committee is a chance for service providers to have a round table discussion about updates and changes
in their organizations and a chance for them seek assistance and advice if needed.
Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental),
persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV I AIDS and their families,
public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe
their supportive housing needs
According to the U.S. Census 2010 American Community Survey there are 5,580 people (14% of the total
population) in Jefferson City with a disability (civilian, non-institutionalized). The 65 and over category
has the largest percentage of disabled population, and the 18 to 64 category has the largest number of
disabled persons. Data indicates the need for specialized housing for disabled persons, particularly given
the high prevalence of disabilities in the older population groups. The need for specialized housing is
dependent on the type of disability. Such housing may be specialized in terms of physical modifications,
sleeping accommodations, organizational structure, security monitoring, and staffing with applicable
supportive services.
Most home features needed to allow independent living by persons with physical mobility disabilities
can be incorporated into new construction without substantially altering the standard unit floor
plan. Retrofitting an existing unit is a more expensive, and therefore less cost-effective alternative, but
necessary for those disabled households which would like to comfortably "age in place" and not have to
move from their long-time homes due to developing physical mobility limitations.
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health
institutions receive appropriate supportive housing
There area a variety of agencies in the Jefferson City area that provide housing options and case
management assistance for those returning from mental and physical health institutions. They provide
the option of living independently in a group setting. The state of Missouri Department of Mental Health
also offers on housing assistance options such as rental assistance, home purchasing program, home
repair/weatherization assistance, home access modifications. The independent living resource center in
Jefferson City offers programs that provide people with the tools to learn how to live independently
including cooking, budgeting, reading and finding employment. They also offer disability assistance for
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 58
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
improvements on homes for people with disabilities. The unmet needs group is also a good resource for
case management.
Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address
the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with
respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year
goals. 91.315(e)
Through the City's Homeowner Assistance Programs, we are able to offer assistance for ADA
improvements on homes. We set goals every year on how many homes we are aim to complete based
on our allocation. In addition non-profits will be able to apply for public assistance funds which may
assist with TBRA, transportation, education, nutrition, etc.
For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to
undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs
identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but
have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2))
Through the City's Homeowner Assistance Programs, we are able to offer assistance for ADA
improvements on homes. We set goals every year on how many homes we are aim to complete based
on our allocation. In addition non-profits will be able to apply for public assistance funds which may
assist with TBRA, transportation, education, nutrition, etc.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
59
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing-91.210(e)
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment
There are no identified public policies that negatively impact affordable housing and residential
investment. The current Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing for City of Jefferson found a number of
local barriers. Barriers included 1) lack of adequate funding allocated for fair housing enforcement and
outreach activities; 2) lack of fair housing awareness; inadequate information and awareness of City's
housing programs; 3) lack of fair housing testing to determine where fair housing discrimination is taking
place; 4) concentration of affordable rental housing in certain neighborhoods with higher minority and
low income populations; 5) need for ADA education and the lack of availability of housing for persons
with disabilities; and 6) lack of specific and comprehensive planning efforts around affirmatively
furthering fair housing in the City of Jefferson. Plan goals and projects will attempt to address these
barriers. An example of such a project may include housing rehabilitation, where the scope of work may
address the accessibility of a unit.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 60
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets-91.215 {f)
Introduction
Jefferson City has a well-developed economic base that provides employment opportunities due in large part, to its designation as the State
Capital and the Cole County Seat. The national economic downturn in recent years has affected the Jefferson City area as many others, and
unemployment in Jefferson City has risen significantly from 4.5% in July 2007 to 6.3% in July 2012, with the State of Missouri exhibiting an even
higher July 2012 unemployment rate of 7.2% (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics).
Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity
Business by Sector Number of Number of Jobs Share of Workers Share of Jobs Jobs less workers
Workers % % %
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 86 199 0 0 0
Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 1,258 2,559 6 6 0
Construction 985 1,235 5 3 -2
Education and Health Care Services 3,959 5,558 20 13 -7
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 1,129 4,147 6 10 4
Information 616 640 3 2 -1
Manufacturing 1,516 588 8 1 -7
Other Services 952 1,943 5 5 0
Professional, Scientific, Management Services 1,759 1,333 9 3 -6
Public Administration 3,998 15,039 20 36 16
Retail Trade 2,318 4,476 12 11 -1
Transportation and Warehousing 628 628 3 2 -1
Wholesale Trade 496 2,883 3 7 4
Total 19,700 41,228 ------
Table 40 -Business Activity
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Workers), 2010 ESRI Business Analyst Package (Jobs)
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 61
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 20,669
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 19,700
Unemployment Rate 4.69
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 14.15
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 2.45
Table 41 -Labor Force
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 8,441
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 23
Service 2,761
Sales and office 5,080
Construction, extraction, maintenance and
repair 1,163
Production, transportation and material moving 2,232
Table 42 -Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Travel Time
TravelTime Number Percentage
< 30 Minutes 17,567 91%
30-59 Minutes 1,445 7%
60 or More Minutes 294 2%
Total 19,306 lOOo/o
Table 43 -Travel Time
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Education:
Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older)
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force
Less than high school graduate 806 89 1,213
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 3,694 238 1,626
Some college or Associate•s degree 4,122 152 1,377
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 62
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force
Bachelor's degree or higher 6,857 43 911
Table 44-Educational Attainment by Employment Status
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Educational Attainment by Age
Age
18-24 yrs 25-34yrs 35-44 yrs 45-65 yrs 65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade 59 50 199 199 688
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 586 645 529 486 595
High school graduate, GED, or
alternative 1,827 1,473 1,363 2,752 1,975
Some college, no degree 2,183 1,189 1,015 2,239 920
Associate's degree 176 233 283 749 208
Bachelor's degree 445 1,807 1,322 2,435 638
Graduate or professional degree 100 520 481 1,319 534
Table 45 -Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Educational Attainment-Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Less than high school graduate 14,810
High school graduate (includes equivalency) 25,710
Some college or Associate's degree 33,463
Bachelor's degree 41,831
Graduate or professional degree 49,710
Table 46 -Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within
your jurisdiction?
The City of Jefferson has job opportunities in a fairly diversified economy, and the character of its
population is reflected in the major industries of employment. The major employment sectors in order
are: 1) management, business and financial 2) sales and office 3) service 4) production, transportation
and materialS) construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 6) farming, fisheries and forestry.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
63
. The top ten employers located in Jefferson City provide a total of 26,706 jobs in a variety of fields. They
are:
1. State of Missouri-18,203
2. Scholastic, Inc. -1,500
3. Capital Region Medical Center-1,450
4. St. Mary's Health Center -1,200
5. Jefferson City Public School District -1,106
6. Wai-Mart -783
7. Central Bank-750
8. ABB Power T&D Solutions --625
9. Jefferson City Medical Group-564
10. RR Donnelley-525
*Source: City of Jefferson 2009 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community:
The business community workforce appear to be mostly business-professionals of a white collar
nature. Jefferson City is the Capital of Missouri therefore comprises mostly of state government office
buildings, legislatures, lobbiest, etc. There are several manufactoring and distribution centers located
within the City therefore production, transportation and material is still an importance workforce.
To support the infrasture needs of the business community involves planning, repair and/or
improvement as needed. There are times throughout the year when traffic within the City increases
due to legislation, state government trainings, organizational conferences, university events, etc. The
City in conjunction with MODOT has plans to address the US 50/Lafayette area. Project includes new
entrance/exit ramps, multiple bridge replacement/rehabilitation, way finding signs, etc. The project is
expected to be completed by 2016.
Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or
regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect
job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for
workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
Currently the City is in process of planning a hotel and convention center. Two proposals were
presented to the council included constructing approximately 130 to 150 bed capacity hotel and
conference center. The construction of a conference center may have an impact to the economy as jobs
would be produced for the center, additional conferences could be brought to the City which would
boost the local economy, etc.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 64
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Recently Wai-Mart announced plans for constructing a Sam's Club in Jefferson City. Nationwide Sam's
employs approximately 110,000 people with the average building size 134,000 sq ft. It is estimated that
Sam's will hire over 100 new jobs not including potential new jobs created by the construction of the
building.
Both local hospitals, Capital Region and St. Mary, are expanding. Capital Region plans for a 125,000
square foot expansion of the Madison Street hospital campus by one third with plans to consolidate
many of the specialty physician services into one location. The expected cost of this project is about $35
million with a potential of about 100 new jobs. St. Mary is constructing a new 150 patient room
hospital out towards the west end of town off HWY 179. The project is estimated to cost $200 million
with plans to open in November 2014.
On the other hand a local major employer, RR Donnelley recently announced that they will be shutting
down their Jefferson City plant. Over 500 jobs are affected by this closure. The education level of RR
Donnelley employees may consist of primarily high school education. The Department of Economic
Development indicated that Missouri's Employment Transition Team will meet with employees, but a
date has not been set yet. That team will help employees access job postings and may look into creating
a job fair.
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment
opportunities in the jurisdiction?
The 2005-2009 ACS Data appears to support that the skills and education of the area correspond with
the employment opportunities. Approximately 40% of the area workforce has obtained their bachelors
degree or higher. This corresponds with the Occupation by Sector table showing that Management,
business and financial sector has the highest number of people with 8,441 or 43%. The management,
business and financial sector usually requires an education of a bachelor's or higher to hold those
positions. The next area is Sales and Office sector which has 5,080 people or 26% of the workforce. This
sector may or may not require an education beyond high school diploma or equivalency.
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce
Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts
will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
Central Missouri Community Action Agency currently offers Missouri Work Assistance. Individuals who
are currently receiving Temporary Assistance (TA) AND who are referred for MWA services by the Family
Support Division (FSD) are eligible. The Missouri Work Assistance program works with individuals
receiving TA to help them become job ready. Individuals receive a complete assessment and orientation
to help them explore career choices and aptitudes. Staff provide case management services to the
individuals to assist them in overcoming barriers that may prevent them from obtaining or keeping
employment. Each participant is required to be in acceptable activities for a specific number of hours
each week. Participants who are in an acceptable work or school related activity, where travel is
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 65
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
involved, may receive a travel allowance payment. This payment is called a Transportation
Reimbursement Expense and can be up to $5.00 per day. Participants may also receive up to $350.00
per year to help with Work Related Expenses (i.e. uniforms, steel toed shoes, etc.). Tuition assistance for
approved programs and schools may also be available.
Linn Technical College offered training through the MOHealthWINs and MOManufacturingWINs. Free
classes were offered to adults 18 and over that are unemployed, underemployed, low-skilled, or TAA
affected. Courses included digital literacy, office clerk/customer service, computer support technician,
systems administration, introduction to maintenance, biomed equipment technician. Machining classes
offered were measurement, materials and safety; job planning, bench work and layout; CNC turning
operator and CNC milling operator.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
(CEDS)?
Yes
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated
with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that
impact economic growth.
The Mid-MO Regional Planning Commission's 5 year Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
includes Cole County. Information was found at
http://mmrpc.org/plans/Economic%20Development/CEDS%202009%20web%20version.pdf. According
to the CEDS the regional goals and objectives are the following:
• Community Development-Assess and develop local resources
• Economic Development-Job creation and retention
• Education/Information/Communication-High quality information available to all
• Community Services/Infrastructure-Obtain or upgrade services and infrastructure
• Energy-Maintain and develop a diverse array of energy sources
• Transportation -Maintain and develop all modes of transportation
• Small Business Support & Development -Identify assets and mobilize resources
• Organizational Quality-Operate the organization effectively and efficiently
Through the Consolidated Plan the City intends to construct infrastructure improvements including way
finding signs, sidewalks, stormwater, bridge improvements, etc. In addition the new funding category of
Public Assistance the related services may include job training and education to
LMI individuals/households.
Discussion
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 66
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
The Mid-MO Regional Planning Commission CEDS states that at the moment it appears that life in the
Mid-Missouri region has changed, in the general direction of the national trends, albeit the shift is not as
dramatic as that in other parts of the nation or world. Certainly the economy and community priorities
are being impacted by the change in political climate and the recent global economic downturn. It
remains to be seen just exactly when, where, and how much these impacts will be manifest in the
region. In fact it is clear that there will need to be a high priority placed on the task of keeping a close
watch on incoming information about changing conditions, in at least the near future. When evaluating
the economic conditions in the region, several aspects or approaches are of concern to the citizens of
the area and have been considered:
• Anticipating, stopping, or dealing with loss.
• The direction of movement-analyzing internal and external forces impelling the economy of
the region.
• Growth in terms of the number of people employed in income producing pursuits
• Growth in terms of the value of the industry in regard to the amount of wages, income, or
wealth that is realized.
• Preparation or foundation work needed to be prepared to seize opportunity.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
67
MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated?
(include a definition of "concentration 11
)
The Old Town area was designated by the City Council in 2007 as the core part of the City in need of
revitalization and redevelopment. This area has been identified as having the highest concentration of
low-and moderate-income residents, deteriorated/ inaccessible public improvements, and below
standard, older housing stock. The demographic analysis shows a correlation between low and
moderate-income households and minority populations.
For this purpose the definition of concentration is defined as the Old Town area which is bounded by
Industrial to Dix Road, Southwest Blvd to Ellis Blvd, Moreau Drive to Clark Ave to Riverside
Ave or Census Tract 101, 102, 105 and 106.
Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income
families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")
In 2012 the City completed an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing. According to the report the City
has a concentration of affordable rental housing in certain neighborhoods with higher minority and low
income populations. Currently, affordable rental housing is being developed mainly by the Housing
Authority of Jefferson City either as public housing or as a partner in low income housing tax credits
developments.
Concentration for this purpose is a difference of 10% or more between each racial or ethnic classes.
What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods?
Increased concentrations of racial or ethnic populations are frequently not due to steering by real estate
or lending agents, but rather to the preferences of those populations to live in areas with family, friends,
and other similar support systems within their neighborhood. It is important to note, particularly when
viewing the concentration of Black/ African Americans within Jefferson City, that Census Tract 105.3 also
contains Lincoln University of Missouri, a historically black, 1890 land-grant, public, comprehensive
institution.
Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods?
There are many community assets available within the Old Town area. Lincoln University was founded
in 1866 by the 62nd and 65th Colored Infantries for the special benefit of freed African Americans.
Lincoln University today offers 50 undergraduate studies; master degree programs in education,
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
68
business and social sciences; has 50 registered organizations including fraternities, academic and
professional affliations.
The Boys and Girls Club of the Capital City was founded December 7, 1995, by a group of concerned
parents and business/community individuals as an independent, not for-profit agency. In May 2004, the
Club was accepted as a United Way, full member agency. The Club has a membership of close to 400
boys and girls. Boys & Girls Club recently opened ''The Club Teen Center~~ at 1306 Edmonds Street. This
drop-in teen center is open to any middle or high school student in Jefferson City after school. The Teen
Center offers tutoring, gaming, recreation and hot dinner are available at no cost to any teen in the
community.
Common Ground Community Building is a partnership between First United Methodist Church and
other local congregations. Their mission is to love and serve our neighbor. They provide financial
assistance through a small benevolence ministry, house a Fair Trade Market, maintain a community
garden and provide other educational and outreach services to the community around Jefferson City.
Central Missouri Community Action Agency offers array of services from Early Head Start, Head Start,
financial education, employment training, family support, weatherization, fathers first, foster
grandparents, etc. According to their website, community action supports low income families, and is
the only national network dedicated to ending poverty.
Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas?
The City of Jefferson offers Neighborhood Reinvestment Act programs within the 11 0ld Townn area.
These programs include property tax abatement upt to 5 years for purchasing a single family house
within the Old Town Area. A Down Payment Assistance up to $5,000 for purchasing a house that had
been previously been used other than owner occupied/vacant within the previous 12 months.
Commerical facade tax abatement program assist commerical owners with exterior repairs for
structures constructed prior to 1951. Mixed Used Adaptive Reuse program encourages the reuse of
vacant buildings which have outlived their original purpose back into productive commercial use while
retaining their historic features.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
69
Strategic Plan
SP-DS Overview
Strategic Plan Overview
This section contains the Strategic Plan for Housing and Community Development that will guide the City
of Jefferson's allocation of Community Development Block Grant funding during the 2014-2018 planning
period.
The City of Jefferson goals for the 2014-2018 period focus on a number of identified high priority needs,
and has targeted available resources toward several specific goals that are designed to address those
needs. These needs include housing assistance for low income persons, the elderly, homeless and
special needs persons, public improvements and facilities for low and moderate income persons.
These goals primarily focus on helping residents maintain and improve their quality of life in the City of
Jefferson. To this end, City of Jefferson will continue to build on successful projects and programs that
meet the needs of low and moderate income residents. Projects selected for funding in the five year
period will be managed as efficiently as possible in order to address a wide range of issues that exist in
the City of Jefferson.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
70
SP-10 Geographic Priorities-91.215 (a)(1)
Geographic Area
1 Area Name: Citywide
Area Type: Local Target area
Other Target Area Description:
HUD Approval Date:
% of Low/ Mod:
Revital Type: Other
Other Revital Description: public
improvements
Identify the neighborhood boundaries for this target area.
Include specific housing and commercial characteristics of this target area.
How did your consultation and citizen participation process help you to
identify this neighborhood as a target area?
Identify the needs in this target area.
What are the opportunities for improvement in this target area?
Are there barriers to improvement in this target area?
Table 47-Geographic Priority Areas
General Allocation Priorities
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA
for HOPWA)
All CDBG funds will be used within the City limits of Jefferson City which includes Old Town.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506·0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
71
SP-25 Priority Needs-91.215{a)(2)
Priority Needs
1 Priority Need Affordable Housing
Name
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Middle
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Rural
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally Ill
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV I AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV I AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Citywide
Areas
Affected
Associated Provide safe, decent affordable housing
Goals Increase Economic Opportunities
Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
72
Description Provide rehabilitation assistance to homeowners upto $5,000 for code deficiencies,
energy efficiency, assessibility and emergency repairs (i.e. wastewater). In addition
provide a Down Payment Assistance Program for direct financial assistance wJth
down payment and/or closing costs to low-moderate households towards a
purchase of a single-family residence within city limits.
Basis for The Needs Assessment Survey was conducted as part of the Consolidated Planning
Relative Process identified housing residential rehab, energy efficiency improvements and
Priority homeownership assistance as high needs with accessibility improvements as a
medium need.
2 Priority Need Public Infrastructure & Facility Improvements
Name
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Middle
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Rural
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally Ill
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Non-housing Community Development
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 73
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Geographic Citywide
Areas
Affected
Associated Increase Economic Opportunities
Goals Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods
Description Infrastructure improvements including but not limited to sidewalks, streets, water
and sewer replacement.
Accessibility to transportation in order to provide the ability to construct bus stop
shelters, add new or increase services and/or bus passes to low-moderate
income households. In addition, "way finding" signage may be included as part of
the MODOT lafayette/US 50 overpass project.
Sidewalks -The Jefferson City Council passed ordinance 14637 for a Sidwalk Master
Plan. lack of sidewalks and uneven pavement for existing structures can make it
difficult for a person to navigate especially in a wheelchair or with a walking aid. As
part of the plan areas were identified as high priorities for the pedestrian traffic to
be "linked" to areas of business, shopping, transportation, etc.
Stormwater, water & sewer-Existing infrasture in areas of town that are lMI by
census date back to early 1900s. These infrastructures may be undersized and
failing due to materials. CDBG funds may be utlilized to assist with replacement
with adequate size and materials which will aid in suitable living conditions.
Non-profits who operate public facilities as part of their services may need
assistance with rehabilitation costs and ADA accessibility improvements due to age
of building structure. In addition City may need assistance with ADA Improvements
to facilities in which general business is conducted.
Basis for The Needs Assessment Survey conducted as part of the Consolidated Planning
Relative Process identified sidewalk improvements as a high need and accessibility
Priority improvemeents as a medium need.
3 Priority Need Supportive Services for low Income & Special Needs
Name
Priority Level High
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 74
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Middle
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally Ill
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV I AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Non-housing Community Development
Geographic Citywide
Areas
Affected
Associated Increase Economic Opportunities
Goals Promote Self-Sufficiency Through Service Provision
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 75
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Description Upto 15% of CDBG annual funding may be used towards public assistance. For this
purpose, the City of Jefferson will provide funding to local non-profit entities
serving the Jefferson City limits. Activities related to public services include but not
limited to:
• basic social services to the homeless and low-to-moderate income persons;
• food and nutrition services for low-to-moderate income persons;
• domestic violence prevention and counseling services;
• job training and employment services for Jow-to-moderat income persons;
• health care and substance abuse services for low-to-moderate income
persons;
• childcare for low-to-moderate income persons;
• services for senior citizens (62 and over exclusively);
• services for disabled persons;
• services for homeless person;
• education programs for low-to-moderate income persons;
• crime prevention and dispute resolution programs; and
• fair housing counseling .
CDBG funds may be used to pay for labor, supplies and materials as well to operate
and/or maintain the portion of a facility in which the public service is located. This
includes the lease of a facility, equipment, and other property needed for the public
service.
To utilize CDBG funds for a public service, the service must be either a) a new
service or b) a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service which has
been provided in the 12 months preceding the submission of the Consolidated Plan.
Basis for As part of the Consolidated Plan process the first public hearing produced
Relative comments in support of funding for homeless shelters. In addition, the Needs
Priority Assessment Survey identified that fair housing, services to veterans, domestic
violence services, substance abuse services, homeless shelters/services,
neglected/abused children center and services, health services, and mental health
services as a high need for the City.
4 Priority Need Removal of Slum and Blight
Name
Priority Level Low
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 76
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Population Extremely low
low
Moderate
Middle
large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Rural
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally Ill
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV I AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Citywide
Areas
Affected
Associated Increase Economic Opportunities
Goals Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods
Description Program will assist with the removal of slum and blight properties within the City
limits. Non-profits are eligible to apply for funds to assist with removal of
properties in order to reconstruct affordable housing or remove structures from the
floodplain. The City may utilize funds to remove slum and blight as long as
structures have been vacant for 12 months or more.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 77
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Basis for Local non-profit organizations such as Habitat provide assistance to low-moderate
Relative income households to realize their dreams of homeownership. This program will
Priority assist with that process to provide safe affordable homes to LMI households.
In addition, the City currently has an abandoned building registration list with
approximately 118 buildings already identified. If any of these buildings pose a
significant risk to the public for health and safety reasons (i.e. fire cause burned out
shell) funds could be used to arrest the effects.
Table 48-Priority Needs Summary
Narrative (Optional)
Priority needs were identified by either master plans passed by council ordinance or by the Needs
Assessment survey. The survey was conducted as part of the Consolidated Planning process. Citizens
were able to access the survey through survey monkey from June 10, 2013 through July 31, 2013.
Approximately 78 surveys were completed by citizens as well as businesses who conduct services within
the City limits. The survey covered areas of housing, special needs services, community facilities,
neighborhood services, infrastructure, and business & jobs.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 78
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions-91.215 (b)
Influence of Market Conditions
Affordable Market Characteristics that will influence
Housing Type the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based As part of the City's application process for non-profits, TBRA may be a service
Rental Assistance provided if it is considered a new or quantifiable increase of existing service. All is
(TBRA) subject to 15% CDBG funding cap.
TBRA for Non-As part of the City's application process for non-profits, TBRA for Non-Homeless
Homeless Special Special Needs may be a service provided if it is considered a new or quantifiable
Needs increase of existing service. All is subject to 15% CDBG funding cap.
New Unit City of Jefferson does not utilize CDBG funds for new unit production. The
Production Missouri Housing Development Commission (MHDC) administers programs such
as the Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program, MHDC
Fund Balance and HOME Rental Housing Production Programs; Affordable
Housing Assistance Tax Credit Program, Home Repair Opportunity (HeRO)
Program and the Missouri Housing Trust Fund (MHTF) Program.
Rehabilitation City of Jefferson utilizes CDBG funds for assistance with rehabilitation. The
homeowner support programs assist homeowners upto $5,000 with assistance
with accessibility, energy efficiency, code deficiencies, and emergency home
repairs. In addition public facilities may be assisted with rehabilitation costs for
ADA, retrofitting, etc.
Acquisition, City of Jefferson does not utilize CDBG funds for acquisition, including
including preservation. We strive to meet the needs of our residents, and if it is determined
preservation that CDBG Funds could be better utilized in this category, we will explore the
feasibility of doing so.
Table 49 -Influence of Market Conditions
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 79
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-35 Anticipated Resources-91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
Anticipated Resources
Program Source of Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Description
Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount
Allocation: Income:$ Resources: $ Available
$ $ Reminder
ofConPian
$
CDBG public-Acquisition
federal Admin and Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public Improvements
Public Services 233,794 15,000 0 248,794 0
Table 50-Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how
matching requirements will be satisfied
Jefferson City's CDBG allocation will complement a number of other federal resources, as well as state and local resources. The primary
resources are: 1) The city's Neighborhood Reinvestment Act programs, which is used with in the Old Town area neighborhoods; 2) HUD's
Neighborhood Stablization Program (NSP); 3) State CDBG funded Missouri State Penitentiary demolition and redevelopment project; 4) State
CDBG funded Mulberry Street Flood Buyout; and 5) MODOT funded Lafayette Street I US SO Interchange project.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 80
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs
identified in the plan
Not applicable at this time.
Discussion
Please see the above narrative.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 81
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure-91.215(k)
Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan
including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions.
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Role Geographic Area Served
Type
Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless special
needs
Planning
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Public Housing PHA Public Housing
Authority
Table 51 -Institutional Delivery Structure
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
The activities that will be carried out in the consolidated plan will primarily be completed by the City of
Jefferson. Activities related to public housing will be completed by the Jefferson City Housing Authority.
Supportive Services for Low Income & Special Needs will be completed by local non-profits, yet
unknown, and will be determined through Request for Proposal or other competitive processes. Agency
partners work well with the City and with each other, and there are not any identified gaps to the
delivery system.
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream
services
Homelessness Prevention Available in the Targeted to Targeted to People
Services Community Homeless with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/ Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance X X
Mortgage Assistance X X
Rental Assistance X X X
Utilities Assistance X X X
Street Outreach Services
law Enforcement X X X
Mobile Clinics
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 82
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Street Outreach Services
Other Street Outreach Services X X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X
Child Care X X X
Education X X X
Employment and Employment
Training X X X
Healthcare X X X
HIV/AIDS X X X
Life Skills X X X
Mental Health Counseling X X X
Transportation X X X
Other
Table 52 -Homeless Prevention Services Summary
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed
above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and
families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
The delivery of listed services meets the needs of the homeless individuals and families when they are
referred to providers who offer the services. In instances where the homeless are identified through
outreach, interaction includes information on services. Outreach workers may provide referral services
to other agencies to meet the needs of their clients. The Governor's Committee to End Homeless has
provided guidance of discharge planning options as no person should be discharged into homeless ness.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population
and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed
above
As previously noted, agency partners in Jefferson City work well together to meet the needs of the
residents. Special needs populations and the homeless are provided numerous services and have access
to many programs, which are listed elsewhere in this consolidated plan. A weakness to the continuum of
services may be in the identification of new service or housing providers in the area, but the discussion
between agencies at the Continuum of Care or Governor's Committee to End Homeless ness meetings
attempts to identify and list these resources regularly.
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and
service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
83
Priority needs in the plan are addressed by the entities listed i~ the table above. Services and programs
that help to meet these and other needs are also provided by many local agencies. Gaps in providing
programs or services that meet the priority needs will be evaluated on an annual basis.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
84
SP-45 Goals Summary-91.21S(a)(4)
Goals Summary Information
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
1 Provide safe1 decent 2014 2018 Affordable Citywide Affordable Housing CDBG: Homeowner Housing
affordable housing Housing $1801000 Rehabilitated:
Public Housing 30 Household Housing Unit
Homeless
Non-Homeless Direct Financial Assistance to
Special Needs Home buyers:
15 Households Assisted
2 Preserve and Improve 2014 2018 Affordable Citywide Affordable Housing CDBG: Public Facility or Infrastructure
Area Neighborhoods Housing Public Infrastructure $2001000 Activities other than
Non-Homeless & Facility Low/Moderate Income
Special Needs Improvements Housing Benefit:
Non-Housing Removal of Slum and 2000 Persons Assisted
Community Blight
Development Homeowner Housing
Rehabilitated:
30 Household Housing Unit
Buildings Demolished:
10 Buildings
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 85
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
3 Promote Self-2014 2018 Homeless Citywide Supportive Services CDBG: Public service activities other
Sufficiency Through Non-Homeless for Low Income & $175,000 than Low/Moderate Income
Service Provision Special Needs Special Needs Housing Benefit:
100 Persons Assisted
Homelessness Prevention:
100 Persons Assisted
Jobs created/retained:
25 Jobs
4 Increase Economic 2014 2018 Affordable Citywide Affordable Housing CDBG: Public Facility or Infrastructure
Opportunities Housing Public Infrastructure $25,000 Activities other than
Homeless & Facility Low/Moderate Income
Non-Homeless Improvements Housing Benefit:
Special Needs Supportive Services 2000 Persons Assisted
Non-Housing for Low Income &
Community Special Needs Homeowner Housing
Development Removal of Slum and Rehabilitated:
Blight 30 Household Housing Unit
Buildings Demolished:
10 Buildings
Table 53-Goals Summary
Goal Descriptions
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 86
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
1 Goal Name Provide safe, decent affordable housing
Goal Provide assistance to low to moderate income households with the ability to afford decent housing.
Description
2 Goal Name Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods
Goal Funding and projects will focus on preserving and improving area neighborhoods that are of at least 51% low to moderate
Description income.
3 Goal Name Promote Self-Sufficiency Through Service Provision
Goal Provide upto 15% of the City's annual CDBG funding for public assistance. The service must be either a new service; or a
Description quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service which has been provided in the 12 months preceding the submission
of the Consolidated Plan.
4 Goal Name Increase Economic Opportunities
Goal Increase economic opportunities, especially for minority and women owned businesses, the ability to bid on projects funded
Description by CDBG. Projects may include but not limited to public improvements, rehabilitation, etc.
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide
affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
The City of Jefferson will assist extremely low-income, low-income and moderate income families who meet the existing HUD's income limits
with programs such as down payment assistance and rehab programs for homeowners. It is estimated that during the five year consolidated
plan {2014-2018) that 55 low-moderate households will be assisted with these programs.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 87
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement-91.215(c)
Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary
Compliance Agreement)
There is no Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement, and the Jefferson City Housing Authority has
always complied with the necessity of providing above the minimum number of accessible units in all
developments.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvements
All residents are notified via direct mail of any and all public hearings required for any proposed activity
as required by HUD for consultation with tenants, as well as other matters affecting their tenancy.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902?
No
Plan to remove the 'troubled' designation
Not applicable.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 88
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing-91.21S(h)
Barriers to Affordable Housing
There are no identified public policies that negatively impact affordable housing and residential
investment. The current Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing for City of Jefferson found a number of
local barriers. Barriers included 1) lack of adequate funding allocated for fair housing enforcement and
outreach activities; 2) lack of fair housing awareness; inadequate information and awareness of City's
housing programs; 3) lack of fair housing testing to determine where fair housing discrimination is taking
place; 4) concentration of affordable rental housing in certain neighborhoods with higher minority and
l.ow income populations; 5) need for ADA education and the lack of availability of housing for persons
with disabilities; and 6) lack of specific and comprehensive planning efforts around affirmatively
furthering fair housing in the City of Jefferson. Plan goals and projects will attempt to address these
barriers. An example of such a project may include housing rehabilitation, where the scope of work may
address the accessibility of a unit.
Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing
The City plans to continue the homeowner support programs. These programs assist homeowners
with rehabilitation upto $5,000 in terms of accessibility, energy efficiency and/or code violations. By
providing the means to complete appropriate rehab may help a homeowner stay within their home.
In addition, the City will also continue the down payment assistance program. This program funds goes
towards closing costs or down payment for purchase of a house. As requirement of the program the
applicant will be required to attend a first time home buyers course. The course will cover topics such
as budgeting, PM I, maintenance, etc.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
89
SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards-91.215(i)
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards
The City of Jefferson has a Lead Based Paint Policy and Procedures for the Homeowner Support
program.
1) Applicants identify the age of the structure at the time of application and is verified by GIS data.
2) If structure is built before 1978 and there is a potential to disturbing painted areas the proposed
project area will be tested for lead based paint. The Homeowner receives a copy of the test results.
3) Homeowner receives lead based paint information via 11 Protect Your Family From Lead In Your
Home 11
•
4) Based on the testing results Contractors shall be notified the requirement of lead hazard reduction
work and protective measures to be followed during construction.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
For all structures constructed prior to 1978, all work performed on areas that potentially contain lead
based paint shall be tested for lead based paint. If lead based paint is p~sitively identified if expending
$5,000 or less the disturbed surfaces shall be repaired and safe work practices be incorporated into the
project.
By completing these actions may assist in reducing lead poisoning and hazards.
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
All of the information listed above is located within the Policy and Procedures manuals and/or must be
addressed in applications for funding. Tier II environmental reviews will identify whether or not there is
potential for lead based paint hazards.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 90
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy-91.215(j}
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families
There are many antipoverty programs offered by local agencies in Jefferson City area. The antipoverty
goals and strategies are to help individuals and families rise above the poverty level, become self-
sufficient, and eliminate barriers to success. To achieve this goal, the City plans to provide up to 15% of
CDBG funds to be allocated for public assistance. local non-profit organizations may be able to apply for
funds for new services or quantifiable increase to existing services. Services may include education, job
training, TBRA, etc. This new funding opportunity paired with other services local non-profits provide
may assist in reducing the number of poverty-level families.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this
affordable housing plan
By providing public assistance funding to non profits may aid in providing affordable housing by means of
TBRA, job training, education.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 91
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
SP-80 Monitoring-91.230
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities
carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with
"\
requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the
comprehensive planning requirements
The Redevelopment and Grants staff shall monitor all Subrecipients to ensure program compliance. Staff
will utilize both "desk monitoring" and "internal/on-site" monitoring to assess the quality of program
performance over the duration of the agreement or contract.
Monitoring of Subrecipients shall concentrate on program, financial and regulatory performance of the
Subrecipients. In conducting a monitoring review, program staff will primarily rely on information
obtained from the subrecipient's performance reports, records, audits, allowed costs, review of financial
reports, eligibility and number of beneficiaries served, compliance with federal regulations and City
program requirements. Staff may also consider relevant information pertaining to a recipient's
performance gained from other sources including litigation, citizen comments and other information
provided by or concerning the subrecipient.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 92
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
AP-15 Expected Resources-91.220(c)(1,2}
Introduction
Anticipated Resources
Program Source of Uses of Funds
Funds
CDBG public-Acquisition
federal Admin and Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public Improvements
Public Services
Expected Resources
Expected Amount Available Year 1
Annual Program Prior Year
Allocation: Income:$ Resources:
$ $
233,794 15,000 0
Table 54-Expected Resources-Priority Table
Expected Narrative Description
Total: Amount
$ Available
Reminder
ofConPian
$
248,794 0
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how
matching requirements will be satisfied
<p align=11 LEFT">Jefferson City's CDBG allocation will complement a number of other federal resources, as well as state and local resources. The
primary resources are: 1) The city's Neighborhood Reinvestment Act programs, which is used with in the Old Town area neighborhoods;
2) HUD's Neighborhood Stablization Program (NSP); 3) State CDBG funded Missouri State Penitentiary demolition and redevelopment project; 4)
State CDBG funded Mulberry Street Flood Buyout; and 5) MODOT funded Lafayette Street I US 50 Interchange project. </p>
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 93
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that
may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
Not applicable at this time.
Discussion
Please see the above narrative.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 94
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Annual Goals and Objectives
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives
Goals Summary Information
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
1 Provide safe, decent 2014 2018 Affordable Citywide Affordable Housing CDBG: Homeowner Housing
affordable housing Housing $50,000 Rehabilitated: 10 Household
Public Housing Housing Unit
Homeless
Non-Homeless
Special Needs
2 Increase Economic 2014 2018 Affordable Citywide CDBG: Homeowner Housing Added: 0
Opportunities Housing $15,000 Household Housing Unit
Homeless Direct Financial Assistance to
Non-Homeless Homebuyers: 3 Households
Special Needs Assisted
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 95
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
3 Promote Self-2014 2018 Homeless Citywide Supportive Services CDBG: Public service activities other
Sufficiency Through Non-Homeless for Low Income & $35,000 than Low/Moderate Income
Service Provision Special Needs Special Needs Housing Benefit: 10 Persons
Assisted
Tenant-based rental assistance I
Rapid Rehousing: 5 Ho~seholds
Assisted
Homelessness Prevention: 10
Persons Assisted
5 Preserve and Improve 2014 2018 Affordable Citywide Removal of Slum CDBG: Buildings Demolished: 3
Area Neighborhoods Housing and Blight $15,000 Buildings
Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Table 55-Goals Summary
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Provide safe, decent affordable housing
Goal Homeowner programs to assist LMI households with rehab improvements to correct code deficiencies, increase energy
Description efficiency, ADA assessibility, and emergency repairs (i.e. sewer repair). Programs will provide $5,000 assistance
to homeowners. For residential structures built prior to 1978 will require lead based paint testing in· areas of proposed
work.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 96
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
2 Goal Name Increase Economic Opportunities
Goal Provide down payment/dosing cost assistance up to $5,000 to low-moderate income households for purchase of a single-
Description family residential house. If structure was· constructed prior to 1978, a visual inspection will be required for lead based paint
hazards. Additional $500 may be available to the homebuyer if pealing paint are identified to mitigate the hazard. LMI
applicant will be required to attend a first time homebuyers course and obtain a certificate.
3 Goal Name Promote Self-Sufficiency Through Service Provision
Goal The City of Jefferson will provide an opportunity to local non-profits who have their 501(c)(3) status to provide assistance to
Description low-moderate income households with upto 15% of the allocated CDBG funds. The Public Assistance category eligible
activities will include, but not limited to: employment services, crime prevention and public safety, child care, health services,
substance abuse services, fair housing counseling, education programs, energy conservation, services for senior citizens,
and services for homeless persons.
To utilize CDBG funds for a public service, the service must be either 1) a new service or 2) a quantifiable increase in the level
of an existing service which has been provided in the 12 months preceding the submission of the Consolidated Plan Annual
Action Plan to HUD.
5 Goal Name Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods
Goal Provide assistance with removal of slum and blight.
Description
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 97
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
AP-35 Projects -91.220( d)
Introduction
Projects
The following projects are proposed for the City's 2014 program year.
Projects
# Project Name
1 CDBG Planning and Administration
2 Housing Rehabilitation
3 Down Payment Assistance
4 Supportive Services
5 Public Facility & Improvements
6 Demolition Assistance
Table 56 -Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved
needs
The allocation of funds is closely aligned with the top housing and community development
needs identified in the needs assessment, housing market analysis and contributed by
stakeholders and citizens who participated in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The
primary obstacle to addressing underserved needs is lack of funds. The cost of needed
improvements to the city's sidewalks, for example, far exceeds the city's five year allocation of
HUD block grant funds. The city also faces budgetary constraints associated with the economic
downturn.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
98
AP-38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information
Table 57-Project Summary
~~~ct~unl~~-~~fo~~~~~-------r---------------------------------------,---------------------~--------
No. ! Project 1 Goals Supported Geographic Areas Needs Addressed Funding --" -r-----------------------------------, --------------------
1 Provide safe, decent affordable housing , :Affordable Housing ;
: CDBG Planning and Administration jlncreas.!._~onof!liC Opportunities 'Citywide -Local Target area 1 Public I~frastructure & Facility Improvements i CDBG : S46 754
1 Promote Self-Sufficiency Thr.QYQh Service Provision ' : Supportive Services for Low Income & SQ~dal N~~ds ! '
... ··j :i=~~~:~:-::~:r;~~:~~-~~:~=~~~~=-----------------------·--------------------------____ :_~~~~val of Slum and Blight
1 1
j Description i ·------------·------···--------·-· ·····----·--------·------------·----------··--·-·---·--·---------· ··--·-----------------------
1 ' Planned Activities
! Housing Rehabilitation
l P~~~jd;·~f~~-d;~;;rt~d~bi;·-hou~------~--------··-----··----------··------···-----··----------·--------------·-------·-·:---------------
i Increase Economic Opportunities ! Citywide • Local Target area :Affordable Housing i CDBG : SSO,OOO
I Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods !
·······-·r··-·-·---·---·--·--·-----------·--·-·--·-·------·-----·----------···------------·-·-·--·-------·--·--···-----··-----·-·-·-·-·-·-·--·-·---·-·-·-··----··--··--······-····-···---··--··------·---·-·-·-·--------·-·--··-
1 Provide assistance to low to moderate income households up to $5,000 for rehab/repair for code deficiencies, energy efficiency, ADA assessibility, and
~-~!:'1.!~~~~~--~-~E~!~~: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _ ! Description . ~---------~ ·----···-~---····~---·-----
: Planned Activities
l ... ~ .
. ~~~~~---1~~~~~-J~~~~~l~~~-------~~~
! Description j Provide direct financial assistance for low to moderate income households up to $5,000 for the purchase of a single-family residence .
.... . ... !_Piann~d-A~tl~lti;~-~---·· .. -------·--~~-· ... J-.-~~.:·~=~=~~=~~~~=--~---------------------.. -... -...... =~====~~~:.:.=····===-~~~=~ .. :.:·------------~~~-~.:~~~=:.·.· .. :=.~=-·-----------------·---------~----~=-~~=~----
5
1 Preserve and Improve Area Neighborhoods i ! Removal of Slum and Blight 1 '
Description ! ·.;~~j"~ct~ ~ili~~;l~ti~-p~~~dl~g--i~-p~;;~;;~~t~--t~p~b-ii~-~-~-f~~-~t~~ct~;~~-~~-df-~~-f;~illti~~:····--·············· ... --··-··········· ................................................................................... ···---·················· -·-········-···-
l
i Demolition Assistance
6 f-----------! Description
t-~·-·····"' i Planned Activities
.. i .•...••..•..• ··················~-~-·~---~-·-~-~-~--~·~~--~-=~-~=~-~~~~-=-~~-~~-~~~-=--~~-~==~~~-~~~----·~~-=~=~~~~--~-~--~·=~~-~---··--~~-~=·--·-······ -·-·---····----------··---··--·-·-···-·····-·················-······ .. ·-······················-----~ ~!~~~i::~.:-:;~:::;:::1 :::~.~~;~;~::"~:~:~.--·-······················----·······r~==:~::.:::
•• •• ••• ''"'' ••••••••• ~ • ••••• ••••• •-••••-••••·•••••••••••••••••••.,••••••••••••••.--•••·•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-••••-••••-••••·~·•••••• .. ••••,."'••-•••••••~••~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,.-•••-•••·••.,• ... ·•••••-·•··~·~••••·•-·~·-"''"''""''""''""'''"''"'''''''"'""''"''"''-''"'"'''''"~"'"''""''"'" ,,..,,.,,.,,,.,,.,,,.,...,,,,,, • ,.,,,.,,.,.,, .. ,,,, .. ,. .. ,.,.,.,,,,..,~,,,
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 99
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
AP-50 Geographic Distribution-91.220{f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and
minority concentration) where assistance will be directed
The City has several census tracts that are identified as to having 51% Low-Moderate Income
households. These census tracts are 105, 106 and 207. Public improvements will be concentrated within
these census tracts. By the nature of the homeowner support programs, down payment assistance, and
public assistance funding will directly go to LMI households as they all require verification of income for
the assistance. lfs anticipated that funding for slum and blight removal will assist local non-profits with
reconstruction low income housing.
Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 100
Table 58-Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically
The City's priorites for CDBG funding are will be directed to LMI households not a specific census tract.
Discussion
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 100
OMB Control No: 2506-()117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Affordable Housing
AP-55 Affordable Housing-91.220(g)
Introduction
Beginning with 2014 the City will provide the opportunity for non-profits to apply for funding from the
public assistance category. It is unknown at this time what areas the public assistance will fund
therefore the one year goals for the number of househoulds to be supported is only an estimate.
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported
Homeless 10
Non-Homeless
Specia 1-N eeds
Total
13
3
26
Table 59 -One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement
One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through
Rental Assistance 0
The Production of New Units 0
Rehab of Existing Units 10
Acquisition of Existing Units 3
Total 13
Table 60 -One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type
Discussion
Affordable housing may be met through multiple programs the City will be offering beginning
2014. Those programs include homeowner support programs, down payment assistance, and public
assistance. Homeowner support program assist LMI homeowners with rehab/repairs to correct code
deficiencies, increase energy efficiency, ADA assessibility and emergency repairs up to $5,000. The
down payment assistance program will assist LMI households with up to $5,000 to defray the cost of
down payment/dosing costs. Finally, the public assistance category will be available to non-profits to
provide a new service or a quantifiable increase to an existing service which may or may not include
employment services, health services, fair housing counseling, education programs, services for senior
citizens, services for homeless persons, etc.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 101
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
AP-60 Public Housing-91.220(h)
Introduction
The JCHA operates 317 units of public housing and administers the Section 8 Housing Voucher program
for the Jefferson City area. A Section 8 voucher assists eligible families pay the rent for apartments
owned by private landlords. The JCHA inspects Section 8 properties prior to move-in and on a yearly
basis to ensure that apartments comply with HUD standards for safety, size and accessibility. The JCHA
keeps a list of Section 8 Landlords on its website. The Housing Authority also offers several affordable
senior housing developments, some with units accessible for persons with disabilities.
Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing
The goal of the Public Housing Authority is to provide improved living conditions for very low and low
income families while maintaining their rent payments at an affordable level. To operate a socially and
financially sound public housing agency that provides decent, safe and sanitary housing within a drug
free, suitable living environment for tenants and their families. To avoid concentration of economically
and socially deprived families in any one or all of the PHA's public housing developments.
The Authority continues to offer low income families affordable housing. It works closely with local
police to keep the neighborhoods drug free and to avoid crime in the area. The Authority tries to attract
a variety of families of various socio-economic backgrounds to each of its public housing developments.
Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and
participate in homeownership
Brochures for the down payment assistance program will be available at the Housing Authority. The
program provides assistance up to $5,000 towards the down payment/closing costs associated with
purchasing a residential home. The program requires completion of a first time home buyers course and
obtain a certificate of completion.
If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be
provided or other assistance
Not applicable according to the Housing Authority.
Discussion
The City does not manage the local public housing authority. The Housing Authority is comprised of a
board in which the Mayor does delegate member(s) to.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
102
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing-91.2200}
Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve
as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning
ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the
return on residential investment
There are two planned zoning code amendments that will affect housing afford ability in Old
Town/central city:
1. A reduction (perhaps elimination of the requirement in some cases) in off street parking
requirements. Managing parking effectively can increase property values, enhance business
opportunities, mitigate developer impacts, provide opportunities for active and sustainable
transportation and improve traffic circulation.
2. Allowing live-work units in commercial zoned areas. Benefits of including 11 mixed-use 11 zoning may
include the following:
• greater housing variety and density
• reduced distances between housing, workplaces, retail businesses, and other destinations
• more compact development
• stronger neighborhood character
• pedestrian and bicycle-friendly environments
In addition the adoption of the 11 new 11 Southside Plan includes preservation of existing housing rather
than demolition and redevelopment.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
103
AP-85 Other Actions-91.220(k)
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs
New to this Consolidated Plan is the inclusion of the Public Assistance Category. This will allow for non-
profit entities to apply for funds up to 15% of the City's annual entitlement allocation for eligible
activities assisting low-moderate income households. Eligible Public Assistance activities according to
Section 105(a) of the Community Development Act include, but not limited to:
• Employment services (e.g. job training);
• Crime prevention and public safety;
• Child care;
• Health Services;
• Substance abuse services (e.g. counseling and treatment);
• Fair housing counseling;
• Education programs;
• Services for senior citizens; and
• Services for homeless persons.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing
The City currently has several programs within the Neighborhood Reinvestment Act (NRA) including
Residential Old Town Tax Reimbursement Program, Commerical Old Town Facade Tax Reimbursement
Program, Residential Old Town Down Payment Assistance and Mixed Use Adaptive Reuse Program.
These programs are locally funded and is intended to foster affordable housing and create
improvements within the Old Town sector of the City. The programs have been in place for several
years and so far the council continues to fund the programs.
In addition, the CDBG funded programs include homeowner asssistance in areas of code deficiencies,
energy efficiency upgrades, assessibility and emergency repairs. This program aids in maintaining
affordability and sustainability by keeping the homeowners within their homes by correcting code
deficiencies; increasing energy efficiency which potentially lower utility bills; completing ADA
assessibility retro-fits; and/or repairing emergency health and safety issues such as replacing the
wastewater connection.
The CDBG Down Payment Assistance Program may aid in a household obtaining homeowners hip
status. The program is designed for first time LMI home buyers (per HUD's definition) in purchasing a
residential house within the City limits. This program is different from the City funded NRA Down
Payment Assistance as the CDBG program does not have the requirements of purchasing a property
within the "Old Town" sector. By providing assistance with down payments or closing cost will aid in
providing decent housing that is affordable.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
104
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The CDBG Down Payment and Homeowner Assistance Programs require lead based paint inspections for
properties that were constructed prior to 1978.
The Down Payment Assistance Program requires a visual inspection prior to closing. If there are any
identified pealing paint or other lead based paint hazards positively identified through testing the buyer
could be entitled to an additional $500 in order to mitigate the lead based paint hazard.
As for the Homeowner Assistance programs any painted areas that will be disturbed with rehabilitation
will be tested for lead based paint. Any areas positively identified as having lead based paint the
contractors shall repair the surfaces disturbed and include safe work practic-es clearance.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families
New to this Consolidated Plan is the inclusion of the Public Assistance Category. This will allow for non-
profit entities to apply for funds up to 15% of the City's annual entitlement allocation for eligible
activities assisting low-moderate income households. Eligible Public Assistance activities according to
Section 105(a) of the Community Development Act include, but not limited to:
• Employment services (e.g. job training);
• Crime prevention and public safety;
• Child care;
• Health Services;
• Substance abuse services (e.g. counseling and treatment);
• Fair housing counseling;
• Education programs;
• Services for senior citizens; and
• Services for homeless persons.
By providing this category of funding may aid in reducing the number of poverty-level of families as non-
profits will have the ability to add a new service or have a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing
service.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The City partners with various local and state agencies such as the Unmet Needs Committee, Housing
Authority, Governor's Committee To End Homelessness, Balance of State Continuum of Care, State and
local departments. In addition, the City has an excellant relationship with the local chamber of
commerce and Mid-Mo Regional Planning Commission.
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 105
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
service agencies
The City plans to attend the Region Five Regional Housing Team Meeting (RHTM). These meetings are
held quarterly and is in collaboration with the Governor's Committee to End Homeless ness (GCEH),
Missouri Housing Development Commission (MHDC), the Homeless Missourians Information System
(HMIS), local Supportive Housing Programs and local resource agencies. The purpose of these meetings
is to establish a network of agencies to enhance the service delivery to homeless, disabled individuals
and families, and others seeking services for their current hardship and challenges in their lives. The
·meetings are comprised of two sessions: one focusing on housing and homeless ness issues and the
other session on using HMIS data for performance improvement.
In addition, the City will continue participation in the monthly Unmet Needs Committee meetings. The
Committee is comprised of various local agencies who provide updates of their existing programs and
needs. Each meeting also includes a speaker and information on services an agency provides. By
collaborating together often results in ideas, suggestions and a positive outcome.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY 106
OMB Control No: 2506-Q117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Program Specific Requirements
AP-90 Program Speeific Requirements-91.220(1)(1,2,4)
Introduction:
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the
Projects Table. The following identifies program interne that is available for use that is included in
projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next
program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108loan guarantees that will be used during the year to
0
address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not
been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit
persons of low and moderate income.Overall Benefit-A consecutive period of one,
two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70%
of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the
years covered that include this Annual Action Plan.
Consolidated Plan JEFFERSON CITY
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
0
70.00%
107
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Public Works and Planning Committee
FROM: Janice McMillan , AICP , Director
DATE: October 24, 2013
RE: PPS Monthly Reports
Please find attached reports for building permits and food service inspections for September
an d th t d t e year-o-a e .
I Summary of Building Permits Issued
Permit Type Sept Aug July June May Mar& Jan & YTD
2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 Apr 2013 F eb 2013
Nonresidential -New 3 3 2 0 0 1 2 11
Nonresidential-Additions, 10 14 8 10 9 20 25 96
Alterations
Residential -New 8 4 6 4 14 10 6 52
Residential -Alterations, 34 16 20 22 24 31 19 166
Additions
Demolitions -Nonresidential 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 4
Demoli tions -Residential 2 0 4 2 0 1 2 11
Total Building Permits* 57 38 40 38 48 64 55 340
*Does not mc/ude electncal, plumbmg or s1gn perm1ts 1s sued
Summary of Food Service Inspections
Violations
Period AI/ Inspections Food Service Retail Critical Noncritical
Sept2013 69 61 8 5 66
August 2013 74 70 4 11 82
July 2 013 68 61 7 13 62
June 2013 76 64 12 5 74
May 2013 67 55 12 6 74
Apr & Mar 2013 135 116 19 8 132
Jan & Feb 2013 108 80 28 14 186
Year-to-date 597 507 90 62 676
Building Permits
Permit Listing
Use r: astratman
Printed:
First Sort:
I 0/09/2013 -9 :21 AM
Penn it C lass
Second Sort: (None)
App li cat ion No From: To:
Permit No From: To:
Gen C Last Name From: To:
Lot No From: To:
Tax Lo t From: To:
Lot Zip Code From: To:
Cust No From: To:
Cust Las t Name From: To:
Permit C lass : RESIDENT IAL
Pennit Type: RDEMBLDG , RNEWBLDG
Permit Statu s: Activ e, Closed
AppNo Permit No Permit C lass Tax Lot
Permit :!XPC Lot No
001 1553 BPI3-0214 RE SIDENT IAL 1001120 00300 1(
RNEWBLDG 027044
001 1720 BP13-0277 RESIDENTIAL 1 003080003003(
RNEWBLDG 055687
001 1721 BP I3-0278 RESIDENT IAL I 0030 8000300 3(
RNEWBLDG 0556 89
001 1735 BP 13-0287 RE S IDENT IAL I 0020 90 003005(
RNEWBLDG 029295
001 1738 BP I3-0291 RESIDENTLAL 100420000200 I (
RNEWBLDG 03041 1
001 1752 DEM 13-00 14 RESIDENTIAL II 0307000100 I (
RDEMBLDG 053922
0011753 DEMI3-00 15 RESIDENT IAL 110307000100 1(
RDEMBLDG 036008
0011795 BPI3-0302 RESIDENT IAL 100623000 I 00 I (
RNEWBLDG 0558 64
BP-Pennit Li sting (10/09 /2013-9:2 1AM)
Appl ication Date From:
Is sue Date From: 09/01 /2013
Comp let ion Date From:
Expirati on Date From:
Print Date From:
To:
To: 09/30/2013
To:
To:
To:
CITY OF JEFFERSON
JOHN G. CHRISTY MUNICIPAL BUILDING
320 E McCarty St
Jefferson City, MO 65101-3193
Tmp CO Exp Date From : To:
Ge neral Contractor Name C ust No Customer Name Permit Status
Genera l Contractor Phone Lot Address Ba lance
SAME AS APPLICANT 047917 RHAD BAKER CONS T. LLC Active
1110 DULLEST JEF FERSON CITY $0.00
SAME AS APPLICANT 02 1676 SCHEPERLE, DALE Active
1001 EMILY LN JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
SAME AS APPLICANT 02 16 76 SCHE PERL E, DALE Act ive
1008 EM ILY LN JEFFERSO N CITY $0.00
SAME AS APPLICANT 0484 38 CLC DESIGN , LL C Act ive
36 14 TYLERS RUN CT J EFFERSON C ITY $0.0 0
SAME AS APPLICANT 042381 B & M BUILD ING SOLUTIC Active
3852 RJLEY CT JEFFERSON C ITY MO $0 .00
SAME AS APPLICANT 0252 86 HOUSfNG AU THORITY OF Active
406 WASH INGTON ST X J EFFERSON C ITY $0.00
SAME AS APPLICANT 025 28 6 HOUSfNG AUTHORITY OF Active
408 WASHfNGTON ST J EFFERSON C IT Y $0.00
SAME AS APPLICANT 023510 BRUNS CONSTRUCTION Acti ve
2 19 6 JUNE CT JEFFERSO N CITY $0 .00
Page 1
AppNo Permit No Permit Class Tax Lot General Contractor Name Cust No Customer Name Permit Status
Permit !lee Lot No General Contractor Phone Lot Address Balance
0011799 BPIJ-0305 RESIDENTIAL 1 006230002006{ SAME AS OWNER 020070 RYAN SCHRIMPF CONSTR Active
RNEWBLDG 033350 1942 SARATOGA BLVD JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011802 BP13-0308 RESIDENTIAL 11051600020021 SAME AS OWNER 015733 Kleindienst, James A & Angel Active
RNEWBLDG 055955 111 BUCHANAN ST JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
10 Records
BP-Pennit Listing (10/09/2013-9:21AM) Page2
Building Pennits
Pe rmit Listing
User: astratman
Printed:
Firs t Sort:
10/09/20 13-9:22AM
Permit C lass
Second Sort: (None)
App li cati on No From: To:
Permit No From : To:
Ge n C Las t Name from: To:
Lot No from: To:
Tax Lot From: To:
Lot Zip Code From: To:
C ust No From : To:
C ust La st Name f rom: To:
Pcm1it Class: RESIDENTIAL
Pem1it Type: RADDBLDG, RALTPLBG
Pe rmit S tatus: Acti ve, C losed
App No Permit No Permit Class Tax Lot
PermitTrpe Lot No
0011656 BPI3-0279 RES IDENTI A L I 00 I 020004005(
RADDBLDG 025658
0011723 BPI 3-028 1 RESIDENTlAL 0507350003006(
RADDBLDG 019459
001 1727 BP I 3-0283 RE S IDENTIA L II 04 170003 002(
RADDBLDG 040343
00 11 730 BP 13-0286 RES IDENTI A L I 006 13000200 I (
RADDB LDG 03 1527
00 11 73 1 P1 3-0296 RESIDENTIAL II 04 190004002(
RALTPLBG 042728
00 11734 Pl 3 -0299 RE S IDENT IA L I 00 Ill 0004006(
RALTPLBG 026283
0011 736 BPI 3-0289 RE S IDENTIA L I 00 I 0 I 000200 H
RADDBLDG 023904
App li cati on Date Fro m : To:
Issue Date From: 09/0 1/20 13 To: 09/30/20 13
Completion Date From: To:
Exp iration Date From: To:
Print Date From: To:
Tmp CO Exp Date From: To:
Gen eral Contractor Name C u s t No C us t omer Name
Genera l C ontractor Phone Lot Address
SAME AS OWNER 042322 KINCHE LOE, DUNCAN & l
2027 W MAIN ST JEFFERSON C ITY
SA ME AS OWNER 024253 FULLER, JUANITA
500 B ELAIR DR JEFfERSON CITY
SAME AS A PPLI CANT 0 22860 LUECKE N HO FF 13RO S. co ·
717 HOBBS TER JEFFE RSON C ITY
SAME AS A PPLI CANT 0228 14 BILL'S ROOFING
1407 SWIFTS II WY J Ef-FERSON C ITY
SAME AS APPLI CANT 023799 PLUMB MAG IC
1700 PAYNE DR JEf-FERSON CITY
SAME AS A PPLICANT 023807 HA ROLD G BUT ZER INC
2200 TOWER DR J EFFERSON CITY
SAME AS APPLI CANT 0393 8 1 DAVE MART IN CONSTRUC
CITY OF ]EFFERSON
JOHN G. CHRISTY MUNICIPAL BUILDING
320 E McCarty St
Jefferson City, MO 65101-3193
Permit Status
Ba lance
Active
$0.00
Active
$0.00
Active
$0.00
Active
so.oo
Closed
$0.00
Closed
so.oo
Active
1708 HAYS ELTON DR JEFFERSON C ITY $0.00
00 11 751 Pl 3-030 1 RESIDENTIAL 11 03070004035( SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF C losed
RALTPLBG 037324 205 E ATCHISON ST JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
13P-Penn it Lis ting (I 0/09/20 13 -9:221\M) P age I
AppNo Permit No Permit Class Tax Lot General Contractor Name Cost No Customer Name Permit Status
Permit :!l:J!e Lot No General Contractor Phone Lot Address Balance
0011754 P13-0302 RESIDENTIAL SAME AS APPLICANT 046418 MJS PLUMBING LLC Closed
RALTPLBG 011721 1333 GRANDVIEW DR Jefferson City MO $0.00
0011755 Pl3-0303 RESIDENTIAL 10010100030 13< SAME AS APPLICANT 046418 MJS PLUMBING LLC Closed
RALTPLBG 024484 16IO RIDGEWOOD DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011756 Pl3-0304 RESIDENTIAL 1002090003004< SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 007847 814 HARVEST DR Jefferson City MO $0.00
0011758 P13-0306 RESIDENTIAL 1002090003001 < SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 007826 362I W GORDON DR Jefferson City MO $0.00
0011759 Pl3-0307 RESIDENTIAL I 00 I 020003004< SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 025528 2612 SCHELLRIDGE RD JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011760 Pl3-0308 RESIDENTIAL 1 004200002005( SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 018820 4070 NEWCASTLE LN Jefferson City MO $0.00
0011762 BPB-0293 RESIDENTIAL 1001020003003( SAME AS OWNER 035784 Dallmeyer, Steve Active
RADDBLDG 025518 2615 SCHELLRIDGE RD JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011764 BP13-0295 RESIDENTIAL 1105160002002( SAME AS OWNER 036606 Barton-Beller, Karen Active
RADDBLDG 043959 303 BUCHANAN ST JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011766 BP13-0297 RESIDENTIAL 1006130003002( SAME AS OWNER 034536 Evers, Anthony Active
RADDBLDG 032019 1809 SUN VALLEY DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011768 P13-0309 RESIDENTIAL 1004200002006( SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 030546 2124 HASTINGS RD JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011769 P13-0310 RESIDENTIAL 110419000 I 00 I ( SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 042238 1323 ROSEVALLEY DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011770 BP13-0299 RESIDENTIAL II 04170001 003( SAME AS OWNER 036961 Brandhorst, Dennis Active
RADDBLDG 038662 214 CENTER ST JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011774 P13-0311 RESIDENTIAL SAME AS APPLICANT 023802 WILFRID BERNSKOETTER Closed
RALTPLBG 015067 514 E HIGH ST JEFFERSON CITY MO $0.00
0011775 Pl3-03 12 RESIDENTIAL 1109300001001 ( SAME AS APPLICANT 023802 WILFRID BERNSKOETTER Closed
RALTPLBG 046178 1911 GREEN MEADOW DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011776 Pl3-0313 RESIDENTIAL 1 00624000400 I ( SAME AS APPLICANT 023802 WILFRID BERNSKOETTER Closed
RALTPLBG 034180 2002 BROOKGREEN DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011777 P13-0314 RESIDENTIAL 11 03070004009( SAME AS APPLICANT 023798 DON BERNSKOETTER PLE Closed
RALTPLBG 036943 208 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011778 PI3-0315 RESIDENTIAL 11 05150003002( SAME AS APPLICANT 023798 DON BERNSKOETTER PLE Closed
RALTPLBG 043491 2314 STLOUIS RD JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
BP -Pennit Listing ( 10/09/2013 -9:22AM) Page2
AppNo Permit No Permit Class Tax Lot General Contractor Name Cust No Customer Name Permit Status
Permit :!lEe Lot No General Contractor Phone Lot Address Balance
0011779 P13-0316 RESIDENTIAL 0508340003003( SAME AS APPLICANT 023825 RAITHEL PLUMBING Closed
RALTPLBG 008730 3031 MERCEDES LN Jefferson City MO $0.00
0011782 Pl3-0319 RESIDENTIAL 1006140001 006( SAME AS APPLICANT 023825 RAITHEL PLUMBING Closed
RALTPLBG 032376 2110 STADIUM VIEW CT JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011783 Pl3-0320 RESIDENTIAL 110420000200 I( SAME AS APPLICANT 023825 RAITHEL PLUMBING Closed
RALTPLBG 043114 1308 ELMERINE AVE JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011784 Pl3-0321 RESIDENTIAL 100112000 I 004( SAME AS APPLICANT 023821 MIKE HOWELL & SON PLl Closed
RALTPLBG 052568 618 MICHIGAN ST X JEFFERSON CITY MO 65109 $0.00
0011785 Pl3-0322 RESIDENTIAL 050834000 I 006( SAME AS APPLICANT 023821 MIKE HOWELL & SON PLl Closed
RALTPLBG 020350 2701 SUE DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011786 Pl3-0323 RESIDENTIAL 1001120001003( SAME AS APPLICANT 023821 MIKE HOWELL & SON PLl Closed
RALTPLBG 026515 1211 ST MARYS BLVD JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011787 P13-0324 RESIDENTIAL 11 05220002007( SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 045404 2606 JENNIFER DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011794 Pl3-0326 RESIDENTIAL 1 006230003002< SAME AS APPLICANT 023833 GEORGE'S PLUMBING Closed
RALTPLBG 033488 2402 BLUEBIRD DR JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011806 Pl3-0328 RESIDENTIAL I 00420000200 I< SAME AS APPLICANT 023829 WENGER PLUMBING & AF Closed
RALTPLBG 008047 3936 LIVERPOOL DR Jefferson City MO $0.00
34 Records
BP -Permit Listing ( 10/09/2013 -9:22AM) Page3
Building Permits
Pennit Listing
User:
Printed:
First Sort:
Se cond Sort:
astratman
10/0 9/20 13-9:19AM
Pe m1it Class
(None)
App li cation No From :
Pem1it No From :
Gen C Last Name From:
Lot No From:
Ta x Lot From:
Lot Zip Code From:
C ust No From :
To:
To:
To: Application Date From:
To : Issu e Date From: 0910 1/2013
To: Compl etion Date From:
To: Expira ti on Date Fro m :
To : Pr int Date From:
To :
To: 0 9/30/20 13
To:
To:
To :
CITY OF }EFFERSON
JOHN G. CHRISTY MUNICIPAL BUILDING
320 E McCarty St
Jefferson City, MO 65101-3193
C ust Last Name From: To: Tmp CO Exp Date From: To :
Permit C lass:
Permit Type:
Permit S tatus:
AppNo
0011 352
0011 666
0011 680
0011 722
0011729
001 1737
0011767
0011796
NONRES ID ENTIAL
NRADDBLDG, NRALTBLDG, NRDEMBLDG, NRNEWBLDG
Ac ti ve, C losed
Permit No
BPI3-0288
BPI3-0306
BPI3-0282
BP I 3-0 280
BPI3-0285
BPI3-0290
BPI3-0298
BPI3-0303
Permit Class
Permit Type
Tax Lot
Lot No
General Contractor Name
General Contractor Phone
NONRESIDEN1 I 002040004000( SAME AS APPLICANT
NRNEWBLDG 029092
NONRESIDEN1 SAME AS APPLICANT
NRALTBLDG 016468
NONRESID EN1 05083 40004000< SAME AS OWNER
NRNEWBLDG 055759
NON RESIDEN1 1005160001001( SAMEASAPPLICANT
NRALTBLDG 03 0 807
NONRES fDEN1 I 007250002003< SAME AS OWNER
NRN EWBLDG 055945
NON RESIDEN1 SAME AS APPLICANT
NRALTBLDG 0181 38
NONRESIDEN1 I 00515000200 I ( SAME AS APPLICANT
NRALTBLDG 030749
NONRESIDEN1 I 00624000 I 002( SAME AS APPLICANT
NRALTBLDG 033986
BP-Permit Li sting (I 0/09/2013 -9:19AM)
C ust No Customer Name Permit Status
Lot Address Balance
048238 E.M. HARRI S C ONSTRUCT Act ive
34 15 N TEN M IL E DR J EFFERSON C ITY MO $0.00
04 844 1 BAILEY CONSTRUCTION l Act ive
3239 M ISS OURI BLVD JEFFERSON CITY M O $0.00
022639 M ISSOURI AMERICAN W I\ Act ive
29 0 ROCK HILL RD J EFFERSON C ITY so.oo
022875 NORTHWEST BU ILDE RS H Active
33 06 EMERALD LN STE FRONT J EFFERSON C IT Y so.oo
024072 C ITY OF JEFFERSON WAS1 Acti ve
2497 C HRI STY DR JEFF ERSON C ITY $0.00
0222 18 PRINGER CO. Act ive
705 MADISON ST J EFFERSON CITY MO $0.00
022879 ROLING RAY & SON CO. n Ac ti ve
1001 DIAMOND RDG ST E 11 00 JEFFERSON C ITY $0 .00
025569 L ES LIE PR O PERTIES L L C Ac ti ve
510 ELLIS BLVD STE F JEFFERSON CITY $0 .00
Page I
AppNo Permit No Permit Class Tax Lot General Contractoi'Name Cost No Customer Name Permit Status
Permit Type Lot No General Contractor Phone Lot Address Balance
0011798 BPIJ-0304 NONRESIDEN1 1104180004001( SAME AS OWNER 025569 LESLIE PROPERTIES L L C Active
NRALTBLDG 052152 917 LESLIE BLVD STE F JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011801 BP13-0307 NONRESIDEN1 1001120004002( SAME AS APPLICANT 048674 AT&T (NEW CINGULAR W Active
NRALTBLDG 027872 810 MYRTLE AVE JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011803 BPIJ-0309 NONRESIDEN1 100 Ill 0001 002( SAME AS APPLICANT 023962 NVL ELECTRIC Active
NRALTBLDG 025897 2111 MISSOURI BLVD STE F JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011804 BPIJ-0310 NONRESIDEN1 1001010004004( SAME AS OWNER 040357 BOOKER, DORMA LEE Active
NRALTBLDG 024997 410 HART ST JEFFERSON CITY $0.00
0011805 BPIJ-0311 NONRESIDEN1 SAME AS OWNER 040555 Aero Industrial Enterprises Active
NRALTBLDG 055414 219 MADISON ST JEFFERSON CITY MO 65101-$0.00
13 Records
BP-Permit Listing (10/09/2013-9:19AM) Page2
Violation Report
September, 20 13
Establishment Address C ity Last lns [!ection C ritical Non-Critical
EL JIMADOR MEXICAN RESTAURANT 1408 M ISSOURI BLVD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/13120 13 0 0
EL JIMADOR MEXICAN RESTAURANT 5 12 ELLIS BLVD JEFFERSON CITY 9125120 13 0 2
ELJLMADOR 2930 EDGEWOOD DRIVE JEFFERSON CITY 912012013 0 I
M l TOLTECA MEXICAN RESTAURANT 1850-F ROUTE C JEF FERSON CITY 912512013 0 3
ABUNDANT RAW LIFE 1810 SCARBOROUGH DRI VE JEFFERSON CITY 912112013 0 0
ALEXANDROS RESTAURANT & TG'S LOUNGE 2125 M ISSOURJ BLVD JEFFERSON CITY 912512013 0 2
AMERJCAN LEGION POST 5 1423 TANNER BRI DGE RD JEFFE RSON C ITY 912112013 0 0
B.K. BAKERY, LLC 901 MISSOURI BOULEVARD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/3/2013 0 6
BASKJN ROBBINS 1922-A MISSOURI BLVD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/4/2013 0 3
BRAZITO LIONS BALL PROGRAM 2913 SUNNY BROOK JEFFERSON CITY 9/13/2013 0 0
BREAK TIME 627 CLARK AVE JEFFE R SON C ITY 9/11/2013 0 5
CAP ITAL REG ION MEDICAL CENTER 1126 MADISON ST JEFFE R SON C ITY 9/17/2013 0 2
CAPTAJN D'S SEAFOOD 2 11 8 M ISSOURI. BLVD JEFFE RSON C ITY 9/3012013 0
CHI NA WOK 520-L ELLIS BOULEVARD JEFFERSON CITY 9112/2 013 0 4
CHLPOTLE M EXICAN GRJLL 1400 MISSOURI BOULEVARD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/912013 0 0
CLARKE SENJOR CENTER 1310 LINDEN DR JEFFERSON C ITY 9/4/2013 0 1
CREATIVE KIDZ ACADEMY 2003 SOUTHRIDGE DRIVE JEFFERS ON CITY 9/1112013 0 0
EAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1229 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY 912412013 0 0
FOUNTAIN OF LIFE 95 GRANT ST. JEFFERSON C ITY 9ni20I3 0 0
HIBACHI GRJLL & SUPREME BUFFET 730 WEST STADIUM BOULEVARD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/2612013 2 2
JAMIE'S PRIVATE CLUB 900 WEST MCCARTY STREET JEFFE RSON CITY 9/12/2013 3
JEFFERSON CITY FIREF IGHTERS LOCAL 671 1305 MOREAU DRIVE JEFFERSON CITY 9/1912013 0 0
JEFFERSON C ITY HIGH SCHOOL 609 UNION ST JEFFERSON C ITY 9/19/20 13 0 0
KELLI 'S DAY CARE 20480 STATE RD A HARTSBURG 9/15/2013 0 0
KElTLE CORN K INGS 264 S. SUMMIT DRIVE HOLTS SUMMIT 9113/2013 0 0
LARRY BONDURANT CANCER BENEFIT 825 SOUTHWEST BOULEY AJ{O JEFFERSON C ITY 9/141201 3 0 0
MARJNE CORPS LEAGUE 4925 BUS 50 WE ST JEFFERSON C ITY 9/1412013 0 0
MCDONALDS 1918 JEFFERSON ST JEFFERSON C ITY 912412013 0 4
MCDONALD'S 1425 M ISSOURI BLVD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/3120 13 0 4
MOREAU HEIGHTS EL EMENTARY SCHOOL 1410 HOUGH PARK JEFFERSON CITY 9125/2013 0 0
MORTIMER KEGLEY'S 11 5 E HIG H ST JEFFERSON C ITY 9/3012013 2 5
PAPA MURPHY'S 1803 MISSOURI BLVD-SUITE F JEFFERSON CITY 9/9/20 13 0 1
PRISON BREWS 305 ASH STREET JEFFERSON CITY 9/25120 13 0 0
SEN IOR CENTER AT THE MALL 3600 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE JEFFERSON CITY 9/16120 13 0 0
SHEP'S SOUTHSIDE 11 2 EAST DUNKLIN STREET JEFFERSON CITY 9116/20 13 0 1
SMALL FRY PRESCHOOL 16 14 SOUTHWEST BLVD JEFFERSON C ITY 9/20/2013 0 0
SOUTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 707 LINDEN JEFF ERSON C ITY 9/912013 0 0
SOUTHWEST ELEM ENTARY SCHOOL 812 STMARY 'S BLVD JEFFERSON CITY 9/23/2013 0
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL 2303 W MALN ST JEFFERSON CITY 9/16/2013 0
ST PETERS SCHOOL 3 14 E HIGH ST JEFFERSON CITY 9/17/2013 0 0
SUBWAY 3600 COUNTRY CLUB DR JEFFERSON CITY 9/412013 0 3
SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOP 1922-B M I SSOURJ BLVD JEFFERSON CITY 911812 013 0 l
THOMAS JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL 1201 FAIRGROUNDS R.D JEFFERSON CITY 9126/2013 0 0
THORPE GORDON ELEMENTARY II 0 I JACKSON ST JEFFERSON CITY 9/1912013 0 0
TRJNITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL 803 SWLFJ"S HWY JEFFERSON CITY 9/912013 0
VEIT'S PUB AND GRI LL 23 14 LORENZO GREEN DRJVE JEFFERSON C ITY 9118120 13 0 I
W AL-MART BAKERY 40 1 SUPE RCENTER DRIVE JEFFERSON CITY 9124120 13 0 0
WAL-MART DELl 40 1 SUPE RCENTER DRIVE JEFFERSON CITY 9/25120 13 0
WAL-MARTGROCERY /DAIRY 40 1 SUPERCENTER DRJVE JEFFERSON CITY 9123/2013 0
WAL-MART MEAT/SEAFOOD 401 SUPERCENTER DRJVE JEFFERSON CITY 9123/2013 0 I
WAL-MART PRODUCE 401 SUPERCENTER DRJVE JEF FERS ON CITY 9/23/2 013 0 0
ZESTO DRJVE-INN 50 I BROADWAY STREET JEFFERSON CITY 9/23/2013 0 5
Grand Total: 5 66
Inspection Report September 2013
Establishment Type
Establishment Catagorv Routine Re-Inspections Field Visit Other
Food_ Service
Restaurant 15 12 0 3
Caterer 0 0 0 0
School 9 0 0 0
Institution 1 0 0 1
Temporary Food Stand 8 0 0 0
Tavern 1 0 0 0
Senior Citizen 2 0 0 0
USDA Summer Feeding 0 0 0 0
Frozen Desert Estab. 1 0 0 0
Camps 0 0 0 0
Day Care 2 0 0 6
Frozen Dessert Estab. 0 0 0 0
39 12 0 10
Retaii_Food
Bakery -Retail 1 0 0 0
Bakery -Wholesale 0 0 0 0
Convenience Store 1 0 0 0
Meat Cutting 0 0 0 0
Frozen Dessert Est 0 0 0 0
Grocery Store 5 0 0 1
Catering 0 0 0 0
Manufactures 0 0 0 0
Distributors 0 0 0 0
Warehouses 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 1
Grand Total: 46 12 0 11