HomeMy Public PortalAbout19791203 Regular Council Meeting, December 3, 1979,
Mayor Pro tem Rftckers presided.
Trayer was offered by Rev. Armin Klemme , Central United Church of
lChrist.
J
1 present : Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon, Hequembourg,
! Kliegel, Prenger, Robinson and Whitecotton.
i'Councilmen absent : None.
---------------------------
'IThe following bids were received for 33 Guard Rail Beams and 12 Endij
I! Sections, for use of the Public Works Department :
33 Guard Rail Beams 12 End Sections
Openingi�U.S. Steel Supply $46. 20 - 1, 524. 60 16. 25 - 195. 00
of Bidsi,DeLong' s, Inc. 50. 26 - 1 , 658. 58 13. 75 - 165. 001,
� Tamco Supply Co. 58. 87 - 1,942. 17.90 - 214. 80 ,lj
is f
•! Councilman Borgmeyer moved that we accept that lowest bid - that of
';U.S . Steel Supply, St. Louis, Missouri . Motion seconded by
;;Councilman Crader and passed.
---------------------
i�The following bids were received for Hydraulic hoist and controls toti
!!be installed on 1979 Ford truck, for use of the Public Works
Opening i''Department :
of Bids
, Parkhurst Mfg. Co. , $1, 075. 82
"Knapheide Truck Equipment Co. 1, 298. 00
,!The bids were turned over to Mike Bates for consideration , to report
;;back later in the meeting.
:; Later Mr. Bates reported they recommended the acceptance of the bid :;
` from Parkhurst Manufacturing Company of Sedalia, Missouri , the
lowest bid. Councilman Whitecotton moved that ouch bid be accepto(11�1
Motion seconded by Councilman Robinson and passod.
----------------------
I; The following bids were received for Survoying E,quipmont for %ISO of
the Public Works Department :
Brunson Int4trumont Company $ 9, 801 . 80
Opening
Service Blue Print Company 10,626. 00
of Bids Seiler Instrument & Mfg. Co. 10, 773. 22
William Powers 10, 658. 59 Alternato
The bids were turned over to Mika Batos for consideration , to roporq;i
l' back later in the meeting,
i! Later Mr. Bates reported they recorrviiended the acceptance of the bid !
from Brunson Instrument Company of Kansas City, Missouri , the
d
; lowest bid. Councilman Robinson moved that such bid be accepted.
! Motion seconded by Councilman-Whitecotton and carried.
ii ------- ---------
IThe following bid was received for Gasoline and Diesel Fuel , for it
Opening Ituse of Public Works Department :
of Bids Loethen Oil Company - Regular 80. 0 Diesel No. I - 83. 5
Non-Lead 84. 0 No. 2 - 79. 5
ji
All prices exclude taxes.
! Councilman Whitecotton moved we accept the bid. Motion seconded byl
iCouncilman Borgmeyer and-passed.
---------------
! The following bids were received for an Akron brass 3 inlet
11multiversal monitor:
Hutchinson-Witherup $1 ,400. 00 -160.00
Fire & Safety Equipment
Opening Emergency Vehicle Services 1, 493. 00 +194.00
of Bids Sneads Safety Sales
Akron 1, 566. 79 1, 369.49
Elkhart 1,429. 30 1 ,293.61
2 1.8
r_�w_.,.._._.. .....___. ....._.. _ . . _I3eI;u,lar.,Council Meeting, December. 3, 1979.,
..+..�.:.......... ............ ... H.. ,...:. ,. ...v a ,.......•t•+.
iThce .following bids were received for 6 Scott: presurs-pak lla;
(; Hutchison-Witherup Fire $4 , 725. 00
�{ & Safety Equipment , Inc. 4,278. 00 - Alternate :opening
j Emergency Vehicle Services 5, 040. 00 'of bids.
a: Sneads Safety Sales 41430. 40
The bids were turned over to the Fire Chief for consideration , to
report back later in the meeting.
Later Chief Rennick reported he recommended the acceptance of the
'bid of Hutchinson--Witherup for $1 ,400. 00; and the bid of Snead' s
Safety Sales for $4 ,430. 40. Councilman Robinson moved that such
(bids be accepted. Motion seconded by Councilman Whitecotton and
(passed.
;i _-------------------------
jThe following Consent Agenda was presented;
Approval of the Minutes of the meeting of November 19th.
! Resignation of Robert McPherson , Engineering Department . ' Consent
?� Resignation of Jack Vanderpool, Transit Department . Agenda
Resignation of Keith Welch , Street Department.
! Employment of Kenneth Martin , 'Transit Department .
i± Employment of Wm. Vaught , part-time, Transit Department .
!The following Minutes of the Memorial Airport Commission were I'
4received:
O'The meeting of the Jefferson City Airport Commission was called to
il
,order by Chairman John B. Randolph at 12 : 37 p.m. Commission membersti
}present were Messrs. Munzell. , Burrus, Bryan , Miller and Mrs. Karen
,Garner. Others present were Roger Dick, News Tribune; Kevin Kelly,
IEKWOS : Mr. Bill Ward, I:rle A. Taylor and Linda Little.
ii
'{Mrs;. Karen Garner was introduced to Commi.s"lon Members au the new
y{appointoo, Mrs. Garner was appointed by the Mayor at tile. City
`Council Meetittf; hold oil November 1.9 , 1979.
jho motion to approve tho nllnutes of the pro0oun Comrnitiglon
mooting wnu mudv by Dr. Mil..lor; seconded by Mr. lltinzull and
unanlmoufll.y earriod.
{EDIficucit-aoll wt -1 l oAd epee tileu t,uw syeatem cat' purchasing. Mr. Randolph
i:tiai.d until we rucolvee rrcnv direction.- e:)n propari.ng our birdrot , wce
'.will. corttinuo afi we havo boon doing. Mr. Taylor told thee moinborti we
�iiiow will rill out it purellittjo roquisition to be approved by the
.purchasing uE;eent--who will. write, the purchase order, There bei.nt, no Convent
que8tionti oil tike fitiacicial. report Dr. Miller made the motion to Agenda
approve the financial statement for November. Mr. Burruss made 'the
,,second and the motion carried.
1Mr. Taylor told tile Colrmission we had received the finished Master
Flan on Thursday (each member has it copy) and ha and Mr. landolph
took the FAA their copies ore (Friday of last weak. Mr. Taylor Is
explained the Master Plan contained every thing we would hope to �{
accomplish for airport development during the next twenty years,
stating if it isn ' t in the Master Plan we cannot receive Federal it
Funding. Ei
Under the contract with Mr. Verslues, he was to furnish us with ten
copies the FAA with two. In order to have the printing done Mr.
Verslues had to get 30 copies--they cost $35.00 each. Mr. Taylor
and Mr. Randolph told the Commission they would like approval to
1buy some of the remaining copies as we need to furnish copies to 1!
(the following: State Library, City Library, Mayor, City Clerk, j,
iMissouri Department of Aviation and we need to have 5 or 6 on hand
(for Airline Work. The Master Plan cost $33, 000 with our share
being $3,300. After much discussion the motion was made by Dr. i!
Miller and seconded by Mr. Burruss that Mr. Taylor negotiate with
jjlMr. Verslues to buy the remaining copies of the Master Plan at a
I1cost not to exceed $350. 00. The motion carried.
� Mr. Taylor reported on the trip to Kansas City. He said they went
to deliver the FAA copies of the Master Plan (we were told the ;!
!Master Plan was approved; however, we have to furnish some more
( drawings from Mr. Verslues. This would break loose around $100,000.1;
Mr. Baker carne here after serving as the Assistant Director at F.
►Worth, Texas. We met with Mr. Baker for an hour and a half during
whichtime we had considerable discussion on having the FAA take !r
��over the Control Tower and the VASI . We have one set of VASI ' s '
9 9
Council Meet
land the FAA has one set. We would litre to turn rn ou r s over t o them as`
9M 1!they send a mail down to service their' s and it would be nice if they
could maintain both sets. The original cost to us was $750. 00 on a
,1$7, 500. 00 lighting project. We would save more than the original
Post to us maintenance wise.
;Mr. Taylor told the Commission that Mr. Randolph had gone into a lotl
E,agreed f detail concerning the FAA taking over our Control Tower and we inl�
urn received alot of nols. Mr. Randolph said, "Mr. Baker finally 'I
to send one of his men down to study tile situation. This is
1.1a little progress. " We were also told we are in line for our runway
',6xtention but the appropriations bill hasn ' t been passed as yet .
;After the meeting with Mr. Baker, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Randolph went
!to the Civil Aeronautics Board and met with their new Director,
Consenti'Mr. Dean Sparkman. Mr. Sparkman was formerly with an airline in
Agenda 'Montana and has only been with the CAB for approximately five weeks.
,
'We were interested in discussing the Essential Air Service. What
:Jefferson City Memorial Airport received from the briefs was nothing.;
:'Under the present program as a hyphenated point with Columbia we
will not receive any subsidy. We discussed the Air Service and
he suggested if we didn' t like the results we could go back and file'i
.a case. (A copy of the study JCMA had done by Diemler and Diekemper:1
II Was given to Mrs . Garner. )
Airport 'The roofing of the terminal is completed and we are waiting for a
;food ood rain to see if It will pass inspection. We have several
Minutes troblems which occurred during the time the old roof was leaking.
he wall and ceiling in Trans-Mo Airlines office is in bad shape
'but will need to dry out before we can repair it ; the ceiling in
'Tremain ' s must be repaired, also a portion of the front walk cover
land the tile wall outside. We are starting the inside areas with
our own people.
1A brief discussion was held on the purchase of a truck and equip-
Pent burn. As it is already budgeted we only need it motion to
!,write the specifications to obtain bids. It was decided to trot bids'i
i I i!
;'on 1979 its well as 1980 models for a. 3/4 or I ton four-wheel drive
!'!pickup Including a blado on the front for snow removill around the
01torminal and parking lot. The equipment bur ( formerly rof erred to
i'as it pole, barn) Is to be used to house tho equipment . Mr. Bryan
;told the Cotni)iisslon he and Mr. Bates had discussed the trucit it few
,days ago and thought perhaps we would be I)ottor of with a 2J ton 11
:'truck rather than the pickup its tho larger truck could be
utiliz I t(�
1,removo snow from the runways. After further discussion it wits
;;decided this would be something to conaidor tinder next years budget
but for this year we need tile all purpose vehicle to replace the
lijoep which we use and need to got around in all kinds of situation ,
4. e. flooding and snow. Dr. Miller made; the motion for Mr. Taylor
!;to draw up the specifications oil the truck and equipment barn and
!submit them for bids. The motion was seconded by Mr. Munzell and
:;carried unanimously.
Consent l e next item was the closing of the Control Tower on Christmas and i
Agenda ' ew Year Days. Mr. Randolph explained it has been the policy of thell
i`Commission to vote to close the tower on these two days as they are I
1the only holidays the Tower Controllers receive. lie stated we have jf
Ian agreement with the FAA to close and a NOTAM is published by
Ian
Flight Station. Dr. Miller made the motion to authorize th
!!closing of the Tower on Christmas and New Year days. Mr. Burruss
I'made the second and the motion carried.
:!Mr. Taylor explained to the Commission that the proposal with Diemle
hand Diekemper had covered three phases: 1) The Air Service
!Requirement Study; 2) Carrier Meetings: This would consist of jl
ppreparing for and conducting meetings with the present carrier and
,potential new carriers to discuss the results of the Air Ser vice
!Requirements Study and to encourage service improvements; 3) Civili�
Board Action Program: This consists of meeting with th ICAB to gain their assistance in obtaining the air service we have
d to be essential for Jefferson City.
•)The second phase of the proposal is what we need to undertake now
land Mr. Taylor explained that he and Mr. Randolph feel they can do
!this task themselves; noting that Mr. Taylor has already been to
!see two carriers and has three more in Illinois to see. At present
'time we are having discussions with three carriers Skyways, Royal
Air and Utility Air. We have made several inquiries on financial
Regular Council Meeting , December 3, 1979.
;stability find some, have good financial bacic,i.ng. Skyways war3
!I recently sold to Atlantic Richf-toJd(Unlon Petra Chem) who now oiler -
jlate Rio Airline in Texas. It is our understanding they purchased
Skyways as they have a 121 Certificate. Mr. Taylor said we are
;working on this phase and in our opinion we feel we can save Consent
`$10, 000. 00 for this service. Agenda
?The third phase with the Civil Aeronautics Board will cost $1 ,200. 00
(end it is our opinion that when the time comes we should go with
„Diemler and Diekemper for this phase. Dr. Miller stated phase two iz
',,might be too much to ask of Mr. Taylor and Mr. Randolph considering :
{,the administrative work, travel and paper work involved and looking .
,:toward Spring and the physical improvements to to be undertaken
Nr. Randolph said they can accomplish this task as they have their
jpersonal contacts. The Commission agreed they should continue.
iMr. Taylor presented the report on the AOCI Conference (see attached)
Wand asked Mr. Munzell to make any comments he might wish to add.
i;Mr. Munzell told the Commission he had met people from all over the
'world including people with the FAA, CAB and the Airline Industry.
1,:IIe stated they are all after the same thinlrs we are seeking, however
solne c3i' them are talking millions and millions of dollars and we
;are talking; some few cents i.n comparision . Mr. Munzell said they
Mall grin and say Yes , we are with you. Mr. Munzell said he' s not Airport
sure but sometime in the future we will see the major airlines
i� Commission
! owning and .feeding airports like ours. One airline representative Minutes
told him they will have to take a deep interest in seeing; that
smaller airports receive some type of service. Mr. Munzell said
i�those meetings fire important and regardless of what some people
+feel and say it is very important for us to continue to attend--if
.we don't they (FAA and CAB) will. tell us we are not interested when
yjwe seek their help. On it lighter note Mr. Munzell added that he
wanted to inform the Commission that E rle had tried to keep his
fexpenses dawn by eating; at Woolworths.
r; Mr. Taylor told the Commission they had eaten dinner in the motel
?;the evening, of their arrival and tried their breakfast the next
1�morning, however, it ro l 1. , ;juice and coffee tol.rtled $7. 50 so lie
lbogrttn lits f:earch for it cheaper place and discovered Woolworths a
'jcouplo of blocks from thc� motel where they ate brealtfast and
I;fiomot.i.tllos lunch fcrr tbo rernsiinder of thol.r stay.
;IMr. Randolph Mr. Mintzer+ l it vote of thst►ikt-t for having;
iatt;ended Cho Conferene(: at his own oxj)ense. Consent
"The next Item was Clio I)c.c c.rrtbc t• c�,'rrrnsnJ.S.;.gcrn ►nrr.tin ; Mr. Randolph
Agenda
f I.
explained that cWrary yi'n►• the Commistsion had passed a resolution
,not to meet in December expia.ln iiigr it' sui emergency arose they could
!call a meeting;. Dr. Miller made the motion not to hold a
!Commission meeting; in December; soconded by Mr. Burruss and carried..,
'Mr. Ranoldph thanked Mrs. Garner and welcomed her as a new member of"
the Airport Commission .
�fThere being no further business the meeting; was adjourned at
1 :22 p.m.
Respectfully submited
t`
Ii /s/Erie Taylor, Secretary"
i
The following Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission were
Ereceived:
The Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission met at 7 : 30 p.m.,�!
on November 20, 1979, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall withii
the following members present : Chairman P. Pierre Dominique,
presiding; Members Mike Bates, Vince Borgmeyer, Charles Dudenhoeff- 1,
I� er, Jr. , Charles Jackson, Seth Evans, Norwin Houser, Obie Munzell ;Consent
and Margaret Noblin . Members absent were: Dick Caplinger and TripAgenda
;England. Others present were Thomas H. Benton, Director of Planning
Land D. R. Preston, City Planner.
IThe Minutes of the October 18, 1979, Commission meeting were
+ approved as submitted on a motion by Mr. Dudenhoeffer with a secondj'
1by Mr. Evans.
(The following items of business were transacted: j
111. The first item of business was the request from Central Mo. {
��Professional Services , Inc. , for the approval of the final plat of
IiSection 3 of Leanda Subdivision. The owners of this subdivision are!!
a
II
Regular Council Meetin&,__Leqpm r 3 7
R. Lee Stafford and Wanda L. Stafford. Mr. Canoe Cardwell with
Central Missouri Professional Services was present to answer
it
;;questions. Mr. Borgmeyer asked if the plat conformed to all City
!'requirements. Mr. Benton replied in the affirmative. Mr. Borgmeyer!
;moved the plat be approved with a second by Mr. Evans. The motion
lireceived unanimous approval.
112. The next item on the agenda was a request from Central Mo.
,!Professional Services, Inc. , for the approval of the preliminary
plat of Jordan Towne Subdivision, Mr. Jack Jordan owner. Mr. Cance
;;Cardwell made the presentation and answered questions. The staff
Consentlireport on this subdivision specified a number of plat changes which
Agenda ;,;needed to be made. Mr. Cardwell stated those changes were acceptabl4
,"to the owner and the engineering firm was in the process of revising
:;the plat. Following further discussion and examination of the plat,
,Mr. Evans moved that the preliminary plat be approved subject to
:,the conditions contained in the staff report . After a second by It
:'Mr. Noblin, the motion received unanimous approval.
::,13. The third item of business was the request from Ronald J.
;;Prenger, that ti f land
Prenger, attorney for Mr. Al Horner, to rezone ta portion oI I
;'lying within the City limits adjacent to and west of Rainbow Drive
viand north of Highway 50 West. The request is to rezone this pro-
,I!perty from RS-1 (single family) to C-4 (planned commercial) . At
!!their October 18, 1979, meeting the Commission recommended that this'
,.request be denied. The City Council referred this matter back to
!1
,ithe Commission for reconsideration.
Planning ;iMr. Houser stated this request was given careful consideration at
-:the previous meeting and that he felt the reconsideration should be
& Zoning
Commission imited to evidence not known by the proponents at the October 18
,me . lie felt a bad precedent would be established if the
Minutes • oting
.Commission reversed its prior decision unless this reversal was
:based on now and convincing evidence. Chairman Dominique pointed ;I
out the rezoning request was before the Commission for reconsidera-
:!:tion and this did not mean the Commission had to change its mind.
,�Mr. Borgmeyer stated het roquosted the matter be referred back to
lithe ConutiInsion. As the Council hate the, authority to overrule the
{'Comtriisoton , Mr. BorjMeyor felt the, Commission should be given an
:Opportunity for rocont.►ideration botoro the Council. acted.
!The "tatutl of, the Highway Dopttrtmont. lt4 condemnation for U.S . 50
right-of-way through tho Horner property was discussed. Mr. Prenger;
,stated that land fiwiiodiatoly t.►outh of' the tract for which rezoning
Consent !:,in roqtioE;tod, wan condomnod for highway right-of-way on November 19 ,jl
Agonda1979. Ito further 6tatod that Commit*0oner' 8 have not boon appointo
.;that tho Ilighway Department has agreed to provide access as
l,'originally proposed, and that in the eyes of the Highway Department 1
;!the remaining property in commercial property which has benefited i
;from the re-location of the highway.
,,Mr. Prenger said the minimal lot depth and the presence of the Ij
169KV power line made the tract unsuitable for rosidential develop-
ent. Ile pointed out that the C-4 zoning would give the City
substantial control over the proposed office use. ' Mr. Prenger was
then given an opportunity to respond to the staff report . lie named
texisting commercial establishments along U. S. 50 both inside and
outside of the City and stated the precedent for commercial use
lalong the highway had been established. Mr. Prenger questioned
'11whether or not the Comprehensive Plan Supplement extended outside of
!the corporate limits to the Apache Flats area. Mr. Prenger was
iinformed that the Plan did extend outside of the City and the Plan
suggested future land uses both inside and outside of the City.
Mr. Prenger stated the Commission should look at the Plan as
suggested uses, make adjustments to it for development , and the
highest and best use for the property being considered is commerciall,
,use. Mr. Horner was given an opportunity to be heard and stated he
'!had nothing to add to Mr. Prenger' s presentation. No one appeared
ilin opposition to the request.
,Mr. Jackson concurred with the earlier comments of Mr. Houser. He
I felt the Comprehensive Plan was prepared at public expense as a
j'guide to give the Commission a basis upon which it can make its
"decisions. He recommended the request be sent back to the Council
I
las previously submitted.
Regular Council Meeting, December
!Following a discu I ssion 1,of spot zo I ning and whether or not 'a Preo6d6nV*
the ould be established, Mr. Fvans moved that the request be denied. :1
second to this motion ,,Iras made by Mr. Jackson . The motion was
1massed and the request denied by the following vote:
Members voting aye: Noblin , Evans , Bates, Munzell ,
Jackson and Houser '!, Consent
ii
:
Members voting nay : Dudenhoeffer and Borgmeyer Agenda
Under the heading of other business, Mr. Preston distributed
excerpts from a report prepared by the U.S . Department of Justice on.�
zoning. Mrs. Noblin urged the Commission members to write in
support of Federal House Bill #4788 and Senate Bill #703, which
contain funding for the Wears Creek project . Mrs. Noblin expressed
her concerns for better planning coordination efforts. Mr. Benton
linformed those present the Planning Advisory Committee , Mr. Jackson
;Chairman, was investigating coordination needs. Mr. Jackson invited
iMrs. Noblin to submit her thoughts and concerns to him. it
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
fl
i i
lRespectfully submitted ,
I/s/Charless Jackson , Secretary"
Councilman Whitecotton moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Motioal.
seconded by Councilman Hequembourg and passed.
See Page 224.
-------------------------
--------- ------------
The request of Beulah Lutz, Willitun Jordan , Marie Parris , Arthur Planning
Jablonsky and Darrell fio].Jins , for rezoning of land at 600-602-604-- and Zoning
606-608 Ellis Boulevard and 1922 Tanner Bridge Road, from RS-2 to Commission
C-1. was referred to the 1)lanninfl, and Zoning Commission. The
request was accompanied by chock In the amount of $50. 00.
Planning
The request of Orlando En_,r
el )recht and Mrs. Dorothy Kemper, for and Zoning
rezoning of land on East, McCarty Street, from RS-2 to C,2 , was Commission
referred to the PlanninIr rind Zojifnr Coininlsqlon . The request: was
iaccompan lod by vh(�cic 111 t'llo 11111ount of $50. 00.
Bill No. 92 , introduced~by Councilman Brant , on C-[ t I cad :
"An Ordinanco of' 010 City ()I, Jo(,1,e1,!-;()n , Mhssourl , o'sLabl ,M18.9 i s)1111 J)"
Primary and Gonoral E'lovc](nit; In the City or Je1'4'01*!30n , ouri ,
' Dill 92.
for 1980. 11 Election
Mead first and t-,econd time by t.11,1e and ordered distt•ibutod Dates
'to 1110 fill)0 1,14 of the council .
---------------------._-----
Bill No. 93, introduced by Councilmen Rac.kers, Crader and Kliegel , : Bill 93
entitled: 11
i City
"An Ordinance creating the office of City Administrator, appointment;!i Administrator
tenuro, qualifications for offico, bond, compensation , removal. from
office, duties , powers , interference by members of the City Council ,!!
repeal of conflicting ordinances, and effective data. "
Read first and second time by title and ordered distributed to
members of the Council.
Bill No. 94, introdiiE5a-Ey-C6iiEEITffiFtfi-Ciaa6rT-entitled:
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , accepting and
approving the plat of Leanda Addition , Section Three, a sub-divisioj�
of the City of Jefferson , Missouri, as herein described. " IlBill 95
1.
Read first and second time by title and on request of Councilman Accepting
It
Crader the rules were suspended and the Bill was read the third IlLeanda
,time by title and placed on final passage and was passed by the '! Subdivision
following vote as Ordinance No. 9353 :
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon,
Hequembourg , Kliegel , Prenger, Robinson
and Whitecotton. ii
Councilmen voting Nay : None.
Councilmen absent : None.
-------------------------------- it
ii
it
Regular Council Meeting, December 3, 1979.
�JBill No. 88, introduced by Councilman YRaekers,�+.entitled: .......~� -,_�.w .
,1
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , amending the Code
':!of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by repealing Section 22-13 relating (
,to form of licenses and applications for business, and enacting a
8111 88 !;new Section 22-13 relating to the same subject, in lieu thereof. "
BusinessjBill No. 88 was read the third time by title and placed on final
Licensesi�passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9354 : :`
itouncilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon, Iy
Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger, Robinson
!! and Whitecotton.
!;Councilmen voting Nay: None.
jCouncilmen absent : None. ----- �I
Ij ------------------
1;Bill No. 89, introduced by Councilman Brant, entitled:
="An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending the Code
`iof the City of Jefferson, 1978, by repealing Ordinance No. 8227, an
Bill 89 111all other ordinances in conflict herewith, and enacting an ordinance
Lagers ';providing benefits for the employees of the City, except firemen ,
System ilunder the Missouri. Local Government Employees Retirement System, ;;
,authorizing deductions from employees ' wages, and authorizing pay- j
ment of employer contributions. " t
�IBill No. 89 was read the third time by title and placed on final
11passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9355:
('Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
!` Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger, Robinson and Whitecotton ;
4Councilmen voting Nay: None.
ilCouncilmen absent . None
----------------
j}Dill No. 90, introduced by Councilman Brant, entitled: jl
i"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , setting forth the
;provisions relating to conduct , safety, vacation leave , sick leave, '
,emergency leave , holiday leave, accumulated leave, and retirement o�l
all city employees, and further providing for record keeping, and
�tho adoption of rulo.9 and rogulationr3 by Department Heads, and A
repealing Ordinance No. 8914 and any othr.r ordinances or parts--I of
!�cardinancoo to conflict. herewith. "
�Councilman Brant; proi_�jvntod an amendment which should be includod in
Dill 90 thcs Bill and which h wigs orronoousl y loft t out. The Ainondinont is i
Personnel ;'Sub-suction (cs) of Sect-ion , and readn as follows :
Coda '
"( c) Any City Employeo who, in the courHo of hiH cmtploy-
mont , 1H roqulred to operato city vohiclos and/or equipmont ,
whoso drivor ' s:c llcont,e is suspended or revoked by the Missouri s
I Director of Rovenue, may be automatically torminatod from
�! employment by the City. " �{
r
(!`Councilman 1:3ritnt moved thin such Amendment be accepted. Motion !j
!eoconded by Councilman 1equembourg and passed.
Iill No. 90, as amended, was then read the third time by title and
I laced on final passage, and was passed by the following vote as
I rdinance No. 9356:
+Councilmen voting Aye: Brant , Crader, Gordon , Hequembourg , Kliegel,
C! Prenger, Robinson and Whitecotton.
ouncilmen voting Nay : Borgmeyer.
Councilmen absent : None. _
��ill No. 91, introduced-by-Councilman Brant , entitled:
Bill 91 !"An Ordinance of the City of Jeffeson, Missouri, fixing the salaries-,
Salary land expense accounts of City elective and appointive officials and ;+
Ordinance Cmployees , and repealing Ordinance 9193 of the City of Jefferson, i
l herewith
.1
all other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewit '
11
,pill No.No. 91 was read the third time by title and placed on final it
passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9357: ii
;;Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon, �!
Hequembourg, Kliegel , Prenger, Robinson
and Whitecotton. (
(Councilmen voting Nay: None.
iCouncilmen absent : None.
I
_qg.pJAr.Spincil Meet 1979.
Councilman Cxader referred to Bill No. 86, the Animal Control I! Bill 86
Ordinance, which is now on the Informal Calendar, and advised that all
meeting will be held this month to further discuss the matter. i, Animal
1! Control
-----------------------------
Councilman Whitecotton recalled Bill 87, the Litter Ordinance, from !� Bill 87
the Informal Calendar and requested it be given no further consider- Litter
ation. He was asking that the Bill be withdrawn. i' Ordinance
------------------------------ il
Director of Public Works, Mike Bates, reported that he had met withli
property owners of Southwest Boulevard, close to Thompson Street ,
and they were generally receptive to our tentative plans. The
response has been positive up to this time. We have also met with
the Utilities and they are informed of our schedule and have
lindicated there is no problem there.
Mr. Bates also reported about the Sunset Lake Road - he stated therl,
had been numerous requests about the Road. The owner had been
notified that the Road should be back in shape before winter
weather, but Mr. Bates had asked the Street Commissioner to give
consideration to the alternate route in the event this road was not
repaired.
li
Meeting adjourned to go into-Executive-Session. iAdJournment
----------------------
ii
After the Consent Agenda had been approved, which included Minutes
of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Councilman Hequembourg state
he felt there had been quite a bit of discussion in the media, etc. ,
about our rezoning request. lie felt that some of the discussion ,
and many of the comments, were made because he was a member of the
City Council , not on the merits or non-merits of the issue before
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Thia Is the second time the matter was before, the Planning and
Zoning Commission - ho did not thinit they even considered the inCritSI,
or non-merits - they thought this group was trying, to force some-
thing upon them, they took it as all affront to the Planning and
Zoning Conunission. The State Statutos stato that the City Council
makes the final determination on planning and zoning requests
that is why we have public livarings, and that is why there are
provisions to override the Planning and Zoning docJtilon.
ocauso he is a Member of the City Council , and because he believes
very strongly in the City, lie wanted his office to be within the
lCity Limits. There are seven acrof-; of property there, five and
one-half acres are located outside the City Limits - lie could have
built the facility across the City Limits Line.
Regarding the statement the Mayor made that lie would veto any Kill
that would override a decision of that body, the Council has sent
any changes back to the Commission in the past , had made many
changes. It takes the same number of votes to override the Planningi
and Zoning Commission decision as it does to override the Mayor' s
veto.
Pasically, it is the Council ' s decision to make those final judg-
ments and he felt that because of his position on the Council that
was made a big issue when it should not have been.
---------------------------